Edgar Filing: CENTENE CORP

2015.06.30 Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

____________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

____________________________________________

(Mark One)



[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015



[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

____________________________________________

Commission file number: 001-31826

____________________________________________

CENTENE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	42-1406317
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

7700 Forsyth Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri	63105
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(314) 725-4477

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of July 17, 2015, the registrant had 119,090,635 shares of common stock outstanding.

CENTENE CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		PAGE

	Part I
	Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (unaudited)	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)	5
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31
	Part II
	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	32
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	32
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	44
Item 6.	Exhibits	45
Signatures		46

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

All statements, other than statements of current or historical fact, contained in this filing are forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify these statements by terminology including “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “seek,” “target,” “goal,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “can,” “continue” and other similar words or expressions in connection with, among other things, any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these statements include statements about our market opportunity, our growth strategy, competition, expected activities and future acquisitions, including our proposed merger with Health Net, Inc. (Health Net) (Proposed Merger), investments and the adequacy of our available cash resources. These statements may be found in the various sections of this filing, including those entitled “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” and Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings.” Readers are cautioned that matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, regulatory, competitive and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions.

All forward-looking statements included in this filing are based on information available to us on the date of this filing and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements included in this filing, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this filing. Actual results may differ from projections or estimates due to a variety of important factors applicable to both us and Health Net, including but not limited to:


•	our ability to accurately predict and effectively manage health benefits and other operating expenses and reserves;


•	competition;


•	membership and revenue projections;


•	timing of regulatory contract approval;


•	changes in healthcare practices;


•	changes in federal or state laws or regulations, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act and any regulations enacted thereunder;


•	changes in expected contract start dates;


•	changes in expected closing dates, estimated purchase price and accretion for acquisitions;


•	inflation;


•	foreign currency fluctuations;


•	provider and state contract changes;


•	new technologies;


•	advances in medicine;


•	reduction in provider payments by governmental payors;


•	major epidemics;


•	disasters and numerous other factors affecting the delivery and cost of healthcare;


•	the expiration, cancellation or suspension of our or Health Net's managed care contracts by federal or state governments (including but not limited to Medicare and Medicaid);


•	the outcome of our or Health Net's pending legal proceedings;


•	availability of debt and equity financing, on terms that are favorable to us;


•	changes in economic, political and market conditions;


•	the expected closing date of the Proposed Merger;


•	the possibility that the expected synergies and value creation from the Proposed Merger will not be realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period;


•	the risk that acquired businesses will not be integrated successfully;


•	disruption from the Proposed Merger making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships;


•	the risk that unexpected costs related to the Proposed Merger will be incurred;


•	the possibility that the Proposed Merger does not close, including, but not limited to, due to the failure to satisfy the closing conditions, including the receipt of approval of both Centene's stockholders and Health Net's stockholders; and


•	the risk that financing for the Proposed Merger may not be available on favorable terms.

This list of important factors is not intended to be exhaustive. We discuss certain of these matters more fully, as well as certain risk factors that may affect our business operations, financial condition and results of operations, in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

Table of Contents

Other Information

The discussion in Part I, Item 2. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the heading "Results of Operations" contains financial information for new and existing businesses. Existing businesses are primarily state markets, significant geographic expansion in an existing state or product that we have managed for four complete quarters. New businesses are primarily new state markets, significant geographic expansion in an existing state or product that conversely, we have not managed for four complete quarters.

Item 1A “Risk Factors” of Part II of this filing contains a further discussion of these and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations. We disclaim any current intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Due to these important factors and risks, we cannot give assurances with respect to our future premium levels or our ability to control our future medical costs.

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements.

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share data)

(Unaudited)



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,967		$	1,610
Premium and related receivables	1,248			912
Short term investments	140			177
Other current assets	483			335
Total current assets	3,838			3,034
Long term investments	1,541			1,280
Restricted deposits	101			100
Property, software and equipment, net	462			445
Goodwill	811			754
Intangible assets, net	148			120
Other long term assets	121			91
Total assets	$	7,022		$	5,824

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Medical claims liability	$	2,092		$	1,723
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,004			768
Return of premium payable	289			236
Unearned revenue	68			168
Current portion of long term debt	5			5
Total current liabilities	3,458			2,900
Long term debt	1,139			874
Other long term liabilities	330			159
Total liabilities	4,927			3,933
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	155			148
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	—			—
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares; 124,812,343 issued and 119,087,944 outstanding at June 30, 2015, and 124,274,864 issued and 118,433,416 outstanding at December 31, 2014	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	891			840
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(4		)	(1		)
Retained earnings	1,154			1,003
Treasury stock, at cost (5,724,399 and 5,841,448 shares, respectively)	(101		)	(98		)
Total Centene stockholders’ equity	1,940			1,744
Noncontrolling interest	—			(1		)
Total stockholders’ equity	1,940			1,743
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	7,022		$	5,824

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions, except share data)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Revenues:
Premium	$	4,692		$	3,331		$	8,991		$	6,402
Service	492			410			954			691
Premium and service revenues	5,184			3,741			9,945			7,093
Premium tax and health insurer fee	322			283			692			391
Total revenues	5,506			4,024			10,637			7,484
Expenses:
Medical costs	4,181			2,960			8,042			5,703
Cost of services	419			366			821			608
General and administrative expenses	442			321			845			616
Premium tax expense	239			253			520			331
Health insurer fee expense	52			31			107			63
Total operating expenses	5,333			3,931			10,335			7,321
Earnings from operations	173			93			302			163
Other income (expense):
Investment and other income	10			7			19			12
Interest expense	(11		)	(9		)	(21		)	(16		)
Earnings from continuing operations, before income tax expense	172			91			300			159
Income tax expense	84			45			147			79
Earnings from continuing operations, net of income tax expense	88			46			153			80
Discontinued operations, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $0, $1, $(1), and $1, respectively	—			2			(1		)	1
Net earnings	88			48			152			81
(Earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			1			(1		)	1
Net earnings attributable to Centene Corporation	$	88		$	49		$	151		$	82

Amounts attributable to Centene Corporation common shareholders:
Earnings from continuing operations, net of income tax expense	$	88		$	47		$	152		$	81
Discontinued operations, net of income tax expense (benefit)	—			2			(1		)	1
Net earnings	$	88		$	49		$	151		$	82

Net earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Centene Corporation:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.74		$	0.41		$	1.28		$	0.70
Discontinued operations	—			0.01			(0.01		)	0.01
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.74		$	0.42		$	1.27		$	0.71

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.72		$	0.39		$	1.24		$	0.68
Discontinued operations	—			0.02			(0.01		)	0.01
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.72		$	0.41		$	1.23		$	0.69

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	119,003,569			115,517,366			118,894,269			115,244,078
Diluted	122,965,011			119,434,516			122,785,459			119,094,840

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015			2014
Net earnings	$	88		$	48	$	152		$	81
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax	—			—		—			(1		)
Change in unrealized gain on investments, net of tax	(4		)	3		1			6
Foreign currency translation adjustments	1			—		(4		)	—
Other comprehensive earnings	(3		)	3		(3		)	5
Comprehensive earnings	85			51		149			86
Comprehensive (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			1		(1		)	1
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Centene Corporation	$	85		$	52	$	148		$	87

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Table of Contents

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In millions, except share data)

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015



	Centene Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock										Treasury Stock
	$.001 Par Value Shares	Amt		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings		$.001 Par Value Shares		Amt			Non controlling Interest			Total
Balance, December 31, 2014	124,274,864	$	—	$	840	$	(1	)	$	1,003	5,841,448		$	(98	)	$	(1	)	$	1,743
Comprehensive Earnings:
Net earnings	—	—		—		—			151		—		—			—			151
Change in unrealized gain on investments, net of tax	—	—		—		1			—		—		—			—			1
Foreign currency translation	—	—		—		(4		)	—		—		—			—			(4		)
Total comprehensive earnings																			148
Common stock issued for acquisition	—	—		9		—			—		(247,580	)	4			—			13
Common stock issued for employee benefit plans	537,479	—		3		—			—		—		—			—			3
Common stock repurchases	—	—		—		—			—		130,531		(7		)	—			(7		)
Stock compensation expense	—	—		33		—			—		—		—			—			33
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation	—	—		6		—			—		—		—			—			6
Reclassification to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—	—		—		—			—		—		—			1			1
Balance, June 30, 2015	124,812,343	$	—	$	891	$	(4	)	$	1,154	5,724,399		$	(101	)	$	—		$	1,940

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Table of Contents

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	152		$	81
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	53			42
Stock compensation expense	33			23
Deferred income taxes	(13		)	(11		)
Gain on settlement of contingent consideration	(10		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities
Premium and related receivables	(341		)	(161		)
Other current assets	(28		)	29
Other assets	(30		)	(29		)
Medical claims liabilities	366			284
Unearned revenue	(102		)	(18		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	166			160
Other long term liabilities	144			10
Other operating activities	5			2
Net cash provided by operating activities	395			412
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(58		)	(42		)
Purchases of investments	(513		)	(475		)
Sales and maturities of investments	276			221
Proceeds from asset sale	7			—
Investments in acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(11		)	(94		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(299		)	(390		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	3			4
Proceeds from borrowings	750			1,145
Payment of long term debt	(479		)	(945		)
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation	6			1
Common stock repurchases	(7		)	(5		)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest	—			5
Debt issue costs	(4		)	(6		)
Payment of contingent consideration obligation	(8		)	—
Net cash provided by financing activities	261			199
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	357			221
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,610			1,038
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,967		$	1,259
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	27		$	16
Income taxes paid	$	145		$	110
Equity issued in connection with acquisitions	$	13		$	132

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

CENTENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except share data)

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared under the presumption that users of the interim financial information have either read or have access to the audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The unaudited interim financial statements herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the December 31, 2014 audited financial statements have been omitted from these interim financial statements where appropriate. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented.

Certain 2014 amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on net earnings or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.

On February 2, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a two-for-one split of Centene's common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend distributed February 19, 2015 to stockholders of record on February 12, 2015. All share and per share information presented in this Form 10-Q has been adjusted for the two-for-one stock split.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) which supersedes existing revenue recognition standards with a single model unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., an insurance entity's insurance contracts). Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year. The new effective date is for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the new revenue recognition guidance.

In April 2015, the FASB issued an ASU which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under the new standard, debt issuance costs are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the cost is reported as interest expense. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to adopt this guidance beginning in the first quarter of 2015 and has applied the new standard retrospectively to all prior periods. The reclassification of debt issuance costs impacted the Consolidated Balance Sheets by decreasing both Other Long Term Assets and Long Term Debt by $14 million at December 31, 2014 and $16 million at June 30, 2015. These reclassifications have no effect on net earnings or stockholders' equity as previously reported.

In May 2015, the FASB issued an ASU which expands the disclosure requirements for insurance companies that issue short-duration contracts. The new standard will increase the level of disclosure around the Company's Medical Claims Liability to include the following: claims development by year; claim frequency; a rollforward of the claims liability; and a description of methods and assumptions used for determining the liability. It is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the new disclosure requirements.

Table of Contents

2. Acquisitions and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

Acquisitions

Community Health Solutions of America, Inc.

In July 2014, the Company completed a transaction whereby Community Health Solutions of America, Inc. assigned its contract with the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals under the Bayou Health Shared Savings Program to the Company's subsidiary, Louisiana Healthcare Connections (LHC). The fair value of consideration transferred included the present value of the estimated contingent consideration, subject to membership retained by LHC in the first quarter of 2015. The fair value of contingent consideration was $18 million at December 31, 2014. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company determined the amount of the actual contingent consideration to be $8 million. A gain of $10 million related to the settlement of the obligation was recorded in General and Administrative expense.

LiveHealthier, Inc.

In January 2015, the Company acquired the remaining 79% of LiveHealthier, Inc. (LiveHealthier) for $28 million, bringing its total ownership to 100%. LiveHealthier is a provider of technology and service-based health management solutions. The fair value of consideration of $28 million consists of cash paid of $11 million, Centene common stock issued at closing of $13 million, and the present value of contingent consideration of $4 million to be paid in cash over a three year period. The contingent consideration will not exceed $9 million.

The Company's allocation of fair value resulted in goodwill of $26 million and other identifiable intangible assets of $15 million. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes. The acquisition is recorded in the Managed Care segment.

Fidelis SecureCare of Michigan, Inc.

In May 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Fidelis SecureCare of Michigan, Inc. (Fidelis) a subsidiary of Concerto Healthcare, for $57 million. Fidelis was previously selected by the Michigan Department of Community Health to provide integrated healthcare services to members who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid in Macomb and Wayne counties. The fair value of consideration of $57 million consists of initial cash consideration of $7 million, the conversion of $16 million of notes funded prior to closing and the present value of the remaining contingent consideration payments of $34 million. The contingent consideration is based on duals membership and revenue per member during the first year of the contract, including reconciliation payments. The contingent consideration fair value is estimated based on expected membership during the first year of the contract as well as estimated revenue per member reflecting both member mix and risk adjustment.

The Company's preliminary allocation of fair vale resulted in goodwill of $28 million and other identifiable intangible assets of $24 million. The Company has not finalized the allocation of the fair value of assets and liabilities. 100% of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. The acquisition is recorded in the Managed Care segment.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

In January 2015, the Company sold 25% of its ownership in Celtic Insurance Company for $7 million. No gain or loss was recognized on the sale of the ownership interest. Celtic Insurance Company is included in the Managed Care segment. In connection with the sale of the ownership interest, the Company entered into a put agreement with the noncontrolling interest holder, allowing the noncontrolling interest holder to put its interest back to the Company beginning in 2022. As a result of put option agreements, the noncontrolling interest is considered redeemable and is classified in the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest section of the consolidated balance sheets.

A reconciliation of the changes in the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests is as follows ($ in millions):



Balance, December 31, 2014	$	148
Fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interest sold	7
Reclassification to redeemable noncontrolling interest	(1		)
Net earnings attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests	1
Balance, June 30, 2015	$	155

Table of Contents

3. Short term and Long term Investments, Restricted Deposits

Short term and long term investments and restricted deposits by investment type consist of the following ($ in millions):



	June 30, 2015									December 31, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	451	$	1	$	(1	)	$	451	$	393	$	1	$	(2	)	$	392
Corporate securities	632		2		(2		)	632		556		2		(2		)	556
Restricted certificates of deposit	6		—		—			6		6		—		—			6
Restricted cash equivalents	80		—		—			80		79		—		—			79
Municipal securities:
General obligation	96		—		—			96		54		—		—			54
Pre-refunded	4		—		—			4		5		—		—			5
Revenue	161		1		(1		)	161		101		1		—			102
Variable rate demand notes	28		—		—			28		14		—		—			14
Asset backed securities	162		—		—			162		180		—		—			180
Mortgage backed securities	77		1		—			78		84		1		—			85
Cost and equity method investments	68		—		—			68		68		—		—			68
Life insurance contracts	16		—		—			16		16		—		—			16
Total	$	1,781	$	5	$	(4	)	$	1,782	$	1,556	$	5	$	(4	)	$	1,557

Table of Contents

The Company’s investments are classified as available-for-sale with the exception of life insurance contracts and certain cost and equity method investments. The Company’s investment policies are designed to provide liquidity, preserve capital and maximize total return on invested assets with the focus on high credit quality securities. The Company limits the size of investment in any single issuer other than U.S. treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies. The Company's mortgage backed securities are issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and carry guarantees by the U.S. government. As of June 30, 2015, 48% of the Company’s investments in securities recorded at fair value that carry a rating by S&P or Moody’s were rated AAA/Aaa, 66% were rated AA-/Aa3 or higher, and 90% were rated A-/A3 or higher. At June 30, 2015, the Company held certificates of deposit, life insurance contracts and cost and equity method investments which did not carry a credit rating.

The fair value of available-for-sale investments with gross unrealized losses by investment type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows ($ in millions):



	June 30, 2015									December 31, 2014
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More
	Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	(1	)	$	162	$	—	$	16	$	—		$	72	$	(2	)	$	180
Corporate securities	(2		)	286		—		31		(2		)	311		—			1
Municipal securities:
General obligation	—			51		—		3		—			4		—			3
Revenue	(1		)	52		—		5		—			16		—			3
Pre-refunded	—			—		—		—		—			—		—			1
Asset backed securities	—			37		—		15		—			70		—			10
Mortgage backed securities	—			37		—		—		—			18		—			—
Total	$	(4	)	$	625	$	—	$	70	$	(2	)	$	491	$	(2	)	$	198

As of June 30, 2015, the gross unrealized losses were generated from 122 positions out of a total of 357 positions. The change in fair value of fixed income securities is a result of movement in interest rates subsequent to the purchase of the security.

For each security in an unrealized loss position, the Company assesses whether it intends to sell the security or if it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis for reasons such as liquidity, contractual or regulatory purposes. If the security meets this criterion, the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings. The Company does not intend to sell these securities prior to maturity and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell these securities prior to maturity; therefore, there is no indication of other-than-temporary impairment for these securities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recognized $4 million of income from equity method investments.

The contractual maturities of short term and long term investments and restricted deposits are as follows ($ in millions):



	June 30, 2015								December 31, 2014
	Investments				Restricted Deposits				Investments				Restricted Deposits
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
One year or less	$	140	$	140	$	99	$	99	$	176	$	177	$	92	$	92
One year through five years	1,325		1,326		2		2		1,121		1,121		8		8
Five years through ten years	135		135		—		—		121		120		—		—
Greater than ten years	80		80		—		—		38		39		—		—
Total	$	1,680	$	1,681	$	101	$	101	$	1,456	$	1,457	$	100	$	100

Table of Contents

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to call or prepayment options. Asset backed and mortgage backed securities are included in the one year through five years category, while cost and equity method investments and life insurance contracts are included in the five years through ten years category. The Company has an option to redeem at amortized cost substantially all of the securities included in the greater than ten years category listed above.

The Company continuously monitors investments for other-than-temporary impairment. Certain investments have experienced a decline in fair value due to changes in credit quality, market interest rates and/or general economic conditions. The Company recognizes an impairment loss for cost and equity method investments when evidence demonstrates that it is other-than-temporarily impaired. Evidence of a loss in value that is other-than-temporary may include the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment or the inability of the investee to sustain a level of earnings that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.

4. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon observable or unobservable inputs used to estimate fair value. Level inputs are as follows:



Level Input:		Input Definition:
Level I		Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.

Level II		Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.

Level III		Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2015, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis ($ in millions):



	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,967	$	—	$	—	$	1,967
Investments available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	433	$	3	$	—	$	436
Corporate securities	—		632		—		632
Municipal securities:
General obligation	—		96		—		96
Pre-refunded	—		4		—		4
Revenue	—		161		—		161
Variable rate demand notes	—		28		—		28
Asset backed securities	—		162		—		162
Mortgage backed securities	—		78		—		78
Total investments	$	433	$	1,164	$	—	$	1,597
Restricted deposits available for sale:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	80	$	—	$	—	$	80
Certificates of deposit	6		—		—		6
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	15		—		—		15
Total restricted deposits	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	101
Other long term assets: Interest rate swap agreements	$	—	$	10	$	—	$	10
Total assets at fair value	$	2,501	$	1,174	$	—	$	3,675
Liabilities
Other long term liabilities: Interest rate swap agreements	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	5
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	5

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2014, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis ($ in millions):



	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,610	$	—	$	—	$	1,610
Investments available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	360	$	17	$	—	$	377
Corporate securities	—		556		—		556
Municipal securities:
General obligation	—		54		—		54
Pre-refunded	—		5		—		5
Revenue	—		102		—		102
Variable rate demand notes	—		14		—		14
Asset backed securities	—		180		—		180
Mortgage backed securities	—		85		—		85
Total investments	$	360	$	1,013	$	—	$	1,373
Restricted deposits available for sale:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	79	$	—	$	—	$	79
Certificates of deposit	6		—		—		6
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	15		—		—		15
Total restricted deposits	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Other long term assets: Interest rate swap agreements	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	11
Total assets at fair value	$	2,070	$	1,024	$	—	$	3,094

The Company periodically transfers U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies between Level I and Level II fair value measurements dependent upon the level of trading activity for the specific securities at the measurement date. The Company’s policy regarding the timing of transfers between Level I and Level II is to measure and record the transfers at the end of the reporting period. At June 30, 2015, there were less than $1 million of transfers from Level I to Level II and $14 million of transfers from Level II to Level I. The Company utilizes matrix pricing services to estimate fair value for securities which are not actively traded on the measurement date. The Company designates these securities as Level II fair value measurements. The aggregate carrying amount of the Company’s life insurance contracts and other non-majority owned investments, which approximates fair value, was $84 million and $84 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

5. Health Insurance Marketplace

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established risk spreading premium stabilization programs effective January 1, 2014 for the Health Insurance Marketplace product. These programs, commonly referred to as the “three Rs,” include a permanent risk adjustment program, a transitional reinsurance program, and a temporary risk corridor program. Additionally, the ACA established a minimum annual medical loss ratio for the Health Insurance Marketplace. Each of the three R programs are taken into consideration to determine if the Company’s estimated annual medical costs are less than the minimum loss ratio and require an adjustment to Premium revenue to meet the minimum medical loss ratio.

In June 2015, CMS released final results on reinsurance and risk-adjustment for the 2014 plan year. These final results had an insignificant impact to the Company for the 2014 plan year.

Table of Contents

The Company's receivables (payables) for each of these programs are as follows ($ in millions):



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Risk adjustment	$	(99	)	$	(44	)
Reinsurance	20			11
Risk corridor	(29		)	(9		)
Minimum medical loss ratio	(18		)	(6		)

6. Debt

Debt consists of the following ($ in millions):



	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
$425 million 5.75% Senior notes, due June 1, 2017	$	429		$	429
$500 million 4.75% Senior notes, due May 15, 2022	500			300
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements	5			11
Senior notes	934			740
Revolving credit agreement	150			75
Mortgage notes payable	69			70
Capital leases	7			8
Debt issuance costs	(16		)	(14		)
Total debt	1,144			879
Less current portion	(5		)	(5		)
Long term debt	$	1,139		$	874

Senior Notes

In January 2015, the Company issued an additional $200 million of 4.75% Senior Notes ($200 Million Add-on Notes) at par. The $200 Million Add-on Notes were offered as additional debt securities under the indenture governing the $300 million of 4.75% Senior Notes issued in April 2014. In connection with the January 2015 issuance, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements for a notional amount of $200 million at a floating rate of interest based on the three month LIBOR plus 2.88%. Gains and losses due to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap completely offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the underlying debt and are recorded as an adjustment to the $200 Million Add-on Notes.

The indentures governing both the $425 million notes due 2017 and the $500 million notes due 2022 contain non-financial and financial covenants, including requirements of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of its interest rate exposure from fixed rates to floating rates to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on its cash equivalent and variable rate investment balances. The Company has $750 million of notional amount of interest rate swap agreements consisting of $250 million which are scheduled to expire on June 1, 2017 and $500 million that are scheduled to expire May 15, 2022. Under the Swap Agreements, the Company receives a fixed rate of interest and pays an average variable rate of the three month LIBOR plus 2.85% adjusted quarterly. At June 30, 2015, the weighted average rate was 3.12%.

The Swap Agreements are formally designated and qualify as fair value hedges and are recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in other assets or other liabilities. Gains and losses due to changes in fair value of the interest rate swap agreements completely offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the underlying debt. Therefore, no gain or loss has been recognized due to hedge ineffectiveness. Offsetting changes in fair value of both the interest rate swaps and the hedged portion of the underlying debt both were recognized in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company does not hold or issue any derivative instrument for trading or speculative purposes.

Table of Contents

Revolving Credit Agreement

The Company has an unsecured $500 million revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the agreement bear interest based upon LIBOR rates, the Federal Funds Rate or the Prime Rate. The agreement has a maturity date of June 1, 2018, provided it will mature 90 days prior to the maturity date of the Company's 5.75% Senior Notes due 2017 if such notes are not refinanced (or extended), certain financial conditions are not met, or the Company does not carry $100 million of unrestricted cash. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $150 million of borrowings outstanding under the agreement with a weighted average interest rate of 3.75%.

The agreement contains non-financial and financial covenants, including requirements of minimum fixed charge coverage ratios, maximum debt-to-EBITDA ratios and minimum tangible net worth. The Company is required to not exceed a maximum debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2015, there were no limitations on the availability under the revolving credit agreement as a result of the debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

Letters of Credit & Surety Bonds

The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $47 million as of June 30, 2015, which were not part of the revolving credit facility. The Company also had letters of credit for $53 million (valued at June 30, 2015 conversion rate), or €48 million, representing its proportional share of the letters of credit issued to support Ribera Salud’s outstanding debt, which are a part of the revolving credit facility. Collectively, the letters of credit bore interest at 1.64% as of June 30, 2015. The Company had outstanding surety bonds of $260 million as of June 30, 2015.

7. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net earnings per common share ($ in millions, except per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015			2014
Earnings attributable to Centene Corporation:
Earnings from continuing operations, net of tax	$	88	$	47	$	152		$	81
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		2		(1		)	1
Net earnings	$	88	$	49	$	151		$	82

Shares used in computing per share amounts:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	119,003,569		115,517,366		118,894,269			115,244,078
Common stock equivalents (as determined by applying the treasury stock method)	3,961,442		3,917,150		3,891,190			3,850,762
Weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive common shares outstanding	122,965,011		119,434,516		122,785,459			119,094,840

Net earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Centene Corporation:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.74	$	0.41	$	1.28		$	0.70
Discontinued operations	—		0.01		(0.01		)	0.01
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.74	$	0.42	$	1.27		$	0.71

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.72	$	0.39	$	1.24		$	0.68
Discontinued operations	—		0.02		(0.01		)	0.01
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.72	$	0.41	$	1.23		$	0.69

Table of Contents

The calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 excludes the impact of 49,754 and 59,828 shares, respectively, related to anti-dilutive stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. The calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 excludes the impact of 103,710 shares and 111,088 shares, respectively, related to anti-dilutive stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units.

8. Segment Information

Centene operates in two segments: Managed Care and Specialty Services. The Managed Care segment consists of Centene’s health plans including all of the functions needed to operate them. The Specialty Services segment consists of Centene’s specialty companies offering auxiliary healthcare services and products.

Segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2015, follows ($ in millions):



	Managed Care		Specialty Services		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Premium and service revenues from external customers	$	4,647	$	537	$	—		$	5,184
Premium and service revenues from internal customers	25		1,176		(1,201		)	—
Total premium and service revenues	$	4,672	$	1,713	$	(1,201	)	$	5,184
Earnings from operations	$	125	$	48	$	—		$	173

Segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2014, follows ($ in millions):



	Managed Care		Specialty Services		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Premium and service revenues from external customers	$	3,225	$	516	$	—		$	3,741
Premium and service revenues from internal customers	13		676		(689		)	—
Total premium and service revenues	$	3,238	$	1,192	$	(689	)	$	3,741
Earnings from operations	$	64	$	29	$	—		$	93

Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2015, follows ($ in millions):



	Managed Care		Specialty Services		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Premium and service revenues from external customers	$	8,890	$	1,055	$	—		$	9,945
Premium and service revenues from internal customers	49		2,251		(2,300		)	—
Total premium and service revenues	$	8,939	$	3,306	$	(2,300	)	$	9,945
Earnings from operations	$	220	$	82	$	—		$	302

Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2014, follows ($ in millions):



	Managed Care		Specialty Services		Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Premium and service revenues from external customers	$	6,195	$	898	$	—		$	7,093
Premium and service revenues from internal customers	26		1,315		(1,341		)	—
Total premium and service revenues	$	6,221	$	2,213	$	(1,341	)	$	7,093
Earnings from operations	$	108	$	55	$	—		$	163

Table of Contents

9. Contingencies

On July 5, 2013, the Company's subsidiary, Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc. (Kentucky Spirit), terminated its contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky (the Commonwealth). Kentucky Spirit believes it had a contractual right to terminate the contract and filed a lawsuit in Franklin Circuit Court seeking a declaration of this right. The Commonwealth has alleged that Kentucky Spirit's exit constitutes a material breach of contract. The Commonwealth seeks to recover substantial damages and to enforce its rights under Kentucky Spirit's $25 million performance bond. The Commonwealth's attorneys have asserted that the Commonwealth's expenditures due to Kentucky Spirit's departure range from $28 million to $40 million plus interest, and that the associated CMS expenditures range from $92 million to $134 million. Kentucky Spirit disputes the Commonwealth's alleged damages, and is pursuing its own litigation claims for damages against the Commonwealth.

On February 6, 2015, the Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a Franklin Circuit Court ruling that Kentucky Spirit does not have a contractual right to terminate the contract early. The Court of Appeals also found that the contract’s liquidated damages provision “is applicable in the event of a premature termination of the Contract term.” Kentucky Spirit intends to seek Kentucky Supreme Court review of the finding that its departure constituted a breach of contract. The Commonwealth may seek review of the ruling that the liquidated damages provision is applicable in the event of a premature termination.

Kentucky Spirit also filed a lawsuit in April 2013, amended in October 2014, in Franklin Circuit Court seeking damages against the Commonwealth for losses sustained due to the Commonwealth's alleged breaches. On December 9, 2014, the Franklin Circuit Court denied the Commonwealth's motion for partial summary judgment on Kentucky Spirit's damages claims. On March 15, 2015, the Franklin Circuit Court denied the Commonwealth's motion to stay discovery and ordered that discovery proceed on those claims.

On March 9, 2015, the Secretary of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS) issued a determination letter finding that Kentucky Spirit owed the Commonwealth $40 million in actual damages plus prejudgment interest at 8 percent. On March 18, 2015, in a letter to the Kentucky Finance and Administration Cabinet, Kentucky Spirit contested CHFS' jurisdiction to make such a determination. Depending on the response from the Finance and Administration Cabinet, Kentucky Spirit may bring the matter to the Franklin Circuit Court.

The resolution of the Kentucky litigation matters may result in a range of possible outcomes. If Kentucky Spirit prevails on its claims, it would be entitled to damages. If the Commonwealth prevails, a liability to the Commonwealth could be recorded. The Company is unable to estimate the ultimate outcome resulting from the Kentucky litigation. As a result, the Company has not recorded any receivable or any liability for potential damages under the contract as of June 30, 2015. While uncertain, the ultimate resolution of the pending litigation could have a material effect on the financial position, cash flow or results of operations of the Company in the period it is resolved or becomes known.

Excluding the Kentucky matters discussed above, the Company is also routinely subjected to legal proceedings in the normal course of business. While the ultimate resolution of such matters in the normal course of business is uncertain, the Company does not expect the results of any of these matters individually, or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

10. Subsequent Events

On July 2, 2015, the Company announced that the Company and two direct, newly formed subsidiaries of the Company had entered into a definitive merger agreement with Health Net, Inc. (Health Net) under which Centene will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Health Net. Under the terms of the agreement, at the closing of the transaction, Health Net stockholders (with limited exceptions) would receive 0.622 of a validly issued, fully paid, non-assessable share of Centene common stock and $28.25 in cash for each share of Health Net common stock. The transaction is valued at approximately $6.8 billion (based on the Centene closing stock price on July 1, 2015), including the assumption of debt. The transaction is expected to close in early 2016 and is subject to approval by Centene and Health Net stockholders, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, approvals by relevant state insurance and healthcare regulators and other customary closing conditions. The Company expects to fund the cash portion of the acquisition through a combination of existing cash on hand and debt financing.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this filing. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

In 2013, we classified the operations for Kentucky Spirit Health Plan (KSHP) as discontinued operations for all periods presented in our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion and analysis, with the exception of cash flow information, is presented in the context of continuing operations unless otherwise identified.

Key financial metrics for the second quarter of 2015 are summarized as follows:


•	Quarter-end managed care membership of 4.6 million, an increase of 1.3 million members, or 38% year over year.


•	Premium and service revenues of $5.2 billion, representing 39% growth year over year.


•	Health Benefits Ratio of 89.1%, compared to 88.9% in 2014.


•	General and Administrative expense ratio of 8.5%, compared to 8.6% in 2014.


•	Operating cash flows of $350 million for the second quarter of 2015.


•	Diluted net earnings per share of $0.72, compared to $0.39 in 2014.

The following items contributed to our revenue and membership growth over the last year:


•	California. In December 2014, the ABD membership of our California subsidiary, California Health and Wellness, increased as a result of the mandatory transition of the ABD population to managed care. The enrollment of this population to managed care was previously voluntary.

•

Florida. In May 2014, our Florida subsidiary, Sunshine Health, began operating under a new contract in 9 of 11 regions of the Managed Medical Assistance (MMA) program. The MMA program includes TANF recipients as well as ABD and dual-eligible members. In addition, we began operating as the sole provider under a new statewide contract for the Child Welfare Specialty Plan (Foster Care). Enrollment for both the MMA program and Foster Care began in May 2014 and was implemented by region through August 2014.


•	Health Insurance Marketplaces (HIM). In January 2015, we expanded our participation in Health Insurance Marketplaces to include members in certain regions of Illinois and Wisconsin.


•	Illinois. In March 2014, our Illinois subsidiary, IlliniCare Health, began operating under a new contract as part of the Illinois Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative serving dual-eligible members in Cook, DuPage, Lake, Kane, Kankakee and Will counties (Greater Chicago region).

In July 2014, IlliniCare Health began operating under a new contract with the Cook County Health and Hospitals System to perform third party administrative services to members enrolled in the CountyCare program, as well as care coordination, behavioral health, vision care and pharmacy benefit management services.

In September 2014, IlliniCare Health began serving additional Medicaid members under the state's Medicaid and Medicaid expansion programs.


•	Indiana. In February 2015, our Indiana subsidiary, Managed Health Services, began operating under an expanded contract with the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration to provide Medicaid services under the state's Healthy Indiana Plan 2.0 program.

Table of Contents

In April 2015, Managed Health Services began operating under an expanded contract with the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration to provide services to its ABD Medicaid enrollees who qualify for the new Hoosier Care Connect Program.


•	Louisiana. In July 2014, we completed the transaction whereby Community Health Solutions of America, Inc. (CHS) assigned its contract with the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals under the Bayou Health Shared Savings Program to our subsidiary, Louisiana Healthcare Connections (LHC).

In February 2015, LHC began operating under a new contract with the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals to serve Bayou Health (Medicaid) beneficiaries. Members previously served under the shared savings program were transitioned to the at-risk program on February 1, 2015.

•

Michigan. In May 2015, we completed the acquisition of Fidelis SecureCare of Michigan, Inc. (Fidelis). Fidelis began operating under a new contract with the Michigan Department of Community Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to provide integrated healthcare services to members who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid in Macomb and Wayne counties in May 2015. Passive enrollment began in July 2015.


•	Mississippi. In July 2014, our Mississippi subsidiary, Magnolia Health, began operating as one of two contractors under a new statewide managed care contract serving members enrolled in the Mississippi Coordinated Access Network program. Program expansion began in December 2014 and continued through July 2015.

In January 2015, Magnolia Health began operating under a new temporary six-month contract with the State of Mississippi to provide services under the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In July 2015, Magnolia Health began operating under a two-year CHIP contract with the State of Mississippi.


•	New Hampshire. In September 2014, our New Hampshire subsidiary, New Hampshire Healthy Families, began serving members under the state's Medicaid expansion program.

•

Ohio. In May 2014, our Ohio subsidiary, Buckeye Health Plan (Buckeye), began operating under a new contract with the Ohio Department of Medicaid and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to serve Medicaid members in a dual-eligible demonstration program in three of seven regions: Northeast (Cleveland), Northwest (Toledo) and West Central (Dayton). This three-year program, which is part of the Integrated Care Delivery System expansion, serves those who have both Medicare and Medicaid eligibility. Passive enrollment for Medicaid began in May 2014 and implementation was completed in July 2014. Passive enrollment for Medicare began in January 2015.


•	South Carolina. In February 2015, our South Carolina subsidiary, Absolute Total Care, began operating under a new contract with the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to serve dual-eligible members as part of the state's dual demonstration program.

•

Texas. In September 2014, we began operating under a new contract with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to expand our operations and serve STAR+PLUS members in two Medicaid Rural Service Areas. We also began providing expanded coverage in September 2014 under our STAR+PLUS contracts to provide acute care services for intellectually and developmentally disabled members. In March 2015, we began operating under an expanded STAR+PLUS contract with the Texas HHSC to include nursing facility benefits.

In March 2015, we also began operating under a new contract with the Texas HHSC and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to serve dual-eligible members in three counties as part of the state's dual demonstration program.


•	Vermont. In February 2015, Centurion began operating under a new contract with the State of Vermont Department of Corrections to provide comprehensive correctional healthcare services.

In addition, in July 2014, we completed an investment accounted for under the equity method for the purchase of a noncontrolling interest in Ribera Salud S.A. (Ribera Salud), a Spanish health management group. Centene is a joint shareholder with Ribera Salud's remaining investor, Banco Sabadell S.A.

Table of Contents

We expect the following items to contribute to our future growth potential:


•	We expect to realize the full year benefit in 2015 of business commenced during 2014 in Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio and Texas as discussed above.

•

In July 2015, we announced that we and two of our direct, newly formed subsidiaries had entered into a definitive merger agreement with Health Net, Inc. (Health Net) under which we will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Health Net. The transaction is valued at approximately $6.8 billion (based on the Centene closing stock price on July 1, 2015), including the assumption of debt. The transaction is expected to close in early 2016.


•	In July 2015, Centurion began operating under a new contract with the Mississippi Department of Corrections to provide comprehensive correctional healthcare services.


•	In May 2015, Sunshine Health was tentatively recommended for a statewide contract award by the Florida Healthy Kids Corporation to manage healthcare services for children ages five through 18 in all 11 regions of Florida. The two-year contract award is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2015.


•	In January 2015, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Agate Resources, Inc., a diversified holding company that offers primarily Medicaid and other healthcare products and services to Oregon residents. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2015, subject to customary closing conditions.


•	In December 2014, our subsidiary, Cenpatico Integrated Care, in partnership with University of Arizona Health Plan, was selected by the Arizona Department of Health Services/Division of Behavioral Health Services to be the Regional Behavioral Health Authority for the new southern geographic service area. The new contract is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2015.


•	In the fourth quarter of 2015, Louisiana Healthcare Connections expects to begin operating under an expanded contract to include behavioral health benefits, and Magnolia Health anticipates operating under an expanded contract to include the inpatient benefit for Medicaid and ABD members.

Table of Contents

MEMBERSHIP

From June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015, we increased our managed care membership by 1.3 million, or 38%. The following table sets forth our membership by state for our managed care organizations:



	June 30, 2015	December 31, 2014	June 30, 2014
Arizona	210,900	204,000	189,200
Arkansas	45,400	38,400	31,100
California	178,700	163,900	131,100
Florida	470,300	425,700	313,800
Georgia	405,000	389,100	373,000
Illinois	209,100	87,800	29,500
Indiana	250,400	197,700	200,500
Kansas	143,000	143,300	146,100
Louisiana	358,900	152,900	148,600
Massachusetts	61,500	48,400	47,200
Michigan	2,700	—	—
Minnesota	10,900	9,500	9,400
Mississippi	250,600	108,700	97,400
Missouri	82,600	71,000	58,700
New Hampshire	70,800	62,700	39,500
Ohio	287,100	280,100	225,900
South Carolina	112,600	109,700	101,800
Tennessee	21,400	21,000	21,300
Texas	969,700	971,000	921,500
Vermont	2,800	—	—
Washington	214,100	194,400	193,800
Wisconsin	78,600	83,200	67,300
Total at-risk membership	4,437,100	3,762,500	3,346,700
Non-risk membership	176,600	298,400	—
Total	4,613,700	4,060,900	3,346,700

At June 30, 2015, we served 368,900 Medicaid members in Medicaid expansion programs in California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio and Washington and Indiana HIP 2.0, included in the table above.

The following table sets forth our membership by line of business:



	June 30, 2015	December 31, 2014	June 30, 2014
Medicaid	3,300,600	2,754,900	2,385,500
CHIP & Foster Care	230,500	222,700	261,800
ABD, Medicare & Duals	414,300	392,700	329,700
LTC	72,800	60,800	53,500
Health Insurance Marketplaces	167,400	74,500	75,700
Hybrid Programs ¹	—	18,900	17,000
Behavioral Health	203,900	197,000	182,200
Correctional Healthcare Services	47,600	41,000	41,300
Total at-risk membership	4,437,100	3,762,500	3,346,700
Non-risk membership	176,600	298,400	—
Total	4,613,700	4,060,900	3,346,700

¹In February 2015, hybrid programs were converted to Medicaid expansion contracts.

Table of Contents

The following table identifies our dual-eligible membership by line of business. The membership tables above include these members.



	June 30, 2015	December 31, 2014	June 30, 2014
ABD	106,100	118,300	89,300
LTC	53,100	35,900	41,800
Medicare	8,500	7,200	6,800
Medicaid / Medicare Duals	19,700	3,200	1,400
Total	187,400	164,600	139,300

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is based on our consolidated statements of operations, which reflect our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

Summarized comparative financial data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 is as follows ($ in millions, except per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			% Change 2014-2015		2015			2014			% Change 2014-2015
Premium	$	4,692		$	3,331		40.9	%	$	8,991		$	6,402		40.4	%
Service	492			410			20.0	%	954			691			38.1	%
Premium and service revenues	5,184			3,741			38.6	%	9,945			7,093			40.2	%
Premium tax and health insurer fee	322			283			13.8	%	692			391			77.0	%
Total revenues	5,506			4,024			36.8	%	10,637			7,484			42.1	%
Medical costs	4,181			2,960			41.3	%	8,042			5,703			41.0	%
Cost of services	419			366			14.5	%	821			608			35.0	%
General and administrative expenses	442			321			37.7	%	845			616			37.2	%
Premium tax expense	239			253			(5.5	)%	520			331			57.1	%
Health insurer fee expense	52			31			67.7	%	107			63			69.8	%
Earnings from operations	173			93			86.0	%	302			163			85.3	%
Other income (expense), net	(1		)	(2		)	50.0	%	(2		)	(4		)	50.0	%
Earnings from continuing operations, before income tax expense	172			91			89.0	%	300			159			88.7	%
Income tax expense	84			45			86.7	%	147			79			86.1	%
Earnings from continuing operations, net of income tax	88			46			91.3	%	153			80			91.3	%
Discontinued operations, net of income tax expense of $0, $1, $(1) and $1, respectively	—			2			(100.0	)%	(1		)	1			(200.0	)%
Net earnings	88			48			83.3	%	152			81			87.7	%
(Earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			1			(100.0	)%	(1		)	1			(200.0	)%
Net earnings attributable to Centene Corporation	$	88		$	49		79.6	%	$	151		$	82		84.1	%

Amounts attributable to Centene Corporation common shareholders:
Earnings from continuing operations, net of income tax expense	$	88		$	47		87.2	%	$	152		$	81		87.7	%
Discontinued operations, net of income tax expense	—			2			(100.0	)%	(1		)	1			(200.0	)%
Net earnings	$	88		$	49		79.6	%	$	151		$	82		84.1	%

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Centene Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	0.72		$	0.39		84.6	%	$	1.24		$	0.68		82.4	%
Discontinued operations	—			0.02			(100.0	)%	(0.01		)	0.01			(200.0	)%
Total diluted earnings per common share	$	0.72		$	0.41		75.6	%	$	1.23		$	0.69		78.3	%

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Premium and Service Revenues

Premium and service revenues increased 39% in the three months ended June 30, 2015 over the corresponding period in 2014 primarily as a result of the impact from expansions or new programs in many of our states, particularly Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas.

Operating Expenses

Medical Costs

Results of operations depend on our ability to manage expenses associated with health benefits and to accurately estimate costs incurred. The Health Benefits Ratio, or HBR, represents medical costs as a percentage of premium revenues (excluding Premium Tax and Health Insurer Fee revenues) and reflects the direct relationship between the premium received and the medical services provided. The table below depicts the HBR for our membership by member category for the three months ended June 30,:



	2015		2014
Medicaid, CHIP, Foster Care & HIM	85.6	%	84.7	%
ABD, LTC and Medicare	93.7		94.9
Specialty Services	86.9		80.4
Total	89.1		88.9

The consolidated HBR for the three months ended June 30, 2015, was 89.1%, compared to 88.9% in the same period in 2014. The increase compared to last year is primarily attributable to a higher HBR associated with new programs in two of our states.

Revenue and HBR results for new business and existing business are listed below to assist in understanding our results of operations. Existing businesses are primarily state markets or significant geographic expansion in an existing state or product that we have managed for four complete quarters. New businesses are primarily new state markets or significant geographic expansion in an existing state or product that conversely, we have not managed for four complete quarters. The following table compares the results for new business and existing business for the three months ended June 30,:



	2015		2014
Premium and Service Revenue
New business	22	%	26	%
Existing business	78	%	74	%

HBR
New business	91.3	%	91.8	%
Existing business	88.5	%	87.9	%

The new business HBR decreased compared to last year as a result of a higher portion of new business associated with Medicaid, which operates at a lower HBR. The existing business HBR increased compared to last year as a result of higher acuity business, including Florida LTC, being classified as existing business in the current year.

Cost of Services

Cost of services increased by $53 million in the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the corresponding period in 2014. This was primarily due to the addition of the CountyCare contract in Illinois, which began July 1, 2014.

Table of Contents

General & Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses, or G&A, increased by $121 million in the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the corresponding period in 2014. This was primarily due to expenses for additional staff and facilities to support our membership growth. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded approximately $2 million of Health Net merger related expenses, which reduced our diluted earnings per share by $0.01.

The consolidated G&A expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was 8.5% and 8.6%, respectively. The year over year decrease in the G&A ratio reflects the leveraging of expenses over higher revenues in 2015.

Health Insurer Fee

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded $52 million of non-deductible expense for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) annual health insurer fee. As of June 30, 2015, we have received signed agreements from all applicable states which provide for the reimbursement of the ACA insurer fee including the related gross-up for the associated income tax effects. As a result, we recorded $84 million in Premium Tax and Health Insurer Fee revenue associated with the accrual for the reimbursement of the fee. Therefore, the health insurer fee had no impact on diluted earnings per share during the second quarter of 2015.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $31 million of non-deductible expense for the ACA annual health insurer fee. In addition, we received signed agreements from 14 of 17 applicable states as of June 30, 2014, which provide for the reimbursement of the ACA insurer fee including the related gross-up for the associated income tax effects. As a result, we recorded $30 million of revenue in Premium Tax and Health Insurer Fee revenue associated with the accrual for the reimbursement of the fee. The net effect of the health insurer fee reduced our diluted earnings per share by $0.08 during the second quarter of 2014.

Other Income (Expense)

The following table summarizes the components of other income (expense) for the three months ended June 30, ($ in millions):



	2015			2014
Investment and other income	$	10		$	7
Interest expense	(11		)	(9		)
Other income (expense), net	$	(1	)	$	(2	)

The increase in investment income in 2015 reflects an increase in investment balances over 2014 and improved performance of certain equity investments. Interest expense increased in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily reflecting the issuance of an additional $200 million in Senior Notes in January 2015.

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, was 48.8% and 49.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate is higher than the applicable statutory rate primarily as a result of the non-deductibility of the health insurer fee expense.

