As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2005
Registration No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-11/S-3
FOR
REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
OF SECURITIES OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE COMPANIES
AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
(Exact Name of Registrant Issuer as Specified in Its Governing Instruments)
AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant Issuer as Specified in Its Governing Instruments)
600 Grant Street, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 291-0222
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number Including Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Scott L. Gesell
600 Grant Street, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 291-0222
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
Jeffrey
M. Knetsch, Esq.
Kirsten N. Neisler, Esq.
Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C.
410 Seventeenth Street, 22nd Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202-4437
(303) 223-1100
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
Total other expenses
118,284
124,297
190,950
127,620
Interest income
(1,523
)(5)
(1,439
)
(1,616
)
(1,439
)
Loss from continuing operations
(37,733
)
(38,756
)
(84,913
)
(43,267
)
Income from discontinued operations
1,915
31
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations
(8,549
)
3,333
Net loss
(37,733
)
(38,756
)
(91,547
)
(39,903
)
Preferred unit distributions
(9,752
)
Net loss attributable to common unitholders
$
(37,733
)
$
(38,756
)
$
(101,299
)
$
(39,903
)
(1) Same communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2003 and the communities sold or held for sale before December 31, 2004.
(2) Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations.
(3) Excludes $10.1 million of compensation expense related to stock issued in connection with ARCs IPO.
(4) Excludes property management expenses incurred in connection with the Hometown acquisition.
(5) Excludes interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARCs IPO, the financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition.
75
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002
Overview. Our results for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 include the operations of the 107 communities comprising 20,511 homesites and the retail home sales, insurance, consumer finance and other businesses we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year ended December 31, 2003 and for approximately eight months for the year ended December 31, 2002. In addition to the effects of the reorganization, our results for the year ended December 31, 2003 also reflect the effects on our operations of the 22 community acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003 and exclude the 30 communities that we discontinued in the third and fourth quarters of 2004.
Revenue. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $163.2 million, as compared to $136.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $26.7, or 20%. This increase was due to an increase of $33.3 million in rental income and a decrease of $6.6 million in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes and utility and other income.
Rental income increased by $33.3 million, consisting of $20.8 from the communities acquired in the reorganization, $8.0 million from other community acquisitions and $4.5 million from same communities. The increase in same communities revenues consists of $4.2 million from increased rental rates, $3.1 million from home renter rental income partially offset by $2.8 million from lower occupancy.
The decrease in other income of $6.6 million is due to a $10.3 million decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by a $3.7 million increase in utility and other income.
Property Operations Expense. For the year ended December 31, 2003, total property operations expense was $44.3 million, as compared to $33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.0 million, or 33%. The increase was due to increases in expenses of $7.8 million from communities we acquired in the reorganization, $3.1 million from other community acquisitions and $1.0 million from same communities. The increase on a same community basis was due primarily to higher salaries and benefits of $513,000, due to increased staffing and, to a lesser extent, increases in wages and employee benefits and higher bad debt expense of $478,000, as a result of increased tenant defaults caused by general economic conditions and reserves for rent owed by certain finance companies which own repossessed homes in our communities.
Real Estate Taxes Expense. Real estate taxes expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $10.2 million, as compared to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.6 million, or 55%. The increase was due primarily to communities we acquired in the reorganization, other community acquisitions and an increase in the number of rental homes we own.
Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold. The cost of manufactured homes sold was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.4 million, or 29%. The decrease was due primarily to a 121 unit decrease in sales of manufactured homes from 629 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 508 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2003, partially offset by the inclusion of the results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire year in 2003. The gross margin for manufactured homes sold was 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 19% for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expense. For the year ended December 31, 2003, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was $7.4 million, as compared to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 14%. This decrease is due to lower sales of manufactured homes and a lower cost structure as a result of eliminating the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores, partially offset by increases in expenses
76
resulting from the inclusion of results of the retail home sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire period in 2003 as compared to eight months for 2002.
Property Management Expense. Property management expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.5 million, as compared to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $1.4 million, or 34%. The increase was due primarily to inclusion of the results of the communities we acquired in the reorganization for an entire year in 2003.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $16.9 million, as compared to $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $3.8 million, or 29%. The increase was due primarily to the reorganization, a $900,000 one time charge for vacating unused office space, a non-recurring credit of $291,000 against our insurance expenses in 2002, and, in 2003, to higher professional services expenses related primarily to our manufactured home acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense was 10% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $46.5 million, as compared to $37.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $9.4 million, or 25%. The increase relates to the reorganization, other community acquisitions, related capital improvements and rental home acquisitions. This was partially offset by the increase in depreciable lives of community improvements from 20 years to 30 years made in connection with the reorganization.
Retail Home Sales and Insurance Asset and Goodwill Impairment and Other Expense. At the time of the reorganization, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of manufactured homes, beginning in late 2002 we redirected our retail home sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities. Our in-community retail home sales business operates in conjunction with our consumer finance business through which we provide credit to qualified buyers of homes in our communities.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, we substantially completed the redirection of our retail home sales efforts by selling 11 of our retail dealerships, ceasing operations in the remaining five retail dealerships and beginning in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. With respect to five retail dealerships we closed, we relocated the inventory to nearby manufactured home communities we own.
In connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million, net of sales proceeds of $1.3 million, to write off fixed assets and to record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we closed in 2003.
At December 31, 2002, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales, finance and insurance operations of $13.6 million. The impairment for the retail home sales and finance operations arose from a deterioration of its operating performance subsequent to the reorganization due to lower projected sales volumes caused by adverse market conditions of the manufactured home sales industry as a whole, the related finance industry, and the market for manufactured home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance operation arose because the insurance operation derives the majority of its revenue from the retail home sales and finance operations. We had no impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $57.4 million, as compared to $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $13.6 million, or 31%. The increase was due primarily to: additional indebtedness acquired in the reorganization of
77
$380.8 million, additional borrowings of $27.0 million under the rental home credit facility, $20.0 million under the preferred interest, $18.8 million under the BFND credit facility, and $4.3 million of indebtedness assumed in connection with community acquisitions. Such interest expense increases resulting from additional borrowings were partially offset by lower interest rates on variable rate debt.
Interest Income. Interesto
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each Class of |
|
|
Discontinued Operations. In the third quarter of 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12 communities and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a sales agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we entered into agreements to sell an additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we sold the Sunrise Mesa community. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we have reflected $31,000 of income from the operation of these assets and $3.3 million gain on the sale of the Sunrise Mesa community sale as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we have reflected $1.0 million of income from the operation of these assets as discontinued operations. Net Loss Attributable to Common Partnership Unitholders. As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $39.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $7.2 million, or 15%. The decrease was due to increases of $33.3 million in rental income, $3.7 million in utility and other income, and $2.3 million in income and gain on sale of discontinued operations and decreases of $7.4 million in cost of manufactured homes sold, $1.2 million in retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense and retail home sales and insurance asset and goodwill impairment of $12.1 million offset by decreases of $10.3 million in manufactured home sales, and increases of $11.1 million in property operations expense, $3.6 million in real estate taxes, $1.4 million in property management expenses, $3.7 million in general and adn:center;"> |
Amount To Be |
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 |
|
|
|
$96,600,000(1) |
|
78 The following tables present certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 on a historical and Same Communities basis. Same Communities reflects information for all communities owned by us at both January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. Same Communities does not include the twenty-two communities we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2003 or the community sold during 2003 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community, and per unit information).
(1) Represents the aggregate principal amount of the notes that were issued by Affordable Residential Communities LP in private placements in August 2005. (2) Equals the actual issue price of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being registered. (3) Estimated for the sole purpose of determining the registration fee based on Rule 457 under the Securities Act of 1933. (4) Reflects the number of shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.s common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes being registered hereunder, under certain conditions specified herein, at the initial rate of 69.8812 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes. Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement also registers such additional number of shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.s common stock as may become deliverable upon conversion of the notes to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions. (5) No separate consideration will be received for the shares of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.s common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes; therefore, no additional registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act of 1933. The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 2005 The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. PROSPECTUS
36,805 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupied homesites |
|
14,095 |
|
14,593 |
|
32,190 |
|
33,097 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total rental homes owned |
|
2,012 |
|
1,636 |
|
5,558 |
|
4,423 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupied rental homes |
|
1,503 |
|
1,197 |
|
4,114 |
|
3,002 |
|
(1) Average monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite defined as total real estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.
79
(2) Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite defined as homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided by the number of months in the period.
(3) Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite defined as total real estate revenue divide by average total homesites divided by the number of months in the period.
(4) Real estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations.
A reconciliation of our net segment income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows:
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Same |
|
As Reported |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net segment income: |
AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES INC. 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 Shares of Common Stock Issuable Upon Exchange of the Notes Affordable Residential Communities LP, or the Partnership, issued $96,600,000 aggregate principal amount of 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025, which are referred to in this prospectus as the notes, in private placements in August 2005. This prospectus will be used by selling securityholders to resell their notes and the common stock of the Partnerships general partner, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., or ARC, issuable upon exchange of their notes. We will not receive any proceeds from this offering. The notes bear interest at the rate of 71¤2% per year, payable in cash semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2006. The notes will mature on August 15, 2025. The notes are the Partnerships senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment with the Partnerships other senior unsecured indebtedness and effectively rank junior in right of payment to all of the Partnerships secured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and to the indebtedness and all other liabilities of the Partnerships subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2005, the Partnership had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness, and the Partnerships consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of other liabilities. Subject to the restrictions on ownership of common stock of ARC, and the conditions described in this prospectus, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption any outstanding notes (or portions thereof) into shares of ARC common stock, initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price of $14.31 per share of ARC commoe-break-after:avoid;"> |
|
|
|
|
Holders may require the Partnership to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their notes on August 15, 2010, August, 15, 2015 and August 15, 2020 at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. In addition, if a fundamental change, as described in this prospectus, occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may require the Partnership to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. Prior to August 20, 2010, the notes will not be redeemable at the Partnerships option. Beginning on August 20, 2010, the Partnership may redeem the notes in whole or in part at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of ARC common stock has exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period. There is no public market for the notes and we do not intend to apply for listing of the notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the notes through any automated quotation system. The notes currently trade on the Private Offerings, Resales and Trading through Automated Linkages, or PORTAL, system of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ARCs common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ARC. On October 21, 2005, the last quoted sale price of ARCs common stock was $9.81 per share. Neither the Partnership nor ARC will receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling securityholders of the notes or the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. The selling securityholders may offer the notes or the underlying common stock in negotiated transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. In addition, the common stock may be offered from time to time through ordinary brokerage transactions on the New York Stock Exchange. Certain selling securityholders may be deemed to be underwriters as defined in the Securities Act of 1933. If any broker-dealers are used by selling securityholders, any commissions paid to broker-dealers and, if broker-dealers purchase any notes or common stock as principals, any profits received by such broker-dealers on the resale of the notes or common stock, may be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, any profits realized by the selling securityholders may be deemed to be underwriting commissions. Other than selling commissions and fees and stock transfer taxes, we will pay all expenses of registering the notes and common stock and certain other expenses. Investing in the notes and the common stock issuable upon their exchange involves risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 16. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The date of this prospectus is [ ], 2005
2 This prospectus is part of a registration statement that ARC has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, using a shelf registration process. Under this shelf registration process, the selling securityholders may, from time to time, offer for sale the notes owned by them or shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. Each time the selling securityholders offer notes or shares for sale under this prospectus, they will provide a copy of this prospectus and, if applicable, a copy of a prospectus supplement to prospective purchasers. You should read both this prospectus and, if applicable, any supplement thereto. You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and, if applicable, any supplement hereto. We have not and the selling securityholders have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. Neither the notes nor any shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are being offered in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus speaks only as of the date of this prospectus, unless otherwise specified. Financial information regarding both ARC and the Partnership is presented in this prospectus because the notes were issued by the Partnership and are exchangeable for shares of ARC common stock. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Forms S-11 and S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect t:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders |
|
$ |
(13,030 |
) |
$ |
(4,658 |
) |
www.sec.gov. ARC is, and as a result of the offering of the notes, the Partnership will become, subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and, in accordance with these requirements, ARC files and the Partnership will file reports and other information with the SEC. We are required to file electronic versions of these documents with the SEC. Our reports, proxy statements and other information can be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC as described above and are available on the SECs website. 3 The SEC allows ARC to incorporate by reference certain of the information required by this prospectus, which means that ARC can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The infoyle="font-size:10.0pt;">$ |
(39,903 |
) |
$ |
(47,069 |
) |
(1) Same communities real estate net segment income excludes results of communities acquired after January 1, 2002 and community sold before December 31, 2003.
(2) Excludes segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1, 2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal liquidity demands have historically been, and, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the nature of the expenditures, are expected to continue to be, recurring and non-recurring capital improvements of communities, debt repayment, the purchase of new and used homes for lease and sale, funding loans to home buyers, property acquisitions, and partnership interest distributions. We intend to meet these liquidity requirements through our working capital provided by operating activities, available financing under our floor plan line of credit for home purchases, our consumer finance facility to fund home loans, our lease receivables line of credit to be secured by homes in our rental portfolio, other available unsecured financing, and the potential net proceeds from the sale of communities. We consider these sources to be adequate to meet all operating requirements, including recurring capital improvements, debt service, other normally recurring expenditures of a capital nature and, if necessary and
80
appropriate, payment of dividends to ARCs stockholders to maintain qualification as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.
Our operating cash flows have not been sufficient to cover the distributions to our partners that were made since ARCs IPO in February 2004. On May 23, 2005, we declared a reduced distribution to our partners for the second quarter of 2005. On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors announced that no distributions would be made on the Partnerships common partnership units for third quarter of 2005. ARCs board of directors reviews our practices with respect to the payment of distributions on a quarterly basis. Should our operating cash flows not improve, we may need to take additional action with respect to the payment of distributions, which may include the further reduction or elimination of our distributions to our partners.
Our plan is to increase occupancy through the following activities, as well as other initiatives that may be available to us. To accomplish our plans and objectives for the next 12 months, we may invest significant funds for the purchase of manufactured homes for sale, rent and lease with option to purchase. We expect to commit to these expenditures only as demand warrants and funds permit and we have entered into no significant forward purchase commitments with respect to such purchases. We also plan to make recurring capital expenditures, as necessary and appropriate, to keep our communities up to our standards and for general capital improvements.
We expect to fund our short-term liquidity needs through net cash provided by operations, borrowings under our $50 million floorplan line of credit, borrowings under our lease receivables line of credit which was expanded from $75 million to $150 million in October 2005 and other sources of capital, including the net proceeds from the sale of up to 79 communities that we have identified as held for sale. We also have the ability to sell additional communities if conditions warrant.
In addition, in order to facilitate sales of new and existing homes, we also plan to finance a significant portion of our home sales during 2005. We have a $125 million consumer finance facility to support our in-community home sales financing program under which we may finance up to 90% of the principal amount of qualifying loans made to qualifying home buyers.
We have extended the maturity date of our $85 million revolving credit mortgage facility to September 2006, and expect to refinance or extend our senior variable rate mortgage when due in 2006. In addition to our existing sources of capital, we have significant experience in raising private equity and we may in the future use that experience to enter into financing joint ventures or other similar arrangements if we determine that such a structure would provide an efficient means of raising capital.
Not withstanding the foregoing and based on our historical results, we do not believe that we will be able to fully fund our debt service obligations and recurring capital expenditures, as well as our operating plans and objectives described above, out of operating cash flows. Accordingly, our ability to implement our plans and occupancy objectives described above will depend upon our ability to obtain adequate funding from the financing sources described above or from other available funding sources. We cannot assure that we will be able to sell any or all of the 79 communities currently held for sale or additional communities, sell new or used homes, borrow under our consumer finance line of credit, refinance expiring credit lines or make other arrangements necessary to fund some or all of our activities to increase occupancy. Should we not be able to obtain sufficient funds for these purposes, we may determine that it is necessary to substantially defer or eliminate some or all of our plans and growth objectives that require these funds,rmation incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this prospectus, and information that ARC files later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede information contained in documents filed earlier with the SEC or contained in this prospectus. ARC incorporates by reference in this prospectus the documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until all of the securities offered hereby are sold:
· Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004;
· Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2005;
· Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on January 12, March 18, March 23, April 5, April 12, May 9, May 23, June 10, July 19, July 29, August 1, August 9, August 22, August 23, September 13, September 27, October 19, and October 26, 2005; and
· Description of ARCs capital stock contained in its registration statement on Form 8-A filed on February 9, 2004.
Upon receipt of an oral or written request we will provide, free of charge, to any person to whom a prospectus is delivered, a copy of any or all of the information that has been incorporated by reference in the prospectus but not delivered with the prospectus, other than the exhibits to those documents. Please direct your written requests to: Investor Relations, Affordable Residential Communities Inc., 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203. Please direct your oral requests to: Investor Relations at (866) 847-8931.
In addition, for as long as any of the notes remain outstanding and during any period in which we are not subject to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we will make available to any prospective purchaser or beneficial owner of the securities in connection with the sale thereof that information required by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.
FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS ONLY
NEITHER THE FACT THAT A REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN APPLICATION OR A LICENSE HAS BEEN FILED UNDER CHAPTER 421-B OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT WITH THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NOR THE FACT THAT A SECURITY IS EFFECTIVELY REGISTERED OR A PERSON IS LICENSED TO SELL SECURITIES IN THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTITUTES A FINDING BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE THAT ANY DOCUMENT FILED UNDER RSA 421-B IS TRUE, COMPLETE AND NOT MISLEADING. NEITHER ANY SUCH FACT NOR THE FACT THAT AN EXEMPTION OR EXCEPTION IS AVAILABLE FOR A SECURITY OR A TRANSACTION MEANS THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE HAS PASSED IN ANY WAY UPON THE MERITS OR QUALIFICATIONS OF, OR RECOMMENDED OR GIVEN APPROVAL TO, ANY PERSON, SECURITY OR TRANSACTION. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE, OR CAUSE TO BE MADE, TO ANY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER, CUSTOMER OR CLIENT ANY REPRESENTATION INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH.
4
Market data used or incorporated by reference in this prospectus is based on the good faith estimates of our management, which estimates are based upon their review of internal surveys, independent industry publications and other publicly available information. Although we believe these sources are reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of statements regarding the market and industry data presented or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading Risk Factors.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation R including community and home purchases, consumer loans, and non-recurring capital expenditures.
81
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Cash provided by operations was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared with $19.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by operations primarily was due to payments made in the first half of 2005 for substantial accruals incurred at the end of 2004 for capital expenditures and repairs and maintenance activities as compared to a relatively low level of such payments in the first half of 2004.
Cash used in investing activities was $39.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $576.8 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash used in investing activities primarily was due to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions in the first half of 2004, as well as proceeds from community sales in the first half of 2005. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.
Cash provided by financing activities was $18.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $579.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily was due to the issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred unit issuances in connection with ARCs IPO in the first half of 2004, as well as increases in the repayment of existing indebtedness and distribution payments in the first half of 2005.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003
Cash provided by operations was $27.0 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operations for 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to increased homesites resulting from our Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions.
Cash used in investing activities was $607.6 million and $47.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions and an increase in acquisitions of other communities and manufactured homes. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.
Cash provided by financing activities was $593.8 million and $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred partnership unit issuances in connection with ARCs IPO, partially offset by the repayment of existing indebtedness and the payment of both common and preferred unit distributions.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002
Cash provided by operations was $10.7 million and $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease for 2003 was due primarily to changes in operatieform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus that address results or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, where statements are preceded by, followed by or include the words believes, expects, may, will, would, could, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, projects, estimates or anticipates or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words ong assets and liabilities partially offset by a reduction in manufactured home inventory held for sale.
Cash used in investing activities was $47.7 million and $137.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 compared to 2002 was due primarily to reduced levels of community acquisitions and rental home purchases. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets.
Cash provided by financing activities was $25.4 million and $137.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 as compared to 2002 was primarily due to lower borrowing for community acquisitions and rental homes, funds provided in 2002 from the
82
reorganization and issuance of common partnership units, partially offset by funding of the rental home credit facility in 2003.
Inflation in the U.S. has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 or the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Although the impact of inflation has been relatively insignificant in recent years, it remains a factor in the United States economy and may increase the cost of acquiring or replacing property, plant, and equipment and the costs of labor and utilities.
At June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, we had $1,049.3 million of pro forma consolidated indebtedness outstanding with the following repayment obligations (in thousands):
(1) $140.5 million of senior variable rate mortgage debt due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month periods at our option and subject to certain conditions.
The fair value of debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, was approximately $1,076.4 million.
83
Consolidated Indebtedness to be Outstanding After Our Offering
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our pro forma consolidated indebtedness outstanding as of June 30, 2005 after giving effect to the sale of the notes and the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities (dollars in thousands):
As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents income (loss) from continuing operations (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for managements discretionary use because of nprogram, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and also could result in significant changes to the structure and terms of the program, which could increase the costs to us of continuing the program or otherwise adversely affect our ability to continue to maintain the program, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to increase occupancy and improve our results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain and improve our occupancy through expansion of our in-community home sales and financing initiative, which could adversely affect our revenues and our results of operations.
We have responded to the challenging operating environment for manufactured home communities by developing and implementing a range of programs and initiatives aimed at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, including our in-community home sales and financing initiative. Our ability to maintain and increase occupancy and improve our operating margins in our existing communities in the future will depend to some degree upon the success of this initiative. Through our in-community home sales and financing initiative, we intend to significantly expand our capability both to acquire for sale manufactured home inventory and sell these homes to customers in our communities at reasonable prices and to finance sales of these homes to customers in our communities. We have obtained a multiyear debt facility pursuant to which we will be able to fund up to $125.0 million to support loan originations in connection with the sale of homes in our communities. If we are not able to maintain this debt facility, we do not expect to be able to fully fund this initiative, which could significantly impair our ability to maintain or increase our occupancy in our communities and to achieve growth in our revenue and operating margins. Additionally, if we do not have sufficient capital available to purchase additional homes in the future, we may not be able to implement or fully implement these programs or initiatives, which could significantly impair our ability to maintain or increase our occupancy in our communities and to achieve growth in our revenues and operating margins.
The availability of advances of funds under our consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on this facility include a downgrade of the lenders credit rating and the absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio.
Although some members of our management group have experience in the consumer finance business, we have limited operating history in the consumer finance business, and we cannot assure you
18
that we will be able to successfully expand this initiative and manage this business. Loans produced by our in-community home sales and financing initiative may have higher default rates than we anticipate, and demand for consumer financing may not be as great as we anticipate or may decline.
Our in-community home sales and financing initiative operates in a regulated industry with significant licensing and consumer protection laws, and the regulatory framework may change in a manner that may adversely affect our operating results. The regulatory environment and associated consumer finance laws create a risk of greater liability from our in-community home sales and financing initiative and could subject us to private claims and awards. This initiative is dependent on licenses granted by state, federal and local regulatory bodies, which may be withdrawn or which may not be renewed and which could have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve our operating objectives. We have obtained many, and are in the process of obtaining all of the remaining state and local licenses and permits necessary for us to implement this initiative in all of the markets in which we operate.
The terms of our acquisition agreement with Hometown may cause us to incur additional costs and liabilities.
Pursuant to the acquisition agreement with Hometown, we have assumed all liabilities and obligations of Hometown with respect to the Hometown communities and the other acquired assets, whether known or unknown, absolute or contingent, and whether arising before or after the date we acquired the Hometown communities, subject to limited exceptions. In addition, Hometown is not required to indemnify us for any inaccuracy in or breach of any of its representations or warranties in the agreement. As a result of these provisions, we are responsible for liabilities and obligations with respect to the Hometown communities and the other acquired assets for which we have no recourse to Hometown or anyone else, and we may incur unanticipated costs in connection with the assumption and satisfaction of these obligations as well as in ownership and operation of the Hometown communities, in excess of our expected costs.
The manufactured housing industry continues to face a challenging operating environment marked by a shortage of available financing for home purchases and a significant decrease in manufactured home shipments, which has put downward pressure on occupancy in manufactured home communities and may continue to do so.
The manufactured housing industry continues to face a challenging operating environment that has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies. According to MHI, industry shipments (a measure of manufacturing production and wholesale sales) have declined from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this ongoing period of challenging industry conditions was the result of an oversupply of consumer credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing, retail home sales and financing sectors of the industry. When compared to the manufacturing, retail home sales and consumer finance sectors of the manufactured housing industry, the manufactured home community sector has been relatively less affected by the oversupply of consumer credit but is also facing challenging conditions, including an increase in the number of repossessed and abandoned homes, a shortage of consumer financing to support new manufactured home sales and move-ins and resale of existing homes in manufactured home communities, and historically low mortgage interest rates and favorable credit terms for traditional entry-level, site-built housing, all of which has put downward pressure on occupancy levels in our manufactured home communities and may continue to do so. We expect industry conditions will remain difficult for the foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the United States and a continued shortage of consumer financing for manufactured home buyers.
19
We have reported historical accounting losses on a consolidated basis since our inception, and we may continue to report accounting losses in the future.
We had net losses attributable to common partnership unitholders of $36.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and $101.3 million, $39.9 million and $47.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As of June 30, 2005, our retained deficit was $330.4 million. There can be no assurance that we will not continue to incur net losses in the future, which could adversely affect our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and our ability to pay dividends or make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock.
We may not be successful in identifying suitable acquisitions that meet our criteria, in completing such acquisitions, or in successfully integrating and operating acquired properties, which may impede our growth and negatively affect our results of operations.
Our ability to expand through acquisitions has historically been a significant part of our business expansion strategy and requires us to identify suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet our criteria and are compatible with our growth strategy. We may not be successful in identifying suitable real estate properties or other assets that meet our acquisition criteria or in consummating acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms. If we do not have sufficient capital, we may be limited or precluded from pursuing additional acquisitions. Also, a lack of sufficient depth of management may limit or preclude additional acquisitions. Failure to identify or consummate acquisitions will reduce the number of acquisitions we complete and slow our growth, which could in turn adversely affect our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock.
Although we are currently less focused on community acquisition opportunities than in the past, we will continue to evaluate available manufactured home communities in select markets when strategic opportunities arise. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully integrate and operate them may be exposed to the following significant risks:
· we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from local investors and other real estate investors with significant capital, including other publicly traded REITs and institutional investment funds;
84
accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.
The following table calculates our FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004(1) |
|
2004(1)(2) |
|
2003(3) |
|
2002(4) |
|
|||||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(16,351 |
) |
$ |
(5,326 |
) |
$ |
(30,384 |
) |
$ |
(42,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(84,913 |
· even if we are able to
acquire a desired property, competition from other potential acquirers may
significantly increase the purchase price which could reduce our profitability;
· we may not have sufficient capital available to make additional acquisitions, or we may be unable to finance acquisitions at all or on favorable terms; · we may spend more than the time and amounts budgeted to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties; · we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly multi-property acquisitions, portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and consequently our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected; · market conditions or downturns in local economies may result in higher than expected vacancy rates and lower than expected rental rates; and · we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities such as liabilities for cleanup of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the former 20 owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties. The availability of competing housing alternatives in our markets could negatively affect occupancy levels and rents in our communities, which could adversely affect our revenue and our results of operations. All of our properties are located in markets that include other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability to sell our homes, lease our homes and/or homesites and to maintain or raise rents. Other forms of multi-family residential properties and single-family housing, including rental properties, represent competitive alternatives to our communities. The availability of a number of other housing options, such as apartment units and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more favorable financing alternatives for the same, could have an adverse effect on our occupancy and rents, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could adversely affect our financial condition and our cash flow. We maintain comprehensive liability, fire, flood (where appropriate), extended coverage and rental loss insurance with respect to our properties with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. Certain types of losses, however, may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, riots or acts of war or terrorism. Should an uninsured loss occur, we could lose both our investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flow from, a property, which could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. In addition, if any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay a significant deductible on any claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss. Exposure to mold and contamination related claims that are problematic to insure against could adversely affect our results of operations. We own a significant number of rental homes, which we lease or sell to third parties. In each of these rental homes, we run a risk of mold, mildew and /or fungus related claims if these items are found in any home. In addition, we provide water and sewer systems in certain of our communities and we are subject to the risk that if a home is not properly connected to a system, or if the integrity of the system is breached, mold or other contamination can develop. If this were to occur, we could incur significant remedial costs and we may also be subject to private damage claims and awards, which could be material. If we become subject to claims in this regard, it could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and insurability, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with operating our communities may affect our results of operations. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, owners and operators of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on or in such property. Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such 21 substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owners or operators ability to lease, sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials. In connection with the ownership (direct or indirect), operation, management and development of real properties, we may be considered an owner or operator of such properties or as having arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property. No assurances can be given that existing environmental studies with respect to any of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of our properties did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our properties. Furthermore, material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may have arisen after the review was completed or may arise in the future; and future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material additional environmental liability, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results from operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Increases in taxes may reduce our income. Costs resulting from changes in real estate tax laws generally are not passed through to tenants directly and will affect us. Increases in income, service or other taxes generally are not passed through to tenants under leases and may adversely affect our net income, funds from operations, cash flow, financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Rent control or rent stabilization legislation and other regulatory restrictions may limit our ability to increase rents or dispose of our properties. Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and
regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured
home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing
restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain
circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusal on a
sale of their community by the owner to a third party. Enactments of similar
laws and regulations have been or may be considered from time to time in other
jurisdictions. We currently own 8,364
homesites in two states that have rent control regulations, Florida and
California. These communities represent 9.8% of our total communities and 13.3%
of our total homesites. Following the sale of up to 79 65pt;">
) |
|
$ |
(43,267 |
) |
$ |
(48,109 |
) |
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
22,224 |
|
17,242 |
|
42,255 |
|
32,152 |
|
|
72,014 |
|
|
46,467 |
|
37,058 |
|
|||||||
Income from discontinued operations. |
|
72 |
|
343 |
|
1,000 |
|
795 |
|
|
22 Costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 may result in unanticipated expenses. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws may also require modifications to our properties, or restrict certain further renovations of the properties, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could require substantial capital expenditures. Although we believe that our properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance and we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation. If one or more of our communities is not in compliance with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation, then we would be required to incur additional costs to bring the community into compliance. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA, the FHAA or other legislation, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. We may incur significant costs complying with other regulations applicable to our business. The properties in our portfolio, as well as sale of homes located thereon, are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local licensing, fire, health and safety, zoning, use and utility compliance requirements, and disclosure or warranty requirements. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we might incur governmental fines or private damage awards or may have significant limitations placed on our operations. In addition, requirements may change, and future requirements may require us to materially alter our operations or to make significant unanticipated expenditures that could adversely affect our net income, funds from operations, cash flow and financial condition, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Expansion of our existing communities entails certain risks that may negatively affect our operating results. We may expand our existing communities where a community contains or is adjacent to undeveloped land and where the land is zoned to allow for manufactured housing. The manufactured home community expansion business involves significant risks in addition to those involved in the ownership and operation of established manufactured home communities, including the risks that financing may not be available on favorable terms for expansion projects, that the cost of construction may exceed estimates or budgets, that construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs, that long-term financing may not be available on completion of construction, and that homesites may not be leased on profitable terms or at all. In connection with any expansion of our existing communities, if any of the above occurred, our financial condition, results of operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. 23 The pro forma financial data of the Partnership and ARC included in this prospectus may differ from actual results if any of the 79 communities held for sale are not sold or are sold for prices different than those used to prepare the data. The pro forma financial data of the Partnership and ARC included in this prospectus contemplates the sale of all of the 79 communities identified on September 21, 2005 as held for sale. There can be no assurances that the sale of all or any of these communities will occur, and, to the extent that they do occur, that they will be sold at the community sales prices used by the Partnership and ARC to prepare the pro forma financial data. If any of these communities are not sold or are sold at prices other than those used to prepare the pro forma financial data, actual results for the Partnership and ARC will differ from the results presented in the data. Risks Related to Our Other Debt Financings We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash to operate our communities or to pay our quarterly distributions or any distributions necessary to maintain ARCs REIT status. As of June 30,
2005, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to ARCs proposed sale of up to
79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, we
had approximately $1,049.3 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting
of $926.9 million of secured debt, as well as the notes and $25.8 million
in trust preferred securities which were each unsecured, including (1) a
two-year, $150.0 million securedt 0pt;width:37.85pt;">
1,915 |
|
|
31 |
|
1,040 |
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations |
|
(18 |
) |
1,085 |
|
5 |
|
1,825 |
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
2,589 |
|
1,957 |
|
|||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Amortization of loan origination fees. |
|
(1,911 |
) |
(855 |
) |
Our level of indebtedness and the limitations imposed on us by our credit agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following: · our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments; · we may be unable to borrow additional funds, either on favorable terms or at all, as needed, including to make acquisitions or to make any distributions, including those required to maintain ARCs REIT status; · we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness; · because a portion of our indebtedness bears interest at variable rates, an increase in interest rates could materially increase our interest expense; · we may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms; 24 · after debt service, the amount available for distributions to the Partnerships limited partners or ARCs stockholders is reduced; · our level of indebtedness could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness; · we may experience increased vulnerability to economic and industry downturns, reducing our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions; · we may default on our obligations and the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure their loans and receive an assignment of rents and leases; · we may violate restrictive covenants in our loan documents, which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations; · our default under any one of our mortgage loans with cross default or cross collateralization provisions could result in default on other indebtedness or result in the foreclosures of other properties; and · we may not be able to acquire additional homes to be held for sale or placed in our rental fleet, or we may not be able to acquire additional communities. We could become more highly leveraged because our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur. While some of our debt facility agreements may contain some limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or ARC may incur, our organizational documents contain no such limitations. Although we intend to maintain a balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our portfolio, we could alter this balance at any time. If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness, including the notes, and to pay any distributions required to maintain ARCs REIT status. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the proposed sale of up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, our debt to partners capital ratio is 1.7 to 1. Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our cash flow, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. As of June 30, 2005, approximately 30% of our debt was subject to variable interest rates. An increase in interest rates could increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our cash flow, our ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and our ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis, we had a total of $281.2 million of variable rate debt bearing a weighted average interest rate of approximately 6.9% per annum. On February 26, 2004, we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100.0 million of our variable rate debt. As a result, as of June 30, 2005, approximately 80% of our total indebtedness was subject to fixed interest rates until February 2006. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations. We seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements that involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial 25 condition, results of operations, ability to service our indebtedness, including the notes, and ability to make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARCs common stock. Our growth depends on external sources of capital that are outside of our control. (3,772 |
) |
(1,722 |
) |
|
(5,952 |
) |
|
(3,213 |
) |
(4,129 |
) |
|||||||
Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and vehicles |
|
(529 |
) |
(81 |
) |
(951 |
) |
(449 |
)In order to maintain ARCs qualification as a REIT, it is required under the Internal Revenue Code to annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, ARC will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that ARC distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income, including any net capital gains. Due to these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any acquisition financing, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may be required to rely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain the financing on favorable terms or at all. Any additional indebtedness we incur may increase our leverage. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on: · general market conditions; · our current level of indebtedness; · our current and expected future earnings; · our cash flow and cash distributions; · the markets perception of our operations and growth potential; and · the market price per share of ARCs common stock. If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources, we may not be able to acquire additional communities or homes to be held for sale or rent when strategic opportunities exist, service our indebtedness, including the notes, and make distributions to ARCs stockholders necessary to maintain its qualification as a REIT. Risks Related to Organizational and Corporate Structure Our business could be harmed if key personnel terminate their employment with us.
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
(1,112 |
) |
(1,019 |
) |
|||||||
FFO |
|
Our success is dependent on the efforts of our executive officers and senior management team. The loss of the services of this key personnel could materially and adversely affect our operations. ARCs Vice Chairman has outside business interests that could require time and attention. Scott D. Jackson, ARCs Vice Chairman, has outside business interests which include his ownership of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company, or Global Mobile, and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc., or JJ&T, both of which own six manufactured home communities through a commonly owned subsidiary, Global E. In addition, Mr. Jacksons employment agreement includes an exception to his noncompetition covenant pursuant to which Mr. Jackson is permitted to devote time to the management and operations of Global Mobile and JJ&T, consistent with past practice. As a result, these outside business interests could potentially interfere with Mr. Jacksons ability to devote time to our business and affairs. We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business without stockholder or noteholder consent, which may result in riskier investments than our current investments. We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business at any time without the consent of ARCs stockholders or the holders of the notes, which could result in our making investments and engaging in business activities that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments and businesses described in this prospectus. A change in our investment strategy or our 26 01pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">3,487 |
|
12,408 |
|
8,153 |
|
(9,977 |
) |
|
(15,066 |
) |
|
1,495 |
|
(13,202 |
) |
|||||||
entry into new lines of business
may increase our exposure to interest rate and other risk or real estate market
fluctuations. ARCs failure to qualify as a REIT could result in higher
tax expenses and reduced cash available to service our indebtedness. Although we
believe that ARC has operated and intends to continue to operate in a manner
that enables it to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, no assurance can be given that ARC will continue
to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain so qualified. Qualification
as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual
and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial or
administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual
matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. If ARC fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and
specified statutory relief provisions did not apply, ARC would not be allowed a
deduction for dividends paid to its stockholders in computing its taxable
income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax (including any
applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at corporate tax
rates. Moreover, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions,
ARC also would be disqualified from electing to be a REIT for the four taxable
years following the year during which such qualification is lost. This
treatment could reduce our net earnings available for investment or debt
service because of the additional tax liability to ARC for the years involved.
As a result of the additional U.S. federal income tax liability, we might need
to borrow funds or liquidate certain investments on terms that may be
disadvantageous to us in order to pay the applicable tax, and ARC would not be
compelled to make distributions to stockholders under the Internal Revenue
Code. Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by
our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on co-venturers
financial condition and disputes between us and our co-venturers. We may co-invest in the future with third parties through
partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, acquiring non-controlling
interests in or sharing responsibility for managing the affairs of a property,
partnership, joint venture or other entity. In such event, we would not be in a
position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the
property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. Investments in
partnerships, joint ventures, or other entities may, under certain
circumstances, involve risks not present were a third party not invol;">Less preferred unit distributions. |
|
(2,971 |
) |
(2,578 |
) |
(5,942 |
) |
(3,810 |
) |
|
(9,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
FFO available to common partnership unitholders |
|
$ |
516 |
|
$ |
9,830 |
|
$ |
2,211 |
|
$ |
(13,787 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,818 |
) |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
$ |
(13,202 |
) |
(1) Our FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARCs IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition.
(2) FFO for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes charges for the following: (i) retail losses of $11.2 million related to sales of older vacant homes sold during the fourth quarter at discounts to their original costs and marketing and promotion costs both incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance costs related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief operating officer and the second quarter resignation of other executive officers; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in the Southeast United States.
(3) FFO for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of $1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space and $337,000 in executive severance.
(4) FFO for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including $1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of unamortized loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses. For more details see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
85
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We use some derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.
As of June 30, 2005, our pro forma debt outstanding was $1,049.3 million, comprised of $768.1 million of indebtedness subject to fixed interest rates and $281.2 million, or 26.8%, of our total consolidated debt, subject to variable interest rates. In February 2004 we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100 million of our variable rate debt. As a result, approximately 80% of our total indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for a minimum of two years.
If LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.2 million annually. If, after consideration of the interest rate swap agreement described above, LIBOR and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.2 million annually.
Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.
The fair value of pro forma debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1,076.4 million.
86
AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP
The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership whose sole general partner is ARC. As of June 30, 2005, ARC owned approximately 94.8% of the Partnerships outstanding partnership interests. ARC is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT.
We acquire, renovate, reposition and operate primarily all-age manufactured home communities. We also lease with the option to purchase, rent and sell manufactured homes, finance sales of manufactured homes and act as agent in the sale of homeowners insurance and other related insurance products, all exclusively to residents and prospective residents in our communities.
As of June 30, 2005, we owned and operated 315 manufactured home communities (excluding one community held for sale) in 27 states containing 62,942 homesites. These properties are located in 67 markets across the United States. Our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all these communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy objectives. After taking into account the proposed sale of these communities, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6% of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data for a further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes.
ARCs predecessor was formed in 1995. In the first quarter of 2004, ARC completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of 25,300,209 shares of ARC common stock (including 2,258,617 shares sold by selling securityholders) and 5,000,000 shares of ARCs 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. In conjunction with the IPO, we also completed a financing transaction involving Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, consisting of $500 million of new mortgage debt and the repayment of some of our existing indebtedness. We used a portion of the proceeds from ARCs IPO and the financing transaction to acquire 90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C., or Hometown. See Note 3 to the Partnerships annual audited financial statements included in this prospectus for a further discussion of the Hometown acquisition.
Our principal executive, corporate and property management offices are located at 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado 80203, and our telephone number is (303) 383-7500. Our internet address is www.aboutarc.com. The information contained on our website is not part of this prospectus.
Our principal business objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in cash flow per share and to maximize returns to our stockholders. Our key operating objectives include the following:
Community Renovation and Repositioning. We utilize a comprehensive four-stage process that we call B-F-F-R to renovate and reposition the communities we acquire and improve their operating
87
performance. B-F-F-R stands for: Buyacquisition, Fixphysical infrastructure and resident quality, Filloccupancy level, Runongoing, long-term operations. Our prior acquisitions generally have targeted communities that demonstrate opportunities for improvement in operating results due to one or more of the following characteristics:
· below market rate leases;
· high operating expenses;
· poor infrastructure and quality of residents;
· inadequate capitalization; or
· a lack of professional management.
While community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operations.
With respect to the other stages of the B-F-F-R process, we have established district and regional management that has a sufficiently limited span of control to allow for strong focus on community development. We have also established a mobile management team positioned to address specific issues related to particular markets and drive new programs. We focus on our communities utilizing B-F-F-R according to their relative occupancy levels as follows:
· For communities above 90% occupancy, we primarily focus on improving operating margins through expense and overhead management, utility recovery and creation of additional revenue sources (as of June 30, 2005, 131 communities with 23,222 homesites averaging 96% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities with 20,246 homesites averaging 95.5% occupancy);
· For communities between 80% and 90% occupancy, we focus on sales and leasing activities, resident retention and delivering the necessary homes to the community to allow for occupancy growth (as of June 30, 2005, 96 communities with 20,331 homesites averaging 86% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 77 communities with 17,262 homesites averaging 85.9% occupancy); and
· For communities below 80% occupancy, we focus on developing community management and sales staff, making capital expenditures, supplying necessary homes to provide for occupancy growth and establishing resident standards with respect to behavior and rent payment (as of June 30, 2005, 47 communities with 10,057 homesites between 70% and 80% occupancy averaging 76% occupancy and another 41 communities with 9,332 homesites below 70% occupancy averaging 63% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 28 communities with 6,825 homesites between 70% and 80% averaging 76% occupancy and another 21 communities with 5,135 homesites below 70% averaging 64.3% occupancy).
Significant Presence in Key Markets. As of June 30, 2005, approximately 69% of our homesites were located in our 20 largest markets. Upon completion of the proposed sale of the 79 communities, approximately 79% of our homesites will be in our 20 largest markets. We believe we have a leading market share in 15 of these markets, based on number of homesites. To the extent that we acquire new communities, we focus our growth in select markets characterized by limited development, expensive alternative housing costs, a strong, diversified economic base and/or opportunity to increase our market share and achieve economies of scale. Increasing our presence and market share enables us to (i) achieve operating efficiencies and economies of scale by leveraging our local property management infrastructure and other operating overhead over a larger number of communities and homesites, (ii) provide potential residents with a broader range of affordable housing options in their market, (iii) increase our visibility and brand recognition and leverage advertising costs and (iv) obtain more favorable terms and faster
88
turnaround time on construction, renovation, repairs and home installation services. We believe the significant size and geographic diversity of our portfolio reduces our exposure to risks associated with geographic concentration, including the risk of economic downturns or natural disasters in any one market in which we operate.
Broad Based Marketing Efforts. We have developed and implemented a number of marketing initiatives to enhance the visibility of our communities, maintain and improve our occupancy, and identify, reward and lengthen the lease duration of our good customers. We have active marketing and sales teams at both the corporate and local market level. Our home lease with option to purchase program allows residents who might not otherwise qualify for home ownership through traditional purchase or financing avenues the opportunity to work towards home ownership while they lease. Our ability to provide financing to our residents and prospective residents is supported by our consumer finance facility. We have also established a Hispanic marketing initiative targeted at addressing the specific needs and cultural preferences of the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population.
Proactive Management to Maximize Occupancy. In response to challenging industry conditions, particularly the shortage of available consumer financing for the purchase of manufactured housing, we have developed and implemented a range of programs aimed primarily at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, improving resident satisfaction and retention, increasing revenue and improving our operating margins. We focus on converting long-term renters into homeowners and improving occupancy through the sale of older homes for cash, the financing of sales of newer homes and the leasing of newer homes with an option to purchase.
Customer Satisfaction and Quality Control. Our goal is to meet the needs of our residents or prospective residents for housing alternatives in a clean and attractive environment at affordable prices. We have established a nationwide call center with bilingual staff to manage resident communications and enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We approach our business with a consumer product focus having an emphasis on value and quality for our residents and prospective residents. We have quality assurance programs executed through employee training and adherence to guidelines developed by our senior management, based in part upon surveys of our customers. Our customer focus and quality controls are designed to provide consistency and quality of product and to enable our community managers to effectively market our communities and improve occupancy and resident retention across our portfolio.
Community Acquisitions/Dispositions. Over the last ten years, ARC has acquired over 340 communities with over 70,000 homesites. We have invested in dedicated resources, including acquisition, due diligence, construction and marketing teams which allowed us to significantly broaden our acquisition prospects, incorporating stabilized and non-stabilized communities. We have compiled a proprietary computer database containing detailed information on over 28,000 manufactured home communities located throughout the United States, which enables us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities quickly, often before the community has been marketed publicly. However, while community acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more focused on community operation. In addition, we also sold more than 30 communities, and have announced plans to sell up to an additional 79 communities, when it became evident that these communities did not fit our market or performance objectives. We continue to evaluate our property portfolio and may sell additional properties in the future.
Home Rental Program. Our real estate segment revenue consists of homeowner rental income, home renter rental income and utility and other income. We receive homeowner rental income from homeowners who lease homesites in our communities, and we receive home renter rental income from persons who rent manufactured homes and homesites from us in our communities pursuant to our home rental program and our home lease with option to purchase program. For the six months ended June 30,
89
partners under Delaware law in connection with the management of the Partnership. ARCs duties as general partner may come into conflict with the duties of its directors and officers to ARC. The Partnerships partnership agreement does not require us to resolve such conflicts in favor of either ARC or the Partnerships limited partners.
Unless
otherwise provided for in the relevant partnership agreement, Delaware law
generally rER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 26 14:06 2005' -->
2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, home
renter rental income totaled $22.9 million, or approximately 20% of our
total real estate revenue, and $40.3 million, or approximately 20% of our
total real estate revenue, respectively, and homeowner rental income totaled
$78.7 million, or approximately 70% of our total real estate revenue, and
$145 million, or approximately 71% of our total real estate revenue,
respectively. At June 30, 2005, we owned a total of 8,718 homes in our
communities with acquisition and improvement costs of $249.2 million,
which are rented, available for rent or for sale. These homes had an occupancy
rate of approximately 86% at June 30, 2005. We intend to continue to
expand our home rental program in the future. Home Lease with Option to Purchase. Our home lease with option
to purchase program is a program that we initiated in 2004 to address the
demand for home ownership in that segment of the population that might not
otherwise qualify to finance the purchase of a home or pay cash. Under this
program, a resident enters into a long term lease of a home, typically 24 to
84 months. Over the term of the lease, the resident makes rental payments
for the home, and makes additional monthly payments which, if the resident
elects to exercise the purchase option, are applied to the purchase price of
the home. The resident pays a non-refundable option fee at the time of
execution of the home lease. The lease may be terminated at any time by the
payment of a termination fee by the resident as provided in the lease, and in
the event of such termination, the resident forfeits all additional payments
made through the date of termination of the lease. The resident has the right
to purchase the home at any time during the term of the lease for a stated
purchase price as provided in the lease. The resident also executes a separate
homesite lease as part of this program, and agrees that upon the exercise of
the purchase option to maintain the home in our community for an additional
period of at least 48 months. This program is only offered on homes we own
located in our communities. Additionally,
the Partnerships partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of ARC
by providing that ARC, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or
accountable in damages to the Partnership, its limited partners or assignees
for errors in judgment, mistakes of fact or law or for any act or omission if
ARC, or such director or officer, acted in good faith. In addition, the
Partnership is required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and each of its respective
officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable law against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint
or several, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or
such other persons, provided that the Partnership will not indemnify for (i) willful
misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) any transaction for
which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach
of any provision of our partnership agreement. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law
fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement
have not been resolved in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion
of counsel covering the provisions set forth in our partnership agreement that
purport to waive or restrict ARCs fiduciary duties that would be in effect
under common law were it not for our partnership agreement. We may suffer adverse consequences if we expand or enter
into new non-real estate business ventures. We own or
invest in businesses that currently or may in the future engage in more diverse
and riskier ventures, such as the sale of manufactured homes, the leasing of
manufactured homes with an option to purchase, and financing of manufactured
home sales on a broader scale (rather than only to customers in our
communities), inventory financing, sales of home improvement products,
brokerage of manufactured homes, acting as agent for sales of insurance and
related products, third-party property management and other non-real
estate business ventures that ARCs management and board of directors
determine, using reasonable business judgment, will benefit the Partnership and
ARC. If we seek to enter into new non-real estate business
ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate business ventures, we may
risk our ability to maintain the REIT status of ARC. In addition, this strategy
would expose the holders of our securities to more risk than a business
strategy in which our operations are limited to real estate business ventures,
because we do not have the same experience in non-real estate business ventures
that we do in the ownership and operation of manufactured home communities and
the related businesses we conduct. Certain provisions of Maryland law and ARCs organizational
documents, including the stock ownership limit imposed by its charter, may
inhibit market activity in ARC common stock and could prevent or delay a change
in control transaction. ARCs
charter and bylaws, the Partnerships partnership agreement and Maryland law
contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control or
other transaction that might involve a premium price for ARC common stock or
otherwise be in the best interest of its stockholders, including 28 supermajority vote and cause requirements for removal of
directors and advance notice requirements for director nominations and
stockholder proposals. Pursuant to
the provisions of ARCs charter, no individual, other than Mr. Gerald J.
Ford and certain affiliated parties, may beneficially own more than 7.3% (in
value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding
shares of ARC common stock or more than 7.3% in value of our outstanding shares
of ARCs capital stock. These restrictions on transferability and ownership
will not apply if the board of directors determines that it is no longer in ARCs
best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could
delay, defer or prevent a change of control or other transaction that might
involve a premium price for ARC common stock or otherwise be in the best
interest of its stockholders. ARCs board of directors has the power to issue additional
shares of stock in a manner that may not be in your best interests. ARCs
charter authorizes the board of directors to amend the charter wn;font-size:10.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt 6.0pt;text-indent:20.0pt;">In-Community Retail Home Sales and
Consumer Financing Initiative. Our retail home sales
business consists of the sales of manufactured homes in our communities to
residents and prospective residents at reasonable prices. Through our consumer
financing initiative, we provide loans to qualified residents and prospective
residents to facilitate purchases of manufactured homes located in our
communities. It is our practice to acquire additional manufactured home
inventory for sale in coordination with the sale of our existing inventory. The
manufactured housing industry represents a meaningful portion of the U.S.
housing market. In 2000, there were an estimated 22 million people living
in manufactured homes in the United States. The manufactured housing industry
is primarily focused on providing affordable housing to moderate-income
customers. A manufactured home is a single-family house constructed
entirely in a factory rather than at a homesite, with generally the same
materials found in site-built homes and in conformity with federal
construction and safety standards. Each
homeowner in a manufactured home community leases a homesite from the owner of
the community. The manufactured home community owner owns the underlying land,
utility connections, streets, lighting, driveways, common area amenities and
other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community
guidelines that govern resident conduct and maintenance of the community. Generally,
each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of their home and upkeep of
their leased site. We believe that manufactured home communities have several
characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared to some
other types of real estate, particularly multi-family real estate,
including the following: · significant barriers to the
entry of new manufactured home communities into the market; · large and growing
demographic group of potential customers; 90 · comparatively stable
resident base; · fragmented ownership of
communities; · comparatively low recurring
capital requirements; · improved economies of scale
in operation of multiple sites; and · affordable homeowner
lifestyle. The
manufactured housing industry faces a challenging operating environment, which
has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of
activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies.
According to Manufactured Housing Institute, or MHI, industry shipments (a
measure of manufacturers home production and wholesale sales) have declined
from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this dramatic decline
in production and sales is largely the result of an oversupply of consumer
credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing,
retail and finance sectors of the industry. Current industry conditions are
further exacerbated by low mortgage interest rates and less stringent credit
requirements for the purchase of entry-level site built homes, thereby
reducing the price competitiveness of manufactured housing. We expect industry conditions to remain difficult for the
foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the
United States and a continued shortage of available consumer financing for
manufactured home buyers. We anticipate that demand for manufactured housing
and manufactured home communities will improve if home mortgage interest rates
return to higher historical levels, which should reduce the pricing
differential between home mortgage interest rates and interest rates for
financing the purchase of a manufactured home. On September 21,
2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARCs board of
directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARCs board of
directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F.
Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott
D. Jackson, ARCs former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the
position of Vice Chairman of ARCs board of directors and would direct ARCs
sales of communities. On that
date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625
dividend on ARCs Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a
distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnerships Series C preferred
partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30,
2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARCs board of directors
also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARCs common stock and the quarterly
distribution on the Partnerships common partnership units, in each case, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Also on
September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors authorized the sale of
approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming all
79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities
that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy
objectives. In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage
facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended,
the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at
September 30, 2005). See Description of Other IndebtednessRevolving Credit
Mortgage Facility Due 2006 for a further discussion of this amendment. In October
2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity
from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the
limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal
to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible 91 manufactured housing unithout
stockholder approval to increase the total number of authorized shares of stock
or the number of shares of stock of any class or series and issue additional
common stock, preferred stock or special voting stock. In addition, ARCs board
of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or
preferred stock and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the
classified or reclassified shares. Although the board of directors has no
intention to do so at the present time, it could issue additional shares of our
special voting stock or establish a series of preferred stock that could have
the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or other
transaction that might involve a premium price for ARC common stock or
otherwise be in the best interest of its stockholders. Our rights and the rights of ARCs stockholders to take
action against its directors and officers are limited. Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no
liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good
faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests
and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would
use under similar circumstances. In addition, ARCs charter eliminates its
directors and officers liability to ARC and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit
in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established
by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. ARCs bylaws
require it to indemnify its directors and officers for liability resulting from
actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law. As a result, ARC and its stockholders may have more limited
rights against its directors and officers than might otherwise exist under
common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred
by ARCs directors and officers. Dividends payable by REITs do not generally qualify for the
reduced tax rates on qualified dividends. Until tax
years beginning after December 31, 2008, certain qualified dividends
payable to individual U.S. stockholders (as such term is defined under Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations below) are taxed at 15%. Generally,
dividends payable by REITs will not constitute qualified dividends eligible for
the reduced rates. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate
dividends could cause stockholders who are individuals to perceive investments
in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stock of
non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the
market price of the stock of REITs, including ARC common stock. In addition, the relative attractiveness of investment in
real estate in general may be adversely affected by the newly favorable tax
treatment given to corporate dividends, which could negatively affect the value
of our properties. 29 Possible legislative or other actions affecting REITs could
adversely affect ARCs stockholders. The rules dealing with federal income taxation are
constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by
the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, and the U.S. Treasury Department.
Changes to the tax law (which changes may have retroactive application) could
adversely affect ARCs stockholders. We cannot predict whether, when, in what
forms, or with what effective dates, the tax laws applicable to ARC or its
stockholders will be changed. Risks
Related to Ownership of the Notes Our Markets The table below provides summary
information on our portfolio as of June 30, 2005 for our 20 largest
markets: Market(1) The notes are effectively subordinated to the Partnerships
existing and future secured indebtedness. The notes represent the Partnerships general obligations. Accordingly,
holders of the Partnerships secured indebtedness will have claims that are
superior to the claims of holders of the notes to the extent of the value of
the assets securing that other indebtedness. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro
forma basis, after giving effect to ARCs proposed sale of up to 79 communities
announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes, the Partnership
had approximately $1,049.3 million
of outstanding indebtedness, consisting of $926.9 million secured
indebtedness, as well as the notes and $25.8 million in trust preferred
securities which were each unsecured. See Affordable Residential Communities
LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data for a discussion of the anticipated effect
on the Partnership and ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes. In the
event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution, the assets which serve as
collateral for any secured indebtedness will be available to satisfy the
obligations under the secured indebtedness before any payments are made on the
notes. The terms of the indenture governing the notes do not prohibit the
Partnership from incurring future indebtedness. The notes are effectively subordinated to liabilities of
the Partnerships subsidiaries. The notes are not guaranteed by the Partnerships
subsidiaries and therefore the notes will be effectively subordinated to all
indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries. In the event of a
bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of a subsidiary, following payment by
the subsidiary of its liabilities, the subsidiary may not have sufficient
assets to make payments to the Partnership. As of June 30, 2005, on a pro
forma basis, the Partnerships subsidiaries had an aggregate of $1,023.5
million of existing indebtedness. The terms of the indenture governing the
notes do not prohibit the Partnerships subsidiaries from incurring future
indebtedness. There are no restrictive covenants in the indenture
relating to the Partnerships ability to incur future indebtedness or complete
other financing transactions. The indenture governing the notes does not contain any
financial or operating covenants or restrictions on the payment of dividends,
the incurrence of indebtedness, transactions with affiliates, incurrence of
liens or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Partnership or any of
its subsidiaries. The Partnership therefore may incur additional indebtedness,
including secured indebtedness that would be effectively senior to the notes to
the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, or
indebtedness at the subsidiary level to which the notes would be structurally
subordinated. The Partnership cannot assure you that it will be able to generate
sufficient cash flow to pay the interest on its indebtedness, including the
notes, or that future working capital, borrowings or equity financing will be
available to pay or refinance any such indebtedness. 30 The make whole premium that may be payable upon exchange in
connection with specified fundamental changes may not adequately compensate you
for the lost option time value of your notes as a result of such fundamental
changes. If you exchange your notes in connection with a specified
fundamental change that occurs prior to August 20, 2015 we may be required
to issue you additional shares of ARC common stock as a make whole premium
(subject to our ability to elect to pay cash or a combination of cash and
shares of ARC common stock in lieu of delivering shares of ARC common stock). The
make whole payment is described under Description of NotesExchange RightsDetermination
of Make Whole Premium. While the make whole premium is designed to compensate
you for the lost option time value of your notes as a result of a specified
fundamental change, the make whole amount is only an approximation of such lost
value and may not adequately compensate you for such loss. In addition, if a
specified fundamental change occurs after August 20, 2015, there will be
no such make whole premium. Because your right to require repurchase of the notes is
limited, the market price of the notes may decline if we enter into a
transaction that is not a fundamental change under the indenture. The term fundamental change is limited and may not
include every event that might cause the market price of the notes to decline
or result in a downgrade of the credit rating of the notes. The Partnerships
obligation to repurchase the notes upon a fundamental change may not preserve
the value of the notes in the event of a highly leveraged transaction,
reorganization, merger or similar transaction. See Description of NotesRepurchase
at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change. If you hold notes, you are not entitled to any rights with
respect to the ARC common stock, but you are subject to all changes made with
respect to ARC common stock. If you hold notes, you are not entitled to any rights with
respect to the ARC common stock (including, without limitation, voting rights
and rights to receive any dividends or other distributions on ARC common stock,
if any), but you are subject to all changes affecting the ARC common stock. You
will only be entitled to rights on the ARC common stock if and when we deliver
shares of ARC common stock to you in exchange for your notes. For example, in
the event that an amendment is proposed to ARCs charter requiring stockholder
approval and the record date for determining the stockholders of record
entitled to vote on the amendment occurs prior to delivery of the ARC common
stock, you will not be entitled to vote on the amendment, although you will
nevertheless be subject to any changes in the powers, preferences or special
rights of ARC common stock. The Partnerships ability to repurchase the notes with cash
at your option or upon a repurchase event may be limited. Holders of the notes may require the Partnership to
repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at specific times and upon
the occurrence of specific circumstances involving the events described under Description
of NotesRepurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates and Description of
NotesRepurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change. The
Partnership cannot assure you that, if required, it would have sufficient cash
or other financial resources at that time or would be able to arrange financing
to pay the repurchase price of the notes in cash. The Partnerships ability to
repurchase the notes in that event may be limited by law, regulatory
authorities, the indenture, the terms of other agreements relating to the
Partnerships indebtedness and indebtedness and agreements that the Partnership
may enter into in the future which may replace, supplement or amend our
existing or future indebtedness. See Description of Other Indebtedness. 31 The exchange rate of the notes may not be adjusted for all
dilutive events. The exchange rate of the notes is subject to adjustment for
certain events including, but not limited to, the issuance of stock dividends
on ARCs common stock, the issuance of rights or warrants, subdivisions,
combinations, distributions of capital stock, indebtedness or assets, cash
dividends and certain tender or exchange offers as described under Description
of NotesExchange RightsExchange Rate Adjustments. The exchange rate will not
be adjusted for other events, such as an issuance of ARC common stock for cash
or in connection with an acquisition, that may adversely affect the trading
price of the notes or ARC common stock. There can be no assurance that an event
that adversely affects the value of the notes, but does not result in an
adjustment to the exchange rate, will not occur. You should consider the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of owning the notes. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exchange of
the notes into a combination of ARC common stock and cash is uncertain. You are
urged to consult your tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income
tax consequences resulting from the exchange of notes into a combination of
cash and common stock. A discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences
of ownership of the notes is contained in this prospectus under the heading Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. An active trading market for the notes may not develop. The notes constitute a new issue of securities for which
there is no established trading market. The notes currently trade on the PORTAL
Market. However, the notes sold under this prospectus will no longer be
eligible for trading on the PORTAL Market. We do not intend to list the notes
on any national or other securities exchange, or on the Nasdaq National Market.
As a result, an active trading market for the notes may not develop. If an
active trading market does not develop or is not maintained, the market price
and liquidity of the notes may be adversely affected. In that case, you may not
be able to sell your notes at a particular time or you may not be able to sell
your notes at a favorable price. Future trading prices of the notes will depend
on many factors, including: · our operating and financial
condition; · the interest of securities
dealers in making a market; and · the market for similar
securities. If a trading market does not develop, you may be required
to hold the notes to maturity unless you exchange them for shares of ARC common
stock or cash. We expect that the trading price of the notes will be
significantly affected by the trading price of ARC common stock. Because the notes are exchangeable into shares of ARC
common stock, volatility or depressed prices for ARC common stock could have a
similar effect on the trading price of the notes and could limit the amount of
cash payable upon exchange of the notes. This may result in greater volatility
in the trading price of the notes than would be expected for any
non-exchangeable debt securities we may issue. Holders who receive ARC common
stock upon exchange of the notes will also be subject to the risk of volatility
and depressed prices of ARC common stock. For information on the trading prices
of ARC common stock see Price Range of ARC Common Stock. Number Percentage Occupancy Rental Income Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 7,223 11.5 % 82.7 % $ 349 Atlanta, GA 4,969 7.9 % 89.2 % 349 Salt Lake City, UT 3,792 An adverse rating of the notes may cause their trading
price to fall. If a rating
agency rates the notes, it may assign a rating that is lower than investors
expectations. Rating agencies also may lower ratings on the notes in the
future. If rating agencies assign a lower-than-expected rating or
reduce, or indicate that they may reduce, their ratings in the future, the
trading price of the notes could significantly decline. If we elect to satisfy our exchange obligation to holders
by paying the cash value of the ARC common stock into which the notes are
exchangeable or by a combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock, upon
exchange of all or a portion of their notes, holders may not receive any shares
of ARC common stock, or they might receive fewer shares of ARC common stock
relative to the exchange value of the notes. In addition, there will be a
significant delay in settlement, and because the amount of cash and/or ARC
common stock that a holder will receive in these circumstances will be based on
the sales price of ARC common stock for an extended period between the exchange
date and settlement date, holders will bear the market risk with respect to the
market price of ARC common stock for such extended period. Finally, our
liquidity may be reduced to the extent that we choose to deliver cash rather
than shares of ARC common stock upon exchange of the notes. The failure of our results to meet the estimates of market
analysis could adversely affect the trading price of the notes and ARC common
stock. We have not in the past and do not intend to provide
estimates of our future fin"padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
6.0 % 92.1 % The accounting treatment of the notes may impact the
volatility of ARC common stock. If certain conversion features of the notes result in those
features being considered a derivative embedded in the notes, the associated
accounting treatment may cause our non-cash earnings to become more
volatile from period to period. Volatility in our earnings may, in turn, affect
the trading price of ARC common stock and the notes. Risks Related to the Securities
Markets and Ownership of ARC Common Stock Additional issuances of equity securities by ARC and
exchange of the notes for ARC common stock will dilute the ownership interest
of ARCs existing stockholders, including former note holders who had
previously exchanged their notes for common stock. The
exchange of some or all of the notes will dilute the ownership interests of
ARCs existing stockholders, including former note holders who had previously
exchanged their notes for common stock. Any sales in the public market of the
ARC common stock issuable upon such exchange could adversely affect prevailing
trading price of ARC common stock. In addition, the existence of the notes may
encourage short selling by market participants because the exchange of the
notes could depress the price of ARC common stock. 348 Front Range of CO 3,287 5.2 33 ARCs recent cash distributions to its common and preferred
stockholders have exceeded ARCs operating cash flows. For the
12 months ended December 31, 2004, and the six months ended
June 30, 2005, ARCs annual cash distribution to its common stockholders
and quarterly distributions to its preferred stockholders and the Partnerships
distributions to its limited partners have exceeded our operating cash flows.
