10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8641
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Idaho
|
|
82-0109423 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
PO Box I,
505 Front Ave.
Coeur dAlene, Idaho
|
|
83816 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(208) 667-3511
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Applicable only to corporate issuers: Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of
Issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common stock, par value
$1.00, of which 551,335,009 shares were issued and outstanding as of October 28, 2008.
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION
INDEX
2
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share, per ounce amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
55,677 |
|
|
$ |
98,671 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
23,301 |
|
|
|
53,039 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
64,767 |
|
|
|
56,121 |
|
Ore on leach pad |
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
25,924 |
|
Metal and other inventory |
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
|
18,918 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
11,496 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
7,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,915 |
|
|
|
264,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
444,494 |
|
|
|
322,733 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(84,973 |
) |
|
|
(69,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,521 |
|
|
|
252,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINING PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational mining properties |
|
|
217,944 |
|
|
|
143,324 |
|
Less accumulated depletion |
|
|
(129,686 |
) |
|
|
(124,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,258 |
|
|
|
18,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral interests |
|
|
1,758,226 |
|
|
|
1,731,715 |
|
Less accumulated depletion |
|
|
(15,165 |
) |
|
|
(11,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,743,061 |
|
|
|
1,720,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-producing and development properties |
|
|
363,046 |
|
|
|
311,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,194,365 |
|
|
|
2,050,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore on leach pad, non-current portion |
|
|
22,918 |
|
|
|
24,995 |
|
Restricted assets |
|
|
24,980 |
|
|
|
25,760 |
|
Receivables, non current |
|
|
28,395 |
|
|
|
18,708 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
12,648 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,233 |
|
|
|
84,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,860,034 |
|
|
$ |
2,651,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except |
|
|
|
per share, per ounce amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
facility, current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
7,149 |
|
|
$ |
30,831 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
55,501 |
|
|
|
49,642 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
15,163 |
|
|
|
9,072 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
4,765 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
8,033 |
|
|
|
9,342 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure |
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,157 |
|
|
|
111,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2028 |
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes due January 2024 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Non-current portion of other long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
19,833 |
|
|
|
23,661 |
|
Reclamation and mine closure |
|
|
29,453 |
|
|
|
30,629 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
574,234 |
|
|
|
573,681 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,857 |
|
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039,377 |
|
|
|
812,650 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Notes K, L, M, N, O and P) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share; authorized 750,000,000 shares,
issued 551,893,594 shares in 2008 and 551,512,230 shares in 2007 |
|
|
551,894 |
|
|
|
551,512 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,609,633 |
|
|
|
1,607,737 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(423,622 |
) |
|
|
(419,331 |
) |
Shares held in treasury |
|
|
(13,190 |
) |
|
|
(13,190 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,724,500 |
|
|
|
1,727,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,860,034 |
|
|
$ |
2,651,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts) |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of metal |
|
$ |
39,763 |
|
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
|
$ |
147,073 |
|
|
$ |
155,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable to sales |
|
|
30,694 |
|
|
|
38,231 |
|
|
|
80,852 |
|
|
|
85,991 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
16,669 |
|
Administrative and general |
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
4,706 |
|
|
|
20,163 |
|
|
|
16,590 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
14,291 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
Pre-development |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
48,525 |
|
|
|
50,100 |
|
|
|
151,119 |
|
|
|
128,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(8,762 |
) |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
(4,046 |
) |
|
|
26,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
12,301 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expense |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(7,470 |
) |
|
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
|
38,984 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
(2,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(9,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
29,571 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(4,160 |
) |
|
$ |
3,409 |
|
|
$ |
(5,145 |
) |
|
$ |
29,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
550,096 |
|
|
|
277,800 |
|
|
|
550,059 |
|
|
|
277,747 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
550,096 |
|
|
|
302,336 |
|
|
|
550,059 |
|
|
|
302,249 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,634 |
) |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
(4,291 |
) |
|
$ |
29,571 |
|
Add (deduct) non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
16,669 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(3,894 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(7,795 |
) |
|
|
806 |
|
Unrealized loss (income) on embedded derivative, net |
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
8,639 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
Other |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables and other assets |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
(22,536 |
) |
|
|
(23,825 |
) |
|
|
(19,911 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
10,773 |
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(5,381 |
) |
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
(9,366 |
) |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
(9,037 |
) |
|
|
28,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(87,727 |
) |
|
|
(57,325 |
) |
|
|
(256,362 |
) |
|
|
(157,029 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(58,973 |
) |
|
|
(26,455 |
) |
|
|
(304,596 |
) |
|
|
(77,034 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments |
|
|
124,894 |
|
|
|
24,130 |
|
|
|
334,604 |
|
|
|
106,392 |
|
Other |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(21,757 |
) |
|
|
(59,747 |
) |
|
|
(226,343 |
) |
|
|
(127,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of credit facility, long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(22,389 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(30,213 |
) |
|
|
(1,148 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(21,596 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
192,386 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(42,165 |
) |
|
|
(65,742 |
) |
|
|
(42,994 |
) |
|
|
(100,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
97,842 |
|
|
|
236,232 |
|
|
|
98,671 |
|
|
|
270,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
55,677 |
|
|
$ |
170,490 |
|
|
$ |
55,677 |
|
|
$ |
170,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they
do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three- and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ending December 31, 2008. The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the
audited financial statements at that date. For further information, refer to the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation (Coeur
or the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, the most significant of which are Coeur Rochester, Inc.,
Coeur Alaska, Inc., CDE Cerro Bayo Ltd., Coeur Argentina, CDE Australia Pty Ltd., Empressa Minera
Manquiri S.A., Bolnisi Gold N.L. and Palmarejo Silver and Gold Corporation. The consolidated
financial statements also include all entities in which voting control of more than 50% is held by
the Company. The Company has no investments in entities in which it has greater than 50% ownership
interest accounted for using the equity method. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in corporate joint ventures where the Company has
ownership of 50% or less and funds its proportionate share of expenses are accounted for under the
equity method. The Company has no investments in entities in which it has a greater than 20%
ownership interest accounted for using the cost method.
Revenue Recognition: Pursuant to guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.
104, Revenue Recognition for Financial Statements, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, no obligations
remain and collectability is probable. The passing of title to the customer is based on the terms
of the sales contract. Product pricing is determined at the point revenue is recognized by
reference to active and freely traded commodity markets, for example the London Bullion Market for
both gold and silver, in an identical form to the product sold.
Under our concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, final gold and silver prices
are set on a specified future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment
date based on market metal prices. Revenues and production costs applicable to sales are recorded
on a gross basis under these contracts at the time title passes to the buyer based on the forward
price for the expected settlement period. The contracts, in general, provide for a provisional
payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices. Final settlement is based on the
average applicable price for a specified future period, and generally occurs from three to six
months after shipment. Final sales are settled using smelter weights, settlement assays (average of
assays exchanged and/or umpire assay results) and are priced as specified in the smelter contract.
The Companys provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be
separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from
the sale of concentrates measured at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded
derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting. The embedded derivative is recorded as a
derivative asset, in prepaid expenses and other assets or as a derivative liability in accrued
liabilities and other on the balance sheet and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each
period until the date of final gold and silver settlement. The form of the material being sold,
after deduction for smelting and refining is in an identical form to that sold
on the London Bullion Market. The forms of the Companys products are as metal in flotation
concentrate and doré bullion, which is the final process for which the Company is responsible.
7
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
The effects of forward sales contracts are reflected in revenue at the date the related
precious metals are delivered or the contracts expire. Third party smelting and refining costs of
$2.0 and $2.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$7.7 and $5.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are
recorded as a reduction of revenue.
At September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of $58.9
million, consisting of 2.5 million ounces of silver and 19,710 ounces of gold. For each one cent
per ounce change in realized silver price, revenue would vary (plus or minus) approximately
$25,000; and for each one dollar per ounce change in realized gold price, revenue would vary (plus
or minus) approximately $19,700. At September 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding provisionally
priced sales of $62.0 million, consisting of 3.5 million ounces of silver and 24,350 ounces of
gold. For each one cent per ounce change in realized silver price, revenue would vary (plus or
minus) approximately $35,000; and for each one dollar per ounce change in realized gold price,
revenue would vary (plus or minus) approximately $24,400.
Short-term Investments: Short-term investments principally consist of highly-liquid
United States, foreign government and corporate securities, all classified as available-for-sale
and are reported at fair value with maturities that range from three months to forty years.
Unrealized gains and losses on these investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) as a separate component of shareholders equity. Any decline in market value
considered to be other than temporary is recognized in determining net income/loss. Realized gains
and losses from the sale of these investments are included in determining net income/loss.
Ore on Leach Pad: The heap leach process is a process of extracting silver and gold
by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a
portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes. In
August 2007, the Company ceased mining and crushing operations at the Rochester mine as ore
reserves were fully mined. Residual heap leach activities are expected to continue through 2014.
The Company used several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore
placed on the leach pads. As the ore body was drilled in preparation for the blasting process,
samples are taken of the drill residue which is assayed to determine estimated quantities of
contained metal. The Company estimated the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning
satellite survey techniques. The Company then processed the ore through crushing facilities where
the output was again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the
data collected from the mining operation was completed with appropriate adjustments made to
previous estimates. The crushed ore was then transported to the leach pad for application of the
leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously
sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the
leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to dorè, which
is the final product produced by the mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or market,
with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.
The Company reported ore on leach pad of $32.3 million as of September 30, 2008. Of this
amount, $9.3 million is reported as a current asset and $22.9 million is reported as a non-current
asset. The distinction between current and non-current is based upon the expected length of time
necessary for the leaching process to remove the metals from the broken ore. The historical cost
of the metal that is expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current and the
historical cost of metals contained within the broken ore that will be extracted beyond twelve
months is classified as non-current. Inventories of ore on leach pad are valued based on actual
production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the
leach pad, adjusted for effects on monthly production of costs of abnormal production levels,
less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process.
8
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that
may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates which
are inherently inaccurate since they rely upon laboratory testwork. Testwork consists of 60 day
leach columns from which the Company projects metal recoveries up to five years in the future. The
quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate
at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory
column tests and actual experience occurring over approximately twenty years of leach pad
operations at the Rochester Mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content
during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on
laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual
experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. During the third quarter of 2008, the
Company increased its estimated silver ounces contained in the heap inventory by approximately 5.4
million ounces. The increase in estimated silver ounces contained in the heap inventory is due to
changes in estimated silver recoveries anticipated over the remainder of the residual leaching
phase. There were no changes in estimated recoveries related to gold contained in the heap.
Consequently, the Company believes its current residual heap leach activities are expected to
continue through 2014. The ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease.
Metal and Other Inventory: Inventories include concentrate ore, dorè, ore in
stockpiles and operating materials and supplies. The classification of inventory is determined by
the stage at which the ore is in the production process. To extent there is work in process
inventories at the Endeavor and Broken Hill mines, such amounts will be carried as inventories.
Inventories of ore in stock piles are sampled for gold and silver content and are valued based on
the lower of actual costs incurred or estimated net realizable value based upon the period ending
prices of gold and silver. Material that does not contain a minimum quantity of gold and silver to
cover estimated processing expense to recover the contained gold and silver is not classified as
inventory and is assigned no value. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method. Concentrate and dorè inventory
includes product at the mine site and product held by refineries and are also valued at lower of
cost or market value. Concentrate inventories associated with the Endeavor and Broken Hill mines
are held by third parties. Metal inventory costs include direct labor, materials, depreciation,
depletion and amortization as well as administrative overhead costs relating to mining activities.
Property, Plant, and Equipment: Expenditures for new facilities, assets acquired
pursuant to capital leases, new assets or expenditures that extend the useful lives of existing
facilities are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method at rates sufficient to
depreciate such costs over the shorter of estimated productive lives of such facilities or the
useful life of the individual assets. Productive lives range from 7 to 31 years for buildings and
improvements, 3 to 13 years for machinery and equipment and 3 to 7 years for furniture and
fixtures. Certain mining equipment is depreciated using the units-of-production method based upon
estimated total proven and probable reserves. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Operational Mining Properties and Mine Development: Capitalization of mine development
costs that meet the definition of an asset begins once all operating permits have been secured,
mineralization is classified as proven and probable reserves and a final feasibility study has been
completed. Mine development costs include engineering and metallurgical studies, drilling and
other related costs to delineate an ore body, the removal of overburden to initially expose an ore
body at open pit surface mines and the building of access ways, shafts, lateral access, drifts,
ramps and other infrastructure at underground mines. Costs incurred during the start-up phase of a
mine are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred before mineralization is classified as proven and
probable reserves are expensed and classified as Exploration or Pre-development expense. All
capitalized costs are amortized using the units of production method over the estimated life of the
ore body based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves.
Interest expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to construct new
facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use. Gains or losses from
sales or retirements of assets are included in other income or expense.
9
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
Drilling and related costs incurred at our operating mines are expensed as incurred as
exploration expense, unless we can conclude with a high degree of confidence, prior to the
commencement of a drilling program, that the drilling costs will result in the conversion of a
mineral resource into proven and probable reserves. Our assessment is based on the following
factors: results from previous drill programs; results from geological models; results from a mine
scoping study confirming economic viability of the resource; and preliminary estimates of mine
inventory, ore grade, cash flow and mine life. In addition, the Company must have all permitting
and/or contractual requirements necessary to have the right to and/or control of the future benefit
from the targeted ore body. The costs of a drilling program that meet these criteria are
capitalized as mine development costs. All other drilling and related costs, including those beyond
the boundaries of the development and production stage properties, are expensed as incurred.
Drilling and related costs of approximately $0.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and $0.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively,
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, met the criteria for capitalization listed
above at our properties that are in the development and production stages.
The cost of removing overburden and waste materials to access the ore body at an open pit mine
prior to the production phase are referred to as pre-stripping costs. Pre-stripping costs are
capitalized during the development of an open pit mine. Stripping costs incurred during the
production phase of a mine are variable production costs that are included as a component of
inventory to be recognized in production costs applicable to sales in the same period as the
revenue from the sale of inventory.
Mineral Interests: Significant payments related to the acquisition of land and
mineral rights are capitalized as incurred. Prior to acquiring such land or mineral rights, the
Company generally makes a preliminary evaluation to determine that the property has significant
potential to develop an economic ore body. The time between initial acquisition and full
evaluation of a propertys potential is variable and is determined by many factors including:
location relative to existing infrastructure, the propertys stage of development, geological
controls and metal prices. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when
production begins using the units-of-production method based on recoverable ounces to be mined from
proven and probable reserves. If no mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are expensed in
the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value. The Company
amortizes its mineral interests in the Endeavor and Broken Hill mines using the units of production
method.
10
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
Asset Impairment: The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to evaluate the
recoverability of its assets. Management reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for
impairment when events and changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts of
its assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if total estimated future
cash flows or probability-weighted cash flows on an undiscounted basis, are less than the carrying
amount of the assets, including property plant and equipment, mineral property, development
property, and any deferred costs. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the
difference between book value and discounted estimated future cash flows or the application of an
expected present value technique to estimate fair value in the absence of a market price. Future
cash flows include estimates of recoverable ounces, gold and silver prices (considering current and
historical prices, price trends and related factors), production levels and capital, all based on
life-of-mine plans and projections. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are subject
to risks and uncertainties. If the assets are impaired, a calculation of fair value is performed and if the
fair value is lower than the carrying value of the assets, the assets are reduced to their fair
market value. Any differences between significant assumptions and market conditions and/or the
Companys operating performance could have a material effect on the Companys determination of ore
reserves, or its ability to recover the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets resulting in
impairment charges. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for
which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset
groups. Generally, in estimating future cash flows, all assets are grouped at a particular mine
for which there is identifiable cash flow.
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company, under the terms of its lease, self
insurance, and bonding agreements with certain banks, lending institutions and regulatory agencies,
is required to collateralize certain portions of the Companys obligations. The Company has
collateralized these obligations by assigning certificates of deposit that have maturity dates
ranging from three months to a year, to the respective institutions or agency. At September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company held certificates of deposit and cash under these
agreements of $25.0 million and $25.8 million, respectively, restricted for this purpose. The
ultimate timing for the release of the collateralized amounts is primarily dependent on the timing
and closure of each mine. In order to release the collateral, the Company must seek approval from
certain government agencies responsible for monitoring the mine closure status. Collateral could
also be released to the extent the Company was able to secure alternative financial assurance
satisfactory to the regulatory agencies. The Company believes there is a reasonable probability
that the collateral will remain in place beyond a twelve-month period and has therefore classified
these investments as long-term. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company held certificates of deposit
totaling $3.5 million that were pledged to support letters of credit to Standard Bank of Argentina of $0.5
million and $3.0 million to Banco De Credito E Inversiones.
Reclamation and Remediation Costs: The Company follows SFAS No. 143, Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement
costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived
assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and normal use of the asset.
SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be
recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be
made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and
this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost,
representing the increase over time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period
in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. As reclamation work is performed or
liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced.
Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on managements best estimate at
the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be incurred at the site. Such cost
estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in
estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised.
11
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
Foreign Currency: Substantially all assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are
translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenues and expenses are
translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Foreign currency transaction gains and
losses are included in the determination of net income and/or capitalized in connection with
construction activities at the Palmarejo project.
Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company accounts for derivative financial
instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, (as amended by SFAS No. 137) and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities. These Statements require recognition of all
derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and measurement of those instruments at fair value. Appropriate
accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives held is dependent on whether the derivative
instrument is designated and qualifies as an accounting hedge and on the classification of the
hedge transaction.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portions of changes in fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income
(loss), and are recognized in the Statement of Consolidated Operations when the hedged item affects
net income (loss) for the period. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow
hedges are recognized currently in earnings. Refer to Note J Derivative Financial Instruments
and Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Stock-based Compensation Plans: Effective January 1, 2006, the Company began
recording compensation expense associated with awards of equity instruments in accordance with SFAS
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards of
equity instruments according to the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and related interpretations, and therefore no related compensation expense was
recorded for awards granted with no intrinsic value. The Company adopted the modified prospective
transition method provided for under SFAS No. 123(R), and, consequently, has not retroactively
adjusted results from prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated
with awards of equity instruments recognized includes: 1) amortization related to the remaining
unvested portion of all awards granted for the fiscal years 1995 to 2005, based on the grant date
fair value, estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation; and 2) amortization related to all equity instrument awards granted
subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The compensation costs are included in administrative and
general expenses, production costs applicable to sales and the cost of self-constructed property,
plant and equipment as deemed appropriate.
