Edgar Filing: ALBEMARLE CORP

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Transition Period from to .

Commission File Number 1-12658

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


VIRGINIA		54-1692118
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)


451 FLORIDA STREET
BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA		70801
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code - (225) 388-8011

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company ¨

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of August 1, 2009: 91,548,935

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION

INDEX – FORM 10-Q


		Page Number(s)
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Income – Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	6

	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7-13

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14-29

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	29

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	30

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	31

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	31

Item 6.	Exhibits	32

SIGNATURES		33

EXHIBITS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net sales	$	445,299		$	620,750		$	931,890		$	1,288,927
Cost of goods sold		335,481			457,769			731,566			958,535

Gross profit		109,818			162,981			200,324			330,392
Selling, general and administrative expenses		51,481			67,598			96,915			131,117
Research and development expenses		14,953			17,593			31,098			34,393
Port de Bouc charges		12,393			—			12,393			—
Restructuring charges		—			—			—			3,278

Operating profit		30,991			77,790			59,918			161,604
Interest and financing expenses		(6,088	)		(8,441	)		(12,362	)		(18,657	)
Other income, net		1,276			1,938			145			4,784

Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments		26,179			71,287			47,701			147,731
Income tax benefit (expense)		7,749			(12,902	)		7,224			(29,528	)

Income before equity in net income of unconsolidated investments		33,928			58,385			54,925			118,203
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)		6,204			8,666			12,153			15,694

Net income		40,132			67,051			67,078			133,897
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(1,639	)		(5,396	)		(3,186	)		(8,981	)

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation		38,493			61,655			63,892			124,916

Basic earnings per share	$	0.42		$	0.67		$	0.70		$	1.36

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.42		$	0.67		$	0.70		$	1.34

Cash dividends declared per share of common stock	$	0.125		$	0.12		$	0.25		$	0.24
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic		91,474			91,489			91,427			92,072
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted		92,011			92,564			91,904			93,234

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	172,476		$	253,303
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts (2009 - $2,107; 2008 - $1,899)		273,386			280,601
Other accounts receivable		29,338			47,157
Inventories		385,916			538,857
Other current assets		51,557			59,005

Total current assets		912,673			1,178,923

Property, plant and equipment, at cost		2,379,310			2,322,996
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		1,348,181			1,310,648

Net property, plant and equipment		1,031,129			1,012,348
Investments		139,000			121,951
Other assets		134,106			113,717
Goodwill		288,207			278,767
Other intangibles, net of amortization		155,793			167,011

Total assets	$	2,660,908		$	2,872,717

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	126,378		$	224,333
Accrued expenses		120,169			170,512
Current portion of long-term debt		26,771			26,202
Dividends payable		10,595			9,675
Income taxes payable		7,979			7,645

Total current liabilities		291,892			438,367

Long-term debt		820,556			906,062
Postretirement benefits		47,905			47,803
Pension benefits		149,250			146,381
Other noncurrent liabilities		120,194			142,783
Deferred income taxes		77,977			74,838
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, issued and outstanding – 91,539 in 2009 and 90,980 in 2008		915			910
Additional paid-in capital		3,924			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(89,691	)		(100,642	)
Retained earnings		1,196,402			1,165,503

Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity		1,111,550			1,065,771

Noncontrolling interests		41,584			50,712

Total equity		1,153,134			1,116,483

Total liabilities and equity	$	2,660,908		$	2,872,717

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	$	253,303		$	130,551

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		67,078			133,897
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		50,404			54,042
Port de Bouc charges		12,393			—
Restructuring charges		—			3,278
Stock-based compensation		(4,279	)		10,106
Excess tax benefits realized from stock-based compensation arrangements		(1,120	)		(7,688	)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments		(12,153	)		(15,694	)
Working capital changes		12,979			(78,900	)
Dividends received from unconsolidated investments and nonmarketable securities		5,952			5,308
Pension and postretirement expense		4,693			1,385
Pension and postretirement contributions		(7,341	)		(5,876	)
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities		(1,454	)		(78	)
Net change in noncurrent income tax payables and receivables		(18,431	)		1,220
Net change in noncurrent environmental liabilities		(3,544	)		(1,293	)
Withholding taxes paid on stock-based compensation award distributions		(4,798	)		(10,157	)
Deferred income taxes		(6,422	)		11,367
Other, net		8,358			(6,437	)

Net cash provided from operating activities		102,315			94,480

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(60,459	)		(40,237	)
Cash payments related to the Thann facility divestiture		—			(2,556	)
Cash payments related to the Port de Bouc facility divestiture		(11,248	)		—
Cash payments related to acquisitions		(1,793	)		(19,965	)
Collection of note receivable from sale of land		—			6,000
Investments in marketable securities		(469	)		(2,522	)
Investments in other corporate investments		(40	)		(49	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(74,009	)		(59,329	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt		(117,762	)		(50,266	)
Proceeds from borrowings		32,748			214,612
Dividends paid to shareholders		(21,948	)		(20,476	)
Purchases of common stock		—			(151,137	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		2,207			3,931
Excess tax benefits realized from stock-based compensation arrangements		1,120			7,688
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		(8,911	)		(7,337	)
Other		—			(107	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(112,546	)		(3,092	)

Net effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents		3,413			5,872

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(80,827	)		37,931

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	172,476		$	168,482

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net income	$	40,132		$	67,051		$	67,078		$	133,897
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—			—			1			—
Amortization of realized loss on treasury lock agreements		35			35			72			70
Changes in net loss and prior service cost		(3,040	)		(235	)		(6,230	)		(698	)
Foreign currency translation		70,195			3,151			17,108			68,676

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		67,190			2,951			10,951			68,048

Comprehensive income		107,322			70,002			78,029			201,945

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(1,639	)		(5,396	)		(3,186	)		(8,981	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	105,683		$	64,606		$	74,843		$	192,964

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Albemarle Corporation and our wholly owned, majority owned and controlled subsidiaries (collectively, “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “the Company”) contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation, in all material respects, of our condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and our condensed consolidated results of operations and comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and our condensed consolidated cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on February 27, 2009. The December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet data herein was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the United States, or the U.S. The results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto to conform to the current presentation. We have evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009, which is the date we issued the financial statements.

2. On January 1, 2009, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This standard changed the accounting for and reporting of minority interests (now referred to as noncontrolling interests). Noncontrolling interests are now classified as equity in our consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 also changed the consolidated statement of income presentation format by requiring net income to include the net income for both the parent and the noncontrolling interests, with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of income. The calculation of earnings per share continues to be based on net income amounts attributable to the parent. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 160, prior period amounts related to noncontrolling interests have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

3. The three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 include charges amounting to $12.4 million ($8.2 million after income taxes, or $0.09 per share) that relate to the costs of a final contract settlement arising from our 2008 divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility. Future cash payments associated with the settlement should be complete by the end of 2009.

The six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes charges amounting to $3.3 million ($2.1 million after income taxes, or $0.02 per share) that relate to severance costs in conjunction with personnel reductions at our former Richmond, Virginia headquarters and our Singapore sales office.