We funded these distributions from a combination of operating cash flows, cash
generated from senior fixed and variable rate mortgage debt incurred in
connection with the completion of the IPO of ARC in February 2004, other
borrowings, and sales of assets. On May 23, 2005, ARC announced that its
board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.1875 per share of
ARC common stock payable to stockholders of record on June 30, 2005. Unless operating cash flows increase substantially, we will
be required to (1) reduce or eliminate the cash distributions or
(2) fund future cash distributions to ARCs stockholders or the
Partnerships limited partners from other borrowings, sales of some of our
properties, and/or other available financing sources or ARC will have to reduce
such distributions. If we use working capital or proceeds from such other
borrowings, sales of some of ARCs properties, or other avalign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">
% 89.1 % 429 Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, MO-KS 2,428 3.9 % 89.6 % 285 An increase in interest rates may have an adverse effect on
the price of ARC common stock. One of the factors that may influence the price of ARC
common stock in the public market will be the annual distributions to
stockholders relative to the prevailing market price of ARC common stock. An
increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative
to historical rates, could lead current and prospective holders of ARC common
stock to generally expect a higher dividend yield on their investments,
including such stock. Under such circumstances, maintaining, decreasing or not
appropriately increasing our current level of dividends on ARC common stock
would likely adversely affect the market price for ARC common stock and
potentially the market price of the notes. ARCs common stock price may experience substantial volatility,
which may affect your ability, following any exchange, to sell ARC common stock
at an advantageous price and could impact the market price, if any, of the
notes. The market price of ARC common stock has been and may
continue to be volatile. For example, the market price of ARC common stock on
the New York Stock Exchange has fluctuated for the period from October 21, 2004 to October 21, 2005 between $15.12 per share and $9.33 per share and may continue to
fluctuate. Therefore, the volatility may affect your ability to sell ARC common
stock at an advantageous price. In addition, this may result in greater
volatility in the market price, if any, of the notes than would be expected for
non-exchangeable debt securities. Market price fluctuations in ARC common stock
may be due to acquisitions, dispositions or other material public
announcements, including those regarding dividends or changes in management,
along with a variety of additional factors including, without limitation, other
risks identified in Risk Factors and Special Note Regarding Forward-looking
Statements. In addition, the stock markets in general, including the New York
Stock Exchange, recently have experienced extreme price and trading
fluctuations. These fluctuations have resulted in volatility in the market
prices of securities that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to
changes in operating 34 performance. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of ARC common stock, and the
market price of the notes. We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the
notes or the underlying common stock by selling securityholders. RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES The following financial ratios measure our ability to repay
interest from our earnings. Earnings were computed by adding fixed charges (adjusted
for capitalized interest) to net loss from continuing operations. Fixed charges
consist of interest costs and amortization of debt issuance costs. Pro forma
results reflect the effect of the discontinued operations resulting from the
proposed sale of the 79 communities, (in thousands). Pro Forma Pro Forma
Jacksonville, FL 2,256 3.6 % 88.2 % 349 Wichita, KS 2,178 3.5 % Six Months
66.7 % 273 Orlando, FL 1,986 3.2 % 89.8 % 368 St. Louis, MO-IL 1,912 3.0 % 81.0 % 290 Oklahoma City, OK 1,887 3.0 % 78.5 % 289 Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC Year Ended Ended Ended Year Ended June 30, June 30, December 31, December 31, 2005 2005 2004 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Earnings: 1,398 2.2 % 69.5 % 270 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 1,385
Net loss from continuing operations 2.2 % 86.8 % 265 Inland Empire, CA 1,223 $ (27,523 ) $ (30,384 ) $ (83,527 ) $ (84,913 ) $ (43,267 ) $
1.9 % 95.1 % 397 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 1,212 1.9 % 85.6 % 326 Charleston-North Charleston, SC (48,109 ) $ (13,949 ) $ (13,975 ) Add: 1,179 1.9 % 81.8 % 251 Southeast FL 1,125 1.8 % 96.0 % 495 Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 1,094 1.7 % 85.7 % 340 Nashville, TN 1,071 1.7 % Fixed charges 36,364 72.8 % 291 Sioux City, IA-NE 36,364 67,159 67,159 62,041 48,164 16,818 14,422 Less capitalized interest (485 ) 994 1.6 % 79.8 % 290 Syracuse, NY 931 1.5 % (485 ) (3,070 ) (3,070 ) Add amortization of capitalized interest 160 64.7 % 340 Subtotal: Top 20 Markets 43,530 131 131
69.2 % Net loss from continuing operations plus fixed
charges adjusted for capitalized interest 8,516 5,655 (19,307 ) (20,693 ) 18,774 84.5 % 339 All Other Markets 2,869 447 Fixed
charges:
19,412 30.8 % 84.4 % 297 Total
Homesites/Weighted Average Occupancy Interest expense (including interest in discontinued
operations) 32,074 32,074 62,942 100.0 % 84.5 % $ 326 (1) Markets
are defined by our management. (2) Rental
income is defined as homeowner lot rental income, home renter lot and home
rental income and other rental income reduced by move-in bonuses and rent
concessions. Rental income does not include utility and other income. After taking into account
the proposed sale of the 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005,
on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia,
with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total
homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro
Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data for a
further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of
these sales and the sale of the notes. 92 As of June 30, 2005, our portfolio consisted of 315
manufactured home communities (net of one community classified as discontinued
operations) comprising approximately 62,942 homesites located in 27 states
and 67 markets, primarily oriented toward all-age living. As of June 30, 2005, our communities had an occupancy
rate of 84.5% and the average
monthly rental income per occupied homesite was $326. Leases for homeowners are
generally month-to-month, or in limited cases year-to-year, and require
security deposits. In the case of our residents renting homes from us, lease
terms are typically one year, and require a security deposit. Under our lease
with option to purchase program, residents enter into a long term lease, typically
24 to 84 months, pay a security deposit and option fee and commit to monthly
payments creditable to their down payment upon purchase of the home. We commit
to the price of the home upon purchase at the end of the lease. 93 The following table sets forth
certain information regarding our communities, including the 79 communities we
have identified as held for sale, arranged from our largest to smallest market,
as of June 30, 2005. Rental income includes homeowner rental income and
home renter rental income reduced by move in bonuses and rent concessions. &nbsfont-size:8.0pt;">58,011 58,011 58,256 43,887 14,714 13,067 Capitalized
interest
485 485 3,070 Rental Income Occupancy Per Occupied Number of June 30, Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State
3,070 Homesites 2005
Amortization of debt issuance 3,772 Per Month Dallas/Ft.
Worth, Texas
3,772
Meadow Glen TX 5,952 5,952 3,213 4,129 1,896 1,212 Interest factor included in rental expense(1) 33 33 126 126 572 148 208 143 Total fixed charges 36,364 36,364 67,159 409 64.8 % $ 289 Brookside Village TX
67,159 62,041 394 79.7 % 300 Southfork
48,164 16,818 14,422 Deficiency in achieving a 1:1 coverage ratio $ 27,848 $ 30,709 $ 86,466 $ 87,852 $ 43,267 TX 323 92.9 % 380 Creekside TX 308 86.7 % 311 $ 48,109 $ Village North TX 289 90.7 % 393 Summit Oaks TX 278 13,949 $ 13,975 (1) Equal
to 1¤3
of rent expense, which is an approximation of the interest portion of rent
expense. 35 PRICE RANGE OF ARC COMMON STOCK The shares of ARC common stock are listed and traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ARC. ARCs common stock began
trading on February 18, 2004, following its IPO. Set forth below, for the
applicable periods indicated, are the high and low closing sale prices per
share of ARC common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. High Low
83.1 % 361 Chalet City TX First quarter $ 18.98 $ 18.29 Second quarter &nbsadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.9pt;">
257 79.8 % 331 $ 18.67 $ 14.57 Third quarter $ 16.94 $ 14.60 Fourth quarter $ 14.95 $ Twin Parks ;">
12.48 2005 TX 247 76.1 % 438 Lakewood * First quarter $ 14.03 $ 11.85 Second quarter $ 13.62 $ 12.00 Third quarter TX 224 82.1 % 424 Quail Run TX $ 13.65 $ 9.84 Fourth
quarter (through October 21,
2005) $ 10.10 $ 9.48 On October 21,
2005, the last reported closing sale price of ARC common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange was $9.81 per
share. 36 The following table sets forth the capitalization of the
Partnership as of June 30, 2005 (in thousands): · on a historical actual
basis; and · on a pro forma basis to reflect the sale of the notes and
the use of proceeds therefrom, and the debt reclassification to liabilities
related to assets held for sale as a result of the community sales. Historical Offering Discontinued Pro Forma Cash 78.6 % 364 Willow Terrace TX 214 65.4 % $ 19,616 $ 409 Arlington Lakeside 92,519 $ $ 112,135 Long-term debt:
TX 218 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009 $ 98,926 $ $ (1yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
88.1 % 342 Mesquite Meadows
) $ 83,067 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 302,325 (26,047 ) 276,278 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 211,921 TX 205 88.3 % 309 Amber Village TX 204 60.3 % 359 Highland Acres (22,399 ) 189,522 Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031 153,074 (31,433 ) 121,641 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006(1) 140,468 (31,948 ) 108,520 Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2006 58,764 58,764 Trust preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC) 25,780 25,780 Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2025 96,600 96,600 Consumer finance facility due 2008 9,369 9,369 Lease receivable facility due 2007 42,100 42,100 Floorplan line of credit due 2007 43,945 (8,578 ) 35,367 Other loans 2,332 2,332 Total debt 1,089,004 96,600 (136,264 ) 1,049,340 Capital: TX 197 88.3 % 382 Eagle Ridge TX 188 Partners capital Preferred partnership units 144,250 144,250 94.7 % 368 Denton Falls TX 186 61.3 % 367 Terrell Crossing * TX Common partnership units: 186 73.7 % 424 General partner 486,112 (32,908 ) 453,204 <7pt;">
Rolling Hills TX
Limited partners 26,298 (1,816 ) 24,482 Total partners capital 656,660 &2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 183 87.4 (34,724 ) 621,936 Total capitalization % 327 Dynamic TX 156 85.9 % 340
$ 1,745,664 $ 96,600 $ (170,988 ) $ 1,671,276 (1) The
senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month
periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions. 37 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP SELECTED CONSOLIDATED
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA As used in
this section, the terms we, 10.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Cottonwood Grove The
following table shows our selected consolidated historical and pro forma financial
data for the periods indicated. You should read our selected consolidated historical
and pro forma financial data, together with the notes thereto, in conjunction
with the more detailed information contained in our financial statements and
related notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations included in this prospectus. Our
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 and
2003 and our consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 have been derived from our audited historical financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical consolidated
balance sheet information as of June 30, 2005 and our consolidated
statement of operations information for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
In the opinion of our management, our historical consolidated balance sheet and
statement of operations as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively, include all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the information set forth
therein. Our results of operations for the interim period ended June 30,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of the result to be obtained for the full
fiscal year. Our
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 have
been derived from the unaudited pro forma financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet data reflects adjustments to our historical financial data to give effect
to the proposed sale of 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005, as
well as the sale of our 71¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes
due 2025, as if the sale of all communities and the sale of the notes had both
occurred on June 30, 2005. Our pro forma condensed consolidated statements
of operations data reflects adjustments to our historical financial data to
give effect to the discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of
the 79 communities, as if the sales had occurred at the beginning of the
periods presented. We have based our unaudited pro forma adjustments upon available
information and assumptions that we consider reasonable. Our unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial information is not necessarily
indicative of what our actual financial position or results of operations would
have been as of the date and for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to
represent our future financial position or results of operations. 38 Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro Forma Financial
Data (in
thousands, except per unit data) Pro Forma Six Months Ended Pro Forma June 30, June 30, December 31, Year Ended December 31,
TX 151 94.0 % 428 Mesquite Ridge TX 144 86.1 % 334 Silver Leaf TX 145 89.7 % 259 Willow Springs TX 139 86.3 % 322 Aledo TX 139 97.1 % 2005 2005 2004(3) 2004 2004(3) 2003 2002(1)
294 Golden Triangle TX 138 97.1 % 430 Dynamic II TX 136 2001 2000 (unaudited) (unaudited) face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 95.6 % 359 Shadow Mountain
(unaudited) (unaudited) TX 129 74.4 % 277 "7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">
Statement of Operations Data:
El Lago TX 122 90.2 % 348 Revenue Rental income $ 83,142 Mesquite Green TX 121 91.7 % 293 Hampton Acres TX 119 80.7 % 422 Sunset Village * TX 110 81.8 % $ 102,224 $ 86,210 $ 151,431 $ 187,267 $ 125,915 $ 92,610 $ 35,024 $ 22,605 325 Kimberly at Creekside TX 107 89.7 % 297 Oak Park Village TX 94 &nb
Sales of manufactured homes 20,957 26,278 2,789 12,275 15,221 21,681 31,942 Utility and other income 9,231 11,481 9,097 15,746
91.5 % 410 94 20,065 15,599 11,942 2,525 1,370 Net consumer finance interest income (expense) 205 205 (40 ) (102 ) 104 Total revenue 113,535 140,188 98,056 179,350 222,657 163,195 Rental Income
Occupancy Per Occupied Number of June 30, Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 2005 Per Month Shady
Creek TX 95 75.8 % $ 332
136,494 37,549 23,975 Expenses Creekside Estates TX 92 90.2
% 340 Hidden Oaks Property operations TX 87 81.6 % 326
31,177 40,363 30,234 * TX 79 58,823 75,150 44,295 33,341 10,742 6,095 73.4 %
Real estate taxes 7,027 8,698 7,390 13,327 16,621 10,247 6,633 2,432 1,373 Cost of manufactured homes sold 18,699 24,405 2,365 14,692 18,267 18,357 25,826 Retail home sales, finance, insurance and other
operations 7,317 227 Mulberry Heights 7,317 2,079 8,198 8,198 7,382 8,582 Property management 4,759 4,759 3,054 7,127 7,127 5,527 4,105 2,491 2,436 General and administrative 11,618 11,618 19,099 67 89.6 % 348 Zoppe's TX 29,361 29,361 16,855
60 85.0 % 201 El Lago II 9,047 7,173 Initial public offering costs
TX 59 84.7 % 360 Dallas/Ft.
Worth, Texas 7,223 82.7 % $ 4,417 4,417 4,417
349 Atlanta, Georgia Early termination of debt Hunter Ridge GA 850 13,427 16,685 16,685 Depreciation and amortization 33,081 84.8 % $ 350 Landmark Village GA 509 84.9 % 338 Shadowood GA 507 92.9 % 361 42,255 32,152 57,761 72,014 46,467 37,058 14,943
Riverdale (Colonial Coach) 9,974 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 3,358 3,591 1,385 Goodwill impairment 863 863 GA 436 90.1 % 336 Lamplighter Village GA
13,557 430 93.3 % Interest expense 28,007 31,817 27,209 49,862 56,892 381 Stone Mountain
57,386 43,804 14,714 13,067 Total expenses 141,685 GA 354 83.6 %
171,232 141,426 383 Castlewood Estates GA 300 97.7 % 324 Woodlands of Kennesaw 264,474 309,186 207,901 185,993 54,369 40,118 Interest income (627 ) (660 ) (792 ) (1,597 ) (1,616 ) (1,439 ) (1,390 ) (2,871 ) (2,168 ) Net loss from continuing operations (27,523 ) (30,384 GA 267 89.9 % 390 Smoke Creek GA 264
) (42,578 ) (83,527 )
83.3 % 353 Four Seasons GA ) (43,267 ) (48,109 ) (13,949 ) (13,975 ) Income (loss) from discontinued operations 215 88.4 % 313 Marnelle GA 201 95.5 % 345 Friendly Village
1,000 795 GA 203 98.0 % 1,915 31 1,040 819 (149 376 Plantation Estates GA 130 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations (678 ) 93.1 % 309 Golden Valley (8,549 ) 3,333 Net loss (30,062 ) GA ) (91,547 ) (39,903 ) (47,069 ) (13,130 ) (14,124 ) Preferred unit distributions (5,942 ) (5,942 ) (3,810 )
126 73.8 % 329 Lakeside GA (9,752 ) (9,752 ) 102 92.2 % 261 Net loss attributable to common unitholders
Jonesboro (Atlanta Meadows) GA 75 $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) $ (13,130 ) $ (14,124 ) Net loss attributable to common unitholders from
continuing operations $ (33,465 ) $ 100.0 % 282 Atlanta,
GeorgiaTotal/Weighted Average 4,969 89.2 % $ 349 Salt Lake
City, Utah (93,279 ) Net loss per common partnership unit from continuing
operations $ (0.77 ) $ (0.84 ) $ (1.24 ) $ (2.31 )
Camelot UT in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$ (2.34 ) $ (2.20 ) $ (2.94 ) $ (1.54 ) $ (2.17 ) Income (loss) per common partnership unit from
discontinued operations 379 99.5 % $ 385 Country Club Mobile Estates
0.01 UT 323 0.02 99.1 % 372 Crescentwood Village UT 273 97.8 (0.17 ) 0.17 0.06 0.09 (0.02 ) Net loss per common partnership unit $ (0.83 )
% 368 &nyle="line-height:7.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$ (1.22 ) $ (2.51 ) $ (2.03 Windsor Mobile Estates UT
) 249 97.6 % 384 Evergreen Village UT 237 75.9 % 323 Riverdale UT 210 96.2 % 321 Villa West UT 211 94.3 % (2.88 ) $ (1.45 ) $ (2.19 ) Weighted average units outstanding 43,262 43,262 37,531 40,413 40,413 19,699 16,353 Lakeview Estates UT
9,062 6,441 Cash Flow Data: 209 98.6 % 353 Sunset Vista UT 204 80.4 % 352 Riverside UT 200 97.5 % 455 Sundown UT 194 93.3 % 339 Viking Villa UT 191 ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:30.45pt;">
& 94.2 % 273 Washington Mobile Estates UT Net cash flow provided by (used in): 0pt;width:3.5pt;">
186 89.2 %
321 Overpass Point MHC UT Operating activities 175 68.0 % 276 Brookside UT $ 989 $ 18,971 $ 27,034 $ 10,689 $ 14,281 $ 6,626 $ 170 91.2 % 350 95 Rental Income
(3,177 ) Investing activities (39,170 ) (576,814 ) (607,615 ) (47,693 ) (137,473 ) (104,638 ) (91,185 ) Financing activities 17,995 578,954 593,757 25,389 137,787 84,340 111,976 Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Western
Mobile Estates UT 143 79.7 % $ 322 Willow Creek Estates
UT 137 92.7 %
Funds from operations available to common partnership unitholders(2) $ 2,211 $ 2,211 $ (13,787 ) $ (24,818 ) $ (24,818 ) $ 1,495 $ (13,202 ) $ 2,216 $ (3,296 ) EBITDA, as adjusted(2) 169 Kopper View MHC UT 61 96.7 % 340 Redwood Village UT 40 97.5 32,938 43,028 29,418 372 Salt Lake
City, UtahTotal/Weighted Average
43,405 63,516 60,532 3,792 92.1 % $ 348 12,837 6,898 Cash Distributions Declared Per Unit: Front Range
of Colorado
Series A preferred unit distributions $ 1.03 $ 0.93 $ 1.97 $ $ $ $ Series B and C preferred unit distributions 0.78 0.78 Common unit distributions Harmony Road CO 486 89.1 % $ 425 Stoneybrook CO 426 69.0 % 399 0.50 0.46 1.09 39 Pro Forma June 30, December 31, 2005 2005 2004(3) Wikiup CO 339 96.8 % 464
2003 2002(1) Villa West CO 331 89.1 % 365 The Meadows CO 303 2001 2000 (unaudited) (unaudited) Balance sheet data (at period end): Rental and
other property, net $1,294,134 $ 1,587,040 $ 1,532,780 $ 863,515 89.1 % 484 Mountainside Estates CO 227 $ 854,445 $ 335,387 $ 260,161 Cash and
cash equivalents 89.9 % 498 Thornton Estates
112,135 19,616 39,802 26,626 38,241 23,668 37,340 Loan
reserves and restricted cash 35,411 35,453 31,019 CO 208 98.6 % 453 Countryside CO 173 92.5 % 332 Inspiration Valley CO 139 89.2 % 488 Pleasant Grove 46,083 52,710 11,981 19,350 Total
assets 1,866,662 1,804,786 1,813,232 CO 112 89.3 % 423 Loveland
1,126,069 1,136,737 429,979 343,175 Notes
payable and preferred interest 1,049,340 1,089,004 1,001,622 773,394 736,819 238,034 186,465 Total
liabilities 1,244,726 1,148,126 1,097,293 817,852 788,617 271,143 204,908 Partners
capital 621,936 656,660 715,939 308,217 348,120 158,836 138,267 Other Data (at period end): CO 113 96.5 % Total
communities 237 315 315 199
404 Sheridan 209 83 63 Total
homesites 49,648 62,942 63,661 37,552 CO 111 91.9 % 475 Grand Meadow 36,805 15,941 11,861 Occupancy 86.3 % 84.5 % 81.5 % 85.7 % 89.9 % 90.7 % 88.7 % (1) ize="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> CO 104 Financial
data for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflects the effects of ARCs
reorganization from May 2, 2002, the date of completion of the
reorganization, through period end. We accounted for the reorganization under
the purchase method of accounting. (2) Investors in
and analysts following the real estate industry use funds from operations, or
FFO, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or
EBITDA, as adjusted, as supplemental performance measures. While we believe
that net income (as defined in GAAP) is the most appropriate measure, we also
believe that FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, are widely used by and relevant to
investors, analysts and lenders and are appropriate supplemental measures. FFO
reflects the assumption that real estate values rise or fall with market
conditions and principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP depreciation and
amortization of real estate assets. In addition, FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted,
are commonly used by the Company in various ratios, pricing multiples/yields
and returns and valuation calculations used to measure financial position,
performance and value. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as net income, computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, excluding gains (or losses)
from sales of property, plus rental property depreciation and amortization, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Industry analysts consider FFO to be an
appropriate supplemental measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT
primarily because the computation of FFO excludes historical cost depreciation
as an expense and thereby facilitates the comparison of REITs which have
different cost bases in their assets. Historical cost accounting for real
estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets
diminishes predictably over time, whereas real estate values have instead
historically risen or fallen based upon market conditions. FFO does not
represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and is a supplemental
measure of performance that does not replace net income as a measure of
performance or net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of
liquidity. In addition, FFO is not intended as a measure of a REITs ability to
meet debt principal repayments and other cash requirements, nor as a measure of
working capital. Please see the Reconciliation of Net Income to Funds from
Operations set forth below. EBITDA, as adjusted is defined as net loss attributable to
common partnership unitholders adjusted to exclude preferred stock distributions,
income from discontinued operations, interest income, interest expense,
depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, and early termination of
debt expenses. FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, do not represent cash
generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and are not
necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs, including the
repayment of principal on indebtedness and payment of dividends and
distributions. FFO and EBITDA, as adjusted, should not be considered as
substt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 100.0 % (3) Financial
data for the year ended 2004 reflects the effects of (a) the ARC IPO,
financing transactions and Hometown Communities Acquisition that we completed
on February 18, 2004; and (b) the acquisition of the D.A.M.
communities we acquired on June 30, 2004 and other community acquisitions. 40 The following table presents the
reconciliation of net loss from continuing operations computed in accordance
with GAAP to FFO available to common partnership unitholders (in thousands). Pro Forma Pro Forma Mobile Gardens CO
100 93.0 % 474 Six Months Year Ended Six Months Ended Ended
Shady Lane CO 64 90.6 % 355 Commerce Heights CO 51 98.0 % 383 Front
Range of ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 3,287 89.1 Year Ended December 31, 2005 2005 2004(1) 2004(1)(2) 2004(1)(2) 2003(3) 2002(4) 2001 2000 Reconcilation of FFO: Net loss from continuing operations $ % $ 429 Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas (27,523 ) $ (30,384 ) $ (42,578 ) $ (83,527 ) $ (84,913 ) $ (43,267
Springdale Lake ) $ (48,109 ) $ (13,949 ) $ (13,975 ) Plus: MO 441 88.7 % $ 292
River Oaks * KS 397 80.9 % 279 Northland MO 33,081 281 98.9 % 285 Ridgewood Estates KS 277 89.9 % 271 Easy Living KS 261 96.2 % 42,255 32,152 57,761 72,014 46,467 37,058 14,943 9,974 Incman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 293 Meadowood KS 250 (1,861 ) 1,000 795 529 1,915
91.2 % 255 Harper Woods 31 1,040 819 (149 ) KS 9,179 5 1,825 17,387 3,134 2,589 1,957 2,536 2,247 Less:
140 88.6 % 322 Shawnee Hills * KS 109 73.4 % 298 Pine Hills Amort0pt;">
KS 93 90.3 (3,772 ) (3,772 ) (1,722 ) (5,952 ) (5,952 % 285 Riverside KS 93 (3,213 ) (4,129 ) (1,896 ) (1,212 )
97.8 % 285 Brittany Place Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and
vehicles (951 ) (951 ) (449 ) (1,264 ) (1,264 ) (1,112 ) (1,019 ) (237 ) (181 FFO 8,153 8,153 (9,977 ) (15,066 ) (15,066 ) 1,495 (13,202 ) 2,216 (3,296 ) Less preferred unit distributions (5,942 ) (5,942 ) (3,810 KS 86 91.9 % ) (9,752 ) 305 Kansas
City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas (9,752 ) - FFO available to $ 2,211 $ 2,428 89.6 % $ 285 Jacksonville,
Florida Portside $ (13,787 ) $ (24,818 ) $ (24,818 ) $ 1,495 $ (13,202
FL 928 96.8 % $ 335 CV-Jacksonville FL 643 86.3 % 361 Ortega Village FL 284 ) $ 2,216 $ (3,296 ) (1) FFO
for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31,
2004 (actual and pro forma) includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARCs
IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition. (2) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (actual and pro forma) includes
charges for the following: (i) retail losses of $11.2 million related
to sales of older vacant homes sold during the fourth quarter at discounts to
their original costs and marketing and promotion costs both incurred to drive
occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic marketing initiative and
reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million
of impairment charges related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in
2005 at prices less than their carrying value in order to continue to drive
occupancy in specific markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our
rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million of goodwill impairment
related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million of severance
costs primarily related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief
operating officer; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges
related to three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to
property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third
quarter in the Southeast United States. (3) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of
$1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and
a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space
and $337,000 in executive severance. (4) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the
reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including
$1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of
unamortized loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write
off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses. For more
details001pt;text-align:right;"> 73.9 % 333 96 Rental Income , see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002. 41 The following table presents the
reconciliation of our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders
computed in accordance with GAAP to EBITDA, as adjusted (in thousands). Pro Forma Six Months Ended Pro Forma Year Ended December 31,
Per Occupied Number of Occupancy 2005(1) 2005 2004 2004(1) 2004 2003 2002 Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Deerpointe 2000
FL 212 82.1 % $ 391 Reconciliation of EBITDA: FL 127
Net loss attributable to common partnership
unitholders $ (33,465 ) $ (36,004 ) 81.9 % $ (45,593 ) $ (93,279 ) $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) $ (13,130 ) $ (14,124
394 Connie Jean FL 62 79.0 % Plus: 287 Jacksonville,
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 2,256 Preferred partnership unit distributions 88.2 % $ 349 Wichita, Kansas
5,942 5,942 3,810 9,752 9,752 (Income) loss from discontinued operations (322 The Towneship at Clifton
) (795 ) 6,634 (3,364 ) KS 538 58.4 % ) (819 ) 149 Interest expense 28,007 31,817 27,209 49,862 56,892 $ 260 Twin Oaks KS 373 43,804 14,714 13,067 Depreciation and amortization 33,081 42,255 32,152 57,761 72,014 46,467 37,058 14,943 9,974 Early termination of debt 13,427 16,685
73.5 % 258 Chisholm Creek KS 254 61.8 % 16,685 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 3,358 3,591 1,385 Goodwill impairment 863 863 13,557 Less: The Woodlands KS 243 76.1 % 290 Navajo Lake Estates KS 160 66.3 % 299 Glen Acres KS 136 68.4 % 270 Sherwood Acres KS 112 Interest income (627 ) 62.5 % (660 ) (792 ) (1,597 ) (1,616 ) (1,439 ) (1,390 ) (2,871 ) (2,168 ) EBITDA, as
adjusted $ 32,938 $ 43,028 $ 29,418 $ 43,405 $ 63,516 $ 60,532 $ 44,920 $ 12,837 $ 6,898 (1) Net loss
attributable to common partnership unitholders excludes income or loss from discontinued
operations and any gains or losses from the sale of discontinued operations. 42 SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA As used in
this section, the terms we, us, our, the Partnership refer to the
Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term ARC refers to
Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries. The
following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information of
the Partnership and ARC as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and for the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been
derived from the historical financial statements included elsewhere and
incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The pro
forma condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect adjustments to the
Partnerships and ARCs historical financial data to give effect to the
proposed sale of 79 communities announced on September 21, 200="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 315 Sleepy Hollow * KS 86 48.8 % The pro
forma condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect adjustments to the
Partnerships and ARCs historical financial data to give effect to the
discontinued operations resulting from the proposed sale of the 79 communities
as if the sales had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. The
unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and
assumptions that the Partnership and ARC consider reasonable. The unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial information is not necessarily
indicative of what the actual financial position or results of operations would
have been as of the date and for the pe valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:21.5pt;">
303 Park Avenue Estates KS 85 81.2 % 350 El Caudillo KS 67 92.5 % 287 Sunset 77 * KS 43 Affordable Residential Communities LP Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet At
June 30, 2005 (in thousands) June 30, 2005 Discontinued
52 Historical Offering Operations Pro Forma Assets Rental and other
property, net $ 1,587,040 $ $ (292,906 ) $ 1,294,134 Assets held for
sale 3,368 279,254 67.3 % 201 Audora KS 37 86.5 % 314 Sycamore Square * KS 35 40.0 % 204 282,622 Cash and cash
equivalents 19,616 92,519 112,135 Tenant notes and
other receivables, net 32,826 Wichita, KansasTotal/Weighted (488 ) 32,338 Inventory 307 (5 ) 302 Loan origination
costs, net 14,510 4,081 2,178 66.7 % $ 273 Orlando, Florida (1,782 ) 16,809 Loan reserves 35,453 (42 ) Shadow Hills 35,411 Goodwill 85,264 (15,490 ) 69,774 Lease intangibles
and customer relationships, net 16,087 (2,981 ) 13,106 Prepaid expenses
and other assets 10,315 (284 ) 10,031 Total assets $ 1,804,786 $ 96,600 $ (34,724 ) $ 1,866,662 Liabilities
and Partners Capital Notes payable $ 1,089,004 $ 96,600 $ (136,264 ) $ 1,049,340 Liabilities
related to assets held for sale FL 664 77.4 % $ 425 Siesta Lago FL 489 96.7 % 383 Chalet North FL 403 92.8 % 377 College Park FL 2,656 142,477 145,133
130 97.7 % Accounts payable
and accrued expenses 31,273 (3,261 ) 28,012 246 Carriage Court East Dividends payable 10,084 10,084 Tenant deposits
and other liabilities 15,109 (2,952 ) 12,157 Total liabilities 1,148,126 96,600 1,244,726 Partners
capital Preferred partnership
units 144,250 FL 128 99.2 % 309 Carriage Court Central FL 118 96.6 % 295 144,250 Common partnership
units: Wheel Estates FL
General partner 54 100.0 % 221 Orlando,
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 486,112 (32,908 ) 453,204 Limited partners 26,298 1,986 89.8 % $ 368 (1,816 ) 24,482
St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois Total partners
capital 656,660 (34,724 )(1) 621,936 Total liabilities and
partners capital $ 1,804,786 $ 96,600 $ (34,724 ) $ 1,866,662 (1) Reflects a
loss on the sales of certain of the 79 communities included in assets held for
sale of $34.7 million. This loss is non-recurring and therefore was excluded
from the pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations. Excludes
expected gains on sales of certain of the 79 communities which will be
recognized upon closing of the sales. 44 Affordable Residential Communities LP Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per unit
data) Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Historical Discontinued Pro Forma Revenue
Enchanted Village * IL 506 65.4 % $ 299 Mallard Lake IL 277 93.1 % 315 Country Club Manor MO Rental income $ 102,224 $ (19,082 ) $ 83,142 250 88.8 % 314 Siesta Manor
Sales of manufactured homes 26,278 (5,321 ) 20,957 Utility and other income 11,481 (2,250 ) 9,231 Net consumer finance interest income 205 205 Total revenue 140,188 (26,653 ) 113,535 Expenses Property operations 40,363 (9,186 ) 31,177 Real estate taxes 8,698 (1,671 ) 7,027 MO 192 87.5 % 286 Brookshire Village MO 202 68.8 % 251 Castle Acres IL 167 96.4 % 237 Rockview Heights MO 101 90.1 % 334 Oak Grove * Cost of manufactured homes sold 24,405 (5,706 ) 18,699 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 7,317 7,317 Property management 4,759 4,759 General and administrt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">
IL 11,618 11,618 Depreciation and amortization 42,255 73 83.6 % 286 Vogel Manor MHC MO
(9,174 ) 33,081 Interest expense 31,817 (3,810 ) 28,007 Total expenses 171,232 (29,547 ) 141,685 Interest income ="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">72 91.7 % 245 Bush Ranch MO 46 69.6 % (660 ) 33 (627 ) Loss from continuing operations (30,384 ) 282 Hidden Acres MO 26 76.9 % 312 St. Louis, Missouri/IllinoisTotal/Weighted Average 2,861 (27,523 ) Preferred unit
distributions (5,942 ) (5,942 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership $ (36,326 ) $ 2,861 $ (33,465 ) Loss per unit
from continuing operations $ (0.84 ) $ 0.07 $ (0.77 ) Weighted average units
outstanding 43,262 1,912 81.0 % $ 290 97 Rental Income Per Occupied 43,262 (1) Represents the recasting of the results of 79 communities from
continuing operations to discontinued operations as if the communities had been
sold as of the beginning of the period. 45 Affordable Residential Communities LP Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations For
the Year Ended December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per unit
data) Year Ended December 31, 2004 Historical Discontinued Pro Forma Revenue Rental income $ 187,267 $ (35,836 ) $ 151,431
Number of Occupancy Homesite 15,221 (2,946 ) 12,275 Utility and other income 20,065 (4,319 ) 15,746 Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05
Net consumer finance interest income (expense) 104 (206 ) (102 ) Total revenue 222,657 (43,307 ) 179,350 Expenses Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma Property operations 75,150 (16,327 )
Real estate taxes 16,621 (3,294 ) Burntwood OK 13,327 Cost of manufactured homes sold 18,267 (3,575 ) 14,692 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 8,198 410 85.1 % $ 262 Westlake OK
8,198 Property management 7,127 7,127 General and administrative 29,361 29,361 Initial public offering related costs 4,417 4,417 Early termination of debt 16,685 16,685 Depreciation and amortization 72,014 335 73.4 % 291 Westmoor OK
(14,253 ) 57,761 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 3,591 (233 ) 3,358 Goodwill impairment 68.7 % 863
376 Meridian Sooner OK 203 92.1 % 863 Interest expense 56,892 273 Golden Rule
(7,030 ) 49,862 Total expenses 309,186 (44,712 ) 264,474 Interest income OK 196 80.6 % 273 Timberland OK (1,616 ) 19 (1,597 ) Loss from continuing operations (84,913 ) 173 78.0 % 277 Overholser Village OK 1,386 (83,527 ) Preferred unit
distributions (9,752 ) (9,752 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership
unitholders from continuing operations $ (94,665 ) $ 1,386 165 (93,279 ) Loss per unit
from continuing operations $ (2.34 ) $ 0.03 $ (2.31 ) Weighted average units
outstanding 40,413
79.4 % 296 Glenview * OK 60 71.7 % 258 Misty Hollow * OK 61 62.3 % 293 Oklahoma
City, OklahomaTotal/Weighted Average 1,887 78.5 % $ 289 Greensboro/Winston Salem, North
Carolina 40,413 (1) Represents
the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations to
discontinued operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning
of the period. 46 Affordable
Residential Communities LP Year Ended December 31, 2003 Discontinued Historical Operations(1)
Oakwood Forest * NC 469 74.2
Pro Forma Revenue % $ 262 Rental income $ 125,915 $ (23,910 ) $ 102,005 Sales of manufactured homes 21,681 21,681 Utility and other income
Woodlake * NC (2,944 ) 12,655 Total revenue 163,195 (26,854 ) 136,341 Expenses
307 64.5 % 293 Autumn Forest * NC 297 49.8 % 246 Village Park * NC 241 87.6 % 289 Gallant Estates * Property operations 44,295 (9,954 ) 34,341 Real estate taxes 10,247 (1,950 ) 8,297 Cost of manufactured homes sold 18,357 (18 NC 84 18,339 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 7,382 7,382 Property management 5,527 78.6 % 234 Greensboro/Winston
Salem, North CarolinaTotal/Weighted Average 1,398 69.5 % $ 270 Davenport/Moline/Rock
Island, Iowa/Illinois Cloverleaf 5,527 General and administrative 16,855 16,855 Depreciation and amortization 46,467 (9,733 ) 36,734 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 1,385 1,385 Interest expense 57,386 (4,687 ) 52,699 Total expenses 207,901 (26,342 ) 181,559 Interest income (1,439 ) 5 (1,434 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership
unitholders from continuing operations
IL 292 95.9 % $ 277 Silver Creek IA 272 $ (43,267 ) $ 84.2 % 239 Five Seasons Davenport IA 259
(517 ) $ 78.4 % (43,784 ) Loss per unit from continuing operations $ (2.20 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (2.23 ) Weighted average
units outstanding 19,699 19,699 (1) Represents
the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations to
discontinued operations as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning
of the period. 47 Affordable Residential
Communities LP Year Ended December 31, 2002 Discontinued 245 Falcon Farms IL 214 86.0 % 278 Historical Operations(1) Pro Forma Lakewood Estates IA 180 96.1 % 295 Revenue Lakeside IA 123 76.4 % 255 Rental income. $ 92,610 $ (19,581 ) $ 73,029 Sales of manufactured homes 31,942 31,942 Utility and other income 11,942 (2,119 ) 9,823 Total revenue 136,494 (21,700 ) 114,794 Expenses
Whispering Hills IL 45 86.7 % 277 Davenport/Moline/Rock
Island, Iowa/Illinois 1,385 86.8 % $ 265 Inland
Empire, California Desert Palms MHC * CA Property operations 33,341 (8,096 89.3 % 25,245 Real estate taxes 6,633 (1,549 ) 5,084 Cost of manufactured homes sold.
$ 370 Meridian Terrace * CA 257 95.7 % 424 Parkview Estates * CA 200 96.0 % 25,826 Retail home sales, finance and insurance. 8,582 426 Bermuda Palms * 8,582 Property management 4,105 4,105 General and administrative. 13,087 CA 185 98.4 % 333 La Quinta Ridge 13,087 Depreciation and amortization 37,058 (7,127 ) 29,931 Real estate and retail home asset impairment * CA 151 98.0 %
13,557 13,557 Interest expense. 43,804 (728 ) 43,076 Total expenses. 185,993 (17,500 ) 168,493 Interest income (1,390 ) 12 (1,378 385 Lido Estates * CA 121 98.3 % 468 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership
unitholders from continuing operations. $ (48,109 ) $ (4,212 Inland
Empire, CaliforniaTotal/Weighted Average 1,223 95.1 % $ 397 98 Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana $ (52,321 ) Loss per unit from continuing operations $ (2.94 ) $ (0.26 ) $ (3.20 ) Weighted average
units outstanding 16,353
16,353 (1) Represents
the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations
as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period. 48 Affordable Residential Communities Inc. June 30, 2005 Discontinued Historical Offering Operations Pro Forma Assets Rental and other
property, net $ 1,587,040 $ $ (292,906 ) $ 1,294,134 Assets held for sale 3,368 279,254 282,622 Cash and cash equivalents Broadmore IN 367 72.2 % $ 340 Highland IN 246 89.4 % 263 19,616 92,519 112,135 Tenant notes and other
receivables, net 32,826 (488 ) 32,338 Inventory 307 (5 ) 302 Loan origination costs,
net 14,510 4,081 (1,782 ) 16,809 Loan reserves 35,453 (42 ) 35,411 Goodwill 85,264 IN 228 96.1 % 308 Oak Ridge IN 204 (15,490 ) 69,774 Lease intangibles and
customer relationships, net 16,087 (2,981 ) 13,106 97.1 % 308 10,315 (284 ) Forest Creek IN 167 80.8 %
10,031 Total assets $ Elkhart/Goshen,
IndianaTotal/Weighted Average 1,212 85.6 % 1,804,786 $ 96,600 $ (34,724 ) $ 1,866,662 Liabilities
and Stockholders Equity $ 326 Notes payable $ 1,089,004 $ 96,600 $ (136,264 ) $ 1,049,340 Liabilities related to
assets held for sale 2,656 142,477 145,133 Accounts payable and
accrued expenses 31,273 (3,261 ) 28,012 Dividends payable 10,084 Charleston/North
Charleston, South Carolina Carnes Crossing SC 602 75.9 % $ ,248 Saddlebrook SC 425 93.2 % 275 The Pines SC 152 73.0 % 181 Charleston/North
Charleston, South Carolina 1,179 81.8 % $ 251 Southeast
Florida
10,084 Tenant deposits and other
liabilities 15,109 (2,952 Western Hills FL
) 12,157 Total liabilities 1,148,126 96,600 395 99.2 % $ 555 Sunshine City * FL 1,244,726 Minority interest 51,440 (1,816 ) 49,624 Commitments and
contingencies Stockholders equity Preferred stock, no par
value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively; liquidation
preference of $25 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends 119,108 119,108 Common stock, $.01 par
value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 40,955,729 and 40,874,061 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively 410 350 93.1 % 503 Lakeside of the Palm Beaches * 410 Additional paid-in
capital 791,922 FL 260 93.8 % 395 Havenwood FL 120 98.3
791,922 Unearned compensation (939 ) (939 ) Accumulated other
comprehensive income 1,206 % 478 Southeast
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 1,125 96.0 % $ 495 Nashville, Tennessee 1,206 Retained deficit (306,487 ) (32,908 )(1) (339,395 ) Total stockholders
equity 605,220 Countryside Village * &nbs 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> (32,908 ) 572,312 Total liabilities and stockholders equity $ 1,804,786 $ 96,600 TN 350 69.4
$ (34,724 ) $ 1,866,662 (1eak-after:avoid;">% $ 349 Weatherly Estates I * TN 49 Affordable Residential
Communities Inc. Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
270 63.3 % Discontinued Historical Operations(1) Shady Hills * TN 189 84.7 % 241 Trailmont * TN 131 89.3 % 304 Pro Forma Revenue Rental income $ 102,224 $ (19,082 ) $ 83,142
Weatherly Estates II * TN 131 67.9 26,278 (5,321 ) 20,957 Utility and other income 11,481 (2,250 )
% 190 Nashville,
TennesseeTotal/Weighted Average 1,071 72.8 % $ 291 Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina 9,231 Net consumer finance interest income 205 205 Total revenue 140,188 (26,653 ) Green Spring Valley NC Expenses
322 89.1 % $ 317 Foxhall Village NC 315 84.4 % 370 Deerhurst NC 202 Property operations 40,363 (9,186 ) 31,177 Real estate taxes 8,698 (1,671 ) 7,027 Cost of manufactured homes sold 24,405 (5,706 ) 18,699 Retail home sales, finance and insurance
81.2 % 325 Stony Brook North 7,317 7,317 Property management 4,759 NC 183 92.9
4,759 General and administrative 11,618 11,618 402
Depreciation and amortization 42,255 (9,174 ) 33,081 Interest expense 31,817 tyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> Pleasant Grove NC 72 70.8 % 177
) 28,007 Total expenses 171,232 (29,547 ) Raleigh/Durham/Chapel
Hill, North CarolinaTotal/Weighted Average 1,094 141,685 Interest income (660 ) 33
85.7 % $ 340 (627 ) Loss before allocation to minority interest (30,384 ) 2,861 99 (27,523 ) Minority interest 1,170 (190 ) 980 Net loss from continuing operations (29,214 ) 2,671 (26,543
) Preferred stock
dividend (5,156 ) (5,156 ) Net loss attributable to common stockholders from
continuing operations $ (34,370 ) $ 2,671 $ (31,699 ) Loss per share from continuing operations $ (0.84 ) Rental Income Per Occupied 0.07 $ (0.77 ) Weighted average
shares outstanding 40,869 40,869 (1) Represents the
recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the
communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period. 50 Affordable
Residential Communities Inc.
Number of Occupancy Year Ended December 31, 2004 Discontinued Historical Operations(1) Pro Forma Revenue Rental income Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Syracuse, New
York Casual Estates NY $ 187,267 $ (35,836 ) $ 151,431 Sales of manufactured homes 15,221 (2,946 ) 12,275
801 64.7 % $ 358 Pine Haven MHP * NY 130 64.6 % 226 Syracuse,
New YorkTotal/Weighted Average Utility and other income 20,065 (4,319 ) 15,746 Net consumer finance interest income (expense) 104 (206 ) (102 ) Total revenue 222,657 (43,307 931 64.7 % $ 340 ) 179,350 Expenses Tampa/Lakeland/Winter
Haven, Florida <" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Property operations 75,150 Winter Haven Oaks FL 200 97.5 % <0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.4pt;">
(16,327 ) 58,823 Real estate taxes 16,621 (3,294 ) 13,327 Cost of manufactured homes sold 18,267 (3,575 ) 14,692 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 8,198 $ 230 Pedaler's Pond FL 213 93.4 % 8,198 Property management 7,127 7,127 General and administrative 29,361 29,361 Initial public offering related costs 4,417 4,417 306 Cypress Shores FL 203 88.7 % 273 Indian Rocks
Early termination of debt 16,685 16,685 Depreciation and amortization 72,014 (14,253 ) 57,761 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 3,591 (233) 3,358 Goodwill impairment 863 863 Interest expense 56,892 (7,030 ) 49,862 Total expenses 309,186 * FL 148 87.8 % 323 Alafia Riverfront * FL 96 97.9 % 334 Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, FloridaTotal/Weighted
Average ="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> (44,712 ) 264,474 Interest income (1,616 ) 19 (1,597 ) Loss before allocation to minority interest (84,913 ) 1,386 (83,527 ) Minority interest 5,471 (66 ) 5,405 Net loss from continuing operations (79,442 ) 1,320 (78,122 ) Preferred stock
dividend 860 92.8 % $ 286 Sioux City, Iowa/Nebraska Evergreen Village IA 518 74.5 % $ 292 Siouxland Estates NE 271 (8,966 ) (8,966 ) Net loss attributable to common stockholders from
continuing operations $ (88,408 ) $ 1,320 $ (87,088 ) Loss per share from continuing operations $ (2.33 ) $ 0.03 $ (2.30 ) Weighted average
shares outstanding 37,967 86.0 % 37,967 (1) Represents the
recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if the
communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period. 51 Affordable
Residential Communities Inc. Year Ended December 31, 2003 Discontinued Historical Operations(1) Pro Forma Revenue Rental income $ 289 Tallview Terrace IA 205 84.9 % 286 Sioux City, Iowa/NebraskaTotal/Weighted Average 994 79.8 % $ 290
125,915 $ (23,910 ) $ 102,005 Sales of manufactured homes 21,681 21,681 Utility and other income 15,599 (2,944 ) 12,655 Total revenue 163,195 (26,854 ) 136,341 Expenses Property operations 44,366 (9,954 ) 34,412 Real estate taxes 10,247 (1,950 ) 8,297 Cost of manufactured homes sold 18,357 (18 ) 18,339 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 7,382 7,382 Property management 5,527 5,527 General and administrative 16,818 16,818 Depreciation and amortization 46,467 (9,733 ) 36,734 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 1,385 1,385 Interest expense Des Moines, Iowa Southridge
Estates IA 257 86.8 % $ 346 Country Club
Crossing IA 225 89.3 % 306 Sunrise Terrace 57,386 (4,687 ) 52,699 Total expenses 207,935 (26,342 ) 181,593 Interest income (1,439 ) 5 (1,434 ) Loss before allocation to minority interest (43,301 ) (517 ) (43,818 ) Minority interest 5,983 108 6,091 Net loss attributable to common stockholders from
continuing operations $ (37,318 ) $ (409 ) $ (37,727 ) * IA 200 73.0 % 245
Loss per share from continuing operations $ (2.20 ) $ (0.02 ) $ (2.22 ) Weighted average
shares outstanding 16,973 16,973 (1) Represents
the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations as if
the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period. 52 Affordable
Residential Communities Inc. IA 182 99.5 % 313 Arbor Lake * Year Ended December 31, 2002 Discontinued Historical Operations(1) Pro Forma Revenue Rental income.
IA 40 77.5 % 240 $ 92,610 $ (19,581 ) $ 73,029 Sales of manufactured homes 31,942 Des Moines, IowaTotal/Weighted Average 31,942 Utility and other income 11,942 (2,119 ) 9,823 Total revenue 136,494 904 86.5 % $ 305 Flint, Michigan Torrey Hills MI 377 80.1 % (21,700 ) 114,794 Expenses Property operations 33,341 (8,096 ) 25,245 Real estate taxes 6,633 (1,549 ) 5,084 Cost of manufactured homes sold. 25,826 25,826 Retail home sales, finance and insurance. 8,597 $ 376 Villa 8,597 MI 319 60.5 4,105 4,105 General and administrative. 13,088 % 355 13,088 Depreciation and amortization 37,058 (7,127 ) 29,931 Real estate and retail home asset impairment 13,557 13,557 Interest expense. 43,804 (728 ) 43,076 Total expenses. 186,009 Birchwood Farms MI (17,500 ) 168,509 Interest income (1,390 ) 142 88.0 % 317 12 (1,378 ) Flint, MichiganTotal/Weighted 838 74.0 % $ 358 Corpus Christi, Texas Misty Winds Loss before allocation to minority interest (48,125 ) (4,212 ) (52,337 ) Minority
interest.
TX 6,460 565 7,025 Net loss attributable to common stockholders from
continuing operations $ (41,665 ) $ (3,647 ) $ (45,312 ) Loss per share from continuing operations $ (2.87 ) $ (0.25 ) $ (3.12 ) Weighted average
shares outstanding 14,535 14,535 (1) Represents
the recasting of the results of 79 communities from continuing operations
as if the communities had been sold as of the beginning of the period. 53 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
historical financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus and the financial information in the tables below. Financial
information contained in this discussion is not presented as of any date or for
any period following June 30, 2005, unless otherwise indicated. For a
discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership of the proposed sale of
up to 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005 and the sale of the notes,
please see Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical
and Pro Forma Financial Data and Affordable Residential Communities LP
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data. General Structure and Recent Developments Affordable
Residential Communities LP is the operating partnership of ARC, a fully
integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT which acquires, renovates,
repositions and operates primarily all-age manufactured home communities. The
Partnership also conducts certain complementary business activities focused on
improving and maintaining occupancy in our communities, including the rental of
manufactured homes, the retail sale of manufactured homes, the financing of
sales of manufactured homes and acting as agent in the sale of homeowners
insurance and other related insurance products. ARC conducts substantially all
of its activities through the Partnership, of which ARC is the sole general
partner, holding a 94.8% ownership interest as of June 30, 2005. Beginning
in 1995, ARCs co-founders founded several companies under the name Affordable
Residential Communities for the purpose of engaging in the business of
acquiring, renovating, repositioning and operating manufactured home
communities, as well as certain related businesses. ARC was formed in July 1998
as a Maryland corporation for the purpose of acting as the investment vehicle
for and a co-general partner of the Partnership, the fourth real property
partnership organized and operated by ARCs 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">338 90.5 % $ 301 ARC
completed its initial public offering in the first quarter of 2004. ARC issued
approximately 24.6 million shares of common stock at $19.00 per share
(including, approximately 2.3 million shares sold by existing shareholders). In
March 2004, ARCs underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to
purchase 791,592 shares of common stock at $19.00 per share. Concurrent with
the IPO, ARC raised $125.0 million of gross proceeds through the issuance of
5.0 million shares of Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. All
proceeds were directly contributed to the Partnership. In connection with ARCs IPO, we completed the following
additional transactions: · The acquisition of 90
communities from Hometown America for approximately $615.3 million comprising
26,406 homesites. This includes 11 communities acquired post-closing upon the
completion of the loan assumption process, with the final three loan
assumptions completed on April 9, 2004. · A financing transaction
totaling $500.0 million comprising of $215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate
mortgage debt with an interest rate of 5.53%, $100.7 million of 5 year fixed
rate mortgage debt with an interest rate of 5.05% and $184.0 million of 2 year
floating rate mortgage debt. We used the proceeds to repay certain indebtedness
and to fund a portion of the Hometown acquisition. 54 Seascape * TX 257 60.3 % 321 Seamist * TX 160 68.8 % 393 Corpus Christi, TexasTotal/Weighted
Average 755 · The closing of a $125
million consumer finance facility (as amended in connection with our lease
receivables line of credit) to support our in-community home sales and
in-community finance programs. On June 30,
2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from the D.A.M. MASTER
ENTITY, L.P. The communities were located in 3 states and included 3,573 homesites. The total purchase
price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was approximately $65.5
million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of $29.7 million. In August 2004,
we cancelled our $125.0 million senior revolving credit facility and incurred
approximately $3.3 million in debt extinguishment costs. In September 2004,
we obtained a revolving credit mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0
million. This facility is an obligation of a subsidiary of the Partnership and
is secured by 33 communities that previously secured the cancelled senior
revolving credit facility, as well as various additional communities acquired
subsequent to the ARC IPO. Advances under the revolving credit mortgage
facility are limited by borrowing base requirements related to the value and
cash flows of the communities securing the loan. As amended in September 2005,
the revolving credit mortgage facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR
plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30,
2005) and has an extended term through September, 2006. We incurred a
commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of the facility and an additional fee of
0.5% at the amendment date and will pay an advance fee to the extent any
advance takes the amount of indebtedness outstanding under the facility above
$58.764 million. The facility contains no significant financial covenants. As
of June 30, 2005, $58.8 million was outstanding under the revolving
credit mortgage facility. In August 2004,
we amended our floorplan lines of credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0
million, secured by manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended lines of
credit, the lender will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes
for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in
advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due upon
sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended
lines of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to
the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the
length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments
are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of the
home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the
homes original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of
months since the homes purchase. The amended lines of credit require us to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to
tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of
$15.0 million, all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all
financial covenants of the lines of credit as of June 30, 2005. The lines
of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of 0.25%
per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination
date. In July 2004,
we completed the acquisition of the Western Mobile Estates manufactured home
community located in West Valley City, Utah, comprising 145 homesites. The total
purchase price of $3.8 million included $3.76 million in seller financing.
In September, 2004, we completed the acquisition of the Willow Creek Estates
manufactured home community located in Ogden, Utah, comprising 137 homesites
for a total cash purchase price of $3.2 million. Also in July 2004,
we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities
comprising 2,933 homesites. In addition to the 12 communities, as part of the
auction, we also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped commercial land
located adjacent to one of our communities in Colorado. The auction was held in
September 2004. These sales, other than the sale of one of the 12
properties, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004, resulting in net proceeds
to the Partnership of $21.6 million after selling commissions, sales expenses
and the repayment of approximately $6.0 million of associated debt. The 55 remaining community continues to be held for sale and was
classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2005 based on our intent to
sell this community during 2005. In September 2004,
we entered into an agreement to sell three communities, comprising 1,073
homesites, to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of
approximately $5.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of
2004. In October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction
agreement to sell 12 communities comprising 2,440 homesites. The auction was
held in December 2004. Eleven of these 12 sales closed during the first
quarter of 2005, resulting in net proceeds of $12.4 million after selling
commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately
$28.9 million of associated debt included in liabilities related to assets
held for sale, and other required debt payments. The remaining community was
classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005, and was sold in April 2005. Also in October 2004, we entered
into agreements to sell three communities comprising 709 homesites to
unaffiliated third parties for a total sales price of approximately $7.9
million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter of 2004. On
September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARCs
board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARCs
board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director
James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC.
Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARCs former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARCs board of directors and would
direct ARCs sales of communities. On that
date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625
dividend on ARCs Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a
distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnerships Series C preferred
partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on
October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARCs
board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARCs common stock
and the quarterly distribution on the Partnerships common partnership units,
in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Also on September 21,
2005, ARCs board of directors authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in
33 markets, either at auction or through various negotiated sales. Following
these sales and assuming that all communities are sold, ARC will continue to
own approximately 237 communities that it believes meet its business plan
objectives and operating strategy objectives. In
September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to extend the
maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the facility bears
interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30,
2005). See Description of Other IndebtednessRevolving Credit Mortgage
Facility Due 2006 for a further discussion of this amendment. In October 2005, we amended our lease receivables facility
to increase the size of the faclity from $75 million to $150 million. The
amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the lease
receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net book
value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by two of our indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP (collectively,
Housing) and located in ARCs communities, to 65%, subject to certain other
applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on
borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus
one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the
maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008.
See Description of Other IndebtednessLease Receivables Facility Due 2008 for
a further discussion of this amendment. 56 Overview of
Results For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, net
loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $19.2 million and $36.0
million, as compared to net losses attributable to such unitholders of $7.6
million and $45.6 million for the same periods in 2004. For the year ended December 31,
2004, net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was $101.3
million, as compared to net losses attributable to such holders of $39.9
million and $47.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005,
funds from operations available to common partnership unitholders, or FFO, was
$0.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as compared to FFO of $9.8 million
and ($13.8) million for the same periods in 2004. For the year ended December 31,
2004, FFO was $(24.8) million as compared to $1.5 million and $(13.2) million
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Partnerships results for the six months ended June 30,
2004 reflect the inclusion of one-time charges of $27.9 million related to ARCs
IPO, acquisition of certain assets from Hometown America LLC and the repayment
of certain indebtedness. Our results for the year of 2004 were impacted by
charges totaling $31.2 million related to ARCs IPO, financing activities and
the Hometown acquisition. The primary components of the charges include: (i) restricted
grants of partnership units of $10.1 million associated with ARCs IPO; (ii) write-off
of loan origination costs and exit fees associated with the termination of
indebtedness of $16.7 million; and (iii) costs of $4.4 million related to
ARCs IPO. These costs are not expected to recur in future reporting periods. The Partnerships results for the year ended December 31,
2004 also were impacted by several other charges including: (i) $11.2
million of retail losses related to sales of older vacant homes during the
fourth quarter at discounts to their carrying value and marketing and promotion
costs incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our Hispanic
marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs in our
rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges related to
older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their
carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and
reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $900,000
of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0
million of severance costs primarily related to the fourth quarter resignation
of ARCs chief operating officer; (v) $500,000 of impairment charges
related to three communities; and (vi) $500,000 related to net uninsured
property damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third
quarter in the Southeast United States. On a same
community basis, revenue in the Partnerships real estate segment of $35.5
million and $71.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005, was comparable to real estate segment revenue of $35.6 million and $70.9
million for the same periods in 2004. Such revenue was up 1.4% to $140.2
million from $138.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. Same
community expenses increased 5.2% and 8.4% to $15.2 million and $30.3 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to the same
periods in 2004. As a result, real estate net segment income from same
communities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased
4.3% and 5.2% to $20.3 million and $40.7 million, respectively, as compared to
the same periods in 2004. Such expenses increased 10.0% to $60.3 million from
$54.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2003. As a result, same communities real estate
net segment income decreased 4.3% to $79.9 million from $83.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31,
2003. See FFO and real estate net segment income information included in this
section for explanations of FFO and real estate net segment income and for
reconciliations of real estate net segment income to net loss, the most
directly comparable GAAP measures. 57 Total
portfolio occupancy averaged 82.8% and 82.3% for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to 83.2% and 83.8% for the same
periods in 2004. Occupancy was 84.5% and 83.0% as of June 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Average same community occupancy was 83.7% and 83.3% for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to
84.6% and 85.0% for the same periods in 2004. Average total portfolio occupancy
was 83.0% and 88.4% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and was 81.5% and 85.7% as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Average same community occupancy was 84.6% and 88.5% for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decreases mainly
are due to lenders moving repossessed homes out of the communities, the lack of
available chattel financing for manufactured home buyers, our decision to
position our inventory to facilitate conversion of renters to long-term owner
residents by holding for sale homes coming off lease, and, in the case of the
total portfolio occupancy, the Hometown acquisition. Net
occupancy increased by 874 residents during the second quarter of 2005, or
1.4%, as compared to an increase of 380 residents in the first quarter,
primarily due to an increase in home renters resulting from the companys lease
with option to purchase program initiative. In addition, we removed a net 716
lots from our total homesite count in the sec Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale 58 The following table summarizes our
occupancy net activity for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. For the Three Months Ended June 30, Same Real Estate Segment 2005 2004 2005 2004 Homeowner
activity: Homeowner move ins 99 105 001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Pueblo, Colorado 176 149 Homeowner move outs (424 ) (378 )
Meadowbrook * CO ) (649 ) Home sales 702 &lign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
387
53 989 100 Repossession move outs (366 ) (554 ) (421 ) (561 ) Net homeowner activity 11 (774 ) (59 ) (961 ) Home renter
activity: 63.0 % $ 301 Sunset Country CO 203 70.0 % 343 Oasis CO 161 87.0 % 333 Pueblo, ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 751 70.0 Home renter move ins 766 1,208 1,081 1,530 Home renter lease with
option to purchase move ins 896 % $ 321 1,232 Southern New York Home renter move outs (1,152 ) (996 ) New Twin Lakes NY 256 (1,380 ) (1,356 ) Net home renter activity 510 99.6 % $ 491 Huguenot Estates 212 933 174 Net activity 521 NY 166 99.4 % (562 ) 874 (787 ) 335 Spring Valley
Village NY 135 98.5 % 645 Connelly Terrace NY 100 100.0
Acquisitions and otherhomeowners 3,430 Acquisitions and otherhome renters % 389 Washingtonville
Manor 23 Net activity, including
acquisitions and other 521 (562 )
NY 82 874 2,666 The following reconciles the above activity to the period end
occupied homesites. Net homeowner activity 11 (774 ) (59 ) 2,469 % 560 Southern New YorkTotal/Weighted Average 739 99.5 % $ Occupied homeowner sites, beginning of period 26,004 27,840
478 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 45,727 44,431 Occupied homeowner sites,
end of period 26,015 27,066 45,668 46,900
Net home renter activity 510 212 933 Marion Village 197 Occupied home renter
sites, beginning of period 5,235 4,233 6,566 IA 5,516 Occupied home renter sites, end of period 80.3 % $ 252 Cedar Terrace IA 234 81.6 % 250 Cedar Rapids, IowaTotal/Weighted Average 671 80.8 % $ 252 Philadelphia/Wilmington/Atlantic City,
PA-NJ-DE-MD
5,745 4,445 7,499 5,713 Total occupied homesites,
end of period 31,760 31,511 53,167 Valley ViewDanboro PA 230 100.0
52,613 Total occupancy percentage(1) 85.1 % $ 362 Valley ViewHoney Brook 83.9 % 84.5 % PA 145 87.6 % 295 Sunnyside PA 83.0 % (1) As
a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30,
2005, total occupancy increased by 1.0% (0.5% same communities). 59 The following table summarizes our
occupancy net activity for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. For the Six Months Ended June 30, Same Real Estate Segment
71 97.2 % 409 2004 2005 2004 Homeowner
activity:
Martin'S * PA 60 Homeowner
move ins 315 230 466 320 Homeowner move outs (823 ) (668 ) (1,526 ) (1,142 ) Home
sales 1,278 100.0 % 303 Hideaway 67 1,763 115 Repossession move outs (832 face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> * PA 40 ) (644 ) (943 ) (1,045 ) Net
homeowner activity (62 ) (1,015 ) (240 82.5 % 306 Shady Grove ) (1,752 ) * PA 40 107.5 % Home
renter move ins 1,391 2,495 297 Gregory Courts PA 39 97.4 %  
1,977 2,980 Home renter lease with
option to purchase move ins 1,469 2,045 349 Mountaintop
Home
renter move outs (2,049 ) (2,164 ) (2,528 ) (2,408 ) Net home renter activity PA 39 94.9 % 811 331 1,494 572 Net
activity 749 (684 ) 1,254 (1,180 ) 315 Acquisitions and otherhomeowners 20,781 Acquisitions
and otherhome renters 908 Net activity, including
acquisitions and other Valley ViewMorgantown * PA
23 87.0 % 279 Scenic View * PA 20 85.0 % 362 Nichols * PA 10 100.0 % 348 Philadelphia/Wilmington/ 717 95.4 % $ 337 Manhattan, Kansas 749 (684 ) 1,254 20,509 The
following reconciles the above activity to the period end occupied homesites. Net homeowner activity (62 ) (1,015 ) Colonial Gardens KS
(240 ) 19,029 Occupied
homeowner sites, beginning of period 26,077 28,081 45,908 27,871 Occupied homeowner sites,
end of period 26,015 27,066 45,668 99.7
46,900 Net home
renter activity 811 331 1,494 1,480 Occupied home renter
sites, beginning of period 4,934 4,114 6,005 4,233 Occupied
home renter sites, end of period 5,745 4,445 7,499 5,713 Total occupied homesites,
end of period 31,760 31,511 53,167 52,613 Total
occupancy percentage(1) 85.1 % 83.9 % 84.5 % 83.0 % (1) As
a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30,
2005, total occupancy increased by 1.0% (0.5% same communities). On June 30,
2005, our total manufactured homes owned was 8,718 homes. In the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, we sold 989 and 1,763 manufactured homes,
respectively, from our home inventory, compared with 100 and 115 for the same
periods in 2004. 60 The following table summarizes our
occupancy net activity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002: Year Ended December 31, % $ 276 Riverchase KS 159 % 291 Blue Valley KS 147 97.3 % 321 Manhattan, KansasTotal/Weighted Average 648 98.6 % $ 2004 Same 2003 Same Company Total Communities Communities 2004 2003
289 101 Rental Income 2002 2004 2003 2003 2002 Homeowner activity:
Per Occupied Homeowner
move ins 543 832 1,408 369 805 309 551 Homeowner
move outs (2,843 ) (1,330 ) (2,053 ) (1,473 ) (1,327 ) (519 ) (785 Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Birmingham, Alabama Green Park South * e="font-size:9.0pt;">) Home sales 1,341 964 Repossession
move outs (2,067 ) (1,868 ) AL
(1,401 ) (1,423 ) (1,850 ) (594 ) (407 ) Net
homeowner activity (3,026 ) (2,366 ) (2,046 ) (1,563 ) (2,372 ) (804 ) (641 ) Home renter activity: 412 97.3 % $ 269 100 Oaks * AL 223 70.0 % 267 Birmingham, AlabamaTotal/Weighted
Average 635 87.7 % $ 268 Tyler, Texas 5,649 4,693 4,028 4,491 4,572 1,493 1,625 Home
renter lease to own move ins 386 262 Home
renter move outs (5,171 ) (3,614 ) (1,761 ) (4,288 ) (3,591 ) (1,187 ) (748 ) Net
home renter activity 864 1,079 2,267 465 981 &nng:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">
Shiloh Pines TX 314 73.9 % $ 335 Eagle Creek TX 177 88.7 % 279 306 877 Net
activity (2,162 ) (1,287 ) 221 (1,098 ) (1,391 ) (498 ) 236 Acquisitions
Homeowner 21,063 470 793 1 Acquisitions
Home renter 908 Net
activity, including acquisitions 19,809 Rose Country
Estates TX 105 74.3 % 363 Tyler, TexasTotal/Weighted Average 596 78.4 % $ 321 Stillwater, Oklahoma (817 ) 1,014 (1,098 ) (1,391 ) (498 ) 237 The following reconciles the above activity to
the period end occupied homesites. Net
homeowner activity 18,037 (1,896 ) (1,253 ) (1,563 ) (2,372 ) (804 ) (640 ) Occupied
homeowner sites, beginning of period 27,871 29,767 31,020 Crestview * OK 237 60.3 % $ 276 Eastern Villa * OK 125 27,270 29,642 13,396 14,036 Occupied
homeowner sites, end of period 86.4 % 257 Countryside
45,908 27,871 29,767 25,707 27,270 * OK 118 69.5 % 300 Oakridge /
Stonegate *
12,592 13,396 Net home
renter activity 1,772 1,079 2,267 465 981 306 OK 108
877 Occupied
home renter sites, beginning of period 4,233 3,154 887 4,459 3,478 1,197 320 Occupied
home renter sites, end of period 6,005 4,233 3,154 4,924 4,459 1,503 1,197 Total
occupied homesites, end of period 51,913 32,104 32,921 30,631 31,729 14,095 14,593 During the
year ended December 31, 2004, we purchased 4,024 homes including homes
purchased in our Hometown and other acquisitions. On December 31, 2004,
our total home inventory was 8,286 homes, including 920 homes held for sale. In the fourth quarter of 2004, we increased sales of older
homes primarily through our in-community sales operations in which we focused
on affordable price points, increased marketing and training of our employees.
