e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-31311
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1701361 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 700 |
|
|
San Jose, California
|
|
95110 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(408) 280-7900
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of November 2, 2007 was
28,038,157.
Item 1. Financial Statements.
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except par values)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,461 |
|
|
$ |
36,451 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
16,402 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $254 in 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
32,609 |
|
|
|
27,575 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
88,039 |
|
|
|
85,805 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
3,761 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
64,593 |
|
|
|
60,034 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
13,605 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
4,994 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
176,985 |
|
|
$ |
168,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
3,325 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
4,221 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
Billings in excess of recognized revenue |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
18,239 |
|
|
|
19,219 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
Long-term taxes payable |
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
24,618 |
|
|
|
20,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.00015 par value, 5,000 shares authorized: no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.00015 par value, 70,000 shares authorized: shares issued and outstanding
28,022 in 2007 and 27,948 in 2006 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
177,992 |
|
|
|
167,323 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 988 shares in 2007 and 551 shares in 2006 |
|
|
(10,001 |
) |
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(18,423 |
) |
|
|
(13,890 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
152,367 |
|
|
|
148,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
176,985 |
|
|
$ |
168,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-silicon- yield solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
$ |
16,294 |
|
|
$ |
11,153 |
|
|
$ |
46,090 |
|
|
$ |
33,859 |
|
Software licenses |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
8,217 |
|
Gain share |
|
|
6,807 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
17,590 |
|
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
19,364 |
|
|
|
69,908 |
|
|
|
57,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of design-to-silicon yield solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of design-to-silicon-yield solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
|
8,052 |
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
22,842 |
|
|
|
19,808 |
|
Software licenses |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Amortization of acquired technology |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of designto silicon-yield solutions |
|
|
9,431 |
|
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
27,492 |
|
|
|
23,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
11,306 |
|
|
|
42,416 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
9,008 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
26,175 |
|
|
|
19,543 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
18,278 |
|
|
|
14,850 |
|
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
15,782 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
|
|
47,482 |
|
|
|
35,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(5,066 |
) |
|
|
(1,571 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
(3,719 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(939 |
) |
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
(3,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,223 |
|
|
|
26,860 |
|
|
|
28,127 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
28,223 |
|
|
|
27,621 |
|
|
|
28,127 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
5,462 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(3,706 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
|
|
(5,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(986 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
1,045 |
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
(2,179 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Billings in excess of recognized revenue |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,645 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(20,840 |
) |
|
|
(42,198 |
) |
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
26,221 |
|
|
|
25,242 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
|
|
(1,915 |
) |
Payments on businesses acquired, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(4,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
(18,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
(4,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term obligations |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Principal payments on notes to stockholders |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(2,973 |
) |
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
(7,725 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
36,451 |
|
|
|
60,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
38,461 |
|
|
$ |
52,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price adjustments |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of deferred stock compensation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment on account |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued
for business acquired |
|
$ |
2,874 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been
prepared by PDF Solutions, Inc. (the Company), without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The interim unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary, (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) to present a fair statement of results
for the interim periods presented. The operating results for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or the full fiscal year.
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses. A significant portion of the Companys revenues require estimates with respect to
total costs which may be incurred and revenues earned. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and
transactions.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives revenue from two sources: Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions and gain
share. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) No. 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts and SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended.
Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions revenue is derived from
integrated solutions and software licenses. Revenue recognition for each element of
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions is summarized as follows:
Integrated Solutions The Company generates a significant portion of its revenue from
fixed-price contracts delivered over a specific period of time. These contracts require the
accurate estimation of the cost to perform obligations and the overall scope of each engagement.
Revenue under contracts for solution implementation services is recognized as the services are
performed using the cost-to-cost percentage of completion method of contract accounting. Losses
on solution implementation contracts are recognized when determined. Revisions in profit
estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become
known and can be estimated.
On occasion, the Company has licensed its software products as a component of its fixed
price integrated solutions implementations. In such instances, the software products are licensed
to the customer over the specified term of the agreement with support and maintenance to be
provided over the license term. Under these arrangements, where vendor-specific objective
evidence of fair value (VSOE) does not exist to allocate a portion of the total fee to the
undelivered elements, revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Costs
incurred under these arrangements are deferred and recognized in proportion to revenue recognized
under these arrangements.
Revenue from support and maintenance services is recognized ratably over the term of the
support and maintenance contract, generally one year, while revenue from consulting, installation
and training services is recognized as the services are performed. When bundled with software
licenses in multiple element arrangements, support and maintenance, consulting (other than for
our fixed price solution implementations), installation, and training revenue is allocated to
each element of a transaction based upon its fair value as determined by the Companys VSOE. VSOE
is generally established for support and maintenance based upon negotiated renewal rates while
VSOE for consulting, installation, and training is established based upon the Companys customary
pricing for such services when sold separately. When VSOE does not exist to allocate a portion of
the total fee to the undelivered elements, the entire revenue, including license revenue, is
recognized ratably over the term of the underlying element for which VSOE does not exist.
6
Software Licenses The Company also licenses its software products separately from its
integrated solution implementations. In such cases revenue is recognized under the residual
method when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii)
the fee is fixed or determinable, (iv) collectibility is probable and the arrangement does not
require services that are essential to the functionality of the software. When arrangements
include multiple elements such as support and maintenance, consulting (other than for our fixed
price solution implementations), installation, and training, revenue is allocated to each element
of a transaction based upon its fair value as determined by the Companys VSOE and such services
are recorded as integrated solutions. VSOE is generally established for support and maintenance
based upon negotiated renewal rates while VSOE for consulting, installation and training services
is established based upon the Companys customary pricing for such services when sold separately.
In multiple element arrangements for which VSOE does not exist, the entire revenue is recognized
ratably over the term of the underlying element for which VSOE does not exist, and is recorded as
integrated solutions revenue.
Gain Share Gain share revenue represents profit sharing and performance incentives earned
based upon the Companys customer reaching certain defined operational levels. Upon achieving such
operational levels, the Company receives either a fixed fee and/or variable fee based on the units
manufactured by the customer. Due to the uncertainties surrounding attainment of such operational
levels, the Company recognizes gain share revenue (to the extent of completion of the related
solution implementation contract) upon receipt of performance reports or other related information
from the customer supporting the determination of amounts and probability of collection.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share-Based Payment. Under
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based
on the awards fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model
and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires
various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, and expected option life. If any of the
assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ
materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.
2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
In May 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Fabbrix, Inc., a development stage
company and provider of silicon intellectual property designed to create highly manufacturable and
area-efficient designs targeted for advanced technology nodes. With this acquisition, the Company
has enhanced its strength in silicon characterization to enable a true co-optimization of the
manufacturing fabric and the logic elements. Total cost for the acquisition was $6.2 million, which
includes $2.7 million cash, 271,531 shares of the Companys common stock valued at $2.9 million,
and $668,000 in acquisition costs. In connection with the acquisition, approximately $405,000 in
cash and 41,000 shares of common stock is held in escrow as security against certain financial
contingencies. The cash and shares held in escrow, less amounts deducted to satisfy contingencies
will be released no later than on the 18 month anniversary of the acquisition. The remaining
amounts in cash and shares have been paid to the selling stockholders as of September 30, 2007. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $2.2 million of goodwill and $7.8 million of
identifiable intangible assets with a weighted average life of 5.4 years. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2007
include the results of Fabbrix, Inc. since the date of acquisition.
In addition to the initial cash and stock consideration, up to $14.0 million in earnout
consideration will be paid to the selling stockholders if qualifying orders, received during the
first twelve months following the closing date, are recognized as revenue during the forty-eight
months following the closing date. Earnout consideration will consist of a combination of fifty
percent of such amount as a cash payment and fifty percent of such amount as shares of PDF
Solutions common stock. As the contingent consideration is based on future earnings, and is not
determinable nor estimable at the date of acquisition, the additional consideration would be
recorded only when it becomes determinable. Since the acquisition, the estimable qualifying
revenue has not met the $2.0 million threshold, no additional consideration has been recorded as of
September 30, 2007.
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price for this acquisition, as of the date of the
acquisition, is summarized below (in thousands, except amortization period). The allocation was
based on managements estimates of fair value, which included a third-party appraisal. The
allocation of the purchase price may be subject to change based on final estimates of fair value,
primarily related to actual transaction costs. As of September 30, 2007, the Company booked an
adjustment to increase goodwill of $62,000 related to transaction costs.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price |
|
(Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair value of tangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
Fair value of intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,430 |
|
Patent and applications |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,453 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
Notes to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has repaid the notes to stockholders as of September 30, 2007.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data represents the combined results
of operations as if Fabbrix had been combined with the Company at the beginning of the respective
periods. This pro forma financial data includes the straight line amortization of intangibles over
their respective estimated useful lives (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
69,908 |
|
|
$ |
57,231 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(5,145 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
Pro forma net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Pro forma net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
The results do not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition
been made as of the beginning of the respective periods or the results of operations which may
occur in future periods.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company made final net payments of $4.6 million that were previously accrued as part of the purchases of Si Automation S.A. and Fabbrix, Inc.
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157
(SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurement that establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. Additionally, the pronouncement provides guidance on the
definition, measurement, methodology and use of assumptions and inputs in determining fair value.
The pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASBs Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) No. 06-2, Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits
Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43 (EITF No. 06-2). Prior to the issuance of
EITF No. 06-2 the Company accounted for sabbatical expense under SFAS No. 43, by expensing the
cost of compensated absences for sabbatical programs as incurred. EITF No. 06-2 requires
companies to accrue the cost of such compensated absences over the requisite service period.
The Task Force allows the use of one of two specified methodologies for adopting the change
in accounting principle: i) a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the
beginning of the year of adoption; or ii) retrospective application to all prior periods.
The Company elected to use the cumulative-effect adjustment to the beginning balance of
retained earnings resulting in an additional liability of $1.4 million, an additional deferred
tax asset of $587,000, and an increase in the accumulated deficit of $845,000. Under this
transition method, prior periods were not restated and accrued expenses as of September 30,
2007 include accrued sabbatical expense for all employees who are eligible for sabbatical leave.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS
No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain
other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities choosing the
fair value option would be required to recognize subsequent changes in the fair value of those
instruments and other items directly in earnings. This standard also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No.159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on its financial statements.
8
4. INVESTMENTS
The following tables summarize the Companys investments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
14,013 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,014 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,650 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,232 |
|
Included in short-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 all securities held by the Company had a
maturity of one year or less. Commercial paper and money market funds with original maturities when
acquired less than or equal to 90 days were included in cash and cash equivalents. Securities with
original maturities when acquired over 90 days and all auction rate securities were included in
short-term investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
13,307 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,308 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
5,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,050 |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,983 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
23,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,085 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
44,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,683 |
|
Included in short-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable include amounts that are unbilled at the end of the period. Unbilled
accounts receivable are determined on an individual contract basis and were approximately $12.1
million and $7.8 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
6. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the
weighted average common shares outstanding plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which
are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases where the
effect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators
used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(939 |
) |
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
(3,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
28,223 |
|
|
|
26,860 |
|
|
|
28,127 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
Dilutive items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average stock options outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted computation |
|
|
28,223 |
|
|
|
27,621 |
|
|
|
28,127 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the
diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the
periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Common stock options |
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
6,735 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(939 |
) |
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
(3,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on short term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
(1,531 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires goodwill to be tested for
impairment on an annual basis (or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist) and requires
purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless
these lives are determined to be indefinite. The Company last completed its annual impairment test
on December 31, 2006 and concluded that goodwill was not impaired.
The following table provides information relating to the intangible assets and goodwill as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Amount |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
60,034 |
|
|
$ |
2,155 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
64,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired identifiable
intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired technology |
|
|
4 - 5 |
|
|
$ |
7,901 |
|
|
$ |
6,430 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,516 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,815 |
|
Brand name |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
Customer relationships
and backlog |
|
|
1 - 6 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
Patent and applications |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Other acquired intangibles |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,605 |
|
|
$ |
7,830 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,594 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
13,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Amount |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
39,886 |
|
|
$ |
21,071 |
|
|
$ |
(923 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired identifiable
intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired technology |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
8,221 |
|
|
$ |
4,950 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,270 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,901 |
|
Brand name |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
822 |
|
Customer relationships
and backlog |
|
|
1 - 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
Other acquired intangibles |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,787 |
|
|
$ |
10,575 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,766 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
13,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded adjustments to goodwill
of $21,000 related to the assumption of certain liabilities in connection with the acquisition of
Si Automation S.A. and transaction costs in connection with the
acquisition of Fabbrix, Inc., and of $2.4 million related to the effect of changes in exchange
rates associated with recorded goodwill.
10
In 2006, the Company recorded a non-cash adjustment of $923,000 relating to the reduction of a
valuation allowance established for deferred tax assets that were assumed in connection with the
Companys acquisition of IDS Software Inc. in 2003. Such adjustment resulted in a decrease in
goodwill.
The Company expects the annual amortization of acquired intangible assets to be as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2007 (three-month period) |
|
$ |
1,041 |
|
2008 |
|
|
3,296 |
|
2009 |
|
|
3,296 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,029 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,861 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. INCOME TAXES
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48). FIN 48 provides a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax
returns. Unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been
established. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $308,000
decrease in net liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. This was accounted for as an adjustment
to the beginning balance of the accumulated deficit on the balance sheet. As the Company does not
anticipate recognizing these tax benefits over the next twelve months, it has reclassified these
liabilities as long-term. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recorded its tax exposure as
short-term liabilities.
As of the date of adoption and as of September 30, 2007, the Companys unrecognized tax
benefits totaled approximately $4.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The entire amount of
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate in any
future period.
The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files numerous consolidated and
separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and foreign jurisdictions. The
Company is not currently under audit by any tax authority. Because the Company used some of the tax
attributes carried forward from previous years to tax years that are still open, statutes of
limitation remain open for all tax years to the extent of the attributes carried forward into tax
year 2003 for federal tax purposes and tax year 2002 for California tax purposes. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations in its major foreign
subsidiaries jurisdictions for years before 2003.
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in income tax
expense in the consolidated statements of operations. At the date of adoption and as of September
30, 2007, $309,000 and $485,000, respectively, of accrued interest was included in long-term taxes
payable on the consolidated balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase over the next twelve months.
However, at this time the Company is unable to estimate the range of such possible change in
unrecognized tax benefits.
As of May 1, 2007, the Company has decided to no longer reinvest indefinitely its
undistributed earnings in its French subsidiary.
10. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No.123R. Stock-based
compensation expenses before taxes related to the Companys
employee stock purchase plan and stock-option plans were
allocated as follows (in thousands):
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cost of design-to-silicon yield solutions |
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
1,519 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,453 |
|
|
$ |
5,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company estimated the fair value of share-based payments using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions and weighted average fair
values:
Stock Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
56.9 |
% |
|
|
59.9 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
4.82 |
% |
Expected dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period |
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
6.53 |
|
|
$ |
7.63 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
|
60.3 |
% |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.02 |
% |
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
Expected dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of employee stock |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
As of September 30, 2007, the Company has in effect the following stock-based compensation
plans:
Stock Plans During 2001, the Company terminated the 1996 and 1997 Stock Plans as to future
option grants, and adopted the 2001 Stock Plan. Under the 2001 Stock Plan, on January 1 of each
year, starting with year 2002, the number of shares in the reserve will increase by the lesser of
(i) 3,000,000 shares, (ii) 5% of the outstanding common stock on the last day of the immediately
preceding year, or (iii) the number of shares determined by the board of directors. Under the 2001
Stock Plan, the Company may grant options to purchase shares of common stock to employees,
directors and consultants at prices not less than the fair market value at the date of grant for
incentive stock options and not less than 85% of fair market value for nonstatutory stock options.
These options generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable
ratably over a four-year period. Certain option grants under the 1996 and 1997 Stock Plans provide
for the immediate exercise by the optionee with the resulting shares issued subject to a right of
repurchase by the Company which lapses based on the original vesting provisions.
Stock option activity under the Company plans as of September 30, 2007 and changes during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
6,664,094 |
|
|
$ |
12.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
595,103 |
|
|
|
10.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(161,836 |
) |
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(340,690 |
) |
|
|
13.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
6,756,671 |
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
$ |
3,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest |
|
|
6,385,309 |
|
|
|
11.93 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
3,769,689 |
|
|
|
10.94 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
$ |
3,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value
based on the Companys closing stock price of $9.88 as of September 30, 2007, which would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
was $604,000.
As of September 30, 2007, there was $14.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.73 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 was $4.4 million.
Nonvested shares (restricted stock units) as of September 30, 2007 and changes during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
Shares |
|
Date Fair Value |
Nonvested, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
|
9.88 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, there was $1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 6.7 years. The total compensation expense related to shares expected to vest during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
was $116,000.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan In July 2001, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (Purchase Plan), under which eligible employees can contribute up to 10% of their
compensation, as defined in the Purchase Plan, towards the purchase of shares of PDF common stock
at a price of 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period or
the end of each six-month offering period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the
purchase plan compensation expense was $483,000.
Stock Repurchase Program In February 2003, the Board of Directors approved a program to
repurchase up to $10.0 million of the Companys common stock in the open market. As of September
30, 2007, the Company has repurchased 987,808 shares at a weighted average price of $10.12 per
share for a total cost of $10.0 million. Under this authorization, the Company may not make
additional stock repurchases. On October 29, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new program
to repurchase up to an additional $10.0 million of the Companys common stock on the open market.
The right of repurchase stock under this program will expire on
October 29, 2010.
The stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands, except number of shares and per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Shares Repurchased |
|
|
Price per Share |
|
|
Amount Repurchased |
|
Cumulative balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
550,521 |
|
|
$ |
10.08 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
437,287 |
|
|
$ |
10.18 |
|
|
|
4,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative balance, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
987,808 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
$ |
10,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is
evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance.
13
The Companys chief operating decision maker, the Chief Executive Officer, reviews discrete
financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions
and assessing financial performance. Accordingly the Company considers itself to be in one
operating segment, specifically the licensing and implementation of yield improvement solutions for
integrated circuit manufacturers.