4. Our consolidated statements of income include the following foreign exchange transaction (losses) gains for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(In thousands)
Cost of goods sold	$	(1,100	)	$	(1,448	)	$	(2,067	)	$	2,175
Other income, net		954			428			(720	)		1,758

Total foreign exchange transaction (losses) gains	$	(146	)	$	(1,020	)	$	(2,787	)	$	3,933

5. Our effective tax rate fluctuates based on, among other factors, where income is earned and the level of income relative to available tax credits. The significant differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate on pretax income and the effective income tax rate for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:


	% of Income Before Income Taxes
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit	0.2		0.3		0.2		0.4
Impact of foreign operations, net	(21.4	)	(15.4	)	(20.8	)	(14.2	)
Increase in valuation allowance	0.3		0.2		0.3		0.1
Depletion	(1.4	)	(1.7	)	(1.5	)	(1.4	)
Effect of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.8	)	(0.6	)	(0.6	)	(0.6	)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements	0.6		0.9		0.6		1.0
Other items, net	2.1		(0.6	)	1.2		(0.3	)

Effective income tax rate excluding non-recurring items	14.6	%	18.1	%	14.4	%	20.0	%
Non-recurring items	(44.2	)	—		(29.5	)	—

Effective income tax rate	(29.6	)%	18.1	%	(15.1	)%	20.0	%

Included in the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 are various non-recurring items totaling a net $13.4 million benefit and a net $15.9 million benefit, respectively. The three-month period ended June 30, 2009 includes $9.2 million in one time net benefits due mainly to decreases in unrecognized tax benefit liabilities and deferred tax assets related to an issue settled in the current U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, examination of years 2005 through 2007, and a net $4.2 million benefit related to the charges arising out of our divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility. The six-month period ended June 30, 2009 also included $3.7 million of one time benefits due mainly from unrecognized tax benefits, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in a valuation allowance for losses at our Brazilian entity.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, we decreased our unrecognized tax benefit liabilities (which are included in “Other noncurrent liabilities”) to $55.2 million from $77.5 million at December 31, 2008. This decrease of $22.3 million resulted from a $12.6 million reduction related to an issue settled in the current U.S. IRS examination of 2005 through 2007 as well as a $9.7 million reduction mainly for prior year tax positions on transfer pricing (which resulted in reducing the related assets for corresponding benefits included in “Other assets” from $39.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $32.3 million at June 30, 2009).

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for years preceding 2005. The IRS has completed a review of our income tax returns through year 2004. During 2008, we received examination notifications from the IRS on tax years 2005 through 2007. We anticipate tax resolutions related to these years in either 2009 or 2010.

With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., we are no longer subject to income tax audits for years preceding 2002.

While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.

Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits is uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $16 million as a result of settlements with taxing authorities and closure of tax statutes.

6. On January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” or FSP EITF 03-6-1. FSP EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends, such as certain of our restricted stock

awards, are participating securities and therefore shall be included in the earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two class method described in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires all prior-period earnings per share data to be adjusted retrospectively, and as a result, all prior period earnings per share data presented herein have been adjusted to conform to these provisions. Basic earnings per share decreased $0.01 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 as a result of an increase in our basic weighted-average common shares outstanding of approximately 307,000 shares. Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding increased by approximately 197,000 shares for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding increased by approximately 306,000 and 206,000 shares, respectively, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 did not impact our reported basic or diluted earnings per share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009. Our basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding increased by approximately 327,000 and 120,000 shares, respectively, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding increased by approximately 335,000 and 160,000 shares, respectively.

Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are calculated as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Basic earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	38,493	$	61,655	$	63,892	$	124,916

Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share		91,474		91,489		91,427		92,072

Basic earnings per share	$	0.42	$	0.67	$	0.70	$	1.36

Diluted earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	38,493	$	61,655	$	63,892	$	124,916

Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share		91,474		91,489		91,427		92,072
Incremental shares under stock compensation plans		537		1,075		477		1,162

Total shares		92,011		92,564		91,904		93,234

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.42	$	0.67	$	0.70	$	1.34

7. Cash dividends declared for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 totaled 12.5 cents per share, and included a dividend of 12.5 cents declared on May 13, 2009 and paid on July 1, 2009. Cash dividends declared for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 totaled 25.0 cents per share. Cash dividends declared for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 totaled 12.0 cents per share, and included a dividend of 12.0 cents declared on May 29, 2008 and paid July 1, 2008. Cash dividends declared for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 totaled 24.0 cents per share.

8. The following table provides a breakdown of inventories at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(In thousands)
Finished goods	$	277,708	$	395,919
Raw materials		60,430		95,617
Stores, supplies and other		47,778		47,321

Total inventories	$	385,916	$	538,857

9. Long-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consists of the following:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(In thousands)
Variable-rate domestic bank loans	$	424,420	$	522,835
Senior notes		324,813		324,796
Fixed rate foreign borrowings		46,638		47,640
Variable-rate foreign bank loans		39,435		23,320
Capital lease obligation		11,386		12,975
Miscellaneous		635		698

Total		847,327		932,264
Less amounts due within one year		26,771		26,202

Total long-term debt	$	820,556	$	906,062

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows: 2009—$20.4 million; 2010—$12.2 million; 2011—$9.0 million; 2012—$7.4 million; 2013—$459.3 million and 2014 through 2017—$339.0 million.

10. We have the following recorded environmental liabilities primarily included in “Other noncurrent liabilities” at June 30, 2009 (in thousands):


Beginning balance at December 31, 2008	$	18,970
Changes in estimates		(2,302	)
Payments		(913	)
Foreign exchange		(6	)

Ending balance at June 30, 2009	$	15,749

The amounts recorded represent our future remediation and other anticipated environmental liabilities. Although it is difficult to quantify the potential financial impact of compliance with environmental protection laws, management estimates (based on the latest available information) that there is a reasonable possibility that future environmental remediation costs associated with our past operations, in excess of amounts already recorded, could be up to approximately $18 million before income taxes.

We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation matters in excess of the amounts recorded should occur over a period of time and should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a consolidated annual basis, although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.

On July 3, 2006, we received a Notice of Violation, or NOV, from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, or EPA, regarding the implementation of the Pharmaceutical Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards at our plant in Orangeburg, SC. The alleged violations include (i) the applicability of the specific regulations to certain intermediates manufactured at the plant, (ii) failure to comply with certain reporting requirements, (iii) improper evaluation and testing to properly implement the regulations and (iv) the sufficiency of the leak detection and repair program at the plant. We are currently engaged in discussions with the EPA seeking to resolve these allegations, but no assurances can be given that we will be able to reach a resolution that is acceptable to both parties. Any settlement or finding adverse to us could result in the payment by us of fines, penalties, capital expenditures, or some combination thereof. At this time, it is not possible to predict with any certainty the outcome of our discussions with the EPA or the financial impact which may result therefrom. However, we do not expect any financial impact to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

11. Segment income represents operating profit (adjusted for significant non-recurring items) and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments and is reduced by net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost, foreign exchange transaction gains and losses and allocations for certain corporate costs.

Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following table. Corporate & other includes corporate-related items not allocated to the reportable segments.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(In thousands)
Net sales:
Polymer Additives	$	172,720		$	260,508		$	295,920		$	505,098
Catalysts		168,603			208,386			411,190			484,483
Fine Chemicals		103,976			151,856			224,780			299,346

Total net sales	$	445,299		$	620,750		$	931,890		$	1,288,927

Segment operating profit:
Polymer Additives	$	15,882		$	27,363		$	4,319		$	57,632
Catalysts		31,708			35,520			61,469			81,676
Fine Chemicals		5,760			27,673			16,043			51,153

Subtotal	$	53,350		$	90,556		$	81,831		$	190,461

Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated investments:
Polymer Additives	$	222		$	1,205		$	270		$	2,677
Catalysts		6,009			7,488			11,937			13,054
Fine Chemicals		—			—			—			—
Corporate & other		(27	)		(27	)		(54	)		(37	)

Total equity in net income of unconsolidated investments	$	6,204		$	8,666		$	12,153		$	15,694

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Polymer Additives	$	(1,440	)	$	(2,116	)	$	(1,655	)	$	(4,105	)
Catalysts		—			—			—			—
Fine Chemicals		(605	)		(3,223	)		(2,158	)		(5,158	)
Corporate & other		406			(57	)		627			282

Total net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	(1,639	)	$	(5,396	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,981	)

Segment income:
Polymer Additives	$	14,664		$	26,452		$	2,934		$	56,204
Catalysts		37,717			43,008			73,406			94,730
Fine Chemicals		5,155			24,450			13,885			45,995

Total segment income		57,536			93,910			90,225			196,929
Corporate & other ⁽¹⁾		(9,587	)		(12,850	)		(8,947	)		(25,334	)
Port de Bouc charges		(12,393	)		—			(12,393	)		—
Restructuring charges		—			—			—			(3,278	)
Interest and financing expenses		(6,088	)		(8,441	)		(12,362	)		(18,657	)
Other income, net		1,276			1,938			145			4,784
Income tax benefit (expense)		7,749			(12,902	)		7,224			(29,528	)

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	38,493		$	61,655		$	63,892		$	124,916

⁽¹⁾

Corporate and other charges for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 includes $7.8 million in adjustments associated with the reversal of certain long-term employee benefit accruals. This adjustment is primarily included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our consolidated statements of income.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

We have contracts with certain of our customers, which serve as guarantees on product delivery and performance according to customer specifications that can cover both shipments on an individual basis as well as blanket coverage of multiple shipments under customer supply contracts, that are executed through certain financial institutions. The financial coverage provided by these guarantees is typically based on a percentage of net sales value.

