þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
Ohio | 31-0746871 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) |
6200 S. Gilmore Road, Fairfield, Ohio | 45014-5141 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Page | ||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1 | Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income |
4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity |
5 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
6 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
7 | |||||
Item 2 | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
15 | ||||
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
39 | ||||
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures |
46 | ||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1 | Legal Proceedings |
46 | ||||
Item 1A | Risk Factors |
46 | ||||
Item 2 | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
46 | ||||
Item 3 | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
47 | ||||
Item 4 | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
47 | ||||
Item 5 | Other Information |
47 | ||||
Item 6 | Exhibits |
47 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
2 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments |
||||||||
Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2008$5,943; 2007$5,783) (includes securities pledged to creditors: 2008$0; 2007$745) |
$ | 5,729 | $ | 5,848 | ||||
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2008$2,400; 2007$2,975) |
4,137 | 6,249 | ||||||
Short-term investments, at fair value (amortized cost: 2008$212; 2007$101) |
212 | 101 | ||||||
Other invested assets |
82 | 63 | ||||||
Total investments |
10,160 | 12,261 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
347 | 226 | ||||||
Securities lending collateral invested |
0 | 760 | ||||||
Investment income receivable |
96 | 124 | ||||||
Finance receivable |
74 | 92 | ||||||
Premiums receivable |
1,103 | 1,107 | ||||||
Reinsurance receivable |
846 | 754 | ||||||
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
13 | 13 | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
501 | 461 | ||||||
Land, building and equipment, net, for company use (accumulated depreciation: 2008$290; 2007$276) |
235 | 239 | ||||||
Other assets |
381 | 72 | ||||||
Separate accounts |
547 | 528 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 14,303 | $ | 16,637 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Insurance reserves |
||||||||
Loss and loss expense reserves |
$ | 4,166 | $ | 3,967 | ||||
Life policy reserves |
1,553 | 1,478 | ||||||
Unearned premiums |
1,583 | 1,564 | ||||||
Securities lending payable |
0 | 760 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
671 | 574 | ||||||
Deferred income tax |
236 | 977 | ||||||
Note payable |
69 | 69 | ||||||
6.125% senior notes due 2034 |
371 | 371 | ||||||
6.9% senior debentures due 2028 |
28 | 28 | ||||||
6.92% senior debentures due 2028 |
392 | 392 | ||||||
Separate accounts |
547 | 528 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
9,616 | 10,708 | ||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 6) |
| | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock, par value$2 per share; (authorized: 2008500 million shares,
2007500 million shares; issued: 2008196 million shares, 2007196 million shares) |
393 | 393 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
1,063 | 1,049 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
3,482 | 3,404 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
956 | 2,151 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost (200834 million shares, 200730 million shares) |
(1,207 | ) | (1,068 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
4,687 | 5,929 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 14,303 | $ | 16,637 | ||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 3 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions except per share data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
||||||||||||||||
Property casualty |
$ | 751 | $ | 777 | $ | 2,262 | $ | 2,348 | ||||||||
Life |
30 | 34 | 93 | 99 | ||||||||||||
Investment income, net of expenses |
130 | 152 | 412 | 451 | ||||||||||||
Realized investment gains and losses |
272 | 16 | 28 | 370 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
3 | 3 | 11 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,186 | 982 | 2,806 | 3,283 | ||||||||||||
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Insurance losses and policyholder benefits |
563 | 559 | 1,693 | 1,533 | ||||||||||||
Commissions |
130 | 136 | 428 | 466 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
108 | 90 | 292 | 266 | ||||||||||||
Taxes, licenses and fees |
16 | 18 | 52 | 57 | ||||||||||||
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs |
(1 | ) | 6 | (18 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense |
14 | 13 | 39 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
830 | 822 | 2,486 | 2,344 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
356 | 160 | 320 | 939 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION (benefit) FOR INCOME TAXES |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
140 | 32 | 146 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Deferred |
(31 | ) | 4 | (94 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||
Total provision for income taxes |
109 | 36 | 52 | 270 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 247 | $ | 124 | $ | 268 | $ | 669 | ||||||||
PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Net incomebasic |
$ | 1.51 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 1.64 | $ | 3.89 | ||||||||
Net incomediluted |
1.50 | 0.72 | 1.64 | 3.86 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
4 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
COMMON STOCK |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
$ | 393 | $ | 391 | ||||
Stock options exercised |
0 | 1 | ||||||
End of period |
393 | 392 | ||||||
PAID-IN CAPITAL |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
1,049 | 1,015 | ||||||
Stock options exercised |
4 | 13 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
9 | 11 | ||||||
Other |
1 | 2 | ||||||
End of period |
1,063 | 1,041 | ||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
3,404 | 2,786 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for hybrid financial securities |
0 | 5 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for uncertain tax positions |
0 | (1 | ) | |||||
Adjusted beginning of year |
3,404 | 2,790 | ||||||
Net income |
268 | 669 | ||||||
Dividends declared |
(190 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||
End of period |
3,482 | 3,277 | ||||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
2,151 | 3,379 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for hybrid financial securities |
0 | (5 | ) | |||||
Adjusted beginning of year |
2,151 | 3,374 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net |
(1,195 | ) | (639 | ) | ||||
End of period |
956 | 2,735 | ||||||
TREASURY STOCK |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
(1,068 | ) | (763 | ) | ||||
Purchases |
(139 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
End of period |
(1,207 | ) | (907 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
$ | 4,687 | $ | 6,538 | ||||
COMMON STOCK NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
166 | 173 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury shares |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
End of period |
162 | 170 | ||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 268 | $ | 669 | ||||
Unrealized investment gains and losses during the period |
(1,842 | ) | (989 | ) | ||||
Other |
0 | 4 | ||||||
Taxes on other comprehensive income |
647 | 346 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (927 | ) | $ | 30 | |||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 5 |
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 268 | $ | 669 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items |
27 | 26 | ||||||
Realized gains on investments |
(28 | ) | (370 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation |
9 | 11 | ||||||
Interest credited to contract holders |
28 | 25 | ||||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Investment income receivable |
28 | (2 | ) | |||||
Premiums and reinsurance receivable |
(88 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
(18 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
4 | (6 | ) | |||||
Loss and loss expense reserves |
199 | 135 | ||||||
Life policy reserves |
71 | 71 | ||||||
Unearned premiums |
19 | 40 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(30 | ) | 28 | |||||
Deferred income tax |
(94 | ) | 5 | |||||
Current income tax |
87 | (1 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
482 | 520 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Sale of fixed maturities |
119 | 267 | ||||||
Call or maturity of fixed maturities |
933 | 330 | ||||||
Sale of equity securities |
1,036 | 602 | ||||||
Collection of finance receivables |
29 | 28 | ||||||
Purchase of fixed maturities |
(1,346 | ) | (792 | ) | ||||
Purchase of equity securities |
(591 | ) | (626 | ) | ||||
Change in short-term investments, net |
(110 | ) | 60 | |||||
Investment in buildings and equipment, net |
(28 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Investment in finance receivables |
(12 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Change in other invested assets, net |
(14 | ) | 1 | |||||
Change in securities lending collateral invested |
741 | (768 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
757 | (967 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Payment of cash dividends to shareholders |
(186 | ) | (180 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury shares |
(139 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
Increase in notes payable |
0 | 20 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
4 | 14 | ||||||
Contract holder funds deposited |
13 | 12 | ||||||
Contract holder funds withdrawn |
(46 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
Change in securities lending payable |
(760 | ) | 768 | |||||
Other |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(1,118 | ) | 428 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
121 | (19 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
226 | 202 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 347 | $ | 183 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest: 2008$3; 2007$2) |
$ | 26 | $ | 26 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
58 | 264 | ||||||
Non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Conversion of securities |
$ | 3 | $ | 108 | ||||
Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations |
0 | 7 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
6 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 7 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Change in unrealized investment gains and losses and other summary: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
$ | (147 | ) | $ | 60 | $ | (280 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | |||||
Equity securities |
(150 | ) | (488 | ) | (1,536 | ) | (959 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs and life policy reserves |
8 | (1 | ) | 13 | 1 | |||||||||||
Pension obligations |
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(30 | ) | 0 | (40 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||
Income taxes on above |
112 | 150 | 647 | 346 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (207 | ) | $ | (278 | ) | $ | (1,195 | ) | $ | (639 | ) | ||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
8 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Direct earned premiums |
$ | 799 | $ | 815 | $ | 2,389 | $ | 2,462 | ||||||||
Assumed earned premiums |
3 | 6 | 8 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Ceded earned premiums |
(51 | ) | (44 | ) | (135 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||||||
Net earned premiums |
$ | 751 | $ | 777 | $ | 2,262 | $ | 2,348 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Direct incurred loss and loss expenses |
$ | 598 | $ | 534 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 1,511 | ||||||||
Assumed incurred loss and loss expenses |
2 | 6 | 2 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Ceded incurred loss and loss expenses |
(78 | ) | (17 | ) | (138 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||
Net incurred loss and loss expenses |
$ | 522 | $ | 523 | $ | 1,579 | $ | 1,435 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Direct earned premiums |
$ | 43 | $ | 44 | $ | 131 | $ | 129 | ||||||||
Assumed earned premiums |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Ceded earned premiums |
(13 | ) | (10 | ) | (38 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||
Net earned premiums |
$ | 30 | $ | 34 | $ | 93 | $ | 99 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Direct contract holders benefits incurred |
$ | 54 | $ | 46 | $ | 148 | $ | 128 | ||||||||
Assumed contract holders benefits incurred |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Ceded contract holders benefits incurred |
(13 | ) | (10 | ) | (34 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||
Net contract holders benefits incurred |
$ | 41 | $ | 36 | $ | 114 | $ | 98 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 6 | $ | 12 | $ | 15 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
4 | 4 | 13 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain), prior
service cost and transition asset |
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Curtailment |
3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 17 | $ | 18 | ||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 9 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation cost |
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | 9 | $ | 11 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation cost after tax |
$ | 2 | $ | 3 | $ | 6 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Weighted average expected term |
7-8 years | 5-7 years | ||||||
Expected volatility |
20.58- 24.67% | 18.29 - 24.14% | ||||||
Dividend yield |
3.99-6.22% | 3.33% | ||||||
Risk-free rates |
3.29-3.84% | 4.8-4.81% | ||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
10 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Weighted- | ||||||||||||
average | Aggregate | |||||||||||
exercise | intrinsic | |||||||||||
(Shares in thousands) | Shares | price | value | |||||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
10,480 | $ | 36.86 | |||||||||
Granted |
775 | 38.64 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(119 | ) | 31.40 | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(1,069 | ) | 36.59 | |||||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
10,067 | 37.09 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Options exercisable at end of period |
8,521 | 36.22 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period |
7.41 |
(Shares in thousands) | Options outstanding | Options exercisable | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||
remaining | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise prices | Shares | contractual life | exercise price | Shares | exercise price | |||||||||||||||
$25.00 to $29.99 |
824 | 1.41 yrs | $ | 26.95 | 816 | $ | 26.97 | |||||||||||||
$30.00 to $34.99 |
3,787 | 2.78 yrs | 32.92 | 3,787 | 32.92 | |||||||||||||||
$35.00 to $39.99 |
2,254 | 6.16 yrs | 38.53 | 1,503 | 38.40 | |||||||||||||||
$40.00 to $44.99 |
1,924 | 6.83 yrs | 42.55 | 1,555 | 42.01 | |||||||||||||||
$45.00 to $49.99 |
1,278 | 7.26 yrs | 45.26 | 860 | 45.26 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
10,067 | 4.77 yrs | 37.09 | 8,521 | 36.22 | |||||||||||||||
Service - | Weighted - | Performance - | Weighted - | |||||||||||||
based | average grant- | based | average grant- | |||||||||||||
nonvested | date fair | nonvested | date fair | |||||||||||||
(Shares in thousands) | shares | value | shares | value | ||||||||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2008 |
162 | $ | 40.74 | 35 | $ | 40.74 | ||||||||||
Granted |
227 | 34.70 | 47 | 32.61 | ||||||||||||
Vested |
(2 | ) | 37.65 | (1 | ) | 36.47 | ||||||||||
Forfeited |
(7 | ) | 37.61 | 0 | 0.00 | |||||||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2008 |
380 | 37.20 | 81 | 36.04 | ||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 11 |
| Level 1 Financial assets and liabilities for which inputs are observable and are obtained from reliable quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in actively traded markets. This is the most reliable fair value measurement and includes, for example, active exchange-traded equity securities. |
| Level 2 Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which values are based on similar assets and liabilities that are actively traded. Also includes pricing models for which the inputs are corroborated by market data. |
| Level 3 Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3 inputs include the following: |
o | Quotes from brokers or other external sources that are not considered binding; | ||
o | Quotes from brokers or other external sources where it cannot be determined that market participants would in fact transact for the asset or liability at the quoted price; | ||
o | Quotes from brokers or other external sources where the inputs are not deemed observable. |
Asset fair value measurements at reporting date using | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
active markets for | observable | unobservable | ||||||||||||||
identical assets | inputs | inputs | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable fixed maturities |
$ | 426 | $ | 2,672 | $ | 49 | $ | 3,147 | ||||||||
Taxable fixed maturities separate accounts |
56 | 419 | 2 | 477 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt fixed maturities |
0 | 2,533 | 5 | 2,538 | ||||||||||||
Common equities |
3,874 | 0 | 63 | 3,937 | ||||||||||||
Preferred equities |
0 | 162 | 38 | 200 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
0 | 212 | 0 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Top Hat Savings Plan |
5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,361 | $ | 6,043 | $ | 157 | $ | 10,561 | ||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
12 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Asset fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | maturities- | Tax-exempt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed | separate | fixed | Common | Preferred | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | maturities | accounts | maturities | equities | equities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 57 | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 63 | $ | 47 | $ | 175 | ||||||||||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | 0 | (10 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(1 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
(4 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, September 30, 2008 |
$ | 49 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | $ | 63 | $ | 38 | $ | 157 | ||||||||||||
Asset fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | maturities- | Tax-exempt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed | separate | fixed | Common | Preferred | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | maturities | accounts | maturities | equities | equities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2008 |
$ | 85 | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 59 | $ | 58 | $ | 210 | ||||||||||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | 0 | (16 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(5 | ) | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
(15 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
(13 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (10 | ) | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ending balance, September 30, 2008 |
$ | 49 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | $ | 63 | $ | 38 | $ | 157 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial lines property casualty insurance |
| Personal lines property casualty insurance |
| Life insurance |
| Investment operations |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 13 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial lines insurance |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial casualty |
$ | 197 | $ | 205 | $ | 580 | $ | 623 | ||||||||
Commercial property |
120 | 125 | 364 | 373 | ||||||||||||
Commercial auto |
103 | 108 | 308 | 331 | ||||||||||||
Workers compensation |
93 | 94 | 282 | 280 | ||||||||||||
Specialty packages |
35 | 36 | 107 | 109 | ||||||||||||
Surety and executive risk |
27 | 25 | 80 | 73 | ||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
7 | 7 | 22 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial lines insurance |
582 | 600 | 1,743 | 1,810 | ||||||||||||
Personal lines insurance |
||||||||||||||||
Personal auto |
81 | 85 | 245 | 259 | ||||||||||||
Homeowner |
64 | 70 | 208 | 214 | ||||||||||||
Other personal lines |
22 | 22 | 65 | 65 | ||||||||||||
Total personal lines insurance |
167 | 177 | 518 | 538 | ||||||||||||
Life insurance |
30 | 35 | 94 | 103 | ||||||||||||
Investment operations |
402 | 168 | 440 | 821 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5 | 2 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,186 | $ | 982 | $ | 2,806 | $ | 3,283 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Insurance underwriting results: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial lines insurance |
$ | 30 | $ | 28 | $ | 59 | $ | 184 | ||||||||
Personal lines insurance |
(38 | ) | (7 | ) | (82 | ) | 8 | |||||||||
Life insurance |
(6 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | 4 | |||||||||
Investment operations |
386 | 154 | 393 | 778 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(16 | ) | (13 | ) | (44 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 356 | $ | 160 | $ | 320 | $ | 939 | ||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Property casualty insurance |
$ | 2,385 | $ | 2,281 | ||||
Life insurance |
1,024 | 938 | ||||||
Investment operations |
10,506 | 12,322 | ||||||
Other |
388 | 1,096 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 14,303 | $ | 16,637 | ||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
14 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
| Unusually high levels of catastrophe losses due to risk concentrations, changes in weather patterns, environmental events, terrorism incidents or other causes |
| Events or conditions that could weaken or harm the companys relationships with its independent agencies and hamper opportunities to add new agencies, resulting in limitations on the companys opportunities for growth, such as: |
o | Multi-notch downgrades of the companys financial strength ratings | ||
o | Concerns that doing business with the company is too difficult or | ||
o | Perceptions that the companys level of service, particularly claims service, is no longer a distinguishing characteristic in the marketplace |
| Further decline in overall stock market values negatively affecting the companys equity portfolio and book value; in particular further declines in the market value of financial sector stocks |
| Securities laws that could limit the manner, timing and volume of our investment transactions |
| Events, such as the credit crisis triggered by subprime mortgage lending practices, that lead to: |
o | Significant decline in the value of a particular security or group of securities, such as our financial sector holdings, and impairment of the asset(s) | ||
o | Significant decline in investment income due to reduced or eliminated dividend payouts from a particular security or group of securities | ||
o | Significant rise in losses from surety and director and officer policies written for financial institutions |
| Recession or other economic conditions or regulatory, accounting or tax changes resulting in lower demand for insurance products |
| Prolonged low interest rate environment or other factors that limit the companys ability to generate growth in investment income or interest rate fluctuations that result in declining values of fixed-maturity investments |
| Inaccurate estimates or assumptions used for critical accounting estimates |
| Events or actions, including unauthorized intentional circumvention of controls, that reduce the companys future ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| Changing consumer buying habits and consolidation of independent insurance agencies that could alter our competitive advantages |
| Increased frequency and/or severity of claims |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 15 |
| Delays or inadequacies in the development, implementation, performance and benefits of technology projects and enhancements |
| Ability to obtain adequate reinsurance on acceptable terms, amount of reinsurance purchased, financial strength of reinsurers and the potential for non-payment or delay in payment by reinsurers |
| Increased competition that could result in a significant reduction in the companys premium growth rate |
| Underwriting and pricing methods adopted by competitors that could allow them to identify and flexibly price risks, which could decrease our competitive advantages |
| Personal lines pricing and loss trends that lead management to conclude that this segment could not attain sustainable profitability, which could prevent the capitalization of policy acquisition costs |
| Actions of insurance departments, state attorneys general or other regulatory agencies that: |
o | Restrict our ability to exit or reduce writings of unprofitable coverages or lines of business | ||
o | Place the insurance industry under greater regulatory scrutiny or result in new statutes, rules and regulations | ||
o | Increase our expenses | ||
o | Add assessments for guaranty funds, other insurance related assessments or mandatory reinsurance arrangements; or that impair our ability to recover such assessments through future surcharges or other rate changes | ||
o | Limit our ability to set fair, adequate and reasonable rates | ||
o | Place us at a disadvantage in the marketplace | ||
o | Restrict our ability to execute our business model, including the way we compensate agents |
| Adverse outcomes from litigation or administrative proceedings |
| Unforeseen departure of certain executive officers or other key employees due to retirement, health or other causes that could interrupt progress toward important strategic goals or diminish the effectiveness of certain longstanding relationships with insurance agents and others |
| Events, such as an epidemic, natural catastrophe, terrorism or construction delays, that could hamper our ability to assemble our workforce at our headquarters location |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions except share data) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Income statement data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 781 | $ | 811 | (3.7 | ) | $ | 2,355 | $ | 2,447 | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investment income, net of expenses |
130 | 152 | (14.5 | ) | 412 | 451 | (8.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Realized investment gains and losses (pretax) |
272 | 16 | nm | 28 | 370 | (92.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,186 | 982 | 20.8 | 2,806 | 3,283 | (14.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
247 | 124 | 99.5 | 268 | 669 | (59.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Per share data (diluted) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1.50 | 0.72 | 108.3 | 1.64 | 3.86 | (57.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
0.39 | 0.355 | 9.9 | 1.17 | 1.065 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
164,242,185 | 172,399,539 | (4.7 | ) | 163,834,163 | 173,423,199 | (5.5 | ) |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
16 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
At September 30, | At December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in millions except share data) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Balance sheet data |
||||||||
Invested assets |
$ | 10,160 | $ | 12,261 | ||||
Total assets |
14,303 | 16,637 | ||||||
Short-term debt |
69 | 69 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
791 | 791 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
4,687 | 5,929 | ||||||
Book value per share |
28.87 | 35.70 | ||||||
Debt-to-capital ratio |
15.5 | % | 12.7 | % |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Performance measures |
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 41 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | (927 | ) | $ | 30 | ||||||
Return on equity, annualized |
21.0 | % | 7.4 | % | 6.7 | % | 13.4 | % | ||||||||
Return on equity,
annualized, based on
comprehensive income (loss) |
3.5 | (8.9 | ) | (23.3 | ) | 0.6 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated property casualty highlights |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 727 | $ | 736 | (1.3 | ) | $ | 2,292 | $ | 2,392 | (4.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
751 | 777 | (3.3 | ) | 2,262 | 2,348 | (3.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting profit |
(9 | ) | 21 | (144.8 | ) | (26 | ) | 192 | (113.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
GAAP combined ratio |
101.3 | % | 97.3 | % | 101.1 | % | 91.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Statutory combined ratio |
102.8 | 98.7 | 100.5 | 91.3 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 17 |
(In millions, net of reinsurance) | Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Personal | Commercial | Personal | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates | Cause of loss | Region | lines | lines | Total | lines | lines | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jan. 4-9 |
Wind, hail, flood, freezing | South, Midwest | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | |||||||||||||
Jan. 29-30 |
Wind, hail | Midwest | (1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 5 | 4 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Feb. 5-6 |
Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | 0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 6 | 7 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 14 |
Tornadoes, wind, hail, flood | South | (1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 15-16 |
Wind, hail | South | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Apr. 9-11 |
Wind, hail, flood | South | (3 | ) | 0 | (3 | ) | 16 | 2 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
May 1 |
Wind, hail | South | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
May 10-12 |
Wind, hail, flood | South, Mid-Atlantic | (1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
May 22-26 |
Wind, hail | Midwest | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
May 29- Jun 1 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jun. 2-4 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 0 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jun. 5-8 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | 9 | 7 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
Jun. 11-12 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 0 | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | 11 | 6 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jun. 25 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jul. 19 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jul. 26 |
Wind, hail, flood, water, hydrostatic | Midwest | 1 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sep. 12-14 |
Hurricane Ike | South, Midwest | 20 | 37 | 57 | 20 | 37 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||||
All other |
1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Development on
2007 and prior
catastrophes |
1 | 2 | 3 | (2 | ) | 1 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Calendar year
incurred total |
$ | 23 | $ | 40 | $ | 63 | $ | 112 | $ | 107 | $ | 219 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 1-2 |
Wind, hail, flood | South | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 0 | $ | 5 | $ | 2 | $ | 7 | |||||||||||||
Jun. 7-9 |
Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sep. 20-21 |
Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | 1 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
4 | 2 | 6 | 18 | 8 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Development on
2006 and prior
catastrophes |
(5 | ) | 2 | (3 | ) | (11 | ) | (9 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Calendar year
incurred total |
$ | 1 | $ | 12 | $ | 13 | $ | 17 | $ | 11 | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
18 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
| Maintaining our strong relationships with our established independent agencies, writing a significant portion of each agencys business and attracting new agencies In 2008, we expect to continue to rank No. 1 or No. 2 by premium volume in approximately 75 percent of the agency locations that have marketed our standard market products for more than five years, not taking into account any contribution from our excess and surplus lines business. During 2008, we subdivided two of our operating territories to improve service to our agencies. We now also believe we will appoint a total of 75 new agencies throughout the markets we serve for the full-year. | |
We appointed 56 new agencies in the first nine months of the year, of which 39 were new relationships. As a result, at September 30, 2008, our 1,118 agency relationships had 1,369 reporting agency locations marketing our standard market insurance products. At year-end 2007, our 1,092 agency relationships had 1,327 reporting agency locations. | ||
In 2007, we appointed our first agencies in eastern Washington and New Mexico, our 33rd and 34th states of operation. In July 2008, we announced our plans to launch commercial lines operations in selected Texas markets, which will become our 35th state of operation. Since the end of the third quarter, the first member of our local team has begun meeting with agencies in the Austin market. Our second team member is scheduled to relocate to the Dallas market in November. We expect to appoint our first agency in the state and receive approval for regulatory filings in December. New field territories and agency appointments in Texas were not counted in our targets for 2008. We have not announced plans to enter any additional states but continue to study other potential markets for future expansion. | ||
In 2008, we are making further progress in our efforts to improve service to and communication with our agencies through our expanding software capabilities. We discuss our technology plans for 2008 in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1, Technology Solutions, Page 4. | ||
Key technology accomplishments of 2008 included: |
o | Introduced WinCPP, our commercial lines policy rating system, in our newest states Washington and New Mexico. | ||
o | Made a direct bill option available for e-CLAS, our commercial lines policy processing system, which currently processes Businessowners Policies and Dentists Package Policies in 30 states. We continue to work to make direct bill an option for all commercial policies as soon as practical. | ||
o | Deployed Diamond, our personal lines policy processing system, to agencies in seven additional states. One additional state is scheduled for the remainder of 2008 and three are scheduled for early 2009. Following those deployments, Diamond will be available in 28 states. | ||
o | Gave agencies online access to selected policyholder claims information. | ||
o | Added excess and surplus lines policy administration system that delivers policies to agencies within 24 hours. |
Over the years, we have been able to increase our share of our agencies business by making available insurance products that meet the needs of the individuals and businesses in their communities. In recent years, our agents had indicated their interest in having Cincinnati available as a market for commercial accounts that require the flexibility of excess and surplus lines coverage. | ||
Our 2008 objective was to introduce our excess and surplus lines products and services to agencies in all of our active states except Delaware, Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Companys state of incorporation. During the first nine months of the year, our new excess and surplus lines company has begun marketing general liability coverages in 23 of those states and remains on track to have these coverages available in 33 states by year-end. In addition, we have introduced the property coverages in five states with an additional 22 states planned for November 2008. During the remainder of the year and into 2009, we intend to introduce additional lines of business, beginning with miscellaneous professional. The availability of our new excess and surplus lines coverages has enhanced our ability to write new standard market property casualty business as a means for rounding out accounts that require both admitted and non-admitted market solutions. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 19 |
| Achieving above-industry-average growth in property casualty statutory net written premiums and maintaining industry-leading profitability over the long-term by leveraging our regional franchise and proven agency-centered business strategy For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, total net written premiums, including commercial, personal and excess and surplus lines, declined 4.2 percent, primarily due to commercial lines market conditions. At this time, we continue to believe that 2008 full-year written premiums could decline by 5 percent, or slightly more, if pessimistic views of market and economic trends are accurate and pricing in our industry continues to be very competitive. | |
Nonetheless, we feel the rate of decline in premiums may hold at the nine-month level through year-end. This pace is appropriate and consistent with our agents practice of selecting and retaining accounts with manageable risk characteristics that support the lower prevailing prices. It reflects the advantages of our three year policies. We believe this pace also reflects the advantages we achieve through our field force, which provides us with quality intelligence on local market conditions. | ||
In early October 2008, A.M. Best revised its forecast for industry year-end property casualty underwriting results. A.M. Best adjusted its premium outlook modestly, indicating that overall industry premiums would decline by 0.7 percent in 2008 compared with its earlier projection of a decline of 0.6 percent. Net written premiums for the commercial lines sector now are expected to be down 3.0 percent compared with the previous estimate of a 2.3 percent decline. Personal lines net written premiums now are expected to rise 1.0 percent, down slightly from the previous estimate of 1.4 percent growth. | ||
A.M. Best also updated its industry combined ratio forecast and now estimates the industry average combined ratio for the full year could be 103.2 percent, up from its initial estimate of 98.6 percent. A.M. Best described price softening, tougher market conditions, high catastrophe losses in the years first half and larger underwriting losses from mortgage and financial guaranty insurers as driving the increase in the estimate. | ||
A.M. Bests combined ratio estimate for the commercial lines segment has increased to 104.0 percent for the full-year, above the previous estimate of 97.5 percent. Best indicated the change reflected large underwriting losses from mortgage and financial guaranty insurers, a business segment in which we do not compete. | ||
A.M. Bests combined ratio estimate for the personal lines segment has increased to 102.5 percent for the full year, above the previous estimate of 99.5 percent. Best indicated the revision is a result of unprecedented catastrophe activity in the first half of the year. | ||
In a difficult market, our agents have continued to bring the company quality business that has let us absorb high catastrophe losses at a near breakeven level through the first nine months of 2008, with the GAAP combined ratio at 101.1 percent. We believe the high storm activity might lead to a full-year 2008 combined ratio that also is modestly above 100 percent, compared with 90.3 percent in 2007. | ||
The anticipated year-over-year increase in the combined ratio reflects three assumptions: |
o | Catastrophe loss ratio We continue to believe catastrophe losses could contribute as much as 9 percentage points to the full-year 2008 combined ratio. The $219 million in catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, recorded for the first nine months of 2008 are already a full-year record for the company. | ||
We are aware of the unpredictability of catastrophic events in any given year. Catastrophe losses contributed an average of 3.7 percentage points to our full-year combined ratio in the past 10 years, ranging from 2007s low of 0.8 points to 1998s high of 6.1 points. | |||
o | Savings from favorable development on prior year reserves Through nine months, savings from favorable development on prior year reserves improved the combined ratio by 8.9 percentage points. Savings related to the commercial casualty line of business accounted for 67.3 percent of the total. Assuming no additional changes in the fourth quarter of 2008 on reserves for prior periods, savings from favorable development would contribute approximately 7 percent to the full-year 2008 combined ratio. | ||
The level of development on prior year reserves for full-year 2008 will be based on actual loss experience and on sound actuarial estimation techniques. As discussed in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Property Casualty Insurance Loss And Loss Expense Reserves, Page 37, our actuarial estimate of ultimate loss experience could prove better or worse than our carried reserves reflect. To the extent that reserves are inadequate and increased, the increase is a charge in the period that the deficiency is recognized, raising our loss and loss expense ratio and reducing earnings. To the extent that reserves are redundant and released, the release is a credit in the period that the redundancy is recognized, reducing our loss and loss expense ratio and increasing earnings. Historically, management has targeted loss and loss expense reserves in the upper half of the actuarially established range. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
20 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
o | Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophe losses and development on prior year reserves We believe the economic and market trends that contributed to an increase in this ratio in 2007 have continued. For the first nine months of 2008, this ratio rose 4.6 percentage points over the first nine months of 2007. Throughout 2008, we have continued to apply the reserving policies described in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Property Casualty Insurance Loss and Loss Expense Reserves, Page 37. | ||
Our current assumptions for the accident year loss ratio could be compromised by economic factors, including inflation, which could cause unanticipated changes in our claims and settlement expenses related to medical care, litigation and construction. We also could see higher than anticipated loss costs related to workers compensation and lines of business that provide protection against bodily injury claims. Similarly, higher legal expenses could raise the loss expenses we incur to defend our policyholders and settle complex or disputed claims. Moving forward, we would be able to factor any such higher losses and loss expenses into our pricing and reserve calculations, potentially increasing reserves and adjusting rates. |
In mid-2008, we modified our defined benefit pension plan and began the transition to a sponsored 401(k) with company matching of associate contributions. The pension plan now includes only associates who were 40 years of age or older on August 31, 2008, and who elected to remain in the plan. Fourth-quarter 2008 results will reflect a settlement cost of approximately $26 million largely related to benefits for the participants who left the qualified pension plan. | ||
Going forward, potential savings due to lower funding requirements for the pension plan are expected to be offset by company 401(k) contributions. Associates who are not accruing benefits under the pension plan are eligible to receive the company match of up to 6 percent of cash compensation. We chose to transition away from a defined benefit plan to reduce the companys future market risk while offering associates an up-to-date, more flexible benefits program. | ||
| Pursuing a total return investment strategy that generates both strong investment income growth and capital appreciation In September, we updated our previous guidance to indicate that full-year 2008 investment income could decline more than 10 percent from the level of 2007. The primary reasons we lowered our investment income estimate were Fifth Third Bancorps (NASDAQ:FITB) 66 percent reduction in its quarterly cash dividend in June 2008 and dividend reductions earlier in the year on securities we subsequently sold. We also lost dividend income on preferred shares of Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation beginning in September 2008. | |
