DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed by the
Registrant þ |
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
|
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other
underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the |
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the |
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount previously paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
500 Glenpointe Centre West
Teaneck, New Jersey 07666
May 5, 2005
To Our Stockholders:
You are most cordially invited to attend the 2005 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation at
10:00 a.m. local time, on Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at
our headquarters, 500 Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New
Jersey 07666.
The Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement on the following pages
describe the matters to be presented at the meeting.
It is important that your shares be represented at this meeting
to ensure the presence of a quorum. Whether or not you plan to
attend the meeting, we hope that you will have your shares
represented by signing, dating and returning your proxy in the
enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the
United States, as soon as possible. Your shares will be
voted in accordance with the instructions you have given in your
proxy.
Thank you for your continued support.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
Lakshmi Narayanan |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
500 Glenpointe Centre West
Teaneck, New Jersey 07666
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held Tuesday, June 14, 2005
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Meeting) of
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, will be held at our headquarters, 500 Glenpointe
Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey on Tuesday, June 14, 2005,
at 10:00 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
(1) To elect two (2) Class II Directors to serve
until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until their
respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified; |
|
|
(2) To amend our 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, as
amended (the Incentive Plan), to (i) increase
the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock
reserved for issuance from 36,000,000 to 37,500,000 shares
and to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock for issuance upon the exercise of
stock options or stock appreciation rights or for the issuance
of other awards granted under the Incentive Plan,
(ii) provide that repricing of stock options may not occur
without stockholder approval, (iii) provide for minimum
vesting periods for stock based awards, other than stock options
or stock appreciation rights, (iv) provide that stock
options may not be granted below fair market value, and
(v) provide that all material amendments to the Incentive
Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval; |
|
|
(3) To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2005; and |
|
|
(4) To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. |
Holders of record of our Class A Common Stock as of the
close of business on April 18, 2005 are entitled to notice
of and to vote at the Meeting, or any adjournment or
adjournments thereof. A complete list of such stockholders will
be open to the examination of any stockholder at our principal
executive offices at 500 Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New
Jersey 07666 for a period of ten days prior to the Meeting and
on the day of the Meeting. The Meeting may be adjourned from
time to time without notice other than by announcement at the
Meeting.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED REGARDLESS OF
THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU MAY HOLD. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO
ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN
ENVELOPE. THE PROMPT RETURN OF PROXIES WILL ENSURE A QUORUM AND
SAVE US THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER SOLICITATION. EACH PROXY GRANTED
MAY BE REVOKED BY THE STOCKHOLDER APPOINTING SUCH PROXY AT ANY
TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED. IF YOU RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE PROXY CARD
BECAUSE YOUR SHARES ARE REGISTERED IN DIFFERENT NAMES OR
ADDRESSES, EACH SUCH PROXY CARD
SHOULD BE SIGNED AND RETURNED TO ASSURE THAT ALL OF YOUR
SHARES WILL BE VOTED.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon J. Coburn |
|
Secretary |
Teaneck, New Jersey
May 5, 2005
Our 2004 Annual Report accompanies the Proxy Statement.
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
500 Glenpointe Centre West
Teaneck, New Jersey 07666
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology
Solutions Corporation of proxies to be voted at our Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, June 14,
2005 (the Meeting), at our headquarters, 500
Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey at 10:00 a.m.
local time, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
Holders of record of shares of Class A Common Stock,
$0.01 par value (Class A Common Stock), as
of the close of business on April 18, 2005, will be
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and any
adjournment or adjournments thereof. As of that date, there were
135,393,554 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of Class A
Common Stock is entitled to one vote on any matter presented to
stockholders at the Meeting.
In this Proxy Statement, Cognizant,
Company, we, us, and
our refer to Cognizant Technology Solutions
Corporation.
If proxies in the accompanying form are properly executed and
returned, the shares of Class A Common Stock represented
thereby will be voted in the manner specified therein. If not
otherwise specified, the shares of Class A Common Stock
represented by the proxies will be voted (i) FOR the
election of the two (2) Class II Director nominees;
(ii) FOR the proposal to amend our 1999 Incentive
Compensation Plan, as amended (the Incentive Plan),
to (A) increase the maximum number of shares of
Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance from 36,000,000
to 37,500,000 shares and to reserve an additional
1,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for issuance
upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights
or for the issuance of other awards granted under the Incentive
Plan, (B) provide that repricing of stock options may not
occur without stockholder approval, (C) provide for minimum
vesting periods for stock based awards, other than stock options
or stock appreciation rights, (D) provide that stock
options may not be granted below fair market and
(E) provide that all material amendments to the Incentive
Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval; (iii) FOR
the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2005; and (iv) in the
discretion of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy,
on any other proposals which may properly come before the
Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Any
stockholder who has submitted a proxy may revoke it at any time
before it is voted, by written notice addressed to and received
by our Secretary, by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a
later date or by electing to vote in person at the Meeting. The
mere presence at the Meeting of the person appointing a proxy
does not, however, revoke the appointment.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of the shares of
Class A Common Stock having, in the aggregate, a majority
of the votes entitled to be cast at the Meeting shall constitute
a quorum. The affirmative vote by the holders of a plurality of
the shares of Class A Common Stock represented at the
Meeting, is required for the election of Directors, provided a
quorum is present in person or by proxy. All actions proposed
herein other than the election of Directors may be taken upon
the affirmative vote of stockholders possessing a majority of
the shares of Class A Common Stock present or represented
at the Meeting and entitled to vote, provided a quorum is
present in person or by proxy.
Abstentions are included in the shares present at the Meeting
for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, and are
counted as a vote against for purposes of determining whether a
proposal is approved. Broker non-votes (when shares are
represented at the Meeting by a proxy conferring only limited
authority to vote on certain matters and no authority to vote on
other matters) are included in the
determination of the number of shares represented at the Meeting
for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but are
not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal has
been approved and thus have no effect on the outcome.
This Proxy Statement, together with the related proxy card and
our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended
December 31, 2004, including financial statements (the
Annual Report), is being mailed to all stockholders
of record as of April 18, 2005. The mailing date will be on
or about May 5, 2005. In addition, we have provided
brokers, dealers, banks, voting trustees and their nominees, at
our expense, with additional copies of the Annual Report so that
such record holders could supply such materials to beneficial
owners as of April 18, 2005.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At this Meeting, two (2) Class II Directors are to be
elected to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held in 2008, or until their successors shall have been
elected and qualified.
We currently have six Directors. As set forth in our Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, the terms of office of the members
of the Board of Directors are divided into three classes:
Class I, whose term will expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders; Class II, whose term will expire at the
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and Class III, whose
term will expire at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The
current Class I Directors are Lakshmi Narayanan and John E.
Klein, the current Class II Directors are Robert W. Howe
and Robert E. Weissman and the current Class III Directors
are Venetia Kontogouris and Thomas M. Wendel. At each Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, the successors to Directors whose terms
then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election
and qualification until the third annual meeting following
election. If the number of Directors is changed, any increase or
decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to
maintain the number of Directors in each class as nearly equal
as possible, and any additional Director of any class elected to
fill a newly created directorship resulting from an increase in
such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with
the remaining term of that class, but in no case shall a
decrease in the number of Directors remove or shorten the term
of any incumbent Director. This classification of our Board of
Directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes
in control or management of Cognizant.
All Directors hold office until the expiration of their
respective term and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. There are no family relationships among any of our
executive officers, Directors and key employees.
It is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of
proxy to vote the shares of Class A Common Stock
represented thereby, unless otherwise specified in the proxy,
for the election as Directors of the persons whose names and
biographies appear below. All of the persons whose names and
biographies appear below are at present our Directors. In the
event any of the nominees should become unavailable or unable to
serve as a Director, it is intended that votes will be cast for
a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors. The
Board of Directors has no reason to believe that the nominees
named will be unable to serve if elected. Each of the nominees
has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to
serve if elected.
NOMINEES FOR CLASS II DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE
2008 ANNUAL MEETING)
The current members of the Board of Directors who are also
nominees for election to the Board as Class II Directors
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as a | |
|
Positions with | |
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Director Since | |
|
Cognizant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Robert W. Howe
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
Robert E. Weissman
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
2
The principal occupations and business experience, for at least
the past five years, of each Class II Director are as
follows:
Robert W. Howe was elected to the Board of Directors in
April 1999. Mr. Howe currently serves as Chairman of the
Board of Directors of ADS Financial Services Solutions
(ADS), a provider of information technology services
to the financial services industry. He has held such position
since January 1994. From January 1994 to December 2003,
Mr. Howe served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
ADS and from March 1980 to January 1994, Mr. Howe served as
its President. Mr. Howe serves on the board of directors of
several private companies. Mr. Howe holds a Bachelor of
Arts degree from Boston College.
Robert E. Weissman was elected to the Board of Directors
in May 2001. Mr. Weissman retired in January 2001 after
nearly thirty years serving as Chief Executive Officer for
several public corporations. Most recently, Mr. Weissman
was Chairman of the Board of Directors of IMS Health, a provider
of information to the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.
He served as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IMS
Health until March of 1999. Prior to his position with IMS
Health, Mr. Weissman was Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Cognizant Corporation and prior to that, was Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of The Dun & Bradstreet
Corporation. Prior to his election as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Dun & Bradstreet, he held the
position of President and Chief Operating Officer of that
company since 1985. Mr. Weissman joined Dun &
Bradstreet in May 1979, when D&B acquired National CSS, a
computer time-sharing company, of which he was President and
Chief Executive Officer. Since his retirement, Mr. Weissman
has been active as Chairman of Shelburne Partners, a private
investment company that works with emerging companies in the
United States and Europe. Mr. Weissman is a director of
State Street Corporation and Pitney Bowes, Inc. and a member of
the Advisory Board for Broadview Capital, a venture capital
firm. Mr. Weissman graduated from Babson College in 1964.
He serves on Babsons Board of Trustees, and received an
honorary Doctor of Laws degree from Babson in 1995.
|
|
|
Continuing Members of the Board of Directors |
CLASS III DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE 2006 ANNUAL
MEETING)
The current members of the Board of Directors who are
Class III Directors are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as a | |
|
Positions with | |
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Director Since | |
|
Cognizant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Venetia Kontogouris
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
Thomas M. Wendel
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
Director |
|
The principal occupations and business experience, for at least
the past five years, of each Class III Director are as
follows:
Venetia Kontogouris was elected to our Board of Directors
in December 1997. Ms. Kontogouris is currently Managing
Director of Trident Capital, a venture capital firm. Prior to
joining Trident Capital in March 1999, Ms. Kontogouris was
President of Enterprise Associates, Inc., a subsidiary of IMS
Health from 1989 to 1999. Prior to joining Enterprise
Associates, Inc., Ms. Kontogouris was Vice President of New
Product Development for The Dun & Bradstreet
Corporation from 1985 to 1989. Before working at The
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, Ms. Kontogouris held
various sales and marketing positions at IBM and AT&T.