In connection with the remediation of a local landfill site as required by the German environmental authorities, we have pledged certain of our land and housing facilities at our Bergheim, Germany plant site with a recorded value of $6.3 million.

In addition, we are involved from time to time in legal proceedings of types regarded as common in our businesses, particularly administrative or judicial proceedings seeking remediation under environmental laws, such as Superfund, products liability and premises liability litigation. We maintain a financial accrual for these proceedings that includes defense costs and potential damages, as estimated by our legal counsel. We also maintain insurance to mitigate certain of these risks. See Note 10 above.

13. The following information is provided for domestic and foreign pension and postretirement benefit plans:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(In thousands)
Net Periodic Pension Benefit Cost (Credit):
Service cost	$	2,305		$	3,435		$	5,147		$	6,302
Interest cost		8,258			7,941			16,318			15,875
Expected return of assets		(10,540	)		(10,430	)		(21,166	)		(20,992	)
Plan curtailment		—			(172	)		—			(172	)
Net transition asset		(2	)		(3	)		(5	)		(5	)
Prior service benefit		(246	)		(250	)		(493	)		(506	)
Net loss		3,206			2,057			6,312			3,914

Total net periodic pension benefit cost	$	2,981		$	2,578		$	6,113		$	4,416

We have made $4.2 and $5.7 million in contributions to our qualified and nonqualified pension plans during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(In thousands)
Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (Credit):
Service cost	$	126		$	102		$	219		$	223
Interest cost		937			792			1,884			1,655
Expected return of assets		(142	)		(143	)		(286	)		(286	)
Prior service benefit		(1,892	)		(2,400	)		(3,785	)		(4,799	)
Net loss		287			62			548			176

Total net periodic postretirement benefit credit	$	(684	)	$	(1,587	)	$	(1,420	)	$	(3,031	)

We paid approximately $0.6 and $1.6 million in premiums to the U.S. postretirement benefit plan during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

14. We have the following recorded workforce reduction liabilities included in “Accrued expenses” at June 30, 2009 (in thousands):


Beginning balance at December 31, 2008	$	20,276
Payments		(16,630	)
Foreign exchange and other		(277	)

Ending balance at June 30, 2009	$	3,369

During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, we made payments as a result of restructuring charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. The majority of the payments under this restructuring plan are expected to occur in 2009.

15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In assessing the fair value of financial instruments, we use methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and other risk factors existing at the time of assessment. Fair value information for our financial instruments is as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts and Other Receivables and Accounts Payable—The carrying value approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.

Long-Term Debt—The carrying value of long-term debt reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with the exceptions of the senior notes which we sold on January 20, 2005 and foreign currency denominated debt at Jordan Bromine Company, approximates fair value as substantially all of the long-term debt bears interest based on prevailing variable market rates currently available in the countries in which we have borrowings.


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Recorded Amount		Fair value		Recorded Amount		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Current portion of long-term debt	$	26,771	$	26,690	$	26,202	$	26,377
Long-term debt	$	820,556	$	781,379	$	906,062	$	856,520

Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts—The fair values of our forward currency exchange contracts are estimated based on current settlement values. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of the forward contracts represented minimal net positions on our consolidated balance sheets.

16. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets,” or FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1. FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 applies to employers subject to SFAS No. 132(R) and is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures regarding benefit plan assets including (a) the investment allocation decision process, (b) the fair value of each major category of plan assets and (c) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets. We are currently evaluating the additional disclosures required upon adoption of FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” or SFAS No. 167. SFAS No. 167 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The provisions of SFAS No. 167 significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009, rendering it effective for us beginning in 2010. We do not expect the provisions of SFAS No. 167 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” or SFAS No. 168, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification^™, or Codification, which supersedes all existing accounting standard documents and will become the single source of authoritative GAAP (other than guidance issued by the SEC) for all non-governmental entities. The Codification was implemented on July 1, 2009 and will be effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP and it is not expected to result in a change in our accounting practice. We expect to conform our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto to the new Codification for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations since December 31, 2008. A discussion of consolidated financial condition and sources of additional capital is included under a separate heading “Financial Condition and Liquidity” on page 26.

Forward-looking Statements

Some of the information presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the documents incorporated by reference, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, which are in turn based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our current knowledge of our business and operations. We have used words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will” and variations of such words and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance, therefore, that our actual results will not differ materially from the results and expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, without limitation:

•

deterioration in economic and business conditions;

•

future financial and operating performance of our major customers and industries served by us;

•

the timing of orders received from customers;

•

the gain or loss of significant customers;

•

competition from other manufacturers;

•

changes in the demand for our products;

•

limitations or prohibitions on the manufacture and sale of our products;

•

availability of raw materials;

•

changes in the cost of raw materials and energy, and our inability to pass through such increases;

•

performance of acquired companies;

•

changes in our markets in general;

•

fluctuations in foreign currencies;

•

changes in laws and increased government regulation of our operations or our products;

•

the occurrence of claims or litigation;

•

the occurrence of natural disasters;

•

the inability to maintain current levels of product or premises liability insurance or the denial of such coverage;

•

political unrest affecting the global economy, including adverse effects from terrorism or hostilities;

•

changes in accounting standards;

•

the inability to achieve results from our global cost reduction initiatives as well as our ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs;

•

changes in interest rates, to the extent such rates (1) affect our ability to raise capital or increase our cost of funds, (2) have an impact on the overall performance of our pension fund investments and (3) increase our pension expense and funding obligations;

•

volatility and substantial uncertainties in the debt and equity markets; and

•

the other factors detailed from time to time in the reports we file with the SEC.

We assume no obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by securities and other applicable laws. The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We are a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals. Our products and services enhance the value of our customers’ end-products by improving performance, providing essential product attributes, lowering cost and simplifying processing. We sell a highly diversified mix of products to a wide range of customers, including petroleum refiners, utilities providers, and manufacturers of consumer electronics, building and construction materials, automotive parts, packaging, pharmachemicals and agrichemicals. We believe that our commercial and geographic diversity, technical expertise, flexible, low-cost global manufacturing base, and experienced management team enable us to maintain leading market positions in those areas of the specialty chemicals industry in which we operate.

Second Quarter 2009

During the second quarter of 2009:

•

quarterly net sales of $445.3 million and earnings (net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation) of $38.5 million, or $0.42 per share

•

pre-tax charge of $12.4 million ($8.2 million after income taxes, or $0.09 per share) related to the costs of a final contract settlement arising from the 2008 divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility

•

one time benefit of $9.2 million, or $0.10 per share, due mainly from a tax issue settlement for the years 2005 through 2007 with the United States Internal Revenue Service

•

sequential improvement from first quarter 2009 in Polymer Additives segment income

•

record Catalysts segment income margin of 22%

•

solid progress on cost reduction initiatives

•

net repayments of long-term debt of over $70 million

Outlook

While it is difficult to see signs of a significant end-market recovery, we are experiencing positive trends in several market segments. Our initiatives to improve productivity and to reduce operating costs along with the potential for a slowly improving business climate and some further raw material and energy price declines should result in improving performance in the second half of 2009 with a stronger balance sheet at year end versus the beginning of this year.

