e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended May 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-12867
3COM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2605794 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
350 Campus Drive |
|
|
Marlborough, Massachusetts
|
|
01752 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(508) 323-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,723,402,811 based on the closing sale price as reported on
The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
405,288,012 shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Parts Into Which Incorporated |
|
|
|
Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held
September 24, 2008 (Proxy Statement)
|
|
Part III, to the extent stated herein |
3Com Corporation
Form 10-K Annual Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended May 30, 2008
Table of Contents
1
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31, with each fiscal quarter
ending on the Friday generally nearest August 31, November 30 and February 28. For presentation
purposes, the periods are shown as ending on August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31, as
applicable.
We acquired majority (51 percent) ownership of Huawei-3Com Co., Ltd. n/k/a H3C Technologies Co.,
Limited (H3C), a China-based networking equipment business, on January 27, 2006 and determined it
was then appropriate to consolidate H3Cs results. For convenience of close purposes we
consolidated the results of H3C as of February 1, 2006. H3C follows a calendar year basis of
reporting and therefore results are consolidated on a two-month time lag. In fiscal 2006, we
recorded equity income for the period April 1, 2005 through January 31, 2006 and consolidated H3Cs
results for the period February 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006.
We acquired the remaining 49 percent minority interest of H3C on March 29, 2007.
3Com, the 3Com logo, Digital Vaccine, IntelliJack, NBX, OfficeConnect, TippingPoint and
TippingPoint Technologies are registered trademarks and H3C and VCX are trademarks of 3Com
Corporation or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Other product and brand names may be
trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the following aspects of our business:
H3C strategy, growth, dependence, expected benefits, tax rate, sales from China, and resources
needed to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and manage operations; impact of recent accounting
regulations; expected annual amortization expense; environment for enterprise networking equipment;
challenges relating to sales growth; trends and goals for each of our segments and regions;
expectation of license fees totaling $70 million and other resolutions in connection with agreement
with Realtek; intent to pursue termination fee; supply of components; research and development
focus; future sales of connectivity products; execution of our go-to-market strategy; strategic
product and technology development plans; goal of profitability; dependence on China; ability to
satisfy cash requirements for at least the next twelve months; restructuring activities and
expected charges to be incurred; expected cost savings from restructuring activities and
integration; potential acquisitions and strategic relationships; future contractual obligations;
recovery of deferred tax assets; reserves; market risk; outsourcing; competition and pricing
pressures; expectation regarding base interest rates; impact of
foreign currency fluctuations; belief regarding meritorious defenses
to litigation claims and effect of litigation; and you can identify these and other forward-looking
statements by the use of words such as may, can, should, expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates, predicts, intends, continue, or the negative of such terms, or other
comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or
relating to any forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Part I Item 1A Risk Factors. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on our assessment of information
available to us at the time this report is filed. We do not intend, and disclaim any obligation,
to update any forward-looking statements.
In this Form 10-K we refer to the Peoples Republic of China as China or the PRC.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
We provide secure, converged networking solutions on a global scale to organizations of all sizes.
Our products and solutions enable customers to manage business-critical voice, video, data and
other advanced networking technologies in a secure, scalable, reliable and efficient network
environment. We deliver networking products and services for enterprises that view their networks
as mission critical, and value cost-effective superior performance. Our products form integrated
solutions and function in multi-vendor environments based upon open, not proprietary, platforms.
Our objective and strategy is to be one of the leading enterprise networking companies by
delivering innovative, secure, feature-rich networking products and solutions built on open
platform technology.
3Com was incorporated in California on June 4, 1979 and reincorporated in Delaware on June 12,
1997. Our corporate headquarters are located in Marlborough, Massachusetts. We have offices and
sales capabilities in 35 countries and 60 locations worldwide. Our Web site address is
www.3Com.com. We make available on our Web site, free of charge, our SEC filings (including our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Section 16
filings on Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendments to those reports) as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file with or furnish such material to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The information contained on our Web site is not incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Further, a copy of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K is located at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be
obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements
and other information regarding our filings at http://www.sec.gov.
MARKETS AND CUSTOMERS
We design and market our offerings to enterprises that vary in size from small business to large
multi-national entities. These organizations range across a number of vertical industries,
including education, finance, government, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing and real estate. We
offer our customers solutions for mission-critical network environments on an open platform design.
Our product designs recognize that enterprise networking customers face the following fundamental
challenges:
|
|
|
Performance Enterprise networks have increasing performance requirements with the
expansion of internet protocol, or IP, traffic driven by newer applications such as voice
and video over IP. |
|
|
|
|
Security The threat environment for todays enterprises is rapidly changing and
requires pervasive network solutions that help control access, quarantine malicious data,
and restore data. |
|
|
|
|
Application delivery Enterprise customers have evolving needs for increased
application solutions tied to their networks. Customers benefit from best-in-class
solutions for needs such as wide area network, or WAN optimization and voice solutions
integrated directly into their networking solutions. |
|
|
|
|
Cost effectiveness Enterprise customers value solutions which are affordable to
acquire and operate and offer long-term scalability. |
We believe that open platform technology offers our customers a more versatile environment for the
increasing use of applications over network infrastructures. We further believe it offers a more
cost-effective solution as it works in multi-vendor environments on a non-proprietary basis. Our
open platform technology is designed into our switch and router products to directly deliver
applications over networking capability. We believe that our customers benefit from the flexibility
to interface best-in-class applications with our products and we therefore actively develop
partnerships to deliver this value.
We focus on delivering superior networking solutions that offer a cost advantage to our customers
to own and operate. Our products provide superior value through features such as lower power
requirements, and inter-operability in multi-vendor networks. We believe that our global presence,
brand identity, strong development organization and intellectual property portfolio provide a solid
foundation for achieving our objectives.
Our products are sold on a worldwide basis through a combination of value added partners,
distributors and direct sales representatives. We also work with service providers to deliver
managed networking solutions for enterprise customers.
In support of the above vision we co-founded a Chinese joint-venture called H3C in 2003 to
penetrate the developing China market as well as to create a strong development and operational
base for building our networking solutions. In fiscal year
3
2007 we completed our acquisition of H3C. In fiscal 2008 we organized our operations into four
reporting segments: H3C, Data Voice Business Unit (DVBU), TippingPoint, and Corporate Expenses
(Corporate). Our H3C segment is our core for engineering and product development of a broad array
of networking products and solutions, and it sells into the China market. Our DVBU segment designs
and markets networking solutions targeted at customers in developed networking markets, and sells
H3Cs products and H3C-sourced networking gear on a worldwide basis. TippingPoint offers customers
purpose built appliance security solutions through intrusion prevention systems, or IPS, technology
and related virus protection services we call Digital Vaccine.
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
H3C SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
H3C develops global products that address the global market. H3C products can generally be
classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking LAN Switches, Routers, and Network Management Software; |
|
|
§ |
|
Emerging Technology IP Storage and IP Video Surveillance; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security Firewalls; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Services. |
Networking
In order to meet the business and technology needs of our customers, our networking infrastructure
products focus on the requirements for a secure, converged network: availability, performance,
scalability and ease-of-use. We focus on reducing complexity and cost of ownership by making
management and configuration of secure, converged voice and data networking much easier, and we
continue to innovate around a standards-based, open architecture that supports multi-vendor
environments.
LAN Switches
Switches are multi-port devices, located in the network core and at the network edge, that join
multiple computers and peripheral devices and serve as the foundation for transporting voice, video
and data over a network. We offer a number of fixed-configuration and modular chassis switches
that we believe provide the performance and flexibility required by our customers.
Our switching products represent a broad offering, including full-featured modular, stackable and
stand-alone switches ranging from 10 Megabits per second (Mbps) to near Terabit per second
performance. Our switches are available as managed units, which are typically found in enterprise
environments and unmanaged, standalone units, typically used by small and medium-sized
organizations. We design our enterprise-class switches to share a common operating system and user
interface that work together to lower the cost of ownership and management and enable customers to
easily upgrade their network solution as their business and network requirements grow. Our
switches also include robust network security features, and are built to support the convergence of
data, voice and video. H3Cs principal switch products are as follows:
|
§ |
|
Core Routing Switches. The S9500 Series 10G Multi-service Core
Routing Switch is a new generation high performance switch. The S9500
series is designed to fully satisfy the requirements of end-users
seeking its high capability, high reliability and multiple services.
It is extensively applied as the core layer of E-government networks,
campus networks, education networks and other enterprise networks and
core layer or aggregation layer of carriers IP Metro Area Networks
(MANs). |
|
|
§ |
|
Multi-Service Switches. The S7500 Series high-end multi-service
switch features high performance, high port density and high
flexibility. It can be applied to the core layer of enterprise
networks, campus networks and education MANs, to the convergence layer
of carriers IP MANs, and to the access layer of data centers. |
|
|
§ |
|
Layer 3 Gigabit Stackable Switches The 5500 series offers excellent
security, reliability and multi-service support capability, making it
an excellent choice for the convergence layer of large enterprise
networks or campus networks, the core layer of medium- and small-sized
enterprise |
4
|
|
|
networks, and the edge layer of MANs. |
|
|
§ |
|
Layer2 and Layer 3 Intelligent and Resilient Switches. The Layer 2
series offers wire-speed Gigabit Ethernet switching products that
provide high capacity with a full range of features. The Layer 3
series represents the next generation of desktop switches, which can
help customers implement a gigabit Ethernet core network or
aggregation layer with high availability as well as scalability. |
Routers
Our routers, in combination with our other networking infrastructure products, provide a means of
transporting converged voice and data traffic across an IP wide area network or WAN while
preserving the quality of service or QoS required for mission critical applications.
Our H3C segment offers a full portfolio of router products from carrier-class core routers to
modular routers to small business access routers designed to scale as these businesses grow. H3C
router products are classified as SR, MSR and AR Series Routers. All SR routers are IPv6 ready and
include carrier-class availability with redundancy in all key modules. MSR routers are oriented to
support multiple-service applications, delivering wire speed and concurrent services of data, voice
and video. The AR Series Routers are easy to manage, offer VPN functionality and support multiple
security products.
|
§ |
|
SR series Routers. The SR family consists of core routers ranging
from products that support a super-large capacity core router, which
can be applied in national backbone networks, provincial backbone
networks and other super-large networks (including those serving at
the backbone network edge and MAN core), to those working at the core
networks of industries and enterprises. |
|
|
§ |
|
Intelligent Multi-Service Enterprise Core Routers. The MSR Series
Routers support multiple services, integrating data, voice and video
in one device. MSR adopts an optimized hardware and software
structure to guarantee embedded security and significant performance
while providing the services such as voice over IP or VoIP, business
video and network analysis etc. |
|
|
§ |
|
Fixed Port Branch Routers. The AR Series Access Routers are
fixed-port products for small-sized enterprises and branch offices.
They feature enhanced security, superior reliability and advanced QoS
services. |
Network and Access Management System
H3C offers a comprehensive network management solution designed to offer clients an end-to-end
business management tool by providing a complete solution that integrates applications, resources
and users. The Intelligent Management Center is a suite of scalable tools for simplifying network
and access management on an open technology platform.
Emerging Technology
IP Storage
Our H3C segment is a leading developer of IP storage area network or IP SAN offerings in China. IP
SAN is a third generation of technology for storage, and is based on the most advanced architecture
and open, standard IP protocol. With the goal of storage virtualization and data management
standardization, H3C integrates industry leading data management technology and application service
technology on standard IP architecture, delivering a unified IP storage architecture.
IP Video Surveillance
IP video surveillance allows our customers to leverage existing network installations to cost
effectively deliver video security features. The features of our switches, routers and network
management such as power over Ethernet to power video devices and network management capabilities
controlling access, are leveraged with surveillance equipment to deliver effective video
surveillance solutions. Our H3C business unit sells integrated surveillance offerings to targeted
vertical customers focused on integrated security solutions.
5
Security
Firewalls
SecPath Firewalls are new-generation firewalls designed to provide a flexible, high-performance
security solution for large and medium-enterprise central sites and service providers.
Services
H3C service offerings cover key aspects of support that customers need to keep their data
networking solutions operating effectively, including telephone support, hardware replacement,
software updates, dedicated on-site engineers and spare parts. H3C also offers high-end
professional services and training to provide complete product plus service solutions for its
customers. The portfolio of professional services includes assessment and design, project
management, training and certifications, installation, and integration services that are especially
important to customers that purchase higher-end switches, routers and IP telephony communications
systems.
DATA AND VOICE BUSINESS UNIT (DVBU) SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Our DVBU segment provides scalable, feature-rich, high performance, reliable, and secure
standards-based networking solutions for customers on a global basis. Specifically, we believe our
products appeal to enterprises and public sector organizations migrating to secure IP-based
infrastructures that deliver converged voice and data applications. DVBU leverages our
high-quality H3C developed offerings complemented with feature-specific designs oriented at the
needs of customers globally. Our DVBU segment also supplements the H3C offerings with products
purpose-built for globally targeted customers. DVBU products and services can generally be
classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking; |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Telephony; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Services. |
Networking
Our DVBU segment markets H3C developed and manufactured networking equipment on a global scale. In
addition to the offerings described above in our H3C segment products, DVBU carries a
custom-developed product set of fixed configuration switches and routers designed to address the
specific needs of our targeted verticals. All of our infrastructure platforms are based on open
standards, which allows for interoperability as well as the ability to integrate emerging
technologies and applications. Products include:
|
§ |
|
Ethernet Switching. We offer a full range of fixed-configuration and
modular Ethernet switches that deliver performance and flexibility to
the edge and core IP networks. At the edge, DVBU offerings include
enterprise-class offerings such as the Switch 5500 family, Switch 4500
and Switch 4200 families of products, as well as our OfficeConnect®
and Baseline series targeted at small and medium businesses. At the
core, DVBU offers fully resilient, high-capacity and feature-rich
modular switching products. These include our high-density Switch 8800
and our cost-effective Switch 7750 products. |
|
|
§ |
|
Wireless LAN. We offer wireless networking products and solutions that
enable users to stay connected to the network while at their desks or
roaming within an enterprise or a large campus environment. The
productivity increase associated with this ease of information access
in a secure manner is driving many businesses to deploy wireless
networks. We offer a complete portfolio of high-performance,
standards-based wireless solutions, including 802.11 a/b/g wireless
standards, along with wireless security and policy enforcement. |
|
|
§ |
|
Routers. We offer routing solutions that bring enterprise-class WAN
routing features, redundancy and performance to the regional offices
of large enterprise customers and to the headquarters of medium-sized
businesses. We also offer router products which provide fixed
configuration solutions to securely connect small offices and remote
offices of large enterprises. |
6
|
§ |
|
Security. Leveraging the award winning TippingPoint Intrusion
Prevention System (IPS), DVBU has a complete line of unified threat
management (UTM) products that protect enterprises from the myriad of
threats. The X-family of products complements the switching and
wireless solutions to provide a fully secured network solution. |
|
|
§ |
|
Network Management. We offer flexible and comprehensive network
management application packages for advanced IT environments. Our
network management applications help our customers manage large and
small wired and wireless networks with tools for network monitoring,
device control and fast problem resolution. |
Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony
Voice communications are a mission critical function for businesses of all kinds and sizes around
the world. IP is ubiquitous today both within an enterprise and outside of it, providing the
ability for software applications and computers to communicate in an efficient manner. We offer a
broad portfolio of IP telephony products that work together to deliver business-focused
applications, including: next-generation dial tone, IP messaging, IP presence, IP conferencing, IP
mobility and IP customer contact center services. Our secure, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
based platform and applications are designed to meet the performance expectations of todays
business environments: cost effectiveness, increased user productivity and strengthened customer
interactions. Our IP telephony products fall within the following categories:
|
§ |
|
IP Telephony Platforms |
|
|
§ |
|
Convergence Application Suite |
|
|
§ |
|
IP Phones |
Services
Our DVBU segment provides our channel partners and customers a single point of accountability for
service performance and quality. Our global service offerings cover key aspects of support that
customers need to keep their data networking and voice solutions operating effectively, including
telephone support, hardware replacement, software updates, dedicated on-site engineers and spare
parts. We also offer high-end professional services and training to provide complete product plus
service solutions for our customers. Our portfolio of professional services includes assessment
and design, project management, training and certifications, installation, and integration services
that are especially important to our customers that purchase higher-end switches, routers and IP
telephony communications systems.
To deliver our services, we employ a team of highly skilled and professional in-house services
experts and also partner with select third party service providers. We also offer customers the
benefits of virtually integrated services resources. Additionally, we have agreements with local
and regional professional services providers to augment our onsite coverage and meet the demand for
our services.
TIPPINGPOINT SECURITY DIVISION (TIPPINGPOINT) SEGMENT PRODUCTS
Security
We have a comprehensive security portfolio that includes end-to-end solutions for core-to-edge
protection. Organizations can choose to implement overlaid or embedded security solutions that are
automatic and centrally manageable and which provide adaptive and dynamic protection.
Our security products include the following:
|
§ |
|
Intrusion Prevention Systems; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security Services; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Network Access Control. |
7
Intrusion Prevention Systems
Our TippingPoint line of intrusion prevention systems or IPS are hardware-based products designed
to analyze incoming data and prevent viruses and malicious traffic from entering the network. The
TippingPoint IPS utilizes high-speed network processors that can operate at multi-Gigabit speeds.
Our hardware platform is complemented by a robust security-oriented operating system and suite of
vulnerability filters that can be dynamically updated. Our TippingPoint IPS offers bandwidth
management, peer-to-peer protection, and default Recommended Settings to accurately block
malicious traffic automatically upon installation without tuning.
The TippingPoint IPS provides application protection, performance protection and infrastructure
protection through total packet inspection, which means that our system reviews all data processed
through it for viruses and other malicious traffic. Application protection capabilities provide
fast, accurate, reliable protection from internal and external cyber attacks. Through its
infrastructure protection capabilities, the TippingPoint IPS protects IP telephony infrastructure,
routers, switches, and other critical infrastructure from targeted attacks and traffic anomalies.
Our performance protection capabilities enable customers to throttle non-mission critical
applications that hijack valuable bandwidth and IT resources, thereby aligning network resources
and business-critical application performance.
The switch-like performance characteristics of the TippingPoint IPS allow it to be placed at the
core, in-line at the perimeter, on internal network segments, and at remote site locations with
minimal or no adverse network impact. Additionally, our IPS solutions are deployed and managed
using a scalable, tiered Security Management System (SMS). Using SMS, customers implement and
manage coherent, enterprise-wide security policies based on rules and thresholds set within the
SMS. The SMS offers a rich reporting system, allowing customized reports to be generated and
distributed automatically on a scheduled basis. Support for multiple user profiles allows a range
of users, such as administrators and executives, access to this management system.
Security Services
We provide a real-time update service, called the Digital Vaccine® service, which automatically and
rapidly delivers vulnerability filters against the latest threats. To facilitate the creation of
Digital Vaccine filters, our Threat Management Center monitors and collects security intelligence
from customers and security agencies around the world. Based on this intelligence, we perform
investigations of new software vulnerabilities and create antidotes that are delivered directly to
our products. Additionally we offer installation, training and high-touch maintenance programs for
our IPS equipment. Maintenance programs are offered as a bundled solution with our Digital Vaccine
updates.
Network Access Control
We offer Network Access Control (NAC) features which enable enterprises to enforce device and user
policies to ensure endpoint compliance, through our TippingPoint NAC Enforcer offering. NAC
enables enterprises to verify the identity of users before allowing them to access different levels
of the network. We are developing additional products for NAC functionality as well as
investigating the integration of this technology into other network offerings.
SALES, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
We use a broad distribution channel to bring our products and solutions to our customers. Our
two-tier distribution channel comprises distributors and resellers.
Although a majority of our sales of enterprise networking products are made through our two-tier
distribution channel, we also work with global systems integrators, service providers and direct
marketers. Additionally, we maintain a field sales organization targeting small, medium and large
enterprise accounts in conjunction with our partners.
8
COMPETITION
We compete in the networking infrastructure market, providing a broad portfolio of secure,
converged voice and data networking products to small, medium, and large size organizations and,
through our H3C segments OEM sales, carrier customers. The market for our products is
competitive, fragmented and rapidly changing. We expect competition to continue to intensify.
Many of our competitors are bringing new solutions to market, focusing on specific segments of our
target markets and establishing alliances and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) relationships
with larger companies, some of which are our partners as well.
Our principal competitors include Alcatel Lucent, Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., D-Link Systems,
Inc., Enterasys Networks, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc., F5 Networks, Inc., Foundry Networks, Inc.,
Hewlett-Packard Company, Juniper Networks, Inc., Mitel Networks Corporation, NETGEAR, Inc., and
Nortel Networks Corporation. In addition, H3C also competes with key regional competitors such as
Allied Telsis, Inc. (formerly Allied Telesyn), Buffalo Inc., Digital China, Hitachi, Huawei, and
ZTE Corporation. TippingPoints principal competitors are Cisco Systems, Inc., Internet Security
Systems, Inc. (acquired by IBM), McAfee, Inc., and Sourcefire, Inc. Many of our competitors are
larger than us and possess greater financial resources.
We believe the primary competitive factors in the enterprise networking infrastructure market are
as follows:
|
§
|
|
Maintain tier-one capability and presence. To maintain tier-one
capability and presence, a provider must have a comprehensive
distribution channel and a strong financial position. In addition,
that provider must have a globally-recognized and preferred brand and
provide strong service and support capabilities. |
|
|
§
|
|
Offer innovative products and solutions. To be considered innovative,
a provider must deliver a broad line of products and solutions and
maintain a substantial intellectual property portfolio. |
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our research and development approach is to focus on activities that deliver differentiated
products and solutions and drive reductions in product costs. Our current areas of focus include
security, convergence of applications over IP, advanced switching, routing solutions and other
advanced technologies. For activities such as mature technologies or widely available product
design components, we work with contract developers and third parties. We believe this two-part
approach increases our ability to bring products to market in a timely and cost effective manner
and ensures that we focus on those products that matter most to our customers and clearly
differentiate the products.
Our DVBU segment relies on H3Cs engineering talent for new product development of enterprise
switches and routers and on certain third party developers for small and medium size networking
offerings. Our DVBU segment develops its voice offerings. Our TippingPoint segment develops the
TippingPoint Intrusion Prevention Systems and Digital Vaccine security products and services. H3C
develops its H3C core product portfolio.
Our research and development expenditures were $206.7 million in fiscal 2008, $215.6 million in
fiscal 2007, and $101.9 million in fiscal 2006.
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND PRODUCTS
For information regarding customer and product concentration for each of the last three fiscal
years, see Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENT, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS AND EXPORT
SALES
Segment financial data are set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in Item 7, and in Note 19 of the Notes to the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements, which appears in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended May 31, 2008. A significant portion of our revenues are derived from overseas
operations. The profitability of our segments is affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to foreign currencies, particularly the Chinese Renminbi. See the Geographic
Information portion of Note 20 for further information relating to sales and long-lived assets by
geographic area and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
9
We market our products in all significant global markets, primarily through subsidiaries, sales
offices, sales representatives, and relationships with OEMs and distributors with local presence.
Outside the U.S., we have several research and development groups, with the two most significant
being in China and the U.K. We also use contract developers in India. We maintain sales offices
in 31 countries outside the U.S.
BACKLOG
Our
backlog as of May 30, 2008, the last day of our 2008 fiscal
year, was approximately $71.0 million (including $56.0 million of H3C backlog as of March 31, 2008), compared with backlog of
approximately $65.7 million (including $54.8 million of H3C backlog as of March 31, 2007) as of
June 1, 2007, the last day of our 2007 fiscal year. We include in our backlog purchase orders for
which a delivery schedule has been specified for product shipment within one year. Generally,
orders are placed by our customers on an as-needed basis and may be canceled or rescheduled by the
customers without significant penalty to the customer. Accordingly, backlog as of any particular
date is not necessarily indicative of our future sales.
SEASONALITY
Our H3C segments calendar first quarter generally experiences some seasonal effect on sales, due
to the Chinese New Year which typically falls during that quarter. Our DVBU and TippingPoint
segments revenues and earnings have not been impacted by seasonality to any significant degree.
MANUFACTURING AND COMPONENTS
For the DVBU and TippingPoint segments we outsource the majority of our manufacturing and our
supply chain management operations to contract manufacturers and original design manufacturer
suppliers, with our H3C segment handling the remainder of these functions. This is part of our
strategy to maintain global manufacturing capabilities and to reduce our costs. This subcontracting
includes activities such as material procurement, assembly, test, shipment to our customers and
repairs. We believe this approach enables us to reduce fixed costs and to quickly respond to
changes in market demand. We have contract manufacturing arrangements with several companies, of
which Jabil Circuits and Accton Technology Corp. were the two most significant during fiscal 2008
and fiscal 2007. Based on current and forecasted demand, our contract manufacturers are expected
to have an adequate supply of components required for the production of our products.
We determine the components that are incorporated in our products and design the supply chain
solution. Our suppliers manufacture based on rolling forecasts. Each of the suppliers procures
components necessary to assemble the products in our forecast and test the products according to
our specifications. Products are then shipped directly to our logistics provider. We generally do
not own the components and our customers take title to our products upon shipment from the
logistics provider or, in certain jurisdictions, upon payment. In certain circumstances, we may be
liable to our suppliers for carrying costs and obsolete material charges for excess components
purchased based on our forecasts.
For the H3C segment, a significant portion of self-designed products are also manufactured by
contract manufacturers, mainly Flextronics, System Integration Electronics and Flash Electronics.
However, H3C does retain an in-house manufacturing capability and capacity for pilot run, low
volume production, as well as special projects, and this capability includes a state-of-the-art SMT
(surface mount technology) line, backend assembly and test lines and distribution facilities. H3C
typically takes title to the product directly from the contract manufacturer, builds an inventory
position for forecasted sales and ships to the customers designated delivery hub.
Although we have contracts with our manufacturers, those contracts set forth a framework within
which the supplier may accept purchase orders from us. The contracts do not require them to
manufacture our products on a long-term basis.
We use standard parts and components for our products where it is appropriate. We purchase certain
key components used in the manufacture of our products from single or limited sources.
Purchase commitments with our single- or limited-source suppliers are generally on a purchase order
basis. A number of vendors supply standard product integrated circuits and microprocessors for our
products.
10
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED MATTERS
Through our research and development activities over many years, we have developed a substantial
portfolio of patents covering a wide variety of networking technologies. This ownership of core
networking technologies creates opportunities to leverage our engineering investments and develop
more integrated, powerful, and innovative networking solutions for customers.
We rely on U.S. and foreign patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets to establish and
maintain proprietary rights in our technology and products. We have an active program to file
applications for and obtain patents in the U.S. and in selected foreign countries where potential
markets for our products exist. Our general policy has been to seek to patent those patentable
inventions that we expect to incorporate in our products or that we expect will be valuable
otherwise. As of May 30, 2008, our DVBU segment had 1,425 issued U.S. patents (including 1,393
utility patents and 32 design patents) and 403 foreign issued patents. As of May 30, 2008, our
TippingPoint segment had 7 issued U.S. patents (all of which are utility patents). Numerous patent
applications that relate to our research and development activities are currently pending in the
U.S. and other countries. We also have patent cross license agreements with other companies. As of
March 31, 2008, the H3C portfolio includes 180 issued Chinese patents, over 1,050 pending Chinese
applications, and 35 pending foreign applications. During fiscal 2008, we continued our patent
licensing program, through which we identify potential sources of licensing revenue, including
investigation of situations in which we believe that other companies may be improperly using our
patented technology.
Our DVBU segment has 37 registered trademarks in the U.S. and has a total of 524 registered
trademarks in 77 foreign jurisdictions. Our TippingPoint segment has 9 registered trademarks in the
U.S. and has a total of 25 registered trademarks in 9 foreign jurisdictions. H3C has 10 registered
trademarks in China and has a total of 58 registered trademarks in 14 foreign jurisdictions.
Numerous applications for registration of domestic and foreign trademarks are currently pending for
our DVBU, TippingPoint and H3C segments.
EMPLOYEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,826 |
|
Customer service and supply chain operations |
|
|
983 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,772 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The H3C
segment has 4,684 employees, the DVBU segment has 920 employees, the TippingPoint segment
has 287 employees and the Corporate segment has 212 employees.
Our employees are not represented by a labor organization and we consider our employee relations to
be satisfactory. The DVBU, TippingPoint, and Corporate segments employee data is as of May 30,
2008 and the H3C segment employee data is as of March 31, 2008, the date of the H3C balance sheet
we consolidated into our 2008 fiscal year end balance sheet.
Please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for a discussion of certain restructuring actions affecting DVBU employee headcount.
11
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table lists the names, ages and positions held by all executive officers of 3Com as
of July 25, 2008. There are no family relationships between any director (or nominee) or executive
officer and any other director (or nominee) or executive officer of 3Com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Robert Y. L. Mao
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Ronald A. Sege
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
Jay Zager
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Neal D. Goldman
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer and Secretary |
Dr. Shusheng Zheng
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, H3C |
In addition, the foregoing individuals serve on the Boards of Directors of various subsidiaries of
3Com.
Robert Y. L. Mao has been our Chief Executive Officer since April 2008 and a member of our Board of
Directors since March 2007. Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mao was most
recently our Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from August 2006 to March 2007.
Mr. Mao has over 30 years of experience in the telecommunications and IT industries. Before
joining 3Com, Mr. Mao was President and Chief Executive Officer of Greater China for Nortel
Networks from September 1997 to May 2006 and Regional President of Greater China for Alcatel from
September 1995 to September 1997. Nortel and Alcatel are global suppliers of communication
equipment serving both service provider and enterprise customers. At these positions, Mr. Mao
managed operations in the Peoples Republic of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao. Mr. Mao also
held senior managerial and technical positions at Alcatel and ITT in Asia and the U.S. Mr. Mao
holds a Masters degree from Cornell University in Material Science and Metallurgical Engineering
and earned a Masters in Management from MIT. Mr. Mao is the past Vice Chairman of the Board of
Governors of the Pacific Telecommunication Council (from 2003 to 2005). Mr. Mao serves on the
Board of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd., a wireless value-added services provider.
Ronald A. Sege has been our President and Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Board of
Directors since April 2008. Mr. Sege most recently served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Tropos Networks, Inc. a provider of wireless broadband networks, from 2004 to 2008. He is
currently a member of Tropos Board of Advisors. Prior to Tropos, Mr. Sege was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Ellacoya Networks, Inc. a provider of broadband service optimization solutions
based on deep packet inspection technology, from 2001 to 2004. Prior to Ellacoya, Mr. Sege was
Executive Vice President of Lycos, Inc., an internet search engine, from 1998 to 2001. Prior to
Lycos, Mr. Sege spent nine years at 3Com Corporation, from 1989 to 1998, serving in a variety of
senior management roles including Executive Vice President, Global Systems Business Unit. Mr. Sege
holds an MBA from Harvard University and a BA from Pomona College.
Jay Zager has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since June 2007.
Immediately prior to joining 3Com, Mr. Zager was an executive at Gerber Scientific, Inc., a leading
international supplier of sophisticated automated manufacturing systems for sign making and
specialty graphics, apparel and flexible materials, and ophthalmic lens processing. Mr. Zager
joined Gerber in February 2005 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was
appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2006, a position he held
until he left the company in June 2007. As a member of the senior management team of Gerber, he
was responsible for financial reporting, accounting, treasury operations, business planning,
corporate development, investor relations, tax/pension administration and information technology.
Prior to joining Gerber, Mr. Zager was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Helix
Technology Corp., a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, from February 2002 to February 2005.
Earlier, from 2000 to 2001, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inrange
Technologies Corp., a storage networking company. Before Inrange, he was with the Compaq/Digital
Equipment organization for 14 years, holding a number of senior financial and business management
positions including Vice President, Business Development and Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer of Worldwide Engineering & Research. Mr. Zager received a Masters degree in Finance and
Strategic Planning from the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a
Bachelor of Science degree in Operations Research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12
Neal D. Goldman has been 3Coms Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer
and Secretary since March 2007, and he served as our Senior Vice President, Management Services,
General Counsel and Secretary from September 2003 until March 2007. Prior to joining 3Com,
Mr. Goldman worked for Polaroid Corporation from August 1997 to September 2003. From March 2003 to
September 2003, he was Executive Vice President, Business Development and Chief Legal Officer of
Polaroid and prior to that Mr. Goldman served as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and
Legal Officer from July 2001 to June 2002. From August 1997 to July 2001, Mr. Goldman held a number
of senior management and executive positions at Polaroid, including Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary and Deputy General Counsel. Before joining Polaroid, Mr. Goldman served as
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Nets, Inc. from March 1996 to June 1997. Before
joining Nets, Inc., Mr. Goldman held a number of positions with Lotus Development Corporation,
including Vice President and General Counsel from November 1995 to February 1996 and Deputy General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary from April 1990 to November 1995.
Dr. Shusheng Zheng has served as our Executive Vice President since May 2008 and as the Chief
Operating Officer of our China-based H3C subsidiary since its inception in the fall of 2003.
Previously, Dr. Zheng worked at Huawei Technologies, a leading telecommunications equipment
provider based in China, from 1993 to 2003. At Huawei, Dr. Zheng held several senior management
positions, including manager in the research and development department, Director of Manufacturing
and Customer Service, Head of Sales and Marketing for the datacom business, and President of the
switching business unit. Dr. Zheng holds a PhD in Telecommunication Science from Zhejiang
University in China.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk factors may affect our future business and results. The matters discussed below could cause
our future results to materially differ from past results or those described in forward-looking
statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and stock price.
Risks Related to Historical Losses, Financial Condition and Substantial Indebtedness
We have incurred significant net losses in recent fiscal periods, including $228.8 million for the
fiscal year ended May 30, 2008, and we may not be able to return to profitability.
We cannot provide assurance that we will return to profitability. While we continue to take steps
designed to improve our results of operations, we have incurred significant net losses in recent
periods. We face a number of challenges that have affected our operating results during the
current and past several fiscal years. Specifically, we have experienced, and may continue to
experience, the following:
|
|
|
declining sales due to price competition and reduced incoming order rate; |
|
|
|
|
operating expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded our desired financial
model; |
|
|
|
|
significant senior leadership and other management changes; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions and expenses resulting from our workforce reductions and employee attrition;
and |
|
|
|
|
interest expense resulting from our senior secured loan. |
If we do not increase our sales, we may need to further reduce costs in order to achieve
profitability. As we have implemented significant cost reduction programs over the last several
years, it may be difficult to make significant further cost reductions without in turn impacting
our sales. Restructuring activity could also make it more difficult for us to address all of our
legal and regulatory obligations in an effective manner, which could lead to penalties. In
addition, we may choose to reinvest some or all of our realized cost savings in future growth
opportunities or in our H3C integration efforts. Any of these events or occurrences will likely
cause our expense levels to continue to be at levels above our desired model.
If we cannot overcome these challenges, reduce our expenses and/or increase our revenue, we may not
become profitable (and if we become profitable, to sustain such profitability).
13
Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial condition; and the related debt service
obligations may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to invest in and grow our businesses.
We now have, and for the foreseeable future will continue to have, a significant amount of
indebtedness. As of May 30, 2008, our total debt balance was $301 million, of which $48 million is
due within one year and was classified as a current liability. In addition, despite current debt
levels, the terms of our indebtedness allow us or our subsidiaries to incur more debt, subject to
certain limitations.
While our senior secured loan is outstanding, we will have annual debt obligations of between
approximately $48 million and $137 million. The interest rate on this loan is floating based on
the LIBOR rate; accordingly, if the LIBOR rate is increased, these amounts could be higher. The
maturity date on this loan is September 28, 2012. We intend to fulfill our debt service
obligations primarily from cash generated by our H3C segment operations, if any, and, to the extent
necessary, from its existing cash and investments. Because we anticipate that a substantial
portion of the cash generated by our operations will be used to service this loan during its term,
such funds will not be available to use in future operations, or investing in our businesses.
Further, a significant portion of the excess cash flow generated by our H3C segment, if any, must
be used annually to prepay principal on the loan. The foregoing may adversely impact our ability
to expand our businesses or make other investments. In addition, if we are unable to generate
sufficient cash to meet these obligations and must instead use our existing cash or investments, we
may have to reduce, curtail or terminate other activities of our businesses.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences to us. For example, it could:
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
require the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the
payment of principal of, and interest on, our indebtedness, thereby reducing the
availability of such cash flow to fund growth, working capital, capital expenditures and
other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our
industry; and |
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt. |
The restrictions imposed by the terms of our senior secured loan facility could adversely impact
our ability to invest in and grow our H3C business.
Covenants in the agreements governing our senior secured loan materially restrict our H3C
operations, including H3Cs ability to incur debt, pay dividends, make certain investments and
payments, make acquisitions of other businesses and encumber or dispose of assets. These negative
covenants restrict our flexibility in operating our H3C business. In addition, in the event our
H3C segments financial results do not meet our plans, the failure to comply with the financial
covenants contained in the loan agreements could lead to a default. Our lenders may attempt to
call defaults for violations of financial covenants (or other items, even if the underlying
financial performance of H3C is satisfactory) in an effort to extract waiver or consent fees from
us or to force a refinancing. A default and acceleration under one debt instrument or other
contract may also trigger cross-acceleration under other debt instruments or other agreements, if
any. An event of default, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us
because the lenders will be able to accelerate all outstanding amounts under the loan or foreclose
on the collateral (which consists primarily of the assets of our H3C segment and could involve the
lenders taking control over our H3C segment). Any of these actions would likely result in a
material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
14
Risks Related to H3C Segment and Dependence Thereon
We are significantly dependent on our H3C segment; if H3C is not successful we will likely
experience a material adverse impact to our business, business prospects and operating results.
For the fiscal year ended May 30, 2008, H3C accounted for approximately 60 percent of our
consolidated revenue and approximately 65 percent of our consolidated gross profit. In addition to
China-related risks discussed elsewhere in this filing, H3C is subject to specific risks relating
to its ability to:
|
|
|
maintain a leading position in the networking equipment market in China; |
|
|
|
|
build profitable operations in other emerging markets throughout the world, but
particularly in the Asia Pacific region; |
|
|
|
|
offer new and innovative products and services to attract and retain a larger customer
base; |
|
|
|
|
increase awareness of the H3C brand and continue to develop customer loyalty; |
|
|
|
|
respond to rapidly changing competitive market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
respond to changes in the regulatory environment; |
|
|
|
|
manage risks associated with intellectual property rights, particularly in China; |
|
|
|
|
maintain effective control of costs and expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
H3C has been growing and profitable since inception, and maintains a leading position in many
market categories in China. It has experienced growth in recent periods in part due to the growth
in Chinas technology industry, which may not be representative of future growth or be sustainable.
Companies that have leading positions may find it more challenging to grow in their markets. We
cannot therefore assure you that H3Cs historical financial information is indicative of its future
operating results or future financial performance, or that its profitability will be sustained.
H3C faces competition from domestic Chinese industry participants, and as a foreign-owned business,
may not be as successful in selling to Chinese customers, particularly those in the public sector,
to the extent that such customers favor Chinese-owned competitors.
Given the significance of H3C to our financial results, if H3C is not successful, our business will
likely be adversely affected.
We are dependent to a large extent on sales in China, and may face difficulty growing our China
business in the future due to our existing leading market share in China and the economic,
political and social risks inherent in that country.
Our sales are significantly dependent on China, with approximately 47 percent of our consolidated
revenues attributable to sales in China for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2008. We expect that a
significant portion of our sales will continue to be derived from China for the foreseeable future.
As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations are to a significant
degree subject to economic, political, legal and social developments and other events in China and
surrounding areas. In addition, because we already have a significant percentage of the market
share in China for enterprise networking products (and together with
Cisco represent a substantial portion of that market), our opportunities to grow market share in China are more limited than in the
past. We discuss risks related to the PRC in further detail below.
We are dependent on Huawei Technologies (Huawei) in several material respects, including as an
important customer; we expect Huawei to reduce its business with H3C, which could materially
adversely affect our business results.
H3C derives a material portion of its sales from Huawei, which formerly held a significant
investment in H3C. In the three months ended May 30, 2008, which includes results from H3Cs March
31, 2008 quarter, Huawei accounted for approximately 26 percent of the revenue for our H3C segment
and approximately 15 percent of our consolidated revenue. In the twelve months ended May 30, 2008,
Huawei accounted for approximately 29 percent of the revenue for our H3C segment and approximately
17 percent of our consolidated revenue. Huaweis percentage of H3Cs revenues has been trending
downward from 41 percent, during the three months ended
November 30, 2006, to the current level, and we expect this downward trend to continue. We
further expect that Huawei will in the future reduce its business with H3C and, accordingly, that
its purchases in absolute dollars will decrease. Huawei does not have any minimum purchase
requirements under our existing OEM agreement, which expires in November 2008. While we are
seeking a renewal of that agreement, we may not be able to renew it. In sum, we risk the
possibility that Huawei sources products from another vendor or internally develops these products.
We need to develop additional channels within China and in other regions, including channels to
the carrier market, and we believe in any case that increasing our DVBU segments sales of H3C
products is highly important to H3Cs global growth opportunities. If we fail in these efforts,
15
our business will suffer. Further, we have and expect to continue to incur costs relating to
transition matters with respect to support that Huawei previously provided for H3C when it was a
shareholder. In addition, our China headquarters in Hangzhou, PRC is owned by Huawei and leased to
us under a lease agreement that expires in January 2009; if we cannot renew this lease on terms
favorable to us or find alternate facilities, we may suffer disruption in our H3C business. If any
of the above risks occur, it will likely have an adverse impact on H3Cs sales and business
performance.
We must execute on a global strategy to leverage the benefits of our H3C acquisition, including
integration activities to operate more effectively as one company; if we are not successful in
these efforts, our business will suffer.
Our acquisition of H3C presents unique challenges that we must address. We must successfully
execute on managing our operating segments, and, to the extent we so choose, integrating these
businesses, in order to fully benefit from this acquisition. As a joint venture owned by two
separate companies until March 2007, H3C historically operated in many ways independently from 3Com
and Huawei. H3Cs business is largely based in the PRC and therefore significant cultural,
language, business process and other differences exist between our other segments and H3C. In
order to more closely manage and integrate our legacy 3Com and H3C businesses, we expect to incur
significant transition costs, including management retention costs and other related items. There
may also be business disruption as management and other personnel focus on global management
activities and integration matters.
In order to realize the full benefits of this acquisition, we will need to manage our operating
segments and employ strategies to leverage H3C. These efforts will require significant time and
attention of management and other key employees at 3Com and H3C. Depending on the decisions we
make on various strategic alternatives available to us, we may develop new or adjusted global
design and development initiatives, go-to-market strategies, branding tactics, unified back office,
supply chain and IT systems, streamlined engineering efforts or other strategies that take
advantage and leverage H3Cs and our other segments respective strengths. The terms of our
existing H3C senior secured indebtedness may make these efforts more difficult to the extent they
limit or prohibit our ability to fully integrate H3C. If we do not execute on a global strategy that enables us
to leverage the benefits of this acquisition, our business will be substantially harmed.
If we cannot continue to increase our DVBU segments sales of H3C products outside of China, we
will likely find it increasingly difficult to grow our overall business.
We believe that increasing our DVBU segments sales of H3C products is highly important to 3Coms
global growth opportunities and ultimately to our consolidated growth. If we fail in these
efforts, our business will suffer.
Risk Related to Personnel
Our success is dependent on continuing to hire and retain qualified managers and other personnel,
including at our H3C segment, and reducing senior management turnover in our other segments; if we
are not successful in attracting and retaining these personnel, our business will suffer.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. If we fail to attract, hire, or retain qualified
personnel, our business will be harmed. We have experienced significant turnover in our senior
management team in the last several years and we may continue to experience change at this level.
If we cannot retain qualified senior managers and provide stability in the senior management team
to enable them to work together for an extended period of time, our business may not succeed.
The senior management team at H3C has been highly effective since H3Cs inception in 2003. We need
to continue to incentivize and retain H3C management. We cannot be sure that we will be successful
in these efforts. If we are not successful, our H3C business may suffer, which, in turn, will have
a material adverse impact on our consolidated business. Many of these senior managers, and other
key H3C employees, originally worked for Huawei prior to the inception of H3C. Subject to
non-competition agreements with us (if applicable), these employees could return to work for Huawei
at any time. Huawei is not subject to any non-solicitation obligations in respect of H3C or 3Com.
Further, former Huawei employees that work for H3C may retain financial interests in Huawei.
In addition, due to our recent merger transaction with affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, LLC
that did not close, and the recent decline in our stock price, we believe it will be substantially
more difficult to retain key employees and we will likely need to take significant actions to
retain these individuals over time. If we are not successful in these retention efforts, our
business will likely suffer.
16
Risks Related to Competition
Intense competition in the market for networking solutions could prevent us from maintaining or
increasing revenue and achieving profitability.
The market for networking solutions is intensely competitive. In particular, Cisco maintains a
dominant position in this market and several of its products compete directly with our products.
Ciscos substantial resources and market dominance have enabled it to reduce prices on its products
within a short period of time following the introduction of these products, which typically causes
its competitors to reduce prices and, therefore, the margins and the overall profitability of its
competitors. Purchasers of networking solutions may choose Ciscos products because of its broader
product line and strong reputation in the networking market. In addition, Cisco may have
developed, or could in the future develop, new technologies that directly compete with our products
or render our products obsolete. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to compete
successfully against Cisco, currently the leading provider in the networking market.
We also compete with several other significant companies in the networking industry. Some of our
current and potential competitors have greater market leverage, longer operating histories, greater
financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, more name recognition and larger
installed customer bases. Additionally, we may face competition from unknown companies and
emerging technologies that may offer new networking solutions. Furthermore, a number of these
competitors may merge or form strategic relationships that would enable them to apply greater
resources and sales coverage than we can, and to offer, or bring to market earlier, products that
are superior to ours in terms of features, quality, pricing or a combination of these and other
factors.
In order to remain competitive, we must, among other things, invest significant resources in
developing new products with superior performance at lower prices than our competitors, enhance our
current products and maintain customer satisfaction. In addition, we must make certain our sales
and marketing capabilities allow us to compete effectively against our competitors. If we fail to
do so, our products may not compete favorably with those of our competitors and our revenue and
profitability could suffer.
Our competition with Huawei in the enterprise networking market could have a material adverse
effect on our sales and our results of operations; and after a contractual non-compete period
expires, Huawei can increase its level of competition, which would likely materially and adversely
affect our business.
As Huawei expands its international operations, there could be increasing instances where we
compete directly with Huawei in the enterprise networking market. As an OEM customer of H3C,
Huawei has had, and continues to have, access to H3Cs products for resale. This access enhances
Huaweis current ability to compete directly with us. We could lose a competitive advantage in
markets where we compete with Huawei, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our
sales and overall results of operations. In addition, Huaweis obligation not to offer or sell
enterprise class, and small-to-medium size business (or SMB), routers and switches that are
competitive with H3Cs products continues until September 29, 2008. After that date, we are
subject to the risk of increased competition from Huawei, which could materially harm our results
of operations. More specifically, after the non-compete period expires, Huawei may offer and sell
its own enterprise or SMB routers and switches, or resell products that it sources from our
competitors. Huawei is not prohibited from developing (but is prohibited from offering or selling) competing
products during the non-compete period. Huawei is also not prohibited from currently selling
products in ancillary areassuch as security, voice over internet protocol and storage
productsthat are also sold today by H3C. We compete in those ancillary product areas today. If
Huawei chooses to increase its competition with us, or if we do not compete favorably with Huawei,
it is likely that our H3C business results, particularly in the Asia Pacific region and
specifically in China, will be materially and negatively affected.
Huaweis incentive not to compete with H3C or us, and its incentive to assist H3C, is more likely
to diminish now that Huawei does not own any interest in H3C and our merger transaction with
affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, LLC (in which Huawei would have participated as a minority
investor) was not consummated. In addition, Huawei maintains a strong presence within China and
the Asia Pacific region and has significant resources with which to compete within the networking
industry, including the assets of Harbour Networks, a China-based competitor of H3C that possesses
enterprise networking products and technology. In sum, we risk the possibility that Huawei sources
products from another vendor or internally develops these products. We cannot predict whether
Huawei will compete with us. If competition from Huawei increases, our business will likely
suffer.
17
Finally, if any of H3Cs senior managers, and other key H3C employees that originally worked for
Huawei prior to the inception of H3C, return to work for Huawei, the competitive risks discussed
above may be heightened. Subject to non-competition agreements with us (if applicable), these
employees could return to work for Huawei at any time. Huawei is not subject to any
non-solicitation obligations in respect of H3C or 3Com. Further, former Huawei employees that work
for H3C may retain financial interests in Huawei.
Risks Related to Business and Technology Strategy
We may not be successful at identifying and responding to new and emerging market and product
opportunities, or at responding quickly enough to technologies or markets that are in decline.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technology transitions and short product
life cycles. Therefore, our success depends on our ability to do the following:
|
|
|
identify new market and product opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
predict which technologies and markets will see declining demand; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and solutions in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
gain market acceptance of new products and solutions, particularly in targeted emerging
markets; and |
|
|
|
|
rapidly and efficiently transition our customers from older to newer enterprise
networking technologies. |
Our financial position or results of operations could suffer if we are not successful in achieving
these goals. For example, our business would suffer if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
there is a delay in introducing new products; |
|
|
|
|
we lose certain channels of distribution or key partners; |
|
|
|
|
our products do not satisfy customers in terms of features, functionality or quality; or |
|
|
|
|
our products cost more to produce than we expect. |
Because we will continue to rely on original design manufacturers to assist in product design of
some of our products, we may not be able to respond to emerging technology trends through the
design and production of new products as well as if we were working independently.
We expect to utilize strategic relationships and other alliances as key elements in our strategy.
If we are not successful in forming desired ventures and alliances or if such ventures and
alliances are not successful, our ability to achieve our growth and profitability goals could be
adversely affected.
We have announced alliances with third parties. In the future, we expect to evaluate other possible
strategic relationships, including joint ventures and other types of alliances, and we may increase
our reliance on such strategic relationships to broaden our sales channels, complement internal
development of new technologies and enhancement of existing products, and exploit perceived market
opportunities. For example, we intend to seek additional channel partners for the Chinese carrier
market.
If we fail to form the number and quality of strategic relationships that we desire, or if such
strategic relationships are not successful, we could suffer missed market opportunities, channel
conflicts, delays in product development or delivery, or other operational difficulties. Further,
if third parties acquire our strategic partners or if our competitors enter into successful
strategic relationships, we may face increased competition. Any of these difficulties could have
an adverse effect on our future sales and results of operations.
Our strategy of outsourcing functions and operations may fail to reduce cost and may disrupt our
operations.
We continue to look for ways to decrease cost and improve efficiency by contracting with other
companies to perform functions or operations that, in the past, we have performed ourselves. We
have outsourced the majority of our manufacturing and logistics for our non-H3C products. We now
rely on outside vendors to meet the majority of our manufacturing needs as well as a significant
portion of our IT needs for the non-H3C segments. Additionally, we outsource certain functions for
technical support and product return services. If we do not provide our customers with a high
quality of service, we risk losing customers and/or increasing our support costs.
18
Although we believe that outsourcing will result in lower costs and increased efficiencies, this
may not be the case. Because these third parties may not be as responsive to our needs as we would
be ourselves, outsourcing increases the risk of disruption to our operations. In addition, our
agreements with these third parties sometimes include substantial penalties for terminating such
agreements early or failing to maintain minimum service levels. Because we cannot always predict
how long we will need the services or how much of the services we will use, we may have to pay
these penalties or incur costs if our business conditions change.
Our reliance on industry standards, technological change in the marketplace, and new product
initiatives may cause our sales to fluctuate or decline.
The enterprise networking industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid changes in
technology and customer requirements and evolving industry standards. As a result, our success
depends on:
|
|
|
the convergence of technologies, such as voice, data and video on single, secure
networks; |
|
|
|
|
the timely adoption and market acceptance of industry standards, and timely resolution
of conflicting U.S. and international industry standards; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to influence the development of emerging industry standards and to introduce
new and enhanced products that are compatible with such standards. |
Slow market acceptance of new technologies, products, or industry standards could adversely affect
our sales or overall results of operations. In addition, if our technology is not included in an
industry standard on a timely basis or if we fail to achieve timely certification of compliance to
industry standards for our products, our sales of such products or our overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
We focus on enterprise networking, and our results of operations may fluctuate based on factors
related entirely to conditions in this market.
Our focus on enterprise networking may cause increased sensitivity to the business risks associated
specifically with the enterprise networking market and our ability to execute successfully on our
strategies to provide superior solutions for larger and multi-site enterprise environments. To be
successful in the enterprise networking market, we will need to be perceived by decision making
officers of large enterprises as committed for the long-term to the high-end networking business.
Also, expansion of sales to large enterprises may be disruptive in a variety of ways, such as
adding larger systems integrators that may raise channel conflict issues with existing
distributors, or a perception of diminished focus on the small and medium enterprise market.
Risks Related to Operations and Distribution Channels
A significant portion of our sales is derived from a small number of distributors. If any of these
partners reduces its business with us, our business could be adversely affected.
We distribute many of our products through two-tier distribution channels that include
distributors, systems integrators and value added resellers, or VARs. A significant portion of our
sales is concentrated among a few distributors; our two largest distributors accounted for a
combined 17 percent of our consolidated revenue for the twelve months ended May 30, 2008. If
either of these distributors reduces its business with us, our sales and overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
We depend on distributors who maintain inventories of our products. If the distributors reduce
their inventories of our products, our sales could be adversely affected.
We work closely with our distributors to monitor channel inventory levels and ensure that
appropriate levels of products are available to resellers and end users. Our target range for
channel inventory levels is between three and five weeks of supply on hand at our distributors.
Partners with a below-average inventory level may incur stock outs that would adversely impact
our sales. Our distribution agreements typically provide that our distributors may cancel their
orders on short notice with little or no penalty. If our channel partners reduce their levels of
inventory of our products, our sales would be negatively impacted during the period of change.
19
If we are unable to successfully develop relationships with system integrators, service providers,
and enterprise VARs, our sales may be negatively affected.
As part of our sales strategy, we are targeting system integrators, or SIs, service providers, or
SPs, and enterprise value-added resellers, or eVARs. In addition to specialized technical
expertise, SIs, SPs and eVARs typically offer sophisticated services capabilities that are
frequently desired by larger enterprise customers. In order to expand our distribution channel to
include resellers with such capabilities, we must be able to provide effective support to these
resellers. If our sales, marketing or services capabilities are not sufficiently robust to provide
effective support to such SIs, SPs, and eVARs, we may not be successful in expanding our
distribution model and current SI, SP, and eVAR partners may terminate their relationships with us,
which would adversely impact our sales and overall results of operations.
We may pursue acquisitions of other companies that, if not successful, could adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of companies to enhance our existing capabilities. There
can be no assurances that acquisitions we might consummate will be successful. If we pursue an
acquisition but are not successful in completing it, or if we complete an acquisition but are not
successful in integrating the acquired companys technology, employees, products or operations
successfully, our business, financial position or results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We may be unable to manage our supply chain successfully, which would adversely impact our sales,
gross margin and profitability.
Current business conditions and operational challenges in managing our supply chain affect our
business in a number of ways:
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast demand is diminished; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on, and long-term arrangements with, third-party manufacturers places much
of the supply chain process out of our direct control and heightens the need for accurate
forecasting and reduces our ability to transition quickly to alternative supply chain
strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
we may experience disruptions to our logistics. |
We cannot be certain that in the future our suppliers, particularly those who are also in active
competition with us, will be able or willing to meet our demand for components in a timely and
cost-effective manner. There has been a trend toward consolidation of vendors of electronic
components. Our reliance on a smaller number of vendors and the inability to quickly switch
vendors increases the risk of logistics disruptions, unfavorable price fluctuations, or disruptions
in supply, particularly in a supply-constrained environment. Supplies of certain key components
have become tighter as industry demand for such components has increased. If the resulting
increase in component costs and time necessary to obtain these components persists, we may
experience an adverse impact to gross margin.
