e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-3880
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
13-1086010 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6363 Main Street
Williamsville, New York
|
|
14221 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 857-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
Common stock, $1 par value, outstanding at January 31, 2010: 81,109,235 shares.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Frequently used abbreviations, acronyms, or terms used in this report:
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Companies |
|
|
Company
|
|
The Registrant, the Registrant and its subsidiaries or the Registrants
subsidiaries as appropriate in the context of the disclosure |
Distribution Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation |
Empire
|
|
Empire Pipeline, Inc. |
ESNE
|
|
Energy Systems North East, LLC |
Highland
|
|
Highland Forest Resources, Inc. |
Horizon
|
|
Horizon Energy Development, Inc. |
Horizon LFG
|
|
Horizon LFG, Inc. |
Horizon Power
|
|
Horizon Power, Inc. |
Midstream Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Midstream Corporation |
Model City
|
|
Model City Energy, LLC |
National Fuel
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
NFR
|
|
National Fuel Resources, Inc. |
Registrant
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
Seneca
|
|
Seneca Resources Corporation |
Seneca Energy
|
|
Seneca Energy II, LLC |
Supply Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation |
|
|
|
Regulatory Agencies |
|
|
EPA
|
|
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
NYDEC
|
|
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
NYPSC
|
|
State of New York Public Service Commission |
PaPUC
|
|
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2009 Form 10-K
|
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2009 |
Bbl
|
|
Barrel (of oil) |
Bcf
|
|
Billion cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Board foot
|
|
A measure of lumber and/or timber equal to 12 inches in length by 12
inches in width by one inch in thickness. |
Btu
|
|
British thermal unit; the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
Capital expenditure
|
|
Represents additions to property, plant, and equipment, or the amount of
money a company spends to buy capital assets or upgrade its existing
capital assets. |
Degree day
|
|
A measure of the coldness of the weather experienced, based on the
extent to which the daily average temperature falls below a reference
temperature, usually 65 degrees Fahrenheit. |
Derivative
|
|
A financial instrument or other contract, the terms of which include an
underlying variable (a price, interest rate, index rate, exchange rate, or
other variable) and a notional amount (number of units, barrels, cubic
feet, etc.). The terms also permit for the instrument or contract to be
settled net and no initial net investment is required to enter into the
financial instrument or contract. Examples include futures contracts,
options, no cost collars and swaps. |
Development costs
|
|
Costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide
facilities for extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas. |
Dth
|
|
Decatherm; one Dth of natural gas has a heating value of 1,000,000
British thermal units, approximately equal to the heating value of 1 Mcf
of natural gas. |
Exchange Act
|
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
-2-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for
long-lived assets
|
|
Includes capital expenditures, stock acquisitions and/or investments in partnerships. |
Exploration costs
|
|
Costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination, as well
as costs incurred in examining specific areas, including drilling
exploratory wells. |
Firm transportation
and/or storage
|
|
The transportation and/or storage service that a supplier of such service
is obligated by contract to provide and for which the customer is
obligated to pay whether or not the service is utilized. |
GAAP
|
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
|
Goodwill
|
|
An intangible asset representing the difference between the fair value of
a company and the price at which a company is purchased. |
Hedging
|
|
A method of minimizing the impact of price, interest rate, and/or foreign
currency exchange rate changes, often times through the use of
derivative financial instruments. |
Hub
|
|
Location where pipelines intersect enabling the trading, transportation,
storage, exchange, lending and borrowing of natural gas. |
Interruptible transportation
|
|
|
and/or storage
|
|
The transportation and/or storage service that, in accordance with
contractual arrangements, can be interrupted by the supplier of such
service, and for which the customer does not pay unless utilized. |
LIBOR
|
|
London Interbank Offered Rate |
LIFO
|
|
Last-in, first-out |
Mbbl
|
|
Thousand barrels (of oil) |
Mcf
|
|
Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) |
MD&A
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
MDth
|
|
Thousand decatherms (of natural gas) |
MMBtu
|
|
Million British thermal units |
MMcf
|
|
Million cubic feet (of natural gas) |
NGA
|
|
The Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended; the federal law regulating
interstate natural gas pipeline and storage companies, among other
things, codified beginning at 15 U.S.C. Section 717. |
NYMEX
|
|
New York Mercantile Exchange. An exchange which maintains a futures
market for crude oil and natural gas. |
Open Season
|
|
A bidding procedure used by pipelines to allocate firm transportation or
storage capacity among prospective shippers, in which all bids
submitted during a defined time period are evaluated as if they had
been submitted simultaneously. |
Proved developed reserves
|
|
Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells
with existing equipment and operating methods. |
Proved undeveloped
reserves
|
|
Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major
expenditure is
required to make these reserves productive. |
Reserves
|
|
The unproduced but recoverable oil and/or gas in place in a formation
which has been proven by production. |
Restructuring
|
|
Generally referring to partial deregulation of the pipeline and/or utility
industry by statutory or regulatory process. Restructuring of federally
regulated natural gas pipelines resulted in the separation (or
unbundling) of gas commodity service from transportation service for
wholesale and large-volume retail markets. State restructuring
programs attempt to extend the same process to retail mass markets. |
S&P
|
|
Standard & Poors Rating Service |
SAR
|
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation right |
Stock acquisitions
|
|
Investments in corporations. |
Unbundled service
|
|
A service that has been separated from other services, with rates
charged that reflect only the cost of the separated service. |
VEBA
|
|
Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association |
-3-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Concl.) |
|
|
|
|
|
WNC
|
|
Weather normalization clause; a clause in utility rates which adjusts
customer rates to allow a utility to recover its normal operating costs
calculated at normal temperatures. If temperatures during the
measured period are warmer than normal, customer rates are adjusted
upward in order to recover projected operating costs. If
temperatures
during the measured period are colder than normal, customer
rates
are adjusted downward so that only the projected operating costs
will
be recovered. |
-4-
INDEX
|
|
The Company has nothing to report under this item. |
Reference to the Company in this report means the Registrant or the Registrant and its
subsidiaries collectively, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure. All references to a
certain year in this report are to the Companys fiscal year ended September 30 of that year,
unless otherwise noted.
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary
statements and important factors included in this Form 10-Q at Item 2 MD&A, under the heading
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-looking statements are all statements other
than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding future
prospects, plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, future events or performance and
underlying assumptions, capital structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion of
construction and other projects, projections for pension and other post-retirement benefit
obligations, impacts of the adoption of new accounting rules, and possible outcomes of litigation
or regulatory proceedings, as well as statements that are identified by the use of the words
anticipates, estimates, expects, forecasts, intends, plans, predicts, projects,
believes, seeks, will, may, and similar expressions.
-5-
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
457,011 |
|
|
$ |
607,163 |
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
172,787 |
|
|
|
328,733 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
94,497 |
|
|
|
100,887 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
18,762 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
44,955 |
|
|
|
42,342 |
|
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
330,898 |
|
|
|
673,535 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
126,113 |
|
|
|
(66,372 |
) |
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Impairment of Investment in Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,804 |
) |
Interest Income |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(22,063 |
) |
|
|
(18,056 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
104,577 |
|
|
|
(77,967 |
) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
|
(35,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock |
|
|
64,499 |
|
|
|
(42,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1 |
|
|
948,293 |
|
|
|
953,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,012,792 |
|
|
|
911,121 |
|
Adoption of Authoritative Guidance for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
Dividends on
Common Stock (2009 - $0.335; 2008 - $0.325) |
|
|
(27,129 |
) |
|
|
(25,841 |
) |
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
985,663 |
|
|
$ |
884,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
(0.54 |
) |
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
80,612,303 |
|
|
|
79,289,005 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
82,172,649 |
|
|
|
80,167,893 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-6-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
5,245,050 |
|
|
$ |
5,183,527 |
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion
and Amortization |
|
|
2,078,625 |
|
|
|
2,051,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,166,425 |
|
|
|
3,132,045 |
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
404,401 |
|
|
|
408,053 |
|
Cash Held in Escrow |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
Receivables Net of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts of
$42,955 and $38,334, Respectively |
|
|
176,202 |
|
|
|
144,466 |
|
Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
55,012 |
|
|
|
18,884 |
|
Gas Stored Underground |
|
|
49,042 |
|
|
|
55,862 |
|
Materials and Supplies at average cost |
|
|
28,501 |
|
|
|
24,520 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
64,052 |
|
|
|
68,474 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
48,621 |
|
|
|
53,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
828,923 |
|
|
|
776,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable Future Taxes |
|
|
138,435 |
|
|
|
138,435 |
|
Unamortized Debt Expense |
|
|
14,249 |
|
|
|
14,815 |
|
Other Regulatory Assets |
|
|
522,669 |
|
|
|
530,913 |
|
Deferred Charges |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
2,737 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
77,692 |
|
|
|
78,503 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
14,728 |
|
|
|
16,257 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
21,087 |
|
|
|
21,536 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
19,791 |
|
|
|
44,817 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
|
6,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
822,353 |
|
|
|
860,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,817,701 |
|
|
$ |
4,769,129 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-7-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
Authorized 200,000,000 Shares;
Issued And Outstanding 80,981,933 Shares
And 80,499,915 Shares, Respectively |
|
$ |
80,982 |
|
|
$ |
80,500 |
|
Paid in Capital |
|
|
620,601 |
|
|
|
602,839 |
|
Earnings Reinvested in the Business |
|
|
985,663 |
|
|
|
948,293 |
|
|
Total Common Shareholder Equity Before
Items of Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
1,687,246 |
|
|
|
1,631,632 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
(52,702 |
) |
|
|
(42,396 |
) |
|
Total Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,634,544 |
|
|
|
1,589,236 |
|
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Portion |
|
|
1,049,000 |
|
|
|
1,249,000 |
|
|
Total Capitalization |
|
|
2,683,544 |
|
|
|
2,838,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
108,404 |
|
|
|
90,723 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
94,468 |
|
|
|
105,778 |
|
Dividends Payable |
|
|
27,129 |
|
|
|
26,967 |
|
Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
17,203 |
|
|
|
32,031 |
|
Customer Advances |
|
|
30,653 |
|
|
|
24,555 |
|
Customer Security Deposits |
|
|
19,565 |
|
|
|
17,430 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
19,451 |
|
|
|
18,875 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
516,873 |
|
|
|
318,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
670,989 |
|
|
|
663,876 |
|
Taxes Refundable to Customers |
|
|
67,050 |
|
|
|
67,046 |
|
Unamortized Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
Cost of Removal Regulatory Liability |
|
|
120,797 |
|
|
|
105,546 |
|
Other Regulatory Liabilities |
|
|
116,035 |
|
|
|
120,229 |
|
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Liabilities |
|
|
401,737 |
|
|
|
415,888 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
|
91,538 |
|
|
|
91,373 |
|
Other Deferred Credits |
|
|
145,324 |
|
|
|
144,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,284 |
|
|
|
1,612,386 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
|
$ |
4,817,701 |
|
|
$ |
4,769,129 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-8-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
64,499 |
|
|
$ |
(42,678 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,811 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
44,955 |
|
|
|
42,342 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
(69,626 |
) |
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Net of
Cash Distributions |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
Impairment of Investment in Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
(13,437 |
) |
|
|
(5,927 |
) |
Other |
|
|
7,958 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(3,742 |
) |
Receivables and Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
(67,882 |
) |
|
|
(98,914 |
) |
Gas Stored Underground and Materials and Supplies |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
20,971 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,992 |
|
Prepayments and Other Current Assets |
|
|
17,859 |
|
|
|
14,958 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
11,408 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
(11,310 |
) |
|
|
1,962 |
|
Customer Advances |
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
(2,924 |
) |
Customer Security Deposits |
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
(13,536 |
) |
|
|
29,053 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
16,967 |
|
|
|
12,560 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
(22,667 |
) |
|
|
(6,217 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
68,333 |
|
|
|
100,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(62,135 |
) |
|
|
(84,268 |
) |
Investment in Partnership |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(62,452 |
) |
|
|
(84,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
13,437 |
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
Dividends Paid on Common Stock |
|
|
(26,967 |
) |
|
|
(25,714 |
) |
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
6,989 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
(9,533 |
) |
|
|
53,202 |
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
68,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at October 1 |
|
|
408,053 |
|
|
|
68,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at December 31 |
|
$ |
404,401 |
|
|
$ |
136,685 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-9-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
64,499 |
|
|
$ |
(42,678 |
) |
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Unrealized Loss on Securities Available for Sale
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(4,853 |
) |
|
|
118,880 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Gains on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
(12,052 |
) |
|
|
(28,792 |
) |
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax |
|
|
(17,601 |
) |
|
|
80,064 |
|
|
Income Tax Benefit Related to Unrealized Loss
on Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(3,791 |
) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
48,128 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax Expense on
Realized Gains from Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
(4,962 |
) |
|
|
(11,411 |
) |
|
Income Taxes
Net |
|
|
(7,295 |
) |
|
|
32,926 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(10,306 |
) |
|
|
47,138 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
54,193 |
|
|
$ |
4,460 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-10-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates its majority owned entities. The equity
method is used to account for minority owned entities. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassification. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year
presentation.
Earnings for Interim Periods. The Company, in its opinion, has included all adjustments that are
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the reported periods. The
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included herein, should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 that
are included in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements for the year
ended September 30, 2010 will be audited by the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm after the end of the fiscal year.
The earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2009 should not be taken as a prediction
of earnings for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. Most of the business of the
Utility and Energy Marketing segments is seasonal in nature and is influenced by weather
conditions. Due to the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, earnings during the winter months normally represent a substantial part of the earnings
that those segments are expected to achieve for the entire fiscal year. The Companys business
segments are discussed more fully in Note 7 Business Segment Information.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows,
the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of generally three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
At December 31, 2009, the Company accrued $15.4 million of capital expenditures in the
Exploration and Production segment, the majority of which was in the Appalachian region. This
amount was excluded from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at December 31, 2009 since it
represented a non-cash investing activity at that date.
At September 30, 2009, the Company accrued $9.1 million of capital expenditures in the
Exploration and Production segment, the majority of which was in the Appalachian region. The
Company also accrued $0.7 million of capital expenditures in the All Other category related to the
construction of the Midstream Covington Gathering System. These amounts were excluded from the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at September 30, 2009 since they represented non-cash
investing activities at that date. These capital expenditures were paid during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 and have been included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at December
31, 2009.
At December 31, 2008, the Company accrued $51.7 million of capital expenditures in the
Exploration and Production segment, the majority of which was for lease acquisitions in the
Appalachian region. This amount was excluded from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at
December 31, 2008 since it represented a non-cash investing activity at that date.
-11-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
At September 30, 2008, the Company accrued $16.8 million of capital expenditures related to
the construction of the Empire Connector project. This amount was excluded from the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows at September 30, 2008 since it represented a non-cash investing activity at
that date. These capital expenditures were paid during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 and
have been included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at December 31, 2008.
Hedging Collateral Deposits. This is an account title for cash held in margin accounts funded by
the Company to serve as collateral for open hedging positions. At December 31, 2009, the Company
had hedging collateral deposits of $0.2 million related to its exchange-traded futures contracts
and $0.9 million related to its over-the-counter crude oil swap agreements. It is the Companys
policy to not offset hedging collateral deposits paid or received against the derivative financial
instruments liability or asset balances.
Cash Held in Escrow. On July 20, 2009, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary in the Exploration
and Production segment, Seneca, acquired Ivanhoe Energys United States oil and gas operations for
approximately $39.2 million in cash (including cash acquired of $4.3 million). The cash acquired
at acquisition includes $2 million held in escrow at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
Seneca placed this amount in escrow as part of the purchase price, and in accordance with the
purchase agreement, this amount will remain in escrow for one year from the closing of the
transaction provided there are no pending disputes or actions regarding obligations and liabilities
required to be satisfied or discharged by Ivanhoe Energy. If no disputes occur, this cash will be
released to Ivanhoe Energy.
Gas Stored Underground Current. In the Utility segment, gas stored underground current is
carried at lower of cost or market, on a LIFO method. Gas stored underground current normally
declines during the first and second quarters of the year and is replenished during the third and
fourth quarters. In the Utility segment, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage
is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities.
Such reserve, which amounted to $8.9 million at December 31, 2009, is reduced to zero by September
30 of each year as the inventory is replenished.
Property, Plant and Equipment. In the Companys Exploration and Production segment, oil and gas
property acquisition, exploration and development costs are capitalized under the full cost method
of accounting. Under this methodology, all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration
and development activities are capitalized, including internal costs directly identified with
acquisition, exploration and development activities. The internal costs that are capitalized do not
include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead, or similar activities. The
Company does not recognize any gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas
properties unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized
costs and proved reserves of oil and gas attributable to a cost center.
Capitalized costs include costs related to unproved properties, which are excluded from
amortization until proved reserves are found or it is determined that the unproved properties are
impaired. All costs related to unproved properties are reviewed quarterly to determine if
impairment has occurred. The amount of any impairment is transferred to the pool of capitalized
costs being amortized.
Capitalized costs are subject to the SEC full cost ceiling test. The ceiling test, which is
performed each quarter, determines a limit, or ceiling, on the amount of property acquisition,
exploration and development costs that can be capitalized. The ceiling under this test represents
(a) the present value of estimated future net cash flows, excluding future cash outflows associated
with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, using a
discount factor of 10%, which is computed by applying current market prices of oil and gas (as
adjusted for hedging) to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date
of the latest balance sheet, less estimated future expenditures, plus (b) the cost of unevaluated
properties not being depleted, less (c) income tax effects related to the differences between the
book and tax basis of the properties. If capitalized costs, net of accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the ceiling at the end of any
quarter, a permanent impairment is required to be charged to earnings in that quarter. The
Companys capitalized costs exceeded the full cost ceiling for the Companys oil and gas
-12-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
properties at December 31, 2008. As such, the Company recognized a pre-tax impairment of
$182.8 million at December 31, 2008. Deferred income taxes of $74.6 million were recorded
associated with this impairment. At December 31, 2009, the Companys capitalized costs were below
the full cost ceiling for the Companys oil and gas properties. As such, an impairment charge was
not required at December 31, 2009.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net
of related tax effect, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
Funded Status of the Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
|
$ |
(63,802 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,802 |
) |
Cumulative Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Net Unrealized Gain on Derivative
Financial Instruments |
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
18,491 |
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities
Available for Sale |
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss |
|
$ |
(52,702 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
available for common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For purposes of determining diluted earnings per common share, the only potentially dilutive
securities the Company has outstanding are stock options and stock-settled SARs. The diluted
weighted average shares outstanding shown on the Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the
potential dilution as a result of these stock options and stock-settled SARs as determined using
the Treasury Stock Method. Stock options and stock-settled SARs that are antidilutive are excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share. For the quarter ended December 31,
2009, there were no stock options and 24,000 stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, there were 765,000 stock options and 365,000 stock-settled
SARs excluded as being antidilutive.
New Authoritative Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance. In September 2006, the FASB issued
authoritative guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. This guidance serves
to clarify the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the
information used to measure fair value, and the effect that fair-value measurements have on
earnings. This guidance is to be applied whenever assets or liabilities are to be measured at fair
value. On October 1, 2008, the Company adopted this guidance for financial assets and financial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The FASBs
authoritative guidance for using fair value to measure nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities on a nonrecurring basis became effective during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
The Companys nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities were not impacted by this guidance
during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The Company has identified Goodwill as being the major
nonfinancial asset that may be impacted by the adoption of this guidance. The impact of this
guidance will be known when the Company performs its annual test for goodwill impairment at the end
of the fiscal year; however, at this time, it is not expected to be material. The Company has
identified Asset Retirement Obligations as a nonfinancial liability that may be impacted by the
adoption of the guidance. The impact of this guidance will be known when the Company recognizes
new asset retirement obligations. However, at this time, the Company believes the impact of the
guidance will be immaterial.
-13-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
In December 2007, the FASB revised authoritative guidance that significantly changes the
accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent
consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in process research and development and
restructuring costs. In addition, under this guidance, changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement
period will impact income tax expense. This authoritative guidance became effective for the Company
as of October 1, 2009. The Company will apply this guidance to future business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that changes the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests (NCI)
and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changed the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. This authoritative guidance became
effective for the Company as of October 1, 2009. This guidance currently does not have an impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance concerning whether certain instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance specified
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. The two class method allocates undistributed earnings between common
shares and participating securities. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 and determined that its participating securities (restricted stock awards) have an
immaterial impact on the Companys earnings per share calculation. Therefore, the Company has not
presented its earnings per share pursuant to the two class method.
On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued a final rule on Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting.
The final rule modifies the SECs reporting and disclosure rules for oil and gas reserves and
aligns the full cost accounting rules with the revised disclosures. The most notable changes of the
final rule include the replacement of the single day period-end pricing to value oil and gas
reserves to a 12-month average of the first day of the month price for each month within the
reporting period. The final rule also permits voluntary disclosure of probable and possible
reserves, a disclosure previously prohibited by SEC rules. Additionally, on January 6, 2010, the
FASB amended the oil and gas accounting standards to conform to the SEC final rule on Modernization
of Oil and Gas Reporting. The revised reporting and disclosure requirements are effective for the
Companys Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of these rules will have on its
consolidated financial statements and MD&A disclosures.
In March 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that expands the disclosures required in
an employers financial statements about pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assets. The
additional disclosures include more details on how investment allocation decisions are made, the
plans investment policies and strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period, and
disclosure regarding significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The additional
disclosure requirements are required for the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this authoritative guidance
will have on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued amended authoritative guidance to improve and clarify financial
reporting requirements by companies involved with variable interest entities. The new guidance
requires a company to perform an analysis to determine whether the companys variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The analysis also
assists in identifying the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This authoritative
guidance is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that adoption of this authoritative guidance will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
-14-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 2 Fair Value Measurements
The FASB authoritative guidance regarding fair value measurements establishes a fair-value
hierarchy and prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques that measure fair value. Those
inputs are prioritized into three levels. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement
date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly at the measurement date.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability at the measurement date. The
Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their
placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys
financial assets and liabilities (as applicable) that were accounted for at fair value on a
recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009. Financial assets and liabilities
are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair
value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Fair Value Measures |
|
At fair value as of December 31, 2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
385,813 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
385,813 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
17,315 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
19,791 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
23,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,809 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
413,339 |
|
|
$ |
17,315 |
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
430,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring Fair Value Measures |
|
At fair value as of September 30, 2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
390,462 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
390,462 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
12,536 |
|
|
|
26,969 |
|
|
|
44,817 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
24,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,276 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
420,898 |
|
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
|
$ |
26,969 |
|
|
$ |
460,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents
The cash equivalents reported in Level 1 consist of SEC registered money market mutual funds.
Derivative Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2009, the derivative financial instruments reported in Level 1 consist of
NYMEX futures contracts used in the Companys Energy Marketing and Pipeline and Storage segments
(at September 30, 2009, the derivative financial instruments reported in Level 1 consist of NYMEX
futures used in the Companys Energy Marketing segment). Hedging collateral deposits of $0.2
million associated with these futures contracts have been reported in Level 1 as well. The
derivative financial instruments
-15-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
reported in Level 2 consist of natural gas and some of the crude oil swap agreements used in the
Companys Exploration and Production segment and natural gas swap agreements used in the Energy
Marketing segment at December 31, 2009 (at September 30, 2009, the derivative financial instruments
reported in Level 2 consist of natural gas swap agreements used in the Companys Exploration and
Production and Energy Marketing segments). The fair value of these swap agreements is based on an
internal model that uses observable inputs. At December 31, 2009, the derivative financial
instruments reported in Level 3 consist of a majority of the Exploration and Production segments
crude oil swap agreements (at September 30, 2009, all of the Exploration and Production segments
crude oil swap agreements were reported as Level 3). The fair value of the crude oil swap
agreements is based on an internal model that uses both observable and unobservable inputs. Based
on an assessment of the counterparties credit risk, the fair market value of the price swap
agreements reported as Level 2 and 3 assets have been reduced by $0.2 million and $0.9 million at
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The fair market value of the price swap
agreements reported as Level 2 liabilities at September 30, 2009 has been reduced by less than $0.1
million based on an assessment of the Companys credit risk. These credit reserves were determined
by applying default probabilities to the anticipated cash flows that the Company is either
expecting from its counterparties or expecting to pay to its counterparties.
At December 31, 2009, $0.9 million in hedging collateral deposits reported in Level 1 are
associated with the Level 3 derivative financial instruments used by the Exploration and Production
segment. The Companys internal model may yield a different fair value than the fair value
determined by the Companys counterparties. The Companys requirement to post hedging collateral
deposits is based on the fair value determined by the Companys counterparties.
Other Investments
The other investments reported in Level 1 consist of publicly traded equity securities and a
publicly traded balanced equity mutual fund.
The tables listed below provide reconciliations of the beginning and ending net balances for
assets and liabilities measured at fair value and classified as Level 3 for the quarters ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Fair Value Measurements Using Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains/Losses Realized and Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Other |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
In/Out of |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
$ |
26,969 |
|
|
$ |
(3,135 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
(23,983 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,969 |
|
|
$ |
(3,135 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,983 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are reported in Operating Revenues in the Consolidated Statement of
Income for the three months ended December 31, 2009. |
-16-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains/Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Included in Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Transfer In/Out of Level 3 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
$ |
7,110 |
|
|
$ |
(3,716 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
79,636 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,110 |
|
|
$ |
(3,716 |
) |
|
$ |
79,636 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
$ |
(777 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,104 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
12,881 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(777 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,104 |
) |
|
$ |
12,881 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are reported in Operating Revenues in the Consolidated Statement of
Income for the three months ended December 31, 2008. |
Note 3 Financial Instruments
Long-Term Debt. The fair market value of the Companys debt, as presented in the table below, was
determined using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates the Companys credit risk in
determining the yield, and subsequently, the fair market value of the debt. Based on these
criteria, the fair market value of long-term debt, including current portion, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
1,249,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,345,127 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,347,368 |
|
Other Investments. Investments in life insurance are stated at their cash surrender values or net
present value as discussed below. Investments in an equity mutual fund and the stock of an
insurance company (marketable equity securities), as discussed below, are stated at fair value
based on quoted market prices.