Ms. Kontogouris serves on the board of directors of several
private companies. Ms. Kontogouris holds a Bachelor of Arts
degree from Northeastern University and a Master of Business
Administration degree and a Master in International Relations
degree from the University of Chicago.
Thomas M. Wendel was elected to the Board of Directors in
June 2001. In July 2000, Mr. Wendel retired as the Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge
Information Systems, a global financial information, transaction
services, and network services company. Prior to joining Bridge
in 1995, Mr. Wendel was founding President and Chief
Executive Officer of Liberty Brokerage Inc., a major US
government securities brokerage firm. Mr. Wendel previously
served in various positions at Paine Webber, Inc., including
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Managing
Director. Prior to joining Paine Webber in 1982, Mr. Wendel
was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pan
American
3
World Airways. Mr. Wendel holds a Bachelor of Science
degree in Mathematics from Ursinus College, a Master of Arts in
Economics from San Jose State College, and a Master in
Business Administration from the University of Santa Clara.
CLASS I DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE 2007 ANNUAL
MEETING)
The current members of the Board of Directors who are
Class I Directors are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as a | |
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Director Since | |
|
Positions with Cognizant |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Lakshmi Narayanan
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
John E. Klein
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director |
The principal occupations and business experience, for at least
the past five years, of each nominee are as follows:
Lakshmi Narayanan was elected Chief Executive Officer in
December 2003. Mr. Narayanan has served as our President
since March 1998. Mr. Narayanan joined our Indian
subsidiary as Chief Technology Officer in 1994 and was elected
President of such subsidiary on January 1, 1996. Prior to
joining us, from 1975 to 1994, Mr. Narayanan was the
regional head of Tata Consultancy Services, a large consulting
and software services company located in India.
Mr. Narayanan holds a Bachelor of Science degree, a Master
of Science degree and a Management degree from the Indian
Institute of Science.
John E. Klein was elected to the Board of Directors in
March 1998 and elected to serve as our Chairman of the Board in
December 2003. Mr. Klein currently serves as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Polarex, Inc., an organization
providing executive support to software and services companies,
where he has been employed since 1994. Prior to that,
Mr. Klein held various positions at various companies,
including MDIS Group PLC a UK listed software and services
company. In addition, Mr. Klein also served as Chairman of
Glovia International and PRO IV Limited, two enterprise software
and services companies. Prior to 1995, Mr. Klein was a Vice
President for both Digital Equipment and IBM. Mr. Klein
also serves as a director of privately-held Questra Corporation,
an enterprise software company and Arxan Technologies, Inc., a
software and hardware solutions company. Mr. Klein holds a
Bachelor of Science degree from the U.S. Merchant Marine
Academy and a Master of Business Administration degree from New
York University.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
General
We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure
that we are managed for the long-term benefit of our
stockholders. Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate
Governance Guidelines, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
charters for our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. You can access our
current committee charters and Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics in the About Us section of our Web site
located at www.cognizant.com or by writing to our
Secretary at our offices at 500 Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck,
New Jersey 07666.
Determination of Independence
Under NASDAQ rules, a Director will only qualify as an
independent director if, in the opinion of our Board
of Directors, that person does not have a relationship which
would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in
carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. Our Board of
Directors has determined that none of Robert Howe, Thomas
Wendel, John Klein, Venetia Kontogouris or Robert Weissman has a
relationship which would interfere with the exercise of
independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
Director and that each of these Directors is an
independent director as defined under
Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
Marketplace Rules.
4
Director Candidates
The process to be followed by the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director
candidates shall include requests to Board members and others
for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate
biographical information and background material relating to
potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by
members of the Committee and the Board.
In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for
inclusion in the Boards slate of recommended Director
nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
apply the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance
Guidelines. These criteria include the candidates
integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and
industry, experience, diligence, conflicts of interest and the
ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The
Committee does not assign specific weights to particular
criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each
prospective nominee. We believe that the backgrounds and
qualifications of our Directors, considered as a group, should
provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities
that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.
Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee for consideration as potential
Director candidates by submitting their names, together with
appropriate biographical information and background materials
and a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of
stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned
more than 5% of Class A Common Stock for at least a year as
of the date such recommendation is made, to Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary,
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, 500 Glenpointe
Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey 07666. Assuming that
appropriate biographical and background material has been
provided on a timely basis, the Committee will evaluate
stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially
the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria,
as it follows for candidates submitted by others.
Communications from Stockholders
The Board will give appropriate attention to written
communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will
respond if and as appropriate. Our Secretary and Chairman of the
Board, with the assistance of our General Counsel, are primarily
responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and
for providing copies or summaries to the other directors as they
consider appropriate.
Under procedures approved by a majority of the independent
Directors, communications are forwarded to all Directors if they
relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions
or comments that our Secretary and Chairman of the Board
consider to be important for the Directors to know. In general,
communications relating to corporate governance and long-term
corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than
communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal
grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive
or duplicative communications.
Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the
Board should address such communications to the Board of
Directors by emailing the Board of Directors at the following
email address: corporategovernance@cognizant.com; or in writing:
c/o Corporate Secretary, Cognizant Technology Solutions
Corporation, 500 Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey
07666.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
that applies to our Directors, officers and employees, including
our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions. We have posted the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics on our Web site, which is located at
www.cognizant.com. In addition, we intend to post on our
Web site all disclosures that are required by law or NASDAQ
stock market listing standards concerning any amendments to, or
waivers from, any provision of our Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics.
5
Attendance by Members of the Board of Directors at
Meetings
There were six meetings of the Board of Directors during 2004.
Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all
meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period in
which he or she served as a Director and the total number of
meetings held by the committee on which he or she served during
the period, if applicable.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors are
expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders.
Mr. Narayanan attended the 2004 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders in person and each of the other Directors
participated in the meeting by teleconference.
Committees of the Board
The Board of Directors has established three standing
committees Audit Committee, Compensation Committee
and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by
our Board of Directors. Current copies of each committees
charter are posted on the About Us section of our
Web site www.cognizant.com. In addition, a copy of the
Audit Committee charter, as in effect on the date of this proxy
statement, is attached hereto as Appendix A.
The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of
each of the Boards three standing committees are
independent as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock
Market, including, in the case of all members of the Audit
Committee, the independence requirements contemplated by
Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
addition, all of the members of the Audit Committee are
independent as defined by the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Our Audit Committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm; |
|
|
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration
of certain reports from the independent registered public
accounting firm; |
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures; |
|
|
|
monitoring our internal control over financial reporting,
disclosure controls and procedures and code of business conduct
and ethics; |
|
|
|
discussing and assessing our risk management policies; |
|
|
|
establishing policies regarding hiring employees from the
independent registered public accounting firm and procedures for
the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and
concerns; |
|
|
|
meeting independently with our independent registered public
accounting firm and management; and |
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules
(which is included on page 8 of this proxy statement). |
Pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee has
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2004 with our management and
independent registered public accounting firm. Additionally, the
Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered
public accounting firm the matters required by Statement of
Auditing Standards (SAS) 61, has received the
written disclosures and the letter from the independent
registered public accounting firm required by the Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 and has discussed with the
independent registered public accounting firm the independent
registered public accounting firms independence. Based in
part on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the financial statements as of
6
and for the year ended December 31, 2004 audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP be included in our Annual Report on
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
Form 10-K.
The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Howe, Klein
and Wendel. During 2004, Messrs. Howe, Klein and Wendel
were the only members of the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee was established in 1998 and met seven times during
2004. It is anticipated that Mr. Howe, if elected to the
Board of Directors by our stockholders, will continue to serve
on the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has determined
that Mr. Wendel is an audit committee financial
expert as defined in Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K.
Our Compensation Committee, which is comprised of
Messrs. Howe, Klein and Weissman, is responsible for the
administration of all salary and incentive compensation plans
for our officers and key employees, including bonuses. In
addition, our Compensation Committee has the following principal
duties:
|
|
|
|
|
annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives
relevant to CEO compensation; |
|
|
|
determining the CEOs compensation; |
|
|
|
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board
with respect to, the compensation of our other executive
officers; |
|
|
|
overseeing an evaluation of our senior executives; |
|
|
|
overseeing and administering our cash and equity incentive
plans; and |
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect
to Director compensation. |
The Compensation Committee also administers our stock option
plans, including the Incentive Plan, and establishes the terms
and conditions of all stock options granted thereunder. The
Compensation Committee also administers our 2004 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. The Compensation Committee met once during 2004.
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
In March 2004, our Board of Directors established a Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee. Its responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members; |
|
|
|
recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated for
election as directors and to each of the Boards committees; |
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect
to management succession planning; |
|
|
|
developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance
principles; and |
|
|
|
overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board. |
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
are Messrs. Howe, Klein, Wendel and Weissman and
Ms. Kontogouris. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee met once during 2004.
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
The Audit Committee has furnished the following report:
To the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions
Corporation:
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is currently
composed of three members and acts under a written charter first
adopted and approved on May 17, 2000. Our current Audit
Committee charter is
7
attached hereto as Appendix A. The members of the Audit
Committee are independent Directors, as defined in its charter
and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Audit Committee
held seven meetings during 2004.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the
Companys financial statements and for maintaining an
adequate system of disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. Our
independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for
conducting an independent audit of our annual financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and issuing a report on the results of its audit. The
Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent,
objective oversight of these processes.
The Audit Committee has reviewed the Companys audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 and has discussed these financial statements with
management and our independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee has also received from, and discussed
with, our independent registered public accounting firm various
communications that our independent registered public accounting
firm is required to provide to the Audit Committee, including
the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards 61, 89 and 90 (Communication with Audit Committees).
SAS 61 requires our independent registered public accounting
firm to discuss with the Audit Committee, among other things,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
methods used to account for significant unusual transactions; |
|
|
|
the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial
or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative
guidance or consensus; |
|
|
|
the process used by management in formulating particularly
sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the conclusions
of our registered public accounting firm regarding the
reasonableness of those estimates; and |
|
|
|
disagreements with management over the application of accounting
principles, the basis for managements accounting estimates
and the disclosures in the financial statements. |
Our independent registered public accounting firm also provided
the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1
(Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1 requires auditors annually
to disclose in writing all relationships that, in the
auditors professional opinion, may reasonably be thought
to bear on independence, confirm their perceived independence
and engage in a discussion of independence. In addition, the
Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm its independence from Cognizant. The Audit
Committee also considered whether the independent registered
public accounting firms provision of certain other
non-audit related services to us is compatible with maintaining
such firms independence.