Table of Contents

Segment Results

The following table summarizes our consolidated operating results by segment for the three months ended June 30, ($ in millions):



	2015			2014			% Change 2014-2015
Premium and Service Revenues
Managed Care	$	4,672		$	3,238		44.3	%
Specialty Services	1,713			1,192			43.7	%
Eliminations	(1,201		)	(689		)	(74.3	)%
Consolidated Total	$	5,184		$	3,741		38.6	%
Earnings from Operations
Managed Care	$	125		$	64		95.3	%
Specialty Services	48			29			65.5	%
Consolidated Total	$	173		$	93		86.0	%

Managed Care

Premium and service revenues increased 44% in the three months ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of expansions or new programs in many of our states, particularly Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas. Earnings from operations increased $61 million between years primarily reflecting growth in the business.

Specialty Services

Premium and service revenues increased 44% in the three months ended June 30, 2015, resulting primarily from increased services associated with membership growth in the Managed Care segment. Earnings from operations increased $19 million in the three months ended June 30, 2015, primarily reflecting growth in the specialty services provided to our increased Managed Care membership.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Premium and Service Revenues

Premium and service revenues increased 40% in the six months ended June 30, 2015 over the corresponding period in 2014 primarily as a result of the impact from expansions or new programs in many of our states, particularly Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received premium rate adjustments which yielded a net 0% composite change across all of our markets.

Operating Expenses

Medical Costs



	2015		2014
Medicaid, CHIP, Foster Care & HIM	86.5	%	85.8	%
ABD, LTC and Medicare	93.4		94.0
Specialty Services	86.0		84.0
Total	89.4		89.1

The consolidated HBR for the six months ended June 30, 2015, was 89.4%, compared to 89.1% in the same period in 2014. The increase compared to last year is primarily attributable to an increase in higher acuity membership and higher flu related costs over the prior year.

Table of Contents

Cost of Services

Cost of services increased by $213 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the corresponding period in 2014. This was primarily due to the growth in the AcariaHealth business as well as the addition of the CountyCare contract in Illinois, which began July 1, 2014

General & Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses, or G&A, increased by $229 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the corresponding period in 2014. This was primarily due to expenses for additional staff and facilities to support our membership growth. During the first quarter of 2015, we recorded a gain of $10 million on the settlement of contingent consideration related to the CHS transaction. We also recorded expense of $10 million for a contribution to our charitable foundation during the first quarter of 2015.

The consolidated G&A expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was 8.5% and 8.7%, respectively. The year over year decrease in the G&A ratio reflects the leveraging of expenses over higher revenues in 2015 as well as the impact of transaction costs recognized in 2014.

Health Insurer Fee

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded $107 million of non-deductible expense for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) annual health insurer fee. As of June 30, 2015, we have received signed agreements from all applicable states which provide for the reimbursement of the ACA insurer fee including the related gross-up for the associated income tax effects. As a result, we recorded $172 million in Premium Tax and Health Insurer Fee revenue associated with the accrual for the reimbursement of the fee. Therefore, the health insurer fee had no impact on diluted earnings per share during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $63 million of non-deductible expense for the ACA annual health insurer fee. In addition, we recorded $60 million of revenue in Premium Tax and Health Insurer Fee revenue associated with the accrual for the reimbursement of the fee. The net effect of the health insurer fee reduced our diluted earnings per share by $0.16 during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Other Income (Expense)

The following table summarizes the components of other income (expense) for the six months ended June 30, ($ in millions):



	2015			2014
Investment and other income	$	19		$	12
Interest expense	(21		)	(16		)
Other income (expense), net	$	(2	)	$	(4	)

The increase in investment income in 2015 reflects an increase in investment balances over 2014 and improved performance of certain equity investments. Interest expense increased during the six months ended June 30, 2015 by $5 million primarily reflecting the issuance of $300 million of Senior Notes in April 2014 and the issuance of an additional $200 million in Senior Notes in January 2015.

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, was 49.0% and 49.7%, respectively. The effective tax rate is higher than the applicable statutory rate primarily as a result of the non-deductibility of the health insurer fee expense.

Table of Contents

Segment Results

The following table summarizes our consolidated operating results by segment for the six months ended June 30, ($ in millions):



	2015			2014			% Change 2014-2015
Premium and Service Revenues
Managed Care	$	8,939		$	6,221		43.7	%
Specialty Services	3,306			2,213			49.4	%
Eliminations	(2,300		)	(1,341		)	(71.5	)%
Consolidated Total	$	9,945		$	7,093		40.2	%
Earnings from Operations
Managed Care	$	220		$	108		103.7	%
Specialty Services	82			55			49.1	%
Consolidated Total	$	302		$	163		85.3	%

Managed Care

Premium and service revenues increased 44% in the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of expansions or new programs in many of our states, particularly Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas. Earnings from operations increased $112 million between years primarily reflecting growth in the business.

Specialty Services

Premium and service revenues increased 49% in the six months ended June 30, 2015, resulting primarily from increased services associated with membership growth in the Managed Care segment and growth in our AcariaHealth business. Earnings from operations increased $27 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily reflecting growth in the specialty services provided to our increased Managed Care membership.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Shown below is a condensed schedule of cash flows used in the discussion of liquidity and capital resources ($ in millions).



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	395		$	412
Net cash used in investing activities	(299		)	(390		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	261			199
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	357		$	221

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Normal operations are funded primarily through operating cash flows and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Operating activities provided cash of $395 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $412 million in the comparable period in 2014. The cash provided by operations in 2015 and 2014 was primarily related to net earnings and an increase in medical claims liabilities resulting from the growth in the business, partially offset by increases in premium and related receivables.

Cash flows from operations in each year were impacted by the timing of payments we receive from our states. States may prepay the following month premium payment, which we record as unearned revenue, or they may delay our premium payment, which we record as a receivable. We typically receive capitation payments monthly, however the states in which we operate may decide to adjust their payment schedules which could positively or negatively impact our reported cash flows from operating activities in any given period.

Table of Contents

The reimbursement of the HIF from our state customers may be settled as a separate payment or monthly in combination with our other premium payments. The vast majority of our state customers are settling the reimbursement through a separate payment after verification of each state’s portion of our HIF, resulting in an increase in Premium and Related Receivables at June 30, 2015.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Investing activities used cash of $299 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, and $390 million in the comparable period in 2014. Cash flows used in investing activities in 2015 primarily consisted of additions to the investment portfolio of our regulated subsidiaries, including transfers from cash and cash equivalents to long term investments and capital expenditures.

In January 2015, we sold 25% of our ownership in Celtic Insurance Company. No gain or loss was recognized on the sale of the ownership interest. Celtic Insurance Company is included in the Managed Care segment. Under the terms of the agreement, we entered into a put agreement with the noncontrolling interest holder to purchase the noncontrolling interest at a later date.

Cash flows used in investing activities in 2014 primarily consisted of additions to the investment portfolio of our regulated subsidiaries, including transfers from cash and cash equivalents to long term investments, the acquisition of U.S. Medical Management and capital expenditures.

We spent $58 million and $42 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, on capital expenditures for system enhancements and market expansions.

As of June 30, 2015, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of fixed-income securities with an average duration of 2.9 years. We had unregulated cash and investments of $82 million at June 30, 2015, compared to $85 million at December 31, 2014.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Our financing activities provided cash of $261 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $199 million in the comparable period in 2014. During 2015 and 2014, our financing activities primarily related to the proceeds from the issuance of Senior Debt. In January 2015, we issued an additional $200 million of 4.75% Senior Notes at par. In connection with the January 2015 issuance, we entered into interest rate swap agreements for a notional amount of $200 million. In April 2014, we issued $300 million 4.75% Senior Notes due May 14, 2022 at par. In connection with the April 2014 issuance, we entered into interest rate swap agreements of a notional amount of $300 million.

Liquidity Metrics

The $500 million revolving credit agreement contains non-financial and financial covenants, including requirements of minimum fixed charge coverage ratios, maximum debt-to-EBITDA ratios and minimum tangible net worth. We are required not to exceed a maximum debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 3.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2015, we had $150 million in borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and we were in compliance with all covenants. As of June 30, 2015, there were no limitations on the availability under the revolving credit agreement as a result of the debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

We had outstanding letters of credit of $47 million as of June 30, 2015, which were not part of our revolving credit facility. We also had letters of credit for $53 million (valued at the June 30, 2015 conversion rate), or €48 million, representing our proportional share of the letters of credit issued to support Ribera Salud’s outstanding debt which are a part of the revolving credit facility. Collectively, the letters of credit bore interest at 1.64% as of June 30, 2015. In addition, we had outstanding surety bonds of $260 million as of June 30, 2015.

The indentures governing our Senior Notes contains non-financial and financial covenants, including requirements of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.

At June 30, 2015, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of $380 million, compared to $134 million at December 31, 2014. We manage our short term and long term investments with the goal of ensuring that a sufficient portion is held in investments that are highly liquid and can be sold to fund short term requirements as needed.

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2015, our debt to capital ratio, defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt and total equity, was 37.1%, compared to 33.5% at December 31, 2014. Excluding the $69 million non-recourse mortgage note, our debt to capital ratio was 35.7% as of June 30, 2015, compared to 31.7% at December 31, 2014. We utilize the debt to capital ratio as a measure, among others, of our leverage and financial flexibility.

2015 Expectations

As previously discussed, in January 2015, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire Agate Resources, Inc. The transaction is expected to close during the third quarter of 2015, subject to customary closing conditions.

On July 2, 2015, we announced that we and two of our direct, newly formed subsidiaries had entered into a definitive merger agreement with Health Net under which we will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Health Net. Under the terms of the agreement, at the closing of the transaction, Health Net stockholders (with limited exception) would receive 0.622 of a validly issued, fully paid, non-assessable share of Centene common stock and $28.25 in cash for each share of Health Net common stock. The transaction is valued at approximately $6.8 billion (based on the Centene closing stock price on July 1, 2015), including the assumption of debt. The transaction is expected to close in early 2016 and is subject to approval by Centene and Health Net stockholders, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, approvals by relevant state insurance and healthcare regulators and other customary closing conditions. We expect to fund the cash portion of the acquisition through a combination of existing cash on hand and debt financing.

During the remainder of 2015, we expect to make net capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries of approximately $305 million associated with our growth and spend approximately $110 million in additional capital expenditures primarily associated with system enhancements and market expansions. These capital contributions are expected to be funded by unregulated cash flow generation in 2015 and borrowings on our revolving credit facility.

Based on our operating plan, we expect that our available cash, cash equivalents and investments, cash from our operations and cash available under our credit facility will be sufficient to finance our general operations and capital expenditures, excluding the proposed Health Net transaction, for at least 12 months from the date of this filing.

REGULATORY CAPITAL AND DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS

Our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As managed care organizations, these subsidiaries are subject to state regulations that, among other things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory capital, as defined by each state, and restrict the timing, payment and amount of dividends and other distributions that may be paid to us. Generally, the amount of dividend distributions that may be paid by a regulated subsidiary without prior approval by state regulatory authorities is limited based on the entity’s level of statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus.

Our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum capital requirements prescribed by various regulatory authorities in each of the states in which we operate. As of June 30, 2015, our subsidiaries had aggregate statutory capital and surplus of $1,827 million, compared with the required minimum aggregate statutory capital and surplus requirements of $1,008 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we contributed $437 million of statutory capital to our subsidiaries. We estimate our Risk Based Capital, or RBC, percentage (including KSHP) to be in excess of 350% of the Authorized Control Level (excluding the interim impact of the health insurer fee).

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has adopted rules which set minimum risk based capital requirements for insurance companies, managed care organizations and other entities bearing risk for healthcare coverage. As of June 30, 2015, each of our health plans was in compliance with the risk-based capital requirements enacted in those states.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

INVESTMENTS AND DEBT

As of June 30, 2015, we had short term investments of $140 million and long term investments of $1,642 million, including restricted deposits of $101 million. The short term investments generally consist of highly liquid securities with maturities between three and 12 months. The long term investments consist of municipal, corporate and U.S. Treasury securities, government sponsored obligations, life insurance contracts, asset backed securities and equity securities and have maturities greater than one year. Restricted deposits consist of investments required by various state statutes to be deposited or pledged to state agencies. Due to the nature of the states’ requirements, these investments are classified as long term regardless of the contractual maturity date. Substantially all of our investments are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market rates increase. Assuming a hypothetical and immediate 1% increase in market interest rates at June 30, 2015, the fair value of our fixed income investments would decrease by approximately $43 million. Declines in interest rates over time will reduce our investment income.

We have interest rate swap agreements for a notional amount of $750 million with creditworthy financial institutions to manage the impact of market interest rates on interest expense. Our swap agreements convert a portion of our interest expense from fixed to variable rates to better match the impact of changes in market rates on our variable rate cash equivalent investments. As a result, the fair value of $750 million of our long term debt varies with market interest rates. Assuming a hypothetical and immediate 1% increase in market interest rates at June 30, 2015, the fair value of our debt would decrease by approximately $35 million. An increase in interest rates decreases the fair value of the debt and conversely, a decrease in interest rates increases the value.

For a discussion of the interest rate risk that our investments are subject to, see Part II, Item 1A "Risk Factors–Risks Related to Our Business–Our investment portfolio may suffer losses from reductions in market interest rates and changes in market conditions which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or liquidity.”

INFLATION

The inflation rate for medical care costs has been higher than the overall inflation rate for all items. We use various strategies to mitigate the negative effects of healthcare cost inflation. Specifically, our health plans try to control medical and hospital costs through our state savings initiatives and contracts with independent providers of healthcare services. Through these contracted care providers, our health plans emphasize preventive healthcare and appropriate use of specialty and hospital services. Additionally, our contracts with states require actuarially sound premiums that include healthcare cost trend.

While we currently believe our strategies to mitigate healthcare cost inflation will continue to be successful, competitive pressures, new healthcare and pharmaceutical product introductions, demands from healthcare providers and customers, applicable regulations, an increase in the expected rate of inflation for healthcare costs or other factors may affect our ability to control the impact of healthcare cost increases.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures - We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the filing of this Form 10-Q, management evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2015.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting - No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS AND THE

TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, in which case you could lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to the other information in this filing, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of or that we currently deem immaterial also may become important factors that affect our Company.

Table of Contents

Reductions in funding or changes to eligibility requirements for government sponsored healthcare programs in which we participate could substantially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The majority of our revenues come from government subsidized healthcare programs including Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, LTC, ABD, Foster Care and Health Insurance Marketplace premiums. The base premium rate paid for each program differs, depending on a combination of factors such as defined upper payment limits, a member’s health status, age, gender, county or region and benefit mix. Since Medicaid was created in 1965, the federal government and the states have shared the costs, with the federal share currently averaging around 57%.

Future levels of funding and premium rates may be affected by continuing government efforts to contain healthcare costs and may further be affected by state and federal budgetary constraints. Governments periodically consider reducing or reallocating the amount of money they spend for Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, LTC, ABD and Foster Care. Adverse economic conditions may continue to put pressures on state budgets as tax and other state revenues decrease while the population that is eligible to participate in these programs increases, creating more need for funding. We anticipate this will require government agencies to find funding alternatives, which may result in reductions in funding for programs, contraction of covered benefits, and limited or no premium rate increases or premium rate decreases. A reduction (or less than expected increase), a protracted delay, or a change in allocation methodology in government funding for these programs, as well as termination of the contract for the convenience of the government, may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Additionally, changes in these programs could reduce the number of persons enrolled in or eligible for these programs or increase our administrative or healthcare costs under these programs. Recent legislation generally requires that eligibility levels be maintained, but this could cause states to reduce reimbursement or reduce benefits in order for states to afford to maintain eligibility levels. If any state in which we operate were to decrease premiums paid to us or pay us less than the amount necessary to keep pace with our cost trends, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Lastly, if a federal government shutdown were to occur for a prolonged period of time, federal government payment obligations, including its obligations under Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, LTC, ABD, Foster Care and the new Health Insurance Marketplaces, may be delayed. If the federal government fails to make payments under these programs on a timely basis, our business could suffer, and our financial position, results of operations or cash flows may be materially affected.

Failure to accurately estimate and price our medical expenses or effectively manage our medical costs or related administrative costs could negatively affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Our profitability, to a significant degree, depends on our ability to estimate and effectively manage expenses related to health benefits through our ability to contract favorably with hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers. For example, our Medicaid revenue is often based on bids submitted before the start of the initial contract year. If our actual medical expense exceeds our estimates, our health benefits ratio, or our expenses related to medical services as a percentage of premium revenue, would increase and our profits would decline. Because of the narrow margins of our health plan business, relatively small changes in our health benefits ratio can create significant changes in our financial results. Changes in healthcare regulations and practices, the level of utilization of healthcare services, hospital and pharmaceutical costs, major epidemics or pandemics, new medical technologies, pharmaceutical compounds and other external factors, including general economic conditions such as inflation and unemployment levels, are beyond our control and could reduce our ability to accurately predict and effectively control the costs of providing health benefits.

Our medical expense includes claims reported but not paid, estimates for claims incurred but not reported, and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims at the end of each period. Our development of the medical claims liability estimate is a continuous process which we monitor and refine on a monthly basis as claims receipts and payment information as well as inpatient acuity information becomes available. As more complete information becomes available, we adjust the amount of the estimate, and include the changes in estimates in medical expense in the period in which the changes are identified. However, we still cannot be sure that our medical claims liability estimate is adequate or that adjustments to the estimate will not unfavorably impact our results of operations.

Table of Contents

Additionally, when we commence operations in a new state, region or product, we have limited information with which to estimate our medical claims liability. For a period of time after the inception of the new business, we base our estimates on state-provided historical actuarial data and limited actual incurred and received claims and inpatient acuity information. The addition of new categories of individuals who are eligible under new legislation may pose the same difficulty in estimating our medical claims liability. Similarly, we may face difficulty in estimating our medical claims liability in 2015 for the relatively new and evolving Health Insurance Marketplaces.

From time to time in the past, our actual results have varied from our estimates, particularly in times of significant changes in the number of our members. If it is determined that our estimates are significantly different than actual results, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected. In addition, if there is a significant delay in our receipt of premiums, our business operations, cash flows, or earnings could be negatively impacted.

The implementation of the Health Reform Legislation and other reforms could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the accompanying Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, collectively referred to as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), were enacted. While the constitutionality of the ACA was generally upheld by the Supreme Court in 2012, the Court determined that states could not be required to expand Medicaid and risk losing all federal money for their existing Medicaid programs.

Under the ACA, Medicaid coverage was expanded to all individuals under age 65 with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level beginning January 1, 2014, subject to each states' election. The federal government will pay the entire costs for Medicaid coverage for newly eligible beneficiaries for three years (2014 through 2016). Beginning in 2017, the federal share begins to decline, ending at 90% for 2020 and subsequent years. As of March 6, 2015, 29 states and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid eligibility, and additional states continue to discuss expansion. The ACA also maintained CHIP eligibility standards through September 2019.

The ACA required the establishment of Health Insurance Marketplaces for individuals and small employers to purchase health insurance coverage commencing in January 2014. Open enrollment for coverage in 2015 began on November 15, 2014 and continued until February 15, 2015. The ACA required insurers participating on the Health Insurance Marketplaces to offer a minimum level of benefits and included guidelines on setting premium rates and coverage limitations.

Our ability to adequately price products offered in the Health Insurance Marketplaces may have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial position and cash flow. We may be adversely selected by individuals who will have a higher acuity level than the anticipated pool of participants. In addition, the risk corridor, reinsurance and risk adjustment ("three Rs") provisions of the ACA established to reduce risk for insurers may not be effective in appropriately mitigating the financial risks related to the Marketplace product. Further, the reinsurance and risk corridor components may not be adequately funded. Any variation from our expectations regarding acuity, enrollment levels, adverse selection, the three Rs, or other assumptions utilized in setting adequate premium rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has stated that it will consider a limited number of premium assistance demonstration proposals from States that want to privatize Medicaid expansion. States must provide a choice between at least two qualified health plans and offer very similar benefits as those available in the newly created Health Insurance Marketplaces. Arkansas became the first state to obtain federal approval to use Medicaid funding to purchase private insurance for low-income residents and we began operations under the program beginning January 1, 2014.

The ACA imposes an annual insurance industry assessment of $8.0 billion starting in 2014, and $11.3 billion in each of 2015 and 2016, with increasing annual amounts thereafter. Such assessments are not deductible for federal and most state income tax purposes. The fee will be allocated based on health insurers' premium revenues in the previous year. Each health insurer's fee is calculated by multiplying its market share by the annual fee. Market share is based on commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid premium revenue. Not-for-profit insurers may have a competitive advantage since they are exempt from paying the fee if they receive at least 80% of their premium revenue from Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP, and other not-for-profit insurers are allowed to exclude 50% of their premium revenue from the fee calculation. If this federal premium assessment is imposed as enacted, and if we are not reimbursed by the states for the cost of the federal premium assessment (including the associated tax impact), or if we are unable to otherwise adjust our business model to address this new assessment, our results of operations, financial position and cash flows may be materially adversely affected.

Table of Contents

There are numerous steps required to implement the legislation, including the promulgation of a substantial number of new and potentially more onerous federal regulations. Further, various health insurance reform proposals are also emerging at the state level. Because of the unsettled nature of these reforms and numerous steps required to implement them, we cannot predict what additional health insurance requirements will be implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect that any future legislation or regulation will have on our business or our growth opportunities. Although we believe the legislation may provide us with significant opportunities to grow our business, the enacted reforms, as well as future regulations and legislative changes, may in fact have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. If we fail to effectively implement our operational and strategic initiatives with respect to the implementation of healthcare reform, or do not do so as effectively as our competitors, our results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our business activities are highly regulated and new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations or their enforcement or application could force us to change how we operate and could harm our business.

Our business is extensively regulated by the states in which we operate and by the federal government. In addition, the managed care industry has received negative publicity that has led to increased legislation, regulation, review of industry practices and private litigation in the commercial sector. In each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, we are regulated by the relevant insurance, health and/or human services departments that oversee the activities of managed care organizations providing or arranging to provide services to Medicaid, Medicare and Health Insurance Marketplace enrollees. For example, our health plan subsidiaries, as well as our applicable specialty companies, must comply with minimum statutory capital and other financial solvency requirements, such as deposit and surplus requirements.

The frequent enactment of, changes to, or interpretations of laws and regulations could, among other things: force us to restructure our relationships with providers within our network; require us to implement additional or different programs and systems; restrict revenue and enrollment growth; increase our healthcare and administrative costs; impose additional capital and surplus requirements; and increase or change our liability to members in the event of malpractice by our contracted providers. In addition, changes in political party or administrations at the state, federal or country level may change the attitude towards healthcare programs.

Additionally, the taxes and fees paid to federal, state and local governments may increase due to several factors, including: enactment of, changes to, or interpretations of tax laws and regulations, audits by governmental authorities, geographic expansions into higher taxing jurisdictions and the effect of expansions into international markets.

Our contracts with states may require us to maintain a minimum health benefits ratio (HBR) or may require us to share profits in excess of certain levels. In certain circumstances, our plans may be required to return premium back to the state in the event profits exceed established levels or HBR does not meet the minimum requirement. Other states may require us to meet certain performance and quality metrics in order to maintain our contract or receive additional or full contractual revenue.

The governmental healthcare programs in which we participate are subject to the satisfaction of certain regulations and performance standards. For example, under Health Reform Legislation, Congress authorized CMS and the states to implement managed care demonstration programs to serve dually eligible beneficiaries to improve the coordination of their care. Participation in these demonstration programs is subject to CMS approval and the satisfaction of conditions to participation, including meeting certain performance requirements. Our inability to improve or maintain adequate quality scores and star ratings to meet government performance requirements or to match the performance of our competitors could result in limitations to our participation in or exclusion from these or other government programs. Specifically, several of our Medicaid contracts require us to maintain a Medicare health plan. Although we strive to comply with all existing regulations and to meet performance standards applicable to our business, failure to meet these requirements could result in financial fines and penalties. Also, states may not allow us to continue to participate in their government programs, or we may fail to win procurements to participate in such programs which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In addition, as a result of the expansion of our businesses and operations conducted in foreign countries, we face political, economic, legal, compliance, regulatory, operational and other risks and exposures that are unique and vary by jurisdiction. These foreign regulatory requirements with respect to, among other items, environmental, tax, licensing, intellectual property, privacy, data protection, investment, capital, management control, labor relations, and fraud and corruption regulations are different than those faced by our domestic businesses. In addition, we are subject to U.S. laws that regulate the conduct and activities of U.S.-based businesses operating abroad, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Our failure to comply with laws and regulations governing our conduct outside the United States or to successfully navigate international regulatory regimes that apply to us could adversely affect our ability to market our products and services, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Our businesses providing pharmacy benefit management (PBM) and specialty pharmacy services face regulatory and other risks and uncertainties which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We provide PBM and specialty pharmacy services through our US Script and AcariaHealth businesses. Each business is subject to federal and state laws that govern the relationships of the business with pharmaceutical manufacturers, physicians, pharmacies, customers and consumers. They also conduct business as a mail order pharmacy and specialty pharmacy, which subjects them to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations. In addition, federal and state legislatures regularly consider new regulations for the industry that could materially and adversely affect current industry practices, including the receipt or disclosure of rebates from pharmaceutical companies, the development and use of formularies, and the use of average wholesale prices.

Our PBM and specialty pharmacy businesses would be materially and adversely affected by an inability to contract on favorable terms with pharmaceutical manufacturers and other suppliers, and could face potential claims in connection with purported errors by our mail order or specialty pharmacies, including in connection with the risks inherent in the authorization, compounding, packaging and distribution of pharmaceuticals and other healthcare products. Disruptions at any of our mail order or specialty pharmacies due to an event that is beyond our control could affect our ability to process and dispense prescriptions in a timely manner and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

If any of our government contracts are terminated or are not renewed or we receive an adverse review, audit or investigation, our business will suffer.

We provide managed care programs and selected services to individuals receiving benefits under governmental assistance programs. We provide those healthcare services under contracts with regulatory entities in the areas in which we operate. Our government contracts are generally intended to run for three years and may be extended for additional years if the contracting entity or its agent elects to do so. When our contracts expire, they may be opened for bidding by competing healthcare providers, and there is no guarantee that our contracts will be renewed or extended. Competitors may buy their way into the market by submitting bids with lower pricing. Further, our government contracts contain certain provisions regarding eligibility, enrollment and dis-enrollment processes for covered services, eligible providers, periodic financial and informational reporting, quality assurance, timeliness of claims payment and agreement to maintain a Medicare plan in the state and financial standards and are subject to cancellation if we fail to perform in accordance with the standards set by regulatory agencies.

We are also subject to various reviews, audits and investigations to verify our compliance with the terms of our contracts with various governmental agencies and applicable laws and regulations. Any adverse review, audit or investigation could result in: cancellation of our contracts; refunding of amounts we have been paid pursuant to our contracts; imposition of fines, penalties and other sanctions on us; loss of our right to participate in various programs; increased difficulty in selling our products and services; or loss of one or more of our licenses.

If any of our government contracts are terminated, not renewed, renewed on less favorable terms, or not renewed on a timely basis, or we have an adverse review, audit or investigation, our business will suffer, our goodwill could be impaired and our financial position, results of operations or cash flows may be materially affected.

Ineffectiveness of state-operated systems and subcontractors could adversely affect our business.

Our health plans rely on other state-operated systems or subcontractors to qualify, solicit, educate and assign eligible members into managed care plans. The effectiveness of these state operations and subcontractors can have a material effect on a health plan’s enrollment in a particular month or over an extended period. When a state implements new programs to determine eligibility, new processes to assign or enroll eligible members into health plans, or chooses new subcontractors, there is an increased potential for an unanticipated impact on the overall number of members assigned to managed care plans.

Table of Contents

Our investment portfolio may suffer losses which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or liquidity.

We maintain a significant investment portfolio of cash equivalents and short term and long term investments in a variety of securities, which are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks and will decline in value if interest rates increase or one of the issuers’ credit ratings is reduced. As a result, we may experience a reduction in value or loss of liquidity of our investments, which may have a negative adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Execution of our growth strategy may increase costs or liabilities, or create disruptions in our business.

Our growth strategy includes the acquisition of health plans participating in government sponsored healthcare programs and specialty services businesses, contract rights and related assets of other health plans both in our existing service areas and in new markets and start-up operations in new markets or new products in existing markets. Although we review the records of companies or businesses we plan to acquire, it is possible that we could assume unanticipated liabilities or adverse operating conditions, or an acquisition may not perform as well as expected or may not achieve timely profitability. We also face the risk that we will not be able to effectively integrate acquisitions into our existing operations effectively without substantial expense, delay or other operational or financial problems and we may need to divert more management resources to integration than we planned.

In connection with start-up operations, we may incur significant expenses prior to commencement of operations and the receipt of revenue. For example, in order to obtain a certificate of authority in most jurisdictions, we must first establish a provider network, have systems in place and demonstrate our ability to administer a state contract and process claims. We may experience delays in operational start dates. As a result of these factors, start-up operations may decrease our profitability. In addition, we are planning to expand our business internationally and we will be subject to additional risks, including, but not limited to, political risk, an unfamiliar regulatory regime, currency exchange risk and exchange controls, cultural and language differences, foreign tax issues, and different labor laws and practices.

If we are unable to effectively execute our growth strategy, our future growth will suffer and our results of operations could be harmed.

If competing managed care programs are unwilling to purchase specialty services from us, we may not be able to successfully implement our strategy of diversifying our business lines.

We are seeking to diversify our business lines into areas that complement our government sponsored health plan business in order to grow our revenue stream and balance our dependence on risk reimbursement. In order to diversify our business, we must succeed in selling the services of our specialty subsidiaries not only to our managed care plans, but to programs operated by third-parties. Some of these third-party programs may compete with us in some markets, and they therefore may be unwilling to purchase specialty services from us. In any event, the offering of these services will require marketing activities that differ significantly from the manner in which we seek to increase revenues from our government sponsored programs. Our ineffectiveness in marketing specialty services to third-parties may impair our ability to execute our business strategy.

Adverse credit market conditions may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or our ability to obtain credit on acceptable terms.

The securities and credit markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years. The availability of credit, from virtually all types of lenders, has at times been restricted. In the event we need access to additional capital to pay our operating expenses, fund subsidiary surplus requirements, make payments on or refinance our indebtedness, pay capital expenditures, or fund acquisitions, our ability to obtain such capital may be limited and the cost of any such capital may be significant, particularly if we are unable to access our existing credit facility.

Our access to additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as prevailing economic and credit market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to our industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, and perceptions of our financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If a combination of these factors were to occur, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all.

Table of Contents

If state regulators do not approve payments of dividends and distributions by our subsidiaries to us, we may not have sufficient funds to implement our business strategy.

We principally operate through our health plan subsidiaries. As part of normal operations, we may make requests for dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries to fund our operations. These subsidiaries are subject to regulations that limit the amount of dividends and distributions that can be paid to us without prior approval of, or notification to, state regulators. If these regulators were to deny our subsidiaries’ request to pay dividends, the funds available to us would be limited, which could harm our ability to implement our business strategy.

We derive a majority of our premium revenues from operations in a limited number of states, and our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would be materially affected by a decrease in premium revenues or profitability in any one of those states.

Operations in a limited number of states have accounted for most of our premium revenues to date. If we were unable to continue to operate in any of our current states or if our current operations in any portion of one of those states were significantly curtailed, our revenues could decrease materially. Our reliance on operations in a limited number of states could cause our revenue and profitability to change suddenly and unexpectedly depending on legislative or other governmental or regulatory actions and decisions, economic conditions and similar factors in those states. For example, states we currently serve may bid out their Medicaid program through a request for proposal process. Our inability to continue to operate in any of the states in which we operate could harm our business.

Competition may limit our ability to increase penetration of the markets that we serve.

We compete for members principally on the basis of size and quality of provider networks, benefits provided and quality of service. We compete with numerous types of competitors, including other health plans and traditional state Medicaid programs that reimburse providers as care is provided. In addition, the impact of healthcare reform legislation and potential growth in our segment may attract new competitors.

Some of the health plans with which we compete have greater financial and other resources and offer a broader scope of products than we do. In addition, significant merger and acquisition activity has occurred in the managed care industry, as well as complementary industries, such as the hospital, physician, pharmaceutical, medical device and health information systems businesses. To the extent that competition intensifies in any market that we serve, as a result of industry consolidation or otherwise, our ability to retain or increase members and providers, or maintain or increase our revenue growth, pricing flexibility and control over medical cost trends may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with our provider networks, our profitability may be harmed.

Our profitability depends, in large part, upon our ability to contract at competitive prices with hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers. Our provider arrangements with our primary care physicians, specialists and hospitals generally may be canceled by either party without cause upon 90 to 120 days prior written notice. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to continue to renew our existing contracts or enter into new contracts on a timely basis or under favorable terms enabling us to service our members profitably. Healthcare providers with whom we contract may not properly manage the costs of services, maintain financial solvency or avoid disputes with other providers. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the provision of services to our members and our operations.

In any particular market, physicians and other healthcare providers could refuse to contract, demand higher payments, or take other actions that could result in higher medical costs or difficulty in meeting regulatory or accreditation requirements. In some markets, certain healthcare providers, particularly hospitals, physician/hospital organizations or multi-specialty physician groups, may have significant market positions or near monopolies that could result in diminished bargaining power on our part. In addition, accountable care organizations, practice management companies, which aggregate physician practices for administrative efficiency and marketing leverage, and other organizational structures that physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers choose may change the way in which these providers interact with us and may change the competitive landscape. Such organizations or groups of healthcare providers may compete directly with us, which could adversely affect our operations, and our results of operations, financial position and cash flows by impacting our relationships with these providers or affecting the way that we price our products and estimate our costs, which might require us to incur costs to change our operations. Provider networks may consolidate, resulting in a reduction in the competitive environment. In addition, if these providers refuse to contract with us, use their market position to negotiate contracts unfavorable to us or place us at a competitive disadvantage, our ability to market products or to be profitable in those areas could be materially and adversely affected.

Table of Contents

From time to time healthcare providers assert or threaten to assert claims seeking to terminate non-cancelable agreements due to alleged actions or inactions by us. In addition, we are aware that other managed care organizations have been subject to class action lawsuits by healthcare providers with respect to claim payment procedures, and we may be subject to similar lawsuits. Regardless of whether any lawsuits brought against us are successful or have merit, they will still be time-consuming and costly and could distract our management’s attention. As a result, we may incur significant expenses and may be unable to operate our business effectively. If we are unable to retain our current provider contract terms or enter into new provider contracts timely or on favorable terms, our profitability may be harmed.

We may be unable to attract, retain or effectively manage the succession of key personnel.

We are highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to operate and expand our business. We would be adversely impacted if we are unable to adequately plan for the succession of our executives and senior management. While we have succession plans in place for members of our executive and senior management team, these plans do not guarantee that the services of our executive and senior management team will continue to be available to us. Our ability to replace any departed members of our executive and senior management or other key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in the managed care and specialty services industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to operate and successfully expand a business such as ours. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these personnel. If we are unable to attract, retain and effectively manage the succession plans for key personnel, executives and senior management, our business and financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be harmed.

If we are unable to integrate and manage our information systems effectively, our operations could be disrupted.

Our operations depend significantly on effective information systems. The information gathered and processed by our information systems assists us in, among other things, monitoring utilization and other cost factors, processing provider claims, and providing data to our regulators. Our healthcare providers also depend upon our information systems for membership verifications, claims status and other information. Our information systems and applications require continual maintenance, upgrading and enhancement to meet our operational needs and regulatory requirements. We regularly upgrade and expand our information systems’ capabilities. If we experience difficulties with the transition to or from information systems or are unable to properly maintain or expand our information systems, we could suffer, among other things, operational disruptions, loss of existing members and difficulty in attracting new members, regulatory problems and increases in administrative expenses. In addition, our ability to integrate and manage our information systems may be impaired as the result of events outside our control, including acts of nature, such as earthquakes or fires, or acts of terrorists.