If overall demand for our products or the mix of demand for our products is significantly different
from our expectations, we may face inadequate or excess component supply or inadequate or excess
manufacturing capacity. This would result in orders for products that could not be manufactured in
a timely manner, or a buildup of inventory that could not easily be sold. Either of these
situations could adversely affect our market share, sales, and results of operations or financial
position.
The inability of any contract manufacturer to meet our cost, quality or performance standards could
adversely affect our sales and overall results from operations.
The cost, quality, performance, and availability of contract manufacturing operations are and will
be essential to the successful production and sale of many of our products. We may not be able to
provide contract manufacturers with product volumes that are high enough to achieve sufficient cost
savings. If shipments fall below forecasted levels, we may incur increased costs or be required to
take ownership of inventory. In addition, a significant component of maintaining cost
competitiveness is the ability of our contract manufacturers to adjust their own costs and
manufacturing infrastructure to compensate for possible adverse exchange rate movements. To the
extent that the contract manufacturers are unable to do so, and we are unable to procure
alternative product supplies, then our own competitiveness and results of operations could be
adversely impacted.
20
In portions of our business we have implemented a program with our manufacturing partners to ship
products directly from regional shipping centers to customers. Through this program, we are
relying on these partners to fill customer orders in a timely manner. This program may not yield
the efficiencies that we expect, which would negatively impact our results of operations. Any
disruptions to on-time delivery to customers would adversely impact our sales and overall results
of operations.
If we fail to adequately evolve our financial and managerial control and reporting systems and
processes, including the management of our H3C segment, our ability to manage and grow our business
will be negatively affected.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and implement our business plan in a rapidly
evolving market depends upon an effective planning and management process. We will need to
continue to improve our financial and managerial control and our reporting systems and procedures
in order to manage our business effectively in the future. If we fail to implement improved
systems and processes, our ability to manage our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected. For example, now that we own all of H3C, we are spending additional time,
resources and capital to manage its business, operations and financial results. If we are not able
to successfully manage H3C, our business results could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Operations in the Peoples Republic of China
Chinas governmental and regulatory reforms and changing economic environment may impact our
ability to do business in China.
As a result of the historic reforms of the past several decades, multiple government bodies are
involved in regulating and administrating affairs in the enterprise networking industry in China.
These government agencies have broad discretion and authority over all aspects of the networking,
telecommunications and information technology industry in China; accordingly their decisions may
impact our ability to do business in China. Any of the following changes in Chinas political and
economic conditions and governmental policies could have a substantial impact on our business:
|
|
|
the promulgation of new laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and
regulations; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement and application of rules and regulations by the Chinese government; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of measures to control inflation or stimulate growth; or |
|
|
|
|
any actions that limit our ability to develop, manufacture, import or sell our products
in China, or to finance and operate our business in China. |
Due to our dependence on China, if China were to experience a broad and prolonged economic
slowdown, our results of operations would suffer. The Chinese government has from time-to-time
implemented certain measures to control the pace of economic growth. Such measures may cause a
decrease in the level of economic activity in China, which in turn could adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect us.
We conduct our business in China primarily through H3C, a Hong Kong entity which in turn owns
several Chinese entities. These entities are generally subject to laws and regulations applicable
to foreign investment in China. In addition, there are uncertainties regarding the interpretation
and enforcement of laws, rules and policies in China. Because many laws and regulations are
relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still evolving, the interpretations of many laws,
regulations and rules are not always uniform. Moreover, the interpretation of statutes and
regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic political changes. Finally,
enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on existing law may be uncertain, and it may be
difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement, or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a
court of another jurisdiction. Any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and managements attention.
21
If PRC tax benefits available to H3C are reduced or repealed, our business could suffer.
Effective January 1, 2008, the PRC has enacted a new tax law, which introduces a new corporate
income tax rate of 25 percent. Companies which benefited from preferential tax rates and rulings
under the previous tax law can continue to enjoy those concessions, subject to transitional rules.
Our H3C subsidiary in China was entitled to tax concessions which began in 2004 and exempted it
from the PRC income tax for its initial two years and entitle it to a 50 percent reduction in
income tax in the following three years. Calendar 2008 will be the final year of that 50 percent
reduction. The new tax law provides for a reduced tax rate of 15 percent for companies which
qualify as new and high technology enterprises. Based on the draft regulations, we believe that
our H3C subsidiary in China will qualify for this reduced rate. If H3C is not entitled to new and
high technology enterprise treatment under this new law (due to the publication of new regulations
or the interpretation of existing law or regulation or otherwise), if other tax benefits currently
enjoyed by H3C are withdrawn or reduced, or if new taxes are introduced which have not applied to
H3C before, there would likely be a resulting increase to H3Cs statutory tax rates in the PRC.
Increases to tax rates in the PRC, where our H3C segment is profitable, could adversely affect our
results of operations and cash flow. If we do not qualify for the reduced rate, the statutory
income tax rate in China will be 9% for 2008, 20% for 2009, 22% for 2010, 24% for 2011, and 25%
thereafter.
H3C is subject to restrictions on paying dividends and making other payments to us.
Chinese regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits, as
determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. H3C does business
primarily through a Chinese entity that is required to set aside a portion of its after-tax profits
currently 10 percent according to Chinese accounting standards and regulations to fund
certain reserves. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of Renminbi into
foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties in
completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. These
restrictions may in the future limit our ability to receive dividends or repatriate funds from H3C.
In addition, the credit agreement governing our senior secured loan also imposes significant
restrictions on H3Cs ability to dividend or make other payments to our other segments. Finally,
the new PRC tax law, effective January 1, 2008, imposes a withholding tax on certain payments by
entities resident in PRC to entities outside of the PRC (including Hong Kong). Regulations have now
been issued which confirm that this withholding tax will apply to dividends and other distributions
made by our H3C subsidiary in China. Consequently, all distributions of earnings realized from
2008 onwards from H3Cs PRC subsidiaries to our H3C subsidiary in Hong Kong will be subject to this
withholding tax at a rate of 5%. H3Cs main PRC subsidiary generates the cash used to pay principal
and interest on our H3C loan (through dividend flows from the PRC to Hong Kong and then to the
Cayman Islands). Accordingly, we will in the future be required to earn proportionately higher
profits in the PRC to service principal and interest on our loan, or be forced to fund any
deficiencies from cash in our other segments (which do not currently have positive cash flow from
operations).
We are subject to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations and exchange controls and we do not
hedge this risk in China.
Approximately 47 percent of our sales and a portion of our costs are denominated in Renminbi, the
Chinese currency. At the same time, our senior secured bank loan which we intend to service and
repay primarily through cash flow from H3Cs PRC operations is denominated in US dollars. In
July 2005, China uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let it float in a narrow band
against a basket of foreign currencies. The Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate relative to
the U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our cash flows,
revenues, operating results and financial position, and may make it more difficult for us to
service our U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured bank loan. More specifically, if the Renminbi
appreciates in value as compared with the U.S. dollar, our reported revenues will derive a
beneficial increase due to currency translation; and if the Renminbi depreciates, our revenues will
suffer due to such depreciation. This currency translation impacts our expenses as well, but to a
lesser degree.
We do not currently hedge the currency risk in H3C through foreign exchange forward contracts or
otherwise and China employs currency controls restricting Renminbi conversion, limiting our ability
to engage in currency hedging activities in China. Various foreign exchange controls are
applicable to us in China, and such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H3C or us
to repatriate earnings, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and financial
position.
22
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our products contain undetected software or hardware errors, we could incur significant
unexpected expenses and could lose sales.
High technology products sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products
or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. Undetected errors
could result in higher than expected warranty and service costs and expenses, and the recording of
an accrual for related anticipated expenses. From time to time, such errors or component failures
could be found in new or existing products after the commencement of commercial shipments. These
problems may have a material adverse effect on our business by causing us to incur significant
warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our engineering personnel from new product
development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue and causing significant customer relations
problems. Further, if products are not accepted by customers due to such defects, and such returns
exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns based on our historical experience, our operating
results would be adversely affected.
Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when
problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The
occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in
the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to
incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We may need to engage in complex and costly litigation in order to protect, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights; in some jurisdictions, such as China, our rights may not be as strong
as the rights we enjoy in the U.S.
Whether we are defending the assertion of intellectual property rights against us, or asserting our
intellectual property rights against others, intellectual property litigation can be complex,
costly, protracted, and highly disruptive to business operations because it may divert the
attention and energies of management and key technical personnel. Further, plaintiffs in
intellectual property cases often seek injunctive relief and the measures of damages in
intellectual property litigation are complex and often subjective and uncertain. In addition, such
litigation may subject us to counterclaims or other retaliatory actions that could increase its
costs, complexity, uncertainty and disruption to the business. Thus, the existence of this type of
litigation, or any adverse determinations related to such litigation, could subject us to
significant liabilities and costs. Any one of these factors could adversely affect our sales, gross
margin, overall results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in
China, the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still
in the development stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to
enforce our intellectual property rights, and those of H3C, in these jurisdictions.
We may not be able to defend ourselves successfully against claims that we are infringing the
intellectual property rights of others.
Many of our competitors, such as telecommunications, networking, and computer equipment
manufacturers, have large intellectual property portfolios, including patents that may cover
technologies that are relevant to our business. In addition, many smaller companies, universities,
and individual inventors have obtained or applied for patents in areas of technology that may
relate to our business. The industries in which we operate continue to be aggressive in assertion,
licensing, and litigation of patents and other intellectual property rights.
23
In the course of our business, we receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of
potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We
evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in
each case whether to negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary
technologies, protocols, or specifications in our products, and whether we have rights of
indemnification against our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors. If we are unable to obtain
and maintain licenses on favorable terms for intellectual property rights required for the
manufacture, sale, and use of our products, particularly those that must comply with industry
standard protocols and specifications to be commercially viable, our financial position or results
of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are alleged to infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to seek licenses from others or be
prevented from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our
operations or the markets in which we compete. Finally, even if we have indemnification rights in
respect of such allegations of infringement from our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors, we
may not be able to recover our losses under those indemnity rights.
OSN, our open source strategy, subjects us to additional intellectual property risks, such as less
control over development of certain technology that forms a part of this strategy and a higher
likelihood of litigation.
Our Open Services Networking, or OSN, strategy uses open source software, or OSS, licenses. The
underlying source code for OSS is generally made available to the general public with either
relaxed or no intellectual property restrictions. This allows users to create user-generated
software content through either incremental individual effort, or collaboration. The use of OSS
means that for such software we do not exercise control over many aspects of the development of the
open source technology. For example, the vast majority of programmers developing OSS used by us
are neither our employees nor contractors. Therefore, we cannot predict whether further
developments and enhancements to OSS selected by us would be available. Furthermore, rival OSS
applications often compete for market share. Should our choice of application fail to compete
favorably, its OSS development may wane or stop. In addition, OSS has few technological barriers
to entry by new competitors and it may be relatively easy for new competitors, who may have greater
resources than us, to enter our markets and compete with us. Also, because OSS is often compiled
from multiple components developed by numerous independent parties and usually comes as is and
without indemnification, OSS is more vulnerable to third party intellectual property infringement
claims. Finally, some of the more prominent OSS licenses, such as the GNU General Public License,
are the subject of litigation. It is possible that a court could hold such licenses to be
unenforceable or someone could assert a claim for proprietary rights in a program developed and
distributed under them. Any ruling by a court that these licenses are not enforceable or that open
source components of our product offerings may not be liberally copied, modified or distributed may
have the effect of preventing us from selling or developing all or a portion of our products. If
any of the foregoing occurred, it could cause a material adverse impact on our business.
Risks Related to the Trading Market
Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to volatility in the market
price of our stock.
Historically, our stock price has experienced volatility. We expect that our stock price may
continue to experience volatility in the future due to a variety of potential factors such as:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and equivalents and short term investment balances; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on our strategic plan, including, without limitation, any
integration activities we choose to undertake; |
|
|
|
|
variations between our actual financial results and published analysts expectations;
and |
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors or significant customers. |
For example, we experienced a decrease in our stock price around the same time that our proposed
acquisition to be acquired by an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, or
Newco, was terminated. More specifically, on March 20, 2008, an affiliate of Bain Capital
Partners, LLC sent a letter to us purporting to terminate our merger agreement dated September 28,
2007, or the Merger Agreement. We terminated the Merger Agreement, by letters dated April 25, 2008
and April 29, 2008, as a result of Newcos failure to consummate the merger in accordance with the
Merger Agreement. As previously disclosed, we intend to seek payment of the $66 million
termination fee from Newco under the Merger Agreement payable under certain circumstances. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to collect all or any portion of the termination fee, or
that our efforts will not result in adverse consequences to us.
24
In addition, over the past several years, the stock market has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies. These
factors, as well as general economic and political conditions or investors concerns regarding the
credibility of corporate financial statements and the accounting profession, may have a material
adverse affect on the market price of our stock in the future.
We may be required to record additional significant charges to earnings if our goodwill or
intangible assets become impaired, and the recent decline in our stock price heightens this risk.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we review our amortizable
intangible assets and goodwill for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. The
carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable assets may not be recoverable due to factors such as
a decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced estimates of future cash flows and
slower growth rates in our industry or in any of our business units. Estimates of future cash
flows are based on an updated long-term financial outlook of our operations. However, actual
performance in the near-term or long-term could be materially different from these forecasts, which
could impact future estimates. For example, if one of our business units does not meet its
near-term and longer-term forecasts, the goodwill assigned to the business unit could be impaired.
Similarly, a significant decline in our stock price and/or market capitalization may result in
goodwill impairment for one or more business units. We may be required to record a charge to
earnings in our financial statements during a period in which an impairment of our goodwill or
amortizable intangible assets is determined to exist, which may negatively impact our results of
operations. In light of the recent decline in our stock price, the impairment risk described above
is heightened. For example, in the three-month period ended May 30, 2008, we took a charge of
$158.0 million relating to impairment of the goodwill of our TippingPoint segment.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We lease properties in the United States and a number of foreign countries. For information
regarding property, plant and equipment by geographic region for each of the last two fiscal years,
see Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes our significant leased real estate properties as of May 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Sq. Ft. |
|
Owned/Leased |
|
Primary Use |
United StatesBoston Area
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Corporate
headquarters; DVBU
office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
United StatesAustin Area
|
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
TippingPoints main
office, research
and development,
and customer
service. |
EuropeU.K.
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
Corporate and DVBU
offices; DVBU
research and
development, and
customer service. |
ChinaHangzhou
|
|
|
1,682,000 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
H3C office,
research and
development,
manufacturing,
sales, and
training. Lease
expires January
2009 (under
negotiation for
renewal). |
ChinaBeijing
|
|
|
508,412 |
|
|
Leased
|
|
H3C research and
development,
training, sales and
customer service. |
As part of our initiatives to maximize our efficiency, we are consolidating our operations wherever
feasible and are actively engaged in efforts to dispose of excess facilities. As of May 30, 2008,
we lease and sublease to third-party tenants approximately 2,850 square feet in one of our North
America leased locations under a sub-lease that expires in 2010.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our present needs in all material respects.
25
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The material set forth in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of
Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) |
|
On March 21, 2008, the Company held a Special Meeting of Stockholders
to vote on (1) a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the Merger Agreement), dated as of September 28, 2007, by and among
the Company, Diamond II Holdings, Inc. and Diamond II Acquisition
Corp. and (2) a proposal to adjourn or postpone the special meeting,
if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there
are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the
Merger Agreement. |
|
(b) |
|
There were 402,388,726 shares eligible to vote as of the record date.
A quorum was present. Both proposals were approved. The following
are the voting results of the proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
Adoption of Merger Agreement |
|
|
281,553,408 |
|
|
|
7,536,916 |
|
|
|
4,206,408 |
|
Adjournment or postponement, if necessary |
|
|
273,101,179 |
|
|
|
19,775,283 |
|
|
|
420,271 |
|
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol COMS and has been
traded on NASDAQ since our initial public offering on March 21, 1984. The following table sets
forth the high and low sale prices as reported on NASDAQ during the last two fiscal years. As of
July 18, 2008, we had approximately 4,459 stockholders of record. We have not paid, and do not
anticipate that we will pay, cash dividends on our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
4.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.24 |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock, including shares returned to satisfy
tax withholding obligations, in the quarter ended May 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
March 1, 2008 through March 28, 2008 |
|
|
239,235 |
(1) |
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
March 29, 2008 through April 25, 2008 |
|
|
50,743 |
(1) |
|
|
2.46 |
|
April 26, 2008 through May 30, 2008 |
|
|
59,248 |
(1) |
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
349,226 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon
the vesting of restricted stock awards. |
26
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RETURN
Set forth on the next page is a line graph comparing the cumulative total return of our common
stock with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index, our New Peer Group
(1) and our Old Peer Group (1) for the period commencing on May 30, 2003 and ending on May 30, 2008
(fiscal year end)(2)(3). We historically have constructed our peer group based on comparable
market offerings, revenue composition and size. In re-evaluating our peer group this year, we
removed one peer that is no longer publicly-traded. We also added five new peers; in light of the
evolving nature of our business, we believe these additions to the peer group provide a more
meaningful comparison in terms of competition in several of our important product offerings. This
information shall not be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall
not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, unless we specifically incorporate it by
reference.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN *
Among 3Com Corporation, The S&P 500 Index,
A New Peer Group And An Old Peer Group
|
|
|
* |
|
$ 100 invested on 5/30/03 in stock or index-including
reinvestment of dividends.
|
|
|
|
Index calculated on month-end basis. |
|
|
|
Copyright © 2008, Standard & Poors. a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
wwwresearchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/30/03 |
|
5/28/04 |
|
6/3/05 |
|
6/2/06 |
|
6/1/07 |
|
5/30/08 |
|
3Com Corporation |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
131.77 |
|
|
|
72.10 |
|
|
|
96.95 |
|
|
|
95.52 |
|
|
|
51.32 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
118.33 |
|
|
|
128.07 |
|
|
|
139.14 |
|
|
|
170.85 |
|
|
|
159.41 |
|
New Peer Group |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
128.34 |
|
|
|
117.83 |
|
|
|
137.10 |
|
|
|
182.20 |
|
|
|
171.17 |
|
Old Peer Group |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
135.18 |
|
|
|
119.23 |
|
|
|
125.25 |
|
|
|
165.16 |
|
|
|
163.31 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our New Peer Group consists of Alcatel Lucent, Cisco Systems Inc., D-Link Corporation, Extreme
Networks, Inc., Foundry Networks, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, McAfee, Inc., Netgear Inc., Nortel
Networks Limited and Sourcefire, Inc. Our Old Peer Group consists of Cisco Systems, Inc., Extreme
Networks, Inc., Foundry Networks, Inc., McAfee, Inc. and Netgear Inc. Avaya, Inc was acquired and
has therefore been removed from the Peer Groups. |
27
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Assumes that $100.00 was invested on May 30, 2003 in our common stock and each index, and that
all dividends were reinvested. No cash dividends have been declared on our common stock.
Stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future
stockholder returns. |
|
(3) |
|
3Com uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31. |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and our consolidated financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our fiscal
year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2008 consists of the 52 weeks ended May 30, 2008.
Fiscal year 2007 consists of the 52 weeks ended June 1, 2007. Fiscal 2006 consisted of 52 weeks
and ended on June 3, 2006. Fiscal year 2005 consisted of 53 weeks and ended on June 2, 2005. Fiscal
year 2004 consisted of 52 weeks ended on June 3, 2004. For convenience, the consolidated financial
statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month. The following balance
sheet data and statements of operations data for each of the five years ended May 31, 2008 were
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Consolidated balance sheets as of May
31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended May 31, 2008 and notes thereto appear elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
During our fiscal 2006 we acquired a majority ownership of our then H3C joint-venture. Effective
with the acquisition we began consolidating H3Cs results on a 2 month lag as H3C follows a
calendar year end. We reflected a minority interest on the balance sheet and in the statement of
operations for Huaweis remaining interest. On March 29, 2007 we acquired Huaweis remaining
interest and therefore the minority interest was eliminated and no minority interest in our
subsidiaries assets exists as of May 30, 2008.
Our acquisition of TippingPoint on January 31, 2005 was accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the assets purchased and liabilities assumed are included in the consolidated balance
sheet as of May 31, 2005. The operating results of TippingPoint are included in the consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition. Accordingly, fiscal 2006 and beyond contain
full years of TippingPoints results compared to five months of results in fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year May 31, |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Sales |
|
$ |
1,294,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,481 |
|
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
$ |
651,244 |
|
|
$ |
698,884 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(228,841 |
) |
|
|
(88,589 |
) |
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
(349,263 |
) |
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(228,841 |
) |
|
|
(88,589 |
) |
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
(195,686 |
) |
|
|
(346,863 |
) |
Loss per share from continuing
operations Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of May 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash, equivalents and short-term investments |
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
|
$ |
864,347 |
|
|
$ |
844,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,383,356 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,775,130 |
|
|
|
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
1,861,361 |
|
|
|
1,592,967 |
|
|
|
1,820,818 |
|
Working capital (1) |
|
|
305,444 |
|
|
|
257,614 |
|
|
|
778,064 |
|
|
|
667,949 |
|
|
|
1,213,108 |
|
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations |
|
|
22,367 |
|
|
|
23,725 |
|
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
8,484 |
|
|
|
15,135 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
253,000 |
|
|
|
336,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,405,247 |
) |
|
|
(1,176,406 |
) |
|
|
(1,087,512 |
) |
|
|
(967,952 |
) |
|
|
(755,244 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
995,302 |
|
|
|
1,151,299 |
|
|
|
1,202,362 |
|
|
|
1,274,923 |
|
|
|
1,499,114 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Working capital is defined as total current assets less total current liabilities. |
28
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and notes thereto included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We are incorporated in Delaware. A pioneer in the computer networking industry, we provide secure,
converged networking solutions, as well as maintenance and support services, for enterprises and
public sector organizations of all sizes.
We design and market our offerings to enterprises that vary in size from small business to large
multi-national entities. These organizations range across a number of vertical industries,
including education, finance, government, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing and real estate. We
offer our customers solutions for mission-critical network environments on an open platform design.
We believe that open platform technology offers our customers a more versatile solution for an
environment of increasing use of applications over network infrastructures. We further believe it
offers a more cost-effective solution as it works in multi-vendor environments on a non-proprietary
basis. Our open platform technology is designed into our switch and router products as well as the
applications which interface with our offerings to directly deliver applications over networking
capability. We believe that our customers benefit from the flexibility to interface best-in-class
applications with our products and we therefore actively develop partnerships to deliver this
value.
We focus on delivering superior networking solutions that offer cost a cost advantage to our
customers to own and operate. Our products are designed to provide superior value through
capability design as well as other cost conscious features such as lower power requirements, and
inter-operability in multi-vendor networks.
We believe that our global presence, brand identity, strong development organization and
intellectual property portfolio provide a solid foundation for achieving our objectives.
Our products are sold on a worldwide basis through a combination of value added partners and direct
sales representatives. We also work with service providers to deliver managed networking solutions
for enterprise customers.
Headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts, we have worldwide operations, including sales,
marketing, research and development, and customer service and support capabilities.
Our products and services can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security; |
|
|
§ |
|
Voice; |
|
|
§ |
|
Services; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Legacy Connectivity Products. |
29
We have undergone significant changes in recent years, including:
|
§ |
|
Significant changes to our executive leadership; |
|
|
§ |
|
the formation and subsequent 100 percent acquisition of our China-based H3C subsidiary; |
|
|
§ |
|
financing a portion of the purchase price for our acquisition of H3C by entering into
a $430 million senior secured credit agreement ; |
|
|
§ |
|
acquiring TippingPoint Technologies, Inc; |
|
|
§ |
|
restructuring activities, which included outsourcing of information technology, all
manufacturing activity in our DVBU segment, significant headcount reductions in other
functions, and selling excess facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain
Capital Partners; and |
|
|
§ |
|
changing our reporting segments to align with the way we manage our business. |
We believe an overview of some of these significant recent events is helpful to gain a clearer
understanding of our operating results.
Significant Events
H3C
On November 17, 2003, we formed H3C, formerly known as the Huawei-3Com joint venture, with a
subsidiary of Huawei Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei). H3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and has its
principal operating center in Hangzhou, China. Two years after formation of H3C, we entered into an
agreement to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest in H3C from Huawei for an
aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million. The acquisition occurred on January 27, 2006 at which
time we owned a majority interest in the joint venture and, therefore, consolidated H3Cs financial
statements (beginning February 1, 2006). On March 29, 2007, 3Com paid $882 million to purchase
Huaweis remaining interest in H3C. We financed a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition
of Huaweis 49 percent ownership in H3C through a $430 million senior secured credit agreement with
several lenders. As such, H3C was a wholly owned subsidiary for 2008 as compared to the previous
year when we owned 51 percent and Huawei had a minority ownership.
New Products
We have introduced multiple new products targeted at the small, medium and large enterprise
markets, including modular and multi-service switches and routers; converged IP solutions such as
voice, video and surveillance; security; and unified switching solutions. We have also announced
our Open Services Networking, or OSN, strategy which provides customers with options to integrate
best-of-breed application solutions directly into their networks.
Business Environment and Future Trends
Networking industry analysts and participants differ widely in their assessments concerning the
prospects for near-term industry growth, especially in light of the current weakness in many of the
major global economies. Industry factors and trends also present significant challenges in the
medium-term with respect to our goals for sales growth, profitability and the generation of
increased cash flow from operations. Such factors and trends include:
|
§ |
|
Intense competition in the market for higher end, enterprise core routing and switching products; |
|
|
§ |
|
Aggressive product pricing by competitors targeted at gaining share in market segments where we
have had a strong position historically, such as the small to medium-sized enterprise market;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
The advanced nature and ready availability of merchant silicon, which allows low-end competitors
to deliver competitive products and makes it increasingly difficult for us to differentiate our
products. |
We believe that long-term success in this environment requires us to be a global technology leader,
increase our revenue and take market share from competitors. We believe that our differentiated
product portfolio which offers end-to-end IP solutions based on open standards offers a compelling
value proposition for customers. Our intention is to leverage our global footprint to more
effectively sell these products.
30
We hope to achieve our goal of revenue growth by executing on three region-centric growth
strategies as follows:
|
|
|
China - In China, we have been successful in direct-touch sales to enterprise customers
and selling our offerings to the carrier market through our Huawei OEM relationship. With
the end of our joint-venture with Huawei we expect declining sales to Huawei, although we
anticipate they will remain a strategic partner for sales into the carrier market. To
maintain our market-leadership position in China we intend to increase our focus on
direct-touch sales as well as pursue other channels into the carrier market. We believe
that growing market share in China will be more challenging than in the past given that we
already have a significant enterprise networking market share in China. |
|
|
|
|
Emerging markets outside of China - We expect to target growth opportunities outside of
China in other developing markets. We believe that our successful penetration of the
Chinese market has positioned us to grow sales in developing markets generally. |
|
|
|
|
Developed global markets - Our ability to achieve our goal of sales growth in
developed markets depends to a substantial degree on our ability to take market share from
our competitors. Our strategy in developed markets centers around leveraging targeted
selling and marketing investments into the small (and increasingly the medium) business
segment of the enterprise networking market. These sales efforts are currently expected to
focus on our open source, open architecture platforms, and our comprehensive portfolio of
differentiated networking offerings. |
Finally, we believe that our success is dependent on our ability to increase our overall margins
and cash generation. We believe that by accelerating the integration of our worldwide operations
we can achieve further operational efficiencies which will allow us to support our continued
investment in sales and marketing. We may require certain targeted investments in the integration
of our business infrastructure designed to drive more profitable near and long-term growth.
For our TippingPoint business we plan to focus on growing its top line and improving operational
efficiency and segment profitability. In addition, our current goal is to maximize TippingPoints
value and continue it on its path to greater operational autonomy.
Termination of Proposed Acquisition of the Company
On September 28, 2007, we announced an agreement to be acquired by an entity controlled by
affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, or Newco. On March 20, 2008, an affiliate of Bain Capital
Partners, LLC sent a letter to us purporting to terminate our merger agreement dated September 28,
2007, or the Merger Agreement. We terminated the Merger Agreement, by letters dated April 25, 2008
and April 29, 2008, as a result of Newcos failure to consummate the merger in accordance with the
Merger Agreement. As previously disclosed, we intend to seek payment of the $66 million
termination fee from Newco under the Merger Agreement payable under certain circumstances, although
we cannot assure you that we will be able to collect all or any portion of the termination fee.
Segment Reporting
Based on the information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of
making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance, we review the operations of
the business by looking at four reporting segments. In prior fiscal years we reported two segments,
SCN and H3C. In fiscal 2008, we have realigned our internal reporting and, as a result, we have
changed our segment reporting to be in line with the way we are now internally managing our
business. This change breaks-out the SCN segment into the Data and Voice business unit (DVBU),
our TippingPoint security division (TippingPoint) and corporate expenses (Corporate).
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2008 consisted of 52 weeks and ended
on May 30, 2008. Fiscal year 2007, consisted of 52 weeks ended on June 1, 2007, and fiscal year
2006 consisted of 52 weeks and ended on June 2, 2006. For convenience, the consolidated financial
statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month.
31
During fiscal 2006 we purchased an additional two percent ownership interest in H3C, giving us a 51
percent ownership interest. We determined it was then appropriate to consolidate H3Cs financial
statements. From that time until we became a 100 percent owner, as discussed below, we also
recorded Huaweis proportionate share of the income of H3C as a minority interest in the income of
consolidated joint venture. Prior to the additional 2 percent acquisition we accounted for our
investment in H3C by the equity method. Under this method, we recorded our proportionate share of
H3Cs net income or loss based on the most recently available quarterly financial statements of H3C
under the caption Equity interest in income of unconsolidated joint venture in our consolidated
financial statements.
Both joint venture partners subsequently had the right to offer to buy the others remaining
ownership in H3C. Our 3Com Technologies subsidiary completed the purchase of Huaweis remaining
interest in H3C for $882 million in March 2007. Huawei-3Com Co., Limited is now known as H3C
Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C.
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
original credit agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term
loan to finance a portion of the purchase price for 3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C
discussed above.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, which appear in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of those
accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
by us. The following items require the most significant judgment and often involve complex
estimation:
Revenue recognition: We recognize a sale when the product has been delivered and risk of loss has
passed to the customer, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, and the fee is fixed or determinable. The assessment of whether
the fee is fixed or determinable considers whether a significant portion of the fee is due after
our normal payment terms. If we determine that the fee is not fixed or determinable, we recognize
revenue at the time the fee becomes due, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have
been met. Also, sales arrangements may contain customer-specific acceptance requirements for both
products and services. In such cases, revenue is deferred at the time of delivery of the product or
service and is recognized upon receipt of customer acceptance.
For arrangements that involve multiple elements that are not considered software arrangements, such
as sales of hardware products that include maintenance or installation services, revenue is
allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue
recognition criteria for each element have been met. We use the residual method to recognize
revenue when an arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and
objective evidence of the fair value of all the undelivered elements exists. Under the residual
method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the
arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. If evidence of fair value of one or more undelivered
elements does not exist, revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs
or when fair value can be established.
We assess collectability based on a number of factors, including general economic and market
conditions, past transaction history with the customer, and the creditworthiness of the customer.
If we determine that collection of the fee is not reasonably assured, then we defer the fee and
recognize revenue upon receipt of payment. We do not typically request collateral from our
customers. In the H3C segment, certain customers pay accounts receivable with notes receivable
from Chinese banks with maturities less than six months. These are also referred to as bankers
acceptances.
A significant portion of our sales is made to distributors and value added resellers (VARs).
Revenue is generally recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, assuming all
other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Sales to these customers are recorded net of
appropriate allowances, including estimates for product returns, price protection, and excess
channel inventory levels. We maintain reserves for potential allowances and adjustments; if the
actual level of returns and adjustments differ from the assumptions we use to develop those
reserves, additional allowances and charges might be required.
32
For sales of products that contain software that is marketed separately, we apply the provisions of
AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. We generally sell our
software products with maintenance services, which includes the rights to updates and enhancements,
and, in some cases, also with consulting services. For these undelivered elements, we determine
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value to be the price charged when the
undelivered element is sold separately. We determine VSOE for maintenance sold in connection with
product based on the amount that will be separately charged for the maintenance renewal period. We
determine VSOE for consulting services by reference to the amount charged for similar engagements
when a software license sale is not involved.
We recognize revenue from software licenses sold together with maintenance and/or consulting
services upon shipment using the residual method, provided that the above criteria have been met.
Under the residual method, revenue associated with undelivered elements is deferred based on VSOE,
and any remaining amounts are considered related to the delivered elements and recognized providing
all other revenue recognition criteria are met. If VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements
cannot be established, we defer all revenue from the arrangement until the earlier of the point at
which such sufficient VSOE does exist or all elements of the arrangement have been delivered.
We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the applicable agreement. Sales of
services, including professional services, system integration, project management, and training,
are recognized upon delivery of the service.
Royalty
revenue is generally recognized when any performance by 3Com is
complete and payment has been received.
Allowance for doubtful accounts: We monitor payments from our customers on an on-going basis and
maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our
customers to make required payments. When we evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for doubtful
accounts, we take into account various factors including our accounts receivable aging, customer
creditworthiness, historical bad debts, and geographic and political risk. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances might be required.
Inventories: Inventory is stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates cost, or net
realizable value. We perform detailed reviews related to the net realizable value of inventory on
an ongoing basis, for both inventory on hand and inventory that we are committed to purchase,
giving consideration to deterioration, obsolescence, and other factors. If actual market conditions
differ from those projected by management and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, additional
write-downs or adjustments to cost of sales might be required; alternatively, we might realize
benefits through cost of sales for sale or disposition of inventory that had been previously
written off.
Goodwill and intangible assets: Carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives are reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting
literature. We test our goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and in
interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of goodwill may be
impaired. We review the value of our intangible assets in accordance with the applicable accounting
literature for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets
are no longer appropriate. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 we conducted an additional
impairment test of our goodwill and intangible assets due to the decline of our stock price which
resulted in a $158.0 million impairment charge to our TippingPoint goodwill as discussed in Note 9.
As of May 31, 2008, we had $609.3 million of goodwill and $278.4 million of net intangible assets
remaining on our balance sheet, which we currently believe to be realizable based on the estimated
fair value of these assets. We estimate the fair value of goodwill using third-party valuation
reports and the fair value of our intangible assets using estimated future cash flows of the
associated products and technology. It is possible that the estimates and assumptions used in
assessing the carrying value of these assets, such as future sales and expense levels, may need to
be re-evaluated in the case of continued market deterioration, which could result in further
impairment of these assets.
33
Equity securities and other investments: We account for non-marketable equity securities and other
investments at historical cost or, if we have the ability to exert significant influence over the
investee, by the equity method. Investments accounted for by the equity method include investments
in limited partnership venture capital funds and, prior to the acquisition of majority ownership on
January 27, 2006, the investment in H3C. In accounting for these investments by the equity method,
we record our proportionate share of the funds net income or loss, or H3Cs net income or loss,
based on the most recently available quarterly financial statements. Since H3C has adopted a
calendar year basis of reporting, we reported our equity in H3Cs net income or loss based on H3Cs
most recent quarterly financial statements, two months in arrears. For the year ended May 31, 2006
we accounted for H3C under the equity method for ten months of the year. At May 31, 2008 we no
longer held any equity securities.
Stock-based Compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS No. 123(R), which requires all stock-based compensation to employees (as defined in
SFAS No. 123(R)), including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock awards, and
restricted stock units, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.
Estimates of the fair value of equity awards in future periods will be affected by the market price
of our common stock, as well as the actual results of certain assumptions used to value the equity
awards. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the expected volatility of the common
stock, the expected term of options granted, and the risk free interest rate.
The fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares is determined by using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and applying the single-option approach to the stock option
valuation. The options generally have vesting on an annual basis over a vesting period of four
years. We estimate the expected option term by analyzing the historical term period from grant to
exercise and also considers the expected term for those options that are outstanding. The expected
term of employee stock purchase plan shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under
each offering period. The volatility of the common stock is estimated using historical volatility.
The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model is determined by looking
at historical U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond issues with terms corresponding to the expected terms
of the equity awards. In addition, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option
valuation model, because we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Lastly, in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of
grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. In order to determine an estimated pre-vesting option forfeiture rate, we analyzed
historical forfeiture data, which yielded a current forfeiture rate of 27 percent as of the end of
the current fiscal year. We believe this historical forfeiture rate to be reflective of our
anticipated rate on a go-forward basis. An estimated forfeiture rate has been applied to all
unvested options and restricted stock outstanding as of June 1, 2006 and to all options and
restricted stock granted since June 1, 2006. Therefore, stock-based compensation expense is
recorded only for those options and restricted stock that are expected to vest.
Restructuring charges: Over the last several years we have undertaken significant restructuring
initiatives. These initiatives have required us to record restructuring charges related to
severance and outplacement costs, lease cancellations, accelerated depreciation and write-downs of
held for sale properties, write-downs of other long-term assets, and other restructuring costs.
Given the significance of our restructuring activities and the time required for execution and
completion of such activities, the process of estimating restructuring charges is complex and
involves periodic reassessments of estimates made at the time the original decisions were made. The
accounting for restructuring costs and asset impairments requires us to record charges when we have
taken actions or have the appropriate approval for taking action, and when a liability is incurred.
Our policies require us to periodically evaluate the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under
our restructuring initiatives. As we continue to evaluate the business, we might be required to
record additional charges for new restructuring activities as well as changes in estimates to
amounts previously recorded.
Product Warranty: A limited warranty is provided on most of our products for periods ranging from
90 days to limited lifetime, depending upon the product, and allowances for estimated warranty
costs are recorded during the period of sale. The determination of such allowances requires us to
make estimates of product return rates and expected costs to repair or replace the products under
warranty. If actual return rates and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our
estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales might be required.
34
Income taxes: We are subject to income tax in a number of jurisdictions. A certain degree of
estimation is required in recording the assets and liabilities related to income taxes, and it is
reasonably possible those such assets may not be recovered and that such liabilities may not be
paid or that payments in excess of amounts initially estimated and accrued may be required. We
assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from our future taxable income
and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. We
consider historical taxable income, estimates of future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and
feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance. Based on
various factors, including our recent losses, retained deficit, operating performance in fiscal
2008, and estimates of future profitability, we have concluded that future taxable income will,
more likely than not, be insufficient to recover most of net deferred tax assets as of May 31,
2008. Accordingly, we have established an appropriate valuation allowance to offset such deferred
tax assets.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. We adopted FIN 48 on June 2, 2007, which resulted in no adjustment to
the opening balance of retained earnings. As of May 31, 2008 the Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of $18.2 million including
interest, if recognized, all of which would affect our
effective tax rate.
We recognize tax liabilities for uncertain items in accordance with FIN 48 and we adjust these
liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not
previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate
resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the
tax liabilities.
We recognize interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax
expense line in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of May 30, 2008, the
amount of interest included in unrecognized tax benefits was
$2.5 million, representing an increase of $0.4 million
from the date of adoption. There were no penalties accrued in all
periods presented.
We have
net operating loss carryforwards related to the following income tax
jurisdictions and expiration periods: U.S. federal loss
carryforwards of approximately $2.6 billion expiring between
fiscal years 2009 and 2028, substantially all of which expire between
fiscal years 2021 and 2028; various state loss carryforwards of
approximately $1.2 billion expiring between 2009 and 2028; and
various foreign loss carryforwards of $2.9 million expiring
between 2014 and 2018, and $319.0 million with an unlimited
carryforward period.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2008, 2007, AND 2006
In prior fiscal years we reported two segments, SCN and H3C. In fiscal 2008, we have realigned our
internal reporting and, as a result, we have changed our segment reporting, to four reporting
segments, to be in line with the way we are now internally managing our business. This change
breaks-out the SCN segment into the Data and Voice business unit (DVBU), our TippingPoint
security division (TippingPoint) and corporate expenses (Corporate). We do not use any
allocation methods to distribute these corporate expenses to our operating business units.
35
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, the percentage of total sales
represented by the line items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
Gain on investments, net |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before income taxes, equity interest in
income of unconsolidated joint venture and minority interest
in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
Equity interest in income of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(17.7 |
)% |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of fiscal 2008 and 2007
During the year ended May 30, 2008 we continued to experience increased performance in our H3C and
TippingPoint segments offset by declines in our DVBU segment and we continued to reduce operating
expenses in our DVBU business segment, offset in part by investment in DVBU services.
Sales
The following table shows our sales from products categories in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total sales for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
1,058.5 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,028.1 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
Security |
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
120.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Voice |
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Services |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Legacy connectivity products |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,294.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networking revenue includes sales of our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable 10/100/1000 managed
switching lines, our modular switching lines, routers, IP storage and our small to medium-sized
enterprise market products. Sales of our networking products in fiscal 2008 increased $30.4
million, or 3 percent, from fiscal 2007. The increase in sales was primarily driven by expansion
in our global sales of H3C-developed products, an appreciation on the Renminbi related to our sales
in China, partially offset by reduced sales to Huawei and slower than expected sales in our North
America region.
36
Security revenue includes our TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security
products, such as our embedded firewall, or EFW and virtual private network, or VPN, products.
Sales of our security products in fiscal 2008 increased $13.3 million, or 11 percent, from fiscal
2007. The increase is primarily attributable to increased sales of our TippingPoint products in our
North America region due to certain significant customers wins and slightly increased sales on a
global basis.
Voice revenue includes our VCX and NBX® voice-over-internet protocol, or VoIP, product lines, as
well as voice gateway offerings. Sales of our VoIP telephony products in fiscal 2008 decreased
$7.3 million, or 11 percent, from fiscal 2007 due primarily to decreased sales in North America.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security revenue. Services revenue in fiscal 2008 increased $3.7
million, or 10 percent, from fiscal 2007. The increase was driven primarily by increased service
sales tied to growth in networking.
Legacy connectivity products revenue includes our legacy network interface card, personal computer
card, and mini-peripheral component interconnect offerings. At the end of fiscal 2008 sales of
these products are negligible with continued revenue only expected to be from royalty arrangements.
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
China |
|
$ |
609.5 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
$ |
587.1 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
% |
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
292.4 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
272.8 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
North America |
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
233.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Asia Pacific excluding China |
|
|
106.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,294.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography to the extent available is reported based on the customers
designated delivery point, except in the case of H3Cs OEM sales which are based on the hub
locations of H3Cs OEM partners.
Sales in our China region in fiscal 2008 increased $22.4 million, or 4 percent, from fiscal 2007.
This increase is primarily due to the appreciation of the Renminbi as well as increased direct
touch China sales, partially offset by decreased sales to Huawei.
Sales in our Europe, Middle East, and Africa region in fiscal 2008 increased $19.6 million, or 7
percent, from fiscal 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to increased effectiveness of
market penetration in this region, especially in networking and security products.
Sales in our North America region in fiscal 2008 decreased $31.5 million, or 13 percent, from
fiscal 2007. This decrease is primarily due to weakness in sales of our voice solutions and an
economic slowdown as well as perceived apprehension in the market related to the now-terminated
proposed acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain Capital, partially offset by increased
sales of our TippingPoint products in our North America region due to demand for security solutions
including several large customer wins.
Sales in our Asia Pacific region excluding China in fiscal 2008 increased $3.3 million, or 3
percent, from fiscal 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to increased effectiveness of
market penetration in this region, especially in networking products.
Sales in our Latin and South America region in fiscal 2008 increased $13.6 million, or 19 percent,
from fiscal 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to increased effectiveness of market
penetration in this region, especially in networking products.
37
Gross Margin
Gross margin by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
H3C |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
DVBU |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
Intercompany eliminations and other |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
50.5 |
% |
|
|
45.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin in our H3C segment improved 7.9 points to 55.1 percent in fiscal 2008 from 47.2
percent in fiscal 2007. The improvement in gross profit margin is driven by favorable product mix,
improved pricing of products and reduced costs of products.
Gross margin in our DVBU segment decreased 1.6 points to 31.3 percent in fiscal 2008 from 32.9
percent in the previous fiscal year. The decline is primarily explained by costs associated with
our change from an outsourced service provider to a hybrid of
outsourced and in-house performance of
services to our customers and increased inter-company pricing, offset in part by product cost
reductions.
Gross margin in our TippingPoint segment improved 0.5 points to 67.4 percent in fiscal 2008 from
66.9 percent in the previous fiscal year. This increase is primarily due to more favorable product
mix of sales in the current fiscal year, offset in part by certain cost increases.
Gross margin related to intercompany eliminations and other increased 2.2 points to 10.2 percent in
fiscal 2008 from 8.0 percent in the previous fiscal year. This category contains our intercompany
eliminations and other items, which includes mainly the amortization of the purchase accounting
step-up in inventory from our acquisition of the remaining 49 percent of H3C. The effect of the
purchase accounting amortization was included in the first six months of our fiscal 2008, but was
not present in the last six months or any of the prior-year periods presented.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses in fiscal 2008 were $917.9 million, compared to $711.0 million in fiscal 2007, a
net increase of $206.9 million, or 29 percent. The increase primarily relates to a $158.0 million
goodwill impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 as well as increased
amortization costs of $61.1 million due to a full year of amortization expense in current fiscal
period as opposed to one day of amortization expense related to the 49 percent purchase of H3C in
the prior fiscal year and to a lesser extent costs related to the now-terminated proposed
acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain Capital of $10.6 million, a law firm success fee
of $9.0 million related to the jury verdict in our Realtek litigation (a dispute which we resolved favorably through an agreement with
Realtek to provide it with nonexclusive licenses in exchange for
$70 million of license fees
expected to be paid in the first quarter), a $4.9 million charge related to
expenses incurred in connection with TippingPoints then-proposed IPO, and $5.1 million of
increased FAS123R expenses. These expenses were partially offset by the absence of a
change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program, which contributed compensation expenses of
$51.5 million in the year ended May 31, 2007 as well as in-process research and development
expenses of $35.8 million in the year ended May 31, 2007.
As a percent of sales, total operating expenses in fiscal 2008 were 70.8 percent, compared to 56.1
percent in fiscal 2007. In aggregate, sales and marketing, research and development, and general
and administrative expenses were 50.3 percent of sales in fiscal 2008, compared to 49.6 percent in
fiscal 2007, an increase of $22.6 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. We believe that
to a significant degree, these expenses are controllable and discretionary over time, but they are
not directly variable with sales levels within a particular period. The most significant component
of the increase of $22.6 million was the incurrence of deal related costs of $10.6 million related
to the now terminated proposed acquisition of the Company, a law firm success fee of $9.0 million
related to the jury verdict in our Realtek litigation, increased FAS 123R expenses of $5.1 million, TippingPoint
IPO related costs of $4.9 million and increased spending in all areas partially offset by the
absence of change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program, which contributed compensation
expenses of $51.5 million in the year ended May 31, 2007.
38
A more detailed discussion of the factors affecting each major component of total operating
expenses is provided below.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2008 decreased $3.7 million compared
to fiscal 2007. This decrease was due primarily to a $7.0 million decrease in H3C sales and
marketing expenses partially offset by increased sales and marketing expenses in DVBU and
TippingPoint. The $7.0 million decrease in H3C primarily relates to the absence of the
change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program of $17.7 million in the prior fiscal period
partially offset by investments in the H3C direct touch sales force.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses in fiscal 2008 decreased $9.0 million
compared to fiscal 2007. This decrease was due primarily to decreased spending in DVBU and
TippingPoint partially offset by increased spending in our H3C segment. The decrease in the DVBU
segment of $10.2 million primarily relates to integration of research and development activities
formerly handled by DVBU into our H3C segment. The increase of $4.3 million in our H3C segment was
due to these activities and increased investment in research and development, offset in part by the
absence of the change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program of $27.2 million in the prior
fiscal period . The TippingPoint segment decreased $3.0 million from the prior fiscal year due to
constricted spending.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2008 increased $35.2
million from fiscal 2007. This increase is primarily due to the incurrence of deal related costs
of $10.6 million related to the now terminated proposed acquisition of the Company, a law firm
success fee of $9.0 million related to the jury verdict in our Realtek litigation (a dispute which we resolved favorably through an
agreement with Realtek to provide it with nonexclusive licenses in exchange for $70 million of license fees expected to be
paid in the first quarter), a $4.9 million charge related
to TippingPoint IPO related costs, and $5.0 million of increased FAS123R expenses partially offset
by the absence of the change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program of $6.6 million in the
year ended May 31, 2007.
Amortization. Amortization was $103.7 million in fiscal 2008 and $42.5 million in fiscal 2007, an
increase of $61.2 million. Amortization increased due primarily to the inclusion of H3C
amortization expenses for the entire fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. The fiscal 2007 amortization
expense related to the March 29, 2007 purchase of 49 percent of H3C in 2007 was through March 31,
2007 as we record H3C results on a two month lag.
In-process research and development. In fiscal 2007 $34.0 million of the total purchase price of
our acquisition of Huaweis remaining minority interest in H3C was allocated to in-process research
and development and was expensed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Projects that qualify as
in-process research and development represent those that have not yet reached technological
feasibility and which have no alternative future use. At the time of acquisition, H3C had multiple
in-process research and development efforts under way for certain current and future product lines.
We had no in-process research and development charges in fiscal 2008.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges were $4.5 million in fiscal 2008 and $3.5 million in
fiscal 2007. Restructuring charges in fiscal 2008 and 2007 were the result of reductions in
workforce and continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. Further actions
may be taken if our business activity declines or additional cost reduction efforts are necessary.
Gain on Investments, Net
During fiscal 2008, net gains of investments of $0.5 million were due primarily to gains from the
Companys remaining investment portfolio of equity securities that were sold in the first quarter.
During fiscal 2007, net gains on investments were $1.1 million, primarily reflecting gains from
sales of certain equity securities.
Interest (Expense) Income and Other Income, Net
Interest (expense) income and other income, net, was $31.3 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease of
$47.9 million compared to $79.2 million in fiscal 2007. The primary reason for the decrease was
net interest expense in fiscal 2008 of $13.1 million compared to interest income of $40.9 million
in fiscal 2007. The net change in interest expense relates to the interest expense from the $430
million of debt incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, as well as decreased interest income
from our reduced cash balance in the current fiscal year. Partially offsetting the increase in
interest expense was an increase of $13.9 million of other income from H3C for an operating
subsidy program by the Chinese VAT authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT taxes
collected by H3C from purchasers of software products.
39
Income Tax Benefit (Provision)
We had an income tax benefit of $2.9 million in fiscal 2008 compared to an income tax provision of
$10.2 million in fiscal 2007. The income tax benefit for fiscal 2008 was primarily the result of
the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits of $13.2 million as a result of the
effective settlement of certain foreign examinations. This benefit was partially offset by the
revaluation in the third quarter of our deferred assets and liabilities relating to our H3C
subsidiary in China. The net effect of these revaluations was an increase in our tax provision for
fiscal 2008 of $6.1 million. Under the new PRC tax law, effective January 1, 2008, companies which
qualify as new and high technology companies will pay corporate income tax at a reduced rate of
15%. Based on the draft regulations, we believe that our H3C subsidiary in China will qualify for
this reduced rate. However, the final regulations and the detailed application process have not
yet been announced. Even though we expect our long-term income tax rate in China to be 15%,
accounting rules require us to revalue our deferred tax balances to the enacted statutory rates
until such time as we qualify for the reduced rate. This is discussed further in Risk Factors
above. The balance of the net benefit for the year was the result of providing for taxes in
certain foreign jurisdictions. Notwithstanding the issue discussed above, our H3C subsidiary in
China is currently entitled to tax concessions which began in 2004 and exempted it from the PRC
income tax for its initial two years and entitle it to a 50 percent reduction in income tax in the
following three years. 2008 will be the final year of those tax concessions. Consequently, until
such time as we receive approval for the reduced long-term rate of 15 percent, we currently expect
the H3C statutory rate in China to be 9 percent for the calendar year 2008, and, on the expectation
that we qualify for the reduced rate, 15 percent thereafter. If we do not qualify for the reduced
rate, the statutory income tax rate in China will be 20% for 2009, 22% for 2010, 24% for 2011, and
25% thereafter.
The income tax provision for fiscal 2007 was the result of providing for taxes in certain state and
foreign jurisdictions.
Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Joint Venture
In fiscal 2007, we recorded a charge of $26.2 million related to the acquisition of the 49 percent
interest in H3C held by Huawei prior to our purchase. In fiscal 2008 we had no minority interest.
Comparison of fiscal 2007 and 2006
During the year ended June 1, 2007 we experienced strong results in our H3C segment and improved
results in our TippingPoint segment offset by declines in our DVBU segments sales and we reduced
operating expenses in our DVBU business segment, offset in part by investment in the TippingPoint
security business.
Sales
The increase in sales from the 2006 fiscal year to the 2007 fiscal year was primarily due to the
inclusion of full year H3C sales in the current period, as well as increased sales of TippingPoint
security products. The increase was partially offset by decreases in networking revenues in our
DVBU segment.
The following table shows our sales from products categories in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of total sales for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
1,028.1 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
$ |
577.0 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
% |
Security |
|
|
120.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Voice |
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Services |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Connectivity Products |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
794.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Networking revenue includes sales of our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable 10/100/1000 managed
switching lines, our modular switching lines, routers, wireless switching offerings and our small
to medium-sized enterprise market products. Sales of our networking products in fiscal 2007
increased 78 percent from fiscal 2006. The increase in sales was primarily driven by the inclusion
of full year results from our H3C segment offset in part by decreases in DVBU sales.
Security revenue includes our TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security
products in our H3C and DVBU segments, such as virtual private network, or VPN, and network access
control, or NAC, offerings. Sales of our security products in fiscal 2007 increased 36 percent from
fiscal 2006. The increase is primarily attributable to organic growth in sales of our TippingPoint
segments security products in fiscal 2007 and the inclusion of H3Cs full year results of security
product sales.
Voice revenue includes our VCX and NBX® voice-over-internet protocol, or VoIP, product lines, as
well as voice gateway offerings. Sales of our VoIP telephony products in fiscal 2007 increased 20
percent from fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of full year results
from our H3C segment.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security revenue. Service revenue in fiscal 2007 increased 7
percent from fiscal 2006. The increase in sales was primarily driven by the inclusion of full year
results from our H3C segment.
Connectivity Products revenue includes our legacy network interface card, personal computer card,
and mini-peripheral component interconnect offerings. At the end of fiscal 2007 sales of these
products are close to zero with continued revenue only expected to be from royalty arrangements.
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
233.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
$ |
248.5 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
Latin and South America |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Europe,
Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
272.8 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
298.5 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
Asia Pacific, excluding China |
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
China |
|
|
587.1 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
84.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
794.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography to the extent available is reported based on the customers
designated delivery point, except in the case of H3Cs OEM sales which are based on the hub
locations of H3Cs OEM partners. China sales increased 597 percent primarily due to the inclusion
of H3C results for the full year in fiscal 2007.
Gross Margin
Gross margin by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
H3C |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
47.5 |
% |
DVBU |
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
Intercompany eliminations and other |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
45.6 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin in our H3C segment decreased 0.3 points to 47.2 percent in fiscal 2007 from 47.5
percent in fiscal 2006. The decline in gross margin was primarily driven by increased intercompany
sales with lower margins.
Gross margin in our DVBU segment decreased 2.8 points to 32.9 percent in fiscal 2007 from 35.7
percent in the previous fiscal year. The decline is primarily explained by less favorable product
mix, price reductions and to a lesser extent decreased sales volume, partially offset by product
cost reductions.
41
Gross margin in our TippingPoint segment decreased 3.7 points to 66.9 percent in fiscal 2007 from
70.6 percent in the previous fiscal year. This decline was primarily due to increased costs due to
product quality issues incurred in fiscal year 2007.
Gross margin related to intercompany eliminations and other increased 8.0 points to 8.0 percent in
fiscal 2007 from 0.0 percent in the previous fiscal year. This category contains our intercompany
eliminations and other items in fiscal 2007 which were not present in the prior fiscal year, which
primarily includes the amortization of the purchase accounting step-up in inventory from our
acquisition of the remaining 49 percent of H3C.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses in fiscal 2007 were $711.0 million, compared to $485.2 million in fiscal 2006, a
net increase of $225.8 million. Included in the increase in operating expenses were H3C operating
expenses of $354.0 million for the full year ended May 31, 2007 as compared to $36.6 million for
the two months consolidated in 2006. In addition, the incurrence of the change-in-control portion
of H3Cs EARP bonus program contributed compensation expenses of $51.5 million in the year ended
May 31, 2007, which were not incurred in the previous fiscal year. This increase was partially
offset by significant cost reduction in our DVBU segment as compared to the previous year. The
full year inclusion of H3C was the primary contributor to increases in sales and marketing expenses
of $45.0 million, research and development expenses of $113.8 million, general and administrative
expenses of $21.3 million, and amortization of intangibles of $21.6 million. Purchase accounting
charges related to the acquisition of the remaining 49 percent interest of H3C was the main
contributor to the increase in in-process research and development of $35.1 million. These
increases were partially offset by the decrease of restructuring charges of $10.9 million.
As a percent of sales, total operating expenses in fiscal 2007 were 56.1 percent, compared to 61.0
percent in fiscal 2006. In aggregate, sales and marketing, research and development, and general
and administrative expenses were 49.6 percent of sales in fiscal 2007, compared to 56.5 percent in
fiscal 2006, and increased $180.0 million in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. We believe that
to a significant degree, these expenses are controllable and discretionary over time, but they are
not directly variable with sales levels within a particular period. The most significant component
of the increase of $180.0 million was the
inclusion of $292 million of H3C expenses for the entire fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 partially
offset by significant cost reductions in our DVBU segment.
A more detailed discussion of the factors affecting each major component of total operating
expenses is provided below.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2007 increased $45.0 million compared
to fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of H3C expenses for the entire
fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. In addition, the incurrence of the change-in-control portion of
H3Cs EARP bonus program contributed compensation expenses of $17.7 million in our H3C segment in
the year ended May 31, 2007. The expenses were not incurred in the 2006 fiscal year and were
partially offset by a reduction in the DVBU sales and marketing expenses. The reduction of the
DVBU sales and marketing expenses were primarily related to the reduction of programmatic marketing
expenses, and a reduction in employee related expenses due to our restructuring efforts.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses in fiscal 2007 increased $113.8
million compared to fiscal 2006. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of H3C expenses
for the entire fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. In addition, the incurrence of the
change-in-control portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program contributed compensation expenses of $27.2
million in our H3C segment in the year ended May 31, 2007. These expenses were not incurred in the
previous fiscal year and were partially offset by the reduction in DVBU research and development
expenses. The decrease in the DVBU research and development costs was related to reduced
non-recurring engineering projects and employee related expenses which was slightly offset by
increased investment in TippingPoint research and development.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2007 increased $21.3
million from fiscal 2006. This increase is primarily due to the inclusion of H3C expenses for the
entire fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. In addition, the incurrence of the change-in-control
portion of H3Cs EARP bonus program contributed compensation expenses of $6.6 million in our H3C
segment in the year ended May 31, 2007. These expenses were not incurred in the previous fiscal
year and were partially offset by a reduction in the Corporate segment general and administrative
expenses. The reduction of the Corporate segment general and administrative expenses were
primarily related to the reduced workforce-related expenses due to our restructuring initiatives
and reduced IT and facilities-related expenses.
42
Amortization and Write-Down of Intangibles. Amortization and write-down of intangibles were $42.5
million in fiscal 2007 and $20.9 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $21.6 million.
Amortization and write-down of intangibles increased due primarily to the inclusion of H3C expenses
for the entire fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. The amortization expense related to the March 29,
2007 purchase of 49 percent of H3C in 2007 is through March 31, 2007 as we record H3C results on a
two month lag.
In-process research and development. $34.1 million of the total purchase price of 49 percent of the
remaining minority interest in H3C was preliminarily allocated to in-process research and
development and was expensed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. Projects that qualify as
in-process research and development represent those that have not yet reached technological
feasibility and which have no alternative future use. At the time of acquisition, H3C had multiple
in-process research and development efforts under way for certain current and future product lines.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges were $3.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $14.4 million in
fiscal 2006. Restructuring charges in fiscal 2007 were composed primarily of
charges for actions taken in fiscal 2007, including employee severance and outplacement costs of
$12.1 million, and facilities-related credits of $7.5 million. Restructuring charges for fiscal
2007 were the result of reductions in workforce and continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of
excess facilities.
Gain on Investments, Net
During fiscal 2007, net gains on investments were $1.1 million, primarily reflecting gains from
sales of certain equity securities. During fiscal 2006, net gains on investments were $4.3
million, primarily reflecting gains from sales of certain equity securities.
Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income, net, was $79.2 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of $41.9 million
compared to $37.3 million in fiscal 2006. Contributing to the increase was $30.6 million of other
income from H3C for an operating subsidy program by the Chinese VAT authorities in the form of a
partial refund of VAT taxes collected by H3C from purchasers of software products. An increase in
interest income accounted for $12.0 million of the increase, primarily attributable to higher
interest rates applicable to short-term investments and the inclusion of a full year of results of
H3C. Interest income and interest expense related to H3C are included through the period ended
March 31, 2007. Thus, there is only three days of interest expense recorded related to the debt
incurred on March 28, 2007. In fiscal 2006 our results reflected a quarterly VAT payment that was
received during the two month period of H3Cs results that are in our consolidated financials.
Future subsidy payments, which are funded by VAT receipts, are subject to the discretion of Chinese
VAT authorities.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
Our income tax provision was $10.2 million in fiscal 2007, compared to an income tax benefit of
$14.8 million in fiscal 2006. The income tax provision for fiscal 2007 was the result of providing
for taxes in certain state and foreign jurisdictions. The tax benefit for fiscal 2006 was the
result of a $23.0 million benefit resulting from a tax settlement with foreign tax authorities in
the second quarter of fiscal 2006, for which reserves had been provided in prior years and which
have now been reversed into income upon reaching settlement. Partially offsetting the income tax
benefit for fiscal 2006 was the provision of additional taxes in certain state and foreign
jurisdictions.
Minority Interest in the Income of Consolidated Joint Venture
In fiscal 2007, we recorded a charge of $26.2 million related to the acquisition of the 49 percent
interest in H3C held by Huawei prior to our purchase. In fiscal 2006, we recorded a charge of
$11.1 million representing Huaweis 49 percent interest in the net income reported by the former
H3C joint venture for the two month period included in our fiscal 2006.
43
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and equivalents as of May 31, 2008 were $503.6 million, a decrease of approximately $55.6
million compared to the balance of $559.2 million as of May 31, 2007. These balances were
comprised of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
503.6 |
|
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents and short term investments |
|
$ |
503.6 |
|
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
|
$ |
864.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The May 31, 2008 and 2007 balance included cash and equivalents in our H3C segment of $338.9
million and $328.7 million, respectively.
The following table shows the major components of our consolidated statements of cash flows for the
last three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
$ |
268.5 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
(86.2 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(505.9 |
) |
|
|
300.8 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(123.9 |
) |
|
|
387.9 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
503.6 |
|
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other primarily represents currency exchange appreciation for cash held in Renminbi |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.9 million for fiscal 2008. The cash generation
was largely due to non-cash adjustments to our net loss which included $158.0 million of goodwill
impairment, $136.0 million of depreciation and amortization and $25.2 million of stock based
compensation, as well as significant reductions in inventories and other assets, which were
partially offset by our net loss and decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities.
Based on current business conditions and our current operating and financial plans, we believe that
our existing cash and equivalents will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash and debt
payment requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Significant commitments that will require the use of cash in future periods include obligations
under debt, lease, contract manufacturing and outsourcing agreements, as shown in the following
table (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Contractual Obligations (1)(2) |
|
Total |
|
|
one year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
57.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase commitments with
contract manufacturers (3) |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt (4) |
|
|
301.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
116.0 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing agreements (5) |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
438.7 |
|
|
$ |
163.4 |
|
|
$ |
138.2 |
|
|
$ |
137.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes DVBU, TippingPoint and Corporate segment obligations as of May 31, 2008 and H3C
segment obligations as of March 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
As discussed in Note 17 Income Taxes, we have recorded a liability for unrecognized tax
benefits of $18.2 million. This liability is included in the balance sheet under the caption
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations. The table above excludes this liability because it is
not possible to estimate with reasonable certainty if or when any or all of the liability will be
settled in cash. |
44
|
|
|
(3) |
|
We have entered into purchase agreements with our contract manufacturers. Pursuant to these
agreements, if our actual orders and purchases fall below forecasted levels, we may be required to
purchase finished goods inventory manufactured to meet our requirements. In addition, we may be
required to purchase raw material and work in process inventory on-hand that is unique to our
products, and we may be required to compensate the contract manufacturers with respect to their
non-cancelable purchase orders for such inventory. The amount shown in the table above represents
our estimate of inventory held by contract manufacturers that we could be required to purchase
within the next 12 months. We do not expect any such required purchases to exceed our requirements
for inventory to meet expected sales of our products to our customers. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents required principal payments on our senior secured loan, but does not include
required excess cash flow payments, for periods greater than one year, which are dependent on
whether H3C generates any excess cash flow. |
|
(5) |
|
Under our IT outsourcing agreements and research and development agreement we are subject to
service level commitments and contractor commitments levels providing for annual minimum payments
that vary depending on the levels we choose. The amounts shown in the table above represent the
amounts that would be payable, based on current levels, through the expiration of the agreements.
However, our IT agreement may be terminated at any time upon 120 days notice and the payment of a
termination fee of approximately $0.3 million, and our research and development agreement may be
terminated at any time with a $0.8 million payment. |
We have no material commitments for capital expenditures as of May 31, 2008 other than ordinary
course of business purchases of computer hardware, software and leasehold improvements which we
generally believe to be consistent with prior practice. In addition, although no firm commitments
exist today, as we further develop our worldwide integration plans we may decide to make capital
expenditure investments in infrastructure to support a more integrated Company in amounts which
could be material.
Net cash used in investing activities was $16.4 million for fiscal 2008, including $17.9 million of
outflows related to the purchase of property and equipment. We made no equity
investments in fiscal 2008 and $225.0 million in fiscal 2007, in municipal and corporate bonds,
government agency instruments and equity securities. In August 2006, we sold certain venture
capital limited partnership interests and generated cash of approximately $17.0 million with a gain
on sale of investment of $2.4 million and eliminated our future capital call requirements. Proceeds
from maturities and sales of municipal and corporate bonds, government agency instruments and
equity securities were $0.4 million in fiscal 2008 and $609.3 million in fiscal 2007. Included in
the $609.3 million were sales of our remaining venture portfolio investments that generated cash of
approximately $1.3 million. In fiscal 2007 we also had $898.5 million of business acquisitions net
of cash acquired, as well as $36.6 million of proceeds from the sale of the Santa Clara facility
and insurance proceeds for the damage to our Hemel Hemstead facility.
Net cash used in financing activities was $123.9 million for fiscal 2008, which includes $129.0
million of payments under our H3C loans, including a $35 million prepayment due to excess operating
cash flows from our H3C segment. During fiscal 2008, we also repurchased shares of restricted stock
valued at $3.2 million upon vesting of awards from employees consisting of shares to satisfy the
tax withholding obligations that arise in connection with such vesting. This was offset by proceeds
of $8.3 million from issuances
of our common stock upon exercise of stock options. During fiscal 2005, we entered a new agreement
facilitating the issuance of standby letters of credit and bank guarantees required in the normal
course of business. As of May 31, 2008, such bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees
totaled $6.9 million, including $6.2 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty
assessments.
During fiscal 2008, we issued approximately 3.6 million shares of our common stock in connection
with our employee stock purchase and option plans with total proceeds from such issuances of $12.9
million. As of May 31, 2008, our outstanding stock options as a percentage of outstanding shares
were 11 percent.
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
original credit agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term
loan with two tranches (Tranche A and Tranche B) to finance a portion of the purchase price for
3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C. Remaining principal is
$301 million as of May 30, 2008 and the final loan maturity date is on September 28, 2012.
45
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28. All amounts
outstanding under the Tranche A Term Facility will bear interest, at the Borrowers option, at the
(i) LIBOR, or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate), in each case plus the applicable margin
percentage set forth in the table below, which is based on a leverage ratio of consolidated
indebtedness of the Borrower and its subsidiaries to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement)
for the relevant twelve-month period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
LIBOR + |
|
Base Rate + |
>3.0:10
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
£
3.0:1.0 but > 2.0:1.0
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
£ 2.0:1.0 but > 1.0:1.0
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
£ 1.0:1.0
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
All amounts outstanding under the Tranche B Term Facility will bear interest, at the Borrowers
option, at the (i) LIBOR plus 3.00 percent or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate) plus 2.00
percent. We have elected to use LIBOR as the reference rate for borrowings to date, and expect to
do so for the foreseeable future. Applicable LIBOR rates at year end were 2.63 percent and the
effective interest rate is 4.38 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and 5.63 percent for the
Tranche B Term Facility.
Covenants and other restrictions under the Credit Agreement apply to the Borrower and its
subsidiaries, which we refer to as the H3C Group, but not to 3Coms DVBU, TippingPoint and
Corporate segments. The loans are secured by assets at the H3C level. H3C also guarantees the
loans.
The loans may be prepaid in whole or in part without premium or penalty. The Borrower will be
required to make mandatory prepayments using net proceeds from H3C Group (i) asset sales,
(ii) insurance proceeds and (iii) equity offerings or debt incurrence. In addition, the Borrower
will be required to make annual prepayments in an amount equal to 75 percent of excess cash flow
of the H3C Group. This percentage will decrease to the extent that the Borrowers leverage ratio is
lower than specified amounts. Any excess cash flow amounts not required to prepay the loan may be
distributed to and used by the Companys other segments, provided certain conditions are met.
The Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage, minimum interest coverage, maximum
capital expenditures and a maximum total leverage ratio. Negative covenants restrict, among other
things, (i) the incurrence of indebtedness by the Borrower and its subsidiaries, (ii) the making of
dividends and distributions to 3Coms other segments, (iii) the ability to make investments
including in new subsidiaries, (iv) the ability to undertake mergers and acquisitions and (v) sales
of assets. Also, cash dividends from the PRC subsidiaries to H3C, and H3C to the Borrower, will be
subject to restricted use pending payment of principal, interest and excess cash flow prepayments.
Standard events of default and defaulted interest rates apply.
Remaining payments of the $301.0 million principal on the loans are due as follows on September 28,
for fiscal years ending May 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche A |
|
Tranche B |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
The closing of the remaining 49 percent acquisition of H3C triggered a bonus program for
substantially all of H3Cs approximately 4,800 employees. This program, which was implemented by
Huawei and 3Com in a prior period, is called the Equity Appreciation Rights Plan, or EARP, and
funds a bonus pool based upon a percentage of the
appreciation in H3Cs value from the initiation of the program to the time of the closing of the
Acquisition. A portion of the program is also based on cumulative earnings of H3C. The total value
of the EARP is expected to be approximately $180 million. Approximately $94 million (related to
cumulative earnings and change-in-control) was accrued by March 31, 2007 and was paid in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2008. At May 31, 2008, we accrued $35 million for the fiscal 2008 EARP plan
which is expected to be paid in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We expect the unvested
portion amounting to $44 million will be accrued in H3C operating segment over the next 3 fiscal
years serving as a continued retention and incentive program for H3C employees. The only
stipulation for payout is that the participants remain employed with the Company on the date of the
payout which is required to be made within a specified period after the anniversary date of our 49
percent H3C acquisition on March 29, 2007.
46
Remaining cash payment requirements under the Equity Appreciation Rights Plan for fiscal years
ending May 31 are approximately as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
2010
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
2011
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
It is expected that we will have significant cash outflows in fiscal 2009 of $62.5 million of loan
payments for principal and interest and approximately $35 million for EARP commitments.
On July 11, 2008, we entered into three agreements with Realtek Group which document the resolution
of the patent dispute between the parties and provide for the non-exclusive license by 3Com to
Realtek of certain patents and related network interface technology for license fees totaling $70
million. The fees are payable by Realtek to 3Com during our first fiscal quarter of 2009. 3Com is
also obligated to pay $9 million in previously-expensed litigation fees to our outside counsel.
EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For additional information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk Disclosures. The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves
forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates,
foreign currency exchange rates, and equity security price risk. We do not use derivative
financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Interest to be paid by us on our senior secured loan is at an interest
rate based, at our option, on either the LIBOR or the prime rate, plus an
applicable margin. We expect the base interest rate generally to be based on the published LIBOR
rate, which is subject to change on a periodic basis. Recently, interest rates have trended
upwards in major global financial markets. If these interest rate trends continue, this will
result in increased interest rate expense as a result of higher LIBOR rates. Continued increases
in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, particularly if such increases are substantial. In addition, interest
rate trends could affect global economic conditions.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. Our risk management strategy currently uses forward contracts to
hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on
the underlying exposures with gains and losses resulting from the forward contracts that hedge
these exposures. We attempt to reduce the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on corporate
financial results by hedging existing foreign currency exposures and anticipated foreign currency
transactions expected to occur within one month. Anticipated foreign currency transaction exposures
with a maturity profile in excess of one month may be selectively hedged. Translation exposures
are not hedged. Due to the limitations on converting Renminbi, we are limited in our ability to
engage in currency hedging activities in China and do not hedge the Renminbi at this time. With the
recent appreciation of the Renminbi against the US dollar, during fiscal 2008 we experienced a
benefit from the positive currency fluctuations, and the financial
results of China were favorable. At the same time, our senior secured
bank loan which we intend to service and repay primarily
through cash flow from H3Cs PRC operations is denominated
in US dollars.
Gains and losses on the forward contracts are largely offset by gains and losses on the underlying
exposure. A hypothetical ten percent appreciation of the U.S. Dollar from May 31, 2008 market
rates would increase the unrealized value of our forward contracts by $3.3 million. Conversely, a
hypothetical ten percent depreciation of the U.S. Dollar from May 31, 2008 market rates would
decrease the unrealized value of our forward contracts by $3.3 million. The gains or losses on the
forward contracts are largely offset by the gains or losses on the underlying transactions and
consequently we believe that a sudden or significant change in foreign exchange rates would not
have a material impact on future net income or cash flows other than with respect to the Renminbi.
47
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Financial Statement Schedule: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
All other schedules are omitted, because they are not required, are not applicable, or the
information is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 3Com Corporation
Marlborough, Massachusetts:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 3Com Corporation and subsidiaries
(3Com) as of May 30, 2008 and June 1, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 30, 2008.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item
15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of 3Coms
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of 3Com at May 30, 2008 and June 1,
2007, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
May 30, 2008, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, 3Com adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment,
effective June 3, 2006.
We have also audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), 3Coms internal control over financial reporting as of
May 30, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated July 25,
2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on 3Coms internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 25, 2008
49
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,294,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,481 |
|
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
640,424 |
|
|
|
689,027 |
|
|
|
466,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
654,455 |
|
|
|
578,454 |
|
|
|
328,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
316,019 |
|
|
|
319,696 |
|
|
|
274,745 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
206,653 |
|
|
|
215,632 |
|
|
|
101,870 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
129,116 |
|
|
|
93,875 |
|
|
|
72,596 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
103,670 |
|
|
|
42,525 |
|
|
|
20,903 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
157,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,753 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
917,936 |
|
|
|
710,975 |
|
|
|
485,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(263,481 |
) |
|
|
(132,521 |
) |
|
|
(157,103 |
) |
Gain on investments, net |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
4,333 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
|
(13,087 |
) |
|
|
40,863 |
|
|
|
29,085 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
44,364 |
|
|
|
38,291 |
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before income taxes, equity
interest in income of unconsolidated joint venture, and
minority interest in income of consolidated joint
venture |
|
|
(231,744 |
) |
|
|
(52,224 |
) |
|
|
(115,450 |
) |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
(10,173 |
) |
|
|
14,833 |
|
Equity interest in income of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,192 |
) |
|
|
(11,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(228,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,589 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
399,524 |
|
|
|
393,894 |
|
|
|
386,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
50
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
65,116 |
|
|
|
77,368 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
for doubtful accounts of $12,253 and
$15,292, respectively |
|
|
116,281 |
|
|
|
102,952 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
90,831 |
|
|
|
107,988 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
34,033 |
|
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
809,905 |
|
|
|
897,682 |
|
Property and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $205,835
and $234,554, respectively |
|
|
54,314 |
|
|
|
76,460 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
609,297 |
|
|
|
766,444 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
278,385 |
|
|
|
371,289 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
23,229 |
|
|
|
39,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,775,130 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
90,280 |
|
|
$ |
110,430 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
366,181 |
|
|
|
435,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
504,461 |
|
|
|
640,068 |
|
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations |
|
|
22,367 |
|
|
|
23,725 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
253,000 |
|
|
|
336,000 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
10,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value,
990,000 shares authorized; shares
issued: 405,656 and 399,064,
respectively |
|
|
2,353,688 |
|
|
|
2,323,356 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,405,247 |
) |
|
|
(1,176,406 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
46,861 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
995,302 |
|
|
|
1,151,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,775,130 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Stock-based |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances, May 31, 2005 |
|
|
393,377 |
|
|
|
2,302,190 |
|
|
|
(8,135 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(967,952 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,483 |
) |
|
$ |
1,274,923 |
|
Components of comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,675 |
) |
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale securities, net
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,149 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(2,848 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(4,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,076 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans,
net of cancellations |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
8,999 |
|
|
|
44,049 |
|
|
|
(4,593 |
) |
|
|
(18,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,801 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
Reduction of shares reserved for
issuance of options in connection with
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2006 |
|
|
393,442 |
|
|
|
2,300,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,565 |
) |
|
|
(1,087,512 |
) |
|
|
(2,957 |
) |
|
|
1,202,362 |
|
Elimination of unamortized stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,589 |
) |
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale securities, net
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,283 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
|
|
(9,041 |
) |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(4,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,463 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans,
net of cancellations |
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,588 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2007 |
|
|
399,064 |
|
|
|
2,323,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,176,406 |
) |
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
1,151,299 |
|
Components of comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,841 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale securities, net
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
Accumulated translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,721 |
|
|
|
42,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186,329 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
(3,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,180 |
) |
Common stock issued under stock plans,
net of cancellations |
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, May 31, 2008 |
|
|
405,656 |
|
|
$ |
2,353,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,405,247 |
) |
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
$ |
995,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
3COM CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(228,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,589 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
136,030 |
|
|
|
74,990 |
|
|
|
44,685 |
|
Loss (gain) on property and equipment disposals |
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
(14,714 |
) |
|
|
(646 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,192 |
|
|
|
11,074 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
25,207 |
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
Gain on investments, net |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,206 |
) |
|
|
(10,487 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
157,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,753 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Equity interest in income of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,016 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
7,895 |
|
|
|
(24,677 |
) |
|
|
5,913 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
32,621 |
|
|
|
50,589 |
|
|
|
(23,047 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
18,429 |
|
|
|
32,368 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(22,926 |
) |
|
|
(34,760 |
) |
|
|
3,430 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(65,348 |
) |
|
|
100,195 |
|
|
|
(28,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
54,877 |
|
|
|
165,538 |
|
|
|
(86,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,005 |
) |
|
|
(421,279 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
609,342 |
|
|
|
629,036 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(17,893 |
) |
|
|
(28,331 |
) |
|
|
(17,404 |
) |
Businesses
acquired in purchase transactions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(898,529 |
) |
|
|
110,407 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
36,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(16,355 |
) |
|
|
(505,943 |
) |
|
|
300,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
23,588 |
|
|
|
22,801 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(3,180 |
) |
|
|
(13,463 |
) |
|
|
(7,076 |
) |
Net proceeds from long term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
(129,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid to minority interest shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(123,875 |
) |
|
|
387,938 |
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
29,780 |
|
|
|
10,587 |
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents during period |
|
|
(55,573 |
) |
|
|
58,120 |
|
|
|
232,562 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
559,217 |
|
|
|
501,097 |
|
|
|
268,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
|
$ |
501,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
24,362 |
|
|
$ |
5,596 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
Income tax (payments) refunds received, net |
|
|
(14,199 |
) |
|
|
(18,970 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
Inventory transferred to property and equipment |
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
16,995 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Description of Business
We are incorporated in Delaware. A pioneer in the computer networking industry, we provide secure,
converged networking solutions, as well as maintenance and support services, for enterprises and
public sector organizations of all sizes. Headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts, we have
worldwide operations, including sales, marketing, research and development, and customer service
and support capabilities.
Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies
Fiscal
year
Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to May 31. Fiscal 2008 consisted of 52 weeks and ended
on May 30, 2008. Fiscal 2007 consisted of 52 weeks and ended on June 1, 2007 and fiscal 2006
consisted of the 52 weeks ended on June 2, 2006. For convenience, the consolidated financial
statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month.
Use of estimates in the preparation of consolidated financial statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make assumptions and estimates
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of sales,
costs and expenses during the reporting periods. Such management assumptions and estimates include
allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, product returns, rebates and price protection;
provisions for inventory to reflect net realizable value; estimates of fair value for investments
in privately held companies, goodwill and other intangible assets, estimation of fair value of
acquired businesses, and properties held for sale; valuation allowances against deferred income tax
assets; and accruals for severance costs, compensation, product warranty, other liabilities, and
income taxes, among others. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of 3Com, its wholly-owned subsidiaries
and its other subsidiaries we have determined it is appropriate to consolidate. All intercompany
balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. As discussed in Notes 3 and 5, we
accounted for our investment in the H3C joint venture by the equity method until fiscal 2006,
during which we exercised an option to acquire a further 2% interest in the joint venture and
obtained control of H3C. We were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese government and
subsequently completed this control transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition). Since
that time, we have owned a majority interest in the joint venture and have determined that the
criteria of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-16, Investors Accounting for an Investee When the
Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have
Certain Approval or Veto Rights have been met. Accordingly, we consolidate H3Cs financial
statements beginning February 1, 2006, a date used under the principle of convenience close. We
acquired the remaining 49 percent minority interest of H3C on March 29, 2007. H3C follows a
calendar year basis of reporting and therefore, H3C is consolidated on a two-month lag.
Segment reporting
As of May 31, 2008, we were organized in four reportable segments: Data and Voice Business Unit
(DVBU), TippingPoint security division (TippingPoint), H3C, and corporate expenses
(Corporate). As of May 31, 2007, we were organized in two reportable segments: Secured Converged
Networking (SCN) and H3C. The SCN reportable segment was comprised of all business activities
outside of our wholly-owned subsidiary, H3C. The H3C segment was comprised of operations of our
wholly-owned subsidiary based in China. Prior to 2006 we had one reportable segment. Amounts for
fiscal years 2007 and 2006 have been recast to conform to the current management view.
Cash equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments in debt securities with maturities of three
months or less when purchased.
54
Notes receivable
Notes receivable represent bills receivable from seventeen Chinese banks to our H3C subsidiary
that have maturities of less than six months. These notes originate from customers who settle
their commitments to H3C by providing us these bills issued by the Chinese banks. The Chinese
banks are responsible to pay H3C. The notes are also commonly referred to as bankers
acceptances.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We monitor payments from our customers on an on-going basis and maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required
payments. When we evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for doubtful accounts, we take into
account various factors including our accounts receivable aging, customer creditworthiness,
historical bad debts, and geographic and political risk. If the financial condition of our
customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances might be required.
Equity securities and other investments
We account for non-marketable equity securities and other investments at historical cost or, if we
have the ability to exert significant influence over the investee, by the equity method.
Investments accounted for by the equity method include investments in limited partnership venture
capital funds and, prior to the acquisition of majority ownership on January 27, 2006, the
investment in H3C. In accounting for these investments by the equity method, we record our
proportionate share of the funds net income or loss, or H3Cs net income or loss, based on the
most recently available quarterly financial statements. Since H3C has adopted a calendar year
basis of reporting, we reported our equity in H3Cs net income or loss based on H3Cs most recent
quarterly financial statements, two months in arrears. For the year ended May 31, 2006 we
accounted for H3C under the equity method for the initial ten months of the year. At May 31, 2008
we no longer held any equity securities.
Concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash and equivalents, short-term investments, notes receivable and accounts
receivable. For our cash and equivalents in China we maintain a minimum BBB+ rating and for the
period ended March 31, 2008 the average rating was A.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or market, which approximates actual cost.
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Equipment under capital leases is stated at the lower of fair market value or the present value of
the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease. We capitalize eligible costs related to
the application development phase of software developed internally or obtained for internal use.
Capitalized costs related to internal-use software are amortized using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to five years; the amounts
charged to amortization expense were $0.3 million in fiscal 2008, $0.4 million in fiscal 2007, and
$0.7 million in fiscal 2006.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be held and used are subject to
periodic amortization and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of
recoverability of long-lived assets is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows
resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss
for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold
and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of property and equipment are generally 2-15 years,
except for buildings for which the useful lives are 25-40 years. As of the date of the balance
sheets presented we did not own any buildings with a remaining net
book value. Depreciation and amortization of leasehold
improvements are computed using the shorter of the remaining lease terms or estimated useful life.
55
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests when
events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. We test our goodwill for impairment
annually during our third fiscal quarter. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 we conducted an
additional impairment test of our goodwill due to the decline in our stock price as discussed more
fully in Note 9. As a result of this testing, we recorded a $158 million goodwill impairment in
fiscal year 2008. There was no impairment of goodwill in fiscal years 2007 or 2006. Furthermore,
SFAS No. 142 requires purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their
useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Purchased intangible assets are
carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed over the estimated useful
lives of the respective assets, generally 2 7 years.
Revenue recognition
We recognize a sale when the product has been delivered and risk of loss has passed to the
customer, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, and the fee is fixed or determinable. The assessment of whether the fee is
fixed or determinable considers whether a significant portion of the fee is due after our normal
payment terms. If we determine that the fee is not fixed or determinable, we recognize revenue at
the time the fee becomes due, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Also, sales arrangements may contain customer-specific acceptance requirements for both products
and services. In such cases, revenue is deferred at the time of delivery of the product or service
and is recognized upon receipt of customer acceptance.
For arrangements that are not considered software arrangements and which involve multiple elements,
such as sales of products that include maintenance or installation services, revenue is allocated
to each respective element based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue recognition
criteria for each element have been met. We use the residual method to recognize revenue when an
arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and objective evidence
of the fair value of all the undelivered elements exists. Under the residual method, the fair value
of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is
recognized as revenue. If evidence of fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not
exist, revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value
can be established.
We assess collectability based on a number of factors, including general economic and market
conditions, past transaction history with the customer, and the creditworthiness of the customer.
If we determine that collection of the fee is not reasonably assured, then we defer the fee and
recognize revenue upon receipt of payment. We do not typically request collateral from our
customers. In the H3C segment, certain customers pay accounts receivable with notes receivable
from Chinese banks with maturities less than six months. These are also referred to as bankers
acceptances.
A significant portion of our sales is made to distributors and value added resellers (VARs).
Revenue is generally recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, assuming all
other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Sales to these customers are recorded net of
appropriate allowances, including estimates for product returns, price protection, and excess
channel inventory levels. We maintain reserves for potential allowances and adjustments; if the
actual level of returns and adjustments differ from the assumptions we use to develop those
reserves, additional allowances and charges might be required.
For sales of products that contain software that is marketed separately, we apply the provisions of
AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. We generally sell
our software products with maintenance services, which includes the rights to updates and
enhancements, and, in some cases, also with consulting services. For these undelivered elements, we
determine vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value to be the price charged when the
undelivered element is sold separately. We determine VSOE for maintenance sold in connection with
product based on the amount that will be separately charged for the maintenance renewal period. We
determine VSOE for consulting services by reference to the amount charged for similar engagements
when a software license sale is not involved.
We recognize revenue from software licenses sold together with maintenance and/or consulting
services upon shipment using the residual method, provided that the above criteria have been met.
Under the residual method, revenue associated with undelivered elements is deferred based on VSOE,
and any remaining amounts are considered related to the delivered elements and recognized providing
all other revenue recognition criteria are met. If VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements
cannot be established, we defer all revenue from the arrangement until the earlier of the point at
which such sufficient VSOE does exist or all elements of the arrangement have been delivered.
56
We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the applicable agreement. Sales of
services, including professional services, system integration, project management, and training,
are recognized upon delivery of the service.
Royalty
revenue is generally recognized when any performance by 3Com is
complete and payment has been received.
Product warranty
We provide limited warranty on most of our products for periods ranging from 90 days to the
lifetime of the product, depending upon the product. The warranty generally includes parts, labor
and service center support. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under our warranty
obligations and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time sales are recognized.
Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical and
anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of
our recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary.
Advertising
Costs associated with cooperative advertising programs are estimated and recorded as a reduction of
revenue at the time the related sales are recognized. All other advertising costs are expensed as
incurred in sales and marketing.
Restructuring charges
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure. In connection with these initiatives, we have recorded
significant restructuring charges, as more fully described in Note 4. Generally, costs associated
with an exit or disposal activity are recognized when the liability is incurred. Costs related to
employee separation arrangements requiring future service beyond a specified minimum retention
period are recognized over the service period.
Foreign currency remeasurement and translation
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency transaction
costs. The majority of our DVBU and TippingPoint sales transactions are denominated in U.S.
dollars. The majority of our H3C sales are denominated in Renminbi. For foreign operations with
the local currency as the functional currency, local currency denominated assets and liabilities
are translated at the year-end exchange rates, and sales, costs and expenses are translated at the
average exchange rates during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency
translation are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the
consolidated balance sheets. For foreign operations with the U.S. dollar as the functional
currency, foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured at the year-end
exchange rates except for property and equipment which are remeasured at historical exchange rates.
Foreign currency denominated sales, costs and expenses are recorded at the average exchange rates
during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency remeasurement are included in
other income, net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
Our risk management strategy uses forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency exposures.
The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, whether recorded
on the balance sheet or anticipated to occur in the future, with gains and losses resulting from
the forward contracts that hedge these exposures. These contracts are carried at fair value, and
changes in their fair value, to the extent that the contract does not qualify as an accounting
hedge, are expensed in the current period in other income, net. In addition, we enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts to hedge exposures related to anticipated foreign currency cash flows.
These contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, also are recorded at fair value. The gain or loss
from the effective portion of the qualifying hedge is reported in the consolidated statement of
operations in the same period or periods and manner as the hedged transaction. The gain or loss
from the ineffective portion of the hedge is recognized in other income (expense), net, during the
period of change. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes, nor
do we use leveraged financial instruments. Due to the limitations on converting Renminbi, we do
not engage in currency hedging activities in China at this time.
Other income, net included net foreign currency losses of $4.2 million in fiscal year 2008, $1.2
million in fiscal year 2007 and $1.5 million in fiscal year 2006.
57
Income taxes
We are subject to income tax in a number of jurisdictions. A certain degree of estimation is
required in recording the assets and liabilities related to income taxes, and it is reasonably
possible those such assets may not be recovered and that such liabilities may not be paid or that
payments in excess of amounts initially estimated and accrued may be required. We assess the
likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from our future taxable income and, to
the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. We consider
historical taxable income, estimates of future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and feasible tax
planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance. Based on various factors,
including our recent losses, retained deficit, operating performance in fiscal 2008, and estimates
of future profitability, we have concluded that future taxable income will, more likely than not,
be insufficient to recover most of net deferred tax assets as of May 31, 2008. Accordingly, we
have established an appropriate valuation allowance to offset such deferred tax assets.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. We adopted FIN 48 on June 2, 2007, which resulted in no adjustment to
the opening balance of retained earnings. As of May 31, 2008 the Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of $18.2 million.
We recognize tax liabilities for uncertain items in accordance with FIN 48 and we adjust these
liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not
previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate
resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the
tax liabilities.
We recognize interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax
expense line in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As
of May 31, 2008, the amount of interest included in unrecognized tax
benefits was $2.5 million, representing an increase of
$0.4 million from the date of adoption. There were no penalties accrued in all periods presented.
We have
net operating loss carryforwards related to the following income tax
jurisdictions and expiration periods: U.S. federal loss
carryforwards of approximately $2.6 billion expiring between
fiscal years 2009 and 2028, substantially all of which expire between
fiscal years 2021 and 2028; various state loss carryforwards of
approximately $1.2 billion expiring between 2009 and 2028; and
various foreign loss carryforwards of $2.9 million expiring
between 2014 and 2018, and $319.0 million with an unlimited
carryforward period.
Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) presented in the financial statements consists of our net loss, the
impact of foreign currency translation and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities.
An analysis of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
(2,401 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,483 |
) |
Change in period |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
|
(2,101 |
) |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(2,957 |
) |
Change in period |
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
Change in period |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
42,721 |
|
|
|
42,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Stock-based Compensation
Prior to fiscal 2007, we accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. As described in Note 14, effective June 3, 2006, we adopted the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation under SFAS 123(R) Share-Based Payment. Under the
intrinsic value method, compensation cost associated with a stock award was measured as the
difference between the fair value of the common stock underlying the award and the amount, if any,
that an employee was required to pay for the award; measurement generally occurred on the date of
grant, which was the date on which the number of shares and price to be paid was apparent. Under
the fair value method, compensation cost associated with a stock award is measured based on the
estimated fair value of the award itself, determined using established valuation models and
principles, and is generally measured as of the date of grant. The amounts measured under either
method are generally recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is typically
the vesting period.
Estimates of the fair value of equity awards in future periods will be affected by the market price
of our common stock, as well as the actual results of certain assumptions used to value the equity
awards. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the expected volatility of the common
stock, the expected term of options granted, the risk free interest rate and dividend yield.
The fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares is determined by using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and applying the single-option approach to the stock option
valuation. The options generally have vesting on an annual basis over a vesting period of four
years. We estimate the expected option term by analyzing the historical term period from grant to
exercise and also consider the expected term for those options that are outstanding. The expected
term of employee stock purchase plan shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under
each offering period. The volatility of the common stock is estimated using historical volatility.
The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model is determined by looking
at historical U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond issues with terms corresponding to the expected terms
of the equity awards. In addition, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option
valuation model, because we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We
estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In order to determine an estimated pre-vesting
option forfeiture rate, we analyzed historical forfeiture data, which yielded a current forfeiture
rate of 27 percent as of the end of the current fiscal year. We believe this historical forfeiture
rate to be reflective of our anticipated rate on a go-forward basis. This estimated forfeiture
rate has been applied to all unvested options and restricted stock outstanding as of June 1, 2006
and to all options and restricted stock granted since June 1, 2006. Therefore, stock-based
compensation expense is recorded only for those options and restricted stock that are expected to
vest.
Net loss per share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common
shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive
common shares consist of employee stock options and restricted stock, and are excluded from the
diluted earnings per share computation in periods where net losses were incurred.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS
No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value
measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by
3Com in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 but was amended on February 6, 2008 to defer the effective
date one year for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We have not yet determined the
impact, if any, that the implementation of SFAS No. 157 will have on our results of operations or
financial condition.
59
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require
assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair
value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities,
equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. Other eligible items
include firm commitments for financial instruments that otherwise would not be recognized at
inception and non-cash warranty obligations where a warrantor is permitted to pay a third party to
provide the warranty goods or services. If the use of fair value is elected, any upfront costs and
fees related to the item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue
costs. The fair value election is irrevocable and generally made on an instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value.
At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been
elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Subsequent to the
adoption of SFAS 159, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by 3Com in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. We have not applied fair value accounting as of the adoption date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations to improve reporting and
to create greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations.
The standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only)
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date
fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and
requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to
evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the
exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. SFAS 141R amends SFAS 109, such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on
deferred income taxes and acquired income tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of SFAS 141R would apply the provisions of SFAS 141R. An entity
may not apply SFAS 141R before that date. Given SFAS 141R relates to prospective and not historical
business combinations, the Company cannot currently determine the potential effects adoption of
SFAS No. 141R may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information
provided to investors by requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in
subsidiaries in the same way as required in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS
No. 160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an
entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring that they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating
whether the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have an effect on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB
Statement 133 (Statement 161). Statement 161 enhances
required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures
regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Statement 161 is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has currently not
determined the potential effects on the consolidated financial statements, if any.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS 162 will become effective 60 days following the SECs
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not
currently expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.
60
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board (APB) 14-1 Accounting for
Convertible Debt instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) on conversion to separately account for
the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers non-convertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 on a retroactive basis. As we do not have convertible debt
at this time, we currently believe the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will have no effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Note 3: Acquisitions
H3C
On November 17, 2003, we formed H3C, formerly known as the Huawei-3Com joint venture, with a
subsidiary of Huawei Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei). H3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and has its
principal operating center in Hangzhou, China.
At the time of formation, we contributed cash of $160.0 million, assets related to our operations
in China and Japan, and licenses related to certain intellectual property in exchange for a 49
percent ownership interest. We recorded our initial investment in H3C at $160.1 million, reflecting
our carrying value for the cash and assets contributed. Huawei contributed its enterprise
networking business assets including Local Area Network (LAN) switches and routers; engineering,
sales and marketing resources and personnel; and licenses to its related intellectual property in
exchange for a 51 percent ownership interest. Huaweis contributed assets were valued at $178.2
million at the time of formation.
Two years after formation of H3C, we had the one-time option to purchase an additional two percent
ownership interest from Huawei. On October 28, 2005, we exercised this right and entered into an
agreement to purchase an additional 2 percent ownership interest in H3C from Huawei for an
aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million. We were granted regulatory approval by the Chinese
government and subsequently completed this transaction on January 27, 2006 (date of acquisition).
Since then, we have owned a majority interest in the joint venture and determined that the criteria
of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-16, Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor
Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain
Approval or Veto Rights were met and, therefore, consolidated H3Cs financial statements beginning
February 1, 2006, a date used under the principle of a convenience close. As H3C reports on a
calendar year basis, we consolidate H3C based on H3Cs most recent financial statements, two months
in arrears.
Three years after formation of H3C, we and Huawei each had the right to initiate a bid process to
purchase the equity interest in H3C held by the other. 3Com initiated the bidding process on
November 15, 2006 to buy Huaweis 49 percent stake in H3C and our bid of $882 million was accepted
by Huawei on November 27, 2006. The transaction closed on March 29, 2007, at which time the
purchase price was paid in full.
The acquisition transactions were all accounted for as purchases, and accordingly, the purchase
price was allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values. Due to our consolidation determination, the operating results of H3C for the period
February 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006 are included in the consolidated financial statements,
resulting in the latter two months of H3Cs three months ended March 31, 2006 being included in
our year ended May 31, 2006 statement of operations.
The purchase prices for our various transactions are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Purchase |
|
Cash paid for common stock |
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
882.0 |
|
Assets contributed |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition direct costs |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
890.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the purchase price was allocated to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including in-process research and
development, based on their estimated fair values. The excess purchase price over those values is
recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are based on managements estimates and assumptions, and other information
compiled by management. Goodwill recorded as a result of these acquisitions is not deductible for
tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill is not amortized but will be reviewed at
least annually for impairment. Purchased intangibles with finite lives will be amortized on a
straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives. The total purchase price has
been allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Purchase |
|
Net tangible assets assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
148.6 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
111.7 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
180.6 |
|
Trade name and trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
Non-compete agreement with Huawei |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
Distributor agreements |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
114.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
298.2 |
|
Amortization prior to the 2006 acquisition |
|
|
(65.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangible assets |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
298.2 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
409.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
890.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets include amounts recognized for the fair value of existing technology,
maintenance agreements, trade name and trademarks, distributor agreements and non-compete
agreement. These intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of approximately five
years.
In-process research and development (IPR&D) represents incomplete H3C research and development
projects that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use as of
the acquisition dates. Technological feasibility is established when an enterprise has completed
all planning, designing, coding, and testing activities that are necessary to establish that a
product can be produced to meet its design specifications including functions, features, and
technical performance requirements. At the dates of acquisition, H3C had multiple IPR&D efforts
under way for certain current and future product lines. Purchased IPR&D relates primarily to
projects associated with the H3C routers and switch products, which had not yet reached
technological feasibility as of the acquisition date and had no alternative future use.
Of the total purchase price paid in 2007, approximately $148.6 million was allocated to net assets
acquired. Net assets were valued at their respective carrying amounts, which management believes
approximate fair value, except for adjustments to inventory and deferred revenue. Inventory was
adjusted by an increase of $11.1 million in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 2, 2007, to
adjust inventory to the actual fair value less direct selling expense. Deferred revenues were
reduced by $0.5 million in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 2, 2007, to adjust deferred
revenue to the estimated cost plus an appropriate profit margin to perform the support and
maintenance services.
Approximately $298.2 million of the 2007 purchase price was allocated to acquired identifiable
intangible assets. Existing core technology is comprised of products that have reached
technological feasibility, which includes most of H3Cs technology. The remainder of intangible
assets is associated with maintenance agreements, trademarks, and non-compete agreements. One day
worth of the amortization expense related to the amortizable intangible assets was reflected in the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended June 2, 2007.
Of the total 2007 purchase price, approximately $409.9 million was allocated to goodwill. Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired.
Goodwill amounts are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment at least annually. In the
event that we determine that the value of the goodwill has become impaired, an accounting charge
for the amount of the impairment will be incurred in the quarter in which such determination is
made.
62
Pro forma Results of Operations
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the consolidated results of
operations of 3Com and H3C as if the acquisition of 100 percent of H3C had occurred as of the
beginning of the periods presented below. Adjustments, which reflect the amortization of
purchased intangible assets, in-process research and development and charges to cost of sales for
inventory write-ups, have been made to the consolidated results of operations. We also eliminate
the inter-company activity between the parties in the consolidated results. The unaudited
proforma financial information is not intended, and should not be taken as representative of our
future consolidated results of operations or financial condition or the results that would have
occurred had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,267.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,146.8 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
Our 2006 consolidated statements of cash flows reflect $110.4 million of the line item businesses
acquired in purchase transactions, net of cash acquired. This reflects acquired cash of $138.4
million on January 31, 2006 offset by the purchase price payment of $28.0 million for an additional
2 percent ownership of H3C.
Roving Planet Acquisition
On December 5, 2006, we acquired certain assets and liabilities of Roving Planet, Inc.
(Roving Planet) to support our strategy of extending our appliance-based intrusion prevention
system (IPS) business to include network access control (NAC) features. Under the terms of the
definitive agreement we acquired the Roving Planet assets for $8.0 million in cash, plus
assumption of liabilities of approximately $0.2 million.
Based upon the use of established valuation techniques we assigned the purchase price
for the acquisition in the following manner (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Useful Life for |
|
|
|
Preliminary Purchase |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
Price Allocation |
|
|
Intangible Assets |
|
In-process research and development |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased core technology |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3 years |
Goodwill |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition value |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4: Restructuring Charges
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure.
In fiscal 2001, we began a broad restructuring of our business to enhance the focus and cost
effectiveness of our business units in serving their respective markets. These restructuring
efforts continued through fiscal 2008. We took the following specific actions in fiscal 2001
through 2008 (the Fiscal 2001 2008 Actions):
|
§
|
|
reduced our workforce; and |
|
|
§ |
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities. |
Restructuring charges related to these various initiatives were $4.5 million in fiscal 2008, $3.5
million in fiscal 2007, and $14.4 million in fiscal 2006. Such charges were net of credits of $0.5
million in fiscal 2008, $13.3 million in fiscal 2007, and $0.1 million in fiscal 2006, related
primarily to revisions of previous estimates of employee separation expenses, lease obligation
costs and values on held for sale properties.
Accrued liabilities associated with restructuring charges are included in the caption Accrued
liabilities and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These liabilities are
classified as current because we expect to satisfy such liabilities in cash within the next 12
months.
63
Fiscal 2008 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2008 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(3,598 |
) |
|
|
(3,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees primarily involved in research and development. Through
May 31, 2008, the total reduction in workforce associated with actions initiated during fiscal 2008 included
approximately 144 employees who had been separated or were currently in the separation process and approximately 23 additional
employees who had been notified but had not yet worked their last day.
We believe that all remaining actions will be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.
Fiscal 2007 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2007 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
12,134 |
|
|
|
(7,501 |
) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(10,804 |
) |
|
|
7,765 |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(3,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The
reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and development, sales and
marketing, customer support,
and general and administrative functions. Through May 31, 2008, the total reduction in workforce
associated with actions
initiated during fiscal 2007 included 233 employees. Non-cash charges include depreciation against
restructured assets as
well as changes in management estimates, as applicable.
We believe that all remaining actions will be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.
64
Fiscal 2006 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2006 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
9,558 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
11,193 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
(5,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,877 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(824 |
) |
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(4,189 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(4,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and
development, sales and marketing, customer support, and general and administrative functions.
Through May 31, 2008, the total reduction in workforce associated with actions initiated during
fiscal 2006 included approximately 227 employees who had been separated or were currently in the
separation process. Non-cash charges include depreciation against restructured assets as well as
changes in management estimates, as applicable.
Fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 restructuring
actions are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Write-downs |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
8,205 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
9,129 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
17,607 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(4,129 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(13,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7,757 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,383 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reductions in workforce affected employees involved in sales, customer support, product
development, and general and administrative positions. As of May 31, 2008 there are two employees
who have been notified but have not yet worked their last day.
65
Facilities-related charges included accelerated depreciation of buildings, write-downs of land and
buildings held for sale, losses on sales of facilities, and lease obligations.
Other restructuring costs included payments to suppliers and contract termination fees.
Non-cash charges include depreciation against restructured assets as
well as changes in management estimates, as applicable.
We believe that the all remaining actions will be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.
Note 5: Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
As described in Note 3, in 2003 we formed a joint venture (H3C) with a subsidiary of Huawei
Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei).
Prior to acquiring majority ownership on January 27, 2006, we accounted for our investment by the
equity method. Under this method, we recorded our proportionate share of H3Cs net income or loss
based on the most recently available quarterly financial statements. Since H3C follows a calendar
year basis of reporting, we reported our equity in H3Cs net income or loss for H3Cs fiscal period
from April 1, 2005 through January 31, 2006 for the fiscal year 2006, and H3Cs April 1, 2004
through March 31, 2005 period for the fiscal year 2005 in our results of operations for fiscal 2006
and 2005. This represents reporting two months in arrears.
Summarized information from the statement of operations for H3C for the ten month period ended
January 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
399,612 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
181,553 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
10,132 |
|
Net income |
|
|
22,487 |
|
In determining our share of the net income or loss of H3C certain adjustments were made to H3Cs
reported results. These adjustments were made primarily to recognize the value and the related
amortization expense associated with Huaweis contributed assets, as well as to defer H3Cs sales
and gross profit on sales of products sold to us that remained in our inventory at the end of the
accounting period. We recorded our equity interest in income of $11.0 million in fiscal 2006
(prior to the acquisition of majority ownership on January 27, 2006) for the period April 1, 2005
through January 31, 2006 in our results of operations under the caption Equity interest in income
of unconsolidated joint venture.
3Com and H3C are parties to agreements for the sale of certain products between the two companies.
During the ten months ended January 31, 2006 we recorded sales to H3C of approximately $10.6
million and made purchases of approximately $53.8 million. Following our obtaining control in
January 2006 and our commencement of consolidation of H3C, such transactions are eliminated in the
preparation on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 6: Investments
Available-for-sale securities consist of (in thousands):
We held no available-for-sale securities at May 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The total cost and carrying value of corporate equity securities consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
Publicly traded corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly
traded corporate equity securities are included in other current
assets.
The following table provides gross realized gains and losses related to our investments (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
|
$ |
5,499 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
4,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7: Inventories
Inventories consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
62,055 |
|
|
$ |
61,857 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
22,657 |
|
|
|
38,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
90,831 |
|
|
$ |
107,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8: Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, consists of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
196,933 |
|
|
|
231,886 |
|
Software |
|
|
25,988 |
|
|
|
31,387 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
|
20,217 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
23,390 |
|
|
|
17,201 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
8,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
260,149 |
|
|
|
311,014 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(205,835 |
) |
|
|
(234,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
54,314 |
|
|
$ |
76,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
Significant property and equipment transactions
We continue to carry the Hemel Hempstead land, which was damaged in December of 2005, as held for
use on our balance sheet. Based on the size of the experienced damage, our insurance policy
administrator paid us a reimbursement value of approximately $28 million in fiscal 2007.
Furthermore, with no feasible business necessity to keep this property, we are soliciting offers
from prospective buyers to acquire the building and land. Any sale would be contingent on UK
government agencies allowing reconstruction of the building. We believe this process will take more
than one year and as a result we have kept the land classified as held for use.
In the first fiscal quarter of 2007 we received $16.0 million of proceeds from completion of the
sale of our former Santa Clara facility.
Note 9: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We completed the annual testing of goodwill for impairment as of February 28, 2008, the end of our
third fiscal quarter, concluding that intangible assets and goodwill for any of our businesses were
not impaired. However, in mid-March 2008, subsequent to the end of the third fiscal quarter, a
significant reduction in our market value occurred. As a result, we concluded that we needed to
evaluate whether an impairment in the fair value of our reporting units had occurred subsequent to
our annual test.
As a result of these triggering events, we tested goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets related to our H3C and TippingPoint reporting units for impairment as of April 25, 2008. We
determined the value of the H3C and TippingPoint reporting units using the assistance of a third party
valuation specialist. The fair value of the reporting units was considered using both an income approach and
market approach. Based on the results of our appraisal and valuation activities H3Cs fair value
was greater than its carrying value and no other action was deemed necessary related to H3C. Based
on the results of our appraisal and valuation activities, the TippingPoint reporting units fair
value was determined to be below its carrying value. We then determined the implied fair value of
goodwill by determining the fair value of all the assets and
liabilities of the TippingPoint reporting
unit. As a result of this process, we determined that the fair value of goodwill for the
TippingPoint reporting unit was $153.4 million. The carrying value of the TippingPoint goodwill was $311.4
million, resulting in an impairment charge of
$158.0 million. Our other long-lived assets within the H3C
and TippingPoint asset groups were also
tested for impairment due to theses triggering events, concluding that the assets are recoverable
from their projected cash flows.
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill related to TippingPoint reporting unit (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance May 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
311,380 |
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
(157,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
153,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist of (in thousands, except for weighted average remaining life):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Existing technology |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
380,254 |
|
|
$ |
(198,682 |
) |
|
$ |
181,572 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
387,233 |
|
|
$ |
(148,641 |
) |
|
$ |
238,592 |
|
Trademark |
|
NA |
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
55,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,500 |
|
Huawei non-compete |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
33,650 |
|
|
|
(22,072 |
) |
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
32,939 |
|
OEM agreement |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
24,844 |
|
|
|
(7,947 |
) |
|
|
16,897 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
23,778 |
|
Maintenance agreements |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(10,556 |
) |
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
|
|
11,611 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
22,176 |
|
|
|
(17,784 |
) |
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
(13,055 |
) |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
535,426 |
|
|
$ |
(257,041 |
) |
|
$ |
278,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,457 |
|
|
$ |
(169,168 |
) |
|
$ |
371,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
During fiscal 2008 we wrote off a $15.6 million fully amortized existing technology intangible
asset related to our connectivity business. Since the products associated with the connectivity
business are near the end of the product life cycle, we have concluded that the asset does not
provide any future benefit. Additionally, in fiscal 2008 our gross intangible assets increased by
$10.5 million due to the appreciation on the Renminbi affecting the value of certain intangible
assets tied to our Chinese business. These intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of
approximately four years.
