SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
o |
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
OR | |
|
|
x |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
OR | |
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to
OR | |
|
|
o |
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commission file number: 1-13240
EMPRESA NACIONAL DE ELECTRICIDAD S.A. |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
EMPRESA NACIONAL DE ELECTRICIDAD S.A. |
(Translation of Registrants name into English) |
|
CHILE |
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
Santa Rosa 76, Santiago, Chile Telephone No. (562) 630-9847 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
Eduardo Escaffi, phone: (56-2) 630-9847, fax: (56-2) 635-4980, eej@endesa.cl, Santa Rosa 76, Piso 15, Santiago, Chile |
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
American Depositary Shares |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Common Stock, no par value * |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
*Listed, not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
$ 400,000,000 |
|
8.350% |
|
Notes due 2013 |
$ 200,000,000 |
|
8.625% |
|
Notes due 2015 |
$ 205,881,000 |
|
7.875% |
|
Notes due 2027 |
$ 71,000,000 |
|
7.325% |
|
Notes due 2037 |
$ 40,416,000 |
|
8.125% |
|
Notes due 2097 |
(Title of Class) |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Shares of Common Stock: |
8,201,754,580 |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
x Yes o No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP o |
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued |
|
Other o |
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
o Item 17 x Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes x No
Endesa Chiles Simplified Organizational Structure (1)
As of December 31, 2010
(1) |
Only principal operating subsidiaries are presented here. The percentage listed for each of our subsidiaries represents Endesa Chiles economic interest in such subsidiary. |
|
Page | |
|
| |
4 | ||
8 | ||
8 | ||
9 | ||
9 | ||
9 | ||
11 | ||
11 | ||
11 | ||
11 | ||
21 | ||
71 | ||
72 | ||
94 | ||
105 | ||
106 | ||
108 | ||
110 | ||
124 | ||
128 | ||
|
129 | |
129 | ||
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
129 | |
129 | ||
130 | ||
130 | ||
130 | ||
131 | ||
132 | ||
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Persons |
132 | |
132 | ||
132 | ||
|
133 | |
133 | ||
133 | ||
133 |
Acciona |
|
ACCIONA, S.A. |
|
Spanish construction holding company. Together with Enel, Acciona held a controlling interest in Endesa Spain until June 25, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
AFP |
|
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones |
|
A legal entity that manages a Chilean pension fund. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ampla |
|
Ampla Energía e Serviços S.A. |
|
Brazilian distribution company operating in Rio de Janeiro, owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANEEL |
|
Agéncia Nacional de Energia Elétrica |
|
Brazilian governmental agency for electric energy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Betania |
|
Central Hidroeléctrica de Betania S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombian subsidiary, which merged with Emgesa, another Endesa Chile subsidiary, in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cachoeira Dourada |
|
Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A. |
|
Brazilian generation company owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
CAMMESA |
|
Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. |
|
Argentine autonomous entity in charge of the operation of the Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista (Wholesale Electricity Market), or MEM. CAMMESAs stockholders are generation, transmission and distribution companies, large users and the Secretariat of Energy. |
|
|
|
|
|
CDEC |
|
Centro de Despacho Económico de Carga |
|
Autonomous entity in two Chilean electric systems in charge of coordinating the efficient operation and dispatch of generation units to satisfy demand. |
|
|
|
|
|
Celta |
|
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |
|
Chilean generation subsidiary of Endesa Chile that operates in the SING with thermal plants. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemsa |
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A |
|
Energy trading company with operations in Argentina, a subsidiary of Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chilectra |
|
Chilectra S.A. |
|
Chilean electricity distribution company operating in the Santiago metropolitan area and owned by our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
CIEN |
|
Companhia de Interconexão Energética S.A. |
|
Brazilian transmission company, wholly-owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
CNE |
|
Comisión Nacional de Energía |
|
Chilean National Energy Commission, governmental entity with responsibilities under the Chilean regulatory framework. |
Codensa |
|
Codensa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombian distribution company controlled by our parent company, Enersis, that operates mainly in Bogotá. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coelce |
|
Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A. |
|
Brazilian distribution company operating in the state of Ceará. Coelce is controlled by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
CREG |
|
Comisión de Regulación de Energía y Gas |
|
Colombian Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Gas. |
|
|
|
|
|
CTM |
|
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A. |
|
Endesa Brasils transmission subsidiary with operations in Argentina. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edegel |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peruvian generation company, a subsidiary of Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edelnor |
|
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |
|
Peruvian distribution company with a concession area in the northern part of Lima, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edesur |
|
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. |
|
Argentine distribution company with a concession area in the south of the Buenos Aires greater metropolitan area, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
El Chocón |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentine generation company, a subsidiary of Endesa Chile, with two hydroelectric plants, El Chocón and Arroyito, both located in the Limay River. |
|
|
|
|
|
Emgesa |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombian generation company controlled by Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Brasil |
|
Endesa Brasil, S.A. |
|
Brazilian holding company, subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Our company, a publicly held limited liability stock company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Chile, with operations in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru and an equity interest in Brazil, and 13,864 MW of consolidated installed capacity. Registrant of this report. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentine generation company controlled by Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Eco |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
Chilean electricity company, owner of Central Eólica Canela S.A. and Ojos de Agua mini hydro plant. Endesa Eco is an Endesa Chile subsidiary. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Fortaleza |
|
Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A. |
|
Operates a combined cycle generating plant, located in the state of Ceará. Endesa Fortaleza is wholly owned by Endesa Brasil, a subsidiary of our parent company, Enersis. |
Endesa Latinoamérica |
|
Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. |
|
Formerly Endesa Internacional S.A.U., a subsidiary of Endesa Spain and the direct controller of our parent company, Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Spain |
|
ENDESA, S.A. |
|
A Spanish electricity generation and distribution company with a 60.6% beneficial interest in Enersis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Enel |
|
Enel S.p.A. |
|
Italian power company, with a 92.1% controlling ownership of Endesa Spain. |
|
|
|
|
|
Enersis |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Our Chilean parent company, with a 60.0% controlling stake in Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
ENRE |
|
Ente Nacional Regulatorio de la Energía |
|
Argentine national regulatory authority for the energy sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
Etevensa |
|
Empresa de Generación Termoeléctrica Ventanilla S.A. |
|
Peruvian generation company that merged with Edegel in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
FONINVEMEM |
|
Fondo Para Inversiones Necesarias Que Permitan Incrementar La Oferta De Energía Eléctrica En El Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista |
|
Argentine fund created to increase electricity supply in the MEM. |
|
|
|
|
|
GasAtacama |
|
GasAtacama S.A. |
|
Company involved in gas transportation and electricity generation in the north of Chile that is 50% owned by Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gener |
|
Aes Gener S.A. |
|
Chilean generation company that competes with the Company in Chile, Argentina, and Colombia. |
|
|
|
|
|
GNLQ |
|
GNL Quintero S.A. |
|
Company created to develop, build, finance, own and operate a LNG regasification facility at Quintero Bay (Chile), in which LNG is unloaded, stored and regasified. |
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS |
|
International Financial Reporting Standards |
|
Accounting standards adopted by the Company on January 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
LNG |
|
Liquefied Natural Gas. |
|
Liquefied natural gas. |
|
|
|
|
|
MEM |
|
Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista |
|
Wholesale Electricity Market in Argentina. |
|
|
|
|
|
MME |
|
Ministério de Minas e Energia |
|
Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy. |
|
|
|
|
|
NCRE |
|
Non Conventional Renewable Energy |
|
Energy sources which are continuously replenished by natural processes, such as wind, biomass, mini-hydro, geothermal, wave or tidal energy. |
NIS |
|
Sistema Interconectado Nacional |
|
National interconnected electric system. There are such systems in Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Colombia. |
|
|
|
|
|
ONS |
|
Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico |
|
Electric System National Operator. Brazilian non-profit private entity responsible for the planning and coordination of operations in interconnected systems. |
|
|
|
|
|
Osinergmin |
|
Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería |
|
Energy and Mining Investment Supervisor Authority, the Peruvian regulatory electricity authority. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pangue |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
Chilean electricity company, owner of the Pangue power station. Pangue is an Endesa Chile subsidiary. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pehuenche |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. |
|
Chilean electricity company, owner of three power stations in the Maule River basin. Pehuenche is an Endesa Chile subsidiary. |
|
|
|
|
|
San Isidro |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
Chilean electricity company, owner of a thermal power station. San Isidro is wholly-owned by Endesa Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEF |
|
Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustible |
|
Chilean Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels, a governmental entity in charge of supervising the Chilean electricity industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEIN |
|
Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional |
|
Peruvian interconnected electric system. |
|
|
|
|
|
SIC |
|
Sistema Interconectado Central |
|
Chilean central interconnected electric system covering all of Chile except the north and the extreme south. |
|
|
|
|
|
SING |
|
Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande |
|
Electric interconnected system operating in northern Chile. |
|
|
|
|
|
SVS |
|
Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros |
|
Chilean authority in charge of supervising public companies, securities and the insurance business. |
|
|
|
|
|
UF |
|
Unidad de Fomento |
|
Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
UTA |
|
Unidad Tributaria Anual |
|
Chilean annual tax unit. One UTA equals 12 UTM. |
|
|
|
|
|
UTM |
|
Unidad Tributaria Mensual |
|
Chilean monthly tax unit used to define fines, among other purposes, which is inflation indexed. |
|
|
|
|
|
VAD |
|
Valor Agregado de Distribución |
|
Value added from distribution of electricity. |
|
|
|
|
|
VNR |
|
Valor Nuevo de Reemplazo |
|
The net replacement value of electricity assets. |
As used in this report on Form 20-F, first person personal pronouns such as we, us or our refer to Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa Chile or the Company) and our consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Unless otherwise noted, our interest in our principal subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities and associates is expressed in terms of our economic interest as of December 31, 2010.
We are a Chilean company engaged directly and through our subsidiaries and jointly-contolled entities in the electricity generation business in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru. We also have unconsolidated equity investments in companies engaged primarily in the electricity generation, transmission and distribution business in Brazil. As of the date of this report, our direct controlling entity, Enersis S.A. (Enersis), owns a 60.0% stake in our company. ENDESA, S.A. (Endesa Spain), a Spanish electricity generation and distribution company, owns 60.6% of Enersis. Enel S.p.A. (Enel), an Italian generation and distribution company, owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain through a wholly-owned subsidiary.
In this report on Form 20-F, unless otherwise specified, references to dollars, $, are to dollars of the United States of America; references to pesos or Ch$ are to Chilean pesos, the legal currency of Chile; references to Ar$ or Argentine pesos are to the legal currency of Argentina; references to R$, or reais are to Brazilian reals, the legal currency of Brazil; references to soles are to Peruvian Nuevo Sol, the legal currency of Peru; references to CPs or Colombian pesos are to the legal currency of Colombia; references to or Euros are to the legal currency of the European Union; and references to UF are to Unidades de Fomento.
The Unidad de Fomento is a Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit. The UF rate is set daily in advance based on changes in the previous months inflation rate. As of December 31, 2010, UF 1 was equivalent to Ch$ 21,455.55. The dollar equivalent of UF 1 was $ 45.84 at December 31, 2010, using the Observed Exchange Rate reported by the Banco Central de Chile (the Chilean Central Bank, or the Central Bank) as of December 31, 2010 of Ch$ 468.01 per $ 1.00. As of April 30, 2011, UF 1 was equivalent to Ch$ 21,711.55. The dollar equivalent of UF 1 was $ 47.19 at April 30, 2011, using the Observed Exchange Rate reported by the Central Bank as of April 30, 2011, of Ch$ 460.09 per $ 1.00.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements and, unless otherwise indicated, other financial information concerning Endesa Chile included in this report are presented in pesos. Until the year ended December 31, 2008, Endesa Chile prepared its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Chile (Chilean GAAP). Since January 1, 2009, Endesa Chile has prepared its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB).
The subsidiaries are consolidated and all their assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows are included in the consolidated financial statements after making the adjustments and eliminations related to intra-Group transactions.
Jointly-controlled entities, which are those that do not have a controlling shareholder but are governed by a joint management agreement, are consolidated by the proportional integration method. Endesa Chile recognizes, line by line, its share of the assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows of such entities, subject to accounting eliminations.
Investments in associates in which the Company has significant influence are recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements under the equity method.
For detailed information regarding subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and associates see Appendix No. 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the convenience of the reader, this report contains translations of certain peso amounts into dollars at specified rates. Unless otherwise indicated, the dollar equivalent for information in pesos is based on the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2010, as defined in Item 3. Key InformationA. Selected Financial DataExchange Rates. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for pesos. No representation is made that the peso or dollar amounts shown in this report could have been or could be converted into dollars or pesos, as the case may be, at such rate or at any other rate. See Item 3. Key InformationA. Selected Financial DataExchange Rates.
References to GW and GWh are to gigawatt and gigawatt hours, respectively; references to MW and MWh are to megawatts and megawatt hours, respectively; references to kW and kWh are to kilowatts and kilowatt hours, respectively; references to kV are to kilovolts, and references to MVA are to megavolt amperes. Unless otherwise indicated, statistics provided in this report with respect to the installed capacity of electricity generation facilities are expressed in MW. One TW = 1,000 GW, one GW = 1,000 MW, and one MW = 1,000 kW.
Statistics relating to aggregate annual electricity production are expressed in GWh and based on a year of 8,760 hours, except for leap years (such as 2008), which are based on 8,784 hours. Statistics relating to installed capacity and production of the electricity industry do not include electricity of self-generators. Statistics relating to our production do not include electricity consumed by us by our own generation units.
Energy losses experienced by generation companies during transmission are calculated by subtracting the number of GWh of energy sold from the number of GWh of energy generated (excluding own energy consumption and losses on the part of the power plant), within a given period. Losses are expressed as a percentage of total energy generated.
Calculation of Economic Interest
References are made in this report to the economic interest of Endesa Chile in its related companies. In circumstances where we do not directly own an interest in a related company, our economic interest in such ultimate related company is calculated by multiplying the percentage economic interest in a directly held related company by the percentage of economic interest of any entity in the ownership chain of such related company. For example, if we own 60% of a directly held subsidiary and that subsidiary owns 40% of an associate, our economic interest in such associate would be 60% times 40%, or 24%.
This report contains statements that are or may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements appear throughout this report and include statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations, including, but not limited to, any statements concerning:
· our capital investment program;
· trends affecting our financial condition or results from operations;
· our dividend policy;
· the future impact of competition and regulation;
· political and economic conditions in the countries in which we or our related companies operate or may operate in the future;
· any statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words believes, expects, predicts, anticipates, intends, estimates, should, may or similar expressions; and
· other statements contained or incorporated by reference in this report regarding matters that are not historical facts.
Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to:
· changes in the regulatory framework of the electricity industry in one or more of the countries in which we operate;
· our ability to implement proposed capital expenditures, including our ability to arrange financing where required;
· the nature and extent of future competition in our principal markets;
· political, economic and demographic developments in the emerging market countries of South America where we conduct our business; and
· the factors discussed below under Risk Factors.
You should not place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date that they were made. Our independent public accountants have not examined or compiled the forward-looking statements and, accordingly, do not provide any assurance with respect to such statements. You should consider these cautionary statements together with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we may issue in the future. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
For all these forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
A. Selected Financial Data.
The following summary of consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. Our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the IASB. For further detail on the adoption of IFRS, please see Introduction Financial Information. The financial data as of and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2010 in the table below are presented in pesos.
Amounts are expressed in millions except for ratios, operating data, shares and ADS (American Depositary Shares) data. For the convenience of the reader, all data presented in dollars in the following summary, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, are translated at the Observed Exchange Rate of Ch$ 468.01 per $ 1.00. No representation is made that the peso or dollar amounts shown in this report could have been or could be converted into dollars or pesos, at such rate or any other rate. For more information concerning historical exchange rates, see Exchange Rates below.
The following table sets forth the selected consolidated financial data of Endesa Chile in accordance with IFRS for the periods indicated:
|
|
As of or for the year ended December 31, |
| ||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
|
Ch$ Million |
|
Million of $ |
| ||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2,536,388 |
|
2,418,919 |
|
2,435,382 |
|
5,204 |
|
Operating Costs |
|
(1,662,224 |
) |
(1,401,988 |
) |
(1,544,658 |
) |
(3,300 |
) |
Operating Income |
|
874,164 |
|
1,016,931 |
|
890,724 |
|
1,904 |
|
Financial Income (Cost), Net |
|
(223,218 |
) |
(196,111 |
) |
(129,800 |
) |
(277 |
) |
Total gain (loss) on sale of non-current assets not held for sale |
|
(708 |
) |
65 |
|
1,621 |
|
3 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
117,471 |
|
123,683 |
|
102,030 |
|
217 |
|
Net Income Before Tax |
|
767,709 |
|
944,568 |
|
864,575 |
|
1,847 |
|
Income tax |
|
(210,178 |
) |
(172,468 |
) |
(179,964 |
) |
(385 |
) |
Net Income |
|
557,531 |
|
772,100 |
|
684,611 |
|
1,462 |
|
Net income attributable to: Owners of parent |
|
433,177 |
|
627,053 |
|
533,556 |
|
1,140 |
|
Net income attributable to: Non-controlling interests |
|
124,354 |
|
145,047 |
|
151,055 |
|
322 |
|
Net Income (loss) from continuing operations per Share (Ch$ / $) |
|
52.82 |
|
76.45 |
|
65.05 |
|
0.1391 |
|
Net Income (loss) from continuing operations per ADS (Ch$ / $) |
|
1,584.60 |
|
2,293.50 |
|
1,953.00 |
|
4.1698 |
|
Net Income (loss) per Share (Ch$ / $) |
|
52.82 |
|
76.45 |
|
65.05 |
|
0.1391 |
|
Net Income (loss) per ADS (Ch$ / $) |
|
1,584.60 |
|
2,293.50 |
|
1,953.00 |
|
4.1698 |
|
Cash Dividends per share (Ch$ / $) |
|
16.19 |
|
25.25 |
|
17.53 |
|
0.0375 |
|
Cash Dividends per ADS (Ch$ / $) |
|
485.70 |
|
757.50 |
|
525.90 |
|
1.124 |
|
Number of shares of common stock (millions) |
|
8,202 |
|
8,202 |
|
8,202 |
|
8,202 |
|
Number of ADS (millions) |
|
14 |
|
13 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
6,678,905 |
|
6,169,353 |
|
6,034,872 |
|
12,895 |
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
2,621,307 |
|
2,233,249 |
|
1,969,055 |
|
4,207 |
|
Equity Attributable to Owners of parent |
|
1,598,730 |
|
2,069,086 |
|
2,376,487 |
|
5,078 |
|
Equity Attributable to Non-controlling interests |
|
1,103,224 |
|
885,916 |
|
728,340 |
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Consolidated Financial Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures Paid (2) |
|
257,606 |
|
316,002 |
|
258,790 |
|
553 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses |
|
186,605 |
|
240,142 |
|
179,714 |
|
382 |
|
(1) |
Solely for the convenience of the reader, peso amounts have been translated into dollars at the exchange rate of Ch$ 468.01 per dollar, the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2010. |
(2) |
Capex figures represent effective payments for each year. |
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Operating Data by Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed capacity in Chile (MW) |
|
4,477 |
|
4,779 |
|
5,283 |
|
5.650 |
|
5,611 |
|
Installed capacity in Argentina (MW) |
|
3,639 |
|
3,644 |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
Installed capacity in Colombia (MW) |
|
2,779 |
|
2,829 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,914 |
|
Installed capacity in Peru (MW) |
|
1,426 |
|
1,468 |
|
1,467 |
|
1,667 |
|
1,668 |
|
Production in Chile (GWh)(1) |
|
19,973 |
|
18,773 |
|
21,267 |
|
22,239 |
|
20,914 |
|
Production in Argentina (GWh)(1) |
|
13,750 |
|
12,117 |
|
10,480 |
|
11,955 |
|
10,940 |
|
Production in Colombia (GWh)(1) |
|
12,564 |
|
11,942 |
|
12,905 |
|
12,674 |
|
11,283 |
|
Production in Peru (GWh)(1) |
|
6,662 |
|
7,654 |
|
8,102 |
|
8,163 |
|
8,466 |
|
(1) Energy production is defined as total generation minus energy consumption and technical losses within our own power plants.
Exchange Rates
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and the dollar will affect the dollar equivalent of the peso price of our shares of common stock, without par value (the Shares or the Common Stock), on the Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago (the Santiago Stock Exchange), the Bolsa Electrónica de Chile (the Chilean Electronic Exchange) and the Bolsa de Corredores de Valparaíso (the Valparaíso Stock Exchange) (collectively, the Chilean Exchanges). These exchange rate fluctuations will likely affect the price of the Companys ADS and the conversion of cash dividends relating to the Shares represented by ADS from pesos to dollars. In addition, to the extent that significant financial liabilities of the Company are denominated in foreign currencies, exchange rate fluctuations may have a significant impact on earnings.
The Ley Orgánica del Banco Central de Chile 18,840 (the Central Bank Act), provides that the Central Bank may require that certain purchases and sales of foreign currency be carried out in the Mercado Cambiario Formal (the Formal Exchange Market), a market comprised of banks and other entities explicitly authorized by the Central Bank. Purchases and sales of foreign currency, which can take place outside the Formal Exchange Market, can be carried out in the Mercado Cambiario Informal (the Informal Exchange Market), which is a recognized currency market in Chile. Free market forces drive both the Formal and Informal Exchange Markets. Foreign currency for payments and distributions with respect to the ADS may be purchased in either the Formal or the Informal Exchange Market, but such payments and distributions must be remitted through the Formal Exchange Market. The Central Bank publishes the dólar observado (the Observed Exchange Rate) daily, and it is computed by taking the weighted average of the previous business days transactions in the Formal Exchange Market.
Since 1993, the Observed Exchange Rate and the Informal Exchange Rate have typically been within less than 1% of each other. The Informal Exchange Rate means the average rate at which transactions are made in the Informal Exchange Market. On December 31, 2010, the Informal Exchange Rate was Ch$ 468.00, or virtually the same as the published Observed Exchange Rate of Ch$ 468.01 per $ 1.00. On April 30, 2011, the informal exchange rate was Ch$ 460.35 per $ 1.00, 0.1% higher than the Observed Exchange Rate corresponding to such date of Ch$ 460.09 per $ 1.00. Unless otherwise indicated, amounts translated to dollars were calculated based on the exchange rates prevailing as of December 31, 2010.
The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the Observed Exchange Rate reported by the Central Bank.
|
|
Monthly Observed Exchange Rate(1) |
| ||||||
Last six months |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Average(2) |
|
Period- |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November |
|
477.05 |
|
488.04 |
|
|
|
487.87 |
|
December |
|
468.01 |
|
485.34 |
|
|
|
468.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
466.05 |
|
499.03 |
|
|
|
484.14 |
|
February |
|
468.94 |
|
481.56 |
|
|
|
475.21 |
|
March |
|
472.74 |
|
485.37 |
|
|
|
479.46 |
|
April |
|
460.04 |
|
476.90 |
|
|
|
460.09 |
|
Source: Chilean Central Bank.
(1) Reflects pesos at historical values rather than in constant pesos.
(2) The average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the yearly period. This is not applicable to monthly data.
Calculation of the appreciation or devaluation of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar in any given period is made by determining the percent change between the reciprocals of the Chilean peso equivalent of $ 1.00 at the end of the preceding period and the end of the period for which the calculation is being made. For example, to calculate the appreciation of the Chilean peso in 2010, one determines the percent change between the reciprocal of Ch$ 507.10 (the value of one dollar as of December 31, 2009) and the reciprocal of Ch$ 468.01 (the value of one dollar as of December 31, 2010). In this example, the percentage change between 0.001971 (the reciprocal of 507.10) and 0.002136 (the reciprocal of 468.01) is 8.4%, which represents the appreciation of the Chilean peso against the dollar in 2010. A positive percentage change means that the Chilean peso appreciated against the dollar, while a negative percentage change means that the peso devaluated against the dollar.
The following table sets forth the period-end rates for U.S. dollars for the years ended December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2010 and through the date indicated in the table below, based on information published by the Chilean Central Bank.
Chilean Peso Equivalent of $1 |
|
Period |
|
Appreciation |
|
Year Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
532.39 |
|
(3.7 |
)% |
December 31, 2007 |
|
496.89 |
|
7.1 |
% |
December 31, 2008 |
|
636.45 |
|
(21.9 |
)% |
December 31, 2009 |
|
507.10 |
|
25.5 |
% |
December 31, 2010 |
|
468.01 |
|
8.4 |
% |
(1) Calculated based on the variation of period-end exchange rates.
Source: Chilean Central Bank.
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness.
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors.
A financial crisis in any region worldwide can have a significant impact in the countries in which we operate, and consequently, may adversely affect our operations, as well as our liquidity.
The five countries in which we operate are vulnerable to external shocks, which could cause significant economic difficulties and affect their growth. In case any of these economies experience a lower economic growth or a recession, it is likely that our customers will demand less electricity, which could affect our results of operations and financial condition adversely. Furthermore, some of our customers may experience difficulties in paying their electricity bills, and an increase in uncollectible accounts would also affect our results adversely.
In addition, a financial crisis and its disruptive effect on the financial industry can have an adverse impact on our ability to obtain new bank loans under normal terms and conditions. Our ability to tap the capital markets in the five countries where we operate, as well as the international capital markets for other sources of liquidity, may also be diminished, or such financing may be available only at higher interest levels. Reduced liquidity could, in turn, affect our capital expenditures, our long-term investments and acquisitions, our growth prospects, and our dividend payout policy.
South American economic fluctuations are likely to affect our results from operations and financial condition, as well as the value of our securities.
All of our operations are located in five South American countries. Accordingly, our consolidated revenues are sensitive to the performance of South American economies as a whole. If local, regional or worldwide economic trends adversely affect the economy of any of the five countries in which we have investments or operations, our financial condition and results from operations could be adversely affected. Moreover, we have investments in relatively risky countries such as Argentina. Generation and distribution of cash from subsidiaries located in this country have proven to be volatile.
A substantial portion of our assets and operations are located in Chile, making our financial condition and results of operations particularly dependent on the performance of the Chilean economy. In 2010, the Chilean GDP increased by 5.2% compared to a 1.7% decrease in 2009. The latest estimate from the Chilean Central Bank forecast growth for 2011, is in the 5.5% - 6.5% range. However, such growth may not be achieved and the growth trend may not be sustainable in the future. Future developments in the Chilean economy may impair our ability to proceed with our strategic plans and adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, the South American financial and securities markets are, to varying degrees, influenced by economic and market conditions in other countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investor reaction to developments in one country may have a significant contagion effect on the securities of issuers in other countries, including Chile. Chilean financial and securities markets may be adversely affected by events in other countries and such effects may affect the value of our securities.
Certain South American economies have been characterized by frequent and occasionally drastic intervention by governmental authorities, which may adversely affect our business.
Governmental authorities have changed monetary, credit, tariff and other policies to influence the course of the economies of Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. To a lesser extent, the Chilean government has also exercised and continues to exercise a substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector, which may result in changes to economic or other policies. These governmental actions, intended to control inflation and affect other policies, have often involved wage, price and tariff rate controls as well as other interventionist measures, which in Argentina included freezing bank accounts and imposing capital restrictions in 2001, the nationalization of the private sector pension funds in 2008, and the use of Central Bank reserves of the Argentine Treasury in order to pay down indebtedness maturing in 2010. Changes in the policies of these governmental authorities with respect to tariff rates, exchange controls, regulations and taxation could adversely affect our business and financial results, reducing our profitability, as could inflation, devaluation, social instability and other political, economic or diplomatic developments, including the response by governments in the region to these circumstances.
Our electricity business is subject to risks arising from natural disasters, catastrophic accidents and acts of terrorism, which could adversely affect our operations, earnings and cash flow.
Our primary facilities include power plants and their associated transmission lines, pipelines, LNG terminals and re-gasification plants, storage and chartered LNG tankers. Our facilities may be damaged by earthquakes, flooding, fires, other catastrophic disasters arising from natural or accidental human causes, as well as acts of terrorism. We could experience severe business disruptions, significant decreases in revenues based on lower demand arising from catastrophic events, or significant additional costs to us not otherwise covered by business interruption insurance. There may be an important time lag between a major accident or catastrophic event and the final reimbursement from our insurance policies, which typically carry non-recoverable deductible amounts, and in any event are subject to caps per event.
We are subject to refinancing risk and to debt covenants that could affect our liquidity.
As of December 31, 2010, our debt in financial terms was $ 3,775 million while, for accounting purposes, it totaled $ 3,828 million. These amounts differ since financial debt, unlike accounting debt, does not include accrued interest.
Our financial debt had the following maturity timetable:
· $ 521 million in 2011;
· $ 336 million in 2012;
· $ 1,222 million in the 2013-2015 period; and
· $ 1,696 million thereafter.
Set forth below is a breakdown by country of financial debt maturing in 2011:
· $ 61 million - Chile;
· $ 148 million - Argentina;
· $ 232 million - Colombia; and
· $ 80 million - Peru.
Our debt agreements are subject to certain debt to EBITDA and debt-to-equity financial covenant ratios, among others. They also contain common affirmative and negative covenants, as well as events of default, and in some cases, mandatory prepayment events.
As is customary for certain credit and capital market debt facilities, a significant portion of Endesa Chiles financial indebtedness is subject to cross default provisions, with different definitions, criteria, materiality thresholds, and applicability as to the subsidiaries that could give rise to a cross default.
In the event that any of our cross default provisions is triggered and our existing creditors demand immediate repayment, a portion of our indebtedness could become due and payable.
We may be unable to refinance our indebtedness or obtain such refinancing on terms acceptable to us. In the absence of such refinancing, we could be forced to dispose of assets in order to make up for any shortfall in the payments due on our indebtedness under circumstances that might not be favorable to obtaining the best price for such assets. Furthermore, assets may not be sold quickly enough or for amounts sufficient to enable us to make such payments.
As of the date of this report, Argentina continues to be the country with the highest refinancing risk. As of December 31, 2010, the third-party financial debt of our Argentine subsidiaries amounted to $ 298.4 million. As a matter of policy for all of our Argentine subsidiaries as long as fundamental issues concerning the electricity sector remain unresolved, we are rolling over our Argentine outstanding debt. If our creditors do not continue to accept rolling over debt principal when it becomes due and we are unable to refinance such obligations, we may default on such indebtedness. For more information on covenants, cross default and relevant provisions of these credit facilities, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Since our generation business depends heavily on hydrological conditions, drought conditions may hurt our profitability.
Approximately 58% of our consolidated installed generation capacity in 2010 was hydroelectric. Accordingly, extreme hydrological conditions may affect our business, and may have an adverse effect on our results.
During periods of drought, thermal plants, such as ours that use natural gas, fuel oil or coal as a fuel, are dispatched more frequently. Operating costs of thermal plants might be considerably higher than those of hydroelectric plants. Our operating expenses increase during these periods, and depending on our commercial obligations, we may have to buy electricity from the spot market in order to comply with our contractual supply obligations. The cost of these electricity purchases may exceed the price at which we sell contracted electricity, thus producing losses from those contracts.
Governmental regulations may impose additional operating costs which may reduce our profits.
We are subject to extensive regulation of tariffs and other aspects of our business in the countries in which we operate, and these regulations may adversely affect our profitability. For example, the Chilean government can impose electricity rationing during drought conditions or prolonged failures in power facilities. On February 9, 2011, the Ministry of Energy promulgated a rationing decree that will be in effect from February 17, 2011 to August 31, 2011. If, during rationing, we are unable to generate enough electricity to comply with our contractual obligations, we may be forced to buy electricity in the pool market at the spot price, since even a severe drought does not constitute a force majeure event. The spot price may be significantly higher than our costs to generate the electricity and can be as high as the cost of failure set by the National Energy Commission, or the CNE. This cost of failure, which is updated semiannually by the CNE, is a measurement of how much final users would pay for one extra MWh under rationing conditions. If we are unable to buy enough electricity in the pool market to comply with all of our contractual obligations, then we would have to compensate our regulated customers for the electricity we failed to provide at the rationed price. If material rationing policies are imposed by regulatory authorities in Chile, our business, financial condition and results from operations may be affected adversely in a material way.
Similarly, if material rationing policies are imposed by the local regulatory authority in the other countries in which we operate, as a result of adverse hydrological conditions, our business, financial condition and results from operations may be affected adversely in a material way. Rationing periods may occur in the future, and consequently our generation subsidiaries may be required to pay regulatory penalties if such subsidiaries fail to provide adequate service under such conditions.
In addition, changes in the regulatory framework, including changes that if adopted would significantly affect our operations, are often submitted to the legislators and administrative authorities in the countries in which we operate and, if approved, could have a material adverse impact on our business. For instance, in 2005 there was a change in the water rights law in Chile that requires us to pay for unused water rights.
Regulatory authorities may impose fines on our subsidiaries.
Our electricity businesses may be subject to regulatory fines for any breach of current regulations, including energy supply failure, in the five countries in which we operate. In Chile, such fines may range from 1 Unidad Tributaria Mensual (UTM), or $ 80, to 10,000 Unidades Tributarias Anuales (UTA), or $ 9.6 million, in each case using the UTM, UTA and foreign exchange rate as of December 31, 2010. In Peru, fines can reach a maximum of 1,300 Unidad Impositiva Tributaria (UIT) or $ 1.7 million as of December 31, 2010; in Colombia, fines may range from $ 2,900 to $ 0.6 million; in Argentina there is no maximum limit for the fines and in Brazil fines may range from $ 0.1 to $ 35.3 million.
Our electricity generation subsidiaries, supervised by their local regulatory entities, may be subject to these fines in cases where, in the opinion of the regulatory entity, operational failures that affect the regular energy supply to the system are the fault of the company; for instance, when the agents are not coordinated with the system operation. Also, our subsidiaries may be required to pay fines or to compensate customers if those subsidiaries are unable to deliver electricity to them even if such failure is due to forces outside of our control.
For example, in Chile in 2005, the Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustibles (Chilean Superintendence of Electricity and Fuels), or SEF, imposed fines of 1,260 UTA, or $ 1.1 million, on Endesa Chile due to a blackout that occurred in the Metropolitan Region in 2003. On February 17, 2009, the SEF imposed fines on Endesa Chile, Pehuenche and San Isidro for 200 UTA, 200 UTA and 100 UTA, respectively, or $ 0.4 million in total. In the case of our foreign subsidiaries, for example, in 2006 in Peru the Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema (Peruvian Economic Operating Committee of the Interconnected System), or COES-SINAC, ordered Edegel to pay approximately $ 1.3 million to other generating companies that were forced to compensate their clients due to an alleged failure of Edegel to comply with certain quality parameters.
We depend in part on payments from our subsidiaries, jointly-controlled entities and associates to meet our payment obligations.
In order to pay our obligations, we rely partly on cash from dividends, loans, interest payments, capital reductions and other distributions from our subsidiaries and equity affiliates, as well as cash from proceeds of the issuance of new securities. Our ability to pay our obligations will depend on the receipt of distributions from our subsidiaries. The ability of our subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends, interest payments, loans and other distributions to us is subject to legal constraints such as dividend restrictions, fiduciary duties, contractual limitations and foreign exchange controls that may be imposed in any of the countries where they operate.
Historically, we have been able to access the cash flows of our Chilean subsidiaries, but we have not been similarly able to access at all times the cash flows of our non-Chilean operating subsidiaries due to government regulations, strategic considerations, economic conditions and credit restrictions.
Our future results from operations outside Chile may continue to be subject to greater economic and political uncertainties than what we have experienced in Chile, thereby reducing the likelihood that we will be able to rely on cash flows from operations in those entities to repay our debt.
Dividend Limits and Other Legal Restrictions. Some of our non-Chilean subsidiaries are subject to legal reserve requirements and other restrictions on dividend payments. Also, other legal restrictions, such as foreign currency controls, may limit the ability of our non-Chilean subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends and make loan payments or other distributions to us. In addition, the ability of any of our subsidiaries which are not wholly-owned to distribute cash to us may be limited by the fiduciary duties of the directors of such subsidiaries to their minority shareholders. Furthermore, some of our subsidiaries may be forced by local authorities, according to applicable regulation, to diminish or eliminate dividend payments. As a consequence of such restrictions, our subsidiaries could, under certain circumstances, be prevented from distributing cash to us.
Contractual Constraints. Distribution restrictions included in some credit agreements of our subsidiaries Endesa Costanera and El Chocón, may prevent dividend distributions and other distributions to shareholders if they are not in compliance with certain financial ratios. Generally, companies are not allowed to make any kind of distribution in case of default on credit agreements.
Operating Results of Our Subsidiaries. The ability of our subsidiaries and equity affiliates to pay dividends or make loan payments or other distributions to us is limited by their operating results. To the extent that the cash requirements at any of our subsidiaries exceed available cash, such subsidiary will not be able to make cash available to us.
Foreign exchange risks may adversely affect our results, and the dollar value of dividends payable to ADS holders.
Most South American currencies in which we and our subsidiaries operate have been subject to large devaluations and appreciations against the dollar and may be subject to significant fluctuations in the future.
Historically, a significant portion of our consolidated indebtedness has been denominated in dollars and, although a substantial portion of our revenues are linked to dollars, we generally have been and will continue to be materially exposed to fluctuations of our local currencies against the dollar because of time lags and other limitations to peg our tariffs to the dollar.
Because of this exposure, the cash generated by our subsidiaries can decrease substantially when local currencies devalue against the dollar. Future volatility in the exchange rate of the currencies in which we receive revenues or incur expenditures, may affect our financial condition and results from operations. For more information on the risks associated with foreign exchange rates, see Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
As of December 31, 2010, using financial rather than accounting conventions, Endesa Chiles total consolidated financial debt was $ 3,775 million (net of currency hedging instruments). Of this amount $ 2,162 million, or 57.3%, was denominated in dollars and $ 452 million in pesos. In addition to the dollar and the peso, our foreign currency denominated consolidated indebtedness included the equivalent of:
· $ 113 million in Argentine pesos;
· $ 955 million in Colombian pesos; and
· $ 93 million in soles.
This totals an aggregate of $ 1,161 million in currencies other than dollars or pesos.
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010, our operating revenues amounted to $ 5,206 million (before consolidation adjustments) of which:
· $ 1,007 million, or 19.3%, was denominated in dollars; and
· $ 2,434 million, or 46.8%, was linked in some way to the dollar.
In the aggregate, 66.1% of our operating revenues (before consolidation adjustments) was either denominated in dollars or linked to dollars through some form of indexation, while 2.5% was in pesos.
Revenues, before consolidation adjustments, in other currencies for the year ended December 31, 2010, included the equivalent of:
· $ 753 million in Argentine pesos;
· $ 824 million in Colombian pesos; and
· $ 59 million in soles.
Although we generate revenues and incur debt in these same currencies, we believe that we are subject to risk in terms of our foreign exchange exposure to these four currencies. The most material case is that of Argentina, where most of our debt is denominated in dollars while our revenues are mostly in Argentine pesos.
Furthermore, trading of our common stock underlying ADS is conducted in pesos. Our depositary bank will receive cash distributions that we make with respect to the shares underlying the ADS in pesos. The depositary bank will convert such pesos to dollars at the then-prevailing exchange rate to make dividend and other distribution payments in respect of ADS. If the peso depreciates against the dollar, the value of the ADS and any dollar distributions ADS holders receive from the depositary bank will decrease.
We are involved in litigation proceedings.
We are currently involved in various litigation proceedings, which could result in unfavorable decisions or financial penalties against us, and we will continue to be subject to future litigation proceedings, which could have material adverse consequences to our business.
We are a party to a number of legal proceedings, some of which have been pending for several years. Some of these claims may be resolved against us. Our financial condition or results from operations could be adversely affected if certain material claims are resolved against us. See Note 20.2 of our audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The values of our subsidiaries long-term energy supply contracts are subject to fluctuations in the market prices of certain commodities.
We have economic exposure to fluctuations in the market prices of certain commodities as a result of the long-term energy sales contracts we have entered into. We and our subsidiaries have material obligations as selling parties under long-term fixed-price electricity sales contracts. Prices in these contracts are indexed according to different commodities, exchange rate, inflation and the market price of electricity. During 2010, we did not carry out transactions in commodity derivative instruments to manage our exposure to commodity price fluctuations. For further discussion, please refer to Item 11-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk-Commodity Price Risk.
Our controlling shareholders may have conflicts of interest relating to our business.
Enel beneficially owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain, which in turn owns 60.6% of Enersis share capital, and Enersis beneficially owns 60.0% of Endesa Chiles outstanding capital stock. Our controlling shareholders have the power to determine the outcome of most material matters that require shareholders votes, such as the election of the majority of our board members and, subject to contractual and legal restrictions, the distribution of dividends. Our controlling shareholders also can exercise influence over our operations and business strategy. Their interests may in some cases differ from those of our other shareholders. Enel and Endesa Spain conduct their business in South America through us as well as through entities in which we do not have an equity interest.
Environmental regulations in the countries in which we operate and other factors may cause delays or impede the development of new projects, as well as increase our costs of operations.
Our operating subsidiaries are also subject to environmental regulations which, among other things, require us to perform environmental impact studies for future projects and obtain permits from both local and national regulators. Approval of these environmental impact studies may take longer than originally planned, and also, may be withheld by governmental authorities. Also, local communities, ethnic or environmental activists may intervene during the approval process in order to prevent the projects development. They may also seek injunctive or other relief, with negative implications for us if they should succeed with their claims.
In addition to the environmental matters, there are other factors that may adversely affect our ability to build new facilities, including delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, shortages or increases in the price of equipment, materials or labor, strikes, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, accidents or other unforeseen events, and the inability to obtain financing at affordable rates.
In addition, delays or modifications to any proposed project and laws or regulations may change or be interpreted in a manner that could adversely affect our operations or our plans for companies in which we hold investments. See Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework.
The relative illiquidity and volatility of Chilean securities markets could adversely affect the price of our common stock and ADS.
Chilean securities markets are substantially smaller and less liquid than the major securities markets in the United States. In addition, Chilean securities markets may be affected materially by developments in other emerging markets. The low liquidity of the Chilean market may impair the ability of holders of ADS to sell shares of our common stock withdrawn from the ADS program into the Chilean market in the amount and at the price and time they wish to do so.
Lawsuits against us brought outside of Chile or complaints against us based on foreign legal concepts may be unsuccessful.
All of our assets are located outside of the United States. Almost all of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States and most of their assets are located outside the United States as well. If any shareholder were to bring a lawsuit against our directors, officers or experts in the United States, it may be difficult for them to effect service of legal process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce against them, in United States or Chilean courts, judgments obtained in United States courts based upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. In addition, there is doubt as to whether an action could be brought successfully in Chile on the basis of liability based solely upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws.
A. History and Development of the Company.
Incorporation and Contact Information of the Company
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa Chile) is a publicly held limited liability stock company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Chile on December 1, 1943. Since 1943, the Company has been registered in Santiago with the SVS under Registration No. 0114. The Company is commercially referred to as both Endesa and Endesa Chile.
The Companys contact information in Chile is:
Street Address: |
Santa Rosa 76, Santiago, Código Postal 8330099, Chile |
Telephone: |
(562) 630-9055 |
Fax: |
(562) 635-4980 |
Web site: |
www.endesa.cl |
The Companys authorized representative in the United States of America is Puglisi & Associates, whose contact information is:
Street Address: |
850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19711 |
Telephone: |
1 (302) 738-6680 |
Development of the Company
The Chilean government owned Endesa Chile from its incorporation in 1943 until we began a privatization process through a series of public offerings between 1987 and 1989.
In May 1992, Endesa Chile began its international expansion program with the following developments:
· we acquired a stake in Endesa Costanera in 1992 and later, in August 1993, we acquired a controlling equity interest in El Chocón, both in Argentina; in March 2007 we increased our equity interest in El Chocón from 47.4% to 65.4% and in Endesa Costanera from 64.3% to 69.8%.
· we acquired Edegel in Peru in October 1995; in June 2006, Edegel and Etevensa merged, after which Endesa Chiles equity interest in Edegel increased to 33.1%. In October 2009, we purchased an additional 29.4% of Edegel from Generalima, a Peruvian indirect subsidiary of Endesa Spain. With this transaction, we increased our economic interest in Edegel to 62.5%.
· we acquired Betania and Emgesa, both in Colombia, in December 1996 and in October 1997, respectively. In September 2007, these subsidiaries were merged into Betania, which then adopted the name of Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.; as of December 2010 Endesa Chiles equity interest in Emgesa was 26.9%. Due to a transfer of rights from another subsidiary of Endesa Spain, Endesa Chile controls and, therefore, consolidates Emgesa.
· we acquired Cachoeira Dourada in Brazil in September 1997, and in 1998 we and Endesa Spain invested in CIEN, which operates an international transmission line connecting Brazil and Argentina. Since October 2005, Cachoeira Dourada and CIEN have been subsidiaries of our affiliate, Endesa Brasil.
On March 26, 2007, Spanish company Acciona, S.A. (Acciona) and Italian company Enel, executed an agreement for the joint management of Spanish company, Endesa Spain. The latter, through its Spanish subsidiary Endesa Latinoamérica, holds 60.6% of the share capital of Enersis, which in turn holds 60% of the share capital of Endesa Chile.
On February 20, 2009, Acciona and Enel reached an agreement whereby Acciona would transfer directly and indirectly to Enel Energy Europe S.L.U., a wholly owned subsidiary of Enel, its 25.0% shareholding in Endesa Spain.
On June 25, 2009, the transaction was completed, making Enel the ultimate controller of Endesa Chile by virtue of its 92.1% shareholding in Endesa Spain. This transaction was reported to the Spanish National Securities Market Commission (CNMV in its Spanish acronym) as material information on the same date.
Enel is a publicly-traded company headquarted in Italy. primarily engaged in the energy sector, with presence in 40 countries over 4 continents, and has around 95,000 MW of net installed capacity. It provides service to more than 61 million clients through its electricity and gas businesses.
As of December 31, 2010 we had 13,846 MW of installed capacity, with 186 generation units in the five countries in which we operate, consolidated assets of Ch$ 6,035 billion and operating revenues of Ch$ 2,398 billion.
Investments, Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
We coordinate the overall financing strategy including terms and conditions of borrowings by, and intercompany advances to, our subsidiaries to optimize debt and liquidity management. Our operating subsidiaries independently plan capital expenditure financed by internally generated funds or direct financings. Additionally, by focusing on Endesa Chile as a whole and seeking to provide services across the group of companies, we aim to reduce the level of investment necessary at the individual subsidiary level in items such as procurement, telecommunication and information systems. Although we have considered how these investments will be financed as part of the Companys budget process, we have not committed to any particular financing structure, and investments will depend on the market conditions at the time the cash flows are needed.
Our investment plan is flexible enough so as to adapt to changing circumstances by giving different priorities to each project in accordance with profitability and strategic fit. Investment priorities are currently focused on developing the capacity plan in Chile and Colombia, to guarantee adequate levels of quality of supply and to manage environmental issues.
For the period between 2011 and 2015, we expect to make capital expenditures of Ch$ 1,310 billion in our controlled subsidiaries, of which Ch$ 687 billion relates to investments currently in progress (Bocamina II and El Quimbo). We also plan to invest Ch$ 533 billion in the maintenance of existing installed capacity and Ch$ 90 billion in the studies needed to develop other potential generation projects that are in different stages of maturity, including Los Cóndores, Neltume, Choshuenco, HidroAysén, Punta Alcalde and Piruquina in Chile and Curibamba in Perú. For further detail regarding these projects, please see Item 4. D. Property, Plants and Equipment. Projects under Development.
The table below sets forth the capital expenditures made in 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the expected capital expenditures for the 2011-2015 period.
|
|
Capital Expenditure (1) |
| ||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011-2015 |
|
Total |
|
357,932 |
|
385,535 |
|
184,263 |
|
1,310,065 |
|
(1) Capex figures represent accrued investments for each year, except for future projections.
Capital Expenditures 2008, 2009 and 2010
Our capital expenditures totaled Ch$ 184 billion in 2010, of which Ch$ 116 billion were incurred in Chile and Ch$ 68 billion abroad. In 2009, these expenditures aggregated Ch$ 386 billion, of which Ch$ 313 billion were incurred in Chile and the rest abroad. In 2008, these expenditures aggregated Ch$ 358 billion, of which Ch$ 252 billion were incurred in Chile and the rest abroad.
Investments in Chile
In 2010, we incurred total capital expenditures of Ch$ 116 billion. The main investment during 2010 related to the construction of the Bocamina II project, which is still in progress. Ch$ 70 billion was accrued in 2010 in connection with this project. It is estimated that the total investment will be Ch$ 400 billion. We also invested Ch$ 27 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity and Ch$ 19 billion in other minor projects.
In 2009, we incurred total capital expenditures of Ch$ 313 billion. The main investments carried out during 2009 were: the construction of the 60 MW Canela II wind farm, (Ch$ 44 billion was accrued in 2009 and the total investment was Ch$ 90 billion); the Quintero thermal plant project (Ch$ 33 billion was accrued in 2009, and the total investment was approximately Ch$ 90 billion); and the partial construction of Bocamina II, which is still in progress (Ch$ 152 billion was accrued in 2009, and the total investment is estimated at Ch$ 400 billion). We also invested Ch$ 48 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity and Ch$ 35 billion in other minor projects.
In 2008, we incurred total capital expenditures of Ch$ 252 billion. The main investments carried out during 2008 were: the construction of the Canela II wind farm (Ch$ 45 billion was accrued in 2008); the Quintero thermal plant project (Ch$ 41 billion accrued in 2008); the construction of Bocamina II (Ch$ 94 billion was accrued in 2008); and the construction of the Ojos de Agua pass-through hydroelectric plant that has an installed capacity of 9 MW (Ch$ 5 billion was accrued in 2008, and the total investment was Ch$ 15 billion). We also invested Ch$ 35 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity and Ch$ 32 billion in other minor projects.
Investments Abroad
In 2010, we incurred total capital expenditures abroad of Ch$ 68 billion. Our main investment during 2010 related to commencement of construction of our 400 MW El Quimbo hydroelectric power plant in Colombia. Ch$ 16 billion was accrued in 2010 for this project. It is estimated that the total investment will be Ch$ 630 billion. We also invested Ch$ 50 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity, in Argentina, Colombia and Peru, and Ch$ 1 billion in other minor projects.
In 2009, we incurred total capital expenditures of Ch$ 72 billion. Our main investment during 2009 was the installation of a 189 MW turbine at the Santa Rosa plant in Peru. Ch$ 10 billion was accrued in 2009 for this project. The total estimated investment was Ch$ 55 billion. We also invested Ch$ 57 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity, mainly in Argentina and Peru, and Ch$ 5 billion in other minor projects.
In 2008, we incurred total capital expenditures of Ch$ 106 billion. Our main investment during 2008 was the installation of the new turbine at the Santa Rosa power plant. Ch$ 45 billion was accrued in 2008. We also invested Ch$ 55 billion in maintenance of existing installed capacity mainly in Argentina and Colombia, and Ch$ 5 billion in other minor projects.
Investments currently in progress
In general terms, projects are expected to be financed with resources to be provided by external financing as well as internally generated funds for each of the companies described.
Investments in Chile
Our main investment currently in progress in Chile is the construction of the Bocamina II steam/coal-fired power plant, which is the second unit of our Bocamina power plant. This project is located in the Coronel district in the Bío-Bío region. Its installed capacity is estimated to be 370 MW and the start-up is planned for the second half of 2011. The total estimated investment is approximately Ch$ 400 billion.
Investments in Other Countries
Our main project being developed outside Chile is our 400 MW El Quimbo hydroelectric plant in Colombia. The principal civil works and equipment supply and assembly contracts have been awarded. The total estimated investment is approximately Ch$ 630 billion.
B. Business Overview.
We are a publicly held limited liability stock company with consolidated operations in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru and an equity interest in a Brazilian company. Our core business segment is electricity generation. We also participate in the engineering services industry and have a tunnel concession in Chile. The low amount of revenues from non-generation activities, less than 1.0% in terms of our 2010 revenues, does not justify the breakdown of revenues per activity. Additionally, we do not report them as a separate business segment for purposes of this discussion, or under IFRS.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||
Operating Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Generation (Chile) (1) |
|
1,609,158 |
|
1,373,231 |
|
1,345,371 |
|
(2.0 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) (1) |
|
33,035 |
|
35,418 |
|
19,734 |
|
(44.3 |
) |
Argentina |
|
284,228 |
|
296,578 |
|
352,358 |
|
18.8 |
|
Colombia |
|
401,470 |
|
500,964 |
|
507,516 |
|
1.3 |
|
Peru |
|
208,497 |
|
213,625 |
|
211,261 |
|
(1.1 |
) |
Consolidated Adjustments Foreign Subs |
|
|
|
(897 |
) |
(858 |
) |
4.4 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
2,536,388 |
|
2,418,919 |
|
2,435,382 |
|
0.7 |
|
(1) The differences in Generation and Other business in Chile compared to last years Form 20-F are explained by accounting reclassifications.
For further information related to operating revenue and total income by business segment, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects A. Operating Results and Note 30 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our consolidated installed capacity, as of December 31, 2010, was 13,845 MW, with 57.8% hydroelectric capacity, 41.6% thermal electric and 0.6% wind power generation capacity. Total installed capacity is defined as the maximum power capacity (measured in MW generation units) under specific technical conditions and characteristics.
We own and operate 28 generation facilities in Chile with an aggregate installed capacity, as of December 31, 2010, of 5,611 MW, 0.7% lower compared to the 5,650 MW in 2009. The difference in 39 MW in the 2010 figure is explained by the retirement of the Huasco ST Unit in July 2010 and a 23 MW decrease of the installed capacity of the Diego de Almagro in April 2010.
We accounted for 35.4% of Chiles total generation capacity as of December 31, 2010, measured by the maximum capacity calculated by CDEC-SIC. Hydroelectric installed capacity represents 61.7% of Endesa Chiles total installed capacity in Chile, thermoelectric installed capacity represents 36.9% and wind power represents 1.4%. The CDEC is the electricity dispatch center in the corresponding electric system. See Item 4 B. Business Overview Electricity Industry and Regulatory Framework.
As of December 31, 2010, we also had stakes in 26 generation facilities outside of Chile with an aggregate installed capacity of 8,235 MW, 0.2% higher compared to 8,214 MW in 2009. The only change in our total installed capacity outside Chile was in Colombia with the incorporation of the 19.5 MW mini hydro unit San Antonio, which started operations in May 2010. For additional detail on capacity increase of these units see Item 4 D. Property, Plants and Equipment. Hydroelectric installed capacity outside Chile represents 57.8% of Endesa Chiles total installed capacity outside Chile. Based on 2010 figures, the Companys installed generation capacity in Argentina, Colombia and Peru represents approximately 13%, 22% and 26% of total capacity in each country, respectively.
ENDESA CHILES CONSOLIDATED HYDRO/THERMAL GENERATION (GWh)(1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Hydroelectric generation (2) |
|
32,297 |
|
61 |
|
34,911 |
|
63 |
|
30,258 |
|
59 |
|
Thermal generation |
|
20,409 |
|
39 |
|
20,063 |
|
36 |
|
21,202 |
|
41 |
|
Other generation (3) |
|
49 |
|
0 |
|
56 |
|
0 |
|
143 |
|
0 |
|
Total generation |
|
52,754 |
|
100 |
|
55,030 |
|
100 |
|
51,603 |
|
100 |
|
(1) |
Generation minus power plants own consumption and technical losses. |
(2) |
The differences in Hydroelectric generation and Other generation in 2009, compared to last years Form 20-F, is explained by the reclassification of mini hydro Ojos de Agua, as hydroelectric generation instead of other generation. |
(3) |
Other generation refers to the generation of Canela and Canela II wind farms. |
Our consolidated electricity production reached 51,603 GWh in 2010, 6.2% lower than the 55,030 GWh produced in 2009. Peru was the only country in which we increased our generation from 8,163 GWh in 2009 to 8,466 GWh in 2010, an increase of 3.7%. In Colombia, Chile and Argentina, we decreased our generation by 1,390 GWh, 1,325 GWh and 1,014 GWh, respectively, decreases of 11.0%, 6.0% and 8.5% compared to our 2009 generation. Hydroelectric generation in 2010 in the four countries in which we consolidate results from operations was 13.2% lower than in 2009 and thermal generation in 2010 was 5.7% higher than in 2009.
Our consolidated physical energy sales for 2010 were 56,641 GWh, 5.4% lower than our consolidated physical energy sales of 59,859 GWh in 2009. The main decreases in sales were in Colombia and Argentina, and the only increase was in Peru, as illustrated in the following table:
ENDESA CHILE PHYSICAL DATA PER COUNTRY
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31 |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of generating facilities (1) (4) |
|
27 |
|
29 |
|
28 |
|
Installed capacity (MW) (2) (4) |
|
5,283 |
|
5,650 |
|
5,611 |
|
Energy generated (GWh) (3) |
|
21,267 |
|
22,239 |
|
20,914 |
|
Energy sales (GWh) |
|
21,532 |
|
22,327 |
|
21,847 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of generating facilities (1) |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
Installed capacity (MW) (2) |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
Energy generated (GWh) (3) |
|
10,480 |
|
11,955 |
|
10,940 |
|
Energy sales (GWh) |
|
11,098 |
|
12,405 |
|
11,378 |
|
Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of generating facilities (1) |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
Installed capacity (MW) (2) |
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,914 |
|
Energy generated (GWh) (3) |
|
12,905 |
|
12,674 |
|
11,283 |
|
Energy sales (GWh) |
|
16,368 |
|
16,806 |
|
14,817 |
|
Peru |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of generating facilities (1) (4) |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
Installed capacity (MW) (2) (4) |
|
1,467 |
|
1,667 |
|
1,668 |
|
Energy generated (GWh) (3) |
|
8,102 |
|
8,163 |
|
8,466 |
|
Energy sales (GWh) |
|
8,461 |
|
8,321 |
|
8,598 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of generating facilities (1) |
|
52 |
|
54 |
|
54 |
|
Installed capacity (MW) (2) |
|
13,297 |
|
13,864 |
|
13,846 |
|
Energy generated (GWh) (3) |
|
52,754 |
|
55,030 |
|
51,603 |
|
Energy sales (GWh) |
|
57,458 |
|
59,859 |
|
56,641 |
|
(1) For details on generation facilities, see Item 4 D. Property Plants and Equipment.
(2) Total installed capacity is defined as the maximum MW capacity in generation units, under specific technical conditions and characteristics, in most cases confirmed by satisfaction guarantee tests performed by equipment suppliers. Figures may differ from installed capacity declared to governmental authorities and customers in each country, according to criteria defined by such authorities and relevant contracts.
(3) Energy generated defined as total generation minus own power plant consumption and technical losses.
(4) Quintero and Canela II generation in Chile have been consolidated since July and December 2009, respectively; Santa Rosa TG8s generation in Peru since November 2009; and San Antonio mini hydro plant in Colombia since May 2010.
We segment our sales to customers using two different categories. First, we distinguish between regulated and unregulated customers. Regulated customers are distribution companies who mainly serve residential clients. Unregulated customers, on the other hand, may freely negotiate the price of electricity with generators or they may purchase electricity in the pool market at the spot price. The second criterion we use to segment our customer sales is by contracted sales and non-contracted sales. This method is useful because it provides a uniform way for us to compare our customers from country to country. The countries in which we operate have varying classifications for what constitutes a regulated customer. In contrast, contracted sales are defined uniformly throughout.
In general, in the countries in which we operate, the potential for contracting electricity is related to the volume of electricity demand. Customers identified as small volume regulated customers, such as residential customers, subject to government regulated electricity tariffs, must purchase electricity directly from a distribution company. These distribution companies, which purchase large amounts of electricity for small volume residential customers, generally enter into contractual agreements with generators at a regulated tariff price. Those identified as large volume industrial customers also enter into contractual agreements with energy suppliers. However, such large volume industrial customers are not subject to the regulated tariff price. Instead, these customers are allowed to negotiate the price of energy with generators based on the characteristics of the service required. Finally, the pool market, where energy is normally sold at the spot price, is not carried out through contractual agreements, but instead complies with pool market operations.
The following table contains information regarding Endesa Chiles consolidated sales of electricity by type of customer for each of the periods indicated:
ENDESA CHILE CONSOLIDATED PHYSICAL SALES BY TYPE OF CUSTOMER (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of Sales |
|
Sales |
|
% of Sales |
|
Sales |
|
% of Sales |
|
Regulated customers |
|
24,479 |
|
42.6 |
|
25,517 |
|
42.6 |
|
27,670 |
|
48.9 |
|
Unregulated customers |
|
15,512 |
|
27.0 |
|
14,280 |
|
23.9 |
|
13,264 |
|
23.4 |
|
Electricity pool market sales |
|
17,467 |
|
30.4 |
|
20,062 |
|
33.5 |
|
15,707 |
|
27.7 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
57,458 |
|
100.0 |
|
59,859 |
|
100.0 |
|
56,641 |
|
100.0 |
|
The specific energy consumption limit (measured in GWh) for regulated and unregulated customers is country specific. Moreover, regulatory frameworks often require that regulated distribution companies have contracts to support their commitments to small volume customers, and also determine which customers can purchase energy in electricity pool markets.
The following table contains information regarding our consolidated physical sales of electricity per customer segment:
ENDESA CHILE CONSOLIDATED PHYSICAL SALES PER CUSTOMER PRICE SEGMENT (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Contracted sales (1) |
|
39,991 |
|
69.6 |
|
39,797 |
|
66.5 |
|
40,934 |
|
72.3 |
|
Non-contracted sales |
|
17,467 |
|
30.4 |
|
20,062 |
|
33.5 |
|
15,707 |
|
27.7 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
57,458 |
|
100.0 |
|
59,859 |
|
100.0 |
|
56,641 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) |
Includes the sales to distribution companies not backed by contracts in Chile and Peru. |
In terms of expenses, the primary variable costs involved in the electricity generation business, in addition to the direct variable cost of generating hydroelectric or thermal electricity such as fuel costs, are energy purchases and transportation costs. During periods of relatively low rainfall conditions, the amount of our thermal generation increases. This not only involves increasing the total cost of fuel but also the cost of transporting that fuel to the thermal generation power plants. Under drought conditions, electricity that we have contractually agreed to provide may exceed the amount of electricity that we are able to generate, requiring us to purchase electricity in the pool market in order to satisfy our contractual commitments. The cost of these pool market purchases may, under certain circumstances, exceed the price at which we sell electricity under contracts and result in a loss. We attempt to minimize the effect of poor hydrological conditions on our operations in any year primarily by limiting contractual sales requirements to an amount that does not exceed the estimated production in a dry year. In determining estimated production in a dry year, we take into account available statistical information concerning rainfall and water flows, and the capacity of key reservoirs. In addition to limiting contracted sales, we may adopt other strategies such as installing temporary thermal capacity, negotiating lower consumption levels with unregulated customers, negotiating with other water users and including pass-through cost clauses in contracts with clients.
The following table contains information regarding our electricity generation and purchases:
CONSOLIDATED PHYSICAL GENERATION AND PURCHASES (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales (GWh) |
|
% of Sales |
|
Sales (GWh) |
|
% of Sales |
|
Sales (GWh) |
|
% of Sales |
|
Electricity generation |
|
52,754 |
|
90.5 |
|
55,030 |
|
90.6 |
|
51,603 |
|
89.8 |
|
Electricity purchases |
|
5,528 |
|
9.5 |
|
5,682 |
|
9.4 |
|
5,844 |
|
10.2 |
|
Total(1) |
|
58,282 |
|
100.0 |
|
60,712 |
|
100.0 |
|
57,447 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) |
Total energy generation (GWh) plus purchases differs from GWh sales due to technical transmission losses in Chile and Peru, as the generation figure has already deducted power plant consumption and technical losses of generation units. |
We have a 50% beneficial interest in GasAtacama Chile S.A., through which we participate in the gas transportation and thermal generation business in northern Chile. Since March 2008, we have a 51% beneficial interest in HidroAysén, through which we participate in a hydroelectric project in the Aysén Region. We also participate in the gas transportation business in Chile through our related company, Electrogas S.A. (Electrogas), in which we have a 42.5% beneficial interest. Electrogas owns a pipeline in the Valparaíso Region and supplies natural gas to the power plants of San Isidro and Nehuenco. The other shareholders are Colbún S.A. and ENAP.
Since September 2005, our participation in the Brazilian electricity business is carried out through our equity investment in Endesa Brasil S.A, in which we have a beneficial interest of 38.9%. Endesa Brasil consolidates operations of two generation companies, Central Geradora Termeléctrica Endesa Fortaleza S.A., (Endesa Fortaleza), and Cachoeira Dourada; CIEN, which owns two transmission lines between Argentina and Brazil; CTM and TESA, subsidiaries of CIEN which own the Argentine side of the lines; and two distribution companies, Ampla Energía e Servicos S.A., (Ampla), which is the second largest electricity distribution company in the State of Rio de Janeiro, and Companhia Energética do Ceará S.A. (Coelce), which is the sole electricity distributor in the State of Ceará.
Operations in Chile
We own and operate a total of 28 generation facilities in Chile directly and through our subsidiaries Pehuenche, Pangue, San Isidro, Celta, Endesa Eco and our jointly controlled company GasAtacama. Of these generation facilities, 16 are hydroelectric, with a total installed capacity of 3,465 MW. This represents 61.7% of our total installed capacity in Chile. There are ten thermal facilities that operate with gas, coal or oil with a total installed capacity of 2,068 MW, representing 36.9% of our total installed capacity in Chile. There are two wind power facilities with 78 MW in the aggregate, representing 1.4% of our total installed capacity in Chile. All of our generation facilities are connected to the countrys central interconnected electricity systems, Sistema Interconectado Central, or the SIC, except for three power facilities (GasAtacama and two Celta units) which are connected to the northern Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande, or the SING.
The following table sets forth the installed generation capacity for each of the Companys Chilean subsidiaries:
INSTALLED CAPACITY PER SUBSIDIARY IN CHILE (MW)
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Endesa |
|
3,139 |
|
3,446 |
|
3,407 |
|
Pehuenche |
|
699 |
|
699 |
|
699 |
|
Pangue |
|
467 |
|
467 |
|
467 |
|
San Isidro |
|
379 |
|
379 |
|
379 |
|
Celta |
|
182 |
|
182 |
|
182 |
|
GasAtacama (1) |
|
390 |
|
390 |
|
390 |
|
Endesa Eco |
|
27 |
|
87 |
|
87 |
|
Total |
|
5,283 |
|
5,650 |
|
5,611 |
|
(1) |
Since 2008, we include 50% of GasAtacamas installed capacity, our jointly-controlled company. |
Our total electricity generation in Chile (including the SIC and the SING) reached 20,914 GWh in 2010, 6.0% lower than in 2009, and accounted for 35.8% of total electricity production in Chile during 2010.
The following table sets forth the electricity generation for each of our Chilean subsidiaries:
ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Endesa |
|
12,204 |
|
12,265 |
|
11,539 |
|
Pehuenche |
|
3,589 |
|
3,613 |
|
2,970 |
|
Pangue |
|
1,763 |
|
2,113 |
|
1,615 |
|
San Isidro |
|
1,289 |
|
1,616 |
|
2,157 |
|
Celta |
|
912 |
|
981 |
|
995 |
|
GasAtacama |
|
1,460 |
|
1,558 |
|
1,445 |
|
Endesa Eco |
|
49 |
|
94 |
|
192 |
|
Total |
|
21,267 |
|
22,239 |
|
20,914 |
|
Hydroelectric generation in 2010 was 15.1% lower than in 2009, explained by lower hydrology in 2010. At December 31, 2010 Chilean reservoir levels contained 2,198 GWh in lower potential energy than in December 31, 2009; a decrease of 38%. The main decrease was in Endesa Chiles Laja Reservoir where lower reservoir levels resulted in 1.122 GWh of lower potential energy. The reduced levels of the Laja Reservoir may pose problems for 2011 generation in the event that hydrology does not improve significantly.
The following table shows the potential energy in Chilean reservoirs:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
2009 vs 2010 |
|
Reservoir (company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laja (Endesa Chile) |
|
3,107 |
|
3,045 |
|
1,923 |
|
(37 |
) |
Maule (Colbún and Endesa Chile) |
|
1,111 |
|
957 |
|
789 |
|
(18 |
) |
Chapo (Canutillar) |
|
266 |
|
372 |
|
93 |
|
(75 |
) |
Colbún (Colbún) |
|
406 |
|
485 |
|
471 |
|
(3 |
) |
Ralco (Endesa Chile) |
|
398 |
|
484 |
|
207 |
|
(57 |
) |
Invernada (Endesa Chile) |
|
296 |
|
314 |
|
33 |
|
(89 |
) |
Rapel (Endesa Chile) |
|
60 |
|
76 |
|
28 |
|
(63 |
) |
Melado (Endesa Chile) |
|
9 |
|
13 |
|
6 |
|
(56 |
) |
Pangue (Endesa Chile) |
|
11 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
(4 |
) |
Total |
|
5,664 |
|
5,757 |
|
3,559 |
|
(38 |
) |
Hydroelectric generation in Chile accounted for 60.4% of our total electricity generation in 2010 compared with 66.8% in 2009. Generation by type in Chile is shown in the following table:
ENDESA CHILE HYDRO/THERMAL GENERATION IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Generation |
|
% |
|
Generation |
|
% |
|
Generation |
|
% |
|
Hydroelectric generation |
|
13,766 |
|
64.7 |
|
14.864 |
|
66.8 |
|
12,625 |
|
60.4 |
|
Thermal generation |
|
7,453 |
|
35.0 |
|
7,319 |
|
32.9 |
|
8,146 |
|
38.9 |
|
Other generation (1) |
|
49 |
|
0.2 |
|
56 |
|
0.3 |
|
143 |
|
0.7 |
|
Total generation |
|
21,267 |
|
100.0 |
|
22,239 |
|
100.0 |
|
20,914 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Other generation refers to the generation of the Canela and Canela II wind farms.
Our thermal electric generation facilities are either natural gas, LNG, coal or oil-fired. In order to satisfy our natural gas and transportation requirements, we enter into long-term gas contracts with suppliers who establish maximum supply amounts and prices and long-term gas transportation agreements with the pipeline companies, which are currently Gas Andes and Electrogas (an Endesa Chile related company). Since March 2008, all of Endesa Chiles natural gas units can operate with natural gas or diesel and since December 2009, San Isidro, San Isidro 2 and Quintero can operate with LNG.
Because of the lack of Argentine natural gas since 2006, Endesa Chile has been using coal and diesel in an intensive manner and LNG, more recently, has replaced our dependence on Argentine natural gas. Diesel consumption in 2008, 2009 and 2010 was 728,000 tons, 430,000 tons and 51,000 tons in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. On the other hand, coal consumption was 774,000 tons, 760,000 tons and 486,000 tons, respectively. In 2010, Endesa Chile signed a coal supply contract for 2010 and 2011 with Carboex, a subsidiary of Endesa Spain. LNG consumption has been 206 million m(3) and 978 million m(3) in 2009 and 2010, respectively.
In May 2007, as part of a consortium with ENAP, Metrogas and British Gas, in which Endesa Chiles participation is 20%, we agreed to the construction of the LNG re-gasification facility in Quintero Bay, in order to deal with the lack of Argentine natural gas. Partial operations began in September 2009. In October 2010 the construction of the facilities was finished, and full commercial operations started on January 1, 2011.
Thermal Unit Quintero began partial commercial operations in July 2009 and full commercial operations in September 2009 using diesel fuel. Partial commercial operations burning LNG began in November 2009 and full commercial operations began in December 2009.
The main effects in the generation of Endesa Chile due to the incorporation of this terminal are as follows: i) San Isidro 2 increased its installed capacity from 353 MW to 399 MW; ii) San Isidro, San Isidro 2 and Quintero may generate with LNG, reducing the operating costs and the environmental impact due to the replacement of diesel fuel by LNG.
The electricity sales per system in Chile had an increase of 3.4% during 2010; sales in the SIC increased 4.2% and sales in the SING increased 1.0%, as is shown in the following table:
ELECTRICITY SALES PER SYSTEM IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
Sales |
|
Sales |
|
Electricity sales in the SIC |
|
39,594 |
|
39,401 |
|
41,061 |
|
Electricity sales in the SING |
|
13,219 |
|
13,657 |
|
13,792 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
52,813 |
|
53,057 |
|
54,854 |
|
Our physical energy sales in Chile reached 22,327 GWh in 2009 and 21,847 GWh in 2010, which represent a 42.1% and 39.8% market share, respectively. The percentage of the energy purchases to satisfy our contractual obligations to third parties has increased from 2.3% in 2009 to 6.0% in 2010 as a result of the decrease in our generation.
The following table sets forth our electricity purchases and production in Chile:
PHYSICAL GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Electricity generation |
|
21,267 |
|
96.8 |
|
22,239 |
|
97.7 |
|
20,914 |
|
94.0 |
|
Electricity purchases |
|
698 |
|
3.2 |
|
532 |
|
2.3 |
|
1,344 |
|
6.0 |
|
Total (1) |
|
21,965 |
|
100 |
|
22,772 |
|
100 |
|
22,257 |
|
100 |
|
(1) Electricity generation plus electricity purchases differ from electricity sales due to transmission losses, as power plant consumption and technical energy losses have already been deducted.
We supply electricity to the major regulated electricity distribution companies, large unregulated industrial firms (primarily in the mining, pulp and steel sectors) and the pool market. Commercial relationships with customers are usually governed by contracts. Supply contracts with distribution companies must be auctioned, are generally standardized and have an average term of ten years.
Supply contracts with unregulated customers (large industrial customers) are specific to the needs of each client and the conditions are agreed between both parties, reflecting competitive market conditions.
In 2008, 2009 and 2010, Endesa Chile (including GasAtacama) had 40, 44 and 59 customers, respectively. In 2010, customers included 27 distribution companies in the SIC and in the SING, 29 unregulated industrial customers in the SIC and the SING and three minor commercial customers. The following table sets forth information regarding our sales of electricity in Chile by type of customer:
PHYSICAL SALES PER CUSTOMER PRICE SEGMENT
IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Regulated customers |
|
12,166 |
|
56.5 |
|
11,966 |
|
53.6 |
|
13,840 |
|
63.3 |
|
Unregulated customers |
|
6,034 |
|
28.0 |
|
6,177 |
|
27.7 |
|
6,456 |
|
29.6 |
|
Electricity pool market sales |
|
3,331 |
|
15.5 |
|
4,183 |
|
18.7 |
|
1,551 |
|
7.1 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
21,532 |
|
100.0 |
|
22,327 |
|
100.0 |
|
21,847 |
|
100.0 |
|
Our most significant supply contracts with regulated customers are with Chilectra S.A. (Chilectra), an almost wholly-owned Enersis subsidiary, and Compañía General de Electricidad S.A. (CGE), an unrelated company, the two largest distribution companies in Chile in terms of sales.
In March 2008, Chilectra and other distributors allocated the third long-term energy bid for 1,800 GWh for the period 2011-2021 and 1,500 GWh for the period 2022-2023, in both cases to Gener. In January 2009, Chilquinta, Saesa and CGE allocated the bid for 8,010 GWh, divided in four blocks (BB1, BB2, BB3 and BB4) to be delivered starting in January 2010 for 14, 12, 14 and 15 years, respectively. The energy allocated was 7,110 GWh and represented 88.7% of the bidders demand. The energy allocation per company and per block was as follows:
|
|
BB1 - |
|
BB2 - |
|
BB3 - CGE |
|
BB4 - |
|
Total per |
|
Gener |
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Endesa |
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2,660 |
|
Campanario |
|
|
|
850 |
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Monte Redondo |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Colbún |
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated |
|
1,760 |
|
850 |
|
2,500 |
|
2,000 |
|
7,110 |
|
Total required |
|
1,760 |
|
850 |
|
2,700 |
|
2,700 |
|
8,010 |
|
% allocated |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
92.6 |
% |
74.1 |
% |
88.7 |
|
In July 2009, CGE allocated the fourth long-term bid for 850 GWh per year, from 2010 to 2021, as follows:
|
|
CGE |
|
Endesa |
|
400 |
|
Monte Redondo |
|
175 |
|
Emelda |
|
200 |
|
Eléctrica Puntilla |
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated |
|
850 |
|
At a recent bid jointly held by Chilectra and Chilquinta, Endesa was awarded with 50 GWh for 2013, 400 GWh for 2014, 1,250 GWh for 2015, and 1,700 GWh per year for the 2016-2026 period. These contracts end with 1,350 GWh in 2027. It is important to note that these energy contracts includes a 10% variation in energy, so the energy supplied could reach 1,870 GWh per year. The breakdown by year and energy block is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Years (amounts in GWh) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
|
Block |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
2022 |
|
2023 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 |
|
2026 |
|
2027 |
|
Chilectra |
|
BB1 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
900 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,350 |
|
Chilquinta |
|
BSE4 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
Chilquinta |
|
BSE5 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
Chilquinta |
|
BSE6 |
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
|
|
ENDESA |
|
TOTAL |
|
50 |
|
400 |
|
1,250 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,700 |
|
1,350 |
|
Our contracts with unregulated customers are generally on a long term basis, and typically range from five to fifteen years. Such contracts are usually automatically extended at the end of the applicable term, unless terminated by either party upon prior notice. Some of them include a price adjustment mechanism in the case of high marginal costs, which also reduces the hydrological risk. Contracts with unregulated customers may also include specifications regarding power sources and equipment, which may be provided at special rates, as well as provisions for technical assistance to the customer. We have not experienced any supply interruptions under our contracts. In case of force majeure events, as contractually defined, which affect our unregulated customers, we are allowed to reject purchases and we are not required to supply electricity. Disputes are typically subject to binding arbitration between the parties, subject to limited exceptions.
The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our five largest distribution and unregulated customers in Chile for each of the periods indicated:
MAIN CUSTOMERS IN CHILE (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 (5) |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of total |
|
Sales |
|
% of total |
|
Sales |
|
% of total |
|
Distribution companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilectra |
|
3,727 |
|
17.3 |
|
3,731 |
|
16.7 |
|
5,929 |
|
27.1 |
|
CGE |
|
4,800 |
|
22.3 |
|
4,727 |
|
21.2 |
|
3,541 |
|
16.2 |
|
Chilquinta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
4.1 |
|
Saesa (1) |
|
766 |
|
3.6 |
|
669 |
|
3.0 |
|
779 |
|
3.6 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica de la Frontera S.A. (2) |
|
1 |
|
0.0 |
|
1 |
|
0.0 |
|
282 |
|
1.3 |
|
Grupo Emel. (3) |
|
845 |
|
3.9 |
|
868 |
|
3.9 |
|
1229 |
|
5.6 |
|
Total sales to five largest distribution companies |
|
10,139 |
|
47.1 |
|
9,997 |
|
44.8 |
|
12,655 |
|
57.9 |
|
Unregulated customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Codelco |
|
482 |
|
2.2 |
|
540 |
|
2.4 |
|
545 |
|
2.5 |
|
CMPC |
|
973 |
|
4.5 |
|
912 |
|
4.1 |
|
773 |
|
3.5 |
|
Cía. Minera Los Pelambres |
|
874 |
|
4.1 |
|
926 |
|
4.1 |
|
1,113 |
|
5.1 |
|
Cía. Minera Collahuasi (4) |
|
1,043 |
|
4.8 |
|
1,099 |
|
4.9 |
|
1,114 |
|
5.1 |
|
Cía. Minera Escondida |
|
645 |
|
3.0 |
|
692 |
|
3.1 |
|
638 |
|
2.9 |
|
Cía. Acero del Pacífico Huachipato |
|
568 |
|
2.6 |
|
500 |
|
2.2 |
|
386 |
|
1.8 |
|
Total sales to six largest unregulated customers |
|
4,586 |
|
21.3 |
|
4,667 |
|
20.9 |
|
4,569 |
|
20.9 |
|
(1) During 2008 and 2009 we did not have a contract with Saesa. Sales during those years were the result of government Resolution 88 that forces generators of the CDEC-SIC system to supply energy to distribution companies without contracts.
(2) Until December 2007, Empresa Eléctrica de la Frontera S.A., (Frontel), was a party to two contracts: one was with Endesa Chile and one with Pangue. In 2008, the contract with Endesa Chile terminated. The consumption by Frontel as the result of Resolution 88 is not included in this table. Frontel is a subsidiary of Saesa.
(3) The values of the Emel Group for years 2008, 2009 and 2010 includes the 50% of the consumption of the distributors Empresa Eléctrica de Arica, Emelari, Empresa Eléctrica de Iquique S.A., Eliqsa, and Empresa Eléctrica de Antofagasta, Elecda, clients of GasAtacama, and the consumption of the Empresa Eléctrica de Atacama S.A, Emelat, a client of Celta. The consumptions as the result of government Resolution 88 are not included in this table. Emel group is a subsidiary of the CGE group.
(4) Consumptions of Cía Minera Collahuasi include the 50% of the contract of GasAtacama with this client and the contracts with Celta.
(5) In 2008, we agreed on a reduction of energy consumption with some customers, including CMPC and Codelco Salvador.
We compete in the SIC primarily with two generation companies, Gener and Colbún S.A. (Colbún). According to the CDEC-SIC in 2010, Gener and its subsidiaries in the SIC had an installed capacity of 2,339 MW, of which 88.2% was thermoelectric, and Colbún with 2,491 MW, of which 51.7% was thermoelectric. In addition to these two large competitors, there are a number of smaller entities with an aggregate installed capacity of 2,287 MW that generate electricity in the SIC.
Our primary competitors in the SING are E-CL (GDF Suez Group) and Gener, which have 1,798 MW and 931 MW of installed capacity, respectively. Our direct participation in the SING, includes our 182 MW Tarapacá thermal plant, owned by our subsidiary Celta, and our participation through our jointly controlled company, GasAtacama, whose power plant has 781 MW of installed capacity. An installed capacity of 390 MW is included in this report as installed capacity of Endesa Chile, an amount that corresponds to Endesa Chiles 50% ownership of GasAtacama. See Item 4 C. Organizational Structure for details on related companies.
Electricity generation companies compete largely on the basis of price, technical experience and reliability. In addition, because 61.7% of our installed capacity in the SIC derives from hydroelectric power plants, we have lower marginal production costs than companies generating electricity with thermal plants. During periods of extended droughts, however,
we may be forced to buy more expensive electricity from thermoelectric generators at spot prices in order to satisfy our contractual obligations.
Directly and through our subsidiaries Pehuenche, Pangue, San Isidro and Endesa Eco, we are the principal operators in the SIC, with 41.5% of the total installed capacity and 46.2% of the physical energy sales of this system in 2010.
In the SING, our subsidiary Celta, and our jointly controlled company GasAtacama, account for 15.5% of the total installed capacity in 2010. Celta, our subsidiary, has a two-turbine 182 MW thermal power plant connected to the SING which represents 4.9% of the total capacity of the SING. For Endesa Chile, GasAtacama represents a total of 390 MW or 10.6% of the total capacity in the SING. For further information regarding to our generaction capacity in Chile as of December 31, 2010, please see D. Property, Plants and Equipment
Operations in Argentina
We participate in electricity generation in Argentina through our subsidiaries Endesa Costanera and El Chocón, with a total of five power plants. El Chocón owns two hydroelectric power plants, with total installed capacity of 1,328 MW and Endesa Costanera owns three thermal plants, with a total installed capacity of 2,324 MW. Our hydro and thermal generation plants in Argentina represented 13.0% of the Sistema Interconectado Nacional (the Argentine NIS) installed capacity in 2010.
Our Argentine subsidiaries participate in two new companies, Manuel Belgrano and San Martín. These companies were formed to undertake the construction of two new generation facilities for FONINVEMEM. These power plants started operations using gas turbines in 2008, with 1,125 MW of aggregate capacity, and as combined cycles as of March 2010, with an additional 572 MW. The total aggregate capacity of these units is 1,697 MW (848 MW for Manuel Belgrano and 849 MW for San Martín).
Since 2002, government intervention and energy industry authority actions, including limiting the spot price of electricity by considering the variable cost of generating electricity with natural gas and without considering the hydrological conditions of rivers and reservoirs or the use of more expensive fuels, have led to the lack of investment in the electric power sector. (See Item 4 Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework and Item 4 A. History and Development of the Company for further detail).
As of December 31, 2010, Endesa Costaneras installed capacity accounted for 8.3% of the total installed capacity in the Argentine NIS. Endesa Costaneras second combined-cycle plant can operate with either natural gas or diesel. Our 1,138 MW steam turbine power plant can operate with either natural gas or fuel oil.
