FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
FORM 6-K
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of September, 2006
Commission File Number 1-11130
ALCATEL
(Translation of registrants name into English)
54, rue La Boétie
75008 Paris France
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ
Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1):
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7):
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o
No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects as of and for the Period Ended June 30, 2006.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS IFRS STANDARDS
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS IFRS STANDARDS
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS IFRS STANDARDS
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIGNATURE
2
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects as of and for the Period Ended June 30, 2006.
Forward-looking Information
This discussion of our Operational and Financial Review and Prospects contains forward-looking
statements based on beliefs of our management. We use the words anticipate, believe, expect,
may, intend, should, plan, project, or similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events
and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause the actual results to be
materially different, including, among others, changes in general economic and business conditions,
changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates, introduction of competing products, lack of
acceptance of new products or services and changes in business strategy. Such forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, the forecasts and targets included in this discussion
under the heading Operating and Financial Review and Prospects as of and for the Period Ended June
30, 2006 Overall Perspective, with respect to (i) our expectation that the carrier market will
grow in the second half of 2006, (ii) the additional costs associated with our current strategic
transactions with Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Thales are in line with our expectations and (iii)
the amount we would be required to pay in the future pursuant to our existing contractual
obligations and off-balance sheet contingent commitments, included in this discussion under the
heading Contractual obligations and off-balance sheet commitments.
Presentation of Financial Information
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements as of and for
the period ended June 30, 2006 (the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements) and the related notes presented elsewhere in this document. Our unaudited condensed
interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted in the European Union (IFRS), which differ in certain
significant ways from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). The unaudited
condensed interim consolidated financial statements are compliant with IAS 34 requirements. The
most significant differences that affect the presentation of our financial results relate to the
accounting treatment of business combinations before the date of transition to IFRS (January 1,
2004), capitalization of development costs, accounting of post-employment benefits, accounting for
share-based payment transactions, accounting of compound financial instruments, accounting for sale
and leaseback transactions, accounting for restructuring costs, accounting for inventory
write-downs, accounting for income taxes in interim periods and impacts of differences between IFRS
and U.S. GAAP on share in net assets of equity affiliates. For a discussion of the significant
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our unaudited condensed interim
consolidated financial statements, and a reconciliation of our net income (loss) for the period
ended June 30, 2006 and shareholders equity as of that date to U.S. GAAP, please refer to Notes 20
through 23 in our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this document.
3
Changes in Accounting Standards as of January 1, 2006
As a result of the publication of the Fair Value Option amendment to IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, effective January 1, 2006, certain marketable securities
previously included in the category of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are
now designated as financial assets available for sale. The impact of this change, had it been
applied in 2005, is presented in Note 7 Financial income (loss) and in the consolidated statement
of changes in shareholders equity in our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this document.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion in Operating and Financial Review and Prospects below is based on our unaudited
condensed interim consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with IFRS as
described in Note 1 thereto. Some of the accounting methods and policies used in preparing our
unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements under IFRS and the reconciliation of
our net income and shareholders equity to U.S. GAAP are based on complex and subjective
assessments by our management or on estimates based on past experience and assumptions deemed
realistic and reasonable based on the circumstances concerned. The actual value of our assets,
liabilities and shareholders equity and of our earnings could differ from the value derived from
these estimates if conditions changed and these changes had an impact on the assumptions adopted.
We believe that the accounting methods and policies listed below are the most likely to be affected
by these estimates and assessments:
Valuation allowance for inventories and work in progress
Inventories and work in progress are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Valuation allowances for inventories and work in progress are calculated based on an analysis of
foreseeable changes in demand, technology or the market, in order to determine obsolete or excess
inventories and work in progress.
The valuation allowances are accounted for in cost of sales or in restructuring costs depending on
the nature of the amounts concerned.
From 2000 to 2003, significant provisions for write-down of inventories and work in progress were
accounted for because of difficult market conditions and the abandonment of certain product lines.
The impact of these provisions on our income before tax is a net charge of 28 million for the
first six months of 2006 (a net charge of 18 million in 2005 and of 15 million for the
first six months of 2005). This amount represented new write-downs taken in the first half of
2006, which more than offset the reversal of existing provisions of 40 million due to asset
sales that occurred in the first half of 2006.
Because of the revival in the telecommunications market, our future results could continue to be
positively impacted by the reversal of provisions previously made.
Impairment of customer receivables and loans
An impairment loss is recorded for customer receivables and loans if the present value of the
future receipts is below the nominal value. The amount of the impairment loss reflects both the
customers ability to honor their debts and the age of the debts in question. A higher default rate
than estimated or the deterioration of our major customers creditworthiness could have an adverse
impact on our future results. Impairment losses on customer receivables were 221 million at
June 30, 2006 ( 228 million at December 31, 2005 and 260 million at June 30, 2005). The
impact of impairment losses for customer receivables and loans on income before tax is a net gain
of 5 million for the first six months of 2006 (a net gain of 25 million in 2005 and
28 million for the first six months of 2005).
Impairment losses on customer loans and other financial assets (assets essentially relating to
customer financing arrangements) were
887 million at June 30, 2006 (897 million at
December 31, 2005 and 918 million at June 30, 2005). The impact of these impairment losses on
income before tax is a net gain of 2 million for the first six months of 2006 (a net gain of
25 million in 2005 and 4 million for the first six months of 2005).
4
Capitalized development costs, goodwill and other intangible assets
The criteria for capitalizing development costs are set out in Note 1f to our unaudited condensed
interim consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document. Once capitalized,
these costs are amortized over the estimated lives of the products concerned.
The Group must therefore evaluate the commercial and technical feasibility of the development
projects and estimate the useful lives of the products resulting from the projects. Should a
product fail to substantiate these assumptions, the Group may be required to impair or write off
some of the capitalized development costs in the future.
The Group also has intangible assets acquired for cash or through business combinations and the
goodwill resulting from such combinations.
As indicated in Note 1g to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, in
addition to the annual goodwill impairment tests, timely impairment tests are carried out in the
event of indications of reduction in value of intangible assets held. Possible impairments are
based on discounted future cash flows and/or fair values of the assets concerned. A change in the
market conditions or the cash flows initially estimated can therefore lead to a review and a change
in the impairment loss previously recorded.
Net goodwill is 3,735 million at June 30, 2006 ( 3,772 million at December 31, 2005 and
3,896 million at June 30, 2005). Other intangible assets, net were 875 million at June
30, 2006 ( 819 million at December 31, 2005 and 808 million at June 30, 2005). The annual
impairment test for goodwill (Note 1g to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements) was performed during the second quarter of 2006 and resulted in no goodwill impairment
being recorded as of June 30, 2006.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, when events or changes in market conditions
indicate that tangible or intangible assets may be impaired, such assets are reviewed in detail to
determine whether their carrying value is lower than their recoverable value, which could lead to
recording an impairment loss (recoverable value is the higher of its value in use and its fair
value less costs to sell) (see Note 1g to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements). Value in use is estimated by calculating the present value of the future cash flows
expected to be derived from the asset. Fair value less costs to sell is based on the most reliable
information available (market statistics, recent transactions, etc.).
The planned closing of certain facilities, additional reductions in personnel and reductions in
market outlooks have been considered impairment triggering events in prior years. No significant
impairment losses have been recorded for the first six months of both 2006 and 2005.
When determining recoverable value of property, plant and equipment, assumptions and estimates are
made, based primarily on market outlooks, obsolescence and sale or liquidation disposal values. Any
change in these assumptions can have a significant effect on the recoverable amount and could lead
to a revision of recorded impairment losses.
Provision for warranty costs and other product sales reserves
Provisions for product sales cover probable liabilities arising from past and current sales
contracts and are mainly related to claims made by customers for non-fulfillment of contractual
obligations, warranty and retrofits, fines and penalties. Provisions are recorded for warranties
given to customers on our products or for expected losses and for penalties incurred in the event
of failure to meet contractual obligations on construction contracts. These provisions are
calculated based on historical return rates and warranty costs expensed as well as on estimates.
These provisions and subsequent changes to the provisions are recorded in cost of sales either when
revenue is recognized (provision for customer warranties) or, for construction contracts, when
revenue and expenses are recognized by reference to the stage of completion of the contract
activity. Costs and penalties that will be effectively paid can differ considerably from the
amounts initially reserved and could therefore have a significant impact on future results.
Product sales reserves represent 653 million at June 30, 2006, of which 151 million
relate to construction contracts (see Note 12 to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated
financial statements) ( 753 million and 173 million respectively at December 31, 2005).
For further information on the impact on net income (loss) of the change in these provisions, see
consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2005, Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities and Notes 12 and 15 to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements.
5
Deferred taxes
Deferred tax assets relate primarily to tax loss carry forwards and to deductible temporary
differences between reported amounts and the taxes bases of assets and liabilities. The assets
relating to the tax loss carry forwards are recognized if it is probable that the Group will
dispose of future taxable profits against which these tax losses can be set off.
At June 30, 2006, deferred tax assets were 1,670 million (of which 795 million relate to
the United States and 401 million to France). Evaluation of the Groups capacity to utilize
tax loss carry forwards relies on significant judgment. The Group analyzes the positive and
negative elements to conclude as to the probability of utilization in the future of these tax loss
carry forwards, which also consider the factors indicated in Note 1n to our unaudited condensed
interim consolidated financial statements. This analysis is carried out regularly in each tax
jurisdiction where significant deferred tax assets are recorded.
If future taxable results are considerably different from those forecast that support recording
deferred tax assets, the Group will be obliged to revise downwards or upwards the amount of the
deferred tax assets, which could have a significant impact on our balance sheet and net income
(loss).
Pension and retirement obligations and other employee and post-employment benefit
obligations
As indicated in Note 1k to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this document, the Group participates in defined contribution and defined
benefit plans for employees. Furthermore, certain other post-employment benefits, such as life
insurance and health insurance (mainly in the United States), are also reserved. All these
obligations are measured based on actuarial calculations relying upon assumptions, such as the
discount rate, return on plan assets, future salary increases, employee turnover and mortality
tables.
These assumptions are generally updated annually. At December 31, 2005, the weighted average
discount rate was 3.95%, the weighted average future salary increase was 3.34% and the weighted
average expected long-term return on assets was 4.28% (these assumptions are set forth in Note 25
to our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2005). Using the corridor method, only
actuarial gains and losses in excess of the greater of 10% of the present value of the defined
benefit obligation or 10% of the fair value of any plan assets are recognized over the expected
average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan. In accordance with the
option available under IFRS 1, cumulative actuarial gains and losses at the transition date have
been recognized in shareholders equity. The corridor method is therefore only applied as from
January 1, 2004.
The Group considers that the actuarial assumptions used are appropriate and supportable but changes
that will be made to them in the future could have, however, a significant impact on the amount of
such obligations and the Groups net income (loss). An increase of 0.5% in the discount rate at
December 31, 2005 (or a reduction of 0.5%) has a positive impact on 2005 net income of 8
million (or a negative impact of 8 million on net income). An increase of 0.5% in the assumed
rate of return on plan assets for 2005 (or a reduction of 0.5%) has a positive impact on 2005 net
income of 11 million (or a negative impact of 11 million on net income).
Revenue recognition
As indicated in Note 1o to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements,
revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or to be received when the
company has transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership of a product to the buyer.
For revenues and expenses generated from construction contracts, the Group applies the percentage
of completion method of accounting, provided certain specified conditions are met, based either on
the achievement of contractually defined milestones or on costs incurred compared with total
estimated costs. The determination of the stage of completion and the revenues to be recognized
rely on numerous estimations based on costs incurred and acquired experience. Adjustments of
initial estimates can, however, occur throughout the life of the contract, which can have significant
impacts on future net income (loss).
For arrangements to sell software licenses with services, software license revenue is recognized
separately from the related service revenue, provided the transaction adheres to certain criteria
(as prescribed by the AICPAs SOP 97-2), such as the existence of sufficient vendor-specific
objective evidence to determine the fair value of the various elements of the arrangement.
Determination of the fair value of the various elements of the arrangement relies also on
estimates, which if they had to be corrected, would have an impact on revenues and net income
(loss).
6
In the context of the present telecommunications market, it can be difficult to evaluate the
Groups capacity to recover receivables. Such evaluation is based on the customers
creditworthiness and on the Groups capacity to sell such receivables without recourse. If,
subsequent to revenue recognition, the recoverability of a receivable that had been initially
considered as likely becomes doubtful, a provision for an impairment loss is then recorded.
Derecognition of financial assets
A financial asset, as defined under IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, is
either totally or partially derecognized (removed from the balance sheet) when (i) we expect that
no further cash flow will be generated by it, (ii) we transfer substantially all risks and rewards
attached to the asset or (iii) we retain no control of the asset.
With respect to trade receivables, a transfer without recourse in case of payment default by the
debtor is regarded as at transfer of substantially all risks and rewards of ownership, thus making
such receivables eligible for derecognition, on the basis that risk of late payment is considered
marginal. Potential new interpretations in the future of the concept of substantial transfer of
risks and rewards could lead us to modify our current accounting treatment.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Overall Perspective
Overview of the first half of 2006. The first six months of 2006 were characterized by a dynamic
and growing telecommunications market. We have seen our revenues increase as a result of this
market environment and, in particular, due to our leading position in products and technologies
that will help our customers transform their networks to provide voice, data and video at very high
speeds to their end users. We call this network transformation triple play and our fixed line
business, where we supply access, optical, and IP data products, has benefited from this trend. In
our wireless business, we have seen revenue growth; however, we have also invested in new
technology which has not yet been significantly deployed in our customers networks. In addition,
we continue to operate in a highly competitive pricing environment. Both the high level of
investment and the competitive market environment have impacted our revenue and profitability in
the mobile segment. Our private communications business has recorded satisfactory revenue growth,
particularly in the rail communications and enterprise activities, partially offset by a continued
softness in the satellite sector. During the first six months of 2006 our revenues increased by
12.2% to 6,451 million. If there had been a constant euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate during
the first six months of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, our consolidated revenues
would have increased by approximately 10.7%. Our income (loss) from operating activities before
restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on
disposal of consolidated entities (we previously referred to this item as operating profit) was
461 million, or 7.1% of revenues, while our net income (attributable to equity holders of the
parent) was 284 million. Net cash, which is total gross cash and marketable securities less
total gross debt as recorded on our balance sheet, amounted to 980 million.
The first part of the year has been highlighted by a major strategic evolution which has placed
Alcatel at the forefront of the much needed industry consolidation. Our pending merger with Lucent
Technologies, Inc., which we announced on April 2, 2006, should provide enhanced earnings
opportunities for the combined company, thanks to the strong and complementary geographical and
technological attributes of both companies. The closing of the deal
is expected in the fourth quarter
of 2006. Our plan to transfer our satellite and security assets to Thales, which we announced on
April 5, 2006, should allow us to reinforce our industrial partnership and open new opportunities
for our communications technology in the defense and security markets. Closing for this
transaction is expected to occur in the second half of the year.
Outlook for the second half of 2006. Going into the second half of the year we expect to see the
carrier market growing in the mid single digit range for full year 2006. As we expect the pending
merger with Lucent Technologies to close during the fourth quarter of 2006, we are not providing
specific annual guidance.
Our third quarter will be a transition quarter where we expect revenues to grow year over year in
the mid single digit range (at the current structure). Income (loss) from operating activities
before restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on
disposal of consolidated entities should be close to the same amount as in the second quarter of
2006, taking into account increased investments in R&D and additional costs associated with the
strategic moves underway.
7
Highlights of recent transactions
Acquisition of Nortels UMTS business. On September 1, 2006, we announced the signing of a
non-binding memorandum of understanding with Nortel to acquire Nortels UMTS radio access business
(UTRAN) and related assets for $320 million.
Shareholders approval of the merger with Lucent Technologies. On September 7, 2006, our
shareholders approved all proposed resolutions related to the merger with Lucent Technologies at
our annual and extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.
Highlights of transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2006
Acquisition of equity stake in 2Wire. On January 27, 2006, we acquired a 27.5% stake in 2Wire, a
company specializing in home broadband network products, for $122 million.
Merger with Lucent Technologies. On April 2, 2006, we entered into a definitive merger agreement
with Lucent Technologies. The boards of directors and the shareholders of both companies have
approved the transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, Lucent shareholders will receive 0.1952
of an ADS (American Depositary Share) representing ordinary shares of Alcatel (as the combined
company) for every common share of Lucent that they hold. Upon completion of the merger, Alcatel
shareholders will own approximately 60% of the combined company and Lucent shareholders will own
approximately 40% of the combined company. The combined companys ordinary shares will continue to
be traded on the Euronext Paris and the ADSs, representing ordinary shares, will continue to be
traded on The New York Stock Exchange.
The combined company created by this merger will be incorporated in France, with its headquarters
located in Paris. The North American operations will be based in New Jersey, U.S.A., where Bell
Labs will remain headquartered. The board of directors of the combined company will be composed of
14 members and will have equal representation from each company, including Serge Tchuruk and
Patricia Russo, five of Alcatels current directors and five of Lucents current directors. The
board will also include two new independent European directors to be mutually agreed upon.
The combined company intends to form a specific U.S. subsidiary holding certain contracts with U.S.
government agencies and will be subject to reinforced confidentiality and security conditions. A
board of directors, comprising three independent U.S. citizens acceptable to the U.S. government,
will manage this subsidiary separately.
The merger is subject to customary regulatory and governmental reviews in the United States, Europe
and elsewhere (many of which have already been obtained) and other customary conditions. The
transaction is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. Until the merger is
completed, both companies will continue to operate their businesses independently.
Acquisition of VoiceGenie. During the second quarter of 2006, we acquired privately-held
VoiceGenie for 30 million in cash. Founded in 2000, VoiceGenie is a leader in voice self
service solutions, with a software platform based on Voice XML, an open standard used for
developing self-service applications by both enterprises and carriers.
Disposal of satellite subsidiaries, railway signaling, and integration and services activities for
mission-critical systems to Thales. On April 5, 2006, we announced that the board of directors of
Thales had approved the acquisition in principle of our satellite subsidiaries, railway signalling
business and our integration and services activities for mission-critical systems. With this
transaction, we would strengthen our position as a significant shareholder in Thales, with a 21.6%
stake, while Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault would keep its 5% share and the French State would
remain the majority shareholder with 27.1%.
The transaction primarily consists of the contribution by Alcatel to Thales of the following
assets:
1. In the Space sector:
|
- |
|
Our 67% stake in the capital of Alcatel Alenia Space (this joint venture company,
created in 2005, combined Alcatels and Finmeccanica S.p.A.s industrial space assets,
the latter holding a 33% stake). |
|
|
- |
|
Our 33% stake in the capital of Telespazio, a worldwide leader in satellite
services, whose majority stake of 67% is held by Finmeccanica. |
2. In the domain of critical systems for security:
|
- |
|
Our Transport Systems activities, which is a worldwide leader in signalling
solutions for rail transport and urban metros. |
|
|
- |
|
Our Systems Integration activities not dedicated to telecom operators, and covering
mainly the transport and energy sectors. |
8
The total revenues of these activities, based on our 2005 consolidated financial statements,
amounted to 2 billion. The workforce represents approximately 11,000 people, mainly in France,
Germany, Italy and Canada. All the assets to be included in the contemplated transaction are part
of our Private Communications segment.
Thales will pay Alcatel approximately 0.7 billion in cash upon closing the transaction,
subject to adjustment.
As of September 25, 2006, Alcatel and Thales had not entered into a binding contract with regard to
this transaction. An amendment to the shareholders agreement between the French State, Alcatel and
Dassault regarding the shareholding of Thales must be completed as part of the transaction. The
transaction will also be subject to customary regulatory approvals as well as approval from the
French State, Lucent and Finmeccanica, our partner in Alcatel Alenia Space and Telespazio.
Highlights of Transactions during 2005
Acquisitions
Acquisition of Native Networks. On March 17, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Native
Networks, Inc., a provider of optical Ethernet goods and services, for $55 million in cash.
Dispositions
Sale of electrical power systems business. On January 26, 2005, we completed the sale of our
electrical power business to Ripplewood, a U.S. private equity firm.
Sale of shareholding in Nexans. On March 16, 2005, we sold our shareholding in Nexans,
representing 15.1% of Nexans share capital, through a private placement.
Other Transactions
Amendment of credit facility. On March 15, 2005, we amended our existing syndicated revolving
1.3 billion credit facility by extending the maturity date from June 2007 to June 2009 with a
possible extension until 2011, eliminating one of the two financial covenants, reducing the cost of
the facility and reducing the overall amount to 1.0 billion.
Moodys upgrade of our long-term debt. On April 11, 2005, Moodys upgraded to Bal from Ba3 the
ratings for our long-term debt on the basis of cost savings achieved by us and our balance sheet
strength.
Merger of space activities. On July 1, 2005, we completed the merger of our space activities with
those of Finmeccanica, S.p.A., an Italian aerospace and defense company, through the creation of
two sister companies. We own approximately 67%, and Alenia Spazio, a unit of Finmeccanica, owns
approximately 33%, of the first company, Alcatel Alenia Space, that combines our respective
industrial space activities. Finmeccanica owns approximately 67%, and we own approximately 33%, of
the second company, Telespazio Holding, which combines our respective satellite operations and
service activities.
Exchange of our interest in joint venture with TCL Communication. On July 18, 2005, we exchanged
our 45% shareholding in our joint venture for mobile handsets with our partner, which resulted in
our owning 4.8% of TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited.
Consolidated Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to the Six
Months ended June 30, 2005
Before January 1, 2005 our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with
French GAAP. Effective January 1, 2005, we began preparing our financial statements in accordance
with IFRS in order to comply with European Union regulations. For a more detailed explanation of
our implementation of these requirements, see Presentation of Financial Information, above. The
following discussion is based on IFRS accounting standards.
Revenues. Revenues increased by 12.2% to 6,451 million for the first six months of 2006, as
compared to 5,752 million for the same period last year. Approximately 40% of our revenues are
denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar. When we translate these sales into euros for
accounting purposes, there is an exchange rate impact based on the relative value of the U.S.
dollar and the euro. During the first six months of 2006, the increase in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to the euro had a positive impact on our
9
revenues. If there had been a constant euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate during the first six months
of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 our consolidated revenues would have increased by
approximately 10.7%. This is based on applying (i) to our sales made directly in U.S. dollars or
currencies linked to U.S. dollars effected during the first half of 2006, the average exchange rate
that applied for the same period in 2005, instead of the average exchange rate that applied for
such period in 2006, and (ii) to our exports (mainly from Europe) effected during the first half of
2006 which are denominated in U.S. dollars and for which we enter into hedging transactions, our
average euro/U.S. dollar hedging rate that applied for the same period in 2005. Our management
believes that providing our investors with our consolidated revenues for the first half of 2006 in
constant euro/U.S. dollar exchange rates facilitates the comparison of the evolution of our
revenues with that of the industry. The table below sets forth our revenues as reported, the
conversion and hedging impact of the euro/U.S. dollar and our revenues at a constant rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
months |
|
months |
|
|
|
|
ending 2006 |
|
ending 2005 |
|
% of Change |
Revenues as reported |
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Conversion impact euro/U.S. dollar |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
Hedging impact euro/U.S. dollar |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
Revenues at constant rate |
|
|
6,369 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
Within the fixed communications segment, revenues grew in all businesses except for our traditional
fixed line voice switching activity, which continues to decline. The revenue increase in our fixed
communications segment is due to the transformation of the telecommunications network to an
Internet Protocol (IP)-based architecture and the demand for Alcatels products in the access,
optical, and IP carrier data sectors to build out this new network. The increased revenue in our
mobile communications segment, in particular our GSM(2/2.5G) product offering for network
infrastructure build-out, came primarily from business in the developing regions of the world.
Revenues were strong across all business lines in our mobile communications segment with the
exception of our wireless voice switching business, which is declining due to the shift to next
generation products. In the private communications segment, increases in both our enterprise and
rail communications businesses were slightly offset by the decline in our satellite activities.