Polymer Additives: While early signs of end-market recovery are evident, we expect continued demand softness in the consumer electronics, automotive and construction sectors to impact volumes and profitability of our Polymer Additives segment. Although we are taking steps to restructure our operations and reduce costs, we expect challenges in this business to continue until historical demand levels return and our production rates improve. In the longer term, the increasing standard of living around the globe should drive higher demand for electrical and electronic equipment and new construction, and the potential for increasingly stringent fire-safety regulations and global climate initiatives should increase the need for insulation materials.

We are continuing to increase our presence in China as we build a foundation for expanding our business in Asia. Expansion of our now wholly owned antioxidants facility in Shanghai is expected to come on-line in 2010.

New product development momentum continues in our Polymer Additives segment. The trend in some electronic components toward halogen-free flame retardants, while challenging our legacy products, also creates numerous development opportunities with our diverse customer base. We plan to begin commercializing sales of a new halogen-free product in one of our key-growth markets and have several others in various stages of development. We also plan to commercialize a new polyurea curative, which offers greater cure speed flexibility and therefore we believe will expand and increase performance and use.

Catalysts: We expect revenue growth in our Catalysts segment to be driven by global demand for petroleum products, generally deteriorating quality of crude oil feedstock and implementation of more stringent fuel quality requirements as a part of clean air initiatives. While we continue to monitor developments in the global economy, we expect our Catalysts segment profit growth in 2009 to come primarily from new product introductions, new markets that we penetrate, FCC pricing improvements, and the continued growth in our polyolefin catalysts business.

With continuing global demand for oil and consumer fuel and tightening fuel quality regulations, we believe refiners in the longer term will process more sour crudes, which should require additional HPC catalysts to remove the metals and impurities, further driving demand for these catalysts. We must also continue to successfully pass through metals costs and ensure optimal inventory levels in periods of declining metals prices.

Our focus in FCC catalysts is on improving margins to support the value these products bring to the market. We believe there remains room for further margin improvement, and that in order to be successful we must continue to deliver high-performing, superior quality products to meet the growing demands of refiners processing increasingly heavy crudes. We have seen incremental margin increases, although we continue to face raw material cost pressures related to imported rare earths and transportation costs. We believe, however, that our price increases should offset increasing raw material costs, but there is no guarantee that will occur.

We are focused on new product development in Catalysts and have introduced high-throughput experimentation to more rapidly test and develop new technologies. Our marketing and research groups are tightly aligned so we can continue to bring innovative technologies to the market. We will continue to explore new opportunities for our catalysts in the alternative fuels business, which includes biodiesel, Canadian oil sands, gas to liquids (GTL), and coal to liquids (CTL) markets. These opportunities become increasingly viable with sustained price increases.

Fine Chemicals: In our performance chemicals sector, the continuing economic challenges have impacted our bromine franchise in oil completion fluids and bromine consumption. While we expect to increase production in the second half of the year, the rates are still below normal and therefore we expect continued negative impacts from unabsorbed fixed costs. Our fine chemistry services business continues to benefit from the continued rapid pace of innovation and the introduction of new products, coupled with the movement by pharmaceutical companies to outsource certain research, product development and manufacturing functions. Our long-term strategic areas of focus in our Fine Chemicals segment are to maximize our bromine franchise value in the performance chemicals sector and to continue the growth of our fine chemistry services business.

We are focused on profitably growing our globally competitive bromine and derivatives production network to serve all major bromine consuming products and markets. As we supply bromine feed stocks to our Polymer Additives segment, our profitability is generally impacted as market conditions change in that sector. In fine chemistry services, our new products pipeline continues to be robust, allowing us to develop preferred outsourcing positions serving leading chemical and pharmaceutical companies in diverse industries. We remain confident in continuing to generate growth in profitable niche products leveraged from this service business.

Corporate and Other: We are continuing our focus on reducing working capital and maximizing cash generation. In addition, we will continue to focus on tax efficiency; however, incremental income is more likely to be earned in locales with higher incremental rates. We believe our global effective tax rate will approximate 14% this year, but will vary based on the locales in which incremental income is actually earned. We increased our quarterly dividend by 4% in 2009 to $0.125 per share. Under our existing share repurchase program, we have the ability to periodically repurchase shares in 2009. In addition, we remain committed to evaluating the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions that complement our business footprint.

Additional information regarding our products, markets and financial performance is provided at our web site, www.albemarle.com. Our web site is not a part of this document nor is it incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations

The following data and discussion provides an analysis of certain significant factors affecting our results of operations during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Second Quarter 2009 Compared with Second Quarter 2008

Selected Financial Data (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Percentage Change
	2009			2008			2009 vs. 2008
	(In millions, except percentages and per share amounts)
NET SALES	$	445.3		$	620.8		(28	)%
Cost of goods sold		335.5			457.8		(27	)%

GROSS PROFIT		109.8			163.0		(33	)%
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN		24.7	%		26.3	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		51.5			67.6		(24	)%
Research and development expenses		14.9			17.6		(15	)%
Port de Bouc charges		12.4			—		*

OPERATING PROFIT		31.0			77.8		(60	)%
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN		7.0	%		12.5	%
Interest and financing expenses		(6.1	)		(8.4	)	(27	)%
Other income, net		1.3			1.9		*

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS		26.2			71.3		(63	)%
Income tax benefit (expense)		7.7			(12.9	)	*
Effective tax rate		(29.6	)%		18.1	%

INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS		33.9			58.4		(42	)%
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)		6.2			8.7		(29	)%

NET INCOME		40.1			67.1		(40	)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(1.6	)		(5.4	)	(70	)%

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ALBEMARLE CORPORATION	$	38.5		$	61.7		(38	)%

PERCENTAGE OF NET SALES		8.6	%		9.9	%

Basic earnings per share	$	0.42		$	0.67		(37	)%

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.42		$	0.67		(37	)%

*	Calculation is not meaningful.

Net Sales

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net sales of $445.3 million, a 28% decrease compared to net sales of $620.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due primarily to a decline in volumes in all segments. Volumes had a negative impact on sales of 22%, while price and product mix and foreign currency changes caused a combined 6% decrease compared to the same period last year.

Polymer Additives net sales decreased $87.8 million, or 34%, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, with volumes contributing 28% of the decrease, foreign currency impacts of 4% and price and product mix impacts of 2%. Catalysts net sales decreased $39.8 million, or 19%, compared to the same period last year due mainly to a decrease in volumes contributing 10%, price and mix impacts of 6% and foreign currency impacts of 3%. Fine Chemicals net sales decreased $47.9 million, or 32%, compared to the same period last year primarily due to volumes contributing 28% of the decrease, foreign currency impacts of 3% and price and product mix impacts of 1%. For a detailed discussion of revenues and segment income before taxes for each segment see “Segment Information Overview” below.

Gross Profit

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, our gross profit decreased $53.2 million, or 33%, to $109.8 million from the corresponding 2008 period due mainly to volume declines, unfavorable production rate impacts on cost in our bromine franchise and high cost metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, we continued to operate our manufacturing facilities at reduced production rates to control inventory levels, contributing to unfavorable profit effects from lower fixed cost absorption. Overall, these factors contributed to our decline in gross profit margin for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 to 24.7% from 26.3% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, our selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses decreased $16.1 million, or 24%, from the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in personnel costs and discretionary spending as a result of our recent cost saving actions. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 11.6% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 10.9% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Research and Development Expenses

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, our research and development, or R&D, expenses decreased $2.7 million, or 15%, from the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in personnel costs. As a percentage of net sales, R&D expenses were 3.3% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 2.8% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Port de Bouc Charges

The three-month period ended June 30, 2009 includes charges amounting to $12.4 million ($8.2 million after income taxes) that related to the costs of a final contract settlement arising from the 2008 divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility.

Interest and Financing Expenses

Interest and financing expenses for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased $2.3 million to $6.1 million from the corresponding 2008 period due to lower average interest rates.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased $0.6 million from the corresponding 2008 period due primarily to a decrease in interest income as a result of lower average interest rates.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

Our effective tax rate fluctuates based on, among other factors, where income is earned and the level of income relative to available tax credits. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, our effective income tax rate was (29.6)% as compared to 18.1% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. The effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 was impacted by various non-recurring items totaling a net benefit of $13.4 million. Included in this amount is a net $9.2 million benefit due mainly to decreases in unrecognized tax benefit liabilities and deferred tax assets related to an issue settled in the current United States, or U.S., Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, examination of years 2005 through 2007, and a net $4.2 million benefit related to the charges arising out of our divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility. Based on our current level and location of income, we anticipate that our effective tax rate for 2009 will approximate 14%.

The significant differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate on pretax income and the effective income tax rate for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:


	% of Income Before Income Taxes
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit	0.2		0.3
Impact of foreign operations, net	(21.4	)	(15.4	)
Increase in valuation allowance	0.3		0.2
Depletion	(1.4	)	(1.7	)
Effect of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.8	)	(0.6	)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements	0.6		0.9
Other items, net	2.1		(0.6	)

Effective income tax rate excluding non-recurring items	14.6	%	18.1	%
Non-recurring items	(44.2	)	—

Effective income tax rate	(29.6	)%	18.1	%

Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Investments

Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was $6.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $8.7 million in the same period last year. This decrease of $2.5 million is due primarily to lower equity earnings from our Catalysts segment joint venture, Nippon Ketjen Company Limited, as a result of unfavorable material input costs as well lower equity earnings from our Magnifin joint venture in our Polymer Additives segment due to decreased volumes in the automotive sector. These earnings declines are partially offset by increased equity earnings from our Catalysts segment joint venture, Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores S.A, or FCC SA, as a result of improved pricing.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $1.6 million compared to $5.4 million in the same period last year. This decrease of $3.8 million is due primarily to lower earnings of Jordan Bromine Company Limited as a result of a decline in bromine volumes.

Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation decreased to $38.5 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, from $61.7 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to volume declines and unfavorable fixed cost absorption across our businesses, high cost metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts, and Port de Bouc related charges of $12.4 million. These impacts were partially offset by SG&A reductions as a result of our recent cost saving actions and various non-recurring tax items.

Segment Information Overview. We have identified three reportable segments as required by SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Our Polymer Additives segment is comprised of the flame retardants and stabilizers and curatives product areas. Our Catalysts segment is comprised of the refinery catalysts and polyolefin catalysts product areas. Our Fine Chemicals segment is comprised of the performance chemicals and fine chemistry services and intermediates product areas. Segment income represents operating profit (adjusted for significant non-recurring items) and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments and is reduced by net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost, foreign exchange transaction gains and losses and allocations for certain corporate costs.


	Three Months Ended June 30,										Percentage Change
	2009			% of net sales		2008			% of net sales		2009 vs 2008
	(In millions, except percentages)
Net sales:
Polymer Additives	$	172.7		38.8	%	$	260.5		41.9	%	(34	)%
Catalysts		168.6		37.9	%		208.4		33.6	%	(19	)%
Fine Chemicals		104.0		23.3	%		151.9		24.5	%	(32	)%

Total net sales	$	445.3		100.0	%	$	620.8		100.0	%	(28	)%

Segment operating profit:
Polymer Additives	$	15.9		9.2	%	$	27.4		10.5	%	(42	)%
Catalysts		31.7		18.8	%		35.5		17.0	%	(11	)%
Fine Chemicals		5.7		5.5	%		27.7		18.2	%	(79	)%

Subtotal	$	53.3				$	90.6				(41	)%

Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments:
Polymer Additives	$	0.2				$	1.2				(83	)%
Catalysts		6.0					7.5				(20	)%
Fine Chemicals		—					—				—	%
Corporate & other		—					—				—	%

Total equity in net income of unconsolidated investments	$	6.2				$	8.7				(29	)%

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Polymer Additives	$	(1.4	)			$	(2.1	)			(33	)%
Catalysts		—					—				—	%
Fine Chemicals		(0.6	)				(3.3	)			(82	)%
Corporate & other		0.4					—				*

Total net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	(1.6	)			$	(5.4	)			(70	)%

Segment income:
Polymer Additives	$	14.7		8.5	%	$	26.5		10.2	%	(45	)%
Catalysts		37.7		22.4	%		43.0		20.6	%	(12	)%
Fine Chemicals		5.1		4.9	%		24.4		16.1	%	(79	)%

Total segment income		57.5					93.9				(39	)%
Corporate & other		(9.5	)				(12.8	)			(26	)%
Port de Bouc charges		(12.4	)				—				*
Interest and financing expenses		(6.1	)				(8.4	)			(27	)%
Other income, net		1.3					1.9				*
Income tax benefit (expense)		7.7					(12.9	)			*

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	38.5				$	61.7				(38	)%

*	Calculation is not meaningful.

Polymer Additives

Polymer Additives segment net sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $172.7 million, down $87.8 million, or 34%, versus the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decline is a result of a decrease in volumes primarily in our flame retardants portfolio as a result of the continued softness in the consumer electronics, automotive and construction sectors. Net sales also declined in our stabilizers and curatives product lines primarily due to reduced volumes in antioxidants. Segment income was down 45%, or $11.8 million, to $14.7 million due mainly to lower sales volumes as well as lower production volumes which contributed to unfavorable fixed cost absorption for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008.

Catalysts

Catalysts segment net sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $168.6 million, a decrease of $39.8 million, or 19%, versus the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due primarily to unfavorable metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts revenues, foreign currency exchange rates and lower FCC refinery catalysts volumes, partially offset by improved pricing in FCC refinery catalysts and polyolefin catalysts. Segment income decreased 12%, or $5.3 million, to $37.7 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, due mainly to unfavorable metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts, which were partially offset by strong profits from our polyolefin catalysts business.

Fine Chemicals

Fine Chemicals segment net sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $104.0 million, a decrease of $47.9 million, or 32%, versus the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. Segment income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $5.1 million, down $19.3 million, or 79%, from the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. These declines were due mainly to reduced sales and production volumes in the segment as well as product mix in fine chemistry services.

Corporate and other

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, our Corporate and other expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 26%, to $9.5 million from the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in certain employee benefit expenses.

Six-Months 2009 Compared with Six-Months 2008

Selected Financial Data (Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Percentage Change
	2009			2008			2009 vs. 2008
	(In millions, except percentages and per share amounts)
NET SALES	$	931.9		$	1,288.9		(28	)%
Cost of goods sold		731.6			958.5		(24	)%

GROSS PROFIT		200.3			330.4		(39	)%
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN		21.5	%		25.6	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		96.9			131.1		(26	)%
Research and development expenses		31.1			34.4		(10	)%
Port de Bouc charges		12.4			—		*
Restructuring charges		—			3.3		*

OPERATING PROFIT		59.9			161.6		(63	)%
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN		6.4	%		12.5	%
Interest and financing expenses		(12.4	)		(18.7	)	(34	)%
Other income, net		0.2			4.8		*

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS		47.7			147.7		(68	)%
Income tax benefit (expense)		7.2			(29.5	)	*
Effective tax rate		(15.1	)%		20.0	%

INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS		54.9			118.2		(54	)%
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)		12.2			15.7		(22	)%

NET INCOME		67.1			133.9		(50	)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(3.2	)		(9.0	)	(64	)%

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ALBEMARLE CORPORATION	$	63.9		$	124.9		(49	)%

PERCENTAGE OF NET SALES		6.9	%		9.7	%

Basic earnings per share	$	0.70		$	1.36		(49	)%

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.70		$	1.34		(48	)%

*	Calculation is not meaningful.

Net Sales

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net sales of $931.9 million, a 28% decrease compared to net sales of $1,288.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due primarily to a decline in volumes in all segments. Volumes had a negative impact on sales of 25% and foreign currency changes caused a 3% decrease compared to the same period last year.

Polymer Additives net sales decreased $209.2 million, or 41%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, as a result of volumes contributing 38% of the decrease and foreign currency impacts of 3%. Catalysts net sales decreased $73.3 million, or 15%, compared to the same period last year due mainly to a decrease in volumes contributing 11%, foreign currency impacts of 3% and price and product mix impacts of 1%. Fine Chemicals net sales decreased $74.5 million, or 25%, compared to the same period last year as a result of a decrease in volumes. For a detailed discussion of revenues and segment income before taxes for each segment see “Segment Information Overview” below.

Gross Profit

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our gross profit decreased $130.1 million, or 39%, to $200.3 million from the corresponding 2008 period, due mainly to volume declines, unfavorable production rate impacts on cost in our

bromine franchise and high cost metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, we operated our manufacturing facilities at reduced rates to control inventory levels, contributing to unfavorable profit effects from lower fixed cost absorption. These factors contributed to our decline in gross profit margin for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 to 21.5% from 25.6% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our SG&A expenses decreased $34.2 million, or 26%, from the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to first quarter 2009 adjustments of $7.0 million associated with the reversal of certain long-term employee benefit accruals and a reduction in personnel costs and discretionary spending resulting from our recent cost saving actions. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 10.4% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 10.2% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Research and Development Expenses

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our R&D expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 10%, from the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. As a percentage of net sales, R&D expenses were 3.3% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 2.7% for the corresponding period in 2008.

Port de Bouc Charges

The six-month period ended June 30, 2009 includes charges amounting to $12.4 million ($8.2 million after income taxes) that related to the costs of a final contract settlement arising from the 2008 divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility.

Restructuring Charges

The six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes charges amounting to $3.3 million ($2.1 million after income taxes) that related to severance costs in conjunction with personnel reductions at our former Richmond, Virginia headquarters and our Singapore sales office.

Interest and Financing Expenses

Interest and financing expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased $6.3 million to $12.4 million from the corresponding 2008 period primarily due to lower average interest rates.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased $4.6 million from the corresponding 2008 period due primarily to an increase in foreign currency exchange losses and a decrease in interest income as a result of lower average interest rates.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

Our effective tax rate fluctuates based on, among other factors, where income is earned and the level of income relative to available tax credits. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our effective income tax rate was (15.1)% as compared to 20.0% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. The effective income tax rate for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was impacted by various non-recurring items totaling a net benefit of $15.9 million. Included in this amount is a net $9.2 million benefit due mainly to decreases in unrecognized tax benefit liabilities and deferred tax assets related to an issue settled in the current U.S. IRS examination of years 2005 through 2007 and a net $4.2 million benefit related to the charges arising out of our divestiture of the Port de Bouc, France facility. Also included is a $3.7 million benefit due mainly from unrecognized tax benefits, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in a valuation allowance for losses at our Brazilian entity. Based on our current level and location of income, we anticipate that our effective tax rate for 2009 will approximate 14%.

The significant differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate on pretax income and the effective income tax rate for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:


	% of Income Before Income Taxes
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit	0.2		0.4
Impact of foreign operations, net	(20.8	)	(14.2	)
Increase in valuation allowance	0.3		0.1
Depletion	(1.5	)	(1.4	)
Effect of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.6	)	(0.6	)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements	0.6		1.0
Other items, net	1.2		(0.3	)

Effective income tax rate excluding non-recurring items	14.4	%	20.0	%
Non-recurring items	(29.5	)	—

Effective income tax rate	(15.1	)%	20.0	%

Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Investments

Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was $12.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $15.7 million in the same period last year. This decrease of $3.5 million is due primarily to lower equity earnings from our Magnifin joint venture in our Polymer Additives segment due to decreased volumes in the automotive sector as well as lower overall equity earnings from our various Catalysts segment joint ventures.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $3.2 million compared to $9.0 million in the same period last year. This decrease of $5.8 million is due primarily to lower earnings of Jordan Bromine Company Limited as a result of a decline in bromine volumes as well as lower earnings of Stannica LLC as a result of a decline in volume due to demand softness in the construction sector.

Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation decreased to $63.9 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 from $124.9 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to volume declines and unfavorable fixed cost absorption across our businesses, high cost metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts, and Port de Bouc related charges of $12.4 million. These impacts were partially offset by SG&A reductions as a result of our recent cost saving actions, a decline in interest and financing expenses, and various non-recurring tax items.

Segment Information Overview


	Six Months Ended June 30,										Percentage Change
	2009			% of net sales		2008			% of net sales		2009 vs 2008
	(In millions, except percentages)
Net sales:
Polymer Additives	$	295.9		31.8	%	$	505.1		39.2	%	(41	)%
Catalysts		411.2		44.1	%		484.5		37.6	%	(15	)%
Fine Chemicals		224.8		24.1	%		299.3		23.2	%	(25	)%

Total net sales	$	931.9		100.0	%	$	1,288.9		100.0	%	(28	)%

Segment operating profit:
Polymer Additives	$	4.3		1.5	%	$	57.6		11.4	%	(93	)%
Catalysts		61.5		15.0	%		81.7		16.9	%	(25	)%
Fine Chemicals		16.0		7.1	%		51.2		17.1	%	(69	)%

Subtotal	$	81.8				$	190.5				(57	)%

Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments:
Polymer Additives	$	0.3				$	2.7				(89	)%
Catalysts		11.9					13.0				(8	)%
Fine Chemicals		—					—				—	%
Corporate & other		—					—				—	%

Total equity in net income of unconsolidated investments	$	12.2				$	15.7				(22	)%

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Polymer Additives	$	(1.7	)			$	(4.1	)			(59	)%
Catalysts		—					—				—	%
Fine Chemicals		(2.1	)				(5.2	)			(60	)%
Corporate & other		0.6					0.3				*

Total net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	(3.2	)			$	(9.0	)			(64	)%

Segment income:
Polymer Additives	$	2.9		1.0	%	$	56.2		11.1	%	(95	)%
Catalysts		73.4		17.9	%		94.7		19.5	%	(22	)%
Fine Chemicals		13.9		6.2	%		46.0		15.4	%	(70	)%

Total segment income		90.2					196.9				(54	)%
Corporate & other		(8.9	)				(25.3	)			(65	)%
Port de Bouc charges		(12.4	)				—				*
Restructuring charges		—					(3.3	)			*
Interest and financing expenses		(12.4	)				(18.7	)			(34	)%
Other income, net		0.2					4.8				*
Income tax benefit (expense)		7.2					(29.5	)			*

Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation	$	63.9				$	124.9				(49	)%

*	Calculation is not meaningful.

Polymer Additives

Polymer Additives segment net sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $295.9 million, down $209.2 million, or 41%, versus the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decline is a result of a decrease in volumes primarily in our flame retardants portfolio as a result of the continued softness in the consumer electronics, automotive and construction sectors. Net sales also declined in our stabilizers and curatives product lines primarily due to reduced volumes in antioxidants. Segment income declined 95%, or $53.3 million, to $2.9 million due mainly to lower sales volumes as well as lower production volumes which contributed to unfavorable fixed cost absorption for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.

Catalysts

Catalysts segment net sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $411.2 million, a decrease of $73.3 million, or 15%, versus the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due primarily to unfavorable metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts revenues, foreign currency exchange rates and lower FCC refinery catalysts volumes, and is partially offset by improved pricing in FCC refinery catalysts and Polyolefin catalysts. Segment income decreased 22%, or $21.3 million, to $73.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, due mainly to unfavorable metals impacts on HPC refinery catalysts.

Fine Chemicals

Fine Chemicals segment net sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $224.8 million, a decrease of $74.5 million, or 25%, versus the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Segment income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $13.9 million, down $32.1 million, or 70%, from the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. These declines were due mainly to reduced sales and production volumes in the segment as well as product mix in fine chemistry services.

Corporate and other

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our Corporate and other expenses decreased $16.4 million, or 65%, to $8.9 million from the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to first quarter 2009 adjustments of $7.8 million associated with the reversal of certain long-term employee benefit accruals. This adjustment is primarily included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our consolidated statements of income. In addition, the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 includes further cost savings associated with certain employee benefit expenses.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Overview

The principal uses of cash in our business generally have been investment in our assets, funding working capital and repayment of debt. In 2008, we made a $25.0 million voluntary contribution to our U.S. defined benefit pension plans. Historically, cash to fund the needs of our business has been principally provided by cash from operations, debt financing and equity issuances.

We are continuing our program to improve working capital efficiency and metrics particularly in the areas of accounts receivable and inventory. We expect the combination of our current cash balances and availability under our March 2007 credit agreement, which is discussed below, to remain sufficient to fund working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Cash Flow

Our cash balance decreased by $80.8 million to $172.5 million at June 30, 2009 from $253.3 million at December 31, 2008. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, our operations provided $102.3 million of cash compared to $94.5 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This increase of $7.8 million is due mainly to improved working capital management, partially offset by a decrease in profitability. Cash on hand and cash flow from operations funded capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment of $60.5 million, net repayments of long-term debt of $85.0 million and dividends to shareholders of $21.9 million.

Net current assets decreased $119.8 million to $620.8 million at June 30, 2009 from $740.6 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in net current assets was due primarily to a decrease in cash and inventory, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Capital expenditures of $60.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were associated with plant, machinery and equipment improvements. We expect our capital expenditures to be approximately $90 million in 2009 mainly due to increases in plant, machinery and equipment in our Catalysts and Fine Chemicals segments. However, we are closely monitoring our capital spending in light of the global economic situation and our cash generation as the year progresses. We anticipate that future capital expenditures will be financed primarily with cash flow provided from operations with additional cash needed, if any, provided by borrowings including amounts available under our March 2007 credit agreement. The amount and timing of any additional borrowings will depend on our specific cash requirements.

Long-Term Debt

We currently have outstanding $325.0 million of 5.10% senior notes due in 2015. The senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured indebtedness outstanding from time to time. The senior notes will be effectively subordinated to any of our future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. We may redeem the senior notes before their maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes to be redeemed or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the indenture governing the senior notes) plus 15 basis points, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption.

The principal amount of the senior notes becomes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of certain bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us or certain of our subsidiaries and may be declared immediately due and payable by the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% of the senior notes upon the occurrence of an event of default. Events of default include, among other things: failure to pay principal or interest at required times; failure to perform or remedy a breach of covenants within prescribed periods; an event of default on any of our other indebtedness or certain indebtedness of our subsidiaries of $40.0 million or more that is caused by a failure to make a payment when due or that results in the acceleration of that indebtedness before its maturity; and certain bankruptcy or insolvency events involving us or certain of our subsidiaries. We believe that as of June 30, 2009, we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of the covenants of the indenture governing the senior notes.

For additional funding and liquidity purposes, we currently maintain a $675.0 million five-year unsecured revolving senior credit facility, which we refer to as the March 2007 credit agreement. The March 2007 credit agreement provides for an additional $200.0 million in credit, if needed, upon additional loan commitments by our existing and/or additional lenders. The total spreads and fees can range from 0.32% to 0.675% over the London inter-bank offered rate, or LIBOR, applicable to the currency of denomination of the borrowing and are based upon our credit rating from one of the major credit rating agencies. There were aggregate borrowings outstanding under the March 2007 credit agreement of $395.0 million at June 30, 2009. Borrowings under the March 2007 credit agreement bear interest at variable rates, which was a weighted average of 0.69% during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009.

In March 2008, we exercised an option under the March 2007 credit agreement to extend the maturity date from March 2012 to March 2013. Lenders representing 87.4% of the commitments, or $590 million out of $675 million, approved the extension. No other changes to the agreement were part of the extension, and no fees, other than attorney fees, were paid. As a result of the extension, $85 million and $590 million in commitments now have a maturity/expiration date of March 2012 and March 2013, respectively.

Borrowings under our March 2007 credit agreement are conditioned upon compliance with the following covenants: (a) consolidated funded debt, as defined in the March 2007 credit agreement, must be less than or equal to 3.50 times consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the March 2007 credit agreement, as of the end of any fiscal quarter; (b) consolidated tangible domestic assets, as defined in the March 2007 credit agreement, must be greater than or equal to $750.0 million for us to make investments in entities and enterprises that are organized outside the U.S.; and (c) with the exception of liens specified in our March 2007 credit agreement, liens may not attach to assets when the aggregate amount of all indebtedness secured by such liens plus unsecured indebtedness, other than indebtedness incurred by our subsidiaries under the March 2007 credit agreement would exceed 20% of consolidated net worth, as defined in the March 2007 credit agreement. We believe that as of June 30, 2009, we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of the debt covenants under the March 2007 credit agreement.

The non-current portion of our long-term debt amounted to $820.6 million at June 30, 2009, compared to $906.1 million at December 31, 2008. In addition, at June 30, 2009, we had the ability to borrow $280.0 million under our March 2007 credit agreement and $149.7 million under other existing lines of credit, subject to various financial covenants under our March 2007 credit agreement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, including bank guarantees and letters of credit which totaled approximately $30.2 million at June 30, 2009. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements either has, or is likely to have, a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

Other Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations for plant construction, purchases of equipment and various take or pay and throughput agreements (in thousands):


	3Q 2009		4Q 2009		Sub-total 2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		2014		Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations	$	13,762	$	4,794	$	18,556	$	8,527	$	5,133	$	5,413	$	459,317	$	6,022	$	332,973
Capital lease obligation		—		1,767		1,767		3,687		3,899		2,033		—		—		—
Expected interest payments on long-term debt obligations*		5,423		6,899		12,322		26,837		28,624		30,297		23,354		20,579		2,862
Operating lease obligations (rental)		2,347		2,347		4,694		7,596		5,421		3,893		2,521		2,261		15,830
Take or pay / throughput agreements**		17,734		17,735		35,469		24,406		10,218		4,400		4,334		4,024		7,058
Letters of credit and guarantees		6,179		5,322		11,501		12,269		2,416		771		534		—		2,665
Capital projects		17,200		3,747		20,947		3,577		1,056		—		—		—		—
Facility divestiture obligation		—		5,645		5,645		—		—		—		—		—		—
Additional investment commitment payments		—		45		45		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	62,645	$	48,301	$	110,946	$	86,899	$	56,767	$	46,807	$	490,060	$	32,886	$	361,388

These amounts are based on a weighted-average interest rate of 0.7% for the March 2007 credit agreement, 5.1% for the senior notes, and 4.1% for our remaining long-term debt obligations and capital lease for 2009. The weighted average interest rate for years 2010 and thereafter is 1.9% for the March 2007 credit agreement, 5.1% for the senior notes, and 4.6% for our remaining long-term debt obligations and capital lease.

These amounts primarily relate to contracts entered into with certain third party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes. In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.

Amounts in the table above exclude required employer pension contributions. We have determined that the total expected 2009 contributions to our domestic nonqualified and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans should approximate $10.0 million. We may choose to make additional pension contributions above this amount. We have made $4.2 million and $5.7 million in contributions to our qualified and nonqualified pension plans during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

We are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign requirements regulating the handling, manufacture and use of materials (some of which may be classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies), the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment. To our knowledge, we are currently complying and expect to continue to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws, regulations, statutes and ordinances. Compliance with existing federal, state, local, and foreign environmental protection laws is not expected to have a material effect on earnings or our competitive position, but the costs associated with increased legal or regulatory requirements could have an adverse effect on our results.