In the three months and year ended December 31, 2004, we sold 946 and
1,387 manufactured homes from our home inventory, respectively. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates We have
prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, which
require us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded
amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results may differ from these estimates. We have provided a summary of
our significant accounting policies in Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. We
have summarized below those accounting policies that require our most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments and that have the most significant
impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our management
evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis. These estimates are based on
information currently available to management and on various other assumptions
management believes are reasonable. 61 Acquisition of Real Estate and
Intangible Assets. When we acquire real estate properties, we all:right;"> 75.0 % 303 Stillwater, OklahomaTotal/Weighted
Average 588 70.4 % $ 282 Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana We value
our acquired intangible assets in accordance with purchase accounting for
acquisitions by allocating value to above and below market leases, in-place
leases and customer relationships. We measure the aggregate value of in-place
leases and customer relationships by the excess of the purchase price paid for
a property (after adjusting the in-place leases to market) over the estimated
fair value of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above. We also
value the occupied rental homes we acquire as if they were vacant. We determine
the as-if-vacant fair value of the manufactured homes by
considering the expected lease-up period for the home (based on lease-up
history for rental homes in that community) and the expected lost rental
revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual rental rates). We
measure the aggregate value of the intangible assets related to rental homes,
consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the purchase price
paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to market) less the
estimated value of the property as-if-vacant. Useful Lives of Assets and
Amortization Methods. We determine the useful lives of our real estate
assets (generally 30 years) and rental homes (generally three years) based
on historical and industry experience with the lives of those particular assets
and experience with the timing of significant repairs and replacement of those
assets. We have estimated the useful life of acquired community customer
relationships as five years based on our experience with the period of
time a resident lives in our community and industry experience generally with
resident turnover. We have established the life of the rental home customer
relationships as the term of the initial related lease. The acquired community
customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on
a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of economic
benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the intangible
assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably
estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool our customer contracts
on a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible assets in a manner
other than straight line. We will reassess this determination as we gain
additional experience with lease renewals. The estimates of useful lives and
the amortization method impact the amount of depreciation and amortization
expense we report, and therefore the amount of net income or loss we report. Impairment of Real Estate Assets. We recognize an impairment
loss on a real estate asset (including mobile homes) if the assets
undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than its depreciated cost
whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the real
estate asset may not be recoverable. We compute a real estate assets
undiscounted expected future cash flow using certain estimates and assumptions.
We calculate the impairment loss as the difference between the assets fair
market value and its carrying value. 62 Impairment of Intangible Assets. We combine our finite-lived
intangible assets, which consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles
with a finite life, with the related tangible assets (primarily consisting of
real estate assets) at the lowest level for which cash flows are readily
identifiable. Whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the asset group is tested for
recoverability. If the asset group is not recoverable from the undiscounted
cash flows attributable to that asset group, an impairment loss is recognized
as the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and the
estimated fair value of the asset group. Impairment losses were recorded by the
Partnershippt 0pt 0pt;width:6.5pt;">
Pinecrest Village * LA 427 75.4 % $ 198 Stonegate * LA 157 Impairment of Goodwill. We evaluate goodwill
for potential impairment using the market values of our equity and multiples of
earnings to value our reporting units based on our experience in the industry
and industry analyses provided by financial institutions. We perform this
evaluation at least annually, and more frequently if events and circumstances
warrant. If the market value of our equity decreases, an additional impairment
charge related to our goodwill may be necessary. Allowance for Receivables. We report receivables net of
an allowance for receivables that we may not collect in the future. For
receivables relating to community rents (owner and rental), we fully reserve
amounts over 60 days past due and, in some cases, we fully reserve amounts
currently due based on specific circumstances. For receivables relating to
notes arising from the sale of manufactured homes, we reserve amounts currently
in default and estimate those receivables impaired at period end that are
expected to go into default over the next year, taking into account the
expected value of the manufactured home to which we would obtain title in
foreclosure. Inventory Valuations. We value manufactured home
inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on the purchase
price of the specific homes, reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates
earned from manufacturers when we purchased the homes. We base market value of
inventory on estimated net realizable value. Derivatives. We manage our exposure to
interest rate risk through the use of interest rate swaps and caps and
recognize in earnings the ineffective portion of gains or losses associated
with these instruments immediately. We obtain values for the interest rate
swaps and caps from financial institutions that market these instruments. Our
derivative instruments are used for hedging purposes and as such result in no
impact to the consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized income related
to derivatives is reflected as other comprehensive income within the
consolidated statements of partners capital and totalled $0.3 million and
$1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and year ended December 31,
2004, respectively. Discontinued Operations. We consider a
community to be a discontinued operation when: (i) management commits to a
plan to sell the asset, supported by a Board resolution granting approval to
proceed with the sale; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in
its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for
sales of such assets; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other
actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated;
(iv) the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is
expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year;
(v) the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is
reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions
required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant
changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In
accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, SFAS, No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each of our
assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, less
cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances and
corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all
comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if
applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance.
Interest 63 97.5 % and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the
communities classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of
operations and cash flows of the assets sold and those classified as held for
sale are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We
recognize any estimated losses on the sales of communities in the period in
which the properties are discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the
sales of communities when realized. A description of the facts and
circumstances leading to the expected disposal, the expected manner and timing
of that disposal, and, if not separately presented on the face of the balance
sheet, the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities
included as part of the disposal group is disclosed in the notes to the
financial statements. We disclose in the notes to our financial statements (and
on the face of the income statement) the gain or loss recognized in accordance
with SFAS No. 144 and, if applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax
profit or loss reported in discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable,
in the notes to our financial statements the segment under which the long-lived
asset is reported. 64 Comparison
of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Same Periods in
2004 The following tables present
certain information relative to our real estate segment as of June 30,
2005 and 2004 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004. Same Communities reflects information for all communities owned by us
at both January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005. Same Communities does
not include the Hometown acquisition, the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition or the
six other communities that we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2004 (in
thousands, except home, occupancy, community, and per unit information): Same Communities(4) Real Estate Segment(4) 2005 2004 2005 &nth="22" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:16.3pt;">
240 Shreveport/Bossier City, LouisianaTotal/Weighted
Average 584 81.3 % $ 212 Las Cruces, New Mexico Encantada * bsp;2004 Three Months Ended June 30: Average total homesites 37,485 37,554 NM
63,493 60,539 Average total rental homes 6,388 6,344 8,422 7,609 Average
occupied homesiteshomeowners 26,026 27,446 45,722 45,159 Average occupied homesitesrental homes 5,352 4,335 6,841 5,227 Average
total occupied homesites 31,378 354 83.9 % $ 331 Valley Verde * NM 202 85.1 % 314 Las Cruces, New MexicoTotal/Weighted
Average 556 84.4 % 31,781 52,563 50,386 Average occupancyrental homes 83.8 % 68.3 % 81.2 % 68.7 % Average occupancytotal(5) 83.7 % 84.6 % 82.8 % 83.2 % Real estate revenue $ 325 Gainesville, Florida Oak Park Village FL 344 91.6 % $ 251 Whitney FL 206 97.1 % 248 Gainesville, FloridaTotal/Weighted
Average
Homeowner
rental income $ 22,505 $ 22,990 $ 39,338 550 93.6 % $ 250 Huntsville, Alabama $ 37,575 Home
renter rental income 9,245 9,054 Merrimac Manor * 11,701 9,987 Other
AL 172 26.7 % $ 383 158 128 327 322 Rental
income 31,908 32,172 51,366 47,884 Utility
and other income 3,560 3,445
Green Cove * AL 164 82.9 % 177 Cedar Creek * AL 132 60.6 % 229 5,421 5,114 Total
real estate revenue 35,468 35,617 56,787 52,998 Real estate expenses Property
operations expenses Rambling Oaks * AL 80 85.0 % 222 Huntsville, AlabamaTotal/Weighted
Average 548 60.2 % $ 225 11,574 20,042 17,626 Real
estate taxes 3,033 2,873 4,407 4,080 Total
real estate expenses 15,202 14,447 24,449 21,706 Real
estate net segment income $ 20,266 $ 21,170 102 Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for
Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Scranton/Wilkes/BarreHazleton, Pennsylvania 25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">
$ 32,338 $ 31,292 Average
monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite(1) $ 377 $ 374
$ 360 $ 351 Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner
occupied homesite(2) $ 288 $ 279 $ 287 $ 277 Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3) $ 315 $ Maple Manor PA 313 87.9 % $ 229 Moosic Heights PA 152 78.9 % 238
316 $ 298 $ 292 (1) Average
monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real
estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the
number of months in the period. (2) Average
monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as
homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided
by the number of months in the period. (3) Average
monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate
revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in
the period. (4) Real
estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through
June 30, 2005. (5) As
a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30,
2005, average occupancy increased by 0.3% (0.1% same communities). 65 Oakwood Lake Village Same PA 79 91.1 % 238 Scranton/Wilkes/Barre/ Communities(4) Real Estate Segment(4) 2005 2004 2005 2004 Six Months Ended June 30: Average total homesites 37,512 37,554 63,563 53,838 544 85.8 % $ 233 Pocatello,
Idaho
Average total rental homes 6,422 6,059 8,369 6,918 Average
occupied homesiteshomeowt:11.0pt;margin:6.0pt 0pt .0001pt 20.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-20.0pt;">
26,065 27,697 45,838 40,296 Average occupied homesitesrental homes 5,189 4,241 6,501 4,824 Philbin Estates * ID 111 Average
total occupied homesites 31,254 31,938 52,339
79.3 % $ 290 45,120 Average occupancyrental homes 80.8 % 70.0 % 77.7 Cowboy * ID 174 79.3 % 371 Belaire % 69.7 % Average occupancytotal(5) 83.3 % 85.0 % 82.3 % 83.8 % Real estate revenue
* ID 168 81.0 % 261 Pocatello, IdahoTotal/Weighted
Average 453 79.9 % $ 310 Gillette,
Wyoming="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Homeowner
rental income $ 45,043 $ 46,404
Eastview $ 78,666 $ WY 210 81.9 %
66,999 Home
renter rental income 18,501 17,591 22,932 18,727 Other 272 237 626 484 Rental
income 63,816 64,232 102,224 86,210 Utility
and other income 7,201 $ 372 Westview WY 130 83.1 % 290
6,697 10,914 8,950 Total
real estate revenue 71,017 70,929 113,138 Highview WY 95,160 Real estate expenses 3" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">
94 92.6 % Property
operations expenses 24,286 22,223 283 Park Plaza 40,363
WY 30,234 Real
estate taxes 6,029 5,749 8,698 7,390 Total
real estate expenses 30,315 27,972 49,061 37,624 Real
estate net segment income $ 40,702 $ 42,957 $ 64,077 $ 57,536 Average
monthly real estate revenue per total occupied homesite(1) 78 93.6 % 301 Gillette, WyomingTotal/Weighted 512 85.9 % $ 379 $ 322 Casper,
Wyoming
370 $ 360 $ 352 Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner
occupied homesite(2) $ 288 $ 279 Hidden Hills WY 125 96.8 % $ 286 $ 277 Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3) $ 316 $ 315 $ 297 $ 295 $ 327 Terrace WY 112 97.3 % 272 Green Valley Village WY As of June 30: 105 97.1 % 375 Plainview WY 70 97.1 % 340 Total communities 199 199 315 313 Total homesites 37,301 37,554 62,942 63,400 Occupied homesites 31,760 31,511 53,167 Terrace II WY 52,613 Total rental homes owned
70 95.7 % 6,486 6,616 8,718 8,023 Occupied rental homes 5,745 4,445 7,499 357 Casper, WyomingTotal/Weighted 482 96.9 % $ 331 Grand
Forks, North Dakota Columbia Heights (1) Average
monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real
estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the
number of months in the period. (2) Average
monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as
homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided
by the number of months in the period. (3) Average
monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate
revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in
the period. (4) Real
estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through
June 30, 2005. (5) As
a result of the reduction of 716 lots (247 same communities) at June 30,
2005, average occupancy increased by 0.3% (0.1% same communities). 66 Three Months Ended June 30, Same Communities(1) As Reported
2005 2004 2005 2004 Net segment income: ND 302 94.7 % $ 322 < valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .2pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.0pt;">
Real
estate President's Park ND
$ 20,266 $ 21,170 $ 32,338 $ 31,292 Retail home
sales 163 88.3 % 281 Grand Forks, North DakotaTotal/Weighted
Aver.0pt;">
(754 ) (1,019 ) Finance
and insurance (561 ) (130
) (561 ) (130 465 ) 92.5 % $ 308 Cheyenne,
Wyoming (130 ) (44 ) (130 ) (44 ) 19,575 20,996 30,893 30,099 Other expenses: Property
management 1,576 Big Country WY 248 82.3 % $ (2) 1,011 2,494 1,600 General
and administrative 6,245
242 Cimmaron Village WY 152 92.1 % 4,275 6,259 4,304 Depreciation
and amortization 14,166 11,902 22,224 17,242 Interest
expense 10,413 9,736 16,544 12,729 Total
other expenses 32,400 26,924 47,521 35,875 Interest
income (277 ) (403 )(5) (277 ) (450 ) Loss from
continuing operations (12,548 ) (5,525 ) (16,351 ) (5,326 ) Income
from discontinued operations 72 343 Gain on sale of discontinued operations 52 Net loss (12,548 ) (5,525 ) (16,227 302 Englewood Village WY ) (4,983 ) Preferred
unit distributions (2,971 ) (2,578 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders
61 91.8 % 292 (12,548 ) $ (5,525 ) $ (19,198 ) $ Cheyenne, WyomingTotal/Weighted 461 86.8 % $ 269 (7,561 ) (1) Same
communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the
Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2004 and the
communities sold or held for sale before June 30, 2005. (2) Expense
was prorated based on 199 same communities as compared to 315
actual communities in 2005 and 313 actual communities in 2004. (3) Excludes
amortization of restricted units issued in connection with ARCs IPO. (4) Excludes
restricted unit expenses of $10.1 million recognized in connection with ARCs
IPO. (5) Excludes
interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARCs IPO, the
financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition. 67 Six Months Ended June 30, Same Communities(1) 103 Rental Income As Reported 2005 2004 2005
2004 Net segment income: Real
estate $ 40,702 $ 42,957 $ 64,077 $ 57,536 Retail
home sales (3,620 ) (1,192 ) Finance
and insurance (802 ) (237
Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite ) (802 ) (237 ) Corporate
and other (250 ) (119 ) Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05
(250 ) (119 ) 39,650 42,601 59,ne-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Per Month Salina, Kansas 55,988 Other expenses: Cedar Creek KS 155 58.7 % Property
management 3,006 (2) 2,075 4,759 3,054 General
and administrative 11,590 (3) 8,950 11,618 19,099 Initial
ARC public offering related costs 4,417 Early
termination of debt 13,427
$ 290 Prairie Village
25,326 24,829 42,255 32,152 Interest
expense 20,263 22,179 31,817 27,209 Total
other expenses KS 130 80.8 % 237 West Cloud
Commons KS 106 65.1 % 278 Salina, KansasTotal/Weighted Average 391 60,185 58,033 90,449 99,358 Interest
income (660 ) (698 )(5) (660 ) (792 ) Loss from
continuing operations (19,875 ) (14,374 ) (30,384 ) (42,578 ) Income
from discontinued operations 1,000 795 Loss on sale of discontinued operations (678 ) 67.8 % $ 266 Fayetteville/Springdale, Arkansas Northder:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .1pt 0pt 0pt;width:37.85pt;">
Net loss (19,875 ) (14,374 ) (30,062 ) (41,783 ) Preferred
unit distributions (5,942 ) (3,810 ) Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders $ (19,875 ) $ (14,374 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593
AR 181 89.0 % $ 229 (1) Same
communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the
Hometown, D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2004 and the
communities sold or held for sale before June 30, 2005. (2) Expense
was prorated based on 199 same communities as compared to 315 actual
communities in 2005 and 313 actual communities in 2004.
Western Park AR 113 73.5 (3) Excludes
amortization of restricted units issued in connection with ARCs IPO. (4) Excludes
restricted unit expenses of $10.1 million recognized in connection with ARCs
IPO. (5) Excludes
interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARCs IPO, the
financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition. Comparison
of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2004 Overview. Our
results for the three months ended June 30, 2005 include the operations of
communities acquired in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other 2004 acquisitions for a
full quarter, whereas our results for the three months ended June 30, 2004
include the operations of the Hometown communities but not the D.A.M.
acquisition. Revenue. Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was
$75.6 million, as compared to $55.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $20.5 million, or 37%. Rental income increased by
$3.5 million, primarily due to $3.8 million attributable to 2004 community
acquisitions partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease from same communities.
The decrease in same communities revenues primarily is due to $1.2 million from
lower occupancy partially offset by $0.7 million from 68 increased rental rates and $0.2 million from higher home
renter rental income. Revenue from the sale of manufactured homes increased by
$16.2 million as we sold 889 more homes in the second quarter of 2005 than in
the second quarter of 2004, and a greater percentage of these sales were new
homes sold at higher average selling prices. Utility and other income increased
by $0.7 million due to our 2004 community acquisitions and improved recovery of
utilities from residents. % 226 Oak Glen AR 87 85.1 % 225 Fayetteville/Springdale, ArkansasTotal/Weighted
Average Property Operations Expense. For the three months ended June 30,
2005, total property operations expense was $20.0 million, as compared to $17.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $2.4
million, or 14%. The increase primarily is due to additional expense of $1.8
million from 2004 community acquisitions and an increase of $0.6 million in
expenses in same communities. The increase in property operations expense from
same communities primarily is due to an increase in salaries and benefits of
$1.0 million, or 29%, partially offset by a decrease in repairs and maintenance
expense of $0.2 million and a decrease in utilities expense of $0.1
million. Real Estate Taxes Expense. Real estate taxes expense
for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.4 million, as
compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an
increase of $0.3 million or 8%. The increase is due primarily to our 2004 community
acquisitions. Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold. The cost of manufactured
homes sold was $16.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as
compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an
increase of $14.4 million. The increase primarily was due to the increase in
sales of manufactured homes by 889 units, as compared to the same period in
2004, as discussed above. Retail Home Sales, Finance and Insurance. For the three months ended June 30,
2005, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense
was $4.1 million as compared to $1.5 million for three months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $2.6 million. This increase is due to the increase in
manufactured homes sold and the costs associated with creating the community based
sales and finance organization. The increase is partially offset by the
elimination of the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores. Property Management Expense. Property management expense
for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $2.5 million, as compared to
$1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of
$0.9 million, or 56%. The increase primarily is due to the expansion in
2004 from seven to 12 district offices in 2004 and the related staffing costs
for the new districts in connection with the 2004 community acquisitions and
the resultant increase in our community portfolio. General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $6.-weight:bold;"> 381 Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $22.2
million, as compared to $17.2 million for the three months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $5.0 million, or 29%. The increase primarily is due to
increased depreciation on communities acquired in our 2004 acquisitions. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 was $16.5 million, as compared to $12.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $3.8
million, or 30%. The increase is due to a higher outstanding average debt
balance of approximately $178 million, as well as higher effective weighted
average interest rates on our variable rate debt. Net Loss Attributable to Partners. As a result of the
foregoing, our net loss attributable to our partners was $19.2 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $7.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $11.6 million or 154%. 69 83.5 % $ 228 Naples, Florida Overview. Our results for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 include the operations of communities acquired
in the Hometown, D.A.M. and other 2004 acquisitions for a full six-month
period, whereas our results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 include
the operations of the Hometown communities from the date of acquisition, February 18,
2004, through June 30, 2004, but not the D.A.M. acquisition. Revenue. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was
$140.2 million, as compared to $98.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $42.1 million, or 43%. Rental income increased by
$16.0 million, primarily due to $16.4 million from 2004 acquisitions
partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease from same communities. The
decrease in same communities revenues primarily is due to $2.7 million from
lower occupancy partially offset by $1.4 million from increased rental rates
and $0.9 million from higher home renter rental income. Revenue from the
sale of manufactured homes increased by $23.5 million as we sold 1,648 more
homes than in the first six months of 2004, and a greater percentage of these
sales were new homes sold at higher average selling prices. Utility and other
income increased by $2.4 million due to our 2004 acquisitions and improved recovery
of utilities from residents. Property Operations Expense. For the six months ended June 30,
2005, total property operations expense was $40.4 million, as compared to $30.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of
$10.2 million, or 34%. The increase primarily is due to additional expense
of $8.1 million from 2004 community acquisitions and an increase of $2.1
million in expenses in same communities. The increase in property operations
expense from same communities primarily is due to an increase in salaries and
benefits of $1.8 million, or 26%, an increase in utilities expense of $0.2
million, or 100%, and an increase in insurance expense of $0.1 million, or
23.6%. Real Estate Taxes Expense. Real estate taxes expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $8.7 million, as compared
to $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of
$1.3 million or 18%. The increase is due primarily to our 2004
acquisitions. Retail Home Sales, Finance and Insurance. For the six months ended June 30, 2005,
total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was
$7.3 million, as compared to $2.1 million for six months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $5.2 million. This increase is due to the increase in
manufactured homes sold and the costs associated with creating the community
based sales and finance organization. The increase is partially offset by the
elimination of the costs of maintaining stand-alone retail stores. Property Management Expense. Property management expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.8 million, as compared to
$3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1.7
million, or 56%. The increase primarily is due to the expansion in 2004 from
seven to 12 district offices in 2004 and the related staffing costs for the new
districts in connection with the 2004 acquisitions and the resultant increase
in our community portfolio. General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $11.6 million, as
compared to $19.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a
decrease of $7.5 million, or 39%. The decrease primarily was due to a
non-recurring $10.1 million expense incurred in the 2004 first quarter in
conjunction with ARCs IPO in whichavoid;text-align:right;">
Southwind Village FL 364 87.6 % $ 399 Dubuque, Iowa Terrace Heights * IA 317 70 IPO Related Costs. During the six months ended June 30,
2004, we incurred $4.4 million in organization and other costs directly related
to ARCs IPO. These costs included legal fees, third party due diligence costs,
travel expenses, transfer taxes, filing fees and other miscellaneous items. Early Termination of Debt. During the six
months ended June 30, 2004, we wrote off $7.1 million of loan origination
costs and incurred an expense of $6.3 million related to exit fees applicable
to the repayment of debt in the financing transaction. Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $42.3
million, as compared to $32.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2004, an increase of $10.1 million, or 31%. The increase primarily is due to
increased depreciation on communities acquired in our 2004 acquisitions. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 was $31.8 million, as compared to $27.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $4.6 million, or
17%. The increase is due to a higher outstanding average debt balance of
approximately $161.0 million, as well as higher effective weighted average
interest rates on our variable rate debt. Preferred Unit Distributions. As of June 30, 2005,
the ARC board of directors had declared quarterly distributions of $0.5156 on
each of the 5,000,000 outstanding Series A preferred partnership units and
$0.39 on each of the combined 1,005,688 outstanding Series B and C
preferred partnership units, paid April 29, 2005, and July 29, 2005,
for a combined $5.9 million of preferred unit distributions for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. For the second quarter of 2004 the distribution
declared and paid also was $0.5156 per unit on the Series A preferred
partnership units, or $2.6 million, however, for the quarter ended March 31,
2004, the distribution declared was $0.4182 per unit, or $1.2 million prorated
from funding of the IPO on February 18, 2004. No Series B and C
preferred unit distributions were declared in the six months ended June 30,
2004. Preferred unit distributions totaled $3.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2004. Net Loss Attributable to Partners. As a result of the
foregoing, our net loss attributable to our partners was $36.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $45.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $9.6 million or 21%. Our net
loss attributable to our partners for the six months ended June 30, 2004
includes $27.9 million of costs related to ARCs IPO, the related financing
transaction and the Hometown acquisition including: (1) $10.1 million from
restricted unit grants; (2) $4.4 million from IPO related
organization and other costs; and (3) $13.4 million from the early
termination of debt. Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Overview. Our results from continuing
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2003, include the continuing operations of 76
communities acquired from Hometown, comprising 22,970 homesites, from the date
of acquisition, February 18, 2004, through December 31, 2004 and,
accordingly, are not included in our operations for the first year of 2003. Our
results for the year ended December 31, 2004 also include the operations
of 36 communities acquired from D.A.M. comprising 3,573 homesites from the date
of acquisition, June 30, 2004, through December 31, 2004 and six
other acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2004 and December 31,
2004, that accordingly, are not included in our operations for the year ended December 31,
2003. Revenue. 77.9 % Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
$222.7 million, as compared to $163.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2003, an increase of $59.5 million, or 36%. This increase is due to an
increase of $61.4 million in rental income offset by a decrease of
$1.9 million in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes,
utility and other income and net consumer finance interest income. 71 The rental income increase of $61.4 million is due to
$53.0 million from the Hometown acquisition, $6.5 million from other
community acquisitions and $1.9 million from same communities. The
increase in same communities revenues is due to $4.6 million from
increased rental rates and $4.9 million from home renter rental income
partially offset by $7.6 million attributable to lower occupancy. The decrease in other income of $1.9 million is due to
a $6.5 million decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by
an increase of $4.6 million in utility and other income and net consumer
finance interest income. Sales of manufactured homes were 1,387 units in 2004
and 490 units in 2003. We closed 19 retail dealerships in 2003. Per unit sales
prices were substantially lower during the year ended December 31, 2004,
as compared to the same period in 2003, primarily because 2004 sales were of
older homes. Property Operations Expense. For the year ended December 31,
2004, total property operations expenses were $75.2 million, as compared
to $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$30.9 million, or 70%. The increase is due primarily to increases in
expenses of $22.1 million from the Hometown acquisition, $4.1 million
from D.A.M. and other community acquisitions and $3.7 million from same
communities. The increase from same communities is due primarily to higher
salaries and benefits of $2.2 million and higher repairs and maintenance
of $2.1 million. Real Estate Taxes Expense. Real estate taxes expense
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $16.6 million, as compared
to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$6.4 million or 63%. The increase is due primarily to the Hometown
acquisition, other community acquisitions and an increase in same communities
in the number of rental homes we own. Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold. The cost of manufactured
homes sold was $18.3&nbce="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> $ 285 Waterloo, Iowa sp;million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a
decrease of $0.1 million. The decrease was a result of the mix of used
versus new homes sold during the period. The gross margin in manufactured homes
sold decreased to a loss of 20% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
a gross profit of 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as per unit
sales prices were substantially lower during the year ended December 31,
2004, primarily because 2004 sales were of older homes. Retail Home Sales, Finance, Insurance and Other Operations
Expense. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, total retail home sales, finance,
insurance and other operations expense was $8.2 million, as compared to
$7.4 million for year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $0.8 million,
or 11%. This increase is due to costs of in-community sales activities begun in
the second half of 2004 partially offset by the elimination of the costs of
maintaining stand-alone retail stores. Property Management Expense. Property management expense
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $7.1 million, as compared to
$5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$1.6 million, or 29%. The increase is due primarily to the expansion from
seven to 12 district offices and the related staffing costs for the new
districts in connection with the Hometown and D.A.M. acquisitions and the
resultant increase in our community portfolio. General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative
expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $29.4 million, as
compared to $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an
increase of $12.5 million, or 74%. The increase primarily was due to a
one-time charge to salaries and Cedar Knoll
72 IPO Related Costs. During the year ended December 31,
2004, we incurred $4.4 million in organization and other costs directly
related to ARCs IPO. These costs included legal fees, third party due
diligence costs, travel expenses, transfer taxes, filing fees and other miscellaneous
items. Early Termination of Debt. During the year ended December 31,
2004, we wrote off $10.4 million of loan origination costs and incurred an
expense of $6.3 million related to exit fees applicable to the repayment of
debt in the financing transaction. Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $72.0
million, as compared to $46.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2003, an increase of $25.5 million, or 55%. The increase is due to increased
depreciation of communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, other
community acquisitions, manufactured home acquisitions and an increase in
amortization of loan origination costs resulting from recognition of costs to
be paid for the consumer finance facility resulting from the lease recize="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> IA 290 95.5 % $ 214 El Paso, Texas Real Estate and Retail Home Asset Impairment. During the year ended December 31,
2004, we recognized $3.6 million of impairment charges, as compared to
$1.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. The
charge in 2004 related to $3.0 million of impairment charges from older
vacant homes that we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less than their carrying
value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific markets and reduce
repair and maintenance costs in the rental home portfolio and approximately
$500,000 of impairment charges related to three communities whose estimated
fair value was less than their carrying values. The charge in 2003 related to
our decision in 2003 to change from selling homes in stand-alone retail
dealerships to in-community sales operations. Goodwill Impairment. During the year ended December 31,
2004, we recognized $0.9 million of goodwill impairment charges related to
our insurance business, reducing goodwill in our insurance business to zero. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the
year ended December 31, 2004 was $56.9 million, as compared to
$57.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of
$500,000. The decrease is primarily due to the increase in outstanding debt
related to the Hometown acquisition and the related refinancing activities offset
by lower interest rates and interest we capitalized related to the development
of long-lived assets. Interest Income. Interest earned on notes
receivable, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and loan reserves was
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Discontinued Operations. In the third quarter, we
entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12 communities
and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a sales
agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek communities. In
the fourth quarter we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell an
additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we
sold the Sunrise Mesa community. During the year ended December 31, 2004,
we have reflected $1.9 million of income from the operation of these
assets and $8.5 million of loss on the sale of these assets as
discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we have
reflected $31,000 of income from the operation of these assets and
$3.3 million of gain on the sale of these assets as discontinued
operations. Preferred Unit Dividend. We have recorded a preferred
unit dividend at the annual rate of 8.25% or $2.0625 per share on the
5.0 million units of Series A preferred partnership units issued in
connection with the IPO on February 18, 2004. Net Loss Attributable to Common Partnership Unitholders. As a result of the
foregoing, our net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders was
$101.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to
$39.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$61.4 million. Our net 73 loss attributable to common partnership unitholders for the
year ended December 31, 2004 includes $31.2 million of costs related
to ARCs IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition including (a) $10.1 million
from restricted unit grants, (b) $4.4 million from IPO related
organization and other costs and (c) $16.7 million from the early
termination of debt. The following tables present
certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 on a historical and Same Communities
basis. Same Communities reflects information for all communities owned by us
at both January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004. Same Communities
does not include the Hometown acquisition, the D.A.M. portfolio acquisition,
the nine other communities we acquired subsequent to January 1, 2003 or
the communities sold during 2003 and 2004 or held for sale as of December 31,
2004 (in thousands, except home, occupancy, community and per unit
information). Same Communities(4) Real Estate Segment(4) 2004 2003 2004 2003 For the year
ended December 31: Mission Estates * TX 286 67.8 % $ 298 Elmira, New York Average total homesites 36,925 36,903 58,349 37,316 Average total rental homes 6,299 4,972 7,560 5,183 Average occupied homesiteshomeowners 26,699 28,923 43,318 Collingwood MHP * NY 101 79.2 % $ 218 Crestview PA 97
29,281 Average occupied homesitesrental homes 4,545 3,744 5,133 3,695 Average total occupied homesites 31,244 32,667 48,451 32,976 Average occupancyrental homes 55.7 %
72.2 % 75.3 % 67.9 % 71.3 % Average occupancytotal 84.6 % 88.5 % 83.0 % 88.4 % For the year
ended December 31: Real
estate revenue Homeowner rental income $ 90,571 $ 93,871 $ 145,839 $ 94,591 Home renter rental income 35,767 30,894 40,330 31,157 Other 482 171 1,098 167 Rental income 230 Chelsea PA 84 84.5 %
126,820 124,936 187,267 125,915 Utility and other income 13,334 13,387 19,423 13,487 256 Elmira, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average Total real estate revenue 140,154 138,323 206,690 139,402 Real
estate expenses
282 72.7 % $ 234 Bloombsburg, Pennsylvania Property operations expenses 48,530 44,782 75,159 45,181 Real estate taxes Brookside Village11,766 PA 171 81.9 % $ 235 Pleasant View
Estates PA 108 69.4 % 242 Bloombsburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 279 77.1 % $ 237 Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New York 10,041 16,597 10,137 Total real estate expenses 60,296 54,823 91,756 55,318 Real estate net segment income
Forest Park $ 79,858 $<"Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> NY 183 99.5 % 83,500 $ 114,934 $ 84,084 $ 357 Birch Meadows Average t 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">
$ 374 $ 353 $ 355 NY 62 98.4 % 372 $ 352 Average monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner
occupied homesite(2) $ 283 $ 270 $
Park D'Antoine NY $ 269 Average monthly real estate revenue per total homesite(3) $ 316 $ 312 $ 17 94.1 % 269 295 $ 311 As of
December 31: Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New YorkTotal/Weighted
Average 262 Total communities 196 196 315 199 98.9 % $ 354
Total homesites 36,925 36,923 63,661 37,552 Tanglewood * TX
Occupied homesites 30,631 262 77.1 % $ 301 104 Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 31,814 51,913 32,190 Total rental homes owned 6,424 5,492 8,286 5,558 Occupied
rental homes 4,924 4,091 6,005 4,114 (1) Average
monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite is defined as total real
estate revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the
number of months in the period. 74 (2) Average
monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite is defined as
homeowner rental income divided by average homeowner occupied homesites divided
by the number of months in the period. (3) Average
monthly real estate revenue per total homesite is defined as total real estate
revenue divided by average total homesites divided by the number of months in
the period. (4) Real
estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations through
December 31, 2004. Reconciliation of our net segment
income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Same Communities(1) As Reported 2004
Carsons PA 130 86.2 % $ 213 Valley ViewChambersburg 2004
PA 100 87.0 % 198 Green Acres PA 24 2003 Net segment income: Real
estate $ 79,858 $ 83,500 $ 114,934 $ 84,084 100.0 % 211 Chambersburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 254 (2) 87.8 % $ 207 Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania (2) (9,683 ) (1,772 ) Insurance (638 ) 1,071 (638 ) 1,071 Corporate
and other (192 ) (469 ) (192 ) (469 ) 79,028 84,102 104,421
82,914 Other expenses: Property
management 5,685 (4) 5,527 7,127 Frieden Manor 5,527 General
and administrative 19,241 (3) 16,855 29,361 PA 193 85.5 % $ 240 Pine Terrace * PA 25 72.0 16,855 ARC IPO
related costs 4,417 Early
termination of debt 16,685 Real estate
and retail home sales asset 3,591 3,591 1,385 Goodwill
impairment 863 Depreciation
and amortization 48,116 45,394 72,014 46,467 Interest
expense 41,651 % 214 Schuylkill Haven, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 218
56,521 56,892 57,386 % $ 238 Total
other expenses 118,284 124,297 190,950 127,620 Interest income (1,523 )(5) (1,439 ) (1,616 ) (1,439 Hays, Kansas
) Loss from
continuing operations (37,733 ) (38,756 ) (84,913 ) (43,267 ) Income from discontinued operations 1,915 31 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations (8,549 ) 3,333 Net loss (37,733 ) (38,756 ) (91,547 ) (39,903 ) Preferred unit distributions (9,752 ) Countryside KS 212 Net loss attributable to common unitholders $ (37,733 ) $ (38,756 ) $ 80.2 % $ 253 Western Slope of Colorado (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) (1) Same
communities information excludes results of communities acquired in the Hometown,
D.A.M. and other acquisitions after January 1, 2003 and the communities
sold or held for sale before December 31, 2004. (2) Excludes
segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in
which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1,
2003 at which time we had ">
Picture Ranch * CO 114 (4) Excludes
property management expenses incurred in connection with the Hometown
acquisition. (5) Excludes
interest earned on additional cash received in connection with ARCs IPO, the
financing transaction and the Hometown acquisition. 75 Comparison
of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002 Overview. Our results for the year
ended December 31, 2003, as compared to the year ended December 31,
2002 include the operations of the 107 communities comprising 20,511 homesites
and the retail home sales, insurance, consumer finance and other businesses we
acquired in the reorganization for the entire year ended December 31, 2003
and for approximately eight months for the year ended December 31, 2002.
In addition to the effects of the reorganization, our results for the year
ended December 31, 2003 also reflect the effects on our operations of the
22 community acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2002 and December 31,
2003 and exclude the 30 communities that we discontinued in the third and
fourth quarters of 2004. Revenue. Revenue for the year ended December 31,
2003 was $163.2 million, as compared to $136.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $26.7, or 20%. This increase was
due to an increase of $33.3 million in rental income and a decrease of $6.6 million
in other revenue consisting of sales of manufactured homes and utility and
other income. Rental
income increased by $33.3 million, consisting of $20.8 from the
communities acquired in the reorganization, $8.0 million from other
community acquisitions and $4.5 million from same communities. The
increase in same communities revenues consists of $4.2 million from
increased rental rates, $3.1 million from home renter rental income
partially offset by $2.8 million from lower occupancy. The
decrease in other income of $6.6 million is due to a $10.3 million
decrease in sales of manufactured homes partially offset by a $3.7 million
increase in utility and other income. Property Operations Expense. For the year ended December 31,
2003, total property operations expense was $44.3 million, as compared to
$33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of
$11.0 million, or 33%. The increase was due to increases in expenses of
$7.8 million from communities we acquired in the reorganization,
$3.1 million from other community acquisitions and $1.0 million from
same communities. The increase on a same community basis was due primarily to
higher salaries and benefits of $513,000, due to increased staffing and, to a
lesser extent, increases in wages and employee benefits and higher bad debt
expense of $478,000, as a result of increased tenant defaults caused by general
economic conditions and reserves for rent owed by certain finance companies
which own repossessed homes in our communities. Real Estate Taxes Expense. Real estate taxes expense
for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $10.2 million, as compared
to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of
$3.6 million, or 55%. The increase was due primarily to communities we
acquired in the reorganization, other community acquisitions and an increase in
the number of rental homes we own. Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold. The cost of manufactured
homes sold was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
compared to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of $7.4 million, or 29%. The decrease was due primarily to a 121 unit
decrease in sales of manufactured homes from 629 units sold for the year ended December 31,
2002 to 508 units sold for the year ended December 31, 2003, partially
offset by the inclusion of the results of the retail home sales business we
acquired in the reorganization for the entire year in 2003. The gross margin for
manufactured homes sold was 15% for the year ended December 31, 2003 and
19% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Retail Home Sales, Finance,
Insurance and Other Operations Expense. For the year ended December 31,
2003, total retail home sales, finance, insurance and other operations expense was
$7.4 million, as compared to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2002, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 14%. This decrease is due to lower
sales of manufactured homes and a lower cost structure as a result of
eliminating the costs of maintaining stand">
93.9 % $ 257 76 resulting from the inclusion of results of the retail home
sales business we acquired in the reorganization for the entire period in 2003
as compared to eight months for 2002. Property Management Expense. Property management expense
for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.5 million, as compared to
$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of
$1.4 million, or 34%. The increase was due primarily to inclusion of the
results of the communities we acquired in the reorganization for an entire year
in 2003. General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative
expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $16.9 million, as
compared to $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an
increase of $3.8 million, or 29%. The increase was due primarily to the
reorganization, a $900,000 one time charge for vacating unused office space, a
non-recurring credit of $291,000 against our insurance expenses in 2002, and,
in 2003, to higher professional services expenses related primarily to our
manufactured home acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenue, general and
administrative expense was 10% for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
compared to 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Depreciation and Amortization
Expense.
The Vineyards * CO 97 91.8 % 316 Western Slope of ColoradoTotal/Weighted
Average Retail Home Sales and Insurance
Asset and Goodwill Impairment and Other Expense. At the time of the
reorganization, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale
of manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone
retail dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the
industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of
manufactured n" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 211 92.9 % $ 283 In
connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million,
net of sales proceeds of $1.3 million, to write off fixed assets and to
record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we
closed in 2003. At December 31,
2002, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales, finance
and insurance operations of $13.6 million. The impairment for the retail
home sales and finance operations arose from a deterioration of its operating
performance subsequent to the reorganization due to lower projected sales
volumes caused by adverse market conditions of the manufactured home sales
industry as a whole, the related finance industry, and the market for
manufactured home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance operation
arose because the insurance operation derives the majority of its revenue from
the retail home sales and finance operations. We had no impairment of goodwill
for the year ended December 31, 2003. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the
year ended December 31, 2003 was $57.4 million, as compared to
$43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of
$13.6 million, or 31%. The increase was due primarily to: additional
indebtedness acquired in the reorganization of 77 $380.8 million, additional borrowings of
$27.0 million under the rental home credit facility, $20.0 million
under the preferred interest, $18.8 million under the BFND credit
facility, and $4.3 million of indebtedness assumed in connection with
community acquisitions. Such interest expense increases resulting from
additional borrowings were partially offset by lower interest rates on variable
rate debt. Interest Income. Interest earned on notes
receivable, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and loan reserves was
$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Discontinued Operations. In the third quarter of
2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell a total of 12
communities and two parcels of land. In addition, we separately entered into a
sales agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden Point and Butler Creek
communities. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we entered into agreements to sell
an additional 15 communities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we
sold the Sunrise Mesa community. During the
year ended December 31, 2003, we have reflected $31,000 of income from the
operation of these assets and $3.3 million gain on the sale of the Sunrise
Mesa community sale as discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31,
2002, we have reflected $1.0 million of income from the operation of these
assets as discontinued operations.
Somerset, Pennsylvania 78 The following tables present
certain information relative to our real estate segment as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 on a historical and Same Communities
basis. Same Communities reflects information for all communities owned by us
at both January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. Same Communities
does not include the twenty-two communities we acquired subsequent to January 1,
2003 or the community sold during 2003 (in thousands, except home, occupancy,
community, and per unit information). Same
Real Estate 2003 2002 Sunny Acres 2003 2002 For the year ended December 31: Average
total homesites 15,717 15,824 37,316 27,463 Average
total rental homes 1,812 1,333 PA 207 96.6 % $ 227 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 5,183 2,626 Average
occupied homesiteshomeowners 13,030 13,785 29,281 Suburban Estates PA 24,895 Average
occupied homesitesrental homes 1,376 908 3,695
202 93.1 % $ 223 Los Alamos, New Mexico 1,830 Average
total occupied homesites 14,406 14,693 32,976 26,725 Average
occupancyrental homes 76.0
% 68.1 % 71.3 % 69.7 % Average occupancytotal Royal Crest * NM 178 78.1 % % 92.9 % 88.4 % 97.3 % For the year ended
December 31:
$ 473 Killeen-Temple, Texas Real estate revenue Homeowner
rental income $ 48,749 $ 47,479 $ 94,591 $ 72,476 Home
renter rental income 10,760 7,695 31,157 19,865 Other 104 (39 ) Bluebonnet
Estates * TX 173 75.1 % $ 330 Lancaster, Pennsylvania
167 (167 ) Rental
income 59,613 55,135 125,915 92,174 Utility
and other income 6,088 5,095 13,487 10,147 Total
real estate revenue 65,701 60,230 139,402 102,321 Real estate expenses Property
operations expenses 19,151 18,165 45,181 Valley ViewEphrata PA 149 98.7 % $
33,320 Real
estate taxes 4,566 3,681 10,137 6,671 Total
real estate expenses 23,717 21,846 55,318 39,991 Real
estate net segment income $ 41,984 $ 38,384 $ 84,084 $ 62,330 Average
monthly real estate revenue per total occupied homesite(1) $ 380 $ Binghamton, New York 342 $ 352 $ 319 Average
monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite(2)
Blue Ridge MHP * NY 68 $ 312 $ 287 $ 269
89.7 % $ 230 Kintner Estates $ 243 Average monthly real estate revenue per total $ 348 $ 317 $ 311 $ 310 As of December 31: Total
communities owned 203 * NY 55 94.5 % 252 Binghamton, New YorkTotal/Weighted
Average 123 91.9 % $ 240 Cambridge, Maryland Beaver Run MD 119 &nbs="border:none;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">
203 329 209 Total
homesites 15,735 15,668 37,552 36,805 Occupied
homesites 14,095 14,593 32,190 33,097 Total
rental homes owned 2,012 1,636 5,558 4,423 Occupied rental homes 1,503 1,197 4,114 3,002 (1) Average
monthly real estate revenue per occupied homesite defined as total real estate
revenue divided by average total occupied homesites divided by the number of
months in the period. 79 (2) Average
monthly homeowner rental income per homeowner occupied homesite defined as
homeowner rental income dividp; 100.0 % $ 229 (4) Real
estate segment and homesite data excludes discontinued operations. A reconciliation of our net segment
income to net loss attributable to common unitholders is as follows: Twelve Months Ended December 31, Same As Reported 105 2002 2003 2002 Net segment income:
Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Real
estate $ 41,984 (1) $ 38,384 (1) $ 84,084 $ 62,330 Retail
home sales and finance (2) (2) (1,772 ) 230 Insurance 1,071 204 1,071 204 Corporate
and other (469 ) (652 ) (469 ) (652 ) 42,586 37,936 t-align:center;"> Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Reading, Pennsylvania Valley ViewReading (Tuckerton) * PA 69 89.9 % $ 315 Valley ViewFleetwood * PA 62,112 Other expenses: Property
management 5,527 4,105 5,527 4,105 General
and administrative 16,855 13,087 16,855 13,087
30 Retail
home sales asset impairment 1,385 Goodwill
impairment 93.3 % 305 Valley ViewWernersville * PA 23 87.0 % 287 Reading, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 122 13,557 Depreciation
and amortization 18,652 19,766 46,467 37,058 Interest
expense 16,021 7,026 57,386 43,804 Total
other expenses 57,055 43,984 127,620 111,611 Interest income 90.2 % $ 307 Laramie, Wyoming Breazeale WY 117 96.6 % $ 312
(1,439 ) (1,390 ) (1,439 ) (1,390 ) Loss from
continuing operations (13,030 ) (4,658 ) (43,267 ) (48,109 ) Income from discontinued operations Farmington, New Mexico Sunset Mobile
Village * NM 112 94.6 % 31 1,040 Gain on sale of discontinued operations 3,333 Net loss attributable to common partnership unitholders $ (13,030 ) $ (4,658 ) $ 262 Harrisburg/Lebanon/Carlisle, Pennsylvania (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) (1) Same
communities real estate net segment income excludes results of communities
acquired after January 1, 2002 and community sold before December 31,
2003. (2) Excludes
segment results as a result of the restructuring in September 2003 in
which we closed all stand-alone retail stores existing on January 1,
2003 at which time we had no significant in-community sales operations. Liquidity
and Capital Resources Our
principal liquidity demands have historically been, and, to a greater or lesser
degree depending on the nature of the expenditures, are expected to continue to be, recurring and
non-recurring capital improvements of communities, debt repayment, the
purchase of new and used homes for lease and sale, funding loans to home
buyers, property acquisitions, and partnership interest distributions. We
intend to meet these liquidity requirements through our working capital
provided by operating activities, available financing under our floor plan line
of credit for home purchases, our consumer finance facility to fund home loans,
our lease receivables line of credit to be secured by homes in our rental
portfolio, other available unsecured financing, and the potential net proceeds
from the sale of communities. We consider these sources to be adequate to meet
all operating requirements, including recurring capital improvements, debt
service, other normally recurring expenditures of a capital nature and, if
necessary and 80 appropriate, payment of dividends to ARCs stockholders to
maintain qualification as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Our
operating cash flows have not been sufficient to cover the distributions to our
partners that were made since ARCs IPO in February 2004. On May 23,
2005, we declared a reduced distribution to our partners for the second quarter
of 2005. On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors announced that no
distributions would be made on the Partnerships common partnership units for
third quarter of 2005. ARCs board of directors reviews our practices with
respect to the payment of distributions on a quarterly basis. Should our
operating cash flows not improve, we may need to take additional action with
respect to the payment of distributions, which may include the further
reduction or elimination of our distributions to our partners. Our plan is
to increase occupancy through the following activities, as well as other
initiatives that may be available to us. To accomplish our plans and objectives
for the next 12 months, we may invest significant funds for the purchase
of manufactured homes for sale, rent and lease with option to purchase. We
expect to commit to these expenditures only as demand warrants and funds permit
and we have entered into no significant forward purchase commitments with
respect to such purchases. We also plan to make recurring capital expenditures,
as necessary and appropriate, to keep our communities up to our standards and
for general capital improvements. We expect
to fund our short-term liquidity needs through net cash provided by operations,
borrowings under our $50 million floorplan line of c;">
Monroe Valley PA 44 100.0 We have
extended the maturity date of our $85 million revolving credit mortgage
facility to September 2006, and expect to refinance or extend our senior
variable rate mortgage when due in 2006. In addition to our existing sources of
capital, we have significant experience in raising private equity and we may in
the future use that experience to enter into financing joint ventures or other
similar arrangements if we determine that such a structure would provide an
efficient means of raising capital. Not withstanding the foregoing and based on our historical
results, we do not believe that we will be able to fully fund our debt service
obligations and recurring capital expenditures, as well as our operating plans
and objectives described above, out of operating cash flows. Accordingly, our
ability to implement our plans and occupancy objectives described above will
depend upon our ability to obtain adequate funding from the financing sources
described above or from other available funding sources. We cannot assure that
we will be able to sell any or all of the 79 communities currently held
for sale or additional communities, sell new or used homes, borrow under our
consumer finance line of credit, refinance expiring credit lines or make other
arrangements necessary to fund some or all of our activities to increase
occupancy. Should we not be able to obtain sufficient funds for these purposes,
we may determine that it is necessary to substantially defer or eliminate some
or all of our plans and growth objectives that require these funds,dding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">
% $ 252 Total / Weighted
Average 81 Comparison
of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Six Months Ended June 30,
2004 Cash
provided by operations was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005, as compared with $19.0 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease
in cash provided by operations primarily was due to payments made in the first
half of 2005 for substantial accruals incurred at the end of 2004 for capital
expenditures and repairs and maintenance activities as compared to a relatively
low level of such payments in the first half of 2004. Cash used
in investing activities was $39.2 million in the six months ended June 30,
2005, compared with $576.8 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in
cash used in investing activities primarily was due to the Hometown and D.A.M.
portfolio acquisitions in the first half of 2004, as well as proceeds from
community sales in the first half of 2005. Purchases and sales of homes are
included in investing activities as these assets are considered by the company
to be long-term revenue generating assets. Cash provided by financing activities was $18.0 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $579.0 million for the
same period in 2004. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities
primarily was due to the issuance of additional indebtedness and common and
preferred unit issuances in connection with ARCs IPO in the first half of
2004, as well as increases in the repayment of existing indebtedness and
distribution payments in the first half of 2005. Comparison
of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31,
2003 Cash
provided by operations was $27.0 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operations for
2004 as compared to 2003 was due primarily to increased homesites resulting
from our Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions. Cash used
in investing activities was $607.6 million and $47.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared
to 2003 was due primarily to the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions and
an increase in acquisitions of other communities and manufactured homes.
Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing activities as these
assets are considered by the company to be long-term revenue generating assets. Cash provided by financing activities was $593.8 million
and $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to
issuance of additional indebtedness and common and preferred partnership unit
issuances in connection with ARCs IPO, partially offset by the repayment of
existing indebtedness and the payment of both common and preferred unit
distributions. Comparison
of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31,
2002 Cash
provided by operations was $10.7 million and $14.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease for 2003 was due primarily to changes
in operating assets and liabilities partially offset bgin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;"> Cash used
in investing activities was $47.7 million and $137.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in 2003 compared to
2002 was due primarily to reduced levels of community acquisitions and rental
home purchases. Purchases and sales of homes are included in investing
activities as these assets are considered by the company to be long-term
revenue generating assets. Cash provided by financing activities was $25.4 million and
$137.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. The decrease in 2003 as compared to 2002 was primarily due to
lower borrowing for community acquisitions and rental homes, funds provided in
2002 from the 82 reorganization and issuance of
common partnership units, partially offset by funding of the rental home credit
facility in 2003. Inflation in the U.S. has been relatively low in recent
years and did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 or the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003. Although the impact of inflation has been relatively
insignificant in recent years, it remains a factor in the United States economy
and may increase the cost of acquiring or replacing property, plant, and
equipment and the costs of labor and utilities. At June 30, 2005, adjusted for the effect of the
offering of the notes, we had $1,049.3 million of pro forma consolidated
indebtedness outstanding with the following repayment obligations (in
thousands): 62,942 84.5 % $ 326 On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors
authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all
communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities
that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy
objectives. See Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated
Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma
Financial Data for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and
ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes. We compete with other owners and operators of manufactured
home communities, as well as owners, operators and suppliers of alternative
forms of housing such as multifamily housing and site-built homes, including
rental properties. All of our properties are located in markets that include
other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home
communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability
to sell our homes or homesites, lease our homes or homesites and to maintain or
raise rents. In addition, our communities generally are located in developed
areas that include other competitive housing alternatives, such as apartments,
land available for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established
communities and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more
favorable financing alternatives for the same. The availability of these
competing housing options in the markets in which we operate could have a
material effect on our occupancy and rents. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to
Our Properties and Operations. With respect to acquisitions, we may compete
with numerous other potential buyers (some with potentially greater resources
or superior information), which could drive up acquisition costs and/or impede
our ability to acquire additional communities at acceptable prices. We believe we currently have a leading market share in 15
of our top 20 markets, which collectively represent approximately 69% of our
total homesites and 73% of our total rental income. Generally, manufactured home communities are subject to
various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to
recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other 106 common areas. Each state and, in
some instances, individual municipalities, have enacted laws that govern the
relationships between landlord and tenants. Changes in any of these laws or
regulations, as well as changes in laws increasing the potential liability for
environmental conditions or circumstances existing on properties or laws
affecting development, construction, operation, upkeep and safety requirements
may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of homesites or
other impairments to operations, which would adversely affect our cash flows
from operating activities. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Properties
and Operations. The Federal Fair Housing Act, its state law counterparts
and the regulations promulgated by HUD and various state agencies, prohibit
discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin,
religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living
with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women and people securing custody of
children under 18) and handicap (disability) and, in some states, on
financial capability. A failure to comply with these laws in our operations
could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could
result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which
could have an adverse effect on our cash flows fro;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Debt Operating Repayment Lease Total Obligations A variety of laws affect the sale of manufactured homes on
credit, including the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act
(Truth-in-Lending), Regulation Z, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act
and the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as well as similar state laws or
regulations. The Federal Trade Commission has issued or proposed various Trade
Regulation Rules dealing with unfair credit practices, collection efforts,
preservation of consumers claims and defenses and the like. A variety of laws affect lease with option to purchase
arrangements for manufactured homes, including Regulation M, as well as
similar state laws. We have developed a lease with option to purchase program
which seeks to comply with these laws, but there is little or no application,
interpretation or precedent with respect to the application of these laws to
our program. A failure to comply with these laws could result in significant
costs of bringing our program into compliance, legal actions and limitations or
restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse
affect on our cash flows from operations. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA,
all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal
requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements
became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws
also exist that may require modifications to the properties, or restrict
certain further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled
persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA,
requires apartment properties first occupied after march 13, 1990 to be
accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could
result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants
and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature and in
substantial capital expenditures. To the extent our properties are not in
compliance, we are likely to incur additional costs to comply with the ADA, the
FHAA or other legislation. Obligations 2005 $ 107,101 $ 756 $ 107,857 Insurance activities are subject to state insurance laws
and regulations as determined by the particular insurance commissioner for each
state in accordance with the McCarran-Ferguson Act, as well as subject to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Property management activities are often subject to state
real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real
estate commission for each state. 107 Changes in any of the laws governing our conduct could have
an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business or could materially
affect our financial position, operating income, expense or cash flow. Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and
regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured
home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing
restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain
circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusalign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">
2006(1) 122,455 109 122,564 2007 43,046 112 43,158 2008 65,765 56 65,821 2009 97,463 18 97,481 Thereafter 609,259 Under federal, state and local environmental regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to
investigate and clean up a release of hazardous substances at such property,
and may, under such laws and common law, be held liable for property damage and
other costs incurred by third parties in connection with such releases. The
liability under certain of these laws has been interpreted to be joint and
several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for
allocation of responsibility. The failure to properly remediate the property
may also adversely affect the owners ability to lease, sell or rent the
property or to borrow using the property as collateral. In connection with the
ownership, operation and management of our properties, we could be legally
responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our
properties or properties that we may acquire or manage in the future. We
conduct an environmental review of each property prior to acquisition. We have
obtained Phase I reviews on all but one of our properties and are not aware of
any environmental issues that may materially impact the operations of any
communities. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Properties and Operations. We believe that our properties are covered by adequate
fire, flood and property insurance as well as commercial liability insurance
provided by reputable companies and with commercially reasonable deductibles
and limits. Furthermore, we believe our businesses and business assets are
likewise adequately insured against casualty loss and third-party liabilities. Changes
in the insurance market since September 11, 2001, have caused significant
increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have increased the risk that
affordable insurance may not be available in the future.
609,259 Commitments 1,045,089 1,051 1,046,140 Unamortized premium related to indebtedness assumed in
Hometown and DAM acquisitions 4,251 4,251 $ 1,049,340 Our employees are all employed by our management services
subsidiary and perform various property management, maintenance, acquisition,
renovation and management functions. As of June 30, 2005, our 108 management services subsidiary had
1,167 full-time equivalent employees. None of the employees is represented by a
union. We are a party to various legal
actions resulting from our operating activities. These actions consist of
litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business, some of which are covered by liability insurance, and none of which
is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole. 109 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Pursuant to the Partnerships partnership agreement, ARC is
the sole general partner of the Partnership and has, subject to certain
protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and
complete responsibility and discretion in the Partnerships management and
control, including the ability to cause the Partnership to enter into certain
major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of its
assets. See Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership AgreementGeneral;
Management of the Partnership. The management and operation of the Partnership
is carried out by ARC, and the persons who perform these management and
operation functions on behalf of ARC are employees of ARCs management services subsidiary, as
permitted pursuant to the Partnerships partnership agreement. Directors and Executive Officers of
ARC The board of directors of ARC
presently consists of ten members. ARCs board is not classified and thus all
of its directors are elected annually. The directors and executive officers of
ARC are listed below. Name $ 1,051 $ 1,050,391 (1) $140.5
million of senior variable rate mortgage debt due 2006 may be extended for
three additional 12-month periods at our option and subject to certain
conditions. The fair value of debt outstanding as of June 30,
2005, adjusted for the effect of the offering of the notes, was approximately $1,076.4
million. 83 Consolidated Indebtedness to be
Outstanding After Our Offering The following table sets forth
certain information with respect0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> Age Position Larry D. Willard 63 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director James F. Kimsey 57 Amount of Percentage Weighted Scott D. Jackson 50 Vice Chairman and Director John G. Sprengle 49 Vice Chairman and Director Maturity Annual Balance at Fixed Rate Debt Eugene Mercy, Jr. 69 Director Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2009 $ 83,067
W. Joris Brinkerhoff 54 Director Gerald J. Ford 62 Director James R. Randy Staff 58 Director Carl B. Webb 55 Director J. Markham Green 7.9 % 5.05 % 2009 $
62 Director Lawrence E. Kreider 58 Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer Scott L.
Gesell 46 Executive
Vice President and General Counsel The
principal occupation and business experience for each of our officers and
directors and key employees, for at least the last five years, are as follows: Larry D. Willard, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and Director. Mr. Willard assumed the
position of ARCs Chairman and Chief Executive Offt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">5,476 $ 77,590 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2012 276,278 26.3 James F. Kimsey, President, Chief
Operating Officer and Director. Mr. Kimsey assumed the
position of ARCs President and Chief Operating Officer on September 21,
2005. Mr. Kimsey has also served as a director of ARC since June 30,
2005. Mr. Kimsey retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of 110 RailWorks Corporation in 2004, a position he had held since
2002. From 2001 through 2002 he also served as the President of Western Utility
Services on behalf of Exelon Infrastructure Services, a successor to Fischback &
Moore Electric, LLC for whom Mr. Kimsey was the President and Chief
Executive Officer from 1995 to 2001. In 1997 Mr. Kimsey founded Kimsey
Electrical Contracting, LLC, serving as its Chairman. From 1970 to 1995 he
served in various capacities with Sturgeon Electric Co., Inc, succeeding
to MYR Group President in 1984, a position he held until 1995. Mr. Kimsey
is a graduate of the University of Denver where he received a BSBA degree in
Accounting. Scott D. Jackson, Vice Chairman and
Director. Mr. Jackson
assumed the position of ARCs Vice Chairman on September 21, 2005.
Mr. Jackson also co-founded ARCs predecessor in interest in 1995 and
served as ARCs Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since ARCs inception in
1998 until he became ARCs Vice Chairman. He additionally served as ARCs
Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005.