Other investments include cash surrender values of insurance contracts (net present value in
the case of split-dollar collateral assignment arrangements) and marketable equity securities. The
values of the insurance contracts amounted to $53.9 million at December 31, 2009 and $54.2 million
at September 30, 2009. The fair value of the equity mutual fund was $16.4 million at December 31,
2009 and $15.8 million at September 30, 2009. The gross unrealized loss on this equity mutual fund
was $0.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $1.0 million at September 30, 2009. Management does not
consider this investment to be other than temporarily impaired. The fair value of the stock of an
insurance company was $7.2 million at December 31, 2009 and $8.3 million at September 30, 2009. The
gross unrealized gain on this stock was $4.8 million at December 31, 2009 and $5.9 million at
September 30, 2009. The insurance contracts and marketable equity securities are primarily informal
funding mechanisms for various benefit obligations the Company has to certain employees.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The
primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is commodity price risk in the Exploration and
Production, Energy Marketing and Pipeline and Storage segments. The Company enters into futures
contracts and over-the-counter swap agreements for natural gas and crude oil to manage the price
risk associated with forecasted sales of gas and oil. The Company also enters into futures
contracts and swaps to manage the
-17-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
risk associated with forecasted gas purchases, storage of gas, and withdrawal of gas from storage
to meet customer demand. The duration of the Companys hedges do not typically exceed 3 years and
the majority of the positions settle within one year.
The Company has presented its net derivative assets and liabilities on its Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 as shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands) |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Hedging |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Instruments |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
Commodity
Contracts at
December 31, 2009
|
|
Fair Value of
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
Fair Value of
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
Contracts at
September 30, 2009
|
|
Fair Value of
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$ |
44,817 |
|
|
Fair Value of
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
The following table discloses the fair value of derivative contracts on a gross-contract basis
as opposed to the net-contract basis presentation on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December
31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
Designated as |
|
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands) |
|
Hedging |
|
Gross Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Gross Liability Derivatives |
|
Instruments |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Commodity Contracts
at December 31,
2009 |
|
$ |
61,465 |
|
|
$ |
41,674 |
|
Commodity Contracts
at September 30,
2009 |
|
$ |
63,601 |
|
|
$ |
20,932 |
|
Cash Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge
ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in
current earnings.
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Exploration and Production segment had the following
commodity derivative contracts (swaps) outstanding to hedge forecasted sales (where the Company
uses short positions (i.e. positions that pay-off in the event of commodity price decline) to
mitigate the risk of decreasing revenues and earnings):
-18-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
Units |
Natural Gas
|
|
33.0 Bcf (all short positions) |
Crude Oil
|
|
2,665,000 Bbls (all short positions) |
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Energy Marketing segment had the following commodity
derivative contracts (futures contracts and swaps) outstanding to hedge forecasted sales (where the
Company uses short positions to mitigate the risk associated with natural gas price decreases and
its impact on decreasing revenues and earnings) and purchases (where the Company uses long
positions (i.e. positions that pay-off in the event of commodity price increases) to mitigate the
risk of increasing natural gas prices, which would lead to increased purchased gas expense and
decreased earnings):
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
Units |
Natural Gas
|
|
4.1 Bcf (3.7 Bcf short positions (forecasted storage
withdrawals) and 0.4 Bcf long positions (forecasted storage
injections)) |
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Pipeline and Storage segment have the following
commodity derivative contracts (futures contracts) outstanding to hedge forecasted sales (where the
Company uses short positions to mitigate the risk associated with natural gas price decreases and
its impact on decreasing revenues and earnings):
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
Units |
Natural Gas
|
|
0.3 Bcf (all short positions) |
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Exploration and Production segment had $16.3 million
($9.6 million after tax) of gains included in the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance. It
is expected that $17.7 million ($10.4 million after tax) of these gains will be reclassified into
the Consolidated Statement of Income within the next 12 months as the sales of the underlying
commodities are expected to occur. See Note 1, under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, for the
after-tax gain pertaining to derivative financial instruments (Net Unrealized Gain on Derivative
Financial Instruments in Note 1 includes the Exploration and Production, Energy Marketing and
Pipeline and Storage segments).
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Energy Marketing segment had $1.7 million ($1.0 million
after tax) of losses included in the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance. It is expected
that $1.8 million ($1.1 million after tax) of these losses will be reclassified into the
Consolidated Statement of Income within the next 12 months as the sales and purchases of the
underlying commodities occur. See Note 1, under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, for the
after-tax gain pertaining to derivative financial instruments (Net Unrealized Gain on Derivative
Financial Instruments in Note 1 includes the Exploration and Production, Energy Marketing and
Pipeline and Storage segments).
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys Pipeline and Storage segment had less than $0.1 million
of gains included in the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance. It is expected that the full
amount will be reclassified into the Consolidated Statement of Income within the next 12 months as
the sales with underlying commodities are expected to occur. See Note 1, under Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss, for the after-tax gain pertaining to derivative financial instruments (Net
Unrealized Gain on Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 1 includes the Exploration and
Production, Energy Marketing and Pipeline and Storage segments).
-19-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments on the Statement of Financial Performance for the |
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Dollar Amounts in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Gain or |
|
|
|
in Other |
|
|
Derivative Gain or |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
Income (Loss) on |
|
|
Derivative Gain or |
|
|
in the Consolidated |
|
|
|
Income (Loss) on |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Balance Sheet into |
|
|
in the Consolidated |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
Income (Loss) on |
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
Balance Sheet into |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Portion) for the |
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
|
for the Three |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
for the Three Months |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Ended |
|
Relationships |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commodity
Contracts
Exploration &
Production segment |
|
$ |
(7,910 |
) |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
|
$ |
12,040 |
|
|
Operating Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Contracts
Energy Marketing
segment |
|
$ |
3,024 |
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
Operating Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Contracts
Pipeline &
Storage segment |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
Operating Revenue |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value hedges
The Companys Energy Marketing segment utilizes fair value hedges to mitigate risk associated
with fixed price sales commitments, fixed price purchase commitments, and commitments related to
the injection and withdrawal of storage gas. In order to hedge fixed price sales commitments, the
Company enters into long positions to mitigate the risk that after the Company enters into fixed
price sales agreements with its customers, the price of natural gas increases (thereby passing up
the opportunity for higher operating revenue). With fixed price purchase commitments, the Company
enters into short positions to mitigate the risk that after the Company locks into fixed price
purchase deals with its suppliers, the price of natural gas decreases (thereby passing up the
opportunity for lower purchased gas expense). Fair value hedges related to the injection and
withdrawal of storage gas impact purchased gas expense. As of December 31, 2009, the Companys
Energy Marketing segment had fair value hedges covering approximately 9.3 Bcf (7.6 Bcf of fixed
price sales commitments (all long positions), 1.1 Bcf of fixed price purchase commitments (all
short positions), and 0.6 Bcf of commitments related to the withdrawal of storage gas (all short
positions)). For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the
gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item
attributable to the hedged risk completely offset each other in current earnings, as shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
Gain/(Loss) on Derivative |
|
Gain/(Loss) on Commitment |
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
609,000 |
|
|
$ |
(609,000 |
) |
Purchased Gas |
|
$ |
(629,000 |
) |
|
$ |
629,000 |
|
-20-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Derivative Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in the Consolidated |
|
|
|
Location of Derivative Gain |
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
|
or (Loss) Recognized in the |
|
|
for the Three Months Ended |
|
Derivatives in |
|
Consolidated Statement of |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair Value Hedging Relationships |
|
Income |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commodity Contracts
Energy Marketing segment
(1) |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
609 |
|
Commodity Contracts Energy
Marketing segment
(2) |
|
Purchased Gas |
|
$ |
(685 |
) |
Commodity Contracts Energy
Marketing segment
(3) |
|
Purchased Gas |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents hedging of fixed price sales commitments of natural gas. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents hedging of fixed price purchase commitments of natural gas. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents hedging of storage withdrawal commitments of natural gas. |
The Company may be exposed to credit risk on any of the derivative financial instruments that
are in a gain position. Credit risk relates to the risk of loss that the Company would incur as a
result of nonperformance by counterparties pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations.
To mitigate such credit risk, management performs a credit check, and then on a quarterly basis
monitors counterparty credit exposure. The majority of the Companys counterparties are financial
institutions and energy traders. The Company has over-the-counter swap positions with ten
counterparties. On average, the Company has $1.7 million of credit exposure per counterparty. The
Company had not received any collateral from the counterparties at December 31, 2009 since the
Companys gain position on such derivative financial instruments had not exceeded the established
thresholds at which the counterparties would be required to post collateral.
As of December 31, 2009, eight of the ten counterparties to the Companys outstanding
derivative instrument contracts (specifically the over-the-counter swaps) had a common
credit-risk-related contingency feature. In the event the Companys credit rating increases or
falls below a certain threshold (the lower of the S&P or Moodys Debt Rating), the available credit
extended to the Company would either increase or decrease. A decline in the Companys credit
rating, in and of itself, would not cause the Company to be required to increase the level of its
hedging collateral deposits (in the form of cash deposits, letters of credit or treasury debt
instruments). If the Companys outstanding derivative instrument contracts were in a liability
position and the Companys credit rating declined, then additional hedging collateral deposits
would be required. At December 31, 2009, the fair market value of the derivative financial
instrument assets related to these eight counterparties was $14.2 million according to the
Companys internal model (discussed in Note 2 Fair Value Measurements). The Companys internal
model may yield a different fair value than the fair value determined by the Companys
counterparties. The Companys requirement to post hedging collateral deposits is based on the fair
value determined by the Companys counterparties. For its over-the-counter crude oil swap
agreements, the Company was required to pay $0.9 million in hedging collateral deposits at December
31, 2009. This is discussed in Note 1 under Hedging Collateral Deposits.
For its exchange traded futures contracts, which are in an asset position, the Company had
paid $0.2 million in hedging collateral as of December 31, 2009. As these are exchange traded
futures contracts, there are no specific credit-risk related contingency features. The Company
posts hedging collateral based on open positions (i.e. those positions that have been settled for
cash) and margin requirements. This is discussed in Note 1 under Hedging Collateral Deposits.
-21-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Note 4 Income Taxes
The components of federal and state income taxes included in the Consolidated Statement of
Income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
15,070 |
|
|
$ |
26,518 |
|
State |
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
17,335 |
|
|
|
(54,055 |
) |
State |
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
(15,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
|
(35,289 |
) |
Deferred Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
39,904 |
|
|
$ |
(35,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
|
(35,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
39,904 |
|
|
$ |
(35,463 |
) |
|
|
|
Total income taxes as reported differ from the amounts that were computed by applying the
federal income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The following is a reconciliation of
this difference (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
104,403 |
|
|
$ |
(78,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax
Expense (Benefit), Computed at Federal Statutory Rate of 35% |
|
$ |
36,541 |
|
|
$ |
(27,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Reduction) in Taxes Resulting From: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes |
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
(5,039 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
39,904 |
|
|
$ |
(35,463 |
) |
|
|
|
-22-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
745,363 |
|
|
$ |
733,581 |
|
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Costs |
|
|
182,807 |
|
|
|
178,440 |
|
Other |
|
|
45,627 |
|
|
|
54,977 |
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
973,797 |
|
|
|
966,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Costs |
|
|
(211,143 |
) |
|
|
(212,299 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(140,286 |
) |
|
|
(144,686 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
(351,429 |
) |
|
|
(356,985 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
622,368 |
|
|
$ |
610,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred
Tax Liability/(Asset) Current |
|
$ |
(48,621 |
) |
|
$ |
(53,863 |
) |
Net Deferred
Tax Liability Non-Current |
|
|
670,989 |
|
|
|
663,876 |
|
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
622,368 |
|
|
$ |
610,013 |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset relating to a federal net
operating loss carryover of $25.1 million, of which $24.7 million remains at December 31, 2009.
This carryover, which is available as a result of an acquisition, expires in varying amounts
between 2023 and 2029. Although this loss carryover is subject to certain annual limitations, no
valuation allowance was recorded because of managements determination that the amount will be
fully utilized during the carryforward period.
Regulatory liabilities representing the reduction of previously recorded deferred income taxes
associated with rate-regulated activities that are expected to be refundable to customers amounted
to $67.1 million and $67.0 million at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
Also, regulatory assets representing future amounts collectible from customers, corresponding to
additional deferred income taxes not previously recorded because of prior ratemaking practices,
amounted to $138.4 million at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
The Company files federal and various state income tax returns. The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) is currently conducting an examination of the Company for fiscal 2009 in accordance with the
Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). The CAP audit employs a real time review of the Companys
books and tax records by the IRS that is intended to permit issue resolution prior to the filing of
the tax return. While the federal statute of limitations remains open for fiscal 2006 and later
years, IRS examinations for fiscal 2008 and prior years have been completed and the Company
believes such years are effectively settled.
The Company is also subject to various routine state income tax examinations. The Companys
operating subsidiaries mainly operate in four states which have statutes of limitations that
generally expire between three to four years from the date of filing of the income tax return.
-23-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Note 5 Capitalization
Common Stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 728,523 original
issue shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises. The Company also issued 3,200
original issue shares of common stock to the eight non-employee directors of the Company who
receive compensation under the Companys Retainer Policy for Non-Employee Directors, as partial
consideration for the directors services during the three months ended December 31, 2009. Holders
of stock options or restricted stock will often tender shares of common stock to the Company for
payment of option exercise prices and/or applicable withholding taxes. During the three months
ended December 31, 2009, 249,705 shares of common stock were tendered to the Company for such
purposes. The Company considers all shares tendered as cancelled shares restored to the status of
authorized but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law.
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt. Current Portion of Long-Term Debt at December 31, 2009 consists
of $200 million of 7.50% medium-term notes that mature in November 2010.
