e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
January 2,
2011
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number:
000-30361
Illumina, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
33-0804655
|
(State or other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
9885 Towne Centre Drive,
San Diego, California
|
|
92121
(zip code)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(858) 202-4500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value (including associated
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights)
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 4, 2011, there were 127,626,004 shares
(excluding 24,868,929 shares held in treasury) of the
Registrants Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market
value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant as of July 4, 2010 (the last business day of the
Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter), based on the closing price for the Common Stock on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, was $3,554,527,753.
This amount excludes an aggregate of 41,715,009 shares of
Common Stock held by officers and directors and each person
known by the Registrant to own 10% or more of the outstanding
Common Stock. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not
be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power,
directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the direction of the
management or policies of the Registrant, or that the Registrant
is controlled by or under common control with such person.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive proxy statement for
the annual meeting of stockholders expected to be held on
May 10, 2011 are incorporated by reference into
Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Report.
ILLUMINA,
INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. These statements discuss our current
expectations concerning future results or events, including our
future financial performance. We make these forward-looking
statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided
under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
statements concerning our expectations as to our future
financial performance, results of operations, or other
operational results or metrics;
|
|
|
|
statements concerning the benefits that we expect will result
from our business activities and certain transactions we have
completed, such as product introductions, increased revenue,
decreased expenses, and avoided expenses and
expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and
strategies, anticipated developments (including new products),
and other matters that are not historical facts.
|
These statements may be made expressly in this document or may
be incorporated by reference to other documents we have filed or
will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
You can identify many of these statements by looking for words
such as anticipates, believes,
can, continue, could,
estimates, expects, intends,
may, plans, potential,
predicts, should, or will or
the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology and
similar references to future periods. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and
uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to be
materially different from any future results or events expressed
or implied by us in those statements. Many of the factors that
will determine or effect these results or events are beyond our
ability to control or project. Specific factors that could cause
actual results or events to differ from those in the
forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and commercialize further our sequencing,
BeadArraytm,
VeraCode®,
Ecotm,
and reagents technologies and to deploy new sequencing,
genotyping, gene expression, and diagnostics products and
applications for our technology platforms;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manufacture robust instrumentation and
consumables;
|
|
|
|
reductions in the funding levels to our primary customers,
including as the result of timing and amount of funding provided
by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; and
|
|
|
|
other factors detailed in our filings with the SEC, including
the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions described in
Item 1A Risk Factors below, or in information
disclosed in public conference calls, the date and time of which
are released beforehand.
|
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
annual report. We undertake no obligation, and do not intend, to
publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, to review
or confirm analysts expectations, or to provide interim
reports or updates on the progress of any current financial
quarter, whether as a result of new information, future events,
or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements contained in this annual report. Given these
uncertainties, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our
forward-looking statements.
Available
Information
Our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge
on our website, www.illumina.com. The information on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this report. Such
reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable
after filing with, or furnishing to, the SEC. The SEC also
maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers
2
that electronically file with the SEC. Copies of our annual
report on
Form 10-K
will be made available, free of charge, upon written request.
Illumina®,
Ampligase®,
Array of
Arraystm,
BeadArraytm,
BeadXpress®,
CSPro®,
DASL®,
DuraScribe®,
DuraScript®,
Ecotm,
EPICENTRE®,
Genetic
Energytm,
GoldenGate®,
GoldenGate
Indexingtm,
GenomeStudio®,
illuminaDxtm,
HiScantm,
HiSeqtm,
Infinium®,
IntelliHyb®,
iSelect®,
Making Sense Out of
Life®,
MiSeqtm,
Oligator®,
Sentrix®,
Solexa®,
TruSeqtm,
and
VeraCode®
are certain of our trademarks. This report also contains brand
names, trademarks, or service marks of companies other than
Illumina, and these brand names, trademarks, and service marks
are the property of their respective holders.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this annual
report on
Form 10-K
to Illumina, the Company,
we, us, and our refer to
Illumina, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
3
PART I
Overview
We are a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life
science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic
variation and function. We were incorporated in California in
April 1998 and reincorporated in Delaware in July 2000. Our
principal executive offices are located at 9885 Towne Centre
Drive, San Diego, California 92121. Our telephone number is
(858) 202-4500.
Using our proprietary technologies, we provide a comprehensive
line of genetic analysis solutions, with products and services
that serve a broad range of highly interconnected markets,
including sequencing, genotyping, gene expression, and molecular
diagnostics. Our customers include leading genomic research
centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, and
clinical research organizations, as well as pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, agrigenomics, and consumer genomics companies.
Our broad portfolio of systems, consumables, and analysis tools
are designed to simplify genetic analysis. This portfolio
addresses a range of genomic complexity, price points, and
throughputs, enabling researchers to select the best solution
for their scientific challenge. In 2007, through our acquisition
of Solexa, Inc., we acquired our proprietary sequencing by
synthesis (SBS) technology that is at the heart of our
leading-edge sequencing instruments. These systems can be used
to efficiently perform a range of nucleic acid (DNA, RNA)
analyses on large numbers of samples. For more focused studies,
our array-based solutions provide ideal tools to perform
genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving
single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and copy number
variation (CNV) analyses, as well as gene expression profiling,
and other DNA, RNA, and protein studies. To further enhance our
genetic analysis workflows, in January 2011 we acquired
Epicentre Technologies Corporation, a leading provider of
nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes
for sequencing and microarray applications. In 2010, through our
acquisition of Helixis, Inc., we expanded our portfolio to
include real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), one of the
most widely used technologies in life sciences. Our new Eco
Real-Time PCR System provides researchers with an affordable,
full-featured system to perform targeted validation studies.
Our operating structure is divided into two business segments,
the Life Sciences Business Unit and the Diagnostics Business
Unit. During 2010, our Diagnostics Business Unit had limited
business activity and, accordingly, operating results for both
units are reported on an aggregate basis as one operating
segment. At each reporting period end, we will reassess our
reportable operating segments, particularly as we continue to
develop our molecular diagnostics business.
Industry
Background
Genetics
Primer
The instruction set for all living cells is encoded in
deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, with the complete set of DNA for
any organism referred to as its genome. DNA contains small
regions called genes, which comprise a string of nucleotide
bases labeled A, C, G, and T, representing adenine, cytosine,
guanine, and thymine, respectively. These nucleotide bases are
present in a precise order known as the DNA sequence. When a
gene is expressed, a partial copy of its DNA
sequence called messenger RNA (mRNA) is
used as a template
4
to direct the synthesis of a protein. Proteins in turn, direct
all cellular function. The illustration below is a simplified
gene expression schematic.
Variations among organisms are due in large part to differences
in their DNA sequences. Changes caused by insertions, deletions,
inversions, or duplications of nucleotide bases may result in
certain genes becoming over-expressed (excessive protein
production), under-expressed (reduced protein production), or
silenced altogether, sometimes triggering changes in cellular
function. These changes can be the result of heredity, but most
often occur at random. The most common form of variation in
humans is called a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), which
is a variation in a single position of a nucleotide base in a
DNA sequence. Copy number variations (CNVs) occur when there are
fewer or more copies of certain genes.
In humans, genetic variation accounts for many of the physical
differences we see (height, hair, eye color, etc.). More
importantly, these genetic variations can have medical
consequences affecting disease susceptibility, including
predisposition to complex genetic diseases such as cancer,
diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimers disease.
They can also impact an individuals response to certain
drug treatments, causing them to respond well, not respond at
all, or experience adverse side effects an area of
study known as pharmacogenomics.
Scientists are studying these variations and their consequences
in humans, as well as a broad range of animals, plants, and
microorganisms. Researchers investigating human, viral, and
bacterial genetic variation are helping us to better understand
the mechanisms of disease and develop more effective
therapeutics and diagnostics. Greater insight into genetic
variation in plants (e.g., food and biofuel crops) and animals
(e.g., livestock and domestic animals) is enabling scientists to
improve crop yields and animal breeding programs.
The methods for studying genetic variation and biological
function include sequencing, SNP genotyping, CNV analysis, gene
expression profiling, and gene regulation analysis, each of
which is addressed by our breadth of products and services.
Life
Sciences Research Primer
Life science research encompasses the study of all living
things, from humans, animals, and plants, to viruses and
bacteria. It is being performed in government, university,
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and agrigenomics laboratories
around the world, where scientists are seeking to expand our
knowledge of the biological functions essential for life.
Beginning at the genetic level, where our tools are used to
elucidate the correlation between gene sequence and biological
processes, life science research expands to include the study of
the cells, tissues, organs, systems, and other components that
make up living organisms. This research
5
supports development of new, more effective clinical diagnostics
and medicines to improve human health, as well as advances in
agriculture and animal husbandry to meet the worlds
growing needs for food and energy.
Molecular
Diagnostics Primer
Molecular diagnostic assays (or tests) are designed to identify
the biological indicators linked with disease and drug
metabolism, providing physicians with information to more
effectively diagnose, treat, and monitor both acute and chronic
disease conditions. They are an integral part of personalized
healthcare, where the unique makeup of each individual will be
taken into account in diagnosing disease and managing treatment
through the use of more tailored therapies. Biological
indicators that can be measured by these assays include protein
or gene expression, methylation levels, copy number variations,
and the presence or absence of a specific gene or group of genes.
There are molecular diagnostic assays on the market for
infectious disease, cancer, and heart disease, as well as
molecular-based drug metabolism assays to help physicians select
the most effective therapy with the fewest side effects. Our
innovative technologies and products are contributing to the
development of a wide-range of potential molecular diagnostic
assays. Our own efforts in this area are currently focused on
the identification of certain genetic markers with potential
diagnostic and therapeutic utility.
Growing news coverage about the clinical relevance of newly
discovered genetic markers has prompted consumers interest
in having their personal genomes analyzed, sparking the
development of the consumer genomics market. We believe there
are distinct medical benefits, especially for people with family
histories of certain diseases, of knowing your disease
predisposition. Several companies, including Illumina, now offer
personal sequencing or genotyping services, working with
physician groups and genetic counselors to interpret the results
for consumers.
We believe the growth in consumer genomics and the use of
molecular diagnostic assays will trigger a fundamental shift in
the practice of medicine and the economics of the pharmaceutical
industry by facilitating an increased emphasis on preventative
and predictive molecular medicine, ushering in the era of
personalized medicine.
Our
Principal Markets
From the companys inception, we have believed that the
analysis of genetic variation and function will play an
increasingly important role in molecular biology, and that by
empowering genetic analysis, our tools will advance disease
research, drug development, and the creation of molecular tests.
In addition to developing sequencing- and array-based solutions
for life science, applied, and consumer genomics markets, we are
making inroads into the emerging market of molecular diagnostics.
Life
Sciences Research Market
The life sciences research market consists of laboratories
generally associated with universities, medical research
centers, government institutions, as well as biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies. Researchers at these institutions are
using our products and services in a broad spectrum of
scientific activities, such as: next-generation sequencing,
mid-to-high-complexity
genotyping and gene expression (for whole-genome discovery and
profiling), and low complexity genotyping and gene expression
(for high-throughput targeted screening). DNA sequencing is
growing the most rapidly among these three areas due to the
creation of next-generation sequencing technologies, such as
SBS. It is fueled by private and public funding, new global
initiatives to broadly characterize genetic variation, and the
migration of legacy genetic applications to sequencing-based
technologies.
Applied
Markets
We provide products and services for various other markets,
which we refer to as applied markets. The largest
among these is the Agbio market, where government
and corporate researchers use our sequencing- and array-based
tools to accelerate and enhance agricultural research. For
example, we currently offer
6
microarrays that contain SNPs for custom and focused genotyping
of seeds and crops (such as maize) and livestock (such as
cattle, horses, pigs, and sheep). Customers use them to perform
selective breeding, accelerating and enhancing the process over
traditional methods such as cross-breeding.
Molecular
Diagnostics Market
Molecular diagnostics makes up the fastest growing segment in
the clinical diagnostics market, with the primary growth drivers
being the continued discovery of genetic markers with proven
clinical utility, the increasing adoption of genetic-based
diagnostic tests, and the expansion of reimbursement programs to
include a greater number of approved molecular diagnostic tests.
We believe our BeadXpress instrument platform, using our
VeraCode technology, is ideally suited to provide a
cost-effective, high-throughput, mid- to low-multiplex solution
to the molecular diagnostic market. In April 2010, we obtained
510(K) approval for the BeadXpress platform from the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We have initiated
development of a variety of clinical diagnostic testing panels
for this platform and are continuing research into the potential
development of cancer diagnostic panels, initially focusing on
ovarian, gastric, and colorectal cancers. During the fourth
quarter of 2009, we made an FDA pre-IDE (investigational device
exemption) submission for a cytogenetics test intended to be
used on our iScan instrument platform as an aid in the postnatal
diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities known to be associated
with developmental delay and mental retardation. Following
completion of the required clinical trial, we intend to seek FDA
clearance for the iScan instrument platform and related
consumables.
Consumer
Genomics Markets
New sequencing and genotyping technologies, such as those
developed by Illumina, are driving down the cost of performing
analyses which are increasingly valuable in diagnosing disease
and evaluating disease risk. Consumer genomics is a nascent
market, but one we believe has the potential for high growth as
the cost per analysis continues to drop. In June 2009, we
launched our Individual Genome Sequencing Service, the first
physician-intermediated personal genome sequencing service for
consumers. Built around physician-patient consultation, the
service requires a physicians order to initiate the
process, with genome sequencing performed using our
CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory. We have established
collaborations with partners to perform the secondary data
analysis of a personal genome (such as calculation of disease
risk, ancestry, and information on traits of interest). Some of
our partners, as well as other companies in the
direct-to-consumer
market, use our genotyping technology and products to perform
personal genotyping services.
Our
Principal Technologies
Our unique technology platforms enable the scale of
experimentation necessary for genome-wide discovery, target
selection, and validation studies (see Figure 1 below). More
than 2,500 customer-authored scientific publications have been
published to date using these technologies, representing the
efforts of a large and dynamic Illumina user community. Through
rapid innovation, we believe we are changing the economics of
genetic research, enabling projects once considered
unapproachable to now be within reach of more investigators.
7
Figure 1: Illumina Platform Overview:
Sequencing
Technology
DNA sequencing is the process of determining the order of
nucleotide bases (A, C, G, or T) in a DNA sample. Our HiSeq
2000, HiSeq 1000, Genome Analyzer IIx, and HiScanSQ systems
represent a family of systems that we believe are setting the
standard for productivity, cost-effectiveness, and accuracy
among next-generation sequencing technologies. They are used by
customers to perform whole-genome, de novo, and targeted
re-sequencing of genomes, and to analyze specific gene regions
and genes. In January 2011, we announced the MiSeq Personal
Sequencing System, which will expand our family of sequencing
systems to include a low-cost personal sequencing system that
will provide individual researchers a sequencing platform that
can go from purified DNA to analyzed data in as few as eight
hours or can generate in excess of 1 gigabase (Gb) per run in
slightly over a day.
Whole-genome sequencing determines an organisms complete
DNA sequence. In de novo sequencing, the goal is to sequence a
representative sample from a species never before sequenced. In
targeted re-sequencing, a sequence of nucleotide bases is
compared to a standard or reference sequence from a previously
sequenced species to identify changes that reflect genetic
variation. Understanding the similarities and differences in DNA
sequence between and within species furthers our understanding
of the function of the structures encoded in the DNA.
Our DNA sequencing technology is based on our proprietary
reversible terminator-based sequencing chemistry, referred to as
sequencing by synthesis (SBS) biochemistry. In SBS, single
stranded DNA is extended from a priming site, one base at a
time, using reversible terminator nucleotides. These are DNA
bases that can be added to a growing second strand, but which
initially cannot be further extended. This means that at each
cycle of the chemistry, only one base can be added. Each base
that is added includes a fluorescent label that is specific to
the particular base (A, C, G, or T). Following incorporation,
the emitted light can be imaged to determine its color and thus
determine the base. Once this is done, an additional step
removes both the fluorescence and the blocking group that had
prevented further extension of the second
8
strand. This allows another base to be added, and the cycle can
then be repeated. Our technology is capable of generating over
600 billion bases of DNA sequence from a single experiment
with a single sample preparation. Key aspects of the SBS
chemistry are the subject of significant intellectual property
owned by us.
In our DNA sequencing systems, we apply the SBS biochemistry on
microscopic clusters of DNA. Each cluster starts as a single DNA
molecule fragment, typically a few hundred bases long, attached
to the inside surface of a flow cell. We then use a proprietary
amplification biochemistry to create copies of each starting
molecule. As the copies are made, they are covalently linked to
the surface, so they cannot diffuse away. After a number of
cycles of amplification, each cluster might have approximately
1,000 copies of the original starting molecule, but still be
only about a micron (one-millionth of a meter) in diameter. By
making so many copies, the fluorescent signal from each cluster
is significantly increased. Because the clusters are so small,
hundreds of millions of clusters can be independently formed
inside a single flow cell. This large number of clusters can
then be sequenced simultaneously by alternate cycles of SBS
biochemistry and fluorescent imaging. Sequence reads are
analyzed using specially developed data analysis software.
With the ability to generate over 600 Gb of DNA sequence per
run, our SBS sequencing technology provides researchers with the
broadest range of applications and the opportunity to sequence
even large mammalian genomes in days rather than weeks or years.
Since the launch of our first Genome Analyzer in 2007, our
systems have reduced the cost of sequencing by more than a
factor of 100.
BeadArray
Technology
Our BeadArray technology combines microscopic beads and a
substrate in a proprietary manufacturing process to produce
arrays that can perform many assays simultaneously, enabling
large-scale analysis of genetic variation and biological
function in a unique high-throughput, cost effective, and
flexible manner. The arrays manufactured using BeadArray
technology are imaged by our iScan and HiScanSQ systems for a
broad range of DNA and RNA analysis applications including SNP
discovery, SNP genotyping, CNV analysis, gene expression
analysis, and methylation analysis.
Our proprietary BeadArray technology consists of microscopic
silica beads, each bead covered with hundreds of thousands of
copies of oligonucleotides, or oligos, that act as the capture
sequences in one of our assays. We deploy our BeadArray
technology on BeadChips; silicon wafers the size of a microscope
slide, with varying numbers of sample sites per slide. BeadChips
are chemically etched to create tens of millions of wells for
each sample site.
We create unique bead pools, or sensors, for different DNA and
RNA analysis applications by affixing thousands to millions of
copies of a specific type of oligonucleotide molecule to each of
the billions of microscopic beads in a batch. We make different
batches of beads, with the beads in a given batch coated with
one particular type of molecule. The particular molecules on a
bead define that beads function as a sensor. To form an
array, a pool of coated beads is brought into contact with the
array surface where they are randomly drawn into the wells, one
bead per well. Because the beads assemble randomly into the
wells, we perform a final procedure called decoding
to determine which bead type occupies which well in the array.
We employ several proprietary methods for decoding, which is a
process that requires only a few steps to identify all the beads
in the array. One beneficial by-product of the decoding process
is a functional validation of each bead in the array. This
quality control test characterizes the performance of each bead
and can identify and eliminate use of any empty wells. We ensure
that each bead type on the array is sufficiently represented by
including multiple copies of each bead type. Multiple bead type
copies improve the reliability and accuracy of the resulting
data by allowing statistical processing of the results of
identical beads.
An experiment is performed by preparing a sample, such as DNA,
and introducing it to the array. The molecules in the sample
bind to their matching molecules on the coated beads. The
molecules in either the sample or on the bead are labeled with
fluorescent dye either before or after the binding, which can be
detected by shining a laser on the BeadChip. This allows the
detection of the molecules resulting in a quantitative analysis
of the sample.
9
Using our BeadArray technology, we achieve high-throughput
analysis with a high density of test sites per array, and are
able to format arrays in various configurations. We seek to
maximize cost effectiveness by reducing consumption of expensive
consumables and valuable samples and through the low
manufacturing costs associated with our technologies. Our
ability to vary the size, shape, and format of the well patterns
and to create specific bead pools for different applications
provides the flexibility to address multiple markets and market
segments. These features enable our BeadArray technology to be
applied to high-growth markets of SNP genotyping and CNV
analysis, and have allowed us to be a key player in the gene
expression market.
VeraCode
Technology
Our proprietary VeraCode technology is a detection method for
multiplex assays that require high precision, accuracy, and
speed. When deployed on our BeadXpress Reader System, VeraCode
technology provides a high-throughput solution for biomarker
research and validation, pharmaceutical development, industrial
and agriculture testing, clinical research, forensics, and
molecular diagnostic assay development.
The VeraCode technology platform leverages the power of digital
holographic codes to provide a detection method for multiplex
assays. VeraCode enables low-cost multiplexing from 1 to
384-plex in a single well. The VeraCode technology consists of
cylindrical glass beads (measuring 240 microns in length by 28
microns in diameter) inscribed with a unique digital holographic
code to designate and track the specific analyte or genotype of
interest throughout the multiplex reaction. When excited by a
laser, each VeraCode bead emits a unique code image, allowing
for quick and specific detection by the BeadXpress Reader System.
Depending on the desired multiplex levels, assays are created by
pooling microbeads with code diversities from one to several
hundred. Unlike traditional microarrays, the VeraCode microbeads
are used in solution, which takes advantage of solution-phase
kinetics for more rapid hybridization times, dramatically
reducing the time to achieve results.
In December 2009, we began offering VeraCode Universal Capture
and Carboxyl Beads as General Purpose Reagents (GPRs). These
royalty-free VeraCode GPR Beads provide customers with a
flexible, high-quality, cost-effective multiplexing platform to
develop their own custom multiplex assays for genotyping, CNV,
gene expression, methylation, and protein analysis studies.
Eco
Real-Time PCR Technology
In April 2010, we purchased Helixis, Inc. and its novel
real-time PCR technology, and in July 2010 introduced the Eco
Real-Time PCR System to the market. Real-Time PCR (also known as
quantitative PCR or qPCR) is used to amplify and simultaneously
quantify a targeted DNA molecule, with applications in gene
expression, viral quantification, array data validation,
pathogen detection, and genotyping. The procedure follows the
same steps as PCR, whereby thermal cycling (alternately heating
and cooling the DNA sample from 20 to 40 times) causes the DNA
to self-replicate, resulting in the doubling of DNA product with
each cycle. Real-time PCR uses various fluorescent detection
chemistries to enable the monitoring of the PCR reaction as it
progresses. Data are collected at each cycle rather than at the
end of the reaction, providing higher precision, increased
sensitivity, increased dynamic range, and higher resolution.
The Eco System combines a proprietary thermal system, four-color
multiplex capabilities, and a fine-tuned optical system to
deliver accurate qPCR results. Its unique design provides
superior thermal uniformity, supporting high-quality PCR
performance for demanding applications such as high resolution
melt (HRM) curve analysis used for SNP genotyping, DNA
fingerprinting, species identification, HLA compatibility
typing, allelic prevalence, and DNA methylation analysis.
Measuring just over one cubic foot in size, we believe the Eco
Systems overall performance rivals larger, more expensive
systems and provides us with a highly differentiated entry into
this market.
10
Our
Products
Using our proprietary technologies, our products give our
customers the ability to analyze the genome at any level of
complexity, from whole-genome sequencing to low-multiplex
assays, and enable us to serve a number of markets, including
research, agriculture, forensics, pharmaceuticals, and molecular
diagnostics.
The majority of our product sales consist of instruments and
consumables (which include reagents, flow cells, and BeadChips)
based on our proprietary technologies (see Figure 2 below). For
the fiscal years ended January 2, 2011, January 3,
2010, and December 28, 2008, instrument sales comprised
36%, 34%, and 32%, respectively, of total revenues, and
consumable sales represented 56%, 59%, and 58%, respectively, of
total revenues.
Figure 2: Illumina Product Introduction Timeline:
Based on our proprietary SBS technology, our next-generation
sequencing platforms are designed to meet the workflow, output,
and accuracy demands of a full range of sequencing applications.
Designed for high-throughput (up to 600 Gb per run and up to 80
Gb per day) sequencing, the HiSeq 2000 is fast, easy-to-use, and
cost-effective, generating the sequence of two human genomes per
run at 30× coverage for less than $5,000 (USD) in
consumable cost per genome. Offering the same cost per data
output and user experience, the HiSeq 1000 accommodates lower
throughput needs, with an easy upgrade path to the HiSeq 2000.
The Genome Analyzer IIx offers the simplest and fastest workflow
for medium to high-throughput applications, generating up to 95
Gb per run. Introduced in January 2011, with first customer
shipments expected mid-2011, our MiSeq Personal Sequencing
System delivers the fastest time to an answer (as little as
eight hours) and offers a breadth of sequencing applications in
a compact and economical instrument to meet the needs of
individual researchers.
Sequencing/Array
Combination Platforms
The HiScanSQ combines our SBS sequencing technology and iScan
microarray analysis instrumentation into one system, with a
modular design that can evolve with changing research needs.
This flexible system allows researchers to use our sequencing
and array technologies interactively to bring increased power to
their experiments.
Array
Platforms
The iScan System is our dedicated array scanner that supports
the rapid, sensitive, and accurate imaging of our array-based
genetic analysis products. It incorporates high-performance
lasers, optics, and detection systems, delivering
sub-micron
resolution and unmatched throughput rates. The iScan supports
our Infinium, GoldenGate, DASL, gene expression, and methylation
assays. Our BeadXpress Reader is designed for both small and
high-throughput laboratories conducting molecular testing with
multiplexed-based assays deployed on our VeraCode bead
technology. It supports a wide range of applications, including
DNA, RNA, and protein-based assays, and is FDA cleared for
in vitro diagnostics with specific VeraCode FDA-cleared
tests.
11
Consumables
Our InfiniumHD Whole-Genome BeadChips represent our most
technologically advanced multi-sample DNA analysis microarrays,
enabling the interrogation of up to 2.5 million markers per
sample, depending on the BeadChip. The most recent additions to
the Omni family, the HumanOmni2.5 and HumanOmni1S BeadChips,
provide comprehensive coverage of common and rare variants
identified by the 1000 Genomes Project for performing rich GWAS
projects. This product line also includes agriculturally
relevant genome panels such as the BovineHD and MaizeSNP50
BeadChips.
For researchers who want to study focused genomic regions of
interest, or are interested in organisms for which there are no
standard products, we offer iSelect Custom Genotyping BeadChips.
Easily developed to fit any experimental design, these SNP
genotyping arrays can be used to investigate from 3,000 to
1,000,000 markers targeting any species.
Our GoldenGate Universal-32 Sample BeadChip provides a flexible
customized solution for mid-plex genotyping assays performed on
the iScan System or HiScan, while the VeraCode GoldenGate
genotyping arrays are well-suited for low-plex genotyping on the
BeadXpress Reader.
We have developed a variety of sample preparation and sequencing
kits to simplify workflows and accelerate analysis. Some provide
all the necessary consumables needed for analyses, such as our
Standard Sequencing Kit (SBS chemistry on our sequencing
platforms) and Infinium Assay Kit (array-based genotyping on the
iScan System). Others support more discrete analyses, such as
our Paired-End Genomic DNA Sample Prep Kit for streamlining
library preparation for the generation of 200 500 kb
insert paired-end reads for sequencing, gene expression, and
epigenetic analysis. Our new TruSeq SBS Sequencing Kit enhances
sequencing studies with our HiSeq 2000, HiSeq 1000, Genome
Analyzer IIx and MiSeq systems, by enabling researchers to
extend the read lengths, achieve higher Gb of mappable data, and
deliver the highest yield of perfect reads to maximize the
ability to accurately characterize the genome. Through our
recent acquisition of Epicentre Technologies Corporation, we
acquired the proprietary Nextera technology for next-generation
sequencing library preparation. This technology will enable us
to offer sequencing library preparation kits with lower sample
input requirements that greatly simplify genetic analysis
workflows (from 12 hours and 9 steps, to 2 hours and 4
steps) and significantly reduce the time from sample preparation
to answer.
Real-time
PCR Platforms
The Eco Real-Time PCR System provides fast, accurate qPCR
results. Its icon-driven user interface simplifies experimental
design and setup, while a straightforward workflow streamlines
operation, enabling the system to perform qPCR on 48 samples in
less than 40 minutes. As our first entry into the qPCR market,
we believe the smaller, lower-cost, full-featured Eco System
will enable more scientists to use real-time PCR technology in
their research.
Our
Services
In addition to the products we supply to customers, we also
provide sequencing and genotyping services through our
CLIA-certified, CAP accredited laboratory.
FastTrack
Services
One of the ways in which we compete and extend the reach of our
systems in the genetic analysis market is to deliver FastTrack
Services that leverage our proprietary technologies and the
expertise of our scientists to perform genotyping and sequencing
services for our customers. We began offering genotyping
services to academic institutions, biotechnology, and
pharmaceutical customers in 2002. The in-house molecular
geneticists that make up our FastTrack Genotyping team help
customers perform GWAS projects, linkage analysis, and fine
mapping studies to meet their deadlines, employing a range of
our products, including standard and custom GoldenGate, standard
Infinium and Infinium HD, and iSelect Infinium assays. These
projects range in size from a few hundred to over 10,000 samples.
12
After five years of building an infrastructure to support
genotyping services, we expanded to deliver sequencing services
in 2007. We continue to combine the power of our proprietary SBS
technology with the consultative and analytical capabilities of
our FastTrack Sequencing team to execute high-value projects
such as whole-genome sequencing, targeted resequencing, digital
expression profiling, and small RNA discovery. Projects range
from small sample sets requiring as little as one run, to
large-scale projects such as de novo whole-genome sequencing
that demand multiple instruments running in parallel for
extended periods of time.
Service
Partnership Programs
To complement our own service capabilities, we have developed
partnered programs such as our Certified Service Providers
(CSPro) and Illumina Genome Network (IGN) to create a world-wide
network of Illumina technology-enabled service offerings that
broaden our market reach. Illumina CSPro is a collaborative
service partnership established between Illumina and leading
genome centers and research laboratories to ensure the delivery
of high-quality genetic analysis services. It provides a
competitive advantage for service providers, while also ensuring
that customers will receive Illumina data quality and service.
To become a CSPro provider, participating laboratories must
complete an Illumina certification process and undergo
recertification on an annual basis. There are over 50 Illumina
CSPro-certified organizations worldwide providing sequencing,
genotyping, and gene expression services using our technologies
and products.
Introduced in July 2010, the IGN links researchers interested in
conducting large whole genome sequencing projects with leading
institutes worldwide that possess our next-generation sequencing
technology. IGN provides a cost-effective and dependable way to
complete large sequencing projects. The genome sequencing
service network comprises CSPro-certified academic and
commercial organizations possessing 10 or more HiSeq 2000 or
Genome Analyzer systems and committed to providing
industry-leading turnaround times of as few as 12 weeks for
50 samples. Current members include the National Center for
Genome Resources (NCGR) in Santa Fe, New Mexico and the
Macrogen Genomic Medicine Institute in Seoul, Korea.
Individual
Genome Sequencing
Introduced in June 2009, Illuminas Individual Genome
Sequencing Service provides personal genome sequencing for
consumers. It is performed in our CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited
laboratory using our next-generation sequencing technology. The
service is built around physician-patient consultation, with a
physicians order required to initiate the process. The
offering includes sequencing of an individuals DNA to
30-times depth, providing information on SNP variation and other
structural characteristics of the genome such as insertions,
deletions, and rearrangements. We are collaborating with a
number of partners to provide secondary data analysis such as
calculation of disease risk, ancestry, and information on traits
of interest. The service requires individuals to follow our
physician-mediated process, which involves pre-service
consultation, patient consent, and a
seven-day
cooling off period during which the patient may
withdraw consent. The final genome data is returned to the
physician, who in turn delivers it to the consumer.
Intellectual
Property
We have an extensive intellectual property portfolio, including,
as of February 1, 2011, ownership of, or exclusive licenses
to, 214 issued U.S. patents and 197 pending
U.S. patent applications, including seven allowed
applications that have not yet issued as patents. Our issued
patents include those directed to various aspects of our arrays,
assays, oligo synthesis, sequencing technology, instruments, and
chemical detection technologies, and have terms that expire
between 2011 and 2029. We continue to file new patent
applications to protect the full range of our technologies. We
have filed or have been granted counterparts for many of these
patents and applications in foreign countries.
We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, copyright, and
trademark protection, as well as continuing technological
innovation and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain
our competitive position. Our success will depend in part on our
ability to obtain patent protection for our products and
processes, to preserve our trade secrets, to enforce our
patents, copyrights and trademarks, to operate without
infringing the proprietary rights of third parties, and to
acquire licenses related to enabling technology or products.
13
We are party to various exclusive and non-exclusive license
agreements and other arrangements with third parties that grant
us rights to use key aspects of our array and sequencing
technologies, assay methods, chemical detection methods, reagent
kits, and scanning equipment. We have exclusive licenses from
Tufts University to patents that are directed to our BeadArray
technology. These patents were filed by Dr. David Walt, who
is a member of our board of directors, the Chairman of our
Scientific Advisory Board, and one of our founders. Our
exclusive licenses expire with the termination of the underlying
patents, which will occur between 2011 and 2020. We have
additional nonexclusive license agreements with various third
parties for other components of our products. In most cases, the
agreements remain in effect over the term of the underlying
patents, may be terminated at our request without further
obligation, and require that we pay customary royalties while
the agreement is in effect.
Research
and Development
We have made substantial investments in research and development
since our inception. We have assembled a team of skilled
scientists and engineers who are specialists in biology,
chemistry, informatics, instrumentation, optical systems,
software, manufacturing, and other related areas required to
complete the development of our products. Our research and
development efforts have focused primarily on the tasks required
to optimize our sequencing, BeadArray, VeraCode, and oligo
synthesis technologies and to support commercialization of the
products and services derived from these technologies.
Our research and development expenses for 2010, 2009, and 2008
(inclusive of charges relating to share-based compensation of
$25.4 million, $20.0 million, and $14.1 million,
respectively) were $177.9 million, $140.6 million, and
$100.0 million, respectively. We expect research and
development expense to increase during 2011 as we continue to
expand our research and product development efforts.
Marketing
and Distribution
Our current products address the genetic analysis portion of the
life sciences market, in particular, experiments involving
sequencing, SNP genotyping, and gene expression profiling. These
experiments may be involved in many areas of biologic research,
including basic human disease research, pharmaceutical drug
discovery and development, pharmacogenomics, toxicogenomics, and
animal and agricultural research. Our potential customers
include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions,
government laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as
well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, and
consumer genomics companies. The genetic analysis market is
relatively new and emerging and its size and speed of
development will ultimately be driven by, among other items:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of the research community to extract medically
valuable information from genomics and to apply that knowledge
to multiple areas of disease-related research and treatment;
|
|
|
|
the availability of sufficiently low cost, high-throughput
research tools to enable the large amount of experimentation
required to study genetic variation and biological
function; and
|
|
|
|
the availability of government and private industry funding to
perform the research required to extract medically relevant
information from genomic analysis.
|
We market and distribute our products directly to customers in
North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific
region. In each of these areas, we have dedicated sales,
service, and application support personnel responsible for
expanding and managing their respective customer bases. In
addition, in certain markets within Europe, the Asia-Pacific
region, Latin America, the Middle East, and South Africa we sell
our products and provide services to customers through
distributors that specialize in life science products. We expect
to continue to increase our sales and distribution resources
during 2011 and beyond as we launch a number of new products and
expand the number of customers that can use our products.
Manufacturing
We manufacture sequencing and array platforms, reagent kits,
scanning equipment, and oligos. Our manufacturing capacity for
consumables and instruments has grown during 2010 to support our
increased
14
customer demand. We are also focused on continuing to enhance
the quality and manufacturing yield of our BeadChips and flow
cells, in particular. To continue to increase throughput and
improve the quality and manufacturing yield as we increase the
complexity of our products, we are exploring ways to continue
increasing the level of automation in the manufacturing process.
We adhere to access and safety standards required by federal,
state, and local health ordinances, such as standards for the
use, handling, and disposal of hazardous substances.
Raw
Materials
Our manufacturing operations require a wide variety of raw
materials, electronic and mechanical components, chemical and
biochemical materials, and other supplies. We have multiple
commercial sources for many of our components and supplies;
however, there are some raw materials and components that we
obtain from single source suppliers. To mitigate potential risks
arising from single source suppliers, we believe that we can
redesign our products for alternative components or use
alternative reagents if required. In addition, while we
generally attempt to keep our inventory at minimal levels, we
purchase incremental inventory as circumstances warrant to
protect our supply chain.
Competition
Although we believe that our products and services provide
significant advantages over products and services currently
available from other sources, we expect to continue to encounter
intense competition from other companies that offer products and
services for sequencing, SNP genotyping, gene expression, and
molecular diagnostics markets. These include companies such as
Affymetrix, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.; Beckman Coulter,
Inc.; Complete Genomics, Inc.; Helicos BioSciences Corporation;
General Electric Company; Life Technologies Corporation; Luminex
Corporation; Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.; QIAGEN
N.V.; Roche Diagnostics Corp.; and Sequenom, Inc., among others.
Some of these companies have or will have substantially greater
financial, technical, research, and other resources and larger,
more established marketing, sales, distribution, and service
organizations than we do. In addition, they may have greater
name recognition than we do in the markets we address and in
some cases a larger installed base of systems. Each of these
markets is very competitive and we expect new competitors to
emerge and the intensity of competition to increase. In order to
effectively compete with these companies, we will need to
demonstrate that our products have superior throughput, cost,
and accuracy advantages over competing products.
Segment
and Geographic Information
We are organized in two business segments, Life Sciences and
Diagnostics. Our Life Sciences Business Unit includes all
products and services related to the research market, namely the
product lines based on our sequencing, BeadArray, VeraCode, and
real-time PCR technologies. Our Diagnostics Business Unit
focuses on the emerging opportunity in molecular diagnostics.
During all periods presented, our Diagnostics Business Unit had
limited activity. Accordingly, our operating results for both
units are reported on an aggregate basis as one operating
segment. We will begin reporting in two segments once revenues,
operating profit or loss, or assets of the Diagnostics Business
Unit exceed 10% of the consolidated amounts.
We currently sell our products to a number of customers outside
the United States, including customers in other areas of North
America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Shipments to
customers outside the United States totaled
$403.8 million, or 45% of our total revenue, during 2010,
compared to $319.1 million, or 48%, and
$293.2 million, or 51%, in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Sales to customers outside of the United States were
generally denominated in U.S. dollars. In 2008, we
reorganized our international structure to establish more
efficient channels among product development, product
manufacturing, and sales. The reorganization increased our
foreign subsidiaries anticipated dependence on the
U.S. entity for management decisions, financial support,
production assets, and inventory thereby making the foreign
subsidiaries more of a direct and integral component of the
U.S. entitys operations. As a result, we reassessed
the primary economic environment of our foreign subsidiaries and
determined the subsidiaries are more U.S. dollar based,
resulting in a U.S. dollar functional currency
determination. We expect that sales to international customers
will continue to be an important and growing source of revenue.
See note 13. Segment Information,
15
Geographic Data, and Significant Customers in
Part II, Item 8, of this
Form 10-K
for further information concerning our foreign and domestic
operations.
Backlog
Our backlog was $299.0 million and $227.6 million at
January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively.
Generally, our backlog consists of orders believed to be firm as
of the balance sheet date; however, we may allow customers to
make product substitutions as we launch new products. The timing
of shipments depends on several factors, including agreed upon
shipping schedules, which may span multiple quarters, and
whether the product is catalog or custom. We expect an estimated
90% of the backlog as of January 2, 2011 to be shipped
within the fiscal year ending January 1, 2012. Although we
generally recognize revenue upon the transfer of title to a
customer, we may be required to defer the recognition of revenue
even after title transfer depending on the specific arrangement
with a customer and the applicable accounting treatment. A
material portion of our backlog at January 2, 2011 is
associated with a large order we received from one customer at
the end of 2009 for which we are using operating lease
accounting that requires us to recognize revenue over a period
of three years with the majority of that revenue recognized in
2011 and 2012.
Seasonality
Historically, customer purchasing patterns have not shown
significant seasonal variation, although demand for our products
is usually lowest in the first quarter of the calendar year and
highest in the third quarter of the calendar year as a result,
in part, of U.S. academic customers spending unused budget
allocations before the end of the U.S. governments
fiscal year on September 30 of each year.
Environmental
Matters
We are committed to the protection of our employees and the
environment. Our operations require the use of hazardous
materials that subject us to a variety of federal, state, and
local environmental and safety laws and regulations. We believe
we are in material compliance with current applicable laws and
regulations; however, we could be held liable for damages and
fines should contamination of the environment or individual
exposures to hazardous substances occur. In addition, we cannot
predict how changes in these laws and regulations, or the
development of new laws and regulations, will affect our
business operations or the cost of compliance.
Government
Regulation
Our products are not currently subject to FDA clearance or
approval if they are not intended to be used for the diagnosis
of disease. However, as we expand our product line to encompass
products that are intended to be used for the diagnosis of
disease, such as molecular diagnostic products, regulation by
governmental authorities in the United States and other
countries will be a significant factor in the development,
testing, production, and marketing of such products. Products
that we develop in the molecular diagnostic markets, depending
on their intended use, will be regulated as medical devices by
the FDA and comparable agencies of other countries and may
require either receiving clearance following a pre-market
notification process, also known as a 510(k) clearance, or
premarket approval (PMA), from the FDA prior to marketing.
Obtaining the requisite regulatory approvals can be expensive
and may involve considerable delay.
The shorter 510(k) clearance process, which generally takes from
three to six months after submission, but can take significantly
longer, may be utilized if it is demonstrated that the new
product is substantially equivalent to a similar
product that has already been cleared by the FDA. The longer PMA
process is much more costly, uncertain, and generally takes from
nine months to two years after filing. Because we cannot ensure
that any molecular diagnostic products that we develop will be
subject to the shorter 510(k) clearance process, or will
ultimately be approved at all, the regulatory approval process
for such products may be significantly delayed and may be
significantly more expensive than anticipated. If we fail to
obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining,
regulatory approvals for molecular diagnostic products that we
16
develop, we may not be able to launch or successfully
commercialize such products in a timely manner, or at all.
Changes to the current regulatory framework, including the
imposition of additional or new regulations, could arise at any
time during the development or marketing of our products, which
may negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain FDA or
comparable regulatory approval of our products, if required.
In addition, the regulatory approval or clearance process
required to manufacture, market, and sell our existing and
future products that are intended for, and marketed and labeled
as, Research Use Only, or RUO, is uncertain if such
products are used or could be used, even without our consent,
for the diagnosis of disease. If the FDA or other regulatory
authorities assert that any of our RUO products are subject to
regulatory clearance or approval, our business, financial
condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Employees
As of January 2, 2011, we had approximately
2,100 employees. None of our employees is represented by a
labor union. We consider our employee relations to be positive.
Our success will depend in large part upon our ability to
attract and retain employees. In addition, we employ a number of
temporary and contract employees. We face competition in this
regard from other companies, research and academic institutions,
government entities, and other organizations.
Our business is subject to various risks, including those
described below. In addition to the other information included
in this
Form 10-K,
the following issues could adversely affect our operating
results or our stock price.
We
face intense competition, which could render our products
obsolete, result in significant price reductions, or
substantially limit the volume of products that we
sell.
We compete with life sciences companies that design,
manufacture, and market products for analysis of genetic
variation and biological function and other applications using a
wide-range of competing technologies. We anticipate that we will
continue to face increased competition as existing companies
develop new or improved products and as new companies enter the
market with new technologies. One or more of our competitors may
render our technology obsolete or uneconomical. Some of our
competitors have greater financial and personnel resources,
broader product lines, a more established customer base, and
more experience in research and development than we do.
Furthermore, life sciences and pharmaceutical companies, which
are our potential customers and strategic partners, could also
develop competing products. We believe that customers in our
markets display a significant amount of loyalty to their initial
supplier of a particular product; therefore, it may be difficult
to generate sales to potential customers who have purchased
products from competitors. To the extent we are unable to be the
first to develop or supply new products, our competitive
position may suffer.
The market for molecular diagnostics products is currently
limited and highly competitive, with several large companies
already having significant market share, intellectual property
portfolios, and regulatory expertise. Established diagnostic
companies also have an installed base of instruments in several
markets, including clinical and reference laboratories, which
could deter acceptance of our products. In addition, some of
these companies have formed alliances with genomics companies
that provide them access to genetic information that may be
incorporated into their diagnostic tests.
Our
success depends upon the continued emergence and growth of
markets for analysis of genetic variation and biological
function.
We design our products primarily for applications in the life
sciences, agricultural, and pharmaceutical industries. The
usefulness of our technologies depends in part upon the
availability of genetic data and its usefulness in identifying
or treating disease. We are focusing on markets for analysis of
genetic variation and
17
biological function, namely sequencing, genotyping, and gene
expression profiling. These markets are new and emerging, and
they may not develop as quickly as we anticipate, or reach their
full potential. Other methods of analysis of genetic variation
and biological function may emerge and displace the methods we
are developing. Also, researchers may not be able to
successfully analyze raw genetic data or be able to convert raw
genetic data into medically valuable information. For instance,
demand for our microarray products may be adversely affected if
researchers fail to find meaningful correlations between genetic
variation, such as SNPs, and disease susceptibility through
genome wide association studies. In addition, factors affecting
research and development spending generally, such as changes in
the regulatory environment affecting life sciences and
pharmaceutical companies, and changes in government programs
that provide funding to companies and research institutions,
could harm our business. If useful genetic data is not available
or if our target markets do not develop in a timely manner,
demand for our products may grow at a slower rate than we
expect, and we may not be able to sustain profitability.
If the
quality of our products does not meet our customers
expectations, then our reputation could suffer and ultimately
our sales and operating earnings could be negatively
impacted.
In the course of conducting our business, we must adequately
address quality issues associated with our products and
services, including defects in our engineering, design, and
manufacturing processes, as well as defects in third-party
components included in our products. Because our instruments and
consumables are highly complex, the occurrence of defects may
increase as we continue to introduce new products and services
and as we rapidly scale up manufacturing to meet increased
demand for our products and services. Although we have
established internal procedures to minimize risks that may arise
from product quality issues, there can be no assurance that we
will be able to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these
issues and associated liabilities. In addition, identifying the
root cause of quality issues, particularly those affecting
reagents and third-party components, may be difficult, which
increases the time needed to address quality issues as they
arise and increases the risk that similar problems could recur.
Finding solutions to quality issues can be expensive and we may
incur significant costs or lost revenue in connection with, for
example, shipment holds, product recalls, and warranty or other
service obligations. In addition, quality issues can impair our
relationships with new or existing customers and adversely
affect our brand image, and our reputation as a producer of high
quality products could suffer, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our
continued growth is dependent on continuously developing and
commercializing new products.
Our target markets are characterized by rapid technological
change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs,
existing and emerging competition, strong price competition, and
frequent new product introductions. Accordingly, our continued
growth depends on continuously developing and commercializing
new products and services, including improving our existing
products and services, in order to address evolving market
requirements on a timely basis. If we fail to innovate or
adequately invest in new technologies, our products and services
will become dated, and we could lose our competitive position in
the markets that we serve as customers purchase new products
offered by our competitors. We believe that successfully
introducing new products and technologies in our target markets
on a timely basis provides a significant competitive advantage
because customers make an investment of time in selecting and
learning to use a new product and may be reluctant to switch
once that selection is made.
To the extent that we fail to introduce new and innovative
products, or such products are not accepted in the market or
suffer significant delays in development, we may lose market
share to our competitors, which will be difficult or impossible
to regain. An inability, for technological or other reasons, to
successfully develop and introduce new products could reduce our
growth rate or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.
In the past, we have experienced, and are likely to experience
in the future, delays in the development and introduction of new
products. We cannot ensure that we will keep pace with the rapid
rate of change in our markets or that our new products will
adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace,
18
achieve market acceptance, or compete successfully with
competing technologies. Some of the factors affecting market
acceptance of new products and services include:
|
|
|
|
|
availability, quality, and price relative to competing products
and services;
|
|
|
|
the functionality and performance of new and existing products
and services;
|
|
|
|
the timing of introduction of the new product or service
relative to competing products and services;
|
|
|
|
scientists and customers opinions of the utility of
the new product or service;
|
|
|
|
citation of the new product or service in published research;
|
|
|
|
regulatory trends and approvals; and
|
|
|
|
general trends in life sciences research and applied markets.
|
We may also have to write off excess or obsolete inventory if
sales of our products are not consistent with our expectations
or the market requirements for our products change due to
technical innovations in the marketplace.
If we
do not successfully manage the development and launch of new
products or services, including product transitions, our
financial results could be adversely affected.
We face risks associated with launching new products and
pre-announcing products and services when the products or
services have not been fully developed or tested. If our
products and services are not able to deliver the performance or
results expected by our target markets or are not delivered on a
timely basis, our reputation and credibility may suffer. If we
encounter development challenges or discover errors in our
products late in our development cycle, we may delay our product
launch date. In addition, we may experience difficulty in
managing or forecasting customer reactions, purchasing
decisions, or transition requirements or programs (such as
trade-in programs) with respect to newly launched products (or
products in development) relative to our existing products,
which could adversely affect sales of our existing products. The
expenses or losses associated with unsuccessful product
development or launch activities or lack of market acceptance of
our new products could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
Reduction
or delay in research and development budgets and government
funding may adversely affect our revenue.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from genomic
research centers, academic institutions, government
laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as well as
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, and consumer
genomics companies, and their capital spending budgets can have
a significant effect on the demand for our products and
services. These budgets are based on a wide variety of factors,
including the allocation of available resources to make
purchases, funding from government sources, the spending
priorities among various types of research equipment, and
policies regarding capital expenditures during recessionary
periods. Any decrease in capital spending or change in spending
priorities of our customers could significantly reduce our
revenue. Moreover, we have no control over the timing and amount
of purchases by our customers, and as a result, revenue from
these sources may vary significantly due to factors that can be
difficult to forecast. Any delay or reduction in purchases by
our customers or our inability to forecast fluctuations in
demand could harm our future operating results.
We
depend on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for components
and materials used in our products, and if shipments from these
manufacturers or suppliers are delayed or interrupted, or if the
quality of the components or materials supplied do not meet our
requirements, we may not be able to launch, manufacture, or ship
our products in a timely manner, or at all.