El Chocón accounted for 4.7% of the installed capacity in the Argentine NIS as of December 31, 2010. El Chocón has a 30-year concession, ending in 2023, for two hydroelectric generation facilities with an aggregate of 1,328 MW of installed capacity. The larger of the two facilities for which El Chocón has a concession of 1,200 MW in installed capacity is the primary flood control installation on the Limay River. The facilitys large reservoir, Ezequiel Ramos Mejía, enables El Chocón to be one of the Argentine NIS major peak suppliers. Variations in El Chocóns water discharge are moderated by El Chocóns Arroyito facility, a downstream dam with 128 MW of installed capacity. In November 2008, we finished construction work on the Arroyito dam, and increased the elevation of the reservoir water level, that allows releasing water at an additional 1,150 m3/sec, for a total of 3,750 m3/sec. The additional energy (69 GWh/year) was sold on the spot market until April 2009 and under Energy Plus program thereafter. Energy Plus program is the offer of new electricity capacity to supply the electricity demand growth, on top of the demand level for electricity in 2005. (For details on Energy Plus, see Item 4 - Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework).
The following table sets forth the installed capacity of our Argentine subsidiaries:
INSTALLED CAPACITY PER SUBSIDIARY IN ARGENTINA (MW)
|
|
As of December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera (steam turbines) |
|
1,138 |
|
1,138 |
|
1,138 |
|
Endesa Costanera (combined cycle II) |
|
859 |
|
859 |
|
859 |
|
Central Termoeléctrica Buenos Aires (combined cycle I) |
|
327 |
|
327 |
|
327 |
|
El Chocón |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chócon (reservoir) |
|
1,200 |
|
1,200 |
|
1,200 |
|
Arroyito (pass-through) |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
Total |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
Our total generation in Argentina reached 10,940 GWh in 2010, 8.5% lower than our 11,955 GWh total electricity generation in 2009. Our generation market share was approximately 9.5% of total electricity production in Argentina during 2010.
The following table sets forth the electricity generation of our Argentine subsidiaries:
ELECTRICITY GENERATION PER SUBSIDIARY IN ARGENTINA (GWh)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
8,540 |
|
8,172 |
|
7,965 |
|
El Chocón |
|
1,940 |
|
3,783 |
|
2,975 |
|
Total |
|
10,480 |
|
11,955 |
|
10,940 |
|
Hydroelectric generation in Argentina accounted for nearly 27.2% of total generation in 2010, four percentage points lower than in 2009. This was due to the restrictions of the operation of El Chocón that were imposed by CAMMESA and the low level of the reservoir during 2010; that resulted from the drought conditions during the second half of 2010 in the Limay River and in the Collón Curá River, the main tributaries of El Chocón. The monthly flow of the rivers during 2010 and the monthly average is shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
Jan |
|
Feb |
|
Mar |
|
Apr |
|
May |
|
Jun |
|
Jul |
|
Aug |
|
Sep |
|
Oct |
|
Nov |
|
Dec |
|
Limay m3/s |
|
2010 |
|
307 |
|
216 |
|
157 |
|
119 |
|
112 |
|
134 |
|
251 |
|
204 |
|
245 |
|
246 |
|
308 |
|
282 |
|
|
Average |
|
250 |
|
178 |
|
125 |
|
113 |
|
167 |
|
292 |
|
357 |
|
366 |
|
345 |
|
342 |
|
358 |
|
329 |
| |
|
% |
|
123 |
% |
121 |
% |
126 |
% |
105 |
% |
67 |
% |
46 |
% |
70 |
% |
56 |
% |
71 |
% |
72 |
% |
86 |
% |
86 |
% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collón Curá m3/s |
|
2010 |
|
246 |
|
122 |
|
79 |
|
72 |
|
90 |
|
224 |
|
427 |
|
282 |
|
420 |
|
549 |
|
589 |
|
381 |
|
|
Average |
|
218 |
|
123 |
|
89 |
|
105 |
|
268 |
|
575 |
|
645 |
|
587 |
|
568 |
|
633 |
|
644 |
|
452 |
| |
|
% |
|
113 |
% |
99 |
% |
89 |
% |
69 |
% |
34 |
% |
39 |
% |
66 |
% |
48 |
% |
74 |
% |
87 |
% |
91 |
% |
84 |
% |
The volumes and percentages of hydroelectric and thermal generation are shown in the following table:
HYDRO/THERMAL GENERATION IN ARGENTINA (GWh) (1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Hydroelectric generation |
|
1,940 |
|
18.5 |
|
3,783 |
|
31.6 |
|
2,975 |
|
27.2 |
|
Thermal generation |
|
8,540 |
|
81.5 |
|
8,172 |
|
68.4 |
|
7,965 |
|
72.8 |
|
Total generation |
|
10,480 |
|
100.0 |
|
11,955 |
|
100.0 |
|
10,940 |
|
100.0 |
|
The amount of energy generated and purchased in the last three years is shown in the following table:
PHYSICAL GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN ARGENTINA (GWh)
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Electricity generation |
|
10,480 |
|
93.8 |
|
11,955 |
|
95.8 |
|
10,940 |
|
95.5 |
|
Electricity purchases |
|
694 |
|
6.2 |
|
528 |
|
4.2 |
|
517 |
|
4.5 |
|
Total (1) |
|
11,174 |
|
100.0 |
|
12,483 |
|
100.0 |
|
11,457 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Energy generation plus energy purchases differs from electricity sales due to the power plants own energy consumption.
The distribution of physical sales in Argentina, in terms of customer segment, is shown in the following table:
PHYSICAL SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN ARGENTINA (GWh)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% of |
|
(GWh) |
|
% of Sales |
|
(GWh) |
|
% of Sales |
|
Contracted sales |
|
2,397 |
|
21.6 |
|
2,128 |
|
17.2 |
|
2,142 |
|
18.8 |
|
Non-contracted sales |
|
8,701 |
|
78.4 |
|
10,278 |
|
82.8 |
|
9,236 |
|
81.2 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
11,098 |
|
100.0 |
|
12,405 |
|
100.0 |
|
11,378 |
|
100.0 |
|
PHYSICAL SALES PER SUBSIDIARY IN ARGENTINA (GWh)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
8,543 |
|
8,284 |
|
8,018 |
|
El Chocón |
|
2,554 |
|
4,122 |
|
3,361 |
|
Total |
|
11,098 |
|
12,405 |
|
11,378 |
|
During 2010, Endesa Costanera served an average of 37 unregulated customers. Endesa Costanera has no contract with distribution companies. Given the regulatory measures adopted since 2003, the current Argentine electricity industry price scenario makes sales to distribution companies less attractive than sales to the wholesale market.
The following table sets forth Endesa Costaneras sales to its largest unregulated customers for each of the periods indicated:
ENDESA COSTANERAS MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
YPF |
|
233 |
|
22.5 |
|
122 |
|
15.8 |
|
188 |
|
25.7 |
|
Acindar |
|
88 |
|
8.5 |
|
29 |
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Solvay (1) |
|
130 |
|
12.5 |
|
96 |
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Transclor |
|
63 |
|
6.1 |
|
58 |
|
7.5 |
|
60 |
|
8.2 |
|
Peugeot |
|
63 |
|
6.1 |
|
48 |
|
6.2 |
|
59 |
|
8.0 |
|
Cencosud |
|
59 |
|
5.7 |
|
71 |
|
9.2 |
|
70 |
|
9.6 |
|
Rasic Hnos. |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
5.5 |
|
39 |
|
5.3 |
|
Total sales to our largest unregulated customers |
|
635 |
|
61.5 |
|
464 |
|
60.3 |
|
416 |
|
56.9 |
|
(1) Since September 2009 the contract with Solvay started to decline, because Solvay started to supply themselves with a cogeneration plant.
Sales to the pool market decreased from 7,511 GWh in 2009 to 7,286 GWh in 2010; this reduction is mainly explained by the reduction in thermal generation, due to maintenance of the Central Termoeléctrica Buenos Aires unit during the first quarter of 2010.
During 2008 and 2009, Endesa Costanera, through its subsidiary Endesa Cemsa S.A. (Cemsa), negotiated with a number of gas producers, which allowed Endesa Costanera to diversify and improve the availability of gas for supply to Endesa Costaneras units, including the ability to trade gas with other generators.
In October 2010, Endesa Costanera started energy exports of power to the company Usinas y transmisiones Eléctricas (Uruguay) with gas imported from Bolivia.
During 2009, El Chocón served an average of 21 unregulated customers. El Chocón has no contract with distribution companies.
The following table sets forth sales by volume to the largest unregulated customers of El Chocón for each of the periods indicated:
EL CHOCONS MAIN CUSTOMERS (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Minera Alumbrera |
|
571 |
|
41.9 |
|
542 |
|
40.0 |
|
505 |
|
35.8 |
|
Profertil (Cemsa) (1) |
|
94 |
|
6.9 |
|
115 |
|
8.5 |
|
112 |
|
7.9 |
|
Massuh |
|
85 |
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chevron |
|
136 |
|
10.0 |
|
120 |
|
8.8 |
|
91 |
|
6.4 |
|
Acindar (Cemsa) (1) |
|
88 |
|
6.4 |
|
75 |
|
5.5 |
|
80 |
|
5.7 |
|
Praxair |
|
89 |
|
6.5 |
|
80 |
|
5.9 |
|
87 |
|
6.2 |
|
Air Liquide |
|
30 |
|
2.2 |
|
122 |
|
9.0 |
|
131 |
|
9.3 |
|
Total sales to our largest unregulated customers |
|
1,093 |
|
80.1 |
|
1,055 |
|
77.8 |
|
1,006 |
|
71.3 |
|
(1) Profertil and Acindar do not have contracts with El Chocón, but are served through Cemsa, an Endesa Chile affiliate.
El Chocón does not have the right to terminate the operating agreement, unless we fail to perform our obligations under the agreement. Under the terms of the operating agreement, we are entitled to a fee payable in dollars based on El Chocóns annual gross revenues, payable in monthly installments. The management fee for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $ 2.2 million, $ 2.4 million and $ 2.3 million, respectively.
Electricity demand in the Argentine NIS increased 5.9% during 2010. Total electricity demand was 105,938 GWh in 2008, 104,592 GWh in 2009 and 110,767 GWh in 2010. Our Argentine subsidiaries compete with all the major power plants connected to the Argentine NIS. According to the installed capacity reported by CAMMESA in the monthly report for December 2010, our major competitors in Argentina are the state-controlled company Enarsa (with an installed capacity of 640 MW), nuclear units -NASA- (1,005 MW) and the binational hydroelectric units Yacyreta and Salto Grande (3,225 MW in total). The main private competitors are: AES Group, Sociedad Argentina de Energía S.A. (Sadesa), and Pampa Energía. The AES Group has nine power plants connected to the Argentine NIS with a total capacity of 2,810 MW (43% of which is hydro) and one plant that is not connected to the Argentine NIS that delivers energy to the Chilean SING, Termo Andes, with a total capacity of 411 MW. On the other hand, Sadesa owns a total of approximately 3,860 MW, the most important of which are Piedra del Aguila (hydro, 1,400 MW) and Central Puerto (thermal, 1,777 MW), while Pampa Energía competes with us with five power plants, Diamante and Nihuiles (both hydro, 612 MW in total), and Güemes, Loma de la Lata and Piedra Buena (thermal, 1,356 MW in total).
Operations in Colombia
Until August 2007, we controlled two electricity generation companies in Colombia, Betania and Emgesa. These companies were merged into Betania, which then changed its name to Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. or Emgesa. We have a 26.9% stake in Emgesa as of December 31, 2010, which we control and consolidate pursuant a transfer of rights from another subsidiary of Endesa Spain.
As of December 31, 2010, our Colombian subsidiary operated 12 generation facilities in Colombia, with a total installed capacity of 2,914 MW. Emgesa has 2,471 MW in hydroelectric plants and 444 MW in thermoelectric plants. In May 2010, the 19.5 MW mini hydro unit San Antonio started operations.
Our hydroelectric and thermal generation plants in Colombia represent 21.8% of the countrys total electricity generation capacity as of December 2010.
The following table sets forth the installed generation capacity of our Colombian subsidiaries for the last three years:
INSTALLED CAPACITY IN COLOMBIA (MW)(1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(MW) |
| ||||
Emgesa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guavio (reservoir) |
|
1,213 |
|
1,213 |
|
1,213 |
|
Cadena Nueva (reservoir/pass-through) (2) |
|
601 |
|
601 |
|
601 |
|
Betania (reservoir) |
|
541 |
|
541 |
|
541 |
|
Termozipa (steam turbine/coal) |
|
236 |
|
236 |
|
236 |
|
Cartagena (steam turbine/natural gas + diesel oil) |
|
208 |
|
208 |
|
208 |
|
Minor Plants (pass-through) (3) |
|
96 |
|
96 |
|
116 |
|
Total |
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,914 |
|
(1) The figure includes the capacity used for power plant consumption.
(2) Includes two power plants named La Guaca and Paraiso.
(3) As of December 31, 2010 Emgesa owned and operated six minor plants: Charquito, El Limonar, La Tinta, Tequendama, La Junca and San Antonio.
Approximately 85% of our installed capacity in Colombia is hydroelectric. As a result, our physical generation depends on the reservoir levels and rainfalls. Our generation market share in Colombia was 23.7% in 2008, 22.6% in 2009 and 19.8% in 2010. In addition to hydrological conditions, the amount of generation depends on our commercial strategy. Companies are free to offer their electricity at prices driven by market conditions and are dispatched by a centralized operating entity to generate according to the prices offered, as opposed to being dispatched according to the operating costs, as in other countries in which we operate.
During 2010, thermal generation represented 9.1% of total generation and hydroelectric generation represented the remaining 90.9% of our generation in Colombia. During the second half of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, there were very dry hydrological conditions in the Colombian system due to the El Niño phenomenon, which caused less hydroelectric generation in the region, contrary to Chilean and Peruvian regions. For Emgesas hydro units in the Guavio River and Magdalena River (Betania unit), the flow remained critically low until October 2010. The average annual percentage of historical average flow for 2010 was 76% and 82% for the Guavio and Magdalena Rivers respectively, as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
Jan |
|
Feb |
|
Mar |
|
Apr |
|
May |
|
Jun |
|
Jul |
|
Aug |
|
Sep |
|
Oct |
|
Nov |
|
Dec |
|
Total |
|
Guavio River GWh |
|
2010 |
|
62 |
|
81 |
|
184 |
|
429 |
|
647 |
|
730 |
|
793 |
|
469 |
|
311 |
|
288 |
|
435 |
|
267 |
|
4,696 |
|
|
Average |
|
134 |
|
131 |
|
219 |
|
466 |
|
771 |
|
979 |
|
1056 |
|
799 |
|
533 |
|
470 |
|
372 |
|
228 |
|
6,158 |
| |
|
% |
|
73 |
% |
57 |
% |
44 |
% |
46 |
% |
62 |
% |
84 |
% |
75 |
% |
59 |
% |
58 |
% |
61 |
% |
117 |
% |
117 |
% |
76 |
% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magdalena River GWh |
|
2010 |
|
57 |
|
67 |
|
87 |
|
208 |
|
223 |
|
213 |
|
249 |
|
149 |
|
105 |
|
119 |
|
248 |
|
201 |
|
1,927 |
|
|
Average |
|
132 |
|
125 |
|
162 |
|
204 |
|
235 |
|
261 |
|
286 |
|
221 |
|
157 |
|
176 |
|
198 |
|
178 |
|
2,337 |
| |
|
% |
|
43 |
% |
53 |
% |
54 |
% |
102 |
% |
95 |
% |
82 |
% |
87 |
% |
67 |
% |
67 |
% |
68 |
% |
126 |
% |
113 |
% |
82 |
% |
Emgesa reduced its hydro generation by 1,447 GWh as compared with the 2009 generation and by 2,150 GWh when compared to the 2008 figure. Part of this decrease was replaced by thermal generation (57 GWh more than 2009, and 528 GWh more than 2008), as shown in the following table:
HYDRO/THERMAL GENERATION IN COLOMBIA (GWh) (1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Hydroelectric generation |
|
12,403 |
|
96.1 |
|
11,700 |
|
92.3 |
|
10,253 |
|
90.9 |
|
Thermal generation |
|
503 |
|
3.9 |
|
974 |
|
7.7 |
|
1,030 |
|
9.1 |
|
Total generation |
|
12,905 |
|
100.0 |
|
12,674 |
|
100.0 |
|
11,283 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Generation minus power plant own consumption and technical losses.
During 2010, the Cartagena and Termozipa power plants have been operated intensively with natural gas and coal, respectively, as a result of the El Niño phenomenon.
The following table sets forth the levels of electricity production and purchases for our Colombian subsidiaries for the past three years:
PHYSICAL PRODUCTION AND PURCHASES IN COLOMBIA (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Electricity production |
|
12,905 |
|
78.1 |
|
12,674 |
|
74.7 |
|
11,283 |
|
75.4 |
|
Electricity purchases |
|
3,611 |
|
21.9 |
|
4,284 |
|
25.3 |
|
3,678 |
|
24.6 |
|
Total (1) |
|
16,517 |
|
100.0 |
|
16,958 |
|
100.0 |
|
14,961 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Electricity generation plus electricity purchases differ from electricity sales due to transmission losses, as power plant consumption and technical losses have already been deducted.
The only interconnected electricity system in Colombia is the Sistema Interconectado Nacional the Colombian NIS. Electricity demand in the Colombian NIS increased 2.6% during 2010. Total electricity consumption was: 53,870 GWh in 2008, 54,679 GWh in 2009 and 56,099 GWh in 2010.
The demand in Colombias electricity market has been affected by the agreement on International Transactions of Energy governing the interconnection with Ecuadors electricity system, which began operations in 2003. During 2010 physical sales to Ecuador were 798 GWh, 279 GWh lower than the 1,077 GWh sold in 2009, due to the dry conditions in Colombia that forced the authorities to limit exports temporarily. Energy imports from Ecuador to Colombia were 10 GWh in 2010 and 16 GWh in 2009.
The distribution of our physical sales in Colombia, in terms of customer segment, is shown in the following table:
PHYSICAL SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN COLOMBIA (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of Sales |
|
Contracted sales |
|
11,169 |
|
68.2 |
|
11,960 |
|
71.2 |
|
10,946 |
|
73.9 |
|
Non-contracted sales |
|
5,199 |
|
31.8 |
|
4,847 |
|
28.8 |
|
3,871 |
|
26.1 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
16,368 |
|
100.0 |
|
16,806 |
|
100.0 |
|
14,817 |
|
100.0 |
|
During 2010, Emgesa served an average of 739 contracts with unregulated customers and 11 distribution and trading companies. Our sales to the distribution company Codensa, an affiliated company because of control at the Enersis level, accounted for 39.2% of our total contracted sales in 2010. Physical sales to the five largest unregulated customers altogether reached 5.6% of total contracted sales.
The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our six largest distribution customers in Colombia for the last three years:
MAIN DISTRIBUTION AND TRADING CUSTOMERS IN COLOMBIA (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Codensa (1) |
|
3,784 |
|
33.9 |
|
4,697 |
|
39.3 |
|
4,296 |
|
39.2 |
|
Enertolima |
|
150 |
|
1.3 |
|
471 |
|
3.9 |
|
501 |
|
4.6 |
|
Electrocosta |
|
79 |
|
0.7 |
|
517 |
|
4.3 |
|
555 |
|
5.1 |
|
Electricaribe |
|
1,194 |
|
10.7 |
|
954 |
|
8.0 |
|
352 |
|
3.2 |
|
EPM |
|
1,455 |
|
13.0 |
|
720 |
|
6.0 |
|
1,716 |
|
15.7 |
|
Meta |
|
624 |
|
5.6 |
|
163 |
|
1.4 |
|
175 |
|
1.6 |
|
Total sales to our largest distribution customers |
|
7,286 |
|
65.2 |
|
7,523 |
|
62.9 |
|
7,595 |
|
69.4 |
|
(1) A subsidiary of Enersis.
Our most important competitors in Colombia include the following state-owned companies: Empresas Públicas de Medellín (with an installed capacity of 2,600 MW), Isagen (with an installed capacity of 2,106 MW), and Gecelca (with an installed capacity of 1,201 MW). We also compete with the following private sector companies in Colombia: Chivor (1,000 MW), which is owned by Gener, (100% as of December 2010); Colinversiones, with an installed capacity of 1,459 MW, which includes Termoflores with an installed capacity of 160 MW (281 MW less than the installed capacity registered in 2009, due to the temporary retirement of the Flores 2 and 3 units for the conversion to combined cycle; the incorporation of the new Flores IV unit is expected during the first quarter of 2011); Merieléctrica, with an installed capacity of 169 MW; and Epsa, with an installed capacity of 1,111 MW.
Operations in Peru
Through our subsidiary Edegel, we operate a total of nine generation facilities in Peru, with a total installed capacity of 1,668 MW, as of December 2010. Edegel owns seven hydroelectric power plants, with a total installed capacity of 746 MW, two of which are located 280 kilometers from Lima and five of which are located approximately 50 kilometers from Lima. The company has two thermal plants, which represent the remaining 922 MW of total installed capacity. Our hydroelectric and thermal generation plants in Peru represent 25.8% of the countrys total electricity generation capacity according to the information reported in December 2010 by the Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería, Supervisory Entity of the Investment on Energy and Mining (Osinergmin).
The following chart sets forth the installed capacity of Edegel:
INSTALLED CAPACITY IN PERU (MW)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edegel S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huinco (hydroelectric) |
|
247 |
|
247 |
|
247 |
|
Matucana (hydroelectric) |
|
129 |
|
129 |
|
129 |
|
Callahuanca (hydroelectric) |
|
80 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
|
Moyopampa (hydroelectric)(1) |
|
65 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
|
Huampani (hydroelectric) |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
Yanango (hydroelectric) |
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
Chimay (hydroelectric) |
|
151 |
|
151 |
|
151 |
|
Santa Rosa (thermal) (2)(3) |
|
229 |
|
430 |
|
429 |
|
Ventanilla (thermal) |
|
493 |
|
493 |
|
493 |
|
Total |
|
1,467 |
|
1,667 |
|
1,668 |
|
(1) During 2010, Moyopampas installed capacity increased by 1 MW, due to the result of a capacity test held during this period.
(2) During 2009, Santa Rosa increased its installed capacity due to the incorporation of Unit TG8, which started operations in September 2009 with 193 MW and with an additional 7 MW since November 2009 (200 MW in total).
(3) During 2010, Santa Rosas installed capacity decreased by 1 MW, due to the result of a capacity test held during this period.
Our generation market share was 26.1% of total electricity production in Peru in 2010.
HYDRO/THERMAL GENERATION IN PERU (GWh)(1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Hydroelectric generation |
|
4,189 |
|
51.7 |
|
4,564 |
|
55.9 |
|
4,405 |
|
52.0 |
|
Thermal generation |
|
3,913 |
|
48.3 |
|
3,599 |
|
44.1 |
|
4,061 |
|
48.0 |
|
Total generation |
|
8,102 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,163 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,466 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Generation minus power plant own consumption and technical losses.
Hydrological generation represented 52.0% of Edegels total production in 2010. Hydro generation decreased by 159 GWh or 3.5%, compared with 2009 generation, due to the rainy conditions prevailing during 2009. For Edegel, the flow of the rivers during 2009 in the Rimac basin was one of the highest since 1965. This 2010 reduction was offset by an increase of 463 GWh of thermal generation in 2010, explained by the incorporation of Santa Rosas Unit TG8.
The flow of the Rimac River for the years 2009 and 2010, compared with the historical average, is shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
Jan |
|
Feb |
|
Mar |
|
Apr |
|
May |
|
Jun |
|
Jul |
|
Aug |
|
Sep |
|
Oct |
|
Nov |
|
Dec |
|
Average |
|
Rimac River m3/s |
|
2009 |
|
42 |
|
78 |
|
70 |
|
52 |
|
26 |
|
17 |
|
14 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
17 |
|
37 |
|
55 |
|
36 |
|
|
Average |
|
42 |
|
57 |
|
60 |
|
40 |
|
21 |
|
15 |
|
12 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
13 |
|
17 |
|
27 |
|
27 |
| |
|
% |
|
102 |
% |
136 |
% |
117 |
% |
129 |
% |
121 |
% |
114 |
% |
118 |
% |
111 |
% |
106 |
% |
128 |
% |
220 |
% |
208 |
% |
133 |
% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rimac River m3/s |
|
2010 |
|
65 |
|
55 |
|
62 |
|
43 |
|
23 |
|
17 |
|
14 |
|
13 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
44 |
|
31 |
|
|
Average |
|
42 |
|
57 |
|
60 |
|
40 |
|
21 |
|
15 |
|
12 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
13 |
|
17 |
|
27 |
|
27 |
| |
|
% |
|
157 |
% |
95 |
% |
104 |
% |
107 |
% |
107 |
% |
114 |
% |
120 |
% |
126 |
% |
105 |
% |
93 |
% |
78 |
% |
165 |
% |
115 |
% |
The portion of electricity supplied by Edegels own generation was 96.5% of total physical sales, requiring only a small amount of purchases to satisfy contractual obligations to customers.
Edegel has gas supply, transportation and distribution contracts for its Ventanilla and Santa Rosa facilities. During 2007, the gas pipeline Camisea-Lima, owned by TGP, reached its full capacity. However, in May 2008, TGP started implementing restrictions on the gas transfer through the pipeline. In order to guarantee the transportation capacity for its natural gas demand, Edegel modified its agreements during 2007 and 2008, shifting from interruptible to firm mode, with a capacity of 1.5 million m3/d (from August 2008 to July 2009) and 2.7 million m3/d (from August 2009 to July 2019). Thus, Edegel expects it will have enough capacity for the combined cycle Ventanilla plant and part of Santa Rosa. In addition, in 2009 Edegel extended the contract for transportation and distribution from August 2019 to 2025 at a level of 2.1 million m3/d.
In August 2010, TGP awarded 0.5 million m3/d in firm transport capacity to Edegel from August 2010 until the end of 2019, in the TGP 14th open season.
In August 2010, the authority published a regulation that enables the secondary market for transport and supply of natural gas.
PHYSICAL GENERATION AND PURCHASES IN PERU (GWh) (1)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
(GWh) |
|
% |
|
Electricity generation |
|
8,102 |
|
93.9 |
|
8,163 |
|
96.0 |
|
8,466 |
|
96.5 |
|
Electricity purchases |
|
525 |
|
6.1 |
|
337 |
|
4.0 |
|
305 |
|
3.5 |
|
Total(1) |
|
8,627 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,499 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,771 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Electricity generation plus electricity purchases differ from electricity sales due to transmission losses, as power plant consumption and technical losses have already been deducted.
Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional, or the SINAC, is the only interconnected system in Peru. Electricity sales in the SINAC increased 8.5% during 2010 compared to 2009, reaching total annual sales of 29,553 GWh.
The distribution of Edegels physical sales, in terms of customer segment, is shown in the following table:
PHYSICAL SALES PER CUSTOMER SEGMENT IN PERU (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Sales |
|
% of |
|
Contracted sales (1) |
|
8,225 |
|
97.2 |
|
7,565 |
|
90.9 |
|
7,550 |
|
87.8 |
|
Non-contracted sales |
|
235 |
|
2.8 |
|
755 |
|
9.1 |
|
1,049 |
|
12.2 |
|
Total electricity sales |
|
8,461 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,321 |
|
100.0 |
|
8,598 |
|
100.0 |
|
(1) Includes sales to distributors without contracts.
Edegels physical sales in 2010 increased 3.3% compared with 2009. Sales in the spot market increased 38.8% due to the increase in generation and contracted sales remained similar to the values evidenced for 2009. During 2010, Edegel had nine regulated customers. Edegel has had contracts since 1997 with Luz del Sur and Edelnor. Edegel also won the bids launched by other distributors during 2006 and 2007. The company has ten unregulated customers. Sales to unregulated customers represented 27.3% of Edegels total contracted sales in 2010, compared to 46.3% in 2009, due to the expiration of the contract with Electroperú in September 2009.
During 2010, there were six long-term bids for the supply of various distributors in Peru. Those contracts will be dispatched as of 2013 and 2014 with a duration between 8 and 12 years. The energy required varies by year: 36 TWh for 2013, 194 TWh between 2014 and 2021, 120 TWh for 2022 and 2023 and 4 TWh for 2024 and 2025. Edegel allocated 4.9 TWh between 2014 and 2021, 4.4 TWh for 2022 and 2023, and 3.4 TWh for 2024 and 2025 in the Edelnor process.
Additionally in that bid, Edegel allocated between 250 and 892 GWh between 2011 and 2013 in medium-term bids with Luz del Sur, Seal and Edelnor.
The following table sets forth our sales by volume to our largest customers in Peru for each of the periods indicated:
MAIN CUSTOMERS IN PERU (GWh)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Contracted |
|
% of |
|
Distribution companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edelnor (Regulated) (1) |
|
1,693 |
|
20.6 |
|
2,663 |
|
35.2 |
|
4,072 |
|
53.9 |
|
Luz del Sur (Regulated) (1) |
|
1,346 |
|
16.4 |
|
949 |
|
12.5 |
|
917 |
|
12.1 |
|
Hidrandina |
|
58 |
|
0.7 |
|
60 |
|
0.8 |
|
59 |
|
0.8 |
|
Electronoroeste |
|
49 |
|
0.6 |
|
50 |
|
0.7 |
|
55 |
|
0.7 |
|
Electronorte |
|
50 |
|
0.6 |
|
54 |
|
0.7 |
|
57 |
|
0.8 |
|
Electrosur |
|
30 |
|
0.4 |
|
32 |
|
0.4 |
|
33 |
|
0.4 |
|
Total sales to our largest distribution companies |
|
3,226 |
|
39.2 |
|
3,808 |
|
50.3 |
|
5,194 |
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregulated customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ElectroPerú (2) |
|
2,775 |
|
33.7 |
|
1,821 |
|
24.1 |
|
0 |
|
0.0 |
|
Antamina |
|
644 |
|
7.8 |
|
652 |
|
8.6 |
|
668 |
|
8.9 |
|
Refinería |
|
635 |
|
7.7 |
|
614 |
|
8.1 |
|
974 |
|
12.9 |
|
Siderperú |
|
334 |
|
4.1 |
|
253 |
|
3.3 |
|
263 |
|
3.5 |
|
Total sales to our largest unregulated companies |
|
4,387 |
|
53.3 |
|
3,339 |
|
44.1 |
|
1,905 |
|
25.2 |
|
Total sales to our largest customers |
|
7,613 |
|
92.6 |
|
7,147 |
|
94.5 |
|
7,099 |
|
94.0 |
|
(1) The figures for Edelnor and Luz del Sur represent sales under bilateral contracts with Edegel only, and not withdrawals of these companies assigned to Edegel for non contract-related consumption. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, the energy sold to these distributors includes the amount won by Edegel in the bids realized since 2006. Edelnor is a subsidiary of our parent company Enersis.
(2) Since 2006, ElectroPerú has been a customer of Edegel due to a merger with Etevensa. The contract with ElectroPerú expired in September 2009.
Our most important competitors in Peru are Enersur (GDF-Suez group, with an installed capacity of 1,038 MW); ElectroPerú (state-owned competitor, with an installed capacity of 989 MW); Egenor (Duke Energy Group, with an installed capacity of 650 MW); and Kallpa (Inkia Energy group, with an installed capacity of 566 MW).
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Chile
Industry Structure
The electricity industry in Chile is divided into three business segments: generation, transmission and distribution. The generation segment consists of companies that produce electricity. They sell their production to distribution companies, unregulated customers, or to other generation companies. The transmission segment consists of companies that transmit the electricity produced by generation companies through high voltage lines over 23 kV. Finally, the distribution segment is defined for regulatory purposes to include all electricity supply to end users at a voltage no higher than 23 kV.
The electricity sector in Chile is regulated pursuant to Decree with force of Law No. 4 of 2006, as amended, known as the Chilean Electricity Law.
In Chile there are four separate interconnected electricity systems. The main systems that cover the most populated areas of Chile are the Sistema Interconectado Central, or SIC, which services the central and south central part of the territory, where 93% of the Chilean population lives, and the Sistema Interconectado del Norte Grande, or SING, which operates in the northern part of the country, where most of the mining industry is located. According to the 2002 census, 6% of the Chilean population lived in the territory serviced by the SING. In addition to the SIC and the SING, there are two isolated systems in southern Chile that provide electricity in remote areas, where no more than 1% of the population lives. The operation of electricity generation companies in each of the two major interconnected electricity systems is coordinated by their respective dispatch center, or CDEC, an autonomous entity that involves industry groups, transmission companies and large customers. CDECs coordinate the operation of their system as efficient markets for the sale of electricity, in which the lowest marginal cost producer is usually used to satisfy demand at any moment in time. As a result, at any specific level of demand, the appropriate supply will be provided at the lowest possible cost of production available in the system.
Chilean Electricity Law
General
The goal of the Chilean Electricity Law is to provide incentives to maximize efficiency and to provide a simplified regulatory scheme and tariff-setting process which limits the discretionary role of the government by establishing objective criteria for setting prices. The expected result is an economically efficient allocation of resources. The regulatory system is designed to provide a competitive rate of return on investment to stimulate private investment, while ensuring the availability of electricity service to all who request it.
Three governmental entities have primary responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of the Chilean Electricity Law: the Ministry of Energy, the Chilean National Energy Commission (CNE) and Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF). The Ministry of Energy, created in 2009, develops and coordinates plans, policies and standards for the proper operation of the sector, approves tariffs and node prices set by the CNE, and regulates the granting of concessions to electricity generation, transmission and distribution companies. CNE is the technical entity in charge of defining prices, technical standards and regulatory requirements. SEF monitors the proper operation of electricity, gas and fuel sectors in compliance with the law in terms of safety, quality, and technical standards. There are also other entities related to the energy sector: the Chilean Nuclear Energy Committee in charge of research, development, use and control of nuclear energy, and the Chilean Energy Efficiency Agency, in charge of promoting energy efficiency.
In each transmission system, the pertinent CDEC coordinates the operations of generation companies, in order to minimize the operating costs in the electricity system and monitor the quality of service provided by the generation and transmission companies. Generation companies satisfy their contractual sales requirements with dispatched electricity, whether produced by them or purchased from other generation companies in the spot market.
Sales by Generation Companies to Unregulated Customers
Sales by generation companies may be made to final unregulated customers or to other generation companies under freely negotiated contracts. To balance their contractual obligations with their dispatch, generators have to trade deficit and surplus electricity at the spot market price, which is set hourly by each CDEC, based on the marginal cost of production of the next kWh to be dispatched.
Sales to Distribution Companies and Certain Regulated Customers
Regulated customers are those with a maximum consumption capacity not exceeding 0.5 MW. Customers between 0.5 and 2 MW may choose their status as regulated or unregulated. Customers with capacity needs over 2 MW are unregulated. Historically, sales to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers were made through contracts at regulated prices set by CNE (node prices) in effect at the relevant locations (or nodes) on the interconnected system through which such electricity was supplied. Nevertheless, since 2005 all new contracts between generation and distribution companies for the supply to regulated customers must arise from international bids which have a maximum offer energy price based on the average price paid by the unregulated customers at the time that the bid takes place, which is calculated twice a year by the CNE. If a first bid is unsuccessful, authorities may increase this maximum price by an additional 15%. The bids are awarded on a minimum price basis. The average prices associated with these bids are transferred directly to end users, replacing the
current regulated price regime. During the life of the contract, the energy and capacity prices are indexed according to formulas set forth in the bid documentation and linked to fuel, investment and other costs of energy generation. Under the bid system, all distribution companies have separate electricity contracts for their regulated and unregulated customers from 2010 onwards.
Sales of Capacity to Other Generation Companies
Each CDEC determines a firm capacity for each power plant on an annual basis. Firm capacity is the highest capacity which a generator may supply to the system at certain peak hours, taking into consideration statistical information regarding the time it is out of service for maintenance and extremely dry conditions for the operation of hydroelectric plants.
A generation company may be required to purchase or sell capacity in the spot market, depending upon its contractual requirements in relation to the amount of electricity to be dispatched from such company and to its firm capacity.
Transmission
Since transmission assets are built pursuant to concessions granted by the government, the law requires a company to operate on an open access basis, in which users may obtain access to the system by contributing towards the costs of operating, maintaining and, if necessary, expanding the system.
Concessions
The law permits generation activity without a concession. However, companies may apply for a concession to facilitate access to third-party properties. Third-party property owners are entitled to compensation, which may be agreed to by the parties or, if there is no agreement, it may be determined by an administrative proceeding that may be appealed in the Chilean courts.
Fines and Compensations
If a rationing decree is enacted in response to prolonged periods of electricity shortages, severe penalties may be imposed on generation companies that contravene the decree. A severe drought is not considered a force majeure event.
Generation companies may also be required to pay fines to the regulatory authorities, related to system blackouts due to any generators operational mistake, including failures related to the coordination duties of all system agents as well as to make compensatory payments to electricity consumers affected by shortages of electricity. If generation companies cannot satisfy their contractual commitments to deliver electricity during periods when a rationing decree is in effect and there is no energy available to purchase in the system, the generation company must compensate the customers at the failure cost determined by the authority in each tariff setting.
Environmental Regulation
The Chilean Constitution grants all citizens the right to live in a pollution-free environment. It further provides that other constitutional rights may be limited in order to protect the environment. Chile has numerous laws, regulations, decrees and municipal ordinances that address environmental considerations. Among them are regulations relating to waste disposal (including the discharge of liquid industrial wastes), the establishment of industries in areas in which they may affect public health, and the protection of water for human consumption.
Environmental Law No. 19,300 was enacted in 1994 and implemented by several rules, such as the Environmental Impact Assessment System Rule issued in 1997 and modified in 2001. This law requires companies to conduct environmental impact study or declaration of any future generation or transmission projects.
In January 2010, Law No. 19,300 was modified by Law No. 20,417, which introduced changes in the environmental assessment process and in the public institutions involved in it. Consequently, the environmental assessment process is coordinated by the Environmental Assessment Service, and not by the Chilean Environmental Commission, or Conama, which was repealed, as of October 1, 2010. Endesa Chiles subsidiaries apply the guidelines of the new law when analyzing the development of future projects.
On April 1, 2008, Law No. 20,257 was enacted, and amended the General Services Law. The purpose of the amendment is to promote the use of Non-Conventional Renewable Energy (NCRE). This law defines the different types of technologies considered as NCRE, and establishes the obligation of generators between 2010 and 2014, to supply at least 5% of the total energy contracted as of August 31, 2007, to be of such type, and to progressively increase this percentage 0.5 percentage points annually up to 10% as of 2024. Currently, our power plants recognized as NCRE generators are Palmucho, Canela wind farms and Ojos de Agua. Additionally, the law sets forth fines for the generators that do not comply with this obligation. Endesa Chile fully complied with this obligation during 2010 and generated excess energy with NCRE, with the capacity to sell the surplus to other generators. The additional cost of generating with NCRE is being charged as a pass-through in the new contracts, thus eliminating an impact to our revenues.
During 2010, the government has been working on a new regulation for thermal plants emissions, which is expected to take effect during 2011. This rule will regulate emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and mercury, both for existing and new power plants. This rule provides a transition period for existing plants, in order to have time to make the required investments in order to comply with such regulations. Also, a quality standard is being developed that regulates fine particulate matter (PM 2.5).
Water rights
Endesa Chile owns unconditional, absolute and perpetual property water rights granted by the Chilean Water Authority. Chilean generation companies must pay an annual fee for unused water rights. License fees already paid may be recovered through monthly tax credits commencing on the start-up date of the project associated with the water right considered. The maximum license fees to be recovered are those paid during the 8 years before the start-up date. As of the date of this report, Endesa Chile has not recovered any license fees already paid. During 2010, we paid Ch$ 2,700 million for 2009 water rights located in the SIC area. This amount may vary in the future according to the actual water rights we may hold each year. Endesa Chile continuously analyzes which water rights it will maintain, disregard or acquire. We estimate that in 2011 we will pay fees for an aggregate of Ch$ 2,886 million. Thereafter, the water rights law requires an annual fee that will be doubled and will thereafter remain flat for five years, at which point the license fee will be doubled once again. In the case of water rights located in the extreme south of Chile, outside the area comprised by the SIC, the license fees will be paid starting as of January 1, 2012, even though, Endesa Chile does not and will not have any water rights in that area.
Argentina
Introduction
Law No. 15,336 of 1960 and Law No. 24,065 of 1992 (together, the Argentine Electricity Act) set the regulatory framework for the electricity sector.
Under the Argentine Electricity Act, the Federal Government:
· Divided the electricity industry into three business segments: generation, transmission and distribution, enabling the electricity market development under conditions of free competition for generation with reduced tariffs, establishing requirements regarding quality standards, and restricting ownership concentration;
· Created the Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista (Wholesale Electricity Market) or MEM where four categories of agents (generators, transmitters, distributors and large customers) are allowed to buy and sell electricity as well as related products;
· Imposed the Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico (Administrative Company for the Wholesale Electricity Market) or CAMMESA, responsible for the dispatch coordination, the administration of the agents transactions in the MEM and the calculation of spot prices; and
· Created the Ente Nacional Regulador de la Electricidad (Electricity National Regulatory Agency) or ENRE, in charge of regulating public service activities in the electricity sector and imposing jurisdictional decisions.
The Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services, through the Secretariat of Energy, is primarily responsible for the implementation of the Argentine Electricity Act. Among the main tasks, the Secretariat regulates the system dispatch and the activities in the MEM, and grants the concessions or authorization for each activity in the electricity sector. The Secretariat of Energy is also responsible for policy setting in the oil and natural gas sector, with its direct impact on thermal generators and the electricity sector.
Industry structure
The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis, with independent generators selling their output on the MEMs spot market or through private contracts to purchasers on the MEMs contract market or to CAMMESA through special transactions like contracts under Resolutions SE No. 220/2007 and No. 724/2008.
Transmission works under monopoly conditions and is comprised of several companies to whom the Federal Government grants concessions. One concessionaire operates and maintains the highest voltage facilities and eight concessionaires operate and maintain high and medium voltage facilities, to which generation plants, distribution systems and large customers are connected. The international interconnected transmission systems also require concessions granted by the Secretariat of Energy. Transmission companies are authorized to charge different tolls for their services.
Distribution is a public service that works under monopoly conditions and is provided by companies who have also been granted concessions. Distribution companies have the obligation to make electricity available to end users within a specific concession area, regardless of whether the customer has a contract with the distributor or directly with a generator. Accordingly, these companies have regulated tariffs and are subject to quality service specifications. Distribution companies may obtain electricity either in the MEMs spot market, at a price called seasonal price, or in the MEMs term market through private contracts with generators. The seasonal price, defined by the Secretariat of Energy, is the cap for the costs of electricity bought by distributors and passed through to regulated customers.
There are three electricity distribution areas subject to federal concessions. The concessionaires are Edelap, Edesur and Edenor, which are located in the cities of La Plata (Edelap) and Buenos Aires and Greater Buenos Aires area (Edesur, which is a subsidiary of Enersis). Edelap and Edenor are unrelated distribution companies. The local distribution areas are subject to concessions granted by the provincial or municipal authorities. However, all distribution companies acting in the MEM must operate under its rules.
Regulated customers are supplied by distributors at regulated tariffs, unless they have a minimum capacity demand of 30 kW, in which case they can choose to contract their supply directly from generators in the MEM´s spot market, becoming large customers who may freely negotiate their prices with generating companies.
Traders are also authorized to act as participants in the MEM. They buy and sell energy and related products from and for agents of the MEM, including electricity royalty payments received by the provinces.
No generator, distributor, large user, nor any company controlled by any of these or controlling the same, may be either owner or a major shareholder of a transmission company or of its controlling companies. At the same time, transmission companies are prohibited from generating, distributing, purchasing and/or selling electricity. Distribution companies are prohibited from owning generation units.
Dispatch and Pricing
CAMMESA controls the coordination of dispatch operations, the spot prices calculation and the administration of the MEMs economic transactions. CAMMESA is also obliged to comply with special instructions given by the Secretariat of Energy in order to enter into transactions with certain generators in order to buy electricity. All generators that are MEM agents have to be connected to the Sistema Argentino de Interconexión (Argentine Interconnected System) or Argentine NIS and are obliged to comply with the dispatch order to generate and deliver energy to the Argentine NIS, in order to be sold in the spot market or in the term market. Distribution companies, traders and large users that have entered into private supply contracts with generation companies, pay the contractual price directly to the generator and also pay a toll to the transmission and/or distribution company for the use of their systems.
The spot price is calculated on an hourly basis by CAMMESA and must reflect the cost of the marginal kW to be dispatched in the Argentine NIS and is paid to generators and sellers of energy at the spot market. The Argentine Electricity Act sets that electricity prices in the spot market are determined on a marginal cost basis. Since 2002, the Secretariat of Energy started to modify several criteria regarding the spot prices and imposed, among other restrictions, caps for the spot prices to be paid to generators and only recognized for calculation purposes the natural gas costs established by the Federal Government, even though additional costs are collected by the market and paid to the generator.
In order to stabilize the prices for distribution tariffs, the market has a seasonal price as the energy price to be paid by distributors for their purchases of electricity traded in the spot market. It is a fixed price determined every six months by the Secretariat of Energy after CAMMESA recommends the seasonal price level for the next period according to its estimated spot price, which is based on its evaluation of the expected supply, demand and available capacity, as well as other factors. The seasonal price is maintained for at least 90 days. Since 2002, the Secretariat of Energy has been approving seasonal prices lower than those recommended by CAMMESA.
Regulatory Developments: the industry after the Public Emergency Law
General
Law No. 25,561, the Public Emergency Law, was enacted in 2002 to manage the public crisis which began that year. It forced the renegotiation of public service contracts (such as electricity transmission and distribution concession contracts) and imposed the conversion of dollar denominated obligations into Argentine pesos at a pegged rate of Ar$ 1 per $ 1. It also empowered the Federal Government to implement additional monetary, financial and exchange measures to overcome the economic crisis in the medium term. These measures have been periodically extended. In fact, Law No. 26,563, enacted in December 2009, extended the measures until December 31, 2011.
The Secretariat of Energy introduced several regulatory measures aimed to correct the effects of the devaluation into the MEMs costs and prices and to reduce the price to be paid by the end users.
Generation
The mandatory conversion of transmission and distribution tariffs from dollars to Argentine pesos at the pegged rate of Ar$ 1 per $ 1 as of 2002, when the market exchange rate was approximately Ar$ 3 per $ 1, and the regulatory measures to cap and reduce the spot and seasonal prices hindered the pass through of generation variable costs into the tariffs to end users.
Resolution SE No. 240/2003 changed the way to fix spot prices, decoupling the spot price calculation from the marginal costs of operation. Until this resolution, spot prices on the MEM were typically fixed by units operating with natural gas during the warm season (from September through April) and units operating with fuel/diesel in the winter (May-August). Then, due to restrictions on natural gas supply, winter prices were higher, and related to imported fuels priced in dollars. Resolution SE No. 240/2003 seeks to avoid the pegged price indexation to the dollar and, although generation dispatch is still based on actual fuels used, the calculation of the spot price under the Resolution is defined as if all dispatched generation units did not have the existing restrictions on natural gas supply. Water value is not considered if its opportunity cost is higher than the cost of generating with natural gas. The resolution also set a cap on the spot price at 120 Ar$/MWh, which was still valid during 2010. The real variable costs of thermal units burning liquid fuels were paid by CAMMESA through the Transitory Additional Dispatch Cost (Sobrecosto transitorio de despacho, STD) plus a margin of 2.5 Ar$/MWh, according to the Notes SE 6,866 of 2009 and 6,169 of 2010, valid from May 2010 until December 2011.
The government avoided the increase in electricity tariffs to end users and seasonal prices were maintained substantially fixed in Argentine pesos, although gas producers received price revisions by the authority, recovering part of the value that they lost with the devaluation. In this scenario, CAMMESA sells energy to distributors who pay seasonal prices, and buys energy from generators at spot prices that recognize rising gas prices and at a contractual prices defined by the instructions of the Secretariat of Energy. To overcome this imbalance, the authority through Resolution SE N° 406/2003 only allows payments to generators for amounts collected from the purchasers in the spot market. This Resolution set a priority of payment for different services: capacity payment, fuel cost and energy sales margin, among others. CAMMESA accumulates debt with generators, and the system gives an incorrect price signal to the agents by not encouraging savings in electricity consumption or investments to satisfy the growth in electricity demand, including investments in transmission capacity.
Additionally, generators suffer a reduction of estimated income from contract prices because they are reduced as a consequence of the spot price level.
In order to enhance the energy supply, the Secretariat of Energy created different schemes to sell more reliable energy. Resolution 1,281/2006 created the Energy Plus Service, which is the offer of new electricity capacity to supply the growth in electricity demand, over the Base Demand, which was the demand for electricity in 2005. The Energy Plus Service is supplied by generators that install new capacity or that offer existing generation capacity not connected to the NIS before. All large customers that, as of November 1, 2006, had a higher demand than their Base Demand, had to contract excess
demand with the Energy Plus Service. The consumption that exceeded the Base Demand without a supply contract should pay additional amounts for the surplus energy. The price of the contracts for Energy Plus Service have to be approved by the relevant authorities. Consumption of unregulated customers that could not be secured by an Energy Plus Service contract could request CAMMESA to conduct an auction to satisfy their demand.
Resolutions SE No. 220/2007 and No. 724/2008 give thermal generators the opportunity to reduce some of the adverse effects of Resolution SE No. 406/2003 by entering into MEM Supply Commitment Contract or CCAM. Generators can perform maintenance or repowering investments to improve their units availability and add additional capacity to the system. After authorization, the generator can sign a CCAM at prices that permit the recovery of capital expenditures. Additionally, energy sales through a CCAM receive payment priority compared with spot energy sales (Res. No. 406/2003). Generators with a CCAM can supply energy to CAMMESA for up to 36 months, renewable only for an additional period of six months.
During 2009, Resolution SE No. 762 created the Hydroelectric National Program to promote the construction of new hydro plants. The program enables authorized generators to subscribe energy supply contracts with CAMMESA for up to fifteen years at prices that allow for an investment payback.
The Federal Government has adopted several other measures to promote new investments, including; auctions to expand the capacity of natural gas transportation and of electricity transmission; the implementation of certain projects for the construction of power plants; the creation of fiduciary funds to finance these expansions; and the awarding of contracts with renewable energy, called GENREN program. For more details, refer to Environmental regulation below. Law No. 26,095 of 2006 created specific charges that must be paid by end users to finance new electricity and gas infrastructure projects. The Federal Government has also enacted some regulations to promote the rational and efficient use of electricity.
On November 25, 2010, the Secretariat of Energy signed an agreement with some generation companies, including Endesa Chiles subsidiaries, in order to: i) increase thermoelectric unit availability, increase energy and capacity prices; ii) develop new generation units through the contribution of outstanding debts of CAMMESA owed to the generation companies.
FONINVEMEM
Resolution SE No. 712/2004 created FONINVEMEM, a fund whose purpose is to increase electricity capacity/generation within the MEM. Pursuant to Resolution SE No. 406/2003, the Secretariat of Energy decided to pay the generators the spot prices up to the amount available at a stabilization fund, after collecting the funds from the purchasers in the spot market at seasonal prices, lower than spot prices for the same period. FONINVEMEM would receive the differences between spot prices and payments to sellers, according to Resolution SE No. 406/2003, from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006. CAMMESA was appointed to manage the FONINVEMEM.
Pursuant to Resolution SE No. 1,193/2005 all private generators in the MEM were called to participate in the construction, operation and maintenance of the electric energy generation plants to be built with the FONINVEMEM, consisting of two combined cycle generation plants of approximately 850 MW each, which were finished during 2010 as combined cycle plants. These power plants are powered by natural gas or alternative fuels.
Because of the insufficient resources to conclude the plants, Resolution SE No. 564/2007 gathered all of the MEMs private sector generators to commit to FONINVEMEM by including the differences between spot prices and payments made pursuant to Resolution SE No. 406/2003 for an extra period ending December 31, 2007.
Natural gas market
End customers demand for natural gas peaks during winters. In this season, there have been natural gas shortages to supply power plants for several years. In order to assure internal supply, thermal generators consume alternative fuels, such as diesel and fuel oil. Since 2002, the lack of investment in natural gas production forced the system to burn increasing amounts of liquid fuels. In 2004, the Argentine government entered into an agreement with Venezuela to guarantee fuel oil supply until 2010.
To improve the natural gas supply, the government has adopted different actions. Since 2004, local gas producers and the government have entered into various agreements to guarantee gas supply at rising prices. In July 2009, the last agreement was signed establishing a 30% increase in the natural gas tariff to power producers until December 2009. Additionally, in 2006, Argentina and Bolivia entered into a 20-year agreement under which Argentina has the right to receive
up to 28 million cubic meters daily of natural gas. During the winters of 2008, 2009 and 2010, various ships arrived at Bahía Blanca with LNG for the system.
An additional measure related to natural gas in recent years was the creation of the Electronic Gas Market (MEG). Through the MEG, the regulatory authorities increased the transparency of physical and commercial operations in the spot market.
Export and Import of Energy
In order to give priority to the internal market supply, the Secretariat of Energy adopted additional measures that restricted electricity and gas exports. Resolution SE No. 949/2004 established measures that allowed agents to export and import electricity under very restricted conditions. These measures prevented generators from satisfying their export commitments.
The Secretariat of Energy published Disposition No. 27/2004, together with related resolutions and decrees, which created a plan to ration natural gas exports and the use of transport capacity. These norms implied the beginning of restrictions for gas delivery to Chile and Brazil. These restrictions are expected to continue, especially considering that during 2010, Resolution Enargas No. 1410 was published, which modified the procedures for gas dispatch starting in October 2010. According to that resolution, the priority of gas dispatch is as follows: i) residential and commercial users; ii) the Compressed Natural Gas market; iii) large customers; iv) thermal units; and v) exports.
Environmental Regulation
Electricity facilities are subject to federal and local environmental laws and regulations, including Law No. 24,051, or the Hazardous Waste Law, and its ancillary regulations.
Certain reporting and monitoring obligations and emission standards are imposed on the electricity sector. Failure to satisfy these requirements entitles the government to impose penalties, such as suspension of operations, which, in case of public services, could result in the cancellation of concessions.
Law No. 26,190, enacted in 2007, defined the use of renewable resources for electricity production as a national interest and set as a target, 8% market share for generation from renewable energies within a term of 10 years. During 2009, the government took actions to reach this objective, launching an international auction to promote the installation of up to 1,000 MW of renewable capacity, publishing Resolution No. 712/2009. This resolution created a mechanism to sell renewable energy through fifteen-year contracts under special price conditions. In June 2010, the GENREN program awarded a total of 895 MW, distributed in 754 MW of wind power; 110 MW of bio-fuels; 11 MW of mini-hydro; and 20 MW of solar units. The prices awarded vary from $ 150 MWh (for mini-hydro units) to $ 598 MWh (for solar units).
Brazil
Although we do not own any Brazilian subsidiaries, we do own equity investments through Endesa Brasil.
Industry Structure
Brazils electricity industry is organized into one large interconnected electricity system, which is known as the Sistema Interligado Nacional (the Brazilian NIS), which comprises most of the regions of Brazil, and several other small, isolated systems.
Generation, transmission and distribution are legally separated activities in Brazil. According to the specifications set forth in Law No. 9,427/96, unregulated consumers in Brazil are currently those customers who: (i) demand at least 3,000 kW and choose to contract the energy supply directly with generators or retailers; or (ii) demand capacity in the range of 500-3,000 kW and choose to contract the energy supply directly with alternative generators or traders.
The electricity industry in Brazil is regulated by the Federal Government, acting through the Ministry of Mines and Energy, or MME, which has exclusive authority over the electricity sector, and whose primary role is to establish the policies, guidelines and regulations for the sector. Regulatory policies are implemented by the Brazilian governmental agency for electric energy or ANEEL, whose main responsibilities include, among others: (1) supervision of the concessions for electricity sale, generation, transmission and distribution ; (2) enactment of regulations for the electricity sector;
(3) implementation and regulation of the exploitation of electricity resources, including the use of hydroelectricity; (4) promotion of a bidding process for new concessions; (5) resolution of administrative disputes between electricity sector agents; and (6) setting the criteria and methodology for determining distribution and transmission tariffs, as well as the approval of all the electricity tariffs.
Other regulatory authorities include: (i) the Brazilian Electricity System Operator (ONS), comprised of generation, transmission and distribution companies, and independent consumers, responsible for the coordination and control of the generation and transmission operations of the Brazilian NIS, subject to the ANEELs regulation and supervision; (ii) the Electricity Trading Board (CCEE), a non-profit company subject to authorization, inspection and regulation by ANEEL whose main purpose is to carry out the wholesale transactions and trading of electric power within the Brazilian NIS by registering the agreements resulting from market adjustments and whose agents are gathered into four categories: Generation, Distribution, Trading and Consumers ; and (iii) the National Energy Policy Council (CNPE), which is in charge of developing the national electricity policy.
Deregulation and Privatization
The Concessions Law (No. 8,987) and the Power Sector Law (No. 9,074), both enacted in 1995, intend to promote competition and attract private capital into the electricity sector. Since then, several assets owned by the Federal Government of Brazil and/or state governments have been privatized.
Independent Power Producers and Self-Producers
The Power Sector Law also introduced the concept of independent power producers, or IPPs, in order to open the electricity sector to private sector investment. IPPs are single agents, or agents acting in a consortium, who receive a concession, permit or authorization from the Brazilian government to produce electricity for sale on their own account.
The Concessions Law also provides that, upon receiving a concession, IPPs, self-producers, suppliers and consumers will have access to the distribution and transmission systems owned by other concessionaires, provided that they are reimbursed for their costs as determined by ANEEL.
Law No. 9,648/98 created the wholesale energy market, composed by the generation and distribution companies. According to this market regulation, the purchase and sale of electricity are freely negotiated.
Pursuant to Law No. 10,433/02, the wholesale energy market structure came to be closely regulated and monitored by ANEEL, which is also responsible for setting wholesale energy market governance rules including measures to stimulate permanent external investment.
Law No. 10,848/04 seeks to maintain public service for the production and distribution of electricity to consumers within each concession area, restructures the planning system, guarantees transparency in the auction and bidding process for public projects to mitigate the systemic risks, maintains centralized and coordinated operations of the energy system, grants universal use and access to electricity throughout Brazil, and modifies the bidding process of public service concessions.
Structure of the Electricity Sector
The market regulation established pursuant to Laws No. 10,847 and 10,848 seeks to provide cheaper tariffs for consumers and guarantees the expansion of the system, with the Power Research Company, (EPE), a governmental body, responsible for the planning of generation and transmission activities. This market regulation has defined an unregulated contracting environment and a regulated environment.
In the unregulated contracting environment, the conditions for purchasing energy are negotiable between suppliers and their customers. Regarding the regulated environment, where distribution companies operate, the purchase of energy must be conducted pursuant to a bidding process coordinated by ANEEL.
Pursuant to the market regulations, 100% of the energy demand from distributors must be satisfied through long-term contracts in advance of the expiration of current contracts in the regulated environment.
Another change imposed on the electricity sector is the separation of the bidding process for existing power and new power project. The government believes that a new power project needs more favorable contractual conditions such as
long term power purchase agreements (15 years for thermal and 30 years for hydro) and certain price levels for each technology. These agreements promote investment for the required expansion. On the other hand, existing power, which includes depreciated power plants, can sell their energy at lower prices in shorter term contracts.
Concessions
Companies or consortia that intend to build or operate hydroelectric generation facilities with a capacity exceeding 30 MW or transmission networks in Brazil have to resort to a public tender process. Concessions granted to the holder give the right to generate, transmit or distribute electricity, as the case may be, in a given concession area for a certain period of time.
Concessions are limited to 35 years for new generation concessions and to 30 years for new transmission or distribution concessions. Existing concessions may be renewed at the Brazilian governments discretion for a period equal to their initial term.
Electricity Sales
In the regulated market, electricity distribution companies buy the electricity through bids that are regulated by ANEEL and organized by CCEE. Distributors must buy electricity at public bids.
There are three types of regulated bids: new energy bids, existing energy bids and adjustment bids. The government also has the right to call special bids for renewable electricity (biomass, mini-hydro, solar and wind power). ANEEL and CCEE hold the bids annually. The contracting system is multilateral, with generating companies entering into contracts with all distributors who call for bids.
The unregulated market includes the sale of electricity between generation concessionaires, independent producers, self-producers, sellers of electricity, importers of electricity, unregulated and special consumers. It also includes contracts in place between generators and distributors until their expiration, at which point new contracts may be entered into under the terms of the new regulatory framework.
Hydroelectrical Energy Reassignment
Brazil created a special mechanism to share hydrological risk between all hydro generators, called Reallocating Energy Mechanism. Each hydro power plant has an assigned energy certificate which defines both the proportion of the total generated hydro energy owned by a plant and the maximum energy amount that the plant can sell through contracts. Differences between actual production and the assigned energy must be traded at a regulated fixed tariff (currently approximately $ 4/MWh).
Settlement Spot Price
The spot price is used to value the purchase and sale of electric power in the short term market. According to the law, CCEE is responsible for the setting of the electricity price in the spot market. This price is calculated on a marginal costs basis, modeling future operation conditions and setting a merit order curve with variable costs for thermal units and opportunity cost for hydroelectric plants, resulting in one price for each subsystem set for the week subsequent to the determination.
Fines applicable to agents in the electricity industry
Selling agents are responsible to the buying agent for payments if they are unable to satisfy their delivery obligations. ANEEL regulations set forth the fines applicable to electricity agents based on the nature and the materiality of the violation (including warnings, fines, temporary suspension of the right to participate in bids for new concessions, licenses or authorizations and forfeiture). For each violation, fines may be imposed for up to 2.0% of the concessionaires revenues arising from the sale of electricity and services provided (net of taxes) in the 12-month period immediately preceding any assessment notice.
ANEEL may also impose restrictions on the terms and conditions of agreements between related parties and, in extreme circumstances, terminate such agreements.
A party defaulting on payment of contributions to subsidy funds for the promotion and development of the electricity sector or any other payments due by virtue of the purchase of electricity in the ACR (regulated contract environment) or from Itaipú cannot use tariff adjustments (except for the extraordinary revision).
Incentives for the Development of Alternative Sources of Energy
Law No. 10,438/02 created certain incentive programs for the use of alternative sources in the generation of electricity (Proinfa). It assures the purchase of the electricity generated by Eletrobrás for a period of 20 years and financial support from the Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento, or BNDES. Other programs include a discount of up to 50% on the distribution or transmission tariffs and a special exception for the consumers with electricity demand in the range of 500-3,000 kW (special consumers) who decide to migrate to ACL (unregulated environment), provided that such consumers purchase electricity from generating companies using alternative sources of electricity.
Additionally, the government developed bidding processes for alternative energies (for example, the bidding process for wind projects that was held in December 2009, for 753 MW).
Public Bids
During 2010, there were four bidding processes for new generation projects, awarding 99 plants, for a total of 17,054 MW: 89 plants of NCRE for a total of 2,892 MW, three major hydroelectric plants for a total of 13,353 MW, and seven mid-size hydroelectric plants for a total of 809 MW.
Environmental Regulation
The Brazilian Constitution gives both the federal and state governments power to enact laws designed to protect the environment and to issue regulations under such laws. While the federal government has power to enact environmental regulations, state governments have the power to enact more stringent environmental regulations. Most of the environmental regulations in Brazil are at the state and local level rather than at the federal level.
Hydroelectric facilities are required to obtain concessions for water rights and environmental approvals. Thermal electricity generation, transmission and distribution companies are required to obtain environmental approvals from environmental regulatory authorities.
Colombia
In 1994, the Colombian Congress passed significant reforms to the public utilities industry. These reforms, contained in Law 142 of 1994 (LSPD), known as the Public Utility Services Law, and Law 143 of 1994, were the result of constitutional amendments made in 1991, and created the basic legal framework that currently governs the electricity sector in Colombia. The most significant reforms included the opening of the electricity industry to private sector participation, the functional segregation of the electricity sector into four distinct activities (namely generation, transmission, distribution and trading), the creation of an open and competitive wholesale electricity market, the regulation of transmission and distribution activities as regulated monopolies, and the adoption of universal access principles applicable to transmission and distribution networks.
Utility companies are required to ensure continuous and efficient service, facilitate the access of low-income users to subsidies granted by the government, inform users regarding efficient and safe use of the services, protect the environment, allow access and interconnection to other public service companies and large customers, cooperate with the authorities in the event of an emergency to prevent damage to users, and report to the authority any commercial start-up of operations.
The Colombian Electricity Act sets out the principles for the electricity industry, which are implemented through the resolutions enacted by the Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission, or CREG. Such principles are: efficiency (the correct allocation and use of resources and the supply of electricity at minimum cost); quality (compliance with technical requirements); continuity (continuous electricity supply without unjustified interruptions); adaptability (the incorporation of modern technology and administrative systems to promote quality and efficiency); neutrality (impartial treatment to all electricity consumers); solidarity (the provision of funds by high-income consumers to subsidize the subsistence consumption of low-income consumers); and fairness (an adequate and nondiscriminatory supply of electricity to all regions and sectors of the country).
The Colombian Electricity Act regulates the generation, trading, transmission, and distribution (the Activities) of electricity. Under the law, any company, domestic or foreign, may undertake any of the Activities. New companies, however, must engage exclusively in one of the Activities. Trading can be combined with either generation or distribution.
The market share for generators and traders is limited. The limit for generators is 25% of the Colombian system Firm Energy. Firm Energy refers to the maximum electric energy that a generation plant is able to deliver on a continuous basis during a year, in extremely dry conditions; for instance, in the case of the El Niño phenomenon.
Similarly, a trader may not account for more than 25% of the trading activity in the Colombian NIS. Limitations for traders take into account international energy sales. Market share is calculated on a monthly basis and traders have up to six months to reduce their share when the limit is exceeded.
Such limits are applied to economic groups, including companies that are controlled by, or under common control with, other companies. In addition, generators may not own more than a 25% interest in a distributor, and vice versa. However, this limitation only applies to individual companies and does not preclude cross-ownership by companies of the same corporate group.
A generator, distributor, trader or an integrated company (i.e., a firm combining generation, transmission and distribution activities), cannot own more than 15% of the equity in a transmission company if the latter represents more than 2% of the national transmission business in terms of revenues. A distribution company can have more than 25% of an integrated companys equity if the market share of the latter company is less than 2% of the national generation business. A company created before the enactment of Law No. 143 is banned from merging with another company created after Law No. 143 came into effect.
The Ministry of Mines and Energy defines the governments policy for the energy sector. Other government entities which play an important role in the electricity industry are: Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is in charge of overseeing and auditing utilities; CREG, which is in charge of regulating the energy and gas sectors; and the Mining and Energy Planning Agency, which is in charge of planning the expansion of the generation and transmission network.
CREG is empowered to issue regulations that govern technical and commercial operations and to set charges for regulated activities. CREGs main functions are to establish conditions for gradual deregulation of the electricity sector toward an open and competitive market, approve charges for transmission and distribution networks and charges for retailing to regulated customers, establish the methodology for calculating and establishing maximum tariffs for supplying the regulated market, establish regulations for planning and coordination of operations of the Colombian NIS, establish technical requirements for quality, reliability and security of supply, and protect customers rights.
Generation
The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis with companies selling their production on the electricity pool market, the wholesale market, at the spot price or by long-term private contracts with other participants and unregulated customers at freely negotiated prices. The Colombian NIS is the system formed by generation plants, the interconnection grid, regional transmission lines, distribution lines and consumer loads. The spot price is the price paid by the participant in the wholesale market for energy dispatched under the direction of the Dispatch National Center (CND). The hourly spot price paid for energy reflects prices offered by generators in the wholesale market and the respective supply and demand conditions.
Generators connected to the Colombian NIS can also receive reliability payments which are a result of the Firm Energy Obligation that they provide to the system. The Firm Energy Obligation (OEF) is a commitment on the part of generation companies backed by its physical resource capable of producing firm energy during scarcity periods. The generator that acquires an OEF will receive a fixed compensation during the commitment period, whether or not the fulfillment of its obligation is required. To receive reliability payments, generators have to participate in firm energy bids by declaring and certifying their firm energy. Until November 2012, the transition period, the firm energy supply for reliability purposes will be assigned proportionally to the declared firm energy of each generator. Beyond the transition period, the additional firm energy required by the system will be allocated by bids. The only auction held for this period took place in May 6, 2008, when existing generators participated with new generation projects while meeting the established market share limits.
Dispatch and Pricing
The purchase and sale of electricity can take place between generators, distributors acting in their capacity as traders, traders (who do not generate or distribute electricity) and unregulated customers. There are no restrictions for new entrants into the market as long as the participants comply with the applicable laws and regulations.
The wholesale market facilitates the sale of excess energy that has not been committed under contracts. In the wholesale market, an hourly spot price for all dispatched units is established based on the offer price of the highest priced generating dispatched unit for that period. The CND receives price bids each day from all the generators participating in the wholesale market. These bids indicate prices and the hourly available capacity for the following day. Based on this information, the CND guided by optimal dispatch principle (which assumes an infinite transmission capacity through the network), ranks the generators according to their offer price, starting with the lowest bid, and establishing the merit order, on an hourly basis, determining which generators will be dispatched the following day to satisfy expected demand. The price for all generators is set as the most expensive generator dispatched in each hourly period under the optimal dispatch. This price-ranking system is intended to ensure that national demand, increased by the total amount of energy exported to other countries, will be satisfied by the lowest cost combination of available generating units in the country.
Additionally, the CND performs the planned dispatch, which takes into account the limitations of the network, as well as every other condition necessary to satisfy the energy demands expected for the following day in a safe, reliable and cost-efficient manner. The cost differences between the planned dispatch and the optimal dispatch are called restrictions costs. The net value of these restrictions is assigned proportionally to all the traders within the Colombian NIS, according to their demands of energy, who pass these costs to the end users. Some generators have initiated legal proceedings arguing that recognized prices do not cover the costs associated with these restrictions.
From the second half of 2009 until June 2010, there was a critical hydrological condition in Colombia, due to the presence of El Niño phenomenon. In order to handle this situation, the Ministry of Mines and Energy and CREG enacted various temporary resolutions to modify the dispatch and pricing rules in order to ensure system reliability and prevent a possible deficit. Since June 2010, climate conditions have returned to normal and no power outages have occurred.
Export and Import Electricity
Decision CAN 536 of 2002, signed by the countries that participate in the Andean Nations Community (CAN) Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and Peru, established the general framework for the Subregional interconnection of electrical systems that created a coordinated economic dispatch of the countries involved in the interconnections. In this context, in March 2003 the interconnection system between Colombia and Ecuador was inaugurated.
In November 2009, Decision CAN 720 of 2009 was enacted; it replaced transitorily Decision CAN 536 for a maximum period of two years. Resolutions CREG 160-2009 and 189-2009 adapted the regulatory framework in Colombia according to the new Decision.
Transmission
Transmission companies which operate at least at 220 kV compose the National Transmission System, or NTS. They are required to provide access to third parties on equal conditions and are authorized to collect a tariff for their services. The transmission tariff includes a connection charge that underwrites the cost of operating the facilities, and a usage charge, which applies only to traders.
CREG guarantees an annual fixed income to transmission companies. Income is determined by the new replacement value of the networks and equipment and by the resulting value of bidding processes awarding new projects for the expansion of the NTS. This value is allocated among the traders of the NTS in proportion to their energy demand.
The expansion of the NTS is conducted according to model expansion plans designed by the Mining and Energy Planning Agency and pursuant to bidding processes opened to existing and new transmission companies, which are handled by the Ministry of Mines and Energy in accordance with the guidelines set by CREG. Accordingly, the construction, operation and maintenance of new projects is awarded to the company that offers the lowest present value of cash flows needed for carrying out the project. During 2009, CREG defined a transmission charge methodology.
Trading
The retail market is divided into regulated and unregulated customers. Customers in the unregulated market may freely contract for electricity supply directly from a generator or a distributor, acting as traders, or from a pure trader. The unregulated customer market, which for 2010 represented about 32.2% of the market, consists of customers with a peak demand of more than 0.1 MW or a minimum monthly consumption of 55 MWh.
Trading is the resale to end users of electricity purchased in the wholesale market. It may be conducted by generators, distributors or independent agents, which comply with certain requirements. Parties freely agree upon trading prices for unregulated customers.
Trading to regulated customers is subject to the regulated freedom regime under which tariffs are set by each trader using a combination of general cost formulas given by CREG and individual trading costs approved by CREG for each trader. Since CREG approves limits on costs, traders in the regulated market may set lower tariffs for economic reasons. Tariffs include, among other things, energy procurement costs, transmission charges, distribution charges and a trading margin.
The tariff formula became effective on February 1, 2008. The main changes in the new formula are the establishment of a fixed monthly charge and the introduction of reduction costs of non-technical energy losses in the trading charges. In addition, CREG allows the traders in the regulated market to choose tariff options to manage tariff increments.
In order to improve wholesale price formation, CREG is designing a new energy procurement scheme based on long term energy bids, known as Organized Market. The final rules for this new system are still not available, but CREG has this issue on its 2011 agenda.
Another trading change is the incorporation of an energy derivatives market. In May 2009, the company Derivex was created by the Bolsa de Valores de Colombia S.A. and XM Compañía de Expertos en Mercados S.A. E.S.P. In October 2010, the company began its operation with the first electricity forward contract, and it also plans to manage in the future derivative contracts related with natural gas and coal.
During 2010, CREG strengthened regulatory measures aiming to control default risk by forcing independent traders to leave the market after defaulting.
Environmental Regulation
The environmental framework in Colombia was established in Law No. 99 of 1993, which also established the Ministry of the Environment as the authority for determining environmental policies. The Ministry defines issues and executes policies and regulations that focus on the recovery, conservation, protection, organization, administration and use of renewable resources. Therefore, the use of natural resources or any impact to them as a result of any activity or project will require the issuance of permits and environmental licenses and the establishment of environmental management plans.
Any entity planning to develop projects or activities relating to generation, interconnection, transmission or distribution of electricity that may result in environmental deterioration must first obtain an environmental license.
According to Law No. 99, generation plants that have a total installed nominal capacity above 10 MW are required to contribute to the conservation of the environment through a payment for their activities at a regulated tariff. Hydroelectric power plants must pay 6% of their generation and thermoelectric plants must pay 4% of their generation. This payment is made monthly to the municipalities and environmental corporations where these facilities are located.
Peru
Industry Structure
The general legal framework applicable to the Peruvian electricity industry are: the Law of Electric Concessions (Decree Law No. 25,844) and its ancillary regulations, the Law to Secure the Efficient Development of Electric Generation (Law No. 28,832), the Technical Regulation on the Quality of the Electric Supply (Supreme Decree 020-97), the Electricity Import and Export Regulation (Supreme Decree 049-2005), the Antitrust Law on the Electricity Sector (Law No. 26,876),
and the Law that regulates the activity of the Supervisor Organization of Investments in Energy and Mining (Law No. 26,734, together with Law No. 27,699).
Some of the characteristics of the regulatory framework are (i) the separation of the three main activities: generation, transmission and distribution; (ii) freedom of prices for the supply of energy in competitive market conditions; (iii) a system of regulated prices based on the principle of efficiency together with a bidding regime; and (iv) private operation of the interconnected electricity systems subject to the principles of efficiency and quality of service.
There is one interconnected system, the SEIN, and several isolated regional and smaller systems that provide electricity to specific areas.
The Ministry of Energy and Mining, or the MINEM, defines energy policies applicable nationwide, regulates environmental matters applicable to the energy sector and oversees the granting, supervision, maturity and termination of licenses, authorizations and concessions for generation, transmission, and distribution activities.
Osinergmin is an autonomous public regulatory entity that controls and enforces compliance with legal and technical regulations related to electrical and hydrocarbon activities, controls and enforces compliance with the obligations stated in the concession contracts, and is responsible for the preservation of the environment in connection with the development of these activities. Osinergmins Tariff Regulatory Bureau has the authority to publish the regulated tariffs. Osinergmin also controls and supervises the bidding processes required by distribution companies to purchase energy from generators. The Committee of Economic Operation of the System, or COES, coordinates the operation and dispatch of electricity of the SEIN and prepares the technical and financial study that serves as a basis for the annual bus bar price calculations, as defined below. The COES includes as members the generation, transmission and distribution companies, as well as consumers with a capacity demand higher than 200 kW as unregulated customers.
Services provided by generation, transmission and distribution companies have to comply with technical standards stated in the Technical Regulations on the Quality of the Electric Supply. Failure to do so might result in the imposition of fines by Osinergmin.
Dispatch and Pricing
The coordination of electricity dispatch operations, the setting of spot prices and the control and administration of economic transactions that take place in the SEIN are controlled by COES. Generators can sell energy directly to large customers and buy the deficit or transfer the surplus between contracted energy and actual production in the pool at spot price. Distribution companies and large customers that have entered into private supply contracts with generation companies pay the contractual price directly to the generator (which includes tolls and compensations for the use of transmission systems) and also pay a toll to distribution companies for the use of their networks.
Customers with a demand of less than 200 kW are considered regulated customers, and the supply of their energy is considered as a public service. Customers whose annual demand is within the range of 200-2,500 kW are free to choose to be considered as regulated or unregulated customers.
In 2008, due to gas transport and electricity transmission problems, Osinergmin defined a new rule to calculate spot prices until December 2013. Decree 049-2008 established two models, one which represented a theoretical dispatch without considering any restrictions and, the other one, considering real dispatch with restrictions. The spot price is obtained from the theoretical dispatch, and the additional cost of operation resulting from system restrictions are paid to the affected generators through a mechanism established by the authority.
Generators receive a capacity payment whose main component is the product of an annual calculation that considers firm power of every power plant connected to the system. Every year, Osinergmin sets the power price that shall be assigned and paid to each generator pursuant to this concept.
Transmission
Transmission activities are divided in two categories: principal, which are for common use and allow the flow of energy through the national grid; and secondary, which are those lines that connect a power plant with the national grid, that connect principal transmission with the network of distribution companies or that connect directly to certain final consumers. Law No. 28,832, enacted in 2006, also defined guaranteed transmission systems and complementary transmission
systems, applicable to projects commissioned after the enactment of that law. Guaranteed system lines are the result of a public bid and complementary system lines are freely constructed and exploited as private projects. Principal and guaranteed system lines are accessible to all generators and allow electricity to be delivered to all customers. Transmission concessionaires receive an annual fixed income, as well as variable tariff revenues and connection tolls per kW. The secondary and complementary system lines are accessible to all generators but are used to serve only certain customers who are responsible for making payments related to their use of the system.
Concessions and authorizations
Generation companies that have a power plant with an installed capacity greater than 500 kW require a concession granted by the MINEM. Similarly, generation companies operating thermal power plants with an installed capacity greater than 500 kW require an authorization granted by the MINEM.
A concession for electricity generation activity is an agreement between the generator and MINEM, while an authorization is merely a unilateral permit granted by said public entity. Authorizations are granted by the MINEM for an unlimited period of time, although their termination is subject to the same considerations and requirements as the termination of concessions under the procedures set forth in the Law of Electrical Concessions (Law No. 25,844), dated November 19, 1992), and related regulations.
Cold Reserve
During 2009, MEM carried out several studies which concluded that, in the near future, SEIN would not tolerate any unavailability of large power plants due to the lack of power generation capacity in the system. As a result, MEM recommended the construction of new power plants that would serve as backup (Cold Reserve) in order to guarantee the flow of electricity to the system and avoid blackouts. As a result, the government agency in charge of promoting private investments (Proinversión) carried out a public bid in August 2010, seeking to secure investments for the addition of an extra 800 MW to the system, divided in three projects located in Talara, Trujillo and Ilo. Nevertheless, the bid resulted with only two of the projects being awarded: Talara (200 MW, for EEPSA, an affiliate of Endesa Latinoamérica) and Ilo (400 MW, for Enersur, an unrelated company). These plants will receive regular payments for being permanently available to operate and provide energy to the SEIN whenever the COES calls on them and will also be reimbursed for the fuel costs incurred in generating electricity.
Environmental Regulation
The environmental legal framework applicable to energy related activities in Peru is set forth in the Environmental Law (Law No. 28,611), dated October 15, 2005, and in the Regulation for Environmental Protection regarding Electricity Activities (Supreme Decree 029-94-EM). The MINEM dictates the specific environmental legal dispositions applicable to electric activities, and Osinergmin is in charge of supervising certain aspects of their application and implementation. According to the Environmental Law, the Ministry of Environment (created in May 2008) is in charge, as principal duties, of (i) designing the general environmental policies to every productive activity; and (ii) establishing the main guidelines of the different government authorities on their specific environmental sector regulations. During 2010, most supervision functions regarding the application and implementation of the Environmental Laws dispositions were transferred from Osinergmin to the Ministry of Environment.
In 2008, the MINEM enacted Supreme Decree 050-2008 to promote electricity generation using non conventional renewable energy (NCRE). Said legal disposition states as a goal that at least 5% of the SEINs demand must be supplied using NCRE. This 5% goal should be increased every five years. Technologies considered as NCRE include biomass, wind, tidal, geothermal, solar, and mini-hydro (less than 20 MW) power.
C. Organizational Structure.
Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates
We are part of a group led by the Italian company, Enel. Enel owns 92.1% of Endesa Spain, and the latter owns 60.6% of the share capital of Enersis through its Spanish subsidiary Endesa Latinoamérica, which in turn owns 60% of the share capital of Endesa Chile.
Enel is a publicly-traded company headquartered in Italy, primarily engaged in the energy sector, with presence in 23 countries and more than 95,000 MW of installed capacity. It provides service to 60.9 million clients through its electricity and gas businesses.
The following chart shows the relative position of Endesa Chile in Enel Group, as well as the most important operating subsidiaries and jointly-controlled companies:
The companies listed in the following table were consolidated by us as of December 31, 2010. In the case of subsidiaries, our economic interest is calculated by multiplying our percentage economic interest in a directly held subsidiary by the percentage economic interest of any entity in the chain of ownership of such ultimate subsidiary.
Principal Companies and Country of Operations |
|
% Economic |
|
Consolidated |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
(in billions of Ch$ except percentages) |
| ||||
Electricity Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celta (Chile) |
|
100 |
% |
105.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
Endesa Chile (Chile) (1) |
|
|
|
3,864.8 |
|
166.8 |
|
Endesa Eco (Chile) |
|
100 |
% |
145.1 |
|
5.6 |
|
San Isidro (Chile) |
|
100 |
% |
124.9 |
|
16.3 |
|
Pangue (Chile) |
|
95 |
% |
161.8 |
|
78.9 |
|
Pehuenche (Chile) |
|
92.7 |
% |
296.6 |
|
214.0 |
|
El Chocón (Argentina) |
|
65.4 |
% |
163.3 |
|
31.7 |
|
Endesa Costanera (Argentina) |
|
69.8 |
% |
174.4 |
|
10.8 |
|
Emgesa (Colombia) (2) |
|
26.9 |
% |
1,358.7 |
|
261.5 |
|
Edegel (Perú) |
|
62.5 |
% |
688.8 |
|
59.8 |
|
Other Non-Electricity Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingendesa (Chile) |
|
100 |
% |
13.2 |
|
1.1 |
|
Túnel El Melón (Chile) |
|
100 |
% |
38.7 |
|
2.9 |
|
(1) On a stand-alone perspective, excluding subsidiaries.
(2) We hold 31.3% of voting shares, and due to a transfer of rights from Endesa Latinoamérica, we have the right to appoint the majority of the Board members and effectively control Emgesa.
Celta (Chile)
Celta was formed in 1995 to build and operate two thermoelectric plants in the SING: a coal-fired plant with an installed capacity of 158 MW and a gas/fuel oil power plant with 24 MW of installed capacity. Celta is wholly-owned by Endesa Chile.
Endesa Eco (Chile)
On April 18, 2005, Endesa Chile created Endesa Eco S.A., whose objectives are the promotion and development of renewable energy projects such as mini-hydro, wind, geo-thermal, solar and biomass power plants and to act as the depositary and trader of emission reduction certificates obtained by these projects. As of December 2010, Endesa Ecos installed capacity was 87 MW. Endesa Eco is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Endesa Chile.
San Isidro (Chile)
San Isidro, a company wholly-owned by Endesa Chile, was incorporated in Chile in 1996 to build and operate a 379 MW combined-cycle thermal plant in Quillota, in the Valparaíso Region. The plant began commercial operations in 1998. A 220 kV transmission line of 9 kilometers was built to connect this thermal plant to the SIC. This transmission system is owned by Transquillota Ltda., in which San Isidro has a 50% interest.