Note 6 Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures
for the ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and to
comply with regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated
environmental clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
The Company has agreed with the NYDEC to remediate a former manufactured gas plant site
located in New York. The Company has received approval from the NYDEC of a Remedial Design work
plan for this site and has recorded an estimated minimum liability for remediation of this site of
$15.2 million.
At December 31, 2009, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $18.1 million to $22.3
million. The minimum estimated liability of $18.1 million, which includes the $15.2 million
discussed above, has been recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009. The
Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up costs from a combination of rate recovery and
deferred insurance proceeds that are currently recorded as a regulatory liability on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations, new information or other factors could
adversely impact the Company.
Other. The Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business. These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax,
regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings. These
matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost
of service and purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters
could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which
they are resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity
position, or have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
-24-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Note 7 Business Segment Information
The Company has four reportable segments: Utility, Pipeline and Storage, Exploration and
Production and Energy Marketing. The division of the Companys operations into the reported
segments is based upon a combination of factors including differences in products and services,
regulatory environment and geographic factors.
The data presented in the tables below reflect the reported segments and reconciliations to
consolidated amounts. As stated in the 2009 Form 10-K, the Company evaluates segment performance
based on income before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effects of
changes in accounting (when applicable). When these items are not applicable, the Company
evaluates performance based on net income. There have been no changes in the basis of segmentation
nor in the basis of measuring segment profit or loss from those used in the Companys 2009 Form
10-K. There have been no material changes in the amount of assets for any operating segment from
the amounts disclosed in the 2009 Form 10-K.
Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
232,404 |
|
|
$ |
34,504 |
|
|
$ |
106,351 |
|
|
$ |
71,736 |
|
|
$ |
444,995 |
|
|
$ |
11,805 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
457,011 |
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
4,514 |
|
|
$ |
20,257 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(24,771 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
23,013 |
|
|
$ |
10,354 |
|
|
$ |
29,779 |
|
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
$ |
64,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
(905 |
) |
|
$ |
64,499 |
|
Quarter Ended December 31, 2008 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
349,637 |
|
|
$ |
35,267 |
|
|
$ |
96,712 |
|
|
$ |
115,007 |
|
|
$ |
596,623 |
|
|
$ |
10,325 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
607,163 |
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
4,553 |
|
|
$ |
20,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,390 |
|
|
$ |
2,322 |
|
|
$ |
(27,712 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
22,088 |
|
|
$ |
17,176 |
|
|
$ |
(83,557 |
) |
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
(43,694 |
) |
|
$ |
(868 |
) |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
(42,678 |
) |
-25-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Note 8 Intangible Assets
The components of the Companys intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Transportation Contracts |
|
$ |
4,701 |
|
|
$ |
(2,729 |
) |
|
$ |
1,972 |
|
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
Long-Term Gas Purchase Contracts |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
(12,749 |
) |
|
|
19,115 |
|
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,565 |
|
|
$ |
(15,478 |
) |
|
$ |
21,087 |
|
|
$ |
21,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Amortization Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at December 31, 2009
remained unchanged from September 30, 2009. The only activity with regard to intangible assets
subject to amortization was amortization expense as shown in the table above. Amortization expense
for the long-term transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.3 million for the remainder of
2010 and $0.4 million annually for 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Amortization expense for the
long-term gas purchase contracts is estimated to be $1.1 million for the remainder of 2010 and $1.4
million annually for 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
Note 9
Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
|
Three months ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
3,249 |
|
|
$ |
2,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
11,709 |
|
|
|
6,254 |
|
|
|
6,875 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(14,585 |
) |
|
|
(14,489 |
) |
|
|
(6,584 |
) |
|
|
(7,904 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
5,410 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
6,470 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
5,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
|
$ |
6,823 |
|
|
$ |
6,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys policy is to record retirement plan and other post-retirement
benefit costs in the Utility segment on a volumetric basis to reflect the fact that the
Utility segment experiences higher throughput of natural gas in the winter months and lower
throughput of natural gas in the summer months. |
-26-
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (Cont.) |
Prior to the adoption of authoritative guidance related to accounting for defined benefit
pension and other postretirement plans, the Company used June 30th as the measurement date for
financial reporting purposes. In 2009, in accordance with the current authoritative guidance for
defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, the Company began measuring the Plans
assets and liabilities for its pension and other post-retirement benefit plans as of September
30th, its fiscal year end. In making this change and as permitted by the current authoritative
guidance, the Company recorded fifteen months of pension and post-retirement benefits expense
during fiscal 2009. As allowed by the authoritative guidance, these costs were calculated using
June 30, 2008 measurement date data. Three of those months pertained to the period of July 1, 2008
to September 30, 2008. The pension and other post-retirement benefit costs for that period
amounted to $3.8 million and were recorded by the Company during the quarter ended December 31,
2008 as a $3.4 million increase to Other Regulatory Assets in the Companys Utility and Pipeline
and Storage segments and a $0.4 million ($0.2 million after tax) adjustment to earnings reinvested
in the business. In addition, for the Companys non-qualified benefit plan, benefit costs of
$1.3 million were recorded by the Company during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as a
$0.4 million increase to Other Regulatory Assets in the Companys Utility segment and a
$0.9 million ($0.6 million after tax) adjustment to earnings reinvested in the business.
Employer Contributions. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company contributed
$20.2 million to its tax-qualified, noncontributory defined-benefit retirement plan (Retirement
Plan) and $6.2 million to its VEBA trusts and 401(h) accounts for its other post-retirement
benefits. In the remainder of 2010, the Company does not expect to contribute to the Retirement
Plan. It is likely that the Company will have to fund larger amounts to the Retirement Plan
subsequent to fiscal 2010 in order to be in compliance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006. In
the remainder of 2010, the Company expects to contribute in the range of $19.0 million to $20.0
million to its VEBA trusts and 401(h) accounts.
Note 10 Subsequent Events
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for subsequent events, the Company has evaluated
subsequent events through February 5, 2010, which represents the filing date of this Form 10-Q with
the SEC, in order to ensure that this Form 10-Q includes appropriate disclosure of events both
recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2009, and events which occurred
subsequent to December 31, 2009 but were not recognized in the financial statements. As of February
5, 2010, there were no subsequent events which required recognition or disclosure.
-27-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
OVERVIEW
The Company is a diversified energy company consisting of four reportable business segments.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2009 compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the
Company experienced an increase in earnings of $107.2 million, primarily due to higher earnings in
the Exploration and Production segment. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $182.8 million ($108.2 million after tax) that did not recur
during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. In the Companys Exploration and Production segment,
oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development costs are capitalized under the full
cost method of accounting. Such costs are subject to a quarterly ceiling test prescribed by SEC
Regulation S-X Rule 4-10 that determines a limit, or ceiling, on the amount of property
acquisition, exploration and development costs that can be capitalized. At December 31, 2008, due
to significant declines in crude oil and natural gas commodity prices, the book value of the
Companys oil and gas properties exceeded the ceiling, resulting in the impairment charge mentioned
above. For further discussion of the ceiling test results at December 31, 2009 and a sensitivity
analysis to changes in crude oil and natural gas commodity prices, refer to the Critical Accounting
Estimates section below. For further discussion of the Companys earnings, refer to the Results of
Operations section below.
From a capital resources and liquidity perspective, the Company spent $67.7 million on capital
expenditures during the three months ended December 31, 2009, with approximately 70% being spent in
the Exploration and Production segment. Approximately 82% of the Exploration and Production
segment capital expenditures were spent in the Appalachian region, where the Company continues to
emphasize the development of its acreage in the Marcellus Shale. The Company was recently the high
bidder on two tracts of land in the Appalachian region of Pennsylvania at approximately $71.8
million. This transaction is expected to close in March 2010. With this expenditure and other
factors, it is expected that Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures in 2010 will
be $345 million, compared to the previously reported amount of $255 million. The emphasis on
Marcellus Shale development will carry over into the Pipeline and Storage segment, which is
anticipating the need for pipeline and storage capacity as Marcellus Shale production comes on
line. While capital expenditures in the Pipeline and Storage segment were only $7.0 million during
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company continues to see strong interest for pipeline
and storage capacity in the Marcellus Shale region. If such projects in the Pipeline and Storage
segment are to go forward, the most significant expenditures are expected to occur in 2011 and
2012. For further discussion of the Companys capital expenditures, refer to the Capital Resources
and Liquidity section below.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
For a complete discussion of critical accounting estimates, refer to Critical Accounting
Estimates in Item 7 of the Companys 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to that
disclosure other than as set forth below. The information presented below updates and should be
read in conjunction with the critical accounting estimates in that Form 10-K.
Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Costs. The Company, in its Exploration and Production
segment, follows the full cost method of accounting for determining the book value of its oil and
natural gas properties. In accordance with this methodology, the Company is required to perform a
quarterly ceiling test. Under the ceiling test, the present value of future revenues from the
Companys oil and gas reserves based on current market prices (the ceiling) is compared with the
book value of the Companys oil and gas properties at the balance sheet date. If the book value of
the oil and gas properties in any country exceeds the ceiling, a non-cash charge must be recorded
to reduce the book value of the oil and gas properties to the calculated ceiling. At December 31,
2009, the ceiling exceeded the book value of the oil and gas properties by approximately $417
million. The quoted Cushing, Oklahoma spot price for West Texas Intermediate oil at December 31,
2009 was $79.39. The quoted Henry Hub spot price for natural gas at December 31, 2009 was $5.79.
(Note Because actual pricing of the Companys various producing properties varies depending on
their location, the actual various prices received for such production is utilized to calculate the
ceiling, rather than the Cushing oil and Henry Hub prices, which are only indicative of current
prices.) If natural gas prices used in the ceiling test calculation at December 31, 2009 had been
$1 per MMBtu lower, the ceiling would have exceeded the book value of the Companys oil and gas
properties by approximately $360 million. If crude oil prices used in the ceiling test
calculation at
-28-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
December 31, 2009 had been $5 per Bbl lower, the ceiling would have exceeded the book value of the
Companys oil and gas properties by approximately $366 million. If both natural gas and crude oil
prices used in the ceiling test calculation at December 31, 2009 were lower by $1 per MMBtu and $5
per Bbl, respectively, the ceiling would have exceeded the book value of the Companys oil and gas
properties by approximately $309 million. These calculated amounts are based solely on price
changes and do not take into account any other changes to the ceiling test calculation. For a more
complete discussion of the full cost method of accounting, refer to Oil and Gas Exploration and
Development Costs under Critical Accounting Estimates in Item 7 of the Companys 2009 Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
The Company earnings were $64.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 compared to a
loss of $42.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The increase in earnings of $107.2
million is primarily the result of higher earnings in the Exploration and Production segment.
Higher earnings in the Utility and Energy Marketing segments as well as the All Other category
also contributed to the increase. Lower earnings in the Pipeline and Storage segment and a loss in
the Corporate category slightly offset these increases. The Companys loss for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 includes a non-cash $182.8 million impairment charge ($108.2 million after tax)
for the Exploration and Production segments oil and gas producing properties.
Additional discussion of earnings in each of the business segments can be found in the
business segment information that follows. Note that all amounts used in the earnings discussions
are after-tax amounts, unless otherwise noted.
Earnings (Loss) by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
23,013 |
|
|
$ |
22,088 |
|
|
$ |
925 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
17,176 |
|
|
|
(6,822 |
) |
Exploration and Production |
|
|
29,779 |
|
|
|
(83,557 |
) |
|
|
113,336 |
|
Energy Marketing |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable Segments |
|
|
64,238 |
|
|
|
(43,694 |
) |
|
|
107,932 |
|
All Other |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
2,034 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(2,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated |
|
$ |
64,499 |
|
|
$ |
(42,678 |
) |
|
$ |
107,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
Utility Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Retail Sales Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
176,597 |
|
|
$ |
272,418 |
|
|
$ |
(95,821 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
24,406 |
|
|
|
41,333 |
|
|
|
(16,927 |
) |
Industrial |
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,291 |
|
|
|
315,857 |
|
|
|
(113,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
30,695 |
|
|
|
32,011 |
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
Off-System Sales |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
(2,041 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,918 |
|
|
$ |
354,190 |
|
|
$ |
(117,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-29-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Cont.)
Utility Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (MMcf) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
16,824 |
|
|
|
18,166 |
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
Industrial |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
21,220 |
|
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
Transportation |
|
|
17,061 |
|
|
|
17,473 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
Off-System Sales |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,889 |
|
|
|
39,205 |
|
|
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Degree Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colder (Warmer) Than |
December 31 |
|
Normal |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Normal |
|
Prior Year |
Buffalo |
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Erie |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
2009 Compared with 2008
Operating revenues for the Utility segment decreased $117.3 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. This decrease largely
resulted from a $113.6 million decrease in retail gas sales revenues, a $2.0 million decrease in
off-system sales revenues, and a $1.3 million decrease in transportation revenues. The decrease in
retail gas sales revenues of $113.6 million was largely a function of the recovery of lower gas
costs (subject to certain timing variations, gas costs are recovered dollar for dollar in revenues)
and warmer weather. The recovery of lower gas costs resulted from a much lower cost of purchased
gas. The Utility segments average cost of purchased gas, including the cost of transportation and
storage, was $7.08 per Mcf for the three months ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of 27% from the
average cost of $9.70 per Mcf for the three months ended December 31, 2008.