Based on its discussions with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm, and its review of the
representations and information provided by management and the
independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit
Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
By the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Cognizant
Technology Solutions Corporation |
|
|
Robert W. Howe |
|
John E. Klein |
|
Thomas M. Wendel |
8
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Other
Matters
The following table summarizes the fees of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm, billed to us for each of the last two fiscal
years for audit services and billed to us in each of the last
two fiscal years for other services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Category |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
1,755,900 |
|
|
$ |
565,500 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
312,500 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
303,200 |
|
|
|
145,500 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
2,087,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,023,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2004, $1,454,700 of the total fees was billed as of
December 31, 2004. For 2003, $866,600 of the total fees
billed was billed as of December 31, 2003.
Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our financial
statements and managements report on internal controls
under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the review of
the interim financial statements included in our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, services rendered in connection with
SEC registration statements and other professional services
provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements.
Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit and the review of our financial statements and which are
not reported under Audit Fees. These services relate
to employee benefit audits, due diligence related to
acquisitions, accounting consultations and audits in connection
with acquisitions, attest services that are not required by
statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial
accounting and reporting standards.
Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning services. Tax compliance services, which relate to
preparation of original tax returns and VAT registrations,
accounted for $82,500 of the total tax fees paid for 2004 and
$25,700 of the total tax fees paid for 2003. Tax advice and tax
planning services relate to preparation of transfer pricing
studies and consultations on various domestic and international
tax matters.
There were no fees to report in this category for 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures |
The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating
to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to
be performed by our independent registered public accounting
firm. This policy generally provides that we will not engage our
independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or
non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved
in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement is entered
into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures described
below.
From time to time, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specified
types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our
independent registered public accounting firm during the next
12 months. Any such pre-approval is detailed as to the
particular service or type of services to be provided and is
also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount.
9
The Audit Committee has also delegated to Thomas M. Wendel the
authority to approve any audit or non-audit services to be
provided to us by our independent registered public accounting
firm. Any approval of services by a member of the Audit
Committee pursuant to this delegated authority is reported on at
the next meeting of the Audit Committee. During 2004, no
services were provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or
any other accounting firm other than in accordance with the
pre-approval policies and procedures described above.
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are our employees or employees of our subsidiaries
receive no cash remuneration for serving as Directors. All
non-employee Directors, other than our Chairman, receive an
annual retainer of $20,000 for attendance at meetings of the
Board of Directors (no additional fees are paid for attendance
at non-committee meetings of the Board of Directors) and $1,500
for attendance at each meeting of a committee of the Board of
Directors or $2,000 for attendance at each meeting of a
committee of the Board of Directors if serving as the
chairperson of such committee meeting. Our Chairman receives an
annual retainer of $70,000. All Directors who are not our
employees or employees of our subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in our Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan (the Director Plan) and the Incentive Plan.
The Director Plan became effective in December 1997 and was
amended in March 1998. As of March 31, 2005, the maximum
aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock reserved
for issuance under the Director Plan was 858,000 shares, of
which 14,000 shares remained available for future grant.
The Director Plan, which is administered by the Compensation
Committee, provides for the issuance of non-qualified stock
options to purchase up to 180,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock in any year to any of our Directors who is not our
employee or an employee of one of our subsidiaries. Subject to
the provisions of the Director Plan, the Compensation Committee
has the authority to interpret the provisions of the Director
Plan, and to determine the persons to whom options will be
granted, the number of shares to be covered by each option and
the terms and conditions upon which an option may be granted.
The option price for options granted under the Director Plan
shall be determined by the Compensation Committee and may be
granted at an exercise price greater than, less than or equal to
the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of
grant. Options granted under the Director Plan become
exercisable as to 50% on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of initial grant. Options granted
under the Director Plan expire after 10 years, are
nontransferable and, with certain exceptions in the event of a
death of a participant, may be exercised by the optionee only
during service. In the event of an optionees death or
disability, the unexercised portion of an option immediately
vests in full and may be exercised until (i) the earlier of
the remaining stated term of the option or five years after the
date of death with respect to a termination due to death or
(ii) the earlier of the remaining stated term of the option
and the longer of five years after the date of termination due
to disability or one year after the date of death, in the case
of a termination due to disability. In the case of a termination
for any other reason, the unexercised portion of an option may
be exercised for the period ending ninety days after
termination, but only to the extent such option was exercisable
at the time of termination.
The Incentive Plan became effective in May 1999. As of
March 31, 2005, the maximum aggregate number of shares of
Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance under the
Incentive Plan was 36,000,000, of which 1,375,260 shares
remained available for future grant. The purpose of the
Incentive Plan is to (i) aid us in motivating certain
employees, non-employee Directors and independent contractors to
put forth maximum efforts toward the our growth, profitability
and success; and (ii) provide incentives which will attract
and retain highly qualified individuals as employees and
non-employee Directors and to assist in aligning the interests
of such employees and non-employee Directors with those of our
stockholders. Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, awards may be
stock-based or payable in cash. Subject to adjustment, for among
other things, a merger, consolidation, reorganization, stock
split, or other change in capital structure, an individual is
limited to a maximum of 9,000,000 shares during the life of
the Incentive Plan. Additionally, the maximum dollar amount paid
in cash to any individual during the life of the Incentive Plan
is $10,000,000. The Incentive Plan terminates on April 13,
2009, unless sooner terminated by the Board of Directors. The
Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee.
Subject to the provisions of the Incentive Plan, the
Compensation Committee has the authority, among other things, to
determine eligibility for
10
participation, determine eligibility for and the type and size
of awards, issue administrative guidelines and make rules as an
aid to administer the Incentive Plan, grant waivers of terms,
conditions, restrictions and limitations and accelerate the
vesting of any award. Several types of awards are provided for
by the Incentive Plan. The awards may be measured in stock or in
cash. An award may be designated as a stock option, stock
appreciation right, stock award, stock unit, performance share,
performance unit or cash. Generally, all awards under the
Incentive Plan are nontransferable except by will or in
accordance with the laws of descent and distribution. Stock
options and stock appreciation rights are exercisable only by
the grantee during his or her lifetime. The Compensation
Committee, in its discretion, may permit the transferability of
a stock option (other than an incentive stock option) by a
grantee to members of his or her immediate family or trusts or
other similar entities for the benefit of such person. Upon the
occurrence of a change in control of us, as defined in the
Incentive Plan, with certain exceptions, the Compensation
Committee has the discretion to, among other things, accelerate
the vesting and payout of outstanding awards or provide that an
award be assumed by the entity which acquires control of us or
be substituted by a similar award under such entitys
compensation plan.
During 2004, the following Directors were granted options to
purchase shares of Class A Common Stock under the Director
Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying | |
|
|
|
Exercise Price | |
Director |
|
Options Granted(1) | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
per Share(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Robert W. Howe
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4/8/04 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
John E. Klein
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4/8/04 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
Venetia Kontogouris
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4/8/04 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
Robert E. Weissman
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4/8/04 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
Thomas M. Wendel
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4/8/04 |
|
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Such numbers have been adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock
split that occurred on June 17, 2004. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), requires our Directors,
Executive Officers and Stockholders who beneficially own more
than 10% of any class of our equity securities registered
pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (collectively,
the Reporting Persons) to file initial statements of
beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in
beneficial ownership of securities with respect to our equity
securities with the SEC. All Reporting Persons are required by
SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all reports that
such Reporting Persons file with the SEC pursuant to
Section 16(a). Except as set forth below, based solely on
our review of the copies of such forms received by us and upon
written representations of the Reporting Persons received by us,
we believe that there has been compliance with all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such
Reporting Persons. Mr. Chandrasekaran did not timely file a
Form 4 with respect to a grant of stock options on
March 4, 2004. This transaction was reported on a
Form 4 dated June 16, 2004.
11
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table identifies our current executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacities in |
|
In Current | |
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Which Served |
|
Position Since | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Lakshmi Narayanan(1)
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
Francisco DSouza(2)
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
Gordon J. Coburn(3)
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary |
|
|
2003 |
|
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran(4)
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Vice President & Managing Director |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Lakshmi Narayanan was elected Chief Executive Officer in
December 2003. Mr. Narayanan has served as our President
since March 1998. Mr. Narayanan joined our Indian
subsidiary as Chief Technology Officer in 1994 and was elected
President of such subsidiary on January 1, 1996. Prior to
joining us, from 1975 to 1994, Mr. Narayanan was the
regional head of Tata Consultancy Services, a large consulting
and software services company located in India.
Mr. Narayanan holds a Bachelor of Science degree, a Master
of Science degree and a Management degree from the Indian
Institute of Science. |
|
(2) |
Francisco DSouza was elected Chief Operating Officer in
December 2003. Prior to that, from November 1999 to December
2003, he served as our Senior Vice President, North American
Operations and Business Development. From March 1998 to November
1999, he served as our Vice President, North American Operations
and Business Development and as our Director-North American
Operations and Business Development from June 1997 to March
1998. From January 1996 to June 1997, Mr. DSouza was
engaged as our consultant. From February 1995 to December 1995,
Mr. DSouza was employed as Product Manager at Pilot
Software. Between 1992 and 1995, Mr. DSouza held
various marketing, business development and technology
management positions as a Management Associate at The
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. While working at The
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, Mr. DSouza was
part of the team that established the software development and
maintenance business conducted by us. Mr. DSouza
holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the
University of East Asia and a Master of Business Administration
degree from Carnegie-Mellon University. |
|
(3) |
Gordon J. Coburn was elected Executive Vice President in
December 2003. Mr. Coburn continues to serve as our Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, positions he has
held since March 1998. From November 1999 to December 2003, he
served as our Senior Vice President. He previously was our Vice
President from 1996 to November 1999. Mr. Coburn served as
Senior Director Group Finance & Operations
for Cognizant Corporation from November 1996 to December 1997.
From 1990 to October 1996, Mr. Coburn held key financial
positions with The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.
Mr. Coburn holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Wesleyan
University and a Master of Business Administration degree from
the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College. |
|
(4) |
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran was elected Executive Vice President
and Managing Director in January 2004. Prior to that, from
November 1999 to January 2004, he served as our Senior Vice
President responsible for the independent software vendor
relationships, key alliances, capacity growth, process
initiatives, business development and offshore delivery.
Mr. Chandrasekaran joined us as Assistant Vice President in
December 1994, before getting promoted to Vice President in
January 1997. Mr. Chandrasekaran has more than
20 years of experience working in the IT services industry.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Chandrasekaran worked with Tata
Consultancy Services. Mr. Chandrasekaran holds a Mechanical
Engineering degree and Master of Business Administration degree
from the Indian Institute of Management. |
None of our executive officers is related to any other executive
officer or to any of our Directors. Our executive officers are
elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve until their
successors are duly elected and qualified.