Pangue (Chile)
Pangue was incorporated to build and operate a 467 MW installed capacity hydroelectric power station in the Bío-Bío River. The first unit started operations in 1996 and the second unit started operations in 1997. Endesa Chile holds 95% of Pangues share capital.
Pehuenche (Chile)
Pehuenche, a generation company connected to the SIC, owns three hydroelectric facilities south of Santiago in the high rainfall hydrological basin of the Maule River, with a total installed capacity of 699 MW. The 570 MW Pehuenche plant started operations in 1991, the 89 MW Curillinque plant started operations in 1993, and the 40 MW Loma Alta plant started operating in 1997. Endesa Chile holds 92.7% of Pehuenche.
El Chocón (Argentina)
El Chocón is an electricity generation company, incorporated in Argentina, located between the Neuquén and Río Negro provinces, in the Comahue Basin in southern Argentina. It has two hydroelectric power stations with an aggregate installed capacity of 1,328 MW. A 30-year concession, which expires in 2023, was granted by the Argentine government to our subsidiary, Hidroinvest S.A., which bought 59.0% of the shares in July 1993 during the privatization process. Endesa Chile operates El Chocón for a fee pursuant to an operating agreement with a term equal to the duration of the concession. In March 2007, Endesa Chile increased its beneficial interest in El Chocón from 44.8% to 65.4%.
Endesa Costanera (Argentina)
Endesa Costanera is a publicly traded electricity generation company in Argentina, with 2,324 MW of total installed capacity in Buenos Aires, including six steam turbines with an aggregate capacity of 1,138 MW which burn oil and gas, and two natural gas combined cycle facilities with a total capacity of 1,186 MW. The company was acquired from the Argentine government after the privatization of Servicios Eléctricos del Gran Buenos Aires S.A. in 1992, when Endesa Chile acquired a 24% interest. In February 2007, Endesa Chile increased its total ownership to the current level of 69.8%.
Edegel (Peru)
Edegel is an electricity generation company, acquired by Endesa Chile in 1995. It currently owns seven hydroelectric plants and two thermal plants, with a combined installed capacity of 1,668 MW. In October 2009, Endesa Chile purchased an additional 29.4% share in Edegel from Generalima, a subsidiary of Endesa Latinoamérica. Thus, Endesa Chile increased its beneficial ownership in Edegel from 33.1% to 62.5%.
In May 2009, as contemplated in the contract signed by Edegel in 2000 for the financing of the Yanango and Chimay projects, the equity contribution for the subsidiary Chinango S.A.C., constituted in March 2008, took place. Edegel holds an 80% share of Chinango, and Peruana de Energía S.A.A. owns the remaining 20% share.
Emgesa (Colombia)
Emgesa has a total installed generating capacity of 2,914 MW of which 85% corresponds to hydroelectric power plants and the remaining to thermoelectric power plants. On September 1, 2007 Central Hidroeléctrica Betania S.A. E.S.P. and Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. were merged into Betania, which then adopted the name of Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.
On September 15, 1997, Central Hidroeléctrica Betania, through its former subsidiary Inversiones Betania S.A. and in association with Endesa Desarrollo S.A. of Spain, was awarded control of Emgesa through Capital de Energía S.A. (CESA), with 48.5% of the shares. On January 30, 2006, due to a company restructuring, CESA ceased to exist. On March 2, 2006, Emgesa purchased the assets of Termocartagena (208 MW) through a public tender process. Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. has a direct participation in Emgesa of 51.5%. Endesa Chiles beneficial ownership in Emgesa is 26.9%, even though it has 31.3% of the voting rights, and due to a transfer of rights from another subsidiary of Endesa Spain, it has the right to appoint the majority of the Board members and, therefore, controls Emgesa.
Ingendesa (Chile)
Ingendesa is a multi-disciplinary engineering company founded in 1990. Its purpose is to provide engineering services, project management and related services in Chile and abroad for Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries. The company offers civil, mechanical and electrical engineering, metallurgy, architecture and environmental services. Ingendesa is wholly-owned by Endesa Chile.
Túnel El Melón (Chile)
Túnel El Melón is a two-lane 2.5 kilometer tunnel. The project was built between the provinces of Petorca and Quillota, Valparaíso Region, Chile. The authorization for provisional start-up was granted on September 14, 1995, and the Ministry of Public Works granted definitive authorization on May 3, 1996. The operation will take place until the termination of the concessions contractual period in June 2016. Endesa Chile holds 100% of the share capital.
Selected Related Companies
Endesa Cemsa (Argentina)
Cemsa is responsible for trading electricity. As of the date of this report, Endesa Chile has an indirect ownership holding in Cemsa of 45%. Cemsas other shareholder is Endesa Spain through Endesa Latinoamérica.
Electrogas (Chile)
Electrogas was constituted in 1996. This company offers natural gas transportation services to the Valparaíso Region in Chile, especially to the San Isidro and Nehuenco combined-cycle plants at Quillota. Endesa Chile has a beneficial interest of 42.5% share in this company. The other shareholders are Colbún S.A. and ENAP.
GasAtacama (Chile)
Endesa Chile has a 50% beneficial interest in GasAtacama, located in the northern region of Chile. Since 2007, Southern Cross Latin America Private Equity Fund III, L.P. owns the remaining 50% beneficial interest. Subsidiaries of this holding company were Gasoducto Atacama Chile S.A., Gasoducto Atacama Argentina S.A. and GasAtacama Generación S.A., which are involved in electricity generation and natural gas transportation. On November 28, 2008, GasAtacama Generación S.A. and Gasoducto Atacama Chile S.A. merged into GasAtacama Generación S.A., which changed its name to GasAtacama Chile S.A.
HidroAysén (Chile)
HidroAysén was incorporated in March 2007. Endesa Chile has a 51% ownership interest and Colbún S.A. the remaining 49%. The company was created to develop and exploit the Aysén project, a hydroelectrical project located in the Aysén Region, in the southern region of Chile.
Endesa Brasil (Brazil)
In 2005, Endesa Brasil was formed as a company to manage all generation, transmission and distribution assets that Endesa Latinoamérica S.A., or Endesa Latinoamérica (formerly known as Endesa Internacional), a subsidiary of Endesa Spain, held together with Enersis, Endesa Chile and Chilectra in Brazil, namely, through Ampla, Endesa Fortaleza, Investluz, CIEN, Cachoeira Dourada and Coelce. Endesa Chile has a beneficial interest of 38.9% in Endesa Brasil.
For additional information of all Endesa Chiles subsidiaries and jointly-controlled companies, please refer to Appendix No. 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
GNL Quintero
GNL Quintero was incorporated on March 9, 2007. Endesa Chile has a 20% ownership interest and the remaining interest is owned by British Gas (40%), ENAP (20%) and Metrogas (20%). This company operates a LNG regasification facility located in Quintero Bay whereby LNG is unloaded, stored and regasified.
This project was built by Chicago Bridge & Iron and currently has a regasification capacity of 9.6 million m3 per day and two 160,000 m3 LNG containment tanks.
D. Property, Plants and Equipment.
Endesa Chiles main properties in Chile are its 28 electricity generation facilities, in addition to its 27,793 square meter office headquarters in Santiago. Endesa Chile consolidates revenues from generating companies in Argentina, Colombia and Peru, which involve an additional 26 generation power plants.
A substantial portion of Endesa Chiles cash flow and net income is derived from the sale of electricity produced by its electricity generation facilities. Significant damage to one or more of Endesa Chiles main electricity generation facilities or interruption in the production of electricity, whether as a result of an earthquake, flood, volcanic activity or any other such cause, could have a material adverse effect on Endesa Chiles operations. Endesa Chile insures all of its electricity generation facilities against damage due to earthquakes, fires, floods, other Acts of God (but not for prolonged droughts, which is a risk not covered by insurance companies), and from damage due to third-party actions, based on the appraised value of the facilities as determined from time to time by an independent appraiser. Based on geological, hydrological and engineering studies, Endesa Chiles management believes that the risk of an event with a material adverse effect is remote. Claims under Endesa Chiles insurance policies are subject to customary deductibles and other conditions. Endesa Chile also maintains business interruption insurance providing for coverage for failure of any of our facilities for a period of up to 24 months, including the deductible period.
The insurance coverage taken for non-Chilean property is approved by each companys management, taking into account the quality of the insurance companies and the needs, conditions and risk evaluations of each generating facility, and is based on general corporate guidelines.
All insurance policies are purchased from reputable international insurers. We continuously monitor and meet with the insurance companies in order to obtain what we believe is the most commercially reasonable insurance coverage.
The following table identifies the power plants that Endesa Chile owns, at the end of each year, and their basic characteristics:
Country/Company |
|
Power Plant Name |
|
Power Plant Type (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MW |
|
MW |
|
MW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
Total |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
2,324 |
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera Steam Turbine |
|
Steam Turbine/Natural Gas+ Fuel Oil |
|
1,138 |
|
1,138 |
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera Combined Cycle II |
|
Combined Cycle/Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
859 |
|
859 |
|
859 |
|
|
|
Central Buenos Aires Combined Cycle I |
|
Combined Cycle/Natural Gas |
|
327 |
|
327 |
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chocón |
|
Total |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
1,328 |
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
Chocón |
|
Reservoir |
|
1,200 |
|
1,200 |
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
Arroyito |
|
Pass-through |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
Total Capacity in Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile |
|
Total |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
3,446 |
|
3,40 |
7 |
|
|
Total Hydroelectric |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
2,290 |
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
Rapel |
|
Reservoir |
|
377 |
|
377 |
|
377 |
|
|
|
Cipreses |
|
Reservoir |
|
106 |
|
106 |
|
106 |
|
|
|
El Toro |
|
Reservoir |
|
450 |
|
450 |
|
450 |
|
|
|
Los Molles |
|
Pass-through |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
Sauzal |
|
Pass-through |
|
77 |
|
77 |
|
77 |
|
|
|
Sauzalito |
|
Pass-through |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
Isla (2) |
|
Pass-through |
|
68 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
|
|
|
Antuco |
|
Pass-through |
|
320 |
|
320 |
|
320 |
|
|
|
Abanico |
|
Pass-through |
|
136 |
|
136 |
|
136 |
|
|
|
Ralco |
|
Reservoir |
|
690 |
|
690 |
|
690 |
|
|
|
Palmucho (3) |
|
Pass-through |
|
32 |
|
34 |
|
34 |
|
|
|
Total Thermal |
|
|
|
853 |
|
1,156 |
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
Huasco (4) |
|
Steam Turbine/Coal |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
Bocamina |
|
Steam Turbine/Coal |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
128 |
|
|
|
Diego de Almagro (5) |
|
Gas Turbine/ Diesel Oil |
|
47 |
|
47 |
|
24 |
|
|
|
Huasco |
|
Gas Turbine/IFO 180 Oil |
|
64 |
|
64 |
|
64 |
|
|
|
Taltal |
|
Gas Turbine/Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
245 |
|
245 |
|
245 |
|
|
|
San Isidro 2 (6) |
|
Combined Cycle /Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
353 |
|
399 |
|
399 |
|
|
|
Quintero (7) |
|
Gas Turbine/Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
|
|
257 |
|
257 |
|
Pehuenche |
|
Total |
|
|
|
699 |
|
699 |
|
699 |
|
|
|
Pehuenche |
|
Reservoir |
|
570 |
|
570 |
|
570 |
|
|
|
Curillinque |
|
Pass-through |
|
89 |
|
89 |
|
89 |
|
|
|
Loma Alta |
|
Pass-through |
|
40 |
|
40 |
|
40 |
|
Pangue |
|
Pangue |
|
Reservoir |
|
467 |
|
467 |
|
467 |
|
San Isidro |
|
San Isidro |
|
Combined Cycle /Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
379 |
|
379 |
|
379 |
|
Celta |
|
Total |
|
|
|
182 |
|
182 |
|
182 |
|
|
|
Tarapacá |
|
Steam Turbine/Coal |
|
158 |
|
158 |
|
158 |
|
|
|
Tarapacá |
|
Gas Turbine/Diesel Oil |
|
24 |
|
24 |
|
24 |
|
Endesa Eco |
|
Total |
|
|
|
27 |
|
87 |
|
87 |
|
|
|
Canela |
|
Wind Farm |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
Canela II (8) |
|
Wind Farm |
|
|
|
60 |
|
60 |
|
|
|
Ojos de Agua |
|
Pass-through |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
Gasatacama |
|
Atacama (9) |
|
Combined Cycle /Natural Gas+Diesel Oil |
|
390 |
|
390 |
|
390 |
|
Total Capacity in Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
5,650 |
|
5,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emgesa |
|
Total |
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
Guavio |
|
Reservoir |
|
1,213 |
|
1,213 |
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
Paraíso |
|
Reservoir |
|
276 |
|
276 |
|
276 |
|
|
|
La Guaca |
|
Pass-through |
|
325 |
|
325 |
|
325 |
|
|
|
Termozipa |
|
Steam Turbine/Coal |
|
236 |
|
236 |
|
236 |
|
|
|
Cartagena |
|
Steam Turbine/ Natural Gas + Diesel Oil |
|
208 |
|
208 |
|
208 |
|
|
|
Minor plants (10) |
|
Pass-through |
|
96 |
|
96 |
|
116 |
|
|
|
Betania |
|
Reservoir |
|
541 |
|
541 |
|
541 |
|
Total Capacity in Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
2,895 |
|
2,914 |
|
Peru |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edegel |
|
Total |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
1,473 |
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
Huinco |
|
Pass-through |
|
247 |
|
247 |
|
247 |
|
|
|
Matucana |
|
Pass-through |
|
129 |
|
129 |
|
129 |
|
|
|
Callahuanca |
|
Pass-through |
|
80 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
|
|
|
Moyopampa |
|
Pass-through |
|
65 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
|
|
|
Huampani |
|
Pass-through |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
Yanango (11) |
|
Pass-through |
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chimay (11) |
|
Pass-through |
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Rosa(12)(13) |
|
Gas Turbine/Diesel Oil |
|
229 |
|
430 |
|
429 |
|
|
|
Ventanilla |
|
Combined Cycle/Natural Gas |
|
493 |
|
493 |
|
493 |
|
Chinango |
|
Total |
|
|
|
0 |
|
194 |
|
194 |
|
|
|
Yanango |
|
Pass-through |
|
|
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
Chimay |
|
Pass-through |
|
|
|
151 |
|
151 |
|
Total Capacity in Peru |
|
|
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
1,667 |
|
1,668 |
|
Total Endesa Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
13,297 |
|
13,864 |
|
13,845 |
|
(1) |
|
Reservoir and pass-through refer to a hydroelectric plant that uses a dam or a river, respectively, to move the turbines which generate electricity. |
|
|
Steam refers to the technology of a thermal power plant that uses natural gas, coal, diesel or fuel oil, to produce steam that moves the turbines to generate the electricity. |
|
|
Gas Turbine (GT) or Open Cycle refers to the technology of a thermal power plant that uses either diesel or natural gas to produce gas that moves the turbines to generate the electricity. |
|
|
Combined Cycle refers to the technology of a thermal power plant that uses natural gas, diesel oil or fuel oil to generate gas that first moves the turbines to generate electricity and then recovers the gas that escapes from that process to generate steam to move another turbine. |
|
|
Wind Farm refers to the technology that transforms the kinetic energy of wind into electricity. |
(2) |
|
In December 2009, the CDEC-SIC recognized an increase in the installed capacity of the Isla power plant, from 68 MW to 70 MW. |
(3) |
|
In December 2009, the CDEC-SIC recognized an increase in the installed capacity of the Palmucho power plant, from 32 MW to 34 MW. |
(4) |
|
The commercial operation of Huascos steam/coal turbine ended on July 31, 2010. |
(5) |
|
Until March 2010, it included one additional unit of Diego de Almagro (23 MW), which Endesa Chile had rented from Codelco since 2001. |
(6) |
|
In December 2009 the CDEC-SIC recognized an increase in the installed capacity of the San Isidro 2 power plant, from 353 MW to 399 MW, due to the use of GNL as a replacement for diesel. |
(7) |
|
In July and September 2009, the first and second unit started their commercial operations with a gross output of 129 MW and 128 MW, respectively. The Quintero power plant was finally declared as having a gross capacity of 257 MW, in open cycle operating with diesel, and from December 2009, it is also able to operate with natural gas from the LNG re-gasification plant. |
(8) |
|
In December 2009, the Canela II wind farm started its commercial operations with a total declared capacity of 60 MW. |
(9) |
|
Since 2008, we include 50% of GasAtacamas installed capacity, our jointly-controlled company. |
(10) |
|
Minor plants are registered with a total capacity of 116 MW. As of December 31, 2010 Emgesa owned and operated six minor plants: Charquito, El Limonar, La Tinta, Tequendama, La Junca and San Antonio. |
(11) |
|
In May 2009, Yanango and Chimay power plants were transferred to Chinango, Edegels subsidiary |
(12) |
|
During 2008, the installed capacity of Santa Rosa was redefined as required by the relevant authority. |
(13) |
|
In September 2009, the gas turbine, corresponding to the expansion of Santa Rosa thermal plant started its commercial operations with a gross capacity of 193 MW. In November 2009, a capacity increase of 7 MW was recognized, reaching 200 MW. Additionally, in April 2009, a capacity increase of 0.61 MW in the TG7 turbine of the Santa Rosa plant was also recognized. |
In addition to generation power plants, Endesa Chile owns other assets which are immaterial in the aggregate, such as transmission assets in Peru and Túnel El Melón in Chile. These assets, in the aggregate, represent less than 1% of the value of Endesa Chiles total consolidated assets.
As of December 2010, the Company had received the international standard ISO 14,001 certification on 100% of its installed capacity in South America, which included 54 out of 54 generation facilities that produced 99.5% of the total annual generation according to the ISO 14,001 standard.
Investment Projects Completed during 2010
Argentina. Manuel Belgrano and San Martín Power Plant Projects
Two power plant projects, Manuel Belgrano and San Martín, both related to Endesa Chile through its subsidiaries, Endesa Costanera and El Chocón, were completed during 2010. Each project consisted of the installation of a combined cycle gas turbine, the first located next to Campana (80 kilometers north of Buenos Aires), and the second, in Timbúes (35 kilometers north of Rosario).
The Manuel Belgrano power plant was declared in commercial operations as a combined cycle plant on January 7, 2010 with an installed capacity of 848 MW. The annual generation during 2010 was 4,018 GWh. The San Martín power plant started its commercial operations as a combined cycle on February 2, 2010 with an installed capacity of 849 MW. The annual generation during 2010 was 3,139 GWh.
Chile. LNG Receiving Terminal at Quintero, Valparaíso Region
In May 2007, as part of a consortium with ENAP, Metrogas and British Gas, in which Endesa Chile participates with a 20% stake, we agreed to construct the LNG regasification facility in Quintero Bay. Partial commercial operations began in September 2009 and full commercial operations began on January 1, 2011. During 2010, 26 commercial ships unloaded LNG in this facility, and Endesa Chile consumed 978 million m3 of LNG during that period.
Projects under Construction
Chile. Bocamina Power Plant Expansion, Second Unit
Located in the district of Coronel, Bío-Bío Region, the project benefits from the existing harbor services, as well as some ancillary facilities of the first unit, built for coal storing and ashes disposal. This second unit will use pulverized coal and technology for emissions reduction. Its installed capacity is estimated at 370 MW. As a result of the February 27, 2010 earthquake, which severely affected the Bío-Bío Region, the start-up date, originally expected for December 2010, has been postponed until the second half of 2011. This project is being financed with internally generated funds.
Colombia. El Quimbo Hydroelectric Project
El Quimbo hydroelectric project is located in the department of Huila, on the Magdalena River, upstream of the Betania power plant. Its installed capacity will be 400 MW through two generation units. We expect that the project will start operations by December 2014. This project will be financed mainly with resources to be provided by external financing and to a lesser extent by internally generated funds of Emgesa.
In 2009, the Ministry of the Environment approved the environmental license and building permission. As a result of the awarding process, Emgesa assumed a Firm Energy Obligation for El Quimbo starting in December 2014.
The principal contracts, corresponding to the civil works and the manufacture, supply and assembly of the equipment, were awarded to the Impregilo OHL consortium and the Alstom Schrader Camargo consortium.
Projects under Development
The estimated investments disclosed in this section aggregate the funds that the Company expects to spend in nominal dollars in each year. Budgeted amounts include connecting lines that could eventually be owned by third parties and paid as tolls. In general terms, projects are expected to be financed with resources to be provided by external financing as well as internally generated funds for each of the companies described.
We continuously analyze different growth opportunities in the countries in which we participate. Thus, the expected start-up for each project is continuously assessed and will be defined based on the commercial opportunities and the financing capacity of the Company to fund these projects. The most relevant projects in the pipeline are as follows:
Chile. Los Cóndores Project
The Los Cóndores project will be located in the Maule Region. It consists of the construction of a pass-through hydroelectric plant of 150 MW installed capacity, which will use the waters from the Maule lake reservoir through an adduction system 12 kilometers long. The plant will be connected to the SIC at the Ancoa substation.
The project is completing its feasibility study for a revised version that implies the construction of a tunnel with TBM technology (tunnel machinery) which involves higher efficiencies, safety standards and a lower environmental impact.
The environmental approval procedures for the line connecting with the SIC began in October 2010. Total estimated investment is in the range of $ 450-$ 500 million, of which $ 21 million have been paid. Start-up is expected no earlier than the second half of 2016. Until now, this project has been financed with resources provided by Endesa Chile. During 2011, we expect to present a modification to the environmental impact study, conclude the basic engineering studies and start the bidding process for construction.
Chile. Neltume and Choshuenco Hydroelectric Projects
The Neltume and Choshuenco projects are located in Los Ríos Region, on the upper part of the Valdivia River basin. The Neltume project consists of a 490 MW installed capacity pass-through hydro plant. The Choshuenco project uses the flows of the Llanquihue River at its source, at the junction with the Fuy and Neltume Rivers, with the possibility of building a pass-through hydroplant of approximately 130 MW. Total estimated investment for the Neltume project is in the range of $ 850-$ 900 million, of which $ 28 million have been paid. For Choshuenco, total estimated investment is in the range of $ 400-$ 450 million, of which $ 5 million have been paid. Start-up is expected no earlier than the second half of 2017 for the Neltume project and first half of 2018 for the Choshuenco project. Until now, both projects have been financed with resources provided by Endesa Chile.
The Neltume project is at its basic engineering stage and some design improvements continue to be analyzed. On December 2, 2010, the projects environmental impact assessment was re-submitted and was accepted for process on December 10, 2010, by the environmental authority. The project for the Neltume-Pullinque transmission line was submitted to the environmental evaluation system on December 9, 2010, and was accepted for process on December 16, 2010. The Choshuenco project is in a stage of analyzing alternatives.
Chile. HidroAysén Project
The HidroAysén hydroelectric project consists of five hydroelectric power stations, with an aggregate installed capacity of 2,750 MW, two of which are in the Baker River (660 MW and 360 MW) and the other three are in the Pascua River (770 MW, 500 MW and 460 MW). Connection to the SIC consists of a 500 kV high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission line with an extension of approximately 2,000 kilometers. Estimated investment for Endesa Chiles 51% participation is in the range of $ 2,700-$ 3,200 million, of which $ 92 million have been paid. Start-up of the first unit is expected no earlier than the second half of 2019. Until now, our stake in this project has been financed with resources provided by Endesa Chile. On May 9, 2011 the environmental authorities approved the Environmental Impact Assessment presented for the HidroAysén project.
On December 31, 2009, the contract with Transelec for the provision of services for the development of the pro-forma project and environmental assessments for the HVDC line for transporting electricity to the SIC expired. Effective January 1, 2010 HidroAysén assumed the management of all the contracts that were in effect at that date, including those associated with the preparation of the environmental impact study. In February 2010, the evaluation of requests from third parties interested in using transmission line the capacity was completed, thus complying with the open-season process established in Condition No. 1 of resolution No. 022/2007 of the Antitrust Tribunal, without any of the interested companies presenting the payment of the amount corresponding to the lines preliminary costs and evaluation.
Different communications initiatives were continued with the regions inhabitants, with the communities and local authorities, and at a nationwide level, showing the principal advantages of hydroelectricity to the different stakeholders of the project. Additionally, HidroAysén has assumed a voluntary commitment to provide cheaper energy to the Aysén Region, which currently pays one of the highest electricity costs in the country. This project consists of increasing the energy availability in the region by 26.6 MW, mainly through mini-hydroelectric plants.
The construction of the HidroAysén project is expected to improve road infrastructure, telecommunications coverage, and the development of new services associated with the construction, especially housing, meals, transport and commerce. In addition it will create new jobs, which would rise to a monthly average of 2,260, with a peak of 5,000 at the stage of highest demand.
Chile. Punta Alcalde Power Plant
The project consists of the construction of a thermoelectric plant with two steam-coal units, with a total installed capacity of 740 MW, located in the Atacama Region. The plant will be connected to the SIC at the Maitencillo substation through a 220 kV transmission system.
Total estimated investment for the first unit of this plant is in the range of $ 1,050-$ 1,100 million, of which $ 14 million have been paid. Start-up is expected no earlier than first half of 2016. Until now, this project has been financed with resources provided by Endesa Chile.
The project is in its feasibility stage and on-site studies are being made. The projects environmental impact study process, which was submitted on February 27, 2009, is continuing. As of December 2010, progress was being made in preparing responses to the ICSARA No. 3.
Chile. Piruquina Mini Hydro Project
The project is developed by Endesa Eco and is located in the Chiloé Island, 17 km from Castro. It consists of a pass-through hydroelectric power plant which will use water flow from the Carihueico River. According to the feasibility study, the installed capacity will be 7.6 MW. The plant will be connected to the SIC at the Pid-Pid substation, located about 10 kilometers from the plant.
Total estimated investment is in the range of $ 25-$ 30 million, of which $ 3 million have been paid. Start-up is expected no earlier than the first half of 2013. Until now, this project has been financed with resources provided by Endesa Chile.
In November 2009, the Los Lagos Region Corema approved the environmental impact study. On December 10, 2010, the notice to proceed was given to the company CON-PAX for stage No. 1 of the EPC contract, which includes the preparation of the basic engineering and obtaining of the environmental and other permits. Once stage No. 1 is completed, Endesa Eco can give notice to proceed for stage No. 2, corresponding to the construction of the plant.
Peru. Curibamba Hydroelectric Project
This corresponds to a 188 MW plant located in the department of Junín and which uses waters from the rivers Comas and Uchubamba, in the upper part of the river where the Chimay power plant is located.
Total estimated investment for this plant is in the range of $ 300-$ 350 million, of which $ 3 million have been paid. Start-up is expected no earlier than the second half of 2016. Until now, this project has been financed with resources provided by Edegel.
On September 16, 2010 the environmental impact study of the generating plant was submitted to the Energy Environmental Affairs Authority (DGAAE). The preparation of the environmental impact study for the transmission line has begun in October 2010. Progress was also made during 2010 in carrying out the topographical and bathymetric studies, the study of the property deed and diagnosis of the social-economic situation of the inhabitants of the projects area of influence.
Major Encumbrances
Endesa Costaneras supplier debt with Mitsubishi Corporation corresponds to the remaining payments in the purchase of equipment. As of December 31, 2010, the value of the assets pledged as liens on this debt was Ch$ 41 billion. Additionally, Endesa Costanera has executed liens for Ch$ 12 billion as of December 31, 2010, in favor of Credit Suisse First Boston in order to guarantee a loan.
Edegel has a debt arising from the financing of the Ventanilla power plant. As of December 31, 2010, the value of the assets pledged as liens for this debt was Ch$ 96 billion. For further information, see Note 31 of our audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Climate Change
In recent years, the country and the region have seen a growing development related to non conventional renewable energy and strategies to face climate change. This has led both the public and private sectors to conduct suitable strategies for adapting themselves to the new requirements, evidenced by legal obligations at the local level, commitments assumed by countries at the international level and the demanding requirements of the international markets in these matters.
Non-conventional renewable energies (NCRE) provide energy with minimal or no adverse environmental impact. They are therefore considered as technological options that strengthen sustainable energy development as they supplement the production of traditional generators.
During 2010, Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries, in particular Endesa Eco, carried out several activities and held working meetings with different public, academic and private entities, in order to learn and share experiences about the technical and regulatory developments in connection with NCRE and climate change at both the local and international levels, analyze and establish strategic alliances, develop social and private projects and strengthen the leadership position achieved by the company in Chile.
In addition to the Canela wind farm (18 MW, in operation since late 2007) and the Ojos de Agua mini-hydroelectric plant (9 MW) (in operation since 2008), the Canela II wind farm (60 MW), located in the Coquimbo Region, started operations in 2009.
Regarding the development of emission reduction mechanisms, during 2010, the projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) circuit were:
Ojos de Agua Mini-Hydroelectric Plant: Procedures began during 2009 for the verification of the greenhouse gas emissions (CO2) avoided by the Ojos de Agua mini-hydroelectric plant the year before, in order to certify and trade these emission reductions under the CDM. In 2010, we also requested the verification of the greenhouse gas emissions avoided during 2009. Since its start-up in 2008, the installation has avoided the emission of some 42,000 tons of CO2, which can be traded once they are verified.
Canela Wind Farm: On April 3, 2009, the United Nations Climate Change Office approved the registration of the Canela project in the CDM circuit as a CDM project, which recognizes that this wind farm may verify and trade the greenhouse gas emissions it will avoid during its useful life. During 2010, the Designated Operational Entity was contracted for verifying the first period of carbon credits. Since its start-up in 2009, the installation has avoided the emission of some 47,000 tons of CO2, which can be traded on the CDM circuit as soon as they are verified.
Canela II Wind Farm: A large part of the procedures for validating the Canela 60 MW wind farm (Canela II) were carried out during 2010, a requirement prior to obtaining registration of the reduction with the UNFCCC. On October 18, the Ministry of the Environment, as the Designated National Authority, signed the letter accrediting that the project contributes to the countrys sustainable development and therefore meets the requirements for being registered as a CDM project. According to the base-line analysis presented in the Project Design Document (PDD), we estimate that the facility will avoid the emission of 89,608 tons of CO2 annually.
Detail of CDM projects processed in 2010 by Endesa Eco
CDM project |
|
Company/country |
|
Position as of December 31, 2010 |
|
Emission factor |
|
Approximate |
Ojos de Agua mini-hydroelectric plant |
|
Endesa Eco (Chile) |
|
Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since April 2007 and currently in verification the reduction in emissions of 2008 and 2009 period. |
|
0.4348 |
|
42,000 |
Canela wind farm |
|
Central Eólica Canela S.A. (Chile) |
|
Registered with the Executive Authority of the UNFCCC since April 2009 |
|
0.5713 |
|
47,000 |
Canela II wind farm |
|
Central Eólica Canela S.A. (Chile) |
|
PDD prepared, public enquiry held and validation in progress. |
|
0.6541 |
|
89,608 |
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
A. Operating Results.
General
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included in Item 18 in this annual report, and Selected Financial Data, included in Item 3 herein. Our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted IFRS as issued by the IASB, in replacement of the previous accounting principles, which were under Chilean GAAP.
1. Discussion of Main Factors Affecting Operating Results and Financial Condition of the Company
We own and operate electricity generation companies in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru. We also have equity investments in Endesa Brasil, which owns generation companies in Brazil that are operated by us, as well as companies in the transmission and distribution businesses. Our revenues, cash flow and equity income primarily come from the electricity generation business of Endesa Chile itself and of our subsidiaries and associates, which operate in these five countries. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, non-generation operating revenues, related primarily to engineering consulting services, represented 1.3%, 1.5% and 0.8%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues in each year.
Factors such as hydrological conditions, regulatory developments, extraordinary actions adopted by government authorities, and economic conditions in each country in which we operate, are important in determining our financial results. In addition, the results from operations and financial condition are affected by variations in exchange rates between the peso and the currencies of the other four countries in which we operate. These exchange variations may have an important impact in the consolidation of the results of our companies outside Chile. Lastly, we have certain critical accounting policies that affect our consolidated operating results.
Our portfolio strategy allows the impact of significant changes in one country to be sometimes offset by opposing changes in other countries, leading to no significant impacts on consolidated figures. The impact of these factors on us, for the years covered by this report, is discussed below.
a. Hydrological Conditions
A substantial part of our generation capacity depends on the hydrological conditions prevailing in the countries where we operate, although only extreme hydrological conditions materially affect the Companys operating results and financial condition. In terms of installed capacity, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, 60%, 58% and 58% of Endesa Chiles consolidated installed capacity, respectively, has been hydroelectric. Consolidated hydroelectric capacity was 7,985 MW as of December 31, 2008, 7,989 MW as of December 31, 2009 and 8,010 MW as of December 31, 2010. (See Item 4. Information on the Company A. History and Development of the Company).
Hydrological conditions for 2008, 2009 and 2010 have not led to significant changes in our financial condition and results from operations. Hydroelectric generation was 32,297 GWh in 2008, 34,911GWh in 2009 and 30,258 GWh in 2010. The lower hydroelectric generation in 2010 was associated with lower hydrological conditions in Chile, Argentina and Peru as compared to the previous year. Consolidated operating income was Ch$ 874 billion in 2008, Ch$ 1,017 billion in 2009 and Ch$ 891 billion in 2010.
Our thermal generators burn natural gas, LNG, coal, or diesel. We can offset the effect of low hydrology (reservoir levels, rain and snow), in the geographical areas where we operate our plants by thermal generation and purchases. The companys thermal installed capacity and the ability to purchase electricity from other generators allow us to increase thermal generation and/or purchase electricity from competitors to meet our commitments. In addition, given industry structure and the percentage of hydroelectric generation capacity in the countries where we operate, when hydrology is low, electricity prices generally increase. Under certain circumstances, low hydrology could potentially lead to higher revenues and sometimes, higher operating income.
Operating costs of thermal generation and energy purchases are higher than the variable cost of hydroelectric generation, in normal hydrological conditions. The cost of thermal generation does not directly depend on hydrology, but instead on
global commodity prices. However, the cost of electricity purchases in the spot market does depend on hydrology and commodity prices.
The impact of low hydrology on operating results depends on the sensitivity or reaction to electricity prices in the market, the severity of the impact of hydrological conditions on the Companys hydroelectric generation, the Companys cost of thermal generation and the need for energy purchases. The effect of low hydrology on market prices may either partially or completely compensate (depending on the conditions of all relevant market factors) for the higher cost of sales, leading to an insignificant impact on operating results. For additional information on the effects of hydrological conditions on our operating results, see Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Since our generation business depends heavily on hydrological conditions, drought conditions may hurt our profitability.
b. Regulatory Developments
The regulatory frameworks governing our business in the five countries where we operate have a material effect on our results from operations. In particular, regulators set generation tariffs taking into consideration factors such as fuel costs, reservoir levels, exchange rates, future investments in installed capacity and demand growth, all of which are intended to allow companies to earn a regulated level of return on their investment, and guarantee quality service and reliability. The earnings of our electricity subsidiaries are determined to a large degree by government regulators, mainly through the tariff setting process. For additional information relating to the regulatory frameworks in the countries where we operate, see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework.
c. Economic Conditions
Macroeconomic conditions in the countries in which we operate may have a significant effect on our operating results. For example, when a country experiences sustained economic growth, consumption of electricity by industrial and individual consumers increases. Other macroeconomic factors such as the variation of the local currency exchange rate against the dollar, may affects revenues and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, depending on the percentage denominated in dollars. For example, a devaluation of local currencies against the dollar increases the cost of capital expenditure plans. For additional information, see Item 3. Key Information D. Risk factors Foreign exchange risks may adversely affect our results and the dollar value of dividends payable to ADS holders and South American economic fluctuations are likely to affect our results from operations and financial condition, as well as the value of our securities.
Economic Growth and Electricity Demand
Economic growth in 2010 was strong in all of the countries in which we operate, largely based on domestic private consumptions and investment. The worldwide financial and economic crisis adversely impacted developed economies, but Latin America showed resilience to global threats and the outlook remains better than for the developed world. According to the IMFs October 2010 Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere, the estimated 2011 GDP growth for Latin America and the Caribbean (simple average) is 4.0%. Brazil, Chile, Peru and Colombia are expected to lead the way. Nonetheless, there are several risks to the outlook. The main risk is inflation pressure in these economies. Most commodity-exporting countries in Latin America are facing highly favorable conditions, and particularly those with stronger fundamentals, who have easiest access to external financing and stand to benefit the most from low global interest rates. Capital inflows to the region are accelerating and should stay strong throughout 2011. The political outlook in Argentina is highly uncertain, but the near term risk for that economy remains overheated growth.
Demand for electricity in 2010 was also higher compared to 2009 due to the economic recovery in most of those countries. The GDP and electricity growth rate for the years covered by this report are included in the following table:
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
GDP |
|
Electricity |
|
GDP |
|
Electricity |
|
GDP |
|
Electricity |
|
Chile (1) |
|
3.7 |
|
0.3 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
0.5 |
|
5.2 |
|
3.4 |
|
Argentina |
|
6.8 |
|
2.9 |
|
0.9 |
|
(1.3 |
) |
7.5 |
|
5.9 |
|
Colombia |
|
2.7 |
|
1.9 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.5 |
|
4.7 |
|
2.6 |
|
Brazil |
|
5.1 |
|
2.8 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
7.5 |
|
7.1 |
|
Peru |
|
9.8 |
|
9.5 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.9 |
|
8.3 |
|
8.5 |
|
Source: GDP growth data was obtained from the Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere (October 2010) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Electricity demand growth data was obtained from internal Company physical energy data.
(1) Electricity demand growth in the SIC and the SING.
Local Currency Exchange Rate
Variations in the parity of the dollar and the local currency in each of the countries in which we have operations may have an impact on our operating results and overall financial position. The impact will depend on the level at which tariffs are pegged to the dollar, dollar-denominated assets and liabilities existing in the period and the translation of Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company to the presentation currency, which is the Chilean peso.
As of December 31, 2010, Endesa Chile had total consolidated indebtedness of $ 3,775 million, of which 57.3% was denominated in dollars, 25.0% is in Colombian pesos, 12.0% denominated in pesos, 3.0% in Argentine pesos, and 2.5% in soles.
The following table sets forth the closing and average local currencies per dollar exchange rates for the periods indicated:
|
|
Local Currency Dollar Exchange Rates |
| ||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Year End |
|
Average |
|
Year End |
|
Average |
|
Year End |
|
Chile (peso per dollar) |
|
521.8 |
|
636.45 |
|
559.15 |
|
507.10 |
|
510.22 |
|
468.01 |
|
Argentina (Argentine peso per dollar) |
|
3.16 |
|
3.45 |
|
3.77 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.92 |
|
3.98 |
|
Colombia (Colombian peso per dollar) |
|
1,963 |
|
2,246 |
|
2,155 |
|
2,044 |
|
1,895 |
|
1,914 |
|
Brazil (reais per dollar) |
|
1.83 |
|
2.34 |
|
2.00 |
|
1.74 |
|
1.69 |
|
1.66 |
|
Peru (sol per dollar) |
|
2.92 |
|
3.14 |
|
3.01 |
|
2.89 |
|
2.81 |
|
2.81 |
|
(1) Sources: Central Bank of each country.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, our revenues amounted to $ 5,206 billion, of which approximately 12.5% were denominated in dollars and approximately 53.6% were linked in some way to the dollar. In respect of the total balance, the equivalent of $ 824 million was denominated in Colombian pesos, $ 753 million was in Argentine pesos, $ 128 million was in pesos, and $ 59 million was in soles.
d. Critical Accounting Policies
Financial Reporting Release Section 501.1 encourages all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect significant judgments and uncertainties, which would potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below with reference to the preparation of our financial statements under IFRS.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
During the period, and principally at period end, the Company evaluates whether there is any indication that an asset has been impaired. Should any such indication exist, the company estimates the recoverable amount of that asset to determine, where appropriate, the amount of impairment. In the case of identifiable assets that do not independently generate cash flows, the company estimates the recoverability of the Cash Generating Unit to which the asset belongs, which is understood to be the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the case of Cash Generating Units to which goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life have been allocated, a recoverability analysis is performed routinely at each period end.
The recoverable amount is the greater between the fair value less the cost needed to sell and the value in use, which is defined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In order to calculate the recoverable value of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, value in use criteria is used by the Group in practically all cases.
To estimate the value in use, the Group prepares future cash flow projections, before tax, based on the most recently available budgets. These budgets incorporate managements best estimates of revenue and costs of Cash Generating Units using sector projections, past experience and future expectations.
In general, these projections cover the next ten years, estimating cash flows for subsequent years by applying reasonable growth rates between 3.3% and 6.7% that, in no case, are increasing nor exceed the average long term growth rates for the particular sector and country.
These cash flows are discounted at a given pre-tax rate in order to calculate their present value. This rate reflects the cost of capital of the business and the geographical area in which it is carried on. In order to calculate it, the current time value of money and the risk premiums generally used by analysts for the business and the geographical area are taken into account.
The discount rates, before tax, expressed in nominal terms and applied in 2010 and 2009 are the following:
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Chile |
|
pesos |
|
9.2% |
|
9.5% |
|
7.5% |
|
8.7% |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine pesos |
|
19.5% |
|
16.8% |
|
16.9% |
| ||
Brazil |
|
Brazilian reais |
|
11.3% |
|
9.6% |
|
10.8% |
| ||
Peru |
|
soles |
|
9.1% |
|
7.9% |
| ||||
Colombia |
|
Colombian pesos |
|
11.5% |
|
9.6% |
|
If the recoverable amount is less than the net carrying amount of the asset, the corresponding provision for impairment loss is recorded for the difference, and charged to Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Impairment losses recognized for an asset in prior periods are reversed when its estimated recoverable amount changes, increasing the assets value with a credit to earnings, limited to the assets carrying amount if no adjustment had occurred. In the case of goodwill, adjustments that have been made are not reversible.
Litigation and Contingencies
The Company is currently involved in some legal and tax proceedings. As discussed in Note 20.2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2010, we have estimated the probable outflows of resources of resolving these claims. We have reached this estimate after consulting our legal and tax advisors who are carrying out our defense in these matters and an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies.
Hedges Revenues Directly Linked to the Dollar
The Company has established a policy to hedge the portion of its revenues directly linked to the dollar by obtaining financing in this currency. Exchange differences related to this debt, as they are cash flow hedge transactions, are charged, net of taxes, to an equity reserve account and recorded as income during the period in which the hedged cash flows are realized. This term has been estimated at ten years.
This policy reflects a detailed analysis of our future dollar revenue streams. Such analysis may change in the future due to new electricity regulations limiting the amount of revenues tied to the dollar.
Pension and Post-Employment Benefits Liabilities
We have various defined benefits plans for our employees. These plans pay benefits to employees at retirement and use formulas based on years of service and the compensation of the participants. We also offer certain additional benefits for some retired employees in particular.
The liabilities shown for the pensions and post-employment benefits reflect our best estimate of the future cost of meeting our obligations under these plans. The accounting applied to these defined benefit plans involves actuarial calculations which contain key assumptions that include: employee turnover, life expectancy and retirement ages, discount rates, expected returns on assets, the future level of compensation and benefits, the claims rate under medical plans and future medical costs. These assumptions change as economic and market conditions vary and any change in any of these assumptions could have an important effect on the reported results from operations.
The effect of an increase of one percentage point in the discount rate used to determine the present value of the post-employment defined benefits would decrease the liability by Ch$ 2,311 million in 2010, Ch$ 2,525 million in 2009 and Ch$ 2,723 million in 2008 and the effect of a decrease of one percentage point in the rate used to determine the present value of the post-employment defined benefits would increase the liability by Ch$ 2,817 million in 2010, Ch$ 2,175 million in 2009 and Ch$ 2,923 million in 2008.
For further detail of the main accounting policies and the methods used in the preparation of the financial statements, see Notes 2 and 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Item 18. Financial Statements Note 2.2 for additional information regarding recent accounting pronouncement.
2. Country by Country Comparative Analysis of Operating and Non-Operating Results for 2009 and 2010
Revenues from operations
The following table sets forth the revenues by country, as a percentage of total consolidated revenues for years 2009 and 2010:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(as a % of total) |
| ||
Chile |
|
56.8 |
|
55.2 |
|
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
1.5 |
|
0.8 |
|
Argentina |
|
12.3 |
|
14.5 |
|
Colombia |
|
20.7 |
|
20.8 |
|
Peru |
|
8.8 |
|
8.7 |
|
Total Consolidated Revenues |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
Endesa Chiles revenues from operations that were not related to its electricity business accounted for 0.8% of total consolidated revenues from operations in 2010. We consider those revenues to be immaterial and believe that they do not affect the analysis of the companys Consolidated Financial Statements. These revenues come mainly from engineering
consulting services and a tunnel concession. The tables below sets forth the breakdown by country of Endesa Chiles total revenues from operations, the volume of GWh sales for 2009 and 2010 and the percentage changes year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
Revenues |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Generation (Chile) (1) |
|
1,373,231 |
|
1,345,371 |
|
(2.0 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) (1) |
|
35,418 |
|
19,734 |
|
(44.3 |
) |
Argentina(2) |
|
296,578 |
|
352,358 |
|
18.8 |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
231,422 |
|
295,231 |
|
27.6 |
|
El Chocón |
|
65,298 |
|
57,173 |
|
(12.4 |
) |
Colombia |
|
500,964 |
|
507,516 |
|
1.3 |
|
Peru |
|
213,625 |
|
211,261 |
|
(1.1 |
) |
Consolidated Adjustments Foreign Subs |
|
(897 |
) |
(858 |
) |
4.4 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
2,418,919 |
|
2,435,382 |
|
0.7 |
|
(1) |
The differences in Generation and Other business in Chile compared to last years Form 20-F are explained by internal reclassifications introduced during 2010. |
(2) |
The sum of the revenues of Endesa Costanera and El Chocón differs from the total revenue disclosed for Argentina, due to adjustments in our Argentine investment vehicles. |
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
Energy Sales |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
Chile |
|
22,327 |
|
21,847 |
|
(2.1 |
) |
Argentina |
|
12,405 |
|
11,378 |
|
(8.3 |
) |
Endesa Costanera |
|
8,284 |
|
8,018 |
|
(3.2 |
) |
El Chocón |
|
4,122 |
|
3,361 |
|
(18.5 |
) |
Colombia |
|
16,806 |
|
14,817 |
|
(11.8 |
) |
Peru |
|
8,321 |
|
8,598 |
|
3.3 |
|
Total |
|
59,859 |
|
56,641 |
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
Energy Produced |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
Chile |
|
22,239 |
|
20,914 |
|
(6.0 |
) |
Argentina |
|
11,955 |
|
10,940 |
|
(8.5 |
) |
Endesa Costanera |
|
8,172 |
|
7,965 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
El Chocón |
|
3,783 |
|
2,975 |
|
(21.3 |
) |
Colombia |
|
12,674 |
|
11,283 |
|
(11.0 |
) |
Peru |
|
8,163 |
|
8,466 |
|
3.7 |
|
Total |
|
55,030 |
|
51,603 |
|
(6.2 |
) |
Revenues from operations in Chile in 2010 decreased 2.0%, mainly as a result of a decrease of 2.1% in physical sales, due to the lower electricity demand in Chile after the earthquake that took place on February 27, 2010, and lower average prices expressed in terms of pesos, which fell by 2.6%. In 2010, there were lower sales in the spot market due to reduced hydrology, partially offset by higher sales to contracted customers, which was a result of improved economic conditions, and a recovery in demand by the end of 2010 as compared to 2009.
Total revenues from operations in Argentina increased by 18.8% in 2010, from Ch$ 296.6 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 352.4 billion in 2010. This better result is explained by higher revenues from sales due to a 28.5% increase in the average sale price, which more than offset the 8.3% reduction in sales volumes.
Endesa Costaneras revenues from sales rose by 27.6%, though physical sales declined by 3.2%, explained by a 30.7% increase in the companys average energy sale price. El Chocóns generation decreased 21.3% compared to 2009 due to
lower hydroelectric availability, as a result of reservoir control at levels limited by each river basin, causing operating revenues to decrease by Ch$ 8,125 million, from Ch$ 65,298 million in 2009 to Ch$ 57,173 million in 2010.
The currency translation effect is the net effect obtained when translating the results from the local currency of each country to pesos. The currency translation effect of converting the financial statements from the Argentine peso to the Chilean peso in both companies was negative, leading to a 13.6% decrease in revenues in peso terms. For additional information of our principal customers in Argentina see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Total revenues from operations in Colombia increased by 1.3%, from Ch$ 501 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 507.5 billion in 2010. The higher revenues from sales of Ch$ 6.6 billion is explained by a 10% increase in average energy sales prices, which more than offset the 11.8% reduction in physical sales.
The currency translation effect was positive, producing an increase of 2.7% in revenues in peso terms over 2009. For additional information of our principal distribution and trading customers in Colombia see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Revenues from operations in Peru decreased by 1.1% from Ch$ 213.6 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 211.3 billion in 2010, mainly the result of a 5.6% decrease in the average energy sale price associated with the reduction in sales to unregulated customers. This was partially offset by larger sales to regulated customers and to the spot market.
The currency translation effect of converting the financial statements from soles to the Chilean peso in both periods produces a reduction in Chilean pesos of 2.2% in 2010 with respect to 2009. For additional information of our principal customers in Peru see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Operating Expenses
The table below sets forth the breakdown by country of operating expenses for 2009 and 2010 and the percentage change from year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Raw materials and consumable used (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) (2) |
|
511,522 |
|
666,599 |
|
(30.3 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
3 |
|
210 |
|
(6,514.4 |
) |
Argentina |
|
208,539 |
|
267,824 |
|
(28.4 |
) |
Endesa Costanera |
|
190,815 |
|
250,349 |
|
(31.2 |
) |
El Chocón |
|
17,724 |
|
17,475 |
|
1.4 |
|
Colombia |
|
184,067 |
|
176,664 |
|
4.0 |
|
Peru |
|
72,014 |
|
80,241 |
|
(11.4 |
) |
Consolidated Adjustments Foreign Subs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
976,146 |
|
1,191,328 |
|
(22.0 |
) |
(1) Excludes Selling, General and Administrative expenses.
(2) Includes all subsidiaries and investment vehicles in Chile.
Operating expenses in the generation business in Chile increased by 30.3% in 2010 compared to 2009, as a result of lower hydroelectric generation and higher thermal generation. In 2010, 89% of our total thermal production burned LNG, which allowed us to replace more inefficient and expensive fuels. However, energy purchases costs grew by 166% in the period and transportation costs increased by 50.2%.
Operating expenses in Argentina increased by Ch$ 59.3 billion, from Ch$ 208.5 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 267.8 billion in 2010. This is mainly the result of greater fuel consumption cost of Ch$ 62.7 billion for Endesa Costanera. The currency translation effect resulted in a 13.6% decrease in peso terms.
Colombias operating expenses decreased by 4.0%, from Ch$ 184.1 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 176.7 billion in 2010, mainly due to lower energy purchase costs. These were partially offset by higher fuel purchases costs, as a result of lower hydrology
in the first half of 2010. The currency translation effect was positive, producing an increase of 2.7% in operating expenses in peso terms over 2009.
Operating expenses in Peru increased by 11.4% from Ch$ 72.0 billion in 2009 to Ch$ 80.2 billion in 2010. This is mainly explained by an increase of Ch$ 9.8 billion in fuel consumption and energy purchase costs. This principally reflects the absence of the non-recurring reversal of provisions for energy purchases for distribution customers without contract, booked in 2009, and, to a lesser extent, by higher average energy purchase prices that more than offset the 9.3% reduction in physical purchases. The currency translation effect was negative, producing a reduction in Chilean pesos of 2.2% in 2010 with respect to 2009.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses are related to salaries, compensation, administrative expenses, and office materials and supplies. These expenses decreased by Ch$ 12.1 billion in 2010.
The table below sets forth the breakdown of selling and administrative expenses for 2009 and 2010 and the percentage change from year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Selling and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) (1) |
|
81,484 |
|
81,834 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) (1) |
|
25,749 |
|
12,557 |
|
51.2 |
|
Argentina(2) |
|
22,445 |
|
24,673 |
|
(9.9 |
) |
Endesa Costanera |
|
17,368 |
|
19,690 |
|
(13.4 |
) |
El Chocón |
|
5,090 |
|
4,940 |
|
(2.9 |
) |
Colombia |
|
29,569 |
|
32,734 |
|
(10.7 |
) |
Peru |
|
27,350 |
|
22,677 |
|
17.1 |
|
Consolidated Adjustment Foreign Subs |
|
(897 |
) |
(858 |
) |
4.3 |
|
Total Selling and Administrative Expense |
|
185,701 |
|
173,616 |
|
6.5 |
|
(1) |
The differences in Generation and Other business in Chile compared to last years Form 20-F are explained by internal reclassifications introduced during 2010. |
(2) |
The sum of the Selling and Administrative Expenses of Endesa Costanera and El Chocón differs from the total Selling and Administrative Expense disclosed for Argentina due to the expenses in our Argentine investment vehicles. |
Approximately 54.4% of total Selling and administrative expenses are concentrated in Chile, between the generation business and other business, showing a decrease in 2010 over 2009.
Operating Margin and Operating Income
Our operating margin, or operating income as a percentage of revenues, decreased from 42.0% in 2009 to 36.6% in 2010. This decrease is due to lower operating margins reported in Chile, Argentina and Peru, partially offset by a higher operating margin in Colombia. The following is our operating margin by country:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Operating Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
46.7 |
% |
37.9 |
% |
Argentina |
|
14.5 |
% |
12.0 |
% |
Colombia |
|
50.1 |
% |
51.5 |
% |
Peru |
|
35.6 |
% |
33.2 |
% |
Total Operating Margin |
|
42.0 |
% |
36.6 |
% |
Endesa Chiles consolidated operating income was Ch$ 1,017 billion in 2009 and decreased to Ch$ 890.7 billion in 2010. The main reason behind this 12.4% decrease is the combination of lower energy sales combined with higher energy purchases and fuel costs.
The following table breaks down operating income by country for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) |
|
640,040 |
|
512,769 |
|
(19.9 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
7,080 |
|
3,881 |
|
(45.2 |
) |
Argentina |
|
42,951 |
|
42,402 |
|
(1,3 |
) |
Colombia |
|
250,811 |
|
261,537 |
|
4.3 |
|
Peru |
|
76,049 |
|
70,134 |
|
(7.8 |
) |
Consolidated Adjustment Foreign Subs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
1,016,931 |
|
890,724 |
|
(12.4 |
) |
Non-operating Results
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our consolidated non-operating results for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Financial results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income |
|
25,316 |
|
10,083 |
|
(60.2 |
) |
Financial costs |
|
(188,368 |
) |
(142,256 |
) |
24.5 |
|
Income (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
9,275 |
|
(3,163 |
) |
N/A |
|
Foreign currency exchange differences |
|
(17,017 |
) |
15,619 |
|
191.8 |
|
Total |
|
(170,794 |
) |
(119,717 |
) |
29.9 |
|
Other non-operating results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the profit (loss) of associates accounted for using the equity method |
|
98,458 |
|
91,674 |
|
(6.9 |
) |
Net income from other investments |
|
(90 |
) |
273 |
|
402.1 |
|
Net income from sales of assets |
|
65 |
|
1,621 |
|
2,395.6 |
|
Total |
|
98,433 |
|
93,568 |
|
(4.9 |
) |
Total non-operating results |
|
(72,361 |
) |
(26,149 |
) |
63.9 |
|
The companys financial result as of December 2010 amounted to a loss of Ch$ 119.7 billion, a 29.9% loss reduction compared to 2009 when the loss amounted to Ch$ 170.8 billion. The main changes in this result were due to reduced financial expenses of Ch$ 46.1 billion, principally due to lower financial cost in Colombia and Peru, and a lower level of debt. In addition, there was a gain of Ch$ 15.6 billion in exchange differences as of December 2010, compared to a net loss of Ch$ 17.0 billion in December 2009. This was mainly in Chile, as a result of the lower value of the peso against the dollar, which affected the asset denominated in dollars, and in Argentina, due to the conversion into dollars of the FONINVEMEN collection rights.
The gains above were partially offset by a decrease of Ch$ 12.4 billion from the indexation of debt denominated in Unidades de Fomento in Chile as a result of higher inflation, and by reduced financial income of Ch$ 15.2 billion.
The share of the profit of associates accounted for using the equity method amounted to Ch$ 91.7 billion as of December 2010, a reduction of 6.9% compared to December 2009. This result mainly reflects the proportional participation in the results of the associate company Endesa Brasil S.A., whose contribution amounted to Ch$ 90.7 billion.
As a result of all the foregoing, total non-operating results as of December 2010 amounted to a loss of Ch$ 72,361 billion, a 63.9% loss reduction compared to December 2009 when the loss amounted to Ch$ 26,149 billion.
Net Income
The following table sets forth our net income for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$, except percentages) |
| ||||
Net income before tax |
|
944,569 |
|
864,575 |
|
(8.5 |
) |
Income tax |
|
(172,468 |
) |
(179,964 |
) |
(4.3 |
) |
Net income |
|
772,100 |
|
684,611 |
|
(11.3 |
) |
Net income attributable to owners of parent |
|
627,053 |
|
533,556 |
|
(14.9 |
) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
145,047 |
|
151,055 |
|
4.1 |
|
Income taxes in 2010 rose by 4.3%, the equivalent of Ch$ 7.5 billion, compared to 2009.
3. Country by Country Comparative Analysis of Operating and Non-Operating Results for 2008 and 2009
Revenues from operations
The following table sets forth the revenues by country, as a percentage of total consolidated revenues for years 2008 and 2009:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(as a % of total) |
| ||
Chile |
|
63.4 |
|
56.8 |
|
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
1.3 |
|
1.5 |
|
Argentina |
|
11.2 |
|
12.3 |
|
Colombia |
|
15.8 |
|
20.7 |
|
Peru |
|
8.2 |
|
8.8 |
|
Total Consolidated Revenues |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
Endesa Chiles revenues from operations that were not related to its electricity business accounted for 1.6% of total consolidated revenues from operations in 2009. We consider those revenues to be immaterial and believe that they do not affect the analysis of the companys Consolidated Financial Statements. These revenues come mainly from engineering consulting services and a tunnel concession. The tables below sets forth the breakdown by country of Endesa Chiles total revenues from operations, the volume of GWh sales for 2008 and 2009 and the percentage changes year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Generation (Chile) (1) |
|
1,609,158 |
|
1,373,231 |
|
(14.7 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) (1) |
|
33,035 |
|
35,418 |
|
(7.2 |
) |
Argentina |
|
284,228 |
|
296,578 |
|
4.3 |
|
Colombia |
|
401,470 |
|
500,964 |
|
24.8 |
|
Peru |
|
208,497 |
|
213,625 |
|
2.5 |
|
Consolidated Adjustments Foreign Subs |
|
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
2,536,388 |
|
2,418,919 |
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
Energy Sales |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
(GWh) |
|
Chile (1) |
|
21,532 |
|
22,327 |
|
3.7 |
|
Argentina |
|
11,098 |
|
12,405 |
|
11.8 |
|
Colombia |
|
16,368 |
|
16,806 |
|
2.7 |
|
Peru |
|
8,461 |
|
8,321 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
Total |
|
57,458 |
|
59,859 |
|
4.2 |
|
(1) With the adoption of IFRS, energy sales in 2008 and 2009 include 50% of GasAtacama.
Total 2009 generation revenues from operations in Chile decreased by 14.7% from Ch$ 1,609 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 1,373 billion in 2009, mainly as a result of lower prices, which in turn can be explained by lower costs. The increase in physical sales was 3.7%, mainly explained by a 25.6% increase in energy sales to the spot market that reached 4,183 GWh. In the spot market, the average energy market price during 2009 was $ 104 per MWh in the SIC, compared to $ 207 in 2008, due to the impact of lower commodity prices and better hydrology. Sales to regulated customers decreased by 1.6% at the node price, which is the result of a price-setting system that reflects the new energy matrix in Chile. The sales mix in 2009 at regulated, spot and unregulated prices was 53%, 28% and 19%, respectively. The total average sales price of Endesa Chile in Chile decreased by 22%, from $ 139 per MWh in 2008 to $ 108 per MWh in 2009.
The currency translation effect is the net effect obtained when translating the results from the local currency of each country to pesos.
Total revenues from operations in Argentina increased by 4.3% in 2009, from Ch$ 284.2 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 296.6 billion in 2009. This improvement was the result of 11.8% higher physical sales during 2009. Physical energy sales from El Chocón amounted to 4,122 GWh, a 61.4% increase from 2008, attributable to better hydrological conditions during 2009. The average sales price for El Chocón was Ar$ 106.7 per MWh in 2009, 0.2% higher than the year before. Energy sold by Endesa Costanera decreased by 3.0% to 8,284 GWh in 2009. The average sales price in Endesa Costanera, expressed in pesos, increased by 7.5% during the year, reaching an average of Ar$ 186 per MWh. Revenues in Argentina had an 8.5% decrease due to the currency translation effect. In Argentina, the sales mix at spot and unregulated markets was 83% and 17%, respectively. For additional information of our principal customers in Argentina, see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Total revenues from operations in Colombia increased by 24.8%, from Ch$ 401.5 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 501.0 billion in 2009, mainly due to a 24% increase in average sales price in local currency to CPs 114 per kWh in 2009 (due to low hydrology), as well as by a 2.7% increase in physical sales. The sales mix in 2009 at regulated, spot and unregulated prices was 56%, 29% and 15%, respectively. The currency translation effect, given the exchange rate fluctuations against the dollar in Colombia and Chile, resulted in a decrease in revenues in pesos of 2.2%. For additional information of our principal distribution and trading customers in Colombia, see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Revenues from operations in Peru increased by 2.5%, from Ch$ 208.5 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 213.6 billion in 2009, mainly attributable to the currency translation effect. This effect made revenues in pesos increase by 4.5%. Additionally, physical energy sales decreased by 1.7% and average prices, expressed in local currency, decreased by 3.5%, reaching 131 soles per MWh in 2009. The sales mix at regulated, spot and unregulated prices was 49%, 9% and 42%, respectively. For additional information of our principal customers in Peru, see Item 4. Information on the Company B. Business Overview.
Operating Expenses
The table below sets forth the breakdown by country of operating expenses for 2008 and 2009 and the percentage change from year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Raw materials and consumable used (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) (2) |
|
871,056 |
|
511,522 |
|
41.3 |
|
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
15 |
|
3 |
|
80.0 |
|
Argentina |
|
206,240 |
|
208,539 |
|
(1.1 |
) |
Colombia |
|
128,688 |
|
184,067 |
|
(43.0 |
) |
Peru |
|
98,453 |
|
72,014 |
|
26.9 |
|
Consolidated Adjustments Foreign Subs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
1,304,453 |
|
976,146 |
|
25.2 |
|
(1) Excludes Selling, General and Administrative expenses.
(2) Includes all subsidiaries and investment vehicles in Chile.
Operating expenses in the generation business in Chile decreased by 41.3% in 2009 compared to 2008, because of higher hydroelectric generation and lower thermal generation using diesel at lower costs. However, we continued to have natural gas restrictions from Argentina during most of 2009 until September, when the LNG re-gasification terminal started to operate in its early phase. Fuel costs in Chile decreased by 43% or Ch$ 260.7 billion during 2009. The average variable generation cost, excluding the cost of energy purchases, dropped 40.2%, from Ch$ 34.6 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 20.7 per kWh in 2009, as a result of the 1.8% decrease in thermal electric generation due to better hydrological conditions and to lower average global fuel prices. The cost of electricity purchases decreased from Ch$ 134.9 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 52.3 billion, due to a decrease in physical energy purchases of 22.7%. The average cost of purchases decreased from Ch$ 193.3 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 98.2 per kWh in 2009.
Operating expenses in Argentina increased by Ch$ 2.3 billion, from Ch$ 206.2 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 208.5 billion in 2009. Given the improvement of hydrological conditions, hydroelectric generation increased by 95.0% while thermoeletric generation decreased by 4.3%. The fuel cost slightly increased by 0.6%, despite lower production during 2009. The average variable generation cost decreased from Ch$ 18.5 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 16.7 per kWh in 2009. Electricity purchases decreased by Ch$ 2.7 billion in 2009, due to a 23.8% decrease in physical energy purchases in the spot market. The purchases were at an average purchase cost of Ch$ 17.7 per kWh in 2009. The combined effect of the fluctuations of the peso and the Argentine peso against the dollar decreased total operating expenses in pesos by 8.5%.
Operating expenses in Colombia increased by 43.0%, from Ch$ 128.7 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 184.1 billion in 2009, primarily because of higher costs of energy purchases and higher fuel costs as the lower hydrological conditions during 2009 led to more thermal generation. The average variable generation cost increased from Ch$ 6.3 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 7.3 per kWh in 2009. Electricity purchases increased by Ch$ 44.8 billion in 2009 because of the higher volume of energy purchased and higher average purchase cost that increased from Ch$ 13.1 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 21.5 per kWh in 2009. The combination of a fluctuation of the local currency and the peso against the dollar in 2009 resulted in a net reduction of 2.2% of operating costs in pesos.
Operating expenses in Peru decreased by 26.9% from Ch$ 98.5 billion in 2008 to Ch$ 72.0 billion in 2009. This was primarily due to a more efficient production mix, driven by better hydrological conditions that led to lower fuel costs and lower costs of energy purchases. The average variable generation cost was Ch$ 8.4 per kWh in 2008 compared to Ch$ 7.5 per kWh in 2009, and the average purchase cost decreased from Ch$ 57.8 per kWh in 2008 to Ch$ 31.7 per kWh in 2009. The effect of converting the soles to pesos, given the exchange rate fluctuations of each currency against the dollar, caused operating expenses in pesos increase by 4.5%.
Administrative and Selling Expenses
Administrative and selling expenses are related to salaries, compensation, administrative expenses, and office materials and supplies. These expenses increased by Ch$ 14.5 billion in 2009.
The table below sets forth the breakdown of administrative and selling expenses for 2008 and 2009 and the percentage change from year to year:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Administrative and Selling Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) (1) |
|
74,405 |
|
81,484 |
|
(9.5 |
) |
Other businesses (Chile) (1) |
|
30,066 |
|
25,749 |
|
14.4 |
|
Argentina |
|
20,019 |
|
22,445 |
|
(12.1 |
) |
Colombia |
|
25,403 |
|
29,569 |
|
(16.4 |
) |
Peru |
|
22,038 |
|
27,350 |
|
(24.1 |
) |
Consolidated Adjustment Foreign Subs |
|
(764 |
) |
(897 |
) |
(17.3 |
) |
Total Selling and Administrative Expense |
|
171,167 |
|
185,701 |
|
(8.5 |
) |
(1) |
The differences in Generation and Other business in Chile compared to last years Form 20-F are explained by internal reclassifications introduced during 2010. |
Approximately 58% of total administrative and selling expenses are in Chile, between the generation business and other businesses. The net increase in 2009 over 2008 was primarily due to higher compensation paid to employees, which also explains the overall 8.5% increase in other countries as well.
Operating Margin and Operating Income
Our operating margin, or operating income as a percentage of revenues, increased from 34.5% in 2008 to 42.0% in 2009. This increase is due to higher operating margins reported in Peru, Chile, and to a lower degree, Argentina, partially offset by a lower operating margin in Colombia. The following is our operating margin by country:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
Operating Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
35.4 |
% |
46.7 |
% |
Argentina |
|
13.1 |
% |
14.5 |
% |
Colombia |
|
54.0 |
% |
50.1 |
% |
Peru |
|
24.8 |
% |
35.6 |
% |
Total Operating Margin |
|
34.5 |
% |
42.0 |
% |
Endesa Chiles consolidated operating income reached Ch$ 1,017 billion in 2009 compared to Ch$ 874.2 billion in 2008. The main reason behind this 16.3% increase was the decrease in our operating costs. The following table breaks down operating income by country for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation (Chile) |
|
567,737 |
|
640,040 |
|
12.7 |
|
Other businesses (Chile) |
|
(212 |
) |
7,080 |
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
37,284 |
|
42,951 |
|
15.2 |
|
Colombia |
|
216,818 |
|
250,811 |
|
15.7 |
|
Peru |
|
51,772 |
|
76,049 |
|
46.9 |
|
Consolidated Adjustment Foreign Subs |
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
874,164 |
|
1,016,931 |
|
16.3 |
|
In Chile, operating income for the generation business for 2009 amounted to Ch$ 640.0 billion, a 12.7% increase over 2008, despite the non-recurrent write-off for obsolete assets of a total amount of Ch$ 44.0 billion. This growth in operating income is mainly explained by a 41.3% decrease in operating costs as a result of the positive hydrology conditions in effect
during 2009, which improved the production mix. This led to a 61.2% lower cost of energy purchases and to a reduction of fuel costs by 43.0%, which explains the increase of the operating margin from 35.4% in 2008 to 46.7% in 2009.
In Argentina, operating income reached Ch$ 43.0 billion in 2009, compared to Ch$ 37.3 billion reported the year before, a 15.2% increase. Endesa Costaneras operating income amounted to Ch$ 4.4 billion, 76% below 2008. Physical sales fell by 3%, which basically explains the decrease of revenues by 4% in 2009 as compared to 2008. Operating costs of the company increased by 1%, driven by higher consumption of fuel and the increase of energy purchases. In El Chocón, reservoirs showed higher levels accumulated in the early months of 2009, thus providing greater hydroelectric generation throughout the year. This hydroelectric plant generated 1,843 GWh more in 2009 than in 2008. With this, El Chocón improved its operating income to Ch$ 38.7 billion as of December 2009, which was 103.4% higher than the previous year with physical sales increasing by 61.4% compared to 2008.
Overall, the production mix in Argentina improved, increasing the operating margin from 13.1% in 2008 to 14.5% in 2009, driven by El Chocón.
Operating income of our business in Colombia reached Ch$ 250.8 billion during 2009, a 15.7% increase over 2008. This is mainly explained by an increase of average prices measured in local currency as a result of lower hydrological conditions during the period as well as an increase of physical sales of 3% over 2008. Hydro generation for Emgesa decreased by a 703 GWh in 2009 as result of the lower hydrology related with the El Niño phenomenon. This situation led to a weaker production mix and a 43% increase in operating costs, because energy purchases and fuel consumption expenses for thermal generation increased. All these elements explain the decrease of Colombias operating margin from 54.0% in 2008 to 50.1% in 2009.
Operating income in Peru increased by 46.9% as of December 2009, which amounted to Ch$ 76.0 billion, compared to Ch$ 51.8 billion in 2008. This is mainly explained by a better production mix because of the positive hydrological conditions during the year, and hydro generation increased 376 GWh in 2009. This situation allowed a 26.9% decrease in operating costs compared to 2008, due to lower costs of energy purchases and lower fuel consumption at lower average global fuel prices. The latter permitted the operating margin in Peru to increase from 24.8% in 2008 to 35.6% in 2009.
Non-operating Results
According to IFRS, non-operating results have a new classification, composed of Net Financial Results, Net Results From Related Companies and other minor items. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our consolidated non-operating results for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Financial results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income |
|
34,323 |
|
25,316 |
|
(26.2 |
) |
Financial costs |
|
(198,440 |
) |
(188,368 |
) |
(5.1 |
) |
Income (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
(18,950 |
) |
9,275 |
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange differences |
|
(5,828 |
) |
(17,017 |
) |
192.0 |
|
Total |
|
(188,895 |
) |
(170,794 |
) |
(9.6 |
) |
Other non-operating results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the profit (loss) of associates accounted for using the equity method |
|
82,132 |
|
98,458 |
|
19.9 |
|
Net income from other investments |
|
1,016 |
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
Net income from sales of assets |
|
(708 |
) |
65 |
|
109.2 |
|
Total |
|
82,440 |
|
98,433 |
|
19.4 |
|
Total non-operating results |
|
(106,455 |
) |
(72,361 |
) |
(32.0 |
) |
The companys financial result as of December 2009 was a loss of Ch$ 170.8 billion, 9.6% lower than 2008. This is mainly explained by: (i) lower financial expenses of Ch$ 10.1 billion, primarily in Chile, as a result of the lower debt average; (ii) lower interest rates; and (iii) Ch$ 9.3 billion positive results from adjustments of debt denominated in UF that resulted from lower inflation in Chile. This was partially offset by a net loss from exchange rate differences of Ch$ 17.0 billion, which was mainly generated in Chile (while the appreciation of the Chilean peso in relation to the dollar impacted net assets denominated in dollars), and by lower financial income of Ch$ 9.1 billion.
Other results were Ch$ 98.5 billion in December 2009, increasing by 19.9% over 2008. These results mostly reflect the proportional contribution of our affiliate Endesa Brasil, whose equity gain as of December 2009 increased due to better results in CIEN (because of a higher level of energy transmission) and in Endesa Fortaleza (because of higher generation and the growth of physical sales in the spot market). This was partly offset by lower prices in the spot market and the decrease in sales of Cachoeira Dourada. The latter is what mostly explains the increase of our total equity investment result by 20% in 2009.
Net Income
The following table sets forth our net income for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
|
|
(in million of Ch$ , except percentages) |
| ||||
Net income before tax |
|
767,708 |
|
944,569 |
|
23.0 |
|
Income tax |
|
(210,178 |
) |
(172,468 |
) |
(17.9 |
) |
Net income |
|
557,531 |
|
772,100 |
|
38.5 |
|
Net income attributable to owners of parent |
|
433,177 |
|
627,053 |
|
44.8 |
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
124,354 |
|
145,047 |
|
16.6 |
|
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The following discussion of cash sources and uses reflects the key drivers of cash flow for Endesa Chile.
Endesa Chile has a direct ownership in Pehuenche (92.65%), Pangue (94.99%), San Isidro (100%), Endesa Eco (100%) and Celta (100%), which are Endesa Chiles main Chilean consolidated subsidiaries. For the list of main subsidiaries, please see Exhibit 8.1. Additionally, Endesa Chile has a 50% interest in both GasAtacama and Transquillota, and a 51% interest in HidroAysén, which are classified as jointly-controlled companies and therefore consolidated proportionally according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Endesa Chile receives cash inflows from its own operating assets and from its subsidiaries, as well as from related companies in Chile and abroad. Foreign subsidiaries and associates cash flows may not be available to satisfy our own liquidity needs, mainly because they are not wholly-owned, and because there is a time lag before we have effective access to those funds through dividends or capital reductions.
We also have economic interests of 62.5% in our Peruvian subsidiary, Edegel, 26.9% in our Colombian subsidiary, Emgesa (which we control pursuant to a shareholders agreement), 69.8% in our Argentine subsidiary, Endesa Costanera, and 65.4% in our Argentine subsidiary, El Chocón. We consolidate these subsidiaries since we control the majority of the voting rights. We believe that cash flow generated from our business operations, as well as cash balances, borrowings from commercial banks, and ample access to both Chilean and foreign capital markets will suffice to satisfy all our needs for working capital, debt service, dividends and routine capital expenditures.
Set forth below is the consolidated cash flow from an accounting perspective:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
in Ch$ billion |
| ||
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities |
|
996 |
|
856 |
|
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities |
|
(441 |
) |
(416 |
) |
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
|
(800 |
) |
(548 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes |
|
(246 |
) |
(109 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(27 |
) |
(4 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
719 |
|
446 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
446 |
|
333 |
|
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2010, the operating activities of the Company led to a net cash flow of Ch$ 856 billion. The main driver was net income for the period of Ch$ 684.6 billion. See Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects A. Operating Results Net Income. Additionally, cash flow from operations was affected by non-monetary adjustments, primarily depreciation and amortization of Ch$ 179.0 billion.
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2009, the operating activities of the Company led to a net cash flow of Ch$ 995.6 billion. The main driver was net income for the period of Ch$ 772.3 billion. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects A. Operating Results Net Income. Additionally, cash flow from operations was affected by non-monetary adjustments, primarily depreciation and amortization for Ch$ 196.2 billion.
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2010, investment activities generated a negative cash flow of Ch$ 416.5 billion, mostly explained by the additions of fixed and intangible assets for Ch$ 258.8 billion, mainly at Endesa Chile, Endesa Eco and Emgesa. Cash flow from investment activities was also affected by other investment disbursements of Ch$ 88.9 billion, which corresponds to a capital reduction of Emgesa in 2010. The aforementioned cash outflow was partially offset by proceeds from dividends classified as investment cash flow of Ch$ 54.2 billion, mainly from Emgesa and Endesa Brasil.
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2009, investment activities generated a negative cash flow of Ch$ 441.5 billion, mostly explained by the additions of fixed and intangible assets of Ch$ 315.9 billion, mainly at Endesa Chile, Endesa Eco and Emgesa. See Item 4. Information of the Company A. History and Development of the Company Investment, Capital Expenditures and Divestitures. Cash flow from investment activities was also affected by other investment disbursements of Ch$ 208.9 billion, which corresponds primarily to the acquisition of an additional 29.4% stake in Edegel by Endesa Chile. The aforementioned cash outflow was partially offset by proceeds from dividends classified as investment cash flow of Ch$ 75.6 billion, mainly from Endesa Brasil.
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2010, the financing activities of the Company totaled a net cash outflow of Ch$ 547.9 billion. Main drivers of this flow are described below.
The aggregated cash inflows were mainly explained by:
· Issuance of local bonds by Emgesa for Ch$ 144.6 billion.
The aggregated cash outflows were mainly explained by:
· Ch$ 211 billion of prepayment in revolving credit facilities.
· Ch$ 303.5 billion in dividend payments.
· Ch$ 118.9 billion in payment of interest expense.
For the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2009, the financing activities of the Company totaled a net cash outflow of Ch$ 800.4 billion. Main drivers of this flow were:
The aggregated cash inflows were mainly explained by:
· Issuance of local bonds by Emgesa for Ch$ 156.7 billion.
The aggregated cash outflows were mainly explained by:
· Ch$ 202.8 billion final bullet payment in connection with principal of Endesa Chiles Yankee Bond due in April 2009.
· Ch$ 83.7 billion payment of a put option in connection with Endesa Chiles Yankee Bond exercised in February 2009.
· Ch$ 321.0 billion in dividend payments.
· Ch$ 114.6 billion in the payment of interest expense.
For a description of liquidity risks resulting from the inability of Endesa Chiles subsidiaries to transfer funds, please see Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Operations in Every Country in Which We Operate We depend in part on payments from our subsidiaries and affiliates to meet our payment obligations.
We coordinate the overall financing strategy of our subsidiaries. Our operating subsidiaries independently develop capital expenditure plans, and the strategy in the case of operating foreign subsidiaries is to independently finance capital expansion programs through internally generated funds or direct financings. In the case of Chilean subsidiaries, they are financed by Endesa Chile through intercompany loans. For information regarding our commitments for capital expenditures, see Item 4. Information on the Company A. History and Development of the Company Investments, Capital Expenditures and Divestitures.
As of December 31, 2010, our international credit ratings were as follows: Baa3 with stable outlook from Moodys Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys) and BBB+ with stable outlook from both Standard & Poors Rating Services (S&P) and Fitch Ratings Ltd. (Fitch). However, on April 25, 2011, Moodys upgraded our international rating and that of Enersis to Baa2 with stable outlook.
In its most recent press release, Moodys stated that the upgrade largely reflects each issuers strong consolidated metrics and our expectation that both companies future financial performance will continue to remain consistent with the Baa rating category despite an expectation for some degradation in near-term financial performance due to lower margin in certain markets.
Moodys also explained that The ratings upgrade also considers Endesa Chiles commercial policy that we believe continues to be sensible in all the markets where it and its subsidiaries operate. Also Moodys also observes that certain indexation clauses embedded in Endesa Chiles power purchase agreements and other risk management initiatives help to enhance cash flow predictability which reduces potential cash flow volatility that often exists in the cyclical power generation business.
Economic and political stability in the countries where we operate, regulatory framework stability, structural changes affecting energy demand, and environmental issues are some of the factors that could influence credit ratings in either direction. The classifications might also be impacted if we face a significant change in our investments in non-Chilean countries, important changes in our financial position, or a significant change in liquidity. A positive change in Argentinas regulatory framework may also positively influence our credit ratings.
Positive changes in ratings may have a direct impact on our financing cost and our ability to access capital markets in better terms. For instance, some of our credit facilities include rating grid pricing.
Endesa Chile has accessed the international equity capital markets, registering an ADR program with the SEC on August 3, 1994. It has also frequently issued bonds in the United States, so-called Yankee Bonds. Since 1996, Endesa Chile and its subsidiary Pehuenche have issued a total of $ 2,370 million in Yankee Bonds.
The following table lists our Yankee Bonds issued outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The weighted average annual interest rate for such bonds is 8.2%, without giving effect to each bonds duration, or put options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Principal Amount |
| ||
Issuer |
|
Term |
|
Maturity |
|
Coupon |
|
Issued |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage) |
|
(in $ million) |
| ||
Endesa Chile |
|
10 years |
|
August 1, 2013 |
|
8.350 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
Endesa Chile |
|
12 years |
|
August 1, 2015 |
|
8.625 |
|
200 |
|
200 |
|
Endesa Chile (1) |
|
30 years |
|
February 1, 2027 |
|
7.875 |
|
230 |
|
206 |
|
Endesa Chile (2) |
|
40 years |
|
February 1, 2037 |
|
7.325 |
|
220 |
|
71 |
|
Endesa Chile (1) |
|
100 years |
|
February 1, 2097 |
|
8.125 |
|
200 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
8.214 |
|
1,250 |
|
917 |
|
(1) |
Endesa Chile repurchased bonds in 2001. |
(2) |
Holders of these Yankee Bonds exercised a put option against Endesa Chile for a total amount of $ 149.2 million on February 1, 2009. The remaining bonds will mature in February 2037. |
In January 2011, our Colombian subsidiary, Emgesa, accessed the international debt capital markets with the issuance of Rule 144A/Reg S Notes in local Colombian currency for the equivalent of $ 400 million, due on January 2021. This is the first offshore private sector issuance in Colombian pesos. The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes will be to finance new projects, such as El Quimbo, to repay existing debt and for other general corporate purposes.
Endesa Chile, as well as our subsidiaries in the countries in which we operate, have access to their domestic capital markets, where we have issued debt instruments including commercial paper and medium- and long-term bonds that are primarily sold to pension funds, life insurance companies and other institutional investors. In the last 15 years, Endesa Chile has accessed the local market with total bond issuances for UF 29.5 million or $ 1,352 million (as of December 31, 2010).
The following table lists our UF-denominated Chilean bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
Aggregate Principal Amount |
| ||||
Issuer |
|
Term |
|
Maturity |
|
adjusted rate) |
|
Issued |
|
Outstanding |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage) |
|
(UF million) |
|
(UF million) |
|
(in $ million) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile Serie F |
|
21 years |
|
August 2022 |
|
6.20 |
% |
1.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
65 |
|
Endesa Chile Serie K |
|
20 years |
|
April 2027 |
|
3.80 |
% |
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
183 |
|
Endesa Chile Serie H |
|
25 years |
|
October 2028 |
|
6.20 |
% |
4.0 |
|
3.8 |
|
174 |
|
Endesa Chile Serie M |
|
21 years |
|
December 2029 |
|
4.75 |
% |
10.0 |
|
10.0 |
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
4.95 |
% |
19.5 |
|
19.2 |
|
880 |
|
For a full description of our local bonds, see Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table lists local bonds issued by our foreign subsidiaries, outstanding as of December 31, 2010. We present aggregate information for each company. The maturity column for each company reflects the issuance with the longest maturity, and the coupon rate corresponds to the weighted average coupon of all issuances for each company:
Issuer |
|
Maturity |
|
Coupon (1) |
|
Aggregate Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $ million) |
|
Edegel |
|
January 2028 |
|
6.50 |
% |
201 |
|
Emgesa |
|
February 2024 |
|
8.75 |
% |
689 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
891 |
|
We frequently participate in the international commercial bank markets governed by the laws of the State of New York through syndicated senior unsecured loans. Between November 2004 and December 2009, we entered into four such facilities and a six-year term loan. These facilities were structured with various banks, for an aggregate amount of $ 850 million. As of December 2010, the amounts outstanding or available for these bank loans are listed below:
Borrower |
|
Type |
|
Maturity |
|
Facility Amount |
|
Amount Drawn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $ million) |
|
(in $ million) |
|
Endesa Chile |
|
syndicated revolving loan |
|
July 26, 2011 |
|
200 |
|
0 |
|
Endesa Chile |
|
syndicated revolving loan |
|
June 16, 2014 |
|
200 |
|
0 |
|
Endesa Chile |
|
syndicated term loan |
|
June 16, 2014 |
|
200 |
|
200 |
|
The credit facilities maturing in 2014 do not contain a condition precedent requirement regarding the non-occurrence of a material adverse effect (or MAE, as defined contractually) prior to a disbursement, allowing the Company the flexibility to draw on such revolving facilities under any circumstances, including situations involving a MAE. The undrawn amount of Endesa Chiles two international revolving credit facilities is $ 400 million as of December 31, 2010.