The Company had revenues from individual customers in excess of 10% of total revenues as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
Customer |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
A |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
B |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
C |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
D |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
E |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
The Company had gross accounts receivable from the following individual customers in excess of
10% of gross accounts receivable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
A |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
B |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
C |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
F |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Revenues from customers by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Asia |
|
$ |
13,792 |
|
|
$ |
10,396 |
|
|
$ |
37,820 |
|
|
$ |
28,626 |
|
United States |
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
|
7,096 |
|
|
|
22,377 |
|
|
|
23,585 |
|
Europe |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
9,711 |
|
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,068 |
|
|
$ |
19,364 |
|
|
$ |
69,908 |
|
|
$ |
57,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 long-lived assets related to PDF SAS (formerly
SIA), located in France, totaled $473,000 and $583,000, respectively. As of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, long-lived assets related to PDF Solutions GmbH (formerly
AISS), located in Germany, totaled $121,000 and $216,000, respectively. The majority of the
Companys remaining long-lived assets are in the United States.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Immediately prior to the merger with Fabbrix, Inc. (the Merger), Mr. Lucio L. Lanza, a
director and Chairman of the Board of the Company, served as President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of Fabbrix. Mr. Lanza also held shares of capital stock of Fabbrix, both
individually and through his venture capital firm, Lanza techVentures. In connection with the
Merger, Mr. Lanza received $353,000 in cash and 35,722 shares of the Companys common stock in
exchange for his Fabbrix shares, and will be eligible to receive up to an additional $2.1 million
worth of earnout consideration. Lanza techVentures received $1.2 million in cash and 121,720 shares
of the Companys common stock at the closing of the Fabbrix acquisition (the Closing) in exchange
for its Fabbrix shares, and will be eligible to receive up to an additional $5.4 million worth of
earnout consideration. In addition, out of the merger consideration, Lanza techVentures received
$519,000 in cash as repayment of certain bridge loans previously made to Fabbrix. To consider a
transaction with Fabbrix, the Companys Board established a special committee consisting
exclusively of independent directors (the Special Committee). The Special Committee reviewed,
evaluated and directed the negotiation of the transaction and the Merger Agreement and recommended
to the Companys Board that the Company enter into the Merger Agreement. Mr. Lanza did not
participate on behalf of the Company in any actions with respect to the transaction and the Merger
Agreement, and did not participate in any deliberations or other activities of the Special
Committee.
14
In
view of the Nasdaq independent director rules and other applicable
requirements, the Companys Board
has determined that Mr. Lanza is no longer independent under those rules and therefore, Mr. Lanza
has resigned from the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of the Companys Board effective at the Closing. Mr. Lanza
continues to serve as Chairman of the Companys Board. The Company has replaced Mr. Lanza with
other independent Board Members to fill the vacancies on the Companys Audit, Compensation, and
Nominating and Corporate Governance. The Companys Board has also appointed a Lead Independent
Director.
Andrzej Strojwas, the Companys Chief Technologist was a stockholder of Fabbrix immediately
prior to the Merger. In connection with the Merger, Mr. Strojwas received $53,000 in cash and 5,402
shares of the Companys common stock, and will be eligible to receive up to an additional
$311,000 worth of earnout consideration.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or our
future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as may, will, should, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate,
predict, potential or continue, the negative effect of terms like these or other comparable
terminology. These statements are only predictions. These statements involve known and unknown
risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events or results to differ
materially. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information
available to us on the date of filing, and we assume no obligation to update any such
forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider
various factors, including the risk factors set forth in Item 1A and set forth at the end of Item
1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We caution investors
that our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties.
Overview
Our technologies and services enable semiconductor companies to improve the yield and
performance of integrated circuits, or ICs, by improving the manufacturability of a design,
integrating the design and manufacturing processes and better controlling equipment during mass
production. Our solutions are designed to improve a semiconductor companys time-to-market and
yield and, thus, product profitability. Our solutions combine proprietary manufacturing process
simulation software, yield and performance modeling software, design-for-manufacturability IP and
software, test chips, a proprietary electrical wafer test system, yield and performance enhancement
methodologies, yield management systems, process control system software, and professional
services. We analyze yield loss mechanisms to identify, quantify and correct the issues that cause
yield loss, as an integral part of the IC design process. This drives IC design and manufacturing
improvements that enable our customers to have higher initial yields and achieve and exceed
targeted IC yield and performance throughout product life cycles. Our solution is designed to
increase the initial yield when a design first enters a manufacturing line, to increase the rate at
which that yield improves, and to allow subsequent product designs to be added to manufacturing
lines more quickly and easily.
The result of implementing our solutions is the creation of value that can be measured based
on improvements to our customers actual yield. We align our financial interests with the yield and
performance improvements realized by our customers, and receive revenue based on this value. To
date, we have sold our technologies and services to semiconductor companies including leading
integrated device manufacturers, fabless semiconductor companies and foundries.
From our incorporation in 1992 through late 1995, we were primarily focused on research and
development of our proprietary manufacturing process simulation and yield and performance modeling
software. From late 1995 through late 1998, we continued to refine and sell our software, while
expanding our offering to include yield and performance improvement consulting services. In late
1998, we began to sell our software and consulting services, together with our newly developed
proprietary technologies, as Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions, reflecting our current business
model. In April 2000, we expanded our research and development team and gained additional
technology by acquiring AISS, now operating as PDF Solutions, GmbH, which continues to develop
software and
15
provide development services to the semiconductor industry. In July 2001, we completed the
initial public offering of our common stock. In 2003, we enhanced our product and service offerings
through the acquisitions of IDS Software Inc. and WaferYield. In 2006, we complemented our
technology offering by acquiring Si Automation S.A. and adding its FDC software capabilities to our
integrated solution offering. In 2007, we added intellectual property building blocks for logic
design technology to our solution portfolio by acquiring Fabbrix, Inc.
Industry Trend
Demand for consumer electronics and communications devices continues to drive technological
innovation as the need for products which have greater performance, lower power consumption,
reduced costs and smaller size continues to grow with each new product generation. To meet this
demand, IC manufacturers and designers are constantly challenged to improve the overall performance
of ICs by designing and manufacturing ICs with more embedded applications to create greater
functionality. As a result, in 2004 and through 2007 more and more companies have expanded or
advanced their design and manufacturing processes to develop and produce deep submicron ICs
containing component sizes measured at 90 nanometers and below. As this trend continues, companies
will continually be challenged to improve process capabilities to optimally produce ICs with
minimal random and systematic and yield loss, which is driven by the lack of compatibility between
the design and its respective manufacturing process. We believe as volume production of deep
submicron ICs continues to grow, the difficulties of integrating IC designs with their respective
processes will create a greater need for products and services that address the performance yield
loss issues the semiconductor industry is facing today and will face in the future.
Financial Highlights
Financial highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
Total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $24.1 million, an
increase of 24% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue from
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased to
$17.3 million compared to $15.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The
change was primarily a result of increases in revenue related to integrated solutions of
$5.1 million and partially offset by a decrease in revenue related to software licenses of
$2.8 million over the three months ended September 30, 2006. Gain share revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 increased to $6.8 million from $4.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. Our gain share revenue may continue to fluctuate from
quarter to quarter as a result of each customers contractual performance measures for
achieving gain share as well as each customers production volumes in any given period. |
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $939,000, compared to net
income of $570,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in net income
was primarily attributable to increases in operating expenses and amortization of acquired
intangible assets, both as a result of the acquisitions of Si Automation S.A. in October
2006 and Fabbrix, Inc. in May 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Net loss per basic and diluted share was $0.03 for the three months ended September 30,
2007 compared to net income per basic and diluted share of $0.02 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. |
Financial highlights for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
Total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $69.9 million, an increase
of 22% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue from
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased to
$52.3 million compared to $42.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
change was primarily a result of increase in revenues related to integrated solutions of
$12.2 million and partially offset by decrease in revenue related to software licenses of
$2.0 million over the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Gain share revenue was $17.6
million, an increase of 16% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $4.0 million, compared to net
loss of $9,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The net loss was primarily
attributable to increases in operating expenses and amortization of acquired intangible
assets, both primarily the result of the acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006
and Fabbrix, Inc. in May 2007. |
16
|
|
|
Net loss per basic and diluted share was $0.14 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 compared to net loss per basic and diluted share of $0.00 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $2.9 million from $52.9
million as of December 31, 2006 to $50.0 million as of September 30, 2007. Net cash provided by
operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $5.6 million. Net
cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included $1.9
million as final payments for our acquisition of Si Automation S.A., $2.7 million payment
for our acquisition of Fabbrix, Inc., and $1.7 million to purchase property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled
$3.0 million and was primarily related to $4.5 million in stock repurchases and $683,000 in
debt payments, partially offset by the exercise of stock options and purchases under the
employee stock purchase plan of $2.1 million. The fluctuations in foreign exchange rates
favorably impacted our cash flow by $195,000. |
Critical Accounting Policies
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical
accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Note 1 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements, accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements. The following is a brief discussion of the more significant
accounting policies and methods that we use. For a more detailed discussion of our accounting
policies and methods, please refer to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
General
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on
our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our preparation of these
condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. We based our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The most
significant estimates and assumptions relate to revenue recognition, software development costs,
recoverability of goodwill and acquired intangible assets, estimated useful lives of acquired
intangibles and the realization of deferred tax assets. Actual amounts may differ from such
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition
We derive revenue from two sources: Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions and gain share. We
recognize revenue in accordance with the provisions of American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants SOP No. 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production-Type Contracts and SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended.
Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions revenue is derived from
integrated solutions and software licenses. Revenue recognition for each element of
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions is as follows:
Integrated Solutions We generate a significant portion of our revenue from fixed-price
contracts delivered over a specific period of time. These contracts require the accurate
estimation of the cost to perform obligations and the overall scope of each engagement. Revenue
under contracts for solution implementation services is recognized as the services are performed
using the cost-to-cost percentage of completion method of contract accounting. Losses on solution
implementation contracts are recognized when determined. Revisions in profit estimates are
reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become known and can
be estimated. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be
performed, or do not manage the projects properly within the planned period of time or satisfy
our obligations under contracts, resulting contract margins could be materially different than
those anticipated when the contract was executed. Any such reductions in contract margin could
have a material negative impact on our operating results.
On occasion, we have licensed our software products as a component of our fixed price
solution implementations. In such instances, the software products are licensed to the customer
over the specified term of the agreement with support and maintenance to be provided over the
license term. Under these arrangements, where vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value
(VSOE) does not exist to allocate a portion of the total fee to the undelivered elements,
revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Costs incurred under these arrangements are deferred and
recognized in proportion to revenue recognized under these arrangements.
17
Revenue from support and maintenance services is recognized ratably over the term of the
support and maintenance contract, generally one year, while revenue from consulting, installation
and training services is recognized as the services are performed. When bundled with software
licenses in multiple element arrangements, support and maintenance, consulting (other than for
our fixed price solution implementations), installation, and training revenue is allocated to
each element of a transaction based upon its fair value as determined by our VSOE. VSOE is
generally established for support and maintenance based upon negotiated renewal rates while VSOE
for consulting, installation, and training is established based upon our customary pricing for
such services when sold separately. When VSOE does not exist to allocate a portion of the total
fee to the undelivered elements, the entire revenue, including license revenue, is recognized
ratably over the term of the underlying element for which VSOE does not exist.
Software Licenses We also license our software products separately from our integrated
solution implementations. In such cases revenue is recognized under the residual method when (i)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed
or determinable, (iv) collectibility is probable and the arrangement does not require services
that are essential to the functionality of the software. When arrangements include multiple
elements such as support and maintenance, consulting (other than for our fixed price solution
implementations), installation, and training, revenue is allocated to each element of a
transaction based upon its fair value as determined by our VSOE and such services are recorded as
integrated solutions. VSOE is generally established for support and maintenance based upon
negotiated renewal rates while VSOE for consulting, installation and training services is
established based upon our customary pricing for such services when sold separately. In multiple
element arrangements for which VSOE does not exist, the entire revenue is recognized ratably over
the term of the underlying element for which VSOE does not exist, and is recorded as integrated
solutions revenue.
Gain Share Gain share revenue represents profit sharing and performance incentives earned
based upon our customers reaching certain defined operational levels. Upon achieving such
operational levels, we receive either a fixed fee and/or variable fee based on the units
manufactured by the customer. Due to the uncertainties surrounding attainment of such operational
levels, we recognize gain share revenue (to the extent of completion of the related solution
implementation contract) upon receipt of performance reports or other related information from our
customers supporting the determination of amounts and probability of collection. Gain share revenue
is dependent on many factors which are outside our control, including among others, continued
production of the related ICs by our customers, sustained yield improvements by our customers and
our ability to enter into new Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions contracts containing gain share
provisions.
Software Development Costs
Costs for the development of new software products and substantial enhancements to existing
software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at
which time any additional costs would be capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed. Because we believe our current process for
developing software is essentially completed concurrently with the establishment of technological
feasibility, no costs have been capitalized to date.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
As of September 30, 2007, we had $64.6 million of goodwill and $13.9 million of intangible
assets. In valuing our goodwill and intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated
future cash flows to be derived from the acquired assets. If actual results are different from
these estimates, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets, which would have
a material adverse effect on our operating results. We evaluate goodwill for impairment pursuant to
the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have selected December 31
as the date upon which to perform our annual testing for impairment. As of December 31, 2006, we
completed our last annual testing requirements and determined that the carrying value of goodwill
had not been impaired.
We are currently amortizing our acquired intangible assets over estimated useful lives of 1 to
7 years, which are based on the estimated period of benefit to be delivered from such assets.
However, a decrease in the estimated useful lives of such assets would cause additional
amortization expense or an impairment of such assets in future periods.
18
Realization of Deferred Tax Assets
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable
income and utilize tax planning strategies. We have recorded a deferred tax asset in the amount
that is more likely than not to be realized based on current estimations and assumptions. We
evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. Any resulting changes to the
valuation allowance will result in an adjustment to income in the period the determination is made.
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had not recorded a valuation allowance
against its deferred tax assets.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Under the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on
the awards fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model and
is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires various
highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, and expected option life. If any of the
assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ
materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for periods indicated, the percentage of total revenue
represented by the line items reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-silicon-yield solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
Software licenses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Gain share |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of design-to-silicon-yield solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of design-to-silicon-yield
solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Software licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired technology |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of design-to silicon-yield solutions |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Amortization of other acquired intangible
assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
( |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Revenue |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-silicon-yield solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
$ |
16,294 |
|
|
$ |
11,153 |
|
|
$ |
5,141 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Software licenses |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
(2,844 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Gain share |
|
|
6,807 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,068 |
|
|
$ |
19,364 |
|
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions. Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions revenue is derived from
integrated solutions (including solution implementations, software support and maintenance and
training service) and software licenses provided during our customer yield improvement engagements
and solution product sales.
Integrated Solutions. The increase in integrated solutions revenue of $5.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 was
primarily attributable to increases in yield integration services, software integration services
and maintenance revenues. Our integrated solutions revenue may fluctuate in the future and is
dependent on a number of factors including our ability to obtain new customers at emerging
technology nodes and our ability to estimate costs associated with such contracts, as well as our
customers willingness to renew their software maintenance contracts.
Software Licenses. The decrease in software licenses revenue of $2.8 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 was due to
slower adoption of our software applications by new and existing customers, partially offset by
the addition of new software offerings as a result of the acquisition of Si Automation in October
2006. Software license revenue may fluctuate in the future and is dependent upon a number of
factors including the semiconductor industrys acceptance of our products, our ability to attract
new customers and further penetration of our current customer base.
Gain Share. Gain share revenue represents profit sharing and performance incentives earned
based upon our customer reaching certain defined operational levels. Gain share revenue increased
by $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2006, primarily the result of higher wafer fees earned on gain share contracts and
increases in customer wafer volumes. We expect our gain share revenue will fluctuate from period to
period. Our continued receipt of gain share revenue is dependent on many factors that are outside
of our control, including among others, continued production of ICs by our customers, sustained
yield improvements by our customers and our ability to enter into new Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions contracts containing gain share provisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Cost of Design-to-Silicon Yield Solutions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of design-to-silicon- yield
solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
|
$ |
6,734 |
|
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Software licenses |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired technology |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,431 |
|
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions. Direct costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions consists of costs incurred to provide and support our integrated solutions and costs
recognized in connection with licensing our software.
Integrated Solutions. Integrated solutions costs consist of material, labor, stock-based
compensation, and overhead costs associated with solution implementations and software support.
Costs include purchased materials, employee compensation and benefits, travel and
facilities-related costs. The increase in direct cost of $1.3 million is primarily due to the
acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006, an increase in distribution of our pdFastest
products, increased travel expenses, and increased expenses associated with outside consultants.
If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or
we do not manage the projects properly within the planned period of time or satisfy our
obligations under contracts,
resulting contract margins could be materially different from those anticipated when the
contract was executed. Any such reductions in contract margin could have a material negative
impact on our operating results.
20
Software Licenses. Software license costs consist of costs associated with licensing
third-party software sold in conjunction with our software products and expenses incurred to
produce and distribute our product documentation. The direct costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions software licenses decreased slightly for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. We expect the cost of software licenses to
fluctuate in the future as a result of royalties and license fees paid for third-party
applications incorporated in our software products.
Amortization of Acquired Technology. Amortization of acquired technology consists of the
amortization of intangibles acquired as a result of certain business combinations. The amortization
of acquired technology expense increased $65,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, as a result of the acquisition of Si
Automation S.A. in October 2006 and Fabbrix, Inc. in May 2007, which was offset by certain
intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the third quarter of fiscal year 2007. We
anticipate amortization of acquired technology to be $631,000 for the remaining three months in
2007, $2.5 million in 2008, $2.5 million in 2009, $2.3 million in 2010, and $1.8 million
thereafter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Research and Development |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
9,008 |
|
|
$ |
6,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of
personnel-related costs to support product development activities, including compensation and
benefits, stock-based compensation, outside development services, travel and facilities cost
allocations. The increase in research and development expenses of $2.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily the
result of the acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006, and to a lesser extent to
increases in personnel expenses, operating expenses associated with the expansion of our office in
China, and third-party developer costs for product development strategic initiatives. We anticipate
that we will continue to commit considerable resources to research and development in the future
and that these expenses may increase in absolute dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
5,789 |
|
|
$ |
5,028 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist
primarily of compensation and benefits for sales, marketing and general and administrative
personnel in addition to outside sales commissions, fees for legal and accounting services,
stock-based compensation, marketing communications, travel and facilities cost allocations. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $761,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to
increased operating costs as a result of the acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006,
increased personnel costs, and expenses associated with the opening of our office in Korea,
partially offset by decreases in outside sales commissions, legal fees, and tax services. We expect
that selling, general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars to support
increased selling and administrative efforts in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Amortization of Other Acquired |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other
acquired intangible assets |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
|
319 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization of other acquired intangible
assets consists of the amortization of intangibles acquired as a result of certain business
combinations. Amortization of other acquired intangible assets for the three months ended September
30, 2007 increased $750,000 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 as a result of
the acquisition
of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006 and Fabbrix, Inc. in May 2007. We anticipate
amortization of these other acquired intangible assets to decrease in future periods as certain
intangible assets will become fully amortized during 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Interest and Other Income, net |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
(570 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income, net. The decrease in interest and other income, net of $570,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006 was
primarily due to lower average cash, cash equivalent, and short term investments balance during the
period as a result of the repurchase of treasury stock, payments made in connection with the
acquisitions of Si Automation S.A. and Fabbrix, Inc., and to foreign currency losses associated
with our foreign operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
(327 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
( |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision (Benefit). The income tax provision increased $167,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, as a result
of the change in applicable effective tax rates due to business tax credits earned and a decrease
in taxable income.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Revenue |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-silicon-yield solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
$ |
46,090 |
|
|
$ |
33,859 |
|
|
$ |
12,231 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
Software licenses |
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
8,217 |
|
|
|
(1,989 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Gain share |
|
|
17,590 |
|
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
69,908 |
|
|
$ |
57,231 |
|
|
$ |
12,677 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions.
Integrated Solutions. The increase in integrated solutions revenue of $12.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was
primarily attributable to an increase in software related integration services, maintenance
revenues and solution implementations.
Software Licenses. The decrease in software licenses revenue of $2.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was due to
slower adoption of our software applications by new and existing customers, partially offset by
the addition of new software offerings as a result of the acquisition of Si Automation in October
2006.
Gain Share. Gain share revenue increased by $2.4 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006, primarily the result of higher wafer
fees earned on gain share contracts and increases in customer wafer volumes.
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Cost of Design-to-Silicon Yield Solutions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of design-to-silicon- yield
solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated solutions |
|
$ |
22,842 |
|
|
$ |
19,808 |
|
|
$ |
3,034 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Software licenses |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired technology |
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,492 |
|
|
$ |
23,704 |
|
|
$ |
3,788 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield Solutions.
Integrated Solutions. The increase in direct costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield integrated
solutions of $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to increased expenses as a result of
our acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006, travel expenses, costs associated with the
deployment of our pdFastest products, and outside consultant costs.
Software Licenses. The increase in direct costs of Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions
software licenses of $36,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 was attributable to an increase in third party software license
fees and royalties.
Amortization of Acquired Technology. The amortization of acquired technology expense increased
$718,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2006, as a result of the acquisitions of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006 and Fabbrix, Inc.
in May 2007, partially offset by certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Research and Development |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
26,175 |
|
|
$ |
19,543 |
|
|
$ |
6,632 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development. The increase in research and development expenses of $6.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006
was primarily due to the acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006, and to a lesser extent
to increases in third party development costs associated with certain product development strategic
initiatives, the expansion of our office in China, and increased personnel costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Selling, General and Administrative |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
18,278 |
|
|
$ |
14,850 |
|
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative. The increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses of $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to increased operating costs as a result of the
acquisition of Si Automation S.A. in October 2006, and to a lesser extent to increases in outside
sales commissions, accounting fees, expenses associated with outside consultants, and expenses
associated with the opening of Korea office, partially offset by a decrease in employee
commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangible Assets |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other
acquired intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,029 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
|
|
330 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization of other acquired intangible
assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $2.3 million compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 primarily the result of the acquisition of Si Automation S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Interest and Other Income, net |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
(991 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
)% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income, Net. The decrease in interest and other income, net of $991,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was
primarily due to lower average cash, cash equivalent, and short-term investments balance during the
period as a result of repurchases of treasury stock, payments made in connection with the
acquisitions of Si Automation S.A. and Fabbrix, Inc., and to foreign currency losses associated
with our foreign operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
% of |
|
|
% of |
|
Income Tax Provision |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
(In thousands, except for %s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
(500 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision decreased $500,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 due to the decrease in
taxable income and the change in applicable effective tax rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.6 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $6.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. After adjusting the net loss of $4.0 million by the amortization of
acquired intangible assets of $7.6 million, depreciation and amortization of $1.5 million,
stock-based compensation of $5.5 million, the tax benefit related to stock-based compensation plans
of $223,000, the excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation of $43,000, and deferred taxes of
$3.7 million, our adjusted results provided approximately $7.0 million in cash. Net cash used by
changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition, of $1.4 million, was the
result of increases in accounts receivable of $5.0 million, decrease in accounts payable of $1.1
million, other accrued liabilities of $489,000, partially offset by decrease in prepaid expenses
and other assets of $11,000, increases in accrued compensation and related benefits of $662,000,
taxes payable of $3.8 million, deferred revenue of $516,000, and billings in excess of recognized
revenue of $206,000. The increases in accounts receivable, and billings in excess of recognized
revenue were due to increased revenues during the period as well as the timing of billing
milestones specified in the contract agreements. The decreases in accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities were due to the timing of vendor payments. The increase in deferred revenue was
primarily due to renewals of software support and maintenance contracts. The increase in taxes
payable was due to the expected taxable income for the year and the increase in uncertain tax
benefits related to tax credits earned during the period. The increase in deferred taxes was due to
additional tax credits earned during the period.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $857,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 from $18.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The decrease
was primarily the result of a decrease in purchases of securities available-for-sale to $20.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $42.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 also included
$1.9 million for payments associated with the acquisition of Si Automation S.A and $2.7 million for
payments associated with the acquisition of Fabbrix, Inc. compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 when there were no such acquisitions. In both periods, investing activities
included purchases of property and equipment, principally computer hardware and software, of $1.7
million and $1.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006,
respectively.
Net
cash used in financing activities was $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $4.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 primarily consisted of $4.5 million in stock repurchases and $683,000 in debt
payments, partially offset by $1.3 million in proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options
and $782,000 in proceeds from the issuance of shares under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Net
cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily
consisted of $3.4 million in proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, $978,000 in
proceeds from the issuance of shares under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and $286,000 in
excess tax benefit derived from stock-based compensation.
24
As of September 30, 2007, our working capital was $69.8 million, compared with $66.6 million
as of December 31, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents, and short term investments as of September 30,
2007 were $50.0 million compared to $52.9 million as of December 31, 2006, a decrease of $2.9
million. We expect to experience growth in our overall expenses, as we continue to execute our
business plan. As a result, we anticipate that our overall expenses, as well as planned capital
expenditures, may constitute a material use of our cash resources. In addition, we may use cash
resources to fund potential investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary products,
technologies or businesses. We believe that our existing cash resources and anticipated funds from
operations will satisfy our cash requirements to fund our operating activities, capital
expenditures and other obligations for at least the next twelve months. However, in the event that
during such period, or thereafter, we are not successful in generating sufficient cash flows from
operations we may need to raise additional capital through private or public financings, strategic
relationships or other arrangements, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at
all.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or
undisclosed borrowings or debt, other than operating leases on our facilities. Additionally, we
have not entered into any derivative contracts. As of September 30, 2007, we had no foreign
currency contracts outstanding.
The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations as of September 30, 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations |
|
remaining) |
|
|
2008-2009 |
|
|
2010-2011 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Debt principal (1) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
Debt interest |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
Capital lease obligations (including interest) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
2,434 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
5,355 |
|
|
$ |
9,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the repayment of an interest free loan of 550,000 and a 400,000 loan which
carries a variable interest rate based on the EURIBOR plus 160 basis points. |
|
(2) |
|
Due to the inherent uncertainty of the tax positions, it is not practicable to assign this
liability to any particular years in the table. |
Operating lease amounts include minimum rental payments under our operating leases for our
office facilities, as well as computers, office equipment, and vehicles that we utilize under lease
agreements. These agreements expire at various dates through 2012. Capital lease amounts include
$17,000 of imputed interest. Capital leases were contracted to purchase computer, software, office
equipment, and vehicles in our French subsidiary.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurement that
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Additionally, the pronouncement provides guidance on the definition, measurement, methodology and
use of assumptions and inputs in determining fair value. The pronouncement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157
on our financial statements.
Effective
January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of the FASBs EITF No. 06-2,
Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No.
43 (EITF No. 06-2). Prior to the issuance of EITF No. 06-2
we accounted for sabbatical expense under SFAS No. 43, by expensing the cost of compensated
absences for sabbatical programs as incurred. EITF No. 06-2 requires companies to accrue the
cost of such compensated absences over the requisite service period. The Task Force allows the
use of one of two specified methodologies for adopting the change in accounting principle:
i) a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the year of adoption;
or ii) retrospective application to all prior periods. We elected to use the cumulative-effect
adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings resulting in an additional liability of
$1.4 million, an additional deferred tax asset of $587,000, and an increase in the accumulated
deficit of $845,000. Under this transition method, prior periods were not restated and accrued
expenses as of September 30, 2007 include accrued sabbatical expense for all employees who are
eligible for sabbatical leave.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS
No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain
other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities choosing the
fair value option would be required to recognize subsequent changes in the fair value of those
instruments and other items directly in earnings. This standard also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for
fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 159 on our financial statements.
25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The following discusses our exposure to market risk related to changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates. We do not currently own any equity investments, nor do we expect
to own any in the foreseeable future. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are
subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could vary materially as a result of a
number of factors.
Interest Rate Risk. As of September 30, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents and short term
investments of $50.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash, highly liquid money
market instruments and commercial paper with maturities of 90 days or less. Short-term investments
consisted of debt securities with maturities of more than three months but less than twelve months.
Because of the short maturities of those instruments, a sudden change in market interest rates
would not have a material impact on the fair value of the portfolio. We would not expect our
operating results or cash flows to be materially affected by a sudden change in market interest on
our portfolio. A hypothetical increase in market interest rates of 100 basis points from the market
rates in effect at September 30, 2007 would cause the fair value of these investments to decrease
by an immaterial amount which would not have significantly impacted our financial position or
results of operations. Declines in interest rates over time will result in lower interest income
and increased interest expense.
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk. Certain of our sales contracts with our German subsidiary
and our French subsidiary are priced in US Dollars and, therefore, a portion of our revenue is
subject to foreign currency risks. The effect of an immediate 10% adverse change in exchange rates
on foreign denominated receivables as of September 30, 2007 would result in a loss of approximately
$93,000. To date, we have not entered into any hedging contracts, although we may do so in the
future. We intend to monitor our foreign currency exposure. Future exchange rate fluctuations may
have a material negative impact on our business.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the
Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the timeframes specified in
the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (ii) is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph
(d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Currently we are not party to any material legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
If semiconductor designers and manufacturers do not continue to adopt our Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions, we may be unable to increase or maintain our revenue.
If semiconductor designers and manufacturers do not continue to adopt our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions, both as currently comprised and as we may offer them in the
future, our revenue could decline. To be successful, we will need to continue to enter into
agreements covering a larger number of IC products and processes with existing customers and new
customers. We need to target as new customers additional integrated device manufacturers (IDM),
fabless semiconductor companies, and foundries, as well as system manufacturers. Factors that may
limit adoption of our Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions by semiconductor companies include:
26
|
|
|
our customers failure to achieve satisfactory yield improvements using our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for semiconductors generally or the demand for deep submicron
semiconductors failing to grow as rapidly as expected; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to develop, market, or sell effective solutions that are outside of our
traditional MPS logic focus; |
|
|
|
|
the industry may develop alternative methods to enhance the integration between the
semiconductor design and manufacturing processes due to a rapidly evolving market and the
likely emergence of new technologies; |
|
|
|
|
our existing and potential customers reluctance to understand and accept our innovative
gain share fee component; and |
|
|
|
|
our customers concern about our ability to keep highly competitive information
confidential. |
We generate a large percentage of our total revenue from a limited number of customers, so the
loss of any one of these customers could significantly reduce our revenue and results of
operations below expectations.
Historically, we have had a small number of large customers for our core
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions and we expect this to continue in the near term. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, two customers accounted for 34% of our total net revenue, with
Toshiba Corporation representing 18% and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
representing 16%. In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, three customers accounted for 49% of
our total net revenue, with IBM representing 27%, Toshiba Corporation representing 12%, and
Chartered Semiconductor representing 10%, respectively. We could lose a customer due to such
customers decision not to engage us on future process nodes, its decision not to develop its own
future process node, or as a result of industry consolidation. The loss of any of these customers
or a decrease in the sales volumes of their products could significantly reduce our total revenue
below expectations. In particular, such a loss could cause significant fluctuations in results of
operations because our expenses are fixed in the short term and it takes us a long time to replace
customers.
If integrated device manufacturers of logic integrated circuits reduce investment in new process
technology as a result of a shift to a fabless manufacturing business model, the pool of potential
logic customers for our yield ramp solutions will shrink and our results of operations may suffer.
Historically, the majority of our revenue from integrated yield ramps has been derived from
integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) of logic integrated circuits (ICs). If IDMs decide to
discontinue or significantly cut back their investment in the development of new process technology
as a result of a shift to a model of outsourcing a larger proportion, or all, of the mass
production of their ICs, there may be fewer IDMs that are potential customers for our solutions
that integrate product designs with in-house manufacturing processes. As a result, the revenue we
are able to generate from integrated yield ramps for logic ICs could fall below levels that are
currently expected. Also, because our expenses are fixed in the short term and it takes a long time
for us to replace customers, such a reduction in revenue could cause significant fluctuations in
our results of operations.
We must effectively manage and support our operations and recent and planned growth in order for
our business strategy to succeed.
We will need to continue to grow in all areas of operation and successfully integrate and
support our existing and new employees into our operations, or we may be unable to implement our
business strategy in the time frame we anticipate, if at all. We have in the past, and may in the
future, experience interruptions in our information systems on which our global operations depend.
Further, physical damage to, failure of, or digital damage (such as significant viruses or worms)
to, our information systems could disrupt and delay time-sensitive services or computing operations
that we perform for our customers, which could negatively impact our business results and
reputation. We may need to switch to a new accounting system in the near future, which could
disrupt our business operations and distract management. In addition, we will need to expand our
intranet to support new data centers to enhance our research and development efforts. Our intranet
is expensive to expand and must be highly secure due to the sensitive nature of our customers
information that we transmit. Building and managing the support necessary for our growth places
significant demands on our management and resources. These demands may divert these resources from
the continued growth of our business and implementation of our business strategy. Further, we must
adequately train our new personnel, especially our client service and technical support personnel,
to effectively and accurately, respond to and support our customers. If we fail to do this, it
could lead to dissatisfaction among our customers, which could slow our growth.
27
If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, customers or potential competitors may be
able to use our technologies to develop their own solutions which could weaken our competitive
position, reduce our revenue, or increase our costs.
Our success depends largely on the proprietary nature of our technologies. We currently rely
primarily on contractual, patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret protection. Our pending
patent applications may not result in issued patents, and even if issued, they may not be
sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technologies. Also, patent protection in foreign
countries may be limited or unavailable where we need such protection. Litigation may be necessary
from time to time to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and
scope of the proprietary rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our
proprietary rights and incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Litigation could also divert
our resources, including our managerial and engineering resources.
Competition in the market for solutions that address yield improvement and integration between IC
design and manufacturing may intensify in the future, which could slow our ability to grow or
execute our strategy.
Competition in our market may intensify in the future, which could slow our ability to grow or
execute our strategy and could lead to increased pricing pressure. Our current and potential
customers may choose to develop their own solutions internally, particularly if we are slow in
deploying our solutions. Many of these companies have the financial and technical capability to
develop their own solutions. Also, competitors could establish non-domestic operations with a lower
cost structure than our engineering organization, which, unless we also establish lower cost
non-domestic operations, would give any such competitors products a competitive advantage over our
solutions. There may be other providers of commercial solutions for systematic IC yield and
performance enhancement of which we are not aware. We currently face indirect competition from the
internal groups at IC companies and some direct competition from providers of yield management or
prediction software such as Ponte Solutions, Predictions Software, Syntricity Inc., TIBCO (through
its acquisition of Spotfire Inc.), Synopsys Inc. (through its acquisition of HPL Technologies), and
Yield Dynamics, Inc., and process control software, such as Triant Holdings Inc., Straatum
Processware Ltd., and MKS Instruments Inc. Some providers of yield management software or
inspection equipment may seek to broaden their product offerings and compete with us. For example,
KLA-Tencor has announced adding the use of test structures to one of their inspection product
lines. In addition, we believe that the demand for solutions that address the need for better
integration between the silicon design and manufacturing processes may encourage direct competitors
to enter into our market. For example, large integrated organizations, such as IDMs, electronic
design automation software providers, IC design service companies or semiconductor equipment
vendors, may decide to spin-off a business unit that competes with us. Other potential competitors
include fabrication facilities that may decide to offer solutions competitive with ours as part of
their value proposition to their customers. In addition, Synopsys, Inc. now appears to offer
directly competing Design for Manufacturability (DFM)
capability, while other Electronic Design Automation (EDA) suppliers provide alternative DFM solutions that
may compete for the same budgetary funds. If these potential competitors change the pricing
environment or are able to attract industry partners or customers faster than we can, we may not be
able to grow and execute our strategy as quickly or at all. In addition, customer preferences may
shift away from our solutions as a result of the increase in competition.
We face operational and financial risks associated with international operations.
We derive a majority of our revenue from international sales, principally from customers based
in Asia. Revenue generated from customers in Asia accounted for 54% of total revenue in the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 revenue generated
from customers in Asia was 50% of total revenue. We expect that a significant portion of our total
future revenue will continue to be derived from companies based in Asia. In addition, we have
expanded our non-U.S. operations recently and plan to continue such expansion by establishing
overseas subsidiaries, offices, or contractor relationships in locations, and when, deemed
appropriate by our management. The success of our business is subject to risks inherent in doing
business internationally, including third-party vendors that provide certain software quality
assurance and other services having operations in the Middle East. These risks include:
|
|
|
some of our key engineers and other personnel who are foreign nationals may have
difficulty gaining access to the United States and other countries in which our customers or
our offices may be located and it may be difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified
technical and managerial employees in foreign offices; |
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting account receivables resulting in longer collection
periods; |
28
|
|
|
language and other cultural differences may inhibit our sales and marketing efforts and
create internal communication problems among our U.S. and foreign research and development
teams, increasing the difficulty of managing multiple, remote locations performing various
development, quality assurance, and yield ramp analysis projects; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with, and unexpected changes in, a wide variety of foreign laws and regulatory
environments with which we are not familiar, including, among other issues, with respect to
protection of our intellectual property, and a wide variety of trade and export controls
under domestic, foreign, and international law; |
|
|
|
|
currency risk due to the fact that expenses for our international offices are denominated
in the local currency, including the Euro, while virtually all of our revenue is denominated
in U.S. dollars; |
|
|
|
|
quarantine, private travel limitation, or business disruption in regions affecting our
operations, stemming from actual, imminent or perceived outbreak of human pandemic or
contagious disease; |
|
|
|
|
in the event a larger portion of our revenue becomes denominated in foreign currencies,
we would be subject to a potentially significant exchange rate risk; and |
|
|
|
|
economic or political instability, including but not limited to armed conflict,
terrorism, and the resulting disruption to economic activity and business operations. |
In Japan, in particular, we face the following additional risks:
|
|
|
any recurrence of an overall downturn in Asian economies could limit our ability to
retain existing customers and attract new ones in Asia; and |
|
|
|
|
if the U.S. dollar increases in value relative to the Japanese Yen, the cost of our
solutions will be more expensive to existing and potential Japanese customers and therefore
less competitive. |
Our earnings per share and other key operating results may be unusually high in a given quarter,
thereby raising investors expectations, and then unusually low in the next quarter, thereby
disappointing investors, which could cause our stock price to drop.
Historically, our quarterly operating results have fluctuated. Our future quarterly operating
results will likely fluctuate from time to time and may not meet the expectations of securities
analysts and investors in some future period. The price of our common stock could decline due to
such fluctuations. The following factors may cause significant fluctuations in our future quarterly
operating results:
|
|
|
the size and timing of sales volumes achieved by our customers products; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of any of our large customers or an adverse change in any of our large
customers businesses; |
|
|
|
|
the size of improvements in our customers yield and the timing of agreement as to those
improvements; |
|
|
|
|
our long and variable sales cycle; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of our revenue; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the level of our operating expenses needed to support our projected growth;
and |
|
|
|
|
delays in completing solution implementations for our customers. |
Our gain share revenue is dependent on factors outside of our control, including the volume of
integrated circuits, or ICs, our customers are able to sell to their customers.
Our gain share revenue for a particular product is largely determined by the volume of that
product that our customer is able to sell to its customers, which is outside of our control. We
have limited ability to predict the success or failure of our customers IC
29
products. Further, our customers may implement changes to their manufacturing processes during
the gain share period, which could negatively affect yield results, which is beyond our control. We
may commit a significant amount of time and resources to a customer who is ultimately unable to
sell as many units as we had anticipated when contracting with them or who makes unplanned changes
to their processes. Since we currently work on a small number of large projects, any product that
does not achieve commercial viability or a significant increase in yield could significantly reduce
our revenue and results of operations below expectations. In addition, if we work with two directly
competitive products, volume in one may offset volume, and any of our related gain share, in the
other product. Further, decreased demand for semiconductor products decreases the volume of
products our customers are able to sell, which may adversely affect our gain share revenue.
Gain share measurement requires data collection and is subject to customer agreement, which can
result in uncertainty and cause quarterly results to fluctuate.
We can only recognize gain share revenue once we have reached agreement with our customers on
their level of yield performance improvements. Because measuring the amount of yield improvement is
inherently complicated and dependent on our customers internal information systems, there may be
uncertainty as to some components of measurement. This could result in our recognition of less
revenue than expected. In addition, any delay in measuring gain share could cause all of the
associated revenue to be delayed until the next quarter. Since we currently have only a few large
customers and we are relying on gain share as a significant component of our total revenue, any
delay could significantly harm our quarterly results.
Changes in the structure of our customer contracts, including the mix between fixed and variable
revenue and the mix of elements, can adversely affect the size and timing of our total revenue.
Our long-term success is largely dependent upon our ability to structure our future customer
contracts to include a larger gain share component relative to the fixed fee component. If we are
successful in increasing the gain share component of our customer contracts, we will experience an
adverse impact on our operating results in the short term as we reduce the fixed fee component,
which we typically recognize earlier than gain share fees. Due to acquisitions and expanded
business strategies, the mix of elements in some of our contracts has changed recently and the
relative importance of the software component in some of our contracts has increased. We have
experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in the expected recognition of revenue
associated with generally accepted accounting principles regarding the timing of revenue
recognition in multi-element software arrangements, including the effect of acceptance criteria as
a result of the change in our contracts. If we fail to meet contractual acceptance criteria on time
or at all, the total revenue we receive under a contract could be delayed or decline. In addition,
by increasing the gain share or the software component, we may increase the variability or timing
of recognition of our revenue, and therefore increase the risk that our total future revenue will
be lower than expected and fluctuate significantly from period to period.
It typically takes us a long time to sell our unique solutions to new customers, which can result
in uncertainty and delays in generating additional revenue.
Because our gain share business model is unique and our Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions are
unfamiliar, our sales cycle is lengthy and requires a significant amount of our senior managements
time and effort. Furthermore, we need to target those individuals within a customers organization
who have overall responsibility for the profitability of an IC. These individuals tend to be senior
management or executive officers. We may face difficulty identifying and establishing contact with
such individuals. Even after initial acceptance, due to the complexity of structuring the gain
share component, the negotiation and documentation processes can be lengthy. It can take nine
months or more to reach a signed contract with a customer. Unexpected delays in our sales cycle
could cause our revenue to fall short of expectations.
We have a history of losses, we may incur losses in the future and we may be unable to maintain
profitability.
We have experienced losses in the past and in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. We may not achieve and thereafter maintain profitability if
our revenue increases more slowly than we expect or not at all. In addition, virtually all of our
operating expenses are fixed in the short term, so any shortfall in anticipated revenue in a given
period could significantly reduce our operating results below expectations. Our accumulated deficit
was $18.4 million as of September 30, 2007. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses in
connection with:
|
|
|
funding for research and development; |
|
|
|
|
expansion of our solution implementation teams; |
30
|
|
|
expansion of our sales and marketing efforts; and |
|
|
|
|
additional non-cash charges relating to amortization of intangibles and stock-based
compensation. |
As a result, we will need to significantly increase revenue to maintain profitability on a
quarterly or annual basis. Any of these factors could cause our stock price to decline.
We may experience significant fluctuations in operating results due to the cyclical nature of the
semiconductor industry.
Our revenue is highly dependent upon the overall condition of the semiconductor industry,
especially in light of our gain share revenue component. The semiconductor industry is highly
cyclical and subject to rapid technological change and has been subject to significant economic
downturns at various times, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of
average selling prices, and production overcapacity. The semiconductor industry also periodically
experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints. As a result, we may experience
significant fluctuations in operating results due to general semiconductor industry conditions and
overall economic conditions.
We must continually attract and retain highly talented executives, engineers, and research and
development personnel or we will be unable to expand our business as planned.
We will need to continue to hire highly talented executives, engineers, and research and
development personnel to support our planned growth. We have experienced, and we expect to continue
to experience, delays and limitations in hiring and retaining highly skilled individuals with
appropriate qualifications. We intend to continue to hire foreign nationals, particularly as we
expand our operations internationally. We have had, and expect to continue to have, difficulty in
obtaining visas permitting entry into the United States for several of our key personnel, which
disrupts our ability to strategically locate our personnel. If we lose the services of any of our
key executives or a significant number of our engineers, it could disrupt our ability to implement
our business strategy. Competition for executives and qualified engineers can be intense,
especially in Silicon Valley where we are principally based.
If our products, technologies, services, and integrated solutions fail to keep pace with the rapid
technological changes in the semiconductor industry, we could lose customers and revenue.
We must continually devote significant engineering resources to enable us to keep up with the
rapidly evolving technologies and equipment used in the semiconductor design and manufacturing
processes. These innovations are inherently complex and require long development cycles. Not only
do we need the technical expertise to implement the changes necessary to keep our technologies
current, we also rely heavily on the judgment of our advisors and management to anticipate future
market trends. Our customers expect us to stay ahead of the technology curve and expect that our
products, technologies, services, and integrated solutions will support any new design or
manufacturing processes or materials as soon as they are deployed. If we are not able to timely
predict industry changes, or if we are unable to modify our products, technologies, services, and
integrated solutions on a timely basis, our existing solutions will be rendered obsolete and we may
lose customers. If we do not keep pace with technology, our existing and potential customers may
choose to develop their own solutions internally as an alternative to ours and we could lose market
share, which could adversely affect our operating results.
We intend to pursue additional strategic relationships, which are necessary to maximize our
growth, but could substantially divert management attention and resources.
In order to establish and maintain strategic relationships with industry leaders at each stage
of the IC design and manufacturing processes, we may need to expend significant resources and will
need to commit a significant amount of managements time and attention, with no guarantee of
success. If we are unable to enter into strategic relationships with these companies, we will not
be as effective at modeling existing technologies or at keeping ahead of the technology curve as
new technologies are introduced. In the past, the absence of an established working relationship
with key companies in the industry has meant that we have had to exclude the effect of their
component parts from our modeling analysis, which reduces the overall effectiveness of our analysis
and limits our ability to improve yield. We may be unable to establish key industry strategic
relationships if any of the following occur:
|
|
|
potential industry partners become concerned about our ability to protect their
intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
potential industry partners develop their own solutions to address the need for yield
improvement; |
|
|
|
|
our potential competitors establish relationships with industry partners with which we
seek to establish a relationship; or |
|
|
|
|
potential industry partners attempt to restrict our ability to enter into relationships
with their competitors. |
31
Our solution implementations may take longer than we anticipate, which could cause us to lose
customers and may result in adjustments to our operating results.
Our solution implementations require a team of engineers to collaborate with our customers to
address complex yield loss issues by using our software and other technologies. We must estimate
the amount of time needed to complete an existing solution implementation in order to estimate when
the engineers will be able to commence a new solution implementation. In addition, our accounting
for solution implementation contracts, which generate fixed fees, sometimes require adjustments to
profit and loss based on revised estimates during the performance of the contract. These
adjustments may have a material effect on our results of operations in the period in which they are
made. The estimates giving rise to these risks, which are inherent in fixed-price contracts,
include the forecasting of costs and schedules, and contract revenues related to contract
performance.
Key executives, including our chief executive officer and our chief strategy officer, are critical
to our business and we cannot guarantee that they will remain with us indefinitely.
Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued services of our key
executives, including John Kibarian, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and David Joseph,
our Chief Strategy Officer. If we lose the services of any of our key executives, it could slow
execution of our business plan, hinder our product development processes and impair our sales
efforts. Searching for replacements could divert other senior managements time and increase our
operating expenses. In addition, our industry partners and customers could become concerned about
our future operations, which could injure our reputation. We do not have long-term employment
agreements with our executives and we do not maintain any key person life insurance policies on
their lives.
Inadvertent disclosure of our customers confidential information could result in costly
litigation and cause us to lose existing and potential customers.
Our customers consider their product yield information and other confidential information,
which we must gather in the course of our engagement with the customer, to be extremely
competitively sensitive. If we inadvertently disclosed or were required to disclose this
information, we would likely lose existing and potential customers and could be subject to costly
litigation. In addition, to avoid potential disclosure of confidential information to competitors,
some of our customers may, in the future, ask us not to work with key competitive products.
Our technologies could infringe the intellectual property rights of others causing costly
litigation and the loss of significant rights.
Significant litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the semiconductor
industry. It is possible that a third party may claim that our technologies infringe their
intellectual property rights or misappropriate their trade secrets. Any claim, even if without
merit, could be time consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, or require us to enter into
royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. A
successful claim of infringement against us in connection with the use of our technologies could
result in additional costs and adversely affect our business.
Defects in our proprietary technologies, hardware and software tools, and the cost of support to
remedy any such defects could decrease our revenue and our competitive market share.
If the software, hardware, or proprietary technologies we provide to a customer contain
defects that increase our customers cost of goods sold and time to market, these defects could
significantly decrease the market acceptance of our solutions. Further, the cost of support
resources required to remedy any defects in our technologies, hardware, or software tools could
exceed our expectations. Any actual or perceived defects with our software, hardware, or
proprietary technologies may also hinder our ability to attract or retain industry partners or
customers, leading to a decrease in our revenue. These defects are frequently found during the
period following introduction of new software, hardware, or proprietary technologies or
enhancements to existing software, hardware, or proprietary technologies. Our software, hardware,
and proprietary technologies may contain errors not discovered until after customer implementation
of the silicon design and manufacturing process recommended by us. If our software, hardware, or
proprietary technologies contain errors or defects, it could require us to expend significant
resources to alleviate these problems, which could reduce margins and result in the diversion of
technical and other resources from our other development efforts.
32
Failing to maintain the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could cause
the cost related to remediation to increase and could cause our stock price to decline.
In the future, our management may identify deficiencies regarding the design and effectiveness
of our system of internal control over financial reporting that we engage in pursuant to Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such deficiencies could
include those arising from turnover of qualified personnel or arising as a result of acquisitions,
which we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the continuing reporting deadlines imposed by
Section 404 and the costs of which may harm our results of operations. In addition, if we fail to
maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or
amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that our management can conclude on an
ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls. We also may not be able to retain
independent auditors with sufficient resources to attest to and report on our internal controls in
a timely manner. Moreover, our auditors may not agree with our managements future assessments and
may deem our controls as ineffective if we are unable to remediate on a timely basis. If in the
future we are unable to assert that we maintain effective internal controls, our investors could
lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports that in turn could cause
our stock price to decline.
We may not be able to expand our business and proprietary technologies if we do not consummate
potential acquisitions or investments or successfully integrate them with our business.
To expand our proprietary technologies, we may acquire or make investments in complementary
businesses, technologies, or products if appropriate opportunities arise. We may be unable to
identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates at reasonable prices or on reasonable terms,
or consummate future acquisitions or investments, each of which could slow our growth strategy. We
may have difficulty integrating the acquired products, personnel or technologies of any
acquisitions we might make. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our
management and employees and increase our expenses.
We may not be able to raise necessary funds to support our growth or execute our strategy.
Unanticipated efforts to support more rapid expansion, develop or enhance
Design-to-Silicon-Yield solutions, respond to competitive pressures or acquire complementary
businesses or technologies could impact our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our
available funds. In such event, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private
financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. We may not be able to raise any
necessary funds on terms favorable to us, or at all.
Recent acquisitions may adversely affect our business by diverting managements attention,
increasing our expenses or by being more difficult to integrate than expected.
Our success in realizing the strategic benefits, the timing of this realization, and growth
opportunities to be gained from incorporating into PDF the operations of recently acquired
businesses, including Si Automation S.A., acquired in October 2006, and Fabbrix, Inc., acquired in
May 2007, depend upon our ability to successfully integrate those businesses. The integration of
acquired businesses is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining
our operations associated with acquired businesses include:
|
|
|
consolidating research and development operations; |
|
|
|
|
retaining key employees; |
|
|
|
|
incorporating acquired products and business technology into our existing product lines; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating effective sales and marketing functions; |
|
|
|
|
preserving research and development, marketing, customer and other important
relationships; and |
|
|
|
|
minimizing the diversion of managements attention from ongoing business concerns. |
33
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(b) Use of Proceeds. Our first registration statement, filed on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-43192) related to our initial public offering was declared effective by the SEC on July 26,
2001. There has been no change to the disclosure contained in our report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006, as amended, with respect to the use of proceeds generated by our initial
public offering.
(c) Stock Repurchases. The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by
or on behalf of the Company or any affiliated purchaser (as the term is defined in Rule
10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of our common stock during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Units) that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Units) |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs(1) |
|
Month #1 (July 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,451,236 |
|
Month #2 (August 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007) |
|
|
437,287 |
|
|
$ |
10.18 |
|
|
|
437,287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Month #3 (September 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
437,287 |
|
|
$ |
10.18 |
|
|
|
437,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 26, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase
program, pursuant to which up to $10.0 million of our outstanding common stock may be
repurchased; the repurchase program has no set expiration or termination date. As of September
30, 2007, 987,808 shares had been repurchased under this program at a weighted average per
share price of $10.12, and the repurchase program has been completed. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
34
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.01 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PDF Solutions, Inc. * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of PDF Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated July 6, 2001* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
2001 Stock Plan and related agreements *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
|
Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and
Administration pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01 |
|
|
Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02 |
|
|
Certification the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and
Administration pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **** |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2005 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 7 filed
July 9, 2001 (File No. 333-43192). |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed September 6, 2001 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2007 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
**** |
|
As contemplated by SEC Release No. 33-8212, these exhibits are furnished with this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
are not incorporated by reference in any filing of PDF Solutions, Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date
hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ JOHN K. KIBARIAN
|
|
|
|
John K. Kibarian |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ KEITH A. JONES
|
|
|
|
Keith A. Jones |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.01 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PDF Solutions, Inc.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of PDF Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated July 6, 2001* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
2001 Stock Plan and related agreements *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
|
Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and Administration pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01 |
|
|
Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02 |
|
|
Certification the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and Administration pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **** |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2005 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 7 filed
July 9, 2001 (File No. 333-43192). |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed September 6, 2001 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to PDFs Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2007 (File No.
000-31311). |
|
**** |
|
As contemplated by SEC Release No. 33-8212, these exhibits are furnished with this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
are not incorporated by reference in any filing of PDF Solutions, Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date
hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. |
37