☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☐ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☒ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
☒ | No fee required. | |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |
1. | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
2. | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
3. | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined) | |
4. | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
5. | Total fee paid: | |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |
1. | Amount previously paid: | |
2. | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
3. | Filing party: | |
4. | Date Filed: |
• | Verifone Continues Its Multi-Year Transformation: We believe that Verifone’s transformation from primarily a hardware provider of traditional electronic payment terminals to a digital payments and services provider is our most critical mission. To effect this goal, under the leadership of our Chief Executive Officer, Paul Galant, our management team has embarked on a deep, company-wide restructuring. Our Board and management team have been highly focused on executing this strategic repositioning and have taken a number of decisive actions, including overhauling our business strategy, investing in additional gateway and estate management infrastructure, completing non-core divestitures, revamping our product development process, and introducing new products which began to launch in fiscal 2017, including successful launches of Engage, Carbon and mPOS solutions in new markets and segments. Turning to 2018, Verifone’s primary focus will shift from launching new products to scaling these products by deploying new devices, connecting Verifone’s gateways and estate management solutions to our services platform, and enabling our merchant acquirer and bank clients to serve their merchant customers with Verifone’s services platform. |
• | 2017 Annual Incentives Were Earned at 67% of Target and Reflected Challenging, Rigorous Goals: The Committee sets rigorous, objective financial and strategic performance goals at the beginning of each year. When establishing annual incentive targets, the Committee considers a variety of factors, including Verifone’s long-term transformational goals as described above, as well as broader market conditions that impact our business lines from year to year, to design a compensation program that incorporates challenging but achievable goals to appropriately incentivize performance and drive shareholder value. |
• | 2017 Long-Term Incentives Reflect Our Historical Balance of Performance and Service-Based Awards: Verifone has generally maintained a practice of granting approximately 50% of each NEO’s total equity awards in the form of performance-vested RSUs, with the remainder subject to time-vesting requirements. While in 2016 the Committee elected to grant our CEO 60% performance-vested RSUs and 40% time-vested RSUs, 2017 grants were made consistent with Verifone’s general practice of providing for approximately equal grants of time-vested awards and performance-vested awards. We believe that this balance of time-vested awards and performance-based awards encourages executive retention during a transformational period, ties a substantial amount of our executives’ overall compensation to our long-term performance, and promotes alignment between relative and absolute shareholder returns and executive payouts. |
• | Relative TSR is an Appropriate Performance Measure that Aligns Executive Payouts with Shareholder Returns: In connection with shareholder outreach we conducted during 2017, we determined that, while stockholders had a range of opinions about metrics for our performance-based equity awards, a significant number of stockholders supported the alignment between stockholders returns and executive compensation created by performance-based equity awards that vest based on relative TSR performance. This rigorous pay-for-performance alignment is demonstrated by the payouts of performance-based equity awards granted during previous pay periods: the initial 2013 grant of “new-hire” performance-based equity awards to our CEO resulted in no shares being earned at the end of the performance period in 2016, and the performance-based shares granted to our NEOs in January 2015 resulted in no shares being earned at the completion of the three-year performance period in January 2018. Similarly, based on our relative TSR performance through October 31, 2017, no portion of the performance-based equity awards granted to our NEOs in January 2016 would have been earned based on performance through that date. |
• | Our Compensation Program Is a Product of Our Continued Robust Stockholder Engagement Efforts: We have demonstrated responsiveness to stockholder feedback by removing discretionary adjustments to short-term incentive award payouts, and capping payouts of performance-based restricted stock units in the event of negative absolute TSR, among other measures. We believe that the fact that over 92% of votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal at our 2017 Annual Meeting supported such proposal is evidence of the success of these prior outreach efforts and is a reflection of our commitment to aligning pay with performance in a way that benefits our stockholders. |
Sincerely, |
Alex W. (Pete) Hart |
Chairman of the Board of Directors |