Mr. Jackson directs ARCs sales of communities. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Jackson
served in various senior positions in financial service companies owned or
controlled by, among others, Gerald J. Ford. In these capacities, he
oversaw corporate finance activities, including financial service company
acquisition, disposition and capital financing activities. Previously, Mr. Jackson
worked in corporate finance as Vice President of Corporate Finance and served
as Co-Head of the Financial Institutions Restructuring Group for Goldman, Sachs &
Co. from 1987 to 1991; as Senior Vice President and Manager of Republic Bank
Capital Markets from 1985 to 1987; and with Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from
1979 to 1985. Mr. Jackson holds a B.S. degree in Business Finance and
Marketing from Colorado State University. John G. Sprengle, Vice Chairman and
Director. Mr. Sprengle
co-founded ARCs predecessor in interest in 1995. Mr. Sprengle has served
as a director and Vice Chairman of ARC since April 8, 2002. Mr. Sprengle has also served as ARCs
Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1999, Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to
November 1, 2004 and Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004
to March 30, 2005. Prior to 1995, Mr. Sprengle served in various
positions at BancTEXAS Group, Inc., a bank holding company. In his final
positions, he served as a Seniolign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:8.7pt;">
% 7.35 % 2012 23,480 244,675 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2014 189,522 18.1 % 5.53 % 2014 Eugene Mercy, Jr., Director. Mr. Mercy has served as
a director of ARC since April 2002. Mr. Mercy is currently a
Principal in Granite Capital International Group, a New York money management
firm, and a Senior Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Mr. Mercy is
a former Limited Partner of Goldman Sachs & Co., where he was in the
Securities Sales and Equity Trading Department and the Commercial Real Estate
Department. He later became the Partner-in-Charge of the Mortgage Securities
Department of Goldman Sachs. In 1996, Mr. Mercy was appointed to the
Goldman Sachs Limited Partner Advisory Committee, and after Goldman Sachs
successful public of:9.0pt;">13,163 179,975 Various individual fixed rate mortgages W. Joris Brinkerhoff, Director. Mr. Brinkerhoff has
served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Brinkerhoff
founded a Native American owned joint venture, Doyon LTD, in 1978 and
served as its operations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
until sellingyle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">
due 2005
through 2031 121,641 11.6 % 7.20 % 111 Alaska petroleum fields. Mr. Brinkerhoff now resides
in Denver and manages family interests including oil and gas production, a
securities portfolio and various other business interests, as well as actively
participating in numerous philanthropic organizations. Mr. Brinkerhoff is
a graduate of Montana School of Mines with a Bachelor of Science Degree in
Petroleum Engineering. Gerald J. Ford, Director. Mr. Ford has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Ford is a banking and
financial institutions entrepreneur who has been involved in numerous mergers
and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions, primarily
in the Southwest United States, over the past 30 years. In this capacity
he acquired and consolidated 30 commercial banks from 1975 to 1993, forming
First United Bank Group, Inc., a multi-bank holding company for which he
functioned as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until its sale
in 1994. During this period he also led investment consortiums that acquired
numerous financial institutions, forming in succession First Gibraltar Bank,
FSB, First Madison Bank and First Nationwide Bank. Mr. Ford also served as
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State
Bancorp Inc and California Federal Bank from 1998 to 2002. He currently
participates on numerous boards of directors, including Triad Financial
Corporation for which he is also Chairman of the Board, First Acceptance
Corporation, for which he is also Chairman of the Board, McMoRan Exploration
Co., and Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Mr. Ford holds a
Bachelors Degree in Economics, as well-break-after:avoid;"> 2005 to 2031 9,984 80,425 Senior Exchangeable
Notes due 2025 96,600 James R. Randy Staff, Director. Mr. Staff has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Staff has been a
consultant to Hunters Glen Ford, Ltd., an investment partnership, since November 2002.
He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ganado Bancshares, Inc.
(and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Citizens State Bank, Ganado, Texas) and
ABNA Holdings, Inc. (and its 99% owned subsidiary, American Bank, N.A.,
Dallas, Texas). Previously, Mr. Staff was an Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Advisor of Golden State Bancorp and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, California Federal Bank, FSB, from October 1994 until November 2002.
During this period he also served as a Director of California Federal Bank, FSBs
subsidiaries, First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation and Auto One Acceptance
Corporation. Mr. Staff is currently a member of the Board of Triad
Financial Corporation. Mr. Staff attended the University of Houston,
graduated from the University of Texas at Austin and was also a Certified
Public Accountant. Carl B. Webb, Director. Mr. Webb has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Webb was the President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director of San Francisco-based California
Federal Bank, the fourth largest financial institution in California, from September 1994
until the bank was purchased by a third party in November 2002. Prior to
his affiliation with California Federal Bank, Mr. Webb was the President
and CEO of First Madison Bank, FSB (1993 and 1994) and First Gibraltar Bank,
FSB (1988 to 1993), as well as President and Director of First National Bank at
Lubbock (1983 to 1988). Currently, Mr. Webb sits on the Board of Directors
of Plum Creek Timber Company and is also a member of the Board of Directors of
Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Webb received a Bachelor of Business
Administration degree from West Texas A&M University and a Graduate Banking
Degree from Southwestern Graduate School of Banking. J. Markham Green, Director. Mr. Green has served as
a director of ARC since its initial public offering in February 2004.
Mr. Green is the Chairman of the Board of PowerOne Media LLC. From
2001 to 2003, Mr. Green served as the Chairman of the Financial
Institutions and Governments Group of JP Morgan Chase. From 1993 until
joining JP Morgan Chase, he invested in and served on the boards of eight
start-up companies. From 1973, Mr. Green served in various
capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co. before he retired as a general
partner in 1992. He was co-head of the Financial Services Industry Group
of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and served on several of the firms internal
committees. Mr. Green is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin
and earned an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University. 112 9.2 %
Lawrence E. Kreider, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Kreider joined ARC
in 2001 as an Executive Vice President, also serving as Chief Financial Officer
from 2001 to 2003 and from November 1, 2004 to present, as well as Chief
Information Officer since 2002 and Chief Accounting Officer since 2004. During this
time he has also served as Executive Vice President Finance. Mr. Kreider
has direct responsibility for all financial and information technology
activities of ARC and also participates in strategic planning activities. Prior
to joining ARC in 2001, Mr. Kreider was Senior Vice President of Finance
for Warnaco Group Inc. and President of Warnaco Europe. Prior thereto, Mr. Kreider
served in several senior finance positions, including Senior Vice President,
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, with Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings from 1986 to 1999. Prior thereto, he served in senior finance
positions with Zale Corporation, Johnson Matthew Jewelry Corporation and
Refinement International Company. Mr. Kreider began his career with
Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Kreider holds an masters in business
administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business and a bachelor of arts
from Yale University. Scott L. Gesell, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel. Mr. Gesell
has served as a Vice President and as the General Counsel and Secretary for ARC
since he joined ARC in 1996. Mr. Gesell directs all legal matters for ARC,
including overseeing outside counsel, acquisition activities, legal matters
related to ARCs operating businesses and other corporate related activities. Prior
to joining ARC, Mr. Gesell served as General Counsel, and then as a Senior
Vice President/Director of Legal Operations, overseeing all of the banks
day-to-day legal operations for First Gibraltar Bank/First Madison Bank/First
Nationwide Bank. While with the First Gibraltar, First Madison and First
Nationwide Bank, he was significantly involved in mergers, acquisitions and
divestitures, as well as corporate and regulatory matters. Prior thereto, he
served in various legal capacities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas
and was in private practice with the law firm of Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler,
Milsten & Price in Oklahoma City. Mr. Gesell holds a bachelor of
arts and a juris doctor from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. He is a
member of the Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas bars. The Partnership has no salaried officers or employees. All
of the Partnerships operational and management functions are performed for it
by ARCs management services
subsidiary. The Partnership paid approximately $7.5 million, $11.0 million and $5.7 million to this affiliate for
these services for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six
months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. None of the directors or
officers of ARC receives any compensation from the Partnership. The Partnership
does not pay ARC any other compensation for its services as general partner. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP AgreementDistributions, and Allocations
of Net Income and Net Loss. 113 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ARCs Vice
Chairman, Scott D. Jackson, is the sole stockholder of JJ&T, and together
with JJ&T is the 99% owner of Global Mobile. Global Mobile and JJ&T own
100% of the membership interests of Global E, which owns six manufactured home
communities with 554 total homesites located in Wyoming. One of our
subsidiaries is a party to a property management agreement with Global E
pursuant to which the subsidiary manages all of the communities owned by Global
E in consideration for a management fee equal to 3% of gross revenues. This
subsidiary also is a party to an accounting services agreement with Global E
whereby it provides accounting services for Global Mobile in exchange for a fee
of $800 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
six months ended June 30, 2005 our management services subsidiary received
$96,000, $132,000 and $197,000, respectively, pursuant to these agreements.
Neither the property management agreement nor the accounting services agreement
can be amended without ARCs consent. Mr. Jackson
has agreed that he may not terminate either the property management agreement
or the accounting services agreement for so long as he is serving as ARCs
Chairman or our Chief Executive Officer. ARC
may terminate either of these agreements upon 30 days prior written notice.
The right of first refusal granted to
ARC pursuant to his employment agreement described below would apply to the
disposition of any communities currently owned by Global E. Mr. Jackson
is subject to an employment agreement with ARC which includes a non-competition
covenant with an exception to permit him to devote time to the management and
operation of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc.
consistent with past practice. In
addition, Mr. Jacksons agreement prohibits him from directly or
indirectly acquiring any manufactured home communities and also provides ARC
with a right of first refusal, for so long as he serves as our chairman or
chief executive officer, in connection with any proposed sale by Mr. Jackson
of any or all communities he owns directly or indirectly. Pursuant to this
right, ARC may acquire such community or communities at 95% of their fair
market value. In addition, beginning April 1, 2005, ARC entered into
a written lease agreement with JJ&T for a homesite for our Cheyenne,
Wyoming city managers office for a monthly rental fee of $230. We have placed
a manufactured home we own on the homesite. In the event that the lease is
terminated or the property management agreement discussed above is terminated,
then JJ & T is obligated to buy the home from us at our cost for the
purchase and set up of the home. Lease by
Windstar Aviation Corp. Global Mobile also has an airplane hangar located at
Centennial Airport, Englewood, Colorado. Windstar Aviation Corp., a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Partnership, owns airplanes that ARC uses in connection
with our operations and leases office and airplane hangar space from Global
Mobile at Centennial Airport in Englt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">7.50 % 2025 7,245 96,600 Other
loans 1,006 0.1 % 8.67 % 2005 172 1,000 768,114 73.2 % 6.65 % 59,520 680,265 Variable Rate Debt Senior
variable rate mortgage due 2006 108,520 10.3 % 6.22 % 2006 6,750 108,520 At December 31, 2004 companies owned and controlled by
Mr. Jackson owed ARCs management subsidiary approximately $68,000 in
accounts receivable, primarily related to rental homes acquired and property
management services performed on behalf of these companies. Pursuant to the
terms of the property management agreements between these companies and our
management subsidiary, monthly fees for property management services are paid
by these companies in the month following incurrence of the fees. At June 30,
2005, these companies owed our management subsidiary approximately $4,000. 114 Directors Holding Partnership Units Two of ARCs
directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership
units in the Partnership through which each of Mr. Mercy and Mr. Green
has deferred gains associated with certain properties. Any decision by ARCs
board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy
or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy
or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In connection with any such decision, ARCs board of
directors will determine whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a
material financial interest in the transaction that is different from the
interests of stockholders generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green
has such an interest, then such director will abstain from the vote of our
board with respect to such proposed transaction. Affiliate Services to the
Partnership See
Affordable Residential Communities LP ManagementCompensation for a
discussion of affiliate services to the Partnership. 115 POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES The following is a discussion of ARCs policies with
respect to investments, financing and certain other activities. These policies
apply to all of ARCs subsidiaries, including the Partnership. The Partnership
does not have any separate policies with respect to any of these activities. These
policies with respect to these activities have been determined by ARCs board
of directors and, in general, may be amended and revised from time to time at
the discretion of ARCs board of directors without notice to or a vote of ARCs
stockholders, except that changes in certain policies with respect to conflicts
of interest must be consistent with legal requirements. Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate. ARC conducts all of its
investment activities through the Partnership and its affiliates. Our
investment objectives are to increase cash flow, maximize the value of its
communities and acquire established income-producing manufactured housing
community properties with cash flow growth potential. Additionally, we seek to
selectively expand and upgrade both our properties and any newly acquired
communities. Our business is focused primarily on manufactured housing
community properties and activities directly related thereto including our
retail home sales and leasing, consumer finance and other complementary
businesses. Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current
income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will
sell certain manufactured housing community properties. We have not established
a specific policy regarding the relative priority of the investment objectives.
For a discussion of our communities and our business and other strategic
objectives, see Business and Properties. We expect to pursue our investment objectives through the
direct ownership of properties, but may also make investments in other entities.
We focus on manufactured housing community properties in those states where we
operate and select new markets. We anticipate that newly acquired properties
will be located in the U.S. However, future investments, including the
activities described below, will not be limited to any geographic area or to a
specified percentage of our assets. We believe that opportunities exist to
acquire established manufactured housing community properties which do not
possess the risks inherent in new development. We believe that, in recent
years, the available investment returns have not justified the leasing risk
associated with new development and, thus, we do not presently intend to engage
in development of new communities. We intend to engage in such future
investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of
ARCs status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We also may participate with other entities in the
ownership of manufactured home communities through joint ventures or other
types of co-ownership. We may enter into joint ventures from time to time if we
determine that doing so would be the most effective means of raising capital,
including with respect to non-stabilized communities that we acquire. Equity
investments may be subject to existing mortgage financing and other
indebtedness or such financing or indebtedness may be incurred in connection
with acquiring investments. Any such financing or indebtedness will have
priority over our equity interest in such property. Investments are also
subject to ARCs policy not to be treated as an investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. In 2003 and 2004,
we acquired three and 132 communities,
respectively. In 2005 through June 30, we have not acquired any
communities. Investments in Real Estate Mortgages. While we emphasize equity
real estate investments in manufactured housing community properties, we may,
at the discretion of ARCs board of directors, invest in mortgages and other
interests related to manufactured housing community properties. We do not
presently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of
trust, but may do so subject to the investment restrictions applicable to REITs.
The mortgages in which we may invest may be either first mortgages or junior
mortgages, and may or may not be insured by a governmental agency. Investments
in real estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may default
under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing certain mortgages may
not be sufficient to enable it to recoup its full investment. 116 Investments in Chattel Paper. While we emphasize equity
real estate investments in manufactured home community properties, we intend to
invest in chattel paper. Our consumer finance initiative involves the purchase
of consumer installment sales contracts that are secured by chattel (manufactured
homes located in its communities). These installment sales contracts are
originated and serviced by an unaffiliated third party. Perfection of security
interests in chattel varies on a state-by-state basis, but is generally done by
reflecting the existence of a security interest on the title to a manufactured
home. Foreclosure of this interest also varies from state to state, but
generally follows the guidelines set forth in the UCC as adopted in the various
states. Securities or Interests in Entities Primarily Engaged in
Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers. Subject to the percentage of
ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification,
we may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities
of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such
entities. We may acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets
of other REITs or similar entities where such investment would be consistent
with our investment policies. In any event, we do not intend that investments
in securities will require ARC to register as an investment company under the
1940 Act, and ARC would intend to divest securities before any such
registration would be required. Other than with respect to investments in
wholly-owned subsidiaries, we have not engaged in any activities of this type
in the last three years. Investments in Non-Real Estate Ventures. We may seek to enter into
new non-real estate business ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate
business ventures. The Partnership owns businesses that currently do or may in
the future engage in more diverse and more risky ventures such as the sale of
manufactured homes, finance of manufactured home sales, inventory financing, mortgage
financing, sales of home improvement products, brokerage of manufactured homes,
third-party property management, and other non-real estate business ventures
that ARCs management and board of directors determine, using reasonable
business judgment, will benefit it. Any such activity will be conducted through
a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary. Purchase and Sale of Investments. Our policy is to acquire
assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value
appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured
housing community properties, and in 2003, 2004 and 2005 through September 30,
we sold one, 17 and 12 of our communities, respectively. In addition, we also engage
in the sale of manufactured homes through our wholly-owned taxable REIT
subsidiary, ARC Dealership, Inc., or Dealership. Dealerships manufactured
home sales consisted of no homes
sold in 2003, 1,341 homes sold
in 2004 and 1,763 homes sold in
2005 through June 30. We have not
established a specific policy regarding the percentage of assets that may be
invested in any of the foregoing types of investments. We presently intend to maintain a ratio of consolidated
total indebtedness-to-total market capitalization of 65% or less. ARCs total market capitalization is defined as the
sum of the market value of its outstanding common stock and preferred stock
(which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization
ratio), plus the aggregate value of partnership units in the Partnership not
owned by ARC, plus the book value of its total consolidated indebtedness. Since
this ratio is based, in part, upon market values of equity, it will fluctuate with
changes in the price of ARCs common stock; however, we believe that this ratio
provides an appropriate indication of leverage for a company whose assets are
primarily real estate. ARCs ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization as of
June 30, 2005 was approximately 60% (59% following the sale of the 79
communities, assuming the sale of all communities, and the sale of the notes by
the Partnership). ARCs charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or
percentage of indebtedness that it may incur. ARCs board of directors may from
time to time modify its debt policy in light of then-current economic
conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of its
properties, general conditions in the market for debt and equity securities,
fluctuations in the 117 market price of its common stock,
growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. Accordingly, ARC may
increase or decrease its ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization beyond
the limits described above. If these policies were changed, we could become
more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our
obligations and a related increase in debt service requirements that could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to ARCs stockholders and the Partnerships
limited partners. To the extent that ARCs board of directors determines to
obtain additional capital, we may issue debt or equity securities, including
additional partnership units in the Partnership, retain earnings (subject to
provisions in the Internal Revenue Code requiring distributions of income to
maintain REIT status), or pursue a combination of these methods. As long as the
Partnership is in existence, the proceeds of all equity capital raised by ARC
will be contributed to the Partnership in exchange for additional interests in
the Partnership, which will dilute the ownership interests of the existing
limited partners. In 2005, we issued $25.8 million of trust preferred
securities due 2035 to ARC. Conflicts of Interest Policies We have adopted certain policies that are designed to
eliminate or minimize certain potential conflicts of interest. In addition, ARCs
board of directors is subject to certain provisions of Maryland law, which are
also designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts. However, there can be no
assurance that these policies or provisions of law will always be successful in
eliminating the influence of such conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions
could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all
securityholders. We reserve the right to dispose of any of our properties,
based upon managements periodic review of our portfolio, if ARCs board of
directors determines that such action would be in the best interest of its
stockholders. Any decision to dispose of a property will be made by ARCs board
of directors. Two of our directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham
Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which Mr. Mercy
has deferred gains associated with all the properties ARC acquired in ARCs
reorganization, and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain
properties ARC acquired from Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., I and
Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II in ARCs reorganization. Any
decision by ARCs board of directors to dispose of one or more of these
properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have
tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In
connection with any such decision, ARCs board of directors will determine
whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a material financial interest
in the transaction that is different from the interests of stockholders
generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has such an interest,
then such director will abstain from the vote of our board with respect to such
proposed transaction. Interested Director and Officer
Transactions Pursuant to Maryland law, a
contract or other transaction between ARC and a director or between ARC and any
other corporation or other entity in which any of its directors is a director
or has a material financial interest is not void or voidable solely on the
grounds of such common directorship or interest, the presence of such director
at the meeting at which the contract or transaction is authorized, approved or
ratified or the counting of the directors vote in favor thereof, provided that: · the fact of the common directorship or interest is
disclosed or known to ARCs board of directors or a committee of its board, and
ARCs board or committee authorizes, approves or ratifies the transaction or
contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even
if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum; · the fact of the common directorship or interest is
disclosed or known to ARCs stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction
or contract is authorized, approved or ratified by a majority of the votes cast
by the stockholders entitled to vote (other than the votes of shares owned of
record or beneficially by the interested director or corporation or other
entity); or 118 · the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to ARC. Furthermore, under Delaware law (where the Partnership is
formed), ARC, as general partner, has a fiduciary duty to the partnership and,
consequently, such transactions also are subject to the duties of care and
loyalty that ARC, as general partner, owes to limited partners in the
partnership (to the extent such duties have not been eliminated pursuant to the
terms of the partnership agreement). ARC requires that all contracts and
transactions between it, the Partnership or any of our subsidiaries, on the one
hand, and any of ARCs directors or executive officers or any entity in which
such director or executive officer is a director or has a material financial
interest, on the other hand, must be approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of ARCs disinterested directors. Where appropriate in the judgment of
the disinterested directors, ARCs board of directors may obtain a fairness
opinion or engage independent counsel to represent the interests of
non-affiliated security holders, although ARCs board of directors will have no
obligation to do so. Pursuant to Maryland law, each ARC director is obligated to
offer to ARC any business opportunity (with certain limited exceptions) that
comes to him and that we reasonably could be expected to have an interest in
pursuing. Mr. Jackson owns interests in certain other properties. ARC does
not own any interest in these properties. See Certain Relationships and
Related TransactionsGlobal E Portfolio. Policies with Respect to Other
Activities We may, but do not presently intend to, make investments
other than as previously described. ARC has authority to offer shares of its
common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property and to
repurchase or otherwise reacquire shares of its common stock or other equity or
debt securities in exchange for property. Similarly, the Partnership may offer
additional partnership units, which are redeemable, in exchange for property. We
also may make loans to third parties, including joint ventures in which we may
participate. As described in Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership
Agreement, ARC expects, but is not obligated, to issue shares of ARC common
stock to holders of partnership units upon exercise of their redemption rights.
ARCs board of directors has no present intention of causing it to repurchase
any ARC common stock. ARC may issue preferred stock from time to time, in one
or more series, as authorized by its board of directors without the need for
stockholder approval. We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or the
agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and do not intend to
do so. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to be
consistent with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code to qualify as a
REIT unless, because of circumstances or changes in the Internal Revenue Code
(or the regulations promulgated thereunder), the board of directors determines
that it is no longer in ARCs best interest to continue to have us qualify as a
REIT. ARC intends to make investments in such a way that it will not be treated
as an investment company under the 1940 Act. ARCs policies with respect to
such activities may be reviewed and modified from time to time by its directors
without notice to or the vote of the stockholders. In 2004, we acquired 8,025 common partnership units for
total cash consideration of $125,000,
and in 2005 through June 30, we acquired 142,077 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $1,836,000. Generally speaking, ARC makes available to its
stockholders, and causes the Partnership to make available to its limited
partners, audited annual financial statements and annual reports and quarterly
unaudited financial statements. ARC is also subject to the information
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, pursuant to which ARC files
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information, including financial
statements with the SEC. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part, the Partnership will also become subject
to the same information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. 119 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT Except as noted below, neither ARC nor
any director or executive officer of ARC owns any of, and, as of September 30,
2005, no person or entity is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of, the Partnerships outstanding common partw Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-weight:bold;"> Revolving
credit mortgage facility due 2005 58,764 5.6 % 6.17
Owner Number Percentage 2005 3,626 58,764 Trust
preferred securities due 2035 25,780 2.5 % 6.26 % 2035 1,614 25,780 Consumer
finance facility due 2008 9,369 0.9 % 6.18 %
Eugene Mercy, Jr.(1)(2) 128,059 579 9,369 Lease
receivable facility due 2007 42,100 4.0 % 10.22 % 2007 4,303 6.95 % J.
Markham Green(1)(3) 34,871 1.89 % ARC directors and officers as a group 162,930 8.84 % (1) Except
as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address for each executive
officer is 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203. (2)42,100 Floorplan
lines of credit due 2007 35,367 3.4 % 6.59 % 2007 2,331 35,367 Other
loans 1,326 0.1 % 6.97 % 2012 188 523 281,226 26.8 % 6.86 Units
beneficially owned consist of 128,059 units. In addition, the Mercy Foundation,
of which Mr. Mercy is a trustee, owns 26,202 units. This beneficial
ownership also includes 23,182 units held by his wife, Susan Mercy, for which
he disclaims any beneficial ownership. (3) Units
beneficially owned consist of 34,871 units. 120 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP The
following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the
Partnerships partnership agreement, does not purport to be complete and is
subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and
provisions of the partnership agreement, which is incorporated herein by
reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings given to them in the partnership agreement, as applicable. As used
in this section, the terms we, us, our, the Partnership refer to the
Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term ARC refers to
Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries. General; Management of the
Partnership We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 30,
1998. ARC is our sole general partner. Pursuant to our partnership agreement,
as our sole general partner, ARC has, subject to certain protective rights of
limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility
and discretion in our management and control, including the ability to cause us
to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of
substantially all of our assets. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC may
not be removed as our general partner by our other partners, with or without
cause, without ARCs consent. Our limited partners expressly acknowledged that ARC, as
our general partner, is acting for our benefit, the limited partners and ARCs
stockholders collectively. ARC is under no obligation to give priority to the
separate interests of the limited partners or its stockholders in deciding
whether to cause us to take or decline to take any actions. Limited Liability of Limited
Partners The Delaware statute under which we have been formed
provides that limited partners are not personally liable to third parties for
the obligations of their partnership unless the limited partner is also a
general partner, causes a third party to reasonably believe that the limited
partner is a general partner in the partnership or participates in the business
and control of the partnership. Our partnership agreement also provides that
generally no limited partner has any right to participate in or exercise
control or management power over our affairs. Management Liability and
Indemnification ARC, as our general partner, and its directors and officers
are not liable to us for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not
derived resulting from errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any
act or omission, so long as ARC acted in good faith. The partnership agreement
provides for indemnification of ARC, any of its officers or directors or the
Partnership and other persons as ARC may designate from and against all losses,
claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, fines, settlements and other amounts
incurred in connection with any actions relating to our operations, as set
forth in the partnership agreement (subject to the exceptions described below
under Fiduciary Responsibilities). ARCs directors and officers have duties under applicable
Maryland law to manage us in a manner consistent with the b="Times New Roman" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-weight:bold;">% 19,391 280,423 $ 1,049,340 100.0 % 6.71 % $ 78,911 $ 121 judgment or mistakes of fact or law
or of any act or omission if ARC or its director or officer acted in good faith.
In addition, we are required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and their
respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages,
liabilities, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or
the other persons in connection with any actions relating to our operations,
provided that we will not indemnify for willful misconduct or a knowing
violation of the law or any transaction for which the person received an
improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the
partnership agreement. Our partnership agreement prohibits
ARC from entering into or conducting business other than in connection with: · the ownership, acquisition or disposition of its
partnership interests as general partner; · the management of our business; · ARCs operations as a reporting company under the Exchange
Act; · ARCs operations as a REIT; · the offering, sale, syndication, private placement or
public offering of stock, bonds, securities or other interests; · financing or refinancing of any type related to us or our
assets or activities; · any of the foregoing activities as they relate to a
subsidiary of the Partnership or of ARC; and · such activities as are incidental thereto. In addition, ARC may not own any assets or take title to
assets (other than temporarily in connection with an acquisition prior to
contributing such assets to the Partnership) other than interests in its
subsidiaries and subsidiaries of the Partnership, its general partnership
interests and such cash and cash equivalents, bank accounts or similar
instruments or accounts as ARC deems reasonably necessary, taking into account,
among other things, the requirements necessary for ARC to carry out its
responsibilities contemplated under our partnership agreement, its charter and
to qualify as a REIT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if ARC acquires assets in
its own name and owns property other than through the Partnership, the partners
have agreed to negotiate in good faith to amend the partnership agreement to reflect
such activities and the direct ownership of assets by ARC. ARC and any of its affiliates are entitled to acquire our
partnership units and to exercise all rights of a limited partner relating to
such units. Restrictions on Affiliate
Transactions ARC and its affiliates are generally prohibited from
selling or conveying any property to the Partnership except pursuant to
transactions that are determined by ARC in good faith to be fair and
reasonable. Outside Activities of Limited
Partners Subject to any agreements entered into by a limited partner
with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary (including, without limitation, any
employment agreement), any limited partner and its affiliates shall be entitled
to have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to
those relating to us, including business interests and activities that are in
direct or indirect competition with us or that are enhanced by our activities. Neither
we nor any partner shall have any rights in any business ventures of any
limited partner pursuant to our partnership agreement. No limited partner or
any other person shall have any obligation pursuant to our partnership
agreement, subject to any other agreements entered into by 122 such person with ARC, the
Partnership or a subsidiary, to offer any interest in any such business
ventures to us or any other person. Our partnership agreement provides that holders of our
partnership units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available
cash (i) first, with respect to any partnership units that are entitled to
any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of
unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective
percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any partnership
units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance
with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in
accordance with their respective percentage interests). Allocations of Net Income and Net
Loss Our net income and net loss are determined and allocated
with respect to each fiscal year as of the end of the year. Except as otherwise
provided in our partnership agreement, an allocation of a share of net income
or net loss is treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of
income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in computing net
income or net loss. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement,
net income and net loss are allocated to the holders of partnership units
holding the same class of units in accordance with their respective percentage
interests in the class at the end of each fiscal year. The partnership
agreement contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply with
certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements of Treasury
Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b) and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise
provided in the partnership agreement, for income tax purposes under the
Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, each item of income, gain,
loss and deduction is allocated among our limited partners in the same manner
as its correlative item of book income, gain, loss or deduction is allocated
pursuant to our partnership agreement. There will be no regularly scheduled meetings of limited
partners. Meetings of our partners may be called by our general partner, ARC,
and will be called upon the wri.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:35.0pt;">
960,688 As defined
by NAREIT, FFO represents income (loss) from continuing operations (computed
in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus
real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of
loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships
and joint ventures. We present FFO because we consider it an important
supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently
used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO
is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of
real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate
assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values
have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation
and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property
dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that,
when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in
occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and
interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of
Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999
and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO
utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such
other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for managements
discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt
service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be
considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in 84 accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial
performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance
with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds
available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or
make distributions. The following table calculates our
FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands): Three Months Ended After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of
partnership units, each of our limited partners and certain transferees will
have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our
partnership agreement, to require ARC to redeem all or a portion of the common
partnership units held by the party in exchange for a cash amount equal to the
value of our partnership units. On or before the close of business on the fifth
business day after ARC receives a notice of redemption, ARC may, in its sole
and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of ARCs
common stock imposed under ARCs charter and the transfer restrictions and
other limitations thereof, elect to acquire some or all of the tendered common
partnership units from the tendering party in exchange for shares of ARCs
common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of ARCs common stock for
each common partnership unit (subject to antidilution adjustments provided in
the partnership agreement). It is ARCs current intention to exercise this
right in connection with any redemption of partnership units. Each limited
partner may effect a redemption of partnership units only once in each fiscal
quarter, unless otherwise permitted by ARC, in its sole and absolute
discretion, and may not effect a redemption for less than 250 partnership
units. 123 Transferability of Partnership
Units In general, ARC may not voluntarily withdraw from the
Partnership or transfer its interest in us unless the limited partners consent
by approval of a majority in interest or immediately after a merger of ARC into
another entity and substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity,
excluding the general partnership interest held by ARC, are contributed to the
partnership as a capital contribution in exchange for partnership units. With
certain limited exceptions, the limited partners may not transfer their
interests in us, in whole or in part, without ARCs written consent, which
consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. No partnership unit that is
paired with shares of ARCs special voting stock may be transferred unless
accompanied by such shares of special voting stock and transferred as a unit. As
a result, transfer of partnership units that are paired with shares of special
voting stock also will be subject to the restrictions on transfer of special
voting stock contained in ARCs charter. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, upon the issuance of
ARC stock other than in connection with a redemption of partnership units, ARC
will generally be obligated to contribute the cash proceeds or other
consideration received from the issuance to the Partnership in exchange for, in
the case of common stock, common partnership units, or in the case of an
issuance of preferred stock, preferred partnership units with designations,
preferences and other rights, terms and provisions that are substantially the
same as the designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions of
the preferred stock. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC is our tax
matters partner. Accordingly, ARC has the authority to handle tax audits and to
make tax elections under the Internal Revenue Code on our behalf. The Partnership has perpetual
existence, unless dissolved upon: · our bankruptcy, judicial dissolution or withdrawal (unless,
in the case of a withdrawal, a majority-in-interest of the
remaining limited partners agree to continue the partnership and to the
appointment of a successor general partner); · the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all
of our assets; · redemption (or acquisition by ARC) of all partnership units
other than units held by us; or · an election by ARC in its capacity as our sole general
partner. Resale Registration Statement for
the Limited Partners of the Partnership Pursuant to the partnership agreement, ARC maintains a
registration statement registering the resale by the limited partners of the
Partnership of any of ARCs securities issued to the limited partners upon a
redemption of their partnership units. ARC will use all reasonable efforts to
keep any shelf registration statement effective until the third anniversary of
the date on which the registration statement becomes effective. ARC has the
right in its sole discretion, based on valid business purpose to suspend the
use of the prospectus comprising a part of the shelf registration statement for
a reasonable length of time and from time to time provided that the aggregate
number of days in all delay periods occurring in any period of twelve
consecutive months shall not exceed 105 days. In connection with ARCs reorganization, the limited
partners of the Partnership also were granted piggyback registration rights
in connection with certain registered offerings of ARCs securities. These
piggyback registration rights will terminate when the resale shelf registration
statement described in the preceding paragraph becomes effective under the 1933
Act. 124 Year Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2005 2004(1) 2004(1)(2) 2003(3) 2002(4) DESCRIPTION OF NOTES The
following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the
notes and the indenture, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of
the notes and the indenture, which are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to
them in the notes or the indenture, as applicable. As used in this section, the
terms we, us, our, the Partnership refer to the Partnership and not to
any of its subsidiaries. The term ARC refers to Affordable Residential
Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries. We have issued $96,600,000 million aggregate principal
amount of notes, and the notes are limited to the aggregate principal amount of
$100,000,000. We issued the notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of August 9,
2005, between us, as issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The terms of the notes include those provisions contained
in the notes and the indenture and those made part of the indenture by
reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The notes are subject
to all such terms, and holders of notes are referred to the notes, the
indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. Copies of the
indenture and the form of the notes are available for inspection at the
corporate trust office of the trustee, currently located at U.S. Bank National
Association, 60 Livingston Avenue, EP-MN-WS3C, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292;
Attention: Rick Prokosch. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 71¤2% per year from and
including August 9, 2005 or the most recent interest payment date to which
interest has been paid or provided for, and is payable semi-annually in
arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Interest will be
paid to each registered holder at the close of business on the February 1
or August 1 (whether or not a business day in New York City) immediately
preceding the applicable interest payment date, each of which we refer to as a
record date. Interest on the notes is computed on the basis of a 360-day year
consisting of twelve 30-day months. In addition, we will pay additional interest on the notes
under the circumstances described below under Registration Rights. The notes will mature on August 15, 2025 and will be
paid against presentation and surrender thereof at the corporate trust office
of the trustee unless (1) earlier redeemed by us at our option or
repurchased by us at Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Net loss from
continuing operations $ (16,351 ) $ (5,326 ) $ (30,384 ) $ (42,578 ) $ (84,913 The notes were issued only in fully registered, book-entry
form, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, except under the
limited circumstances described below under Book-Entry System. If any interest payment date, stated maturity date,
redemption date or repurchase date is not a business day in New York City, the
payment otherwise required to be made on such date will be made on the next
such business day without any additional payment as a result of such delay. All
payments will be made in U.S. dollars. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the
Partnership and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness. However, the notes are effectively subordinated to our mortgages
and 125 other secured indebtedness (to the
extent of the value of the collateral securing the same) and to all preferred
equity and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries. As
of June 30, 2005 we had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured
indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness and our
consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of
other liabilities. The indenture governing the notes does not prohibit us or
any of our affiliates or subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness or
issuing preferred equity in the future. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
OfferingThe notes are effectively subordinated to our existing and future
secured indebtedness and The notes are effectively subordinated to
liabilities of our subsidiaries. Subject to
the restrictions on ownership of ARC common stock and the conditions described
below, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption
any outstanding notes (or $1,000 portions thereof) into shares of ARC common
stock initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock
per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price
of $14.31 per ARC common share). The exchange rate and the equivalent exchange
price in effect at any given time are referred to in this prospectus as the exchange
rate and the exchange price, respectively, and will be subject to adjustment
as described herein. Holders may exchange notes only in denominations of $1,000
and whole multiples of $1,000. If we call notes for redemption, you may
exchange the notes only until the close of business on the business day
immediately preceding the redemption date unless we fail to pay the redemption
price. Upon
exchange of a note, a holder will not receive any cash payment of interest,
subject to certain exceptions, and we will not adjust the exchange rate to
account for accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of
notes at the close of business on a record date for an interest payment will
receive payment of interest payable on the corresponding interest payment date
notwithstanding the exchange of such notes at any time after the close of
business on the applicable regular record date. Notes tendered for exchange by
a holder after the close of business on any record date65pt;">
) $ (43,267 ) $ (48,109 ) Plus: < for an interest payment
and on or prior to the corresponding interest payment date must be accompanied
by payment of an amount equal to the interest that the holder is to receive on
the notes; provided, however, that no such payment will be made (1) if we
have specified a redemption date that is after such record date and on or prior
to such interest payment date or (2) with respect to overdue interest, if
any overdue interest exists at the time of exchange with respect to such notes. If a holder
exchanges notes, we will pay any documentary, stamp or similar issue or
transfer tax due on the issuance of shares of ARC common stock upon the
exchange, if any, unless the tax is due because the holder requests the shares
to be issued or delivered to a person other than the holder, in which case the
holder will pay that tax prior to receipt of such shares. A holder
wishing to exercise its exchange rights must deliver an irrevocable duly
completed exchange notice to the exchange agent. Holders may obtain copies of
the required form of the exch/p>
Depreciation and amortization 22,224 17,242 42,255 32,152 72,014 46,467 37,058 Income from discontinued operations. 72 343 1,000 795 1,915 31 1,040 Depreciation and amortization from discontinued
operations (18 ) 1,085 5 1,825 3,134 2,589 1,957 Less: Amortization of loan origination fees. In lieu of delivery of shares of ARC common stock upon all
or any portion of the exchanged notes, we may elect to pay holders surrendering
notes for exchange an amount in cash per note (or a portion of a note) equal to
the average closing price of ARC common stock over the five trading day period
starting on and including the third trading day following the exchange date
multiplied by the exchange rate in effect on the exchange date (or portion of
the exchange rate applicable to a portion of a note if a combination of 126 ARC common stock and cash is to be
delivered). We will inform such holders through the trustee no later than two
business days following the exchange date of our election to deliver shares of
ARC common stock, to pay cash in lieu of delivery of the shares or to deliver a
combination of ARC common stock and cash. If we elect to deliver solely shares
of ARC common stock, these will be delivered through the exchange agent no
later than the third business day following the exchange date. If we elect to
deliver a combination of shares of ARC common stock and cash or to pay all of
such payment in cash, such delivery and payment will be made to holders
surrendering notes no later than the tenth business day following the
applicable exchange date. The closing price of ARC common stock on any trading day
means the reported last sale price per share (or, if no last sale price is
reported, the average of the bid and ask prices per share or, if more than one
in either case, the average of the average bid and the average ask prices per
share) on such date reported by the New York Stock Exchange or, if ARC common
stock is not quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported by the
principal national securities exchange or quotation system on which ARC common
stock is then listed or otherwise as provided in the indenture. If a holder has already delivered a repurchase notice as
described under either Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates or Repurchase
at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change, with respect to a note, that
holder may not tender that note for exchange until the holder has properly
withdrawn the repurchase notice. Upon surrender of a note for exchange, the holder shall
deliver to us cash equal to the amount that we are required to deduct and
withhold under applicable law in connection with such exchange; provided, however, that if the holder does
not deliver such cash, we may deduct and withhold from the consideration
otherwise deliverable to such holder the amount required to be deducted and
withheld under applicable law. Holders may surrender their notes for exchange of shares of
ARC common stock at the applicable exchange rate at any time prior to the close
of business on the second business day immediately preceding the stated
maturity date. The initial exchange rate will be adjusted for certain
events, including: (1) the issuance of ARC common
stock as a dividend or distribution on ARC common stock;
(1,911 ) (855 ) (3,772 ) (1,722 ) (5,952 ) (3,213 ) (4,129 ) Depreciation expense on furniture, equipment and
vehicles (529 ) (81 ) (951 ) (449 ) (1,264 ) (1,112 (3) the issuance to all holders
of ARC common stock of rights or warrants entitling them to purchase ARC common
stock (or securities exchangeable into ARC common stock) at less than (or
having an exchange price per share less than) the current market price of ARC
common stock; (4) the dividend or other
distribution to all holders of ARC common stock or shares of ARC capital stock
(other than common stock) of evidences of indebtedness or assets, including
securities, but excluding (A) the rights and warrants referred to above, (B) dividends
and distributions in connection with a reclassification, change, consolidation,
merger, combination, sale or conveyance resulting in a change in the exchange
consideration pursuant to the second succeeding paragraph or (C) dividends
or distributions paid exclusively in cash; (5) dividends or other
distributions consisting exclusively of cash to all holders of ARC common stock
in excess of $0.1875 per share in each fiscal quarter (the dividend threshold
amount); the dividend threshold amount is subject to adjustment as a result of
the same events giving rise to an adjustment to the exchange rate, provided
that no adjustment will be made to the dividend threshold amount as a result of
any event described in this clause (5); and 127 (6) payments to holders of ARC
common stock in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer for ARC common
stock by ARC or any of its subsidiaries to the extent that the cash and fair
market value of any other consideration included in the payment per share
exceeds the closing price of ARC common stock on the trading day following the
last date on which tenders or exchanges may be made pursuant to such tender
offer or exchange offer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an
adjustment to the exchange rate pursuant to clauses (5) or (6) above,
in no event will the exchange rate exceed 82.1018 shares of ARC common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment pursuant to
clauses (1) through (4) above. No adjustment in the exchange rate will be required unless
such adjustment would require a change of at least one percent in the exchange
rate then in effect at such time. Any adjustment that would otherwise be
required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any
subsequent adjustment. Except as stated above, the exchange rate will not be
adjusted for the issuance of ARC common stock or any securities exchangeable
into or exchangeable for ARC common stock or carrying the right to purchase any
of the foregoing. We will not make any adjustment if holders of notes are entitled
to participate in the transactions described above. In the case of: · any reclassification or change of ARC common stock (other
than changes resulting from a subdivision or combination); or · a consolidation, merger or combination involving ARC or a
sale or conveyance to another corporation of all or substantially all of ARCs
property and assets, in each case as a result of which
holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive stock, other securities,
other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) with
respect to or in exchange for ARC common stock, holders of notes will be
entitled thereafter to exchange their notes into the kind and amount of shares
of stock, other securities or other property or assets (including cash or any
combination thereof) which they would have owned or been entitled to receive
upon such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or
conveyance had such notes been exchanged into ARC common stock immediately
prior to such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination,
sale or conveyance. In the event holders of ARC common stock have the
opportunity to elect the form of consideration to be received in a
reclassification, change, consolidation, merger combination, sale or
conveyance, we will make adequate provision whereby the holders of the notes
shall have the opportunity, on a timely basis, to determine the form of
consideration into which all of the notes, treated as a single class, shall be
exchangeable. Such determination shall be based on the blended, weighted
average of elections made by holders of the notes who participate in such
determination and shall be subject to any limitations to which all of the
holders of ARC common stock are subject to, such as pro-rata reductions
applicable to any portion of the consideration payable. We may not become a
party to any such transaction unless its terms are consistent with the
foregoing. If a taxable distribution to holders of ARC common stock or
other transaction occurs which results in any adjustment of the exchange price,
the holders of notes may, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received
a distribution subject to U.S. income tax as a dividend. In certain other
circumstances, the absence of an adjustment may result in a taxable dividend to
the holders of common stock. See Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations. We may make such reductions in the exchange price, in addition
to those set forth above, as the board of directors deems advisable to avoid or
diminish any income tax to holders of ARC common stock resulting from any
dividend or distribution of stock (or rights to acquire stock) or from any
event treated as such for income tax purposes. We may from time to time, to the extent permitted by law,
reduce the exchange price of the notes by any amount for any period of at least
20 days. In that case we will give at least 15 days notice of such
decrease. 128 Determination
of Make Whole Premium If a
transaction described in the first, second or fourth bullet of the definition
of change in control (as set forth under Repurchase at Option of Holders upon
a Fundamental Change) occurs prior to August 20, 2015 and a holder elects
to exchange its notes in connection with such transaction, we will increase the
applicable exchange rate for the notes surrendered for exchange by a number of
additional ARC common shares (the additional change in control shares), as
described below. An exchange of notes will be deemed for these purposes to be in
connection with such a change in control transaction if the notice of exchange
of the notes is received by the exchange agent from and including the date that
is 15 business days prior to the anticipated effective date of the change in
control up to and including the business day prior to the repurchase date as
described under Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change. The number
of additional change in control shares will be determined by reference to the
table below and is based on the date on which such change in control
transaction becomes effective (the effective date) and the price (the stock
price) paid per ARC common share in such transaction. If the holders of ARC
common shares receive only cash in the change in control transaction, the stock
price shall be the cash amount paid per ARC common share. Otherwise, the stock
price shall be the average of the closing sale prices of ARC common shares on
the ten consecutive trading days up to but excluding the effective date. The stock
prices set forth in the first row of the table (i.e., the column headers) will be adjusted as of any date on
which the exchange rate of the notes is adjusted. The adjusted stock prices
will equal the stock prices applicable immediately prior to such adjustment
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the exchange rate
immediately prior to the adjustment giving rise to the stock price adjustment
and ) (1,019 ) FFO 3,487 12,408 8,153 (9,977 ) (15,066 ) 1,495 (13,202 ) Less preferred unit distributions. (2,971 ) (2,578 ) (5,942 ) (3,810 ) (9,752 ) FFO available to common partnership
unitholders $ 516 $ 9,830 $ 2,211 $ (13,787 ) $ (24,818 ) $ 1,495 $ (13,202 ) (1) Our
FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes $27.9 million of costs
related to ARCs IPO, financing transactions and the Hometown acquisition. (2) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes charges for the following: (i) retail
losses of $11.2 million related to sales of older vacant homes sold during
the fourth quarter at discounts to their original costs and marketing and
promotion costs both incurred to drive occupancy, help establish and drive our
Hispanic marketing initiative and reduce future repairs and maintenance costs
in our rental home portfolio; (ii) $3.0 million of impairment charges
related to older vacant rental homes we expect to sell in 2005 at prices less
than their carrying value in order to continue to drive occupancy in specific
markets and reduce repairs and maintenance costs in our rental home portfolio; (iii) $0.9 million
of goodwill impairment related to our insurance business; (iv) $1.0 million
of severance costs related to the fourth quarter resignation of our chief
operating officer and the second quarter resignation of other executive
officers; (v) approximately $500,000 of impairment charges related to
three communities; and (vi) approximately $500,000 related to property
damage sustained during the hurricanes that occurred in the third quarter in
the Southeast United States. (3) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2003 includes a charge of
$1.4 million for retail home sales asset impairment and other expense and
a charge of approximately $864,000 for the cost of vacating unused office space
and $337,000 in executive severance. (4) FFO
for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes charges incurred in the
reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt including
$1.9 million for exit fees and $1.6 million for the write off of unamortized
loan costs, and includes a charge of $13.6 million to write off goodwill
associated with our retail home sales and insurance businesses. For more
details see our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31,
the denominator of which is the exchange rate as so adjusted. In addition,
the number of additional change in control shares will be subject to adjustment
in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under Exchange
Rate Adjustments. The following table sets forth the
stock price and number of additional change in control shares of ARC common
stock to be received per $1,000 principal amount of notes: Stock Price Effective Date Date 8/9/2005 8/20/2006 8/20/2007 8/20/2008 8/20/2009 8/20/2010 8/20/2011 8/20/2012 8/20/2013 8/20/2014 8/20/2015 $12.18 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 85 Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Our future
income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are
dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk
of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We use some
derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks
related to our borrowings. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative
purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based
on their credit rating and other factors. As of June 30,
2005, our pro forma debt outstanding was $1,049.3 million, comprised of $768.1
million of indebtedness subject to fixed interest rates and $281.2 million, or 26.8%,
of our total consolidated debt, subject to variable interest rates. In February 2004
we entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement pursuant to which we
effectively fixed the base rate portion of the interest rate with respect to $100 million
of our variable rate debt. As a result, approximately 80% of our total
indebtedness is subject to fixed interest rates for a minimum of two years. If LIBOR
and the prime rate were to increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense
on the variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by
approximately $3.2 million annually. If, after consideration of the
interest rate swap agreement described above, LIBOR and the prime rate were to
increase by 1.00%, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt
would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately
$2.2 million annually. Interest
risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest
rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect
of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment.
Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to
further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of
the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these
analyses assume no changes in our financial structure. The fair
value of pro forma debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $1,076.4
million. 86 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP The
Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership whose sole general partner is ARC.
As of June 30, 2005, ARC owned approximately 94.8% of the Partnerships
outstanding partnership interests. ARC is a fully integrated, self-administered
and self-managed Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust, or REIT. We acquire,
renovate, reposition and operate primarily all-age manufactured home
communities. We also lease with the option to purchase, rent and sell
manufactured homes, finance sales of manufactured homes and act as agent in the
sale of homeowners insurance and other related insurance products, all
exclusively to residents and prospective residents in our communities. As of June 30,
2005, we owned and operated 315 manufactured home communities (excluding one
community held for sale) in 27 states containing 62,942 homesites. These
properties are located in 67 markets across the United States. Our five largest
markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 11.5% of our total homesites;
Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with
6.0% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our
total homesites; and Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of
our total homesites. On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors
authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all
these communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237
communities that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating
strategy objectives. After taking into account the proposed sale of
these communities, on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five
largest markets are Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total
homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City,
Utah, with 7.6% of our total homesites; the Front Range of Colorado, with 6.6%
of our total homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total
homesites. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro
Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data for a
further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of
these sales and the sale of the notes. ARCs
predecessor was formed in 1995. In the first quarter of 2004, ARC completed its
initial public offering, or IPO, of 25,300,209 shares of ARC common stock
(including 2,258,617 shares sold by selling securityholders) and 5,000,000
shares of ARCs 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. In
conjunction with the IPO, we also completed a financing transaction involving
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser
of the notes, consisting of $500 million of new mortgage debt and the
repayment of some of our existing indebtedness. We used a portion of the
proceeds from ARCs IPO and the financing transaction to acquire
90 manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C., or
Hometown. See Note 3 to the Partnerships annual audited financial statements
included in this prospectus for a further discussion of the Hometown
acquisition. Our principal executive, corporate and property management
offices are located at 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, Colorado
80203, and our telephone number is (303) 383-7500. Our internet address is
www.aboutarc.com. The information
contained on our website is not part of this prospectus. Our
principal business objectives are to achieve sustainable long-term growth in
cash flow>
12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 Community Renovation and Repositioning. We utilize a comprehensive
four-stage process that we call B-F-F-R to renovate and reposition the
communities we acquire and improve their operating 87 performance. B-F-F-R stands for: Buyacquisition, Fixphysical
infrastructure and resident quality, Filloccupancy level, Runongoing,
long-term operations. Our prior acquisitions generally have targeted
communities that demonstrate opportunities for improvement in operating results
due to one or more of the following characteristics: · below market rate leases; · high operating expenses; · poor infrastructure and
quality of residents; 12.2206 0.0000 13.00 10.2161 9.8807"2" face="Symbol" style="font-size:10.0pt;">· inadequate capitalization;
or · a lack of professional
management. While community acquisition opportunities have historically
been a significant focus of our activities, we are currently less focused on
such opportunities and more focused on community operations. With respect to the other stages of the B-F-F-R process, we
have established district and regional management that has a sufficiently
limited span of control to allow for strong focus on community development. We
have also established a mobile management team positioned to address specific
issues related to particular markets and drive new programs. We focus on our
communities utilizing B-F-F-R according to their relative occupancy levels as
follows: · For communities above 90%
occupancy, we primarily focus on improving operating margins through expense
and overhead management, utility recovery and creation of additional revenue
sources (as of June 30, 2005, 131 communities with 23,222 homesites
averaging 96% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the
proposed sale of 79 communities with 20,246 homesites averaging 95.5% occupancy); · For communities between 80%
and 90% occupancy, we focus on sales and leasing activities, resident retention
and delivering the necessary homes to the community to allow for occupancy
growth (as of June 30, 2005, 96 communities with 20,331 homesites
averaging 86% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the
proposed sale of 79 communities, 77 communities with 17,262 homesites averaging
85.9% occupancy); and · For communities below 80%
occupancy, we focus on developing community management and sales staff, making
capital expenditures, supplying necessary homes to provide for occupancy growth
and establishing resident standards with respect to behavior and rent payment (as
of June 30, 2005, 47 communities with 10,057 homesites between 70%
and 80% occupancy averaging 76% occupancy and another 41 communities with 9,332
homesites below 70% occupancy averaging 63% occupancy, or, on a pro forma basis,
after giving effect to the proposed sale of 79 communities, 28 communities with
6,825 homesites between 70% and 80% averaging 76% occupancy and another 21
communities with 5,135 homesites below 70% averaging 64.3% occupancy). Significant Presenfont> 9.5000 9.1194 88 turnaround time on construction, renovation, repairs and
home installation services. We believe the significant size and geographic
diversity of our portfolio reduces our exposure to risks associated with
geographic concentration, including the risk of economic downturns or natural
disasters in any one market in which we operate. Broad Based Marketing Efforts. We have developed and
implemented a number of marketing initiatives to enhance the visibility of our
communities, maintain and improve our occupancy, and identify, reward and
lengthen the lease duration of our good customers. We have active marketing and
sales teams at both the corporate and local market level. Our home lease with
option to purchase program allows residents who might not otherwise qualify for
home ownership through traditional purchase or financing avenues the
opportunity to work towards home ownership while they lease. Our ability to
provide financing to our residents and prospective residents is supported by
our consumer finance facility. We have also established a Hispanic marketing
initiative targeted at addressing the specific needs and cultural preferences
of the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. Proactive Management to Maximize
Occupancy. In response to challenging industry conditions,
particularly the shortage of available consumer financing for the purchase of
manufactured housing, we have developed and implemented a range of programs
aimed primarily at increasing and maintaining our occupancy, improving resident
satisfaction and retention, increasing revenue and improving our operating
margins. We focus on converting long-term renters into homeowners and improving
occupancy through the sale of older homes for casottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">
8.6301 7.9468 7.4436 7.0419 7.0419 7.0419 0.0000 14.00 8.3749 8.0136 Customer Satisfaction and Quality
Control. Our
goal is to meet the needs of our residents or prospective residents for housing
alternatives in a clean and attractive environment at affordable prices. We
have established a nationwide call center with bilingual staff to manage
resident communications and enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We
approach our business with a consumer product focus having an emphasis on value
and quality for our residents and prospective residents. We have quality
assurance programs executed through employee training and adherence to
guidelines developed by our senior management, based in part upon surveys of
our customers. Our customer focus and quality controls are designed to provide
consistency and quality of product and to enable our community managers to
effectively market our communities and improve occupancy and resident retention
across our portfolio. Community Acquisitions/Dispositions. Over the last ten years, ARC
has acquired over 340 communities with over 70,000 homesites. We have invested
in dedicated resources, including acquisition, due diligence, construction and
marketing teams which allowed us to significantly broaden our acquisition
prospects, incorporating stabilized and non-stabilized communities. We have
compiled a proprietary computer database containing detailed information on
over 28,000 manufactured home communities located throughout the United States,
which enables us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities quickly, often
before the community has been marketed publicly. However, while community
acquisition opportunities have historically been a significant focus of our
activities, we are currently less focused on such opportunities and more
focused on community operation. In addition, we also sold more than 30
communities, and have announced plans to sell up to an additional 79 communities,
when it became evident that these communities did not fit our market or
performance objectives. We continue to evaluate our property portfolio and may sell
additional properties in the future. Home Rental Program. Our real estate segment
revenue consists of homeowner rental income, home renter rental income and
utility and other income. We receive homeowner rental income from homeowners
who lease homesites in our communities, and we receive home renter rental
income from persons who rent manufactured homes and homesites from us in our
communities pursuant to our home rental program and our home lease with option
to purchase program. For the six months ended June 30, 89 2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, home
renter rental income totaled $22.9 million, or approximately 20% of our
total real estate revenue, and $40.3 million, or approximately 20% of our
total real estate revenue, respectively, and homeowner rental income totaled
$78.7 million, or approximately 70% of our total real estate revenue, and
$145 million, or approximately 71% of our total real estate revenue,
respectively. At June 30, 2005, we owned a total of 8,718 homes in our
communities with acquisition and improvement costs of $249.2 million,
which are rented, available for rent or for sale. These homes had an occupancy
rate of approximately 86% at June 30, 2005. We intend to continue to
expand our home rental program in the future. Home Lease with Option to Purchase. Our home lease with option
to purchase program is a program that we initiated in 2004 to address the
demand for home ownership in that segment of the population that
7.6469 7.2499 6.7830 6.2169 5.5323 4.6956 3.7746 2.7440 0.0000 15.00 6.9156 6.4409 The
manufactured housing industry represents a meaningful portion of the U.S.
housing market. In 2000, there were an estimated 22 million people living
in manufactured homes in the United States. The manufactured housing industry
is primarily focused on providing affordable housing to moderate-income
customers. A manufactured home is a single-family house constructed
entirely in a factory rather than at a homesite, with generally the same
materials found in site-built homes and in conformity with federal
construction and safety standards. Each
homeowner in a manufactured home community leases a homesite from the owner of
the community. The manufactured home community owner owns the underlying land,
utility connections, streets, lighting, driveways, common area amenities and
other capital improvements and is responsible for enforcement of community
guidelines that govern resident conduct and maintenance of the community. Generally,
each homeowner is responsible for the maintenance of their home and upkeep of
their leased site. We believe that manufactured home communities have several
characteristics that make them an attractive investment when compared to some
other types of real estate, particularly multi-family real estate,
including the following: · significant barriers to the
entry of new manufactured home communities into the market; · large and growing
demographic group of potential customers; 90 · comparatively stable
resident base; · fragmented ownership of
communities; · comparatively low recurring
capital requirements; · improved economies of scale
in operation of multiple sites; and · 7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.0pt;">
6.0190 5.6616 5.2984 4.9353 4.4068 3.6785 2.7276 1.4954 0.0000 16.00 5.9083 5.2726 affordable homeowner
lifestyle. The
manufactured housing industry faces a challenging operating environment, which
has resulted in losses, exits from the industry and significant curtailment of
activity among manufacturers, retailers and consumer finance companies.
According to Manufactured Housing Institute, or MHI, industry shipments (a
measure of manufacturers home production and wholesale sales) have declined
from 372,843 homes in 1998 to 130,802 in 2004. We believe this dramatic decline
in production and sales is largely the result of an oversupply of consumer
credit from 1994 to 1999, which led to over stimulation in the manufacturing,
retail and finance sectors of the industry. Current industry conditions are
further exacerbated by low mortgage interest rates and less stringent credit
requirements for the purchase of entry-level site built homes, thereby
reducing the price competitiveness of manufactured housing. We expect industry conditions to remain difficult for the
foreseeable future, based partly on overall economic conditions throughout the
United States and a continued shortage of available consumer financing for
manufactured home buyers. We anticipate that demand for manufactured housing
and manufactured home communities will improve if home mortgage interest rates
return to higher historical levels, which should reduce the pricing
differential between home mortgage interest rates and interest rates for
financing the purchase of a manufactured home. On September 21,
2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARCs board of
directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARCs board of
directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director James F.
Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC. Mr. Scott
D. Jackson, ARCs former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had assumed the
position of Vice Chairman of ARCs board of directors and would direct ARCs
sales of communities. On that
date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625
dividend on ARCs Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a
distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnerships Series C preferred
partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on October 30,
2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARCs board of directors
also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARCs common stock and the quarterly
distribution on the Partnerships common partnership units, in each case, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Also on
September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors authorized the sale of
approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming all
79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities
that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy
objectives. In September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage
facility to extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended,
the facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at
September 30, 2005). See Description of Other IndebtednessRevolving Credit
Mortgage Facility Due 2006 for a further discussion of this amendment. In October
2005, we amended our lease receivables facility to increase the size of the faclity
from $75 million to $150 million. The amendment also (i) increased the
limit on borrowings under the lease receivables facility from an amount equal
to approximately 55% of the net book value of the eligible 91 manufactured housing units owned by two of our indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries, ARC Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP (collectively,
Housing) and located in ARCs communities, to 65%, subject to certain other
applicable borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on
borrowings under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus
one-month LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the
maturity of the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008.
See Description of Other IndebtednessLease Receivables Facility Due 2008 for
a further discussion of this amendment. Our Markets The table below provides summary
information on our portfolio as of June 30, 2005 for our 20 largest
markets: 4.6812 4.1705
Market(1) Number Percentage Occupancy Rental Income 3.7891 3.3968 3.0046 2.6123 2.2201 Dallas/Fadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">
1.2536 0.0000 17.00 5.2941 4.5418 3.7839 3.0444 2.3763 2.0309 1.9261 1.6038 1.2814 0.9591 0.0000 18.00 5.0000 4.1667 3.2881 2.4091 1.4853 0.4825 0.4647 0.4137 0.3656 0.2372 0.0000 20.00
7,223 11.5 % 4.5000 3.7500 2.8500 2.0000 1.0000 % $ 349 Atlanta, GA 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 25.00 3.6000 3.0000 2.2800 1.6000 0.8000 0.0000 0.0000 4,969 7.9 % 89.2 % 349 Salt Lake City, UT 3,792 6.0 % 92.1 % 348 Front Range of CO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30.00
3,287 5.2 % 89.1 % 3.0000 2.5000 1.9000 1.3333 0.6667 429 Kansas City-Lawrence-Topeka, MO-KS 2,428 3.9 %
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.00 89.6 % 285 Jacksonville, FL
2.2500 1.8750 1.4250 1.0000 0.5000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,256 3.6 0.0000 50.00 % 88.2 % 349 Wichita, KS 2,178 3.5 % 66.7 % 273 Orlando, FL 1,986 1.8000 1.5000 1.1400 0.8000 0.4000 0.0000
3.2 % 89.8 % 368 St. Louis, MO-IL 1,912 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 129 The exact stock prices and effective dates may not be set
forth in the table, in which case: (1) if the stock price is between two stock price amounts in
the table or the effective date is between two dates in the table, the
additional change in control shares will be determined by straight-line
interpolation between the number of additional change in control shares set
forth for the higher and lower stock price amounts and the two dates, as
applicable, based on a 365-day year; (2) if the stock price is in excess of $50.00 per ARC common
share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be
issued upon exchange; and (3) if the stock price is less than $12.18 per ARC common share
(subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued
upon exchange. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in no event will the total number of ARC common shares issuable
upon exchange exceed 82.1018 per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to
adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under Exchange
Rate Adjustments. Our obligation to deliver the additional change in control
shares could be considered a penalty, in which case the enforceability thereof
would be subject to general principles of reasonableness of economic remedies. Provisional Redemption of the Notes
at Our Option We will not
have the right to redeem any notes prior to August 20, 2010. Beginning
on August 20, 2010, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part for cash
at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on
the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of the common stock has
exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any
consecutive 30-day trading period. The exchange
price as of any day will equal $1,000 divided by the exchange rate. If we
redeem the notes, we will make an additional payment equal to the total value
of the aggregate amount of the interest otherwise payable on the notes from the
last day through which interest was paid on the notes through the date of
redemption. We must make these payments on all notes called for redemption,
including notes exchanged after the date we mailed the notice. We will
give at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, notice of
redemption by mail to holders of notes. Notes or portions of notes called for
redemption will be exchangeable by the holder until the close of business on
the business day prior to the redemption date. If we do not redeem all of the notes, the trustee will
select the notes to be redeemed in principal amount of $1,000 or integral
multiples thereof, by lot or on a pro rata basis. If any notes are to be
redeemed in part only, we will issue a new note or notes with a principal
amount equal to the unredeemed principal portion thereof. If a portion of your
notes is selected for partial redemption and you exchange a portion of your
notes, the exchanged portion will be deemed to be taken from the portion
selected for redemption. Repurchase at Option of Holders on
Certain Dates Holders of
notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part (in
principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) on August 15,
2010, August 15, 2015 and August&e-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 3.0 % 81.0 % 290 Oklahoma City, OK 1,887 3.0 % 78.5 % 130 Holders
must deliver a written repurchase notice to the paying agent, which initially
is the trustee, during the period beginning at any time from the opening of
business on the date that is 20 days prior to the repurchase date until
the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. Our
repurchase obligation will be subject to certain additional conditions. On or before the 20th day prior to each repurchase date, we
will provide to the trustee, any paying agent and to all holders of the notes,
and to beneficial owners as required by applicable law, a notice stating, among
other things: · the amount of the repurchase
price; and · the procedures that holders
must follow to require us to repurchase their notes. We will
also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
or Bloomberg Business News containing the information specified in such notice
or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York
City or on ARCs website, or through such other public medium as we deem
appropriate at that time. A holders notice electing to require us to repurchase
notes must specify: · that such notice complies
with appropriate procedures of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC; · the portion of the principal
amount of notes to be repurchased, which must be $1,000 or an integral multiple
of $1,000; and · that the notes are to be
repurchased by us pursuant to the applicable provisions of the notes. Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice in whole or in
part by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to
the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. The
notice of withdrawal must specify: · the principal amount of
notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn; · that the withdrawal notice
complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in
book-entry form; and · the principal amount of
notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice. Holders electing
to require us to repurchase notes must either effect book-entry transfer of
notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures or
deliver the notes in certificated form, together with necessary endorsements,
to the paying agent prior to the repurchase date to receive payment of the
repurchase price on the repurchase date. We will pay the repurchase price
within two business days after any such transfer or delivery on or after the
repurchase date. If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the
repurchase price of the notes on the business date following the repurchase
date, then immediately after the repurchase date: · such notes will cease to be
outstanding; · interest on such notes will
cease to accrue; and · all rights of holders of
such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price. In connection with any repurchase offer, we will, if
required, comply with the provisions of Rule 13e-4, Rule 14e-1,
and any other tender offer rules under the Exchange Act which may then be
applicable; and file a Schedule TO or any other required schedule under
the Exchange Act. 131 Repurchase at Option of Holders
upon a Fundamental Change If a
fundamental change occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may
require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100%
of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus unpaid interest, if
any, accrued to the repurchase date. Within
20 days after the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are obligated to
give to the holders of the notes notice of the fundamental change and of the
repurchase right arising as a result of the fundamental change and the
repurchase date (which may be no earlier than 15 days and no later than
30 days after the date of such notice). We must also deliver a copy of
this notice to the trustee. We will also disseminate a press release through
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News announcing
the occurrence of the fundamental change or publish that information in a
newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARCs website, or
through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time. To exercise
its repurchase right, a holder of notes must deliver written notice of such
holders exercise of its repurchase right to the trustee prior to the close of
business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice by a written
notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of
business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. If a holder of
notes delivers a repurchase notice, it may not thereafter surrender such notes
for exchange unless such repurchase notice is withdrawn as permitted below. The
notice of withdrawal must specify: · the principal amount of
notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn; · that the withdrawal notice
complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in
book-entry form; and · the principal amount of
notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice. Holders
electing to require us to repurchase notes must effect book-entry transfer of
notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures. We
will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer
on or after the repurchase date. If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the
repurchase price of the notes on the repurchase date, then on and after such
date: · such notes will cease to be
outstanding; · interest on such notes will
cease to accrue; and · all rights of holders of
such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price. A fundamental
change will be deemed to occur upon a change in control or a termination of
trading. A change in control will be deemed to have occurred at
such time after the original issuance of the notes when the following has
occurred: · any person or group (as
such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act)
acquires the beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a purchase,
merger or other acquisition transaction, of 50% or more of the total voting
power of the total outstanding voting stock of ARC other than an acquisition by
ARC, us, any of its or our subsidiaries or any of its or our employee benefit
plans; 132 · we or ARC consolidates with,
or merges with or into, another person or conveys, transfers, leases or
otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets to any person, or
any person consolidates with or merges with or into ARC or us, other than: · 289 Greensboro-Winston Salem, NC 1,398 2.2 % 69.5 % 270 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 1,385 2.2 % 86.8 % 265 Inland Empire, CA 1,223 1.9 % 95.1 % 397 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 1,212 any transaction (A) that
does not result in any reclassification, exchange, or cancellation of
outstanding shares of ARCs capital stock or our partnership units, as the case
may be, and (B) pursuant to which holders of ARCs capital stock or our
partnership units, as applicable, immediately prior to the transaction have the
entitlement to exercise, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total
voting power of all shares of ARC capital stock entitled to vote generally in
the election of directors of the continuing or surviving person immediately
after the transaction or 50% of the voting power of our partnership units as
the case may be; · any merger solely for the
purpose of changing ARCs or our jurisdiction of formation and resulting in a
reclassification, exchange or exchange of outstanding shares of common stock
solely into shares of common stock of the surviving entity; · during any consecutive
two-year period, individuals who at the beginning of that two-year period
constituted the board of directors of ARC (together with any new directors
whose election to such board of directors, or whose nomination for election by
stockholders, was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still
in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any
reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of ARC then in
office; or · we or ARC approve a plan of
liquidation or dissolution. Beneficial
ownership will be determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3
promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The term person includes any
syndicate or group that would be deemed to be a person under Section 13(d)(3) of
the Exchange Act. A termination
of trading is deemed to occur if ARC common stock (or other common stock into
which the notes are then exchangeable) is neither listed for trading on a U.S.
national securities exchange nor approved for trading on an established
automated over-the-counter trading market in the United States. The
definition of fundamental change includes a phrase relating to the conveyance,
transfer, lease, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
assets of the ARC or us. There is no precise established definition of the
phrase substantially all under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a
holder of notes to require us to repurchase such notes as a result of a
conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of less than all of the
assets of the ARC or us may be uncertain. Rule 13e-4
under the Exchange Act requires the dissemination of information to
securityholders if an issuer tender offer occurs and may apply if the
repurchase option becomes available to holders of the notes. We will comply
with this rule to the extent applicable at that time. We will
comply with the provisions of any tender offer rules under the Exchange
Act that may then be applicable, and will file any schedule required under the
Exchange Act in connection with any offer by us to purchase notes at the option
of the holders of notes upon a fundamental change. In some circumstances, the
fundamental change purchase feature of the notes may make more difficult or
discourage a takeover of us and thus the removal of incumbent management. The
fundamental change purchase feature, however, is not the result of managements
knowledge of any specific effort to accumulate shares of common stock or to
obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, solicitation or
otherwise, or part of a plan by management to adopt a series of anti-takeover
provisions. Instead, the fundamental change purchase feature is the result of
negotiations between us and the initial purchasers of the notes. 133 We may, to
the extent permitted by applicable law, at any time purchase the notes in the
open market or by tender at any price or by private agreement. Any note
purchased by us (a) after the date that is two years from the latest
issuance of the notes may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be
reissued or sold or may be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation or (b) on
or prior to the date referred to in (a), will be surrendered to the trustee for
cancellation. Any notes surrendered to the trustee may not be reissued or
resold and will be canceled promptly. The
foregoing provisions would not necessarily protect holders of the notes if
highly leveraged or other transactions involving us occur that may adversely
affect holders. Our ability to repurchase notes upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change is subject to important limitations. The occurrence of a
fundamental change could cause an event of default under, or be prohibited or
limited by, the terms of indebtedness that we may incur in the future. Further,
we cannot assure you that we would have the financial resources, or would be
able to arrange financing, to pay the repurchase price for all the notes that
might be delivered by holders of notes seeking to exercise the repurchase right.
