Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
Commission file number 0-17254
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
STATE OF DELAWARE
|
|
59-2767632 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
11960 S.W. 144th Street, Miami, FL 33186
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(305) 253-5099
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the last practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Common stock $.0001 par value
|
|
24,361,178 |
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX
Cautionary Factors: Statements in this report that are not descriptions of historical facts are
forward-looking statements provided under the safe harbor protection of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results, performance and achievements may be materially
different from those expressed or implied by such statements and readers should consider the risks
and uncertainties associated with our business that are discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and in Item 1A of Part II of any
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission since the
filing of our Form 10-K, as well as other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Trademark Information: Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot, Estradot® and
Menorest are trademarks of Novartis AG or its affiliated companies; CombiPatch® and
Estalis® are registered trademarks of Vivelle
Ventures LLC; Intrinsa is a trademark of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and
Daytrana is a trademark of Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Statements of Operations
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
$ |
13,990 |
|
|
$ |
14,432 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
5,138 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues Novogyne |
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
19,128 |
|
|
|
19,049 |
|
Product revenues third parties |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
15,648 |
|
|
|
11,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues |
|
|
12,825 |
|
|
|
10,447 |
|
|
|
34,776 |
|
|
|
30,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
License |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
15,708 |
|
|
|
12,240 |
|
|
|
43,447 |
|
|
|
35,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold Novogyne |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
Cost of products sold third parties |
|
|
5,339 |
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
16,764 |
|
|
|
17,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products sold |
|
|
9,041 |
|
|
|
15,416 |
|
|
|
27,068 |
|
|
|
26,526 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
9,752 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
12,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
17,578 |
|
|
|
23,479 |
|
|
|
52,353 |
|
|
|
48,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
(11,239 |
) |
|
|
(8,906 |
) |
|
|
(13,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
8,234 |
|
|
|
8,081 |
|
|
|
19,323 |
|
|
|
17,094 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
13,307 |
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,031 |
|
|
$ |
(1,422 |
) |
|
$ |
8,868 |
|
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,954 |
|
|
|
23,586 |
|
|
|
23,768 |
|
|
|
23,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,574 |
|
|
|
23,586 |
|
|
|
24,142 |
|
|
|
24,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,676 |
|
|
$ |
66,964 |
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
130,510 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Accounts receivable trade (less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $47 in 2006 and $53 in 2005) |
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
Accounts receivable Novogyne, net |
|
|
7,783 |
|
|
|
8,912 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
8,134 |
|
|
|
7,861 |
|
Net deferred income tax asset, current portion |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,882 |
|
|
|
119,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
37,414 |
|
|
|
34,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne |
|
|
22,710 |
|
|
|
23,243 |
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
Patent development costs, net |
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
31,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244,823 |
|
|
$ |
185,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
4,824 |
|
|
$ |
5,812 |
|
Capital lease obligation current portion |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Accrued liability Shire |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
4,729 |
|
|
|
5,771 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Deferred contract revenues |
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Deferred license revenues current portion |
|
|
11,174 |
|
|
|
7,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,706 |
|
|
|
28,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Deferred license revenues |
|
|
55,936 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,495 |
|
|
|
45,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 100,000 shares of $.01 par
value; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized 80,000,000 shares,
par value $.0001 per share; issued and
outstanding 24,294,309 at September 30,
2006 and
23,617,221 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
102,685 |
|
|
|
89,846 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
59,641 |
|
|
|
50,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,328 |
|
|
|
140,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244,823 |
|
|
$ |
185,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,868 |
|
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
Write-off of fentanyl inventories deemed non-saleable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of patent costs |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred rent credit |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Income tax benefits on exercise of stock options |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
Recognition of deferred license revenues |
|
|
(7,559 |
) |
|
|
(3,017 |
) |
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
(19,323 |
) |
|
|
(17,094 |
) |
Distributions from Novogyne |
|
|
17,644 |
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable trade, net |
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
2,430 |
|
Decrease in accounts receivable Novogyne, net |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
Increase in accounts receivable Endo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,467 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
Decrease in prepaid income taxes |
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
Increase in prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in deposits and other assets |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
(5,346 |
) |
Decrease in accrued liability Shire |
|
|
(5,069 |
) |
|
|
(5,608 |
) |
Decrease in accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
Increase in other accrued liabilities |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred contract revenue, net |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
Increase in deferred license revenue |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred compensation liability |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recoverable from (reimburseable to) Shire and offset against
deferred license revenue related to Daytrana approval |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(5,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
51,124 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(5,823 |
) |
|
|
(10,462 |
) |
Payments for patent development costs, net |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
Purchase of company-owned life insurance |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(1,012,385 |
) |
|
|
(340,590 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
899,775 |
|
|
|
289,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(119,157 |
) |
|
|
(61,697 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from exercise of stock options |
|
|
8,080 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
Payments under capital leases |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Excess tax deduction from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(58,288 |
) |
|
|
(61,618 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
66,964 |
|
|
|
93,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
8,676 |
|
|
$ |
32,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:
Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Noven) was incorporated in Delaware in 1987 and is engaged
in the research, development, manufacture and marketing of advanced transdermal drug delivery
technologies and prescription transdermal products.
Noven and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis) entered into a joint venture,
Vivelle Ventures LLC (d/b/a Novogyne Pharmaceuticals) (Novogyne), effective May 1, 1998, to
market and sell womens prescription healthcare products in the United States and Canada.
These products include Novens transdermal estrogen delivery systems marketed under the brand
names Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch®. Noven accounts
for its 49% investment in Novogyne under the equity method and reports its share of Novogynes
earnings as Equity in earnings of Novogyne on its statements of operations. Noven defers the
recognition of 49% of its profit on products sold to Novogyne until the products are sold by
Novogyne to third party customers.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
In managements opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of
Noven contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Noven as of September 30,
2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005. Novens business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, those set forth in Part I Item 1A of Novens Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (Form 10-K) and in Part II Item 1A -
Risk Factors of any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed by Noven with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) since the filing of Novens Form 10-K, as well as in other
reports filed from time to time with the SEC. Accordingly, the results of operations and cash
flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are not, and should not
be construed as, necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows which may be
reported for the remainder of 2006 or for periods thereafter.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the SEC for reporting on Form 10-Q. Pursuant to such rules and
regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been condensed or omitted. The unaudited condensed financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to the financial
statements included in Novens Form 10-K. The accounting policies followed for interim
financial reporting are the same as those disclosed in Note 2 of the notes to the financial
statements included in Novens Form 10-K, as updated and supplemented by the following:
VENDOR DISCOUNTS:
Noven receives purchase-volume-related discounts and rebates from vendors in the normal
course of business. Management uses projected purchase volumes to estimate accrual rates,
validates those projections based on actual purchase trends and applies those rates to actual
purchase volumes to determine the amount of funds accrued by Noven and receivable
6
from the
vendor. Amounts accrued could be impacted if actual purchase volumes differ from projected
purchase volumes. Purchase-volume-related discounts or rebates are treated as a reduction of
inventory cost or cost of products sold, depending on whether the related inventory is on-hand
or has been previously sold.
3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS:
Cash and cash equivalents includes all highly liquid investments with an original maturity
of three months or less at the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30,
2006, and December 31, 2005, consisted primarily of overnight money market accounts, time
deposits, commercial paper and money market funds with original maturities of three months or
less at the date of purchase. Noven has invested a majority of its cash in short-term
investments, which primarily consist of investment grade, asset backed, variable rate debt
obligations and municipal auction rate securities, which are categorized as available-for-sale
under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Despite the long-term
nature of their stated contractual maturities, these securities have provisions that allow for
liquidation in the short-term. Accordingly, the short-term investments are reported at fair
value, with any related unrealized gains and losses included in comprehensive income as a
separate component of stockholders equity, net of applicable taxes. As of September 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, the cost of all short-term investments approximated fair value. No
unrealized gains and losses have been recognized for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Realized gains and losses, interest, and dividends are included in
interest income or interest expense, as appropriate.
4. RECLASSIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS:
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform
to the current periods presentation. Cost of products sold has been revised for the prior
period to include certain amounts previously included in research and development expenses.
5. CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments for income taxes were $0.8 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Under Novens stock-based compensation arrangements, there can be increases in the value of
equity instruments issued under those arrangements that are not recognizable as an expense for
accounting purposes but are deductible in determining taxable income. Noven would have paid an
additional $1.7 million in income taxes for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 had these
increases not been deductible from taxable income. Cash payments for interest were not material for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Non-cash Operating Activities
In 2002, the State of New Jersey enacted legislation that requires Novogyne to remit
estimated state income tax payments on behalf of its owners, Noven and Novartis. In April 2006
and 2005, Novogyne paid $2.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, to the New Jersey
Department of Revenue, representing Novens portion of Novogynes estimated state income tax
payment. These payments were deemed a distribution to Noven from Novogyne.
