e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended May 1, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-33764
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
36-3685240
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Remington Blvd., Suite 120 |
|
|
Bolingbrook, Illinois
|
|
60440 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (630) 410-4800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes
o No
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of
May 27, 2010 was 58,623,805 shares.
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,670 |
|
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
13,477 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
Merchandise inventories, net |
|
|
228,082 |
|
|
|
206,948 |
|
|
|
230,286 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
29,134 |
|
|
|
30,272 |
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,890 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,060 |
|
|
|
8,060 |
|
|
|
8,195 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
281,997 |
|
|
|
262,774 |
|
|
|
284,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
285,766 |
|
|
|
290,861 |
|
|
|
286,140 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
567,763 |
|
|
$ |
553,635 |
|
|
$ |
570,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,534 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
60,693 |
|
|
|
56,387 |
|
|
|
53,500 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
54,789 |
|
|
|
59,189 |
|
|
|
43,757 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
122,222 |
|
|
|
126,357 |
|
|
|
109,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,047 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
114,051 |
|
|
|
113,718 |
|
|
|
104,168 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
17,616 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
257,225 |
|
|
|
261,027 |
|
|
|
319,622 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 3)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Balance Sheets (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 400,000 shares
authorized; 59,095, 58,674 and 58,254 shares
issued; 58,590, 58,169 and 57,749 shares
outstanding; at May 1, 2010 (unaudited),
January 31, 2009 and May 2, 2009
(unaudited), respectively |
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
Treasury stock-common, at cost |
|
|
(4,179 |
) |
|
|
(4,179 |
) |
|
|
(4,179 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
304,965 |
|
|
|
300,701 |
|
|
|
294,377 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
9,161 |
|
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
|
|
(38,936 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
310,538 |
|
|
|
292,608 |
|
|
|
251,321 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
567,763 |
|
|
$ |
553,635 |
|
|
$ |
570,943 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
4
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
320,196 |
|
|
$ |
268,825 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
215,661 |
|
|
|
189,283 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
104,535 |
|
|
|
79,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
80,729 |
|
|
|
69,393 |
|
Pre-opening expenses |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,332 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
23,214 |
|
|
|
8,283 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
58,306 |
|
|
|
57,743 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
60,276 |
|
|
|
58,750 |
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,918 |
|
|
|
15,365 |
|
Non-cash stock compensation charges |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
5,426 |
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
|
(21,134 |
) |
|
|
(16,684 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
2,738 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(7,722 |
) |
|
|
(4,255 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
17,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(7,698 |
) |
|
|
(12,320 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(7,698 |
) |
|
|
(12,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,284 |
|
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(289,750 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock plans |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
(5,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,670 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
723 |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
12,870 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in property and equipment included in accrued
liabilities |
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap hedge, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
6
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Statement of Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
Earnings |
|
Total |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
(Accumulated |
|
Stockholders |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Deficit) |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 30, 2010 |
|
|
58,674 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,179 |
) |
|
$ |
300,701 |
|
|
$ |
(4,500 |
) |
|
$ |
292,608 |
|
Common stock options exercised |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
Net income for the three months ended May 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,661 |
|
|
|
13,661 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
Stock compensation charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
|
Balance May 1, 2010 |
|
|
59,095 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,179 |
) |
|
$ |
304,965 |
|
|
$ |
9,161 |
|
|
$ |
310,538 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Business and basis of presentation
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (Company or Ulta) was incorporated in the state of Delaware
on January 9, 1990, to operate specialty retail stores selling cosmetics, fragrance, haircare and
skincare products, and related accessories and services. The stores also feature full-service
salons. As of May 1, 2010, the Company operated 347 stores in 38 states, as shown in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
Number of stores |
Alabama |
|
|
7 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
23 |
|
Arkansas |
|
|
1 |
|
California |
|
|
30 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
11 |
|
Connecticut |
|
|
1 |
|
Delaware |
|
|
1 |
|
Florida |
|
|
25 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
16 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
33 |
|
Indiana |
|
|
6 |
|
Iowa |
|
|
3 |
|
Kansas |
|
|
1 |
|
Kentucky |
|
|
2 |
|
Louisiana |
|
|
2 |
|
Maryland |
|
|
6 |
|
Massachusetts |
|
|
4 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
9 |
|
Minnesota |
|
|
7 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
3 |
|
Missouri |
|
|
3 |
|
Nebraska |
|
|
2 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
6 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
11 |
|
New York |
|
|
12 |
|
North Carolina |
|
|
13 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
7 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
7 |
|
Oregon |
|
|
3 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
16 |
|
Rhode Island |
|
|
1 |
|
South Carolina |
|
|
6 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
3 |
|
Texas |
|
|
46 |
|
Utah |
|
|
2 |
|
Virginia |
|
|
10 |
|
Washington |
|
|
5 |
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
347 |
|
The accompanying unaudited financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions Article 10,
Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements reflect all
adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to fairly state the financial
position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented.