The complex nature of our products requires customized,
precision-manufactured, components and materials that currently
are available from a limited number of sources, and, in the case
of some components
19
and materials, from only a single source. If deliveries from
these vendors are delayed or interrupted for any reason, or if
we are otherwise unable to secure a sufficient supply, we may
not be able to obtain these components or materials timely or in
sufficient quantities or qualities, or at all, in order to meet
demand for our products. We may need to enter into contractual
relationships with manufacturers for commercial-scale production
of some of our products, or develop these capabilities
internally, and we cannot ensure that we will be able to do this
on a timely basis, in sufficient quantities, or on commercially
reasonable terms. In addition, the lead time needed to establish
a relationship with a new supplier can be lengthy, and we may
experience delays in meeting demand in the event we must switch
to a new supplier. The time and effort required to qualify a new
supplier could result in additional costs, diversion of
resources, or reduced manufacturing yields, any of which would
negatively impact our operating results. Accordingly, we may not
be able to establish or maintain reliable, high-volume
manufacturing at commercially reasonable costs or at all. In
addition, the manufacture or shipment of our products may be
delayed or interrupted if the quality of the components or
materials supplied by our vendors does not meet our
requirements. Any delay or interruption to our manufacturing
process or in shipping our products could result in lost
revenue, which would adversely affect our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
If we
are unable to increase our manufacturing capacity and develop
and maintain operation of our manufacturing capability, we may
not be able to launch or support our products in a timely
manner, or at all.
We continue to rapidly increase our manufacturing capacity to
meet the anticipated demand for our products. Although we have
significantly increased our manufacturing capacity and we
believe we have plans in place sufficient to ensure we have
adequate capacity to meet our business plan for 2011, there are
uncertainties inherent in expanding our manufacturing
capabilities, and we may not be able to sufficiently increase
our capacity in a timely manner. For example, manufacturing and
product quality issues may arise as we increase production rates
at our manufacturing facilities and launch new products. Also,
we may not manufacture the right product mix to meet customer
demand, especially as we introduce new products. As a result, we
may experience difficulties in meeting customer, collaborator,
and internal demand, in which case we could lose customers or be
required to delay new product introductions, and demand for our
products could decline. Additionally, in the past, we have
experienced variations in manufacturing conditions and quality
control issues that have temporarily reduced or suspended
production of certain products. Due to the intricate nature of
manufacturing complex instruments, consumables, and products
that contain DNA, we may encounter similar or previously unknown
manufacturing difficulties in the future that could
significantly reduce production yields, impact our ability to
launch or sell these products (or to produce them economically),
prevent us from achieving expected performance levels, or cause
us to set prices that hinder wide adoption by customers.
Additionally, we currently manufacture in a limited number of
locations. Our manufacturing facilities are located in
San Diego and Hayward, California; Singapore; and Little
Chesterford, United Kingdom. These areas are subject to
natural disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, or floods. If
a natural disaster were to damage one of our facilities
significantly or if other events were to cause our operations to
fail, we may be unable to manufacture our products, provide our
services, or develop new products.
Also, many of our manufacturing processes are automated and are
controlled by our custom-designed Laboratory Information
Management System (LIMS). Additionally, the decoding process in
our array manufacturing requires significant network and storage
infrastructure. If either our LIMS system or our networks or
storage infrastructure were to fail for an extended period of
time, it may adversely impact our ability to manufacture our
products on a timely basis and could prevent us from achieving
our expected shipments in any given period.
Our
acquisitions expose us to risks that could adversely affect our
business, and we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of
acquisitions of businesses or technologies.
As part of our strategy to develop and identify new products,
services, and technologies, we have made, and may continue to
make, acquisitions of technologies, products, or businesses.
Acquisitions involve
20
numerous risks and operational, financial, and managerial
challenges, including the following, any of which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results
of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating new operations, technologies,
products, and personnel;
|
|
|
|
lack of synergies or the inability to realize expected synergies
and cost-savings;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in managing geographically dispersed operations;
|
|
|
|
underperformance of any acquired technology, product, or
business relative to our expectations and the price we paid;
|
|
|
|
negative near-term impacts on financial results after an
acquisition, including acquisition-related earnings charges;
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees, customers, and strategic
partners of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
claims by terminated employees and shareholders of acquired
companies or other third parties related to the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the issuance of dilutive securities, assumption or incurrence of
additional debt obligations or expenses, or use of substantial
portions of our cash;
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention and company resources
from existing operations of the business;
|
|
|
|
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies;
|
|
|
|
the impairment of intangible assets as a result of technological
advancements, or
worse-than-expected
performance of acquired companies; and
|
|
|
|
assumption of, or exposure to, unknown contingent liabilities or
liabilities that are difficult to identify or accurately
quantify.
|
In addition, the successful integration of acquired businesses
requires significant efforts and expense across all operational
areas, including sales and marketing, research and development,
manufacturing, finance, legal, and information technologies. We
cannot ensure that any of the acquisitions we make will be
successful or will be, or will remain, profitable. Our failure
to successfully address the above risks may prevent us from
achieving the anticipated benefits from any acquisition in a
reasonable time frame, or at all.
The
timing and extent of funding provided by the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act) could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, or results of
operations.
The Recovery Act was enacted in February 2009 to provide
stimulus to the U.S. economy in the wake of the economic
downturn. As part of the Recovery Act legislation, over
$10 billion in funding was provided to the National
Institute of Health to support the advancement of scientific
research. A portion of the stimulus funding may support the
analysis of genetic variation and biological function and have a
significant positive impact on our business. If our customers
are unable to obtain stimulus money they may reduce their
research and development budgets resulting in a decrease in
demand for our products. In addition, it is unclear what will
happen to demand for our products after the stimulus funds from
the Recovery Act have been allocated and spent. A decline in
demand will reduce our revenues, which would adversely affect
our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Unfavorable
global economic conditions could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general
conditions in the global economy and in the global financial
markets. The recent global financial crisis caused extreme
volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets. A
severe or prolonged economic downturn, such as the recent global
financial crisis, could result in a variety of risks to our
business, including, in particular, reductions or delays in
planned improvements to healthcare systems, research and
development funding, and purchases of our products and
21
services, or cost-containment efforts by governments and private
organizations that could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations. In addition, the
liquidity of our investment portfolio could be impaired such as
when more than $50 million of auction rate securities that
we held for investment became illiquid in February 2008 because
their scheduled auctions failed. Furthermore, as is the case for
almost any other business, we face the following risks from a
severe or prolonged economic downturn:
|
|
|
|
|
severely limited access to financing over an extended period of
time, which may limit our ability to fund our growth strategy,
could result in a need to delay capital expenditures,
acquisitions, or research and development projects;
|
|
|
|
losses from our investment portfolio or to a counterpartys
inability to fulfill its payment obligations;
|
|
|
|
inability to refinance existing debt at competitive rates,
reasonable terms, or sufficient amounts; and
|
|
|
|
increased volatility or adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates.
|
In addition, certain of our customers may face challenges
gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could result
in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us.
If that were to occur, our allowance for doubtful accounts and
our days sales outstanding could increase. Additionally, these
economic conditions may cause our smaller suppliers to be unable
to supply in a timely manner sufficient quantities of customized
components, which would impair our ability to manufacture on
schedule and at commercially reasonable costs. Suppliers may
also extend lead times, limit supplies, or increase prices due
to capacity constraints or other factors.
An
inability to manage our growth or the expansion of our
operations could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
Our business has grown rapidly, with total revenues increasing
from $73.5 million for the year ended January 1, 2006
to $902.7 million for the year ended January 2, 2011
and with the number of employees increasing from approximately
375 to approximately 2,100 during the same period. We expect to
continue to experience rapid and substantial growth in order to
achieve our operating plans. The rapid expansion of our business
and addition of new personnel may place a strain on our
management and operational systems. Our ability to effectively
manage our operations and growth requires us to continue to
expend funds to enhance our operational, financial, and
management controls, reporting systems, and procedures and to
attract and retain sufficient numbers of talented employees on a
global basis. If we are unable to
scale-up and
implement improvements to our manufacturing process and control
systems in an efficient or timely manner, or if we encounter
deficiencies in existing systems and controls, then we will not
be able to make available the products required to successfully
commercialize our technology. Our future operating results will
depend on the ability of our management to continue to implement
and improve our research, product development, manufacturing,
sales and marketing, and customer support programs, enhance our
operational and financial control systems, expand, train, and
manage our employee base, integrate acquired businesses, and
effectively address new issues related to our growth as they
arise. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage
our recent or any future expansion or acquisition successfully,
and any inability to do so could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
If we
lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain
additional personnel, we may be unable to achieve our
goals.
We are highly dependent on our management and scientific
personnel, including Jay Flatley, our President and Chief
Executive Officer. The loss of their services could adversely
impact our ability to achieve our business objectives. In
addition, we will need to hire additional qualified personnel
with expertise in molecular biology, chemistry, biological
information processing, sales, marketing, and technical support.
We compete for qualified management and scientific personnel
with other life science companies, universities, and research
institutions, particularly those focusing on genomics.
Competition for these individuals, particularly in the
San Diego and San Francisco area, is intense, and the
turnover rate can be high. Failure to attract and retain
management and scientific personnel would prevent us from
pursuing collaborations or developing our
22
products or technologies. Additionally, integration of acquired
companies and businesses can be disruptive, causing key
employees of the acquired business to leave. Further, we use
stock options and restricted stock units to provide incentives
for our key personnel to remain with us and to align their
interests with those of the Company by building long-term
stockholder value. If our stock price decreases, the value of
these equity awards decreases and therefore reduces a key
employees incentive to stay.
Any
inability to effectively protect our proprietary technologies
could harm our competitive position.
Our success depends to a large extent on our ability to develop
proprietary products and technologies and to obtain patents and
maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property in the
United States and other countries. If we do not protect our
intellectual property adequately, competitors may be able to use
our technologies and thereby erode our competitive advantage.
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary
rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and
many companies have encountered significant challenges in
establishing and enforcing their proprietary rights outside of
the United States. These challenges can be caused by the absence
of rules and methods for the establishment and enforcement of
intellectual property rights outside of the United States.
The patent positions of companies developing tools for the life
sciences, agricultural, and pharmaceutical industries, including
our patent position, generally are uncertain and involve complex
legal and factual questions. We will be able to protect our
proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only
to the extent that our proprietary technologies are covered by
valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as
trade secrets. In addition, certain patent applications in the
United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents
issue, and publication of discoveries in the scientific or
patent literature tend to lag behind actual discoveries by
several months. We intend to apply for patents covering our
technologies and products as we deem appropriate. However, our
patent applications may be challenged and may not result in
issued patents or may be invalidated or narrowed in scope after
they are issued. Questions as to inventorship or ownership may
also arise. Any finding that our patents or applications are
unenforceable could harm our ability to prevent others from
practicing the related technology, and a finding that others
have inventorship or ownership rights to our patents and
applications could require us to obtain certain rights to
practice related technologies, which may not be available on
favorable terms, if at all. Furthermore, as issued patents
expire, we may lose some competitive advantage as others develop
competing products, and, as a result, we may lose revenue.
In addition, our existing patents and any future patents we
obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from
practicing our technologies or from developing competing
products. There is also the risk that others may independently
develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our
patented technologies. Also, our patents may fail to provide us
with any competitive advantage. We may need to initiate lawsuits
to protect or enforce our patents, or litigate against third
party claims, which would be expensive, and, if we lose, may
cause us to lose some of our intellectual property rights and
reduce our ability to compete in the marketplace. Furthermore,
these lawsuits may divert the attention of our management and
technical personnel.
We also rely upon trade secrets and proprietary know-how
protection for our confidential and proprietary information, and
we have taken security measures to protect this information.
These measures, however, may not provide adequate protection for
our trade secrets, know-how, or other confidential information.
Among other things, we seek to protect our trade secrets and
confidential information by entering into confidentiality
agreements with employees, collaborators, and consultants. There
can be no assurance that any confidentiality agreements that we
have with our employees, collaborators, and consultants will
provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and
confidential information or will provide adequate remedies in
the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.
Accordingly, there also can be no assurance that our trade
secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently
developed by competitors.
23
Litigation,
other proceedings, or third party claims of intellectual
property infringement could require us to spend significant time
and money and could prevent us from selling our products or
services.
Our success depends, in part, on our non-infringement of the
patents or proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties
have asserted and may in the future assert that we are employing
their proprietary technology without authorization. As we enter
new markets, we expect that competitors will likely claim that
our products infringe their intellectual property rights as part
of a business strategy to impede our successful entry into those
markets. In addition, third parties may have obtained and may in
the future obtain patents allowing them to claim that the use of
our technologies infringes these patents. We could incur
substantial costs and divert the attention of our management and
technical personnel in defending ourselves against any of these
claims. Any adverse ruling or perception of an adverse ruling in
defending ourselves against these claims could have an adverse
impact on our stock price, which may be disproportionate to the
actual import of the ruling itself. Furthermore, parties making
claims against us may be able to obtain injunctive or other
relief, which effectively could block our ability to develop
further, commercialize, or sell products or services, and could
result in the award of substantial damages against us. In the
event of a successful infringement claim against us, we may be
required to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from
third parties, or be prohibited from selling certain products or
services. In addition, we may be unable to obtain these licenses
at a reasonable cost, if at all. We could therefore incur
substantial costs related to royalty payments for licenses
obtained from third parties, which could negatively affect our
gross margins. In addition, we could encounter delays in product
introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or
products. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of
these licenses on favorable terms could prevent us from
commercializing products, and the prohibition of sale of any of
our products or services could adversely affect our ability to
grow or maintain profitability.
Doing
business internationally creates operational and financial risks
for our business.
Conducting and launching operations on an international scale
requires close coordination of activities across multiple
jurisdictions and time zones and consumes significant management
resources. If we fail to coordinate and manage these activities
effectively, including the risks noted below, our business,
financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely
affected. We are focused on expanding our international
operations in key markets. We have sales offices located
internationally throughout Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and
Brazil as well as manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom
and Singapore. During 2010, the majority of our sales to
international customers and purchases of raw materials from
international suppliers were denominated in U.S. dollars.
Shipments to customers outside the United States comprised 45%,
48%, and 51% of our total revenue for the years ended
January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008, respectively. We intend to continue to
expand our international presence by selling to customers
located outside of the United States and we expect the total
amount of
non-U.S. sales
to continue to grow.
International sales entail a variety of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts
receivable outside of the United States;
|
|
|
|
longer sales cycles due to the volume of transactions taking
place through public tenders;
|
|
|
|
currency exchange fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
challenges in staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in legislative or regulatory requirements of
foreign countries into which we sell our products;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining export licenses or in overcoming other
trade barriers and restrictions resulting in delivery
delays; and
|
|
|
|
significant taxes or other burdens of complying with a variety
of foreign laws.
|
24
Changes in the value of the relevant currencies may affect the
cost of certain items required in our operations. Changes in
currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at
which we are able sell products in the same market. Our revenues
from international customers may be negatively impacted as
increases in the U.S. dollar relative to our international
customers local currency could make our products more expensive,
impacting our ability to compete. Our costs of materials from
international suppliers may increase if in order to continue
doing business with us they raise their prices as the value of
the U.S. dollar decreases relative to their local currency.
Foreign policies and actions regarding currency valuation could
result in actions by the United States and other countries to
offset the effects of such fluctuations. The recent global
financial downturn has led to a high level of volatility in
foreign currency exchange rates and that level of volatility may
continue, which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
We are
subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions
and the possible loss of the tax deduction on our outstanding
convertible notes.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and
numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments based on
interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations are required
in determining the provision for income taxes. Our effective
income tax rate could be adversely affected by various factors,
including, but not limited to, changes in the mix of earnings in
tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates, changes in
the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in
existing tax laws or tax rates, changes in the level of
non-deductible expenses (including share-based compensation),
changes in our future levels of research and development
spending, mergers and acquisitions, or the result of
examinations by various tax authorities. Although we believe our
tax estimates are reasonable, if the IRS or other taxing
authority disagrees with the positions taken by the Company on
its tax returns, we could have additional tax liability,
including interest and penalties. If material, payment of such
additional amounts upon final adjudication of any disputes could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
In addition, we could lose some or all of the tax deduction for
interest expense associated with our $390 million aggregate
principal amount of convertible notes due in 2014 if these notes
are not subject to the special Treasury Regulations governing
contingent payment debt instruments, the notes are converted, or
we invest in non-taxable investments.
Our
products, if used for the diagnosis of disease, could be subject
to government regulation, and the regulatory approval and
maintenance process for such products may be expensive,
time-consuming, and uncertain both in timing and in
outcome.
Our products are not currently subject to FDA clearance or
approval if they are not intended to be used for the diagnosis
of disease. However, as we expand our product line to encompass
products that are intended to be used for the diagnosis of
disease, certain of our products are likely to become subject to
regulation by the FDA, or comparable agencies of other
countries, including requirements for regulatory approval of
such products before they can be marketed. Such regulatory
approval processes or clearances may be expensive,
time-consuming, and uncertain, and our failure to obtain or
comply with such approvals and clearances could have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, or operating
results. In addition, changes to the current regulatory
framework, including the imposition of additional or new
regulations, could arise at any time during the development or
marketing of our products, which may negatively affect our
ability to obtain or maintain FDA or comparable regulatory
approval of our products, if required.
Molecular diagnostic products, in particular, depending on their
intended use, may be regulated as medical devices by the FDA and
comparable agencies of other countries and may require either
receiving clearance from the FDA following a pre-market
notification process or premarket approval from the FDA, in each
case prior to marketing. Obtaining the requisite regulatory
approvals can be expensive and may involve considerable delay.
If we fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in
obtaining, regulatory approvals for molecular diagnostic
products that we develop, we may not be able to launch or
successfully commercialize such products in a timely manner, or
at all.
25
In addition, the regulatory approval or clearance process
required to manufacture, market, and sell our existing and
future products that are intended for, and marketed and labeled
as, Research Use Only, or RUO, is uncertain if such
products are used or could be used, even without our consent,
for the diagnosis of disease. If the FDA or other regulatory
authorities assert that any of our RUO products are subject to
regulatory clearance or approval, our business, financial
condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our
operating results may vary significantly from period to period,
and we may not be able to sustain operating
profitability.
Our revenue is subject to fluctuations due to the timing of
sales of high-value products and services, the effects of new
product launches and related promotions, the impact of seasonal
spending patterns, the timing and size of research projects our
customers perform, the timing of our customers funding,
changes in overall spending levels in the life sciences
industry, and other unpredictable factors that may affect
customer ordering patterns. Given the difficulty in predicting
the timing and magnitude of sales for our products and services,
we may experience
quarter-to-quarter
fluctuations in revenue resulting in the potential for a
sequential decline in quarterly revenue. While we anticipate
future growth, there is some uncertainty as to the timing of
revenue recognition on a quarterly basis. This is because a
substantial portion of our quarterly revenue is typically
recognized in the last month of a quarter and because the
pattern for revenue generation during that month is normally not
linear, with a concentration of orders in the final week of the
quarter. In light of that, our revenue cut-off and recognition
procedures, together with our manufacturing and shipping
operations, may experience increased pressure and demand during
the time period shortly before the end of a fiscal quarter.
A large portion of our expenses is relatively fixed, including
expenses for facilities, equipment, and personnel. In addition,
we expect operating expenses to continue to increase
significantly in absolute dollars, and we expect that our
research and development and selling and marketing expenses will
increase at a higher rate in the future as a result of the
development and launch of new products. Accordingly, our ability
to sustain profitability will depend, in part, on the rate of
growth, if any, of our revenue and on the level of our expenses,
and if revenue does not grow as anticipated, we may not be able
to maintain annual or quarterly profitability. Any significant
delays in the commercial launch of our products, unfavorable
sales trends in our existing product lines, or impacts from the
other factors mentioned above, could adversely affect our future
revenue growth or cause a sequential decline in quarterly
revenue. In addition, non-cash share-based compensation expense
and expenses related to prior and future acquisitions are also
likely to continue to adversely affect our future profitability.
Due to the possibility of significant fluctuations in our
revenue and expenses, particularly from quarter to quarter, we
believe that quarterly comparisons of our operating results are
not a good indication of our future performance. If our
operating results fluctuate or do not meet the expectations of
stock market analysts and investors, our stock price could
decline.
From time to time, we receive large orders that have a
significant effect on our operating results in the period in
which the order is recognized as revenue. The timing of such
orders is difficult to predict, and the timing of revenue
recognition from such orders may affect period to period changes
in net sales. As a result, our operating results could vary
materially from quarter to quarter based on the receipt of such
orders and their ultimate recognition as revenue.
Changes
in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates,
and judgments by management related to complex accounting
matters could significantly affect our financial results or
financial condition.
Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting
pronouncements, implementation guidelines, and interpretations
with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our
business, such as revenue recognition, asset impairment and fair
value determinations, inventories, business combinations and
intangible asset valuations, and litigation, are highly complex
and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates, and
judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or
changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, or judgments could
significantly change our reported or expected financial
performance or financial condition.
26
Ethical,
legal, and social concerns related to the use of genetic
information could reduce demand for our products or
services.
Our products may be used to provide genetic information about
humans, agricultural crops, and other living organisms. The
information obtained from our products could be used in a
variety of applications, which may have underlying ethical,
legal, and social concerns regarding privacy and the appropriate
uses of the resulting information, including the genetic
engineering or modification of agricultural products or testing
genetic predisposition for certain medical conditions.
Governmental authorities could, for social or other purposes,
call for limits on or regulation of the use of genetic testing
or prohibit testing for genetic predisposition to certain
conditions, particularly for those that have no known cure.
Similarly, such concerns may lead individuals to refuse to use
genetics tests even if permissible. These and other ethical,
legal, and social concerns about genetic testing may limit
market acceptance of our technology for certain applications or
reduce the potential markets for our technology, either of which
could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
The
relocation of our corporate headquarters, which is expected to
begin in late 2011, could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, we entered into a lease
agreement for a new corporate headquarters to meet our current
and long-term expansion needs. We expect to begin relocating
most of our San Diego-based operations to this new facility
in late 2011. In addition to incurring a one-time non-cash
charge of approximately $30 million related to the
remaining lease obligations for our current corporate
headquarters, we expect to incur additional expenses associated
with the relocation itself. Although we expect to sublease our
current corporate headquarters, we will continue to be subject
to rent and lease obligations for our current facility through
October 2023. Additional risks associated with the relocation,
including, in particular, the relocation of oligo manufacturing
that currently takes place at our corporate headquarters, may
include delays in receiving necessary permits and approvals and
business disruption as complex manufacturing equipment is moved.
Our
strategic equity investments may result in losses.
We periodically make strategic equity investments in various
public and private companies with businesses or technologies
that may complement our business. The market values of these
strategic equity investments may fluctuate due to market
conditions and other conditions over which we have no control.
Other-than-temporary
declines in the market price and valuations of the securities
that we hold in other companies would require us to record
losses in proportion to our ownership interest. This could
result in future charges to our earnings. It is uncertain
whether or not we will realize any long-term benefits associated
with these strategic investments.
Conversion
of our outstanding convertible notes may result in
losses.
As of January 2, 2011, we had $390.0 million aggregate
principal amount of convertible notes outstanding. The notes are
convertible into cash, and if applicable, shares of our common
stock under certain circumstances, including trading price
conditions related to our common stock. If the trading price of
our common stock remains significantly above the conversion
price of $21.83 per share, we expect that noteholders will elect
to convert the notes. Upon conversion, we are required to record
a gain or loss for the difference between the fair value of the
notes to be extinguished and their corresponding net carrying
value. The fair value of the notes to be extinguished depends on
our current incremental borrowing rate. The net carrying value
of our notes has an implicit interest rate of 8.27%. If our
incremental borrowing rate at the time of conversion is lower
than the implied interest rate of the notes, we will record a
loss in our consolidated statement of income during the period
in which the notes are converted.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
27
The following chart summarizes the facilities we lease as of
January 2, 2011, including the location and size of each
principal facility, and their designated use. We believe our
facilities are adequate for our current and near-term needs, and
that we will be able to locate additional facilities as needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
Expiration Dates
|
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
|
314,000
|
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, Storage,
|
|
|
2011 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
Hayward, CA
|
|
|
109,000
|
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing and Administrative
|
|
|
2013 2014
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
61,000
|
|
|
Manufacturing and Administrative
|
|
|
2013 2015
|
|
Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
Distribution and Administrative
|
|
|
2011 2015
|
|
Little Chesterford, United Kingdom
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing and Administrative
|
|
|
2024
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
R&D, Manufacturing, Sales and Administrative
|
|
|
2011 2014
|
|
In December 2010, we agreed to lease a facility in
San Diego, California that will serve as our new corporate
headquarters, which includes facilities for research and
development and manufacturing. The lease covers existing
buildings with approximately 346,600 rentable square feet
and an additional building with approximately
123,400 rentable square feet to be built in the future. The
lease has an initial term of 20 years. We excluded this
lease from the table above as the lease will not commence until
the second half of 2011. We plan to relocate from our present
corporate headquarters to the new facility and expect the
transition to begin during the fourth quarter of 2011.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
From time to time, we are party to litigation and other legal
proceedings in the ordinary course, and incidental to the
conduct, of our business. While the results of any litigation or
other legal proceedings are uncertain, management does not
believe the ultimate resolution of any pending legal matters is
likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations.
28
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market
Information
Our common stock has been quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the symbol ILMN since July 28,
2000. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our
common stock. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal
periods indicated, the quarterly high and low sales prices per
share of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global
Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.90
|
|
|
$
|
29.76
|
|
|
$
|
38.95
|
|
|
$
|
23.29
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
45.72
|
|
|
|
36.70
|
|
|
|
39.92
|
|
|
|
33.17
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
50.93
|
|
|
|
41.15
|
|
|
|
41.56
|
|
|
|
30.73
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
66.59
|
|
|
|
47.70
|
|
|
|
44.07
|
|
|
|
25.59
|
|
Stock
Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder
returns on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with
the cumulative total stockholder returns on the NASDAQ Composite
Index and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index for the same period.
The graph assumes that $100 was invested on January 1, 2006
in our common stock and in each index and that all dividends
were reinvested. No cash dividends have been declared on our
common stock. Stockholder returns over the indicated period
should not be considered indicative of future stockholder
returns.
Holders
As of February 4, 2011 we had 348 record holders of our
common stock.
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention
to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition,
the indenture for our convertible senior notes due 2014, which
notes are convertible into
29
cash and, in certain circumstances, shares of our common stock,
requires us to increase the conversion rate applicable to the
notes if we pay any cash dividends.
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer
In July 2010, our board of directors authorized a
$200 million stock repurchase program, with
$100 million allocated to repurchasing our common stock
under a 10b5-1 plan over a 12 month period and
$100 million allocated to repurchasing our common stock at
managements discretion during open trading windows. The
following table summarizes shares repurchased pursuant to this
program during the quarter ended January 2, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share(1)
|
|
|
Programs(1)
|
|
|
the Programs(1)
|
|
|
October 4 October 31, 2010
|
|
|
160,517
|
|
|
$
|
49.84
|
|
|
|
160,517
|
|
|
$
|
176,002,121
|
|
November 1 November 28, 2010
|
|
|
139,738
|
|
|
|
57.25
|
|
|
|
139,738
|
|
|
|
168,002,146
|
|
November 29, 2010 January 2, 2011
|
|
|
188,747
|
|
|
|
63.58
|
|
|
|
188,747
|
|
|
|
156,002,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
489,002
|
|
|
$
|
57.86
|
|
|
|
489,002
|
|
|
$
|
156,002,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All shares purchased during the quarter ended January 2,
2011 were in connection with our stock repurchase programs
authorized by our board of directors in July 2010. All stock
repurchases were made under the 10b5-1 trading program. |
Sales of
Unregistered Securities
None during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data for each of our last five fiscal years during the
period ended January 2, 2011.
Statement
of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(52 weeks)
|
|
|
(53 weeks)
|
|
|
(52 weeks)
|
|
|
(52 weeks)
|
|
|
(52 weeks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
902,741
|
|
|
$
|
666,324
|
|
|
$
|
573,225
|
|
|
$
|
366,799
|
|
|
$
|
184,586
|
|
Income (loss) from operations(1),(2)
|
|
|
211,654
|
|
|
|
125,597
|
|
|
|
80,457
|
|
|
|
(301,201
|
)
|
|
|
37,812
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
124,891
|
|
|
|
72,281
|
|
|
|
39,416
|
|
|
|
(287,305
|
)
|
|
|
39,968
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
(2.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(2.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
123,581
|
|
|
|
123,154
|
|
|
|
116,855
|
|
|
|
108,308
|
|
|
|
89,002
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
143,433
|
|
|
|
137,096
|
|
|
|
133,607
|
|
|
|
108,308
|
|
|
|
97,508
|
|
30
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 28,
|
|
December 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments(2),(3),(4),(5)
|
|
$
|
894,289
|
|
|
$
|
693,527
|
|
|
$
|
640,075
|
|
|
$
|
386,082
|
|
|
$
|
130,804
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
723,881
|
|
|
|
540,354
|
|
|
|
483,113
|
|
|
|
397,040
|
|
|
|
159,950
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,839,113
|
|
|
|
1,429,937
|
|
|
|
1,327,171
|
|
|
|
929,981
|
|
|
|
300,584
|
|
Long-term debt, current portion(5)
|
|
|
311,609
|
|
|
|
290,202
|
|
|
|
276,889
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity(1),(2),(3),(4)
|
|
|
1,197,675
|
|
|
|
864,248
|
|
|
|
798,667
|
|
|
|
353,927
|
|
|
|
247,342
|
|
In addition to the following notes, see Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for
further information regarding our consolidated results of
operations and financial position for periods reported therein
and for known factors that will impact comparability of future
results.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The consolidated financial statements include results of
operations of acquired companies commencing on their respective
acquisition dates. As a result of prior acquisitions completed,
we recorded charges to write-off acquired in-process research
and development, or IPR&D, of $1.3 million,
$11.3 million, $24.7 million, and $303.4 million
during the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007,
respectively. See note 3. Acquisitions in
Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information. |
|
(2) |
|
For the year ended December 30, 2007, we recorded a
$54.0 million charge for the settlement of our litigation
with Affymetrix. In January 2008, we paid $90.0 million
related to the Affymetrix settlement. |
|
(3) |
|
In August 2008, a total of 8,050,000 shares were sold to
the public at a public offering price of $43.75 per share,
raising net proceeds to us of $342.7 million. See note
9. Stockholders Equity in Part II,
Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(4) |
|
For the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, we
repurchased 0.8 million, 6.1 million, 3.1 million
and 14.8 million shares, respectively, of common stock for
$44.0 million, $175.1 million, $70.8 million and
$251.6 million, respectively. See note 9.
Stockholders Equity in Part II, Item 8,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(5) |
|
In February 2007, we issued $400.0 million principal amount
of 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014. Due to the
convertibility feature, we classify the principal amount of the
notes as current in our consolidated balance sheet. See note
7. Convertible Senior Notes in Part II,
Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Certain statements set forth below constitute forward-looking
statements. See Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements for additional factors relating to such
statements, and see Risk Factors in Item 1A of
this report for a discussion of certain risk factors applicable
to our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Business
Overview
We are a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life
science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic
variation and function. Using our proprietary technologies, we
provide a comprehensive line of genetic analysis solutions, with
products and services that serve a broad range of highly
interconnected markets, including sequencing, genotyping, gene
expression, and molecular diagnostics. Our customers include
31
leading genomic research centers, academic institutions,
government laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as
well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrigenomics, and
consumer genomics companies.
Our broad portfolio of systems, consumables, and analysis tools
are designed to simplify genetic analysis. This portfolio
addresses the range of genomic complexity, price points, and
throughputs, enabling researchers to select the best solution
for their scientific challenge. In 2007, through our acquisition
of Solexa, Inc., we acquired our proprietary sequencing by
synthesis (SBS) technology that is at the heart of our
leading-edge sequencing instruments. These systems can be used
to efficiently perform a range of nucleic acid (DNA, RNA)
analyses on large numbers of samples. For more focused studies,
our array-based solutions provide ideal tools to perform
genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving
single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and copy number
variation (CNV) analyses, as well as gene expression profiling
and other DNA, RNA, and protein studies. To further enhance our
genetic analysis workflows, in January 2011 we acquired
Epicentre Technologies Corporation, a leading provider of
nucleic acid sample preparation reagents and specialty enzymes
for sequencing and microarray applications. In 2010, through our
acquisition of Helixis, Inc., we expanded our portfolio to
include real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), one of the
most widely used technologies in life sciences. Our new Eco
Real-Time PCR System provides researchers with an affordable,
full-featured system to perform targeted validation studies.
We are organized in two business segments, the Life Sciences
Business Unit and the Diagnostics Business Unit. During 2010,
our Diagnostics Business Unit had limited business activity and,
accordingly, operating results are reported on an aggregate
basis as one operating segment. At each reporting period end, we
reassess our reportable operating segments, particularly as we
continue to develop our molecular diagnostics business.
Our analysis presented below is organized to provide the
information we believe will be useful for understanding the
relevant trends going forward. However, this discussion should
be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto in Item 8 of this report.
Business
Trends and Outlook
Our financial results have been, and will continue to be,
impacted by several significant trends, which are described
below. While these trends are important to understanding and
evaluating our financial results, the other transactions,
events, and trends discussed in Risk Factors in
Item 1A of this report may also materially impact our
business operations and financial results.
Next-Generation
Sequencing
Growth in the sequencing market and enhancements in our product
portfolio continue to drive both sequencing instrument and
consumable sales. In Q1 2010, we began customer shipments of the
HiSeq 2000, our newest high-throughput next-generation
sequencing instrument. The HiSeq 2000 was developed over a
three-year period and is designed to provide ultra-high
sequencing throughput that will significantly lower the cost of
sequencing. As a result of the launch, a substantial number of
our customers who previously purchased the Genome Analyzer
sequencing system ordered the HiSeq 2000 to replace their
existing sequencer with this new system. As a result of strong
demand, both from customers who desired to trade-in their
existing Genome Analyzers and new customers who ordered the
HiSeq 2000, our manufacturing capacity was constrained
throughout all of 2010. During the year we significantly
increased our manufacturing capacity for the HiSeq 2000 to meet
growing demand. We now believe that we have increased our
capacity to the point where we can begin reducing our backlog
and fulfilling new orders in a more timely manner. Additionally,
in the first half of 2011, we expect to further enhance the
performance of the HiSeq 2000. We believe that these
enhancements will enable customers to sequence whole human
genomes for less than $5,000 in consumable costs. As we continue
to make improvements that reduce the cost of sequencing we
believe that more customers will use the HiSeq 2000, which
generates more revenue per instrument time than the Genome
Analyzer. We believe that this will increase our consumable
pull-through, which is a measure of the annual consumable
revenue generated from each instrument in the installed base.
32
In Q4 2011, we expect to begin volume customer shipments of our
recently announced MiSeq, a low-cost personal sequencing system
that we believe will provide individual researchers a platform
with rapid turnaround time, high accuracy, and streamlined
workflow. We believe the launch of the MiSeq will expand our
presence in the lower throughput sequencing market.
Microarrays
As a complement to advances in sequencing technology, we believe
microarrays offer a cheaper, faster, and more accurate
technology for use when genetic content is known. The
information content of microarrays is fixed and reproducible. As
such, microarrays provide repeatable, standardized assays for
certain subsets of nucleotide bases within the overall genome.
During 2010, microarray product sales increased as compared to
2009, led by:
|
|
|
|
|
the launch of the Omni 2.5, a four sample BeadChip enabling
interrogation of approximately 2.5 million markers per
sample;
|
|
|
|
growth in sales of focused content arrays primarily from use for
genetic screening in applied markets such as agriculture and
fine mapping for follow up to GWAS projects; and
|
|
|
|
the launch of the HiScanSQ, our instrument that integrates
next-generation sequencing with genotyping and gene expression
arrays.
|
As additional new rare variant content becomes available from
the 1000 Genomes Project, an international research effort
launched in 2008 to establish the most detailed catalog of human
genetic variation, we plan to launch a microarray that will
feature approximately five million markers per sample. We expect
to begin customer shipments of this product in mid-2011.
However, the launch of this product will depend on the timing of
the release of new content from the 1000 Genomes Project. We
believe new product introductions as new content becomes
available will continue to drive growth in the sales of our
microarray products.
American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery
Act)
The Recovery Act was enacted in February 2009 to provide
stimulus to the U.S. economy in the wake of the economic
downturn. As part of the Recovery Act legislation, over
$10.0 billion in funding was provided to the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) to support the advancement of
scientific research. While it is not possible to precisely
quantify the net impact of orders resulting from the Recovery
Act due to the uncertainty surrounding orders that would have
been received in absence of stimulus, we believe approximately
$70.4 million in orders during 2010 were directly related
to Recovery Act grants. We believe Recovery Act funds will
continue to be spent by our customers through 2012.
Gross
Margin
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenue (gross margin)
decreased during 2010 as compared to 2009 due to the effects of
discounts provided to customers on the sales of HiSeq 2000s
associated with promotional programs, including the Genome
Analyzer trade-in program, and lower margins on our newer
products, such as the HiSeq 2000. Over the course of 2011, we
expect our gross margin to improve as the Genome Analyzer
trade-in program is completed and sales of consumables, which
generally carry a higher gross margin than instruments, increase
as a percentage of total revenue. We also expect improved
manufacturing efficiency for the HiSeq 2000 to improve gross
margin in 2011.
Operating
Expense
We expect to incur additional operating costs to support the
expected growth in our business. We believe a substantial
investment in research and development is essential to remain
competitive and expand into additional markets. Accordingly, we
expect our research and development expenses to increase in
absolute dollars as we continue to expand our product base.
Selling, general and administrative expenses are also
33
expected to increase in absolute dollars as we invest in staff
and infrastructure to support top line growth and global
expansion.
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is dependent on the mix of
earnings in tax jurisdictions with different statutory tax rates
and the other factors discussed in the risk factor We are
subject to risks related to taxation in multiple jurisdictions
and the possible loss of the tax deduction on our outstanding
convertible notes in Item 1A of this
Form 10-K.
For 2011 and beyond, we anticipate increased earnings in higher
tax jurisdictions, which may adversely impact the provision for
income taxes.
Due to the expected utilization of the majority of our net
operating loss carryforwards and U.S. federal research and
development tax credit carryforwards, we anticipate significant
income tax payments in 2011 and beyond.
Results
of Operations
To enhance comparability, the following table sets forth audited
consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended
January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010 and December 28,
2008 stated as a percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
Service and other revenue
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Impairment of manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Comparison
of 2010 and 2009
Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday
closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or
14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31,
June 30, September 30, and December 31. The year
ended January 2, 2011 was 52 weeks and the year ended
January 3, 2010 was 53 weeks.
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
842,510
|
|
|
$
|
627,240
|
|
|
$
|
215,270
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Service and other revenue
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
|
39,084
|
|
|
|
21,147
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
902,741
|
|
|
$
|
666,324
|
|
|
$
|
236,417
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
601,540
|
|
|
$
|
453,875
|
|
|
$
|
147,665
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Total gross margin
|
|
|
66.6
|
%
|
|
|
68.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Product revenue consists primarily of revenue from the sale of
consumables and instruments.
Consumable revenue increased $113.7 million, or 29%, to
$505.0 million for 2010 compared to $391.3 million for
2009. Microarray consumable revenue, which constituted more than
half of our total consumable revenue, increased
$28.3 million primarily attributable to growth in sales of
our Infinium BeadChips, which constituted a majority of our
microarray consumable sales. Sales volume of our Infinium
BeadChip products increased on a per sample basis during 2010
compared to 2009. The average selling price per sample, however,
declined due to a change in product mix primarily attributable
to growth in sales of our focused content arrays and a number of
large sample volume purchase orders that incurred higher
discounts. Revenue from sequencing consumables increased
$85.4 million due to growth in the installed base of our
sequencing systems.
Revenue from the sale of instruments increased
$98.9 million, or 44%, to $324.6 million for 2010
compared to $225.7 million for 2009. Sequencing instrument
revenue increased $85.7 million. We experienced increases
in both the number of units sold and average selling prices per
unit for our sequencing systems during 2010 compared to 2009.
Unit growth was due to increased demand for next-generation
sequencing systems. The increase in average selling prices was
primarily attributable to the launch of the HiSeq 2000 in Q1
2010. Microarray instrument revenue increased $13.2 million
primarily attributable to strong demand for our HiScanSQ
instrument launched in 2010. The launch of this system resulted
in increases in both the number of units sold and average
selling prices per unit for our microarray instruments during
2010 compared to 2009.
The increase in service and other revenue, which includes
extended warranty contracts and genotyping and sequencing
services, was primarily attributable to an increase in extended
warranty contracts for our growing installed base of sequencing
systems.
Gross
Margin
The decrease in gross margin was primarily attributable to the
effect of discounts provided to customers on the sales of HiSeq
2000 associated with promotional programs, including the Genome
Analyzer trade-in program, and lower margins on our newer
products, such as the HiSeq 2000. See Revenue
Recognition in note 1. Organization and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in Part II,
Item 8, of this
Form 10-K
for additional information on the Genome Analyzer trade-in
program. The impact of the promotional programs was partially
offset by improved margins on sequencing consumables primarily
attributable to improved overhead absorption from increased
volumes and the benefit of decreased costs associated with
chemistry improvements.
35
Operating
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
177,947
|
|
|
$
|
140,616
|
|
|
$
|
37,331
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
220,990
|
|
|
|
176,337
|
|
|
|
44,653
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
|
|
(9,051
|
)
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
(20,376
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
$
|
389,886
|
|
|
$
|
328,278
|
|
|
$
|
61,608
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expenses was primarily
attributable to a $25.9 million increase in personnel
expenses, including salaries, non-cash share-based compensation,
and benefits, and an increase in other non-personnel expenses of
$13.3 million comprised mostly of lab and production
supplies expenses. These increases were primarily attributable
to investments in new product development and commercialization
along with projects to sustain and optimize our existing product
portfolio.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to a $31.8 million increase in
personnel expenses, including salaries, non-cash share-based
compensation, and benefits, associated with the growth of our
business, and an increase in outside service expenses of
$9.7 million comprised mostly of legal and marketing
expenses.
During 2010, acquisition related (gain) expense, net, includes a
gain of $10.4 million from a change in the fair value of
contingent consideration related to an acquisition, partially
offset by an acquired in-process research and development charge
of $1.3 million related to a milestone payment made to the
former shareholders of a company we acquired in 2008. During
2009, acquisition related (gain) expense, net, included acquired
in-process research and development charges of
$11.3 million related to milestone payments made to the
former shareholders of the company we acquired in 2008.
Other
Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
8,378
|
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
|
$
|
(2,651
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24,598
|
)
|
|
|
(23,718
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(10,055
|
)
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(11,272
|
)
|
|
|
(926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
(26,275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,803
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased despite an increase in our average
cash and investment balance due to an overall decline in
interest rates during 2010 compared to 2009. The increase in
interest expense was due to the amortization of the discount on
our convertible senior notes. The change in other (expense)
income, net, was primarily attributable to a $13.2 million
impairment charge recorded in Q4 2010 related to the impairment
of a cost-method investment and a related note receivable (see
note 5. Impairment in Part II, Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K
for additional information on this impairment) partially offset
by a $2.9 million gain recognized in Q2 2010 on the
acquisition of Helixis, Inc., which represented the difference
between the carrying value of our cost-method investment in
Helixis, Inc. prior to acquisition and the fair value of that
investment at the time of acquisition.
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
185,379
|
|
|
$
|
114,125
|
|
|
$
|
71,254
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
60,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,844
|
|
|
$
|
18,644
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily
attributable to the gain recorded on the change in the fair
value of contingent consideration related to our acquisition of
Helixis, Inc. that is excluded from taxable income and a
decrease in nondeductible acquired IPR&D recognized for
financial reporting purposes in 2010 as compared to 2009.
Comparison
of 2009 and 2008
Our fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest
to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending
the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30,
September 30, and December 31. The year ended
January 3, 2010 was 53 weeks and the year ended
December 28, 2008 was 52 weeks.
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
627,240
|
|
|
$
|
532,390
|
|
|
$
|
94,850
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Service and other revenue
|
|
|
39,084
|
|
|
|
40,835
|
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
666,324
|
|
|
$
|
573,225
|
|
|
$
|
93,099
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
453,875
|
|
|
$
|
353,094
|
|
|
$
|
100,781
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Total gross margin
|
|
|
68.1
|
%
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Product revenue consists primarily of revenue from the sale of
consumables and instruments.
Consumable revenue increased $57.6 million, or 17%, to
$391.3 million for 2009 compared to $333.7 million for
2008. Microarray consumable revenue, which constituted more than
half of our consumable revenue, declined $11.4 million
primarily attributable to lower sales of whole-genome genotyping
arrays partially offset by growth in focused content arrays. The
decline was driven by customers delaying the start of new GWAS
in anticipation of new and rare variant content from the 1000
Genome Project, order delays directly related to stimulus
funding under the Recovery Act, and the impact of reduced
foundation funding at a few key customers. Sales volume for our
Infinium BeadChip product lines, which constituted a majority of
our microarray consumable sales, was relatively flat on a sample
basis during 2009 compared to 2008. The average selling price
per sample, however, declined due to a change in product mix
attributable to growth in the sales of our focused content
arrays coupled with lower sales of whole-genome genotyping
arrays.
Revenue from sequencing consumables increased $68.9 million
driven by growth in the installed base of our Genome Analyzer
systems and the progression of customer labs ramping to
production scale. The increase was partially offset by a loss of
sales related to a quality issue affecting our paired-end
cluster kits that arose in September 2009 when some of our
larger sequencing customers began experiencing higher than
average error rates on the second read of their paired-end
analysis. During the fourth quarter, we began shipping
reformulated paired-end cluster kits at full capacity and
cleared the related shipping backlog.
Revenue from the sale of instruments increased
$40.0 million, or 22%, to $225.7 million for 2009
compared to $185.7 million for 2008 primarily due to a
$56.4 million increase in sales of our sequencing systems.
During 2009 as compared to 2008 units sold and average
selling prices increased for our Genome Analyzer systems, which
constituted a majority of sequencing instrument revenue. The
increase in units sold was driven by increased demand for
next-generation sequencing systems. The increase in average
selling prices was attributable to the product transition from
the Genome Analyzer I to the Genome Analyzer II in the
second quarter of 2008 and technological improvements leading to
the launch of the Genome Analyzer IIx in the second quarter of
2009. The increase in sequencing instrument revenue was
partially offset by a $16.4 million decrease in the sales
of our microarray systems, which declined primarily due to
customers delaying the start of new GWAS in anticipation of new
and rare variant content from the 1000 Genomes Project, order
delays directly related to stimulus funding under the Recovery
Act, and the impact of reduced foundation funding at a few key
customers.
37
Gross
Margin
The increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to lower
costs for our sequencing consumables and instrumentation, a
$4.1 million impairment charge recorded in 2008 for which
there was no similar charge recognized in 2009, and a
$3.8 million decrease in amortization expense. The gross
margin on sequencing consumables increased primarily due to
improved overhead absorption from increased volumes of
sequencing consumables and the benefit of decreased costs
associated with the reformulation of our sequencing kits
launched at the end of the third quarter of 2008. The gross
margin on sequencing instruments increased primarily due to
production efficiencies and reduced material costs coupled with
higher average selling prices.
Operating
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
140,616
|
|
|
$
|
99,963
|
|
|
$
|
40,653
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
176,337
|
|
|
|
148,014
|
|
|
|
28,323
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
(13,335
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
$
|
328,278
|
|
|
$
|
272,637
|
|
|
$
|
55,641
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development was primarily
attributable to a $22.9 million increase in
personnel-related expenses, including salaries, non-cash
share-based compensation and benefits, a $10.4 million
increase to non-personnel related expenses, and an increase in
outside services of $3.2 million attributable to consulting
fees. These increases were primarily related to the growth in
our efforts to optimize and commercialize our sequencing and
BeadArray technologies.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to an increase of $26.6 million in
personnel-related expenses associated with the growth of our
business, including salaries, non-cash share-based compensation,
and benefits.
During 2009 acquisition related (gain) expense, net, includes
IPR&D charges of $11.3 million related to milestone
payments made to the former shareholders of a company we
acquired in 2008. During 2008 acquisition related (gain)
expense, net, includes IPR&D charges of $24.7 million
as a result of the same acquisition.
Other
Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
|
$
|
12,519
|
|
|
$
|
(1,490
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(23,718
|
)
|
|
|
(22,210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,770
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,702
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased despite an increase in our average
cash and investment balance due to an overall decline in
interest rates during 2009 compared to 2008. Interest expense
increased due to the amortization of the discount on our
convertible senior notes. Other income (expense), net, decreased
due to a decrease of $1.5 million in gains on net foreign
currency transactions, which was partially offset by a gain of
$0.8 million on the conversion of a portion of our debt
during the first quarter of 2009.
38
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
114,125
|
|
|
$
|
72,687
|
|
|
$
|
41,438
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
41,844
|
|
|
$
|
33,271
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily
attributable to a decrease in nondeductible acquired IPR&D
recognized for financial reporting purposes in 2009 compared to
2008. Additionally, the percentage of consolidated income before
income taxes earned in foreign jurisdictions, which primarily
have lower statutory tax rates than the U.S. statutory tax
rate, increased from 36% in 2008 to 43% in 2009.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
flow summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
272,573
|
|
|
$
|
172,191
|
|
|
$
|
87,882
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(285,053
|
)
|
|
|
(256,569
|
)
|
|
|
(277,249
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
116,474
|
|
|
|
(98,862
|
)
|
|
|
337,672
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
104,314
|
|
|
$
|
(182,391
|
)
|
|
$
|
152,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in 2010 consists of net
income of $124.9 million plus net non-cash adjustments of
$149.8 million and a $2.1 million decrease in net
operating assets. The primary non-cash expenses added back to
net income included share based compensation of
$71.6 million, depreciation and amortization expenses
related to property and equipment and intangible assets of
$42.0 million, and the amortization of the debt discount on
our convertible notes totaling $21.4 million. The main
drivers in the change in net operating assets included increases
in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities. These increases were primarily related to the
growth of our business.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2009 consists of net
income of $72.3 million plus net non-cash adjustments of
$115.7 million and an $15.8 million increase in net
operating assets. The primary non-cash expenses added back to
net income included share based compensation of
$60.8 million and depreciation and amortization expense
related to property and equipment, intangibles and the debt
discount on our convertible notes totaling $51.5 million.