Non-cash Investing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Noven recorded approximately $0.9 million
in leasehold improvements as a deferred rent credit as the landlord paid for the applicable
leasehold improvements.
7
6. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No.
48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) to clarify the accounting for
uncertainties related to income taxes that are recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The evaluation of
a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. The first step is recognition,
which requires an enterprise to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax
position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The
second step is measurement, which requires a company to recognize a tax position that meets the
more likely than not recognition threshold at the largest amount of benefit that is greater
than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective as
of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2006.
Noven is currently assessing FIN 48 and is unable to estimate the impact it will have on its
results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108), which
added Section N to Topic 1, Financial Statements, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series.
Section N provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements
when quantifying current year financial statement misstatements for the purpose of materiality
assessment. The SEC concluded in SAB 108 that a registrants materiality evaluation of an
identified unadjusted error should quantify the impact of correcting all misstatements,
including both the carryover and reversing effects of prior year misstatements, on the current
year financial statements. If either the carryover or reversing effects of prior year
misstatements is material, the misstatements should be corrected in the current year. If
correcting an error in the current year for prior year misstatements causes the current year to
be materially misstated, the prior
year financial statements should be corrected, even though such revision previously was
and continues to be immaterial to the prior year financial statements. Correcting prior year
financial statements for immaterial errors would not require previously filed reports to be
amended. Such correction may be made the next time the registrant files the prior year
financial statements. The guidance of SAB 108 should be applied in the annual financial
statements covering the fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006.
7. INVENTORIES:
The following are the major classes of inventories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Pre-launch |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Pre-launch |
|
|
Total |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
4,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,134 |
|
|
$ |
5,460 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
7,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-launch inventories as of December 31, 2005 consisted of Novens Daytrana
product, which received final approval from the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in April 2006 and was commercially launched in June 2006. Provisions
have been made to reduce inventories to net realizable value.
8
Certain materials and compounds are available from limited sources and, in some cases, a
single supplier. While Noven has not, to date, experienced any difficulty acquiring from its
suppliers materials necessary to manufacture its products, no assurance can be given that Noven
will not experience such difficulty in the future. In addition, the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) controls access to controlled substances, including methylphenidate, the active
ingredient in Daytrana. Manufacturers of products containing controlled substances
must annually apply to the DEA for procurement quota in order to obtain these substances for
manufacturing. In 2006, Noven received an initial grant of methylphenidate quota and has
submitted supplemental applications for additional quota in order to fulfill the 2006 product
orders received from Shire plc (Shire). The DEA, which grants quota based primarily on
historical product sales and prescription data, has not, to date, granted Novens requests for
additional 2006 quota. While Noven and Shire continue to work with the DEA to obtain additional
methylphenidate quota for the remainder of 2006, Noven cannot assure that it will be successful
in convincing the DEA that additional quota is necessary to meet patient demand. Because Noven
has not received additional quota for 2006, Noven expects to complete the year with
approximately $8.0 million in full-year Daytrana product sales to Shire and
approximately $2.0 million in Daytrana product backorders that Noven would expect
to fulfill following the receipt of its expected 2007 quota supply in the first quarter of 2007.
Other than products produced for commercial sale, Novens policy is to immediately
recognize as expense all inventory purchased for research and development purposes.
Shire retains title to the active methylphenidate ingredient (AMI) in
Daytrana. AMI is not included in Daytrana product revenues or in
Novens cost of products sold. Noven records AMI maintained at its manufacturing facility as
consignment inventory and bears certain manufacturing risks of loss related to the AMI. These
risks include the contractual obligation of
Noven to reimburse Shire for the cost of AMI if Noven does not meet certain minimum yields
of the finished product. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, Noven used $2.7
million of AMI in the finished product and reimbursed Shire approximately $0.1 million and $0.5
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, for excess AMI
used in production, which amount is included in cost of products
sold. Noven had $1.2 million
of consignment AMI inventory on hand at September 30, 2006, which is not reflected in the table
above.
8. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS:
Prior to January 1, 2006, all awards granted to employees under the 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan) were stock options. In 2006, Noven began granting
stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) to employees and nonvested shares
(restricted stock) to non-employee directors in lieu of stock options.
At September 30, 2006, there were 3,257,091 stock options and 28,726 SSARs issued and
outstanding under the 1999 Plan. Since November 21, 2004, stock options and SSARs granted
under the 1999 Plan have had a vesting period of four years, beginning one year after date of
grant, and expire seven years after date of grant.
In May 2006, Noven issued a total of 34,344 shares of restricted stock to its non-employee
directors. The grants fall under the definition of nonvested shares under SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). The shares vest over each directors
one-year service period at the end of each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended
June 30, 2006.
During the first quarter of 2006, Noven adopted the provisions of, and began accounting for
stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS 123(R). Under the fair value
9
recognition
provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based
on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Noven elected the
modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes.
The valuation provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding
as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Estimated compensation for grants that
were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period
using the grant date fair value previously calculated for the SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) pro forma disclosures requisite.
Noven currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options and SSARs. The grant date fair value of stock-based payment awards using an
option-pricing model is affected by Novens stock price as well as assumptions regarding a
number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include Novens expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee equity award exercise
behaviors, risk-free interest rate, estimated forfeitures of awards and expected dividends.
Noven estimates the expected term of options granted by taking the average of the vesting
term and the contractual term of the option, as described in the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin
Topic 14: Share-Based Payment (SAB 107) (SAB 107). Noven estimates the volatility of common
stock by using a combination of both historical and implied volatility based on an equal
weighting of each as management believes it is the expected volatility that marketplace
participants would likely use in determining an exchange price for an option. Noven bases the
risk-free interest rate that Noven uses in the option valuation model on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options. Noven does
not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore uses an
expected
dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. Noven is required to estimate
forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Noven uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting
option forfeitures and records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are
expected to vest. All stock-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. The
assumptions used to value option grants for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and September
30, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Volatility |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
5.17 |
% |
|
|
3.88 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
10
Total stock-based compensation recognized in Novens statements of operations for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
2,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit recognized related to
compensation expense |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of inventory or fixed
assets for the period ended September 30, 2006.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), Noven presented all tax benefits for deductions
resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of
incentive stock options as operating cash flows on its statement of cash flows. SFAS 123(R)
requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense, determined
on an individual award basis, to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an
operating cash flow. This requirement has the effect of reducing net operating cash flows and
increasing net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. However, under this requirement,
total cash flow remains unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting
rules. Cash received from options exercised under all share-based payment arrangements for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
The tax benefit realized on the tax deductions from option exercises under stock-based compensation
arrangements totaled $2.4 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, of which $1.7 million was reported as a financing cash flow for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. There were no amounts reported as financing cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Stock option transactions related to the plans are summarized as follows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 (options / SSARs and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Options/ |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
SSARs |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Term |
|
Outstanding at
beginning of the period |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
$ |
17.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
11.99 |
|
|
$ |
6,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled and expired |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
12.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end
of the period |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
$ |
18.32 |
|
|
$ |
23,087 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable
at end of period |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
$ |
20.91 |
|
|
$ |
11,313 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The following table summarizes information concerning Novens restricted stock at September
30, 2006 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
17.47 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
17.47 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
17.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation expense that Noven expects to record
in future periods related to currently outstanding unvested stock options, SSARs and restricted
stock, as determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R), is approximately $5.4 million before the
effect of income taxes, of which $0.8 million, $2.5 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million is
expected to be incurred in the remainder of 2006 and in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The
weighted-average period over which this compensation cost is expected to be recognized is 2
years.
Prior to 2006, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), Noven
elected to continue to apply the provisions of the Accounting Principles Boards Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations in
accounting for its employee stock option plans. Therefore no stock-based employee compensation
cost is reflected in net income for the three months ended September 30, 2005, as all options
granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant.
12
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 if Noven had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(1,422 |
) |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(12,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(1,571 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
In order to eliminate some of the future compensation expense that Noven would otherwise
have recognized in its statements of operations under SFAS 123(R), during 2005 Noven
accelerated the vesting of certain stock options under the 1999 Plan. As a result of this
action, options to purchase approximately 1.1 million shares of Novens common stock became
immediately exercisable, including options held by Novens executive officers to purchase
approximately 455,000 shares. Noven recorded an immaterial charge to compensation expense
during the fourth quarter of 2005 due to the acceleration of a nominal amount of in-the-money
options. As a result of the acceleration, during 2005, approximately $10.1 million of
compensation expense, net of applicable income taxes, was eliminated from Novens future
statements of operations and included in the pro forma footnote disclosure for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
9. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN:
Effective January 1, 2006, Noven established a deferred compensation plan (the Plan)
available to Novens officers and members of its Board of Directors. The Plan permits
participants to defer receipt of part of their current compensation to a later date as part of
their personal retirement or financial planning. Participants may elect to defer, as
applicable, portions of their director fees, base salary, bonus, long-term incentive plan
awards, and/or restricted stock grants. Benefit security for the Plan is provided by a funded
rabbi trust.
The compensation withheld from Plan participants, together with investment income on the
Plan, is reflected as a deferred compensation obligation to participants and is classified as a
long-term liability in the accompanying condensed balance sheets. The related assets, which
are held in the rabbi trust in the form of a company-owned life insurance policy that names
Noven as the beneficiary, are classified within other assets in the accompanying condensed
balance sheets and are reported at cash surrender value, which was approximately $0.2 million
as of
September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, the balance of the deferred compensation
liability totaled $0.1 million.
13
10. CONTRACT AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS:
Shire
On April 6, 2006, Novens amended New Drug Application (NDA) for Daytrana
was approved for marketing by the FDA. In April 2006, Noven received a $50 million milestone
payment from Shire (the global licensee of the product) as a result of the approval, and Noven
may also earn additional milestone payments of up to $75 million depending on the level of
Shires commercial sales of the product. The product was commercially launched by Shire in
June 2006. Noven expects to defer and recognize approval and sales milestones as license
revenues on a straight-line basis through the first quarter of 2013, which is Novens current
best estimate of the useful economic life of the product. Noven began recognizing the $50
million milestone payment as well as the balance of the Shire deferred license revenues ($4.8
million at March 31, 2006) in the second quarter of 2006. Noven also manufactures and
supplies finished product for Shire.
In July 2006, Noven and Shire amended their agreement related to the development of a
transdermal amphetamine patch for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD). Under the original agreement, Noven was entitled to
payments of up to $5.0 million if certain development milestones were achieved. At the time of
the signing of the amended agreement, Noven had received $0.5 million in such milestone
payments. Under the amendment, Shire paid Noven an additional $1.0 million in August 2006,
which is included in deferred contract revenues as of September 30, 2006, and Noven will
perform certain early-stage development activities which were previously to be performed by
Shire. Upon completion of such development activities by Noven, Shire may elect to retain
exclusive rights to the product under development in exchange for payment of a total of $5.9
million.
P&G Pharmaceuticals
In April 2003, Noven established a collaboration with Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (P&G Pharmaceuticals) for the development of new prescription patches for Hypoactive
Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD). The product under development explores follow-on product
opportunities for Intrinsa, P&G Pharmaceuticals in-licensed investigational
transdermal testosterone patch designed to help restore sexual desire in menopausal women
diagnosed with HSDD. In the U.S., P&G Pharmaceuticals withdrew its NDA for
Intrinsa in December 2004 based on safety concerns expressed by an FDA Advisory
Committee and other factors. P&G Pharmaceuticals has indicated that work on
Intrinsa for the U.S. market has been placed on hold while they evaluate
alternatives for the project. If P&G Pharmaceuticals is unable to identify a practical
strategy to complete development and commercialize the product in the U.S., or if their
evaluation of alternatives significantly delays the project, the prospects for Novens
collaboration with P&G Pharmaceuticals will be adversely affected.
Other
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, Noven recognized a $1.0 million one-time
payment from a third party for a license to certain Noven patents due to Noven having no
continuing involvement nor Noven having any future economic benefit related to the license.
11. |
|
INVESTMENT IN VIVELLE VENTURES LLC (d/b/a NOVOGYNE): |
Noven shares in the earnings of Novogyne, after satisfaction of an annual preferred return
of $6.1 million to Novartis, according to an established formula. Novens share of Novogynes
earnings increases as Novogynes product sales increase, subject to a cap of 49%. Novogyne
produced sufficient income in the first quarter of 2006 and 2005 to meet Novartis annual
14
preferred return for those years and for Noven to recognize earnings from Novogyne under the
formula.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, Noven had the following
transactions with Novogyne (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
$ |
13,990 |
|
|
$ |
14,432 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
5,138 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,064 |
|
|
$ |
6,530 |
|
|
$ |
19,128 |
|
|
$ |
19,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursed expenses |
|
$ |
7,125 |
|
|
$ |
6,576 |
|
|
$ |
21,043 |
|
|
$ |
20,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Noven had amounts due from Novogyne of $7.8
million and $8.9 million, respectively, for products sold to, and marketing expenses
reimbursable by, Novogyne.
The unaudited condensed statements of operations of Novogyne for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross revenues |
|
$ |
39,204 |
|
|
$ |
37,974 |
|
|
$ |
112,138 |
|
|
$ |
100,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales allowances |
|
|
4,283 |
|
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
11,622 |
|
|
|
11,078 |
|
Sales return allowances |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales allowances and returns |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
16,198 |
|
|
|
12,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
33,728 |
|
|
|
33,775 |
|
|
|
95,940 |
|
|
|
88,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales1 |
|
|
7,529 |
|
|
|
7,940 |
|
|
|
22,212 |
|
|
|
21,347 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
9,419 |
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
|
|
28,172 |
|
|
|
25,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
16,780 |
|
|
|
16,648 |
|
|
|
45,556 |
|
|
|
41,410 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,030 |
|
|
$ |
16,849 |
|
|
$ |
46,120 |
|
|
$ |
41,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novens equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
$ |
8,234 |
|
|
$ |
8,081 |
|
|
$ |
19,323 |
|
|
$ |
17,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Novogynes costs of sales for all periods presented include the
amortization of the marketing rights Novogyne acquired for CombiPatch® of $1.5 million
and $4.6 million for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. This amortization was previously reported as a separate operating expense in
Novogynes statement of operations. |
15
The activity in the Investment in Novogyne account for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne, beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,243 |
|
Equity in earnings of Novogyne |
|
|
19,323 |
|
Cash distributions from Novogyne |
|
|
(17,644 |
) |
Non-cash distribution from Novogyne (Note 5) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in Novogyne, end of period |
|
$ |
22,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the approval of Novogynes management committee, Novogyne may, from time to
time, distribute cash to Novartis and Noven based upon a contractual formula. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, Noven received cash distributions representing return on
investment of $7.4 million and $17.6 million from Novogyne, respectively. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005, Noven received cash distributions representing return on
investment of $9.2 million and $18.1 million from Novogyne, respectively. In addition, as
discussed in Note 5, tax payments of $2.2 million and $1.5 million were made by Novogyne on
Novens behalf to the New Jersey Department of Revenue in April 2006 and 2005, respectively.
These payments were deemed distributions from Novogyne to Noven and were recorded as reductions
in Novens investment in Novogyne when deemed received.
12. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM:
In the first quarter of 2003, Novens Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase
program under which Noven may acquire up to $25.0 million of its common stock. To date, Noven
has repurchased 105,000 shares of its common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $1.3
million. No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 or
2005.
13. COST REDUCTION PROGRAM:
Over the past two years, Noven expanded its facilities and increased staffing for the
production of fentanyl, Daytrana and other developmental products. In September
2005, the FDA ceased review of Novens Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for its
fentanyl product after informing Noven that it did not expect to approve the ANDA. In the third
quarter of 2006, Noven implemented a program to reduce overhead associated with this expansion.
This program included the elimination of certain employee positions. A pre-tax one-time
termination charge of $0.6 million associated with the elimination of these positions was
included in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September
30, 2006. In addition, Noven may incur an additional $0.1 million in pre-tax outplacement
costs, which will be recognized as incurred in marketing, general and administrative expenses.
Noven does not expect any further workforce reductions in connection with this program. There
were no payments made as of September 30, 2006 related to this workforce reduction.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
HT Studies
As a result of the findings from the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) study and other
studies previously disclosed in Novens Form 10-K, the FDA has required that black box
labeling be included on all menopausal hormone therapy (HT) products marketed in the United
States to warn, among other things, that these products have been associated with increased
risks
16
for heart disease, heart attacks, strokes, and breast cancer and that they are not
approved for heart disease prevention.
Researchers continue to analyze data from both arms of the WHI study and other studies.
Other studies evaluating HT are currently underway or in the planning stages. The market for
Novens products could be adversely affected if these studies find that a transdermal estrogen
patch is less beneficial than other dosage forms, and Noven could be subject to increased
product liability risk if HT patch products are found to increase the risk of adverse health
consequences. Noven is currently named as a defendant in six product liability lawsuits
involving its HT products and Noven may have liability with respect to other actions in which
it has not, to date, been made a party. See Litigation, Claims and Assessments below for a
further discussion on related product liability lawsuits.
Since the July 2002 publication of the WHI and other study data, total United States
prescriptions have declined for substantially all HT products, including Novens products in
the aggregate. Prescriptions for CombiPatch®, Novens combination
estrogen/progestin patch, continue to decline in the post-WHI environment. Novogyne recorded
the acquisition of the marketing rights for Novens CombiPatch® product at cost and
Novogyne tests this asset for impairment on a periodic basis. Further adverse change in the
market for HT products could have a material adverse impact on the ability of Novogyne to
recover its investment in these rights, which could require Novogyne to record an impairment
loss on the CombiPatch® intangible asset. Impairment of the CombiPatch®
intangible asset would adversely affect Novogynes and Novens financial results. Management
cannot predict whether these or other studies will have additional adverse effects on Novens
liquidity and results of operations, or Novogynes ability to recover the net carrying value of
the CombiPatch® intangible asset.
Production Issues
Noven maintains in-house product stability testing for its commercialized products. This
process includes, among other things, testing samples from commercial lots under a variety of
conditions to confirm that the samples remain within required specifications for the shelf life
of the product.
In 2003, Novens product stability testing program revealed that certain lots of
CombiPatch® and Vivelle-Dot patches did not maintain required
specifications throughout the products shelf lives, resulting in product recalls of certain
lots. As a result, Noven initiated a series of special stability protocols to monitor
commercial lots in distribution as well as future production. In the first quarter of 2005, a
total of ten lots of Vivelle-Dot manufactured in 2003 were identified for recall
when one of Novens stability protocols revealed that these lots did not meet required
specification or were associated with lots that did not meet specification. The recall of
these lots in the first quarter of 2005 did not have a material impact on Novens or Novogynes
results of operations because an immaterial number of patches from these lots remained in
distribution. A joint Noven and Novartis task force is working to identify the definitive root
cause of the Vivelle-Dot stability failures. Based on testing and analysis to
date, Noven believes that the probable cause of the Vivelle-Dot stability failures
relates to certain patch backing material that Noven obtained from a raw material supplier. If
the root cause determination or additional testing indicates that the production issue affects
more product than Novens current testing and analysis suggests, additional recalls may be
required. Noven continues to manufacture and ship Vivelle-Dot to Novogyne.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis Pharma), an affiliate of
Novartis, recalled three commercial lots of Estalis® (the form of
CombiPatch® manufactured for sale outside the United States) after special stability
protocols put in place after an October 2004 CombiPatch® stability failure indicated
that certain lots did not maintain required specifications
17
throughout the products shelf-life due to the formation of crystals. The recall of these
lots did not have a material impact on Novens financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2005. During 2006, additional lots of Estalis® have been found to have
developed crystals as well. Any recall of these lots by Novartis Pharma is not expected to
have a material impact on Novens results of operations because an immaterial number of patches
from these lots remain in distribution. Noven continues to manufacture and ship
Estalis® to Novartis Pharma.
Noven continues to maintain stability testing related to the foregoing production issues.
If Novens testing indicates that additional lots of CombiPatch®,
Estalis® or Vivelle-Dot or other products do not meet specifications,
there could be additional recalls. Although Noven and Novartis work together in assessing
production issues related to these products, the decision to recall product resides with
Novartis and its affiliates as the holders of the regulatory approvals for these products and
is not within Novens control. If Novens estimate concerning product returns associated with
a recall are incorrect, or if Novens continued testing indicates that additional lots are
affected, or if Novartis should initiate additional recalls for any reason, then Novens and
Novogynes business and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
Among other things, any CombiPatch® recalls could have a material adverse impact on
the ability of Novogyne to recover its investment in its CombiPatch® marketing
rights.
The recent recalls may result in an FDA inspection of Novens facilities and procedures
and Noven cannot assure that the FDA will be satisfied with Novens operations and procedures,
which could result in more frequent and stringent inspections and monitoring. If the FDA were
to conclude that Novens manufacturing controls and procedures are not sufficient, Noven could
be required to suspend production until Noven demonstrates to the FDA that Novens controls and
procedures are sufficient.
Supply Agreement
Novens supply agreement with Novogyne for Vivelle® and Vivelle-Dot
patches expired in January 2003. Since expiration, the parties have continued to operate in
accordance with the supply agreements commercial terms. There is no assurance that the
agreements non-commercial terms would be enforceable with respect to post-expiration
occurrences. A decision to discontinue operating in accordance with the agreement under the
agreements commercial terms could have a material adverse effect on Novens financial position
and results of operations. Novogynes designation of a new supplier and approval of a new
supply agreement would require the affirmative vote of four of the five members of Novogynes
Management Committee. Accordingly, both Novartis and Noven must agree on Novogynes supplier.
Litigation, Claims and Assessments
In September 2005, Noven, Novogyne and Novartis were served with a summons and complaint
from an individual plaintiff in Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Atlantic County in
which the plaintiff claims personal injury allegedly arising from the use of HT products,
including Vivelle®. The plaintiff claims compensatory, punitive and other damages
in an unspecified amount. Noven does not expect any activity in this case in the near future,
as the court has entered an order to stay proceedings in all its pending and future HT cases
except for cases where Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and its affiliates and Pfizer, Inc. are the
defendants.
In April 2006, an individual plaintiff and her husband filed a complaint in the United
States District Court, District of Minnesota against Noven, Novogyne, Novartis, Wyeth Inc. and
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. alleging liability in connection with personal injury claims
allegedly arising from the use of HT products, including Novens CombiPatch®
product. The plaintiffs claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified amount.
18
In July 2006, four complaints were filed in the United States District Court, District of
Minnesota against Noven and other pharmaceutical companies by four separate individual
plaintiffs, each filing alone or with her husband. Three of the complaints also name Novartis
as a defendant, and of these, two name Novogyne as a defendant as well. Each complaint alleges
liability in connection with personal injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT
products, including Vivelle® in one case and CombiPatch® in two of the
cases. The plaintiffs in each case claim compensatory and other damages in an unspecified
amount. Noven has established an accrual for the expected legal fees related to the cases
referenced above, although the amount is not material.
Novartis has advised Noven that Novartis has been named as a defendant in at least 28
pending additional lawsuits that include approximately 35 plaintiffs that allege liability in
connection with personal injury claims allegedly arising from the use of HT patches distributed
and sold by Novartis and Novogyne, including Novens Vivelle-Dot,
Vivelle®, and CombiPatch® products. In addition, Novartis has been named
as a defendant in over 80 additional lawsuits in which the plaintiffs complaints do not
identify the HT products used by the plaintiffs and therefore these cases may also involve
Noven HT products. Novogyne has been named as a defendant in one lawsuit in addition to the
four lawsuits referenced above. Novartis has indicated that it will seek indemnification from
Noven and Novogyne to the extent permitted by the agreements between and among Novartis,
Novogyne and Noven. Novogyne has established an accrual for the expected legal fees and
settlements of these lawsuits for $8.5 million with an offsetting insurance recovery of $6.1
million. This accrual represents Novartis managements best estimate as of September 30, 2006.
Although Novogyne believes that recovery of the insurance receivable is probable, no assurance
can be given that Novogyne will in fact recover such amount, including as a result of any
decision by Novogynes product liability insurance carrier to contest a claim.
Noven intends to defend all of the foregoing lawsuits vigorously, but the outcome of these
product liability lawsuits cannot ultimately be predicted.
Noven is a party to other pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business, none of which Noven believes is material to its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
19
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following section addresses material aspects of our financial condition at September 30,
2006, and our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005. The contents of this section include:
|
|
|
An executive summary of our results of operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
An overview of Noven and our Novogyne joint venture; |
|
|
|
|
A review of certain items that may affect the historical or future comparability of our
results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
An analysis of our results of operations and our liquidity and capital resources; |
|
|
|
|
An outlook that includes our current financial guidance; |
|
|
|
|
A discussion of how we apply our critical accounting estimates; and |
|
|
|
|
A discussion of recently-issued accounting standards. |
This discussion should be read in conjunction with Novens financial statements for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the related notes included elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q, as well as the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations from our Form 10-K.
Executive Summary
The following Executive Summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations appearing in this Item 2 as well
as in our financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q.
The three months ended September 30, 2006 included a strong performance by our Novogyne joint
venture, the first full quarter of commercial sales of Daytrana, and significant
improvement in our overall gross margin compared to the second quarter of 2006.
Daytrana was approved by the FDA on April 6, 2006, triggering payment of a $50
million approval milestone payment from Shire. The three months ended September 30, 2006 included
the recognition of $2.0 million in license revenues associated with that milestone and $2.0 million
in Daytrana product sales to Shire. Primarily due to Daytrana product and
license revenues, our net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 increased 28% to
$15.7 million.
Due in part to our efforts undertaken in the three months ended September 30, 2006 to improve
efficiencies and reduce costs associated with Daytrana production, our overall gross
margin improved from 11% in the three months ended June 30, 2006 to 30% in the three months ended
September 30, 2006.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased $1.3
million or 34% to $2.5 million compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result
of higher 2005 expenses associated with development of Daytrana. Marketing, general
and administrative expenses increased $1.8 million or 42% to $6.0 million, primarily as a result of
the recognition of $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expenses in 2006 pursuant to accounting
guidance that we adopted in January 2006, and a $0.6 million charge in the three months ended
September 30, 2006 resulting from the elimination of certain employee positions as part of a
program intended to reduce costs and improve efficiencies within Noven.
20
We recognized $8.2 million in earnings from Novogyne for the three months ended September 30,
2006 compared to $8.1 million for the same period in the prior year. For the three months ended
September 30, 2006, we reported net income of $5.0 million ($0.20 diluted earnings per share),
compared to a net loss of $1.4 million ($0.06 diluted loss per share) reported in the 2005 quarter.
Novogynes net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 were $33.7 million,
largely unchanged from the 2005 quarter, reflecting increased sales of Vivelle-Dot,
offset by increased sales and returns allowances. Novogynes gross margin for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 increased slightly to 78% due to increased sales of
Vivelle-Dot. Novogynes selling, general and administrative expenses for the third
quarter of 2006 increased 3% to $9.4 million compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily reflecting increased promotional spending in support of Vivelle-Dot.
Novogynes net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was $17.0 million compared to
$16.8 million for the same period in 2005.
Total prescriptions for Vivelle-Dot increased 4% in the third quarter of 2006
compared to the third quarter of 2005, and total prescriptions for Novogynes products, taken as a
whole, increased 1% period-over-period. By comparison, the overall U.S. HT market declined 4% for
the third quarter of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005. Total prescriptions for
Daytrana (launched in June 2006) increased 17% in September 2006 (the most recent month
for which data are available) compared to August 2006, while prescriptions for ADHD stimulant
therapies as a class were largely unchanged for the same period.
Overview of Noven and Our Novogyne Joint Venture
We develop and manufacture advanced transdermal patches and presently derive the majority of
our revenues from sales of transdermal patches for use in menopausal HT. In the United States, our
HT products are marketed and sold by Novogyne Pharmaceuticals, the joint venture that we formed
with Novartis in 1998. Our business, financial position and results of operations currently depend
on Novogyne and its marketing of our three principal HT products Vivelle®,
Vivelle-Dot
and CombiPatch® in the United States. A discussion of
Novogynes results of operations and their impact on our results can be found under the caption
Results of OperationsEquity in Earnings of Novogyne.
In all countries other than the United States, Canada and Japan, we have licensed the
marketing rights to these products to Novartis Pharma, which is an affiliate of Novartis. In most
of these markets, Vivelle® is marketed under the brand name Menorest,
Vivelle-Dot is marketed under the brand name Estradot® and
CombiPatch® is marketed under the brand name Estalis®.
We hold a 49% equity interest in Novogyne, and Novartis holds the remaining 51% equity
interest. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, we manufacture and supply
Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch® to Novogyne, perform
marketing, sales and promotional activities, and receive royalties from Novogyne based on
Novogynes sales of the estrogen therapy (ET) products. Novartis distributes
Vivelle®, Vivelle-Dot and CombiPatch® and provides certain other
services to Novogyne, including financial and accounting functions.
Novartis is entitled to an annual $6.1 million preferred return from Novogyne, which has the
effect of reducing our share of Novogynes income in the first quarter of each year. After the
annual preferred return to Novartis, our share of Novogynes income increases as product sales
increase, subject to a maximum of 49%. Our share of Novogynes income was $19.3 million and $17.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The income we
recognize from Novogyne is a non-cash item. Any cash we receive from Novogyne is in the form of
cash distributions declared by Novogynes Management Committee. Accordingly, the amount of cash
that we receive from Novogyne in any period may not be the same as the amount of income we
21
recognize from Novogyne for that period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, we received $17.6 million and $18.1 million, respectively, in distributions from Novogyne,
which, not including the $50 million received from Shire, accounted for a substantial portion of
our net cash flows generated by operating activities for these periods. We expect that a
significant portion of our earnings and cash flow for the next several years will be generated
through our interest in Novogyne, as well as any additional milestone payments we may receive from
Shire. Any failure by Novogyne to remain profitable or to continue to make distributions would
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The market for HT products, including our transdermal HT products, has contracted since the
July 2002 publication of the WHI study that found adverse health risks associated with HT products.
Comparing the second quarter of 2002 (the quarter immediately preceding the publication of initial
data from the WHI study) to the third quarter of 2006, total prescriptions dispensed in the HT
market in the United States decreased by 53.8%. For the same period, aggregate prescriptions for
Novens United States HT products decreased 6.5%. The estrogen segment of the HT market in the
United States declined 49.4%, while our Vivelle® line of products increased 7.6%.
Vivelle-Dot, which represented approximately 87.0% of our total United States
prescriptions in the third quarter of 2006, increased 36.6% from the second quarter of 2002 to the
third quarter of 2006. We believe Vivelle-Dot patch prescriptions have benefited from
both increased demand and patient conversions from the original Vivelle® product.
United States prescriptions for our CombiPatch® product (which represented 9.7% of
our total United States prescriptions in the third quarter of 2006) declined 57.9% from the second
quarter of 2002 to the third quarter of 2006, while prescriptions for the total United States
market for fixed combination hormone therapy products decreased 71.8%. Further decreases in net
sales of our CombiPatch® product (whether as a result of the WHI studies, the production
issues discussed below, higher rates of sales returns or otherwise) could require Novogyne (which
holds the CombiPatch® marketing rights) to record an impairment loss related to this
intangible asset ($27.8 million at September 30, 2006), which would adversely affect the results of
operations of both Noven and Novogyne.
Certain Items that May Affect Historical or Future Comparability
For a discussion of certain items that may affect the historical or future comparability of
our results of operations and financial condition, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Form 10-K as well as the
following updated and/or supplemented items. Such disclosure is not intended to address every item
that may affect the historical or future comparability of our results of operations or financial
condition and such disclosure should be read in conjunction with the discussion and analysis of our
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources and outlook appearing elsewhere in this Item
2.
Cost Reduction Program
Over the past two years, we expanded our facilities and increased staffing for the production
of fentanyl, Daytrana and other developmental products. In September 2005, the FDA
ceased review of our ANDA for our fentanyl product after informing us that it did not expect to
approve the ANDA. In the third quarter of 2006, we implemented a program to reduce overhead
associated with this expansion. This program included the elimination of certain employee
positions, which we believe will result in annual pre-tax savings of up to $1.8 million. A pre-tax
one-time termination charge of $0.6 million associated with the elimination of these positions was
included in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2006. In addition, we may incur an additional $0.1 million in pre-tax outplacement costs, which
will be recognized as incurred in marketing, general and administrative expenses. We do not expect
any further workforce reductions in connection with this program.
22
DEA Quota
The DEA controls access to controlled substances, including methylphenidate, the active
ingredient in Daytrana. Manufacturers of products containing controlled substances must
annually apply to the DEA for procurement quota in order to obtain these substances for
manufacturing. In 2006, we received an initial grant of methylphenidate quota and have submitted
supplemental applications for additional quota in order to fulfill the 2006 product orders received
from Shire. The DEA, which grants quota based primarily on historical product sales and
prescription data, has not, to date, granted our requests for additional 2006 quota. While Noven
and Shire continue to work with the DEA to obtain additional methylphenidate quota for the
remainder of 2006, we cannot assure that we will be successful in convincing the DEA that
additional quota is necessary to meet patient demand. Because we have not received additional
quota for 2006, we expect to complete the year with approximately $8.0 million in full-year
Daytrana product sales to Shire and approximately $2.0 million in
Daytrana product backorders that we would expect to fulfill following receipt of our
expected 2007 quota supply in the first quarter of 2007. As discussed under Outlook below, the reduction in Daytrana revenues will
negatively affect our gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2006 but, to the extent that these
backorders are filled as expected in the first quarter of 2007, the related revenues should benefit
our gross margin in 2007. If the DEA declines to grant us additional 2006 quota, it is possible
(subject to a number of factors including ongoing demand for the product) that product supply for
certain dosage strengths may be interrupted and, as a result, Daytrana sales as well as
our results of operations could be adversely affected.
P&G Pharmaceuticals
In April 2003, we established a collaboration with P&G Pharmaceuticals for the development of
new prescription patches for HSDD. The product under development explores follow-on product
opportunities for Intrinsa, P&G Pharmaceuticals in-licensed investigational
transdermal testosterone patch designed to help restore sexual desire in menopausal women diagnosed
with HSDD. In the U.S., P&G Pharmaceuticals withdrew its New Drug Application for
Intrinsa in December 2004 based on safety concerns expressed by an FDA Advisory
Committee and other factors. P&G Pharmaceuticals has indicated that work on Intrinsa for the U.S.
market has been placed on hold while they evaluate alternatives for the project. If P&G
Pharmaceuticals is unable to identify a practical strategy to complete development and
commercialize the product in the U.S., or if their evaluation of alternatives significantly delays
the project, the prospects for our collaboration with P&G Pharmaceuticals will be adversely
affected.
Stock-Based Compensation
Currently, our outstanding stock-based compensation consists of: (i) stock options; (ii)
SSARs; and (iii) for our non-employee directors, restricted stock awards. Prior to January 1,
2006, all awards granted to employees under the 1999 Plan were stock options. In 2006, Noven began
granting SSARs to employees and restricted stock to non-employee directors in lieu of stock
options, and from time to time we may consider or grant other forms of stock-based compensation.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS 123(R). We
elected the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative
purposes. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation
cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as
expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting
period. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a
number of complex and subjective variables. See Critical Accounting Estimates.
Total stock-based compensation recognized in our statements of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 was $2.4 million, of which $1.8 million was recognized in
23
marketing, general and administrative and $0.3 million was recognized in each of research and
development and cost of products sold, respectively. There were no stock-based compensation costs
capitalized as part of inventory or fixed assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
At September 30, 2006, the unamortized compensation expense that we expect to record in future
periods related to currently outstanding unvested stock options, SSARs and restricted stock, as
determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R), is approximately $5.4 million before the effect of
income taxes, of which $0.8 million, $2.5 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million is expected to be
incurred in the remainder of 2006 and in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. We will also incur
additional expense in future years related to new equity awards that may be granted in the future
that cannot yet be quantified.
In order to eliminate some of the future compensation expense that we would otherwise have
recognized in our statements of operations under SFAS 123(R), during 2005 we accelerated the
vesting of certain stock options under the 1999 Plan. As a result of this action, options to
purchase approximately 1.1 million shares of our common stock became immediately exercisable,
including options held by our executive officers to purchase approximately 455,000 shares. We
recorded an immaterial charge to compensation expense during the fourth quarter of 2005 due to the
acceleration of a nominal amount of in-the-money options. As a result of the acceleration, during
2005, we eliminated approximately $10.1 million of compensation expense, net of applicable income
taxes, from our future statements of operations and this expense is included in the pro forma
footnote disclosure for the year ended December 31, 2005.
24
Results of Operations
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005
Revenues
Total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are summarized
as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Product revenues Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
5,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
13,990 |
|
|
$ |
14,432 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Royalties |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
5,138 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
19,128 |
|
|
|
19,049 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues third parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
15,402 |
|
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Royalties |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
15,648 |
|
|
|
11,888 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues |
|
|
12,825 |
|
|
|
10,447 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
34,776 |
|
|
|
30,937 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract and license revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
(94 |
%) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
(38 |
%) |
License |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
177 |
% |
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
151 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
8,671 |
|
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
15,708 |
|
|
$ |
12,240 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
$ |
43,447 |
|
|
$ |
35,747 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
As described in more detail below, the 28% increase in net revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily attributable to the launch
of Daytrana and an increase in license revenue associated with that product. In
addition, aggregate sales to Novogyne increased due to timing of shipments. These increases were
offset by an aggregate decline in international product sales, which we believe was due to the
timing of orders.
As described in more detail below, the 22% increase in net revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily attributable to the product
launch of Daytrana, an increase in license revenue associated with that product and an
increase in royalties. These increases were offset by an aggregate decline in product sales to Novogyne
and international product sales, which we believe was due primarily to the timing of orders.
Product Revenues Novogyne
Product revenues Novogyne consists of our sales of
Vivelle-Dot/Estradot®, CombiPatch® and Vivelle® to
Novogyne at a fixed price for resale by Novogyne primarily in the United States as well as the
royalties we receive as a result of Novogynes sales of Vivelle-Dot and
Vivelle®.
The $0.5 million increase in product revenues from Novogyne for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $0.8
25
million increase in unit sales of Vivelle-Dot, partially offset by a $0.2 million and
$0.1 million decline in unit sales of Estradot® and Vivelle®, respectively.
The increase in Vivelle-Dot and the decrease in Estradot® and
Vivelle® are primarily related to the timing of trade product orders from Novogyne.
The $0.1 million increase in product revenues from Novogyne for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $0.3
million increase in unit sales of Vivelle-Dot and a $0.5 million increase in royalties,
partially offset by a $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million decline in unit sales of
CombiPatch®, Estradot® and Vivelle®, respectively. The increase
in Vivelle-Dot was primarily attributable to a $0.8 million increase in product
samples, partially offset by a $0.4 million decline in unit sales of trade product. The increase
in product samples related to the timing of shipments to Novogyne. The decline in trade product
sales was attributable to the timing of orders placed by Novogyne and not a decline in market
demand. The increase in royalties was attributable to higher sales by Novogyne for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. The decline in CombiPatch® was primarily related to declining
prescription trends which we believe are attributable to the ongoing effects of WHI and other
studies on combination therapy products as well as the impact of a competitive product. The
decline in unit sales of Estradot® were attributable to the timing of trade product
orders. The decline in unit sales of Vivelle® to Novogyne primarily reflected the
planned discontinuation of the production of this mature product by the end of 2006.
Product
Revenues Third Parties
Product
revenues third parties consists of sales of Estradot®,
Estalis® and Menorest to Novartis Pharma at a price based on a percentage of Novartis
Pharmas net selling price (subject to certain minima) for resale primarily outside the United
States and Japan, together with royalties generated from Novartis Pharmas sales of
Vivelle® and Estradot® in Canada. Beginning in the second quarter of 2006,
product revenues third parties also includes sales of Daytrana to Shire for
commercial resale in the United States.
The $1.8 million increase in product revenues from third parties for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $2.0
million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million increase in unit sales of Daytrana ,
Estradot® and Estalis®, respectively, partially offset by a $0.5 million
decline related to pricing. The increase in Daytrana was due to the initial product
launch that occurred during the period while the increase in Estradot® and Estalis®
was attributable to the timing of orders. The decline related to pricing was due to a
decline in price reconciliation payments from Novartis Pharma.
The $3.8 million increase in product revenues from third parties for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to a $5.7
million increase in unit sales of Daytrana partially offset by a decline in unit sales
of $0.7 million and $0.4 million of Estalis® and Menorest, respectively. In addition,
the nine month period included a decline of $0.9 million related to pricing as we recognized less
of a price reconciliation payment in the current nine month period for all products sold to
Novartis Pharma. The increase in Daytrana and the decline related to pricing are
attributable to the same factors as discussed above for the three-month comparable periods. The
decline in Estalis® was attributable to the timing of orders while the decline in
Menorest was attributable to the continued transition from Menorest to Estradot®.
Contract and License Revenues
Contract revenues consist of the recognition of payments received as work is performed on
research and development projects. The payments received may take the form of non-refundable up-
front payments, payments received upon the completion of certain phases of work and success
26
milestone payments. License revenues consist of the recognition of non-refundable up-front,
milestone and similar payments under license agreements.
Contract revenues declined $0.7 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006 as compared to the same periods in the prior year due to a decline in contract work performed.
License revenues increased $1.8 million and $4.5 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively, due primarily to the recognition in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 of $3.9 million in deferred license revenues related to Daytrana and
the recognition of a $1.0 million one-time non-refundable payment from a third party for a license
to certain of our patents.
Gross Margin
The following section presents Novens gross margin on (i) total product revenues, (ii)
product revenues derived from sales to Novogyne, which for accounting purposes is considered to be
a related party; and (iii) product revenues derived from sales to third parties (i.e., excluding
sales to Novogyne).
The allocation of overhead costs impacts our determination of gross margins, including
our gross margins for product revenues derived from sales to Novogyne compared to gross margins for
product revenues derived from sales to third parties. Overhead costs consist of salaries and
benefits, supplies and tools, equipment costs, depreciation and insurance costs and represent a
substantial portion of our production costs. The allocation of overhead between and among our
various products requires us to make significant estimates that involve subjective and often
complex judgments. Using different estimates would likely result in materially different gross
margins for product revenues derived from sales to Novogyne compared to gross margins for product
revenues derived from sales to third parties.
27
Gross Margin Total
Novens overall gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
is summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
12,825 |
|
|
$ |
10,447 |
|
|
$ |
34,776 |
|
|
$ |
30,937 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
9,041 |
|
|
|
15,416 |
|
|
|
27,068 |
|
|
|
26,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (product revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
(4,969 |
) |
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
4,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
-48 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-launch inventory write-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit excluding pre-launch
inventory write-off of fentanyl |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin excluding pre-launch
inventory write-off of fentanyl |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our overall gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 was adversely
affected by a $9.5 million charge incurred in the third quarter of 2005 related to the write-off of
fentanyl pre-launch inventories. In light of the significance of this charge, we have provided
gross margin information that excludes its effect. We believe such non-GAAP information is useful
to investors in order to meaningfully evaluate our ongoing, underlying business and to compare our
financial results for the periods presented in 2006 and 2005. For the same reasons, management
uses these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate Novens ongoing, underlying business. These
measures should not be considered alternatives to measures computed in accordance with GAAP, nor
should they be considered indicators of our overall financial performance.
Excluding the effect of our write-off of pre-launch fentanyl inventory in the third quarter of
2005, the decline in our overall gross margin for the three and nine months periods ended September
30, 2006 compared to the same periods in the prior year was primarily due to costs and
inefficiencies associated with the start-up of commercial production of Daytrana, which
was launched in June 2006. The cost reduction program commenced in the three months ended
September 30, 2006 to reduce costs and improve efficiencies and yields contributed to significant
improvement in overall gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the
overall gross margin that we recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Our expectations
for overall gross margin in future periods are addressed under Outlook below.
Increased personnel and other resources dedicated to quality control in our HT operations also
contributed to a decline in gross margin for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2006 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The cost of these resources increased
approximately $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2005.
28
Over the past two years, we expanded our facilities and increased staffing for the production
of fentanyl, Daytrana and other developmental products. In September 2005, the FDA
ceased review of our ANDA for our fentanyl product after informing us that it did not expect to
approve the ANDA. In the third quarter of 2006, we implemented a program intended to reduce
overhead associated with this expansion. Our results of operations and gross margins for future
periods are expected to continue to be adversely affected by our prior expansion activities and
related continuing overhead expenses unless and until we are able to improve the utilization of
these resources through the commercialization of additional products. No assurance can be given
that we will be able to improve the utilization of these resources.
As described in our Form 10-K, Novens cost of products sold may be affected in a given period
by changes in deferred profit on Novens sale of product to Novogyne. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, however, changes in deferred profit on Novens sale of product to
Novogyne did not materially affect our overall gross margin or the gross margin from our sales to
Novogyne and therefore such information has not been included in this Form 10-Q.
Gross
Margin Sales to Novogyne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Novogyne: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
7,064 |
|
|
$ |
6,530 |
|
|
$ |
19,128 |
|
|
$ |
19,049 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (product revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
8,824 |
|
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin on product sales to Novogyne for the three months ended September 30, 2006
increased, primarily due to a shift in the product mix as there was an increase in product sales of
Vivelle-Dot and a decline in sales of Estradot® and Vivelle® and
overall samples sold to Novogyne. Vivelle-Dot has a higher gross margin than
Estradot® and Vivelle® and product sales have a higher gross
margin than sample sales. These increases are partially offset by increased overhead costs associated with the
facilities expansion and increased staffing discussed above.
Gross margin on product sales to Novogyne for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
declined due to the product mix, as there was a higher percentage
of sample sales to Novogyne (which have a lower margin than sales of trade product). Sample
product sales to Novogyne were 15% of total product sales to Novogyne, not including royalties, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 8% for the comparable period in
2005. In addition, the facilities expansion and increased staffing discussed above contributed to
the decline in gross margin in this period.
29
Gross Margin Sales to third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Margin Third Parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
5,761 |
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
15,648 |
|
|
$ |
11,888 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
5,339 |
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
16,764 |
|
|
|
17,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) (product
revenues
less cost of products sold) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
(7,978 |
) |
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
(5,419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit (loss)
as a
percentage of product revenues) |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
(204 |
%) |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
(46 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-launch inventory write-off of fentanyl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) excluding
pre-launch
inventory write-off of fentanyl |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
4,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin excluding pre-launch
inventory write-off of fentanyl |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the charge taken in the third quarter of 2005 from the write-off of
pre-launch fentanyl inventory, the decline in gross margin related to third parties for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006, primarily related to on-going inefficiencies associated
with manufacturing Daytrana, the facilities expansion and increased staffing discussed above, and to a lesser extent smaller production orders in our third
party HT business.
For the three month period ended September 30, 2006, Daytrana product revenues
were $2.0 million and cost of products sold related to Daytrana was $2.7 million. This
represents a significant improvement from the second quarter of 2006. The increase in gross margin was attributable to the implementation of a
program in the three months ended September 30, 2006 intended to improve Daytrana
production efficiencies and reduce manufacturing costs. Only a portion of the expected benefits of
this program was recognized in the three month period ended September 30, 2006. The
quarter ended September 30, 2006 also included $2.0 million in non-cash license revenues related to
Daytrana that are not included in the calculation of gross margin.
The active methylphenidate ingredient is not included in our Daytrana product
revenues or in our cost of products sold. Shire is responsible for supplying us with the AMI used
in the production of Daytrana and Shire retains title to the AMI. We maintain AMI on
hand at our manufacturing facility as consignment inventory and bear certain risks of manufacturing
loss related to the AMI. These risks include the contractual obligation to reimburse Shire for the
cost of AMI if we do not meet certain minimum contractual yields of the finished product. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, we reimbursed Shire approximately $0.1 million
and $0.5 million, respectively, for excess AMI used in production, which amounts are included in
costs of products sold for such periods.
Our expectations for overall gross margin in future periods are addressed under Outlook
below.
30
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are
summarized as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
Research and development |
|
$ |
2,527 |
|
|
$ |
3,826 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
|
$ |
8,899 |
|
|
$ |
9,752 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
12,481 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include costs associated with, among other things, product
formulation, pre-clinical testing, clinical studies, regulatory and medical affairs, production for
clinical and regulatory purposes, production related development engineering for developmental
products, and the personnel associated with each of these functions.
The decline in research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2006
was primarily attributable to a $1.3 million decline in production of clinical and regulatory
supplies related to Daytrana and other products and a $0.3 million decline in clinical
trial costs. This decline was partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in consulting costs, a
$0.1 million in stock-based compensation and a $0.1 million increase in personnel costs.
The decline in research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
compared to the same period of 2005 was primarily attributable to the absence of development
engineering expenses related to our fentanyl transdermal system in the 2006 period, compared to
$2.3 million of such expenses in the 2005 period, as well as a $0.3 million decline in pre-clinical
costs, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in development engineering and production of
clinical and regulatory supplies related to Daytrana, $0.4 million in personnel costs,
$0.3 million in stock-based compensation expense, a $0.2 million increase in the purchase of
testing supplies and a $0.1 million increase in clinical costs related to other products under
development.
Marketing, General and Administrative
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to a $0.7 million increase in salary and related
benefits, $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expenses that were not required to be recognized
in the 2005 quarter, and the $0.6 million charge associated with the elimination of employee positions discussed above. These increases were partially
offset by a $0.2 million decline in professional fees due to the timing of services performed.
The increase in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to $1.8 million in stock-based compensation expenses
that were not required to be recognized in the 2005 period, a $1.3 million increase in salary and
related benefits, the $0.6 million charge associated with the
elimination of employee positions discussed above, and a $0.1 million increase in costs
associated with compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the latter of which was due to the
timing of services performed. In addition, 2005 benefited from a $0.2 million reduction in product
recall related expenses. These increases were offset by a $0.2 million reduction in
professional fees primarily in the areas of legal and human resources.
31
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Income
Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased $0.7 million
and $1.3 million, respectively, due to an increase in the average cash balance, which was primarily
attributable to the $50 million milestone payment received from Shire in April 2006 in connection
with the approval of our Daytrana product by the FDA. In addition to higher average
cash balances, we invested a higher portion of our cash in short-term investments that yielded
higher interest income.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 31% for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in our effective tax rate is primarily related to
higher taxable income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the comparable
period in the prior year due to the fentanyl write-offs in the prior year, as well as certain
credits and reductions for reserves for pending Internal Revenue Service audits that occurred in
the prior period that did not recur in the current period. These increases are partially offset by
higher non-taxable interest as a percentage of taxable income. The provision for income taxes is
based on the Federal statutory and state income tax rates. Net deferred income tax assets are
measured using the average graduated tax rate for the estimated amount of annual taxable income in
the years that the liability is expected to be settled or the asset recovered. The effect of
adjusting the expected tax rate related to the net deferred income tax assets is included in the
provision for income taxes. As of September 30, 2006, we had a net deferred tax asset of $12.4
million. Realization of this deferred tax asset depends upon the generation of sufficient future
taxable income. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that
the deferred income tax asset will be realized based upon estimated future taxable income.
Equity in Earnings of Novogyne
We share in the earnings of Novogyne according to an established formula after satisfaction of
an annual preferred return of $6.1 million to Novartis. Our share of Novogynes earnings (a
non-cash item) increases as Novogynes product sales increase, subject to a cap of 49%. Novogyne
produced sufficient income in the first quarters of 2006 and 2005 to meet Novartis annual
preferred return for those periods and for us to recognize earnings from Novogyne under the
formula. We report our share of Novogynes earnings as Equity in earnings of Novogyne in our
unaudited statements of operations.
32
In April 2006, Noven received a $50 million milestone payment from Shire as a result of the
approval of Daytrana, and Noven may also earn up to three additional $25 million
milestone payments upon Shires achievement of $25 million, $50 million and $75 million in annual
net sales of Daytrana, respectively. Shire commercially launched the product in June
2006. The majority of the income taxes related to the $50 million milestone is expected to be paid in late 2007 or early 2008.
Capital expenditures were $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. We
expect to fund any capital expenditures from our existing cash balances. As a general matter, we
believe that we have sufficient liquidity available to meet our operating needs and anticipated
short-term capital requirements.
For our long-term operating needs, we intend to utilize funds derived from the above sources,
as well as funds generated through sales of products under development or products that we may
license or acquire from others. We expect that such funds will be comprised of payments received
pursuant to future development and licensing arrangements, as well as possible direct sales of our
own products. We expect that our cash requirements will generally continue to increase, primarily
to fund plant and equipment purchases to expand production capacity for new products. If our
products under development with collaborative partners are successful, these expenditures, which
may include the cost of building an additional manufacturing plant, are expected to be significant.
We cannot assure that we will successfully complete the development of such products, that we
will obtain regulatory approval for any such products, that any approved product may be produced in
commercial quantities, at reasonable costs, and be successfully marketed, or that we will
successfully negotiate future licensing or product acquisition arrangements. Because much of the
cost associated with product development and expansion of manufacturing facilities is incurred
prior to product launch, if we are unsuccessful in out-licensing, or if we are unable to launch
additional commercially-viable products that we develop or that we license or acquire from others,
we will have incurred the up-front costs associated with product development or acquisition without
the benefit of the liquidity generated by sales of those products, which could adversely affect our
long-term liquidity needs. Factors that could impact our ability to develop or acquire and launch
additional commercially-viable products are discussed in Part I Item 1A of our Form 10-K and in
Part II Item 1A of any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q we have filed with the SEC since the filing
of the Form 10-K, as well as in other reports filed from time to time with the SEC.
From time to time we may explore the acquisition of one or more technologies, products or
businesses that we believe may be complementary to our existing business. We may draw upon our
cash and short-term investments to fund such potential strategic acquisitions. We may also
consider issuing equity securities to fund potential acquisitions. To the extent our existing cash
and short-term investments are insufficient to fund any large-scale acquisitions we may be required
to seek debt financing or to issue equity or debt securities. If a material acquisition is
completed, our results of operations and financial condition could change materially in future
periods. If we finance all or any portion of an acquisition through debt financing or debt
securities we could be required to devote a portion of our cash to the prepayment of such debt and
could be subject to financial or operational covenants that could limit or hinder our ability to
conduct our business.
In addition, although we have not repurchased any of our common stock since 2003, it is
possible that a portion of our cash and short-term investments could be used to repurchase Noven
common stock under our previously-announced stock repurchase program. Stock repurchases, if any,
may be made in the open market, including pursuant to a trading program under Rule 10b5-1
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
satisfactory alternative financing, we may be required to delay or reduce our proposed
expenditures, including expenditures for research and development and plant and equipment, in order
to meet our future cash requirements.
There have been no material changes outside of the ordinary course of our business since
December 31, 2005 to our aggregate contractual obligations previously disclosed in our Form 10-K.
For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Estimates, which
is included in our Form 10-K, as updated and supplemented by the following:
License revenues consist of up-front, milestone and similar payments under license agreements
and are not recognized until earned under the terms of the applicable agreements. In most cases,
license revenues are deferred and recognized over the estimated product life cycle, which is
managements best estimate of the earning period. Estimates of product life cycles are inherently
uncertain as a result of regulatory, competitive or medical developments. We estimate product life
cycles based on our assessment of various factors, including the expected launch date of the
licensed product, the strength of the intellectual property protection of the product, the
contractual terms, and various other competitive, developmental and regulatory issues. Any change
to the actual or estimated product life could require us to change the recognition period.
Managements best estimate of the end of the product life cycle for Daytrana extends
through the first quarter of 2013, which results in the annual recognition of approximately $8.0
million in license revenues for the $50 million approval milestone payment we received from Shire
in April 2006. If our estimate of the Daytrana product life cycle should change, we
will be required to change the license revenue recognition period, which may materially change the
license revenues that we recognize in any given period. For example, Daytrana license
revenues would be $5.0 million and $3.8 million on an annual basis had we determined that the
product life cycle ended in the first quarter of 2016 and 2019, respectively, for the $50 million
approval milestone.
We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
options and SSARs. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date
of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock
price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee equity award exercise
behaviors, risk-free interest rate, expected forfeiture rates and expected dividends.
option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are
expected to vest. All share-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If factors
change and we employ different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in
future periods or if we decide to use a different valuation model, the future periods may differ
significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our
operating income, net income and net income per share. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable, characteristics not present in our option grants. Existing valuation
models, including the Black-Scholes and lattice binomial models, may not provide reliable measures
of the fair values of our stock-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our
estimates of the fair values of our stock-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear
little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration, early termination
or forfeiture of those stock-based payments in the future. Stock options or SSARs may expire
worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally
estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be
realized from these instruments that are significantly higher than the fair values originally
estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. There currently is no
market-based mechanism or other practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the
estimates stemming from these valuation models, nor is there a means to compare and adjust the
estimates to actual values.
The guidance in SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107 is relatively new. The application of these principles
may be subject to further interpretation and refinement over time. There are significant
differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility that we will adopt different
valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and
materially affect the fair value estimate of stock-based payments. It may also result in a lack of
comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48 to clarify the accounting for uncertainties related to
income taxes that are recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS
109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. The
first step is recognition, which requires an enterprise to determine whether it is more likely than
not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the
position. The second step is measurement, which requires a company to recognize a tax position
that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold at the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective
as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2006. We
are currently assessing FIN 48 and are unable to estimate the impact it will have on our results of
operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB 108, which added Section N to Topic 1, Financial
Statements, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. Section N provides guidance on the
consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements when quantifying current year financial
statement misstatements for the purpose of materiality assessment. The SEC concluded in SAB 108
that a registrants materiality evaluation of an identified unadjusted error should quantify the
impact of correcting all misstatements, including both the carryover and reversing effects of prior
year misstatements, on the current year financial statements. If either the carryover or reversing
effects of prior year misstatements is material, the misstatements should be corrected in the
current year. If correcting an error in the current year for prior year misstatements causes the
current year to be materially misstated, the prior year financial statements should be corrected,
even though such revision previously was and continues to be immaterial to the prior year financial
statements.