Revenue for the first half of 2006 by geographical market (calculated based upon the location of
the subsidiary that recorded the revenue) was as follows: revenues in Europe increased by 5.0% to
2,939 million compared to 2,800 million in the same period last year; revenues in Asia
Pacific increased by 10.7% to 938 million compared to 847 million in the same period last
year; revenues in North America increased by 50.4% to 1,238 million compared to 823
million in the same period last year; revenues in the rest of the world increased by 4.2% to
1,336 million compared to 1,282 million in the same period last year. In the first half of
2006, Europe accounted for 45.6% of revenues by geographical market while Asia Pacific, North
America, and the rest of the world accounted for 14.5%, 19.2% and 20.7%, respectively. This
compares with the following percentages of revenues by geographical market for the first half of
2005: Europe 48.7%, Asia Pacific 14.7%, North America 14.3%, and the rest of the world
22.3%.
Gross profit. During the first half of 2006, gross profit amounted to 34.2% of revenues or
2,207 million, compared to 36.0% of revenues or 2,068 million in the same period last year.
The decline in gross profit as a percentage of revenues is due primarily to the increased pricing
pressures we experienced in some of our markets. The decrease in both our fixed and variable costs
related to cost of sales stemming from our ongoing efforts to streamline our organization were not
sufficient to offset the price decreases over the period.
Administrative and selling expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, administrative and
selling expenses were stable at 1,017 million or 15.8% of revenues compared to 1,013
million or 17.6% of revenues in the same period last year. The decrease in administrative and
selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues compared to the first six months of 2005 is
primarily attributable to fixed costs reductions across all business activities.
Research and development costs. Research and development costs increased to 729 million for
the first six months of 2006 compared to 685 million in the same period last year. As a
percentage of revenues, R&D costs for the first six months of 2006 decreased slightly to 11.3%,
compared to 11.9% in the same period last year.
Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of
capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of consolidated entities. Income (loss) from
operating activities before restructuring, share-based payments,
10
impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of consolidated entities (we
previously referred to this item as operating profit) benefited from operating leverage generated
by volume, recording significant contributions from the IP data and access businesses in the fixed
communications segment. It amounted to 461 million or 7.1% of revenues for the first six
months of 2006 compared to 370 million for the same period last year, which represented 6.4%
of revenues.
Provision reversals impacted income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities by 87 million in the first half of 2006 of which 83 million related
to reversals of product sales reserves ( 108 million and 99 million, respectively, in the
first half of 2005). Of the 83 million, 16 million mainly related to reductions in
probable penalties due to contract delays or other contractual issues or in estimated amounts based
upon statistical and historical evidence. 23 million of reversals are related to warranty
provisions due to revision of our original estimate for warranty provision regarding warranty
period and costs. This revision, in turn, was due mainly to the earlier than expected renewal of
products by the customer, as a result of technological obsolescence or to better performance than
anticipated. The remaining 44 million of reversals mainly related to reversals of contract
loss provisions, due to lower estimated remaining costs to be incurred.
In the first half of 2006, new product sales reserves of 153 million were recorded, which did
not fully offset product sales reserve reversals of 83 million that occurred in first half of
2006, causing a net negative impact of 70 million on income (loss) from operating activities
before restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on
disposal of consolidated entities. In the same period last year, income (loss) was positively
impacted by 1 million from product sales reserves and reversals, representing 98 million
of new product sales reserves, offset by 99 million of product sales reserve reversals.
Share-based payment (stock option plans). Share-based payments representing expensed employee
stock options amounted to 30 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to 38
million in the same period of 2005.
Restructuring costs. Restructuring costs were 31 million for the first six months of 2006,
compared to 49 million for the same period last year. This decrease is due in part to a
revaluation of restructuring needs following the leasing of vacant premises during the first six
months of 2006. The restructuring costs incurred during the first six months of 2006 relate
primarily to restructuring plans in Western Europe, primarily Germany, Italy, and France. Also
included within restructuring costs is impairment of goodwill. Impairment of goodwill for the
first six months of 2006 amounted to 4 million due to an assessment of discontinued
activities. There was not impairment of goodwill for the same period in 2005.
Income (loss) from operating activities. Income (loss) from operating activities amounted to
400 million in the first six months of 2006 compared to 283 million during the same period of
2005 due to higher income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring, share-based
payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of consolidated
entities, coupled with lower charges for share-based payments and restructuring costs as discussed
above.
Finance costs. Finance costs amounted to 47 million in the first six months of 2006 compared
to 50 million in the same period of 2005 and included 107 million of interest paid on our
gross financial debt, offset by 60 million in interest earned on cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities, resulting in a net financial cost of 47 million. In the same period
last year, net financial costs amounted to 50 million resulting from 110 million of
interest paid on our gross financial debt, offset by
60 million in interest earned on cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities.
Other financial income (expense). Other financial expense amounted to 19 million in the first
half of 2006 compared to financial income of 73 million in the same period last year. This
decrease is due primarily to the capital gains generated by the disposal of our equity stake in
Nexans and Mobilrom during the first six months of 2005.
Share in net income (losses) of equity affiliates. Share in net income of equity affiliates
amounted to 21 million during the first six months of 2006 compared to a loss of 23
million in the same period last year. The loss during the first six months of 2005 resulted from a
loss generated by our handset joint venture with TCL.
Income before tax and discontinued operations. Income before tax and discontinued operations
amounted to 355 million compared to 283 million in the same period last year,
Income tax expense. We had an income tax expense of 56 million for the first six months of
2006, compared to an income tax benefit of 76 million for the same period last year. The
expense for the first six months of 2006 is due to changes in provisions for tax litigation and to
the increase in countries with respect to which we have no tax loss carry forwards whereas, based
on forecasted
11
tax results of different subsidiaries in the Group, net deferred tax assets of 87 million were
recorded during the first six months of 2005, mainly in Europe and North America.
Income from continuing operations. Income from continuing operations amounted to 299 million
in the first six months of 2006 compared to 359 million in the same period last year.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations amounted to 14
million during the first six months of 2006 compared to a loss of 15 million in the same
period last year. There were no discontinued operations in either 2006 or 2005. However, the
initial capital gain (loss) on discontinued operations that were sold in 2004 was adjusted in each
of 2006 and 2005 due to developments in ongoing legal proceedings related to these disposals.
Net income attributable to equity holders of parent.
Net income after minority interests of
29 million amounted to 284 million compared to 320 million, after minority interests of
24 million in the same period last year.
Results of Operations by Business Segment for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to the
Six Months ended June 30, 2005
The organizational chart below sets forth our three business segments and their principal business
activities since January 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications |
|
Mobile Communications |
|
Private Communications |
|
|
Access Networks
|
|
|
|
Mobile Radio
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions |
|
|
Fixed Solutions
|
|
|
|
Mobile Solutions
|
|
|
|
Space Solutions |
|
|
Internet Protocol
|
|
|
|
Wireless Transmission
|
|
|
|
Transport Solutions |
|
|
Optical Networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration and Services |
The table below sets forth the revenues (before elimination of inter-segment sales, except for
Total Group results and Other and Eliminations), income (loss) from operating activities before
restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on
disposal of consolidated entities and capital expenditures for tangible assets for each of our
business segments for the first six months of 2006 and for the first six months of 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
Mobile |
|
Private |
|
Other & |
|
Total |
|
|
Communications |
|
Communications |
|
Communications |
|
Eliminations |
|
Group |
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
6,451 |
|
Income (loss) from operating activities
before restructuring, share-based
payments, impairment of capitalized
development costs and gain on disposal
of consolidated entities |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
461 |
|
Capital expenditures for tangible assets |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
5,752 |
|
Income (loss) from operating activities
before restructuring, share-based
payments, impairment of capitalized
development costs and gain on disposal
of consolidated entities |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
370 |
|
Capital expenditures for tangible assets |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Fixed Communications
Revenues in our fixed communications segment increased by 19.2% to 2,636 million compared to
2,211 million in the same period last year. This increase is due to the strong customer
demand for the transformation of customers telecommunications network to an all Internet Protocol
(IP) architecture. This new system will transport voice, data, and video services (referred to as
triple play services in the industry) over the customers network. As a result of this network
transformation, we are recording revenue increases in our access, optical and IP carrier data
product lines, only slightly offset by the continuing decline in our traditional fixed line voice
switching activity.
12
The fixed communications segments income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities was 243 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to 170
million in the same period last year. This increase is due to a significant contribution across
all product lines with the exception of our traditional fixed voice switching activity, with a
particularly good performance in our access and IP carrier data businesses.
Mobile Communications
Revenues in our mobile communications segment increased by 9.6% to 1,915 million in the first
six months of 2006 compared to 1,747 million in the same period last year. This increase is
primarily due to the continued growth in emerging markets such as Africa, China and the Middle East
where operators are building out their wireless infrastructure. We also recorded significant growth
in our mobile applications business where we supply products and services for payment, video and
music. Our wireless transmission activity, which is primarily microwave transmission, returned to
growth with good customer acceptance of its new product portfolio. This increase was offset by the
decline in our traditional core wireless voice switching business as the market demand shifts to
next generation technologies.
The mobile communications segments income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities was 137 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to 181
million in the same period last year. This decrease is due primarily to increased investment in
next generation technologies and an intensely competitive pricing environment.
Private Communications
Revenues in our private communications segment increased by 6.0% to 1,939 million in the first
six months of 2006 compared to 1,829 million in the same period last year. This increase is
due primarily to revenue increases in our enterprise and rail communications business and to a
lesser extent, in our integration and services activity. The satellite revenues decreased due to
low order backlog.
The private communications segments income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities was 99 million in the first six months of 2006 compared to 93
million in the same period last year. This increase is due primarily to an improvement in our rail
communications business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Cash Flow for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Cash Flow Overview
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by 729 million during the first six months of 2006 to
3,781 million at June 30, 2006 compared to the cash and cash equivalents as of December 31,
2005. This decrease was mainly due to net cash used by investing activities of 362 million,
due primarily to capital expenditures amounting to 306 million, and to cash used by the
increase in operating working capital which amounted to 534 million, which more than offset
the net cash provided by operating activities before changes in working capital, interests and
taxes, which amounted to 459 million.
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities before
changes in working capital, interests and taxes was 459 million compared to 242 million
for the first six months of 2005. This increase is primarily due to our positive net income before
tax and discontinued operations of 355 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to
283 million in the same period last year. The 284 million of net income attributable to
the equity holders of the parent is adjusted for financial, tax and non-cash items, primarily
depreciation and amortization, net gain on disposal of non-current assets, changes in fair values
and share based payments, and adjusted further for cash outflows that had been previously reserved
(mainly for ongoing restructuring programs). The net gain on disposal of non-current assets was
55 million, consisting mainly of real estate assets, compared to a gain of 136 million in
the same period last year, from the sale of our holdings in Nexans and of real estate assets. The
cash outflows for restructuring amounted to 140 million for the first six months of 2006
compared to 235 million for the first six months of 2005. Net cash used by operating
activities was 171 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to 192 million
during the same
13
period last year. These amounts take into account the cash used by the increase in operating
working capital which amounted to 534 million for the first six months of 2006 and 423
million during the same period last year, reflecting our increased revenue performance as well as
our expectations for revenue growth in the coming quarters.
Net
Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities. Net cash used by
investing activities was 362 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to a net cash provided of 71 million
during the same period last year. This increase in net cash used is mainly due to changes in
marketable securities which represented net cash outflows of 93 million for the first six
months of 2006 compared to cash proceeds of 258 million during the same period last year.
Capital expenditures amounted to approximately 300 million for each of the two periods
presented. Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets amounted to 90 million
for the first six
months of 2006 compared to 9 million in the same period last year (due mainly to disposal of
various real estate assets).
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities. Net cash used by financing activities amounted
to 155 million for the first six months of 2006 compared to net cash used of 298 million
in the same period last year. The main reason for this change was the more limited use of cash to
decrease our long-term debt (
115 million for the first six months of 2006, compared with
259 million for the first six months of 2005), including by repurchasing debt.
Disposed of or discontinued operations. Disposed of or discontinued operations represented a net
cash proceed of 2 million for the first six months of 2006, compared with 14 million in
the same period last year.
Capital Resources
Resources and Cash Flow Outlook. We derive our capital resources from a variety of sources,
including the generation of positive cash flow from on-going operations, on-going divestitures of
assets considered to be non-core to our main telecommunications activities, the issuance of debt
and equity in various forms, and banking facilities including the revolving credit facility of
1,000 million maturing in June 2009 and on which we have not drawn (see Syndicated Facility
below). Our ability to draw upon these resources is dependent upon a variety of factors, including
our customers ability to make payments on outstanding accounts receivable, the perception of our
credit quality by debtors and investors, our ability to meet the financial covenant for our
syndicated facility and debt and equity market conditions generally.
Our short-term cash requirements are primarily related to funding our operations, including our
restructuring program, capital expenditures and short-term debt repayments. We believe that our
cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments, of 4,500 million as of June 30,
2006 are sufficient to fund our cash requirements for the next twelve months.
During 2006 we expect to make cash outlays for our restructuring programs of approximately 250
million and to make capital expenditures, which should be approximately 700 million, including
research and development capitalization. We will also repay our 7.00% bonds maturing in December
2006 that we did not previously repurchase ( 403 million as of June 30, 2006). In addition,
our expected growth in revenues in 2006 compared to 2005 may result in additional cash requirements
linked to an increase in working capital.
We can provide no assurance that our actual cash requirements will not exceed our currently
expected cash outlays. If we cannot generate sufficient cash from operations to meet cash
requirements in excess of our current expectations, we might be required to obtain supplemental
funds through additional operating improvements or through external sources, such as capital market
proceeds (if conditions are considered favorable by us), assets sales or financing from third
parties, the availability of which is dependent upon a variety of factors, as noted above. During
2006 we are continuing our bond repurchase program targeted at short term maturities.
Credit Ratings. As of September 25, 2006, our credit ratings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
Rating Agency |
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
|
Outlook |
|
Last Update |
Standard & Poors
|
|
BB
|
|
B
|
|
On Credit Watch,
negative implication
|
|
March 24, 2006 |
Moodys
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Not Prime
|
|
On Review, negative
implication
|
|
April 3, 2006 |
14
Standard & Poors. On March 10, 2006, Standard & Poors changed Alcatels long-term debt credit
rating (BB) outlook from Outlook Stable to Outlook Positive. However, on March 24, 2006, following
Alcatels announcement of its discussions with Lucent Technologies of a possible merger of the two
companies, Standard & Poors placed Alcatels credit rating under observation, considering that, if
the merger was consummated, a downgrading of the long-term debt rating may be envisaged due to the
financial structure of the combined entity. The ratings themselves (BB and B) remain unchanged from
the ratings upgrade on November 10, 2004. The rating grid of Standard & Poors ranges from AAA
(the strongest rating) to D (the weakest rating). Our BB rating is in the BB category, which also
includes BB+ and BB- ratings. Standard & Poors gives the following definition to the BB category:
[a]n obligation rated BB is less vulnerable to non payment than other speculative issues.
However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or
economic conditions, which could lead to the obligors inadequate capacity to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation. Debt rated B is more vulnerable to non payment than debt rated BB,
but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligors capacity or
willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
Moodys. On April 3, 2006, Moodys put Alcatels credit rating under review in view of a possible
downgrading of its long-term debt rating (Ba1, Outlook Positive). This action followed Alcatels
confirmation of discussions with Lucent Technologies regarding a possible merger and was motivated
by the strategic and operational changes that Alcatel would have to undergo as a result of the
merger. The ratings themselves (Ba1 and NP) remained unchanged from the ratings upgrade on April
11, 2005. The rating grid of Moodys ranges from Aaa which is considered to carry the smallest
degree of investment risk to C, which is the lowest rated class. Alcatels Ba1 rating is in the Ba
category which also includes Ba2 and Ba3 ratings. Moodys gives the following definition of its Ba
category: debt which is rated Ba is judged to have speculative elements and is subject to
substantial credit risk.
We can provide no assurances that our credit ratings will not be reduced in the future by Standard
& Poors, Moodys or similar rating agencies, especially in light of the pending merger with
Lucent. In addition, a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and
each rating should be evaluated separately of any other rating. Our current short-term and
long-term credit ratings as well as any possible future lowering of our ratings may result in
additional higher financing costs and in reduced access to the capital markets.
Our short-term debt rating allows us a limited access to the commercial paper market.
At June 30, 2006, our total financial debt (excluding interest derivatives accounted for in other
assets and liabilities) amounted to 3,545 million compared to 3,798 million at December
31, 2005.
Short-term Debt. At June 30, 2006, we had 1,244 million of short-term financial debt
outstanding, which included 554 million of bonds and 149 million in commercial paper,
with the remainder representing other bank loans and lines of credit and other financial debt and
accrued interest payable.
Long-term Debt. At June 30, 2006, we had 2,301 million of long-term financial debt
outstanding.
Rating Clauses Affecting our Debt. Alcatels outstanding bonds do not contain clauses that could
trigger an accelerated repayment in the event of a lowering of its credit ratings. However, the
1.2 billion bond issue maturing in December 2006 includes a step up rating change clause,
which provides that the interest rate is increased by 150 basis points if Alcatels ratings fall
below investment grade. This clause was triggered when Alcatels credit rating was lowered to below
investment grade status in July 2002. The 150 basis point increase in the interest rate from 7% to
8.5% became effective in December 2002, and was first applied to the payment of the December 2003
coupon. This bond issue also contains a step down rating change clause that provides that the
interest rate will be decreased by 150 basis points if Alcatels ratings with both agencies move
back to investment grade level. However, since this condition had not been met as of June 30, 2006,
we were unable to take advantage of the step down clause during the period.
Syndicated Facility. The availability of our three year, multi-currency syndicated revolving
credit facility of 1,000 million with a maturity of June 2009 does not depend upon our credit
ratings. At June 30, 2006, we had not drawn on this facility and it remained undrawn at September
28, 2006. Our ability to draw on this facility is conditioned upon our compliance with a financial
covenant linked to the capacity of Alcatel to generate sufficient cash to repay our net debt. We
test this covenant every quarter. As the Group had cash and cash equivalents in excess of its
gross financial debt at March 31 and June 30, 2006, we were in compliance with this covenant at
these dates. We can provide no assurance that we will remain compliant with such covenant in the
future.
15
Contractual obligations and off-balance sheet contingent commitments
Contractual obligations. We have certain contractual obligations that extend beyond 2005. Among
these obligations we have long-term debt, capital leases, operating leases, commitments to purchase
fixed assets, interest on long-term debt and other unconditional purchase obligations. Our total
contractual cash obligations at June 30, 2006 for these items are presented below based upon the
minimum payments we will have to make in the future under such contracts and firm commitments.
Amounts related to financial debt and capital lease obligations are fully reflected in our
unaudited interim consolidated balance sheet included in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Deadline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual payment obligations |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009-2010 |
|
|
2011 and after |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial debt (excluding capital leases) |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
Equity component of Oceane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal included in our balance sheet |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
Commitments to purchase fixed assets |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Unconditional purchase obligations(a) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub total not included in our balance sheet |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other firm commitments result mainly from purchase obligations related to multi-year
equipment supply contracts linked to the sale of businesses or plants to third parties. |
Off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies. On June 30, 2006, our off-balance sheet
commitments and contingencies amounted to 2,749 million, consisting primarily of 1,881
million in undertakings on long-term contracts for the supply of telecommunications equipment and
services. Generally we provide these undertakings to back performance bonds issued to customers
through financial institutions. These performance bonds and counter-guarantees are standard
industry practice and are routinely provided in long-term supply contracts. If certain events occur
subsequent to our including these commitments within our off-balance sheet contingencies, such as
the delay in promised delivery or claims related to an alleged failure by us to perform on our
long-term contracts, or the failure by one of our customers to meet its payment obligations, we
reserve the estimated risk on our consolidated balance sheet under the line item Reserves for
product sales (see Note 12 and Note 15 to our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial
statements) or in inventory reserves. Not included in the 2,749 million of off-balance sheet
commitments and contingencies is a 600 million guarantee granted to the bank implementing our
cash pooling program. This guarantee covers any intraday debit position that could result from the
daily transfers between our central treasury account and our subsidiaries accounts. Also not
included in the 2,749 million is our contingent liability pursuant to the securitization of
other accounts receivable and the sale of a carry-back receivable described below.
Off-balance sheet contingent commitments, which for purposes of the table below include only
performance guarantees issued by us to financial institutions and exclude our commitment to provide
further customer financing (as described below), are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Guarantees given on contracts made by Group entities and by non-consolidated subsidiaries(1) |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
Other contingent commitments (2) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total Contingent commitments(3) |
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
Secured borrowings(4) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total off-balance sheet commitments and secured borrowings(3) |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount is not reduced by any amounts that may be recovered under recourse or similar
provisions, guarantees received, or insurance proceeds, as explained more fully below. Of this
amount, 190 million as of June 30, 2006 and 228 million as of June 30, 2005
represent undertakings we provided on contracts of non-consolidated companies. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the 601 million are: 101 million of guarantees provided to tax
authorities in connection with tax assessments contested by us, 3 million of commitments
of our banking subsidiary, Electro Banque, to third parties providing financing to |
16
|
|
|
|
|
non-consolidated entities, 90 million of commitments related to leasing or sale and
lease-back transactions, and 407 million of various guarantees given by certain subsidiaries
in the Group. |
|
|
|
Included in the 721 million are: 90 million of guarantees provided to tax authorities
in connection with tax assessments contested by us, 3 million of commitments of our banking
subsidiary, Electro Banque, to third parties providing financing to non-consolidated entities,
102 million of commitments related to leasing or sale and lease-back transactions, and
625 million of various guarantees given by certain subsidiaries in the Group. |
|
(3) |
|
Excluding our commitment to provide further customer financing, as described below. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this item represent borrowings and advance payments received which are secured
through security interests or similar liens granted by us. The borrowings are reflected in the
table under the heading Contractual obligations, above. |
The amounts of guarantees given on contracts reflected in the preceding table represent the maximum
potential amounts of future payments (undiscounted) we could be required to make under current
guarantees granted by the Group. These amounts do not reflect any amounts that may be recovered
under recourse, collateralization provisions in the guarantees or guarantees given by customers for
the Groups benefit. In addition, most of the parent company guarantees and performance bonds given
to our customers are insured; therefore, the estimated exposure related to the guarantees set forth
in the preceding table may be reduced by insurance proceeds that we may receive in case of a claim.
Commitments related to product warranties and pension and post retirement benefits are not included
in the preceding table. These commitments are fully reflected in our unaudited condensed interim
consolidated financial statements. Contingent liabilities arising out of litigation, arbitration or
regulatory actions are not included in the preceding table either, with the exception of those
linked to the guarantees given on our long-term contracts.
Commitments related to contracts that have been cancelled or interrupted due to the default or
bankruptcy of the customer are included in the line item Guarantees given on contracts made by
Group entities and by non-consolidated subsidiaries as long as the legal release of the guarantee
is not obtained.
Guarantees given on third party long-term contracts could require us to make payments to the
guaranteed party based on a non-consolidated companys failure to perform under an agreement. The
fair value of these contingent liabilities, corresponding to the premium to be received by the
guarantor for issuing the guarantee, was 2 million as of June 30, 2006.
Customer Financing. Based on standard industry practice, from time to time we extend financing to
our customers by granting extended payment terms, making direct loans and providing guarantees to
third-party financing sources. As of June 30, 2006, net of reserves, we had provided customer
financing of approximately 348 million. This amount includes 338 million of customer
deferred payments and accounts receivable, and 10 million of other financial assets. In
addition, we had outstanding commitments to make further direct loans or provide guarantees to
financial institutions in an amount of approximately 122 million.
More generally, as part of our business we routinely enter into long-term contracts involving
significant amounts to be paid by our customers over time.
Sale of carry-back receivable. In May 2002, we sold to a credit institution a carry-back receivable
with a face value of 200 million resulting from the choice to carry back tax losses from prior
years. The cash received from this sale amounted to 149 million, corresponding to the
discounted value of this receivable, that matures in five years. Under IFRS the carry-back
receivable is not de-recognized but is reported on the asset side of the balance sheet, as an
other non current asset, at its discounted value using the discount rate applied in the sale
transaction by the intervening credit institution, and as a financial liability at its discounted
value using the French State bonds discount rate, on the liability side of the balance sheet.
We are required to indemnify the purchaser in case of any error or inaccuracy concerning the amount
or nature of the carry-back receivable sold. The sale would be retroactively cancelled if future
changes in law resulted in a substantial change in the rights attached to the carry-back receivable
sold.
Securitization of accounts receivables. In December 2003, we entered into a securitization program
for the sale of customer receivables without recourse. Eligible receivables are sold to a special
purpose vehicle, which benefits from a bank financing, and from a subordinated financing from our
Group representing an over-collateralization determined on the basis of the risk profile of the
17
portfolio of receivables sold. This special purpose vehicle is fully consolidated under IFRS. The
receivables sold at June 30, 2006, which amounted to 75 million ( 69 million as of June
30, 2005), are therefore maintained in the consolidated balance sheet. At June 30, 2006, the
maximum amount of bank financing that we could obtain through the
sale of receivables was
150
million. The actual amount of such funding for each receivable is a percentage of the amount of the
receivable and the percentage varies depending on the quality of the receivables sold. The purpose
of this securitization program is to optimize the management and recovery of receivables, in
addition to providing extra financing.
Customer Credit Approval Process and Risks. We engage in a thorough credit approval process prior
to providing financing to our customers or guarantees to financial institutions, which provide
financing to our customers. Any significant undertakings have to be approved by a central Risk
Assessment Committee, independent from our commercial departments. We continually monitor and
manage the credit we have extended to our customers, and attempt to limit credit risks by, in some
cases, obtaining security interests or by securitizing or transferring to banks or export credit
agencies a portion of the risk associated with this financing.
Although, as discussed above, we engage in a rigorous credit approval process and have taken
actions to limit our exposure to customer credit risks, the global downturn and deterioration of
the telecommunications industry through 2003 caused certain of our customers to experience
financial difficulties and others to file for protection under bankruptcy laws. Upon the financial
failure of a customer, we realized losses on extended credit given and loans made to the customer,
on guarantees provided for the customer, losses relating to our commercial risk exposure under
long-term contracts, as well as the loss of the customers ongoing business. If economic conditions
and the telecommunications industry in particular deteriorate once again, we may in the future
realize similar losses. In such a context, should additional customers fail to meet their
obligations to us, we may experience reduced cash flows and losses in excess of reserves, which
could materially adversely impact our results of operations and financial position.
Capital Expenditures. We expect our capital expenditures in 2006 to be approximately 700
million, including capitalization of research and development expenses. We believe that our current
cash and cash equivalents, cash flows and funding arrangements provide us with adequate flexibility
to meet our short-term and long-term financial obligations and to pursue our capital expenditure
program as planned. We base this assessment on current and expected future economic and market
conditions. Should economic and market conditions deteriorate, we may be required to engage in
additional restructuring efforts and seek additional sources of capital, which may be difficult if
there is no continued improvement in the market environment and given our limited ability to access
the fixed income market at this point. In addition, as mentioned in Capital Resources above, if
we do not meet the financial covenant contained in our syndicated facility, we may not be able to
rely on this funding arrangement to meet our cash needs.
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
At June 30, 2006, our exposure to market risks was not materially different from our exposure at
the end of last year, as described in our 2005 Form 20-F.
Research and Development
Costs. In the first half of 2006, our research and development costs, net of the impact of the
capitalization of research and development expenses, totaled 729 million (11.3% of
consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006) compared to costs of 685
million in the first six months of 2005 (11.9% of consolidated net sales for the six months ended
June 30, 2005).
18
ALCATEL AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
|
|
|
F-21 |
|
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
Other |
|
|
F-22 |
|
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
F-1
ALCATEL AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2006 (a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions except per share information) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
8,244 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 423 |
) |
|
|
(4,244 |
) |
|
|
(3,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
Research and development expenses before capitalization of development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
Impact of capitalization of development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring, share-based
payments, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment (stock option plans) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Income (loss) from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests relative to gross financial debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
Interests relative to cash, cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Finance costs |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Other financial income (expense) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
Share in net income (losses) of equity affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax and discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of the parent per share (in euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Net income (loss) (before discontinued operations) attributable to equity holders
of the parent per share (in euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Net income (loss) of discontinued operations per share (in euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $ 1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
F-2
ALCATEL AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,773 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
4,308 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 261 |
) |
|
|
(3,334 |
) |
|
|
(3,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share in net assets of equity affiliates |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Other non-current financial assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,142 |
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
9,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories and work in progress, net |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Amounts due from customers on construction contracts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Trade receivables and related accounts, net |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
Advances and progress payments |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Other current assets, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Current income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Marketable securities, net |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,652 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
|
|
11,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,794 |
|
|
|
20,185 |
|
|
|
21,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $ 1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
F-3
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capital stock
( 2 nominal value: 1,430,777,113 ordinary shares issued
as of June 30, 2006 and 1,428,541,640 ordinary shares issued as of
December 31, 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,656 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
Less treasury stock at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,005 |
) |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
Retained earnings, fair value and other reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,475 |
) |
|
|
(3,502 |
) |
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( 49 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
Net income attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity Attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,161 |
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
8,773 |
|
|
|
6,865 |
|
|
|
6,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions, retirement indemnities and other post-retirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
Bonds and notes issued, long term |
|
|
(14), |
(16) |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
Other long term debt |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Customers deposits and advances |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
Amounts due to customers on construction contracts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Trade payables and related accounts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
4,696 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
Current income taxes liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
9,157 |
|
|
|
9,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,794 |
|
|
|
20,185 |
|
|
|
21,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $ 1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
F-4
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2006 (a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)- Attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities before changes in working
capital, interest and taxes |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories and work in progress |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables and related accounts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in advances and progress payments |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in customers deposits and advances |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
Change in other assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided (used) by operating activities before interests and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Interest (paid) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Taxes (paid)/received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of tangible and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
Of which impact of capitalization of development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in loans and other non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Cash expenditures for acquisition of consolidated and non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of previously consolidated and non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance/(repayment) of short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Repayment/repurchase of long term debt |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Proceeds from disposal/(acquisition) of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(298 |
) |
Net cash (used) by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
4 510 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
3 781 |
* |
|
|
4,309 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $ 1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
|
* |
|
This amount includes 340 million of cash and cash equivalents held in countries subject to
exchange control restrictions at June 30, 2006 ( 517 million at June 30, 2005). Such
restrictions may limit the use of such cash and cash equivalents by group subsidiaries. |
F-5
UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Net |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
translation |
|
|
income |
|
|
holders of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
of shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
reserves |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
the parent |
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
(in millions of euros except for number of shares outstanding) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 after
appropriation |
|
|
1,365,973,827 |
|
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
8,226 |
|
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Financial assets available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) changes directly
recognized in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of accounted expenses and revenues |
|
|
1,107,661 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Deferred share-based payments |
|
|
900,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net change in treasury stock of shares
owned by consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
1,367,981,550 |
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
8,271 |
|
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(1,583 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
5,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Cash flow hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) changes directly
recognized in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of accounted expenses and revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital increases |
|
|
1,197,999 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Deferred share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Net change in treasury stock of shares
owned by consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
441,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 before appropriation |
|
|
1,369,620,931 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
(4,475 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
6,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed appropriation of net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 after
appropriation |
|
|
1,369,620,931 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
(3,545 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
6,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Cash flow hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) changes directly
recognized in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of accounted expenses and revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital increases |
|
|
2,235,473 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Deferred share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Net change in treasury stock of shares
owned by consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
673,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 before appropriation |
|
|
1,372,530,202 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
(3,541 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
6,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed appropriation of net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 after appropriation |
|
|
1,372,530,202 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
6,157 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair value changes relating to marketable securities at fair value through profit or loss
were recognized in the income statement in previous accounting periods and appear in retained
earnings as a positive amount of 20 million at June 30, 2006. Starting as of January 1,
2006, these changes will be directly recognized in shareholders equity following the revised
designation of these marketable securities as financial assets available for sale (see note
1u). |
F-6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Alcatel is a French public limited liability company that is subject to the French
Commercial Code and to all the legal requirements governing commercial companies in France. Alcatel
was incorporated on June 18, 1898 and will be dissolved on June 30, 2086, except if dissolved
earlier or except if its life is prolonged. Alcatels headquarters are situated at 54, rue la
Boétie, 75008 Paris, France. Alcatel is listed principally on the Paris and New York stock
exchanges.
The consolidated financial statements reflect the results and financial position of Alcatel
and its subsidiaries (the Group) as well as its investments in associates (equity affiliates)
and joint ventures. They are presented in Euros rounded to the nearest million.
The Group develops and integrates technologies, applications and services to offer innovative
global communications solutions.
On July 26, 2006, the Board of Directors of Alcatel authorized the publication of the
consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2006.
Note 1
Summary of accounting policies
Due to the listing of Alcatels securities on the Euronext Paris and in accordance with the
European Unions regulation No. 1606/2002 of July 19, 2002, the 2005 and first semester 2006
unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in
accordance with IFRSs (International Financial Reporting Standards) as adopted by the European
Union.
Between 1999 and 2004, the consolidated financial statements of the Group were prepared in
accordance with French generally accepted accounting principles (French GAAP) in compliance with
the Principles and accounting methodology relative to consolidated financial statements
regulation No. 99-02 of the Comité de la Réglementation Comptable approved by the decree dated
June 22, 1999.
As a first-time adopter of IFRSs at December 31, 2005, Alcatel has followed the IFRS 1
regulations governing the first-time adoption of IFRSs by companies. The options selected, where
applicable, are indicated in the following notes. Reconciliation schedules between the 2004
consolidated net income and consolidated shareholders equity at both January 1, 2004 and December
31, 2004 between IFRSs and those prepared previously in accordance with French GAAP have been
presented in the 2005 consolidated financial statements. International Accounting Standards (IAS)
32 and 39 dealing with financial instruments and IFRS 5 concerning non-current assets held for sale
and discontinued operations have been applied as from January 1, 2004.
The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting and in accordance with IFRSs adopted by the European
Union at June 30, 2006. The accounting policies and measurement principles adopted for the summary
consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2006 are the same as those used in the consolidated
financial statements at December 31, 2005.
(a) Basis of preparation
The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the
historical cost convention, with the exception of certain categories of assets and liabilities, in
accordance with IFRSs. The categories concerned are detailed in the following notes.
(b) Consolidation methods
Companies over which the Group has control are fully consolidated.
Companies over which the Group has joint control are accounted for using proportionate
consolidation.
Companies over which the Group has a significant influence (investments in associates ) are
accounted for under the equity method. Significant influence is assumed when the Groups interest
in the voting rights is greater than or equal to 20%.
All significant intra-group transactions are eliminated.
F-7
(c) Business combinations
Regulations governing first-time adoption: Business combinations that were completed
before January 1, 2004, the transition date to IFRSs, have not been restated, as permitted by the
optional exemption included in IFRS 1. Goodwill has therefore not been accounted for business
combinations occurring prior to January 1, 2004, which were previously accounted for in accordance
with article 215 of Regulation N° 99-02 of the Comité de la Réglementation Comptable. According
to this regulation, the assets and liabilities of the acquired company are maintained at their
carrying value at the date of the acquisition, adjusted for the Groups accounting policies, and
the difference between this value and the acquisition cost of the shares is adjusted directly
against shareholders equity.
Business combinations after January 1, 2004: These business combinations are accounted
for in accordance with the purchase method. Once control is obtained over a company, its assets,
liabilities and contingent liabilities are measured at their fair value at the acquisition date in
accordance with IFRS requirements. Any difference between the fair value and the carrying value is
accounted for in the respective underlying asset or liability, including both the Group interest
and minority interests. Any excess between the purchase price and the Groups share in the fair
value of such net assets is recognized as goodwill (see intangible and tangible assets).
The accounting treatment of stock options of companies acquired in the context of a business
combination is described in note 1w below.
(d) Translation of financial statements denominated in foreign currencies
The balance sheets of consolidated subsidiaries having a functional currency different from
the euro are translated into euros at the closing exchange rate (spot exchange rate at the balance
sheet date), and their income statements and cash flow statements are translated at the average
exchange rate. The resulting translation adjustments are included in shareholders equity under the
caption Cumulative translation adjustments.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising from the acquisition of a foreign entity are
considered as assets and liabilities of that entity. They are therefore listed in the entitys
functional currency and translated using the closing exchange rate.
Regulations governing first-time adoption: In accordance with the option available
under IFRS 1, the accumulated total of translation adjustments at the transition date has been
deemed to be zero. This amount has been reversed against consolidated reserves, leaving the amount
of shareholders equity unchanged. Translation adjustments that predate the IFRS transition will
therefore not be included when calculating gains or losses arising from the future disposal of
consolidated subsidiaries or equity affiliates.
(e) Translation of foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated at the rate of exchange applicable on the
transaction date. At period-end, foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at
the rate of exchange prevailing on that date. The resulting exchange gains or losses are recorded
in the income statement in other financial income (loss).
Exchange gains or losses on foreign currency financial instruments that represent an economic
hedge of a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are reported as translation adjustments in
shareholders equity under the caption Cumulative translation adjustments until the disposal of
the investment. Refer to Note 1d above for information on the recognition of translation
adjustments at the transition date.
In order for a currency derivative to be eligible for hedge accounting treatment (cash flow
hedge or fair value hedge), its hedging role must be defined and documented and it must be seen to
be effective for the entirety of its period of use. Fair value hedges allow companies to protect
themselves against exposure to changes in fair value of their assets, liabilities or firm
commitments. Cash flow hedges allow companies to protect themselves against exposure to changes in
future cash flows (for example, revenues generated by the companys assets).
The value used for derivatives is their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives
are accounted for as follows:
|
|
|
For derivatives treated as cash flow hedges, changes in their fair value are accounted
for in shareholders equity and then reclassified to income (cost of sales) when the hedged
revenue is accounted for. The ineffective portion is recorded in other financial income
(loss). |
|
|
|
|
For derivatives treated as fair value hedges, changes in their fair value are recorded
in the income statement where they offset the changes in fair value of the hedged assets,
liabilities and firm commitments. |
In addition to derivatives used to hedge firm commitments documented as fair value hedges,
from April 1, 2005 onwards, the Group has designated and documented highly probable future streams
of revenue with respect to which the
F-8
Group has entered into hedge transactions. The corresponding
derivatives are accounted for in accordance with the requirements governing cash flow hedge
accounting.
Derivatives related to commercial bids are not considered eligible for hedge accounting
treatment and are accounted for as trading financial instruments. Changes in fair values of such
instruments are included in the income statement in cost of sales (in the business segment
other).
Once a commercial contract is effective, the corresponding firm commitment is hedged with a
derivative treated as a fair value hedge. Revenues made pursuant to such a contract are then
accounted for, throughout the duration of the contract, using the spot rate prevailing on the date
on which the contract was effective, insofar as the exchange rate hedging is effective.
(f) Research and development expenses
In accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets, research and development expenses are recorded
as expenses in the year in which they are incurred, except for:
|
|
|
development costs, which are capitalized as an intangible asset when they
strictly comply with the following criteria: |
|
. |
|
the project is clearly defined, and the costs are separately identified and
reliably measured; |
|
|
. |
|
the technical feasibility of the project is demonstrated; |
|
|
. |
|
the intention exists to finish the project and use or sell the products created
during the project; |
|
|
. |
|
a potential market for the products created during the project exists or their
usefulness, in case of internal use, is demonstrated; and |
|
|
. |
|
adequate resources are available to complete the project. |
|
|
|
These development costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the projects
concerned. |
|
|
|
|
Specifically for software, useful life is determined as follows: |
|
. |
|
in case of internal use : over its probable service lifetime, |
|
|
. |
|
in case of external use : according to prospects for sale, rental or other
forms of distribution. |
|
|
|
The amortization of capitalized development costs begins as soon as the product in question
is released.
Capitalized software development costs are those incurred during the programming,
codification and testing phases. Costs incurred during the design and planning, product
definition and product specification stages are accounted for as expenses. |
|
|
|
customer design engineering costs (recoverable amounts disbursed under the
terms of contracts with customers), are included in work in progress on construction
contracts. |
With regard to business combinations, Alcatel allocates a portion of the purchase price to
in-process research and development projects that may be significant. As part of the process of
analyzing these business combinations, Alcatel may make the decision to buy technology that has not
yet been commercialized rather than develop the technology internally. Decisions of this nature
consider existing opportunities for Alcatel to stay at the forefront of rapid technological
advances in the telecommunications-data networking industry.
The fair value of in-process research and development acquired in business combinations is
based on present value calculations of income, an analysis of the projects accomplishments and an
evaluation of the overall contribution of the project, and the projects risks.
The revenue projection used to value in-process research and development is based on estimates
of relevant market sizes and growth factors, expected trends in technology, and the nature and
expected timing of new product introductions by Alcatel and its competitors. Future net cash flows
from such projects are based on managements estimates of such projects cost of sales, operating
expenses and income taxes.
The value assigned to purchased in-process research and development is also adjusted to
reflect the stage of completion, the complexity of the work completed to date, the difficulty of
completing the remaining development, costs already incurred, and the projected cost to complete
the projects.
Such value is determined by discounting the net cash flows to their present value. The
selection of the discount rate is based on Alcatels weighted average cost of capital, adjusted
upward to reflect additional risks inherent in the development life cycle.
Capitalized development costs considered as assets (either generated internally and
capitalized or reflected in the purchase price of a business combination) are generally amortized
over 3 to 7 years.
F-9
Impairment tests are carried out, using the methods described in the following paragraph.
(g) Goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
In accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and with IAS 38 Intangible Assets,
only items whose cost can be reliably measured and for which future economic benefits are likely to
flow to the Group are recognized as assets.
In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, whenever events or changes in market
conditions indicate a risk of impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, a
detailed review is carried out in order to determine whether the net carrying amount of such assets
remains lower than their recoverable amount, which is defined as the greater of fair value (less
costs to sell) and value in use. Value in use is measured by discounting the expected future cash
flows from continuing use of the asset and its ultimate disposal.
In the event that the recoverable value is lower than the net carrying value, the difference
between the two amounts is recorded as an impairment loss. Impairment losses for property, plant
and equipment or intangible assets with finite useful lives can be reversed if the recoverable
value becomes higher than the net carrying value (but not exceeding the loss initially recorded).
Goodwill
Since transition to IFRSs, goodwill is no longer amortized in accordance with IFRS 3 Business
Combinations. Before January 1, 2004, goodwill was amortized using the straight-line method over a
period, determined on a case-by-case basis, not exceeding 20 years.
Each goodwill item is tested for impairment at least annually during the second quarter of the
year. The impairment test methodology is based on a comparison between the recoverable amounts of
each of the Groups business divisions with the business divisions net asset carrying value
(including goodwill). Such recoverable amounts are mainly determined using discounted cash flows
over five years and a discounted residual value. The discount rate used was the Groups weighted
average cost of capital of 10.8% for 2004 and 9.5% for 2005 and for the first six months of 2006.
These discount rates are after-tax rates applied to after-tax cash flows. The use of such rates
results in recoverable values that are identical to those that would be obtained by using, as
required by IAS 36, before-tax rates applied to before-tax cash flows. A single discount rate has
been used on the basis that risks specific to certain products or markets have been reflected in
determining the cash flows. Management believes the assumptions used concerning sales growth and
residual values are reasonable and in line with market data available for each business division.
Further impairment tests are carried out if events occur indicating a potential impairment.
Goodwill impairment losses cannot be reversed.
Equity affiliate goodwill is included with the related investment in share in net assets of
equity affiliates. The requirements of IAS 39 are applied to determine whether any impairment loss
must be recognized with respect to the net investment in equity affiliates. The impairment loss is
calculated according to IAS 36 requirements.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets mainly include capitalized development costs and those assets acquired in
business combinations, primarily software-related costs. Intangible assets are generally amortized
on a straight-line basis over a 3 to 7 year period. However, software amortization methods can be
adjusted to take into account how the product is marketed. Amortization and impairment losses are
accounted for in the income statement under cost of sales, research and development expenses or
administrative and selling expenses, depending on the designation of the asset. No intangible
assets are considered to have indefinite useful lives. All intangible assets, with the exception of
goodwill, are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are valued at historical cost for the Group less accumulated
depreciation expenses and any impairment losses. Depreciation expense is generally calculated over
the following useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial buildings, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
. buildings for industrial use |
|
20 years |
. infrastructure and fixtures |
|
10-20 years |
. equipment and tools |
|
5-10 years |
. small equipment and tools |
|
3 years |
Buildings for administrative and commercial use |
|
20-40 years |
Depreciation expense is determined using the straight-line method.
Fixed assets acquired through finance lease arrangements or long-term rental arrangements that
transfer substantially all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of the asset to the
Group (tenant) are capitalized.
F-10
Residual value, if considered to be significant, is included when calculating the depreciable
amount. Property, plant and equipment are segregated into their separate components if there is a
significant difference in their expected useful lives, and depreciated accordingly.
Depreciation and impairment losses are accounted for in the income statement under cost of
sales, research and development costs or administrative and selling expenses, depending on the
nature of the asset.
(h) Non-consolidated investments and other non-current financial assets
In accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments : Recognition and Measurement, investments
in non-consolidated companies are classified as available-for-sale and therefore measured at their
fair value. The fair value for listed securities is their market price. If a reliable fair value
cannot be established, securities are valued at cost. Fair value changes are accounted for directly
in shareholders equity. When objective evidence of impairment of a financial asset exists (for
instance, a significant or prolonged decline in the value of an asset), an irreversible impairment
loss is recorded. This loss can only be released upon the sale of the securities concerned.
Loans are measured at amortized cost. Loans may suffer impairment losses if there is objective
evidence of a loss in value. The impairment represented by the difference between net carrying
amount and recoverable value is recognized in the income statement and can be reversed if
recoverable value rises in the future.
The portfolio of non-consolidated securities and other financial assets is examined at each
quarter-end to detect any objective evidence of impairment. When this is the case, an impairment
loss is recorded. Impairment losses on securities accounted for at quarter-ends are considered
definitive and are not reversed before disposal of the securities.
(i) Inventories and work in progress
Inventories and work in progress are valued at the lower of cost (including indirect
production costs where applicable) or net realizable value. Cost is primarily calculated on a
weighted average price basis.
Net realizable value is the estimated sales revenue for a normal period of activity less
expected selling costs.
(j) Treasury stock
Treasury shares owned by Alcatel or its subsidiaries are valued at their cost price and are
deducted from shareholders equity. Proceeds from the sale of such shares are included directly in
shareholders equity and have no impact on the income statement.
(k) Pension and retirement obligations and other employee and post-employment benefit obligations
Post-employment benefits:
In accordance with the laws and practices of each country, the Group participates in employee
benefit plans.
For defined contribution plans, the Group expenses contributions as and when they are due. As
the Group is not liable for any legal or constructive obligations under the plans beyond the
contributions paid, no provision is made. Provisions for defined benefit plans and other long-term
employee benefits are determined as follows:
|
|
|
using the Projected Unit Credit Method (with projected final salary), each period of
service gives rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement and each unit is measured
separately to calculate the final obligation. Actuarial assumptions such as mortality
rates, rates of employee turnover and projection of future salary levels are used to
calculate the obligation; |
|
|
|
|
using the corridor method, only actuarial gains and losses in excess of either 10% of
the present value of the defined benefit obligation or 10% of the fair value of any plan
assets, whichever is greater, are recognized over the expected average remaining working
lives of the employees participating in the plan. |
The expense resulting from the change in net pension and other post-retirement obligations is
recorded in income (loss) from operating activities or in other financial income (loss) depending
upon the nature of the underlying obligation.
The Group has decided not to adopt the new option provided for in IAS 19 Employee Benefits
Actuarial Gains and Losses, Group Plans and Disclosures that allows the full amount of actuarial
gains and losses to be recorded directly in shareholders equity.
Regulations governing first-time adoption: In accordance with the option available
under IFRS 1, the accumulated unrecognized actuarial gains and losses at the transition date have
been recorded in shareholders equity. The corridor method has been applied starting January 1,
2004.
F-11
Certain other post-employment benefits such as life insurance and health insurance
(particularly in the United States) or long-service medals (bonuses awarded to employees for long
service particularly in French and German companies), are also recognized as provisions, which are
determined by means of an actuarial calculation similar to the one used for retirement provisions.
The accounting treatment used for employee stock options is detailed in note 1w below.
(l) Provisions for restructuring and restructuring costs
Provisions for restructuring costs are made when restructuring programs have been finalized
and approved by Group management and have been announced before the balance sheet date of the
Groups financial statements, resulting in an obligating event of the Group to third parties. Such
costs primarily relate to severance payments, early retirement, costs for notice periods not
worked, training costs of terminated employees, and other costs linked to the closure of
facilities. Other costs (removal costs, training costs of transferred employees, etc) and
write-offs of fixed assets, inventories and work in progress and other assets, directly linked to
restructuring measures, are also accounted for in restructuring costs.
The amounts reserved for anticipated severance payments made in the context of restructuring
programs are valued at their present value in cases where the settlement date is beyond the normal
operating cycle of the company and the time value of money is deemed to be significant. The impact
of the passage of time on the present value of the payments is included in other financial income
(loss).
(m) Financial debt compound financial instruments
Some financial instruments contain both a liability and an equity component. This is the case
with the bonds issued by the Group in 2003 (Oceane Obligation Convertible ou Echangeable en
Actions Nouvelles ou Existantes, bonds that can be converted into or exchanged for new or existing
shares) and in 2002 (Orane Obligation Remboursable en Actions Nouvelles ou Existantes, notes
mandatorily redeemable for new or existing shares). The different components of these instruments
are accounted for in shareholders equity and in bonds and notes issued according to their
classification, as defined in IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation.
The component classified as a financial liability is valued on the issuance date at present
value (taking into account the credit risk at issuance date) of the future cash flows (including
interest and repayment of the nominal value) of a bond with the same characteristics (maturity,
cash flows) but without any equity component. The portion included in shareholders equity results
from the difference between the debt issue amount and the financial liability component.
(n) Deferred taxation
Deferred taxes are computed in accordance with the liability method for all temporary
differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts,
including the reversal of entries recorded in individual accounts of subsidiaries solely for tax
purposes. All amounts resulting from changes in tax rates are recorded in shareholders equity or
in net income (loss) for the year in which the tax rate change is enacted.
Deferred tax assets are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet when it is more likely than
not that the tax benefit will be realized in the future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
not discounted.
To assess the ability of the Group to recover deferred tax assets, the following factors are taken into account:
|
|
|
existence of deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
forecasts of future tax results, |
|
|
|
|
the impact of non-recurring costs included in income or loss in recent years that are
not expected to be repeated in the future, |
|
|
|
|
historical data concerning recent years tax results, and |
|
|
|
|
if required, tax planning strategy, such as the planned disposal of undervalued assets. |
(o) Revenues
Revenues include net sales and service revenues from the Groups principal business
activities, net of value added taxes (VAT), income due from licensing fees and from income grants,
net of VAT.
Revenue is recognized when the company has transferred the significant risks and rewards of
ownership of a product to the buyer.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or to be received. Where a
deferred payment has a significant impact on the calculation of fair value, it is accounted for by
discounting future payments. Product rebates or quantity discounts are deducted from revenues with
the exception of promotional activities giving rise to free products,
F-12
which are accounted for in
cost of sales and provided for in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets, or IAS 11 Construction Contracts.
In general, the Group recognizes revenue from the sale of goods and equipment when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement with its customer exists, delivery has occurred, the amount of revenue
can be measured reliably and it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the
transaction will flow to the Group. For arrangements where the customer specifies formal acceptance
of the goods, equipment, services or software, revenue is generally deferred until all the
acceptance criteria have been met.
Under IAS 11, construction contracts are defined as contracts specifically negotiated for the
construction of an asset or a combination of assets that are closely interrelated or interdependent
in terms of their design, technology and function or their ultimate purpose of use (primarily those
related to customized network solutions and network build-outs with a duration of more than two
quarters). For revenues generated from construction contracts, the Group applies the percentage of
completion method of accounting in application of the above principles, provided certain specified
conditions are met, based either on the achievement of contractually defined milestones or on costs
incurred compared with total estimated costs. Any probable construction contract losses are
recognized immediately in cost of sales. If uncertainty exists regarding customer acceptance, or
the contracts duration is relatively short, revenues are recognized only to the extent of costs
incurred that are recoverable, or on completion of the contract. Work in progress on construction
contracts is stated at production cost, excluding administrative and selling expenses. Under IAS
11, changes in provisions for penalties for delayed delivery or poor contract execution are
reported in revenues and not in cost of sales.
Advance payments received on construction contracts, before corresponding work has been
carried out, are recorded in customers deposits and advances. Costs incurred to date plus
recognized profits less the sum of recognized losses (in the case of provisions for contract
losses) and progress billings, are determined on a contract-by-contract basis. If the amount is
positive, it is included as an asset under amount due from customers on construction contracts.
If the amount is negative, it is included as a liability under amount due to customers on
construction contracts.
For revenues generated from licensing, selling or otherwise marketing software solutions, the
Group recognizes revenue generally upon delivery of the software and on the related services as and
when they are performed, in application of the principles described above. For arrangements to sell
software licenses with services, software license revenue is recognized separately from the related
service revenue, providing the transaction adheres to certain criteria (as prescribed by the
AICPAs SOP 97-2), such as the existence of sufficient vendor-specific objective evidence of fair
value to permit allocation of the revenue to the various elements of the arrangement. If the
arrangement does not meet the specified criteria, revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over
the service period. For arrangements to sell services only, revenue from training or consulting
services is recognized when the services are performed. Maintenance service revenue, including
post-contract customer support, is deferred and recognized ratably over the contracted service
period.
For product sales made through retailers and distributors, revenue is recognized upon shipment
to the distribution channel, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Such
sales are not contingent on the distributor selling the product to third parties, as the
distribution contracts contain no right of return.
The Group accrues warranty costs, sales returns and other allowances based on contract terms
and its historical experience.
(p) Income (loss) from operating activities
We have considered it relevant to the understanding of the companys financial performance to
present on the face of the income statement a subtotal inside the income (loss) from operating
activities.
This subtotal, named Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring,
share-based payment, impairment of capitalized development costs and gain (loss) on disposal of
consolidated entities, excludes those elements that have little predictive value due to their
nature, frequency and/or materiality.
Those elements can be divided in two categories :
|
|
|
Elements that are both very infrequent and material, such as a major impairment of an
asset (as the impairment of capitalized development costs accounted for in 2004 following
our decision to stop a specific product line), a disposal of investments (as the capital
gain related to the Space business accounted for in 2005) or the settlement of a
litigation. |
|
|
|
|
Elements that are by nature unpredictable in their amount and /or in their frequency,
if they are material. We consider that materiality must be assessed not only by comparing
the amount concerned with the income (loss) from operating activities of the period, but
also in terms of changes in the item from one period to the other. It is for instance the
case for our restructuring charges due to the dramatic changes from one period to the
other. It is also the case for share-based
payments, as their value is determined based, in
part, upon the volatility and the price of the companys shares and as, for example, in any
given year we may make substantially increased share-based |
F-13
|
|
|
payments in the context of the
acquisition of a business, due to the fact that it is Alcatels practice to convert
outstanding options of the acquired business into options for Alcatel shares. |
Share-based payments were also isolated in 2005 and 2004 due to the fact that this type of
expense was not yet recognized in other generally accepted accounting standards used by some of our
main competitors. In view of the relative lack of materiality of these payments and the evolution
of the other accounting standards towards the same principle as is applied under IFRS, we will not
continue this presentation in the future, starting with the year 2006: share-based payments will no
longer be isolated, but will be allocated by function.
Income (loss) from operating activities includes gross margin, administrative and selling
expenses and research and development costs (see note 1f) and, in particular, pension costs (except
for the financial component, see note 1k), employee profit sharing, fair value changes of
derivative instruments related to commercial bids and capital gains (losses) from the disposal of
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, and all other operating expenses or income
regardless of their predictive value in terms of nature, frequency and/or materiality.
Income (loss) from operating activities is calculated before financial income (loss), which
includes the financial component of retirement expenses, financing costs and capital gains (losses)
from disposal of financial assets (shares in a non-consolidated company or company consolidated
under the equity method and other non-current financial assets, net), and before income tax, share
in net income (losses) of equity affiliates and income (loss) from discontinued operations.
(q) Finance costs
This item includes interest charges and interest income relating to net consolidated debt,
which consists of bonds, the liability component of compound financial instruments such as OCEANE,
other long-term debt (including lease-financing liabilities), and all cash assimilated items (cash,
cash equivalents and marketable securities).
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production
of an asset are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
(r) Structure of consolidated balance sheet
Most of the Groups activities in the various business segments have long-term operating
cycles. As a result, the consolidated balance sheet combines current assets (inventories and work
in progress and trade receivables and related accounts) and current liabilities (provisions,
customers deposits and advances, trade payables and related accounts) without distinction between
the amounts due within one year and those due after one year.
(s) Financial instruments and derecognition of financial assets
Financial instruments
The Group uses financial instruments to manage and reduce its exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
The accounting policies applied to currency hedge-related instruments are detailed in note 1e.
Financial instruments for interest rate hedges are subject to fair value hedge accounting.
Financial liabilities hedged using interest rate swaps are measured at the fair value of the
obligation linked to interest rate movements. Fair value changes are recorded in the income
statement for the year and are offset by equivalent changes in the interest rate swaps for the
effective part of the hedge.
Derecognition of financial assets:
A financial asset as defined under IAS 32 Financial Instruments : Disclosure and
Presentation is either totally or partially derecognized (removed from the balance sheet) when
the Group expects no further cash flow to be generated by it and retains no control of the asset or
transfers substantially all risks and rewards attached to it.
In the case of trade receivables, a transfer without recourse in case of payment default by
the debtor is regarded as a transfer of substantially all risks and rewards of ownership, thus
making such receivables eligible for derecognition, on the basis that risk of late payment is
considered marginal.
The amount of receivables sold without recourse is given in note 12.
F-14
(t) Cash and cash equivalents
In accordance with IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements, cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated
statements of cash flows includes cash (cash funds and term deposits) and cash equivalents
(short-term investments that are very liquid and readily convertible to known amounts of cash and
are only subject to negligible changes of value). Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of
cash flows does not include investments in listed securities, investments with an initial maturity
date exceeding three months and without an early exit clause, or bank accounts restricted in use,
other than restrictions due to regulations applied in a specific country or sector of activities
(exchange controls, etc.).
Bank overdrafts are considered as financing and are also excluded from cash and cash
equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet correspond to the cash and cash equivalents
defined above.
(u) Marketable securities
Marketable securities are quoted market funds with original maturities exceeding three months
and/or with underlying assets such as listed shares. In accordance with IAS 39 Financial
Instruments : Recognition and Measurement, marketable securities are valued at their fair value.
No securities are classified as held-to-maturity. For securities designated as at fair value
through profit or loss, changes in fair value are recorded in the income statement (in other
financial income (loss)). For available-for-sale securities, changes in fair value are recorded in
shareholders equity, or in the income statement (other financial income (loss)), if there is
objective evidence of a more than temporary decline in the fair value, or in connection with a
disposal of such securities.
Further to the publication of the Fair Value Option amendment to IAS 39 Financial
Instruments : Recognition and Measurement, effective from January 1, 2006, certain marketable
securities previously included in the category of financial assets at fair value through profit or
loss are now designated as financial assets available for sale. The impact of this change, had it
been applied in 2005, is presented in note 7 Financial income (loss), and in the consolidated
statement of changes in shareholders equity of this document.
(v) Customer financing
The Group undertakes two types of customer financing:
|
|
|
financing relating to the operating cycle and directly linked to actual contracts ; |
|
|
|
|
longer-term financing (beyond the operating cycle) through customer loans, minority
investments or other forms of financing. |
The first category of financing is accounted for in current assets. Changes in net loans
receivable are presented in net change in current assets of the consolidated statement of cash
flows.
The second category of financing is accounted for in other non-current financial assets, net.
Changes in net loans receivable are included in cash flows from investing activities
(decrease/increase in loans and other non-current financial assets) in the consolidated statement
of cash flows.
Furthermore, the Group may give guarantees to banks in connection with customer financing.
These are included in off balance sheet commitments.
(w) Stock options
In accordance with the requirements of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, stock options granted to
employees are included in the financial statements using the following principles: the stock
options fair value, which is considered to be a reflection of the fair value of the services
provided by the employee in exchange for the option, is determined on the grant date. It is
accounted for in additional paid-in capital (credit) at grant date, with a counterpart in deferred
compensation (debit) (also included in additional paid-in capital). During the vesting period,
deferred compensation is amortized in the income statement (in the caption share-based payments).
Stock option fair value is calculated using the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein binomial model. This model
permits to take into consideration the options characteristics, such as exercise price and expiry
date, market data at the time of acquisition such as the interest rate on risk-free securities,
share price, volatility and expected dividends, and behavioral factors of the beneficiary, such as
expected early exercise.
Only options issued after November 7, 2002 and not fully vested at January 1, 2005 are
accounted for according to IFRS 2.
F-15
The impact of applying IFRS 2 on net income (loss) is accounted for in share-based payments
(stock option plans) in the income statement.
Outstanding stock options at the acquisition date of a company acquired in a business
combination are usually converted into options to purchase Alcatel shares using the same exchange
ratio as for the acquired shares of the target company. In accordance with IFRS 3 Business
Combinations and IFRS 2 Share-based Payment requirements, the fair value of stock options
acquired at the time of acquisition is accounted for in the caption additional paid-in capital.
Unvested options at the acquisition date are accounted for at their fair value as deferred
compensation in shareholders equity (included in additional paid-in capital). The counter value of
these two amounts, equivalent to the fair value of vested options, is taken into account in the
acquisition price allocation.
Only acquisitions made after January 1, 2004 and for which unvested stock options as of
December 31, 2004 existed at the acquisition date are accounted for as described above.
(x) Assets held for sale and discontinued operations
A non-current asset or disposal group (group of assets or a cash generating unit) is
considered as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction
rather than through continuing use. For this to be the case, the asset must be available for sale
and its sale must be highly probable. These assets or disposal groups classified as held for sale
are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
A discontinued operation is a separate major line of business or geographical area of
operations for the Group that is either being sold or is being held for sale. The net income
(loss), balance sheet and statement of cash flow elements relating to such discontinued operations
are presented in specific captions in the consolidated financial statements for all periods
presented.
(y) Accounting standards and interpretations that have been published but are not yet effective
As of June 30, 2006, there were no IFRS accounting standards and interpretations that had been
published but were not yet effective which were applied by Alcatel earlier than the effective date.
Other IFRS accounting standards and interpretations that have been published by the approval date
of these financial statements but are not yet effective and for which the Group has not elected
early application and that are likely to affect the Group are as follows :
|
|
|
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments Disclosures, effective for annual periods beginning on
or after January 1, 2007 ; |
|
|
|
|
IAS 1 Amendment relating to capital disclosures, effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2007 and |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 8 Scope of IFRS 2, effective for annual periods beginning on or after May 1,
2006. |
The Group is currently assessing the potential impact that application of these standards and
interpretations will have on consolidated net income (loss), financial position, changes in cash
and cash equivalents and notes to the consolidated financial statements. At this stage, we do not
anticipate any significant impact for the Group.
(z) Unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements
Seasonal nature of activity
Interim revenues and income (loss) from operating activities are highly seasonal due to a high
level of activity during the last quarter of the year, particularly in December. The impact of this
seasonality varies from year to year. Pursuant to the IFRS accounting principles, interim net sales
are accounted for under the same principles as year-end net sales; that is, in the period in which
they are achieved.
Income tax
For interim financial statements, the income tax charge (current and deferred) is calculated
by applying the estimated effective annual tax rate for the year under review to net income for the
period for each entity or tax grouping. Deferred income tax assets are recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet when it is more likely than not that those assets will be realized in the future.
Note 2
Principal uncertainties regarding the use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRSs implies that the
Group makes a certain number of estimates and assumptions that are considered realistic and
reasonable. However, subsequent facts and circumstances could lead to changes in these estimates or
assumptions, which would affect the value of the Groups assets, liabilities, shareholders equity
and net income (loss).
F-16
(a) Valuation allowance for inventories and work in progress
Inventories and work in progress are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Valuation allowances for inventories and work in progress are calculated based on an analysis of
foreseeable changes in demand, technology or the market, in order to determine obsolete or excess
inventories and work in progress.
The valuation allowances are accounted for in cost of sales or in restructuring costs
depending on the nature of the amounts concerned.
Significant provisions for write-down of inventories and work in progress were accounted for
in the past because of difficult market conditions and the abandonment of certain product lines.
The impact of these provisions on our income before tax is a net
charge of
28 million for the
first six months of 2006 (a net charge of 18 million in 2005 and of 15 million for the first
six months of 2005).
Because of the revival in the telecommunications market, our future results could continue to
be positively impacted by the reversal of provisions previously made, as they were, for example, in
2004 (net gain of 20 million).
(b) Impairment of customer receivables and loans
An impairment loss is recorded for customer receivables and loans if the present value of the
future receipts is below the nominal value. The amount of the impairment loss reflects both the
customers ability to honor their debts and the age of the debts in question. A higher default rate
than estimated or the deterioration of our major customers creditworthiness could have an adverse
impact on our future results. Impairment losses on customer receivables were 221 million at June
30, 2006 ( 228 million at December 31, 2005 and 260 million at June 30, 2005). The impact of
impairment losses for customer receivables and loans on income before tax is a net gain of 5
million for the first six months of 2006 (a net gain of 25 million in 2005 and 28 million for
the first six months of 2005).
Impairment losses on customer loans and other financial assets (assets essentially relating to
customer financing arrangements) were 887 million at June 30, 2006 ( 897 million at December 31,
2005 and 918 million at June 30, 2005). The impact of these impairment losses on income before
tax is a net gain of 2 million for the first semester 2006 (a net gain of 25 million in 2005
and 4 million for the first six months of 2005).
(c) Capitalized development costs, goodwill and other intangible assets
The criteria for capitalizing development costs are set out in note 1f. Once capitalized,
these costs are amortized over the estimated lives of the products concerned.
The Group must therefore evaluate the commercial and technical feasibility of these projects
and estimate the useful lives of the products resulting from the projects. Should a product fail to
substantiate these assumptions, the Group may be required to impair or write off some of the
capitalized development costs in the future.
The Group also has intangible assets acquired for cash or through business combinations and
the goodwill resulting from such combinations.
As indicated in note 1g, in addition to the annual goodwill impairment tests, timely
impairment tests are carried out in the event of indications of reduction in value of intangible
assets held. Possible impairments are based on discounted future cash flows and/or fair values of
the assets concerned. A change in the market conditions or the cash flows initially estimated can
therefore lead to a review and a change in the impairment loss previously recorded.
Net goodwill is 3,735 million at June 30, 2006 ( 3,772 million at December 31, 2005 and
3,896 million at June 30, 2005). Other intangible assets, net were 875 million at June 30, 2006
( 819 million at December 31, 2005 and 808 million at June 30, 2005). The annual impairment test
for goodwill (note 1g) was performed during the second quarter of 2006 and resulted in no goodwill
impairment being recorded as of June 30, 2006.
(d) Impairment of property, plant and equipment
In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, when events or changes in market conditions
indicate that tangible or intangible assets may be impaired, such assets are reviewed in detail to
determine whether their carrying value is lower than their recoverable value, which could lead to
recording an impairment loss (recoverable value is the higher of its value in use and its fair
value less costs to sell) (see note 1g). Value in use is estimated by calculating the present value
of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset. Fair value less costs to sell is
based on the most reliable information available (market statistics, recent transactions, etc.).
F-17
The planned closing of certain facilities, additional reductions in personnel and reductions
in market outlooks have been considered impairment triggering events in prior years. No significant
impairment losses have been recorded either for the first semester 2006 or for 2005.
When determining recoverable value of property, plant and equipment, assumptions and estimates
are made, based primarily on market outlooks, obsolescence and sale or liquidation disposal values.
Any change in these assumptions can have a significant effect on the recoverable amount and could
lead to a revision of recorded impairment losses.
(e) Provision for warranty costs and other product sales reserves
Provisions are recorded for warranties given to customers on our products or for expected
losses and for penalties incurred in the event of failure to meet contractual obligations on
construction contracts. These provisions are calculated based on historical return rates and
warranty costs expensed as well as on estimates. These provisions and subsequent changes to the
provisions are recorded in cost of sales either when revenue is recognized (provision for customer
warranties) or, for construction contracts, when revenue and expenses are recognized by reference
to the stage of completion of the contract activity. Costs and penalties that will be effectively
paid can differ considerably from the amounts initially reserved and could therefore have a
significant impact on future results.
Product sales reserves represent 653 million at June 30, 2006, of which 151 million relate
to construction contracts (see note 12)
( 753 million and 173 million respectively at December
31, 2005). For further information on the impact on net income (loss) of the change in these
provisions, see notes 12 and 15.
(f) Deferred taxes
Deferred tax assets relate primarily to tax loss carry forwards and to deductible temporary
differences between reported amounts and the taxes bases of assets and liabilities. The assets
relating to the tax loss carry forwards are recognized if it is probable that the Group will
dispose of future taxable profits against which these tax losses can be set off.
At June 30, 2006, deferred tax assets were 1,670 million (of which 795 million relate to
the United States and 401 million to France). Evaluation of the Groups capacity to utilize tax
loss carry forwards relies on significant judgment. The Group analyzes the positive and negative
elements to conclude as to the probability of utilization in the future of these tax loss carry
forwards, which also consider the factors indicated in note 1n. This analysis is carried out
regularly in each tax jurisdiction where significant deferred tax assets are recorded.
If future taxable results are considerably different from those forecast that support
recording deferred tax assets, the Group will be obliged to revise downwards or upwards the amount
of the deferred tax assets, which would have a significant impact on our balance sheet and net
income (loss).
(g) Pension and retirement obligations and other employee and post-employment benefit obligations
As indicated in note 1k, the Group participates in defined contribution and defined benefit
plans for employees. Furthermore, certain other post-employment benefits, such as life insurance
and health insurance (mainly in the United States), are also reserved. All these obligations are
measured based on actuarial calculations relying upon assumptions, such as the discount rate,
return on plan assets, future salary increases, employee turnover and mortality tables.
These assumptions are generally updated annually. At December 31, 2005, the weighted average
discount rate was 3.95%, the weighted average future salary increase was 3.34% and the weighted
average expected long-term return on assets was 4.28% (these assumptions are set forth in note 25
of the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2005). Using the corridor method, only
actuarial gains and losses in excess of the greater of 10% of the present value of the defined
benefit obligation or 10% of the fair value of any plan assets are recognized over the expected
average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan. In accordance with the
option available under IFRS 1, cumulative actuarial gains and losses at the transition date have
been recognized in shareholders equity. The corridor method is therefore only applied as from
January 1, 2004.
The Group considers that the actuarial assumptions used are appropriate and supportable but
changes that will be made to them in the future could however have a significant impact on the
amount of such obligations and the Groups net income (loss). An increase of 0.5% in the discount
rate at December 31, 2005 (or a reduction of 0.5%) has a positive impact on 2005 net income of 8
million (or a negative impact of
8 million on net income). An increase of 0.5% in the assumed
rate of return on plan assets for 2005 (or a reduction of 0.5%) has a positive impact on 2005 net
income of 11 million (or a negative impact of 11 million on net income).
(h) Revenue recognition
As indicated in note 1o, revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received
or to be received when the company has transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership
of a product to the buyer.
F-18
For revenues and expenses generated from construction contracts, the Group applies the
percentage of completion method of accounting, provided certain specified conditions are met, based
either on the achievement of contractually defined milestones or on costs incurred compared with
total estimated costs. The determination of the stage of completion and the revenues to be
recognized rely on numerous estimations based on costs incurred and acquired experience.
Adjustments of initial estimates can however occur throughout the life of the contract, which can
have significant impacts on future net income (loss).
For arrangements to sell software licenses with services, software license revenue is
recognized separately from the related service revenue, providing the transaction adheres to
certain criteria (as prescribed by the AICPAs SOP 97-2), such as the existence of sufficient
vendor-specific objective evidence to determine the fair value of the various elements of the
arrangement. Determination of the fair value of the various elements of the arrangement relies also
on estimates, which if they would have to be corrected, would have an impact on revenues and net
income (loss).
In the context of the present telecommunications market, it can be difficult to evaluate the
Groups capacity to recover receivables. Such evaluation is based on the customers
creditworthiness and on the Groups capacity to sell such receivables without recourse. If,
subsequent to revenue recognition, the recoverability of a receivable that had been initially
considered as likely becomes doubtful, a provision for an impairment loss is then recorded (see
note 2b above).