Any failure by us to repurchase the notes when required following a fundamental
change would result in an event of default under the indenture. Any such
default may, in turn, cause a default under indebtedness that we may incur in
the future. No notes may be purchased by us at the option of holders
upon the occurrence of a fundamental change if there has occurred and is
continuing an event of default with respect to the notes, other than a default
in the payment of the fundamental change purchase price with respect to the
notes. 1.9 % 85.6 % 326 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 1,179 1.9 % 81.8 % 251 Southeast FL 1,125 1.8 % 96.0 % No Stockholder Rights for Holders
of Notes Holders of notes, as such, will not have any rights as
stockholders of ARC (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to
receive any dividends or other distributions on shares of ARC common stock),
except in limited circumstances described above under Exchange RightsExchange
Right Adjustments. In order to assist ARC in maintaining its qualification as
a REIT for federal income tax purposes, ownership by any person of more than
7.3% of outstanding ARC common stock is restricted, unless waived or modified
by ARCs board of directors. See Description of ARC Capital Stock and Our
Partnership UnitsARCs Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer. Calculations
in Respect of the Notes Except as explicitly specified otherwise herein, we will be
responsible for making all calculations required under the notes. These
calculations include, but are not limited to, determinations of the exchange
price and exchange rate applicable to the notes. We will make all these
calculations in good faith and, absent manifest error, our calculations will be
final and binding on holders of the notes. We will provide a schedule of our
calculations to the trustee, and the trustee is entitled to rely upon the
accuracy of our calculations without independent verification. The trustee will
forward our calculations to any holder of notes upon the request. The Partnership may consolidate with, or sell, lease or convey
all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or into, any other
entity, provided that the following conditions are met: · we shall be the continuing
entity, or the successor entity (if other than the Partnership) formed by or
resulting from any consolidation or merger or which shall have received the
transfer of assets 134 shall expressly assume payment of the principal of and
interest on all of the notes and the due and punctual performance and
observance of all of the covenants and conditions in the indenture; · if as a result of such
transaction the notes become convertible or exchangeable into common stock or
other securities issued by a third party, such third party fully and
unconditionally guarantees all obligations under the notes and the indenture; · immediately after giving
effect to the transaction, no Event of Default under the indenture, and no
event which, after notice or the lapse of time, or both, would become an Event
of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing; and · an officers certificate and legal opinion covering these
conditions shall be delivered to the trustee. The following are events of default under the indenture: · default in the payment of
any principal amount or any redemption price, purchase price, or fundamental
change purchase price due with respect to the notes, when the same becomes due
and payable; · default in payment of any
interest (including liquidated damages) under the notes, which default
continues for 30 days; · default in the delivery when
due of shares of ARC common stock or any cash in lieu of such shares payable
upon exchange with respect to the notes, including any make whole premium,
which default continues for 15 days; · our failure to comply with
any of our other agreements in the notes or the indenture upon our receipt of
notice of such default from the trustee or from holders of not less than 25% in
aggregate principal amount of the notes, and the failure to cure (or obtain a
waiver of) such default within 30 days after receipt of such notice; · default in the payment of
principal when due or resulting in acceleration of other indebtedness of us or
any significant subsidiary for borrowed money where the aggregate principal
amount with respect to which the default or acceleration has occurred exceeds
$5 million and such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled or
such indebtedness repaid within a period of 30 days after written notice
to us by the trustee or to us and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in
aggregate principal amount of the notes, provided that if any such default is
cured, waived, rescinded or annulled, then the event of default by reason
thereof would be deemed not to have occurred; and · certain events of
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization affecting us. If an event of default shall have happened and be
continuing, either the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the notes then outstanding may declare the principal of the
notes and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration
immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or
insolvency, the principal amount of the notes together with any accrued
interest through the occurrence of such event shall automatically become and be
immediately due and payable. 135 The trustee and we may amend the indenture or the notes
with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the notes then outstanding. However, the consent of the
holder of each outstanding note affected is required to: · alter the manner of
calculation or rate of accrual of interest on the note or change the time of
payment; · make the note payable in
money or securities other than that stated in the note; · change the stated maturity
of the note; · reduce the principal amount,
redemption price, purchase price or fundamental change purchase price
(including any make-whole premium payable) with respect to the note; · make any change that
adversely affects the rights of a holder to exchange the note in any material
respect; · make any change that
adversely affects the right to require us to purchase the note in any material
respect; · impair the right to
institute suit for the enforcement of any payment with respect to the note or
with respect to exchange of the note; or · change the provisions in the
indenture that relate to modifying or amending the indenture. Without the consent of any holder of notes, the trustee and
we may amend the indenture: · to evidence a successor to
us and the assumption by that successor of our obligations under the indenture
and the notes; · to add to our covenants for
the benefit of the holders of the notes or to surrender any right or power
conferred upon us; · to secure our obligations in
respect of the notes; · to evidence and provide the
acceptance of the appointment of a successor trustee under the indenture; 495 Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 1,094 1.7 % 85.7 % 340 Nashville, TN 1,071 1.7 % 72.8 % 291 Sioux City, IA-NE 994 1.6 % 79.8 % 290 Syracuse, NY · to cure any ambiguity,
omission, defect or inconsistency in the indenture; or · to make any change that does
not adversely affect the rights of the holders of the notes in any material
respect. The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of
the outstanding notes may, on behalf of all the holders of all notes: · amend, alter or change the
terms and provisions of the agreement described below under · waive compliance by us with
restrictive provisions of the indenture, as detailed in the indenture; or · waive any past default under the indenture and its
consequences, except a default in the payment of any amount due, or in the
obligation to deliver common stock, with respect to any note or in respect of
any provision which under the indenture cannot be modified or amended without
the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected. 136 If at any time we or ARC are not subject to the reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, we will promptly furnish to the holders,
beneficial owners and prospective purchasers of the notes or underlying shares
of ARC common stock, upon their request, the information required to be delivered
pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933 to
facilitate the resale of those notes or shares pursuant to Rule 144A. We will regularly furnish to the trustee copies of ARCs
annual report to its stockholders, containing audited financial statements, and
any other financial reports which ARC furnishes to its stockholders. We may satisfy and discharge our obligations under the
indenture by delivering to the trustee for cancellation all outstanding notes
or by depositing with the trustee, the paying agent or the exchange agent, if
applicable, after the notes have become due and payable, whether at stated
maturity or any redemption date, or any purchase date, or a fundamental change
purchase date, or upon exchange or otherwise, cash or shares of common stock
(as applicable under the terms of the indenture) sufficient to pay all of the
outstanding notes and paying all other sums payable under the indenture. If money deposited with the trustee or paying agent for the
payment of principal of, premium, if any, or accrued and unpaid interest or
additional interest on, the notes remains unclaimed for two years, the trustee
and paying agent will pay the money back to us upon our written request. However,
the trustee and paying agent have the right to withhold paying the money back
to us until they publish in a newspaper of general circulation in New York
City, or mail to each holder, a notice stating that the money will be paid back
to us if unclaimed after a date no less than 30 days from the publication
or mailing. After the trustee or paying agent pays the money back to us,
holders of notes entitled to the money must look to us for payment as general
creditors, subject to appign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
931 1.5 % 64.7 % 340 Subtotal: Top 20 Markets 43,530 69.2 % 84.5 % 339 All Other Markets 19,412 The indenture and the notes are governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the law of the State of New York. U.S. Bank
National Association is the trustee, registrar, exchange agent and paying
agent. If an Event
of Default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be required to use the
degree of care and skill of a prudent man in the conduct of his own affairs. The
truing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.2pt;">
30.8 % 84.4 % 297 Total
Homesites/Weighted Average Occupancy 62,942 100.0 % 84.5 % $ 326 (1) Markets
are defined by our management. (2) Rental
income is defined as homeowner lot rental income, home renter lot and home
rental income and other rental income reduced by move-in bonuses and rent
concessions. Rental income does not include utility and other income. After taking into account
the proposed sale of the 79 communities announced on September 21, 2005,
on a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2005, our five largest markets are
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, with 13.1% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia,
with 10.0% of our total homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 7.6% of our total
homesites; and Jacksonville, Florida, with 4.5% of our total homesites. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical and Pro
Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data for a
further discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of
these sales and the sale of the notes. 92 As of June 30, 2005, our portfolio consisted of 315
manufactured home communities (net of one community classified as discontinued
operations) comprising approximately 62,942 homesites located in 27 states
and 67 markets, primarily oriented toward all-age living. If the trustee becomes one of our creditors, it will be
subject to limitations on its rights to obtain payment of claims or to realize
on some property received for any such claim, as security or otherwise. The
trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions with us. If, however, it
acquires any conflicting interest, it must eliminate that conflict or resign. 137 In connection with the issuance of the notes, we and ARC
entered into an agreement by which we acknowledge our responsibility as sole
obligor of the notes. The agreement provides that if we are obligated to
deliver shares of ARC common stock pursuant to the indenture, ARC will issue
the required number of shares and deliver them to the exchanging noteholder. At
such time, we will issue to ARC an equal number of common partnership units. Under
the agreement, ARC has agreed not to consolidate with or merge into another
business entity or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets,
unless: · either (1) ARC is the
continuing entity in the case of a merger or consolidation or (2) the
resulting, surviving or acquiring entity, if other than ARC, is a U.S. entity
and it expressly assumes ARCs obligations under the agreement and the
indenture; · immediately after giving
effect to the transaction, no event of default under the indenture and no
circumstances which, after notice or lapse of time or both, would become an
event of default under the indenture, shall have happened and be continuing;
and · ARC has delivered to the
trustee an officers certificate and a legal opinion confirming that ARC has
complied with the indenture. No provision of the agreement may be amended, modified, or
waived without the consent of a majority in principal amount of notes then
outstanding, except that the unanimous consent of the holders of all
outstanding notes is required in order to amend, modify, or waive the
provisions the agreement that may adversely affect the right of holders of
notes to exchange their notes for ARC common stock as provided in the
indenture. We have
issued the notes in the form of one or more global securities. The global
security has been deposited with the trustee as custodian for DTC and
registered in the name of a nominee of DTC. Except as set forth below, the
global security may be transferred, in whole and not in part, only to DTC or
another nominee of DTC. A holder of the notes will hold its beneficial
interests in the global security directly through DTC if it has an account with
DTC or indirectly through organizations that have accounts with DTC. Notes in
definitive certificated form (called certificated securities) will be issued
only in certain limited circumstances described below. DTC has advised us that it is: · a limited purpose trust
company organized under the laws of the State of New York; · a member of the Federal
Reserve System; · a clearing corporation
within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and · a clearing agency
registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was
created to hold securities of institutions that have accounts with DTC (called
participants) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions among its participants in such securities through electronic
book-entry changes in accounts of the participants, thereby eliminating the
need for physical movement of securities certificates. DTCs participants
include securities brokers and dealers, which may include the initial
purchasers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Access to DTCs book-entry system is also available to others
such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (called, the indirect
participants) that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a
participant, whether directly or indirectly. 138 We expect
that pursuant to procedures established by DTC upon the deposit of the global
security with DTC, DTC will credit, on its book-entry registration and transfer
system, the principal amount of notes represented by such global security to
the accounts of participants. The accounts to be credited shall be designated
by the initial purchasers. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global
security will be limited to participants or persons that may hold interests
through participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security
will be shown on, and the transfer of those beneficial interests will be
effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to participants
interests), the participants and the indirect participants. The laws of
some jurisdictions may require that certain purchasers of securities take
physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. These limits and laws
may impair the ability to transfer or pledge beneficial interests in the global
security. Owners of
beneficial interests in global securities who desire to exchange their
interests for common stock should contact their brokers or other participants
or indirect participants through whom they hold such beneficial interests to
obtain information on procedures, including proper forms and cut-off times, for
submitting requests for exchange. So long as DTC, or its nominee, is the
registered owner or holder of a global security, DTC or its nominee, as the
case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes
represented by the global security for all purposes under the indenture and the
notes. In addition, no owner of a beneficial interest in a global security will
be able to transfer that interest except in accordance with the applicable
procedures of DTC. Except as
set forth below, an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security, will
not be entitled to have the notes represented by the global security registered
in its name, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of
certificated securities and will not be considered to be the owner or holder of
any notes under the global security. We understand that under existing industry
practice, if an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security desires
to take any action that DTC, as the holder of the global security, is entitled
to take, DTC would authorize the participants to take such action. Additionally,
in such case, the participants would authorize beneficial owners owning through
such participants to take such action or would otherwise act upon the
instructions of beneficial owners owning through them. We will
make payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest (including any
liquidated damages) on the notes represented by the global security registered
in the name of and held by DTC or its nominee to DTC or its nominee, as the
case may be, as the registered owner and holder of the global security. Neither
we, the trustee nor any paying agent will have any responsibility or liability
for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of
beneficial interests in the global security or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests. As of June 30, 2005, our communities had an occupancy
rate of 84.5% and the average
monthly rental income per occupied homesite was $326. Leases for homeowners are
generally month-to-month, or in limited cases year-to-year, and require
security deposits. In the case of our residents renting homes from us, lease
terms are typically one year, and require a security deposit. Under our lease
with option to purchase program, residents enter into a long term lease, typically
24 to 84 months, pay a security deposit and option fee and commit to monthly
payments creditable to their down payment upon purchase of the home. We commit
to the price of the home upon purchase at the end of the lease. 93 The following table sets forth
certain information regarding our communities, including the 79 communities we
have identified as held for sale, arranged from our largest to smallest market,
as of June 30, 2005. Rental income includes homeowner rental income and
home renter rental income reduced by move in bonuses and rent concessions. Rental Income Transfers
between participants in DTC will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance
with DTC rules and will be settled in same-day funds. 139 DTC has advised us that it will take any action permitted
to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction of one or more
participants to whose account the DTC interests in the global security is credited
and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of notes
as to which such participant or participants has or have given such direction. However,
if DTC notifies us that it is unwilling to be a depositary for the global
security or ceases to be a clearing agency or there is an event of default
under the notes, DTC will exchange the global security for certificated
securities which it will distribute to its participants and which will be
legended, if required, as set forth under Transfer Restrictions. Although DTC
is expected to follow the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers
of interests in the global security among participants of DTC, it is under no
obligation to perform or continue to perform such procedures, and such
procedures may be discontinued at any time. Neither we nor the trustee will
have any responsibility, or liability for the performance by DTC or the
participants or indirect participants of their respective obligations under the
rules and procedures governing their respective operations. We and ARC
have agreed, at our expense, to file with the SEC the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part. We and ARC have agreed to use our respective
best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective as
promptly as is practicable, but in no event later than 180 days aftpt;">
Occupancy If, · on the 180th day
following the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes, the shelf
registration statement has not been declared effective; · the registration statement
shall cease to be effective or fail to be usable without being succeeded within
five business days by a post-effective amendment or a report filed with the SEC
pursuant to the Exchange Act that cures the failure of the registration
statement to be effective or usable; or 140 · on the 30th day of any period that the
prospectus has been suspended as described in the preceding paragraph, such
suspension has not been terminated, (each, a registration default), additional interest as
liquidated damages will accrue on the notes, from and including the day
following the registration default to but excluding the day on which the
registration default has been cured. Liquidated damages will be paid semi-annually in arrears,
with the first semi-annual payment due on the first interest payment date, as
applicable, following the date on which such liquidated damages begin to accrue,
and will accrue at a rate per year equal to:
Per Occupied Number of June 30, 0pt;">· an additional
0.25 percent of the principal amount to and including the 90th
day following such registration default; and · an additional
0.50 percent of the principal amount from and after the 91st
day following such registration default. In no event
will liquidated damages accrue at a rate per year exceeding 0.50 percent. If
a holder has exchanged some or all of its notes into common stock, the holder
will not be entitled to receive liquidated damages with respect to the
principal amount of the notes exchanged. We have
distributed a questionnaire to each holder to obtain information regarding the
holder for inclusion in the prospectus. Holders are required to complete and
deliver the questionnaire within 20 business days after receipt of the
questionnaire to be named as selling stockholders in this prospectus at the
time of effectiveness. A holder will not be entitled to liquidated damages
unless it has provided all information requested by the questionnaire prior to
the deadline. The
specific provisions relating to the registration described above are contained
in the registration rights agreement that was entered into on the closing of
the initial offering of the notes. This summary of the registration rights
agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
registration rights agreement. 141 DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS At June 30, 2005, the
Partnership had $1,089.0 million of outstanding indebtedness. $767.2 million,
or 70%, of our total indebtedness was fixed rate and $321.8 million, or
30%, was variable rate. The following table sets forth information with respect
to the Partnerships total indebtedness at June 30, 2005, adjusted to give
effect to the original offering of the notes to the initial purchaser and the
use of proceeds therefrom. On a pro forma basis, the Partnership had $1,049.3 million
of outstanding indebtedness, $768.1 million, or 73%, of our indebtedness
was fixed rate and $281.2 million, or 27%, was variable rate. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical
and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data
for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of the proposed
sale of up to 79 communities announced September 21, 2005 and the
sale of the notes. Amount Average Average (dollars in (in years) Long-term debt:Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 2005 Per Month Dallas/Ft.
Worth, Texas
Meadow Glen TX Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2009 $ 83,067
409 64.8 % $ 289 Brookside Village 5.05 % 4 TX 394 79.7 % 300 Southfork TX 323 92.9 %
Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2012 276,278 7.35 % 7 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2014 189,522 5.53 % Creekside TX
9 Various
individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031 121,641 7.20 % 9 Senior
variable rate mortgage due 2006(1) 308 86.7 % 311 108,520 6.22 % 1 Village North TX 289 90.7 % 393 Summit Oaks TX 278 Revolving
credit mortgage facility due 2006 58,764 6.17 % Trust
preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC) 25,780 83.1 % 361 Chalet City
6.26 % 30 Senior
Exchangeable Notes due 2025 96,600 7.50 % 20 Consumer
finance facility due 2008 9,369 TX 6.18 % 3 Lease
receivable facility due 2007 42,100 10.22 % 2 Floorplan
line of credit due 2007 35,367 6.59 % 2 Other
loans 2,332 7.70 % 3
257 79.8 % 331 Twin Parks TX 247 76.1 % 438 Lakewood * TX 224 82.1 Total debt $ 1,049,340 6.71 % (1) The
senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month
periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009
with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection
with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an
obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by
29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed
rate mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will
amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1,
2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established
reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance,
capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating
expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The senior fixed rate
mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment
penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005,
$98.9 million was outstanding ($83.1 million on a pro forma basis) under
the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009. 142 Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 on May 2,
2002. It is an obligation of some of our special purpose real property
subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The
senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per
annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and matures
on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have
established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate
taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The
senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based
prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30,
2005, $302.3 million was outstanding ($276.3 million on a pro forma
basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 on February 18,
2004 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, in connection with the completion of ARCs
IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain of our real
property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities
owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 bears
interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year
schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the
mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged
properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property
operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 contains customary
defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to
maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $211.9 million was outstanding ($189.5 million
on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014. Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages
Due 2005 Through 2031 We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in
connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at
the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to
refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by
specific manufactured home communities and subject to early pre-payment
penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are
as follows: (a) Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part
of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately
$46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and
have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%. (b) Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the
Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30,
2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual
interest rate of 7.06%. (c) Notes assumed
in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately
$29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average
effective annual interest rate of 7.18%. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2006 We entered into the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006
with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection
with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown Communities acquisition. It
is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized
by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior
variable rate mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a 143 spread of 3.00% over the one-month
LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At
our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the senior variable
rate mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In
connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay
extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance,
respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in
the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to
purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee
equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal
amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount
equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by
the lenders to refinance the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Pursuant
to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating
to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending
and property operating expenditures. We may repay the senior variable rate
mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of
0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being
repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in
months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. As of June 30,
2005, $140.5 million was outstanding ($108.5 million on a pro forma
basis) under the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due
2006 In September 2004, we obtained a revolving credit
mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is
an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and is secured by 33 communities that
previously secured our prior senior revolving credit facility, as well as
various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARCs IPO. Advances under
the revolving credit mortgage facility are limited by borrowing base
requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing
the loan. As amended in September 2005, the revolving credit mortgage
facility bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term
through September, 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of
the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay
an advance fee to the extent any advance takes the amount of indebtedness
outstanding under the facility above $58.764 million. The facility contains no
significant financial covenants. As of June 30, 2005, $58.8 million
was outstanding under the revolving credit mortgage facility. Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035
(Due to ARC) On March 15, 2005, we issued $25.8 million in unsecured
trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred
securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30,
2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and
December of each year. We may redeem these securities on or after March 30,
2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued
interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if
not redeemed sooner. 424 Quail Run We entered
into the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility due in 2006 with
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial
purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs
IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in
connection with entering into a two-year secured revolving lease receivables
credit facility (see Lease Receivables Facility below). The consumer finance
facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term
of four years. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries, and
borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional
sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified
borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the
facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of
3.00% over the one-month LIBOR 144 (6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes
customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible
net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all
financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the
original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will
pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the
closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions,
including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the
conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan
term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or
15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not
exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract. The availability of advances under the consumer finance
facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions
that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a
downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets
for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding
under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value
of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the
required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The
lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide
additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the
75% loan-to-value ratio. As of June 30, 2005, $9.4 million was
outstanding under the consumer finance facility. Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008 On April 6,
2005, we obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit
facility, or the lease receivables facility, with Merrill Lynch Mortgage
Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, to be
used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate
purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to
$150 million effective October 14,
2005. This
facility is an obligation of two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, ARC
Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP, or, collectively, Housing. Borrowings under
the lease receivables facility are secured by an assignment of all lease
receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a
pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in
Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the
lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net
book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and
located in ARCs communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable
borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings
under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month
LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of
the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The fee charged by the
lender in connection with the amendment was 0.5%, or $750,000. The ability to
access funding under the amended facility is conditioned upon the satisfaction
of certain conditions precedent set forth in the amendment. Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real
Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to
the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate
has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional
collateral for the facility. Floorplan
Line Of Credit Due 2007 In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of
credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by
manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender
will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first
$40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in
advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due
145 upon sale or lease of the related
manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest
ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging
6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been
outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes
beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required
curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the homes original
invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the
homes purchase. The amended line of credit requires us to maintain a minimum
tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth
ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million,
all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial
covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit
is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per
annum and an early termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination
date. As of June 30, 2005, $43.9 million was outstanding ($35.4 million
on a pro forma basis) on the floorplan line of credit. DESCRIPTION OF ARC CAPITAL STOCK AND PARTNERSHIP UNITS The following is a summary of the
material terms of the capital stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
and the partnership units of the Partnership. Copies of ARCs charter and its
Amended and Restated Bylaws are filed as exhibits to ARCs annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005. A copy
of the Partnerships Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part. See Where You Can Find More
Information. ARCs charter provides that it may issue up to 100,000,000
shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 41,027,689 shares have
been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005; 10,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 5,750,000 shares have
been classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock,
or Series A preferred stock, of which 5,000,000 shares are issued and
outstanding as of October 21, 2005; and 5,252,876 shares of special voting
stock, par value $.01 per share, of which 3,527,896 shares have been issued and
are outstanding as of October 21, 2005. Under Maryland law, ARCs
stockholders generally are not liable for ARCs debts or obligations. All shares of ARC common stock outstanding are duly
authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of ARC common stock are
entitled to receive dividends when authorized by ARCs board of directors out
of assets legally available for the payment of dividends and declared by ARC. They
are also entitled to share ratably in ARCs assets legally available for
distribution to ARCs stockholders in the event of ARCs liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, after payment of or adequate provision for all of
ARCs known debts and liabilities. These rights are subject to the preferential
rights of any other class or series of ARCs stock and to the provisions of ARCs
charter regarding restrictions on transfer of ARCs stock. Subject to
ARCs charter restrictions on transfer of ARCs stock, each outstanding share
of ARC common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to
a vote of ARC stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as
provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, including the
special voting stock described below, the holders of ARC common stock will
possess the exclusive voting power of ARC. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of directors. Holders of
ARC common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund,
redemption or appraisal rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for
any of ARCs securities. Subject to ARCs charter restrictions on transfer of
stock, all shares of common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and
other rights. 146 Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its
assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside
the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of holders
of shares entitled to cast at least two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast
on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for
approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority
of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Except for the amendment
of the provisions of ARCs charter relating to the removal of directors and
amendment of the charter, ARCs charter provides for approval of these matters
by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast. Maryland law permits a
corporation to transfer="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.75pt;">
TX 224 78.6 % 364 Willow Terrace During 2004
ARC granted to some of its executive officers 95,000 shares of restricted
common stock that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these
restricted shares were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500
shares of restricted common stock were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their
issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 3,000 of these shares
vested. In April 2005, the ARC
board of directors d;text-align:right;"> TX 214 65.4 % 409 Arlington Lakeside TX 218 88.1 % All
shares, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote
unless forfeited. ARC considers the number of vested shares issued under its
2003 equity incentive plan as common stock outstanding and includes them in the
denominator of its calculation of basic earnings per share. ARC also considers
the total number of restricted shares granted under our 2003 equity incentive
plan in the denominator of our calculation of diluted earnings per share if
they are dilutive. ARC returns shares forfeited to the 2003 equity incentive
plan as shares eligible for future grant and adjusts any compensation expense
previously recorded on such shares in the period the forfeiture occurs. We and ARC
have entered into a pairing agreement pursuant to which each of our 1,830,961 partnership
units issued in connection with ARCs 2002 reorganization was issued as part of
a paired unit that includes 1.9268 shares of ARC special voting stock. Each of
the paired units is currently exchangeable by its holder for cash, or, at ARCs
election, one share of ARC common stock, and each paired unit entitles its
holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARCs stockholders who
have voting rights generally. Collectively, our limited partners who hold these
paired units and ARC common stock have approximately 5.2% of the total voting
power of ARC common stock at June 30, 2005. A holder of special voting
stock is not entitled to any regular or special dividend payments or other
distributions, including any dividends or other distributions declared or paid
with respect to shares of ARC common stock or any of ARCs other stock, and is
not entitled to receive any distributions in the event of liquidation or
dissolution. The holders of special voting stock have no class voting rights
except as specifically set forth in our charter. ARC may not issue any additional shares of special voting
stock in the future unless such shares are paired with common partnership units.
ARC does not intend to issue any additional shares of its special voting stock.
Upon any redemption of a partnership unit that is paired with a share of
special voting stock 147 in accordance with the redemption
provisions of our partnership agreement, the share of special voting stock will
be cancelled and will become reclassified as an authorized but unissued share
of special voting stock. General Under ARCs charter, ARCs board of directors is authorized
without further stockholder action to provide for the issuance of up to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, with such terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or
conditions of redemption in each case, if any, as permitted by Maryland law and
as shall be set forth in resolutions providing for the issue of preferred stock
adopted by ARCs board of directors. 8.25% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock The Articles Supplementary adopted by ARCs board of
directors creating ARCs Series A preferred stock sets forth the number
and fixes the terms, designations, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and
restrictions of a series of ARC preferred stock classified as 8.25% Series A
cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock. ARC
designated up to 5,750,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred
stock, 5,000,000 shares of which were issued in connection with the IPO. ARCs Series A
preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol ARC Pr A.
ARCs Series A preferred stock has the following terms: · a liquidation preference of
$25.00 per share; · ranks senior to ARC common
stock with respect to dividends and liquidation; · subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior stock, is entitled to
receive, when and as authorized by ARCs board of directors and declared by
ARC, out of funds legally available for payment thereof, cumulative cash
dividends at the rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference
(equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.0625 per share); · source of funds for
dividends on ARCs Series A preferred stock is distributions paid on the
Partnerships Series A preferred units; · not redeemable prior to February 18,
2009, except in certain limited circumstances relating to maintaining ARCs
ability to qualify as a REIT as described below in ARCs Restrictions on
Ownership and Transfer; · redeemable in whole or from
time to time in part, on and after February 18, 2009, by ARC, at its
option, to the extent permitted by law, at a cash redemption price equal to
$25.00 per share, plus all accumulated dividends; · does not have any voting
rights, except in limited circumstances, including where ARC has not been
current on payment of dividends for six or more quarterly periods, whether or
not consecutive; and · is not convertible into or exchangeable for any of ARCs
other property or securities. On August 9, 2000, ARC issued 1,250,000 warrants, each
giving its holder the right to purchase one share of ARC common stock at an
exercise price of $11.70 per share. On January 23, 2004, in preparation
for the IPO, ARC effected a 0.519-for-1 reverse split of ARC common
stock. On May 23, 2005, ARC declared a cash dividend in the amount of
$0.1875 per share of ARC common stock that was paid on 148 July 15, 2005 to holders of
record of ARC common stock at the close of business on June 30, 2005. As a
result of these events, pursuant to the terms of the warrants, effective
immediately following payment of the dividend, the exercise price per share of
ARC common stock under the outstanding warrants to purchase ARC common stock
was adjusted to $18.103 and the total number of shares of ARC common stock
issuable upon exercise of all of such warrants was adjusted to 807,877. The
warrants expire if not exercised prior to 5:00 PM, New York City time, on July 23,
2010. ARCs Restrictions on Ownership and
Transfer For ARC to
qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value
of ARCs outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by
five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include
certain entities) at any time during the last half of a taxable year, and ARCs
shares of stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at
least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a
proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because its board of directors
believes that it is essential for ARC to continue to qualify as a REIT and to
provide additional protection for its stockholders in the event of certain
transactions, ARCs board has adopted, and the stockholders have approved,
provisions of ARCs charter restricting the acquisition of shares of ARCs
stock in order to assist ARC in maintaining its REIT qualifications under
circumstances that could cause ARC to violate the foregoing requirements. Subject to
certain exceptions specified in ARCs charter, no individual may own, or be
deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 7.3% (in value or number of
shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of ARC common
stock or more than 7.3% in value of the outstanding shares of ARCs capital
stock, other than with respect to Gerald J. Ford and certain affiliated parties
for whom the aggregate limit was set by the board of directors of ARC on May 23,
2005 at 19.9%. ARCs charter further prohibits (i) any individual from
owning shares of its stock that would result in ARC being closely held under Section 856(h) of
the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause ARC to fail to qualify as a REIT, (ii) any
individual from transferring shares of its stock if the transfer would result
in its stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons and (iii) any
individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in non U.S.
persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock. Any person
who acquires or intends to acquire shares of ARCs stock that may violate any
of these restrictions, or who is the intended transferee of shares of its stock
which are transferred to a trust, as discussed below, is required to give ARC
immediate notice and provide ARC with such information as ARC may request in
order to determine the effect of the transfer on ARCs status as a REIT. ARCs board
of directors may waive the 7.3% ownership limit if evidence satisfactory to it
is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future result in ARC
being closely held within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the
fair market value of its stock or otherwise result in its failing to qualify as
a REIT. In order to be considered by the board for exemption, an individual
also must not own and must represent that it will not own, directly or
indirectly, an interest in a tenant of ARCs (or a tenant of any entity which
ARC owns or controls) that would cause ARC to own, directly or indirectly, more
than a 9.8% interest in the tenant. The individual also must agree that any violation
or attempted violation of these restrictions will result in the automatic
transfer of the shares of stock causing the violation to the trust. As a
condition of such waiver, ARCs board of directors may require a ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to it with
respect to preserving ARCs qualification as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions
on transferability and ownership will not apply if ARCs board of directors
determines that it is no longer in its best interests to attempt to qualify, or
to continue to qualify, as a REIT. If any
issuance or transfer of ARCs stock would cause the outstanding shares of its
stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such issuance or
transfer will be null and void, and the 149 intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Any
attemptyle="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 342 Mesquite Meadows TX 205 88.3 % 309 Amber Village TX 204 60.3 % 359 Highland Acres TX 197 88.3 % 382 Within
20 days of receiving notice from ARC that shares of stock have been
transferred to the trust, the trustee of such trust shall sell such shares to a
person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the 7.3% or other
applicable limitations. Upon a sale of such shares by the trustee, the interest
of the charitable beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be
paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent of the lesser
of (1) such transferees original purchase price (or the original market
value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (2) the
price received by the trustee, and, second, to the charitable beneficiary, to
the extent of any sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the
original intended transferee. In addition, shares of stock held in such trust
are purchasable by ARC until the trustee has sold the shares at a price equal
to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by the original intended
transferee (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired
by gift or devise) and the market price for the stock on the date that ARC
determines to purchase the stock. Upon such sale to ARC, the interest of the
trust in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net
proceeds to the original intended transferee. All
certificates representing shares of ARC common stock and ARCs Series A
preferred stock bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above. For
purposes of the foregoing discussion, shares of special voting stock that are
at any time held in trust as a result of the excess share provisions of ARCs
charter shall include any of our partnership units paired therewith. All persons
who own more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Internal
Revenue Code or the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder) in the
aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of ARCs stock,
excluding special voting stock, must give written notice containing the
information specified in ARCs charter within 30 days after the end of
each taxable year, which is December 31. In addition, each stockholder
shall upon demand be required to disclose to ARC in writing such information
with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as
ARCs board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the requirements
of any taxing authority or governmental agency. The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding
acquisition of control of ARC by a third party unless ARCs board of directors
determines that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in its best interests. 150 The transfer agent and registrar for ARC common stock and
ARC Series A preferred stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. Series C
Partnership Preferred Partnership Units The Partnership currently has outstanding 705,688 units of Series C
preferred partnership units, or Series C PPUs. The Partnerships Series B Eagle Ridge TX · subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are
entitled to receive quarterly cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per
annum; · subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are
entitled to a liquidation preference per Series C PPU of $25.00 per unit,
plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions; · may not be redeemed at the
Partnerships option prior to July 30, 2009; on or after such date, the
Partnership has the right to redeem the Series C PPUs, in whole or in
part, at any time or from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the
liquidation preference, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions
to and including the date of redemption; · at any time after January 1,
2007, any holder of Series C PPUs has the right to require the Partnership
to redeem all or a portion of the Series C PPUs held by such holder in
exchange for one-eighth of the redemption price in cash and the balance in a
negotiable note, bearing interest at a rate of 7% per annum; · exchangeable for ARC common
stock in some circumstances; and · no voting rights or right to consent to any matter. Common
Partnership Units The 5.2%
ownership interest in the Partnership that is not held by ARC as of June 30,
2005 represents outstand.0pt;">
188 Holders of
the Partnerships OP units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of
available cash (i) first, with respect to any OP units that are entitled
to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class
of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their
respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any OP
units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance
with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in
accordance with their respective percentage interests). 151 CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS The following discussion is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any person, for the purpose of avoiding U.S.
federal tax penalties, and was written to support the promotion or marketing of
the offering described herein. Each investor should seek advice based on such
persons particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income
tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the
notes, the qualification and taxation of ARC as a REIT, and the ownership and
disposition of ARC common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. For
purposes of this section under the heading Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations,
references to ARC mean only Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and
not its subsidiaries or other lower-tier entities, except as otherwise
indicated. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Internal Revenue Code), the regulations promulgated by the U.S.
Treasury Department, or the Treasury regulations, current administrative
interpretations and practices of the IRS (including administrative
interpretations and practices expressed in private letter rulings which are
binding on the IRS only with respect to the particular taxpayers who requested
and received those rulings) and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect
and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly
with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not
assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the
tax consequences described below. No advance ruling has been or will be sought
from the IRS regarding any matter discussed in this summary. The summary is
also based upon the assumption that the operation of ARC, and of its
subsidiaries and other lower-tier and affiliated entities, will, in each case,
be in accordance with its applicable organizational documents or partnership
agreement. This summary is for general information only, and does not purport
to discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to
a particular stockholder in light of its investment or tax circumstances or to
stockholders subject to special tax rules, such as: · U.S. expatriates; · persons who mark-to-market
the notes or common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes; · subchapter S corporations; · U.S. Holders (as defined
below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; · financial institutions; · insurance companies; · broker-dealers; · regulated investment
companies; · trusts and estates; · holders who receive the
notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, through
the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation; · persons holding the notes,
or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; · persons subject to the
alternative minimum tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; · persons holding their
interest through a partnership or similar pass-through entity; · 94.7 % 368 Denton Falls 152 and, except to the extent discussed
below: · tax-exempt organizations;
and · non-U.S. H;">
TX 186 In
addition, this summary does not discuss any non-federal, state, or local tax
considerations. This summary deals only with investors who purchase the notes
as part of the initial offering for the issue price (as discussed below), and
assumes that investors will hold their notes and ARC common stock received
pursuant to an exchange of notes as capital assets (generally, property held
for investment) under the Internal Revenue Code. Investors considering the purchase of notes should consult
their tax advisors with respect to the application of the U.S. federal income
tax laws to their particular situations as well as any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction or under any
applicable tax treaty. As used
herein, the term U.S. Holder means any beneficial owner of a note, or ARC
common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, other than an entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United
States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of
the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an
estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation
regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if (A) a court within the
United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration
of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (v) certain eligible
trusts that elect to be taxed as U.S. Persons under applicable Treasury
Regulations. As used herein, the term Non-U.S. Holder means a beneficial
owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a
note, that is not a U.S. Holder. If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial
owner of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note,
the treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the
status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A holder of
notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is
a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax
advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, holding
and disposing of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of
a note. Interest. If the issue price of a note
is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, then the note will be
treated as being issued with original issue discount, or OID, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes unless the difference between the notes issue price and
its stated redemption price at maturity is less than a statutory de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the
stated redemption price at maturity of the note times the number of complete
years from issuance to maturity). Generally, the issue price of a note is the
first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold to purchasers
other than bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in
the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. The stated
redemption price at maturity of a note is the total of all payments to be made
under the note other than qualified stated interest (generally, stated interest
that is unconditionally payable in cash or property at least annually at a
single fixed rate or at certain floating rates that properly take into account
the length of the interval between stated interest payments) and, in this case,
is expected to equal the principal amount of the note. It is
anticipated that the difference, if any, between the issue price and the stated
redemption price at maturity of the notes will be less than the statutory de minimis amount and that the notes,
therefore, will not be treated as having been issued with OID. Thus, rather
than being characterized as interest, such 153 difference should be characterized as if it were gain from
the sale of the notes and must be included in income as principal payments are
received on the notes (based on the proportion of the principal payments
received to the original principal amount of the notes). The
remaining discussion assumes that the notes have not been issued with OID equal
to or in excess of the statutory de minimis
amount. Payments of Stated Interest. Stated interest on a note
without OID generally will be included in the income of a U.S. Holder as
ordinary income at the time such interest is received or accrued, in accordance
with the U.S. Holders regular method of tax accounting. Market Discount. If a U.S. Holder purchases a
note after original issue for an amount that is less than its stated redemption
price at maturity, such U.S. Holder will be treated as having purchased such
note at a market discount, unless such market discount is less than a de minimis amount (1¤61.3 % 367 Terrell Crossing * TX 186 73.7 % 424 A U.S.
Holder may be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of the
interest paid or accrued on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase
or carry a n7pt;">
Rolling Hills TX 183 87.4 % 327 Dynamic TX 156 85.9 % 340 Cottonwood Grove TX 151 94.0 % Amortizable Bond Premium. If a U.S. Holder purchases a
debt instrument for an amount that is greater than the sum of all amounts
payable on the debt instrument after the purchase date, other than payments of
qualified stated interest, such U.S. Holder will be considered to have purchased
the debt instrument with amortizable bond premium, generally equal in amount
to such excess. However, in the case of a debt instrument that may be redeemed
prior to maturity at the option of the issuer (such as the notes), the amount
of amortizable bond premium is determined by substituting the first date on
which the debt instrument may be redeemed (the redemption date) for the
maturity date and the applicable redemption price on the redemption date for
the amount payable at maturity, if the result would maximize the U.S. Holders
yield to maturity (i.e., result
in a smaller amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to the
period before the redemption date). If the issuer does not in fact exercise its
right to redeem the debt instrument on the applicable redemption date, the debt
instrument will be treated (solely for purposes of the amortizable bond premium
rules) as having matured and then as having been reissued for the U.S. Holders
adjusted acquisition price, which is an amount equal to the U.S. Holders
basis in 154 the debt instrument (as determined under the applicable
Treasury Regulations), less the sum of (i) any amortizable bond premium
allocable to prior accrual periods and (ii) any payments previously made
on the debt instrument (other than payments of qualified stated interest). The
debt instrument deemed to have been reissued will again be subject to the
amortizable bond premium rules with respect to the remaining dates on
which the debt instrument is redeemable. A U.S. Holder
may elect to amortize bond premium on a debt instrument. Once made, the
election applies to all taxable debt instruments then owned and thereafter
acquired by the U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the taxable year to
which such election applies, and may be revoked only with the consent of the
IRS. The election, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a tax
advisor. In general, a U.S. Holder amortizes bond premium by offsetting the
qualified stated interest allocable to an accrual period with the bond premium
allocable to the accrual period, which is determined under a constant yield
method pursuant to the applicable Treasury Regulations. If the bond premium
allocable to an accrual period exceeds the qualified stated interest allocable to
such period, the excess is treated by the U.S. Holder as a bond premium
deduction. The bond premium deduction for each accrual period is limited to the
amount by which the U.S. Holders total interest inclusions on the debt
instrument in prior accrual periods exceed the total amount treated by such
U.S. Holder as a bond premium deduction on the debt instrument in prior accrual
periods. Any amounts not deductible in an accrual period may be carried forward
to the next accrual period and treated as bond premium allocable to that
period. Election to Include All Interest in
Income Using a Constant Yield Method. All U.S. Holders may
generally, upon election, include in income all interest (including stated
interest, acquisition discount, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market
discount, de minimis market
discount, and unstated interest, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or
acquisition premium) that accrues on a debt instrument by using the constant
yield method applicable to original issue discount, subject to certain
limitations and exceptions. Because this election will affect how the U.S.
Holder treats debt instruments other than the notes, it should be made only in
consultation with a tax advisor. Disposition of the Notes. Upon the sale, exchange
(including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), redemption,
repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note, a U.S. Holder generally
will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the
amount of cash proceeds and the fair market value of any property (including
ARC common stock) received on the disposition (except to the extent such amount
is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which is taxable as
ordinary income if not previously included in such holders income) and (ii) such
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holders adjusted tax
basis in a note generally will equal the cost of the note to such Holder (i) increased
by any accrued market discount if the U.S. Holder has included the accrued
market discount in income and (ii) decreased by (A) the amount of any
payments, other than qualified stated interest payments, received, and (B) amortizable
bond premium taken, with respect to such note. Capital gain or loss recognized
upon the disposition of a note will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the
note was held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital
gains to non-corporate U.S. Holders is generally 15% (for taxable years through
December 31, 2008). The deductibility of capital losses may be subject to
limitations. Upon the
exchange of a note for cash and ARC common stock, if any, a U.S. Holder will
have a tax basis in any ARC common stock received equal to the fair market
value of such ARC common stock at the time of the exchange. The U.S. Holders
holding period for any ARC common stock received upon an exchange of notes will
begin on the date immediately following the date of such exchange. Adjustments to Exchange Rate. The exchange rate is subject
to adjustment under specified circumstances. Although it is not clear how or to
what extent Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable
Treasury regulations would apply to the notes because the notes are issued by
The Partnership, rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS would seek to
apply Section 305 to the notes. If 155 Section 305 were applicable, a holder of notes would,
in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution of ARC
common stock if and to the extent that the exchange rate is adjusted, resulting
in ordinary income to the extent of ARCs current and accumulated earnings and
profits. Adjustments to the exchange rate made pursuant to a bona fide
reasonable adjustment formula which has the effect of preventing the dilution
of the interest of the holders of the debt instruments will generally not be
deemed to result in a constructive distribution of ARC common stock. Certain of
the possible adjustments provided in the notes (including, without limitation,
adjustments in respect of taxable dividends to ARCs stockholders) do not
qualify as being made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula. If
such adjustments are made, we intend to take the position that you will be
deemed to have received constructive distributions from ARC, even though you
have not received any cash or property as a result of such adjustments. The tax
consequences of the receipt of a distribution from ARC are described below
under Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders and Taxation of Tax-Exempt
U.S. Stockholders. Even if an adjustment to the exchange rate were not to
result in a taxable constructive distribution to a holder of notes under Section 305
because the notes are issued by The Partnership rather than ARC, it is possible
that the IRS could assert that, under principles similar to those of Section 305,
a holder should recognize taxable income, which might be considered interest
and that you should include such interest in income upon the adjustment to the
exchange rate or, alternatively, accrue such interest prior to such adjustment. The rules governing
the U.S. fele="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 428 Mesquite Ridge TX 144 86.1 % 334 Silver Leaf TX 145 89.7 % 259 Willow Springs TX 139 86.3 % 322 Aledo Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to
determine the effect of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, as
well as tax treaties, with regard to an investment in the notes. Interest. A Non-U.S. Holder holding
the notes on its own behalf generally will be exempt from U.S. federal income
and withholding taxes on payments of interest on a note so long as such
payments are not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business
in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, unless, in the case of interest
payments, such Non-U.S. Holder is a direct or indirect 10% or greater partner
(as defined in section 871(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code) in The
Partnership, a controlled foreign corporation related to The Partnership or a
bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary
course of its trade or business. In order
for a Non-U.S. Holder that is an individual or corporation (or entity treated
as such for U.S. federal income tax purposes) to qualify for the exemption from
taxation, the withholding agent (generally, the last U.S. payor or a non-U.S.
payor who is a qualified intermediary or withholding foreign partnership) must
have received a statement (generally made on IRS Form W-8BEN) from
the individual or corporation that: (i) is signed under penalties of
perjury by the beneficial owner of the note, (ii) certifies that such
owner is not a U.S. Holder and (iii) provides the beneficial owners name
and address. Certain securities clearing organizations and other entities that
are not beneficial owners, may provide a signed statement accompanied by a copy
of the beneficial owners IRS Form W-8BEN to the withholding agent. An
IRS Form W-8BEN is generally effective for the remainder of the year
of signature plus three full calendar years unless a change in circumstances
renders any information on the form incorrect. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, a W-8BEN with a U.S. taxpayer identification number will remain
effective until a change in circumstances makes any information on the form
incorrect, provided that the withholding agent reports at least annually to the
beneficial owner. The beneficial owner must inform the withholding agent within
30 days of such change and furnish a new IRS Form W-8BEN. A Non-U.S.
Holder that is not an individual or corporation (or an entity treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding the notes on its own
behalf may have substantially increased reporting requirements and should
consult its tax advisor. 156 To the
extent that interest income with respect to a note is not exempt from the
United States tax as described above, a Non-U.S. Holder may still be able to
eliminate or reduce such taxes under an applicable income tax treaty. Disposition of the Notes. Any gain realized on the
sale, redemption, exchange, repurchase, (including an exchange for cash and any
ARC common stock), retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a
Non-U.S. Holder (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued
but unpaid stated interest, which would be taxable as described under the
preceding two paragraphs) will be exempt from U.S. federal income and
withholding taxes so long as: (i) the gain is not effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S.
Holder, (ii) in the case of a foreign individual, the Non-U.S. Holder is
not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year,
and (iii) the notes do not constitute U.S. real property interests
within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or
FIRPTA. Although
the applicable rules are not entirely clear, we intend to take the
position that the notes constitute U.S. real property interests and,
accordingly, that U.S. federal withholding tax applies under FIRPTA to any
redemption, repurchase or exchange of the notes (including an exchange of a
note for cash and any ARC common stock). Therefore, we intend to withhold 10%
of any amounts payable on the redemption, or repurchase or exchange by us of a
note (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Further,
any other sale or disposition of a note may be subject to U.S. federal income
tax withholding. You are
urged to consult your tax advisor as to whether the sale, redemption,
repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S.
federal income tax under FIRPTA if (i) the ARC common stock are part of a
class of stock that is regularly traded on and established securities market
and you held notes that, on the date of their acquisition, had a fair market
value of 5 percent or less of the fair market value of the ARC common
stock, or (ii) ARC is a domestically-controlled REIT. ARC will be a
domestically-controlled REIT if at all times during a specified testing
period it is a REIT and less than 50% in value of the ARCs shares is held
directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. ARC believes that it currently is a
domestically-controlled REIT, but because its common stock is publicly
traded, there can be no assurance that it in fact is qualified or will continue
to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT. If a sale, redemption,
repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal
income tax under FIRPTA, any amounts withheld from such payments to you may be
refunded or credited against your federal income tax liability, if any, if you
file with the IRS, on a timely basis, the required IRS forms. Adjustments to Exchange Rate. The exchange rate is subject
to adjustment in certain circumstances. Any such adjustment could, in certain
circumstances, give rise to a deemed distribution or additional interest
payment to Non-U.S. Holders of the notes. See United States HoldersAdjustments
to Exchange Price above. In such case, the deemed distribution or additional
interest payment would be subject to the rules described below under Taxation
of Non-U.S. Taxable Stockholders or under Interest above. In the case
of a deemed distribution or additional interest payment, because such deemed
distributions will not give rise to any cash from which any applicable U.S.
federal withholding tax can be satisfied, the indenture provides that we may
set off any withholding tax that we are required to collect with respect to any
such deemed distribution or payment against cash payments of interest or from
cash or shares of ARC common stock otherwise deliverable to a holder upon an
exchange of notes or a redemption or repurchase of a note. Except to the extent that an applicable income tax treaty
otherwise provides, a Non-U.S. Holder whose gain or interest income with
respect to a note is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business in the United States by such Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from the
withholding tax 157 previously discussed if an
appropriate statement is furnished, will generally be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on the gain or interest income at regular U.S. federal income tax
rates, as if the holder were a U.S. person, provided that the holder files an
IRS Form W-8ECI. In addition, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign
corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30 percent
of its dividend equivalent amount within the meaning of the Internal Revenue
Code for the taxable year, subject to adjustment, unless it qualifies for a
lower rate under an applicable tax treaty. Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding In general,
information reporting requirements and back-up withholding at the applicable
rate will apply to payments on a note (including stated interest payments and
payments of the proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, repurchase,
retirement or other disposition of a note), unless the holder of the note (i) is
a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates that fact or (ii) provides a correct taxpayer identification
number, certifies as to its exemption from backup withholding and otherwise
complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Certain
penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a holder that is required to supply
information but does not do so in the proper manner. Information
reporting requirements and backup withholding generally will not apply to
payments on a note to a Non-U.S. Holder if the statement described in Non-U.S.
Holders of the Notes is duly provided by such Holder, provided that the
Withholding Agent does not have actual knowledge that the Holder is a United
States person. Information reporting requirements and backup withholding will
not apply to any payment of the proceeds of the sale of a note effected outside
the United States by a foreign office of a broker (as defined in applicable
Treasury Regulations), unless such broker (i) is a United States person, (ii) derives
50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade
or business in the United States, (iii) is a controlled foreign
corporation as to the United States or (iv) is a U.S. branch of a foreign
bank or a foreign insurance company. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale
effected outside the United States by a foreign office of any broker that is
described in (i), (ii) or (iii) of the preceding sentence will not be
subject to backup withholding, but will be subject to the information reporting
requirements unless such broker has documentary evidence in its records that
the beneficial owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and certain other conditions are met,
or the beneficial owner otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the
proceeds of any such sale to or through the United States office of a broker is
subject to information reporting and backup withholding requirements, unless
the beneficial owner of the note provides the statement described in Non-U.S.
Holders of the Notes or otherwise establishes an exemption. TX 139 97.1 % 294 Golden Triangle TX 138 97.1 % 430 Dynamic II TX ARC has
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with
its taxable year ended December 31, 1998. ARC believes that it has been
organized and has operated in a manner which allows it to qualify for taxation
as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year
ended December 31, 1998, and it intends to continue to be organized and
operate in such a manner. ARC has
received the opinion of Skadden to the effect that commencing with its taxable
year ended December 31, 1998, ARC has been organized and operated in
conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under
the Internal Revenue Code, and that its current and proposed method of
operation will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification
and taxation as a 158 REIT. It must be emphasized that the opinion of Skadden is
based on various assumptions relating to the organization and operation of ARC,
and is conditioned upon representations and covenants made by the management of
ARC and affiliated entities regarding its organization, assets, and the past,
present and future conduct of its business operations. While ARC believes that
it is qualified and operated as a REIT, and intends to continue to operate so
that it will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing
REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of
future changes in the circumstances of ARC, no assurance can be given by
Skadden or ARC that ARC will so qualify for any particular year. Skadden will
have no obligation to advise ARC or the holders of ARC common stock of any
subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed, or of any
subsequent change in the applicable law. You should be aware that opinions of
counsel are not binding on the IRS, and no assurance can be given that the IRS
will not challenge the conclusions set forth in such opinions. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on the ability
of ARC to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual operating results,
distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification
requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code, the compliance
with which will not be reviewed by Skadden. ARCs ability to qualify as a REIT
also requires that it satisfy certain asset tests, some of which depend upon
the fair market values of assets directly or indirectly owned by ARC. Such
values may not be susceptible to a precise determination. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given that the actual results of ARCs operations for any
taxable year satisfy such requirements for qualification and taxation as a
REIT. As
indicated above, qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon ARCs
ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements
imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code. The material qualification
requirements are summarized below, under Requirements for QualificationGeneral.
While ARC intends to continue to operate so that it qualifies as a REIT, no
assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge ARCs qualification as a
REIT or that it will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT
requirements in the future. See Failure to Qualify. Provided
that ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be entitled to a deduction for
dividends that it pays and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal
corporate income tax on its net income that is currently distributed to our
stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the double taxation at
the corporate and stockholder levels that results generally from investment in
a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT generally is taxed only at
the stockholder level, upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT. For tax
years through 2008, stockholders who are individual U.S. stockholders (as
defined below) are generally taxed on corporate dividends at a maximum rate of
15% (the same as long-term capital gains), thereby substantially reducing,
though not completely eliminating, the double taxation that has historically
applied to corporate dividends. With limited exceptions, however, dividends
received by individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) from ARC or from
other entities that are taxed as REITs will continue to be taxed at rates
applicable to ordinary income, which will be as high as 35% through 2010. Net
operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT
generally do not pass through to the stockholders of the REIT, subject to
special rules for certain items, such as capital gains, recognized by
REITs. 159 If ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject
to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances: · It will be taxed at regular
corporate rates on any undistributed net taxable income, including
undistributed net capital gains; · It may be subject to the alternative
minimum tax on our items of tax preference, if any; · If it has net income from
prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of
property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a
100% tax. See Prohibited Transactions, and Foreclosure Property, below; · If it elects to treat
prope 136 95.6 % 359 Shadow Mountain * TX 129 74.4 % 277 El Lago · If it fails to satisfy the
75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but
nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT because other requirements
are met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the
greater of (1) the amount by which it fails the 75% gross income test or (2) the
amount by which it fails the 95% gross income test (for its taxable year ended December 31,
2004, the amooman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> TX 122 90.2 % 348 Mesquite Green TX 121 91.7 % 293 Hampton Acres · Commencing with its taxable
year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any of the REIT
asset tests, as described below, by larger than a de minimis amount, but its failure is due to reasonable
cause and it nonetheless maintains its REIT qualification because of specified
cure provisions, it will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of
$50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income
generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to
satisfy the asset tests; · Commencing with its taxable
year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any provision of
the Internal Revenue Code that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT
(other than a gross income or asset test requirement) and the violation is due
to reasonable cause, it may retain its REIT qualification but it will be
required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure; · If it fails to distribute during
each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income
for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year
and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, or the required
distribution, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the
required distribution over the sum of (1) the amounts actually distributed
(taking into account excess distributions from prior years), plus (2) retained
amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level; · It may be required to pay
monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if it fails
to meet record-keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance
with rules relating to the composition of its stockholders, as described
below in Requirements for QualificationGeneral; 160 · A 100% excise tax may be
imposed on some items of income and expense that are directly or constructively
paid between ARC and its taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS) (as described
below) if and to the extent that the IRS successfully adjusts the reported
amounts of these items; · If it acquires appreciated
assets from a corporation that is not a REIT in a transaction in which the
adjusted tax basis of the assets in its hands is determined by reference to the
adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the non-REIT corporation, it
will be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax
rate then applicable if it subsequently recognizes gain on a disposition of any
such assets during the 10-year period following their acquisition from
the non-REIT corporation. The results described in this paragraph assume that
the non-REIT corporation will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be
subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by ARC; · It may elect to retain and
pay income tax on its net long-term capital gain. In that case, a stockholder
would include its proportionate share of ARCs undistributed long-term capital
gain (to the extent it makes a timely designation of such gain to the
stockholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax that ARC paid
on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the
tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the stockholders
basis in ARC common stock; and · It may have subsidiaries or
own interests in other lower-tier entities that are subchapter C corporations,
the earnings of which could be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax. In addition, ARC and its subsidiaries may be subject to a
variety of taxes other than U.S. federal income tax, including payroll taxes
and state, local, and foreign income, property and other taxes on assets and
operations. As further described below, any TRS in which ARC owns an interest
will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its taxable income. It
could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently
contemplated. Requirements for QualificationGeneral The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation,
trust or association: (1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors; (2) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by
transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; (3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the
special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs; (4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance
company subject to specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; (5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more
persons; TX 119 80.7 % (7) which meets other tests described below, including with
respect to the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its
distributions; and (8) that makes an election to be a REIT for the current taxable
year or has made such an election for a previous taxable year that has not been
terminated or revoked. 161 The
Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must
be met during the entire taxable year, and that condition (5) must be
met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or
during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Conditions (5) and
(6) do not need to be satisfied for the first taxable year for which an
election to become a REIT has been made. ARCs charter provides restrictions
regarding the ownership and transfer of its shares, which are intended to
assist in satisfying the share ownership requireme>
422 Sunset Village * In addition, a corporation may not qualify as a REIT unless
its taxable year is the calendar year. ARC has and will continue to have a
calendar taxable year. Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the case of a REIT that
is a partner in a partnership, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT is
deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnerships assets and to earn
its proportionate share of the partnerships gross income based on its pro rata
share of capital interest in the partnership for purposes of the asset and
gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. However, solely for
purposes of the 10% value test, described below, the determination of a REITs
interest in partnership assets will be based on the REITs proportionate
interest in any securities issued by the partnership, excluding for these
purposes, certain excluded securities as described in the Internal Revenue Code.
In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership generally are
deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, the
proportionate share of ARC of the assets and items of income of partnerships in
which it owns an equity interest is treated as its assets and items of income
for purposes of applying the REIT requirements described below. Disregarded Subsidiaries. If a REIT owns a corporate
subsidiary that is a qualified REIT subsidiary, that subsidiary is
disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities
and items of income, deduction and credit of idth:3.75pt;">
TX 110 81.8 % 325 Kimberly at Creekside 162 U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such an entity would
generally be subject to corporate income tax on its earnings. A REIT is not
treated as holding the assets of a TRS or other taxable subsidiary corporation
or as receiving any income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued
by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the REIT, and the REIT generally
recognizes as income the dividends, if any, that it receives from the
subsidiary. A TRS may be used by the parent REIT to undertake indirectly
activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing
directly or through pass-through subsidiaries or render commercially unfeasible
(for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as
nonqualifying hedging income or inventory sales). Ce;width:12.0pt;">
TX 107 89.7 % 297 Oak Park Village In order to
maintain qualification as a REIT, ARC annually must satisfy two gross income
tests. First, at least 75% of its gross income for each taxable year, excluding
gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in prohibited
transactions, must be derived from investments relating to real property or
mortgages on real property, including rents from real property, dividends
received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured
by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities),
and gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as income from certain
kinds of temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of its gross income in
each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be
derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% income
test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the
sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to
real property. Dividend Income. Dividends received (directly
or indirectly) from a REIT, to the extent of the current and accumulated
earnings and profits of the distributing REIT, will be qualifying income for
purposes of both the 95% and 75% gross income tests. Distributions received (directly
or indirectly) from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified
REIT subsidiaries will be classified as dividend income to the extent of the
current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation.
Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of
the 95% gross income test, but not under the 75% gross income test. 163 Rents from Real Property. Rents received will qualify
as rents from real property in satisfying the gross income tests described
above, only if several conditions are met, including the following. If rent
attributable to personal property leased in connection with real property is
greater than 15% of the total rent received under any particular lease, then
all of the rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as
rents from real property. The determination of whether an item of personal property
constitutes real or personal property under the REIT provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code is subject to both legal and factual considerations and is
therefore subject to different interpretations. In addition, in order for rents received to qualify as rents
from real property, the rent must not be based in whole or in part on the
income or profits of any person. However, an amount will not be excluded from
rents from real property solely by being based on a fixed percentage or
percentages of sales. Moreover, for rents received to qualify as rents from
real property, the REIT generally must not operate or manage the property or
furnish or render certain services to the tenants of such property, other than
through an independent contractor who is adequately compensated and from
which the REIT derives no income, or through a TRS. A REIT is permitted,
however, to perform services that are usually or customarily rendered in
connection with the="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:15.8pt;">
TX 94 91.5 % Rental income will qualify as rents from real property only
to the extent that the REIT does not directly or constructively own, (1) in
the case of any tenant which is a corporation, stock possessing 10% or more of
the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or
10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such
tenant, or (2) in the case of any tenant which is not a corporation, an
interest of 10% or more in the assets or net profits of such tenant. However,
rental payments from a TRS will qualify as rents from real property even if the
REIT owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of the TRS if at least 90%
of the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by the TRS is
substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for
comparable space. Interest Income. Interest income constitutes
qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% gross income test to the
extent that the obligation is secured by a mortgage on real property. If
interest income is received with respect to a mortgage loan that is secured by
both real property and other property and the highest principal amount of the
loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the
real property on the date that the mortgage loan is acquired or originated, the
interest income will be apportioned between the real property and the other
property, and income from the arrangement will qualify for purposes of the 75%
gross income test only to the extent that the interest is allocable to the real
font-size:1.0pt;"> 410 94 To the
extent that interest income is derived from a loan where all or a portion of
the amount of interest payable is contingent, such income generally will
qualify for purposes of the gross income tests only if it is based upon the
gross receipts or sales and not the net income or profits of any person. Failure to Satisfy the Gross Income Tests. ARC intends to monitor its
sources of income, including any non-qualifying income received, so as to
ensure its compliance with the gross income tests. If ARC fails to satisfy one
or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, it may still
qualify as a REIT for the year if the failure to meet these tests was due to
reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and, following the
identification of such failure, it sets forth a description of each item of
gross 164 income that satisfies the gross income tests in a schedule
for the taxable year filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the
Treasury. It is not possible to state whether ARC would be entitled to the
benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief
provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving ARC,
it would not qualify as a REIT. As discussed above under Taxation of ARC,
even where these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed upon the
profit attributable to the amount by which it fails to satisfy the particular
gross income test. At the
close of each calendar quarter, ARC must also satisfy four tests relating to
the nature of its assets. First, at least 75% of the value of its total assets
must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items, U.S. government
securities and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased
with new capital. For this purpose, real estate assets include interests in
real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property,
stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs and certain kinds of mortgage
loans. Second, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets
purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT
subsidiaries, the value of any one issuers securities owned by ARC may not
exceed 5% of the value of its gross assets. Third, except for securities that
qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of
TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiarieont-weight:bold;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> Rental Income Occupancy Per Occupied Number of June 30, Homesite After
initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, ARC will not
lose its qualification as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the
end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If ARC
fails to satisfy the asset tests because it acquires securities during a
quarter, it can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying
assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. Commencing with its
taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if ARC fails the 5% asset test
or the 10% vote or value asset tests at the end of any quarter and such failure
is not cured within 30 days thereafter, it may dispose of sufficient
assets or otherwise come into compliance with such asset diversification
requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in
which the identification of the failure to satisfy these asset tests occurred)
to cure such a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of its assets at
the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000. In addition, if ARC fails any
of the asset tests (including a failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests) in
excess of the de minimis amount
described above, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause and not
willful neglect, it is permitted to avoid disqualification as a REIT, after the
30 day cure period, by taking steps including the disposition of
sufficient assets to meet the asset test or otherwise coming into compliance
with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after
the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to
satisfy the REIT asset test occurred) and paying a tax equal to the greater of
$50,000 or the highest corporate income tax rate (currently 35%) of the net
income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it
failed to satisfy the asset test. 165 ARC believes that its assets generally will be qualifying
assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. However, other debt instruments
secured by non-real estate assets, or unsecured debt securities may not be
qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. Moreover, values of some
assets, such as the value of the TRSs, may not be susceptible to a precise
determination and are subject to change in the future. Furthermore, the proper
classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. federal income tax
purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the
application of the REIT asset tests. As an example, an investment in equity
securities of a REIT issuer that were determined by the IRS to represent
debt securities of such issuer, such securities would also not qualify as real
estate assets. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not
contend that interests in subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers
(including REIT issuers) cause a violation of the REIT asset tests. Annual
Distribution Requirements In order to qualify as a REIT, ARC is required to
distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to its stockholders in
an amount at least equal to: (a) the sum of: 90% of its REIT taxable income (computed
without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and net capital gains) and
90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property (as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code); minus (b) the sum of specified items of non-cash income that exceeds
a percentage of its income. These
distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate or in the
following taxable year if such distributions are declared in October, November or
December of the taxable year, are payable to stockholders of record on a
specified date in any such month and are actually paid before the end of January of
the following year. Such distributions are treated as both paid by the REIT and
received by each stockholder on December 31 of the year in which they are
declared. In addition, at the REITs election, a distribution for a taxable
year may be declared before it timely files its tax return for the year and be
paid with or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration,
provided that such payment is made during the 12-month period following
the close of such taxable year. These distributions are taxable to stockholders
in the year in which paid, even though the distributions relate to the REITs
prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement. To the
extent that a REIT distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its REIT
taxable income, as adjusted, it will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate
tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, the REIT may elect to retain,
rather than distribute, its net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such
gains. If a REIT
fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85%
of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital
gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income
from prior periods, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such
required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed
(taking into account excess distributions from prior periods) and (y) the
amounts of income retained on which it paid corporate income tax. ARC intends
to make timely distributions so that it is not subject to the 4% excise tax. It is
possible that ARC, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash to meet the
distribution requirements due to timing differences between (a) the actual
receipt of cash, including receipt of distributions from its subsidiaries and (b) the
inclusion of items in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the
event that such timing differences occur, in order to meet the distribution
requirements, it might be necessary to arrange for shng:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:64.2pt;">
Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 2005 Per Month Shady
Creek TX 95 75.8 % $ 332 Creekside Estates TX 92 90.2 % 340 Hidden Oaks A REIT may be able to rectify a failure to meet the
distribution requirements for a year by paying deficiency dividends to
stockholders in a later year, which may be included in its deduction for
dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, the REIT may be able to
avoid losing its qualification as a REIT or 166 being taxed on amounts distributed
as deficiency dividends. However, it will be required to pay interest and a
penalty based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends. Net income derived from a prohibited transaction is subject
to a 100% tax. The term prohibited transaction generally includes a sale or
other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held
primarily for sale to customers, in the ordinary course of a trade or business
by a REIT, by a lower-tier partnership in which the REIT holds an equity
interest or by a borrower that has issued a shared appreciation mortgage or
similar debt instrument to the REIT. ARC intends to hold its properties for
investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of
owning and operating properties and to make sales of properties that are
consistent with its investment objectives. However, whether property is held primarily
for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on
the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any
particular property in which ARC holds a direct or indirect interest will not
be treated as property held for sale to customers or that certain safe-harbor
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that prevent such treatment will apply.
The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held
through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be
subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate income tax
rates. Foreclosure property is real property and any personal
property incident to such real property (1) that is acquired by a REIT as
a result of the REIT having bid on the property at foreclosure or having
otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or
process of law after there was a default (or default was imminent) on a lease
of the property or a mortgage loan held by the REIT and secured by the
property, (2) for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT
at a time when default was not imminent or anticipated and (3) for which
such REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure
property. REITs generally are subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate
(currently 35%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain
from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that would
otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any
gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has
been made will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited
transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute
inventory or dealer property in the hands of the selling REIT. ARC does not
anticipate that it will receive any income from foreclosure property that is
not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but, if it
does receive any such income, ARC intends to elect to treat the related
property as foreclosure property. Commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1,
2005, in the event that ARC violates a provision of the Internal Revenue Code
that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT, specified relief
provisions will be available to avoid such disqualification if (1) the
violation is due to reasonable cause, (2) it pays a penalty of $50,000 for
each failure to satisfy the provision and (3) the violation does not
include a violation under the gross income or asset tests described above (for
which other specified relief provisions are available). This cure provision
reduces the instances that could lead to a disqualification as a REIT for
violations due to reasonable cause. If ARC fails to qualify for taxation as a
REIT in any taxable year and none of the relief provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code apply, it will be subject to tax, including any applicable
alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates.
Distributions to its stockholders in any year in which it is not a REIT will
not be deductible, nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to
relief under the specific statutory provisions, it will also be 167 disqualified from re-electing to be
taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following a year during which
qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether, in all
circumstances, ARC will be entitled to statutory relief. Taxation of Taxable U.S.
Stockholders This
section summarizes the taxation of U.S. stockholders that are not tax-exempt
organizations. For these purposes, a U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of
ARCs stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a U.S. Holder If an
entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes holds ARCs stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner
generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. A partner of a partnership holding ARCs stock should consult its
own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the
partner of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ARCs stock by the
partnership. Distributions. Provided that ARC qualifies
as a REIT, distributions made to its taxable U.S. stockholders out of current
and accumulated earnings and profits, and not designated as capital gain
dividends, will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary dividend
income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for
corporations. In determining the extent to which a distribution with respect to
ARCs stock constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to
ARCs preferred stock, if any, and then to ARCs common stock. Dividends
received from REITs are generally not eligible to be taxed at the preferential
qualified dividend income rates applicable to individual U.S. stockholders who
receive dividends from taxable subchapter C corporations. In
addition, distributions from ARC that are designated as capital gain dividends
will be taxed to U.S. stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the
extent that they do not exceed the actual net capital gain of ARC for the
taxable year, without regard to the period for which the U.S. stockholder has
held its stock. To the extent that ARC elects under the applicable provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code to retain its net capital gains, U.S. stockholders
will be treated as having received, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the
undistributed capital gains as well as a corresponding credit for taxes paid by
ARC on such retained capital gains. U.S. stockholders will increase their
adjusted tax basis in their stock by the difference between their allocable
share of such retained capital gain and their share of the tax paid by ARC. Corporate
U.S. stockholders may be required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain
dividends as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are generally taxable at
maximum federal rates of 15% (through 2008) in the case of U.S. stockholders
who are individuals, and 35% for corporations. Capital gains attributable to
the sale of depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are
subject to a 25% maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for individual U.S.
stockholders who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed
depreciation deductions. Distributions
in excess of ARCs current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be
taxable to a U.S. stockholder to the extent that they do not exceed the
adjusted tax basis of the U.S. stockholders shares in respect of which the
distributions were made, but rather will reduce the adjusted tax basis of these
shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of
an individual U.S. stockholders shares, they will be included in income
as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been
held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend declared by ARC in
October, November or December of any year and payablstyle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
TX 87 81.6 % 326 El Dorado * TX 79 73.4 % 227 Mulberry Heights With respect to U.S. stockholders who are taxed at the
rates applicable to individuals, ARC may elect to designate a portion of its
distributions paid to such U.S. stockholders as qualified dividend income.
A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified
dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. stockholders as capital
gain, provided that holding period and other requirements are met by both ARC
and the U.S. stockholder. The maximum amount of ARCs distributions eligible to
be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the
sum of: (a) the qualified dividend income received by ARC during such
taxable year from non-REIT C corporations (including dividends attributable to
any TRSs, which are subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that ARC
designates such dividends as qualified dividend income); (b) the excess of any undistributed REIT taxable income
recognized during the immediately preceding year over the U.S. federal income
tax paid by ARC with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and (c) the excess of any income
recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a
built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a
non-REIT C corporation over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with
respect to such built-in gain. In general, a U.S. stockholder will realize gain or loss
upon the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of ARCs stock in an
amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any
property and the amount of cash received in such disposition and the U.S.
stockholders adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time of the disposition.
In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate
U.S. stockholders upon the sale or disposition of shares of ARCs stock will be
subwidth:13.95pt;">
TX 67 89.6 % 348 Zoppe's Passive Activity Losses and
Investment Interest Limitations Distributions made by ARC and gain arising from the sale or
exchange by a U.S. stockholder of ARCs stock will not be treated as passive
activity income. As a result, U.S. stockholders will not be able to apply any passive
losses against income or gain relating to ARCs stock. Distributions made by
ARC, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will
be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment
interest limitation. A U.S. stockholder that elects to treat capital gain
dividends, capital gains from the disposition of stock or qualified dividend
income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation
will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such amounts. Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting
TX 60 ARC will
report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during
each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup
withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with
respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or 169 comes within other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social
security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding
and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct
taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to
penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In
addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain
distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign
status. ARC must
report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of
dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such
dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the
information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S.
stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A
non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable
certification requirements are met. Payment of
the proceeds of a sale of ARCs stock within the United States is subject to
both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner
certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the
payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial
owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an
exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARCs stock conducted through
certain United States related financial intermediaries is subject to
information reporting (but not backup withholding) unless the financial
intermediary has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner
is a non-U.S. stockholder and specified conditions are met or an exemption is
otherwise established. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holders U.S. federal income
tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S.
Stockholders U.S.
tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing
trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S.
federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxant-size:1.0pt;"> 85.0 % 201 El Lago II TX Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders that are social clubs,
voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit
trusts, and qualified group legal services plans exempt from U.S. federal
income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of
the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, are subject to different UBTI rules,
which generally will require them to characterize distributions from us as
UBTI. In certain circumstances, a pension trust (1) that is
described in Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, (2) is
tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (3) that
owns more than 10% of ARCs stock could be required to treat a percentage of
the dividends from us as UBTI if we are a pension-held REIT. ARC will not be
a pension-held REIT unless (1) either (A) one pension trust owns more
than 25% of the value of ARCs stock, or (B) a group of pension trusts,
each individually holding more than 10% of the value of ARCs stock,
collectively owns more than 50% of such stock; 170 and (2)&nbsding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
59 84.7 % 360 Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders are urged to consult their own
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax
consequences of owning ARC stock. Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ARC stock
applicable to non-U.S. stockholders of ARC stock. For purposes of this summary,
a non-U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of ARC stock that is not a U.S.
stockholder. The discussion is based on current law and is for general
information only. It addresses only selective and not all aspects of U.S.
federal income taxation. Ordinary Dividends. The portion of dividends
received by non-U.S. stockholders payable out of ARCs earnings and profits
that are not attributable to gains from sales or exchanges of U.S. real
property interests and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the non-U.S. stockholder will generally be subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced or eliminated by an
applicable income tax treaty. Under some treaties, however, lower rates
generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs.
Dallas/Ft.
Worth, Texas Non-Dividend Distributions. Unless (A) ARC stock
constitutes a U.S. real property interest, or USRPI, or (B) either (1) if
the non-U.S. stockholders investment in ARC stock is effectively connected
with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. stockholder (in which
case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S.
stockholders with respect to such gain) or (2) if the non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the
United States (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to
a 30% tax on the individuals net capital gain for the year), distributions by
ARC which are not dividends out of its earnings and profits will not be subject
to U.S. federal income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at
which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed
current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject
to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the non-U.S.
stockholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is
subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of ARCs
current and accumulated earnings and profits. If ARCs stock constitutes a
USRPI, as described below, distributions by ARC in excess of the sum of its
earnings and profits plus the non-U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in its
ARC stock will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act
of 1980, or FIRPTA, at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains
rates, that would apply to a U.S. stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as
the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable
withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds
the stockholders share of ARCs earnings and profits. 171 Capital Gain Dividends. Under FIRPTA, a distribution
made by ARC to a non-U.S. stockholder, to the extent attributable to gains from
dispositions oft size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 7,223
Dispositions of Our Stock. Unless ARC stock constitutes
a USRPI, a sale of the stock by a non-U.S. stockholder generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income taxation under FIRPTA. The stock will not be
treated as a USRPI if less than 50% of ARCs assets throughout a prescribed
testing period consist of interests in real property located within the United
States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a
capacity as a creditor. ARC does not expect that more than 50% of its assets
will consist of interests in real property located in the United States. In addition, ARC stock will not constitute a USRPI if ARC
is a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a
REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in
value of its outstanding stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S.
stockholders. ARC believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a
domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of ARC stock should not
be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because ARC stock is widely held,
ARC cannot assure its investors that it is or will remain a domestically
controlled REIT. Even if ARC does not qualify as a domestically controlled
REIT, a non-U.S. stockholders sale of ARC stock nonetheless will generally not
be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI, provided that (a) the
ARC stock owned is of a class that is regularly traded, as defined by
applicable Treasury Department regulations, on an established securities
market, and (b) the selling non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or
constructively, 5% or less of ARCs outstanding stock of that class at all
times during a specified testing period. If gain on the sale of ARC stock were subject to taxation
under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. stockholder would be subject to the same treatment
as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, subject to applicable
alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of
non-resident alien individuals, and the purchaser of the stock could be
required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the
IRS. Gain from the sale of ARC stock that would not otherwise be
subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a
non-U.S. stockholder in two cases: (a) if the non-U.S. stockholders
investment in ARC stock is effectivelt> 82.7 % $ 349 Atlanta, Georgia 172 non-U.S. stockholder,
the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S.
stockholder with respect to such gain, or (b) if the non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the
United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on
the individual s capital gain. Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the
amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax
withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject
to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a
corporation or comes within other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social
security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding
and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer
identification number or social security number may also be subject to
penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In
addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain
distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status. ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S.
stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld
with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required.
Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may
also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax
treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless
applicable certification requirements are met. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock within the
United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting
unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a
non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to
know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder
otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC
stock conducted through certain United States related financial intermediaries
is subject tobreak-after:avoid;"> Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holders U.S. federal income tax
liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. State, Local and Foreign Taxes ARC and its subsidiaries and stockholders may be subject to
state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in
which it or they transact business, own property or reside. ARC owns interests
in properties located in a number of jurisdictions, and may be required to file
tax returns in certain of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax
treatment of ARC and its stockholders may not conform to the U.S. federal
income tax treatment discussed above. Any foreign taxes incurred by ARC would
not pass through to stockholders as a credit against their U.S. federal income
tax liability. Prospective stockholders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign income and
other tax laws on an investment in ARCs stock. 173 Merrill
Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated was the initial purchaser for the original offering of the notes
in private placements. We were advised by the initial purchaser that it sold
the notes to qualified institutional buyers, as defined in Rule 144A
under the Securities Act, in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. The notes and the shares of ARC common
stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes that may be offered pursuant to
this prospectus are being offered by the selling securityholders, which
includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their
successors. The
following table sets forth information with respect to the selling securityholders
and the principal amounts of notes and ARC common stock beneficially owned by
each selling securityholder that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus. The
information is based on information provided to us by or on behalf of the
selling securityholders on or prior to October 21, 2005. The selling securityholders may offer all, some or
none of the notes or the ARC common stock into which the notes are convertible.
Because the selling securityholders may offer all or some portion of the notes or
common stock, we cannot estimate the amount of the notes or common stock that
will be held by the selling securityholders after any of these sales. Information
concerning other selling securityholders will be set forth in prospectus
supplements or, if appropriate, post-effective amendments to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, from time to time, if required. The
percentage of notes outstanding beneficially owned by each selling
securityholder is based on $96.6 million aggregate principal amount of notes
outstanding. For the
purposes of the following table, the number of shares of ARC common stock
beneficially owned has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of
the Exchange Act, and such information is not necessarily indicative of
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under Rule 13d-3, beneficial
ownership includes any shares as to which a selling securityholder has sole or
shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which that selling
securityholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this
prospectus through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other rights.
The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes
shown in the table assumes conversion of the full amount of notes held by each
selling securityholder at an initial conversion rate of 69.8812 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and a cash payment in lieu of
any fractional shares. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the notes shown in the table below also assumes that we would
satisfy our conversion obligation entirely with common stock. This conversion
price is subject to adjustment in certain events. Accordingly, the number of
conversion shares may increase or decrease from time to time. The number of
shares of ARC common stock owned by the other selling securityholders or any
future transferee from any such holder assumes that they do not beneficially
own any ARC common stock other than the common stock into which the notes are
convertible. No selling
securityholder named in the table below beneficially owns two percent or more of ARCs common stock, based
on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding on July 27, 2005. None
of the selling securityholders currently listed in the following table has, or
within the past three years has had, any position, office or other material
relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates. 174 Principal Amount of Notes(1) Number of Shares of Common Stock(1)(2) Selling Security Holder Beneficially Owned Percentage Beneficially Percentage of ARC CC
Convertible Arbitrage, Ltd.(4) 2,500,000 2.59 174,703 0.43 Mohican VCA Master Fund, Ltd. 750,000 0.78 52,411 0.13 Frontpoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P.(5) 1,500,000 1.55 104,822 0.26 NFJ Dividend, Premium & Interest Strategy Fund 2,500,000
Hunter Ridge GA 850 84.8 % $ 350 Landmark Village GA 2.59 174,703 0.43 Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income
Fund 7,500,000 7.76 524,109 1.28 Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income
Fund II 6,500,000 6.73 454,228 1.11 509 84.9 % 338 Vicis Capital Master Fund 5,000,000 5.18 349,406 0.85 All other holders of notes or future transferees,
pledgees, donees, assignees or successors of any such holders(6) 70,350,000 Shadowood GA 507 92.9 % 361 Riverdale (Colonial Coach)
72.83 4,916,142 (7) 12.00 (1) Since
the date on which we were provided with the information regarding their notes,
selling securityholders may have acquired, sold, transferred or otherwise
disposed of all or a portion of their notes or the underlying shares of ARC
common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. Accordingly, the information
provided here for any particular securityholder may understate or overstate, as
the case may be, such securityholders current ownership. The aggregate
principal amount of notes outstanding as of the date of this registration
statement is $96,600,000, which is the aggregate principal amount of notes
registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part. Any such changed information will be set forth in supplements to this
registration statement if and when necessary. (2) For
purposes of presenting the number of shares of our common stock beneficially
owned by holders of notes, we assume an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC
common stock per each $1,000 principal amount of notes (the initial exchange
rate), which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately
$14.31 per share of ARC common stock, and a cash payment in lieu of the
issuance of any fractional share interest. However, the conversion price is
subject to adjustment as described under Description of NotesExchange RightsExchange
Rate Adjustments. As a result, the number of shares of ARC common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes, and as a consequence, the number of shares
beneficially owned by the holders of notes, may increase or decrease in the
future. (3) Percentages
based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding as of July 27,
2005. (4) Selling
securityholder hase="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> GA 436 90.1 % 336 Lamplighter Village (6) We
are unable to provide the names of certain holders of notes and/or ARC common
stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at this time because they have not
provided us with information and/or their notes are evidenced by a global note
that has been deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede &
Co., as DTCs nominee. Information concerning any such holders who are not
listed in the above table will be set forth in post-effective amendments from
time to time, if and when required. (7) Assumes
that any other holder of notes or any future transferee from any such holder
does not beneficially own any of ARCs common stock other than the shares of
ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at the initial exchange
rate.
GA 430 93.3 % 381 Stone Mountain We are
registering the notes and shares on behalf of the selling securityholders. The
selling securityholders and their successors, which includes their transferees,
distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors, may sell the notes and
the underlying common stock directly to purchasers or through underwriters,
broker-dealers or agents. Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive
compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the
selling securityholders or the purchasers. These discounts, concessions or
commissions may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions
involved. The notes and the underlying ARC common stock may be sold
in one or more transactions: · at fixed prices; · at prevailing market prices
at the time of sale; · at prices related to such
prevailing market prices;
GA 354 · at negotiated prices. Such sales may be effected in transactions in the following
manner (which may involve crosses or block transactions): · on any national securities
exchange or quotation; · in the over-the-counter
market; · in transactions otherwise
than on such exchanges or services or in the over-the-counter market; · through the writing of
options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
or · through the settlement of
short sales. Selling
securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or
other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of the
notes or the underlying ARC common stock and deliver these securities to close
out such short positions, or lend or pledge the notes or the ARC common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes to broker-dealers that in turn may sell
these securities. From time
to time, one or more of the selling securityholders may distribute, devise,
gift, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in some or all of the
securities owned by them. Any such distributees, devisees or donees will be
deemed to be selling securityholders. Any such pledges, secured parties or
persons to whom the securities have been hypothecated will, upon foreclosure in
the event of default, be deemed to be selling securityholders. The
aggregate proceeds to the selling securityholders from the sale of the notes or
underlying ARC common stock will be the purchase price of the notes or ARC
common stock, less any discounts and commissions. A selling securityholder
reserves the right to accept and, together with its agents, to reject, any
proposed purchase of notes or common stock to 7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.15pt;">
83.6 % 383 Castlewood Estates ARCs
underlying common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. We do not
intend to list the notes for trading on any national securities exchange or on
the Nasdaq National Market. We cannot guarantee that any trading market will
develop for the notes. The notes
and underlying ARC common stock may be sold in some states only through
registered or licensed brokers or dealers. The selling securityholders and any
underwriters, broker-dealers or agents that 176 participate in the sale of the notes and common stock into
which the notes are convertible may be underwriters within the meaning of Section 2(11)
of the Securities Act. Any discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they
earn on any resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and commissions
under the Securities Act. Selling securityholders who are underwriters within
the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The selling
securityholders have acknowledged that they understand their obligations to
comply, and have agreed to comply, with the prospectus delivery requirements
and other provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the
respective rules thereunder, particularly Regulation M thereunder, in
connection with any offering of the securities offered hereby. In
addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale
pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act may be
sold under Rule nt size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">GA 300 97.7 % 324 Woodlands of Kennesaw GA If
required, the specific notes or common stock to be sold, the names of the
selling securityholders, the respective purchase prices and public offering
prices, the names of any agent, dealer or underwriter, and any applicable
commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will be set forth
in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Pursuant to
the registration rights agreement filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, we and the selling
securityholders will be indemnified by each other against certain liabilities,
including certain liabilities under the Securities Act or will be entitled to
contribution in connection with these liabilities. We have
agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses incidental to the registration,
offering and sale of the notes and underlying common stock to the public, other
than applicable transfer taxes and commissions, fees and discounts of
underwriters, brokers, dealers and agents. We have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of this
registration statement until the holders of the notes and the common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities
immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under
the Securities Act. We may suspend sales under the registration statement upon
notice to the selling securityholders in order to update the registration
statement or otherwise comply with federal securities laws. 177 The validity of the notes was passed upon for us by
Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C., Denver, Colorado. The validity of the
shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes was passed upon
for us by Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland. Certain tax matters will be passed
upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New
York. The
consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities LP as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004 included in this prospectus have been so included
in reliance on the report of an" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 267 89.9 % 390 Smoke Creek GA The
consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
incorporated in this prospectus by reference to ARCs Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been so incorporated in reliance
on the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. 178 F-2 Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 264 83.3 % 353 Four Seasons GA Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 F-4 Consolidated
Statements of Partners Capital for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003
215 88.4 % 313 Marnelle GA 201 95.5 % 345 Friendly Village GA 203 98.0 % 376 Plantation Estates GA 130 93.1 % F-5 Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 F-6 F-8 Unaudited
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004 F-38 F-39 309 Golden Valley GA Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30,
2005 F-40 F-41 Schedule IIIReal Estate and Related Depreciation
as of December 31, 2004 F-61 F-1 126 73.8 % 329 Lakeside To the
Partners of Affordable Residential Communities LP: In our opinion, the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners capital and cash flows present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Affordable Residential Communities LP and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion the accompanying
financial statement schedule Schedule III presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of
these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP Denver, Colorado October 25,
2005 F-2 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
LP December 31, 2004 2003 Assets Rental
and other property, net $ 1,532,780 $ 863,515 Assets
held for sale 54,123 44,362 Cash and
cash equivalents 39,802 26,626 Restricted
cash 13,669 Tenant,
notes and other receivables, net 19,029 GA 102 92.2 % 261 Jonesboro (Atlanta Meadows) GA 75 100.0 % 282 Atlanta,
GeorgiaTotal/Weighted Average 4,969 89.2 % $ 349 Salt Lake
City, Utah 8,468 Inventory 11,230 3,878 Loan
origination costs, net 14,403 11,921 Loan
reserves 31,019 32,414 Goodwill 85,264 86,127 Lease
intangibles and customer relationships, net 19,106 10,987 Prepaid
expenses and other assets 6,476 24,102 Total
assets $
Camelot UT 379 99.5 % $ 385 $ 1,126,069 Liabilities and Partners
Capital Notes
payable and preferred interest $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 Liabilities
related to assets held for sale Country Club Mobile Estates UT
29,516 16,975 Accounts
payable and accrued expenses 37,877 19,828 Distributions
payable 323 99.1 % 372 15,505 Tenant
deposits and other liabilities 12,773 7,655 Total
liabilities 1,097,293 817,852 Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) Partners capital (see Note 4) Preferred
OP units 144,250 Common OP units: Crescentwood Village UT 273 97.8 % 368 Windsor Mobile Estates UT
General partner 539,382 265,578 Limited partners 32,307 42,639 715,939 308,217 97.6 % 384
Total liabilities and partners capital $ 1,813,232 UT 237 75.9 % 323 Riverdale
$ 1,126,069 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-3 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
LP For the Year Ended 2004 2003 2002 Revenue Rental
income $ 187,267 $ 125,915 $ 92,610 Sales of
manufactured homes 15,221 21,681 UT 210 96.2 % 321 Villa West UT 31,942 Utility
and other income 20,065 15,599 11,942 211 94.3 % 375 Lakeview Estates 104 Total
revenue
UT 209 &n:10.0pt;">222,657 163,195 136,494 Expenses Property
operations 75bsp; 98.6 % 353 Sunset Vista UT 44,295 33,341 Real
estate taxes 16,621 10,247 204 80.4 % 352 pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 6,633 Cost of
manufactured homes sold 18,267 18,357 25,826 Retail
home sales, finance, insurance and other operations 8,198 7,382
Riverside 8,582 Property
management 7,127 5,527 4,105 General
and administrative 29,361 16,855 UT 200 97.5 % 455 Sundown 13,087 Initial
public offering costs 4,417 Early
termination of debt 16,685 Depreciation
and amortization 72,014
UT 194 93.3 % 339 Viking Villa 37,058 Real
estate and retail asset impairment 3,591 1,385 Goodwill
impairment 863 13,557 Interest
expense
UT 191 tyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> 56,892 57,386 43,804 Total
expenses 309,186 207,901 185,993 Interest
income (1,616 ) (1,439 ) (1,390 ) Loss from
continuing operations (84,913 ) (43,267 ) (48,109 ) Income
from discontinued operations 1,915 31 94.2 % 273 Washington Mobile Estates UT 186 89.2 % 321 Overpass Point MHC Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations (8,549 ) 3,333 Net loss (91,547 ) (39,903 ) (47,069 ) Preferred unit distributions (9,752 ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $
UT 175 68.0 % 276 Brookside (47,069 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders General partner $ (95,445 ) $ (34,386 ) $ (40,818 ) Limited partners UT 170 91.2 % 350 95 (5,854 ) (5,517 ) (6,251 ) $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Net loss
per common OP unit from continuing operations $ (2.34 ) $ (2.20 ) $ (2.94 ) Income (loss) per common OP unit from discontinued
operations (0.17 ) 0.17 0.06 Net loss per common OP unit $ (2.51 ) $ (2.03 )
Rental Income $ (2.88 ) Weighted average OP units outstanding Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 40,413 19,699 16,353 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-4 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Common OP Unitholders General
Per Month Western
Mobile Estates UT 143 79.7 % Limited Preferred $ 322 Willow Creek Estates Balance January 1, 2002 $ 158,957 $ 62 $ $ 159,019 Sales of
OP units 33,760 UT 137
33,760 OP Units
retired in the Reorganization (62 ) 92.7 % 169 Kopper View MHC (62 ) OP Units
issued in the Reorganization 137,652 64,820 202,472 Transfer
from limited partners to general partner resulting from issuance of OP units 10,413 (10,413 ) Net loss (40,818 ) (6,251 ) (es New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> UT 61 96.7 % 340 Redwood Village UT ) Balance
December 31, 2002 299,964 48,156 348,120 Net loss (34,386 ) (5,517 ) (39,903 ) Balance
December 31, 2003 265,578 42,639 308,217 Issuance
of common OP units 410,724
40 97.5 % 372 Salt Lake
City, UtahTotal/Weighted Average Issuance
of preferred OP units 144,250 144,250 Restricted
common units issued, net of current year amortization 199 3,792 92.1 199 Forfeiture
of restricted common OP units
% $ 348 Front Range
of Colorado Harmony Road &n 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> (150 ) CO 486 89.1 % $ 425 Stoneybrook (150 ) Redemption
of OP units (125 ) (125 ) Transfer
of capital 1,737 (1,737 CO ) Distributions
to OP unitholders (44,469 ) (2,616 ) (47,085 ) Net loss (95,445 426
) (5,854 ) (101,299 ) Other
comprehensive incomemark to market of interest rate swap 1,208 1,208 Comprehensive
loss (100,091 ) Balance December 31, 2004 $ 539,382 % 399 Wikiup CO $ 32,307 339 96.8 % 464 $ 144,250 $ 715,939 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-5 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Cash flow
from operating activities Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Ad 0pt;width:198.05pt;">
Villa West CO 331 89.1 %
Depreciation and amortization 72,014 46,467 37,058 365 The Meadows Adjustments to fair value for interest rate caps 241 1,561 OP unitholders grant compensation expense 10,120 Preferred unit distribution declared 8,966
CO 303 89.1 % 484 Mountainside Estates CO 227 89.9 % 498 Thornton Estates CO 208 98.6 % 453 Countryside CO 173 PPU distributions declared 786 % 332 Inspiration Valley CO
Non-cash REIT IPO related costs 389 139 89.2 % 488
Early termination of debt 10,358 Pleasant Grove CO 112 89.3 % 423 Loveland CO 113 96.5 % 404 Sheridan CO 111 91.9 % 475 Grand Meadow CO 104 Retail home sales impairment and other expense 1,385 Real estate asset impairment 3,591 Goodwill impairment 863 13,557 Depreciation included in income from discontinued
operations 3,134 2,613 2,026 (Gain) loss on sale oft;width:5.15pt;">
100.0 % 361 Mobile Gardens
8,549 (3,333 ) Rent expense related to vacated office space CO 100 864 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions 9,322 2,596 7,148 Net cash provided by operating activities 93.0 % 474 Shady Lane CO
27,034 10,689 14,281 Cash flow
from investing activities 64 90.6 % 355 Acquisition of Hometown communities (507,136 )
Commerce Heights CO Acquisition of communities and manufactured homes (87,693 ) (34,288 ) (121,611 ) Proceeds from community sales 36,922 51 98.0 % 383 Front
Range of ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 14,879 Deposits and deferred acquisition costs on purchase of
Hometown assets (15,559 ) Community improvements and equipment purchases (49,708 ) (12,725 ) (15,862 ) Net cash used in investing activities (607,615 ) (47,693 ) (137,473 ) Cash flow
from financing activities
3,287 89.1 % $ 429 Kansas City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas Cash flow
from REIT IPO
Springdale Lake MO 441 88.7 % $ 292 River Oaks * KS 397 80.9 % 279 Northland MO Common stock offering 438,078 Preferred stock offering 125,000 Common stock offering expenses (37,421 ) Preferred stock offering expenses (5,892 ) Cash flow
from REIT IPO related financing transactions Debt issued in the financing transactions 500,000 281 98.9 % 285 Ridgewood Estates KS 277
Debt paid in the financing transactions (439,048 ) Payment of loan origination costs (8,122 ) Release of restricted cash 12,278 89.9 % 271 Easy Living Release of loan reserves 19,089 KS 261 96.2 % New loan
reserves (14,247 ) 293 Meadowood KS 250 91.2 % See notes to consolidated financial statements F-6 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP For the Year Ended December 31,
2004 2003 2002 Cash flow from the Reorganization: Debt
issued in the Reorganization 578,000 Debt paid
in the Reorganization (431,165 ) Redemption
of Limited Partnership interests (112,966 ) Payment
of loan costs (13,365 ) Net
release of restricted cash 2,609 Harper Woods KS Net
release of loan reserves 4,695 Other
140 88.6 % 322 (4,678 ) Proceeds
from the issuance of common OP units 33,760 Deferred
common and preferred OP unit issuance costs Shawnee Hills * (1,026 ) Proceeds
from issuance of debt 96,421 49,038 126,119 Deferred
debt issuance costs KS 109 73.4 % 298 Pine Hills
Repayment
of debt (42,660 ) (25,356 ) (14,416 ) Payment
of common distributions (33,563 ) Payment
of preferred distributions (7,247 ) Payment
of partnership preferred distributions (524 ) Repurchase
of OP units (125 ) Restricted
cash 1,391 (240 ) (1,906 ) KS 93 90.3 % 285 Riverside KS 93Loan
reserves (3,447 ) 6,867 (28,185 ) Loan
origination costs (6,204 ) (3,894 ) (715 ) Net cash
provided by financing activities 593,757 25,389 137,787 Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 97.8 % 285 Brittany Place KS 86 91.9 % 305 Kansas
City/Lawrence/Topeka, Missouri/Kansas (11,615 ) 14,595 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 26,626 38,241 23,646 Cash and
cash equivalents, end of period $ 39,802 $ 26,626 $ 38,241 Non-cash financing and investing transactions: Debt
assumed in connection with acquisitions $ 96,898 $ 4,294 $ 5,944 Preferred
OP units issued in connection with acquisitions 2,428 89.6 %
25,142 Distributions
declared but not paid 13,524 Accrual
of loan origination costs 2,000 $ 285 Jacksonville,
Florida OP units issued
in the Reorganization 64,820 Common
stock issued in the Reorganization 137,652 Limited
Partnership debt assumed in the Reorganization
Portside 233,915 Supplemental cash flow information: FL 928 96.8 % $ 335 CV-Jacksonville FL 643 86.3 % 361 Ortega Village FL 284 73.9 % 333 96 Rental Income
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 56,765 $ 56,941 36,077 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-7 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP 1. Business, Liquidity and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Affordable
Residential Communities LP (formerly Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP)
(the Partnership, the Operating Partnership or OP) is a limited
partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation
of manufactured home communities, the rental of manufactured homes, the retail
sale of manufactured homes and other related businesses. We were organized in July of
1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is
Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (ARC or REIT) (formerly known
as ARC IV REIT Inc.). As
described in Note 2, on May 2, 2002, ARC completed the acquisition of
Affordable Residential Communities, L.P. I (LP I), Affordable Residential
Communities, L.P., II (LP II), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., III
(LP III) (collectively, LP I, LP II, and LP III are the Limited Partnerships)
and their respective subsidiaries and certain of the assets and subsidiaries of
ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (Holdings) (the Reorganization). As of December 31,
2004, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of 13 communities classified
as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 63,661 homesites
(net of 2,566 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states
with occupancy of 81.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas,
with 11.4% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.8% of our total
homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front
Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas
City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas, with 3.8% of our total homesites. We also conduct
a retail home sales business. On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its initial public offering (IPO) of 22.3 million
shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares
sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock
priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock
and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and
before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592
shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. The
proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were contributed to the
Operating Partnership, and the Partnership issued 23.1 million common OP
Units and 5.0 million Series A Preferred OP Units to ARC (See
Note 3). With the proceeds from ARCs IPO and the financing
transaction, we acquired 87 manufactured home communities from Hometown
America, L.L.C. (Hometown). We acquired an additional three communities on April 9,
2004 upon the completion of the mortgage debt loan assumption process. The 90
acquired communities are located in 24 states and total 26,406 homesites. The
total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately
$615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of
$93.1 million (See Note 3). Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Basis of presentation The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts but
the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only
for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all
significant inter-entity balances and transactions. F-8 The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported
amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate actual
results may differ from previously estimated amounts. We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to
conform to current year presentation. Rental and Other Property We carry
rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize
significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset
quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their
estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as
incurred. Depreciation is computed primarily
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The
estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are
primarily as follows: Asset Class Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Deerpointe
Estimated Useful Manufactured home communities and improvements 10 to 30 Buildings 10 to 20 Rental homes 10 Furniture and other equipment 5 Computer software and hardware 3
In June 2002,
we changed our estimate of the depreciable lives of our communities from
20 years to 30 years to conform to industry experience regarding the
estimated useful life of manufactured home communities, improvements and
buildings. The change resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense by
approximately $7.3 million or $0.45 per unit. Subsequent
to December 31, 2004, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of
our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes will now be
depreciated to an estimated salvage value after 3 years of service in our
rental home portfolio. This change was made to conform to our intent to sell
homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the
repairs and maintenance costs typically incurred on older homes. This change
did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental
property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full asset
recoverability is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental
property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected
net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be
impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the assets
carrying amount to determine if a writedown is required. If this review
indicates that the assets carrying amount will not be fully recoverable, we
would reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value.
During 2004, we recorded an impairment charge on rental property of
approximately $500,000 (see Note 12). For the years ended December 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002, we recorded no impairment charges. F-9 The Partnership considers a community to be a discontinued
operation when: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset,
supported by a Board resolution granting approval to proceed with the sale;
(ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition
subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets;
(iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete
the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset
is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition
as a completed sale, within one year; (v) the asset is being actively
marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair
value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is
unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan
will be withdrawn. In accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, SFAS, No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each
of our assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value,
less cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances
and corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all
comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if
applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance.
Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the communities
classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of operations of
the assets sold and those classified as held for sale are reported as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognize any estimated
losses on the sales of communities in the period in which the properties are
discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the sales of communities when
realized. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the expected
disposal, the expected manner and timing of that disposal, and, if not
separately presented on the face of the balance sheet, the carrying amounts of
the major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal
group is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We disclose in the
notes to our financial statements (and on the face of the income statement) the
gain or loss recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and, if
applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax profit or loss reported in
discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable, in the notes to our
financial statements the segment in which the long-lived asset is reported under. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid
investments with maturities less than 90 days from the date of purchase. Restricted Cash and Loan Reserves Restricted cash and loan reserves represent reserves
established pursuant to the debt agreements as described in Note 6. Notes Receivable Notes receivable from sales of manufactured homes or
assumed in connection with acquisitions are generally collateralized by
manufactured homes located in our communities and is recorded at face value
less allowances for bad debt less a market discount which the Company feels approximates
the fair market value of the note. Reserves for Bad Debts We maintain allowances for bad debts on tenant receivables
and notes receivable. We fully reserve amounts due from tenants greater than
sixty days past due. We establish reserves for notes receivable based on
managements periodic review of specific notes considered wholly or partially
uncollectible, plus an amount for estimated future uncollectible amounts based
on historical experience. At December 31, F-10 2004 and 2003, approximately
$1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, was reserved for tenant
and notes receivables. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, we charged $3.9 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, to bad debt expense. Inventory Inventory consists of new and used manufactured homes held
for sale, including costs and materials associated with preparing the units for
sale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on
specific identification reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates earned
from manufacturers ($14,000 and $101,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively). Loan Origination Costs We capitalize loan origination costs associated with
financing. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the effective interest method, over the repayment term of the
loans. We amortized $5.9 million, $3.2 million and $4.1 million
of loan origination costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization. The
charge in 2002 includes $1.6 million for previously incurred loan origination
costs of debt paid in the Reorganization. Accumulated amortization was
$6.4 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
Reorganization completed on May 2, 2002. We periodically assess and adjust
the value of the goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
recorded an impairment charge of $863,000 related to our insurance business as
our insurance business estimated fair value was less than its carrying value as
of December 31, 2004. For the year end December 31, 2002, we recorded
an impairment change of $13.6 million. For additional discussion, see
Note 2. Lease Intangibles and Customer Relationships We establish the value of lease
intangibles and customer relationships at the date of acquisition of a
community. We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to
community acquisitions on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period
that a resident lives in the community (five years). We amortize lease
intangibles and customer relationships related to acquisitions of rental homes
on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year). The acquired community
customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on
a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of
economic benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the
intangible assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably
estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool customer contracts on
a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible a1.0pt;"> FL 212 82.1 % $ 391 Magnolia Circle
2005 $ 6,087FL 127 81.9 % 394 Connie Jean 2006 6,003 2007 3,827 2008 2,787 2009 402 Total $ 19,106 F-11 Accumulated amortization was $13.3 million and
$7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Impairment of Intangible Assets We combine our finite-lived intangible assets, which
consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles, with other assets located
in each community (primarily consisting of real estate assets) as the
manufactured home community is the lowest level for which cash flows are
readily identifiable. Whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the asset group is
tested for recoverability. If the asset group is not recoverable from the
undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset group, an impairment loss is
recognized as the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and
the estimated fair value of the asset group. Prepaid
Expenses and Other Assets Included in
prepaid expenses and other assets are prepaid insurance and other prepaid
expenses, as well as earnest money deposits which are treated as deposits until
the underlying transactions are complete. Prepaid
expenses and other assets as of December 31, 2004 of $6.5 million were
lower than the $24.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2003,
primarily due to $17.5 million of earnest money deposits held in escrow at
December 31, 2003 related to the Hometown acquisition. Revenue Recognition We
recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from
residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are
generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident
and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home
renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement
between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize
it in income when earned. We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we
receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title,
possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no
further obligations to perform significant additional activities. Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization We capitalize our interest costs (using our average cost of
borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on
development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities
through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with SFAS
No. 34, Capitalization of Interest
and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs
and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively.
The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general
construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes, and, in the
case of the communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, the cost of the
vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a
manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized $3.9 million of
interest and internal costs during 2004. No significant interest or internal
costs were capitalized during 2003 and 2002. Income Taxes We are a partnership for tax purposes and do not pay
federal or state income taxes. Our income is taxed to our members in their
individual returns, and we therefore do not record an income tax provision. F-12 FL 62 79.0 % Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair value of our debt was approximately
$1,028.6 million and $813.0 million at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. The fair value of our other financial instruments
approximates their carrying vales at December 31, 2004 and 2003. Interest Rate Caps and Swaps We use
derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging exposures to
fluctuations in interest rates. As required under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, we record all of our derivative instruments in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. For a derivative designated as a
cash flow hedge, we initially report the effective portion of the derivatives
gain or loss as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and
subsequently reclassify it into earnings when the forecasted transaction
affects earnings. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss
associated with a cash flow hedge in earnings immediately. During 2004, we
entered into a $100.0 million interest rate swap agreement with an
unrelated third party effectively fixing the interest rate on
$100.0 million of our variable rate debt at 5.06%. The swap has been
designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. At December 31,
2004, $1.2 million of unrealized gain related to this derivative
instrument has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the
accompanying December 31, 2004 balance sheet. We further manage our exposure to interest rate risk
through the use of interest rate caps which protect us from movements in
interest rates above specified levels. We immediately recognize in earnings the
change in the fair value of gains or losses associated with interest rate caps.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded interest
charges of $241,000, $115,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, related to
the change in the fair value of the interest rate caps. At December 31,
2004 and 2003 theRoman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 287 Jacksonville,
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 2,256 88.2 % Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(a component of partners capital) as of December 31, 2004 represent
unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap which qualifies as a cash flow
hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Our
comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
$100.1 million. There were no unrecognized gains or losses related to our
interest rate swap during 2003 and 2002, and therefore, our comprehensive loss
for 2003 and 2002, is equal to our net loss to Common OP Unitholders as
reported on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. OP Unit Grants We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 representing
the value of 530,000 Common OP Units we granted February 18, 2004 under
our 2003 equity incentive plan that vested at the date of grant. We valued the
units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO. In
addition, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP Units that vest over five
years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited.
In October 2004, an additional 37,500 of restricted OP Units were
forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the remaining 15,000
outstanding restricted OP Units as unearned compensation on the balance sheet
(a component of partners capital) and are amortizing the balance ratably over
the vesting period. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. yle="border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.0pt;">
$ 349 Wichita, Kansas123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be
F-13 recognized
in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. We will apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting
period beginning July 1, 2005 at the same time as ARC. SFAS 123R
covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including options,
restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights,
and employee share purchase plans. We are still evaluating the impacts of
adopting SFAS 123R upon our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. On May 2,
2002, ARC completed the Reorganization in which each of the Limited
Partnerships was merged with a separate subsidiary of ARC (ARC and the Limited
Partnerships hereinafter collectively referred to as the ARC Partnerships).
Also as part of the Reorganization, the retail home sales, insurance and other
businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited
Liability Company (Holdings) were acquired by the Operating Partnership and
Holdings was liquidated. ARC became the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership, which then indirectly owned and operated its existing portfolio of
manufactured home communities and the Limited Partnerships portfolios of
manufactured home communities, as well as the other businesses previously
conducted by the subsidiaries of Holdings. As a result
of the Reorganization, the limited partners received cash ($113.0 million),
partnership units in the Operating Partnership paired with 1.9268 shares of
special voting shares of ARC par value $.01 per share (collectively, 2.7
million partnership units and special voting stock, hereinafter collectively
referred to as OP Units) and common units (1.6 million units). As a result of
the combination of Holdings subsidiaries with the Operating Partnership,
Holdings received shares of ARCs common stock (4.2 million shares) and
distributed them to its owners upon the liquidation of Holdings. In
connection with the Reorganization, several of our subsidiaries incurred fixed
rate mortgage debt of $310 million and floating rate mortgage debt of
$193 million and issued $75 million out of a commitment to issue a
preferred interest of $150 million. The proceeds of these borrowings were
used to repay existing indebtedness of certain subsidiaries of the ARC
Partnerships, fund the cash portion of the consideration to the limited
partners of the Limited Partnerships in the Reorganization, pay fees and
expenses related to the Reorganization and provide working capital. We have used the purchase method to account for the
combination of the businesses and assets of the Limited Partnerships and
Holdings. We have allocated the aggregate purchase price of the businesses and
assets of Holdings and the Limited Partnerships to tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values as follows (in
thousands): Purchase Purchase price, including transaction costs $ 328,551 Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed:
The Towneship at Clifton Rental and other property 538 58.4 % 407,832 Intangible lease contracts and customer relationship
value 18,917 Other operating assets and liabilities 36,033 Debt assumed (233,915 ) $ 260 Twin Oaks KS 373 73.5 % ="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">
228,867 Goodwill $ 99,684 We
allocated this goodwill to the real estate reporting unit ($85.3 million),
retail home sales and finance reporting unit ($12.1 million) and insurance
reporting unit ($2.3 million). At December 31, 2002,
258 Chisholm Creek KS 254 61.8 % we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using
capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the reporting units. As
a result, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales
business $12.1 million and the insurance business of $1.4 million.
The impairment for retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening
of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance
in our retail home sale business, the retail home sales industry, the related
finance industry and the market for retail home sales businesses. The
impairment for the insurance business arose because the retail home sales
business provides a significant portion of the insurance business revenue. We
realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003. See
Note 13 for discussion regarding 2004 impairment. We
determined the fair value of the tangible community assets (other than rental
homes discussed below) acquired in the Reorganization (which includes land,
land improvements, and buildings) by valuing the property as if it were vacant.
We then allocated the as-if-vacant value to land, land improvements and
buildings based on our determination of the relative fair values of these
assets. We
determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the
expected lease-up period for individual communities (based on vacancies in the
surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the
expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual
rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants. We measure
the aggregate value of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships as the
excess of the purchase price paid for a property over the estimated fair value
of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above. We amortize the in-place
lease value and tenant relationships for commuont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">240 The Woodlands KS We also
determined fair value for the rental manufactured homes acquired in the
Reorganization as if they were vacant. We determined the as-if-vacant fair
value of the rental homes by considering the expected lease-up period for the
home (based on lease-up history for rental homes in that community) and the
expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual
rental rates). We measured the aggregate value of the intangibles related to
rental homes, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the
purchase price paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to
market) less the fair value of the property as-if-vacant. We amortize the
market rate adjustment, in-place leases and tenant relationships over the
one-year term of the lease. We have insufficient history with customer
relationships in rental homes and there is insufficient industry operating
experience with rental homes to support an amortization period in excess of the
initial lease term. As we gain more experience with rental home tenant
renewals, we may adjust the amortization period for customer relationships in
rental homes to consider historical renewals. In accordance with the procedures
described above, we have established the following intangible assets associated
with in-place leases and tenant relationships as of the date of acquisition (in
thousands): Community customer relationships 243 76.1 % 290 Navajo Lake Estates $ 15,708 Community in place lease value 1,709 Rental customer relationships 1,288 Rental in-place lease value 45 Rental above and below market leases 167 $ 18,917 F-15 KS As a
consequence of using the purchase method to account for the Reorganization, our
results of operations and financial position include all of our accounts in all
periods but include the results of operations of the businesses formerly
conducted in the Limited Partnerships and Holdings only for periods subsequent
to the Reorganization. We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information for the year ended December 31,
2002 as if the Reorganization had occurred on January 1, 2002. The pro
forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would
have occurred if the Reorganization had been consummated on January 1,
2002 (amounts in thousands): Revenue $ 176,919 Total expenses(1) $ 235,545 Interest income $ (1,543 ) Net loss from continuing operations $ (57,083 ) 160 66.3 % 299 Glen Acres KS 136 68.4 Discontinued operations $ 186 Net loss $ (56,897 ) Net loss per unit $ (3.35 ) Weighted average units outstanding 16,973 % 270 REIT IPO
and Hometown Acquisition On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at
$19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling
stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00
per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock
were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17,
2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds
to ARC of $14.0 million. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with
its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued
23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP Units to ARC. Also in
connection with ARCs IPO, we granted 530,000 common OP Units that vested at
the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which
ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted OP Units.
In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004,
an additional 37,500 restricted OP Units were forfeited. Concurrent
with the ARC IPO, we completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of our
mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage
debt. The new mortgage debt, at the time of the ARC IPO, was comprised of
$215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.53%,
$100.7 million of 5 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of
5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt (see Note 6). Proceeds
from the ARC IPO and new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities,
repay our Rental Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued
by one of our subsidiaries. On February 18, 2004, and
subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from
Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include
26,406 F-16 homesites.
The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the
following (in thousands): Cash purchase price $ 522,131 Debt assumed in connection with acquisition 93,139 Total purchase price $ 615,270 Our purchase price allocation is (in
thousands): Land $ 89,794 Rental and other property 494,734 Inventory 9,761 Sherwood Acres KS 112 62.5 % 315 Sleepy Hollow * KS 86 48.8 % 303 Park Avenue Estates KS 811 Customer relationships 14,496 Notes receivable 5,674 Total purchase price allocation $ 615,270 We amortize
the lease intangibles acquired on a straight-line basis over the lease term
(one year) and the customer relationships acquired on a straight-line basis
over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five
years). We assumed management of the Hometown communities prior to
our completion of the Hometown acquisition pursuant to a management agreement.
We hired all Hometown employees actively employed at the Hometown communities
on January 1, 2004, with Hometown reimbursing us for the costs associated
with such employment until we completed the acquisition. On June 30,
2004 we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY,
L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The
total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was
approximately $65.5 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt,
this acquisition was funded through the issuance of new Series B, C
and D Partnership Preferred Units (PPUs), for proceeds totaling
$33.1 million. All of the D series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were
redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 4 for further discussion
of the PPUs. Our purchase price allocation is
(in thousands):
85 81.2 % 350 El Caudillo KS 67 Land $ 9,225
92.5 % 287 55,501 Inventory 803 Customer relationships 52 Other assets/liabilities, net (78 ) Total purchase price allocation $ 65,503 We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M.
acquisitions.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:13.25pt;">
Sunset 77 * KS F-17 year ended
December 31, 2003 because the results of Hometown are included in our
results for the year ended December 31, 2004 for approximately ten and one-half
months (in thousands). For the Year Ended 52 67.3 % 201 2004 2003 Revenue $ 236,114 $ 240,083 Total expenses $ 321,722 Audora KS 37 86.5 % 314 Sycamore Square * KS 35 40.0 % 204 Wichita, KansasTotal/Weighted 2,178 66.7 % $ 280,474 Interest income $ (1,676 ) $ (1,919 ) Loss from continuing operations $ (83,932 ) $ (38,472 ) Discontinued operations $ (6,326 ) $ 273 Orlando, Florida Shadow Hills $ 6,055 Net loss $ (90,258 ) $ (32,417 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (100,010 ) $ (32,417 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit $ (2.47 ) $ (1.65 ) Weighted average units outstanding 40,413 19,699 Other
Acquisitions During the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 in addition to the Hometown
and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six, three and nineteen
manufactured home communities, respectively, from unaffiliated third parties
for approximately $16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed
debt in 2004, $6.5 million in cash and $4.3 million in assumed debt
in 2003, and $52.1 million in cash and $5.9 million in assumed debt
in 2002. We accounted for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of
accounting and, accordingly, we have allocated the purchase price to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of
acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental
property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases
intangibles. We have not
presented pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day
of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our
financial position, results of operations or cash flow for these periods. F-18 The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home
community acquisitions for the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31,
2004. Date FL 664 77.4 % $ 425 Siesta Lago FL 489 96.7 % 383 Chalet North FL 403 92.8 % 377 College Park FL Portfolio Community Location Homesites Jan-02 NA Sundown Clearfield, UT
130 97.7 % 200 Feb-02 NA Forest Park Queensbury, NY 183 Feb-02 NA Birch Meadow Estates Wilton, NY 64 Feb-02 NA Park DAntoine Wilton, NY 18 Apr-02 246 Carriage Court East NA Valley Verde Las Cruces, NM 220 Apr-02 NA Arbor Lake Grinnell, IA 40 May-02 FL 128
NA Riverside West Valley City, UT 201 Jun-02 99.2 % 309 Carriage Court Central FL 118 96.6 NA Hampton Acres Desoto, TX
% 295 Wheel Estates FL 54 100.0 % 221 Orlando,
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 1,986 89.8 % $ 368 St. Louis, Missouri/Illinois 119 Jul-02 NA Southridge Estates Des Moines, IA 302 Jul-02 NA Pleasant Grove Raleigh, NC 72 Jul-02 NA Amber Village Dallas, TX 206 Jul-02 NA Village East Terrell, TX 196
Enchanted Village * IL 506 65.4 % $ 299 Mallard Lake IL 277 93.1 % 315 Country Club Manor MO 250 88.8 % 314 Siesta Manor MO 192 Jul-02 NA Americana #1 & #2 Hemet, CA
87.5 % 286 Brookshire Village 309 Sep-02 NA Connelly Village Connelly, NY 100 Sep-02 NA Cypress Shores Winter Haven, FL 204 Sep-02 NA Grand Meadows Longmont, CO 104 Dec-02 NA Ble="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:19.1pt;">
MO 202 68.8 %
Charlotte, NC 257 Dec-02
251 Castle Acres IL Berryhill Acres Charlotte, NC 244 Dec-02 NA Creekside Terrace Charlotte, NC 250 Feb-03 NA Brookshire Village St. Louis, MO 202 Sep-03 NA Philbin Estates Pocatello, ID 180 Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates I Lebanon, TN 270 Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates II Clarksville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA 100 Oaks Fultondale, AL 235 Feb-04 HTA Jonesboro 167 96.4 % 237 Rockview Heights MO 101 90.1 % 334 Oak Grove * IL 73 83.6 % 286 Vogel Manor MHC Jonesboro, GA 75 Feb-04 HTA Bermuda Palms Indio, CA 185
MO 72 91.7 Feb-04 HTA Breazeale Laramie, WY 245 Bush Ranch
117 Feb-04 HTA Broadmore Goshen, IN MO 46 69.6 % 282 Hidden Acres 370 Feb-04
MO 26 76.9 % 312 St. Louis, Missouri/IllinoisTotal/Weighted Average 1,912 81.0 % $ 290 97 HTA Butler Creek Augusta, GA 376 Feb-04 HTA Camden Point Kingsland, GA 268 Feb-04 HTA Rental Income Carnes Crossing Summerville, SC 604 Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma Feb-04 HTA Castlewood Estates Mableton, GA 334 Feb-04 HTA Casual Estates Liverpool, NY 961<" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">
Burntwood OK
Feb-04 HTA Riverdale Riverdale, GA 481 410 85.1 % $ 262 Westlake
Feb-04 HTA Columbia Heights Grand Forks, ND 302 Feb-04 OK 335 73.4 % 291 Westmoor OK 284 68.7 % 376 HTA Conway Plantation Conway, SC 299 Feb-04 HTA Crestview Stillwater, OK 238 Feb-04 Meridian Sooner HTA Country Village Jacksonville, FL 643 Feb-04 HTA Eagle Creek Tyler, TX 194 Feb-04 HTA Eagle Point Marysville, WA 230 Feb-04 HTA Falcon Farms Port Byron, IL 215 Feb-04 HTA Forest Creek Elkhart, IN 167 Feb-04 OK 203 92.1 % 273 Golden Rule OK 196 HTA Fountainvue Lafontaine, IN 80.6 % 273 Timberland OK 173 78.0 % 277 Overholser Village OK 165 120 Feb-04 HTA Foxhall Village Raleigh, NC 315 Feb-04 HTA Golden Valley Douglasville, GA 131 Feb-04 HTA Huron Estates Cheboygan, MI 111 F-19 Feb-04 HTA Indian Rocks Largo, FL
79.4 % 296 Glenview * OK 60 71.7 % 258 Misty Hollow * OK 61 62.3 % 293 Oklahoma
City, OklahomaTotal/Weighted Average Feb-04 HTA Knoll Terrace Corvallis, OR 212 Feb-04 HTA La Quinta Ridge Indio, CA 151 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Montgomery, AL 396 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Estates Davenport, IA 180 Feb-04 HTA Landmark Village Fairburn, GA 524 Feb-04 HTA Marnelle Fayetteville, GA 205 Feb-04 HTA Oak Ridge Elkhart, IN 204 Feb-04 HTA Oakwood Forest Greensboro, NC 482 Feb-04
1,887 78.5 % $ 289 Greensboro/Winston Salem, North
Carolina Pedalers Pond Lake Wales, FL
Oakwood Forest * NC 469 74.2 % $ 262 Woodlake * NC 307 64.5 % 293 214 Feb-04 HTA Pinecrest Village Shreveport, LA 446 Feb-04 HTA Pleasant Ridge Mount Pleasant, MI 305 Feb-04 HTA Presidents Park Grand Forks, ND 174 Feb-04 HTA Riverview Clackamas, OR 133 Feb-04 HTA Saddlebrook N. Charleston, SC 425 Feb-04
Autumn Forest * NC 297 49.8 % 246 Village Park<"2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> HTA Sherwood Hartford City, IN
* 134 Feb-04 HTA Southwind Village Naples, FL 337 Feb-04 HTA Springfield Farms Brookline Sta, MO 290 Feb-04 HTA Stonegate Shreveport, LA 157 Feb-04 NC 241 87.6 % HTA Terrace Heights Dubuque, IA 317 289 Gallant Estates * NC HTA Torrey Hills Flint, MI 377
84 78.6 % 234 Greensboro/Winston
Salem, North CarolinaTotal/Weighted Average HTA Twin Pines
1,398 69.5 % $ 270 Davenport/Moline/Rock
Island, Iowa/Illinois Cloverleaf IL 292 95.9 % Goshen, IN 238 Feb-04 HTA Villa Flint, MI 319 Feb-04 HTA Winter Haven Oaks Winterhaven, FL 343 Feb-04 HTA Green Park South $ 277 Silver Creek IA 272 84.2 % 239 Five Seasons Davenport IA 259 78.4 % 245 Falcon Farms IL 214 86.0 % 278 Pelham, AL 421 Feb-04 HTA Hunter Ridge Jonesboro, GA 838 Feb-04 HTA Friendly Village Lawrenceville, GA 203 Feb-04 HTA Misty Winds Corpus Christi, TX 354 Feb-04 HTA Shadow Hills Orlando, FL 670 Feb-04 HTA Smoke Creek Snellville, GA 264 Feb-04 HTA Woodlands of Kennesaw Lakewood Estates IA 180 96.1 % 295 Lakeside IA 123 76.4 % 255 Whispering Hills IL
Kennesaw, GA 273 Feb-04 HTA Sunset Vista Magna, UT 207 Feb-04 HTA Sea Pines Mobile, AL 429 Feb-04 HTA e="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">45 86.7 % 277 Davenport/Moline/Rock
Island, Iowa/Illinois 1,385 86.8 % $ 265 Inland
Empire, California Montgomery, AL 628 Feb-04 HTA The Pines Ladson, SC 204 Feb-04 HTA Shady Hills Nashville, TN 251 Feb-04 HTA Trailmont Goodlettsville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA Chisholm Creek Wichita, KS 254 Feb-04 HTA Big Country Cheyenne, WY 251 Desert Palms MHC *
Feb-04 HTA Heritage Point Montgomery, AL 264 Feb-04 HTA CA 309 89.3 % Lakeside Lithia Springs, GA 103 Feb-04 HTA Plantation Estates Douglasville, GA 138 Feb-04 HTA Green Acres Petersburg, VA
$ 370 Meridian Terrace * CA Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Davenport, IA
124 Feb-04 HTA Evergreen Village Pleasant View, UT 238 Feb-04 HTA Four Seasons Fayetteville, GA 214 Feb-04 HTA Alafia Riverfront Riverview, FL 96 Feb-04 HTA Highland Elkhart, IN 246 Feb-04 HTA Birchwood Farms Birch Run, MI 143 F-20 95.7 % 424
Feb-04 HTA Cedar Terrace * CA 200 96.0 % 426 Bermuda Palms * CA 185 98.4 % 333 La Quinta Ridge Cedar Rapids, IA 255 Feb-04 HTA Five Seasons Davenport Davenport, IA 270 Feb-04 HTA Silver Creek Davenport, IA 280 Feb-04 HTA Encantada Las Cruces, NM 354
* CA 151 98.0 % 385 Lido Estates * CA 121 Feb-04 HTA Royal Crest Los Alamos, NM 180 Feb-04 HTA Brookside Village Dallas, TX 394 Feb-04 HTA Meadow Glen Keller, TX 409 Feb-04 HTA Silver Leaf Mansfield, TX 145 98.3 % 468 Inland
Empire, CaliforniaTotal/Weighted Average 1,223 95.1 % $ 397 98 Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Mar-04 HTA Lamplighter Village Marietta, GA 431 Mar-04 HTA Shadowood Acworth, GA 506 Homesite Community Name
Mar-04 HTA Stone Mountain Stone Mountain, GA 354 Mar-04 HTA -after:avoid;text-align:center;"> Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Elkhart/Goshen, Indiana Marion Village Marion, IA 486 Mar-04 HTA
Autumn Forest Brown Summit, NC 299 Mar-04 HTA Broadmore IN 367 72.2 % $ 340 Highland Woodlake Greensboro, NC IN 246 89.4 % 263 Twin Pin:right;">308 Mar-04 HTA Arlington Lakeside Arlington, TX 233 Apr-04 HTA Pine Ridge Sarasota, FL
IN 228 96.1 % 308 Oak Ridge Apr-04 HTA Cedar Knoll Waterloo, IA 290 Apr-04 HTA Mallard Lake Pontoon Beach, IL 278 Jun-04
IN 204 97.1 % 308 Forest Creek IN NA Kopper View West Valley City, UT 61 Jun-04 NA Overpass Point Tooele, UT 167 80.8 % 459 182 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pleasant View Berwick, PA
Elkhart/Goshen,
IndianaTotal/Weighted Average 1,212 108 Jun-04
85.6 % $ 326 Charleston/North
Charleston, South Carolina Carnes Crossing Brookside Berwick, PA 171 Jun-04 D.A.M. Beaver Run Linkwood, MD 118 Jun-04 D.A.M. Carsons Chambersburg, PA 130 Jun-04 D.A.M. Chelsea Sayre, PA 85 Jun-04 D.A.M. Collingwood Horseheads, NY 101 Jun-04 D.A.M. Crestview Sayre, PA 98 Jun-04
SC 602 75.9 % $ ,248 Saddlebrook SC 425 93.2 % 275 The Pines SC D.A.M. Valley View in Danboro Danboro, PA 231 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Ephrata Ephrata, PA 149 Jun-04 D.A.M. Frieden Schuylkill Haven, PA 192 Jun-04 D.A.M. Green Acres Chambersburg, PA 24 Jun-04 D.A.M. Gregory Courts Honey Brook, PA 39 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Honey Brook Honey Brook, PA 146 Jun-04 D.A.M. Huguenot Port Jervis, NY 166 Jun-04 D.A.M. Maple Manor Taylor, PA 316 Jun-04 D.A.M. Monroe Valley Jonestown, PA 44 Jun-04 D.A.M. Moosic Heights Avoca, PA 152 Jun-04 D.A.M. Mountaintop &nbe="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 152 73.0 % 181 Charleston/North
Charleston, South Carolina 1,179 81.8 % $ 251 Southeast
Florida
Narvon, PA 39 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Haven Blossvale, NY 130 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunny Acres Somerset, PA 207 Jun-04 D.A.M. Suburban Western Hills FL 395 99.2 % $ 555 Sunshine City * FL 350 93.1 % 503 Lakeside of the Palm Beaches Greenburg, PA 202 Jun-04 D.A.M. Blue Ridge * FL 260 93.8 % Conklin, NY 69 Jun-04 D.A.M. Chambersburg I&II Chambersburg, PA 100 Jun-04 D.A.M. Hideaway Honey Brook, PA 40 Jun-04 D.A.M. Kintner Vestal, NY 55
395 Havenwood FL 120 98.3 % 478 Southeast
FloridaTotal/Weighted Average 1,125 Jun-04 D.A.M. Martins Nottingham, PA 60 Jun-04 D.A.M. Nichols Phoenixville, PA 10 Jun-04 D.A.M. Scenic View East Earl, PA 18 Jun-04 D.A.M. Shady Grove Atglen, PA 40
96.0 % $ 495 Nashville, Tennessee F-21 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Blandon Fleetwood, PA 30 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Morgantown
Countryside Village * TN 23 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Tuckerton
350 69.4 % $ 349 Weatherly Estates I * TN 270 63.3 % 294 Shady Hills 74
* TN 189 84.7 % 241 Trailmont D.A.M. Valley View in Wernersville Wernersville, PA 29 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Terrace Schuylkill Haven, PA 25 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunnyside Trooper, PA 71
* Jun-04 D.A.M. Oakwood Lake Village TN 131 89.3 % 304 Weatherly Estates II * TN 131 67.9 % 190 Nashville,
TennesseeTotal/Weighted Average Tunkhannock, PA 79 Jul-04 NA Western Mobile Estates West Valley City, UT 145 Sep-04 NA Willow Creek Estates Ogden, UT 137 As of December 31, 2004, the
Company has a total of 43.3 million Common OP Units, 5.0 million
Series A Preferred OP Units, 300,000 Series B Preferred Units and
706,000 Series C Preferred OP Units outstanding. The following table
summarizes our partner capital transactions from inception of the Company (in
thousands): Year Common Series A 1,071 Series C 72.8 % $ 291 Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, North Carolina Series D Total Initial capitalization 1998 1,038
$ 20,000 Sales of OP Units 1999 4,155 78,804 Sales of OP Units 2000 2,995 63,859 Sales of OP Units 2001 1,497 Green Spring Valley NC 322 89.1 % $ 317 33,700 Sales of OP Units 2002 1,498
Foxhall Village NC 33,760 OP Units issued in Reorganization 2002 315 84.4 % 370 Deerhurst NC 8,516
202 202,472 Subtotal 19,699 432,595 Issuance of Common OP Units in connection with ARC IPO 2004 23,572 410,724 Restricted common units issued, net of current year
amortization 2004 81.2 % 325 Stony Brook North NC 95
183 92.9 % 402 199 Pleasant Grove NC 72 70.8 % 177 Forfeiture of restricted common OP units 2004 (80 Raleigh/Durham/Chapel
Hill, North CarolinaTotal/Weighted Average 1,094 85.7 % $ 340 99 Rental Income Per Occupied ) (150 ) Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with ARC IPO 2004 5,000 119,108 Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with D.A.M.
portfolio acquisition 2004
Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Syracuse, New
York 300 Casual Estates
706 320 33,142 Redemption of Preferred OP Units NY 801 64.7 % $ 358 Pine Haven MHP * NY 130 2004 64.6 % 226 Syracuse,
New YorkTotal/Weighted Average (320 ) (8,000 ) Redemption of Common OP Units 2004 931 64.7 % $ 340 Tampa/Lakeland/Winter
Haven, Florida (8 ) (125 ) Common OP Unit distributions 2004
Winter Haven Oaks FL 200 97.5 % $ 230 Pedaler's Pond FL 213 93.4 % 306 Cypress Shores FL 203 88.7 % 273 Indian Rocks *
FL 148 87.8 % (47,085 ) Subtotal 43,278 5,000 300 706 <>
323 Alafia Riverfront * FL 96 97.9 % 334 Tampa/Lakeland/Winter Haven, FloridaTotal/Weighted
Average
940,408 Accumulated
other comprehensive income 1,208 Cumulative net losses (225,677 ) Partners capital, December 31, 2004 $ 715,939 F-22 On January 23,
2004 our partners approved a reverse split by which all of our partners
received 0.519 Common OP Unit for every Common OP Unit they previously owned.