Among other environmental requirements, we are subject to the federal Superfund law, and similar state laws, under which we may be designated as a potentially responsible party, or PRP, and may be liable for a share of the costs associated with cleaning up various hazardous waste sites. Management believes that in most cases, our participation is de minimis. Further, almost all such sites represent environmental issues that are quite mature and have been investigated, studied and in many cases settled. In de minimis situations, our policy generally is to negotiate a consent decree and to pay any apportioned settlement, enabling us to be effectively relieved of any further liability as a PRP, except for remote contingencies. In other than de minimis PRP matters, our records indicate that unresolved PRP exposures should be immaterial. We accrue and

expense our proportionate share of PRP costs. Because management has been actively involved in evaluating environmental matters, we are able to conclude that the outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved PRP sites should not be material to operations.

Liquidity Outlook

We anticipate that cash provided from operating activities in the future and borrowings under our March 2007 credit agreement will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund capital expenditures and pension contributions, and make dividend payments for the foreseeable future. In addition, as we have historically done, we will continue to evaluate the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions of businesses or assets, which may require additional liquidity.

While we maintain business relationships with a diverse group of financial institutions, their continued viability is not certain and could lead them to not honor their contractual credit commitments or to not renew their extensions of credit or provide new sources of credit. In recent quarters, the capital markets have become increasingly volatile as a result of adverse conditions that have caused the consolidation, failure and near failure of a number of large financial services companies. If the capital markets continue to experience volatility and the availability of funds remains limited, we may incur increased costs associated with borrowings. In addition, it is possible that our ability to access the capital markets may be limited by these or other factors at a time when we would need or desire to do so, which could have an impact on our ability to finance our businesses or react to changing economic and business conditions. While we believe that recent governmental and regulatory actions reduce the risk of a further deterioration or systemic contraction of capital markets, there can be no certainty that our liquidity will not be negatively impacted. In addition, our cash flows from operations may be adversely affected by adverse consequences to our customers and the markets in which we compete as a result of the current financial, economic, and capital market conditions and uncertainty.

At June 30, 2009, we had the ability to borrow in excess of $400 million under our March 2007 credit agreement and other existing lines of credit, subject to various financial covenants under our March 2007 credit agreement. With generally strong cash generative businesses and no significant debt maturities before 2013, we believe we have a solid liquidity position given the current financial market situation.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no significant changes in our interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate exposure, marketable securities price risk, or raw material price risk from the information we provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 except as noted below.

We had outstanding variable interest rate borrowings at June 30, 2009 of $463.9 million, bearing an average interest rate of 0.69%. A hypothetical 10% change (approximately 7 basis points) in the interest rate applicable to these borrowings would change our annualized interest expense by approximately $0.3 million as of June 30, 2009. We may enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.

Our financial instruments, which are subject to foreign currency exchange risk, consist of foreign currency forward contracts and represented a net asset position of a minimal amount at June 30, 2009. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio assuming instantaneous 10% changes in select foreign currency exchange rates from their levels as of June 30, 2009, with all other variables held constant. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies that we have hedging contracts against would result in an increase of $0.7 million in the fair value of our foreign currency exchange hedging contracts. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies would result in a decrease of $0.8 million in the fair value of our foreign currency exchange hedging contracts. The sensitivity in fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio represents changes in fair values estimated based on market conditions as of June 30, 2009, without reflecting the effects of underlying anticipated transactions. When those anticipated transactions are realized, actual effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows in future periods.

In 2004, we entered into treasury lock agreements, or T-locks, with a notional value of $275.0 million, to fix the yield on the U.S. Treasury security used to set the yield for approximately 85% of our January 2005 public offering of the senior notes. The T-locks fixed the yield on the U.S. Treasury security at approximately 4.25%. The value of the T-locks resulted from the difference between (1) the yield-to-maturity of the 10-year U.S. Treasury security that had the maturity date most comparable to the maturity date of the senior notes issued and (2) the fixed rate of approximately 4.25%. The cumulative loss effect of the T-lock agreements was $2.2 million and is being amortized over the life of the senior notes as an adjustment to

the senior notes’ interest expense. At June 30, 2009, there were losses of approximately $1.2 million ($0.8 million after income taxes) in accumulated other comprehensive loss that remain to be expensed.

In addition, certain of our operations use natural gas as a source of energy which can expose our business to market risk when the price of natural gas changes suddenly. In an attempt to mitigate the impact and volatility of price swings in the natural gas market, we purchase natural gas contracts, when appropriate, for a portion of our 12-month rolling forecast for North American natural gas requirements.

We also enter into natural gas hedge transactions from time to time with major financial institutions. Such derivatives are held to secure natural gas at fixed prices and not for trading. Our natural gas hedge contracts qualify as cash flow hedges and are marked to market. The unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and accounted for in accumulated other comprehensive loss to the extent that the unrealized gains and losses are offset by the forecasted transaction. At June 30, 2009, there were no natural gas hedge contracts outstanding and none were purchased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. Additionally, any unrealized gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are not offset by the forecasted transaction are recorded in earnings as appropriate, but generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings of types regarded as common in our businesses, particularly administrative or judicial proceedings seeking remediation under environmental laws, such as Superfund, products liability and premises liability litigation. We maintain a financial accrual for these proceedings that includes defense costs and potential damages, as estimated by our general counsel. We also maintain insurance to mitigate certain of such risks. Additional information with respect to this Item 1 is contained in Note 10 to the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

While we attempt to identify, manage and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with our business to the extent practical under the circumstances, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be present. Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 describes some of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our results of operations and our financial condition. We do not believe that there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table summarizes our repurchases of equity securities for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009:


Period	Total Number of Shares Repurchased	Average Price Paid Per share	Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program *	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plans or Programs *
April 1, 2009 to April 30, 2009	—	—	—	4,400,000
May 1, 2009 to May 31, 2009	—	—	—	4,400,000
June 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009	—	—	—	4,400,000

Total	—	—	—	4,400,000

The stock repurchase plan, which was authorized by our Board of Directors, became effective on October 25, 2000 and included ten million shares. On February 27, 2008 after 98% of the originally authorized repurchase was executed, our Board of Directors approved an increase to five million shares authorized for repurchase under our stock repurchase plan. The stock repurchase plan will expire when we have repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase thereunder, unless the repurchase plan is earlier terminated by action of our Board of Directors or further shares are authorized for repurchase.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The annual meeting of our shareholders was held on May 13, 2009. As of the record date for the annual meeting, there were 91,396,166 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, of which 80,891,973 were represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. The voting shareholders elected the directors named in our Proxy Statement sent to shareholders in connection with the annual meeting with the following affirmative votes and votes withheld:


Director	Affirmative Votes	Withheld Votes
Mark C. Rohr	66,541,313	14,350,660
J. Alfred Broaddus, Jr.	67,142,056	13,749,917
R. William Ide III	51,803,311	29,088,662
Richard L. Morrill	51,789,476	29,102,497
Jim W. Nokes	79,534,588	1,357,385
John Sherman, Jr.	51,821,738	29,070,235
Charles E. Stewart	51,837,205	29,054,768
Harriett Tee Taggart	67,505,423	13,386,550
Anne Marie Whittemore	51,837,590	29,054,383

At the same meeting, our shareholders approved the amendment to the Albemarle Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan. Votes cast with respect to the approval of the amendment were as follows:


Votes for		72,537,941
Votes against		1,984,972
Votes abstain		517,788
Broker non-votes		5,851,272

Total		80,891,973

In addition, shareholders ratified the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Votes cast with respect to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, were as follows:


Votes for		80,724,698
Votes against		135,175
Votes abstain		32,100

Total		80,891,973

There were no broker non-votes with respect to the election of directors or the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits



10.36		First Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	ALBEMARLE CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: August 7, 2009	By:	/s/ RICHARD J. DIEMER, JR.
		Richard J. Diemer, Jr.
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(principal financial and accounting officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents