Dana Holding Corporation 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2008
Commission File Number: 1-1063
Dana Holding Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
26-1531856 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio
|
|
43615 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(419) 535-4500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o
SEC 1296(02-08) Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in
this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at August 1, 2008 |
Common stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
99,854,161 |
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In millions, except per share amounts)
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,894 |
|
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realignment charges, net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
interest, reorganization items and income taxes |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Interest expense (contractual interest of $55 for the
three months ended June 30, 2007, $17 for the one
month ended January 31, 2008 and $105 for the six
months ended June 30, 2007) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Reorganization items, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Fresh start accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Minority interests |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
Preferred stock dividend requirements |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.74 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
$ |
(0.94 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.46 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.74 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
(0.94 |
) |
Net loss per share from
discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share available to
common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.47 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.89 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.76 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
(1.50 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.47 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(0.89 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.76 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4.71 |
|
|
$ |
(1.50 |
) |
Average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $24 in 2008 and $20 in 2007 |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Other |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
Work in process and finished goods |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,482 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, including current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
Debtor-in-possession financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Taxes on income |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
Deferred employee benefits and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, $0.01 par value, 2,500,000 issued and outstanding |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B, $0.01 par value, 5,400,000 issued and outstanding |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 450,000,000 authorized,
99,735,387 issued and outstanding |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana common stock, $1.00 par value, 350,000,000
authorized, 150,245,250 issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
7,482 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of inventory valuation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing charges and original issue discount |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash portion of U.K. pension charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Reorganization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of claims |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items net of cash payments |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Fresh start adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments to VEBAs |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of businesses and assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Change in working capital |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) debtor-in-possession facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
Net change in short-term debt |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Payment of DCC Medium Term Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Exit Facility debt |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Original issue discount fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing fees |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Exit Facility debt |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series A and Series B preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Net change in cash of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007, Prior Dana |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
(468 |
) |
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
$ |
(782 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785 |
|
Cancellation of Prior Dana common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
Elimination of Prior Dana accumulated deficit
and accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2008, Prior Dana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of new equity in connection with
emergence from Chapter 11 |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2008, Dana |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Unrealized investment gains (losses) and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Employee emergence bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008, Dana |
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
2,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
6
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
INDEX TO NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
|
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
2. |
|
Emergence from Chapter 11 |
|
3. |
|
Reorganization Proceedings |
|
4. |
|
Asset Impairments and Divestitures |
|
5. |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
6. |
|
Realignment of Operations |
|
7. |
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
|
8. |
|
Capital Stock |
|
9. |
|
Earnings Per Share |
|
10. |
|
Incentive and Stock Compensation |
|
11. |
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans |
|
12. |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
13. |
|
Cash Deposits |
|
14. |
|
Financing Agreements |
|
15. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
16. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
17. |
|
Warranty Obligations |
|
18. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
19. |
|
Other Income, Net |
|
20. |
|
Segments |
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
Dana Holding Corporation (Dana), incorporated in Delaware, is headquartered in Toledo, Ohio.
We are a leading supplier of axle, driveshaft, structural, sealing and thermal management products
for global vehicle manufacturers. Our people design and manufacture products for every major
vehicle producer in the world. We employ approximately 35,000 people in 26 countries and operate
113 major facilities throughout the world.
As a result of Dana Corporations emergence from Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code (the Bankruptcy Code) on January 31, 2008 (the Effective Date), Dana is the successor
registrant to Dana Corporation (Prior Dana) pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
The terms Dana, we, our, and us, when used in this report with respect to the period
prior to Dana Corporations emergence from bankruptcy, are references to Prior Dana, and when used
with respect to the period commencing after Dana Corporations emergence, are references to Dana.
These references include the subsidiaries of Prior Dana or Dana, as the case may be, unless
otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Financial results for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of anticipated results for the entire year.
This report, as discussed in Note 2, includes the results of the implementation of the Third
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Debtors and Debtors in Possession as modified (the Plan)
and the effects of the adoption of fresh start accounting. In accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), historical financial statements of Prior Dana
will be presented separately from Dana results in this filing and future filings.
The implementation of the Plan and the application of fresh start accounting result in
financial statements that are not comparable to financial statements in periods prior to emergence.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation As discussed in Note 2, the Debtors reorganized under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy
Code (SOP 90-7), which is applicable to companies operating under Chapter 11, generally does not
change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, SOP 90-7 does require that
the financial statements for periods subsequent to the filing of a Chapter 11 petition distinguish
transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing
operations of the business.
We adopted SOP 90-7 on March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date) and prepared our financial statements
in accordance with its requirements through January 31, 2008. Revenues, expenses, realized gains
and losses and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization and
the related restructuring of our business were reported separately as reorganization items in our
statement of operations. Our balance sheet prior to February 1, 2008 distinguished pre-petition
liabilities subject to compromise both from those pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to
compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that were affected by the plan of
reorganization were reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court. In
addition, cash provided by or used for reorganization items was disclosed separately in our
statement of cash flows. See Note 3 for further information about our financial statement
presentation under SOP 90-7.
8
Estimates These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP,
which require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Some of the more significant
estimates include: valuation of deferred tax assets and inventories; restructuring, environmental,
product liability, asbestos and warranty accruals; valuation of post-employment and postretirement
benefits; valuation, depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets; valuation of goodwill; and
allowances for doubtful accounts. We believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable and
appropriate. However, due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could
differ from those estimates.
As discussed above, in connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting, our assets were
valued at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141). In addition, our liabilities were adjusted to fair value or
present value where appropriate. Deferred taxes are determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109).
Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is generally
determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis for U.S. inventories, and on the average or
first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost basis for most non-U.S. inventories. In connection with our
adoption of fresh start accounting on February 1, 2008, inventories were increased by $169,
including the elimination of the U.S. LIFO reserve of $120. Of this increase, $15 related to FIFO
basis inventory outside of the U.S. The $15 was amortized to cost of sales as the inventory was
sold, negatively impacting gross margin, primarily in the first quarter with a nominal amount in
the second quarter.
Property, Plant and Equipment As a result of our adoption of fresh start accounting on
February 1, 2008, property, plant and equipment have been stated at fair value (see Note 2) with
useful lives ranging from two to thirty years. Depreciation is recognized over the estimated useful
lives using primarily the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and accelerated
depreciation methods for federal income tax purposes. Prior to the Effective Date, property, plant
and equipment of Prior Dana was recorded at cost. If assets are impaired their value is reduced by
an increase in the depreciation reserve.
Long-term Assets and Liabilities As required by SFAS 141, in connection with the
application of fresh start accounting we discounted our asbestos and workers compensation
liabilities and the related amounts recoverable from the insurers. We discounted the projected
cash flows using a risk-free rate of 4.0%, which we interpolated for the applicable period using
U.S. Treasury rates. Use of a risk free rate was considered appropriate given that other risks
affecting the volume and timing of payments had been considered in developing the
probability-weighted projected cash flows.
Intangible Assets SFAS 141 requires intangible assets to be recorded separately from
goodwill if they meet certain criteria. Intangible assets valued in connection with fresh start
accounting include customer contracts, developed technology and trademarks and trade names.
Customer contracts and developed technology have finite lives while substantially all of the
trademarks and trade names have indefinite lives. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized
over their useful life using the straight-line method of amortization and are periodically reviewed
for impairment indicators. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually
or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. Historically we carried nominal values for
acquired patent and trademark intangibles at cost. See Notes 2 and 7 for more information about
intangible assets.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the reorganization value of Dana over the fair
value of tangible and identified intangible assets. Goodwill is reviewed annually, and under
certain circumstances on an interim basis, to determine if any impairment has occurred. See Note 7
for more information about goodwill.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to
common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Prior Dana
shares were cancelled at emergence and shares in Dana were issued. Therefore the earnings per share
information for Dana is not comparable to Prior Dana earnings per share. See Note 9 for details of
the shares outstanding.
9
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires companies with
derivative instruments to disclose additional information that would enable financial statement
users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments
and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), and how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect a companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The new
requirements apply to derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments that are designated and
qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS 133. SFAS 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. Early application is encouraged. We have not yet determined the impact SFAS 161
will have on the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful
Life of Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 is
effective on January 1, 2009. We have not yet determined the impact FSP 142-3 will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements. SFAS 162 is effective
60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to
AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or an
Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF 07-5). EITF 07-5 provides that an
entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instruments contingent
exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies the impact of foreign currency denominated
strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF
07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing
the impact of EITF 07-5 on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-3, Accounting for Lessees for Maintenance
Deposits Under Lease Arrangements (EITF 08-3). EITF 08-3 provides guidance for accounting for
nonrefundable maintenance deposits. EITF 08-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are
currently assessing the impact of EITF 08-3 on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP 03-6-1).
FSP 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in paragraphs
60 and 61 of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. The FSP 03-6-1 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with all prior
period EPS data being adjusted retrospectively. Early adoption is not permitted. We have not yet
determined the impact of FSP 03-6-1 on our consolidated financial statements.
10
Note 2. Emergence from Chapter 11
Emergence from Reorganization Proceedings and Related Subsequent Events
Background Dana and forty of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors)
operated their businesses as debtors in possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code from the
Filing Date until emergence from Chapter 11 on January 31, 2008. The Debtors Chapter 11 cases
(collectively, the Bankruptcy Cases) were consolidated in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court) under the caption In re Dana Corporation,
et al., Case No. 06-10354 (BRL). Neither Dana Credit Corporation (DCC) and its subsidiaries nor any
of our non-U.S. affiliates were Debtors.
Claims resolution On December 26, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the
Confirmation Order) confirming the Plan and, on the Effective Date, the Plan was consummated and we
emerged from bankruptcy. As provided in the Plan and the Confirmation Order, we issued and
distributed approximately 70 million shares of Dana common stock (valued in reorganization at
$1,628) on the Effective Date to holders of allowed general unsecured claims in Class 5B totaling
approximately $2,050. Pursuant to the Plan, we also issued and set aside approximately 28 million
additional shares of Dana common stock (valued in reorganization at $640) for future distribution
to holders of allowed unsecured nonpriority claims in Class 5B under the Plan. These shares are
being distributed as the disputed and unliquidated claims are resolved. The claim amount related
to the 28 million shares for disputed and unliquidated claims was estimated not to exceed $700.
Since emergence and through the date of this filing, we have distributed an additional 8 million
shares for allowed claims (valued in reorganization at $182) increasing the total distribution to
$1,810 for unsecured claims of approximately $2,090. The corresponding decrease in the disputed
claims reserve leaves 20 million shares (valued in
reorganization at $458). The claim amount
related to the remaining shares for disputed and unliquidated claims is estimated to be
approximately $540. To the extent that these remaining claims are settled for less than $540,
additional incremental distributions will be made to the holders of the previously allowed general
unsecured claims in Class 5B. The terms and conditions governing these distributions are set forth
in the Plan and the Confirmation Order.
Under the provisions of the Plan, approximately two million shares of common stock (valued in
reorganization at $46) have been issued and distributed since the Effective Date to pay emergence
bonuses to union employees and non-union hourly and salaried non-management employees. The
original accrual of $47 on the Effective Date included approximately 60,000 shares (valued in
reorganization at $1) that will not be utilized for these bonuses. These shares will be
distributed instead to the holders of allowed general unsecured claims in Class 5B as provided in
the Plan.
Settlement obligations relating to non-pension retiree benefits and long-term disability (LTD)
benefits for union claimants and non-pension retiree benefits for non-union claimants were
satisfied with cash payments of $788 to non-Dana sponsored Voluntary Employee Benefit Associations
(VEBAs) established for the benefit of the respective claimant groups. Additionally, we paid DCC
$49, the remaining amount due to DCC noteholders, thereby settling DCCs general unsecured claim of
$325 against the Debtors. DCC, in turn, used these funds to repay the noteholders in full. Since
emergence, payments of $97 have been made for administrative claims, priority tax claims,
settlement pool claims and other classes of allowed claims of $212, with the remaining cash
payments of $115 expected to be made during the remainder of 2008.
Common Stock As discussed in Note 8, pursuant to the Plan, all of the issued and
outstanding shares of Prior Dana common stock, par value $1.00 per share, and any other outstanding
equity securities of Prior Dana, including all options and warrants, were cancelled on the
Effective Date, and we began the process of issuing 100 million shares of Dana common stock, par
value $0.01 per share.
Preferred Stock As discussed in Note 8, pursuant to the Plan, we also issued 2,500,000
shares of 4.0% Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the Series A Preferred), and
5,400,000 shares of 4.0% Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Series B
Preferred), on the Effective Date. See Note 8 for dividend and conversion terms and an explanation
of registration rights.
11
Financing at emergence As discussed in Note 14, we entered into an exit financing facility
(the Exit Facility) on the Effective Date. The Exit Facility consists of a Term Facility Credit and
Guaranty Agreement in the total aggregate amount of $1,430 (the Term Facility) and a $650 Revolving
Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the Revolving Facility). The Term Facility was fully drawn with
borrowings of $1,350 on the Effective Date and $80 on February 1, 2008. See Note 14 for the terms
and conditions of these facilities and the availability of additional borrowing.
Fresh Start Accounting As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP), we adopted fresh start accounting effective February 1, 2008 following the
guidance of SOP 90-7. The financial statements for the periods ended prior to January 31, 2008 do
not include the effect of any changes in our capital structure or changes in the fair value of
assets and liabilities as a result of fresh start accounting.
The timing of the availability of funds from the Exit Facility resulted in a January 31, 2008
consummation of the Plan. We have selected February 1, 2008 for adoption of fresh start accounting.
In accordance with SOP 90-7, the results of operations of Dana for January 2008 include charges of
$21 incurred during the month of January plus one-time reorganization costs incurred at emergence
of $104 offset by a pre-emergence gain of $27 resulting from the discharge of liabilities under the
Plan. In addition, we recorded a credit to earnings of $1,009 ($831 after tax) resulting from the
aggregate changes to the net carrying value of our pre-emergence assets and liabilities to record
their fair values under fresh start accounting.
SOP 90-7 provides, among other things, for a determination of the value to be assigned to the
equity of the emerging company as of a date selected for financial reporting purposes. Danas
compromise total enterprise value is $3,563. This value represents the amount of resources
available for the satisfaction of post-petition liabilities and allowed claims, as negotiated
between the Debtors and their creditors. This value, along with other terms of the Plan, was
determined only after extensive arms-length negotiations with the claimholders. Dana developed its
view of what the value should be based upon expected future cash flows of the business after
emergence from Chapter 11, discounted at rates reflecting perceived business and financial risks
(the discounted cash flows). This valuation and a valuation using market value multiples for peer
companies were blended to arrive at the compromise valuation. This value is the enterprise value of
the entity and, after adjusting for certain liabilities and debt as explained below and summarized
in explanatory note (5) to the reorganized consolidated balance sheet, is intended to approximate
the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets and liabilities of Dana immediately after
restructuring.
The basis for the discounted cash flows (DCF) was the projections published in the Plan.
These five-year estimates included projected changes associated with our reorganization
initiatives, anticipated changes in general market conditions, including variations in market
regions and known new business gains and losses, as well as other factors considered by Dana
management. We completed the DCF analysis by operating segment in late 2007 using discount rates
ranging from 10.5% to 11.5% based on a capital asset pricing model which utilized weighted average
cost of capital relative to certain ASG and HVSG reference group companies. The estimated
enterprise value and the resulting equity value were highly dependent on the achievement of the
future financial results contemplated in the projections that were published in the Plan. The
estimates and assumptions made in our valuation are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and there was no assurance that these results
could be achieved. The primary assumptions for which there is a reasonable possibility of the
occurrence of a variation that would have significantly affected the measurement value included the
revenue assumptions, anticipated levels of commodity costs, achievement of the cost reductions
outlined in our 2007 Form 10-K, the discount rate utilized, expected foreign exchange rates, the
demand for pick-up trucks and SUVs and the overall strength of the U.S. automotive markets. The
primary assumptions for conditions expected to be different from conditions in late 2007 were
stronger light vehicle and off-highway markets outside North America and a peak in demand for Class
8 trucks in North America in 2009 related to stricter U.S. emission standards that become effective
in 2010.
Based on conditions in the automotive industry and general economic conditions, we used the
low end of the range of valuations to determine the enterprise reorganization value.
12
For the DCF portion of the valuation, we utilized the average of two DCF methodologies to
derive the enterprise value of Dana:
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) Multiple Method
The sum of the present values of the unlevered free cash flows was added to the present
value of the terminal value of Dana, computed using EBITDA exit multiples by segment
ranging from 3.8 to 9.0 based in part on the range of multiples calculated in using a
comparable public company methodology, to arrive at an implied enterprise value for Danas
operating assets (excluding cash). |
|
|
|
|
Perpetuity Growth Method The sum of the present values of the unlevered free cash
flows was added to the present value of the terminal value of Dana, which was computed
using the perpetuity growth method based in part on industry growth prospects and our
business plans, to arrive at an implied enterprise value for Danas operating assets
(excluding cash). |
We also utilized a comparable companies methodology which identified a group of publicly
traded companies whose businesses and operating characteristics were similar to those of Dana as a
whole, or similar to significant portions of Danas operations, and evaluated various operating
metrics, growth characteristics and valuation multiples for equity and net debt for each of the
companies in the group. We then developed a range of valuation multiples to apply to our
projections to derive a range of implied enterprise values for Dana. The multiples ranged from 3.8
to 9.0 depending on the comparable company.
The final valuation range was an average of the DCF valuation ranges and the comparable
company multiples range. This amount was also adjusted for the fair value of unconsolidated
subsidiaries, the residual value of DCCs assets, the fair value of our net operating losses and a
note receivable obtained in connection with a divestiture in 2004.
Under fresh start accounting, this compromise total enterprise value was adjusted for Danas
available cash and was allocated to our assets based on their respective fair values in conformity
with the purchase method of accounting for business combinations in SFAS 141. Available cash was
determined by adjusting actual cash at emergence for emergence related cash activity expected to
occur after January 31, 2008. The valuations required to determine the fair value of certain of
Danas assets as presented below represent the results of valuation procedures we performed. The
enterprise reorganization value, after adjustments for available cash, is reduced by debt, minority
interest and preferred stock with the remainder representing the value to common shareholders.
The significant assumptions related to the valuations of our assets in connection with fresh
start accounting included the following:
Inventory The value of inventory for fresh start accounting was based on the following:
|
|
|
The fair value of finished goods was calculated as the estimated selling price of the
finished goods on hand, less the costs to dispose of that inventory (i.e., selling costs)
and a reasonable profit margin for the selling effort. |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of work in process was calculated as the selling price less the sum of
costs to complete the manufacturing process, selling costs and a reasonable profit on the
remaining manufacturing effort and the selling effort based on profits for similar
finished goods. |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of raw material inventory was its current replacement costs. |
Fixed Assets Except for specific fixed assets identified as held for sale, which were valued at
their estimated net realizable value, fixed assets were valued at fair value. In establishing fair
value, three approaches were utilized to ensure that all market conditions were considered:
|
|
|
The market or comparison sales approach uses recent sales or offerings of similar assets
currently on the market to arrive at a probable selling price. In applying this method,
aligning adjustments were made to reconcile differences between the comparable sale and the
appraised asset. |
13
|
|
|
The cost approach considers the amount required to construct or purchase a new asset of
equal utility, then adjusts the value in consideration of all forms of depreciation as of
the appraisal date as described below: |
|
|
|
Physical deterioration the loss in value or usefulness attributable solely
to physical causes such as wear and tear and exposure to the elements. |
|
|
|
|
Functional obsolescence a loss in value is due to factors inherent in the
property itself and due to changes in design or process resulting in inadequacy,
overcapacity, excess construction, lack of functional utility or excess operation
costs. |
|
|
|
|
Economic obsolescence loss in value by unfavorable external conditions such
as economics of the industry, loss of material and labor sources or change in
ordinances. |
|
|
|
The income approach considers value in relation to the present worth of future benefits
derived from ownership and is usually measured through the capitalization of a specific
level of income. |
Useful lives were assigned to applicable appraised assets based on estimates of economic
future usefulness in consideration of all forms of depreciation.
Intangible Assets The financial information used to determine the fair value of intangible assets
was consistent with the information used in estimating the enterprise value of Dana. Following is
a summary of each category considered in the valuation of intangible assets:
|
|
|
Core technology An income approach, the relief from royalty method, was used to value
developed technology at $99 as of January 31, 2008. Significant assumptions included
development of the forecasted revenue streams for each technology category by geographic
region, estimated royalty rates for each technology category, applicable tax rates by
geographic region and appropriate discount rates which considered variations among markets
and geographic regions. |
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and trade names Four trade names/trademarks were identified as intangible
assets: Dana®, Spicer®, Victor-Reinz® and Long®. An income approach, the relief from
royalty method, was used to value trademarks and trade names at $90 as of January 31, 2008.