From time to time, we may become involved in costly and time-consuming litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which require significant attention from our management.

We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory actions relating to our business, including, without limitation, medical malpractice claims. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings are costly and time consuming and require significant attention from our management, and could therefore harm our business and financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

An impairment charge with respect to our recorded goodwill and intangible assets could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We periodically evaluate our goodwill and other intangible assets to determine whether all or a portion of their carrying values may be impaired, in which case a charge to earnings may be necessary. Changes in business strategy, government regulations or economic or market conditions have resulted and may result in impairments of our goodwill and other intangible assets at any time in the future. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on, among other things, legal factors, market conditions, and operational performance. For example, the non-renewal of our health plan contracts with the state in which they operate may be an indicator of impairment. If an event or events occur that would cause us to revise our estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets, such revision could result in a non-cash impairment charge that could have a material impact on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment occurs.

Table of Contents

If we fail to comply with applicable privacy, security, and data laws, regulations and standards, including with respect to third-party service providers that utilize sensitive personal information on our behalf, our business, reputation, results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

As part of our normal operations, we collect, process and retain confidential member information. We are subject to various federal and state laws and rules regarding the use and disclosure of confidential member information, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which require us to protect the privacy of medical records and safeguard personal health information we maintain and use. Certain of our businesses are also subject to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, which is a multifaceted security standard that is designed to protect credit card account data as mandated by payment card industry entities. Despite our best attempts to maintain adherence to information privacy and security best practices as well as compliance with applicable laws and rules, our facilities and systems, and those of our third party service providers, may be vulnerable to privacy or security breaches, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, misplaced or lost data including paper or electronic media, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. In the past, we have had data breaches resulting in disclosure of confidential or protected health information that have not resulted in any material financial loss or penalty to date. However, future data breaches could require us to expend significant resources to remediate any damage, interrupt our operations and damage our reputation, subject us to state or federal agency review and could also result in enforcement actions, material fines and penalties, litigation or other actions which could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In addition, HIPAA broadened the scope of fraud and abuse laws applicable to healthcare companies. HIPAA created civil penalties for, among other things, billing for medically unnecessary goods or services. HIPAA established new enforcement mechanisms to combat fraud and abuse, including civil and, in some instances, criminal penalties for failure to comply with specific standards relating to the privacy, security and electronic transmission of protected health information. The HITECH Act expanded the scope of these provisions by mandating individual notification in instances of breaches of protected health information, providing enhanced penalties for HIPAA violations, and granting enforcement authority to states’ Attorneys General in addition to the HHS Office for Civil Rights. It is possible that Congress may enact additional legislation in the future to increase penalties and to create a private right of action under HIPAA, which could entitle patients to seek monetary damages for violations of the privacy rules. In addition, HHS has announced that it will continue its audit program to assess HIPAA compliance efforts by covered entities with a focus on security risk assessments. Although we are not aware of HHS plans to audit any of our covered entities, an audit resulting in findings or allegations of noncompliance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Under HIPAA, health plans are required to have the capacity to accept and send all covered transactions in a standardized electronic format. Penalties can be imposed for failure to comply with these requirements. The transaction standards have been modified to version 5010 to prepare for the implementation of the ICD-10 coding system. While we have prepared for the transition to ICD-10 in October 2015, if unforeseen circumstances arise, it is possible that we could be exposed to investigations and allegations of noncompliance. In addition, if some providers continue to use ICD-9 codes on claims after October 1, 2015, we may have to reject such claims, which may lead to claim resubmissions, increased call volume and provider and customer dissatisfaction. Further, providers may use ICD-10 codes differently than they used ICD-9 codes in the past, which could result in higher costs and reimbursement levels, or lost revenues under risk adjustment. During the transition to ICD-10, certain claims processing and payment information we have historically used to establish our reserves may not be reliable or available in a timely manner. As a result, implementation of ICD 10 may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties with which we do business, including as a result of cyber attacks, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Information security risks have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct our operations, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign state agents. Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer systems and networks.

Table of Contents

Security breaches may arise from external or internal threats. External breaches include hacking personal information for financial gain, attempting to cause harm to our operations, or intending to obtain competitive information. We experience attempted external hacking or malicious attacks on a regular basis. We maintain a rigorous system of preventive and detective controls through our security programs; however, our prevention and detection controls may not prevent or identify all such attacks. Internal breaches may result from inappropriate security access to confidential information by rogue employees, consultants or third party service providers. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure or use of confidential member information, financial data, competitively sensitive information, or other proprietary data, whether by us or a third party, could have a material adverse effect on our business reputation, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

Consummation of the merger with Health Net is subject to receipt of regulatory approvals and certain other conditions and we cannot predict when or if such conditions will be satisfied or waived or if, in connection with the receipt of necessary approvals, regulators will impose conditions on us that have an adverse effect on our business.

Consummation of the merger with Health Net is subject to receipt of regulatory approvals and certain other conditions, including, among others:


•	the approval of the stockholders of both our Company and Health Net;


•	the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended;


•	certain filings or consents required for the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions under applicable state and foreign insurance and health care regulatory laws having been made or obtained;


•	the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the shares of our common stock to be issued to the stockholders of Health Net; and


•	certain other customary conditions.

We cannot provide any assurance that the merger will be completed, that there will not be a delay in the completion of the merger or that all or any of the anticipated benefits of the merger will be realized. Any delay could also, among other things, result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other negative effects associated with uncertainty about completion of the merger. In the event the merger agreement is terminated or the transaction is materially delayed for any reason, the price of our common stock may be impacted. Regulatory authorities reviewing the merger may refuse to permit the merger or may impose restrictions or conditions on the merger that may adversely affect the Company if the merger is completed.

The anticipated benefits of the merger with Health Net may not be realized fully and may take longer to realize than expected.

The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully combine the businesses of the Company and Health Net, which currently operate as independent public companies, and realize the anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings, innovation and operational efficiencies, from the combination. If we are unable to achieve these objectives within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected and the value of our common stock may be harmed.

The merger involves the integration of Health Net’s businesses with our existing business, which is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. We have not previously completed a transaction comparable in size or scope to the proposed merger. The integration of the two companies may result in material challenges, including, without limitation:


•	the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns and performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the devotion of management’s attention to the merger;


•	managing a larger combined company;


•	maintaining employee morale and retaining key management and other employees;


•	the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration process;


•	retaining existing business and operational relationships and attracting new business and operational relationships;


•	consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations;


•	coordinating geographically separate organizations;


•	unanticipated issues in integrating information technology, communications and other systems;


•	unanticipated changes in federal or state laws or regulations, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care Education Affordability Reconciliation Act and any regulations enacted thereunder; and


•	unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the merger.

Table of Contents

Many of these factors will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We and Health Net are currently permitted to conduct only limited planning regarding the integration of the two companies following the merger and have not yet determined the exact nature of how the businesses and operations of the two companies will be combined after the merger. The actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of the integration plan may not be realized.

Our financial results after the merger will depend on our ability to maintain our and Health Net’s business and operational relationships.

A substantial portion of each of our and Health Net’s revenues are received under contracts with states. Our success following the merger will depend in part on our ability to maintain these state contracts and other business and operational relationships, including those of Health Net. Health Net’s state contracts and other business and operational relationships may have termination or other rights that may be triggered by the merger, or the states or other business and operational relationships may decide not to renew their existing relationships with Health Net or, after the merger, with us. If Health Net (prior to the completion of the merger) and we (after the completion of the merger) are unable to maintain these contracts and other business and operational relationships, our financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially affected.

We will incur significant transaction and merger-related costs in connection with the merger.

We will incur significant costs in connection with the integration process. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses related to the merger (including financing of the merger), facilities and systems consolidation costs. We may incur additional costs to maintain employee morale and to retain key employees. We will also incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating integration plans. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of Health Net’s businesses. Although we expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, should allow us to more than offset incremental transaction and merger-related costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all. Additionally, as a result of the merger, rating agencies may take negative actions with regard to our credit ratings. This may increase our costs in connection with the financing of the merger.

Failure to complete the merger could impact our stock price and our future business and financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

If the merger is not completed or our financing for the transaction becomes unavailable, our ongoing business and financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially affected and we will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:


•	depending on the reasons leading to such termination we could be liable to Health Net for termination fees in connection with the termination of the merger agreement;


•	we could be responsible for the transaction costs relating to the merger, whether or not the merger is completed;


•	while the merger agreement is in force, we are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business, which may adversely affect our ability to execute certain of our business strategies;


•	the market price of our common stock could decline to the extent that the current market price reflects, and is positively affected by, a market assumption that the transactions contemplated by the merger will be completed; and


•	matters relating to the merger (including integration planning) may require substantial commitments of time and resources by our management, whether or not the merger is completed, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to us.

In addition, if the merger is not completed, we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from our providers, members and employees. We may also be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against us to perform our obligations under the merger agreement. If the merger is not completed, these risks may materialize and may materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as well as the price of our common stock.

Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the merger with Health Net.

The market price of the common stock of our company may decline as a result of the merger if, among other things, we are unable to achieve the expected growth in earnings, or if the operational cost savings estimates in connection with the integration of Health Net’s business with ours are not realized, or if the transaction costs related to the merger are greater than expected, or if the financing related to the transaction is on unfavorable terms. The market price also may decline if we do not achieve the perceived benefits of the merger as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by financial or industry analysts or if the effect of the merger on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows is not consistent with the expectations of financial or industry analysts.

The merger will substantially reduce the percentage ownership interests of our current stockholders; it may not be accretive and may cause dilution to our earnings per share, which may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

Our stockholders have the right to vote in the election of our Board of Directors and on certain other matters affecting the Company. If the merger is completed we will pay approximately $6.8 billion and Health Net’s stockholders are expected to hold approximately 29% of the common stock of the Company after the merger. As a result, if the merger is completed, our pre-merger stockholders will own a smaller proportion of our outstanding common stock than the proportion of our outstanding common stock they owned before the merger and, as a result, they will have less influence on our management and policies following the merger than they now have on our management and policies. We currently anticipate that the merger will be accretive to our earnings per share. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates which may materially change. We could also encounter additional transaction and integration-related costs or other factors such as the failure to realize all of the benefits anticipated in the merger, or unforeseen liabilities or other issues existing or arising with the business of Health Net or otherwise resulting from the merger. All of these factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the merger and cause a decrease in the price of our common stock.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Second Quarter 2015
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased ¹	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs²
April 1 – April 30, 2015	20,935	$	70.55	—	3,335,448
May 1 - May 31, 2015	18,232	67.69		—	3,335,448
June 1 - June 30, 2015	9,185	76.67		—	3,335,448
Total	48,352	$	70.64	—	3,335,448
⁽¹⁾ Shares acquired represent shares relinquished to the Company by certain employees for payment of taxes or option cost upon vesting of restricted stock units or option exercise. ⁽²⁾ Our Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program which allows for repurchases of up to a remaining amount of 3,335,448 shares. No duration has been placed on the repurchase program.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Exhibits.



EXHIBIT NUMBER			DESCRIPTION

2.1			Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 2, 2015, by and among Centene Corporation, Health Net, Inc. Chopin Merger Sub I, Inc., and Chopin Merger Sub II, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Centene Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2015.

10.1*			Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.

10.2			Voting Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, by and between Centene Corporation and Jay M. Gellert, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Centene Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2015.

12.1			Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

31.1			Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2			Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1			Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2			Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.1			XBRL Taxonomy Instance Document.

101.2			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.3			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.4			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.5			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.6			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

^*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized as of July 28, 2015.



	CENTENE CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ MICHAEL F. NEIDORFF
		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)



	By:	/s/ WILLIAM N. SCHEFFEL
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)



	By:	/s/ JEFFREY A. SCHWANEKE
		Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)