The Company continues to estimate the fair value of each stock option award on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In addition, the Company estimates the fair
value of performance share grants using the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. The Company
estimates forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical data and periodically adjusts the
forfeiture rate. The adjustment of the estimated forfeiture rate will result in a cumulative
adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
Income Taxes: The Company computes income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach which results
in the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences
or benefits of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of
assets and liabilities, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax
rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
12
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable
income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance has been
provided for the portion of the Companys net deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than
not that they will not be realized.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company provided liabilities for uncertain tax positions
in accordance with the requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 48, or FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires that the Company evaluate positions taken or
expected to be taken in its income tax filings under jurisdictions where it is required to file tax
returns and provide liability for any positions that do not meet a more likely than not
likelihood of being sustained if examined by tax authorities. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company has accrued $0.6 million related to uncertain tax positions. The Company has substantially
concluded all U.S. Federal Income tax matters for years through 1999. Federal Income tax returns
for 2000 through 2007 are subject to examination. The Company recognizes potential incurred
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company and
its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and
foreign jurisdictions.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income includes net income (loss) as well as
changes in stockholders equity that result from transactions and events other than those with
stockholders. Items of comprehensive income include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,634 |
) |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
(4,291 |
) |
|
$ |
29,571 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
|
|
(609 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
Change in fair value of cash flow
hedges, net of settlements |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,160 |
) |
|
$ |
3,409 |
|
|
$ |
(5,145 |
) |
|
$ |
29,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss) Per Share: The Company follows SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, which
requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is
computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock. The calculation of EPS for three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
550,096 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
550,059 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25% Convertible Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
550,096 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
550,059 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
|
277,800 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
29,571 |
|
|
|
277,747 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.25% Convertible Notes |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
23,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
23,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,709 |
|
|
|
302,336 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
|
302,249 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive shares (23,684,211 shares attributed to the 1.25% Convertible Senior
Notes and 3,718,845 shares attributed to outstanding options and non-vested shares) have been
excluded from the earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 as their effect was anti-dilutive. The 3 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes were not included in the
computation of diluted EPS because there is no excess conversion value over the principal amount of
the notes.
Debt Issuance Costs: Costs associated with the issuance of debt are included in other
noncurrent assets and are amortized over the term of the related debt.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in their
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The areas requiring the use of
managements estimates and assumptions relate to recoverable ounces from proven and probable
reserves that are the basis of future cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation and
amortization calculations; useful lives utilized for depreciation, depletion and amortization;
estimates of future cash flows for long lived assets; estimates of recoverable gold and silver
ounces in ore on leach pad; the amount and timing of reclamation and remediation costs; valuation
allowances for deferred tax assets; and estimates of other employee benefit liabilities.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications of prior year balances have been made to
conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods presented. On
June 27, 2008 the Company reclassified approximately $71.8 million from non-producing and
development properties to operational mining properties related to the commencement of operations
at the San Bartolomé mine.
14
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments:
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1 Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (the FSP). The
FSP applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or
other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion
option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under FASB Statement No. 133.
Convertible debt instruments within the scope of the FSP are not addressed by the existing APB 14.
The FSP would require that the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments
within the scope of the FSP be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the entitys
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This will require an allocation of the convertible debt
proceeds between the liability component and the embedded conversion option (i.e., the equity
component). The difference between the principal amount of the debt and the amount of the proceeds
allocated to the liability component would be reported as a debt discount and subsequently
amortized to earnings over the instruments expected life using the effective interest method. FSP
APB 14-1 is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and will be applied
retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company estimates that approximately $140.1 million
of debt discount will be recorded and the effective interest rate on the Companys 3 1/4%
Convertible Senior Notes will increase by approximately 7.6 percentage points to 10.8%, including
the amortization of the debt discount.
NOTE
C RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument basis (fair value option) with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
The Company already records marketable securities at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and derivative instruments and
hedging activities at fair value in accordance with SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS 133). The adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact
on the financial statements as management did not elect the fair value option for any other
financial instruments or other assets and liabilities.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157)
as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB staff
issued Staff Position No. 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS 157-2). FSP
FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The provisions of FSP FAS 157-2 are effective
for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the
fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data
obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entitys own assumptions about
market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:
|
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active;
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means. |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
15
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts))
The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by SFAS 157, assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair
value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,537 |
|
|
$ |
7,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable debt securities |
|
|
21,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Investments |
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed commercial paper |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,836 |
|
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
|
$ |
23,142 |
|
|
$ |
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, net |
|
$ |
6,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
1.25% debentures |
|
|
124,200 |
|
|
|
124,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% debentures |
|
|
135,700 |
|
|
|
135,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,273 |
|
|
$ |
259,900 |
|
|
$ |
6,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Companys cash equivalents and marketable equity securities are classified within Level 1 of the
fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. The cash equivalents that
are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets are primarily comprised of commercial
paper, short-term certificates of deposit and U.S. Treasury securities.
The
Companys marketable debt, short-term certificates of deposit
and restricted investments are valued using quoted market prices in
active markets and as such are classified within Level 2 of the fair
value hierarchy. The fair value of the marketable equity securities is calculated as the quoted
market price of the marketable equity security multiplied by the quantity of shares held by the
Company.
The asset backed commercial paper falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because
there are no observable market quotes. For these instruments, management uses significant other
observable inputs adjusted for various factors such as liquidity or managements best estimate of
fair value.
The Companys derivative instruments are valued using quoted market prices and other
significant observable inputs. Such financial instruments consist of foreign currency contracts and
commodity contracts. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The Companys outstanding debentures are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy
because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.
NOTE
D INVESTMENTS AND OTHER MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company classifies its investment securities as available-for-sale securities. Pursuant
to SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, such securities
are measured at fair market value in the financial statements with unrealized gains or losses
recorded in other comprehensive income. At the time securities are sold or otherwise disposed of,
gains or losses are included in net income. The following is a summary of available-for-sale
securities:
16
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Corporate |
|
$ |
7,328 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
U.S. Government |
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current available for sale securities |
|
|
23,304 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,301 |
|
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale securities |
|
$ |
28,462 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Corporate |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
U.S. Government |
|
|
51,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
51,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current available for sale securities |
|
|
53,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
53,039 |
|
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper |
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
59,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains and losses are based on the carrying value (cost, net of discount or
premium) of short-term investments and equity securities sold or adjusted for other than temporary
decline in market value. Short-term investments mature at various dates. The Company recorded $0.6
million realized gains in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There were no realized losses
in the 2008 or 2007 periods.
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP)
The Company acquired certain asset-backed securities in connection with the Bolnisi and
Palmarejo acquisition. Palmarejo has investments in non-bank sponsored ABCP, of which $6.3 million
is invested in Apsley Trust Class E and $0.5 million in Aurora Trust Class A.
Since a portion of the assets supporting the commercial paper was invested in U.S. sub-prime
residual mortgage-backed securities, the Company determined the fair value of the investments based
on the best available market data for such investments at the date of acquisition. The Company
recorded these investments at the date of the Palmarejo acquisition, as a non-current asset, at
their estimated fair value of $5.1 million ($5.3 million Canadian dollars). No impairments beyond
the value initially recorded were deemed necessary at September 30, 2008. The fair value reported
may change materially in subsequent periods.
NOTE E METAL AND OTHER INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate and doré inventory |
|
$ |
16,201 |
|
|
$ |
11,221 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
15,399 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal and other inventories |
|
$ |
31,600 |
|
|
$ |
18,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE F STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has an Annual Incentive Plan, Long-Term Incentive Plans (the 2003 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and the 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan) and the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (2005 Non-Employee Directors Plan). Total employee compensation expense charged
to operations and capital projects under these Plans was $1.2 million and $5.0 million, and $1.6
million and $4.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Annual Incentive Plan
Under the Annual Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors may annually approve cash-based awards
to the executive officers and key management employees based on certain Company and employee
performance measures. Cash payments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
amounted to $2.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and relate to accruals for the years 2008
and 2007.
1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Under the 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended by shareholders in 1995, the Company may
grant non-qualified and incentive stock options that are exercisable at prices equal to the fair
market value of the shares on the date of grant and vest cumulatively at an annual rate of one
third during the three-year period following the date of grant. In addition to stock options, the
Companys 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for grants of stock appreciation rights (SARs),
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash based awards,
and stock based awards.
The number of shares authorized to be issued under this plan was 2.9 million shares. There were 0.6
million shares reserved for issuance under this plan at September 30, 2008 for stock options
previously awarded. No further awards will be made under this plan.
2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP) was approved by our shareholders on May 20,
2003, and replaced our prior 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under the plan, we may grant
nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted
stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards and other
stock-based awards to our executive officers and other key employees.
The number of shares authorized for grant under this plan was 6.8 million shares. There were
5.4 million shares reserved for issuance under this plan at September 30, 2008. Of the 5.4 million
shares, 3.5 million shares can be issued for future grants. There were 1.4 million options and 0.5
million performance shares outstanding under this plan at September 30, 2008.
Non-Employee Directors Plan
On June 3, 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Equity
Incentive Plan and authorized 500,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the plan. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, 55,782 and 59,476 shares were
issued in lieu of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of Directors fees. At September 30,
2008, 0.3 million shares were reserved for issuance under this plan.
Under the previous Directors plan, options were granted only in lieu of annual directors
fees. At September 30, 2008, 0.4 million shares are reserved for issuance under this plan for stock
options previously awarded. No further grants of options will be made under this plan.
18
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
As of September 30, 2008 and 2007, options to purchase 2,433,182 shares and 2,390,949 shares
of common stock, respectively, were outstanding under the Long-Term and the Directors Plans
described above. The options are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.74 to $7.09 per share.
Stock options granted under the Companys incentive plans vest over three years and are
exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years from the grant date. Exercise prices are equal to
the fair market value of the shares on the date of the grant. The value of each option award is
estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Restricted stock grants are recorded based on the fair value of the underlying shares on the
date of grant and vest in equal installments annually over three years. Holders of the restricted
stock are entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends declared on the shares.
Performance share grants are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant.
Compensation costs ultimately recognized are equal to the grant date fair value. Vesting is
contingent on meeting certain market conditions based on relative total shareholder return. The
performance shares vest at the end of the three-year service period if the market conditions are
met and the employee remains an employee of the Company. The existence of a market condition
requires recognition of compensation cost over the requisite period regardless of whether the
market condition is ever satisfied.
The compensation expense recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 for awards of equity instruments was $0.4 million and $1.0
million, respectively, and $2.3 million and $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. As of September 30, 2008, there was $2.0 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost (net of estimated forfeitures) related to unvested stock options, restricted
stock grants and performance share grants which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average vesting period of 2.2 years.
The weighted average fair value of stock options on the date of grant, and the assumptions
used to estimate the fair value of the stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation model
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Weighted average fair value of
options granted |
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
56.0%-56.2 |
% |
|
|
58.9 |
% |
Expected life |
|
6 years |
|
6 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.0% -3.35 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected volatility of the option is determined using historical volatilities based on
historical stock prices. The Company estimated the expected life of options granted using the
midpoint between the vesting date and the original contractual term. The risk free rate was
determined using the yield available on U.S. Treasury Zero-coupon issues with a remaining term
equal to the expected life of the option. The Company has not paid dividends on its common stock
since 1996.
19
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,281,595 |
|
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
Granted |
|
|
550,180 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(9,053 |
) |
|
|
3.92 |
|
Canceled/expired |
|
|
(389,540 |
) |
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,433,182 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,735,921 shares were exercisable at September 30, 2008 at a weighted
average exercise price of $3.04.
As of September 30, 2008, the total future compensation cost related to non-vested options not
yet recognized in the statement of income was $0.4 million and the weighted average period over
which these awards are expected to be recognized was 2.2 years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
603,195 |
|
|
$ |
4.20 |
|
Granted |
|
|
560,845 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(265,705 |
) |
|
|
4.22 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(160,200 |
) |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
738,135 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there was $0.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted awards to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
The following table summarizes performance shares activity during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
420,543 |
|
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
Granted |
|
|
282,326 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(155,341 |
) |
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
547,528 |
|
|
$ |
4.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to performance shares to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.
20
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE G INCOME TAXES
The Company computes income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach which results in the recognition of
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of those assets and liabilities, as well as net operating loss and
tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences
are expected to reverse. The Company has U.S. net operating loss carryforwards which expire in 2011
through 2025. Net operating losses in foreign countries generally have an indefinite carryforward
period, however, Mexico has a 10 year carryforward period and carryforwards there expire from 2016
through 2018.
The following table summarizes the components of the Companys tax provision for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Alternative
minimum tax |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(566 |
) |
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
United States Foreign withholding |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
(797 |
) |
Argentina |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
(2,496 |
) |
|
|
(4,472 |
) |
Australia |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
(5,339 |
) |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bolivia |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Australia |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
Chile |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Bolivia |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
$ |
3,836 |
|
|
$ |
(2,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 varies from the
statutory rate primarily because of differences in tax rates for the Companys foreign operations
and changes in valuation allowances for net deferred tax assets. The
tax provision for the Companys operations in Bolivia was calculated using a year to date effective tax rate due to the volatility of current metal prices
and the start-up of operations at the San Bartolomé mine in 2008.
NOTE H SEGMENT REPORTING
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or
decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
Companys chief operating decision-making group is comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, the Senior Vice President of Operations and the President of South America.
21
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
The operating segments are managed separately because each segment represents a distinct use of
Company resources which contribute to Company cash flows in its respective geographic area. The
Companys reportable operating segments include the Rochester, Cerro Bayo, Martha, San Bartolomé,
Kensington, Palmarejo, Endeavor and Broken Hill mining properties. All operating segments are
engaged in the discovery and/or mining of gold and silver and generate the majority of their
revenues from the sale of these precious metal concentrates and/or refined precious metals. The
Cerro Bayo and Martha mines sell precious metal concentrates, typically under long-term contracts,
to smelters located in Japan (Dowa Mining Ltd.), Mexico (Met-Mex Penoles) and Germany
(Nordeutsche). Refined gold and silver produced by the San Bartolomé and Rochester mines are
principally sold on a spot basis to precious metals trading banks such as Standard Bank and Mitsui.
Concentrates produced at the Endeavor and Broken Hill mines are sold to Nystar (formerly Zinifex),
an Australia smelter. The Companys exploration programs are reported as other. The other
segment also includes the corporate headquarters, elimination of intersegment transactions and
other items necessary to reconcile to the consolidated amounts. The accounting policies of the
operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies above. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss.
Financial information relating to the Companys segments is as follows:
Segment Reporting
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken |
|
San |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
Bayo |
|
Martha |
|
Endeavor |
|
Hill |
|
Bartolomé |
|
Kensington |
|
Palmarejo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Project |
|
Project |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales of metals |
|
$ |
20,732 |
|
|
$ |
6,737 |
|
|
$ |
3,747 |
|
|
$ |
2,427 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
|
11,583 |
|
|
|
8,530 |
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,694 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,404 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
Profit (loss) |
|
|
8,479 |
|
|
|
(3,019 |
) |
|
|
(2,928 |
) |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
(7,637 |
) |
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets (A) |
|
$ |
36,074 |
|
|
$ |
50,535 |
|
|
$ |
43,068 |
|
|
$ |
42,254 |
|
|
$ |
25,439 |
|
|
$ |
270,028 |
|
|
$ |
334,498 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,771 |
|
|
$ |
12,578 |
|
|
$ |
2,691,245 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
2,623 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,635 |
|
|
$ |
12,876 |
|
|
$ |
42,265 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
$ |
87,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken |
|
San |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
Martha |
|
Endeavor |
|
Hill |
|
Bartolomé |
|
Kensington |
|
Palmarejo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Project |
|
Project |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales of metals |
|
$ |
23,250 |
|
|
$ |
12,410 |
|
|
$ |
9,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,817 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
4,694 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,231 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
4,706 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
Profit (loss) |
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets (A) |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
55,702 |
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
17,131 |
|
|
$ |
28,881 |
|
|
$ |
137,833 |
|
|
$ |
290,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,159 |
|
|
$ |
639,276 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
3,016 |
|
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
21,430 |
|
|
$ |
26,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
57,325 |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken |
|
San |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
Martha |
|
|
|
|
|
Hill |
|
Bartolomé |
|
Kensington |
|
Palmarejo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Endeavor |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Project |
|
Project |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales of metals |
|
$ |
56,762 |
|
|
$ |
37,662 |
|
|
$ |
22,765 |
|
|
$ |
11,061 |
|
|
$ |
15,928 |
|
|
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
147,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
|
35,376 |
|
|
|
24,595 |
|
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
5,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,852 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
14,291 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
16,024 |
|
|
|
18,993 |
|
|
|
37,385 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,227 |
) |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
Profit (loss) |
|
|
19,464 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
11,858 |
|
|
|
(4,566 |
) |
|
|
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
(14,913 |
) |
|
|
(26,597 |
) |
|
|
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets (A) |
|
$ |
36,074 |
|
|
$ |
50,535 |
|
|
$ |
43,068 |
|
|
$ |
42,254 |
|
|
$ |
25,439 |
|
|
$ |
270,028 |
|
|
$ |
334,498 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,771 |
|
|
$ |
12,578 |
|
|
$ |
2,691,245 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
6,759 |
|
|
$ |
3,915 |
|
|
$ |
26,513 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
97,093 |
|
|
$ |
32,306 |
|
|
$ |
88,869 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
256,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken |
|
San |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
Martha |
|
Endeavor |
|
Hill |
|
Bartolomé |
|
Kensington |
|
Palmarejo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Mine |
|
Project |
|
Project |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales of metals |
|
$ |
75,547 |
|
|
$ |
32,178 |
|
|
$ |
28,052 |
|
|
$ |
5,191 |
|
|
$ |
14,420 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
|
42,825 |
|
|
|
27,230 |
|
|
|
13,175 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,991 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
16,669 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,430 |
|
|
|
16,590 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
12,301 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
Profit (loss) |
|
|
24,707 |
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
9,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,205 |
) |
|
|
29,571 |
|
Segment assets (A) |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
55,702 |
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
17,131 |
|
|
$ |
28,881 |
|
|
$ |
137,833 |
|
|
$ |
290,464 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,159 |
|
|
$ |
639,276 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
8,773 |
|
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
49,134 |
|
|
$ |
85,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
$ |
157,029 |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Segment assets consist of receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and
equipment, and mining properties |
Revenues
from silver sales were $30.9 million and $37.9 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Revenues from gold
sales were $8.8 million and $14.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues
from silver sales were $111.8 million and $108.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Revenues from gold
sales were $35.2 million and $47.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
23
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets for reportable segments |
|
$ |
2,691,245 |
|
|
$ |
639,276 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
55,677 |
|
|
|
170,490 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
23,301 |
|
|
|
38,300 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
89,811 |
|
|
|
41,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
2,860,034 |
|
|
$ |
889,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived |
September 30, 2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
20,732 |
|
|
$ |
338,884 |
|
Australia |
|
|
5,652 |
|
|
|
65,844 |
|
Chile |
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
|
28,652 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
18,779 |
|
Bolivia |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
242,343 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859,223 |
|
Other foreign countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,763 |
|
|
$ |
2,553,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived |
September 30, 2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
23,250 |
|
|
$ |
292,814 |
|
Australia |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
43,843 |
|
Chile |
|
|
12,410 |
|
|
|
25,226 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
9,986 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Bolivia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,932 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
|
$ |
487,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived |
September 30, 2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
56,762 |
|
|
$ |
338,884 |
|
Australia |
|
|
26,989 |
|
|
|
65,844 |
|
Chile |
|
|
37,662 |
|
|
|
28,652 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
22,765 |
|
|
|
18,779 |
|
Bolivia |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
242,343 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859,223 |
|
Other foreign countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
147,073 |
|
|
$ |
2,553,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived |
September 30, 2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
75,547 |
|
|
$ |
292,814 |
|
Australia |
|
|
19,611 |
|
|
|
43,843 |
|
Chile |
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
25,226 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
28,052 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Bolivia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,932 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
155,388 |
|
|
$ |
487,948 |
|
|
|
|
NOTE I RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION
Reclamation and remediation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.