We discuss these events in more detail in Investments Results of Operation, Page 33. Our revised outlook also considers other changes in the equity portfolio in the past 12 months, the anticipated level of dividend income from other equity holdings, the investment of insurance operations cash flow and the current portfolio attributes. Preliminarily, we do not anticipate a return to growth of investment income in 2009. | ||
We continue to focus on portfolio strategies to balance near-term income generation with the potential for long-term book value growth. Our board and investment department recently adopted internal guidelines to place additional parameters around our portfolio. These parameters address, among other issues, the overall mix of the portfolio as well as security and sector concentrations. The parameters came out of our risk management program, with the goal of more specifically defining our risk limits, aligning our operating plan accordingly and improving managements ability to identify and respond to changing conditions. In adopting the parameters, we have made changes to the portfolio, including partial sales of selected positions to lock in gains or reduce concentrations. As we reinvest the proceeds of these sales, we have made purchases in sectors that we believe have better prospects and provide better balance. We expect to continue to make changes to the portfolio, as appropriate. | ||
As a result, fixed-maturity investments now represent almost 60 percent of the portfolio, a level management believes is appropriate. We also diversified the equity portfolio, reducing our financial sector holdings by approximately 25 percent in the past three months. We view this diversifying action to be consistent with our view of prudent risk management. Going forward, we will evaluate all of our fixed-maturity and equity investments using our investment parameters and risk limits and adding to both the fixed maturity and equity portfolios, as appropriate. We believe our current capital position can withstand short-term pressures, such as the market volatility that we have experienced in October. | ||
We do not establish annual capital appreciation targets. Over the long term, our target is to have the equity portfolio outperform the Standard & Poors 500 Index. In the first nine months of 2008, our equity portfolio return was a negative 18.2 percent, compared with a negative return of 19.3 percent for the Index. Over the five years ended September 30, 2008, our compound annual equity portfolio return was a negative 4.2 percent compared with a compound annual total return of 5.2 percent for the Index. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 21 |
| Increasing the total return to shareholders through a combination of higher earnings per share, growth in book value, rising dividends and share repurchase We do not announce annual targets for earnings per share or book value. Over the long term, we look for our earnings per share and book value growth to outpace that of a peer group of national and regional property casualty insurance companies. | |
The board of directors is committed to steadily increasing cash dividends, periodically authorizing stock dividends and splits and authorizing share repurchase. In February 2008, the board increased the indicated annual cash dividend rate 9.9 percent, marking the 48th consecutive year of increase in the dividend rate. We believe our record of dividend increases is matched by only 11 other publicly traded corporations. Management believes the companys capital position and cash flow support the current cash dividend payout and would provide the board with the flexibility to consider future increases for shareholders. | ||
Over the long-term, we seek to increase earnings per share, book value and dividends at a rate that would allow long-term total return to our shareholders to exceed that of the Standard & Poors Composite 1500 Property Casualty Insurance Index. Over the five years ended December 31, 2007, our total return to shareholders of 34.0 percent was below the 62.3 percent return for that Index. For the first nine months of 2008, that Index group had a negative total return to shareholders of 12.9 percent, largely reflecting overall insurance market conditions and concerns related to the ongoing credit crisis. We underperformed the Index for the same period, returning a negative 25.2 percent. | ||
| Maintaining financial strength by keeping the ratio of debt to capital below 15 percent and purchasing reinsurance to provide investment flexibility Market fluctuations during 2008 led to lower shareholders equity and reduced capital at September 30, 2008. As a result, our debt-to-capital ratio of 15.5 percent as of September 30, 2008, remained slightly above our target level. We continue to minimize our reliance on debt and have not increased borrowings from year-end 2007 levels. We believe we are taking appropriate actions to preserve capital, in part to stabilize this ratio. In particular, our risk management program has contributed to the development of new investment parameters, as discussed above. | |
We seek to maintain a balance between the cost of our property casualty reinsurance and the level of risk we retain. Excluding the $11 million ceded reinsurance reinstatement premium in the third quarter, our 2008 reinsurance costs will be slightly below last years level due to higher retention levels and moderating rates for certain lines of business. We provide more detail on our reinsurance programs in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 7, 2008 Reinsurance Programs, Page 70. Our property casualty reinsurance treaties renew on January 1 and currently we are evaluating the program and participants, and discussing 2009 pricing and terms. | ||
In addition to the ratings of our parent company senior debt, independent ratings firms award our property casualty and life operations insurer financial strength ratings based on their quantitative and qualitative analyses. These ratings assess an insurers ability to meet its financial obligations to policyholders and do not necessarily address all of the matters that may be important to shareholders. Ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agency and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. | ||
We believe that our strong surplus position and superior insurer financial strength ratings are clear, competitive advantages in the segment of the insurance marketplace that our agents serve. Our financial strength supports the consistent, predictable performance that our policyholders, agents, associates and shareholders have always expected and received, and it must be able to withstand significant challenges. We seek to ensure that our performance remains consistent and predictable by aligning agents interests with those of the company, giving them outstanding service and compensation and earning their best business by enhancing their ability to serve the businesses and individuals in their communities. | ||
In June and July 2008, each of the four organizations that rate our companies placed the ratings of our standard market property casualty and life companies on watch or review following our June announcement of significant catastrophe losses and declines in value of our investment assets. Fitch Ratings, Moodys Investors Service and Standard & Poors Ratings Services subsequently lowered their ratings. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
22 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
As of October 28, 2008, our credit and financial strength ratings were: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance Financial Strength Ratings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company | Standard Market Property | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rating | Senior Debt | Casualty Insurance | Life Insurance | Excess and Surplus | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency | Rating | Subsidiaries | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Status (date) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier | Tier | Tier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A. M. Best Co.
|
aa- | A++ | Superior | 1 of 16 | A+ | Superior | 2 of 16 | A | Excellent | 3 of 16 | Under review with negative implications (07/03/08) | |||||||||||||||
Fitch Ratings
|
A- | AA- | Very Strong | 4 of 21 | AA- | Very Strong | 4 of 21 | | | | Negative outlook (07/17/08) | |||||||||||||||
Moodys Investors
Service
|
A3 | A1 | Good | 5 of 21 | | | | | | | Stable outlook (9/25/08) | |||||||||||||||
Standard & Poors
Ratings Services
|
BBB+ | A+ | Strong | 5 of 21 | A+ | Strong | 5 of 21 | | | | Negative outlook (06/30/08) | |||||||||||||||
o | A.M. Best Co. On July 3, 2008, A.M. Best placed under review with negative implications its financial strength and issuer credit ratings for our standard market property casualty insurance group and member companies and for The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company. A.M. Best cited the rapid decline in the value of our equity portfolio, along with an associated decline in future dividend income, significant catastrophic losses and susceptibility to competitive pricing pressures. A.M. Best noted that despite these factors, risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by A.M. Bests Capital Adequacy Ratio, remains well supportive of the current A++ (Superior) rating for the standard market property casualty companies and the current A+ (Superior) rating for The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company. A.M. Best commented that we maintain a large and diversified fixed income portfolio that covers our insurance liabilities. | ||
Our new excess and surplus lines subsidiary maintained its financial strength rating, an A (Excellent) with a stable outlook, from A.M. Best. | |||
o | Fitch Ratings On July 17, 2008, Fitch Ratings removed our three standard market property casualty insurance companies and The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company from rating watch negative, lowering the insurer financial strength ratings to AA- (Very Strong) with a negative outlook. Fitch said its action was primarily driven by the significant decrease in shareholders equity in 2008 as a result of a decline in the value of CFCs investment portfolio, the high level of catastrophe losses, lower investment income and less favorable market conditions. Fitch noted our historically strong operating profitability, which has been better than peers and is derived in part by a competitive advantage from a successful single-channel distribution system that emphasizes building long-term relationships with select independent agents, our low non-commission expense structure, and excellent claims service and conservative reserving practices demonstrated by favorable reserve development. | ||
o | Moodys Investors Service On September 25, 2008, Moodys Investors Service removed our standard market property casualty insurance companies from review, lowering the insurance financial strength ratings to A1. The outlook on the ratings is stable. Moodys said its action reflected reduced shareholders equity and risk-adjusted capitalization, concerns about management of investment portfolio volatility, and increasing commercial lines competition. Moodys noted our strong regional franchise and strong risk-adjusted capitalization reflecting consistent reserve strength and manageable peak-level catastrophe exposure; and an excellent financial leverage profile accompanied by significant holding company liquidity. | ||
o | Standard & Poors Ratings Services On June 30, 2008, Standard & Poors Ratings Services removed our three standard market property casualty insurance companies and The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company from credit watch, lowering the insurer financial strength ratings to A+ (Strong) with a negative outlook. Standard & Poors said its actions reflected our weakened capitalization and current and prospective operating performance, increased market competition and reduced liquidity. Standard & Poors noted support for operating company ratings in view of our capital at the A level, extremely strong and loyal agency force, strong competitive position, improved technological efficiencies, and improved and adequate enterprise risk management. |
Rising slightly from $3.650 billion at June 30, 2008, statutory surplus for our property casualty insurance subsidiary was $3.687 billion at September 30, 2008, compared with $4.307 billion at December 31, 2007, due to the decline in market values for the insurance subsidiarys investment portfolio during the first six months of 2008. The ratio of the property casualty subsidiarys common stock to statutory surplus was 67.5 percent at September 30, 2008, compared with 86.0 percent at year-end. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 23 |
Life statutory surplus was $371 million at September 30, 2008, compared with $477 million at December 31, 2007. The ratio of the life insurance subsidiarys common stock to statutory adjusted capital and surplus was 50.2 percent at September 30, 2008, compared with 70.6 percent at year-end. |
| Commercial lines property casualty insurance |
| Personal lines property casualty insurance |
| Life insurance |
| Investments operations |
| Premiums The 4.9 percent decline in nine-month commercial lines net written premiums is more indicative of current trends than the quarterly measurements this year, which were volatile. While pricing in our industry continues to be very competitive, we feel our current pace for new and renewal business is consistent with our agents practice of selecting and retaining accounts with manageable risk characteristics that support the lower prevailing prices. We believe the pace also reflects the advantages we achieve through our field focus, which provides us with quality intelligence on local market conditions. | |
The rate of decline in net written premiums was increased by the $4 million ceded reinsurance reinstatement allocated to the commercial lines area. New business activity remained healthy in the third quarter and we continued to benefit from our strong agency relationships and policyholder retention. | ||
New commercial lines business written directly by agencies rose 6.0 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2008, to $77 million from $72 million and rose 6.3 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, to $229 million from $216 million. New business growth was bolstered by a number of factors, including: |
o | New appointments The agencies appointed in 2007 and 2008 contributed $21 million in new commercial lines business. | ||
o | Excess and surplus lines Additional standard market business was written for policyholders who selected Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters to provide certain excess and surplus lines coverages. | ||
o | Carrier consolidation by agencies We benefited from efforts to make it easier for our agencies to consolidate their books of business as some choose to manage their expenses by reducing the number of carriers they represent. |
We continue to make case-by-case decisions not to write or renew certain business. In this environment, we have been careful to maintain our underwriting discipline. We continue to use rate credits to retain renewals of quality business and earn new business. Our experience remains that the larger the account, the higher the credits, with variations by geographic region and class of business. Pricing pressure on new business remains competitive as many carriers appear to be managing the soft market by working aggressively to protect their renewal portfolios. For renewal business, the typical pricing decline has moved into the high-single-digits, although higher declines occur. |
| Combined ratio Despite the 3.8 percentage point rise in the contribution of catastrophe losses for the three months ended September 30, 2008, our commercial lines combined ratio improved slightly due to higher savings from favorable development on prior year reserves and substantially lower non-catastrophe weather-related losses. The contribution from catastrophe losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, rose by 5.5 percentage points, contributing to the deterioration in the combined ratio even with |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
24 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
higher savings. Other factors contributing to the change in the ratio were lower pricing, normal loss cost inflation and higher underwriting expenses. Lower commission expenses partially offset these increases. | ||
Our commercial lines statutory combined ratio was 97.3 percent and 95.9 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with 97.3 percent and 89.2 percent in the comparable 2007 periods. |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 538 | $ | 544 | (1.2 | ) | $ | 1,759 | $ | 1,851 | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 582 | $ | 600 | (3.0 | ) | $ | 1,743 | $ | 1,810 | (3.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes |
348 | 395 | (11.8 | ) | 1,034 | 1,068 | (3.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses |
23 | 1 | nm | 112 | 17 | 574.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commission expenses |
91 | 94 | (4.3 | ) | 304 | 330 | (7.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting expenses |
87 | 79 | 10.6 | 223 | 202 | 10.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder dividends |
3 | 3 | 0.8 | 11 | 9 | 18.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Underwriting profit |
$ | 30 | $ | 28 | 7.2 | $ | 59 | $ | 184 | (67.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes |
59.8 | % | 65.8 | % | 59.3 | % | 59.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses |
4.0 | 0.2 | 6.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses |
63.8 | % | 66.0 | % | 65.7 | % | 59.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commission expenses |
15.6 | 15.8 | 17.5 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Underwriting expenses |
14.9 | 13.1 | 12.8 | 11.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder dividends |
0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
94.9 | % | 95.4 | % | 96.6 | % | 89.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Market conditions and related decline in premiums We believe the weaker economy is tempering current market conditions by holding back exposure growth. During the first nine months of 2008, we continued to receive agent reports of pricing pressure on renewal business and reports of requirements for more flexibility and more careful risk selection for new business pricing. In addition to pricing pressures, premiums confirmed by audits of policyholder sales and payrolls declined for the first nine months of 2008. For our workers compensation business line, the loss and loss expense ratio deterioration over last year largely reflected the soft pricing due to competition and volatility in long-term payout patterns. |
| Catastrophe losses Catastrophe losses were significantly higher than the unusually low year-ago levels. The catastrophe losses largely affected our commercial property, specialty package and machinery and equipment lines of business. | |
In the third quarter of 2008, we also had approximately $9 million of commercial lines losses from weather events that were not classified as catastrophes by Property Claims Service. In the comparable 2007 period, we had $21 million of similar non-catastrophe weather losses, including $11 million from three unusually large commercial property losses. The lower level of non-catastrophe weather-related losses was the primary reason for the improvement in the commercial property loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophe losses for the three months ended September 30, 2008. |
| Large losses We continue to monitor new losses and case reserve increases greater than $250,000 for trends in factors such as initial reserve levels, loss cost inflation and settlement expenses. In the third quarter of 2008, these losses and case reserve increases were up $2 million compared with last years third quarter. These losses contributed an additional 1.1 percentage points to the combined ratio, reflecting consistent losses on lower earned premiums. We believe the increase largely reflected normal fluctuations in loss patterns, normal variability in the large case reserves for our workers compensation claims and a higher number of surety and executive risk losses above $250,000. The rise in the loss and loss expense ratio for the surety and executive risk business line for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, largely reflected larger executive risk losses in the 2008 second and third quarters. | |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 25 |
Our analysis continues to indicate no unexpected concentration of these losses and reserve increases by risk category, geographic region, policy inception, agency or field marketing territory. |
| Savings from favorable development on prior year reserves Savings from favorable development improved the loss and loss expense ratio by 15.0 and 10.1 percentage points in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Savings improved the ratio by 7.1 and 5.6 percentage points in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
New losses greater than $4,000,000 |
$ | 5 | $ | 0 | nm | $ | 31 | $ | 0 | nm | ||||||||||||||
New losses $2,000,000-$4,000,000 |
17 | 47 | (64.2 | ) | 56 | 81 | (30.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
New losses $1,000,000-$2,000,000 |
26 | 25 | 5.1 | 60 | 71 | (16.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
New losses $750,000-$1,000,000 |
12 | 8 | 63.2 | 31 | 23 | 36.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
New losses $500,000-$750,000 |
14 | 11 | 16.5 | 34 | 34 | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
New losses $250,000-$500,000 |
25 | 18 | 40.3 | 70 | 53 | 33.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Case reserve development above $250,000 |
57 | 45 | 26.3 | 153 | 140 | 8.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total large losses incurred |
156 | 154 | 1.4 | 435 | 402 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other losses excluding catastrophes |
144 | 164 | (13.0 | ) | 421 | 441 | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe losses |
23 | 1 | nm | 112 | 17 | 615.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total losses incurred |
$ | 323 | $ | 319 | 1.4 | $ | 968 | $ | 860 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||||
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New losses greater than $4,000,000 |
0.9 | % | 0.1 | % | 1.8 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
New losses $2,000,000-$4,000,000 |
2.9 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $1,000,000-$2,000,000 |
4.5 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $750,000-$1,000,000 |
2.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $500,000-$750,000 |
2.3 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $250,000-$500,000 |
4.3 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Case reserve development above $250,000 |
9.8 | 7.5 | 8.8 | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total large loss ratio |
26.8 | 25.7 | 24.9 | 22.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other losses excluding catastrophes |
24.6 | 27.3 | 24.2 | 24.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe losses |
4.0 | 0.2 | 6.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total loss ratio |
55.4 | % | 53.2 | % | 55.5 | % | 47.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
26 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial casualty: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 171 | $ | 179 | (4.1 | ) | $ | 582 | $ | 641 | (9.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
197 | 205 | (4.4 | ) | 580 | 623 | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
87 | 131 | (33.4 | ) | 275 | 358 | (23.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
44.4 | % | 63.7 | % | 47.4 | % | 57.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
44.4 | 63.7 | 47.4 | 57.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(31.2 | ) | (12.5 | ) | (23.5 | ) | (18.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial property: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 117 | $ | 120 | (2.7 | ) | $ | 364 | $ | 383 | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
120 | 125 | (4.0 | ) | 364 | 373 | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
84 | 77 | 9.3 | 296 | 200 | 47.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
70.0 | % | 61.5 | % | 81.1 | % | 53.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
54.4 | 62.9 | 57.7 | 50.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(3.6 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial auto: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 93 | $ | 92 | 0.5 | $ | 308 | $ | 329 | (6.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
103 | 108 | (4.7 | ) | 308 | 331 | (6.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
65 | 72 | (9.9 | ) | 199 | 213 | (6.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
63.2 | % | 66.9 | % | 64.7 | % | 64.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
63.1 | 66.5 | 63.7 | 64.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(8.7 | ) | (7.1 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Workers compensation: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 84 | $ | 84 | 0.3 | $ | 292 | $ | 289 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
93 | 94 | (0.6 | ) | 282 | 280 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
85 | 77 | 10.3 | 219 | 210 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
90.9 | % | 82.0 | % | 77.9 | % | 75.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
90.9 | 82.0 | 77.9 | 75.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(5.3 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (6.8 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty packages: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 36 | $ | 34 | 6.6 | $ | 109 | $ | 111 | (1.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
35 | 36 | (1.8 | ) | 107 | 109 | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
28 | 28 | 2.7 | 91 | 71 | 27.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
80.2 | % | 76.7 | % | 84.6 | % | 65.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
68.0 | 70.5 | 63.1 | 60.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(5.7 | ) | 1.0 | (0.9 | ) | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Surety and executive risk: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 29 | $ | 28 | 3.5 | $ | 82 | $ | 76 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
27 | 25 | 8.1 | 80 | 73 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
20 | 9 | 117.8 | 57 | 27 | 113.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
73.6 | % | 36.5 | % | 71.3 | % | 36.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
73.6 | 36.5 | 71.3 | 36.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(21.5 | ) | 0.9 | (2.4 | ) | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 8 | $ | 7 | 2.3 | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
7 | 7 | 3.8 | 22 | 21 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
2 | 2 | (3.1 | ) | 9 | 6 | 47.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
32.4 | % | 34.7 | % | 39.8 | % | 27.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
29.6 | 33.4 | 38.5 | 27.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss expense ratio |
(2.3 | ) | (4.8 | ) | 2.9 | (5.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 27 |
| Premiums Personal lines written premiums declined slightly for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, in part due to the $7 million ceded reinsurance reinstatement premium in the third quarter. New business growth only partially offset lower policy counts and pricing changes that reduced premiums per policy. Pricing changes included an expanded program of policy credits that incorporate insurance scores and are intended to improve our ability to compete for our agents highest quality personal lines accounts. | |
Personal lines new business premiums written directly by our agencies rose 11.8 percent to $11 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, and 6.7 percent to $30 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Agencies that initiated or expanded their use of Cincinnatis personal lines products in the past 18 months were important contributors to the growth. | ||
We continue to implement strategies discussed in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1, Our Business and Our Strategies, Page 35, to enhance our response to marketplace changes and help us achieve our long-term objectives. Agents report they are pleased with our efforts to make it easier to process our business, and we continue to attract agencies that previously marketed only commercial lines for us to market our personal insurance policies. Since the beginning of 2007, 110 agencies that previously marketed only our commercial lines products have been appointed to market our personal lines products. The opportunity to appoint these agents arose as we completed deployment of our processing system to the states where we actively market. We were then able to leverage this technology with the goal of increasing our scale and geographical diversity. In 2008, we expanded our operations into two new states and increased our product offerings in two additional, established states. Our personal lines of insurance are now available in 27 states, up from 25 at year-end 2007. | ||
Our field marketing representatives are strengthening relationships with agency customer service representatives and offering educational opportunities to agency staff. We now locate specialized personal lines field marketing representatives available in states where our personal lines automation has allowed us to introduce or broaden our product line offerings, also helping to diversify our premiums geographically. | ||
| Combined ratio The personal lines combined ratio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, rose largely because of higher catastrophe losses. Lower pricing and normal loss cost inflation continued to weigh on personal lines results. However, the personal auto loss and loss expense ratio remained very healthy at 62.7 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Commission and other underwriting expenses declined for the nine-month period but rose slightly for the three months. | |
Our personal lines statutory combined ratio was 120.6 percent and 114.9 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, versus 103.6 percent and 98.3 percent in the comparable 2007 periods, when catastrophe losses were atypically low. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
28 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 184 | $ | 192 | (4.0 | ) | $ | 525 | $ | 541 | (3.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 167 | $ | 177 | (5.4 | ) | $ | 518 | $ | 538 | (3.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes |
111 | 116 | (4.1 | ) | 328 | 341 | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses |
40 | 12 | 222.3 | 107 | 11 | 858.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commission expenses |
32 | 33 | (2.1 | ) | 103 | 110 | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting expenses |
22 | 23 | (2.5 | ) | 62 | 68 | (9.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriting profit (loss) |
$ | (38 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | (457.8 | ) | $ | (82 | ) | $ | 8 | nm | ||||||||||
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes |
66.3 | % | 65.4 | % | 63.3 | % | 63.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses |
23.8 | 7.0 | 20.7 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses |
90.1 | % | 72.4 | % | 84.0 | % | 65.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commission expenses |
19.4 | 18.7 | 19.9 | 20.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Underwriting expenses |
13.0 | 12.7 | 12.0 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Combined ratio |
122.5 | % | 103.8 | % | 115.9 | % | 98.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Catastrophe losses Catastrophe losses added 23.8 and 20.7 percentage points to the combined ratio in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Catastrophe losses added 7.0 and 2.1 percentage points to the combined ratio in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The contribution of non-catastrophe weather-related losses rose to 1.8 and 5.7 percentage points for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with 1.6 and 4.9 points in the comparable 2007 periods. | |
| Savings from favorable development on prior year reserves Savings from favorable development improved the loss and loss expense ratio by 9.1 and 5.1 percentage points in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Savings improved the segment ratio by 4.0 and 4.6 percentage points in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. | |
Fluctuations in prior period reserve development for the personal lines segment largely reflected quarterly fluctuations in savings for the other personal line of business, which includes personal umbrella coverages. We expect reserves for personal umbrella coverages to be highly volatile due to the nature of the coverages and claims presented. | ||
| Large losses We continue to monitor new losses and case reserve increases greater than $250,000 for trends in factors such as initial reserve levels, loss cost inflation and settlement expenses. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, these losses were above the year-ago level due to a sizeable new case reserve related to a single large personal watercraft loss. | |
Our analysis continues to indicate no unexpected concentration of these losses and reserve increases by risk category, geographic region, policy inception, agency or field marketing territory. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 29 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
New losses greater than $4,000,000 |
$ | 5 | $ | 0 | nm | $ | 5 | $ | 0 | nm | ||||||||||||||
New losses $2,000,000-$4,000,000 |
0 | 7 | (100.0 | ) | 0 | 11 | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
New losses $1,000,000-$2,000,000 |
6 | 1 | 355.1 | 12 | 10 | 23.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
New losses $750,000-$1,000,000 |
2 | 1 | 8.8 | 4 | 6 | (20.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
New losses $500,000-$750,000 |
2 | 3 | (19.0 | ) | 6 | 8 | (23.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
New losses $250,000-$500,000 |
8 | 6 | 69.7 | 20 | 17 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Case reserve development above $250,000 |
2 | 5 | (53.3 | ) | 9 | 12 | (21.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total large losses incurred |
25 | 23 | 14.5 | 56 | 64 | (10.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other losses excluding catastrophes |
68 | 78 | (11.8 | ) | 220 | 232 | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe losses |
40 | 12 | 222.3 | 107 | 11 | 858.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total losses incurred |
$ | 133 | $ | 113 | 19.3 | $ | 383 | $ | 307 | 25.6 | ||||||||||||||
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New losses greater than $4,000,000 |
3.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.0 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
New losses $2,000,000-$4,000,000 |
0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $1,000,000-$2,000,000 |
3.8 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $750,000-$1,000,000 |
1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $500,000-$750,000 |
1.3 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
New losses $250,000-$500,000 |
4.8 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Case reserve development above $250,000 |
1.4 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total large losses incurred |
15.3 | 13.2 | 10.9 | 11.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other losses excluding catastrophes |
40.6 | 43.6 | 42.6 | 43.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Catastrophe losses |
23.8 | 7.0 | 20.7 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total loss ratio |
79.7 | % | 63.8 | % | 74.2 | % | 57.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
30 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Personal auto: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 88 | $ | 92 | (4.1 | ) | $ | 246 | $ | 256 | (4.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
81 | 85 | (4.2 | ) | 245 | 259 | (5.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
52 | 57 | (9.9 | ) | 154 | 174 | (11.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
63.7 | % | 67.7 | % | 62.7 | % | 67.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
62.0 | 67.0 | 60.5 | 67.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss
expense ratio |
(5.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (3.1 | ) | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Homeowner: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 72 | $ | 77 | (5.6 | ) | $ | 212 | $ | 218 | (3.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
64 | 70 | (8.4 | ) | 208 | 214 | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
79 | 58 | 36.1 | 238 | 142 | 67.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
122.8 | % | 82.7 | % | 114.6 | % | 66.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
68.3 | 67.1 | 68.4 | 61.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss
expense ratio |
(4.0 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (3.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other personal: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 24 | $ | 23 | 1.9 | $ | 67 | $ | 67 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
22 | 22 | (0.4 | ) | 65 | 65 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expenses incurred |
20 | 13 | 57.6 | 43 | 36 | 20.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio |
91.5 | % | 57.9 | % | 65.8 | % | 54.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophes |
77.0 | 54.2 | 56.9 | 52.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve development impact on loss and loss
expense ratio |
(38.5 | ) | (27.4 | ) | (26.3 | ) | (37.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenues Revenues were lower for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, because of lower earned premiums and lower separate account management fees. Gross in-force policy face amounts increased to $64.901 billion at September 30, 2008, from $61.875 billion at year-end 2007. | |
Earned premiums declined largely because of adjustments due to our annual evaluation of our unearned front-end load liability, an actuarial calculation determined by investment return, mortality and other assumptions. Total statutory life insurance net written premiums were up for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, to $44 million and $135 million, compared with $39 million and |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
31 |
$126 million in the comparable 2007 periods. Total statutory written premiums for life insurance operations for all periods include life insurance, annuity and accident and health premiums. The increase in total statutory life insurance written premiums primarily was due to sales of term life insurance and annuity products. | ||
Earned premiums also declined because fee income from universal life products was down 44.1 percent and 22.4 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, principally reflecting an increase in our liability for unearned front-end loads, an actuarial adjustment. | ||
Separate account investment management fee income made no contribution to total revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared with a $1 million contribution in the comparable prior 2007 period. This fee income contributed $1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with $4 million in the year-ago period. These fees declined primarily because of $6 million of valuation impairments of the $477 million fixed-maturity portfolio backing our separate account products. |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Written premiums |
$ | 44 | $ | 39 | 13.9 | $ | 135 | $ | 126 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 30 | $ | 34 | (12.2 | ) | $ | 93 | $ | 99 | (6.8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Separate account investment
management fees |
0 | 1 | (103.7 | ) | 1 | 4 | (61.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
30 | 35 | (15.2 | ) | 94 | 103 | (8.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Contract holders benefits incurred |
41 | 36 | 11.5 | 114 | 98 | 16.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment interest credited to
contract holders |
(16 | ) | (14 | ) | 10.7 | (47 | ) | (43 | ) | 10.4 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses incurred |
11 | 15 | (21.7 | ) | 33 | 44 | (25.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
36 | 37 | (1.5 | ) | 100 | 99 | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Life insurance segment profit (loss) |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | (274.4 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 4 | (270.9 | ) | |||||||||
| Profitability The life insurance segment frequently reports only a small profit or loss on a GAAP basis because most of its investment income is included in investment segment results. We include investment income credited to contract holders (interest assumed in life insurance policy reserve calculations) in life insurance segment results. Due to less favorable mortality and the lower separate account management fees, the segment reported a loss of $6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared with a loss of $2 million in the year-ago period. Primarily due to the less favorable mortality expense, the segment reported a loss of $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with profit of $4 million in the year-ago period. | |
At the same time, we recognize that assets under management, capital appreciation and investment income are integral to evaluation of the success of the life insurance segment because of the long duration of life products. For that reason, we also evaluate GAAP data, including all investment activities on life insurance-related assets including investment income and realized gains or losses on investments. Due to realized investment losses in 2008, the life insurance company reported a GAAP net loss in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, of $24 million and $20 million, respectively. The life insurance company portfolio had after-tax realized investment losses of $29 million and $44 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, realized investment losses were minimal, and we reported a gain of $33 million in the nine-month period. | ||
Life segment expenses consist principally of contract holders (policyholders) benefits incurred related to traditional life and interest-sensitive products and operating expenses incurred, net of deferred acquisition costs. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
32 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 83 | $ | 77 | 6.8 | $ | 238 | $ | 229 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends |
46 | 75 | (38.9 | ) | 169 | 219 | (22.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
3 | 4 | (7.3 | ) | 10 | 11 | (4.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment expenses |
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | 52.2 | (5 | ) | (8 | ) | 37.8 | ||||||||||||||
Total investment income, net of expenses |
130 | 152 | (14.5 | ) | 412 | 451 | (8.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment interest credited to contract
holders |
(16 | ) | (14 | ) | (10.7 | ) | (47 | ) | (43 | ) | (10.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Realized investment gains and losses summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized investment gains and losses |
401 | 20 | nm | 441 | 371 | 19.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of securities with
embedded derivatives |
(8 | ) | (3 | ) | (174.8 | ) | (13 | ) | 1 | nm | ||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment charges |
(121 | ) | (1 | ) | nm | (400 | ) | (2 | ) | nm | ||||||||||||||
Total realized investment gains and losses |
272 | 16 | nm | 28 | 370 | (92.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Investment operations income |
$ | 386 | $ | 154 | 151.6 | $ | 393 | $ | 778 | (49.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
| $401 million in net gains from investment sales and bond calls including $360 million from sales of 38 million shares of Fifth Third, $112 million from the sale of other financial stocks and $27 million from the sale of various non-financial common stock holdings. These gains were partially offset by realized losses of $80 million, primarily resulting from the sales of certain distressed bonds and preferred and common shares in the financial sector. | |
| $8 million in losses from changes in fair value of securities with embedded derivatives. | |
| $121 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges to write down holdings of bonds and preferred stocks of financial services issuers including $47 million to write down holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
33 |
| $40 million in net gains reflecting sales as discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of this year. | |
| $5 million in losses from changes in fair value of securities with embedded derivatives. | |
| $279 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of this year. For the year-to-date period, impairment of equity securities accounted for more than 80 percent of the total, reflecting our portfolio mix, our historic weighting in financial sector securities and the unprecedented decline in overall stock market values during 2008. |
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Fixed maturities |
||||||||
Financial |
$ | (51 | ) | $ | 0 | |||
Real estate |
(16 | ) | 0 | |||||
Consumer cyclical |
(4 | ) | 0 | |||||
Service cyclical |
(3 | ) | 0 | |||||
Other |
(3 | ) | 0 | |||||
Total fixed maturies |
(77 | ) | 0 | |||||
Common equities |
||||||||
Financial |
(184 | ) | 0 | |||||
Health |
(30 | ) | 0 | |||||
Real estate |
0 | (2 | ) | |||||
Total common equities |
(214 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Preferred equities |
||||||||
Agency |
(59 | ) | 0 | |||||
Financial |
(49 | ) | 0 | |||||
Other |
(1 | ) | 0 | |||||
Total preferred equities |
(109 | ) | 0 | |||||
Total |
$ | (400 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | ||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
34 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | 2008 | 2007 | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans and leases |
$ | 2 | $ | 2 | (14.9 | ) | $ | 6 | $ | 8 | (20.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Money management fees |
1 | 1 | (7.3 | ) | 2 | 2 | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
2 | (1 | ) | 412.3 | 3 | 1 | 81.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
5 | 2 | 107.5 | 11 | 11 | (3.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Underwriting expenses |
3 | 0 | nm | 3 | 0 | nm | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
3 | 3 | (6.2 | ) | 12 | 8 | 45.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
15 | 12 | 13.1 | 40 | 38 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses |
21 | 15 | 24.8 | 55 | 46 | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax loss |
$ | (16 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | (10.9 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | (22.7 | ) | ||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
35 |
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Premiums collected |
$ | 2,379 | $ | 2,454 | ||||
Loss and loss expenses paid |
(1,547 | ) | (1,407 | ) | ||||
Commissions and other underwriting expenses paid |
(818 | ) | (816 | ) | ||||
Insurance subsidiary cash flow from underwriting |
14 | 231 | ||||||
Investment income received |
374 | 376 | ||||||
Insurance subsidiary operating cash flow |
$ | 388 | $ | 607 | ||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
36 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
| Commissions Commissions paid declined slightly in the first nine months of 2008. Commission payments generally track with written premiums. | |
| Other operating expenses Many of our operating expenses are not contractual obligations, but reflect the ongoing expenses of our business. Non-commission operating expenses paid rose in the first nine months of 2008, reflecting higher staffing costs. | |
In addition to contractual obligations for hardware and software, we anticipate capitalizing $7 million in spending for key technology initiatives in 2008. Capitalized development costs related to key technology initiatives were $5 million in the first nine months of 2008. These activities are conducted at our discretion, and we have no material contractual obligations for activities planned as part of these projects. | ||
| Business continuity and backup data processing center We are in the process of discussing pricing and terms with a number of vendors for backup data processing facilities and a business continuity center. Our goal is to substantially reduce the investment required to renovate a property that may now serve only as a business continuity facility. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 37 |
| Dividends to shareholders In February 2008, the board of directors authorized a 9.9 percent increase in the regular quarterly cash dividend to an indicated annual rate of $1.56 per share. During the first nine months of 2008, $186 million was used for cash dividends to shareholders. | |
| Common stock repurchase program No shares were repurchased during the third quarter. Reflecting purchases in the first half of the year, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we used $139 million to repurchase 3.8 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $36.28. The details of the 2008 repurchase activity and repurchase authorizations are described in Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, Page 46. We do not adjust number of shares repurchased and average price per repurchased share for stock dividends. | |
Our board remains committed to stock repurchase as a means of enhancing shareholder value. We generally make common repurchases when we believe the open market stock price is favorable; however, we are limiting our activity in the second half of 2008 to help conserve capital. We would continue to expect that annual repurchases would offset dilution from share-based compensation. |
Loss reserves | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Case | IBNR | expense | gross | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | reserves | reserves | reserves | reserves | of total | |||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial casualty |
$ | 1,063 | $ | 373 | $ | 514 | $ | 1,950 | 52.8 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial property |
157 | 21 | 34 | 212 | 5.8 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial auto |
265 | 49 | 64 | 378 | 10.3 | |||||||||||||||
Workers compensation |
443 | 317 | 120 | 880 | 23.9 | |||||||||||||||
Specialty packages |
80 | 5 | 11 | 96 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
Surety and executive risk |
119 | 1 | 44 | 164 | 4.4 | |||||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,130 | $ | 769 | $ | 788 | $ | 3,687 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
At December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial casualty |
$ | 1,035 | $ | 389 | $ | 524 | $ | 1,948 | 55.1 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial property |
104 | 6 | 29 | 139 | 3.9 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial auto |
276 | 48 | 65 | 389 | 11.0 | |||||||||||||||
Workers compensation |
426 | 315 | 119 | 860 | 24.3 | |||||||||||||||
Specialty packages |
67 | 1 | 9 | 77 | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||
Surety and executive risk |
68 | 2 | 42 | 112 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,980 | $ | 764 | $ | 789 | $ | 3,533 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Loss reserves | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Case | IBNR | expense | gross | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | reserves | reserves | reserves | reserves | of total | |||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Personal auto |
$ | 138 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | 164 | 37.6 | % | |||||||||
Homeowners |
94 | 35 | 18 | 147 | 33.6 | |||||||||||||||
Other personal |
55 | 59 | 12 | 126 | 28.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 287 | $ | 92 | $ | 58 | $ | 437 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
At December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Personal auto |
$ | 163 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | 189 | 48.2 | % | |||||||||
Homeowners |
61 | 8 | 14 | 83 | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||
Other personal |
54 | 54 | 12 | 120 | 30.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 278 | $ | 58 | $ | 56 | $ | 392 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
38 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
At September 30, 2008 | At December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Book value | % of BV | Fair value | % of FV | Book value | % of BV | Fair value | % of FV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable fixed maturities |
$ | 3,345 | 39.1 | % | $ | 3,191 | 31.6 | % | $ | 3,265 | 36.9 | % | $ | 3,284 | 26.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt fixed maturities |
2,598 | 30.4 | 2,538 | 25.2 | 2,518 | 28.4 | 2,564 | 21.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common equities |
2,183 | 25.5 | 3,937 | 39.1 | 2,715 | 30.7 | 6,020 | 49.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred equities |
217 | 2.5 | 200 | 2.0 | 260 | 2.9 | 229 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
212 | 2.5 | 212 | 2.1 | 101 | 1.1 | 101 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,555 | 100.0 | % | $ | 10,078 | 100.0 | % | $ | 8,859 | 100.0 | % | $ | 12,198 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 39 |
At September 30, 2008 | At December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Percent | Fair | Percent | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | value | to total | value | to total | ||||||||||||
Moodys Ratings |
||||||||||||||||
Aaa, Aa, A |
$ | 3,501 | 58.9 | % | $ | 4,103 | 69.0 | % | ||||||||
Baa |
1,391 | 23.4 | 1,070 | 17.9 | ||||||||||||
Ba |
244 | 4.1 | 280 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||
B |
66 | 1.1 | 105 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Caa |
16 | 0.3 | 36 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Non-rated |
723 | 12.2 | 355 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,941 | 100.0 | % | $ | 5,949 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Standard & Poors Ratings |
||||||||||||||||
AAA, AA, A |
$ | 3,110 | 52.4 | % | $ | 3,589 | 60.3 | % | ||||||||
BBB |
1,372 | 23.1 | 1,092 | 18.4 | ||||||||||||
BB |
245 | 4.1 | 258 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
B |
77 | 1.3 | 125 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
CCC |
11 | 0.2 | 33 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Non-rated |
1,126 | 18.9 | 852 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,941 | 100.0 | % | $ | 5,949 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Nine months ended | Years ended | |||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Weighted average yield-to-book value |
5.5 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||
Weighted average maturity |
8.4 | yrs | 8.0 | yrs | ||||
Effective duration |
5.6 | yrs | 4.8 | yrs |
| $417 million in U.S. agency paper that is rated Aaa/AAA by Moodys and Standard & Poors, respectively. | |
| $2.322 billion in investment-grade corporate bonds that have a Moodys rating at or above Baa 3 or a Standard & Poors rating at or above BBB-. | |
| $257 million in high-yield corporate bonds that have a Moodys rating below Baa-3 or a Standard & Poors rating below BBB-. | |
| $208 million in convertible bonds and redeemable preferred stocks. |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
40 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Fair value of | ||||||||||||
fixed maturity | 100 basis point | 100 basis point | ||||||||||
(In millions) | portfolio | spread decrease | spread increase | |||||||||
At September 30, 2008 |
$ | 5,729 | $ | 6,047 | $ | 5,411 | ||||||
At December 31, 2007 |
5,848 | 6,131 | 5,565 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 41 |
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Earned | ||||||||||||||||
Fair | Percent of | dividend | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Cost | value | fair value | income | ||||||||||||
The Procter & Gamble Company |
$ | 206 | $ | 524 | 13.3 | % | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Fifth Third Bancorp |
29 | 348 | 8.8 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Exxon Mobil Corporation |
36 | 296 | 7.5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Bancorp |
188 | 287 | 7.3 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Johnson & Johnson |
221 | 280 | 7.1 | 5 | ||||||||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
37 | 239 | 6.1 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Company |
92 | 194 | 4.9 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. |
64 | 180 | 4.6 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Wyeth |
62 | 163 | 4.1 | 4 | ||||||||||||
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. |
113 | 145 | 3.7 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Chevron Corporation |
56 | 109 | 2.8 | 3 | ||||||||||||
General Electric Company |
120 | 93 | 2.4 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Pepsico, Inc. |
72 | 83 | 2.1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Pfizer, Inc. |
77 | 81 | 2.1 | 4 | ||||||||||||
All other common stock holdings (33) |
810 | 915 | 23.2 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,183 | $ | 3,937 | 100.0 | % | $ | 147 | ||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
42 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Percent of Publicly Traded Common Stock Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2008 | At December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Cincinnati | S&P 500 Industry | Cincinnati | S&P 500 Industry | |||||||||||||
Financial | Weightings | Financial | Weightings | |||||||||||||
Sector: |
||||||||||||||||
Financial |
32.4 | % | 15.8 | % | 56.2 | % | 17.6 | % | ||||||||
Healthcare |
15.8 | 13.1 | 10.2 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
12.2 | 13.4 | 11.5 | 12.9 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Staples |
16.1 | 12.2 | 10.7 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||
Utilities |
7.9 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary |
4.8 | 8.5 | 2.8 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Information Technology |
3.6 | 15.9 | 1.9 | 16.8 | ||||||||||||
Industrials |
5.4 | 11.1 | 1.9 | 11.5 | ||||||||||||
Materials |
1.2 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Telecomm Services |
0.6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
| 1,228 of these holdings were trading between 90 percent and 100 percent of book value. The value of these securities fluctuates primarily because of changes in interest rates. The fair value of these 1,228 securities was $3.987 billion at September 30, 2008, and they accounted for $164 million in unrealized losses. | |
| 188 of these holdings were trading between 70 percent and 90 percent of book value at September 30, 2008. The fair value of these holdings was $707 million, and they accounted for $129 million in unrealized losses. These securities, which are being closely monitored, have been affected by a combination of factors including wider credit spreads driven primarily by the distress in the mortgage market, slumping real estate valuations, the effects of a slowing economy and the effects of higher interest rates on longer duration instruments. The majority of these securities are in the financial sector. | |
| 22 securities were trading below 70 percent of book value at September 30, 2008. The fair value of those holdings was $71 million, and they accounted for $45 million in unrealized losses. Twenty of these 22 securities are bonds of companies in the troubled financial sector. These companies have events pending that we believe should have a positive impact on their market values that would be sufficient to |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 43 |
remove them from consideration for impairment. All of these securities currently have investment grade ratings. |
6 Months or less | > 6 - 12 Months | > 12 - 24 Months | > 24 - 36 Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | unrealized | Number | unrealized | Number | unrealized | Number | unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | of issues | gain/loss | of issues | gain/loss | of issues | gain/loss | of issues | gain/loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
19 | $ | (36 | ) | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
329 | (73 | ) | 86 | (32 | ) | 43 | (18 | ) | 52 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
79 | 1 | 36 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 148 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
427 | (108 | ) | 122 | (30 | ) | 59 | (17 | ) | 200 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
604 | (35 | ) | 199 | (31 | ) | 25 | (5 | ) | 42 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
10 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 93 | 2 | 254 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
614 | (35 | ) | 229 | (31 | ) | 118 | (3 | ) | 296 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common equities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
16 | (54 | ) | 5 | (13 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 19 | 1,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
22 | (42 | ) | 5 | (13 | ) | 1 | 17 | 19 | 1,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred equities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
2 | (9 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
5 | (4 | ) | 4 | (5 | ) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
22 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
29 | (13 | ) | 7 | (4 | ) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
22 | (45 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of
book value |
954 | (166 | ) | 299 | (81 | ) | 69 | (23 | ) | 94 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
118 | 13 | 69 | 3 | 110 | 20 | 421 | 1,825 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,094 | $ | (198 | ) | 368 | $ | (78 | ) | 179 | $ | (3 | ) | 515 | $ | 1,802 | |||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
44 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||
Number | Book | Fair | unrealised | investment | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | of issues | value | value | gain/loss | income | |||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
19 | $ | 92 | $ | 56 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | 4 | ||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
510 | 2,266 | 2,126 | (140 | ) | 88 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
279 | 987 | 1,009 | 22 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
808 | 3,345 | 3,191 | (154 | ) | 159 | ||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
870 | 1,840 | 1,763 | (77 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
387 | 758 | 775 | 17 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
1,257 | 2,598 | 2,538 | (60 | ) | 84 | ||||||||||||||
Common equities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
21 | 714 | 647 | (67 | ) | 11 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
25 | 1,469 | 3,290 | 1,821 | 127 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
47 | 2,183 | 3,937 | 1,754 | 146 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred equities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
2 | 23 | 14 | (9 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
10 | 64 | 55 | (9 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
25 | 130 | 131 | 1 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
37 | 217 | 200 | (17 | ) | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
5 | 104 | 104 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
2 | 108 | 108 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 212 | 212 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
22 | 115 | 70 | (45 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
1,416 | 4,988 | 4,695 | (293 | ) | 157 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
718 | 3,452 | 5,313 | 1,861 | 214 | |||||||||||||||
Investment income on securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
2,156 | $ | 8,555 | $ | 10,078 | $ | 1,523 | $ | 406 | |||||||||||
At December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trading below 70% of book value |
3 | $ | 18 | $ | 12 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Trading at 70% to less than 100% of book value |
370 | 2,064 | 1,882 | (182 | ) | 92 | ||||||||||||||
Trading at 100% and above of book value |
1,680 | 6,777 | 10,304 | 3,527 | 473 | |||||||||||||||
Investment income on securities sold in current year |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
2,053 | $ | 8,859 | $ | 12,198 | $ | 3,339 | $ | 601 | |||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | 45 |
| that information required to be disclosed in the companys reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and |
| that such information is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Total number of | Maximum number of | |||||||||||||||
shares purchased as | shares that may yet | |||||||||||||||
Total number | Average | part of publicly | be purchased under | |||||||||||||
of shares | price paid | announced plans or | the plans or | |||||||||||||
Month | purchased | per share | programs | programs | ||||||||||||
January 1-31, 2008 |
71,003 | $ | 0.00 | 71,003 | 12,293,608 | |||||||||||
February 1-29, 2008 |
1,192,197 | 37.51 | 1,192,197 | 11,101,411 | ||||||||||||
March 1-31, 2008 |
1,736,800 | 37.15 | 1,736,800 | 9,364,611 | ||||||||||||
April 1-30, 2008 |
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 9,364,611 | ||||||||||||
May 1-31, 2008 |
750,957 | 35.88 | 750,000 | 8,614,611 | ||||||||||||
June 1-30, 2008 |
71,003 | 34.59 | 71,003 | 8,543,608 | ||||||||||||
July 1-31, 2008 |
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,543,608 | ||||||||||||
August 1-31, 2008 |
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,543,608 | ||||||||||||
September 1-30, 2008 |
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 8,543,608 | ||||||||||||
Totals |
3,821,960 | 36.28 | 3,821,003 | |||||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | ||
46 | Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
3.1A
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to the companys 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 23, 2000) (File No. 000-04604) | |
3.1B
|
Amendment to Article Fourth of Amended Articles of Incorporation of Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2005) | |
3.2
|
Regulations of Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 2, 1992, Exhibit 2) (File No. 000-04604) | |
4.1
|
Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2004, filed with respect to the issuance of the companys 6.125% Senior Notes due November 1, 2034) | |
4.2
|
Supplemental Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2004, filed with respect to the issuance of the companys 6.125% Senior Notes due November 1, 2034) | |
4.3
|
Second Supplemental Indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, filed with respect to the completion of the companys exchange offer and rescission offer for its 6.90% senior debentures due 2028) | |
4.4
|
Form of 6.125% Exchange Note Due 2034 (included in Exhibit 4.2) | |
4.5
|
Form of 6.92% Debentures Due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.3) | |
4.6
|
Indenture with the First National Bank of Chicago (subsequently assigned to The Bank of New York Trust Company) (incorporated by reference to the companys registration statement on Form S-3 effective May 22, 1998 (File No. 333-51677)) | |
4.7
|
Form of 6.90% Debentures Due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.6) | |
10.1
|
Agreement with Messer Construction (incorporated by reference to the companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 11, 2005) | |
10.2
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 21, 2005) | |
10.3
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan No. VI (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 1, 1999) (File No. 000-04604) | |
10.4
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan No. VII (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 8, 2002) (File No. 000-04604) | |
10.5
|
Standard Form of Nonqualified and Incentive Option Agreements for Stock Option Plan No. VI (incorporated by reference to the companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 11, 2005) | |
10.6
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2007) | |
10.7
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2007) |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
47 |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
10.8
|
Standard Form of Combined Incentive/Nonqualified Stock Option for Stock Option Plan VI (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2005) | |
10.9
|
364-Day Credit Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation and CFC Investment Company, as Borrowers, and Fifth Third Bank, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2005) | |
10.10
|
Director and Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary (incorporated by reference to the companys Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2007) | |
10.11
|
Executive Compensation Arrangements November 2007 (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2007) | |
10.12
|
Executive Compensation Arrangements November 2006 (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 24, 2006) | |
10.13
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation and CFC investment Company, as Borrower, and Fifth Third Bank, as lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 2006) | |
10.14
|
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006) | |
10.15
|
Standard Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for Stock Option Plan VII (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006) | |
10.16
|
Standard Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Stock Option Plan VII (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006) | |
10.17
|
Standard Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006) | |
10.18
|
Standard Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2006) | |
10.19
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for John J. Schiff, Jr., dated January 31, 2007(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007) | |
10.20
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for James E. Benoski, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007) | |
10.21
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Jacob F. Scherer, Jr., dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007) | |
10.22
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007) | |
10.23
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Thomas A. Joseph, dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007) | |
10.24
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (service-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2007, as amended) | |
10.25
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for use under the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (performance-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2007) | |
10.26
|
Form of Incentive Compensation Agreement for the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (performance-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2007) | |
10.27
|
Credit Agreement by and among Cincinnati Financial Corporation, CFC Investment Company, The Huntington National Bank and LaSalle Bank National Association, among others, dated July 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2007) |
48 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
10.28
|
Second Amended and Restated Discretionary Line of Credit Note with PNC Bank, National Association dated July 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007) as renewed pursuant to the Offer and Acceptance of terms to renew $75 million unsecured line of credit with PNC Bank, N.A., effective June 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 9, 2008) | |
10.29
|
Secondary Block Trade Agreement between The Cincinnati Insurance Company and UBS Securities LLC, dated October 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.30
|
Purchase Agreement (Tranche 1 of 4) between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and UBS AG, London Branch, acting through UBS Securities LLC as agent, dated October 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.31
|
Purchase Agreement (Tranche 2 of 4) between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and UBS AG, London Branch, acting through UBS Securities LLC as agent, dated October 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.32
|
Purchase Agreement (Tranche 3 of 4) between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and UBS AG, London Branch, acting through UBS Securities LLC as agent, dated October 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.33
|
Purchase Agreement (Tranche 4 of 4) between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and UBS AG, London Branch, acting through UBS Securities LLC as agent, dated October 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.34
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and the E. Perry Webb Marital Trust, dated September 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 filed with the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007) | |
10.35
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for John J. Schiff, Jr. dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.36
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for James E. Benoski dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.37
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Jacob F. Scherer, Jr. dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.38
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Kenneth W. Stecher dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.39
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Thomas A. Joseph dated February 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.40
|
Form of Performance based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Compensation Plan (performance-based) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2008) | |
10.41
|
Unwritten arrangement with Lehman Brothers Inc. to sell 35,000,000 shares of Fifth Third stock held by the Cincinnati Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to the further description of the arrangement set forth on the companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 25, 2008) | |
11
|
Statement re: Computation of per share earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, contained in Exhibit 11 of this report | |
31A
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Executive Officer | |
31B
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Financial Officer | |
32
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
49 |
/s/ Eric N. Mathews
|
||
Eric N. Mathews, CPCU, AIAF |
||
Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer |
||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
50 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |