Darren Chaker in front of court house in San Diego
Darren Chaker forces San Diego Police to forfeit names of all police officers. This recent win makes it the ninth First Amendment victory for Darren Chaker.
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, April 16, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Despite the growing pressure for police accountability, the City of San Diego has admitted it violated the California Public Records Act when it refused to disclose the names of police officers to Darren Chaker.
On June 11, 2020, police stopped a female relative of Mr. Chaker while she was out for an evening walk in a park in the upscale coastal community of La Jolla, California. Police demanded identification without any reason or justification. Since she was out for a walk, she wasn't carrying a wallet and could not produce identification. But taken aback by their threatening demeanor, she refused to identify herself and asked to speak to a supervising officer. In response, police then forcibly handcuffed her, wresting her shoulder and back. The arrest in total lasted close to half an hour. After police learned the woman is an attorney who previously worked for the federal judiciary and United States Congress, they immediately released her without explanation. Two of the officers quickly hastened to an unmarked vehicle, refusing to write down their names or badge numbers, and then sped away, causing the need to identify the officers.
Mr. Chaker is a litigation support specialist and administrator for a police residential address database. Mr. Chaker learned of the unlawful arrest and knew that the officers broke the law with their "stop and identify" harassment tactic. The United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not illegal to refuse to identify oneself in Lawson v. Kolender, 658 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir.1981), aff’d., 461 U.S. 352 (1983). Ironically in that case, San Diego police repeatedly arrested a homeless African-American male who committed no crime, but refused to identify himself. The Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court found it was unconstitutional to arrest a person because he did not want to identify himself.
In an effort to vindicate the relative, Mr. Chaker filed a request under the California Public Records Act (CPRA) requesting the names of the officers involved and all officers for the police subdivision which covers La Jolla. The San Diego police refused to produce any of the officer’s names. Mr. Chaker then retained attorneys who specialize in public record litigation. Mr. Chaker’s attorneys filed a lawsuit in the San Diego Superior Court captioned, Darren Chaker v. City of San Diego, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 27-2020-00031074.
The attorney for the City of San Diego immediately found Mr. Chaker was entitled to the records he requested. However, in lieu of providing roughly 100 names of the single police subdivision originally requested, the City of San Diego instead was made to produce over 1,000 names of every single police officer for its entire department. The names were then matched with property records to add to the police residential address database. Further, the City of San Diego was forced to pay several thousands of dollars for Mr. Chaker's attorney fees. This marks Mr. Chaker’s ninth First Amendment victory.
Mr. Chaker's relative is readying for her own legal battle with the embattled San Diego Police Department that has been repeatedly beleaguered with scandal. Most recently Sgt. Joseph Ruvido was charged with soliciting sex from a minor, but committed suicide. Two weeks ago, Officer William Carter-Torres was arrested for using his firearm to threaten a female during a road rage incident. Last February, Sergeant Mariusz Czas was arrested for stalking. Officer Daniel Dana was arrested for rape and kidnapping a prostitute. San Diego Police is known for not recruiting top tier talent due to its low pay. Brian Marvel, president of the San Diego Police Officers Association, said “pay and benefits are the No. 1 reason recruits choose other agencies.”
In an effort to avoid litigation, Mr. Chaker reminded the San Diego Police Department its officers “are not part of the former KGB” and is entitled to the names of the few officers he requested. In lieu of complying, the City of San Diego challenged Darren Chaker and was forced to disclosed over a thousand names and pay his attorney fees.
Darren Chaker
Darren Chaker, Civil Rights Activist
darrenchaker@protonmail.com
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