Significant assumptions included the useful life, the forecasted revenue streams for
each trade name/trademark by geographic region, estimated applicable royalty rate for each
technology category, applicable tax rates by geographic region and appropriate discount
rates. For those indefinite lived trade names/trademarks (Dana® and Spicer®), terminal
growth rates were also estimated. |
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts and related relationships Customer contracts and related
relationships were valued by operating segment utilizing an income approach, the
multi-period excess earnings method, which resulted in a valuation of $491. Significant
assumptions included the forecasted revenue streams by customer by geographic region, the
estimated contract renewal probability for each operating segment, estimated profit margins
by customer by region, estimated charges for contributory assets for each customer (fixed
assets, net working capital, assembled workforce, trade names/trademarks and developed
technology), estimated tax rates by geographic region and appropriate discount rates. |
14
The adjustments presented below are to our January 31, 2008 balance sheet. The balance sheet
reorganization adjustments presented below summarize the impact of the Plan and the adoption of
fresh start accounting as of the Effective Date.
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
REORGANIZED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Fresh Start |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Dana |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
$ |
948 |
(2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
(6) |
|
|
1,256 |
|
Other |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
)(6) |
|
|
315 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
(6) |
|
|
1,012 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
)(6) |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
)(6) |
|
|
302 |
(5) |
Intangibles |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
(6) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
40 |
(2) |
|
|
(35 |
)(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
)(3) |
|
|
(35 |
)(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
(6) |
|
|
181 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
(6) |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,322 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
8,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
DANA HOLDING CORPORATION
REORGANIZED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Prior |
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Fresh Start |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
Adjustments(1) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Dana |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, including current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debtor-in-possession financing |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(900 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
(6) |
|
|
268 |
|
Taxes on income including current deferred |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities (incuding VEBA paid on February 1) |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
815 |
(3) |
|
|
21 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
(3,327 |
)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred employee benefits and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
)(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Term loan facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
(6) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
(2,209 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
Series B preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
Common stock successor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
(3)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital successor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267 |
(3)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
Common stock predecessor |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(150 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital predecessor |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(202 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
27 |
(3) |
|
|
831 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
)(3) |
|
|
(591 |
)(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
278 |
(3) |
|
|
591 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
)(3) |
|
|
(140 |
)(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
6,322 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
8,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory Notes
(1) |
|
Represents amounts recorded on the Effective Date for the implementation of the Plan,
including the settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and related payments, the
issuance of new debt and repayment of old debt, distributions of cash and new shares of
common and preferred stock, and the cancellation of Prior Dana common and preferred stock. |
16
(2) |
|
Cash proceeds at emergence (net of cash payments): |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount borrowed under the Exit Facility |
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
Original issue discount (OID) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
Exit Facility, net of OID ($15 current, $1,221 to long-term debt) |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: deferred issuance fees |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
Exit Facility net proceeds |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issuance, net of fees and expenses Series A |
|
|
242 |
|
Preferred stock issuance, net of fees and expenses Series B |
|
|
529 |
|
Repayment of DIP lending facility |
|
|
(900 |
) |
Non-union retiree VEBA obligation payment |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Fees paid at emergence (including $10 previously accrued) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Payment to DCC bondholders |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
Net cash |
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
This entry records our exit financing, the issuance of new Series A and Series B Preferred
Stock and the payment of certain bankruptcy obligations on January 31, 2008. An additional
$80 of the term loan portion of the Exit Facility was borrowed by Dana on February 1, 2008
and is not included in the January balance sheet above. Debt issuance costs of $40 are
recorded in Investments and other assets and OID of $114 is presented net with the debt
balance. Both of these are deferred and amortized over the term of the facility. The $790 of
preferred stock is recorded at the net proceeds of $771.
(3) |
|
Retirement of Liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC): |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise |
|
$ |
3,382 |
|
APBO reduction charged to LSTC and credited to Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Non-union retiree VEBA obligation payment |
|
|
(55 |
) |
New common stock and paid-in capital issued to satisfy allowed and disputed
claims |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
Claims to be satisfied in cash transferred to Other accrued liabilities at
January 31, 2008 (includes $733 union VEBA obligation paid on February 1) |
|
|
(815 |
) |
Prior service credits recognized (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
Gain on settlement of Liabilities subject to compromise |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets not realizable due to emergence |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
Reorganization costs accrued at emergence (includes $47 of emergence
bonuses) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
Total reorganization costs incurred at emergence (See Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements) |
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
This entry records reorganization costs of $104 incurred as a result of emergence and a gain
of $27 on extinguishment of the obligations pursuant to implementation of the Plan.
Other accrued liabilities include a $733 liability to the union VEBAs. On February 1, 2008,
Dana paid this obligation and borrowed the remaining $80 of the term loan commitment in (2)
above. Payments after January 31, under the terms of the Plan, will include approximately
$212 of administrative claims, priority tax claims and other classes of allowed claims, and
are also included in Other accrued liabilities of Dana at January 31, 2008.
(4) |
|
Closes Prior Dana capital stock and paid-in capital to accumulated deficit. |
17
(5) |
|
Reconciliation of enterprise value to the reorganization value of Dana assets,
determination of goodwill and allocation of compromise enterprise value to common
stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
Compromise total enterprise value |
|
$ |
3,563 |
|
Plus: cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,147 |
|
Less: adjustments to cash assumptions used in valuation and emergence related
cash payments after January 31, 2008 |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
Plus: liabilities (excluding debt and liability for emergence bonuses) |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization value of Dana assets |
|
|
8,275 |
|
Fair value of Dana assets (excluding goodwill) |
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization value of Dana assets in excess of fair value (goodwill) |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization value of Dana assets |
|
$ |
8,275 |
|
Less: liabilities (excluding debt and the liability for emergence bonuses) |
|
|
(3,694 |
) |
Less: debt |
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
Less: minority interest |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Less: preferred stock (net of issuance costs) |
|
|
(771 |
) |
Less: liability for emergence bonus shares not issued at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
New common stock ($1) and paid-in capital ($2,267) |
|
$ |
2,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
97,971,791 |
|
Per share value |
|
$ |
23.15 |
|
The per share value of $23.15 was utilized to record the shares issued for allowed claims,
the shares issued for the disputed claims reserve and the liability for shares issued to
employees subsequent to January 31, 2008 as emergence bonuses.
The $1,129 in the caption Adjustments to cash assumptions used in valuation and
emergence-related cash payments in the table above represents adjustments to cash on hand
for amounts expected to be paid for bankruptcy claims and fees after emergence of $962 (VEBA
payment ($733), remaining administrative claims, priority tax claims, settlement pool claims
and other classes of allowed claims ($212) and settlements (cures) for contract rejections
($17)). In addition, consistent with assumptions made in the valuation of enterprise value,
available cash was reduced by $56 for DCC settlements and $111 for cash deposits which
support letters of credit, a number of self-insured programs and lease obligations, all of
which were deemed to be unavailable to Dana.
The following table summarizes the allocation of fair values of the assets and liabilities
at the date of emergence as shown in the reorganized consolidated balance sheet as of
January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
2,678 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
302 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
680 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
246 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
181 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current liabilities (including notes payable and current portion
of long-term debt) |
|
|
(3,016 |
) |
Less: long-term debt |
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
Less: long-term liabilities and minority interests |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities acquired |
|
|
(5,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
18
(6) |
|
This entry records the adjustments for fresh start accounting including the write-up of
inventory and the adjustment of property, plant and equipment to its appraised value. Fresh
start adjustments for intangible assets are also included and are based on valuations
discussed above. |
|
|
|
The adjustments required to report assets and liabilities at fair value under fresh start
accounting resulted in a pre-tax adjustment of $1,009, which was reported as Fresh start
accounting adjustments in the consolidated statement of operations for January 2008. Income
tax expense for January included $178 of tax expense related to these adjustments, reducing
to $831 the impact of fair value adjustments on net income for the month and on the
accumulated deficit at January 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
The $29 reduction in Deferred employee benefits and other non-current liabilities resulted
from adjustments to the asbestos liability, discounting of workers compensation liabilities
and reductions in certain tax liabilities. |
|
|
|
The fresh start adjustment to Other accrued liabilities included realignment-related exit
costs of $32 consisting of $10 of projected maintenance, security and taxes on assets held
for sale, $9 of costs to be incurred in preparing these assets for sale and $13 of
obligations under lease contracts related to facilities and equipment that were in use at
January 31, 2008 but will cease operations in 2008 as part of restructuring plans approved
prior to Danas emergence from bankruptcy. Charges to liability accounts, primarily to
write off deferred revenue, reduced the total fresh start adjustment to other accrued
liabilities to $21. |
|
(7) |
|
Charge to Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the remeasurement of retained
employee benefit plans. (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of pension plan net assets |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
Increase in Deferred employee benefits and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
Charge to Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
(8) |
|
Adjusts Accumulated other comprehensive loss to zero. |
Note 3. Reorganization Proceedings
The Bankruptcy Cases were jointly administered, and the Debtors managed their businesses as
debtors in possession subject to the supervision of the Bankruptcy Court. We continued normal
business operations during the bankruptcy process and emerged from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008.
See Note 2 for an explanation of the distributions under the Plan. Except as specifically
provided in the Plan, the distributions under the Plan were in complete satisfaction, discharge and
release of, all claims and third-party ownership interests in the Debtors arising on or before the
Effective Date, including any interest accrued on such claims from and after the Filing Date.
DCC Notes
DCC is a U.S. subsidiary of Dana but was not part of the bankruptcy. At the time of the
bankruptcy filing, DCC had outstanding notes totaling approximately $399. DCC sold substantially
all of its asset portfolio and used the proceeds to pay down the DCC notes to a balance of $49 as
of the Effective Date. Dana and DCC had executed a settlement agreement whereby they agreed to the
discontinuance of a tax sharing agreement between them and to a stipulated amount of a general
unsecured claim owed by Prior Dana to DCC of $325 (the DCC Claim). On the Effective Date and
pursuant to the Plan, Dana paid DCC $49, the remaining amount due to DCC noteholders, thereby
settling DCCs general unsecured claim of $325 against the Debtors. DCC, in turn, used these funds
to repay the noteholders in full.
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
As required by SOP 90-7, liabilities that were being addressed through the bankruptcy process
(i.e., general unsecured nonpriority claims) were reported as Liabilities subject to compromise and
adjusted to the allowed claim amount as determined through the bankruptcy process, or to the
estimated claim amount if determined to be probable and estimable in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Certain of these claims were resolved and satisfied on or before
our emergence on January 31, 2008, while others have been or will be resolved subsequent to
emergence. Although the allowed amount of certain disputed claims has not yet been determined, our
liability associated with these
19
disputed claims has been discharged upon our emergence. Except for
certain specific priority claims (see Note 2), most of the allowed unsecured nonpriority claims in
Class 5B will be satisfied by distributions from the previously funded reserve holding shares of
Dana common stock. Therefore, the future resolution of claims subject to the reserve will not have
an impact on our post-emergence results of operations or financial condition. To the extent that
disputed and unliquidated claims are settled for less than the $540 currently estimated, additional
distributions will be made to holders of allowed unsecured nonpriority claims.
Liabilities subject to compromise in the consolidated balance sheet include those of our
discontinued operations and consisted of the following at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
285 |
|
Pension and other postretirement obligations |
|
|
1,034 |
|
Debt (including accrued interest of $39) |
|
|
1,621 |
|
Other |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise |
|
$ |
3,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
On the Effective Date, the Plan required that certain liabilities previously reported as
Liabilities subject to compromise be retained by Dana. At December 31, 2007, we reclassified
approximately $213 of liabilities, including $145 of asbestos liabilities, $27 of pension
liabilities and $41 of other liabilities from Liabilities subject to compromise to current or
long-term liabilities of Dana, as appropriate. Liabilities subject to compromise declined further,
by $128, in January 2008 as a result of the retention of additional liabilities including $111 of
priority tax claim liabilities, $9 of other tax liabilities and $8 of other liabilities. The
remaining liabilities subject to compromise were discharged at January 31, 2008 or were retained by
us under the terms of the Plan.
Reorganization Items
Professional advisory fees and other costs directly associated with our reorganization were
reported separately as reorganization items pursuant to SOP 90-7. Post-emergence professional fees
relate to claim settlements, plan implementation and other transition costs attributable to the
reorganization. Reorganization items also include provisions and adjustments to reflect the
carrying value of certain pre-petition liabilities at their estimated allowable claim amounts, as
well as the costs incurred by the non-Debtor companies as a result of the Debtors bankruptcy
proceedings.
20
The reorganization items in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Professional fees |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Contract rejections and claim
settlements prior to emergence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Employee emergence bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax costs due to reorganization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reorganization items |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of liabilities
subject to compromise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
items, net |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items for the one month ended January 31, 2008 include costs incurred during
the month and items recorded at emergence from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2008 Reorganization Items |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
January 1 to |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
January 1 |
|
|
|
January 31 |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Upon |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Emergence |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Employee emergence bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Foreign tax costs due to reorganization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reorganization items |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Gain on settlement of liabilities
subject to compromise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Prior Dana reorganization items |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise results from the satisfaction of
these liabilities at emergence through issuance of Dana common stock or cash payments, as described
in Note 2. We incurred professional fees of $22 during January 2008 and we incurred additional
reorganization expenses of approximately $104 upon emergence from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008.
Included in the reorganization cost incurred upon emergence is an accrual of $47 for stock bonuses
for certain union and non-union employees. Other one-time expenses associated with emergence
included transfer taxes and other tax charges to effectuate the emergence and new legal
organization, success fee obligations to certain professional advisors and other parties
contributing to the bankruptcy reorganization and other costs relating directly to emergence.
21
Note 4. Asset Impairments and Divestitures
Asset Impairments
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), we review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation
in which the assets are utilized to their carrying amount. If those cash flows are determined to be
less than the carrying amount of the assets, the long-lived assets of the operation (excluding
goodwill) are written down to fair value if the fair value is lower than the carrying amount. Fair
value is determined based on discounted cash flows or other methods providing best estimates of
value.
Asset impairments often result from significant actions like the discontinuance of customer
programs, facility closures or other events which result in the assets being held for sale. When
this occurs, the specific assets are adjusted to their fair value less cost to sell or dispose if
that amount is less than the current book value.
Long-lived assets that continue to be used internally are evaluated for impairment, in the
aggregate, by business segment given the global nature of the business segment operation, the
interdependency of operations within the segment and the ability to reallocate assets within the
segment.
With
our adoption of fresh start accounting upon emergence, assets were revalued to new
carrying values based on our enterprise reorganization value and, in some cases, the appraised
values of long-lived assets are higher than their previous net book value. These increased
valuations for fresh start accounting purposes subject us to greater risks of future impairment.
Our ASG operating segments are being significantly impacted by reduced North American customer
production schedules, potentially longer-term structural reductions in market demand for light
pick-ups and SUVs that have been important vehicle platforms for us and higher steel costs. As a
result, our earnings outlook for these businesses has declined and we recorded a goodwill
impairment in the Driveshaft segment (See Note 7). We also evaluated
the long-lived assets in certain of these businesses for impairment at June 30, 2008 given the reduced level of expected sales, profits
and cash flows. Based on this assessment, we determined that there was no impairment.
Divestitures
In 2005, the Board of Directors of Prior Dana approved the divestiture of our engine hard
parts, fluid products and pump products operations and we have reported these businesses as
discontinued operations through the dates of divestiture. The divestiture of these discontinued
operations, with the exception of the pump products business, was completed during 2007. In the
first quarter of 2008, we completed the sale of the remaining assets of the pump products business
to Melling Tool Company, generating proceeds of $5 and an after-tax loss of $1 that was recorded in
January 2008.
With the sale of the remaining assets of the pump products business in January 2008, we have
completed the disposal of the businesses initially classified as discontinued operations in the
fourth quarter of 2005.
During January 2008, we recorded an expense of $5 in discontinued operations associated with a
post-closing adjustment relating to the sale of the engine products business. The adjustment
reinstated certain retained liabilities. In the second quarter of 2008, we settled the final
purchase price adjustment related to the sale of our coupled products business with no impact on
our results. We also recorded, as an expense in discontinued operations, additional post-closing
purchase price adjustments of $2 in the second quarter of 2008 related to the sale of our engine
hard parts and pump products businesses.
Note 5. Discontinued Operations
The results of operations of the engine hard parts, fluid products and pump products
businesses are aggregated and presented as discontinued operations through their respective dates
of divestiture. The sales of these businesses were substantially completed during 2007.
22
The results of the discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Realignment and other expense, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realignment and other expense, net in the three months ended June 30, 2008 reflects
post-closing purchase price adjustments. Other expense in January of 2008 includes the pre-tax
loss of $1 on the sale of the remaining pump products business and a post-closing adjustment of $5
related to the sale of the engine hard parts business in the prior year. For the three months ended
June 30, 2007, realignment and other expense, net included a charge of $17 for settlement of
pension obligations in the U.K. (see Note 11) relating to discontinued operations and a charge of
$9 for estimated bankruptcy claim settlements.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of $26 during the first quarter of 2007 related to the sale of the
engine hard parts business.
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations reported in the consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2007 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
13 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
5 |
|
Cash and other assets |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
1 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
There were no assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of June 30, 2008.
In the consolidated statement of cash flows, the cash flows of discontinued operations are
reported in the respective categories of cash flows, along with those of our continuing operations.
Note 6. Realignment of Operations
Realignment of our manufacturing operations was an essential component of our bankruptcy
reorganization plans. We focused on eliminating excess capacity, closing and consolidating
facilities and repositioning operations in lower cost facilities or those with excess capacity and
on reducing and realigning overhead costs.
23
In January 2008, we announced the closure of our Barrie, Ontario Commercial Vehicle facility,
and in June 2008, we announced the closure of our Light Axle foundry in Venezuela. The
realignment costs recorded in 2008 relate primarily to these two closures and costs associated with
the completion of two other previously announced closures and work force reduction initiatives.
In connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting, the facilities then expected to be
closed in 2008 were treated as closures of acquired facilities in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 95-3 and $32 was recorded at emergence for additional
closure-related obligations.
The following tables show the realignment charges and related payments including the amounts
accrued in January 2008 under fresh start accounting recorded in our continuing operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-Lived |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Exit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Activity during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to realignment |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Exit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
Activity during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to realignment |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Fresh start adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Non-cash write-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Activity during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to realignment |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Non-cash write-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, $87 of realignment accruals remained in other accrued liabilities, including
$68 for the reduction of approximately 1,900 employees to be completed by the end of 2009 and $19
for lease terminations and other exit costs. The estimated cash expenditures related to these
liabilities are projected to approximate $57 in 2008 and $30 thereafter.
Realignment
initiatives are generally completed over multiple reporting periods. In addition to the
$87 accrued at June 30, 2008, we estimate that another $41 will be expensed in the future to
complete pending initiatives. The following table provides project-to-date and estimated future
expenses for completion of our pending realignment initiatives for the Automotive Systems Group
(ASG) and the Heavy Vehicle Systems Group (HVSG) business units and the underlying segments.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Recognized |
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost to |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
to Date |
|
|
Complete |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axle |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Structures |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
OTHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total continuing operations |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, and more frequently if indicators of
potential impairment exist, using a fair-value based approach. The valuation for impairment is
generally based on valuation models that incorporate internal projections of expected future cash
flows and operating plans. The annual impairment tests are performed as of October 31.
SFAS 142 requires that the impairment test be performed through the application of a two-step
fair value test. The first step of the test compares the book value
of our reporting units, which are our operating segments, to their
estimated fair values at the respective test dates. The estimated fair values of the reporting
units are computed using the present value of estimated future cash flows. If fair value is less
than carrying value, a second step must be performed to quantify the amount of the impairment, if
any. The second step of the impairment test
compares the fair value of these assets to their book values. The implied
fair value of goodwill is calculated as the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit being tested over the fair value of the tangible assets and liabilities as well as existing
recorded and unrecorded identifiable intangible assets. The estimated implied fair value of
goodwill is compared to its respective carrying value and any excess carrying value is recorded as an impairment charge.
The Driveshaft segment in ASG was tested for impairment in the second quarter of
2008 due to adverse conditions in the automotive market. Lower production volumes and higher costs contributed to lower than expected operating profits and cash flows for
this business. Based on the significant cuts to production schedules of major U.S. customers and
the declining sales of the pick-up truck and SUV platforms on which we have significant driveshaft
content, our earnings outlook for this business has declined.
Based on our revised outlook, the fair value of the Driveshaft segment, as determined using
the estimated present value of future cash flows, did not support the recorded goodwill.
Accordingly, our second quarter 2008 results include a goodwill impairment charge of $75 to write
down the goodwill in this segment. We used the same assumptions and
methodologies as described in Note 2 to determine the fair value of the segments tangible and intangible assets.
25
The following table summarizes the components of goodwill by operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Start |
|
|
of |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Driveshaft |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermal |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 109, we have included in the Effect of Currency and Other in the table
above, an increase in goodwill of $11 for the accrual of tax liabilities identified in the second
quarter but related to tax uncertainties that existed at the date of emergence. Goodwill
was also increased by $3, the
net effect of items adjusted in our balance sheet during the second quarter which should have been included in the
goodwill amount recorded at emergence. These out of period
adjustments made during the second quarter of 2008 are not considered material to prior periods or
the current period.