The decrease in off-system sales revenues was largely due to a decrease in off-system sales
volume. Due to profit sharing with retail customers, the margins resulting from off-system sales
are minimal and there was not a material impact to margins. The decrease in transportation revenues
of $1.3 million was primarily due to a 0.4 Bcf decrease in transportation throughput, largely the
result of warmer weather.
The Utility segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 were $23.0 million, an
increase of $0.9 million when compared with earnings of $22.1 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008. In the New York jurisdiction, earnings increased $0.5 million. The positive
earnings impact associated with lower operating expenses of $0.7 million (primarily a decrease in
bad debt expense due to lower gas costs) and routine regulatory adjustments of $0.9 million were
the main factors in the earnings increase. These factors were offset by an increase in interest
expense ($0.9 million) stemming from the borrowing of a portion of the Companys April 2009 debt
issuance. The April 2009 debt was issued at a significantly higher interest rate than the interest
rates on debt that had matured in March 2009. In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased
$0.4 million. The positive earnings impact associated with lower operating costs of $1.5 million
(primarily a decrease in bad debt expense due to lower gas costs) and lower income tax expense of
$1.3 million (due to a lower effective tax rate) were the main factors in the earnings increase.
These factors were largely offset by lower usage per account ($0.9 million), higher interest
expense ($0.9 million), the negative earnings impact of warmer weather ($0.2 million), and routine
regulatory adjustments ($0.1 million). As with the New York jurisdiction, the increase in interest
expense in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction is attributable to the Companys April 2009 debt issuance
and the fact that it was issued at a significantly higher interest rate than the interest rates on
debt that had matured in March 2009.
-30-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The impact of weather variations on earnings in the New York jurisdiction is mitigated by that
jurisdictions weather normalization clause (WNC). The WNC in New York, which covers the
eight-month period from October through May, has had a stabilizing effect on earnings for the New
York rate jurisdiction. For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the WNC preserved $0.2 million of
earnings, as it was warmer than normal. For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the WNC did not
have a significant impact on earnings as the weather was close to normal. In periods of colder than
normal weather, the WNC benefits Distribution Corporations New York customers.
Pipeline and Storage
Pipeline and Storage Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
$ |
36,428 |
|
|
$ |
33,105 |
|
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,733 |
|
|
|
34,208 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Storage Service |
|
|
16,623 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Interruptible Storage Service |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
5,203 |
|
|
|
(3,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,761 |
|
|
$ |
56,104 |
|
|
$ |
(1,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline and Storage Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (MMcf) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
|
80,639 |
|
|
|
102,253 |
|
|
|
(21,614 |
) |
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,394 |
|
|
|
103,872 |
|
|
|
(22,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Compared with 2008
Operating revenues for the Pipeline and Storage segment decreased $1.3 million in the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was
primarily due to a decline in efficiency gas revenues ($3.5 million) reported as part of other
revenues in the table above. This decease was primarily due to lower gas prices and lower
transportation volumes retained during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the
quarter ended December 31, 2008. It also reflects a lower gain, quarter over quarter, on the sale
of such retained efficiency gas volumes held in inventory. Under Supply Corporations tariff with
shippers, Supply Corporation is allowed to retain a set percentage of shipper-supplied gas to cover
compressor fuel costs and other operational purposes. To the extent that Supply Corporation does
not need all of the gas to cover such operational needs, it is allowed to keep the excess gas as
inventory. That inventory is later sold to customers. The excess gas that is retained as
inventory as well as any gains resulting from the sale of such inventory represent efficiency gas
revenue to Supply Corporation. Interruptible transportation revenues also decreased $0.8 million
due primarily to a decrease in the gathering rate Supply Corporation is allowed to charge.
Partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in firm transportation revenues of $3.3 million.
This increase was primarily the result of higher revenues from the Empire Connector, which was
placed in service in December 2008. While transportation volume decreased by 22.5 Bcf largely due
to warmer weather and lower industrial demand, volume fluctuations generally do not have a
significant impact on revenues as a result of Supply Corporation and Empires straight
fixed-variable rate design.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 were
$10.4 million, a decrease of $6.8 million when compared with earnings of $17.2 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008. The earnings decrease was primarily due to lower efficiency gas
revenues of $2.3 million, as discussed above. Higher depreciation expense ($0.6 million), higher
interest expense ($1.9 million), higher property taxes ($0.6 million), higher operating expenses
($0.6 million) and a decrease in the allowance for funds used during construction ($2.7 million)
all contributed to the decrease in earnings. The decrease in allowance for funds used during
construction (equity component) is a result
-31-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
of the construction of the Empire Connector, which was completed and placed in service on December
10, 2008. The increase in both depreciation expense and property taxes is primarily a result of
the Empire Connector being placed in service in December 2008. The increase in operating expenses
can primarily be attributed to higher pension expense. The increase in interest expense can be
attributed to higher debt balances and a higher average interest rate on borrowings combined with
a decrease in the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction resulting from the
completion of the Empire Connector. The increase in the average interest rate stems from the
Companys April 2009 debt issuance. The decreases were partially offset by the earnings impact
associated with higher transportation revenues of $1.6 million, as discussed above.
Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
40,868 |
|
|
$ |
41,093 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
Oil (after Hedging) |
|
|
62,695 |
|
|
|
53,071 |
|
|
|
9,624 |
|
Gas Processing Plant |
|
|
7,208 |
|
|
|
7,328 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
Other |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
Intrasegment Elimination (1) |
|
|
(4,467 |
) |
|
|
(5,197 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,351 |
|
|
$ |
96,712 |
|
|
$ |
9,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the elimination of certain West Coast gas production revenue included
in Gas (after Hedging) in the table above that was sold to the gas processing plant shown in the
table above. An elimination for the same dollar amount was made to reduce the gas processing
plants Purchased Gas expense. |
Production Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas Production (MMcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production |
|
|
6,488 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Production (Mbbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Appalachia |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Average Gas Price/Mcf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
4.84 |
|
|
$ |
7.04 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
West Coast |
|
$ |
4.64 |
|
|
$ |
5.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
|
$ |
8.53 |
|
|
$ |
(3.46 |
) |
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
$ |
7.19 |
|
|
$ |
(2.28 |
) |
Weighted Average After Hedging |
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
|
$ |
(2.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Oil Price/Bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
72.78 |
|
|
$ |
56.19 |
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
West Coast |
|
$ |
70.32 |
|
|
$ |
48.01 |
|
|
$ |
22.31 |
|
Appalachia |
|
$ |
84.05 |
|
|
$ |
69.06 |
|
|
$ |
14.99 |
|
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
70.94 |
|
|
$ |
49.66 |
|
|
$ |
21.28 |
|
Weighted Average After Hedging |
|
$ |
74.53 |
|
|
$ |
64.34 |
|
|
$ |
10.19 |
|
-32-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (Cont.)
2009 Compared with 2008
Operating revenues for the Exploration and Production segment increased $9.6 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Oil
production revenue after hedging increased $9.6 million. An increase in the weighted average price
of oil after hedging ($10.19 per Bbl) was the primary cause, as production levels in the Gulf Coast
and West Coast regions were marginally higher in the current period. Gas production revenue was
relatively flat when comparing the quarter ended December 31, 2009 to the quarter ended December
31, 2008. Increases in Gulf Coast and Appalachian production were largely offset by price
decreases in those regions.
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 were
$29.8 million compared with a loss of $83.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, an
increase of $113.4 million. The increase in earnings is primarily the result of the non-recurrence
of an impairment charge of $108.2 million that was recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
as discussed above. Higher crude oil prices and marginally higher crude oil production increased
earnings by $5.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Lower lease operating expenses ($0.6
million) and lower interest expense ($0.6 million) also contributed to the increase in earnings.
The decrease in lease operating expenses is primarily due to lower production taxes related to the
lower production revenue from High Island 24 and 23 fields in the Gulf Coast region and lower well
operating costs related to High Island 356, which is in the process of being plugged. The decrease
in interest expense is primarily due to a lower average amount of debt outstanding. The increase
in earnings is partially offset by higher depletion expense ($0.5 million), lower interest income
($0.8 million), higher general and administrative and other operating expenses ($0.6 million), and
the earnings impact associated with higher income tax expense ($0.5 million). The increase in
depletion expense is primarily due to an increase in production partially offset by a lower full
cost pool balance after the impairment charge taken during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower temporary cash investment balances and
lower interest rates. The increase in general and administrative and other operating expenses is
mainly due to higher personnel costs.
Energy Marketing
Energy Marketing Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Natural Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
71,713 |
|
|
$ |
114,984 |
|
|
$ |
(43,271 |
) |
Other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,736 |
|
|
$ |
115,007 |
|
|
$ |
(43,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Marketing Volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
13,136 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Compared with 2008
Operating revenues for the Energy Marketing segment decreased $43.3 million for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The decrease is
largely attributable to lower gas sales revenue, due to a lower average price of natural gas that
was recovered through revenues. While volume sold increased, the majority of the increase was
attributable to sales transactions undertaken at the Niagara pipeline delivery point to offset
certain basis risks that the Energy Marketing segment was exposed to under certain fixed basis
commodity purchase contracts for Appalachian production. These offsetting transactions had the
effect of increasing revenue and volume sold with minimal impact to earnings.
-33-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Energy Marketing segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 were $1.1
million, an increase of $0.5 million when compared with earnings of $0.6 million for the quarter
ended December 31, 2008. Higher margin of $0.4 million was the primary reason for the increase.
The increase in margin was primarily driven by improved average margins per Mcf and lower pipeline
fuel costs due to lower natural gas commodity prices.
Corporate and All Other
2009 Compared with 2008
Corporate and All Other operations recorded earnings of $0.3 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, a decrease of $0.7 million when compared to the earnings of $1.0 million
recorded for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in earnings was largely due to the
non-recurrence of a gain resulting from a death benefit on corporate-owned life insurance policies
held by the Company ($2.3 million) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. In
addition, higher interest expense of $1.4 million (primarily the result of higher borrowings at a
higher interest rate due to the $250 million of 8.75% notes that were issued in April 2009) and
higher income tax expense of $1.2 million further reduced earnings. The decrease in earnings was
partially offset by higher margins from log and lumber sales ($1.9 million) and higher interest
income ($1.0 million) due to higher average temporary cash investment balances. In addition,
during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, ESNE, an unconsolidated subsidiary of Horizon Power,
recorded an impairment charge of $3.6 million which did not recur. Horizon Powers 50% share of
the impairment was $1.8 million ($1.1 million on an after tax basis).
Interest Income
Interest income was $0.7 million lower in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as compared to
the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Lower cash investment balances in the Exploration and
Production segment and lower interest rates on such investments were the primary factors
contributing to the decrease.
Other Income
Other Income decreased $4.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as compared with
the quarter ended December 31, 2008. This decrease is attributed to a $2.7 million decrease in the
allowance for funds used during construction in the Pipeline and Storage segment mainly associated
with the Empire Connector project. In addition, a gain resulting from a death benefit on
corporate-owned life insurance policies of $2.3 million recognized during the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 did not recur.
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt
Interest on long-term debt increased $4.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as
compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2008. This increase is primarily the result of a
higher average amount of long-term debt outstanding combined with higher average interest rates.
In April 2009, the Company issued $250 million of 8.75% senior, unsecured notes due in May 2019.
This increase was partially offset by the repayment of $100 million of 6.0% medium-term notes that
matured in March 2009.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Companys primary source of cash during the three-month periods ended December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 consisted of cash provided by operating activities. This source of cash was
supplemented by issues of new shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises. During
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, short-term borrowings also supplemented the Companys cash
position. During the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the common stock
used to fulfill the requirements of the Companys 401(k) plans and Direct Stock Purchase and
Dividend Reinvestment Plan was obtained via open market purchases.
-34-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income available for
common stock, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income and changes in operating assets and
liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairment of oil and
gas producing properties, impairment of investment in partnership, deferred income taxes, and
income or loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries net of cash distributions.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Utility and Pipeline and Storage segments may
vary substantially from period to period because of the impact of rate cases. In the Utility
segment, supplier refunds, over- or under-recovered purchased gas costs and weather may also
significantly impact cash flow. The impact of weather on cash flow is tempered in the Utility
segments New York rate jurisdiction by its WNC and in the Pipeline and Storage segment by the
straight fixed-variable rate design used by Supply Corporation and Empire.
Because of the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, revenues in these segments are relatively high during the heating season, primarily the
first and second quarters of the fiscal year, and receivable balances historically increase during
these periods from the receivable balances at September 30.
The storage gas inventory normally declines during the first and second quarters of the fiscal
year and is replenished during the third and fourth quarters. For storage gas inventory accounted
for under the LIFO method, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage is recorded in
the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities. Such
reserve is reduced as the inventory is replenished.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Exploration and Production segment may vary from
period to period as a result of changes in the commodity prices of natural gas and crude oil. The
Company uses various derivative financial instruments, including price swap agreements and futures
contracts in an attempt to manage this energy commodity price risk.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $68.3 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, a decrease of $31.8 million when compared with the $100.1 million provided by
operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2008. In the Exploration and
Production segment, cash provided by operations decreased due to lower cash receipts from the sale
of oil and gas production. In the Pipeline and Storage segment, cash provided by operations
decreased due to lower cash receipts from the sale of efficiency gas inventory. From a
consolidated perspective, higher interest payments on long-term debt and higher contributions to
the Companys tax-qualified, noncontributory defined-benefit retirement plan (Retirement Plan) also
contributed to the decrease in cash provided by operating activities.