Note 3
Changes in consolidated companies
The main changes in consolidated companies for the first six months of 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
On January 27, 2006, Alcatel acquired a 27.5% stake in 2Wire, a pioneer in home
broadband network solutions, for a purchase price of USD 122 million in cash. This company
is consolidated under the equity method and its contribution to Alcatels first semester
2006 net income is not significant. |
|
|
|
|
On April 2, 2006, Alcatel and Lucent Technologies announced that they had entered into
a definitive merger agreement to create the first truly global communications solutions
provider. |
|
|
|
|
The boards of directors of both companies have approved the transaction. Under the terms of
the agreement, Lucent shareholders will receive 0.1952 of an ADS (American Depositary Share)
representing ordinary shares of Alcatel (as the combined company) for every common share of
Lucent that they currently hold. Upon completion of the merger, Alcatel shareholders will
own approximately 60 % of the combined company and Lucent shareholders will own
approximately 40% of the combined company. The combined companys ordinary shares will
continue to be traded on the Euronext Paris and the ADSs representing ordinary shares will
continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
|
|
|
The combined company resulting from this merger will be incorporated in France, with its
headquarters located in Paris. The North American operations will be based in New Jersey,
U.S.A., where global Bell Labs will remain headquartered. The board of directors of the
combined company will be composed of 14 members and will have equal representation from each
company, including Serge Tchuruk and Patricia Russo, five of Alcatels current directors and
five of Lucents current directors. The board will also include two new independent European
directors to be mutually agreed upon. |
|
|
|
|
The combined company intends to form a specific U.S. subsidiary holding certain contracts
with U.S. government agencies and will be subject to reinforced confidentiality and security
conditions. A board of directors, comprising three independent U.S. citizens acceptable to
the U.S. government, will manage separately this subsidiary. |
|
|
|
|
The merger is subject to customary regulatory and governmental approvals in the United
States, Europe and elsewhere (many of which have already been obtained), as well as the
approval by shareholders of both companies and other customary conditions. The transaction
is expected to be completed in six to twelve months from the signing of the merger
agreement. Until the merger is completed, both companies will continue to operate their
businesses independently. |
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter 2006, Alcatel acquired privately-held VoiceGenie for 30
million in cash. Founded in 2000, VoiceGenie is a leader in voice self service solutions,
with a software platform based on Voice XML, an open standard used for developing
self-service applications by both enterprises and carriers. The initial allocation of the
cost of the business combination led to recognizing USD 13 million of depreciable
intangible assets and USD 18 million of goodwill, with the net assets of this company
amounting to USD 7 million at the acquisition date (of which USD 4 million of cash and
cash equivalents). The contribution of this company to Alcatels first semester 2006
results is not significant. |
F-19
|
|
|
On April 5, 2006, Alcatel announced that the Board of Directors of Thales had approved
the acquisition in principle of Alcatels satellite subsidiaries, its railway signalling
business and its integration and services activities for mission-critical systems. As a
result of the issuance of the shares to Alcatel in the context of the acquisition, Alcatel
would strengthen its position as the reference private shareholder of Thales, with a 21.6%
stake, while Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault would keep its 5% share and the French
State would remain the majority shareholder with 27.1%. With this transaction, the
industrial and commercial partnership between Alcatel and Thales would be strengthened. |
|
|
|
The transaction would primarily consist in the contribution by Alcatel to Thales of the
following assets: |
|
|
|
Alcatels 67% stake in the capital of Alcatel Alenia Space (this joint venture
company, created in 2005, is the result of bringing together Alcatels and
Finmeccanicas assets, the latter holding a 33% stake). |
|
|
|
|
Alcatels 33% share in the capital of Telespazio, worldwide leader in satellite
services, whose majority stake of 67% is held by Finmeccanica. |
|
2. |
|
In the domain of critical systems for security : |
|
|
|
The Transport Systems activities, a worldwide leader in signalling solutions
for rail transport and urban metros. |
|
|
|
|
Systems Integration activities not dedicated to telecoms operators, and
covering mainly the transport and energy sectors. |
|
|
|
The total revenues of these activities, based on 2005 accounts, amounted to approximately
2 billion. The workforce represents approximately 11,000 people, mainly in France, Germany,
Italy and Canada. All the assets concerned by the contemplated transaction are part of the
Private Communications segment. |
|
|
|
|
Thales would make a cash payment to Alcatel that was estimated in early April 2006 at 0.7
billion, which would be payable upon closing the transaction. Price adjustment clauses are
also foreseen. |
|
|
|
|
The assets the contribution of which is envisaged have not been accounted for as assets held
for sale in the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements at June 30,
2006, as the criteria for classification in assets held for sale as defined by IFRS 5
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations were not met at the balance
sheet date, due to the fact that the assets held for sale were not available for immediate
sale in their present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales
of such assets, their sale was not highly probable at June 30, 2006, and that: |
|
|
|
the parties involved had not signed any contract at the balance sheet date; |
|
|
|
|
a significant part of the assets to be transferred are integral to companies
that have activities that are not covered by the agreement in principle, requiring a
certain reorganization to be carried out prior to the contribution (such reorganization
was already in progress at June 30, 2006); |
|
|
|
|
amendments to the shareholders agreement between the French State and the
industrial partners (Alcatel and Dassault) were still under discussion and not yet
finalized at the balance sheet date. Only an examination of the definitive
shareholders agreement would reveal how Thales may be consolidated in Alcatels
consolidated financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
the transaction is subject not only to the customary anti-trust authorizations
(the requests to obtain such approvals not yet having been initiated as of June 30,
2006) but also to the formal approvals of the French State, the main shareholder of
Thales, of Lucent (due to the merger agreement as described above) and of our partner
in the Space sector (Finmeccanica). |
The main changes in consolidated companies for 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
On March 2, 2005, Alcatel announced the acquisition of 100 % of Native Networks, a
provider of carrier-class optical Ethernet transport solutions, for a purchase price of
USD 55 million. The purchase price was allocated USD 20 million to depreciable intangible
assets and USD 38 million to goodwill, the net assets of this company being negative USD 3
million at the acquisition (of which USD 0,3 million of cash and cash equivalents). The
contribution from this company had no impact on Alcatels 2005 income. |
F-20
|
|
|
On May 17, 2005, TCL Corp. and Alcatel announced the end of their handset partnership.
Alcatel agreed to swap its 45% stake in the joint venture for TCL Communication Holdings
Ltd shares (these shares are listed on the Hong Kong market). |
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2005, Alcatel and Finmeccanica announced the successful creation of two
joint ventures that had been described in a memorandum of understanding signed by the
parties on June 24, 2004: Alcatel Alenia Space (Alcatel holds 67 % and Finmeccanica 33%)
and Telespazio Holding (Finmeccanica holds 67 % and Alcatel 33%). These joint ventures are
consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method starting July 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Alcatel analyzes this transaction as a sale to Finmeccanica of 33% of Alcatel Spaces
satellite industrial activity and 67% of its service activity and as an acquisition of 67%
of Alenia Spazio (the industrial space systems of Finmeccanica) and of 33% of Telespazio
(service activities for Finmeccanicas space systems). |
|
|
|
|
The values assigned to this transaction are 1,530 million for Alenia Space and 215
million for Telespazio, resulting in a gain to Alcatel on the sale before tax of 129
million in 2005 and in goodwill of 145 million. Alcatel received from Finmeccanica an
equalization payment of 109 million. Net cash resulting from the activities acquired and
disposed of is 15 million at the transaction date. Due to the existence of price
adjustment clauses in the agreement between Alcatel and Finmeccanica, corrections could be
made later to the above amounts, once the amounts of these price adjustments are known and
agreed to by the parties concerned. |
|
|
|
|
Proportionately consolidating the combined space activities of the two partners did not have
a significant impact on Alcatels revenues, operating margin and total balance sheet.
However, this consolidation method resulted in recognizing a deferred tax charge for 2005 of
38 million due to the removal from the French tax consolidation of the companies
transferred to the joint ventures in the context of the transaction described above. |
Note 4
Information by business segment and by geographical segment
(a) Information by business segment
(1) Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Fixed communications |
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Mobile communications |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Private communications |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Between segments |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring, share-based payments,
impairment of capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of consolidated entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Fixed communications |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Mobile communications |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Private communications |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Income (loss) from operating activities before restructuring, share-based payments, impairment of
capitalized development costs and gain on disposal of consolidated entities and excluding capital
gain/loss on disposal of tangible and intangible assets (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Fixed communications |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Mobile communications |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Private communications |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The principal net gain on disposal of assets recognized in the first semester of 2006 was the
disposal of real estate classified in assets held for sale at December 31, 2005. |
(b) Information by geographical segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western |
|
Rest of |
|
Asia |
|
North |
|
Rest of |
|
Conso- |
|
|
France |
|
Germany |
|
Europe |
|
Europe |
|
Pacific |
|
America |
|
World |
|
lidated |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Six months ended
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by geographical market |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
by subsidiary location |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by geographical market |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
by subsidiary location |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
Note 5
Research and development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Research costs |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs, net |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer design engineering costs |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Capitalized development costs |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development effort |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
In accordance with IFRSs, development costs meeting certain criteria described in note 1f are
capitalized.
As certain capitalization criteria required by IAS 38 Intangible Assets could not be met for
2002 and prior years, due primarily to the lack of information systems monitoring development costs
and testing their eligibility for capitalization, full retrospective application of IAS 38 at
January 1, 2004 has not been possible. Such systems were put in place during 2003.
To facilitate an analysis of the Groups accounts and to better appreciate the ramp-up effect
of the capitalization of development costs, the net capitalization impact (expenses capitalized
less amortization of previously capitalized expenses) is presented in impact of capitalization of
development expenses in the income statement and is also separately identified in the net cash
provided (used) by operating activities before changes in working capital (impact of amortization
of capitalized expenses) and in the net cash provided (used) by investing activities (impact of
capitalization of development expenses during the period).
F-22
Note 6
Share-based payment (stock option plans)
Only stock option plans established after November 7, 2002, and whose stock options were not
yet fully vested at January 1, 2005, are accounted for according to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment.
Those stock options that were fully vested at December 31, 2004 therefore do not result in a charge
either in 2004 or in subsequent accounting periods.
By simplification, no option cancellations (which could occur during the vesting period and as
a result of employees leaving the Group) are considered when determining compensation expense for
stock options granted. The accounting impact of actual option cancellations occurring during the
vesting period, and as a result of employees leaving the Group, is recognized when the cancellation
is made. For options cancelled before the end of the vesting period, this can mean correcting the
charge, recognized in prior accounting periods, in the period following the cancellation.
Options cancelled after the vesting period and options not exercised do not result in
correcting charges previously recognized.
Fair value of granted options
The fair value of stock options is measured using the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial model. This
allows behavioral factors governing the exercise of stock options to be taken into consideration
and to consider that all options will not be systematically exercised by the end of the exercise
period. The expected volatility is determined as being the implied volatility at the grant date.
Assumptions for the plans representing more than 1,000,000 outstanding options are as follows:
|
|
|
expected volatility: 60 % for the 2002 and March 2003 plans, 40% for the 2004 and 2005
plans and 32% for the later plans ; |
|
|
|
|
risk-free rate: 4.58 % for the 2002 plans, 3.84% for the March 2003 plan, 3.91% for the
March 2004 plan, 3.50% for the March 2005 plan and 3.50% for the March 2006 plan ; |
|
|
|
|
distribution rate on future income: 0 % in 2003, 2004 and 2005 and 1 % for later years. |
Based on these assumptions, the fair values of options used in the calculation of compensation
expense for share-based payments are as follows:
|
|
|
2002 plans: weighted average fair value of 2.48 ; |
|
|
|
|
March 2003 plan with an exercise price of 6.70 : fair value of 3.31; |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 plan with an exercise price of 13.20 : fair value of 5.06 ; |
|
|
|
|
March 2005 plan with an exercise price of 10.00 : fair value of 3.72 ; |
|
|
|
|
March 2006 plan with an exercise price of 11.70 : fair value of 3.77 |
|
|
|
|
Other plans have fair values between 2.89 and 5.08 and a weighted average fair value of 3.86. |
Impact on net income (loss) of share-based payments resulting from stock option or stock purchase
plans
Compensation expense recognized for share-based payments in accordance with IFRS 2 is analyzed
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Share-based payment expense |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire expense recognized in application of IFRS 2 concerns share-based payments. None of
these transactions results in the outflow of cash.
Characteristics of subscription stock option plans or stock purchase plans recognized in
compliance with IFRS 2
Vesting conditions:
The following rules are applicable to all plans granted in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
Vesting is gradual: options vest in successive portions over 4 years, for which 25% of
the options are vested if the employee remains employed after 12 months and, for each month
after the first year, 1/48th additional options are vested if the employee remains employed
by the Group. |
|
|
|
|
Exercise period depends on countries: in some countries, stock options can be exercised
as soon as they are vested; in other countries, a four-year period of inalienability
exists. Whatever the beginning of the period is, stock options terminate 8 years after the
grant date. |
F-23
Exceptionally, certain plans that existed in companies acquired in a business combination
have been converted into Alcatel subscription stock option plans or stock purchase plans. The
vesting conditions are not necessarily aligned to Alcatels vesting conditions.
Conditions of settlement:
All stock options granted are exclusively settled in shares.
Number of options granted and change in number of options
Stock option plans covered by IFRS 2 and the change in number of stock options generating
compensation expense are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Plans |
|
2003 Plans |
|
2004 Plans |
|
2005 Plans |
|
2006 Plans |
|
Total |
|
|
4,60 to |
|
|
|
|
|
7.60 to |
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 to |
|
|
|
|
|
8.80 to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price |
|
5.40 |
|
6.70 |
|
11.20 |
|
13.20 |
|
13.10 |
|
10.00 |
|
11.41 |
|
11.70 |
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
Exercise period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From |
|
|
14/11/03 |
|
|
|
07/03/04 |
|
|
|
18/06/04 |
|
|
|
10/03/05 |
|
|
|
01/04/05 |
|
|
|
10/03/06 |
|
|
|
03/01/06 |
|
|
|
08/03/07 |
|
|
|
15/05/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/06 |
|
|
|
07/03/07 |
|
|
|
01/12/07 |
|
|
|
10/03/08 |
|
|
|
01/12/08 |
|
|
|
10/03/09 |
|
|
|
14/11/09 |
|
|
|
08/03/10 |
|
|
|
15/05/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
To |
|
|
13/11/10 |
|
|
|
06/30/11 |
|
|
|
17/06/11 |
|
|
|
09/03/12 |
|
|
|
31/03/12 |
|
|
|
09/03/13 |
|
|
|
31/01/13 |
|
|
|
07/03/14 |
|
|
|
14/05/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/12/10 |
|
|
|
06/30/11 |
|
|
|
30/11/11 |
|
|
|
09/03/12 |
|
|
|
30/11/12 |
|
|
|
09/03/13 |
|
|
|
13/11/13 |
|
|
|
07/03/14 |
|
|
|
14/05/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31,
2004 |
|
|
65,181 |
|
|
|
12,079,954 |
|
|
|
536,493 |
|
|
|
17,370,250 |
|
|
|
775,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,827,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,756,690 |
|
|
|
848,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,604,940 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(20,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,172,079 |
) |
|
|
(10,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,203,203 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,907 |
) |
|
|
(357,667 |
) |
|
|
(44,854 |
) |
|
|
(1,017,737 |
) |
|
|
(74,592 |
) |
|
|
(707,210 |
) |
|
|
(26,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,233,167 |
) |
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31,
2005 |
|
|
39,500 |
|
|
|
10,550,208 |
|
|
|
481,589 |
|
|
|
16,352,513 |
|
|
|
700,608 |
|
|
|
16,049,480 |
|
|
|
822,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,995,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which could be
exercised |
|
|
29,189 |
|
|
|
5,809,745 |
|
|
|
271,665 |
|
|
|
7,316,197 |
|
|
|
208,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,634,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,009,320 |
|
|
|
122,850 |
|
|
|
17,132,170 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
(1,151,896 |
) |
|
|
(31,001 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(9,990 |
) |
|
|
(139,789 |
) |
|
|
(7,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,341,758 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(186,651 |
) |
|
|
(58,422 |
) |
|
|
(608,244 |
) |
|
|
(31,648 |
) |
|
|
(385,926 |
) |
|
|
(32,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,303,933 |
) |
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
37,952 |
|
|
|
9,211,661 |
|
|
|
392,166 |
|
|
|
15,743,569 |
|
|
|
658,970 |
|
|
|
15,523,765 |
|
|
|
782,174 |
|
|
|
17,009,320 |
|
|
|
122,850 |
|
|
|
59,482,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which could be
exercised |
|
|
32,659 |
|
|
|
6,350,713 |
|
|
|
253,344 |
|
|
|
8,943,749 |
|
|
|
300,859 |
|
|
|
4,505,213 |
|
|
|
172,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,558,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
share price at
exercise date for
options exercised
during the first
six months of 2006 |
|
|
12,87 |
|
|
|
11,79 |
|
|
|
11,83 |
|
|
|
11,00 |
|
|
|
11,90 |
|
|
|
12,12 |
|
|
|
12,30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,82 |
|
Note 7
Financial income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Finance costs |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Dividends |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Provisions for financial risks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on financial assets (2) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Financial component of pension costs |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Actual and potential capital gain/(loss)
on financial assets (shares of equity
affiliates or non-consolidated
securities and financial receivables)
and marketable securities (3) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
116 |
(1) |
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial cost |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial income (loss) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As indicated in note 1u, certain marketable securities previously included in the category
of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are now designated as financial
assets available for sale, further to the Fair Value Option amendment to IAS 39 Financial
Instruments : Recognition and Measurement. The impact of this change on other financial
income (loss) is 10 million for the first half of 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Impairment loss of 23 million on the Avanex shares recorded in the first and second quarter
of 2005 due to an unfavorable change in market price. |
|
(3) |
|
Net gain on disposal of Alcatels stake in Nexans for 69 million during the first quarter
of 2005 and net gain on disposal of Mobilrom shares for 45 million during the second quarter
of 2005. |
F-24
Note 8
Discontinued operations, assets held for sale and liabilities related to disposal groups held for sale
Discontinued operations for the first six months of 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
In the first six months of 2006 and 2005: no discontinued operations. Initial capital
gain (loss) on discontinued operations that were sold in 2004 was adjusted in the first six
months of 2006 and 2005 due to the changes in ongoing legal proceedings related to these
disposals. |
Other assets held for sale concern real estate property sales in progress at June 30, 2006,
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005.
Income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Income (loss) on discontinued operations |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Assets of disposal groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets held for sale |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to disposal groups held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statements of discontinued operations for the first semester of 2005 and 2006 in
accordance with IFRSs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative and selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital gain (loss) on disposal of consolidated entities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operating |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cash flows of discontinued operations in accordance with IFRSs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
before changes in working capital |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other net increase (decrease) in net cash provided
(used) by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities (1) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) + (2) + (3) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
Note 9
Income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Current income tax (charge) benefit |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Deferred income tax (charge) benefit, net |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (charge) benefit |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on forecast tax results of different subsidiaries in the Group, net deferred tax assets
of 87 million were recorded during the first semester of 2005 mainly in Europe and North
America.
The current income tax charge of 42 million for the first semester 2006 (of which 33
million for the second quarter 2006) relates to changes in provisions for tax litigation, and to
countries in which the Group has no tax loss carry forwards.
Note 10
Earnings per share
(a) Number of shares comprising the capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
June 30, 2006 |
|
Shares |
Number of ordinary shares issued (share capital) |
|
|
1,430,777,113 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(58,246,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares in circulation |
|
|
1,372,530,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighting effect of share issues for stock options exercised |
|
|
(866,021 |
) |
Weighting effect of treasury shares |
|
|
(303,448 |
) |
Weighting effect of share issues in respect of business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used for calculating basic earnings per share |
|
|
1,371,360,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
June 30, 2005 |
|
Shares |
Number of ordinary shares issued (share capital) |
|
|
1,306,565,122 |
|
Number of ORANE to be issued |
|
|
120,778,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(59,362,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares in circulation |
|
|
1,367,981,550 |
|
Weighting effect of share issues for stock options exercised |
|
|
(648,602 |
) |
Weighting effect of treasury shares |
|
|
(247,974 |
) |
Weighting effect of share issues in respect of business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used for calculating basic earnings per share |
|
|
1,367,084,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
December 31, 2005 |
|
Shares |
Number of ordinary shares issued (share capital) |
|
|
1,428,541,640 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(58,920,710 |
) |
Number of shares in circulation |
|
|
1,369,620,930 |
|
Weighting effect of share issues for stock options exercised |
|
|
(1,223,804 |
) |
Weighting effect of treasury shares |
|
|
(402,473 |
) |
Weighting effect of share issues in respect of business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used for calculating basic earnings per share |
|
|
1,367,994,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Earnings per share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
Number of shares |
|
|
amount |
|
Basic earnings per share,
attributable to the equity
holders of the parent |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
1,371,360,733 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
Stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,737,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share,
attributable to the equity
holders of the parent |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
1,381,098,021 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Ordinary shares:
Consolidated subsidiaries of the Group owned 58,550,359 Alcatel ordinary shares and no share
equivalents at June 30, 2006.
Shares subject to future issuance:
The number of stock options not exercised as of June 30, 2006 amounted to 142,674,291 shares.
Only 9,737,288 share equivalents have been taken into account for the calculation of the diluted
earnings per share, as the remaining share equivalents had an anti-dilutive effect.
Furthermore, 63,192,019 new or existing Alcatel ordinary shares, which are issuable in respect
of Alcatels convertible bonds (OCEANE) issued on June 12, 2003, have not been taken into account
in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share amount due to their anti-dilutive effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
Number of shares |
|
|
amount |
|
Basic earnings per share,
attributable to the equity
holders of the parent |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,367,084,974 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,520,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share,
attributable to the equity
holders of the parent |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,375,605,804 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares:
Consolidated subsidiaries of the Group owned 59,610,065 Alcatel ordinary shares and no share
equivalents at June 30, 2005.
Shares subject to future issuance:
The number of stock options not exercised as of June 30, 2005 amounted to 154,549,981 shares.
Only 8,520,830 share equivalents have been taken into account for the calculation of the diluted
earnings per share, as the remaining share equivalents had an anti-dilutive effect.
Furthermore, 63,192,019 new or existing Alcatel ordinary shares, which are issuable in respect
of Alcatels convertible bonds (OCEANE) issued on June 12, 2003, have not been taken into account
in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share amount due to their anti-dilutive effect.