As a result, we have restated all historical Common OP Unit data to give effect
to this reverse split. On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at
$19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling
stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00
per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock
were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17,
2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds
to ARC. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were
contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued
23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series A Preferred
OP Units to ARC. Also in
connection with ARCs IPO, we granted 530,000 Common OP Units that vested at
the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which
ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted Common OP
Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted Common OP Units were
forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted Common OP
Units were forfeited. In
addition, as of December 31, 2004 ARC has outstanding warrants to certain
ARC shareholders authorizing the purchase of up to 775,000 shares of ARC common
stock at $18.85 per share, as adjusted for dividends paid by ARC. The warrants
expire on July 23, 2010 and, if exercised, would result in issuance of 775,000
additional Common OP Units. To date, no warrants have been exercised. We repurchased a total of 8,025 Common OP Units from Common
OP Unitholders for total cash of approximately $125,000 during 2004. No
repurchases were completed in 2003 or 2002. At the ARC IPO, the Company issued 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP Units at a price of $25.00 per unit that have a liquidation
preference of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid
distributions. The holders of our Series A Preferred OP Units are
entitled to receive cash distributions at a rate of 8.25% per annum of the
$25.00 liquidation preference. The Series A Preferred OP Units have no
voting rights and no stated maturity. We may not redeem the Series A
Preferred OP Units prior to February 18, 2009. On and after February 18,
2009, we may, at our option, redeem our Series A Preferred OP Units, in
whole or from time to time in part, at a cash redemption price equal to $25.00
per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, to
and including the redemption date. Our Series A Preferred OP Units will
not be convertible into or exchangeable for any of our other properties or
securities. Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units At December 31,
2004, we had 300,000 Series B Preferred OP Units and 705,688 Series C
Preferred OP Units outstanding that were issued as part of the D.A.M. portfolio
acquisition (see Note 3). Each Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at our election, one share of ARC
common stock (which would necessitate the issuance of one Common OP Unit). The Series B
OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash
distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series B
OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance
at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series B OP Unitholders can
request redemption of their units after the 1st anniversary of
issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series B
OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or cash and a note payable,
at the Operating Partnerships option. As of December 31, 2004, we have
accrued F-23 $78,125 of the Series B OP Unit preferred distribution,
representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series B
Preferred Unitholders through that date. The Series C Preferred OP Units carry a liquidation
preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per
annum, payable quarterly. The Series C Preferred OP Units can be
redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of
the Operating Partnership. Series C Preferred OP Unitholders can request
redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of
issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series C
Preferred OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or with cash and a
note payable, at the Operating Partnerships option. Series B and C
Preferred OP Units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions.
As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series C
Preferred OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the
preferred distribution earned by Series C Preferred OP Unitholders
through that date. 860 92.8 % $ 286 Sioux City, Iowa/Nebraska On March 10,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1493 per Common OP Unit,
prorated from February 18, 2004 to March 31, 2004. We paid the total
Common OP Unit distribution of $6.5 million on April 15, 2004 to
unitholders of record on March 31, 2004. In addition, on March 10,
2004 we declared a distribution of $0.4182 on each unit of our Series A
Preferred OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to April 30, 2004.
We paid the Series A Preferred OP Units distribution of
$2.1 million on April 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on April 15,
2004. On June 14,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Units. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.6 million on July 15,
2004 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2004. In addition, on June 14,
2004 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series A Preferred OP
Unit. This distribution was paid July 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on
July 15, 2004. In addition, on July 30, 2004 we paid a $0.13 per unit
distribution, prorated from July 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004, on both
the Series B and Series C Preferred OP Units. On September 14,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on October 15,
2004 to unitholders of record on September 30, 2004. Also, on September 14,
2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series A
Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid October 29, 2004 to
unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. In addition, on September 14,
2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on October 29, 2004 to
unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. On December 10,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on January 14,
2005 to unitholders of record on December 31, 2004. Also, on December 10,
2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series A
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid January 31, 2005 to
unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004,
we had accrued $1.7 million of the Series A Preferred OP Unit
distribution, representing the portion of the distribution earned by preferred
shareholders through that date. In addition, on December 10, 2004 we
declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on January 31, 2005 to
unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. On March 10, 2005, we declared a quarterly
distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We will pay the total Common OP
Unit distm" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:11.0pt;">
Evergreen Village IA 518 74.5 % $ F-24 Series C Preferred OP Units.
This distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on
April 15, 2005. 5. Rental
and Other Property, net The following summarizes rental and
other property (in thousands): December 31, 2004 2003 Land Siouxland Estates NE $ 211,383 $ 119,779
271 86.0 % 289 Tallview Terrace IA 205 Land improvements and buildings 1,268,002 705,573 Rental homes and improvements 197,668 129,194 Furniture, equipment and vehicles 12,434 8,656 Subtotal 1,689,487 963,202 Less
accumulated depreciation (156,707 ) (99,687 ) Rental and other property, net $ 1,532,780 $ 84.9 % 286 Sioux City, Iowa/NebraskaTotal/Weighted Average 994 79.8 % $ 290 863,515 Land improvements and buildings comprise primarily
infrastructure, roads and common area amenities. The following table sets forth
certain information regarding our debt (in thousands). December 31, Des Moines, Iowa &nblign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:345.2pt;">
2004 2003 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum $ 303,903 $ 306,767 Senior fixed rate mosp; Southridge
Estates 213,333 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum 99,651 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.0%
per annum (5.40% at December 31, 2004) 150,871
IA 257 86.8 % $ 346 Country Club
Crossing IA 225 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.85%
per annum (3.97% at December 31, 2003) 174,756 BFND credit facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum
(4.12% at December 31, 2003) 89.3 %
52,414 Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through
2031, averaging 7.31% per annum 153,818 40,380 Preferred interest due 2005, 14.0% per annum 170,000 Rental home credit facility due 2010, LIBOR plus 4.7% per
annum (5.82% at December 31, 2003) 24,055 Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility, LIBOR plus 2.95%
(5.35% at December 31, 2004) 51,000 Floorplan lines of credit, ranging from prime plus 0.75%
to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 7.79% at December 31, 2004) 27,999 3,897 Other loans due 2005 1,047 1,125 $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 The fair value of debt outstanding as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million,
respectively. F-25 Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 We entered into the Senior Fixed Ra:1.0pt;"> 306 Sunrise Terrace * IA 200 73.0 % 245 Ewing Trace IA 182 99.5 % 313 Arbor Lake * Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on
February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the
Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home
communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due
2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on
a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the
mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and
property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014
contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made
prior to maturity. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on
February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the
Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home
communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due
2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05%, will amortize based on a 30-year
amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the
mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and
property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009
contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made
prior to maturity. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2006 We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006
on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and
the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property
subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44
manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable
Rate Mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of
3.00% over the one-month LIBOR rate (5.40% at December 31, 2004) and will
mature in February 2006. At our option and subject to certain conditions,
we may extend the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 for three additional
12-month periods. In connection with the second and third extensions, we would
be required to pay extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding
principal balance, respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our
interest costs in the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%,
and intend to purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will
incur an exit fee equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment
of the principal amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction
by an amount equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans
provided by the lenders to refinance the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due
2006. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established
reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance,
capital spending F-26 and property operating
expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject
to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of
payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments
made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are
subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2005 We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005
on May 2, 2002. It was an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and was
collateralized by 71 manufactured home communities. The floating rate debt bore
interest at a variable rate calculated as the one-month LIBOR plus 2.85% (3.97%
as of December 31, 2003), amortized over 30 years and would have
matured on May 2, 2005. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARCs
IPO, we repaid the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage in full and incurred
$1.9 million in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early
termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004. We entered into a $150 million credit facility on November 14,
2000, (the BFND Credit Facility). Proceeds from the BFND Credit Facility were
available for community acquisitions and anticipated capital expenditures with
advances up to 70% of the purchase price and related costs. On February 18,
2004, concurrent with ARCs IPO, we repaid the BFND Credit Facility in full and
incurred $786,000 in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early
termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004. Various Individual Fixed Rate
Mortgages We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in
connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at
the time of acquisition as follows: a) Mortgages assumed as part of
individual property purchases. These notes total approximately
$46.3 million at December 31, 2004, mature from 2006 through 2028 and
have an average effective interest rate of 7.56%. These mortgages are secured
by 14 specific manufactured home communities. b) Mortgages assumed in
conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately
$78.2 million, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average
effective interest rate of 5.12%. These mortgages are secured by 20 specific
manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties,
the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. c) Notes assumed in conjunction
with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately
$29.3 million, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual
interest rate of 7.18%. These mortgages are secured by 22 specific manufactured
home communities. We entered into the Preferred Interest on May 2, 2002.
The Preferred Interest had a preferred distribution rate of 12.5% per annum. On
October 17, 2003, we modified our Preferred Interest to increase our
borrowing limit by $25.0 million with a preferred distribution rate of
14.0% to apply to all outstanding balances beginning on the date of the first
draw of the additional loan amount. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with
ARCs IPO, we repaid the Preferred Interest obligation in full and incurred
$3.4 million in extinguishment costs, which are included as early
termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004. F-27 On December 31, 2002, ARC Housing, L.L.C., a
subsidiary of ARC RE, entered into a $27.0 million credit facility
collateralized by rental homes (the Rental Home Credit Facility). Proceeds
from the Rental Home Credit Facility were available for acquisitions of rental
homes and related capital expenditures. The Rental Home Credit Facility would
have matured on February 1, 2010, bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus
4.7% (5.82% at December 31, 2003), required level monthly principal and="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> IA 40 77.5 We entered
into the Senior Revolving Credit Facility on February 18, 2004, in
connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The
Senior Revolving Credit Facility had a total commitment of $125.0 million,
and an initial term of three years. The facility was an obligation of our
Operating Partnership and was secured by 40 communities owned by a real
property subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, our rental homes, and certain
other ass.2pt;">
% 240 Des Moines, IowaTotal/Weighted Average In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit
Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is
an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by
the same 40 communities that previously secured the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARCs
IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by
borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flow of the
communities securing the loan. The Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears
interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004)
and has a term of one year. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing
of the facility and will pay origination fees of 0.5% with each advance. The
facility contains no significant financial covenants. We entered
into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility on February 18,
2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown
acquisition. The Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility has a
total commitment of $225.0 million and a term of four years. This facility
is an obligation of various subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, and
borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing sales
contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing
base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility.
The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00%
over the one-month LIBOR. There were no borrowings outstanding under this
facility as of December 31, 2004. This facility includes customary
affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth
and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial
covenants of the debt facility as of December 31, 2004. Upon the initial
drawing under this facility, we will pay a commitment fee of 1.00% on the
committed amount and additional annual commitment fees payable on each
anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a
number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening
guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our
communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section
home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not
exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the sales contract. F-28 The availability of advances under the retail home sales
and consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are
beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on
these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the
absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities
or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender
determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be
insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving
effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that
we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment
this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio (see Note 19). In August 2004, we amended our floorplan lines of
credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million, secured by
manufactured homes in inventory. The amended lines of credit mature in September 2007.
Under the amended lines of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the cost of
manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the
remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments
of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured
home. Advances under the amended lines of credit will bear interest ranging
from the prime rate plus 75bp to the prime rate plus 4.00% (5.50% to 8.75% at December 31,
2004), based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly
curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days
following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be
between 3.00% and 5.00% of the homes original invoice amount depending on the
type of home and the number of months since the homes purchase. The amended
lines of credit require the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum
tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth
ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million.
We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the lines of credit as of December 31,
2004. The lines of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an
unused line fee of .25% per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%,
based on the termination date. The aggregate amount of annual
principal maturities for all notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2004
is as follows (in thousands): Fixed Rate Debt Variable Rate Debt Total 2005 $
904 86.5 % $ 305 Flint, Michigan Torrey Hills MI 377 80.1 % $ 376 Villa 11,957 $ 78,999 MI 319 60.5
$ 90,956 2006 22,487 % 355 Birchwood Farms 150,871 173,358 2007 10,790
MI 142 88.0 % 317 10,790 2008 61,685 Flint, MichiganTotal/Weighted 838 74.0 % 61,685 2009 $ 358 Corpus Christi, Texas 113,456 113,456 Thereafter 551,377 551,377 $ 771,752 $ 229,870 $ 1,001,622 F-29 The following reflects the
calculation of loss per unit on a basic and diluted basis (in thousands, except
per unit information): Years ending December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Loss per unit from continuing
operations: Loss from
continuing operations $ (84,913 ) $ (43,267 ) $ (48,109 )
Misty Winds (9,752 ) Net loss
from continuing operations $ (94,665 ) $ (43,267
TX 338 90.5 %) $ (48,109 ) Loss per
unit from continuing operations $ (2.34 ) $ $ 301 Seascape * TX
(2.20 ) $ (2.94 ) 257 60.3 % 321 Seamist * TX 160 68.8 % 393 Corpus Christi, TexasTotal/Weighted
Average 755 75.6 % $ 324 100 Rental Income
Income
(loss) per unit from discontinued operations: Income
from discontinued operations $ 1,915 $ 31 $ 1,040 Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations (8,549 ) 3,333 Net income
(loss) from discontinued operations $ (6,634 ) $ 3,364 $ 1,040 Income
(loss) per unit from discontinued operations $ (0.17 ) $ 0.17 $ 0.06 Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders: Net loss
to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders
$ (2.51 ) $ (2.03 Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite ) $ (2.88 ) Weighted
average unit information: Total
units outstanding 40,413 19,699 16,353 For the year ended December 31, 2004 we have excluded
0.9 million common units related to PPUs and restricted common units from the
loss per unit calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature. 8. Property Operations
Expense During the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred property operations
expenses as follows (in thousands): For the Year Ended 2004 2003 2002 Utilities and telephone $ 27,128 $ 16,911 $ 13,849 Salaries and benefits 21,224 11,704 8,607 Repairs and maintenance 13,264 6,837 5,615 Insurance 3,870 2,269 1,679 Bad debt expense 3,745 2,394 1,464 Advertising 1,099 904 553 Other operating expenses 4,820 3,276 1,574 $ 75,150 $ 44,295 $ 33,341 F-30 9. Retail Home Sales,
Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expenses During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred retail home sales, finance, insurance and
other operations expenses as follows (in thousands): For the Year Ended Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Pueblo, Colorado Meadowbrook * CO 387 63.0 % $ 301 Sunset Country 2004 2003 2002 Utilities and telephone $ 79 $ 320 $ 308 Salaries and benefits 2,310 4,469 4,991 Repairs and maintenance 354 801 268 Insurance 187 CO 203 179 257 Bad debt expense 188 95 20
70.0 % 343 Oasis Advertising 3,632 433 509 Other operating expenses 1,448 1,085 2,229 $ 8,198 $ 7,382 $ 8,582 10. General and
Administrative Expense During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred general and administrative expenses as follows
(in thousands): CO 161 87.0 % For the Year Ended 2004 333 Pueblo, ColoradoTotal/Weighted Average 2003 2002 Salaries and benefits(b) $ 21,087 $ 9,274 $ 7,148 Travel 2,140 1,712 1,276 Professional services 751 70.0 % $ 321 Southern New York 2,580 2,205 693 Insurance 1,012 384 788 Rent(a) 379 1,715 444 Management fees(c) 1,007 Other administrative expenses 2,163 1,565 1,731 $ 29,361 $ 16,855 New Twin Lakes NY 256 99.6 % $ 491 Huguenot Estates NY 166 99.4 % 335 Spring Valley
Village NY 135 98.5 % 645 $ 13,087 (a) Includes
approximately $864,000 of one time expenses related to vacating unused
corporate office space for the year ended December 31, 2003. (b) Includes
approximately $10.1 million of one time expenses related to Common OP Units
issued to employees in connection with ARCS IPO. (c) Represents
fees paid to an affiliate prior to the Reorganiont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Connelly Terrace NY In September 2003,
we sold our Sunrise Mesa Community located in Apache Junction, Arizona for
$15.0 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million after giving effect
to net assets sold of $11.5 million and closing costs of $121,000. In
connection with the sale, we repaid $10.3 million of our Senior Variable
Rate Mortgage due 2005 related to this community. In July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction
agreement to sell twelve communities, comprising 2,933 homesites,
geographically located where the company does not have market concentration.
The auction was held in September 2004. In addition to the twelve
communities sold, as part of the auction, the company also contracted to sell
two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of its
communities in Colorado. All of these sales, except one, closed during the
fourth quarter of 2004. The remaining community continues to be held for sale
and classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 based on
the companys intent to sell this community during 2005. F-31 In
September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden
Point and Butler Creek communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total
sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales also closed during
the fourth quarter of 2004. In
October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell
twelve communitiesight;">100 100.0 % 389 Washingtonville
Manor NY 82 100.0 % 560 In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, each of the communities
sold during 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of December 31,
2004 and 2003. We have included $54.1 million and $44.4 million of
net assets related to these communities as assets held for sale in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have also included
$29.5 million and $17.0 million of obligations related to these
communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying
balance sheets. In addition, we have recast the operations of each of these
communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and
recorded a loss of $8.5 million related to the sale of the discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 in connection with these
sales. The following table summarizes combined balance sheet and income
statement information for the discontinued operations noted above (in
thousands): December 31,
Southern New YorkTotal/Weighted Average 2004 2003 Assets 739 Rental and other property, net $ 52,848 $ 43,533 Tenant, notes and other receivables, net 309 99.5 % $ 478 Cedar Rapids, Iowa
158 Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net Marion Village 593 640 Prepaid expenses and other assets 373 31 IA 437 $ 54,123 $ 44,362 Liabilities
80.3 % $ 252 Cedar Terrace Notes payable and preferred interest $ 28,951 $ 16,179 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 262 312 Tenant deposits and other liabilities 303 484 $ IA 234 81.6 % 250 Cedar Rapids, IowaTotal/Weighted Average 671 80.8 % $ 252 Philadelphia/Wilmington/Atlantic City,
PA-NJ-DE-MD
29,516 $ 16,975 For the Year Valley ViewDanboro 2004 2003 2002 Statement of Operations Revenue $ 13,166 $ 7,278 $ 6,625 Operating expenses 11,251 7,247 5,585 Income from discontinued operations $ 1,915 $ 31 $ 1,040 F-32 Retail Home Sales Asset Impairment Expense Prior to
2003, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of
manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail
dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the
industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of
manufactured homes, in late 2002 we began redirecting our retail home sales
subsidiarys sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an
in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities.
During March 2003 we ceased operations at one of our stand-alone retail
dealership locations and during June 2003 we sold two of our retail
locations recording minor charges to write down fixed assets to fair value. As of July 1, 2003 we operated the remaining 16
separate, stand-alone dealership retail locations in five states. During the
six months ended December 31, 2003 we substantially completed the
redirection of our retail home sales subsidiarys sales efforts away from a
retail dealership presence by selling twelve of our retail dealerships, ceasing
operations in the remaining four retail dealerships and focusing entirely on
in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. In
accordance with the terms we have with the buyers of the retail dealerships, we
will continue to obtain certain benefits they receive from their inventory
purchases and we expect they will continue to refer new residents to our
communities. With respect to five of the twelve stand-alone retail dealerships
we sold, we will continue to hold and finance inventory at their retail
dealership. With respect to the four retail dealerships we closed, we have
relocated inventory to nearby manufactured home communities we own. In
connection with these activities, we recorded a charge of $1.4 million in
the third quarter of 2003 to write off fixed assets net of sales proceeds and
to record the cost of remaining lease obligations at the retail dealerships we
closed in the third quarter. Real Estate Asset Impairment In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate
long-lived assets based on estimated future undiscounted net cash flows
whenever significant events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the
carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. If that evaluation
indicates that impairment has occurred, a charge is recognized to the extent
the carrying amount exceeds the discounted cash flows or fair value of the
asset, whichever is more readily determinable. At December 31, 2004, we evaluated the carrying amount
of certain real estate assets for potential impairment and determined
write-downs using recent appraisals and capitalization rates to estimate the
long-lived assets undiscounted future cash flows. As a result of these
valuations, we recorded an impairment charge to older vacant mobile homes in
our rental home portfolio and to three mobile home communities of
$3.0 million and $500,000, respectively. PA 230 100.0 % $ 362 Valley ViewHoney Brook PA As
discussed in Note 2, in connection with our Reorganization, we allocated
goodwill of $12.1 million and $2.3 million to the retail home sales
and finance reporting unit and insurance reporting unit, respectively. At December 31,
2002, we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using estimated market
values, capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value each reporting
unit. As a result of this valuation, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in
the retail home sales business of $12.1 million and in the insurance
business of $1.4 million. The impairment for the retail home sales
business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the
Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sales
business, the retail home sales industry, the related finance industry and the
market for retail home sales businesses. The impairment for the insurance
business arose because the retail home F-33 sales business provides a significant portion of the
insurance business revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31,
2003. At December 31, 2004, we evaluated our remaining
goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of
earnings to value the real estate and insurance reporting units. As a result of
these valuations, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the insurance
business of $863,000. The impairment for the insurance business was necessary
due to the negative growth projections for the business product. The Company provides to its employees a qualified
retirement savings plan (Plan) designed to qualify under Section 401 of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis
subject to certain maximum amounts. The Plan does not provide for matching
contributions to be made by the Company to employee accounts. 15. Commitments
and Contingencies We lease office space and various
pieces of office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases
have expiration dates beginning in 2005 through July 2009. Minimum future
lease and sublease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2004
are as follows (in thousands): 2005 $ 748 2006 101 2007 104 2008 48 2009 16 Total $ 1,017 In December 2003,
we recorded a one time charge of $864,000 for vacating unused office space. In the
normal course of business, from time to time we are involved in legal actions relating
to the ownership and operations of our properties. In our opinion, the
liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions, will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. In the
normal course of business, from time to time we incur environmental obligations
relating to the ownership and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the
liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such environmental
obligations, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. During August and September 2004, our
manufactured home communities located in the southeastern United States were
impacted by hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Our communities
sustained aggregate estimated damages of approximately $1.6 million
consisting primarily of fallen trees and branches, roof and water damage to
clubhouses and buildings, damage to company-owned manufactured homes, and
debris removal. The company has adequate property and business interruption
insurance coverage. The impact of the hurricanes, net of insurance proceeds, on
the companys 2004 results of operations was $453,000. F-34 16. Related
Party Transactions One of our
subsidiaries provides accounting services to six communities that are
controlled by our Chief Executive Officer under two separate year to year asset
management agreements for which we received $27,000 $29,000 and $28,000 in
compensation in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Also, during 2004, 2003 and
2002 we billed these same companies controlled by our Chief Executive Officer
$105,000, $67,000 and $30,000 for property management expenses in accordance
with those agreements. In addition, we lease an airplane hangar from a company
controlled by our Chief Executive Officer for which we paid $53,000, $53,000
and $52,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and
2003, companies owned by our Chief Executive Officer owed to us approximately
$68,000 and $4,000, respectively. During
2002, we purchased ten mobile homes on behalf of one of these affiliates in its
rental unit acquisition operations. As a result, at December 31, 2002 the
affiliate owed $206,000 related to these purchases. During
2002, an officer borrowed $100,000 from a subsidiary in exchange for a note.
The note bore interest at 4.75%, required monthly interest payments and matured
on June 30, 2005. The note was repaid in full during 2004. Prior to
the Reorganization, a subsidiary of the company reimbursed certain related
parties for specific and allocated expenses of $2.7 million during 2002.
These expenses included salaries and benefits, rent and travel and are included
in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The related party
calculated the allocated costs monthly based on the proportion of the
subsidiarys total assets to the total assets under the related partys
control. Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary purchased
manufactured homes from a related party amounting to $1.5 million in 2002.
The homes were purchased at a price that approximated the related partys cost
and included them in manufactured homes and improvements. 17. Quarterly Financial
Information (Unaudited) Quarter ended Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30
145 87.6 % 295 Dec 31 For the quarters ended 2004: Total
revenue $ Sunnyside PA 42,981 $ 55,106 $ 60,088 $ 64,482 71 97.2 % 409 Martin'S
Total
expenses $ 80,539 $ 60,898 $ 73,995 PA 60
$ 93,754 Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (38,032 ) $ (7,547 ) $ (18,227 ) $ (37,493 ) Loss per
unit(a) $ (1.20 ) 100.0 % 303 Hideaway * PA 40 82.5 % 306 Shady Grove
$ (0.17 ) $ (0.42 * PA 40 107.5 % 297 Gregory Courts PA 39 97.4 % 349 Mountaintop ) $ (0.87 ) For the quarters ended 2003: Total
revenue $ 41,390 $ 42,572 $ 41,747 $ 37,486 Total
expenses $ 51,704 $ 52,663 $ 53,316 PA 39 94.9 % $ 50,218 Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (9,741 ) $ (9,894 315 Valley ViewMorgantown * PA 23 87.0 % 279 Scenic View * PA 20 85.0 % 362 Nichols * PA 10 100.0 % 348 Philadelphia/Wilmington/ 717 95.4 % $ 337 Manhattan, Kansas ) $ (7,882 ) $ (12,386 ) Loss per unit(a) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.50 ) $ (0.40 ) $ (0.63 ) (a) Quarterly
loss per unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and
to changes in the number of common partnership units outstanding.
Colonial Gardens We operate in three business
segments which are based on the nature of business in each segmentreal estate,
retail home sales and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment
information is shown below (in thousands). December 31,
KS
2004 2003 99.7 % $ 276 Riverchase KS 159 97.5 % 291
2002 Total revenue Real
estate $ 206,690 $ 139,402 $ 102,321 Retail
home sales 15,248 Blue Valley KS 147 22,027 32,795 Finance
and insurance 719 1,766 1,378 Corporate
and other 97.3 % 321 Manhattan, KansasTotal/Weighted Average $ 222,657 $ 163,195 $ 136,494 648 98.6 % $ 289 Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and
real estate taxes Real
estate $ 91,756 $ 55,318 $ 39,991 Retail
home sales 24,931 23,799 32,565 Finance
and insurance 1,357 695 101 1,174 Corporate
and other 192 469 652 $ 118,236 $ 80,281 $ Rental Income 74,382 Net segment income(a) Real
estate $ 114,934 $ 84,084 $ 62,330 Retail
hom;">
Per Occupied Number of e sales (9,683 ) (1,772 ) 230 Finance
and insurance (638 ) Occupancy Homesite Community Name
1,071 204 Corporate
and other (192 ) (469 ) (652 ) $ 104,421 $ 82,914 $ 62,112 Property
management expense Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Birmingham, Alabama $ 7,127 $ 5,527 $ 4,105 Green Park South * AL 412 97.3 % General
and administrative expense $ 29,361 $ 16,855 $ 13,087 Interest expense Real
estate $ 52,815 $ 35,283 $ 2,138 Retail
home sales 269 100 Oaks * AL 223 70.0 456 477
% 267 Birmingham, AlabamaTotal/Weighted
Average 635 87.7 % $ 268 Finance
and insurance 195 Corporate
and other 3,426 21,626 41,666 $ 56,892 $ 57,386 $ 43,804 Amortization expense $ 12,400 $ 6,961 Tyler, Texas $ 5,723 Depreciation expense: Real estate $ 59,391 $ 38,482 $ 30,904 Retail home sales 92 298 Shiloh Pines TX 314 Finance and insurance 7 9 Corporate and other 124 73.9 % $ 335 717 431 $ 59,614 $ 39,506 $ 31,335 Eagle Creek TX 177 Initial public offering costs $ 4,417 $ $ 88.7 % 279 Rose Country
Estates
Early termination of debt $ 16,685 $ $ Real estate and retail home asset impairment $ 3,591 $ 1,385 $ TX 105 74.3 Goodwill impairment $ 863 $
% 363 Tyler, TexasTotal/Weighted Average $ 13,557 F-36 Interest income $ (1,616 ) $ (1,439 ) $ (1,390 ) Net loss before discontinued operations $ (84,913 596 78.4 % $ 321 Stillwater, Oklahoma Crestview * OK
) $ (43,267 ) $ (48,109 ) Income from discontinued operations $ 1,915 $ 31 $ 1,040 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations $ (8,549 ) $ 3,333 $ Preferred unit distributions $ (9,752 ) 237 60.3 % $ 276 Eastern Villa * OK 125 86.4 % 257 Countryside * OK $ $ Net loss $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Identifiable assets: Real
estate $ 1,738,226 $ 1,108,967 $ 1,104,228 Retail
home sales 30,053 4,043 8,867 Finance
and insurance 735 118 69.5 % 300 Oakridge /
Stonegate * OK 984 1,113 Corporate
and other 44,218 12,075 22,529 $ 1,813,232 $ 1,126,069 $ 1,136,737 Notes payable and preferred interest 108 75.0 % 303 Stillwater, OklahomaTotal/Weighted
Average 588 70.4 % $ 282 Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana Pinecrest Village * LA 427 75.4 Real
estate $ 972,059 $ 768,373 $ 726,201 Retail
home sales 28,516 3,896 9,421 Finance
and insurance Corporate
and other 1,047 1,125 1,197 $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 $ 736,819 Capital expenditures Real
estate $
% $ 198 Stonegate * LA 157 $ 46,683 $ 97.5 % 137,209 Retail
home sales 4 259 Finance
and insurance 4 44 4 Corporate
and other 419 282 1 $ 644,537 $ 47,013 $ 137,473 240 Shreveport/Bossier City, LouisianaTotal/Weighted
Average
(a) Net
segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations,
real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales,
finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the
performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property
management, general and administrative, IPO costs, early termination of debt
costs, impairment charges, depreciation, amortization, interest and impairment
of fixed assets. In March 2005, the Company
secured an additional $100.0 million in financing commitments, consisting
of an unsecured $25.8 million trust preferred security, and a
$75.0 million lease receivables facility secured by substantially all of
the Companys rental homes and the related leases. The $25.8 million trust
preferred security was borrowed on March 15, 2005, matures in
30 years, and bears interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The lease
receivables facility commitment is for $75.0 million, decreasing
$3.0 million quarterly through March 31, 2007. The facility will bear
interest at the 1-month LIBOR plus 7.0%, decreasing to the 1-month
LIBOR plus 3.25% if certain conditions are met. The facility will mature in March 2007.
The closing of the lease receivable facility will reduce the combined borrowing
capacity under the consumer finance facility to $200.0 million and
eliminate $25.0 million of previous chattel financing. The lease
receivables facility is subject to customary closing conditions and
documentation. There can be no assurance that we will close the facility and
fund. 584 F-37 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP June 30, December 31, Assets Rental
and other property, net $ 1,587,040 $ 1,532,780 Assets held
for sale 3,368 % $ 212 Las Cruces, New Mexico 54,123 Cash and
cash equivalents 19,616 39,802 Tenant
notes and other receivables, net 32,826
Encantada * NM 354 83.9 % $ 331 Valley Verde avoid;"> 19,029 Inventory 307 11,230 Loan
origination costs, net 14,510 14,403 Loan
reserves 35,453 31,019 Goodwill 85,264 * NM 202 85.1 % 314 85,264 Lease
intangibles and customer relationships, net 16,087 19,106 Las Cruces, New MexicoTotal/Weighted
Average 556 84.4 % $ 325
Prepaid
expenses and other assets 10,315 6,476 Total
assets $ 1,804,786 $ 1,813,232 Liabilities and Partners
Capital Notes
payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner at June 30, 2005) $ 1,089,004 $ 1,001,622
Liabilities
related to assets held for sale 2,656 29,516 Accounts
payable and accrued expenses 31,273 Oak Park Village
37,877 Dividends
payable 10,084 15,505 Tenant
deposits and other liabilities 15,109 FL 12,773 Total
liabilities 1,148,126 1,097,293 Commitments and contingencies Partners capital Preferred
OP units 144,250 144,250 Common OP units: General partner 486,112 539,382 Limited partners 26,298 32,307 Total
partners capital 656,660 715,939 Total liabilities and partners capital $ 1,804,786 $ 1,813,232 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-38 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 2005 2004 2005 2004 Revenue
344 91.6 % $ 251 Whitney FL 206 Rental income $ 51,366 $ 47,884 $ 102,224 $ 86,210 Sales of manufactured homes 18,288
97.1 % 248 Gainesville, FloridaTotal/Weighted
Average 26,278 2,789 Utility and other income 5,835 5,114 11,481 9,097 550 Net consumer finance interest income (expense) 155 32 205 (40 93.6 % $ 250 Huntsville, Alabama Total revenue 75,644 55,112 140,188 98,056 Expenses Property operations 20,042 Merrimac Manor 17,626 40,363 30,234 Real estate taxes 4,407
* AL 172 8,698 7,390 Cost of manufactured homes sold 16,190 1,809 24,405 2,365 26.7 % $ 383 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 4,112 1,498 7,317 2,079 Green Cove * AL 164 82.9 % 177 Cedar Creek Property management 2,494 1,600 4,759 3,054 General and administrative 6,259 4,304 11,618 19,099
* AL 132 Initial public offering related costs 4,417 Early termination of debt 13,427 Depreciation and amortization 22,224 17,242 42,255 32,152 Interest expense 16,544 12,729 31,817 27,209 Total expenses 92,272 60,888 171,232 141,426 Interest income (277 ) 60.6 % 229 Rambling Oaks * AL 80 85.0 % 222 (450 ) (660 ) (792 ) Loss from continuing operations (16,351
Huntsville, AlabamaTotal/Weighted
Average 548 (5,326 ) (30,384 ) (42,578 ) Income from discontinued operations 72 343 1,000 795 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations 52 (678 ) Net loss (16,227 ) (4,983 ) (30,062 )
60.2 % $ 225 102 ) Preferred unit distributions (2,971 ) (2,578 ) (5,942 ) (3,810 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (19,198 ) $ (7,561 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders General Partner $ (18,193 ) $ (7,126 ) $ (34,065 ) $
Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for
Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 (42,095 ) Limited Partners (1,005 ) (435 ) (1,939 ) (3,498 ) $ (19,198 ) $ (7,561 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations $ (0.45 ) $ (0.18 Per Month Scranton/Wilkes/BarreHazleton, Pennsylvania
) $ (0.84 ) $ (1.24 ) Income per common OP unit from discontinued operations 0.01 0.01 0.02 Net loss per common OP unit $ (0.45 ) $ (0.17 ) $ (0.83 ) $ (1.22 ) Weighted
average of units outstanding Maple Manor PA 313 87.9 % $ 229 Moosic Heights PA 152 78.9 % 238 Oakwood Lake Village PA 43,260 43,269 43,262 37,531 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-39 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Six Months Ended
79 91.1 % 238 Scranton/Wilkes/Barre/ 2005 2004 Cash flow
from operating activities Net loss attributable to Partners $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 42,255 32,152 OP unit grant compensation expense 326 10,144 Preferred unit distributions declared 5,156 3,810 Partnership preferred unit distributions declared 786 Non-cash ARC IPO related costs 389 Early termination of debt 7,100 544 85.8 % $ 233 Pocatello,
Idaho Depreciation included in income from discontinued
operations 5 1,859 Loss on sale of discontinued operations 678 Gain on sale of manufactured homes (1,873 ) Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions (10,340 ) 9,110 Net cash provided by operating activities 989 18,971 Cash flow
from investing activities Acquisition of Hometown communities (507,136 ) Acquisition of D.A.M. and other communities (14,754 ) Purchases of manufactured homes
(68,300 ) (44,856 ) Philbin Estates
Proceeds from community sales 48,721 Proceeds from manufactured home sales 13,014 Community improvements and equipment purchases (32,605 * ID 111 79.3 %
) (10,068 ) Net cash used in investing activities (39,170 ) (576,814 ) $ 290 Cowboy * Cash flow from REIT IPO Common stock offering ID 174 79.3 % 371 Belaire * ID 168 81.0 % 261 Pocatello, IdahoTotal/Weighted
Average
437,790 Preferred stock offering 125,000 Common stock offering expenses (36,813 ) Preferred stock offering expenses (5,593 ) Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions Debt issued in the financing transactions 500,000 Debt paid in the financing transactions (439,048 ) Payment of loan origination costs (8,122 ) Release of restricted cash 453 79.9 % $ 310 Gillette,
Wyoming 12,278 Release of loan reserves 19,089 New loan reserves (14,247 ) Proceeds from issuance of debt (including $25.0 million
from parent) 155,483 5,000 Repayment of debt (94,352 ) (5,690 ) Payment of OP unit dividends (27,045 ) (6,474 ) Payment of preferred dividends (5,156 ) (2,091 ) Payment of partnership preferred distributions (786 ) Repurchase of OP units (1,836 ) Restricted cash 456 Loan reserves Eastview WY 210 81.9 % $ 372 Westview WY 130 83.1 % 290 Highview ) (992 ) Loan origination costs (3,879 ) (1,589 )
WY 94 17,995 578,954 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (20,186 ) 92.6 % 21,111 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 39,802
283 Park Plaza 26,631 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 19,616 $
47,742 Non-cash
financing and investing transactions: Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions $ $ 122,863 Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions $ $ 33,142 Notes receivable for manufactured home sales $ 11,402 $ Supplemental
cash flow information: Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 33,931 $ 28,243 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-40 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP 1. Business, Basis of
Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Affordable
Residential Communities LP (the Partnership, Operating Partnership or OP)
is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning
and operation of primarily all-age manufactured home communities, the retail
sale and financing of manufactured homes, the rental of manufactured homes and
other related businesses including acting as agent in the sale of homeowners
insurance and related products, all exclusively to residents and prospective
residents of our communities. We were organized in July 1998 and operate
primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable
Residential Communities Inc. (ARC, General Partner, or REIT). On February 18,
2004, ARC completed an initial public offering (IPO) of approximately
22.3 million shares of its common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding
approximately 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and
5.0 million shares of its preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The
net proceeds to ARC from its IPO of common stock and preferred stock were
$517.5 million before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592
shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. All
of the proceeds from the IPO were contributed by ARC to the Partnership in
exchange for 23.1 million Common OP units and 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP units. In conjunction with the IPO, ARC also completed a financing
transaction consisting of $500.0 million of new mortgage debt and the
repayment of certain existing indebtedness (see Note 2). Concurrent
with ARCs IPO and the financing transaction noted above, we acquired 90
manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (Hometown). The
90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and totaled 26,406 homesites.
The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was
approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $93.1 million. See Note 2 for a discussion of the Companys
significant 2004 acquisitions. As of June 30,
2005, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of one community classified as
discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 62,942 homesites (net
of 126 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states with
occupancy of 84.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, with
11.5% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.9% of our total
homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front
Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas
City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas/Missouri with 3.9% of our total homesites. We also
conduct a retail home sales business. ARCs common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol ARC. ARCs Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ARC-PA. ARC
has no public trading history prior to February 12, 2004. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of F-41 assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts. The interim
consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments that
are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of the Partnership, and all such adjustments are of a normal and
recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period ended June 30,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our December 31, 2004 financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include
all of our accounts, which include the results of operations of the
manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the
date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant interentity balances
and transactions. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Rental and Other Property We carry
rental prope;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">WY 78 93.6 % Depreciation is computed primarily
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are
as follows: Asset Class Estimated Useful Manufactured home communities and improvements 10 to 30 Buildings 10 to 20 301 Gillette, WyomingTotal/Weighted 512 85.9 % Rental homes 3 Furniture and other equipment 5 Computer software and hardware 3 We evaluate
the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the net book value
of the asset is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental
property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected
net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental properidth="5" valign="bottom" style="border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.0pt;">
$ 322 Casper,
Wyoming Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our estimate of
the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years.
Homes in our rental home portfolio will now be depreciated over 3 years of
service to an estimated salvage value of 70%. This change was made to align the
depreciable lives of our rental homes to our intent to sell homes from our
rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the costs of repairs
and maintenance. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on our
financial positions, results of operations or cash flows. Hidden Hills WY 125 96.8 % $ 327 Terrace WY Revenue Recognition We
recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from
residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are
generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident
and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home
renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual
agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and
recognize it in income when earned. On lease with option to purchase contracts,
we defer recognition of all down-payments, supplemental lease payments and
sales commissions until the point of sale, which generally is at the end of the
lease term. We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we
receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title,
possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no
further obligations to perform significant additional activities. OP Unit Grants We have
included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2004, representing the value of 530,000
common OP units that were granted on February 18, 2004 under our 2003
equity incentive plan and vested on the date of grant. We valued the units at
$19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO (see
Note 2). In addition, during 2004, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP
units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted
units were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted
OP units were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their issuance. During the six months ended June 30,
2005, 3,000 of these units vested. In April 2005, the ARC board of
directors approved an award of 80,000 common OP units to Scott D. Jackson, ARCs
Chief Executive Officer, under the Companys 2003 equity incentive plan. The
units granted will vest over three years with 20,000 units vesting immediately
and 20,000 units vesting on each of the anniversary dates until April 29,
2008. Vesting is subject to Mr. Jacksons continued employment with the
Company and may be accelerated in the event of death, a change in control, or
termination other than for cause. Vested units may not be sold by Mr. Jackson
until the first anniversary date of vesting without the prior written consent
of the Compensation Committee. All units, vested and unvested, are entitled to
receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the 72,000
outstanding restricted common OP units as of June 30, 2005 as unearned
compensation (a component of partners capital) on the balance sheet and are
amortizing the balance ratably over the vesting period. We recorded
compensation expense related to restricted common OP units of $312,000 and
$326,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005,
respectively, as compared to $90,000 and $135,000 during the same periods in
2004. Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization We capitalize interest costs (using our average cost of
borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on
development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities
through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67,
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental
Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived
assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities
in our communities, manufactured homes and, in the case of the communities
acquired, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making
improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized
interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to
$1.2 million and $1.8 million capitalized during the same periods in
2004. F-43 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive
Loss Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(a component of partners capital) as of June 30, 2005 represent
unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap, which qualifies as a cash flow
hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Including
these unrecognized gains or losses, our comprehensive loss for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 was $18.5 million and
$34.1 million, respectively, compared with a comprehensive loss of
$5.3 million and $40.8 million during the same periods in 2004. Reclassifications Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to
conform to the current year presentation. New Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to
share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on
the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will be
required to apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning January 1,
2006. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation
arrangements, including options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We do not
expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to have a material impact upon our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows. REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its IPO of approximately 22.3&nbst size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 112 97.3 % 272 Green Valley Village On February 18, 2004 and
subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from
Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include
26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired
consisted of the following (in thousands): Cash purchase price WY 105 97.1 % 375 Plainview $ 522,131 Debt assumed in connection with the acquisition 93,139 Total
purchase price $ 615,270 F-44 Our purchase price allocation is as
follows (in thousands):
WY 70 97.1 Land $ 90,296 Rental and other property 494,429 Manufactured homes 9,761 Lease intangibles % 340 Terrace II WY 70 811 Customer relationships 14,496 Notes receivable 5,477 $ 615,270 D.A.M.
Portfolio Acquisition On June 30,
2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY,
L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The
total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was
approximately $65.5 million, including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt,
this acquisition was funded through the issuance of Series B, C and D
Partnership Preferred Units (PPUs), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million.
All of the D series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on
July 6, 2004. See Note 3 for further discussion of the PPUs. Our purchase price allocation is as
follows (in thousands): 95.7 %
Land $ 9,225 Rental and other property 55,501 Manufactured homes 803 Customer relationships 52 Other assets/liabilities, net (78 ) Total purchase price allocation $ 65,503 We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M.
acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The pro forma data is not
necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we
had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except per
share information): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 ont-size:9.5pt;">357 Casper, WyomingTotal/Weighted 482 96.9 % $ 331 Grand
Forks, North Dakota Columbia Heights
Actual Pro forma Actual ND Pro forma Revenue $ 75,644 $ 57,676 $ 140,188 $ 111,513 Total expenses 92,272 302 94.7 % $ 322 President's Park 63,198 171,232 153,962 Interest income (277 ) (450 ) ND 163 (660 ) (852 ) Loss from
continuing operations (16,351 ) (5,072 ) (30,384 ) (41,597 ) Income from discontinued operations 124 343 322 88.3 % 281 Grand Forks, North DakotaTotal/Weighted
Average 465 9 1,100 Net loss $ (16,227 ) $ (4,729 ) $ (30,062 ) $ (40,497 ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (19,198 ) $ (7,307 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (44,307
% $ 308 Cheyenne,
Wyoming ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders per unit $ (0.44 Big Country WY 248 82.3 % $ 242 Cimmaron Village ) $ (0.17 ) $ (0.83 ) $ (1.18 ) Weighted average units outstanding 43,260 43,269 43,262 37,531 F-45 Other
Acquisitions During the
period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, in addition to
the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six manufactured
home communities from unaffiliated third parties for approximately
$16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed debt. We accounted
for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, have allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of their
acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental
property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases
intangibles. No acquisitions were made in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005. We have not presented pro forma results of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if these other acquisitions
were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other
acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows for those periods. F-46 The table below summarizes all of
our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period January 1,
2004 through June 30, 2005: Date Portfolio Community Location WY 152
Homesites Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates I Lebanon, TN 270 92.1 % 302
Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates II Clarksville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA 100 Oaks Fultondale, AL <;">Englewood Village WY 61
235 Feb-04 HTA Jonesboro Jonesboro, GA 75 91.8 % 292 Cheyenne, WyomingTotal/Weighted Feb-04 HTA Bermuda Palms 461 86.8 % $ 269 Indio, CA 185 Feb-04 HTA Breazeale Laramie, WY 117 Feb-04 HTA Broadmore Goshen, IN 370 Feb-04 HTA Butler Creek Augusta, GA 376 Feb-04 HTA 103 Rental Income Camden Point Kingsland, GA 268 Feb-04 HTA Carnes Crossing Summerville, SC 604 Feb-04
Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name &void;"> HTA Castlewood Estates Mableton, GA 334 Feb-04 HTA Casual Estates Liverpool, NY 961 Feb-04 HTA Riverdale Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Riverdale, GA 481 Feb-04 HTA Columbia Heights Grand Forks, ND 302 Feb-04 HTA
Per Month Salina, Kansas Conway, SC 299 Feb-04 HTA Crestview Cedar Creek Stillwater, OK 238 Feb-04 HTA Country Village Jacksonville, FL 643 Feb-04 HTA
KS 155 Tyler, TX 194 Feb-04 HTA Eagle Point Marysville, WA 58.7 % $ 290 Prairie Village KS 130 80.8 % 237 230 Feb-04 HTA Falcon Farms Port Byron, IL 215 Feb-04 HTA Forest Creek Elkhart, IN 167 Feb-04
West Cloud
Commons KS 106 65.1 % 278 HTA Fountainvue Lafontaine, IN 120 Feb-04 HTA Salina, KansasTotal/Weighted Average Foxhall Village Raleigh, NC 315 Feb-04 HTA Golden Valley Douglasville, GA 131 Feb-04 391 67.8 % $ HTA Huron Estates Cheboygan, MI
266 Fayetteville/Springdale, Arkansas 111 Feb-04 HTA Indian Rocks Largo, FL 148 Feb-04 HTA Knoll Terrace Corvallis, OR 212 Feb-04 HTA La Quinta Ridge Indio, CA Northern Hills AR gn="right" style="margin:0pt 10.0pt .0001pt 0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">151 Feb-04 HTA
89.0 % Montgomery, AL 396 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Estates Davenport, IA 180 Feb-04 HTA Landmark Village Fairburn, GA 524 $ 229 Western Park Feb-04 HTA Marnelle Fayetteville, GA 205 Feb-04 HTA Oak Ridge Elkhart, IN
AR 113 73.5 204 Feb-04 HTA Oakwood Forest Greensboro, NC 482 % 226 Oak Glen AR
Feb-04 HTA Pedalers Pond Lake Wales, FL 214 Feb-04 HTA Pinecrest Village Shreveport, LA 87 85.1 % 225 446 Feb-04 HTA Pleasant Ridge Mount Pleasant, MI 305 Fayetteville/Springdale, ArkansasTotal/Weighted
Average 381 HTA Presidents Park 83.5 % $ 228 Naples, Florida Grand Forks, ND 174 Feb-04 HTA Riverview Clackamas, OR 133 Feb-04 HTA Saddlebrook N. Charleston, SC 425 Feb-04 HTA Sherwood Hartford City, IN 134 Feb-04 HTA
Southwind Village Naples, FL 337 Feb-04 HTA Springfield Farms Brookline Sta, MO 290 Feb-04 HTA Stonegate Shreveport, LA Southwind Village FL 364 87.6 % $ 399 Dubuque, Iowa 157 Feb-04 HTA Terrace Heights Dubuque, IA 317 Feb-04 HTA Torrey Hills Flint, MI 377 F-47
&="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;"> Feb-04 HTA
Terrace Heights * IA 317 77.9 % $ 285 Waterloo, Iowa Cedar Knoll IA 290 Twin Pines Goshen, IN 238 Feb-04 HTA Villa Flint, MI 319 Feb-04 HTA Winter Haven Oaks Winterhaven, FL 343 Feb-04 HTA Green Park South Pelham, AL 421 Feb-04 HTA Hunter Ridge Jonesboro, GA 838 Feb-04 HTA Friendly Village Lawrenceville, GA 203 Feb-04 HTA Misty Winds Corpus Christi, TX 354 Feb-04 HTA Shadow Hills Orlando, FL 670 Feb-04 HTA Smoke Creek Snellville, GA 264 Feb-04 HTA Woodlands of Kennesaw Kennesaw, GA 273 Feb-04 HTA Sunset Vista Magna, UT 207 Feb-04 HTA Sea Pines Mobile, AL 429 Feb-04 HTA Woodland Hills Montgomery, AL 95.5 % $ 214 El Paso, Texas Mission Estates * TX 628 Feb-04 HTA The Pines Ladson, SC 204 Feb-04 HTA Shady Hills Nashville, TN 251 Feb-04 286 67.8 % $ 298 HTA Trailmont Goodlettsville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA Elmira, New York Wichita, KS 254 Feb HTA Big Country Cheyenne, WY 251 Feb-04 HTA Heritage Point Montgomery, AL 264 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Lithia Springs, GA 103 Feb-04
Collingwood MHP * NY 101 HTA Plantation Estates Douglasville, GA 79.2 % $ 218 Crestview PA 97 55.7 % 230 Chelsea 138 Feb-04 HTA Green Acres Petersburg, VA
182 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Davenport, IA 124 Feb-04 HTA Evergreen Village Pleasant View, UT 238 Feb-04 HTA Four Seasons Fayetteville, GA 214 Feb-04 HTA Alafia Riverfront Riverview, FL 96 Feb-04 HTA Highland Elkhart, IN 246 Feb-04 HTA Birchwood Farms Birch Run, MI 143 Feb-04 HTA Cedar Terrace Cedar Rapids, IA 255 Feb-04 HTA Five Seasons Davenport Davenport, IA 270 Feb-04 HTA Silver Creek Davenport, IA 280 Feb-04 HTA Encantada Las Cruces, NM PA 84 84.5 % 354 Feb-04 HTA Royal Crest Los Alamos, NM 180 Feb-04 HTA Brookside Village 256 Elmira, New YorkTotal/Weighted Average Dallas, TX 394 Feb-04 HTA Meadow Glen Keller, TX
282 409 Feb-04 HTA Silver Leaf Mansfield, TX 145 Mar-04 72.7 % $ HTA Lamplighter Village Marietta, GA 431 Mar-04 HTA Shadowood Acworth, GA 506 Mar-04 HTA Stone Mountain 234 Bloombsburg, Pennsylvania Stone Mountain, GA 354 Mar-04 HTA Marion Village Marion, IA
Brookside Village PA 171 486 Mar-04 HTA Autumn Forest Brown Summit, NC 299 81.9 % $ 235 Pleasant View
Estates PA HTA Woodlake Greensboro, NC 308 Mar-04 HTA Arlington Lakeside Arlington, TX 69.4
233 Apr-04 HTA Pine Ridge Sarasota, FL 126 Apr-04 HTA Cedar Knoll 242 Bloombsburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 279 Waterloo, IA 290 Apr-04 HTA Mallard Lake Pontoon Beach, IL 278 % $ 237 Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New York Forest Park NY 183 99.5 % $ 357 Birch Meadows NY 62 98.4 % 372 Park D'Antoine NY 17 94.1 % 269
Jun-04 NA Kopper View West Valley City, UT 61 Jun-04 NA Overpass Point Tooele, UT 182 Jun-04 D.A.M.
Albany/Schenectady/Troy, New YorkTotal/Weighted
Average 262 98.9 % $ 354 Pleasant View Berwick, PA 108 F-48 Jun-04 D.A.M. Brookside Berwick, PA Huntsville, Texas 171 Jun-04 D.A.M. Beaver Run Linkwood, MD 118 Jun-04 D.A.M. Carsons Chambersburg, PA 130 Jun-04 D.A.M.
Chelsea Sayre, PA 85 Jun-04 D.A.M. Collingwood Horseheads, NY 101 Jun-04 D.A.M. Crestview Sayre, PA 98 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Danboro Danboro, PA 231 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Ephrata Tanglewood * TX 262 77.1 % $ 301 &nbse-break-after:avoid;">Ephrata, PA 149 Jun-04 D.A.M. Frieden Schuylkill Haven, PA
192 Jun-04 D.A.M. Green Acres Chambersburg, PA 24 Jun-04 D.A.M. Gregory Courts Honey Brook, PA 39 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Honey Brook Honey Brook, PA 146 Jun-04 D.A.M. Huguenot Port Jervis, NY 166 Jun-04 D.A.M. Maple Manor Taylor, PA 316 Jun-04 D.A.M. Monroe Valley Jonestown, PA 44 Jun-04 D.A.M. Moosic Heights Avoca, PA 152 Jun-04 D.A.M. Mountaintop Narvon, PA 39 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Haven Blossvale, NY 130 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunny Acres 104 Rental Income Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 207 Jun-04 D.A.M. Suburban Greenburg, PA Jun-04 D.A.M. Blue Ridge Conklin, NY 69 Jun-04
D.A.M. Chambersburg I&II Chambersburg, PA 100 Jun-04 D.A.M. Hideaway Honey Brook, PA 40 Jun-04 D.A.M. Kintner Vestal, NY 55 Jun-04 D.A.M. Martins Nottingham, PA Carsons PA 130 86.2 % $ 213 Valley ViewChambersburg PA 100 60 Jun-04 D.A.M. Nichols Phoenixville, PA 10 Jun-04 87.0 % 198 Green Acres D.A.M. Scenic View East Earl, PA 18 Jun-04 D.A.M. PA 24 100.0 % Shady Grove Atglen, PA 40 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Blandon Fleetwood, PA 30 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Morgantown Morgantown, PA 23 Jun-04 D.A.M. 211 Chambersburg, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average Valley View in Tuckerton Reading, PA 74 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Wernersville Wernersville, PA 29 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Terrace Schuylkill Haven, PA 25 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunnyside Trooper, PA 71 254 87.8 % $ 207 Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania D.A.M. Oakwood Lake Village Tunkhannock, PA 79 Jul-04 NA Western Mobile Estates West Valley City, UT 145 Sep-04 NA Willow
Creek Estates Ogden, UT 137 On
March 16, 2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common
OP Unit. We paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on
April 15, 2005 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2005. In
addition, on March 16, 2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each
Series A Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid April 30,
2005 to unitholders of record on April 15, 2005. In addition, on
March 16, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the
Series B and Series C Preferred OP Units. This distribution was
paid on April 30, 2005 to the unitholders of record on April 15,
2005. F-49 On May 23,
2005, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1875 per Common OP Unit. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $8.1 million on July 15,
2005 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2005. In addition, on May 23,
2005 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series A Preferred OP Unit.
This distribution was paid July 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on July 15,
2005. In addition, on May 23, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit
distribution on both the Series B and Series C Preferred OP Units.
This distribution was paid on July 29, 2005 to the unitholders of record
on July 15, 2005. At June 30,
2005, Partners Capital included 2,261,451 OP Units that were issued to various
limited partners and 1,005,688 PPUs issued on June 30, 2004 as part of the
D.A.M. portfolio acquisition. Each OP Unit outstanding is paired with 1.9268
shares of ARCs special voting stock (each a Paired Equity Unit) that allows
each holder to vote an OP Unit on matters as if it were a common share of ARCs
stock. Each OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at ARCs election, one share of
ARCs common stock. During the second quarter of 2005, the Partnership redeemed
for cash approximately 142,000 OP Units totaling approximately
$1.8 million. The PPUs
outstanding as of June 30, 2005 consist of 300,000 Series B units
and 705,688 Series C units. The Series B PPUs carry a liquidation
preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per
annum, payable quarterly. The Series B PPUs can be redeemed at the
option of the Operating Partnership for ARCs common stock, cash and/or notes
payable after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. In July 2005,
according to the terms of the Series B PPUs, the Series B PPU
holders requested redemption of their units, and the Operating Partnership
elected to repurchase them for approximately $2.5 million in cash and
notes payable totaling approximately $5.0 million. As of June 30,
2005, we have accrued $78,125 of the Series B PPU preferred distribution,
representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series B
preferred unitholders through that date. The Series C PPUs carry a liquidation preference of
$25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable
quarterly. The Series C PPUs can be redeemed at the option of the
Operating Partnership for cash after the fifth anniversary of their issuance. Series C
PPU holders can request redemption of their units after the two and a half year
anniversary of issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem
the PPUs or repurchase them with ARC common stock, cash and/or a note payable,
at the Operating Partnerships option. Series B and C units have the
same priority as to the payment of distributions. As of June 30, 2005, we
had accrued $183,773 of the Series C PPU preferred distribution,
representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series C
preferred unitholders through that date. 4. Rental
and Other Property, Net The following summarizes rental and
other property (in thousands): June 30, Frieden Manor PA 193 85.5 % $ 240 Pine Terrace * PA 25 72.0
December 31, Land $ 211,822 % 214 Schuylkill Haven, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average &nbalign:left;">$ 211,383 Land improvements and buildings 1,297,792 1,268,002 218 83.9 % $ 238 Rental homes and improvements 249,169 Hays, Kansas
197,668 Furniture, equipment and vehicles 14,478 12,434 Subtotal 1,773,261 1,689,487 Countryside (186,221 ) (156,707 ) Rental and other property, net $ KS 212 1,587,040 $
80.2 % $ 253 Western Slope of Colorado We have capitalized interest and internal costs of
$0.2 million and $0.5 million in the cost of land and building
improvements and manufactured home purchases for the three and six months ended
F-50 June 30, 2005,
respectively, as compared to $1.7 million and $2.4 million capitalized
during the same periods in 2004. 5. Notes Payable (including
$25.8 million due to general partner) The following table sets forth
certain information regarding our notes payable (in thousands): June 30, December 31, Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum $ 302,325 $ 303,903 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014, 5.53% per annum 211,921 213,333 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum 98,926 99,651 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.00%
per annum (6.22% at June 30, 2005) 140,468 150,871 Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through
2031, averaging 7.31% per annum Picture Ranch * CO 114 93.9 % $ 257 The Vineyards * CO 97 91.8 % 316 Western Slope of ColoradoTotal/Weighted
Average
153,074 153,818 Revolving credit mortgage facility due 2005, LIBOR plus
2.95% per annum (6.17% at June 30, 2005) 58,764 51,000 Trust preferred securities due 2035, LIBOR plus 3.25% per
annum (6.26% at June 30, 2005) (due to general partner) 25,780 Consumer finance facility due 2008, LIBOR plus 3.00% per
annum (6.18% at June 30, 2005) 9,369 Lease receivable facility due 2007, LIBOR plus 7.00% per
annum (10.22% at June 30, 2005) 42,100 Floorplan line of credit due 2007, ranging from prime
plus 0.75% to prime plus 4.00% per annum (averaging 6.59% at June 30,
2005) 43,945 27,999 Other loans 211 92.9 % $ 283 Somerset, Pennsylvania Sunny Acres PA 207 96.6 % $ 227 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2,332 1,047 $ 1,089,004 $ 1,001,622 Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 on May 2,
2002. It is an obligation of certain of our special purpose real property
subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The
Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per
annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and matures on May 1,
2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established
reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance,
capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating
expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The Senior Fixed Rate
Mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based pret .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on February 18,
2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown
acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the
Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities
owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 bears
interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year
schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the
mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties
for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating
expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 contains customary
defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. F-51 Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on February 18,
2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the Hometown
acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries of the
Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home communities
owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 bears
interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year
amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the
mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and
property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 contains
customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to
maturity. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2006 We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006
on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of our IPO and the
Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44 manufactured home
communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due
2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the
one-month LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006.