12
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Compensation in 2002, 2003 and 2004
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth information
concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities
to us and our subsidiaries for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 which was awarded to, earned by or paid to
each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer at any
time during 2004 and each other of our executive officers whose
aggregate cash compensation for the 2004 fiscal year exceeded
$100,000 (collectively, the Named Executives) No
other individual who would have been included in such table by
reason of salary and bonus for the 2004 fiscal year terminated
employment or otherwise ceased executive officer status during
that year. All share numbers have been adjusted to reflect a
two-for-one stock split that occurred on June 17, 2004.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus(2) | |
|
Compensation(3) | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation | |
(a) |
|
(b) | |
|
($)(c) | |
|
($)(d) | |
|
($)(e) | |
|
(#)(g) | |
|
($)(i) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lakshmi Narayanan(1)(4)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
195,253 |
|
|
|
261,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,747 |
(5) |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
135,696 |
|
|
|
182,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
115,720 |
|
|
|
155,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,102 |
(5) |
Francisco DSouza(1)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
391,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500 |
(6) |
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
264,500 |
|
|
|
317,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
220,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
(6) |
Gordon J. Coburn(1)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
352,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,752 |
(7) |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
237,507 |
|
|
|
283,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
49,249 |
(8) |
|
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
205,700 |
|
|
|
220,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
(6) |
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran(1)(4)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
75,467 |
|
|
|
74,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
3,090 |
(9) |
|
Executive Vice President &
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
56,422 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,913 |
(9) |
|
Managing Director
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
50,230 |
|
|
|
47,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
(9) |
|
|
(1) |
Such Named Executive has entered into a Severance and
Noncompetition Agreement with us. See Severance and
Noncompetition Agreements. |
|
(2) |
The bonus awards were earned in the year indicated and were paid
in the following year. |
|
(3) |
The value of certain personal benefits is not included since the
aggregate amount of such compensation did not exceed the lesser
of either $50,000 or 10% of the total of annual salary and bonus
reported for such Named Executive in columns (c) and (d). |
|
(4) |
We employ the Named Executive in India, and as such,
compensation amounts were paid in Indian Rupees. Such amounts
were converted to U.S. dollars for the periods presented. |
|
(5) |
Represents an Indian Provident Fund matching contribution. |
|
(6) |
Represents a 401(k) plan matching contribution. |
|
(7) |
Includes (i) a 401(k) plan matching contribution in the
amount of $6,500; (ii) a contribution to a non-qualified
deferred compensation account in the amount of $37,365 earned by
the Named Executive during 2004 and payable by Cognizant during
2005; and (iii) $887 of other compensation. |
|
(8) |
Includes (i) a 401(k) plan matching contribution in the
amount of $6,000, and (ii) a contribution to a
non-qualified deferred compensation account in the amount of
$43,249 earned by the Named Executive during 2003 and payable by
Cognizant during 2004. |
|
(9) |
Consists of Indian Provident matching fund contributions of
$3,090, $2,253 and $2,240 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
and interest savings of $660 and $1,590 in 2003 and 2002,
respectively, on a loan made to Mr. Chandrasekaran by us in
August 1995, which bore interest at 2% per annum.
Mr. Chandrasekaran repaid such loan in July 2003. |
13
Option Grants in 2004
The following table sets forth information concerning individual
grants of stock options during 2004 by us to the Named Executive
listed below. No stock options were granted to any of the other
Named Executives during 2004. No stock appreciation rights were
granted to the Named Executives during 2004.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Total Options | |
|
|
|
At Assumed Annual Rates | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
of Stock Price Appreciation | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise or | |
|
|
|
for Option Term | |
Name |
|
Granted(1) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Base Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
(a) |
|
(#)(b) | |
|
(%)(c) | |
|
($/SH)(1)(d) | |
|
Date (e) | |
|
5% ($)(f) | |
|
10% ($)(g) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
$ |
22.89 |
|
|
|
3/4/14 |
|
|
$ |
575,690 |
|
|
$ |
1,458,912 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Such numbers have been adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock
split that occurred on June 17, 2004. |
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2004 and Year-End Option
Values
The following table sets forth information concerning each
exercise of options during 2004 by each of the Named Executives
and the year-end number and value of unexercised options held by
each of the Named Executives. No stock appreciation rights were
held or exercised by the Named Executives during 2004.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Unexercised Options | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
at Fiscal Year-End | |
|
Fiscal Year-End ($) | |
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
(#) Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ Unexercisable | |
Name(a) |
|
(#)(B) | |
|
(c)(2) | |
|
Unexercisable (d) | |
|
(e)(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lakshmi Narayanan
|
|
|
150,691 |
|
|
$ |
5,593,180 |
|
|
|
1,119,809/ 526,500 |
|
|
|
43,493,934/ 17,736,758 |
|
Francisco DSouza
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,782,845 |
|
|
|
141,080/ 468,000 |
|
|
|
4,715,188/ 15,658,290 |
|
Gordon J. Coburn
|
|
|
204,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,758,511 |
|
|
|
1,000/ 400,500 |
|
|
|
32,215/ 13,483,778 |
|
Ramakrishnan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandrasekaran
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
739,309 |
|
|
|
143,000/ 100,000 |
|
|
|
5,679,407/ 2,972,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All numbers on this chart have been adjusted to account for the
two-for-one stock split that occurred on June 17, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Based on the market price of the purchased shares on the
exercise date less the option exercise price paid for those
shares. |
|
(3) |
Based on a year-end fair market value of the underlying
securities equal to $42.33, less the exercise price for such
shares. |
14
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2004 with respect to the shares of our Class A Common Stock
that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
Securities to be | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Available for | |
|
|
Issued Upon | |
|
Average Exercise | |
|
Future Issuance | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Price of | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Compensation | |
Plan Category |
|
Options(1) | |
|
Options(1) | |
|
Plans(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans that have been approved by security
holders(2)
|
|
|
19,750,904 |
(3) |
|
$ |
10.36 |
|
|
|
5,021,702 |
(4) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
19,750,904 |
|
|
$ |
10.36 |
|
|
|
5,021,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Such numbers have been adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock
split that occurred on June 17, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Consists of the 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, the Director
Plan, the Key Employees Stock Option Plan and the 2004
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
(3) |
Excludes purchase rights outstanding under the 2004 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, employees may purchase up
to $25,000 worth of stock annually at price per share equal to
90% of the lower of the fair market value per share on the first
day of the purchase period or the fair market value per share on
the last day of the purchase period. |
|
(4) |
Includes 1,486,410 shares of Class A Common Stock
available for future issuance under the 1999 Incentive
Compensation Plan, however, does not include the additional
1,500,000 shares that would be available if the proposal to
increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the
Incentive Plan is approved at the Meeting. Shares may be issued
under such plan upon the exercise of stock options and stock
appreciation rights, or they may be issued through direct stock
issuances or pursuant to stock units, performance shares or
performance units without cash consideration. Also includes
14,000 shares of Class A Common Stock available for
future issuances pursuant to the Director Plan,
761,580 shares of Class A Common Stock available for
future issuances pursuant to the Key Employees Stock
Option Plan and 2,759,712 shares of Class A Common
Stock issuable under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
Severance and Noncompetition Agreements
We have entered into a Severance and Noncompetition Agreement
(collectively, the Severance and Noncompetition
Agreements) with each of the Named Executives. The
Severance and Noncompetition Agreements provide that each Named
Executive will receive one years base salary and a full
annual bonus upon termination of employment, other than in the
case of a termination for cause. In addition, such agreements
provide that all options held by the Named Executives will vest
in full immediately upon a change of control. Pursuant to such
agreements, each Named Executive has agreed not to engage in any
competitive business in any capacity for one year following
termination of employment and not to solicit any of our
employees to leave our employ within the one-year period
following termination of employment. Finally, such agreements
include customary proprietary rights assignment and
confidentiality provisions.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Howe,
Klein and Weissman. Messrs. Howe, Klein and Weissman have
not served as either one of our officers or employees or an
officer or employee of one of our subsidiaries at any time.
There are no, and during 2004 there were no, Compensation
Committee Interlocks.
In 2004, we granted options to purchase shares of our
Class A Common Stock to each of Mr. Howe,
Mr. Klein and Mr. Weissman. See Election of
Directors Compensation of Directors.
15
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder
return on our Class A Common Stock with the cumulative
total return on the Nasdaq 100 Index, S&P MidCap 400 Index
and a Peer Group Index (capitalization weighted) for the period
beginning January 1, 2000 and ending on the last day of our
last completed fiscal year. The stock performance shown on the
graph below is not indicative of future price performance.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)(2)
Among Cognizant, the Nasdaq 100 Index, the S&P MidCap 400
Index, And a Peer Group Index(3)
(Capitalization Weighted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1/1/00 |
|
|
12/31/00 |
|
|
12/31/01 |
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
66.44 |
|
|
|
$ |
74.98 |
|
|
|
$ |
132.15 |
|
|
|
$ |
250.51 |
|
|
|
$ |
464.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P MidCap 400 Index
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
117.51 |
|
|
|
$ |
116.80 |
|
|
|
$ |
99.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
135.41 |
|
|
|
$ |
157.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq 100 Index
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
63.15 |
|
|
|
$ |
42.53 |
|
|
|
$ |
26.55 |
|
|
|
$ |
39.59 |
|
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Index (Capitalization Weighted)
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
42.14 |
|
|
|
$ |
31.29 |
|
|
|
$ |
30.02 |
|
|
|
$ |
45.97 |
|
|
|
$ |
62.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Graph assumes $100 invested on January 1, 2000 in our
Class A Common Stock, the Nasdaq 100 Index, the S&P
MidCap 400 Index and the Peer Group Index (capitalization
weighted). |
|
(2) |
Cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends. |
|
(3) |
We have constructed a Peer Group Index of other information
technology consulting firms consisting of Computer Horizons
Corp., Computer Task Group, Inc., Covansys Corporation, Diamond
Cluster International, Inc., iGate Corp., Infosys Technologies
Ltd., Keane, Inc. Sapient Corp., Satyam Computer Services Ltd,
Syntel, Inc. and Wipro Ltd. We believe that these companies most
closely resemble our business mix and that their performance is
representative of our industry. |
16
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has furnished the following report:
Our executive compensation policy is designed to attract and
retain highly qualified individuals for our executive positions
and to provide incentives for such executives to achieve maximum
Company performance by aligning the executives interest
with that of stockholders by basing a portion of compensation on
corporate performance.
The Compensation Committee reviews and determines base salary
levels for our executive officers on an annual basis and
determines actual bonuses after the end of the fiscal year based
upon Company and individual performance. Additionally, the
Compensation Committee administers all of our stock option plans.
Our executive officer compensation program is comprised of base
salary, discretionary annual cash bonuses, stock options and
various other benefits, including health insurance and a 401(k)
Plan, which are generally available to all of our employees.
