e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-16533
ProAssurance Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
63-1261433 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Brookwood Place, Birmingham, AL
|
|
35209 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(205) 877-4400 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrants Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
|
|
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former
Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter), during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As
of July 26, 2011, there were 30,591,296 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Any statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are specifically identified as
forward-looking statements. These statements are based upon our estimates and anticipation of
future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
vary materially from the expected results described in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as, but not limited to, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, hope, hopeful, intend, may, optimistic, preliminary,
potential, project, should, will and other analogous expressions. There are numerous
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Thus, sentences and phrases that we use to convey our view of future events and trends
are expressly designated as forward-looking statements as are sections of this Form 10-Q that are
identified as giving our outlook on future business.
Forward-looking statements relating to our business include among other things: statements
concerning liquidity and capital requirements, investment valuation and performance, return on
equity, financial ratios, net income, premiums, losses and loss reserves, premium rates and
retention of current business, competition and market conditions, the expansion of product lines,
the development or acquisition of business in new geographical areas, the availability of
acceptable reinsurance, actions by regulators and rating agencies, court actions, legislative
actions, payment or performance of obligations under indebtedness, payment of dividends, and other
matters.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and
uncertainties, including, among other things, the following factors that could affect the actual
outcome of future events:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are
different than anticipated; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory, legislative and judicial actions or decisions that could affect our
business plans or operations; |
|
|
|
|
the enactment or repeal of tort reforms; |
|
|
|
|
formation or dissolution of state-sponsored medical professional liability
insurance entities that could remove or add sizable groups of physicians from the
private insurance market; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of deflation or inflation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the interest rate environment; |
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. laws or government regulations regarding financial markets or
market activity that may affect the U.S. economy and our business; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the ability of the U.S. government to meet its obligations that may
affect the U.S. economy and our business; |
|
|
|
|
performance of financial markets affecting the fair value of our investments or
making it difficult to determine the value of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices that may be adopted by our
regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations affecting medical professional
liability insurance or the financial community; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of changes in the health care delivery system, including but not
limited to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainties inherent in the estimate of loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves and reinsurance, and changes in the availability, cost, quality, or
collectability of insurance/reinsurance; |
|
|
|
|
the results of litigation, including pre- or post-trial motions, trials and/or
appeals we undertake; |
|
|
|
|
allegation of bad faith which may arise from our handling of any particular
claim, including failure to settle; |
|
|
|
|
loss of independent agents; |
2
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and recruit senior management; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to purchase reinsurance and collect recoveries from our reinsurers; |
|
|
|
|
assessments from guaranty funds; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or
through acquisitions or business combinations; |
|
|
|
|
changes to the ratings assigned by rating agencies to our insurance
subsidiaries, individually or as a group; |
|
|
|
|
insurance market conditions may alter the effectiveness of our current business
strategy and impact our revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the expected benefits from completed and proposed acquisitions may not be
achieved or may be delayed longer than expected due to business disruption, loss of
customers, employees and key agents, increased operating costs or inability to
achieve cost savings, and assumption of greater than expected liabilities, among
other reasons. |
Our results may differ materially from those we expect and discuss in any forward-looking
statements. The principal risk factors that may cause these differences are described in Item 1A,
Risk Factors in our Form 10-K and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, such as our current reports on Form 8-K, and our regular reports on Forms 10-Q and
10-K.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date made, and advise readers that these factors could affect our financial
performance and could cause actual results for future periods to differ materially from any
opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. Except
as required by law or regulations, we do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to
publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of
anticipated or unanticipated events.
3
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
3,635,084 |
|
|
$ |
3,603,754 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
Equity securities, trading, at fair value |
|
|
36,277 |
|
|
|
37,286 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
128,901 |
|
|
|
168,438 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
51,421 |
|
|
|
50,484 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
116,885 |
|
|
|
88,754 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
35,979 |
|
|
|
38,078 |
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
4,004,702 |
|
|
|
3,990,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
101,226 |
|
|
|
50,851 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
119,731 |
|
|
|
120,950 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
4,582 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
278,777 |
|
|
|
277,436 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
15,738 |
|
|
|
11,023 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
27,433 |
|
|
|
27,281 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
32,457 |
|
|
|
56,862 |
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
43,256 |
|
|
|
43,951 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
55,964 |
|
|
|
60,031 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
161,453 |
|
|
|
161,453 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
82,351 |
|
|
|
70,205 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,926,607 |
|
|
$ |
4,875,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities and accruals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
2,402,264 |
|
|
$ |
2,414,100 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
249,236 |
|
|
|
256,050 |
|
Reinsurance premiums payable |
|
|
103,878 |
|
|
|
111,680 |
|
|
|
|
Total Policy Liabilities |
|
|
2,755,378 |
|
|
|
2,781,830 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
153,504 |
|
|
|
186,259 |
|
Long-term debt, $35,498 and $35,488, at amortized cost, respectively;
$15,863 and $15,616 at fair value, respectively |
|
|
51,361 |
|
|
|
51,104 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,960,243 |
|
|
|
3,019,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
34,515,945 and 34,419,383 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
535,427 |
|
|
|
532,213 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred tax expense
(benefit) of $53,340 and $42,607, respectively |
|
|
99,057 |
|
|
|
79,124 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,530,816 |
|
|
|
1,428,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165,645 |
|
|
|
2,039,707 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost, 3,924,970 shares and 3,666,149 shares, respectively |
|
|
(199,281 |
) |
|
|
(183,844 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,966,364 |
|
|
|
1,855,863 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,926,607 |
|
|
$ |
4,875,056 |
|
|
|
|
4
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Capital
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,855,863 |
|
|
$ |
79,124 |
|
|
$ |
1,428,026 |
|
|
$ |
348,713 |
|
Net income |
|
|
102,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
19,933 |
|
|
|
19,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares reacquired |
|
|
(15,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,437 |
) |
Common shares issued for compensation and net effect
of performance shares issued and stock options exercised |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,966,364 |
|
|
$ |
99,057 |
|
|
$ |
1,530,816 |
|
|
$ |
336,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,704,595 |
|
|
$ |
59,254 |
|
|
$ |
1,196,428 |
|
|
$ |
448,913 |
|
Net income |
|
|
78,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
45,385 |
|
|
|
45,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares reacquired |
|
|
(39,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,168 |
) |
Common shares issued for compensation and net effect
of performance shares issued and stock options exercised |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,792,978 |
|
|
$ |
104,639 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,921 |
|
|
$ |
413,418 |
|
|
|
|
5
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
$ |
98,522 |
|
|
$ |
276,115 |
|
|
$ |
255,699 |
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
107,011 |
|
|
$ |
88,868 |
|
|
$ |
256,894 |
|
|
$ |
234,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
142,409 |
|
|
$ |
135,933 |
|
|
$ |
283,783 |
|
|
$ |
270,204 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(5,346 |
) |
|
|
(10,535 |
) |
|
|
(14,643 |
) |
|
|
(21,379 |
) |
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
137,063 |
|
|
|
125,398 |
|
|
|
269,140 |
|
|
|
248,825 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
36,297 |
|
|
|
37,081 |
|
|
|
72,457 |
|
|
|
74,709 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
(3,780 |
) |
|
|
3,825 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses (OTTI) |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
(4,912 |
) |
|
|
(2,902 |
) |
|
|
(12,379 |
) |
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in
(reclassified from) other comprehensive income
before taxes |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(7,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,583 |
) |
|
|
(12,373 |
) |
Other net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
9,907 |
|
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
|
Total net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
(3,501 |
) |
|
|
6,324 |
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
174,829 |
|
|
|
161,500 |
|
|
|
348,414 |
|
|
|
325,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
69,394 |
|
|
|
77,170 |
|
|
|
146,493 |
|
|
|
165,078 |
|
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(5,041 |
) |
|
|
(8,646 |
) |
|
|
(11,717 |
) |
|
|
(17,853 |
) |
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
64,353 |
|
|
|
68,524 |
|
|
|
134,776 |
|
|
|
147,225 |
|
Underwriting, policy acquisition and operating expenses |
|
|
32,871 |
|
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
68,578 |
|
|
|
62,846 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
98,142 |
|
|
|
100,993 |
|
|
|
205,067 |
|
|
|
211,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
76,687 |
|
|
|
60,507 |
|
|
|
143,347 |
|
|
|
113,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current expense (benefit) |
|
|
21,769 |
|
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
26,829 |
|
|
|
31,925 |
|
Deferred expense (benefit) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
|
13,728 |
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
21,591 |
|
|
|
20,126 |
|
|
|
40,557 |
|
|
|
35,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,096 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
32,322 |
|
|
|
30,600 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,856 |
|
|
|
32,721 |
|
|
|
30,855 |
|
|
|
32,743 |
|
|
|
|
6
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,096 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
24,224 |
|
|
|
32,141 |
|
|
|
19,933 |
|
|
|
45,385 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
79,320 |
|
|
$ |
72,522 |
|
|
$ |
122,723 |
|
|
$ |
123,878 |
|
|
|
|
7
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,954 |
|
|
|
13,133 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
(6,324 |
) |
|
|
5,905 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,728 |
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
Other |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of business combinations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
|
|
(8,562 |
) |
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(11,836 |
) |
|
|
(9,887 |
) |
Unearned premiums |
|
|
(6,814 |
) |
|
|
(13,232 |
) |
Reinsurance related assets and liabilities |
|
|
(12,795 |
) |
|
|
7,993 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(47,261 |
) |
|
|
(21,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
53,052 |
|
|
|
75,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(452,833 |
) |
|
|
(458,291 |
) |
Equity securities trading |
|
|
(31,325 |
) |
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(5,255 |
) |
Cash invested in unconsolidated subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit limited partnerships |
|
|
(17,232 |
) |
|
|
(4,225 |
) |
Other partnership investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,237 |
) |
Proceeds from sale or maturities of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
449,364 |
|
|
|
502,769 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Equity securities trading |
|
|
33,908 |
|
|
|
26,812 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
Net sales or maturities (purchases) of short-term investments, excluding unsettled redemptions |
|
|
39,537 |
|
|
|
(101,862 |
) |
Unsettled security transactions, net |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
22,263 |
|
Cash received (paid) for other assets |
|
|
(11,428 |
) |
|
|
(2,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
14,926 |
|
|
|
(32,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(14,993 |
) |
|
|
(39,168 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(17,603 |
) |
|
|
(38,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
50,375 |
|
|
|
4,645 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
50,851 |
|
|
|
40,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
101,226 |
|
|
$ |
45,287 |
|
|
|
|
8
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (ProAssurance or PRA). The financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included.
ProAssurances results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes contained in ProAssurances December 31, 2010 report on
Form 10-K. In connection with its preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
ProAssurance evaluated events that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2011 for recognition or
disclosure in its financial statements and notes to financial statements.
Reclassifications
As of June 30, 2011, ProAssurance has reported intangible assets as a separate line item on
the Balance Sheet. Prior period balances in this report have been reclassified to conform to the
2011 presentation. The reclassification had no effect on income from continuing operations, net
income or total assets.
Accounting Changes Not Yet Adopted
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, the FASB
revised guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance establishes
two acceptable options for the presentation of comprehensive income: 1) separate consecutive
statements of net income and comprehensive income or 2) a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income that includes both the computation of net income and the computation of other
comprehensive income. Regardless of the option chosen, reclassification adjustments between other
comprehensive income and net income must be presented on the face of the financial statements;
total comprehensive income must also be presented. The guidance is applicable to all periods
presented. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance on January 1, 2012. Adoption of this guidance
will have no effect on ProAssurances results of operations or financial position.
Fair Value Measurements
Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, the FASB
revised guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures, all of which are to be applied
prospectively. The new guidance increases disclosure requirements regarding valuation methods used
to determine fair value measurements categorized as Level 3, as well as the sensitivity to change of those
measurements, and requires additional disclosures regarding the consideration given to highest and
best use in fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets. The guidance also requires that when
fair value measurements of items not carried at fair value are disclosed, the fair value
measurements are to be categorized by level of fair value hierarchy. Additionally, the guidance
also clarifies or revises certain fair
value measurement principles related to the valuation of financial instruments managed within
a portfolio, the valuation of instruments classified as a part of shareholders equity, the
appropriate application of the highest and best use valuation premise, and the consideration of
premium and discounts in a fair value
9
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
1. Basis of Presentation (continued)
measurement. ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2012. Adoption of this
guidance is not expected to have a material effect on ProAssurances results of operations or
financial position.
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts
Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, the FASB revised guidance
regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance
contracts qualify for deferral. The guidance permits deferral of qualifying costs associated only
with successful contract acquisitions. Internal selling agent and underwriter salary and benefit
costs allocated to unsuccessful contracts, as well as advertising costs, are excluded. The guidance
must be applied prospectively, but may be applied retrospectively for all prior periods.
ProAssurance plans to adopt the guidance beginning January 1, 2012. Adoption of this guidance is
not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Accounting Changes
Intangibles, Goodwill and Other
Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, the FASB
revised guidance related to goodwill impairment testing. The revised guidance clarifies that when
evaluating goodwill associated with a reporting unit that has a zero or negative carrying value, an
initial determination should be made as to whether it is more likely than not that the goodwill is
impaired. When impairment is more likely than not, the goodwill is required to be tested for
impairment. ProAssurance adopted the guidance on January 1, 2011. Adoption had no material effect
on ProAssurances results of operations or financial position.
Fair Value Measurements
Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, the FASB
revised guidance to require additional disclosure about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. ProAssurance adopted
the guidance on January 1, 2011. Adoption had no effect on ProAssurances results of operations or
financial position.
10
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
2. Acquisitions
All entities acquired have been accounted for in accordance with GAAP relating to business
combinations and are considered to be a part of ProAssurances sole reporting segment, the
professional liability segment.
On November 30, 2010 ProAssurance acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of American
Physicians Service Group, Inc. (APS) as a means of expanding its professional liability business.
Total purchase consideration transferred had a fair value of $237 million on the acquisition date
and included cash of $233 million and deferred compensation commitments of $4 million.
APS operating results included in ProAssurance Consolidated results for 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
15,717 |
|
|
$ |
31,590 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
5,118 |
|
|
$ |
9,779 |
|
The following table provides ProAssurance Pro Forma Consolidated Results as if
ProAssurance had acquired APS on January 1, 2010. Pro Forma results reflect ProAssurance
Consolidated results, adjusted, net of related tax effects, as follows: 1) in 2010, to include the
operating results of APS, 2) to reflect APS workforce reductions as if the reductions had occurred
on January 1, 2010, 3) to exclude the direct costs of completing the APS transaction, 4) to include
amortization of APS policy acquisition costs written off upon acquisition, and 5) to reflect
amortization of certain purchase adjustments (valuation of investment assets at fair value;
intangibles recorded as a part of the purchase price allocation) beginning January 1, 2010.