Investing
Activities
Cash used in investing activities totaled $285.0 million in
2010. During the year we:
|
|
|
|
|
purchased and sold
available-for-sale
securities totaling $846.2 million and $688.6 million,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
paid net cash of $98.2 million for acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
sold trading securities totaling $54.9 million;
|
|
|
|
used $49.8 million for capital expenditures primarily
associated with the purchase of manufacturing equipment and
infrastructure for additional production capacity and rental and
loaner instruments; and
|
|
|
|
made strategic investments totaling $27.7 million.
|
39
Cash used in investing activities totaled $256.6 million in
2009. We purchased and sold
available-for-sale
securities totaling $694.5 million and $514.2 million,
respectively. We incurred $52.7 million in capital
expenditures primarily associated with the expansion of our
facilities and infrastructure at our San Diego, Hayward and
UK locations.
Financing
Activities
Cash provided by financing activities totaled
$116.5 million in 2010. We received $118.0 million in
proceeds from the issuance of our common stock through the
exercise of stock options and warrants and under our Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. We also received $42.4 million in
incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised.
These increases were partially offset by common stock
repurchases of $44.0 million.
Cash used in financing activities totaled $98.9 million in
2009. During the year we repurchased approximately
6.1 million shares of our common stock for
$175.1 million, which was partially offset by
$39.4 million in proceeds received from issuance of common
stock through the exercise of stock options and under our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We also received
$39.3 million in incremental tax benefit related to stock
options exercised.
Liquidity
We manage our business to maximize operating cash flows as the
primary source of our liquidity. Our ability to generate cash
from operations provides us with the financial flexibility we
need to meet operating, investing, and financing needs.
Historically, we have issued debt and equity securities to
finance our requirements to the extent that cash provided by
operating activities was not sufficient to fund our needs.
At January 2, 2011, we had approximately
$894.3 million in cash and short-term investments. Our
short-term investments include marketable securities consisting
of debt securities in government sponsored entities, corporate
debt securities, and U.S. treasury notes.
On February 16, 2007, we issued $400.0 million in
principal of convertible senior notes that mature
February 15, 2014. We pay 0.625% interest per annum on the
principal amount of the notes, payable semi-annually in arrears
in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The notes are
convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common
stock under certain circumstances as described in note 7.
Convertible Senior Notes in Part II, Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
As of January 2, 2011, the principal amount of the notes
was $390.0 million due to the conversion of
$10.0 million of the notes during the first quarter of
2009. During the period from January 3, 2011 to
February 28, 2011, certain noteholders notified us of their
election to convert an aggregate of $251.1 million
principal amount of the notes. See note 15. Subsequent
Events in Part II, Item 8, of this
Form 10-K
for additional information on these conversions.
Our primary short-term needs for capital, which are subject to
change, include expenditures related to:
|
|
|
|
|
potential strategic acquisitions and investments;
|
|
|
|
support of our commercialization efforts related to our current
and future products, including expansion of our direct sales
force and field support resources both in the United States and
abroad;
|
|
|
|
the repurchase of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
|
|
the continued advancement of research and development efforts;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of equipment and other fixed assets for use in
our current and future manufacturing and research and
development facilities; and
|
|
|
|
the expansion needs of our facilities, including costs of
leasing additional facilities.
|
We expect that our product revenue and the resulting operating
income, as well as the status of each of our new product
development programs, will significantly impact our cash
management decisions.
We anticipate that our current cash and cash equivalents and
income from operations will be sufficient to fund our operating
needs for at least the next 12 months, barring unforeseen
circumstances. Operating needs
40
include the planned costs to operate our business, including
amounts required to fund working capital and capital
expenditures. At the present time, we have no material
commitments for capital expenditures. Our future capital
requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend
on many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully commercialize and further develop
our technologies and create innovative products in our markets;
|
|
|
|
scientific progress in our research and development programs and
the magnitude of those programs;
|
|
|
|
competing technological and market developments; and
|
|
|
|
the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or
acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement
our product and service offerings.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not participate in any transactions that generate
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
During the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011, we were not
involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements
within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.
Contractual
Obligations
Contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and
liabilities under agreements with third parties, and exclude
orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course
of business that are not enforceable or legally binding. The
following table represents our contractual obligations as of
January 2, 2011, aggregated by type (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 3 Years
|
|
|
3 5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Debt obligations(2)
|
|
$
|
398,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
$
|
391,218
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
499,261
|
|
|
|
13,965
|
|
|
|
37,737
|
|
|
|
40,985
|
|
|
|
406,574
|
|
Amounts due under executive deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
903,063
|
|
|
$
|
21,674
|
|
|
$
|
42,612
|
|
|
$
|
432,203
|
|
|
$
|
406,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The table excludes $22.7 million of uncertain tax benefits.
We have not included this amount in the table because we cannot
make a reasonably reliable estimate regarding the timing of
settlements with taxing authorities, if any. See note 11.
Income Taxes in Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further discussion of our uncertain tax positions. The table
also excludes $35.0 million in contingent consideration
related to acquisitions. We have not included this amount in the
table because we cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate
regarding whether the milestones required for these payments
will be achieved. See note 3. Acquisitions in
Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further discussion of our contingent consideration. |
|
(2) |
|
Debt obligations include the principal amount of our convertible
senior notes and interest payments totaling 0.625% per annum.
Although these notes mature in 2014, we classify the principal
amount of the notes as current in our consolidated balance sheet
due to the convertibility feature. In addition, during the
period from January 3, 2011 to February 28, 2011,
certain noteholders notified us of their election to convert an
aggregate of $251.1 million principal amount of the notes
in exchange for the repayment of the principal amount and a
certain number of shares of the Companys common stock. See
note 7. Convertible Senior Notes and note 15
Subsequent Events in Part II, Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K
for further discussion of the terms of the convertible senior
notes and the conversion notices in the subsequent period. |
41
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical
experience, market and other conditions, and various other
assumptions it believes to be reasonable. Although these
estimates are based on managements best knowledge of
current events and actions that may impact us in the future, the
estimation process is, by its nature, uncertain given that
estimates depend on events over which we may not have control.
If market and other conditions change from those that we
anticipate, our consolidated financial statements may be
materially affected. In addition, if our assumptions change, we
may need to revise our estimates, or take other corrective
actions, either of which may also have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies and
estimates have a higher degree of inherent uncertainty and
require our most significant judgments. In addition, had we used
estimates different from any of these, our consolidated
financial statements could have been materially different from
those presented. Members of our senior management have discussed
the development and selection of our critical accounting
policies and estimates, and our disclosure regarding them, with
the audit committee of our board of directors. Our accounting
policies are more fully described in note 1. Organization
and Significant Accounting Policies in Part II,
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Revenue
Recognition
Our revenue is generated primarily from the sale of products and
services. Product revenue primarily consists of sales of
instruments and consumables used in genetic analysis. Service
and other revenue primarily consists of revenue received for
performing genotyping and sequencing services, extended warranty
sales, and amounts earned under research agreements with
government grants, which are recognized in the period during
which the related costs are incurred. The timing of revenue
recognition and the amount of revenue actually recognized in
each case depends upon a variety of factors, including the
specific terms of each arrangement and the nature of our
deliverables and obligations. Determination of the appropriate
amount of revenue recognized involves significant judgments and
estimates and actual results may differ from our estimates.
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable,
and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where
final acceptance of the product or system is required, revenue
is deferred until all the acceptance criteria have been met. All
revenue is recorded net of any discounts.
Revenue for product sales is recognized generally upon transfer
of title to the customer, provided that no significant
obligations remain and collection of the receivable is
reasonably assured. Revenue for genotyping and sequencing
services is recognized when earned, which is generally at the
time the genotyping or sequencing analysis data is made
available to the customer or agreed upon milestones are reached.
In order to assess whether the price is fixed or determinable,
we evaluate whether refund rights exist. If there are refund
rights or payment terms based on future performance, we defer
revenue recognition until the price becomes fixed or
determinable. We assess collectibility based on a number of
factors, including past transaction history with the customer
and the creditworthiness of the customer. If we determine that
collection of a payment is not reasonably assured, revenue
recognition is deferred until receipt of payment.
We regularly enter into contracts where revenue is derived from
multiple deliverables including any mix of products or services.
These products or services are generally delivered within a
short time frame, approximately three to six months, of the
contract execution date. Revenue recognition for contracts with
multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of
accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item
is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered
item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are
considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold
separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the
item on a stand-alone basis.
42
For transactions entered into in 2009 and 2010, consideration is
allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables
based on their relative selling price. The relative selling
price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party
evidence of selling price if VSOE does not exist. If neither
VSOE nor third-party evidence exists, we use best estimate of
the selling price for the deliverable.
For transactions entered into prior to 2009, consideration was
generally allocated to each unit of accounting based upon its
relative fair value when objective and reliable evidence of fair
value existed for all units of accounting in an arrangement. The
fair value of an item was generally the price charged for the
product, if the item was regularly sold on a stand-alone basis.
In those instances when objective and reliable evidence of fair
value existed for the undelivered items but not for the
delivered items, the residual method was used to allocate the
arrangement consideration. Under the residual method, the amount
of arrangement consideration allocated to the delivered items
equaled the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate
fair value of the undelivered items. When we were unable to
establish stand-alone value for delivered items or when fair
value of undelivered items had not been established, revenue was
deferred until all elements were delivered and services had been
performed, or until fair value could objectively be determined
for any remaining undelivered elements.
In order to establish VSOE of selling price, we must regularly
sell the product or service on a standalone basis with a
substantial majority priced within a relatively narrow range.
VSOE of selling price is usually the midpoint of that range. If
there are not a sufficient number of standalone sales and VSOE
of selling price cannot be determined, then we consider whether
third party evidence can be used to establish selling price. Due
to the lack of similar products and services sold by other
companies within the industry, we have rarely established
selling price using third-party evidence. If neither VSOE nor
third party evidence of selling price exists, we determine our
best estimate of selling price using average selling prices over
a rolling
12-month
period coupled with an assessment of current market conditions.
If the product or service has no history of sales or if the
sales volume is not sufficient, we rely upon prices set by our
pricing committee adjusted for applicable discounts. We
recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we determine
there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
In the first quarter of 2010, we offered an incentive with the
launch of the HiSeq 2000 that enabled existing Genome Analyzer
customers to trade in their Genome Analyzer and receive a
discount on the purchase of a HiSeq 2000. The incentive was
limited to customers who had purchased a Genome Analyzer as of
the date of the announcement and was the first significant
trade-in program we have offered. We will account for HiSeq 2000
discounts related to the Genome Analyzer trade-in program in the
period in which the HiSeq 2000 revenue is recognized.
Investments
We determine the fair value of our assets and liabilities based
on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the
measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair
value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs. We use a fair value hierarchy with three
levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are
observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
43
In using this fair value hierarchy, management may be required
to make assumptions of pricing by market participants and
assumptions about risk, specifically when using unobservable
inputs to determine fair value. These assumptions are judgmental
in nature and may significantly affect our results of operations.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. We evaluate the collectibility of our
accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. We
regularly analyze customer accounts, review the length of time
receivables are outstanding, review historical loss rates and
assess current economic trends that may impact the level of
credit losses in the future. Our allowance for doubtful accounts
has generally been adequate to cover our actual credit losses.
However, since we cannot reliably predict future changes in the
financial stability of our customers and we may need to increase
our reserves if the financial conditions of our customers
deteriorate.
Inventory
Valuation
We record adjustments to inventory for potentially excess,
obsolete, or impaired goods in order to state inventory at net
realizable value. We must make assumptions about future demand,
market conditions, and the release of new products that will
supersede old ones. We regularly review inventory for excess and
obsolete products and components, taking into account product
life cycles, quality issues, historical experience, and usage
forecasts. If actual market conditions are less favorable than
anticipated, additional inventory adjustments could be required.
Contingencies
We are subject to legal proceedings primarily related to
intellectual property matters. We routinely assess the
likelihood of adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as
well as ranges of probable losses, to the extent losses are
reasonably estimable. If losses are probable and reasonably
estimable, we will record a liability and an expense for the
estimated loss. Disclosure for specific legal contingencies is
provided if the likelihood of occurrence is probable and the
exposure is considered material to the consolidated financial
statements. In making determinations of likely outcomes of
litigation matters, management considers many factors. These
factors include, but are not limited to, past history,
scientific and other evidence, and the specifics and status of
each matter. We may change our estimates if our assessment of
the various factors changes, which may result in the recording
of an accrual or a change in a previously recorded accrual.
Predicting the outcome of claims and litigation, and estimating
related costs and exposure involves substantial uncertainties
that could cause actual costs to vary materially from estimates
and accruals.
Business
Combinations
Under the acquisition method of accounting, we allocate the fair
value of the total consideration transferred to the tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition.
The fair values assigned, defined as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between willing market participants, are
based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. We
record the excess consideration over the aggregate fair value of
tangible and intangible assets, net of liabilities assumed, as
goodwill. These valuations require us to make significant
estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible
assets.
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, additional
contingent consideration is earned by the sellers upon
completion of certain future performance milestones. Prior to
fiscal year 2009, the Company recognized contingent
consideration as an additional element of the cost of the
acquisition, generally goodwill, when the contingency was
resolved beyond a reasonable doubt and the additional
consideration was issued or became issuable. Due to changes in
the accounting standards regarding business combinations, for
all acquisitions consummated on or after December 29, 2008,
a liability is recorded on the acquisition date for an estimate
of the acquisition date fair value of the contingent
consideration by applying the income approach utilizing
44
variable factors such as anticipated future cash flows,
risk-free adjusted discount rates and nonperformance risk. Any
change in the fair value of the contingent consideration
subsequent to the acquisition date is recognized in acquisition
related (gain) expense, net, a component of operating expenses,
in the consolidated statements of income. This method requires
significant management judgment, including the probability of
achieving certain future milestones and discount rates. Future
changes in our estimates could result in expenses or gains.
Management uses a discounted cash flow method to value our
acquired intangible assets. This method requires significant
management judgment to forecast future operating results and
establish residual growth rates and discount factors. The
estimates we use to value and amortize intangible assets are
consistent with the plans and estimates that we use to manage
our business and are based on available historical information
and industry estimates and averages. If the subsequent actual
results and updated projections of the underlying business
activity change compared with the assumptions and projections
used to develop these values, we could experience impairment
charges. In addition, we have estimated the economic lives of
certain acquired assets and these lives are used to calculate
depreciation and amortization expense. If our estimates of the
economic lives change, depreciation or amortization expenses
could be accelerated or slowed.
Intangible
Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets Impairment
Assessments
We estimate the fair value of intangible assets and other
long-lived assets that have finite useful lives whenever an
event or change in circumstances indicates that the carrying
value of the asset may not be recovered through undiscounted
future operating cash flows.
In order to estimate the fair value of purchased intangible
assets and other long-lived assets that have finite useful
lives, we estimate the present value of future cash flows from
those assets. The key assumptions that we use in our discounted
cash flow model are the amount and timing of estimated future
cash flows to be generated by the asset over an extended period
of time and a rate of return that considers the relative risk of
achieving the cash flows, the time value of money, and other
factors that a willing market participant would consider.
Significant judgment is required to estimate the amount and
timing of future cash flows and the relative risk of achieving
those cash flows. We had a total of $129.9 million in net
property and equipment and $70.0 million in net intangible
assets on our balance sheet at January 2, 2011.
Assumptions and estimates about future values and remaining
useful lives are complex and often subjective. They can be
affected by a variety of factors, including external factors
such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such
as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts.
For example, if our future operating results do not meet current
forecasts or if we experience a sustained decline in our market
capitalization that is determined to be indicative of a
reduction in fair value of one or more of our reporting units,
we may be required to record future impairment charges for
purchased intangible assets. Impairment charges could materially
decrease our future net income and result in lower asset values
on our balance sheet.
Share-Based
Compensation
We are required to measure and recognize compensation expense
for all share-based payments made to employees and directors
based on estimated fair value. We estimate the fair value of
stock options granted and stock purchases under our employee
stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM)
option-pricing model. The fair value of our restricted stock
units is based on the market price of our common stock on the
date of grant.
The determination of fair value of share-based awards using the
BSM model requires the use of certain estimates and highly
judgmental assumptions that affect the amount of share-based
compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements
of income. These include estimates of the expected volatility of
our stock price, expected life of an award, expected dividends,
and the risk-free interest rate. We determine the volatility of
our stock price by equally weighing the historical and implied
volatility of our common stock. The historical volatility of our
common stock over the most recent period is generally
commensurate with the estimated expected life of our stock
awards, adjusted for the impact of unusual fluctuations not
reasonably
45
expected to recur, and other relevant factors. Implied
volatility is calculated from the implied market volatility of
exchange-traded call options on our common stock. The expected
life of an award is based on historical forfeiture experience,
exercise activity, and on the terms and conditions of the stock
awards. We determined expected dividend yield to be 0% given we
have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and we currently do not anticipate paying such cash
dividends. The risk-free interest rate is based upon
U.S. Treasury securities with remaining terms similar to
the expected term of the share-based awards. We amortize the
fair value of share-based compensation on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service periods of the awards. If any of the
assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly,
share-based compensation expense may differ materially from what
we have recorded in the current period.
Income
Taxes
Our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and
liabilities, and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits reflect
our best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid.
Significant judgments and estimates based on interpretations of
existing tax laws or regulations in the U.S. and the
numerous foreign jurisdictions where we are subject to income
tax are required in determining our provision for income taxes.
Changes in tax laws, statutory tax rates, and estimates of the
companys future taxable income could impact the deferred
tax assets and liabilities provided for in the consolidated
financial statements and would require an adjustment to the
provision for income taxes.
Deferred tax assets are regularly assessed to determine the
likelihood they will be recovered from future taxable income. A
valuation allowance is established when we believe it is more
likely than not the future realization of all or some of a
deferred tax asset will not be achieved. In evaluating our
ability to recover deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction
which they arise we consider all available positive and negative
evidence. Factors reviewed include the cumulative pre-tax book
income for the past three years, scheduled reversals of deferred
tax liabilities, our history of earnings and reliable
forecasting, projections of pre-tax book income over the
foreseeable future, and the impact of any feasible and prudent
tax planning strategies. Based on the available evidence as of
January 2, 2011, we were not able to conclude it is more
likely than not certain U.S. and foreign deferred tax
assets will be realized. Therefore, we recorded a valuation
allowance of $1.9 million and $3.1 million against
certain U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets, respectively.
We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial
statements only if that position is more likely than not of
being sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, based on
the technical merits of the position. Tax authorities regularly
examine our returns in the jurisdictions in which we do business
and we regularly assess the tax risk of the companys
return filing positions. Due to the complexity of some of the
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in payments
that are materially different from our current estimate of the
tax liability. These differences, as well as any interest and
penalties, will be reflected in the provision for income taxes
in the period in which they are determined.
Warranties
We generally provide a one-year warranty on instruments.
Additionally, we provide a warranty on consumables through the
expiry date, which generally ranges from six to twelve months
after the manufacture date. We establish an accrual for
estimated warranty expenses based on historical experience as
well as anticipated product performance. We periodically review
the adequacy of our warranty reserve, and adjust, if necessary,
the warranty percentage and accrual based on actual experience
and estimated costs to be incurred. If our estimates of warranty
obligation change or if actual product performance is below our
expectations we may incur additional warranty expense.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Our investment portfolio is exposed to market risk for changes
in interest rates. The fair market value of fixed rate
securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest
rates while income earned on floating rate securities may
decline as a result of decreases in interest rates. Under our
current policies, we do
46
not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure
to interest rate changes. We attempt to ensure the safety and
preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default
risk, market risk, and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default
risk by investing in investment grade securities. We have
historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for
our investment portfolio, and we believe a hypothetical
100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the
entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the
fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments. In
addition, if a 100 basis point change in overall interest
rates were to occur in 2011, our interest income would change by
approximately $8.9 million in relation to amounts we would
expect to earn, based on our cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments as of January 2, 2011.
Changes in interest rates may also impact gains or losses from
the conversion of our outstanding convertible senior notes. As
of January 2, 2011, we had $390.0 million aggregate
principal amount of convertible notes outstanding. The notes are
convertible into cash, and if applicable, shares of our common
stock under certain circumstances, including trading price
conditions related to our common stock. If the trading price of
our common stock remains significantly above the conversion
price of $21.83 per share, we expect that noteholders will elect
to convert the notes. Upon conversion, we are required to record
a gain or loss for the difference between the fair value of the
debt to be extinguished and its corresponding net carrying
value. The fair value of the debt to be extinguished depends on
our current incremental borrowing rate. The net carrying value
of the notes has an implicit interest rate of 8.27%. If our
incremental borrowing rate at the time of conversion is higher
or lower than the implied interest rate of the notes, we will
record a gain or loss in our consolidated statement of income
during the period in which the notes are converted. An
incremental borrowing rate that is a hypothetical 100 basis
points lower than the implicit interest rate upon conversion of
$100 million aggregate principal amount of the notes would
result in a loss of approximately $3.5 million.
Market
Price Sensitive Instruments
In order to reduce potential equity dilution, in connection with
the issuance (and potential conversion) of our convertible
notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions,
entitling us to purchase up to 18,322,320 shares of our
common stock at a strike price of $21.83 per share, subject to
adjustment. In addition, we sold to the hedge transaction
counterparties warrants exercisable on a net-share basis, for up
to 18,322,320 shares of our common stock at a strike price
of $31.435 per share, subject to adjustment. The anti-dilutive
effect of the note hedge transactions, if any, could be
partially or fully offset to the extent the trading price of our
common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants on the
exercise dates of the warrants, which occur during 2014,
assuming the warrants are exercised.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
We conduct a portion of our business in currencies other than
the entitys U.S. dollar functional currency. These
transactions give rise to monetary assets and liabilities that
are denominated in currencies other than the entitys
functional currency. The value of these monetary assets and
liabilities are subject to changes in currency exchange rates
from the time the transactions are originated until settlement
in cash. Our foreign currency exposures are primarily
concentrated in the Euro, Yen, British pound sterling,
Australian dollar, and Singapore dollar. Both realized and
unrealized gains or losses on the value of these monetary assets
and liabilities are included in the determination of net income.
We recorded a net currency exchange gain on business
transactions, net of hedging transactions, of $1.0 million
for each of the years ended January 2, 2011 and
January 3, 2010, which are included in other (expense)
income, net, in the consolidated statements of income.
47
We use forward exchange contracts to manage a portion of the
foreign currency exposure risk for foreign subsidiaries with
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other
than the entitys functional currency. We only use
derivative financial instruments to reduce foreign currency
exchange rate risks; we do not hold any derivative financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We primarily
use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency
exposures, and they generally have terms of one month or less.
Realized and unrealized gains or losses on the value of
financial contracts entered into to hedge the exchange rate
exposure of these monetary assets and liabilities are also
included in the determination of net income, as they have not
been designated for hedge accounting. These contracts, which
settle monthly, effectively fix the exchange rate at which these
specific monetary assets and liabilities will be settled, so
that gains or losses on the forward contracts offset the losses
or gains from changes in the value of the underlying monetary
assets and liabilities. At January 2, 2011, we had
$20.0 million of foreign currency forward contracts
outstanding to hedge foreign currency risk.
48
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
49
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Illumina, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Illumina, Inc. as of January 2, 2011 and January 3,
2010, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended January 2, 2011. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Illumina, Inc. at January 2, 2011 and
January 3, 2010, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended January 2, 2011, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, Illumina, Inc. changed its method of accounting for
business combinations effective December 29, 2008.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Illumina, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting
as of January 2, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
San Diego, California
February 28, 2011
50
ILLUMINA,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
248,947
|
|
|
$
|
144,633
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
645,342
|
|
|
|
548,894
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
165,598
|
|
|
|
157,751
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
142,211
|
|
|
|
92,776
|
|
Deferred tax assets, current portion
|
|
|
19,378
|
|
|
|
20,021
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
36,922
|
|
|
|
17,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,258,398
|
|
|
|
981,590
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
129,874
|
|
|
|
117,188
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
278,206
|
|
|
|
213,452
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
70,024
|
|
|
|
43,788
|
|
Deferred tax assets, long-term portion
|
|
|
39,497
|
|
|
|
47,371
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
63,114
|
|
|
|
26,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,839,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,429,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
66,744
|
|
|
$
|
52,781
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
156,164
|
|
|
|
98,253
|
|
Long-term debt, current portion
|
|
|
311,609
|
|
|
|
290,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
534,517
|
|
|
|
441,236
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
28,531
|
|
|
|
24,656
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion option subject to cash settlement
|
|
|
78,390
|
|
|
|
99,797
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued at January 2, 2011 and
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 320,000,000 shares
authorized, 151,512,837 shares issued at January 2,
2011, 143,544,265 shares issued at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,891,288
|
|
|
|
1,637,751
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(155,335
|
)
|
|
|
(280,226
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost (24,904,564 shares at
January 2, 2011 and 24,068,450 shares at
January 3, 2010)
|
|
|
(541,559
|
)
|
|
|
(497,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,197,675
|
|
|
|
864,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,839,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,429,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
51
ILLUMINA,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended_
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
842,510
|
|
|
$
|
627,240
|
|
|
$
|
532,390
|
|
Service and other revenue
|
|
|
60,231
|
|
|
|
39,084
|
|
|
|
40,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
902,741
|
|
|
|
666,324
|
|
|
|
573,225
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
271,997
|
|
|
|
190,714
|
|
|
|
192,868
|
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
|
|
21,399
|
|
|
|
15,055
|
|
|
|
12,756
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,805
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
10,438
|
|
Impairment of manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
301,201
|
|
|
|
212,449
|
|
|
|
220,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
601,540
|
|
|
|
453,875
|
|
|
|
353,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
177,947
|
|
|
|
140,616
|
|
|
|
99,963
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
220,990
|
|
|
|
176,337
|
|
|
|
148,014
|
|
Acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
|
|
(9,051
|
)
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
389,886
|
|
|
|
328,278
|
|
|
|
272,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
211,654
|
|
|
|
125,597
|
|
|
|
80,457
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,378
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
12,519
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24,598
|
)
|
|
|
(23,718
|
)
|
|
|
(22,210
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(10,055
|
)
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
(26,275
|
)
|
|
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
|
(7,770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
185,379
|
|
|
|
114,125
|
|
|
|
72,687
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
60,488
|
|
|
|
41,844
|
|
|
|
33,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
124,891
|
|
|
$
|
72,281
|
|
|
$
|
39,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per basic share
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating basic net income per share
|
|
|
123,581
|
|
|
|
123,154
|
|
|
|
116,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating diluted net income per share
|
|
|
143,433
|
|
|
|
137,096
|
|
|
|
133,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
52
ILLUMINA,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
125,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
994,869
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
(391,923
|
)
|
|
|
(14,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
353,927
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,416
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,475
|
|
Issuance of common stock in conjunction with secondary offering,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
8,050
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
342,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,650
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
44,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,330
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,695
|
|
Incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,501
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,109
|
)
|
|
|
(70,785
|
)
|
|
|
(70,785
|
)
|
Remeasurement of convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 28, 2008
|
|
|
138,937
|
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
1,469,770
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
|
(352,507
|
)
|
|
|
(17,928
|
)
|
|
|
(322,407
|
)
|
|
|
798,667
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,281
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,689
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
39,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,379
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,813
|
|
Incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,319
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
(175,136
|
)
|
|
|
(175,136
|
)
|
Remeasurement of convertible debt
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2010
|
|
|
143,544
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
1,637,751
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
(280,226
|
)
|
|
|
(24,068
|
)
|
|
|
(497,543
|
)
|
|
|
864,248
|
|
Components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,891
|
|
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,826
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
101,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,016
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,029
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,725
|
|
Incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,445
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
(44,016
|
)
|
|
|
(44,016
|
)
|
Remeasurement of convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 2, 2011
|
|
|
151,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,288
|
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
|
$
|
(155,335
|
)
|
|
|
(24,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
(541,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,197,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
53
ILLUMINA,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
124,891
|
|
|
$
|
72,281
|
|
|
$
|
39,416
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,805
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
10,438
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
21,407
|
|
|
|
20,286
|
|
|
|
18,883
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(10,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of cost-method investment
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on acquisition
|
|
|
(2,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
34,204
|
|
|
|
24,504
|
|
|
|
17,285
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
71,645
|
|
|
|
60,811
|
|
|
|
47,688
|
|
Incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
(42,445
|
)
|
|
|
(39,319
|
)
|
|
|
(18,501
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
48,696
|
|
|
|
29,704
|
|
|
|
31,533
|
|
Impairment of manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
Other non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(7,844
|
)
|
|
|
(18,578
|
)
|
|
|
(57,672
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(48,583
|
)
|
|
|
(20,557
|
)
|
|
|
(19,560
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
(3,429
|
)
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,566
|
)
|
|
|
(2,670
|
)
|
|
|
(1,815
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
23,150
|
|
|
|
11,778
|
|
|
|
4,840
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,028
|
|
|
|
19,997
|
|
|
|
31,716
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
Litigation settlements payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,536
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(3,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
272,573
|
|
|
|
172,191
|
|
|
|
87,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
(846,208
|
)
|
|
|
(694,487
|
)
|
|
|
(568,707
|
)
|
Sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
688,611
|
|
|
|
514,216
|
|
|
|
411,817
|
|
Sales and maturities of trading securities
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
|
(98,211
|
)
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(24,666
|
)
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(27,677
|
)
|
|
|
(19,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(49,818
|
)
|
|
|
(52,673
|
)
|
|
|
(59,693
|
)
|
Cash paid for intangible assets
|
|
|
(6,650
|
)
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
(36,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(285,053
|
)
|
|
|
(256,569
|
)
|
|
|
(277,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Incremental tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
42,445
|
|
|
|
39,319
|
|
|
|
18,501
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(44,016
|
)
|
|
|
(175,136
|
)
|
|
|
(70,785
|
)
|
Proceeds from secondary offering, net of issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,650
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants
|
|
|
16,029
|
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
102,016
|
|
|
|
39,379
|
|
|
|
44,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
116,474
|
|
|
|
(98,862
|
)
|
|
|
337,672
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
104,314
|
|
|
|
(182,391
|
)
|
|
|
152,083
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
144,633
|
|
|
|
327,024
|
|
|
|
174,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
248,947
|
|
|
$
|
144,633
|
|
|
$
|
327,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
31,566
|
|
|
$
|
10,361
|
|
|
$
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
54
ILLUMINA,
INC.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this
report to Illumina, we, us,
the Company, and our refer to Illumina,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Business
Illumina, Inc. (the Company) is a leading developer,
manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated
systems for the analysis of genetic variation and biological
function. Using the Companys proprietary technologies,
Illumina provides a comprehensive line of genetic analysis
solutions, with products and services that serve a broad range
of highly interconnected markets, including sequencing,
genotyping, gene expression, and molecular diagnostics. The
Companys customers include leading genomic research
centers, academic institutions, government laboratories, and
clinical research organizations, as well as pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, agrigenomics, and consumer genomics companies.
Basis
of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been
prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) and include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal
Year
The Companys fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the
Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or
14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31,
June 30, September 30, and December 31. The year
ended January 2, 2011 was 52 weeks; the year ended
January 3, 2010 was 53 weeks; the year ended
December 28, 2008 was 52 weeks.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires that management
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Segment
Information
The Company is organized in two business segments, the Life
Sciences Business Unit and Diagnostics Business Unit. The Life
Sciences Business Unit includes all products and services that
are primarily related to the research market, namely the product
lines based on the Companys sequencing, BeadArray,
VeraCode, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
technologies, and the Diagnostics Business Unit focuses on the
emerging opportunity in molecular diagnostics. During all
periods presented, the Company had limited activity related to
the Diagnostics Business Unit. Accordingly, the Companys
operating results for both units are reported on an aggregate
basis as one reportable segment during these periods. The
Company will begin reporting in two segments once revenues,
operating profit or loss, or assets of the Diagnostics Business
Unit exceed 10% of the consolidated amounts.
Acquisitions
Effective December 29, 2008, the Company adopted the
FASBs revised authoritative guidance for business
combinations. This revised guidance requires an acquiring
company to measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
including contingent considerations and all contractual
contingencies, at fair value as of the acquisition date. In
addition, an acquiring company is required to capitalize
in-process research and development (IPR&D) and either
amortize it over the life of the product upon commercialization,
or write it
55
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
off if the project is abandoned or impaired. Previously,
post-acquisition adjustments related to business combination
deferred tax asset valuation allowances and liabilities for
uncertain tax positions were generally required to be recorded
as an increase or decrease to Goodwill. The revised guidance
does not permit this accounting and, generally, requires any
such changes to be recorded in current period income tax
expense. Thus, all changes to valuation allowances and
liabilities for uncertain tax positions established in
acquisition accounting, regardless of the guidance used to
initially account for the business combination, will be
recognized in current period income tax expense. Additionally,
this guidance requires that contingent purchase consideration be
remeasured to estimated fair value at each reporting period with
the change in fair value recorded in the results of operations.
The impact of the adoption of this guidance did not have an
impact on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended January 3, 2010. As a result of acquisitions
completed in the year ended January 2, 2011, the Company
capitalized $21.4 million of IPR&D that would have
been expensed under the previous guidance. In addition the
Company recorded $14.1 million of contingent consideration
liability at fair value at the acquisition date which was
remeasured with a net consolidated statement of income impact of
$10.4 million recorded in acquisition related (gain)
expense, net, a component of operating expenses.
For an acquisition consummated prior to December 29, 2008,
the Company recognizes additional contingent consideration as an
additional element of the cost of the acquisition when the
contingency is resolved beyond a reasonable doubt and the
additional consideration is issued or becomes issuable, in
accordance with the accounting guidance effective at the
acquisition date. This results in additional IPR&D charges
in periods subsequent to the acquisition recorded in acquisition
related (gain) expense, net.
Cash
Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Cash equivalents are comprised of short-term, highly liquid
investments with maturities of 90 days or less at the date
of purchase.
Short-term investments consist of U.S. Treasury and
U.S. government agency securities, corporate notes and
bonds, and commercial paper. Management classifies short-term
investments as
available-for-sale
at the time of purchase and reevaluates such classification as
of each balance sheet date. All short-term investments are
recorded at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains and losses
for
available-for-sale
securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive
income, a component of stockholders equity. The Company
evaluates its investments to assess whether those with
unrealized loss positions are other than temporarily impaired.
Impairments are considered to be other than temporary if they
are related to deterioration in credit risk or if it is likely
that the Company will sell the securities before the recovery of
their cost basis. Realized gains and losses and declines in
value judged to be other than temporary are determined based on
the specific identification method and are reported in other
(expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of income.
Fair
Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and
other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities,
excluding acquisition related contingent consideration liability
noted below, approximate the related fair values due to the
short-term maturities of these instruments. The estimated fair
value of the convertible senior notes is determined by using
available market information as of the latest trading date prior
to the Companys fiscal year-end provided by a third party
financial institution. The par value and approximate fair value
of the Companys convertible notes was $390.0 million
and $1,142.5 million, respectively, at January 2,
2011, and $390.0 million and $553.2 million,
respectively, at January 3, 2010.
The Company determines the fair value of its assets and
liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in
the principal or most
56
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use
of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with three
levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs, other than Level 1,
that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices
in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
The following table presents the Companys fair value
hierarchy for assets and liability measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of January 2, 2011 and January 3,
2010, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (cash equivalent)
|
|
$
|
148,822
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,822
|
|
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,697
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,758
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
201,709
|
|
|
$
|
592,455
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
794,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition related contingent consideration liability
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,738
|
|
|
$
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2 _
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (cash equivalent)
|
|
$
|
81,153
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,153
|
|
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,701
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,821
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
92,625
|
|
|
$
|
482,522
|
|
|
$
|
54,900
|
|
|
$
|
630,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company measures the fair value of debt securities in
government sponsored entities and corporate debt securities on a
recurring basis primarily using quoted prices for similar assets
in active markets.
Included in the total consideration transferred for the
Companys acquisition of Helixis, Inc. (Helixis), was
contingent consideration payments that could range from $0 to
$35 million based on the achievement of certain
revenue-based milestones by December 31, 2010 and by
December 31, 2011. On the acquisition date, a liability of
$14.1 million was recorded at the estimated fair value of
the contingent consideration. The December 31,
2010 milestone was not achieved and the likelihood of
paying the remaining contingent consideration of up to
$30 million declined. Accordingly, the Company reassessed
the fair value of the
57
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contingent consideration at $3.7 million and recorded the
change in fair value of $10.4 million in acquisition
related (gain) expense, net, in the consolidated statements of
income in the fourth quarter of 2010.
This fair value measurement is a Level 3 measurement as it
is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or
no market activity. Significant assumptions used in the
measurement include probabilities of achieving the remaining
milestone and the discount rates used in the income approach of
valuation, which ranged from 27% to 52% depending on the
likelihood assessed. Future changes in the fair value of the
contingent consideration as a result of changes in these
significant inputs could have a significant effect on the
consolidated statements of income and the financial position in
the period of the change.
The following table includes a summary of the changes in
estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability
(in thousands) during the year ended January 2, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
|
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
(Level 3 Measurement)
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisition of Helixis
|
|
|
14,114
|
|
Gain recorded in acquisition related (gain) expense, net
|
|
|
(10,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 2, 2011
|
|
$
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the net invoice value
and are not interest bearing. The Company considers receivables
past due based on the contractual payment terms. The Company
reviews its exposure to amounts receivable and reserves specific
amounts if collectibility is no longer reasonably assured. The
Company also reserves a percentage of its trade receivable
balance based on collection history and current economic trends
that might impact the level of future credit losses. The Company
re-evaluates such reserves on a regular basis and adjusts its
reserves as needed.
Concentrations
of Risk
The Company operates in markets that are highly competitive and
rapidly changing. Significant technological changes, shifting
customer needs, the emergence of competitive products or
services with new capabilities, and other factors could
negatively impact the Companys operating results.
The Company is also subject to risks related to its financial
instruments including its cash and cash equivalents,
investments, and accounts receivable. Most of the Companys
cash and cash equivalents as of January 2, 2011 were
deposited with financial institutions in the United States. The
Companys investment policy restricts the amount of credit
exposure to any one issuer to 5% of the portfolio at the time of
purchase and to any one industry sector, as defined by Bloomberg
classifications, to 25% of the portfolio at the time of
purchase. There is no limit to the percentage of the portfolio
that may be maintained in U.S. treasury obligations,
U.S. government agencies, and money market funds. The
Company performs a regular review of customer activity and
associated credit risks and do not require collateral or enter
into netting arrangements. The Company has historically not
experienced significant credit losses from investments and
accounts receivable.
The Companys products require customized components that
currently are available from a limited number of sources. The
Company obtains certain key components included in its products
from single vendors.
58
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Shipments to customers outside the United States comprised 45%,
48%, and 51% of the Companys revenue for the years ended
January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008, respectively. Customers outside the
United States represented 59% and 46% of the Companys
gross trade accounts receivable balance as of January 2,
2011 and January 3, 2010, respectively. Sales to
territories outside of the United States are generally
denominated in U.S. dollars. International sales entail a
variety of risks, including currency exchange fluctuations,
longer payment cycles, and greater difficulty in accounts
receivable collection. The Company is also subject to general
geopolitical risks, such as political, social and economic
instability, and changes in diplomatic and trade relations. The
risks of international sales are mitigated in part by the extent
to which sales are geographically distributed.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (on a first in, first
out basis) or market. Inventory includes raw materials and
finished goods that may be used in the research and development
process and such items are expensed as consumed or expired.
Provisions for slow moving, excess, and obsolete inventories are
estimated based on product life cycles, quality issues,
historical experience, and usage forecasts.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, subject to review of
impairment, and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of
the assets (generally three to seven years) using the
straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
computed over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated
useful life of the related assets. Maintenance and repairs are
charged to operations as incurred. When assets are sold, or
otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss
is included in operating expense.
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net
assets acquired. The change in the carrying value of goodwill
during the year ended January 2, 2011 was due to goodwill
recorded in connection with acquisitions consummated in the
year. Intangible assets include acquired technology, customer
relationships, other license agreements, and licensed technology
(capitalized as part of the Affymetrix litigation). The cost of
identified intangible assets is amortized on a straight-line
basis over periods ranging from three to ten years.
The Company regularly performs reviews to determine if the
carrying values of the long-lived assets are impaired. Goodwill
and other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives,
such as IPR&D, are reviewed for impairment at least
annually during the second fiscal quarter, or more frequently if
an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. The
performance of the goodwill impairment test is a two-step
process. The first step of the impairment test involves
comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company
performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to
determine the amount of loss, which involves comparing the
implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying value of
the goodwill. The Company performed its annual impairment test
of goodwill in May of 2010, noting no impairment and has
determined there have been no impairment indicators for goodwill
through January 2, 2011. A review of intangible assets that
have finite useful lives and other long-lived assets is
performed when an event occurs indicating the potential for
impairment. If indicators of impairment exist, the Company
assesses the recoverability of the affected long-lived assets by
determining whether the carrying amount of such assets exceeds
the undiscounted expected future cash flows. If impairment is
indicated, the Company compares the carrying amount to the
estimated fair value of the asset and adjusts the value of the
asset accordingly. Factors that would necessitate an impairment
assessment include a significant decline in the Companys
stock price
59
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and market capitalization compared to its net book value,
significant changes in the ability of a particular asset to
generate positive cash flows, and significant changes in the
Companys strategic business objectives and utilization of
the asset.
Reserve
for Product Warranties
The Company generally provides a one-year warranty on
instruments. Additionally, the Company provides a warranty on
its consumables through the expiry date, which generally ranges
from six to twelve months after the manufacture date. The
Company establishes an accrual for estimated warranty expenses
based on historical experience as well as anticipated product
performance. The Company periodically reviews the adequacy of
its warranty reserve, and adjusts, if necessary, the warranty
percentage and accrual based on actual experience and estimated
costs to be incurred. Warranty expense is recorded as a
component of cost of product revenue. Warranty expenses
associated with extended maintenance contracts for systems are
recorded as cost of service and other revenue as incurred. See
note 6. Warranties for further detailed discussion.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys revenue is generated primarily from the sale
of products and services. Product revenue primarily consists of
sales of instrumentation and consumables used in genetic
analysis. Service and other revenue primarily consists of
revenue received for performing genotyping and sequencing
services, extended warranty sales, and amounts earned under
research agreements with government grants, which are recognized
in the period during which the related costs are incurred.
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In
instances where final acceptance of the product or system is
required, revenue is deferred until all the acceptance criteria
have been met. All revenue is recorded net of any discounts.
Revenue for product sales is recognized generally upon transfer
of title to the customer, provided that no significant
obligations remain and collection of the receivable is
reasonably assured. Revenue for genotyping and sequencing
services is recognized when earned, which is generally at the
time the genotyping or sequencing analysis data is made
available to the customer or agreed upon milestones are reached.
In order to assess whether the price is fixed or determinable,
the Company evaluates whether refund rights exist. If there are
refund rights or payment terms based on future performance, the
Company defers revenue recognition until the price becomes fixed
or determinable. The Company assesses collectibility based on a
number of factors, including past transaction history with the
customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the
Company determines that collection of a payment is not
reasonably assured, revenue recognition is deferred until
receipt of payment.
The Company regularly enters into contracts where revenue is
derived from multiple deliverables including any mix of products
or services. These products or services are generally delivered
within a short time frame, approximately three to six months, of
the contract execution date. Revenue recognition for contracts
with multiple deliverables is based on the individual units of
accounting determined to exist in the contract. A delivered item
is considered a separate unit of accounting when the delivered
item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Items are
considered to have stand-alone value when they are sold
separately by any vendor or when the customer could resell the
item on a stand-alone basis.
For transactions entered into in 2009 and 2010, consideration is
allocated at the inception of the contract to all deliverables
based on their relative selling price. The relative selling
price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price or third-party
evidence of selling
60
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
price if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party
evidence exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the
selling price for the deliverable.
For transactions entered into prior to 2009, consideration was
generally allocated to each unit of accounting based upon its
relative fair value when objective and reliable evidence of fair
value existed for all units of accounting in an arrangement. The
fair value of an item was generally the price charged for the
product, if the item was regularly sold on a stand-alone basis.
In those instances when objective and reliable evidence of fair
value existed for the undelivered items but not for the
delivered items, the residual method was used to allocate the
arrangement consideration. Under the residual method, the amount
of arrangement consideration allocated to the delivered items
equaled the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate
fair value of the undelivered items. When the Company was unable
to establish stand-alone value for delivered items or when fair
value of undelivered items had not been established, revenue was
deferred until all elements were delivered and services had been
performed, or until fair value could objectively be determined
for any remaining undelivered elements.
In order to establish VSOE of selling price, the Company must
regularly sell the product or service on a standalone basis with
a substantial majority priced within a relatively narrow range.
VSOE of selling price is usually the midpoint of that range. If
there are not a sufficient number of standalone sales and VSOE
of selling price cannot be determined, then the Company
considers whether third party evidence can be used to establish
selling price. Due to the lack of similar products and services
sold by other companies within the industry, the Company has
rarely established selling price using third-party evidence. If
neither VSOE nor third party evidence of selling price exists,
the Company determines its best estimate of selling price using
average selling prices over a rolling
12-month
period coupled with an assessment of current market conditions.
If the product or service has no history of sales or if the
sales volume is not sufficient, the Company relies upon prices
set by the Companys pricing committee adjusted for
applicable discounts. The Company recognizes revenue for
delivered elements only when it determines there are no
uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company offered an incentive
with the launch of the HiSeq 2000 that enabled existing Genome
Analyzer customers to trade in their Genome Analyzer and receive
a discount on the purchase of a HiSeq 2000. The incentive was
limited to customers who had purchased a Genome Analyzer as of
the date of the announcement and was the first significant
trade-in program offered by the Company. The Company accounts
for HiSeq 2000 discounts related to the Genome Analyzer trade-in
program in the period in which the HiSeq 2000 revenue is
recognized.
Shipping
and Handling Expenses
Shipping and handling expenses are included in cost of product
revenue.
Research
and Development
Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for
internal and grant-sponsored research and development. Research
and development expenses include personnel expenses, contractor
fees, facilities costs, and utilities. Expenditures relating to
research and development are expensed in the period incurred.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
costs were $6.9 million, $4.2 million, and
$3.4 million for the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, respectively.
61
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leases
Leases are reviewed and classified as capital or operating at
their inception. For leases that contain rent escalations, the
Company records the total rent payable on a straight-line basis
over the term of the lease, which includes the construction
build-out period but excludes lease extension periods. The
difference between rent payments and straight-line rent expense
is recorded in other long-term liabilities. Landlord allowances
are also recorded in other long-term liabilities, which are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a
reduction to rent expense.
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and
liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for the
expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and
credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined using the enacted tax rates in effect for the years
in which those tax assets are expected to be realized. The
effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in the provision for income taxes in
the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred tax assets are regularly assessed to determine the
likelihood they will be recovered from future taxable income. A
valuation allowance is established when the Company believes it
is more likely than not the future realization of all or some of
a deferred tax asset will not be achieved. In evaluating the
ability to recover deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction
which they arise the Company considers all available positive
and negative evidence. Factors reviewed include the cumulative
pre-tax book income for the past three years, scheduled
reversals of deferred tax liabilities, history of earnings and
reliable forecasting, projections of pre-tax book income over
the foreseeable future, and the impact of any feasible and
prudent tax planning strategies.
The Company recognizes excess tax benefits associated with
share-based compensation to stockholders equity only when
realized. When assessing whether excess tax benefits relating to
share-based compensation have been realized, the Company follows
the
with-and-without
approach excluding any indirect effects of the excess tax
deductions. Under this approach, excess tax benefits related to
share-based compensation are not deemed to be realized until
after the utilization of all other tax benefits available to the
Company.
The Company recognizes the impact of a tax position in the
financial statements only if that position is more likely than
not of being sustained upon examination by taxing authorities,
based on the technical merits of the position. Any interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be reflected
in income tax expense.
Functional
Currency
Prior to the third quarter of 2008, the Company identified the
local currency as the functional currency in each of its foreign
subsidiaries, with all translation adjustments recorded as part
of other comprehensive income. Beginning in the third quarter of
2008, the Company reorganized its international structure to
execute a more efficient relationship among product development,
product manufacturing, and sales. This reorganization increased
the foreign subsidiaries dependence on the
U.S. entity for management decisions, financial support,
production assets, and inventory, thereby making the foreign
subsidiaries a direct and integral component of the
U.S. entitys operations. As a result, the Company
reassessed the primary economic environment of its foreign
subsidiaries, resulting in a U.S. dollar functional
currency determination. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008,
the Company remeasures its foreign subsidiaries assets and
liabilities and revenue and expense accounts related to monetary
assets and liabilities to the U.S. dollar and records the
net gains or losses resulting from remeasurement in other
(expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of
62
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
income. Gains or (losses) resulting from remeasurement were
$0.6 million, $(2.3) million, and $3.8 million
for the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010
and December 28, 2008, respectively.
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate risks in the
normal course of business. To manage a portion of the accounting
exposure resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, the Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to
hedge monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These foreign
exchange contracts are carried at fair value and do not qualify
for hedge accounting treatment and are not designated as hedging
instruments. Changes in the value of the derivative are
recognized in other (expense) income, net, in the consolidated
statements of income for the current period, along with an
offsetting gain or loss on the underlying assets or liabilities.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model
to estimate the fair value of stock options granted and stock
purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). This
model incorporates various assumptions including expected
volatility, expected life of an award, expected dividends, and
the risk-free interest rates. The Company determines volatility
by equally weighing the historical and implied volatility of the
Companys common stock. The historical volatility of the
Companys common stock over the most recent period is
generally commensurate with the estimated expected life of the
Companys stock awards, adjusted for the impact of unusual
fluctuations not reasonably expected to recur and other relevant
factors. The implied volatility is calculated from the implied
market volatility of exchange-traded call options on the
Companys common stock. The expected life of an award is
based on historical forfeiture experience, exercise activity,
and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards. The fair
value of restricted stock units granted is based on the market
price of our common stock on the date of grant. The Company
amortizes the fair value of share-based compensation on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
awards.
The assumptions used for the specified reporting periods and the
resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of
options granted and for stock purchases under the ESPP during
those periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest rate stock options
|
|
2.05 - 2.73%
|
|
1.69 - 1.97%
|
|
2.31 -3.52%
|
Interest rate stock purchases
|
|
0.17 - 0.48%
|
|
0.28 - 2.90%
|
|
1.88 -4.71%
|
Volatility stock options
|
|
46 - 48%
|
|
55 - 58%
|
|
51 - 65%
|
Volatility stock purchases
|
|
46 - 48%
|
|
48 - 58%
|
|
53 - 69%
|
Expected life stock options
|
|
6 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
5 - 6 years
|
Expected life stock purchases
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted
|
|
$18.82
|
|
$14.79
|
|
$18.31
|
Weighted average fair value per share of employee stock purchases
|
|
$11.10
|
|
$9.24
|
|
$11.45
|
As of January 2, 2011, approximately $151.8 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options,
restricted stock units, and ESPP shares issued to date is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 2.47 years.
63
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total share-based compensation expense for all stock awards
consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
$
|
5,378
|
|
|
$
|
4,776
|
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
Cost of service and other revenue
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
25,428
|
|
|
|
19,960
|
|
|
|
14,086
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
35,561
|
|
|
|
28,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before taxes
|
|
|
71,645
|
|
|
|
60,811
|
|
|
|
47,688
|
|
Related income tax benefits
|
|
|
(25,231
|
)
|
|
|
(20,121
|
)
|
|
|
(15,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
46,414
|
|
|
$
|
40,690
|
|
|
$
|
31,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income per Share
On July 22, 2008, the Company announced a
two-for-one
stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend with a record
date of September 10, 2008 and a distribution date of
September 22, 2008. Share and per share amounts have been
restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
Basic net income or loss per share is computed by dividing net
income or loss by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per
share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period
increased to include dilutive potential common shares using the
treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares consist
of stock options with combined exercise prices and unrecognized
compensation expense that are less than the average market price
of the Companys common stock, restricted stock units with
unrecognized compensation expense, convertible debt when the
average market price of the Companys common stock is above
the conversion price of $21.83 and warrants with exercise prices
that are less than the average market price of the
Companys common stock. Under the treasury stock method,
the amount that must be paid to exercise stock options and
warrants, the average amount of compensation expense for future
services that the Company has not yet recognized for stock
options and restricted stock units, and the amount of estimated
tax benefits that will be recorded in additional paid-in capital
when the awards become deductible are assumed to be used to
repurchase shares. In loss periods, basic net loss per share and
diluted net loss per share are identical since the effect of
dilutive potential common shares is anti-dilutive and therefore
excluded.
64
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the calculation of weighted average
shares used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
123,581
|
|
|
|
123,154
|
|
|
|
116,855
|
|
Plus: Effect of dilutive Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
9,058
|
|
|
|
6,497
|
|
|
|
6,653
|
|
Plus: Effect of dilutive equity awards
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
Plus: Effect of dilutive warrants sold in connection with the
Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
Plus: Effect of dilutive warrants assumed in the acquisition of
Solexa
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in calculating diluted net income
per share
|
|
|
143,433
|
|
|
|
137,096
|
|
|
|
133,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares excluded from calculation due to
anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other
comprehensive income. The Company has disclosed comprehensive
income as a component of stockholders equity. Accumulative
other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets at
January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010 includes
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gains and losses on the Companys
available-for-sale
securities.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
|
$
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Balance
Sheet Account Details
|
Investments
The following is a summary of short-term investments (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
261,890
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
$
|
261,697
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
329,823
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
330,758
|
|
U.S. treasury securities
|
|
|
52,938
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
644,651
|
|
|
$
|
1,346
|
|
|
$
|
(655
|
)
|
|
$
|
645,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
289,101
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
$
|
289,701
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
190,949
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
192,822
|
|
U.S. treasury securities
|
|
|
11,487
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
491,537
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
493,994
|
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,129
|
)
|
|
|
48,771
|
|
Put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
(6,129
|
)
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
546,437
|
|
|
$
|
8,882
|
|
|
$
|
(6,425
|
)
|
|
$
|
548,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale
Securities
As of January 2, 2011 the Company had 83
available-for-sale
securities in a gross unrealized loss position, all of which had
been in such position for less than twelve months. There were no
unrealized losses due to credit issues for the periods
presented. There were no impairments considered
other-than-temporary
as it is more likely than not the Company will hold the
securities until maturity or a recovery of the cost basis. The
following table shows the fair values and the gross unrealized
losses of the Companys available-for- sale securities that
were in an unrealized loss position as of January 2, 2011
and January 3, 2010 aggregated by investment category (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2011
|
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Debt securities in government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
127,756
|
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,783
|
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
92,199
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
26,488
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
U.S. treasury securities
|
|
|
13,490
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
233,445
|
|
|
$
|
(655
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,742
|
|
|
$
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains and losses are determined based on the specific
identification method and are reported in interest income in the
consolidated statements of income. Gross realized gains on sales
of available-for sale securities for the year ended
January 2, 2011 were $1.7 million and gross realized
losses were immaterial. Gross realized gains and losses on sales
of
available-for-sale
securities were immaterial for each of the years ended
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008.
66
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contractual maturities of
available-for-sale
securities as of January 2, 2011 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
230,421
|
|
After one but within five years
|
|
|
414,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
645,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
Securities
As of January 3, 2010, the Companys short-term
investments included $54.9 million (at cost) of auction
rate securities issued primarily by municipalities and
universities. In November 2008, the Company signed an agreement
granting the Company an option to sell all of its auction rate
securities at par value to UBS during the period of
June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. To account for the
option, the Company recorded a separate freestanding asset (put
option). On July 1, 2010, the Company exercised its option
to sell all of its remaining auction rate securities at par.
From January 3, 2010 through July 1, 2010 the increase
in the fair value of the auction rate securities was equal to
the decrease in the fair value of the put option. As such, no
gain or loss was recorded as a result of the exercise of the put
option and the sale of the auction rate securities.
Changes in the fair value of the Companys auction rate
securities and put option from January 3, 2010 through
January 2, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of auction rate securities and put option as of
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
54,900
|
|
Auction rate securities redeemed by issuer
|
|
|
(32,100
|
)
|
Auction rate securities sold upon the exercise of put option on
July 1, 2010
|
|
|
(22,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of January 2, 2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost-Method
Investments
As of January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, the
aggregate carrying amounts of the Companys cost-method
investments in non-publicly traded companies were
$32.0 million and $19.9 million, respectively. The
Companys cost-method investments are assessed for
impairment quarterly. The Company does not estimate the fair
value of cost-method investments if there are no identified
events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant
adverse effect on the fair value of the investments. See
Investments in note 5. Impairment for
more information on the impairment of cost-method investments.
The Company includes cost-method investments in other long term
assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accounts receivable from product and service sales
|
|
$
|
165,117
|
|
|
$
|
157,536
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
167,284
|
|
|
|
159,149
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
165,598
|
|
|
$
|
157,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventory
Inventory, net, consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
56,435
|
|
|
$
|
39,839
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
73,759
|
|
|
|
52,059
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
24,290
|
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory, gross
|
|
|
154,484
|
|
|
|
103,373
|
|
Reserve for inventory
|
|
|
(12,273
|
)
|
|
|
(10,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory, net
|
|
$
|
142,211
|
|
|
$
|
92,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
55,681
|
|
|
$
|
55,322
|
|
Manufacturing and laboratory equipment
|
|
|
114,108
|
|
|
|
92,956
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
|
37,071
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
6,732
|
|
|
|
5,993
|
|
Leased equipment
|
|
|
13,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, gross
|
|
|
231,378
|
|
|
|
191,342
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(101,504
|
)
|
|
|
(74,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
129,874
|
|
|
$
|
117,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $34.2 million, $24.5 million
and $17.3 million for the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, respectively.
Accrued
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accrued compensation expenses
|
|
$
|
49,368
|
|
|
$
|
32,487
|
|
Deferred revenue, current portion
|
|
|
45,863
|
|
|
|
27,445
|
|
Reserve for product warranties
|
|
|
16,761
|
|
|
|
10,215
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
14,900
|
|
|
|
6,121
|
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
13,277
|
|
|
|
12,109
|
|
Acquisition related contingent consideration liability
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,476
|
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
156,164
|
|
|
$
|
98,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 30, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of
Helixis, a company developing a high-performance, low-cost, real
time PCR system used for nucleic acid analysis. Total
consideration for the acquisition at the closing date was
approximately $86.7 million, including $70.0 million
in cash (net of $2.6 million of cash acquired) and
$14.1 million for the fair value of contingent
consideration payments that could range from $0 to
$35 million based on the achievement of certain
revenue-based milestones by December 31, 2011. Using
information available at the close of the acquisition, the
Company allocated approximately $2.3 million of the
consideration to tangible assets, net of liabilities, and
approximately $28.0 million to identified intangible assets
that will be amortized over a useful life of 10 years. The
Company also recorded a $10.7 million deferred tax
liability to reflect the tax impact of the identified intangible
assets that will not generate tax deductible amortization
expense and an $8.7 million deferred tax asset which
primarily relates to acquired net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company recorded the excess consideration of approximately
$58.4 million as goodwill, which is not deductible for
income tax purposes.
Prior to the acquisition, the Company had an equity interest in
Helixis with a cost basis of $2.0 million that was
accounted for under the cost method of accounting. The Company
recognized a gain of $2.9 million, which was included in
other (expense) income, net, in its consolidated statement of
income as a result of revaluing the Companys equity
interest in Helixis on the acquisition date.
On July 28, 2010, the Company completed an acquisition of
another privately-held, development stage entity. Total
consideration for the acquisition was $22.0 million. As a
result of this transaction, the company recorded an in-process
research and development (IPR&D) asset of
$21.4 million in other assets (long-term). In determining
the fair value of the IPR&D, various factors were
considered, such as future revenue contributions, additional
research and development costs to be incurred, and contributory
asset charges. The fair value of the IPR&D was calculated
using an income approach, and the rate used to discount net
future cash flows to their present values was based on a
risk-adjusted rate of return of approximately 28%. Significant
factors considered in the calculation of the rate of return
include the weighted average cost of capital, the weighted
average return on assets, the internal rate of return, as well
as the risks inherent in the development process for
development-stage entities of similar sizes.
IPR&D will not be amortized until the development efforts
are complete and until then, the Company will perform an annual
impairment test of the asset, or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. The impairment test will involve a comparison of the
fair value of the asset with its carrying amount. If its
carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall
be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Upon completion
of the related development efforts, the Company will start
amortizing the IPR&D based on an estimated useful life.
Through January 2, 2011, there was no indication of
impairment of IPR&D and no impairment loss has been
recorded.
In 2008, the Company completed an acquisition of another
development-stage company. At the time of the acquisition, the
Company paid $25.8 million in cash, including transaction
costs. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance
effective at that time, the Company recorded a charge of
$24.7 million for purchased in-process research and
development (IPR&D). As part of the acquisition agreement,
Illumina agreed to pay the former shareholders of the entity up
to an additional $35.0 million in contingent cash
consideration based on the achievement of certain milestones. As
contingent consideration payments are made,
69
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
they are recorded as IPR&D charges and compensation
expenses. IPR&D and compensation expenses related to such
contingent consideration recorded in the past three years are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2008
|
|
IPR&D(1)
|
|
$
|
1,325
|
|
|
$
|
11,325
|
|
|
$
|
24,660
|
|
Compensation expense(2)
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
IPR&D expense is included in acquisition related (gain)
expense, net in the consolidated statements of income. |
|
(2) |
|
Compensation expense associated with the acquisition is included
in research and development expenses in the consolidated
statements of income. |
The Companys intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are
comprised primarily of licensed technology from the Affymetrix
settlement entered into on January 9, 2008, acquired core
technology and customer relationships from the acquisition of
Solexa, and acquired core technology from the acquisition of
Helixis. As a result of the Affymetrix settlement, the Company
agreed, without admitting liability, to make a one-time payment
to Affymetrix, of which $36.0 million was recorded as
licensed technology and classified as an intangible asset. The
effective life of the licensed technology extends through 2015,
the final expiry date of all patents considered in valuing the
intangible asset. Amortization related to the Affymetrix
licensed technology is recorded on a straight-line basis.
In connection with the acquisition of Helixis. in April 2010,
the Company recorded an additional core technology of
$28.0 million with a useful life of approximately
10 years. Acquired core technologies and customer
relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis over
their useful lives.
The following is a summary of the Companys amortizable
intangible assets as of the respective balance sheet dates (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2011
|
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangibles,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangibles,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Licensed technology
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
|
$
|
(15,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,151
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
|
$
|
(11,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,180
|
|
Core technology
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
51,500
|
|
|
|
(10,604
|
)
|
|
|
40,896
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
23,500
|
|
|
|
(6,854
|
)
|
|
|
16,646
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
(875
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
License agreements
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
10,654
|
|
|
|
(1,677
|
)
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
(1,519
|
)
|
|
|
2,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,054
|
|
|
$
|
(29,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,856
|
|
|
$
|
(21,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense associated with the intangible assets was
$7.8 million, $6.7 million, and $10.4 million for
the years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008, respectively.
70
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The estimated annual amortization of intangible assets for the
next five years is shown in the following table (in thousands).
Actual amortization expense to be reported in future periods
could differ from these estimates as a result of acquisitions,
divestitures, asset impairments, and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
10,071
|
|
2012
|
|
|
10,285
|
|
2013
|
|
|
10,270
|
|
2014
|
|
|
10,251
|
|
2015
|
|
|
10,251
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
18,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
70,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company determined that a
$6.0 million cost-method investment and a related
$6.8 million note receivable with interest receivable of
$0.4 million were below carrying value and the impairment
was
other-than-temporary.
This determination was based upon continued shortfalls from
revenue plans coupled with events in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2010 that created uncertainty regarding the entitys
ability to obtain additional funding in a required timeframe for
the entity to continue operations. As a result, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $13.2 million in other
(expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of income
for the year ended January 2, 2011.
Manufacturing
Equipment
During the year ended December 28, 2008, the Company
implemented next-generation imaging and decoding systems to be
used in manufacturing. These systems were developed to increase
existing capacity and allow the Company to transition to the
Infinium High-Density (HD) product line. As a result of this
transition, the demand for products manufactured on the previous
infrastructure was reduced and certain systems were no longer
being utilized. A non-cash impairment charge of
$4.1 million was recorded in the year ended
December 28, 2008 for the excess machinery. This charge is
included as a separate line item in the Companys
consolidated statement of income. There was no change to useful
lives and related depreciation expenses of the remaining assets
as the Company believes these estimates are currently reflective
of the period the assets will be used in operations.
The Company generally provides a one-year warranty on
instruments. Additionally, the Company provides a warranty on
its consumables through the expiry date, which generally ranges
from six to twelve months after the manufacture date. At the
time revenue is recognized, the Company establishes an accrual
for estimated warranty expenses based on historical experience
as well as anticipated product performance. The Company
periodically reviews the adequacy of our warranty reserve, and
adjusts, if necessary, the warranty percentage and accrual based
on actual experience and estimated costs to be incurred.
Warranty expense is recorded as a component of cost of product
revenue. Estimated warranty expenses associated with extended
maintenance contracts for systems are recorded as a cost of
service and other revenue as incurred.
71
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in the Companys reserve for product warranties
from January 1, 2008 through January 2, 2011 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,716
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
|
|
13,044
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
|
|
(8,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 28, 2008
|
|
|
8,203
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
|
|
14,613
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
|
|
(12,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 3, 2010
|
|
|
10,215
|
|
Additions charged to cost of revenue
|
|
|
25,146
|
|
Repairs and replacements
|
|
|
(18,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 2, 2011
|
|
$
|
16,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Convertible
Senior Notes
|
On February 16, 2007, the Company issued
$400.0 million principal amount of 0.625% convertible
senior notes due 2014. The net proceeds from the offering, after
deducting the initial purchasers discount and offering
expenses, were approximately $390.3 million. The Company
pays 0.625% interest per annum on the principal amount of the
notes, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15
and August 15 of each year. The notes mature on
February 15, 2014.
The notes are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares
of the Companys common stock, $0.01 par value per
share, based on a conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of
45.8058 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which
represents a conversion price of approximately $21.83 per
share), only in the following circumstances and to the following
extent: (1) during the five
business-day
period after any five consecutive
trading-day
period (the measurement period) in which the trading price per
note for each day of such measurement period was less than 97%
of the product of the last reported sale price of the
Companys common stock and the conversion rate on each such
day; (2) during any calendar quarter, if the last reported
sale price of the Companys common stock for 20 or more
trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending
on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar
quarter exceeds 130% of the applicable conversion price in
effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
calendar quarter; (3) upon the occurrence of specified
events; and (4) at any time on or after November 15,
2013 through the third scheduled trading day immediately
preceding the maturity date. The requirements of the second
condition above were satisfied during each of the calendar
quarters of 2010 and the first, second and third quarters of
2009. Accordingly, the notes were and continue to be convertible
during the period from, and including, April 1, 2009
through, and including, December 31, 2009 and again during
the period April 1, 2010 through, and including,
March 31, 2011. Additionally, these same requirements were
satisfied during the third quarter of 2008, and, as a result,
the notes were convertible during the period from, and
including, October 1, 2008 through, and including,
December 31, 2008. On December 29, 2008, a noteholder
converted notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$10.0 million. On February 4, 2009, the settlement
date, we paid the noteholder the conversion value of the notes
in cash, up to the principal amount of the notes. The excess of
the conversion value over the principal amount, totaling
$2.9 million, was paid in shares of common stock. This
equity dilution upon conversion of the notes was offset by the
reacquisition of the shares under the convertible note hedge
transactions entered into in connection with the offering of the
notes.
The hedge transaction entered with the initial purchasers
and/or their
affiliates (the hedge counterparties) entitles the Company to
purchase up to 18,322,320 shares of the Companys
common stock at a strike price of approximately $21.83 per
share, subject to adjustment. In addition, the Company sold to
these hedge
72
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
counterparties warrants exercisable, on a cashless basis, for up
to 18,322,320 shares of the Companys common stock at
a strike price of $31.435 per share, subject to adjustment. The
cost of the hedge transaction that was not covered by the
proceeds from the sale of the warrants was approximately
$46.6 million and was reflected as a reduction of
additional paid-in capital. The hedge transaction is expected to
reduce the potential equity dilution upon conversion of the
notes to the extent the Company exercises the hedge to purchase
shares from the hedge counterparties to deliver to converting
noteholders. However, the warrants could have a dilutive effect
on the Companys earnings per share to the extent that the
price of the Companys common stock exceeds the strike
price of the warrants.
As of January 2, 2011, the principal amount of the
convertible senior notes was $390.0 million due to
conversion of $10.0 million of the notes during the first
quarter of 2009. The unamortized discount was $78.4 million
resulting in a net carrying amount of the liability component of
$311.6 million. As of January 3, 2010, the principal
amount of the notes was $390.0 million and the unamortized
discount was $99.8 million, resulting in a net carrying
amount of the liability of $290.2 million. Upon the
conversion, the Company recorded a gain of $0.8 million in
the first quarter of 2009, calculated as the difference between
the carrying amount of the converted notes and their estimated
fair value as of the settlement date. To measure the fair value
of the converted notes as of the settlement date, the Company
calculated an interest rate of 11.3% using Level 2
Observable Inputs. This rate was applied to the converted notes
and coupon interest rate using the same present value technique
used in the issuance date valuation. The remaining period over
which the discount on the liability component will be amortized
is 3.12 years.
Operating
Leases
The Company leases office and manufacturing facilities under
various noncancellable operating lease agreements. Facility
leases generally provide for periodic rent increases, and many
contain escalation clauses and renewal options. Certain leases
require the Company to pay property taxes and routine
maintenance. The Company is headquartered in San Diego,
California and leases facilities in San Diego, California;
Hayward, California; Carlsbad, California; Branford,
Connecticut; the United Kingdom; the Netherlands; Japan;
Singapore; Australia; and China.
Annual future minimum payments under these operating leases as
of January 2, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
13,965
|
|
2012
|
|
|
15,237
|
|
2013
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
2014
|
|
|
20,926
|
|
2015
|
|
|
20,059
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
406,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
499,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense, net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale
of property, was $14.7 million, $13.6 million, and
$10.7 million for the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, respectively.
On December 30, 2010, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for a new corporate headquarters facility located in
San Diego, California. The lease has a target commencement
date of November 1, 2011 and has an initial term of
20 years with four five-year options to extend. There is a
one-time option to terminate the lease after 15 years in
exchange for an early termination fee. The lease includes two
existing office
73
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
buildings and a central plant building with approximately
346,600 square feet. The Company has also agreed to lease a
third office building to be built at this facility containing
approximately 123,400 rentable square feet. The Company has
the right to further expand the premises and lease one or more
of three additional office buildings that may be built at this
facility. Included in the table above are future minimum lease
payments during the initial term of the lease, which are
expected to total approximately $355.9 million, excluding
further expansion beyond the third building, and taking no
consideration of tenant improvement allowances of approximately
$21.9 million. The Company will capitalize the leasehold
improvements and amortize them over the shorter of the lease
term or their expected useful life. The leasehold improvement
allowances will reduce rent expense over the initial lease term.
Lease commitments of $108.3 million related to the lease
for the Companys current headquarters are also included in
the table above. The Company plans to cease the use of the
facility near the end of 2011 and the Company is further
obligated for certain ongoing operating costs prior to any
sublease that may be obtained. Upon cease-use of the facility,
the Company will record an estimated loss for the present value
of the expected shortfall between the remaining lease payments
obligation and estimated sublease rental during the remaining
lease period, adjusted for deferred rents and leasehold
improvements.
Common
Stock
On July 22, 2008, the Company announced a
two-for-one
stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend with a record
date of September 10, 2008 and a distribution date of
September 22, 2008. Share and per share amounts have been
restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
On August 12, 2008, a total of 8,050,000 shares were
sold to the public at a public offering price of $43.75 per
share, raising net proceeds to the Company of
$342.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses.
On January 2, 2011, the Company had 126,606,851 shares
of common stock outstanding, excluding treasury shares.
Stock
Options
On January 2, 2011, the Company had three active stock
plans: the 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan (the 2005 Stock Plan),
the 2005 Solexa Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005 Solexa Equity
Plan), and the New Hire Stock and Incentive Plan. As of
January 2, 2011, options to purchase 7,535,584 shares
remained available for future grant under the 2005 Stock Plan
and 2005 Solexa Equity Plan. There is no set number of shares
reserved for issuance under the New Hire Stock and Incentive
Plan.
Stock options granted at the time of hire primarily vest over a
four or five-year period, with 20% or 25% of options vesting on
the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining
options vesting monthly over the remaining vesting period. Stock
options granted subsequent to hiring primarily vest monthly over
a four or five-year period. Each grant of options has a maximum
term of ten years, measured from the applicable grant date,
subject to earlier termination if the optionees service
with us ceases. Vesting in all cases is subject to the
individuals continued service to us through the vesting
date. The Company satisfies option exercises through the
issuance of new shares.
74
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys stock option activity under all stock option
plans from January 1, 2008 through January 2, 2011 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
20,847,868
|
|
|
$
|
12.13
|
|
|
$
|
8.13
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,091,108
|
|
|
|
34.23
|
|
|
|
18.01
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,571,855
|
)
|
|
|
8.52
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,232,917
|
)
|
|
|
19.93
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
|
|
|
18,134,204
|
|
|
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,560,024
|
|
|
|
28.86
|
|
|
|
14.74
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,965,606
|
)
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(639,184
|
)
|
|
|
14.88
|
|
|
|
9.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
16,089,438
|
|
|
|
18.59
|
|
|
|
11.07
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,045,489
|
|
|
|
39.11
|
|
|
|
18.82
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,541,276
|
)
|
|
|
16.65
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(711,350
|
)
|
|
|
21.76
|
|
|
|
11.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2011
|
|
|
11,882,301
|
|
|
$
|
22.83
|
|
|
$
|
12.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 2, 2011, outstanding options to purchase
6,950,184 shares were exercisable with a weighted average
per share exercise price of $17.70. The weighted average
remaining life in years of options outstanding and exercisable
is 6.51 years and 5.67 years, respectively, as of
January 2, 2011.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options
exercisable as of January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010
was $481.4 million and $317.2 million, respectively.
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the
Companys closing stock price per share on the last trading
day of the fiscal period, which was $63.34 as of
December 31, 2010, and the exercise price multiplied by the
number of options outstanding. Total intrinsic value of options
exercised was $156.9 million, $73.4 million, and
$136.6 million for the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, respectively.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In February 2000, the board of directors and stockholders
adopted the 2000 ESPP. A total of 15,467,426 shares of the
Companys common stock have been reserved for issuance
under the ESPP. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase
common stock at a discount, but only through payroll deductions,
during defined offering periods.
The price at which stock is purchased under the ESPP is equal to
85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or
last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. The initial
offering period commenced in July 2000. In addition, beginning
with fiscal 2001, the ESPP provides for annual increases of
shares available for issuance by the lesser of 3% of the number
of outstanding shares of the Companys common stock on the
last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year,
3,000,000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the
Companys board of directors. Shares totaling 372,544,
359,713, and 276,198 were issued under the ESPP during fiscal
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. As of January 2, 2011
and January 3, 2010, there were 16,061,905 shares and
13,434,499 shares available for issuance under the ESPP,
respectively.
75
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Stock Units
In 2007 the Company began granting restricted stock units
(RSUs), pursuant to its 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan as part of
its periodic employee equity compensation review program. RSUs
are share awards that, upon vesting, will deliver to the holder
shares of the Companys common stock. RSUs generally vest
15% on the first anniversary of the grant date, 20% on the
second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third
anniversary of the grant date, and 35% on the fourth anniversary
of the grant date. The Company satisfies RSU vesting through the
issuance of new shares.
A summary of the Companys RSU activity and related
information from January 1, 2008 through January 2,
2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock Units(1)
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
394,500
|
|
|
$
|
25.68
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
1,287,504
|
|
|
|
34.53
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(55,638
|
)
|
|
|
25.67
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(47,090
|
)
|
|
|
32.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
|
|
|
1,579,276
|
|
|
|
32.68
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
1,292,473
|
|
|
|
32.25
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(246,055
|
)
|
|
|
32.33
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(116,986
|
)
|
|
|
33.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
2,508,708
|
|
|
|
32.45
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
1,353,583
|
|
|
|
50.74
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(510,113
|
)
|
|
|
32.10
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(242,946
|
)
|
|
|
33.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2011
|
|
|
3,109,232
|
|
|
$
|
40.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each RSU represents the fair market value of one share of common
stock. |
Based on the closing price per share of the Companys
common stock of $63.34 and $30.68 on December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, the total pretax intrinsic
value of all outstanding RSUs as of January 2, 2011 and
January 3, 2010 was $125.6 million and
$81.1 million, respectively.
Warrants
In conjunction with its acquisition of Solexa, Inc. on
January 26, 2007, the Company assumed 4,489,686 warrants
issued by Solexa prior to the acquisition. During the year ended
January 2, 2011, there were 1,577,712 warrants exercised,
resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of approximately
$16.0 million.
A summary of all warrants outstanding as of January 2, 2011
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
505,442
|
|
$
|
10.91
|
|
|
|
1/19/2011
|
|
18,322,320(1)
|
|
$
|
31.44
|
|
|
|
2/15/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,827,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents warrants sold in connection with the offering of the
Companys convertible senior notes (See note 7.
Convertible Senior Notes). |
Treasury
Stock
In October 2008, the board of directors authorized a
$120.0 million stock repurchase program. In fiscal 2008,
the Company repurchased 3.1 million shares for
$70.8 million under the program.
In July 2009, the board of directors authorized a
$75.0 million stock repurchase program and concurrently
terminated the $120.0 million stock repurchase program
authorized in October 2008. In November 2009, upon the
completion of the repurchase program authorized in July 2009,
our board of directors authorized an additional
$100.0 million stock repurchase program. In fiscal 2009, the
Company repurchased a total of 6.1 million shares for
$175.1 million, under both programs in open-market
transactions or through privately negotiated transactions in
compliance with
Rule 10b-18
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This program expired
at the end of 2009.
In July 2010, the Companys board of directors authorized a
$200 million stock repurchase program, with
$100 million allocated to repurchasing Company common stock
under a 10b5-1 plan over a 12 month period and
$100 million allocated to repurchasing Company common stock
at managements discretion during open trading windows. In
fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 0.8 million shares for
$44.0 million under the program authorized in July 2010.
Stockholder
Rights Plan
On May 3, 2001, the board of directors of the Company
declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a
Right) for each outstanding share of common stock of the
Company. The dividend was payable on May 14, 2001 to the
stockholders of record on that date. Each Right entitles the
registered holder to purchase from the Company one unit
consisting of one-thousandth of a share of its Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a price of $100 per
unit. The Rights will be exercisable if a person or group
hereafter acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the
outstanding common stock of the Company or announces an offer
for 15% or more of the outstanding common stock. If a person or
group acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common stock of
the Company, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase, at
the exercise price of the Right, a number of shares of common
stock having a market value of two times the exercise price of
the Right. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other
business combination transaction after a person acquires 15% or
more of the Companys common stock, each Right will entitle
its holder to purchase, at the Rights then-current
exercise price, a number of common shares of the acquiring
company which at the time of such transaction have a market
value of two times the exercise price of the Right. The board of
directors will be entitled to redeem the Rights at a price of
$0.01 per Right at any time before any such person acquires
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding common
stock. The Rights expire on May 14, 2011 unless such date
is extended or the Rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by
the Company.
From time to time, the Company is party to litigation and other
legal proceedings in the ordinary course, and incidental to the
conduct, of its business. While the results of any litigation or
other legal proceedings are uncertain, the Company does not
believe the ultimate resolution of any pending legal matters is
likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial
position or results of operations.
77
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income before income taxes summarized by region is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
109,068
|
|
|
$
|
65,081
|
|
|
$
|
46,205
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
76,311
|
|
|
|
49,044
|
|
|
|
26,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
185,379
|
|
|
$
|
114,125
|
|
|
$
|
72,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
39,476
|
|
|
$
|
43,565
|
|
|
$
|
13,868
|
|
State
|
|
|
8,607
|
|
|
|
2,511
|
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
6,204
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision
|
|
|
54,413
|
|
|
|
52,280
|
|
|
|
21,044
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
(14,607
|
)
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
State
|
|
|
(6,808
|
)
|
|
|
5,184
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
(1,013
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit)
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
(10,436
|
)
|
|
|
12,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision
|
|
$
|
60,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,844
|
|
|
$
|
33,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes reconciles to the amount computed
by applying the federal statutory rate to income before taxes as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax at federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
64,881
|
|
|
$
|
39,944
|
|
|
$
|
25,440
|
|
State, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
|
|
4,275
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
Research and other credits
|
|
|
(5,859
|
)
|
|
|
(4,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,060
|
)
|
Acquired in-process research & development
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
9,508
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,497
|
)
|
|
|
(1,967
|
)
|
|
|
(6,892
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(3,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
|
|
(5,400
|
)
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision
|
|
$
|
60,488
|
|
|
$
|
41,844
|
|
|
$
|
33,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
$
|
11,898
|
|
|
$
|
15,869
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
18,329
|
|
|
|
18,681
|
|
Other accruals and reserves
|
|
|
22,134
|
|
|
|
17,813
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
23,829
|
|
|
|
25,442
|
|
Impairment of cost-method investment
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other amortization
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
|
|
14,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
90,784
|
|
|
|
97,001
|
|
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(4,986
|
)
|
|
|
(14,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
85,798
|
|
|
|
82,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased intangible amortization
|
|
|
(22,605
|
)
|
|
|
(5,043
|
)
|
Accrued litigation settlements
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,810
|
)
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
(3,191
|
)
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
|
|
(2,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(32,933
|
)
|
|
|
(15,564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
52,865
|
|
|
$
|
66,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than
not the future realization of all or some of the deferred tax
assets will not be achieved. The evaluation of the need for a
valuation allowance is performed on a
jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction
basis, and includes a review of all available positive and
negative evidence. During 2010, the valuation allowance
decreased by $9.9 million primarily due to increased
profitability of certain foreign subsidiaries related to the
corporate restructuring implemented during the fourth quarter.
Based on the available evidence as of January 2, 2011, the
Company was not able to conclude it is more likely than not
certain U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets will be
realized. Therefore, the Company recorded a valuation allowance
of $1.9 million and $3.1 million against certain
U.S. and foreign net deferred tax assets, respectively.
As of January 2, 2011, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal and state tax purposes of
$37.5 million and $161.7 million, respectively, which
begin to expire in 2020 and 2017, respectively, unless utilized
prior. In addition, the Company also had U.S. federal and
state research and development tax credit carryforwards of
$13.7 million and $28.7 million, respectively, which
begin to expire in 2027 and 2019, respectively, unless utilized
prior.
Pursuant to Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue
Code, utilization of the Companys net operating loss and
credits may be subject to annual limitations in the event of any
significant future changes in its ownership structure. These
annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating
losses and credits prior to utilization. The deferred tax assets
as of January 2, 2011 are net of any previous limitations
due to Section 382 and 383.
The Company recognizes excess tax benefits associated with
share-based compensation to stockholders equity only when
realized. When assessing whether excess tax benefits relating to
share-based compensation
79
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
have been realized, the Company follows the
with-and-without
approach excluding any indirect effects of the excess tax
deductions. Under this approach, excess tax benefits related to
share-based compensation are not deemed to be realized until
after the utilization of all other tax benefits available to the
Company. During 2010, the Company realized $42.4 million of
such excess tax benefits, and accordingly recorded a
corresponding credit to additional paid in capital. As of
January 2, 2011, the Company has $16.7 million of
unrealized excess tax benefits associated with share-based
compensation. These tax benefits will be accounted for as a
credit to additional paid-in capital, if and when realized,
rather than a reduction of the provision for income taxes.
The Companys manufacturing operations in Singapore operate
under various tax holidays and incentives that begin to expire
in 2018. For the year ended January 2, 2011, these tax
holidays and incentives resulted in an approximate
$2.3 million decrease to the provision for income taxes and
an increase to net income per diluted share of $0.02.
Residual U.S. income taxes have not been provided on
$66.0 million of undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries as of January 2, 2011, since the earnings are
considered to be indefinitely invested in the operations of such
subsidiaries.
The following table summarizes the gross amount of the
Companys uncertain tax positions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,760
|
|
|
$
|
9,402
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
Increases related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
5,903
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
22,729
|
|
|
$
|
11,760
|
|
|
$
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 2, 2011, $18.3 million of the
Companys uncertain tax positions would reduce the
Companys annual effective tax rate, if recognized.
The Company does not expect its uncertain tax positions to
change significantly over the next 12 months. Any interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be
reflected in income tax expense. As of January 2, 2011,
minimal interest was accrued related to the Companys
uncertain tax positions. Tax years 1995 to 2010 remain subject
to future examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which
the Company is subject to tax.
|
|
12.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Retirement
Plan
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan covering substantially all
of its employees. Company contributions to the plan are
discretionary. During the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, the Company
made matching contributions of $4.2 million,
$3.3 million, and $2.6 million, respectively.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The Company adopted the Illumina, Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan (the Plan) that became effective January 1, 2008.
Eligible participants, which include the Companys senior
level employees and members of the board of directors, can
contribute up to 80% of their base salary and 100% of all other
forms of compensation into the Plan, including bonus, equity
awards, commission and director fees. The Company has agreed to
credit the participants contributions with earnings that
reflect the performance of certain
80
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
independent investment funds. On a discretionary basis, the
Company may also make employer contributions to participant
accounts in any amount determined by the Company. The vesting
schedules of employer contributions are at the sole discretion
of the Compensation Committee. However, all employer
contributions shall become 100% vested upon the occurrence of
the participants disability, death or retirement or a
change in control of the Company. The benefits under this plan
are unsecured. Participants are generally eligible to receive
payment of their vested benefit at the end of their elected
deferral period or after termination of their employment with
the Company for any reason or at a later date to comply with the
restrictions of Section 409A. As of January 2, 2011,
no employer contributions were made to the Plan.
In January 2008, the Company also established a rabbi trust for
the benefit of the participants under the Plan. In accordance
with authoritative guidance related to consolidation of variable
interest entities and accounting for deferred compensation
arrangements where amounts earned are held in a rabbi trust and
invested, the Company has included the assets of the rabbi trust
in its consolidated balance sheet since the trusts
inception. As of January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010,
the assets of the trust were $6.1 million and $4.0 million,
respectively, and liabilities of the Company were
$5.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The
assets and liabilities are classified as other assets and
accrued liabilities, respectively, on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the values of the assets
held by the rabbi trust are recorded in other (expense) income,
net in the consolidated statement of income.
|
|
13.
|
Segment
Information, Geographic Data, and Significant
Customers
|
The Company is organized in two business segments, the Life
Sciences Business Unit and Diagnostics Business Unit. The Life
Sciences Business Unit includes all products and services that
are primarily related to the research market, namely the product
lines based on the Companys sequencing, BeadArray,
VeraCode, and real-time PCR technologies. The Diagnostics
Business Unit focuses on the emerging opportunity in molecular
diagnostics. During all periods presented, the Company had
limited activity related to the Diagnostics Business Unit.
Accordingly, the Companys operating results for both units
were reported on an aggregate basis as one reportable segment
during these periods. The Company will begin reporting in two
segments once revenues, operating profit or loss, or assets of
the Diagnostics Business Unit exceed 10% of the consolidated
amounts.
The Company had revenue in the following regions for the years
ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
498,981
|
|
|
$
|
347,195
|
|
|
$
|
280,064
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
60,521
|
|
|
|
55,854
|
|
|
|
67,973
|
|
Other European countries
|
|
|
163,062
|
|
|
|
140,931
|
|
|
|
127,397
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
143,441
|
|
|
|
96,396
|
|
|
|
72,740
|
|
Other markets
|
|
|
36,736
|
|
|
|
25,948
|
|
|
|
25,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
902,741
|
|
|
$
|
666,324
|
|
|
$
|
573,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues are attributable to geographic areas based on the
region of destination.
The majority of our product sales consist of consumables and
instruments. For the years ended January 2, 2011,
January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008, consumable
sales represented 56%, 59%, and 58%, respectively, of total
revenues and instrument sales comprised 36%, 34%, and 32%,
respectively, of total revenues. The Companys customers
include leading genomic research centers, academic institutions,
government laboratories, and clinical research organizations, as
well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
81
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
agrigenomics, and consumer genomics companies. The Company had
no customers that provided more than 10% of total revenue in the
years ended January 2, 2011, January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008.
Net long-lived assets exclude goodwill and other intangible
assets since they are not allocated on a geographic basis. The
Company had net long-lived assets consisting of property and
equipment in the following regions as of January 2, 2011
and January 3, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
75,206
|
|
|
$
|
75,095
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
26,578
|
|
|
|
27,862
|
|
Other European countries
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
14,739
|
|
|
|
12,599
|
|
Other Asia-Pacific countries
|
|
|
11,642
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
129,874
|
|
|
$
|
117,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (unaudited)
|
The following financial information reflects all normal
recurring adjustments, except as noted below, which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the
results and cash flows of interim periods. All quarters for
fiscal years 2010 and 2009 ended January 2, 2011 and
January 3, 2010, respectively were 13 weeks except for
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, which was 14 weeks.
Summarized quarterly data for fiscal years 2010 and 2009 are as
follows (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
192,131
|
|
|
$
|
212,003
|
|
|
$
|
237,309
|
|
|
$
|
261,298
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
132,178
|
|
|
|
146,091
|
|
|
|
157,145
|
|
|
|
166,126
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
21,208
|
|
|
|
29,796
|
|
|
|
35,447
|
|
|
|
38,440
|
|
Net income per share, basic
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Net income per share, diluted
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
165,757
|
|
|
$
|
161,643
|
|
|
$
|
158,360
|
|
|
$
|
180,564
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
110,065
|
|
|
|
111,158
|
|
|
|
107,126
|
|
|
|
125,526
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,811
|
|
|
|
24,688
|
|
|
|
17,077
|
|
|
|
11,705
|
|
Net income per share, basic
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Net income per share, diluted
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
On January 10, 2011, the Company acquired Epicentre
Biotechnologies, Inc., a provider of nucleic acid sample
preparation reagents and specialty enzymes used in sequencing
and microarray applications. Total consideration exchanged for
the acquisition includes $60 million in cash,
$15 million in stock that is subject to forfeiture if
certain non-revenue based milestones are not met, and up to
$15 million in contingent consideration payments based on
the achievement of certain revenue-based milestones by
January 10, 2013. Due to the limited time since the
acquisition date, the Company has not completed the initial
purchase accounting for this acquisition, including the
assessment of fair values of consideration exchanged, assets
acquired, and liabilities assumed.
82
ILLUMINA,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the period from January 3, 2011 to February 28,
2011, certain noteholders notified the Company of their election
to convert an aggregate of $251.1 million principal amount
of our convertible senior notes in exchange for the repayment of
the principal amount and a certain number of shares of the
Companys common stock representing the in the
money amount of the notes. The number of shares of common
stock to be delivered upon conversion is based on the
Companys volume weighted average price over a
twenty-day
observation period that begins following the date of the
election to convert. In connection with the conversions, the
Company expects to exercise its right under the convertible note
hedge with its hedging counterparties to repurchase the same
amount of shares as exchanged in the conversions. The majority
of the notified conversions have not been executed as the
twenty-day
observation period has not concluded as of February 28,
2011.
Upon conversion, the Company will record a gain or loss for the
difference between the fair value of the notes to be
extinguished and its corresponding carrying value, net of
unamortized debt issuance costs. The fair value of the notes to
be extinguished depends on the Companys current
incremental borrowing rate. The net carrying value of the notes
has an implicit interest rate of 8.27%. As the interest rate
applicable at the time of conversion is likely to be lower than
the implied interest rate of the notes, the Company will likely
record a loss in its consolidated statement of income during the
first quarter of 2011.
83
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
We design our internal controls to provide reasonable assurance
that (1) our transactions are properly authorized;
(2) our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or
improper use; and (3) our transactions are properly
recorded and reported in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. We also maintain internal
controls and procedures to ensure that we comply with applicable
laws and our established financial policies.
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act), as of January 2, 2011. Based upon
that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that, as of January 2, 2011,
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that (a) the information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and
(b) such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure
controls and procedures, our management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management have concluded
that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the
reasonable assurance level. Because of inherent limitations in
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a
company have been detected.
An evaluation was also performed under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, of any change in
our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fourth quarter of 2010 and that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation did
not identify any such change.
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f).
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of January 2, 2011. The
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of January 2, 2011 has been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, an independent registered accounting firm, as stated
in their report which is included herein.
84
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Illumina, Inc.
We have audited Illumina, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of January 2, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Illumina,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Illumina, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of January 2, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Illumina, Inc. as of
January 2, 2011 and January 3, 2010, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 2, 2011 of Illumina, Inc. and our report dated
February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
San Diego, California
February 28, 2011
85
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
|
(a) Identification of Directors. Information concerning our
directors is incorporated by reference from the section entitled
Proposal One: Election of Directors,
Information About Directors, Director
Compensation and Board of Directors and Corporate
Governance to be contained in our definitive Proxy
Statement with respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 9, 2011.
(b) Identification of Executive Officers. Information
concerning our executive officers is incorporated by reference
from the section entitled Executive Officers to be
contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no
later than April 9, 2011.
(c) Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated by reference
from the section entitled Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance to be contained in our
definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 9, 2011.
(d) Information concerning the audit committee financial
expert as defined by the SEC rules adopted pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is incorporated by reference from the
section entitled Board of Directors and Corporate
Governance to be contained in our definitive Proxy
Statement with respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 9, 2010.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics for our directors, officers and
employees, which is available on our website at www.illumina.com
in the Corporate Governance portal of the Investor Relations
section under Company. A copy of the Code of Ethics
is available in print free of charge to any stockholder who
requests a copy. Interested parties may address a written
request for a printed copy of the Code of Ethics to: Corporate
Secretary, Illumina, Inc., 9885 Towne Centre Dr.,
San Diego, California 92121. We intend to satisfy the
disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver
from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions, by posting such information on our website. The
information on, or that can be accessed from, our website is not
incorporated by reference into this report.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated by
reference from the sections entitled Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, Director Compensation
and Executive Compensation to be contained in our
definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 9, 2011.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
Information concerning the security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and management and information covering
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled
Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders and
Management, Executive Compensation and
Equity Compensation Plan Information to be contained
in our definitive
86
Proxy Statement with respect to our 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than
April 9, 2011.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
Information concerning certain relationships and related
transactions, and director independence is incorporated by
reference from the sections entitled Proposal One:
Election of Directors, Information About
Directors, Director Compensation,
Executive Compensation and Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions to be
contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no
later than April 9, 2011.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is
incorporated by reference from the sections entitled
Proposal Two: Ratification of Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accountants and
Independent Registered Public Accountants to be
contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no
later than April 9, 2011.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
1. Financial Statements: See Index
to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedule: See
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts and Reserves in this section of this
Form 10-K.
3. Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the
accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by
reference as part of this
Form 10-K.
87
Schedule
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND
RESERVES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Additions Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
to Expense/
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
Deductions(2)
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Year ended January 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
Reserve for inventory
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
|
|
(7,883
|
)
|
|
|
12,273
|
|
Year ended January 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,398
|
|
Reserve for inventory
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
Year ended December 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
Reserve for inventory
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for
inventory are charged to selling, general and administrative
expense and cost of product revenue respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Deductions for allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for
inventory are for accounts receivable written off and disposal
of obsolete inventory. |
88
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
09/23/08
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
04/27/10
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation for Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (included as Exhibit A to
exhibit 4.3)
|
|
8-A
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
05/14/01
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-33922
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
07/03/00
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2001, between Illumina
and Equiserve Trust Company, N.A.
|
|
8-A
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
05/14/01
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture related to the 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes
due 2014, dated as of February 16, 2007, between Illumina
and The Bank of New York, as trustee
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Illumina and each of
its directors and officers
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-33922
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
07/03/00
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.2
|
|
1998 Incentive Stock Plan
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-33922
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
07/03/00
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.3
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated
through October 28, 2009
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
02/26/10
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.4
|
|
2000 Stock Plan, as amended and restated through March 21,
2002
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
05/13/02
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.5
|
|
2005 Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated through
October 28, 2009
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
02/26/10
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.7
|
|
New Hire Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
through October 28, 2009
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
02/26/10
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
License Agreement, effective as of May 6, 1998, between
Tufts University and Illumina
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
05/03/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.9
|
|
The Solexa Unapproved Company Share Option Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
11/26/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.10
|
|
The Solexa Share Option Plan for Consultants
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
11/26/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.11
|
|
Solexa Limited Enterprise Management Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
11/26/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Solexa 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Solexa 1992 Stock Option Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
License Agreement, dated June 24, 2002, between Dade
Behring Marburg GmbH and Illumina (with certain confidential
portions omitted)
|
|
S-3/A
|
|
333-111496
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
03/02/04
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Non-exclusive License Agreement, dated January 24, 2002,
between Amersham Biosciences Corp. and Illumina (with certain
confidential portions omitted)
|
|
S-3/A
|
|
333-111496
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
03/02/04
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amended and Restated Lease between BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive
LLC and Illumina for the 9885 Towne Centre Drive property, dated
January 26, 2007
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
05/03/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Settlement and Cross License Agreement dated August 18,
2004 between Applera Corporation and Illumina (with certain
confidential portions omitted)
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
11/12/04
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Collaboration Agreement, dated December 17, 2004, between
Invitrogen Corporation and Illumina (with certain confidential
portions omitted)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
03/08/05
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.19
|
|
Offer letter for Christian O. Henry dated April 26, 2005
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
08/08/05
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Joint Development and Licensing Agreement, dated May 15,
2006, between deCODE genetics, ehf. and Illumina (with certain
confidential portions omitted)
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
08/02/06
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.21
|
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement
between Illumina and Jay T Flatley, dated October 22,
2008
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance
Agreement between Illumina and its executive officers
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under Illuminas 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
02/26/09
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Lease between BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC and Illumina for
the 9865 Towne Centre Drive property, dated January 26, 2007
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
05/03/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Settlement and Release Agreement between Affymetrix, Inc. and
Illumina, dated January 9, 2008
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
02/26/08
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction, dated
February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Goldman,
Sachs & Co.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedge Transaction, dated
February 12, 2007, by and between Illumina and Deutsche
Bank AG London
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Confirmation Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 12,
2007, by and between Illumina and Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Confirmation Issuer Warrant Transaction, dated February 12,
2007, by and between Illumina and Deutsche Bank AG London
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment to the Confirmation of Issuer Warrant Transaction,
dated February 13, 2007, by and between Illumina and
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Amendment to the Confirmation of Issuer Warrant Transaction,
dated February 13, 2007, by and between Illumina and
Deutsche Bank AG London
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
02/16/07
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.32
|
|
Indemnification Agreement between Illumina and Gregory F. Heath
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
07/25/08
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.33
|
|
Indemnification Agreement between Illumina and Joel McComb
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
07/25/08
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.34
|
|
Severance and Release Agreement between Illumina and Joel McComb
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-30361
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
02/26/10
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between ARE-SD
Region No. 32, LLC and Illumina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Illumina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Christian O. Henry pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Jay T. Flatley pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Christian O. Henry pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
X
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Management contract or corporate plan or arrangement |
Supplemental
Information
No Annual Report to stockholders or proxy materials has been
sent to stockholders as of the date of this report. The Annual
Report to stockholders and proxy material will be furnished to
our stockholders subsequent to the filing of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and we will furnish such material to the SEC at that time.
91
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 28,
2011.
Illumina, Inc.
Jay T. Flatley
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2011
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jay T. Flatley
and Christian O. Henry, and each or any one of them, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jay
T. Flatley
Jay
T. Flatley
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christian
O. Henry
Christian
O. Henry
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. Rastetter
William
H. Rastetter
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ A.
Blaine Bowman
A.
Blaine Bowman
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
M. Bradbury
Daniel
M. Bradbury
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Karin
Eastham
Karin
Eastham
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul
Grint
Paul
Grint
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald
Möller
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
R. Walt
David
R. Walt
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Roy
Whitfield
Roy
Whitfield
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2011
|
93