sui09300910q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.
or
[ ] TRANSITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 1-12616
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Maryland |
|
38-2730780 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
27777 Franklin Rd. |
|
|
Suite 200 |
|
|
Southfield, Michigan |
|
48034 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [ ] |
Accelerated filer [ X ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding
as of September 30, 2009: 18,794,736
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
INDEX
|
|
Pages |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets ─ September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations ─ Periods Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss ─ Periods Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
5 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit ─ Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
5 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ─ Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
6 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7 |
Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
28 |
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
44 |
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures
|
45 |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings
|
46 |
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors
|
46 |
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
46 |
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
46 |
Item 6. |
Exhibits
|
47 |
|
Signatures
|
48 |
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of manufactured homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 90,000 shares authorized (September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 20,597 and 20,313 shares issued respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 1,802 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sun Communities, Inc. stockholders' deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from real property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental home operating and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative - real property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative - home sales and rentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and equity loss from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for state income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amounts attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Officer's Notes |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Total Sun Communities Stockholders' Deficit |
|
|
Non-controlling Interest |
|
|
Total Stock-holders' Deficit |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
459,847 |
|
|
$ |
(8,334 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,851 |
) |
|
$ |
(445,147 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,882 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(59,882 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
Stock-based compensation - amortization and forfeitures |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,417 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,417 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(4,107 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Repayment of officer's notes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
Cash distributions declared of $1.89 per share |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,116 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,116 |
) |
|
|
(4,133 |
) |
|
|
(39,249 |
) |
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
463,608 |
|
|
$ |
(5,163 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(483,666 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,600 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,723 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,734 |
) |
|
$ |
(95,457 |
) |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from land dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of other assets and depreciated homes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on valuation of derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in notes receivables from financed sales of inventory homes, net of repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventory, other assets and other receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds related to dispositions of land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds related to disposition of other assets and depreciated homes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of notes receivable and officer's notes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance (redemption) of common stock and OP units, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on notes payable and other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to stockholders and OP unit holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest on mandatorily redeemable debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
These unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Sun Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and all majority-owned or wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries, including Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), SunChamp LLC (“SunChamp”), and Sun Home Services, Inc.
(“SHS”), have been prepared pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on March 13, 2009, as amended on March 30, 2009 (the “2008 Annual Report”).
Reference in this report to Sun Communities, Inc., “we”, “our” and “us” and the “Company” refer to Sun Communities, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
We completed the sale of our cable television services business during the third quarter ended September 30, 2009. The cable television services business has been classified and presented as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. See Note 2 for additional information.
The following Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements present interim disclosures as required by the SEC. These statements have been prepared on a basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our 2008 Annual Report, with the exception of the impact of our adoption in the first quarter of 2009 of the
following accounting standards: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”, which is now included within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidation; and FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”, which is included within ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 17 for further information on our adoption of these accounting standards.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods’ financial statements in order to conform to current period presentation.
2. Discontinued Operations
We had investments in certain land improvements and equipment that provided cable television services to certain communities within the Real Property Operations segment. In December 2008, we determined that the cable television assets could not provide the necessary return on investment to justify the capital investment required
to keep up with the technological advances in the offered product. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we announced our intention to exit the cable television service business and recorded a $4.1 million impairment charge on the cable television assets. This impairment charge was recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 360, Plant Property and Equipment.
We completed the sale of the cable television services business during the third quarter ended September 30, 2009. Cash proceeds from this sale were $0.3 million, resulting in a net gain on sale of $0.2 million, which is recorded in loss from discontinued operations. In accordance with ASC Topic 205, Presentation of Financial
Statements, the cable television service business has been presented as a discontinued operation in the Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods presented.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. |
Discontinued Operations, continued |
The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information of the discontinued operation (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth certain information regarding investment property (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental homes and improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land held for future development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements and buildings consist primarily of infrastructure, roads, landscaping, clubhouses, maintenance buildings and amenities.
On September 21, 2009, a flood caused substantial damage to our property, Countryside Village of Atlanta, located in Lawrenceville, Georgia. We are still in the preliminary stages of assessing the damage to our property. We have comprehensive insurance coverage for both property damage and business interruption, subject
to deductibles and certain limitations. We believe the cost of the damage sustained from the flooding will be in excess of our insurance deductible. We have recorded a charge of $0.8 million associated with the flooding. This charge represents our deductible, net of expected insurance recoveries for the replacement of assets that exceed the net book value of assets damaged in the flood.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. |
Secured Borrowing and Collateralized Receivables |
We have completed various transactions involving our installment notes since the third quarter of fiscal 2008. We have received a total of $49.2 million of cash proceeds in exchange for relinquishing our right, title and interest in the installment notes. We have no further obligations or rights with respect to the control, management,
administration, servicing, or collection of the installment notes.
However, we are subject to certain recourse provisions requiring us to purchase the underlying homes collateralizing such notes, in the event of a note default and subsequent repossession of the home. The recourse provisions are considered to be a form of continuing involvement, and we have recorded these transactions as a transfer
of financial assets in accordance with ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing.
In the event of note default, and subsequent repossession of a manufactured home, the terms of the agreement require us to repurchase the manufactured home. Default is defined as the failure to repay the installment note according to contractual terms. The repurchase price is calculated as a percentage of the outstanding principal balance
of the installment note, plus any outstanding late fees, accrued interest, legal fees and escrow advances associated with the installment note. The percentage used to determine the repurchase price of the outstanding principal balance on the installment note is based on the number of payments made on the note. In general, the repurchase price is determined as follows:
Number of Payments |
|
Recourse % |
|
|
|
Greater than 15 but less than 64 |
|
90% |
|
|
|
The transferred assets have been classified as collateralized receivables in Notes and Other Receivables (see Note 5) and the cash proceeds received from these transactions have been classified as a secured borrowing in Debt (see Note 7) within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net balance of the collateralized receivables
was $44.9 million and $26.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The collateralized receivables are presented net of allowance for losses of $0.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The outstanding balance on the secured borrowing was $45.0 million and $26.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The balances of the collateralized receivables and secured borrowings fluctuate. The balances increase as additional installment notes are transferred and exchanged for cash proceeds. The balances are reduced as the related installment notes are collected from the customers, or as the underlying collateral is repurchased. The
change in the aggregate gross principal balance of the collateralized receivables is as follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Financed sales of manufactured homes |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments and payoffs from our customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
The collateralized receivables earn interest income and the secured borrowings accrue borrowing costs at the same interest rates. The amount of interest income and expense recognized was $1.2 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount of interest
income and expense recognized was $2.8 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
For federal tax purposes, we treat these transfers of collateralized receivables as sales of financial assets.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. |
Notes and Other Receivables |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding notes and other receivables (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Installment notes receivable on manufactured homes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized receivables, net (see Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes and other receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment Notes Receivable on Manufactured Homes
The installment notes of $16.4 million and $21.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are collateralized by manufactured homes. The installment notes are presented net of allowance for losses of $0.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The installment notes represent financing provided
by us to purchasers of manufactured homes generally located in our communities. The installment notes receivable have interest payable monthly at a net weighted average interest rate and a maturity of 7.8 percent and 12.8 years and 7.6 percent and 13.8 years at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Collateralized Receivables
We have completed various transactions involving our installment notes since the third quarter of fiscal 2008. We have received a total of $49.2 million of cash proceeds in exchange for relinquishing our right, title and interest in the installment notes. These transactions were recorded as a transfer of financial assets. The transferred
assets have been classified as collateralized receivables with a net balance of $44.9 million and $26.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The collateralized receivables are presented net of allowance for losses of $0.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The collateralized receivables have interest payable monthly at a weighted average interest rate and maturity of 10.8 percent and 13.8 years and 10.1 percent and 14.0 years, as of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. See Note 4 for additional information.
