NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
Commission file number 0-17254
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
STATE OF DELAWARE
|
|
59-2767632 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
11960 S.W. 144th Street, Miami, FL 33186
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(305) 253-5099
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the last practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Common stock $.0001 par value
|
|
23,783,587 |
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX
Cautionary Factors: Statements in this report that are not descriptions of historical facts are
forward-looking statements provided under the safe harbor protection of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results, performance and achievements may be materially
different from those expressed or implied by such statements and readers should consider the risks
and uncertainties associated with our business that are discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and Item 1A of Part II of this
report, as well as other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Trademark Information: Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot, Estradot® and
Menorest are trademarks of Novartis AG or its affiliated companies; CombiPatch® and
Estalis® are registered trademarks of Vivelle Ventures LLC; and Daytrana is
a trademark of Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Statements of Operations
Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,630 |
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
8,717 |
|
|
$ |
9,692 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues Novogyne |
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
12,064 |
|
|
|
12,519 |
|
Product revenues third parties |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
9,887 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues |
|
|
13,304 |
|
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
21,951 |
|
|
|
20,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
License |
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
17,547 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
27,739 |
|
|
|
23,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold Novogyne |
|
|
4,459 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
Cost of products sold third parties |
|
|
7,428 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products sold |
|
|
11,887 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
18,027 |
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
20,415 |
|
|
|
12,458 |
|
|
|
34,775 |
|
|
|
25,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
(7,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
11,089 |
|
|
|
9,013 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
8,007 |
|
|
|
5,775 |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,333 |
|
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,685 |
|
|
|
23,565 |
|
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
23,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,071 |
|
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
23,925 |
|
|
|
24,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,570 |
|
|
$ |
66,964 |
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
114,660 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Accounts receivable trade (less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $42 in 2006 and $53 in 2005) |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
Accounts receivable Novogyne, net |
|
|
7,067 |
|
|
|
8,912 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
7,861 |
|
Net deferred income tax asset, current portion |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,854 |
|
|
|
119,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
34,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne |
|
|
21,910 |
|
|
|
23,243 |
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
|
7,356 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
Patent development costs, net |
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,865 |
|
|
|
31,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
229,729 |
|
|
$ |
185,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
4,702 |
|
|
$ |
5,812 |
|
Capital lease obligation current portion |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Accrued liability Shire |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
5,771 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Deferred contract revenues |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Deferred license revenues current portion |
|
|
11,279 |
|
|
|
7,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,198 |
|
|
|
28,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Deferred license revenues |
|
|
58,670 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,664 |
|
|
|
45,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 100,000 shares of $.01 par
value; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized 80,000,000 shares,
par value $.0001 per share; issued and
outstanding 23,719,753 at June 30, 2006 and
23,617,221 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
92,453 |
|
|
|
89,846 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
54,610 |
|
|
|
50,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,065 |
|
|
|
140,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
229,729 |
|
|
$ |
185,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of patent costs |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred rent credit |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Income tax benefits on exercise of stock options |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
Recognition of deferred license revenues |
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
(11,089 |
) |
|
|
(9,013 |
) |
Distributions from Novogyne |
|
|
10,210 |
|
|
|
8,926 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable trade, net |
|
|
(2,947 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
Decrease in accounts receivable Novogyne, net |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(3,790 |
) |
Decrease in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
3,664 |
|
|
|
4,394 |
|
Increase in prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
Increase in deposits and other assets |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(5,881 |
) |
Decrease in accrued liability Shire |
|
|
(5,069 |
) |
|
|
(5,608 |
) |
Decrease in accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
(2,164 |
) |
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
Decrease in deferred contract revenue, net |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Increase in deferred license revenue |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred compensation liability |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recoverable from (reimburseable to) Shire and offset against
deferred license revenue related to Daytrana approval |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
45,619 |
|
|
|
(12,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(4,405 |
) |
|
|
(4,582 |
) |
Payments for patent development costs, net |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Purchase of company-owned life insurance |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(685,035 |
) |
|
|
(201,665 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
588,275 |
|
|
|
157,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(101,766 |
) |
|
|
(49,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from exercise of stock options |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Payments under capital leases |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(55,394 |
) |
|
|
(60,625 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
66,964 |
|
|
|
93,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
11,570 |
|
|
$ |
33,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
1. |
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS: |
Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Noven) was incorporated in Delaware in 1987 and is engaged
in the research, development, manufacture and marketing of advanced transdermal drug delivery
technologies and prescription transdermal products.
Noven and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis) entered into a joint venture,
Vivelle Ventures LLC (d/b/a Novogyne Pharmaceuticals) (Novogyne), effective May 1, 1998, to
market and sell womens prescription healthcare products in the United States and Canada. These
products include Novens transdermal estrogen delivery systems marketed under the brand names
Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch®. Noven accounts for its
49% investment in Novogyne under the equity method and reports its share of Novogynes earnings
as Equity in earnings of Novogyne on its Statements of Operations. Noven defers the
recognition of 49% of its profit on products sold to Novogyne until the products are sold by
Novogyne to third party customers.
2. |
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION: |
In managements opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of
Noven contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Noven as of June 30, 2006,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three and six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005. Novens business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties including,
but not limited to, those set forth in Part I Item 1A of Novens Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (Form 10-K), and in Part II Item 1A Risk Factors
of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the results of operations and cash flows
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are not, and should not be construed
as, necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows which may be reported for
the remainder of 2006 or for periods thereafter.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q.
Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The unaudited
condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
the notes to the financial statements included in Novens Form 10-K. The accounting policies
followed for interim financial reporting are the same as those disclosed in Note 2 of the notes
to the financial statements included in Novens Form 10-K, as updated and supplemented by the
following:
VENDOR DISCOUNTS:
Noven receives purchase-volume-related discounts and rebates from vendors in the normal
course of business. Management uses projected purchase volumes to estimate accrual rates,
validates those projections based on actual purchase trends and applies those rates to actual
purchase volumes to determine the amount of funds accrued by Noven and receivable from the
vendor. Amounts accrued could be impacted if actual purchase volumes differ from projected
purchase volumes. Noven treats purchase-volume-related discounts or rebates as a reduction of
inventory cost or cost of products sold, depending on whether the related inventory is
on-hand or has been previously sold, which is consistent with Emerging Issues Task Force
02-16 Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from
a Vendor.
6
3. |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS: |
Cash and cash equivalents includes all highly liquid investments with an original maturity
of three months or less at the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30,
2006, and December 31, 2005, consisted primarily of overnight money market accounts, time
deposits, commercial paper and money market funds with original maturities of three months or
less at the date of purchase. Noven has invested a majority of its cash in short-term
investments, which primarily consist of investment grade, asset backed, variable rate debt
obligations and municipal auction rate securities, which are categorized as available-for-sale
under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Despite the long-term
nature of their stated contractual maturities, these securities have provisions that allow for
liquidation in the short-term. Accordingly, the short-term investments are reported at fair
value, with any related unrealized gains and losses included in comprehensive income as a
separate component of stockholders equity, net of applicable taxes. As of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, the cost of all short-term investments approximated fair value. No
unrealized gains and losses have been recognized for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Realized gains and losses, interest, and dividends are included in interest
income or interest expense, as appropriate.
4. |
|
RECLASSIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS: |
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform
to the current periods presentation. Cost of products sold has been revised for the prior
period to include certain amounts previously included in research and development expenses.
5. |
|
CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
Cash payments for income taxes were $0.2 million for each of the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005. Cash payments for interest were not material for the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005.
Non-cash Operating Activities
In 2002, the State of New Jersey enacted legislation that requires Novogyne to remit
estimated state income tax payments on behalf of its owners, Noven and Novartis. In April 2006
and 2005, Novogyne paid $2.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, to the New Jersey
Department of Revenue, representing Novens portion of Novogynes estimated state income tax
payment. These payments were deemed a distribution to Noven from Novogyne.
Non-cash Investing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Noven recorded approximately $0.9 million in
leasehold improvements as a deferred rent credit as the landlord paid for the applicable
leasehold improvements.
6. |
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: |
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No.
48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) to clarify the accounting for
uncertainties related to income taxes that are recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in
7
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN
48 is a two-step process. The first step is recognition, which requires an enterprise to
determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon
examination based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement,
which requires a company to recognize a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective as of the beginning of the
first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2006. As Noven believes it
currently performs both the recognition and measurement process prescribed by FIN 48, it does
not expect that the adoption of this interpretation will have a material impact on its results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The following are the major classes of inventories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Pre-launch |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Pre-launch |
|
|
Total |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
4,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,832 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,832 |
|
|
$ |
5,460 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
7,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-launch inventories as of December 31, 2005 consisted of Novens Daytrana
product, which received final approval from the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in April 2006 and was commercially launched in June 2006. Provisions
have been made to reduce inventories to net realizable value.
Certain materials and compounds are available from limited sources and, in some cases, a
single supplier. While Noven has not, to date, experienced any difficulty acquiring materials
necessary to manufacture its products no assurance can be given that Noven will not experience
such difficulty in the future. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) must grant
Noven quota for controlled substances such as methylphenidate, the active ingredient in
Daytrana, and no assurance can be given that Noven will be granted sufficient DEA
quota to meet production requirements for Daytrana.
Other than products produced for commercial sale, Novens policy is to immediately
recognize as expense all inventory purchased for research and development purposes.
Shire plc (Shire) retains title to the active methylphenidate ingredient (AMI) in
Daytrana. AMI is not included in Daytrana product revenues or in Novens cost of products sold. Noven records AMI maintained at its manufacturing facility as
consignment inventory and bears certain risks of loss related to the AMI. These risks include
the contractual obligation of Noven to reimburse Shire for the cost of AMI if Noven does not
meet certain minimum contractual yields of the finished product. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, Noven used $2.1 million of AMI in the finished product and
reimbursed Shire approximately $0.4 million for excess AMI used in production which amount is
included in cost of products sold. Noven had $1.4 million of consignment AMI inventory on hand
at June 30, 2006, which is not reflected in the table above.
Prior to January 1, 2006, all awards granted to employees under the 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan) were stock options. In 2006, Noven began granting
stock-
8
settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) to employees and nonvested shares (restricted
stock) to non-employee directors in lieu of stock options.
At June 30, 2006, there were 3,859,351 stock options and 26,000 SSARs issued and
outstanding under the 1999 Plan. Since November 21, 2004, stock options and SSARs granted under
the 1999 Plan have had a vesting period of four years, beginning one year after date of grant,
and expire seven years after date of grant.
In May 2006, Noven issued a total of 34,344 shares of restricted stock to its non-employee
directors. The grants fall under the definition of nonvested shares under SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). The shares vest over each directors one-year
service period at the end of each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended June 30,
2006.
During the first quarter of 2006, Noven adopted the provisions of, and began accounting for
stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS 123(R). Under the fair value recognition
provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based
on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Noven elected the
modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes.
The valuation provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding
as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Estimated compensation for grants that
were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period
using the grant date fair value previously calculated for the SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) pro forma disclosures requisite.
Noven currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options and SSARs. The grant date fair value of stock-based payment awards using an
option-pricing model is affected by Novens stock price as well as assumptions regarding a
number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include Novens expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee equity award exercise
behaviors, risk-free interest rate, estimated forfeitures of awards and expected dividends.
Noven estimates the expected term of options granted by taking the average of the vesting
term and the contractual term of the option, as described in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14: Share-Based Payment (SAB 107) (SAB 107).
Noven estimates the volatility of common stock by using a combination of both historical and
implied volatility based on an equal weighting of each as management believes it is the expected
volatility that marketplace participants would likely use in determining an exchange price for
an option. Noven bases the risk-free interest rate that Noven uses in the option valuation model
on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the
options. Noven does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and
therefore uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. Noven is
required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Noven uses historical data to
estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and records stock-based compensation expense only for
those awards that are expected to vest. All stock-based payment awards are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the
vesting periods.
9
The assumptions used to value option grants for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June
30, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Volatility |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total stock-based compensation recognized in Novens statements of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit recognized related to compensation expense |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of inventory or fixed
assets for the period ended June 30, 2006.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), Noven presented all tax benefits for deductions
resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of
incentive stock options as operating cash flows on its statement of cash flows. SFAS 123(R)
requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense, determined
on an individual award basis, to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an
operating cash flow. This requirement has the effect of reducing net operating cash flows and
increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. However, under this requirement,
total cash flow remains unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting
rules. Cash received from options exercised under all share-based payment arrangements for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The
tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercise of the share-based payment
arrangements totaled $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. There were no benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized
stock-based compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow for the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
10
Stock option transactions related to the plans are summarized as follows for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 (options / SSARs and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Options/ |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
SSARs |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Term |
|
Outstanding at beginning of the period |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
$ |
17.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
8.10 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled and expired |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
19.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of the period |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period |
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information concerning Novens restricted stock at June 30,
2006 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Nonvested at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
17.47 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
17.47 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
17.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation expense that Noven expects to record in
future periods related to currently outstanding unvested stock options, SSARs and restricted
stock, as determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R), is approximately $6.4 million before the
effect of income taxes, of which $1.7 million, $2.6 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million is
expected to be incurred in the remainder of 2006 and in
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The weighted-average period over which this
compensation cost is expected to be recognized is 2.5 years.
Prior to 2006, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), Noven
elected to continue to apply the provisions of the Accounting Principles Boards Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations in
accounting for its employee stock option plans. Therefore no stock-based employee compensation
cost is reflected in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as all options
granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant.
11
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005 if Noven had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(10,223 |
) |
|
|
(11,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(5,102 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
In order to eliminate some of the future compensation expense that Noven would otherwise
have recognized in its statements of operations under SFAS 123(R), during 2005 Noven
accelerated the vesting of certain stock options under the 1999 Plan. As a result of this
action, options to purchase approximately 1.1 million shares of Novens common stock became
immediately exercisable, including options held by Novens executive officers to purchase
approximately 455,000 shares. Noven recorded an immaterial charge to compensation expense
during the fourth quarter of 2005 due to the acceleration of a nominal amount of in-the-money
options. As a result of the acceleration, during 2005, approximately $10.1 million of
compensation expense, net of applicable income taxes, was eliminated from Novens future
statements of operations and included in the pro forma footnote disclosure for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
9. |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: |
Effective January 1, 2006, Noven established a deferred compensation plan (the Plan)
available to Novens officers and members of its Board of Directors. The Plan permits
participants to defer receipt of part of their current compensation to a later date as part of
their personal retirement or financial planning.
Participants may elect to defer, as applicable, portions of their director fees, base
salary, bonus, long-term incentive plan awards, and/or restricted stock grants. Benefit
security for the Plan is provided by a funded rabbi trust.
The compensation withheld from Plan participants, together with investment income on the
Plan, is reflected as a deferred compensation obligation to participants and is classified as a
long-term liability in the accompanying condensed balance sheets. The related assets, which
are held in the rabbi trust in the form of a company-owned life insurance policy that names
Noven as the beneficiary, are classified within other assets in the
accompanying condensed balance sheets and are reported at cash surrender value, which was
approximately $0.2 million as of June 30, 2006. At June 30, 2006, the balance of the deferred
compensation liability totaled $0.1 million.
12
10. |
|
CONTRACT AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS: |
|
|
|
Shire |
On April 6, 2006, Novens amended New Drug Application (NDA) for Daytrana was
approved for marketing by the FDA. In April 2006, Noven received a $50 million milestone
payment from Shire (the global licensee of the product) as a result of the approval, and Noven
may also earn additional milestone payments of up to $75 million depending on the level of
Shires commercial sales of the product. The product was commercially launched by Shire in June
2006. Noven expects to defer and recognize approval and sales milestones as license revenues on
a straight-line basis through the first quarter of 2013, which is Novens current best estimate
of the useful economic life of the product. Noven began recognizing the $50 million milestone
payment as well as the balance of the Shire deferred license revenues ($4.8 million at March 31,
2006) in the second quarter of 2006. Noven also manufactures and
supplies finished product for Shire.
In July 2006, Noven and Shire amended their agreement related to the development of a
transdermal amphetamine patch for ADHD. Under the original agreement, Noven is entitled to
payments of up to $5.0 million if certain development milestones are achieved. As of June 30,
2006, Noven has received $0.5 million in such milestone payments. Under the amendment, Shire
paid Noven an additional $1.0 million in August 2006 in exchange for which Noven will perform
certain early-stage development activities which were previously to be performed by Shire and
which amount Noven expects to recognize over time. Upon completion of such
development activities by Noven, Shire may elect to retain exclusive rights to the product under
development in exchange for payment of a total of $5.9 million.
Other
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, Noven recognized a $1.0 million one-time
payment from a third party for a license to certain Noven patents due to Noven having no continuing involvement nor Noven having any future economic benefit related to the license.
11. |
|
INVESTMENT IN VIVELLE VENTURES LLC (d/b/a NOVOGYNE): |
Noven shares in the earnings of Novogyne, after satisfaction of an annual preferred return
of $6.1 million to Novartis, according to an established formula. Novens share of Novogynes
earnings increases as
Novogynes product sales increase, subject to a cap of 49%. Novogyne produced sufficient
income in the first quarter of 2006 and 2005 to meet Novartis annual preferred return for those
years and for Noven to recognize earnings from Novogyne under the formula.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Noven had the following
transactions with Novogyne (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,630 |
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
8,717 |
|
|
$ |
9,692 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,288 |
|
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
|
$ |
12,064 |
|
|
$ |
12,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursed expenses |
|
$ |
6,648 |
|
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
$ |
13,918 |
|
|
$ |
13,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Noven had amounts due from Novogyne of $7.1
million and $8.9 million, respectively, for products sold to, and marketing expenses
reimbursable by, Novogyne.
The unaudited condensed statements of operations of Novogyne for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross revenues |
|
$ |
35,665 |
|
|
$ |
35,211 |
|
|
$ |
72,934 |
|
|
$ |
62,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales allowances |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
7,071 |
|
Sales return allowances |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales allowances and returns |
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
31,936 |
|
|
|
62,212 |
|
|
|
54,609 |
|
Cost of sales1 |
|
|
7,162 |
|
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
14,683 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
7,770 |
|
|
|
18,753 |
|
|
|
16,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,874 |
|
|
|
16,859 |
|
|
|
28,776 |
|
|
|
24,762 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,036 |
|
|
$ |
16,901 |
|
|
$ |
29,090 |
|
|
$ |
24,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novens equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
$ |
6,762 |
|
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Included in Novogynes costs of sales for all periods presented in the table is the amortization of the
marketing rights Novogyne acquired for CombiPatch®, which in prior reports was listed
as a separate operating expense in Novogynes statement of operations. |
The activity in the Investment in Novogyne account for the six months ended June 30, 2006
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne, beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,243 |
|
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
11,089 |
|
Cash distributions from Novogyne |
|
|
(10,210 |
) |
Non-cash distribution from Novogyne (Note 5) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne, end of period |
|
$ |
21,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the approval of Novogynes management committee, Novogyne may, from time to
time, distribute cash to Novartis and Noven based upon a contractual formula. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2006, Noven received cash distributions representing return on
investment of $2.9 million and $10.2 million from Novogyne, respectively. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, Noven received cash distributions representing return on investment
of $1.5 million and $8.9 million from Novogyne, respectively. In addition, as discussed in Note
5, tax payments of $2.2 million and $1.5 million were made by Novogyne on Novens behalf to the
New Jersey Department of Revenue in April 2006 and 2005, respectively. These payments were
deemed distributions from Novogyne to Noven and were recorded as reductions in Novens
investment in Novogyne when deemed received.