Endesa Chile also borrows from banks in Chile under fully committed facilities in which a potentially MAE would not be an impediment to this source of liquidity. In December 2010, we signed a 3-year bilateral loan for UF 2.4 million which is undrawn (equivalent to $ 109 million as of December 31, 2010).
As a result of the foregoing, we have access to fully committed undrawn revolving loans, both international and domestic, for up to approximately $ 509 million in the aggregate as of December 31, 2010, without including the available liquidity of our non-Chilean subsidiaries.
We also borrow routinely from uncommitted Chilean bank facilities with approved lines of credit for the equivalent, as of December 31, 2010, of approximately $ 219 million in the aggregate, of which we do not have any amount outstanding. Unlike the previous committed lines not subject to MAE conditions precedent prior to disbursements, this source of funding in the Chilean market is not guaranteed under all circumstances. Our subsidiaries also have access to uncommitted local bank facilities, for a total amount of $ 983 million, of which $ 542 million are undrawn.
Also, Endesa Chile can tap the Chilean commercial paper market under programs that have been registered with the SVS for up to the equivalent of $ 200 million. Finally, our foreign subsidiaries also have access to other type of financing, including governmental facilities, supplier credit and leasing, among others.
Except for the SEC-registered Yankee bonds, which are not subject to financial covenants, our Chilean-risk outstanding debt facilities include such covenants. The types of financial covenants, and their respective limits, vary from one type of debt to another. As of December 31, 2010, the most restrictive financial covenant affecting us was the Adjusted Consolidated Leverage test, corresponding to the revolving loan facility that matures in June 2014. Under such covenant, the maximum additional debt that could be incurred without a breach of covenant is $ 5.1 billion, which would allow the Company to almost double its current financial debt. As of the date of this report, we are in compliance with our financial covenants contained in our debt instruments.
As is customary for certain credit and capital market debt facilities, a significant portion of Endesa Chiles financial indebtedness is subject to cross default provisions. Each of the revolving credit facilities described above, as well as our Yankee Bonds, have cross default provisions with different definitions, criteria, materiality thresholds and applicability as to the subsidiaries that could give rise to a cross default.
The cross default provision for the Endesa Chiles revolving credit facility due in July 2011, governed by the laws of the State of New York, refers to so-called Relevant Subsidiaries, a contractually defined term that refers to our most important subsidiaries. Under such credit facilities, only matured defaults exceeding $ 50 million qualify for a potential cross default when the principal exceeds $ 50 million, or its equivalent in other currencies. There is a mathematical determination to determine the list of Relevant Subsidiaries, which may vary somewhat from year to year. As of December 2010, Endesa Chiles Relevant Subsidiaries with debt to third parties include only Emgesa and Edegel, both rated AAA in the local markets, and Emgesa is rated BBB- in the international market. In the case of a matured default above the materiality threshold, revolving credit facilitys lenders would have the option to accelerate if the lenders representing more than 50% of the aggregate debt of a particular facility then outstanding choose to do so. As of the date of this report, there is no amount outstanding of this facility, and therefore, there is no current exposure to cross default under this credit agreement. Neither
our Chilean bank facilities due in December 2012 nor the international facilities maturing in June 2014 have cross default provisions to debt other than the borrowers own other indebtedness.
After amendments in July 2009 following a successful consent solicitation, our Yankee Bonds cross default provisions may be triggered only by debt of the Endesa Chile or its Chilean subsidiaries. A matured default of either Endesa Chile or one of its Chilean subsidiaries could result in a cross default to our Yankee Bonds if such matured default, on an individual basis, has a principal exceeding $ 30 million, or its equivalent in other currencies. In the case of a matured default above the materiality threshold, Yankee bondholders would have the option to accelerate if either the Trustee or bondholders representing no less than 25% of the aggregate debt of a particular series then outstanding choose to do so. Following the 2009 Yankee amendments which ring-fenced Chile, a payment default or a bankruptcy/insolvency default outside Chile has no contractual effect on our Yankee Bond indentures, no matter how material.
The cross acceleration and bankruptcy/insolvency clauses of three of our four Endesa Chile UF-denominated Chilean bonds were amended in February 2010, after bondholders approval in January 2010. After the amendments, all series of our Chilean bonds ring-fenced to Endesa Chile, and none of its subsidiaries, neither in Chile nor outside Chile, can trigger a cross default to Endesa Chile.
At the time of this report, Endesa Costanera, our Argentine subsidiary, has not paid the installment due March 2011 for $ 20.9 million of its supplier credit with Mitsubishi Corporation (MC) dating back to 1996. This has been a recurring situation ever since the Argentine crisis of 2002. For additional information of the Argentine crisis and its consequence in the electricity industry, please see Item 4. Information on the Company. B. Business Overview. Electricity Industry Regulatory Framework. Argentina. Regulatory Developments: the industry after the Public Emergency Law. However on March 31, 2011, MC temporarily waived the payment due from Endesa Costanera. The waiver also states MCs willingness to discuss a new payment date for the amount past due.
Except for Endesa Costanera, our companies have access to existing credit lines sufficient to satisfy all of their present working capital needs. In 2010, Endesa Costanera had total indebtedness of approximately $ 72 million (including debt with MC of $ 28 million). Endesa Costaneras access to the capital markets has been very limited due to the difficult financial situation still prevailing in Argentina, especially for the utilities sector, and the poor capital markets development due to the shortage of off-shore financing and the pension fund system nationalization. Notwithstanding these unusual circumstances, Endesa Costanera was still able to refinance its debt maturing in 2010.
Payment of dividends and distributions by our subsidiaries and affiliates represent an important source of funds for us. The payment of dividends and distributions by certain subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to legal restrictions, such as legal reserve requirements, and capital and retained earnings criteria, and other contractual restrictions. We have been advised by legal counsel in the various geographical locations where our subsidiaries and affiliates operate that there currently are no additional legal restrictions on the payment to Endesa Chile of dividends or distributions to us in the jurisdictions where such subsidiaries or affiliates are incorporated. Certain credit facilities and investment agreements of our subsidiaries restrict the payment of dividends or distributions in certain special circumstances. For a description of liquidity risks resulting from our company status, please see Item 3. Key Information D. Risk factors We depend in part on payments from our subsidiaries and affiliates to meet our payment obligations.
Our estimated capital expenditures for the 2011-2015 period, expressed in dollars at internally estimated exchange rates, amount to $ 2,429 million, of which $ 2,272 million is considered non-discretionary investments. We include maintenance capital expenditures as non-discretionary. It is important for us to maintain the quality and operation standards required for our facilities, but we do have some flexibility regarding the timing for these investments. We consider the investment in non-conventional renewable energy (NCRE) projects in Chile as non-discretionary. These investments are being made to comply with regulations that call for 5% of the total contracted energy to be based on NCRE. Finally, expansion projects under execution are also non-discretionary. We consider the remaining $ 157 million as discretionary capital expenditures. The latter includes expansion projects which are still under evaluation, in which case we would undertake them only if deemed profitable.
We do not currently anticipate liquidity shortfalls affecting our ability to satisfy the obligations described in this report. We expect to refinance our indebtedness as it becomes due, fund our purchase obligations outlined previously with internally generated cash, and fund capital expenditures with a mixture of internally generated cash and borrowings.
Transactions that most significantly affected Endesa Chiles foreign subsidiaries liquidity in 2010 included:
· Endesa Costanera: refinancing of all 2010 indebtness for approximately $ 72 million. Within this refinancing, we highlight the $ 28 million refinancing due to MC and $ 8.6 million to Credit Suisse.
· El Chocón: syndicated loan for $ 22 million for 3.5 years, which enabled the company to refinance its short-term debt and to increase the debts average life. The company also signed forward contracts for $ 29 million.
· Emgesa: the first placement of commercial paper was carried out for $ 39 million to refinance short-term debt and local bond issuance for $ 309 million with terms between 5 and 15 years.
· Edegel: bond issuance for $ 20 million denominated in both dollar and local currency, used to refinance short term debt. Edegel also obtained a 7-year term bank loan for $ 61 million, to refinance debt maturing in 2012. The company also signed forward contracts for $ 39 million.
Transactions that most significantly affected Endesa Chiles foreign subsidiaries liquidity in 2009 included:
· Endesa Costanera: refinancing of all debt maturing in 2009 for approximately $ 76 million. Also, Endesa Costanera refinanced $ 4.3 million with Credit Suisse due in 2010, extending its maturity to 2011.
· El Chocón: syndicated loan for $ 31 million for 3 years, which enabled the company to refinance its short-term debt. It also arranged a 2.5-year interest rate swap for $ 30 million.
· Emgesa: local bonds for $ 309 million, the proceeds of which were used to refinance short-term debt.
· Edegel: local bonds for $ 34 million denominated in both dollar and local currency, used to refinance short term debt. Edegel also renegotiated bank loans for $ 42 million, which enabled it to reduce the interest rate and extend the term.
C. Research and Developments, Patents and Licenses, etc.
None.
D. Trend Information.
Endesa Chile is a company with electricity generation assets, and with subsidiaries and unconsolidated equity investments engaged primarily in the generation of electricity in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru. Therefore, our businesses are subject to a wide variety of conditions that may result in variability in our earnings and cash flows from year to year. In general, our net income is a result of our operating income from our generation business and other factors such as income from unconsolidated related companies, foreign currency exchange rate effects and tax expense.
Operating income varies in each of the four countries where we operate due to numerous factors, including hydrological conditions, the price of fuel used to generate electricity and the prevailing spot market and regulated prices for electricity. We expect to continue evidencing a reasonably good operating performance over the coming years, given the favorable macroeconomic perspective for most of the countries in which we operate. The economies of these South American nations were less impacted by the latest international financial crisis as compared to developed countries. There are high expectations for the next few years for a strong economic recovery, including a 4% growth in the national economic product, on average, and a correspondingly stable electricity demand growth.
On the other hand, development of new generation facilities in South America has always followed behind demand growth. We anticipate that this tendency will continue in the foreseeable future. Also, due to growing environmental restrictions, transmission line saturation, obstacles for fuel transportation and scarcity of places where to locate plants, these new projects involve higher development costs than in the past. We foresee that average electricity prices will adjust to recognize these increased costs. This situation could increase the value of our assets, especially in the case of hydroelectric power plants, which have lower production costs, and thus benefit from greater profitability in scenarios of increasing prices to end users. Furthermore, an important part of the new installed capacity under development in the four countries in which we operate corresponds to thermal power plants, with coal and natural gas as their principal fuels, and only a few hydroelectric projects are being developed. Thus, we expect this situation will also impact long term spot prices positively. Long term contracts awarded in different international bids to Endesa Chile, through its subsidiaries, have already
incorporated these expected price levels. Currently, we have 21% of our expected annual generation sold under contracts of at least ten years, and 31% in contracts of at least five years.
However, spot prices are subject to great volatility, affecting our forecasted income. In order to address this risk, the Company has implemented commercial policies in order to control relevant variables and provide stability to the profit margins. Our commercial policy seeks to establish a global framework to conduct the energy trading operations, setting responsibilities, guidelines and acceptable risk limits aligned with company objectives. Therefore, our company defines contractual volumes that minimize the risk of supply in adverse hydrological conditions and includes, where necessary with some clients, risk mitigation clauses.
In order to mitigate the risk of increasing fuel costs, Endesa Chile has fuel supply contracts to cover part of the fuel needed by its thermal generation units, which operate with coal, natural gas and diesel or fuel oil. In Chile, through an equity interest in GNL Quintero, we are the only electricity company participating in the LNG terminal at Quintero bay (the only facility of its kind in the SIC market), enhancing our position to manage fuel supply risks, mainly when facing increasing fuel costs scenarios. This becomes particularly relevant given the increasing trend to penalize other technologies that are intensive in fuels such as coal and diesel, which have a stronger environmental impact. As of December 31, 2010, we have not made any transaction with commodities derivate instruments to handle fuel price fluctuations. For further information on this subject, please see Item 11(a) and 11(b). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Commodity Price Risk.
Though our operations in the four countries allow us to somewhat offset and counterbalance variations with respect to these main factors that affect our operating results, in light of the variability of these factors over time and across the countries in which we operate, we cannot claim that we are fully hedged in our portfolio of generation assets in these countries. Furthermore, we cannot ascertain the likelihood or the extent to which past performance will be indicative of future performance with respect to our business. Any significant change with respect to hydrological conditions, fuel price or the electricity price, among other factors, could affect our operating income in the generation business. At the same time, any significant change with respect to economic and population growth, as well as changes in the regulatory regimes in the countries in which we operate, among other factors, could affect our operating income. Variability in our earnings and cash flows can also arise from non-operating factors as well, such as foreign currency exchange rates. For further information regarding 2010 results of the Company compared with those recorded on previous periods, please see Item 5. A. Operating Results - Endesa Chiles Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 and Item 5.A. Operating Results - Endesa Chiles Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Investors should not look at our past performance as indicative of future performance.
We do not expect that our current debt agreements, which impose certain restrictions, could have a negative impact on our capital expenditure plan as described in Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources. We have a large leverage capacity prior to a potential breach of a debt covenant. As of December 31, 2010, Endesa Chile is able to incur up to $ 5.1 billion in incremental debt, beyond current levels of consolidated indebtedness. We believe that Endesa Chile will continue to have similar comfortable levels of further leverage capacity in the foreseeable future.
In connection with funding sources, as of December 31, 2010, the Company has approximately $ 509 million in committed revolving facilities which have not yet been drawn, and additional uncommitted Chilean lines of credit for another $ 219 million in the aggregate. In addition, Endesa Chile has registered with the SVS certain commercial paper programs for up to $ 200 million. These funding sources can be increased in the case of need.
Finally, as explained above, we expect that the Company will continue generating significant amounts of operating cash, which can be used to finance part of the capital expenditure plan. If needed, our shareholders also have the possibility to adjust the dividend payout ratio, subject to some legal restrictions, in order to allocate the cash needed for our investment plan.
E. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements.
Endesa Chile is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.
F. Tabular Disclosures of Contractual Obligations.
The table below sets forth the Companys cash payment obligations as of December 31, 2010:
Payments due by period (in billions of Ch$)
Endesa Chile on a consolidated basis (5)
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
TOTAL |
|
2011 |
|
2012-2013 |
|
2014-2015 |
|
After |
|
Bank debt |
|
308 |
|
69 |
|
113 |
|
104 |
|
22 |
|
Local bonds (1) |
|
799 |
|
76 |
|
37 |
|
97 |
|
589 |
|
Yankee bonds |
|
429 |
|
0 |
|
187 |
|
94 |
|
148 |
|
Other debt (2) |
|
131 |
|
57 |
|
42 |
|
31 |
|
1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
1,035 |
|
133 |
|
219 |
|
139 |
|
544 |
|
Pension and postretirement obligations (3) |
|
31 |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
18 |
|
Contractual operational obligations (4) |
|
1,589 |
|
224 |
|
258 |
|
229 |
|
878 |
|
Financial leases |
|
80 |
|
10 |
|
17 |
|
17 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
4,402 |
|
572 |
|
878 |
|
716 |
|
2,236 |
|
(1) |
Hedging instruments included modifies substantially the principal amount of debt. |
(2) |
Includes Endesa Costaneras debt with Mitsubishi Corporation for Ch$ 67 billion. |
(3) |
All of our pension and postretirement plans are unfunded. Cash flows estimated in the table are based on future undiscounted payments necessary to meet all of our pension and postretirement obligations. |
(4) |
Of the total amount of Ch$ 1,589 billion, 78% corresponds to miscellaneous services, such as GNL regasification, fuel transport and coal handling, another 16% to fuel supply long term contracts and the remaining 7% to tolls and energy purchases. |
(5) |
All figures are in Ch$ of each year. |
G. Safe Harbor.
The information contained in the Items 5.E and 5.F contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking Statements in the Introduction of this report, for safe harbor provisions.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
A. Directors and Senior Management.
We are managed by our Board of Directors, which consists of nine members who are elected for a three-year term at an Ordinary Shareholders Meeting, or OSM. If a vacancy occurs in the interim, the Board of Directors will elect a temporary director to fill the vacancy until the next scheduled ordinary shareholders meeting, at which time the entire Board of Directors will be elected.
Set forth below are the members of our Board of Directors as of December 31, 2010.
Name |
|
Position |
|
Current Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jorge Rosenblut R. |
|
Chairman |
|
2009 |
|
Paolo Bondi |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
2009 |
|
Jaime Bauzá B. (1) |
|
Director |
|
2010 |
|
Francesco Buresti |
|
Director |
|
2008 |
|
José María Calvo-Sotelo I. |
|
Director |
|
2009 |
|
Vittorio Corbo L. (1) |
|
Director |
|
2010 |
|
Jaime Estévez V. |
|
Director |
|
2009 |
|
Luis de Guindos J. |
|
Director |
|
2009 |
|
Felipe Lamarca (1) |
|
Director |
|
2010 |
|
(1) Appointed Board member in April 2010.
Directors
Jorge Rosenblut R.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mr. Rosenblut was appointed Chairman in December 2009. Since 2003, Mr. Rosenblut has been member of the Endesa Spain International Committee, but his involvement with the Group started in 2000, when he became Chairman of Chilectra, a position held until December 2009. Between 2002 and 2005, Mr. Rosenblut was also Chairman of Smartcom PCS , a mobile phone company. Currently, he is also a member of the board of Ripley, a retail store, the think tank Expansiva and a senior advisor in Eulen America Inc. Additionally, he is a member of several educational and business groups, such as the Deans Advisory Leadership Committee at Harvards Kennedy School of Government, Florida International University President Council of 100, and member of the Group of Fifty (G-50) supported by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace based in Washington, D.C. From 1999 to 2005, he was member of the board of AFP Cuprum, a Chilean pension fund. Between 1990 and 1996, he held several senior positions in the Chilean government, becoming Undersecretary of the Presidency and Undersecretary of Telecommunications. From 1985 to 1990, he was Project Officer at the World Bank in Washington, D.C. Mr. Rosenblut holds a degree in industrial civil engineering from Universidad de Chile and a Master in Public Administration from Harvard University.
Paolo Bondi
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mr. Bondi became a Director and Vice Chairman in July 2009. Mr. Bondi was an executive of the Montedison Group, an Italian industrial conglomerate, holding diverse positions in Italy, the U.S. and France. In 2002, he joined the Enel Group as Head of Strategic and Financial Analysis and then as CFO of the International Division, becoming a member of the board of its main subsidiaries. In October 2007, he was appointed as Endesa Spains Deputy CFO and then Vice Chairman of Chilectra. In March 2009, he became CFO and member of the Executive Committee in Endesa Spain. Mr. Bondi holds a degree in business administration from Università Commerciale L. Bocconi di Milano, Italy.
Jaime Bauzá B.
Director and Member of the Directors Committee
Mr. Bauzá became Director in April 2010. Currently he is also Director of other companies unrelated to Endesa Chile, such as Telmex Chile, Laboratorios Andrómaco, H. Briones, Cementos Bio Bio, Indura and Invesa. Mr. Bauzá was also Director of the Company between 1999 and 2007. From 1990 to May 1999, Mr. Bauzá served as Endesa Chiles CEO. He joined Endesa Chile in May 1990 after more than twenty years working in the electricity sector. Mr. Bauzá was formerly the CEO of Endesa Chiles subsidiary, Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. from 1987 to April 1990 and Chairman of Gener S.A. (formerly Chilgener S.A.), an unrelated electricity generation company. Mr. Bauzá also served as Gener S.A.s CEO from 1981 to 1987. He holds a degree in civil engineering from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Francesco Buresti
Director of the Board
Mr. Buresti became a Director in April 2008. Mr. Buresti was consultant for Accenture in the industrial sector, and consultant for McKinsey in the industrial and utilities sectors. In 2005, Mr. Buresti joined Enel as Networks & Market Purchasing Director. In October 2007, Mr. Buresti was appointed Chief Purchasing Officer and member of the Executive Committee of Endesa Spain. Mr. Buresti holds a degree in electronics engineering from the Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.
José María Calvo-Sotelo I.
Director of the Board
Mr. Calvo-Sotelo joined Endesa Spain in 1997 as head of planning and finance of the Diversification business unit, which encompassed Endesa Spains businesses in wind and renewable energies, gas distribution and telecommunications. In 2001, he was appointed general manager of Endesa Telecomunicaciones, the business unit responsible for Endesa Spains fixed and mobile telecommunication companies in Spain and Chile. Between 2006 and 2010, Mr. Calvo-Sotelo was senior VP of planning, corporate development and regulatory affairs in Endesa Latinoamérica. Before joining Endesa Spain, Mr. Calvo-Sotelo worked for PepsiCo in the United States and Spain. Mr. Calvo-Sotelo holds a Master of Science in physical sciences from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (1987), and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School (1993).
Vittorio Corbo L.
Director of the Board
Mr. Corbo became a Member of the Board in April 2010. Currently, Mr. Corbo is also Chairman of the Board of ING Seguros de Vida, a Chilean insurance company, and a member of the Board of Directors of Banco Santander-Chile. Mr. Corbo is a member of the Advisory Council of the Chief Economist of the World Bank and of the International Advisory Council at the Center for Social and Economic Research (in Warsaw, Poland). He was President and Chairman of the Board of the Central Bank of Chile between 2003 and 2007. He was chosen World Central Banker of the Year in 2006 by the publication Global Finance. Mr. Corbo is a Senior Research Associate at CEP, a Chilean public policy center. He holds a commercial engineering degree from the Universidad de Chile and a Ph.D. in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.).
Jaime Estévez V.
Director and Member of the Directors Committee
Mr. Estévez became a Director in March 2006. Since May 2010, Mr. Estévez has been Chairman of Cruzados SADP and since March 2007, he has been Director of Banco de Chile. Mr. Estévez was Chilean Minister of Public Works and Minister of Transport and Telecommunications in 2005. He was Chairman of the Board of BancoEstado, the Chilean state-owned bank, between 2000 and 2004, and Director of AFP Provida and AFP Protección, two Chilean pension funds. He was a Congressman from 1990 to 1998 and President of the House of Representatives during 1995 and 1996. Mr. Estévez holds the equivalent of a Bachelors degree in economics from the Universidad de Chile and was awarded the ICU prize for the best student of his class.
Luis de Guindos J.
Director of the Board
Mr. De Guindos became a Director in July 2009. From 1988 to 1996, he was CEO of AB Asesores. From 1996 to 2004, he worked in the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Spain, where he held several positions including Secretary of State for Economic Affairs and Secretary of the Economic Affairs Commission. He also served as Vice Chairman of the European Union Economic Policy Committee and Head of the Delegation of the Ecofin Council during the Spanish presidency of the EU, among other special appointments. Between 2006 and 2008, he was CEO of Lehman Brothers for Spain and Portugal. Also, during 2008, he was CEO of Nomura Securities in Spain. In 2009 he worked as Senior Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), responsible for financial services. Currently, he is Director of the Center for Finance for PwC and IE Business School and he also serves on the board of Endesa Spain. Mr. De Guindos holds a BSc in economics from Cunef, Spain and a Ph.D. in economics from Univesidad Complutense de Madrid.
Felipe Lamarca C.
Director and Chairman of the Directors Committee
Mr. Lamarca became a Director in April 2010. Currently Mr. Lamarca is Director of several companies that belong to different industrial sectors, such as Ripley, Deutsche Bank Chile and Fundación Un Techo para Chile. He was Director of the Servicio de Impuestos Internos, the Chilean tax authority. From 1986 to 2005 Mr. Lamarca was Chairman of the Board of COPEC, a Chilean forestry and fuel conglomerate. Between 1997 and 2001, Mr. Lamarca was Chairman of the Board at SOFOFA, Chiles Manufacturers Association. Mr. Lamarca was the Superintendent of the SVS between 1982 and 1983. He is a commercial engineer from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and in 2001 he was awarded the Distinguished Professional of the Year by the Business and Economics School of that university.
Executive Officers
Set forth below are our Executive Officers as of December 31, 2010.
Name |
|
Position |
|
Current Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
Joaquín Galindo V. |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
2009 |
Juan Benabarre B. |
|
Engineering, Projects and Research Development Officer |
|
2010 |
Pietro Corsi M. |
|
Human Resources Officer |
|
2009 |
Eduardo Escaffi J. |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2009 |
Renato Fernández B. |
|
Communications Officer |
|
2003 |
Sebastián Fernández C. |
|
Energy Planning Officer |
|
2008 |
Claudio Iglesis G. |
|
Electricity Production Officer |
|
2010 |
Luis Larumbe A. |
|
Planning & Control Officer |
|
2009 |
Carlos Martín V. |
|
General Counsel |
|
1996 |
José Venegas M. |
|
Trading & Marketing Officer |
|
2001 |
Joaquín Galindo V. became CEO in November 2009. From 1983 to 1996, he held several positions in Sevillana de Electricidad, an Endesa Spain subsidiary, where he was Director of the Thermal Plant of Bahía de Algeciras. In 1998, he became Director of Production of the Systems outside the Iberian Peninsula and Generation Planning for Endesa Generación. Between 2001 and 2004, he was Director of Production and Engineering for Endesa Italia S.p.A. and Counselor of the Centro Sperimentale Elettrotecnico Italiano S.p.A. From 2004 to 2006, he was Counselor-General Director of the Société Nationale d´Électricité et de Thermique S.A, in Paris and Counselor of the Thermal Production Society of Bialystok (Poland). Between 2006 and 2008, he served as Counselor-General Director of Endesa Italia S.p.A. He was also a member of the board of Endesa Europe between 2004 and 2008. Mr. Galindo holds a degree in electrical industrial engineering from Universidad de Sevilla, a degree in economics and business administration and an M.B.A. from Universidad Comercial de Deusto, Spain.
Juan Benabarre B. became Engineering, Projects and Research & Development Officer in November 2010. Mr. Benabarre has held several positions in the Endesa Chile Group since 1979. From 2000 through 2005, he was CEO of Ingendesa, and in the 2005-2010 he was Production & Transmission Officer. Mr. Benabarre is also a member of the board of directors of several companies in the Endesa Spain Group and serves as Endesa Chiles representative at the International Hydropower Association. Mr. Benabarre holds a degree in mechanical civil engineering from Universidad de Chile and completed graduate studies in geothermal energy at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He also holds an M.B.A. from the Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile.
Pietro Corsi M. became Endesa Chiles Human Resources Officer in December 2009. From 1991 to 2001, he held several positions in the Development and Management departments in Human Resources of Endesa Chile, becoming Deputy Development Officer in 2000. Afterwards, he held the position of Development and Management Deputy at Enersis between 2001 and 2003, and then he became deputy of Endesa Chiles Development and Training Department where he worked until November 2009. Mr. Corsi holds a degree in commercial engineering from Universidad Gabriela Mistral, Chile.
Eduardo Escaffi J. became the CFO in October 2009. From 1999 to September 2009, Mr. Escaffi served at the Finance and Risk areas of Endesa Spain, with the position of Risk Officer from 2005 until his most recent position in Endesa Chile. He was the CFO of Enersis from July 1998 to August 1999. Prior to joining the Endesa Group, Mr. Escaffi was the CEO of an Argentine insurance company from 1992 to 1998. He also held the position of Technical and Financial Manager of the life insurance company of the Santander Group in Chile from 1989 to 1992. Before that, in 1989, he served as the Deputy Financial Officer of the Chilean company, Compañía de Teléfonos de Chile. Between 1986 and 1988 he served as adviser to the United Nations Development Program in Venezuela. Mr. Escaffi has also held several positions in Chilean governmental entities such as ODEPLAN and the Ministry of the Interior. Mr. Escaffi is a civil engineer from the Universidad de Chile, with a specialization in structural engineering, and he holds a Senior Executive Programme degree from the London Business School.
Renato Fernández B. has been the External Affairs Officer since August 2003, when he joined Endesa Chile. Prior to that, he was the External Affairs Director of Smartcom PCS from December 2000 to July 2003. From December 1997 to December 2000, Mr. Fernández was the External Affairs Director of Hill & Knowlton Captiva. He holds a degree in journalism from Universidad Gabriela Mistral.
Sebastián Fernández C. became Energy Planning Officer in January 2008. He joined Enersis in January 1997, beginning his professional career in Development. He has served in different positions in the Group, such as Project Manager of Endesa Europe, Deputy Manager of Planning and Investments in Endesa Italy, and Deputy Manager of Generation Projects in Endesa Chile. Mr. Fernández holds a commercial engineering degree from the Universidad de Los Andes, Chile, and attended the YMP program in Insead, in Fontainebleau, France.
Claudio Iglesis G. became Electricity Production Officer in November 2010. He joined Endesa Chile in 1982. He has been CEO of Emgesa and Betania, and Central Buenos Aires, currently part of Endesa Chiles subsidiary Endesa Costanera in Argentina. He also was Endesa Chiles Generation Officer during the 1999-2010 period. Mr. Iglesis was director of CAMMESA and Chairman of the AGEERA in Argentina. He holds a degree in electric civil engineering from the Universidad de Chile.
Luis Larumbe A. holds the position of Planning & Control Officer of Endesa Chile since December 2009. He joined the Endesa Spain Group in 1991, working first in Spain and then in Colombia since 1997 where he held several positions such as Planning & Control Officer in Emgesa and CFO in Codensa. Between 2008 and 2009, he served as CFO of Codensa and Emgesa. Mr. Larumbe holds a degree in Economics and Administration from Universidad Comercial de Deusto, Spain.
Carlos Martín V. became General Counsel in May 1996. He served as the General Counsel of Enersis prior to that, when he joined the Enersis Group in 1989. He holds a law degree from the Universidad Católica de Valparaíso and a Doctor in Law degree from the Universidad de Navarra, Spain.
José Venegas M. has been the Trading & Marketing Officer since June 2001. Mr. Venegas joined the Company in 1992. He was Director of the CDEC-SIC Economic Load Dispatch Center in 1997 and the Commercial Officer from September 1997 to May 2000. He has also served as Planning and Energy Officer from June 2000 to April 2001. Mr. Venegas holds a degree in industrial civil engineering from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and an M.B.A. from Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile.
During 2011 Mr. Pietro Corsi M. left his position. The new Human Resources Officer is Mr. Mauricio Daza E. Please find below a brief biographical description of Mr. Daza.
Mauricio Daza E. became Endesa Chiles Human Resources Officer in March 2011. From 1997 to 2002, he worked in Chilectras Commercial area. Afterwards, between 2003 and 2005, he worked as Commercial Operations Manager in Ampla, Brazil, a distribution subsidiary of Enersis. Then, in 2005 he returned to Chilectra, holding several positions, including Human Resources Officer. Mr. Daza holds a degree in electric civil engineering from the Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile and an M.B.A. from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
B. Compensation.
At the regular shareholders meeting held on April 22, 2010, our shareholders maintained the compensation policy for the Board of Directors approved last year. Each director receives a fixed compensation of UF 55 per month and a fee of UF 36 for attending meetings of the Board. The Vice Chairman will receive a fixed salary of UF 82.5 per month and a fee of UF 54 for attending meetings of the board. The Chairman will receive a fixed stipend of UF 110 per month and a fee of UF 72 for attending meetings of the Board. In 2010, the total compensation paid to each director in pesos, was as follows:
Director |
|
Board |
|
Board |
|
Director |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands of Ch$) |
| ||||||
Jorge Rosenblut R. |
|
44,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
44,957 |
|
Paolo Bondi (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Bauzá B. |
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
20,628 |
|
35,251 |
|
Francesco Buresti (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José María Calvo-Sotelo I. |
|
40,839 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
41,595 |
|
Vitorio Corbo L. |
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,623 |
|
Jaime Estévez V. |
|
23,094 |
|
|
|
24,395 |
|
47,489 |
|
Luis De Guindos J. |
|
25,046 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
25,798 |
|
Gerardo Jofré M.(3) |
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
7,973 |
|
Felipe Lamarca C. |
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
15,463 |
|
28,554 |
|
Borja Prado E. (4) |
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,455 |
|
Leonidas Vial E.(4) |
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
7,626 |
|
Total |
|
194,311 |
|
|
|
65,010 |
|
259,321 |
|
(1) Compensations for Directors Committee.
(2) Mr. Bondi and Mr. Buresti waived compensation for their position as Board Directors of the company.
(3) Mr. Jofré was Board Director until February, 2010.
(4) Mr. Prado and Mr. Vial were Board Directors until April 22, 2010.
We do not disclose, to our shareholders or otherwise, information on individual executive officers compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the aggregate compensation (including performance-based bonuses) of our executive officers, either paid or accrued, attributable to fiscal year 2010, was Ch$ 2,285 million. Executive officers are eligible for variable compensation under a bonus plan. Endesa Chile provides for its executive officers an annual bonus plan for meeting company-wide objectives and for their individual contribution to the Companys results. The annual bonus plan provides for a range of bonus amounts according to hierarchy. The bonuses eventually paid to executives consist of a certain number of gross monthly salaries.
The amount accrued by the Company in 2010 to provide for pension, retirement or similar benefits to our executive officers totaled Ch$ 342 million. The funds accrued to provide for future severance indemnity to our executive officers amounted to Ch$ 567 million, of which Ch$ 87 million was accrued during 2010. There are no other amounts set aside or accrued to provide for pension, retirement or similar benefits for our executive officers.
All of our executive officers have severance indemnity agreements with the Company in the event of voluntary resignation, mutual agreement among the parties, or death. They do not have a right to severance indemnity if their relationship with the Company is terminated due to willful misconduct, prohibited negotiations, unjustified absences, abandonment of duties, among other causes, as defined in article 160 of the Chilean Labor Code. All of the Companys employees are entitled to legal severance pay if dismissed due to the needs of the Company, as defined in article 161 of the Chilean Labor Code.
C. Board Practices.
The Board of Directors as of December 31, 2010 was elected at the OSM of April 22, 2010, and the term for this Board of Directors will expire in April 2013. For information as to the years in which each director began his service at the board, please see Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management above. The members of the Board of Directors do not have service contracts with Endesa Chile or any of its subsidiaries that provide benefits upon termination of employment.
Corporate Governance
Endesa Chile is managed by its Board of Directors which, in accordance with its bylaws, consists of nine directors who are elected at an OSM. Each director serves for a three-year term and the term of each of the nine directors expires on the same day. The directors can be reelected indefinitely. Staggered terms are not permitted under Chilean law. If a vacancy occurs on the board during the three-year term, the Board of Directors may appoint a temporary director to fill the vacancy. Any vacancy will trigger an election for every seat on the Board of Directors at the next OSM.
Chilean corporate law provides that a companys board of directors is responsible for the management, administration and representation of a company in all matters concerning its corporate purpose, subject to the provisions of the companys bylaws and the stockholders resolutions. In addition to the bylaws, Endesa Chiles Board of Directors has adopted regulations and policies that guide our corporate governance principles.
The Charter Governing Executives, approved by our Board in July 2003, and the Employee Code of Conduct, explain our principles and ethical values, establish the rules governing our contact with customers and suppliers, and establish the principles that should be followed by employees, including ethical conduct, professionalism and confidentiality. They also impose limitations on the activities that our executives and other employees may undertake outside the scope of their employment with us.
In order to ensure compliance with Securities Market Law 18,045 and SVS regulations, our Board of Directors at its meeting held on May 29, 2008, approved the Manual for the Management of Information of Interest to the Market, (Manual). This document addresses applicable standards regarding the information of transactions of the Companys securities or those of its affiliates by directors, management, principal executives, employees and other related parties; existence of blackout periods for such transactions by directors, principal executives and other related parties; existence of mechanisms for the continuous disclosure of information that is of interest to the market; and mechanisms that provide protection for confidential information. The Manual was released to the market on May 29, 2008 and posted on the companys website at www.endesa.cl. In February 2010, the Manual was modified in order to comply with the provisions of Law No. 20,382 (Corporate Governance Improvement Law).
The provisions of this Manual shall be applied to the members of our Board, as well as Endesa Chiles executives and employees who have access to privileged information, and especially those who work in areas related to the securities markets.
In order to supplement the aforementioned corporate governance regulations, the companys board, at its meeting held on June 24, 2010 approved an Ethics Code and a Zero Tolerance Anti-Corruption Plan (ZTAC Plan). The Code of Ethics is structured on the basis of general principles such as impartiality, honesty, integrity and others of similar importance, which are implied in the behavior criteria detailed in the document. The ZTAC Plan is the application of the same Code with special emphasis on avoiding corruption in the form of bribes, preferential treatment and other similar matters.
Given that the provisions of the Manual were already included in the Internal Regulations on Conduct in the Securities Markets, approved by our Board on January 31, 2002 (mentioned in previous 20-Fs), the Board revoked this latter document in June 2010.
At its meeting held on March 31, 2011, Endesa Chiles Board approved the Prevention Model required by Law 20,393 of December 2, 2009, which imposes criminal responsibility on legal entities for the crimes of asset laundering, financing of terrorism and bribing of Chilean or foreign public officials. The law encourages companies to adopt this model, whose implementation involves compliance with duties of direction and supervision. The adoption of this model therefore reduces, and in some cases relieves, the effects of criminal responsibility even when a crime is committed. One of the elements of this model is the Prevention Officer which was appointed by the Board at its meeting held on October 27, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the Prevention Officer was Alba Marina Urrea, Auditing Officer of Enersis, our controller.
On October 27, 2010, the board approved GUIDELINES 231 Guidelines applicable to non-Italian subsidiaries in accordance with Legislative Decree 231 of June 8, 2001. Application to Endesa and its Group. Given that Endesa Chiles parent company, Enel S.p.A., has to comply with Legislative Decree 231, which establishes management responsibility for Italian companies as a consequence of certain crimes committed in Italy or abroad, in the name of or for the benefit of such entities, including those crimes contemplated in Chilean Law 20,393, this document, approved by the Board, sets a group of measures, with standards of behavior expected from all employees, advisers, auditors, officials, directors as well as consultants, contractors, commercial partners, agents and suppliers. Decree 231 includes various activities of a preventive nature that are coherent with and integral to the requirements and compliance with Chilean Law 20,393, which deals with the criminal responsibility of legal entities. All of the above is supplementary to the behavioral regulations included in the Code of Ethics and ZTAC Plan.
Compliance with NYSE Listing Standards on Corporate Governance
The following is a summary of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those applicable to domestic issuers under the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Independence and Functions of the Audit Committee
Under the NYSE corporate governance rules, all members of the Audit Committee must be independent. We have been subject to this requirement since July 31, 2005.
On April 22, 2010, at an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting or ESM, the Companys bylaws were amended and the Audit Committee was merged with the Directors Committee. According to the Companys bylaws all of the members of this Committee must satisfy the requirements of independence, as stipulated by the NYSE. Also, Chilean Law requires that the majority of the Directors Committee (at least two out of three members) be independent directors. According to Chilean Law a member would not be considered independent if, at any time, within the last 18 months he or she: (i) maintained any relationship of a relevant nature and amount with the company, with other companies of the same group, with its controlling shareholder or with the principal officers of any of them or has been a director, manager, administrator or officer of any of them; (ii) maintained a family relationship with any of the members described in (i) above; (iii) has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of a non-profit organizations that have received contributions from (i) above; (iv) has been a partner or a shareholder that has controlled, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the capital stock or has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of an entity that has provided consulting or legal services for a relevant consideration or external audit services to the persons listed in (i) above; (v) has been a partner or a shareholder that has controlled, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the capital stock or has been a director, manager, administrator or principal officer of the principal competitors, suppliers or clients. In case there are not sufficient independent directors on the Board to serve on the committee, Chilean Law determines that the independent director nominates the rest of the members of the committee among the rest of the Board members that do not meet the Chilean law independence requirements. Chilean Law also requires that all publicly held limited liability stock companies that have a market capitalization of at least UF 1,500,000 (approximately $ 69 million as of December 31, 2010) and at least 12.5% of its voting shares are held by shareholders that individually control or own less than 10% of such shares, must have at least one independent director and a Directors Committee.
Under the NYSE corporate governance rules, the Audit Committee of a U.S. company must perform the functions detailed in, and otherwise comply with the requirements of NYSE Listed Company Manual Rules 303A.06 and 303A.07. Non-U.S. companies have been required to comply with Rule 303A.06 beginning July 31, 2005 but are not required to comply with Rule 303A.07. Since July 31, 2005, we have complied with the independence and the functional requirements of Rule 303A.06. As required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the NYSE corporate governance rules, on June 29, 2005, Endesa Chiles Board of Directors created an Audit Committee, composed of three directors who were also members of the Board. As previously mentioned, this Audit Committee was merged into the Directors Committee in April 2010. As required by the companys bylaws, the members of Directors Committee -composed of three members of the Board should comply with Chilean law, as well as with the criteria and requirements of independence prescribed by the SOX, SEC and NYSE. As of December 31, 2010, our Directors Committee was composed of three independent directors, all of whom met both the independence criteria of Chilean law and NYSE.
Our Directors Committee performs the following functions:
· examination of Financial Statements and the Reports of the external auditors, prior to their submission to shareholders approval;
· formulation of the proposal to the Board of Directors for the selection of external auditors and private rating agencies;
· examination of information related to operations by the Company with related parties and/or related to operations in which the Companys board members or relevant executive officers, their spouses or relatives, and/or legal entities in which board members or relevant executive officers have worked in the last 18 month, either directly or indirectly;
· examination of the compensation framework and plans for managers, executive officers and employees;
· preparation of an Annual Management Report, including its main recommendations to shareholders;
· information to the Board of Directors about the convenience of recruiting External Auditors to provide non-auditing services, when such services are not prohibited by law, depending on whether such services might affect the external auditors independence;
· oversight of the work of external auditors;
· review and approval of the annual auditing plan by the external auditors;
· evaluation of the qualifications, independence and quality of the auditing services;
· elaboration of policies regarding employment of former members of the external auditing firm;
· review and discussion of problems or disagreements between management and external auditors regarding the auditing process;
· establishment of procedures for receiving and dealing with complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters;
· any other function mandated to the committee by the bylaws, the Board of Directors or the Shareholder of the Company.
As of December 31 2010, Messrs. Jaime Bauzá, Jaime Estévez and Felipe Lamarca (Chairman) were members of this committee, all of whom satisfied the requirements of independence of the NYSE.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The NYSEs corporate governance rules require U.S.-listed companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Although Chilean law does not contemplate this practice (except for the Manual), the Company has adopted the codes of conduct described above, and at its ESM held in March 2006, approved the inclusion of articles in its bylaws that govern the creation, composition, attributions, functions and compensation of the Directors Committee and the Audit Committee.
In order to comply with the new requirements of Law 20,382, which amended the Chilean Companies Act, at the ESM of April 22, 2010, the shareholders of the Company approved amendments to the Companys bylaws, including amendments providing for the merger of the Directors and Audit Committees. The new Directors Committee is composed of three members that comply with the independence requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the NYSE corporate governance rules. The members of this merged committee are Messrs. Jaime Bauzá, Jaime Estévez and Felipe Lamarca. Such committee includes among its functions the duties previously performed by the Audit Committee.
D. Employees.
The following table provides the total number of full time employees of our Companies for the last three fiscal years:
Company |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
In Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
274 |
|
281 |
|
354 |
|
El Chocón |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
50 |
|
Total full time personnel in Argentina |
|
325 |
|
332 |
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile |
|
554 |
|
595 |
|
599 |
|
Pehuenche |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Celta |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Ingendesa (1) |
|
418 |
|
417 |
|
400 |
|
Túnel El Melón |
|
24 |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
GasAtacama (2) |
|
92 |
|
96 |
|
94 |
|
Hidroaysén (2) |
|
26 |
|
29 |
|
24 |
|
Consorcio Ara-Ingendesa (2) |
|
5 |
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
Total full time personnel in Chile |
|
1,123 |
|
1,172 |
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emgesa |
|
404 |
|
415 |
|
430 |
|
Total full time personnel in Colombia |
|
404 |
|
415 |
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Peru |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edegel |
|
219 |
|
224 |
|
228 |
|
Total personnel in Peru |
|
219 |
|
224 |
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total full time personnel of Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries |
|
2,071 |
|
2,143 |
|
2,213 |
|
(1) The Ingendesa figure includes employees of Ingendesas subsidiary in Brazil.
(2) According to IFRS, in 2009 we include the companies consolidated by the proportional integration method.
The following table provides the total number of temporary employees of our companies for the last three fiscal years:
Company |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Avergage |
|
In Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
14.5 |
|
El Chocón |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporary personnel in Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
1.9 |
|
Pehuenche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pangue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Isidro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingendesa (1) |
|
301 |
|
170 |
|
103 |
|
119.0 |
|
Túnel El Melón |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasatacama (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidroaysén (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consorcio Ara-Ingendesa (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporary personnel in Chile |
|
307 |
|
173 |
|
107 |
|
120.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emgesa |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1.5 |
|
Betania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporary personnel in Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Peru |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edegel |
|
23 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
10.8 |
|
Total temporary personnel in Peru |
|
23 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporary personnel in Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries |
|
330 |
|
188 |
|
159 |
|
147.8 |
|
(1) Ingendesa figure includes employees of Ingendesas subsidiary in Brazil.
(2) According to IFRS in 2009 we include the companies consolidated by the proportional integration method.
All Chilean employees who are dismissed for reasons other than misconduct are entitled by law to a severance payment. According to Chilean law, permanent employees are entitled to a basic payment of one-months salary for each year (or a six-month portion thereof) worked, subject to a limit of a total payment of no more than 11 months pay for employees hired after August 14, 1981. Severance payments to employees hired prior to that date consist of one-months salary for each full year worked, not subject to any limitation on the total amount payable. The Company voluntarily makes severance payments above the limits established by Chilean law. In addition, under Endesa Chiles collective bargaining agreements, Endesa Chile is obligated to make severance payments to all covered employees in cases of voluntary resignation or death in specified amounts that increase according to seniority.
In December 2007, Ingendesa signed a new collective contract with its three trade unions for a four-year term. During 2008, Endesa Chile signed three collective contracts, covering technicians and administrative staff. Two of the collective contracts have a three-year term and the third one has a four-year term. In 2009, a four-year collective contract for Edegels personnel was signed in Peru. In 2010, Emgesa negotiated a collective contract, but no agreement was reached; we estimate that during 2011 this collective contract should be signed. Additionally, in 2010 Endesa Chile signed two collective contracts, for engineers and other professionals, both for four-year terms. Management believes Endesa Chiles relationship with its trade unions is positive.
E. Share Ownership.
To the best of Managements knowledge, none of Endesa Chiles directors or officers own more than 0.1% of the shares of the Company. None of Endesa Chiles directors or officers has any stock options, which are not permitted under Chilean securities laws and regulations. It is not possible to confirm whether any of our directors or officers has a beneficial, rather
than direct, interest in the shares of Endesa Chile. To the best of our knowledge, any share ownership by all of the directors and officers of Endesa Chile, in the aggregate, amount to significantly less than 10% of outstanding shares.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
A. Major Shareholders.
Endesa Chile has only one class of capital stock and our major shareholder, Enersis, has no different voting rights than Endesa Chiles other shareholders. As of March 31, 2011 Endesa Chile had 18,468 registered shareholders who held 8,201,754,580 outstanding shares. There are five official record holders in the United States of America, as of such date. It is not practicable for us to determine the number of ADS or common shares beneficially owned in the United States, as we are not able to ascertain the domicile of the final beneficial holders represented by the five official ADR record holders in the United States of America. Likewise, we cannot readily determine the domicile of any of our foreign stockholders who hold our common stock, either directly or indirectly.
As of March 31, 2011, Enersis owns 59.98% of the shares of Endesa Chile. Chilean private pension funds, Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones, or AFPs, own 15.04% in the aggregate. Chilean stockbrokers, mutual funds, insurance companies, foreign equity funds, and other Chilean institutional investors collectively own 16.89% of our equity. ADR holders own 4.17% of the equity. The remaining 3.92% is held by 17,091 minority shareholders.
The following table sets forth information concerning beneficial ownership of Endesa Chiles shares for equity interest greater than 5% as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
As of March 31, 2011 |
| ||
|
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enersis (1) |
|
4,919,488,794 |
|
59.98 |
% |
(1) As of March 31, 2011, Endesa Spain, directly or indirectly, owned 60.6% of the share capital of Enersis.
Enersis is a company primarily engaged, through its subsidiaries and related companies, in the generation and distribution of electricity in Chile, Argentina, Colombia and Peru, and in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Brazil. Enersis is controlled by Endesa Spain, one of the largest Spanish electricity companies, which owns 60.6% of Enersis outstanding capital stock.
Since June 25, 2009, Enel has been the ultimate controlling shareholder of Endesa Chile by virtue of its 92.1% shareholding in Endesa Spain, which in turn owns 60.6% of Enersis. Enel is a publicly-traded company headquartered in Italy, primarily engaged in the energy sector, with presence in 40 countries over 4 continents, and has around 95,000 MW of net installed capacity. It provides service to more than 61 million clients through its electricity and gas businesses.
B. Related Party Transactions.
Article 146 of the Law 18,046 (the Chilean Companies Act) defines related-party transactions as all operations involving the company and any entity belonging to the corporate group, its parent companies, controlling companies, subsidiaries or related companies, board members, managers, administrators, senior officers or company liquidators, including their spouses, some of their relatives and all entities controlled by them, in addition to individuals who may appoint at least one member of the companys directors or who control 10% or more of voting capital, or companies in which a board member, manager, administrator, senior officer or company liquidator have been serving in the same position within the last 18 months. The law establishes that in the event that these persons fulfill the requirements established by Article 146, such persons must immediately inform the Board of Directors of their related-party nature, or such other group as the Board may appoint for that purpose. As required by law, related-party transactions must comply with corporate interests, as well as prices, terms and conditions prevailing in the market at the time of their approval. They must also meet all legal requirements, including board acknowledgement and approval of the transaction (excluding the affected directors), approval by the ESM (in some cases, with requisite majority approval) and be approved pursuant to regulatory procedures.
The aforementioned law, which also applies to Endesa Chile affiliates, also provides for some exceptions, stating that in certain cases, Board approval would suffice for related-party transactions, pursuant to certain related-party transaction thresholds and when such transactions are conducted in compliance with the related-party policies defined by the companys board. At its meetings held on December 17, 2009 and April 23, 2010, Endesa Chiles Board of Directors approved a related-party policy (política de habitualidad) effective as of January 1, 2010. This policy is available on the companys website.
If an operation is not in compliance with Article 146, this would not affect the operations validity, but the company or shareholders may demand compensation from the individual associated with the infringement as provided under law, and reparation for damages.
Our largest electricity distribution customer is Chilectra, a subsidiary of Enersis. The terms of our contracts with Chilectra are regulated in accordance with the Chilean Electricity Law. For additional information concerning the Companys transactions with affiliates and other related parties, see Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have complied with the requirements of Article 146 in all transactions with related parties.
It is common practice to transfer surplus funds from one company to another affiliate that has a cash deficit. It is the Endesa Groups policy that all cash inflows and outflows of Endesa Chile and Endesa Chiles Chilean subsidiaries are managed through a centralized cash management policy in coordination with Enersis. These operations are carried out through either short-term or structured intercompany loans. Under Chilean laws and regulations, such transactions must be carried out on an arms length basis. Our centralized cash management is efficient for both financial and tax reasons. All of these operations are subject to the supervision of our Directors Committee. As of December 2010, these operations are priced at TIP (Chilean variable interest rate) + 0.05% per month.
In other countries in which we do business, these intercompany transactions are permitted, but they have adverse tax consequences. Accordingly, we do not manage the cash flows of our non-Chilean subsidiaries.
Endesa Chile has also made structured loans to its related parties in Chile, primarily to finance projects and to refinance existing indebtedness. As of December 31, 2010, the outstanding net balance for such loans was $ 272 million. The largest amount outstanding during 2010 and 2009 was $ 435 million and $ 313 million respectively. Endesa Chile has only one outstanding loan granted to a foreign subsidiary, Endesa Costanera. The outstanding net balance on this loan amounted to $ 7.1 million as of December 31, 2010. The largest net amount outstanding during 2010 and 2009 for such loan was $ 7.1 million.
The interest rates on these intercompany loans to Endesa Chiles Chilean related parties range from LIBOR plus 0.75% to LIBOR plus 6.72%, with a weighted average interest rate of approximately LIBOR plus 5.2%. The interest rate on the intercompany loan to Endesa Chiles foreign subsidiary was LIBOR plus 5.5% as of December 2010.
As of the date of this report, the aforementioned transactions have not experienced material changes. For more information regarding transactions with related parties, refer to Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel.
Not applicable.
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
See Item 18 for our consolidated financial statements.
Legal Proceedings
We and our subsidiaries are parties to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management considers that it is unlikely that any loss associated with pending lawsuits will significantly affect the normal development of our business.
For detailed information as of December 31, 2010 on the status of the material pending lawsuits that have been filed against the Company or its subsidiaries, please refer to Note 20.2 of our consolidated financial statements. In 2009, the
Company adopted IFRS, and in relation to the legal proceedings reported in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements the Company decided to use the criteria of disclosing lawsuits above a minimum threshold of $ 15 million of potential impact to Endesa Chile, and, in some cases, qualitative criteria according to the materiality of the impact in the conduct of our business.
The lawsuits status includes a general description, the process status and the estimate of the amount involved in each lawsuit.
Dividend Policy
The Board generally establishes a definitive dividend payable each year, and attributable to the prior year, which cannot be less than the legal minimum of 30% of annual net income before negative goodwill amortization. As agreed at a meeting held on February 28, 2011, the Board of Directors declared at the OSM held on April 26, 2011 the payment of a definitive dividend of Ch$ 32.53 per share for fiscal year 2010, equal to a payout ratio of 50% (based on annual net income before negative goodwill amortization). The provisional dividend of Ch$ 6.43 per share paid on January, 26, 2011 was deducted from the definitive dividend to be paid on May 11, 2011, as agreed by the OSM.
The Board of Directors also approved a dividend policy for fiscal year 2011 according to which a provisional dividend will be paid to stockholders equal to 15% of the net income accumulated through September 30, 2011 and will propose a definitive dividend payout equal to 55% of the annual net income for fiscal year 2011. Actual dividend payments will be subject to net profits obtained in each period, as well as to expectations of future profit levels and other conditions that may exist at the time of such dividend declaration. The fulfillment of the aforementioned dividend policy will depend on actual 2011 net income. The Board of Directors has the prerogative to change the amount and timing of the dividends under the circumstances at the time of the payment.
Currently, there are no restrictions on the ability of Endesa Chile or any of its subsidiaries to pay dividends, other than the customary legal restriction of limiting the amount of dividends to net income and retained earnings and in the event of specific circumstances under the conditions of certain credit agreements, except for the following: Endesa Costanera and El Chocón may not pay dividends unless they comply with certain financial covenants. In general terms companies may not pay dividends in case of default on credit agreements. (See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects B. Liquidity and capital resources for further detail on Endesa Chile debt instruments).
Stockholders set dividend policies at each subsidiary and affiliate. There are currently no material currency controls which prohibit Endesa Chile from repatriating the dividend payments from its non-Chilean principal subsidiaries and affiliates.
The Company pays dividends to shareholders of record as of five business days before the payment date. Holders of ADS on the applicable record dates will be entitled to participate in all future dividends.
Dividends
The table below sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the per share amounts of dividends distributed by the Company in pesos and the amount of dividends distributed per 30 common shares (one ADS represents 30 common shares) in dollars. See Item 10. Additional Information D. Exchange Controls.
|
|
Dividends Distributed (1) |
| ||
Year |
|
Nominal Ch$ per |
|
$ per ADS (2) |
|
2006 |
|
8.39 |
|
0.47 |
|
2007 |
|
13.03 |
|
0.79 |
|
2008 |
|
16.92 |
|
0.80 |
|
2009 |
|
25.25 |
|
1.49 |
|
2010 |
|
17.53 |
|
1.12 |
|
(1) This chart details dividends paid in any given year and not the dividends accrued on that year. These dividends may have been accrued the prior year or the same year in which they were paid. These amounts do not reflect reduction for any applicable Chilean withholding tax.
(2) The dollar per ADS amount has been calculated by applying the exchange rate as of December 31 of each year. One ADS represents 30 common shares.
B. Significant Changes
None.
A. Offer and Listing Details.
Market Price and Volume Information
The shares of our common stock currently trade on Chilean, United States and Spanish exchanges. Shares of our common stock have traded in the United States on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) since 1994 in the form of ADS under the ticker symbol EOC. Each ADS represents 30 shares of common stock, with the ADS in turn evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). The ADRs are outstanding under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of September 30, 2010, among Endesa Chile, Citibank N.A. as Depositary, and the holders from time to time of ADRs issued thereunder. Only persons in whose names ADRs are registered on the books of the Depositary are treated by the Depositary as owners of ADRs.
The table below shows, for the periods indicated, high and low closing prices in pesos on the Santiago Stock Exchange and high and low closing prices of the ADS in dollars as reported by the NYSE. As of March 31, 2011, ADRs evidencing 11,405,959 ADS were outstanding (equivalent to 342,178,770 shares or 4.17% of the total number of outstanding shares). It is not practicable for the Company to determine the proportion of ADS beneficially owned by U.S. persons. The ADS closed at $ 56.21 on the last trading day on the NYSE in 2010.
|
|
Santiago Stock |
|
NYSE (1) |
| ||||
|
|
Ch$ per share |
|
$ per ADS |
| ||||
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April |
|
897.00 |
|
838.00 |
|
56.79 |
|
56.28 |
|
March |
|
892.10 |
|
810.00 |
|
55.94 |
|
55.19 |
|
February |
|
840.01 |
|
770.04 |
|
52.77 |
|
48.86 |
|
January |
|
905.00 |
|
827.10 |
|
57.33 |
|
51.14 |
|
lst Quarter |
|
905.00 |
|
770.04 |
|
57.33 |
|
48.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
948.00 |
|
858.00 |
|
58.42 |
|
54.97 |
|
December |
|
948.00 |
|
858.00 |
|
58.42 |
|
54.97 |
|
November |
|
939.00 |
|
866.00 |
|
57.97 |
|
53.26 |
|
1st Quarter |
|
875.00 |
|
813.00 |
|
47.15 |
|
46.46 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
873.00 |
|
795.00 |
|
46.85 |
|
46.10 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
912.00 |
|
862.50 |
|
54.83 |
|
53.82 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
948.00 |
|
858.00 |
|
56.27 |
|
55.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
905.00 |
|
708.00 |
|
51.30 |
|
45.60 |
|
1st Quarter |
|
799.90 |
|
708.00 |
|
39.58 |
|
33.60 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
887.00 |
|
716.00 |
|
50.38 |
|
36.70 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
905.00 |
|
835.00 |
|
51.30 |
|
44.97 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
874.00 |
|
766.00 |
|
51.25 |
|
45.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
865.00 |
|
485.00 |
|
52.50 |
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
886.00 |
|
615.00 |
|
47.80 |
|
37.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
656.70 |
|
450.00 |
|
32.77 |
|
27.31 |
|
(1) Sources: Santiago Stock Exchange, Official Quotation Bulletin, NYSE.
(2) Nominal price in pesos per share at trade date.
B. Plan of Distribution.
Not applicable.
C. Markets.
In Chile, the Companys stock is traded on three stock exchanges. The largest exchange in the country, the Santiago Stock Exchange, was established in 1893 as a private company. Its equity consists of 48 shares held by 45 stockholders as of the date of this report. As of December 31, 2010, 227 companies had shares listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange. For the year ended 2010, the Santiago Stock Exchange accounted for 87.2% of Endesa Chiles total equity traded in Chile. In addition, approximately 11.5% of Endesa Chiles equity trading was conducted on the Electronic Exchange, an electronic trading market that was created by banks and non-member brokerage houses, and 1.3% was traded on the Valparaíso Exchange.
Equities, closed-end funds, fixed-income securities, short-term and money market securities, gold and dollars are traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange. The Santiago Stock Exchange also trades dollar futures and Selective Shares Price Index, or IPSA, futures. Securities are traded primarily through an open voice auction system, a firm offers system or the daily auction. Trading through the open voice system occurs on each business day from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., from April through October, and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. from November though March, Santiago time, which differs from New York City time by up to two hours, depending on the season The Santiago Stock Exchange has an electronic trading system called Telepregón, which operates continuously from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. from April through October, and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. from November through March on each business day. From April through October, auctions may be conducted, three times a day, at 9:15 a.m., 12:30 p.m. and 3:45 p.m. From November through March, the 3:45 p.m. auction is held at 4:45 p.m instead.
There are two share price indexes on the Santiago Stock Exchange: the General Shares Price Index, or IGPA, and the IPSA. The IGPA is calculated using the prices of shares that are traded at least 5% of the trading days of a year and with a total annual transactions exceeding UF 10,000 ($ 458,442 as of December 2010). The IPSA is calculated using the prices of the 40 shares with higher amounts traded, on a quarterly basis, and market capitalization above $ 200 million. The shares included in the IPSA and IGPA are weighted according to the weighted value of the shares traded. Endesa Chile has been included in the IPSA since the beginning of its privatization process in 1987.
In Spain, shares of Endesa Chile were first listed and began trading on the Bolsa de Valores Latinoamericanos de la Bolsa de Madrid, or Latibex, in 2001. One trading unit is the equivalent of 30 common shares and the trading ticker symbol is XEOC. Santander Investment S.A. acts as the liaison entity, and the Banco Santander-Chile as the Depositary in Chile. Trading of our shares on the Latibex during 2010 amounted to 216,950 units, which in turn was the equivalent of 8.1 million. The stock closed at 42.27 on the last 2010 trading day.
D. Selling Shareholders.
Not applicable.
E. Dilution.
Not applicable.
F. Expense of the Issue.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information
A. Share Capital.
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Description of Share Capital
Set forth below is certain information concerning our share capital and a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our bylaws and Chilean law.
General
Shareholders rights in Chilean companies are governed by the companys bylaws (estatutos), which serve the same purpose as the articles or certificate of incorporation and the bylaws of a company incorporated in the United States, and by Law 18,046 (the Chilean Companies Act). In addition, D.L. 3500, or the Pension Funds System Law, which permits the investment by Chilean pension funds in stock of qualified companies, indirectly affects corporate governance and prescribes certain rights of shareholders. In accordance with the Chilean Companies Act, legal actions by shareholders to enforce their rights as shareholders of the Company must be brought in Chile in arbitration proceedings or, at the option of the plaintiff, before Chilean courts. Members of the Board of Directors, managers, officers and principal executives of the Company, or shareholders that individually own shares with book value or stock value higher that UF 5,000 (or $ 229,221) do not have the option to bring the procedure to the courts.
The Chilean securities markets are principally regulated by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, or SVS, under Law 18,045 (the Securities Market Law), and the Chilean Companies Act. These two laws provide for disclosure requirements, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, and protection of minority shareholders. The Securities Market Law sets forth requirements for public offerings, stock exchanges and brokers, and outlines disclosure requirements
for companies that issue publicly offered securities. The Chilean Companies Act, and the Securities Market Law, both as amended, provide rules regarding takeovers, tender offers, transactions with related parties, qualified majorities, share repurchases, directors committee, independent directors, stock options and derivative actions.
Public Register
Endesa Chile is a publicly held stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Chile. Endesa Chile was constituted by public deed issued on December 1, 1943 by the Santiago Notary Public Mr. Luciano Hiriart C. Its existence and bylaws were approved by Decree No. 97 of the Ministry of Finance on January 3, 1944. An excerpt of the bylaws was registered on page 61, and the Decree was registered on page 65 in the Commercial Registrar (Registro de Comercio del Conservador de Bienes Raíces y Comercio de Santiago), on January 17, 1944. Endesa Chile is registered with the SVS and its entry number is 0114. Endesa Chile is also registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reporting Requirements Regarding Acquisition or Sale of Shares
Under Article 12 of the Securities Market Law and General Rule 269 of the SVS, certain information regarding transactions in shares of a publicly held stock corporation or in contracts or securities whose price or results depend on or are conditioned in whole or in part on the price of such shares must be reported to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges. Since American Depositary Shares (ADS) are deemed to represent the shares of common stock underlying the American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), transactions in ADRs will be subject to these reporting requirements and those established in Circular-1375 of the SVS. Shareholders of publicly held stock corporations are required to report to the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges:
· |
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares made by a holder who owns directly or indirectly, at least 10% of a publicly held stock corporations subscribed capital; |
|
|
|
· |
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of contracts or securities whose price or results depend on or are conditioned in whole or in part on the price of shares, made by a holder who owns directly or indirectly, at least 10% of a publicly held stock corporations subscribed capital; |
|
|
|
· |
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares made by a holder who, due to an acquisition of shares of such publicly held stock company, results in the holder acquiring directly or indirectly at least 10% of a publicly held stock companys subscribed capital; and |
|
|
|
· |
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or sale of shares in any amount, made by a director, receiver, principal executive, general manager or manager of a publicly held stock company. |
In addition, majority shareholders of a publicly held stock corporation must inform the SVS and the Chilean stock exchanges if such transactions are entered into with the intention of acquiring control of the Company or if they are making a passive financial investment instead.
Under Article 54 of the Securities Market Law and General Rule 104 enacted by the SVS, any person who directly or indirectly intends to take control of a publicly held stock corporation must disclose this intent to the market at least ten business days in advance of the proposed change of control and, in any event, as soon as the negotiations for the change of control have taken place or reserved information of the publicly held stock corporation has been provided.
Corporate Objectives and Purposes
Article 4 of our bylaws states that our corporate objectives and purposes are, among other things, to exploit the production, transportation, distribution and supply of electric power, as well as to provide engineering consultant services, directly or through other companies, in Chile and abroad.
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors is comprised of nine members who are appointed by shareholders at the OSM of the Company and are elected for a period of three years, at the end of which they will be re-elected or replaced.
The nine directors elected at the OSM are the nine individual nominees who receive the highest majority of the votes. Each shareholder may vote his shares in favor of one nominee or may apportion his shares among any number of nominees.
The effect of these voting provisions is to ensure that a shareholder owning more than 10% of our shares is able to elect a member of the Board.
The compensation of the directors is set annually at the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting. See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees B. Compensation.
Agreements entered into by Endesa Chile with related parties can only be executed when such agreements serve the interest of the Company, and their price, terms and conditions are consistent with prevailing market conditions at the time of their approval and comply with all the requirements and procedures indicated in article 147 of the Chilean Companies Act.
Certain Powers of the Board of Directors
Our bylaws provide that every arrangement or contract that the Company enters into with its controlling shareholder, its directors or Executives, or with their related parties, must be previously approved by two thirds of the Board of Directors and be included in the Board meetings and must comply with the provisions of the Chilean Companies Act.
Our bylaws do not contain provisions relating to:
· the directors power, in the absence of an independent quorum, to vote on compensation for themselves or any members of their body;
· borrowing powers exercisable by the directors and how such borrowing powers can be varied;
· retirement or non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement; or
· number of shares, if any, required for directors qualification.
Certain Provisions Regarding Shareholder Rights
As of the date of the filing of this report, Endesa Chiles capital is comprised of only one class of shares, all of which are ordinary shares and have the same rights.
Our bylaws do not contain any provisions relating to:
· redemption provisions;
· sinking funds; or
· liability for capital calls by the Company.
Under Chilean law, the rights of holders of stock of the Company may only be changed by an amendment to the bylaws that complies with the requirements explained below under Item 10. Additional Information B. Memorandum and Articles of Association Shareholders Meetings and Voting Rights.
Capitalization
Under Chilean law, only the shareholders of a company acting at an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting (ESM) have the power to authorize a capital increase. When an investor subscribes for shares, these are officially issued and registered under his name, and the subscriber is treated as a shareholder for all purposes, except receipt of dividends and for return of capital in the event that the shares have been subscribed but not paid for. The subscriber becomes eligible to receive dividends only for the shares that he has actually paid for, or, if he has paid for only a portion of such shares, the pro rata portion of the dividends declared with respect to such shares unless the companys bylaws provide otherwise. If a subscriber does not fully pay for shares for which he has subscribed on or prior to the date agreed upon for payment, the company is entitled to auction the shares on the stock exchange where such shares are traded and has a cause of action against the subscriber for the difference between the subscription price and the price actually received at auction, if any. However, until such shares are sold at auction, the subscriber continues to possess all the rights of a shareholder, except the right to receive dividends and return of capital. When there are authorized and issued shares for which full payment has not been made within the period fixed by shareholders at the same ESM at which the subscription was authorized (which in no case may exceed three years from the date of such meeting), the Board must proceed to collect payment, unless the shareholders
meeting had authorized (by two thirds of the voting shares) to reduce the companys capital to the amount effectively collected.
As of December 31, 2010, the subscribed and fully paid capital of the Company totaled Ch$ 1,332 billion and consisted of 8,201,754,580 shares.
Preemptive Rights and Increases of Share Capital
The Chilean Companies Act requires Chilean companies to grant shareholders preemptive rights to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage of such company whenever such company issues new shares.
Under Chilean law, preemptive rights are exercisable or freely transferable by shareholders during a 30-day period following the day the capital increase is made public. During such 30-day period, and for an additional 30-day period immediately following the initial 30-day period, publicly held stock corporations are not permitted to offer any unsubscribed shares to third parties on terms which are more favorable than those offered to their shareholders. At the end of the second 30-day period, a Chilean publicly held stock corporation is authorized to sell non-subscribed shares to third parties on any terms, provided they are sold on one of the Chilean stock exchanges.
Shareholders Meetings and Voting Rights
An OSM must be held within the first four months following the end of our fiscal year. The last OSM was held on April 26, 2011. An ESM may be called by the Board of Directors when deemed appropriate, or when requested by shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued shares with voting rights or by the SVS. To convene an OSM, or an ESM, notice must be given three times in a newspaper located in our corporate domicile. The newspaper designated by our shareholders is El Mercurio de Santiago. The first notice must be published not less than 15 days and no more than 20 days in advance of the scheduled meeting. Notice must also be mailed to each shareholder, to the SVS and to the Chilean stock exchanges.
Under Chilean law, a quorum for a shareholders meeting is established by the presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders representing at least a majority of the issued shares with voting rights of a company. If a quorum is not present at the first meeting, a reconvened meeting can take place at which the shareholders present are deemed to constitute a quorum regardless of the percentage of the shares represented. The second meeting must take place within 45 days following the scheduled date for the first meeting. Shareholders meetings adopt resolutions by the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present or represented at the meeting. An ESM must be called to take the following actions:
· a transformation of the company into a form other than a publicly held stock corporation under the Chilean Companies Act, a merger or split-up of the company;
· an amendment to the term of duration or early dissolution of the company;
· a change in the corporations domicile;
· a decrease of corporate capital;
· an approval of capital contributions in kind and non-monetary assessments;
· a modification of the authority reserved to shareholders or limitations on the board of directors;
· a reduction in the number of members of the board of directors;
· a disposition of 50% or more of the assets of the corporation, whether it includes disposition of liabilities or not, as well as the approval or the amendment of the business plan which contemplates the disposition of assets in an amount greater that such percentage;
· the disposition of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, as long as such subsidiary represents at least 20% of the assets of the corporation, as well as any disposition of its shares that results in the parent company losing its position as controller;
· the form of distributing corporate benefits;
· issue of guarantees for third-party liabilities which exceed 50% of the assets, except when the third party is a subsidiary of the company, in which case approval of the board of directors is deemed sufficient;
· the purchase of the corporations own shares;
· others established by the bylaws or the laws;
· certain remedies for the nullification of the corporate bylaws;.
· inclusion in the bylaws of the right to purchase shares to minority shareholders, when the controlling shareholders reaches 95% of the companys shares by means of a tender offer for all of the companys shares, where at least 15% of the shares have been acquired from unrelated shareholders;
· approval or ratification of acts or contracts with related parties.
Regardless of the quorum present, the vote required for any of the actions above is at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares with voting rights.
Bylaw amendments for the creation of a new class of shares, or an amendment to or an elimination of those classes of shares that already exist, must be approved by at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the affected series.
Chilean law does not require a publicly held stock corporation to provide its shareholders the same level and type of information required by the securities laws regarding the solicitation of proxies. However, shareholders are entitled to examine the books of a publicly held stock corporation within the 15-day period before its scheduled OSM. Under Chilean law, a notice of a shareholders meeting listing matters to be addressed at the meeting must be mailed at least 15 days prior to the date of such meeting, and, an indication of the way complete copies of the documents that support the matters submitted for voting can be obtained, which must also be made available to shareholders on the Companys website. In the case of an OSM, the annual report of the Companys, activities which includes audited financial statements, must also be made available to shareholders and published on the Companys website at: www.endesa.cl.
The Chilean Companies Act provides that, upon the request by the Directors Committee or by shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued shares with voting rights, a Chilean companys annual report must include, in addition to the materials provided by the board of directors to shareholders, such shareholders comments and proposals in relation to the companys affairs. Similarly, the Chilean Companies Act provides that whenever the board of directors of a publicly held stock corporation convenes an OSM and solicits proxies for the meeting, or circulates information supporting its decisions or other similar material, it is obligated to include the pertinent comments and proposals that may have been made by the Directors Committee or by shareholders owning 10% or more of the shares with voting rights who request that such comments and proposals be so included.
Only shareholders registered as such with Endesa Chile at least five business days prior to the date of a meeting are entitled to attend and vote their shares. A shareholder may appoint another individual, who does not need to be a shareholder, as his proxy to attend the meeting and vote on his behalf. Proxies for such representation shall be given in writing for all the shares held by the owner. Every shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a shareholders meeting shall have one vote for every share subscribed.
There are no limitations imposed by Chilean law or the companys bylaws on the right of nonresidents or foreigners to hold or vote shares of common stock. However, the registered holder of the shares of common stock represented by ADSs, and evidenced by outstanding ADRs, is the custodian of the Depositary, currently Citibank N.A. (Chile), or any successor thereto. Accordingly, holders of ADRs are not entitled to receive notice of meetings of shareholders directly or to vote the underlying shares of common stock represented by ADS and evidenced by the ADRs directly. The Deposit Agreement contains provisions pursuant to which the Depositary has agreed to solicit instructions from registered holders of ADRs as to the exercise of the voting rights pertaining to the shares of common stock represented by the ADS and evidenced by such ADRs. Subject to compliance with the requirements of the Deposit Agreement and receipt of such instructions, the Depositary has agreed to endeavor, insofar as practicable and permitted under Chilean law and the provisions of the bylaws, to vote or cause to be voted (or grant a discretionary proxy to the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company or to a person designated by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company to vote) the shares of common stock represented by the ADS evidenced by such ADRs in accordance with any such instruction. The Depositary shall not itself
exercise any voting discretion over any shares of common stock underlying ADS. If no voting instructions are received by the Depositary from a holder of ADRs with respect to the shares of common stock represented by the ADS, and evidenced by such ADRs, on or before the date established by the Depositary for such purpose, the shares of common stock represented by the ADS, may be voted in the manner directed by the Chairman of the Board of the company, subject to limitations set forth in the Deposit Agreement.
Dividends and Liquidation Rights
According to the Chilean Companies Act, unless otherwise decided by unanimous vote of its issued shares eligible to vote, all companies must distribute a cash dividend in an amount equal to at least 30% of their consolidated net income, before amortization and negative goodwill for each year (calculated according to the local accounting rules applicable to the company when preparing financial statements to be submitted to the SVS), unless and except to the extent the company has carried forward losses. The law provides that the Board of Directors must propose the dividend policy to the shareholders at the OSM.
Any dividend in excess of 30% of net income may be paid, at the election of the shareholder, in cash, in Endesa Chiles shares or in shares of publicly held corporations held by Endesa Chile. Shareholders who do not expressly elect to receive a dividend other than in cash are legally presumed to have decided to receive the dividend in cash.
Dividends which are declared but not paid within the appropriate time period set forth in the Chilean Companies Act (as to minimum dividends, 30 days after declaration; as to additional dividends, the date set for payment at the time of declaration) are adjusted to reflect the change in the value of UF, from the date set for payment to the date such dividends are actually paid. Such dividends also accrue interest at the then-prevailing rate for UF-denominated deposits during such period. The right to receive a dividend lapses if it is not claimed within five years from the date such dividend is payable. Payments not collected in such period are transferred for the benefit of the Fire Department, formed by volunteers.
In the event of a liquidation of Endesa Chile, the holders of shares would participate in the assets available in proportion to the number of paid-in shares held by them, after payment to all creditors.
Approval of Financial Statements
The Board of Directors is required to submit Endesa Chiles consolidated financial statements to the shareholders annually for their approval. If the shareholders by a vote of a majority of shares present (in person or by proxy) at the shareholders meeting reject the financial statements, the Board of Directors must submit new financial statements no later than 60 days from the date of such meeting. If the shareholders reject the new financial statements, the entire Board of Directors is deemed removed from office and a new board is elected at the same meeting. Directors who individually approved such financial statements are disqualified for reelection for the following period. Our shareholders have never rejected the financial statements presented by the Board of Directors.
Change of Control
The Capital Markets Law establishes a comprehensive regulation related to tender offers. The law defines a tender offer as the offer to purchase shares of companies which publicly offer their shares or securities convertibles into shares and which offer is made to shareholders to purchase their shares under conditions which allow the bidder to reach a certain percentage of ownership of the company within a fixed period of time. These provisions apply to both voluntary and hostile tender offers.
Acquisition of Shares
There are no provisions in our bylaws that discriminate against any existing or prospective holder of shares as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares. However, no person may directly or indirectly own more than 65% of the outstanding shares of our stock. The foregoing restriction does not apply to the depositary as record owner of shares represented by ADRs, but it does apply to each beneficial ADS holder. Additionally, our bylaws prohibit any shareholder from exercising voting power with respect to more than 65% of the common stock owned by such shareholder or on behalf of others representing more than 65% of the outstanding issued shares with voting rights.
Right of Dissenting Shareholders to Tender Their Shares
The Chilean Companies Act provides that upon the adoption of any of the resolutions enumerated below at a meeting of shareholders, dissenting shareholders acquire the right to withdraw from the company and to compel the company to repurchase their shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain terms and conditions. In order to exercise such withdrawal rights, holders of ADRs must first withdraw the shares represented by their ADRs pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement.
Dissenting shareholders are defined as those who at a shareholders meeting vote against a resolution that results in the withdrawal right, or who if absent from such meeting, state in writing their opposition to the respective resolution, within the 30 days following the shareholders meeting. The price paid to a dissenting shareholder of a publicly held stock corporation whose shares are quoted and actively traded on one of the Chilean stock exchanges, is the greater of (i) the weighted average of the sales prices for the shares as reported on the Chilean stock exchanges on which the shares are quoted for the two-month period preceding the shareholders meeting giving rise to the withdrawal right, and (ii) the market price resulting from the average price of transactions on such day. If, because of the volume, frequency, number and diversity of the buyers and sellers, the SVS determines that the shares are not actively traded on a stock exchange, the price paid to the dissenting shareholder shall be the book value. Book value for this purpose shall equal paid capital plus reserves and profits, less losses, divided by the total number of subscribed shares, whether entirely or partially paid. For the purpose of making this calculation, the last consolidated statements of financial position is used, as adjusted to reflect inflation up to the date of the shareholders meeting which gave rise to the withdrawal right.
The resolutions that result in a shareholders right to withdraw include, among others, the following:
· the transformation of the company into an entity which is not a publicly held stock corporation governed by Chilean Companies Act;
· the merger of the company with another company;
· disposition of 50% or more of the assets of the corporation, whether it includes disposition of liabilities or not, as well as the approval or the amendment of the business plan which contemplates the disposition of assets in an amount greater than such percentage;
· the disposition of 50% or more of the assets of a subsidiary, as long as such subsidiary represents at least 20% of the assets of the corporation, as well as any disposition of its shares that results in the parent company losing its position of controller;
· issue of guarantees for third parties liabilities which exceed 50% of the assets (if the third party is a subsidiary of the company, the approval of the board of directors is sufficient);
· the creation of preferential rights for a class of shares or an amendment to the existing ones. In this case the right to withdraw only accrues to the dissenting shareholders of the class or classes of shares adversely affected;
· certain remedies for the nullification of the corporate bylaws; and
· such other causes as may be established by the law or by the companys bylaws.
Investments by AFPs
The Pension Funds System Law permits AFPs to invest their funds in companies that are subject to Title XII and, subject to greater restrictions, in other companies. The determination of which stocks may be purchased by AFPs is made by the Risk Classification Committee. The Risk Classification Committee establishes investment guidelines and is empowered to approve or disapprove those companies that are eligible for AFP investments. Endesa Chile has been a Title XII Company since 1987 and is approved by the Risk Classification Committee.
Title XII companies are required to have bylaws that limit the ownership of any shareholder to a specified maximum percentage, that require that certain actions be taken only at a meeting of the shareholders and bylaws that give the shareholders the right to approve certain investment and financing policies.
Registrations and Transfers
Shares issued by Endesa Chile are registered with an administrative agent named Depósito Central de Valores S.A., Depósito de Valores. This entity is responsible for Endesa Chiles shareholders registry as well. In case of jointly owned shares, an attorney-in-fact must be appointed to represent the joint owners in dealing with Endesa Chile.
C. Material Contracts
None.
D. Exchange Controls
The Central Bank is responsible for, among other things, monetary policies and exchange controls in Chile. Currently applicable foreign exchange regulations are set forth in the Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (the Compendium) approved by the Chilean Central Bank in 2002. Appropriate registration of a foreign investment in Chile permits the investor access to the Formal Exchange Market. Foreign investments can be registered with the Foreign Investment Committee under D.L. 600 of 1974 or can be registered with the Central Bank under the Central Bank Act, Law 18840 of October 1989.
a) Foreign Investments Contracts and Chapter XXVI
Regarding our initial public offering of ADS in 1994, we entered into a foreign investment contract (the Foreign Investment Contract) with the Chilean Central Bank and the Depositary, pursuant to Article 47 of the Central Bank Act and Chapter XXVI of the former Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations (Chapter XXVI), which governed the issuance of ADS by a Chilean company. Pursuant to the Foreign Investment Contract, the foreign exchange for payments and distributions with respect to the ADS may be purchased in either the Formal Exchange Market or the Informal Exchange Market, but such payments must be necessarily remitted through the Formal Exchange Market.
As of April 19, 2001, Chapter XXVI was eliminated and new investments in ADRs by non-residents of Chile, are now governed instead by Chapter XIV of the Compendium. This change was made with the purpose of simplifying and facilitating the flow of capital to and from Chile. As a result of the elimination of Chapter XXVI, access to the Formal Exchange Market is no longer assured. However, because our Foreign Investment Contract was entered into pursuant to Chapter XXVI, the principles of Chapter XXVI still apply to its terms. Foreign investors who have purchased their shares under a Foreign Investment Contract pursuant to Chapter XXVI continue to have access to the Formal Exchange Market for the purpose of converting pesos to dollars and repatriating from Chile amounts received with respect to the deposited shares of common stock or shares of common stock withdrawn from deposit on surrender of ADRs (including amounts received as cash dividends and proceeds from the sale in Chile of the underlying shares of common stock and any rights with respect thereto). However, foreign investors who have not deposited the shares of common stock into our ADS facility will not have the benefits of our Foreign Investment Contract with the Central Bank but instead will be subject to the normal foreign investment rules.
The following is a summary of certain provisions which were contained in Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract, and which therefore remain relevant. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract.
Under Chapter XXVI and the Foreign Investment Contract, the Central Bank agreed to grant to the Depositary, on behalf of ADR holders, and to any investor not residing or domiciled in Chile who withdraws common stock upon delivery of ADRs (such shares of common stock being referred to herein as Withdrawn Shares) access to the Formal Exchange Market to convert pesos into dollars (and to remit such dollars outside of Chile), including amounts received as:
· cash dividends;
· proceeds from the sale in Chile of Withdrawn Shares subject to receipt by the Central Bank of a certificate from the holder of the Withdrawn Shares (or from an institution authorized by the Central Bank) that such holders residence and domicile are outside Chile and a certificate from a Chilean stock exchange (or from a brokerage or securities firm established in Chile) that such Withdrawn Shares were sold on a Chilean stock exchange;
· proceeds from the sale in Chile of rights to subscribe for additional shares of Common Stock;
· proceeds from the liquidation, merger or consolidation of our Company; and
· other distributions, including, without limitation, those resulting from any recapitalization, as a result of holding shares of Common Stock represented by ADS or Withdrawn Shares.
Transferees of Withdrawn Shares were not entitled to any of the foregoing rights under Chapter XXVI. Investors receiving Withdrawn Shares in exchange for ADRs had the right to redeposit such shares in exchange for ADRs, provided that certain conditions relating to redeposit were satisfied.
Chapter XXVI provided that access to the Formal Exchange Market in connection with dividend payments was conditioned upon certification by us to the Central Bank that a dividend payment has been made and any applicable tax has been withheld. Chapter XXVI also provided that the access to the Formal Exchange Market in connection with the sale of Withdrawn Shares or distributions thereon was conditioned upon receipt by the Central Bank of certification by the Depositary (or the Custodian on its behalf) that such shares have been withdrawn in exchange for ADRs and receipt of a waiver of the benefit of the Foreign Investment Contract with respect thereto until such Withdrawn Shares were redeposited.
The Foreign Investment Contract provides that a person who brings foreign currency into Chile to purchase shares of common stock with the benefit of the Foreign Investment Contract must convert it into pesos on the same day and has five banking business days within which to invest in shares of common stock in order to receive the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract. If such person decides within such period not to acquire shares of common stock, such person can access the Formal Exchange Market to reacquire dollars, provided that the applicable request is presented to the Central Bank within seven banking business days of the initial conversion into pesos. Shares acquired as described above may be deposited for ADRs and receive the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract, subject to receipt by the Central Bank of a certificate from the Depositary (or the Custodian on its behalf) that such deposit has been effected, that the related ADRs have been issued and receipt of a declaration from the person making such deposit waiving the benefits of the Foreign Investment Contract with respect to the deposited shares of common stock.
Access to the Formal Exchange Market under any of the circumstances described above is not automatic. Such access requires approval of the Central Bank based on a request presented through a banking institution established in Chile. The Foreign Investment Contract provides that if the Central Bank has not acted on such request within seven banking days, the request will be deemed approved.
Under current Chilean law, the Foreign Investment Contract cannot be changed unilaterally by the Central Bank. It is not certain, however, that additional Chilean restrictions applicable to the holders of ADRs, the disposition of underlying shares of Common Stock or the repatriation of the proceeds from such disposition could not be imposed in the future, nor can there be any assessment of the duration or impact of such restrictions, if imposed.
The Compendium and International Bond Issuances
Chilean issuers may offer bonds issued by the Central Bank internationally under Chapter XIV, as amended, of the Compendium.
E. Taxation.
Chilean Tax Considerations
The following discussion summarizes material Chilean income and withholding tax consequences to beneficial owners arising from the ownership and disposition of the shares and ADS. The summary which follows does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, own or dispose of shares or ADS and does not purport to deal with the tax consequences applicable to all categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules. Holders of shares and ADS are advised to consult their own tax advisors concerning the Chilean and other tax consequences of the ownership of shares or ADS.
The summary that follows is based on Chilean law, as in effect on the date hereof, and is subject to any changes in these or other laws occurring after such date, possibly with retroactive effect. Under Chilean law, provisions contained in statutes such as tax rates applicable to foreign investors, the computation of taxable income for Chilean purposes and the manner in which Chilean taxes are imposed and collected may be amended only by another law. In addition, the Chilean tax authorities enact rulings and regulations of either general or specific application and interpret the provisions of the Chilean Income Tax Law. Chilean tax may not be assessed retroactively against taxpayers who act in good faith relying on such rulings,
regulations and interpretations, but Chilean tax authorities may change their rulings, regulations and interpretations in the future. The discussion that follows is also based, in part, on representations of the Depositary, and assumes that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreements will be performed in accordance with its terms. As of this date, there is currently no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile. However, in 2010 the United States and Chile signed an income tax treaty that will enter into force once the treaty is ratified by both countries. There can be no assurance that the treaty will be ratified by either country. The following summary assumes that there is no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile.
As used in this report, the term foreign holder means either:
· in the case of an individual, a person who is not a resident of Chile; for purposes of Chilean taxation, an individual holder is resident of Chile if he or she has resided in Chile for more than six months in one calendar year, or a total of more than six months in two consecutive fiscal years; or
· in the case of a legal entity, an entity that is not organized under the laws of Chile, unless the shares or ADS are assigned to a branch, agent, representative or permanent establishment of such entity in Chile.
Taxation of Shares and ADS
Taxation of Cash Dividends and Property Distributions
General Rule: Cash dividends paid with respect to the shares or ADS held by a foreign holder will be subject to a 35% Chilean withholding tax, which is withheld and paid by the company. A credit against the Chilean withholding tax is available based on the level of corporate income tax actually paid by the company on the income to be distributed; however, this credit does not reduce the Chilean withholding tax on a one-for-one basis because it also increases in the same amount the base on which the Chilean withholding tax is imposed. In addition, if the company distributes less than all of its distributable income, the credit for the Chilean corporate income tax paid by the company is proportionately reduced. Since January 1, 2004, the Chilean corporate income tax rate is 17% (See below regarding a temporary rate increase for 2011 and 2012). The example below illustrates the effective Chilean withholding tax burden on a cash dividend received by a foreign holder, assuming a Chilean withholding tax rate of 35%, an effective Chilean corporate income tax rate of 17% and a distribution of 50% of the net income of the company distributable after payment of the Chilean corporate income tax:
1 |
|
Company taxable income (based on Line 1 = 100) |
|
100.0 |
|
2 |
|
Chilean corporate income tax : 17% x Line 1 |
|
17.0 |
|
3 |
|
Net distributable income: Line 1 Line 2 |
|
83.0 |
|
4 |
|
Dividend distributed (50% of net distributable income): 50% of Line 3 |
|
41.5 |
|
5 |
|
Withholding tax: (35% of the sum of (Line 4 + 50% of Line 2)) |
|
(17.5 |
) |
6 |
|
Credit for 50% of Chilean corporate income tax : 50% x Line 2 |
|
8.5 |
|
7 |
|
Net withholding tax : Line 5 + Line 6 |
|
(9.0 |
) |
8 |
|
Net dividend received: Line 4 + Line 7 |
|
32.5 |
|
9 |
|
Effective dividend withholding rate : Line 7 / Line 4 |
|
21.69 |
% |
In general, the effective dividend Chilean withholding tax rate, after giving effect to the credit for the Chilean corporate income tax paid by the company, can be computed using the following formula:
Effective Dividend |
|
= |
|
(Withholding tax rate) - (Chilean corporate income tax rate) |
Withholding Tax Rate |
|
|
|
1 - (Chilean corporate income tax rate) |
Using the prevailing rates, the Effective Dividend Withholding Rate = (35%-17%) / (100%-17%) = 21.69%
Dividends are generally assumed to have been paid out of the Companys oldest retained profits for purposes of determining the level of Chilean corporate income tax that was paid by the Company. For information as to the retained earnings of the Company for tax purposes and the tax credit available on the distribution of such retained earnings, see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Under Chilean Income Tax Law, dividend distributions made in property are subject to the same Chilean tax rules as cash dividends. Stock dividends are not subject to Chilean taxation.
The Chilean Income Tax Law was amended in July 2010. Pursuant to the amendments in 2011, the Chilean corporate income tax rate will be increased from 17% to 20%, either on a cash or accrual tax basis. In 2012, the corporate income tax rate will decrease to 18.5%, and in 2013, the rate will once again return to the 17% rate prevailing for 2010. As discussed above, the corporate income tax is a credit against the withholding tax rate applicable on cash dividends received by a foreign holder.
Exceptions: Despite the aforementioned general rule, there are special circumstances under which a different tax treatment would apply depending on the source of the income or due to special circumstances existing at the date of the dividend distribution. The most common special cases are briefly described below:
1) Circumstances where there is no credit against the Chilean withholding tax: Dividends distributed by the company to foreign holders would not receive a credit against the Chilean withholding tax. By way of example, such is the case when dividend distributions exceed the companys taxable income or when the income was not subject to corporate income tax due to an exemption. In these cases, the foreign holder will be subject to the Chilean withholding tax rate of 35%, without the corporate income tax credit.
2) Circumstances where dividends have been imputed to income exempted from all Chilean income taxes: In these cases, dividends distributed by the company to the foreign holder will not be subject to Chilean withholding tax. Income exempted from Chilean income tax is expressly listed in the Chilean Income Tax Law.
3) Circumstances where dividends are subject to a provisional withholding tax: In the event that on the date of the dividend distribution there are no earnings on which income tax has been paid and there are no tax-exempt earnings, a provisional withholding must be made on the dividends at the time of payment to the foreign holders. This provisional withholding is calculated as if the dividends were paid from taxable income without corporate tax credit. In other words, dividends will be subject to a 35% Chilean withholding tax rate, but they will not receive a corporate tax credit of 17%.
The provisional withholding tax must be confirmed with information as of December 31 of the year in which the dividend was paid. This confirmation must be based on the companys effective income as of December 31.
4) Circumstances when it is possible to use in Chile certain credits against income taxes paid abroad, or foreign tax credit: This occurs when dividends distributed by the Chilean company have as their source income generated by companies domiciled in third countries. If that income was subject to withholding tax or corporate income tax in those third countries, such income will have a credit or foreign tax credit against corresponding Chilean taxes, which can be proportionally transferred to the shareholders of the Chilean company.
Taxation on sale or exchange of ADS, outside Chile
Gains obtained by a foreign holder from the sale or exchange of ADS outside Chile will not be subject to Chilean taxation.
Taxation on sale or exchange of Shares where shares or ADS were acquired on or before April 19, 2001
Gain recognized on a sale or exchange of shares (as distinguished from sales or exchanges of ADS representing such common shares) will be subject to both a 17% Chilean income tax and the 35% Chilean withholding tax (the former being creditable against the latter) if (i) the foreign holder acquired and disposed of the shares in the ordinary course of its business or as a regular trader of shares, or (ii) the foreign holder and the purchaser of the shares are related parties within the meaning of the Chilean Income Tax Law. In all other cases, gains on the disposition of shares will be subject to a 17% Chilean income tax but will not be subject to the 35% Chilean withholding tax. The date of acquisition of the ADS is considered to be the date of acquisition of the shares for which the ADS are exchanged.
Taxation on sale or exchange of Shares where Shares or ADS were acquired after April 19, 2001
The Chilean Income Tax Law includes a tax exemption on capital gains arising from the sale of shares of listed companies traded in the stock markets. Although there are certain restrictions, in general terms, the amendment provides that in order to qualify for the capital gain exemption: (i) the shares must be of a public stock company with a certain minimum level of trading on a stock exchange; (ii) the sale must be carried out in a Chilean stock exchange, or in a tender offer subject to Chapter XXV of the Chilean Securities Market Law; (iii) the shares which are being sold must have been acquired on a stock exchange, or in a tender offer subject to Chapter XXV of the Chilean Securities Market Law, or in an initial public
offering (due to the creation of a company or to a capital increase), or due to the exchange of convertible bonds; and (iv) the shares must have been acquired after April 19, 2001. If the shares do not qualify for the exemption, capital gains on their sale or exchange, if any, will be taxed in accordance with the rules described in the preceding paragraph. In addition, if the exemption does not apply and the foreign holder has held the shares for less than one year, gains from the disposition of shares will be subject to both income and withholding tax as described in the preceding paragraph. The date of acquisition of the ADS is considered to be the date of acquisition of the shares for which the ADS are exchanged.
Taxation of Rights and ADS Rights
For Chilean tax purposes, the receipt of rights or ADS rights by a foreign holder of shares or ADS pursuant to a rights offering is a nontaxable event. In addition, there are no Chilean income tax consequences to foreign holders upon the exercise or the lapse of the rights or the ADS rights. Any gain on the sale, exchange or transfer of the rights by a foreign holder is subject to a 35% Chilean withholding tax.
Other Chilean Taxes
There is no gift, inheritance or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADS by a foreign holder, but such taxes will generally apply to the transfer at death or by gift of the shares by a foreign holder. There is no Chilean stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of shares or ADS.
Material U.S. Income Tax Considerations
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof. These authorities are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion assumes that the Depositarys activities are clearly and appropriately defined so as to ensure that the tax treatment of ADS will be identical to the tax treatment of the underlying shares.
As of this date, there is currently no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile. However, in 2010 the United States and Chile signed an income tax treaty that will enter into force once the treaty is ratified by both countries. There can be no assurance that the treaty will be ratified by either country. The following summary assumes that there is no applicable income tax treaty in effect between the United States and Chile.
The following are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to beneficial owners described herein of owning and disposing of shares or ADS, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular persons decision to hold such securities. The discussion applies only if you hold shares or ADS as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of your particular circumstances, such as if you are:
· certain financial institutions;
· insurance companies;
· dealers and traders in securities who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;
· persons holding shares or ADS as part of a hedge, straddle, integrated transaction or similar transaction;
· persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;
· partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
· persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;
· tax-exempt organizations;
· persons holding shares or ADS that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our stock;
· persons who acquired our shares or ADS pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; or
· persons holding shares or ADS in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States.
If an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares or ADS, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding shares or ADS and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of the shares or ADS.
You are a U.S. Holder for purposes of this discussion if you are a beneficial owner of our shares or ADS and if you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
· a citizen or individual resident of the United States; or
· a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; or
· an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
· a trust (i) that validly elects to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii)(A) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
You are a Non-U.S. Holder for purposes of this discussion if you are a beneficial owner of our shares or ADS and are not a U.S. Holder.
In general, if you own ADS, you will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by those ADS for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if you exchange ADS for the underlying shares represented by those ADS.
The U.S. Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom ADS are released before shares are delivered to the Depositary (pre-release) or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between holders and the issuer of the security underlying the ADS may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits for holders of depositary shares. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced tax rate, described below, applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate holders. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Chilean taxes, and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.
This discussion assumes that the Company is not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, as described below.
The summary of U.S. federal income tax consequences set out below is intended for general informational purposes only. You should consult your tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to you of owning or disposing of shares or ADS, including the applicability and effect of state, local, non-U.S. and other tax laws and the possibility of changes in tax laws.
Taxation of Distributions
Distributions paid on shares or ADS other than certain pro rata distributions of common shares will be treated as dividends taxable as ordinary income to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions generally will be reported as dividends.
Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013 are taxable at a maximum rate of 15%. A foreign company is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as the New York Stock Exchange where our ADS are traded. You should consult your tax advisors to determine whether the favorable rate will apply to dividends you receive and whether you are subject to any special rules that limit your ability to be taxed at this favorable rate.
The amount of a dividend will include the net amount withheld by us in respect of Chilean withholding taxes on the distribution. The amount of the dividend will be treated as foreign-source dividend income to you and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will be included in your income on the date of your, or in the case of ADS, the Depositarys, receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend paid in Chilean pesos will be a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate for converting Chilean pesos into dollars in effect on the date of such receipt regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. You may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into dollars on a date after the date of receipt.
Subject to applicable limitations that may vary depending upon your circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, the net amount of Chilean withholding tax (after reduction for the credit for Chilean corporate income tax, as discussed above under Item 10. Additional Information E. Taxation Chilean Tax Considerations Taxation of Shares and ADS Taxation of Cash Dividends and Property Distributions) withheld from dividends on shares or ADS will be creditable against your U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and, therefore, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in your particular circumstances. Instead of claiming a credit, you may, at your election, deduct such Chilean taxes in computing your taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits must apply to all taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year to foreign countries and possessions of the United States.
Subject to the discussion below under Information Reporting and Backup Withholding, if you are a Non-U.S. Holder, you generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received by you on your shares or ADS, unless you conduct a trade or business in the United States and such income is effectively connected with that trade or business.
Sale or Other Disposition of Shares or ADS
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the gain or loss you realize on the sale or other disposition of shares or ADS will be a capital gain or loss, and will be a long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the shares or ADS for more than one year. The amount of your gain or loss will equal the difference between your tax base in the shares or ADS disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in dollars. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. In addition, certain limitations exist on the deductibility of capital losses by both corporate and individual taxpayers.
In certain circumstances, Chilean taxes may be imposed upon the sale of shares. See Item 10. Additional Information E. Taxation Chilean Tax Considerations Taxation of Shares and ADS. If a Chilean tax is imposed on the sale or disposition of shares, and a U.S. Holder does not receive significant foreign source income from other sources, such U.S. Holder may not be able to credit such Chilean tax against his U.S. federal income tax liability.
Subject to the discussion below under Information Reporting and Backup Withholding, a Non-U.S. Holder of ADS or shares generally will not be subject to United States income or withholding tax on gain from the sale or other disposition of ADS or shares unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States or (ii) the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for at least 183 days during the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
We believe that we were not a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our 2010 taxable year. However, because PFIC status depends upon the composition of a companys income and assets and the market value of its assets from time to time, and because it is unclear whether certain types of our income constitute passive income for PFIC purposes, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were a PFIC for 2010 or for any prior or future taxable year during which you held shares or ADS, certain adverse consequences could apply to you, including the imposition of higher amounts of tax than would otherwise apply, and additional filing requirements. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the consequences to you if we were a PFIC, as well as the availability and advisability of making any election, which may mitigate the adverse consequences of PFIC status.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting and to backup withholding unless (i) you are an exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, you provide a correct taxpayer identification number and certify that you are not subject to backup withholding.
U.S. information reporting and backup withholding may also apply to Non-U.S. Holders that are not exempt recipients and that fail to provide certain information as may be required by United States law and applicable regulations.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to you will be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle you to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Legislation enacted in 2010 requires certain U.S. Holders to report to the Internal Revenue Service information with respect to their investment in shares or, it is assumed, ADS not held through a custodial account with a U.S. financial institution. Investors who fail to report required information could become subject to substantial penalties and/or an extended statute of limitations.
You should consult your tax advisors with respect to the particular consequences to you of owning or disposing of shares of ADS.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents.
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts.
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display.
We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, except that as a foreign issuer, we are not subject to the proxy rules (other than general anti-fraud rules) or the short-swing profit disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these statutory requirements, we file or furnish reports and other information with the SEC. Reports and other information filed or furnished by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the SECs regional offices at 233 Broadway, New York, New York 10279 and 475 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 900, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Copies of such material may also be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005, on which our ADSs are listed. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains information filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to risks arising from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These risks are monitored and managed by the Company in coordination with Enersis, our parent company. The Companys Board of Directors approves risk management policies at all levels.
Commodity Price Risk
In our electricity generation business, we are exposed to market risks arising from the price volatility of electricity, natural gas, diesel oil, and coal.
Natural gas is used in some of our power plants in South America. We seek to ensure our supply of this fuel by securing long-term contracts with our suppliers for terms that are expected to match the lifetime of our generation assets. These
contracts generally have provisions that allow us to purchase gas at market prices prevailing at the time the purchase occurs. As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we did not hold any contracts classified as either derivative financial instruments, financial instruments, or derivative commodity instruments related to natural gas.
In the countries where we operate using coal and diesel oil, the dispatch mechanism allows the thermal power plants to cover their variable costs. However, under certain circumstances, fuel price fluctuations might affect marginal costs. We transfer commodity prices variations to the sale contract prices according to indexing formulas but only to the degree that this is possible in our different markets. As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we did not hold any contracts classified as either derivative financial instruments, financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments related either to coal or to diesel oil.
Additionally, through adequate commercial risk mitigation policies, and a hydro-thermal power plant mix, we seek to naturally protect our operating income from electricity price volatility. As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we did not hold electricity price-sensitive instruments.
The Company is permanently analyzing ways for hedging commodity price risk.
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Risk
The recorded values of our financial debt as of December 31, 2010 are detailed below, according to maturity. Total values do not include the effect of derivatives.
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) |
| ||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilean $ /UF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
US$ |
|
40,193 |
|
23,432 |
|
200,548 |
|
19,465 |
|
111,272 |
|
189,234 |
|
584,145 |
|
769,303 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
6.9 |
% |
6.8 |
% |
8.8 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
8.9 |
% |
7.5 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
|
|
Other currencies (2) |
|
27,856 |
|
8,308 |
|
16,661 |
|
34,646 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
95,802 |
|
102,540 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
6.6 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
6.4 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
7.0 |
% |
7.1 |
% |
|
|
Total Fixed Rate |
|
68,049 |
|
31,740 |
|
217,209 |
|
54,112 |
|
111,272 |
|
197,564 |
|
679,947 |
|
871,843 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
6.8 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
8.9 |
% |
7.5 |
% |
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilean $ /UF |
|
7,900 |
|
7,233 |
|
7,725 |
|
7,908 |
|
8,421 |
|
386,616 |
|
425,804 |
|
461,935 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
8.4 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
7.1 |
% |
7.3 |
% |
|
|
US$ |
|
47,436 |
|
34,415 |
|
7,105 |
|
100,192 |
|
12,222 |
|
38,321 |
|
239,690 |
|
239,412 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
3.3 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
2.6 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
2.8 |
% |
2.8 |
% |
2.6 |
% |
|
|
Other currencies (2) |
|
86,765 |
|
83,997 |
|
3,139 |
|
13,596 |
|
61,184 |
|
168,664 |
|
417,345 |
|
454,323 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
10.2 |
% |
10.2 |
% |
10.3 |
% |
11.7 |
% |
8.2 |
% |
7.6 |
% |
9.6 |
% |
|
|
Total Variable Rate |
|
142,101 |
|
125,645 |
|
17,968 |
|
121,697 |
|
81,827 |
|
593,601 |
|
1,082,840 |
|
1,155,671 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
7.8 |
% |
8.2 |
% |
6.5 |
% |
3.4 |
% |
7.4 |
% |
7.0 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
210,150 |
|
157,386 |
|
235,178 |
|
175,808 |
|
193,100 |
|
791,166 |
|
1,762,787 |
|
2,027,514 |
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
(2) |
|
Other currencies includes the Colombian peso and the soles, among others. |
The recorded values of our financial debt as of December 31, 2009, are detailed below, according to maturity. Total values do not include the effect of derivatives.
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) |
| ||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilean $ /UF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
$ |
|
52,989 |
|
24,929 |
|
24,193 |
|
217,298 |
|
21,187 |
|
301,599 |
|
642,195 |
|
757,577 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
7.7 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
7.8 |
% |
8.3 |
% |
8.2 |
% |
|
|
Other currencies (2) |
|
12,046 |
|
9,647 |
|
19,540 |
|
17,541 |
|
35,734 |
|
8,770 |
|
103,278 |
|
113,593 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
7.9 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
6.3 |
% |
6.5 |
% |
8.2 |
% |
6.3 |
% |
7.2 |
% |
|
|
Total Fixed Rate |
|
65,035 |
|
34,576 |
|
43,733 |
|
234,839 |
|
56,921 |
|
310,369 |
|
745,473 |
|
871,170 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
7.7 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
6.6 |
% |
8.4 |
% |
8.1 |
% |
8.2 |
% |
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chilean $ /UF |
|
13,302 |
|
4,984 |
|
4,984 |
|
5,299 |
|
5,299 |
|
381,579 |
|
415,447 |
|
531,419 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
7.7 |
% |
3.6 |
% |
3.6 |
% |
3.6 |
% |
3.6 |
% |
2.3 |
% |
2.6 |
% |
|
|
$ |
|
169,589 |
|
141,445 |
|
48,551 |
|
7,474 |
|
107,068 |
|
24,156 |
|
498,284 |
|
498,284 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
2.3 |
% |
2.4 |
% |
3.0 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
2.3 |
% |
2.8 |
% |
2.4 |
% |
|
|
Other currencies (2) |
|
58,056 |
|
68,915 |
|
83,068 |
|
|
|
12,264 |
|
234,009 |
|
456,312 |
|
544,782 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
11.7 |
% |
11.2 |
% |
13.5 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
7.9 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
10.3 |
% |
|
|
Total Variable Rate |
|
240,947 |
|
215,344 |
|
136,603 |
|
12,773 |
|
124,631 |
|
639,744 |
|
1,370,043 |
|
1,574,485 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
4.9 |
% |
5.2 |
% |
9.4 |
% |
3.4 |
% |
2.9 |
% |
4.6 |
% |
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
305,982 |
|
249,920 |
|
180,337 |
|
247,611 |
|
181,552 |
|
950,113 |
|
2,115,516 |
|
2,445,655 |
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
(2) |
|
Other currencies includes the Colombian peso and the soles, among others. |
Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, 53.1% and 30.3% of our outstanding net debt obligations were subject to floating interest rates.
We maintain an appropriate mix of variable and fixed rate debt, calculated based on total net debt, according to the policy approved by our Board of Directors. We manage interest rate risk through the use of interest rate derivatives. The percentages mentioned above include the effect of interest rate derivatives (swaps or collars) that hedge the risk for part of our debt.
As of December 31, 2010, the recorded values for financial accounting purposes, and the corresponding fair value of the instruments that hedge for our interest rate risk, were as follows:
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) (1) |
| ||||||||||||||
Variable to fixed rates |
|
19,961 |
|
7,613 |
|
3,370 |
|
280,453 |
|
2,309 |
|
5,959 |
|
319,665 |
|
20,149 |
|
Fixed to variable rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
(1) |
|
Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2010, which was Ch$ 468.01 = $ 1.00. |
(2) |
|
Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
By comparison, as of December 31, 2009 the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair values of the instruments that hedge for our interest rate risk, were as follows:
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) (1) |
| ||||||||||||||
Variable to fixed rates |
|
37,998 |
|
24,942 |
|
25,122 |
|
1,826 |
|
101,420 |
|
|
|
191,297 |
|
(3,079 |
) |
Fixed to variable rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
(1) |
|
Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2009, which was Ch$ 507.10 = $ 1.00. |
(2) |
|
Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency risk arising from debt denominated in dollars, Chilean pesos and other currencies. Some of our subsidiaries have a natural hedge between their revenues and the currency in which their debt is denominated. For example, in the case of Emgesa in Colombia, both revenues and debt are linked to the Colombian peso. In other cases, we do not have this natural hedge, or we have it to a lesser degree, and we therefore try to manage this exposure with currency derivatives, such as UF/dollar exchange and dollar/local currency derivatives. However, this is not always possible because of market conditions. For instance, it is not possible in the case of Endesa Costanera in Argentina, because its revenues are linked to the Argentine peso and a substantial part of its debt is denominated in dollars, and there is no possibility of obtaining acceptable market conditions to hedge for this debt.
Since 2004, we have had a corporate currency risk policy. This policy takes the level of operating income of each country that is indexed to the dollar and seeks to hedge with dollar liabilities.
As of December 31, 2010, the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair value of the instruments that hedge for our foreign exchange risk were as follows:
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) (1) |
| ||||||||||||||
UF to $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
185,166 |
|
24,971 |
|
$ to Ch$/UF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
$ to Other currencies (3) |
|
6,174 |
|
4,680 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
(157 |
) |
(1) |
|
Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2010, which was Ch$ 468.01 = $ 1.00. |
(2) |
|
Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
(3) |
|
Other currencies include the Argentine peso and soles. |
By comparison, as of December 31, 2009 the recorded values for financial accounting purposes and the corresponding fair values of the instruments that hedge for our interest rate risk, were as follows:
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
| ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions of Ch$) (1) |
| ||||||||||||||
UF to $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
$ to Ch$/UF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
$ to Other currencies (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
81 |
|
(1) |
|
Calculated based on the Observed Exchange Rate as of December 31, 2009, which was Ch$ 507.10 = $ 1.00. |
(2) |
|
Fair values were calculated based on the discounted value of future cash flows expected to be paid (or received), considering current discount rates that reflect the different risks involved. |
(3) |
|
Other currencies include the Argentine peso and soles. |
(d). Safe Harbor
The information in this Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, contains information that may constitute forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking Statements in the Introduction of this report, for safe harbor provisions.
Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities
A. Debt Securities.
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights.
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities.
Not applicable.
D. American Depositary Shares
Depositary Fees and Charges
The Companys ADS program is administered by Citibank, N.A., as Depositary. Under the terms of the Deposit Agreement, an ADS holder may have to pay the following service fees to the Depositary:
Service Fees |
|
Fees |
Issuance of Receipt; deposit of Shares (including deposits pursuant to stock dividends or any other deposits) |
|
Up to $ 5.00 per 100 ADS |
Delivery of deposited Shares or other Deposited Securities against surrender of Receipt |
|
Up to $ 5.00 per 100 ADS |
Sale or exercise of rights |
|
Up to $ 2.00 per 100 ADS |
Depositary Payments Fiscal Year 2010
The Depositary has agreed to reimburse certain expenses related to the Companys ADS program and incurred by the Company in connection with the program. In 2010, the Depositary reimbursed expenses related to Investor Relations activities for a total amount of $ 204,892.
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
E. Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13 (a)-15 (e) and 15 (d)-15 (e) under the Exchange Act) for the year ended December 31, 2010.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error, and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Based upon the Companys evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is gathered and communicated to the Companys Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.
(b) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Endesa Chiles management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13 (a)-15 (f) under the Exchange Act). The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not necessarily prevent or detect some misstatements. It can only provide reasonable assurance regarding financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate over time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2010. The assessment was based on criteria established in the Internal Controls Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, Endesa Chiles Management has concluded that as of December 31, 2010, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective.
(c) Attestation Report
KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., the independent registered public accounting firm that has audited our Consolidated Financial Statements, has issued an attestation report on the companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. This attestation report appears on page F-3.
(d) Changes in internal control
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
As of December 31, 2010, the Directors Committees (which performs the functions of the Audit Committee) financial expert was Mr. Jaime Estévez, as determined by the Board of Directors. Mr. Estévez is an independent member of the Directors Committee, pursuant to the requirement of both Chilean law and NYSE corporate governance rules.
The standards of ethical conduct at Endesa Chile are currently governed by means of five corporate rulings or policies: the Charter Governing Executives, the Employee Code of Conduct, the Code of Ethics, the Zero Tolerance Anti-Corruption Plan (the ZTAC Plan) and the Manual for the Management of Information of Interest to the Market (the Manual).
The Charter Governing Executives was adopted by the Board of Directors in July 2003 and is applicable to all managers contractually related to Endesa Chile or its controlled subsidiaries in which it is the majority shareholder, both in Chile and abroad, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other senior officers of the Company. The object of this set of rules, included in the contracts of those subject to its compliance, is to establish the behavior of management with respect to the principles governing their actions and the limitations and incompatibilities involved, all within Endesa Chiles vision, mission and values. Likewise, the Employee Code of Conduct, explains our principles and ethical values, establishes the rules governing our contact with customers and suppliers, and establishes the principles that should be followed by employees, including ethical conduct, professionalism and confidentiality. Both documents also impose limitations on the activities that our executives and other employees may undertake outside the scope of their employment with us.
The Manual, adopted by Endesa Chiles Board of Directors in May 2008 and amended on February 2010, addresses the following issues: applicable standards to the information of transactions of the Companys securities or those of its affiliates by directors, management, principal executives, employees and other related parties; existence of blackout periods for such transactions by directors, management, principal executives, employees and other related parties; existence of mechanisms for the continuous release of information that is of interest to the market; and mechanisms that provide protection for confidential information.
In addition to the above mentioned corporate governance rules, the Board of the Company in its meeting held on June 24, 2010, approved the Code of Ethics and the ZTAC Plan. The Code of Ethics is based on general principles such as impartiality, honesty, integrity and other qualities of similar importance, which are translated into detailed behavioral criteria. The ZTAC Plan reinforces the principles included in the Code of Ethics, but with a special emphasis in avoiding corruption, in the form of bribery, preferential treatment, and other similar acts.
A copy of these documents is available upon request, free of charge, by writing or calling us at:
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.
Attention: Investor Relations Department
Santa Rosa 76, Piso 15
Santiago, Chile
(562) 630-9847
During fiscal year 2010, there have been no amendments to any provisions of the Charter Governing Executives and the Employee Code of Conduct. The Manual was amended in February 2010, to comply with the provisions of Law No. 20,382 (Corporate Governance Improvement Law). The Internal Regulations on Conduct in Securities Markets, approved by the Board on January 31, 2002, was revoked by the Board of Endesa Chile on June 24, 2010, because the requirements included in this document are also included in the Manual.
No waivers from any provisions of the Charter Governing Executives, the Code of Ethics, the ZTAC Plan or the Manual, were expressly or implicitly granted to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or any other senior financial officer of the Company in fiscal year 2010.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table provides information on the aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants, KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., as well as the other member firms of KPMG and their respective affiliates, by type of service rendered for periods indicated.
Services Rendered |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in million of $) |
| ||
Audit Fees (1) |
|
1.34 |
|
1.40 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) |
|
0.00 |
|
0.04 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
|
Total |
|
1.34 |
|
1.44 |
|
(1) |
|
During 2010, KPMG increased its audit fees expressed in dollars by $ 85,998 due to the appreciation of local currencies against the dollar. The fees are agreed to in local currency, in which there are no significant changes compared to 2009. |
(2) |
|
During 2010, KPMG provided the following services: Implementation of IFRS in Endesa Costanera $ 14,881, Endesa Chile sustainability report verification for $ 13,606 and the review of LNG contracts for $ 8,408. |
The amounts included in the table above and the related footnotes have been classified in accordance with SEC guidance.
All of the fees disclosed under Audit-Related Fees and All Other Fees were pre-approved by the Directors Committee.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our external auditors are appointed by our shareholders at the OSM. Similarly, the shareholders of our subsidiaries, which are located in countries where applicable law and regulation so establishes, appoint such subsidiaries external auditors.
The Directors Committee (which performs the functions of the Audit Committee), through the Economic Financial General Directorate, or EFGD, manages appointment proposals, review of engagement letters, fee negotiations, quality control in respect of the services provided, review and control of independence issues and other related matters.
The Directors Committee has a pre-approval policy regarding the contracting of Endesa Chiles external auditor, or any affiliate of the external auditor, for professional services. The professional services covered by such policy include audit and non-audit services provided to Endesa Chile.
Fees payable in connection with recurring audit services are approved as part of our annual budget. Fees payable in connection with nonrecurring audit services, once they have been analyzed by the EFGD, are submitted to the Directors Committee for approval or rejection.
The pre-approval policy established by the Directors Committee for non-audit services and Audit-Related Fees is as follows:
· the business unit that has requested the service and the audit firm requested to perform the service must request that the EFGD manager review the nature of the service to be provided.
· at that point, the EFGD analyzes the request and requires the audit firm that has been requested to provide the service issue a certificate signed by the partner responsible for the audit of our consolidated financial statements confirming such audit firms independence.
· finally, the proposal is submitted to the Directors Committee for approval or rejection.
The services described in footnote (2) to the table above and All Other Fees have been approved in line with the procedure described immediately above since July 2005.
In addition, due to the SEC release number 34-53677 File No. PCAOB-2006-01 (Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Certain Tax Services), the Directors Committee has designed, approved and implemented the necessary procedures to fulfill the new requirements described by this rule.
Item 16D. Exemptions from Listing Requirements for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Persons
Neither Endesa Chile nor any affiliated purchaser acquired any shares of Endesa Chile during 2010.
Item 16F. Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and through the date of this report, the principal independent accountant engaged to audit our financial statements, KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., has not resigned, indicated that it has declined to stand for re-election after the completion of its current audit or been dismissed.
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
For a summary of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those applicable to domestic issuers under the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange, please see Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees C. Board Practices.
None.
Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries
Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms: |
|
|
|
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa Chile) |
F-1 |
F-3 | |
Report of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes Ltda. Endesa Brasil S.A. |
F-5 |
F-7 | |
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
F-9 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
F-11 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
F-13 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
F-15 |
F-17 |
Exhibit |
|
Description | |
1.1 |
|
|
Bylaws (Estatutos) of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A., as amended.* |
8.1 |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010. |
12.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
12.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
13.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
SIGNATURES
The registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
|
EMPRESA NACIONAL DE ELECTRICIDAD S.A. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joaquín Galindo V. |
|
Name: |
Joaquín Galindo V. |
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 31, 2011 |
|
|
Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 together with the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries
Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms: |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa Chile) |
|
F-1 |
|
F-3 | |
Report of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
F-5 |
|
F-7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2010 and 209 |
|
F-9 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
F-11 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
F-13 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
F-15 |
|
F-17 |
Ch$ |
Chilean pesos |
US$ |
United States dollars |
UF |
The UF is a Chilean inflation-indexed, peso-denominated monetary unit that is set daily in advance based on the previous months inflation rate. |
ThCh$ |
Thousand of Chilean pesos |
ThUS$ |
Thousand of United States dollars |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa-Chile):
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the December 31, 2010 and 2009 financial statements of certain subsidiaries and nonsubsidiary investees carried on the equity method of accounting, which statements reflect total assets constituting 31.91 percent and 33.02 percent of the Companys consolidated total asset position as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and total revenues constituting 27.35 percent, 23.48 percent and 18.09 percent of the Companys consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Those consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the local statutory accounting basis were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those entities on such basis of accounting, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. Accordingly, we have audited the conversion adjustments to the financial statements of these subsidiaries and nonsubsidiary investees prepared in accordance with the local statutory accounting basis to conform them to the Companys accounting basis referred to below.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
© 2011 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Endesa-Chiles internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated April 27, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.
Santiago, Chile
April 27, 2011
© 2011 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.(Endesa-Chile):
We have audited Endesa-Chiles internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Endesa-Chiles management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Endesa-Chiles internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
© 2011 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Endesa-Chile maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report dated April 27, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda.
Santiago, Chile
April 27, 2011
© 2011 KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda., a Chilean limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Endesa Brasil S.A.
Niterói - RJ
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Endesa Brasil S.A., and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statement of income, statement of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements, prepared in accordance with accounting practice adopted in Brazil and presented in Brazilian real, are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Endesa Brasil S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil.
As discussed in note 2 to the financial statements, in the fiscal year 2010 the Company adopted the new accounting practices adopted in Brazil which contemplate the pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by CPC Accounting Pronouncements Committee and approved by CFC Brazilian Federal Accounting Council. The new accounting practices adopted in Brazil substantially changed all accounting pronouncements and standards which were in use through December 31, 2009. Therefore, the financial statements for the year 2009 have been restated to reflect the new accounting standards.
As mentioned in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the subsidiary Companhia de Interconexão Energética CIEN is discussing with the regulatory agencies to change C1ENs trading activity to transmission activity, in order to obtain the Allowed Annual Revenue (RAP).
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Auditores Independentes
Rio de Janeiro
April 26, 2011
|
|
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Endesa Brasil S.A.
Niterói -RJ
1. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Endesa Brasil S.A. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements, prepared in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil and presented in Brazilian real, are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
2. We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
3. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Endesa Brasil S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil.
4. As mentioned in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the subsidiary Companhia de lnterconexão Energética CIEN is seeking alternatives for new businesses, including the discussions with the regulatory agencies to change CIENs trading activity to transmission activity, in order to obtain the Allowed Annual Revenue (RAP).
DELOITTE TOUCHE Tohmatsu
Auditores Independentes
Rio de Janeiro
May 25, 2010
|
|
Deloitte & Touche Ltda. |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.:
We have audited the balance sheet of EMGESA S.A. E.S.P. (the Company) as of December 31, 2010, and the statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the three month period ended December 31, 2010 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management (none of which are included herein). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EMGESA S.A. E.S.P. as of December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three month period ended December 31, 2010, and the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Colombia.
Deloitte & Touche Ltda.
Bogotá, Colombia
March 25, 2011
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Deloitte se refiere a una o más de las firmas miembros de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, una compañia privada del Reino Unido limitada por garantia, y su red de firmas miembros, cada una como una entidad única e independiente y legalmente separada. Una descripción detallada de la estructura legal de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited y sus firmas miembros puede verse en el sitio web www. deloitte.com/about.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited es una compañia privada limitada por garantia constituida en Inglaterra & Gales bajo el número 07271800, y su domicilio registrado: Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, Reino Unido
|
Deloitte & Touche Ltda.
Tel. +57(1) 5461810 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of EMGESA S.A. E.S.P. (the Company) as of December 31, 2009, and the statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009 (none of which are included herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EMGESA S.A. E.S.P. as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Colombia.
Deloitte & Touche Ltda.
Bogotá, Colombia
March 25, 2011
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Deloitte se refiere a una o más de las firmas miembros de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, una compañía privada del Reino Unido limitada por garantia, y su red de firmas miembros, cada una como una entidad única e independiente y legalmente separada. Una descripción detallada de la estructura legal de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited y sus firmas miembros puede verse en el sitio web www.deloitte.com/about.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited es una compańía privada limitada por garantía constituida en Inglaterra & Gales bajo el número 07271800, y su domicilio registrado: Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, Reino Unido
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
ASSETS |
|
Note |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
5 |
|
333,269,859 |
|
446,438,229 |
|
Other current financial assets |
|
6 |
|
72,201 |
|
1,536,149 |
|
Other current non-financial assets |
|
|
|
6,625,837 |
|
9,068,636 |
|
Trade and other current receivables |
|
7 |
|
250,678,552 |
|
331,585,506 |
|
Accounts receivable from related companies |
|
8 |
|
79,032,363 |
|
69,160,836 |
|
Inventories |
|
9 |
|
42,139,761 |
|
40,179,588 |
|
Current tax assets |
|
10 |
|
81,208,150 |
|
44,392,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
793,026,723 |
|
942,361,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current financial assets |
|
6 |
|
28,295,886 |
|
4,141,795 |
|
Other non-current non-financial assets |
|
|
|
10,884,644 |
|
11,938,376 |
|
Non-current receivables |
|
7 |
|
126,461,117 |
|
66,716,465 |
|
Investment accounted for using equity method |
|
11 |
|
581,743,347 |
|
574,097,291 |
|
Intangible assets other than goodwill |
|
12 |
|
44,354,510 |
|
42,638,575 |
|
Goodwill |
|
13 |
|
100,085,306 |
|
105,545,382 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
14 |
|
4,253,906,589 |
|
4,326,989,360 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
15 |
|
96,113,683 |
|
94,924,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
5,241,845,082 |
|
5,226,991,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
6,034,871,805 |
|
6,169,352,612 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
Note |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current financial liabilities |
|
16 |
|
252,708,694 |
|
348,548,785 |
|
Trade and other current payables |
|
19 |
|
377,477,705 |
|
373,871,856 |
|
Accounts payable to related companies |
|
8 |
|
223,038,793 |
|
90,554,059 |
|
Other short-term provisions |
|
20 |
|
44,557,382 |
|
33,393,224 |
|
Current tax liabilities |
|
10 |
|
52,742,191 |
|
123,945,432 |
|
Current provisions for employee benefits |
|
21 |
|
2,703,107 |
|
3,448,733 |
|
Other current non-financial liabilities |
|
|
|
7,761,880 |
|
7,339,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
960,989,752 |
|
981,101,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current financial liabilities |
|
16 |
|
1,538,650,097 |
|
1,807,698,972 |
|
Other non-current payables |
|
19 |
|
3,738,357 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
Other long-term provisions |
|
20 |
|
20,918,513 |
|
20,160,585 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
15 |
|
347,009,839 |
|
347,876,619 |
|
Non-current provisions for employee benefits |
|
21 |
|
28,653,226 |
|
28,231,131 |
|
Other non-current non-financial liabilities |
|
|
|
30,084,829 |
|
21,712,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
1,969,054,861 |
|
2,233,249,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
2,930,044,613 |
|
3,214,350,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued capital |
|
22 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
22 |
|
1,442,314,476 |
|
1,106,819,324 |
|
Share premium |
|
22 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
Other reserves |
|
22.5 |
|
(603,550,240 |
) |
(575,456,324 |
) |
Equity attributable to owners of parent |
|
|
|
2,376,486,878 |
|
2,069,085,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
22.6 |
|
728,340,314 |
|
885,916,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
3,104,827,192 |
|
2,955,001,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
6,034,871,805 |
|
6,169,352,612 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$, except share data)
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
Note |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
23 |
|
2,397,944,527 |
|
2,406,367,778 |
|
2,531,561,947 |
|
Other operating income |
|
23 |
|
37,437,927 |
|
12,551,577 |
|
4,826,492 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
|
2,435,382,454 |
|
2,418,919,355 |
|
2,536,388,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and consumable used |
|
24 |
|
(1,191,327,819 |
) |
(976,145,889 |
) |
(1,304,453,135 |
) |
Contribution Margin |
|
|
|
1,244,054,635 |
|
1,442,773,466 |
|
1,231,935,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other work performed by entity and capitalized |
|
|
|
10,126,628 |
|
731,901 |
|
500,315 |
|
Employee benefits expenses |
|
25 |
|
(80,066,349 |
) |
(75,564,322 |
) |
(63,799,789 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
26 |
|
(179,007,900 |
) |
(196,142,075 |
) |
(186,604,575 |
) |
Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in profit or loss |
|
|
|
(706,125 |
) |
(43,999,600 |
) |
|
|
Other expenses |
|
27 |
|
(103,677,256 |
) |
(110,868,779 |
) |
(107,867,715 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
|
890,723,633 |
|
1,016,930,591 |
|
874,163,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other gains (losses) |
|
|
|
1,894,099 |
|
(25,294 |
) |
308,378 |
|
Financial income |
|
28 |
|
10,083,190 |
|
25,315,918 |
|
34,323,234 |
|
Financial costs |
|
28 |
|
(142,256,150 |
) |
(188,368,384 |
) |
(198,439,587 |
) |
Share of the profit (loss) of associates accounted for using the equity method |
|
11 |
|
91,673,758 |
|
98,457,836 |
|
82,131,590 |
|
Foreign currency exchange differences |
|
28 |
|
15,618,964 |
|
(17,017,325 |
) |
(5,828,382 |
) |
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
28 |
|
(3,162,695 |
) |
9,275,308 |
|
(18,950,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before tax |
|
|
|
864,574,799 |
|
944,568,650 |
|
767,708,440 |
|
Income tax |
|
29 |
|
(179,964,192 |
) |
(172,468,296 |
) |
(210,177,605 |
) |
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
Net Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of parent |
|
|
|
533,555,794 |
|
627,053,406 |
|
433,177,184 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
151,054,813 |
|
145,046,948 |
|
124,353,651 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
Ch$/share |
|
65.05 |
|
76.45 |
|
52.82 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
Ch$/share |
|
65.05 |
|
76.45 |
|
52.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
Ch$/share |
|
65.05 |
|
76.45 |
|
52.82 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
Ch$/share |
|
65.05 |
|
76.45 |
|
52.82 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$, except share data)
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of other comprehensive income, before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
(71,162,059 |
) |
(226,884,446 |
) |
156,276,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (losses) on exchange differences on translation, before tax |
|
(840 |
) |
55,354 |
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedge, before tax |
|
39,403,869 |
|
215,731,150 |
|
(333,277,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit plans |
|
(938,426 |
) |
(1,425,917 |
) |
(1,770,360 |
) |
Total other Components of other comprehensive income, before tax |
|
(32,697,456 |
) |
(12,523,859 |
) |
(178,771,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax relating to available-for-sale financial assets of other comprehensive income |
|
143 |
|
(9,563 |
) |
9 |
|
Income tax relating to cash flow hedges of other comprehensive income |
|
(7,544,962 |
) |
(37,339,636 |
) |
58,245,740 |
|
Income tax relating to defined benefit plans of other comprehensive income |
|
210,906 |
|
754,710 |
|
218,879 |
|
Total income tax |
|
(7,333,913 |
) |
(36,594,489 |
) |
58,464,628 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
(40,031,369 |
) |
(49,118,348 |
) |
(120,307,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
644,579,238 |
|
722,982,006 |
|
437,223,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of parent |
|
499,510,421 |
|
703,772,844 |
|
248,631,881 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
145,068,817 |
|
19,209,162 |
|
188,591,943 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
644,579,238 |
|
722,982,006 |
|
437,223,824 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in others reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Statement of Changes |
|
Issued |
|
Share |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of gains |
|
Other |
|
Othes |
|
Retained |
|
Equity |
|
Non-controlling |
|
Total equity |
|
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2010 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
73,027,963 |
|
79,113,232 |
|
|
|
50,090 |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
(575,456,324 |
) |
1,106,819,324 |
|
2,069,085,642 |
|
885,916,210 |
|
2,955,001,852 |
|
Changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,555,794 |
|
533,555,794 |
|
151,054,813 |
|
684,610,607 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
(53,180,003 |
) |
25,086,784 |
|
(5,951,457 |
) |
(697 |
) |
|
|
(34,045,373 |
) |
|
|
(34,045,373 |
) |
(5,985,996 |
) |
(40,031,369 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,510,421 |
|
145,068,817 |
|
644,579,238 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192,109,185 |
) |
(192,109,185 |
) |
|
|
(192,109,185 |
) |
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,951,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,951,457 |
|
(5,951,457 |
) |
|
|
(302,644,713 |
) |
(302,644,713 |
) |
Total changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
(53,180,003 |
) |
25,086,784 |
|
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
(28,093,916 |
) |
335,495,152 |
|
307,401,236 |
|
(157,575,896 |
) |
149,825,340 |
|
Equity at end of period 12/31/2010 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
19,847,960 |
|
104,200,016 |
|
|
|
49,393 |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
(603,550,240 |
) |
1,442,314,476 |
|
2,376,486,878 |
|
728,340,314 |
|
3,104,827,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in others reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Statement of Changes |
|
Issued |
|
Share |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of gains |
|
Other |
|
Othes |
|
Retained |
|
Equity |
|
Non-controlling |
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2009 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
171,195,873 |
|
(96,826,564 |
) |
|
|
4,299 |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
(653,274,001 |
) |
714,281,371 |
|
1,598,730,012 |
|
1,103,224,206 |
|
2,701,954,218 |
|
Changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627,053,406 |
|
627,053,406 |
|
145,046,948 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
(98,167,910 |
) |
176,903,759 |
|
(2,062,202 |
) |
45,791 |
|
|
|
76,719,438 |
|
|
|
76,719,438 |
|
(125,837,786 |
) |
(49,118,348 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703,772,844 |
|
19,209,162 |
|
722,982.006 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,757,816 |
) |
(231,757,816 |
) |
|
|
(231,757,816 |
) |
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(963,963 |
) |
2,062,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,239 |
|
(2,757,637 |
) |
(1,659,398 |
) |
(236,517,158 |
) |
(238,176,556 |
) |
Total changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
(98,167,910 |
) |
175,939,796 |
|
|
|
45,791 |
|
|
|
77,817,677 |
|
392,537,953 |
|
470,355,630 |
|
(217,307,996 |
) |
253,047,634 |
|
Equity at end of period 12/31/2009 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
73,027,963 |
|
79,113,232 |
|
|
|
50,090 |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
(575,456,324 |
) |
1,106,819,324 |
|
2,069,085,642 |
|
885,916,210 |
|
2,955,001,852 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in others reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Statement of Changes |
|
Issued |
|
Share |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Reserve of |
|
Other |
|
Othes |
|
Retained |
|
Equity |
|
Non-controlling |
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2008 |
|
1,222,877,948 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
84,113,627 |
|
169,086,413 |
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
(578,428,489 |
) |
(325,224,104 |
) |
434,036,610 |
|
1,537,699,011 |
|
937,572,442 |
|
2,475,271,453 |
|
Changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,177,184 |
|
433,177,184 |
|
124,353,651 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
87,082,246 |
|
(265,912,977 |
) |
(5,714,526 |
) |
(46 |
) |
|
|
(184,545,303 |
) |
|
|
(184,545,303 |
) |
64,238,292 |
|
(120,307,011 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,631,881 |
|
188,591,943 |
|
437,223,824 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,342,832 |
) |
(187,342,832 |
) |
|
|
(187,342,832 |
) |
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes |
|
108,836,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,714,526 |
|
|
|
(149,219,120 |
) |
(143,504,594 |
) |
34,410,409 |
|
(258,048 |
) |
(22,940,179 |
) |
(23,198,227 |
) |
Total changes in equity |
|
108,836,137 |
|
|
|
87,082,246 |
|
(265,912,977 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
(149,219,120 |
) |
(328,049,897 |
) |
280,244,761 |
|
61,031,001 |
|
165,651,764 |
|
226,682,765 |
|
Equity at end of period 12/31/2008 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
171,195,873 |
|
(96,826,564 |
) |
|
|
4,299 |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
(653,274,001 |
) |
714,281,371 |
|
1,598,730,012 |
|
1,103,224,206 |
|
2,701,954,218 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
Indirect Statement of Cash Flows |
|
Note |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for income tax expense |
|
29 |
|
179,964,192 |
|
172,468,296 |
|
210,177,605 |
|
Adjustments for decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
|
(873,778 |
) |
(793,538 |
) |
11,986,371 |
|
Adjustments for decrease (increase) in trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
(76,456,490 |
) |
13,387,623 |
|
(107,070,706 |
) |
Adjustments for decrease (increase) in other operating receivables |
|
|
|
(10,083,190 |
) |
(25,315,918 |
) |
(34,323,234 |
) |
Adjustments for increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable |
|
|
|
(12,215,651 |
) |
(130,366,242 |
) |
14,956,481 |
|
Adjustments for increase (decrease) in other operating payables |
|
|
|
139,998,316 |
|
165,776,683 |
|
209,435,974 |
|
Adjustments for depreciation and amortization expense |
|
26 |
|
179,007,900 |
|
196,142,075 |
|
186,604,575 |
|
Adjustments for impairment loss (reversal of impairment loss) recognised in profit or loss |
|
14 |
|
706,125 |
|
43,999,600 |
|
|
|
Adjustments for provisions |
|
|
|
(495,581 |
) |
3,249,264 |
|
2,223,497 |
|
Adjustments for unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains) |
|
28 |
|
(15,618,964 |
) |
17,017,325 |
|
5,828,382 |
|
Adjustments for undistributed profits of associates |
|
11 |
|
(91,673,758 |
) |
(98,457,836 |
) |
(82,131,590 |
) |
Other adjustments for non-cash items |
|
|
|
140,165,662 |
|
51,002,270 |
|
54,319,612 |
|
Total adjustments to reconcile net income |
|
|
|
432,424,783 |
|
408,109,602 |
|
472,006,967 |
|
Income taxes refund (paid) |
|
|
|
(261,341,269 |
) |
(184,639,994 |
) |
(78,599,380 |
) |
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
855,694,121 |
|
995,569,962 |
|
950,938,422 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands of Chilean pesos ThCh$)
Indirect Statement of Cash Flows |
|
Note |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used to acquire non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
(88,979,632 |
) |
(208,922,322 |
) |
|
|
Loans to related companies |
|
|
|
(125,666,819 |
) |
(8,974,911 |
) |
(47,066,212 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
1,463,080 |
|
4,806,509 |
|
6,536,995 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
(254,609,306 |
) |
(315,589,508 |
) |
(255,117,543 |
) |
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
|
|
(4,180,226 |
) |
(411,575 |
) |
(2,487,916 |
) |
Purchase of other long-term assets |
|
|
|
(263,466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends received |
|
|
|
54,218,010 |
|
75,347,648 |
|
35,462,910 |
|
Interest received |
|
|
|
1,525,208 |
|
2,441,046 |
|
3,025,736 |
|
Other inflows (outflows) of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
9,847,726 |
|
57,974,013 |
|
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
(416,493,151 |
) |
(441,455,387 |
) |
(201,672,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
152,550,484 |
|
356,837,676 |
|
575,829,749 |
|
Proceeds from loans from related companies |
|
|
|
162,244,249 |
|
11,436,262 |
|
58,060,070 |
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
|
(436,075,044 |
) |
(671,425,988 |
) |
(355,312,454 |
) |
Payments of finance lease liabilities |
|
|
|
(22,261,038 |
) |
(3,171,884 |
) |
(6,996,069 |
) |
Repayment of loans to related companies |
|
|
|
|
|
(58,538,059 |
) |
(6,198,854 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
(303,502,026 |
) |
(321,098,242 |
) |
(248,859,257 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
|
(118,988,001 |
) |
(114,393,219 |
) |
(163,445,494 |
) |
Other inflows (outflows) of cash |
|
|
|
18,140,940 |
|
|
|
448,471 |
|
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
(547,890,436 |
) |
(800,353,454 |
) |
(146,473,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
(108,689,466 |
) |
(246,238,879 |
) |
602,792,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(4,478,904 |
) |
(26,540,872 |
) |
1,329,548 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(113,168,370 |
) |
(272,779,751 |
) |
604,122,115 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
446,438,229 |
|
719,217,980 |
|
115,095,865 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
5 |
|
333,269,859 |
|
446,438,229 |
|
719,217,980 |
|
The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Índex
| |||||
|
| ||||
Basis of presentation of the consolidated financial statements. |
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| |||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
Provisions for post-employment benefit and similar obligations. |
| ||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Guarantee commitments to third-party, other contingent assets and liabilities and other commitments. |
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Summarized financial information for subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities. |
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||||
ENDESA CHILE AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010
(In thousands of Chilean pesos - ThCh$)
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE GROUP.
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (hereinafter, the Parent Company or the Company) and its subsidiaries Companies, compose the Endesa Chile Group (hereinafter, Endesa Chile or the Group).
Endesa Chile is a publicly-held corporation with its corporate domicile and principal offices at Avenida Santa Rosa No. 76, Santiago, Chile. The Company is registered as No. 114 in the securities registry of the Chilean Superintendency of Securities and Insurances. In addition, it is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and in the Spanish National Securities Market Commission, its stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1994 and on the Latibex since 2001, respectively.
Endesa Chile is a subsidiary of Enersis S.A., a company which in turn is a subsidiary of ENDESA S.A., a Spanish entity controlled by Enel, S.p.A. (hereinafter, Enel).
The Company was incorporated by public deed on December 1, 1943. Its existence was authorized and its bylaws approved on January 3, 1994 by Supreme Decree No. 97 of the Ministry of the Treasury. For tax purposes, the Company operates under Chilean tax identification number 91,081,000-6.
As of December 31, 2010, the Group had 2,371 employees. During 2010, the Groups average total employees were 2,312. See Note 32 for additional information regarding employee distribution by class and country.
Endesa Chiles corporate purpose involves generating, transporting, producing and distributing electricity. The Company also invests in financial assets, develops projects and engages in activities within the energy field and other areas in which electricity is essential, as well as participating in civil or hydraulic public works infrastructure concessions, either directly or through subsidiaries or associated companies, both domestically or abroad.
The consolidated financial statements of Endesa Chile for the year 2009 were approved by its Board at its meeting held on January 27, 2010, and were subsequently presented for consideration at the General Shareholders Meeting held on April 22, 2010, where they were finally approved.
These consolidated financial statements are presented in thousands of Chilean pesos (unless otherwise mentioned) since which is the company´s functional currency of the primary economic environment in which Endesa Chile operates. Foreign operations are included in accordance with the accounting policies established in Notes 2.5 and 3.k.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements of Endesa Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and approved by its Board at its meeting held on January 26, 2011.
These consolidated financial statements present fairly the financial position of Endesa Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, as well as the results of operations, the changes in equity and the cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared from accounting records maintained by the Company and its subsidiaries. Each entity prepares its financial statements according to the accounting principles and standards in force in each country, and through the consolidation process, the corresponding adjustments and reclassifications have been made in order to present the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS
2.2 New accounting pronouncements.
a) Accounting pronouncement effective from January 1, 2010
Standards, Interpretations and Amendments |
|
Mandatory application for: |
IFRS 3 revised: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009. |
Amendment to IAS 39: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009. |
Amendment to IAS 27: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009. |
Improvements to IFRS (issued in 2009): |
|
The majority of annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009. |
Amendment to IFRS 2: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010. |
IFRIC 17: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009. |
The application of these accounting pronouncements has not had any significant effects for the Group. The remaining accounting criteria applied in 2010 are consistent with those applied in 2009.
b) Accounting pronouncements effective January 1, 2011 and after:
As of the date of issuance of the present consolidated financial statements, the following accounting pronouncements have been issued by the IASB but their application was not yet mandatory.
Standards, Interpretations and Amendments |
|
Mandatory application for: |
Amendment to IAS 32: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after February 1, 2010. |
IFRS 9: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. |
IAS 24 Revised: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. |
IFRIC 19: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2010. |
Amendment to IFRIC 14: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. |
Improvements to IFRS (issued in 2010): |
|
The majority of annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. |
Amendment to IFRS 7: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011. |
Amendment to IAS 12: |
|
Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012. |
The Group is assessing the impact of the application of IFRS 9 from its effective date. In Managements opinion, the application of other standards, interpretations and amendments pending application will not have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of Endesa Chile and subsidiaries.
2.3 Responsibility for the information and estimates made.
The information contained in these consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys Board, which expressly states that IFRS principles and standards have been fully implemented.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, certain estimates made by the Companys Management have been used in order to quantify some assets, liabilities, income, expenses and commitments recorded in such statements.
These estimates basically refer to:
· The valuation of assets and goodwill to determine the existence of impairment losses (see Note 3.d).
· The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial liabilities and obligations to employees (see Note 21).
· The useful life of property, plant and equipment as well as intangible assets (see Notes 3.a and 3.b).
· The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments (see Notes 3.f.5 and 18).
· Energy supplied to customers and not invoiced at the end of each year.
· Certain magnitudes of the electrical system, including those of other companies, such as production, customer billing, energy consumption, etc. that permit estimations to be made for electrical system settlements. These settlements must be finalized in the corresponding final settlements, which are pending emission as of the date of issuance of the financial statements, and could affect the balances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses registered in such statements.
· The probability of occurrence and the amount of uncertain or contingent liabilities (see Note 3.j).
· Future disbursements for the closure of facilities and restoration of land (see Note 3.a).
· The tax results of the various subsidiaries of Endesa Chile, to be declared before the respective tax authorities in the future, which have formed the basis for recording different balances related to income taxes in the current financial statements (see Note 3.m).
Although these estimates have been based on the best information available at the date of issuance of the current consolidated financial statements, it is possible that events may occur in the future that will require a change (increase or decrease) in future, which would be done prospectively, recognizing the effects of such estimation change in the corresponding future consolidated financial statements.
2.4 Subsidiaries and Jointly-Controlled Entities.
Subsidiaries are entities in which the Parent Company controls the majority of the voting rights or, should that not be the case, is authorized to direct the financial and operating policies of such Subsidiaries.
Jointly-Controlled Entities are entities in which the situation described in the previous paragraph exists as a result of an agreement with other shareholders and control is exercised jointly with them.
Appendix No. 1 of the current financial statements, entitled Endesa Chile Group Companies, describes Endesa Chiles relationship with each of its subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities.
2.4.1 Changes in the scope of consolidation.
During 2010 and 2009 there were no significant changes in the scope of consolidation of Endesa Chile.
Appendix No. 2 of the current consolidated financial statements, entitled Changes in the scope of consolidation details the Entities entering into consolidation along with a detail of the related shares.
2.4.2 Companies consolidated with less than 50% share
Although the Endesa Chile Group holds less than a 50% share in Empresa Generadora de Energía Eléctrica S.A. (hereinafter Emgesa), it is considered a Subsidiary since Endesa Chile exercises control over the entity, directly or indirectly, through contracts or agreements with shareholders, or as a consequence of its structure, composition and shareholder classes.
2.4.3 Companies not consolidated with greater than 50% share
Although the Endesa Chile Group holds more than 50% of Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén, S.A. (hereinafter Aysén), it is considered to be a Jointly-Controlled Entity since the Group, through contracts and agreements with shareholders, exercises joint control of the entity.
2.5 Basis of consolidation and business combinations.
Subsidiaries are consolidated, incorporating into the consolidated financial statements all assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows after making the corresponding adjustments and eliminations for intra-Group transactions.
Jointly-controlled entities are consolidated on a proportional basis. Endesa Chile recognizes, line by line, its share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of such entities, so that the aggregation of balances and subsequent eliminations take place only in the proportions of Endesa Chiles share in them.
The results of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities are included in the consolidated comprehensive income statement from the effective date of acquisition until the effective date of disposal or termination of joint control, as appropriate.
The consolidation of the operations of the Parent Company and its Subsidiaries, as well as the jointly-controlled entities, was performed applying the following basic principles:
1. At the date of acquisition, the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary or jointly-controlled entity are recorded at market value. In the event that there is a positive difference between the acquisition cost and the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the acquired entity, including contingent liabilities, corresponding to the parents share, this difference is recorded as goodwill. In the event that the difference is negative, it is recorded with a credit to income.
2. Non-controlling interests in equity and in the financial results of the consolidated subsidiaries are presented, respectively, under the line items Non-controlling interests in the consolidated statement of financial position and Net Income attributable to non-controlling interests and Other comprehensive income attributable to non controlling interests in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
3. The conversion of the financial statements of foreign companies with functional currencies other than the Chilean peso is performed as follows:
a. For assets and liabilities, the prevailing exchange rate on the closing date of the financial statements is used.
b. For items in the comprehensive income statement, the average exchange rate for the year is used.
c. Equity remains at the historical exchange rate from the date of acquisition or contribution, and for retained earnings at the average exchange rate at the date of generation.
Exchange differences that occur in the conversion of the financial statements are registered under the heading Exchange difference on translation within the consolidated statement of comprehensive income: Other comprehensive income. (see Note 22.2).
Translation adjustments incurred prior to the date that Endesa Chile transitioned to IFRS, that is January 1, 2004, have been transferred to reserves, using the exemption for that purpose in IFRS 1 First time Adoption of IFRS. (see Note 22.5I).
All balances and transactions between consolidated companies, as well as the share of the consolidated companies, were eliminated in the consolidation process.
The Group has made certain reclassifications to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, as a result of new instructions issued on March 25, 2010 by the SVS through Circular No. 1975. These reclassifications relate mainly to regrouping of financial assets and liabilities within current or non-current, as applicable, and regrouping items under the statements of comprehensive income, but they do not affect the operating income
3. ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES APPLIED.
The principal accounting principles applied in preparing the attached consolidated financial statements are detailed as follows:
a) Property, Plant and Equipment.
Property, Plant and Equipment is valued at acquisition cost, net of accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses it may have experienced. In addition to the price paid to acquire each item, the cost also includes, where appropriate, the following concepts:
· Finance expenses accrued during the construction period that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualified assets, which require a substantial period of time before being ready for use such as, for example, electricity generation or distribution facilities. The interest rate used is that of the specific financing or, if none exists, the mean financing rate of the company carrying out the investment. The mean financing rate depends principally on the geographic area and ranges between 5.19% and 7.46%. The amount capitalized for this concept amounts to ThCh$ 11,744,123 ThCh$ 4,745,501 and ThCh$ 4,331,965 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively.
· Personnel expenses directly related to construction in progress, capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, amount to ThCh$ 10,126,628 ThCh$ 731,901 and ThCh$ 500,315, respectively.
· Future disbursements that Endesa Chile and subsidiaries must make to close their facilities are incorporated into the value of the asset at present value, recording the corresponding provision in accounting. On a yearly basis, Endesa Chile and subsidiaries review their estimate of these future disbursements, increasing or decreasing the value of the asset based on the results of this estimate. (see Note 20).
· Items acquired before the date on which Endesa Chile transitioned to IFRS, that is January 1, 2004, include within the acquisition cost, where appropriate, asset reappraisals permitted in various countries to adjust the value of Property, Plant and Equipment for inflation as of that date. (see Note 22.5I).
The construction in progress are transferred to operating assets once the testing period has been completed, when they are available for use, at which time depreciation begins.
Expansion, modernization and improvement costs that represent an increase in productivity, capacity or efficiency or a longer useful life are capitalized as a greater cost for the corresponding assets.
Replacement or overhaul of whole components that increase the assets useful life, or its economic capacity, are recorded as an increase in value for the respective assets, derecognizing the replaced or overhauled components.
Periodic maintenance, conservation and repair expenses are recorded directly in income as an expense for the year in which they are incurred.
The Company, based on the outcome of impairment testing explained in Note 3.d, believes that the book value of these assets does not exceed their net recoverable value.
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of its residual value, is depreciated by distributing the cost of the different items that compose it on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, which is the period during which the companies expect to use them. Useful estimated life is periodically reviewed and, if appropriate, adjusted prospectively.
The following are the main classes of Property, plant and equipment including their estimated useful lives:
Classes of Property, Plant and equipment |
|
Range of estimated useful lives (in years) |
|
Buildings |
|
22 - 100 |
|
Plant and Equipment (See below) |
|
3 - 65 |
|
IT Equipment |
|
3 - 15 |
|
Fixtures and Fittings |
|
5 - 21 |
|
Motor Vehicles |
|
5 - 10 |
|
Other |
|
2 - 33 |
|
Additionally, and for more information, there is a greater opening of the useful lives for plant and equipment class:
|
|
Range of estimated useful lives (in years) |
|
Generation facilities: |
|
|
|
Hydroelectric power plants |
|
|
|
Civil works |
|
35-65 |
|
Electromechanical equipment |
|
10-40 |
|
Coal/fuel power plants |
|
25-40 |
|
Combined-cycle power plants |
|
10-25 |
|
Renewable energy |
|
35 |
|
Transport and distribution facilities: |
|
|
|
High voltage network |
|
10-60 |
|
Low and medium voltage network |
|
10-60 |
|
Measurement and telecontrol equipment |
|
3-50 |
|
Other facilities |
|
4-25 |
|
The following table shows a detail of the duration period of those non-indefinite administrative concessions maintained by the Groups electrical companies:
Company |
|
Country |
|
Concession Term |
|
Period remaining until |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón (Generation) |
|
Argentina |
|
30 years |
|
13 years |
|
Endesa Chiles management evaluated the specific contract of term each of the aforementioned concession, which vary by country, business or legal jurisprudence, and concluded that no determining factors exist to indicate that the grantor, which in each case is a government entity, controls the infrastructure and, at the same time, can continuously set the price to be charged for services. These requirements are essential for applying IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements, which establishes how to record and value certain types of concessions (see Note 3b.1).
Gains or losses that arise from the sale or disposal of items of Property, Plant and Equipment are recognized in income for the period and calculated as the difference between the sale value and the net book value.
b) Intangible assets other than goodwill
IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements provides accounting guidance for public-to-private service concession arrangements. This accounting interpretation applies if:
a) the grantor controls or regulates which services the operator should provide with the infrastructure, to whom it must provide them and at what price; and
b) the grantor controls through ownership, beneficial entitlement or otherwise any significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.
If the aforementioned criteria are met simultaneously, an intangible asset is recognized on books to the extent the operator is entitled to charge the users for the specific use of the public service/facility, and if these charges are strictly based on the extent of use of the facility.
These intangible assets are initially recognized at cost, which is defined as the fair value of the consideration paid, plus any other costs that are directly attributable to the operation. Subsequently, these intangibles are amortized over the period of the concession.
The Group operates various administrative concessions where the counterparty is a government entity. The El Melón Tunnel concession is the only concession where determining factors exist to conclude that both aforementioned requirements are met.
In the El Melón Tunnel concession, the Chilean Ministry of Public Works (hereinafter MOP in its spanish acronym) and our subsidiary Sociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. entered into a concession agreement establishing both the services that should be provided by the operator as well as the price to be charged for these services. The concession right expires in June 2016, at which time MOP will recover the right to operate the assets associated with the El Melón Tunnel concession, without having to meet any specific conditions.
The Group has applied the intangible asset approach established in IFRIC 12. It has not recognized any financial asset related to the El Melón Tunnel, as the contract signed with the MOP does not establish unconditionally guaranteed revenue.
The Company that has recognized an intangible asset in relation to concession arrangements is as follows:
Company |
|
Type |
|
Country |
|
Term |
|
Remaining period |
|
Sociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |
|
Road infrastructure |
|
Chile |
|
23 years |
|
6 years |
|
b.2) Research and development expenses.
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries follow the policy of recording as intangible assets in the statement of financial position, the costs incurred in development projects as long as their technical viability and economic returns are reasonably assured.
Expenditures on research activities are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, no research and development expenses were recognized.
These intangible assets correspond primarily to computer software, water rights, and easements. They are initially recognized at acquisition or production cost and, subsequently, are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any.
Computer softwares are amortized, on an average, in five years. Certain easements and water rights have indefinite useful lives, as such, they are not amortized. Easements and water rights in some cases have indefinite useful live, as thus, are not amortized. In others cases, they have a useful live that, depending on their own characteristics, range between 40 and 60 years, term which is used to amortize the asset.
Criteria for recognizing impairment losses on these assets and, if appropriate, recovery of impairment losses recorded in prior years are explained in letter d) of this Note.
Goodwill generated upon consolidation represents the difference between the acquisition cost and Endesa Chiles share of the fair value of assets and liabilities, including identifiable contingent assets and liabilities of a subsidiary as of the acquisition date.
Acquired assets and liabilities are temporarily valued as of the date the company takes control and reviewed within no more than a year after the acquisition date. Until the fair value of assets and liabilities is ultimately determined, the difference between the acquisition price and the book value of the acquired company is temporarily recorded as goodwill.
If goodwill is finally determined to exist in the financial statements the year following the acquisition, the prior year accounts presented for comparison purposes, are modified to include the value of acquired assets and liabilities and final goodwill from the acquisition date.
Goodwill generated from acquiring companies with functional currencies other than the Chilean peso is valued at the functional currency of the acquired company and converted to Chilean pesos using the exchange rate in effect as of the date of the statement of financial position.
Goodwill generated before the date of IFRS transition is maintained at its net value recorded as of that date, while goodwill originated afterwards is valued at acquisition cost (see Note 13 and Note 22.5I).
Goodwill is not amortized, instead, at each period end, the Company estimates whether any impairment has reduced its recoverable value to an amount less than the net recorded cost and, if appropriate, immediately adjusts for impairment (see Note 3.d).
Until December 31, 2009, in those cases where the Group acquired an additional ownership interest in a company already controlled and consolidated, the difference between the price of the additional ownership interest and the balance of Equity attributable to non-controlling interests that was derecognized as a result of the acquisition was recorded as goodwill. In those cases where the Group sold part of its interest in a controlled company that did not result in loss of control, the difference between the sale price and the balance of Equity attributable to non-controlling interests was recognized in net income for the year.
Beginning in 2010, as part of the adoption of the amendments related to IAS 27 (Revised 2008), Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, any changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in loss of control are recognized within Equity attributable to owners of parent. During 2010, there were no transactions with non-controlling interests.
During the period, and principally at period end, the Company evaluates whether there is any indication that an asset has been impaired. Should any such indication exist, the company estimates the recoverable amount of that asset to determine, where appropriate, the amount of impairment. In the case of identifiable assets that do not independently generate cash flows, the company estimates the recoverability of the Cash Generating Unit to which the asset belongs, which is understood to be the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the case of Cash Generating Units to which goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life have been allocated, a recoverability analysis is performed routinely at each period end.
The recoverable amount is the greater between the fair value less the cost needed to sell and the value in use, which is defined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In order to calculate the recoverable value of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, value in use criteria is used by the Group in practically all cases.
To estimate the value in use, the Group prepares future cash flow projections, before tax, based on the most recently available budgets. These budgets incorporate managements best estimates of revenue and costs of Cash Generating Units using sector projections, past experience and future expectations.
In general, these projections cover the next ten years, estimating cash flows for subsequent years by applying reasonable growth rates between 3.3% and 6.7% that, in no case, are increasing nor exceed the average long-term growth rates for the particular sector and country.
These cash flows are discounted at a given pre-tax rate in order to calculate their present value. This rate reflects the cost of capital of the business and the geographical area in which it is carried on. In order to calculate it, the current time value of money and the risk premiums generally used by analysts for the business and the geographical area are taken into account.
The discount rates, before tax, expressed in nominal terms and applied in 2010 and 2009 are the following:
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
Chile |
|
Chilean peso |
|
7.5% |
|
8.7% |
|
9.2% |
|
9.5% |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine peso |
|
16.8% |
|
16.9% |
|
19.5% |
| ||
Brazil |
|
Brazilian reais |
|
9.6% |
|
10.8% |
|
11.3% |
| ||
Peru |
|
Peruvian sol |
|
7.9% |
|
9.1% |
| ||||
Colombia |
|
Colombian peso |
|
9.6% |
|
11.5% |
|
If the recoverable amount is less than the net carrying amount of the asset, the corresponding provision for impairment loss is recorded for the difference, and charged to Reversal of impairment loss (impairment loss) recognized in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Impairment losses recognized for an asset in prior periods are reversed when its estimated recoverable amount changes, increasing the assets value with a credit to earnings, limited to the assets carrying amount if no adjustment had occurred. In the case of goodwill, adjustments that have been made are not reversible.
The following procedures are used to determine the need to adjust financial assets for impairment:
· In the case of commercial assets, Endesa Chile and subsidiaries have defined a policy for recording impairment provisions based on the age of past due balances, which is generally applied except in cases where a specific collectability analysis is advised, such as it can be the case of balances receivable from public entities.
· In the case of receivables of a financial nature, impairment is determined by specifically analyzing each case. As of the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements, the Company had no significant past due non commercial financial assets.
Leases that transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership are transferred to the lessee are classified as finance leases. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Finance leases in which Endesa Chile and subsidiaries act as lessee are recognized when the agreement begins, recording an asset based on the nature of the lease and a liability for the same amount, equal to the lower of the fair value of the leased asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequently, the minimum lease payments are divided between finance expense and reducing the liability securised. The finance expense is recorded in the income statement and distributed over the period of the lease term, so as to obtain a constant interest rate for each period over the balance of the liability pending amortization. The asset is amortized in the same terms as other similar depreciable assets, as long as there is reasonable certainty that the lessee will acquire ownership of the asset at the end of the lease. If no such certainty exists, the asset will be amortized over the lesser term between the useful life of the asset and the term of the lease.
Operating lease payments are expensed on a straight line basis over the term of the lease unless another type of systematic basis of distribution is deemed more representative.
Financial instruments are contracts that give rise to both a financial asset for one company and a financial liability or equity instrument for another company.
f.1) Financial assets other than derivatives.
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries classify their financial assets other than derivatives, whether permanent or temporary, and excluding equity method investments (see Note 11) and investments held for sale, into four categories:
· Trade and other current receivables and Accounts receivable from related companies: These are recorded at amortized cost, which corresponds to initial fair value less principal repayments made, plus interest accrued but uncharged, calculated using the effective interest rate method.
The effective interest rate method is used to calculate the amortized cost of a financial asset or liability (or a group of financial assets or liabilities) and is charged to financial income or expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the discount rate that sets the cash flows receivable or payable estimated over the expected life of the financial instrument (or, when appropriate, over a shorter period) exactly equal to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.
· Held-to-maturity investments: Investments that Endesa Chile intends to hold and is capable of holding until their maturity are accounted for at amortized cost as defined in the preceding paragraph.
· Financial assets at fair value with changes in net income: This includes the trading portfolio and those financial assets that have been designated as such upon initial recognition and that are managed and evaluated using fair value criteria. They are valued in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value, with changes in value recorded directly in income when they occur.
· Available-for-sale financial assets: These are financial assets specifically designated as available for sale or that do not fit within any of the three preceding categories and consist almost entirely of financial investments in equity instruments (see Note 6).
These investments are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value when it can be reliably determined. Changes in fair value, net of taxes, are recorded with a charge or credit to an equity reserve known as Gain or loss for remeasurement of financial assets available for sale until the investment is disposed of, at which time the amount accumulated in this account for that investment is fully charged to the comprehensive income statement. Should the fair value be less than the acquisition cost, if there is objective evidence that the asset has been more than temporarily impaired, the difference is recorded directly in the comprehensive income statement.
In the case of interests in unlisted companies or companies with very little liquidity, normally the market value cannot be reliably determined and, thus, when this occurs, they are valued at acquisition cost or a lesser amount if evidence of impairment exists.
Purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for using their trade date.
f.2) Cash and cash equivalents.
This account within the statement of consolidated financial position includes cash and in banks, time deposits and other highly liquid, short-term investments that can be quickly converted into cash and have a low risk of value fluctuations.
f.3) Financial liabilities other than derivatives.
Financial liabilities are generally recorded initially based on cash received, net of any costs incurred in the transaction. In subsequent periods, these obligations are valued at their amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method. (see Note 3.f.1).
In the particular case that a liability is the underlying item of a fair value hedge derivative, it will be exceptionally valued at its fair value for the portion of the hedged risk.
In order to calculate the fair value of debt, both for cases in which it is recorded in the statement of financial position and for information on its fair value included in Note 16, debt has been divided into fixed interest rate debt (hereinafter fixed debt) and variable interest rate debt (hereinafter variable debt). Fixed debt pays, throughout its life, coupon interest fixed, either explicitly or implicitly, at the beginning of the transaction. Variable debt is issued with variable interest rates (i.e. each coupon is set at the beginning of each period based on a referential interest rate). All debt has been valued by discounting expected future cash flows with a market-interest rate curve based on the payment currency.
f.4) Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting.
Derivatives held by Endesa Chile and subsidiaries correspond primarily to transactions entered into to hedge interest and/or exchange rate risk, intended to eliminate or significantly reduce these risks in the underlying transactions being hedged.
Derivatives are recorded at fair value as of the date of the statement of financial position. If their value is positive, they are recorded in Other financial assets and if their value is negative, they are recorded Other financial liabilities.
Changes in fair value are recorded directly in income except when the derivative has been designated for accounting purposes as a hedge instrument and all of the conditions established under IFRS for applying hedge accounting are met, including that the hedge is highly effective. In this case, changes are recorded as follows:
· Fair value hedges: The underlying portion for which the risk is being hedged is valued at its fair value as is the hedge instrument, recording any changes in the value of both in the comprehensive income statement by netting the effects in the same comprehensive income statement account.
· Cash flow hedges: Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of derivatives are recorded in an equity reserve known as Reserve of cash flow hedges. The cumulative loss or gain in this account is transferred to the comprehensive income statement to the extent that the underlying item impacts the comprehensive income statement because of the hedged risk, netting the effect in the same comprehensive income statement account. Gains or losses from the ineffective portion of the hedge are recorded directly in the comprehensive income statement.
A hedge is considered highly effective when changes in the fair value or the cash flows of the underlying item directly attributable to the hedged risk, are offset by changes in the fair value or the cash flows of the hedging instrument, with effectiveness ranging from 80% to 125%.
The Company does not apply hedge accounting to its investments abroad.
As a general rule, long-term commodity purchase or sale agreements are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at their fair value as of period end, recording any differences in value directly in income, except when all of the following conditions are met:
· The sole purpose of the agreement is for own use.
· Future projections by Endesa Chile and subsidiaries justify the existence of these agreements with the purpose of own use.
· Past experience with agreements shows that they have been utilized for own use, except in certain isolated cases in which they had to be used for exceptional reasons or reasons associated with logistical management issues outside the control and projections of Endesa Chile and subsidiaries.
· The agreement does not stipulate settlement by differences and the parties do not make it a practice to settle similar contracts by differences in the past.
The long-term commodity purchase or sale agreements maintained by Endesa Chile and subsidiaries, which are mainly for electricity, fuel and other supplies, meet the conditions described above. Thus, fuel purchase agreements are intended to be used to generate electricity, while electricity purchase agreements are used to make sales to end customers and electricity sale agreements are used to sell its own production.
The Company also evaluates the existence of embedded derivatives in contracts or financial instruments to determine if their characteristics and risk are closely related to the principal contract as long as the set is not being accounted for at fair value. If they are not closely related, they are recorded separately and changes in value are accounted for directly in the comprehensive income statement.
f.5) Fair values and classification of financial instruments.
The fair value of the various derivative financial instruments is calculated as follows:
· For derivatives traded on a formal market, by its quoted price as of year end.
· Endesa Chile and subsidiaries value derivatives not traded on formal markets, using discounted expected cash flows and generally accepted options valuation models, based on current and future market conditions as of year-end.
Based on the described procedures, the Group classifies financial instruments in the different levels:
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices), and
Level 3: inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
f.6) Derecognition of financial assets.
Financial assets are derecognized when:
· the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the entity transfers the rights, or even when retaining them, it has assumed contractual obligations that determine the payment of such cash flows to one or more receivers.
· the entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset or, if it has not transferred or retained them substantially, when it does not retain control over the asset.
Those transactions in which the Company substantially retains all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of a transferred financial asset are recorded as a liability of the consideration received. Expenses attributable to the transaction are recorded in profit or loss under the effective interest rate method. (see Note 3.f.1).
g) Investments accounted for using equity method.
Investments in associates in which Endesa Chile has significant influence are recorded using the equity method. In general, significant influence is assumed in cases in which Endesa Chile has more than 20% interest.
The equity method consists of recording the investment in the statement of financial position based on the share of its equity that Endesa Chiles interest represents in its capital, adjusted for, if appropriate, the effect of transactions with subsidiaries plus any goodwill generated in acquiring the company. If the resulting amount were negative, zero is recorded for that investment in the statement of financial position, unless there is a commitment from Endesa Chile to support the companys negative equity situation, in which case a provision is recorded.
Dividends received from these companies are deducted from the value of the investment and any profit or loss obtained from them to which Endesa Chile is entitled based on its interest is recorded within Share of the profit of associates accounted for using the equity method.
Appendix No. 3 of these consolidated financial statements, known as Associates describes the relationship that Endesa Chile has with each of its associates.
Inventories are valued at the lesser of its weighted average acquisition price or its net realizable value.
Treasury shares are deducted from equity in the consolidated statement of financial position and valued at acquisition cost.
The gains and losses from the disposal of treasury shares are recorded under the heading Total equity: treasury shares. As of December 31, 2010, there are no treasury shares and no transactions with equity share were made during 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Obligations existing as of the date of the consolidated financial statements resulting from past events for which equity damage for Endesa Chile and subsidiaries is likely liable, whose amount and timing of payment are uncertain, are recorded as provisions in the consolidated statement of financial position at the present value of the most likely amount that it is believed that Endesa Chile and subsidiaries will have to disburse to settle the obligation.
Provisions are quantified using the best information available as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements regarding the consequences of the event causing the provision and are re-estimated at each subsequent accounting close.
j.1) Provisions for post-employment benefit and similar obligations.
Endesa Chile and some subsidiaries have undertaken commitments for pensions and other similar benefits with their employees. These commitments, for both defined benefits and defined contributions, are basically formalized through pension plans, except in relation to certain benefits in kind, primarily commitments to supply electricity which, given their nature, have not been outsourced and are internally provisioned.
For defined benefit plans, companies record the corresponding expense for these commitments using accrual accounting throughout their employees working lives by conducting, as of the date of the financial statements, actuarial studies calculated using the projected unit credit method. Past service costs from changes in benefits are immediately charged to income as benefits are accrued.
Contributions to defined contribution plans are expensed as employees provide services.
Actuarial losses and gains that arise in valuing the liabilities subject to these plans are recorded directly under Equity Retained earnings.
k) Conversion of balances in foreign currency.
Transactions carried out by each company in a currency other than its functional currency are recorded using the exchange rates in effect as of the date of each transaction. During the year, any differences that arise between the exchange rate recorded in accounting and the rate prevailing as of the date of collection or payment are recorded as Foreign currency exchange differences in the comprehensive income statement.
Likewise, as of each year-end, balances receivable or payable in a currency other than each companys functional currency are converted using the period-end exchange rate. Any valuation differences are recorded as Foreign currency exchange differences in the comprehensive income statement.
Endesa Chile and subsidiaries have established a policy to hedge the portion of its revenue from subsidiaries that is directly linked to the US dollar by obtaining financing in this currency. Exchange differences related to this debt, as they are cash flow hedge transactions, are charged, net of taxes, to a reserve account in equity and recorded in income during the period in which the hedged cash flows are realized. This term has been estimated at ten years.
l) Current/Non-current classification.
In the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position, balances are classified based on maturity (i.e. current balances mature in no more than twelve months and non-current balances in more than twelve months).
Should the Company have any obligations that mature in less than twelve months but can be refinanced over the long term at the Companys discretion, through unconditionally available credit agreements with long-term maturities, such obligations may be classified as long-term liabilities.
Income taxes for the year are determined as the sum of current taxes from Endesa Chiles numerous subsidiaries and result from applying the tax rate to the taxable base for the year, after allowable deductions have been made, plus any changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and tax credits, both for tax losses and deductions. Differences between the book value and tax basis of assets and liabilities generate deferred tax asset and liability balances, which are calculated using tax rates expected to be in effect when the assets and liabilities are realized.
Current taxes and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are not coming from business combinations are recorded in income or in equity accounts in the statement of financial position, based on where the gains or losses originating them were recorded.
Any fluctuations from business combinations that are not recorded upon taking control because their recovery is not assured are recognized by reductions, if appropriate, to the value of goodwill accounted for in the business combination.
Deferred tax assets and tax credits are recognized only when it is likely that there will be future tax gains sufficient enough to recover deductions for temporary differences and make use of tax losses.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all temporary differences, except those derived from the initial recognition of goodwill and those that arose from valuing investments in subsidiaries, associates and jointly-controlled companies in which Endesa Chile can control their reversal and where it is likely that they will not be reversed in the foreseeable future.
Any deductions that can be applied at a given moment to current tax liabilities are credited to earnings within the income tax account, except when doubts exist about their tax realization, in which case they are not recognized until they are effectively realized, or when they correspond to specific tax incentives, in which case they are recorded as grants.
At each accounting period close, the Company reviews the deferred taxes it has recorded, both assets and liabilities, in order to ensure they remain current and otherwise make any necessary corrections based on the results of this analysis.
n) Revenue and expense recognition.
Income and expenses are recorded on an accrual basis.
Revenue is recognized as a result of a gross inflow of economic profits originated during the normal course of business for Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries during the period, as long as this inflow of benefits causes an increase in equity that is not related to contributions from equity owners and these benefits can be reliably valued. Revenue is recorded at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable derived from such revenue.
Revenue from the provision of services is only recognized when it can be reliably estimated, based on the degree of completion of the services as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position.
Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries exclude from revenue all gross inflows of economic benefits received when acting as an agent on behalf of third parties, only recording inflows from its own activities as revenue.
Exchanges or bartering of goods or services for other goods or services of a similar nature are not considered revenue-producing transactions.
Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries record purchase or sale agreements of non-financial items that are settled by netting with cash or another financial instrument at their net amount. Agreements entered into and maintained in order to receive or deliver these non-financial items are recorded based on the contractual terms of the purchase, sale or utilization requirements expected by the entity.
Interest income (expense) is accounted for using the effective interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal of the investment (income) or debt (expense) during the corresponding accrual year.
Basic earnings per share are calculated as the quotient of net earnings (losses) for the period attributable to the Parent Company divided by that entitys weighted average number of ordinary outstanding shares during that period, without including the average number of shares of the Parent Company held by any subsidiaries, should that be the case.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, Endesa Chile and its subsidiaries have not engaged in any type of transaction with a potential dilutive effect that assumes diluted earnings per share differs from basic earnings per share.
Article No. 79 of Chilean Companies Act establishes that, except if unanimously agreed otherwise by shareholders of all issued shares, listed corporations should distribute a cash dividend to its shareholders on a yearly basis, prorated based on their shares or the proportion established in the companys by laws if there are preferred shares, of at least 30% of net income for each period, except when accumulated losses from prior years must be absorbed.
As it is practically impossible to achieve a unanimous agreement given Endesa Chiles highly fragmented share capital, as of the end of each year the amount of the dividend obligation to its shareholders, net of interim dividends approved during the year, is determined and accounted for in Trade and other current payables or Accounts payable to related companies, as appropriate, and charged to Equity.
Interim and final dividends are deducted from equity as soon as they are approved by the competent body, which in the first case is normally the Companys Board of Directors and in the second case is the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting.
The consolidated statement of cash flows reflects cash movements during the period, determined using the indirect method. The terms used in these cash flow statements are defined as follows:
· Cash flows: inflows and outflows of cash or cash equivalents, which are defined as highly-liquid investments maturing in less than three months with a low risk of changes in value.
· Operating activities: activities that comprise the Groups principal source of revenue as well as other activities that cannot be classified as investing or financing.
· Investing activities: activities that involve acquiring, selling or otherwise disposing of non-current assets and other investments not included in cash and cash equivalent.
· Financing activities: activities that bring about changes in the size and composition of equity and financial liabilities.
4. SECTOR REGULATION AND ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATIONS.
The electricity sector in Chile is regulated by the General Electricity Services Law contained in the Ministry of Mining Decree Law No. 1 of 1982 - whose text was rewritten and stated in Ministry of Economy Decree Law No. 4 of 2006 (Electricity Law) - and its corresponding regulations contained in Decree No. 327 of 1998. Three government entities are responsible for enforcement and compliance of the Electricity Law: the National Energy Commission (CNE), which has the authority to propose regulated tariffs (node prices) and develop plans for the construction of new generating units; the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (SEF), which oversees and enforces the laws, regulations and technical standards for electricity generation, transmission and distribution, liquid fuels and gas; and lastly, the recently-created Ministry of Energy (ME) which will be responsible of implementing and carrying out all public policies concerning energy and by virtue of being the leading agency over the SEF, CNE and the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN), it will ultimately strengthen the cohesion and coordination of the sector. Also, the Agency for Energy Efficiency and the Center of Renewable Energy are under the ME.
Additionally, the law establishes a Panel of Experts whose primary function is to resolve disputes between the different stakeholders in the electric market: electric companies, system operator, regulator, etc.
From a geographic point of view, the Chilean electricity sector is divided into four electricity grids: SIC (Central Interconnected System), SING (Northern Interconnected System), and two medium isolated systems: Aysén and Magallanes. The SIC, the principal electricity system, is 2,400 km long, linking Taltal in the north with Quellón, on Chiloé Island in the south. The SING covers the north of the country, from Arica to Coloso, approximately 700kms long.
There are three fundamental sectors within the electricity industry: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, which operate in an interconnected and coordinated manner and whose main objective is to provide electricity to the market at minimum cost while still preserving the quality and reliability of service standards required by electricity regulations. Due to the fact that the transmission and distribution sectors have economies of scale in their respective roles, they constitute natural monopolies and, therefore, are regulated by electricity standards which provide for free and flexible access to energy grids and provide regulated pricing.
According to the Electricity Law, companies involved in generation and transmission on an interconnected electric grid must coordinate their operations in a centralized manner through the Economic Load Dispatch Center (CDEC), in order to operate the system at the lowest cost while preserving reliability of service. In order to achieve this, the CDEC plans and operates the system, including the calculation of the hourly marginal cost, basically the price at which energy transfers between generators are set.
Therefore, the generation decision for each company is dependent on the CDECs operating plan. Each company may decide freely to sell its energy to regulated or unregulated customers. Any surplus or deficit between its sales to customers and its production is sold or bought from other generators at the Spot market price.
A generating company may have the following types of customers:
(i) Regulated clients: These are residential, commercial and small and medium-sized industrial customers that have a connected capacity of no more than 2,000 KW, and are located within the concession area of a distribution company. Until 2009, the transfer price between the generation and distribution companies for providing electric power to regulated clients had a maximum value called the node price, which was regulated by the Ministry of Economy. Node prices are determined every six months (April and October), using a report developed by the CNE based on the expected marginal costs of the system over the following 48 months in the case of the SIC, or 24 months in the SING. Since 2010, the transfer price between generation and distribution companies results from public tenders these entities conduct in a regulated process.
(ii) Unregulated clients: These are customers which have a connected capacity greater than 2,000 KW, mainly industrial and mining companies. These consumers can freely negotiate electricity supply prices with generation and distribution companies. Customers with capacity between 500 and 2,000 KW have the option to contract energy at prices agreed upon with suppliers or continue to be subject to regulated prices, but can only change between these two options once every four years.
(iii) Spot or short-term market: relates to energy and capacity transactions between generation companies, which result from the coordination by the CDEC in order to operate the system economically, and any production surpluses (deficits) with respect to commercial commitments are transferred by sales (purchases) to other generators that are members of the CDEC. In the case of energy, the transfers are valued at marginal cost; for capacity, transfers are valued at the corresponding node price, that is set biannually by authorities.
In Chile, the payments for capacity to each generator depend on a centralized calculation performed annually by the CDEC, from which the firm capacity of each plant is obtained. Such value is independent of each plants dispatch.
Since 2010, with the enactment of Law 20,018, distribution companies must have permanent supply for their total forecasted demand for three years, for which public tenders for long-term contracts must be conducted.
With respect to renewable energy, in April 2008, Law 20,257 was enacted; which encourages the use of Non-Conventional Renewable Energy (NCRE). The main aspect of this regulation is that it forces generators to ensure that at least 5% of their energy sold comes from these renewable sources between 2010 and 2014, progressively increasing annually by 0.5% from 2015 to 2024, when it will reach 10%.
Different regulatory frameworks exist in the other Latin American countries in which Endesa Chile operates. In general, the laws of Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Colombia permit the participation and investment of private capitals in the energy sector, defend freedom of competition for the generation segment, and define criteria to assure that certain levels of economic concentration and/or market practices do not damage their electricity sectors. Different from Chile, in these countries, state owned companies also participate in the energy sector and compete with the private companies in the generation, transmission and distribution segments.
In principle, companies are allowed to participate in different activities (generation, distribution, trading) as long as there is an adequate separation between such activities, in terms of both accounting and corporate structure. However, the transmission sector is where the greatest restrictions tend to be imposed, mainly due to its nature and the necessity to guarantee adequate access to all agents.
Regarding the electricity generation business, in general these markets are free and, based on indicative plans prepared by authorities, private actors are at liberty to make their own investment decisions. The exception is Brazil, in which pursuant to the needs of distributors, the Ministry of Energy participates in the expansion of the electric system, establishing capacity limits per technology (separate bids for thermal, hydraulic and renewable energy) or directly bidding specific projects; and Argentina, where, although the Government has promoted some initiatives to foster investments, such as Energía Plus, the increase in the installed capacity has not been as expected. On November 25, 2010, the Argentine Ministry or Energy and the electric generation market stakeholders signed an agreement which is expected to increase the development of new generation projects. This agreement was partially funded with the part of the debt the goverment currently maintains with the electric companies.
In these countries, the coordination of the operation is centralized, whereas one independent operator coordinates the dispatch of energy. With the exception of Colombia, where the dispatch is based on the prices offered by the agents, the rest of the countries have centralized dispatch based on variable production costs that aims at optimizing available generation resources at the lowest cost for the system. These dispatches are
used on the determination of the marginal cost of generation which also defines the spot price for the transactions.
However, today the governments in Argentina and Peru have sometimes intervened in the determination of energy prices in their marginal energy markets. Argentinas intervention mostly stems from the aftermath of the 2002 economic crisis, and Perus, as a result of a recently enacted Emergency Law of 2008, which defined the ideal marginal cost, considering as if existing restrictions on transmission or distribution capacity of gas and electricity did not exist.
In Colombia, Brazil, Peru and Argentina, generators are able to sell their energy through contracts with the regulated energy markets or in the unregulated market, and settle any energy surplus or deficits through the spot market. The unregulated market is mostly tailored to significant individual energy consumers, although the limits that define such consumer vary per country. These markets mostly differ on the way they regulate sales between generators and distributors and how the regulated price is defined for ultimate determination of rates and fares to end consumers.
In Argentina, initially the regulation considered that the sales price from generators to distributors was obtained from calculating an estimation of the forecasted average spot price of the upcoming six months. Nevertheless, following the 2002 crisis, the state has arbitrarily fixed prices, ultimately resulting on the intervention of the marginal system and thus causing a mismatch between the real generation costs and the payment perceived by generators from demand through distributors. In addition, the energy that can be sold by the generators is limited to the demand each had already sold through contracts during the period from May to June 2005.
In Brazil, the purchase price used in the determination of tariffs to end users is based on average prices of bids for new and existing energy. The new energy contracts consider that in the long-term all new energy generation projects should cover the expected growth of demand from distributors. The existing energy contracts consider minor short-term commitments to solely accommodate the energy needs from distributors that may arise from the expiration of prior contracts. Each bidding process is coordinated centrally, and the state establishes maximum prices, and as result, contracts are executed whereas participating distributors purchase from offering generators.
Distributors in Colombia may choose their energy supply, thus being able to structure the conditions of the public bidding process related to the energy supplied to the regulated market, and they are permitted to purchase energy from the spot market. The price paid by the end user is ultimately an average of the purchase cost. Since 2004, the CREG (Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Gas) is working in a proposal to modify the contracting mechanism in the Colombian market into a electronic system. This mechanism would replace current bids for energy tenders with standard commercial conditions where the demand to be contracted will be treated as un single aggregated demand.
In Peru, as in Chile, legislation was modified to allow energy tenders based on the requirements of the distributors. Today, there are some binding contracts between generators and distributors based on the charge price, defined from a centralized calculation; however, since 2007 all contracts are carried out through a formal tender process. The state approves all conditions of the tender and also defines a maximum price.
Except for Colombia, all countries have provided for the incorporation of renewable energy. In practical terms nonetheless, there are no significant incentives or actual obligations such as the ones in place for Chile, which would render these technologies more competitive if built on a higher scale. Governments must promote bidding processes specifically tailored at providing incentives for these types of technologies.
a) As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 this account is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Cash balances |
|
50,988 |
|
53,594 |
|
78,500 |
|
Bank balances |
|
93,172,693 |
|
193,220,208 |
|
73,538,335 |
|
Time deposits |
|
50,782,952 |
|
67,659,377 |
|
258,584,157 |
|
Other fixed income instruments |
|
189,263,226 |
|
185,505,050 |
|
387,016,988 |
|
Total |
|
333,269,859 |
|
446,438,229 |
|
719,217,980 |
|
Short-term deposits mature within no more than three months from their date of acquisition and accrue market interest for this type of short-term investment. Other fixed-income instruments correspond primarily to transactions with agreements to resell that mature in less than 30 days. There are no restrictions as to the disposal of significant amounts of cash.
b) The following table details the balance of cash and cash equivalents by currency:
Currency |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chilean peso |
|
152,647,257 |
|
152,554,270 |
|
159,432,786 |
|
Argentine peso |
|
13,504,738 |
|
11,629,007 |
|
15,309,637 |
|
Colombian peso |
|
74,588,339 |
|
160,969,953 |
|
133,927,140 |
|
Peruvian sol |
|
12,943,946 |
|
13,346,169 |
|
1,920,653 |
|
US dollar |
|
79,297,297 |
|
107,638,574 |
|
408,627,764 |
|
Brazilian reais |
|
288,282 |
|
300,256 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
333,269,859 |
|
446,438,229 |
|
719,217,980 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this item is comprised of the following:
|
|
Balances |
| ||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Non Current |
| ||||
Other Financial Assets |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Quoted investments available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
63,327 |
|
63,918 |
|
Unquoted or low liquidity investments available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
2,422,288 |
|
2,423,878 |
|
Hedge derivative instruments (*) |
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
25,387,885 |
|
590,622 |
|
Non-hedge derivative instruments (**) |
|
17,551 |
|
1,536,089 |
|
91,262 |
|
732,253 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
60 |
|
331,124 |
|
331,124 |
|
Total |
|
72,201 |
|
1,536,149 |
|
28,295,886 |
|
4,141,795 |
|
(*) See Note 18.2.a
(**) See Note 18.2.b
7. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this item is comprised of the following:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||
Trade and Other Receivables, Gross |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Trade and other receivables, gross |
|
252,783,856 |
|
126,461,117 |
|
334,241,556 |
|
66,716,465 |
|
Trade receivables, gross |
|
226,788,911 |
|
122,260,714 |
|
318,865,510 |
|
61,309,211 |
|
Other receivables, gross |
|
25,994,945 |
|
4,200,403 |
|
15,376,046 |
|
5,407,254 |
|
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||
Trade and Other Receivables, Net |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Trade and other receivables, net |
|
250,678,552 |
|
126,461,117 |
|
331,585,506 |
|
66,716,465 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
225,702,869 |
|
122,260,714 |
|
317,174,851 |
|
61,309,211 |
|
Other receivables, net |
|
24,975,683 |
|
4,200,403 |
|
14,410,655 |
|
5,407,254 |
|
The balances in this account do not generally accrue interest.
No individual customer makes up a significant portion of the Groups total sales or receivables.
Refer to Note 8.1 for the amounts, terms and conditions of receivables from related parties.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of unimpaired past due trade receivables is as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||
Trade accounts receivables past due and unpaid but not impaired |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Less than three months |
|
4,198,270 |
|
2,286,695 |
|
Between three and six months |
|
507,473 |
|
65,951 |
|
Between six and twelve months |
|
569,018 |
|
105,135 |
|
Greater than twelve months |
|
1,278,888 |
|
88,453 |
|
Total |
|
6,553,649 |
|
2,546,234 |
|
The following table details movements in the impairment provision for trade receivables:
|
|
Current and |
|
Trade receivables past due impaired |
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
2,626,594 |
|
Increases (decreases) for the year |
|
544,674 |
|
Amounts Written-off |
|
(421,144 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange increase (decrease) |
|
(94,074 |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
2,656,050 |
|
Increases (decreases) for the year (*) |
|
308,268 |
|
Amounts Written-off |
|
(161,484 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange increase (decrease) |
|
(697,530 |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
2,105,304 |
|
(*) See Note 26: Depreciation, amortization and impairment loss.
8. BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED COMPANIES
Transactions with related companies are made under market conditions.
Transactions with subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not detailed in this Note.
As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, there are no guarantees or allowances for doubtful accounts related to balances between related companies.
8.1 Balances and transactions with related companies
Balances of receivables and payables between the company and its unconsolidated related companies are detailed as follows:
a) Accounts receivable from related companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||
Taxpayer |
|
Company |
|
Description |
|
Term |
|
Nature |
|
Currency |
|
Country |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
78,970,360-4 |
|
Sociedad Agrícola e Inmobiliaria Pastos Verdes Ltda. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
549 |
|
7,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Colombia Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
|
|
Colombia |
|
349 |
|
10,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Comercializadora de Energía del Mercosur S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ar$ |
|
Argentina |
|
1,533,175 |
|
1,451,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica de Fortaleza S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,800,570-7 |
|
Chilectra S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
33,803,725 |
|
23,905,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,800,570-7 |
|
Chilectra S.A. |
|
Dividends |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,543,670-1 |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Ltda. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
9,087 |
|
14,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Companhía Interconexao Energética S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
US$ |
|
Brazil |
|
714,803 |
|
773,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
32,156,072 |
|
33,387,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Piura |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Soles |
|
Peru |
|
134,554 |
|
135,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Soles |
|
Peru |
|
8,269,289 |
|
8,843,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ar$ |
|
Argentina |
|
2,513 |
|
3,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,783,910-8 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda. |
|
Others |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
39,235 |
|
71,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
184,443 |
|
10,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Brazil |
|
86,611 |
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Dividends |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
156,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
94,271,000-3 |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
530,371 |
|
339,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Generalima S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Peru |
|
134,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,418,940-K |
|
GNL Chile S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
US$ |
|
Chile |
|
533,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,418,940-K |
|
GNL Chile S.A. |
|
Loans |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
312,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,788,080-4 |
|
GNL Quinteros S.A. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
458,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,107,186-6 |
|
ICT Servicios informáticos Ltda. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,800,460-3 |
|
Luz Andes Ltda. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
1,714 |
|
7,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Sociedad Portuaria Central Cartagena S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,529,420-1 |
|
Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. |
|
Services rendered |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
90,728 |
|
38,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
27,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,032,363 |
|
69,160,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
b) Accounts payable to related companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||
Taxpayer |
|
Company |
|
Description |
|
Term |
|
Nature |
|
Currency |
|
Country |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Foreign |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Colombia Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
285,958 |
|
385,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Perú Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
US$ |
|
Peru |
|
7,170 |
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Carboex S.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
5,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Comercializadora de Energía del Mercosur S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ar$ |
|
Argentina |
|
15,953,845 |
|
16,761,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,800,570-7 |
|
Chilectra S.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
2,634,690 |
|
133,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,543,670-1 |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
281,854 |
|
775,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
80,098,656 |
|
1,802,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ar$ |
|
Argentina |
|
562,269 |
|
637,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Piura |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Soles |
|
Peru |
|
52,354 |
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Soles |
|
Peru |
|
15,173 |
|
15,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,806,130-5 |
|
Electrogas S.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
217,889 |
|
290,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,783,910-8 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
20,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
59,240 |
|
42,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Latinoamérica S.A. |
|
Dividends |
|
More than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
España |
|
957,059 |
|
866,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
94,271,000-3 |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
985,797 |
|
258,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
94,271,000-3 |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Dividends |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
96,008,029 |
|
67,019,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
94,271,000-3 |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,418,940-K |
|
GNL Chile S.A. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Associate |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
23,427,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,107,186-6 |
|
ICT Servicios informáticos Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
504,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,107,186-6 |
|
ICT Servicios informáticos Ltda |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
17,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,913,810-7 |
|
Inmb. M. Velasco |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
22,011 |
|
81,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,800,460-3 |
|
Luz Andes Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,529,420-1 |
|
Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ch$ |
|
Chile |
|
677,595 |
|
1,063,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,529,420-1 |
|
Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
More than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
U.F |
|
Chile |
|
26,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Synapsis Colombia Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
CPs |
|
Colombia |
|
47,482 |
|
178,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Synapsis de Argentina Ltda. |
|
Mercantile current account |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Ar$ |
|
Argentina |
|
20,023 |
|
19,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Synapsis Perú Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
Soles |
|
Peru |
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Synapsis Perú Ltda. |
|
Services received |
|
Less than 90 days |
|
Common parent company |
|
US$ |
|
Peru |
|
140,388 |
|
209,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,038,793 |
|
90,554,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
c) Most significant transactions and their effect on earnings:
Transactions with unconsolidated related companies for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 had the following effects on earnings:
Taxpayer ID Number |
|
Company |
|
Nature of relationship |
|
Description of |
|
Country |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
78,970,360-4 |
|
Sociedad Agrícola e Inmobiliaria Pastos Verdes Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
49,870 |
|
34,531 |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Colombia Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Colombia |
|
(462,260 |
) |
(529,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Colombia |
|
18,832 |
|
52,013 |
|
|
|
96,800,570-7 |
|
Chilectra S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Chile |
|
315,880,308 |
|
284,501,577 |
|
245,609,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
1,965,720 |
|
2,975,377 |
|
2,783,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(2,546 |
) |
(2,189 |
) |
(785,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Chile |
|
(4,866,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Loans |
|
Chile |
|
|
|
616,084 |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Perú Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Peru |
|
(33,536 |
) |
(27,810 |
) |
(71,909 |
) |
96,783,910-8 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica de Colina Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Chile |
|
204,826 |
|
42,553 |
|
17,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Chile |
|
(16,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
31 |
|
260 |
|
|
|
94,271,000-3 |
|
Enersis S.A. |
|
Parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
1,081,260 |
|
1,018,125 |
|
1,067,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(1,997,448 |
) |
(937,096 |
) |
(1,167,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Parent company |
|
Loans |
|
Chile |
|
(955,224 |
) |
(3,065 |
) |
(98,667 |
) |
96,543,670-1 |
|
Cia A. Multiser. Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
12,188 |
|
14,254 |
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
943,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
CAM Colombia Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Colombia |
|
(55,379 |
) |
|
|
(833,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
73,208 |
|
96,529,420-1 |
|
Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
235,828 |
|
1,215,838 |
|
198,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(2,363,628 |
) |
(2,373,902 |
) |
(2,860,109 |
) |
Foreign |
|
Synapsis de Argentina Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Argentina |
|
(53,256 |
) |
(70,067 |
) |
(98,013 |
) |
Foreign |
|
Synapsis Perú Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Peru |
|
(662,426 |
) |
(426,060 |
) |
(458,535 |
) |
Foreign |
|
Synapsis Colombia Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Colombia |
|
(533,088 |
) |
(706,149 |
) |
(784,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Loans |
|
Colombia |
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Argentina |
|
30,860 |
|
40,377 |
|
|
|
96,800,460-3 |
|
Luz Andes Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energysales |
|
Chile |
|
26,066 |
|
13,080 |
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Chile |
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Colombia |
|
141,854,364 |
|
137,288,265 |
|
93,237,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Eenergy purchase |
|
Colombia |
|
(111,254 |
) |
(340,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Colombia |
|
95,231 |
|
89,794 |
|
104,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Colombia |
|
(445,908 |
) |
|
|
(523,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Loans |
|
Colombia |
|
(1,130,297 |
) |
(1,799,469 |
) |
(184,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Colombia |
|
(20,283,029 |
) |
(20,387,037 |
) |
(18,341,786 |
) |
Foreign |
|
Comercializadora de Energía del Mercosur S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Energy sales |
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
12,489,207 |
|
20,669,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Energy purchase |
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
(89,810 |
) |
(94,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Gas consumption |
|
Argentina |
|
|
|
(55,180,792 |
) |
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Peru |
|
109,531,161 |
|
77,262,815 |
|
42,033,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Peru |
|
(150,526 |
) |
(104,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Peru |
|
(74,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Central Generadora Termoeléctrica de Fortaleza S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
33,715 |
|
43,951 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Services rendered |
|
Brazil |
|
626,134 |
|
405,901 |
|
981,558 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Servicios S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
España |
|
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
|
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Piura |
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Peru |
|
3,512 |
|
929,179 |
|
93,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy purchase |
|
Peru |
|
(5,418,295 |
) |
(1,214,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Peru |
|
196,624 |
|
41,403 |
|
9,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Peru |
|
(48,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Generalima S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Peru |
|
392,235 |
|
111,514 |
|
|
|
96,806,130-5 |
|
Consorcio Ara-Ingendesa Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
|
|
|
|
505,331 |
|
Foreign |
|
Empresa de Energía de Cundinamarca S.A. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Electricity tolls |
|
Colombia |
|
(179,597 |
) |
(315,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Energy sales |
|
Colombia |
|
4,250,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,788,080-4 |
|
GNL Quinteros S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Energy sales |
|
Chile |
|
418,290 |
|
398,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Loans |
|
Chile |
|
|
|
(247,192 |
) |
1,748,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
86,563 |
|
37,651 |
|
|
|
96,806,130-5 |
|
Electrogas S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Gas tolls |
|
Chile |
|
(2,608,180 |
) |
(1,239,471 |
) |
(4,576,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Fuel consumption |
|
Chile |
|
(206,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
76,418,940-K |
|
GNL Chile S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Gas consumption |
|
Chile |
|
(143,303,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Loans |
|
Chile |
|
49,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Gas tolls |
|
Chile |
|
14,109,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,107,186-6 |
|
ICT Servicios informáticos Ltda. |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(431,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common parent company |
|
Services rendered |
|
Chile |
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
79,913,810-7 |
|
Inmb. M. Velasco |
|
Common parent company |
|
Services received |
|
Chile |
|
(93,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
96,524,140-K |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Panguipulli S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Energy sales |
|
Chile |
|
8,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Energy purchase |
|
Chile |
|
(3,554,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
96,880,800-1 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Puyehue S.A. |
|
Associate |
|
Energy sales |
|
Chile |
|
48,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate |
|
Energy purchase |
|
Chile |
|
(1,919,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
400,163,547 |
|
433,616,591 |
|
378,305,063 |
|
Short-term funds transfers between related parties are structured using current accounts, for which a monthly variable interest rate has been established, based on market conditions. Receivables and payables originated in this way are essentially due in 30 days, automatically renewable for equal periods and amortized based on cash flow generation.
8.2 Board of directors and key management personnel.
Endesa Chile is managed by Board of Directors composed of nine members, who hold their positions for three years and may be reelected.
The Board of Directors was elected in the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting on April 22, 2010. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary of the Board were appointed in a Board meeting on April 23, 2010.
a) Accounts receivable and payable and other transactions
· Accounts receivable and payable
There are no outstanding receivable or payable balances between the Company and its Directors and Group Management.
· Other transactions
There are no transactions between the Company and its Directors and Group Management.
b) Compensation of Directors.
In conformity with article 33 of Law No. 18,046 of the Corporations Law, the compensation of the Board of Directors is set annually by shareholders of Endesa Chile`s shareholders at the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting. The benefits described below regarding the methodology used to determine compensation has not changed since 2001.
Accordingly, compensation is determined as follows:
· UF 55.00 as unconditional fixed monthly compensation, and
· UF 36.00 for attending each meeting.
In both cases, these amounts are increased by 100% for the Chairman and 50% for the Vice Chairman.
If a Director of Endesa Chile also participates in more than one Board of Directors of its subsidiaries and/or associates, either in Chile or abroad, or acts as a director or advisor to other Chilean or foreign companies or legal entities in which Endesa Chile directly or indirectly holds any interest, he may only receive compensation from one of these Boards of Directors or Managing Councils.
The executives of Endesa Chile and/or its subsidiaries or associates, either in Chile or abroad, shall not receive compensation or allowances for acting as directors of any of Endesa Chiles subsidiaries, associates or interests in any way, either in Chile or abroad.
Directors committee
Each member of the Directors Committee receives an allowance of UF 121.33 for each meeting attended, with a maximum of twelve meetings per year.
As a result of the enactment of Law No. 20,382 on perfecting of Corporate Governance, there was a merger between the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee.
The following table details the Board of Directors compensation for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 years:
|
|
|
|
12/31/2010 |
| ||||||||||
Name |
|
Position |
|
Period in position |
|
Board of Endesa |
|
Board of |
|
Directors Committee |
|
Audit Committee |
|
Variable based on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Jorge Rosenblut Ratinoff |
|
Chairman |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
44,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paolo Bondi (1) |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Estévez Valencia |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
23,094 |
|
|
|
23,643 |
|
752 |
|
|
|
Francesco Buresti (1) |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonidas Vial Echeverría |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 04/22/10 |
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gerardo Jofré Miranda |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 02/28/10 |
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borja Prado Eulate |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 04/22/10 |
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José María Calvo-Sotelo Ibañez-Martín (2) |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
40,839 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
Luis de Guindos Jurado |
|
Director |
|
01/01/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
25,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
Vittorio Corbo |
|
Director |
|
04/22/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Bauza Bauza |
|
Director |
|
04/22/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
Felipe Lamarca Claro |
|
Director |
|
04/22/10 to 12/31/10 |
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
15,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
194,311 |
|
|
|
63,506 |
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||||||||
Name |
|
Position |
|
Period in position |
|
Board of Endesa |
|
Board of |
|
Directors Committee |
|
Audit Committee |
|
Variable based on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Mario Valcarce Durán |
|
Chairman |
|
01/01/09 to 10/28/09 |
|
39,270 |
|
|
|
9,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
Juan Gallardo Cruces |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
01/01/09 to 03/26/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paolo Bondi (1) |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
07/28/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrea Bertran (1) |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
03/26/09 to 07/28/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francesco Buresti (1) |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pío Cabanillas Alonso (1) |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 03/26/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fernando DOrnellas Silva |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 07/28/09 |
|
12,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
Jaime Estévez Valencia |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
22,528 |
|
|
|
10,575 |
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
Borja Prado Eulate |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
Raimundo Valenzuela Lang |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 03/26/09 |
|
4,844 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leonidas Vial Valenzuela |
|
Director |
|
01/01/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
22,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José María Calvo-Sotelo Ibañez-Martín (2) |
|
Director |
|
03/26/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerardo Jofré Miranda |
|
Director |
|
04/15/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
16,763 |
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
Luis de Guindos Jurado |
|
Director |
|
07/28/09 to 12/31/09 |
|
8,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
145,096 |
|
|
|
30,201 |
|
9,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2008 |
| ||||||||||
Name |
|
Position |
|
Period in position |
|
Board of Endesa |
|
Board of |
|
Directors Committee |
|
Audit Committee |
|
Variable based on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Mario Valcarce Durán |
|
Chairman |
|
01/01/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
30,002 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Juan Gallardo Cruces |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
04/02/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Estévez Valencia |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
15,341 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
Leonidas Vial Echeverría |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
15,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raimundo Valenzuela Lang |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
14,642 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carlos Torres Vila |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 03/30/08 |
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enrique García Alvarez |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 03/30/08 |
|
4,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
José Fernández Olano |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 03/30/08 |
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
Rafael Español Navarro |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 03/30/08 |
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jose Maria Calvo-Sotelo |
|
Director |
|
01/01/08 to 03/30/08 |
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borja Prado Eulate |
|
Director |
|
04/02/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
Fernando DOrnellas Silva |
|
Director |
|
04/02/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
Francesco Buresti |
|
Director |
|
04/02/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pío Cabanillas Alonso |
|
Director |
|
04/02/08 to 12/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
120,305 |
|
|
|
16,647 |
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
(1) Messrs. Paolo Bondi, Franceso Buresti, Juan Gallardo Cruces, Andrea Bertran, Pío Cabanillas Alonso waived their salaries as members of the Companys Board of Directors.
(2) During 2010, José María Calvo-Sotelo Ibañez-Martin was paid ThCh$ 19,218 which was accrued in 2009.
c) Guarantees established by the Company in favor of the Directors.
The Company has established no guarantees in favor of the Directors.
8.3 Compensation of key management personnel.
a) Compensation received by key management personnel
|
|
Members of Upper Management | ||
Chilean Tax ID |
|
Name |
|
Position |
23,295,610-0 |
|
Joaquín Galindo Vélez |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
7,289,154-6 |
|
Claudio Iglesis Guillard |
|
Electricity Production Officer |
5,899,848-6 |
|
Juan Benabarre Benaiges |
|
Engineering, Projects and Research Development Officer |
7,893,919-2 |
|
José Venegas Maluenda |
|
Trading & Marketing Officer |
7,984,912-K |
|
Eduardo Escaffi Johnson |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
23,303,647-1 |
|
Luis Larumbe Aragón (1) |
|
Planning & Control Officer |
9,909,337-4 |
|
Pietro Corsi Misle (2) |
|
Human Resources Officer |
10,871,675-4 |
|
Renato Fernández Baeza |
|
Communications Officer |
10,673,365-1 |
|
Sebastián Fernández Cox |
|
Energy Planning Officer |
6,479,975-4 |
|
Carlos Martín Vergara |
|
General Counsel |
(1) Mr. Larumbe assumed his role as Planning and Control Officer on January 1, 2010
(2) Mr. Corsi assumed his role as Human Resources Officer on January 1, 2010
Compensation accrued by key management personnel amounts to ThCh$ 2,440,560 for the year ended December 31, 2010 (ThCh$ 2,804,285 as of December 31, 2009 and ThCh$ 2,490,689 as of December 31, 2008). This compensation includes salaries and estimated benefits, both short-term (yearly bonus) and long-term (principally staff severance indemnity).
Incentive plans for principal executives and managers
Endesa Chile has a yearly bonus plan for its executives based on their ability to accomplished objectives and their individual contribution to the companys results. This plan defines a range of bonuses based on each executives level within the companys hierarchy. Bonuses eventually given to executives consist of a certain number of monthly gross salaries.
b) Guarantees established by the Company in favor of Endesa Chile Management.
The Company has not established any guarantees in favor of Endesa Chiles Management.
c) *Guarantee clauses: in favor of Managements personnel.
*Guarantee clauses in case of dismissal or changes of control.
No guarantee clauses exist.
* Post contract non-competition clause.
No such agreements exist.
8.4 Compensation plans linked to share price.
The Company has not implemented any share-price-linked compensation plans with the Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this account is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||
Classes of Inventory |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Supplies for production |
|
42,139,761 |
|
40,179,588 |
|
Total |
|
42,139,761 |
|
40,179,588 |
|
No inventory has been pledged to guarantee debt.
10. CURRENT TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, current tax assets are as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Monthly provisional tax payments |
|
61,056,195 |
|
260,857 |
|
VAT credit |
|
18,923,704 |
|
39,172,644 |
|
Credits for training expenses |
|
77,000 |
|
84,684 |
|
Other |
|
1,151,251 |
|
4,874,113 |
|
Total |
|
81,208,150 |
|
44,392,298 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, current tax liabilities are as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Income taxes |
|
32,693,179 |
|
99,147,311 |
|
VAT debit |
|
10,000,664 |
|
15,957,390 |
|
Other |
|
10,048,348 |
|
8,840,731 |
|
Total |
|
52,742,191 |
|
123,945,432 |
|
11. INVESTMENT ACCOUNTED FOR USING EQUITY METHOD AND JOINTLY-CONTROLLED COMPANIES.
11.1 Equity method accounted investment in associates.
a) The following table details the Groups investments accounted for using the equity method and their movements during 2010 and 2009:
Movements in investments in |
|
Country of |
|
Functional |
|
Ownership |
|
Balance as of |
|
Share of Profit |
|
Dividends |
|
Foreign |
|
Other |
|
Balance as of |
|
Provision for |
|
Balance as of |
|
Electrogas S.A. (1) |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
0.0213 |
% |
3,775 |
|
1,867 |
|
(1,635 |
) |
(180 |
) |
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
3,827 |
|
Inversiones Electrogas S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
42.5000 |
% |
7,818,937 |
|
3,352,867 |
|
(3,186,199 |
) |
104,080 |
|
|
|
8,089,685 |
|
|
|
8,089,685 |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Brazil |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
40.4485 |
% |
551,904,463 |
|
90,667,296 |
|
(49,912,410 |
) |
(19,880,220 |
) |
(5,932,398 |
) |
566,846,731 |
|
|
|
566,846,731 |
|
GNL Quinteros S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
20.0000 |
% |
10,127,465 |
|
(2,542,879 |
) |
|
|
(569,596 |
) |
(4,131,356 |
) |
2,883,634 |
|
|
|
2,883,634 |
|
GNL Chile S.A. (2) |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
33.3300 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342,226 |
|
|
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
45.0000 |
% |
3,297,780 |
|
202,973 |
|
|
|
(406,675 |
) |
|
|
3,094,078 |
|
|
|
3,094,078 |
|
Distrilec Inversora S.A. (3) |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
0.8900 |
% |
944,871 |
|
(8,366 |
) |
|
|
(110,050 |
) |
(1,063 |
) |
825,392 |
|
|
|
825,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS |
|
574,097,291 |
|
91,673,758 |
|
(53,100,244 |
) |
(20,862,641 |
) |
(10,064,817 |
) |
581,743,347 |
|
1,342,226 |
|
581,743,347 |
|
Movements in investments in |
|
Country of |
|
Functional |
|
Ownership |
|
Balance as of |
|
Share of Profit |
|
Dividends |
|
Foreign |
|
Other |
|
Balance as of |
|
Provision for |
|
Balance as of |
|
Electrogas S.A. (1) |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
0.0213 |
% |
4,275 |
|
1,632 |
|
(1,291 |
) |
(841 |
) |
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
Inversiones Electrogas S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
42.5000 |
% |
9,065,667 |
|
2,871,709 |
|
(3,202,586 |
) |
(915,853 |
) |
|
|
7,818,937 |
|
|
|
7,818,937 |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Brazil |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
40.4485 |
% |
497,656,990 |
|
96,139,414 |
|
(74,292,028 |
) |
33,574,679 |
|
(1,174,592 |
) |
551,904,463 |
|
|
|
551,904,463 |
|
GNL Quinteros S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
20.0000 |
% |
24,126,683 |
|
(825,889 |
) |
|
|
(4,508,852 |
) |
(8,664,477 |
) |
10,127,465 |
|
|
|
10,127,465 |
|
GNL Chile S.A. (2) |
|
Chile |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
33.3300 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,871 |
|
|
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
45.0000 |
% |
4,592,900 |
|
186,494 |
|
|
|
(1,481,614 |
) |
|
|
3,297,780 |
|
|
|
3,297,780 |
|
Distrilec Inversora S.A. (3) |
|
Argentina |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
0.8900 |
% |
1,256,515 |
|
84,476 |
|
(33,669 |
) |
(362,451 |
) |
|
|
944,871 |
|
|
|
944,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS |
|
536,703,030 |
|
98,457,836 |
|
(77,529,574 |
) |
26,305,068 |
|
(9,839,069 |
) |
574,097,291 |
|
850,871 |
|
574,097,291 |
|
(1) The Group exercises significant influence indirectly through the 42.5% ownership interest held in Inversiones Electrogas S.A. which is the immediate parent company of Electrogas S.A. holding a 99.95% of ownership interest.
(2) The provision for negative equity is stated within other non-current non-financial liabilities.
(3) Significant influence exists because Enersis, the parent company of Endesa Chile, has a 51.5% interest in Distrilec.
b) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no changes in the interest ownership maintained in associates.
c) Additional financial information about the investments in associates
· Significant influence investments.
The following tables detail financial information as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 from the financial statements of the companies in which Endesa Chile exercises significant influence:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
Significant influence |
|
Ownership |
|
Long-term assets |
|
Current assets |
|
Long-term |
|
Current |
|
Revenue |
|
Ordinary |
|
Profit (Loss) |
|
|
|
% |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A. |
|
45.00 |
|
42,063,375 |
|
710,433 |
|
35,898,080 |
|
|
|
3,631,967 |
|
(3,180,916 |
) |
451,051 |
|
Inversiones Electrogas S.A. |
|
42.50 |
|
|
|
19,034,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,053,180 |
|
(164,082 |
) |
7,889,098 |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
40.45 |
|
799,250,363 |
|
2,469,692,998 |
|
748,074,888 |
|
1,336,786,706 |
|
1,948,848,504 |
|
(1,724,693,580 |
) |
224,154,924 |
|
Distrilec Inversora S.A. |
|
0.89 |
|
1,169,883 |
|
92,763,137 |
|
1,192,261 |
|
|
|
888,896 |
|
(1,828,882 |
) |
(939,986 |
) |
GNL Quintero S.A. |
|
20.00 |
|
43,182,432 |
|
548,261,034 |
|
15,642,419 |
|
561,382,881 |
|
46,342,847 |
|
(59,057,243 |
) |
(12,714,396 |
) |
Electrogas S.A. |
|
0.02 |
|
6,145,145 |
|
36,271,189 |
|
8,307,494 |
|
16,098,755 |
|
15,575,506 |
|
(6,788,817 |
) |
8,786,689 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||||||
Significant influence |
|
Ownership |
|
Long-term assets |
|
Current assets |
|
Long-term |
|
Current |
|
Revenue |
|
Ordinary |
|
Profit (Loss) |
|
|
|
% |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A. |
|
45.00 |
|
54,486,842 |
|
168,678 |
|
47,327,120 |
|
|
|
19,339,396 |
|
(18,924,965 |
) |
414,431 |
|
Inversiones Electrogas S.A. |
|
42.50 |
|
|
|
18,471,729 |
|
74,230 |
|
|
|
6,940,967 |
|
(184,004 |
) |
6,756,963 |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
40.45 |
|
893,078,804 |
|
2,406,346,709 |
|
577,155,133 |
|
1,141,081,701 |
|
1,711,404,371 |
|
(1,269,421,973 |
) |
441,982,398 |
|
Distrilec Inversora S.A. |
|
0.89 |
|
1,318,727 |
|
106,162,474 |
|
1,315,925 |
|
|
|
9,520,678 |
|
(28,947 |
) |
9,491,731 |
|
GNL Quintero S.A. |
|
20.00 |
|
28,098,229 |
|
562,965,213 |
|
205,586,895 |
|
334,839,224 |
|
12,893,075 |
|
(17,022,519 |
) |
(4,129,444 |
) |
Electrogas S.A. |
|
0.02 |
|
5,606,476 |
|
41,393,766 |
|
8,210,466 |
|
21,027,132 |
|
13,510,320 |
|
(5,830,170 |
) |
7,680,150 |
|
The associates shares are not listed or sold through public exchanges.
The accompanying Appendix No. 3 to these notes to the consolidated financial statements further describes the business activities of the associates, as well as the ownership percentages.
· Additional Information
Companhia De Interconexão Energética CIEN
Upon inception, the line of business of Companhia De Interconexão Energética (CIEN), a subsidiary of our associate Endesa Brasil, was to sell electric power in Argentina and Brazil; however, due to the reduction in the generation limit and the physical guarantee over energy and associated power, the Company is refocusing its business on a payment structure not based on the purchase and sale of energy between countries. Considering the strategic significance of the Companys assets for the relationship between Brazil and Argentina, the Company has prepared along with the Brazilian Government a new business plan that has changed the Companys activity from energy sale to energy transmission for the payment of a fixed salary. This plan is in the formalization process and requires the integration of the Companys transmission lines with those operated by the Brazilian Government.
It is important to note that in prior years the Governments of Argentina and Uruguay formalized with the Company the payment of tolls for the transportation of energy between both countries. Management considers that this situation strengthen the importance of the request made by the Brazilian Government in relation to the approval of the new business plan, and considers this approval likely to occur. In addition, on June 4, 2010, the Company signed a new seven-month contract for a total amount of US$ 155 million for the transport of energy required by the Argentine Government.
Based on its studies of the different business alternatives, the Company considers it will have no problems to recover all its net assets. CIENs new business model is expected to start operating during 2011.
Cachoeira Dourada S.A.
Cachoeira, a subsidiary of our associate Endesa Brasil, maintains balances receivable of ThCh$ 40,268,000 from Compañía de Electricidad de Goiás (CELG). CELG, a state-owned company of the Brazilian state of Goiás, has recognized the indebted balance and is searching for the best financial alternative to obtain resources to pay its debts. The Group expects a favorable outcome in this negotiation and also expects to recover at least the recorded amount.
d) Restrictions on the disposal of associates funds
Endesa Brasil has to comply with some financial covenants which require maintaining a minimum level of equity that restrict the ability to transfer assets. The Companys share of restricted net assets at December 31, 2010 pertaining to Endesa Brasil amounts to ThCh$ 198,672,146.
11.2 Jointly-controlled companies.
The following tables detail financial information as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 from the financial statements of the jointly-controlled companies in which Endesa Chile participates that have been used in the consolidation process (proportionally):
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Ownership |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Revenue |
|
Ordinary |
|
Profit |
|
|
|
% |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
51.00 |
% |
7,609,649 |
|
99,469,947 |
|
7,655,622 |
|
642,418 |
|
|
|
(7,186,862 |
) |
(7,186,862 |
) |
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. |
|
50.00 |
% |
3,226,372 |
|
9,502,126 |
|
1,730,150 |
|
943,702 |
|
2,122,132 |
|
(1,196,978 |
) |
925,154 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
50.00 |
% |
111,484,190 |
|
291,968,048 |
|
138,310,532 |
|
43,440,220 |
|
334,321,296 |
|
(294,331,806 |
) |
39,989,490 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Ownership |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Revenue |
|
Ordinary |
|
Profit |
|
|
|
% |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
51.00 |
% |
8,111,503 |
|
86,908,393 |
|
37,110,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,994,070 |
) |
(5,994,070 |
) |
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. |
|
50.00 |
% |
1,288,870 |
|
10,198,482 |
|
1,480,132 |
|
876,728 |
|
2,327,365 |
|
(1,207,963 |
) |
1,119,402 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
50.00 |
% |
114,435,232 |
|
316,349,774 |
|
187,877,000 |
|
42,467,600 |
|
343,304,368 |
|
(319,108,438 |
) |
24,195,930 |
|
12. INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL.
The following tables detail the balances within this account as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Intangible Assets, Net |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
44,354,510 |
|
42,638,575 |
|
Development costs |
|
2,262,982 |
|
1,653,601 |
|
Easements |
|
4,321,031 |
|
2,695,227 |
|
Water Rights |
|
13,694,355 |
|
13,881,704 |
|
Concessions |
|
14,200,420 |
|
16,641,396 |
|
Patents, Registered Trademarks and other Rights |
|
23,121 |
|
539,285 |
|
Computer Software |
|
5,390,313 |
|
5,915,295 |
|
Other Identifiable Intangible Assets |
|
4,462,288 |
|
1,312,067 |
|
Gross Intangible Assets |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, gross |
|
86,429,809 |
|
80,874,347 |
|
Development costs |
|
3,875,653 |
|
1,666,793 |
|
Easements |
|
5,025,612 |
|
3,256,459 |
|
Water Rights |
|
17,212,199 |
|
16,822,082 |
|
Concessions |
|
39,461,837 |
|
39,246,752 |
|
Patents, Registered Trademarks and other Rights |
|
25,123 |
|
2,236,939 |
|
Computer Software |
|
13,419,449 |
|
13,569,658 |
|
Other Identifiable Intangible Assets |
|
7,409,936 |
|
4,075,664 |
|
Accumulated Amortization and Impairment |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Total Accumulated Amortization and Impairment |
|
(42,075,299 |
) |
(38,235,772 |
) |
Development costs |
|
(1,612,671 |
) |
(13,192 |
) |
Easements |
|
(704,581 |
) |
(561,232 |
) |
Water Rights |
|
(3,517,844 |
) |
(2,940,378 |
) |
Concessions |
|
(25,261,417 |
) |
(22,605,356 |
) |
Patents, Registered Trademarks and other Rights |
|
(2,002 |
) |
(1,697,654 |
) |
Computer Software |
|
(8,029,136 |
) |
(7,654,363 |
) |
Other Identifiable Intangible Assets |
|
(2,947,648 |
) |
(2,763,597 |
) |
Intangible assets have experienced the following movements during the 2010 and 2009 periods:
2010
Movements in Intangible Assets |
|
Development |
|
Easements |
|
Water rights |
|
Concessions |
|
Patents, |
|
Computer |
|
Other |
|
Intangible Assets, |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Beginning Balance as of 12/31/2009 |
|
1,653,601 |
|
2,695,227 |
|
13,881,704 |
|
16,641,396 |
|
539,285 |
|
5,915,295 |
|
1,312,067 |
|
42,638,575 |
|
Additions |
|
854,638 |
|
479,691 |
|
378,822 |
|
215,084 |
|
|
|
481,399 |
|
3,201,965 |
|
5,611,599 |
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,313 |
) |
|
|
(3,313 |
) |
Amortization (*) |
|
(1,322 |
) |
(722 |
) |
(349,391 |
) |
(2,656,624 |
) |
|
|
(818,506 |
) |
(113,431 |
) |
(3,939,996 |
) |
Exchange differences increase (decrease) |
|
(243,935 |
) |
20 |
|
(388,157 |
) |
563 |
|
(1,932 |
) |
(10,070 |
) |
254 |
|
(643,257 |
) |
Other increases (decreases) |
|
|
|
1,146,815 |
|
171,377 |
|
1 |
|
(514,232 |
) |
(174,492 |
) |
61,433 |
|
690,902 |
|
Total movements in identifiable intangible assets |
|
609,381 |
|
1,625,804 |
|
(187,349 |
) |
(2,440,976 |
) |
(516,164 |
) |
(524,982 |
) |
3,150,221 |
|
1,715,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance Identifiable Intangible Assets as of 12/31/2010 |
|
2,262,982 |
|
4,321,031 |
|
13,694,355 |
|
14,200,420 |
|
23,121 |
|
5,390,313 |
|
4,462,288 |
|
44,354,510 |
|
(*) See Note 26 Depreciation and Amortization.
2009
Movements in Intangible Assets |
|
Development |
|
Easements |
|
Water rights |
|
Concessions |
|
Patents, |
|
Computer |
|
Other |
|
Intangible Assets, |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Beginning Balance as of 12/31/2008 |
|
17,123 |
|
1,420,607 |
|
10,452,421 |
|
18,751,630 |
|
5,310,438 |
|
1,546,953 |
|
866,830 |
|
38,366,002 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
922,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
411,575 |
|
104,405 |
|
125,972 |
|
1,564,019 |
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(17,512 |
) |
Amortization |
|
(1,333 |
) |
(557 |
) |
(346,002 |
) |
(2,110,244 |
) |
(226,916 |
) |
(448,816 |
) |
(235,467 |
) |
(3,369,335 |
) |
Exchange differences increase (decrease) |
|
(3,461 |
) |
(96 |
) |
(1,513,556 |
) |
|
|
(907,664 |
) |
(13,909 |
) |
(66,084 |
) |
(2,504,770 |
) |
Other increases (decreases) |
|
1,641,272 |
|
353,206 |
|
5,288,841 |
|
10 |
|
(4,030,636 |
) |
4,726,662 |
|
620,816 |
|
8,600,171 |
|
Total movements in identifiable intangible assets |
|
1,636,478 |
|
1,274,620 |
|
3,429,283 |
|
(2,110,234 |
) |
(4,771,153 |
) |
4,368,342 |
|
445,237 |
|
4,272,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance Identifiable Intangible Assets as of 12/31/2009 |
|
1,653,601 |
|
2,695,227 |
|
13,881,704 |
|
16,641,396 |
|
539,285 |
|
5,915,295 |
|
1,312,067 |
|
42,638,575 |
|
Based on estimates and projections available to the Groups Management, projections of cash flows attributable to intangible assets allow the net value of these assets recorded as of December 31, 2010 to be recovered (see Note 3d). As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company does not have any significate intangible assets.
The following table details goodwill that has been allocated to the different Cash Generating Units or groups of Cash Generating Units and its movements during 2010 and 2009:
Company |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Additions |
|
Foreign |
|
Final Balance |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
3,139,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,139,337 |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
3,290,092 |
|
|
|
(386,875 |
) |
2,903,217 |
|
Southern Cone Power Argentina S.A. |
|
2,733,491 |
|
|
|
(321,426 |
) |
2,412,065 |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
14,176,409 |
|
|
|
(1,666,976 |
) |
12,509,433 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
1,516,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,516,768 |
|
Edegel S.A. |
|
75,920,260 |
|
|
|
(2,989,192 |
) |
72,931,068 |
|
Emgesa S.A. |
|
4,755,333 |
|
|
|
(94,551 |
) |
4,660,782 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
12,636 |
|
Total |
|
105,545,382 |
|
|
|
(5,460,076 |
) |
100,085,306 |
|
Company |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Additions |
|
Foreign |
|
Final Balance |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
3,139,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,139,337 |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
4,556,780 |
|
|
|
(1,266,688 |
) |
3,290,092 |
|
Southern Cone Power Argentina S.A. |
|
3,779,030 |
|
|
|
(1,045,539 |
) |
2,733,491 |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
19,586,941 |
|
|
|
(5,410,532 |
) |
14,176,409 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
1,516,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,516,768 |
|
Edegel S.A. (1) |
|
553,603 |
|
81,370,212 |
|
(6,003,555 |
) |
75,920,260 |
|
Emgesa S.A. |
|
5,437,195 |
|
|
|
(681,862 |
) |
4,755,333 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
18,756 |
|
|
|
(5,064 |
) |
13,692 |
|
Total |
|
38,588,410 |
|
81,370,212 |
|
(14,413,240 |
) |
105,545,382 |
|
Based on estimates and projections available to Endesa Chiles Management, projections of cash flows attributable to Cash Generating Units or groups of Cash Generating Units to which goodwill has been allocated support the recoverability of amounts recorded as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (see Note 3.d).
(1) The addition in Edegel originated from an acquisition which took place in October 2009, as further described in Note 22.6.a). Previously, Edegel has been already been consolidated.
14. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT.
a) The following tables detail the balances within this account as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
4,253,906,589 |
|
4,326,989,360 |
|
Construction in Progress |
|
608,596,323 |
|
536,448,556 |
|
Land |
|
78,877,683 |
|
60,524,427 |
|
Buildings |
|
434,119,630 |
|
469,701,385 |
|
Plant and Equipment |
|
3,069,395,911 |
|
3,204,840,870 |
|
IT Equipment |
|
2,415,894 |
|
2,644,074 |
|
Fixtures and Fittings |
|
2,985,401 |
|
6,763,919 |
|
Motor Vehicles |
|
998,995 |
|
813,545 |
|
Other |
|
56,516,752 |
|
45,252,584 |
|
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
7,214,012,699 |
|
7,180,903,160 |
|
Construction in Progress |
|
608,596,323 |
|
536,448,556 |
|
Land |
|
78,877,683 |
|
60,524,427 |
|
Buildings |
|
603,016,963 |
|
636,044,699 |
|
Plant and Equipment |
|
5,822,980,365 |
|
5,856,864,944 |
|
IT Equipment |
|
12,315,903 |
|
12,121,154 |
|
Fixtures and Fittings |
|
19,289,187 |
|
18,887,548 |
|
Motor Vehicles |
|
3,493,227 |
|
3,370,794 |
|
Other |
|
65,443,048 |
|
56,641,038 |
|
Classes of Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment, Property, Plant |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment, Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
(2,960,106,110 |
) |
(2,853,913,800 |
) |
Buildings |
|
(168,897,333 |
) |
(166,343,314 |
) |
Plant and Equipment |
|
(2,753,584,454 |
) |
(2,652,024,074 |
) |
IT Equipment |
|
(9,900,009 |
) |
(9,477,080 |
) |
Fixtures and Fittings |
|
(16,303,786 |
) |
(12,123,629 |
) |
Motor Vehicles |
|
(2,494,232 |
) |
(2,557,249 |
) |
Other |
|
(8,926,296 |
) |
(11,388,454 |
) |
b) Property, Plant and Equipment during 2010 and 2009 is detailed as follows:
Movement 2010 |
|
Construction in |
|
Land |
|
Buildings, Net |
|
Plant and |
|
IT Equipment, |
|
Fixtures and |
|
Motor Vehicles, |
|
Other Property, |
|
Property, Plant |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
536,448,556 |
|
60,524,427 |
|
469,701,385 |
|
3,204,840,870 |
|
2,644,074 |
|
6,763,919 |
|
813,545 |
|
45,252,584 |
|
4,326,989,360 |
|
Additions |
|
181,369,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,369,666 |
|
Retirements |
|
(56,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(124,642 |
) |
(659 |
) |
(270 |
) |
(6,727 |
) |
(7,538 |
) |
(196,687 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(14,841,057 |
) |
(156,596,319 |
) |
(924,609 |
) |
(1,176,493 |
) |
(277,595 |
) |
(1,251,831 |
) |
(175,067,904 |
) |
Impairment losses recorded on earnings (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397,857 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
(3,456,617 |
) |
(861,803 |
) |
(24,307,921 |
) |
(50,250,877 |
) |
(68,970 |
) |
(539,579 |
) |
(21,615 |
) |
(1,865,613 |
) |
(81,372,995 |
) |
Other increases (decreases) |
|
(105,708,431 |
) |
19,215,059 |
|
3,567,223 |
|
71,924,736 |
|
766,058 |
|
(2,062,176 |
) |
491,387 |
|
14,389,150 |
|
2,583,006 |
|
Total movements |
|
72,147,767 |
|
18,353,256 |
|
(35,581,755 |
) |
(135,444,959 |
) |
(228,180 |
) |
(3,778,518 |
) |
185,450 |
|
11,264,168 |
|
(73,082,771 |
) |
Ending balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
608,596,323 |
|
78,877,683 |
|
434,119,630 |
|
3,069,395,911 |
|
2,415,894 |
|
2,985,401 |
|
998,995 |
|
56,516,752 |
|
4,253,906,589 |
|
Movement 2009 |
|
Construction in |
|
Land |
|
Buildings, Net |
|
Plant and |
|
IT Equipment, |
|
Fixtures and |
|
Motor Vehicles, |
|
Other Property, |
|
Property, Plant |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
462,213,152 |
|
56,987,967 |
|
557,198,261 |
|
3,397,049,290 |
|
3,606,127 |
|
7,853,672 |
|
1,212,948 |
|
54,773,201 |
|
4,540,894,618 |
|
Additions |
|
388,555,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,555,957 |
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
(4,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9,967 |
) |
|
|
(54,916 |
) |
|
|
(69,522 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(14,471,283 |
) |
(174,260,775 |
) |
(1,166,463 |
) |
(871,015 |
) |
(328,701 |
) |
(1,674,503 |
) |
(192,772,740 |
) |
Impairment losses recorded on earnings (*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,999,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,999,600 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
(8,328,806 |
) |
(3,731,792 |
) |
(82,185,495 |
) |
(261,704,168 |
) |
(281,061 |
) |
(760,511 |
) |
(137,722 |
) |
(6,969,535 |
) |
(364,099,090 |
) |
Other increases (decreases) |
|
(305,991,747 |
) |
7,272,891 |
|
9,159,902 |
|
287,756,123 |
|
495,438 |
|
541,773 |
|
121,936 |
|
(876,579 |
) |
(1,520,263 |
) |
Total movements |
|
74,235,404 |
|
3,536,460 |
|
(87,496,876 |
) |
(192,208,420 |
) |
(962,053 |
) |
(1,089,753 |
) |
(399,403 |
) |
(9,520,617 |
) |
(213,905,258 |
) |
Ending balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
536,448,556 |
|
60,524,427 |
|
469,701,385 |
|
3,204,840,870 |
|
2,644,074 |
|
6,763,919 |
|
813,545 |
|
45,252,584 |
|
4,326,989,360 |
|
(*) See Note 26: Depreciation, amortization and impairment.
Material investments in the electricity generation business include developments in the program to create new capacity.
In Chile, the construction of the Bocamina II Coal-fired Thermal Plant with capacity of 370 MW stands out among other projects. The project Central Térmica Quintero, consisting primarily of an open-cycle plant will operate similarly as GNL with a diesel fuel plant with capacity of 257 MW. Such project has been completed and put into operation in September 2009. The Canela II Wind Farm Expansion project with 40 wind generators with 60 MW capacity, has been completed and started in operation in December 2009, reinforcing Endesa Chiles commitment to the environment by developing non-conventional renewable energies (NCREs).
In Colombia, the El Quimbo Hydraulic Plant is being built. This plant will have a reservoir with 400 MW of installed capacity and an annual average generation of approximately 2,216 GWh.
In Peru, the Santa Rosa Open Cycle Thermal Power Plant, with a capacity of 189 MW. This plant will operate using natural gas from Camisea. This project was completed and put in operation in September 2009.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, tangible assets amount to ThCh$ 122,739,956 and ThCh$ 132,693,768, respectively, which are the net book values of the assets under finance leases.
The present values of future payments on finance lease arrangements are detailed below:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Interest |
|
Present |
|
Gross |
|
Interest |
|
Present |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year |
|
10,627,559 |
|
2,055,762 |
|
8,571,797 |
|
12,798,056 |
|
3,166,125 |
|
9,631,931 |
|
Between 1 and 5 years |
|
37,541,245 |
|
8,851,781 |
|
28,689,464 |
|
54,192,355 |
|
12,146,544 |
|
50,048,302 |
|
More than 5 years |
|
32,304,929 |
|
3,209,115 |
|
29,095,814 |
|
48,383,017 |
|
7,089,994 |
|
41,293,023 |
|
Total |
|
80,473,733 |
|
14,116,658 |
|
66,357,075 |
|
115,373,428 |
|
22,402,663 |
|
92,970,765 |
|
Assets under financing leases are mostly comprised of the following:
1. Endesa Chile S.A.: Corresponds to a contract for building an electric transmission line (Ralco-Charrúa 2X220 KV), entered into by the Company and Abengoa Chile S.A. Such contract has a 20-year duration and bears interest at an annual rate of 6.5%.
2. Edegel S.A.: Corresponds to contracts for financing the project of converting the Etevensa thermal plant from open-cycle to combined-cycle. Such financing has been entered into by the subsidiary, Instituciones Financieras Banco de Crédito del Perú and BBVA - Banco Continental. Such contracts have an 8-years duration and bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.0% and LIBOR plus 3.0%, respectively, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Future payments on operating lease arrangements as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are detailed below:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Less than one year |
|
1,450,228 |
|
1,488,717 |
|
1,854,326 |
|
Between 1 and 5 years |
|
5,800,911 |
|
6,315,471 |
|
6,020,093 |
|
More than 5 years |
|
7,251,139 |
|
7,170,252 |
|
6,983,257 |
|
Total |
|
14,502,277 |
|
14,974,440 |
|
14,857,676 |
|
1. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Endesa Chile and subsidiaries maintain commitments to acquire tangible assets totaling ThCh$ 64,771,839 and ThCh$ 221,189,921, respectively.
2. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Groups fixed assets pledged to guarantee liabilities amounts to ThCh$ 150,728,873 and ThCh$ 261,444,289, respectively (see Note 31).
3. The Company and its Chilean and foreign subsidiaries have contracted an all-risk, earthquake and equipment breakdown insurance policy with a limit of ThUS$ 300,000, including coverage for business interruption damages. The premiums for this policy are recorded proportionally by each company within prepaid expenses.
4. GasAtacama, in which Endesa Chile has a 50% interest consolidated using the proportional integration method, has, among other assets, a combined-cycle electricity generation plant in northern Chile. As importing natural gas from neighboring countries was not possible, GasAtacama has been forced to generate electricity using alternative fuels, the cost of which significantly increased during the final months of 2007 due to increases in oil prices. As a result, the company filed lawsuits for early termination of a contract with distributor Emel. On January 25, 2008, a ruling on this matter was issued in arbitration proceedings to deny early termination. This situation significantly reduced the recoverable value of the aforementioned plant and, therefore, as of December 31, 2007, an impairment provision of US$ 110 million was recorded for this investment.
5. The current situation regarding long-lived assets, mostly plants and infrastructure constructed with the purpose of providing energy resources for the SIC system from year 1998, has changed, principally due to the installation of new thermal plants in the SIC, the arrival of GNL, and the estimated development of new projects. This situation has created an environment of excess supply for future years resulting in the expectation that some of these assets will not be used. Accordingly, at December 31, 2009 the Company has recorded an impairment provision for these assets for ThCh$ 43,999,600.
6. As a consequence of the earthquake that occurred in Chile on February 27, 2010, certain of the Companys facilities and equipment were totally or partially damaged. The impact on the assets is not significant and only the Bocamina and Bocamina II (under construction) plants suffered damages in their infrastructure.
As a result of the above, fixed assets in the amount of ThCh$ 369,643 were retired. In addition, the Company made expenses in relation to repairs and investments in assets for an amount of ThCh$ 9,733,426 in relation to the Bocamina plant mainly. All the disbursements made are covered by insurance policies in which the deductible is US$ 2,5 million.
It is important to note that Endesa Chile and subsidiaries have the insurance policies required to cover this type of exceptional events. Such policies cover material damages as well as business interruptions. See Note 23.
a) The origin of the deferred taxes recorded as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are detailed as follows:
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
| ||||
Temporary Difference |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Depreciation |
|
50,289,811 |
|
55,005,317 |
|
310,395,721 |
|
314,023,981 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
7,775,689 |
|
6,873,797 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Accruals |
|
327,445 |
|
595,379 |
|
10,307,059 |
|
15,800,898 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Provisions |
|
22,495,049 |
|
13,842,035 |
|
4,138,930 |
|
63,521 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating Employment Benefit Obligations |
|
599,205 |
|
32,238 |
|
304,601 |
|
805,392 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Revaluations of Financial Instruments |
|
262,938 |
|
116,452 |
|
3,713,378 |
|
293,219 |
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Tax Losses |
|
20,955,842 |
|
14,874,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes Relating to Others |
|
1,183,393 |
|
10,458,342 |
|
10,374,461 |
|
10,015,811 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
|
96,113,683 |
|
94,924,126 |
|
347,009,839 |
|
347,876,619 |
|
b) The following table details the movements of Deferred tax accounts within the consolidated statement of financial position during 2010 and 2009:
Deferred tax movements |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
110,326,384 |
|
399,374,385 |
|
Increase (decrease) in Profit and Loss |
|
(672,698 |
) |
(22,160,048 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in Comprehensive Income |
|
(2,219,677 |
) |
133,193 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
(12,509,883 |
) |
(29,470,911 |
) |
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
94,924,126 |
|
347,876,619 |
|
Increase (decrease) in Profit and Loss |
|
4,220,797 |
|
4,668,087 |
|
Increase (decrease) in Comprehensive Income |
|
(407,403 |
) |
2,783,820 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
(2,623,837 |
) |
(8,318,687 |
) |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
96,113,683 |
|
347,009,839 |
|
Recovery of deferred tax assets will depend on whether sufficient tax profits are obtained in the future. The Company believes that the future profit projections for its numerous subsidiaries will allow these assets to be recovered.
c) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Group has not recognized deferred tax assets related to tax losses of ThCh$ 2,095,930 and ThCh$ 4,191,442, respectively. See Note 3.m.
Endesa Chile has not recorded deferred tax liabilities related to undistributed net income from subsidiaries, associates and jointly-controlled companies in which the position of control that it exercises over these companies enables it to manage their reversal and it is likely that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2010, the total amount of this unrecorded temporary difference amounted to ThCh$ 245,560,467.
The Group may be subject to income tax audits by tax authorities in their respective countries. These audits are limited to a certain number of tax years and once this period has lapsed, such inspections
generally expire. Tax audits, by nature, are often complex and may extend over several years. The following table summarizes the tax periods that are potentially subject to audit:
Country |
|
Period |
|
Chile |
|
2007-2010 |
|
Argentina |
|
2006-2010 |
|
Colombia |
|
2008-2010 |
|
Peru |
|
2007-2010 |
|
Given the range of possible interpretations of tax standards, the results of any future inspections carried out by tax authorities for the years subject to audit can give rise to tax liabilities that cannot currently be quantified. Nevertheless, Endesa Chiles Management estimates that the liabilities, if any, that may arise from such audits, would not significantly impact the companies future results.
The effect of deferred taxes of components of other comprehensive income for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, are as follows:
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
| ||||||||||||
Deferred tax effects of components |
|
Amounts |
|
Income tax |
|
Amounts |
|
Amounts |
|
Income tax |
|
Amounts |
|
Amounts |
|
Income tax |
|
Amounts |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial assets |
|
(840 |
) |
143 |
|
(697 |
) |
55,354 |
|
(9,563 |
) |
45,791 |
|
(55 |
) |
9 |
|
(46 |
) |
Cash flow hedge |
|
39,403,869 |
|
(7,544,962 |
) |
31,858,907 |
|
215,731,150 |
|
(37,339,636 |
) |
178,391,514 |
|
(333,277,609 |
) |
58,245,740 |
|
(275,031,869 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
(71,162,059 |
) |
|
|
(71,162,059 |
) |
(226,884,446 |
) |
|
|
(226,884,446 |
) |
156,276,385 |
|
|
|
156,276,385 |
|
Actuarial income on defined benefit pension plans |
|
(938,426 |
) |
210,906 |
|
(727,520 |
) |
(1,425,917 |
) |
754,710 |
|
(671,207 |
) |
(1,770,360 |
) |
218,879 |
|
(1,551,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(32,697,456 |
) |
(7,333,913 |
) |
(40,031,369 |
) |
(12,523,859 |
) |
(36,594,489 |
) |
(49,118,348 |
) |
(178,771,639 |
) |
58,464,628 |
|
(120,307,011 |
) |
16. OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this caption is comprised of the following:
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
| ||||
Other financial liabilities |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Loans |
|
249,185,637 |
|
1,523,141,821 |
|
345,355,943 |
|
1,791,980,967 |
|
Headge derivative instruments (*) |
|
908,928 |
|
4,487,602 |
|
717,980 |
|
2,929,730 |
|
Non-hedge derivatives instruments (**) |
|
|
|
|
|
420,822 |
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
2,614,129 |
|
11,020,674 |
|
2,054,040 |
|
12,788,275 |
|
Total |
|
252,708,694 |
|
1,538,650,097 |
|
348,548,785 |
|
1,807,698,972 |
|
(*) See Note 18.2a
(**) See Note 18.2b
Interest-Bearing Loans
1. The short and long-term detail of this account as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
| ||||
Classes of Interest-Bearing Loans |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Loans |
|
249,185,637 |
|
1,523,141,821 |
|
345,355,943 |
|
1,791,980,967 |
|
Bank loans |
|
91,786,851 |
|
238,314,148 |
|
222,518,093 |
|
366,393,195 |
|
Unsecured debentures |
|
110,611,465 |
|
1,145,282,214 |
|
72,450,230 |
|
1,239,971,152 |
|
Secured debentures |
|
9,522,288 |
|
17,703,710 |
|
11,023,415 |
|
28,559,670 |
|
Capital leases |
|
8,571,797 |
|
57,785,278 |
|
9,631,931 |
|
83,338,834 |
|
Other loans |
|
28,693,236 |
|
64,056,471 |
|
29,732,274 |
|
73,718,116 |
|
Total |
|
249,185,637 |
|
1,523,141,821 |
|
345,355,943 |
|
1,791,980,967 |
|
2. The following table details bank loans by currency and by maturity as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
· Summary of bank loans per currency and maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to Three |
|
Three to |
|
Total Current |
|
One to Three |
|
Three to Five |
|
Five Years or |
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
2.75 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
381,532 |
|
18,915,156 |
|
19,296,688 |
|
2,871,499 |
|
95,144,820 |
|
|
|
98,016,319 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Quarterly |
|
2.95 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
999,046 |
|
16,410,407 |
|
17,409,453 |
|
11,694,152 |
|
6,908,207 |
|
21,661,326 |
|
40,263,685 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Quarterly |
|
4.50 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
29,485 |
|
|
|
29,485 |
|
6,235,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,235,814 |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
5.24 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
5,085,358 |
|
17,057,145 |
|
22,142,503 |
|
4,013,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,013,854 |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
Biannual |
|
16.76 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
14,760,009 |
|
13,106,831 |
|
27,866,840 |
|
15,582,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,582,774 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
Biannual |
|
6.91 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
5,041,882 |
|
5,041,882 |
|
|
|
74,201,702 |
|
|
|
74,201,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
21,255,430 |
|
70,531,421 |
|
91,786,851 |
|
40,398,093 |
|
176,254,729 |
|
21,661,326 |
|
238,314,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
Total Non- |
| ||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Current as |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Ten Years |
|
Current as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
2.22 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
370,984 |
|
163,384,485 |
|
163,755,469 |
|
104,732,133 |
|
103,684,532 |
|
829,651 |
|
209,246,316 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Quarterly |
|
5.12 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
11,446,321 |
|
6,188,337 |
|
17,634,658 |
|
13,297,208 |
|
11,561,913 |
|
|
|
24,859,121 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Quarterly |
|
4.37 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
87,177 |
|
|
|
87,177 |
|
19,540,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,540,273 |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
8.70 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
8,324,583 |
|
13,621,109 |
|
21,945,692 |
|
36,113,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,113,536 |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
Biannual |
|
11.52 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
3,963,387 |
|
5,538,868 |
|
9,502,255 |
|
972,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
972,164 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
Biannual |
|
12.93 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
9,592,842 |
|
9,592,842 |
|
|
|
75,661,785 |
|
|
|
75,661,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
24,192,452 |
|
198,325,641 |
|
222,518,093 |
|
174,655,314 |
|
190,908,230 |
|
829,651 |
|
366,393,195 |
|
The fair value of current and non-current bank loans amounts to ThCh$ 388,248,122 and ThCh$ 661,136,716 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
· Bank loans per lender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
Nominal |
|
Frequency |
|
Current |
| ||||
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
ID of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
Interest |
|
interest |
|
of |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
Number |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
rate |
|
payment |
|
90 days |
|
90 days |
|
current |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.60% |
|
4.52% |
|
Term |
|
27,549 |
|
|
|
27,549 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
3.21% |
|
3.21% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
3,524,902 |
|
3,524,902 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
3.52% |
|
3.52% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
6,579,812 |
|
6,579,812 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
4.12% |
|
4.12% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
3.80% |
|
3.75% |
|
Term |
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco De Credito |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
5.70% |
|
5.70% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco De Credito |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
L3M+2.5% |
|
L3M+2.5% |
|
Quarterly |
|
583,558 |
|
1,686,071 |
|
2,269,629 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
L3M+3% |
|
L3M+3% |
|
Quarterly |
|
415,488 |
|
1,246,464 |
|
1,661,952 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
L6M+1.25% |
|
L6M+1.25% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
|
|
3,373,158 |
|
3,373,158 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.28% |
|
4.21% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.40% |
|
4.33% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.30% |
|
4.23% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Davivienda |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
521,504 |
|
521,504 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bancolombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
373,568 |
|
373,568 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bancolombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
1,230,198 |
|
1,230,198 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
BBVA Colombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
1,363,850 |
|
1,363,850 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Santander |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
|
|
1,552,762 |
|
1,552,762 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Santander Río |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
4.67% |
|
4.67% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
5.86% |
|
5.86% |
|
Term |
|
602,549 |
|
|
|
602,549 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Galicia |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
LIBOR+3% |
|
LIBOR+3% |
|
Term |
|
713,260 |
|
|
|
713,260 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Ciudad |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
5.70% |
|
5.70% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Credit Suisse International |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
LIBOR+12% |
|
LIBOR+12% |
|
Term |
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
6,596 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
LIBOR+4.8% |
|
LIBOR+4.8% |
|
Term |
|
614,327 |
|
|
|
614,327 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Nación Argentina |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BAIBOR+5% |
|
BAIBOR+5% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
1,815,068 |
|
1,815,068 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Mediocredito Italiano |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
1.75% |
|
1.75% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
963,655 |
|
963,655 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Santander Río |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
16.07% |
|
16.07% |
|
Term |
|
882,153 |
|
|
|
882,153 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Comafi |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.00% |
|
15.00% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Itau |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BAIBOR+5% |
|
BAIBOR+5% |
|
Term |
|
2,679,318 |
|
|
|
2,679,318 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
13.80% |
|
13.80% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
3,705,866 |
|
3,705,866 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Galicia |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.50% |
|
15.50% |
|
Term |
|
1,778,439 |
|
|
|
1,778,439 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
5.32% |
|
5.32% |
|
Term |
|
381,952 |
|
|
|
381,952 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Galicia |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
6.39% |
|
6.39% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
277,010 |
|
277,010 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Supervielle |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
13.80% |
|
13.80% |
|
Term |
|
1,779,852 |
|
|
|
1,779,852 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Ciudad |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.80% |
|
15.80% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
954,115 |
|
954,115 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Standard |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.14% |
|
17.14% |
|
Term |
|
1,159,754 |
|
|
|
1,159,754 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Macro |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
16.00% |
|
16.00% |
|
Term |
|
357,808 |
|
|
|
357,808 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
B.N.P. Paribas |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
6.32% |
|
5.98% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
|
|
821,662 |
|
821,662 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Export Development Corpotation Loan |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+1,0 |
|
Libor+1,0 |
|
Bi-annual |
|
356,896 |
|
335,088 |
|
691,984 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
24,636 |
|
|
|
24,636 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Caja Madrid, Caja Madrid Miami Agency |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Santander Central Hispano S.A. N.Y.B. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Citibank NA ,Nassau, Bahamas Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Ing Bank N.V. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
San Paolo IMI S.p.A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
HSBC Bank pic Spanish Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
ABN AMRO Bank |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Instituto de Credito Oficial |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Export Development Corpotation Loan |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
B.N.P. Paribas Panama Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Español de crédito S.A. N.Y.B. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,030,000-7 |
|
Banco Estado |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Libor+0,300 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Libor+0,750 |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Deutsche Bank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
3.80% |
|
Libor+3.5% |
|
Term |
|
1,383,337 |
|
8,390,068 |
|
9,773,405 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Standard Bank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
3.80% |
|
Libor+3.5% |
|
Term |
|
1,383,337 |
|
8,390,068 |
|
9,773,405 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Itau - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
22,071 |
|
1,095,330 |
|
1,117,401 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Standard - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
22,071 |
|
1,095,330 |
|
1,117,401 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Santander - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
23,732 |
|
1,177,774 |
|
1,201,506 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Hipotecario - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
19,936 |
|
989,330 |
|
1,009,266 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Galicia - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
9,493 |
|
471,110 |
|
480,603 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Itau - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
8,307 |
|
412,221 |
|
420,528 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Santander - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
BPC + 5.75% |
|
Term |
|
8,307 |
|
412,221 |
|
420,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
4,901,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,901,950 |
|
19,996 |
|
|
|
19,996 |
|
5,156,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,156,948 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,028,759 |
|
|
|
1,028,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,962 |
|
1,014,199 |
|
1,030,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,890 |
|
1,471,230 |
|
1,499,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
1,333,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333,864 |
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
1,403,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,403,251 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,072,753 |
|
|
|
5,072,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
8,430,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,430,354 |
|
3,681,430 |
|
|
|
3,681,430 |
|
|
|
10,690,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,690,495 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,577,727 |
|
6,908,207 |
|
21,661,326 |
|
|
|
30,147,260 |
|
1,619,527 |
|
|
|
1,619,527 |
|
7,820,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,820,494 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,686,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686,071 |
|
|
|
3,652,838 |
|
3,652,838 |
|
5,476,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,476,714 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,155 |
|
|
|
13,155 |
|
2,631,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,631,096 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,609 |
|
|
|
25,609 |
|
5,262,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,262,192 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,189 |
|
|
|
27,189 |
|
5,086,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086,786 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
7,675,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,675,010 |
|
|
|
992,230 |
|
992,230 |
|
|
|
7,826,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,826,033 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
5,497,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,497,818 |
|
|
|
710,761 |
|
710,761 |
|
|
|
5,606,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,606,000 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
18,104,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,104,904 |
|
|
|
2,340,613 |
|
2,340,613 |
|
|
|
18,461,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,461,158 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
20,071,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,071,871 |
|
|
|
2,594,904 |
|
2,594,904 |
|
|
|
20,466,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,466,830 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
22,852,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,852,099 |
|
|
|
2,954,334 |
|
2,954,334 |
|
|
|
23,301,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,301,764 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706,604 |
|
|
|
706,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685,119 |
|
|
|
685,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,930 |
|
|
|
385,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034,484 |
|
|
|
1,034,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
4,013,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,013,854 |
|
2,176,661 |
|
|
|
2,176,661 |
|
2,173,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173,458 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,548 |
|
407,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
2,077,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077,593 |
|
686,987 |
|
2,668,948 |
|
3,355,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,951,134 |
|
1,951,134 |
|
972,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
972,164 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,929 |
|
|
|
306,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,479 |
|
|
|
404,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730,145 |
|
918,786 |
|
2,648,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,347 |
|
|
|
562,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,554 |
|
|
|
257,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136,571 |
|
1,136,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,669 |
|
|
|
158,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,531,395 |
|
1,531,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,062,791 |
|
|
|
901,716 |
|
901,716 |
|
1,659,304 |
|
1,659,304 |
|
829,651 |
|
|
|
4,148,259 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,340,104 |
|
670,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,010,156 |
|
|
|
759,503 |
|
759,503 |
|
1,452,034 |
|
1,452,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,904,069 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
27,418,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,418,295 |
|
|
|
15,866,003 |
|
15,866,003 |
|
|
|
30,540,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,540,510 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
15,335,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,335,657 |
|
|
|
12,675,768 |
|
12,675,768 |
|
17,110,472 |
|
16,594,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,705,049 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
23,235,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,235,843 |
|
|
|
8,241,742 |
|
8,241,742 |
|
|
|
25,143,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
25,143,298 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
15,335,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,335,656 |
|
|
|
10,771,619 |
|
10,771,619 |
|
17,110,472 |
|
16,594,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,705,049 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,840,616 |
|
15,840,616 |
|
17,110,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,110,472 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,326,059 |
|
20,326,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,672,493 |
|
12,672,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,560,411 |
|
10,560,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,280,206 |
|
5,280,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,280,206 |
|
5,280,206 |
|
10,139,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,139,539 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,224,164 |
|
4,224,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,069,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,069,769 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,674,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,674,424 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,139,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,139,539 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
11,617,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,617,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,069,769 |
|
12,571,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,641,418 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,970,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,970,933 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068,997 |
|
5,068,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,290 |
|
4,437,126 |
|
5,945,416 |
|
10,564,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564,564 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,290 |
|
4,437,126 |
|
5,945,416 |
|
10,564,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564,564 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,095,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095,330 |
|
160,537 |
|
3,202,738 |
|
3,363,275 |
|
12,810,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,810,950 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,095,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,177,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
989,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
471,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
412,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
412,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Bank loans per lender (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
Nominal |
|
Frequency |
|
Current |
| ||||
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
ID of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
Interest |
|
interest |
|
of |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Ciudad |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.84% |
|
15.84% |
|
Term |
|
10,029 |
|
|
|
10,029 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.22% |
|
15.22% |
|
Term |
|
729,446 |
|
|
|
729,446 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Frances |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
14.93% |
|
14.93% |
|
Term |
|
596,140 |
|
|
|
596,140 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Industrial |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.20% |
|
17.20% |
|
Term |
|
711,729 |
|
|
|
711,729 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Macro |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.75% |
|
17.75% |
|
Term |
|
2,391,059 |
|
|
|
2,391,059 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Itau - Nuevo Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
19.12% |
|
BPC + 5.25% |
|
Term |
|
245,369 |
|
2,314 |
|
247,683 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Standard - Nuevo Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
19.12% |
|
BPC + 5.25% |
|
Term |
|
539,813 |
|
5,092 |
|
544,905 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Santander - Nuevo Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
19.12% |
|
BPC + 5.25% |
|
Term |
|
392,591 |
|
3,703 |
|
396,294 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Hipotecario - Nuevo Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
19.12% |
|
BPC + 5.25% |
|
Term |
|
196,296 |
|
1,851 |
|
198,147 |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Galicia - Nuevo Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
19.12% |
|
BPC + 5.25% |
|
Term |
|
196,296 |
|
1,851 |
|
198,147 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Pnc Bank |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
3.09% |
|
3.09% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
|
|
208,031 |
|
208,031 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
Chile |
|
96,963,440-6 |
|
Sc Group |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
7.50% |
|
7.50% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
17,550,375 |
|
17,550,375 |
|
96,589,170-6 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
Export Development Corporation |
|
Canada |
|
US$ |
|
1.63% |
|
1.63% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,786,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
ID |
|
of |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,946 |
|
|
|
14,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,226,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
2,699,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,699,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,962,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,962,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
981,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
981,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,406 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,965,052 |
|
34,965,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,589,170-6 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,984 |
|
|
|
370,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,314,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
222,518,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,393,195 |
|
Appendix No. 4, section a) includes a detail of the estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to pay in relation to the mentioned bank loans.