Allowance for Losses for Collateralized and Installment Notes Receivable
We are generally able to recover our investment in uncollectible notes receivable by repurchasing the homes that collateralized these notes receivables, and then selling or leasing these homes to potential residents in our communities. Although our experience supports a high recovery rate for repossessed homes, we believe there is some
degree of uncertainty about recoverability of our investment in these repossessed homes. We have established a loan loss reserve that estimates our unrecoverable costs associated with these repossessed homes. We estimate our unrecoverable costs to be the repurchase price plus repair costs that exceed the estimated selling price of the home being repossessed. A historical average of this excess cost is calculated based on prior repossessions and applied to our estimated annual
future repossessions to create the allowance for installment notes and collateralized receivables. The allowance for losses for collateralized and installment notes receivable was $0.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. |
Notes and Other Receivables, continued |
Other Receivables
Other receivables were comprised of amounts due from residents of $1.6 million (net of allowance of $0.2 million), home sale proceeds of $3.4 million, an employee loan of $0.5 million, insurance receivables of $0.4 million, and rebates and other receivables of $2.6 million as of September 30, 2009. Other receivables were comprised
of amounts due from residents of $1.6 million (net of allowance of $0.3 million), home sale proceeds of $3.7 million, an employee loan of $0.5 million, insurance receivables of $0.3 million, and rebates and other receivables of $4.0 million as of December 31, 2008.
Officer’s Notes
Officer’s notes, presented as a portion of the stockholders’ deficit in the balance sheet, are 10 year, LIBOR + 1.75% notes, with a minimum and maximum interest rate of 6% and 9%, respectively. The following table sets forth certain information regarding officer’s notes as of September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 (in thousands except for shares and units):
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by |
|
Promissory Notes |
|
Outstanding Principal Balance |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Common OP Units |
|
|
Outstanding Principal Balance |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Common OP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The officer’s personal liability on the secured promissory notes is limited to all accrued interest on such notes plus fifty percent of the deficiency, if any, after application of the proceeds from the sale of the secured shares and/or the secured units to the then outstanding principal balance of the promissory notes. The
value of secured shares and secured OP Units total approximately $4.7 million based on the closing price of our shares on the New York Stock Exchange of $21.52 as of September 30, 2009. The unsecured notes are fully recourse to the officer.
Total interest received was $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Total interest received was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The reduction in the aggregate principal balance of these notes was $3.2 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The notes are due in two remaining installments on December 31, 2009 and 2010.
6. |
Investment in Affiliates |
In October 2003, we purchased 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Origen Financial, Inc. (“Origen”). We own approximately 19 percent of Origen as of September 30, 2009, and our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2009, our investment in Origen had a market value of
approximately $8.0 million based on a quoted market closing price of $1.60 per share from the “Pink Sheet Electronic OTC Trading System”.
We recorded our estimated equity allocation of the reported losses from Origen of $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We recorded equity losses from Origen of $1.5 million and $14.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. These
equity losses included other than temporary impairment charges of $1.3 million and $8.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
6. |
Investment in Affiliates, continued |
Summarized consolidated financial information of Origen at September 30, 2009 and 2008 is presented below before elimination of inter-company transactions (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2008, we entered into an agreement with four unrelated companies (“Members”) to form a new limited liability company, Origen Financial Services, LLC (the “LLC”). We contributed cash of $0.5 million toward the formation of the limited liability company. The LLC purchased the origination
platform of Origen. The purpose of the venture is to originate manufactured housing installment contracts for its Members thereby eliminating the need for us to become licensed to originate loans in each of the 18 states in which we do business. We own 25.0 percent of the LLC as of September 30, 2009, and the investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. We recorded an insignificant amount of income (loss) associated with our equity allocation of the LLC’s financial
results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recorded losses of $0.1 million associated with our equity allocation of the LLC’s financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.Our equity allocation of the LLC’s financial results was insignificant for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
7. |
Debt and Lines of Credit |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding debt (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Collateralized term loans - CMBS, due July 1, 2011-2016 interest at 4.9-5.3% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized term loans - FNMA, due May 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015, interest at 3.2 – 5.2% and 4.5 - 5.2% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred OP Units, redeemable at various dates from December 1, 2009 through January 5, 2014, average interest at 6.8% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowing, maturing at various dates from April 30, 2010 through November 24, 2031, average interest at 10.8% and 10.1% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively (see Note 4). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes, other, maturing at various dates from April 1, 2012 through May 1, 2017, average interest at 5.3% and 5.4% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. |
Debt and Lines of Credit, continued |
Collateralized Term Loans
The collateralized term loans totaling $473.3 million as of September 30, 2009, are secured by 87 properties comprising of 31,211 sites representing approximately $543.4 million of net book value.
We recently exercised our option to extend the due date of approximately $152.4 million of secured, variable rate borrowings to May 1, 2014. In connection with this extension, the lender increased the facility fee resulting in an increase of the effective interest rate on the borrowings, which resulted in higher interest expense. We do
not believe that the lender had the right to increase the facility fee and have reserved all of our rights with respect to the increased fee. We are considering all of our available remedies to challenge the validity of the increased fee.
Preferred OP Units
Our Operating Partnership had $13.7 million of Series B-3 Preferred OP Units that were redeemable at various dates from December 1, 2009 through January 1, 2011. In October 2008, our Operating Partnership completed a three year extension on the redemption dates for $11.9 million of these units; the remaining $1.8 million of these
units mature in accordance with the original agreement.
In January 2009, we redeemed $0.5 million of the $1.8 million of the Series B-3 Preferred OP Units.
Secured Borrowing
Since the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we have completed various transactions involving our installment notes. These transactions were recorded as a transfer of financial assets, and the cash proceeds related to these transactions were recorded as a secured borrowing. See Note 4 for additional information regarding
our collateralized receivables and secured borrowing transactions.
Mortgage Notes
The mortgage notes totaling $213.8 million as of September 30, 2009, are collateralized by 19 communities comprising of 6,387 sites representing approximately $184.4 million of net book value.
During June 2009, we completed a financing of $18.5 million with Bank of America. The loan has a three year term. The interest rate is 400 basis points over LIBOR, with a minimum rate of 5.0 percent (effective rate 5.0 percent at September 30, 2009). Proceeds of $11.2 million were used to repay mortgage notes that matured in June 2009.
The remaining proceeds were used to pay down our unsecured line of credit.
Lines of Credit
We have an unsecured revolving line of credit facility with a maximum borrowing capacity of $115.0 million, subject to certain borrowing base calculations. The outstanding balance on the line of credit as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $84.3 million and $85.8 million, respectively. In addition, $3.3 million of availability
was used to back standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Borrowings under the line of credit bear an interest rate of LIBOR plus 165 basis points, or prime plus 40 basis points at our option. Prime means for any month, the prevailing “prime rate” as quoted in the Wall Street Journal on last day of such calendar month. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings was 1.9 percent as of September 30, 2009. The borrowings
under the line of credit mature October 1, 2011, assuming the election of a one year extension that is available at our discretion. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $27.4 million and $25.9 million, respectively, were available to be drawn under the facility based on the calculation of the borrowing base at each date.
In March 2009, we entered into a $10.0 million manufactured home floor plan facility. The floor plan facility has a committed term of one year; thereafter, advances are discretionary and terms are subject to change. The interest rate is 100 basis points over the greater of prime or 6.0 percent (effective rate 7.0 percent at September 30,
2009). The outstanding balance as of September 30, 2009 was $4.6 million.
Our previous $40.0 million floor plan facility matured on March 1, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance on the floor plan was $4.6 million.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. |
Debt and Lines of Credit, continued |
As of September 30, 2009, the total of maturities and amortization of debt and lines of credit during the next five years, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Maturities and Amortization By Year |
|
|
|
Total Due |
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most restrictive of our debt agreements place limitations on secured and unsecured borrowings and contain minimum debt service coverage, leverage, distribution and net worth requirements. As of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all covenants.
8. |
Share-Based Compensation |
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on July 29, 2009, the stockholders approved the Sun Communities, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (“2009 Equity Plan”). The 2009 Equity Plan had been adopted by the Board and was effective upon approval by our stockholders. The 2009 Equity Plan replaced the Sun Communities, Inc.
Stock Option Plan adopted in 1993, amended and restated in 1996 and 2000. The 2009 Equity Plan terminates automatically July 29, 2019. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2009 Equity Plan is 950,000 shares.
The purpose of the 2009 Equity Plan was to provide certain key employees additional incentive to promote our financial success and to provide an incentive which we may use to induce able persons to enter into or remain in the employment of the Company or a Subsidiary by providing such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase his or
her direct proprietary interest in the operations and future of the Company.
On July 29, 2009, we issued 80,000 shares of restricted stock to our officers under the 2009 Equity Plan. The awards vest ratably over a six year period beginning on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, and have a fair value of $14.95 per share. The fair value was determined by using the closing share price of our common
stock on the date the grant was issued.