14
12. |
|
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM: |
In the first quarter of 2003, Novens Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase
program under which Noven may acquire up to $25.0 million of its common stock. To date, Noven
has repurchased 105,000 shares of its common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $1.3
million. No shares were repurchased during the six months ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.
13. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: |
HT Studies
As a result of the findings from the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) study and other
studies previously disclosed in Novens Form 10-K, the FDA has required that black box
labeling be included on all menopausal hormone therapy (HT) products marketed in the United
States to warn, among other things, that these products have been associated with increased
risks for heart disease, heart attacks, strokes, and breast cancer and that they are not
approved for heart disease prevention.
Researchers continue to analyze data from both arms of the WHI study and other studies.
Other studies evaluating HT are currently underway or in the planning stages as disclosed in
Novens Form 10-K. The market for Novens products could be adversely affected if these studies
find that a transdermal estrogen patch is less beneficial than other dosage forms, and Noven
could be subject to increased product liability risk if HT patch
products are found to increase the risk of adverse health consequences. Noven is currently
named as a defendant in six product liability lawsuits involving its HT products and Noven may
have liability with respect to other actions in which it has not, to date, been made a party.
See Litigation, Claims and Assessments below for a further discussion on related product
liability lawsuits.
Since the July 2002 publication of the WHI and other study data, total United States
prescriptions have declined for substantially all HT products, including Novens products in the
aggregate. Prescriptions for CombiPatch®, Novens combination estrogen/progestin
patch, continue to decline in the post-WHI environment. Novogyne recorded the acquisition of
the marketing rights for Novens CombiPatch® product at cost and Novogyne tests this
asset for impairment on a periodic basis. Further adverse change in the market for HT products
could have a material adverse impact on the ability of Novogyne to recover its investment in
these rights, which could require Novogyne to record an impairment loss on the
CombiPatch® intangible asset. Impairment of the CombiPatch® intangible
asset would adversely affect Novogynes and Novens financial results. Management cannot
predict whether these or other studies will have additional adverse effects on Novens liquidity
and results of operations, or Novogynes ability to recover the net carrying value of the
CombiPatch® intangible asset.
Production Issues
Noven maintains in-house product stability testing for its commercialized products. This
process includes, among other things, testing samples from commercial lots under a variety of
conditions to confirm that the samples remain within required specifications for the shelf life
of the product.
In 2003, Novens product stability testing program revealed that certain lots of
CombiPatch® and Vivelle-Dot patches did not maintain required
specifications throughout the products shelf lives, resulting in product recalls of certain
lots. As a result, Noven initiated a series of special stability protocols to monitor
commercial lots in distribution as well as future
15
production. In the first quarter of 2005, a
total of ten lots of Vivelle-Dot manufactured in 2003 were identified for recall
when one of Novens stability protocols revealed that these lots did not meet required
specification or were associated with lots that did not meet specification. The recall of these
lots in the first quarter of 2005 did not have a material impact on Novens or Novogynes
results of operations because an immaterial number of patches from these lots remained in
distribution. A joint Noven and Novartis task force is working to identify the definitive root
cause of the Vivelle-Dot stability failures. Based on testing and analysis to date,
Noven believes that the probable cause of the Vivelle-Dot stability failures relates
to certain patch backing material that Noven obtained from a raw material supplier. If the root
cause determination or additional testing indicates that the production issue affects more
product than Novens current testing and analysis suggests, additional recalls may be required.
Noven continues to manufacture and ship Vivelle-Dot to Novogyne.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis Pharma), an affiliate of
Novartis, recalled three commercial lots of Estalis® (the form of
CombiPatch® manufactured for sale outside the United States) after special stability
protocols put in place after an October 2004 CombiPatch® stability failure indicated
that certain lots did not maintain required specifications throughout the products shelf-life
due to the formation of crystals. The recall of these lots did not have a material impact on
Novens financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. During 2006, additional lots
of Estalis® have been found to have developed crystals as well. Any recall of these
lots by Novartis Pharma is not expected to have a material impact on Novens results of
operations because an immaterial number of patches from these lots remain in distribution.
Noven continues to manufacture and ship Estalis® to Novartis Pharma.
Noven continues to maintain stability testing related to the foregoing production issues.
If Novens testing indicates that additional lots of CombiPatch®, Estalis®
or Vivelle-Dot or other products do not meet specifications, there could be
additional recalls. Although Noven and Novartis work together in assessing production issues
related to these products, the decision to recall product resides with Novartis and its affiliates as the holders of
the regulatory approvals for these products and is not within Novens control. If Novens
estimate concerning product returns associated with a recall are incorrect, or if Novens
continued testing indicates that additional lots are affected, or if Novartis should initiate
additional recalls for any reason, then Novens and Novogynes business and results of
operations could be materially and adversely impacted. Among other things, any
CombiPatch® recalls could have a material adverse impact on the ability of Novogyne
to recover its investment in its CombiPatch® marketing rights.
The recent recalls may result in an FDA inspection of Novens facilities and procedures and
Noven cannot assure that the FDA will be satisfied with Novens operations and procedures, which
could result in more frequent and stringent inspections and monitoring. If the FDA were to
conclude that Novens manufacturing controls and procedures are not sufficient, Noven could be
required to suspend production until Noven demonstrates to the FDA that Novens controls and
procedures are sufficient.
Supply Agreement
Novens supply agreement with Novogyne for Vivelle® and Vivelle-Dot
patches expired in January 2003. Since expiration, the parties have continued to operate in
accordance with the supply agreements commercial terms. There is no assurance that the
agreements non-commercial terms would be enforceable with respect to post-expiration
occurrences. A decision to discontinue operating in accordance with the agreement under the
agreements commercial terms could have a material adverse effect on Novens financial position
and results of operations. Novogynes designation of a new supplier and approval of a new
supply agreement would require the affirmative vote of four of the five members of Novogynes
Management Committee. Accordingly, both Novartis and Noven must agree on Novogynes supplier.
16
Litigation, Claims and Assessments
In September 2005, Noven, Novogyne and Novartis were served with a summons and complaint
from an individual plaintiff in Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Atlantic County in
which the plaintiff claims personal injury allegedly arising from the use of HT products,
including Vivelle®. The plaintiff claims compensatory, punitive and other damages in
an unspecified amount. Noven does not expect any activity in this case in the near future, as
the court has indicated that it intends to stay proceedings in all its pending and future HT
cases except for cases where Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and its affiliates and Pfizer, Inc. are the
defendants.
In April 2006, an individual plaintiff and her husband filed a complaint in the United
States District Court, District of Minnesota against Noven, Novogyne, Novartis, Wyeth Inc. and
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. alleging liability in connection with personal injury claims
allegedly arising from the use of HT products, including Novens CombiPatch® product.
The plaintiffs claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified amount.
In July 2006, four complaints were filed in the United States District Court, District of
Minnesota against Noven and other pharmaceutical companies by four separate individual
plaintiffs, each filing alone or with her husband. Three of the complaints also name Novartis
as a defendant, and of these, two name Novogyne as a defendant as well. Each complaint alleges
liability in connection with personal injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT
products, including Vivelle® in one case and CombiPatch® in two of the
cases. The plaintiffs in each case claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified
amount. Noven has established an accrual for the expected legal fees related to the cases
referenced above, although the amount is not material.
Novartis has advised Noven that Novartis has been named as a defendant in at least 26
pending additional lawsuits that include approximately 33 plaintiffs that allege liability in
connection with personal injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT patches distributed
and sold by Novartis and Novogyne, including Novens Vivelle-Dot,
Vivelle®, and CombiPatch® products. In addition, in July 2006 Novartis
was named as a defendant in at least 71 additional lawsuits (along with several other
defendants) in which the plaintiffs complaints do not identify the HT products used by the
plaintiffs and therefore these cases may also involve Noven HT products. Novogyne has been
named as a defendant in one lawsuit in addition to the four lawsuits referenced above. Novartis
has indicated that it will seek indemnification from Noven and Novogyne to the extent permitted
by the agreements between and among Novartis, Novogyne and Noven. Novogyne has established an
accrual for the expected legal fees and settlements of these lawsuits for $8.3 million with an
offsetting insurance recovery of $6.0 million. This accrual represents Novartis managements
best estimate as of June 30, 2006. Although Novogyne believes that recovery of the insurance
receivable is probable, no assurance can be given that Novogyne will in fact recover such
amount, including as a result of any decision by Novogynes product liability insurance carrier
to contest a claim.
Noven intends to defend all of the foregoing lawsuits vigorously, but the outcome of these
product liability lawsuits cannot ultimately be predicted.
Noven is a party to other pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business, none of which Noven believes is material to its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following section addresses material aspects of our financial condition at June 30, 2006,
and our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The
contents of this section include:
|
|
|
An executive summary of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
An overview of Noven and our Novogyne joint venture; |
|
|
|
|
A review of certain items that may affect the historical or future comparability of our
results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
An analysis of our results of operations and our liquidity and capital resources; |
|
|
|
|
An outlook that includes our current financial guidance; |
|
|
|
|
A discussion of how we apply our critical accounting estimates; and |
|
|
|
|
A discussion of recently-issued accounting standards. |
This discussion should be read in conjunction with Novens financial statements for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form
10-Q, as well as the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations from our Form 10-K.
Executive Summary
The following Executive Summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations appearing in this Item 2 as well
as in our financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q.
The approval, production and launch of Daytrana, our methylphenidate patch for the
treatment of ADHD, influenced our operational activities and significantly impacted our financial results for
the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Daytrana was approved by the FDA on April 6, 2006, triggering payment of a $50
million approval milestone from Shire, the global licensee of the product. The three months ended June
30, 2006 included recognition of $2.0 million in license revenues associated with that milestone.
We manufactured and shipped Daytrana launch quantities during the quarter, resulting in
$3.6 million in product sales to Shire for the quarter. Our timely product shipments permitted
Shire to launch the product in June with sufficient time to begin promotion of the product in
advance of the back-to-school season.
Primarily due to the product and license revenues associated with Daytrana
referenced above, our net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased 49% to $17.5
million.
Our overall gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was materially and adversely
affected by start-up expenses associated with commencing production of
Daytrana, and production inefficiencies including lower than desired yields and costs incurred to meet launch timelines
.. As a result of these inefficiencies and expenses, our gross margin on product sales to
Shire in the second quarter was negative. We are working to improve efficiencies in
Daytrana production and reduce expenses, and we expect but cannot assure that we will
realize gross margin improvement in the second half of 2006.
18
Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 decreased 5% to
$2.9 million compared to the 2005 quarter, primarily as a result of higher 2005 expenses associated
with development engineering for our fentanyl patch. Marketing, general and administrative
expenses increased 35% to $5.6 million, primarily reflecting increases in salary and related
benefits, including stock-based compensation expenses that commenced in 2006.
We recognized $6.8 million in earnings from Novogyne in the three months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to $8.1 million recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2005, reflecting higher
sales returns allowances and higher HT litigation expenses at Novogyne.
Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $3.3 million (or $0.14 diluted
earnings per share), compared to $5.1 million (or $0.21 diluted earnings per share) for the three
months ended June 30, 2005.
Current quarter net revenues at Novogyne decreased 4% to $30.6 million, reflecting increased
sales returns allowances, partially offset by increased sales of Vivelle-Dot and
increased sales of Estradot® to Canada. Novogynes selling, general and administrative
expense increased 24% to $9.6 million, primarily reflecting the timing of sample purchases from
Noven, increased administrative, advertising and promotional expenses and increased HT litigation expense at
Novogyne. Novogynes net income for the current quarter was $14.0 million, compared to $16.9
million reported in the 2005 quarter.
Total prescriptions for Vivelle-Dot increased 6% in the three months ended June
30, 2006 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005, and total prescriptions for Novogynes
products, taken as a whole, increased 2%. For the same period, the overall U.S. HT market declined
5%.
Overview of Noven and Our Novogyne Joint Venture
We develop and manufacture advanced transdermal patches and presently derive the majority of
our revenues from sales of transdermal patches for use in menopausal HT. In the United States, our
HT products are marketed and sold by Novogyne Pharmaceuticals, the joint venture that we formed
with Novartis in 1998. Our business, financial position and results of operations currently depend
on Novogyne and its marketing of our three principal HT products Vivelle®,
Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch® in the United States. A discussion of
Novogynes results of operations and their impact on our results can be found under the caption
Results of OperationsEquity in Earnings of Novogyne.
In all countries other than the United States, Canada and Japan, we have licensed the
marketing rights to these products to Novartis Pharma, which is an affiliate of Novartis. In most
of these markets, Vivelle® is marketed under the brand name Menorest,
Vivelle-Dot is marketed under the brand name Estradot® and
CombiPatch® is marketed under the brand name Estalis®.
We hold a 49% equity interest in Novogyne, and Novartis holds the remaining 51% equity
interest. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, we manufacture and supply
Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch® to Novogyne, perform
marketing, sales and promotional activities, and receive royalties from Novogyne based on
Novogynes sales of the estrogen therapy (ET) products. Novartis distributes
Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch® and provides certain other
services to Novogyne, including financial and accounting functions.
Novartis is entitled to an annual $6.1 million preferred return from Novogyne, which has the
effect of reducing our share of Novogynes income in the first quarter of each year. After the
annual preferred return to Novartis, our share of Novogynes income increases as product sales
increase, subject to a maximum of 49%. Our
share of Novogynes income was $11.1 million and $9.0 million
19
for the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The income we recognize from Novogyne is a non-cash item. Any
cash we receive from Novogyne is in the form of cash distributions declared by Novogynes
Management Committee. Accordingly, the amount of cash that we receive from Novogyne in any period
may not be the same as the amount of income we recognize from Novogyne for that period. For the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we received $10.2 million and $8.9 million, respectively,
in distributions from Novogyne, which, not including the $50 million received from Shire, accounted
for a substantial portion of our net cash flows generated by operating activities for these
periods. We expect that a significant portion of our earnings and cash flow for the next several
years will be generated through our interest in Novogyne, as well as any additional milestone
payments we may receive from Shire. Any failure by Novogyne to remain profitable or to continue to
make distributions would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
The market for HT products, including our transdermal HT products, has contracted since the
July 2002 publication of the WHI study that found adverse health risks associated with HT products.
Comparing the second quarter of 2002 (the quarter immediately preceding the publication of initial
data from the WHI study) to the second quarter of 2006, total prescriptions dispensed in the HT
market in the United States decreased by 53.7%. For the same period, aggregate prescriptions for
Novens United States HT products decreased 7.3%. The estrogen segment of the HT market in the
United States declined 49.3%, while our Vivelle® line of products decreased 6.3%.
Vivelle-Dot, which represented 86.6% of our total United States prescriptions in the
second quarter of 2006, increased 34.9% from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of
2006. We believe Vivelle-Dot patch prescriptions have benefited from both increased
demand and patient conversions from the original Vivelle® product.
United States prescriptions for our CombiPatch® product (which represented
approximately 10.0% of our total United States prescriptions in the second quarter of 2006)
declined 57.0% from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2006, while prescriptions
for the total United States market for fixed combination hormone therapy products decreased 71.8%.
Further decreases in net sales of our CombiPatch® product (whether as a result of the
WHI studies, the production issues discussed below, higher rates of sales returns or otherwise)
could require Novogyne (which holds the CombiPatch® marketing rights) to record an
impairment loss related to this intangible asset, which would adversely affect the results of
operations of both Noven and Novogyne.
Certain Items that May Affect Historical or Future Comparability
For a discussion of certain items that may affect the historical or future comparability of
our results of operations and financial condition, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Form 10-K as well as the
following updated and/or supplemented items. Such disclosure is not intended to address every item
that may affect the historical or future comparability of our results of operations or financial
condition and such disclosure should be read in conjunction with the discussion and analysis of our
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources and outlook appearing elsewhere in this Item
2.
Stock-Based Compensation
Currently, our outstanding stock-based compensation consists of: (i) stock options; (ii)
SSARs; and (iii) restricted stock awards granted to non-employee directors. Prior to January 1,
2006, all awards granted to employees under the 1999 Plan were stock options. In 2006, Noven began
granting SSARs to employees and restricted stock to non-employee directors in lieu of stock
options, and from time to time we may consider or grant other forms of stock-based compensation.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of, and for the three and six months ended June
30, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS 123(R). We
20
elected
the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Under
the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured
at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period. The
determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of
complex and subjective variables. See Critical Accounting Estimates.
Total stock-based compensation recognized in our statements of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 was $1.5 million, of which $1.1 million was recognized in marketing, general
and administrative and $0.2 million was recognized in each of research and development and cost of
products sold, respectively. There were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of
inventory or fixed assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation expense that we expect to record in future
periods related to currently outstanding unvested stock options, SSARs and restricted stock, as
determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R), is approximately $6.4 million before the effect of
income taxes, of which $1.7 million, $2.6 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million is expected to be
incurred in the remainder of 2006 and in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. We will also incur
additional expense in future years related to new equity awards that may be granted in the future
that cannot yet be quantified.
In order to eliminate some of the future compensation expense that we would otherwise have
recognized in our statements of operations under SFAS 123(R), during 2005 we accelerated the
vesting of certain stock options under the 1999 Plan. As a result of this action, options to
purchase approximately 1.1 million shares of our common stock became immediately exercisable,
including options held by our executive officers to purchase approximately 455,000 shares. We
recorded an immaterial charge to compensation expense during the fourth quarter of 2005 due to the
acceleration of a nominal amount of in-the-money options. As a result of the acceleration, during
2005, we eliminated approximately $10.1 million of compensation expense, net of applicable income
taxes, from our future statements of operations and this expense is included in the pro forma
footnote disclosure for the year ended December 31, 2005.
21
Results of Operations
Three and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2005
Revenues
Total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are summarized as
follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Product revenues Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,630 |
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
8,717 |
|
|
$ |
9,692 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Royalties |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12,064 |
|
|
|
12,519 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues third parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
9,731 |
|
|
|
7,823 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Royalties |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
9,887 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues |
|
|
13,304 |
|
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
21,951 |
|
|
|
20,490 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
License |
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
291 |
% |
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
137 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
201 |
% |
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
17,547 |
|
|
$ |
11,771 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
27,739 |
|
|
$ |
23,507 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
As described in more detail below, the 49% increase in net revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily attributable to the product
launch of Daytrana and an increase in license revenue associated with that product. In
addition, aggregate sales to Novogyne increased due to timing of shipments. These increases were
offset by an aggregate decline in international product sales, which we believe was due to the
timing of inventory restocking.
As described in more detail below, the 18% increase in net revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily attributable to the product
launch of Daytrana, an increase in license revenue associated with that product and an
increase in royalties. These increases were offset by an aggregate decline in sales to Novogyne
and international product sales, which we believe was due primarily to the timing of orders.
Product Revenues Novogyne
Product revenues Novogyne consists of our sales of
Vivelle-Dot/Estradot®, CombiPatch® and Vivelle® to
Novogyne at a fixed price for resale by Novogyne primarily in the United States as well as the
royalties we receive as a result of Novogynes sales of Vivelle-Dot and
Vivelle®.
22
The $0.9 million increase in product revenues from Novogyne for the three months ended June
30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $0.8 million, $0.3
million, and $0.2 million increase in unit sales of Vivelle-Dot, Vivelle®
and Estradot®, respectively, partially offset by a $0.4 million decline in
CombiPatch® unit sales. The increase in Vivelle-Dot related to the timing
of sample shipments to Novogyne and the increases in Vivelle® and Estradot®
were attributable to the timing of trade product orders. The decline in CombiPatch® was
primarily related to declining prescription trends which we believe are attributable to the ongoing
effects of WHI and other studies on combination therapy products as well as the impact of a
competitive product.
The $0.5 million decline in product revenues from Novogyne for the six months ended June 30,
2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $0.5 million decline
in both unit sales of Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch®, respectively, partially
offset by a $0.5 million increase in royalties. The decline in Vivelle-Dot was
primarily attributable to a $1.3 million decline in unit sales of trade product partially offset by
a $0.8 million increase in unit sales of samples. The decline in trade product sales was
attributable to the timing of orders placed by Novogyne and not a decline in market demand. The
increase in samples and the decline in CombiPatch® were attributable to the same factors
as discussed above for the comparable three-month periods. The increase in royalties was
attributable to higher sales by Novogyne for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Product Revenues Third Parties
Product revenues third parties consists of sales of Estradot®,
Estalis® and Menorest to Novartis Pharma at a price based on a percentage of Novartis
Pharmas net selling price (subject to certain minima) for resale primarily outside the United
States and Japan, together with royalties generated from Novartis Pharmas sales of
Vivelle® and Estradot® in Canada. Beginning in the second quarter of 2006,
product revenues third parties also includes sales of Daytrana to Shire for
commercial resale in the United States.
The $2.1 million increase in product revenues from third parties for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $3.6 million
and a $0.3 million increase in Daytrana and Femiest (the brand equivalent of Menorest
in Japan) unit sales, respectively, partially offset by a $1.0 million and $0.8 million decline in
unit sales of Estalis® and Estradot®, respectively. Changes in product
pricing were not a contributing factor for the period. The increase in Daytrana was due
to the initial product launch that occurred during the period while the increase in Femiest is
attributable to the timing of orders. The decline in Estalis and Estradot was primarily
attributable to inventory restocking in the prior period by Novartis Pharma.
The $1.9 million increase in product revenues from third parties for the six months ended June
30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $3.6 million
increase in unit sales of Daytrana partially offset by a decline in unit sales of $0.8
million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million of Estalis®, Menorest, and Estradot®,
respectively. In addition, the six month period included a decline of $0.4 million related to
pricing. The increase in Daytrana and the decrease in Estalis® and
Estradot® are attributable to the same factors as discussed above for the three-month
comparable periods. The decline in Menorest is attributable to the continued transition from
Menorest to Estradot®. The decline related to pricing was due to a decline in price
reconciliation payments from Novartis Pharma.
Contract and License Revenues
Contract revenues consist of the recognition of payments received as work is performed on
research and development projects. The payments received may take the form of non-refundable
up-front payments, payments received upon the completion of certain phases of work and success
23
milestone payments. License revenues consist of the recognition of non-refundable up-front,
milestone and similar payments under license agreements.
Contract revenues were approximately the same for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
as compared to the same periods in the prior year. License revenues increased $2.9 million and
$2.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, due primarily to the
recognition in the three months ended June 30, 2006 of $2.0 million in deferred license revenues
related to Daytrana and the recognition of a $1.0 million one-time payment from a third party for a
license to certain of our patents.
Gross Margin
The following section presents Novens gross margin on (i) total product revenues, (ii)
product revenues derived from sales to Novogyne, which for accounting purposes is considered to be a related party; and (iii)
product revenues derived from sales to third parties (i.e., excluding sales to Novogyne).
Gross Margin Total
Novens overall gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is
summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
13,304 |
|
|
$ |
10,360 |
|
|
$ |
21,951 |
|
|
$ |
20,490 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
11,887 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
18,027 |
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (product revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
9,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
Our overall gross margin was materially and adversely affected by a negative gross margin on
product sales of Daytrana (i.e. the costs we incurred to produce the product were
greater than the revenues we realized from the sales of that product). The negative Daytrana
gross margin resulted primarily from start-up expenses associated with commencing
production of Daytrana, and production inefficiencies including lower than desired yields and increased costs associated with meeting launch timelines. For the reasons
discussed below in Gross Margin Sales to Third Parties, we believe that Daytrana
gross margins will improve significantly in the second half of 2006. The quarter ended June 30,
2006 included $2.0 million in license revenues related to Daytrana that are not
included in the calculation of gross margin.
Other factors adversely affecting our overall gross margin included increased personnel
and other resources dedicated to quality control in our HT operations
(which increased approximately $0.3 million and
$0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, in relation to the comparable 2005 periods); a higher percentage of
sample product in our sales to Novogyne (which has a lower margin than trade product sold to
Novogyne); and lower production volume in our HT business due to the timing of orders.
Over the past two years, we expanded our facilities and increased staffing for the
production of fentanyl, Daytrana and other developmental products. Our results of
operations and gross margins for future periods are expected to continue to be adversely affected
by these actions and the related continuing overhead expenses unless and until we are able to
improve the utilization of these resources through the commercialization of additional products or reduce overhead expenses.
Although we are implementing programs intended to reduce overhead, no assurance can be given
24
that
we will be able to improve the utilization of these resources or meaningfully reduce overhead
expenses.
Changes in deferred profit on Novens sale of product to Novogyne (as described below in
Gross Margin Novogyne) did not materially affect our overall gross margins for the three or
six month period ended June 30, 2006.
Gross Margin Sales to Novogyne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
7,288 |
|
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
|
$ |
12,064 |
|
|
$ |
12,519 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
4,459 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (product revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
3,978 |
|
|
|
5,462 |
|
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in deferred profit on
sales of product to Novogyne1 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit excluding changes in
deferred profit on sales of product
to Novogyne1 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin excluding impact
of deferred profit1 |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Novens cost of products sold may be affected in a given period by changes in
deferred profit on Novens sale of product to Novogyne. As a result of our 49% equity investment
in Novogyne, we are required to defer 49% of our profit on product that we sell to Novogyne until
that product is sold by Novogyne to trade customers. Since our cost of products sold is adjusted
to reflect changes in deferred profit, our gross margin can vary from period to period based on the
timing of our shipments to Novogyne and Novogynes sale of our products to trade customers. If
Novogyne sells more product than we provide it in a given period (i.e., if Novogynes inventories
decline), we will defer less profit from sales to Novogyne. In light of the significant historic
fluctuations in our deferred profit on sales of product to Novogyne, we have also disclosed our
gross margin net of the changes in deferred profit on sales of product to Novogyne, which, Novens
management believes, is useful to investors in order to meaningfully evaluate Novens ongoing,
underlying business and compare Novens financial results for the three and six months ended June
30, 2006 to those in the same period of 2005. For the same reasons, management uses these non-GAAP
financial measures to evaluate Novens ongoing, underlying business. These measures should not be
considered alternatives to measures computed in accordance with GAAP, nor should they be considered
indicators of our overall financial performance. |
Gross margin on product sales to Novogyne for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
declined due to product mix as there was a higher percentage of sample sales to Novogyne (which
have a lower margin than sales of trade product). Sample product sales to Novogyne were 18% and
14% of total product sales to Novogyne, not including royalties, for the three and six months ended
25
June 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to 3% for each of the comparable periods in 2005. In
addition, increased personnel and other resources dedicated to quality control in our HT
operations, and to a lesser extent lower production volume of trade product due to the timing of
orders, contributed to the decline in gross margin.
Gross Margin Sales to third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Third Parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
3,933 |
|
|
$ |
9,887 |
|
|
$ |
7,971 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
7,428 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (loss) profit (product revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin on sales to third parties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
declined due to increased cost of products sold resulting from start-up manufacturing expenses
associated with Daytrana, increased personnel and other resources dedicated to quality
control in our HT operations, and to a lesser extent lower production volume in our HT business due
to the timing of orders.
For the three month period ended June 30, 2006, Daytrana product revenues were
$3.6 million and cost of products sold related to Daytrana were $5.0 million. The
quarter ended June 30, 2006 included $2.0 million in license revenues related to
Daytrana that are not included in the calculation of gross margin as
presented. We estimate that approximately $1.4 million of the Daytrana
costs resulted from start-up costs associated with the initial commercial production of
Daytrana, including increased costs associated with meeting launch timelines. These
start-up costs are not expected to continue as Daytrana moves past the initial start-up
phase of production. We are also implementing
programs designed to increase Daytrana production yields and reduce manufacturing
costs, which contributed to our negative margins for Daytrana. Although no assurance can be given that these programs will be successful, we believe these
programs, coupled with the reduction or elimination of start-up expenses, will cause Daytrana
gross margins to improve significantly in the second half of 2006.
The active methylphenidate ingredient is not included in our Daytrana
product revenues or in our cost of products sold. Shire is responsible for supplying us with
the AMI used in the production of Daytrana and Shire retains title to the AMI. We
maintain AMI on hand at our manufacturing facility as consignment inventory and bear certain risks
of loss related to the AMI. These risks include the contractual obligation to reimburse Shire for
the cost of AMI if we do not meet certain minimum contractual yields of the finished product.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we reimbursed Shire approximately $0.4 million
for excess AMI used in production, which amount is included in costs of products sold.
Our ability to produce Daytrana and improve the gross margins from the sale of
this product is contingent on, among other things, receiving a sufficient supply of the AMI from Shire as well as
sufficient quota from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) for this controlled substance. At any
given time, we expect to have applications pending with the DEA for annual or additional
procurement quota that may be critical to continued production. Any delay or stoppage in the
supply of the AMI could cause us to lose revenues or incur additional costs (including those
related to expedited production), which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
26
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are summarized as
follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
Research and development |
|
$ |
2,890 |
|
|
$ |
3,033 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
$ |
6,372 |
|
|
$ |
5,926 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Research and Development
Research and development expense includes costs associated with, among other things, product
formulation, pre-clinical testing, clinical studies, regulatory and medical affairs, production for
clinical and regulatory purposes, production related development engineering for developmental
products, and the personnel associated with each of these functions.
The decline in research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was
primarily attributable to a $1.2 million decline in development engineering related to our fentanyl
transdermal system. This was partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in production for
clinical and regulatory purposes related to Daytrana and other products, $0.2 million
increase in testing supplies, $0.1 million increase in clinical trial costs and $0.1 million of
stock-based compensation.
The increase in research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was
primarily attributable to a $1.1 million increase in development engineering and production for
clinical and regulatory purposes related to Daytrana, $0.7 million increase in
pre-clinical and clinical costs related to other products under development, $0.3 million in
personnel costs, $0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense and $0.2 million increase in the
purchase of testing supplies. These increases were partially offset by a $2.3 million decline in
development engineering related to our fentanyl transdermal system.
Marketing, General and Administrative
Our increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June
30, 2006 was primarily attributable to $0.7 million in stock-based compensation, $0.6 million in
salary and related benefits and $0.1 million increase in professional fees in connection with
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the latter of which was due to the timing of
services performed. In addition, 2005 benefited from a $0.2 million reduction in product recall
related expenses. These increases were offset by a $0.2 million reduction in compensation
consulting costs.
Our increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June
30, 2006 was primarily attributable to $1.1 million in stock based compensation, a $0.6 million
increase in salary and related benefits and a $0.3 million increase in professional fees in
connection with compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the latter of which was due to the
timing of services performed. In addition, 2005 benefited from a $0.2 million reduction in product
recall related expenses. These increases were offset by a $0.1 million reduction in compensation
consulting costs.
27
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Income
Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 rose by $0.5 million and $0.6
million, respectively, due to an increase in the average cash balance, which was primarily
attributable to the $50 million milestone payment received from Shire in April 2006 in connection
with the approval of our Daytrana product by the FDA. In addition to higher average
cash balances, we invested a higher portion of our cash in short-term investments that yielded
higher interest income.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was approximately 34% and 36% for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively. The decline in our effective tax rate was primarily caused by our
non-taxable interest income exclusion representing a higher proportion of our income before taxes
thereby creating a lower effective tax rate. The higher non-taxable interest income is due to
higher investments in short term investments due to increased cash balances primarily driven by the
receipt of the $50 million Daytrana approval milestone. The provision for income taxes
is based on the Federal statutory and state income tax rates. Net deferred income tax assets are
measured using the average graduated tax rate for the estimated amount of annual taxable income in
the years that the liability is expected to be settled or the asset recovered. The effect of
adjusting the expected tax rate related to the net deferred income tax assets is included in the
provision for income taxes. As of June 30, 2006, we had a net deferred tax asset of $12.6 million.
Realization of this deferred tax asset depends upon the generation of sufficient future taxable
income. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that the
deferred income tax asset will be realized based upon estimated future taxable income.
Equity in Earnings of Novogyne
We share in the earnings of Novogyne according to an established formula after satisfaction of
an annual preferred return of $6.1 million to Novartis. Our share of Novogynes earnings (a
non-cash item) increases as Novogynes product sales increase, subject to a cap of 49%. Novogyne
produced sufficient income in the first quarters of 2006 and 2005 to meet Novartis annual
preferred return for those periods and for us to recognize earnings from Novogyne under the
formula. We report our share of Novogynes earnings as Equity in earnings of Novogyne in our
unaudited statements of operations.
28
The financial results of Novogyne for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
are summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross revenues1 |
|
$ |
35,665 |
|
|
$ |
35,211 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
72,934 |
|
|
$ |
62,545 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Sales allowances |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
7,071 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Sales returns allowances |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
291 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and returns allowances |
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
31,936 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
62,212 |
|
|
|
54,609 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales2 |
|
|
7,162 |
|
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
14,683 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
23,470 |
|
|
|
24,629 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
47,529 |
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Gross margin percentage |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
7,770 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
18,753 |
|
|
|
16,440 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,874 |
|
|
|
16,859 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
28,776 |
|
|
|
24,762 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
286 |
% |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
133 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,036 |
|
|
$ |
16,901 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
$ |
29,090 |
|
|
$ |
24,897 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novens equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
$ |
6,762 |
|
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not Meaningful
|
|
|
1 |
|
Novogynes gross revenues, which are calculated by adding sales allowances and sales
returns allowances to net revenues, are discussed in this section because Novens management
believes it is a useful measure to evaluate and compare Novogynes sales period to period in light
of the significant historic fluctuations in Novogynes sales allowances and returns. |
|
2 |
|
Novogynes costs of sales for all periods presented include the amortization of
the marketing rights Novogyne acquired for CombiPatch® of $1.5 million and $3.1 million
for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This amortization was
previously reported as a separate operating expense in Novogynes statement of operations. |
Novogyne Net Revenues
Novogynes gross revenues increased $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in sales of
Vivelle-Dot and a $0.5 million increase in unit sales of Estradot® to
Canada, partially offset by a $0.5 million decline in unit sales of
CombiPatch®. In addition, Vivelle®, our first generation estrogen patch
declined $0.4 million in unit sales. We expect to complete our planned discontinuation of
Vivelle® production by the end of 2006. The higher Vivelle-Dot unit sales
were primarily attributable to a $1.1 million increase related to pricing, offset by a $0.2 million
decrease in unit sales attributable to the timing of orders. The $0.5 million increase in sales of
Estradot® was attributable to timing of orders as sales are expected to be in line with
2005 results.
Novogyne sells its products to trade customers, including wholesalers, distributors and chain
pharmacies. As has historically been the case, the timing of purchases by trade customers is
driven by the inventory needs of each customer and other factors, and does not necessarily track
underlying prescription trends in any given period or coincide with Novogynes quarterly financial
reporting periods. As a result, the timing of orders by trade customers is difficult to predict
and can lead to significant variability in Novogynes quarterly results.
29
Approximately $0.6 million of the CombiPatch® decrease was due to a decline in unit
sales which we believe is a result of the continuing decline in the market for combination
therapies after the publication of the combination arm of the WHI and other studies on combination
therapy products as well as the impact of a competitive product. This decline was partially offset
by a $0.1 million CombiPatch® increase related to price increases.
Novogynes gross revenues increased $10.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an $11.0 million increase in sales
of Vivelle-Dot and a $0.1 million increase in sales of Estradot® to
Canada, partially offset by a $0.2 million decline in sales of CombiPatch®.
In addition, Vivelle® declined $0.5 million in unit sales. The higher
Vivelle-Dot sales were primarily attributable to an $8.3 million increase in unit sales
as well as a $2.7 million increase related to pricing. The increase in unit sales is a result of
the higher prescription trends as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in
sales of Estradot® were attributable to the same factors as discussed above for the
three month comparable periods. The decline in CombiPatch® is primarily attributable to
a $0.5 million decline in unit sales as a result of the declining market and the impact of a
competitive product, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase related to pricing.
Sales allowances consist of chargebacks, Medicaid rebates, managed healthcare rebates, cash
discounts and other allowances, which tend to fluctuate based on changes in gross revenues. These
sales allowances were 10% of gross revenues for each of the three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, and 10% and 11% of gross revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Sales returns allowances consist of: (i) allowances for returns of expiring product, and (ii)
allowances for returns for product recalls. The activity for sales returns allowances for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Changes in allowances for returns of expiring product |
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
|
$ |
(338 |
) |
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
Changes in allowances for returns for product recalls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in sales returns allowances |
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
$ |
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual returns for expiring product |
|
$ |
(1,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(767 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,695 |
) |
Actual returns for product recalls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual returns for the period |
|
$ |
(1,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(807 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in allowances for returns of expiring product for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 was primarily related to higher expected returns as a result of increased sales
of Vivelle-Dot as well as higher actual returns of CombiPatch®. In
addition, the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 benefited from a reduction in allowances of
expiring product due to lower expected returns as a result of a decline in actual returns of
Vivelle® at the time. The current three and six month period did not benefit from such
a reduction.
Novogyne Gross Margin
Novogynes gross margin was consistent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to the same periods of the prior year.
30
Novogyne Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Novogynes selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30,
2006 increased $1.8 million compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to a $0.9 million
increase in sample expense due to timing of shipments from Noven, a $0.7 million increase in
administrative, advertising and promotional expenses and a $0.5 million
increase in litigation expenses related to HT litigation.
Novogynes selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006
increased $2.3 million compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to a $1.0 million
increase in sample expense due to timing of shipments, a $0.7 million increase in
administrative, advertising and promotional expenses and a $0.7 million
increase in litigation expenses related to HT litigation.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had the following (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,570 |
|
|
$ |
66,964 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
114,660 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
137,656 |
|
|
|
91,122 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Cash flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
45,619 |
|
|
$ |
(12,206 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(101,766 |
) |
|
|
(49,423 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily
resulted from the receipt of $50.0 million related to the Daytrana approval and $10.2
million in cash distributions from Novogyne. These receipts were offset by changes in working
capital due to the timing of certain payments, including those related to insurance, compensation
and related liabilities and payments to Shire for clinical trial costs incurred in connection with
obtaining Daytrana regulatory approval.
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily
resulted from changes in working capital due to the timing of certain payments, including those
related to expenses incurred in pursuit of Daytrana regulatory approval, purchases of
fentanyl, compensation and related liabilities and insurance payments. These payments were offset
by $8.9 million in distributions from Novogyne.
31
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily
attributable to $96.8 million in net purchases of short-term investments, as well as the purchase
of $4.4 million in fixed assets to expand production capacity for future products.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was primarily
attributable to $44.6 million in net purchases of short-term investments, as well as the purchase
of $4.6 million in fixed assets to expand production capacity for future products. Beginning in
the first quarter of 2005, Noven invested a portion of its cash in short-term investments, which
primarily consist of investment grade, asset backed, variable rate debt obligations and municipal
auction rate securities, which are categorized as available-for-sale under the provisions of SFAS
No. 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005 was primarily attributable to $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, received in
connection with the issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options.
Short-Term and Long-Term Liquidity
Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are existing cash, cash generated from product
sales, fees and royalties under development and license agreements and distributions from Novogyne.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, all of our income before income taxes was comprised of
equity in earnings of Novogyne, a non-cash item. Accordingly, our net income may not be reflective
of our short-term liquidity. Although we expect to receive distributions from Novogyne, there can
be no assurance that Novogyne will have sufficient profits or cash flow to pay distributions or
that Novogynes Management Committee will authorize such distributions.
Our short-term cash flow is dependent on sales, royalties and license fees associated with our
transdermal products. Any decrease in sales of those products by us or our licensees or any
increase in returns of products to Novogyne (including any such changes resulting from the HT
studies), the further decline of the HT market, or the inability or failure of Novogyne to pay
distributions would have a material adverse effect on our short-term cash flow and require us to
rely on our existing cash balances or on borrowings to support our operations and business.
In April 2006, Noven received a $50 million milestone payment from Shire as a result of the
approval of Daytrana, and Noven may also earn up to three additional $25 million
milestone payments upon Shires achievement of $25 million, $50 million and $75 million in annual
net sales of Daytrana, respectively. Shire commercially launched the product in June
2006.
Capital expenditures were $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. We expect to
continue to invest in capital expenditures during 2006 as we continue to expand our manufacturing
and storage facilities for products under development, but we expect such expenditures to be
significantly below 2005 levels. We expect to fund these capital expenditures from our existing
cash balances. As a general matter, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity available to meet
our operating needs and anticipated short-term capital requirements.
For our long-term operating needs, we intend to utilize funds derived from the above sources,
as well as funds generated through sales of products under development or products that we may
license or acquire from others. We expect that such funds will be comprised of payments received
pursuant to future development and licensing arrangements, as well as possible direct sales of our
own products. We expect that our cash requirements will generally continue to increase, primarily
to
32
fund plant and equipment purchases to expand production capacity for new products. If our
products under development with Shire, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and others are successful, these expenditures, which may include the cost of building an
additional manufacturing plant, are expected to be significant.
We cannot assure that we will successfully complete the development of such products, that we
will obtain regulatory approval for any such products, that any approved product may be produced in
commercial quantities, at reasonable costs, and be successfully marketed, or that we will
successfully negotiate future licensing or product acquisition arrangements. Because much of the
cost associated with product development and expansion of manufacturing facilities is incurred
prior to product launch, if we are unsuccessful in out-licensing, or if we are unable to launch
additional commercially-viable products that we develop or that we license or acquire from others,
we will have incurred the up-front costs associated with product development or acquisition without
the benefit of the liquidity generated by sales of those products, which could adversely affect our
long-term liquidity needs. Factors that could impact our ability to develop or acquire and launch
additional commercially-viable products are discussed in Part I Item 1A of our Form 10-K as well
as in Part II Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Our cash and short-term investments are available for potential strategic acquisitions of
technologies, products or businesses complementary to our business. We may also consider issuing
equity securities to fund potential acquisitions. To the extent our existing cash and short-term
investments are insufficient to fund any large-scale acquisitions we may be required to seek debt
financing or to issue debt securities. If a material acquisition is completed, our results of
operations and financial condition could change materially in future periods.
In addition, although we have not repurchased any of our common stock since 2003, it is
possible that a portion of our cash and short-term investments could be used to repurchase Noven
common stock under our previously-announced stock repurchase program. Stock repurchases, if
any, may be made in the open market, including pursuant to a trading program under Rule 10b5-1
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
To the extent that capital requirements exceed available capital, we will seek alternative
sources of financing to fund our operations. No assurance can be given that alternative financing
will be available, if at all, in a timely manner or on favorable terms. If we are unable to obtain
satisfactory alternative financing, we may be required to delay or reduce our proposed
expenditures, including expenditures for research and development and plant and equipment, in order
to meet our future cash requirements.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes outside of the ordinary course of our business since
December 31, 2005 to our aggregate contractual obligations previously disclosed in our Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates
For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Estimates, which
is included in our Form 10-K, as updated and supplemented by the following:
Stock-Based Compensation
We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
options and SSARs. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date
of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
33
regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock
price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee equity award exercise
behaviors, risk-free interest rate, expected forfeiture rates and expected dividends.
We estimate the expected term of options granted by taking the average of the vesting term and
the contractual term of the option, as described in SAB 107. We estimate the volatility of common
stock by using a combination of both historical and implied volatility based on an equal weighting
of each as management believes it is the expected volatility that marketplace participants would
likely use in determining an exchange price for an option. We base the risk-free interest rate that
we use in the option pricing model on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar
to the expected term on the options. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option pricing
model. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data to
estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those
awards that are expected to vest. All share based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation
expense in future periods or if we decide to use a different valuation model, the future periods
may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially
affect our operating income, net income and net income per share. The Black-Scholes option-pricing
model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable, characteristics not present in our option grants.
Existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes and lattice binomial models, may not provide
reliable measures of the fair values of our stock-based compensation. Consequently, there is a
risk that our estimates of the fair values of our stock-based compensation awards on the grant
dates may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration,
early termination or forfeiture of those stock-based payments in the future. Stock options or
SSARs may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero
intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and
reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments
that are significantly higher than the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and
reported in our financial statements. There currently is no market-based mechanism or other
practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the estimates stemming from these
valuation models, nor is there a means to compare and adjust the estimates to actual values.
The guidance in SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107 is relatively new. The application of these principles
may be subject to further interpretation and refinement over time. There are significant
differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility that we will adopt different
valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and
materially affect the fair value estimate of stock-based payments. It may also result in a lack of
comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48 to clarify the accounting for uncertainties related to
income taxes that are recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS
109. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process.
The first step is recognition, which requires an enterprise to determine whether it is more likely
than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of
the position. The second step is measurement, which requires a company to recognize a tax position
that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective
as of the beginning of the first annual
34
reporting period that begins after December 15, 2006. As
we believe we currently perform both the recognition and measurement process prescribed by FIN 48,
we do not expect that the adoption of this interpretation will have a material impact on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Outlook
A summary of our current financial guidance is provided below. This forward-looking
information is based on our current assumptions and expectations, many of which are beyond our
control to achieve. In particular, for purposes of this guidance we have assumed, among other
things, that during the remainder of 2006 there will not be any material:
|
|
|
transactions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in Novens or Novogynes accounting or accounting principles (except as
indicated below with respect to Novens method of accounting for stock-based compensation) or
any of the estimates or judgments underlying our critical accounting policies; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory, technological or clinical study developments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the supply of, demand for, or distribution of our
HT products or Daytrana,
(including any
changes resulting from competitive HT or ADHD products, product recalls, or new HT or ADHD study results); |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in supply of AMI necessary for the production
of Daytrana, whether due to the failure to receive sufficient procurement quota
from the DEA, Shires inability to provide us with AMI or otherwise; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our business relationships/collaborations; or |
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy or the health care sector generally. |
Financial guidance is inherently uncertain. Accordingly, we cannot assure that we will achieve
results consistent with this guidance, and our actual financial results could differ materially
from the expected results discussed below. For a discussion of certain factors that may impact
our actual financial results for the periods referenced, readers should carefully consider the
risks, uncertainties and cautionary factors discussed in Part I Item 1A of our Form 10-K and in
Part II Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Stock-Based Compensation Expenses. Effective as of the first quarter of 2006, we adopted SFAS
123(R), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. As a result, our Statements of Operations in 2006
and subsequent periods will include significant expenses associated with stock-based compensation
that were not included in 2005 and prior periods. Based on the expense associated with stock-based
compensation previously awarded, and our estimate of the expense associated with such compensation
that may be awarded in the course of 2006, we estimate that our total stock-based compensation
expenses for full-year 2006 will be approximately $3.5 million, including approximately $1.5
million of such expenses recorded in the first six months of 2006. The specific financial guidance
provided below includes expected increases resulting from the expensing of stock-based
compensation.
Daytrana. On April 6, 2006, our amended NDA for Daytrana was approved
for marketing by the FDA. On April 7, 2006, we received a $50 million milestone payment from Shire
(the global licensee of the product) as a result of the approval, and we may also earn up to three
additional $25 million milestone payments depending on the level of Shires commercial sales of the
product. We expect to defer and recognize approval and sales milestones as license revenues on a straight-line basis through the first quarter of 2013, which is our current best estimate of the useful
economic life of the product. We began recognizing the $50 million milestone payment, as well as
the balance of the Shire deferred license revenues ($4.8 million at March 31, 2006), in the second
quarter of 2006.
35
HT Product Revenues. Given customer orders, prescription trends and other factors, we expect
HT product revenues for full-year 2006 to approximate 2005 levels.
Gross Margin. Over the past two years, we expanded our facilities and increased staffing for
the production of fentanyl, Daytrana and other developmental products. Our results of
operations and gross margins for future periods are expected to continue to be adversely affected
by these actions and the related continuing overhead expenses unless and until we are able to
improve the utilization of these resources through the commercialization of additional products or
reduce overhead expenses, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to improve the
utilization or meaningfully reduce overhead. In addition, our overall gross margin in the first
half of 2006 was materially and adversely affected by costs and inefficiencies associated with the
start-up of commercial production of Daytrana. We are working to reduce costs and
improve yields, and although we cannot assure that we will be successful, we expect to report
significant improvement in our overall gross margin in the second half of 2006 compared to first
half levels.
Research and Development. We expect our research and development expense in 2006 to increase
in the 10% range compared to full-year 2005 levels. We are working to formulate certain new
transdermal products that, if successfully formulated, may enter human studies during 2006. These
studies, if initiated, would be funded by Noven and would cause our research and development
expense in 2006 to increase substantially over 2005 levels.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense. We expect
Novens marketing, general and
administrative expense to increase in the
20% 25% range over 2005 levels, primarily reflecting
stock-based compensation expenses that commenced in 2006.
Novogyne. Based on current prescription trends and other factors, we expect
an increase in Novogynes full-year 2006 net income approaching 10% over 2005 levels.
Effective Tax Rate. We estimate that our effective tax rate for full-year 2006 will be in the
33% to 35% range.
Capital Expenditures. We expect our capital expenditures for full-year 2006 to decrease
significantly compared to 2005 levels.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this
report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we reviewed our internal controls, and
there have not been any changes in our internal controls or in other factors that are reasonably
likely to affect those controls subsequent to the date of the last evaluation. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in alerting them to material information relating to us to
allow timely decisions regarding disclosure of information required to be included in our periodic
Securities and Exchange Commission filings. However, that conclusion should be considered in light
of the various limitations described below on the effectiveness of those controls and procedures,
some of which pertain to most if not all business enterprises, and some of which arise as a result
of the nature of our business. Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does
36
not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all
error and all improper conduct. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints,
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of improper conduct, if any, have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented
by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management
override of the control. Further, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with
the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Furthermore, our level of historical and current equity participation in Novogyne may substantially
impact the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Because we do not control
Novogyne, and all of Novogynes financial, accounting, inventory, distribution, revenues and sales
deductions functions are performed by Novartis, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect
to Novogyne are necessarily more limited than those we maintain with respect to ourselves. No
significant changes were made in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect these controls subsequent to the date of the Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial
Officers evaluation.
Provided with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are certificates of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We are required to provide those certifications by Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Securities and Exchange Commissions implementing
regulations. This Item 4 of this quarterly report is the information concerning the evaluation
referred
to in those certifications, and you should read this information in conjunction with those
certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In September 2005, Noven, Novogyne and Novartis were served with a summons and complaint from
an individual plaintiff in Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Atlantic County in which the
plaintiff claims personal injury allegedly arising from the use of HT products, including
Vivelle®. The plaintiff claims compensatory, punitive and other damages in an
unspecified amount. We do not expect any activity in this case in the near future, as
the court has indicated that it intends to stay proceedings in all its pending and future HT cases
except for cases where Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and its affiliates and Pfizer, Inc. are the
defendants.
In April 2006, an individual plaintiff and her husband filed a complaint in the United States
District Court, District of Minnesota against Noven, Novogyne, Novartis, Wyeth Inc. and Wyeth
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. alleging liability in connection with personal injury claims allegedly
arising from the use of HT products, including our CombiPatch® product. The plaintiffs
claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified amount.
In July 2006, four complaints were filed in the United States District Court, District of
Minnesota against Noven and other pharmaceutical companies by four separate individual plaintiffs,
each filing alone or with her husband. Three of the complaints also name Novartis as a defendant,
and of these, two name Novogyne as a defendant as well. Each complaint alleges liability in
connection with personal injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT products, including
Vivelle® in one case and CombiPatch® in two of the cases. The plaintiffs in
each case claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified amount.
Novartis has advised us that Novartis has been named as a defendant in at least 26 additional
lawsuits that include approximately 33 plaintiffs that allege liability in connection with personal
injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT patches distributed and sold by Novartis and
Novogyne, including our Vivelle-Dot, Vivelle®, and CombiPatch®
products. In addition, in July 2006, Novartis was named as a defendant in at least 71 additional
lawsuits (along with several other defendants) in which the plaintiffs complaints do not identify
the HT products used by the plaintiffs and therefore these cases may also involve our HT products.
Novogyne has been named as a defendant in one lawsuit in addition to the four lawsuits referenced
above. Novartis has indicated that it will seek indemnification from Noven and Novogyne to the
extent permitted by the agreements between and among Novartis, Novogyne and Noven.
We intend to defend all of the foregoing lawsuits vigorously, but the outcome of these product
liability lawsuits cannot ultimately be predicted.
We are a party to other pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business,
none of which we believe is material to our financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as described below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously
disclosed in our Form 10-K. These risk factors may cause our results to differ from the
forward-looking statements made in this report or otherwise made by or on our behalf. The risks
and uncertainties described in the Form 10-K are not listed in order of priority and are not the
only ones we face. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and
results of operations would suffer. Additional risks not presently known to us or other factors not
perceived by us to present significant risks to our business at this time also may impair our
business operation. We do not undertake to update any of these forward-looking statements or to
announce the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements except as required by
law.
38
If we are unable to improve our margins on Daytrana our results of operations will
be adversely affected.
The price at which we sell Daytrana to Shire is determined in accordance with the
terms of our Toll Conversion and Supply Agreement with Shire. Because the price at which we sell
Daytrana to Shire is generally fixed, our margin on sales of Daytrana is
determined by the production costs we incur to produce the product. For both the three months and
the six months ended June 30, 2006, our gross margin on Daytrana was negative (i.e. the
costs we incurred to produce the product were greater than the revenue we realized from the sales
of that product). The negative gross margin resulted primarily from start-up
expenses associated with the production of Daytrana, and production inefficiencies including lower than desired
yields and increased costs associated with meeting launch
timelines. If we are unable to improve production yields and reduce our costs of production for Daytrana, we will be
unable to improve our margin on sales of the product and our operating results will be adversely
affected. Our ability to produce Daytrana and improve the gross margins from the sale
of this product is contingent on, among other things, receiving a sufficient supply of the AMI from
Shire as well as sufficient quota from the DEA for this controlled substance. At any given time,
we expect to have applications pending with the DEA for annual or additional procurement quota that
may be critical to continued production. Any delay or stoppage in the supply of the AMI could
cause us to lose revenues or incur additional costs (including those related to expedited
production), which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
39
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information with respect to our stock repurchases during the
first quarter of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of |
|
That May Yet |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Publicly |
|
be Purchased |
|
|
Shares |
|
Paid |
|
Announced |
|
under the |
|
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Program |
|
Program(1) |
April 1, 2006 to
April 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,711,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2006 to
May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,711,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 to
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,711,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,711,040 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In March 2003, we announced a stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up
to $25.0 million of our Common Stock. There is no expiration date specified for this
program. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The following proposals were approved at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 23,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Sidney Braginsky |
|
|
21,220,785 |
|
|
|
442,153 |
|
John G. Clarkson, M.D. |
|
|
21,439,298 |
|
|
|
223,640 |
|
Donald A. Denkhaus |
|
|
21,547,119 |
|
|
|
115,819 |
|
Pedro P. Granadillo |
|
|
21,480,199 |
|
|
|
182,739 |
|
Robert G. Savage |
|
|
21,480,299 |
|
|
|
182,639 |
|
Robert C. Strauss |
|
|
21,530,540 |
|
|
|
132,398 |
|
Wayne P. Yetter |
|
|
21,533,445 |
|
|
|
129,493 |
|
|
2. |
|
Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Novens
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstained |
21,608,167
|
|
10,279
|
|
44,492 |
40
Item 6. Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of Novens Form 8-K dated May 22, 2006 (File No. 0-17254)) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Changes to Compensation and Reimbursement Practices for Non-employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to Novens Form 8-K dated May 22, 2006 (File
No. 0-17254)) |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Robert C. Strauss, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Diane M. Barrett, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Robert C. Strauss, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Diane M. Barrett, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
41
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2006
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Diane M.
Barrett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diane M. Barrett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
42