Other Intangible Assets
In connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting, certain intangible assets including
core technology, trademarks and trade names and customer
relationships were recorded at their estimated fair value on January
31, 2008. Core technology includes the proprietary know-how and expertise that is
inherent in our products and manufacturing processes. Trademarks and trade names include our trade
names related to product lines and the related trademarks including Dana ®, Spicer
® and others. Customer relationships include the established relationships with our customers
and the related ability of these customers to continue to generate future recurring revenue and
income. See Note 2 regarding the valuation of these intangible assets.
Except for certain trademarks and trade names, our intangible assets are subject to
amortization. The amortizable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method
over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from one to seventeen years. We evaluate the
recoverability of intangible assets periodically and take into account remaining useful lives and
events or circumstances that are impairment indicators.
Due to the impairment indicators for our Driveshaft segment noted above, we performed
impairment testing on this segments non-amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2008. We
determined that the fair value of these intangible assets had declined by $7, resulting in an
impairment charge recorded in Impairment of intangible assets. We used the same assumptions and
methodologies as described in Note 2 to determine the fair value of
these intangible assets.
26
The following table summarizes the components of other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
(years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core technology |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
95 |
|
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets |
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2007, primarily trademarks, were less than $1.
The net carrying amounts of intangible assets attributable to each of our operating segments
at June 30, 2008 were as follows: Light Axle, $15; Driveshaft
$222; Sealing $51; Thermal $24;
Structures $59; Commercial Vehicle $51; and Off-Highway $227.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $38 in the five months ended June 30,
2008. Amortization of core technology of $7 was charged to cost of sales and $31 of amortization of
trademarks and trade names and customer relationships was charged to amortization of intangibles.
Estimated aggregate pre-tax amortization expense related to intangible assets for the
remainder of 2008 and each of the next five succeeding fiscal years is as follows: 2008, $45;
2009, $90; 2010, $90; 2011, $89; 2012, $89 and 2013, $88. Actual amounts may differ from these
estimates due to such factors as currency translation, customer turnover, impairments, additional
intangible asset acquisitions and other events.
Note 8. Capital Stock
Prior Dana Preferred Stock
Prior Dana had 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, without par value, including
1,000,000 shares reserved for issuance under a Rights Agreement. No shares of Prior Dana preferred
stock were issued. The share authorization and reservation were cancelled on the Effective Date.
Series A and Series B Preferred Stock
Issuance Pursuant to the Plan, we issued 2.5 million shares of our Series A Preferred and
5.4 million shares of our Series B Preferred on the Effective Date. The Series A Preferred was sold
to Centerbridge Partners, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (Centerbridge) for $250, less a
commitment fee of $3 and expense reimbursement of $5, resulting in net proceeds of $242. The Series
B Preferred was sold to certain qualified investors (as described in the Plan) for $540, less a
commitment fee of $11, resulting in net proceeds of $529.
Conversion Rights In accordance with the terms of the preferred stock, all of the shares of
preferred stock are, at the holders option, convertible into a number of fully paid and
non-assessable shares of common stock at an initial price of $13.19. This initial conversion price
is subject to certain adjustments as set forth in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
Shares of Series A Preferred having an aggregate liquidation preference of not more than $125
and the Series B Preferred are convertible at any time at the option of the applicable holder after
July 31, 2008. The remaining shares of Series A Preferred are convertible after January 31, 2011.
In addition, we
27
will be able to cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the
preferred stock, if the common stocks per share closing price exceeds $22.24 for at least 20
consecutive trading days beginning on or after January 31, 2013. This price is subject to
adjustment in certain customary circumstances, including as a result of stock splits and
combinations, dividends and distributions and certain issuances of common stock or common stock
derivatives.
Dividends on the preferred stock have been accrued from the issue date at a rate of 4% per
annum and are payable in cash on a quarterly basis as approved by the Board of Directors. The Board
approved the payment of a dividend of $1.33 per share for the four-month period from February 1,
2008 through May 31, 2008 to holders of Series A and Series B Preferred. The dividends were funded
at the end of May 2008 and were paid on June 2, 2008 to preferred shareholders of record at the
close of business on May 23, 2008. In July, the Board authorized the payment of a cash dividend of
$1.00 per share to holders of Series A and Series B Preferred for the period from June 1, 2008
through August 31, 2008, payable on September 2, 2008 to preferred shareholders of record at the
close of business on August 1, 2008.
If at any time we fail to pay the equivalent of six quarterly dividends on the preferred
stock, the holders of the preferred stock, voting separately as a single class, will be entitled to
elect two additional directors to our Board of Directors. However, so long as Centerbridge owns
Series A Preferred having an aggregate liquidation preference of at least $125, this provision will
not be applicable.
New Common Stock
On the Effective Date, we began the process of issuing 100 million shares of Dana common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, including approximately 71 million shares for allowed unsecured
nonpriority claims, approximately 27 million additional shares deposited to a reserve for disputed
unsecured nonpriority claims in Class 5B under the Plan and approximately two million shares to pay
bonuses to union employees and non-union hourly and salaried non-management employees. We relied,
based on the Confirmation Order, on Section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code to exempt us from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act for the offer and sale of the common stock to the
general unsecured creditors. We filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with respect to the
common stock issued for the post-emergence bonuses to non-union hourly and salaried non-management
employees and we have substantially completed the issuance of these shares. The charge to
reorganization items, net, of $47 for these bonuses was accrued to other accrued liabilities as of
the Effective Date.
Note 9. Earnings Per Share
The calculation of basic earnings per share utilized 100 million shares of common stock for
the three and five months ended June 30, 2008. The initial issuance on emergence of 98 million
shares of common stock was increased by the 2 million shares of common stock committed to certain
union and non-union employees but not distributed until the second and third quarters of 2008.
The share count for diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effects of the assumed
exercise of stock options and the assumed vesting of restricted stock unit awards as well as the
assumed conversion of preferred stock. However, since these instruments are anti-dilutive, they
are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and five months
ended June 30, 2008, we excluded 2 million and 1 million common equivalent shares related to
options from the computation of earnings per share due to
their anti-dilutive effect. Stock options and restricted stock units issued during 2008 had a
nominal impact on the weighted average shares outstanding as a substantial portion of the stock
options carried a strike price above the average price of the stock. Conversion of the preferred
stock was also not included in the share count for diluted earnings per share as it was
anti-dilutive. The preferred stock would convert into approximately 60 million shares of common
stock at a $13.19 conversion price.
Income available to common stockholders is reduced by preferred dividends.
Earnings per share information reported by Prior Dana is not comparable to earnings per share
information reported by Dana because all existing equity interests of Prior Dana were eliminated
upon the consummation of the Plan.
28
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, in addition to average shares of common
stock outstanding of 150 million, there were one million shares that satisfied the definition of
potentially dilutive shares. These potentially dilutive shares have been excluded from the
computation of earnings per share as the loss from continuing operations for these periods caused
the shares to have an anti-dilutive effect. In addition, we excluded 12 million shares of common
stock for each of these periods from the computation of earnings per share as these shares
represented stock options with exercise prices higher than the average per share trading price of
our stock during the respective periods and the effect of including them would also be
anti-dilutive.
Note 10. Incentive and Stock Compensation
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan
Five employees participated in the Executive Incentive Compensation (EIC) Plan during 2007,
earning $4 which was recognized as compensation expense in 2007. The EIC Plan specified that a
portion of each participants bonus, depending on the amount earned, could be paid in common stock
of the reorganized Dana. Four of the five employees earned amounts in 2007 that required payment
of a portion of the award in the form of common stock. The number of shares was determined based
on the average closing price of the stock for the 20 trading days following the filing of Danas
2007 Form 10-K, resulting in 73,562 shares of common stock being issued in April 2008 at a value of
$9.86 per share.
2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
Our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan is designed to attract and retain key talent and to motivate
and provide to such persons incentives and rewards for improving the financial and operational
performance of our businesses. For a discussion of the terms and performance measures of the 2008
Omnibus Incentive Plan, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II
of our 2007 Form 10-K.
During the second quarter of 2008, we granted 4,545 restricted stock units and options to
purchase 1,107,681 shares of common stock under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The value of the
restricted stock units based on the market price of our common stock at grant date was $8.80. The
weighted-average fair value at grant date for the employee options was $4.42. Compensation expense
is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting periods.
In May 2008, we issued 26,753 shares of Dana common stock to a new Executive Officer. Based
on the closing price of the stock at issuance, compensation cost of less than $1 was expensed upon
issuance.
In April 2008, we granted options to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock to external
consultants under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These options vest ratably over two years and
expire after five years. Expense for these awards is measured based on the market price of the
stock at
the end of each quarter and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period with an
offset to Other accrued liabilities.
Our non-management directors can elect to defer payment of their retainers and fees for Board
and Committee service in the form of restricted stock units. The number of restricted stock units
granted is based on the amount deferred and the market price of our common stock. On June 30,
2008, 4,380 restricted stock units had been granted in lieu of fees.
At June 30, 2008, there were 10,852,141 shares available for future grants of options and
other types of awards under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
2008 Long Term Incentive Program
Our Board approved the 2008 Long Term Incentive Program (2008 LTIP) during the second quarter
of 2008 based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
2008 LTIP was implemented pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Following are the key terms of the 2008 LTIP.
29
Employees designated by Dana, including our named executive officers, participate in the 2008
LTIP. For certain participants, including executive officers, a targeted grant amount was
calculated by dividing a predetermined percentage of annual base pay by the stock price at the date
of grant. A second set of participants were grouped into two levels of management and a total
targeted grant amount was established for each of the two groups. The 2008 LTIP provides for three
different mixes of long-term incentives. Certain executives, including the named executive
officers, are eligible for awards consisting of 50% stock options and 50% performance shares. A
second group of employees is eligible for awards consisting of 50% performance shares and 50%
restricted stock units. A third group of key employees is eligible for restricted stock unit awards
from a discretionary pool.
Stock option awards under the 2008 LTIP vest ratably over three years and expire after ten
years. The restricted stock unit awards cliff vest fully after three years and will be settled in
shares of Dana common stock, except for certain non-U.S. employees who will receive cash.
With respect to performance share awards, payout is based on achieving financial targets
related to EBITDA (34% weighted), free cash flow (as defined) (33% weighted) and return on invested
capital (as defined) (33% weighted). A specified level of EBITDA must be achieved by Dana in order
for any performance share award to be earned. Dana has set for each participant a number of
notional shares payable at threshold, target and maximum. Awards for executive officers, including
the named executive officers, are based on a range of 50% of the target performance award
(threshold) to 250% of the target performance award (maximum). Each participant has received
notional shares equal to the number of shares of Dana common stock that would be payable at the
target.
For 2008 performance share awards, there are three distinct performance periods. The first
period covers the 2008 calendar year and accounts for 25% of the target award. The second period
covers the two-year period 2008 through 2009 and accounts for another 25% of the target award. The
final period covers the three-year period 2008 through 2010 and accounts for the remaining 50% of
the target award. Award payouts will be made in shares of Dana common stock except for certain
non-U.S. employees who will be paid in cash.
During the second quarter of 2008, we granted options to purchase 1,243,560 shares of common
stock, 827,874 notional shares for performance share awards, and 283,000 restricted stock units to
employees under the 2008 LTIP. The weighted-average fair value per option at the grant dates was
$4.52. The values of the performance shares and the restricted stock units (granted under LTIP),
based on the market price of our stock on the dates of grant, were $10.19 and $10.00.
Summary of Stock Options
The exercise price of each option we award under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan equals the
closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. An options maximum term is ten
years. Shares issued upon the exercise of options are recorded as Common stock and Additional
paid-in capital at the option price.
We calculated a fair value for each option at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes
valuation model. We believe the Black-Scholes model is appropriate for situations in which
historical exercise data is not available. The weighted average key assumptions used in the model
for various options granted during the five months ended June 30, 2008 are summarized in the
following table. We used the simplified method to calculate the expected term, which represents
the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The simplified method is
as described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins Nos. 107 and 110. This method is appropriate because
we have insufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate
expected term due to the limited period of time our new common stock has been publicly traded. The
risk-free rate for each period within the contractual life of the option is based on that periods
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero
since there are no current plans to pay common stock dividends. The volatility assumption was
based on a benchmark study of our peers.
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
|
Assumptions |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
5.95 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40.63 |
% |
The following table summarizes all of the stock option activity during the five months ended
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,031,714 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,031,714 |
|
|
$ |
12.15 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,951,241 |
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
3,982,955 |
|
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options |
|
Exercisable Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Range of |
|
Number of |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
Exercise Prices |
|
Options |
|
Life in Years |
|
Price |
|
Options |
|
Price |
$10.00 $12.75 |
|
|
3,982,955 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
|
|
85,781 |
|
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
The weighted-average fair value at grant date of the stock options granted during the five
months
ended June 30, 2008 was $4.66. During the five months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized $3 in
compensation expense related to stock options. As of June 30, 2008, the total unrecognized
compensation expense for non-vested stock options expected to vest was $14, which is being
amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.3 years. The total fair value of stock
options vested during the five months ended June 30, 2008 was less than $1.
Summary of Restricted Stock Units
Under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, each restricted stock unit granted represents the right
to receive one share of Dana common stock or, at the election of Dana
(for units awarded to board members) or for certain non-U.S. employees (for employee awarded units), cash equal to the market value per
share. All restricted stock units contain dividend equivalent rights. Restricted stock units
granted to non-employee directors vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary date of the grant and those granted to employees cliff vest fully after three years.
Compensation expense for stock-settled restricted stock units expected to vest is measured based on
the market price of our common stock at the date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period. Compensation expense for cash-settled restricted stock units
expected to vest is measured based on the market price of our common stock at the end of each
quarter and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
31
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity during the five months ended
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant- |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
34,790 |
|
|
|
10.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
34,790 |
|
|
|
10.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
291,925 |
|
|
|
9.91 |
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
325,215 |
|
|
$ |
9.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the five months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized less than $1 of compensation expense
related to restricted stock unit awards. As of June 30, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation
expense for non-vested restricted stock units expected to vest was $2, which is being amortized
over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.4 years. No restricted stock units vested during
the five months ended June 30, 2008.
Summary of Performance Shares
Each notional performance share granted under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan represents the
right to receive one share of Dana common stock or, at the election of certain non-U.S. employees,
cash equal to the market value per share, if specified performance goals are achieved.
Compensation expense for performance shares settled in stock is measured based on the market price
of our common stock at the date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period subject to assessment of achievement of performance goals. Participants can receive
from 50% to 250% of the targeted share award based on predetermined performance goals. Compensation
expense for performance shares settled in cash is measured based on the market price of the stock
at the end of each quarter and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period
subject to assessment of achievement of performance goals. Based on our current forecast, we do
not expect to achieve the goals for 2008.
Accordingly, no expense has been recognized for the 2008 portion of the performance shares. Since
no performance goals have been established for 2009 and 2010, the
corresponding amount of potential compensation
expense cannot be determined.
The following table summarizes performance share activity during the five months ended June
30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant- |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
827,874 |
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
826,374 |
|
|
$ |
10.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
2008 Annual Incentive Program
As previously disclosed, based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our
Board approved the 2008 Annual Incentive Program (2008 AIP) during the second quarter of 2008. The
2008 AIP is being implemented pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 2008 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. Below is a summary of the key terms of the 2008 AIP.
Certain eligible employees designated by Dana, including our named executive officers, may
participate in the 2008 AIP. The 2008 AIP is based on a calendar year performance period commencing
January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2008. All earned awards will be paid in cash during the
first quarter of 2009.
Awards under the 2008 AIP are based on certain target performance goals. EBITDA (50% weighted)
and free cash flow (50% weighted) are the financial measurement targets under the 2008 AIP. A
specified level of EBITDA must be achieved in order for any award to be paid. Awards for executive
officers, including the named executive officers, are determined based on a range of 50% of the
target performance his or her award (threshold) to 250% of the target performance award (maximum). Dana has
set for each participant a percentage of their annual base salary payable at threshold, target and
maximum. The cash award is ultimately determined for each participant based on the target actually
achieved.
Compensation expense is initially accrued based on probable achievement of the target performance
goal. This assumption is reviewed each quarter and if it becomes probable that such goals will not
be achieved or will be exceeded, compensation cost is adjusted with previous surplus compensation
cost reversed or additional cost recorded.
There is also individual performance recognition award potential through discretionary award
adjustments within specified guidelines. An employees performance must exceed a minimum level to
be eligible to earn any award. There is a maximum upward and downward adjustment of 20%, but the
aggregate payouts must not exceed the targeted award total.
Note 11. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
We have a number of defined contribution and defined benefit, qualified and nonqualified,
pension plans for certain employees. Other postretirement benefit plans, including medical and life
insurance, are provided for certain employees upon retirement.
The components of net periodic benefit costs (credits) for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Settlement (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Termination cost |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
after curtailments and settlements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of prior service
credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months Ended |
|
|
|
One Month Ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Curtailment (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Settlement (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Termination cost |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
(credit) after curtailments
and settlements |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months Ended |
|
|
|
One Month Ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of prior service
credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
(credit) after curtailments
and settlements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2008, we settled a substantial portion of the Canadian retiree
pension benefit obligations by purchasing non-participating annuity contracts to cover vested
benefits. This action necessitated a remeasurement of the assets and liabilities of the affected
plans as of May 31, 2008. The discount rate used for remeasurement was 5.50% versus 5.25% used at
January 31, 2008. As a result of the annuity purchases, we reduced the benefit obligation by $120
and also reduced the fair value of plan assets by $120. We recorded a settlement gain of $13 as a
reduction to cost of sales.
Acceptance of employee early retirement incentives in the U.S. required a remeasurement of
three plans which increased net assets by $3 and reduced the net defined benefit obligations by $32
and credited Other comprehensive income (OCI) for $35. The impact of the incentives generated
pension plan special termination costs of $7 which were included in Realignment charges, net and
curtailment losses of $3 charged against OCI.
During the first quarter of 2007, we announced the restructuring of our pension liabilities in
the U.K. necessitated by the planned divestiture of several non-core U.K. businesses. Pursuant to
the underlying agreement, we recorded $8 of pension curtailment cost as a realignment charge in the
first quarter of
34
2007 and a settlement charge of $145 in the second quarter of 2007 ($128 as a
realignment charge in continuing operations and $17 in discontinued operations). In the second
quarter of 2007, we recorded a pension curtailment gain of $11 related to the reversal of a
decision to close a U.S. facility.
During the first quarter of 2007, the sale of the engine hard parts business resulted in a
postretirement medical plan settlement gain of $12.
Certain changes to our U.S. pension and postretirement benefit plans implemented during the
bankruptcy process were:
|
|
|
elimination of postretirement healthcare benefits
for active non-union employees in the U.S.
effective as of April 1, 2007. This action reduced
our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
(APBO) for postretirement healthcare by $115 in
the first quarter of 2007. Because the elimination
of these benefits reduced benefits previously
earned, it was considered a negative plan
amendment. Accordingly, the reduction in the APBO
was offset by a credit to Accumulated other
comprehensive loss which was amortized to income
as a reduction of OPEB expense until the
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was
eliminated under fresh start accounting; |
|
|
|
|
contribution of an aggregate of $78 to a VEBA
trust for postretirement healthcare and life
insurance benefits for non-union retirees in the
U.S. in exchange for release of the Debtors from
these obligations. We funded our contribution with
payments of $25 in June 2007 and $53 in January
2008. In May 2007, we also made a $2 payment to
the International Association of Machinists (IAM)
to resolve all claims for postretirement
non-pension benefits after June 30, 2007 for
retirees and active employees represented by the
IAM. These actions reduced our APBO by $303 in the
second quarter of 2007, with $80 being offset by
the payment obligation to the VEBAs and $223 being
credited to Accumulated other comprehensive loss
which was eliminated under fresh start accounting;
and |
|
|
|
|
amendment of our U.S. pension plans for non-union employees to
freeze service credits and benefit accruals effective July 1,
2007. In connection with this action, we recorded a curtailment
charge of $3 during the second quarter of 2007 and certain plan
assets and obligations were remeasured resulting in a reduction of
liabilities offset by a credit to OCI of $63. |
Other changes related to our U.S. pensions and other postretirement benefits specific to
union-
represented employees and retirees were implemented on January 31, 2008 with our emergence from
bankruptcy. Under these provisions, we:
|
|
|
froze credited service and benefit accruals under our defined benefit pension plans for employees; |
|
|
|
|
agreed to make future contributions, based on a cents per hour formula, to a USW multiemployer
pension trust, which will provide future pension benefits for covered employees; |
|
|
|
|
eliminated non-pension retiree benefits (postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits)
for employees and retirees; and |
35
|
|
|
contributed an aggregate of approximately $733 in cash on February 1, 2008 (which is net of
amounts paid for non-pension retiree benefits, long-term disability and related healthcare claims
of retirees incurred and paid between July 1, 2007 and the date of emergence) to the
union-administered VEBAs. These VEBAs are completely independent of Dana and will provide
non-pension retiree benefits, disability benefits and related healthcare benefits, as determined
by the VEBA trustees, to eligible retirees. The VEBAs are administered by the VEBA trustees who
have full fiduciary responsibility for investing assets and determining benefit levels. We are
not obligated to provide incremental funding in the event of an asset shortfall and these assets
will never be returned to Dana. As a result of the changes in our U.S. other postretirement
benefits that became effective on January 31, 2008 with our emergence from bankruptcy, we
recognized a portion of the previously unrecognized prior service credits as a curtailment gain
of $61 due to the negative plan amendment and reported it as a component of the Gain on
settlement of liabilities subject to compromise. The gain was calculated based on the current
estimate of the future working lifetime attributable to those participants who will not be
eligible for benefits following the estimated exhaustion of funds. The calculation used current
plan assumptions and current levels of plan benefits. In connection with the recognition of our
obligations to the VEBAs at emergence, the APBO was reset to an amount equal to the VEBA
payments, resulting in a reduction of $278 with an offsetting credit to Accumulated other
comprehensive loss. |
Our postretirement healthcare obligations for all U.S. employees and retirees, including the
related cost and funding requirements, after making our VEBA contributions, have been eliminated.
With regard to pension benefits, credited service and benefit accruals have been frozen for all
U.S. employees in defined benefit plans. As a result, our future pension costs have been
significantly reduced.
Under fresh start accounting we were required to remeasure all defined benefit plan
obligations and assets. The discount rates used to measure the U.S. pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations were 6.13% and 6.10% at January 31, 2008 compared to 6.26% and
6.24% at December 31, 2007. The weighted average discount rates used to measure the non-U.S.
pension and other postretirement benefit obligations were 5.29% and 5.29% at January 31, 2008
compared to 5.27% and 5.29% at December 31, 2007. The generally adverse asset investment
performance during the month of January 2008 negatively impacted net obligations. As a result of
these changes, a net actuarial loss of $140 adversely affected the funded status of our plans,
reducing net assets by $35 and increasing the net defined benefit obligations by $105 with an
offset to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. The Accumulated other comprehensive loss balance at
January 31, 2008 was eliminated under fresh start accounting.
Note 12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes our net income (loss) and components of OCI such as
deferred currency translation gains and losses that are charged or credited directly to
shareholders equity.
36
The components of our total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Postretirement healthcare plan amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Immediate recognition of prior service
credit due to curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pension plan amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Pension plan settlements |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan curtailments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gain (loss) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to net income (loss) of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
U.K. pension settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
GETRAG deferred translation and pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Unrealized investment gains (losses) and other |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
(90 |
) |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $33 deferred translation gain reported for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was
primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Brazilian real. For the five
months ended June 30, 2008, both the euro ($36) and the Brazilian real ($36) strengthened relative
to the U.S. dollar, contributing to the deferred translation gain of $77.
OCI for the three and five months ended June 30, 2008 includes the plan remeasurement
resulting from the early retirement incentives taken in the U.S. which reduced our net pension
obligations by $35 (see Note 11). Curtailment losses related to these incentives of $3 were
charged against OCI. In addition, OCI for the same periods includes the plan remeasurement
pursuant to the settlement of a substantial portion of the retiree vested benefits in Canada (see
Note 11). As a result, the net funded status of these plans was improved by $20 ($13 net of tax).
Accordingly, a settlement gain of $13 ($9 net of tax) was recognized as an offset to benefit costs.
In the second quarter we also recorded a decline in value of $13 of a note receivable obtained in
connection with a previous divestiture.
As previously described in Note 11, OCI for the one month ended January 31, 2008 includes the
impact of the changes made to our U.S. other postretirement benefit plans specific to
union-represented employees effective with our emergence from bankruptcy. As a result of these
changes, we recognized $61 of previously unrecognized prior service credits as a curtailment gain.
In addition, OCI was credited with $278 pursuant to the plan change and establishment of the union
VEBAs. In connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting upon emergence, we were required
to re-measure the assets and liabilities of all of our defined benefit plans using updated
assumptions. As a result, OCI was charged with $140 in actuarial losses.
We reported U.S. OCI of $73, before considering the effect of income taxes, for the five
months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of currency
translation and actuarial gains. SFAS 109 provides an exception to the determination and recognition of tax expense
or benefit in continuing operations without regard to other categories of earnings, such as a loss
from discontinued operations or OCI. If there is an aggregate pre-tax income from other categories
and a pre-tax loss from continuing operations, even if a valuation allowance has been established
against deferred tax assets, the tax benefit allocated to
continuing operations is the amount by which the loss from continuing operations reduces the tax
expense recorded with respect to the other categories of earnings. This exception resulted in
reducing OCI for the quarter and five months ended June 30, 2008 by $26.
The $51 deferred translation gain reported for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was due
largely to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to a number of currencies including the
Brazilian real ($21), Canadian dollar ($8), euro ($6) and Australian dollar ($5). The Brazilian
real ($34), euro ($13), Canadian dollar ($9) and Australian dollar ($8) all gained value against
the U.S. dollar over the six months ended June 30, 2007, contributing to the deferred translation
gain of $67.
37
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, OCI included credits of $63 related to the
modification of pension plans and $223 resulting from the settlement of postretirement non-pension
benefits for non-union employees. OCI also reflects the amortization
of a loss of $144 related to
the settlement of the U.K. pension liabilities. See Note 11 for further information related to
these actions. In addition to the second quarter activity, OCI for the six months ended June 30,
2007 included a $115 credit related to the termination of postretirement healthcare coverage for
active non-union employees (see Note 11) and a charge of $93 to reclassify to net loss the deferred
translation gain and unamortized pension expense related to the sale in March 2007 of our equity
investment in GETRAG. Other includes $10 of pension adjustments related to our sale of the engine
hard parts business.
We reported U.S. OCI of $401, before considering the effect of income taxes, for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as a result of amending pension and other postretirement
benefit plans. In accordance with the SFAS 109 exception discussed above, we reduced OCI for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 by $73.
Note 13. Cash Deposits
Cash deposits are maintained to provide credit enhancement for certain agreements. These
deposits are recorded in Cash and cash equivalents. In most instances, these cash deposits may be
withdrawn if comparable security is provided in the form of letters of credit.
At June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents held in the U.S. amounted to $548. Included in
this amount was $71 of cash deposits maintained primarily to provide credit enhancement for certain lease
agreements, support surety bonds that enable us to self-insure our workers compensation
obligations in certain states and fund an escrow account required to appeal a judgment rendered in
Texas. Cash of $6 held by DCC is no longer restricted as the obligations under a forbearance agreement
were satisfied in January 2008.
At June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents held outside the U.S. amounted to $643. Included
in this amount was $26 of cash deposits maintained primarily to provide credit enhancement for certain lease
agreements and to support letters of credit, bank guarantees and certain employee benefit
obligations.
Our cash deposits are not considered to be restricted as they could be replaced by letters of
credit available under our Exit Facility (discussed in Note 14).
A substantial portion of our non-U.S. cash and cash equivalents is needed for working capital
and other operating purposes. Several countries have local regulatory requirements that
significantly restrict the ability of our operations to repatriate this cash. In addition, at June
30, 2008, $63 was held by consolidated entities that have minority interests with varying levels of
participation rights involving cash withdrawals. Beyond these restrictions, there are practical
limitations on repatriation of cash from certain countries because of the resulting tax
withholdings.
Note 14. Financing Agreements
Exit Financing
On the Effective Date, Dana, as Borrower, and certain of our domestic subsidiaries, as
guarantors, entered into the Exit Facility with Citicorp USA, Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Barclays Capital. The Exit Facility consists of the Term Facility in the total aggregate amount of
$1,430 and the $650 Revolving Facility. The Term Facility was fully drawn in borrowings of $1,350
on the Effective Date and $80 on February 1, 2008. Net proceeds were $1,276 after $114 of Original
issue discount (OID) and other customary issuance costs and fees of $40, both of which were
deferred and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the loan. There were no
borrowings under the Revolving Facility at the Effective Date, but $200 was utilized for existing
letters of credit. For an explanation of the terms of the Exit Facility, see Note 16 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of our 2007 Form 10-K.
38
At June 30, 2008, we had gross borrowings of $1,423 (before reduction of $107 for unamortized
OID) under the Term Facility and although we had no borrowings under the Revolving Facility, we had
utilized $192 for letters of credit. Based on our borrowing base collateral, we had availability at
that date under the Revolving Facility of $383 after deducting the outstanding letters of credit.
Through June 30, 2008 we are in full compliance with our debt covenants and expect to continue
to remain in compliance through year end and into 2009. Satisfying
the debt covenants in the future could require the use of a portion of available cash to
reduce debt.
We believe our overall liquidity and operating cash flow will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated cash requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, debt obligations and other
commitments for the foreseeable future.
Interest Rate Agreements
Interest on the Term Facility accrues at variable interest rates. Under the Term Facility we
are required to carry interest rate hedge agreements covering a notional amount of not less than
50% of the aggregate loans outstanding under the Term Facility for a period of no less than three
years. We paid $1 in May 2008 to enter into a series of contracts that effectively cap the LIBOR component of the
interest rate calculation for our Term Facility at 6.00% and our effective interest rate at 9.75%
through May 2011 on a notional amount of $713 of the Term Facility (reducing in quarterly steps to
$694 in February 2011). The contracts are adjusted to their fair
value monthly. The $2 fair value of the contracts as of June 30, 2008 is recorded as an asset.
DIP Credit Agreement
Prior Dana, as borrower, and its Debtor subsidiaries, as guarantors, were parties to the DIP
Credit Agreement that was initially approved by the Bankruptcy Court in March 2006. Under the DIP
Credit Agreement, we had a $650 revolving credit facility and a $900 term loan facility at December
31, 2007. For a discussion of the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement, see Note 16 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of our 2007 Form 10-K.
At December 31, 2007, we had borrowed $900 under the DIP Credit Agreement. All of the loans
and other obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement were repaid as part of the consummation of the
Plan, primarily from the funding obtained from the Exit Facility. Outstanding letters of credit
issued under the DIP Credit Agreement were transferred to the Exit Facility on January 31, 2008.
European Receivables Loan Facility
In July 2007, certain of our European subsidiaries entered into definitive agreements to
establish an accounts receivable securitization program. The agreements include a Receivable Loan
Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with GE Leveraged Loans Limited (GE) that provides for a five-year
accounts receivable securitization facility under which up to the euro equivalent of $225 in
financing is available to those European subsidiaries (collectively, the Sellers) subject to the
availability of adequate levels of accounts receivable. For a discussion of this facility and the
receivables program, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of our 2007
Form 10-K. At June 30, 2008, there was availability of $192 and there were borrowings under this
facility equivalent to $19 recorded as notes payable. The proceeds from the borrowings are used for
operations and for the repayment of intercompany debt.
Canadian Credit Agreement
In June 2006, Dana Canada Corporation (Dana Canada), as borrower, and certain of its Canadian
affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement (the Canadian Credit Agreement) with
Citibank Canada, as agent, initial lender and an issuing bank, and with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Toronto Branch, and Bank of America, N.A., Canada Branch, as initial lenders and issuing banks. The
Canadian Credit Agreement provided for a $100 revolving credit facility, of which $5 was available
for the issuance of letters of credit. At January 31, 2008, less than $1 of the facility was being
utilized for the letters of credit and there had been no borrowings over the life of this
agreement. The Canadian Credit Agreement was terminated upon our emergence from bankruptcy.
39
Note 15. Fair Value Measurements
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), defines fair value, provides a framework
for measuring fair value and establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs (highest priority) include unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs include other than quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities that are observable either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs (lowest priority) include unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity
to develop its own assumptions. |
We have deferred the adoption of SFAS 157 with respect to nonfinancial assets and liabilities,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually), in accordance with the provisions of FASB Staff Position FAS
157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.
In measuring the fair value of our assets and liabilities, we use market data or assumptions
that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability including
assumptions about risk when appropriate. Our valuation techniques include a combination of
observable and unobservable inputs. A decrease in the valuation of notes receivable during the
quarter of $13 was charged to OCI. The decrease was attributable to changes in observable inputs as
we did not revise our unobservable input assumptions. As of June 30, 2008, our assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency forward
contracts |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency forward
contracts |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value during the period (pre-tax) |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of value included in Interest Income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss included in OCI |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of value included in Interest Income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of value included in Interest Income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss included in OCI |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
The note receivable, which was obtained in connection with a divestiture in 2004, is adjusted
each quarter based on the market value of the debt of the obligor.
See Interest Rate Agreements in Note 14 for a discussion of the interest rate caps.
We manufacture and sell our products in a number of countries and, as a result, are exposed to
movements in foreign currency exchange rates. From time to time, we enter into forward contracts
to manage the exposure on forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies and to manage
the risk of transaction gains and losses associated with assets/liabilities denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries. The changes in the fair
value of these forward contracts are recorded in Other income.
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Impact of Our Bankruptcy Filing
During our Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, most actions against the Debtors relating to
pre-petition liabilities were automatically stayed. Substantially all of our pre-petition
liabilities were addressed under the Plan. Our emergence from bankruptcy resolved certain of our
contingencies as discussed below.
During January 2008, both an Ad Hoc Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants as well as
an asbestos claimant, Jose Angel Valdez, filed notices of appeal of the Confirmation Order. During
February 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated
the two appeals. Prior Dana and the other post-emergence Debtors filed with the District Court (i)
a motion to dismiss the consolidated appeal and (ii) a brief in support of the motion to dismiss
and on the merits of the consolidated appeal. The consolidated appeal and the motion to dismiss are
currently pending before the District Court, with oral arguments yet to be scheduled.
Class Action Lawsuit and Derivative Actions
A securities class action entitled Howard Frank v. Michael J. Burns and Robert C. Richter was
originally filed in October 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio,
naming our former Chief Executive Officer, Michael J. Burns, and former Chief Financial Officer,
Robert C. Richter, as defendants. In a consolidated complaint filed in August 2006, lead plaintiffs
alleged violations of the U.S. securities laws and claimed that the price at which our stock traded
at various times between April 2004 and October 2005 was artificially inflated as a result of the
defendants alleged wrongdoing. In June 2007, the District Court denied lead plaintiffs motion for
an order partially lifting the statutory discovery stay which would have enabled them to obtain
copies of certain documents produced to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). By order
dated August 21, 2007, the District Court granted the defendants motion to dismiss the
consolidated complaint and entered a judgment closing the case. In September 2007, the lead
plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the District Courts order and judgment. As of the date
hereof, the appeal has been fully briefed. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
A stockholder derivative action entitled Roberta Casden v. Michael J. Burns, et al., was
originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in March 2006. An
amended complaint filed in August 2006 added alleged non-derivative class claims on behalf of
holders of our stock alleging, among other things, that the defendants (our former Board of
Directors, former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer) had breached their
fiduciary duties and acted in bad faith in determining to file for protection under the Bankruptcy
Laws. These alleged non-derivative class claims are not asserted against Dana. In June 2006, the
District Court stayed the derivative claims, deferring to the Bankruptcy Court on those claims. In
July 2007, the District Court dismissed the non-derivative class claims asserted in the amended
complaint and entered a judgment closing the case. In August 2007, the plaintiff filed a
notice of appeal from the District Courts order and judgment. As of the date hereof, the appeal
has been fully briefed. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
41
SEC Investigation
In September 2005, we reported that management was investigating accounting matters arising
out of incorrect entries related to a customer agreement in our Commercial Vehicle operations, and
that the Prior Dana Audit Committee had engaged outside counsel to conduct an independent
investigation of these matters as well. Outside counsel informed the SEC of the investigation,
which ended in December 2005, the same month that we filed restated financial statements for the
first two quarters of 2005 and the years 2002 through 2004. In January 2006, we learned that the
SEC had issued a formal order of investigation with respect to matters related to our restatements.
The SECs investigation is a non-public, fact-finding inquiry to determine whether any violations
of the law have occurred. We are continuing to cooperate fully with the SEC in the investigation.
Legal Proceedings Arising in the Ordinary Course of Business
We are a party to various pending judicial and administrative proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. These include, among others, proceedings based on product liability
claims and alleged violations of environmental laws. We have reviewed these pending legal
proceedings, including the probable outcomes, our reasonably anticipated costs and expenses, the
availability and limits of our insurance coverage and surety bonds and our established reserves for
uninsured liabilities.
Further information about some of these legal proceedings follows, including information about
our accruals for the liabilities that may arise from such proceedings. We accrue for contingent
liabilities at the time when we believe they are both probable and estimable. We review our
assessments of probability and estimability as new information becomes available and adjust our
accruals quarterly, if appropriate. Since we do not accrue for contingent liabilities that we
believe are probable unless we can reasonably estimate the amounts of such liabilities, our actual
liabilities may exceed the amounts we have recorded. We do not believe that any liabilities that
may result from these proceedings are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity or financial condition.
Asbestos Personal Injury Liabilities
We had approximately 42,000 active pending asbestos personal injury liability claims at June
30, 2008, which is generally unchanged from the number of claims pending at December 31, 2007,
including approximately 10,000 claims that were settled but awaiting final documentation and
payment. In connection with applying fresh start accounting, we assigned probabilities to the
values underlying the estimated range of future asbestos indemnity and defense costs included in
the December 31, 2007 actuarial valuation obtained to estimate our liability associated with these
obligations. The related cash flows were probability weighted and discounted to determine the fair
value as of January 31, 2008. As a result, we have accrued $145 for indemnity and defense costs for
pending and future asbestos personal injury liability claims at June 30, 2008. Our policy before
the adoption of fresh start accounting had been to accrue the undiscounted low end of the range of
projected obligations, which had resulted in an accrual of $136 at December 31, 2007.
Prior
to 2006, we had reached agreements with some of our insurers to commute policies covering
asbestos personal injury claims. We apply proceeds from insurance commutations first to reduce any
recorded recoverable amount related to that insurer. Proceeds from commutations in excess of our estimated recoverable
amount for pending and future claims are recorded as a credit to other income. Commutation proceeds
of $2 were credited to other income in the five months ended June 30, 2008.
At June 30, 2008, we had recorded $73 as an asset for probable recovery from our insurers for
the pending and projected asbestos personal injury liability claims, compared to $69 recorded at
December 31, 2007. The June 30 amount was also discounted using the same methodology as the
associated liability. The recorded asset reflects our assessment of the capacity of our current
insurance agreements
to provide for the payment of anticipated defense and indemnity costs for pending claims and
projected future demands. These recoveries take into account elections to extend existing coverage
which we exercised in order to maximize our insurance recovery. The recorded asset does not
represent the limits of our insurance coverage, but rather the amount we would expect to recover if
we paid the accrued indemnity and defense costs.
42
In addition, we had a net amount receivable from our insurers and others of $18 at June 30,
2008, compared to $17 at December 31, 2007. The receivable represents reimbursements for settled
asbestos personal injury liability claims, including billings in progress and amounts subject to
alternate dispute resolution proceedings with some of our insurers. It is anticipated that a
favorable settlement to these proceedings will be finalized soon.
As part of our reorganization, assets and liabilities associated with asbestos claims were
retained in Prior Dana which was then merged into Dana Companies, LLC, a consolidated wholly owned
subsidiary of Dana. The assets of Dana Companies, LLC include insurance rights relating to coverage
against these liabilities and other assets which we believe are sufficient to satisfy its
liabilities. Dana Companies, LLC continues to process asbestos personal injury claims in the normal
course of business, is separately managed and has an independent board member. The independent
board member is required to approve certain transactions including dividends or other transfers of
$1 or more of value to Dana.
Other Product Liabilities
We had accrued $4 for non-asbestos product liability costs at June 30, 2008, unchanged from
the liability at December 31, 2007, with no recovery expected from third parties at either date. We
estimate these liabilities based on assumptions about the value of the claims and about the
likelihood of recoveries against us derived from our historical experience and current information.
Environmental Liabilities
Accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2008 were $20, compared to $180 at December 31,
2007. The reduction is attributable to the discharge of underlying environmental claims upon
emergence. A portion of these claims is being addressed through the disputed claims process
described in Note 2. As such, the resolution of these matters will not have an impact on our
post-emergence financial condition or results of operations.
We considered the most probable method of remediation, current laws and regulations and
existing technology in determining the fair value of our remaining
environmental liabilities of our remaining environmental liabilities as of
January 31, 2008 and the accrued liability at June 30, 2008.
One of the larger claims at emergence was a claim involving the Hamilton Avenue Industrial
Park (Hamilton) site in New Jersey. We are a potentially responsible party at this site (also known
as the Cornell Dubilier Electronics or CDE site) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). This matter has been the subject of an estimation
proceeding as a result of our objection to a claim filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and other federal agencies (collectively, the Government) in connection with this and
several other CERCLA sites. During the course of the proceedings and our efforts to address the
Governments claim, no additional information was provided to support any adjustment to the amounts
we had accrued for this matter. For the past several months, we have been actively litigating the
claim and negotiating a settlement with the Government on the Hamilton site as well as other
environmental claims. We reached tentative agreement with the Government in April 2008 providing
for an allowed general unsecured claim of $126, which will be settled by distribution of shares
from the disputed claims reserve. The mandatory public comment period is now underway. If no
comments are received, the settlement will be referred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York for approval. At December 31, 2007, we had concluded there was a probable
settlement outcome and adjusted the December 2007 liability to the tentative $126 settlement
amount.
Other Liabilities Related to Asbestos Claims
After the Center for Claims Resolution (CCR) discontinued negotiating shared settlements for
asbestos claims for its member companies in 2001, some former CCR members defaulted on the
payment of their shares of some settlements and some settling claimants sought payment of the
unpaid shares from other members of the CCR at the time of the settlements, including from us. We
have been working with the CCR, other former CCR members, our insurers and the claimants over a
period of several years in an effort to resolve these issues. Through June 30, 2008, we had paid
$47 to claimants and collected $37 with respect to these claims. At June 30, 2008, we had a
receivable of $10 that we expect to recover from available insurance and surety bonds relating to
these claims.
43
Note 17. Warranty Obligations
We record a liability for
estimated warranty obligations at the dates our products are sold.
We record the liability based on our estimate of costs to settle the claim. Adjustments are made as new
information becomes available. Our warranty activity for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
Amounts accrued for current period
sales |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Adjustments of prior accrual estimates |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Settlements of warranty claims |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have been notified
by two of our larger customers that quality issues relating to products
supplied by us could result in warranty claims. Our customers have advised us of
alleged vehicle performance issues which may be attributable to our product. We are
currently investigating the information provided by these customers and we are performing product
testing to ascertain whether the reported performance failures are attributable to our products. At
June 30, 2008, no liability had been recorded for these matters as the information currently
available to us is insufficient to assess our liability, if any.
Note 18. Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 109. Current and deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are recognized based on events which have occurred and are measured under
enacted tax laws. Based on our history of losses and our near-term profit outlook, we have
established 100% valuation allowances against our U.S. deferred tax assets. Similar valuation
allowances are recorded in other countries such as the U.K. where, based on the profit outlook,
realization of the deferred tax asset does not satisfy the more likely than not recognition
criterion.
The tax expense or benefit recorded in operations is generally determined without regard to
other categories of earnings, such as the results of discontinued operations or OCI. An exception is
provided if there is aggregate pre-tax income from other categories and a pre-tax loss from
continuing operations, even if a valuation allowance has been established against deferred tax
assets. The tax benefit allocated to continuing operations is the
amount by which the loss from continuing operations reduces the tax expense recorded with respect
to the other categories of earnings.
Prior to considering the effect of income taxes, our operations in the U.S. reported OCI of
$73 for the five months ended June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of currency translation. The
exception described in the preceding paragraph resulted in a year-to-date charge to OCI of $26. An
offsetting tax benefit was attributed to continuing operations; however, the benefits recorded in
continuing operations for the three months and five months ended June 30, 2008 were limited to less
than $1 and $14 due to interperiod tax allocation rules, leaving a deferred credit balance of $12
in other accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2008. The amount to
be recognized in the remainder
of 2008 will be affected by the OCI and pre-tax loss from continuing operations reported by our operations in the U.S.
44
In
connection with the reorganization process, we determined in 2007
that $970 of accumulated earnings in our non-U.S. operations was not
indefinitely reinvested, and we recorded the estimated liability
associated with repatriating these earnings. During the second
quarter of 2008, we modified our repatriation plans and recorded a
tax benefit of $14, net of valuation allowances, to reduce the
estimated liability.
With
the exception of the tax benefits which offset the OCI tax charges in
2007 and 2008, we have not
recognized tax benefits on losses generated since 2005 in several countries, including the U.S. and
the U.K., where the recent history of operating losses does not allow
us to satisfy the more likely
than not criterion for realization of deferred tax assets. Consequently, there is no income tax
benefit against the pre-tax losses of these jurisdictions as valuation allowances are established
offsetting the associated tax benefit. The valuation allowance impact relating to these countries
and the impairment of $75 of goodwill in 2008 are the primary factors which cause
the tax expense of $12 and $3 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 to differ from
expected tax benefit of $44 and $38 at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%. These factors are
the primary cause for the tax expense of $231 ($199 for January and $32 for February to June) and
$18 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 to differ
from the expected 2008 tax expense of
$276 ($320 expense in January and a $44 benefit in February to June) and the expected 2007 tax
benefit of $47 using the 35% rate, with the effect of fresh start accounting adjustments also
contributing to the January 2008 difference.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file income tax returns in multiple
jurisdictions and are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. With few
exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local or foreign income tax
examinations for years before 1999. The 1999 2002 U.S. federal audits are effectively settled
except for a determination of the treatment of certain leasing transactions. The closing agreements
on these transactions are expected to be finalized during 2008 and the effect, if any, on the
financial statements is not expected to be material.
We are currently under audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2003 to 2005
taxation years and by foreign authorities for certain other tax years. These audits are expected
to be completed in late 2008 or early 2009. Based on the disposition of certain audit findings, we
recorded additional tax liabilities of $13 in the second quarter of 2008 related to pre-emergence
tax liabilities and, in accordance with SFAS 109 requirements, charged the adjustment to goodwill.
After 2008, SFAS 141(R) will require any adjustments to our pre-emergence liability for uncertain
tax positions be recorded as tax expense.
When tax issues for 1999 through 2005 are settled with the IRS and other foreign tax
authorities the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for all open tax years may be modified.
Audit outcomes and the timing of the audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty;
therefore, we cannot make an estimate of the impact at this time. While most tax obligations were
recognized as allowed priority tax claims, and effectively retained, certain tax liabilities were
settled on emergence from bankruptcy.
Generally, the discharge of a debt obligation for an amount less than the adjusted issue price
creates cancellation of indebtedness income (CODI), which must be included in the obligors taxable
income. However, recognition of CODI is limited for a taxpayer that is a debtor in a reorganization
case if the discharge is granted by the court or pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by
the court. The Plan enabled the Debtors to qualify for this bankruptcy exclusion rule. Therefore,
the CODI triggered by discharge of debt under the Plan will affect the taxable income of the
Debtors by reducing certain income tax attributes otherwise available in the following order: (i)
net operating losses (NOLs) for the year of discharge and net operating loss carryforwards; (ii)
most credit carryforwards, including the general business credit and the minimum tax credit; (iii)
net capital losses for the year of discharge and capital loss carryforwards; and (iv) the tax basis
of the debtors assets. A debtor may elect to avoid the prescribed order of attribute reduction
and instead reduce the basis of certain property first. We have not completed our analysis as to
whether it would be beneficial to reduce the basis of certain property before reducing NOLs. Our
financial statements assume that we will reduce the NOLs first.
45
We are in the process of finalizing our analysis regarding the impact of CODI on our
attributes. We expect to complete our analysis in late 2008 in connection with the filing of our
short period 2008 tax return. Our current estimate is that we will have pre-emergence NOLs in the
U.S. of approximately $300 that remain available after emergence. The deferred tax assets related
to our pre-emergence U.S. NOLs, including those remaining post-emergence, have a full valuation
allowance.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code will impose an annual limitation on our use of these
pre-emergence NOLs. There is also a limitation on the recognition of built-in losses generated as a
result of an ownership change. Generally, under a special rule applicable to ownership changes
occurring in connection with a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, the annual limitation amount is
equal to the value of the stock of a company immediately after emergence multiplied by an
applicable federal rate. In our case this would result in an annual limitation of approximately $87
for approximately 20 years.
We paid approximately $733 following emergence to fund a VEBA for certain union employee
benefit obligations. We are currently evaluating applicable tax laws and regulations to determine
the timing of the deduction for the amount paid. As currently presented, the amount paid is assumed
to be deductible in the post-emergence period and not a deduction that would increase the $300 of
pre-emergence NOLs that are subject to the limitations imposed by the IRS.
Note 19. Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
DCC other income (loss), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Divestiture gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Claim settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Government grants |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency denominated intercompany loan obligations to the U.S. with an equivalent
value of $162 at June 30, 2008 are not considered permanently invested as they are expected to be
repaid in the near term. Accordingly, the foreign exchange gains on these loans are included in
foreign exchange gain (loss) above, rather than as translation gain in OCI. During the second
quarter of 2008, we entered into foreign exchange contracts providing an economic hedge against
exchange rate movements on these loans. At June 30, 2008, there are contracts having a notional
amount of $377. These contracts are marked to market, with the gain or loss reflected in foreign
exchange gain (loss). The claim settlement charge of $11 represents the estimated costs to settle
a contractual matter with an investor in one of our equity investments.
Note 20. Segments
We manage our operations globally through two manufacturing business units ASG and HVSG.
ASG has five operating segments focused on specific products for the automotive light vehicle
market: Light Axle, Driveshaft, Sealing, Thermal and Structures. HVSG has two operating segments
focused on specific medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicle markets: Commercial Vehicle and Off-Highway.
We report operating and related disclosures about each of our seven segments below on a basis that
is used internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to
those segments.
Costs not included in the business unit and operating segment results are related primarily to
corporate administrative services, shared service centers, trailing liabilities of closed
operations and other administrative activities for which the charges are not allocated to the
operating segments. In addition, segment operating results are reported using the FIFO inventory
valuation method with the LIFO versus FIFO difference included as part of the reconciling items.
Management had previously utilized earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as the primary
internal segment profit measure. While EBIT and net
46
income continue to be important profit
measures, in 2008 the primary measure was changed to segment
EBITDA, to enhance the comparability and usefulness of our operating segment results after
application of fresh start accounting upon emergence from bankruptcy.
Although a non-GAAP financial measure, segment EBITDA is also more closely aligned with the
performance measurements in our debt covenants. EBITDA, as defined for both internal performance
measurement and debt covenant compliance, excludes equity in earnings of affiliates, minority
interest, discontinued operations, certain nonrecurring and unusual items such as goodwill
impairment, amortization of fresh start inventory step-up and divestiture gains and losses.
We used the following information to evaluate our operating segments for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Structures |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Structures |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used the following information to evaluate our operating segments for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months Ended |
|
|
|
One Month Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Structures |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,894 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Structures |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles segment EBITDA to the consolidated income (loss) from
continuing operations before income tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment EBITDA |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
Shared services and administrative |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
Other income (expense) not in segments |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Foreign exchange not in segments |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of fresh start inventory step-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realignment |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
DCC EBIT |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items, net |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Fresh start accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
losses from continuing operations before income taxes of $125 and $127 for the three and
five months ended June 30, 2008 include net expenses of $26 and
$57 related to adjustments arising
from the application of fresh start accounting, primarily amortization of intangibles, the
expensing of the incremental value of inventories sold during the period and additional
depreciation expense.
49
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes in this report.
Forward-looking Information
Statements in this report (or otherwise made by us or on our behalf) that are not entirely
historical constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are indicated by words such as
anticipates, expects, believes, intends, plans, estimates, projects and similar
expressions. These statements represent the present expectations of Dana Holding Corporation (Dana,
we or us) and its consolidated subsidiaries based on our current information and assumptions.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Our plans, actions
and actual results could differ materially from our present expectations due to a number of
factors, including those discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (our 2007 Form 10-K) and in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date
made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report.
Management Overview
Dana Holding Corporation (Dana), incorporated in Delaware, is headquartered in Toledo, Ohio.
We are a leading supplier of axle, driveshaft, structural, and sealing and thermal management
products for global vehicle manufacturers. Our people design and manufacture products for every
major vehicle producer in the world. We employ approximately 35,000 people in 26 countries and
operate 113 major facilities throughout the world.
As a result of Dana Corporations emergence from operating under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) on January 31, 2008 (the Effective Date), Dana is the
successor registrant to Dana Corporation (Prior Dana) pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
The terms Dana, we, our, and us, when used in this report with respect to the period
prior to Dana Corporations emergence from bankruptcy, are references to Prior Dana, and when used
with respect to the period commencing after Dana Corporations emergence, are references to Dana.
These references include the subsidiaries of Prior Dana or Dana, as the case may be, unless
otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise.
Business Strategy
Dana currently has seven operating segments that supply driveline
products, structures and engine components to customers in the
automotive, commercial vehicle and off-highway markets. We have
been, and will continue to, evaluate the strategy for each of our
businesses. While the strategy is still evolving, we currently
anticipate a focus primarily on driveline products in the above three
markets. Although our North American automotive driveline operations
need to be improved, becoming more competitive through consolidation
or internal restructuring, we see significant growth opportunities in
our other driveline businesses, particularly outside North America.
In our non-driveline businesses, we are evaluating a number of
strategic options appropriate for Dana and these businesses.
Emergence from Reorganization Proceedings and Related Subsequent Events
Background Dana and forty of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors)
operated their businesses as debtors in possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code from
March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date) until emergence from Chapter 11 on January 31, 2008. The Debtors
Chapter 11 cases (collectively, the Bankruptcy Cases) were consolidated in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court) under the caption In
re Dana Corporation, et al. , Case No. 06-10354 (BRL). Neither Dana Credit Corporation (DCC) and
its subsidiaries nor any of our non-U.S. affiliates were Debtors.
50
Claims resolution On December 26, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the
Confirmation Order) confirming the Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Debtors and
Debtors-in-Possession as modified (the Plan) and, on the Effective Date, the Plan was consummated
and we emerged from bankruptcy. As provided in the Plan and the Confirmation Order, we issued and
distributed approximately 70 million shares of Dana common stock (valued in reorganization at
$1,628) on the Effective Date to holders of allowed general unsecured claims in Class 5B totaling
approximately $2,050. Pursuant to the Plan, we also issued and set aside approximately 28 million
additional shares of Dana common stock (valued in reorganization at $640) for future distribution
to holders of allowed unsecured nonpriority claims in Class 5B under the Plan. These shares are
being distributed as the disputed and unliquidated claims are resolved. The claim amount related
to the 28 million shares for disputed and unliquidated claims was estimated not to exceed $700.
Since emergence and through the date of this filing, we have distributed an additional 8 million
shares for allowed claims (valued in reorganization at $182) increasing the total distribution to
$1,810 for unsecured claims of approximately $2,090. The corresponding decrease in the disputed
claims reserve leaves 20 million shares (valued in
reorganization at $458). The claim amount
related to the remaining shares for disputed and unliquidated claims is estimated to be
approximately $540. To the extent that these remaining claims are settled for less than $540,
additional distributions will be made to the holders of the previously allowed general unsecured
claims in Class 5B. The terms and conditions governing these distributions are set forth in the
Plan and the Confirmation Order.
Under the provisions of the Plan, approximately two million shares of common stock (valued in
reorganization at $46) have been issued and distributed since the Effective Date to pay emergence
bonuses to union employees and non-union hourly and salaried non-management employees. The
original accrual of $47 on the Effective Date included approximately 60,000 shares (valued in
reorganization at $1) that will not be utilized for these bonuses. These shares will be
distributed instead to the holders of allowed general unsecured claims in Class 5B as provided in
the Plan.
Settlement obligations relating to non-pension retiree benefits and long-term disability (LTD)
benefits for union claimants and non-pension retiree benefits for non-union claimants were
satisfied with cash payments of $788 to non-Dana sponsored Voluntary Employee Benefit Associations
(VEBAs) established for the benefit of the respective claimant groups. Additionally, we paid DCC
$49, the remaining amount due to DCC noteholders, thereby settling DCCs general unsecured claim of
$325 against the Debtors. DCC, in turn, used these funds to repay the noteholders in full. Since
emergence, payments of $97 have been made for administrative claims, priority tax claims,
settlement pool claims and other classes of allowed claims of $212, with the remaining cash
payments of $115 expected to be made during the remainder of 2008.
Common Stock As discussed in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of
Part 1, pursuant to the Plan, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Prior Dana common stock,
par value $1.00 per share, and any other outstanding equity securities of Prior Dana, including all
options and warrants, were cancelled on the Effective Date, and we began the process of issuing 100
million shares of Dana common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Preferred Stock As discussed in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1
of Part 1, pursuant to the Plan, we also issued 2,500,000 shares of 4.0% Series A Preferred Stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the Series A Preferred), and 5,400,000 shares of 4.0% Series B Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Series B Preferred), on the Effective Date. See Note 8 to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I for dividend and conversion terms,
dividend payments and an explanation of registration rights.
Financing at emergence As discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 1 of Part 1, we entered into an exit financing facility (the Exit Facility) on the
Effective Date. The Exit Facility consists of a Term Facility Credit and Guaranty Agreement in
the total aggregate amount of $1,430 (the Term Facility) and a $650 Revolving Credit and Guaranty
Agreement (the Revolving Facility). The Term Facility was fully drawn with borrowings of $1,350 on
the Effective Date and $80 on February 1, 2008. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 1 of Part I for the terms and conditions of these facilities and the
availability of additional borrowing.
51
Fresh Start Accounting As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP), we adopted fresh start accounting effective February 1, 2008 following the
guidance of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code (SOP 90-7). The
financial statements for the periods ended prior to January 31, 2008 do not include the effect of
any changes in our capital structure or changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities as a
result of fresh start accounting. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of
Part I for an explanation of the impact of emerging from reorganization and applying fresh start
accounting on our financial position.
Reorganization Proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
The Bankruptcy Cases
The Bankruptcy Cases were jointly administered, and the Debtors managed their businesses as
debtors in possession subject to the supervision of the Bankruptcy Court. We continued normal
business operations during the bankruptcy process and emerged from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008.
Claims resolution
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I for an explanation of
the distributions under the Plan. Except as specifically provided in the Plan, the distributions
under the Plan were in exchange for, and in complete satisfaction, discharge and release of, all
claims and third-party ownership interests in the Debtors arising on or before the Effective Date,
including any interest accrued on such claims from and after the Filing Date.
DCC Notes
DCC is a U.S. subsidiary of Dana but was not part of the bankruptcy. At the time of the
bankruptcy filing, DCC had outstanding notes totaling approximately $399. DCC sold substantially
all of its asset portfolio and used the proceeds to pay down the DCC Notes to a balance of $49 as
of the Effective Date. Dana and DCC had executed a settlement agreement whereby they agreed to the
discontinuance of a tax sharing agreement between them and to a stipulated amount of a general
unsecured claim owed by Prior Dana to DCC of $325 (the DCC Claim). On the Effective Date and
pursuant to the Plan, Dana paid DCC $49, the remaining amount due to DCC noteholders, thereby
settling DCCs general unsecured claim of $325 against the Debtors. DCC, in turn, used these funds
to repay the noteholders in full.
Business Units
We manage our operations globally through two business units ASG and HVSG. ASG focuses on
the automotive market and primarily supports light vehicle original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
with products for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), crossover utility vehicles (CUVs),
vans and passenger cars. ASG has five product based operating segments: Light Axle, Driveshaft,
Structures, Sealing and Thermal. While being primarily focused on the light vehicle automotive
market, certain of the ASG operating segments also support the commercial vehicle and off-highway
markets.
HVSG supports the OEMs of medium-duty (Classes 5-7) and heavy-duty (Class 8) commercial
vehicles (primarily trucks and buses) and off-highway vehicles (primarily wheeled vehicles used in
construction and agricultural applications). HVSG has two operating segments focused on specific
markets: Commercial Vehicle and Off-Highway.
Trends in Our Markets
Light Vehicle Markets
North America
North American light vehicle production levels were 15% lower in the second quarter of 2008
than in the second quarter of 2007 and 12% lower in the first half of 2008 when compared to 2007.
In the light truck segment, second-quarter 2008 production levels were down 22% versus 2007 while
first half production was down 17%. Several vehicles with significant
Dana content are full-size
pickups and SUVs.
52
Within these categories of the light truck segment, production was more than 35% lower when
compared to last years second quarter and lower by more than 25% versus last years first six
months. The comparatively lower light truck production levels are consistent with the decline in
North American light truck sales which are off more than 16% during the first half of 2008 from
sales during the same period in 2007. As with production, the sales decline in pickups and SUVs
during this period has been even greater at more than 20%. The weakness in light truck sales has
been influenced, in part, by consumer concerns over high fuel prices, declining home values,
increased unemployment and other economic factors. Further, there is a view shared by many industry
observers today that the expectation of continued high fuel prices is resulting in what will become
a longer-term shift in consumer interest away from trucks and SUVs to more fuel efficient passenger
cars and CUVs. While a number of our newer programs involve CUVs, pick-up and SUV platforms
continue to be a key segment for us, particularly with a number of high sales pick-up truck
platforms (source: Global Insight and Wards Automotive).
The lower rate of light truck sales during 2008 has led to increased inventories. The days
supply of light truck inventories in the U.S. of 65 days at December 31, 2007 increased to 76 days
at the end of March and 92 days at June 30, 2008. In particular, the inventory of full size
pick-ups and SUVs is 137 days and 114 days at June 30, 2008. Given the current level of inventory,
high fuel prices and negative economic developments a weaker housing market, increasing
unemployment and lower consumer confidence we expect the weakness in light truck sales and
production in North America to continue for the remainder of 2008 and into 2009. Most projections
now have overall North American light vehicle production for 2008 being less than 14 million units,
with some forecasting full year production to be as low as 13.3 million units down from 15.0
million units in 2007 (source: Global Insight & Wards Automotive).
Rest of World
In contrast to North America, light truck production in the rest of the world continues to be
relatively strong. Global light vehicle production, excluding North America, is currently forecast
to be about 58.9 million units in 2008, up about 5% compared to 2007. Whereas the light vehicle
markets in South America, Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe continue to be strong, in Western Europe
the onset of some market softening has started to appear in the form of lower vehicle sales and
production cutbacks by certain European OEMs (source: Global Insight).
OEM Mix
The declining sales of light vehicles (especially light trucks, which generally have a higher
profit margin than passenger cars) in North America, as well as losses of market share to
competitors such as Toyota and Nissan, continue to put pressure on three of our largest light
vehicle customers: Ford, GM and Chrysler. These three customers accounted for approximately 70% of
light truck production in North America in the first six months of 2008, as compared to about 75%
of light truck production in the first half of 2007 (source: Global Insight). We expect that any
continuing loss of market share by these customers could result in their applying renewed pricing
pressure on us relative to our existing business and affecting our efforts to generate new
business.
Commercial Vehicle Markets
North America
Our commercial vehicle business is significantly impacted by the North American market, with
more than 80% of our commercial vehicle sales being to North American customers. Production of
heavy duty (Class 8) vehicles during the second quarter of 2008 of 55,000 units was up 22% from the
same period in 2007. First half 2008 Class 8 production of 102,000 units is down about 13% from the
first six months of 2007. The Class 8 production comparisons are influenced by the engine emission
regulation change which became effective at the beginning of 2007. First quarter 2007 sales
benefited from vehicle owners purchasing, from dealer inventory, the lower cost engines built prior
to the new emission standards. Production levels for the remainder of 2007 were at comparatively
lower levels as many customers with new vehicle needs accelerated their purchases into 2006 or the
first quarter of 2007 in advance of the higher costing vehicles meeting the new emission
requirements. Production levels in the Class 8 market have not rebounded as quickly in 2008 as
previously expected, in part due to higher fuel costs causing customers to postpone purchases of
the newer vehicles as a means of minimizing increased overall
53
operating costs. Whereas production levels for 2008 were previously expected to be approximately
230,000 units, we are now anticipating production for the year of about 205,000 units (source:
Global Insight & ACT).
In
the medium-duty (Class 5-7) market, second quarter 2008 production of 49,000 units was down
9% from last years second quarter. For the first six months of
2008, medium-duty production was
13% lower than the same period of 2007. Medium-duty production levels have also been adversely
impacted by high fuel costs and the same economic factors discussed in the Light Vehicle Markets
North America market trends section. As a consequence, medium-duty vehicle production is now
expected to be around 186,000 units for the full year 2008, down from our expectation of 220,000
units (source: Global Insight & ACT).
Rest of World
Outside
of North America, commercial vehicle heavy- and medium-duty production continues to
grow, particularly in emerging Eastern European and Asian markets. Global commercial vehicle
production, excluding North America, is currently expected to approximate 2.3 million units in
2008, an increase of more than 4% over 2007 (source: Global Insight & ACT).
Off-Highway Markets
Our Off-Highway business, which has become an increasingly more significant component of our
total operations over the past three years, accounted for about 20% of our first half 2008 sales.
Unlike our on-highway businesses, our Off-Highway business is larger outside of North America, with
more than 75% of its sales coming from outside North America. We serve several segments of the
diverse off-highway market, including construction, agriculture, mining, material handling and
others. Our largest markets are the European and North American construction and agriculture
markets. The European market for off-highway is expected to be up about 5% in 2008 versus 2007,
while the North American market is relatively flat compared to 2007.
Steel Costs
Another challenge we face is unprecedented levels of steel costs which are significantly
impacting our 2008 results of operations.
Two commonly used market-based indicators of steel prices the Tri Cities Scrap Index for #1
bundled scrap steel (which represents the monthly average costs in the Chicago, Cleveland and
Pittsburgh ferrous scrap markets, as posted by American Metal Market, and is used by our domestic
steel suppliers to determine our monthly surcharge) and the spot market price for hot-rolled sheet
steel illustrate the impact. After increasing significantly in 2004, the rates of increase for
scrap prices were more moderate during the past three years with the per ton price averaging
about $250 in 2005, $275 in 2006 and $310 in 2007. During 2008, however, the per ton prices
increased significantly averaging about $550 during this years first half and averaging close
to $700 during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Spot prices per ton for hot-rolled steel
followed a similar pattern averaging about $620 in 2005, $655 in 2006 and $595 in 2007 and
increased during this years first half to a six-month average of about $970 per ton with the three
months ended June 30, 2008 averaging about $1,150. At these levels, average scrap and hot-rolled
steel prices during the first half of 2008 are about 80% and 60% higher than the comparable spot
prices during the first half of 2007. Prices of scrap steel continued to rise during July
reaching $870 per ton, with hot-rolled steel prices being around $1,190 per ton. At present, we
are not expecting to see any significant reductions in steel prices during the remainder of this
year.
Higher steel cost is reflected directly in our purchases of various grades of raw steel as
well as indirectly through purchases of products such as castings, forgings and bearings. At
present, we purchase annually approximately 1.5 million tons of steel and products with significant
steel content. Agreements with certain customers either eliminate or mitigate our exposure to steel
cost increases, allowing us to effectively pass all or a portion of the cost on to our customers.
In certain cases, principally in our Structures business, we have resale arrangements whereby we
purchase the steel at the cost negotiated by our customers and include that cost in the pricing of
our products. In other arrangements, we have material price escalation provisions in customer
contracts providing for adjustments to unit prices based on commodity cost increases or decreases
over agreed reference periods. Adjustments under
54
these arrangements typically occur at quarterly, semi-annual and annual intervals with the
adjustment coming in the form of prospective price increases or decreases.
Historically, although not required by existing agreements, we also have been successful in
obtaining price increases or surcharges from certain customers as a result of escalating steel
costs. In total, we estimate that approximately 40 to 60% of the higher steel-related costs can be
recovered, although on a lag from the time we incur the higher cost. We are aggressively pursuing
additional recovery opportunities.
Given the different forms in which we purchase steel and products with steel content, it is
difficult to associate changes in steel cost with any one indicator. However, given our current
consumption levels, product mix, past experience with steel cost movements, and an assumed 40 to
60% expected recovery rate, we estimate that if market prices for scrap steel continue to average
around $850 per ton during the remainder of 2008 our cost of sales for 2008 will be adversely
impacted by approximately $100 to $150 as compared to 2007.
We also have taken actions to mitigate the impact of steel and other commodity increases by
consolidating purchases, contracting with new global steel sources, identifying alternative
materials and redesigning our products to be less dependent on higher cost steel grades.
Sales Outlook
Earlier this year, we expected our sales for the year to exceed $9,000. Based on the
magnitude of the lower production levels already in place in North America and the present market
outlook, we now expect our full year 2008 sales will be in the range of $8,600 to $8,800, as
compared to full year 2007 sales of $8,721. We expect that high fuel prices and other economic
factors currently having a negative impact on the light-duty and commercial truck markets in North
America will continue. For the first six months of 2008, markets outside North America were
relatively strong, partially offsetting the effects of a weaker North American market. During the
latter part of the second quarter, however, there were signs of developing weakness in the European
vehicle markets that could also negatively impact our performance during the second half of this
year.
Growing our sales through new business continues to be an important focus for us. Our current
backlog of awarded new business which comes on stream over the next two years more than offsets any
programs that are expiring or being co-sourced. While we continue to pursue vigorously new business
opportunities, we are doing so with measured discipline to ensure that such opportunities provide
acceptable investment returns.
55
Results of Operations Summary (Second Quarter 2008 versus Second Quarter 2007)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Realignment charges, net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before interest,
reorganization items and income taxes |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain reclassifications were made to conform 2007 to the 2008 presentation. |
Results of Operations (Second Quarter 2008 versus Second Quarter 2007)
Geographic Sales, Segment Sales and Gross Margin Analysis
The tables below show changes in our sales by geographic region, business unit and segment for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Geographical Sales Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Change Due To |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Organic |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Effects |
|
|
Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
(167 |
) |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
South America |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined sales of $2,333 in the second quarter of 2008 were $44 higher than the corresponding
period of 2007. The strengthening of major currencies against the U.S. dollar in international
markets where we conduct business increased sales by $141. Overall vehicle production levels and
market conditions outside the U.S. also contributed to higher sales. Partially offsetting the sales
increase from currency effects and stronger international markets, however, were lower sales due to
market weakness in North America.
The second quarter of 2008 organic sales decline of 14% in North America was driven primarily
by lower production in the light-duty and commercial vehicle markets.
Light-duty truck production
was down 22% in the second quarter of 2008 compared to a year ago. In the commercial vehicle
market, production of medium-duty (Class 5-7) trucks was down 9% compared to the second quarter of
2007. Partially offsetting the impact of lower vehicle production levels was the impact of higher
pricing and higher sales in the heavy-duty (Class 8) commercial vehicle market as compared to last
years second quarter when emission standards changes
contributed to low production levels of heavy-duty trucks.
56
Sales in Europe, exclusive of currency effects, increased 9%. Our Off-Highway business has a
strong presence in Europe and benefited from a stronger overall market compared to 2007 as well as
from new customer programs. Higher production levels in both the
light-duty and commercial vehicle
markets in Europe also contributed to higher sales in 2008 compared to last year. Higher vehicle
production levels also contributed to increased organic sales in South America and Asia Pacific.
Segment Sales Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Change Due To |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Organic |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Effects |
|
|
Change |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
Driveshaft |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Thermal |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Structures |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our ASG segments, after adjusting for currency effects, second quarter 2008 sales in the
aggregate were down $139. Each of the segments was adversely impacted by the effects of
significantly lower North American light and commercial vehicle truck production, including the
effects of a labor strike at a major automotive parts supplier which primarily impacted our
Structures and Light Axle businesses. Partially offsetting the weakness in the North American
markets were stronger production levels elsewhere in the world. Our Driveshaft business serves
both the light duty and commercial vehicle markets. Stronger vehicle markets outside North
America, stronger heavy-duty (Class 8) production in North America and some contributions from new
business more than offset the lower Driveshaft sales due to weaker
North American light- and medium-duty truck markets.
In HVSG, our Commercial Vehicle segment is heavily concentrated in the North American market.
Higher second quarter production of Class 8 trucks in North America compared to the same period in
2007 contributed to higher sales, as did somewhat stronger markets outside North America. Partially
offsetting the increased sales from these factors were lower production levels of medium duty
trucks in North America. With its significant European presence, our Off-Highway segments sales
benefited from the stronger euro, while organic sales in this segment benefited from stronger
production levels and sales from new programs.
57
Margin Analysis
The chart below shows our business unit and segment margin analysis for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
As a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
Gross margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASG |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Light Axle |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Structures |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASG |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Light Axle |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Structures |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Consolidated Gross Margin
Gross margin during the second quarter of 2008 was 5.4% of sales, down from 6.7% in 2007.
Margin has been adversely impacted by two significant factors higher steel cost and reduced
sales levels in North America, primarily in the light and medium-duty truck markets. Higher steel
costs reduced margin by approximately $38 (1.6% of 2008 second quarter sales). Adjusted for
currency effects, sales are down $97 from the second quarter of 2007 resulting in a lower sales
base to absorb certain fixed costs. Gross margins were also reduced by higher depreciation and
amortization expense of $8, in part a result of adoption of fresh start accounting. Partially
offsetting these adverse factors were benefits from the reorganization actions undertaken in
connection with the bankruptcy process labor cost savings, overhead cost reduction and
manufacturing footprint optimization. We did not begin benefiting significantly from non-union
employee benefit plan reductions and other labor savings until after the first quarter of 2007,
with much of the savings associated with the new union agreements not becoming effective until our
emergence on January 31, 2008. Labor cost savings associated with the reorganization initiatives
and other actions added approximately $29 to margins in the second quarter of 2008 while overhead
reduction, manufacturing footprint and increased pricing actions provided additional margin
improvement.
58
Automotive Systems Group Gross Margin
In ASG, gross margin improved to 6.7% of sales from 6.5% in the second quarter of 2007.
In the Light Axle segment, gross margin as a percent of sales was relatively comparable to 2007,
being down 0.1% from last year. Light Axle gross margin benefited by approximately $9 from labor
savings achieved through the bankruptcy reorganization process, while higher steel cost of about $6
adversely affected margin. Gross margin was adversely impacted by lower sales volume net of cost
reductions and other operational improvements. In the Driveshaft segment, gross margin as a
percent of sales improved by 0.1%. Labor savings associated with the bankruptcy reorganization
initiatives improved margins by about $11 and settlement of certain Canadian pension obligations
contributed another $4. Offsetting these benefits were higher steel cost of approximately $5 and
warranty cost of $4. Driveshaft gross margin was also negatively impacted by higher depreciation
expense of $8, in part due to the implementation of fresh start accounting upon emergence. In the
Sealing segment, the second quarter 2008 margins were generally comparable with last years second
quarter margin, being down 0.1%. Higher depreciation expense of $4, principally from adoption of
fresh start accounting, was partially offset by cost reductions. Thermal segment gross margin
declined 4.8% from 2007 principally due to settlement of a customer warranty obligation which
resulted in additional expense of $3 during the second quarter of 2008. The Structures segment
experienced gross margin reduction of 1.3%. Comparative margins were adversely affected by one-time
pricing settlement and cost recovery actions of $6 in the second quarter of 2007. Structures
margins were also negatively impacted by start-up costs associated with new program launches and by
lower sales volumes, in part due to disruptions caused by a labor strike at one of the major
automotive suppliers that curtailed vehicle production at General Motors. Partially offsetting
these negative factors was $8 of benefit from settlement of certain Canadian pension obligations,
$5 of labor savings resulting principally from our bankruptcy reorganization initiatives and $5 of
lower depreciation expense related to the adoption of fresh start accounting.
Heavy Vehicle Systems Group Gross Margin
Gross margin in HVSG was 8.1% in the second quarter of 2008, down from 9.1% in the second
quarter of 2007. Commercial Vehicle gross margin as a percent of sales was essentially flat.
Pricing improvement of $3 and reduced depreciation expense of $2 resulting from adoption of fresh
start accounting were partially offset by higher steel cost which reduced gross margin by $4. In
the Off-Highway segment, there was a margin decline of 2.0% of sales. Although sales increased $52
due to currency effects, the margin impact was negligible as the stronger international currencies
also affected our production costs, including a portion of those underlying sales denominated in
U.S. dollars. Also negatively impacting margins was higher steel cost of $10 and depreciation
increases of $2 related to fresh start accounting. Partially offsetting these adverse effects were
improved pricing of $5 and margin improvement from the higher sales volume.
Corporate & Other Gross Margin
Consolidated gross margin is impacted by cost of sales activity in Corporate & Other that is
not reflected in the operating segments. This activity consists principally of consolidated level
full absorption inventory adjustments which have the effect of reclassifying certain expenses to
cost of sales that are reported in the operating segments as SG&A. Additionally, the operating
segments report inventory and cost of sales on a FIFO basis, with
adjustments recorded in
consolidation to reflect the inventory and cost of sales of the U.S. operations on a LIFO basis.
During the second quarter of 2008, increases in the price of steel and other commodities resulted
in higher FIFO costs for our U.S. inventories. As a result, cost of sales within Corporate and
Other includes a charge of $26 to record the estimated impact on the corresponding LIFO reserve.
Adjustments to LIFO reserves in the second quarter of 2007 decreased cost of sales by $1.
59
Automotive Systems Group Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the ASG group during the second quarter of
2008 were 2.7% of sales, which compares favorably with the 2.9% of sales in the same period in
2007. The improvement apparent in Light Axle, Driveshaft and Structures reflects the labor and
overhead cost reduction initiatives implemented in connection with the bankruptcy reorganization
process as well as additional reductions implemented since January
2008. The Sealing and Thermal
businesses were not impacted as significantly by bankruptcy reorganization labor-related actions as
the other ASG segments. The increases in SG&A as a percent of sales in these businesses are
primarily a consequence of lower sales levels to absorb fixed expenses.
Heavy Vehicle Systems Group Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The HVSG group reduced selling, general and administrative expenses to 2.5% of sales in the
second quarter of 2008 from 3.1% in 2007. The businesses of this group benefited in a manner
similar to those in the ASG group from the bankruptcy-related cost reduction actions. This group
additionally benefited from certain fixed costs being absorbed over higher sales levels.
Corporate & Other Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The selling, general and administrative expenses at the Corporate & Other level were .9% of
sales in the second quarter of 2008 as compared to .8% of sales in last years second quarter.
While certain cost savings were achieved through the bankruptcy reorganization process, additional
expenses were incurred in connection with personnel changes and restoring long term incentive
plans.
Amortization of intangibles
Amortization of customer relationship intangibles recorded in connection with applying
fresh start accounting at the date of emergence resulted in expense of $19 for the three months
ended June 30, 2008.
Realignment charges and Impairment of goodwill
Realignment charges are primarily costs associated with the manufacturing footprint
optimization actions that were undertaken in connection with our bankruptcy plan of reorganization.
These actions are more fully described in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1
of Part I. We recorded additional realignment costs during the second quarter of 2008 in connection
with the planned closure of our foundry operation in Venezuela. During the second quarter of 2007,
we recorded $128 of cost relating to the settlement of our pension obligations in the United
Kingdom, which was completed in April 2007. The impairment of goodwill and the impairment of
intangible assets were recorded in the second quarter of 2008 and are discussed in Note 7 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Other income, net
Other income in 2008 includes net foreign currency transaction losses of $4, as compared
to net gains of $14 during the second quarter of 2007. DCC asset sales and other activity provided
income of $19 in 2007. With DCC assets having now been fully divested, there is no Other income
effect in 2008. Other income in 2007 also included a one-time claim settlement charge of $11
representing the estimated costs to settle a contractual matter with an investor in one of our
equity investments. Other income in 2008 also benefited from higher interest income of $5.
60
Interest expense
Interest expense includes the costs associated with the Exit Facility and other
debt agreements which are described in detail in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements
in Item 1 of Part I. Interest expense in the second quarter of 2008 includes $5 of amortized
Original issue discount (OID) recorded in connection with the Exit Facility and $2 of
amortized debt issuance costs. Interest expense in 2008 also includes $3 associated with the
accretion of certain liabilities that were recorded at discounted values to derive their fair
values in connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting upon emergence from bankruptcy.
During 2007, we recorded interest expense of $18 on our DIP Credit
Agreement. As a result of the
bankruptcy reorganization process, a substantial portion of our debt obligations were reported as
subject to compromise in our consolidated financial statements with no interest expense being
accrued on these obligations. The interest expense not recognized on these obligations amounted to
$27 in the second quarter of 2007.
Reorganization items, net
Reorganization items are expenses directly attributed to our Chapter 11 reorganization
process. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for
a summary of these costs. During the bankruptcy process, there were ongoing advisory fees of
professionals representing Dana and the other bankruptcy constituencies. Certain of these costs
continue subsequent to emergence as there are disputed claims which require resolution, claims
which require payment and other post-emergence activities incident to emergence from bankruptcy.
Among these ongoing costs are expenses associated with unionization of additional facilities under
the framework of the global agreement negotiated with the unions as part of our reorganization
activities.
Income tax benefit (expense)
In the U.S., the U.K. and certain other countries, our recent history of operating losses
does not allow us to satisfy the more likely than not criterion for realization of deferred tax assets. Consequently, there is no income tax benefit against the pre-tax losses of these jurisdictions as valuation allowances are established
to offset the associated tax benefit. These adjustments of the
valuation allowances and the impairment of $75 of goodwill in 2008 are the primary
factors which cause the tax expense of $12 and $3 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
to differ from the expected tax benefit of $44 and $38 at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%.
61
Results of Operations Summary (Year-to-Date 2008 versus Year-to-Date 2007)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,894 |
|
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realignment charges |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before interest, reorganization
items and income taxes |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh start accounting adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain reclassifications were made to conform 2007 to the 2008 presentation. |
As a consequence of emergence from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008, the results of
operations for the first half of 2008 separately present the month of January pre-emergence results
of Prior Dana and the five-month results of Dana. As such, the application of fresh start
accounting as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I is
reflected in the Dana five-month results, but not in the pre-emergence January results. Loss from
continuing operations before interest, reorganization items and
income taxes of $44 for the five
months ended June 30, 2008 includes net expenses of
approximately $57 resulting from the
application of fresh start accounting, primarily amortization of intangibles, a one-time
amortization of the stepped up value of inventories sold during the period and additional
depreciation expense. Additionally, certain agreements such as the labor agreements negotiated with
our major unions became effective upon emergence from bankruptcy. Consequently, certain benefits
associated with the effectiveness of these agreements, including the elimination of postretirement
medical costs in the U.S., commenced at emergence, thereby benefiting the five-month results of
Dana.
62
Results of Operations (Year-to-Date 2008 versus Year-to-Date 2007)
Geographic Sales, Segment Sales and Gross Margin Analysis
The tables below show changes in our sales by geographic region, business unit and
segment for the five months ended June 30, 2008, one month ended January 31, 2008 and six months
ended June 30, 2007.
Although the five months ended June 30, 2008 and one month ended January 31, 2008 are distinct
reporting periods as a consequence of our emergence from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008, the
emergence and fresh start accounting effects had negligible impact on the comparability of sales
between the periods. Accordingly, references in our analysis to six month sales information
combine the two periods in order to enhance the comparability of such information for the two six
month periods.
Geographical Sales Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
Europe |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
South America |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,894 |
|
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined sales of $4,645 in the first half of 2008 were $211 higher than the
corresponding period of 2007. The increase was driven by currency movements which generated $290 of
increased sales as a number of the major currencies in international markets where we conduct
business strengthened against the U.S. dollar. Exclusive of the currency effects, a weaker North
American market led to an overall market-related organic sales decline, more than offsetting
increases from stronger markets outside North America.
First half 2008 sales in North America adjusted for currency declined 11% due to lower
production in the light duty and commercial vehicle markets. Light duty truck production was down
17% in the first half of 2008 compared to a year ago. In the commercial vehicle market, production
of Class 8 and medium-duty (Class 5-7) trucks was 13% lower compared to the first half of 2007.
Partially offsetting the impact of lower vehicle production levels was the impact of higher
pricing, principally from our bankruptcy reorganization initiatives. While some of our
reorganization pricing actions benefited the first half of 2007, the first half of 2008 reflects
the full benefit from the pricing actions achieved over the course of 2007.
Sales in Europe, South America and Asia Pacific all benefited from the effects of
stronger local currencies against the U.S. dollar and somewhat higher year-over-year production
levels. The organic sales increase in Europe is also reflective of the significant presence our
Off-Highway segment has in this region. Off-Highway sales in Europe benefited from relatively
strong markets, new business and increased pricing.
63
Segment Sales Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Axle |
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Structures |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVSG |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,894 |
|
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our ASG segments, after adjusting for currency effects, first half 2008 sales in the
aggregate declined $126. The ASG segments were adversely impacted by the effects of significantly
lower North American light truck production as well as a labor strike at a major automotive parts
supplier which primarily impacted our Structures and Light Axle businesses and contributed to
reduced sales. Our Driveshaft sales to medium- and heavy-duty customers in the North American
commercial vehicle market also declined, but not as significantly as
the decline in light-duty.
Partially offsetting the weakness in the North American markets were stronger production levels
elsewhere in the world and benefits from the customer pricing improvement actions achieved in 2007.
This business benefited from some new customer programs, principally outside North America, which
have come on stream over the past year. The new Driveshaft business in combination with stronger
international markets more than offset the effects of lower North American production levels.
In HVSG, our Commercial Vehicle segment is heavily concentrated in the North American
market and the overall sales decline of 5% in this segment, after removing currency effects, was
primarily due to the drop in North American production levels discussed in the regional review.
Stronger markets outside North America and some pricing improvement partially offset the weaker
North American production. With its significant European presence, our Off-Highway segment
benefited from the stronger euro. Organic sales growth in this segment is the result of stronger
production levels and sales from new programs. We also benefited from increased pricing.
64
Margin Analysis
The chart below shows our business unit and segment margin analysis for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Sales |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASG |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Light Axle |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Structures |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASG |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Light Axle |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Driveshaft |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Sealing |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Structures |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HVSG |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Commercial Vehicle |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Off-Highway |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Consolidated
Gross margin as a percent of sales for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and the month of
January 2008 was 5.4% and 6.4%, respectively. This compares to gross margin of 5.7% for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. Margins during the five-month period ended June 30, 2008 have been
adversely impacted by two significant factors higher steel costs and reduced sales levels in
North America, primarily in the light- and medium-duty truck markets. Higher steel costs reduced
margin by approximately $42 (1.1% of sales). Adjusted for currency effects, sales in 2008 are down
from the comparable 2007 period, with most of the organic sales reduction occurring in the five
months ended June 30, 2008. As a result, there is a lower sales base relative to certain fixed
costs. Gross margins during the five months ended June 30, 2008 were also reduced by about $25
resulting from the fresh start accounting effects discussed in the subsequent paragraph. Partially
offsetting these adverse developments were benefits from the reorganization actions undertaken in
connection with the bankruptcy process customer pricing improvement, labor cost savings, overhead
cost reduction and manufacturing footprint optimization. The customer pricing actions began
contributing to gross margins in the first quarter of 2007, with additional pricing improvements
being achieved over the course of 2007. As a result, the first half of 2008 reflects a full six
months of customer pricing improvements while the first six months of 2007 includes only a portion
65
thereof. Pricing improvements unrelated to the reorganization process were also achieved, which
when combined with the reorganization related pricing actions increased margin by approximately
$31 during the five months ended June 30, 2008 and the month of January 2008. We did not begin
benefiting significantly from non-union employee benefit plan reductions and other labor savings
until the first quarter of 2008 with much of the savings associated with the agreements
negotiated with the unions only becoming effective upon our emergence on January 31, 2008. Labor
cost savings associated with the reorganization initiatives and other actions added approximately
$56 to margin in the first half of 2008, primarily in the five months ended June 30, 2008, while
overhead reduction, manufacturing footprint and increased pricing actions provided additional
margin improvement.
In connection with the application of fresh start accounting, margins were negatively
impacted by two factors. At emergence, inventory values were increased in accordance with fresh
start accounting requirements. Cost of sales recorded by our product segments for the five months
ended June 30, 2008 did not include the higher inventory value as the corresponding inventory was
sold, since the incremental charge was recorded in Corporate and Other and treated as a non-cash item.
Since our U.S. inventories are carried on LIFO, we recorded credits totaling $38 in Corporate and
Other in the five months ended June 30, 2008 to adjust our LIFO reserve and effectively retain the
higher inventory value of our U.S. inventories.. The other factor negatively impacting margins as a
result of fresh start accounting is higher depreciation expense on the stepped up value of fixed
assets and amortization expense associated with technology related intangibles recognized at
emergence. This higher depreciation and amortization expense reduced margin for the five months
ended June 30, 2008 by approximately $10.
Automotive Systems Group Gross Margin
In the Light Axle segment, gross margin as a percent of sales was 2.6% for the five
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2.7% for the month of January 2008, as compared to 1.5% for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. Customer pricing improvement and labor cost reductions contributed
approximately $25 (2.0% of sales) to 2008 margin. Other cost reductions and operational
improvements provided additional margin improvement. These improvements, however, were partially
offset by higher material costs which reduced margin by about $8 (0.6% of sales) and the margin
effects of reduced sales levels. Gross margin as a percent of sales in the Driveshaft segment was
8.4% for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and 10.2% for the month of January 2008 up from 7.2%
of sales for the first six months of 2007. Like the Light Axle segment, Driveshaft benefited
approximately $33 (4.8% of sales) from customer pricing actions and labor cost savings, primarily
from the reorganization actions. Margin for the five months ended June 30, 2008 also benefited by
$4 from settlement of certain Canadian pension liabilities during the second quarter of 2008.
Partially offsetting this benefit was higher material cost of $6 (0.9 % of sales), higher warranty
expense of $4, and reduced margin associated with the reduction in overall sales volume. Also
reducing margin in the Driveshaft segment was higher depreciation and amortization expense of $14
attributed primarily to the application of fresh start accounting. In the Sealing segment, gross
margin as a percent of sales for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and the month of January 2008
were relatively comparable with last years first half margins. The adverse effects on gross
margin from higher depreciation and amortization resulting from application of fresh start
accounting were offset by cost reductions and other operational performance improvement. Gross
margin in our Thermal segment declined to 5.4% of sales for the five months ended June 30, 2008
from 9.7% of sales in January 2008 and 9.8% of sales for the first six months of 2007. Additional
warranty cost of $3 in the second quarter of 2008 contributed to the reduced margin as did higher
depreciation and amortiziation. The Structures segment achieved gross margin of 6.9% for the five
months ended June 30, 2008, 1.2% of sales for the month of January 2008 and 6.2% of sales for the
first six months of 2007. Labor savings, principally from the reorganization initiatives, improved
margin by about $9 (1.7% of sales), with settlement of certain Canadian pension liabilities in the
second quarter of 2008 providing an additional benefit of $8.The Structures segment also benefited
by $9 from reduced depreciation and amortization expense resulting primarily from application of
fresh start accounting. These benefits were partially offset by $11 of one-time pricing actions or
cost recoveries received from customers in 2007 along with the adverse margin effects attributable
to lower sales levels during the first six months of 2008.
Heavy Vehicle Systems Group Gross Margin
Gross margin in the Commercial Vehicle segment was 5.8% of sales for the five months
ended June 30, 2008 and 4.5% of sales for the month of January 2008, which compares to 5.3% of
sales for first half of 2007. Gross margin in 2008 benefited by about $9 from improved pricing and
labor savings, principally
66
in the five months ended June 30, 2008. Partially offsetting the margin
improvement was higher material costs of $5 during the five months
ended June 30, 2008 and the
adverse effects of lower sales levels during 2008. In the Off-Highway segment, gross margin as a
percent of sales of 10.0% for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and 10.5% for the month of
January 2008 were down slightly from gross margin of 11.9% of
sales in the first half of 2007. The
margin decline is primarily due to higher material costs of $10 (1.0% of sales in the five months
ended June 30, 2008), with the benefit of higher sales levels in 2008 providing a partial offset.
Corporate & Other Gross margin
Consolidated gross margin is impacted by cost of sales activity in Corporate & Other that is
not reflected in the operating segments. This activity consists principally of consolidated level
full absorption inventory adjustments which have the effect of reclassifying certain expenses to
cost of sales that are reported in the operating segments as SG&A. Additionally, the operating
segments report inventory and cost of sales on a FIFO basis, with adjustments made in consolidation
to reflect the inventory and cost of sales of the U.S. operations on a LIFO basis. During the first
half of 2008, a portion of the increased steel and other costs capitalized as part of the FIFO
inventory by the operating segments was recognized in cost of sales at the consolidated level to
adjust to LIFO. The aggregate LIFO adjustment in the five months ended June 30, 2008 was $29, with
a pickup of $3 recognized in the month of January 2008. During the first half of 2007, LIFO charges
to cost of sales amounted to $15. The aforementioned $15 charge to cost of sales to recognize the
stepped up fresh start value of inventory sold during the five months ended June 30, 2008 was also
recognized in Corporate & Other.
Automotive Systems Group Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the ASG group during the five months ended
June 30, 2008 were 2.7% of sales with the month of January 2008 being 3.7% of sales. During the
first six months of 2007, selling, general and administrative expenses were 3.1% of sales. The
improvement reflected in Light Axle, Driveshaft and Structures reflect the labor and overhead cost
reduction initiatives implemented in connection with the bankruptcy reorganization process as well
as additional reductions implemented post-emergence. The Sealing and Thermal businesses were not
impacted as significantly as the other ASG segments by bankruptcy reorganization labor-related
actions.
Heavy Vehicle Systems Group Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The HVSG group reduced selling, general and administrative expenses to 2.6% of sales in the
five months ended June 30, 2008 and 2.8% of sales in the month of January 2008 from 3.2% in 2007.
The businesses of this group benefited similarly to those in the ASG group from the bankruptcy
related cost reduction actions. The Off-Highway segment additionally benefited from higher sales
levels being spread over certain fixed costs
Corporate & Other Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The selling, general and administrative expenses at the Corporate & Other level were 1.1% of
sales for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and the month of January 2008 as compared to 1.0% of
sales during the first six months of 2007. While certain cost savings were achieved through the
bankruptcy reorganization process, additional expenses were incurred during 2008 in connection with
personnel changes and restoring long term incentive plans. Also adversely impacting the year over
year margin comparison was a reduction in long-term disability accruals in 2007.
Amortization of intangibles
Amortization of customer relationship intangibles recorded in connection with applying
fresh start accounting at the date of emergence resulted in expense of $31 for the five months
ended June 30, 2008.
Realignment charges and Impairment of goodwill
Realignment charges are primarily costs associated with the manufacturing footprint
optimization actions that were undertaken in connection with our bankruptcy plan of reorganization.
These actions are more fully described in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1
of Part I. We recorded
67
additional realignment costs during the second quarter of 2008 for the
closure of our foundry operation in Venezuela. The first half of 2007 also includes $136 of cost
relating to the settlement of our pension obligations in the United Kingdom, which was completed in
April 2007. The impairment of goodwill and the impairment of intangible assets are discussed in
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Other income, net
Net currency transaction gains provided other income of $11 in the five months ended June
30, 2008 and $3 in the month of January 2008, as compared to $19 of net currency transaction gains
in the first half of 2007. DCC asset sales were substantially completed in 2007. These sales and
other DCC activity provided income of $25 in the first half of 2007, while in 2008 such activity resulted
in a net loss of $1 in the month of January. Other income in 2007 also included a one-time claim
settlement charge of $11 representing the cost to settle a contractual matter with an
investor in one of our equity investments. Other income in 2008 also benefited from higher
interest income of $12.
Interest expense
Interest expense of Dana reflects the costs associated with the Exit Financing facility
and other debt agreements which are described in detail in Note 14 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 1 of Part I. Interest expense in the five months ended June 30, 2008 includes $8
of amortized OID recorded in connection with the Exit Financing facility and $3 of amortized debt
issuance costs.
Interest expense in the five months ended June 30, 2008 also includes $1 associated with the
accretion of certain liabilities that were recorded at discounted values in connection with the
adoption of fresh start accounting upon emergence from bankruptcy. During 2007 and the month of
January 2008, as a result of the bankruptcy reorganization process, a substantial portion of our
debt obligations were reported as Liabilities subject to compromise in our consolidated financial
statements with no interest expense being accrued on these obligations. The interest expense not
recognized on these obligations amounted to $54 in the first half of 2007 and $9 during the month
of January 2008.
Reorganization items, net
Reorganization items are expenses directly attributed to our Chapter 11 reorganization
process. See Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for a summary of
these costs. During the bankruptcy process, there were ongoing advisory fees of professionals
representing Dana and the other bankruptcy constituencies. Certain of these costs continue
subsequent to emergence as there are disputed claims which require resolution, claims which require
payment and other post-emergence activities incident to emergence from bankruptcy. Among these
ongoing costs are expenses associated with additional facility unionization under the framework of
the global agreements negotiated with the unions as part of our reorganization activities.
Reorganization items in the month of January 2008 include a gain on the settlement of Liabilities
subject to compromise and several one-time emergence costs, including the cost of employee stock
bonuses, transfer taxes, and success fees and other fees earned by certain professionals upon
emergence.
Income tax benefit (expense)
In the U.S., the U.K. and certain other countries, our recent history of operating losses
does not allow us to satisfy the more likely than not criterion for realization of deferred tax assets. Consequently, there is no income tax benefit against the pre-tax losses of these jurisdictions as valuation allowances are
established offsetting the associated tax benefit or expense. In the
U.S., as described in Note 18 to our financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report,
because of the significant amount of OCI reported for the five months ended June 30, 2008 and the
six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized a U.S. tax benefit
of $14 and $26 in continuing
operations. The valuation allowance impacts in the above-mentioned countries, the fresh start
adjustments in 2008 and the impairment of $75 of goodwill in 2008 are the primary factors which
cause the tax expense of $32 for the five months ended June 30, 2008, $199 for the month of January
2008, and $18 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to differ from an expected tax benefit of $44,
tax expense of $320 and tax benefit of $47 for those periods, respectively, at the U.S. federal
statutory rate of 35%.
68
Discontinued operations
Our engine hard parts, fluid products and pump products operations had been reported as
discontinued operations. The sales of these businesses were substantially completed in 2007, except
for a portion of the pump products business that was sold in January 2008. The first half 2007
results reflect the operating results of these businesses as well as adjustments to the net assets
of these businesses necessary to reflect their fair value less cost to sell based on expected sales
proceeds.
The net sales and the loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, aggregated by operating segment, are shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Sales |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engine |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
Fluid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Pump |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Net loss |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engine |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
Fluid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Pump |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ASG |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Discontinued
Operations |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net loss in Engine in the first half of 2007 includes a net loss of $26 recorded in
connection with the sale of this business which was completed in March 2007. The net loss in Engine
in the first half of 2008 reflects post-closing adjustments associated with the sale, including $4
in the month of January 2008 to properly account for liabilities retained by Dana.
Liquidity
Our global liquidity as of June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits supporting obligations |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Cash in less than wholly-owned subsidiaries |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Available cash |
|
|
1,031 |
|
Additional cash availability from: |
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit in the U.S. and Europe |
|
|
575 |
|
Additional lines of credit supported by letters of
credit from the revolving facility |
|
|
40 |
|
Total global liquidity |
|
$ |
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
69
We believe our overall liquidity and operating cash
flows will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated cash requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, debt obligations and other
commitments for the foreseeable future. Satisfying our debt covenants in the future could
require the use of a portion of our available cash to reduce debt.
A summary of the changes in cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 is shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flow summary: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange and discontinued operations |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of inventory valuation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing charges and original issue discount |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash portion of U.K. pension charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Reorganization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of claims |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items net of cash payments |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Fresh start adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments to VEBAs |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of businesses and assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Change in working capital |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(122 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash of $973 was
used in operating activities in the first half of 2008 as compared to cash of
$152 used in the same period of 2007. During the first half of 2008, cash was used to satisfy
various obligations associated with our emergence from bankruptcy. Cash of $733 was used shortly
after emergence to satisfy our payment obligation to two VEBAs established to fund non-pension
benefits of union retirees. A payment of $53 occurred at emergence to satisfy our obligation to a
similar VEBA established to fund non-pension benefits relating to non-union retirees, with a
payment of $2 being made under another union arrangement. Additional
bankruptcy emergence-related
payments during the five months ended June 30, 2008 approximated $97 for payment of claims, professional fees,
transfer taxes and other reorganization related items.
70
We typically experience an increase in working capital during the first half of the year due
primarily to trade receivables being customarily lower at the end of the calendar year as our OEM
customers production levels are lighter during the holiday
season. Cash of $128 was used during
the first half of 2008 to fund working capital requirements, as compared to a use of $64 in the
first half of 2007.
Cash
required to fund increased accounts receivable in 2008 was $199, which compares to a use
of $223 during the first six months of 2007. Increased inventory levels consumed approximately $56
of cash in the first half of 2008 while requiring $20 during the same period of the prior year. The
increase was due in part to higher material costs. Partially offsetting the use of cash for
accounts receivable and inventory were increased levels of accounts payable and other working
capital components which in the aggregate provided a cash source of
$127 in 2008 and $179 in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash from investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures of the engine hard parts, fluid products and trailer axle businesses, the sale of
our investment in GETRAG and proceeds from DCC divestment-related actions provided cash of $421 in
the first half of 2007. Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were comparable with last
year. DCC cash that was restricted during bankruptcy by a forbearance agreement with DCC
noteholders was released in January 2008 as payments were made to the noteholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana |
|
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
Prior Dana |
|
|
|
Five Months |
|
|
|
One Month |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash from financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
Proceeds from (repayment of) debtor-in-possession facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
Proceeds from Exit Facility debt |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Original issue discount and deferred financing fees |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Exit Facility debt |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of DCC Medium Term Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series A and Series B preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
$ |
912 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At emergence from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008, we obtained proceeds of $1,350 under a new
Exit Facility and $771 of proceeds through the issuance of Series A and Series B shares of
preferred stock. These proceeds were used in part to repay the $900 outstanding under the DIP
Credit Agreement, pay Exit Facility OID costs and fees of $154, and retire the remaining amount
owed to DCC noteholders through satisfaction of DCCs bankruptcy claim against Prior Dana.
Post-emergence, additional proceeds of $80 were received under the Exit Facility. During the first
half of 2007, we borrowed an additional $200 under the DIP Credit Agreement.
71
Financing Activities
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash deposits are maintained to provide credit enhancement for certain agreements. These
deposits are recorded as Cash and cash equivalents. In most instances, these cash deposits may be
withdrawn if comparable security is provided in the form of letters of credit.
At June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents held in the U.S. amounted to $548. Included in
this amount was $71 of cash deposits maintained primarily to provide credit enhancement for certain lease
agreements, support surety bonds that enable us to self-insure our workers compensation
obligations in certain states and fund an escrow account required to appeal a judgment rendered in
Texas. Cash of $6 held by DCC is no longer restricted as the obligations under a forbearance agreement
were satisfied in January 2008.
At June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents held outside the U.S. amounted to $643. Included
in this
amount was $26 of cash deposits maintained primarily to provide credit enhancement for certain lease
agreements and to support letters of credit, bank guarantees and certain employee benefit
obligations.
Our cash deposits are not considered to be restricted as they could be replaced by letters of
credit available under our Exit Facility (discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 1 of Part I).
A substantial portion of our non-U.S. cash and cash equivalents is needed for working capital
and other operating purposes. Several countries have local regulatory requirements that
significantly restrict the ability of our operations to repatriate this cash. In addition, at June
30, 2008, $63 was held by consolidated entities that have minority interests with varying levels of
participation rights involving cash withdrawals. Beyond these restrictions, there are practical
limitations on repatriation of cash from certain countries because of the resulting tax cost.
Intercompany Loans
Certain of our international operations had intercompany loan obligations to the U.S. totaling
$247 at June 30, 2008. These intercompany loans resulted (i) from certain international operations
having received cash or other forms of financial support from the U.S. to finance their activities
and (ii) from U.S. entities transferring their ownership in certain entities in exchange for
intercompany notes. Intercompany loans of $162 are denominated in a foreign currency and not
considered permanently invested as they are expected to be repaid in the near term. Accordingly,
foreign exchange gains and losses on these loans are reported in other income (expense) rather than
being recorded in Other comprehensive income (loss) as translation gain or loss.
Credit Agreements
Exit Financing
On the Effective Date, Dana, as Borrower, and certain of our domestic subsidiaries, as
guarantors, entered into the Exit Facility with Citicorp USA, Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Barclays Capital. The Exit Facility consists of the Term Facility in the total aggregate amount of
$1,430 and the $650 Revolving Facility. The Term Facility was fully drawn with borrowings of $1,350
on the Effective Date and $80 on February 1, 2008. Net proceeds were $1,276 after $114 of OID and
other customary issuance costs and fees of $40, both of which were
deferred and are being amortized
as interest expense over the term of the loan. There were no borrowings under the Revolving
Facility at the Effective Date, but $200 was utilized for existing letters of credit. For an
explanation of the terms of the Exit Facility, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements
in Item 8 of our 2007 Form 10-K.
At June 30, 2008, we had gross borrowings of $1,423 (before reduction of $107 for unamortized
OID) under the Term Facility and although we had no borrowings under the Revolving Facility, we had
utilized $192 for letters of credit. Based on our borrowing base collateral, we had availability at
that date under the Revolving Facility of $383 after deducting the outstanding letters of credit.
Through June 30, 2008 we are in full compliance with our debt covenants and expect to continue
to remain in compliance through year end and into 2009. Satisfying
the debt covenants in the future could require the use of a portion of available cash to
reduce debt.
72
Interest Rate Agreements
Interest on the Term Facility accrues at variable interest rates. Under the Term Facility we
are required to carry interest rate hedge agreements covering a notional amount of not less than
50% of the aggregate loans outstanding under the Term Facility for a period of no less than three
years. We paid $1 in May 2008 to enter into a series of contracts that effectively cap the LIBOR component of the
interest rate calculation for our Term Facility at 6.00% and our effective interest rate at 9.75%
through May 2011 on a notional amount of $713 of the Term Facility (reducing in quarterly steps to
$694 in February 2011). The contracts are adjusted to their fair
value monthly. The $2 fair value of the contracts as of June 30, 2008 is recorded as an asset.
DIP Credit Agreement
Prior Dana, as borrower, and its Debtor subsidiaries, as guarantors, were parties to the DIP
Credit
Agreement that was initially approved by the Bankruptcy Court in March 2006. Under the DIP Credit
Agreement, we had a $650 revolving credit facility and a $900 term loan facility at December 31,
2007. For a discussion of the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement, see Note 10 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 of our 2007 Form 10-K.
At December 31, 2007, we had borrowed $900 under the DIP Credit Agreement. All of the loans
and other obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement were repaid as part of the consummation of the
Plan, primarily from the funding obtained from the Exit Facility. Outstanding letters of credit
issued under the DIP Credit Agreement were transferred to the Exit Facility on January 31, 2008.
European Receivables Loan Facility
In July 2007, certain of our European subsidiaries entered into definitive agreements to
establish an accounts receivable securitization program. The agreements include a Receivable Loan
Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with GE Leveraged Loans Limited (GE) that provides for a five-year
accounts receivable securitization facility under which up to the euro equivalent of $225 in
financing is available to those European subsidiaries (collectively, the Sellers) subject to the
availability of adequate levels of accounts receivable. For a discussion of this facility and the
receivables program, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of our 2007
Form 10-K. At June 30, 2008, there was availability of $192 and there were borrowings under this
facility equivalent to $19 recorded as Notes payable. The proceeds from the borrowings are used for
operations and for the repayment of intercompany debt.
Canadian Credit Agreement
In June 2006, Dana Canada Corporation (Dana Canada), as borrower, and certain of its Canadian
affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement (the Canadian Credit Agreement) with
Citibank Canada, as agent, initial lender and an issuing bank, and with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Toronto Branch, and Bank of America, N.A., Canada Branch, as initial lenders and issuing banks. The
Canadian Credit Agreement provided for a $100 revolving credit facility, of which $5 was available
for the issuance of letters of credit. At January 31, 2008, less than $1 of the facility was being
utilized for the letters of credit and there had been no borrowings over the life of this
agreement. The Canadian Credit Agreement was terminated upon our emergence from bankruptcy.
DCC Notes
See Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 of Part I for information about DCCs
repayment of outstanding notes.
73
Cash Obligations
We are obligated to make future cash payments in fixed amounts under various agreements. These
include payments under our long-term debt agreements, rent payments under operating lease
agreements and payments for equipment, other fixed assets and certain raw materials under purchase
agreements. In the first half of 2008, there were no significant changes in the cash obligations
reported in Item 7 of our 2007 Form 10-K except for the change in the obligations under our new
debt facilities. Our DIP loan of $900 was repaid on January 31, 2008, and on January 31 and
February 1, 2008 we took on the new long-term debt obligation shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
4 -5 |
|
|
After |
|
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Principal of long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
Interest
payments (1) |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Notes
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts represent future interest payments on the Term Loan debt balances at June
30, 2008. Payments related to the Term Loans variable rate debt tranches are based on the
June 30, 2008 interest rates. However, as described in our 2007 Form 10-K, there is an
interest rate floor on our Exit Facility which expires on January 31, 2010. The rate in
the table is at the 3% floor plus the applicable margin until January 31, 2010, then drops
22 basis points to the June 30, 2008 rate in the remaining periods. |
Contingencies
Impact of Our Bankruptcy Filing
During our Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, most actions against the Debtors relating to
pre-petition liabilities were automatically stayed. Substantially all of our pre-petition
liabilities were addressed under the Plan. Our emergence from bankruptcy resolved certain of our
contingencies as discussed below.
During January 2008, both an Ad Hoc Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants as well as
an asbestos claimant, Jose Angel Valdez, filed notices of appeal of the Confirmation Order. During
February 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated
the two appeals. Prior Dana and the other post-emergence Debtors filed with the District Court (i)
a motion to dismiss the consolidated appeal and (ii) a brief in support of the motion to dismiss
and on the merits of the consolidated appeal. The consolidated appeal and the motion to dismiss are
currently pending before the District Court, with oral arguments yet to be scheduled.
Class Action Lawsuit and Derivative Actions
A securities class action entitled Howard Frank v. Michael J. Burns and Robert C. Richter was
originally filed in October 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio,
naming our former Chief Executive Officer, Michael J. Burns, and former Chief Financial Officer,
Robert C. Richter, as defendants. In a consolidated complaint filed in August 2006, lead plaintiffs
alleged violations of the U.S. securities laws and claimed that the price at which our stock traded
at various times between April 2004 and October 2005 was artificially inflated as a result of the
defendants alleged wrongdoing. In June 2007, the District Court denied lead plaintiffs motion for
an order partially lifting the statutory discovery stay which would have enabled them to obtain
copies of certain documents produced to the SEC. By order dated August 21, 2007, the District Court
granted the defendants motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint and entered a judgment closing
the case. In September 2007, the lead plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the District Courts
order and judgment. As of the date hereof, the appeal has been fully briefed. Oral argument has not
been scheduled.
A stockholder derivative action entitled Roberta Casden v. Michael J. Burns, et al., was
originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in March 2006. An
amended complaint filed in August 2006 added alleged non-derivative class claims on behalf of
holders of our stock alleging, among other things, that the defendants (our former Board of
Directors, former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer) had breached their
fiduciary duties and acted in bad faith in determining to file for protection under the Bankruptcy
Laws. These alleged non-derivative class claims are not asserted
74
against Dana. In June 2006, the
District Court stayed the derivative claims, deferring to the Bankruptcy Court on those claims. In
July 2007, the District Court dismissed the non-derivative class claims asserted in the amended
complaint and entered a judgment closing the case. In August 2007, the plaintiff filed a notice of
appeal from the District Courts order and judgment. As of the date hereof, the appeal has been
fully briefed. Oral argument has not been scheduled.
SEC Investigation
In September 2005, we reported that management was investigating accounting matters arising
out of incorrect entries related to a customer agreement in our Commercial Vehicle operations, and
that the Prior Dana Audit Committee had engaged outside counsel to conduct an independent
investigation of
these matters as well. Outside counsel informed the SEC of the investigation, which ended in
December 2005, the same month that we filed restated financial statements for the first two
quarters of 2005 and the years 2002 through 2004. In January 2006, we learned that the SEC had
issued a formal order of investigation with respect to matters related to our restatements. The
SECs investigation is a non-public, fact-finding inquiry to determine whether any violations of
the law have occurred. We are continuing to cooperate fully with the SEC in the investigation.
Legal Proceedings Arising in the Ordinary Course of Business
We are a party to various pending judicial and administrative proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. These include, among others, proceedings based on product liability
claims and alleged violations of environmental laws. We have reviewed these pending legal
proceedings, including the probable outcomes, our reasonably anticipated costs and expenses, the
availability and limits of our insurance coverage and surety bonds and our established reserves for
uninsured liabilities.
Further information about some of these legal proceedings follows, including information about
our accruals for the liabilities that may arise from such proceedings. We accrue for contingent
liabilities at the time when we believe they are both probable and estimable. We review our
assessments of probability and estimability as new information becomes available and adjust our
accruals quarterly, if appropriate. Since we do not accrue for contingent liabilities that we
believe are probable unless we can reasonably estimate the amounts of such liabilities, our actual
liabilities may exceed the amounts we have recorded. We do not believe that any liabilities that
may result from these proceedings are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity or financial condition.
Asbestos Personal Injury Liabilities
We had approximately 42,000 active pending asbestos personal injury liability claims at June
30, 2008, which is generally unchanged from the number of claims pending at December 31, 2007,
including approximately 10,000 claims that were settled but awaiting final documentation and
payment. In connection with applying fresh start accounting, we assigned probabilities to the
values underlying the estimated range of future asbestos indemnity and defense costs included in
the December 31, 2007 actuarial valuation obtained to estimate our liability associated with these
obligations. The related cash flows were probability weighted and discounted to determine the fair
value as of January 31, 2008. As a result, we had accrued $145 for indemnity and defense costs for
pending and future asbestos personal injury liability claims at June 30, 2008. Our policy before
the adoption of fresh start accounting had been to accrue the undiscounted low end of the range of
projected obligations, which had resulted in an accrual of $136 at December 31, 2007.
Prior to 2006, we had
reached agreements with some of our insurers to commute policies
covering asbestos personal injury claims. We apply proceeds from insurance commutations first to
reduce any recorded recoverable amount related to that insurer. Proceeds from commutations in excess of our estimated
recoverable amount for pending and future claims are recorded as a credit to other income.
Commutation proceeds of $2 were credited to other income in the five months ended June 30, 2008.
At June 30, 2008, we had recorded $73 as an asset for probable recovery from our insurers for
the pending and projected asbestos personal injury liability claims, compared to $69 recorded at
December 31, 2007. The June 30 amount was also discounted using the same methodology as the
associated liability. The recorded asset reflects our assessment of the capacity of our current
insurance agreements to provide for the payment of anticipated defense and indemnity costs for
pending claims and
75
projected future demands. These recoveries take into account elections to extend
existing coverage which we exercised in order to maximize our insurance recovery. The recorded
asset does not represent the limits of our insurance coverage, but rather the amount we would
expect to recover if we paid the accrued indemnity and defense costs.
In addition, we had a net amount receivable from our insurers and others of $18 at June 30,
2008, compared to $17 at December 31, 2007. The receivable represents reimbursements for settled
asbestos personal injury liability claims, including billings in progress and amounts subject to
alternate dispute resolution proceedings with some of our insurers. It is anticipated that a
favorable settlement to these proceedings will be finalized soon.
As part of our reorganization, assets and liabilities associated with asbestos claims were
retained in Prior Dana which was then merged into Dana Companies, LLC, a consolidated wholly owned
subsidiary of Dana. The assets of Dana Companies, LLC include insurance rights relating to coverage
against these liabilities and other assets which we believe are sufficient to satisfy its
liabilities. Dana Companies, LLC continues to process asbestos personal injury claims in the normal
course of business, is separately managed and has an independent board member. The independent
board member is required to approve certain transactions including dividends or other transfers of
$1 or more of value to Dana.
Other Product Liabilities
We had accrued $4 for non-asbestos product liability costs at June 30, 2008, unchanged from
the liability at December 31, 2007, with no recovery expected from third parties at either date. We
estimate these liabilities based on assumptions about the value of the claims and about the
likelihood of recoveries against us derived from our historical experience and current information.
Environmental Liabilities
Accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2008 were $20, compared to $180 at December 31,
2007. The reduction is attributable to the discharge of underlying environmental claims upon
emergence. A portion of these claims is being addressed through the disputed claims process
described in the Emergence from Reorganization Proceedings section of Item 1 of Part I. As such,
the resolution of these matters will not have an impact on our post-emergence financial condition
or results of operations.
We considered the most probable method of remediation, current laws and regulations and
existing technology in determining the fair value of our remaining environmental liabilities as of
January 31, 2008 and the accrued liability at June 30, 2008.
One of the larger claims at emergence was a claim involving the Hamilton Avenue Industrial
Park (Hamilton) site in New Jersey. We are a potentially responsible party at this site (also known
as the Cornell Dubilier Electronics or CDE site) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). This matter has been the subject of an estimation
proceeding as a result of our objection to a claim filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and other federal agencies (collectively, the Government) in connection with this and
several other CERCLA sites. During the course of the proceedings and our efforts to address the
Governments claim, no additional information was provided to support any adjustment to the amounts
we had accrued for this matter. For the past several months, we have been actively litigating the
claim and negotiating a settlement with the Government on the Hamilton site as well as other
environmental claims. We reached tentative agreement with the Government in April 2008 providing
for an allowed general unsecured claim of $126, which will be settled by distribution of shares
from the disputed claims reserve. The mandatory public comment period is now underway. If no
comments are received, the settlement will be referred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York for approval. At December 31, 2007, we had concluded there was a probable
settlement outcome and adjusted the December 2007 liability to the tentative $126 settlement
amount.
Other Liabilities Related to Asbestos Claims
After the Center for Claims Resolution (CCR) discontinued negotiating shared settlements for
asbestos claims for its member companies in 2001, some former CCR members defaulted on the payment
of their shares of some settlements and some settling claimants sought payment of the unpaid shares
from other members of the CCR at the time of the settlements, including from us. We have been
76
working with the CCR, other former CCR members, our insurers and the claimants over a period of
several years in an effort to resolve these issues. Through June 30, 2008, we had paid $47 to
claimants and collected $37 with respect to these claims. At June 30, 2008, we had a receivable of
$10 that we expect to recover from available insurance and surety bonds relating to these claims.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Except as discussed below, our critical accounting estimates for purposes of the financial
statements in this report are the same as those discussed in Item 7 of our 2007 Form 10-K.
Tax Rates
For purposes of preparing our interim financial statements, we utilize an estimated annual
effective tax rate for ordinary items that is reevaluated each period based on changes in the
components used to determine the annual effective rate.
Retiree Benefits
We use several key assumptions to determine our plan expenses and obligations for our defined
benefit retirement programs. These key assumptions include the interest rate used to discount the
obligations, the long-term estimated rate of return on plan assets and the health care cost trend
rates. Changes in one or more of the underlying assumptions could result in a material impact to
our consolidated financial statements in any given period. If actual experience differs from
expectations, our financial position and results of operations in future periods could be affected.
Restructuring actions involving facility closures and employee downsizing and divestitures
frequently give rise to adjustments to employee benefit plan obligations, including the recognition
of curtailment or settlement gains and losses. Upon the occurrence of these events, the obligations
of the employee benefit plans affected by the action are re-measured based on updated assumptions
as of the re-measurement date.
Certain changes to our U.S. defined benefit retirement programs were implemented during the
bankruptcy process. Other changes specific to union-represented employees became effective on
January 31, 2008 with our emergence from bankruptcy. Our postretirement healthcare obligations for
all U.S. employees and retirees have been eliminated. With regard to pension benefits, credited
service and benefit accruals have been frozen for all U.S. employees in defined benefit pension
plans.
In connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting upon emergence, we were required to
re-measure the assets and liabilities of all of our defined benefit plans using updated
assumptions. See additional discussion of our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations
in Note 11 to the financial statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Long-lived Asset and Goodwill Impairment
We perform periodic impairment analyses on our long-lived assets whenever events and
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. When such
indications are present, we compare the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows of the
operations to which the assets relate to their carrying amount. If the operations are determined to
be unable to recover the carrying amount of their assets, the long-lived assets are written down to
their estimated fair value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, third party
appraisals or other methods that provide appropriate estimates of value.
Asset impairments often result from significant actions like the discontinuance of customer
programs and facility closures. During our reorganization several initiatives including customer
program evaluations and manufacturing footprint assessments caused us to recognize asset
impairments. Future decisions in connection with these types of actions or new actions could result
in additional asset impairment losses in the future.
77
As
discussed previously, goodwill, other intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment were recorded
at their estimated fair value as of January 31, 2008 as a result of fresh start
accounting. These fair valuations generally resulted in increases to the previous carrying amounts.
Estimating fair values requires making assumptions regarding future sales volumes and pricing,
capital expenditures, useful lives and salvage values of related fixed assets, our ability to
develop and implement productivity improvements, discount rates, effective tax rates, market
multiples, and other items.
The
Driveshaft segment in the ASG group was tested for impairment in the
second quarter of 2008 due to adverse conditions in the automotive
market. Lower production volumes and higher costs contributed to
lower than expected operating profits and cash flows for this
business. Based on the significant cuts to production schedules of
major U.S. customers and the declining sales of the pick-up and SUV
platforms on which we have significant driveshaft content, our
earnings outlook for this business has declined.
Based
on our revised outlook, the fair value of the Driveshaft segment, as
determined using the estimated present value of future cash flows,
did not support the recorded goodwill. Accordingly, our second
quarter 2008 results include a goodwill impairment charge of $75 to
write down the goodwill in this segment.
Any
further indications that the carrying amounts of our tangible and
intangible assets may not be recoverable could cause us to reassess
the fair values of our business units. This could cause additional
impairment of the assets of these segments, which could materially
impact our future results of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various types of market risks, including fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, adverse movements in commodity prices for products we use in our manufacturing and
adverse changes in interest rates. To reduce our exposure to these risks, we maintain risk
management controls to monitor these risks and take appropriate actions to attempt to mitigate such
risks. There have been no material changes to the market risk exposures discussed in Item 7A of our
2007 Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the
information disclosed in the reports we file with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, with participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end period covered by this Report on Form 10-Q. Our
CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report on Form 10-Q,
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
CEO and CFO Certifications
The Certifications of our CEO and CFO that are attached to this report as Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2 include information about our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting. These Certifications should be read in conjunction with the information
contained in this Item 4 and in Item 9A of our 2007 Form 10-K for a more complete understanding of
the matters covered by the Certifications.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As discussed in Item 2 of Part I, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Emergence Proceedings, and in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 1 of Part I, we emerged from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008. Pursuant
to the Plan, the pre-petition ownership interests in Prior Dana were cancelled and all of the
pre-petition claims against the Debtors, including claims with respect to debt, pension and
postretirement healthcare obligations and other liabilities, were addressed in connection with our
emergence from bankruptcy.
78
As previously reported and as discussed in Item 2 of Part I and in Note 16 to the financial
statements in Item 1 of Part I, we are a party to a pending stockholder derivative action, as well
as various pending judicial and administrative proceedings that arose in the ordinary course of
business (including both pre-petition and subsequent proceedings), we are cooperating with a formal
investigation by the SEC with respect to matters related to the restatement of our financial
statements for the first two quarters of 2005 and fiscal years 2002 through 2004 and we are party
to an appeal of our Confirmation Order. After reviewing the currently pending lawsuits and
proceedings (including the probable outcomes, reasonably anticipated costs and expenses,
availability and limits of our insurance coverage and surety bonds and our established reserves for
uninsured liabilities), we do not believe that any liabilities that may result from these
proceedings are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial
condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We discussed a number of risk factors that could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations in Item 1A of our 2007 Form 10-K. Except as set forth below,
there have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed.
We
could be adversely affected if we are unable to recover portions of
our high commodity costs (including costs of steel, other raw
materials and energy) from our customers.
Steel is a key raw material we use in the manufacturing of our products and we are a
significant user of steel. During 2008, steel prices have increased significantly. Many of our
customer arrangements do not include contractual provisions allowing us to obtain recovery of the
increased cost. As well, in contracts where we do have material cost escalation provisions, they do
not necessarily provide full recovery, and recovery may occur on a delayed basis. Consequently,
overall steel price pressures remain a significant concern for our business and unless we are able
to secure arrangements with our customers to recover the higher steel prices, we are likely to
experience an adverse impact on our operating results for the foreseeable future. We are actively
pursuing cost recovery actions with our customers since this is critical to our achievement of
acceptable levels of profitability. In the event that we are unable to reach mutually satisfactory
relationships with certain customers, there is a possibility that we could lose existing business
with these customers or be precluded from consideration for future business opportunities.
We may
be unable to comply with the financial covenants in our Exit Facility.
Through June 30, 2008 we are in full compliance with our debt covenants and expect to continue
to remain in compliance through year end and into 2009. The significant changes in the North
American vehicle market and the impact on our profitability have increased the risk that we may not
be able to maintain compliance if the market continues to deteriorate significantly. Satisfying
the debt covenants in the future could require the use of a portion of available cash to
reduce debt.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The Exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are filed or furnished with this report.
79
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana Holding Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2008 |
/s/ James A. Yost
|
|
|
James A. Yost |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
80
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of Filing or |
No. |
|
Description |
|
Furnishing |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed with this report |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Filed with this report |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
Furnished with this report |
81