Additionally, on July 29, 2009, we issued 10,500 director options under our 2004 Non-Employee Director Option Plan. The weighted average fair value of the options issued is estimated on the date of the grant using the Binomial (lattice) option pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions used for the grants
in the period indicated:
|
|
July 2009 Award |
Estimated fair value per share of options granted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Common stock price volatility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option terms (in years) |
|
|
|
|
In September 2009, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC. The Form S-8 registered the remaining 870,000 that are issuable under the 2009 Equity Plan. The Form S-8 also registered 100,000 shares of common stock that are issuable under the 2004 Non-Employee Director Option Plan.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In November 2004, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. We have 400,000 common shares remaining in the repurchase program. No common shares were repurchased during 2009 or 2008. There is no expiration date specified for the buyback program.
In March 2009, our Operating Partnership issued 110,444 Common OP Units to Water Oak, Ltd. During 2009, holders of Common OP Units converted 119,806 units to common stock.
The vesting requirements for 67,598 restricted shares granted to our employees were satisfied during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Our shelf registration for up to $300.0 million of common stock, preferred stock and debt securities expired December 31, 2008. In March 2009, we filed a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC to replace the previous shelf registration for a proposed offering of up to $300.0 million of our common stock, preferred
stock and debt securities. The SEC declared the new shelf registration effective in May 2009.
We registered 1.6 million shares of common stock for sale pursuant to a sales agreement that we entered into with Brinson Patrick Securities Corporation. Sales under the agreement commenced on August 27, 2009 and 100,000 shares of common stock were sold as of September 30, 2009. The shares of common stock were sold at the prevailing market
price of our common stock at the time of each sale with a weighted average sale price of $19.98. We received net proceeds of approximately $1.9 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from the sales of these shares of common stock. The proceeds were used to pay down our unsecured line of credit.
The components of other income are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposition of assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Our consolidated operations can be segmented into Real Property Operations and Home Sales and Rentals. Transactions between our segments are recorded at cost. Seasonal recreational vehicle revenue is included in Real Property Operations’ revenues and is approximately $5.5 million annually. This seasonal revenue is recognized
approximately 50% in the first quarter, 6.5% in both the second and third quarters and 37% in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.
A presentation of segment financial information is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses/Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income/gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to arrive at net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) from affiliates, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. |
Segment Reporting, continued |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses/Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income/gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to arrive at net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) from affiliates, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Real Property Operations |
|
|
Home Sales and Home Rentals |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of manufactured homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
12. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense, manage exposure to interest rate movements, and minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on future cash flows. Interest rate swaps and caps are used to accomplish this objective. We require hedging derivative instruments
to be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. We formally designate any instrument that meets these hedging criteria as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract.
As of September 30, 2009, we had four derivative contracts consisting of three interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $70.0 million and an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $152.4 million. We generally employ derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to
fixed rate debt and to cap the maximum interest rate on certain variable rate borrowings. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The following table provides the terms of our interest rate derivative contracts that were in effect as of September 30, 2009:
Type |
Purpose |
Effective Date |
Maturity Date |
Notional (in millions) |
Based on |
Variable Rate |
Fixed Rate |
Spread |
Effective Fixed Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5875% |
|
|
|
Swap |
Floating to Fixed Rate |
01/02/09 |
01/02/14 |
20.0 |
3 Month LIBOR |
0.5950% |
2.1450% |
2.0000% |
4.1450% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2438% |
|
|
|
Cap |
Cap Floating Rate |
04/28/09 |
05/01/12 |
152.4 |
3 Month LIBOR |
0.6013% |
11.0000% |
0.0000% |
N/A |
Our financial derivative instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and the effective portion of the gain or loss on such hedges are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent that the hedging relationship is not effective, the ineffective portion is
recorded in interest expense. Hedges that received designated hedge accounting treatment are evaluated for effectiveness at the time that they are designated as well as through the hedging period.
In accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, we have recorded the fair value of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the balance sheet. See Note 16 for information on the determination of fair value for the derivative instruments. The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative
instruments included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps and cap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These valuation adjustments will only be realized under certain situations. For example, if we terminate the swaps prior to maturity or if the derivatives fail to qualify for hedge accounting, then we would need to amortize amounts currently included in other comprehensive loss into interest expense over the terms of the derivative contracts. We
do not intend to terminate the swaps prior to maturity and, therefore, the net of valuation adjustments through the various maturity dates will approximate zero, unless the derivatives fail to qualify for hedge accounting.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
12. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, continued |
Our hedges were highly effective and had minimal effect on income. The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 as recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
Derivatives in ASC Topic 815 cash flow hedging |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps and cap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 as recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
Derivatives in ASC Topic 815 cash flow hedging |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps and cap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to provide ongoing collateralization on derivative instruments in a liability position. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had collateral deposits recorded in other assets of $3.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) as defined under Section 856(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Code”), as amended. In order for us to qualify as a REIT, at least ninety-five percent (95%) of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources. In addition,
a REIT must distribute at least ninety percent (90%) of its REIT ordinary taxable income to its stockholders.
Qualification as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely
within our control. In addition, frequent changes occur in the area of REIT taxation which requires us to continually monitor our tax status. We analyzed the various REIT tests and confirmed that we continued to qualify as a REIT for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on the ordinary taxable income we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, our taxable income will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates (including any applicable
alternative minimum tax). Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local income taxes and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
13. |
Income Taxes, continued |
SHS, our taxable REIT subsidiary, is subject to U.S. federal income taxes. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the bases of such assets and liabilities as measured by tax laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced,
if necessary, by a valuation allowance to the amount where realization is more likely than not assured after considering all available evidence. Our temporary differences primarily relate to net operating loss carryforwards and depreciation. A federal deferred tax asset of $1.0 million is included in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
We had no unrecognized tax benefits as defined by ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008. We expect no significant increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within one year of September 30, 2009.
We classify certain state taxes as income taxes for financial reporting purposes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. We record the Michigan Business Tax and Texas Margin Tax as income taxes in our financial statements. The provision for state income taxes was approximately $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recorded a provision for state income taxes of approximately $0.4 million and a nominal amount in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
A deferred tax liability is included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets of $0.5 million, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, in relation to the Michigan Business Tax. No deferred tax liability is recorded in relation to the Texas Margin Tax as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. Federal, State and Local, examinations
by tax authorities before 2005.
Our policy is to report income tax penalties and income tax related interest expense as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalty associated with any unrecognized income tax benefit or provision was accrued, nor was any income tax related interest or penalty recognized during the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
14. |
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements |
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51”, which is included within ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The updated guidance in ASC Topic 810 nullified the consolidation guidance in ASC Topic 974. The updated guidance
within ASC Topic 810 was effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which apply retrospectively. We applied the updated provisions of ASC Topic 810 beginning January 1, 2009. ASC Topic 810 required that losses be allocated to the noncontrolling interest even when such allocation results in a deficit balance, reducing the losses attributed to the controlling
interest.
Certain partners in our consolidated subsidiaries receive dividend distributions on a 1:1 ratio to the dividend distributions provided to common shareholders. During fiscal year 2008, these partners’ net equity position declined below zero due to accumulated distributions in excess of allocated accumulated earnings (losses). Prior
to the adoption of the updated guidance within ASC Topic 810, we would have been required to record the deficit balance to the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a charge to noncontrolling interest dividend distributions.
Additionally, the noncontrolling interests in our consolidated partnerships receive an allocation of their proportionate share of these consolidated subsidiaries’ net losses, even when the allocation results in a deficit balance, reducing the losses attributed to the controlling interest. The dividend distributions and the noncontrolling
interests’ proportionate share of net losses were recorded as a deficit balance to the equity position of the noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009.
The provisions of ASC Topic 810 require that if an entity’s results are different due to the adoption of the new guidance that the entity must disclose selected pro forma financial information as if the deficit balance was recorded as a charge to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
14. |
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, continued |
Our proforma results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest dividend distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have outstanding stock options and unvested restricted shares, and our Operating Partnership has Common OP Units, and convertible Preferred OP Units, which if converted or exercised, may impact dilution. On January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1, which is included within ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, which addressed
whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions were participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, needed to be included in earnings allocation in computing basic earnings per share under the two-class method. Our unvested restricted shares qualified as participating securities as defined by ASC Topic 260. We adjusted our calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) to conform to the updated guidance provided in ASC Topic 260, which also required retrospective
application for all periods presented. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 260 did not affect per share amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, because we reported net losses in these periods. Loss per share for the year may not equal the sum of the fiscal quarters’ loss per share due to changes in basic and diluted shares outstanding.
Computations of basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations were as follows (in thousands, expect per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations available to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
15. |
Loss Per Share, continued |
We excluded securities from the computation of diluted EPS because the inclusion of these securities would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. The following table presents the number of outstanding potentially dilutive securities that were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as of September 30, 2009 and
2008 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred OP Units |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
The figures above represent the total number of potentially dilutive securities, and do not reflect the incremental impact to the number of diluted weighted average shares outstanding that would be computed if the impact to us had been dilutive to the calculation of earnings (loss) per share available to common stockholders.
16. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, derivative instruments, and debt. We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The following methods and assumptions
were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Derivative Instruments
The derivative instruments held by us are interest rate swaps and cap agreements for which quoted market prices are indirectly available. For those derivatives, we use model-derived valuations in which all observable inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets provided by brokers or dealers to determine the fair
values of derivative instruments on a recurring basis.
Installment Notes on Manufactured Homes
The net carrying value of the installment notes on manufactured homes reasonably estimates the fair value of the underlying collateral (manufactured home) which would be placed into service for use in our Rental Program.
Long Term Debt and Lines of Credit
The fair value of long term debt (excluding the secured borrowing) is based on the estimates of management and on rates currently quoted and rates currently prevailing for comparable loans and instruments of comparable maturities.
Collateralized Receivables and Secured Borrowing
The fair value of these financial instruments offset each other as our collateralized receivables represent a transfer of financial assets and the cash proceeds received from these transactions have been classified as a secured borrowing in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair market values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
16. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, continued |
The table below sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that required disclosure of their fair values on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009. The table presents the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2009 that were measured using the valuation techniques described above.
The table does not include financial instruments with maturities less than one year because the carrying values associated with these instruments approximate fair value.
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment notes on manufactured homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt (excluding secured borrowing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires the use of observable market data, when available, and prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value in the following categories:
Level 1—Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all observable inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.
Level 3—Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable, including assumptions developed by us.
The table below sets forth, by level, our financial assets and liabilities that were required to be carried at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
17. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2009
In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 which provided for a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” which is included within ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of ASC Topic 820 as it pertains to non-financial assets and liabilities did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position as we have not elected the fair value option for any or our non-financial assets or liabilities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”, which is included within ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 805 significantly changed the accounting for business combinations. Under ASC Topic 805, an acquiring entity is required to recognize
all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. ASC Topic 805 changed the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition related items and also included a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. ASC Topic 805 was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We will apply ASC Topic 805 prospectively
to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009.
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51”, which is included within ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 810 established new standards that govern the accounting for and reporting of noncontrolling interests
in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries and the loss of control of subsidiaries. Also, the updates to ASC Topic 810 required that: (1) noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest, be reported as part of equity in the Consolidated Financial Statements; (2) losses be allocated to the noncontrolling interest even when such allocation might result in a deficit balance, reducing the losses attributed to the controlling interest; (3) changes in ownership interests be treated as equity
transactions if control is maintained; (4) upon a loss of control, any gain or loss on the interest sold be recognized in earnings; and (5) the noncontrolling interest’s share be recorded at the fair value of net assets acquired, plus its share of goodwill. The updates to ASC Topic 810 were effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which apply retrospectively.
The adoption of the updated guidance within ASC Topic 810 impacted the presentation of noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. See Note 14 for additional information regarding the impact of adopting the updated guidance within ASC Topic 810 on our results of operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which is included within ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 815 provided for enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivatives and how and where
those derivatives and related hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. The statement was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Because the updated guidance within ASC Topic 815 impacted the disclosure requirements, and not the accounting treatment for derivative instruments and related hedged items, the adoption of the updated guidance did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. See Note 12 for disclosures
regarding our derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”, which is included within ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 350 amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The updated guidance in ASC Topic 350 is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset. The updated guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008, and is applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. We will apply the
updated guidance within ASC Topic 350 prospectively to material intangible assets for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. Disclosure requirements are applied prospectively to all material intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
17. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued |
In May 2008 the FASB ratified FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”, which is included in ASC Topic 470, Debt, which required issuers of convertible debt securities within its scope to separate these securities into
a debt component and an equity component, resulting in the debt component being recorded at fair value without consideration given to the conversion feature. Issuance costs were also allocated between the debt and equity components. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 470 required that convertible debt within its scope reflect a company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest expense is recognized. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 470 was effective fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2008, and applies retrospectively to all prior periods. The adoption the updated guidance within ASC Topic 470 did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition because the conversion feature associated with our convertible debt instrument does not provide for any cash settlement.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”, which is included within ASC Topic 260, EPS. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 260 clarified that unvested share-based payment
awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of EPS under the two-class method. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 260 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and required that all presented prior-period EPS data to be adjusted retrospectively. The adoption of the updated guidance within ASC Topic 260 did not have a significant impact on our results of operations
or financial condition, but resulted in a change to the calculation of basic and diluted EPS. See Note 15 for additional information regarding the impact of adopting the updated guidance within ASC Topic 260 on the calculation of EPS.
In November 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations”, which is included in ASC Topic 323, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 323 addressed how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment
should be determined, how an impairment assessment of an underlying indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed, how an equity method investee’s issuance of shares should be accounted for, and how to account for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 323 was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and is applied prospectively. Earlier application was
prohibited. The adoption of the updated guidance within ASC Topic 323 did not have any impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-4 and FIN No. 46R-8, “Disclosures about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities: An Amendment to FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, which is included in ASC
Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The updated guidance in ASC Topic 860 required public entities to provide additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets. It also required public enterprises to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Additionally, it required certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterprise that is a sponsor that has a variable interest in a VIE and an enterprise that holds a significant variable interest
in a qualified special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) but was not the transferor of financial assets to the QSPE. The disclosures were intended to provide greater transparency to financial statement users about a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets and enterprise’s involvement with VIEs. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 860 was effective for the first reporting period ending after December 15, 2008. Because the updated guidance within ASC Topic 860 impacted
the disclosure (and not the accounting treatment) for transferred financial assets and consolidation of VIES, the adoption of this updated guidance did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition. See Note 4 for disclosures regarding our transfer of financial assets and related secured borrowing obligation.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, which is included in ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments. The updated guidance with ASC Topic 825 related to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that were not currently reflected
on the balance sheet at fair value. Prior to the issuance of the updated guidance, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 825 required these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The updated guidance within ASC Topic 825 was effective for interim periods ending after June 15,
2009 and applies prospectively. Because the updated guidance impacted the disclosure requirements, and not the accounting treatment for the fair value of financial instruments, the adoption of updated guidance within ASC Topic 825 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. See Note 16 for disclosures regarding the fair value of financial instruments.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
17. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued |
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”, which is included in ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events. ASC Topic 855 established principles and requirements for evaluating and reporting subsequent events and distinguishes which subsequent events should be recognized in the financial statements versus which subsequent
events should be disclosed in the financial statements. ASC Topic 855 also required disclosure of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated by management. ASC Topic 855 was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 and applies prospectively. Because ASC Topic 855 impacted the disclosure requirements, and not the accounting treatment for subsequent events, the adoption of ASC Topic 855 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. See
Note 19 for disclosures regarding our subsequent events.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, which is included within ASC Topic 105, Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC Topic 105 modified the hierarchy to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and non-authoritative. All of the content included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM will be considered authoritative. ASC Topic 105 is not intended to amend GAAP but codifies previous accounting literature. ASC Topic 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. ASC Topic 105 became effective for our third quarter 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements and we have changed the referencing of authoritative accounting literature to conform to the Codification.
Accounting Standards to be Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”), which is pending inclusion in the Codification. SFAS 166 removes the concept of a QSPE and eliminates the exception for QSPEs from consolidation guidance. In
addition, SFAS 166 establishes specific conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. If the transfer does not meet established sale conditions, sale accounting can be achieved only if the transferor transfers an entire financial asset or a group of entire financial assets and surrenders control over the entire transferred asset(s). SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 166 on our results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”), which is pending inclusion in the Codification. This Statement amends FIN 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it
a controlling financial interest in a VIE. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics, among others: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity, or the right to receive benefits from the entity, that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Under SFAS 167, ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise
is the primary beneficiary of a VIE are required. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 167 on our results of operations or financial condition.
18. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
On April 9, 2003, T.J. Holdings, LLC (“TJ Holdings”), a member of Sun/Forest, LLC (“Sun/Forest”) (which, in turn, owns an equity interest in SunChamp), filed a complaint against us, SunChamp, certain other of our affiliates, including two of our directors, in the Superior Court of Guilford County, North Carolina.
The complaint alleges that the defendants wrongfully deprived the plaintiff of economic opportunities that they took for themselves in contravention of duties allegedly owed to the plaintiff and purports to claim damages of $13.0 million plus an unspecified amount for punitive damages. We believe the complaint and the claims threatened therein have no merit and will defend it vigorously. These proceedings were stayed by the Superior Court of Guilford County, North Carolina in 2004 pending final determination
by the Circuit Court of Oakland County, Michigan as to whether the dispute should be submitted to arbitration and the conclusion of all appeals therefrom. On March 13, 2007, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued an order compelling arbitration of all claims brought in the North Carolina case. TJ Holdings has filed an application for review in the Michigan Supreme Court which has been denied and, accordingly, the North Carolina case is permanently stayed. TJ Holdings has now filed an arbitration demand in Southfield,
Michigan based on the same claims. We intend to vigorously defend against the allegations.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We have evaluated our financial statements through the date the financial statements were issued, November 6, 2009, for subsequent events.
§ |
On October 23, 2009, aggregate dividends, distributions and dividend equivalents of $13.1 million were made to common stockholders, common OP unitholders, and restricted stockholders of record on October 13, 2009. |
§ |
On October 30, 2009, we completed a transaction of $5.0 million involving our installment notes. This transaction was recorded as a transfer of financial assets, and the cash proceeds related to this transaction were recorded as a secured borrowing. See Note 4 for additional information regarding our collateralized receivables and
secured borrowing transactions. |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, along with our 2008 Annual Report. Capitalized terms are used as defined elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. We own, operate, and develop manufactured housing communities concentrated in the midwestern, southern, and southeastern United States. We are fully integrated real estate companies which, together with our affiliates and predecessors, have been in the business
of acquiring, operating, and expanding manufactured housing communities since 1975. As September 30, 2009, we owned and operated a portfolio of 136 properties located in 18 states (the “Properties” or “Property”), including 124 manufactured housing communities, 4 recreational vehicle communities, and 8 properties containing both manufactured housing and recreational vehicle sites. As of September 30, 2009, the Properties contained an aggregate of 47,587 developed sites comprised of 42,301
developed manufactured home sites and 5,286 recreational vehicle sites and an additional 5,583 manufactured home sites suitable for development. We lease individual parcels of land (“sites”) with utility access for placement of manufactured homes (“MHs”) and recreational vehicles (“RVs”) to our customers. The Properties are designed to offer affordable housing to individuals and families, while also providing certain amenities.
We are engaged through a taxable subsidiary, SHS, in the marketing, selling, and leasing of new and pre-owned homes to current and future residents in our communities. The operations of SHS support and enhance our occupancy levels, property performance, and cash flows.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We have identified significant accounting policies that, as a result of the judgments, uncertainties, and complexities of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved could result in material changes to our financial condition or results of operations under different conditions or using different assumptions. Details regarding
significant accounting policies are described fully in our 2008 Annual Report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted several new accounting standards in the year beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”, which is now included within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (“ASC”)
Topic 810, Consolidation, impacted our results of operations and financial condition. This updated guidance resulted in the presentation of noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest, be reported as a separate component of equity in our Consolidated Financial Statements, and that losses be allocated to the noncontrolling interest even if the allocation resulted in a deficit balance. See Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Information for additional information
regarding the impact of adopting this guidance on our results of operations and financial position.
SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES
In addition to the results reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), we have provided information regarding Net Operating Income (“NOI”) in the following tables. NOI is derived from revenues minus property operating expenses and real estate taxes. We use NOI as the primary
basis to evaluate the performance of our operations. A reconciliation of NOI to net income (loss) attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. is included in “Results of Operations” below.
We believe that NOI is helpful to investors and analysts as a measure of operating performance because it is an indicator of the return on property investment, and provides a method of comparing property performance over time. We use NOI as a key management tool when evaluating performance and growth of particular properties and/or groups
of properties. The principal limitation of NOI is that it excludes depreciation, amortization, interest expense, and non-property specific expenses such as general and administrative expenses, all of which are significant costs, and therefore, NOI is a measure of the operating performance of our properties rather than of the company overall. We believe that these costs included in net income (loss) often have no effect on the market value of our property and therefore limit its use as a performance
measure. In addition, such expenses are often incurred at a parent company level and therefore are not necessarily linked to the performance of a real estate asset.
NOI should not be considered a substitute for the reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indicator of our financial performance, or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity; nor is it indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability
to make cash distributions. NOI, as determined and presented by us, may not be comparable to related or similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
We also provide information regarding Funds From Operations (“FFO”). A definition of FFO and a reconciliation of net loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. to FFO are included in the presentation of FFO in “Results of Operations” following the “Comparison of the Nine Months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008”.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We report operating results under two segments: Real Property Operations and Home Sales and Rentals. The Real Property Operations segment owns, operates, and develops manufactured housing communities concentrated in the midwestern, southern, and southeastern United States and is in the business of acquiring, operating, and expanding
manufactured housing communities. The Home Sales and Rentals segment offers manufactured home sales and leasing services to tenants and prospective tenants of our communities. We evaluate segment operating performance based on NOI.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those applied in the Consolidated Financial Statements, except for the use of NOI. We may allocate certain common costs, primarily corporate functions, between the segments differently than we would for stand alone financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. These allocated
costs include expenses for shared services such as information technology, finance, communications, legal, and human resources. We do not allocate interest expense and certain other corporate costs not directly associated with the segments’ NOI.
COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
REAL PROPERTY OPERATIONS - SAME SITE
A key management tool we use when evaluating performance and growth of particular properties is a comparison of Same Site communities. The Same Site data may change from time-to-time depending on acquisitions, dispositions, management discretion, significant transactions, or unique situations. The following tables
reflect certain financial and other information for particular properties owned and operated for the same period in both years as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information (in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Income from Real Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal, taxes, & insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
Other Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Number of properties |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupied sites (1) |
|
|
37,954 |
|
|
|
37,846 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rent per site (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sites available for development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Occupied sites include manufactured housing and permanent recreational vehicle sites, and exclude seasonal recreational vehicle sites. |
(2) |
Occupancy % and average rent relates only to manufactured housing sites, and excludes permanent and seasonal recreational vehicle sites. |
NOI remained stable due to increased revenue of $0.7 million, offset by increased expenses of $0.7 million. Income from real property consists of manufactured home and recreational vehicle site rent, and miscellaneous other property revenues. Revenue from our manufactured home and recreational vehicle portfolio
increased by $0.8 million due to an average rental rate increase of 2.9 percent, and an increase in the number of occupied home sites. Our miscellaneous other property revenues decreased by $0.1 million due to a decrease in cable television revenue sharing agreements which expired in 2008.
The growth in property operating expenses of $0.7 million was due to two main factors. Payroll and benefits increased by $0.5 million due to increased health insurance costs. Utility costs, primarily related to water, electricity charges, and rubbish removal, increased $0.2 million due to increased rates on these services. Other
property operating expenses related to supplies, repairs, legal fees, real estate taxes, property and casualty insurance, and administrative costs (such as postage and advertising) remained relatively flat.
As indicated above, the Same Site data is an analytical measure used by management to determine the performance and growth of our communities on a year over year basis. In order to evaluate the growth of the Same Site portfolio, management has classified certain items differently than our GAAP statements. There are two primary
reclassification differences between our GAAP statements and our Same Site portfolio. The first is the reclassification of water and sewer revenues from income from real property to utilities. A significant portion of our utility charges are re-billed to our residents. We reclassify these amounts to reflect the utility expenses associated with our Same Site portfolio, net of recovery.
HOME SALES AND RENTALS
We acquire pre-owned and repossessed manufactured homes that are generally within our communities from lenders and dealers at substantial discounts. We lease or sell these value priced homes to current and prospective residents. We also purchase new homes to lease and sell to current and prospective residents. The
programs we have established for our customers to lease or buy new and pre-owned homes have helped to stabilize portfolio occupancy.
The following table reflects certain financial and other information for our Rental Program as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except for certain items marked with *):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site rent from Rental Program (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs and refurbishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Program operating and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of occupied rentals, end of period* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in occupied rental homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of sold rental homes* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average monthly rental rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The renter’s monthly payment includes the site rent and an amount attributable to the leasing of the home. The site rent is reflected in the Real Property Operations segment. For purposes of management analysis, the site rent is included in the Rental Program revenue to evaluate the growth and performance of the Rental
Program. |
NOI increased $0.7 million from $7.2 million to $7.9 million, or 10.2 percent due to increased revenues of approximately $0.5 million, while expenses decreased by approximately $0.2 million. Revenues increased primarily due to an increase in the number of occupied rental homes in the Rental Program as indicated in the table above. Repair
and refurbishment costs decreased by $0.2 million due to a decrease in the number of moveouts in the Rental Program. Marketing and other costs decreased by $0.1 million primarily due to a decrease in bad debt expense. These cost savings were slightly offset by increased taxes and insurance expenses of $0.1 million as these costs generally increase as the number of homes in the Rental Program increase.
The following table reflects certain financial and statistical information for our Home Sales Program for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except for statistical information):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-owned home cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin % – new homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit – pre-owned homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin % – pre-owned homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from home sales increased by $0.5 million, or 28.3 percent, due to improved profit margins and an increase in the number of total homes sold. Gross profit increased by $0.1 million from new home sales and $0.4 million from pre-owned home sales.
The gross profit margin on new home sales increased 8.3 percent from 8.7 percent to 17.0 percent. Although the volume of new home sales decreased by 30.0 percent, the combination of higher average sale prices and lower average costs resulted in $0.1 million of increased overall gross profit.
The gross profit margin on pre-owned home sales increased 2.1 percent from 28.7 percent to 30.8 percent. Pre-owned home sales include the sale of homes that have been utilized in our Rental Program. The cost basis of a rental home is depreciated, therefore, the gross profit margin on the sale of these homes increases the longer
the home has been in the Rental Program. An increase in the volume of rental home sales is the primary reason for the overall increase in pre-owned home sales, therefore, the principal contributor to the increase in gross profit on pre-owned home sales.
OTHER INCOME STATEMENT ITEMS
Other revenues include other income (loss), interest income, and ancillary revenues, net. Other revenues increased by $1.0 million, from $0.3 million to $1.3 million, or 333.3 percent. This increase was due to increased interest income of $0.5 million, reduced
fees of $0.3 million associated with the transfer of our installment receivables servicing contract to a new service provider in the prior year, along with reduced losses of $0.2 associated with asset dispositions that occurred in the prior year. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the additional installment notes recognized in association with the transfer of financial assets that are recorded as collateralized receivables in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest
income on these collateralized receivables is offset by the same amount of interest expense recognized on the secured debt recorded in association with this transaction. See Note 4 – Secured Borrowing and Collateralized Receivables for additional information.
General and administrative costs increased by $0.2 million, from $5.4 million to $5.6 million, or 3.7 percent due to increased salary and other compensation costs of $0.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in legal and other expenses of $0.1 million.
Georgia flood damage charges were recorded during the period. On September 21, 2009, a flood caused substantial damage to our property, Countryside Village of Atlanta, located in Lawrenceville. We are still in the preliminary stages of assessing the damage to
our property. We have comprehensive insurance coverage for both property damage and business interruption, subject to deductibles and certain limitations. We believe the cost of the damage sustained from the flooding will be in excess of our insurance deductible. We have recorded a charge of $0.8 million associated with the flooding. This charge represents our deductible, net of expected insurance recoveries for the replacement of assets that exceed the net book value
of assets damaged in the flood.
Depreciation and amortization costs decreased by $0.2 million, from $16.0 million to $15.8 million, or 1.3 percent primarily due to the reduction of amortization expenses associated with promotional costs and other depreciation.
Interest expense on debt, including interest on mandatorily redeemable debt, decreased by $0.3 million, from $16.2 million to $15.9 million, or 1.9 percent due to a reduction in expense of $0.7 million mostly related to lower interest rates charged on variable rate debt, partially
offset by an increase in expense of $0.4 million associated with our secured borrowing arrangements. The interest expense on our secured borrowing is offset completely by the interest income recognized on our collateralized receivables. See Note 4 – Secured Borrowing and Collateralized Receivables in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information.
Equity loss from affiliates decreased by $0.6 million, from a loss of $1.5 million to a loss of $0.9 million. We recorded an other than temporary impairment charge of $1.3 million for our affiliate, Origen, in the third quarter of 2008.
The following is a summary of our consolidated financial results which were discussed in more detail in the preceding paragraphs (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses/Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to arrive at net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPARISON OF THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
REAL PROPERTY OPERATIONS - SAME SITE
A key management tool we use when evaluating performance and growth of particular properties is a comparison of Same Site communities. The Same Site data may change from time-to-time depending on acquisitions, dispositions, management discretion, significant transactions, or unique situations. The following tables
reflect certain financial and other information for particular properties owned and operated for the same period in both years as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information (in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Income from Real Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal, taxes, & insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
Other Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed sites |
|
|
47,587 |
|
|
|
47,608 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy % (2) |
|
|
82.3 |
% |
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Average monthly rent per site (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sites available for development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Occupied sites include manufactured housing and permanent recreational vehicle sites, and exclude seasonal recreational vehicle sites. |
(2) |
Occupancy % and average rent relates only to manufactured housing sites, and excludes permanent and seasonal recreational vehicle sites. |
NOI increased by $0.6 million from $96.7 million to $97.3 million, or 0.6 percent due to increased revenue of $1.9 million, partially offset by increased expenses of $1.3 million. Income from real property consists of manufactured home and recreational vehicle site rent, and miscellaneous other property revenues. Revenue
from our manufactured home and recreational vehicle portfolio increased by $2.3 million due to an average rental rate increase of 3.0 percent and an increase in the number of occupied home sites. Our miscellaneous other property revenues decreased by $0.4 million primarily due to a decrease in revenue from cable television revenue sharing agreements which expired in 2008.
The growth in real property operating expenses of $1.3 million was due to several factors. Payroll and benefits increased by $0.5 million primarily due to increased health insurance costs. Property and casualty insurance increased by $0.2 million due to an increase in reserves for current claims. Utility costs, primarily
related to water, electricity charges, and rubbish removal, increased $0.5 million due to increased rates on these services. Other expenses related to administrative costs, such as advertising and office expenses, increased by approximately $0.1 million. Other property operating expenses related to supplies, repairs, and real estate taxes remained relatively flat.
As indicated above, the Same Site data is an analytical measure used by management to determine the performance and growth of our communities on a year over year basis. In order to evaluate the growth of the Same Site portfolio, management has classified certain items differently than our GAAP statements. There are two primary
reclassification differences between our GAAP statements and our Same Site portfolio. The first is the reclassification of water and sewer revenues from income from real property to utilities. A significant portion of our utility charges are re-billed to our residents. We reclassify these amounts to reflect the utility expenses associated with our Same Site portfolio, net of recovery.
HOME SALES AND RENTALS
We acquire pre-owned and repossessed manufactured homes that are generally within our communities from lenders and dealers at substantial discounts. We lease or sell these value priced homes to current and prospective residents. We also purchase new homes to lease and sell to current and prospective residents. The
programs we have established for our customers to lease or buy new and pre-owned homes have helped to stabilize portfolio occupancy.
The following table reflects certain financial and other information for our Rental Program as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except for certain items marked with *):
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site rent from Rental Program (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs and refurbishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Program operating and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of occupied rentals, end of period* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in occupied rental homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of sold rental homes* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average monthly rental rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The renter’s monthly payment includes the site rent and an amount attributable to the leasing of the home. The site rent is reflected in the Real Property Operations segment. For purposes of management analysis, the site rent is included in the Rental Program revenue to evaluate the growth and performance of the Rental Program. |
Net operating income from the Rental Program increased $0.9 million from $22.0 million to $22.9 million, or 3.9 percent due to increased revenues of $1.7 million, offset by increased expenses of $0.8 million. Revenues increased $1.7 million due to the increased number of residents participating in the Rental Program as indicated in the
table above.
The growth in operating and maintenance expenses of $0.8 million was due to several factors. Commissions increased by $0.3 million due to an increase in the number of new and renewed leases on which commissions were paid. Total repair and refurbishment costs increased by $0.3 million due to an increase in the number
of homes and moveouts in the Rental Program. Taxes and insurance expenses increased by $0.2 million as these costs generally increase as the number of homes in the Rental Program increase. Marketing and other costs decreased slightly due to reductions in bad debt expense offset by increased advertising expenses.
.
The following table reflects certain financial and statistical information for our Home Sales Program for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except for statistical information):
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Financial Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-owned home cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin % – new homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit – pre-owned homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin % – pre-owned homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from home sales increased by $1.5 million, or 28.0 percent, primarily due to improved profit margins and an increase in the number of total homes sold. Gross profit from pre-owned home sales increased by $1.7 million, offset by decreased gross profit from new home sales of $0.2 million.
The gross profit margin on new home sales increased 3.6 percent from 11.3 percent to 14.9 percent. Although the gross profit margin has increased, the overall gross profit on new home sales declined by $0.2 million. The decline in new home sales profit was due to a 45.5 percent decline in sales volume.
The gross profit margin on pre-owned home sales increased 4.2 percent from 26.5 percent to 30.7 percent. Pre-owned home sales include the sale of homes that have been utilized in our Rental Program. The cost basis of a rental home is depreciated, therefore, the gross profit margin on the sale of these homes increases the longer
the home has been in the Rental Program. An increase in the volume of rental home sales is the primary reason for the overall increase in pre-owned home sales, therefore, the principal contributor to the increase in gross profit on pre-owned home sales.
OTHER INCOME STATEMENT ITEMS
Other revenues include other income (loss), interest income, and ancillary revenues, net. Other revenues decreased by $1.7 million, from $6.0 million to $4.3 million, or 28.3 percent. This decrease was due to reduced income realized from a gain on sale of land
and other assets of $3.3 million, along with decreased commission and ancillary revenue of $0.2 million, offset by reduced fees of $0.3 million associated with the transfer of our installment receivables servicing contract to a new service provider in the prior year and increased interest income of $1.5 million. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the additional installment notes receivable recognized in association with the transfer of financial assets that are recorded as collateralized
receivables in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest income on these collateralized receivables is offset by the same amount of interest expense recognized on the secured debt recorded in association with this transaction. See Note 4 – Secured Borrowing and Collateralized Receivables for additional information.
General and administrative costs increased by $0.8 million, from $17.5 million to $18.3 million, or 4.6 percent due to increased salary and other compensation costs of $1.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in legal and other expenses of $0.2 million. The compensation
cost increase includes increased amortization of deferred compensation related to the vesting of restricted stock in May 2009.
Georgia flood damage charges were recorded during the period. On September 21, 2009, a flood caused substantial damage to our property, Countryside Village of Atlanta, located in Lawrenceville. We are still in the preliminary stages of assessing the damage to
our property. We have comprehensive insurance coverage for both property damage and business interruption, subject to deductibles and certain limitations. We believe the cost of the damage sustained from the flooding will be in excess of our insurance deductible. We have recorded a charge of $0.8 million associated with the flooding. This charge represents our deductible, net of expected insurance recoveries for the replacement of assets that exceed the net book value
of assets damaged in the flood.
Depreciation and amortization costs decreased by $0.1 million, from $48.1 million to $48.0 million due to decreased amortization of promotions and other depreciation of $0.7 million offset by an increase in depreciation on investment property for use in our Rental Program of $0.6 million.
Interest expense on debt, including interest on mandatorily redeemable debt, decreased by $1.2 million, from $47.8 million to $46.6 million, or 2.5 percent due to a reduction in expense of $3.3 million primarily due to lower interest rates charged on variable rate debt, partially offset
by increased expense of $2.1 million associated with our secured borrowing arrangements. The interest expense on our secured borrowing is offset completely by the interest income recognized on our collateralized receivables. See Note 4 – Secured Borrowing and Collateralized Receivables in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Equity loss from affiliates decreased by $12.7 million, from a loss of $14.0 million to loss of $1.3 million. Our affiliate, Origen, reported losses in the first nine months of 2008 which included charges for impairment, loan loss reserves, and loss on sale of loan portfolio. Additionally,
we recorded an other than temporary impairment charge of $8.1 million in the prior year.
Provision for state income taxes increased by $0.4 million, from a nominal amount to an expense of $0.4 million, due to a change in the effective tax rate used to calculate the deferred tax liability related to the Michigan Business Tax and utilization of investment tax credits, which
reduced tax expense in 2008.
The following is a summary of our consolidated financial results which were discussed in more detail in the preceding paragraphs (in thousands):
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses/Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to arrive at net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for state income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide information regarding FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) as net income (computed in accordance GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, plus real estate-related
depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Due to the variety among owners of identical assets in similar condition (based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), we believe excluding gains and losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, provides a better indicator of our operating performance. FFO is a useful supplemental
measure of our operating performance because it reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, and operating costs, providing perspective not readily apparent from net income. Management, the investment community, and banking institutions routinely use FFO, together with other measures, to measure operating performance in our industry. Further, management uses FFO for planning and forecasting future periods.
Because FFO excludes significant economic components of net income including depreciation and amortization, FFO should be used as an adjunct to net income (loss) and not as an alternative to net income. The principal limitation of FFO is that it does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and is a supplemental measure
of performance that does not replace net income as a measure of performance or net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity. In addition, FFO is not intended as a measure of a REIT’s ability to meet debt principal repayments and other cash requirements, nor as a measure of working capital. FFO only provides investors with an additional performance measure. Other REITS may use different methods for calculating FFO and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to other REITs.
The following table reconciles net loss to FFO and calculates FFO data for both basic and diluted purposes for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED September 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Amounts in thousands, except per share/OP unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for state income taxes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares/OP Units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per weighted average Common Share/OP Unit - Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per weighted average Common Share/OP Unit - Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below adjusts FFO to exclude equity loss from affiliate (Origen Inc.), severance charges, and Georgia flood damage charges (in thousands).
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity affiliate adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for state income taxes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted FFO per weighted average Common Share/OP Unit - Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The tax benefit for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 represents the reversal of a tax provision for potential taxes payable on the sale of company assets related to the enactment of the Michigan Business Tax. These taxes do not impact Funds from Operations and would be payable from prospective proceeds of such sales. |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal liquidity demands have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, distributions to our stockholders and the unitholders of the Operating Partnership, capital improvements of properties, the purchase of new and pre-owned homes, property acquisitions, development and expansion of properties, and debt repayment.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through working capital provided by operating activities and through borrowings on our lines of credit. We consider these resources to be adequate to meet all operating requirements, including recurring capital improvements, routinely amortizing debt and other normally recurring expenditures
of a capital nature, payment of dividends to our stockholders to maintain qualification as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, and payment of distributions to our Operating Partnership’s unitholders. Due to the limited amount of taxable income that we have reported for the past few years, dividend payments to shareholders and unitholders of our Operating Partnership have been largely discretionary rather than required to maintain qualification as a REIT.
From time to time, we evaluate acquisition opportunities that meet our criteria for acquisition. Should such investment opportunities arise in 2009, we will finance the acquisitions though secured financing, the assumption of existing debt on the properties or the issuance of certain equity securities. The difficulty in obtaining financing
in the current credit markets may make the acquisition of properties unlikely.
We have invested approximately $20.8 million related to the acquisition of homes intended for our Rental Program during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Expenditures for 2009 will be dependent upon the condition of the markets for repossessions and new home sales, as well as rental homes. We have a $10.0 million floor plan facility.
Our ability to purchase homes for sale or rent may be limited by cash received from third party financing of our home sales, available floor plan financing and working capital available on our unsecured line of credit.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.1 million from $6.2 million at December 31, 2008, to $5.1 million at September 30, 2009. Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations increased by $4.7 million from $40.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $45.4 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Our net cash flows provided by operating activities from continuing operations may be adversely impacted by, among other things: (a) the market and economic conditions in our current markets generally, and specifically in metropolitan areas of our current markets; (b) lower occupancy and rental rates of our properties; (c) increased operating
costs, such as wage and benefit costs, insurance premiums, real estate taxes and utilities, that cannot be passed on to our tenants; (d) decreased sales of manufactured homes and (e) current volatility in economic conditions and the financial markets. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report.
We have an unsecured revolving line of credit facility with a maximum borrowing capacity of $115.0 million, subject to certain borrowing base calculations. The outstanding balance on the line of credit at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $84.3 million and $85.8 million, respectively. In addition, $3.3 million of availability
was used to back standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Borrowings under the line of credit bear an interest rate of LIBOR plus 165 basis points, or prime plus 40 basis points. We have the option to borrow at either rate. The effective weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings was 1.9 percent as of September 30, 2009. The borrowings under the line of credit mature October 1, 2011, assuming an election of a one-year extension that is available at
our discretion. As of September 30, 2009, $27.4 million was available to be drawn under the facility based on the calculation of the borrowing base. During 2009, the highest balance on the line of credit was $105.0 million. Although the unsecured revolving line of credit is a committed facility, the financial failure of one or more of the participating financial institutions may reduce the amount of available credit for use by us.
The line of credit facility contains various leverage, debt service coverage, net worth maintenance and other customary covenants all of which were complied with as of September 30, 2009. The most limiting covenants contained in the line of credit are the distribution coverage and debt service coverage ratios. The distribution coverage
covenant requires that distributions be no more than 90 percent of funds from operations as defined in the terms of the line of credit agreement. The debt service coverage covenant requires a minimum ratio of 1.45:1. As of September 30, 2009, the distribution coverage was 83.7 percent and the debt service coverage was 1.70:1.
The sub-prime credit crisis and ensuing decline in credit availability have caused turmoil in US and foreign markets. Many industries with no direct involvement with sub-prime lending, securitizations, home building, or mortgages have suffered share price declines as economic uncertainty has derailed investor confidence. While many of our
fundamentals, and those of the manufactured housing industry, have been improving over recent years, our share price has suffered. For us, the most relevant consequence of this financial turmoil is the uncertainty of the availability of new secured credit, floor plan financing, credit for refinancing properties, and the limited credit availability on our current unsecured line of credit. We believe this risk is somewhat mitigated because we have adequate working capital provided by operating activities as noted
above and we have only limited debt maturities until July 2011. Specifically, our debt maturities (excluding normal amortization payments and assuming the election of certain extension provisions which are at our discretion) for 2009 through 2013 are as follows:
Remaining 2009 |
$0.5 million |
2010 |
$0.8 million and any balance outstanding on the floor plan facility |
2011 |
$103.7 million and any balance outstanding on the unsecured line of credit |
2012 |
$35.9 million |
2013 |
$30.2 million |
We anticipate meeting our long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled debt maturities, large property acquisitions, and Operating Partnership unit redemptions through the collateralization of our properties. We currently have 30 unencumbered properties with an estimated market value of $196.9 million, 29 of which support the borrowing
base for our $115.0 million unsecured line of credit. As of September 30, 2009, the borrowing base was in excess of $115.0 million by $13.7 million, which would allow us to remove properties from the borrowing base at our discretion for collateralization. From time to time, we may also issue shares of our capital stock or preferred stock, issue equity units in our Operating Partnership or sell selected assets. Our ability to finance our long-term liquidity requirements in such a manner will
be affected by numerous economic factors affecting the manufactured housing community industry at the time, including the availability and cost of mortgage debt, our financial condition, the operating history of the properties, the state of the debt and equity markets, and the general national, regional, and local economic conditions. If it were to become necessary for us to approach the credit markets, the current volatility in the credit markets could make borrowing more difficult to secure and more expensive.
See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report. If we are unable to obtain additional debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely impacted.
As of September 30, 2009, our debt to total market capitalization approximated 73.4 percent (assuming conversion of all Common Operating Partnership Units to shares of common stock). The debt has a weighted average maturity of approximately 5.3 years and a weighted average interest rate of 4.9 percent.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 included recurring capital expenditures of $5.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively. We are committed to the continued upkeep of our Properties and therefore do not expect a significant decline in our recurring capital expenditures during 2009.
Net cash used for investing activities was $22.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $24.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The difference is due to decreased investment in property of $2.0 million, decreased investment in affiliates of $0.5 million, and increased principal repayment on
an officer’s note and other notes receivable of $5.2 million, offset by a $6.2 million decrease in cash received from the disposition on land and other assets.
Net cash used for financing activities was $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The difference is due to a $10.2 million increase in repayments on notes payable and other debt, reduced proceeds of $12.3 million received from the issuance of debt,
increased costs associated with transactions related to our debt of $0.2 million, and increased distributions to our stockholders and OP unitholders of $0.2 million, partially offset by a $12.3 million net increase in borrowings on the lines of credit and increase of $2.0 million associated with the net proceeds received from the issuance of additional shares.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and we intend that such forward-looking statements will be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. For this purpose, any statements contained in this filing that relate to prospective
events or developments are deemed to be forward-looking statements. Words such as “believes,” “forecasts,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “expects,” “may”, “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, both
general and specific to the matters discussed in this filing. These risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include the national, regional and local economic climates, the ability to maintain rental rates and occupancy levels, competitive market forces, changes in market rates of interest, the ability of manufactured home buyers to obtain financing, the level of
repossessions by manufactured home lenders and those risks and uncertainties referenced under the headings entitled “Risk Factors” contained in our 2008 Annual Report, and our filings with the SEC. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date hereof and we expressly disclaim any obligation to provide public updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements made herein to reflect changes in our expectations of future events.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk. We mitigate this risk by maintaining prudent amounts of leverage, minimizing capital costs and interest expense while continuously evaluating all available debt and equity resources and following established risk management policies and procedures, which include the periodic use
of derivatives. Our primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on our future cash flows. We generally employ derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
We have four derivative contracts consisting of three interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $70.0 million, and an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $152.4 million as of September 30, 2009. The first swap agreement fixes $25.0 million of variable rate borrowings at 6.70 percent through July 2012. The
second swap agreement, entered into in January 2009, fixes $20.0 million of variable rate borrowings at 4.15 percent through January 2014. The third swap agreement, entered into in February 2009, fixes $25.0 million of variable rate borrowing at 3.62 percent through February 2011 and is based upon 30-day LIBOR. In April 2009, we entered into a new interest cap agreement with a cap rate of 11.0 percent, a notional amount of $152.4 million, and a termination date of May 1, 2012. Each of these derivative
contracts is based upon 90-day LIBOR unless otherwise noted.
Our remaining variable rate debt totals $238.3 million and $222.8 million as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which bear interest at prime, various LIBOR or Fannie Mae Discounted Mortgage Backed Securities (“DMBS”) rates. If prime, LIBOR, or DMBS increased or decreased by 1.0 percent during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, we believe our interest expense would have increased or decreased by approximately $1.6 million based on the $216.0 million and $216.5 million average balances outstanding under our variable rate debt facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. A portion of our variable debt is floating on DMBS rates. If the credit markets tighten, and there are fewer or no buyers of this security, the interest rate may be negatively impacted
resulting in higher interest expense.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Gary A. Shiffman, and Chief Financial Officer, Karen J. Dearing, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in our filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports
that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
|
(b) |
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should review our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which contains a detailed description of risk factors that may materially affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. There are no material changes to the disclosure on these matters set forth in such Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In November 2004, the Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. We have 400,000 common shares remaining in the repurchase program. No common shares were repurchased during 2009. There is no expiration date specified for the buyback program.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In March 2009, our Operating Partnership issued 110,444 Common OP Units to Water Oak, Ltd. During 2009, holders of Common OP Units have converted 119,806 units to common stock.
All of the above partnership units and shares of common stock were issued in private placements in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including Regulation D promulgated there under. No underwriters were used in connection with any of such issuances.
Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities
We received net proceeds of approximately $1.9 million from the sale of 100,000 shares of common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The proceeds were used to pay down our unsecured line of credit.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On July 29, 2009, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At the meeting, three directors were elected to serve until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The results of the election appear below:
Nominees |
|
For |
|
% of Shares
Voted |
|
Withheld |
|
% of Shares
Voted |
|
Ted J. Simon |
|
13,327,856 |
|
75.8% |
|
4,252,572 |
|
24.2% |
|
Paul D. Lapides |
|
13,328,331 |
|
75.8% |
|
4,252,097 |
|
24.2% |
|
Robert H. Naftaly |
|
13,365,739 |
|
76.0% |
|
4,214,689 |
|
24.0% |
|
In addition, the Company received approval for the Sun Communities, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the vote appear below:
For |
|
% of Shares
Voted |
|
Against |
|
% of Shares Voted |
|
Abstain |
|
% of Shares
Voted |
|
9,404,479 |
|
74.0% |
|
3,256,812 |
|
25.7% |
|
41,219 |
|
0.3% |
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
|
Dated: November 6, 2009 |
|
By: |
/s/ Karen J. Dearing |
|
|
|
Karen J. Dearing, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |