Fitch Rates $1B Maryland GOs 'AAA'; Outlook Stable

Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'AAA' rating to $1.036 billion in State of Maryland general obligation (GO) bonds, state and local facilities loan of 2016, first series (competitive).

The bonds are expected to be offered via competitive sale on or about June 8, 2016.

Additionally, Fitch affirms the long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of the State of Maryland and affirms the ratings on securities whose rating is linked to the IDR, as follows:

--$8.4 billion in outstanding state GO bonds, at 'AAA';

--$18 million in Maryland Transportation Authority parking lease revenue bonds, series 2005, at 'AA+', one notch below the IDR as appropriation-supported debt of the state.

Finally, Fitch upgrades the ratings on the following obligations:

--$114.6 million in Maryland Stadium Authority lease revenue bonds, to 'AA+' from 'AA'.

The upgrade to Maryland Stadium Authority lease revenue bonds, which carry the state's covenant to seek appropriation for lease payments sufficient to cover debt service, is based on application of Fitch's 'U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated April 18, 2016, which include more focused consideration of project factors in ratings for appropriation-backed debt; the bonds do not carry the additional risk features that Fitch identifies for rating more than one notch below the state's IDR under the revised criteria.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are general obligations to which the state's full faith and credit are pledged.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Maryland's 'AAA' rating reflects its broad, diverse and wealthy economy, extensive budget controls and sound financial operations, and strong management of debt. The state's economy has long benefited from proximity to the nation's capital, although exposure to federal budget cuts poses a greater uncertainty for Maryland given its large federal agency presence and associated private contracting. Fiscal management is very strong, with consensus-oriented long-term planning and multiple sources of flexibility including a consistently solid budgetary reserve and a demonstrated ability to adjust spending to address changing circumstances. Although liabilities are elevated for a state, they are moderate and carefully managed.

Economic Resource Base

Maryland's economy is wealthy, diverse and service oriented. The presence of the federal government in the neighboring District of Columbia has long served as an important anchor to Maryland's economy, with numerous federal agencies, military facilities and contractors supporting the state's solid economic performance. Trade and port activity are likewise significant given the prominence of Baltimore. Economic expansion continues and in fact has accelerated in recent years, despite the earlier drag posed by federal sequestration.

Revenue Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment

Maryland's revenue growth is expected to be in line with or above the level of U.S. economic growth, given the state's solid economic base, service-oriented economy and broad tax resources. Maryland retains unlimited authority to raise operating revenues. Cyclical revenue performance is a risk given both the prominence of personal income tax (PIT) in overall state revenues and the state's exposure to changes in federal spending. However, overall growth prospects for revenues remain strong.

Expenditure Framework: 'aaa' factor assessment

Maryland has a solid ability to change its spending commitments in response to shifting economic and revenue circumstances. Spending pressures from education and Medicaid, among other needs, have been notable in recent years. Carrying costs for liabilities are above the median for states, partly given the state's extensive role in funding education, including capital and pensions.

Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa' factor assessment

The burden of net tax-supported debt and unfunded pensions is elevated for a state, but only a moderate burden in relation to the state's resource base. Debt is comprehensively managed. Pensions have been a more significant burden, but the state has implemented multiple reforms to benefits and contribution policies to improve pension sustainability and accelerate funded ratio improvement over time.

Operating Performance: 'aaa' factor assessment

Financial resilience is very strong, with a well-funded budgetary reserve and a willingness to trim spending commitments and increase revenues in response to changing circumstances. Multi-year forecasting and planning are disciplined, including measuring actual performance against structural targets. Consensus-oriented practices ensure steady management of budgetary conditions and liabilities.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

CONTINUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICES: Sound fiscal management practices and the consistent maintenance of fiscal flexibility (including through maintaining budgetary reserves) are expected to provide the state with the ability to respond to near-term economic or fiscal uncertainties in a manner consistent with the 'AAA' rating.

CREDIT PROFILE

Maryland benefits from a diverse, wealthy economy centered on the Washington, D.C.-Baltimore metropolitan area. Services are the dominant sector, including professional and business services, education and health, and government. Trade and transportation are also significant, with notable port activity centered on Baltimore. The state's federal workforce is very large, including multiple federal agencies, research institutions and military facilities, and its importance has grown with several rounds of military consolidations undertaken in recent decades.

The state has generally enjoyed high personal income and solid labor market characteristics, including an unemployment rate consistently below the nation's. Maryland was not spared the impact of the last recession; however, the drop-off was less severe and the initial recovery was faster in Maryland compared to the nation. State performance during much of the recovery, however, has been slower than national averages, driven in part by federal sequestration and its impact on the state's large federal workforce. Recent economic gains have accelerated, with job gains exceeding the nation's and quarterly personal income growth matching national levels.

Revenue Framework

Maryland's revenue framework is very diverse. Personal income is the largest source of general revenues, with sales and corporate income taxes also significant. Transportation receipts are similarly diverse and dedicated to transportation needs. The state also levies a statewide property tax to support general obligation bonds.

The state's wealthy, service-oriented economy is the basis for a revenue growth profile that, while subject to economic cyclicality, is likely to grow faster than state medians over time. Economic sensitivity is most notable in the component of personal income taxes linked to capital gains.

The state has an unlimited legal ability to raise revenues. The state has shown a willingness to change tax policy, including implementing rate increases, in response to changing budgetary circumstances.

Expenditure Framework

Spending commitments are dominated by education and social services. Education spending for K-12, provided via transfers to counties, expanded significantly a decade ago as the state sought to address concerns regarding school funding adequacy. Education spending also includes amortization contributions for local teacher retirement liabilities, capital support, and a large and growing network of higher education institutions. Social services, including for Medicaid, are also a large and growing component of the state's budget.

Consistent with most states, spending is expected to be in line with to marginally above expected revenue growth, driven by social services spending needs.

The state has a solid ability to cut spending. Carrying costs for liabilities, including debt service and pension contributions, are higher than the median for states but remain moderate.

Long-Term Liability Burden

On a combined basis, net tax-supported debt and pension liabilities attributable to the state as of Fitch's 2015 state pension update are above average for a state, measuring 11% of personal income, compared to a statewide median of 5.8%. Tax-supported debt, which Fitch calculates at $12.8 billion as of March 31, 2016, measures 3.8% of personal income. Most debt is constitutionally required to amortize in 15 years, and centralized debt planning and issuance are additional credit strengths. Debt affordability guidelines include holding tax-supported debt at or below 4% of personal income.

Pensions are a comparative credit weakness in Maryland, although the state has taken repeated action since 2011 to reform benefits and contributions to strengthen funding. Reforms have included lower benefit accruals, higher service requirements, a phased-in decline in the discount rate, ending (as of fiscal 2017) a contribution methodology that had consistently left actual contributions below actuarial calculations and replacing it with full actuarial contributions, and appropriating supplemental contributions.

Fitch calculates pension liabilities attributable to the state and adjusted for a 7% return to equal approximately $23.4 billion. Given the changes implemented to date, Fitch views the prospects for funding improvement to be increased assuming investment performance matches expectations. Additionally, changes in 2011 to other post-employment benefits are estimated to have reduced the state's OPEB liability approximately 40% as measured at the time; the total unfunded OPEB liability as of June 30, 2015 is $9.4 billion.

Operating Performance

Maryland's financial resilience is exceptionally strong. Historically the state has relied on spending cuts, revenue increases and the use of non-recurring resources, including draws from the revenue stabilization account (RSA--the state's rainy day fund) when confronted with budgetary weakness.

The state has disciplined consensus revenue forecasting and monitoring that identify material changes in the direction of state economic and revenue performance. The state's Board of Public Works, which includes the Governor, Comptroller and Treasurer, has the power to trim spending during the year in response to budgetary weakness, and demonstrated this ability repeatedly during the last downturn.

The state routinely budgets to maintain flexibility both in the form of a general fund unencumbered balance and the separate RSA balance, the latter of which has been funded at or near the statutory target of 5% of general fund revenues, including through most of the last downturn. The RSA balance has risen in step with the budget in recent years, and is forecast at $832 million (5.1% of general fund revenues) in fiscal 2016. The RSA balance is forecast to rise to $1 billion in fiscal 2017.

Recent budgetary performance has been steady. The outlook for fiscal 2016 general fund revenues, at $16.4 billion, is slightly above the level assumed in the adopted budget. Recent collections year-to-date, though above prior year levels, have been below forecast expectations largely due to the non-withholding component of the personal income tax. At present, the state forecasts a general fund ending balance of $551 million (3.4% of general fund revenues).

The state's forecast assumes fiscal 2017 general fund revenues rising 3.5%, to $17 billion. Appropriations grow 1.5%, to $17.2 billion, with a forecast ending balance of $365 million (2.1% of general fund revenues).

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the applicable criteria specified below, this action was informed by information from Lumesis and InvestorTools.

Applicable Criteria

Rating Public-Sector Counterparty Obligations in PPP Transactions (pub. 15 Jan 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=876726

U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=879478

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1005182

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1005182

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/creditdesk/PolicyRegulation.faces?context=2&detail=31

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Contacts:

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Douglas Offerman
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0889
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Eric Kim
Director
+1-212-908-0241
or
Committee Chairperson
Karen Krop
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0661
or
Media Relations:
Elizabeth Fogerty, +1 212-908-0526
elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.