Investing Cash Flow
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
The Companys expenditures for long-lived assets totaled $67.8 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and $119.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The table
below presents these expenditures:
-35-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Total Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
(Millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Utility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Pipeline and Storage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
(3) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Exploration and Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
47.7 |
(1) (2) |
|
|
86.4 |
(4) |
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
All Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
1.0 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Investment in Partnership |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) (5) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67.8 |
|
|
$ |
119.2 |
|
|
$ |
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount includes $15.4 million of accrued capital expenditures at December 31,
2009, the majority of which was in the Appalachian region. This amount has been excluded from the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at December 31, 2009 since it represents a non-cash investing
activity at that date. |
|
(2) |
|
Capital expenditures for the Exploration and Production segment for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 exclude $9.1 million of capital expenditures, the majority of
which was in the Appalachian region. Capital expenditures for All Other for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 exclude $0.7 million of capital expenditures related to the construction of the
Midstream Covington Gathering System. Both of these amounts were accrued at September 30, 2009 and
paid during the three months ended December 31, 2009. These amounts were excluded from the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at September 30, 2009 since they represented non-cash
investing activities at that date. These amounts have been included in the Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows at December 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount for the three months ended December 31, 2008 excludes $16.8 million
of capital expenditures related to the Empire Connector project accrued at September 30, 2008 and
paid during the three months ended December 31, 2008. This amount was excluded from the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at September 30, 2008 since it represented a non-cash
investing activity at that date. The amount has been included in the Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows at December 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Amount includes $51.7 million of accrued capital expenditures at December
31, 2008, the majority of which was for lease acquisitions in the Appalachian region. This amount
has been excluded from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at December 31, 2008 since it
represents a non-cash investing activity at that date. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents $0.3 million of capital expenditures in the Pipeline and Storage
segment for the purchase of pipeline facilities from the Appalachian region of the Exploration and
Production segment during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
Utility
The majority of the Utility capital expenditures for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 were made for replacement of mains and main extensions, as well as for the
replacement of service lines.
Pipeline and Storage
The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 were related to additions, improvements, and replacements to this segments
transmission and gas storage systems. The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures
for the three months ended December 31, 2008 were related to the Empire Connector project, which
was placed into service on December 10, 2008.
-36-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
In light of the growing demand for pipeline capacity to move natural gas from new wells being
drilled in Appalachia specifically in the Marcellus Shale producing area Supply Corporation
and Empire are actively pursuing several expansion projects. Supply Corporation is moving forward
with two strategic compressor horsepower expansions, both supported by signed precedent agreements
with Appalachian producers, designed to move anticipated Marcellus production gas to markets beyond
Supply Corporations pipeline system.
The first strategic horsepower expansion project involves new compression along Supply
Corporations Line N, increasing that lines capacity into Texas Easterns Holbrook Station in
southwestern Pennsylvania (Line N Expansion Project). This project is designed and contracted for
150,000 Dth/day of firm transportation, and will allow anticipated Marcellus production located in
the vicinity of Line N to flow south and access markets off Texas Easterns system, with a
projected in-service date of November 2011. On October 20, 2009, Supply Corporation entered the
FERC National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Pre-filing review, and is in the process of preparing
an NGA Section 7(c) application to the FERC for approval of the Line N Expansion Project. The
preliminary cost estimate for the Line N Expansion Project is $23 million. As of December 31, 2009,
approximately $0.6 million has been spent to study the Line N Expansion Project, which has been
included in preliminary survey and investigation charges and has been fully reserved for at
December 31, 2009.
The second strategic horsepower expansion project involves the addition of compression at
Supply Corporations existing interconnect with Tennessee Gas Pipeline at Lamont, Pennsylvania,
with a projected in-service date of June 2010 (Lamont Project). The Lamont Project is designed
and contracted for 40,000 Dth/day of firm transportation and will afford shippers a transportation
path from their anticipated Marcellus production located in Elk and Cameron Counties, Pennsylvania
to markets attached to Tennessee Gas Pipelines 300 Line. The Lamont Project will be constructed
under Supply Corporations existing blanket construction certificate authority from the FERC. The
preliminary cost estimate for the Lamont Project is $6 million. As of December 31, 2009, less than
$0.1 million has been spent to study the Lamont Project, which has been included in preliminary
survey and investigation charges and has been fully reserved for at December 31, 2009.
In addition, Supply Corporation continues to actively pursue its largest planned expansion,
the West-to-East (W2E) pipeline project, which is designed to transport Rockies and/or locally
produced natural gas supplies to the Ellisburg/Leidy/Corning area. Supply Corporation anticipates
that the development of the W2E project will occur in phases, and based on requests from the
Marcellus producing community for transportation service commencing as early as 2011, Supply
Corporation began a binding Open Season on August 26, 2009. This Open Season offered transportation
capacity on two initial phases (Phase I and Phase II) of the W2E pipeline project. As currently
envisioned, constructed in 2 phases, Phase I would be designed to transport approximately 100,000
Dth/day from the Marcellus producing area through a new 39-mile pipeline to be constructed through
Elk, Cameron, and Clinton Counties to the Leidy Hub, with an anticipated in-service date of late
2011. Phase II, with a late 2012 projected in-service date, consists of an additional 43 miles of
new pipeline extending through Clearfield and Jefferson Counties to Supply Corporations Line K
system and would provide additional transportation capacity of at least 325,000 Dth/day. The
project also includes 25,000 horsepower of compression at two stations located along the new
pipeline.
This binding Open Season concluded on October 8, 2009 with significant participation by
Marcellus producers. Supply Corporation received binding requests for 175,000 Dth/day of firm
transportation capacity, has fully executed precedent agreements for
100,000 Dth/day, and expects to execute the remaining agreements submitted by those
shippers. Supply Corporation is pursuing post-Open Season capacity requests for the remaining Phase
I and Phase II capacity. Preliminary engineering, alternate routing analysis, preliminary cost
estimate and rate design have been completed. This project will require an NGA Section 7(c)
application, which Supply Corporation has not filed. The capital cost of these two phases is
estimated to be $260 million. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $1.0 million has been spent
to study the W2E Phase I and II transportation project, which has been included in preliminary
survey and investigation charges and has been fully reserved for at December 31, 2009.
-37-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
In conjunction with Phases I and II of the W2E transportation project, Supply Corporation
plans to develop new storage capacity by expanding two of its existing storage facilities. The
expansion of the East Branch and Galbraith fields, which could be completed in early 2013, provides
7.9 MMDth of incremental storage capacity and approximately 88 MDth per day of additional
withdrawal deliverability. Supply Corporation expects that the availability of this incremental
storage capacity will complement Phases I and II of the W2E pipeline project by providing
incremental transportation throughput to and from key market interconnect points. It will also
serve to balance the increasing flow of Appalachian gas supply through the western Pennsylvania
area with the growing demand for gas on the East Coast. This storage expansion project will
require an NGA Section 7 (c) application, which Supply Corporation has not yet filed. The
preliminary cost estimate for this storage expansion project is $64 million. As of December 31,
2009, approximately $1.0 million has been spent to study this storage expansion project, which has
been included in preliminary survey and investigation charges and has been fully reserved for at
December 31, 2009. The specific timeline associated with the storage expansion will depend on
market development.
Supply Corporation expects that its previously announced Appalachian Lateral project will
complement W2E Phases I and II due to its strategic upstream location. The Appalachian Lateral
pipeline, which is routed through several counties in central Pennsylvania where producers are
actively drilling and seeking market access for their newly discovered reserves, will be able to
collect and transport locally produced Marcellus shale gas to Supply Corporations Line K corridor
and subsequently through the W2E Phase I and II facilities.
Supply Corporation has closed the Appalachian Lateral Open Season and the original Rockies
supply-driven W2E Open Season, while it focuses on development of the W2E Phase I and II project.
Supply Corporation expects to continue marketing efforts for all remaining sections of the
W2E/Appalachian Lateral project. The timeline associated with sections other than W2E Phases I and
II will depend on market development.
On October 1, 2009, Empire commenced the Open Season process for an expansion project that
will provide at least 300,000 Dth/day of incremental firm transportation capacity from anticipated
Marcellus production at new and existing interconnection(s) along its recently completed Empire
Connector line and along a proposed 16-mile 24 pipeline extension into Tioga County, Pennsylvania.
Empires preliminary cost estimate for the Tioga County Extension Project is approximately $45
million. This project would enable shippers to deliver their gas at existing Empire
interconnections with Millennium Pipeline at Corning, New York, with TransCanada Pipeline at
Chippawa, and with utility and power generation markets along its path, as well as to a planned new
interconnection with Tennessee Gas Pipelines 200 Line (Zone 5) in Ontario County, New York. Empire
completed the non-binding Open Season process on November 25, 2009 for capacity in the Tioga County
Extension Project, and has executed a binding precedent agreement with its anchor shipper for
200,000 Dth/day. Empire is in the process of finalizing binding precedent agreements with other
shippers who participated in the Open Season, representing requests for at least an additional
100,000 Dth/day. On January 28, 2010, Empire entered the FERC NEPA Pre-filing review, and is in the
process of preparing a NGA Section 7 (c) application it anticipates filing with the FERC for
approval of the Tioga County Extension project. Empire anticipates that these facilities will be
placed in-service on or after September 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $0.2
million has been spent to study the Tioga County Extension Project, which has been included in
preliminary survey and investigation charges and has been fully reserved for at December 31, 2009.
The Company anticipates financing the Line N Expansion Project, the Lamont Project, Phase I
and Phase II of the W2E/Appalachian Lateral project, the storage expansion project, and the Tioga
County Extension Project, all of which are discussed above, with a combination of cash from
operations, short-term debt, and long-term debt.
Exploration and Production
The Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 were primarily well drilling and completion expenditures and included
approximately $1.3 million for the Gulf Coast region, $7.4 million for the West Coast region and
$39.0 million for the Appalachian region. These amounts included approximately $12.8 million spent
to develop proved undeveloped reserves.
-38-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 were primarily well drilling and completion expenditures and included
approximately $11.9 million for the Gulf Coast region, substantially all of which was for the
off-shore program in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico, $10.4 million for the West Coast
region and $64.1 million for the Appalachian region. These amounts included approximately $10.2
million spent to develop proved undeveloped reserves.
For all of 2010, the Company expects to spend $345 million on Exploration and Production
segment capital expenditures. Previously reported 2010 estimated capital expenditures for the
Exploration and Production segment were $255 million. Estimated capital expenditures in the Gulf
Coast region will increase from $14.0 million to $18.0 million. Estimated capital expenditures in
the West Coast region will increase from $17.0 million to $27.0 million. In the Appalachian
region, estimated capital expenditures will increase from $224.0 million to $300.0 million. The
increase in estimated capital expenditures in the Appalachian region is primarily due to the
Companys planned acquisition of two tracts of land in the Appalachian region. The Companys
wholly-owned subsidiary, Seneca, was the high bidder on these two tracts of land at approximately
$71.8 million. The transaction is expected to close on March 12, 2010. The Company anticipates
funding this transaction with cash from operations and/or short-term borrowings. The Companys
estimate of drilling 55 to 75 gross wells in the Marcellus Shale during 2010 remains unchanged.
For fiscal 2011, the Company expects to spend $488 million on Exploration and Production
segment capital expenditures. Previously reported fiscal 2011 estimated capital expenditures for
the Exploration and Production segment were $417 million. Estimated capital expenditures in the
Gulf Coast region will increase from $5.0 million to $10.0 million. Estimated capital expenditures
in the West Coast region will increase from $27.0 million to $28.0 million. In the Appalachian
region, estimated capital expenditures will increase from $385.0 million to $450.0 million. The
Companys estimate of drilling 100 to 130 gross wells in the
Marcellus Shale during 2011 remains unchanged.
For fiscal 2012, the Company expects to spend $625 million on Exploration and Production
segment capital expenditures. Previously reported fiscal 2012 estimated capital expenditures for
the Exploration and Production segment were $497 million. Estimated capital expenditures in the
Gulf Coast region will increase from $12.0 million to $19.0 million. In the Appalachian region,
estimated capital expenditures will increase from $444.0 million to $565.0 million. Estimated
capital expenditures in the West Coast region will remain at the previously reported $41.0 million.
The Company had previously reported that it anticipates drilling 120 to 150 gross wells in the
Marcellus Shale during 2012. The Company now anticipates drilling 130 to 160 gross wells in the
Marcellus Shale during 2012.
All Other
The majority of the All Other categorys capital expenditures for long-lived assets for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 were for the construction of Midstream Corporations Covington
Gathering System, as discussed below. Expenditures for long-lived assets for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 also included a $0.1 million capital contribution made by NFG Midstream
Processing, LLC to Whitetail Processing Plant, LLC, as discussed below.
NFG Midstream Covington, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Midstream Corporation, is
constructing a gathering system in Tioga County, Pennsylvania. The project, called the Covington
Gathering System, is being constructed in two phases. The first phase was completed and placed in
service in November 2009. The second phase is anticipated to be placed in service in June 2010.
When completed, the system will consist of approximately 15 miles of gathering system at a cost of
$15 million to $18 million. As of December 31, 2009, Midstream Corporation has spent approximately
$8.9 million in costs related to this project.
-39-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
NFG Midstream Processing, LLC, another wholly owned subsidiary of Midstream Corporation, has a
35% ownership in Whitetail Processing Plant, LLC. The plant was placed into service in November
2009. The plant extracts natural gas liquids from local production. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company invested $1.4 million related to the construction of the plant.