Note 11
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
Other assets |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Other current assets |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
160 |
(1) |
|
|
468 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other currency derivatives |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Interest-rate derivatives |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Other current and non current assets |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
Other liabilities |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
2005 |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other currency derivatives |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Interest-rate derivatives |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Other current and non current liabilities |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The carry-back receivable that was sold in 2002 (see note 18) and that was due after one
year at December 31, 2005 and at June 30, 2005 and thus classified in other non-current assets
is now presented in the balance sheet caption current income taxes. |
F-27
Note 12
Operating working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Inventories and work in progress, net |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Trade receivables and related accounts, net |
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
Advances and progress payments |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Advances and customer deposits |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
(3,755 |
) |
Amounts due from customers on construction contracts |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Amounts due to customers on construction contracts |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Currency derivatives related to on working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating working capital net |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
Translation |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cash |
|
consolidated |
|
adjustments |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Flow |
|
companies |
|
and other |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Inventories and work in progress (1) |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
2,445 |
|
Trade receivables and related accounts (1) |
|
|
4,348 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
3,940 |
|
Advances and progress payments |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
,126 |
|
Advances and customer deposits (1) |
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
Trade payable and related accounts |
|
|
(3,755 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating working capital gross |
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales reserve construction contracts (1) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating working capital net |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including amounts relating to construction contracts presented in the balance sheet
captions amounts due from/to customers on construction contracts. |
Amount of receivables sold without recourse
Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Receivables sold without recourse (1) |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See accounting policies in note 1s. |
Changes in receivables sold without recourse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
Six months |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Impact on cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
F-28
Note 13
Share in net assets of equity affiliates and joint ventures
(a) Share in net assets of equity affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage owned |
|
Value |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December |
|
June 30, |
|
December |
|
|
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Thales (1) |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Draka Comteq BV (2) |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
2Wire (3) |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (less than 50 million) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share in net assets of equity
affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Although Alcatel only has a 9.5% stake in Thales, Alcatel is nevertheless the largest
private shareholder of this group, with three seats on Thales Board of Directors. Due to the
Groups continuing significant influence on this company, Alcatel still accounts for Thales
using the equity method. At June 30, 2006, Alcatels stake was 9.5% (12.8% in voting rights).
|
|
|
|
In view of the timing of the publication of Thales financial statements, and as this equity
affiliate is listed on a securities exchange, the Groups share of net income (loss) is
calculated based on the most recently published financial statements under IFRSs. It does not
therefore include, due to the rules of communication applicable to listed companies, any possible
non-published information between two publication dates that may have been obtained by the
directors representing Alcatel on the Thales Board of Directors. The Groups share of net income
(loss) accounted for during the first semester 2006 corresponds to Thales results for the second
half of 2005 and first half of 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Under the agreement, dated July 2, 2004, between Alcatel and Draka Holding BV concerning the
business combination of the optical fiber and communication cable activities of the two
groups, a new company Draka Comteq BV was created. Alcatel owns 49.9% of this new company,
which is consolidated under the equity method beginning July 1, 2004. |
|
(3) |
|
During the first quarter 2006, Alcatel acquired a 27.5% stake in 2Wire (see note 3). |
Alcatels share in the market capitalization of listed equity affiliates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Thales |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Change in share of net assets of equity affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve month |
|
|
Six month period |
|
period ending |
|
|
ending June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Carrying amount at the beginning of the period |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in equity affiliates |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Share of net income (loss) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Net effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
Other changes |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at the end of the period |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Note 14
Compound instruments (ORANE and OCEANE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORANE (1) |
|
OCEANE |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves (prepaid interest) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves (equity component) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible bonds due after one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Convertible bonds due within one
year (interest paid and payable) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs relating to gross debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The notes were entirely redeemed on December 23, 2005 by the issuance of 120,769,959
shares. |
Note 15
Provisions
(a) Balance at closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December |
|
|
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Provisions for product sales |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Provisions for restructuring |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Provisions for litigation |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other provisions |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Of which : portion expected to be used within one year |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
portion expected to be used after one year |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
(b) Change during the first six months ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
Appropria- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
31, 2005 |
|
tion |
|
Utilization |
|
Reversals |
|
companies |
|
Other |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Provisions for product sales (a) |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
Provisions for restructuring |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
Provisions for litigation |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Other provisions |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on the income statement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operating
activities before
restructuring, share-based
payments, impairment of
capitalized development costs
and gain on disposal of
consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
other financial income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
income (loss) from
discontinued operations and
gain/(loss) on disposal of
consolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excluding provisions for product sales on construction contracts which are now accounted
for in amounts due to/from customers on construction contracts (see note 12). |
F-30
At June 30, 2006, contingent liabilities exist with regard to ongoing tax disputes.
Neither the financial impact nor the timing of any outflows of resources that could result from an
unfavorable outcome of these disputes can be estimated at present. Nevertheless, the Group is
confident in the favorable outcome of these ongoing disputes.
(c) Analysis of restructuring provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December |
|
|
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Opening balance |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization during period |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
New plans and adjustments to previous estimates (1) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Effect of acquisition (disposal) of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments and other changes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total restructuring costs were 31 million for the first semester of 2006 ( 110
million for 2005), representing an allowance of asset impairment losses of 4 million
(reversal of 11 million for the year 2005) and 27 million ( 121 million for the
year 2005) of new restructuring plans and adjustments to previous plans. In addition, a
finance cost of 1 million for the first semester 2006, and 11 million for 2005,
related to reversing the discount element included in provisions, was recorded in other
financial income (loss). |
For 2005, the costs relate primarily to restructuring plans in Western Europe (Germany,
Spain, France).
Note 16
Financial debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Marketable securities, net |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalent and marketable securities |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Convertible and other bonds long-term portion) |
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
(Other long-term debt) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
(Current portion of long-term debt) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Financial debt, gross) |
|
|
(3,545 |
) |
|
|
(3,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative interest rate instruments other current and non-current assets |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Derivative interest rate instruments other current and non-current liabilities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash net (financial debt net) |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Bonds
Balances at December 31, 2005 and at June 30, 2006 :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
1st semester |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Remaining amounts to be reimbursed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero-rate coupon due June 2006 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
7% EUR due December 2006 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
401 |
|
5.625% EUR due March 2007 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
4.375% EUR due February 2009 |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
805 |
|
Oceane 4,75% due January 2011 |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
6.375% EUR due April 2014 |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component of Oceane |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Fair value of interest rate
instruments relating to bonds and
expenses included in the
calculation of the effective
interest rate |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Changes during the first six months of 2006:
Repurchases:
Certain bonds were subject to buy-back and cancellation in the first half of 2006, amounting
to 81 million and corresponding to a nominal value of 79 million, detailed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased bonds |
|
Nominal value repurchased |
|
7.00% EUR due December 2006 |
|
|
24,810,000 |
|
4.375% EUR due February 2009 |
|
|
54,166,000 |
|
The difference between the repurchased amount and the nominal value, corresponding to a charge of
2 million, was included in other financial income (expense).
Changes in 2005:
Repurchases
Certain bonds were subject to buy-back and cancellation in 2005, amounting to 291 million and
corresponding to a nominal value of 280 million, detailed as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase bonds |
|
Nominal value repurchased |
|
5.875% EUR due September 2005 |
|
|
51,627,000 |
|
Zero-rate coupon due June 2006 |
|
|
4,838,724 |
|
5.625 % EUR due March 2007 |
|
|
150,925 |
|
7.00% EUR due December 2006 |
|
|
72,603,000 |
|
4.375% EUR due February 2009 |
|
|
150,676,000 |
|
The difference between the repurchased amount and the nominal value, corresponding to a charge of
11 million, was included in other financial income (expense).
Repayments
The balance of the bonds carrying interest at 5.875% was repaid in September 2005 for a residual
nominal amount of 524.7 million.
(b) Credit rating
At July 26, 2006, Alcatel credit ratings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
Last update of |
|
Last update of |
Rating Agency |
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
|
Outlook |
|
the rating |
|
the outlook |
Moodys |
|
Ba1 |
|
Not Prime |
|
Under review, |
|
April 11, 2005 |
|
April 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
negative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors |
|
BB |
|
|
B |
|
|
Under |
|
November 10, 2004 |
|
March 24, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
observation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys : On April 3, 2006, Moodys put Alcatels credit rating under review in view of a
possible downgrading of its long-term debt rating (Ba1). This action followed Alcatels
confirmation of discussions with Lucent Technologies regarding a possible merger and was
motivated by the strategic and operational changes along which such a merger could lead Alcatel.
The ratings themselves (Ba1 and NP) remain unchanged.
Standard & Poors : On March 10, 2006, Standard & Poors changed Alcatels long-term debt credit
rating (BB) outlook from Outlook Stable to Outlook Positive. However, on March 24, 2006,
following Alcatels announcement of its discussions with Lucent Technologies of a possible merger
of the two groups, Standard & Poors placed Alcatels credit rating under observation,
considering that, if the merger went ahead, a downgrading of the long-term debt rating could be
envisaged due to the financial structure of the combined entity. The ratings themselves (BB and
B) remain unchanged.
F-32
Recent history of Alcatels long-term debt credit rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Moodys |
|
Date |
|
Standard & Poors |
April 11, 2005
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Outlook Positive
|
|
November 10, 2004
|
|
BB
|
|
Outlook Stable |
September 8, 2004
|
|
Ba3
|
|
Outlook Positive
|
|
March 10, 2004
|
|
BB-
|
|
Outlook Stable |
May 10, 2004
|
|
B1
|
|
Outlook Positive
|
|
August 11, 2003
|
|
B+
|
|
Outlook Stable |
December 5, 2003
|
|
B1
|
|
Outlook Stable
|
|
October 4, 2002
|
|
B+
|
|
Outlook Negative |
November 20, 2002
|
|
B1
|
|
Outlook Negative
|
|
July 12, 2002
|
|
BB+
|
|
Outlook Negative |
Rating clauses affecting Alcatel debt at June 30, 2006
Alcatels short-term debt rating allows a limited access to the commercial paper market. Alcatels
outstanding bonds do not contain clauses that could trigger an accelerated repayment in the event
of a lowering of its credit ratings. However, the 1.2 billion bond issue maturing in December 2006
includes a step up rating change clause, which provides that the interest rate is increased by
150 basis points if Alcatels ratings fall below investment grade. This clause was triggered when
Alcatels credit rating was lowered to below investment grade status in July 2002. The 150 basis
point increase in the interest rate from 7% to 8.5% became effective in December 2002, and was
first applied to the payment of the December 2003 coupon. This bond issue also contains a step
down rating change clause that provides that the interest rate will be decreased by 150 basis
points if Alcatels ratings with both agencies move back to investment grade level. However, this
interest rate decrease will not take place since the condition relating to Alcatels ratings was
not met before June 30, 2006.
Syndicated bank credit facility
On March 15, 2005, Alcatel amended the three-year multi-currency revolving facility that had
been put in place on June 21, 2004. Consequently, the maturity of the line was lengthened from June
2007 to June 2009, the financial conditions were improved and one of the financial covenants was
eliminated. Moreover, Alcatel decided to reduce the amount of this revolving facility from 1,300
million to 1,000 million.
The availability of this syndicated credit facility of 1,000 million is not dependent upon
Alcatels credit ratings. At June 30, 2006, the credit facility had not been drawn and remained
undrawn at the date of approval by Alcatels Board of Directors of the unaudited condensed interim
consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Alcatels ability to draw
on this facility is conditioned upon its compliance with a financial covenant linked to the
capacity of Alcatel to generate sufficient cash to repay its net debt. As the Group had cash and
cash equivalents in excess of its gross financial debt at June 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, the above-mentioned financial covenant was not applicable at these dates.
Note 17
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities before changes in working capital, interest and
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Net income (loss) attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible assets |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Of which impact of capitalized development costs |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in pension obligations, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Provisions, impairment losses and fair value changes |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
Net (gain) loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Share in net income (losses) of equity affiliates (net of
dividends received) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Finance costs |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total of adjustments |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities before changes
in working capital, interest and taxes |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Note 18
Off-balance sheet commitments
(a) Contractual obligations
The following table presents minimum payments the Group will have to make in the future under
contracts and firm commitments as of June 30, 2006. Amounts related to financial debt and capital
lease obligations are fully reflected in the consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity date |
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 and |
|
|
|
|
one year |
|
2007-2008 |
|
2009-2010 |
|
after |
|
Total |
Contractual cash obligations |
|
(In millions of euros) |
Financial debt (excluding finance leases) |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
Finance lease obligations |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Equity component of Oceane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total included in balance sheet |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses on financial debt |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
Commitments to purchase fixed assets |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Unconditional purchase obligations(1) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub total Commitments |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other unconditional purchase obligations result mainly from obligations under multi-year
supply contracts linked to the sale of businesses to third parties. |
(b) Off-balance sheet commitments
Off-balance sheet commitments of the Group were primarily as follows:
|
|
|
certain guarantees given to the Groups customers for contract execution (performance
bonds and guarantees on advances received that were issued by Alcatel to financial
institutions); |
|
|
|
|
guarantee relating to the maximum intra-day bank overdraft allowed for Group subsidiaries
under the Groups cash pooling agreement with certain banks; |
|
|
|
|
guarantees given under securitization programs or on sale of receivables (see description
below). |
Alcatel does not rely on special purpose entities to deconsolidate these risks.
Commitments given in the normal course of business of the Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December |
|
|
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Guarantees given on contracts made by
entities within the Group and by
non-consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
Other contingent commitments |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total Contingent commitments |
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments related to product warranties, pension and end-of-career indemnities are not
included in the preceding table. These commitments are fully reflected in the financial statements.
Contingent liabilities arising out of litigation, arbitration or regulatory actions are not
included in the preceding table with the exception of those linked to Group long-term contracts.
For more information concerning litigation, see note 19.
Not included in the preceding table is a guarantee granted to the banks operating the Groups
cash pooling. This guarantee covers the risk involved in any overdrawn position that could remain
outstanding after the many daily transfers between Alcatels Central Treasury accounts and those of
its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2006, this guarantee amounted to 0.6 billion (0.7 billion as of
June 30, 2005 and 0.6 billion as of December 31, 2005).
F-34
|
|
|
Sale of carry-back receivable |
In May 2002, Alcatel sold to a credit institution a carry-back receivable with a face value of
200 million resulting from Alcatels decision to carry back 2001 tax losses. This receivable is
maintained in the consolidated balance sheet with a financial debt as counterpart because of the
ability of the Group to recover it before its maturity date.
Alcatel is required to indemnify the purchaser in case of any error or inaccuracy concerning
the amount or nature of the receivable sold. The sale will be retroactively cancelled in the event
of a modification to the law or regulations that substantially changes the rights attached to the
receivable sold.
|
|
|
Securitization of customer receivables |
In December 2003, Alcatel entered into a securitization program for the sale of customer
receivables without recourse. Eligible receivables are sold to a special purpose vehicle, which
benefits from a subordinated financing from the Group representing an over-collateralization
determined on the basis of the portfolio of receivables sold. This special purpose vehicle is fully
consolidated in accordance with SIC 12. The receivables sold at June 30, 2006, which amounted to
75 million (69 million at June 30, 2005 and 61 million at December 31, 2005), are therefore
maintained in the consolidated balance sheet. At June 30, 2006, the maximum amount of receivables
that can be sold amounted to 150 million (150 million at June 30, 2005 and 150 million at
December 31, 2004), representing a credit line available to the Group. This amount can be increased
to 250 million. The purpose of this securitization program is to optimize the management and
recovery of receivables in addition to providing extra financing.
Note 19
Contingencies
In addition to legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business (including
employment-related collective actions in France and the U.S.) which management believes are
adequately reserved against in the financial statements or will not result in any significant costs
to the Group, Alcatel is involved in the following legal proceedings:
France Telecom
Since 1993, a legal investigation has been ongoing concerning overbillings which are alleged
to have been committed in Alcatel CIT to the detriment of its principal client, France Telecom,
based on an audit of production costs conducted in 1989 in the transmission division, and in 1992
in the switching division. Two settlement agreements were entered into with France Telecom, one in
1993 in relation to the transmission division, and the other in May 2004 in relation to the
switching activity: in the latter it was recognized that the parties dispute on pricing did not
involve fraud by Alcatel CIT.
In April 1999, Alcatel learned that the criminal investigation had been extended to determine
whether corporate funds of Alcatel CIT and Alcatel had been misused. As a consequence, both Alcatel
CIT and Alcatel filed civil complaints to preserve their rights with respect to this investigation.
The investigating magistrate has recently closed his judicial inquiry. Pursuant to his ruling
of May 16, 2006, an ex-employee of Alcatel CIT and two of his supervisors, each of whom left the
Group several years ago, will be brought before the criminal court of Evry for the overbilling that
allegedly occurred in the transmission division. On the other hand, the judge ruled that there are
no grounds for the prosecution of all the other suspects (three in the transmission division and
seven in the switching division), which include Alcatel CIT. Alcatel CIT remains a party to the
procedure as a plaintiff pursuant to its civil complaint.
Class A
and Class O shareholders
Several purported class action lawsuits have been filed since May 2002 against Alcatel and
certain of its officers and directors challenging the accuracy of certain public disclosures that
were made in the prospectus for the initial public offering of Alcatel Class O shares and in other
public statements regarding market demand for the former Optronics divisions products.
The lawsuits purport to be brought on behalf of persons who (i) acquired Alcatel Class O
shares in or pursuant to the initial public offering of the American Depositary Shares conducted by
Alcatel in October 2000, (ii) purchased Alcatel Class A and Class O shares in the form of ADSs
between October 20, 2000 and May 29, 2001 and (iii) purchased Alcatel Class A shares in the form of
ADSs between May 1, 2000 and May 29, 2001. The amount of damages sought by these lawsuits has not
yet been specified.
The actions have been consolidated in the United States District Court, Southern District of
New York. Alcatel filed a motion to dismiss this action on January 31, 2003 and a decision on the
motion was rendered on March 4, 2005. The judge rejected a certain number of the plaintiffs
demands with prejudice. He also rejected all the remaining claims under the
F-35
federal securities laws for lack of specificity in the pleadings, but with leave to file a
further amended complaint. This was filed, and fully briefed as of August 5, 2005. The parties
are now waiting for the judges decision.
Costa Rica
Beginning in early October 2004, Alcatel learned that investigations had been launched in
Costa Rica by the Costa Rican Prosecutors Office and the National Congress, regarding payments
alleged to have been made by a consultant on behalf of an Alcatel subsidiary to various state and
local officials in Costa Rica, two political parties in Costa Rica and representatives of ICE, the
state-owned telephone company, in connection with the procurement by the Alcatel subsidiary of
several contracts for network equipment and services from ICE. Upon learning of these allegations,
Alcatel immediately commenced and is continuing an investigation into this matter.
In Costa Rica and other countries, Alcatel retains consultants to assist it with its local
operations and contracts. Alcatels contracts with persons through whom Alcatel deals locally
strictly prohibit the provision of any pecuniary or other advantage in contravention of applicable
laws. In addition, Alcatel has a strict Statement of Business Practice (a copy of which is
available on its web site, www.alcatel.com, under the heading Sustainable Development Values and
Charters) that imposes the highest standards of legal and ethical conduct on its employees.
Alcatel rigorously enforces this Statement of Business Practice across the entire company and, when
violations occur, Alcatel takes prompt and appropriate action against the persons involved.
Alcatel has terminated the employment of the president of Alcatel de Costa Rica and a vice
president-Latin America of a French subsidiary. Alcatel is also in the process of pursuing
criminal actions against the former president of Alcatel de Costa Rica, the local consultants and
the employee of the French subsidiary based on its suspicion of their complicity in an improper
payment scheme and misappropriation of funds. The contracts with the local consultants were
limited to the specific projects involved and are no longer in effect or have been terminated, and
any payments due under those contracts have been suspended. Alcatels internal investigation is
continuing.
Alcatel contacted the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States
Department of Justice and informed them that Alcatel will cooperate fully in any inquiry or
investigation into these matters. The SEC is conducting an inquiry into payments by Alcatel in
foreign countries. If the Department of Justice or the SEC determines that violations of law have
occurred, it could seek civil or, in the case of the Department of Justice, criminal sanctions,
including monetary penalties against Alcatel. Neither the Department of Justice nor the SEC has
informed Alcatel what action, if any, they will take.
Several investigations have been launched in Costa Rica concerning this matter by both the
Costa Rican Prosecutors Office and the Costa Rican National Congress. On November 25, 2004, the
Costa Rican Attorney Generals Office commenced a civil lawsuit against Alcatel CIT to seek
compensation for the pecuniary damage caused by the alleged payments described above to the people
and the Treasury of Costa Rica, and for the loss of prestige suffered by the Nation of Costa Rica.
On February 1, 2005, ICE commenced a lawsuit against Alcatel CIT to seek compensation for the
pecuniary damage caused by the alleged payments described above to ICE and its customers, and for
the harm to the reputation of ICE resulting from these events. On August 31, 2006, the Costa Rican
Attorney Generals Office filed an amended claim seeking compensation in the amount of $17.8
million for pecuniary damage caused generally to the Costa Rican people daño social). Such amount
is claimed on a provisional and prudential basis, and it may therefore be modified in the future.
The amount of damages sought by the lawsuit filed by ICE has not yet been specified. Alcatel
intends to defend these actions vigorously and deny any liability or wrongdoing with respect to
these litigations.
Alcatel is unable to predict the outcome of these investigations and civil lawsuit and their
effect on its business. If the Costa Rican authorities conclude criminal violations have occurred,
Alcatel may be banned from participating in government procurement contracts within Costa Rica for
a certain period and fines or penalties may be imposed on Alcatel, in an amount which Alcatel is
not able to determine at this time. Alcatel expects to generate approximately 7.9 million in
revenue from Costa Rican contracts in 2006. Based on the amount of revenue expected from these
contracts, Alcatel does not believe a loss of business in Costa Rica would have a material adverse
effect on Alcatel as whole. However, these events may have a negative impact on the image of
Alcatel in Latin America.
Taiwan
Certain employees of Taisel, a Taiwanese subsidiary of Alcatel, and Siemens Taiwan, along with
a few suppliers and a legislative aide, have been the subject of an investigation by the Taipei
Investigators Office of the Ministry of Justice relating to an axle counter supply contract
awarded to Taisel by Taiwan Railways in 2003. It has been alleged that persons in Taisel and
Siemens Taiwan and subcontractors hired by them were involved in a bid rigging and illicit payment
arrangement for the Taiwan Railways contract.
Upon learning of these allegations, Alcatel immediately commenced and is continuing an
investigation into this matter. Alcatel terminated the former president of Taisel. A director of
international sales and marketing development of a German subsidiary who was involved in the Taiwan
Railways contract has resigned.
F-36
On February 21, 2005, the former president of Taisel, Taisel and others were indicted for
violation of the Taiwanese Government Procurement Act.
On November 15, 2005, the Taipei criminal district court found Taisel not guilty of the
alleged violation of the Government Procurement Act. The former President of Taisel was not judged
because he was not present or represented at the proceedings. The court found two Taiwanese
businessmen involved in the matter guilty of violations of the Business Accounting Act.
The prosecutor has filed an appeal with the Taipei court of appeal. Should the higher court
find Taisel guilty of the bid-rigging allegations in the indictment, Taisel may be banned from
participating in government procurement contracts within Taiwan for a certain period and fines or
penalties may be imposed on Alcatel, in an amount not to exceed 25,000.
Other allegations made in connection with this matter may still be under ongoing investigation
by the Taiwanese authorities.
As a group, Alcatel expects to generate approximately 131.1 million of revenue from Taiwanese
contracts in 2006, of which only a part will be from governmental contracts. Based on the amount
of revenue expected from these contracts, Alcatel does not believe a loss of business in Taiwan
would have a material adverse effect on Alcatel as a whole.
Effect of the investigations.
Alcatel reiterates that its policy is to conduct its business with transparency, and in
compliance with all laws and regulations, both locally and internationally. Alcatel will fully
cooperate with all governmental authorities in connection with the investigation of any violation
of those laws and regulations.
Although it is not possible at this stage of these cases to predict the outcome with any
degree of certainty, Alcatel believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have
a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or its income (loss) from
operating activities. Alcatel is not aware of any other exceptional circumstances or proceedings
that have had or may have a significant impact on the business, the financial position, the net
income (loss) or the assets of Alcatel or the Group.
Note 20 Summary of differences between accounting principles followed by Alcatel and U.S. GAAP
Alcatels accounts are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRSs) as adopted by the EU (see note 1) which differ in certain respects from generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Differences that existed between
generally accepted according principles in France (French GAAP), which was used before IFRS, will
continue to exist in certain areas as a result of the transitional provisions applied under IFRS 1
even though an IFRS accounting policy may be the same, or similar, to that applied under US GAAP.
Those differences which have a significant effect on the Groups profit for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and equity as of that date are as follows:
(a) Differences in accounting for business combinations
Adoption of French pooling of interests accounting method for stock-for-stock business
combinations under French GAAP that were not restated in the opening IFRS balance sheet (as of
January 1, 2004)
From January 1, 1999, in connection with the change in French accounting principles, Alcatel
accounted for its acquisition of DSC Communications Corporation (DSC) under the French pooling of
interests accounting method: assets and liabilities of DSC Communications Corporation were
accounted for on a carryover basis at the acquisition date, adjusted to Alcatels accounting
method. The difference resulting from the application of the pooling of interests accounting method
remained in shareholders equity.
The two stock-for-stock acquisitions made during the first half of 2000, Genesys
Telecommunications Laboratories (Genesys) and Newbridge Networks Corporation (Newbridge), the
stock-for-stock acquisition of Kymata made during the second half of 2001, the stock-for-stock
acquisition of Astral Point and Telera made during 2002 and the stock-for-stock acquisition of
TiMetra made during 2003 have been accounted for using the pooling of interests accounting method
under French GAAP.
F-37
Under IFRS, these business combinations have not been restated to conform with IFRS 3
Business combinations (IFRS 3) requirements, as permitted by the exemption authorized by IFRS 1
§ 13(a)) that we elected.
Under U.S. GAAP, the DSC, Genesys, Newbridge, Kymata, Astral Point and Telera acquisitions
have been recorded under the purchase accounting method. TiMetra being a development stage-company
when acquired, the difference between the fair value of net assets acquired and the purchase price
was accounted for in operating expenses.
The purchase prices were mainly allocated to acquired technology, in-process research and
development, fair value of investments, deferred compensation and deferred tax liabilities
resulting in goodwill of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition |
|
Currency |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(in millions) |
DSC |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
2,613 |
|
Genesys |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
1,471 |
|
Newbridge |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
CAD |
|
|
6,968 |
|
Kymata |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
GBP |
|
|
57 |
|
Astral Point |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
138 |
|
Telera |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
47 |
|
TiMetra |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
114 |
(a) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As TiMetra did not meet the definition of a business as defined by EITF Issue No.98-3
Determining Whether a Non-Monetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive Assets or of
a Business, an amount of $114 million, representing the excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, was accounted
for directly in the income statements as a loss. The fair value of the identifiable assets
acquired was based upon an appraisal made by an external expert. |
As part of the changeover to IFRS on and after January 1, 2005, the French pooling of
interest method of accounting for business combinations occurring in 2004 has been abandoned on
and after January 1, 2004 by the Group (see note 1c).
Intangible assets and impairment
In connection with the acquisitions described above, the Group allocated part of the purchase
prices to acquired technologies. The amounts recorded at the acquisition dates were: USD 256
million for DSC, USD 59 million for Genesys, CAD 694 million for Newbridge, GBP 10 million for
Kymata, USD 8 million for Astral Point, USD 27 million for Telera and USD 40 million for TiMetra.
Those intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful life (three to seven years) and
are tested for impairment in compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No.144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
Allocation of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects related to
business combinations accounted for using the French pooling of interests method and not
restated in the IFRS opening balance sheet
DSC
In connection with the acquisition of DSC, the Group allocated USD 1,096 million of the
purchase price to in-process research and development projects. At the acquisition date, DSC was
conducting design, development, engineering and testing activities associated with the completion
of hundreds of projects aimed at developing next-generation technologies that were expected to
address emerging market demands for the telecommunication equipment market. The allocation of USD
1,096 million of the purchase price to these in-process research and development projects
represented their estimated fair values. More specifically, the development, engineering and
testing activities associated with the following technologies were allocated as portions of the
purchase price: Access (USD 600 million), Switching (USD 400 million), and Transmission (USD 100
million).
Newbridge
In connection with the acquisition of Newbridge, the Group allocated USD 750 million of the
purchase price to in-process research and development projects.
At the acquisition date, Newbridge was conducting design, development, engineering and testing
activities associated with the completion of numerous projects aimed at developing next-generation
technologies that were expected to address emerging market demands for the telecommunication
equipment market. The allocation of USD 750 million of the purchase price to these in-process
research and development projects represented their estimated fair value. More specifically, the
development, engineering and testing activities associated with the following technologies were
allocated portions of the purchase price: Switching and Routing (USD 505 million) and Access (USD
245 million).
F-38
Genesys
At the acquisition date, Genesys was conducting design, development, engineering and testing
activities associated with the completion of several projects related to Genesys release 6. The
allocation of USD 100 million of the purchase price to the in-process research and development
projects represented their estimated fair values.
TiMetra
At the acquisition date, TiMetra was developing routers to handle data traffic at what is
known as the network edge, the part of the data network that links offices, homes and other
buildings to the long distance core network. In June 2003, TiMetra introduced its first product,
for next generation carrier networks, designed to fit multiple applications. The allocation of USD
5.5 million of the purchase price to the in-process research and development projects represented
their estimated fair values using the methodology described above.
Approximately USD 42 million had been spent on research and development projects as of the
valuation date. Costs to complete the projects were estimated at approximately USD 9 million over
24 months following the acquisition. Management estimated that the aforementioned projects were in
various stages of development and were approximately 80% complete, in the aggregate, based on
development costs.
Estimated total revenues from the acquired in-process technology were expected to peak in 2006
and 2007 and steadily decline thereafter as other new products and technologies were expected to be
introduced by Alcatel.
The estimated costs of good sold as well as operating expenses as a percentage of revenues for
TiMetra were expected to be materially consistent with historical levels, primarily due to the
extremely competitive nature of the industry and the need to continue to spend heavily on research
and development.
A discount rate of 35% was used for determining the value of the in-process research and
development. This rate is higher than the implied weighted average cost of capital for the
acquisition due to inherent uncertainties surrounding the successful development of the purchased
in-process technology, the useful life of such technology, the profitability levels of such
technology, and the uncertainty of technological advances that were unknown at that time.
Allocation of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects related to
business combinations accounted for using the purchase method
As part of the changeover to IFRS on and after January 1, 2005, the French pooling of
interest method of accounting for business combinations occurring in 2004 has been abandoned on
and after January 1, 2004 by the Group. All business combination from January 1, 2004 onwards are
accounted for using the purchase method.
Development expenditures that relates to an in-process research or development project
(IPR&D) acquired in a business combination is recognized as an intangible asset separate from
goodwill under IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
Under U.S. GAAP (FASB Interpretation N°4), at the date the combination is consummated, all
costs assigned to activities to be used in research and development are charged to expense unless
the assets have alternative future uses. Therefore IPR&D identified in a business combination and
accounted for as intangible assets apart from goodwill are fully amortized once the business
combination is consummated.
On the other hand, under IFRS, expenditures related to IPR&D accounted for as asset in a
business combination are considered indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the
associated research and development efforts, at which point the useful life of this asset will be
determined and the amortization will begin or the impairment booked.
The main IPR&D concerned are related to the following business combinations : Spatial Wireless
in 2004, Native Networks in 2005 and 2Wire in 2006.
Spatial
At the acquisition time, Spatial Wireless was developing a UMTS (Universal Mobile
Telecommunications System) project qualified as in-process research and development project. This
UMTS project, represents a major engineering effort to integrate UMTS and support for Wi-Fi handset
access into the Alcatels wireless Softswitch technology. The allocation of USD 10 million of the
purchase price to the in-process research and development projects was estimated at USD 10 million
at the end of 2004 and USD 14.5 million in 2005.
Approximately USD 4 million had been spent since June 2003 on this in-process research and
development project as of the acquisition date. Management estimated that the aforementioned
project was approximately 80% complete, therefore, costs to complete the project were estimated at
approximately USD 1 million over 5 months following the acquisition.
F-39
Estimated total revenues from the acquired in-process technology were expected to peak in 2006
to 2010 and steadily decline thereafter as other new products and technologies were expected to be
introduced by Alcatel.
The estimated costs of good sold as well as operating expenses as a percentage of revenues for
Spatial were expected to be materially consistent with historical levels, primarily due to the
extremely competitive nature of the industry and the need to continue to spend heavily on research
and development.
A discount rate of 30% was used for determining the value of the in-process research and
development. This rate is higher than the implied weighted average cost of capital for the
acquisition due to inherent uncertainties surrounding the successful development of the purchased
in-process technology, the lifetime of such technology, the profitability levels of such
technology, and the likelihood of technological evolutions unknown at that time.
Contribution of Space businesses by Alcatel to two jointly controlled joint ventures
On July 1, 2005, Alcatel and Finmeccanica announced the creation of two joint ventures that
had been described in a memorandum of understanding signed by the parties on June 24, 2004: Alcatel
Alenia Space (Alcatel holds 67 % and Finmeccanica 33%) and Telespazio Holding (Finmeccanica holds
67 % and Alcatel 33%). For more detail on the transaction refer to note 3 of the consolidated
financial statements. These joint ventures are jointly controlled, as defined by IAS 31 Joint
Ventures and are therefore consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method starting July
1, 2005.
Concerning the accounting treatment of the capital gain resulting from the disposal of the
contributed net assets to the newly formed joint ventures, in accordance with the guidance provided
by SIC 13 Jointly Controlled Entities Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers, the recognition
of any portion of a gain or loss from the transaction shall reflect the substance of the
transaction. While the assets are retained by the joint venture, and provided the venturer has
transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership, the venturer shall recognise only that
portion of the gain or loss that is attributable to the interests of the other venturers. Therefore
a gain related to the contributed business has been accounted for representing 129 million as of
December 31, 2005.
Concerning the accounting treatment of the gain on disposal related to the contributed assets,
under U.S. GAAP it is considered that contributing assets to a joint venture is not the culmination
of the earnings process. However, as indicated in AICPA Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for
Investments in Real Estate Ventures, when cash is paid to one of the joint venturers in order to
balance the fair market value of assets contributed by each venturer, gain recognition is allowed,
but limited to the lesser of the computed gain and the amount of cash received, provided the
recipient has no refund or continuing support obligation.
As no balancing cash amount has been received in the contribution of Alcatels assets to the
Telespazio Holding, no gain has been accounted for under U.S. GAAP. On the other hand, gain on
disposal related to contributed assets differs under U.S. GAAP from the gain accounted for under
IFRS, due to differences between the net book value of the contributed assets under both standards,
mainly related to the amortization of goodwill (see note 20b) or accounting treatment of pensions
(see note 20f). Therefore the gain related to the contributed business that has been accounted for
under U.S. GAAP in 2005 amounts to 72.
(b) Amortization and impairment of goodwill
Under French GAAP, goodwill was generally amortized over its estimated life, not to exceed 20
years.
As business combinations consummated before January 1, 2004 were not restated in the opening
IFRS balance sheet, accumulated amortization of goodwill as of December 31, 2004 accounted for in
accordance with French GAAP was maintained in the IFRS consolidated financial statements.
From January 1, 2004 goodwill (including goodwill on equity method investments) are no more
amortized under IFRS but annually impairment tested as prescribed by IFRS 3.
Beginning January 1, 2002, for the purpose of preparing the U.S. GAAP reconciliation, Alcatel
adopted SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). Goodwill is no longer
amortized but rather tested for impairment at the adoption date and on an annual basis or whenever
indicators of impairment arise. The goodwill impairment test, which is based on fair value, is
performed at the reporting unit level (one level below the operating segment). In the first step,
the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its book value, including goodwill. If the fair
value of the reporting unit is less than its book value, a second step is performed which compares
the implied value of the reporting units goodwill to the carrying value of its goodwill. The
implied value of the goodwill is determined based upon the difference between the fair value of the
division and the net of the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the reporting
unit. If the implied value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value, the difference is
recorded as an impairment. During 2002, material impairment losses have been accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 142 requirements. These impairments losses
F-40
were related to some of the business combinations accounted for using French pooling of
interests method described in note 20a above.
Under IFRS, goodwill is allocated to cash generating units (defined as the smallest group of
identifiable assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use largely independent of the cash
inflows from other assets) or groups of cash generating units, which represent the lowest level
within the entity at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. In Alcatel
this level is similar to the reporting unit level as defined by SFAS 142. If the recoverable amount
of the group of cash generating units (including goodwill) is lower than its carrying amount, an
impairment loss shall be accounted for to reduce the carrying amount of the assets of the group of
units to the recoverable amount, first in reducing the carrying amount of goodwill and then in
reducing the carrying amounts of other assets.
The impairment losses accounted for under U.S. GAAP mainly in 2002 were not accounted for
under IFRS, these impairment losses being related to business combinations in which no goodwill had
been recorded under IFRS as indicated in note 20a.
Additionally, goodwill on equity method investments is no longer amortized. However, it is
still to be tested for impairment in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock (APB 18) .
Amortization charges of goodwill for fiscal year 2002 and 2003 accounted for in our IFRS
consolidated financial statements are therefore restated in our U.S. GAAP consolidated financial
statements and specific U.S. GAAP impairment losses have been accounted for related to business
combinations recorded under French pooling of interest methods that were not restated under IFRS.
(c) Capitalization of development costs related to Research and Development efforts
Under IFRS -IAS 38 Intangible assets (IAS 38) expenses related to development phase of a
research and development project shall be capitalized if certain criteria are met :
technical feasibility of completing the project so that it will be available for use or sale,
intention to complete the project,
ability to use or sell the intangible asset arising from the project,
capacity to generate probable future economic benefits,
availability of adequate resources to complete the development, and
ability to measure the expenditures attributable to the project).
Under U.S. GAAP, software development costs would be similarly capitalized in accordance with
SFAS No. 86 Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise
Marketed. However, in accordance with SFAS No 2 Accounting for Research and Development Costs
non-software development costs shall be charged to expense when incurred.
(d) |
|
Liability recognition for certain employee termination benefits and other costs associated to
restructuring plans such as anticipated termination of leases |
The main difference between IFRS and U.S. GAAP relates to voluntary termination benefits.
Under IAS 19 Employee benefits (IAS 19), benefits are recognized when the entity is
demonstrably committed to providing those benefits. This definition differs from the requirements
of SFAS N° 88 Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension
Plans and for Termination Benefits, the liability is recognized when incurred (when the employee
accepts the entitys offer of voluntary termination of employment).
Another difference is related to the accounting method for onerous contracts. Under IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (IAS 37) an onerous contract is a
contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting its obligations exceed the economic benefits
expected. We recognize the provisions as soon as it is determined that the costs will exceed the
expected economic benefits. In the specific case of onerous operating lease the provision could be
recognized before we cease to use the asset concerned. Under SFAS 146, a liability for a cost to
terminate a contract before the end of its term shall be recognized at fair value when the entity
terminates the contract. If the contract is an operating lease the fair value of the liability
shall be accounted for at the cease-use date.
(e) Other comprehensive income
SFAS No. 130 Other Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130) requires retroactive reporting of
comprehensive income and its components, displayed as prominently as other financial statements.
Comprehensive income may be defined for U.S. GAAP purposes as the change in equity of a business
enterprise from transactions and other events and circumstances
from non-owner sources. IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) does not
require the same disclosures as SFAS 130. For instance IAS 1 does not require display or disclosure
of the accumulated balances for individual items reported directly in equity.
F-41
(f) Pension and post-retirement benefits other than pension plans
Under U.S. GAAP, when the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation (being the actuarial present
value of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee service rendered prior to
that date and based on current and past compensation levels) minus the fair value of plan assets
exceeds the liability, an additional liability must be recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 87
Employers Accounting for Pensions. If this additional liability exceeds the unrecognized prior
service cost, the excess is recorded as a reduction of shareholders equity. Under IFRS (IAS 19),
there is no such requirement.
To comply with U.S. GAAP, the Group applies the SFAS No. 106 Employers Accounting for
Post-retirement Benefits other than Pensions. These post-retirement benefits, primarily life
insurance and health care, cover certain of Alcatels U.S. Group retirees.
Starting January 1, 2004, Alcatel comply with IAS 19 (Employee Benefits). The actuarial gains
and losses linked to experience adjustments and to the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions
that were recorded at January 1, 2004, have been recorded in shareholders equity (see note 1k).
Under U.S. GAAP those actuarial gains and losses will be recognized over the expected average
remaining working lives of the employees.
(g) Share-based payment
Accounting for stock option plans under IFRS Share-Based Payment (IFRS 2) leads to
recognition of a compensation expense. Equity-settled share based payment such as stock options
plans are measured at fair value. Fair value is determined at the date of grant using an
appropriate evaluation model (see note 1w and note 6). Only options issued after November 7, 2002
and not fully vested at January 1, 2005 are accounted for using IFRS principles. Other stock
options does not lead to recognition of a compensation expense.
Under U.S. GAAP, until January 1, 2006, Alcatel accounted for those plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting For Stock Issued To
Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations. Stock-based employee compensation cost was
reflected in net income based on the intrinsic value of the stock options granted.
Effective January 1, 2006, Alcatel adopted SFAS No 123(R), Share Based Payment. Alcatel
elected the modified prospective transition method, therefore, prior results were not restated.
Under this method, SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled after the required effective date (i.e. January 1, 2006 for Alcatel).
Awards that were unvested as of the date of adoption of this standard, have to be amortized as
the respective service was rendered, and the cost of such awards continued to be based on the grant
date fair value as measured previously for the SFAS 123 disclosure requirements.
(h) Leases and sale-leaseback transactions
SFAS 13 Accounting for leases (SFAS 13) requires that in a sale-leaseback transaction with
a lease classified as an operating lease, any profit or loss on the sale shall be deferred and
amortized in proportion to the rental payments over the period of time that the asset is expected
to be used. Under IAS 17 Leases, the profit corresponding to the disposal of the asset is not
deferred if the transaction was made with a selling price and rental payments that correspond to
the market conditions at the time of the transaction.
IAS 17 Leases and SFAS 13 prescribe similar lease accounting approaches based on whether a
lease transfers substantially all of the risks and rewards related to ownership of the leased
asset. However, SFAS 13 provide quantitative criteria to determine if a lease is an operating lease
or a capital lease where IAS 17 requires subjective determinations to be made. It could lead in
certain rare circumstances to consider a lease as operating lease under U.S. GAAP and as finance
lease under IAS 17 and vice versa.
(i) Compound financial instruments
If a financial instrument contains both a liability and an equity component, such components
shall be classified separately as financial liabilities or equity instruments under IAS 32
Financial Instruments : Disclosure and Presentation (IAS 32).
This is the case with the bonds issued by the Group in 2003 (Oceane Obligation Convertible
ou Echangeable en Actions Nouvelles ou Existantes, bonds convertible into or exchanged for new or
existing shares) and 2002 (Orane Obligation Remboursable en Actions Nouvelles ou Existantes, bonds mandatorily redeemable for
new or existing shares) (see note 1m).There is no debt component booked for the Orane bonds since
all interest was pre-paid at the issuance date. The Orane bonds were entirely redeemed on December
23, 2005 against the issuance of new shares.
F-42
These requirements differ from those of U.S. GAAP . The Orane (notes mandatorily redeemable
for shares) were presented on a specific balance sheet line item in the U.S. GAAP classified
balance sheet as part of non-current liabilities and the Oceane (bonds convertible into or
exchanged for new or existing shares) are accounted for as financial debt and presented as long
term financial debt in the U.S. GAAP classified balance sheet (see note 22(4)).
(j) Reversal of inventory write-down
Under IAS 2 Inventories (IAS 2), inventories are written-down if cost becomes higher than
net realizable value. An assessment of the net realizable value is made at each reporting period.
When there is clear evidence of an increase of the net realizable value because of changes in
economic circumstances, the amount of the write-down is reversed even if the inventories remain
unsold.
Under U.S. GAAP, ARB N° 43 Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins states
that following a write-down such reduced amount is to be considered the cost for subsequent
accounting purposes and it is therefore not permitted to reverse a former write-down before the
inventory is either sold or written-off.
(k) Presentation of consolidated financial statements
The classification of certain items in, and the format of, Alcatels consolidated financial
statements vary to some extent from U.S. GAAP.
The most significant reporting and presentation practices followed by Alcatel that differ from
U.S. GAAP are described in the following paragraphs:
In its balance sheet, Alcatel reports the costs incurred plus recognized profits less the sum
of recognized losses and progress billings for all construction contracts in progress either in the
specific balance sheet line item amount due from customers or in the specific line item amounts
due to customers depending if the amounts determined contract by contract are respectively
positive or negative as required by IAS 11 Construction Contracts (IAS 11). These specific
balance sheet line items does not exist under U.S. GAAP and the corresponding amounts are presented
in inventories, trade receivables and related accounts, or other reserves depending upon their
nature.
Deferred taxes are presented in non-current assets and liabilities under IFRS and as current
or non-current under U.S. GAAP based on the classification for financial reporting of the related
tax asset or liability.
Under IFRS (IAS 1), the income statement is presented using a classification based on the
function of expenses. Nevertheless, when an item of income and expense is material, the nature and
amount shall be disclosed separately. Expenses presented on specific line item of the income
statement due to their materiality are restructuring costs, impairment of intangible assets,
share-based payment and gain on sale of stock in subsidiaries. Income statements line item
presented could therefore differ between the two standards.
In its statement of cash flows under IFRS, Alcatel presents the items net cash provided
(used) by operating activities before changes in working capital, interest and taxes, this item
would not be shown under a U.S. GAAP statement of cash flows presentation.
(l) Cumulative translation adjustment
Due to the election made to reset the cumulative translation adjustment as of January 1, 2004
to zero, as permitted by IFRS 1 (see comments given in note 1d), Alcatel created a permanent
reconciling item for U.S. GAAP purposes.
(m) Effect of cumulative translation adjustments on sale of subsidiaries
We elected to reset the cumulative translation adjustments to zero as of transition date to
IFRS (January 1, 2004), as discussed in Note 1(d) to our consolidated financial statements. As a
result, we created a permanent reconciling item between IFRS and U.S. GAAP. A portion of this
reconciling item is reversed each time we dispose of a consolidated subsidiary, the financial
statements of which were denominated in a currency other than our reporting currency, the euro, and
for which the cumulative translation adjustment as of January 1, 2004 was something other than zero
under U.S. GAAP.
(n) Adjustments on equity affiliates
The most significant portion of this adjustment is related to the share in net assets of
Thales, which is accounted for under the equity method. The difference primarily arose from the following:
Our adoption of FASB Statement No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, which required us to cease
the amortization of
F-43
goodwill (including goodwill related to equity affiliates) for U.S. GAAP
purposes. Effective upon our transition to IFRS (January 1, 2004), we discontinued amortization of
goodwill in accordance with IFRS 3; however, we adopted the IFRS 1 transitional provisions on a
prospective basis. This difference in the adoption dates between the two standards has created a
reconciling item which is presented as adjustments on equity affiliates as it relates to Share
in net assets of equity affiliates balance sheet line item.
Thales, a French public company, also adopted IFRS effective January 1, 2004. The primary
reconciling item between French GAAP and IFRS resulted from the election of the option to record
accumulated unrecognized actuarial gains and losses relating to pensions at the transition date in
shareholders equity pursuant to IFRS 1. As a result, an adjustment has been recorded to cancel the
effect of these IFRS transitional provisions in arriving at U.S. GAAP net income.
(o) Accounting for income taxes
Under IFRS, according to IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting, there is no distinction between
current year income and future income and therefore IAS 34 permits changes to the recognition of
deferred tax assets to be included in the effective annual rate if there is a change of
circumstance occurring during the interim period and the criteria for the recognition of the
deferred tax asset are met as of the interim reporting date.
Under U.S. GAAP (under SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, APB Opinion No. 28 Interim
Financial Reporting and FIN 18 Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods), the tax effect
of a change in a valuation allowance required at prior year end on any deferred tax asset must be
split between amounts being recognized as a result of taxable amounts arising in the current year,
versus amounts recognized as a result of the reassessment of taxable amounts arising in future
years. Any movement in valuation allowance pertaining to current year temporary differences
originating or a valuation allowance reversing for use against current year income should be
included in the forecasted effective annual rate. In the case of a change in judgment regarding
realization of a deferred tax asset to be utilized in future years, the effect is recognized as a
discrete item in the interim period in which the change of judgment due to a change in circumstance
occurs. Additionally, any increase or decrease in valuation allowance due to deductible temporary
differences and carryforwards arising from significant, unusual, or infrequently occurring items,
discontinued operations, or caused by prior year provision to return adjustments should also be
accounted for on a discrete basis in the interim period.
Note
21
Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP
The following is a summary of the estimated adjustments to the unaudited condensed interim
consolidated income statements for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 and
shareholders equity at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, which would be required if U.S. GAAP
had been applied instead of IFRS.