Salaries are established in accordance with industry standards
through review of publicly available information concerning the
compensation of officers of comparable companies. Consideration
is also given to relative responsibility, seniority, individual
experience and performance. Salary increases are generally made
based on increases in the industry for similar companies with
similar performance profiles and/or attainment of certain
division or Company goals. As part of determining the
compensation for our executive officers for the 2003 fiscal
year, the Compensation Committee had an independent third party
specializing in executive compensation prepare a formal study
comparing the compensation packages of our executive officers to
executive officers with comparable positions at a peer group of
companies. In determining the compensation for our executive
officers for the 2004 fiscal year, the compensation committee
consulted with the same independent third party specializing in
executive compensation to validate the applicability of the
survey utilized in 2003, and make any changes necessary based on
changes in the marketplace and the promotions received by our
executive officers.
Bonuses are paid on an annual basis. The amount of bonus is
based on criteria designed to effectively measure a particular
executives attainment of goals which relate to our overall
performance. The annual incentive bonus is based on our
achieving certain levels of revenue, operating income and days
sales outstanding (DSO).
The stock option program is designed to relate executives
and certain middle managers and other key personnels
long-term interests to stockholders long-term interests.
In general, stock option awards are granted if warranted by our
growth and profitability. Stock options are awarded on the basis
of individual performance and/or the achievement of internal
strategic objectives.
The option grants are designed to align the interests of each
executive officer with those of the Companys stockholders
and provide each individual with a significant incentive to
manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an
equity stake in the business. Each grant allows the individual
to acquire shares of the Companys Common Stock at a fixed
price per share (the closing market price on the grant date)
over a specified period of time (up to 10 years). Each
option generally vests and becomes exercisable in installments
over the executive officers continued employment with the
Company. Accordingly, in general, the option will provide a
return to the executive officer only if the executive officer
remains employed by the Company during the applicable vesting
period, and then only if the market price of the underlying
shares appreciates over the option term.
The number of shares subject to each option grant is set at a
level intended to create a meaningful opportunity for stock
ownership based on the officers current position with the
Company, the size of comparable awards made to individuals in
similar positions within the industry, the individuals
potential for increased responsibility and promotion over the
option term, and the individuals personal performance in
recent periods. The Compensation Committee also takes into
account the number of unvested options held by the executive
officer in order to maintain an appropriate level of equity
incentive for that individual. However,
17
the Compensation Committee does not adhere to any specific
guidelines as to the relative option holdings of the
Companys executive officers.
CEO Compensation. The Committee established the Chief
Executive Officers total annual compensation based on the
size, complexity and historical performance of our business, our
position as compared to our peers in the industry, and the
specific challenges faced by us during the year, such as changes
in the market for information technology products and services
and other industry factors. No specific weight was assigned to
any of the above criteria relative to the Chief Executive
Officers compensation.
With respect to the Chief Executive Officers base salary,
it is the Compensation Committees intent to provide him
with a level of stability and certainty each year and not have
this particular component of compensation affected to any
significant degree by corporate performance factors. For the
2004 fiscal year, the Committee raised his base salary from the
level in effect in 2003 based on his promotion to Chief
Executive Officer from Chief Operation Officer and the
Committees consultation with an independent third party
specializing in executive compensation. The Chief Executive
Officer was also eligible for a cash bonus for the 2004 fiscal
year which was conditioned on our attainment of specified
performance goals tied to the same targets in effect for our
other executive officers for the 2004 fiscal year. Based on our
performance for the 2004 fiscal year, a bonus of $261,293 was
awarded to the Chief Executive Officer.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies
for certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid to
our CEO and the four other most highly compensated executive
officers. Certain compensation, including qualified
performance-based compensation, will not be subject to the
deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The
Compensation Committee reviews the potential effect of
Section 162(m) periodically and uses its judgment to
authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the limit
when the Compensation Committee believes such payments are
appropriate and in our best interests and the best interest of
our stockholders, after taking into consideration changing
business conditions and the performance of our employees. The
Compensation Committee believes it is important to maintain cash
and equity incentive compensation at the requisite level to
attract and retain the executive officers essential to the
Companys growth and financial success, even if all or part
of that compensation may not be deductible by reason of the
Section 162(m) limitation. However, for the 2004 fiscal
year, the total amount of compensation paid by the Company
(whether in the form of cash payments or upon the exercise or
vesting of equity awards) should be deductible and not affected
by the Section 162(m) limitation.
|
|
|
By the Compensation Committee of the Board of |
|
Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions |
|
Corporation |
|
|
Robert W. Howe |
|
John E. Klein |
|
Robert E. Weissman |
18
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
Class A Common Stock
As of March 31, 2005, there were approximately 267 holders
of record and 29,655 beneficial holders of our Class A
Common Stock. The following table sets forth certain
information, as of March 31, 2005, with respect to holdings
of each class of our Class A Common Stock by (i) each
person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the total
number of shares of each class of Class A Common Stock
outstanding as of such date, (ii) each of our Directors
(which includes all nominees), (iii) each of our Named
Executives, and (iv) all Directors and executive officers
as a group. This information is based upon information furnished
to us by each such person and/or based upon public filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address for the individuals below is our address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of | |
|
Percent of | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficial Ownership(1) | |
|
Class(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(i) Certain Beneficial Owners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.(3)
|
|
|
19,931,137 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
(ii) Directors (which includes all nominees) and
Named Executives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakshmi Narayanan(4)
|
|
|
1,391,309 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
Francisco DSouza(5)
|
|
|
399,222 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Gordon J. Coburn(6)
|
|
|
159,001 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran(7)
|
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Robert W. Howe(8)
|
|
|
73,400 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
John E. Klein(9)
|
|
|
310,600 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Venetia Kontogouris(10)
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Robert E. Weissman(11)
|
|
|
273,444 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Thomas M. Wendel(12)
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
(iii) All Directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons)(13)
|
|
|
3,092,976 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Except as set forth in the footnotes to this table and subject
to applicable community property law, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares of Class A Common Stock shown as beneficially owned
by such stockholder. All share numbers have been adjusted to
account for a two-for-one stock split that occurred on
June 17, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Applicable percentage of ownership is based on an aggregate of
135,202,634 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding
on March 31, 2005, plus any presently exercisable stock
options held by each such holder, and options which will become
exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2005. |
|
(3) |
As disclosed on a Schedule 13G/ A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005, assuming no
changes in beneficial ownership since such filing. According to
such Schedule 13G/ A, FMR Corp., may be deemed to
beneficially own 19,931,137 shares of Class A Common
Stock as a result of acting as investment advisor to various
investment companies. FMR Corp. reports that it has sole power
to vote or direct the vote of 283,556 shares and sole power
to dispose or direct the disposition of 19,931,137 shares.
Fidelity Management & Research Company
(Fidelity), a wholly-owned subsidiary or FMR Corp.,
is the beneficial owner of 19,647,580 shares of our
Class A Common Stock as a result of acting as investment
advisor to various investment companies. The ownership of one
investment company, Fidelity Growth Company Fund, amounts to
8,622,358 shares of our Class A Common Stock. Edward
C. Johnson 3d, FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity, and
the funds each have sole power to dispose of
19,647,581 shares owned by the funds. |
19
|
|
(4) |
Represents 1,391,309 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
255,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(5) |
Includes 84,142 shares of Class A Common Stock owned
of record and 315,080 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
240,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(6) |
Includes 7,501 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of
record and 151,500 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
195,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options, which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(7) |
Represents 183,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
60,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(8) |
Includes 13,400 shares of Class A Common Stock owned
of record and 60,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(9) |
Includes 190,600 shares of Class A Common Stock owned
of record and 120,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 6,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of
record and 252,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(11) |
Includes 253,444 shares of Class A Common Stock owned
of record and 20,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(12) |
Represents 45,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31,
2005 or 60 days after such date. Excludes
10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying
options which become exercisable over time after such period. |
|
(13) |
Includes an aggregate of 2,537,889 shares of Class A
Common Stock underlying options granted to Directors and
executive officers listed in the table which are exercisable as
of March 31, 2005 or within 60 days after such date.
Excludes 800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options granted to executive officers and Directors,
which become exercisable over time after such period. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During 2004, there were no transactions or series of
transactions between the Company and its directors, executive
officers or 5% stockholders other than such matters disclosed
herein under the captions Executive Compensation and
Election of Directors Compensation of
Directors.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 1999 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The Incentive Plan was adopted by Board of Directors on
April 13, 1999 and approved by our stockholders on
May 25, 1999. As of March 31, 2005, an aggregate
maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of stock options or other awards
granted under the Incentive Plan was 36,000,000, of which
1,375,260 shares remained available for future grant.
20
If stockholder approval of this proposal to amend the Incentive
Plan is obtained, the following changes will be made to the
Incentive Plan: (i) the maximum number of shares of
Class A Common Stock of Cognizant reserved for issuance
under the Incentive Plan will increase from 36,000,000 to
37,500,000 shares and we will reserve an additional
1,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for issuance
upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights
or for the issuance of other awards granted under the Incentive
Plan, (ii) the Compensation Committee may not, without the
consent of our stockholders, reprice any outstanding award
granted under the Incentive Plan, (iii) subject to certain
exceptions, any award granted under the Incentive Plan (other
than a stock option or stock appreciation right) that is not
subject to performance criteria must be subject to a vesting
schedule which requires at least three years of service, with
the award to vest in equal installments over such three year
period, (iv) subject to certain exceptions, any award
granted under the Incentive Plan (other than a stock option or
stock appreciation right) that is subject to performance
criteria must vest over a performance period of at least
12 months in one or more installments over that period, and
(v) all amendments to the Incentive Plan considered
material in the reasonable judgment of the Compensation
Committee shall be subject to stockholder approval.
A copy of the proposed amendment to the Incentive Plan is
attached hereto as Appendix B.
General
The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to:
|
|
|
|
|
aid us in motivating certain employees, non-employee Directors
and independent contractors to put forth maximum efforts toward
our growth, profitability and success; and |
|
|
|
provide incentives which will attract and retain highly
qualified individuals as employees and non-employee Directors
and to assist in aligning the interests of such employees and
non-employee Directors with those of our stockholders. |
Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, all of our employees, all of our
non-employee Directors and all of our independent contractors
are eligible to receive awards that may be stock-based or
payable in cash. Subject to adjustment, for among other things,
a merger, consolidation, reorganization, stock split, or other
change in capital structure, an individual is limited to a
maximum of 9,000,000 shares during the life of the
Incentive Plan. Additionally, the maximum dollar amount paid in
cash to any individual during the life of the Incentive Plan is
$10,000,000. Stockholder approval of this proposal will also
constitute re-approval of those limitations for purposes of
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Such limitations will
assure that any deductions to which we would otherwise be
entitled upon the exercise of stock options or stock
appreciation rights granted under the Incentive Plan will not be
subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax
deductibility of compensation paid per executive officer imposed
under Section 162(m). In addition, one or more other awards
under the Incentive Plan may also qualify as performance-based
compensation that is not subject to the Section 162(m)
limitation, if the vesting of those awards is tied solely to the
attainment of one or more of the corporate performance
milestones discussed below in the section entitled
Performance Vesting.
