e10vq
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-21433
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2797789
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
400 TECHNOLOGY SQUARE
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
02139
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (617) 613- 6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of
August 1, 2011, 22,694,000 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
83,185 |
|
|
$ |
86,927 |
|
Marketable investments (Note 4) |
|
|
135,114 |
|
|
|
119,990 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
47,714 |
|
|
|
73,574 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
12,598 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
17,804 |
|
|
|
16,733 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
300,849 |
|
|
|
317,790 |
|
Long-term marketable securities (Note 4) |
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
11,609 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
43,090 |
|
|
|
19,838 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
71,961 |
|
|
|
67,958 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
12,099 |
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
Non-marketable investments (Note 5) |
|
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
7,359 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
454,184 |
|
|
$ |
450,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,743 |
|
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
31,266 |
|
|
|
36,485 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
130,356 |
|
|
|
131,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
164,365 |
|
|
|
171,650 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
11,492 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
175,857 |
|
|
|
178,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Note 8): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 500 shares, issued and outstanding none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 125,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 30,746 and 30,500 as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 22,687 and 22,812 as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
366,354 |
|
|
|
358,017 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
90,033 |
|
|
|
81,652 |
|
Treasury stock - 8,059 and 7,688 as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, at cost |
|
|
(175,990 |
) |
|
|
(162,595 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,377 |
) |
|
|
(5,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
278,327 |
|
|
|
271,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
454,184 |
|
|
$ |
450,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research services |
|
$ |
47,341 |
|
|
$ |
40,752 |
|
|
$ |
91,888 |
|
|
$ |
80,168 |
|
Advisory services and other |
|
|
26,109 |
|
|
|
23,901 |
|
|
|
47,304 |
|
|
|
43,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
73,450 |
|
|
|
64,653 |
|
|
|
139,192 |
|
|
|
123,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and fulfillment |
|
|
28,024 |
|
|
|
24,300 |
|
|
|
53,522 |
|
|
|
46,627 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
26,009 |
|
|
|
20,720 |
|
|
|
51,474 |
|
|
|
40,808 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
7,720 |
|
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
14,924 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
63,834 |
|
|
|
54,524 |
|
|
|
125,378 |
|
|
|
105,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9,616 |
|
|
|
10,129 |
|
|
|
13,814 |
|
|
|
17,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
2,223 |
|
Gains on investments, net |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
9,678 |
|
|
|
11,304 |
|
|
|
14,349 |
|
|
|
20,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
|
4,402 |
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
|
|
7,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,470 |
|
|
$ |
6,902 |
|
|
$ |
8,381 |
|
|
$ |
12,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
22,517 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
22,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,203 |
|
|
|
23,135 |
|
|
|
23,227 |
|
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,381 |
|
|
$ |
12,674 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
Net gains from investments |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
(452 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
Amortization of premium on investments |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
Foreign currency (gains) losses |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
Other non-cash items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
27,160 |
|
|
|
26,220 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current
assets |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(4,367 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
1,382 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
|
|
(6,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
38,143 |
|
|
|
32,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(7,031 |
) |
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(26,100 |
) |
|
|
(2,442 |
) |
Purchases of marketable investments |
|
|
(48,361 |
) |
|
|
(61,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable investments |
|
|
31,624 |
|
|
|
78,547 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
11,175 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
Other investing activity |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(38,446 |
) |
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee equity
incentive plans |
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
|
8,292 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(13,395 |
) |
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(6,638 |
) |
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
(5,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,742 |
) |
|
|
46,107 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
86,927 |
|
|
|
97,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
83,185 |
|
|
$ |
143,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)
for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and
footnote disclosures required for complete financial statements are not included herein. The
year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
It is recommended that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes that appear in the Forrester Research, Inc. (Forrester)
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of the dates and
for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 may not be indicative of the results for the year ending December 31,
2011, or any other period.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
Effective January 1, 2011 the Company adopted Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13) for contracts
entered into or materially modified after that date. ASU 2009-13 updates the previous
multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance. The revised guidance primarily provides three
significant changes: 1) it eliminates the need for objective and reliable evidence of the fair
value of the undelivered element in order for a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of
accounting; 2) it eliminates the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration; and, 3)
it modifies the fair value requirements of EITF Issue 00-21 by providing best estimate of selling
price in addition to vendor specific objective evidence and vendor objective evidence for
determining the selling price of a deliverable. In addition, the guidance also expands the
disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Forrester generates revenues from licensing research (including our data products), performing
advisory services and consulting projects and hosting events. Forrester executes contracts that
govern the terms and conditions of each arrangement. Revenues are recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, services have been provided to
the customer, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue contracts may include either a
single product or service or a combination of multiple products and services. Revenues from
contracts that contain multiple products and services are allocated among the separate units of
accounting based on their relative selling prices; however, the amount recognized is limited to the
amount that is not contingent on future performance conditions. The Company obtains the selling
prices of its products and services based on an analysis of standalone sales of these products and
services during the year. Research service revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the
contract. Advisory service revenues are recognized when the customer receives the agreed upon
deliverable and consulting project revenues, which are short-term in nature and based upon
fixed-fee agreements, are recognized as the services are provided. Losses on consulting project
contracts, if any, would be recognized in the period in which the loss first becomes probable and
reasonably estimable. Reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as advisory services revenue.
Event revenues are recognized upon completion of the event.
Annual subscriptions to our RoleView research include access to all or a designated portion of our
research, and depending on the type of license, membership in one or more of our Forrester
leadership boards, unlimited phone or email analyst inquiry, unlimited participation in Forrester
Teleconferences, and the right to attend one event. Contracts for RoleView research entered into
prior to the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011, were accounted for as one unit of
accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over the membership period.
Contracts for RoleView research entered into or significantly modified after January 1, 2011 are
accounted for as two units of accounting: 1) the event ticket and 2) the remaining research
services that are delivered throughout the contract period, based on the new guidance that permits
alternative methods of determining selling price as it relates to the components that we do not
sell on a standalone basis, such as research services in this case. Arrangement consideration is
allocated to each of these elements based upon their relative selling prices, which is based on
standalone sales of event tickets and the estimated selling price of the remaining research
services. Annual subscriptions to our data products include access to designated survey data
products and access to a data specialist, which are delivered throughout the year, and are
accounted for as one unit of accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over
the membership period. Clients are offered a service guarantee, which gives them the right to
cancel their contracts prior to the end of the contract term and receive a refund for unused
products or services.
Note 3 Acquisition
On May 12, 2011, Forrester acquired Springboard Research
(Springboard), a provider of research and advisory
services focused on Asia Pacific and emerging markets. Springboard was a former division of
Knowledge Platform, Inc. The acquisition of the Springboard business further supports Forresters
role-based strategy and expands Forresters coverage in the Asia Pacific region. The total purchase
price was approximately $9.0 million, of which approximately $6.7 million was paid on the
acquisition date and $2.3 million (the Holdback) is
6
payable at various times through June 1,
2013, subject to possible reduction to satisfy indemnification claims and specified contingencies.
Of the $2.3 million Holdback, up to $0.9 million could be retained by the Company if certain
key employees do not remain with the Company through May 12,
2012 or if the Company is not able to occupy
one of Springboards facilities through September 15, 2012. The Company has recorded $1.4 million and $0.9 million of the Holdback
in accrued expenses and non-current liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The results of Springboard, which were not material to the consolidated financial statements, have
been included in Forresters consolidated financial statements since May 12, 2011 in the Technology
Industry Client Group segment. Pro forma financial information has not been provided as it is not
material to the consolidated results of operations.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for Springboard is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
85 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
579 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
297 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,674 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
138 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $2.1 million of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The Company believes
the goodwill reflects its expectations of synergistic revenue opportunities from the acquisition
and the value of the acquired workforce.
Intangible assets are amortized according to the expected cash flows to be received. The
following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective weighted average
lives (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful |
|
|
|
Assigned |
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
3,605 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Research content |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Marketable Investments
The following table summarizes the Companys marketable investments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal obligations |
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
11,909 |
|
Federal agency and corporate obligations |
|
|
122,848 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
123,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term available-for-sale securities |
|
|
134,743 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
135,114 |
|
ARS, long-term |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
145,743 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
(1,799 |
) |
|
$ |
144,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal obligations |
|
$ |
12,011 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
12,009 |
|
Federal agency and corporate obligations |
|
|
107,669 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
107,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term available-for-sale securities |
|
|
119,680 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
119,990 |
|
ARS, long-term |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
130,680 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
(2,079 |
) |
|
$ |
129,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains and losses on securities are included in earnings and are determined using the
specific identification method. Realized gains or losses on the sale of the Companys federal
agency, state, municipal and corporate obligations were not material in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.
The following table summarizes the maturity periods of the marketable securities in the Companys
portfolio as of June 30, 2011. In February 2008, certain auction rate securities (ARS) that
Forrester held experienced failed auctions that limited the liquidity of these securities. These
auction failures have continued and based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction
failures will continue. The following table reflects the ARS at their contractual maturity dates of
between 2024 and 2034 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2011 |
|
|
FY 2012 |
|
|
FY2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Federal agency and corporate
obligations |
|
$ |
36,723 |
|
|
$ |
53,559 |
|
|
$ |
31,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
|
$ |
123,205 |
|
State and municipal obligations |
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,909 |
|
ARS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,896 |
|
|
$ |
59,295 |
|
|
$ |
31,419 |
|
|
$ |
10,763 |
|
|
$ |
144,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and market value of Forresters
available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be
other-than-temporary, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Greater |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Federal agency and
corporate obligations |
|
|
32,667 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,786 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Greater |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Federal agency and
corporate obligations |
|
|
45,928 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,186 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
9,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
The Company measures certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis, including cash
equivalents, available-for-sale securities and trading securities. The fair values of these
financial assets have been classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy as
described in the accounting standards for fair value measurements.
Level 1 Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Fair value based on inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either
directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
8
Level 3 Fair value based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and such inputs are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The following table represents the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash
equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Money market funds (1) |
|
$ |
6,683 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,683 |
|
Federal agency and corporate obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,168 |
|
State and municipal obligations (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
23,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,683 |
|
|
$ |
150,177 |
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
$ |
166,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Money market funds (1) |
|
$ |
25,222 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,222 |
|
Federal agency and corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,981 |
|
State and municipal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,009 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
21,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,222 |
|
|
$ |
119,990 |
|
|
$ |
9,117 |
|
|
$ |
154,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents. |
|
(2) |
|
$13.0 million included in cash and cash equivalents as original maturities at the time of purchase were 90 days or less. |
|
(3) |
|
$2.1 million included in cash and cash equivalents as original maturities at the time of purchase were 90 days or less. |
Level 2 assets consist of the Companys entire portfolio of federal, state, municipal and corporate
bonds, excluding those municipal bonds described below with an auction reset feature. Level 2
assets have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of
each reporting period, typically utilizing third party pricing services or other market observable
data. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation methods, including both income and
market based approaches and observable market inputs to determine value. These observable market
inputs include reportable trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads, broker/dealer quotes, bids,
offers, current spot rates and other industry and economic events.
Level 3 assets at June 30, 2011 consist entirely of municipal bonds with an auction reset feature
(ARS) and at June 30, 2010 also included the UBS Right (as defined below). Prior to 2008, the fair
value of the ARS investments approximated par value due to the frequent resets through the auction
process. While the Company continues to earn interest on its ARS investments at the contractual
rate, these investments trade infrequently and therefore do not have a readily determinable market
value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximates par value. At June
30, 2011, the Company held ARS with one investment advisor. The Company values the ARS using a
discounted cash flow model that includes estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash
flows, credit and liquidity premiums and expected holding periods of the securities, which is
considered a Level 3 valuation. The valuation resulted in an unrealized loss recorded in other
comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of $1.7 million at June 30, 2011 and $1.9
million at December 31, 2010. The Company believes that the loss is temporary due to the strong
underlying credit rating of the securities and the fact that the Company does not intend to sell
the securities and is not likely to be required to sell the securities. The assumptions used in
valuing the ARS are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions
and market conditions change.
Through July 1, 2010, the Company also held ARS with UBS AG (UBS). Historically, UBS provided a
valuation utilizing Level 3 inputs for the ARS investments. UBS utilized a discounted cash flow
approach to arrive at its valuation, which was corroborated by a separate and comparable discounted
cash flow analysis prepared by the Company. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash
flow model included estimates, based on data available at each balance sheet date, of interest
rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, and expected holding periods
of the ARS. In November 2008, the Company accepted an offer (the Right) from UBS entitling the
Company to sell at par value ARS originally purchased from UBS at any time during a two-year period
from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. The Company valued the Right as an asset using a
discounted cash flow approach including estimates of interest rates and timing and amount of cash
flows, adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBSs financial ability to repurchase the ARS
beginning June 30, 2010, based on data available at each balance sheet date. The combined fair
value of the Right and the UBS ARS historically equaled the par value of the UBS ARS. The remaining
$5.4 million of par value UBS ARS at June 30, 2010 were sold to UBS at par under the Right on July
1, 2010.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Companys Level 3 financial
assets for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARS |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,117 |
|
Sales/Maturities |
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
142 |
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right |
|
|
ARS |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
39,525 |
|
Sales/Maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,250 |
) |
Total gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
15,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Non-Marketable Investments
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Companys non-marketable
investments, which were composed primarily of interests in technology-related private equity funds,
were $7.7 million and $7.4 million, respectively.
One of the Companys investments, with a book value of $1.6 million and $1.7 million at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, is being accounted for using the cost method and,
accordingly, is valued at cost unless an other-than-temporary impairment in its value occurs. The
other investments are being accounted for using the equity method as the investments are limited
partnerships and the Company has an ownership interest in excess of 5% and, accordingly, the
Company records its share of the investees operating results each period. The Company recorded a
gain from its non-marketable investments of $0.6 million and $0.5 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are included in gains on investments, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. Gains from non-marketable investments were insignificant during
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Note 6 Reorganization
The following table rolls forward the activity in the reorganization accrual for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
Total |
|
Accrual at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accrued costs related to the reorganization are expected to be paid during the third quarter of
2011.
Note 7 Net Income Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the basic weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is
computed by dividing net income by the diluted weighted average number of common shares and common
equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common equivalent
shares outstanding has been determined in accordance with the treasury-stock method. Common
equivalent shares consist of common stock issuable on the exercise of outstanding options and
vesting of restricted stock units when dilutive.
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
22,517 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
22,453 |
|
Weighted average common equivalent shares |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,203 |
|
|
|
23,135 |
|
|
|
23,227 |
|
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options excluded from diluted weighted average share calculation
as effect would have been anti-dilutive |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Note 8 Stockholders Equity
Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,470 |
|
|
$ |
6,902 |
|
|
$ |
8,381 |
|
|
$ |
12,674 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
(5,422 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable investments, net of tax |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,302 |
|
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
11,476 |
|
|
$ |
7,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Plans
Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is presented below (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2010 |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
$ |
26.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
37.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
25.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
32.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
$ |
26.52 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
$ |
14,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
24.84 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
$ |
11,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is presented below (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
192 |
|
|
$ |
27.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
36.54 |
|
Vested or settled |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
29.86 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
27.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
$ |
27.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
Forrester recognizes the fair value of stock-based compensation in net income over the requisite
service period of the individual grantee, which generally equals the vesting period. Stock-based
compensation was recorded in the following expense categories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of services and fulfillment |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,681 |
|
|
$ |
2,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009, the Company issued to its employees 95,496 performance-based RSUs. The vesting of the
RSUs is subject to performance criteria and will vest at 100% or 40% on April 1, 2012, or the RSUs
could be forfeited, depending on whether specified revenue growth and certain operating margin
targets related to full year 2011 performance are achieved. Compensation expense in 2009, 2010 and
the three months ended March 31, 2011 was recognized based on an estimate of 100% vesting of the
RSUs. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the
11
Company modified its assessment of the
likelihood of vesting to the 40% level and recorded a credit, to stock-based compensation expense, of approximately
$0.8 million during
the quarter resulting from the change in estimate.
Forrester utilizes the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of stock-based
compensation. Options granted under the equity incentive plans and shares subject to purchase under
the employee stock purchase plan were valued using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
Employee Stock |
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
Employee Stock |
|
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Purchase Plan |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Purchase Plan |
|
Average risk-free
interest rate |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
Expected life |
|
3.5 Years |
|
0.5 Years |
|
3.7 Years |
|
0.5 Years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Weighted average fair
value |
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
$ |
7.55 |
|
|
$ |
9.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
Employee Stock |
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
Employee Stock |
|
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Purchase Plan |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Purchase Plan |
|
Average risk-free
interest rate |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
Expected life |
|
3.5 Years |
|
0.5 Years |
|
3.7 Years |
|
0.5 Years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Weighted average fair
value |
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
$ |
7.55 |
|
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
Treasury Stock
Forresters Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate $260 million to purchase common stock
under the stock repurchase program. The shares repurchased may be used, among other things, in
connection with Forresters employee and director equity incentive and purchase plans. As of June
30, 2011, Forrester had repurchased approximately 8.1 million shares of common stock at an
aggregate cost of approximately $176.0 million.
Note 9 Income Taxes
Forrester provides for income taxes on an interim basis according to managements estimate of the
effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year. Certain items such as
changes in tax rates, foreign exchange gains or losses on the remeasurement of deferred tax
liabilities and tax benefits related to disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options are
treated as discrete items and are recorded in the period in which they arise.
Note 10 Operating Segments
Forrester is organized into three client groups with each client group responsible for writing
relevant research for the roles within the client organization on a worldwide basis. The three
client groups, which are considered operating segments, are: Information Technology (IT), Technology Industry (TI), and Marketing and
Strategy (M&S). All of the client groups generate revenues through sales of research and advisory
and other service offerings targeted at specific roles within their targeted clients. Each of the
client groups consists of research personnel focused primarily on issues relevant to particular
roles and to the day-to-day responsibilities of persons within the roles. Amounts included in the
Events segment relate to the operations of the events production department. Revenue reported in
the Events segment consists primarily of sponsorships and event tickets to Forrester events.
Forrester evaluates reportable segment performance and allocates resources based on direct margin.
Direct margin, as presented below, is defined as operating income excluding sales expenses, certain
marketing and fulfillment expenses, stock-based compensation expense, general and administrative
expenses, depreciation expense, and amortization of intangibles. The accounting policies used by
the reportable segments are the same as those used in the consolidated financial statements.
Forrester does not identify or allocate assets, including capital expenditures, by operating
segment. Accordingly, assets are not being reported by segment because the information is not
available by segment and is not reviewed in the evaluation of performance or in making decisions on
the allocation of resources.
The following tables present information about reportable segments (in thousands):
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
TI |
|
|
M&S |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,414 |
|
|
$ |
21,079 |
|
|
$ |
21,265 |
|
|
$ |
6,692 |
|
|
$ |
73,450 |
|
Direct margin |
|
|
16,066 |
|
|
|
14,550 |
|
|
|
13,020 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
47,241 |
|
Selling, marketing, administrative
and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,099 |
) |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
TI |
|
|
M&S |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
23,247 |
|
|
$ |
18,342 |
|
|
$ |
17,444 |
|
|
$ |
5,620 |
|
|
$ |
64,653 |
|
Direct margin |
|
|
16,166 |
|
|
|
14,388 |
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
43,260 |
|
Selling, marketing, administrative
and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,226 |
) |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
TI |
|
|
M&S |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Six months ended June 30,
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
48,447 |
|
|
$ |
40,719 |
|
|
$ |
41,329 |
|
|
$ |
8,697 |
|
|
$ |
139,192 |
|
Direct margin |
|
|
32,254 |
|
|
|
29,150 |
|
|
|
25,228 |
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
90,824 |
|
Selling, marketing, administrative
and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,791 |
) |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
TI |
|
|
M&S |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Six months ended June 30,
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
46,126 |
|
|
$ |
36,275 |
|
|
$ |
34,244 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
|
$ |
123,833 |
|
Direct margin |
|
|
32,079 |
|
|
|
28,303 |
|
|
|
20,775 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
83,127 |
|
Selling, marketing, administrative
and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,450 |
) |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects, believes,
anticipates, intends, plans, estimates, or similar expressions are intended to identify
these forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements
about the adequacy of our liquidity and capital resources, anticipated property and equipment
purchases, anticipated increases in our sales force, future depreciation expenses and anticipated continued
repurchases of our common stock. These statements are based on our current plans and
expectations and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future activities and
results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause actual future activities and results to differ
include, among others, our ability to retain and enrich memberships for our research products and
services, technology spending, our ability to respond to business and economic conditions and
market trends, the risks and challenges inherent in international business activities, competition
and industry consolidation, the ability to attract and retain professional staff, our dependence on
key personnel, and possible variations in our quarterly operating results. These risks are
described more completely in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events, or otherwise.
We derive revenues from memberships to our research products and services, performing advisory
services and consulting projects, and hosting events. We offer contracts for our research products
that are typically renewable annually and payable in advance. Research revenues are recognized as
revenue ratably over the term of the contract. Accordingly, a substantial portion of our billings
are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Clients purchase advisory services independently and/or
to supplement their memberships to our research. Billings attributable to advisory services and
consulting projects are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Advisory service revenues are
recognized when the customer receives the agreed upon deliverable. Consulting project revenues,
which generally are short-term in nature and based upon fixed-fee agreements, are recognized as the
services are provided. Event billings are also initially recorded as deferred revenue and are
recognized as revenue upon completion of each event.
Our primary operating expenses consist of cost of services and fulfillment, selling and marketing
expenses and general and administrative expenses. Cost of services and fulfillment represents the
costs associated with the production and delivery of our products and services, including salaries,
bonuses, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense for research personnel and all
associated editorial, travel, and support services. Selling and marketing expenses include
salaries, sales commissions, bonuses, employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, travel
expenses, promotional costs and other costs incurred in marketing and selling our products and
services. General and administrative expenses include the costs of the technology, operations,
finance, and human resources groups and our other administrative functions, including salaries,
bonuses, employee benefits, and stock-based compensation expense. Overhead costs such as facilities
are allocated to these categories according to the number of employees in each group.
Deferred revenue, agreement value, client retention, dollar retention and enrichment are metrics we
believe are important to understanding our business. We believe that the amount of deferred
revenue, along with the agreement value of contracts to purchase research and advisory services,
provide a significant measure of our business activity. We define these metrics as follows:
|
|
|
Deferred revenue - billings in advance of revenue recognition as of the measurement date. |
|
|
|
|
Agreement value - the total revenues recognizable from all research and advisory service
contracts in force at a given time (but not including advisory-only contracts), without
regard to how much revenue has already been recognized. |
|
|
|
|
Client retention - the percentage of client companies with memberships expiring during
the most recent twelve-month period that renewed one or more of those memberships during
that same period. |
|
|
|
|
Dollar retention - the percentage of the dollar value of all client membership contracts
renewed during the most recent twelve-month period to the total dollar value of all
client membership contracts that expired during the period. |
|
|
|
|
Enrichment - the percentage of the dollar value of client membership contracts renewed
during the most recent twelve-month period to the dollar value of the corresponding
expiring contracts. |
Client retention, dollar retention, and enrichment are not necessarily indicative of the rate of
future retention of our revenue base. A summary of our key metrics is as follows (dollars in
millions):
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
$ |
130.4 |
|
|
$ |
108.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Agreement value |
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
$ |
189.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Client retention |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Dollar retention |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Enrichment |
|
|
103 |
% |
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Number of clients |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
The increase in deferred revenue and agreement value from June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011 is
primarily due to increased demand for our products and services. Client and dollar retention rates
as well as our enrichment rate have all increased from the June 30, 2010 period which is consistent
with improved economic activity.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our policies and estimates, including but not limited
to, those related to our revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, non-marketable investments,
goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes and valuation and impairment of marketable
investments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, data available at the time
the estimates are made and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have updated our critical
accounting policies for revenue recognition and valuation and impairment of marketable
investments below. Our other critical accounting policies and estimates are described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Revenue Recognition.
Effective January 1, 2011 we adopted Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 updates the
previous multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance. The revised guidance primarily provides
three significant changes: 1) it eliminates the need for objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value for the undelivered element in order for a delivered item to be treated as a separate
unit of accounting; 2) it eliminates the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration;
and, 3) it modifies the fair value requirements of EITF Issue 00-21 by providing best estimate of
selling price in addition to vendor specific objective evidence and vendor objective evidence for
determining the selling price of a deliverable.
We generate revenues from licensing memberships to our research (including our data products),
performing advisory services and consulting projects and hosting events. We execute contracts that
govern the terms and conditions of each arrangement. Revenues are recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, services have been provided to
the customer, and collectability is reasonably assured. Our contracts may include either a single
product or service or a combination of multiple products and services. Revenues from contracts that
contain multiple products or services are allocated among the separate units of accounting based on
their relative selling prices; however, the amount recognized is limited to the amount that is not
contingent on future performance conditions. For example, when a discount off of list price is
provided in a multiple element contract, the discount is applied ratably to the research and data
products only (which commence delivery on the first day of the contract), as the undelivered
products in the contract (advisory services or events) would be refundable to the customer at list
price. We obtain the selling prices of our products and services based upon an analysis of
standalone sales of these products and services during the year. Research service revenues are
recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Advisory service revenues are recognized when the
customer receives the agreed upon deliverable and consulting project revenues are recognized as the
services are provided. Reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as advisory services revenue.
Event revenues are recognized upon completion of the event.
Annual subscriptions to our RoleView research include access to all or a designated portion of our
research, and depending on the type of license, membership in one or more of our Forrester
leadership boards, unlimited phone or email analyst inquiry, unlimited participation in Forrester
Teleconferences, and the right to attend one event. Contracts for RoleView research entered into
prior to the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011, were accounted for as one unit of
accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over the membership period.
Contracts for RoleView research entered into or significantly modified after January 1, 2011 are
accounted for as two units of accounting: 1) the event ticket and 2) the remaining research
services that are delivered throughout the contract period based on the new guidance that permits
alternative methods of determining selling prices as it relates to the components that we do not
sell on a standalone basis, such as research services in our case. Arrangement consideration is
allocated to each element based upon its relative selling price, which is determined based on
standalone sales of event tickets and the estimated selling price of the remaining research
services. Annual
15
subscriptions to our data products include access to designated survey data
products and access to a data specialist, which are delivered throughout the year, and are
accounted for as one unit of accounting and recognized ratably as research services revenue over
the membership period. We offer our clients a service guarantee, which gives our clients the right
to cancel their contracts prior to the end of the contract term and receive a refund for unused
products or services. Furthermore, our revenue recognition determines the timing of commission
expenses, as commissions are earned during the month a contract is booked and are deferred and
recognized as expense as the related revenue is
recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of deferred commissions at each balance sheet date.
Valuation and Impairment of Marketable Investments.
Our investment portfolio may at any time contain investments in U.S. Treasury and U.S. government
agency securities, taxable and/or tax exempt municipal notes (some of which may have an auction
reset feature), corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper and money market funds. The assessment
of the fair value of certain of the debt securities (e.g. those containing an auction reset
feature) can be difficult and subjective due in part to limited trading activity of certain of
these debt instruments.
In accordance with the accounting standard for fair value measurements, we have classified our
marketable investments as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair values determined
by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Fair values
determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets, quoted prices in markets that are not active
or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize
unobservable data points.
As of June 30, 2011, we held municipal bonds with a fair value of $9.3 million ($11.0 million at
par value) with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS). The fair value of
the ARS was determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow approach, which is considered a Level 3
valuation. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates,
based on data available at June 30, 2011, of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows,
credit and liquidity premiums, and expected holding periods of the ARS. The assumptions used in
valuing the ARS are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions
and market conditions change, which may lead us in the future to record additional losses for these
securities. We classified these ARS as available-for-sale securities and determined that the losses
were not considered other-than-temporary and were not due to credit losses. Accordingly, changes in
the market value of the ARS have been recorded in other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. If market
conditions deteriorate further, we may be required to record unrealized losses in other
comprehensive loss or impairment charges within the Consolidated Statements of Income. We may not
be able to liquidate these investments unless the issuer calls the security, a successful auction
occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, or the security matures.
At June 30, 2011, we held $150.2 million of marketable investments, excluding ARS, which were
valued using Level 2 inputs. Level 2 investments are initially valued at the transaction price and
subsequently valued, at the end of each reporting period, by our investment managers utilizing
third party pricing services, which consists of one price per instrument. We do not obtain pricing
or quotes from brokers directly and historically we have not adjusted prices obtained from our
investment managers for our non-ARS portfolio. We verify the pricing information obtained from our
investment managers by obtaining an understanding of the pricing methodology and inputs utilized by
the pricing services to value our particular investments, as well as an understanding of the
controls and procedures utilized by our investment managers to both ensure the accurate recording
and to validate the pricing of our investments obtained from the pricing services on an annual
basis. Our marketable investments consist solely of high credit quality corporate and municipal
bonds with a weighted average credit rating AA and do not include difficult to value features. The
majority of our marketable investments are in large corporate notes.
We conduct periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment that has an unrealized loss,
in accordance with the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain
investments, as required under current accounting standards. An unrealized loss exists when the
current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized
losses on available-for-sale securities that are determined to be temporary, and not related to
credit loss, are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, management performs an analysis
to assess whether we intend to sell or whether we would more likely than not be required to sell
the security before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. Where we intend to sell a
security, or may be required to do so, the securitys decline in fair value would be deemed to be
other-than-temporary and the full amount of the unrealized loss would be recorded within gains
(losses) on investments, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Regardless of our intent to
sell a security, we perform additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to
evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the security. Credit losses are identified
where we do not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of a
security and are recorded within gains (losses) on investments, net in the Consolidated Statements
of Income.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our statement of income as a percentage of total revenues for the
periods indicated:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research services |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Advisory services and other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and fulfillment |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
operations |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Gains on investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
73.5 |
|
|
$ |
64.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Revenues from research services |
|
$ |
47.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Revenues from advisory services and other |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Revenues attributable to customers outside of the U.S. |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Percentage of revenue attributable to customers outside
of the U.S. |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Number of clients (at end of period) |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Number of events |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total revenues is principally the result of increased demand for our products and
services from both the enrichment of our existing clients, as shown by our enrichment rate of 103%
for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2011, as well as from an increase in the number of
clients. We have also increased the number of selling and marketing personnel from 407 at June 30,
2010 to 491 at June 30, 2011. In addition, the effects of foreign exchange resulted in an
approximate 2% increase in total revenues during the quarter as compared with the second quarter of
2010. Revenue growth for the current quarter was driven by a 22% increase in revenue in the
marketing and strategy client group, a 15% increase in revenue in the technology industry client
group and a 5% increase revenue in the information technology client group. The acquisition of
Springboard had an insignificant effect on revenue growth during the quarter.
Cost of Services and Fulfillment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Cost of services and fulfillment (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Cost of services and fulfillment as a percentage of
total revenues |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of research and fulfillment employees (at end
of period) |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
The increase in cost of services and fulfillment in dollars during the three months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the prior period is
17
primarily the result of increased compensation and benefits
largely due to an increase in research and fulfillment employees, increased facility costs, and
increased travel and entertainment expense. These increases were partially offset by lower
stock-based compensation costs of approximately $0.6 million during the current quarter principally
due to a change in estimate for the amount of performance-based restricted stock units that are
expected to vest. We recognized $1.5 million of lease costs in the second quarter of 2011, of which
approximately $0.7 million was recorded as cost of services and fulfillment, related to our new
corporate headquarters as we have access to the facility for construction purposes prior to the
expected date that we will occupy the facility for operations in the third quarter of 2011.
Selling and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Selling and marketing expenses (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Selling and marketing employees (at end of period) |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
The increase in selling and marketing expenses in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to an increase in compensation and
benefits costs resulting from an increase in the number of selling and marketing employees and an
increase in sales commissions. The increase is also attributable to increased facility costs and
increased travel and entertainment expense. Subject to the business environment for our products
and services, we have an ongoing initiative to expand our sales force by 15% to 20% annually.
Increased sales of our research services resulting from the higher number of sales employees are
generally recognized over a twelve-month period, which typically results in an increase in selling
and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue during periods of sales force expansion. As noted
above under cost of services and fulfillment, we recognized $1.5 million of lease costs
in the second quarter of 2011 related
to our new corporate headquarters, of which $0.6 million was recorded as selling and marketing
expense.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
General and administrative expenses (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
General and administrative expenses as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
General and administrative employees (at end of period) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
The increase in general and administrative expense
in dollars during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is
primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits costs resulting from an increase in the
number of general and administrative employees to support our growth plan, an increase in
professional services primarily from approximately $0.3 million of costs for the acquisition of
Springboard, and an increase in facility costs. These increases were partially offset by lower
stock-based compensation costs of approximately $0.4 million during the current quarter due
primarily to a change in estimate for the amount of performance-based restricted stock units that
are expected to vest. As noted above under cost of services and fulfillment, we recognized $1.5
million of lease costs in the second quarter of 2011 related to our new corporate headquarters, of which $0.2 million was
recorded as general and administrative expense.
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Depreciation expense (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense as a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was consistent during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the
prior year. We expect depreciation expense to increase significantly in the second half of 2011 due
to the build-out and equipping of our new corporate headquarters, scheduled to be operative in the
third quarter of 2011, and to customer facing technologies that will be implemented in the second
half of 2011.
18
Amortization of Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Amortization expense (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
%) |
Amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in amortization expense during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due
to certain intangible assets from the acquisition of Strategic Oxygen in December 2009 becoming
fully amortized in the first quarter of 2011. The acquisition of Springboard on May 12, 2011
increased amortization expense by approximately $0.2 million during the current quarter.
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Other income
(expense), net
(dollars in
millions) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Other income
(expense), net as a
percentage of total
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
%) |
The decrease in other income (expense), net, during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is
primarily due to net foreign exchange losses of $0.4 million in the 2011 quarter compared to $0.5
million of foreign exchange gains in the prior year period. In addition, interest income decreased
during 2011 primarily due to lower returns on invested capital.
Gains on Investments, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gains on investments, net (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Gains on investments, net as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on investments during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 primarily represent our
share of equity method investment gains and were consistent in the current quarter in comparison to
the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Provision for
income taxes
(dollars in
millions) |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
The increase in the effective tax rate during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the
prior year is primarily due to the 2011 period including a tax expense from the remeasurement loss
of a euro-denominated deferred tax liability compared to a credit from a remeasurement gain in the
2010 period; however, this increase in tax expense during 2011 was offset by lower foreign taxes in
the 2011 period.
19
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
139.2 |
|
|
$ |
123.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Revenues from research services |
|
$ |
91.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Revenues from advisory services and other |
|
$ |
47.3 |
|
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Revenues attributable to customers outside of the U.S. |
|
$ |
41.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Percentage of revenue attributable to customers outside
of the U.S. |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Number of clients (at end of period) |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Number of events |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total revenues is principally the result of increased demand for our products and
services from both the enrichment of our existing clients, as shown by our enrichment rate of 103%
for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2011, as well as from an increase in the number of
clients. We have also increased the number of selling and marketing personnel from 407 at June 30,
2010 to 491 at June 30, 2011. In addition, the effects of foreign exchange resulted in an
approximate 1% increase in total revenues during the period. Revenue growth for the current quarter
was driven by a 21% increase in revenue in the marketing and strategy client group, a 12% increase
in revenue in the technology industry client group and a 5% increase in revenue in the information
technology client group.
Cost of Services and Fulfillment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Cost of services and fulfillment (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
$ |
46.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Cost of services and fulfillment as a percentage of
total revenues |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Number of research and fulfillment employees (at end
of period) |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
The increase in cost of services and fulfillment in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the prior period is primarily the result of
increased compensation and benefits principally due to an increase in research and fulfillment
employees, increased facility costs, and increased travel and entertainment expense due in part to
an all-employee meeting in the first quarter of 2011. These increases were partially offset by
lower stock-based compensation costs of approximately $0.4 million during the current period due to
primarily to a change in estimate for the amount of performance-based restricted stock units that
are expected to vest. We recognized $3.0 million of lease costs in the six months ended June 30,
2011, of which approximately $1.3 million was recorded as cost of services and fulfillment, related
to our new corporate headquarters as we have access to the facility for construction purposes prior
to the expected date that we will occupy the facility for operations in the third quarter of 2011.
Selling and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Selling and marketing expenses (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
51.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Selling and marketing employees (at end of period) |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
The increase in selling and marketing expenses in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to an increase in compensation and
benefits costs resulting from an increase in the number of selling and marketing employees and an
increase in sales commissions. The increase is also attributable to increased travel and
entertainment expense and increased facility costs. Subject to the business environment for our
products and services, we have an ongoing initiative to expand our sales force by 15% to 20%
annually. Increased sales of our research services resulting from the higher number of sales
employees are generally recognized over a twelve-month period, which typically results in an
increase in selling and marketing expense as a percent of revenue during periods of sales force
expansion. As noted above under cost of services and fulfillment, we recognized $3.0 million of
lease costs in the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to our new corporate headquarters, of which $1.2 million was recorded as
selling and marketing expense.
20
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
General and administrative expenses (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
General and administrative expenses as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative employees (at end of period) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
The increase in general and administrative expense
in dollars during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is
primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits costs resulting from an increase in the
number of general and administrative employees to support our growth plan, acquisition costs of
approximately $0.7 million in 2011 compared to a credit of $0.3 million in 2010, and an increase in
facility costs. As noted above under cost of services and fulfillment, we recognized $3.0 million
of lease costs in the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to our new corporate headquarters, of which $0.5 million was recorded as
general and administrative expense.
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Depreciation expense (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Depreciation expense as a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was consistent during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the prior
year. We expect depreciation expense to increase significantly in the second half of 2011 due to
the build-out and equipping of our new corporate headquarters, scheduled to be operative in the
third quarter of 2011, and to customer facing technologies that will be implemented in the second
half of 2011.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Amortization expense (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
%) |
Amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
%) |
The decrease in amortization expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to
certain intangible assets from the acquisition of Strategic Oxygen in December 2009 becoming fully
amortized in the first quarter of 2011. The acquisition of Springboard on May 12, 2011 increased
amortization expense by approximately $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Other income
(expense), net
(dollars in
millions) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
%) |
Other income
(expense), net as a
percentage of total
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
%) |
The decrease in other income (expense), net, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily
due to net foreign exchange losses of $1.0 million in the 2011 period compared to $0.8 million of
foreign exchange gains in the prior year period. In addition, interest income decreased during 2011
primarily due to lower returns on invested capital.
Gains on Investments, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gains on investments, net (dollars in millions) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Gains on investments, net as a percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on investments during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 primarily represent our
share of equity method investment gains and were consistent during the six months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the prior year.
21
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Provision for
income taxes
(dollars in
millions) |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
The increase in the effective tax rate during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the
prior year is primarily due to the 2011 period including a tax expense from the remeasurement loss
of a euro-denominated deferred tax liability compared to a credit from a remeasurement gain in the
2010 period; however, this increase in tax expense during 2011 was offset by lower state and
foreign taxes in the 2011 period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed our operations primarily through funds generated from operations.
Memberships for research services, which constituted approximately 66% of our revenues during the
six months ended June 30, 2011, are annually renewable and are generally payable in advance. We
generated cash from operating activities of $38.1 million and $32.4 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $5.7 million increase in cash provided from
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is attributable to an increase in cash from
working capital primarily from a decrease in income
tax payments due to the timing of the payments.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we used $38.4 million of cash from investing activities,
consisting primarily of $16.7 million in net purchases of marketable investments, $26.1 million of
purchases of property and equipment and $7.0 million for acquisitions. The property and equipment
purchases were partially funded by $11.2 million of restricted cash that had been placed in escrow
in 2010 for such purchases. Property and equipment purchases during the 2011 period consisted of leasehold
improvements for new facilities as well as purchases of software and computer equipment. During
2011, we anticipate spending $35 to $40 million for property and equipment purchases, a majority
of which will be utilized for the build-out and equipping of our new headquarters in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. We had $15.5 million in escrow at December 31, 2010, classified as restricted cash
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which will be utilized to fund a portion of the leasehold
improvements during 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated $15.5 million of
cash from investing activities, consisting primarily of $17.5 million in proceeds from net
maturities of marketable investments which were partially offset by $2.4 million of property and
equipment purchases. In addition, restricted cash decreased by approximately $1.9 million primarily
due to a release from an escrow account as the contingent purchase price element of the Strategic
Oxygen acquisition was settled and paid during the first quarter of 2010. We regularly invest
excess funds in short and intermediate-term interest-bearing obligations of investment grade.
We used $6.6 million of cash from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011
resulting from $13.4 million of purchases of our common stock, partially offset by $6.4 million of
proceeds from exercises of stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. We generated $3.6
million of cash from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $8.3
million of proceeds from exercises of stock options and our employee stock purchase plan, partially
offset by $5.0 million of purchases of our common stock. At June 30, 2011, we had $84 million
remaining on our stock repurchase authorization and we plan to continue to repurchase our common
stock during the remainder of 2011, as market conditions warrant.
As of June 30, 2011, we held approximately $9.3 million ($11.0 million par value) of state and
municipal bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS). In February 2008,
auctions began to fail for these securities and have continued to fail. As a result, our ability to
liquidate our investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term
may be limited or not exist. Based on our expected operating cash flows and our cash resources, we
do not anticipate the current lack of liquidity on our ARS investments will affect our
ability to execute our current business plan.
As of June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $83.2 million and marketable investments
and long-term investments of $144.4 million. We do not have a line of credit and do not presently
anticipate the need to access a line of credit in the foreseeable future. We believe that our
current cash balance, marketable investments, and cash flows from operations will satisfy working
capital, financing activities, and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next two
years.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to the contractual obligations table as disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
22
There have been no material changes in our assessment of our sensitivity to market risk since our
presentation set forth in Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Securities Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our management, with
the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based upon their
evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance as of that date.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K remain applicable to our
business. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we
face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Through June 30, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized an aggregate $260 million to purchase
common stock under our stock repurchase program, including $60 million authorized in 2010 and $50
million authorized in 2009. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we purchased the following
shares of our common stock under the stock repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Under the Stock |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Repurchase Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
April 1 April 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88,839 |
|
May 1 May 31 |
|
|
46,991 |
|
|
$ |
37.21 |
|
|
$ |
87,089 |
|
June 1 June 30 |
|
|
86,297 |
|
|
$ |
35.67 |
|
|
$ |
84,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All purchases of our common stock were made under the stock repurchase program first announced
in 2002. |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
In accordance with the Board of Directors recommendation
and the preference of a majority of our stockholders, the Board of Directors has determined that we will hold an annual
vote on the compensation of our named executive officers.
23
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer. (filed
herewith) |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer. (filed
herewith) |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed
herewith) |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed
herewith) |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive date files shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael A. Doyle
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Doyle |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal financial officer) |
|
|
Date: August 4, 2011
25
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Document |
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Executive Officer. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed
herewith) |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. (filed
herewith) |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive date files shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing. |
26