(1) Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2006 (a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
Net income (loss) attributable to the equity holders of the parent
according to IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Business combinations and amortization of goodwill |
|
|
20 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Capitalization of development costs |
|
|
20 |
(c) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Restructuring plans |
|
|
20 |
(d) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Sale and lease back transactions |
|
|
20 |
(h) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Compound financial instruments |
|
|
20 |
(i) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Share based payments |
|
|
20 |
(g) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits |
|
|
20 |
(f) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Effect of cumulative translation adjustments on sale of subsidiaries |
|
|
20 |
(m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reversal of inventory write-downs |
|
|
20 |
(j) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Adjustments on equity affiliates |
|
|
20 |
(n) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounting for income taxes |
|
|
20 |
(o) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Tax effect of the above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1= $1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
F-44
(2) Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2006 (a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Shareholders equity attributable to the equity
holders of the parent according to IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,161 |
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
Business combinations and amortization of goodwill |
|
|
20 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
3,969 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
Capitalization of development costs |
|
|
20 |
(c) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
Restructuring plans |
|
|
20 |
(d) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Sale and lease back transactions |
|
|
20 |
(h) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
Compound financial instruments |
|
|
20 |
(i) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Pension and post-retirement benefits |
|
|
20 |
(f) |
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
Reversal of inventory write-downs |
|
|
20 |
(j) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Adjustments on equity affiliates |
|
|
20 |
(n) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Accounting for income taxes |
|
|
20 |
(o) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Tax effect of the above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,141 |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from euros () into U.S. Dollars ($) has been made merely for
the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1= $1.2779 on June
30, 2006. |
Note 22
Summarized U.S. GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Summarized U.S. GAAP Consolidated Income Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006(a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
8,233 |
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5,418 |
) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
Administrative and selling expenses |
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
Research and development costs |
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
Purchased in-process R&D |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
Amortization and impairment of goodwill and other operating
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on notes mandatorily redeemable for shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Other interest expense |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Interest income and other financial income, net |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of stock in subsidiaries |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share in net income of equity affiliates |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Provision for income tax |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from into $ has been made merely for the convenience of the
reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
(2) Earnings per share under U.S. GAAP:
Earnings per share presented below are calculated in accordance with SFAS 128 Earnings per
Share. The number of shares to be issued upon conversion of notes mandatorily redeemable for new
or existing shares (ORANE) is excluded of the calculation of basic earnings per share.
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006(a) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of adoption of
new standards
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
0.20
|
|
0.16 |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
0.20
|
|
0.16 |
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of adoption of
new accounting standards
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
0.20
|
|
0.15 |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
0.20
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from into $ has been made merely for the convenience of the
reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
The following tables present a reconciliation of the basic earnings per share and diluted
earnings per share for each period disclosed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Per share |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
1,371,360,733 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,735,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
1,381,095,842 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of stock options not exercised as of June 30, 2006 amounted to 142,674,291 shares.
Only 9,735,109 share equivalents have been taken into account for the calculation of the diluted
earnings per share, as the remaining share equivalents had an anti-dilutive effect..
Furthermore, 63,192,019 new or existing Alcatel ordinary shares, which are issuable in respect
of Alcatels convertible bonds (OCEANE) issued on June 12, 2003, have not been taken into account
in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share amount due to their anti-dilutive effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Per share |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
shares |
|
|
amount |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,246,305,764 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
Stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,393,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes mandatorily redeemable for shares
(ORANE) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
120,779,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
1,376,478,805 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of stock options not exercised as of June 30, 2005 amounted to 154,549,981 shares.
Only 9,393,832 share equivalents have been taken into account for the calculation of the diluted
earnings per share, as the remaining share equivalents had an anti-dilutive effect.
Furthermore, 63,192,019 new or existing Alcatel ordinary shares, which are issuable in respect
of Alcatels convertible bonds (OCEANE) issued on June 12, 2003, have not been taken into account
in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share amount due to their anti-dilutive effect.
(3) Statement of comprehensive income
Under U.S. GAAP, the following information would be set forth in the consolidated financial
statements for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 as either a separate statement or as a
component of the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders equity and minority interests.
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006(a) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income (loss) under U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Cash flow hedge |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Tax effect on the above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) according to U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Translation of amounts from into $ has been made merely for the convenience of the
reader at the Noon Buying Rate of 1 = $1.2779 on June 30, 2006. |
If Alcatel were to present consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the
accumulated balances for minimum pension liability adjustments, foreign currency translation
adjustments, unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedge would
be disclosed either on the face of the consolidated balance sheets, in the statements of changes in
shareholders equity and minority interests, or in the notes to the financial statements. The
following table presents the accumulated balances, net of tax, of each of these classifications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
Foreign |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
pension |
|
currency |
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
liability |
|
translation |
|
(losses) on |
|
Cash flow |
|
|
adjustments |
|
adjustments |
|
securities |
|
Hedge |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Six months period change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months period change |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
(4) Classified balance sheet as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
Marketable securities, net |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Other debtors |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
Trade receivables and related accounts |
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
11,719 |
|
|
|
12,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments & other non current assets, net |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Share in net assets of equity affiliates |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and other non-current assets |
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
4,382 |
|
|
|
4,636 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
(3,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition goodwill, net |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
7,024 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
7,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
11,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
23,284 |
|
|
|
24,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
Trade payables and related accounts |
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
Accrued contract costs & other accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
Customers deposits and advances |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
Short-term financial debt |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued activities or to
a disposal group held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
8,787 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term financial debt |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
Bonds and notes issued, long-term |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term financial debt |
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other reserves |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Accrued pensions and retirement obligations |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
5,306 |
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTERESTS |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
21,638 |
|
|
|
21,594 |
|
Retained earnings, fair value and other reserves |
|
|
(13,273 |
) |
|
|
(13,558 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) and cash flow hedge |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
Less treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
23,284 |
|
|
|
24,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
(5) Statement of changes in shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimun |
|
Unrealized |
|
Cash |
|
Cumulative |
|
Treasury |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
liability |
|
holding |
|
flow |
|
translation |
|
stock at |
|
income |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
stock |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
adjustment |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
hedge |
|
adjustment |
|
cost |
|
(loss) |
|
equity |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Balance at December
31, 2005 before
appropriation |
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
21,594 |
|
|
|
(13,057 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Net change in
treasury stock
Ordinary shares owned
by consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net changes in cash
flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Net changes in
unrealized holding
gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Minimum liability
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
Other changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Balance at June 30,
2006 before
appropriation |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
21,638 |
|
|
|
(13,053 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed
appropriation of net
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30,
2006 after
appropriation |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
21,638 |
|
|
|
13,282 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 23
Specific U.S. GAAP disclosures
(1) Impairment of goodwill (SFAS 142)
The changes during the first six months of 2006 in the carrying value of goodwill per segment
are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
Mobile |
|
Private |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications |
|
Communications |
|
Communications |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Balance as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7,024 |
|
Goodwill acquired during year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment and others |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets acquired
Entities acquired during the first six months of 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Acquired technology and in process research and development |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alcatel Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
(889 |
) |
Acquired technology and research |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
Other (a) |
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets (b) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Mainly software development costs. |
|
(b) |
|
Intangible assets related to the application of SFAS 87. |
F-49
The amortization expense for the first six months of 2006 was 118 million. Amortization
expense of intangible assets is expected to be 125 million in the second half of 2006, 240
million in 2007, 178 million in 2008, 107 million in 2009, 20 million in 2010 and 16
million in 2011.
(2) Stock-based compensation (SFAS 123 and SFAS 148)
The following information is disclosed according to the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 123R Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123R) and are provided as a
supplement to the IFRS disclosures provided in Note 6.
The following table summarizes the classification of stock-based compensation expense under
FAS 123R:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
Cost of sales |
|
|
11 |
|
Administrative and selling expenses |
|
|
14 |
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, 84 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per share |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
149,359,801 |
|
|
|
26.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
17,132,170 |
|
|
|
11.70 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,906,001 |
) |
|
|
5.97 |
|
Forfeited/Expired |
|
|
(21,392,111 |
) |
|
|
29.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
142,674,291 |
|
|
|
24.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which could be exercised |
|
|
91,181,893 |
|
|
|
32.32 |
|
The weighted average remaining term for stock options outstanding and exercisable was 4.4
years and 3.4 years, respectively, as of June 30, 2006. The aggregate intrinsic value for stock
options outstanding and exercisable was 79 million and 43 million, respectively, as of
June 30, 2006.
Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options were 17 million and 8 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 respectively. The intrinsic value
related to the exercise of stock options was 17 million and 9 million of euros during the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 respectively.
Since 2004, the fair value of options at grant date has been determined using a binomial
method (Cox-Ross-Rubinstein model). This allows behavioral factors governing the exercice of stock
options to be taken into consideration and to consider that all options will not be systematically
exercised by the end of the exercice period. The fair values at grant date of options granted
during the years 2003, 2002 and 1999 have been estimated using the Black Scholes model and a
stochastic model for the 2000 and 2001 plans. The following table summarizes assumptions used to
compute faire value of stock option grants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
1999 |
Interest rate |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
%(a) |
Expected life |
|
3-8 years |
|
|
3-8 years |
|
|
3-8 years |
|
|
3-8 years |
|
|
3-8 years |
|
|
3-9 years |
|
|
5-10 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
(c |
) |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
39 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(e |
) |
|
|
(d |
) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
USD rates, concern mainly U.S. plans. |
|
(b) |
|
73% for Alcatel Class O shares, 64% for Class A shares, 51% for ADS. |
|
(c) |
|
50% for Alcatel Class O shares, 46% for Class A shares, 46% for ADS. |
|
(d) |
|
0% in 2004 and 2005, 1% for later years. |
|
(e) |
|
0% in 2005, 1% for later years. |
F-50
The models used to calculate option values were developed to estimate the fair value of
freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly
differ from the Groups stock option awards. These models are very sensitive as to the stock price
volatility assumptions. Accordingly, management believes that these valuation models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Groups stock option awards.
The following table discloses the pro forma net income and earnings per share, as if the fair
value based accounting method had been used to account for share-based compensation cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(In millions of euros |
|
|
except per share |
|
|
data) |
Net income (loss) as reported |
|
|
194 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of tax |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net income (loss) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share as reported |
|
|
0.16 |
|
Basic earnings per share proforma |
|
|
0.09 |
|
Diluted earnings per share as reported |
|
|
0.15 |
|
Diluted earnings per share proforma |
|
|
0.08 |
|
(3) Restructuring (SFAS 146)
Under IFRS, as disclosed in note 1(l) of the unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements, the Group records restructuring reserves when the restructuring programs have been
finalized and approved by the Groups management and have been announced before the balance sheet
date, resulting in an obligating event of the Group to third parties. Differences between
accounting principles followed by Alcatel (i.e. IFRS) and U.S. GAAP concerning restructuring are
disclosed in note 20d of this document.
The impact of this U.S. GAAP adjustment for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
|
December |
|
year |
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments |
|
June 30, |
2006 |
|
31, 2005 |
|
expense |
|
Utilization |
|
and others |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
IFRS reserve |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
Moving costs |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Lease obligations and other direct costs |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Termination costs in excess of legal obligation |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. GAAP adjustment |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP restructuring reserve |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
43 |
* |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which related to plan initiated after
December
31, 2002 (see detail in SFAS 146 disclosure) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Total restructuring costs according to US GAAP were 47 million, of which 4
million consisted in write-offs of fixed assets linked to restructuring plans. |
The current year expense recorded in the first six months of 2006 includes the following
major actions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Termination costs in Germany |
|
|
12 |
|
Termination costs and costs associated with a disposal of facility in Italy |
|
|
6 |
|
Termination costs in Alcatel-CIT (France) |
|
|
4 |
|
Termination costs for Alcatel Business Systems |
|
|
3 |
|
Other plans in the world |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
The reserve at the end of June 2006 is analyzed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
Employee termination benefits |
|
|
185 |
|
Other costs |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining 185 million reserve for employee termination benefits at June 30, 2006
includes 1,742 employees representing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
employees |
Termination costs in Alcatel-CIT (France) |
|
|
438 |
|
Downsizing of Submarine Networks Division |
|
|
107 |
|
Termination costs in Alcatel España S.A. (Spain) |
|
|
49 |
|
Reorganization of Space Division: termination costs mainly in France, Italy and Belgium |
|
|
562 |
|
Termination costs in other European units (UK, Belgium, Portugal, Scandinavia) |
|
|
241 |
|
Termination costs in Germany |
|
|
104 |
|
Closure of Illkirch industrial activity |
|
|
47 |
|
Reorganization, outsourcing and termination costs in North American
plants (U.S. and Canada) |
|
|
82 |
|
Other plans in the world |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 146 disclosure related to plans initiated after December 31, 2002:
The evolution of the restructuring reserve under U.S. GAAP during the six months ended June
30, 2006 for the plans initiated after December 31, 2002, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Charged to |
|
or settled |
|
CTA and |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
expense |
|
(utilization) |
|
other |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euro) |
Alcatel-CIT |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Alcatel España S.A. (Spain) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Submarine Networks Division |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Space division |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Germany |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Alcatel USA |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Alcatel Business System
(Illkirch, France) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other (no individual amount
higher than 50 million) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
The major type of costs associated with the exit or disposal activities initiated after
December 31, 2002 and the information by reportable segment are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Total |
|
incurred in the |
|
amount |
|
|
amount |
|
first six months |
|
incurred as of |
Plans initiated in 2006 |
|
expected |
|
of 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euro) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
F-52
The major exit activity initiated during the first six months of 2006 is the following:
Beginning 2006, an additional restructuring plan was launched (based on volontary departures), to
enable SEL to remain competitive in reducing its cost base. Traditional switching business
continued to decline, which imposed a reduction of the workforce in the fixed segment as well as in
operations and general administration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Total |
|
incurred in the |
|
amount |
|
|
amount |
|
first six months |
|
incurred as of |
|
|
expected |
|
of 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euro) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
incurred in |
|
amount |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred in |
|
the first six |
|
incurred as of |
Plans initiated in 2005 |
|
expected |
|
2005 |
|
months of 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euro) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Other |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
In 2005, there is no plan exceeding 20 million individually. The major actions were taken
in Spain, Italy and France (mainly in the space activities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred in |
|
amount |
|
|
Total amount |
|
incurred in |
|
incurred in |
|
the first six |
|
incurred as of |
Plans initiated in 2004 |
|
expected |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
months of 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
The major exit activities initiated during 2004 are the following:
|
|
|
Alcatel España S.A. (Spain) restructuring plan |
In order to further reduce its fixed costs basis, Alcatel España S.A decided in the fourth
quarter of 2004 to extend the 2003 collective plan (see below). This extension was focused on
employees with high compensation costs and affects 130 employees.
F-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred in |
|
incurred as |
|
|
Total amount |
|
incurred in |
|
incurred in |
|
the first six |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
months of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
Alcatel USA exit activities |
Due to a shift in the Access market, Alcatel USA engaged in a plan to discontinue the 7201
product line. The discontinuation of this activity resulted in costs related to unused fixed
assets, contract manufacturing liabilities and the closure of part of the Petaluma, CA facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount incurred |
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
in the first six |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
months of |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount incurred |
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
in the first six |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
months |
|
of June 30, |
Plans initiated in 2003 |
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1057 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
Other |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
The figures in the above table do not include plans initiated in 2003 for companies that are
no longer consolidated.
The major exit activities initiated during 2003 and their impact in 2003 and 2004 are as
follows:
|
|
|
Alcatel-CIT restructuring Plan |
Due to the downturn in the telecom market, and more specifically, the domestic French market,
Alcatel CIT had to reduce its cost base to remain competitive. In January 2003, Alcatel CIT
management signed an agreement with French unions called accord de méthode, corresponding to the
overcapacity of more than 1,000 people.
CIT had to reduce its resources in Fixed networks, given on the one hand, the maturity of
voice activities and reduction of new functionalities requested by operators, and on the other
hand, the reduced R&D efforts and necessary
F-54
resources. Reduction in Wireline Transmission was due to decreased activities mostly related
to reduced SDH business (high capacity transmission). Terrestrial Transmission was hit by the drop
in sales as a consequence of the overall market downturn, impacting mostly marketing and operation
resources. The research division was penalized by a sharp activity downturn, particularly in
Optics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
in first six months |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
Alcatel España S.A. (Spain) restructuring plan: |
Due to the overall downsizing of the market affecting Europe and the local competition in
prices (particularly fixed networks products), Alcatel España had to reduce its cost base to remain
competitive in the local environment.
Starting mid 2002, the production of wireline access products at the Toledo site was
outsourced in order to address the general downturn in the telecommunication market and to allow
more flexibility. In addition, Alcatel management decided to concentrate the production of
switching products since several production sites were operating in Europe below capacity. The
switching production at the Villaverde site was stopped and the remaining volume was transferred to
Germany.
In March 2003, a new plan was launched with the goal of centralizing functions of the entire
Alcatel España organization. This plan eliminated much duplication in several functions and allowed
a greater use of the resources. As a consequence, the Villaverde site was closed and all the
employees working at this site were moved to the central office in Ramirez del Prado. In total,
approximately 460 persons were covered under this reorganization and restructuring plan.
In November 2003, an extension to the collective plan was negotiated with the unions to cover
a downsizing of the activities of the Integration and Service Division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
in first six months |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Submarine Networks Division restructuring plan |
After two years of strong growth within the submarine industry, the market collapsed in 2001.
Alcatels submarine worldwide sales decreased from 1.8 billion in 2001 to 0.5 billion in
2002 and 0.2 billion in 2003. Most of the operators in the submarine market filed for
Chapter11 protection, suspended payments, cancelled their contracts or asked for re-negotiation of
the contract terms.
In order to face this very difficult situation, the French locations were re-organized and a
social plan was implemented with a specific announcement in 2003. Given strong product synergies
with terrestrial optical systems, the production for new generation submarine systems were made in
the factories for optical terrestrial systems. The production of
cables in France was significantly recast to the future market
requirements.
F-55
Due to a general overcapacity on the wet maintenance market and accelerated by contract
terminations, a restructuring plan of the maintenance fleet was decided by management in the second
half of 2003 aiming at reducing the vessel fleet from eight to six. The restructuring covers mainly
the termination of the charter of one of the vessels as well as a write-off of another vessel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
in first six months |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization of Space Division: |
In 2001 and 2002, the satellite market suffered from a large market downturn, which led to
overcapacities in Alcatel Space and other main competitors in this industry.
Starting 2003, collective social plans were launched in France and in Belgium.
To further resolve the overcapacity issues, it was also decided to close the Norway and
Denmark subsidiaries and to transfer the workload to France.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount incurred |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
in first six months |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring plan in Germany: |
Due to considerable technological changes and a serious reduction in the digital switching
market, employment levels in Switching (particularly in installation/deployment) were sharply
decreasing in 2002 and 2003. Besides, due to a worldwide flat demand in Optical transmission
systems from 2001 onwards, the Optics factory in Stuttgart could no longer be sustained for
economic reasons. Voluntary leave and a reduction in working time in the first three quarters in
2003 were not sufficient as restructuring measures.
At the end of November 2003, a new restructuring plan was launched. Main activities impacted
were Switching (where Germany is one of the production units), Optical Transmission Systems (mainly
manufacturing activities) and general administration.
In 2004 and 2005, new actions (outsourcing of optical activities and new voluntary departures)
were implemented, giving rise to additional costs.
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
incurred |
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
in first six |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
months |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
of 2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Illkirch industrial activity: |
Beginning July 2001, Alcatel restructured its industrial activities related to the production
of GSM terminals at the Illkirch site. At first, the site was converted to the manufacture of
opto-electronic components. However, when the components market collapsed, Alcatel opted to seek
industrial work outside its own activities (Intraprise project).
As no significant workload could be found, Alcatel management announced in November 2003 the
closing of the Illkirch Industries Division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
incurred |
|
amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
in first six |
|
incurred as |
|
|
amount |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
incurred |
|
months of |
|
of June 30, |
|
|
expected |
|
in 2003 |
|
in 2004 |
|
in 2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions of euros) |
Termination benefits |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other associated costs |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Communications Group |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recognition provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45), were adopted on January 1, 2003. FIN 45 requires recognition of an initial liability
for the fair value of an obligation assumed by issuing a guarantee and is applied on a prospective
basis to all guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not
have a material effect on the audited consolidated financial statements.
Through our normal course of business, we have entered into guarantees and indemnifications
which mainly arose from the following situations:
|
|
|
Business sale agreements |
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property indemnification obligations |
|
|
|
|
Lease agreements |
|
|
|
|
Third-party debt agreements |
|
|
|
|
Indemnification of lenders and agents under our credit and support facilities and
security arrangements |
|
|
|
|
Indemnification of counterparties in receivables securitization transactions |
|
|
|
|
Other indemnification agreements |
Guarantees and indemnification agreements are mainly:
|
|
|
debt guarantees for third-party debt agreements, indemnification of lenders and
agents under our credit and support facilities and security arrangements and
indemnification of counterparties in receivables securitization transactions; |
|
|
|
and other contingent commitments. |
F-57
Regarding business sale agreements, the Group is unable to reasonably estimate the maximum
amount that could be payable under these arrangements because the exposures are not capped and
because of the conditional nature of the Groups obligations and the unique facts and circumstances
involved in each agreement.
The Group records a liability for product warranties corresponding to the estimated amount of
future repair and replacement costs for products still under warranty at the balance sheet date.
The liability is included in the reserves for product sales as disclosed in note 15 of the
unaudited condensed interim consolidation financial statements at June 30, 2006. The reserve is
calculated based on historical experience concerning the costs and frequency of repairs or
replacements.
Change of product warranty reserve during the first six months of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
As of January 1, 2006 |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional reserves |
|
|
64 |
|
Utilization |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Changes in estimates of pre-existing reserves |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Change in consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments and other changes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosures related to guarantees given are set forth in note 18.
(5) Recently issued U.S. accounting standards
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No.
155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133
and 140 (SFAS 155). SFAS 155 amends FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140). SFAS 155 among
other things permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains
an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS 155 is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. Alcatel does not believe that the standard will have a material
effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as reconciled to
U.S. GAAP.
In March 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 156). SFAS 156 amends SFAS 140 with respect
to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS 156 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after September 1, 2006. Alcatel does not believe that the
standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows as reconciled to U.S. GAAP.
In June, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48), an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes by prescribing a recognition threshold for tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interests and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. Alcatel is currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will
have on its financial position or results of operations.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task
Force), the AICPA and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact
on Alcatels present or future consolidated financial statements.
(6) Recently issued U.S. accounting exposure draft
On March 31, 2006, the FASB issued the exposure draft Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postemployment Benefit Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88,
106, and 132(R). The exposure draft is phase one of the FASBs stated intent to reform the pension
and other postretirement accounting and reporting standards and, if adopted in its current form,
would (1) require companies to recognize the current economic status on the balance sheet (whether
over funded or under funded for GAAP purposes but not for ERISA purposes), (2) require plan
obligations
F-58
to be measured as of the date of the employers statement of financial position (which we
currently do) and (3) require adoption for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006, which would
affect our year-end 2006 reporting. This exposure draft was subject to a public comment period
ending May 31, 2006 and further review and amendment by the FASB; it is uncertain what the
requirements of a final statement would be, when issued.
Note 24
Subsequent events
No favorable or unfavorable event occurred between the closing date and July 26, 2006, being
the date at which the Board of Directors of Alcatel approved the unaudited condensed interim
consolidated financial statements and authorized them to be published.
Regarding the contemplated merger between Lucent and Alcatel, on August 4, 2006, the SEC
declared effective Alcatels Registration Statement on Form F-4, registering the Alcatel ordinary
shares underlying the Alcatel American Depositary Shares to be issued in the proposed transaction.
On August 7, the French financial markets regulatory agency, the Autorité des marchés
financiers (AMF), issued an approval (visa) for the French prospectus (note dopération), in order
to allow, upon closing of the transaction between Alcatel and Lucent, the listing on the Eurolist
market of Euronext Paris of the new Alcatel shares to be issued to Lucent shareholders.
On September 7, 2006, during their respective shareholders meetings, Alcatel and Lucent
shareholders approved all the resolutions proposed by the Board of Directors relating to the merger
between the two companies.
On September 1, 2006, Alcatel announced that it has signed a non-binding Memorandum of
Understanding with Nortel to acquire its UMTS radio access business (UTRAN) and related assets for
USD 320 million. Pursuant to the transaction, Alcatel intends to acquire Nortels UMTS radio access
technology and product portfolio, associated patents and tangible assets as well as customer
contracts. It is anticipated that a significant majority of employees of Nortels UMTS access
business will be transferred to Alcatel.
As the technologies to be acquired could be substitutive to some of the technologies already
developed and capitalized by Alcatel and/or Lucent, an impairment loss would be accounted for, once
both the contemplated deal with Nortel and the merger with Lucent are completed. As the decision
related to which technologies will be maintained and which will be abandoned, is not yet taken and
as such a decision is contingent upon the closing of the two contemplated transactions, we are not
able to give the estimated amount of this potential impairment. As of June 30, 2006, the
technologies that could be potentially impaired were recorded in a 66 % owned joint venture named
Evolium and represented a net book value in Alcatels books of 140 million at 66 % ownership
and 212 million at 100% ownership.
F-59
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alcatel
|
|
Date: September 29, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ Jean-Pascal Beaufret
|
|
|
|
Jean-Pascal Beaufret |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|