The Incentive Plan terminates on April 13, 2009, unless
sooner terminated by the Board of Directors. The Board may amend
the Incentive Plan, except that no such action can adversely
affect awards previously granted. Without stockholder approval,
the Board may not:
|
|
|
|
|
increase the total amount of the Class A Common Stock
allocated to the Incentive Plan (except for permitted capital
adjustments); |
|
|
|
increase the maximum amount of the Class A Common Stock
with respect to all awards measured in Class A Common Stock
that may be granted to any individual under the Incentive Plan; |
|
|
|
increase the maximum dollar amount that may be paid with respect
to all awards measured in cash; or |
|
|
|
modify the requirements as to eligibility for awards. |
21
Additionally, stockholder approval is necessary if an amendment
is required by the stock exchange or national market system on
which the Class A Common Stock is listed. If stockholder
approval of this proposal to amend the Incentive Plan is
obtained, further stockholder approval will be necessary if any
future amendment is considered material in the reasonable
judgment of the Compensation Committee.
The Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee. Subject to the provisions of the Incentive Plan, the
Compensation Committee has the authority, among other things, to
do the following:
|
|
|
|
|
determine eligibility for participation; |
|
|
|
determine eligibility for and the type and size of awards; |
|
|
|
issue administrative guidelines and make rules as an aid to
administer the Incentive Plan; |
|
|
|
grant waivers of terms, conditions, restrictions and
limitations; and |
|
|
|
accelerate the vesting of any award. |
Types of Awards
Several types of awards are provided for by the Incentive Plan.
The awards may be measured in stock or in cash. An award may be
designated as a stock option, stock appreciation right, stock
award, stock unit, performance share, performance unit or cash.
Stock Options. The Incentive Plan provides for the
granting of options intended to qualify as incentive stock
options, or ISOs, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The
Incentive Plan also provides for the granting of non-qualified
stock options, or NQSOs. ISOs or NQSOs may be granted to
employees, while only NQSOs may be granted to non-employee
Directors and independent contractors. ISOs granted under the
Incentive Plan may not be granted at an exercise price less than
fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.
NQSOs granted under the Incentive Plan may not be granted at an
exercise price less than fair market value of the underlying
shares on the date of grant unless the Compensation Committee
determines otherwise on the date of grant. However, if
stockholder approval of this proposal to amend the Incentive
Plan is obtained, NQSOs may no longer be granted at an exercise
price less than fair market of the underlying shares on the date
of grant. Unless the Compensation Committee specifies otherwise,
options granted under the Incentive Plan become exercisable to
the extent of 25% of the grant on each of the first, second,
third and fourth anniversary of the grant. Under the Incentive
Plan, ISOs and NQSOs expire 10 years after the grant.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights
(SARs) entitle their recipients to receive payments
in cash, Class A Common Stock or a combination as
determined by the Compensation Committee. Any such payments will
represent the appreciation in the market value of a specified
number of shares from the date of grant until the date of
exercise. Such appreciation will be measured by the excess of
the fair market value on the exercise date over the fair market
value of the Class A Common Stock, or other valuation
(which shall be no less than the fair market value of the
Class A Common Stock) on the effective date of grant of
SARs or the grant of an award which the SAR replaced.
Stock Awards. A stock award consists of shares of
Class A Common Stock, subject to such terms and conditions
as determined by the Compensation Committee. A grantee of a
stock award has all of the rights of a holder of shares of
Class A Common Stock unless otherwise determined by the
Compensation Committee on the date of grant.
Stock Units. A stock unit is a hypothetical share of
Class A Common Stock represented by a notional account
established and maintained or caused to be established and
maintained by us for a grantee of a stock unit. Stock units are
subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the
Compensation Committee. A stock unit shall provide for payment
in shares of Class A Common Stock at such time as the award
agreement shall specify. The Compensation Committee has the sole
discretion to pay the stock unit in Class A Common Stock,
cash or a combination.
22
Performance Shares. A performance share consists of a
share or shares of Class A Common Stock, subject to such
terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation
Committee. Such terms and conditions may include, among other
things, a determination of performance goals which will
determine the number and/or value of the performance shares that
will be paid out or distributed. The Compensation Committee has
the sole discretion to pay the performance share in Class A
Common Stock, cash or a combination.
Performance Unit. A performance unit is a hypothetical
share or shares of Class A Common Stock represented by a
notional account established and maintained or caused to be
established and maintained by us for a grantee of a performance
unit. Performance units are subject to such terms and conditions
as determined by the Compensation Committee. Such terms and
conditions may include, among other things, a determination of
performance goal or goals which will determine the number and/or
value of the performance units that will be accrued. The
Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to pay the
performance units in Class A Common Stock, cash or a
combination.
Cash Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant cash
awards subject to such terms and conditions as it determines
appropriate.
Performance Vesting. Subject to certain criteria,
Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to designate
awards as performance-based awards if it determines that such
compensation might not be tax deductible by us under
Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee may
use the following performance measures (either individually or
in any combination) to set performance goals with respect to the
vesting of awards intended to qualify as performance-based
awards: net sales; pretax income before allocation of corporate
overhead and bonus; budget; cash flow; earnings per share; net
income; division, group or corporate financial goals; return on
stockholders equity; return on assets; attainment of
strategic and operational initiatives; appreciation in and/or
maintenance of the price of the Class A Common Stock or any
of our other publicly-traded securities; market share; gross
profits; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; economic
value-added models; comparisons with various stock market
indices; increase in number of customers; and/or reductions in
costs.
Termination of Employment. In the event a grantees
employment is terminated due to death or disability, all
non-vested portions of awards are forfeited. All vested portions
of stock options or SARs remain exercisable during the shorter
of the remaining stated term of the stock option or SAR or
twelve months following the date of death or disability. If a
grantees employment is terminated for cause, as defined in
the Incentive Plan, all awards, whether vested or non-vested,
are forfeited. If a grantees employment is terminated any
other reason other than for cause or due to death or disability,
all non-vested portions of awards are forfeited and all vested
portions of stock options or SARs remain exercisable during the
shorter of the remaining stated term of the award or
90 days following the date of termination. Notwithstanding
the above, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion,
provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
the vesting of any or all non-vested portions of stock options
or SARs held by a grantee on the date of his or her death or
termination shall be accelerated and remain exercisable for the
term of the stock option or SAR; |
|
|
|
any or all vested portions of non-qualified stock options or
SARs held by a grantee on the date of his or her death or
termination shall remain exercisable until a date that occurs on
or prior to the date the stock option or SAR is scheduled to
expire; and/or |
|
|
|
any or all non-vested portions of stock awards, stock units,
performance shares, performance units and/or cash awards held by
a grantee on the date of his or her death or termination shall
become vested on a date that occurs on or prior to the date the
award is scheduled to vest. |
However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of such
performance measures may be waived with respect to awards that
are intended at the time of grant to qualify as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the
Code, except in the event of certain involuntary terminations or
changes in control.
23
Transferability. Generally, all awards under the
Incentive Plan are nontransferable except by will or in
accordance with the laws of descent and distribution. Stock
options and SARs are exercisable only by the grantee during his
or her lifetime. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion,
may permit the transferability of a stock option (other than an
ISO) by a grantee to members of his or her immediate family or
trusts or other similar entities for the benefit of such person.
Change in Control
Upon the occurrence of a change in control of Cognizant, as
defined in the Incentive Plan, with certain exceptions, the
Compensation Committee has the discretion to, among other
things, accelerate the vesting and payout of outstanding awards
or provide that an award be assumed by the entity which acquires
control of us or be substituted by a similar award under such
entitys compensation plan.
Amendments to the Incentive Plan
Federal Tax Aspects of the Incentive Plan
The following is a summary of the Federal income taxation
treatment applicable to us and the participants who receive
awards under the Incentive Plan.
Option Grants. Options granted under the discretionary
grant program may be either incentive stock options which
satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or
non-statutory options which are not intended to meet such
requirements. The Federal income tax treatment for the two types
of options differs as follows:
|
|
|
Incentive Options. No taxable income is recognized by the
optionee at the time of the option grant, and no taxable income
is recognized for regular tax purposes at the time the option is
exercised, although taxable income may arise at that time for
alternative minimum tax purposes. The optionee will recognize
taxable income in the year in which the purchased shares are
sold or otherwise made the subject of certain other
dispositions. For Federal tax purposes, dispositions are divided
into two categories: (i) qualifying and
(ii) disqualifying. A qualifying disposition occurs if the
sale or other disposition is made more than two (2) years
after the date the option for the shares involved in such sale
or disposition is granted and more than one (1) year after
the date the option is exercised for those shares. If the sale
or disposition occurs before these two periods are satisfied,
then a disqualifying disposition will result. |
|
|
Upon a qualifying disposition, the optionee will recognize
long-term capital gain in an amount equal to the excess of
(i) the amount realized upon the sale or other disposition
of the purchased shares over (ii) the exercise price paid
for the shares. If there is a disqualifying disposition of the
shares, then the excess of (i) the fair market value of
those shares on the exercise date or (if less) the amount
realized upon such sale or disposition over (ii) the
exercise price paid for the shares will be taxable as ordinary
income to the optionee. Any additional gain recognized upon the
disposition will be a capital gain. |
|
|
If the optionee makes a disqualifying disposition of the
purchased shares, then we will be entitled to an income tax
deduction, for the taxable year in which such disposition
occurs, equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
optionee as a result of the disposition. We will not be entitled
to any income tax deduction if the optionee makes a qualifying
disposition of the shares. |
|
|
Non-Statutory Options. No taxable income is recognized by
an optionee upon the grant of a non-statutory option. The
optionee will in general recognize ordinary income, in the year
in which the option is exercised, equal to the excess of the
fair market value of the purchased shares on the exercise date
over the exercise price paid for the shares, and we will be
required to collect the withholding taxes applicable to such
income from the optionee. |
|
|
If the shares acquired upon exercise of the non-statutory option
are unvested and subject to repurchase by us in the event of the
optionees termination of service prior to vesting in those
shares, then the optionee will not recognize any taxable income
at the time of exercise but will have to report as |
24
|
|
|
ordinary income, as and when our repurchase right lapses, an
amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of
the shares on the date the repurchase right lapses over
(ii) the exercise price paid for the shares. The optionee
may, however, elect under Section 83(b) of the Code to
include as ordinary income in the year of exercise of the option
an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value
of the purchased shares on the exercise date over (ii) the
exercise price paid for such shares. If the Section 83(b)
election is made, the optionee will not recognize any additional
income as and when the repurchase right lapses. |
|
|
We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the
amount of ordinary income recognized by the optionee with
respect to the exercised non-statutory option. The deduction
will in general be allowed for our taxable year in which such
ordinary income is recognized by the optionee. |
Stock Appreciation Rights. No taxable income is
recognized upon receipt of a stock appreciation right. The
holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the
stock appreciation right is exercised, in an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of
common stock on the exercise date over the base price in effect
for the exercised right, and we will be required to collect the
withholding taxes applicable to such income from the holder.