ProAssurance Actual Consolidated Results are also presented for comparative purposes. The
ProAssurance Actual Consolidated results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 do not
include the operating results of APS because the APS acquisition did not occur until November 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
ProAssurance Pro |
|
|
ProAssurance Actual |
|
|
ProAssurance Pro |
|
|
ProAssurance Actual |
|
|
|
Forma Consolidated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Forma Consolidated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
174,829 |
|
|
$ |
174,829 |
|
|
$ |
348,414 |
|
|
$ |
348,414 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
55,356 |
|
|
$ |
55,096 |
|
|
$ |
103,367 |
|
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
ProAssurance Pro |
|
|
ProAssurance Actual |
|
|
ProAssurance Pro |
|
|
ProAssurance Actual |
|
|
|
Forma Consolidated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Forma Consolidated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
|
Results |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
182,080 |
|
|
$ |
161,500 |
|
|
$ |
365,894 |
|
|
$ |
325,459 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
46,321 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
88,373 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
For additional information regarding the acquisition, see Note 2 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in ProAssurances 2010 Form 10-K.
11
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three
level hierarchy has been established for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent
(observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with the inputs considered most
observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least observable categorized as Level 3.
Hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
|
Level 1: |
|
quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. For ProAssurance, Level 1 inputs are generally quotes
for debt or equity securities actively traded in exchange or over-the-counter
markets. |
|
|
Level 2: |
|
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting
entity (observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 2 inputs generally include
quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar
assets/liabilities, and results from pricing models that use observable inputs
such as interest rates and yield curves that are generally available at
commonly quoted intervals. |
|
|
Level 3: |
|
the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant
assumptions based on the best information available in the circumstances
(non-observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 3 inputs are used in
situations where little or no Level 1 or 2 inputs are available or are
inappropriate given the particular circumstances. Level 3 inputs include
results from pricing models for which some or all of the inputs are not
observable, discounted cash flow methodologies, single non-binding broker
quotes and adjustments to externally quoted prices that are based on management
judgment or estimation. |
The following tables present information about ProAssurances assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and indicate
the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such value. For some
assets, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy. When this is the case, the asset is categorized based on the level of the most
significant input to the fair value measurement. ProAssurances assessment of the significance of a
particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and considers factors specific to
the assets being valued.
12
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, including financial instruments for which ProAssurance has elected fair value
accounting, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,744 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,744 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,877 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158,843 |
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
1,166,168 |
|
Corporate bonds, multiple observable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,575 |
|
Corporate bonds, limited observable inputs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private placement senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
Other corporate bonds, NRSRO ratings available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
Other corporate bonds, NRSRO ratings not available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,698 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,039 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,469 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
77,153 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,258 |
|
Energy |
|
|
7,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,092 |
|
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,535 |
|
Technology |
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
Communications |
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
Index funds |
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
All other |
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
Short-term investments (1) |
|
|
125,214 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,901 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,127 |
|
|
|
25,127 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
161,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,621,932 |
|
|
$ |
41,966 |
|
|
$ |
3,825,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 Note Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,715 |
|
|
$ |
19,715 |
|
|
|
|
13
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
225,908 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
225,908 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,878 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236,374 |
|
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
1,243,924 |
|
Corporate bonds, multiple observable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312,035 |
|
Corporate bonds, limited observable inputs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private placement senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
9,356 |
|
Other corporate bonds, NRSRO ratings available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,414 |
|
|
|
10,414 |
|
Other corporate bonds, NRSRO ratings not available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,640 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
569,838 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,386 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,534 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
62,556 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
Energy |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521 |
|
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
Technology |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
All Other |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
4,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,317 |
|
Energy |
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
Technology |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
Communications |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Index funds |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
All other |
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
Short-term investments (1) |
|
|
150,344 |
|
|
|
18,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,438 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,112 |
|
|
|
25,112 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
191,267 |
|
|
$ |
3,590,849 |
|
|
$ |
56,111 |
|
|
$ |
3,838,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 Note Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Short-term investments are reported at amortized cost, which is either equivalent to fair
value (Level 1 classification) or closely approximates fair value (Level 2 classification). |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interests in private investment funds that are valued at the net asset value
provided by the fund, which approximates fair value. Other equity interests for which the
carrying value of the interest does not approximate fair value are excluded. |
The fair values for securities included in the Level 2 category, with the few exceptions
described below, have been developed by third party, nationally recognized pricing services. These
services use complex methodologies to determine values for securities and subject the values they
develop to quality control reviews. The services collect and utilize multiple inputs, although not
all inputs are used for every security type or given the same priority in every evaluation. Inputs
used include: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided
markets, benchmark securities, bids, and offers. The services also consider credit ratings, where
appropriate, including ratings updates and information available in appropriate market research
publications. Management reviews service-provided values for reasonableness by comparing market
yields indicated by the supplied value to yields observed in the market place. If a value does not
appear reasonable, the valuation is discussed with the service that provided the value and would be
adjusted, if necessary. No such adjustments have been necessary in 2011 or 2010.
14
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Below is a summary description of the valuation methodologies primarily used by the pricing
services for securities in the Level 2 category, by security type:
U.S. Treasury obligations are valued based on quoted prices for identical assets, or, in
markets that are not active, quotes for similar assets, taking into consideration adjustments for
variations in contractual cash flows and yields to maturity.
U. S. government and agency obligations, and corporate bonds (exclusive of privately placed
debt) are valued using pricing models that consider current and historical market data, normal
trading conventions, credit ratings, and the particular structure and characteristics of the
security being valued, such as yield to maturity, redemption options, and contractual cash flows.
Adjustments to model inputs or model results are included in the valuation process when necessary
to reflect recent events, such as regulatory, government or corporate actions or significant
economic, industry or geographic events that would affect the securitys fair value.
Municipal securities are valued using a series of matrices that consider credit ratings, the
structure of the security, the sector in which the security falls, yields, and contractual cash
flows. Valuations are further adjusted, when necessary, to reflect recent events such as
significant economic or geographic events or ratings changes that would affect the securitys fair
value.
Mortgage backed securities. Agency pass through securities are valued by a matrix, considering
the issuer type, coupon rate and longest cash flows outstanding. The matrix is developed daily
based on available market information. Agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations
are both valued using models that consider the structure of the security, current and historical
information regarding prepayment speeds, ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical
interest rate and interest rate spread data. Evaluations of Alt-A and subprime mortgages include a
review of collateral performance data, which is generally updated monthly.
Asset-backed securities are valued using models that consider the structure of the security,
monthly payment information, current and historical information regarding prepayment speeds,
ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical interest rate and interest rate spread
data. Spreads and prepayment speeds consider collateral type.
Privately placed corporate debt is valued by an outside vendor rather than a third party
pricing service. The valuation is prepared based on a widely available matrix that is produced
daily by a leading seller of secondary private placements. The matrix considers the market sector,
issuer credit ratings and the remaining loan term and is developed from market data such as
interest rate yield curves, credit spreads, quoted market prices for comparable securities and
other applicable market data.
Bank loans are also valued by an outside vendor. The valuation is based upon a widely
distributed, loan-specific listing of average bid and ask prices published daily by an investment
industry group. The publisher of the listing derives the averages from data received from multiple
market-makers for bank loans.
Short term securities, primarily U. S. Treasury securities and commercial paper maturing
within one year, are carried at cost which approximates the fair value of the security due to the
short term to maturity.
Below is a summary description of the valuation methodologies used to value securities in the
Level 3 category by security type.
Auction rate municipal bonds are valued internally using a model based on discounted cash
flows using yields currently available on fixed rate securities with a similar term and collateral,
adjusted to consider the effect of a floating rate and a premium for illiquidity. All are rated A
or better.
15
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Corporate debt instruments are valued internally using dealer quotes for similar securities or
discounted cash flow models using yields currently available for similar securities. Similar
securities are defined as securities having like terms and payment features that are of comparable
credit quality. Assessments of credit quality are based on NRSRO ratings, if available, or are
subjectively determined by management if not available. At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Level 3 corporate debt instruments include private placement senior notes which are unconditionally
guaranteed by large regional banks; other corporate debt securities in the Level 3 category are not guaranteed or fully collateralized. At June 30, 2011, the average NRSRO rating of rated securities is BBB.
Asset-backed securities are valued using multiple inputs including multiple broker dealer
quotes.
Interests in private investment funds are valued using the net asset value provided by the
fund.
The following table provides additional information regarding investments in private
investment funds valued using the net asset value provided by the fund at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
Private fund primarily invested in long/short equities (1) |
|
$ |
18,152 |
|
|
$ |
18,801 |
|
|
None |
Private fund primarily invested in non-public equities,
including other private funds (2) |
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,127 |
|
|
$ |
25,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fund holds both long and short U.S. and North American equities, and
targets absolute returns using a strategy designed to take advantage of
event-driven market opportunities. Redemptions are allowed with a notice
requirement of up to 45 days and are paid within 30 days of the redemption date,
unless the redemption request is for 90% or more of the requestors capital
balance. Redemptions at the 90% and above level will be paid at 90%, with the
remainder paid after the funds annual audit. |
|
(2) |
|
The fund is structured to provide capital appreciation through diversified
investments in private equity, including investments in buyout, venture capital,
mezzanine, distressed debt and other private equity-oriented funds. Redemptions are
not allowed, except by special permission of the fund. Fund proceeds are to be
periodically distributed at the discretion of the fund over an anticipated time
frame that spans 3 to 5 years. |
16
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The following tables present summary information regarding changes in the fair value of assets
and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs, including financial instruments for
which ProAssurance has elected fair value accounting. Transfers are as of the end of the period,
unless otherwise specified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Assets |
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,450 |
|
|
$ |
16,880 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,662 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,992 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized and
unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535 |
) |
Net realized investment gains
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,436 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,205 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
7,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the above
period for Level 3 assets held at
period-end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Assets |
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,550 |
|
|
$ |
21,229 |
|
|
$ |
2,220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,112 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,111 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized and
unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net realized investment gains
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(8,505 |
) |
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,651 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,627 |
) |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,225 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
7,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the above
period for Level 3 assets held at
period-end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 include:
|
|
|
Two corporate bonds having a combined value of $3.4 million. Multiple observable
inputs were available for use in valuing the securities at December 31, 2010. Such
information was not available for valuing the bonds at either March 31, 2011 or June
30, 2011. |
17
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 include:
|
|
|
Two asset-backed securities valued at $0.6 million. Multiple observable inputs were
available for use in valuing the securities at both March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
Such information was not available for valuing the securities at December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Five corporate bonds having a combined value of $2.4 million. Multiple observable
inputs were not available for use in valuing the securities at December 31, 2010. Such
information was available for valuing the bonds at both March 31, 2011 and June 30,
2011. |
|
|
|
|
Three corporate bonds having a combined value of $5.2 million. Multiple observable
inputs were available for use in valuing the securities at June 30, 2011. Such
information was not available for valuing the bonds at March 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Assets |
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,590 |
|
|
$ |
25,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,488 |
|
|
$ |
11,134 |
|
|
$ |
98,385 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized and
unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
Net realized investment gains
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,755 |
) |
|
|
(8,755 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,494 |
|
|
|
9,394 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
10,859 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,075 |
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,672 |
) |
|
|
(11,672 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,401 |
|
|
$ |
25,660 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,266 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
115,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the above
period for Level 3 assets held at
period-end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
(8,755 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Assets |
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,495 |
|
|
$ |
24,335 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,502 |
|
|
$ |
10,932 |
|
|
$ |
94,204 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized and
unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
Net realized investment gains
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,698 |
) |
|
|
(10,698 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
12,044 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
12,282 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,657 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,075 |
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,672 |
) |
|
|
(11,833 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,401 |
|
|
$ |
25,660 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,266 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
115,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the above
period for
Level 3 assets held at period-end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
$ |
(10,698 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,858 |
) |
|
|
|
18
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Transfers into Level 3 from Level 2 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 include:
|
|
|
A corporate bond valued at $151,000. Multiple observable inputs were not available
for use in valuing the bond at June 30, 2010. Such information was available for
valuing the bond at March 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Tax credit limited partnerships valued at $16.9 million, previously accounted for on
a cost basis, were reclassified to Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. Multiple
observable inputs were not available for use in valuing these investments at June 30,
2010. |
Transfers from Level 3 into Level 2 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 include:
|
|
|
A commercial mortgage-backed security valued at $1 million. Multiple observable
inputs were available for use in valuing the securities at June 30, 2010. Such
information was not available for valuing the bonds at March 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially owned asset-backed securities held in a private investment fund carried
in other investments were previously 100% categorized as Level 3 because valuations
were determined by the fund manager using various methodologies, not all of which were
based on multiple observable inputs. During the second quarter of 2010 the fund manager
provided additional information regarding the valuation methodologies followed, and
assets (having a combined fair value of $10.7 million) valued using multiple observable
inputs were transferred to the Level 2 category. |
|
|
|
|
A corporate bond valued at $161,000. There was no active market for the bond or a
nearly identical bond during 2009. Market activity increased during the first quarter
of 2010, which provided multiple observable inputs that could be used to value the
bond. |
19
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Liabilities |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
rate swap |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Payable |
|
|
agreement |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
15,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,415 |
|
|
$ |
18,970 |
|
Total (gains) losses realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings as a part of net
realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
15,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
|
$ |
19,715 |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (gains) losses included
in earnings for the above period for Level 3
liabilities outstanding at period-end |
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Liabilities |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
rate swap |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Payable |
|
|
agreement |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
15,616 |
|
|
$ |
3,658 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
Total (gains) losses realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings as a part of net
realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
15,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
|
$ |
19,715 |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (gains) losses included
in earnings for the above period for Level 3
liabilities outstanding at period-end |
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
|
|
20
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Liabilities |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
rate swap |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Payable |
|
|
agreement |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
15,296 |
|
|
$ |
3,175 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Total (gains) losses realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings as a part of net
realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
15,107 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
$ |
19,391 |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (gains) losses included
in earnings for the above period for Level 3
liabilities outstanding at period-end |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Liabilities |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
rate swap |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Payable |
|
|
agreement |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,740 |
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
$ |
17,677 |
|
Total (gains) losses realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings as a part of net
realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
15,107 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
$ |
19,391 |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (gains) losses included
in earnings for the above period for Level 3
liabilities outstanding at period-end |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Option Elections
The 2019 Note Payable and a related interest rate swap agreement (the Swap) are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis, with changes in the fair value of each liability recorded in net
realized gains (losses). ProAssurance assumed both liabilities as part of a previous acquisition.
The fair value option was elected for the 2019 Note Payable and the Swap because valuation at fair
value better reflects the economics of the related liabilities and eliminates the inconsistency
that would otherwise result from carrying the 2019 Note Payable on an amortized cost basis and the
Swap at fair value.
21
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
3. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
Financial Instruments Not Measured At Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
$ |
35,979 |
|
|
$ |
43,247 |
|
|
$ |
38,078 |
|
|
$ |
44,387 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
91,758 |
|
|
|
101,087 |
|
|
|
63,642 |
|
|
|
66,862 |
|
BOLI |
|
|
51,421 |
|
|
|
51,421 |
|
|
|
50,484 |
|
|
|
50,484 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities |
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Note Payable due February 2012 |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,931 |
|
|
|
18,893 |
|
|
|
22,367 |
|
|
|
21,837 |
|
Other Investments listed in the table above primarily includes investments in limited
liability partnerships, investments in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) common stock, and an annuity
investment. The fair value of the private investment fund is estimated as the net asset value
provided by the underlying fund. The fair value of the FHLB common stock is estimated as the
carrying value of the investment as it is the amount we would receive if we cancel our membership;
the investment has been determined not to have suffered an OTTI and the membership cannot be sold.
The fair value of the annuity is the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted
using a rate available in active markets for similarly structured instruments.
Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries consists primarily of investments in tax credit
partnerships, and an investment in a development stage limited liability company. Fair values of
investments in tax credit partnerships are based on the present value of the cash flows expected
to be generated by the partnerships discounted at rates for investments with similar risk
structures and repayment periods. The fair value of the interest in the development stage entity is
estimated at our initial capital contribution which occurred less than one year ago and represented
an arms length transaction between market participants.
The fair value of the BOLI is the cash surrender value associated with the policies on the
valuation date.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities primarily consist of related investment assets and
liabilities associated with funded deferred compensation agreements. Included in Other Liabilities
are also certain contractual liabilities associated with business combinations completed in 2009
and 2010. Fair values of the funded deferred compensation assets/liabilities are based on the net
asset value of the underlying securities. The fair values of the business combination liabilities
are based on the present value of the expected cash flows, discounted at ProAssurances assumed
incremental borrowing rate on the valuation date for unsecured liabilities with similar repayment
structures.
The fair value of the long-term debt is the present value of expected underlying cash
flows of the debt, discounted at rates available on the valuation date for similar debt issued by
entities with a similar credit standing to ProAssurance or, if issued by an insurance subsidiary,
the subsidiary issuing the debt.
22
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
4. Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity
securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
285,282 |
|
|
$ |
9,960 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
$ |
294,744 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
68,365 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
72,877 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1,111,660 |
|
|
|
55,247 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
1,166,168 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,304,584 |
|
|
|
57,932 |
|
|
|
(4,111 |
) |
|
|
1,358,405 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
550,437 |
|
|
|
27,450 |
|
|
|
(2,189) |
* |
|
|
575,698 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
86,127 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
90,039 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
76,246 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
77,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,482,701 |
|
|
|
160,002 |
|
|
|
(7,619 |
) |
|
|
3,635,084 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,482,838 |
|
|
$ |
160,020 |
|
|
$ |
(7,619 |
) |
|
$ |
3,635,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
219,631 |
|
|
$ |
7,519 |
|
|
$ |
(1,242 |
) |
|
$ |
225,908 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
64,804 |
|
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
68,878 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1,204,327 |
|
|
|
44,047 |
|
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
1,243,924 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,287,842 |
|
|
|
52,757 |
|
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
1,333,264 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
549,543 |
|
|
|
25,409 |
|
|
|
(5,114) |
* |
|
|
569,838 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
95,758 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
99,386 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
61,314 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
62,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,483,219 |
|
|
|
138,881 |
|
|
|
(18,346 |
) |
|
|
3,603,754 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,485,657 |
|
|
$ |
140,093 |
|
|
$ |
(18,359 |
) |
|
$ |
3,607,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes other-than-temporary impairments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income of $3.4 million at June 30, 2011 and $4.1 million at December 31, 2010. |
The recorded cost basis and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed
maturities at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ
from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment penalties. ProAssurance uses the call date as the contractual
maturity for pre-refunded state and municipal bonds which are 100% backed by U.S. Treasury
obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or |
|
|
Due after one year |
|
|
years through ten |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
less |
|
|
through five years |
|
|
years |
|
|
ten years |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
285,282 |
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
$ |
173,415 |
|
|
$ |
97,580 |
|
|
$ |
3,678 |
|
|
$ |
294,744 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
68,365 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
40,050 |
|
|
|
29,491 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
72,877 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1,111,660 |
|
|
|
34,363 |
|
|
|
326,371 |
|
|
|
559,048 |
|
|
|
246,386 |
|
|
|
1,166,168 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,304,584 |
|
|
|
140,256 |
|
|
|
690,758 |
|
|
|
508,789 |
|
|
|
18,602 |
|
|
|
1,358,405 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
550,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,698 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
86,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,039 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
76,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,482,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,635,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
4. Investments (continued)
Excluding investments in bonds and notes of the U.S. Government, a U.S. Government agency, or
pre-refunded state and municipal bonds which are 100% backed by U.S. Treasury obligations, no
investment in any entity or its affiliates exceeded 10% of shareholders equity at June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, ProAssurance has available-for-sale securities with a fair value of $28.1
million on deposit with various state insurance departments to meet regulatory requirements.
ProAssurance also has available-for-sale securities with a fair value of $27.4 million that are
pledged as collateral security for the 2019 Note Payable (see Note 9).
Business Owned Life Insurance (BOLI)
ProAssurance holds BOLI policies on management employees that are carried at the current cash
surrender value of the policies (original cost $35 million). The primary purpose of the program is
to offset future employee benefit expenses through earnings on the cash value of the policies.
ProAssurance is the owner and principal beneficiary of these policies.
Other Investments
ProAssurance has Other Investments comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Equity interests in private investment funds, at cost; estimated fair value of $36.8 and
$37.5, respectively |
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
FHLB capital stock, at cost |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Other, principally an annuity, at amortized cost |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
|
|
|
FHLB capital stock is not marketable, but may be liquidated by terminating membership in
the FHLB. The liquidation process can take up to five years.
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
ProAssurance holds investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, accounted for under the equity
method. The investments include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Percentage Ownership |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in tax credit partnerships |
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
|
$ |
60.3 |
|
|
|
<20 |
% |
Other business interest |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
<50 |
% |
Private investment fund-primarily
invested in long/short equities |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
<20 |
% |
Private investment fund-primarily
invested in non-public equities |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
<20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in tax credit partnerships are comprised of multiple separate limited
partnership interests designed to generate investment returns by providing tax benefits to fund
investors in the form of project operating losses and tax credits. The related properties are
principally low income housing projects. The $90.0 million carrying value in the partnerships
reflects the commitments to the partnerships (less amortization) of which approximately $61 million
was not yet funded as of June 30, 2011.
The other business interest is a non-controlling interest in a development stage limited
liability company. The start-up phase is expected to continue through 2011 and into 2012.
24
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
4. Investments (continued)
The long/short equity fund targets absolute returns using a strategy designed to take
advantage of event-driven market opportunities.
The non-public equity fund holds diversified private equities and is structured to provide
capital appreciation.
Investments Held in a Loss Position
The following tables provide summarized information with respect to investments held in an
unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, including the length of time the
investment has been held in a continuous unrealized loss position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
47,652 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
$ |
47,652 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
49,072 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
41,142 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
7,930 |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
180,392 |
|
|
|
(4,111 |
) |
|
|
177,534 |
|
|
|
(3,559 |
) |
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
61,285 |
|
|
|
(2,189 |
) |
|
|
52,857 |
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
8,428 |
|
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
8,874 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358,485 |
|
|
$ |
(7,619 |
) |
|
$ |
335,840 |
|
|
$ |
(5,207 |
) |
|
$ |
22,645 |
|
|
$ |
(2,412 |
) |
|
|
|
Equity securities, available for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interests in private
investment funds carried at cost of
$0.9 million |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
$ |
(1,242 |
) |
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
$ |
(1,242 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
199,079 |
|
|
|
(4,450 |
) |
|
|
191,157 |
|
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
|
|
7,922 |
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
287,418 |
|
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
275,808 |
|
|
|
(5,695 |
) |
|
|
11,610 |
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
121,956 |
|
|
|
(5,114 |
) |
|
|
105,193 |
|
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
16,763 |
|
|
|
(3,187 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
7,507 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
11,692 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
11,246 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
695,119 |
|
|
$ |
(18,346 |
) |
|
$ |
657,408 |
|
|
$ |
(12,904 |
) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
$ |
(5,442 |
) |
|
|
|
Equity securities, available for sale |
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interests in private
investment funds carried at cost of
$19.7 million |
|
$ |
19,298 |
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,298 |
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, there were 228 debt securities (8.9% of all available-for-sale fixed
maturity securities held) in an unrealized loss position representing 174 issuers. The single
greatest unrealized loss position is approximately $0.8 million; the second greatest unrealized
loss position is approximately $0.4 million. The securities were evaluated for impairment as of
June 30, 2011.
As of December 31, 2010, there were 510 debt securities (19% of all available-for-sale fixed
maturity securities held) in an unrealized loss position representing 309 issuers. The single
greatest unrealized loss position approximated $0.8 million; the second greatest unrealized loss
position approximated $0.6 million. The securities were evaluated for impairment as of December 31,
2010.
25
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
4. Investments (continued)
Each quarter, ProAssurance performs a detailed analysis for the purpose of assessing whether
any of the securities it holds in an unrealized loss position have suffered an other-than-temporary
impairment
in value. A detailed discussion of the factors considered in the assessment is included in Note 1
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in ProAssurances December 31, 2010
Form 10-K.
At June 30, 2011 fixed maturity securities held in an unrealized loss position, excluding
asset-backed securities, have paid all scheduled contractual payments and are expected to continue
doing so. Expected future cash flows of asset-backed securities were estimated using the most
recently available six-month historical performance data for the collateral (loans) underlying the
security or, if historical data was not available, sector based assumptions.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income by investment category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
36,682 |
|
|
$ |
36,700 |
|
|
$ |
72,634 |
|
|
$ |
74,396 |
|
Equities |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,932 |
|
|
|
38,466 |
|
|
|
75,623 |
|
|
|
77,443 |
|
Investment expenses |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(3,166 |
) |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
36,297 |
|
|
$ |
37,081 |
|
|
$ |
72,457 |
|
|
$ |
74,709 |
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
Net realized investment gains (losses) are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(769 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interest in a private investment fund |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
(3,373 |
) |
High yield asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,983 |
) |
Portion recognized in (reclassified from) Other Comprehensive
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
High yield asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(7,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,583 |
) |
|
|
(12,373 |
) |
Gross realized gains, available-for-sale securities |
|
|
5,664 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
10,292 |
|
|
|
10,097 |
|
Gross realized (losses), available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
Net realized gains (losses), short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses), trading securities |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses), trading securities |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(7,397 |
) |
|
|
(1,341 |
) |
|
|
(6,462 |
) |
Increase in the fair value of liabilities carried at fair value |
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
(3,501 |
) |
|
$ |
6,324 |
|
|
$ |
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
|
ProAssurance recognized impairments of $2.1 million in 2011 related to an interest in a
private investment fund, accounted for on a cost basis. The fund has notified ProAssurance of its
intention to be sold publicly in the next few months, and the Company has reduced the carrying
value of its interest in the fund to reflect the expected market value of the assets.
26
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
4. Investments (continued)
ProAssurance recognized credit-related impairments in earnings of $1.5 million in 2011,
related to residential mortgage-backed securities. Expected future cash flows were less than
ProAssurances carrying value for these securities; therefore, ProAssurance reduced the carrying
value of its interest in these securities and recognized the loss in its 2011 net income.
The following table presents a roll forward of cumulative credit losses recorded in earnings
related to impaired debt securities for which a portion of the other-than-temporary impairment has
been recorded in Other Comprehensive Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Balance beginning of period |
|
$ |
5,334 |
|
|
$ |
4,446 |
|
Additional credit losses recognized during the period, related to securities for which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No OTTI has been previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI has been previously recognized |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Reductions due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold during the period (realized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities which will be sold in coming periods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities for which it is more likely than not that the security will be required
to be sold prior to anticipated recovery of amortized cost basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion recognized during the period related to cash flows that are expected to
exceed the amortized cost basis of the security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
5,728 |
|
|
$ |
5,728 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale securities during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 are $141.4 million and $310.9 million, respectively, as compared to $248.4
million and $393.3 million for the same respective periods of 2010. Purchases of available-for-sale
securities are $200.7 million and $452.7 million during the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to $219.9 million and $458.3 million for the same respective
periods of 2010.
5. Income Taxes
ProAssurance estimates its annual effective tax rate at the end of each quarterly reporting
period which is used to record the provision for income taxes in the interim financial statements.
The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the
statutory Federal income tax rate to income before taxes primarily because a portion of
ProAssurances investment income is tax-exempt.
ProAssurance files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. The
Internal Revenue Service has completed an examination of the Companys 2005 through 2008 returns
(the 2005-2008 exam) and has begun an examination of the 2009 return. The 2005-2008 exam
principally resulted in delaying the deductibility of certain bonus compensation which increased
taxes due for the 2007 and 2008 tax years but decreased taxes due for the 2009 tax year by an
offsetting amount, the effect of which had previously been recorded as an uncertain tax position.
The 2005-2008 exam resulted in no adjustment to tax expense (exclusive of interest accruals) and no
penalties or fines. Upon finalization of the 2005-2008 exam, uncertain tax positions totaling $8.3
million were deemed effectively settled and were reversed (along with approximately $324,000 of
related accrued interest) in the first quarter of 2011. The Companys Illinois state tax returns
for the years 2006 through 2008 are currently under examination by the Illinois Department of
Revenue.
ProAssurances liability for unrecognized tax benefits is $253,000 at June 30, 2011 and $8.3
million at December 31, 2010.
27
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
6. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, most significantly commissions, premium taxes, and underwriting
salaries, that are primarily and directly related to the production of new and renewal premiums are
capitalized as policy acquisition costs and amortized to expense as the related premium revenues
are earned.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs are $14.6 million and $29.0 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $14.7 million and $29.0 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
7. Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The reserve for losses is established based on estimates of individual claims and actuarially
determined estimates of future losses based on ProAssurances past loss experience, available
industry data and projections as to future claims frequency, severity, inflationary trends and
settlement patterns. Estimating reserves, and particularly liability reserves, is a complex
process. Claims may be resolved over an extended period of time, often five years or more, and may
be subject to litigation. Estimating losses for liability claims requires ProAssurance to make and
revise judgments and assessments regarding multiple uncertainties over an extended period of time.
As a result, reserve estimates may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. The assumptions
used in establishing ProAssurances reserves are regularly reviewed and updated by management as
new data becomes available. Changes to estimates of previously established reserves are included in
earnings in the period in which the estimate is changed.
ProAssurance recognized favorable net loss development of $50.2 million and $90.2 million
related to previously established reserves for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively. The favorable net loss development reflects reductions in the Companys estimates of
claims severity, principally for the 2004 through 2009 accident years.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, ProAssurance recognized favorable net loss
development of $37.5 million and $62.5 million, respectively, to reflect reductions in estimated
claim severity principally for accident years 2004 through 2008.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
ProAssurance is involved in various legal actions related to insurance policies and claims
handling including, but not limited to, claims asserted by policyholders. ProAssurance has
considered such legal actions in establishing its loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. The
outcome of any individual legal action is not presently determinable for a number of reasons. For
example, in the event that ProAssurance or its insureds receive adverse verdicts, post-trial
motions may result in unfavorable rulings; any appeals that may be undertaken may be unsuccessful;
ProAssurance may be unsuccessful in legal efforts to limit the scope of coverage available to its
insureds; and ProAssurance may become a party to bad faith litigation over the payment of any
judgment above an insureds policy limits. ProAssurances management is of the opinion, based on
consultation with legal counsel, that the resolution of these actions will not have a material
adverse effect on ProAssurances financial position. However, the ultimate cost of resolving these
legal actions may differ from the reserves established, and the resulting difference could have a
material effect on ProAssurances results of operations for the period in which any such action is
resolved.
As a result of its acquisition of APS, ProAssurance assumed risk of loss related to certain
non-claims related legal actions previously asserted against APS subsidiaries. ProAssurance
included a liability of $5.6 million related to these actions as a component of the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the purchase price allocation. The value of the reserve
was based on managements assessment of the expected outcome of the actions and a reasonable
estimate of losses expected to be incurred. In the best judgment of management the reserve amount
continues to be adequate, and expected ultimate losses, net of estimated recoveries, are not
expected to exceed the reserve amount.
28
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
8. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
ProAssurance has commitments to fund $61 million in capital contributions to tax credit
partnerships. Funding of the commitments is primarily expected to occur in 2011 and 2012;
additional information regarding tax credit partnership investments is provided in Note 4.
ProAssurance has also entered into agreements with several limited liability partnerships, totaling
approximately $54 million at June 30, 2011, to be funded within the next five years as requested by
the partnership.
9. Long-term Debt
ProAssurances outstanding long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities due 2034,
unsecured. Bears interest at a variable
rate of LIBOR plus 3.85%, adjusted
quarterly (4.1% at June 30, 2011). |
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034, unsecured.
Bears interest at a variable rate of LIBOR
plus 3.85%, adjusted quarterly (4.1% at
June 30, 2011). |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Note Payable due February 2019, carried at
fair value, principal of $17.3 million at
June 30, 2011 and $17.4 million at
December 31, 2010. Secured by
available-for-sale securities having a
fair value at June 30, 2011 of
approximately $27.4 million. Bears
interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus
0.7%. See information below regarding the
associated interest rate swap. |
|
|
15,863 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
Note Payable due February 2012, unsecured,
principal of $517,000 net of an
unamortized discount of $11,000 at June
30, 2011 and $21,000 at December 31, 2010.
Bears interest at the U.S. prime rate,
paid and adjusted quarterly (3.3% at June
30, 2011). |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,361 |
|
|
$ |
51,104 |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap
ProAssurance, through its PICA subsidiary, is party to an interest rate swap agreement (the
Swap) with the issuing bank of the Note Payable due February 2019 (the 2019 Note Payable). The
purpose of the Swap is to reduce the market risk from changes in future interest rates relative to
the 2019 Note Payable. The Swap, which terminates February 1, 2019, effectively fixes the interest
rate related to the 2019 Note Payable at 6.6%. The notional amount of the Swap corresponds directly
to the unamortized portion of the debt being hedged each month. Under the Swap agreement, PICA
agrees to exchange, at monthly intervals, the difference between the fixed-rate and LIBOR variable
rate by reference to the notional principal amount. The liability associated with the Swap is
measured at fair value on a recurring basis which approximates $3.9 million at June 30, 2011 and
$3.7 million at December 31, 2010. The Swap liability is classified as a part of other liabilities.
Revolving Credit Agreement
On April 15, 2011 ProAssurance entered into a revolving credit agreement (the Agreement)
with five participating lenders. The Agreement permits ProAssurance to borrow, repay and reborrow
from the lenders during the term of the Agreement; aggregate outstanding borrowings are not
permitted to exceed $150 million at any time. All borrowings are required to be repaid prior to the
expiration date of the Agreement (April 15, 2014). ProAssurance will pay a commitment fee during
the term of the agreement, initially set at 25 basis points, based on the average unused portion of the
credit line and ProAssurances credit ratings. The interest rate applicable to borrowings under the
Agreement will
29
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
9. Long-term Debt (continued)
depend upon ProAssurances credit ratings at the time funds are borrowed, and on whether the
borrowing is secured or unsecured. The Agreement contains customary representations, covenants and
events constituting default, and remedies for default. Additionally, the Agreement carries the
following financial covenants:
|
(1) |
|
ProAssurance is not permitted to have a leverage ratio of Consolidated Funded
Indebtedness (principally, obligations for borrowed money, obligations evidenced by
instruments such as notes or acceptances, standby and commercial Letters of Credit,
and contingent obligations) to Consolidated Total Capitalization (principally, total
non-trade liabilities on a consolidated basis plus consolidated shareholders equity,
exclusive of accumulated other comprehensive income) greater than 0.35 to 1.0,
determined at the end of each fiscal quarter. |
|
|
(2) |
|
ProAssurance is required to maintain a minimum net worth of not less than the
sum of 75% of Consolidated Net Worth (consolidated shareholders equity, exclusive of
accumulated other comprehensive income) at December 31, 2010, plus 50% of consolidated
net income earned each fiscal quarter, if positive, beginning with the quarter ending
March 31, 2011, plus 100% of net cash proceeds resulting from the issuance of
ProAssurance capital stock. |
Funds borrowed under the terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement will be used for general corporate
purposes, including, but not limited to, use as short-term working capital, funding for share
repurchases as authorized by the Board, and for support of other activities ProAssurance enters
into in the normal course of business. To date, ProAssurance has not borrowed any funds under the
Agreement.
Covenant Compliance
ProAssurance is currently in compliance with all covenants.
Additional Information
For additional information regarding the terms of ProAssurances outstanding long-term debt,
see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in ProAssurances
December 31, 2010 Form 10-K.
10. Shareholders Equity
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ProAssurance had 100 million shares of authorized
common stock and 50 million shares of authorized preferred stock. The Board of Directors of
ProAssurance Corporation (the Board) has the authority to determine provisions for the issuance of
preferred shares, including the number of shares to be issued, the designations, powers,
preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such shares. To
date, the Board has not approved the issuance of preferred stock.
At June 30, 2011 approximately $194.0 million in prior authorizations from the Board for the
repurchase of common shares or the retirement of outstanding debt remains available for use. The
timing and quantity of purchases depends upon market conditions and changes in ProAssurances
capital requirements and is subject to limitations that may be imposed on such purchases by
applicable securities laws and regulations, and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
ProAssurance reacquired approximately 259,000 common shares, having a total cost of $15.4
million, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, all in the
first quarter, including 7,000 forfeited employer match shares (cost basis of $444,000) reacquired due to the termination of the ProAssurance Corporation Stock Ownership Plan.
ProAssurance repurchased approximately 674,000 common shares, having a total cost of $39.2 million,
during the six months ended June 30, 2010, all in the second quarter.
30
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
10. Shareholders Equity (continued)
Share-based compensation expense is $2.0 million and $3.7 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $1.5 million and $2.9 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Related tax benefits are $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
ProAssurance granted approximately 20,000 restricted share units to employees in February
2011. The awards 100% vest three years from the grant date, based on a continued service
requirement. The fair value of each unit was estimated at $64.08, equal to the market value of a
ProAssurance common share on the date of grant.
ProAssurance awarded approximately 93,000 (target) performance share units to employees in
February 2011. The awards 100% vest at the end of a three-year period if the service requirements
are met and minimum performance goals are achieved. If minimum performance goals are achieved, the
payment of awards can vary from 75% to 125% of set targets depending upon the degree to which the
performance goals are achieved. The fair value of each award was estimated at $64.08, equal to the
market value of a ProAssurance common share on the date of grant. ProAssurance issued approximately
52,000 common shares to employees in February 2011 related to performance share awards granted in
2008. The awards were issued at the maximum level (125% of target) based on performance levels
achieved. Cash was given in lieu of shares sufficient to satisfy required tax withholdings.
ProAssurance issued approximately 20,000 and 40,000 common shares to employees in February
2011 and February 2010, respectively, as bonus compensation, as approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board. The shares issued were valued at fair value (the market price of a
ProAssurance common share on the date of award).
In late 2010 ProAssurance terminated the ProAssurance Corporation Stock Ownership Plan and
established the ProAssurance Corporation 2011 Stock Ownership Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan,
eligible employees and directors of ProAssurance and its subsidiaries are given the opportunity to
annually contribute up to $5,000 to be used each October for the purchase of ProAssurance common
shares. For each share so purchased, ProAssurance will award a matching restricted stock unit to
the participant. The restricted stock units will vest at the end of a three-year period subject to
a continuous service requirement and be ratably charged to expense over the vesting period.
11. Earnings Per Share
Diluted weighted average shares is calculated as basic weighted average shares plus the
effect, calculated using the treasury stock method, of assuming that dilutive stock options have
been exercised and that performance share awards and restricted stock units have vested.
Stock options are not dilutive when the option exercise price exceeds the average price of a
common share during the period or when the result from assuming an option is exercised is a net
decrease to outstanding shares. All outstanding options were dilutive
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, and for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010. Approximately
116,000 of ProAssurances outstanding options, on average, were not dilutive for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2010.
31
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
12. Variable Interest Entities
ProAssurance holds passive interests in a number of limited partnerships/limited liability
companies that are considered to be Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) under GAAP guidance.
ProAssurance has not consolidated these entities because it has either very limited or no power to
control the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of these entities
and is thus not the primary beneficiary of any of the entities. ProAssurances involvement with
each entity is limited to its direct ownership interest in the entity. ProAssurance has no
arrangements or agreements with any of the entities to provide other financial support to or on
behalf of the entity. ProAssurances maximum loss exposure relative to these investments is limited
to the carrying value of ProAssurances investment in the entity.
The entities consist of 1) private investment funds formed for the purpose of achieving
diversified equity and debt returns, 2) private investment funds formed to provide investment
returns through the transfer of tax credits (principally federal or state tax credits related to
federal low-income housing) and 3) a limited liability interest in a development stage business
operation. In those instances where ProAssurance holds a minor interest in the entity, ProAssurance
accounts for its interest on a cost basis. Cost basis investments are included in Other Investments
and have a carrying value of $29.6 million and $31.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. In those instances where ProAssurance holds a greater than minor interest,
ProAssurance accounts for its interest using the equity method. Equity method investments are
included in Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and have a carrying value of $116.9 million
at June 30, 2011 and $88.8 million at December 31, 2010.
32
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to those statements which accompany this report as well
as our 2010 Form 10-K. A glossary of insurance terms and phrases is available on the investor
section of our website. Throughout the discussion, references to ProAssurance, PRA, Company,
we, us and our refer to ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The
discussion contains certain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. As
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements, our actual financial condition and operating results
could differ significantly from these forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Preparation of these financial statements requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts we report on those statements. We evaluate
these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based on current and historical developments,
market conditions, industry trends and other information that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform to our estimates and
assumptions; reported results of operations may be materially affected by changes in these
estimates and assumptions.
Management considers the following accounting estimates to be critical because they involve
significant judgment by management and the effect of those judgments could result in a material
effect on our financial statements.
Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses (reserve for losses or reserve)
The largest component of our liabilities is our reserve for losses, and the largest component
of expense for our operations is incurred losses. Incurred losses reported in any period reflect
our estimate of losses incurred related to the premiums earned in that period as well as any
changes to our estimates of the reserve established for losses of prior periods.
The estimation of professional liability losses is inherently difficult. Loss costs, even for
claims with similar characteristics, can vary significantly depending upon many factors, including
but not limited to: the nature of the claim and the personal situation of the claimant or the
claimants family, the outcome of jury trials, the legislative and judicial climate where the
insured event occurred, general economic conditions and, for medical professional liability, the
trend of health care costs. Professional liability claims are typically resolved over an extended
period of time, often five years or more. The combination of changing conditions and the extended
time required for claim resolution results in a loss cost estimation process that requires
actuarial skill and the application of judgment, and such estimates require periodic revision. Our
reserves are established by management after taking into consideration a variety of factors
including premium rates, claims frequency, historical paid and incurred loss development trends,
the effect of inflation, general economic trends, the legal and political environment, and the
conclusions reached by our internal actuaries.
We update and review the data underlying the estimation of our reserve for losses each
reporting period and make adjustments to loss estimation assumptions that we believe best reflect
emerging data. Our internal actuaries perform an in-depth review of our reserve for losses on at
least a semi-annual basis using the loss and exposure data of our insurance subsidiaries. We also
engage consulting actuaries to review our data semi-annually and provide us with their observations
regarding our data and the adequacy of our established reserve, believing that the consulting
actuaries provide an independent view of our loss data as well as a broader perspective on industry
loss trends.
33
Any adjustments resulting from our review process are reflected in the then-current
operations. Due to the size of our reserve for losses, even a small percentage adjustment to these
estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the
adjustment is made, as was the case in 2010 and has been thus far in 2011.
Reinsurance
We use insurance and reinsurance (collectively, reinsurance) to provide capacity to write
larger limits of liability, to provide protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to
stabilize underwriting results in years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance
does not relieve us from the ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement for
certain losses we pay.
We evaluate each of our ceded reinsurance contracts at inception to confirm that there is
sufficient risk transfer to allow the contract to be accounted for as reinsurance under current
accounting guidance. At June 30, 2011 all ceded contracts are accounted for as risk transferring
contracts.
Our receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represents our
estimate of the amount of our reserve for losses that will be recoverable under our reinsurance
programs. We base our estimate of funds recoverable upon our expectation of ultimate losses and the
portion of those losses that we estimate to be allocable to reinsurers based upon the terms of our
reinsurance agreements. Our assessment of the collectability of the recorded amounts receivable
from reinsurers considers the payment history of the reinsurer, publicly available financial and
rating agency data, our interpretation of the underlying contracts and policies, and responses by
reinsurers. Appropriate reserves are established for any balances we believe may not be collected.
Given the uncertainty of the ultimate amounts of our losses, our estimates of losses and
related amounts recoverable may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. Also, we estimate
premiums ceded under reinsurance agreements wherein the premium due to the reinsurer, subject to
certain maximums and minimums, is based in part on losses reimbursed or to be reimbursed under the
agreement. Any adjustments are reflected in then-current operations. Due to the size of our
reinsurance balances, an adjustment to these estimates could have a material effect on our results
of operations for the period in which the adjustment is made.
Our risk retention level is dependent upon numerous factors including our risk tolerance and
the capital we have to support it, the price and availability of reinsurance, volume of business,
level of experience with a particular set of claims and our analysis of the potential underwriting
results within each state. We purchase reinsurance from a number of companies to mitigate
concentrations of credit risk. We utilize a reinsurance broker to assist us in the analysis of the
credit quality of our reinsurers. We base our reinsurance buying decisions on an evaluation of the
then-current financial strength, rating and stability of prospective reinsurers. However, the
financial strength of our reinsurers, and their corresponding ability to pay us, may change in the
future due to forces or events we cannot control or anticipate.
We have not experienced significant collection difficulties due to the financial condition of
any reinsurer; however, periodically, reinsurers may dispute our claim for reimbursement from them.
We have established appropriate reserves for any balances that we believe may not be ultimately
collected. Should future events lead us to believe that any reinsurer will not meet its obligations
to us, adjustments to the amounts recoverable would be reflected in the results of current
operations. Such an adjustment has the potential to be material to the results of operations in the
period in which it is recorded; however, we would not expect such an adjustment to have a material
effect on our capital position or our liquidity.
Investment Valuations
We record a substantial portion of our investments at fair value as shown in the table below.
The distribution of our investments based on GAAP fair value hierarchies (levels) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Cost or cash surrender value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
All of our fixed maturity and equity securities investments are carried at fair value. Our
short-term securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Because of the number of securities we own and the complexity and cost of developing accurate
fair values internally, we utilize independent pricing services to assist us in establishing fair
values. The pricing services provide fair values based on exchange traded prices, if available. If
an exchange traded price is not available, the pricing services, if possible, provide a fair value
that is based on multiple broker/dealer quotes or that has been developed using pricing models.
Pricing models vary by asset class and utilize currently available market data for securities
comparable to ours to estimate the fair value for our security. The pricing services scrutinize
market data for consistency with other relevant market information before including the data in the
pricing models. The pricing services disclose the types of pricing models used and the inputs used
for each asset class. Determining fair values using these pricing models requires the use of
judgment to identify appropriate comparable securities and to choose valuation methodology that is
appropriate for the asset class and available data.
The pricing services provide a single value per instrument quoted. We review the values
provided for reasonableness each quarter by comparing market yields generated by the supplied price
versus market yields observed in the market place. If a supplied value is deemed unreasonable, we
discuss the valuation in question with the pricing service and will make adjustments if deemed
necessary. To date, we have not adjusted any values supplied by the pricing services.
The pricing services do not provide a fair value unless an exchange traded price or multiple
observable inputs are available. As a result, the pricing services may provide a fair value for a
security in some periods but not others, depending upon the level of recent market activity for the
security or comparable securities.
Level 1 Investments
As of June 30, 2011, fair values for our equity and a portion of our short-term securities
have been determined using an exchange traded price. There is little judgment involved when fair
value is determined using an exchange traded price. In accordance with GAAP, for disclosure
purposes we classify securities valued using an exchange traded price as Level 1 securities.
Level 2 Investments
With the exception of certain government bonds, most fixed income securities do not trade
daily and thus exchange traded prices are generally not available for these securities. However,
market information (often referred to as observable inputs or market data; including but not
limited to, last reported trade, non-binding broker quotes, bids, benchmark yield curves, issuer
spreads, two sided markets, benchmark securities, offers, and recent data regarding assumed
prepayment speeds, cash flow and loan performance data) is available for most of our fixed income
securities. We determine fair value for a large portion of our fixed income securities using
available market information. In accordance with GAAP, for disclosure purposes we classify any
securities that have been valued based on multiple market observable inputs as Level 2 securities.
Level 3 Investments
When a pricing service does not provide a value, management estimates fair value using either
a single non-binding broker quote or pricing models that utilize market based assumptions which
have limited observable inputs. The process involves significant judgment in selecting the
appropriate data and modeling techniques to use in the valuation process. In accordance with GAAP,
for disclosure purposes we classify securities that are valued using limited observable inputs as
Level 3 securities.
We hold interests in private investment funds which hold debt and equity securities. We value
these investments, which at June 30, 2011 total $25.1 million or less than 1% of total investments,
based on quarterly net asset values provided to us by fund managers, which approximate fair value.
In accordance with GAAP, for disclosure purposes we classify interests valued in this manner as
Level 3 securities.
35
Other Investments
Our investments that are not valued at fair value include:
|
|
|
Interests in private investment funds having a carrying value of $29.6
million at June 30, 2011; valued at cost. |
|
|
|
|
Business owned life insurance policies having a carrying value of $51.4
million at June 30, 2011, valued at cash surrender value. |
|
|
|
|
Interests in tax credit partnerships having a carrying value of
approximately $90.0 million at June 30, 2011; valued under the equity method. |
|
|
|
|
An other business interest that has a carrying value of $1.8 million at June
30, 2011; valued under the equity method based on the latest financial
statements of the entity. |
|
|
|
|
FHLB capital stock having a carrying value of $4.7 million at June 30, 2011;
valued at cost. |
|
|
|
|
Other investments having a carrying value at $1.7 million at June 30, 2011;
valued at cost. |
Investment Impairments
We evaluate our investments on at least a quarterly basis for declines in fair value that
represent other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI). In all instances we consider an impairment to be
an other-than-temporary impairment if we intend to sell the security or if we believe we will be
required to sell the security before we fully recover the amortized cost basis of the security.
Otherwise, we consider various factors in our evaluation, depending upon the type of security, as
discussed below.
For equity securities, we consider the following:
|
|
|
the length of time for which the fair value of the investment has been less
than its recorded basis; |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer underlying the
investment, taking into consideration the economic prospects of the issuers
industry and geographical region, to the extent that information is publicly
available; |
|
|
|
|
the historical and implied volatility of the fair value of the security; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. |
For debt securities, we consider whether we expect to fully recover the amortized cost basis
of the security, based upon consideration of some or all of the following:
|
|
|
third party research and credit rating reports; |
|
|
|
|
the current credit standing of the issuer, including credit rating downgrades; |
|
|
|
|
extent to which the decline in fair value is attributable to credit risk
specifically associated with an investment or its issuer; |
|
|
|
|
our internal assessments and those of our external portfolio managers
regarding specific circumstances surrounding an investment, which can cause us
to believe the investment is more or less likely to recover its value than
other investments with a similar structure; |
|
|
|
|
for asset-backed securities, the origination date of the underlying loans,
the remaining average life, the probability that credit performance of the
underlying loans will deteriorate in the future, and our assessment of the
quality of the collateral underlying the loan; |
|
|
|
|
failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or
principal payments; |
|
|
|
|
any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; |
|
|
|
|
recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance
sheet date; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. |
In assessing whether we expect to recover the cost basis of debt securities, particularly
asset-backed securities, we must make a number of assumptions regarding matters that will affect
the cash flows that we
expect to receive from the security in future periods. These judgments are subjective in
nature and may subsequently be proved to be inaccurate.
36
We evaluate our investments in private investment funds for OTTI by considering whether there
has been a decline in fair value below the recorded value. We receive reports from the funds at
least quarterly which provide us a net asset value (NAV) for our interest in the fund. The NAV is
based on the fair values of securities held by the fund as determined by the fund manager.
Determining whether there has been a decline in fair value involves assumptions and estimates. We
consider the most recent NAV provided, the performance of the fund relative to the market, the
stated objectives of the fund, and cash flows expected from the fund and audit results in
considering whether an OTTI exists.
Our investments in tax credit partnerships are evaluated for OTTI by comparing cash flow
projections of future operating results of the underlying projects generating the tax credits to
our recorded basis, and considering our ability to utilize the tax credits from the investments.
We also evaluate our holdings of FHLB securities for impairment. We consider the current
capital status of the FHLB, whether the FHLB is in compliance with regulatory minimum capital
requirements, and the reported operating results of the current period.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs (primarily commissions, premium taxes and underwriting salaries)
which are directly related to the acquisition of new and renewal premiums are capitalized as
deferred policy acquisition costs and charged to expense as the related premium revenue is
recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of our deferred policy acquisition costs each reporting
period, and any amounts estimated to be unrecoverable are charged to expense in the current period.
Deferred Taxes
Deferred federal income taxes arise from the recognition of temporary differences between the
basis of assets and liabilities determined for financial reporting purposes and the basis
determined for income tax purposes. Our temporary differences principally relate to loss reserves,
unearned premiums, deferred policy acquisition costs, unrealized investment gains (losses) and
investment impairments. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax
rates expected to be in effect when such benefits are realized. We review our deferred tax assets
quarterly for impairment. If we determine that it is more likely than not that some or all of a
deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying
value of the asset. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management is required to make
certain judgments and assumptions about our future operations based on historical experience and
information as of the measurement period regarding reversal of existing temporary differences,
carryback capacity, future taxable income (including its capital and operating characteristics) and
tax planning strategies.
Goodwill
We make at least an annual assessment as to whether the value of our goodwill asset is
impaired. Management evaluates the carrying value of goodwill annually during the fourth quarter
and before the annual evaluation if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely
than not reduce the fair value below the carrying value. We evaluate goodwill as one reporting unit
because we operate in a single operating segment and our segment components are economically
similar. We estimate the fair value of our reporting unit on the evaluation date based on market
capitalization and an expected premium that would be paid to acquire control of our Company (a
control premium). We then perform a sensitivity analysis using a range of historical stock prices
and control premiums. We concluded as of our last evaluation date, October 1, 2010, that the fair
value of our reporting unit exceeded the carrying value and no adjustment to impair goodwill was
necessary.
37
Accounting Changes
We are not aware of any changes as of June 30, 2011 that would have a material impact on
ProAssurances results of operations or financial position.
Liquidity and Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Overview
ProAssurance Corporation is a holding company and is a legal entity separate and distinct from
its subsidiaries. Because it has no other business operations, dividends from its operating
subsidiaries represent a significant source of funds for its obligations, including debt service.
At June 30, 2011, we held cash and liquid investments of
approximately $97.5 million outside of our
insurance subsidiaries that are available for use without regulatory approval. Our insurance
subsidiaries, in aggregate, are permitted to pay dividends of approximately $248 million over the
course of 2011 without prior approval. However, the payment of any dividend requires prior notice
to the insurance regulator in the state of domicile and the regulator may prevent the dividend if,
in its judgment, payment of the dividend would have an adverse effect on the surplus of the
insurance subsidiary. Through the six months ended June 30, 2011, none of the permitted dividends
have been paid.
Acquisitions
On November 30, 2010, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of American Physicians
Service Group, Inc. (APS), whose primary operating entity is American Physicians Insurance Company
(API), in a transaction valued at $237 million including cash paid of $233 million and liabilities
assumed of $4 million. API provides professional liability insurance primarily to physicians in
Texas and reported gross written premium of $61 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, $5
million of which was included in ProAssurance consolidated premium for 2010.
See Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2010 Form 10-K for
detailed information regarding our acquisition of APS, including a summarized listing of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed.
38
Cash Flows
The principal components of our operating cash flows are the excess of premiums collected and
net investment income over losses paid and operating costs, including income taxes. Timing delays
exist between the collection of premiums and the payment of losses associated with the premiums.
Premiums are generally collected within the twelve-month period after the policy is written while
our claim payments are generally paid over a more extended period of time. Likewise, timing delays
exist between the payment of claims and the collection of any associated reinsurance recoveries.
Our operating activities provided positive cash flows of approximately $53.0 million and $75.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating cash flows for
2011 and 2010 compare as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
(In millions) |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Cash provided by operating activities six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
Increase (decrease) in operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in premium receipts (1) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Increase in payments to reinsurers (2) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Decrease in losses paid (3) |
|
|
24 |
|
Decrease in reinsurance recoveries (4) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Increase in Federal and state income tax payments (5) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Cash flows attributable to our APS subsidiary |
|
|
7 |
|
Other amounts not individually significant, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The decline in premium receipts primarily reflects the $10.0 million reduction in gross
written premiums at our subsidiaries other than APS. Written premiums associated with
two-year term policies increased by approximately $6.9 million for the six-month period ended
2011 as compared to 2010, while approximately half of the written amount is not scheduled to
be collected until 2012. Additionally, in 2011 more of our insureds have elected to take
advantage of payment plans offered to them. |
|
(2) |
|
Reinsurance contracts are generally for premiums written in a specific annual period, but
can remain in effect until all claims under the contract have been resolved. Some contracts
require annual settlements while others require settlement only after a number of years have
elapsed, thus the amounts paid can vary widely from period to period. |
|
(3) |
|
The timing of our loss payments varies from period to period because the process for
resolving claims is complex and occurs at an uneven pace depending upon the circumstances of
the individual claim. |
|
(4) |
|
The timing of reinsurance recoveries varies from period to period and can depend upon the
terms of the applicable reinsurance agreement, the nature of the underlying claim and the
timing and amount of underlying loss payments. |
|
(5) |
|
The increase in tax payments primarily reflects: |
|
|
|
A $9.4 million increase in estimated tax payments during 2011 as compared to 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Payments of $5.9 million made in 2011 for the 2008 and 2007 tax years as a result of
Federal tax return audits conducted by the Internal Revenue Service. For additional
information regarding the Internal Revenue Service audits, see Note 5 of the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
These increases in tax payments were offset by a $3.6 million increase in federal tax refunds
from capital loss carry-backs received in 2011 as compared to 2010. |
39
Investment Exposures
The following table provides summarized information regarding our investments as of June 30,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
% Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
294,744 |
|
|
$ |
9,960 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
7 |
% |
U.S. Agency |
|
|
72,877 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total government |
|
|
367,621 |
|
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and Municipal Bonds |
|
|
1,166,168 |
|
|
|
55,247 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
AA |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
345,807 |
|
|
|
11,162 |
|
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
A+ |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
FDIC insured |
|
|
61,754 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
2 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
55,111 |
|
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
1 |
% |
Utilities |
|
|
95,487 |
|
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Energy |
|
|
55,829 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Industrial |
|
|
649,336 |
|
|
|
32,165 |
|
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
24,920 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
70,161 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
AA |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate bonds |
|
|
1,358,405 |
|
|
|
57,932 |
|
|
|
(4,111 |
) |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
541,685 |
|
|
|
26,251 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
14 |
% |
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
18,728 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
BB+ |
|
|
<1 |
% |
Subprime (1) |
|
|
9,059 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
BBB |
|
|
<1 |
% |
Alt-A (2) |
|
|
6,226 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
90,039 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
2 |
% |
Credit card |
|
|
21,909 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
1 |
% |
Automobile |
|
|
41,034 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
AAA |
|
|
1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
14,210 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
AA+ |
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
742,890 |
|
|
|
32,336 |
|
|
|
(2,256 |
) |
|
AA+ |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
3,635,084 |
|
|
|
160,002 |
|
|
|
(7,619 |
) |
|
AA- |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
5,414 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Energy |
|
|
7,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Technology |
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Industrial |
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Index funds |
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
All Other |
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equities |
|
|
36,432 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term |
|
|
128,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business-owned life insurance (BOLI) |
|
|
51,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA- |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in tax credit partnerships |
|
|
89,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Other business interest |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Private fundprimarily invested in long/short equities |
|
|
18,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Private fundprimarily invested in non-public equities |
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
116,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB capital stock |
|
|
4,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Private fundprimarily invested in distressed debt |
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Private fundprimarily invested in long/short equities |
|
|
11,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
Private Equity Fund |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments |
|
|
35,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
$ |
4,004,702 |
|
|
$ |
160,020 |
|
|
$ |
(7,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$0.9 million are AA, $6.1 million are BBB, $2.1 million are B or below |
|
(2) |
|
$1.3 million are AA, $0.2 million are A, $0.3 million are BBB, $4.4 million are CCC or below |
40
A detailed listing of our investment holdings as of June 30, 2011 is presented in an
Investor Supplement we make available in the Investor Relations section of our website,
www.proassurance.com or directly at www.proassurance.com/investorrelations/supplemental.aspx.
We manage our investments to ensure that we will have sufficient liquidity to meet our
obligations, taking into consideration the timing of cash flows from our investments, including
interest payments, dividends and principal payments, as well as the expected cash flows to be
generated by our operations. In addition to the interest and dividends we will receive we
anticipate that between $40 million and $100 million of our investments will mature (or be paid
down) each quarter of the next year and become available, if needed, to meet our cash flow
requirements. The primary outflow of cash at our insurance subsidiaries is related to paid losses
and operating costs, including income taxes. The payment of individual claims cannot be predicted
with certainty; therefore, we rely upon the history of paid claims in estimating the timing of
future claims payments. To the extent that we may have an unanticipated shortfall in cash we may
either liquidate securities or borrow funds under existing borrowing arrangements through the
Federal Home Loan Banking system and a $150 million credit facility, as discussed in Note 9 of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, given the relatively short
duration of our investments, we do not foresee any such shortfall.
Our investment portfolio continues to be primarily composed of high quality fixed income
securities with approximately 97% of our fixed maturities being investment grade securities as
determined by national rating agencies. The weighted average effective duration of our fixed
maturity securities at June 30, 2011 is 4.1 years; the weighted average effective duration of our
fixed maturity securities combined with our short-term securities is 3.9 years.
We have increased our investment in tax credit limited partnerships by an additional $32
million during the first six months of 2011. These investments are comprised of multiple separate
limited partner interests designed to generate investment returns by providing tax benefits to fund
investors in the form of project operating losses and tax credits. The related properties are
principally low income housing properties. The $90.0 million
carrying value of the partnerships
reflects the commitments to the partnerships (less amortization) of which approximately $61 million
has not yet been funded as of June 30, 2011.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to provide capacity to write larger limits of liability, to provide
protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to stabilize underwriting results in
years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance does not relieve us from the
ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement from the reinsurer for certain
losses paid by us.
Our risk retention level is dependent upon numerous factors including our risk tolerance and
the capital we have to support it, the price and availability of reinsurance, volume of business,
level of experience with a particular set of claims and our analysis of the potential underwriting
results within each state. We purchase reinsurance from a number of companies to mitigate
concentrations of credit risk. We utilize a reinsurance broker to assist us in the analysis of the
credit quality of our reinsurers. We base our reinsurance buying decisions on an evaluation of the
then-current financial strength, rating and stability of prospective reinsurers. However, the
financial strength of our reinsurers, and their corresponding ability to pay us, may change in the
future due to forces or events we cannot control or anticipate.
We have not experienced significant collection difficulties due to the financial condition of
any reinsurer; however, periodically, reinsurers may dispute our claim for reimbursement from them.
We have established appropriate reserves for any balances that we believe may not be ultimately
collected. Should future events lead us to believe that any reinsurer will not meet its obligations
to us, adjustments to the amounts recoverable would be reflected in the results of current
operations. Such an adjustment has the potential to be significant to the results of operations in
the period in which it is recorded; however, we would not expect such an adjustment to have a
material effect on our capital position or our liquidity.
41
Debt
Our long-term debt as of June 30, 2011 is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Contractual Rate |
|
|
Outstanding Principal |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities due 2034 |
|
|
4.1 |
%(1) |
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
|
$ |
22,992 |
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034 |
|
|
4.1 |
%(1) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Note Payable due February 2019 (2) |
|
|
6.6 |
%(3) |
|
|
17,275 |
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
Note Payable due February 2012 |
|
|
3.3 |
%(4) |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted quarterly based on LIBOR. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2019 Note Payable is valued at fair value. See Note 9. |
|
(3) |
|
A related interest rate swap fixes rate at 6.6%. Swap is settled monthly. See Note 9. |
|
(4) |
|
Adjusted quarterly based on the U.S. prime rate. |
All of our long-term debt is currently repayable or redeemable, with proper notice, at a
date no later than the next quarterly or semi-annual interest payment date. Insurance department
approval is required for redemption of surplus notes.
During the second quarter of 2011, we entered into a revolving credit agreement that expires
April 15, 2014. The agreement allows us to borrow up to $150 million that would be used for general
corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, short-term working capital, share repurchases as
authorized by the Board, and support for other activities we enter into in the normal course of
business. To date, we have not borrowed any funds under the agreement.
ProAssurance is currently in compliance with all covenants. Additional information regarding
our debt is provided in Note 9 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Treasury Shares
We
reacquired approximately 259,000 common shares having a total cost of
$15.4 million during
the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, all in the first
quarter, including approximately 7,000 forfeited employer match
shares (cost basis of $444,000) reacquired due to the termination of the ProAssurance Corporation Stock Ownership Plan. Additional
information regarding the termination of the ProAssurance Corporation Stock Ownership Plan is
provided in Note 10 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
At June 30, 2011 we have approximately $194.0 million in prior authorizations from our Board
of Directors available for use for the repurchase of common shares or the retirement of outstanding
debt.
Litigation
We are involved in various legal actions related to our insurance activities which we consider
in our evaluation of our reserve for losses. We also have other direct actions against the company
which we evaluate and account for as a part of our other liabilities.
In accordance with GAAP for insurance entities, claim-related actions are considered as a part
of our loss reserving process. We evaluate the likely outcomes from these actions giving
consideration to the facts and laws applicable to each case, appellate issues, coverage issues,
potential recoveries from our insurance and reinsurance programs, and settlement discussions as
well as our historical claims resolution practices. This data is then considered in the overall
evaluation of our reserve for losses.
There are risks, as outlined in our Risk Factors in Part 1 of our 2010 Form 10-K, that any of
these actions could cost us more than our estimates. In particular, we or our insureds may receive
adverse verdicts; post-trial motions may result in unfavorable rulings; any appeals that may be
undertaken may be unsuccessful; and we may be unsuccessful in our legal efforts to limit the scope
of coverage available to insureds.
For non-claim related actions, we evaluate each case separately and establish what we believe
is an appropriate reserve based on GAAP guidance related to contingent liabilities.
42
To the extent that the cost of resolving legal actions exceeds our estimates, the excess could
materially affect our results of operations in the period of resolution.
Overview of ResultsThree and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Net income is $55.1 million and $102.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to $40.4 million and $78.5 million for the same respective periods
in 2010. Net income per diluted share is $1.79 and $3.33 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, respectively, as compared to $1.23 and $2.40 for the same respective periods in 2010.
Results from the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 compare as follows:
Premiums
Net
premiums earned increased by $11.7 million or 9.3% and
$20.3 million or 8.2% for the 2011 three-and
six-month periods, respectively, including $14.5 million and $28.9 million, respectively,
attributable to the acquisition of APS. Our results reflect the effects of a competitive market
place and rate reductions that reflect improved loss trends.
Net Investment Income; Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
Our 2011 net investment result (which includes both net investment income and earnings from
unconsolidated subsidiaries) decreased by $4.0 million or 10.6% for the three-month period and
decreased by $9.8 million or 12.5% for the six-month period.
Net realized investment gains in 2011 are $2.2 million and $6.3 million for the three-and
six-month periods, respectively, as compared to net realized losses of $3.5 million and $5.9
million for the same respective periods in 2010.
Expenses
Current accident year net losses increased by $8.6 million or 8.1% for the 2011 three-month
period and increased by $15.3 million or 7.3% for the 2011 six-month period. Approximately $10.7
million and $20.5 million of the increase for the three-and six-month periods, respectively, is
attributable to the acquisition of APS. We reduced net losses by $50.2 million and $90.2 million
for the 2011 three-and six-month periods, respectively, and by $37.5 million and $62.5 million for
the same respective periods in 2010 as a result of our quarterly re-evaluation of net losses
incurred for prior accident years.
Underwriting, policy acquisition and operating expenses increased in 2011 as compared to 2010
by $1.2 million or 3.9% and $5.7 million or 9.1% for the three-and six-month periods, respectively, reflecting the
acquisition of APS, which added expenses of approximately $2.5 million and $6.4 million for the
three-and six-month periods, respectively.
Ratios
Our net loss ratio decreased in 2011 by 7.6 points for the three-month period, and decreased
9.1 points for the six-month period, primarily because favorable development was higher in 2011 as
compared to 2010. Approximately 1.0 point and 1.7 points of the decrease for the three-and
six-month periods, respectively, relates to a lower loss ratio for the business acquired in the APS
transaction.
Our 2011 underwriting expense ratio reflects a 0.5 point decrease for the three-month period
and a 0.3 point increase for the six-month period. The three-and the six-month periods
reflect reductions of 0.7 points and 0.3 points, respectively, attributable to the
effect of the business acquired from APS.
Our operating ratio declined in 2011 by 5.0 points for the three-month period, reflecting the
improved net loss ratio and expense ratio, offset by lower investment income. Our operating ratio
43
declined by 5.7 points for the six-month period, reflecting the improved net loss ratio,
offset by a higher expense ratio and lower investment income.
Return on equity is 11.4% and 10.8% for the three- and six-month periods of 2011,
respectively, on an annualized basis.
Book Value per Share
Our book value per share at June 30, 2011 is $64.28 compared to $60.35 at December 31, 2010.
The change reflects our 2011 income, the increase in accumulated other comprehensive income and a
benefit from share repurchases. Due to the size of our Shareholders Equity (approximately $2.0
billion at June 30, 2011), the growth rate of our book value per share may slow. The past growth
rates of our book value per share do not necessarily predict similar future results.
Non-GAAP Financial Measure Operating Income
Operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely used to evaluate the
performance of insurance entities. Operating income excludes the after-tax effects of realized
gains or losses and guaranty fund assessments. We believe operating income presents a useful view
of the performance of our insurance operations, but should be considered in conjunction with net
income computed in accordance with GAAP.
The following table is a reconciliation of Net income to Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,096 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
Items excluded in the calculation of operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
(6,324 |
) |
|
|
5,905 |
|
Guaranty fund assessments (recoupments) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
|
Pre-tax effect of exclusions |
|
|
(2,215 |
) |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
(6,382 |
) |
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect, at 35% |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
(1,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
53,656 |
|
|
$ |
42,256 |
|
|
$ |
98,642 |
|
|
$ |
81,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per diluted common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
Effect of exclusions |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income per diluted common share |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
3.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
44
Results of OperationsThree and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three and Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010
Selected consolidated financial data for each period is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
($ in thousands, except share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
$ |
98,522 |
|
|
$ |
16,780 |
|
|
$ |
276,115 |
|
|
$ |
255,699 |
|
|
$ |
20,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
107,011 |
|
|
$ |
88,868 |
|
|
$ |
18,143 |
|
|
$ |
256,894 |
|
|
$ |
234,089 |
|
|
$ |
22,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
142,409 |
|
|
$ |
135,933 |
|
|
$ |
6,476 |
|
|
$ |
283,783 |
|
|
$ |
270,204 |
|
|
$ |
13,579 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(5,346 |
) |
|
|
(10,535 |
) |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
|
(14,643 |
) |
|
|
(21,379 |
) |
|
|
6,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
137,063 |
|
|
|
125,398 |
|
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
269,140 |
|
|
|
248,825 |
|
|
|
20,315 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
36,297 |
|
|
|
37,081 |
|
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
72,457 |
|
|
|
74,709 |
|
|
|
(2,252 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
|
|
(3,780 |
) |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
(7,605 |
) |
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
(3,501 |
) |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
6,324 |
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
12,229 |
|
Other income |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
174,829 |
|
|
|
161,500 |
|
|
|
13,329 |
|
|
|
348,414 |
|
|
|
325,459 |
|
|
|
22,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
69,394 |
|
|
|
77,170 |
|
|
|
(7,776 |
) |
|
|
146,493 |
|
|
|
165,078 |
|
|
|
(18,585 |
) |
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(5,041 |
) |
|
|
(8,646 |
) |
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
(11,717 |
) |
|
|
(17,853 |
) |
|
|
6,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
64,353 |
|
|
|
68,524 |
|
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
|
|
134,776 |
|
|
|
147,225 |
|
|
|
(12,449 |
) |
Underwriting, policy acquisition and
operating expenses |
|
|
32,871 |
|
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
68,578 |
|
|
|
62,846 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
98,142 |
|
|
|
100,993 |
|
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
|
205,067 |
|
|
|
211,711 |
|
|
|
(6,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
76,687 |
|
|
|
60,507 |
|
|
|
16,180 |
|
|
|
143,347 |
|
|
|
113,748 |
|
|
|
29,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
21,591 |
|
|
|
20,126 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
40,557 |
|
|
|
35,255 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,096 |
|
|
$ |
40,381 |
|
|
$ |
14,715 |
|
|
$ |
102,790 |
|
|
$ |
78,493 |
|
|
$ |
24,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss ratio |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Underwriting expense ratio |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
71.0 |
% |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
|
83.8 |
% |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating ratio |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
|
|
53.8 |
% |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity* |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In all the tables that follow, the abbreviation nm indicates that the percentage change
is not meaningful.
As required by GAAP, our results include acquired entities only for the portion of the
reporting period that is after the acquisition date. Our 2011 operating results include three and
six months of APS activity for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, while our 2010
operating results do not include any APS activity. In many of the supporting tables that follow,
the effect of the additional 2011 APS activity is separately disclosed.
45
Premiums Written
Changes in our premium volume are driven by three primary factors: (1) the amount of new
business we are able to generate, including business that comes to PRA as a result of acquisitions,
(2) our retention of existing business, and (3) the premium charged for business that is renewed,
which is affected both by rates charged and by the amount and type of coverage an insured chooses
to purchase. The professional liability market remains competitive with some competitors choosing
to compete primarily on price.
Gross and net premiums written are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
79,689 |
|
|
$ |
71,206 |
|
|
$ |
8,483 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
$ |
191,949 |
|
|
$ |
198,219 |
|
|
$ |
(6,270 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
29,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,576 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,439 |
|
|
|
71,206 |
|
|
|
18,233 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
221,525 |
|
|
|
198,219 |
|
|
|
23,306 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
Non-physician: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare providers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
22,438 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,415 |
|
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
22,615 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital and facility (1) |
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
8,395 |
|
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
%) |
|
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
14,869 |
|
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (1) |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
9,685 |
|
|
|
8,503 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non continuing (1) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(99.1 |
%) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
(5,387 |
) |
|
|
(96.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-physician total |
|
|
22,152 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
|
|
46,084 |
|
|
|
48,013 |
|
|
|
(1,929 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tail premiums (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
%) |
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
(1,620 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
(16.1 |
%) |
|
|
8,506 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
%) |
Total Gross Premiums Written |
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
$ |
98,522 |
|
|
$ |
16,780 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
$ |
276,115 |
|
|
$ |
255,699 |
|
|
$ |
20,416 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Premiums Written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
97,129 |
|
|
|
88,868 |
|
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
227,024 |
|
|
|
234,089 |
|
|
|
(7,065 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
29,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,870 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,011 |
|
|
$ |
88,868 |
|
|
$ |
18,143 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
$ |
256,894 |
|
|
$ |
234,089 |
|
|
$ |
22,805 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
APS did not contribute any premiums written to these lines of business during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes all tail premiums. |
Gross Premiums Written
Physician Premiums PRA All Other
We wrote approximately $8 million and $11 million of new physician business during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to $2 million and $7 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Approximately $5.0 million of the new business in 2011 is
attributable to policies written for a group of physicians affiliated with Ascension Health
facilities in Michigan. Our arrangements with this group provide that
the initial policies will be heavily
reinsured by an affiliate of Ascension Health, and the increase to net written premiums
associated with these policies is $1.3 million.
Two-year term policies also contributed to the increase in gross written premium. Gross
written premium associated with two-year term policies is $7.1 million and $12.6 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to $1.6 million and $5.7
million for the same respective periods in 2010. We offer two-year term policies (as opposed to a
one-year term) to our
46
physician insureds in one selected jurisdiction. The premium associated with both policy terms is
included in written premium in the period the policy is written.
Retention rates for our physician business have improved as compared to 2010. Our retention
rate, which we calculate as retained premium divided by all premium subject to renewal, is 90% for
both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 89% for both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010. Retention rates are affected by a number of factors. We may lose
insureds to competitors or to self-insurance mechanisms (often when physicians join hospital-based
practice groups) due to pricing or other issues. We may choose not to renew an insured as a result
of our underwriting evaluation. Insureds may also terminate coverage because they have left the
practice of medicine for various reasons, principally for retirement but also due to disability or
other personal reasons.
Charged rates for our physician business renewed during the three months ended June 30, 2011
have averaged 2% lower than the expiring premium, while charged rates for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 showed no change. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, charged rates
decreased an average of 3% and 1%, respectively. In general, charged rates for our podiatric
physicians have increased as compared to 2010, while rates for our other physician insureds have
decreased. Our charged rates include the effects of filed rates, surcharges and discounts. Despite
competitive pressures, we continue to base our rates on expected losses, as indicated by our
historical loss data and available industry loss data. We are committed to a rate structure that
will allow us to fulfill our obligations to our insureds, while generating competitive returns for
our shareholders.
Physician Premiums APS Acquisition
Of the gross premiums written contributed by APS during the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, $0.2 million and $0.7 million is attributable to new physician business. The retention
rates on this book of business are 89% and 90% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively. Charged rates for APS physician premiums renewed during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 showed an average decrease of 2% and 3%, respectively, compared to the premiums
that expired.
Non-physician Premiums
Our healthcare providers included in non-physician premiums are primarily dentists,
chiropractors, optometrists, and allied health professionals. The 2011 increase is primarily
related to allied health coverages.
Hospital
and facility premiums decreased for the three- and six-month periods
of 2011. The
decline reflects the same competitive pressures in this area as we are seeing in our physician
business.
Non-physician other premiums are primarily legal professional liability premiums. The
increase in premium volume for the three- and six-month periods of 2011 principally relates to legal professional liability premiums.
Non-continuing in the above table separately identifies premium generated by certain types of
miscellaneous liability coverages which we no longer provide.
Tail Premiums
We offer extended reporting endorsement or tail policies to insureds that are discontinuing
their claims-made coverage with us. The amount of tail premium written and earned can vary widely
from period to period.
Net Premiums Written
The 2011 increase in net premiums written reflects the previously discussed changes to gross
premiums written and an additional increase of $5.6 million for
both the three-and six-month periods
related to a reinsurance commutation recorded during the second quarter (see separate discussion
below in Premiums Ceded). APS increased net written premiums by $9.9 million and $29.9 million for
the three- and six-month periods.
47
Premiums Earned/Premiums Ceded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
127,616 |
|
|
$ |
135,933 |
|
|
$ |
(8,317 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
%) |
|
$ |
254,352 |
|
|
$ |
270,204 |
|
|
$ |
(15,852 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
29,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,431 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,409 |
|
|
|
135,933 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
283,783 |
|
|
|
270,204 |
|
|
|
13,579 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Premiums ceded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
(5,528 |
) |
|
|
(52.5 |
%) |
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
21,379 |
|
|
|
(7,278 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
(5,189 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
%) |
|
|
14,643 |
|
|
|
21,379 |
|
|
|
(6,736 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
%) |
Net premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
122,609 |
|
|
|
125,398 |
|
|
|
(2,789 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
240,251 |
|
|
|
248,825 |
|
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
28,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,889 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
137,063 |
|
|
$ |
125,398 |
|
|
$ |
11,665 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
269,140 |
|
|
$ |
248,825 |
|
|
$ |
20,315 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums Earned
Because premiums are generally earned pro rata over the entire policy period, fluctuations in
premiums earned tend to lag those of premiums written. Generally, our policies carry a term of one
year, but as discussed above, we renew certain policies with a two-year term. Tail premiums are
generally 100% earned in the period written because the policies insure only incidents that
occurred in prior periods and are not cancellable.
Of the premiums earned contributed by APS during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
approximately $7.0 million and $17.3 million, respectively, are attributable to premiums written
prior to acquisition. Premiums written prior to our acquisition of APS that were unearned at June
30, 2011 are expected to affect premiums earned through the remainder of 2011 as follows: Quarter 3
- $2.7 million; Quarter 4 - $0.7 million.
Premiums Ceded
Premiums ceded represent the portion of earned premiums that we pay our reinsurers for their
assumption of a portion of our losses. The premium that we cede to our reinsurers is determined, in
part, by the loss experience (subject to minimums and maximums) of the business ceded to them. It
takes a number of years before all losses are known, and in the intervening period, premiums due to
the reinsurers are based on estimates.
During 2011, ProAssurance commuted (terminated) certain of its reinsurance arrangements with
Colisee Re (formerly AXA Reassurance S.A.) for approximately $4.3 million in cash. The effect of
the commutation was to reduce Premiums Ceded by approximately $5.6 million and to reduce
Reinsurance Recoveries by approximately $4.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
Reinsurance
expense ratio:* |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before commutation effect |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Commutation effect |
|
|
(4.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
Consolidated |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Calculated as premiums ceded as a percentage of premiums earned |
The decrease in our reinsurance expense ratio, exclusive of APS, is primarily due to the
commutation recorded during the second quarter of 2011.
The reinsurance expense ratio associated with the business acquired from APS is lower than the
ratio for our other business. In recent years, largely due to the advantageous legal climate within
the state of Texas, only a small percentage of APS paid losses have met reinsurance coverage
limits; consequently,
48
APS has been able to obtain reinsurance coverage for 2010 and 2011 at favorable rates. The APS
reinsurance arrangements base the amounts due to reinsurers, in part, on expected losses and the
change in the ratio between the 2011 first and second quarters reflects shifts in the actuarial
estimate of losses that will reach reinsurance coverage limits.
Net Investment Income, Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Net Realized
Investment Gains (Losses)
Net Investment Income
Net investment income is primarily derived from the income earned by our fixed maturity
securities and also includes income from our short-term and cash equivalent investments, dividend
income from equity securities, earnings from other investments and increases in the cash surrender
value of business owned life insurance contracts. Investment fees and expenses are deducted from
investment income.
Net investment income by investment category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
36,682 |
|
|
$ |
36,700 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
<(1 |
%) |
|
$ |
72,634 |
|
|
$ |
74,396 |
|
|
$ |
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
Equities |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
%) |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
%) |
Short-term investments |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(72.1 |
%) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(55.5 |
%) |
Other invested assets |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
(45.4 |
%) |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
%) |
Business owned life
insurance |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Investment expenses |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
(3,166 |
) |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
36,297 |
|
|
$ |
37,081 |
|
|
$ |
(784 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
%) |
|
$ |
72,457 |
|
|
$ |
74,709 |
|
|
$ |
(2,252 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities
The decrease in income for both the three- and six-month periods primarily reflects lower
yields partially offset by higher average investment balances. Further decreases in income were
mitigated by higher earnings from our Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) of $1.1
million and $1.2 million for the 2011 three- and six-month periods, respectively. A component of
TIPS yields is based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), lagged by approximately two
months, and the additional TIPS earnings are attributable to an increase in the CPI during the
first part of 2011. It is not generally projected that the CPI will continue to increase at the
same pace for the remainder of 2011, and we do not expect our TIPS earnings to continue at the
current escalated levels.
The overall yield on our portfolio declined for the three- and the six-month periods because
we were not able to reinvest proceeds from maturities, pay-downs and sales at rates comparable to
expiring rates while maintaining our asset quality and the duration of our portfolio. Additionally,
the yields on fixed maturity securities acquired in the APS transaction, after adjustment as
required by GAAP purchase accounting rules, approximated market yields on the acquisition date of
November 30, 2010 and lowered our average consolidated yield by approximately 10 basis points and
12 basis points for the three- and six-month periods, respectively. Average yields for our
available-for-sale fixed maturity securities during 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Month Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average income yield |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Average tax equivalent income yield |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
The level of our investment in fixed maturity securities varies depending upon a number
of factors, including, among others, our operating cash needs, anticipated shifts in credit
markets, the attractiveness of other investment alternatives, and cash needed for acquisitions or
other capital purposes. In 2011 as compared to 2010, our average investment in fixed maturities
increased by approximately 3% for both the three- and six-month periods, respectively.
49
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries is derived from our investment
interests accounted for under the equity method, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private investment funds, currently held |
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(165 |
) |
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
(859 |
) |
Private investment fund, liquidated in
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
Other business interest |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
(1,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,409 |
) |
Tax credit partnerships |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
(2,386 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
$ |
(2,416 |
) |
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
(3,255 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,780 |
) |
|
$ |
3,825 |
|
|
$ |
(7,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hold interests in certain private investment funds that derive earnings from trading
portfolios. The performance of the funds is affected by the volatility of equity and credit
markets. One fund, shown separately in the table, was liquidated in July 2010.
Our other business interest is in a development stage limited liability company that will, in
time, engage in active business operations. While we expect this investment to provide a positive
return over time, operating losses are expected to continue through 2011 and into 2012 due to the
start up nature of this entity. Our potential for loss is limited to the carrying amount of our
investment, currently $1.8 million.
We began investing in tax credit limited partnerships in 2010. Our tax credit investments are
designed to generate investment returns by providing tax benefits to fund investors in the form of
project operating losses and tax credits. Our tax credit partnerships reduced our tax expenses by
approximately $1.8 million and $3.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, while we recognized $1.3 million and $2.4 million of amortization during the same
respective periods on these investments noted in the table above.
Non-GAAP Financial Measure Tax Equivalent Investment Result
We believe that to fully understand our investment returns it is important to consider the
current tax benefits associated with certain investments; therefore, we impute a proforma
tax-equivalent investment result by adjusting the current tax benefit into the amount of investment
income a taxable investment would need to produce to fairly compare to an investment with
preferential tax treatment. We believe this better reflects the economies of our decision to invest
in certain asset classes that are either taxed at lower rates and/or result in reductions to our
current federal income tax expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment results, as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
36,297 |
|
|
$ |
37,081 |
|
|
$ |
72,457 |
|
|
$ |
74,709 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
(3,780 |
) |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,881 |
|
|
|
37,920 |
|
|
|
68,677 |
|
|
|
78,534 |
|
Taxable equivalent adjustments for (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
4,836 |
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
9,842 |
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
BOLI |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Dividends received deduction |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Tax credit partnerships |
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma tax-equivalent investment results |
|
$ |
41,970 |
|
|
$ |
44,085 |
|
|
$ |
84,259 |
|
|
$ |
91,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All adjustments were calculated using the 35% federal statutory tax rate.
|
50
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
The following table provides detailed information regarding our net realized investment gains
(losses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(769 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interest in a private investment fund |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
(3,373 |
) |
High yield asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,983 |
) |
Portion recognized in (reclassified from) Other
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
High yield asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(7,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,583 |
) |
|
|
(12,373 |
) |
Net gains (losses) from sales |
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
Trading portfolio gains (losses) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(3,305 |
) |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
(1,562 |
) |
Fair value adjustments, net |
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
(3,501 |
) |
|
$ |
6,324 |
|
|
$ |
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized impairments of $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
$3.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to an interest in a private
investment fund which we account for on a cost basis. The fund has notified us of its intention to
be sold publicly in the next few months, and we have reduced the carrying value of our interest in
the fund to reflect the expected market value of the assets.
Fair value adjustments are attributable to our election of fair value treatment for both the
2019 Note Payable and related interest rate swap, as discussed in Notes 3 and 9 of the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The determination of calendar year losses involves the actuarial evaluation of incurred losses
for the current accident year and the actuarial re-evaluation of incurred losses for prior accident
years, including an evaluation of the reserve amounts required for losses in excess of policy
limits.
Accident year refers to the accounting period in which the insured event becomes a liability
of the insurer. For claims-made policies, which represent over 90% of the Companys business, the
insured event generally becomes a liability when the event is first reported to the insurer; for
occurrence policies the insured event becomes a liability when the event takes place. We believe
that measuring losses on an accident year basis is the most indicative measure of the underlying
profitability of the premiums earned in that period since it associates policy premiums earned with
the estimate of the losses incurred related to those policy premiums.
51
The following tables summarize calendar year net losses and net loss ratios for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 by separating losses between the current accident year
and all prior accident years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Losses |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
103.9 |
|
|
$ |
106.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
204.5 |
|
|
$ |
209.7 |
|
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
114.6 |
|
|
$ |
106.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
|
$ |
209.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
(45.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(37.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(80.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.5 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
(50.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(37.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(90.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
58.9 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
(9.6 |
) |
|
$ |
124.5 |
|
|
$ |
147.2 |
|
|
$ |
(22.7 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
64.4 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
(4.1 |
) |
|
$ |
134.8 |
|
|
$ |
147.2 |
|
|
$ |
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Ratios* |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
85.1 |
% |
|
|
84.3 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
|
APS Acquisition |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
70.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
Consolidated |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
84.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
(36.7 |
%) |
|
|
(29.9 |
%) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
%) |
|
|
(25.1 |
%) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
(35.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
(35.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
Consolidated |
|
|
(36.6 |
%) |
|
|
(29.9 |
%) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
%) |
|
|
(25.1 |
%) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
51.8 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
nm |
Consolidated |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Net losses as specified divided by net premiums earned |
The increase in our current accident year net loss ratio, exclusive of APS, reflects an
increase in our estimates of loss adjustment expenses incurred, based on results of recent
actuarial evaluations. We expect lower losses related to the business acquired from APS. APS
operates primarily in Texas, which is currently experiencing a favorable legal climate due to tort
reform. The APS net loss ratio increased during the second quarter of 2011
as we applied a reserving approach similar to that utilized for our historical business.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized favorable loss development
of $50.2 million and $90.2 million, respectively, on a net basis, related to reserves previously
established for prior accident years. Principally this is due to favorable net loss development
within our retained layers of coverage ($1 million and below)
for accident years 2004 to 2009.
Approximately $10.2 million of the six months of favorable development relates to reserves
assumed in the acquisition of APS, principally for the 2010 accident year, and is based on first
and second quarter 2011 claims activity which indicated claims severity had declined below our
December 31, 2010 estimates.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized favorable loss development
of $37.5 million and $62.5 million, respectively, on a net basis, related to our previously
established (prior accident year) reserves, principally for the 2004 to 2008 accident years within
our retained layers of coverage ($1 million and below).
52
Substantially all of the development recognized during the first six months of 2011 and 2010
relates to medical professional liability claims-made reserves. The favorable development for
medical professional claims-made policies in both years is based upon observation of actual claims
data that indicates that claims severity (i.e., the expected average cost of claims) is trending
below our initial expectations. Given both the long tailed nature of our business and the past
volatility of final claim settlement values, we are generally cautious in giving credence to the
trends that lead to the recognition of favorable net loss development. As we conclude that
sufficient credible data with respect to these trends exists we take appropriate actions. In the
case of the claims severity trends, we believe it is appropriate to recognize the impact of these
trends in our actuarial evaluation of prior period loss estimates while also remaining attentive to
the past volatility of claims severity.
Assumptions used in establishing our reserve are regularly reviewed and updated by management
as new data becomes available. Any adjustments necessary are reflected in the current operations.
Due to the size of our reserve, even a small percentage adjustment to the assumptions can have a
material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the change is made, as was the
case in 2010 and has been thus far in 2011.
Underwriting, Policy Acquisition and Operating Expenses
The table below provides a comparison of 2011 and 2010 underwriting, policy acquisition and
operating expenses for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operation expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRA all other |
|
$ |
30,310 |
|
|
$ |
30,730 |
|
|
$ |
(420 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
$ |
60,656 |
|
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
$ |
(471 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
%) |
APS Acquisition |
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
6,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,419 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,829 |
|
|
|
30,730 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
67,075 |
|
|
|
61,127 |
|
|
|
5,948 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Agency expenses |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(95.4 |
%) |
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,871 |
|
|
$ |
31,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
68,578 |
|
|
$ |
62,846 |
|
|
$ |
5,732 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Operation Expenses
Exclusive of the effect of the APS acquisition, insurance operation expenses for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011, reflect lower policy acquisition and operating expenses of
approximately $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the three-
and the six-month periods of 2011 as
compared to the same periods in 2010, offset by a reduced amount of Guaranty Fund recoupments of
approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the same respective periods.
Expenses associated with APS included salary and benefit expenses of approximately $0.3
million and $0.9 million for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, that are related to
workforce reductions. APS policy acquisition expenses are approximately $0.5 million and $1.3
million lower for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, than would be considered normal
due to the application of GAAP purchase accounting rules whereby the capitalized policy acquisition
costs for policies written prior to the acquisition date were written off rather than being
expensed ratably over the term of the associated insurance policy.
53
Underwriting Expense Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Expense Ratio * |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting expense ratio,
consolidated |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Our expense ratio computations exclude agency expenses as discussed below. |
Our underwriting expense ratio, excluding the effect of APS, increased by 0.2 points for
the 2011 three-month period and by 0.6 points for the 2011 six-month period because expense
reductions did not keep pace with earned premium declines. The effect of APS was to reduce our
consolidated expense ratio by 0.7 points for the three-month period and 0.3 points for the
six-month period. The effect
of APS was less pronounced in the six-month period because APS
insurance operation expenses were higher in the first quarter than in the second quarter.
Agency expenses
We have historically operated several non-insurance subsidiaries, principally insurance agencies
that generated commission and service fee revenues. Expenses of our agency operations that are
associated with the generation of premium revenues by our insurance subsidiaries are included in
insurance operation expenses in the above table. Expenses of our agency operations that are directly
associated with external commission and service fee revenues are included in agency expenses in the
above table. In 2011 we discontinued most external agency operations. The declines in agency expenses
of $870,000 and $216,000 for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, reflect the discontinuation of
these operations. The decline is less pronounced for the six-month period because of costs incurred in the
first quarter of 2011 related to workforce reductions.
Interest Expense
The increase in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects
commitment fees and amortization of the initial loan costs related to the credit agreement entered
into during the second quarter of 2011. The credit agreement is discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest expense by debt obligation is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities due 2034 |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Note Payable due February 2019 |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Revolving credit agreement |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
Other |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
1,713 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
Taxes
Our effective tax rate for each period is lower than the 35% statutory rate because a
considerable portion of our net investment income is tax-exempt. Other factors affecting our
effective tax rate include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Tax-exempt income |
|
|
(4.4 |
%) |
|
|
(6.3 |
%) |
|
|
(4.7 |
%) |
|
|
(7.0 |
%) |
Tax credits |
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
BOLI redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three- and six-month periods is
attributable to a reduced benefit from tax-exempt income, new tax
credits, and, for the six-month period, the effects of BOLI
redemptions in 2010. In 2011, the overall amount of tax exempt income decreased and tax exempt
income represented a smaller percentage of total pretax income. Our tax credit investments
generated estimated tax credits of $1.8 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, but no tax credits were generated by those investments for the same
respective periods of 2010 (tax credits directly reduce our tax expense). We paid additional tax
during 2010 related to a partial redemption of our BOLI; there were no BOLI redemptions during
2011.
Current tax expense decreased $1.3 million and $5.1 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to the same respective
periods in 2010.
The decrease for the three-month period reflects tax credits
available in 2011 but not 2010 and additional tax paid on the BOLI redemption in 2010.
The decrease for the six-month period reflects tax credits available in 2011 but not in 2010, additional tax paid on the BOLI redemption in 2010, and tax provisions enacted for 2011 which allow the deduction of additional bonus depreciation.
Current tax expense for the six-month period was also reduced because we effectively settled
uncertain tax positions during 2011 due to the completion of our 2005 through 2008 IRS examination,
which is discussed in Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk related to our
investment operations. These risks are interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our fixed maturities portfolio is exposed to interest rate risk. Fluctuations in interest
rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these securities. As interest rates rise,
market values of fixed income portfolios fall and vice versa. Certain of the securities are held in
an unrealized loss position; we do not intend to sell and believe we will not be required to sell
any of the debt securities held in an unrealized loss position before its anticipated recovery.
The following table summarizes estimated changes in the fair value of our available-for-sale
fixed maturity securities for specific hypothetical changes in interest rates by asset class at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. There are principally two factors that determine interest
rates on a given security: market interest rates and credit spreads. As different asset classes can
be affected in different ways by movements in those two factors, we have broken out our portfolio
by asset class in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points |
|
|
|
(200) |
|
|
(100) |
|
|
Current |
|
|
100 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
All fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
3,867 |
|
|
$ |
3,773 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
3,488 |
|
|
$ |
3,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
All fixed maturity securities |
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
All fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
3,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
$ |
3,604 |
|
|
$ |
3,456 |
|
|
$ |
3,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations |
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
U.S. Agency obligations |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
All fixed maturity securities |
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
56
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including the maintenance of the existing level and composition of fixed
income security assets, and should not be relied on as indicative of future results.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation of
the fair value of fixed rate instruments. Actual values may differ from those projections presented
should market conditions vary from assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value of
individual securities, including non-parallel shifts in the term structure of interest rates and
changing individual issuer credit spreads.
ProAssurances cash and short-term investment portfolio at June 30, 2011 is on a cost basis
which approximates its fair value. This portfolio lacks significant interest rate sensitivity due
to its short duration.
Credit Risk
We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. We control
this exposure by emphasizing investment grade credit quality in the fixed income securities we
purchase.
As of June 30, 2011, 97% of our fixed maturity securities are rated investment grade as
determined by Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), such as A.M. Best,
Fitch, Moodys, and Standard & Poors. We believe that this concentration in investment grade
securities reduces our exposure to credit risk on our fixed income investments to an acceptable
level. However, investment grade securities, in spite of their rating, can rapidly deteriorate and
result in significant losses. Ratings published by the NRSROs are one of the tools used to evaluate
the credit worthiness of our securities. The ratings reflect the subjective opinion of the rating
agencies as to the credit worthiness of the securities, and therefore, we may be subject to
additional credit exposure should the rating prove to be unreliable.
We hold $1.2 billion of municipal bonds. We require the bonds that we purchase to meet our
credit criteria on a stand-alone basis. As of June 30, 2011, on a stand-alone basis, our municipal
bonds have a weighted average rating of AA.
We also have exposure to credit risk related to our receivables from reinsurers. Our
receivables from reinsurers (on both paid and unpaid losses) approximate $282 million at June 30,
2011 and $282 million at December 31, 2010.
Equity Price Risk
At June 30, 2011 our equity holdings had an approximate fair value of $36.4 million, almost
all of which is attributable to investments in common stocks. These securities are subject to
equity price risk, which is defined as the potential for loss in fair value due to a decline in
equity prices. The weighted average beta of this group of securities is 1.0. Beta measures the
price sensitivity of an equity security or group of equity securities to a change in the broader
equity market, in this case the S&P 500 Index. If the value of the S&P 500 Index increased by 10%,
the fair value of these securities would be expected to increase by 10% to $40.0 million.
Conversely, a 10% decrease in the S&P 500 Index would imply a decrease of 10% in the fair value of
these securities to $32.6 million. The selected hypothetical changes of plus or minus 10% do not
reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios and are used for illustrative
purposes only.
57
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company participated in
managements evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule
13a-15(e)) as of June 30, 2011. ProAssurances disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
On November 30, 2010 we completed the acquisition of American Physicians Service Group, Inc.
(APS). We have excluded APSs systems and processes from Managements Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2010 and will include APS in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2011.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls during the
quarter.
58
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
See Note 8 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
With
the exception of the risk factor listed below, there are no changes to the Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of the 2010 Form 10-K.
U.S. Government debt ratings may be downgraded.
If the US is downgraded below AAA, rating agencies
have indicated that the debt instruments of other issuers who are dependent upon federal support
and distributions, including states and local municipalities, may also be downgraded. If this
proves to be the case, the average credit rating of our investment portfolio will be reduced. Due
to the unpredictable nature of this situation, we are unable to provide a reliable estimate
regarding the extent to which our portfolio might be affected.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
(a) |
|
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of ProAssurance was held on May 18,
2011. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Item 4(b) is not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
At the meeting the shareholders of ProAssurance considered and acted upon the
following: |
|
(1) |
|
Elected directors to serve until the 2014 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
Lucian F. Bloodworth |
|
|
22,522,885 |
|
|
|
464,154 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Robert E. Flowers |
|
|
21,607,007 |
|
|
|
1,380,032 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Ann F. Putallaz |
|
|
22,734,991 |
|
|
|
252,048 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Drayton Nabers, Jr. |
|
|
22,725,543 |
|
|
|
261,496 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker Non- |
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
votes |
|
25,224,059 |
|
|
244,774 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Approved, on an advisory basis, the 2010 compensation of ProAssurances named
executive officers as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-
votes |
|
22,296,276 |
|
|
665,776 |
|
|
|
24,987 |
|
|
|
2,485,149 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Determined, on an advisory basis, how often shareholders will be asked to
approve the compensation of ProAssurances named executive officers as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
Two-Year |
|
Three-Year |
|
Abstain |
|
19,972,326 |
|
|
33,148 |
|
|
|
2,974,408 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Item 4(d) is not applicable. |
59
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
10.1 |
|
Revolving Credit Agreement between ProAssurance and U. S. Bank National Association, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, Branch Banking and Trust Company, First Tennessee
Bank, N.A., and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Pledge and Security Agreement between ProAssurance and U.S.
Bank National Association |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required
under SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
60
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
August 3, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward L. Rand, Jr. |
|
|
Edward L. Rand, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
61