During fiscal 2007, we recorded approximately $298.2 million and $3.1 million of intangible assets
related to the H3C acquisition and the Roving Planet acquisition, respectively (See Note 3). These
amounts were recognized for the fair value of existing technology, maintenance agreements, trade
name and trademarks, distributor agreements and non-competition agreements. These intangible
assets have a weighted-average useful life of approximately four years.
During fiscal 2007, we reclassed $0.9 million of goodwill that no longer has an indefinite life to
intangible assets.
Annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be as follows for each of
the following five succeeding fiscal years (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
85,033 |
|
|
$ |
60,337 |
|
|
$ |
36,700 |
|
|
$ |
15,163 |
|
|
$ |
15,121 |
|
Note 10: Accrued Liabilities and Other
Accrued liabilities and other consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses |
|
$ |
103,421 |
|
|
$ |
81,791 |
|
Accrued rebates and other marketing |
|
|
65,900 |
|
|
|
67,446 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
66,844 |
|
|
|
54,034 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
36,897 |
|
|
|
40,596 |
|
EARP Accrual |
|
|
34,535 |
|
|
|
94,563 |
|
Advances from customers |
|
|
31,084 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
Income and other taxes payable |
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
36,365 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
Other |
|
|
20,966 |
|
|
|
49,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
366,181 |
|
|
$ |
435,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11: Accrued Warranty and Other Guarantees
Most
products are sold with varying lengths of limited warranty ranging from 90 days to lifetime.
Allowances for estimated warranty obligations are recorded in the period of sale, based on
historical experience related to product failure rates and actual warranty costs incurred during
the applicable warranty period and are recorded as part of cost of goods sold. Also, on an ongoing
basis, we assess the adequacy of our allowances related to warranty obligations recorded in
previous periods and may adjust the balances to reflect actual experience or changes in future
expectations.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated warranty costs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accrued warranty, beginning of period |
|
$ |
40,596 |
|
|
$ |
41,791 |
|
|
$ |
41,782 |
|
Cost of warranty claims |
|
|
(37,688 |
) |
|
|
(46,950 |
) |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
Accrual for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
33,989 |
|
|
|
46,406 |
|
|
|
28,424 |
|
Adjustments to preexisting warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserves related to H3C at date of 2 percent acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty, end of period |
|
$ |
36,897 |
|
|
$ |
40,596 |
|
|
$ |
41,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
Note 12: Long-Term Debt
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
original credit agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term
loan in two tranches (Tranche A and Tranche B) to finance a portion of the purchase price for
3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C.
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28, and commenced on
September 28, 2007. The applicable LIBOR rate at year end was 2.63% and, based on the
credit spread mandated by the Credit Agreement, the effective interest rate for Tranche A is 4.38%
and the effective interest rate for Tranche B is 5.63%. All interest
expense on the debt is related to our H3C segment.
As of May 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
During fiscal 2008 we made a principal payment of $94.0 million. We also made a voluntary
prepayment of $35.0 million due to excess cash flows from our H3C segment in an amount we believe
will be otherwise required to be prepaid in September 2008 under the mandatory annual excess cash
flow prepayment provision of the credit agreement.
Remaining payments of the $301 million principal are due as follows on September 28, for fiscal
years ending May 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche A |
|
|
Tranche B |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
Note 13: Borrowing Arrangements and Commitments
We provide collateral for standby letters of credit, guarantees and similar arrangements generally
given to support commercial transactions and government tax requirements. As of May 31, 2008, these
facilities were backed by collateral of $6.9 million provided to the respective banks.
We lease certain of our facilities under operating leases. Leases expire at various dates from
2009 to 2013, and certain leases have renewal options with rentals based upon changes in the
Consumer Price Index or the fair market rental value of the property. We also sublet certain of
our leased facilities to third party tenants. The sublease agreements expire at various dates from
2009 to 2011.
Future operating lease commitments and future rental income as of May 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Lease |
|
|
Future Rental |
|
Fiscal year |
|
Payments |
|
|
Income |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
35,002 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
2010 |
|
|
21,021 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
2011 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2012 |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
57,178 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was approximately $32.8 million in fiscal 2008, $27.7 million in fiscal 2007, and
$16.3 million in fiscal 2006. Rental income, which includes rents received for both owned and
leased property, was $0.8 million in fiscal 2008, $5.5 million in fiscal 2007, and $6.8 million in
fiscal 2006, and is recorded as an offset to operating expenses.
70
We have entered into purchase agreements with our contract manufacturers. As of May 30, 2008 we had
purchase commitments of $65.4 million.
In September 2006 we sold all of our remaining venture portfolio investments and generated cash of
approximately $1.3 million with a loss on sale of investments of $0.7 million. In August 2006, we
sold certain limited partnership interests and generated cash of approximately $17.0 million with a
gain on sale of investment of $2.4 million and eliminated our future capital call requirements.
Note 14: Stock Based Compensation Plans
Stock
Based Compensation. To determine the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares,
in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), we
use the Black-Scholes option pricing model and apply the single-option valuation approach to the
stock option valuation. In order to determine the fair value of restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units we use the closing market price of 3Com common stock on the date of grant.
For time-vested awards, we recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period of the awards for options granted following the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R). We recognize compensation expense for performance based restricted stock in the fiscal
quarter when an event occurs that makes the probability more than likely that the performance
metric will be achieved. For unvested stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2006, the date we
adopted the fair value method of accounting, we continue to recognize stock-based compensation
expense using the accelerated amortization method prescribed in FASB Interpretation No. 28,
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.
Estimates of the fair value of equity awards in future periods will be affected by the market price
of our common stock, as well as the actual results of certain assumptions used to value the equity
awards. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the expected volatility of the common
stock price, the expected term of options granted, and the risk free interest rate.
We estimate the expected
option term by analyzing the historical term period from grant to exercise and also consider the
expected term for those options that are still outstanding. Options generally vest on an annual basis
over a period of two to four years and have a term of seven years from the date of grant. The expected term of employee stock
purchase plan shares is the average of the remaining purchase periods under each offering period. The expected volatility of the common stock is estimated using
the historical volatility. We believe that historical volatility represents the best information
currently available for projecting future volatility. The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model is based on the
historical U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond issues with terms corresponding to the expected lives of
the equity awards. In addition, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option valuation
model because we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In accordance
with SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those
estimates in subsequent periods based upon new information. In order to determine an estimated
pre-vesting option forfeiture rate, we used historical forfeiture data, which currently yields an
expected forfeiture rate of 27 percent. An estimated forfeiture rate has been applied to all
unvested options and restricted stock outstanding as of May 31, 2006 and to all options, restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units granted since May 31, 2006. Therefore, stock-based
compensation expense is recorded only for those options, restricted stock awards and restricted
stock units that are expected to vest.
The Companys policy is to issue new shares, or reissue shares from treasury stock, upon settlement
of share based payments.
The following table summarizes the effects of the share-based compensation expense resulting from
the application of SFAS No. 123(R) to the stock options, restricted stock and employee stock
purchase plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
2,134 |
|
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
5,756 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
4,621 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
$ |
25,207 |
|
|
$ |
20,095 |
|
|
|
|
71
As of May 31, 2008, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense relating to unvested
employee stock options, restricted stock (awards and units) and employee stock purchase plan,
adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was $18.0 million, $23.1 million and $0.6 million,
respectively. These amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5
years for stock options, 2.2 years for restricted stock awards, 1.8 years for restricted stock
units and 0.3 years for employee stock purchase plan. If actual forfeitures differ from current
estimates, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes
in estimated forfeitures.
Prior to June 1, 2006, we accounted for stock options using the intrinsic value method, pursuant to
the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25. Under this method, stock-based
compensation expense was measured as the difference between the options exercise price and the
market price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
Pro forma information required under SFAS No. 123 for fiscal year 2006, as if we had applied the
fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to awards granted under our equity incentive
plans, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
Net loss as reported |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation included in reported net loss |
|
|
9,863 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation determined under the
fair value-based method, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(25,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net loss |
|
$ |
(116,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share-basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
Adjusted |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation
models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. The underlying weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model and the
resulting estimates of fair value per share were as follows for options granted during the years
ended May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
20061 |
Employee stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
68.6 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Assumptions used in the calculation of fair value according to the provisions of SFAS No. 123. |
72
Stock Options. As of May 31, 2008, our outstanding stock options as a percentage of outstanding shares were
approximately 11 percent. Stock option detail activity was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2005 |
|
|
63,359 |
|
|
$ |
5.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
21,974 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,467 |
) |
|
|
2.07 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(18,445 |
) |
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2006 |
|
|
61,421 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
24,285 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
3.00 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(30,899 |
) |
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2007 |
|
|
52,280 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
2.11 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(12,894 |
) |
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2008 |
|
|
43,925 |
|
|
$ |
4.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2008, there were approximately 28.6 million options exercisable with a
weighted-average exercise price of $5.65 per share. By comparison, there were approximately 22.2
million options exercisable as of May 31, 2007 with a weighted-average price of $6.20 per share.
During the year ended May 31, 2008 approximately 1.8 million options were exercised at an aggregate
intrinsic value of $4.6 million. The exercised intrinsic value above is calculated as the difference between
the market value on exercise date and the option price of the shares. The closing market value per
share as of May 30, 2008, the last trading day of the fiscal year, was $2.52 as reported by The
NASDAQ Global Select Market. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options
exercisable as of May 31, 2008 was $2.8 million. The
aggregate options outstanding and options exercisable intrinsic value is calculated as
the difference between the market value as of May 30, 2008 and the option price of the shares.
Options outstanding that are vested and expected to vest as of May 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number of |
|
Option |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Life (in years) |
|
(in thousands) |
Vested and expected to vest at May 31, 2008 |
|
|
38,562,756 |
|
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
$ |
2,805 |
|
73
Restricted
Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards activity was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
4.07 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
4.13 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
4.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended May 31, 2008 approximately 1.1 million restricted award shares with an
aggregate fair value of $3.7 million became vested.
Restricted
Stock Units. Restricted stock unit activity was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
Outstanding June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
4,356 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(836 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding May 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
5,738 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended May 31, 2008 approximately 2.2 million restricted share units with an
aggregate fair value of $7.0 million became vested. On
June 3, 2008 the Company granted to our new
Chief Executive Officer 1.5 million restricted stock units having an aggregate fair value of $3.7
million.
2003
Stock Plan Description. In September 2003, our stockholders
approved the 2003 Stock Plan which replaced all previous stock plans
and the shares available for future grants under those prior plans.
The 2003 Stock Plan provides for the issuance of non-qualified stock
options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted
stock units, and stock appreciation rights to eligible employees,
consultants and directors. In accordance with the 2003 Stock Plan,
stock options are generally granted at not less than fair market
value, have a seven year term and vest over a period of two to four
years. Additionally, restricted stock awards and units are generally
granted at no cost to the recipient and vest over a period of two to
four years. To date, we have not granted any stock appreciation
rights under the plan. Upon approval of the 2003 Stock Plan,
20 million shares were reserved for issuance. In September 2005,
our stockholders authorized an additional 30 million shares.
As of
May 31, 2008, shares of common stock issuable pursuant to
outstanding awards granted under the 2003 Stock Plan, our previous
stock plans, and options assumed by us in connection with
acquisitions were 49.7 million shares and there were
11.5 million shares reserved for future grants.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) under which eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to ten percent of their compensation, as defined,
to purchase common stock at a price of 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value as of the
beginning or the end of the six-month offering period. In September 2003, our stockholders
approved an increase of five million shares available for issuance under the ESPP. We recognized
$1.5 million of ESPP stock-based compensation expense in the year ended May 31, 2008. Shares issued
under the plan in fiscal 2008 and 2007 were 1.8 million and
1.4 million, respectively. Employee stock purchases generally
occur only in the quarters ended November 30 and May 31.
74
Stock Reserved for Issuance. As of May 31, 2008 we had reserved common stock for issuance as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and restricted stock plans for granted shares |
|
|
49,669 |
|
Stock option and restricted stock plans for future grants |
|
|
11,500 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares reserved for issuance |
|
|
62,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares Rights Plan. In September 1989, the Board of Directors approved a common stock
purchase rights plan, which was amended and restated in December 1994, and again in March 2001.
In November 2002, the Board of Directors approved a Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Plan (the Preferred Shares Rights Plan), which replaced the March 2001 Plan. In September
2007, the Board amended the Preferred Shares Rights Plan in connection with 3Coms now-terminated
proposed acquisition by an affiliate of Bain Capital Partners. The Preferred Shares Rights Plan
provides that the preferred share rights (the Rights) will become exercisable only following the
acquisition by a person or a group of 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock or ten
days following the announcement of a tender or exchange offer for 15 percent or more of the
outstanding common stock (the Distribution Date). After the Distribution Date, each Right will
entitle the holder to purchase for $55.00 (the Exercise Price), one-one thousandth of a share of
our Series A Participating Preferred Stock (or cash, stock or other assets approved by the Board
of Directors) with economic terms similar to that of one share of our common stock. Upon a person
or a group acquiring 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock, each Right will allow the
holder (other than the acquirer) to purchase common stock or securities of 3Com having a then
current market value of two times the Exercise Price of the Right. In the event that following
the acquisition of 15 percent of the common stock by an acquirer, we are acquired in a merger or
other business combination or 50 percent or more of our assets or earning power is sold, each
Right will entitle the holder to purchase for the Exercise Price, common stock or securities of
the acquirer having a then current market value of two times the Exercise Price. In certain
circumstances, the Rights may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $0.001 per Right. If not
earlier exchanged or redeemed, the Rights will expire on March 8, 2011.
Note 15: Financial Instruments
The following summary disclosures concerning our financial instruments are made in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which
requires the disclosure of fair value information about both on- and off-balance sheet financial
instruments where it is practicable to estimate the value. Fair value is defined in SFAS No. 107
as the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing
parties, rather than in a forced or liquidation sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values of financial
instruments:
Cash and equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash
and equivalents approximate their estimated fair values.
Corporate equity securities. Fair value of publicly traded corporate equity securities is based
on quoted market prices. Fair value of privately held corporate equity securities is based on all
available information. For these non-quoted investments, our policy is to regularly review the
assumptions underlying the financial performance of the privately held companies in which the
investments are maintained. If and when a determination is made that a decline in fair value
below the cost basis is other than temporary, the related investment is written down to its
estimated fair value.
Foreign exchange contracts. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain
balance sheet exposures and intercompany balances against future movements in foreign exchange
rates. In addition, we enter into foreign exchange
75
forward contracts to hedge exposures related to anticipated foreign currency cash flows other than
in China. We do not use foreign forward exchange contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
Our foreign exchange forward contracts require the exchange of foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars
or vice versa, and generally mature in one month or less. We had outstanding foreign exchange
forward contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $43.6 million as of May 31, 2008 and $42.8
million as of May 31, 2007, that had remaining maturities of one month or less. The fair value of
foreign exchange forward contracts is based on prevailing financial market information. The
carrying amounts, which were also the estimated fair values, of foreign exchange forward contracts
were not significant as of May 31, 2007 and 2006. See Note 2 for information concerning our
significant accounting policies for foreign exchange forward contracts.
Because SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from
its disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented in the table
above would not necessarily represent the underlying value of all of our financial instruments.
Note 16: Interest (expense) and Other Income, Net
Interest (expense) and other income, net, consists of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
$ |
41,310 |
|
|
$ |
29,297 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(15,770 |
) |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
(13,087 |
) |
|
$ |
40,863 |
|
|
$ |
29,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
44,364 |
|
|
$ |
38,291 |
|
|
$ |
8,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net includes $45.7 million, $30.6 million and $7.3 million in fiscal year 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively, of other income from H3C for an operating subsidy program by the Chinese
VAT authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT taxes collected by H3C from purchasers of
software products. Other income also includes a gain from the insurance proceeds from our Hemel
facility in fiscal 2007.
Note 17: Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
|
|
(14,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
20,170 |
|
|
|
(14,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
(5,945 |
) |
|
|
(9,997 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
(5,945 |
) |
|
|
(9,997 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,903 |
) |
|
$ |
10,173 |
|
|
$ |
(14,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
The components of net deferred tax assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
Gross deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
1,061,779 |
|
|
$ |
1,003,569 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
40,722 |
|
|
|
33,478 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
55,708 |
|
|
|
55,618 |
|
Capital loss carryforwards |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
25,828 |
|
Reserves recognized in different periods for tax purposes |
|
|
64,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty and purchased research and development |
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
Other |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,240,379 |
|
|
|
1,123,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves recognized in different periods for tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144,486 |
) |
Acquired intangibles |
|
|
(38,427 |
) |
|
|
(59,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(38,427 |
) |
|
|
(203,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(1,210,771 |
) |
|
|
(937,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(8,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of both May 31, 2008 and 2007, related to the acquisition of
H3C, TippingPoint and Roving Planet, include the tax effect of temporary differences and tax
attributes related to these acquisitions. A valuation allowance was recorded as the realization of
the TippingPoint and Roving Planet deferred tax assets was uncertain so that the impact on the net
deferred tax assets was zero. We incurred a revaluation in our
deferred assets and liabilities relating to our H3C subsidiary in
China. The net effect of these revaluations was an increase in our
tax provision for fiscal 2008 of $6.1 million.
We have net operating loss carryforwards related to the following income tax jurisdictions and
expiration periods: U.S. federal loss carryforwards of approximately $2.6 billion expiring between
fiscal years 2009 and 2028, substantially all of which expire between fiscal years 2021 and 2028;
various state loss carryforwards of approximately $1.2 billion expiring between 2009 and 2028; and
various foreign loss carryforwards with $2.9 million expiring between 2014 and 2018, and $319.0
million with an unlimited carryforward period. We also have federal capital loss carryforwards of
$29.0 million expiring between fiscal years 2009 and 2012 and foreign capital loss carryforwards of
$22.4 million with an unlimited carryforward period; a U.S. federal research credit carryforward of
$25.6 million expiring between 2013 and 2020; a U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforward of
$4.9 million expiring between 2009 and 2013; and a U.S. federal alternative minimum tax credit
carryforward of $10.7 million that has an unlimited carryforward period.
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance relates to net operating loss and credit
carryforwards and temporary differences for which we believe that realization is uncertain. The
valuation allowance increased $273.7 million in fiscal 2008, decreased $5.7 million in fiscal 2007,
and increased $30.6 million in fiscal 2006. The total valuation allowance of $1,210.8 million
includes $145.7 million attributable to the tax benefit of stock option deductions, which, if
recognized, will be allocated directly to paid-in-capital. In addition, the valuation allowance
includes approximately $59.3 million for acquired net operating loss carryforwards which, if
realized, would result in a decrease in goodwill. The remaining tax
benefits, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate by
$1,005.8 million
77
The provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal
statutory income tax rate to income before taxes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Tax computed at federal statutory rate |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
State income taxes, net of federal effect |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Provision for combined foreign and U.S.
taxes on certain foreign income at rates
greater than U.S. rates |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
H3C
revaluation of deferred assets and liabilities |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
24.1 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit arising from
settlement of foreign tax audit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Non-deductible purchased in-process
technology and merger-related charges |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
(12.8 |
)% |
Loss before income taxes includes foreign income of $38.3 million in fiscal 2008, foreign losses of
$20.0 million in fiscal 2007 and foreign losses of $29.9 million in fiscal 2006. We have not
provided for federal tax on approximately $299.6 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries because we consider these earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign subsidiary
operations.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on June 2, 2007 which
resulted in no adjustment to the beginning of the year retained earnings balance.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized benefits during fiscal 2008 were as
follows (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
benefits as of June 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
31,536 |
|
Increases related to tax positions in prior periods |
|
|
896 |
|
Decreases related to tax positions in prior periods |
|
|
(3,469 |
) |
Increases related to tax positions taken in the current period |
|
|
3,804 |
|
Settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(13,866 |
) |
Lapses of statute of limitations |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
benefits as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
18,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
In
addition to the amounts above at May 31, 2008, we had interest
of $2.5 million, representing an increase of $0.4 million
from the date of adoption. There were accrued no penalties as of May 31,
2008.
As of
May 31, 2008 we had unrecognized tax benefits of
$18.2 million including interest, if
recognized, all of which would affect our effective tax rate. The $18.2 million of unrecognized tax
benefits and interest are recorded in deferred taxes and long-term
obligations on the balance sheet.
We file a consolidated U.S. income tax return and tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions, and our subsidiaries file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. In the
normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout
the world, including such major jurisdictions as China, the United Kingdom and Singapore, as well
as the U.S. With some exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and
local, or non-U.S., income tax examinations for years before 2004.
78
The significant exceptions are as follows. In Singapore we are subject to examination in relation
to transfer pricing and other issues for fiscal years 2003 and 2004. In Hong Kong we are under
examination for fiscal years 2000 to 2002 in relation to an offshore claim in respect of income
from our Asia Pacific Region customer service business. It is possible that these examinations will
be settled within the next twelve months and therefore it is reasonably possible that, as a result
of settlement, there could be a material change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits.
However it is not possible to estimate the amount of the potential change.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 we effectively settled the examination of a Singapore
subsidiarys returns for fiscal years 1999 to 2002, and also an examination of a Netherlands
subsidiarys return for fiscal year 1997. As a result of these settlements, we have recognized
previously unrecognized tax benefits totaling $13.2 million.
We estimate that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $0.9
million over the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of various statutes.
During fiscal year 2006, we settled a tax audit with a foreign tax authority regarding issues
covering multiple years. This transaction resulted in the release of $24.3 million of our tax
reserves which were previously reported under the caption Accrued liabilities and other on our
balance sheet. The release of the reserves resulted in the following amounts being included in
the statement of operations; a tax benefit of $23.0 million included in the caption Income tax
benefit and a related foreign exchange gain of $1.3 million included in the caption Other income
(expense), net.
Note 18: Net Loss per Share
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(228,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(88,589 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares Basic |
|
|
399,524 |
|
|
|
393,894 |
|
|
|
386,801 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares Diluted |
|
|
399,524 |
|
|
|
393,894 |
|
|
|
386,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per
share Basic and Diluted
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and restricted stock totaling 52.8 million shares in fiscal 2008, 57.8
million shares in fiscal 2007 and 63.1 million shares in fiscal 2006, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share as the net loss for these periods would have made their
effect anti-dilutive.
79
Note 19: Segment Information
Based on the information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of
making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance, we review the operations of
the business by looking at four reportable segments. In prior fiscal years we reported two
segments, SCN and H3C. In fiscal 2008, we realigned our internal reporting and, as a result, we
have changed our segment reporting to be in line with the way we are now internally managing our
business. This change breaks-out the SCN segment into the Data and Voice business unit (DVBU),
our TippingPoint security division (TippingPoint) and corporate expenses (Corporate). Amounts
for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 have been recast to conform to the current management view. We do
not use any allocation methods to distribute these corporate expenses to our operating business
units.
Management evaluates segment performance based on segment revenue, gross profit, operating expense
and operating income (loss), excluding certain corporate level costs, stock-based compensation,
amortization of acquired intangible assets, and the impairment charge recorded in 2008.
Summarized financial information of our results of operations by segment for the fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
$ |
551,012 |
|
|
$ |
104,101 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(132,547 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
1,294,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
425,394 |
|
|
|
172,384 |
|
|
|
70,197 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,310 |
) |
|
|
c |
|
|
|
654,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense |
|
|
283,383 |
|
|
|
198,198 |
|
|
|
70,693 |
|
|
|
45,878 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
319,784 |
|
|
|
d,e |
|
|
|
917,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss) |
|
$ |
142,011 |
|
|
$ |
(25,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(496 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(333,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(263,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
731,131 |
|
|
$ |
552,640 |
|
|
$ |
90,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(106,468 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
1,267,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
344,987 |
|
|
|
181,713 |
|
|
|
60,307 |
|
|
|
(1,196 |
) |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
(7,357 |
) |
|
|
c |
|
|
|
578,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense |
|
|
240,085 |
|
|
|
204,003 |
|
|
|
70,750 |
|
|
|
44,254 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
151,883 |
|
|
|
d,e |
|
|
|
710,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss) |
|
$ |
104,902 |
|
|
$ |
(22,290 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,443 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(159,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(132,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
|
DVBU |
|
|
Point |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
108,290 |
|
|
$ |
634,294 |
|
|
$ |
71,045 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
51,437 |
|
|
|
226,452 |
|
|
|
50,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense |
|
|
30,204 |
|
|
|
288,027 |
|
|
|
66,122 |
|
|
|
56,046 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
44,768 |
|
|
|
d,e |
|
|
|
485,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss) |
|
$ |
21,233 |
|
|
$ |
(61,575 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,947 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(44,768 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(157,103 |
) |
|
|
|
a |
|
Represents eliminations for
inter-company revenue during the respective periods. We recognize
sales between our segments on the basis of cost plus a reasonable
profit. |
80
|
|
|
b |
|
Represents costs not directly attributable to any operating business segment.
|
|
c |
|
Includes stock based compensation in all periods plus purchase accounting inventory related
adjustments as applicable. |
|
d |
|
Includes amortization and restructuring in all periods and stock-based compensation,
acquisition related expenses, and goodwill impairment, as applicable. |
|
e |
|
Contained in eliminations and other for all years
presented are; restructuring expenses that relate to both the DVBU
and Corporate segments, as we do not allocate restructuring between
the segments in our CODM reporting, as well as amortization expenses
that relate to the H3C, Tipping Point and DVBU segments where
applicable. Contained in eliminations and other in fiscal 2008 is a
goodwill impairment charge that relates to the TippingPoint segment,
that was recorded in the fourth quarter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3C |
|
$ |
1,276,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,199 |
|
DVBU/Corporate (1) |
|
|
908,944 |
|
|
|
1,014,577 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
231,277 |
|
|
|
393,637 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(641,923 |
) |
|
|
(651,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,775,130 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
3Com reviews assets based on the total of our DVBU and Corporate segments and does not
allocate between the two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures for additions to property, equipment |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3C |
|
$ |
8,191 |
|
|
$ |
16,645 |
|
DVBU/Corporate (1) |
|
|
6,448 |
|
|
|
6,142 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,893 |
|
|
$ |
28,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
3Com reviews total expenditures for additions to property, plant and equipment based on
the total of our DVBU and Corporate segments and does not allocate between the two. |
Certain product groups accounted for a significant portion of our sales. Sales from these product
groups as a percentage of total sales for the past three fiscal years were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
1,058,465 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,028,090 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
$ |
577,038 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
% |
Security |
|
|
133,445 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
120,053 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
88,012 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Voice |
|
|
60,696 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
68,033 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
56,632 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Services |
|
|
39,583 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
35,871 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
33,357 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Legacy connectivity products |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
15,434 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
39,768 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,294,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,267,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales from significant customers as a percentage of total consolidated sales for the past three
fiscal years were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
Customer |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Huawei Technologies Co. |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Ingram Micro, Inc. |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Tech Data (1) |
|
|
|
* |
| |
|
* |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Customer did not meet the 10 percent threshold in fiscal 2008 and 2007 |
Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. (a customer of our H3C segment and the former minority shareholder of
H3C) represented approximately 28 percent of our accounts receivable balance as of May 31, 2008,
compared to 20 percent for the previous year. Ingram Micro, Inc (a customer of our DVBU segment)
represented approximately 27 percent of our accounts receivable balance as of May 31, 2008,
compared to 24 percent for the previous fiscal year.
81
Note 20: Geographical Information
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31, |
|
Sales |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
China |
|
$ |
609,498 |
|
|
$ |
587,044 |
|
|
$ |
84,170 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
292,339 |
|
|
|
272,826 |
|
|
|
298,545 |
|
North America |
|
|
202,205 |
|
|
|
233,691 |
|
|
|
248,532 |
|
Asia Pacific excluding China |
|
|
106,820 |
|
|
|
103,501 |
|
|
|
91,396 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
84,017 |
|
|
|
70,419 |
|
|
|
72,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,294,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,481 |
|
|
$ |
794,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography is reported based on the customers designated delivery point, or in
the case of H3Cs OEM customers, the OEMs designated hub delivery location.
The growth in our international operations has increased our exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations. Primary currencies of our revenue are U.S. dollars and Chinese Renminbi; expenses
include U.S. dollars, Euros, Singapore Dollars, British Pounds, and Chinese Renminbi. The income
statements of our international operations whose functional currencies are the local currencies are
translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent
the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency
denominated transactions results in increased revenues and operating expenses. Conversely, our
revenues and operating expenses will decrease when the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign
currencies.
Property and equipment, net by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Property and equipment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
22,022 |
|
|
$ |
30,104 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
7,843 |
|
China |
|
|
20,436 |
|
|
|
32,070 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
54,314 |
|
|
$ |
76,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment by geography is based on the physical location of the assets at the end of
the fiscal year. As of May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007, property and equipment in the United States,
the United Kingdom and China exceeded ten percent of total property and equipment, as shown in the
table above.
Note 21: Employee Benefit Plan and EARP
We have adopted a plan known as the 3Com 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan) to provide retirement
benefits to domestic employees. As allowed under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, the
401(k) Plan provides tax-deferred salary deductions for eligible employees. Participants may elect
to contribute from one percent to 22 percent of their annual compensation to the 401(k) Plan each
calendar year, limited to a maximum annual amount as set periodically by the Internal Revenue
Service. In addition, the 401(k) Plan provides for contributions as determined by the Board of
Directors. We match 50 percent for each dollar on the first six percent of eligible annual
compensation contributed by the employee. Employees become vested in our matching contributions
according to a three-year vesting schedule based on initial date of hire. Matching contributions
to the 401(k) Plan totaled $1.8 million in fiscal 2008, $1.9 million in fiscal 2007, and $2.2
million in fiscal 2006.
82
The closing of the acquisition of Huaweis remaining interest in H3C in fiscal 2007 triggered a
bonus program for substantially all of H3Cs approximately 4,800 employees. This program, which
was implemented by Huawei and 3Com in a prior period, is called the Equity Appreciation Rights
Plan, or EARP, and funds a bonus pool based upon a percentage of the appreciation in H3Cs value
from the initiation of the program to the time of the closing of the acquisition. A portion of the
program is based on cumulative earnings of H3C. The total value of the EARP is expected to be
approximately $180 million. At May 31, 2007, $57 million of the change-in-control portion of the
EARP and an additional $37 million for fiscal 2007 cumulative earnings was accrued for on the
balance sheet and was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. At May 31, 2008 we accrued $35
million for the fiscal 2008 cumulative earnings which is expected to be paid in the first quarter
of fiscal 2009. H3C expects the unvested portion amounting to $44 million to be accrued in H3Cs
operating results over the next three years serving as a continued retention and incentive program
for employees.
Note 22: Litigation
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are
difficult to predict. We believe that we have meritorious defenses in the matters set forth below
in which we are named as a defendant. An unfavorable resolution of the lawsuits described below
could adversely affect our business, financial position, or results of operations. We cannot
estimate the loss or range of loss that may be reasonably possible as a result of these litigations
and, accordingly, we have not recorded any associated liability in our consolidated balance sheets.
On December 5, 2001, TippingPoint and two of its current and former officers and directors, as well
as the managing underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering, were named as defendants in
a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The lawsuit, which is part of a consolidated action that includes over 300
similar actions, is captioned In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Brian Levey vs.
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., et al. (Civil Action Number 01-CV-10976). The principal
allegation in the lawsuit is that the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate the initial
public offering and subsequent market price of TippingPoints stock (and the stock of other public
companies) by knowingly assisting the underwriters requirement that certain of their customers had
to purchase stock in a specific initial public offering as a condition to being allocated shares in
the initial public offerings of other companies. In relation to TippingPoint, the purported
plaintiff class for the lawsuit is comprised of all persons who purchased TippingPoint stock from
March 17, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The suit seeks rescission of the purchase prices paid by
purchasers of shares of TippingPoint common stock. On September 10, 2002, TippingPoints counsel
and counsel for the plaintiffs entered into an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs
dismissed, without prejudice, TippingPoints former and current officers and directors from the
lawsuit. In May 2003, a memorandum of understanding was executed by counsel for the plaintiffs,
the issuer-defendants and their insurers setting forth the terms of a settlement that would result
in the termination of all claims brought by the plaintiffs against the issuer-defendants and the
individual defendants named in the lawsuit. In August 2003, TippingPoints Board of Directors
approved the settlement terms described in the memorandum of understanding. In May 2004,
TippingPoint signed a settlement agreement on behalf of itself and its current and former directors
and officers with the plaintiffs. This settlement agreement formalizes the previously approved
terms of the memorandum of understanding and, subject to certain conditions, provides for the
complete dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims against TippingPoint and its current and former
directors and officers. Any direct financial impact of the settlement is expected to be borne by
TippingPoints insurers. On August 31, 2005, the District Court issued its preliminary approval of
the settlement terms. The settlement remains subject to numerous conditions, including final
approval by the District Court. On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit held that the District Court erred in granting class-action status to six focus cases of
the consolidated class action lawsuits that comprise the action. The impact of this decision on
the settlement is uncertain. The Plaintiffs petitioned the Second Circuit to hear this case en
banc, but the appeals court rejected the petition. . The matter was referred back to the District
Court and, on May 30, 2007, the Plaintiffs orally moved for certification of the class in the
consolidated class actions. The District Court has not ruled on this motion. If the settlement
does not occur for any reason and the litigation against TippingPoint continues, we intend to
defend this action vigorously, but cannot make any predictions about the outcome. To the extent
necessary, we will seek indemnification and/or contribution from the underwriters in TippingPoints
initial public offering pursuant to its underwriting agreement with the underwriters. However,
there can be no assurance that indemnification or contribution will be available to TippingPoint or
enforceable against the underwriters.
83
On December 22, 2006, Australias Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization (CSIRO) filed
suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division) against
several manufacturers and suppliers of wireless products, including 3Com, seeking money damages and
injunctive relief. CSIRO alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of wireless products
compliant with the IEEE 802.11(a), 802.11(g), or draft 802.11(n) wireless standards infringes on
CSIROs patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,487,069. On March 9, 2007, 3Com filed its Answer, denying
infringement and claiming invalidity and unenforceability of the CSIRO patent, among other
defenses. The case is in the discovery phase of litigation. A Markman hearing, wherein the scope
of CSIROs patent was argued, was held on June 26, 2008. A decision is pending. The majority of
3Coms wireless products are supplied to the Company under OEM Purchase and Development Agreements
that impose substantial intellectual property indemnifications obligations upon 3Coms suppliers.
However, there can be no assurance that indemnification will be available and we cannot make any
predictions as to the outcome of this litigation, but intend to vigorously defend the matter.
Between September 28, 2007 and October 10, 2007, five putative class action complaints were filed
in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in connection with the announcement of the
proposed acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners Fisk v. 3Com
Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3256-VCL; Bendit v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action
No. 3258-VCL; Litvintchouk v. Robert Y.L. Mao, et al., Civil Action No. 3264-VCL; Kadlec v. 3Com
Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3268-VCL; and Kahn v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action
No. 3286-VCL. On October 12, 2007, the above-referenced actions were consolidated for all purposes
and captioned: IN RE: 3COM SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION, Civil Action No. 3256-VCL. An additional two
putative class action complaints were filed in the Superior Court of Middlesex County,
Massachusetts Tansey v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 07-3768, and Davenport v.
Benhamou, et al., Civil Action No. 07-3973F. In light of the termination of the proposed
acquisition of the Company, all of these cases have now been dismissed.
Note 23: Purchased Technology License Impairment Charge
During the closing process for the three months ended February 28, 2006, management decided to
discontinue certain development plans utilizing a purchased technology license for which we did not
have an alternative use. Management believed this decision indicated that the carrying value of the
related asset may have been impaired and that an impairment analysis should be performed. In
performing the analysis for recoverability, management estimated the future cash flows expected to
result from this license. We recorded a $4.2 million impairment charge based on this
recoverability analysis. The impaired asset was fully written off and recorded in research and
development as of February 28, 2006. There were no impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2008 and
2007 other than the goodwill impairment charge, see Note 9 for further details.
Note 24: Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Sales |
|
$ |
319,434 |
|
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
$ |
336,390 |
|
|
$ |
321,254 |
|
|
$ |
300,144 |
|
|
$ |
332,976 |
|
|
$ |
323,441 |
|
|
$ |
310,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
148,936 |
|
|
|
152,120 |
|
|
|
179,674 |
|
|
|
173,725 |
|
|
|
136,429 |
|
|
|
150,151 |
|
|
|
153,437 |
|
|
|
138,437 |
|
Gross profit margin % |
|
|
46.6 |
% |
|
|
47.9 |
% |
|
|
53.4 |
% |
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(25,687 |
) |
|
|
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
(6,066 |
) |
|
|
(190,397 |
) |
|
|
(20,868 |
) |
|
|
(9,380 |
) |
|
|
(8,935 |
) |
|
|
(93,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(18,654 |
) |
|
|
(35,624 |
) |
|
|
(7,840 |
) |
|
|
(166,723 |
) |
|
|
(14,068 |
) |
|
|
(3,516 |
) |
|
|
(4,779 |
) |
|
|
(66,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
84
We acquired majority (51 percent) ownership of Huawei-3Com Co., Ltd. (H3C), a China-based joint
venture, on January 27, 2006 and determined it was then appropriate to consolidate H3Cs results.
For the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 we had minority interest in the calculation of net
income. On March 29, 2007, 3Com Technologies completed its purchase of the remaining 49 percent.
Related to the purchase of the final 49 percent we did not have a minority interest in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2007 and thereafter.
Note 25: Subsequent Event
On July 11, 2008, 3Com Corporation and Realtek Group entered into three agreements that document
the resolution of the patent dispute between the parties and provide for the non-exclusive license
by 3Com to Realtek of certain patents and related network interface technology for license fees
totaling $70 million. On July 18, 2008 we received the first installment payment of $35 million.
The agreement between 3Com and Realtek documents the resolution of the litigation between the
parties and provides for the dismissal of the lawsuit and mutual releases between the parties to be
effective upon satisfaction of the parties obligations under two non-exclusive license agreements,
including the payment by the Realtek Group of the license fees within 45 days.
85
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of May 30, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under the Exchange Act, means controls
and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three months ended May 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our management has
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 30, 2008.
Managements evaluation was based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
(1) |
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our
assets; |
|
|
(2) |
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of our management and board of directors; and |
|
|
(3) |
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on our financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on the COSO criteria and our managements evaluation, our management has concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 30, 2008.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has audited the financial
statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has
audited our internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte &
Touches reports for these audits appear in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on our internal
control over financial reporting. This report appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
86
Important Considerations
The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial
reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in
decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems,
the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may
deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of
disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will be successful
in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to
the appropriate levels of management.
87
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
3Com Corporation
Marlborough, Massachusetts
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of 3Com Corporation (3Com) as of
May 30, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 3Com management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for their assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on 3Coms internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, 3Com maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of May 30, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
and for the year ended May 30, 2008 of 3Com and our report dated July 25, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule, and includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding 3Coms adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(Revised), Share-Based Payment.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 25, 2008
88
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(a) Directors
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Nominees and Other
Directors in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Proxy
Statement).
(b) Executive Officers
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Executive Officers
of the Registrant in Part I of Item I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy Statement.
(d) Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all employees, including our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer and
persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which is available
on our website at http://www.3com.com, complies with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards
of The NASDAQ Global Select Market. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10
of Form 8-K, regarding an amendment to or waiver from our code of ethics, by posting the required
information on our Internet website at http://www.3com.com and will send a paper copy to any
stockholder who submits a request in writing to our Secretary.
(e) Corporate Governance
Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption Corporate
Governance in our Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the sections captioned Executive Compensation, Employment,
Severance and Change-of-Control Arrangements, Director Compensation, Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, Compensation Committee Report and Corporate Governance/Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information appearing under the captions Equity Compensation Plan Information and
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the sections captioned Related Person Transactions and
Corporate Governance in the Proxy Statement.
89
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference
from the information contained in the section captioned Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
)(1) |
|
Financial Statements See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and
Financial Statement Schedule at page 50 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Financial Statement Schedule See Financial Statement Schedule at page 98 of
this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits See Exhibit Index at page 91 of this Form 10-K. |
|
(b) |
|
See Exhibit Index at page 91 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
(c) |
|
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule at page
53 of this Form 10-K. |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.,
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of
December 22, 2006
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
Diamond II Holdings, Inc., Diamond II
Acquisition Corp. and 3Com Corporation,
dated as of September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to
correct an error in the Certificate of
Merger
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on March
23, 2005
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A
Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002 (Rights Plan)
|
|
8-A/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Plan, dated as of
September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
3Com Corporation 1983 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective September
30, 2001*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/11/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, amended and restated as of
June 18, 2008 (subject to shareholder
approval)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
3Com Corporation Director Stock Option
Plan, as amended*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
10/10/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
3Com Corporation Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended July 1, 2001*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
3Com Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated effective April 30,
2002*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, as
amended*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/3/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
January 25, 2006 by and between R. Scott
Murray and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
September 5, 2006 by and between Edgar
Masri and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
July 3, 2007 by and between Jay Zager and
3Com Corporation *
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-144322
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
7/3/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Stand Alone Restricted Stock Agreement
dated July 3, 2007 by and between Jay Zager
and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-144322
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
7/3/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Non-Employee Directors)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003
Stock Plan (Employees)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Form of Performance Accelerated Vesting
Restricted Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Performance Vesting Restricted
Stock Agreement*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement -
Standard 4-Year Vesting*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
(Time-Based Vesting)*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
11/17/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Award
Agreement*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
R. Scott Murray Employment Agreement,
amended and restated as of February 2,
2006, between the registrant and R. Scott
Murray *
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
2/6/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Performance Vesting Restricted Stock
Agreement dated January 25, 2006 by and
between R. Scott Murray and 3Com
Corporation *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Edgar Masri Employment Agreement, dated as
of August 8, 2007, between the registrant
and Edgar
Masri *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
8/9/06 |
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of March
29, 2007, between H3C and Shusheng Zheng*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Offer Letter dated May 9, 2007 between the
Registrant and Jay Zager*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
5/10/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Offer Letter dated June 19, 2004 between
the Registrant and Donald M, Halsted III*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Offer Letter dated September 12, 2003
between the Registrant and Neal D. Goldman*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between
the Registrant and Marc Willebeek-LeMair*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Offer Letter dated April 11, 2006 between
the Registrant and Robert Dechant*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/17/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between
the Registrant and James Hamilton*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Severance Benefits Agreement dated February
28, 2007, between the Registrant and James
Hamilton*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Robert Y. L. Mao Employment Agreement,
dated as of August 7, 2006, between the
registrant and Robert Y. L. Mao*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Robert Y. L. Mao Employment Agreement dated
as of April 29, 2008, between the
registrant and Robert Y. L. Mao*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/30/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Ronald A. Sege Employment Agreement dated
as of April 29, 2008, between the
registrant and Ronald A. Sege *
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/30/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated
May 6, 2008 by and between Ronald A. Sege
and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Stand Alone Restricted Stock Agreement
dated May 6, 2008 by and between Ronald A.
Sege and 3Com Corporation *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Summary of Equity Appreciation Rights Plan
(H3C Technologies)*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer
Severance Plan, amended and restated
effective September 11, 2006 *
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Above Grade Severance Plan effective
September 11, 2006 *
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Form of Severance Benefits Agreement
between the Registrant and each of the
officers or former officers named in our
proxy statement (other than Messrs. Mao,
Sege. Masri and Murray)*
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement
between the Registrant and each of the
following officers or former officers named
in our proxy statement: Messrs. Goldman,
Halsted, Hamilton and Willebeek-LeMair*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement
between the Registrant and the following
officers or former officers named in our
proxy statements: Messrs. Dechant, Zheng
and Zager and future executive officers
other than Messrs. Mao, Sege, Masri and
Murray*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
3Com Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan*
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the
Registrant and its officers and directors
|
|
S-3/A
|
|
333-102591
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Office Lease, dated as of November 26,
2002, by and between Marlborough Campus
Limited Partnership and the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of
November 26, 2002, by and between
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and
the Registrant
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
4/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of July
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
7/22/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease dated as of
December 12, 2005 by and between
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and
3Com Corporation
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease dated as of
October 27, 2006 by and between Bel
Marlborough I LLC and 3Com Corporation
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Agreement for the Lease of Hangzhou Real
Property between Huawei Technologies Co.
Ltd. and Hangzhou Huawei-3Com Technology
Co., Ltd. dated January 1, 2004
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
Shareholders Agreement by and among
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.
Ltd., 3Com Technologies and Huawei-3Com
Co., Ltd. (the Shareholders Agreement)
dated as of November 15, 2003 (Certain
Portions Omitted; Confidential Treatment
Requested)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004
(Certain Potions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders
Agreement dated as of January 27, 2006
(Certain Portions Omitted; Confidential
Treatment Requested)
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited,
as Borrower, 3Com Corporation, 3Com
Holdings Limited and 3Com Technologies, as
Holdco Guarantors, various Lenders, Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Mandated
Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative
Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial
and Commercial Bank of China (Asia)
Limited, as Collateral Agent
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
3/23/07 |
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty
Agreement dated as of May 25, 2007 and
effective as of May 31, 2007 among H3C
Holdings Limited, as Borrower, 3Com
Corporation, 3Com Holdings Limited and 3Com
Technologies, as Holdco Guarantors, H3C
Technologies Co., Limited, as Guarantor,
various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P., as Mandated Lead Arranger,
Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and
Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as
Collateral Agent (the A&R Credit
Agreement)
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
5/25/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
First Amendment to A&R Credit Agreement,
dated as of June 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
Borrower Share Charge dated March 22, 2007
among 3Com Technologies, as Chargor, and
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
Borrower Fixed and Floating Charge dated
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited,
as Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral
Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
Borrower Charge Over Bank Accounts dated
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited,
as Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial
Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral
Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.55 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
H3C Fixed and Floating Charge dated April
3, 2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral
Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
H3C Share Mortgage dated March 30, 2007
among H3C Holdings Limited, as Mortgagor,
and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
H3C Equitable Share Charge dated March 29,
2007 among 3Com Technologies, as Chargor,
and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
Deed of Charge in relation to the 100%
equity interests in WFOE dated April 3,
2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral
Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.62
|
|
Deed of Charge in relation to the 100%
equity interests in Queenhive dated April
3, 2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral
Agent
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
Deed of Release made March 30, 2007 by
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent, in
favour of 3Com Technologies
|
|
10-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.61 |
|
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.64
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement made as of July
24, 2006 by and between 3Com Corporation
and SSC II, L.P.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
7/26/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
95
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on the 25th day of July, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3COM CORPORATION
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Robert Y. L. Mao |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Y. L. Mao
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the
25th
day of July, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
/s/
|
|
ROBERT Y. L. MAO
|
|
and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(Robert Y. L. Mao)
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
/s/
|
|
JAY ZAGER
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Jay Zager)
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
ERIC A. BENHAMOU
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
(Eric A. Benhamou) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
GARY T. DICAMILLO
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(Gary T. DiCamillo) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(James R. Long) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(Raj Reddy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
RONALD A. SEGE
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(Ronald A. Sege) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
DOMINIQUE TREMPONT
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dominique Trempont) |
|
|
96
SCHEDULE II
3Com Corporation
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
For the Years Ended May 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
to Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
Description |
|
Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Other |
|
Deductions |
|
Period |
Year ended May 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
(2) |
|
$ |
(167 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
16,422 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
(2) |
|
|
18,416 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
41,782 |
|
|
|
28,424 |
|
|
|
4,543 |
(2) |
|
|
32,958 |
|
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
16,422 |
|
|
$ |
(586 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
544 |
(1) |
|
$ |
15,292 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
13,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,614 |
|
|
|
6,041 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
46,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,601 |
|
|
|
40,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
$ |
(2,234 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
805 |
(1) |
|
$ |
12,253 |
|
Allowance for product returns |
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
12,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,388 |
|
|
|
4,618 |
|
Accrued product warranty |
|
|
40,596 |
|
|
|
33,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,688 |
|
|
|
36,897 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accounts written off net of recoveries |
|
(2) |
|
Represents reserves related to the H3C acquisition |
97
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Master Separation and Distribution |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.1 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.11 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
December 13, 2004, by and among the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Huawei |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 22, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
Diamond II Holdings, Inc., Diamond II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Corp. and 3Com Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dated as of September 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
3.4 |
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
correct an error in the Certificate of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on March |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.1 |
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
23, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights, |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.6 |
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
Preferences and Privileges of Series A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participating Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares |
|
8-A/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 (Rights Plan) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Plan, dated as of |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
3Com Corporation 1983 Stock Option Plan, as |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
1/11/02 |
|
|
|
|
amended and restated effective September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2001* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Purchase Plan, amended and restated as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 18, 2008 (subject to shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approval)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
3Com Corporation Director Stock Option |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.4 |
|
10/10/03 |
|
|
|
|
Plan, as amended* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
3Com Corporation Restricted Stock Plan, as |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.6 |
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
amended July 1, 2001* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
3Com Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, as |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.7 |
|
8/2/02 |
|
|
|
|
amended and restated effective April 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, as |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
10/3/05 |
|
|
|
|
amended* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.8 |
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2006 by and between R. Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray and 3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
September 5, 2006 by and between Edgar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masri and 3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated |
|
S-8 |
|
333-144322 |
|
10.2 |
|
7/3/07 |
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2007 by and between Jay Zager and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
Stand Alone Restricted Stock Agreement |
|
S-8 |
|
333-144322 |
|
10.3 |
|
7/3/07 |
|
|
|
|
dated July 3, 2007 by and between Jay Zager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003 |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.7 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
Stock Plan (Non-Employee Directors) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2003 |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.8 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
Stock Plan (Employees)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
Form of Performance Accelerated Vesting |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.9 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Agreement* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
Form of Performance Vesting Restricted |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.6 |
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
Stock Agreement* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement - |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.10 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
Standard 4-Year Vesting* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
11/17/05 |
|
|
|
|
(Time-Based Vesting)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Award |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.3 |
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
R. Scott Murray Employment Agreement, |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
2/6/06 |
|
|
|
|
amended and restated as of February 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006, between the registrant and R. Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
Performance Vesting Restricted Stock |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.7 |
|
4/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated January 25, 2006 by and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
between R. Scott Murray and 3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
Edgar Masri Employment Agreement, dated as |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
8/9/06 |
|
|
|
|
of August 8, 2007, between the registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Edgar Masri * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of March |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.21 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
29, 2007, between H3C and Shusheng Zheng* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
Offer Letter dated May 9, 2007 between the |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
5/10/07 |
|
|
|
|
Registrant and Jay Zager* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
Offer Letter dated June 19, 2004 between |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.16 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
the Registrant and Donald M, Halsted III* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
Offer Letter dated September 12, 2003 |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.17 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
between the Registrant and Neal D. Goldman* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.18 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
the Registrant and Marc Willebeek-LeMair* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
Offer Letter dated April 11, 2006 between |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
4/17/06 |
|
|
|
|
the Registrant and Robert Dechant* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
Offer Letter dated November 2, 2005 between |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.27 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
the Registrant and James Hamilton* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
Severance Benefits Agreement dated February |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.28 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
28, 2007, between the Registrant and James |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
Robert Y. L. Mao Employment Agreement, |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.29 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
dated as of August 7, 2006, between the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
registrant and Robert Y. L. Mao* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
Robert Y. L. Mao Employment Agreement dated |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
4/30/08 |
|
|
|
|
as of April 29, 2008, between the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
registrant and Robert Y. L. Mao* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
Ronald A. Sege Employment Agreement dated |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
4/30/08 |
|
|
|
|
as of April 29, 2008, between the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
registrant and Ronald A. Sege * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement dated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
May 6, 2008 by and between Ronald A. Sege |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
Stand Alone Restricted Stock Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
dated May 6, 2008 by and between Ronald A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sege and 3Com Corporation * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
Summary of Equity Appreciation Rights Plan |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.31 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
(H3C Technologies)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.3 |
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
Severance Plan, amended and restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective September 11, 2006 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
Above Grade Severance Plan effective |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.33 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
September 11, 2006 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
Form of Severance Benefits Agreement |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.3 |
|
4/4/06 |
|
|
|
|
between the Registrant and each of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
officers or former officers named in our |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proxy statement (other than Messrs. Mao, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sege. Masri and Murray)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.15 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
between the Registrant and each of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
following officers or former officers named |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in our proxy statement: Messrs. Goldman, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Halsted, Hamilton and Willebeek-LeMair* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
Form of Management Retention Agreement |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.36 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
between the Registrant and the following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
officers or former officers named in our |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proxy statements: Messrs. Dechant, Zheng |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Zager and future executive officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than Messrs. Mao, Sege, Masri and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
3Com Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan* |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.23 |
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the |
|
S-3/A |
|
333-102591 |
|
10.1 |
|
4/9/03 |
|
|
|
|
Registrant and its officers and directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
Office Lease, dated as of November 26, |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.20 |
|
8/9/04 |
|
|
|
|
2002, by and between Marlborough Campus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partnership and the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.17 |
|
8/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
November 26, 2002, by and between |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of July |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
4/5/05 |
|
|
|
|
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of July |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
7/22/05 |
|
|
|
|
18, 2005, by and between 3Com Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease dated as of |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2005 by and between |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Com Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease dated as of |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
1/09/07 |
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2006 by and between Bel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marlborough I LLC and 3Com Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
Agreement for the Lease of Hangzhou Real |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.7 |
|
10/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
Property between Huawei Technologies Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ltd. and Hangzhou Huawei-3Com Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co., Ltd. dated January 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.49 |
|
Shareholders Agreement by and among |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.33 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ltd., 3Com Technologies and Huawei-3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co., Ltd. (the
Shareholders Agreement) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dated as of November 15, 2003 (Certain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portions Omitted; Confidential Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requested) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Shareholders |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.34 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Certain Potions Omitted; Confidential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment Requested) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.35 |
|
8/11/06 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated as of January 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Certain Portions Omitted; Confidential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment Requested) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
3/23/07 |
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Borrower, 3Com Corporation, 3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Limited and 3Com Technologies, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdco Guarantors, various Lenders, Goldman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Mandated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited, as Collateral Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
5/25/07 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated as of May 25, 2007 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective as of May 31, 2007 among H3C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Limited, as Borrower, 3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation, 3Com Holdings Limited and 3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies, as Holdco Guarantors, H3C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies Co., Limited, as Guarantor, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners L.P., as Mandated Lead Arranger, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndication Agent, and Industrial and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral Agent (the A&R Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
First Amendment to A&R Credit Agreement, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
dated as of June 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.55 |
|
Borrower Share Charge dated March 22, 2007 |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.53 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Technologies, as Chargor, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
Borrower Fixed and Floating Charge dated |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.54 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
Borrower Charge Over Bank Accounts dated |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.55 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2007 among H3C Holdings Limited, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
H3C Fixed and Floating Charge dated April |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.56 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
3, 2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
H3C Share Mortgage dated March 30, 2007 |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.57 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
among H3C Holdings Limited, as Mortgagor, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
H3C Equitable Share Charge dated March 29, |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.58 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
2007 among 3Com Technologies, as Chargor, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.61 |
|
Deed of Charge in relation to the 100% |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.59 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
equity interests in WFOE dated April 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.62 |
|
Deed of Charge in relation to the 100% |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.60 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
equity interests in Queenhive dated April |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3, 2007 among Huawei-3Com Co., Limited, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chargor, and Industrial and Commercial Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
Deed of Release made March 30, 2007 by |
|
10-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.61 |
|
7/31/07 |
|
|
|
|
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent, in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
favour of 3Com Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement made as of July |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
7/26/06 |
|
|
|
|
24, 2006 by and between 3Com Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and SSC II, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Accounting Firm - Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
102