The Company anticipates funding the Midstream Corporation projects with cash from operations
and/or short-term borrowings.
The Company continuously evaluates capital expenditures and investments in corporations,
partnerships, and other business entities. The amounts are subject to modification for
opportunities such as the acquisition of attractive oil and gas properties, timber or natural gas
storage facilities and the expansion of natural gas transmission line capacities. While the
majority of capital expenditures in the Utility segment are necessitated by the continued need for
replacement and upgrading of mains and service lines, the magnitude of future capital expenditures
or other investments in the Companys other business segments depends, to a large degree, upon
market conditions.
Financing Cash Flow
The Company did not have any outstanding short-term notes payable to banks or commercial paper
at December 31, 2009. However, the Company continues to consider short-term debt (consisting of
short-term notes payable to banks and commercial paper) an important source of cash for temporarily
financing capital expenditures and investments in corporations and/or partnerships, gas-in-storage
inventory, unrecovered purchased gas costs, margin calls on derivative financial instruments,
exploration and development expenditures, repurchases of stock, and other working capital needs.
Fluctuations in these items can have a significant impact on the amount and timing of short-term
debt. As for bank loans, the Company maintains a number of individual uncommitted or discretionary
lines of credit with certain financial institutions for general corporate purposes. Borrowings
under these lines of credit are made at competitive market rates. These credit lines, which
aggregate to $420.0 million, are revocable at the option of the financial institutions and are
reviewed on an annual basis. The Company anticipates that these lines of credit will continue to be
renewed, or replaced by similar lines. The total amount available to be issued under the Companys
commercial paper program is $300.0 million. The commercial paper program is backed by a syndicated
committed credit facility totaling $300.0 million that extends through September 30, 2010.
Under the Companys committed credit facility, the Company has agreed that its debt to
capitalization ratio will not exceed .65 at the last day of any fiscal quarter through September
30, 2010. At December 31, 2009, the Companys debt to capitalization ratio (as calculated under the
facility) was .43. The constraints specified in the committed credit facility would permit an
additional $1.78 billion in short-term and/or long-term debt to be outstanding (further limited by
the indenture covenants discussed below) before the Companys debt to capitalization ratio would
exceed .65. If a downgrade in any of the Companys credit ratings were to occur, access to the
commercial paper markets might not be possible. However, the Company expects that it could borrow
under its committed credit facility, uncommitted bank lines of credit or rely upon other liquidity
sources, including cash provided by operations. At December 31, 2009, the Companys long-term debt
ratings were: BBB (S&P), Baa1 (Moodys Investor Service), and A- (Fitch Ratings Service). At
December 31, 2009, the Companys commercial paper ratings were: A-2 (S&P), P-2 (Moodys Investor
Service), and F2 (Fitch Ratings Service).
Under the Companys existing indenture covenants, at December 31, 2009, the Company would have
been permitted to issue up to a maximum of $1.18 billion in additional long-term unsecured
indebtedness at then current market interest rates in addition to being able to issue new
indebtedness to replace maturing debt. The Companys present liquidity position is believed to be
adequate to satisfy known demands. However, if the Company were to experience another impairment of
oil and gas properties in the future, it is possible that these indenture covenants would restrict
the Companys ability to issue additional long-term unsecured indebtedness. This would not preclude
the Company from issuing new indebtedness to replace maturing debt.
-40-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Companys 1974 indenture, pursuant to which $99.0 million (or 7.9%) of the Companys
long-term debt (as of December 31, 2009) was issued, contains a cross-default provision whereby the
failure by the Company to perform certain obligations under other borrowing arrangements could
trigger an obligation to repay the debt outstanding under the indenture. In particular, a repayment
obligation could be triggered if the Company fails (i) to pay any scheduled principal or interest
on any debt under any other indenture or agreement, or (ii) to perform any other term in any other
such indenture or agreement, and the effect of the failure causes, or would permit the holders of
the debt to cause, the debt under such indenture or agreement to become due prior to its stated
maturity, unless cured or waived.
The Companys $300.0 million committed credit facility also contains a cross-default provision
whereby the failure by the Company or its significant subsidiaries to make payments under other
borrowing arrangements, or the occurrence of certain events affecting those other borrowing
arrangements, could trigger an obligation to repay any amounts outstanding under the committed
credit facility. In particular, a repayment obligation could be triggered if (i) the Company or any
of its significant subsidiaries fail to make a payment when due of any principal or interest on any
other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more, or (ii) an event occurs that causes, or would
permit the holders of any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more to cause, such
indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had
no debt outstanding under the committed credit facility.
The Companys embedded cost of long-term debt was 6.95% at December 31, 2009 and 6.5% at
December 31, 2008. If the Company were to issue long-term debt today, its borrowing costs might be
expected to be in the range of 5.5% to 6.5% depending on the maturity date.
The Company may issue debt or equity securities in a public offering or a private placement
from time to time. The amounts and timing of the issuance and sale of debt or equity securities
will depend on market conditions, indenture requirements, regulatory authorizations and the capital
requirements of the Company.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has entered into certain off-balance sheet financing arrangements. These financing
arrangements are primarily operating leases. The Companys consolidated subsidiaries have operating
leases, the majority of which are with the Utility and the Pipeline and Storage segments, having a
remaining lease commitment of approximately $25.6 million. These leases have been entered into for
the use of buildings, vehicles, construction tools, meters and other items and are accounted for as
operating leases.
OTHER MATTERS
In addition to the legal proceedings disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of this report, the Company
is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business.
These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other
governmental audits, inspections, investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve
state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service and
purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters could have a
material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which they are
resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor
are they expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company contributed $20.2 million to its
Retirement Plan and $6.2 million to its VEBA trusts and 401(h) accounts for its other
post-retirement benefits. In the remainder of 2010, the Company does not expect to contribute to
the Retirement Plan. It is likely that the Company will have to fund larger amounts to the
Retirement Plan subsequent to fiscal 2010 in order to be in compliance with the Pension Protection
Act of 2006. In the remainder of 2010, the Company expects to contribute in the range of $19.0
million to $20.0 million to its VEBA trusts and 401(h) accounts.
-41-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, the Company has
identified certain inputs used to recognize fair value as Level 3 (unobservable inputs). The Level
3 derivative assets relate to oil swap agreements used to hedge forecasted sales at a specific
location (southern California). The Companys internal model that is used to calculate fair value
applies a historical basis differential (between the sales locations and NYMEX) to a forward NYMEX
curve because there is not a forward curve specific to this sales location. Given the high level of
historical correlation between NYMEX prices and prices at this sales location, the Company does not
believe that the fair value recorded by the Company would be significantly different from what it
expects to receive upon settlement.
The Company uses the crude oil swaps classified as Level 3 to hedge against the risk of
declining commodity prices and not as speculative investments. Gains or losses related to these
Level 3 derivative assets (including any reduction for credit risk) are deferred until the hedged
commodity transaction occurs in accordance with the provisions of the existing guidance for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. The value of the swaps represented a $0.1 million
reduction to Derivative Financial Instruments Assets or 0.03% of Total Assets as shown in Part I,
Item 1 at Note 2 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009.
The decrease in the net fair value of the Level 3 positions from October 1, 2009 to December
31, 2009, as shown in Part I, Item 1 at Note 2, was attributable to an increase in the commodity
price of crude oil during that period. The Company believes that these fair values reasonably
represent the amounts that the Company would realize upon settlement based on commodity prices that
were present at December 31, 2009.
The fair value of all the Companys Derivative Financial Instruments Assets was reduced by
$0.2 million based on the Companys assessment of credit risk. The Company applied default
probabilities to the anticipated cash flows that it was expecting from its counterparties to
calculate the credit reserve.
For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to Market Risk
Sensitive Instruments in Item 7 of the Companys 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent
material changes to the Companys exposure to market risk sensitive instruments.
Rate and Regulatory Matters
Utility Operation
Base rate adjustments in both the New York and Pennsylvania jurisdictions do not reflect the
recovery of purchased gas costs. Such costs are recovered through operation of the purchased gas
adjustment clauses of the appropriate regulatory authorities.
New York Jurisdiction
Customer delivery rates charged by Distribution Corporations New York division were
established in a rate order issued on December 21, 2007 by the NYPSC. The rate order approved a
revenue increase of $1.8 million annually, together with a surcharge that would collect up to $10.8
million to recover expenses for implementation of an efficiency and conservation incentive program.
The rate order further provided for a return on equity of 9.1%. In connection with the efficiency
and conservation program, the rate order adopted Distribution Corporations proposed revenue
decoupling mechanism. The revenue decoupling mechanism, like others, decouples revenues from
throughput by enabling the Company to collect from small volume customers its allowed margin on
average weather normalized usage per customer. The effect of the revenue decoupling mechanism is to
render the Company financially indifferent to throughput decreases resulting from conservation. The
Company surcharges or credits any difference from the average weather normalized usage per customer
account. The surcharge or credit is calculated to recover total margin for the most recent
twelve-month period ending December 31, and is applied to customer bills annually, beginning March
1st.
-42-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
On April 18, 2008, Distribution Corporation filed an appeal with Supreme Court, Albany County,
seeking review of the rate order. The appeal contended that portions of the rate order were invalid
because they failed to meet the applicable legal standard for agency decisions. Among the issues
challenged by the Company were the reasonableness of the NYPSCs disallowance of expense items and
the methodology used for calculating rate of return, which the appeal contended understated the
Companys cost of equity. Because of the issues appealed, the case was later transferred to the
Appellate Division, New York States second-highest court. On December 31, 2009, the Appellate
Division issued its Opinion and Judgment. The court upheld the NYPSCs determination relating to
the authorized rate of return but also supported the Companys argument that the NYPSC improperly
disallowed recovery of certain environmental clean-up costs. The court remanded that issue to the
NYPSC for further proceedings consistent with its decision. The remand proceedings have not yet
been initiated by the NYPSC. On February 1, 2010, the NYPSC filed a motion for permission to Appeal
to the Court of Appeals, New York States highest court, seeking appeal of the Appellate Divisions
annulment of that part of the rate order relating to disallowance of certain environmental clean up
costs. If the NYPSCs motion is granted, the matter will be heard by the Court of Appeals.
Distribution Corporation intends to oppose the NYPSCs motion. The Company cannot ascertain the
outcome of the appeal proceedings at this time.
Pennsylvania Jurisdiction
Distribution Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file with the PaPUC.
Distribution Corporations current tariff in its Pennsylvania jurisdiction was last approved by the
PaPUC on November 30, 2006 as part of a settlement agreement that became effective January 1, 2007.
Pipeline and Storage
Supply Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file with the FERC. The rate
settlement approved by the FERC on February 9, 2007 requires Supply Corporation to make a general
rate filing to be effective December 1, 2011, and bars Supply Corporation from making a general
rate filing before then, with some exceptions specified in the settlement.
Empires new facilities (the Empire Connector project) were placed into service on December
10, 2008. As of that date, Empire became an interstate pipeline subject to FERC regulation,
performing services under a FERC-approved tariff and at FERC-approved rates. The December 21, 2006
FERC order issuing Empire its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity requires Empire to
file a cost and revenue study at the FERC, within three years after the in-service date, in
conjunction with which Empire will either justify Empires existing recourse rates or propose
alternative rates.
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to
the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures for the ongoing
evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and comply with
regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated environmental
clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be estimated and it
is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
The Company has agreed with the NYDEC to remediate a former manufactured gas plant site
located in New York. The Company has received approval from the NYDEC of a Remedial Design work
plan for this site and has recorded an estimated minimum liability for remediation of this site of
$15.2 million.
At December 31, 2009, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $18.1 million to $22.3
million. The minimum estimated liability of $18.1 million, which includes the $15.2 million
discussed above, has been recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009. The
Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up costs from a combination of rate recovery and
deferred insurance proceeds that are currently recorded as a regulatory liability on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
-43-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are
in various phases of discussions. If enacted or adopted, legislation or regulation that restricts
carbon emissions could increase the Companys cost of environmental compliance by requiring the
Company to install new equipment to reduce emissions from larger facilities and/or purchase
emission allowances. Proposed measures could also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to
obtain permits and other regulatory approvals with regard to existing and new facilities. But
legislation or regulation that sets a price on or otherwise restricts carbon emissions could also
benefit the Company by increasing demand for natural gas, because substantially fewer carbon
emissions per Btu of heat generated are associated with the use of natural gas than with certain
alternate fuels such as coal and oil. The effect (material or not) on the Company of any new
legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately
adopted.
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely impact
the Company.
New Authoritative Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance
In September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for using fair value to measure
assets and liabilities. This guidance serves to clarify the extent to which companies measure
assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect
that fair-value measurements have on earnings. This guidance is to be applied whenever assets or
liabilities are to be measured at fair value. On October 1, 2008, the Company adopted this guidance
for financial assets and financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis. The FASBs authoritative guidance for using fair value to measure nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities on a nonrecurring basis became effective during the quarter
ended December 31, 2009. The Companys nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities were not
impacted by this guidance during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The Company has identified
Goodwill as being the major nonfinancial asset that may be impacted by the adoption of this
guidance. The impact of this guidance will be known when the Company performs its annual test for
goodwill impairment at the end of the fiscal year; however, at this time, it is not expected to be
material. The Company has identified Asset Retirement Obligations as a nonfinancial liability that
may be impacted by the adoption of the guidance. The impact of this guidance will be known when
the Company recognizes new asset retirement obligations. However, at this time, the Company
believes the impact of the guidance will be immaterial.
In December 2007, the FASB revised authoritative guidance that significantly changes the
accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent
consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in process research and development and
restructuring costs. In addition, under this guidance, changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement
period will impact income tax expense. This authoritative guidance became effective for the Company
as of October 1, 2009. The Company will apply this guidance to future business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that changes the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests (NCI)
and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changed the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. This authoritative guidance became
effective for the Company as of October 1, 2009. This guidance currently does not have an impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance concerning whether certain instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance specified
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. The two class method allocates undistributed earnings between common
shares and participating securities. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 and determined that its participating securities (restricted stock awards) have an
immaterial impact on the Companys earnings per share calculation. Therefore, the Company has not
presented its earnings per share pursuant to the two class method.
-44-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued a final rule on Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting.
The final rule modifies the SECs reporting and disclosure rules for oil and gas reserves and
aligns the full cost accounting rules with the revised disclosures. The most notable changes of the
final rule include the replacement of the single day period-end pricing to value oil and gas
reserves to a 12-month average of the first day of the month price for each month within the
reporting period. The final rule also permits voluntary disclosure of probable and possible
reserves, a disclosure previously prohibited by SEC rules. Additionally, on January 6, 2010, the
FASB amended the oil and gas accounting standards to conform to the SEC final rule on Modernization
of Oil and Gas Reporting. The revised reporting and disclosure requirements are effective for the
Companys Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of these rules will have on its
consolidated financial statements and MD&A disclosures.
In March 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that expands the disclosures required in
an employers financial statements about pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assets. The
additional disclosures include more details on how investment allocation decisions are made, the
plans investment policies and strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period, and
disclosure regarding significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The additional
disclosure requirements are required for the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this authoritative guidance
will have on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued amended authoritative guidance to improve and clarify financial
reporting requirements by companies involved with variable interest entities. The new guidance
requires a company to perform an analysis to determine whether the companys variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The analysis also
assists in identifying the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This authoritative
guidance is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that adoption of this authoritative guidance will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this Form 10-Q to make
applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company.
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, projections,
strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are
other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise
make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such subsequent forward-looking
statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are also
expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Certain statements contained in this report,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future prospects, plans, objectives, goals,
projections, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions, capital
structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion of construction projects, projections for
pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, impacts of the adoption of new accounting
rules, and possible outcomes of litigation or regulatory proceedings, as well as statements that
are identified by the use of the words anticipates, estimates, expects, forecasts,
intends, plans, predicts, projects, believes, seeks, will, may, and similar
expressions, are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are based on various assumptions, many of which are
based, in turn, upon further assumptions. The Companys expectations, beliefs and projections are
expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable basis, including,
without limitation, managements examination of historical operating trends, data contained in the
Companys records and other data available from third parties, but there can
-45-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
be no assurance that managements expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved
or accomplished. In addition to other factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, the following
are important factors that, in the view of the Company, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
|
1. |
|
Financial and economic conditions, including the availability of credit, and their effect on
the Companys ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms for working capital, capital
expenditures and other investments; |
|
|
2. |
|
Occurrences affecting the Companys ability to obtain financing under credit lines or other
credit facilities or through the issuance of commercial paper, other short-term notes or debt
or equity securities, including any downgrades in the Companys credit ratings and changes in
interest rates and other capital market conditions; |
|
|
3. |
|
Changes in economic conditions, including global, national or regional recessions, and their
effect on the demand for, and customers ability to pay for, the Companys products and
services; |
|
|
4. |
|
The creditworthiness or performance of the Companys key suppliers, customers and
counterparties; |
|
|
5. |
|
Economic disruptions or uninsured losses resulting from terrorist activities, acts of war,
major accidents, fires, hurricanes, other severe weather, pest infestation or other natural
disasters; |
|
|
6. |
|
Changes in demographic patterns and weather conditions; |
|
|
7. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of natural gas or oil and the effect of such changes
on the accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments or the valuation of the
Companys natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
|
8. |
|
Impairments under the SECs full cost ceiling test for natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
|
9. |
|
Uncertainty of oil and gas reserve estimates; |
|
|
10. |
|
Factors affecting the Companys ability to successfully identify, drill for and produce
economically viable natural gas and oil reserves, including among others geology, lease
availability, weather conditions, shortages, delays or unavailability of equipment and
services required in drilling operations, insufficient gathering, processing and
transportation capacity, and the need to obtain governmental approvals and permits and comply
with environmental laws and regulations; |
|
|
11. |
|
Significant differences between the Companys projected and actual production levels for
natural gas or oil; |
|
|
12. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of derivative financial instruments; |
|
|
13. |
|
Changes in the price differentials between oil having different quality and/or different
geographic locations, or changes in the price differentials between natural gas having
different heating values and/or different geographic locations; |
|
|
14. |
|
Changes in laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including those involving
taxes, safety, employment, climate change, other environmental matters, and exploration and
production activities such as hydraulic fracturing; |
|
|
15. |
|
The nature and projected profitability of pending and potential projects and other
investments, and the ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals and permits; |
|
|
16. |
|
Significant differences between the Companys projected and actual capital expenditures and
operating expenses, and unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs or plans; |
-46-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Concl.)
|
17. |
|
Inability to obtain new customers or retain existing ones; |
|
|
18. |
|
Significant changes in competitive factors affecting the Company; |
|
|
19. |
|
Governmental/regulatory actions, initiatives and proceedings, including those involving
acquisitions, financings, rate cases (which address, among other things, allowed rates of
return, rate design and retained natural gas), affiliate relationships, industry structure,
franchise renewal, and environmental/safety requirements; |
|
|
20. |
|
Unanticipated impacts of restructuring initiatives in the natural gas and electric
industries; |
|
|
21. |
|
Ability to successfully identify and finance acquisitions or other investments and ability to
operate and integrate existing and any subsequently acquired business or properties; |
|
|
22. |
|
Changes in actuarial assumptions, the interest rate environment and the return on plan/trust
assets related to the Companys pension and other post-retirement benefits, which can affect
future funding obligations and costs and plan liabilities; |
|
|
23. |
|
Significant changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation or interest; |
|
|
24. |
|
Significant changes in the Companys relationship with its employees or contractors and the
potential adverse effects if labor disputes, grievances or shortages were to occur; |
|
|
25. |
|
Changes in accounting principles or the application of such principles to the Company; |
|
|
26. |
|
The cost and effects of legal and administrative claims against the Company or activist
shareholder campaigns to effect changes at the Company; |
|
|
27. |
|
Increasing health care costs and the resulting effect on health insurance premiums and on the
obligation to provide other post-retirement benefits; or |
|
|
28. |
|
Increasing costs of insurance, changes in coverage and the ability to obtain insurance. |
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to the Market Risk Sensitive Instruments section in Item 2 MD&A.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009.
-47-
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Concl.)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a discussion of various environmental and other matters, refer to Part I, Item 1 at Note 6
Commitments and Contingencies, and Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading
Other Matters Environmental Matters.
In addition to these matters, the Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory
matters arising in the normal course of business. These other matters may include, for example,
negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections, investigations or
other proceedings. These matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with
regulations, rate base, cost of service, and purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While
these normal-course matters could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows in the
quarterly and annual period in which they are resolved, they are not expected to change materially
the Companys present liquidity position, nor are they expected to have a material adverse effect
on the financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors in Item 1A of the Companys 2009 Form 10-K have not materially changed other
than as set forth below. The first two risk factors presented below supersede the risk factors
having the same captions in the 2009 Form 10-K; the third risk factor supplements the risk factors
in the 2009 Form 10-K. Each risk factor should otherwise be read in conjunction with all of the
risk factors disclosed in the 2009 Form 10-K.
The amount and timing of actual future oil and natural gas production and the cost of drilling are
difficult to predict and may vary significantly from reserves and production estimates, which may
reduce the Companys earnings.
There are many risks in developing oil and natural gas, including numerous uncertainties
inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future
rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The future success of the Companys
Exploration and Production segment depends on its ability to develop additional oil and natural gas
reserves that are economically recoverable, and its failure to do so may reduce the Companys
earnings. The total and timing of actual future production may vary significantly from reserves and
production estimates. The Companys drilling of development wells can involve significant risks,
including those related to timing, success rates, and cost overruns, and these risks can be
affected by lease and rig availability, geology, and other factors. Drilling for oil and natural
gas can be unprofitable, not only from non-productive wells, but from productive wells that do not
produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. Also, title problems, weather conditions,
governmental requirements, including completion of environmental impact analyses and compliance
with other environmental laws and regulations, and shortages or delays in the delivery of equipment
and services can delay drilling operations or result in their cancellation. The cost of drilling,
completing, and operating wells is often uncertain, and new wells may not be productive or the
Company may not recover all or any portion of its investment. Production can also be delayed or
made uneconomic if there is insufficient gathering, processing and transportation capacity
available at an economic price to get that production to a location where it can be profitably
sold. Without continued successful exploitation or acquisition activities, the Companys reserves
and revenues will decline as a result of its current reserves being depleted by production. The
Company cannot assure you that it will be able to find or acquire additional reserves at acceptable
costs.
-48-
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Concl.)
Environmental regulation significantly affects the Companys business.
The Companys business operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations concern the
generation, storage, transportation, disposal or discharge of contaminants and greenhouse gases
into the environment, the reporting of such matters, and the general protection of public health,
natural resources, wildlife and the environment. Costs of compliance and liabilities could
negatively affect the Companys results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In
addition, compliance with environmental laws and regulations could require unexpected capital
expenditures at the Companys facilities or delay or cause the cancellation of expansion projects
or oil and natural gas drilling activities. Because the costs of complying with environmental
regulations are significant, additional regulation could negatively affect the Companys business.
Although the Company cannot predict the impact of the interpretation or enforcement of EPA
standards or other federal, state and local regulations, the Companys costs could increase if
environmental laws and regulations become more strict.
Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are
in various phases of discussions. If enacted or adopted, legislation or regulation that restricts
carbon emissions could increase the Companys cost of environmental compliance by requiring the
Company to install new equipment to reduce emissions from larger facilities and/or purchase
emission allowances. Proposed measures could also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to
obtain permits and other regulatory approvals with regard to existing and new facilities. The
effect (material or not) on the Company of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend
on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted.
Increased regulation of exploration and production activities, including hydraulic fracturing,
could adversely impact the Company.
Due to the burgeoning Marcellus Shale play in the northeast United States, together with the
fiscal difficulties faced by state governments in New York and Pennsylvania, various state
legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the exploration and production business are
possible. These initiatives could include new severance taxes for oil and gas production and new
statutes and regulations governing hydraulic fracturing of wells, surface owners rights and damage
compensation, the spacing of wells, and environmental and safety issues regarding natural gas
pipelines. Additionally, legislative initiatives in the U.S. Congress could negatively impact the
hydraulic fracturing process. If adopted, any such new state or federal legislation or
regulation could lead to operational delays, increased operating costs, additional regulatory
burdens and increased risks of litigation for the Companys Exploration and Production segment.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On October 1, 2009, the Company issued a total of 3,200 unregistered shares of Company common
stock to the eight non-employee directors of the Company then serving on the Board of Directors of
the Company and receiving compensation under the Companys Retainer Policy for Non-Employee
Directors, 400 shares to each such director. All of these unregistered shares were issued as
partial consideration for such directors services during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933,
as transactions not involving a public offering.
-49-
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Concl.)
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Share |
|
Under Share |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Repurchase Plans |
|
Repurchase Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased (a) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs (b) |
Oct. 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
7,949 |
|
|
|
$48.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,971,019 |
|
Nov. 1-30, 2009 |
|
|
8,423 |
|
|
|
$47.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,971,019 |
|
Dec. 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
257,886 |
|
|
|
$51.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,971,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
274,258 |
|
|
|
$51.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,971,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents (i) shares of common stock of the Company purchased on the open market
with Company matching contributions for the accounts of participants in the Companys 401(k)
plans, and (ii) shares of common stock of the Company tendered to the Company by holders of
stock options or shares of restricted stock for the payment of option exercise prices or
applicable withholding taxes. During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not
purchase any shares of its common stock pursuant to its publicly announced share repurchase
program. Of the 274,258 shares purchased other than through a publicly announced share
repurchase program, 24,553 were purchased for the Companys 401(k) plans and 249,705 were
purchased as a result of shares tendered to the Company by holders of stock options or shares
of restricted stock. |
|
(b) |
|
In December 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to eight million shares of the Companys common stock. The Company completed the repurchase
of the eight million shares during 2008. In September 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of an additional eight million shares of the Companys common stock.
The Company, however, stopped repurchasing shares after September 17, 2008 in light of the
unsettled nature of the credit markets. However, such repurchases may be made in the future,
either in the open market or through private transactions. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Description of long-term performance incentives under the
National Fuel Gas Company Performance Incentive Program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Description of performance goals under the Amended and Restated
National Fuel Gas Company 2007 Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive Program
and the National Fuel Gas Company Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statements regarding Computation of Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2009 and the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2006
through 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Written statements of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
-50-
Item 6. Exhibits (Concl.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Written statements of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated Statement of Income for the
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. |
-51-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ R. J. Tanski
|
|
|
R. J. Tanski |
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. M. Camiolo
|
|
|
K. M. Camiolo |
|
|
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: February 5, 2010
-52-