Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934
Filed by
the Registrant x
Filed by
a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the
appropriate box:
x
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
¨
|
Confidential,
for use of the Commission
|
|
|
|
|
only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
¨ |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¨
|
Soliciting
Material Under Rule 14a-12
|
|
|
|
Genta
Incorporated
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
|
No
fee required.
|
|
|
¨
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
|
|
¨
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
¨
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount
previously paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENTA
INCORPORATED
200
Connell Drive
Berkeley
Heights, NJ 07922
908-286-9800
April 30,
2010
Dear
Stockholder:
You are
cordially invited to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Genta Incorporated on
Tuesday June 15, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at The Madison Hotel, One
Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960.
The
accompanying notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders outlines the matters to be
brought before the meeting, and the accompanying Proxy Statement discusses these
matters in greater detail. The notice and the Proxy Statement have been made a
part of this invitation.
Whether or not you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting, we urge you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card
and return it at your earliest convenience. No postage need be affixed if
you use the enclosed envelope and it is mailed in the United States. You may
also vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. If you have any
questions or need assistance in completing the proxy card, please contact
Investor Relations at the telephone number above.
We are
mailing this Proxy Statement and a form of proxy on or about May 7,
2010.
Our Board
of Directors and management look forward to seeing you at the Annual
Meeting.
Important
notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting to
be held on June 15, 2010.
In
accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are
providing this notice to our stockholders to advise them of the availability on
the Internet of our proxy materials related to our Annual Meeting. The new rules
allow companies to provide access to proxy materials in one of two ways. Because
we have elected to utilize the “full set delivery” option, we are delivering our
proxy materials to our stockholders under the “traditional” method, by providing
paper copies, as well as providing access to our proxy materials on a publicly
accessible Web site.
Our Proxy Statement and
proxy and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
are enclosed. Our Proxy Statement and proxy and our Annual Report on Form 10-K
are available on our Web site at http://www.genta.com.
Sincerely
yours,
|
|
/s/
RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
GENTA
INCORPORATED
200
Connell Drive
Berkeley
Heights, NJ 07922
908-286-9800
Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
April 30,
2010
The
Annual Meeting of stockholders of Genta Incorporated, a Delaware corporation,
will be held on June 15, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at The Madison Hotel,
One Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960 for the following
purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect four Directors;
|
|
2.
|
To
authorize our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split of our
outstanding Common Stock at any ratio up to
1-for-100;
|
|
3.
|
To
approve an amendment and restatement of our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan to
change the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under
our plan
|
|
4.
|
To
ratify the appointment of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December
31, 2010; and
|
|
5.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting.
|
All
stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Attendance at
the Annual Meeting is limited to our stockholders and one guest. Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on April 26, 2010, the Record
Date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Your
Vote Is Important. Whether Or Not You
Plan To
Attend The
Annual Meeting, We Urge You To Vote
Electronically Via The Internet. You May Also Complete, Date And Sign
The Enclosed Proxy Card And Return It
Or Vote By
Telephone.
By
order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
/s/
GARY SIEGEL
|
|
Gary
Siegel
|
Interim
Corporate Secretary
|
YOU CAN
VOTE IN ONE OF THREE WAYS:
(1) Visit
the Web site noted on your proxy card to vote via the
Internet,
(2) Use
the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card to vote by phone,
or
(3) Sign,
date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope to vote by
mail.
GENTA
INCORPORATED
200
Connell Drive
Berkeley
Heights, NJ 07922
908-286-9800
PROXY
STATEMENT
This
Proxy Statement contains information related to an Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Genta Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, to be held on June
15, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at The Madison Hotel, One Convent Road,
Morristown, New Jersey 07960 and at any postponements or adjournments
thereof. This Proxy
Statement and the enclosed proxy card are being mailed to our stockholders on or
about May 7, 2010.
In this
Proxy Statement, “Genta”, “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Genta
Incorporated.
The
Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect four Directors;
|
|
2.
|
To authorize our Board of
Directors to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding Common Stock
at any ratio up to
1-for-100;
|
|
3.
|
To
approve an amendment and restatement of our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan to
change the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under
our plan;
|
|
4.
|
To
ratify the appointment of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December
31, 2010; and
|
|
5.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting.
|
VOTING
AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Revocability
of Proxies
You can
revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by timely delivery of a
properly executed, later-dated proxy (including a telephone or Internet vote),
by delivering a written revocation of your proxy to our Corporate Secretary, or
by voting at the Annual Meeting. The method by which you vote by
proxy will in no way limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you
decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a
bank or brokerage firm, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from
the bank or broker, to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Voting
Rights
Only
holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the Record
Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of
common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters to be voted upon at the
Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date will
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be counted as shares that are present for purposes of determining
a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial
owner does not have discretionary voting power on a matter and has not received
instructions from the beneficial owner.
For
Proposal 1, the election of a Director requires a plurality of the votes
present, either in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting. For election of
Directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from a nominee; votes that
are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect.
Brokers may not vote on this proposal without instructions from the beneficial
owner of the shares being voted.
For
Proposal 2, the authorization of our Board of Directors to
effect a reverse stock split in any ratio
up to 1-for-100 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of our Common Stock. Please note that the timing and ratio of any reverse stock
split approved by our Board of Directors will require the prior approval of the
holders of 66 2/3% of the combined principal amount of the then
outstanding 2010 Notes (as defined below). Brokers may vote on this proposal;
however, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote
"against" this proposal, even if they do not receive instructions from the
beneficial owner.
For
Proposal 3, the approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan to change the number of shares authorized for issuance requires a
majority of the votes present, either in person or by proxy at the Annual
Meeting. Brokers may not vote on this proposal without instructions from the
beneficial owner of the shares being voted.
For
Proposal 4, the ratification of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31,
2010 requires a majority of the votes present, either in person or by proxy at
the Annual Meeting. Brokers may vote on this proposal; however, abstentions and
broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote "against" this proposal, even if
they do not receive instructions from the beneficial owner.
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on April 26, 2010, the Record
Date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, and at any
postponements or adjournments thereof. As of April 26, 2010,
xxx,xxx,xxx of our common stock, par value $.001 per share, were issued and
outstanding, 7,700 shares of our convertible Series A Preferred Stock, par value
$.001 per share, were outstanding, and $x.x million of June 2008 Senior
Convertible Promissory Notes (“June 2008 Notes”), $x.x million of
April 2009 Senior Convertible Promissory Notes (“April 2009 Notes”), $x.x million
of July 2009 Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes (“July 2009 Notes”), $x.x million of
September 2009 Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes (“September 2009 Notes”), $10.0
million of March 2010 Unsecured Senior Convertible B Notes (“B Notes”), $10.0
million of March 2010 Unsecured Senior Convertible C Notes (“C Notes”) and $5.0
million of March 2010 Senior Secured Convertible D Notes (“D Notes”) were
outstanding. The June 2008 Notes, April 2009 Notes, July 2009 Notes
and September 2009 Notes are collectively referred to as the “Prior
Notes”. The B Notes, C Notes and D Notes are
collectively referred to as the “2010 Notes”. Holders of our common
stock are entitled to one vote per share for each proposal presented at the
Annual Meeting. Holders of our Series A
Preferred Stock are not entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of all
of the Prior Notes and the 2010 Notes are not
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
How
to Vote; How Proxies Work
Our Board
of Directors is asking for your proxy. Whether or not you plan
to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy as you can always
change your vote at the Annual Meeting. Please complete the
proxy card by voting on the Internet, calling the toll-free telephone number on
the proxy card, or complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it
at your earliest convenience. We will bear the costs
incidental to the solicitation and obtaining of proxies, including the costs of
reimbursing banks, brokers and other nominees for forwarding proxy materials to
beneficial owners of our capital stock. Proxies may be solicited
by our officers and employees, without extra compensation, by mail, telephone,
telefax, personal interviews and other methods of communication. In addition, we have
retained Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services to act as our proxy
solicitor in connection with the Annual Meeting. We have agreed to pay
that firm $7,000 plus reasonable out of pocket expenses, for proxy solicitation
services.
At the
Annual Meeting, and at any postponements and adjournments thereof, all shares
entitled to vote and represented by properly executed proxies received prior to
the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be voted as instructed on those
proxies. If no
instructions are indicated on a properly executed proxy, the shares will be
voted FOR Proposal 2 and Proposal 4. Brokers may only vote on Proposal 1 and
Proposal 3 if instructions are indicated on a properly executed
proxy.
Questions and
Answers
|
·
|
Election
of four Directors (Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D., Christopher P. Parios,
Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D. and Douglas G. Watson) for a term ending at the
next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders;
|
|
·
|
Authorizing
our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding
Common Stock at any ratio up to 1-for-100, subject to the approval of holders of 66 2/3%
of the combined principal amount of the then outstanding 2010
Notes;
|
|
·
|
Approval
of a change in the number of shares authorized for our 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan; and
|
|
·
|
Ratification
of the appointment of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December
31, 2010.
|
Q.
|
Who
is entitled to vote?
|
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date of April 26,
2010 are entitled to vote shares held by such stockholders on that date at the
Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share entitles its holder to cast
one vote.
Vote By Internet: Visit the
Web site noted on your proxy card to vote via the Internet.
Vote By Mail: Sign
and date the proxy card you receive and return it in the enclosed stamped,
self-addressed envelope.
Vote By
Telephone: If you are a stockholder of record (that is, if you
hold your stock in your own name), you may vote by telephone by following the
instructions on your proxy card. The telephone number is toll-free,
so voting by telephone is at no cost to you. If you vote by
telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.
Vote in
Person: Sign and date the proxy you receive and return it in
person at the Annual Meeting.
If your
shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record (i.e.,
in “street name”), you will receive instructions from the holder of record that
you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Telephone and
Internet voting will be offered to stockholders owning shares through most banks
and brokers.
Q.
|
Can
I access the proxy materials
electronically?
|
This
Proxy Statement, the proxy card, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2009 are available on our website at
www.genta.com.
Q.
|
Can
I change my vote or revoke my
proxy?
|
Yes. You
may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy is
exercised. If you submitted your proxy by mail, you must (a) file
with the Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation or (b) timely
deliver a valid, later-dated proxy. If you submitted your proxy by
telephone, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy with a later telephone
proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of
revoking a proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Corporate
Secretary before the proxy is exercised or you vote by written ballot at the
Annual Meeting.
Q.
|
What
is the process for admission to the Annual
Meeting?
|
If you
are a record owner of your shares (i.e., your shares are held in
your name), you must show government issued identification. Your name
will be verified against the stockholder list. If you hold your
shares through a bank, broker or trustee, you must also bring a copy of your
latest bank or broker statement showing your ownership of your shares as of the
Record Date.
Q.
|
What
constitutes a quorum?
|
The
presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date will
constitute a quorum. As of April 26, 2010, there were xxx,xxx,xxx
outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting.
Abstentions
and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is
present at the Annual Meeting.
Q.
|
What
vote is required to approve each
item?
|
For
Proposal 1, the election of a Director requires a plurality of the votes
present, either in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting. For election of
Directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from a nominee; votes that
are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect.
Brokers may not vote on this proposal without instructions from the beneficial
owner of the shares being voted.
For
Proposal 2, the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares of our
Common Stock is required to authorize our Board of Directors to effect a reverse
stock split of our outstanding Common Stock at any ratio up to 1-for-100;
however, please note that the timing and ratio of any reverse stock
split approved by our Board of Directors will require the prior approval of the
holders of 66 2/3% of the combined principal amount of the then
outstanding 2010 Notes. Brokers may vote on this proposal; however, abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote "against" this proposal,
even if they do not receive instructions from the beneficial owner.
For
Proposal 3, the approval of a change in the number of shares authorized for
issuance by the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan requires a majority of the votes
present, either in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Brokers may not
vote on this proposal without instructions from the beneficial owner of the
shares being voted.
For
Proposal 4, the ratification of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31,
2010 requires a majority of the votes present, either in person or by proxy at
the Annual Meeting. Brokers may vote on this proposal; however, abstentions and
broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote "against" this proposal, even if
they do not receive instructions from the beneficial owner.
Q.
|
What
happens if I do not instruct my broker how to vote on the
proxy?
|
If you do
not instruct your broker how to vote, your broker will vote your shares for you
at his or her discretion on routine matters such as the approval of a reverse
stock split or ratification of independent registered public accounting
firm.
Q.
|
What
are the recommendations of the Board of
Directors?
|
The Board
of Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote:
|
·
|
FOR each of the nominees
for our Board of Directors.
|
|
·
|
FOR the authorization of
our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split in any ratio
up to 1-for-100.
|
|
·
|
FOR the approval of the
amendment and restatement of our 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
|
·
|
FOR the ratification of
Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ended December 31,
2010.
|
With
respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the
proxies will vote as recommended by our Board of Directors or, if no
recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
PROPOSAL
ONE
Election
Of Directors
At the
2010 Annual Meeting, four Directors will be elected to serve a
one-year term expiring at the next Annual Meeting of stockholders and until
each Director’s successor shall have been elected and
qualified.
Our Board
has nominated Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D., Christopher P. Parios, Daniel D.
Von Hoff, M.D. and Douglas G. Watson for election as Directors to serve until
the 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders. All nominees are currently members
of the Board.
Each
nominee has expressed his or her willingness to serve as a Director if elected,
and we know of no reason why any nominee would be unable to serve. If a nominee
becomes unavailable before the election, the proxies may be voted for one or
more substitute nominees designated by the Board, or the Board may decide to
reduce the number of Directors.
Set forth
below is certain information with respect to each nominee for
Director.
Nominees
for Election at the Annual Meeting
Raymond P.
Warrell, Jr.,
M.D., 60, has
been our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since December 1999
and our Chairman since January 2001. From December 1999 to May 2003, he was also
our President. From 1978 to 1999, Dr. Warrell was associated with the Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, where he held tenured positions as
Member, Attending Physician, and Associate Physician-in-Chief, and with the Joan
and Sanford Weill Medical College of Cornell University, where he was Professor
of Medicine. Dr. Warrell also has more than 20 years of development and
consulting experience in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology products. He was a
co-founder and chairman of the scientific advisory board of PolaRx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., which developed Trisenox®, a drug for the treatment of
acute promyelocytic leukemia, which is now marketed by Cephalon, Inc. Dr.
Warrell holds or has filed numerous patents and patent applications for
biomedical therapeutic or diagnostic agents. He has published more than 100
peer-reviewed papers and more than 240 book chapters and abstracts, most of
which are focused upon drug development in tumor-related diseases. Dr. Warrell
is a member of the American Society of Clinical Investigation, the American
Society of Hematology, the American Association for Cancer Research and the
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Among many awards, he has received the
U.S. Public Health Service Award for Exceptional Achievement in Orphan Drug
Development from the FDA. He obtained a B.S. in Chemistry from Emory University,
a M.D. from the Medical College of Georgia, and a M.B.A. from Columbia
University Graduate School of Business. Dr. Warrell is married to Dr. Loretta M.
Itri, President, Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer of
Genta.
The Board
believes that Dr. Warrell's leadership of Genta since December 1999, extensive
knowledge in the field of oncology and biotechnology products, as well as his
educational and business background, position him to make valuable contributions
to the Company as the Chairman of its Board of Directors.
Christopher P.
Parios, 69, has been a member of our Board since September 2005. Mr.
Parios has more than 37 years of pharmaceutical industry experience, including
product development, marketing and promotion, strategy and tactic development,
and managing pharmaco-economic and reimbursement issues. He has worked with many
of the major companies in the pharmaceutical industry including
Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ortho-McNeil, Pfizer, Novartis, Schering Plough, Janssen,
Ortho Biotech, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. For the period 1997 to May of 2008, Mr.
Parios was Executive Director of The Dominion Group, an independent healthcare
consulting firm that specializes in market research, strategic planning, and
competitive intelligence monitoring. In this role, he was responsible for the
full range of market research, consulting, and business planning activities to
facilitate informed business decisions for clients regarding product
development, acquisitions, product positioning, and promotion. Mr. Parios
continues to consult with the Dominion Group on a part-time basis. Previously,
Mr. Parios was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Ferguson
Communication Group, as well as Vice Chairman of the parent company,
CommonHealth USA, a leading full-service communications resource for the
healthcare industry. Mr. Parios was a partner in Pracon, Inc., a health-care
marketing consulting firm from 1982 to 1991, and helped engineer the sale of
that firm to Reed-Elsevier in 1989. Over a 20-year period, Mr. Parios held
progressively senior positions at Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., most recently as
Director of New Product Planning and Regulatory Affairs Management. This group
established the project management system for drug development at Roche and
coordinated developmental activities for such products as Versed®, Rocephin®,
Roferon®, Accutane®, Rimadyl®, and Tegison®. Mr. Parios was also a member of the
corporate team responsible for domestic and international product and technology
licensing activities.
The Board
believes that Mr. Parios’ 37 years of pharmaceutical industry experience,
including product development, marketing and promotion, strategy and tactic
development, and managing pharmaco-economic and reimbursement issues, position
him to make valuable contributions to the Company as a member of its Board of
Directors.
Daniel D. Von
Hoff, M.D., F.A.C.P., 62, has been a member of our Board since January
2000. Since February 2002, he has been Physician in Chief and Director of
Translational Research at Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) in
Phoenix, Arizona. He is also Chief Scientific Officer for US Oncology since
January 2003 and he is also the Chief Scientific Officer, Scottsdale Clinical
Research Institute since November 2005. Dr. Von Hoff’s major interest is in the
development of new anticancer agents, both in the clinic and in the laboratory.
He and his colleagues were involved in the beginning of the development of many
of the agents now used routinely, including: mitoxantrone, fludarabine,
paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, CPT-11, and others. At present, he and his
colleagues are concentrating on the development of molecularly targeted
therapies. Dr. Von Hoff’s laboratory interests and contributions have been in
the area of in vitro drug sensitivity testing to individualize treatment for the
patient. He and his laboratory are now concentrating on discovery of new targets
in pancreatic cancer. Dr. Von Hoff has published more than 531 papers, 129 book
chapters, and more than 891 abstracts. Dr. Von Hoff was appointed to President
Bush’s National Cancer Advisory Board for June 2004 – March 2010. Dr. Von Hoff
is the past President of the American Association for Cancer Research, a Fellow
of the American College of Physicians, and a member and past board member of the
American Society of Clinical Oncology. He is a founder of ILEX™ Oncology, Inc.
(acquired by Genzyme). He is founder and the Editor Emeritus of Investigational New Drugs –
The Journal of New Anticancer Agents; and, Editor-in-Chief of Molecular Cancer
Therapeutics.
The Board
believes that Dr. Von Hoff’s background in the development of anti-cancer
compounds, along with his extensive educational and business background,
position him to make valuable contributions to the Company as a member of its
Board of Directors.
Douglas G.
Watson, 65, has been a member of our Board since April 2002 and was
appointed Vice Chairman of our Board and Lead Director in March 2005. From 1999
through the present, Mr. Watson is the founder and has served as Chief Executive
Officer of Pittencrieff Glen Associates, a leadership and management-consulting
firm. Prior to taking early retirement in 1999, Mr. Watson spent 33 years with
Geigy/Ciba-Geigy/Novartis, during which time he held a variety of positions in
the United Kingdom, Switzerland and the United States. From 1986 to 1996, he was
President of Ciba U.S. Pharmaceuticals Division, and in 1996 he was appointed
President & Chief Executive Officer of Ciba-Geigy Corporation. During this
ten-year period, Mr. Watson was an active member of the Pharmaceutical Research
& Manufacturers Association board in Washington, DC. Mr. Watson became
President & Chief Executive Officer of Novartis Corporation in 1997 when the
merger of Ciba-Geigy & Sandoz was approved by the Federal Trade Commission.
Mr. Watson is currently Chairman of the Board of OraSure Technologies Inc., and
Chairman of the Board of Javelin Pharmaceuticals Inc. He also serves on the
boards of Dendreon Corporation and BioMimetic Therapeutics Inc.
The Board
believes that Mr. Watson’s 33 years of experience at Geigy/Ciba-Geigy/Novartis,
including being President of Ciba US Pharmacueticals Division and President
& Chief Executive Officer of Ciba-Geigy Corporation, including his
experience as a director on several other biopharmaceutical companies position
him to make valuable contributions to the Company as a member of its Board of
Directors.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The
Board unanimously recommends that you vote ‘‘FOR’’ the election of each nominee
as Director.
PROPOSAL
TWO
Board
Authorization To Effect Reverse Stock Split
Our Board
of Directors is proposing that our stockholders approve a proposal to authorize
our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split of all outstanding shares
of our Common Stock, at any ratio up to 1-for-100; however, please note that
the timing and ratio of any reverse stock
split approved by our Board of Directors will require the prior approval of the
holders of 66 2/3% of the combined principal
amount of the then outstanding 2010 Notes. If this proposal is approved,
our Board of Directors would have the authority to effect a reverse stock split
at any time before our 2011 annual meeting,
subject to the approval of the holders of the 2010 Notes described above.
Our Board of Directors believes that approval of a proposal providing the Board
of Directors with this generalized grant of authority with respect to setting
the split ratio, rather than mere approval of a pre-defined reverse stock split,
will give the Board of Directors the flexibility to set the ratio in accordance
with current market conditions and therefore allow the Board of Directors to act
in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.
If our
stockholders grant the Board of Directors the authority to effect a reverse
stock split, we would file a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with the Delaware Secretary of State
to effect the proposed reverse stock split, in substantially the form attached
to this proxy statement as Annex A, the text of
which may be altered for any changes required by the Delaware Secretary of State
and changes deemed necessary or advisable by the Board of Directors. Our Board
of Directors has approved and declared advisable the proposed Certificate of
Amendment. If the proposed reverse stock split is implemented, then the number
of issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock would be
reduced.
Purpose
of Proposed Reverse Stock Split
According
to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement
dated as of March 5, 2010 (the “March 2010 Purchase Agreement”) under which we
issued and sold the 2010 Notes, if we do not effect a reverse stock split
on or prior to September 17, 2010, we will
be obligated to pay each investor who is a signatory to the March 2010 Purchase
Agreement a cash payment equal to 0.75% of the principal amount of all B Notes
and C Notes purchased by such investor for each day from September 18, 2010
until the reverse stock split is effected; provided, however, that we are not
obligated to make any such payments in excess of 100% of the principal amount of
the B Notes and C Notes purchased by the investors in the March 2010 Financing
(as defined below).
Under the March 2010 Purchase Agreement we agreed
to issue $25 million of units (the “2010 Units”), each 2010 Unit consisting of
(i) 40% of a B Note, (ii) 40% of a C Note and (iii) 20% of a D Note. The March 2010 Financing
closed on March 9, 2010. In connection with the sale of the 2010
Units, we also agreed to issue warrants (the “Debt Warrants”) to purchase senior
unsecured convertible notes (the “E Notes”) in an amount equal to 40% of the
purchase price paid for each such 2010 Unit. The issuance of
the 2010 Units and Debt Warrants in
exchange for $25 million is referred to herein as the “March 2010 Financing”. In
addition, in connection with the March 2010
Financing, the holders of two -thirds of the outstanding options to purchase additional April 2009 Notes issued
in connection with that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April
2, 2009, by and among the Company and the Purchasers listed on Exhibit A
thereto, as amended (the “Purchase Options”), and the holders of two-thirds of
the outstanding rights to purchase additional April 2009 Notes issued under that
certain Consent Agreement dated as of April 2, 2009, by and among the Company
and the Purchasers listed on Exhibit A thereto, as amended (the “Purchase
Rights”) agreed to amend the Purchase Rights and Purchase Options to,
among other things, provide for the issuance of senior unsecured convertible
notes in substantially the same form as the B Notes upon exercise of the
Purchase Rights and Purchase Options (the “F Notes”). The 2010 Notes,
the E Notes and the F Notes are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
“Notes”.
Since the
conversion price of the Notes was less than the current conversion prices for all outstanding Prior Notes, the
conversion price for the Prior Notes reset upon the closing of the March 2010
Financing to $0.01 per share of Common Stock, pursuant to the terms of the Prior
Notes. With the reset in the conversion prices of all of our Prior Notes, plus
the additional shares of common stock that the Notes convert into, we do not have sufficient authorized shares of Common Stock to effect
the conversion of all outstanding Notes and Prior Notes. As a result, the
Board of Directors is now seeking stockholder authorization to effect the
reverse stock split.
In
addition, the Board of Directors is also proposing the reverse stock split in
order to attempt to reduce the number of issued and outstanding shares and
to increase the per share trading value of our Common Stock. Our Board of
Directors believes that the reverse stock split would be beneficial in this
regard because it would increase the price of our Common Stock and decrease the
number of issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock.
An
increase in the per share trading value of our Common Stock would be beneficial
because it would:
|
·
|
improve
the perception of our Common Stock as an investment
security;
|
|
·
|
reset
our stock price to more normalized trading levels in the face of
potentially extended market
dislocation;
|
|
·
|
appeal
to a broader range of investors to generate greater investor interest in
us; and
|
|
·
|
reduce
stockholder transaction costs because investors would pay lower commission
to trade a fixed dollar amount of our stock if our stock price were higher
than they would if our stock price were
lower.
|
A
decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock
would be beneficial for the Company because by doing so, we will have more
shares available for future issuance. Specifically, as we are required to
reserve for future issuance any shares underlying the Notes and the Prior Notes, effecting a
reverse stock split will reduce the number of issued and outstanding shares,
thereby increasing the number of shares available for future issuance upon
conversion of the convertible notes (as further discussed
below).
You
should consider that, although our Board of Directors believes that a reverse
stock split will in fact increase the price of our Common Stock, in many cases,
because of variables outside of a company’s control (such as market volatility,
investor response to the news of a proposed reverse stock split and the general
economic environment), the market price of a company's shares of common stock
may in fact decline in value after a reverse stock split. You should
also keep in mind that the implementation of a reverse stock split does not have
an effect on the actual or intrinsic value of our business or a stockholder's
proportional ownership in our Company. However, should the overall
value of our Common Stock decline after the proposed reverse stock split, then
the actual or intrinsic value of the shares of our Common Stock held by you will
also proportionately decrease as a result of the overall decline in
value.
Potential
Effects of the Proposed Reverse Stock Split
The
immediate effect of a reverse stock split would be to reduce the number of
shares of our Common Stock outstanding and to increase the trading price of our
Common Stock. Notwithstanding the decrease in the number of outstanding shares
following the proposed reverse stock split, our Board of Directors does not
intend for this transaction to be the first step in a “going private
transaction” within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act.
However,
we cannot predict the effect of any reverse stock split upon the market price of
our Common Stock over an extended period, and in many cases, the market value of
a company’s Common Stock following a reverse stock split declines. We cannot
assure you that the trading price of our Common Stock after the reverse stock
split will rise in inverse proportion to the reduction in the number of shares
of our Common Stock outstanding as a result of the reverse stock split. Also, we
cannot assure you that a reverse stock split would lead to a sustained increase
in the trading price of our Common Stock. The trading price of our Common Stock
may change due to a variety of other factors, including our operating results
and other factors related to our business and general market
conditions.
Examples of Potential Reverse Stock
Split at Various Ratios. The table below provides examples of reverse
stock splits at various ratios up to 1-for-100:
Shares
outstanding at
April
26, 2010
|
|
Reverse
Stock Split Ratio
|
|
Shares
outstanding
after
Reverse Stock Split
|
|
Reduction
in
Shares
Outstanding
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-2
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
50%
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-5
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
80%
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-10
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
90%
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-25
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
96%
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-50
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
98%
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
1-for-100
|
|
xxx,xxx,xxx
|
|
99%
|
The
resulting decrease in the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding could
potentially adversely affect the liquidity of our Common Stock, especially in
the case of larger block trades.
Effects on Ownership by Individual
Stockholders. If we implement a reverse stock split, the
number of shares of our Common Stock held by each stockholder would be reduced
by multiplying the number of shares held immediately before the reverse stock
split by the appropriate ratio and then rounding down to the nearest whole
share. We would pay cash to each stockholder in lieu of any fractional interest
in a share to which each stockholder would otherwise be entitled as a result of
the reverse stock split, as described in further detail below. The reverse stock
split would not affect any stockholder's percentage ownership interest in our
Company or proportionate voting power, except to the extent that interests in
fractional shares would be paid in cash.
Effect on Restricted Stock Units,
Warrants, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Convertible Promissory
Notes. In addition, we would adjust all outstanding shares of
any restricted stock units, warrants, preferred stock and convertible notes
entitling the holders to purchase shares of our Common Stock as a result of the
reverse stock split, as required by the terms of these securities. In
particular, we would reduce the conversion ratio for each instrument, and would
increase the exercise price in accordance with the terms of each instrument and
based on the 1-for-2, up to 1-for-100 ratio of the reverse stock split (i.e.,
the number of shares issuable under such securities would decrease by 50%, up to
99%, respectively, and the exercise price per share would be multiplied by 2, up
to 100, respectively). However, please note that the timing and ratio of any reverse stock split
approved by our Board of Directors will require the prior approval of the
holders of 66 2/3% of the combined principal
amount of the then outstanding 2010 Notes. Also, we would reduce the
number of shares reserved for issuance under our existing 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan proportionately based on the ratio of the reverse stock split. A reverse
stock split would not otherwise affect any of the rights currently accruing to
holders of our Common Stock or warrants exercisable for our Common
Stock.
Other Effects on Outstanding
Shares. If we implement a reverse stock split, the rights pertaining to
the outstanding shares of our Common Stock would be unchanged after the reverse
stock split. Each share of our Common Stock issued following the reverse stock
split would be fully paid and nonassessable.
The
reverse stock split would result in some stockholders owning "odd-lots" of less
than 100 shares of our Common Stock. Brokerage commissions and other costs of
transactions in odd-lots are generally higher than the costs of transactions in
"round-lots" of even multiples of 100 shares.
Our
Common Stock is currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, we are subject to the periodic reporting and
other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act. The proposed reverse stock
split would not affect the registration of our Common Stock under the Securities
Exchange Act.
Authorized
Shares of Stock
The reverse stock split would affect
all issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock and outstanding rights to
acquire Common Stock. We will not change the number of shares of Common Stock
currently authorized. However, upon the effectiveness of the reverse
stock split, the number of authorized shares of Common Stock that are not issued
or outstanding would increase due to the reduction in the number of shares of
Common Stock issued and outstanding as a result of the reverse stock
split.
As of
April 26, 2010, we had (i) 6,000,000,000 shares of authorized Common Stock, of
which xxx,xxx,xxx shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, were issued
and outstanding, and (ii) 7,700 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock par value $.001 per share, were outstanding (iii) approximately
$x.x million outstanding in principal amount of
June 2008 Notes convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion
rate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock for every $1,000.00 of principal, (iv)
approximately $x.x million outstanding in
principal amount of April 2009 Notes convertible into shares of Common
Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock for every $1,000.00
of principal, (v) $x.x million outstanding in
principal amount of July 2009 Notes convertible into shares of Common
Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock for every $1,000.00
of principal, (vi) $x.x million outstanding in
principal amount of September 2009 Notes convertible into shares of
Common Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock for every
$1,000.00 of principal, (vii) $10.0 million outstanding in principal amount of B Notes
convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares
of Common Stock for every $1,000.00 of principal, (viii) $10.0 million outstanding in principal amount of C Notes
convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares
of Common Stock for every $1,000.00 of principal, (ix) $5.0 million outstanding in principal amount of D Notes
convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares
of Common Stock for every $1,000.00 of principal, (x) $x.x million outstanding in principal amount of F Notes
convertible into shares of Common Stock at a conversion rate of 100,000 shares
of Common Stock for every $1,000.00 of principal, and (xi) 2,000,000 shares of
authorized Series G Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, of which no shares
were issued and outstanding. Authorized but unissued shares will be available
for issuance, and we may issue such shares in the future. If we issue additional
shares, the ownership interest of holders of Common Stock will be
diluted.
We will
reserve for issuance any authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock that
would be made available as a result of the proposed reverse stock
split.
There are
currently not enough shares of Common Stock authorized under our certificate of
incorporation to cover the shares underlying the 2010 Notes and therefore any
authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock that would be made available as a
result of the proposed reverse stock split will be reserved for issuance upon
conversion of the 2010 Notes.
We do not
have any plans, arrangements or understandings for the remaining portion of the
authorized but unissued shares that will be available following the reverse
stock split that will not be reserved for conversion of the 2010
Notes.
Procedure
for Effecting the Proposed Stock Split and Exchange of Stock
Certificates
If
stockholders approve the proposal, we will file with the Delaware Secretary of
State a Certificate of Amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended. The reverse stock split will become effective at the time and on the
date of filing of, or at such later time as is specified in, the Certificate of
Amendment, which we refer to as the “effective time” and “effective date,”
respectively. Beginning at the effective time, each certificate representing
shares of Common Stock will be deemed for all corporate purposes to evidence
ownership of the number of whole shares into which the shares previously
represented by the certificate were combined pursuant to the reverse stock
split.
Upon a
reverse stock split, we intend to treat stockholders holding our Common Stock in
“street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as
registered stockholders whose shares are registered in their names. Banks,
brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the reverse stock split
for their beneficial holders holding our Common Stock in “street name.” However,
these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than
registered stockholders for processing the reverse stock split. If you hold your
shares with a bank, broker or other nominee and if you have any questions in
this regard, we encourage you to contact your nominee.
Following
any reverse stock split, stockholders holding physical certificates must
exchange those certificates for new certificates and a cash payment in lieu of
any fractional shares.
Our
transfer agent will advise registered stockholders of the procedures to be
followed to exchange certificates in a letter of transmittal to be sent to
stockholders. No new certificates will be issued to a stockholder until the
stockholder has surrendered the stockholder’s outstanding certificate(s),
together with the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal, to the
transfer agent. Any old shares submitted for transfer, whether pursuant to a
sale, other disposition or otherwise, will automatically be exchanged for new
shares. Stockholders should not destroy any stock certificate(s) and should not
submit any certificate(s) until requested to do so.
Fractional
Shares
We would
not issue fractional shares in connection with the reverse stock
split. Instead, any fractional share resulting from the reverse stock
split because the stockholder owns a number of shares not evenly divisible by
the ratio would instead receive cash upon surrender to the exchange agent of the
certificates and a properly completed and executed letter of transmittal. The
cash amount to be paid to each stockholder would be equal to the resulting
fractional interest in one share of our Common Stock to which the stockholder
would otherwise be entitled, multiplied by the closing trading price of our
Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the effective date of the
reverse stock split. We do not anticipate that the aggregate cash amount paid by
the Company for fractional interests will be material to the
Company.
No
Appraisal Rights
No
appraisal rights are available under the Delaware General Corporation Law or
under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, or by-laws with
respect to the reverse stock split. There may exist other rights or actions
under state law for stockholders who are aggrieved by reverse stock splits
generally.
Accounting
Consequences
The par
value of our Common Stock would remain unchanged at $0.001 per share after the
reverse stock split. Also, our capital account would remain unchanged, and we do
not anticipate that any other accounting consequences would arise as a result of
the reverse stock split.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split
The
following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the reverse stock split to holders of our shares. This summary is based on the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder, and administrative rulings and court decisions in effect
as of the date of this document, all of which may be subject to change, possibly
with retroactive effect. This summary only addresses holders who hold their
shares as capital assets within the meaning of the Code and does not address all
aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to holders subject
to special tax treatment, such as financial institutions, dealers in securities,
insurance companies, foreign persons and tax-exempt entities. In addition, this
summary does not consider the effects of any applicable state, local, foreign or
other tax laws.
We have
not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or
the IRS, or an opinion from counsel with respect to the U.S. federal income tax
consequences discussed below. There can be no assurance that the tax
consequences discussed below would be accepted by the IRS or a court. The tax
treatment of the reverse stock split to holders may vary depending upon a
holder’s particular facts and circumstances.
We urge
holders to consult with their own tax advisors as to any U.S. federal, state,
local or foreign tax consequences applicable to them that could result from the
reverse stock split.
Except as
described below with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares, the
receipt of Common Stock in the reverse stock split should not result in any
taxable gain or loss to a holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The
aggregate tax basis of the Common Stock received by a holder as a result of the
reverse stock split (including the basis of any fractional share to which a
holder is entitled) will be equal to the aggregate basis of the existing Common
Stock exchanged for such stock. A holder’s holding period for the Common Stock
received in the reverse stock split will include the holding period of the
Common Stock exchanged therefor.
A holder
who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Common Stock will be treated
as first receiving such fractional share and then receiving cash in redemption
of such fractional share. A holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss
on such deemed redemption in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount of cash received and the adjusted basis of such fractional
share.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of
the proposal to authorize our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock
split.
PROPOSAL
THREE
Approval
Of An Amendment And Restatement Of Our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan To Change The
Number
Of Shares Authorized Under The Plan
On April
1, 2010, the Board approved, subject to stockholder approval at the Annual
Meeting, an amendment and restatement of our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, referred
to herein as the plan, that would change the total number of shares of Common
Stock authorized for issuance under the plan from 83,478,929 shares to
54,738,066 shares, a decrease of 28,740,863 shares so that the share reserve is
limited to 15% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on April 1, 2010. Under
the amended and restated Plan, the share reserve will be subsequently adjusted
on each of September 7, 2010, January 18, 2011 and May 3, 2011 to be equal to
15% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of each of
those dates respectively. This may result in an increase or decrease in the
share reserve. The Board has directed that the proposed amendment and
restatement be submitted to our stockholders for their approval.
The Board
believes that the availability of a Stock Incentive Plan is in the best
interests of our Company and our stockholders because the availability of an
adequate equity compensation program is an important factor in attracting and
retaining qualified officers, employees and directors essential to our success
and in aligning their long term interests with those of our stockholders. The
Plan is structured to provide us with flexibility in designing equity incentive
programs in an environment where a number of companies have moved from
traditional option grants to other stock or stock-based awards such as
restricted stock and restricted stock units. Accordingly, with the Plan, we will
have a broader array of equity incentives to utilize for purposes of attracting
and retaining the services of key individuals. We will continue to rely
significantly on equity incentives because we believe that such incentives are
necessary for us to remain competitive in the marketplace for executive talent
and other key employees. When the Plan was initially approved by the Board and
our stockholders in 2009, the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance under the Plan was targeted at 15% of fully diluted outstanding shares.
The objective of this amendment and restatement is to maintain the target
percentage, but to base that percentage on shares actually issued and
outstanding. Under this objective, the number of reserve shares will initially
decrease, as proposed, but the total reserve will be subject to three
adjustments during the period prior to the next annual meeting, which will
maintain that target percentage of reserve shares. These changes will permit us
to continue to operate the plan for the benefit of new participants (including
new hires or employees of acquired companies), as well as to allow additional
awards to current participants.
Under the
amended and restated Plan, there will also be a limit on the number of shares
for which incentive stock options under the federal tax laws may be granted. In
addition, the annual grant to non-employee directors scheduled to be made on the
date of the Annual Meeting will instead be made as soon as practicable on or
shortly after the first business day following the expiration of the lock-up
period under terms of the Company’s recently concluded financing
transaction
The
principal terms and provisions of the Plan as amended and restated are
summarized below. The summary, however, is not intended to be a complete
description of all the terms of the Plan and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the complete text of the Plan filed with this Proxy Statement as
Exhibit A. Any stockholder who wishes to obtain a copy of the actual plan
documents may do so upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at our
principal offices at 200 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey
07922.
Types of
Awards. The following types of awards may be granted under the
Plan: options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted stock units,
dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards. The
principal features of each type of award are described below.
Administration. The compensation
committee of our Board of Directors will have the authority to administer the
Plan. However, our Board of Directors may at any time make awards under the Plan
to individuals other than executive officers and non-employee Directors. The
term “plan administrator,” as used in this summary, will mean our compensation
committee or the Board, to the extent each such entity is acting within the
scope of its administrative authority under the Plan.
Eligibility. Officers and
employees, non-employee Directors, as well as independent consultants, advisors
and contractors, in our employ or service or in the employ or service of our
subsidiary companies (whether now existing or subsequently established) will be
eligible to participate in the Plan. As of April 26, 2010, approximately 20
employees (including 4 executive officers) and 3 non-employee Board members were
eligible to participate in the Plan.
Securities
Subject to Plan.
Subject to stockholder approval of this proposal, an aggregate of
54,738,066 shares of common stock will be reserved for issuance over the term of
the Plan. This number represents fifteen percent (15%)
of the outstanding shares of the Company as of April 1, 2010. The share reserve
will be subsequently adjusted on each of September 7, 2010, January 18, 2011 and
May 3, 2011 to be equal to 15% of the number of shares of common stock
issued and outstanding as of each of those dates respectively. If any award is
forfeited or any award otherwise terminates or is cancelled without the delivery
of shares of common stock, then the shares covered by such award or to which
such award relates shall again become available for transfer pursuant to awards
granted or to be granted under the Plan.
As of
April 26, 2010, 43,715,611 shares of common stock were subject to outstanding
restricted stock units under the Plan, 10,042,091 shares of common
stock have been issued under the Plan and 29,721,227 shares of common stock
remain available for issuance under the Plan (not including the decrease subject
to stockholder approval under this proposal).
There is
a limitation in the Plan, such that no participant may receive awards for more
than 28,000,000 shares of our common stock in any calendar year, subject to
adjustment for subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and similar
transactions. Stockholder approval of this proposal will also constitute
re-approval of that 28,000,000-share limitation for purposes of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”). Accordingly, such limitation
will assure that any deductions to which we would otherwise be entitled upon the
exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan
will not be subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax deductibility
of compensation paid per executive officer imposed under Section
162(m).
The
maximum number of shares of common stock for which options intended to be
incentive stock options under the federal tax laws may be granted may not exceed
54,738,066 shares, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits,
stock dividends and similar transactions.
The
shares of common stock issuable under the Plan may be drawn from shares of our
authorized but unissued common stock or from shares of our common stock that we
acquire, including shares purchased on the open market or in private
transactions.
Awards.
The plan administrator will have complete discretion to determine which
eligible individuals are to receive awards, the time or times when those awards
are to be granted, the number of shares subject to each such award, the vesting
and exercise schedule (if any) to be in effect for the award, the cash
consideration (if any) payable per share subject to the award, the settlement of
the awards, the maximum term for which the award is to remain outstanding and
the status of any granted option as either an incentive stock option or a
non-statutory option under the federal tax laws.
Stock
Options. Each granted option will have an exercise price per
share determined by the plan administrator, but the exercise price will not be
less than one hundred percent of the fair market value of the option shares on
the grant date. No granted option will have a term in excess of ten years. The
shares subject to each option will generally vest in one or more installments
over a specified period of service measured from the grant date or upon the
achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives. The plan
administrator may also grant reload options pursuant to which an optionee who
delivers shares of our common stock in payment of the exercise price of an
option will be granted an option for a number of shares equal to the number of
shares so delivered.
Upon
cessation of service, the optionee will have a limited period of time in which
to exercise his or her outstanding options to the extent exercisable for vested
shares. The plan administrator will have complete discretion to extend the
period following the optionee’s cessation of service during which his or her
outstanding options may be exercised, provide for continued vesting during the
applicable post-service exercise period and/or to accelerate the exercisability
or vesting of options in whole or in part. Such discretion may be exercised at
any time while the options remain outstanding.
Stock
Appreciation Rights. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation
right as to a specific number of shares of our common stock, the holder of that
right will receive in exchange an appreciation distribution from us in an amount
equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares of common stock
as to which those rights are exercised over (ii) the aggregate exercise price in
effect for those shares. The exercise price per share may not be less than the
fair market value per share of our common stock on the date the right is
granted. Stock appreciation rights may also be granted in conjunction with
options which provide the holders with the right to surrender the related option
grant for an appreciation distribution from us in an amount equal to the excess
of (i) the fair market value of the vested shares of our common stock subject to
the surrendered option over (ii) the aggregate exercise price payable for those
shares.
The
appreciation distribution on any exercised stock appreciation right will be paid
in (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock or (iii) a combination of cash and
shares of our common stock. Upon cessation of service with us, the holder of a
stock appreciation right will have a limited period of time in which to exercise
that right to the extent exercisable at that time. The plan administrator will
have complete discretion to extend the period following the holder’s cessation
of service during which his or her outstanding stock appreciation rights may be
exercised, provide for continued vesting during the applicable post-service
exercise period and/or to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of stock
appreciation rights in whole or in part. Such discretion may be exercised at any
time while the stock appreciation right remains outstanding.
Repricing
Prohibition. The
plan administrator may not implement any of the following repricing programs
without obtaining stockholder approval: (i) the cancellation of
outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in return for new options or
stock appreciation rights with a lower exercise price per share, (ii) the
cancellation of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights with exercise
prices per share in excess of the then current fair market value per share of
our common stock or (iii) the direct reduction of the exercise price in effect
for outstanding options or stock appreciation rights.
Stock-Based
Awards. Shares may be issued under the Plan subject to
performance or service-vesting requirements established by the plan
administrator. Shares may also be issued as a fully-vested bonus for past
services without any cash outlay required of the recipient. The plan
administrator may also grant other stock-based awards that entitle the holder to
receive shares of common stock or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based
on the value of the shares of common stock.
Restricted Stock
Units. Shares of our common stock may also be issued under the
Plan pursuant to restricted stock units which entitle the recipients to receive
those shares upon the attainment of designated performance goals or the
completion of a prescribed service period or upon the expiration of a designated
time period following the vesting of those units, including (without
limitation), a deferred distribution date following the termination of the
recipient’s service with us.
Dividend
Equivalent Rights. Dividend equivalent rights may be issued in
tandem with other awards made under the Plan. Each dividend
equivalent right award will represent the right to receive the economic
equivalent of each dividend or distribution which is made per issued and
outstanding share of common stock during the term the dividend equivalent right
remains outstanding. Payment of the amounts attributable to such dividend
equivalent rights may be made either concurrently with the actual dividend or
distribution made per issued and outstanding share of our common stock or may be
deferred to a later date. The plan administrator will determine whether such
payment will be made in cash, in shares of our common stock or in another form
and whether they will be conditional.
Director Grant
Program. Under the Plan,
our non-employee Board members will automatically receive the following grants
periodically as follows:
Initial
Grants. On July 16, 2009
(the "Initial Grant Date"), each non-employee Board member was granted an award
of 695,658 restricted stock units. Each individual who is first
elected or appointed as a non-employee Board member at any time thereafter will
automatically be granted on the date of such election or appointment, an award
in the form of shares of common stock. The number of shares subject
to such award will be equal to the lower of (i) 0.125% of the fully diluted
outstanding shares of the Company as of the date of such election or appointment
(as determined by the Company and rounded up to the nearest whole share) or (ii)
the number of shares subject to the awards granted to a Director on the Initial
Grant Date (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and
other similar events).
Annual
Grants. Except as otherwise described below with respect to 2010, on the
date of each annual stockholders meeting each individual who is at that time
serving as, and is to continue to serve as, a non-employee Board member will
automatically be granted an award (the “Annual Award”) in the form of shares of
common stock and/or options with a value equal to the Applicable Annual Amount.
For such purposes, the value of the Annual Award shall be calculated as
follows: (A) the value of an option share shall be equal to the fair
value of an option share as estimated on the date of grant under a valuation
model approved by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for purposes
of the Company’s financial statements under SFAS 123R (or any successor
provision); and (B) the value of a share subject to the award shall be equal to
the fair market value of per share of common stock on the award date. The
Applicable Annual Amount will be determined by the Compensation Committee on or
before the date of the grant, but in no event will such amount exceed
$100,000.00. Our Compensation Committee will have the sole discretion to
determine the amount and type of award for each year within the foregoing
limitations. The Annual Award for 2010 will be made as soon as practicable on or
shortly after the first business day following the expiration of the lock-up
period under terms of the Company’s recently concluded financing
transaction.
Vesting of Awards
and Issuance of Shares. The restricted stock units
granted on the Initial Grant Date vested on the date of the 2009 Annual Meeting.
The shares of common stock subject to each award granted to a newly-elected or
appointed non-employee Director and each Annual Award will be fully vested on
the date of grant.
Stock Awards.
The following table sets forth, as to our non-employee Directors and
Chief Executive Officer, our interim chief financial officer and our two other
executive officers, the number of shares of our common stock subject to
restricted stock unit awards granted from January 1, 2009 through April 26,
2010.
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Number of
Shares subject
to Restricted
Stock Unit
Grants
(#)
|
|
Non-employee
Directors
|
|
|
|
Christopher
P. Parios
|
|
|
695,658 |
|
Daniel
D. Von Hoff, M.D.
|
|
|
695,658 |
|
Douglas
G. Watson
|
|
|
695,658 |
|
All
current non-employee directors as a group
(3 directors)
|
|
|
2,086,974 |
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr. M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
26,474,679 |
|
Gary
Siegel
|
|
|
|
|
Vice
President, Finance
|
|
|
2,941,631 |
|
Loretta
M. Itri, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
President,
Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical
Officer
|
|
|
9,071,990 |
|
W.
Lloyd Sanders
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer
|
|
|
4,412,446 |
|
All
current executive officers as a group (4 persons)
|
|
|
42,900,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
other employees (15 persons)
|
|
|
17,320,322 |
|
New
Plan Benefits
No awards
have been granted based on the increase to the share reserve subject to this
proposal. However, each of Christopher P. Parios, Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D. and
Douglas G. Watson will be granted shares of common stock under the director
grant program as soon as practicable or shortly after the first business day
following the expiration of the lock-up period under terms of the Company’s
recently concluded financing transaction with a fair market value that shall not
exceed $100,000 on such grant date.
General
Provisions
Vesting
Acceleration. In the event we should
experience a change in control, then unless otherwise provided in the award
agreement, each outstanding award will automatically accelerate in full and the
plan administrator may terminate any outstanding awards. A change in control
will be deemed to occur for purposes of the Plan in the event (a) of stockholder
approval of a merger or consolidation, (b) of stockholder approval of a sale of
all or substantially all our assets, (c) there occurs any transaction or series
of related transactions pursuant to which any person or group of related persons
becomes directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of securities possessing
more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of our
outstanding securities without the consent of the Board, (d) there is a change
in the majority of our Board of Directors as a result of one or more contested
elections for Board membership or (e) the stockholders approve a plan of
complete liquidation.
The
acceleration of vesting in the event of a change in control may be seen as an
anti-takeover provision and may have the affect of discouraging a merger
proposal, a takeover attempt or other efforts to gain control of
us.
Changes in
Capitalization. In the event of
any increase or decrease in the number of shares of our common stock resulting
from any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or
reclassification of shares, or other increase or decrease effected without our
receipt of consideration proportionate adjustments will be made to: (i) the
maximum number of securities issuable under the Plan; (ii) the maximum number of
securities for which any one person may be granted awards under the Plan; (iii)
the maximum number of securities subject to an initial award under the director
grant program; and (iv) the maximum number of securities for which incentive
stock options may be granted; and (v) the price per share in effect for
outstanding awards. Such adjustments will be made in such manner as
the plan administrator deems appropriate.
Valuation. The
fair market value per share of our common stock on any relevant date under the
Plan will be deemed to be equal to the closing selling price per share on that
date on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. On April 26, 2010, the fair market
value per share of our common stock determined on such basis was
$x.xx.
Stockholder
Rights and Transferability. No optionee will have any
stockholder rights with respect to the option shares until such optionee has
exercised the option and paid the exercise price for the purchased shares. The
holder of a stock appreciation right will not have any stockholder rights with
respect to the shares subject to that right unless and until such person
exercises the right and becomes the holder of record of any shares of our common
stock distributed upon such exercise. Options are not assignable or transferable
other than by will or the laws of inheritance following optionee’s death, and
during the optionee’s lifetime, the option may only be exercised by the
optionee.
A
participant will have full stockholder rights with respect to any shares of
common stock issued to him or her under the Plan, whether or not his or her
interest in those shares is vested. A participant will not have any stockholder
rights with respect to the shares of common stock subject to a restricted stock
unit until that award vests and the shares of common stock are actually issued
thereunder. However, dividend-equivalent units may be paid or credited, either
in cash or in actual or phantom shares of common stock, on outstanding
restricted stock units, subject to such terms and conditions as the plan
administrator may deem appropriate.
Special Tax
Election. The plan administrator may provide one or more
holders of awards under the Plan with the right to have us withhold a portion of
the shares otherwise issuable to such individuals in satisfaction of the
withholding taxes to which they become subject in connection with the issuance,
exercise or settlement of those awards.
Amendment and
Termination. Our Board may
amend or modify the Plan at any time subject to stockholder approval to the
extent required under applicable law or regulation or pursuant to the listing
standards of the stock exchange on which our common stock is at the time
primarily traded. The Plan will terminate on July 8, 2019 subject to
any earlier termination by the Board.
Summary
of Federal Income Tax Consequences
The
following is a summary of the Federal income taxation treatment applicable to us
and the participants who receive awards under the Plan.
Option
Grants. Options granted under the Plan may be either incentive
stock options which satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code or non-statutory options which are not intended to meet such
requirements. The Federal income tax treatment for the two types of options
differs as follows:
Incentive
Options. No taxable income is recognized by the optionee at
the time of the option grant, and no taxable income is recognized for regular
tax purposes at the time the option is exercised, although taxable income may
arise at that time for alternative minimum tax purposes. The optionee will
recognize taxable income in the year in which the purchased shares are sold or
otherwise made the subject of certain other dispositions. For Federal tax
purposes, dispositions are divided into two categories: (i) qualifying, and (ii)
disqualifying. A qualifying disposition occurs if the sale or other disposition
is made more than two (2) years after the date the option for the shares
involved in such sale or disposition is granted and more than one (1) year after
the date the option is exercised for those shares. If the sale or disposition
occurs before these two periods are satisfied, then a disqualifying disposition
will result.
Upon a
qualifying disposition, the optionee will recognize long-term capital gain in an
amount equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized upon the sale or other
disposition of the purchased shares over (ii) the exercise price paid for the
shares. If there is a disqualifying disposition of the shares, then the excess
of (i) the fair market value of those shares on the exercise date or (if less)
the amount realized upon such sale or disposition over (ii) the
exercise price paid for the shares will be taxable as ordinary income to the
optionee. Any additional gain recognized upon the disposition will be
a capital gain.
If the
optionee makes a disqualifying disposition of the purchased shares, then we will
be entitled to an income tax deduction, for the taxable year in which such
disposition occurs, equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
optionee as a result of the disposition. We will not be entitled to any income
tax deduction if the optionee makes a qualifying disposition of the
shares.
Non-Statutory
Options. No taxable income is recognized by an optionee upon
the grant of a non-statutory option. The optionee will in general recognize
ordinary income, in the year in which the option is exercised, equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the purchased shares on the exercise date
over the exercise price paid for the shares, and the optionee will be required
to satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. We will
be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income
recognized by the optionee with respect to the exercised non-statutory option.
The deduction will in general be allowed for our taxable year in which such
ordinary income is recognized by the optionee.
Stock Appreciation
Rights. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a
stock appreciation right. The holder will recognize ordinary income
in the year in which the stock appreciation right is exercised, in an amount
equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common
stock on the exercise date over the base price in effect for the exercised
right, and the holder will be required to satisfy the tax withholding
requirements applicable to such income. We will be entitled to an income tax
deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder in
connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right. The deduction will
be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is
recognized.
Stock Awards. The
recipient of vested shares of common stock will recognize ordinary income at the
time those shares are issued. The recipient of unvested shares of common
stock issued under the Plan will not recognize any taxable income at
the time those shares are issued but will have to report as ordinary income, as
and when those shares subsequently vest, an amount equal to the excess of (i)
the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date over (ii) the cash
consideration (if any) paid for the shares. The recipient may, however, elect
under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to include as ordinary income
in the year the unvested shares are issued an amount equal to the excess of (i)
the fair market value of those shares on the issue date over (ii) the cash
consideration (if any) paid for such shares. If the Section 83(b) election is
made, the recipient will not recognize any additional income as and when the
shares subsequently vest. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal
to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient with respect to the
shares. The deduction will in general be allowed for our taxable year in which
such ordinary income is recognized by the recipient.
Restricted Stock
Units. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of
restricted stock units. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in
which the shares subject to the units are actually issued to the
holder. The amount of that income will be equal to the fair market
value of the shares on the date of issuance, and the holder will be required to
satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. We will be
entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income
recognized by the holder at the time the shares are issued. The deduction will
be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is
recognized.
Dividend Equivalent
Rights. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a
dividend equivalent right award. The holder will recognize ordinary
income in the year in which a dividend or distribution, whether in cash,
securities or other property, is paid to the holder. The amount of that income
will be equal to the fair market value of the cash, securities or other property
received, and the holder will be required to satisfy the tax withholding
requirements applicable to such income. We will be entitled to an income tax
deduction equal to the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the holder of
the dividend equivalent right award at the time the dividend or distribution is
paid to such holder. That deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in
which such ordinary income is recognized.
Deductibility of Executive
Compensation. We anticipate that any compensation deemed paid
by us in connection with the exercise of non-statutory options or stock
appreciation rights will qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes
of Section 162(m) and will not have to be taken into account for purposes of the
$1 million limitation per covered individual on the deductibility of the
compensation paid to certain of our executive officers. Accordingly, the
compensation deemed paid with respect to options and stock appreciation rights
granted under the Plan will remain deductible by us without limitation under
Section 162(m). However, any compensation deemed paid by us in
connection with shares issued under stock awards or restricted stock units will
be subject to the $1 million limitation.
Accounting
Treatment. Pursuant to the accounting standards established by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), we will be required to expense
all share-based payments, including grants of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and all other stock-based
awards under the Plan. Accordingly, stock options and stock appreciation rights
which are granted to our employees and non-employee Board members and payable in
shares of our common stock will have to be valued at fair value as of the grant
date under an appropriate valuation formula, and that value will then have to be
charged as a direct compensation expense against our reported earnings over the
designated vesting period of the award. For shares issuable upon the vesting of
restricted stock units awarded under the Plan, we will be required to amortize
over the vesting period a compensation cost equal to the fair market value of
the underlying shares on the date of the award. If any other shares are unvested
at the time of their direct issuance, then the fair market value of those shares
at that time will be charged to our reported earnings ratably over the vesting
period. Such accounting treatment for restricted stock units and direct stock
issuances will be applicable whether vesting is tied to service periods or
performance goals. The issuance of a fully-vested stock bonus will result in an
immediate charge to our earnings equal to the fair market value of the bonus
shares on the issuance date.
Required
Vote
The
affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding voting shares present or
represented and entitled to vote at the 2010 Annual Meeting is required for
approval of the amendment and restatement of the Plan. Should such approval not
be obtained, then the share reserve under the Plan will not be decreased or
otherwise adjusted. However, awards may be made under the Plan until the earlier
of the date of all the shares of common stock currently reserved for issuance
under the Plan have been issued or any earlier expiration of the
Plan.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The Board believes that this proposal
is in the company’s best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders
and recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment and restatement to our
2009 stock incentive plan.
PROPOSAL
FOUR
Ratification
Of The Appointment Of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The Board
has selected the firm of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010, subject
to ratification by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Amper Politziner
& Mattia, LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Representatives
of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting where they will be available to respond to questions and, if they
desire, to make a statement.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
The
Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the
appointment of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010.
OTHER
MATTERS
The Board
does not know of any other matter that may be brought before the Annual Meeting.
However, if any such other matters are properly brought before the Annual
Meeting, as permitted, the proxies may use their own judgment to determine how
to vote your shares.
MATTERS
RELATING TO OUR GOVERNANCE
The
Board and its Committees
The Board
currently consists of four directors. They are Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.,
Christopher P. Parios, Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D., and Douglas G. Watson. Dr.
Warrell is Chairman of the Board. The Board has determined that, except for Dr.
Warrell, all of the members of the Board are “independent directors”. Dr.
Warrell is not considered independent, as he also holds the position of Chief
Executive Officer of the Company.
The Board
has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee. The Board held eighteen meetings during the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Audit Committee held four meetings and the Compensation
Committee held two meetings. No formal meetings were held by the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, as the independent directors of the Board acted
as a whole on nominating and corporate governance matters. Independent directors
of the Board held three executive sessions at which only independent directors
were present. Each member of the Board attended no fewer than 94% of the total
number of meetings of the Board and the committees of which he was a member.
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the
Board at our annual meeting of stockholders, we encourage directors to attend
and historically more than a majority have done so.
Board of Directors Leadership Structure and Role in
Risk Oversight
Our Board
evaluates its leadership structure and role in risk oversight on an ongoing
basis. Our leadership structure combines the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer roles into one position. Currently, Dr. Warrell
serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of our
company. Since 2005, our Board has also designated a Lead Director
who acts as the leader of the independent Directors of the Board and as
chairperson of the executive sessions of our independent Directors, serves as a
non-exclusive intermediary between the independent Directors and management,
including our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, provides input
to the Chairman in planning agendas for Board meetings and facilitates
discussions among the independent Directors as appropriate between Board
meetings. Currently, Mr. Watson serves as our Lead Director. Our
Board determines what leadership structure it deems appropriate based on factors
such as the experience of the applicable individuals, the current business
environment of the Company, the current stage of development and
commercialization of our products and product candidates and other relevant
factors. After considering these factors, our Board has determined that the
combined roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, along with
a Lead Director, is an appropriate board leadership structure for our company at
this time.
The Board
is also responsible for oversight of our risk management practices, while
management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. This
division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the
risks facing the Company, and the Company’s board leadership structure supports
this approach. Through our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
and other members of management, the Board receives periodic reports regarding
the risks facing the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee assists the Board
in its oversight role by receiving periodic reports regarding our risk and
control environment. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee and
Audit Committee work together to review any potential short-term or long-term
risks as a result of the current decisions of the Company's
management.
Audit
Committee
The Audit
Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Audit Committee
currently consists of Christopher P. Parios, Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D. and
Douglas G. Watson. Mr. Watson serves as Chairman of this Committee. Each member
of the Audit Committee is independent. The Board has also determined that Mr.
Watson fulfills the SEC criteria as an audit committee financial expert.
Pursuant to the Audit Committee’s charter adopted by the Board, the purposes of
the Audit Committee include reviewing the procedures and results of our external
auditing functions, providing a direct communication link to the Board from our
external auditing staff and our Chief Financial Officer or his equivalent and
helping assure the quality of our financial reporting and control systems. The
Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate the independent
registered public accounting firm that examines our financial statements. A copy
of this committee’s charter is available on our website at
www.genta.com.
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee currently consists of Christopher P. Parios, Daniel D.
Von Hoff, M.D. and Douglas G. Watson. Mr. Watson serves as Chairman of this
Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent. The primary
purpose of the Compensation Committee is to review, on an annual basis or more
frequently as it deems appropriate, the performance of our executive officers,
review the amount and form of compensation payable to our executive officers and
report to the Board on an annual basis, making recommendations regarding
compensation of our executive officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee
administers our equity compensation plans. A copy of this committee’s charter is
available on our website at www.genta.com. The Compensation Committee, along
with the Audit Committee of the Board, reviews any potential short-term or
long-term risks as a result of its compensation practices. The
Committees believe that these risks are not reasonably likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Company. Nonetheless, the Compensation
Committee, working with the Audit Committee, seeks to mitigate these risks to
the extent possible.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
No formal
meetings were held by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as the
independent directors of the Board acted as a whole on nominating and corporate
governance matters. The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are to identify and recommend individuals qualified for nomination to
serve on our Board and its committees, ensure that the performance of the Board
is reviewed, develop and recommend corporate governance principles to the Board
and ensure that an appropriate governing structure with respect to the Board and
its committees is in place so that the Board can perform a proper review
function. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter
is available on our website at www.genta.com.
In
assessing candidates as Director nominees, whether recommended by this committee
or stockholders, the committee considers the following criteria:
|
·
|
Members
of the Board should be individuals of high integrity and independence,
substantial accomplishments, and prior or current association with
institutions noted for their
excellence.
|
|
·
|
Members
of the Board should have demonstrated leadership ability, with broad
experience, diverse perspectives, and the ability to exercise sound
business judgment.
|
|
·
|
The
background and experience of members of the Board should be in areas
important to the operation of the Company such as business, education,
finance, government, law, medicine or
science.
|
|
·
|
The
composition of the Board should reflect sensitivity to the need for
diversity as to gender, ethnic background and
experience.
|
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended
by stockholders. In order for a stockholder to make a nomination, the
stockholder must comply with the advance notice provision of Section 14 in
Article II of our by-laws. The stockholder must provide a written notice along
with the additional information required by our by-laws to our Corporate
Secretary at our address listed on the top of page one of this Proxy Statement.
For notice to be timely, it shall be delivered not later than the close of
business on the 90th
calendar day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th
calendar day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual
Meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the Annual
Meeting is more than 30 calendar days before or more than 60 calendar days after
such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be delivered
not earlier than the close of business on the 120th
calendar day prior to such Annual Meeting and not later than the close of
business on the later of the 90th
calendar day prior to such Annual Meeting or the 10th
calendar day following the calendar day on which public announcement of the date
of such meeting is first made by the Company.
Compensation
of Directors
Our
non-employee Directors earn $15,000 per year for their services. Non-employee
Directors earn an additional $1,500 for each Board meeting and $1,000 for each
committee meeting attended in person and $750 for each Board or committee
meeting attended telephonically. The Lead Director and each non-employee
Chairperson of each committee of the Board earn annual cash compensation of
$5,000. Non-employee Directors receive $2,500 per day for Board or committee
activities outside of normal activities. Due to the Company’s inability to raise
capital and in order to conserve cash, none of the amounts earned by each
Director was paid during 2009.
Currently,
under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, on the date of each annual stockholders
meeting, beginning with the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each individual
who is at that time serving as, and is to continue to serve as, a non-employee
Board member will automatically be granted an award in the form of fully vested
shares of common stock and/or options with a value not to exceed $100,000.00.
Our Compensation Committee will have the sole discretion to determine the amount
and type of award for each year. The applicable annual amount will be determined
by the Compensation Committee on or before the date of the grant, but in no
event will such amount exceed $100,000.00.
Each
individual who is first elected or appointed as a non-employee Board member at
any time after the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall automatically be
granted on the date of such election or appointment, an award in the form of
fully vested shares of common stock and/or options with a value equal to the
applicable annual amount. Our Compensation Committee will have the
sole discretion to determine the amount and type of award for each year. The
applicable annual amount will be determined by the Compensation Committee on or
before the date of the grant, but in no event will such amount exceed
$100,000.00.
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation earned by
the following non-employee Directors of the Company during the year ended
December 31, 2009:
Name
|
|
Fees earned
or paid in
cash ($) (1)
|
|
|
Stock
awards
($) (2)
|
|
|
Option
awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Martin
J. Driscoll (3)
|
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
Christopher
P. Parios
|
|
$ |
39,750 |
|
|
$ |
274,785 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
314,535 |
|
Daniel
D. Von Hoff, M.D.
|
|
$ |
29,250 |
|
|
$ |
274,785 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
304,035 |
|
Douglas
G. Watson
|
|
$ |
45,500 |
|
|
$ |
274,785 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
320,285 |
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount earned by the non-employee Director during 2009. Due to
the Company’s inability to raise capital and in order to conserve cash, no
fees were paid to any Director during
2009.
|
|
(2)
|
These
amounts reflect grants of restricted stock units. The dollar amounts for
the awards represent the grant-date fair value-based amounts of the
restricted stock units.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Driscoll resigned from the Board effective August 26,
2009.
|
Stockholder
Communications to the Board
The Board
has provided a process for stockholders to communicate with our Directors.
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with our
Directors may address their correspondence to the Board, to the non-employee
Directors or any other group of Directors or committee of the Board or to a
particular Director, in care of our Corporate Secretary at our address listed on
the top of page one of this Proxy Statement.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board
has determined that, except for Dr. Warrell, all of the members of the Board are
“independent directors”. Dr. Warrell is not considered independent, as he is an
executive officer of the Company.
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
We have
set forth certain policies and procedures with respect to the review and
approval of related-party transactions. Specifically, pursuant to our Audit
Committee Charter, the Audit Committee is required to review and approve any
related-party transactions. In connection with such review and approval, the
Audit Committee may retain special legal, accounting or other advisors and may
request any of our officers or employees or our outside counsel or independent
auditors to meet with any members of, or advisors to, the Audit Committee as
well as perform any other activities consistent with the Audit Committee
Charter, our by-laws, and governing law, as the Audit Committee or the Board
deems necessary or appropriate.
Code
of Ethics
The Board
has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all our Directors and employees,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. A
copy of the Code is currently available on our website at
www.genta.com.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION
Executive
Officers
Our
executive officers are:
Raymond P.
Warrell, Jr.,
M.D., 60, has
been our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since December 1999
and our Chairman since January 2001. From December 1999 to May 2003, he was also
our President. From 1978 to 1999, Dr. Warrell was associated with the Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, where he held tenured positions as
Member, Attending Physician, and Associate Physician-in-Chief, and with the Joan
and Sanford Weill Medical College of Cornell University, where he was Professor
of Medicine. Dr. Warrell also has more than 20 years of development and
consulting experience in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology products. He was a
co-founder and chairman of the scientific advisory board of PolaRx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., which developed Trisenox®, a drug for the treatment of
acute promyelocytic leukemia, which is now marketed by Cephalon, Inc. Dr.
Warrell holds or has filed numerous patents and patent applications for
biomedical therapeutic or diagnostic agents. He has published more than 100
peer-reviewed papers and more than 240 book chapters and abstracts, most of
which are focused upon drug development in tumor-related diseases. Dr. Warrell
is a member of the American Society of Clinical Investigation, the American
Society of Hematology, the American Association for Cancer Research and the
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Among many awards, he has received the
U.S. Public Health Service Award for Exceptional Achievement in Orphan Drug
Development from the FDA. He obtained a B.S. in Chemistry from Emory University,
a M.D. from the Medical College of Georgia, and a M.B.A. from Columbia
University Graduate School of Business. Dr. Warrell is married to Dr. Loretta M.
Itri, President, Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer of
Genta.
Gary
Siegel, 52, joined Genta in May 2003 as Director, Financial Services, was
appointed Senior Director, Financial Services in April 2004 and was appointed
Vice President, Finance in September 2007. During his tenure at Genta, Mr.
Siegel has been accountable for the day-to-day accounting and financial
operations of the Company including public and management reporting, treasury
operations, planning, financial controls and compliance. Mr. Siegel became an
executive officer of the Company and assumed the role of interim Principal
Accounting Officer, interim Principal Financial Officer and interim Corporate
Secretary, effective February 29, 2008. Prior to joining Genta, he worked for
two years at Geller & Company, a private consulting firm, where he led the
management reporting for a multi-billion dollar client. His twenty-four years of
experience in the pharmaceutical industry include leadership roles at
Warner-Lambert Company and Pfizer Inc., where he held positions of progressively
increasing levels of responsibility including Director, Corporate Finance and
Director, Financial Planning & Reporting.
Loretta M. Itri,
M.D., F.A.C.P., 60, has been our President, Pharmaceutical Development
and Chief Medical Officer since May 2003, prior to which she was Executive Vice
President, Pharmaceutical Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer.
Dr. Itri joined Genta in March 2001. Previously, Dr. Itri was Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Clinical Affairs, and Chief Medical Officer at Ortho
Biotech Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company. As the senior clinical leader at
Ortho Biotech and previously at J&J’s R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research
Institute (PRI), she led the clinical teams responsible for NDA approvals for
Procrit® (epoetin alpha), that company’s largest single product. She had similar
leadership responsibilities for the approvals of Leustatin®, Renova®, Topamax®,
Levaquin®, and Ultram®. Prior to joining J&J, Dr. Itri was associated with
Hoffmann-La Roche, most recently as Assistant Vice President and Senior Director
of Clinical Investigations, where she was responsible for all phases of clinical
development programs in immunology, infectious diseases, antivirals, AIDS,
hematology and oncology. Under her leadership in the areas of recombinant
proteins, cytotoxic drugs and differentiation agents, the first successful
Product License Application (PLA) for any interferon product (Roferon-A®;
interferon alfa) was compiled. Dr. Itri is married to Dr. Warrell, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman.
W. Lloyd
Sanders, 49, assumed the position of Senior Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer in March 2008. He had been our Senior Vice President,
Commercial Operations since October 2006. Mr. Sanders joined Genta in January
2006 as Vice President, Sales and Marketing. He has twenty years of experience
in the pharmaceutical industry. Prior to joining Genta, Mr. Sanders was
associated with Sanofi-Synthelabo, and subsequently Sanofi-Aventis. From October
2004 through January 2006 he was Vice-President, Oncology Sales for the combined
companies. In that role, he had key product sales responsibility for Eloxatin®
(oxaliplatin), Taxotere® (docetaxel), Anzemet® (dolasetron mesylate), and
ELITEK® (rasburicase). He led the successful restructuring, integration,
deployment, strategic development, and tactical execution of the merged
companies’ sales forces. He was responsible for national account group
purchasing organizations contracting strategy and negotiations, and he shared
responsibility for oncology sales training and sales operations. From October
2002 through October 2004, Mr. Sanders was Area Vice President, Oncology Sales.
He led the 110-member team that achieved record sales for an oncology product
launch with Eloxatin®. From 1987 until 2002, he held positions of progressively
increasing levels of responsibility at Pharmacia, Inc. (now Pfizer), most
recently as Oncology Sales Director, West/East. Mr. Sanders holds a Bachelor of
Business Administration from Memphis State University.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
of Compensation Program
The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has
responsibility for overseeing our compensation and benefit policies, evaluating
senior executive performance, and determining compensation for our senior
executives, including our executive officers. The Committee ensures that the
total compensation paid to executive officers is fair, reasonable and
competitive.
The
individuals who serve as our Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as well as the other individuals
included in the Summary Compensation Table below, are referred to as the
‘‘executive officers’’.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our
compensation philosophy is based on our belief that our compensation programs
should: be aligned with stockholders’ interests and business objectives; reward
performance; and be externally competitive and internally equitable. We seek to
achieve three objectives, which serve as guidelines in making compensation
decisions:
•
Providing a total compensation package which is competitive and therefore,
enables us to attract and retain, high-caliber executive personnel;
•
Integrating compensation programs with our short-term and long-term strategic
plan and business objectives; and
•
Encouraging achievement of business objectives and enhancement of stockholder
value by providing executive management long-term incentive through equity
ownership.
Role of
Executive Officers in the Compensation Decisions
The
Committee makes all compensation decisions regarding the compensation of our
executive officers. The CEO reviews the performance of our executive officers
and except for the President, Pharmaceutical Development & Chief Medical
Officer (who is the spouse of the CEO), the CEO makes recommendations to the
Committee based on these reviews, including salary adjustments, variable cash
awards and equity awards. The Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying
any recommended adjustments or awards to executives. With respect to the
President, Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer, the Committee
in its sole discretion determines the amount of any adjustments or
awards.
Establishing
Executive Compensation
Compensation
levels for our executive officers are determined through comparisons with other
companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including
companies with which we compete for personnel. To determine external
competitiveness practices relevant to the executive officers, we review data
from two industry surveys of executive compensation: Radford Biotechnology
Compensation Survey and Organization Resources Counselors (collectively,
“External Market Data”). Due to macroeconomic factors in the global economy
during 2008 and 2009, the Committee did not feel that changes in executive
compensation required repurchase of these data to establish an updated database
for decision-making.
In 2007,
the Committee retained Towers Perrin, a leading compensation consultant with
expertise in biopharmaceutical industry compensation practices, to assist in its
analysis of executive compensation. Towers Perrin provided a third-party
perspective based on extensive knowledge of the industry and advised the
Committee of developments in the design of compensation programs and provided
benchmarks against which to compare our total compensation packages. Towers
Perrin conducted a peer group analysis in order to weigh the competitiveness of
the Company’s overall compensation arrangements. The peer companies were: Allos
Therapeutics, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Avalon Pharmaceuticals, Cell Genesys, Cell
Therapeutics, Favrille, Hana Biosciences, Introgen Therapeutics, NeoPharm,
Pharmacyclics, Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Telik and Vion
Pharmaceuticals. These companies were selected for the peer group because, like
Genta, they were oncology focused, public pharmaceutical companies with products
in mid to late-stage development.
In 2008,
the Committee retained Aon Radford Consulting (a nationally recognized
compensation consulting firm with specific expertise in dealing with the equity
issues of biopharmaceutical companies) to conduct a review of market trends
related to equity compensation in consideration of the fact that the Company’s
1998 Plan would be expiring in May 2008. The peer group companies
used for that analysis were: Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AMDL, Inc., Celsion
Corp., Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Opexa
Therapeutics, Inc., Oscient Pharmaceuticals Corp., Poniard Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., SEQUENOM, Inc. and Targeted Genetics Corp. These companies were selected
because, like Genta, they were oncology focused, public pharmaceutical companies
with products in mid to late-stage development.
In
establishing compensation levels, it is the Committee’s objective to target
total annual compensation of each executive officer at a level between the 50th
and 75th percentiles for comparable positions. However, in determining the
compensation for each executive officer, the Committee also considers a number
of other factors including: an evaluation of the responsibilities required for
each respective position, individual experience levels and individual
performance and contributions toward achievement of our business objectives.
There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either
cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Instead,
the Committee determines the mix of compensation for each executive officer
based on its review of the competitive data and its analysis of that
individual’s performance and contribution to our performance. In addition, in
light of our stage of development, considerable emphasis is placed on
equity-based compensation in an effort to preserve cash to finance our research
and development efforts.
Other
Factors Influencing 2009 Compensation for Executive Officers
Our
potential products are in various stages of research and development and limited
revenues have as yet been generated from product sales. As a result, the
Committee does not believe the use of traditional performance standards, such as
corporate profitability, is appropriate in the evaluation of our performance or
the performance of our individual executives. The compensation of our executive
officers is based, in substantial part, on industry compensation practices,
trends noted (in the External Market Data, peer group analysis and by consulting
services provided in prior fiscal years), as well as the extent to which the
business and individual executive officers’ objectives are achieved. Such
objectives are established by the Committee and modified as necessary to reflect
changes in market conditions and other factors. Individual performance is
measured against quantifiable objectives.
Among the
significant business objectives achieved during 2009 were the following:
initiation of the first Genta-sponsored clinical trial of tesetaxel; completion
of enrollment into AGENDA, the Company’s Phase 3 trial of Genasense® in patients
with advanced melanoma; the sale of convertible notes, common stock and warrants
in three offerings that raised aggregate gross proceeds of $19 million; and
release of initial data from AGENDA. While the initial results from
AGENDA were insufficiently positive to support refiling of regulatory
applications for marketing approval, the key endpoints of overall survival and
durable response were too early to evaluate. The Company was therefore required
to rapidly adjust by reducing operations, controlling cash expenditures,
reducing workforce, and determining additional financing options if operations
were to continue. These milestones and performance requirements were
considered carefully in evaluating executive performance and making
determinations regarding executive compensation.
Three
significant factors warranted very substantial weight in evaluating our business
performance and in making executive compensation decisions. These factors were:
1) the initial results of AGENDA that effectively deferred any potential
commercial launch of Genasense® by at least one additional year; 2) our receipt
of a complete response letter from the FDA regarding the Company's amended New
Drug Application (NDA) for the use of Genasense® plus chemotherapy in patients
with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) determining that the FDA would not
approve the NDA without an additional clinical trial; and 3) our inability to
close a licensing or partnership deal for Genasense®, tesetaxel, Ganite® or oral
gallium compound before the close of the fiscal year.
The
Committee reviewed peer analysis data, the compensation history of each
executive officer, including their annual salary, cash incentive bonus and stock
option awards. Due to the Company’s failure to meet critical business and
financial objectives (described above), Dr. Warrell recommended that, for the
third consecutive year, there not be any annual salary increases and that no
incentive bonuses be paid to any employee, including executive officers. The
Committee approved this recommendation. Dr. Warrell’s salary that was otherwise
payable pursuant to his employment agreement had been decreased by 15% with his
consent by the Committee effective January 1, 2008. The Committee also
considered Drs. Warrell and Itri’s voluntary deferral of the cash portion of
their salaries for the period from April 19, 2008 through August 17, 2008 in
order to conserve cash. In order to conserve cash, Drs. Warrell and
Itri again elected to defer the cash portion of their salaries from January 5,
2009 through July 3, 2009. The deferred amounts, totaling approximately $815,000
have been accrued as a liability and have not been paid. The
equity-based long-term incentive compensation and total compensation level
(annual salary, incentive bonus and equity based compensation) for each of the
executive officers was below the median (50th percentile) for those of
comparable companies.
Elements
of Executive Compensation
Our
compensation package for executive officers generally consists of annual cash
compensation, which includes both fixed (annual salary) and variable (cash
incentive bonus program) elements; long-term compensation in the form of stock
options and other perquisites. The main components are annual salary, cash
incentive bonus and stock options, all of which are common elements of executive
compensation pay in general and throughout the biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industry.
Annual
Salary
We pay an
annual salary to our employees and the executive officers as consideration for
fulfillment of certain roles and responsibilities. Changes in annual salaries
for executive officers, if any, are generally effective at the beginning of each
year. As noted above, there were no annual salary increases for
2008, 2009 or 2010.
Increases
to annual salary reflect a reward and recognition for successfully fulfilling
the position’s role and responsibilities, the incremental value of the
experience, knowledge, expertise and skills the individual acquires and develops
during employment with us and adjustments as appropriate based on external
competitiveness and internal equity. In consideration of our cost-reduction and
cash conservation measures, there were no annual salary increases for 2008, 2009
or 2010. Dr. Warrell’s base salary was decreased by the Committee by
15% effective January 1, 2008. In addition, in order to further conserve our
cash resources, Drs. Warrell and Itri deferred the cash portions of their
salaries from April 19, 2008 through August 17, 2008, and again agreed to defer
a portion of their salaries effective January 5, 2009 through July 3,
2009. The deferred amounts, totaling approximately $815,000 have been
accrued as a liability and have not been paid.
Cash
Incentive Bonus Program
The
target cash incentive bonus program award for the CEO (forty percent of annual
salary) and the President, Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer
(thirty percent of annual salary) is based on the terms of their employment
agreements. The Committee determines the annual target for the other executive
officers each year based on external competitiveness and internal equity. Based
on the External Market Data, the target amounts for executive officers who were
Senior Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents were established at thirty percent
and twenty-five percent of annual salary, respectively. As noted above, there
were no cash bonuses paid to any of the executive officers for either 2008 or
2009.
Typically,
we award cash incentive bonuses to employees, including the executive officers,
as a reward and recognition for contributing to our achievement of specific
annual business objectives established by the Committee at the beginning of the
year. All employees are eligible for a form of cash incentive bonus, although
payment of a cash incentive bonus is made at an individual level each year
contingent upon overall performance of the Company. However, as described above,
the business performance of the Company was insufficient in 2009 to warrant the
payment of cash incentive bonuses to our employees, including executive
officers.
Equity-Based
Compensation
We grant
equity-based compensation to employees, including executive officers, to
attract, motivate, engage and retain highly qualified and highly sought-after
employees. We grant equity awards on a broad basis to encourage all employees to
work with a long-term view. Stock options are inherently performance-based
because they deliver value to the option holder only if the value of our stock
increases. Thus, stock options are a potential reward for long-term value
creation and serve as an incentive for employees who remain with us to
contribute to the overall long-term success of the business. We also award
restricted stock units (“RSUs”) because we believe RSUs are an appropriate
vehicle to align the employee’s interests with those of our stockholders.
Because equity compensation is a significant component of our compensation
package, the Committee adopted our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the
Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and 1998 Non-Employee-Directors Stock Option
Plan.
Equity
Award Exchange Offers
On July
9, 2009, our Board approved an Equity Award Exchange Offer Program to
non-employee Directors whereby each non-employee Director was given the
opportunity to exchange their outstanding stock options to purchase shares of
Genta common stock for new replacement restricted stock units ("New RSUs")
provided the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) had been approved by our
stockholders, and this Plan was approved by our stockholders. Our
outstanding options have exercise prices that are significantly higher than the
current market price of our common stock. For this reason, the Board
believed that these options had little or no current value as an incentive to
retain and motivate non-employee Directors, and unlikely to be exercised in the
foreseeable future. By making the offer to exchange outstanding options for New
RSUs, our Board intended to provide our non-employee Directors with the benefit
of receiving equity awards that over time may have a greater potential to
increase in value, and thereby create better incentives for our non-employee
Directors to remain with us and contribute to the attainment of our business and
financial objectives and the creation of value for all of our
stockholders.
On August
26, 2009 the Committee approved an Equity Award Exchange Offer Program for all
U.S. employees whereby each employee was given an opportunity to exchange
his/her outstanding stock options that had been granted under the Company’s 1988
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, to purchase shares of our common stock for new
replacement RSUs. All eligible employees submitted their eligible stock options
for cancellation, and accordingly, each employee was granted a RSU award on
August 31, 2009.
Determining
The Timing And Exercise Price Of Equity-Based Compensation
There is
no established practice of timing equity grants in advance of the release of
favorable or unfavorable financial or business results. Grants of stock options
or RSUs to Section 16 officers are made only at duly convened meetings of the
Committee. Performance awards for existing executive officers and employees are
typically made in connection with the annual review process which occurs in
January each year. Stock options or RSUs relating to these
performance awards are then usually granted in the January meeting of the
Committee. Equity awards for newly hired executives are typically made at the
next scheduled Committee meeting following the executive’s hire date. It is our
intent that all stock option grants have an exercise price per share equal to
the closing selling price per share on the grant date. In 2009, the Company’s
1998 Stock Incentive Plan had expired, and a new Stock Incentive Plan was not
approved by our stockholders until the middle of 2009. Thus, the RSU grants and
Equity Award Exchange Offer Program was not approved by the Committee until the
first Committee meeting following stockholder approval of the
Plan.
Retirement
Benefits
All
employees are eligible to participate in the Genta Incorporated Savings &
Retirement Plan (Savings Plan), a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, which
allows employee contributions to the Savings Plan on a before-tax basis in an
amount up to the lesser of 50% of the employee’s annual salary or a limit
prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. All contributions to the Savings
Plan are fully vested upon contribution. We provide retirement benefits to our
employees because we believe retirement benefits are an integral part of
employee benefit programs within the biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industry.
Perquisites
None of
our executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer and President,
Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer have perquisites in excess
of $10,000 in annual value. Our Chief Executive Officer and President,
Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer have employment agreements
that provide for the perquisites discussed under the heading “Employment
Agreements”.
Severance
Benefits
We have
adopted a severance pay program for nearly all of our employees, including
executive officers, except for Drs. Itri and Warrell, who are eligible for
severance benefits under the terms of their employment agreements as described
under the heading “Employment Agreements”. The severance pay program is intended
to preserve employee morale and productivity and encourage retention in the face
of the disruptive impact of an actual or rumored workforce reduction or a change
in control of our company. In addition, for executives, the program is intended
to align executive and stockholder interests by enabling executives to consider
corporate transactions that are in the best interests of the stockholders and
other of our constituents without undue concern over whether the transactions
may jeopardize the executive’s own employment.
These
arrangements, like other elements of executive compensation, are structured with
regard to practices at comparable companies for similarly-situated officers and
in a manner we believe is likely to attract and retain high quality executive
talent.
Although
there are differences in the benefit levels depending on the employee’s job
level, the basic elements are comparable for all employees, except for Drs. Itri
and Warrell as noted above, and for Messrs. Sanders and Siegel, as noted
below:
→ Double
trigger. Unlike ‘‘single trigger’’ plans that pay out immediately upon a change
in control, Genta’s severance pay program requires a ‘‘double trigger’’ – a
change in control followed by an involuntary loss of employment within one year
thereafter. This is consistent with the purpose of the program, which is to
provide employees with financial protection upon loss of
employment.
→ Covered
terminations. Employees may be eligible for payments, if there is either a
workforce reduction or if within one year of a change in control, their
employment is terminated without cause by the Company.
→
Severance payment. Subject to signing a release, eligible terminated employees
may receive severance.
→ Benefit
continuation. Subject to signing a release, basic health and dental insurance
may be continued following termination of employment.
→
Accelerated vesting of equity awards. Upon a change in control, any unvested
equity awards become vested.
Certain
Severance Arrangements
In the
event of their termination as a result of a reduction in force or change in
control, Mr. Sanders and Mr. Siegel are eligible for up to 24 weeks of severance
equal to $131,538 and $96,923, respectively, paid in portions on a bi-weekly
basis and not as a lump sum. Mr. Sanders and Mr. Siegel are also eligible to
continue their health/dental benefits at the Company’s expense for up to four
months, with an estimated value of $7,116 each. Drs. Itri’s and Warrell’s
eligibility for severance payments are described under the heading “Employment
Agreements”.
Deductibility
of Executive Compensation
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows a tax deduction to publicly held
companies for compensation paid to certain of their executive officers, to the
extent that compensation exceeds $1.0 million per covered officer in any year.
The limitation applies only to compensation that is not considered to be
performance-based. The RSUs awarded as a component of equity compensation do not
qualify as performance-based compensation. However, we believe that in
establishing the cash and equity incentive compensation programs for our
executive officers, the potential deductibility of the compensation payable
under those programs should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken
into consideration, and not the sole governing factor. For that reason, we may
deem it appropriate to provide one or more executive officers with the
opportunity to earn incentive compensation, whether through cash bonus programs
tied to our financial performance or through RSUs tied to the executive
officer’s continued service, which may, together with base salary, exceed in the
aggregate the amount deductible by reason of Section 162(m) or other provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code. We believe it is important to maintain cash and
equity incentive compensation at the levels needed to attract and retain the
executive officers essential to our success, even if all or part of that
compensation may not be deductible by reason of the Section 162(m)
limitation.
2009
Objectives and Executive Compensation Guidelines
Our
business objectives for 2009 included: completing enrollment of the phase 3
AGENDA trial of Genasense® in patients with advanced melanoma; public release of
information regarding analysis of progression-free survival and overall response
from AGENDA; initiating and completing enrollment of a dose-ranging
study of tesetaxel; and ongoing financing and business development activities
that will further the development and commercialization of our products. All of
these business objectives were achieved during 2009.
2010
Objectives and Executive Compensation and Bonus Guidelines
At
present, the 2010 compensation guidelines are comparable to the 2009 guidelines
with respect to the following: components of compensation; anticipated salary
adjustments; cash incentive bonus targets and equity-based compensation. The
Committee will make adjustments if necessary based on their assessment of a
variety of factors including: industry trends; competitive market data; business
objectives and corporate performance.
As part
of their compensation package, the Company’s named executive officers have the
opportunity to earn annual cash incentive awards. The Company’s named executive
officers include all of its executive officers and are referred to herein as the
executive officers. Cash incentive awards are designed to reward superior
executive performance while reinforcing the Company’s short-term strategic
operating goals. If warranted in special circumstances, individual one-time
discretionary bonuses may also be awarded to the Company’s executive officers
during the course of the year.
Each
year, in considering annual bonuses, the Committee evaluates the annual
performance of the individual executives, focusing on the executive’s
performance in his or her area or areas of functional responsibility relative to
the achievement of the Company’s annual corporate goals and other significant
corporate accomplishments. Beginning with fiscal year 2004, and
subject to adequacy of the Company’s resources, cash incentive awards have been
based on achievement of pre-established Company objectives and individual goals
established by the Committee in consultation with the CEO for each executive
officer and, for executive officers other than the CEO, a subjective review of
that individual’s performance relative to the overall priorities and strategies
of the Company. The Company’s strategic plan and individual performance targets
include successful partnering transactions, and other strategic plan metrics,
operational and financial metrics, regulatory compliance metrics, and timely
delivery of specific programs, plans, and budgetary objectives identified by the
Committee.
In 2010,
the Company’s strategic plan will focus on:
• Closing
one or more licensing agreements for tesetaxel;
•
Execution of all clinical research, regulatory and compliance activities related
to follow-up and completion of the Company’s Phase 3 trial of Genasense® (known
as AGENDA) in patients with advanced melanoma;
•
Conserving the Company’s existing cash position;
•
Successful execution of financing plans to strengthen the Company’s capital
position; and
•
Advancing the Company’s clinical and non-clinical pipeline of product
candidates.
In 2010,
Dr. Warrell’s individual performance goals will focus on his areas of
responsibility in his capacity as Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company,
as well as the senior manager for oversight of the departments of Legal Affairs,
Corporate Communications, Research and Development, Business Development, and
Quality Assurance (co-managing the latter with Dr. Itri). These activities will
principally center upon his ability to secure adequate financing of the Company,
the closing of one or more licensing transactions that will provide non-dilutive
capital to the Company, advancing the Company’s pipeline of therapeutic product
candidates, and maintaining stockholder confidence in management and the
Company. Dr. Warrell’s specific performance goals and the relative
weight of each goal include:
• Closing
one or more licensing agreements for tesetaxel (weighted at 20% of the potential
bonus award);
•
Conserving the Company’s existing cash position (weighted at 40% of the
potential bonus award);
•
Executing financing plans to strengthen the Company’s capital position (weighted
at 10% of the potential bonus award);
•
Implementing and managing the Company’s short- and long-term strategic plans
(weighted at 10% of the potential bonus award);
•
Managing legal affairs of the Company to streamline processes and conserve
resources (weighted at 5% of the potential bonus award);
•
Maintaining the effectiveness of patent and proprietary protections over the
Company’s pipeline of product candidates (weighted at 5% of the potential bonus
award); and
• Maintaining stockholder
confidence in the Company by managing investor and public relations (weighted at
10% of the potential bonus award).
In 2010,
Mr. Siegel’s individual performance goals will focus on his role as
Vice-President, Finance. Mr. Siegel is also expected to play a key
role in Strategic Planning, development and validation of financial forecasts
for Business Development, and compliance with financial laws and
regulations. Mr. Siegel’s specific performance goals and the relative
weight of each goal include:
• Timely
reporting of all financial, tax, and regulatory compliance documents (weighted
at 50% of the potential bonus award);
•
Effectively interacting with the Company’s auditors (weighted at 10% of the
potential bonus award);
• Timely
and effective interaction and responsiveness to the Audit Committee of the Board
(weighted at 5% of the potential bonus award);
•
Managing the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable, and payroll
(weighted at 15% of the potential bonus award); and
•
Effectively managing and interacting with the Company’s legal advisors on
matters related to the SEC and other regulatory and legal authorities (weighted
at 20% of the potential bonus award).
In 2010,
Dr. Itri’s individual performance goals will focus on her role as President,
Pharmaceutical Development, and Chief Medical Officer. These
activities broadly address the development, initiation, and execution of
clinical development plans for the Company’s therapeutic product
candidates. Dr. Itri is also the senior manager for the departments
of Regulatory Affairs, Project Management, Clinical Operations, Biostatistics,
and Quality Assurance (co-managing the latter with Dr. Warrell). Dr.
Itri’s specific performance goals and the relative weight of each goal
include:
•
Designing, implementing and managing the Company’s clinical research and
development activities (weighted at 20% of the potential bonus
award);
•
Executing all clinical research, regulatory and compliance activities related to
follow-up and completion of the Company’s Phase 3 trial of Genasense® (known as
AGENDA) in patients with advanced melanoma (weighted at 30% of the potential
bonus award);
•
Organizing the biostatistical analysis of the AGENDA trial on schedules that
comply with the Company’s strategic plans, consistent with a high level of
quality and regulatory compliance (weighted at 5% of the potential bonus
award);
•
Initiating a new clinical trial of tesetaxel administered on a weekly schedule
(weighted at 5% of the potential bonus award);
•
Initiating a new clinical trial of tesetaxel for patients with advanced melanoma
(weighted at 10% of the potential bonus award);
•
Initiating a confirmatory clinical trial of tesetaxel in patients with advanced
gastric cancer (weighted at 15% of the potential bonus award);
•
Initiating a new clinical trial of tesetaxel in patients with advanced prostate
cancer or advanced breast cancer (weighted at 10% of the potential bonus award);
and
•
Interacting effectively with FDA and EMEA on regulatory affairs related to the
Company’s product candidates (weighted at 5% of the potential bonus
award).
In 2010,
Mr. Sanders’s individual performance goals will focus on his roles as Chief
Operating Officer, as well as the senior manager with oversight responsibilities
for the departments of Sales and Marketing, Information Systems, Manufacturing,
and Human Resources. Mr. Sanders is also expected to play a key role
in Business Development activities. Mr. Sanders’s specific
performance goals and the relative weight of each goal include:
• Closing
one or more licensing agreements for tesetaxel (weighted at 25% of the potential
bonus award);
•
Initiating and completing maintenance and upgrades to the Company’s information
technology hardware and software platforms (weighted at 15% of the potential
bonus award);
•
Implementing a new corporate website (weighted at 5% of the potential bonus
award);
•
Establishing of a new supply chain for tesetaxel (weighted at 15% of the
potential bonus award);
•
Developing a new equity incentive plan for consideration by the Compensation
Committee that will effectively attract and retain high-performing personnel
(weighted at 15% of the potential bonus award); and
•
Maintaining relations with the medical community by organizing functions and
representing the Company at key meetings (weighted at 25% of the potential bonus
award).
The
foregoing objectives for each of the executive officers do not disclose
additional detail, such as timing, because such disclosure would provide the
Company’s competitors with an undue competitive advantage. As a
biopharmaceutical company, the Company faces intense competition from large and
mid-sized biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in the development
of oncology products, many of which have substantially greater financial,
marketing, sales, distribution, manufacturing and technological resources than
the Company. To effectively compete, the Company must take every precaution in
creating and maintaining its competitive advantages, including protecting its
short- and long-term research and development plans and strategies. In addition,
as many of the Company’s pre-clinical research and development activities are
subject to confidentiality obligations, disclosure of more specific goals and
objectives would violate existing agreements among the Company and its research
and development partners and significantly impair the Company’s ability to enter
into such agreements in the future.
Each
executive officer has a target bonus opportunity that, in the case of Dr.
Warrell and Dr. Itri, is determined in accordance with their respective
employment agreements, or is otherwise set by the Committee each year based on
its comparison of the total compensation opportunity of the Company’s executive
officers against the total compensation opportunity of similarly situated
executives at the companies identified above. In assessing the total
compensation opportunity, the Committee also takes into account the executive
officer’s relative experience in his or her position and in the industry
generally, and most especially for the last several years, the Company’s overall
financial position.
For
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company did not award cash bonuses to its
named executive officers due to the Company’s overall financial
condition. In 2010, the target bonus level set for each of the
Company’s executive officers will be maintained as shown in the tables
below. The Committee believes that the projected bonuses that may be
paid to the named executive officers for fiscal year 2010 will be reasonably
consistent with the average bonuses awarded by its peers after considering the
level of attainment of the applicable performance goals described
above.
The table
below details fiscal year 2009 annual bonus targets and actual payouts for each
of the named executive officers.
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
2009 Target
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
2009 Target
Bonus
(% Salary)
|
|
|
2009 Actual
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
2009 Actual
Bonus
(% Salary)
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
$ |
163,865 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Siegel
|
|
Vice
President, Finance
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loretta
M. Itri
|
|
President,
Pharmaceutical Development, and Chief Medical Officer
|
|
$ |
140,250 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
Lloyd Sanders
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
$ |
85,500 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
As
described above, the business performance of the Company was insufficient in
2009 to warrant the payment of cash incentive bonuses to our employees,
including executive officers.
The
dollar amount of the fiscal year 2010 annual bonus target for the named
executive officer are as shown below:
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
2010 Target
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
2010 Target
Bonus
(% Salary)
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
$ |
163,865 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Siegel
|
|
Vice
President, Finance
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loretta
M. Itri
|
|
President,
Pharmaceutical Development, and Chief Medical Officer
|
|
$ |
140,250 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
Lloyd Sanders
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
$ |
85,500 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation earned by
or paid to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers
(collectively, the “named executive officers”) during the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (3)
|
|
|
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr. M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman
and
|
|
2009
|
|
|
422,123 |
(4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,060,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,093 |
(5) |
|
|
10,511,216 |
|
Chief
Executive
|
|
2008
|
|
|
409,662 |
(6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
31,060 |
(5) |
|
|
440,722 |
|
Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
41,096 |
(5) |
|
|
559,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Siegel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice
President,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
217,269 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,118,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,652 |
(7) |
|
|
1,339,921 |
|
Finance
|
|
2008
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,518 |
(7) |
|
|
237,918 |
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
196,846 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,250 |
(7) |
|
|
212,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loretta
M. Itri, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President,
Pharm
|
|
2009
|
|
|
483,683 |
(8) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,447,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,667 |
(9) |
|
|
3,940,350 |
|
Development
and
|
|
2008
|
|
|
467,500 |
(10) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,061 |
(9) |
|
|
487,561 |
|
Chief
Medical Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
467,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,836 |
(9) |
|
|
508,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
Lloyd Sanders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Vice President
|
|
2009
|
|
|
294,865 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,677,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,291 |
(11) |
|
|
1,976,156 |
|
and
Chief
|
|
2008
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26,650 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,642 |
(11) |
|
|
317,292 |
|
Operating
Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
40,405 |
(11) |
|
|
336,805 |
|
(1)
|
These
amounts reflect grants of restricted stock units. The dollar amounts for
the awards represent the grant-date fair value-based amounts of the
restricted stock units.
|
(2)
|
These
amounts reflect the grant-date fair value-based amounts of stock options
granted in January 2007. Due to the decline in the stock price of Genta,
the exercise price of these stock options were significantly above the
market price of Genta’s shares, and in 2009, these stock options, along
with all other outstanding stock options, were subsequently exchanged for
restricted stock units.
|
(3)
|
As
described above, no payments were made for 2009, 2008 or 2007 performance
under our cash incentive bonus
program.
|
(4)
|
Dr.
Warrell deferred his salary from January 1, 2009 through July 3, 2009,
totaling $200,750.
|
(5)
|
All
other compensation for 2009 includes $6,000 for auto allowance, $12,872
for long-term disability (including $4,094 for income tax gross-up),
$9,336 for life insurance (including $2,501 for income tax gross-up and
$885 Company match to the 401(k) Plan. All other compensation for 2008
includes $6,000 for auto allowance, $4,068 for long-term disability
(including $1,139 for income tax gross-up), $9,492 for life insurance
(including $2,657 for income tax gross-up) and $11,500 Company match to
the 401(k) Plan. All other compensation for 2007 includes
$6,000 for auto allowance, $13,419 for long-term disability (including
$4,641 for income tax gross-up), $10,427 for life insurance, (including
$3,592 for income tax gross-up) and $11,250 Company match to the 401(k)
Plan.
|
(6)
|
Dr.
Warrell deferred his salary from April 19, 2008 through August 17, 2008,
totaling $178,104.
|
(7)
|
All
other compensation for 2009 includes $1,017 for life insurance (including
$312 for income tax gross-up) and $3,635 Company match to the 401(k) Plan.
All other compensation for 2008 includes $1,018 for life insurance
(including $313 for income tax gross-up) and $10,500 Company match to the
401(k) Plan. All other compensation for 2007 includes $11,250
Company match to the 401(k) Plan.
|
(8)
|
Dr.
Itri deferred her salary from January 1, 2009 through July 3, 2009,
totaling $233,750.
|
(9)
|
All
other compensation for 2009 includes $6,753 for long-term disability
(including $2,146 for income tax gross-up), $2,015 for life insurance
(including $762 for income tax gross-up) and $899 Company match to the
401(k) Plan. All other compensation for 2008 includes $6,605 for long-term
disability (including $1,998 for income tax gross-up), $1,956 for life
insurance (including $703 for income tax gross-up) and $11,500 Company
match to the 401(k) Plan. All other compensation for 2007
includes $6,770 for long-term disability (including $2,161 for income tax
gross-up), $3,816 for life insurance (including $1,315 for income tax
gross-up) and $11,250 Company match to the 401(k)
Plan.
|
(10)
|
Dr.
Itri deferred her salary from April 19, 2008 through August 17, 2008,
totaling $203,010.
|
(11)
|
All
other compensation for 2009 includes $4,291 for long-term disability
(including $1,029 for income tax gross-up). All other compensation for
2008 includes $4,326 for long-term disability (including $1,064 for income
tax gross-up) and $1,316 Company match to the 401(k) Plan. All other
compensation for 2007 includes $4,497 for long-term disability (including
$1,235 for income tax gross-up), $24,658 relocation reimbursement
(including $6,106 for income tax gross-up) and $11,250 Company match to
the 401(k) Plan.
|
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
The
following table provides summary information concerning each grant of an award
made to a named executive officer in 2009 under the 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
|
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Threshold
(# Shares)
|
|
|
Target
#
Shares)
|
|
|
Maximum
(# Shares)
|
|
|
(#) (2)
|
|
|
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
|
|
|
($/sh)
|
|
|
($) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Warrell
|
|
8/31/2009
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26,475 |
(4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
10,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Siegel
|
|
8/31/2009
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,942 |
(5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Itri
|
|
8/31/2009
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
4,675 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,072 |
(6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Sanders
|
|
8/31/2009
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,412 |
(7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
(1)
|
Reflects
the range of payouts in thousands of dollars targeted for 2009 performance
under the Genta Cash Incentive Bonus Program, which would ordinarily be
paid in January 2010; however, no payments were earned based on 2009
performance.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
restricted stock units awarded August 31, 2009. Units are shown in
thousands.
|
(3)
|
Based
on the $0.38 closing price of our common stock on August 31, 2009 and
value is shown in thousands of
dollars.
|
(4)
|
The
Initial Grant covered 26,474,679 shares. These restricted stock units vest
as follows: sixty percent (60%) of the Initial Grant amount, or 15,884,807
shares (the “Service Grant”), shall vest as follows: 25%, or 3,971,202
shares, on the grant date, with the balance of the 60%, or 11,913,605
shares, vesting in thirteen (13) equal portions on quarterly anniversaries
from the grant date, so as to be fully vested on December 31, 2012,
provided Dr. Warrell continues in employment through each such date. Forty
percent (40%) of the Initial Grant, or 10,589,872 shares, shall comprise
the “Incentive Grant”. Half of the Incentive Grant, comprising twenty
percent (20%) of the Initial Grant, or 5,294,936 shares, shall vest on the
date the Company has received notice from the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) or from the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) that
Genasense®
has been approved for marketing by FDA or EMEA. The second half of the
Incentive Grant, comprising 20% of the Initial Grant, or 5,294,936 shares,
shall vest on the date when the market capitalization of the Company first
exceeds ten (10) times the market capitalization value as of the Initial
Grant date.
|
(5)
|
The
Initial Grant covered 2,941,631 shares. These restricted stock units vest
as follows: twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares shall vest as
follows: (i) 245,136 shares on November 21, 2009, (ii) 245,136
shares on March 22, 2010 and (iii) 245,136 shares on May 17, 2010,
provided Mr. Siegel continues in employment through each such date. The
remaining shares shall vest in three equal installments on August 31,
2010, August 31, 2011 and August 31, 2012, respectively, provided Mr.
Siegel continues in employment through each such
date.
|
(6)
|
The
Initial Grant covered 9,071,990 shares. These restricted stock units vest
as follows: twenty percent (20%) of the Initial Grant amount, or 1,814,398
shares (the “Service Grant”), shall vest as follows: 25%, or 453,600
shares, on the grant date, with the balance of the 20%, or 1,360,798
shares, vesting in thirteen (13) equal portions on quarterly anniversaries
from the grant date, so as to be fully vested on December 31,
2012. Eighty percent (80%) of the Initial Grant, or 7,257,592
shares, shall comprise the “Incentive Grant”. Half of the
Incentive Grant, comprising forty percent (40%) of the Initial Grant, or
3,628,796 shares, shall vest on the date the Company has received notice
from the FDA that Genasense®
has been approved for marketing by FDA in the United States, provided Dr.
Itri continues in employment through each such date. The second half of
the Incentive Grant, comprising 40% of the Initial Grant, or 3,628,796
shares, shall vest on the date the Company has received notice from the
from the EMEA that Genasense®
has been approved for marketing by EMEA in Europe, provided Dr. Itri
continues in employment through such
date.
|
(7)
|
The
Initial Grant covered 4,412,446 shares. These restricted stock units vest
as follows: twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares shall vest as
follows: (i) 367,704 shares on November 21, 2009, (ii) 367,704
shares on March 22, 2010 and (iii) 367,704 shares on May 17, 2010,
provided Mr. Sanders continue in employment through each such date.
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares shall vest when the gross revenues
of all products owned or in-licensed by Genta and then
marketed by either Genta or any partner licensed to market or
co-market such products (without regard for whether Genta or the partner
primarily accounts for such revenues, books such revenues) in any calendar
year equals or exceeds $100,000,000. Such vesting will occur on the date
on which the Committee first certifies the gross revenues as having
exceeded $100,000,000 in any calendar year, (but in any event no later
than 30 days after release of Genta’s quarterly SEC Form 10-Q as evidence
this milestone has been achieved). The remaining shares shall vest in two
equal installments on August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2011, respectively,
provided Mr. Sanders continues in employment through each such
date.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards
The
following table lists all outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31,
2009.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
|
|
|
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#) (1)
|
|
|
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($) (2)
|
|
Dr.
Warrell
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,587,046 |
|
|
|
1,878,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Siegel
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,696,495 |
|
|
|
234,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Itri
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,513,714 |
|
|
|
740,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sanders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,044,742 |
|
|
|
351,892 |
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects
restricted stock units awarded in August 2009, with vesting schedule
listed in the section labeled “Grants of Plan-Based awards”. Each
restricted stock unit will vest in full on an accelerated basis upon
certain changes in control as described in more detail under the heading
“Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements”
herein.
|
|
(2)
|
Based
on the $0.087 closing price of our common stock on December 31,
2009.
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vesting During 2009
This
table shows restricted stock units held by our executives which vested during
2009. The dollar values shown in this table are not the grant-date fair value
disclosed elsewhere in this report.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized on
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized on
Vesting (#)
(1)
|
|
Dr.
Warrell
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,887,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,645,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Siegel
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
246,736 |
|
|
$ |
41,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Itri
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
558,276 |
|
|
$ |
187,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Sanders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
369,004 |
|
|
$ |
62,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Equals the closing price of our common stock on the vesting dates multiplied by
the number of restricted stock units that vested.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The
following table shows the deferred compensation activity for each named
executive officer during the 2009 fiscal year.
Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Dr.
Warrell
|
|
|
200,750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
378,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.
Itri
|
|
|
233,750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
436,760 |
|
Employment
Agreements
Employment
Agreement with Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
Pursuant
to an employment agreement dated as of January 1, 2006, by and between
Genta and Dr. Warrell, that was subsequently amended and restated as of
November 30, 2007, and later amended as of December 31, 2008,
hereinafter referred to as the Warrell employment agreement, Dr. Warrell
continues to serve as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Warrell
employment agreement has an initial term of three years ending on
December 31, 2010 and provides for automatic extensions for additional
one-year periods. Under the Warrell employment agreement, Dr. Warrell’s $480,000
annual base salary was reduced by 15% effective January 1, 2008; he
now receives a base salary of $408,000 per annum with annual percentage
increases equal to at least the Consumer Price Index for the calendar year
preceding the year of the increase. At the end of each calendar year, Dr.
Warrell is eligible for a cash incentive bonus ranging from 0% to 60% of his
annual base salary, subject to the achievement of agreed-upon goals and
objectives.
Dr.
Warrell is entitled to receive annual stock option awards for the purchase of up
to 225,000 shares of common stock, depending upon the achievement of agreed-upon
goals and objectives. Such options will become fully exercisable upon a “Trigger
Event” (i.e. the sale of Genasense® or our
change in control). If a Trigger Event occurs during the term of the Warrell
employment agreement or within 12 months thereafter, Dr. Warrell will be
entitled to receive the stock option grants that he would have been entitled to
receive in respect of the calendar year in which the Trigger Event occurs
(assuming attainment of “target” levels of performance on all goals and
objectives for the year), and such option will be fully vested and exercisable
upon grant.
We may
also, from time to time, grant Dr. Warrell additional cash, stock options,
equity and/or other long-term incentive awards in the sole discretion of our
Board. Dr. Warrell continues to be entitled to any and all medical insurance,
dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance and other benefit plans,
which are generally available to our senior executives. He is also entitled to
receive supplemental life insurance and supplemental disability insurance, as
well as premium payments for medical malpractice insurance up to a maximum of
$25,000 annually. The aggregate amount of the benefits Dr. Warrell may receive
are subject to parachute payment limitations under Section 280G of the Internal
Revenue Code.
In the
event Dr. Warrell’s employment is terminated, he will be eligible for certain
benefits, the value of which have been estimated herein, but only to the extent
that the benefit is not otherwise provided to employees on a non-discriminatory
basis. In the event Dr. Warrell’s employment is terminated, he will be entitled
to receive his accrued but unpaid base salary through his termination date, his
accrued but unpaid expenses, a lump sum payment of his accrued vacation days
(unless he is terminated by us for cause or he terminates his employment without
good reason (both defined in the Warrell employment agreement)), his accrued but
unpaid cash incentive bonus, a lump sum payment of his pro-rated cash incentive
bonus for the year of his termination, valued up to $163,200 (unless he is
terminated by us for cause or he terminates his employment without good reason),
and any other benefits due him in accordance with applicable plans, programs or
agreements. In addition to the benefits listed in the preceding sentence, in the
event we terminate Dr. Warrell’s employment without cause or Dr. Warrell
terminates his employment for good reason and he executes a release, Dr. Warrell
will be entitled to receive the base salary he would have received during the
twelve-month period following the date of termination, valued at $408,000, for a
total potential payment of $571,200. If we terminate Dr. Warrell’s employment in
anticipation of our change in control or, if either party terminates his
employment upon a change in control or within 13 months following a change in
control, Dr. Warrell will instead receive a lump sum payment equal to two times
his annual base salary, valued at $816,000 and two times his target bonus for
the calendar year of termination, valued at $326,400, for a total potential
payment of $1,142,000. Dr. Warrell will also receive immediate vesting of all
stock options that vest solely as a result of his continued employment however,
based on our stock price on December 31, 2008 of $0.0061, those options did not
have value to Dr. Warrell at such date. Finally, if either party gives notice
that they do not wish to extend the Warrell employment agreement, Dr. Warrell
will be entitled to receive his accrued, but unpaid, base salary through his
termination date; his accrued, but unpaid, expenses; a lump sum payment of his
accrued vacation days; his accrued but unpaid cash incentive bonus; a lump sum
payment of his pro-rated cash incentive bonus for the year of his
termination, valued up to $163,200; and any other benefits due him in accordance
with applicable plans, programs or agreements. If Dr. Warrell gives notice that
he does not wish to extend the Warrell employment agreement, he will also
receive immediate vesting of all stock options that would have vested during the
90 days following his termination date, if such stock options vest solely as a
result of his continued employment. If we give notice that we do not wish to
extend the Warrell employment agreement, he will receive immediate vesting of
all stock options that vest solely as a result of his continued
employment.
Employment
Agreement with Loretta M. Itri, M.D
Pursuant
to an employment agreement dated as of March 28, 2006, by and between
Genta and Dr. Itri, signed on July 27, 2006, and amended as of
December 31, 2008, Dr. Itri continues to serve as our President,
Pharmaceutical Development and Chief Medical Officer. The employment agreement
had an initial term of three years, beginning March 28, 2006 and
continuing through March 27, 2009 and provides for automatic
extensions for additional one-year periods. The agreement provides for a base
annual salary in 2006 of $445,200, which may be reviewed annually for
discretionary increases in a manner similar to our other senior executives and
an annual cash incentive bonus ranging from 0% to 50% of her annual base salary
to be paid if mutually agreed-upon goals and objectives are achieved for the
year. Dr. Itri was also granted an incentive stock option to purchase 1,666
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $477.00 per share, of which
666 shares become exercisable upon the first FDA approval of Genasense®, 666
shares become exercisable upon approval by the EMEA in Europe of Genasense® in any
first indication and 333 shares become exercisable over a period of
approximately 32 months from the grant date by means of (i) an initial
amount of 37 shares to be exercisable and vest on the date of grant, (ii) an
additional amount of 286 shares in 31 equal monthly increments of 9 shares each,
commencing on August 1, 2006 and continuing on the first day of each
of the next successive 30 calendar months, and (iii) a final amount of 9
shares on March 1, 2009. The preceding reference to the number of
shares granted takes into account the 1:6 reverse stock split in July 2007
and the 1:50 reverse stock split in July 2009. We may also, from time to time,
grant Dr. Itri additional stock options consistent with the stock option
guidelines applicable to our other senior executives. Dr. Itri is entitled
to any and all medical insurance, dental insurance, life insurance, disability
insurance and other benefit plans, which are generally available to our senior
executives. She is also entitled to receive supplemental life insurance and
supplemental disability insurance. The aggregate amount of the benefits
Dr. Itri may receive are subject to parachute payment limitations under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
In the
event Dr. Itri’s employment is terminated, she will be eligible for certain
benefits, the value of which have been estimated herein, but only to the extent
that the benefit is not otherwise provided to employees on a non-discriminatory
basis. In the event Dr. Itri’s employment is terminated, she will be entitled to
receive her accrued, but unpaid, base salary through her termination date; her
accrued, but unpaid, expenses; her accrued vacation days; any earned but unpaid
cash incentive bonus; and any other benefits due her in accordance with
applicable plans, programs or agreements. In addition to the benefits listed in
the preceding sentence, in the event we terminate Dr. Itri’s employment without
good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), due to a change of
control, or Dr. Itri terminates her employment for good reason (as defined in
the employment agreement), and she executes a release, Dr. Itri will be entitled
to receive a lump sum payment equal to her current annualized base salary,
valued at $467,500 plus a pro-rated cash incentive bonus for the calendar year
of termination, valued up to $140,250, for a total potential payment
of $607,750, and each of her outstanding stock options will immediately vest to
the extent vesting depends solely on her continued employment, however, based on
our stock price on December 31, 2008 of $0.0061, those options did not have
value to Dr. Itri at such date. Finally, if either party gives notice that the
employment agreement will not be extended, Dr. Itri will be entitled to receive
her accrued, but unpaid, base salary through her termination date; her accrued,
but unpaid, expenses; her accrued vacation days; any earned, but unpaid, cash
incentive bonus; a pro-rated cash incentive bonus for the year of her
termination, valued up to $140,250, for a total potential payment of $607,750;
and any other benefits due her in accordance with applicable plans, programs, or
agreements. If we give notice that we do not wish to extend Dr. Itri’s
employment agreement, she will also receive immediate vesting of all stock
options that would have vested during the 90 days following her termination
date, if such stock options would have vested solely as a result of her
continued employment.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of
the members of our Compensation Committee, Mr. Watson, Mr. Parios and Dr. Von
Hoff, had any “interlock” relationship to report during our year ended December
31, 2009. None of our executive officers have served as a Director or member of
the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee (or other committee serving
an equivalent function) of any other entity while an executive officer of that
other entity served as a Director of or member of our Board of Directors or our
Compensation Committee.
Compensation
Committee Report
The
Compensation Committee evaluates and establishes compensation for executive
officers and oversees the Company's management stock plans, and other management
incentive, benefit and perquisite programs. Management has the primary
responsibility for the Company's financial statements and reporting process,
including the disclosure of executive compensation.
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis with management and based on such review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy
Statement.
This
report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by
reference this statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the
extent the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall
not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
Members
of the Compensation Committee
|
|
Douglas
G. Watson, Chairman
|
Christopher
P. Parios
|
Daniel
D. Von Hoff, M.D.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table summarizes the number of outstanding options granted to
employees and directors, as well as the number of securities remaining available
for future issuance, under our equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2009.
Plan category
|
|
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding RSUs
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding RSUs
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the first column)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
44,402,970 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
* |
|
|
29,721,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,402,970 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
29,721,227 |
|
* As of
December 31, 2009, we had 44,402,970 restricted stock units (RSUs) outstanding,
with vesting of those RSUs taking place through 2012.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit
Committee of the Board is currently composed of three Directors, each of whom is
independent, and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The
members of our Audit Committee are Christopher P. Parios, Douglas D. Von Hoff,
M.D. and Douglas G. Watson. Mr. Watson serves as Chairman of this committee.
Among our other responsibilities, we recommend to the Board the selection of the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit
Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with
management and Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP, the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the
preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements;
accounting and financial reporting principles; establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e));
establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)); evaluating the effectiveness of
disclosure controls and procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting; and evaluating any change in internal control
over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting. Amper
Politziner & Mattia, LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit
of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the
conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
During
the course of 2009, management continued the process of documenting, testing and
evaluating the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit
Committee was kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and provided
oversight to management during the process. In connection with this oversight,
the Committee received periodic updates provided by management at each regularly
scheduled Committee meeting. At the conclusion of the process, management
provided the Committee with and the Committee reviewed a report on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The
Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the
SEC, as well as Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP’s Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, related to its audit of the consolidated financial statements. The
Committee recommended that the audited financial statements be included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
Committee continues to oversee the Company’s efforts related to its internal
control over financial reporting and management’s preparations for the
evaluation in 2010.
The Audit
Committee discussed with Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP the matters required
to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended,
“Communication with Audit Committees”, as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in Rule 3200T and PCAOB Auditing Standard No.
5, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated
with an Audit of Financial Statements.” In addition, Amper Politziner &
Mattia, LLP has provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and
the letter required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as
amended, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” and the Audit
Committee discussed with Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP their firm’s
independence.
A
representative of Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP is expected to attend the
Annual Meeting, has not asked for an opportunity to address Stockholders and
will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees for independent registered
public accounting firm for 2009 and
2008
Set forth
below are the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for services rendered by Amper
Politziner & Mattia, LLP:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Audit
fees
|
|
$ |
183,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Audit-related
fees
|
|
|
117,350 |
|
|
|
28,500 |
|
Total
Audit & Audit-related fees
|
|
$ |
300,350 |
|
|
$ |
203,500 |
|
Tax
fees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
All
other fees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
fees
|
|
$ |
300,350 |
|
|
$ |
203,500 |
|
Audit
fees consist of fees billed for services rendered for the audit of our financial
statements and review of our financial statements included in our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q and services provided in connection with other statutory or
regulatory filings.
Audit-related
fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial
statements and not reported under Audit fees. During 2009, Amper Politziner
& Mattia, LLP, or Amper, audited our 401K plan at December 31, 2008 and
provided assistance in our filings on Forms S-1 and S-3. During 2008, Amper
audited our 401K plan at December 31, 2007 and provided assistance on our filing
of a Form S-1.
Tax fees
consist of fees billed for professional services related to the preparation of
our U.S. federal and state income tax returns and tax advice. No such
fees were billed in 2009 or 2008.
The Audit
Committee pre-approved all Audit-related fees. After considering the provision
of services encompassed within the above disclosures about fees, the Audit
Committee has determined that the provision of such services is compatible with
maintaining Amper’s independence.
Pre-approval policy of
services performed by independent registered
public accounting firm
The Audit
Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit related services,
tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to
one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or
category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit
Committee has delegated the pre-approval authority to its chairperson when
expedition of services is necessary. The independent registered public
accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the full
Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval and the
fees for the services performed to date.
Based
upon our discussion with management and the independent registered public
accounting firm and our review of the representation of management and the
report of the independent registered public accounting firm to us, we
recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission and that Amper
Politziner & Mattia, LLP be appointed as the independent registered public
accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31,
2010.
This
report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by
any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically
incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed
under such Acts.
Members
of the Audit Committee
|
|
Douglas
G. Watson, Chairman
|
Christopher
P. Parios
|
Daniel
D. Von Hoff, M.D.
|
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth, as of April 1, 2010, certain information with
respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock (the only voting class
outstanding), (i) by each Director, (ii) by each of the named executive officers
and (iii) by all officers and Directors as a group.
|
|
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Name and Address (1)
|
|
Number of Shares (2)
|
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
|
|
|
19,206,318 |
(3) |
|
|
4.999 |
% |
Loretta
M. Itri, M.D.
|
|
|
19,206,318 |
(4) |
|
|
4.999 |
% |
Gary
Siegel
|
|
|
490,272 |
(5) |
|
|
* |
|
W.
Lloyd Sanders
|
|
|
736,326 |
(6) |
|
|
* |
|
Martin
J. Driscoll (7)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Christopher
P. Parios
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Daniel
D. Von Hoff, M.D.
|
|
|
220,658 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
Douglas
G. Watson
|
|
|
118,358 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a group
|
|
|
20,771,932 |
(9) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
*
|
Less
than one percent (1%).
|
(1)
|
The
address of each named holder is in care of Genta Incorporated, 200 Connell
Drive, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922.
|
(2)
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and
generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.
Shares of common stock subject to restricted stock units that will vest
within 60 days of April 1, 2010 or issuable on conversion of Senior
Secured Convertible Promissory Notes due June 9, 2011 are deemed
outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such
securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of
any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to
community property laws where applicable, the person named in the table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common
stock shown as beneficially owned by
them.
|
(3)
|
Consists
of RSUs that will vest for 1,832,862 shares of common stock held by Dr.
Warrell and RSUs that will vest for 209,354 shares of common stock held by
Dr. Warrell’s wife, Dr. Itri. Also includes 17,164,102 shares
of common stock issuable upon the conversion of Senior Secured Convertible
Promissory Notes due June 9, 2011.
|
(4)
|
Consists
of RSUs that will vest for 209,354 shares of common stock held by Dr, Itri
and RSUs for 1,832,862 shares of common stock held by Dr. Warrell. Also
includes 17,164,102 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of
Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes due June 9,
2011.
|
(5)
|
Consists
of RSUs that will vest for 490,272 shares of common
stock.
|
(6)
|
Consists
of 918 shares of common stock and RSUs that will vest for 735,408 shares
of common stock.
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Driscoll resigned from the Board effective August 26,
2009.
|
(8)
|
Consists
of shares of common stock.
|
(9)
|
Consists
of 339,934 shares of common stock, RSUs that will vest for 3,267,896
shares of common stock and 17,164,102 shares of common stock issuable upon
the conversion of Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes due June 9,
2011.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The
following table sets forth, as of April 1, 2010, certain information with
respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by persons known by us
to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock. The
information in this table is based solely on statements in filings with the SEC
or other reliable information.
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Tang
Capital Partners, LP
4401
Eastgate Mall
San
Diego, CA 92121
|
|
|
20,593,669
|
(1)
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Felix
J. Baker and Julian C. Baker
Baker
Brothers Advisors
667
Madison Avenue
New
York, NY 10021
|
|
|
19,780,851
|
(1)
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Cat
Trail Private Equity Fund, LLC
8
Wells Hill Rd
Weston
CT 06883
|
|
|
21,128,048
|
(1)
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Boxer
Capital LLC
445
Marine View Ave, 100
Del
Mar, CA 92014
|
|
|
16,900,200
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Arcus
Ventures Fund, LP
55
Broad Street
Suite
1840
New
YorK, NY 10004
|
|
|
23,315,632
|
(3)
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
(1)
|
Such
information is based upon our review of a Schedule 13G filed by the
holder with the SEC for the period ended December 31,
2009.
|
(2)
|
Such
information is based upon our review of a Schedule 13G filed by the holder
with the SEC on March 15, 2010.
|
(3)
|
Such
information is based upon our review of a Schedule 13G filed by the holder
with the SEC on March 16, 2010.
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our Directors
and executive officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of our common
stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes
in ownership of our common stock.
To our
knowledge based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us
and the reporting persons’ representations to us that no other reports were
required during the year ended December 31, 2009, our directors and officers
complied with their respective filing requirements under Section 16(a) on a
timely basis, with the following exceptions: Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D., Douglas
G. Watson and Christopher P. Parios filed Form 4s on September 9, 2009,
September 10, 2009 and September 11, 2009, respectively to report the August 26,
2009 exchange of stock options that had been granted under the Non-Employee
Director 1998 Stock Option Plan and the issuance of shares of common stock in
accordance with the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Raymond P. Warrell, Jr. M.D.,
Gary Siegel, Loretta M. Itri M.D. and W. Lloyd Sanders filed Form 4s on
September 11, 2009 to report the August 31, 2009 exchange of stock options that
had been granted under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and the issuance of RSUs in
accordance with the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D. filed a
Form 4 on December 2, 2009 to report the sale of shares of common stock from
November 23, 2009 through November 25, 2009. Raymond P. Warrell, Jr. M.D. filed
a Form 4 on December 8, 2009 to report the sale of shares of common stock from
December 3, 2009 through December 8, 2009 and filed a Form 4 on December 14,
2009 to report the sale of shares of common stock from December 9, 2009 through
December 14, 2009.
HOUSEHOLDING
Some
banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the
practice of “householding” Proxy Statements and annual reports. This
means that only one copy of our Proxy Statement or annual report on Form 10-K
may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly
deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you write or call us at the
following address or phone number: 200 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, NJ
07922, (908) 286-9800. If you want to receive separate copies of the annual
report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement in the future, or if you are receiving
multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you
should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holders, or you may
contact us at the above address and phone number.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEAR
The
deadline for submitting a stockholder proposal for inclusion in the Company’s
Proxy Statement and form of proxy for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of
stockholders is December 31, 2010.
Proposals
of stockholders intended to be presented at the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of
stockholders called for a date within thirty days of May 19, 2011 and not
included in our proxy materials must comply with the advance notice provision in
Section 3 of Article I of our by-laws. For notice to be timely, it shall be
delivered not later than the close of business on the 90th calendar day nor
earlier than the close of business on the 120th calendar day prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting; provided, however, that in
the event that the date of the Annual Meeting is more than 30 calendar days
before or more than 60 calendar days after such anniversary date, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the close of
business on the 120th
calendar day prior to such Annual Meeting and not later than the close of
business on the later of the 90th
calendar day prior to such Annual Meeting or the 10th
calendar day following the calendar day on which public announcement of the date
of such meeting is first made by the Corporation.
All
stockholder proposals should be directed to our interim Corporate Secretary at
our address listed on the top of page one of this Proxy Statement.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
We will
provide without charge to each person solicited by this Proxy Statement, on the
written request of such person, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including the financial statements and financial statement schedules, as filed
with the SEC for our most recent year. Such written requests should be directed
to Gary Siegel, our interim Principal Financial Officer, interim Principal
Accounting Officer and interim Corporate Secretary, at our address listed on the
top of page one of this Proxy Statement.
By
order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
/s/
RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.
|
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
OF
RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
GENTA
INCORPORATED
Pursuant
to Section 242 of the
General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
Genta
Incorporated (the “Corporation”), a corporation duly organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
does hereby certify as follows:
1. The
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, filed on August 8,
1994, as amended, is hereby amended by adding at the end of the first paragraph
of Article IV(A) the following new paragraphs:
“Effective
as of the close of business on the day that the Certificate of Amendment which
contains this provision is filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware (the “Effective Time”), each [__] shares of Common Stock
issued and outstanding at such time (“Existing Common Stock”) shall be and
hereby are automatically reclassified and changed into one share of Common Stock
(“New Common Stock”), provided that no fractional shares of New Common Stock
shall be issued, and in lieu of a fractional share of New Common Stock to which
any holder is entitled, such holder shall receive a cash payment in an amount to
be determined by multiplying the fractional share by the fair market value of a
share of New Common Stock at the Effective Time (the “Reverse stock
split”). Shares of Common Stock that were outstanding prior to the
Effective Time, and that are not outstanding after and as a result of the
Reverse stock split, shall resume the status of authorized but unissued shares
of Common Stock.
From and
after the Effective Time, the term “New Common Stock” as used in this Article IV
shall mean Common Stock as provided in this Restated Certificate of
Incorporation. The par value of the New Common Stock shall be $0.001
per share.”
2. The
foregoing Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by the Corporation’s
Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with the provisions of the
Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said
Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Raymond P.
Warrell, Jr., M.D., its Chief Executive Officer, this ____ day of _______,
_____.
GENTA
INCORPORATED
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
|
Raymond
P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
GENTA
INCORPORATED
2009
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(As
Amended and Restated April 1, 2010)
Page
|
GENERAL
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
Purpose
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
Administration
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
Persons
Eligible for Awards
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
Types
of Awards Under Plan
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
Shares
Available for Awards
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
Definitions
of Certain Terms
|
4
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE
II
|
AWARDS
UNDER THE PLAN
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Agreements
Evidencing Awards
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
No
Rights as a Shareholder
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
Grant
of Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Reload
Options
|
6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
Exercise
of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
|
7
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
Termination
of Employment; Death
|
8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
Grant
of Restricted Stock
|
9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
Grant
of Restricted Stock Units
|
10
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
Other
Stock-Based Awards
|
10
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
Grant
of Dividend Equivalent Rights
|
10
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
Right
of Recapture
|
10
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE
III
|
AUTOMATIC
GRANT PROGRAM FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
|
11
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Automatic
Grants
|
11
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
Initial
Grants
|
11
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
Annual
Grants
|
11
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
Vesting
of Awards
|
12
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE
IV
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
12
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Amendment
of the Plan; Modification of Awards
|
12
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
Tax
Withholding
|
13
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
Restrictions
|
13
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
Nonassignability
|
13
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
Requirement
of Notification of Election Under Section 83(b) of the
Code
|
14
|
(continued)
Page
4.6
|
Requirement
of Notification Upon Disqualifying Disposition Under Section 421(b) of the
Code
|
14
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
Change
in Control, Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger
|
14
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
Right
of Discharge Reserved
|
15
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
Nature
of Payments
|
15
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
Non-Uniform
Determinations
|
16
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
Other
Payments or Awards
|
16
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
Section
Headings
|
16
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
Effective
Date and Term of Plan
|
16
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
Governing
Law
|
16
|
ARTICLE
I
GENERAL
1.1 Purpose
The
purpose of the Genta Incorporated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide
for officers, other employees and directors of, and consultants to, Genta
Incorporated (the “Company”) and its
subsidiaries an incentive (a) to enter into and remain in the service of the
Company, (b) to enhance the long-term performance of the Company, and (c) to
acquire a proprietary interest in the success of the Company.
1.2 Administration
1.2.1 Subject
to Section 1.2.6, the Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee
(the “Committee”) of the
board of directors of the Company (the “Board”), which shall
consist of not less than two directors. The members of the Committee
shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board. To
the extent required for transactions under the Plan to qualify for the
exemptions available under Rule 16b-3 (“Rule 16b-3”)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), all
actions relating to awards to persons subject to Section 16 of the 1934 Act
shall be taken by the Board unless each person who serves on the Committee is a
“non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 or such actions are
taken by a sub-committee of the Committee (or the Board) comprised solely of
“non-employee directors”. To the extent required for compensation
realized from awards under the Plan to be deductible by the Company pursuant to
section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the
regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Code”), the members
of the Committee shall be “outside directors” within the meaning of such section
162(m).
1.2.2 The
Committee shall have the authority (a) to exercise all of the powers granted to
it under the Plan; (b) to construe, interpret and implement the Plan and any
plan agreements executed pursuant to Section 2.1; (c) to prescribe, or amend and
rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including rules governing
its own operations; (d) to make all determinations necessary or advisable in
administering the Plan; (e) to correct any defect, supply any omission and
reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan; (f) to amend the Plan to reflect
changes in applicable law; (g) to determine whether, to what extent and under
what circumstances awards may be settled or exercised in cash, Shares of Common
Stock, other securities, other awards or other property, or canceled, forfeited
or suspended and the method or methods by which awards may be settled, canceled,
forfeited or suspended; (h) to determine whether, to what extent and under what
circumstances cash, shares of Common Stock, other securities, other awards or
other property and other amounts payable with respect to an award shall be
deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the
Committee; (i) to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances
the management of the day-to-day operations of the Plan and the functions of the
Company with respect thereto, including, without limitation, processing of the
exercise of options and holding and sales of option shares by grantees, shall be
delegated to a registered broker-dealer or other qualified third party; and (j)
to direct that a) a stop order may be placed in effect with respect to shares
issued pursuant to the Plan and b) any stock certificate evidencing shares
issued pursuant to the Plan shall bear a legend setting forth such restrictions
on transferability as may apply to such shares pursuant to the
Plan.
1.2.3 Actions
of the Committee shall be taken by the vote of a majority of its
members. Any action may be taken by a written instrument signed by a
majority of the Committee members, and action so taken shall be fully as
effective as if it had been taken by a vote at a meeting.
1.2.4 The
determination of the Committee on all matters relating to the Plan or any plan
agreement shall be final, binding and conclusive.
1.2.5 No
member of the Committee shall be liable for any action or determination made in
good faith with respect to the Plan or any award thereunder.
1.2.6 Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein: (a) until the Board shall
appoint the members of the Committee, the Plan shall be administered by the
Board; and (b) the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time
to time, grant awards or resolve to administer the Plan. In either of
the foregoing events, the Board shall have all of the authority and
responsibility granted to the Committee herein.
1.3 Persons Eligible for
Awards
Awards
under the Plan may be made to such directors (including directors who are not
employees), officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries
(including prospective employees conditioned on their becoming employees), and
to such consultants, advisers and other independent contractors of the Company
and its subsidiaries (collectively, “key persons”), as the
Committee shall select in its discretion.
1.4 Types of Awards Under
Plan
Awards
may be made under the Plan in the form of (a) incentive stock options (within
the meaning of section 422 of the Code); (b) non-qualified stock options; (c)
stock appreciation rights; (d) dividend equivalent rights; (e) restricted stock;
(f) restricted stock units; and (g) other stock-based awards, all as more fully
set forth in Article II. The term “award” means any of the
foregoing. No incentive stock option (other than an incentive stock
option that may be assumed or issued by the Company in connection with a
transaction to which section 424(a) of the Code applies) may be granted to a
person who is not an employee of the Company on the date of grant.
1.5 Shares Available for
Awards
1.5.1 Total shares
available. The shares issuable under the Plan may be
authorized but unissued shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001
per share (“Common
Stock”),or authorized and issued Common Stock held in the Company’s
treasury or acquired by the Company for the purposes of the
Plan. Subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in Section
1.5.3, the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant
to awards granted under the Plan shall be 54,738,066. Such reserve
represents fifteen percent (15%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on
April 1, 2010. The share reserve under the Plan shall
automatically be adjusted on each of September 7, 2010, January 18, 2011 and May
3, 2011 to be equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock as of each such date, respectively. If, after the Plan
Effective Date, any award is forfeited or any award otherwise terminates or is
cancelled without the delivery of shares of Common Stock, then the shares
covered by such award or to which such award relates shall again become
available for transfer pursuant to awards granted or to be granted under this
Plan. Any shares of Common Stock delivered by the Company, any shares
of Common Stock with respect to which awards are made by the Company and any
shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Company becomes obligated to
make awards, through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding
awards previously granted by an acquired entity, shall not be counted against
the shares available for awards under this Plan. The maximum number
of shares of Common Stock for which incentive stock options may be granted over
the term of the Plan shall be 54,738,066 (subject to adjustment from time to
time as provided in Section 1.5.3).
1.5.2 Individual
Limit. The total number of shares of Common Stock with respect
to which stock options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to any one
employee of the Company or a subsidiary during any one calendar year shall not
exceed 28 million shares.
1.5.3 Adjustments. Subject
to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of shares
of Common Stock covered by each outstanding award, the number of shares
available for awards, the number of shares that may be subject to awards to any
one employee, the maximum number of shares for which incentive stock options may
be granted, the maximum number of shares subject to initial grants to
non-employee Board members pursuant to Section 3.2.2, and the price per share of
Common Stock covered by each such outstanding award shall be proportionately
adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common
Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend,
combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or
decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt
of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any
convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected
without receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by
the Committee, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and
conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein or in the applicable
plan agreement, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or
securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no
adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price
of shares of Common Stock subject to an award. After any adjustment
made pursuant to this Section 1.5.3, the number of shares subject to each
outstanding award shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
1.5.4 Except
as provided in this Section 1.5 and in Section 2.3.8, there shall be no limit on
the number or the value of the shares of Common Stock that may be subject to
awards to any individual under the Plan.
1.6 Definitions of Certain
Terms
1.6.1 The
“Fair Market
Value” of a share of Common Stock on any day shall be determined as
follows.
(a) If
the principal market for the Common Stock (the “Market”) is a national
securities exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated
Quotation System (“NASDAQ”) National Market or Small Cap Market, the last sale
price or, if no reported sales take place on the applicable date, the average of
the high bid and low asked price of Common Stock as reported for such Market on
such date or, if no such quotation is made on such date, on the next preceding
day on which there were quotations, provided that such quotations shall have
been made within the ten (10) business days preceding the applicable
date;
(b) If
the Common Stock is actively traded but paragraph (a) does not apply, the
average of the high bid and low asked price for Common Stock on the applicable
date, or, if no such quotations shall have been made on such date, on the next
preceding day on which there were quotations, provided that such quotations
shall have been made within the ten (10) business days preceding the applicable
date; or,
(c) In
the event that neither paragraph (a) nor (b) shall apply, the Fair Market Value
of a share of Common Stock on any day shall be determined in good faith by the
Committee. Fair Market Value shall be determined in a manner that
complies with requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
1.6.2 The
term “incentive stock
option” means an option that is intended to qualify for special federal
income tax treatment pursuant to sections 421 and 422 of the Code, as now
constituted or subsequently amended, or pursuant to a successor provision of the
Code, and which is so designated in the applicable plan
agreement. Any option that is not specifically designated as an
incentive stock option shall under no circumstances be considered an incentive
stock option. Any option that is not an incentive stock option is
referred to herein as a “nonqualified stock
option.”
1.6.3 The
term “employment” means, in
the case of a grantee of an award under the Plan who is not an employee of the
Company, the grantee’s association with the Company or a subsidiary as a
director, consultant, adviser, other independent contractor or
otherwise.
1.6.4 A
grantee shall be deemed to have a “termination of
employment” upon ceasing to be employed by the Company and all of its
subsidiaries or by a corporation assuming awards in a transaction to which
section 424(a) of the Code applies. The Committee may in its
discretion determine (a) whether any leave of absence constitutes a termination
of employment for purposes of the Plan; (b) the impact, if any, of any such
leave of absence on awards theretofore made under the Plan; and (c) when a
change in a non-employee’s association with the Company constitutes a
termination of employment for purposes of the Plan. The Committee
shall have the right to determine whether a grantee’s termination of employment
is a dismissal for cause and the date of termination in such case, which date
the Committee may retroactively deem to be the date of the action that is cause
for dismissal. Such determinations of the Committee shall be final,
binding and conclusive.
1.6.5 The
term “cause,”
when used in connection with termination of a grantee’s employment, shall have
the meaning set forth in any then-effective employment agreement between the
grantee and the Company or a subsidiary thereof. In the absence of
such an employment agreement provision, “cause” means: (a) conviction
of any crime (whether or not involving the Company or its subsidiaries)
constituting a felony in the jurisdiction involved; (b) engaging in any act
which, in each case, subjects, or if generally known would subject, the Company
or its subsidiaries to public ridicule or embarrassment; (c) material violation
of the Company’s or a subsidiary’s policies, including, without limitation,
those relating to sexual harassment or the disclosure or misuse of confidential
information; or (d) serious neglect or misconduct in the performance of the
grantee’s duties for the Company or a subsidiary or willful or repeated failure
or refusal to perform such duties; in each case as determined by the Committee,
which determination shall be final, binding and conclusive.
1.6.6 The
term “date of grant” of an award in this Plan means the date on which
the award is approved by the Committee, or such later date as may be specified
by the Committee in authorizing such award.
ARTICLE
II
AWARDS
UNDER THE PLAN
2.1 Agreements Evidencing
Awards
Each
award granted under the Plan (except an award of unrestricted stock) shall be
evidenced by a written agreement (“plan agreement”)
which shall contain such provisions as the Committee in its discretion deems
necessary or desirable. Such provisions may include, without
limitation, a requirement that the grantee acknowledge that such shares are
acquired for investment purposes only. The Committee may grant awards
in tandem with or in substitution for any other award or awards granted under
this Plan or any award granted under any other plan of the Company or any
subsidiary. Payments or transfers to be made by the Company or any
subsidiary upon the grant, exercise or payment of an award may be made in such
form as the Committee shall determine, including cash, shares of Common Stock,
other securities, other awards or other property and may be made in a single
payment or transfer, in installments or on a deferred basis, in each case in
accordance with rules established by the Committee. By accepting an
award pursuant to the Plan, a grantee thereby agrees that the award shall be
subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan, the applicable plan
agreement, and the determinations of the Committee.
2.2 No Rights as a
Shareholder
No
grantee of an option or stock appreciation right (or other person having the
right to exercise such award) shall have any of the rights of a shareholder of
the Company with respect to shares subject to such award until a) the issuance
of a stock certificate to such person for such shares or b) the book-entry
ownership is reflected for the nominee of such person who holds such shares in
“street name.” Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.5.3, no
adjustment shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights (whether
ordinary or extraordinary, and whether in cash, securities or other property)
for which the record date is prior to the date such shares are
issued.
2.3 Grant of Stock Options,
Stock Appreciation Rights and Reload Options
2.3.1 The
Committee may grant incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options
(collectively, “options”) to purchase
shares of Common Stock from the Company, to such key persons, in such amounts
and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall determine in
its discretion, subject to the provisions of the Plan.
2.3.2 The
Committee may grant stock appreciation rights to such key persons, in such
amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall
determine in its discretion, subject to the provisions of the
Plan. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all
or any part of, or independently of, any option granted under the
Plan. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with a
nonqualified stock option may be granted at or after the date of grant of such
option. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with an
incentive stock option may be granted only at the date of grant of such
option.
2.3.3 The
grantee of a stock appreciation right shall have the right, subject to the terms
of the Plan and the applicable plan agreement, to receive from the Company an
amount equal to (a) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common
Stock on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right over (b) the
exercise price of such right as set forth in the plan agreement (or over the
option exercise price if the stock appreciation right is granted in connection
with an option), multiplied by (c) the number of shares with respect to which
the stock appreciation right is exercised. Payment upon exercise of a
stock appreciation right shall be in cash or in shares of Common Stock (valued
at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation
right) or both, all as the Committee shall determine in its
discretion. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right granted
in connection with an option, the number of shares subject to the option shall
be correspondingly reduced by the number of shares with respect to which the
stock appreciation right is exercised. Upon the exercise of an option
in connection with which a stock appreciation right has been granted, the number
of shares subject to the stock appreciation right shall be correspondingly
reduced by the number of shares with respect to which the option is
exercised.
2.3.4 Each
plan agreement with respect to an option shall set forth the amount (the “option exercise
price”) payable by the grantee to the Company upon exercise of the option
evidenced thereby. The option exercise price per share shall be
determined by the Committee in its discretion; provided, however, that the
option exercise price of any stock option shall be at least 100% of
the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the option is
granted (except as permitted in connection with the assumption or issuance of
options in a transaction to which section 424(a) of the Code
applies).
2.3.5 Each
plan agreement with respect to an option or stock appreciation right shall set
forth the periods during which the award evidenced thereby shall be exercisable,
whether in whole or in part. Such periods shall be determined by the
Committee in its discretion; provided, however, that no stock option (or a stock
appreciation right granted in connection with an incentive stock option) shall
be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant.
2.3.6 The
Committee may in its discretion include in any plan agreement with respect to an
option (the “original option”) a provision that an additional option (the
“additional option”) shall be granted to any grantee who, pursuant to Section
2.4.3(b), delivers shares of Common Stock in partial or full payment of the
exercise price of the original option. The additional option shall be
for a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number thus delivered, shall
have an exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock
on the date of exercise of the original option, and shall have an expiration
date no later than the expiration date of the original option. In the
event that a plan agreement provides for the grant of an additional option, such
agreement shall also provide that the exercise price of the original option be
no less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on its date of
grant, and that any shares that are delivered pursuant to Section 2.4.3(b) in
payment of such exercise price shall have been held for at least six
months.
2.3.7 To
the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of
grant of the option) of the stock with respect to which incentive stock options
granted under this Plan and all other plans of the Company and any subsidiary
are first exercisable by any employee during any calendar year shall exceed the
maximum limit (currently, $100,000), if any, imposed from time to time under
section 422 of the Code, such options shall be treated as nonqualified stock
options.
2.3.8 Notwithstanding
the provisions of Sections 2.3.4 and 2.3.5, to the extent required under section
422 of the Code, an incentive stock option may not be granted under the Plan to
an individual who, at the date of grant of the option, owns stock
possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock of his employer corporation or of its parent or subsidiary corporations
(as such ownership may be determined for purposes of section 422(b)(6) of the
Code) unless (a) at the date of grant of such incentive stock option,
the option exercise price is at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the
shares subject thereto and (b) the incentive stock option by its terms is not
exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date of
grant.
2.4 Exercise of Options and
Stock Appreciation Rights
Subject
to the provisions of this Article II, each option or stock appreciation right
granted under the Plan shall be exercisable as follows:
2.4.1 Unless
the applicable plan agreement otherwise provides, an option or stock
appreciation right shall become exercisable in four substantially equal
installments, on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of
the date of grant, and each installment, once it becomes exercisable, shall
remain exercisable until expiration, cancellation or termination of the
award.
2.4.2 Unless
the applicable plan agreement otherwise provides, an option or stock
appreciation right may be exercised from time to time as to all or part of the
shares as to which such award is then exercisable (but, in any event, only for
whole shares). A stock appreciation right granted in connection with
an option may be exercised at any time when, and to the same extent that, the
related option may be exercised. An option or stock appreciation
right shall be exercised by the filing of a written notice with the Company, on
such form and in such manner as the Committee shall prescribe.
2.4.3 Any
written notice of exercise of an option shall be accompanied by payment for the
shares being purchased or such other document that the Committee may
prescribe. Such payment shall be made: (a) by certified or
official bank check (or the equivalent thereof acceptable to the Company) for
the full option exercise price; or (b) unless the applicable plan agreement
provides otherwise, by delivery of shares of Common Stock held for the requisite
period necessary to avoid a charge to the Company’s earnings for financial
accounting purposes and having a Fair Market Value (determined as of
the exercise date) equal to all or part of the option exercise price and a
certified or official bank check (or the equivalent thereof acceptable to the
Company) for any remaining portion of the full option exercise price; or (c) at
the discretion of the Committee and to the extent permitted by law, by such
other method as the Committee may from time to time prescribe.
2.4.4 Promptly
after receiving payment of the full option exercise price, or after receiving
notice of the exercise of a stock appreciation right for which payment will be
made partly or entirely in shares, the Company shall, subject to the provisions
of Section 3.3 (relating to certain restrictions), provide for the issuance of
the shares of Common Stock for which the award has been exercised. If
the method of payment employed upon option exercise so requires, and if
applicable law permits, an optionee may direct the Company to deliver the
certificate(s) to the optionee’s stockbroker.
2.5 Termination of Employment;
Death
2.5.1 Except
to the extent otherwise provided in Section 2.5.2 or 2.5.3 or in the applicable
plan agreement, all options and stock appreciation rights not theretofore
exercised shall terminate upon termination of the grantee’s employment for any
reason (including death).
2.5.2 Except
to the extent otherwise provided in the applicable plan agreement, if a
grantee’s employment terminates for any reason other than death or dismissal for
cause, the grantee may exercise any outstanding option or stock appreciation
right on the following terms and conditions: (a) exercise may be made
only to the extent that the grantee was entitled to exercise the award on the
date of employment termination; and (b) exercise must occur within three (3)
months after employment terminates, except that this three month
period shall be increased to one year if the termination is by reason of
disability, but in no event after the expiration date of the award as set forth
in the plan agreement. The term “disability” for purposes of the
preceding sentence shall have the meaning given to it by section 422(c)(6) of
the Code.
2.5.3 Except
to the extent otherwise provided in the applicable plan agreement, if a grantee
dies while employed by the Company or any subsidiary, or after employment
termination but during the period in which the grantee’s awards are exercisable
pursuant to Section 2.5.2, any outstanding option or stock appreciation right
shall be exercisable on the following terms and conditions: (a)
exercise may be made only to the extent that the grantee was entitled to
exercise the award on the date of death; and (b) exercise must occur by the
earlier of the first anniversary of the grantee’s death or the expiration date
of the award. Any such exercise of an award following a grantee’s
death shall be made only by the grantee’s executor or administrator, unless the
grantee’s will specifically disposes of such award, in which case such exercise
shall be made only by the recipient of such specific disposition. If
a grantee’s personal representative or the recipient of a specific disposition
under the grantee’s will shall be entitled to exercise any award pursuant to the
preceding sentence, such representative or recipient shall be bound by all the
terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable plan agreement which would
have applied to the grantee.
2.6 Grant of Restricted
Stock
2.6.1 The
Committee may grant restricted shares of Common Stock to such key persons, in
such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall
determine in its discretion, subject to the provisions of the
Plan. Restricted stock awards may be made independently of or in
connection with any other award under the Plan. A grantee of a
restricted stock award shall have no rights with respect to such award unless
such grantee accepts the award within such period as the Committee shall specify
by executing a plan agreement in such form as the Committee shall determine and,
if the Committee shall so require, makes payment to the Company by certified or
official bank check (or the equivalent thereof acceptable to the Company) in
such amount as the Committee may determine.
2.6.2 Promptly
after a grantee accepts a restricted stock award, the Company shall issue in the
grantee’s name a certificate or certificates for the shares of Common Stock
covered by the award. Upon the issuance of such certificate(s), the
grantee shall have the rights of a shareholder with respect to the restricted
stock, subject to the non-transferability restrictions and Company repurchase
rights described in Sections 2.6.4 and 2.6.5 and to such other restrictions and
conditions as the Committee in its discretion may include in the applicable plan
agreement.
2.6.3 Unless
the Committee shall otherwise determine, any certificate issued evidencing
shares of restricted stock shall remain in the possession of the Company until
such shares are free of any restrictions specified in the applicable plan
agreement.
2.6.4 Shares
of restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise
encumbered or disposed of except as specifically provided in this Plan or the
applicable plan agreement. The Committee at the time of grant shall
specify the date or dates (which may depend upon or be related to the attainment
of performance goals and other conditions) on which the non-transferability of
the restricted stock shall lapse. Unless the applicable plan
agreement provides otherwise, additional shares of Common Stock or other
property distributed to the grantee in respect of shares of restricted stock, as
dividends or otherwise, shall be subject to the same restrictions applicable to
such restricted stock.
2.6.5 Upon
the termination of the grantee’s employment for any reason while holding one or
more shares to which restrictions on transferability apply, then those shares
shall be immediately surrendered to the Company for cancellation and the grantee
shall have no further rights with respect to those shares. To the
extent the surrendered shares were issued for consideration paid in cash or cash
equivalent, the Company shall repay to the grantee (or the grantee’s estate) the
lesser of (a) the Fair Market Value of the shares on the date of such
termination of employment, or (b) any amount paid by the grantee for such
shares.
2.7 Grant of Restricted Stock
Units
2.7.1 The
Committee may grant awards of restricted stock units to such key persons, in
such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall
determine in its discretion, subject to the provisions of the
Plan. Restricted stock units may be awarded independently of or in
connection with any other award under the Plan.
2.7.2 At
the time of grant, the Committee shall specify the date or dates on which the
restricted stock units shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, and may
specify such conditions to vesting as it deems appropriate. In the
event of the termination of the grantee’s employment by the Company and its
subsidiaries for any reason, restricted stock units that have not become
nonforfeitable shall be forfeited and cancelled.
2.7.3 At
the time of grant, the Committee shall specify the date of issuance of the
shares subject to each grant of restricted stock units. Such date may
be the vesting date or dates of the award or any date following such vesting
date(s) consistent with the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the
Code. On the specified issuance date, the Company shall transfer to
the grantee one unrestricted, fully transferable share of Common Stock for each
vested restricted stock unit. The Committee shall specify the
purchase price, if any, to be paid by the grantee to the Company for such shares
of Common Stock.
2.8 Other Stock-Based
Awards
The
Committee may grant other types of stock-based awards (including the grant of
unrestricted shares) to such key persons, in such amounts and subject to such
terms and conditions, as the Committee shall in its discretion determine,
subject to the provisions of the Plan. Such awards may entail the
transfer of actual shares of Common Stock to Plan participants, or payment in
cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Common
Stock.
2.9 Grant of Dividend Equivalent
Rights
The
Committee may in its discretion include in the plan agreement with respect to
any award a dividend equivalent right entitling the grantee to receive amounts
equal to the ordinary dividends that would be paid, during the time such award
is outstanding and unexercised, on the shares of Common Stock covered by such
award if such shares were then outstanding. In the event such a
provision is included in a plan agreement, the Committee shall determine whether
such payments shall be made in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in another
form, whether they shall be conditioned upon the exercise of the award to which
they relate, the time or times at which they shall be made, and such other terms
and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate consistent with the
applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
2.10 Right of
Recapture
2.10.1 If
at any time within one year after the date on which a participant exercises an
option or stock appreciation right, or on which restricted stock vests, or which
is the maturity date of restricted stock units, or on which income is realized
by a participant in connection with any other stock-based award (each of which
events is a “realization event”), the participant (a) is terminated for cause or
(b) engages in any activity determined in the discretion of the Committee to be
in competition with any activity of the Company, or otherwise inimical, contrary
or harmful to the interests of the Company (including, but not limited to,
accepting employment with or serving as a consultant, adviser or in any other
capacity to an entity that is in competition with or acting against the
interests of the Company), then any gain realized by the participant from the
realization event shall be paid by the participant to the Company upon notice
from the Company. Such gain shall be determined as of the date of the
realization event, without regard to any subsequent change in the Fair Market
Value of a share of Common Stock. The Company shall have the right to
offset such gain against any amounts otherwise owed to the participant by the
Company (whether as wages, vacation pay, or pursuant to any benefit plan or
other compensatory arrangement).
ARTICLE
III
AUTOMATIC
GRANT PROGRAM FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
3.1 Automatic
Grants
Awards
shall be made automatically to non-employee Board members in accordance with the
provisions of this Article III.
3.2 Initial
Grants
3.2.1 On
Thursday, July 16, 2009, each individual who (i) was to be nominated for
re-election as a director at the regular 2009 Annual Stockholders Meeting and
(ii) had tendered for cancellation his or her outstanding equity awards pursuant
to the Company's Equity Award Exchange Offer was automatically granted an award
of restricted stock units with respect to 695,658 shares of Common Stock
(representing 0.125% of the fully diluted outstanding shares of the Company as
of the Plan Effective Date as determined by the Company, rounded up to the
nearest whole share). Each restricted stock unit shall entitle the
individual to receive one share of Common Stock following vesting of the
award.
3.2.2 Each
individual who is first elected or appointed as a non-employee Board member at
any time after the Plan Effective Date shall automatically be granted on the
date of such election or appointment, an award in the form of shares of Common
Stock. The number of shares subject to such award shall be equal to
the lower of (i) 0.125% of the fully diluted outstanding shares of the Company
as of the date of such election or appointment as determined by the Company
(rounded up to the nearest whole share) or (ii) the number of shares of Common
stock (adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of
Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend,
combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or
decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt
of consideration by the Company) subject to the award granted to a non-employee
Board member pursuant to section 3.2.1.
3.3 Annual
Grants
On
September 7, 2010 and on the date of each annual stockholders meeting, beginning
with the 2011 Annual Meeting, each individual who is at that time serving as,
and is to continue to serve as, a non-employee Board member shall automatically
be granted an award (the “Annual Award”) in the form of shares of Common Stock
and/or options with a value equal to the Applicable Annual
Amount. The Committee shall have the sole discretion to determine the
amount and type of award for each year within the foregoing
limitations. For such purposes, the value of the Annual Award shall
be calculated as follows: (A) the value of an option share shall be
equal to the fair value of an option share as estimated on the date of grant
under a valuation model approved by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) for purposes of the Company’s financial statements under FAS 123 (or
any successor provision); and (B) the value of a share subject to the stock
award shall be equal to the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on the
award date. The Applicable Annual Amount shall be determined by the
Committee on or before the date of the grant, but in no event shall exceed One
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).
3.4 Vesting of
Awards
Each
award granted to a non-employee Board member under Section 3.2.1 became fully
vested on the date (the “Vesting Date”) of approval of the Plan by the Company’s
shareholders provided the individual continued in Board service through the
Vesting Date. Each award granted under Sections 3.2.2 and 3.3 shall
be fully vested on the date of grant.
ARTICLE
IV
MISCELLANEOUS
4.1 Amendment of the Plan;
Modification of Awards
4.1.1 The
Board may from time to time suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the Plan in
any respect whatsoever, except that no such amendment shall materially impair
any rights or materially increase any obligations under any award theretofore
made under the Plan without the consent of the grantee (or, after the grantee’s
death, the person having the right to exercise the award). For
purposes of this Section 4.1, any action of the Board or the Committee that
alters or affects the tax treatment of any award shall not be considered to
materially impair any rights of any grantee.
4.1.2 Shareholder
approval of any amendment shall be obtained to the extent necessary to comply
with section 422 of the Code (relating to incentive stock options) or other
applicable law or regulation.
4.1.3 Except
as otherwise provided in Section 4.1.4 hereof, the Committee may amend any
outstanding plan agreement, including, without limitation, by amendment which
would accelerate the time or times at which the award becomes unrestricted or
may be exercised, or waive or amend any goals, restrictions or conditions set
forth in the agreement. However, any such amendment (other than an
amendment pursuant to Section 4.7.2, relating to change in control) that
materially impairs the rights or materially increases the obligations of a
grantee under an outstanding award shall be made only with the consent of the
grantee (or, upon the grantee’s death, the person having the right to exercise
the award).
4.1.4 The
Committee shall not (i) implement any cancellation/regrant program pursuant to
which outstanding options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan are
cancelled and new options or stock appreciation rights are granted in
replacement with a lower exercise price per share, (ii) cancel outstanding
options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan with exercise prices per
share in excess of the then current Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock
of the Corporation or (iii) otherwise directly reduce the exercise price in
effect for outstanding options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan,
without in each such instance obtaining shareholder approval.
4.2 Tax
Withholding
4.2.1 As
a condition to the receipt of any shares of Common Stock pursuant to any award
or the lifting of restrictions on any award, or in connection with any other
event that gives rise to a federal or other governmental tax withholding
obligation on the part of the Company relating to an award (including, without
limitation, FICA tax), the Company shall be entitled to require that the grantee
remit to the Company an amount sufficient in the opinion of the Company to
satisfy such withholding obligation.
4.2.2 The
Committee may, in its discretion, provide the grantee with the right to satisfy
the withholding obligation imposed under Section 4.2.1 by electing to have the
Company withhold shares with a Fair Market Value of an amount that does not
exceed the amount of the Company’s withholding obligations using the grantee’s
minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal (including, without
limitation, FICA tax) or other governmental tax liabilities.
4.3 Restrictions
4.3.1 If
the Committee shall at any time determine that any consent (as hereinafter
defined) is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the
granting of any award under the Plan, the issuance or purchase of shares or
other rights thereunder, or the taking of any other action thereunder (each such
action a “plan action”), then such plan action shall not be taken, in whole or
in part, unless and until such consent shall have been effected or obtained to
the full satisfaction of the Committee.
4.3.2 The
term “consent” as used herein with respect to any plan action means (a) any and
all listings, registrations or qualifications in respect thereof upon any
securities exchange or under any federal, state or local law, rule or
regulation, (b) any and all written agreements and representations by the
grantee with respect to the disposition of shares, or with respect to any other
matter, which the Committee shall deem necessary or desirable to comply with the
terms of any such listing, registration or qualification or to obtain an
exemption from the requirement that any such listing, qualification or
registration be made and (c) any and all consents, clearances and approvals in
respect of a plan action by any governmental or other regulatory
bodies.
4.4 Nonassignability
Except to
the extent otherwise provided in the applicable plan agreement, no award or
right granted to any person under the Plan shall be assignable or transferable
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and all such
awards and rights shall be exercisable during the life of the grantee only by
the grantee or the grantee’s legal representative.
4.5 Requirement of Notification
of Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code
If any
grantee shall, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Common Stock
under the Plan, make the election permitted under section 83(b) of the Code
(that is, an election to include in gross income in the year of transfer the
amounts specified in such section 83(b)), such grantee shall notify the Company
of such election as required pursuant to regulations issued under Code section
83(b), in addition to any filing and notification required pursuant to such
regulations.
4.6 Requirement of Notification
Upon Disqualifying Disposition Under Section 421(b) of the
Code
If any
grantee shall make any disposition of shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to
the exercise of an incentive stock option under the circumstances described in
section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions),
such grantee shall notify the Company of such disposition within 10 days
thereof.
4.7 Change in Control,
Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger
4.7.1 For
purposes of this Section 4.7, a “change in control” shall have occurred
if:
(a) any
“person”, as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the 1934 Act other
than (i) the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, (ii) any trustee or other
fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or
any subsidiary of the Company, or (iii) any company owned, directly or
indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same
proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), is or becomes the
“beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act), directly or
indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 50% of the
combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities without the
prior written consent of the Committee or the Board; or
(b) during
any period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months, individuals who at the
effective date of the Plan constitute the Board and any new director whose
election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company shareholders was
approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then still in office
who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or
nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to
constitute at least a majority thereof;
(c) the
shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company
with any other company (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company),
other than (i) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting
securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to
represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting
securities of the surviving entity) 50% or more of the combined voting power of
voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding
immediately after such merger or consolidation or (ii) a merger or
consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or
similar transaction) in which no “person” (as defined in Section 4.7.1(a) above
with the exceptions noted in section 4.7.1(a)) acquires more than 50% of the
combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities;
or
(d) the
shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the
Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or
substantially all of the Company’s assets (or any transaction having a similar
effect).
4.7.2 Upon
the happening of a change in control:
(a) subject
to the provisions of Section 2.5 above, in the event of a change in control, any
option or stock appreciation right or other award then outstanding shall
become fully vested and immediately exercisable upon such change in control
unless the applicable plan agreement expressly provides otherwise;
and
(b) to
the fullest extent permitted by law, the Committee may, in its sole discretion,
amend any plan agreement in such manner as it deems appropriate, including,
without limitation, by amendments that advance the dates upon which any or all
outstanding awards of any type shall terminate.
4.7.3 In
the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, all
outstanding awards will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such
proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Committee. The
Committee may, in the exercise of its sole discretion in such instances,
accelerate the date on which any award becomes exercisable or fully vested
and/or declare that any award shall terminate as of a specified
date.
4.8 Right of Discharge
Reserved
Nothing
in the Plan or in any plan agreement shall confer upon any grantee the right to
continue in the employ of the Company or any subsidiary or affect any right
which the Company or any subsidiary may have to terminate such
employment.
4.9 Nature of
Payments
4.9.1 Any
and all grants of awards and issuances of shares of Common Stock under the Plan
shall be in consideration of services performed for the Company by the
grantee.
4.9.2 All
such grants and issuances shall constitute a special incentive payment to the
grantee and shall not be taken into account in computing the amount of salary or
compensation of the grantee for the purpose of determining any benefits under
any pension, retirement, profit-sharing, bonus, life insurance or other benefit
plan of the Company or of any subsidiary or under any agreement with the
grantee, unless such plan or agreement specifically provides
otherwise.
4.10 Non-Uniform
Determinations
The
Committee’s determinations under the Plan need not be uniform and may be
made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive,
awards under the Plan (whether or not such persons are similarly
situated). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
Committee shall be entitled, among other things, to make non-uniform and
selective determinations, and to enter into non-uniform and selective Plan
agreements, as to (a) the persons to receive awards under the Plan, (b) the
terms and provisions of awards under the Plan and (c) the treatment of leaves of
absence pursuant to Section 1.6.4.
4.11 Other Payments or
Awards
Nothing
contained in the Plan shall be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the
Company from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan,
arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in
effect.
4.12 Section
Headings
The
section headings contained herein are for the purpose of convenience only and
are not intended to define or limit the contents of the sections.
4.13 Effective Date and Term of
Plan
4.13.1 The
Plan was adopted by the Board on July 9, 2009 (the “Plan Effective Date”), and
approved by the Company’s shareholders at the regular 2009 Annual Stockholders
Meeting.
4.13.2 Unless
sooner terminated by the Board, the Plan shall terminate on the day before the
tenth anniversary of the Plan Effective Date, and no awards shall thereafter be
made under the Plan. All awards made under the Plan prior to its
termination shall remain in effect until such awards have been satisfied or
terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan and the
applicable plan agreements.
4.14 Governing
Law
All
rights and obligations under the Plan shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to
principles of conflict of laws.