The Companys business is subject to seasonal fluctuation. Significant portions of the Companys
net sales and net income are realized during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year due to the
holiday selling season. The results for the three months ended May 1, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2011, or for any
other future interim period or for any future year.
These interim financial statements and the related notes should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 30, 2010. All amounts are stated in thousands, with the exception of per share
amounts and number of stores.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
Information regarding the Companys significant accounting policies is contained in Note 2,
Summary of significant accounting policies, to the financial statements in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2010. Presented
8
below in this and the following
notes is supplemental information that should be read in conjunction with Notes to Financial
Statements in the Annual Report.
Fiscal quarter
The Companys quarterly periods are the 13 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to April 30, July
31, October 31, and January 31. The Companys first quarters in fiscal 2010 and 2009 ended on May
1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively.
Reclassifications
The Company made a reclassification of $199 to the first quarter 2009 statement of income to
decrease cost of sales and increase selling, general and administrative expenses to conform to the
first quarter 2010 presentation.
Share-based compensation
The Company measures share-based compensation cost on the grant date, based on the fair value of
the award, and recognizes the expense over the requisite service period for awards expected to
vest. The Company estimated the grant date fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes
valuation model using the following assumptions for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
Volatility rate |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Average expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
The Company granted 109 and 76 stock options during the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2,
2009, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of these options was $12.68 and
$3.57, respectively.
The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $1,735 and $1,295 for the three months ended May
1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively. At May 1, 2010, there was approximately $12,172 of
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options.
On April 26, 2010, the Company announced that Mr. Carl (Chuck) Rubin would be appointed President
and Chief Operating Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors effective May 10, 2010. In
connection with Mr. Rubins employment agreement dated April 12, 2010, he received a restricted
share grant of 119 shares valued at $2,775 which will vest in full on December 29, 2011. Mr. Rubin
also received a grant of 319 stock options valued at $3,694 which will vest and become exercisable
in four equal installments commencing on February 1, 2011 and each subsequent anniversary, such
that all such options will be fully vested on February 1, 2014. Both of these share-based grants
occurred on May 10, 2010 and will be recognized in subsequent periods according to their vesting
schedules.
Mr. Rubin will also receive a one-time cash payment of $2,800 in August 2010 as part of his employment agreement.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and gains and losses from derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges, net of income tax. Total comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap hedge, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
5,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
9
3. Commitments and contingencies
Leases The Company leases stores, distribution and office facilities, and certain equipment.
Original non-cancelable lease terms range from three to ten years, and store leases generally
contain renewal options for additional years. A number of the Companys store leases provide for
contingent rentals based upon sales. Contingent rent amounts were insignificant in the three months
ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009. Total rent expense under operating leases was $19,459 and
$17,936 for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, respectively.
General litigation As previously disclosed, in July 2009, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against
the Company and certain unnamed defendants in State Court in California. The suit alleges that
Ulta misclassified its store General Managers and Salon Managers as exempt from the Fair Labor
Standards Act and California Labor Code. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a
result of this alleged misclassification. On August 27, 2009, the Company filed its answer to the
lawsuit, and on August 31, 2009 the Company moved the action to the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. On November 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint adding another named plaintiff. On May 26, 2010, the Company and plaintiffs engaged in a voluntary mediation. Although the company
continues to deny plaintiffs allegations, in the interest of putting the Salon Manager claims
behind it, the company agreed in principle to settle all claims of the putative Salon Manager
class. The settlement, which is not an admission of liability, is subject to final documentation
and Court approval. Counsel for the plaintiffs has agreed to dismiss without prejudice the claims
of the General Managers. The Company does not believe that the amount of settlement is material.
In May, 2010, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain
unnamed defendants in State Court in California. The plaintiff and members of the proposed class
are alleged to be (or have been) nonexempt hourly employees. The suit alleges that Ulta violated
various provisions of the California labor laws and failed to provide plaintiff and members of the
proposed class with full meal periods, paid rest breaks, certain wages, overtime compensation and
premium pay. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a result of these alleged
practices. Although the Company believes that it has meritorious
defenses to the claims made in the putative class action and the Company intends to contest the
lawsuit vigorously, an adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on
its financial position and results of operations in the period in which the lawsuit is resolved.
The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the
lawsuit.
The Company is also involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its
business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these
proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not be material.
4. Notes payable
The Companys credit facility is with Bank of America National Association as the administrative
agent, Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation as collateral agent, and JP Morgan Chase Bank as
documentation agent. This facility provides maximum credit of $200,000 through May 31, 2011. The
facility provides maximum borrowings equal to the lesser of $200,000 or a percentage of eligible
owned inventory. The advance rates on owned inventory are 80% (85% from September 1 to January
31). The credit facility agreement contains a restrictive financial covenant requiring the Company
to maintain tangible net worth of not less than $80,000. On May 1, 2010, the Companys tangible net
worth was approximately $311,000. Substantially all of the Companys assets are pledged as
collateral for outstanding borrowings under the facility. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at
the prime rate or the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% up to $100,000 and 1.25% thereafter.
The Company had no outstanding borrowings under the facility as of May 1, 2010 and January 30,
2010. The Company had approximately $190,855 and $196,933 of availability as of May 1, 2010 and
January 30, 2010, respectively.
5. Financial instruments
The Company had an interest rates swap agreement which expired in January 2010 and held no
derivative instruments as of May 1, 2010 and January 30, 2010. The Companys derivative financial
instrument was designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge. Accordingly, the effective portion of
the gain or loss on the derivative instrument was reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss and reclassified into interest expense in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss, the ineffective portion,
on the derivative instrument, if other than inconsequential, was recognized in interest expense
during the period of change. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material in the three months ended May
1, 2010 and May 2, 2009.
10
The following table presents the impact of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships and their
location within the unaudited statements of income and accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in AOCL on |
|
Amount of Gain Reclassfied |
|
Amount of Gain Recognized |
|
|
Derivative (Effective |
|
from AOCL into Income |
|
in Income on Derivative |
|
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
Interest rate swap,
net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
6. Fair Value Measurements
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable
approximates their estimated fair values due to the short maturities of these instruments. The
estimated fair value of any variable rate debt outstanding approximates its carrying value since
the rate of interest on the variable rate debt is revised frequently based upon the current prime
rate or the Eurodollar rate.
On February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the ASC rules for fair value measurements and disclosures.
The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial statements. The new rules established a
three-tier hierarchy for fair value measurements, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active
markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either
directly or indirectly through corroboration with observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which would
require the Company to develop its own assumptions. |
As of May 1, 2010, the Company held certain liabilities that are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. The fair value of the Companys liabilities associated with its
non-qualified deferred compensation plan are based primarily on third-party reported net asset
values, which are primarily based on quoted market prices of the underlying assets of the funds and
have been categorized as Level 2. The following table presents the Companys financial liabilities
as of May 1, 2010 measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Deferred compensation liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
11
7. Net income per common share
The following is a reconciliation of net income and the number of shares of common stock used in
the computation of net income per basic and diluted share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per share
weighted-average common shares |
|
|
58,306 |
|
|
|
57,743 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share |
|
|
60,276 |
|
|
|
58,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
The denominators for diluted net income per common share for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and
May 2, 2009 exclude 803 and 3,481 employee stock options, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive
effects.
12
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
quarterly report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things,
future events and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the
use of forward-looking words such as outlook, believes, expects, plans, estimates, or
other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are based upon
our historical performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this
forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person
that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which include, without
limitation: the impact of weakness in the economy; changes in the overall level of consumer
spending; changes in the wholesale cost of our products; the possibility that we may be unable to
compete effectively in our highly competitive markets; the possibility that our continued opening
of new stores could strain our resources and have a material adverse effect on our business and
financial performance; the possibility that new store openings may be impacted by developer or
co-tenant issues; the possibility that the capacity of our distribution and order fulfillment
infrastructure may not be adequate to support our recent growth and expected future growth plans;
the possibility of material disruptions to our information systems; weather conditions that could
negatively impact sales; and other risk factors detailed in our public filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including risk factors contained in Item 1A, Risk Factors of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended january 30, 2010. We assume no obligation
to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or
developments. References in the following discussion to we, us, our, the Company, Ulta
and similar references mean Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. unless otherwise expressly
stated or the context otherwise requires.
Overview
We were founded in 1990 as a discount beauty retailer at a time when prestige, mass and salon
products were sold through separate distribution channels. In 1999 we embarked on a multi-year
strategy to understand and embrace what women want in a beauty retailer and transform Ulta into the
shopping experience that it is today. We pioneered what we believe to be our unique combination of
beauty superstore and specialty store attributes. We believe our strategy provides us with the
competitive advantages that have contributed to our strong financial performance.
We are currently the largest beauty retailer that provides one-stop shopping for prestige, mass and
salon products and salon services in the United States. We combine the unique elements of a beauty
superstore with the distinctive environment and experience of a specialty retailer. Key aspects of
our beauty superstore strategy include our ability to offer our customers a broad selection of over
21,000 beauty products across the categories of cosmetics, fragrance, haircare, skincare, bath and
body products and salon styling tools, as well as salon haircare products. We focus on delivering a
compelling value proposition to our customers across all of our product categories. Our stores are
conveniently located in high-traffic, primarily off-mall locations such as power centers and
lifestyle centers with other destination retailers. As of May 1, 2010, we operated 347 stores
across 38 states. In addition to these fundamental elements of a beauty superstore, we strive to
offer an uplifting shopping experience through what we refer to as The Five Es: Escape,
Education, Entertainment, Esthetics and Empowerment.
The continued growth of our business and any future increases in net sales, net income and cash
flows are dependent on our ability to execute our growth strategy, including growing our store
base, expanding our prestige brand offerings, driving incremental salon traffic, expanding our
online business and continuing to enhance our brand awareness. We believe that the steadily
expanding U.S. beauty products and services industry, the shift in distribution of prestige beauty
products from department stores to specialty retail stores, coupled with Ultas competitive
strengths, positions us to capture additional market share in the industry through successful
execution of our growth strategy.
Comparable store sales is a key metric that is monitored closely within the retail industry. We do
not expect our comparable store sales increases over the next five years to reflect the sustained
high single digit to low double digit increases we experienced in 2005 through early 2007. We
believe the sequential decline in our quarterly comparable store sales during 2008 and the
comparable store sales declines in first and second quarter 2009 were due primarily to the
difficult economic environment. Our comparables store sales trend improved during the second half
of fiscal 2009 and into the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We believe the continuing economic
uncertainty and related impact on consumer sentiment may affect the level of comparable store sales
we can achieve.
Over the long-term, our growth strategy is to increase total net sales through increases in our
comparable store sales and by opening new stores. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales is
expected to increase as a result of our ability to leverage our supply chain
13
infrastructure and fixed store costs with comparable store sales increases. We plan to continue to
improve our operating results by leveraging our fixed costs and decreasing our selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of our net sales.
Global economic conditions
The global economic crisis and the continued volatility and disruption to the capital and credit
markets have had a significant, adverse impact on global economic conditions, resulting in
additional significant recessionary pressures and declines in consumer confidence and economic
growth. As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit has been and
may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. Concern
about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically has
led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide credit
to businesses and consumers. These factors have led to a decrease in spending by businesses and
consumers alike, and a corresponding decrease in global infrastructure spending. Continued
turbulence in the United States and international markets and economies and prolonged declines in
business and consumer spending may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the
liquidity and financial condition of our customers, including our ability to refinance maturing
liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
Current business trends
We recorded a 10.8% increase in our comparable store sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2010
which extended the sequential comparable store sales improvement which began in the second half of
fiscal 2009. We believe the improvement in our comparable store sales trends is due to a
combination of factors including our ability to better plan our marketing and merchandise programs
for the current economic environment and the relatively lower comparable in the prior year first
quarter period. We also believe that overall consumer sentiment and shopping patterns began to
improve in the second half of 2009 which may have contributed to our improving trends. In light of
the current economic uncertainty in both the U.S. and world financial markets, consumer sentiment
could turn negative which could result in a deceleration of the favorable comparable store sales
trends we have experienced in recent quarters.
Change in Management
On April 26, 2010, we announced that Mr. Carl (Chuck) Rubin would be appointed President and
Chief Operating Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors effective May 10, 2010.
Following a transition period of up to four months, Mr. Rubin will become Chief Executive Officer.
Lyn Kirby will continue as Chief Executive Officer through the transition period and thereafter
is expected to provide guidance and counsel as a member of the Companys Board of Directors through March 17,
2011.
Basis of presentation
Net sales include store and e-commerce merchandise sales as well as salon service revenue. Salon
service revenue represented less than 10% of our combined product
sales and services revenues for the three months ended May 1,
2010 and May 2, 2009 and
therefore, these revenues are combined with product sales. We recognize merchandise revenue at the
point of sale (POS) in our retail stores and the time of shipment in the case of Internet sales.
Merchandise sales are recorded net of estimated returns. Salon service revenue is recognized at the
time the service is provided. Gift card sales revenue is deferred until the customer redeems the
gift card. Company coupons and other incentives are recorded as a reduction of net sales.
Comparable store sales reflect sales for stores beginning on the first day of the 14th month of
operation. Therefore, a store is included in our comparable store base on the first day of the
period after one year of operations plus the initial one month grand opening period. Non-comparable
store sales include sales from new stores that have not yet completed their 13th month of operation
and stores that were closed for part or all of the period in either year as a result of remodel
activity. Remodeled stores are included in comparable store sales unless the store was closed for a
portion of the current or prior period. E-commerce merchandise sales are excluded from comparable
store sales. There may be variations in the way in which some of our competitors and other
retailers calculate comparable or same store sales. As a result, data herein regarding our
comparable store sales may not be comparable to similar data made available by our competitors or
other retailers.
Comparable store sales is a critical measure that allows us to evaluate the performance of our
store base as well as several other aspects of our overall strategy. Several factors could
positively or negatively impact our comparable store sales results:
|
|
|
the general national, regional and local economic conditions and corresponding impact on
customer spending levels; |
14
|
|
|
the introduction of new products or brands; |
|
|
|
|
the location of new stores in existing store markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to respond on a timely basis to changes in consumer preferences; |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our various marketing activities; and |
|
|
|
|
the number of new stores opened and the impact on the average age of all of our
comparable stores. |
Cost of sales includes:
|
|
|
the cost of merchandise sold, including all vendor allowances, which are treated as a
reduction of merchandise costs; |
|
|
|
|
warehousing and distribution costs including labor and related benefits, freight, rent,
depreciation and amortization, real estate taxes, utilities, and insurance; |
|
|
|
|
store occupancy costs including rent, depreciation and amortization, real estate taxes,
utilities, repairs and maintenance, insurance, licenses, and cleaning expenses; |
|
|
|
|
salon payroll and benefits; |
|
|
|
|
customer loyalty program expense; and |
|
|
|
|
shrink and inventory valuation reserves. |
Our cost of sales may be negatively impacted as we open an increasing number of stores. Changes in
our merchandise mix may also have an impact on cost of sales. This presentation of items included
in cost of sales may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers
compute their cost of sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include:
|
|
|
payroll, bonus and benefit costs for retail and corporate employees; |
|
|
|
|
advertising and marketing costs; |
|
|
|
|
occupancy costs related to our corporate office facilities; |
|
|
|
|
stock-based compensation expense; |
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization for all assets except those related to our retail and
warehouse operations, which is included in cost of sales; and |
|
|
|
|
legal, finance, information systems and other corporate overhead costs. |
This presentation of items in selling, general and administrative expenses may not be comparable to
the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their selling, general and
administrative expenses.
Pre-opening expense includes non-capital expenditures during the period prior to store opening for
new and remodeled stores including rent during the construction period for new stores, store set-up
labor, management and employee training, and grand opening advertising.
Interest expense includes interest costs associated with our credit facility, which is structured
as an asset based lending instrument. Our interest expense will fluctuate based on the seasonal
borrowing requirements associated with acquiring inventory in advance of
15
key holiday selling periods and fluctuation in the variable interest rates we are charged on
outstanding balances. Our credit facility is used to fund seasonal inventory needs and new and
remodel store capital requirements in excess of our cash flow from operations. Our credit facility
interest is based on a variable interest rate structure which can result in increased cost in
periods of rising interest rates.
Income tax expense reflects the federal statutory tax rate and the weighted average state statutory
tax rate for the states in which we operate stores.
Results of operations
Our quarterly periods are the 13 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to April 30, July 31, October
31, and January 31. The Companys first quarters in fiscal 2010 and 2009 ended on May 1, 2010 and
May 2, 2009, respectively. Our quarterly results of operations have varied in the past and are
likely to do so again in the future. As such, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our
results of operations should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.
The following tables present the components of our results of operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 2, |
|
May 3, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(Percentage of net sales) |
Net sales |
|
$ |
320,196 |
|
|
$ |
268,825 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
215,661 |
|
|
|
189,283 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
% |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
104,535 |
|
|
|
79,542 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
80,729 |
|
|
|
69,393 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Pre-opening expenses |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,332 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
23,214 |
|
|
|
8,283 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number stores end of period |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales
increase (decrease) |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of three months ended May 1, 2010 to three months ended May 2, 2009
Net sales
Net sales increased $51.4 million, or 19.1%, to $320.2 million for the three months ended May 1,
2010, compared to $268.8 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009. The increase is primarily
due to an additional 27 new stores operating since May 2, 2009 which contributed $23.0 million to
net sales while comparable stores contributed $28.4 million to net sales when compared to last
year.
Our comparable store sales increased 10.8%, which included an 8.8% increase in traffic and a 2.0%
increase in average ticket. We attribute the increase in comparable store sales to our successful
marketing and merchandising strategies and lower relative comparable in the prior year quarter.
16
Gross profit
Gross profit increased $25.0 million, or 31.4%, to $104.5 million for the three months ended May 1,
2010, compared to $79.5 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009. Gross profit as a
percentage of net sales increased 300 basis points to 32.6% for the three months ended May 1, 2010,
compared to 29.6% for the three months ended May 2, 2009. The increases in gross profit margin were
primarily driven by:
|
|
|
160 basis points of leverage in fixed store costs due to a combination of less drag on
the relatively smaller new store program in fiscal 2009 and increased comparable store
sales levels; |
|
|
|
|
70 basis points improvement in merchandise margins driven by our marketing and
merchandising strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
20 basis points of leverage in supply chain due to efficiencies and increased comparable
store sales levels. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $11.3 million, or 16.3%, to $80.7
million for the three months ended May 1, 2010, compared to $69.4 million for the three months
ended May 2, 2009. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased 60 basis points to 25.2%
for the three months ended May 1, 2010, compared to 25.8% for the three months ended May 2, 2009.
The improvement in SG&A expenses is primarily due to:
|
|
|
40 basis points of leverage in marketing expense attributed to the carry-forward benefit
of our fiscal 2009 cost efficiencies and stronger comparable store sales levels; and |
|
|
|
|
20 basis points of leverage in store payroll and variable store expenses on increased
comparable store sales levels. |
Pre-opening expenses
Pre-opening expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 60.3%, to $0.5 million for the three months ended
May 1, 2010, compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009. During the three
months ended May 1, 2010, we opened 2 new stores and relocated 1 store, compared to 9 new store
openings during the three months ended May 2, 2009.
Interest expense
Interest expense was $0.1 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010, compared to $0.7 million
for the three months ended May 2, 2009. We did not access our credit facility during the first
quarter fiscal 2010. Interest expense for the period represents various fees related to the credit
facility.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense of $9.6 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 represents an effective
tax rate of 41.2%, compared to $3.4 million of tax expense representing an effective tax rate of
40.6% for the three months ended May 2, 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily
due to an increase in non-deductible compensation expense in fiscal 2010.
Net income
Net income increased $8.8 million, or 177.7%, to $13.7 million for the three months ended May 1,
2010, compared to $4.9 million for the three months ended May 2, 2009. The increase is primarily
related to the $25.0 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by an $11.3 million
increase in SG&A expenses.
Liquidity and capital resources
Our primary cash needs are for capital expenditures for new, relocated and remodeled stores,
increased merchandise inventories related to store expansion, and for continued improvement in our
information technology systems.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, including changes in working
capital, and borrowings under our credit facility. The most significant component of our working
capital is merchandise inventories reduced by related accounts payable and accrued expenses. Our
working capital position benefits from the fact that we generally collect cash from sales to
customers the same day, or within several days of the related sale, while we typically have up to
30 days to pay our vendors.
17
Our working capital needs are greatest from August through November each year as a result of our
inventory build-up during this period for the approaching holiday season. This is also the time of
year when we are at maximum investment levels in our new store class and may not have collected all
of the landlord allowances due to us as part of our lease agreements. Based on past performance and
current expectations, we believe that cash generated from operations and borrowings under the
credit facility will satisfy the Companys working capital needs, capital expenditure needs,
commitments, and other liquidity requirements through at least the next 12 months.
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the three months ended May 1, 2010 and
May 2, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 1, |
|
May 2, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
9,817 |
|
|
$ |
17,957 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(7,698 |
) |
|
|
(12,320 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
(5,435 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,653 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
Operating activities consist of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock-based compensation, excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation, realized gains or losses on disposal of property and equipment, and the
effect of working capital changes.
Merchandise inventories were $228.1 million at May 1, 2010, compared to $230.3 million at May 2,
2009, representing an decrease of $2.2 million. The decrease is due to an 8.7% decrease in average
inventory per store driven by our management initiatives offset by the addition of 27 net new
stores opened since May 2, 2009. The reduction in inventories did not affect our store in-stock
levels or the customer experience.
Deferred rent liabilities were $114.1 million at May 1, 2010, an increase of $9.9 million compared
to May 2, 2009. Deferred rent includes deferred construction allowances, future rental increases
and rent holidays which are all recognized on a straight-line basis over their respective lease
term. The increase is due to activity since May 2, 2009 which includes 27 net new stores.
Investing activities
We have historically used cash primarily for new and remodeled stores as well as investments in
information technology systems. Investment activities related to capital expenditures were $7.7
million during the three months ended May 1, 2010, compared to $12.3 million during the three
months ended May 2, 2009. The decrease in capital expenditures year over year is primarily due to
the reduced number of new stores during the three months ended May 1, 2010. The reduction in new
stores is primarily due to a shift in the pacing of our new store opening schedule in fiscal 2010
as compared to fiscal 2009. Capital expenditures for the three months ended May 1, 2010 included 2
new stores and 1 relocated store while capital expenditures for the three months ended May 2, 2009
included 9 new stores.
Financing activities
Financing activities consist principally of capital stock transactions. The decrease in net cash
provided by financing activities of $7.9 million for the three months ended May 1, 2010 compared to
the three months ended May 2, 2009 is primarily the result of increased payments on long-term
borrowings during first quarter fiscal 2009 and proceeds from the issuance of common stock under
stock plans during first quarter fiscal 2010.
We had no borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of May 1, 2010 and January 30, 2010.
The zero outstanding borrowings position is due to a combination of factors including stronger than
expected sales growth, overall performance of management initiatives including expense control as
well as inventory and other working capital reductions. While we expect the level of borrowings
under the facility will be lower than historical amounts, we expect that we will require borrowings
under the facility from time to time in future periods to support our new store program and
seasonal inventory needs.
18
Credit facility
Our credit facility is with Bank of America National Association as the administrative agent,
Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation as collateral agent, and JP Morgan Chase Bank as documentation
agent. This facility provides maximum credit of $200 million through May 31, 2011. The facility
provides maximum borrowings equal to the lesser of $200 million or a percentage of eligible owned
inventory. The advance rates on owned inventory are 80% (85% from September 1 to January 31). The
credit facility agreement contains a restrictive financial covenant requiring us to maintain
tangible net worth of not less than $80 million. On May 1, 2010, our tangible net worth was
approximately $311 million. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral for
outstanding borrowings under the facility. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at the prime rate
or the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% up to $100 million and 1.25% thereafter.
We had no outstanding borrowings under the facility as of May 1, 2010 and January 30, 2010. We had
approximately $190.9 million and $196.9 million of availability as of May 1, 2010 and January 30,
2010, respectively.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist of operating lease obligations. We do not have any
non-cancelable purchase commitments as of May 1, 2010.
Contractual obligations
Our contractual obligations consist of operating lease obligations and our revolving line of
credit. No material changes outside the ordinary course of business have occurred in our
contractual obligations during the three months ended May 1, 2010.
Critical accounting policies and estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements required the use of
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. Management bases estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to
be reasonable under the circumstances and evaluates these estimates on an on-going basis. Actual
results may differ from these estimates. There have been no significant changes to the critical
accounting policies and estimates included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 30, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse
changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of
fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Interest rate sensitivity
We did not access our credit facility during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The interest
expense recognized in our statement of income for the first quarter fiscal 2010 represents fees
associated with the credit facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures over Financial Reporting
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to the members
of our senior management and board of directors.
Based on managements evaluation as of May 1, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
19
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months
ended May 1, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
General
litigation As previously disclosed, in July 2009, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against us
and certain unnamed defendants in State Court in California. The suit alleges that Ulta
misclassified its store General Managers and Salon Managers as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards
Act and California Labor Code. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a result of this
alleged misclassification. On August 27, 2009, we filed our answer to the lawsuit, and on August
31, 2009 we moved the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California. On November 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding another named
plaintiff. On May 26, 2010, the Company and plaintiffs engaged in a voluntary mediation. Although we continue
to deny plaintiffs allegations, in the interest of putting the Salon Manager claims behind us, we
agreed in principle to settle all claims of the putative Salon Manager class. The settlement,
which is not an admission of liability, is subject to final documentation and Court approval.
Counsel for the plaintiffs has agreed to dismiss without prejudice the claims of the General
Managers. We do not believe that the amount of settlement is material.
In May,
2010, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain
unnamed defendants in State Court in California. The plaintiff and members of the proposed class
are alleged to be (or have been) nonexempt hourly employees. The suit alleges that Ulta violated
various provisions of the California labor laws and failed to provide plaintiff and members of the
proposed class with full meal periods, paid rest breaks, certain wages, overtime compensation and
premium pay. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a result of these alleged
practices. Although we believe that we have meritorious
defenses to the claims made in the putative class action and we intend to contest the
lawsuit vigorously, an adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on
our financial position and results of operations in the period in which the lawsuit is resolved.
We are not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the
lawsuit.
We are also involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of our
business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these
proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not be material.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report and the risk factor set forth below,
you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2010, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition, financial results or future performance. There have been no material
changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 30, 2010.
We are currently undergoing a leadership transition. The execution of our business plan and
development strategy could be harmed if we are not able to successfully manage this transition.
Our senior management team has historically been led by Lyn Kirby, our Chief Executive Officer, as
well as Gregg Bodnar, our Chief Financial Officer. As part of a leadership transition plan, we
announced on April 26, 2010 that Carl Chuck Rubin would join the Company as President and Chief
Operating Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors effective May 10, 2010. Following a
transition period of up to approximately four months, Mr. Rubin will take over as Chief Executive
Officer from Lyn Kirby and work with our management team and our Board of Directors. This
transition could create uncertainty if Chucks integration into our company is not successful or if
the transition creates uncertainty among our employees, customers, or vendors. New leadership
could also result in changes to the strategic direction of our business, which could negatively
affect our business, operating results and financial position.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. [Reserved]
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
20
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Filed |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
File |
|
Filing |
Number |
|
Description of document |
|
Herewith |
|
Form |
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Date |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
333-144405
|
|
8/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
333-144405
|
|
8/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
333-144405
|
|
10/11/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Third Amended and Restated
Registration Rights Agreement
between Ulta Salon, Cosmetics &
Fragrance, Inc. and the
stockholders party thereto
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
333-144405
|
|
8/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Stockholder Rights Agreement
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
333-144405
|
|
8/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Succession agreement, dated as
of April 23, 2010, by and
between Ulta Salon, Cosmetics &
Fragrance, Inc. and Lyn Kirby.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
001-33764
|
|
4/27/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as
of April 12, 2010, by and
between Ulta Salon, Cosmetics &
Fragrance, Inc. and Carl Rubin.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
001-33764
|
|
4/27/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Carl Rubin
Employment Agreement, dated
April 28, 2010. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Restricted Stock Award
Agreement, dated May 10, 2010,
by and between Ulta Salon,
Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. and
Carl Rubin.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
001-33764
|
|
4/27/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Option Agreement, dated May 10,
2010, by and between Ulta Salon,
Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. and
Carl Rubin.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
001-33764
|
|
4/27/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to
section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to
section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on June 3, 2010 on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Lynelle P. Kirby
|
|
|
|
Lynelle P. Kirby |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Gregg R. Bodnar
|
|
|
|
Gregg R. Bodnar |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
22