3. The following table details Unsecured Debentures by currency and by maturity as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
· Summary of non-secured liabilities per currency and maturity date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Total Current |
|
One to |
|
Three to Five |
|
Five Years or |
|
Ten Years or |
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
8.36 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
14,689,969 |
|
|
|
14,689,969 |
|
185,675,099 |
|
92,366,575 |
|
|
|
141,090,149 |
|
419,131,823 |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
Quarterly |
|
5.19 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
1,091,599 |
|
6,912,481 |
|
8,004,080 |
|
10,534,675 |
|
11,178,341 |
|
74,197,193 |
|
301,485,003 |
|
397,395,212 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
6.88 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
870,099 |
|
3,801,453 |
|
4,671,552 |
|
|
|
7,528,779 |
|
22,558,691 |
|
4,683,530 |
|
34,771,000 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Quarterly |
|
6.60 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
378,187 |
|
49,456 |
|
427,643 |
|
12,504,975 |
|
8,053,204 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
28,894,829 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
Biannual |
|
7.84 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
82,818,221 |
|
82,818,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
229,794,716 |
|
35,294,634 |
|
265,089,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
17,029,854 |
|
93,581,611 |
|
110,611,465 |
|
208,714,749 |
|
119,126,899 |
|
330,718,925 |
|
486,721,641 |
|
1,145,282,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Total Current |
|
One to |
|
Three to Five |
|
Five Years or |
|
Ten Years or |
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
8.22 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
15,916,932 |
|
|
|
15,916,932 |
|
|
|
200,772,075 |
|
253,415,449 |
|
|
|
454,187,524 |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
Quarterly |
|
4.95 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
1,081,503 |
|
6,802,729 |
|
7,884,232 |
|
9,968,809 |
|
10,597,098 |
|
372,541,881 |
|
|
|
393,107,788 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Quarterly |
|
6.97 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
789,504 |
|
789,504 |
|
4,056,799 |
|
4,929,095 |
|
22,576,558 |
|
|
|
31,562,452 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
6.50 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
314,504 |
|
314,504 |
|
|
|
21,627,609 |
|
8,770,320 |
|
|
|
30,397,929 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
Biannual |
|
7.93 |
% |
Unsecured |
|
|
|
47,545,058 |
|
47,545,058 |
|
|
|
330,715,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
330,715,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
16,998,435 |
|
55,451,795 |
|
72,450,230 |
|
14,025,608 |
|
568,641,336 |
|
657,304,208 |
|
|
|
1,239,971,152 |
|
4. The following table details Secured Debentures by currency and by maturity as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
· Summary of secured liabilities per currency and maturity date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
Total Non- |
| ||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Current as |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Five |
|
Current as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
6.15 |
% |
Secured |
|
|
|
66,252 |
|
66,252 |
|
9,367,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,367,060 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Biannual |
|
6.26 |
% |
Secured |
|
4,373,389 |
|
5,082,647 |
|
9,456,036 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
8,336,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
4,373,389 |
|
5,148,899 |
|
9,522,288 |
|
13,535,385 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
17,703,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
Total Non- |
| ||||||
Country |
|
Currency |
|
Type of |
|
Nominal |
|
Guarantee |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Current as |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Five |
|
Current as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
Biannual |
|
6.06 |
% |
Secured |
|
|
|
72,618 |
|
72,618 |
|
10,141,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,141,998 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
Biannual |
|
6.28 |
% |
Secured |
|
|
|
10,950,797 |
|
10,950,797 |
|
9,647,352 |
|
8,770,320 |
|
|
|
18,417,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
11,023,415 |
|
11,023,415 |
|
19,789,350 |
|
8,770,320 |
|
|
|
28,559,670 |
|
The fair value of current and non-current bonds payable, both secured and unsecured, amounts to ThCh$ 1,580,500,960 and ThCh$ 1,681,709,406 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Secured and unsecured debentures per debtor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ID debtor |
|
Name of Company |
|
Country |
|
ID of lender |
|
Name of lender |
|
Country |
|
Type of |
|
Effective |
|
Nominal |
|
Frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.72 |
% |
6.72 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.47 |
% |
6.47 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.09 |
% |
6.09 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.16 |
% |
6.16 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.16 |
% |
6.16 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
5.91 |
% |
5.91 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.57 |
% |
6.06 |
% |
Yes |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.31 |
% |
6.31 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.28 |
% |
6.28 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.75 |
% |
6.63 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.44 |
% |
6.59 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.63 |
% |
6.63 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.59 |
% |
6.47 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.28 |
% |
5.97 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.34 |
% |
5.97 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
9.00 |
% |
6.34 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.78 |
% |
7.78 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.13 |
% |
7.13 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.63 |
% |
6.63 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.00 |
% |
6.00 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.09 |
% |
6.09 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.28 |
% |
7.28 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.97 |
% |
7.74 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos A-10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.21 |
% |
7.03 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B-103 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.33 |
% |
7.33 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos A102 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.39 |
% |
8.14 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos A5 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
5.32 |
% |
5.22 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.39 |
% |
8.14 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B15 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.29 |
% |
8.04 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos A5 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
9.27 |
% |
9.27 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B9 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.09 |
% |
7.86 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B12 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.30 |
% |
8.05 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos comerciales |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
4.20 |
% |
4.20 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos E5-09 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
9.27 |
% |
9.27 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B7 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.00 |
% |
8.00 |
% |
No |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
0-E |
|
Bonos B72 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.55 |
% |
8.55 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-1 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
7.96 |
% |
7.88 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-2 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
7.40 |
% |
7.33 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-3 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.26 |
% |
8.13 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,004,000-5 |
|
Banco Santander Chile 264 Serie-F |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
6.44 |
% |
6.20 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.50 |
% |
8.35 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
0-E |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.83 |
% |
8.63 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,004,000-5 |
|
Banco Santander Chile 317 Serie-H |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
7.17 |
% |
6.20 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,004,000-5 |
|
Banco Santander Chile 318 Serie-K |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
3.86 |
% |
3.80 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,004,000-5 |
|
Banco Santander Chile 522 Serie-M |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
4.82 |
% |
4.75 |
% |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ID debtor |
|
Name of Company |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More than |
|
Total non- |
|
Less |
|
More |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More |
|
Total non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,218,332 |
|
6,218,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
52,430 |
|
52,430 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
55,078 |
|
55,078 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,431,993 |
|
4,431,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
5,030,217 |
|
5,030,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,644 |
|
29,644 |
|
5,262,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,262,192 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
117,614 |
|
|
|
117,614 |
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
123,662 |
|
123,662 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
4,255,775 |
|
|
|
4,255,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,088 |
|
92,088 |
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
|
|
66,252 |
|
66,252 |
|
9,367,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,367,060 |
|
|
|
72,618 |
|
72,618 |
|
10,141,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,141,998 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
128,730 |
|
|
|
128,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
75,030 |
|
|
|
75,030 |
|
|
|
3,334,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,334,660 |
|
|
|
78,933 |
|
78,933 |
|
|
|
3,508,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,508,128 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
76,767 |
|
|
|
76,767 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
80,760 |
|
80,760 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
29,070 |
|
29,070 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
30,582 |
|
30,582 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
13,808 |
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,168,325 |
|
|
|
14,526 |
|
14,526 |
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,385,160 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
97,660 |
|
|
|
97,660 |
|
|
|
4,718,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,718,544 |
|
|
|
102,783 |
|
102,783 |
|
|
|
4,964,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,964,001 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
127,919 |
|
|
|
127,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
108,963 |
|
108,963 |
|
4,056,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,056,799 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
100,637 |
|
3,746,824 |
|
3,847,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,506 |
|
138,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
127,923 |
|
|
|
127,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
59,148 |
|
59,148 |
|
|
|
4,929,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,929,095 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
54,629 |
|
54,629 |
|
|
|
4,552,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,552,391 |
|
|
|
143,209 |
|
143,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,140,994 |
|
|
|
4,140,994 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
132,266 |
|
|
|
132,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,824,571 |
|
|
|
3,824,571 |
|
|
|
102,050 |
|
102,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,222,567 |
|
|
|
3,222,567 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
94,171 |
|
|
|
94,171 |
|
|
|
2,976,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,976,388 |
|
|
|
153,978 |
|
153,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
142,213 |
|
|
|
142,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
83,650 |
|
83,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
|
|
5,070,999 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
77,278 |
|
|
|
77,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
67,692 |
|
|
|
67,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
4,683,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,674 |
|
77,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
54,124,027 |
|
|
|
54,124,027 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
411,850 |
|
411,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
51,088,180 |
|
|
|
51,088,180 |
|
|
|
313,888 |
|
313,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
42,170,891 |
|
|
|
42,170,891 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
2,810,154 |
|
2,810,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
42,837,829 |
|
|
|
42,837,829 |
|
|
|
2,781,270 |
|
2,781,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,922,563 |
|
|
|
9,922,563 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
78,448 |
|
78,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,384,105 |
|
|
|
9,384,105 |
|
|
|
41,039,701 |
|
41,039,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
59,535,375 |
|
|
|
59,535,375 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
83,357 |
|
83,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,027,617 |
|
|
|
12,027,617 |
|
|
|
98,880 |
|
98,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,264,287 |
|
|
|
12,264,287 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
449,458 |
|
449,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,938,924 |
|
|
|
38,938,924 |
|
|
|
446,152 |
|
446,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,705,134 |
|
|
|
39,705,134 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
161,483 |
|
161,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,501,876 |
|
13,501,876 |
|
|
|
160,448 |
|
160,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,767,556 |
|
|
|
13,767,556 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,063,229 |
|
1,063,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,876,468 |
|
|
|
22,876,468 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
1,108,613 |
|
1,108,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
53,083,052 |
|
|
|
53,083,052 |
|
|
|
1,101,083 |
|
1,101,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
54,127,579 |
|
|
|
54,127,579 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
465,607 |
|
465,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,792,758 |
|
21,792,758 |
|
|
|
462,733 |
|
462,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,221,579 |
|
|
|
22,221,579 |
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
17,113,595 |
|
17,113,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
1,042,712 |
|
1,042,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,435,009 |
|
|
|
22,435,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
44,319,708 |
|
44,319,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-E |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
14,773,236 |
|
14,773,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
3,161,628 |
|
|
|
3,161,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,921,874 |
|
94,921,874 |
|
3,425,699 |
|
|
|
3,425,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
102,917,226 |
|
|
|
102,917,226 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,011,025 |
|
|
|
1,011,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,652,675 |
|
32,652,675 |
|
1,095,470 |
|
|
|
1,095,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
35,440,766 |
|
|
|
35,440,766 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
640,355 |
|
|
|
640,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,515,600 |
|
13,515,600 |
|
693,840 |
|
|
|
693,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,095,048 |
|
|
|
15,095,048 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,091,599 |
|
321,834 |
|
1,413,433 |
|
1,609,167 |
|
2,252,833 |
|
12,873,329 |
|
12,248,538 |
|
28,983,867 |
|
1,081,503 |
|
314,143 |
|
1,395,646 |
|
1,256,571 |
|
1,884,860 |
|
25,832,339 |
|
|
|
28,973,770 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
6,513,139 |
|
|
|
6,513,139 |
|
185,675,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,675,099 |
|
7,057,142 |
|
|
|
7,057,142 |
|
|
|
200,772,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
200,772,075 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
3,363,822 |
|
|
|
3,363,822 |
|
|
|
92,366,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
92,366,575 |
|
3,644,781 |
|
|
|
3,644,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
99,962,409 |
|
|
|
99,962,409 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
5,497,845 |
|
5,497,845 |
|
8,925,508 |
|
8,925,508 |
|
22,313,773 |
|
31,967,591 |
|
72,132,380 |
|
|
|
5,421,895 |
|
5,421,895 |
|
8,712,238 |
|
8,712,238 |
|
57,413,607 |
|
|
|
74,838,083 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
673,096 |
|
673,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,561,441 |
|
85,561,441 |
|
|
|
657,013 |
|
657,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
83,760,687 |
|
|
|
83,760,687 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
419,706 |
|
419,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,010,091 |
|
171,707,433 |
|
210,717,524 |
|
|
|
409,678 |
|
409,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
205,535,248 |
|
|
|
205,535,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,133,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,162,985,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
83,473,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268,530,822 |
|
Appendix No. 4, section b) includes a detail of the estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to pay in relation to the mentioned secured and non-secured liabilities.
· Financial Lease per Debtor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Nominal |
|
Less |
|
More |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than |
|
Total non- |
|
debtor |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
90 days |
|
90 days |
|
current |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
10 years |
|
current |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Endesa S.A. (Chile) |
|
Chile |
|
87,509,100-K |
|
Abengoa Chile |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
881,720 |
|
881,720 |
|
3,004,174 |
|
2,342,336 |
|
7,325,181 |
|
5,083,160 |
|
17,754,851 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
2.02 |
% |
1,877,853 |
|
5,562,774 |
|
7,440,627 |
|
12,096,296 |
|
11,246,668 |
|
16,687,463 |
|
|
|
40,030,427 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
96,976,410-5 |
|
Gasred S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
249,450 |
|
249,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
1,877,853 |
|
6,693,944 |
|
8,571,797 |
|
15,100,470 |
|
13,589,004 |
|
24,012,644 |
|
5,083,160 |
|
57,785,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Nominal |
|
Less |
|
More |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than |
|
Total non- |
|
debtor |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
90 days |
|
90 days |
|
current |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
10 years |
|
current |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Endesa S.A. (Chile) |
|
Chile |
|
87,509,100-K |
|
Abengoa Chile |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
897,056 |
|
897,056 |
|
3,056,426 |
|
2,383,077 |
|
14,753,667 |
|
|
|
20,193,170 |
|
0-E |
|
Edegel |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
8,485,635 |
|
8,485,635 |
|
28,873,973 |
|
9,844,821 |
|
24,156,332 |
|
|
|
62,875,126 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
96,976,410-5 |
|
Gasred S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
249,240 |
|
249,240 |
|
270,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
9,631,931 |
|
9,631,931 |
|
32,200,937 |
|
12,227,898 |
|
38,909,999 |
|
|
|
83,338,834 |
|
Appendix No. 4, section c) includes a detail of the estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to pay in relation to the mentioned financial leases.
· Other Loans per Debtor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||
|
|
Name |
|
|
|
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Nominal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
interest |
|
Less than |
|
More tha |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
Total non- |
|
debtor |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
90 days |
|
n 90 days |
|
current |
|
years |
|
years |
|
current |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Mitsubishi (deuda garantizada) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
7.42 |
% |
17,408,628 |
|
8,223,739 |
|
25,632,367 |
|
|
|
37,523,997 |
|
37,523,997 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Mitsubishi (deuda no garantizada) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,332,589 |
|
12,332,589 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Other |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
9.59 |
% |
1,542,295 |
|
1,517,680 |
|
3,059,975 |
|
1,011,826 |
|
|
|
1,011,826 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Endesa S.A. (Chile) |
|
Chile |
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
894 |
|
894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792,809 |
|
|
|
792,809 |
|
96,827,970-K |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
96,601,250-1 |
|
Inversiones Centinela S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,950,923 |
|
9,742,313 |
|
28,693,236 |
|
1,804,635 |
|
62,251,836 |
|
64,056,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||
|
|
Name |
|
|
|
ID |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Nominal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
interest |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
Total non- |
|
debtor |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
90 days |
|
current |
|
years |
|
years |
|
current |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Mitsubishi (deuda garantizada) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
7.42 |
% |
11,158,204 |
|
11,158,204 |
|
8,788,901 |
|
7,591,100 |
|
16,380,001 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Mitsubishi (deuda no garantizada) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
7.42 |
% |
11,158,205 |
|
11,158,205 |
|
22,261,205 |
|
19,227,325 |
|
41,488,530 |
|
0-E |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
0-E |
|
Other |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
9.59 |
% |
7,414,204 |
|
7,414,204 |
|
3,002,567 |
|
|
|
3,002,567 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Endesa S.A. (Chile) |
|
Chile |
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
1.58 |
% |
1,661 |
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894,018 |
|
|
|
894,018 |
|
96,827,970-K |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
96,601,250-1 |
|
Inversiones Centinela S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,953,000 |
|
|
|
11,953,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,732,274 |
|
29,732,274 |
|
46,899,691 |
|
26,818,425 |
|
73,718,116 |
|
Appendix No. 4, section d) includes a detail of the estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted) that the Group will have to pay in relation to the mentioned loans.
5. Debt designated as hedging instrument.
Of Endesa Chiles US dollar denominated debt, as of December 31, 2010, ThCh$ 679,999,810 is related to future cash flow hedges for the Groups US dollar linked operating income (see Note 3.k). As of December 31, 2009, this amount totals ThCh$ 964,291,218.
The following table details movements in Reserve of cash flow hedges during 2010, 2009 and 2008 due to exchange differences of this debt:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Balance in hedging at the beginning of year |
|
85,798,007 |
|
(96,503,511 |
) |
169,344,561 |
|
Foreign currency differences exchange recorded in net equity |
|
26,100,215 |
|
187,292,646 |
|
(252,006,999 |
) |
Recognition of foreign currency exchange differences in profit or loss |
|
(10,748,334 |
) |
(4,991,128 |
) |
(13,841,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance in hedging |
|
101,149,888 |
|
85,798,007 |
|
(96,503,511 |
) |
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Endesa Chile had available long-term credit lines totaling ThCh$ 144,776,000 and ThCh$ 152,130,000, respectively.
Several of the companys debt agreements and some agreements entered into by its subsidiaries include an obligation to comply with certain financial ratios, which is customary for agreements of this nature. This also includes affirmative and negative obligations that require these commitments to be monitored. In addition, the contracts default sections include restrictions requiring compliance.
Some of the Companys debt agreements include cross default clauses. The syndicated loan maintained by the Company under the law of the State of New York which matures in July 2011 and has not recorded any disbursements up to this date, establishes that cross default can arise as a result of a default in payment, whether of interest or principal, by Endesa Chile or its Relevant Subsidiaries. The syndicated loan maintained by the Company under the law of the State of New York which was entered into in 2008 and matures in 2014, and records payments of US$ 200 million up to this date, does not include any references to subsidiaries and, accordingly, the cross default can only arise from another own debt. For the acceleration of one or more of the existing loans to occur as a result of cross default arising from another debt, the amount in default must exceed US$ 50 million or the equivalent in other currencies; further, other additional conditions must be met including the expiration of grace periods (if any), and the formal notification of the intention to accelerate the debt by the creditors representing over 50% of the balance indebted under the agreement. In addition, in December 2009, Endesa Chile obtained loans under Chilean laws establishing that cross default can arise only from default by the debtor. In relation to these loans, the amount in default must exceed US$50 million or the equivalent in other currencies. Since obtainment, these loans have never been disbursed.
For the Companys bonds recorded with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commonly named Yankee Bonds, the cross default could arise from another debt maintained by the same company or any of its Chilean subsidiaries regardless of the amount in default provided that the principal of the debt giving rise to the cross default exceeds US$ 30 million or the equivalent in other currencies.
The acceleration of the debt due to cross default does not occur automatically but must be requested by the holders of al least 25% of the bonds of a Yankee Bonds series. In addition, the bankruptcy or insolvency of foreign subsidiaries do not have any contractual effects on the Companys Yankee Bonds.
The Companys local bonds stipulate that the cross default can only arise from default by the issuer when the balance in default exceeds US$ 50 million or the equivalent in other currencies. Acceleration must be requested by a board of holders of at least 50% of the bonds of a given serie.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, neither Endesa Chile nor any of its subsidiaries have defaulted on the financial obligations summarized here or any other contractual obligations for which a default could give rise to early acceleration of its financial obligations.
The Groups companies are exposed to certain risks that are managed by implementing systems to identify, measure, limit concentration of and supervise risks.
The basic principles outlined by the Group include the following:
· Compliance with corporate governance standards.
· Strict compliance with all of the Group`s internal policies.
· Each business and corporate area defines:
I. The markets and products, in which they can operate, based on sufficient knowledge and capability to ensure effective risk management.
II. Criteria regarding third parties.
III. Authorized operators.
· Businesses and corporate areas establish their risk tolerance in a manner consistent with the defined strategy for each market in which they operate.
· All of the operations of the businesses and corporate areas are performed within limits approved by the corresponding internal authorities.
· Businesses, corporate areas, lines of business and companies design risk management controls that are necessary to ensure that transactions in the markets are conducted in accordance with Endesa Chile`s policies, standards and procedures.
Variations in interest rates alter the fair value of assets and liabilities that accrue interest at a fixed rate, as well as future cash flows from assets and liabilities with a variable interest rate.
The objective of interest rate risk management is to achieve a balanced debt structure that minimizes the cost of debt, with reduced volatility in the income statement.
Complying with the current interest rate hedging policy, the percentage of fixed and/or protected debt over total net debt is 70% as of December 31, 2010.
Depending on the Groups estimates and debt structure objectives, hedging transactions take place through contracted derivatives that mitigate these risks. The instruments currently used to comply with this policy are interest rate swaps that set the rate from variable to fixed.
Endesa Chile Groups financial debt structure according to fixed, protected and variable rates, after contracted derivatives, is the following:
Net position:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
Fixed interest rate |
|
70 |
|
46 |
|
Protected interest rate |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
Variable interest rate |
|
30 |
|
53 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
Exchange rate risk relates mainly to the following transactions:
· Debt contracted by the Groups companies that is denominated in a foreign currency, when the Companys contribution margin is not highly indexed to such foreign currency.
· Payments to be made in international markets for the acquisition of project related materials.
· Group company income directly linked to dollar changes.
· Cash flows from foreign subsidiaries to the Chilean parent company, exposed to exchange rate fluctuations.
In order to mitigate exchange rate risk, the Endesa Chile Groups exchange rate hedging policy is based on cash flows and maintaining a balance between flows indexed to the US dollar and the levels of assets and liabilities in that currency. The objective is to minimize the exposure of flows to exchange rate variation risk.
The instruments currently used to comply with the policy are currency swaps and exchange rate forwards. Likewise, the policy seeks to refinance debt in the functional currency of each company.
The Endesa Chile Group is exposed to price fluctuation risks of some commodities, mainly through:
· Fuel purchases for the electricity generation process.
· Energy buying/selling transactions on local markets.
The company does not engage in derivative instrument transactions for commodities to manage fuel price fluctuations; however, it is continuously analyzing and verifying the suitability of this type of hedge, and therefore does not rule out possible use of this type of tool in the future.
In order to reduce risk in extreme drought, the Company has designed a commercial policy that defines sales commitment levels consistent with its generation plants sound energy capacity in a dry year and includes risk mitigation clauses in some contracts with unregulated clients.
The Groups liquidity policy consists of contracting committed long-term credit facilities and temporary financial investments for amounts sufficient to support projected needs for a period that reflects the situation and expectations of debt and capital markets.
These projected needs include net financial debt maturity, after financial derivatives. For more detail regarding the characteristics and conditions of financial debts and financial derivatives see Note 16, Note 18 and Appendix 4, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, the Endesa Group had liquidity of ThCh$ 333,269,859 in cash and cash equivalents and ThCh$ 144,776,000 in unconditionally available credit lines. As of December 31, 2009, the Group had liquidity of ThCh$ 446,438,229 in cash and cash equivalents and ThCh$ 152,130,000 in unconditionally available credit lines.
Given the current economic climate, the Group has been carefully following its credit risk.
Trade receivables:
Credit risk for receivables from commercial activity is historically very limited, given the short length of time before payment is due, which limits the accumulation of significant individual amounts.
In some countries, supply may be cut in cases of non-payment, and in almost all contracts a clause is established to terminate the contract upon payment default. Therefore, the company constantly monitors credit risk and measures maximum amounts exposed to payment risks, which are limited.
Financial assets:
Investments of cash surpluses are made in prime national and foreign financial entities (with investment grade equivalent risk ratings) within established limits for each entity.
In the selection of banks for investment, consideration is given to those that hold at least two investment grade ratings from the three major international rating agencies (Moodys, S&P and Fitch).
Positions are backed by treasury bonds from the country of operations and/or commercial papers issued by highly-reputable banks, with a preference to the extent possible on the first option.
Derivatives are engaged through highly solvent entities, such that about 90% of the transactions are with entities that hold an A or higher rating.
The Endesa Chile Group measures the Value at Risk of its debt and financial derivatives positions with the aim of ensuring that the risk assumed by the company remains consistent with the risk exposure defined by Management, thus restricting volatility in the income statement.
The positions portfolio included in the calculations of the current Value at Risk is composed of:
· Debt
· Financial derivatives.
The calculated Value at Risk represents the possible loss in value of the aforementioned positions portfolio over a one-day time period with 95% confidence. To find this value, a study has been performed of the volatility of risk variables that affect the value of the positions portfolio, including:
· The US dollar Libor interest rate.
· The customary local banking index for debt, and taking into account the different currencies our companies operate under.
· The exchange rates of the different currencies involved in the calculation.
The Value at Risk calculation, using the Monte Carlo methods, is based on generating possible future scenarios (on a one-day time horizon) of the risk variables of the market values (both spot and timed). The number of scenarios generated ensures observance of the simulations convergence criteria. In the simulated scenarios of future prices, the volatilities matrix and the correlations between the different risk variables calculated on historic price logarithmic returns are applied.
Once the price scenarios are generated, the fair value of the portfolio is calculated for each scenario, obtaining a distribution of possible values over one day. The one-day Value at Risk with 95% confidence is calculated as a 5% percentile of the possible increase in fair value of the portfolio in one day.
The valuation of the diverse debt and financial derivative positions in the calculation has been consistent with the economic equity calculation method reported to the Management.
Taking into account the assumptions described above, the Value at Risk of the previously discussed positions, broken down by type of position, is shown in the following table:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||
Financial positions |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest rate |
|
20,338,359 |
|
16,308,634 |
|
Exchange rate |
|
245,827 |
|
734,415 |
|
Correlation |
|
3,063,908 |
|
(813,296 |
) |
Total |
|
23,648,094 |
|
16,229,753 |
|
The Value at Risk positions has changed during 2010 and 2009 based on the maturity/commencement of transactions during the period.
18.1 Classification of financial asset instruments by nature and category
a) The following table details financial asset instruments, classified by nature and category, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at fair value |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
through profit |
|
held to |
|
Loans and |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
held for trading |
|
and loss |
|
maturity |
|
receivables |
|
financial assets |
|
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
17,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,650 |
|
Other assets of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,710,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
17,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
329,710,915 |
|
|
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,485,615 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
91,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,387,885 |
|
Other assets of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,792,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current |
|
91,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
126,792,241 |
|
2,485,615 |
|
25,387,885 |
|
Total |
|
108,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
456,503,156 |
|
2,485,615 |
|
25,442,535 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at fair value |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
through profit |
|
held to |
|
Loans and |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
held for trading |
|
and loss |
|
maturity |
|
receivables |
|
financial assets |
|
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
1,536,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,746,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
1,536,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
400,746,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,487,796 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
732,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590,622 |
|
Other assets of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,047,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current |
|
732,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
67,047,589 |
|
2,487,796 |
|
590,622 |
|
Total |
|
2,268,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
467,793,931 |
|
2,487,796 |
|
590,622 |
|
b) The following table details financial liability instruments, classified by nature and category, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
fair value through profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
held for trading |
|
and loss |
|
Loans and payables |
|
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest-bearing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
249,185,637 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
908,928 |
|
Other liabilities of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
603,627,667 |
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
|
|
|
852,813,304 |
|
908,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing loans |
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
1,510,746,571 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,487,602 |
|
Other liabilities of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
14,759,031 |
|
|
|
Total non-current |
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
1,525,505,602 |
|
4,487,602 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
2,378,318,906 |
|
5,396,530 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
fair value through profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
held for trading |
|
and loss |
|
Loans and payables |
|
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest-bearing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
345,355,943 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
420,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
717,980 |
|
Other liabilities of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
466,900,777 |
|
|
|
Total current |
|
420,822 |
|
|
|
812,256,720 |
|
717,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing loans |
|
|
|
11,953,000 |
|
1,780,027,967 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,929,730 |
|
Other liabilities of a financial nature |
|
|
|
|
|
20,358,014 |
|
|
|
Total non-current |
|
|
|
11,953,000 |
|
1,800,385,981 |
|
2,929,730 |
|
Total |
|
420,822 |
|
11,953,000 |
|
2,612,642,701 |
|
3,647,710 |
|
In adhering to its risk management policy, the Endesa Group enters into interest and exchange rate derivatives.
The company classifies its hedges as:
· Cash flow hedges: Those that hedge the cash flows of the hedged underlying item.
· Fair values hedges: Those that hedge the fair value of the hedged underlying item.
· Non-hedge derivatives: Financial derivatives that do not meet the requirements established by IFRS to be designated as hedge instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in net income (assets held for trading).
a) Assets and liabilities for hedge derivative instruments
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, financial derivative transactions that qualify as hedge instruments resulted in recognition of the following assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
| ||||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest rate hedge: |
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
334,843 |
|
4,487,602 |
|
|
|
509,760 |
|
717,980 |
|
2,929,730 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
334,843 |
|
4,487,602 |
|
|
|
509,760 |
|
717,980 |
|
2,929,730 |
|
Exchange rate hedge: |
|
|
|
25,387,885 |
|
574,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
25,387,885 |
|
574,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
54,650 |
|
25,387,885 |
|
908,928 |
|
4,487,602 |
|
|
|
590,622 |
|
717,980 |
|
2,929,730 |
|
· General Information Relating to Hedge Derivative Instruments
The following table details the companys hedge derivative instruments and the associated underlying item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
Detail of |
|
Description of |
|
Description of Instruments |
|
Fair Value of |
|
Fair Value of |
|
Nature of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
SWAP |
|
Interest rate |
|
Bank Loans |
|
(4,822,445 |
) |
(2,453,022 |
) |
Cash flow |
|
SWAP |
|
Exchange rate |
|
Bank Loans |
|
(519,435 |
) |
80,952 |
|
Cash flow |
|
SWAP |
|
Exchange rate |
|
Unsecured liabilities (bonds) |
|
25,387,885 |
|
|
|
Cash flow |
|
COLLAR |
|
Interest rate |
|
Bank Loans |
|
|
|
(685,018 |
) |
Cash flow |
|
For years 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Group had not recognized significant gains or losses for ineffective cash flow hedges
b) Derivative instrument assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in net income
As of December 31 and 2010, 2009, financial derivative transactions recorded at fair value with changes in net income, resulted in the recognition of the following assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Current |
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
Current |
|
Current |
|
Non- |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Non-hedging derivative instruments |
|
17,551 |
|
|
|
91,262 |
|
|
|
1,536,089 |
|
420,822 |
|
732,253 |
|
|
|
c) Other information about derivative instruments:
The following table details the Groups financial derivatives as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, their fair values as well as their notional and contractual values by maturity:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Notional value |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent |
|
|
|
Financial derivatives |
|
Fair value |
|
Before 1 year |
|
1 - 2 Years |
|
2 - 3 Years |
|
3 - 4 Years |
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest rate hedge: |
|
(4,767,795 |
) |
16,841,269 |
|
|
|
10,670,628 |
|
93,602,000 |
|
|
|
13,385,086 |
|
134,498,983 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
(4,767,795 |
) |
16,841,269 |
|
|
|
10,670,628 |
|
93,602,000 |
|
|
|
13,385,086 |
|
134,498,983 |
|
Exchange rate hedge: |
|
24,813,800 |
|
7,059,982 |
|
4,680,100 |
|
|
|
189,274,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
201,014,665 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
24,813,800 |
|
7,059,982 |
|
4,680,100 |
|
|
|
189,274,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
201,014,665 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
108,813 |
|
72,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,537 |
|
TOTAL |
|
20,154,818 |
|
23,973,788 |
|
4,680,100 |
|
10,670,628 |
|
282,876,583 |
|
|
|
13,385,086 |
|
335,586,185 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Notional value |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent |
|
|
|
Financial derivatives |
|
Fair value |
|
Before 1 year |
|
1 - 2 Years |
|
2 - 3 Years |
|
3 - 4 Years |
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Interest rate hedge: |
|
(3,137,950 |
) |
37,987,629 |
|
24,941,637 |
|
25,121,734 |
|
1,825,560 |
|
101,420,000 |
|
|
|
191,296,560 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
(3,137,950 |
) |
37,987,629 |
|
24,941,637 |
|
25,121,734 |
|
1,825,560 |
|
101,420,000 |
|
|
|
191,296,560 |
|
Exchange rate hedge: |
|
80,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,071,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,071,000 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
80,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,071,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,071,000 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
1,847,520 |
|
91,970,309 |
|
31,945,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,915,564 |
|
TOTAL |
|
(1,209,568 |
) |
129,957,938 |
|
56,886,892 |
|
30,192,734 |
|
1,825,560 |
|
101,420,000 |
|
|
|
320,283,124 |
|
The contractual notional amount of these contracts does not represent the risk assumed by the Group as it is only in response to the basis with which derivative settlements are calculated.
18.3.1 Financial instruments recognized at fair value in the statement of financial position are classified based on the hierarchies described in Note 3.f .5.
The following table details financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
Fair value measured at the end of the |
| ||||
Financial instruments measured at fair value |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
25,442,535 |
|
|
|
25,442,535 |
|
|
|
Derivatives ot designated as hedge accounting |
|
108,813 |
|
|
|
108,813 |
|
|
|
Long-Term Available-for-Sale Financial Assets |
|
63,327 |
|
63,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
25,614,675 |
|
63,327 |
|
25,551,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
5,396,530 |
|
|
|
5,396,530 |
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
17,791,780 |
|
|
|
5,396,530 |
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measured at the end of the |
| ||||
Financial instruments measured at fair value |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
590,622 |
|
|
|
590,622 |
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
2,268,342 |
|
|
|
2,268,342 |
|
|
|
Long-Term Available-for-Sale Financial Assets |
|
63,918 |
|
63,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
2,922,882 |
|
63,918 |
|
2,858,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
3,647,710 |
|
|
|
3,647,710 |
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
420,822 |
|
|
|
420,822 |
|
|
|
Interest-bearing loans short-term |
|
11,953,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,953,000 |
|
Total |
|
16,021,532 |
|
|
|
4,068,532 |
|
11,953,000 |
|
18.3.2 A rollforward (beginning balance to ending balance) of the financial instruments measured on a recurring basis at fair value using level 3 inputs:
Non-current interest-bearing loans |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
2,429,372 |
|
Total losses recognized in Finance Profit or Loss |
|
9,523,628 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
11,953,000 |
|
(Gains) recognized in Finance Profit or Loss |
|
442,250 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
12,395,250 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this account is detailed as follows:
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||
Trade and other payables |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
48,857,285 |
|
57,135,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables |
|
328,620,420 |
|
316,736,158 |
|
3,738,357 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
Total accounts payable and other payables |
|
377,477,705 |
|
373,871,856 |
|
3,738,357 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
The detail of accounts payable and other payables at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Non-Current |
| ||||
|
|
Current |
|
1 to 5 years |
| ||||
Trade and other payables |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Trade payables for the purchase of energy |
|
118,514,681 |
|
45,397,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables for the purchase of fuels and gas |
|
110,816,084 |
|
40,229,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable related to goods and services |
|
64,586,392 |
|
223,334,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable to third parties |
|
48,399,940 |
|
36,555,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customers advances (mining) |
|
8,877,873 |
|
11,377,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement with Mitsubishi (LTSA) |
|
3,397,620 |
|
|
|
3,288,535 |
|
7,361,867 |
|
Other accounts payable |
|
22,885,115 |
|
16,977,197 |
|
449,822 |
|
207,872 |
|
Total accounts payable and other payables |
|
377,477,705 |
|
373,871,856 |
|
3,738,357 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
The liquidity risk management policy is described in Note 17.4.
a) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this account is detailed as follows:
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||
Provisions |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Legal proceedings provision |
|
5,825,216 |
|
7,298,126 |
|
9,365,226 |
|
9,488,260 |
|
Decomissioning, restoration and rehabilitation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
10,735,966 |
|
10,198,489 |
|
Energy and capacity purchase provision |
|
4,318,563 |
|
2,581,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers and services provision |
|
20,133,683 |
|
8,897,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits provision |
|
8,259,543 |
|
11,585,987 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Other provisions |
|
6,020,377 |
|
3,029,915 |
|
817,321 |
|
473,258 |
|
Total |
|
44,557,382 |
|
33,393,224 |
|
20,918,513 |
|
20,160,585 |
|
b) Movements in provisions during 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
Legal |
|
Decomissioning, |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Movements in Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance as at January 1, 2010 |
|
16,786,386 |
|
10,198,489 |
|
26,568,934 |
|
53,553,809 |
|
Movements in Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Provisions |
|
1,746,972 |
|
|
|
11,621,641 |
|
13,368,613 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Existing Provisions |
|
(1,584,616 |
) |
555,769 |
|
2,369,236 |
|
1,340,389 |
|
Provision Used |
|
(616,990 |
) |
|
|
(436,662 |
) |
(1,053,652 |
) |
Increase from Time Value of Money Adjustment |
|
(455,441 |
) |
56,434 |
|
|
|
(399,007 |
) |
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
(696,576 |
) |
(74,726 |
) |
(491,977 |
) |
(1,263,279 |
) |
Other Increases (Decreases) |
|
10,707 |
|
|
|
(81,685 |
) |
(70,978 |
) |
Total Movements in Provisions |
|
(1,595,944 |
) |
537,477 |
|
12,980,553 |
|
11,922,086 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
15,190,442 |
|
10,735,966 |
|
39,549,487 |
|
65,475,895 |
|
|
|
Legal |
|
Decomissioning, |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Movements in Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance as at January 1, 2009 |
|
16,318,397 |
|
2,347,872 |
|
18,330,717 |
|
36,996,986 |
|
Movements in Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Provisions |
|
10,856,894 |
|
8,145,666 |
|
(318,365 |
) |
18,684,195 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Existing Provisions |
|
(2,157,517 |
) |
(65,100 |
) |
5,809,135 |
|
3,586,518 |
|
Provision Used |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,474,122 |
) |
(2,474,122 |
) |
Increase from Time Value of Money Adjustment |
|
26,940 |
|
91,233 |
|
|
|
118,173 |
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
(191,588 |
) |
(321,182 |
) |
(1,969,698 |
) |
(2,482,468 |
) |
Other Increases (Decreases) |
|
(8,066,740 |
) |
|
|
7,191,267 |
|
(875,473 |
) |
Total Movements in Provisions |
|
467,989 |
|
7,850,617 |
|
8,238,217 |
|
16,556,823 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
16,786,386 |
|
10,198,489 |
|
26,568,934 |
|
53,553,809 |
|
20.2 Lawsuits and arbitration proceedings
As of the date of preparation of these consolidated financial statements, the principal lawsuits or arbitration proceedings to which the Group companies are party are detailed as follows:
a) Outstanding lawsuits involving Endesa Chile and Subsidiaries:
1. In 2005, three lawsuits were filed against Endesa Chile, the Treasury (Fisco) and the General Water Board (Dirección General de Aguas or DGA), which are currently being treated as a single proceeding. The lawsuit request the annulment of DGA Resolution 134 that gave Endesa the right to non-consumptive use of water for the Neltume Power Plant project. The lawsuit also request compensation for damages. Alternatively, the lawsuit requests compensation for damages allegedly caused to the plaintiffs by the loss of quality of their properties on the shores of Lake Pirehueico, and by the loss in value of their properties. The defendant has rejected these allegations on the grounds that, among other arguments, the DGA Resolution 134 meets all legal requirements and the exercise by Endesa Chile of this right does not cause any damages to the plaintiffs. At this date, the proceeding is at the stage of receiving evidence by the parties. The amount related to these lawsuits is undetermined.
2. There were five proceedings initiated between 2008 and 2009 against Pangue S.A., a subsidiary of Endesa Chile, where the plaintiffs seek compensation for losses incurred by flooding that, according to the plaintiffs, was caused by the operation of the Pangue S.A. hydroelectric power plant during July 2006. Pangue S.A. responded to such lawsuits arguing that it was in compliance with existing regulations in the operation of the power plant and that it acted with due diligence and care. Consequently, Pangue S.A. claims that there is no causal relationship between the flooding and the operation of the power plant during the relevant period. These proceedings were filed in various courts and currently one of them is close to being resolved and two of them are at the discovery stage. In one of the two remaining proceedings, the courts ruled in favor of Pangue S.A., and currently there are pending appeals filed with the court of appeals by the plaintiffs. The remaining proceeding is no longer in effect due to inactivity by the plaintiffs. The amount claimed in the four proceedings that are still in effect is equal to ThCh$ 17,718,704 (US$ 37.86 million) in the aggregate. As for the proceeding that was closed, it entailed ThCh$ 1,916,466 (US$ 4 million) and is not covered in terms of equity risk by an insurance company. The potential damages arising from the four proceedings that are in effect are covered by insurance.
3. During 2010, several plaintiffs initiated four judicial proceedings against Endesa Chile seeking compensation for flooding of the Bio Bio river in the VIII Region. In these proceedings, the plaintiffs blame the company for losses attributed to the poor operation of the Ralco hydroelectric power plant during the flooding. In one of the proceedings, the lawsuit also includes the Public Works Ministry (MOP). In November 2010, the plaintiff withdrew the claim against Endesa but decided to continue it against MOP. The remaining lawsuits are currently in evidentiary hearing. The plaintiff has the burden to prove causation between the operation of the Ralco hydroelectric plant and the flooding during the period in question (i.e., that the flooding was caused by poor operation of the plant). The amount of the three proceedings that are currently in effect against Endesa Chile equals ThCh $ 14,610,043 (US$ 31.21 million). The proceeding against Endesa Chile that was dismissed by the plaintiff amounted to ThCh$33,751,490 (US$72.11 million). All of the risks arising from these proceedings are covered by an insurance policy.
4. In July and September of 2010, Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid S.A. and Transportes Silva y Silva Limitada, filed separate lawsuits against Endesa Chile and the Dirección General de Aguas (DGA), to nullify and void the administrative resolution that granted to Endesa Chile use of the water rights for the Neltume hydroelectric plant, and the administrative resolution that authorized the transfer of the collection point of such rights. The real goal of the plaintiffs is to obtain payment for their water rights that are located in an area of the hydraulic works of the future Neltume hydroelectric power plant. Endesa Chile has rejected the claims, arguing that the plaintiffs are attempting to unlawfully litigate to prevent the construction of the plant in order to obtain compensation. The discussion period in the proceeding initiated by Ingeniería y Construcción Madrid S.A has expired and Endesa Chile has responded to the lawsuit in the proceeding initiated by Transportes Silva y Silva Limitada. The amount involved in these proceedings are undetermined.
5. The Municipalities of Yaguará, Ubalá, Caloto and Puerto Tejeda seek to impose penalties on Emgesa S.A. ESP for failure to file the ICT (Industry and Commerce Tax) tax return in accordance with Law 14 of 1981, which imposes taxes based on revenues, rather than in accordance with Law 56 of 1981, which imposes taxes on generation companies based solely on the installed generation capacity of their plants. The municipalities seek fines of up to 20% of the difference between the taxes paid by the Company and those that the municipalities are claiming. In some of these lawsuits, the court has ordered evidentiary proceedings; in others, the court has called the parties for final presentation of their pleadings, and others are ready for the issuance of a judgment. In the case of Ubalá, the municipality filed an appeal against the first ruling in favor of Emgesa issued by the administrative court (Tribunal Administrativo). Such appeal was also resolved in favor of the Company by the state council (Consejo de Estado). The current total amount involved in these proceedings is approximately US$ 57.70 million.
6. In 2001, the inhabitants of Sibaté, Department of Cundinamarca filed a claim against the Colombian generating subsidiary Emgesa S.A. ESP., Empresa de Energía de Bogotá S.A. ESP. and the Corporación Autónoma Regional seeking joint and several damages caused by the pollution of the El Muña reservoir by pumping of polluted water from the Bogotá river by Emgesa S.A. ESP.Emgesa responded that it is not liable for these damages, arguing, among other things, that it receives already polluted water. The initial amount claimed by the plaintiffs was $ 3,000,000,000 thousands of Colombian pesos, which is equivalent to approximately US$ 1,568.21 million. Emgesa S.A. ESP. petitioned to have approximately 60 public and private entities that discharge into the Bogotá River and that have responsibility for the environmental management of this river basin to be brought into the lawsuit. Therefore, the case file (expediente) was sent to the State Council (Consejo de Estado) and the public and private entities have filed petitions in opposition. In June of 2010 the parties were notified of a motion filed by one of the plaintiffs that seeks to declare the Cundinamarca Administrative Courts rulings for the period after August 1, 2006 null and void. This request is based on the argument that the court lacks jurisdiction over this proceeding and the Administrative Circuit Courts are the relevant courts to hear class actions. This proceeding is expecting ruling.
7. In 2001, the tax authority in Peru, SUNAT, issued certain tax and penalty resolutions questioning the depreciation of Edegels revalued assets. In January of 2002, Edegel filed a petition (recurso de reclamación) against these resolutions, which was declared without merit by the SUNAT. Edegel filed an appeal before the Tribunal Fiscal de la Nación (National Tax Tribunal), which ruled in favor of Edegel in 2004, confirming (i) Edegels right to depreciate the greater value of the asset based on the fact that Edegel had an agreement for legal stability (convenio de estabilidad juridica), and (ii) the non-application of Rule VIII of the Internal Revenue Code as there was no fraud. The resolution
provided that SUNAT must ensure that the revaluation of the assets was not done at an amount greater than market value. From that date, Edegel has received several notices from SUNAT for determination of the revaluation surplus and the tax amount owed. In January 2006, a complaint and appeal were filed against the resolution of SUNAT before the Tribunal Fiscal de la Nación, the ruling of which is pending. The amount of these claims equals approximately US$ 45.43 million.
8. Through resolutions 506 dated March 28, 2005 and 1189 dated July 8, 2005, the Regional Autonomous Corporation of Cundinamarca (CAR) ordered Emgesa S.A. ESP, EEB and Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Bogotá to complete work at the El Muña reservoir. The effectiveness of the water concession granted to EMGESA depends, among other conditions, upon the completion of such work. The value of these works amounts to approximately US$ 50 million. Emgesa S.A. ESP has filed before the Administrative Court of Cundinamarca, First Section (Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Sección Primera) a petition for annulment and reinstatement of rights against such resolutions. In addition, a petition for annulment and reinstatement of rights has also been filed against the CAR Resolution 849 related to the decontamination of the Tominé reservoir which feeds the Bogotá River, which in turn feeds the El Muña reservoir. CAR Resolutions 506 and 1189 have already been notified and responded to by the CAR as the defendant; the trial stage is pending. In the case of Resolution CAR 849 related to the petition for the annulment and reinstatement of rights, the evidentiary stage has been completed, and the parties are expecting to present their final arguments before judgment is rendered. The amount involved in these proceedings is US$ 90 million.
b) Outstanding lawsuits involving Associates:
Endesa Brasil and Subsidiaries:
1. Meridional Servicios, Emprendimientos y Participaciones (hereinafter, Meridional) is a company whose only asset are the rights derived from litigation that it acquired from the construction companies Mistral and CIVEL, which had entered into a contract with Centrais Elétricas Fluminense S.A. (CELF) for the construction of civil works. This contract was cancelled by CELF prior to the privatization, that gave rise to the Brazilian distribution associate called AMPLA. Since CELFs assets were transferred to Ampla in the privatization process, in 1998 Meridional sued Ampla, alleging that such assets were transferred in violation of Meridionals rights. It should be pointed out that Ampla only acquired assets from CELF, but it is not CELFs legal successor, because CELF, a State-run company, continues to exist as a separate legal entity. The plaintiff seeks payment of outstanding invoices and contractual damages arising from the cancellation of the contract for construction of civil works. The lower court ruling was in favor of Ampla and appealed by the plaintiff, which was granted. AMPLA filed new appeal with the purpose of annulling such decision which was accepted and as result, all decisions made in relation to this proceeding since April 2009 were annulled. In December 2009, Meridionals appeal was amended maintaining the first ruling in favor of AMPLA and the State of Río de Janeiro. This decision was contested by Meridional through appeal which was declared inadmissible in February 2010. Since May 2010, Meridional has filed different proceedings all of which have been declared to be inadmissible or denied; in addition, Meridional has received fines because it has been deemed to present unsupported proceedings that cause delays. In July 2010, Meridional filed new requests that were not accepted. As a result, Meridional filed a petition which was not accepted; in addition, the Court Secretary was ordered not to receive new requests made by Meridional as well as to issue a certificate called trânsito em julgado (res judicata). As a result of this decision, on September 13, 2010, Meridional filed a new petition mandado de segurança (injunction). The amount involved in this lawsuit is estimated at US$ 430.31 million.
2. In October, 2009 Tractebel Energía S.A. sued CIEN, a Brazilian generation associate, for alleged failure to perform the agreement Purchase and Sale of 300 MW of firm capacity with associated energy from Argentina (Contrato de Compra y Venta de 300 MW de Potencia firme con energia asociada proveniente de Argentina) entered into on October 20, 1999 by and between CIEN and Centrais Geradoras do Sul do Brasil S.A (Gerasul currently, Tractebel Energia S.A.). Tractebel Energia S.A. is asking the court to order CIEN to pay a penalty of R$ 117,666,976.00 (US$ 70.88 millions) plus other fines, for non-availability of firm capacity and associated energy, and it asks the court to determine those other fines in the enforcement of the judgment. Non-performance by CIEN was alleged to occur because of the failure of CIEN to guarantee to Tractebel the availability of the firm energy power capacity that was contractually guaranteed to Tractebel, which would allegedly have occurred since March of 2005. In November 2009 CIEN answered the lawsuit, arguing that the non-availability of energy was caused by the Argentine crisis, since Argentine is the country from which CIEN imports all the energy that it delivers, when needed, to Tractebel Energia S.A. The defendant also alleges that the Argentine crisis was an unexpected event, for which CIEN has no responsibility, and that this situation was even acknowledged by the Brazilian authorities of that period. The lawsuit is in the lower court and at initial stage. On September 1, 2010, the lawsuit was sent to the judge for him to decide whether to grant a motion (despacho saneador) to conclude the parties pleadings and initiate the investigation/production of evidence).
3. Lawsuit filed by Furnas Centrais Eletricas S.A. (Furnas) and notified on June 15, 2010 based on alleged breach of CIENs power purchase Agreement N° 12,399 for the purchase of 700MW of capacity with energy originating from Argentina. Under the agreement, which was signed on May 5, 1998, CIEN commits itself to purchase energy from the Argentinas electricity wholesale market (Mercado Eléctrico Mayorista de la República Argentina hereinafter MEM) and transport it from the Argentine electric system (Sistema Eléctrico Argentino) to the Brazilian transmission interconnection system (Sistema de Transmissao de Interligacao) at the Itá substation. The contract has a 20 year term effective June 21, 2000. On April 11, 2005, CIEN informed Furnas that it will not be able to fulfill the agreement due to events beyond its control, regarded as force majeure. On April 14, 2005, Furnas notified CIEN that it would reject CIENs force majeure claim. Furnas is requesting the courts order CIEN to pay a R$ 520,280,659 (US$313.42 million) fine contemplated in the contract in case of rescission, as adjusted plus interest from the date of filing of the claim until actual payment, as well as other penalties based on the lack of availability of the contracted capacity, and other charges to be determined upon the issuance of the final verdict. CIEN replied in July of 2010 and Furnas answered in August of 2010. In October 2010, the parties proposed the courts the production of additional documentary proof without any need at this time to specify what documents would be presented, which will occur during a future phase.
4. In December, 2001 the article of the Federal Constitution, on which AMPLA, our Brazilian distribution associate, relied to argue it was not required to pay certain taxes (COFINS) and pursuant to which AMPLA did not pay tax, was amended. There is an article of the Constitution stating that legislative changes come into force 90 days after their publication. Based on that, AMPLA began to pay the COFINS only as of April, 2002. However, the Brazilian Tax Authorities argue that this article of the Constitution only applies to changes in laws, but not to the Constitution itself, whose changes come into force immediately. Furthermore, the Tax Authorities argue that, by reason of the change in AMPLAs tax status (earned to accrued) the taxable amount of the COFINS increased during the first semester of 2002. Notice was given of the proceedings in July 2003. The first appealable decision was decided against AMPLA and it filed an appeal in October, 2003. In November, 2007, the appeal was ruled on by the Court of Appeal and the decision was partly favorable to the Treasury in terms of the period in which a change in the Constitution comes into force and partly favorable to AMPLA in terms of the change in the tax status from earned to accrued. In April, 2008, the Ministry of the Treasury filed an appeal against this decision in the Higher Court of Appeal. In October, 2008, AMPLA filed its answer to the
appeal and also filed an appeal with the Higher Court to attempt to change that part of the decision that was not favorable to AMPLA. In May, 2009, the Federal Treasury (Hacienda Pública Federal) applied interest to the fine imposed. This new interest arises from an internal administrative act (addressed to the tax authorities but for general application) of the tax authorities and has started to be applied uniformly by the Federal Treasury (SRF). The interest on the fine has been calculated by applying the Selic (Special System of Liquidation and Custody: an adjustment index set by the federal government based on the referential interest rate of the Brazilian Central Bank), as of the month after receiving the Record of Infringement. Consequently, since the Record was received in July, 2003, the Selic corresponds to the interest accumulated as of August 2003, which is 81.42%. In August, 2009, AMPLA was notified that the Special Appeal filed by the company had not been admitted to be heard. AMPLA filed another appeal against this resolution with the President of the Higher Court for Tax Issues. The purpose of this appeal is for the Special Appeal to be received. Both appeals are pending resolution. The amount involved is US$ 95.63 million.
5. In 1998, our Brazilian distribution subsidiary Ampla issued FRNs (bonds) for US$350 million maturing in 2008 in order to finance its investment in Coelce. Such bonds were purchased by Cerj Overseas (a foreign subsidiary of Ampla). The bonds had a special tax treatment according to which no withholding tax (15% or 25%) would be applied to payments of interest abroad, provided that, among other requirements, there was no advanced amortization before the average 96 month amortization deadline. Cerj Overseas obtained financing through a 6-month loan outside Brazil to acquire the bonds. At the end of that period (October 1998), due to problems in obtaining other sources of financing, Cerj Overseas had to obtain re-financing from Ampla, which provided Cerj Overseas with loans in reales. The Brazilian tax authorities argue that the special tax treatment was lost in 1998 because the loans in reales made by Ampla to Cerj Overseas were the equivalent of an advanced amortization of the debt before the 96 month amortization deadline. A Record of Infringement was notified in July 2005. In August, 2005, Ampla filed an appeal with the lower administrative court of appeal and such appeal was rejected. In April 2006, an appeal was filed with the Council of Taxpayers, the intermediate administrative court (Consejo de Contribuyentes). In December, 2007, the Council of Taxpayers ruled completely in favor of Ampla. In January of 2010, Ampla was notified of this favorable decision by the Council of Taxpayers as well as the appeal filed by Hacienda Pública. In February 2010, Ampla presented its arguments against the appeal filed by the tax authorities. The amount of this lawsuit is US$430.35 million.
6. In 2002, the State of Rio de Janeiro (RJ) issued a decree stipulating that the ICMS should be calculated and paid on the 10th, 20th, and 30th days of the same month of the accrual. Due to cash problems, our Brazilian distribution subsidiary Ampla continued to pay the ICMS in accordance with the previous system (payment on the 5th of the month following its accrual). In October 2004, and notwithstanding the existence of an informal agreement with RJ and two separate amnesty laws, RJ notified Ampla of a resolution to collect a fine on late payments. Such resolution was appealed by Ampla in that same year. In February 2007, Ampla was notified of the administrative decision that ratified the fine imposed by RJ. In March 2007, Ampla filed an appeal with the Council of Taxpayers, the intermediate administrative court (Consejo de Contribuyentes). Ampla obtained a temporary ruling (liminar) in its favor, allowing it to file the appeal without the need to make a deposit or post a bond to guarantee 30% of the adjusted amount of the fine. On August 26, 2010, Ampla received notification that the Council of Taxpayers decided against it. Afterwards, on September 1, 2010, Ampla presented a new appeal to the Full Council (Consejo Pleno, special body of the Council of Taxpayers) to reverse the decision of the Council of Taxpayers. Ampla is currently awaiting the decision from the Full Council. The amount of the lawsuit is US$ 97.67 million.
7. Towards the end of 2002, our Brazilian generating associate CGTF filed a petition against the Federal Union seeking to classify the goods imported for the turbo-generator units as corresponding to the item Other Generating Sets, in order to be able to avail itself of the 0% rate for Import Tax (II) and for the Tax on Industrialized Products (IPI). The Federal Union argues that the imported goods do not correspond to Other Generating Sets. CGTF obtained an incidental resolution in its favor allowing it to clear the goods through customs with a 0% rate, subject to a prior judicial deposit of R$ 56 million (US$ 35.72 million, updated at July, 2009). Also, to avoid expiration of the taxes, the Brazilian federal tax authorities issued a record of tax enforcement that was suspended until the pending lawsuit against the Federal Union is resolved. Regarding the lawsuit, in September 2008, the lower court issued a ruling favorable to CGTF. In May 2010, the Regional Federal Court (Tribunal Regional Federal) also ruled in favor of CGTF thereby confirming the decision of the lower court in favor of CGTF and rejecting the appeal filed by the Brazilian tax authorities, classifying CGTFs goods within the tax concept of Other Generating Sets. This decision became final as the Brazilian tax authorities did not file any appeal with the superior courts. In September 2009, the temporary resolution that allowed CGTF to clear the goods through customs with a 0% tax rate subject to a legal deposit was confirmed. In November 2009, the Brazilian tax authorities presented a special petition (embargos de declaracion) against such resolution which was resolved in favor of CGTF. In March 2010, the Brazilian tax authorities filed a special petition against such decision in the Supreme Court of Justice in Brazilia. The amount involved is US$ 43.92 million.
Endesa Chiles Management considers that the provisions recorded in the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position adequately cover the risks for the lawsuits and other transactions detailed in this note and, therefore, they do not expect any additional liabilities to arise.
Given the characteristics of the risks covered by these provisions, the company is unable to determine a reasonable timeframe for the dates of any payments that may be required.
21. PROVISIONS FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Endesa Chile and some of its Chilean and Colombian subsidiaries grant different post-employment benefit plans to all or part of its active or retired employees, which are determined and recorded in the financial statements based on the criteria described in Note 3.j.1. These benefits refer principally to:
Defined benefit plans:
Complementary pension: The beneficiary is entitled to receive a monthly amount that complements the pension he or she receives from the respective social security system.
Staff severance indemnity: The beneficiary receives a certain number of contractual monthly salaries upon retirement. This benefit is applicable once the employee has provided a minimum number of years of service which, depending on the company, ranges from five to fifteen years.
Electricity supply: The beneficiary receives a monthly bonus that covers a portion of its household electricity consumption.
Health benefits: The beneficiary receives coverage in addition to that provided by the social security system.
21.2 Details, movements and financial statement presentation
a) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of post-employment obligations for defined benefits is summarized as follows:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Post-employment obligations |
|
31,356,333 |
|
31,679,864 |
|
Total |
|
31,356,333 |
|
31,679,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
2,703,107 |
|
3,448,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion |
|
28,653,226 |
|
28,231,131 |
|
b) The rollforward of the post-employment obligation for years 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Actuarial value of post-employment obligations |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
33,473,278 |
|
Current service cost |
|
1,010,135 |
|
Interest cost |
|
3,014,451 |
|
Actuarial (gains) losses |
|
1,425,917 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
(2,990,595 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
(4,253,322 |
) |
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
31,679,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
835,504 |
|
Interest cost |
|
2,693,816 |
|
Contributions by plant participants |
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses |
|
938,426 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
(384,933 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
(4,402,927 |
) |
Employee transfer |
|
(3,417 |
) |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
31,356,333 |
|
As of December 31, 2010, of the total actuarial liability, 37% corresponds to defined-benefit commitments granted by Chilean companies (36% as of December 31, 2009) and 63% to defined-benefit commitments granted by our Colombian subsidiary Emgesa (64% as of December 31, 2009).
c) The amounts recorded in consolidated comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
Total Expense Recognized in Statement of |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Current service cost of defined benefit plan |
|
835,504 |
|
1,010,135 |
|
391,527 |
|
Interest cost of defined benefit plan |
|
2,693,816 |
|
3,014,451 |
|
2,619,725 |
|
Total expense recognized in income statement |
|
3,529,320 |
|
4,024,586 |
|
3,011,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial gains and losses |
|
938,426 |
|
1,425,917 |
|
1,770,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense recognized in statement of comprehensive income |
|
4,467,746 |
|
5,450,503 |
|
4,781,612 |
|
Actuarial hypothesis:
The following hypothesis was used for the actuarial calculation of defined benefit plans as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
Chile |
|
Colombia |
| ||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
Discount rates used |
|
6.5% |
|
6.5% |
|
9.52% |
|
11.59% |
|
Expected rate of salary increases |
|
3.0% |
|
3.0% |
|
4.80% |
|
6.48% |
|
Mortality tables |
|
RV 2004/ RV 85 / RV-04 |
|
RV 2004/ RV 85 / RV-04 |
|
RV 2008 |
|
ISS 1980 -1989 |
|
Sensitivity:
As of December 31, 2010, the sensitivity of the value of the actuarial liability for post-employment benefits to variations of 100 basis points in the discount rate assumes a decrease of ThCh$ 2,311,399 (ThCh$ 2,525,322 as of December 31, 2009) if the rate rises and an increase of ThCh$ 2,816,948 (ThCh$ 2,175,461 as of December 31, 2009) if the rate falls.
Future disbursements:
Based on available estimates, forecasted disbursements for defined benefit plans over the next 12 months amount to ThCh$ 2,703,107.
Defined Contributions
Contributions made to defined contribution plans are recorded directly in personnel expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Amounts recorded for this concept as of December 31, 2010 totaled ThCh$ 318,953 (ThCh$ 326,655 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and ThCh$ 286,511 for the year ended December 31, 2008).
22.1. Equity attributable to the parent companys owners
22.1.1. Subscribed and paid capital and number of shares
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 Endesa Chiles share capital amounts to ThCh$ 1,331,714,085, represented by 8,201,754,580 fully subscribed and paid par value shares that are listed on the following exchanges: Santiago Stock Exchange, Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange, Valparaíso Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Latin American Securities Exchange of the Madrid Stock Exchange (LATIBEX). These figures have not experienced any changes during 2010 and 2009.
Share premium relates to premium on the placement prices of the shares issued in 1986 and 1994 for a total of ThCh$ 206,008,557.
At the Board of Directors held on March 26, 2009, the Directors agreed to propose at the Ordinary Shareholders meeting the payment of a final dividend equivalent to 40.00% of the net income for 2008, that is, Ch$ 15.9330 per share.
This proposal changed the Dividend Policy for 2008 which established the payment of a final dividend equivalent to 60% of the net income; this was reported as a material Event on March 26, 2009. Notwithstanding this change, the final dividend proposed is the highest in the Companys history and represents a growth of 55% compared to the prior year.
At the ordinary meeting held on February 26, 2010, the Board of Directors agreed to propose at the Ordinary Shareholders meeting to be held on April 22, 2010, the payment of a final dividend equivalent to 35.11% of the net income for 2009, that is, Ch$ 26.84285 per share.
This proposal changed the Dividend Policy for 2009 which established the payment of a final dividend equivalent to 60% of the net income; this was reported as a material Event on February 26, 2010. At the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 22, 2010, it was agreed to pay the minimum mandatory dividend along with an additional dividend of Ch$ 26.84285 per share. This dividend was partially paid during 2009 (Provisional Dividend No. 47) and the remaining balance of Ch$ 17.53050 per share was paid on May 5, 2010 (Final Dividend No. 48).
At the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting of Endesa Chile held on April 22, 2010, shareholders approved as the Companys dividend policy, which is expected to be complied with in 2010, the payment of a final dividend equivalent to 60% of the net income for 2010. In addition, the Company also intends to pay a provisional dividend equivalent to 15% of the net income as of September 30, 2010 as a debit to the net income for 2010. This dividend would to be paid in December 2010.
At the Board meeting held on October 27, 2010, it was agreed to change in advance the Dividend Policy for 2010. This change states that the payment date of the provisional dividend changes from December 2010 to January 2011. The final dividend for the year 2010 is defined by shareholders during 2011.
Compliance with the aforementioned dividend policy will be conditional upon net income actually obtained, as well as periodic earnings projections issued by the company or the existence of certain conditions, as appropriate.
Here in is a detail of dividends paid in the last years:
Dividend No. |
|
Type of |
|
Date of Payment |
|
Pesos per |
|
Charged to |
|
38 |
|
Final |
|
04-05-2004 |
|
2.30000 |
|
2003 |
|
39 |
|
Final |
|
04-18-2005 |
|
4.13000 |
|
2004 |
|
40 |
|
Final |
|
03-30-2006 |
|
5.82000 |
|
2005 |
|
41 |
|
Interim |
|
12-22-2006 |
|
2.57000 |
|
2006 |
|
42 |
|
Final |
|
05-22-2007 |
|
10.84000 |
|
2006 |
|
43 |
|
Interim |
|
12-26-2007 |
|
2.19260 |
|
2007 |
|
44 |
|
Final |
|
04-29-2008 |
|
11.56470 |
|
2007 |
|
45 |
|
Interim |
|
12-18-2008 |
|
5.35120 |
|
2008 |
|
46 |
|
Final |
|
05-11-2009 |
|
15.9330 |
|
2008 |
|
47 |
|
Interim |
|
12-16-2009 |
|
9.31240 |
|
2009 |
|
48 |
|
Final |
|
05-05-2010 |
|
17.53050 |
|
2009 |
|
22.2. Foreign currency translation.
The following table details translation adjustments net of taxes in the consolidated statement of financial position and the consolidated statement of change in equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
64,784,849 |
|
67,512,250 |
|
103,890,827 |
|
Generandes Perú S.A. |
|
15,363,568 |
|
29,786,290 |
|
52,423,436 |
|
Gasatacama S.A. |
|
(19,072,259 |
) |
(11,945,010 |
) |
22,137,001 |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
(6,362,587 |
) |
(3,704,706 |
) |
3,783,724 |
|
Endesa Argentina S.A. |
|
(11,659,258 |
) |
(5,629,151 |
) |
11,807,449 |
|
Hidroelectrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
(14,257,586 |
) |
(12,645,350 |
) |
(7,647,814 |
) |
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
(8,071,149 |
) |
9,550,237 |
|
(15,086,214 |
) |
Other |
|
(877,618 |
) |
103,403 |
|
(112,536 |
) |
TOTAL |
|
19,847,960 |
|
73,027,963 |
|
171,195,873 |
|
The Companys capital management objective is to maintain adequate capitalization levels that will ensure its access to financial markets in order to develop its medium and long-term goals, thus optimizing shareholders return and maintaining a solid financial position.
22.4. Restrictions on the disposal of subsidiary funds.
Certain Company subsidiaries have to comply with some financial ratios and/or covenants which require maintaining a minimum level of equity or contain other restrictions that restrict the ability to transfer or dispose of assets. The Companys share of restricted net assets at December 31, 2010 pertaining to the subsidiaries Edegel and Hidroeléctrica el Chocón S.A. amount to ThCh$ 118,127,232 and ThCh$ 59,398,201, respectively.
At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the nature and balance of other reserves is as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Movement |
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Foreign currency translation differences |
|
73,027,963 |
|
(53,180,003 |
) |
19,847,960 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
79,113,232 |
|
25,086,784 |
|
104,200,016 |
|
Remeasurement of available for sale financial assets |
|
50,090 |
|
(697 |
) |
49,393 |
|
Other reserves |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
|
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
TOTAL |
|
(575,456,324 |
) |
(28,093,916 |
) |
(603,550,240 |
) |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Movement |
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Foreign currency translation differences |
|
171,195,873 |
|
(98,167,910 |
) |
73,027,963 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
(96,826,564 |
) |
175,939,796 |
|
79,113,232 |
|
Remeasurement of available for sale financial assets |
|
4,299 |
|
45,791 |
|
50,090 |
|
Other reserves |
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
|
|
(727,647,609 |
) |
TOTAL |
|
(653,274,001 |
) |
77,817,677 |
|
(575,456,324 |
) |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Movement 2008 |
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Foreign currency translation differences |
|
84,113,627 |
|
87,082,246 |
|
171,195,873 |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
169,086,413 |
|
(265,912,977 |
) |
(96,826,564 |
) |
Remeasurement of available for sale financial assets |
|
4,345 |
|
(46 |
) |
4,299 |
|
Other reserves |
|
(578,428,489 |
) |
(149,219,120 |
) |
(727,647,609 |
) |
TOTAL |
|
(325,224,104 |
) |
(328,049,897 |
) |
(653,274,001 |
) |
· Foreign currency translation differences: This reserve is used to record the currency translation effects that arise from the following:
· Conversion of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the Chilean peso (Note 2.5.3), and
· Valuation of goodwill originating from business acquisitions of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the Chilean peso (Note 3.c).
· Cash Flow Headge: Represent the effective portion of instruments of transactions designated as cash flow hedges (see Note 3.f.4).
· Remediation of financial assets available for sale: Represent variations in fair value net of the tax effect of investments available for sale. (Note 3.f.1).
· Miscellaneous other reserves:
These reserves correspond mostly to the following:
I. In conformity with the provisions of Circular No. 456 of the Chilean Superintendence of Securities and Insurance, this heading includes the price-level adjustment over paid-in capital accumulated between the date of transition to IFRS (January 1, 2004) and December 31, 2008.
It is important to note that although the Company adopted IFRS for statutory accounting standard at January 1, 2009, the date of transition to IFRS is the same than as applied by the parent Endesa S.A., that is, January 1, 2004. This relates to the application of the exemption included for these purposes in IFRS 1, First Time Adoption.
II. Conversion differences existing at the date of transition to IFRS (IFRS 1 exemption First Time Adoption).
III. Effects resulting from business combinations under common control, due mainly to the creation of the Endesa Brasil Holding in 2005 and the merger of the Colombian subsidiaries Emgesa and Betania in 2007.
22.6. Non-controlling interests.
The principal fluctuations on Non-controlling interests during years 2010 and 2009 are explained as follows:
a) On October 9, 2009, in a market transaction on the Lima Stock Exchange (Peru), Endesa Chile acquired an additional 29.3974% interest on Edegel S.A.A., for a total of ThCh$ 208,922,322 (US$ 375 million). This acquisition resulted in a decrease of minority interest of ThCh$ 127,551,963.
It is important to highlight that this acquisition was approved by the Companys Board of Directors after their review of external valuations prepared by hired investment banks and internal valuations prepared by Management. The shares were acquired from the Peruvian company Generalima S.A.C., a subsidiary of Endesa Latinoamérica S.A.U., which is a related party to Enersis.
b) In addition, the negative variation in the Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes in the statement of changes in equity, is due mainly to the following:
i) The portion of non-controlling interests in the dividends declared by the consolidated companies; and
ii) The proportion of non-controlling interests in the capital reduction performed by the subsidiary Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. The balance received by non-controlling interests is of ThCh$ 85,231,132 as of December 31, 2010 (ThCh$ 0 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008).
This account as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Revenue |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Energy sales |
|
2,341,244,481 |
|
2,346,027,026 |
|
2,441,009,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sales |
|
21,964,060 |
|
12,085,420 |
|
20,557,959 |
|
Sales of products and services |
|
21,964,060 |
|
12,085,420 |
|
20,557,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other services provided |
|
34,735,986 |
|
48,255,332 |
|
69,994,574 |
|
Tolls and transmission |
|
5,117,650 |
|
3,969,935 |
|
30,849,477 |
|
Lease of measurement equipment |
|
2,478,737 |
|
43,947 |
|
2,631,060 |
|
Engineering services |
|
15,871,319 |
|
19,960,120 |
|
14,948,168 |
|
Other services |
|
11,268,280 |
|
24,281,330 |
|
21,565,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
2,397,944,527 |
|
2,406,367,778 |
|
2,531,561,947 |
|
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Other Operating Income |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Other Income (1) |
|
37,437,927 |
|
12,551,577 |
|
4,826,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Operating Income |
|
37,437,927 |
|
12,551,577 |
|
4,826,492 |
|
(1) During the current year, the Company has recognized Ch$ 22,226 million in relation to the activation of insurance policies covering the business disruption at the Bocamina Power Plant as a result of the earthquake occurred in Chile on February 27, 2010. See Note 14.f6.
24. RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLE USED.
This account as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Raw materials and consumable used |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Energy purchased |
|
(236,937,399 |
) |
(164,312,507 |
) |
(224,432,412 |
) |
Cost fuel consumed |
|
(634,777,206 |
) |
(587,063,935 |
) |
(845,936,200 |
) |
Transportation costs |
|
(228,036,184 |
) |
(173,035,230 |
) |
(187,324,624 |
) |
Other variable supplies and services |
|
(91,577,030 |
) |
(51,734,217 |
) |
(46,759,899 |
) |
Total |
|
(1,191,327,819 |
) |
(976,145,889 |
) |
(1,304,453,135 |
) |
25. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EXPENSES.
This account as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Employee benefits expenses |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Salaries and wages |
|
(74,105,329 |
) |
(69,416,433 |
) |
(60,538,558 |
) |
Post-employment benefit obligation expense |
|
(1,154,457 |
) |
(1,336,790 |
) |
(678,038 |
) |
Social security service and other social charges |
|
(4,697,420 |
) |
(4,686,196 |
) |
(2,495,872 |
) |
Other personnel expenses |
|
(109,143 |
) |
(124,903 |
) |
(87,321 |
) |
Total |
|
(80,066,349 |
) |
(75,564,322 |
) |
(63,799,789 |
) |
26. DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION AND IMPAIRMENT LOSSES
This account as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Depreciation |
|
(175,067,904 |
) |
(192,772,740 |
) |
(182,631,235 |
) |
Amortization |
|
(3,939,996 |
) |
(3,369,335 |
) |
(3,973,340 |
) |
Impairment losses financial assets |
|
(308,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses fixes assets |
|
(397,857 |
) |
(43,999,600 |
) |
|
|
Total |
|
(179,714,025 |
) |
(240,141,675 |
) |
(186,604,575 |
) |
This account as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods is detailed as follows:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Other expenses |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Independent professional services and outsourced |
|
(28,168,817 |
) |
(25,687,929 |
) |
(25,303,722 |
) |
Other supplies and services |
|
(22,480,182 |
) |
(23,370,588 |
) |
(28,456,360 |
) |
Insurance premiums |
|
(14,229,231 |
) |
(12,682,484 |
) |
(9,233,688 |
) |
Other tax and tariffs |
|
(10,821,134 |
) |
(19,124,384 |
) |
(17,006,971 |
) |
Repair and maintenance |
|
(10,916,194 |
) |
(13,136,995 |
) |
(12,923,921 |
) |
Marketing, public relations and advertising |
|
(5,273,660 |
) |
(3,229,232 |
) |
(2,323,937 |
) |
Lease and rental cost |
|
(3,350,773 |
) |
(3,029,391 |
) |
(2,910,420 |
) |
Environmental expenses |
|
(812,294 |
) |
(4,516,426 |
) |
(3,713,697 |
) |
Other supplies |
|
(2,052,353 |
) |
(2,350,841 |
) |
(2,298,270 |
) |
Travel expenses |
|
(546,330 |
) |
(596,780 |
) |
(1,538,129 |
) |
Compensations and fines |
|
(151,193 |
) |
(571,999 |
) |
(135,005 |
) |
Other |
|
(4,875,095 |
) |
(2,571,730 |
) |
(2,023,595 |
) |
Total |
|
(103,677,256 |
) |
(110,868,779 |
) |
(107,867,715 |
) |
28. FINANCE INCOME AND FINANCE COSTS.
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, this caption is comprised of the following:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Financial income |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
4,716,032 |
|
19,525,214 |
|
19,801,293 |
|
Other finance income |
|
5,367,158 |
|
5,790,704 |
|
14,521,941 |
|
Total financial income |
|
10,083,190 |
|
25,315,918 |
|
34,323,234 |
|
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Financial Costs |
|
(142,256,150 |
) |
(188,368,384 |
) |
(198,439,587 |
) |
Bank loans |
|
(27,969,118 |
) |
(44,385,051 |
) |
(45,642,179 |
) |
Secured and unsecured liabilities |
|
(96,485,135 |
) |
(110,024,240 |
) |
(131,462,656 |
) |
Capital leases |
|
(2,735,638 |
) |
(3,666,191 |
) |
(4,693,442 |
) |
Valuation of financial derivatives |
|
(9,733,581 |
) |
(4,255,054 |
) |
(726,687 |
) |
Post-employment benefit obligation expenses |
|
(2,693,816 |
) |
(3,014,451 |
) |
(2,619,725 |
) |
Capitalized finance expenses |
|
11,744,123 |
|
4,745,501 |
|
4,331,965 |
|
Other |
|
(14,382,985 |
) |
(27,768,898 |
) |
(17,626,863 |
) |
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
(3,162,695 |
) |
9,275,308 |
|
(18,950,333 |
) |
Foreign Currency Exchange differences, Net |
|
15,618,964 |
|
(17,017,325 |
) |
(5,828,382 |
) |
Positive |
|
33,103,786 |
|
28,293,419 |
|
42,213,637 |
|
Negative |
|
(17,484,822 |
) |
(45,310,744 |
) |
(48,042,019 |
) |
Total Financial Costs |
|
(129,799,881 |
) |
(196,110,401 |
) |
(223,218,302 |
) |
Total Financial Results |
|
(119,716,691 |
) |
(170,794,483 |
) |
(188,895,068 |
) |
Income tax as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods are detailed here in. Also, the following table reconciles income taxes resulting from applying the general current tax rate to Net income before taxes to the income tax expense recorded in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income for 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Income Tax (Expense) Income |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Current Tax Expense |
|
(207,480,995 |
) |
(230,226,472 |
) |
(142,840,577 |
) |
Tax benefit effect from tax assets not previously recognized |
|
24,136,350 |
|
12,155,622 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to Current Tax of Prior Period |
|
583,493 |
|
(13,231,189 |
) |
(2,588,205 |
) |
Other Current Tax Expense |
|
(2,577,120 |
) |
(2,799,433 |
) |
(6,486,004 |
) |
Current Tax Expense, Net, Total |
|
(185,338,272 |
) |
(234,101,472 |
) |
(151,914,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Expense (Income) Relating to Origination and Reversal of Temporary Differences |
|
949,761 |
|
48,513,831 |
|
(50,423,200 |
) |
Deferred tax expense (income) related to changes in the tax rate or new rates |
|
(2,556,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit effect from tax assets not previously recognized |
|
|
|
1,700,625 |
|
|
|
Other Deferred Tax Income (Expense) |
|
6,980,605 |
|
11,418,720 |
|
(7,839,619 |
) |
Deferred Tax Income (Expense), Net, Total |
|
5,374,080 |
|
61,633,176 |
|
(58,262,819 |
) |
Income Tax Expense |
|
(179,964,192 |
) |
(172,468,296 |
) |
(210,177,605 |
) |
The main temporary diferences are detailed in the Note 15.a.
Reconciliation of Tax Expense Using Statutory Rate with Tax |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Tax expense using statutory rate |
|
(147,224,220 |
) |
(160,576,672 |
) |
(130,510,434 |
) |
Tax effect of rates in other jurisdictions |
|
(53,463,847 |
) |
(44,211,383 |
) |
(35,674,678 |
) |
Tax effect of non-taxable revenues |
|
21,617,417 |
|
10,333,820 |
|
21,915,058 |
|
Tax effect of non-tax-deductible expenses |
|
(12,807,498 |
) |
(7,419,887 |
) |
(13,507,757 |
) |
Effect of tax credit on assets not previously recognized |
|
|
|
2,499,071 |
|
|
|
Tax effect of change in tax rates |
|
(2,556,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax effect from under or over provided tax in prior periods |
|
583,493 |
|
(7,359,691 |
) |
(2,588,205 |
) |
Price-level restatement for tax purposes (investments and equity) |
|
13,886,749 |
|
34,266,446 |
|
(49,811,589 |
) |
Total adjustments to tax expense using statutory rate |
|
(32,739,972 |
) |
(11,891,624 |
) |
(79,667,171 |
) |
Income Tax |
|
(179,964,192 |
) |
(172,468,296 |
) |
(210,177,605 |
) |
On July 29, 2010, Law No. 20,455 was enacted in Chile. This law modifies several legislations with the purpose of obtaining resources intended to finance the countrys reconstruction and was published in the Official Gazette on July 31, 2010. This law establishes, among others, the transitory increase in the income tax rate for commercial years 2011 and 2012 (to 20% and 18.5%, respectively), going back to the current 17% in 2013. As a consequence of these transitory changes, as of December 31, 2010 the Company has recorded a deferred income tax expense of ThCh$ 2,556,286.
Endesa Chile develops commercial activities within two basic business lines: electricity generation and other.
Segment information is also structured geographically by country:
· Chile.
· Argentina.
· Peru.
· Colombia.
As the subsidiaries of Endesa Chile are basically aligned along these two business lines, the segment information presented below is based on the financial information of the companies within each segment.
The following table details this segment information for 2010 and 2009:
Country |
|
Chile |
|
Argentina |
|
Colombia |
|
Peru |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
604,555,951 |
|
546,701,998 |
|
71,156,981 |
|
118,440,168 |
|
154,997,283 |
|
256,813,794 |
|
50,330,357 |
|
54,343,007 |
|
(88,013,849 |
) |
(33,937,725 |
) |
793,026,723 |
|
942,361,242 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
226,577,326 |
|
240,118,710 |
|
18,243,129 |
|
24,084,851 |
|
74,583,887 |
|
160,939,980 |
|
13,865,517 |
|
21,294,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
333,269,859 |
|
446,438,229 |
|
Other current financial assets |
|
17,551 |
|
1,536,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,201 |
|
1,536,149 |
|
Other current non-financial assets |
|
1,165,469 |
|
3,120,114 |
|
2,254,847 |
|
2,376,964 |
|
1,370,458 |
|
1,554,560 |
|
1,835,063 |
|
2,016,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,625,837 |
|
9,068,636 |
|
Trade and other current receivables |
|
234,204,175 |
|
208,095,823 |
|
46,492,629 |
|
85,777,052 |
|
41,680,862 |
|
55,169,859 |
|
11,027,554 |
|
11,073,405 |
|
(82,726,668 |
) |
(28,530,633 |
) |
250,678,552 |
|
331,585,506 |
|
Accounts receivable from related companies |
|
41,296,559 |
|
30,833,174 |
|
2,250,491 |
|
2,228,305 |
|
32,368,651 |
|
32,526,869 |
|
8,403,843 |
|
8,979,580 |
|
(5,287,181 |
) |
(5,407,092 |
) |
79,032,363 |
|
69,160,836 |
|
Inventories |
|
24,443,037 |
|
18,778,149 |
|
1,750,879 |
|
3,803,384 |
|
4,936,465 |
|
6,622,526 |
|
11,009,380 |
|
10,975,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
42,139,761 |
|
40,179,588 |
|
Current tax assets |
|
76,851,834 |
|
44,219,879 |
|
165,006 |
|
169,612 |
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
4,189,000 |
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
81,208,150 |
|
44,392,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
4,035,355,915 |
|
4,041,529,632 |
|
280,496,148 |
|
238,359,902 |
|
1,203,713,202 |
|
1,228,326,578 |
|
730,619,632 |
|
785,935,394 |
|
(1,008,339,815 |
) |
(1,067,160,136 |
) |
5,241,845,082 |
|
5,226,991,370 |
|
Other non-current financial assets |
|
27,935,909 |
|
4,060,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,977 |
|
80,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,295,886 |
|
4,141,795 |
|
Other non-current non-financial assets |
|
169,241 |
|
616,133 |
|
9,603,922 |
|
9,892,989 |
|
1,111,481 |
|
1,092,649 |
|
|
|
336,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,884,644 |
|
11,938,376 |
|
Non-current receivables |
|
1,930,242 |
|
2,674,211 |
|
121,556,759 |
|
61,013,486 |
|
2,974,116 |
|
3,028,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,461,117 |
|
66,716,465 |
|
Non-current accounts receivable from related companies |
|
5,570,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,570,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment accounted for using equity method |
|
1,617,803,876 |
|
1,624,673,392 |
|
4,330,741 |
|
4,698,977 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
49,494,618 |
|
47,596,359 |
|
(1,089,885,888 |
) |
(1,102,872,803 |
) |
581,743,347 |
|
574,097,291 |
|
Intangible assets other than goodwill |
|
23,757,665 |
|
24,887,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,247,206 |
|
17,245,016 |
|
349,639 |
|
506,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
44,354,510 |
|
42,638,575 |
|
Goodwill |
|
12,636 |
|
13,692 |
|
2,453,791 |
|
2,780,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,502,214 |
|
11,050,603 |
|
87,116,665 |
|
91,700,310 |
|
100,085,306 |
|
105,545,382 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
2,328,835,234 |
|
2,362,603,039 |
|
130,831,613 |
|
147,343,811 |
|
1,125,145,217 |
|
1,148,817,647 |
|
669,094,525 |
|
724,212,506 |
|
|
|
(55,987,643 |
) |
4,253,906,589 |
|
4,326,989,360 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
29,340,520 |
|
22,000,720 |
|
11,719,322 |
|
12,629,862 |
|
54,235,182 |
|
58,141,132 |
|
818,659 |
|
2,152,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
96,113,683 |
|
94,924,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
4,639,911,866 |
|
4,588,231,630 |
|
351,653,129 |
|
356,800,070 |
|
1,358,710,485 |
|
1,485,140,372 |
|
780,949,989 |
|
840,278,401 |
|
(1,096,353,664 |
) |
(1,101,097,861 |
) |
6,034,871,805 |
|
6,169,352,612 |
|
Country |
|
Chile |
|
Argentina |
|
Colombia |
|
Peru |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
M$ |
|
M$ |
|
M$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
462,965,283 |
|
647,882,824 |
|
150,318,585 |
|
143,807,722 |
|
286,630,051 |
|
130,634,275 |
|
61,493,965 |
|
71,313,577 |
|
(418,132 |
) |
(12,536,717 |
) |
960,989,752 |
|
981,101,681 |
|
Other current financial liabilities |
|
45,595,637 |
|
191,588,501 |
|
79,751,906 |
|
61,487,491 |
|
87,860,103 |
|
57,137,900 |
|
39,501,048 |
|
38,334,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
252,708,694 |
|
348,548,785 |
|
Trade and other current payables |
|
245,379,701 |
|
295,052,628 |
|
28,901,514 |
|
29,973,620 |
|
86,644,371 |
|
28,526,181 |
|
16,970,251 |
|
20,319,427 |
|
(418,132 |
) |
|
|
377,477,705 |
|
373,871,856 |
|
Accounts payable to related companies |
|
113,936,399 |
|
70,396,317 |
|
28,374,815 |
|
29,954,939 |
|
80,508,993 |
|
2,477,464 |
|
218,586 |
|
262,056 |
|
|
|
(12,536,717 |
) |
223,038,793 |
|
90,554,059 |
|
Other short-term provisions |
|
38,883,784 |
|
29,412,247 |
|
2,553,179 |
|
1,163,928 |
|
22,520 |
|
26,684 |
|
3,097,899 |
|
2,790,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
44,557,382 |
|
33,393,224 |
|
Current tax liabilities |
|
15,109,942 |
|
57,763,208 |
|
10,335,320 |
|
20,817,793 |
|
26,604,320 |
|
37,298,367 |
|
692,609 |
|
8,066,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
52,742,191 |
|
123,945,432 |
|
Current provisions for employee benefits |
|
|
|
367,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,703,107 |
|
3,081,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,703,107 |
|
3,448,733 |
|
Other current non-financial liabilities |
|
4,059,820 |
|
3,302,221 |
|
401,851 |
|
409,951 |
|
2,286,637 |
|
2,086,648 |
|
1,013,572 |
|
1,540,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,761,880 |
|
7,339,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURENT LIABILITIES |
|
1,187,582,184 |
|
1,327,762,291 |
|
104,587,509 |
|
122,228,745 |
|
356,958,221 |
|
424,071,893 |
|
319,926,947 |
|
358,335,279 |
|
|
|
850,871 |
|
1,969,054,861 |
|
2,233,249,079 |
|
Other non-current financial liabilities |
|
960,209,729 |
|
1,102,640,629 |
|
70,465,040 |
|
98,646,588 |
|
339,291,052 |
|
406,377,244 |
|
168,684,276 |
|
200,034,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,538,650,097 |
|
1,807,698,972 |
|
Other non-current payables |
|
3,595,688 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
142,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,738,357 |
|
7,569,739 |
|
Other long-term provisions |
|
9,797,457 |
|
9,246,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
348,770 |
|
430,975 |
|
10,772,286 |
|
10,482,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,918,513 |
|
20,160,585 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
194,971,475 |
|
187,209,772 |
|
11,567,979 |
|
12,848,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
140,470,385 |
|
147,818,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
347,009,839 |
|
347,876,619 |
|
Non-current provisions for employee benefits |
|
11,477,496 |
|
10,967,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,175,730 |
|
17,263,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,653,226 |
|
28,231,131 |
|
Other non-current non-financial liabilities |
|
7,530,339 |
|
10,127,721 |
|
22,554,490 |
|
10,733,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,871 |
|
30,084,829 |
|
21,712,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
2,989,364,399 |
|
2,612,586,515 |
|
96,747,035 |
|
90,763,603 |
|
715,122,213 |
|
930,434,204 |
|
399,529,077 |
|
410,629,545 |
|
(1,095,935,532 |
) |
(1,089,412,015 |
) |
3,104,827,192 |
|
2,955,001,852 |
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
|
2,989,364,399 |
|
2,612,586,515 |
|
96,747,035 |
|
90,763,603 |
|
715,122,213 |
|
930,434,204 |
|
399,529,077 |
|
410,629,545 |
|
(1,095,935,532 |
) |
(1,089,412,015 |
) |
2,376,486,878 |
|
2,069,085,642 |
|
Issued capital |
|
2,071,332,977 |
|
2,053,251,884 |
|
84,324,737 |
|
84,324,737 |
|
142,906,410 |
|
259,460,190 |
|
164,297,758 |
|
164,297,758 |
|
(1,131,147,797 |
) |
(1,229,620,484 |
) |
1,331,714,085 |
|
1,331,714,085 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
1,086,680,565 |
|
1,063,866,422 |
|
9,412,264 |
|
4,731,041 |
|
149,784,385 |
|
138,029,796 |
|
23,141,069 |
|
21,916,044 |
|
173,296,193 |
|
(121,723,979 |
) |
1,442,314,476 |
|
1,106,819,324 |
|
Share premium |
|
206,008,557 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,008,557 |
|
206,008,557 |
|
Other reserves |
|
(374,657,700 |
) |
(710,540,348 |
) |
3,010,034 |
|
1,707,825 |
|
422,431,418 |
|
532,944,218 |
|
212,090,250 |
|
224,415,743 |
|
(138,083,928 |
) |
989,580,057 |
|
(603,550,240 |
) |
(575,456,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728,340,314 |
|
885,916,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
4,639,911,866 |
|
4,588,231,630 |
|
351,653,129 |
|
356,800,070 |
|
1,358,710,485 |
|
1,485,140,372 |
|
780,949,989 |
|
840,278,401 |
|
(1,096,353,664 |
) |
(1,101,097,861 |
) |
6,034,871,805 |
|
6,169,352,612 |
|
Country |
|
Chile |
|
Argentina |
|
Colombia |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
M$ |
|
M$ |
|
M$ |
|
REVENUES |
|
1,365,105,132 |
|
1,408,648,700 |
|
1,642,193,363 |
|
352,358,228 |
|
296,577,889 |
|
284,227,984 |
|
507,515,749 |
|
500,964,413 |
|
401,470,271 |
|
Sales |
|
1,335,157,533 |
|
1,402,468,862 |
|
1,640,570,255 |
|
345,706,935 |
|
293,388,675 |
|
284,077,914 |
|
507,137,563 |
|
500,829,922 |
|
401,257,389 |
|
Energy sales |
|
1,286,727,887 |
|
1,349,609,938 |
|
1,551,765,705 |
|
345,706,935 |
|
293,388,675 |
|
284,077,914 |
|
506,194,881 |
|
500,175,971 |
|
400,576,991 |
|
Other sales |
|
21,964,060 |
|
12,085,420 |
|
20,557,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other services rendered |
|
26,465,586 |
|
40,773,504 |
|
68,246,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942,682 |
|
653,951 |
|
680,398 |
|
Other operating income |
|
29,947,599 |
|
6,179,838 |
|
1,623,108 |
|
6,651,293 |
|
3,189,214 |
|
150,070 |
|
378,186 |
|
134,491 |
|
212,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLE USED |
|
(666,598,837 |
) |
(511,525,081 |
) |
(871,071,579 |
) |
(267,824,397 |
) |
(208,539,466 |
) |
(206,239,901 |
) |
(176,663,972 |
) |
(184,067,482 |
) |
(128,688,480 |
) |
Energy purchases |
|
(139,373,210 |
) |
(52,310,897 |
) |
(134,937,913 |
) |
(9,296,132 |
) |
(9,375,553 |
) |
(12,067,418 |
) |
(72,764,711 |
) |
(91,955,452 |
) |
(47,123,986 |
) |
Fuel consumption |
|
(318,644,651 |
) |
(345,815,766 |
) |
(606,488,766 |
) |
(242,853,893 |
) |
(180,160,003 |
) |
(179,081,276 |
) |
(27,780,401 |
) |
(20,572,023 |
) |
(10,740,338 |
) |
Transport expenses |
|
(161,189,862 |
) |
(107,314,035 |
) |
(122,589,953 |
) |
(3,636,524 |
) |
(5,363,800 |
) |
(4,689,649 |
) |
(50,431,204 |
) |
(46,663,960 |
) |
(45,787,546 |
) |
Other variable supplies and services |
|
(47,391,114 |
) |
(6,084,383 |
) |
(7,054,947 |
) |
(12,037,848 |
) |
(13,640,110 |
) |
(10,401,558 |
) |
(25,687,656 |
) |
(24,876,047 |
) |
(25,036,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN |
|
698,506,295 |
|
897,123,619 |
|
771,121,784 |
|
84,533,831 |
|
88,038,423 |
|
77,988,083 |
|
330,851,777 |
|
316,896,931 |
|
272,781,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other work performed by entity and capitalized |
|
9,438,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,024 |
|
517,847 |
|
330,981 |
|
Employee benefit expenses |
|
(47,481,482 |
) |
(47,297,737 |
) |
(41,412,214 |
) |
(14,203,774 |
) |
(10,769,163 |
) |
(8,817,954 |
) |
(12,219,664 |
) |
(10,959,497 |
) |
(7,918,996 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
(56,347,912 |
) |
(59,936,002 |
) |
(63,058,897 |
) |
(10,468,810 |
) |
(11,675,874 |
) |
(11,200,880 |
) |
(21,201,983 |
) |
(19,127,781 |
) |
(17,815,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS OPERATING RESULTS |
|
604,115,505 |
|
789,889,880 |
|
666,650,673 |
|
59,861,247 |
|
65,593,386 |
|
57,969,249 |
|
298,118,154 |
|
287,327,500 |
|
247,378,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses |
|
(87,465,453 |
) |
(142,769,951 |
) |
(99,126,294 |
) |
(17,458,911 |
) |
(22,642,765 |
) |
(20,684,846 |
) |
(36,580,792 |
) |
(36,516,121 |
) |
(30,560,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
516,650,052 |
|
647,119,929 |
|
567,524,379 |
|
42,402,336 |
|
42,950,621 |
|
37,284,403 |
|
261,537,362 |
|
250,811,379 |
|
216,818,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL RESULTS |
|
(63,512,012 |
) |
(90,259,866 |
) |
(90,806,782 |
) |
(5,959,482 |
) |
(27,712,641 |
) |
(25,609,868 |
) |
(35,915,163 |
) |
(42,513,775 |
) |
(43,391,504 |
) |
Financial income |
|
4,783,075 |
|
9,778,252 |
|
25,601,060 |
|
1,598,337 |
|
2,466,727 |
|
3,173,056 |
|
3,440,657 |
|
11,968,380 |
|
5,364,390 |
|
Financial costs |
|
(70,966,662 |
) |
(91,926,644 |
) |
(120,467,287 |
) |
(16,672,829 |
) |
(16,457,318 |
) |
(13,908,953 |
) |
(39,278,398 |
) |
(54,646,985 |
) |
(48,548,045 |
) |
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
(3,162,695 |
) |
9,275,308 |
|
(18,950,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange differences |
|
5,834,270 |
|
(17,386,782 |
) |
23,009,778 |
|
9,115,010 |
|
(13,722,050 |
) |
(14,873,971 |
) |
(77,422 |
) |
164,830 |
|
(207,849 |
) |
Gains |
|
12,260,890 |
|
28,981,945 |
|
54,434,939 |
|
19,849,580 |
|
1,904,563 |
|
1,406,927 |
|
188,272 |
|
263,663 |
|
128,111 |
|
Losses |
|
(6,426,620 |
) |
(46,368,727 |
) |
(31,425,161 |
) |
(10,734,570 |
) |
(15,626,613 |
) |
(16,280,898 |
) |
(265,694 |
) |
(98,833 |
) |
(335,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the profit (loss) of associate accounted for using the equity method |
|
82,101,109 |
|
88,336,170 |
|
73,631,341 |
|
202,973 |
|
186,494 |
|
363,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) from other investments |
|
272,686 |
|
(55,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,772 |
) |
252,022 |
|
Gains (losses) on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
38,060 |
|
60,233 |
|
654,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,127,732 |
|
83,708 |
|
167,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX |
|
535,549,895 |
|
645,200,972 |
|
551,003,333 |
|
36,645,827 |
|
15,424,474 |
|
12,038,408 |
|
226,749,931 |
|
208,346,540 |
|
173,846,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax |
|
(69,022,643 |
) |
(75,013,447 |
) |
(133,715,307 |
) |
(13,352,066 |
) |
(6,168,376 |
) |
(4,511,350 |
) |
(76,652,558 |
) |
(69,788,953 |
) |
(57,450,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
466,527,252 |
|
570,187,525 |
|
417,288,026 |
|
23,293,761 |
|
9,256,098 |
|
7,527,058 |
|
150,097,373 |
|
138,557,587 |
|
116,395,746 |
|
Net income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
466,527,252 |
|
570,187,525 |
|
417,288,026 |
|
23,293,761 |
|
9,256,098 |
|
7,527,058 |
|
150,097,373 |
|
138,557,587 |
|
116,395,746 |
|
Owners of parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country |
|
Peru |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
M$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
REVENUES |
|
211,260,913 |
|
213,624,981 |
|
208,496,821 |
|
(857,568 |
) |
(896,628 |
) |
|
|
2,435,382,454 |
|
2,418,919,355 |
|
2,536,388,439 |
|
Sales |
|
210,800,064 |
|
210,576,947 |
|
205,662,615 |
|
(857,568 |
) |
(896,628 |
) |
|
|
2,397,944,527 |
|
2,406,367,778 |
|
2,531,568,173 |
|
Energy sales |
|
202,614,778 |
|
202,852,442 |
|
204,588,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,341,244,481 |
|
2,346,027,026 |
|
2,441,009,414 |
|
Other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,964,060 |
|
12,085,420 |
|
20,557,959 |
|
Other services rendered |
|
8,185,286 |
|
7,724,505 |
|
1,073,811 |
|
(857,568 |
) |
(896,628 |
) |
|
|
34,735,986 |
|
48,255,332 |
|
70,000,800 |
|
Other operating income |
|
460,849 |
|
3,048,034 |
|
2,834,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,437,927 |
|
12,551,577 |
|
4,826,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLE USED |
|
(80,240,613 |
) |
(72,013,860 |
) |
(98,453,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,191,327,819 |
) |
(976,145,889 |
) |
(1,304,453,135 |
) |
Energy purchases |
|
(15,503,346 |
) |
(10,670,605 |
) |
(30,303,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236,937,399 |
) |
(164,312,507 |
) |
(224,432,412 |
) |
Fuel consumption |
|
(45,498,261 |
) |
(40,516,143 |
) |
(49,625,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634,777,206 |
) |
(587,063,935 |
) |
(845,936,200 |
) |
Transport expenses |
|
(12,778,594 |
) |
(13,693,435 |
) |
(14,257,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,036,184 |
) |
(173,035,230 |
) |
(187,324,624 |
) |
Other variable supplies and services |
|
(6,460,412 |
) |
(7,133,677 |
) |
(4,266,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,577,030 |
) |
(51,734,217 |
) |
(46,759,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN |
|
131,020,300 |
|
141,611,121 |
|
110,043,646 |
|
(857,568 |
) |
(896,628 |
) |
|
|
1,244,054,635 |
|
1,442,773,466 |
|
1,231,935,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other work performed by entity and capitalized |
|
|
|
214,054 |
|
169,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,126,628 |
|
731,901 |
|
500,315 |
|
Employee benefit expenses |
|
(6,161,429 |
) |
(6,537,925 |
) |
(5,650,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,066,349 |
) |
(75,564,322 |
) |
(63,799,789 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
(16,516,119 |
) |
(21,025,750 |
) |
(16,556,810 |
) |
857,568 |
|
896,628 |
|
764,241 |
|
(103,677,256 |
) |
(110,868,779 |
) |
(107,867,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS OPERATING RESULTS |
|
108,342,752 |
|
114,261,500 |
|
88,005,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
764,241 |
|
1,070,437,658 |
|
1,257,072,266 |
|
1,060,768,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses |
|
(38,208,869 |
) |
(38,212,838 |
) |
(36,233,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179,714,025 |
) |
(240,141,675 |
) |
(186,604,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
70,133,883 |
|
76,048,662 |
|
51,772,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
764,241 |
|
890,723,633 |
|
1,016,930,591 |
|
874,163,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL RESULTS |
|
(14,767,022 |
) |
(23,600,707 |
) |
(15,330,574 |
) |
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
(13,756,340 |
) |
(119,716,691 |
) |
(170,794,483 |
) |
(188,895,068 |
) |
Financial income |
|
455,981 |
|
1,341,180 |
|
248,487 |
|
(194,860 |
) |
(238,621 |
) |
(63,759 |
) |
10,083,190 |
|
25,315,918 |
|
34,323,234 |
|
Financial costs |
|
(15,533,121 |
) |
(25,576,058 |
) |
(15,579,061 |
) |
194,860 |
|
238,621 |
|
63,759 |
|
(142,256,150 |
) |
(188,368,384 |
) |
(198,439,587 |
) |
Gain (loss) for indexed assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,162,695 |
) |
9,275,308 |
|
(18,950,333 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange differences |
|
310,118 |
|
634,171 |
|
|
|
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
(13,756,340 |
) |
15,618,964 |
|
(17,017,325 |
) |
(5,828,382 |
) |
Gains |
|
805,044 |
|
635,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,756,340 |
) |
33,103,786 |
|
31,785,271 |
|
42,213,637 |
|
Losses |
|
(494,926 |
) |
(929 |
) |
|
|
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
|
|
(17,484,822 |
) |
(48,802,596 |
) |
(48,042,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the profit (loss) of associate accounted for using the equity method |
|
9,369,676 |
|
9,935,172 |
|
8,136,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,673,758 |
|
98,457,836 |
|
82,131,590 |
|
Gains (losses) from other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
764,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,686 |
|
(90,266 |
) |
1,016,336 |
|
Gains (losses) on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
455,621 |
|
(78,969 |
) |
(1,530,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,621,413 |
|
64,972 |
|
(707,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX |
|
65,192,158 |
|
62,304,158 |
|
43,812,370 |
|
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
(12,992,099 |
) |
864,574,799 |
|
944,568,650 |
|
767,708,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax |
|
(20,936,925 |
) |
(21,497,520 |
) |
(14,500,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179,964,192 |
) |
(172,468,296 |
) |
(210,177,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
44,255,233 |
|
40,806,638 |
|
29,312,104 |
|
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
(12,992,099 |
) |
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
Net income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
44,255,233 |
|
40,806,638 |
|
29,312,104 |
|
436,988 |
|
13,292,506 |
|
(12,992,099 |
) |
684,610,607 |
|
772,100,354 |
|
557,530,835 |
|
Owners of parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,555,794 |
|
627,053,406 |
|
433,177,184 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,054,813 |
|
145,046,948 |
|
124,353,651 |
|
31. GUARANTEE COMMITMENTS TO THIRD PARTY, OTHER CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS.
Creditor |
|
|
|
|
|
Type |
|
Committed Assets |
|
|
|
Outstanding balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
of the |
|
Debtor |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
as of December 31, |
|
Guarantee release date |
| ||||||||||||
Guarantee |
|
Name |
|
Relationship |
|
Guarantee |
|
Type |
|
Currency |
|
Accounting |
|
Currency |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2011 |
|
Assets |
|
2012 |
|
Assets |
|
Creditor Banks |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
Creditor |
|
Mortgage and Pledge |
|
Real Estate and Equipment |
|
ThCh$- |
|
|
|
ThCh$- |
|
|
|
370,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soc. de Energía de la República Argentina |
|
Endesa Argentina, Endesa Costanera |
|
Creditor |
|
Pledge |
|
Shares |
|
ThCh$ |
|
664,311 |
|
ThCh$ |
|
963,655 |
|
2,923,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitsubishi |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
Creditor |
|
Pledge |
|
Combined cycle |
|
ThCh$ |
|
41,642,467 |
|
ThCh$ |
|
66,236,055 |
|
72,279,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
Endesa Costanera |
|
Creditor |
|
Pledge |
|
Combined cycle |
|
ThCh$ |
|
12,875,127 |
|
ThCh$ |
|
4,011,514 |
|
4,346,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various Creditors |
|
Endesa Parent Company |
|
Creditor |
|
Guarantees |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
228,156 |
|
2,728,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various Creditors |
|
Edegel |
|
Creditor |
|
Pledge |
|
Real Estate and Equipment |
|
ThCh$ |
|
96,211,278 |
|
ThCh$ |
|
13,008,383 |
|
39,780,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander (Guarantee Agent) |
|
G.N.L. Quintero |
|
Associate |
|
Pledge |
|
Shares |
|
ThCh$- |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
94,071,116 |
|
93,151,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, Endesa Chile had future energy purchase commitments of ThCh$ 10,331,447 (ThCh$ 13,196,131 as of December 31, 2009 and ThCh$ 50,485,248 as of December 31, 2008)
Creditor |
|
|
|
|
|
Committed Assets |
|
Outstanding balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
of the |
|
Debtor |
|
Type of |
|
Type |
|
Value |
|
as of December 31, |
|
Guarantee release date |
| ||||||||||||||||
Guarantee |
|
Name |
|
Relationship |
|
Guarantee |
|
Currency |
|
Accounting |
|
Currency |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2011 |
|
Assets |
|
2012 |
|
Assets |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Bonds and Loans Bank |
|
Chinango |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Co-signer |
|
ThCh$ |
|
34,817,262 |
|
ThCh$ |
|
34,817,262 |
|
26,349,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ministry of Economy of the Chilean government decreed that the regulated consumption of energy distributors, without fixed energy supply contracts, should be served jointly by all generation companies, prorated to each companies fixed charge (this situation occurred from May 19, 2005 through December 31, 2009).
Regarding the aforementioned, the regulation enacted afterward has established that the generation companies will receive for these concepts the binding energy spot price, and they will either credit or charge the distributors any negative or positive differences that may arise with the current consumption at the current marginal cost. Also, the new regulation established a floor and a ceiling whereas the differences aforementioned could not be lower or higher than the 20% of energy spot price, and in case it is not sufficient, the residuals will be incorporated in the subsequent determination of energy spot price until all the differences are paid off entirely.
The estimated remaining recoverable amount for Endesa Chile at December 31, 2010 reaches Ch$ 66,000 million. The recovery and accounting for these amounts will take place through additional charges in the energy rate charged to distributors, which shall be applied and collected by the distributors through charges on future energy consumption of non-regulated clients.
Endesa Chiles personnel, including information regarding subsidiaries and jointly-controlled companies in the five Latin American countries where the Group is present, is distributed as follows as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
| ||||||||
Country |
|
Managers and |
|
Professionals and |
|
Workers and |
|
Total |
|
Average for |
|
Chile |
|
37 |
|
1,091 |
|
124 |
|
1,252 |
|
1,296 |
|
Argentina |
|
6 |
|
401 |
|
19 |
|
426 |
|
348 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
Peru |
|
7 |
|
220 |
|
17 |
|
244 |
|
238 |
|
Colombia |
|
6 |
|
421 |
|
17 |
|
444 |
|
424 |
|
Total |
|
56 |
|
2,137 |
|
178 |
|
2,371 |
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||||||
Country |
|
Managers and |
|
Professionals and |
|
Workers and |
|
Total |
|
Average for |
|
Chile |
|
46 |
|
1,084 |
|
207 |
|
1,337 |
|
1,396 |
|
Argentina |
|
7 |
|
305 |
|
20 |
|
332 |
|
326 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
4 |
|
Peru |
|
7 |
|
216 |
|
18 |
|
241 |
|
247 |
|
Colombia |
|
9 |
|
386 |
|
20 |
|
415 |
|
415 |
|
Total |
|
69 |
|
1,995 |
|
267 |
|
2,331 |
|
2,388 |
|
No significant subsequent events have occurred between December 31, 2010 and the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements.
Environmental expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are detailed as follows:
Company incurring the cost |
|
Project |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Chile S.A. |
|
Studies, monitoring, laboratory analysis, removal and final disposal of solid waste in hydroelectric power plants (HEPP) and thermoelectric power plants. |
|
|
|
3,859,367 |
|
3,330,696 |
|
Hidroeléctrica el Chocón S.A. |
|
ISO 14,001 audit, environmental monitoring and updating of environmental standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
9,205 |
|
Edegel S.A. |
|
Environmental monitoring, waste management, mitigations, research and development, protection from radiation, decrease in vibrations and restoration |
|
444,983 |
|
657,059 |
|
|
|
Gasatacama S.A. |
|
Environmental monitoring, air quality, marine monitoring, etc. |
|
72,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
Expenses in education and tourism |
|
294,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Certification of management system, Quality control and fuel qulity, Disposal of dangerous waste, Environmental impact study, Environmental leaflets, Hose inspection and tests. Maitenance ISO14,001/9,001. Liquid waste monitoring Drilling to monitor water tables and other. |
|
|
|
|
|
373,796 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
812,294 |
|
4,516,426 |
|
3,713,697 |
|
35. SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the summarized financial information under IFRS is as follows:
|
|
12/31/2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Current assets |
|
Non-current assets |
|
Total assets |
|
Current liabilities |
|
Non-current |
|
Total liabilities |
|
Revenues |
|
Expenses |
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
6,327,207 |
|
138,782,297 |
|
145,109,504 |
|
(137,123,791 |
) |
(20,442,170 |
) |
(157,565,961 |
) |
13,515,877 |
|
(16,056,170 |
) |
(2,540,293 |
) |
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. |
|
54,209,408 |
|
242,417,018 |
|
296,626,426 |
|
(60,865,292 |
) |
(41,020,747 |
) |
(101,886,039 |
) |
234,534,178 |
|
(57,265,757 |
) |
177,268,421 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
43,642,004 |
|
81,215,943 |
|
124,857,947 |
|
(55,987,180 |
) |
(11,948,576 |
) |
(67,935,756 |
) |
167,998,478 |
|
(154,961,416 |
) |
13,037,062 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
26,348,540 |
|
135,422,607 |
|
161,771,147 |
|
(48,954,765 |
) |
(13,940,056 |
) |
(62,894,821 |
) |
99,324,285 |
|
(35,590,926 |
) |
63,733,359 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |
|
28,342,554 |
|
77,234,443 |
|
105,576,997 |
|
(7,312,647 |
) |
(7,839,404 |
) |
(15,152,051 |
) |
45,280,244 |
|
(41,788,042 |
) |
3,492,202 |
|
Endesa Inversiones Generales S.A. |
|
1,589,366 |
|
3,384,173 |
|
4,973,539 |
|
(679,042 |
) |
(113,084 |
) |
(792,126 |
) |
5,340,990 |
|
(4,125,993 |
) |
1,214,997 |
|
Empresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A. |
|
12,087,688 |
|
1,101,211 |
|
13,188,899 |
|
(8,507,914 |
) |
(1,658,915 |
) |
(10,166,829 |
) |
23,779,248 |
|
(23,063,773 |
) |
715,475 |
|
Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A. |
|
|
|
25,157,716 |
|
25,157,716 |
|
(3,370,464 |
) |
|
|
(3,370,464 |
) |
|
|
(146,130 |
) |
(146,130 |
) |
Soc. Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |
|
21,178,870 |
|
17,552,855 |
|
38,731,725 |
|
(2,391,836 |
) |
(13,674,875 |
) |
(16,066,711 |
) |
6,701,752 |
|
(2,364,828 |
) |
4,336,924 |
|
Endesa Argentina S.A. |
|
7,852,572 |
|
33,753,943 |
|
41,606,515 |
|
(44,284 |
) |
|
|
(44,284 |
) |
5,641,118 |
|
151,175 |
|
5,792,293 |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
45,572,669 |
|
128,841,292 |
|
174,413,961 |
|
(107,230,903 |
) |
(65,903,875 |
) |
(173,134,778 |
) |
288,534,151 |
|
(290,157,746 |
) |
(1,623,595 |
) |
Hidroinvest S.A. |
|
466,398 |
|
24,559,532 |
|
25,025,930 |
|
(259,580 |
) |
|
|
(259,580 |
) |
|
|
185,942 |
|
185,942 |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
18,399,302 |
|
144,894,940 |
|
163,294,242 |
|
(43,781,981 |
) |
(38,683,634 |
) |
(82,465,615 |
) |
57,172,784 |
|
(32,791,612 |
) |
24,381,172 |
|
Southem Cone Power Argentina S.A. |
|
48,053 |
|
1,236,663 |
|
1,284,716 |
|
(183,850 |
) |
|
|
(183,850 |
) |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
(3,906 |
) |
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
154,997,283 |
|
1,203,713,202 |
|
1,358,710,485 |
|
(286,630,051 |
) |
(356,958,221 |
) |
(643,588,272 |
) |
507,137,563 |
|
(357,040,190 |
) |
150,097,373 |
|
Generandes Perú S.A. |
|
54,688 |
|
180,174,348 |
|
180,229,036 |
|
(21,008 |
) |
|
|
(21,008 |
) |
21,122,454 |
|
(214,017 |
) |
20,908,437 |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
44,851,844 |
|
643,944,854 |
|
688,796,698 |
|
(40,685,019 |
) |
(282,540,573 |
) |
(323,225,592 |
) |
188,755,959 |
|
(152,380,933 |
) |
36,375,026 |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
5,717,609 |
|
98,861,331 |
|
104,578,940 |
|
(21,081,723 |
) |
(49,460,678 |
) |
(70,542,401 |
) |
23,636,752 |
|
(19,685,636 |
) |
3,951,116 |
|
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota S.A. |
|
1,613,186 |
|
4,751,063 |
|
6,364,249 |
|
(865,075 |
) |
(471,851 |
) |
(1,336,926 |
) |
1,061,066 |
|
(598,489 |
) |
462,577 |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
3,880,921 |
|
50,729,673 |
|
54,610,594 |
|
(3,904,367 |
) |
(327,633 |
) |
(4,232,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,665,300 |
) |
(3,665,300 |
) |
Inversiones Gasatacama Holding Ltda. |
|
55,742,095 |
|
145,984,024 |
|
201,726,119 |
|
(69,155,266 |
) |
(21,720,110 |
) |
(90,875,376 |
) |
167,160,648 |
|
(147,165,903 |
) |
19,994,745 |
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Current assets |
|
Non-current assets |
|
Total assets |
|
Current liabilities |
|
Non-current |
|
Total liabilities |
|
Revenues |
|
Expenses |
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
20,342,545 |
|
141,348,885 |
|
161,691,430 |
|
(151,709,864 |
) |
(19,897,730 |
) |
(171,607,594 |
) |
5,363,817 |
|
(13,478,980 |
) |
(8,115,163 |
) |
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. |
|
66,918,651 |
|
250,679,247 |
|
317,597,898 |
|
(93,120,578 |
) |
(41,741,967 |
) |
(134,862,545 |
) |
199,025,325 |
|
(44,152,639 |
) |
154,872,686 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
53,986,693 |
|
85,953,344 |
|
139,940,037 |
|
(34,584,533 |
) |
(16,770,373 |
) |
(51,354,906 |
) |
119,444,441 |
|
(107,229,856 |
) |
12,214,585 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
64,692,377 |
|
139,047,187 |
|
203,739,564 |
|
(77,357,564 |
) |
(14,588,592 |
) |
(91,946,156 |
) |
102,435,170 |
|
(27,600,506 |
) |
74,834,664 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |
|
18,895,799 |
|
79,166,484 |
|
98,062,283 |
|
(4,768,430 |
) |
(6,362,133 |
) |
(11,130,563 |
) |
59,026,738 |
|
(52,369,255 |
) |
6,657,483 |
|
Endesa Inversiones Generales S.A. |
|
1,656,913 |
|
3,559,633 |
|
5,216,546 |
|
(835,342 |
) |
(131,357 |
) |
(966,699 |
) |
5,278,311 |
|
(3,994,880 |
) |
1,283,431 |
|
Empresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A. |
|
10,755,422 |
|
1,206,290 |
|
11,961,712 |
|
(6,729,033 |
) |
(1,825,356 |
) |
(8,554,389 |
) |
27,630,988 |
|
(25,766,921 |
) |
1,864,067 |
|
Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A. |
|
|
|
25,157,716 |
|
25,157,716 |
|
(3,224,334 |
) |
|
|
(3,224,334 |
) |
|
|
(166,553 |
) |
(166,553 |
) |
Soc. Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |
|
17,507,583 |
|
18,587,880 |
|
36,095,463 |
|
(2,090,726 |
) |
(15,675,501 |
) |
(17,766,227 |
) |
6,092,068 |
|
(1,160,459 |
) |
4,931,609 |
|
Endesa Argentina S.A. |
|
2,955,460 |
|
38,713,348 |
|
41,668,808 |
|
(44,707 |
) |
|
|
(44,707 |
) |
413,719 |
|
123,951 |
|
537,670 |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
46,132,764 |
|
139,465,744 |
|
185,598,508 |
|
(108,896,949 |
) |
(73,587,167 |
) |
(182,484,116 |
) |
228,090,396 |
|
(238,967,631 |
) |
(10,877,235 |
) |
Hidroinvest S.A. |
|
11,067,591 |
|
27,827,113 |
|
38,894,704 |
|
(347,897 |
) |
|
|
(347,897 |
) |
3,941,241 |
|
611,450 |
|
4,552,691 |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
59,552,103 |
|
91,442,295 |
|
150,994,398 |
|
(35,636,058 |
) |
(48,641,578 |
) |
(84,277,636 |
) |
65,298,279 |
|
(46,084,169 |
) |
19,214,110 |
|
Southem Cone Power Argentina S.A. |
|
58,317 |
|
1,401,197 |
|
1,459,514 |
|
(208,178 |
) |
|
|
(208,178 |
) |
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
(2,672 |
) |
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
256,813,794 |
|
1,228,326,578 |
|
1,485,140,372 |
|
(130,634,275 |
) |
(424,071,893 |
) |
(554,706,168 |
) |
500,829,922 |
|
(362,272,335 |
) |
138,557,587 |
|
Generandes Perú S.A. |
|
195,754 |
|
189,546,962 |
|
189,742,716 |
|
(30,872 |
) |
|
|
(30,872 |
) |
19,653,352 |
|
(165,000 |
) |
19,488,352 |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
50,563,350 |
|
699,489,852 |
|
750,053,202 |
|
(55,480,341 |
) |
(309,812,958 |
) |
(365,293,299 |
) |
197,723,819 |
|
(162,768,423 |
) |
34,955,396 |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
3,874,902 |
|
103,736,922 |
|
107,611,824 |
|
(16,093,363 |
) |
(61,224,726 |
) |
(77,318,089 |
) |
15,511,080 |
|
(14,352,555 |
) |
1,158,525 |
|
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota S.A. |
|
644,435 |
|
5,099,241 |
|
5,743,676 |
|
(740,067 |
) |
(438,364 |
) |
(1,178,431 |
) |
1,163,684 |
|
(603,983 |
) |
559,701 |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas de Aysén S.A. |
|
4,136,868 |
|
44,323,280 |
|
48,460,148 |
|
(18,926,306 |
) |
|
|
(18,926,306 |
) |
|
|
(3,056,976 |
) |
(3,056,976 |
) |
Inversiones Gasatacama Holding Ltda. |
|
57,217,616 |
|
158,174,887 |
|
215,392,503 |
|
(93,938,500 |
) |
(21,233,800 |
) |
(115,172,300 |
) |
171,652,188 |
|
(159,554,219 |
) |
12,097,969 |
|
APPENDIX No. 1 ENDESA CHILE GROUP COMPANIES:
This appendix is part of Note 2.4.1Subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities.
Taxpayer ID |
|
Company |
|
|
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Number |
|
(In alphabetical order) |
|
Functional currency |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Relationship |
|
Country |
|
Activity |
Foreign |
|
Atacama Finance Co |
|
US Dollars |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Islas Caiman |
|
|
76,003,204-2 |
|
Central Eólica Canela S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
75.00% |
|
75.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
75.00% |
|
75.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Promoting and developing renewable energy projects |
76,652,400-1 |
|
Centrales Hidroeléctricas De Aysén S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
51.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
51.00% |
|
51.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
51.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Developing and operating hydroelectric project |
Foreign |
|
Chinango S.A.C. |
|
Peruvian Soles |
|
0.00% |
|
80.00% |
|
80.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
80.00% |
|
80.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Peru |
|
Generating, retailing and distributing electric energy |
96,783,220-0 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
100.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Complete cycle of electric energy |
96,770,940-9 |
|
Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
99.94% |
|
0.06% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.94% |
|
0.06% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Complete cycle of electric energy |
77,625,850-4 |
|
Consorcio Ara- Ingendesa Ltda. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Project engineering consulting |
76,738,990-6 |
|
Consorcio Ara- Ingendesa Sener Ltda. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
33.33% |
|
33.33% |
|
0.00% |
|
33.33% |
|
33.33% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Application and Basic Engineering Contract Line Maipu |
77,573,910-K |
|
Consorcio Ingendesa Minimetal Ltda. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Engineering services |
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A |
|
Peruvian Soles |
|
29.40% |
|
54.20% |
|
83.60% |
|
29.40% |
|
54.20% |
|
83.60% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Peru |
|
Generating, retailing and distributing electric energy |
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombian Peso |
|
26.87% |
|
0.00% |
|
26.87% |
|
26.87% |
|
0.00% |
|
26.87% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Colombia |
|
Generating electric energy |
96,588,800-4 |
|
Empresa de Ingeniería Ingendesa S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
98.75% |
|
1.25% |
|
100.00% |
|
98.75% |
|
1.25% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Providing engineering services |
96,589,170-6 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
94.98% |
|
0.01% |
|
94.99% |
|
94.98% |
|
0.01% |
|
94.99% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Complete cycle of electric energy |
96,504,980-0 |
|
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
92.65% |
|
0.00% |
|
92.65% |
|
92.65% |
|
0.00% |
|
92.65% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Complete cycle of electric energy |
Foreign |
|
Endesa Argentina S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
99.66% |
|
0.34% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.66% |
|
0.34% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Holding Company |
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
12.33% |
|
57.43% |
|
69.76% |
|
12.33% |
|
57.43% |
|
69.76% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Generating and retailing electricity |
96,827,970-K |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Renewable energy projects |
96,526,450-7 |
|
Endesa Inversiones Generales S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
99.51% |
|
0.49% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.51% |
|
0.49% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Holding Company |
Foreign |
|
Energex Co. |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Islas Caiman |
|
Holding Company |
96,830,980-3 |
|
Gas Atacama S.A. |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Managing and directing companies |
Foreign |
|
Gasoducto Atacama Argentina S.A. |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.00% |
|
49.99% |
|
49.99% |
|
0.00% |
|
49.99% |
|
49.99% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Argentina |
|
Transporting natural gas |
78,882,820-9 |
|
Gasoducto Atacama Chile S.A. |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Transporting natural gas |
77,032,280-4 |
|
Gasoducto Taltal Ltda. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Transporting natural gas |
Foreign |
|
Generandes Peru S.A. |
|
Peruvian Soles |
|
61.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
61.00% |
|
61.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
61.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Peru |
|
Holding Company |
76,041,891-9 |
|
Hidroaysén Transmisión S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.51% |
|
50.49% |
|
51.00% |
|
0.51% |
|
50.49% |
|
51.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Developing electricity transmission systems |
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
2.48% |
|
65.19% |
|
67.67% |
|
2.48% |
|
65.19% |
|
67.67% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Producing and retailing electric energy |
Foreign |
|
Hidroinvest S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
41.94% |
|
54.15% |
|
96.09% |
|
41.94% |
|
54.15% |
|
96.09% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Holding Company |
Foreign |
|
Ingendesa do Brasil Ltda. |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
1.00% |
|
99.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
1.00% |
|
99.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Brazil |
|
Project engineering consulting |
96,887,060-2 |
|
Inversiones Endesa Norte S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Energy investment projects in northern Chile |
76,014,570-K |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Transporting natural gas |
96,905,700-K |
|
Progas S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Distributing gas |
96,671,360-7 |
|
Sociedad Concesionaria Túnel El Melón S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
99.99% |
|
0.01% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Chile |
|
Executing, constructing and operating El Melon Tunnel |
Foreign |
|
Sociedad Portuaria Central Cartagena S.A. |
|
Colombian Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
94.95% |
|
94.95% |
|
0.00% |
|
94.95% |
|
94.95% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Colombia |
|
Administration of port facilities |
Foreign |
|
Southern Cone Power Argentina S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
98.00% |
|
2.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
98.00% |
|
2.00% |
|
100.00% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Holding Company |
Foreign |
|
Termoeléctrica José de San Martín S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
20.86% |
|
20.86% |
|
0.00% |
|
20.86% |
|
20.86% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Construction and operation of a combined cycle plant |
Foreign |
|
Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
20.86% |
|
20.86% |
|
0.00% |
|
20.86% |
|
20.86% |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Argentina |
|
Production, transportation and electricity distribution |
77,017,930-0 |
|
Transmisora Eléctrica de Quillota Ltda. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
0.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
50.00% |
|
Jointly Controlled |
|
Chile |
|
Transporting and distributing electric energy |
APPENDIX No. 2 CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION:
This appendix is part of Note 2.4.1 Variations in the consolidated perimeter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Taxpayer ID Number |
|
Company |
|
Functional currency |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Relationship |
|
Country |
|
Activity |
|
|
|
(In alphabetical order) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Sociedad Portuaria Central Cartagena S.A. |
|
Colombian Peso |
|
0.00 |
% |
94.95 |
% |
94.95 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
94.95 |
% |
94.95 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
Subsidiary |
|
Colombia |
|
Administration of port facilities |
|
This appendix is part of Note 3.g Investments in associates accounted for using the equity method.
Taxpayer ID |
|
|
|
|
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
% Ownership Interest |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Number |
|
Company |
|
Functional currency |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Direct |
|
Indirect |
|
Total |
|
Country |
|
Activity |
|
|
|
(In alphabetical order) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Distrilec Inversora S.A. |
|
ArgentinePeso |
|
0.89 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
0.89 |
% |
0.89 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
0.89 |
% |
Argentina |
|
Holding Company |
|
96,806,130-5 |
|
Electrogas S.A |
|
US Dollar |
|
0.02 |
% |
42.48 |
% |
42.50 |
% |
0.02 |
% |
42.48 |
% |
42.50 |
% |
Chile |
|
Holding Company |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
|
Brazilean Reais |
|
36.26 |
% |
4.18 |
% |
40.44 |
% |
36.26 |
% |
4.18 |
% |
40.44 |
% |
Brazil |
|
Holding Company |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Cemsa S.A. |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
0.00 |
% |
45.00 |
% |
45.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
45.00 |
% |
45.00 |
% |
Argentina |
|
Wholesale purchase and sale of electric energy |
|
76,418,940-K |
|
GNL Chile S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
33.33 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
33.33 |
% |
33.33 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
33.33 |
% |
Chile |
|
Promoting project to supply liquefied natural gas |
|
76,788,080-4 |
|
GNL Quintero S.A. |
|
US Dollar |
|
20.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
20.00 |
% |
20.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
20.00 |
% |
Chile |
|
Developing, designing and supplying regasification terminal for liquefied natural gas |
|
96,889,570-2 |
|
Inversiones Electrogas S.A. |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
42.50 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
42.50 |
% |
42.50 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
42.50 |
% |
Chile |
|
Holding Company |
|
APPENDIX No. 4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE FINANCIAL DEBT:
This appendix is part of Note 16 Other financial liabilities.
The following tables show the estimated of undiscounted cash flows by type of financial debt:
· Summary of bank loans by currency and maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curremt |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Segment |
|
Currency |
|
Effective |
|
Undetermined |
|
Up to 1 |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 12 |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More |
|
Total Non- |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 12 |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
More |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
816,706 |
|
18,915,156 |
|
19,731,862 |
|
3,202,593 |
|
83,824,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
87,027,234 |
|
1,837,468 |
|
132,344,273 |
|
134,181,741 |
|
110,691,518 |
|
107,668,569 |
|
1,257,552 |
|
|
|
219,617,639 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
1,458,040 |
|
17,809,137 |
|
19,267,177 |
|
14,419,663 |
|
14,145,757 |
|
21,661,326 |
|
|
|
50,226,746 |
|
6,879,846 |
|
12,043,084 |
|
18,922,930 |
|
24,300,608 |
|
1,839,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,139,946 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
89,871 |
|
210,254 |
|
300,125 |
|
6,409,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,409,546 |
|
306,989 |
|
938,019 |
|
1,245,008 |
|
21,418,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,418,951 |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
5,085,358 |
|
18,145,263 |
|
23,230,621 |
|
4,013,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,013,855 |
|
6,253,151 |
|
12,774,805 |
|
19,027,956 |
|
23,974,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,974,767 |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
8.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
14,009,721 |
|
19,249,278 |
|
33,258,999 |
|
16,649,229 |
|
1,696,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,346,196 |
|
7,777,416 |
|
9,299,867 |
|
17,077,283 |
|
16,726,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,726,744 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
744,241 |
|
5,091,793 |
|
5,836,034 |
|
|
|
75,664,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
75,664,686 |
|
2,474,692 |
|
7,561,559 |
|
10,036,251 |
|
88,421,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,421,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,203,937 |
|
79,420,881 |
|
101,624,818 |
|
44,694,886 |
|
175,332,051 |
|
21,661,326 |
|
|
|
241,688,263 |
|
25,529,562 |
|
174,961,607 |
|
200,491,169 |
|
285,533,867 |
|
109,507,907 |
|
1,257,552 |
|
|
|
396,299,326 |
|
· Bank loans by debtor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
Nominal |
|
Frequency |
|
Current |
| ||||
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
ID of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
Interest |
|
interest |
|
of |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
Number |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
rate |
|
payment |
|
90 days |
|
90 days |
|
current |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco de Crédito |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
3.97% |
|
3.97% |
|
Term |
|
653,107 |
|
1,953,825 |
|
2,606,932 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco de Crédito |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
3.97% |
|
3.97% |
|
Quarterly |
|
438,997 |
|
1,302,348 |
|
1,741,345 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.19% |
|
7.19% |
|
Quarterly |
|
245,345 |
|
816,040 |
|
1,061,385 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
5.70% |
|
5.70% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
23,655 |
|
3,427,268 |
|
3,450,923 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.59% |
|
4.28% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
3.80% |
|
3.80% |
|
Term |
|
12,762 |
|
42,449 |
|
55,211 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
4.30% |
|
4.30% |
|
Term |
|
77,109 |
|
167,805 |
|
244,914 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
5.95% |
|
5.95% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Westlb |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
5.50% |
|
5.50% |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.60% |
|
6.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco de Crédito |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
9.59% |
|
9.59% |
|
Quarterly |
|
96,936 |
|
10,309,656 |
|
10,406,592 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.55% |
|
6.55% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Davivienda |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
603,337 |
|
603,337 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bancolombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
432,186 |
|
432,186 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bancolombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
328,989 |
|
1,094,247 |
|
1,423,236 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
BBVA Colombia |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Annual |
|
|
|
1,580,860 |
|
1,580,860 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Santander Central Hispano |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.99% |
|
6.99% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
415,252 |
|
1,381,163 |
|
1,796,415 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Provincia de Buenos Aires |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
6.00% |
|
6.00% |
|
Term |
|
600,038 |
|
|
|
600,038 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Galicia |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
5.44% |
|
5.44% |
|
Term |
|
634,568 |
|
351,529 |
|
986,097 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Credit Suisse International |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
13.88% |
|
12.26% |
|
Term |
|
648,599 |
|
2,010,220 |
|
2,658,819 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
6.30% |
|
5.00% |
|
Term |
|
238,978 |
|
188,868 |
|
427,846 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Nación Argentina |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.82% |
|
15.82% |
|
Term |
|
184,556 |
|
2,497,668 |
|
2,682,224 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Mediocredito Italiano |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
14.00% |
|
1.75% |
|
Term |
|
4,198 |
|
954,555 |
|
958,753 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Santander Río |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.00% |
|
15.00% |
|
Term |
|
881,772 |
|
|
|
881,772 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Itau |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.12% |
|
18.12% |
|
Term |
|
1,853,593 |
|
895,623 |
|
2,749,216 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
13.00% |
|
13.00% |
|
Term |
|
3,807,821 |
|
146,831 |
|
3,954,652 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Galicia |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.00% |
|
15.00% |
|
Term |
|
1,808,418 |
|
|
|
1,808,418 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
10.28% |
|
5.32% |
|
Term |
|
6,489 |
|
426,386 |
|
432,875 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
6.70% |
|
6.70% |
|
Term |
|
35,128 |
|
1,011,545 |
|
1,046,673 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Macro |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
14.75% |
|
14.75% |
|
Term |
|
357,550 |
|
|
|
357,550 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Standard Bank |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
15.40% |
|
15.40% |
|
Term |
|
1,159,080 |
|
|
|
1,159,080 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Superville |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
13.00% |
|
13.00% |
|
Term |
|
1,788,875 |
|
|
|
1,788,875 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
B.N.P. Paribas |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
5.96% |
|
5.96% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
60,946 |
|
944,030 |
|
1,004,976 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Export Development Corpotation Loan |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
2.50% |
|
2.50% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
345,404 |
|
700,155 |
|
1,045,559 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
408,841 |
|
17,060,873 |
|
17,469,714 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Caja Madrid, Caja Madrid Miami Agency |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Santander Central Hispano S.A. N.Y.B. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Citibank NA ,Nassau, Bahamas Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Ing Bank N.V. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
San Paolo IMI S.p.A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
HSBC Bank pic Spanish Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
ABN AMRO Bank |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Instituto de Credito Oficial |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.65% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.65% |
|
1.60% |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
2.28% |
|
2.28% |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Caja Madrid, Caja Madrid Miami Agency |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
1.77% |
|
1.77% |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Deutsche Bank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
3.80% |
|
3.80% |
|
Term |
|
1,479,285 |
|
7,585,610 |
|
9,064,895 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Standard Bank |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
3.80% |
|
3.80% |
|
Term |
|
1,477,401 |
|
7,582,650 |
|
9,060,051 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
ITAU - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.67% |
|
18.67% |
|
Term |
|
136,513 |
|
1,869,470 |
|
2,005,983 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
STANDARD - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.67% |
|
18.67% |
|
Term |
|
106,749 |
|
1,460,783 |
|
1,567,532 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
SANTANDER - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.67% |
|
18.67% |
|
Term |
|
760,895 |
|
1,245,088 |
|
2,005,983 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
HIPOTECARIO - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.67% |
|
18.67% |
|
Term |
|
88,490 |
|
1,223,925 |
|
1,312,415 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
GALICIA - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
18.67% |
|
18.67% |
|
Term |
|
41,985 |
|
582,414 |
|
624,399 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Citibank |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
14.30% |
|
14.30% |
|
Term |
|
25,459 |
|
714,554 |
|
740,013 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
BBVA |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
14.50% |
|
14.50% |
|
Term |
|
21,510 |
|
595,558 |
|
617,068 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Macro |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.75% |
|
17.75% |
|
Term |
|
105,325 |
|
2,599,171 |
|
2,704,496 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Santander Rio - Sindicado |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.44% |
|
17.44% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
463,089 |
|
3,083,714 |
|
3,546,803 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Industrial de Azul |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.14% |
|
17.14% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
378,715 |
|
368,379 |
|
747,094 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
PNC BANK |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
3.09% |
|
3.09% |
|
Bi-annual |
|
1,515 |
|
210,098 |
|
211,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,624,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than |
|
More |
|
Total non- |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
4,307,956 |
|
|
|
4,307,955 |
|
|
|
8,615,911 |
|
5,071,000 |
|
|
|
5,071,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,603,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,603,280 |
|
175,139 |
|
4,118,468 |
|
4,293,607 |
|
10,492,763 |
|
1,839,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,332,101 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,957,430 |
|
14,145,757 |
|
17,353,371 |
|
|
|
33,456,558 |
|
513,959 |
|
1,519,062 |
|
2,033,021 |
|
8,387,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,387,679 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,697,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697,864 |
|
80,855 |
|
3,854,157 |
|
3,935,012 |
|
5,420,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,420,166 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,221 |
|
113,730 |
|
150,951 |
|
2,819,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,819,269 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
1,379,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379,498 |
|
58,946 |
|
180,114 |
|
239,060 |
|
5,640,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,640,104 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
5,030,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,030,048 |
|
55,708 |
|
170,218 |
|
225,926 |
|
5,386,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,386,989 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014,200 |
|
|
|
1,014,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,970 |
|
1,014,200 |
|
1,023,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,879 |
|
433,518 |
|
575,397 |
|
6,066,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,066,548 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
4,853,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,853,133 |
|
15,723 |
|
1,537,197 |
|
1,552,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,235 |
|
40,439 |
|
53,674 |
|
1,506,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506,041 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
7,812,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,812,518 |
|
255,968 |
|
782,125 |
|
1,038,093 |
|
9,120,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120,095 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
5,729,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,729,883 |
|
183,357 |
|
560,258 |
|
743,615 |
|
6,781,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,781,522 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
18,429,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,429,277 |
|
603,814 |
|
1,844,989 |
|
2,448,803 |
|
21,513,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,513,776 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
20,431,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,431,485 |
|
669,415 |
|
2,045,433 |
|
2,714,848 |
|
23,851,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,851,093 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
23,261,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,261,523 |
|
762,138 |
|
2,328,754 |
|
3,090,892 |
|
27,154,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,154,793 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
2,055,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,055,803 |
|
88,632 |
|
2,428,842 |
|
2,517,474 |
|
2,202,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,202,337 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,771,743 |
|
|
|
2,771,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
1,994,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,994,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,760 |
|
1,968,909 |
|
1,981,669 |
|
977,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,862 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,453,137 |
|
|
|
4,453,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,674,866 |
|
1,015,968 |
|
2,690,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858,964 |
|
789,556 |
|
1,648,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
404,266 |
|
410,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,823,007 |
|
1,648,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,471,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,379,586 |
|
337,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,717,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
81,838,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
81,838,285 |
|
76,659 |
|
84,077 |
|
160,736 |
|
310,503 |
|
295,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
606,380 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,659 |
|
84,077 |
|
160,736 |
|
310,503 |
|
295,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
606,380 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,659 |
|
84,077 |
|
160,736 |
|
310,503 |
|
295,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
606,380 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,659 |
|
84,078 |
|
160,737 |
|
310,503 |
|
295,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
606,380 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,659 |
|
84,078 |
|
160,737 |
|
310,503 |
|
295,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
606,379 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,767 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,024 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,767 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,024 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,767 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,024 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,767 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,024 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,939 |
|
1,052,816 |
|
1,403,755 |
|
102,121,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,121,878 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,767 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,024 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,790 |
|
173,010 |
|
185,800 |
|
345,665 |
|
239,768 |
|
209,592 |
|
|
|
795,025 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,915 |
|
1,775,019 |
|
2,355,934 |
|
4,711,868 |
|
104,750,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
109,462,450 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,829 |
|
127,820,814 |
|
128,260,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
979,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979,026 |
|
1,691,369 |
|
4,966,337 |
|
6,657,706 |
|
10,883,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,883,496 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
979,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979,026 |
|
1,694,990 |
|
4,975,360 |
|
6,670,350 |
|
10,888,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,888,934 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,687,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687,700 |
|
199,352 |
|
1,449,462 |
|
1,648,814 |
|
4,169,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,169,361 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,318,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318,645 |
|
155,744 |
|
1,132,392 |
|
1,288,136 |
|
3,257,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,257,313 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,687,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687,700 |
|
130,825 |
|
951,209 |
|
1,082,034 |
|
2,736,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,736,143 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
1,106,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106,099 |
|
62,298 |
|
452,957 |
|
515,255 |
|
1,302,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,925 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
526,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526,511 |
|
229,470 |
|
1,539,414 |
|
1,768,884 |
|
4,283,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,283,140 |
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
8,328,139 |
|
1,696,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,025,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gas Atacama Holding Ltda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
237,177 |
|
242,927 |
|
231,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,688,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
200,491,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,299,326 |
|
b) Secured and non-secured obligations
· Summary of secured and non-secured obligations by currency and maturity date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curremt |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Total Non- |
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
Up to 1 |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 12 |
|
of |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
10 |
|
Current as of |
|
country |
|
Currency |
|
rate |
|
Undetermined |
|
months |
|
months |
|
months |
|
31/12/2010 |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
31/12/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
8.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
14,777,239 |
|
26,111,200 |
|
40,888,439 |
|
255,597,665 |
|
110,491,415 |
|
120,255,137 |
|
334,714,810 |
|
821,059,027 |
|
Chile |
|
CH$ |
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
7,758,689 |
|
29,301,113 |
|
37,059,802 |
|
68,093,670 |
|
164,544,759 |
|
220,120,553 |
|
307,081,353 |
|
759,840,335 |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
870,099 |
|
6,351,625 |
|
7,221,724 |
|
18,968,745 |
|
8,678,373 |
|
31,925,751 |
|
6,171,990 |
|
65,744,859 |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4,844,575 |
|
7,068,729 |
|
11,913,304 |
|
20,496,512 |
|
10,801,554 |
|
9,641,727 |
|
|
|
40,939,793 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
9.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
7,616,739 |
|
99,574,897 |
|
107,191,636 |
|
46,910,074 |
|
183,051,591 |
|
133,262,992 |
|
35,294,634 |
|
398,519,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,867,341 |
|
168,407,564 |
|
204,274,905 |
|
410,066,666 |
|
477,567,692 |
|
515,206,160 |
|
683,262,787 |
|
2,086,103,305 |
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Maturity |
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Total Non- |
|
Segment |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 12 |
|
of |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 10 |
|
10 |
|
Current as of |
|
country |
|
months |
|
months |
|
31-12-2009 |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
31-12-2009 |
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Chile |
|
10,006,217 |
|
30,574,552 |
|
40,580,769 |
|
81,161,538 |
|
252,788,328 |
|
133,318,105 |
|
258,219,240 |
|
725,487,211 |
|
Chile |
|
2,775,752 |
|
12,104,618 |
|
14,880,370 |
|
29,217,551 |
|
24,632,198 |
|
32,959,256 |
|
426,898,668 |
|
513,707,673 |
|
Peru |
|
724,841 |
|
2,214,792 |
|
2,939,633 |
|
19,585,709 |
|
3,563,753 |
|
20,707,042 |
|
13,566,934 |
|
57,423,438 |
|
Peru |
|
948,197 |
|
13,247,956 |
|
14,196,153 |
|
15,073,775 |
|
32,897,255 |
|
1,250,822 |
|
10,709,864 |
|
59,931,716 |
|
Colombia |
|
8,435,251 |
|
64,757,060 |
|
73,192,311 |
|
112,074,992 |
|
75,248,665 |
|
96,743,894 |
|
200,793,134 |
|
484,860,685 |
|
|
|
22,890,258 |
|
122,898,978 |
|
145,789,236 |
|
257,113,565 |
|
389,130,199 |
|
284,979,119 |
|
910,187,840 |
|
1,841,410,723 |
|
· Secured and non-secured obligations by debtor
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
Nominal |
|
Frequency |
|
ID |
|
of |
|
Country |
|
ID of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
of |
|
Interest |
|
interest |
|
of |
|
Number |
|
Company |
|
debtor |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
lender |
|
currency |
|
rate |
|
rate |
|
payment |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.74 |
% |
6.31 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.49 |
% |
6.28 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.17 |
% |
6.17 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.11 |
% |
6.11 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
5.92 |
% |
5.92 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.17 |
% |
6.17 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.33 |
% |
6.33 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.16 |
% |
5.97 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.06 |
% |
6.06 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.44 |
% |
6.44 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
9.14 |
% |
7.78 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.90 |
% |
7.13 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
7.24 |
% |
6.63 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.73 |
% |
6.00 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.10 |
% |
6.10 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.23 |
% |
6.23 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.77 |
% |
6.47 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.52 |
% |
6.09 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.46 |
% |
6.16 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.64 |
% |
6.16 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
Soles |
|
6.61 |
% |
5.91 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Continental |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
6.06 |
% |
6.06 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.05 |
% |
7.05 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos A-10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.21 |
% |
7.21 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B-103 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
5.11 |
% |
5.11 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos A102 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.34 |
% |
6.34 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos A5 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
4.83 |
% |
4.83 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
4.83 |
% |
4.83 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B15 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
5.33 |
% |
5.33 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos A5 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.77 |
% |
7.77 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B9 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
6.07 |
% |
6.07 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B12 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
9.27 |
% |
8.07 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos B104 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.94 |
% |
7.94 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos C10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
8.14 |
% |
8.14 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Bonos C10 |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
7.00 |
% |
7.00 |
% |
No |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
Colombia |
|
Foreign |
|
Papeles comerciales |
|
Colombia |
|
CPs |
|
4.21 |
% |
4.00 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-1 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
7.88 |
% |
7.88 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-2 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
7.33 |
% |
7.33 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - Primera Emisión S-3 |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.13 |
% |
8.13 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
Banco Santander Chile - 264 Serie-F |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
6.20 |
% |
6.20 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.35 |
% |
8.35 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
Foreign |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon - 144 - A |
|
U.S. |
|
US$ |
|
8.63 |
% |
8.63 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,036,000-K |
|
Banco Santander Chile - 317 Serie-H |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
6.20 |
% |
6.20 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,036,000-K |
|
Banco Santander Chile - 318 Serie-K |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
3.80 |
% |
3.80 |
% |
No |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
97,036,000-K |
|
Banco Santander Chile - 522 Serie-M |
|
Chile |
|
Ch$ |
|
4.75 |
% |
4.75 |
% |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ID |
|
of |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
4,162,360 |
|
|
|
4,162,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,120 |
|
6,348,902 |
|
6,452,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
66,273 |
|
220,431 |
|
286,704 |
|
528,747 |
|
1,293,774 |
|
5,217,004 |
|
|
|
7,039,525 |
|
70,916 |
|
216,689 |
|
287,605 |
|
575,210 |
|
4,600,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,175,484 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
65,396 |
|
217,512 |
|
282,908 |
|
521,745 |
|
1,276,641 |
|
4,424,723 |
|
|
|
6,223,109 |
|
67,490 |
|
206,221 |
|
273,711 |
|
547,422 |
|
4,658,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,206,294 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
56,693 |
|
188,567 |
|
245,260 |
|
452,314 |
|
3,464,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,916,406 |
|
66,805 |
|
4,520,998 |
|
4,587,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
68,242 |
|
226,979 |
|
295,221 |
|
4,482,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,482,746 |
|
64,750 |
|
197,846 |
|
262,596 |
|
4,407,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407,463 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
67,586 |
|
224,796 |
|
292,382 |
|
4,524,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,524,506 |
|
80,988 |
|
247,465 |
|
328,453 |
|
5,535,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,535,754 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
69,554 |
|
231,344 |
|
300,898 |
|
4,557,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,557,650 |
|
69,203 |
|
211,455 |
|
280,658 |
|
561,316 |
|
490,575 |
|
624,368 |
|
5,769,227 |
|
7,445,486 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
269,406 |
|
4,353,667 |
|
4,623,073 |
|
626,739 |
|
|
|
5,590,323 |
|
|
|
6,217,062 |
|
159,078 |
|
486,073 |
|
645,151 |
|
11,324,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,324,482 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
75,208 |
|
250,147 |
|
325,355 |
|
428,296 |
|
|
|
3,383,243 |
|
|
|
3,811,539 |
|
63,039 |
|
192,619 |
|
255,658 |
|
4,183,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,183,579 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
103,734 |
|
345,028 |
|
448,762 |
|
600,026 |
|
1,468,183 |
|
1,491,890 |
|
6,171,990 |
|
9,732,089 |
|
83,750 |
|
255,901 |
|
339,651 |
|
679,302 |
|
593,691 |
|
755,607 |
|
8,755,978 |
|
10,784,578 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
75,334 |
|
250,569 |
|
325,903 |
|
601,038 |
|
1,470,659 |
|
4,120,651 |
|
|
|
6,192,348 |
|
115,983 |
|
354,393 |
|
470,376 |
|
940,751 |
|
822,191 |
|
4,968,962 |
|
|
|
6,731,904 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
53,683 |
|
178,554 |
|
232,237 |
|
532,248 |
|
846,573 |
|
5,665,215 |
|
|
|
7,044,036 |
|
83,747 |
|
255,894 |
|
339,641 |
|
679,283 |
|
593,675 |
|
755,586 |
|
4,810,956 |
|
6,839,500 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
78,556 |
|
261,284 |
|
339,840 |
|
567,661 |
|
|
|
5,504,523 |
|
|
|
6,072,184 |
|
59,706 |
|
182,436 |
|
242,142 |
|
484,285 |
|
423,252 |
|
3,283,654 |
|
|
|
4,191,191 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
71,151 |
|
236,654 |
|
307,805 |
|
608,863 |
|
|
|
6,169,906 |
|
|
|
6,778,769 |
|
83,525 |
|
255,215 |
|
338,740 |
|
677,480 |
|
592,099 |
|
5,490,481 |
|
|
|
6,760,060 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
76,315 |
|
253,831 |
|
330,146 |
|
827,616 |
|
4,892,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,720,574 |
|
76,013 |
|
232,261 |
|
308,274 |
|
616,547 |
|
538,845 |
|
5,452,752 |
|
|
|
6,608,144 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
78,364 |
|
260,646 |
|
339,010 |
|
625,209 |
|
4,767,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,392,256 |
|
69,435 |
|
212,161 |
|
281,596 |
|
563,191 |
|
492,214 |
|
626,454 |
|
4,940,637 |
|
6,622,496 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
67,914 |
|
225,888 |
|
293,802 |
|
4,639,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639,193 |
|
59,200 |
|
180,888 |
|
240,088 |
|
480,175 |
|
3,887,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,367,839 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
64,633 |
|
214,975 |
|
279,608 |
|
164,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,402 |
|
71,259 |
|
217,735 |
|
288,994 |
|
577,989 |
|
4,431,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,009,864 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
77,560 |
|
5,057,591 |
|
5,135,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,574 |
|
215,642 |
|
286,216 |
|
572,431 |
|
4,479,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,051,690 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,629 |
|
221,923 |
|
294,552 |
|
589,104 |
|
4,507,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,096,121 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,828 |
|
250,031 |
|
331,859 |
|
663,720 |
|
5,349,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,013,225 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
66,712 |
|
221,891 |
|
288,603 |
|
14,176,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,176,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
925,274 |
|
46,241,341 |
|
47,166,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184,467 |
|
3,619,205 |
|
4,803,672 |
|
9,607,344 |
|
8,396,555 |
|
53,304,242 |
|
|
|
71,308,141 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
928,950 |
|
3,089,767 |
|
4,018,717 |
|
7,411,403 |
|
|
|
58,531,760 |
|
|
|
65,943,163 |
|
177,434 |
|
542,158 |
|
719,592 |
|
1,439,184 |
|
1,257,807 |
|
10,103,939 |
|
|
|
12,800,930 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
789,965 |
|
2,627,492 |
|
3,417,457 |
|
6,302,546 |
|
32,953,942 |
|
|
|
20,688,168 |
|
59,944,656 |
|
822,066 |
|
2,511,868 |
|
3,333,934 |
|
6,667,867 |
|
5,827,533 |
|
7,416,861 |
|
42,170,891 |
|
62,083,152 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
127,910 |
|
425,441 |
|
553,351 |
|
1,020,502 |
|
10,705,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,725,645 |
|
1,272,041 |
|
3,886,791 |
|
5,158,832 |
|
48,948,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,948,202 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
920,115 |
|
3,060,381 |
|
3,980,496 |
|
7,340,914 |
|
12,326,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,667,877 |
|
848,027 |
|
31,784,107 |
|
32,632,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
631,089 |
|
16,269,543 |
|
16,900,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,884 |
|
897,979 |
|
1,191,863 |
|
15,876,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,876,519 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
525,615 |
|
1,748,240 |
|
2,273,855 |
|
4,193,491 |
|
23,479,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,672,727 |
|
195,923 |
|
10,388,423 |
|
10,584,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
1,080,324 |
|
3,593,253 |
|
4,673,577 |
|
8,619,110 |
|
74,169,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
82,788,922 |
|
241,092 |
|
736,669 |
|
977,761 |
|
1,955,521 |
|
13,325,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,280,611 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
454,112 |
|
1,510,415 |
|
1,964,527 |
|
3,623,022 |
|
8,865,052 |
|
27,196,423 |
|
|
|
39,684,497 |
|
916,023 |
|
2,798,961 |
|
3,714,984 |
|
7,429,968 |
|
6,493,589 |
|
8,264,567 |
|
47,033,322 |
|
69,221,446 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,907 |
|
1,001,939 |
|
1,329,846 |
|
2,659,692 |
|
2,324,498 |
|
2,958,452 |
|
22,948,959 |
|
30,891,601 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
774,134 |
|
2,574,836 |
|
3,348,970 |
|
6,176,240 |
|
15,112,435 |
|
42,007,978 |
|
|
|
63,296,653 |
|
527,539 |
|
1,611,923 |
|
2,139,462 |
|
4,278,924 |
|
26,076,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,355,792 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
278,613 |
|
926,691 |
|
1,205,304 |
|
2,222,846 |
|
5,439,008 |
|
5,526,831 |
|
14,606,466 |
|
27,795,151 |
|
1,147,564 |
|
3,506,446 |
|
4,654,010 |
|
9,308,021 |
|
8,134,955 |
|
10,353,580 |
|
58,717,836 |
|
86,514,392 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,284 |
|
1,470,591 |
|
1,951,875 |
|
3,903,750 |
|
3,411,770 |
|
4,342,253 |
|
29,922,126 |
|
41,579,899 |
|
Foreign |
|
Emgesa S.A. E.S.P. |
|
180,638 |
|
17,507,497 |
|
17,688,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
416,214 |
|
1,384,363 |
|
1,800,577 |
|
3,320,662 |
|
8,125,215 |
|
8,256,413 |
|
139,675,879 |
|
159,378,169 |
|
443,752 |
|
1,355,909 |
|
1,799,661 |
|
3,599,322 |
|
3,145,709 |
|
4,003,630 |
|
26,625,123 |
|
37,373,784 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
652,512 |
|
2,170,311 |
|
2,822,823 |
|
5,205,909 |
|
12,738,165 |
|
12,943,848 |
|
67,013,806 |
|
97,901,728 |
|
696,742 |
|
2,128,935 |
|
2,825,677 |
|
5,651,354 |
|
4,939,128 |
|
6,286,163 |
|
41,804,535 |
|
58,681,180 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,995,692 |
|
6,637,844 |
|
8,633,536 |
|
15,922,148 |
|
38,959,371 |
|
39,588,448 |
|
128,025,125 |
|
222,495,092 |
|
2,134,683 |
|
6,522,643 |
|
8,657,326 |
|
17,314,652 |
|
15,132,532 |
|
19,259,586 |
|
189,789,582 |
|
241,496,352 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
956,132 |
|
2,405,370 |
|
3,361,502 |
|
6,435,714 |
|
19,069,273 |
|
23,877,508 |
|
|
|
49,382,495 |
|
587,547 |
|
1,141,652 |
|
1,729,199 |
|
3,388,622 |
|
3,650,500 |
|
4,548,717 |
|
26,604,782 |
|
38,192,621 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
9,543,000 |
|
8,701,669 |
|
18,244,669 |
|
213,837,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,837,549 |
|
4,433,373 |
|
13,546,417 |
|
17,979,790 |
|
35,959,581 |
|
213,283,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
249,242,637 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
2,169,821 |
|
7,217,013 |
|
9,386,834 |
|
17,311,397 |
|
50,668,664 |
|
59,466,428 |
|
|
|
127,446,489 |
|
2,297,667 |
|
7,020,648 |
|
9,318,315 |
|
18,636,629 |
|
16,287,903 |
|
103,768,726 |
|
|
|
138,693,258 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,758,444 |
|
10,118,583 |
|
11,877,027 |
|
21,414,704 |
|
47,005,622 |
|
38,062,267 |
|
29,525,291 |
|
136,007,884 |
|
748,281 |
|
6,563,199 |
|
7,311,480 |
|
14,149,547 |
|
10,774,238 |
|
15,419,226 |
|
63,946,179 |
|
104,289,190 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
1,284,413 |
|
4,272,071 |
|
5,556,484 |
|
10,247,385 |
|
25,073,983 |
|
25,478,853 |
|
106,205,282 |
|
167,005,503 |
|
235,793 |
|
720,479 |
|
956,272 |
|
1,912,545 |
|
1,671,512 |
|
2,127,379 |
|
93,203,249 |
|
98,914,685 |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
3,759,700 |
|
12,505,089 |
|
16,264,789 |
|
29,995,867 |
|
73,395,881 |
|
132,701,925 |
|
171,350,780 |
|
407,444,453 |
|
1,204,131 |
|
3,679,288 |
|
4,883,419 |
|
9,766,837 |
|
8,535,948 |
|
10,863,934 |
|
243,144,458 |
|
272,311,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,274,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,103,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
145,789,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841,410,723 |
|
· Finance leases by debtor
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
87,509,100-K |
|
Leasing Abengoa Chile |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
6.40 |
% |
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
Peru |
|
0-E |
|
Scotiabank |
|
Peru |
|
US$ |
|
5.16 |
% |
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gasatacama Holding Ltda. |
|
Chile |
|
96,976,410-5 |
|
Gasred S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
8.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than |
|
More than |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than |
|
Total non- |
|
91,081,000-6 |
|
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. |
|
514,759 |
|
1,713,147 |
|
2,227,906 |
|
4,107,030 |
|
9,667,747 |
|
7,325,181 |
|
5,083,160 |
|
26,183,118 |
|
554,228 |
|
1,680,476 |
|
2,234,704 |
|
4,463,401 |
|
3,896,027 |
|
4,901,794 |
|
16,518,373 |
|
29,779,595 |
|
Foreign |
|
Edegel S.A.A. |
|
2,204,779 |
|
6,628,821 |
|
8,833,600 |
|
14,084,254 |
|
30,098,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
44,182,396 |
|
2,200,935 |
|
8,439,132 |
|
10,640,067 |
|
32,300,512 |
|
10,101,808 |
|
15,689,299 |
|
10,665,225 |
|
68,756,844 |
|
96,830,980-3 |
|
Inversiones Gasatacama Holding Ltda. |
|
65,489 |
|
195,946 |
|
261,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,737 |
|
212,201 |
|
282,938 |
|
281,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,322,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,365,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,157,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,817,796 |
|
· Other loans by debtor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Country |
|
Type |
|
Effective |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Mitsubishi (secured liabilities) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
16.08% |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Mitsubishi (non-secured liabilities) |
|
Argentina |
|
US$ |
|
16.08% |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Foreign |
|
Other |
|
Argentina |
|
Ar$ |
|
17.17% |
|
96,827,970-K |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
96,601,250-1 |
|
Inversiones Centinela S.A. |
|
Chile |
|
US$ |
|
9.90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxpayer |
|
Name |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More |
|
More |
|
Total non- |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More |
|
More |
|
Total non- |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
17,408,628 |
|
8,223,739 |
|
25,632,367 |
|
516,235 |
|
37,523,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,040,232 |
|
4,181,796 |
|
5,441,296 |
|
9,623,092 |
|
18,442,282 |
|
14,377,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,819,941 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
56,194 |
|
945,146 |
|
1,001,340 |
|
1,164,650 |
|
12,332,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,497,239 |
|
4,181,796 |
|
5,441,296 |
|
9,623,092 |
|
18,442,282 |
|
14,377,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,819,940 |
|
Foreign |
|
Endesa Costanera S.A. |
|
1,542,295 |
|
1,517,680 |
|
3,059,975 |
|
1,011,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011,826 |
|
77,062 |
|
235,468 |
|
312,530 |
|
3,223,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,223,239 |
|
96,827,970-K |
|
Endesa Eco S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,395,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,688,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,688,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,693,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,944,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,558,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,551,572 |
|
APPENDIX No. 5 ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN FOREIGN CURRENCY:
This appendix is an integral part of Endesa Chiles financial statements
Assets and liabilities in foreign currency are as follows:
|
|
Foreign |
|
Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
currency |
|
currency |
|
12/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
52,510,094 |
|
79,287,119 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Colombian Peso |
|
1,280 |
|
279 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
46,804,371 |
|
58,805,331 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Peruvian Sol |
|
966,052 |
|
8,025,665 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Argentine Peso |
|
4,738,391 |
|
12,455,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other current receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
18,372,233 |
|
35,725,419 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
US Dollar |
|
18,372,233 |
|
35,725,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account receivable from related companies |
|
|
|
|
|
714,803 |
|
773,861 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
714,803 |
|
773,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
71,597,130 |
|
115,786,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment accounted for using equity method |
|
|
|
|
|
574,880,500 |
|
562,980,574 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
2,887,481 |
|
10,131,240 |
|
|
|
Argentine Peso |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
839,893 |
|
944,871 |
|
|
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
Peruvian Sol |
|
60,441,860 |
|
58,646,962 |
|
|
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
510,711,266 |
|
493,257,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
88,301,992 |
|
93,339,475 |
|
|
|
Peruvian Sol |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
72,931,068 |
|
75,920,260 |
|
|
|
Argentine Peso |
|
Chilean Peso |
|
15,370,924 |
|
17,419,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
663,182,492 |
|
656,320,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
734,779,622 |
|
772,106,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Foreign |
|
Functional currency |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than 10 years |
|
Total non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current financial liabilities |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
|
|
43,257,291 |
|
105,039,180 |
|
148,296,471 |
|
316,074,690 |
|
319,157,911 |
|
181,167,395 |
|
345,969,960 |
|
1,162,369,956 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Chilean Pesos |
|
16,174,193 |
|
46,935,449 |
|
63,109,642 |
|
262,907,288 |
|
216,379,053 |
|
127,580,318 |
|
339,797,970 |
|
946,664,629 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Peruvian Soles |
|
4,532,918 |
|
30,789,583 |
|
35,322,501 |
|
47,472,662 |
|
52,922,272 |
|
53,587,077 |
|
6,171,990 |
|
160,154,001 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Argentine Pesos |
|
22,550,180 |
|
27,314,148 |
|
49,864,328 |
|
5,694,740 |
|
49,856,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
55,551,326 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
43,257,291 |
|
105,039,180 |
|
148,296,471 |
|
316,074,690 |
|
319,157,911 |
|
181,167,395 |
|
345,969,960 |
|
1,162,369,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2009 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Non-Current |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Foreign |
|
Functional currency |
|
Less than |
|
More than |
|
Total |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than 5 |
|
More than 10 |
|
Total non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
ThCh$ |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current financial liabilities |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
|
|
43,554,407 |
|
296,269,060 |
|
339,823,467 |
|
418,096,478 |
|
631,476,249 |
|
340,737,569 |
|
298,969,772 |
|
1,689,280,068 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Chilean Pesos |
|
18,113,650 |
|
182,060,113 |
|
200,173,763 |
|
254,073,486 |
|
573,118,679 |
|
265,049,233 |
|
288,304,547 |
|
1,380,545,945 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Brazilian Reais |
|
1,018,392 |
|
67,854,542 |
|
68,872,934 |
|
26,976,832 |
|
14,097,354 |
|
25,725,061 |
|
|
|
66,799,247 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Peruvian Soles |
|
18,169,214 |
|
33,579,600 |
|
51,748,814 |
|
113,071,393 |
|
44,260,216 |
|
49,963,275 |
|
10,665,225 |
|
217,960,109 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Argentine Pesos |
|
6,253,151 |
|
12,774,805 |
|
19,027,956 |
|
23,974,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,974,767 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
43,554,407 |
|
296,269,060 |
|
339,823,467 |
|
418,096,478 |
|
631,476,249 |
|
340,737,569 |
|
298,969,772 |
|
1,689,280,068 |
|