Management estimates costs associated with reclamation of mining properties as well as remediation
cost for inactive properties. The Company uses assumptions about future costs, mineral prices,
mineral processing recovery rates, production levels and capital and reclamation costs. Such
assumptions are based on the Companys current mining plan and the best available information for
making such estimates. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions;
however, actual amounts could differ from those based on such estimates and assumptions.
24
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
Changes to the Companys asset retirement obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation Beginning balance |
|
$ |
33,437 |
|
|
$ |
30,647 |
|
|
$ |
33,135 |
|
|
$ |
29,909 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation Ending balance |
|
$ |
32,960 |
|
|
$ |
30,583 |
|
|
$ |
32,960 |
|
|
$ |
30,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company has accrued $1.2 and $1.5 million as of September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, for reclamation liabilities related to former mining activities. These amounts are
also included in reclamation and mine closure liabilities.
NOTE J DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company enters into derivative instruments to manage the Companys exposure to foreign
currency exchange rates and market prices associated with changes in gold and silver commodity
prices. The Company accounts for its derivative contracts in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Accordingly, unrealized
gains and losses related to the change in fair market value of derivative contracts, which qualify
and are designated as cash flow hedges, are recorded as other comprehensive income or loss and such
amounts are recognized in earnings as the associated contracts are settled.
Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts
The Company, from time to time, enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to
reduce the foreign exchange risk associated with forecasted Chilean peso operating costs for 2008
at its Cerro Bayo mine. The contracts require the Company to exchange U.S. dollars for Chilean
pesos at a weighted average exchange rate of 493 pesos to each U.S. dollar. At September 30, 2008,
the Company had foreign exchange contracts of $3.0 million in U.S. dollars. For the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company recorded a realized gain (loss) of
approximately $(0.1) million and $0.1 million, respectively, and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company recorded a realized gain of $0.2 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, in connection with
its foreign currency hedging program. As of September 30, 2008, the fair value of the foreign
exchange contracts was a liability of $0.2 million. Change in gains (losses) accumulated in other
comprehensive income (loss) for cash flow hedging contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Change in fair value |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
(212 |
) |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(212 |
) |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate Sales Contracts
The Company enters into concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters. The contracts,
in general, provide for a provisional payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices
and the provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated
from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale
of concentrates at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which is the
final settlement price based on a future price, does not qualify for hedge accounting. These
embedded derivatives are recorded as derivative assets (in prepaid expenses and other), or
derivative liabilities (in other current liabilities), on the balance sheet and are adjusted to
fair value through earnings each period until the date of final settlement.
25
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
At September 30, 2008 the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of $58.9 million,
consisting of 2.5 million ounces of silver and 19,710 ounces of gold, which had a fair value of
approximately $52.8 million, including the embedded derivative.
Commodity Derivatives
The Company has occasionally entered into forward metal sales contracts to manage the price
risk on a portion of its cash flows against fluctuating gold prices. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company had no outstanding forward sales contracts for either gold or silver.
NOTE K LONG-TERM DEBT
3 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes
On March 18, 2008, the Company completed an offering of $230 million in aggregate principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes due 2028. The notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of
31/4% per year, payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2008.
The notes mature on March 15, 2028, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased by the
Company.
Each holder of the notes may require that the Company repurchase some or all of the holders
notes on March 15, 2013, March 15, 2015, March 15, 2018 and March 15, 2023 at a repurchase price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at
the Companys election. Holders will also have the right, following certain fundamental change
transactions, to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of their notes for cash at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued
and unpaid interest. The Company may redeem the notes for cash in whole or in part at any time on
or after March 22, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued
and unpaid interest.
The notes provide for net share settlement of any conversions. Pursuant to this feature,
upon conversion of the notes, the Company (1) will pay the note holder an amount in cash equal to
the lesser of the conversion obligation or the principal amount of the notes, and (2) will settle
any excess of the conversion obligation above the notes principal amount in the Companys common
stock, cash or a combination thereof, at the Companys election.
The notes will be convertible under certain circumstances, at the holders option, at an
initial conversion rate of 176.0254 shares of the Companys common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $5.68 per
share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The fair value of the 31/4% Convertible Senior Notes as determined by market transactions on
September 30, 2008 was $135.7 million.
26
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
1 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes
The $180.0 million principal amount of 1 1/4% Convertible Senior Notes due January 2024
outstanding at September 30, 2008 are convertible into shares of common stock at the option of the
holder on January 15, 2011, 2014 and 2019, unless previously redeemed, at a conversion price of
$7.60 per share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The Company is required to make semi-annual interest payments. The notes are redeemable at
the option of the Company before January 18, 2011, if the closing price of the Companys common
stock over a specified number of trading days has exceeded 150% of the conversion price, and
anytime thereafter. Before January 18, 2011, the redemption price is equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes plus an amount equal to 8.75% of the principal amount of the notes,
less the amount of any interest actually paid on the notes on or prior to the redemption date.
The notes are due at maturity on January 15, 2024.
The fair value of the 1 1/4% notes as determined by market transactions on September 30, 2008,
was $124.2 million.
Bridging Debt Facility
On October 22, 2007, Bolnisi entered into a $20 million credit facility with Macquarie Bank
Limited to fund further exploration and development of the Palmarejo silver/gold project, the
exploration and development of the Yecora gold/silver project and the El Realito gold/silver
project and for working capital purposes. The credit facility was extended to September 30, 2008,
and had an interest rate at a variable rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 2.45%. The Company paid off
the outstanding balance under the facility on September 30, 2008.
Bank Loan
On August 30, 2007, Palmarejo entered into a temporary credit facility of $2.0 million secured
by the Companys investments in asset-backed commercial paper, to fund working capital
requirements. The facility was amended on October 9, 2007. On June 3, 2008, the Company paid off
the outstanding balance under the credit facility.
NOTE L DEFINED CONTRIBUTION, 401(k), DEFINED BENEFIT AND POST-RETIREMENT MEDICAL PLANS
Defined Contribution Plan and 401(k) Plan
The Company provides a noncontributory defined contribution retirement plan for all eligible
U.S. employees. Total plan expenses recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements
were $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and plan expenses charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 were $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
The Company maintains a savings plan (which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code) covering all eligible U.S. employees. Under the plan, employees may elect to
contribute up to 100% of their cash compensation, subject to ERISA limitations. The Company is
required to make matching cash contributions equal to 100% of the employees contribution to a
maximum of 3% of the employees compensation and 50% of any additional employee contributions in
excess of the 3% to a
maximum of 5% of the employee contribution. Employees have the option of investing in twelve
different types of investment funds. Total plan expenses recognized in the Companys consolidated
financial statements were $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and plan expenses charged to operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
27
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE M COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Labor Union Contracts
The Company maintains three labor agreements in South America, consisting of a labor agreement
with Syndicato de Trabajadores de Compañía Minera Cerro Bayo Ltd. at its Cerro Bayo mine in Chile,
with Associacion Obrera Minera Argentina at its Martha mine in Argentina and with Sindicato De
Trabajadores De Empressa Minera Manquir South America at its San Bartolomé mine in Bolivia. The
agreement at Cerro Bayo is effective from December 24, 2007 to December 21, 2010 and the agreement
at Mina Martha is effective from June 1, 2008 to June 1, 2010. The agreement at San Bartolomé
became effective October 11, 2007 and does not have a fixed term. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company had approximately 35.5% of its worldwide labor force covered by collective bargaining
agreements.
Termination Benefits
In September 2005, the Company established a one-time termination benefit program at the
Rochester mine as the mine approaches the end of its life. The employees are required to render
service until they are terminated in order to be eligible for benefits. Approximately 84% of the
workforce was severed by the end of the first quarter of 2008, while the remaining 16% are expected
to stay on for residual leaching and reclamation activities. As of September 30, 2008, the total
amount expected to be incurred under this plan is approximately $4.9 million. The liability is
recognized ratably over the minimum future service period. The amount accrued as of September 30,
2008 was $0.6 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
Accruals |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,560 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
798 |
|
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not have a written severance plan for any of its foreign operations
including Chile, Argentina, Bolivia and Mexico. However, laws in these foreign jurisdictions
require payment of certain minimum statutory termination benefits. Accordingly, in situations
where minimum statutory termination benefits must be paid to the affected employees, the company
records employee severance costs in accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits. The Company has accrued obligations for postemployment benefits in these
locations of approximately $3.3 million as of September 30, 2008.
Kensington Production Royalty
On July 7, 1995, Coeur, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Alaska, Inc. (Coeur
Alaska), acquired the 50% ownership interest of Echo Bay Exploration Inc. (Echo Bay) in the
Kensington property from Echo Bay and Echo Bay Alaska, Inc. (collectively the Sellers), giving
Coeur 100% ownership of the Kensington property. The property is located on the east side of Lynn
Canal between Juneau and Haines, Alaska. Coeur Alaska is obligated to pay Echo Bay a scaled net
smelter return royalty on 1.0 million ounces of future gold production after Coeur Alaska recoups
the $32.5 million purchase price and its construction and development expenditures incurred after
July 7, 1995 in connection with placing the property into commercial production. The royalty
ranges from 1% at $400 gold prices to a maximum of 2 1/2% at gold prices above $475, with the
royalty to be capped at 1.0 million ounces of production.
28
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE N SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
The Company markets its metals products and concentrates primarily to bullion trading banks
and five third party smelters. These customers then sell the metals to end users for use in
industry applications such as electronic circuitry, jewelry and silverware production and the
manufacture and development of photographic film. Sales of metals to bullion trading banks
amounted to approximately 40.6% and 48.6% of total metals sales for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Generally, the loss of a single bullion trading bank customer
would not adversely affect the Company in view of the liquidity of the markets and availability of
alternative trading banks.
The Company currently markets its silver and gold concentrates to third party smelters in
Japan, Mexico, Australia and Germany. Sales of metals concentrates to third party smelters
amounted to approximately 59.4% and 51.4% of metals sales for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The loss of any one smelter customer could have a material adverse
effect in the event of the possible unavailability of alternative smelters.
NOTE O LITIGATION AND OTHER EVENTS
Federal Court (Alaska) Kensington Project Permit Challenge
On September 12, 2005, three environmental groups (Plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in Federal
District Court in Alaska against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers) and the
U.S. Forest Service (USFS) seeking to invalidate the permit issued to Coeur Alaska, Inc. for the
Companys Kensington mine. The Plaintiffs claim the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit
issued by the Corps of Engineers authorizing the deposition of mine tailings into Lower Slate Lake
conflicts with the CWA. They additionally claim the USFSs approval of the Amended Plan of
Operations is arbitrary and capricious because it relies on the 404 permit issued by the Corps of
Engineers. Following the District Courts remand of the Section 404 permit to the Corps of
Engineers for further review, the Corps reinstated the Companys permit on March 29, 2006. The
lawsuit challenging the permit was re-opened on April 6, 2006; Coeur Alaska filed its answer to the
Amended Complaint; and Coeur Alaska, the State of Alaska, and Goldbelt, Inc., a local native
corporation, were granted Defendant-Intervenor status to join the agencies in their defense of the
permit.
On August 4, 2006, the Federal District Court in Alaska dismissed the Plaintiffs challenge
and upheld the Section 404 permit. On August 7, 2006, the Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of
the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit Court) and on August 9, 2006
the Plaintiffs additionally filed a Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal with the Ninth Circuit
Court. The Ninth Circuit Court granted a temporary injunction pending appeal on August 24, 2006,
enjoining certain activities relating to the lake tailings facility.
29
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
On May 22, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court reversed the District Courts August 4, 2006 decision
which had upheld the Companys 404 permit and issued its opinion that remanded the case to the
District Court with instructions to vacate the Companys 404 permit as well as the USFS Record of
Decision approving the general tailings disposal plan and the Goldbelt 404 permit to construct the
Cascade Point Marine Facility. On August 20, 2007, Coeur Alaska filed a Petition for Rehearing En
Banc with the Ninth Circuit Court, as did the State of Alaska and Goldbelt, Inc. The Department of
Justice, on behalf of the Corps of Engineers, and USFS additionally filed a limited Petition for
Rehearing with the Ninth Circuit Court panel seeking reconsideration of the mandate of the May 22,
2007 panel decision. On October 29, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court denied the Petitions for
Rehearing En Banc. On November 14, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court granted a stay of the mandate
pending further appeal to the Supreme Court, subject to the development of a reclamation plan for
the lake area. The Company and the State of Alaska
filed Petitions for Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States on January 28, 2008.
On June 27, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the State of Alaska and Coeur
Alaskas Petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court. The
Company expects a decision on the case pending with the Supreme Court in the second quarter of
2009. The Company cannot predict if it will prevail in this appeal.
NOTE P CERRO BAYO MINE
On October 31, 2008, the Company announced a temporary suspension of operating activities at
the Cerro Bayo mine due primarily to lower metal prices and continuing higher operating costs. The
Company will temporarily suspend mining operations and undertake efforts to further develop its
mine plan and its ore reserve in an effort to also further extend the mine life.
The Company determined that the decline in the price of silver, reduced production levels and
the increase in operating cost levels was a triggering event in accordance with FAS 144 requiring
the Company to assess whether the long-lived assets at the mine were impaired. Step one of the
impairment assessment compares the cumulative undiscounted prospective cash flows of the mine to
the sum of the carrying values of the long-lived assets at Cerro Bayo. Should the carrying values
of the long-lived assets at the mine exceed the sum of those undiscounted future cash flows, a
comparison of the fair value of the asset to its book value is then required. If the fair value is
less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss would be recorded.
In projecting its future cash flows, the Company considers certain assumptions for silver
prices (including current and historical prices, analyst consensus forward prices, as well as the
trailing three-year average silver market prices) and production levels, expected and historical
operating costs and required capital expenditures based on available life of mine plans.
Assumptions underlying future cash flows are subject to significant risk and uncertainty associated
with any differences between specific assumptions and market conditions, such as silver and gold
prices, lower than expected recoverable ounces and/or the Companys operating performance. Based on
the Companys assessment, there was not a required impairment at September 30, 2008. Should silver
prices continue below the consensus forward or historical prices, should the cash costs per ounce
exceed those projected and historically achieved, or should an updated reserve report result in a
reduction of the number of ounces recoverable at Cerro Bayo, the Company may be required to record
an impairment loss and that loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations
and financial position. The Company will be updating its reserve reports as of December 31, 2008.
30
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share, per ounce amounts)
NOTE Q SUBSEQUENT EVENT
$50 Million Senior Secured Floating Rate Convertible Notes
On October 20, 2008, the Company announced that it sold $50 million in aggregate principal
amount of senior secured floating rate convertible notes under an effective shelf registration
statement on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has granted the
purchaser a warrant to purchase up to an additional $25 million aggregate principal amount of
notes. The notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 7.50% per year, provided that in no event will the
annual rate be less than 9.00% or more than 12.00%. Interest is payable, at the Companys option,
in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock. The notes are the Companys
senior secured obligations, ranking equally with all existing and future senior obligations and
ranking senior to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and are secured by certain
assets of the Companys Coeur Rochester, Inc. subsidiary. The notes are convertible into shares of
the Companys common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to the close of business
on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The initial conversion price is
approximately $1.15 per share. The conversion price is subject to standard anti-dilution
protections. The Company intends to use the proceeds of this offering to fund continued
development at the Palmarejo silver/gold project in Mexico. Any additional remaining proceeds may
be used for general corporate purposes.
Kensington Project
On October 1, 2008 the Company announced a temporary curtailment of its development activities
at the Kensington Project until such time as a decision is rendered from the U.S. Supreme Court on
its original tailings plan. Consequently, the Company laid off approximately 50% of its existing
workforce and will pay termination benefits of $0.4 million.
31
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) is designed to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the
perspective of management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other
factors that may affect our future results. We believe it is important to read our MD&A in
conjunction with our Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as well
as other publicly available information.
This document contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to the Companys gold and
silver mining business. The United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
provides a safe harbor for certain forward-looking statements. Operating, exploration and
financial data, and other statements in this document are based on information the Company
believes reasonable, but involve significant risks and uncertainties, including the risks set
forth under Part II Item 1A below, as to future gold and silver prices, costs, ore grades,
estimation of gold and silver reserves, mining and processing conditions, changes that could
result from the Companys future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, the risks and
hazards inherent in the mining business (including environmental hazards, industrial accidents,
weather or geologically related conditions), regulatory and permitting matters, and risks inherent
in the ownership and operation of, or investment in, mining properties or businesses in foreign
countries. Actual results and timetables could vary significantly from the estimates presented.
Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company
disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The MD&A includes references to total cash costs per ounce of silver produced both on an
individual mine basis and on a consolidated basis. Total cash costs per ounce represent a non-
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) measurement that management uses to monitor
and evaluate the performance of its mining operations. A reconciliation of total cash costs per
ounce to U.S. GAAP Production Expenses is also provided herein and should be referred to when
reading the total cash costs per ounce measurement.
General
The results of the Companys operations are significantly affected by the market prices of
silver and gold, which may fluctuate widely and are affected by many factors beyond the Companys
control, including, without limitation, interest rates, expectations regarding inflation, currency
values, governmental decisions regarding the disposal of precious metals stockpiles, global and
regional political and economic conditions, and other factors.
The average price of silver (Handy & Harman) and gold (London Final) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $16.59 and $897.43 per ounce, respectively. The market price of
silver and gold on October 28, 2008 was $8.81 per ounce and $730.50 per ounce, respectively.
Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation is a large primary silver producer located in North America
and is engaged, through its subsidiaries, in the operation and/or ownership, development and
exploration of silver and gold mining properties and companies located primarily within South
America (Chile, Argentina and Bolivia), the United States (Nevada and Alaska), Australia (New
South Wales), Mexico (Chihuahua) and Africa (Tanzania). Coeur dAlene Mines Corporation and its
subsidiaries are hereinafter referred collectively as Coeur or the Company.
32
The Companys business strategy is to capitalize on the ore reserve/mineralized material bases
located at its operating mines and the expertise of its management team to continue as a leading
primary silver production company through long-term, cash flow generating growth. The principal
elements of the Companys business strategy are to: (i) increase the Companys silver production
and reserves; (ii)
decrease cash costs and increase production at the Companys existing silver mining operations;
(iii) transform development-stage properties into producing mines; (iv) acquire operating mines,
mineral interests and exploration and/or development properties with a view to reducing the
Companys cash and total costs, providing short-term positive cash flow return and expanding its
silver production base and reserves; and (v) continue to explore for new silver and gold
discoveries primarily near its existing mine sites and evaluate new opportunities to expand its
production through acquisitions and exploration.
In addition to the matters discussed above with respect to the key factors of the Companys
business strategy, the most important matters on which management is focused include:
|
|
|
San Bartolomé Mine. The Company commenced commercial production on June 27,
2008. Should silver production be lower than expected or if operating costs prove to be
higher than currently estimated, the Companys results of operations will be adversely
affected. Other uncertainties associated with the mine include logistical and other risks
associated with mining in Bolivia. |
|
|
|
|
Palmarejo Project. In December 2007, Coeur completed the acquisition of the
Palmarejo project located in Mexico. Capital expenditures for this property are currently
estimated to be approximately $180 million during 2008 and construction activities there
are underway. The Company completed the final feasibility study in June 2008 and now
considers the mine to be in the development stage. As a result, it has begun to capitalize
mine development expenditures at Palmarejo. The Company currently expects to commence
commercial production during the first quarter of 2009. Any significant increase in the
capital expenditures and/or delay in the commencement of production would adversely affect
the Companys costs and liquidity. |
|
|
|
|
Kensington Mine. The Company has continued in its effort to enable the
Kensington Mine to commence production, including the completion of Kensingtons mill,
related surface facilities and a tunnel connecting the Kensington and Jualin properties.
On June 27, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the State of Alaska and
Coeur Alaskas Petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth
Circuit Court vacating the Companys 404 permit for its tailings facility. Further delay
in the commencement of production at the Kensington Mine would adversely affect the
Companys costs and liquidity. On September 23, 2008 the Company withdrew its request from
federal and state agencies to permit an alternative paste tailings plan. The Company
continues to pursue its original tailings plan which is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court.
A decision on the appeal is expected in the second quarter of 2009. On October 1, 2008 the
Company announced a temporary curtailment of its development activities at the Kensington
Project until such time as a decision is rendered from the U.S. Supreme Court on its
original tailings plan. Consequently, the Company laid off approximately 50% of its
existing workforce and will pay termination benefits of $0.4 million. |
|
|
|
|
Rochester Mine. As scheduled, mining activities at Rochester ceased in August
2007 as the mine entered its residual leaching phase. During the third quarter of 2008,
the Company increased its estimated silver ounces contained in the heap inventory by
approximately 5.4 million ounces. The increase in estimated silver ounces contained in the
heap inventory is due to changes in silver recoveries anticipated for the remainder of the
residual leach phase. Consequently, the Company has extended its residual leaching phase
from 2011 to 2014. The Company continues to explore its options with respect to this
property, including possible recommencement of operating activities related to the
Companys ongoing exploration program. The continued decrease in production in the
residual leaching stage, and ultimate cessation of activities there, will result in a
reduction in net sales.
|
33
|
|
|
Cerro Bayo Mine. The Companys top priority with respect to this mine is to
reduce operating costs and continue to successfully add new ore reserves through
exploration activities. As part of the ongoing operational improvement program at the
Cerro Bayo mine, in April 2008, the Company announced a temporary suspension of mining
operations at this mine in order to upgrade its electrical infrastructure. On May 5, 2008,
the Company announced that the electrical upgrade was completed and the mine resumed
operations. In April 2006, surface preparation and portal construction began to allow
access to the Dagny and Fabiola veins. On October 31, 2008,
the Company announced a temporary suspension of operating activities at the Cerro Bayo mine
due to lower metal prices and higher operating costs experienced in
2008. Reference is made to the discussion set forth in this
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations under Operating Highlights and Statistics
South American Operations Cerro Bayo Mine for a
detailed description of the Companys plans and operations at
this mine. |
Operating Highlights and Statistics
South American Operations
Martha Mine:
Commissioning of a new, standalone 260 tons per day processing facility took place at Martha
during the first half of 2008. As a result, production was hampered by issues related to mill
start-up and a shortage of available spare parts to address these issues. The start-up has been
completed and results continue to improve each month.
Silver production was 816,495 ounces and gold production was 1,028 ounces in the third
quarter of 2008, compared to 543,803 ounces of silver and 1,015 ounces of gold in the third
quarter of 2007. Total cash costs per ounce for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were
$6.73 per ounce, compared to $8.33 per ounce in 2007. The increase in silver production was
primarily due to a 69.9% increase in mill tonnages offset by lower silver ore grades as compared
to ore tonnages and grades in the third quarter of 2007. The decrease in cash costs per ounce
were primarily due to the higher silver ounce production in the three months ended September 30,
2008 compared to 2007.
Silver production was 2,081,573 ounces and gold production was 2,497 ounces in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 1,975,927 ounces of silver and 2,939 ounces of gold in
2007. Total cash costs per ounce for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $7.57 per
ounce, compared to $6.34 per ounce in 2007. The increase in silver production was primarily due
to an increase of 39.8% over tons milled in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
increase in total cash costs per ounce was primarily due to an increase in labor and operating
supplies expenses and mill start-up related issues in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to 2007.
San Bartolomé Mine:
The San Bartolomé Mine commenced commercial production on June 27, 2008. Silver production
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
706,538 and 728,394 ounces of silver, respectively. Total cash costs per ounce for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
were $15.66 per ounce and $15.59 per ounce, respectively. The mine experienced several start-up
delays due to issues with the processing plant. However, the Company believes these issues have
been largely addressed. Operational results continue to improve each month and the Company now
expects production for 2008 to be approximately 3.2 million ounces of silver.
The San Bartolomé mine involves risks that are inherent in any mining venture, as well as
particular risks associated with the location of the mine. Also, managing mining projects in the
altiplano area of Bolivia, where Cerro Rico is located, presents logistical challenges. The
political and cultural differences of Bolivia may also present challenges.
34
The Company obtained a political risk insurance policy from the Overseas Private Insurance
Corporation (OPIC) and another private insurer. The policy is in the amount of approximately
$131 million and covers 85% of any loss arising from expropriation, political violence or currency
inconvertibility. The policy is expected to cost approximately $3.4 million per year, which was
capitalized during the development and construction phases and is now included as a cost of
inventory produced (estimated at approximately $0.21 per ounce of silver produced) over the term of
the policies which expire in 2019 and 2024.
Cerro Bayo Mine:
In late 2007, the Company implemented a recovery plan at Cerro Bayo to address the higher
costs and lower productivity experienced at the mine during the second half of 2007. Key
components of the plan included increased underground mine development to provide more operational
flexibility, reduced workforce, improved workforce training using more efficient mining methods,
organizational restructuring, and a cost improvement program. On April 8, 2008, the Company
announced that, as part of its ongoing operational improvement program, the mine would be upgrading
its electrical infrastructure in both the surface and underground facilities in order to improve
operational reliability and performance, resulting in a temporary suspension of mining operations.
On May 5, 2008, the Company announced the resumption of operating activities at Cerro Bayo and that
the electrical upgrades had been completed. In April 2008, surface preparation and portal
construction began to allow access to the Dagny and Fabiola veins. At the end of the third quarter
of 2008, decline and sublevel development totaled 1,361 meters, including 156 meters on the Fabiola
vein. Approximately 3,000 tonnes of Fabiola vein material was stockpiled at the third quarters
end in preparation for test milling.
During the third quarter of 2008, silver production was 254,638 ounces and gold production
was 2,973 ounces, compared to 424,206 ounces of silver and 7,229 ounces of gold in the third
quarter of 2007. Total cash costs per ounce of silver in the third quarter of 2008 were $19.89
per ounce compared to $15.58 per ounce in 2007. The silver production decrease was primarily due
to a 54.2% decrease in tons mined as a result of lower than expected stope tonnage and grades.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, silver production was 1,031,524 ounces and
gold production was 19,695 ounces, compared to 1,145,654 ounces of silver and 26,874 ounces of
gold in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The silver production decrease was primarily due
to a 21.4% decrease in tons mined as a result of the recovery plan initiated late last year to
improve mine productivity, grade control and organizational efficiency and lower than expected
stope tonnages and grades. Total cash costs per ounce of silver for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were $7.97 per ounce compared to $8.45 per ounce in 2007.
On October 31, 2008, the Company announced a temporary suspension of operating activities at the Cerro Bayo mine due primarily to lower metal prices and continuing higher operating costs. The Company will temporarily suspend mining operations and undertake efforts to further develop its mine plan and its ore reserve in an effort to also further extend the mine life.
The Company determined that the decline in the price of silver, reduced production levels and the increase in operating cost levels was a triggering event in accordance with FAS 144 requiring the Company to assess whether the long-lived assets at the mine were impaired. Step one of the impairment assessment compares the cumulative undiscounted prospective cash flows of the mine to the sum of the carrying values of the long-lived assets at Cerro Bayo. Should the carrying values of the long-lived assets at the mine exceed the sum of those undiscounted future cash flows, a comparison of the fair value of the asset to its book value is then required. If the fair value is less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss would be recorded.
In projecting its future cash flows, the Company considers certain assumptions for silver prices (including current and historical prices, analyst consensus forward prices, as well as the trailing three-year average silver market prices) and production levels, expected and historical operating costs and required capital expenditures based on available life of mine plans. Assumptions underlying future cash flows are subject to significant risk and uncertainty associated with any differences between specific assumptions and market conditions, such as silver and gold prices, lower than expected recoverable ounces and/or the Companys operating performance. Based on the Companys assessment, there was not a required impairment at September 30, 2008. Should silver prices continue below the consensus forward or historical prices, should the cash costs per ounce exceed those projected and historically achieved, or should an updated reserve report result in a reduction of the number of ounces recoverable at Cerro Bayo, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss and that loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations and financial position. The Company will be updating its reserve reports as of December 31, 2008.
35
North American Operations
Rochester Mine:
In August of 2007, mining and crushing operations at the Rochester mine were completed.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company revised its estimates of silver ounces contained in
the heap inventory. Consequently, the Company has extended the anticipated completion of its
residual leaching phase from 2011 to 2014. Silver production was 795,351 ounces and gold
production was 4,983 ounces during the third quarter of 2008 compared to 1,144,622 ounces of
silver and 12,244 ounces of gold in the third quarter of 2007. Total
cash costs per ounce were
$0.72 in the third quarter of 2008 compared to $0.65 per ounce in the three months ended September
30, 2007. The increase in cash costs per ounce is primarily due to lower by-product credits from
the gold produced as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Silver production was 2,374,698 ounces and gold production was 16,895 ounces during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 3,554,651 ounces of silver and 40,679 ounces of gold
in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Total cash costs per ounce decreased to ($0.46) from
$2.72 in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease
in cash costs per ounce is
primarily due to (i) only processing costs are being incurred now that mining activities have
ceased; and (ii) higher by-product credits from higher gold prices in 2008 as compared to the same
period in 2007.
Australian Operations
Endeavor Mine:
Silver production at the Endeavor mine in the third quarter of 2008 was 226,180 ounces of
silver compared to 171,834 ounces of silver in the third quarter of 2007. This 31.6% increase in
silver production was primarily due to a 6.3% increase in tons milled and a 15% increase in silver
ore grades as compared to the third quarter of 2007. Total cash costs per ounce of silver produced
were $2.53 in the third quarter of 2008 compared to $2.65 in the third quarter of 2007. The
decrease in cash costs per ounce is primarily due to the increase in the ounces of silver produced
during the period.
Silver production at the Endeavor mine for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
683,470 ounces of silver compared to 456,552 ounces of silver in the nine months ended September
30, 2007. This 49.7% increase in silver production was primarily due to a 40.2% increase in silver
ore grades as compared to the third quarter of 2007. Total cash costs per ounce of silver produced
were $2.49 in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $2.91 in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in cash costs per ounce is primarily due to the increase in ounces
of silver produced during the period as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
36
On May 23, 2005, the Company acquired all of the silver production and reserves, up to a
maximum of 17.7 million payable ounces, contained at the Endeavor Mine in Australia, which is owned
and operated by Cobar Operations Pty. Limited (Cobar), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBH Resources
Ltd. (CBH), for $43.7 million. The Endeavor Mine is located 720 km northwest of Sydney in New
South Wales and has been in production since 1983. Under the terms of the original agreement, CDE
Australia, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coeur, paid Cobar $15.4 million of cash at the closing. In
addition, CDE Australia will pay Cobar approximately $26.2 million upon the receipt of a report
confirming that the reserves at the Endeavor mine are equal to or greater than the reported ore
reserves for 2004. In January 2008, the mine met the criteria for payment of the additional $26.2
million and this amount was capitalized to mineral interests. On April 1, 2008, the Company paid
this amount plus accrued interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum from January 24, 2008. In addition to
these upfront
payments, Coeur originally committed to pay Cobar an operating cost contribution of $1.00 for
each ounce of payable silver plus a further increment when the price of silver exceeds $5.23 per
ounce. This further increment was to have begun on the second anniversary of the agreement and is
50% of the amount by which the silver price exceeds $5.23 per ounce. A cost contribution of $0.25
per ounce is also payable by Coeur in respect of new ounces of proven and probable silver reserves
as they are discovered. During the first quarter of 2007, $2.0 million was paid for additional
ounces of proven and probable silver reserves under the terms of the contract. This amount was
capitalized as a cost of the mineral interest acquired and is being amortized using the units of
production method.
On March 28, 2006, CDE Australia Pty, Ltd. (CDE Australia) reached an agreement with CBH
Resources Ltd. to modify the terms of the original silver purchase agreement. Under the modified
terms, CDE Australia owns all silver production and reserves up to a maximum of 20.0 million
payable ounces, up from 17.7 million payable ounces in the original agreement. The conditions
relating to the second payment were also modified and tied to certain paste fill plant performance
criteria and mill throughput tests. The Company has received approximately 2.0 million payable
ounces to date and the current ore reserve contains approximately 14.4 million payable ounces based
on current metallurgical recovery and current smelter contract terms. Expansion of the ore reserve
will be required to achieve the maximum payable ounces of silver production as set forth in the
modified contract. It is expected that future expansion to the ore reserve will occur as a result
of the conversion of portions of the propertys existing inventory of mineralized material and
future exploration discoveries. CBH conducts regular exploration to discover new mineralization
and to define reserves from surface and underground drilling platforms. The silver price-sharing
provision is deferred until such time as Coeur has received approximately 2 million cumulative
ounces of silver from the mine or June 2007, whichever is later. In addition, the silver
price-sharing threshold increased to US$7.00 per ounce, from the previous level of US$5.23 per
ounce. The Company expects to exceed the 2 million cumulative ounce threshold during the fourth
quarter of 2008 and, therefore, the Company will realize a reduction in revenues per ounce as a
result of the silver price-sharing provision. The Endeavor mine is a primary zinc and lead producer. During 2008, the prices for zinc
and lead have declined which could impact CBHs ability to further expand the ore reserves.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company has recovered approximately 40.8% of the transaction
consideration consisting of 2.0 million payable ounces, or 10.0%, of the 20 million maximum payable
silver ounces to which the Company is entitled under the terms of the silver sale and purchase
agreement. No assurances can be made that the mine will achieve its 20 million payable silver
ounce target to which the Company is entitled under the terms of the silver sale and purchase
agreement.
Broken Hill Mine:
Silver production at the Broken Hill Mine in the third quarter of 2008 was 312,425 ounces
compared to 427,254 ounces in the third quarter of 2007. The decrease in silver production is
primarily due to a decrease in silver ore grades and recoveries, partially offset by an increase in
tons mined. Total cash costs per ounce of silver production were $3.38 in the third quarter of 2008
compared to $3.10 in the third quarter of 2007. The increase is primarily due to higher smelting,
refining and transportation costs.
Silver production at the Broken Hill Mine in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
1,081,254 ounces compared to 1,206,595 ounces in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
decrease in silver production is primarily due to a 18.5% decrease in silver ore grades. Total cash
costs per ounce of silver production were $3.60 in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to $3.16 in 2007. The increase is primarily due to higher smelting, refining and
transportation costs.
37
On September 8, 2005, the Company acquired all of the silver production and reserves, up to a
maximum of 17.2 million payable ounces (24.5 million contained ounces), contained at the Broken
Hill mine in Australia, which is owned and operated by Perilya Broken Hill Ltd. (PBH) for $36.9
million. In addition, CDE Australia pays PBH an operating cost contribution of approximately $2.00
for each ounce of payable silver. Under the terms of the agreement, PBH may earn up to US$0.75
million per year of additional consideration by meeting certain silver production thresholds. No
additional payments pursuant to production thresholds were made during the third quarter of 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company has recovered approximately 116.7% of the transaction
consideration consisting of 5.1 million payable ounces, or 29.9%, of the 17.2 million payable
silver ounces to which the Company is entitled to under the terms of the silver sale agreement. No
assurances can be made that the mine will achieve its 17.2 million payable silver ounce target to
which the Company is entitled under the terms of the silver sale and purchase agreement.
On August 21, 2008, Perilya advised the market that, following an extensive review of its
Broken Hill operations, it had implemented a plan to resize the operation in light of current low
metal prices. Under the revised operating plan, ore production will decrease from 1.8 to 0.95
million tonnes per year.
38
Operating Statistics From Continuing Operations
The following table presents information by mine and consolidated sales information for the
three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Rochester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
911,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,861,935 |
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Ore grade/Au oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Recovery/Ag oz (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
244.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.9 |
% |
Recovery/Au oz (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135.3 |
% |
Silver production ounces |
|
|
795,351 |
|
|
|
1,144,622 |
|
|
|
2,374,698 |
|
|
|
3,554,651 |
|
Gold production ounces |
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
40,679 |
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
5.51 |
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons milled |
|
|
50,253 |
|
|
|
105,767 |
|
|
|
208,837 |
|
|
|
263,312 |
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
5.52 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
Ore grade/Au oz |
|
|
0.066 |
|
|
|
0.076 |
|
|
|
0.104 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Recovery/Ag oz |
|
|
91.8 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Recovery/Au oz |
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
90.3 |
% |
|
|
92.7 |
% |
Silver production ounces |
|
|
254,638 |
|
|
|
424,206 |
|
|
|
1,031,524 |
|
|
|
1,145,654 |
|
Gold production ounces |
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
7,229 |
|
|
|
19,695 |
|
|
|
26,874 |
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
19.89 |
|
|
$ |
15.58 |
|
|
$ |
7.97 |
|
|
$ |
8.45 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
26.25 |
|
|
$ |
18.92 |
|
|
$ |
14.34 |
|
|
$ |
12.09 |
|
Martha Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons milled |
|
|
15,940 |
|
|
|
9,382 |
|
|
|
38,087 |
|
|
|
27,246 |
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
54.40 |
|
|
|
60.10 |
|
|
|
57.35 |
|
|
|
76.27 |
|
Ore grade/Au oz |
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
|
0.118 |
|
|
|
0.072 |
|
|
|
0.116 |
|
Recovery/Ag oz |
|
|
94.2 |
% |
|
|
96.5 |
% |
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
Recovery/Au oz |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
|
|
91.7 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
92.8 |
% |
Silver production ounces |
|
|
816,495 |
|
|
|
543,803 |
|
|
|
2,081,573 |
|
|
|
1,975,927 |
|
Gold production ounces |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
6.73 |
|
|
$ |
8.33 |
|
|
$ |
7.57 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
8.27 |
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
|
$ |
6.83 |
|
Endeavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons milled |
|
|
298,601 |
|
|
|
280,978 |
|
|
|
827,755 |
|
|
|
818,844 |
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Recovery/Ag oz |
|
|
51.8 |
% |
|
|
48.3 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
Silver production ounces |
|
|
226,180 |
|
|
|
171,834 |
|
|
|
683,470 |
|
|
|
456,552 |
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
4.94 |
|
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
4.72 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
Broken Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons milled |
|
|
496,552 |
|
|
|
472,531 |
|
|
|
1,523,719 |
|
|
|
1,221,918 |
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
Recovery/Ag oz |
|
|
74.2 |
% |
|
|
80.4 |
% |
|
|
73.0 |
% |
|
|
83.3 |
% |
Silver production ounces |
|
|
312,425 |
|
|
|
427,254 |
|
|
|
1,081,254 |
|
|
|
1,206,595 |
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
3.60 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
5.15 |
|
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
|
$ |
5.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
San Bartolomé (B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons milled |
|
|
160,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ore grade/Ag oz |
|
|
7.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery/Ag oz |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Silver production ounces |
|
|
706,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash cost/oz |
|
$ |
15.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
18.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
PRODUCTION TOTALS
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver ounces |
|
|
3,111,627 |
|
|
|
2,711,719 |
|
|
|
7,980,913 |
|
|
|
8,339,379 |
|
Gold ounces |
|
|
8,984 |
|
|
|
20,488 |
|
|
|
39,087 |
|
|
|
70,492 |
|
Cash cost per oz/silver |
|
$ |
7.65 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
$ |
4.99 |
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
Total cost/oz |
|
$ |
9.70 |
|
|
$ |
6.82 |
|
|
$ |
7.19 |
|
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
CONSOLIDATED SALES TOTALS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver ounces sold |
|
|
2,552,038 |
|
|
|
2,984,932 |
|
|
|
7,234,943 |
|
|
|
8,466,845 |
|
Gold ounces sold |
|
|
11,215 |
|
|
|
22,249 |
|
|
|
41,145 |
|
|
|
72,401 |
|
Realized
price per silver ounce(C) |
|
$ |
14.47 |
|
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
Realized
price per gold
ounce(C) |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The leach cycle at Rochester requires 5 to 10 years to recover gold and silver
contained in the ore. The Company estimates the ultimate recovery to be approximately 61.5%
for silver and 93% for gold. However, ultimate recoveries will not be known until leaching
operations cease, which is currently estimated for 2014. Current recovery may vary
significantly from ultimate recovery. In August 2007, the Company ceased mining and crushing
activities and ore reserves were fully mined. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Ore on Leach Pad. |
|
(B) |
|
San Bartolomé commenced start-up activities on June 27, 2008. Mine statistics do
not represent normal operating results. It is expected that the Company will achieve normal
operating levels by the end of 2008. |
|
(C) |
|
Units sold at realized metal prices will not match reported metal sales due
primarily to the effects on revenues of mark-to-market adjustments on embedded derivatives in
the Companys provisionally priced sales contracts. |
39
Cash Costs per Ounce are calculated by dividing the cash costs computed for each of the
Companys mining properties for a specified period by the amount of gold ounces or silver ounces
produced by that property during that same period. Management uses cash costs per ounce as a key
indicator of the profitability of each of its mining properties. Gold and silver are sold and
priced in the world financial markets on a US dollar per ounce basis.
Cash Costs are costs directly related to the physical activities of producing silver and gold,
and include mining, processing and other plant costs, third-party refining and smelting costs,
marketing expense, on-site general and administrative costs, royalties, in-mine drilling
expenditures that are related to production and other direct costs. Sales of by-product metals are
deducted from the above in computing cash costs. Cash costs exclude depreciation, depletion and
amortization, corporate, general and administrative expense, exploration, interest, and
pre-feasibility costs and accruals for mine reclamation. Cash costs are calculated and presented
using the Gold Institute Production Cost Standard applied consistently for all periods presented.
Total cash costs per ounce is a non-GAAP measurement and investors are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on it and are urged to read all GAAP accounting disclosures presented in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying footnotes. In addition, see the reconciliation of cash
costs to production costs set forth below.
The following tables present a reconciliation between non-GAAP cash costs per ounce to GAAP
production costs applicable to sales reported in the Statement of Operations:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands except ounces and per ounce costs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
|
Martha |
|
|
Endeavor |
|
|
Broken Hill |
|
|
San Bartolomé |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of Silver (ounces) |
|
|
795,351 |
|
|
|
254,638 |
|
|
|
816,495 |
|
|
|
226,180 |
|
|
|
312,425 |
|
|
|
706,538 |
|
|
|
3,111,627 |
|
Cash Costs per ounce |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
19.89 |
|
|
$ |
6.73 |
|
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
15.66 |
|
|
$ |
7.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Costs |
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
5,064 |
|
|
$ |
5,491 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
11,065 |
|
|
$ |
23,818 |
|
Add/Subtract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party smelting costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
By-product credit |
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,894 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Change in inventory |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5,544 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
$ |
12,134 |
|
|
$ |
10,150 |
|
|
$ |
5,488 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
$ |
7,315 |
|
|
$ |
37,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands except ounces and per ounce costs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
|
Martha |
|
|
Endeavor |
|
|
Broken Hill |
|
|
San Bartolomé |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of Silver (ounces) |
|
|
2,374,698 |
|
|
|
1,031,524 |
|
|
|
2,081,573 |
|
|
|
683,470 |
|
|
|
1,081,254 |
|
|
|
728,394 |
|
|
|
7,980,913 |
|
Cash Costs per ounce |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
|
$ |
7.97 |
|
|
$ |
7.57 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
$ |
3.60 |
|
|
$ |
15.59 |
|
|
$ |
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Costs |
|
$ |
(1,085 |
) |
|
$ |
8,220 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
3,892 |
|
|
$ |
11,353 |
|
|
$ |
39,848 |
|
Add/Subtract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party smelting costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,131 |
) |
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,395 |
) |
By-product credit |
|
|
15,213 |
|
|
|
17,984 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,425 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618 |
|
Change in inventory |
|
|
21,099 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
(3,489 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(5,891 |
) |
|
|
13,356 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
6,571 |
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
16,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales |
|
$ |
37,098 |
|
|
$ |
31,167 |
|
|
$ |
15,805 |
|
|
$ |
2,305 |
|
|
$ |
4,070 |
|
|
$ |
7,315 |
|
|
$ |
97,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
(In thousands except ounces and per ounce costs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
|
Martha |
|
|
Endeavor |
|
|
Broken Hill |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of Silver (ounces) |
|
|
1,144,622 |
|
|
|
424,206 |
|
|
|
543,803 |
|
|
|
171,834 |
|
|
|
427,254 |
|
|
|
2,711,719 |
|
Cash Costs per ounce |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
15.58 |
|
|
$ |
8.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Costs |
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,532 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
13,663 |
|
Add/Subtract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party smelting costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
(2,097 |
) |
By-product credit |
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,936 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
Change in inventory |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
11,552 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
4,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable
to sales, including
depreciation, depletion and
amortization (GAAP) |
|
$ |
19,908 |
|
|
$ |
16,012 |
|
|
$ |
5,185 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
$ |
43,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
(In thousands except ounces and per ounce costs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester |
|
|
Cerro Bayo |
|
|
Martha |
|
|
Endeavor |
|
|
Broken Hill |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of Silver (ounces) |
|
|
3,554,651 |
|
|
|
1,145,654 |
|
|
|
1,975,927 |
|
|
|
456,552 |
|
|
|
1,206,595 |
|
|
|
8,339,379 |
|
Cash Costs per ounce |
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
$ |
8.45 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
9,673 |
|
|
$ |
9,682 |
|
|
$ |
12,531 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
$ |
3,809 |
|
|
$ |
37,023 |
|
Add/Subtract: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party smelting costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,352 |
) |
|
|
(1,402 |
) |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
|
(6,115 |
) |
By-product credit (1) |
|
|
27,028 |
|
|
|
17,827 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,817 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
Change in inventory |
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
6,438 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
17,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs applicable to
sales, including depreciation,
depletion and amortization
(GAAP) |
|
$ |
52,744 |
|
|
$ |
30,963 |
|
|
$ |
14,574 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
103,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Exploration Activity
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company incurred costs of
approximately $5.8 and $14.3 million, respectively, related to its global exploration program
including drilling and related costs of $0.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, capitalized as
mine development. The majority of this was devoted to exploration around its large operating
properties.
Cerro Bayo Mine (Chile)
Exploration at Cerro Bayo during the third quarter of 2008 focused on reserve
development/delineation drilling and discovery of new mineralization at the Coigues Este area,
which occurs about one kilometer east of the mill facility. A new vein system, termed Delia, was
discovered this quarter under barren rock and post-mineral sediment between Coigues Este and the
mill facility. Approximately 15,450 meters (50,700 feet) were drilled in the third quarter.
Positive results were
received from several targets which are expected to result in additional reserves and
mineralized material as part of the exploration and ore reserve development program for 2009.
Martha Mine (Argentina)
At Martha, 5,200 meters (17,200 feet) of drilling was completed during the third quarter of
2008 to expand reserves and discover new mineralization. The focus of this work was at the Martha
mine and the new Betty and Isabel vein systems to the north of the mine. Drilling will continue
throughout the year on these and other targets in the Martha mine district.
In addition to its exploration program near the Martha mine, the Company also conducts
exploration in other parts of the Santa Cruz province of Argentina. In the third quarter of 2008,
the Company focused this effort on the Sascha and Aguila properties. Sascha is one of two
properties on which the Company has an option to acquire a majority joint venture interest with
Mirasol Resources Ltd. Aguila is controlled by the Company under an option to purchase agreement
with private Argentina business interests.
Palmarejo (Mexico)
Exploration is underway at the Companys new Palmarejo property in the Sierra Madre Occidental
of northern Mexico. The focus of this work was drilling on the Guadalupe deposit designed to
expand the size of the known silver and gold mineralization. Approximately 6,800 meters (22,200
feet) of drilling was completed in the quarter. The Company is planning to continue its drilling
activities in the fourth quarter of the year with the main focus to be on the Guadalupe and
Palmarejo zones and on the Los Bancos exploration target which lies
to the southeast of Palmarejo.
In other parts of Mexico, the Company conducted mapping and exploration on its
exploration-stage Yecora, El Realito and La Guitarra properties. Based on results received, a
future drilling program is being designed for Yecora.
Rochester (USA)
This quarter the Company commenced an exploration drilling program at its wholly-owned
Rochester mine in Nevada, USA to confirm and expand mineralized material that exists peripheral to
the Rochester and Nevada Packard deposits. In addition, a drill program to test the high-grade,
structurally, controlled Mystic target to the northwest of Nevada Packard was also designed and
will commence in the following quarter. For the third quarter, approximately 4,200 meters (13,900
feet) of drilling were completed.
Tanzania (Africa)
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company continued exploration on its properties in the Lake
Victoria Goldfields District of northern Tanzania, consisting of additional mapping, sampling,
structural geology studies and data modeling to refine the next phase of drilling. Drilling
commenced at Kiziba Hill this quarter where nearly 3,000 meters (9,700 feet) were completed.
42
Development Projects:
Palmarejo (Mexico)
On December 21, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Bolnisi Gold NL
(Bolnisi), an Australian company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, and Palmarejo Silver
and Gold Corporation (Palmarejo), a Canadian company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. The
principal asset of Bolnisi was its ownership of 72.8% of the outstanding common shares of
Palmarejo, which was actively exploring the Palmarejo project and other exploration stage
properties in Mexico.
Coeur is currently constructing the Palmarejo project and expects to commence commercial production
in the first quarter of 2009.
The Palmarejo project is located in the state of Chihuahua in northern Mexico. The Palmarejo
projects consists of approximately 12,115 hectares covered by mining concessions, of which about
11,817 hectares are owned outright by Planet Gold, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with
an additional 226 hectares held by means of leases and options to purchase, which agreements are
summarized below. In addition, Planet Gold has obtained the rights to, but has not yet made all
payments to complete, the purchase of 72 additional hectares. In addition to the Palmarejo
project, the Company also acquired the Yecora exploration-stage property located in Sonora, on the
border with Chihuahua and the El Realito and La Guitarra exploration-stage properties in Chihuahua.
The Palmarejo project contains a number of mineralized zones or areas of interest. The most
important of these to date is the Palmarejo zone in the far north of the concessions based on the
northwest-southeast trending La Prieta and La Blanca gold-silver bearing structures. In addition to
Palmarejo, mineralized vein and alteration systems have been identified in the district, roughly
sub-parallel to the Palmarejo zone. The most significant of these additional targets are the
Guadalupe (including Animas) and La Patria vein systems in the southern part of the property and
such systems are currently under investigation by the Companys exploration teams.
On June 10, 2008, Coeur announced the results of a feasibility study for the Palmarejo
silver/gold open pit/underground project. The feasibility study reflects results from geologic,
engineering and economic analyses for only the Palmarejo deposit. The Company expects to update
the results of this study later this year to reflect results from its ongoing exploration and
development work this year, which it expects will further increase ore reserves, mineralized
material, production levels, mine life and cash flow.
This study established the first proven and probable mineral reserve for the Palmarejo
project. This initial ore reserve consists of 62.4 million silver ounces and 0.75 million gold
ounces.
Capital costs to achieve commercial production at Palmarejo were also updated as part of the
feasibility study. These capital costs are expected to be approximately $180 million in 2008 and
the Company expects to spend approximately $120 million in 2009 to achieve commercial production.
Production is expected to commence during the first quarter of 2009, with silver production
anticipated to be 5.1 million ounces and gold production estimated to be 67,000 ounces during this
initial year of operations. This feasibility study based on $11/oz silver prices and $600/oz
gold prices and solely on production from the immediate Palmarejo area anticipates an initial
mine life of nine years. On average, cash costs per ounce of silver are expected to be negative
over the life of the mine as a result of the gold by-product credit. No assurances can be made
that the project will achieve its schedule, production or cost estimates.
43
The Company has budgeted over $8.0 million for exploration at the Palmarejo District in 2008,
its first year of exploration since completion of the acquisition, in an attempt to discover new
silver and gold mineralization and define new ore reserves.
Kensington (Alaska)
The Kensington property, which contains the projects reserves, consists of over 6,100 acres
of patented (750 acres) and unpatented federal mining claims and state claims. The adjacent Jualin
property to the south consists of 9,236 acres of patented and unpatented federal mining claims and
state claims.
On July 7, 1995, Coeur, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Alaska, Inc. (Coeur
Alaska), acquired the 50% ownership interest of Echo Bay Exploration Inc. (Echo Bay) in the
Kensington property from Echo Bay and Echo Bay Alaska, Inc. (collectively the Sellers), giving
Coeur 100% ownership of the Kensington property. The property is located on the east side of Lynn
Canal between Juneau and Haines, Alaska. Coeur Alaska is obligated to pay Echo Bay a scaled net
smelter return royalty on 1.0 million ounces of future gold production after Coeur Alaska recoups
the $32.5 million purchase price and its construction and development expenditures incurred after
July 7, 1995 in connection with placing the property into commercial production. The royalty
ranges from 1% at $400 gold prices to a maximum of 2 1/2% at gold prices above $475, with the royalty
to be capped at 1.0 million ounces of production.
On September 12, 2005, three environmental groups (Plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in Federal
District Court in Alaska against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers) and the
U.S. Forest Service (USFS) seeking to invalidate the permit issued to Coeur Alaska, Inc. for the
Companys Kensington mine. The Plaintiffs claim the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit
issued by the Corps of Engineers authorizing the deposition of mine tailings into Lower Slate Lake
conflicts with the CWA. They additionally claim the USFSs approval of the Amended Plan of
Operations is arbitrary and capricious because it relies on the 404 permit issued by the Corps of
Engineers. Following the District Courts remand of the Section 404 permit to the Corps of
Engineers for further review, the Corps reinstated the Companys permit on March 29, 2006. The
lawsuit challenging the permit was re-opened on April 6, 2006; Coeur Alaska filed its answer to the
Amended Complaint; and Coeur Alaska, the State of Alaska, and Goldbelt, Inc., a local native
corporation, were granted Defendant-Intervenor status to join the agencies in their defense of the
permit.
On August 4, 2006, the Federal District Court in Alaska dismissed the Plaintiffs challenge
and upheld the Section 404 permit. On August 7, 2006, the Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of
the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit Court) and on August 9, 2006
the Plaintiffs additionally filed a Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal with the Ninth Circuit
Court. The Ninth Circuit Court granted a temporary injunction pending appeal on August 24, 2006,
enjoining certain activities relating to the lake tailings facility.
On May 22, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court reversed the District Courts August 4, 2006 decision
which had upheld the Companys 404 permit and issued its opinion that remanded the case to the
District Court with instructions to vacate the Companys 404 permit as well as the USFS Record of
Decision approving the general tailings disposal plan and the Goldbelt 404 permit to construct the
Cascade Point Marine Facility. On August 20, 2007, Coeur Alaska filed a Petition for Rehearing En
Banc with the Ninth Circuit Court, as did the State of Alaska and Goldbelt, Inc. The Department of
Justice, on behalf of the Corps of Engineers, and USFS additionally filed a limited Petition for
Rehearing with the Ninth Circuit Court panel seeking reconsideration of the mandate of the May 22,
2007 panel decision. On October 29, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court denied the Petitions for
Rehearing En Banc. On November 14, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court granted a stay of the mandate
pending further appeal to the Supreme Court, subject to the development of a reclamation plan for
the lake area. The Company and the State of Alaska filed Petitions for Certiorari to the Supreme
Court of the United States on January 28, 2008. On June 27, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United
States granted the State of Alaska and Coeur Alaskas Petitions for a writ of certiorari to review
the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court. The Company expects a decision on the case pending with
the Supreme Court in the second quarter of 2009. The Company cannot predict if it will prevail in
this appeal.
44
On September 23, 2008 the Company requested that the Forest Service terminate the permitting
process for a potential alternative Kensington paste tailings plan. The Company continues to
pursue its original tailings plan which is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. A decision on the
appeal is expected in the second quarter of 2009. On October 1, 2008 the Company announced a
temporary curtailment of its development activities at the Kensington Project until such time as a
decision is rendered from the U.S. Supreme Court on its original tailings plan. Consequently, the
Company laid off approximately 50% of its existing workforce and will pay termination benefits of
$0.4 million.
The Kensington litigation has contributed to an increase in capital costs. Total expenditures
by the Company at the Kensington property in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
were $12.9 million and $32.3 million, respectively. Such expenditures were used to continue the
permitting and development activities. Based upon the Companys current estimates, an impairment writedown
could be necessary should the expectation of the long-term price for gold decrease below
approximately $667 per ounce. As of September 30, 2008, the carrying value of the Kensington
projects long-lived assets was $331.4 million.
The Company believes that commercial production could commence in late 2009, subject to
successful resolution of the litigation issues described above and completion of associated
construction of the tailings facility. No assurances can be made that the project will achieve its
schedule and cost estimates as discussed above. Further, no assurance can be given as to whether or
when regulatory permits and approvals granted to the Company may be further challenged, appealed or
contested by third parties or issuing agencies, or as to whether the Company will ultimately place
the Kensington project into commercial production.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management considers the following policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments
that are involved in preparing the Companys consolidated financial statements and the
uncertainties that could impact its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our
consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates
and assumptions made by management during their preparation. We have identified the policies below
as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based
on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of these statements
requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We base
these estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we consider reasonable under the
circumstances; however, reported results could differ from those based on the current estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. The impact and any associated risks related to these
policies on our business operations are discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The areas requiring the use of managements
estimates and assumptions relate to recoverable ounces from proven and probable reserves that are
the basis of future cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation and amortization
calculations; useful lives utilized for depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of
future cash flows for long lived assets; estimates of recoverable gold and silver ounces in ore on
leach pad; reclamation and remediation costs; valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; and
post-employment and other employee benefit liabilities. For a detailed discussion on the
application of these and other accounting policies, see Note B in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
45
Revenue Recognition. Revenue includes sales value received for our principal product, silver, and
associated by-product revenues from the sale of by-product metals consisting primarily of gold and
copper. Revenue is recognized when title to silver and gold passes to the buyer and when
collectibility is reasonably assured. The passing of title to the customer is based on terms of
the sales contract. Product pricing is determined at the point revenue is recognized by reference
to active and freely traded commodity markets, for example, the London Bullion Market for both gold
and silver, in an identical form to the product sold.
Under our concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, final gold and silver prices
are set on a specified future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment
date based on market metal prices. Revenues are recorded under these contracts at the time title
passes to the buyer based on the forward price for the expected settlement period. The contracts,
in general, provide for a provisional payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal
prices. Final settlement is based on the average applicable price for a specified future period,
and generally occurs from three to six months after shipment. Final sales are settled using
smelter weights, settlement assays (average of assays exchanged and/or umpire assay results) and
are priced as specified in the smelter contract. The
Companys provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be
separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from
the sale of concentrates at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does
not qualify for hedge accounting. The embedded derivative is recorded as a derivative asset in
prepaid expenses and other, or a derivative liability on the balance sheet and is adjusted to fair
value through revenue each period until the date of final gold and silver settlement. The form of
the material being sold, after deduction for smelting and refining is in an identical form to that
sold on the London Bullion Market. The form of the product is metal in flotation concentrate,
which is the final process for which the Company is responsible.
The effects of forward sales contracts are reflected in revenue at the date the related
precious metals are delivered or the contracts expire. Third party smelting and refining costs are
recorded as a reduction of revenue.
At September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of $58.9
million, consisting of 2.5 million ounces of silver and 19,710 ounces of gold which had a fair
value of approximately $52.8 million including the embedded derivative. For each one cent per
ounce change in realized silver price, revenue would vary (plus or minus) approximately $25,000;
and for each one dollar per ounce change in realized gold price, revenue would vary (plus or minus)
approximately $19,700. At September 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced
sales of $62.0 million consisting of 3.5 million ounces of silver and 24,350 ounces of gold. For
each one cent per ounce change in realized silver price, revenue would vary (plus or minus)
approximately $35,000; and for each one dollar per ounce change in realized gold price, revenue
would vary (plus or minus) approximately $24,400.
Estimates. The preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not
differ from those estimates. The most critical accounting principles upon which the Companys
financial status depends are those requiring estimates of recoverable ounces from proven and
probable reserves and/or assumptions of future commodity prices. There are a number of
uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond our
control. Ore reserves estimates are based upon engineering evaluations of samplings of drill holes
and other openings. These estimates involve assumptions regarding future silver and gold prices,
the geology of our mines, the mining methods we use and the related costs we incur to develop and
mine our reserves. Changes in these assumptions could result in material adjustments to our
reserve estimates. We use reserve estimates in determining the units-of-production depreciation
and amortization expense, as well as in evaluating mine asset impairments.
46
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We utilize the
methodology set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to evaluate the recoverability of its assets. An
impairment is considered to exist if total estimated future cash flows or probability-weighted cash
flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the assets, including property,
plant and equipment, mineral property, development property, and any deferred costs. The
accounting estimates related to impairment are critical accounting estimates because the future
cash flows used to determine whether an impairment exists is dependent on reserve estimates and
other assumptions, including silver and gold prices, production levels, and capital and reclamation
costs, all of which are based on detailed engineering life-of-mine plans. An impairment loss
exists when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any impairment loss recognized represents
the excess of the assets carrying value as compared to its estimated fair value. The Company
reviews the carrying value of its assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of its assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company did not record any
write-downs during the periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
We depreciate our property, plant and equipment, mining properties and mine development using the
units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on our proven and probable
recoverable reserves or on a straight-line basis over the useful life, whichever is shorter. The
accounting estimates related to depreciation and amortization are critical accounting estimates
because 1) the determination of reserves involves uncertainties with respect to the ultimate
geology of our reserves and the assumptions used in determining the economic feasibility of mining
those reserves and 2) changes in estimated proven and probable reserves and useful asset lives can
have a material impact on net income.
Ore on leach pad. The Rochester Mine utilized the heap leach process to extract silver and
gold from ore. The heap leach process is a process of extracting silver and gold by placing ore on
an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the
contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.
The Company used several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore
placed on the leach pads. As the ore body was drilled in preparation for the blasting process,
samples are taken of the drill residue which is assayed to determine estimated quantities of
contained metal. The Company estimated the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning
satellite survey techniques. The Company then processed the ore through crushing facilities where
the output was again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the
data collected from the mining operation was completed with appropriate adjustments made to
previous estimates. The crushed ore was then transported to the leach pad for application of the
leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously
sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the
leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to dorè, which
is the final product produced by the mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or market,
with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.
Our reported inventories include metals estimated to be contained in the ore on leach pad of
$32.3 million as of September 30, 2008. Of this amount, $9.3 million is reported as a current asset
and $22.9 million is reported as a non-current asset. The distinction between current and
non-current is based upon the expected length of time necessary for the leaching process to remove
the metals from the broken ore. The historical cost of the metal that is expected to be extracted
within twelve months is classified as current and the historical cost of metals contained within
the broken ore that will be extracted beyond twelve months is classified as noncurrent. The ore on
leach pad inventory is stated at actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the
leach pad during the current period, adjusted for the effects on monthly production costs of
abnormal production levels.
47
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time, and the quantity of metal that
may be extracted relative to such twelve-month period, requires the use of estimates which are
inherently inaccurate since they rely upon laboratory testwork. Testwork consists of 60-day leach
columns from which we project metal recoveries into the future. The quantities of metal contained
in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process
extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory column tests and actual
experience occurring over approximately twenty years of leach pad operation at the Rochester Mine.
The assumptions we use to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion
process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. We
periodically review our estimates compared to actual experience and revise our estimates when
appropriate. However, the ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease,
which is currently estimated for 2014.
When we began operations at the Rochester mine in 1986, based solely on laboratory testing, we
estimated the ultimate recovery of silver and gold at 50% and 80%, respectively. Since 1986, we
have adjusted the expected ultimate recovery 3 times (once in each of 1989, 1997 and 2003) based
upon actual experience gained from leach operations. In 1989, we increased our estimated
recoveries for silver and gold to 55% and 85%, respectively. The change was accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate, which had the effect of increasing the estimated recoverable
ounces of silver and gold contained in the heap by 1.6 million ounces and 10,000 ounces,
respectively. In 1997, we revised our estimated
recoveries for silver and gold to 59% and 89%, respectively, which increased the estimated
recoverable ounces of silver and gold contained in the heap by 4.7 million ounces and 39,000
ounces, respectively. In 2003, we revised our estimated recoveries for silver and gold to 61.5%
and 93%, respectively, which increased the estimated recoverable ounces of silver and gold
contained in the heap by 1.8 million ounces and 41,000 ounces, respectively. During the third
quarter of 2008, the Company increased its estimated silver ounces contained in the heap inventory
by 5.4 million ounces. The increase in estimated silver ounces contained in the heap inventory is
due to changes in estimated silver recoveries anticipated for the remainder of the residual leach
phase. There were no changes in recoveries related to gold contained in the heap. Consequently,
the Company believes its current residual heap leach activities are expected to continue through
2014. However, the ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease, which is
currently estimated for 2014.
If our estimate of ultimate recovery requires adjustment, the impact upon our inventory
valuation and upon our income statement would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive/Negative |
|
Positive/Negative |
|
|
Change in Silver Recovery |
|
Change in Gold Recovery |
|
|
1% |
|
2% |
|
3% |
|
1% |
|
2% |
|
3% |
Quantity of recoverable
ounces |
|
1.7 million |
|
3.5 million |
|
5.2 million |
|
|
13,240 |
|
|
|
26,480 |
|
|
|
39,720 |
|
Positive impact on
future cost of
production per silver
equivalent ounce for
increases in recovery
rates |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
Negative impact on
future cost of
production per silver
equivalent ounce for
decreases in recovery
rates |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.89 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
Inventories of ore on leach pads are valued based upon actual production costs incurred to
produce and place such ore on the leach pad during the current period, adjusted for the effects on
monthly production of costs of abnormal production levels, less costs allocated to minerals
recovered through the leach process. The costs consist of those production activities occurring at
the mine site and include the costs, including depreciation, associated with mining, crushing and
precipitation circuits. In addition, refining is provided by a third party refiner to place the
metal extracted from the leach pad in a saleable form. These additional costs are considered in
the valuation of inventory.
Reclamation and remediation costs. Reclamation and remediation costs are based principally on
legal and regulatory requirements. Management estimates costs associated with reclamation of
mining properties as well as remediation cost for inactive properties. Such costs related to
active mines are accrued and charged over the expected operating lives of the mines using the
units-of-production method.
48
The estimated undiscounted cash flows generated by our assets and the estimated liabilities
for reclamation and remediation are determined using the Companys assumptions about future costs,
mineral prices, mineral processing recovery rates, production levels and capital and reclamation
costs. Such assumptions are based on the Companys current mining plan and the best available
information for making such estimates. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and
assumptions; however, actual amounts could differ from those based on such estimates and
assumptions.
Income taxes. In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, (FIN 48) an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax
position, if that tax position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the
technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification
of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The provisions of FIN 48
were effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax
of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all U.S.
federal income tax matters for years through 1999. Federal income tax returns for 2000 through
2007 are subject to examination. The Companys continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or
penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenues
Sales of metal from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2008 decreased by $13.1
million, or 24.8%, from the third quarter of 2007 to $39.8 million. The decrease in sales of metal
is attributable to decreased ounces of silver and gold sold partially offset by increased metal
prices realized during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. In the
third quarter of 2008, the Company sold 2.6 million ounces of silver and 11,215 ounces of gold
compared to 3.0 million ounces of silver and 22,249 ounces of gold for the same period in 2007.
Realized silver and gold prices were $14.47 and $886 per ounce, respectively, in the third quarter
of 2008 compared to $12.87 and $702, respectively, in the comparable quarter of 2007.
Included in revenues is the by-product metal sales consisting primarily of gold. In the third
quarter of 2008, by-product revenues totaled $8.8 million compared to $14.9 million for the same
period of 2007. The decrease in by-product revenues is primarily due to a decline in gold ounces
sold partially offset by an increase in the realized prices for gold. The Company believes, based
on the best estimates, that presentation of these revenue streams as by-products will continue to
be appropriate in the future.
49
In the third quarter of 2008, the Companys operations produced a total of 3.1 million ounces
of silver and 8,983 ounces of gold, compared to 2.7 million ounces of silver and 20,488 ounces of
gold in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in silver production is primarily due to increased
silver production at the Martha, Endeavor and San Bartolomé mines, offset by lower silver
production from the Rochester, Cerro Bayo and Broken Hill Mines.
Costs and Expenses
Production costs applicable to sales from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2008
decreased by $7.5 million, or 19.7%, from the third quarter of 2007 to $30.7 million. The decrease
in the third quarter of 2008 is primarily due to lower production costs incurred at the Rochester and
Cerro Bayo mines primarily due to the change in estimated silver ounces contained in the heap
inventory at the Rochester mine and lower tons mined at Cerro Bayo, partially offset by higher
costs of labor, fuel, power and other consumables at the Companys mining operations.
Depreciation and depletion increased by $2.7 million, or 70.0%, in the third quarter of 2008
compared to the prior years third quarter, primarily due to the increased depreciation and
depletion expense from the San Bartolomé mine which was placed into service at the end of the
second quarter of 2008.
Administrative and general expenses decreased by $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007.
Exploration expenses increased by $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007 as a result of increased exploration activity primarily due to the addition of
the Palmarejo Project.
A total of $0.8 million of pre-development costs at the Palmarejo project were recorded as
expenses during the third quarter of 2008. The Company completed its final feasibility study for
the Palmarejo project on June 10, 2008 and commenced capitalizing its mine development expenses
for the remainder of 2008. No pre-development expenses were recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest and other income in the third quarter of 2008 decreased by $1.1 million to $2.3
million compared with the third quarter of 2007. The decrease was primarily due to lower levels of
invested cash and short-term investments and lower interest rates earned on the Companys cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the prior
years comparable quarter.
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest, was $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2008
compared to $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in interest expense is related
to an increase in short term borrowings and capital lease obligations. Capitalized interest was
$2.4 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to $0.6 million in the prior years third
quarter.
50
Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company reported an income tax benefit of
approximately $3.8 million compared to an income tax provision of $2.5 million in the third quarter
of 2007. The following table summarizes the components of the Companys income tax provision for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Alternative minimum tax |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Foreign withholding |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Argentina |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
Australia |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bolivia |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Australia |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
Bolivia |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
$ |
3,836 |
|
|
$ |
(2,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized a current provision
in certain foreign jurisdictions primarily related to higher metal prices. Further, the Company
accrued foreign withholding taxes of approximately $0.5 million on inter-company transactions
between the U.S. parent and subsidiaries operating in Mexico, Argentina and Australia. The Company
recognized a $5.0 million deferred tax benefit for the recognition of deferred taxes on deductible
temporary differences and net operating loss carryforwards in the various jurisdictions. Finally,
the Company recognized a $1.1 million deferred tax provision in Bolivia for inflationary
adjustments on non-monetary assets and unrealized foreign exchange gains on U.S. dollar denominated
liabilities in Bolivia.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, due to higher metals prices, the Company
recognized a current provision in the U.S. and certain foreign operating jurisdictions. Further,
the Company accrued foreign withholding taxes of approximately $0.1 million on inter-company
transactions from the U.S. parent to the Argentina and Australia subsidiaries. Finally, the
Company recognized a $0.5 million deferred tax benefit in foreign jurisdictions from the benefit of
net operating losses in Chile for tax purposes and the recognition of the benefit of taxable
temporary differences in Argentina and Australia.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenues
Sales of metal from continuing operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
decreased by $8.3 million, or 5.4%, over the same period of 2007 to $147.1 million. The decrease
in product sales of metal is attributable to a decrease in silver and gold ounces sold partially
offset by an increase in the realized prices for both silver and gold. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, the Company sold 7.2 million ounces of silver and 41,145 ounces of gold
compared to 8.5 million ounces of silver and 72,401 ounces of gold for the same period in 2007.
Realized silver and gold prices were $17.17 and $952 per ounce, respectively, in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $13.34 and $669 in the comparable period of 2007.
Included in revenues is the by-product metal sales consisting primarily of gold. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, by-product revenues totaled $35.2 million compared to $47.1
million for the same period of 2007. The decrease in by-product revenues is primarily due to a
decline in gold ounces, partially offset by an increase in the realized prices for gold. The
Company believes, based on its best estimates, that presentation of these revenue streams as
by-products will continue to be appropriate in the future.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Companys continuing operations produced a
total of 8.0 million ounces of silver and 39,087 ounces of gold, compared to 8.3 million ounces of
silver and 70,492 ounces of gold in the same period of 2007. The decrease in silver production is
primarily due to decreased production from the Rochester, Cerro Bayo and Broken Hill mines.
51
Costs and Expenses
Production costs applicable to sales from continuing operations in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 decreased by $5.1 million, or 6.0%, from the same period of 2007 to $80.9
million. The decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily due to lower
production costs at the Rochester and Cerro Bayo mines primarily due to the change in estimated
silver ounces contained in the heap inventory at the Rochester mine and lower tons mined at Cerro Bayo, partially offset by
higher costs of labor, fuel, power and other consumables at the Companys mining operations.
Depreciation and depletion increased by $1.9 million, or 11.5%, for the first nine months of
2008 compared to the first nine months of 2007 primarily due to higher depreciation and depletion
expense from the San Bartolomé mine which was placed into service at the end of the second quarter
of 2008.
Administrative and general expenses increased by $3.6 million, or 21.5%, in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to compensation costs
associated with the Companys annual incentive plans, other Corporate expenses and non-operating
production activities while upgrading the electrical infrastructure at the Cerro Bayo mine which
was completed in May 2008.
Exploration expenses increased by $5.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 as a result of increased exploration activity related to the
addition of the Palmarejo project.
A total of $17.2 million of pre-development costs at the Palmarejo project were recorded as
expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company completed its final
feasibility study for the Palmarejo project on June 10, 2008 and commenced capitalizing its mine
development expenses for the remainder of 2008. No pre-development expenses were recorded during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
During the first quarter of 2007 the Company accrued the remaining $0.5 million royalty to
the U.S. Government called for under the May, 2001 settlement agreement relating to the federal
natural resources action commenced against the Company in March, 1996. The final payment was made
early in the second quarter of 2007.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest and other income in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $8.5
million to $3.8 million compared with the same period of 2007. The decrease was primarily due to
lower levels of invested cash and short-term investments and lower interest rates earned during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Interest expense was $2.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$0.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 due to increased short-term borrowings
and capital lease obligations at the Palmarejo project. Capitalized interest was $6.3 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.7 million in the same period of 2007.
52
Income Taxes
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company reported an income tax provision of
approximately $1.4 million compared to an income tax provision of $9.4 million in the same period
of 2007. The following table summarizes the components of the Companys income tax provision for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Alternative minimum tax |
|
$ |
(566 |
) |
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
United States Foreign withholding |
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
(797 |
) |
Argentina |
|
|
(2,496 |
) |
|
|
(4,472 |
) |
Australia |
|
|
(5,339 |
) |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bolivia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Australia |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
Bolivia |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Mexico |
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
(1,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, due to higher metals prices, the Company
recognized a current provision in the U.S. and certain foreign operating jurisdictions. Further,
the Company accrued foreign withholding taxes of approximately $0.9 million on inter-company
transactions from the U.S. parent to the Mexico, Argentina and Australia subsidiaries. The Company
recognized a $2.2 million deferred tax provision in Bolivia and Chile related to higher metal
prices and inflationary adjustments on non-monetary assets and unrealized foreign exchange gains on
U.S. dollar denominated liabilities in Bolivia. Finally, the Company recognized a deferred tax
benefit of $10.2 million related to the recognition of deferred taxes and deductable temporary
differences in net operating loss carryforwards in various jurisdictions.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, due to higher metals prices, the Company
recognized a current provision in the U.S. and certain foreign operating jurisdictions. Further,
the Company accrued foreign withholding taxes of approximately $0.8 million on inter-company
transactions from the U.S. parent to the Argentina and Australia subsidiaries. Finally, the
Company recognized a $0.8 million deferred tax provision in foreign jurisdictions from the
recognition of the benefit of tax loss carryforwards in Chile and the recognition of the benefit of
taxable temporary differences in Argentina and Australia. During the nine months ended September
30, 2007, the Company recorded $0.5 million in tax provision resulting from its assessment of prior
period tax contingencies across its various tax jurisdictions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Working Capital; Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Companys working capital at September 30, 2008, decreased by $40.6 million to
approximately $111.8 million compared to $152.4 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in
working capital was primarily attributed to capital spending related to the Palmarejo, Kensington
and San Bartolomé projects. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.2 to 1 at
September 30, 2008, compared to 2.4 to 1 at December 31, 2007.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the third quarter of 2008 was $1.2 million
compared to net cash used in operating activities of $5.5 million in the third quarter of 2007.
The increase of $6.7 million in cash flow from operations is primarily due to changes in
receivables and inventories related to proceeds from metal sales. Net cash used in investing
activities in the third quarter of 2008 was $21.8 million compared to $59.7 million in the prior
years comparable period. The decrease of $38.0 million in cash used in investing activities is
primarily due to an increase in proceeds from sales of short-term investments offset by an
increase in capital expenditures related to construction activities at the Palmarejo, Kensington
and San Bartolomé projects. Net cash used in financing activities was $21.6 million in the third
quarter of 2008, compared to $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2007. As a result of the above,
cash and cash equivalents decreased by $42.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to
$65.7 million for the comparable period in 2007.
53
Net cash used in operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $9.0
million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $28.7 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. The decrease of $37.7 million in cash flow from operations is primarily
due to a lower net income and changes in receivables related to accrued metal sales and increases in recoverable
value added taxes in Bolivia in connection with San Bartolomé construction activities. Net cash
used in investing activities in the first nine months of 2008 was $226.3 million compared to net
cash used in investing activities of $127.3 million in the prior years comparable period. The
increase of $99.0 million in cash used in investing activities is due to an increase of $99.3
million of capital expenditures related to construction activities at the Palmarejo, Kensington
and San Bartolomé projects. Net cash provided by financing activities was $192.4 million in the
first nine months of 2008, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $1.5 million in
the first nine months of 2007. The increase was due to cash proceeds from the issuance on March
18, 2008 of the Companys 3 1/4 % Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 in the aggregate amount of $230
million. As a result of the above, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $43.0 million in the
first nine months of 2008 compared to a decrease of $100.2 million for the comparable period in 2007.
Capital Expenditures
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company expended $87.7 million in capital expenditures
consisting of $29.6 million at San Bartolomé, $42.3 million at Palmarejo, $12.8 million at
Kensington, $0.2 million at the Martha mine, $2.6 million at the Cerro Bayo mine.
During the nine months ended September, 30, 2008, the Company expended $256.4 million in
capital expenditures consisting of $97.1 million at San
Bartolomé, $88.9 million at Palmarejo,
$32.3 million at Kensington, $3.9 million at the Martha Mine, $6.8 million at the Cerro Bayo Mine,
$26.5 million at Endeavor and $0.9 million at corporate and other.
Debt and Capital Resources
$50 Million Senior Secured Floating Rate Convertible Notes
On
October 20, 2008, the Company announced that it sold $50 million in aggregate principal
amount of senior secured floating rate convertible notes under an effective shelf registration
statement on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has granted the
purchaser a warrant to purchase up to an additional $25 million aggregate principal amount of
notes. The notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 7.50% per year, provided that in no event will the
annual rate be less than 9.00% or more than 12.00%. Interest is payable, at the Companys option,
in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock. The notes are the Companys
senior secured obligations, ranking equally with all existing and future senior obligations and
ranking senior to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and are secured by certain
assets of the Companys Coeur Rochester, Inc. subsidiary. The notes are convertible into shares of
the Companys common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to the close of business
on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The initial conversion price is
approximately $1.15 per share. The conversion price is subject to standard anti-dilution
protections. The Company intends to use the proceeds of this offering to fund continued
development at the Palmarejo silver/gold project in Mexico. Any additional remaining proceeds may
be used for general corporate purposes.
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2028
On March 18, 2008, the Company issued $230 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior
Convertible Notes due 2028 issued under an effective shelf registration statement on file with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
54
The notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 3 1/4% per year, payable on March 15
and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2008. The notes will mature on March 15,
2028, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased by the Company.
Each holder of the notes may require that the Company repurchase some or all of the holders
notes on March 15, 2013, March 15, 2015, March 15, 2018 and March 15, 2023 at a repurchase price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at
the Companys election. Holders will also have the right, following certain fundamental change
transactions, to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of their notes for cash at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued
and unpaid interest. The Company may redeem the notes for cash in whole or in part at any time on
or after March 22, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued
and unpaid interest.
The notes provide for net share settlement of any conversions, which limits the number of
shares of common stock to be issued in the future. Pursuant to this feature, upon conversion of the
notes, the Company (1) will pay the note holder an amount in cash equal to the lesser of the
conversion obligation or the principal amount of the notes, and (2) will settle any excess of the
conversion obligation above the notes principal amount in the Companys common stock, cash or a
combination thereof, at the Companys election.
The notes will be convertible under certain circumstances, at the holders option, at an
initial conversion rate of 176.0254 shares of the Companys common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $5.68 per
share of common stock (representing a 30% conversion premium based on the closing price of $4.37
per share of the Companys common stock on March 12, 2008), subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances.
The Company used the proceeds of this offering to complete the construction of the San
Bartolomé silver project in Bolivia, fund construction of the Palmarejo silver/gold project in
Mexico, repay borrowings under the Companys bridge loan facility and bank facility and for general
corporate purposes.
Acquisitions of Bolnisi and Palmarejo
On December 21, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of all the shares of Bolnisi Gold
NL and Palmarejo Gold and Silver Corporation in exchange for a total of approximately 272 million
shares of Coeur common stock, a total cash payment of approximately $1.1 million and the assumption
of liabilities of $0.7 billion. Coeur issued 0.682 shares of Coeur common stock (or, at the
election of the Bolnisi shareholder, CHESS Depositary Interests representing Coeur shares) and
A$0.004 in cash (or approximately US$1.0 million in the aggregate) for each Bolnisi ordinary share,
and 2.715 shares of Coeur common stock and C$0.004 in cash (or approximately US $0.1 million in the
aggregate) for each Palmarejo common share. The total consideration paid amounted to $1.1 billion
and the total liabilities assumed were $0.7 billion.
Bridging Debt Facility
On October 22, 2007, Bolnisi entered into a $20 million credit facility with Macquarie Bank
Limited to fund further exploration and development of the Palmarejo silver/gold project, the
exploration and development of the Yecora gold/silver project and the El Realito gold/silver
project and for working capital purposes. The credit facility was extended to September 30, 2008,
and had an interest rate at a variable rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 2.45%. The Company paid off
the outstanding balance under the facility on September 30, 2008.
55
Bank Loan
On August 30, 2007 Palmarejo entered into a temporary credit facility of $2.0 million secured
by the Companys investments in Asset-Backed Commercial Paper, to fund working capital
requirements. The facility was amended on October 9, 2007. On June 3, 2008, the Company paid off
the outstanding credit facility balance.
Cost Reduction Plan
In
October, 2008 Coeur implemented a cost reduction plan designed to
reduce non-operating costs by
approximately $10 million, or 40%, annually. The results of these efforts will be seen beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2008. An early example of this program is the 60% reduction in expenses at the Kensington
gold project in Alaska as the Company awaits a decision by the Supreme Court in the first half of
2009 on the previously permitted tailings facility. The workforce was reduced by half and several
consulting and third party services were eliminated. Additionally, the Companys Santiago office
staff has been reduced by 60% and its La Paz office was reduced by 25%.
Litigation and Other Events
Federal Court of (Alaska) Kensington Project Permit Challenge
Reference is made to the discussion set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Development Projects Kensington (Alaska)
for a detailed description of the Kensington project permit legal challenge.
No assurance can be given as to whether or when regulatory permits and approvals granted to
the Company may be further challenged, appealed or contested by third parties or issuing agencies,
or as to whether the Company will ultimately place the Kensington project into commercial
production.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risks as a part of its operations. In an effort to
mitigate losses associated with these risks, the Company may, at times, enter into derivative
financial instruments. These may take the form of forward sales contracts, foreign currency
exchange contracts and interest rate swaps. The Company does not actively engage in the practice of
trading derivative securities for profit. This discussion of the Companys market risk assessments
contains forward looking statements that contain risks and uncertainties. Actual results and
actions could differ materially from those discussed below.
The Companys operating results are substantially dependent upon the world market prices of
silver and gold. The Company has no control over silver and gold prices, which can fluctuate widely
and are affected by numerous factors, such as supply and demand and investor sentiment. In order to
mitigate some of the risk associated with these fluctuations, the Company will at times, enter into
forward sale contracts. The Company continually evaluates the potential benefits of engaging in
these strategies based on current market conditions. The Company may be exposed to nonperformance
by counterparties as a result of its hedging activities. This exposure would be limited to the
amount that the market price of the metal falls short of the contract price. The Company has
historically sold silver and gold produced by our mines pursuant to forward contracts and at spot
prices prevailing at the time of sale. Since 1999, the Company has not engaged in any silver
hedging activities and is currently not engaged in any gold hedging activities.
56
The Company enters into concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters. The contracts,
in general, provide for a provisional payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices
and the provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated
from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale
of concentrates at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which is the
final settlement price based on a future price, does not qualify for hedge accounting. These
embedded derivatives are recorded as derivative assets (in Prepaid expenses and other), or
derivative liabilities (in Accrued liabilities and other), on the balance sheet and are adjusted to fair value through earnings each period until
the date of final settlement.
At September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of $58.9
million, consisting of 2.5 million ounces of silver and 19,710 ounces of gold. For each one cent
per ounce change in realized silver price, revenue would vary (plus or minus) approximately
$25,000; and for each one dollar per ounce change in realized gold price, revenue would vary (plus
or minus) approximately $19,700.
The Company operates in several foreign countries, specifically Bolivia, Chile, Argentina and
Mexico, which exposes it to risks associated with fluctuations in the exchange rates of the
currencies involved. As part of its program to manage foreign currency risk, from time to time, the
Company enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts. These contracts enable the Company
to purchase a fixed amount of foreign currencies. Gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts
that are related to firm commitments are designated and effective as hedges and are deferred and
recognized in the same period as the related transaction. All other contracts that do not qualify
as hedges are marked to market and the resulting gains or losses are recorded in income. The
Company continually evaluates the potential benefits of entering into these contracts to mitigate
foreign currency risk and proceeds when it believes that the exchange rates are most beneficial.
The Company entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce the foreign exchange
risk associated with forecasted Chilean peso operating costs for 2008 at its Cerro Bayo mine. The
contracts require the Company to exchange U.S. dollars for Chilean pesos at a weighted average
exchange rate of 493 pesos to each U.S. dollar. At September 30, 2008, the Company had foreign
exchange contracts of $3.0 million in U.S. dollars. For the three months ended September 30, 2008
and September 30, 2007, the Company recorded a realized gain (loss) of approximately $(0.1) million
and $0.1 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded a realized gain
of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, in connection with its foreign currency hedging
program. As of September 30, 2008, the fair value of the foreign exchange contracts was a
liability of $0.2 million.
All of the Companys long-term debt at September 30, 2008, is fixed-rate based. The fair value
of the Companys long-term debt at September 30, 2008 was $124.2 million and $135.7 million related
to its 1 1/4% and 3 1/4% Senior Convertible Notes, respectively. The fair value was estimated based
upon bond market closing prices on or about September 30, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed by it in its periodic reports filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Commissions rules and forms. Based on an evaluation of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures conducted by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, such officers concluded at September 30, 2008, that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at a reasonable level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Based on an evaluation by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
such officers concluded that there was no change in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ending September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
57
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Federal Court of (Alaska) Kensington Project Permit Challenge
Reference is made to the discussion set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Development Projects Kensington (Alaska)
for a detailed description of the Kensington project permit legal challenge.
No assurance can be given as to whether or when regulatory permits and approvals granted to
the Company may be further challenged, appealed or contested by third parties or issuing agencies,
or as to whether the Company will ultimately place the Kensington project into commercial
production.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A (Risk Factors) of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 sets forth information relating to important risks and uncertainties that could
materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition or operating results.
Those risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of the Companys business, financial
condition and operating results. Certain of those risk factors have been updated in this Form 10-Q
to provide updated information, as set forth below. References to we, our and us in these
risk factors refer to the Company.
The market prices of silver and gold are volatile. If we experience low silver and gold prices
it may result in decreased revenues and decreased net income or losses, and may negatively affect
our business.
Silver and gold are commodities. Their prices fluctuate, and are affected by many factors
beyond our control, including interest rates, expectations regarding inflation, speculation,
currency values, governmental decisions regarding the disposal of precious metals stockpiles,
global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors.
Because we currently derive approximately 76% of our revenues from continuing operations from sales
of silver, our earnings are primarily related to the price of this metal.
The market prices of silver (Handy & Harman) and gold (London Final) on October 28, 2008 were
$8.81 and $730.50 per ounce, respectively. The prices of silver and gold may decline in the future.
Factors that are generally understood to contribute to a decline in the price of silver include
sales by private and government holders, and a general global economic slowdown.
Coeur may also suffer from declines in mineral prices. Since 1999, Coeur has not engaged in
any silver hedging activities and is currently not engaged in any gold hedging activities.
Accordingly, Coeur has no protection from declines in mineral prices or currency fluctuations.
If the prices of silver and gold are depressed for a sustained period and our net losses
resume, we may be forced to suspend mining at one or more of our properties until the prices
increase, and to record additional asset impairment write-downs. Any lost revenues, continued or
increased net losses or additional asset impairment write-downs would adversely affect our results
of operations.
58
We may have to record write-downs, which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144) established accounting standards for impairment of the value of
long-lived assets such as mining properties. SFAS 144 requires a company to review the
recoverability of the cost of its assets by estimating the future undiscounted cash flows expected
to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment, measured by comparing an
assets carrying value to its fair value, must be recognized when the carrying value of the asset
exceeds these cash flows, and recognizing impairment write-
downs could negatively impact our results of operations.
If silver or gold prices decline or we fail to control production costs or realize the minable
ore reserves at our mining properties, we may be required to recognize asset write-downs. We also
may record other types of additional mining property charges in the future to the extent a property
is sold by us for a price less than the carrying value of the property, or if reclamation
liabilities have to be increased in connection with the closure and reclamation of a property.
Additional write-downs of mining properties could negatively impact our results of operations.
The Kensington property has been the subject of litigation involving a permit required to
complete construction of a required tailings facility. Reference is made to the discussion set
forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
under Development Projects Kensington (Alaska) for a detailed description of the Kensington
project permit legal challenge, including the possibility of an impairment writedown in the event
that the expectation of the long-term price for gold decreases below approximately $667 per ounce.
No assurance can be given as to whether or when regulatory permits and approvals granted to
the Company may be further challenged, appealed or contested by third parties or issuing agencies,
or as to whether the Company will ultimately place the Kensington project into commercial
production.
On October 31, 2008, the Company announced a temporary suspension of operating activities at the Cerro Bayo mine due primarily to lower metal prices and continuing higher operating costs. The Company will temporarily suspend mining operations and undertake efforts to further develop its mine plan and its ore reserve in an effort to also further extend the mine life.
The Company determined that the decline in the price of silver, reduced production levels and the increase in operating cost levels was a triggering event in accordance with FAS 144 requiring the Company to assess whether the long-lived assets at the mine were impaired. Step one of the impairment assessment compares the cumulative undiscounted prospective cash flows of the mine to the sum of the carrying values of the long-lived assets at Cerro Bayo. Should the carrying values of the long-lived assets at the mine exceed the sum of those undiscounted future cash flows, a comparison of the fair value of the asset to its book value is then required. If the fair value is less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss would be recorded.
In projecting its future cash flows, the Company considers certain assumptions for silver prices (including current and historical prices, analyst consensus forward prices, as well as the trailing three-year average silver market prices) and production levels, expected and historical operating costs and required capital expenditures based on available life of mine plans. Assumptions underlying future cash flows are subject to significant risk and uncertainty associated with any differences between specific assumptions and market conditions, such as silver and gold prices, lower than expected recoverable ounces and/or the Companys operating performance. Based on the Companys assessment, there was not a required impairment at September 30, 2008. Should silver prices continue below the consensus forward or historical prices, should the cash costs per ounce exceed those projected and historically achieved, or should an updated reserve report result in a reduction of the number of ounces recoverable at Cerro Bayo, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss and that loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations and financial position. The Company will be updating its reserve reports as of December 31, 2008.
The estimation of ore reserves is imprecise and depends upon subjective factors. Estimated ore
reserves may not be realized in actual production. Our operating results may be negatively affected
by inaccurate estimates.
The ore reserve figures presented in our public filings are estimates made by our technical
personnel. Reserve estimates are a function of geological and engineering analyses that require us
to make assumptions about production costs and silver and gold market prices. Reserve estimation is
an imprecise and subjective process and the accuracy of such estimates is a function of the quality
of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation, judgment and experience.
Assumptions about silver and gold market prices are subject to great uncertainty as those prices
have fluctuated widely in the past. Declines in the market prices of silver or gold may render
reserves containing relatively lower grades of ore uneconomic to exploit, and we may be required to
reduce reserve estimates, discontinue development or mining at one or more of our properties, or
write down assets as impaired. Should we encounter mineralization or geologic formations at any of
our mines or projects different from those we predicted, we may adjust our reserve estimates and
alter our mining plans. Either of these alternatives may adversely affect our actual production and
operating results.
59
We based our ore reserve determinations as of December 31, 2007 on a long-term silver price
average of $11 per ounce, with the exception of the Endeavor mine which uses $15 per ounce and the
Broken
Hill mine which uses $13.50 per ounce of silver, and a long-term gold price average of $600
per ounce for all properties with the exception of the Kensington property which used a gold price
of $550 per ounce. The market prices of silver (Handy & Harman) and gold (London Final) on
September 30, 2008 were $12.37 and $884.50 per ounce (per kitco), respectively.
The estimation of the ultimate recovery of metals contained within the Rochester heap leach
pad inventory is inherently inaccurate and subjective and requires the use of estimation
techniques. Actual recoveries can be expected to vary from estimations.
The Rochester mine utilizes the heap leach process to extract silver and gold from ore. The
heap leach process is a process of extracting silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad
and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold,
which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.
The key stages in the conversion of ore into silver and gold are (i) the blasting process in
which the ore is broken into large pieces; (ii) the processing of the ore through a crushing
facility that breaks it into smaller pieces; (iii) the transportation of the crushed ore to the
leach pad where the leaching solution is applied; (iv) the collection of the leach solution; (v)
subjecting the leach solution to the precipitation process, in which gold and silver is converted
back to a fine solid; (vi) the conversion of the precipitate into doré; and (vii) the conversion by
a third party refinery of the doré into refined silver and gold bullion.
We use several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on
the leach pads during the key stages. As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting
process, samples of the drill residue are assayed to determine estimated quantities of contained
metal. We estimate the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning satellite survey techniques.
We then process the ore through a crushing facility where the output is again weighed and sampled
for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is
completed with appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. We then transport the crushed
ore to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected
from the leach pads, we continuously sample for assaying. We measure the quantity of leach solution
with flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the
product is converted to doré, which is the final product produced by the mine. We again weigh,
sample and assay the doré. Finally, a third party smelter converts the doré and determines final
ounces of silver and gold available for sale. We then review this end result and reconcile it to
the estimates we developed and used throughout the production process. Based on this review, we
adjust our estimation procedures when appropriate.
Our reported inventories include metals estimated to be contained in the ore on leach pad of
$32.3 million as of September 30, 2008. Of this amount, $9.3 million was reported as a current
asset and $22.9 million was reported as a noncurrent asset. The distinction between current and
noncurrent is based upon the expected length of time necessary for the leaching process to remove
the metals from the crushed ore. The historical cost of the metal that is expected to be extracted
within twelve months is classified as current and the historical cost of metals contained within
the crushed ore that will be extracted beyond twelve months is classified as noncurrent. The ore on
leach pad inventory is stated at actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the
leach pad during the current period, adjusted for the effects on monthly production costs of
abnormal production levels.
60
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time, and the quantity of metal that
may be extracted relative to such twelve month period, requires the use of estimates which are
inherently inaccurate since they rely upon laboratory test work. Test work consists of 60 day leach
columns from which we project metal recoveries into the future. The quantities of metal contained
in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process
extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory column tests and actual
experience occurring over approximately nineteen years of leach pad operation at the Rochester
mine. The assumptions we use to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion
process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. We periodically
review our estimates compared to actual experience and revise our estimates when appropriate. The
length of time necessary to achieve our currently estimated ultimate recoveries of between 59% and
61.5% for silver, depending on the area being leached, and 93% for gold is estimated to be
between 5 and 10 years. In August 2007, the Company terminated mining and crushing operations as
ore reserves were fully mined. Residual heap leach activities are expected to continue through
2014.
When we began operations at the Rochester mine in 1986, based solely on laboratory testing, we
estimated the ultimate recovery of silver and gold at 50% and 80%, respectively. Since 1986, we
have adjusted the expected ultimate recovery 3 times (once in each of 1989, 1997 and 2003) based
upon actual experience gained from leach operations. In 1989, we increased our estimated
recoveries for silver and gold to 55% and 85%, respectively. The change was accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate, which had the effect of increasing the estimated recoverable
ounces of silver and gold contained in the heap by 1.6 million ounces and 10,000 ounces,
respectively. In 1997, we revised our estimated recoveries for silver and gold to 59% and 89%,
respectively, which increased the estimated recoverable ounces of silver and gold contained in the
heap by 4.7 million ounces and 39,000 ounces, respectively. In 2003, we revised our estimated
recoveries for silver and gold to 61.5% and 93%, respectively, which increased the estimated
recoverable ounces of silver and gold contained in the heap by 1.8 million ounces and 41,000
ounces, respectively. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company increased its estimated silver
ounces contained in the heap inventory by 5.4 million ounces. The increase in estimated silver
ounces contained in the heap inventory is due to changes in silver recoveries anticipated for the
remainder of the residual leach phase. There were no changes in recoveries related to gold
contained in the heap. Consequently, the Company believes its current residual heap leach
activities are expected to continue through 2014. However, the ultimate recovery will not be known
until leaching operations cease, which is currently estimated for 2014.
If our estimate of ultimate recovery requires adjustment, the impact upon our inventory
valuation and upon our income statement would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive/Negative |
|
Positive/Negative |
|
|
Change in Silver Recovery |
|
Change in Gold Recovery |
|
|
1% |
|
2% |
|
3% |
|
1% |
|
2% |
|
3% |
Quantity of recoverable
ounces |
|
1.7 million |
|
3.5 million |
|
5.2 million |
|
|
13,240 |
|
|
|
26,480 |
|
|
|
39,720 |
|
Positive impact on
future cost of
production per silver
equivalent ounce for
increases in recovery
rates |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
Negative impact on
future cost of
production per silver
equivalent ounce for
decreases in recovery
rates |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.89 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
61
Inventories of ore on leach pads are valued based upon actual production costs incurred to
produce and place such ore on the leach pad during the current period, adjusted for the effects on
monthly production costs of abnormal production levels, less costs allocated to minerals recovered
through the leach process. The costs consist of those production activities occurring at the mine
site and include the costs, including depreciation, associated with mining, crushing and
precipitation circuits. In addition, refining is provided by a third party refiner to place the
metal extracted from the leach pad in a saleable form. These additional costs are considered in the
valuation of inventory. Negative changes in our inventory valuations and correspondingly on our
income statement would have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position and
cash
flows.
Our revenues and income (or loss) from our interest in the Endeavor and Broken Hill mines are
dependent in part upon the performance of the operators of the mines.
In May and September 2005, we acquired silver production and reserves at the Endeavor and
Broken Hill mines in Australia, respectively. These are primarily zinc and lead mines that are
owned and operated by other mining companies. The Companys revenues and income (or loss) from its
interest in the silver production at these mines are dependent upon the performance of those
operators and mines as well as upon zinc and lead prices that are sufficient to maintain
sustainable operations. The decline in primary metal prices may
result in cessation of mining operations and an impairment would
likely occur.
On August 21, 2008, the operator of the Broken Hill mine advised the market that, following an
extensive review of its Broken Hill operations, it had implemented a plan to resize the operation
in light of current low metal prices. Under the revised operating plan, ore production will
decrease from 1.8 to 0.95 million tonnes per year. This reduction in ore production could have an
adverse effect on Coeurs revenues and income at this mine.
Significant construction and other risks are associated with our development projects that could
result in delays and/or higher than anticipated costs in connection with the completion of
construction and commencement of mining operations there.
Our ability to estimate the time and costs associated with the completion of construction of
mining and processing facilities at our development properties, such as San Bartolomé, Kensington
and Palmarejo, is subject to the inherent uncertainties associated with construction, commissioning
and start-up activities of such facilities and commencement of operations.
Our business depends on good relations with our employees.
The Company could experience labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production
that could adversely affect us. As of September 30, 2008, unions represented approximately 35.5%
of our worldwide workforce. On that date, the Company had 183 employees at its Cerro Bayo mine and
144 employees at its Martha mine who were working under a collective bargaining agreement and 123
employees at its San Bartolomé mine. The agreement covering the Cerro Bayo mine expires on
December 21, 2010 and a collective bargaining agreement covering the Martha mine expires on June 1,
2010. The labor agreement related to the employees of the San
Bartolomé mine does not have a fixed term.
Our future operating performance may not generate cash flows sufficient to meet our debt payment
obligations.
As of September 30, 2008, we had a total of approximately $437.0 million outstanding indebtedness.
Our ability to make scheduled debt payments on our outstanding indebtedness will depend on our
future operating performance and cash flow. Our operating performance and cash flow, in part, are
subject to economic factors beyond our control, including the market prices of silver and gold. We
may not be able to generate enough cash flow to meet our obligations and commitments. If we cannot
generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt, we may need to further refinance
our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain the necessary funds. We cannot predict
whether we will be able to refinance our debt, issue equity or dispose of assets to raise funds on
a timely basis or on satisfactory terms.
We might be unable to raise additional financing necessary to conduct our business, make payments
when due or refinance our debt.
We might need to raise additional funds in order to implement our business plan, refinance our debt
or acquire complementary businesses or products. Any required additional financing might not be
available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing
equity securities, holders of our common stock could experience significant dilution of their
ownership interest, and these securities could have rights senior to those of the holders of our
common stock.
62
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and may decline.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and may decline in the future. The market
price of our common stock historically has fluctuated widely and been affected by our operating
results and by many factors beyond our control. These factors include: market prices of silver and
gold; general stock market conditions; interest rates; expectations regarding inflation; currency
values; and global and regional political and economic conditions and other factors.
Conversion of the Senior Secured Floating Rate Convertible Notes will dilute the ownership interest
of existing stockholders, including holders who had previously converted their Senior Secured
Floating Rate Convertible Notes.
To the extent we issue shares of our common stock upon conversion of the Senior Secured Floating
Rate Convertible Notes, the conversion of some or all of such notes will dilute the ownership
interests of existing stockholders, including holders who had previously converted their notes. Any
sales in the public market of shares of our common stock issuable upon such conversion could
adversely affect prevailing market prices of shares of our common stock. In addition, the existence
of the Senior Secured Floating Rate Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market
participants because the conversion of such notes could depress the price of shares of our common
stock.
We have the ability to issue additional equity securities, which would lead to dilution of our
issued and outstanding common stock and may materially and adversely affect the price of our common
stock.
The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities would
result in dilution of existing shareholders equity interests in us. We are authorized to issue,
without shareholder approval, 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series to
establish the number of shares to be included in each such series and to fix the designation,
powers, preferences and relative participating, optional, conversion and other special rights of
the shares of each such series and the qualification, limitations or restrictions thereof,
including but not limited to the fixing or alteration of the dividend rights, dividend rate or
rates, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, the redemption price or
prices and the liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of shares of preferred stock,
or any or all of them. Any such series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion
rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other
rights superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. Our board of directors has no present
intention of issuing any such preferred stock, but reserves the right to do so in the future and
has reserved for issuance a series of preferred stock in connection with our shareholder rights
plan. If we issue additional equity securities, the price of our common stock may be materially and
adversely affected.
We are subject to anti-takeover provisions in our charter, in our bylaws and in our shareholder
rights plan that could delay or prevent an acquisition of Coeur even if such an acquisition would
be beneficial to our shareholders.
The provisions of our articles of incorporation and our bylaws could delay or prevent a third party
from acquiring us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our shareholders. Some of these
provisions (i) authorize the issuance of preferred stock which can be created and issued by the
board of directors without prior shareholder approval, commonly referred to as blank check
preferred stock, with rights senior to those of common stock; (ii) authorize the board of
directors to increase or decrease the size of the board without shareholder approval; (iii)
authorize a majority of the directors then in office to fill any vacancy on the board of directors;
and (iv) require that a fair price be paid in some business transactions. We have also
implemented a shareholder rights plan which could delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us.
63
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibits. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York
Mellon, as trustee, dated October 20, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on October
22, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture and Security Agreement,
among the Registrant, Coeur Rochester, Inc., as grantor, and The Bank of New
York Mellon, as trustee, dated as of October 20, 2008 (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, as
filed on October 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Senior Secured Floating Rate Convertible Note due 2012, dated
October 20, 2008 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on October 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Senior Secured Floating Rate
Convertible Notes due 2012 of the Registrant, dated October 20, 2008
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K, as filed on October 22, 2008). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the CEO |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the CFO |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the CEO (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the CFO (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) |
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COEUR DALENE MINES CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated October 31, 2008 |
/s/ Dennis E. Wheeler
|
|
|
DENNIS E. WHEELER |
|
|
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated October 31, 2008 |
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs
|
|
|
MITCHELL J. KREBS |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated October 31, 2008 |
/s/ Tom T. Angelos
|
|
|
TOM T. ANGELOS |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
65