We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the
amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder in connection
with the exercise of the stock appreciation right. The deduction
will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary
income is recognized.
Direct Stock Issuances. The tax principles applicable to
direct stock issuances under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan will
be substantially the same as those summarized above for the
exercise of non-statutory option grants.
Restricted Stock Units. No taxable income is recognized
upon receipt of a restricted stock unit. The holder will
recognize ordinary income in the year in which the shares
subject to that unit are actually issued to the holder. The
amount of that income will be equal to the fair market value of
the shares on the date of issuance, and we will be required to
collect the withholding taxes applicable to such income from the
holder. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to
the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder at the
time the shares are issued. The deduction will be allowed for
the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation. We anticipate
that any compensation deemed paid by us in connection with the
disqualifying disposition of incentive stock option shares or
the exercise of non-statutory options or stock appreciation
rights will qualify as performance-based compensation for
purposes of Code Section 162(m) and will not have to be
taken into account for purposes of the $1 million
limitation per covered individual on the deductibility of the
compensation paid to certain of our executive officers.
Accordingly, the compensation deemed paid with respect to
options and stock appreciation rights granted under the
Incentive Plan will remain deductible by us without limitation
under Section 162(m). However, any compensation deemed paid
by us in connection with other awards will be subject to the
$1 million limitation, unless the vesting of those awards
tied solely to one or more of the performance milestones
described above under the section entitled Performance
Vesting.
Previously Granted Options Under the Incentive Plan
As of March 31, 2005, options to
purchase 34,624,740 shares of Class A Common
Stock have been granted (net of forfeitures which are added back
to the shares available for issuance under the Incentive Plan)
under the Incentive Plan. The weighted average exercise price of
such options is $8.12 per share.
25
The following table sets forth certain information as of
March 31, 2005 with respect to options granted (net of
forfeitures) under the Incentive Plan since inception to
(i) the Named Executives; (ii) all current executive
officers as a group; (iii) each nominee for election as a
Director; (iv) all current Directors who are not executive
officers as a group; (v) each associate of any of such
Directors, executive officers or nominees; (vi) each person
who has received or is to receive 5% of such options or rights;
and (vii) all employees, including all current officers who
are not executive officers, as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Options Granted | |
|
Average Exercise | |
Name |
|
through March 31, 2005(1) | |
|
Price(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lakshmi Narayanan
|
|
|
1,485,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.68 |
|
Francisco DSouza
|
|
|
1,276,500 |
|
|
$ |
5.83 |
|
Gordon J. Coburn
|
|
|
1,197,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran
|
|
|
346,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.94 |
|
Robert W. Howe
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.46 |
|
John Klein
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.46 |
|
Venetia Kontogouris
|
|
|
242,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.84 |
|
Robert E. Weissman
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
Thomas Wendel
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
All current executive officers as a group (4 persons)
|
|
|
4,304,500 |
|
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
All current Directors who are not executive officers as a group
(5 persons)
|
|
|
742,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
All employees, including all current officers who are not
executive officers as a group (1,757 persons)
|
|
|
29,116,240 |
|
|
$ |
8.67 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Such numbers reflect the two-for-one stock split that occurred
on June 17, 2004. |
As of March 31, 2005, the market value of the Class A
Common Stock underlying the Incentive Plan was $46.20 per
share.
Proposed Amendment to the 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan
Stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon a
proposed amendment to the Incentive Plan to (i) increase
the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Corporation reserved for issuance from 36,000,000 to
37,500,000 shares and to reserve an additional
1,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for issuance
upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights
or for the issuance of other awards granted under the Incentive
Plan, (ii) provide that repricing of stock options may not
occur without stockholder approval, (iii) provide for
minimum vesting periods for stock based awards, other than stock
options or stock appreciation rights, (iv) provide that
stock options may not be granted below fair market value, and
(v) provide that all material amendments to the Incentive
Plan shall be subject to stockholder approval.
The Board of Directors believes that the amendment provides an
important inducement to recruit and retain the best available
personnel and will assist in aligning the interests of such
personnel with our stockholders interests. If the
stockholders do not approve the proposed amendment to Incentive
Plan, then none of the indicated revisions to the plan will be
implemented, and the Incentive Plan will remain in effect in
accordance with the terms and provisions in existence
immediately prior to the proposed amendment, and option grants
and other awards will continue to be made under those existing
terms and provisions of the Incentive Plan until the available
share reserve has been issued.
Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
approval of the foregoing amendment to the Incentive Plan.
26
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Our Board of Directors has, subject to stockholder approval,
retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm of for the year ending
December 31, 2005. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also served
as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2004.
Neither the accounting firm nor any of its members has any
direct or indirect financial interest in or any connection with
us in any capacity other than as auditors.
Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm for the year
ending December 31, 2005.
One or more representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is
expected to attend the Meeting and to have an opportunity to
make a statement and/or respond to appropriate questions from
stockholders.
STOCKHOLDERS PROPOSALS
Stockholders who intend to have a proposal considered for
inclusion in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under
the Exchange Act must submit the proposal to our Secretary at
our offices at 500 Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey
07666, in writing not later than January 6, 2006.
Stockholders who intend to present a proposal at such meeting
without inclusion of such proposal in our proxy materials
pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act are required
to provide advance notice of such proposal to our Secretary at
the aforementioned address not later than March 17, 2006.
If we do not receive notice of a stockholder proposal within
this timeframe, our management will use its discretionary
authority to vote the shares that they represent as our Board
may recommend.
We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other
appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not
comply with these or other applicable requirements.
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be
participating in the practice of householding proxy
statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of
our proxy statement or annual report may have been sent to
multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly
deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you call or
write us at the following address or phone number: 500
Glenpointe Centre West, Teaneck, New Jersey 07666,
(201) 801-0233. If you want to receive separate copies of
the annual report and proxy statement in the future or if you
are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one
copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker,
or other nominee record holders, or you may contact us at the
above address and phone number.
OTHER MATTERS
Our Board of Directors is not aware of any matter to be
presented for action at the Meeting other than the matters
referred to above and does not intend to bring any other matters
before the Meeting. However, if other matters should come before
the Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will
vote thereon in their discretion.
GENERAL
The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of our
Board of Directors, whose notice of meeting is attached to this
Proxy Statement, and the entire cost of such solicitation will
be borne by us.
27
In addition to the use of mail, proxies may be solicited by
personal interview, telephone and telegram by our Directors,
officers and other employees who will not be specially
compensated for these services. We have engaged
Morrow & Co., Inc. to assist us with the solicitation
of proxies. We expect to pay Morrow & Co., Inc. a fee
of $4,500 plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses for its
services. We will also request that brokers, nominees,
custodians and other fiduciaries forward soliciting materials to
the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such brokers,
nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries. We will reimburse
such persons for their reasonable expenses in connection
therewith.
Certain information contained in this Proxy Statement relating
to the occupations and security holdings of our Directors and
officers is based upon information received from the individual
Directors and officers.
If you have any questions regarding any of the matters contained
in this proxy statement you may contact Morrow & Co.,
Inc., 445 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022. Morrow &
Co., Inc. may also be reached by telephone at 1-800-607-0088.
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH,
WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF OUR REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, INCLUDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
SCHEDULES THERETO BUT NOT INCLUDING EXHIBITS, TO EACH OF OUR
STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD ON APRIL 18, 2005, AND TO EACH
BENEFICIAL STOCKHOLDER ON THAT DATE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST MADE TO
OUR SECRETARY. A REASONABLE FEE WILL BE CHARGED FOR COPIES OF
REQUESTED EXHIBITS.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD AT YOUR EARLIEST
CONVENIENCE IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. A PROMPT RETURN OF
YOUR PROXY CARD WILL BE APPRECIATED AS IT WILL SAVE THE EXPENSE
OF FURTHER MAILINGS.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon J. Coburn, |
|
Secretary |
Teaneck, New Jersey
May 5, 2005
28
APPENDIX A
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Audit Committee Charter
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors oversight of the Companys accounting and
financial reporting processes and the audits of the
Companys financial statements.
|
|
B. |
Structure and Membership |
1. Number. The Audit Committee shall consist
of at least three members of the Board of Directors.
2. Independence. Except as otherwise
permitted by the applicable NASDAQ rules, each member of the
Audit Committee shall be independent as defined by NASDAQ rules,
meet the criteria for independence set forth in
Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act (subject to the
exemptions provided in Rule 10A-3(c)), and not have
participated in the preparation of the financial statements of
the Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time
during the past three years.
3. Financial Literacy. Each member of the
Audit Committee must be able to read and understand fundamental
financial statements, including the Companys balance
sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, at the time of
his or her appointment to the Audit Committee. In addition, at
least one member must have past employment experience in finance
or accounting, requisite professional certification in
accounting, or any other comparable experience or background
which results in the individuals financial sophistication,
including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief
financial officer or other senior officer with financial
oversight responsibilities. Unless otherwise determined by the
Board of Directors (in which case disclosure of such
determination shall be made in the Companys annual report
filed with the SEC), at least one member of the Audit Committee
shall be an audit committee financial expert (as
defined by applicable SEC rules).
4. Chair. Unless the Board of Directors
elects a Chair of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee shall
elect a Chair by majority vote.
5. Compensation. The compensation of Audit
Committee members shall be as determined by the Board of
Directors. No member of the Audit Committee may receive,
directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other
compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries,
other than fees paid in his or her capacity as a member of the
Board of Directors or a committee of the Board.
6. Selection and Removal. Members of the
Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors,
upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter. The Board of Directors may remove
members of the Audit Committee from such committee, with or
without cause.
|
|
C. |
Authority and Responsibilities |
The Audit Committee shall discharge its responsibilities, and
shall assess the information provided by the Companys
management and the independent auditor, in accordance with its
business judgment. Management is responsible for the
preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Companys
financial statements and for the appropriateness of the
accounting principles and reporting policies that are used by
the Company. The independent auditors are responsible for
auditing the Companys financial statements and for
reviewing the Companys unaudited interim financial
statements. The authority and responsibilities set forth in this
Charter do not reflect or create any duty or obligation of the
Audit Committee to plan or conduct any audit, to determine or
certify that the Companys financial statements are
complete, accurate, fairly presented, or in
A-1
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or
applicable law, or to guarantee the independent auditors
report.
|
|
|
Oversight of Independent Auditors |
1. Selection. The Audit Committee shall be
solely and directly responsible for appointing, evaluating,
retaining and, when necessary, terminating the engagement of the
independent auditor. The Audit Committee may, in its discretion,
seek stockholder ratification of the independent auditor it
appoints.
2. Independence. The Audit Committee shall
take, or recommend that the full Board of Directors take,
appropriate action to oversee the independence of the
independent auditor. In connection with this responsibility, the
Audit Committee shall obtain and review a formal written
statement from the independent auditor describing all
relationships between the auditor and the Company, including the
disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1. The Audit Committee shall actively engage in
dialogue with the auditor concerning any disclosed relationships
or services that might impact the objectivity and independence
of the auditor.
3. Compensation. The Audit Committee shall
have sole and direct responsibility for setting the compensation
of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee is empowered,
without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the
Company to pay the compensation of the independent auditor
established by the Audit Committee.
4. Preapproval of Services. The Audit
Committee shall preapprove all audit services to be provided to
the Company, whether provided by the principal auditor or other
firms, and all other services (review, attest and non-audit) to
be provided to the Company by the independent auditor; provided,
however, that de minimis non-audit services may instead be
approved in accordance with applicable SEC rules.
5. Oversight. The independent auditor shall
report directly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee
shall have sole and direct responsibility for overseeing the
work of the independent auditor, including resolution of
disagreements between Company management and the independent
auditor regarding financial reporting. In connection with its
oversight role, the Audit Committee shall, from time to time as
appropriate, receive and consider the reports required to be
made by the independent auditor regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
critical accounting policies and practices; |
|
|
|
alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting
principles for policies and practices related to material items
that have been discussed with Company management, including
ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and
treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent
auditor; and |
|
|
|
other material written communications between the independent
auditor and Company management. |
In connection with its oversight role, the Audit Committee
should also review with the independent auditors, from time to
time as appropriate:
|
|
|
(i) significant risks and uncertainties with respect to the
quality, accuracy or fairness of presentation of the
Companys financial statements; |
|
|
(ii) any accounting adjustments that were noted or proposed
by the auditor but were passed (as immaterial or
otherwise); |
|
|
(iii) any management or internal
control letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the
audit firm to the Company; |
|
|
(iv) accounting for unusual transactions; |
|
|
(v) adjustments arising from audits that could have a
significant impact on the Companys financial reporting
process; and |
|
|
(vi) any recent SEC comments on the Companys SEC
reports, including in particular any unresolved or
future-compliance comments. |
A-2
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements |
6. Review and Discussion. The Audit Committee
shall review and discuss with the Companys management and
independent auditor the Companys audited financial
statements, including the matters about which Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on
Auditing Standards, AU §380) requires discussion.
7. Recommendation to Board Regarding Financial
Statements. The Audit Committee shall consider whether
it will recommend to the Board of Directors that the
Companys audited financial statements be included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
8. Audit Committee Report. The Audit
Committee shall prepare an annual committee report for inclusion
where necessary in the proxy statement of the Company relating
to its annual meeting of security holders.
|
|
|
Review of Other Financial Disclosures |
9. Independent Auditor Review of Interim Financial
Statements. The Audit Committee shall direct the
independent auditor to use its best efforts to perform all
reviews of interim financial information prior to disclosure by
the Company of such information and to discuss promptly with the
Audit Committee and the Chief Financial Officer any matters
identified in connection with the auditors review of
interim financial information which are required to be discussed
by applicable auditing standards. The Audit Committee shall
direct management to advise the Audit Committee in the event
that the Company proposes to disclose interim financial
information prior to completion of the independent
auditors review of interim financial information.
10. Oversight. The Audit Committee shall
coordinate the Board of Directors oversight of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting,
disclosure controls and procedures and code of conduct. The
Audit Committee shall receive and review the reports of the CEO
and CFO required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. The
Audit Committee shall periodically review the complaint
procedures to confirm that they are effectively operating.
11. Procedures for Complaints. The Audit
Committee shall establish procedures for (i) the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing
matters; and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by
employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters.
12. Related-Party Transactions. The Audit
Committee shall review all related party
transactions (defined as transactions required to be
disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K) on
an ongoing basis, and all such transactions must be approved by
the Audit Committee.
13. Additional Powers. The Audit Committee
shall have such other duties as may be delegated from time to
time by the Board of Directors.
|
|
D. |
Procedures and Administration |
1. Meetings. The Audit Committee shall meet
as often as it deems necessary in order to perform its
responsibilities. The Audit Committee may also act by unanimous
written consent in lieu of a meeting. The Audit Committee shall
periodically meet separately with: (i) the independent
auditor; (ii) Company management and (iii) the
Companys internal auditors. The Audit Committee shall keep
such records of its meetings as it shall deem appropriate.
2. Subcommittees. The Audit Committee may
form and delegate authority to one or more subcommittees
(including a subcommittee consisting of a single member), as it
deems appropriate from time to time under the circumstances. Any
decision of a subcommittee to preapprove audit, review, attest
or non-audit services shall be presented to the full Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
A-3
3. Reports to Board. The Audit Committee
shall report regularly to the Board of Directors.
4. Charter. At least annually, the Audit
Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter
and recommend any proposed changes to the Board of Directors for
approval.
5. Independent Advisors. The Audit Committee
is authorized, without further action by the Board of Directors,
to engage such independent legal, accounting and other advisors
as it deems necessary or appropriate to carry out its
responsibilities. Such independent advisors may be the regular
advisors to the Company. The Audit Committee is empowered,
without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the
Company to pay the compensation of such advisors as established
by the Audit Committee.
6. Investigations. The Audit Committee shall
have the authority to conduct or authorize investigations into
any matters within the scope of its responsibilities as it shall
deem appropriate, including the authority to request any
officer, employee or advisor of the Company to meet with the
Audit Committee or any advisors engaged by the Audit Committee.
7. Funding. The Audit Committee is empowered,
without further action by the Board of Directors, to cause the
Company to pay the ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit
Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its
duties.
A-4
APPENDIX B
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
2005 Amendment to 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, as
amended
WHEREAS, in April 2005, the Board of Directors of Cognizant
Technology Solutions Corporation (the Company)
deemed it to be advisable and in the bests of the Company to
further amend the Companys 1999 Incentive Compensation
Plan, as amended (the Incentive Plan) to
(i) increase the number of shares of Class A Common
Stock of the Corporation reserved for issuance thereunder from
36,000,000 to 37,500,000 shares (subject to adjustment as
provided in the Incentive Plan), (ii) provide that
repricing of stock options may not occur without stockholder
approval, (iii) provide for minimum vesting periods for
stock based awards, other than stock options or stock
appreciation rights, (iv) provide that stock options may
not be granted below fair market value, and (v) provide
that all material amendments to the Incentive Plan shall be
subject to stockholder approval; and
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the
meanings set forth in the Incentive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Incentive Plan be
amended as follows:
Section 5.1
Section 5.1 of the Incentive Plan, is hereby amended and
replaced in its entirety by the following:
5.1 Available Shares. The aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock which shall be available for
grants or payments of Awards under the Plan during its term
shall be 37,500,000 shares. Such shares of Common Stock
available for issuance under the Plan may be either authorized
but unissued shares, shares of issued stock held in the
Companys treasury, or both, at the discretion of the
Company, and subject to any adjustments made in accordance with
Section 5.2 below. Any shares of Common Stock underlying
Awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation
or otherwise without the issuance of such shares shall again be
available for grants of Awards under the Plan. Awards that are
payable only in cash are not subject to this
Section 5.1.
Section 7.2
Section 7.2 of the Incentive Plan, is hereby amended and
replaced in its entirety by the following:
7.2 Exercise Price. The Committee shall
specify the exercise price of each Stock Option in the Award
Agreement; provided, however, that the exercise price of any ISO
or Nonqualified Stock Option shall not be less than
100 percent of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on
the date of grant.
Section 16.2
The final paragraph of Section 16.2 of the Incentive Plan
is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety by the following:
In addition, the Plan shall not be amended without the
approval of such amendment by the Companys stockholders if
such amendment is required under the rules and regulations of
the stock exchange or national market system on which the Common
Stock is listed or (ii) is otherwise considered material in
the reasonable judgment of the Committee.
Section 17
The following sections shall be inserted in Section 17 of
the Incentive Plan:
17.11 Prohibition on Repricing of
Options. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the
contrary, the Committee may not, without the consent of the
Companys stockholders, reprice any outstanding Award;
provided, however, that stock splits, stock dividends and
similar events as set forth in Section 5.2 herein shall not
be deemed to be a repricing hereunder.
B-1
17.12 Minimum Vesting Periods. Except as set
forth in Section 14 herein and notwithstanding any other
provision set forth in the Plan to the contrary, (A) any
Award (other than a Stock Option or SAR) that is not subject to
performance criteria shall Vest over a service period of at
least three years, with such vesting to occur in equal
installments over such three year period, and (B) any Award
(other than a Stock Option or SAR) that is subject to
performance criteria shall Vest over a performance period of at
least 12 months in one or more installments over that
period.
Except as expressly amended by this amendment, the provisions of
the Incentive Plan shall remain in full force and effect
unamended hereby.
The foregoing amendments were adopted by the Board of Directors
on April , 2005 and approved
by the stockholders
on ,
2005.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct
copy of the 2005 Amendment to the Incentive Plan, as in effect
on the date hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon J. Coburn |
|
Secretary |
Dated: ,
2005
B-2
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
June 14, 2005
Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.
Please detach and mail in the envelope provided.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE
OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE. x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
For All Nominees
|
|
o
|
|
Robert W. Howe
|
|
o
|
|
Robert E. Weissman |
|
|
o
|
|
Withhold Authority for All Nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
For All Except (See instructions below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) mark FOR ALL
EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
TO AMEND OUR 1999 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN, AS AMENDED
(THE INCENTIVE PLAN), TO (I) INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE FROM
36,000,000 TO 37,500,000 SHARES AND TO RESERVE AN ADDITIONAL 1,500,000
SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK FOR ISSUANCE UPON THE EXERCISE OF
STOCK OPTIONS OR STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS OR FOR THE ISSUANCE
OF OTHER AWARDS GRANTED UNDER THE INCENTIVE PLAN, (II) PROVIDE
THAT REPRICING OF STOCK OPTIONS MAY NOT OCCUR WITHOUT
STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL, (III) PROVIDE FOR MINIMUM VESTING PERIODS
FOR STOCK BASED AWARDS, OTHER THAN STOCK OPTIONS OR STOCK
APPRECIATION RIGHTS, (IV) PROVIDE THAT STOCK OPTIONS MAY NOT BE
GRANTED BELOW FAIR MARKET VALUE AND (V) PROVIDE THAT ALL
MATERIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE INCENTIVE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT
TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL.
|
|
FOR
o
|
|
AGAINST
o
|
|
ABSTAIN
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2005.
|
|
FOR
o
|
|
AGAINST
o
|
|
ABSTAIN
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
TO TRANSACT SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE
THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please check the box if you are planning to attend the Meeting in person. o
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address
in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may
not be submitted via this method. o
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY, USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Class A Common Stockholder
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Class A Common Stockholder
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IF HELD JOINTLY |
|
|
|
|
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held
jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership,
please sign in partnership name by authorized person.