At our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the Senior
Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In
connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay
extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance,
respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in the
event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to purchase
such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee equal to
0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal amount of
the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount equal to 0.50%
of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by the lenders to
refinance the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006. Pursuant to the terms of
the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged
properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property
operating expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006
subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number
of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for
prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to
24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages
Due 2005 Through 2031 We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in
connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at
the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to
refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by
specific manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment
penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are
as follows: a) Mortgages assumed and one
refinanced as part of individual property purchases. These notes total
approximately $46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006
through 2028 and have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%. b) Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the Hometown
acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30,
2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual
interest rate of 7.06%. c) Notes assumed in conjunction
with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately
$29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average
effective annual interest rate of 7.18%. F-52 Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit
Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is
an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by 33
communities that previously secured the cancelled Senior Revolving Credit
Facility (see Note 6 to the ARCs consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K), as
well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to our IPO. Advances
under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by borrowing base
requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing
the loan. As amended in September 2005, the Revolving Credit Mortgage
Facility bears interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September&nb="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.15pt;">
Suburban Estates PA 202 93.1 % $ 223 Los Alamos, New Mexico Royal Crest * NM 178 Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035
(Due to General Partner) On March 15, 2005, the Company issued
$25.8 million in unsecured trust preferred securities to ARC. The
$25.8 million trust preferred securities bear interest at 3-month
LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30, 2005). Interest on the securities is
paid on the 30th of March, June, September and December of
each year. The Company may redeem these securities on or after March 30,
2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued
interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if
not redeemed sooner. We entered
into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility (the Consumer
Finance Facility) on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion
of our IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in
connection with entering into a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving
lease receivables credit facility (see Lease Receivables Facility below). The
Consumer Finance Facility, as amended, has a total commitment of
$125.0 million and a term of four years. This facility is an obligation of
a subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, and borrowings under this facility
are secured by manufactured housing conditional sales contracts. Borrowings
under the facility are limited by specified borrowing base requirements related
to the value of the collateral securing the facility. The facility bears
interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00% over the one-month
LIBOR (6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes customary
affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth
and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial
covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the quarter, we
paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the original committed amount and 0.75% of
the amended committed amount and will pay additional annual commitment fees
payable on each anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be
subject to a number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit
screening guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of
our communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a
single-section home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan
amount shall not exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional
sales contract. The availability of advances under the Consumer Finance
Facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control.
Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities
include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of
certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities or
mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender
determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient
to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a
request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that we prepay
amounts funded or provide additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is
necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio. F-53 On April 6,
2005, the Company obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving
credit facility (the Lease Receivables Facility) with Merrill Lynch Mortgage
Capital Inc. to be used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and
for general corporate purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the
facility increased to $150 million effective October 14, 2005. This
facility is an obligation of two indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company,
ARC Housing LLC and ARC Housing TX LP (collectively, Housing). Borrowings
under the Lease Receivables Facility are secured by an assignment of all lease
receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a
pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in
Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the
lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net
book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and
located in ARCs communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable
borrowing base requirements, (ii) increased the interest rate on borrowings
under the facility from 3.25% pafter:avoid;"> 78.1 % $ 473 Killeen-Temple, Texas Bluebonnet
Estates * Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real
Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to
the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate
has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional
collateral for the facility. In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of
credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by
manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender
will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first
$40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in
advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due
upon sale or lease of the related manufactured home. Advances under the amended
line of credit will bear interest ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the
prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the
length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments
are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days following the purchase of
the home. The required curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of
the homes original invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number
of months since the homes purchase. The amended line of credit requires the
Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of
$500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3 to 1, and
minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million, all as defined in the
agreement. We are in compliance with all financial covenants under the line of
credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit is subject to a commitment
fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per annum and an early:avoid;text-align:right;"> TX 173 75.1 F-54 The following table reflects the
calculation of loss per unit (amounts in thousands, except per unit
information): Three Months Ended % $ 330 Lancaster, Pennsylvania 2005 2004 2005 2004 Loss per unit from continuing
operations:
Loss from
continuing operations $ (16,351 ) $ (5,326 ) $ (30,384 ) $ (42,578 ) Preferred
unit distributions (2,971 ) (2,578 ) (5,942 ) Valley ViewEphrata (3,810 ) Net loss
from continuing operations $ (19,322 ) $ (7,904 ) $ (36,326 ) $ (46,388 ) Loss per
unit from continuing operations $ (0.45 ) $ (0.18 ) $ (0.84 ) $ (1.24 ) Income per
unit from discontinued operations: PA 149 98.7 % $ 185 Binghamton, New York Income
from discontinued operations $ 72 $ 343 1,000 $ 795 Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations 52 (678 ) Net
income from discontinued operations $ 124 $ 343 $ 322 $ 795 Income
per unit from discontinued operations $ Blue Ridge MHP * NY
$ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.02 Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders: 68 89.7 % $ 230 Kintner Estates * NY 55 94.5 % 252 Binghamton, New YorkTotal/Weighted
Average
Net loss
to common OP unitholders $ (19,198 ) $ (7,561 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders $ 123 91.9 % (0.45 ) $
$ 240 Cambridge, Maryland Beaver Run (0.17 ) $ (0.83 ) $ (1.22 ) Weighted
average unit information: Total units outstanding MD 119 100.0 % $ 229 43,260 43,269 43,262 37,531 For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, 4.4
million units related to outstanding warrants, PPUs and OP Units and unvested
restricted units have been excluded from the diluted loss per unit calculation
as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature. Excluded from the diluted
loss per unit calculation for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004, were 2.4 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively. 7. Property Operations Expense During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred property operations expense as
follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 105 2005 2004 2005 2004 Utilities and telephone Rental Income $ 7,112 $ 6,833 $ 15,075 $ 11,751 Salaries and benefits 6,991 Per Occupied Number of Occupancy Homesite Community Name Held for Sale State Homesites 06/30/05 Per Month Reading, Pennsylvania Valley ViewReading (Tuckerton)
5,255 13,018 9,262 Repairs and maintenance 2,695 2,594 5,362 4,129 Insurance 926 827 1,803 1,400 Bad debt expense 568 610 * PA 69 89.9 % $ 315 Valley ViewFleetwood * PA 30 93.3 % 305 Valley ViewWernersville * PA 1,095 Advertising 85 256 290 507 Other operating expense 1,665 1,251 3,386 23 87.0 % 287 Reading, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted
Average 122 90.2 % $ 307 Laramie, Wyoming
2,090 $ 20,042 $ 17,626 $ 40,363 $ 30,234 F-55 8. Retail Home Sales, Finance
and Insurance Expense During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred retail home sales, finance and
insurance expense as follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 2005 2004 Breazeale 2005 2004 Utilities and telephone $ 70 WY 117 96.6 %
$ 16 $ 110 $ 37 Salaries and benefits 2,105 793 3,463 1,224 Repairs and maintenance 32 $ 312 Farmington, New Mexico Sunset Mobile
Village * NM 112 94.6 % 96 51 262 Insurance 107 $ 262 <0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 71 195 74 Bad debt expense 280 10 309 10 Advertising 825 154 1,914 208 Other operating expense 693 358 1,275 264 $ 4,112 $ 1,498 $ 7,317 $ 2,079
Harrisburg/Lebanon/Carlisle, Pennsylvania During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we incurred general and administrative
expense as follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Monroe Valley PA 44 100.0 2005 2004 2005 2004 Salaries and benefits(a) $ 3,506 $ 2,533 $ 6,646 $ 15,284 Travel % $ 252 Total / Weighted
Average
625 62,942 84.5 % $ 326 On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors
authorized the sale of up to 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales and assuming that all
communities are sold, ARC will continue to own approximately 237 communities
that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy
objectives. See Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated
Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma
Financial Data for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and
ARC of these sales and the sale of the notes. We compete with other owners and operators of manufactured
home communities, as well as owners, operators and suppliers of alternative
forms of housing such as multifamily housing and site-built homes, including
rental properties. All of our properties are located in markets that include
other manufactured home communities. The number of competing manufactured home
communities in a particular market could have a material effect on our ability
to sell our homes or homesites, lease our homes or homesites and to maintain or
raise rents. In addition, our communities generally are located in developed
areas that include other competitive housing alternatives, such as apartments,
land available for the placement of manufactured homes outside of established
communities and new or existing site-built housing stock, as well as more
favorable financing alternatives for the same. The availability of these
competing housing options in the markets in which we operate could have a
material effect on our occupancy and rents. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to
Our Properties and Operations. With respect to acquisitions, we may compete
with numerous other potential buyers (some with potentially greater resources
or superior information), which could drive up acquisition costs and/or impede
our ability to acquire additional communities at acceptable prices. We believe we currently have a leading market share in 15
of our top 20 markets, which collectively represent approximately 69% of our
total homesites and 73% of our total rental income. Generally, manufactured home communities are subject to
various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to
recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other 106 common areas. Each state and, in
some instances, individual municipalities, have enacted laws that govern the
relationships between landlord and tenants. Changes in any of these laws or
regulations, as well as changes in laws increasing the potential liability for
environmental conditions or circumstances existing on properties or laws
affecting development, construction, operation, upkeep and safety requirements
may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of homesites or
other impairments to operations, which would adversely affect our cash flows
from operating activities. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Properties
and Operations. The Federal Fair Housing Act, its state law counterparts
and the regulations promulgated by HUD and various state agencies, prohibit
discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin,
religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living
with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women and people securing custody of
children under 18) and handicap (disability) and, in some states, on
financial capability. A failure to comply with these laws in our operations
could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could
result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which
could have an adverse effect on our cash flows from operations. A variety of laws affect the sale of manufactured homes on
credit, including the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act
(Truth-in-Lending), Regulation Z, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act
and the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as well as similar state laws or
regulations. The Federal Trade Commission has issued or proposed various Trade
Regulation Rules dealing with unfair credit practices, collection efforts,
preservation of consumers claims and defenses and the like. A variety of laws affect lease with option to purchase
arrangements for manufactured homes, including Regulation M, as well as
similar state laws. We have developed a lease with option to purchase program
which seeks to comply with these laws, but there is little or no application,
interpretation or precedent with respect to the application of these laws to
our program. A failure to comply with these laws could result in significant
costs of bringing our program into compliance, legal actions and limitations or
restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could have an adverse
affect on our cash flows from operations. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA,
all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal
requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements
became effective in 1992. A number of additional federal, state and local laws
also exist that may require modifications to the properties, or restrict
certain further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled
persons. For example, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA,
requires apartment properties first occupied after march 13, 1990 to be
accessible to the handicapped. Noncompliance with the ADA or the FHAA could
result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants
and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature and in
substantial capital expenditures. To the extent our properties are not in
compliance, we are likely to incur additional costs to comply with the ADA, the
FHAA or other legislation. Warranties provided by us are subject to a variety of state
laws and regulations. Our sale of manufactured homes may be subject to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Sales practices are governed at both the
federal and state level through various consumer protection trade practices and
public accommodation laws and regulations. Insurance activities are subject to state insurance laws
and regulations as determined by the particular insurance commissioner for each
state in accordance with the McCarran-Ferguson Act, as well as subject to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Property management activities are often subject to state
real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real
estate commission for each state. 107 Changes in any of the laws governing our conduct could have
an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business or could materially
affect our financial position, operating income, expense or cash flow. Certain states and municipalities have adopted laws and
regulations specifically regulating the ownership and operation of manufactured
home communities. These laws and regulations include provisions imposing
restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases and, in certain
circumstances, granting to community residents a right of first refusal on a
sale of their community by the owner to a third party. Enactments of similar
laws have been considered from time to time in other jurisdictions. We
currently own 8,364 homesites in two states that have rent control regulations,
Florida and California. These communities represent 9.8% of our total
communities and 13.3% of our total homesites. Following the sale of up to 79 communities
announced on September 21, 2005 and assuming that all these communities
are sold communities, we will own 6,287 homesites in Florida in 21 communities
representing 12.7% of our total homesites and 8.9% of our total communities,
and no communities in California. We presently expect to continue to operate
manufactured home communities, and may in the future acquire manufactured home
communities, in areas that either are subject to one or more of these types of
laws or regulations or in which legislation with respect to such laws or
regulations may be enacted in the future. Laws and regulations regulating
landlord/tenant relationships or otherwise relating to the ownership and
operation of manufactured home communities, whether existing law or enacted in
the future, could limit our ability to increase rents or recover increases in
our operating expenses and could make it more difficult for us to dispose obreak-after:avoid;text-align:right;">509 1,177 1,076 Professional services 1,219 499 2,209 1,160 Insurance 329 141 437 Under federal, state and local environmental regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to
investigate and clean up a release of hazardous substances at such property,
and may, under such laws and common law, be held liable for property damage and
other costs incurred by third parties in connection with such releases. The
liability under certain of these laws has been interpreted to be joint and
several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for
allocation of responsibility. The failure to properly remediate the property
may also adversely affect the owners ability to lease, sell or rent the
property or to borrow using the property as collateral. In connection with the
ownership, operation and management of our properties, we could be legally
responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our
properties or properties that we may acquire or manage in the future. We
conduct an environmental review of each property prior to acquisition. We have
obtained Phase I reviews on all but one of our properties and are not aware of
any environmental issues that may materially impact the operations of any
communities. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Properties and Operations. We believe that our properties are covered by adequate
fire, flood and property insurance as well as commercial liability insurance
provided by reputable companies and with commercially reasonable deductibles
and limits. Furthermore, we believe our businesses and business assets are
likewise adequately insured against casualty loss and third-party liabilities. Changes
in the insurance market since September 11, 2001, have caused significant
increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have increased the risk that
affordable insurance may not be available in the future. Our employees are all employed by our management services
subsidiary and perform various property management, maintenance, acquisition,
renovation and management functions. As of June 30, 2005, our 108 management services subsidiary had
1,167 full-time equivalent employees. None of the employees is represented by a
union. We are a party to various legal
actions resulting from our operating activities. These actions consist of
litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business, some of which are covered by liability insurance, and none of which
is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole. 109 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Pursuant to the Partnerships partnership agreement, ARC is
the sole general partner of the Partnership and has, subject to certain
protective rights of limited partners described below, full, exclusive and
complete responsibility and discretion in the Partnerships management and
control, including the ability to cause the Partnership to enter into certain
major transactions including a merger or a sale of substantially all of its
assets. See Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership AgreementGeneral;
Management of the Partnership. The management and operation of the Partnership
is carried out by ARC, and the persons who perform these management and
operation functions on behalf of ARC are employees of ARCs management services subsidiary, as
permitted pursuant to the Partnerships partnership agreement. Directors and Executive Officers of
ARC The board of directors of ARC
presently consists of ten members. ARCs board is not classified and thus all
of its directors are elected annually. The directors and executive officers of
ARC are listed below. Name Age Position Larry D. Willard 63 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director James F. Kimsey 57 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director Scott D. Jackson 50 385 Rent 46 87 99 259 Other administrative expense 534 535 1,050 935 $ 6,259 $ 4,304 $ 11,618 $ 19,099 John G. Sprengle 49 Vice Chairman and Director Eugene Mercy, Jr. 69 Director W. Joris Brinkerhoff 54 Director Gerald J. Ford 62 Director
(a) The six
months ended June 30, 2004 includes $10.1 million incurred in
conjunction with ARCs IPO in which ARC granted 530,000 shares of restricted
stock that vested immediately (see Note 1). In July 2004,
we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities
comprising 2,933 homesites. In addition to the 12 communities, as part of the
auction, the Partnership also contracted to sell two parcels of undeveloped
commercial land located adjacent to one of its communities in Colorado. The
auction was held in September 2004. These sales, other than the sale of
one of the 12 properties, closed during the fourth quarter of 2004, resulting
in net proceeds to the Partnership of $21.6 million after selling
commissions, sales expenses and the repayment of approximately
$6.0 million of associated debt. The remaining community continues to be
held for sale and was classified as discontinued operations as of December 31,
2004 and June 30, 2005, based on the Partnerships intent to sell this
community during 2005. In September 2004,
we entered into an agreement to sell three communities, comprising 1,073
homesites, to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales price of
approximately $5.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth quarter
of 2004. F-56 In October 2004,
we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell 12 communities
comprising 2,440 homesites. The auction was held in December 2004. Eleven
of these 12 sales closed during the first quarter of 2005, resulting in net
proceeds to the Partnership of $12.4 million after selling commissions,
sales expenses and the repayment of approximately $28.9 million of
associated debt included in liabilities related to assets held for sale, and
other required debt payments. The remaining community was sold in April 2005.
Also in October 2004, we entered into agreements to sell three communities
comprising 709 homesites to unaffiliated third parties for a total sales price
of approximately $7.9 million. These sales closed during the fourth
quarter of 2004. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, each of the communities
sold during 2005 and 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. We have included
$3.4 million and $54.1 million of net assets related to these
communities as assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. We
have also included $2.7 million and $29.5 million of obligations
related to these communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in
the accompanying balance sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. In addition, we have presented the operations of each of
these communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 and recorded income of $0.1 million and a loss of
$0.7 million, respectively, related to the sale of the discontinued
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. The following
table summarizes combined balance sheet and income statement information for
the discontinued operations noted above (in thousands): June 30, December 31, Assets 58 Director Carl B. Webb<"2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">
Rental and other property, net $ 3,035 $ 52,848 Tenant, notes and other receivables, net 309 Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net 593 Prepaid expenses and other assets 333 373
55 Director J. Markham Green 62 Director Lawrence E. Kreider $ 3,368 $ 54,123
58 Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer Scott L.
Gesell 46 Executive
Vice President and General Counsel The
principal occupation and business experience for each of our officers and
directors and key employees, for at least the last five years, are as follows: Larry D. Willard, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and Director. Liabilities Notes payable $ 2,700 $ 28,951 Accounts payable and accrued expenses James F. Kimsey, President, Chief
Operating Officer and Director. Mr. Kimsey assumed the
position of ARCs President and Chief Operating Officer on September 21,
2005. Mr. Kimsey has also served as a director of ARC since June 30,
2005. Mr. Kimsey retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of 110 RailWorks Corporation in 2004, a position he had held since
2002. From 2001 through 2002 he also served as the President of Western Utility
Services on behalf of Exelon Infrastructure Services, a successor to Fischback &
Moore Electric, LLC for whom Mr. Kimsey was the President and Chief
Executive Officer from 1995 to 2001. In 1997 Mr. Kimsey founded Kimsey
Electrical Contracting, LLC, serving as its Chairman. From 1970 to 1995 he
served in various capacities with Sturgeon Electric Co., Inc, succeeding
to MYR Group President in 1984, a position he held until 1995. Mr. Kimsey
is a graduate of the University of Denver where he received a BSBA degree in
Accounting. Scott D. Jackson, Vice Chairman and
Director. Mr. Jackson
assumed the position of ARCs Vice Chairman on September 21, 2005.
Mr. Jackson also co-founded ARCs predecessor in interest in 1995 and
served as ARCs Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since ARCs inception in
1998 until he became ARCs Vice Chairman. He additionally served as ARCs
Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004 to March 30, 2005.
Mr. Jackson directs ARCs sales of communities. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Jackson
served in various senior positions in financial service companies owned or
controlled by, among others, Gerald J. Ford. In these capacities, he
oversaw corporate finance activities, including financial service company
acquisition, disposition and capital financing activities. Previously, Mr. Jackson
worked in corporate finance as Vice President of Corporate Finance and served
as Co-Head of the Financial Institutions Restructuring Group for Goldman, Sachs &
Co. from 1987 to 1991; as Senior Vice President and Manager of Republic Bank
Capital Markets from 1985 to 1987; and with Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from
1979 to 1985. Mr. Jackson holds a B.S. degree in Business Finance and
Marketing from Colorado State University. John G. Sprengle, Vice Chairman and
Director. Mr. Sprengle
co-founded ARCs predecessor in interest in 1995. Mr. Sprengle has served
as a director and Vice Chairman of ARC since April 8, 2002. Mr. Sprengle has also served as ARCs
Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1999, Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to
November 1, 2004 and Co-Chief Operating Officer from November 1, 2004
to March 30, 2005. Prior to 1995, Mr. Sprengle served in various
positions at BancTEXAS Group, Inc., a bank holding company. In his final
positions, he served as a Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer,
respectively. (1980 to 1986 and 1988 to 1994). Mr. Sprengle served as the
Vice President of Administration for the capital markets group of First
Republic Bank, Dallas from 1986 to 1987. Mr. Sprengle holds a B.S. degree
in Business Administration and Finance from Colorado State University. Eugene Mercy, Jr., Director. Mr. Mercy has served as
a director of ARC since April 2002. Mr. Mercy is currently a
Principal in Granite Capital International Group, a New York money management
firm, and a Senior Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Mr. Mercy is
a former Limited Partner of Goldman Sachs & Co., where he was in the
Securities Sales and Equity Trading Department and the Commercial Real Estate
Department. He later became the Partner-in-Charge of the Mortgage Securities
Department of Goldman Sachs. In 1996, Mr. Mercy was appointed to the
Goldman Sachs Limited Partner Advisory Committee, and after Goldman Sachs
successful public offering in May 1999, he became a Senior Director of
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Managing member of EMJ Development, LLC and
Chairman of the Board of Brownfields Capital LLC. Mr. Mercy is a Trustee
Emeritus of the board of Lehigh University, Vice Chairman of Continuum Health
Partners, Inc. and former Vice Chairman of the Board of the Loomis
Institute. He is a Trustee of Public Color, a Trustee of NY Services for the
Handicapped, a member of the board of trustees and executive committee of Seeds
of Peace. He is a member of the board of the Vail Village Homeowners
Association and a member of the Print and Rare Book Acquisition Committee of
the Museum of Modern Art. Mr. Mercy is a graduate of Lehigh University and
served as a First Lieutenant in the U.S. Army. W. Joris Brinkerhoff, Director. Mr. Brinkerhoff has
served as a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Brinkerhoff
founded a Native American owned joint venture, Doyon LTD, in 1978 and
served as its operations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
until selling his venture interests in 1995 and moving to Denver in 1996.
Doyon LTD designed, built, leased and operated state of the art mobile
drilling rigs for ARCO and British Petroleum in conjunction with their
development of the North Slope 111 Alaska petroleum fields. Mr. Brinkerhoff now resides
in Denver and manages family interests including oil and gas production, a
securities portfolio and various other business interests, as well as actively
participating in numerous philanthropic organizations. Mr. Brinkerhoff is
a graduate of Montana School of Mines with a Bachelor of Science Degree in
Petroleum Engineering. Gerald J. Ford, Director. Mr. Ford has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Ford is a banking and
financial institutions entrepreneur who has been involved in numerous mergers
and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions, primarily
in the Southwest United States, over the past 30 years. In this capacity
he acquired and consolidated 30 commercial banks from 1975 to 1993, forming
First United Bank Group, Inc., a multi-bank holding company for which he
functioned as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until its sale
in 1994. During this period he also led investment consortiums that acquired
numerous financial institutions, forming in succession First Gibraltar Bank,
FSB, First Madison Bank and First Nationwide Bank. Mr. Ford also served as
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State
Bancorp Inc and California Federal Bank from 1998 to 2002. He currently
participates on numerous boards of directors, including Triad Financial
Corporation for which he is also Chairman of the Board, First Acceptance
Corporation, for which he is also Chairman of the Board, McMoRan Exploration
Co., and Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Mr. Ford holds a
nt-size:10.0pt;">34 262 Tenant deposits and other liabilities (78 ) 303 Total Liabilities $ 2,656 $ 29,516 James R. Randy Staff, Director. Mr. Staff has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Staff has been a
consultant to Hunters Glen Ford, Ltd., an investment partnership, since November 2002.
He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ganado Bancshares, Inc.
(and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Citizens State Bank, Ganado, Texas) and
ABNA Holdings, Inc. (and its 99% owned subsidiary, American Bank, N.A.,
Dallas, Texas). Previously, Mr. Staff was an Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Advisor of Golden State Bancorp and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, California Federal Bank, FSB, from October 1994 until November 2002.
During this period he also served as a Director of California Federal Bank, FSBs
subsidiaries, First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation and Auto One Acceptance
Corporation. Mr. Staff is currently a member of the Board of Triad
Financial Corporation. Mr. Staff attended the University of Houston,
graduated from the University of Texas at Austin and was also a Certified
Public Accountant. Carl B. Webb, Director. Mr. Webb has served as
a director of ARC since June 30, 2005. Mr. Webb was the President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director of San Francisco-based California
Federal Bank, the fourth largest financial institution in California, from September 1994
until the bank was purchased by a third party in November 2002. Prior to
his affiliation with California Federal Bank, Mr. Webb was the President
and CEO of First Madison Bank, FSB (1993 and 1994) and First Gibraltar Bank,
FSB (1988 to 1993), as well as President and Director of First National Bank at
Lubbock (1983 to 1988). Currently, Mr. Webb sits on the Board of Directors
of Plum Creek Timber Company and is also a member of the Board of Directors of
Triad Financial Corporation. Mr. Webb received a Bachelor of Business
Administration degree from West Texas A&M University and a Graduate Banking
Degree from Southwestern Graduate School of Banking. J. Markham Green, Director. Mr. Green has served as
a director of ARC since its initial public offering in February 2004.
Mr. Green is the Chairman of the Board of PowerOne Media LLC. From
2001 to 2003, Mr. Green served as the Chairman of the Financial
Institutions and Governments Group of JP Morgan Chase. From 1993 until
joining JP Morgan Chase, he invested in and served on the boards of eight
start-up companies. From 1973, Mr. Green served in various
capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co. before he retired as a general
partner in 1992. He was co-head of the Financial Services Industry Group
of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and served on several of the firms internal
committees. Mr. Green is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin
and earned an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University. 112 Lawrence E. Kreider, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Kreider joined ARC
in 2001 as an Executive Vice President, also serving as Chief Financial Officer
from 2001 to 2003 and from November 1, 2004 to present, as well as Chief
Information Officer since 2002 and Chief Accounting Officer since 2004. During this
time he has also served as Executive Vice President Finance. Mr. Kreider
has direct responsibility for all financial and information technology
activities of ARC and also participates in strategic planning activities. Prior
to joining ARC in 2001, Mr. Kreider was Senior Vice President of Finance
for Warnaco Group Inc. and President of Warnaco Europe. Prior thereto, Mr. Kreider
served in several senior finance positions, including Senior Vice President,
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, with Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings from 1986 to 1999. Prior thereto, he served in senior finance
positions with Zale Corporation, Johnson Matthew Jewelry Corporation and
Refinement International Company. Mr. Kreider began his career with
Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Kreider holds an masters in business
administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business and a bachelor of arts
from Yale University. Scott L. Gesell, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel. Mr. Gesell
has served as a Vice President and as the General Counsel and Secretary for ARC
since he joined ARC in 1996. Mr. Gesell directs all legal matters for ARC,
including overseeing outside counsel, acquisition activities, legal matters
related to ARCs operating businesses and other corporate related activities. Prior
to joining ARC, Mr. Gesell served as General Counsel, and then as a Senior
Vice President/Director of Legal Operations, overseeing all of the banks
day-to-day legal operations for First Gibraltar Bank/First Madison Bank/First
Nationwide Bank. While with the First Gibraltar, First Madison and First
Nationwide Bank, he was significantly involved in mergers, acquisitions and
divestitures, as well as corporate and regulatory matters. Prior thereto, he
served in various legal capacities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas
and was in private practice with the law firm of Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler,
Milsten & Price in Oklahoma City. Mr. Gesell holds a bachelor of
arts and a juris doctor from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. He is a
member of the Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas bars. The Partnership has no salaried officers or employees. All
of the Partnerships operational and management functions are performed for it
by ARCs management services
subsidiary. The Partnership paid approximately $7.5 million, $11.0 million and $5.7 million to this affiliate for
these services for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the six
months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. None of the directors or
officers of ARC receives any compensation from the Partnership. The Partnership
does not pay ARC any other compensation for its services as general partner. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP AgreementDistributions, and Allocations
of Net Income and Net Loss. 113 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ARCs Vice
Chairman, Scott D. Jackson, is the sole stockholder of JJ&T, and together
with JJ&T is the 99% owner of Global Mobile. Global Mobile and JJ&T own
100% of the membership interests of Global E, which owns six manufactured home
communities with 554 total homesites located in Wyoming. One of our
subsidiaries is a party to a property management agreement with Global E
pursuant to which the subsidiary manages all of the communities owned by Global
E in consideration for a management fee equal to 3% of gross revenues. This
subsidiary also is a party to an accounting services agreement with Global E
whereby it provides accounting services for Global Mobile in exchange for a fee
of $800 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
six months ended June 30, 2005 our management services subsidiary received
$96,000, $132,000 and $197,000, respectively, pursuant to these agreements.
Neither the property management agreement nor the accounting services agreement
can be amended without ARCs consent. Mr. Jackson
has agreed that he may not terminate either the property management agreement
or the accounting services agreement for so long as he is serving as ARCs
Chairman or our Chief Executive Officer. ARC
may terminate either of these agreements upon 30 days prior written notice.
The right of first refusal granted to
ARC pursuant to his employment agreement described below would apply to the
disposition of any communities currently owned by Global E. Mr. Jackson
is subject to an employment agreement with ARC which includes a non-competition
covenant with an exception to permit him to devote time to the management and
operation of Global Mobile Limited Liability Company and JJ&T Enterprises, Inc.
consistent with past practice. In
addition, Mr. Jacksons agreement prohibits him from directly or
indirectly acquiring any manufactured home communities and also provides ARC
with a right of first refusal, for so long as he serves as our chairman or
chief executive officer, in connection with any proposed sale by Mr. Jackson
of any or all communities he owns directly or indirectly. Pursuant to this
right, ARC may acquire such community or communities at 95% of their fair
market value. In addition, beginning April 1, 2005, ARC entered into
a written lease agreement with JJ&T for a homesite for our Cheyenne,
Wyoming city managers office for a monthly rental fee of $230. We have placed
a manufactured home we own on the homesite. In the event that the lease is
terminated or the property management agreement discussed above is terminated,
then JJ & T is obligated to buy the home from us at our cost for the
purchase and set up of the home. Lease by
Windstar Aviation Corp. Global Mobile also has an airplane hangar located at
Centennial Airport, Englewood, Colorado. Windstar Aviation Corp., a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Partnership, owns airplanes that ARC uses in connection
with our operations and leases office and airplane hangar space from Global
Mobile at Centennial Airport in Englewood, Colorado. The leases were entered
into in June 1999, with a 60-month primary term and a renewal option
for an additional 60-month term. Lease payments total $4,400 per month
during the initial term, and an adjustment tied to the consumer price index is
provided for the renewal term. At December 31, 2004 companies owned and controlled by
Mr. Jackson owed ARCs management subsidiary approximately $68,000 in
accounts receivable, primarily related to rental homes acquired and property
management services performed on behalf of these companies. Pursuant to the
terms of the property management agreements between these companies and our
management subsidiary, monthly fees for property management services are paid
by these companies in the month following incurrence of the fees. At June 30,
2005, these companies owed our management subsidiary approximately $4,000. 114 Directors Holding Partnership Units Two of ARCs
directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham Green, hold common partnership
units in the Partnership through which each of Mr. Mercy and Mr. Green
has deferred gains associated with certain properties. Any decision by ARCs
board of directors to dispose of one or more of these properties in which Mr. Mercy
or Mr. Green has an interest could have tax consequences for Mr. Mercy
or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In connection with any such decision, ARCs board of
d" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Affiliate Services to the
Partnership See
Affordable Residential Communities LP ManagementCompensation for a
discussion of affiliate services to the Partnership. 115 POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES The following is a discussion of ARCs policies with
respect to investments, financing and certain other activities. These policies
apply to all of ARCs subsidiaries, including the Partnership. The Partnership
does not have any separate policies with respect to any of these activities. These
policies with respect to these activities have been determined by ARCs board
of directors and, in general, may be amended and revised from time to time at
the discretion of ARCs board of directors without notice to or a vote of ARCs
stockholders, except that changes in certain policies with respect to conflicts
of interest must be consistent with legal requirements.
2005 2004 2005 2004 Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate. ARC conducts all of its
investment activities through the Partnership and its affiliates. Our
investment objectives are to increase cash flow, maximize the value of its
communities and acquire established income-producing manufactured housing
community properties with cash flow growth potential. Additionally, we seek to
selectively expand and upgrade both our properties and any newly acquired
communities. Our business is focused primarily on manufactured housing
community properties and activities directly related thereto including our
retail home sales and leasing, consumer finance and other complementary
businesses. Our policy is to acquire assets primarily for generation of current
income and long-term value appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will
sell certain manufactured housing community properties. We have not established
a specific policy regarding the relative priority of the investment objectives.
For a discussion of our communities and our business and other strategic
objectives, see Business and Properties. We expect to pursue our investment objectives through the
direct ownership of properties, but may also make investments in other entities.
We focus on manufactured housing community properties in those states where we
operate and select new markets. We anticipate that newly acquired properties
will be located in the U.S. However, future investments, including the
activities described below, will not be limited to any geographic area or to a
specified percentage of our assets. We believe that opportunities exist to
acquire established manufactured housing community properties which do not
possess the risks inherent in new development. We believe that, in recent
years, the available investment returns have not justified the leasing risk
associated with new development and, thus, we do not presently intend to engage
in development of new communities. We intend to engage in such future
investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of
ARCs status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We also may participate with other entities in the
ownership of manufactured home communities through joint ventures or other
types of co-ownernt-weight:bold;line-height:8.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:center;"> Statement of Operations Investments in Real Estate Mortgages. While we emphasize equity
real estate investments in manufactured housing community properties, we may,
at the discretion of ARCs board of directors, invest in mortgages and other
interests related to manufactured housing community properties. We do not
presently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of
trust, but may do so subject to the investment restrictions applicable to REITs.
The mortgages in which we may invest may be either first mortgages or junior
mortgages, and may or may not be insured by a governmental agency. Investments
in real estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may default
under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing certain mortgages may
not be sufficient to enable it to recoup its full investment. 116 Investments in Chattel Paper. While we emphasize equity
real estate investments in manufactured home community properties, we intend to
invest in chattel paper. Our consumer finance initiative involves the purchase
of consumer installment sales contracts that are secured by chattel (manufactured
homes located in its communities). These installment sales contracts are
originated and serviced by an unaffiliated third party. Perfection of security
interests in chattel varies on a state-by-state basis, but is generally done by
reflecting the existence of a security interest on the title to a manufactured
home. Foreclosure of this interest also varies from state to state, but
generally follows the guidelines set forth in the UCC as adopted in the various
states. Securities or Interests in Entities Primarily Engaged in
Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers. Subject to the percentage of
ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification,
we may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities
of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such
entities. We may acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets
of other REITs or similar entities where such investment would be consistent
with our investment policies. In any event, we do not intend that investments
in securities will require ARC to register as an investment company under the
1940 Act, and ARC would intend to divest securities before any such
registration would be required. Other than with respect to investments in
wholly-owned subsidiaries, we have not engaged in any activities of this type
in the last three years. Investments in Non-Real Estate Ventures. We may seek to enter into
new non-real estate business ventures and to grow our existing non-real estate
business ventures. The Partnership owns businesses that currently do or may in
the future engage in more diverse and more risky ventures such as the sale of
manufactured homes, finance of manufactured home sales, inventory financing, mortgage
financing, sales of home improvement products, brokerage of manufac39" colspan="2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.0pt;">
Revenue $ 220 $ 3,787 $ 1,968 $ 6,285 Purchase and Sale of Investments. Our policy is to acquire
assets primarily for generation of current income and long-term value
appreciation; however, where appropriate, we will sell certain manufactured
housing community properties, and in 2003, 2004 and 2005 through September 30,
we sold one, 17 and 12 of our communities, respectively. In addition, we also engage
in the sale of manufactured homes through our wholly-owned taxable REIT
subsidiary, ARC Dealership, Inc., or Dealership. Dealerships manufactured
home sales consisted of no homes
sold in 2003, 1,341 homes sold
in 2004 and 1,763 homes sold in
2005 through June 30. We have not
established a specific policy regarding the percentage of assets that may be
invested in any of the foregoing types of investments. We presently intend to maintain a ratio of consolidated
total indebtedness-to-total market capitalization of 65% or less. ARCs total market capitalization is defined as the
sum of the market value of its outstanding common stock and preferred stock
(which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization
ratio), plus the aggregate value of partnership units in the Partnership not
owned by ARC, plus the book value of its total consolidated indebtedness. Since
this ratio is based, in part, upon market values of equity, it will fluctuate with
changes in the price of ARCs common stock; however, we believe that this ratio
provides an appropriate indication of leverage for a company whose assets are
primarily real estate. ARCs ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization as of
June 30, 2005 was approximately 60% (59% following the sale of the 79
communities, assuming the sale of all communities, and the sale of the notes by
the Partnership). ARCs charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or
percentage of indebtedness that it may incur. ARCs board of directors may from
time to time modify its debt policy in light of then-current economic
conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of its
properties, general conditions in the market for debt and equity securities,
fluctuations in the 117 market price of its common stock,
growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. Accordingly, ARC may
increase or decrease its ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization beyond
the limits described above. If these policies were changed, we could become
more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our
obligations and a related increase in debt service requirements that could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our
ability to make distributions to ARCs stockholders and the Partnerships
limited partners. To the extent that ARCs board of directors determines to
obtain additional capital, we may issue debt or equity securities, including
additional partnership units in the Partnership, retain earnings (subject to
provisions in the Internal Revenue Code requiring distributions of income to
maintain REIT status), or pursue a combination of these methods. As long as the
Partnership is in existence, the proceeds of all equity capital raised by ARC
will be contributed to the Partnership in exchange for additional interests in
the Partnership, which will dilute the ownership interests of the existing
limited partners. In 2005, we issued $25.8 million of trust preferred
securities due 2035 to ARC. Operating expenses 148 3,444 We have adopted certain policies that are designed to
eliminate or minimize certain potential conflicts of interest. In addition, ARCs
board of directors is subject to certain provisions of Maryland law, which are
also designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts. However, there can be no
assurance that these policies or provisions of law will always be successful in
eliminating the influence of such conflicts, and if they are not successful, decisions
could be made that might fail to reflect fully the interests of all
securityholders. We reserve the right to dispose of any of our properties,
based upon managements periodic review of our portfolio, if ARCs board of
directors determines that such action would be in the best interest of its
stockholders. Any decision to dispose of a property will be made by ARCs board
of directors. Two of our directors, Eugene Mercy, Jr. and J. Markham
Green, hold common partnership units in the Partnership through which Mr. Mercy
has deferred gains associated with all the properties ARC acquired in ARCs
reorganization, and Mr. Green has deferred gains associated with certain
properties ARC acquired from Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., I and
Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., II in ARCs reorganization. Any
decision by ARCs board of directors to dispose of one or more of these
properties in which Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has an interest could have
tax consequences for Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green, as the case may be. In
connection with any such decision, ARCs board of directors will determine
whether either of Messrs. Green or Mercy has a material financial interest
in the transaction that is different from the interests of stockholders
generally, and if either Mr. Mercy or Mr. Green has such an interest,
then such director will abstain from the vote of our board with respect to such
proposed transaction. Interested Director and Officer
Transactions Pursidth:29.0pt;">
968 5,490 Income from discontinued operations $ 72 ´pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.25pt;">
$ 343 118 · the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to ARC. Furthermore, under Delaware law (where the Partnership is
formed), ARC, as general partner, has a fiduciary duty to the partnership and,
consequently, such transactions also are subject to the duties of care and
loyalty that ARC, as general partner, owes to limited partners in the
partnership (to the extent such duties have not been eliminated pursuant to the
terms of the partnership agreement). ARC requires that all contracts and
transactions between it, the Partnership or any of our subsidiaries, on the one
hand, and any of ARCs directors or executive officers or any entity in which
such director or executive officer is a director or has a material financial
interest, on the other hand, must be approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of ARCs disinterested directors. Where appropriate in the judgment of
the disinterested directors, ARCs board of directors may obtain a fairness
opinion or engage independent counsel to represent the interests of
non-affiliated security holders, although ARCs board of directors will have no
obligation to do so. Pursuant to Maryland law, each ARC director is obligated to
offer to ARC any business opportunity (with certain limited exceptions) that
comes to him and that we reasonably could be expected to have an interest in
pursuing. Mr. Jackson owns interests in certain other properties. ARC does
not own any interest in these properties. See Certain Relationships and
Related TransactionsGlobal E Portfolio. Policies with Respect to Other
Activities We may, but do not presently intend to, make investments
other than as previously described. ARC has authority to offer shares of its
common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property and to
repurchase or otherwise reacquire shares of its common stock or other equity or
debt securities in exchange for property. Similarly, the Partnership may offer
additional partnership units, which are redeemable, in exchange for property. We
also may make loans to third parties, including joint ventures in which we may
participate. As described in Affordable Residential Communities LP Partnership
Agreement, ARC expects, but is not obligated, to issue shares of ARC common
stock to holders of partnership units upon exercise of their redemption rights.
ARCs board of directors has no present intention of causing it to repurchase
any ARC common stock. ARC may issue preferred stock from time to time, in one
or more series, as authorized by its board of directors without the need for
stockholder approval. We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or the
agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and do not intend to
do so. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to be
consistent with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code to qualify as a
REIT unless, because of circumstances or changes in the Internal Revenue Code
(or the regulations promulgated thereunder), the board of directors determines
that it is no longer in ARCs best interest to continue to have us qualify as a
REIT. ARC intends to make investments in such a way that it will not be treated
as an investment company under the 1940 Act. ARCs policies with respect to
such activities may be reviewed and modified from time to time by its directors
without notice to or the vote of the stockholders. In 2004, we acquired 8,025 common partnership units for
total cash consideration of $125,000,
and in 2005 through June 30, we acquired 142,077 common partnership units for total cash consideration of $1,836,000. Generally speaking, ARC makes available to its
stockholders, and causes the Partnership to make available to its limited
partners, audited annual financial statements and annual reports and quarterly
unaudited financial statements. ARC is also subject to the information
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, pursuant to which ARC files
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information, including financial
statements with the SEC. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part, the Partnership will also become subject
to the same information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
$ 1,000 $ 795 11. Commitments and
Contingencies In the normal course of business, from time to time we are
involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of our
properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately F-57 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT Except as noted below, neither ARC nor
any director or executive officer of ARC owns any of, and, as of September 30,
2005, no person or entity is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of, the Partnerships outstanding common part2-go.htm',USER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 24 23:59 2005' -->
result from such legal actions,
will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. In the normal course of business,
from time to time we incur environmental obligations relating to the ownership
and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, which
may ultimately result from such environmental obligations, will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. In July 2005,
according to the terms the SeriesB PPUs, the SeriesB PPU holders requested
redemption of their units, and the Operating Partnership elected to repurchase
them with approximately $2.5 million in cash and notes payable totaling
approximately $5.0 million (see Note 3). On
September 21, 2005, ARC announced that Larry D. Willard, a member of ARCs
board of directors, had assumed the additional position of Chairman of ARCs
board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of ARC and that ARC director
James F. Kimsey had become President and Chief Operating Officer of ARC.
Mr. Scott D. Jackson, ARCs former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
had assumed the position of Vice Chairman of ARCs board of directors and would
direct ARCs sales of communities. On that
date, ARC also announced that its board of directors had authorized a $0.515625
dividend on ARCs Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and a
distribution of $0.39 per unit on the Partnerships Series C preferred
partnership units. The dividend and distribution are each payable on
October 30, 2005 to holders of record on October 15, 2005. ARCs
board of directors also eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARCs common stock
and the quarterly distribution on the Partnerships common partnership units,
in each case, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Also on
September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors authorized the sale of
approximately 79 communities in 33 markets, either at auction or
through various negotiated sales. Following these sales, and assuming that all
79 communities are sold, ARC will continue to own 237 communities
that it believes meet its business plan objectives and operating strategy
objectives. In
September 2005, we amended our revolving credit mortgage facility to
extend the maturity of the facility to September 2006. As amended, the
facility bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at
September 30, 2005). See Description of Other IndebtednessRevolving
Credit Mortgage Facility Due 2006 for a further discussion of this amendment. Effective
October 14, 2005, two indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of the Partnership
amended the two-year, $75 million secured revolving credit facility,
raising the commitment amount to $150 million, increasing the borrowing
rate from 55% of the net book value of eligible collateral to 65%, and
increasing the interest rate from 3.25% over one-month LIBOR to 4.125% over
one-month LIBOR. F-58 We operate in three business
segments which are based on the nature of business in each segmentreal estate,
retail home sales, and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment
information is shown below (in thousands). Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 2005 2004 2005 2004 Total revenue Real
estate $ 56,787 $ 52,998 $ 113,138 Owner Number Percentage $ 95,160 Retail
home sales Eugene Mercy, Jr.(1)(2) 128,059 6.95 % J.
Markham Green(1)(3) 34,871 1.89 % ARC directors and officers as a group 162,930 8.84 % (1) Except
as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address for each executive
officer is 600 Grant Street, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80203. (2) Units
beneficially owned consist of 128,059 units. In addition, the Mercy Foundation,
of which Mr. Mercy is a trustee, owns 26,202 units. This beneficial
ownership also includes 23,182 units held by his wife, Susan Mercy, for which
he disclaims any beneficial ownership. (3) Units
beneficially owned consist of 34,871 units. 120 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP The
following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the
Partnerships partnership agreement, does not purport to be complete and is
subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and
provisions of the partnership agreement, which is incorporated herein by
reference. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings given to them in the partnership agreement, as applicable. As used
in this section, the terms we, us, our, the Partnership refer to the
Partnership and not to any of its subsidiaries. The term ARC refers to
Affordable Residential Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries. General; Management of the
Partnership We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 30,
1998. ARC is our sole general partner. Pursuant to our partnership agreement,
as our sole general partner, ARC has, subject to certain protective rights of
limited partners described below, full, exclusive and complete responsibility
and discretion in our management and control, including the ability to cause us
to enter into certain major transactions including a merger or a sale of
substantially all of our assets. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC may
not be removed as our general partner by our other partners, with or without
cause, without ARCs consent. Our limited partners expressly acknowledged that ARC, as
our general partner, is acting for our benefit, the limited partners and ARCs
stockholders collectively. ARC is under no obligation to give priority to the
separate interests of the limited partners or its stockholders in deciding
whether to cause us to take or decline to take any actions. Limited Liability of Limited
Partners The Delaware statute under which we have been formed
provides that limited partners are not personally liable to third parties for
the obligations of their partnership unless the limited partner is also a
general partner, causes a third party to reasonably believe that the limited
partner is a general partner in the partnership or participates in the business
and control of the partnership. Our partnership agreement also provides that
generally no limited partner has any right to participate in or exercise
control or management power over our affairs. Management Liability and
Indemnification ARC, as our general partner, and its directors and officers
are not liable to us for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not
derived resulting from errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any
act or omission, so long as ARC acted in good faith. The partnership agreement
provides for indemnification of ARC, any of its officers or directors or the
Partnership and other persons as ARC may designate from and against all losses,
claims, damages, liabilities, expenses, fines, settlements and other amounts
incurred in connection with any actions relating to our operations, as set
forth in the partnership agreement (subject to the exceptions described below
under Fiduciary Responsibilities). ARCs directors and officers have duties under applicable
Maryland law to manage us in a manner consistent with the bpt;width:34.0pt;">
18,292 2,082 26,283 2,793 Finance
and insurance 563 32 750 94 Corporate
and other 2 17 9 $ 75,644 $ 55,112 $ 140,188 $ 98,056 Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and
real estate taxes Real
estate $ 24,449 $ 21,706 $ 49,061 $ 37,624 Retail
home sales 19,046 3,101 29,903 3,985 Finance
and insurance 1,124 162 1,552 331 Corporate
and other 132 121 judgment or mistakes of fact or law
or of any act or omission if ARC or its director or officer acted in good faith.
In addition, we are required to indemnify ARC, its affiliates and their
respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages,
liabilities, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by ARC or
the other persons in connection with any actions relating to our operations,
provided that we will not indemnify for willful misconduct or a knowing
violation of the law or any transaction for which the person received an
improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the
partnership agreement. Our partnership agreement prohibits
ARC from entering into or conducting business other than in connection with: · the ownership, acquisition or disposition of its
partnership inteottom" style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">
44 267 128
· the management of our business; · ARCs operations as a reporting company under the Exchange
Act; · ARCs operations as a REIT; · the offering, sale, syndication, private placement or
public offering of stock, bonds, securities or other interests; · financing or refinancing of any type related to us or our
assets or activities; · any of the foregoing activities as they relate to a
subsidiary of the Partnership or of ARC; and · such activities as are incidental thereto. In addition, ARC may not own any assets or take title to
assets (other than temporarily in connection with an acquisition prior to
contributing such assets to the Partnership) other than interests in its
subsidiaries and subsidiaries of the Partnership, its general partnership
interests and such cash and cash equivalents, bank accounts or similar
instruments or accounts as ARC deems reasonably necessary, taking into account,
among other things, the requirements necessary for ARC to carry out its
responsibilities contemplated under our partnership agreement, its charter and
to qualify as a REIT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if ARC acquires assets in
its own name and owns property other than through the Partnership, the partners
have agreed to negotiate in good faith to amend the partnership agreement to reflect
such activities and the direct ownership of assets by ARC. ARC and any of its affiliates are entitled to acquire our
partnership units and to exercise all rights of a limited partner relating to
such units. Restrictions on Affiliate
Transactions ARC and its affiliates are generally prohibited from
selling or conveying any property to the Partnership except pursuant to
transactions that are determined by ARC in good faith to be fair and
reasonable. Outside Activities of Limited
Partners Subject to any agreements entered into by a limited partner
with ARC, the Partnership or a subsidiary (including, without limitation, any
employment agreement), any limited partner and its affiliates shall be entitled
to have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to
those relating to us, including business interests and activities that are in
direct or indirect competition with us or that are enhanced by our activities. Neither
we nor any partner shall have any rights in any business ventures of any
limited partner pursuant to our partnership agreement. No limited partner or
any other person shall have any obligation pursuant to our partnership
agreement, subject to any other agreements entered into by 122 such person with ARC, the
Partnership or a subsidiary, to offer any interest in any such business
ventures to us or any other person. Our partnership agreement provides that holders of our
partnership units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available
cash (i) first, with respect to any partnership units that are entitled to
any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class of
unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their respective
percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any partnership
units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance
with the rights of such class of unit (and, within such class, pro rata in
accordance with their respective percentage interests). Allocations of Net Income and Net
Loss Our net income and net loss are determined and allocated
with respect to each fiscal year as of the end of the year. Except as otherwise
provided in our partnership agreement, an allocation of a share of net income
or net loss is treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of
income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in computing net
income or net loss. Except as otherwise provided in our partnership agreement,
net income and net loss are allocated to the holders of partnership units
holding the same class of units in accordance with their respective percentage
interests in the class at the end of each fiscal year. The partnership
agreement contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply with
certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements of Treasury
Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b) and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise
provided in the partnership agreement, for income tax purposes under the
Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, each item of income, gain,
loss and deduction is allocated among our limited partners in the same manner
as its correlative item of book income, gain, loss or deduction is allocated
pursuant to our partnership agreement. There will be no regularly scheduled meetings of limited
partners. Meetings of our partners may be called by our general partner, ARC,
and will be called upon the written request to ARC of limited partners holding
more than 50% of our outstanding common partnership units. After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of
partnership units, each of our limited partners and certain transferees will
have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our
partnership agreement, to require ARC to redeem all or a portion of the common
partnership units held by the party in exchange for a cash amount equal to the
value of our partnership units. On or before the close of business on the fifth
business day after ARC receives a notice of redemption, ARC may, in its sole
and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of ARCs
common stock imposed under ARCs charter and the transfer restrictions and
other limitations thereof, elect to acquire some or all of the tendered common
partnership units from the tendering party in exchange for shares of ARCs
common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of ARCs common stock for
each common partnership unit (subject to antidilution adjustments provided in
the partnership agreement). It is ARCs current intention to exercise this
right in connection with any redemption of partnership units. Each limited
partner may effect a redemption of partnership units only once in each fiscal
quarter, unless otherwise permitted by ARC, in its sole and absolute
discretion, and may not effect a redemption for less than 250 partnership
units. 123 Transferability of Partnership
Units In general, ARC may not voluntarily withdraw from the
Partnership or transfer its interest in us unless the limited partners consent
by approval of a majority in interest or immediately after a merger of ARC into
another entity and substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity,
excluding the general partnership interest held by ARC, are contributed to the
partnership as a capital contribution in exchange for partnership units. With
certain limited exceptions, the limited partners may not transfer their
interests in us, in whole or in part, without ARCs written consent, which
consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. No partnership unit that is
paired with shares of ARCs special voting stock may be transferred unless
accompanied by such shares of special voting stock and transferred as a unit. As
a result, transfer of partnership units that are paired with shares of special
voting stock also will be subject to the restrictions on transfer of special
voting stock contained in ARCs charter. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, upon the issuance of
ARC stock other than in connection with a redemption of partnership units, ARC
will generally be obligated to contribute the cash proceeds or other
consideration received from the issuance to the Partnership in exchange for, in
the case of common stock, common partnership units, or in the case of an
issuance of preferred stock, preferred partnership units with designations,
preferences and other rights, terms and provisions that are substantially the
same as the designations, preferences and other rights, terms and provisions of
the preferred stock. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, ARC is our tax
matters partner. Accordingly, ARC has the authority to handle tax audits and to
make tax elections under the Internal Revenue Code on our behalf. The Partnership has perpetual
existence, unless dissolved upon: · our bankruptcy, judicial dissolution or withdrawal (unless,
in the case of a withdrawal, a majority-in-interest of the
remaining limited partners agree to continue the partnership and to the
appointment of a successor general partner); · the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all
of our assets; · redemption (or acquisition by ARC) of all partnership units
other than units held by us; or · an election by ARC in its capacity as our sole general
partner. Resale Registration Statement for
the Limited Partners of the Partnership Pursuant to the partnership agreement, ARC maintains a
registration statement registering the resale by the limited partners of the
Partnership of any of ARCs securities issued to the limited partners upon a
redemption of their partnership units. ARC will use all reasonable efforts to
keep any shelf registration statement effective until the third anniversary of
the date on which the registratnt> $ 44,751 $ 25,013 $ 80,783 $ 42,068 Net segment income(a) Real
estate $ 32,338 In connection with ARCs reorganization, the limited
partners of the Partnership also were granted piggyback registration rights
in connection with certain registered offerings of ARCs securities. These
piggyback registration rights will terminate when the resale shelf registration
statement described in the preceding paragraph becomes effective under the 1933
Act. 124 The
following description, which summarizes certain terms and provisions of the
notes and the indenture, does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the actual terms and provisions of
the notes and the indenture, which are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to
them in the notes or the indenture, as applicable. As used in this section, the
terms we, us, our, the Partnership refer to the Partnership and not to
any of its subsidiaries. The term ARC refers to Affordable Residential
Communities Inc. and not any of its subsidiaries. We have issued $96,600,000 million aggregate principal
amount of notes, and the notes are limited to the aggregate principal amount of
$100,000,000. We issued the notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of August 9,
2005, between us, as issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The terms of the notes include those provisions contained
in the notes and the indenture and those made part of the indenture by
reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The notes are subject
to all such terms, and holders of notes are referred to the notes, the
indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. Copies of the
indenture and the form of the notes are available for inspection at the
corporate trust office of the trustee, currently located at U.S. Bank National
Association, 60 Livingston Avenue, EP-MN-WS3C, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292;
Attention: Rick Prokosch. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 71¤2% per year from and
including August 9, 2005 or the most recent interest payment date to which
interest has been paid or provided for, and is payable semi-annually in
arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Interest will be
paid to each registered holder at the close of business on the February 1
or August 1 (whether or not a business day in New York City) immediately
preceding the applicable interest payment date, each of which we refer to as a
record date. Interest on the notes is computed on the basis of a 360-day year
consisting of twelve 30-day months. In addition, we will pay additional interest on the notes
under the circumstances described below under Registration Rights. The notes will mature on August 15, 2025 and will be
paid against presentation and surrender thereof at the corporate trust office
of the trustee unless (1) earlier redeemed by us at our option or
repurchased by us at a holders option at certain times as described under Provisional
Redemption of the Notes at Our Option, Repurchase at Option of Holders on
Certain Dates or Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change
below or (2) exchanged at a holders option as permitted under Exchange Rights below. We are not
required to maintain a sinking fund for the repayment of the notes. The notes were issued only in fully registered, book-entry
form, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, except under the
limited circumstances described below under Book-Entry System. If any interest payment date, stated maturity date,
redemption date or repurchase date is not a business day in New York City, the
payment otherwise required to be made on such date will be made on the next
such business day without any additional payment as a result of such delay. All
payments will be made in U.S. dollars. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the
Partnership and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured
indebtedness. However, the notes are effectively subordinated to our mortgages
and 125 other secured indebtedness (to the
extent of the value of the collateral securing the same) and to all preferred
equity and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries. As
of June 30, 2005 we had outstanding $25.8 million of senior unsecured
indebtedness and $1,063.2 million of secured indebtedness and our
consolidated subsidiaries had outstanding an aggregate of $59.1 million of
other liabilities. The indenture governing the notes does not prohibit us or
any of our affiliates or subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness or
issuing preferred equity in the future. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
OfferingThe notes are effectively subordinated to our existing and future
secured indebtedness and The notes are effectively subordinated to
liabilities of our subsidiaries. Subject to
the restrictions on ownership of ARC common stock and the conditions described
below, holders may exchange at any time on or prior to maturity or redemption
any outstanding notes (or $1,000 portions thereof) into shares of ARC common
stock initially at an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC common stock
per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial exchange price
of $14.31 per ARC common share). The exchange rate and the equivalent exchange
price in effect at any given time are referred to in this prospectus as the exchange
rate and the exchange price, respectively, and will be subject to adjustment
as described herein. Holders may exchange notes only in denominations of $1,000
and whole multiples of $1,000. If we call notes for redemption, you may
exchange the notes only until the close of business on the business day
immediately preceding the redemption date unless we fail to pay the redemption
price. Upon
exchange of a note, a holder will not receive any cash payment of interest,
subject to certain exceptions, and we will not adjust the exchange rate to
account for accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of
notes at the close of business on a record date for an interest payment will
receive payment of interest payable on the corresponding interest payment date
notwithstanding the exchange of such notes at any time after the close of
business on the applicable regular record date. Notes tendered for exchange by
a holder after the close of business on any record date for an interest payment
and on or prior to the corresponding interest payment date must be accompanied
by payment of an amount equal to the interest that the holder is to receive on
the notes; provided, however, that no such payment will be made (1) if we
have specified a redemption date that is after such record date and on or prior
to such interest payment date or (2) with respect to overdue interest, if
any overdue interest exists at the time of exchange with respect to such notes. If a holder
exchanges notes, we will pay any documentary, stamp or similar issue or
transfer tax due on the issuance of shares of ARC common stock upon the
exchange, if any, unless the tax is due because the holder requests the shares
to be issued or delivered to a person other than the holder, in which case the
holder will pay that tax prior to receipt of such shares. A holder
wishing to exercise its exchange rights must deliver an irrevocable duly
completed exchange notice to the exchange agent. Holders may obtain copies of
the required form of the exch.0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:left;">$ 31,292 $ 64,077 $ 57,536 Retail
home sales (754 ) (1,019 ) (3,620 ) (1,192 ) Finance
and insurance (561 )ange notice from the exchange agent. A
certificate, or a book-entry transfer through DTC, for the number of shares of
ARC common stock for which any notes are exchanged, together with a cash
payment for any fractional shares, will be delivered through the exchange agent
as soon as practicable, but within the time periods specified below, following
the exchange date (subject to our ability to elect to deliver cash, or a
combination of cash and shares of ARC common stock). The trustee will initially
act as the exchange agent. In lieu of delivery of shares of ARC common stock upon all
or any portion of the exchanged notes, we may elect to pay holders surrendering
notes for exchange an amount in cash per note (or a portion of a note) equal to
the average closing price of ARC common stock over the five trading day period
starting on and including the third trading day following the exchange date
multiplied by the exchange rate in effect on the exchange date (or portion of
the exchange rate applicable to a portion of a note if a combination of 126 ARC common stock and cash is to be
delivered). We will inform such holders through the trustee no later than two
business days following the exchange date of our election to deliver shares of
ARC common stock, to pay cash in lieu of delivery of the shares or to deliver a
combination of ARC common stock and cash. If we elect to deliver solely shares
of ARC common stock, these will be delivered through the exchange agent no
later than the third business day following the exchange date. If we elect to
deliver a combination of shares of ARC common stock and cash or to pay all of
such payment in cash, such delivery and payment will be made to holders
surrendering notes no later than the tenth business day following the
applicable exchange date. The closing price of ARC common stock on any trading day
means the reported last sale price per share (or, if no last sale price is
reported, the average of the bid and ask prices per share or, if more than one
in either case, the average of the average bid and the average ask prices per
share) on such date reported by the New York Stock Exchange or, if ARC common
stock is not quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported by the
principal national securities exchange or quotation system on which ARC common
stock is then listed or otherwise as provided in the indenture. If a holder has already delivered a repurchase notice as
described under either Repurchase at Option of Holders on Certain Dates or Repurchase
at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change, with respect to a note, that
holder may not tender that note for exchange until the holder has properly
withdrawn the repurchase notice. Upon surrender of a note for exchange, the holder shall
deliver to us cash equal to the amount that we are required to deduct and
withhold under applicable law in connection with such exchange; provided, however, that if the holder does
not deliver such cash, we may (130 ) (802 ) (237 ) Corporate
and other (130 ) The initial exchange rate will be adjusted for certain
events, including: (1) the issuance of ARC common
stock as a dividend or distribution on ARC common stock; (2) subdivisions and
combinations of ARC common stock; (3) the issuance to all holders
of ARC common stock of rights or warrants entitling them to purchase ARC common
stock (or securities exchangeable into ARC common stock) at less than (or
having an exchange price per share less than) the current market price of ARC
common stock; (4) the dividend or other
distribution to all holders of ARC common stock or shares of ARC capital stock
(other than common stock) of evidences ofndowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">
(44 ) (250 ) (119 ) $ 30,893 $ 30,099 $ (5) dividends or other
distributions consisting exclusively of cash to all holders of ARC common stock
in excess of $0.1875 per share in each fiscal quarter (the dividend threshold
amount); the dividend threshold amount is subject to adjustment as a result of
the same events giving rise to an adjustment to the exchange rate, provided
that no adjustment will be made to the dividend threshold amount as a result of
any event described in this clause (5); and
59,405 $ 55,988 Property
management expense $ 2,494 $ 1,600 $ 4,759 $ 3,054 General
and administrative expense $ 6,259 $ 4,304 $ 127 (6) payments to holders of ARC
common stock in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer for ARC common
stock by ARC or any of its subsidiaries to the extent that the cash and fair
market value of any other consideration included in the payment per share
exceeds the closing price of ARC common stock on the trading day following the
last date on which tenders or exchanges may be made pursuant to such tender
offer or exchange offer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an
adjustment to the exchange rate pursuant to clauses (5) or (6) above,
in no event will the exchange rate exceed 82.1018 shares of ARC common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment pursuant to
clauses (1) through (4) above. No adjustment in the exchange rate will be required unless
such adjustment would require a change of at least one percent in the exchange
rate then in effect at such time. Any adjustment that would otherwise be
required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any
subsequent adjustment. Except as stated above, the exchange rate will not be
adjusted for the issuance of ARC common stock or any securities exchangeable
into or exchangeable for ARC common stock or carrying the right to purchase any
of the foregoing. We will not make any adjustment if holders of notes are entitled
to participate in the transactions described above. In the case of: · any reclassification or change of ARC common stock (other
than changes resulting from a subdivie:10.0pt;">11,618 $ 19,099 IPO
related costs $ $ $ 4,417 Early
termination of debt $ $
· a consolidation, merger or combination involving ARC or a
sale or conveyance to another corporation of all or substantially all of ARCs
property and assets, in each case as a result of which
holders of ARC common stock are entitled to receive stock, other securities,
other property or assets (including cash or any combination thereof) with
respect to or in exchange for ARC common stock, holders of notes will be
entitled thereafter to exchange their notes into the kind and amount of shares
of stock, other securities or other property or assets (including cash or any
combination thereof) which they would have owned or been entitled to receive
upon such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination, sale or
conveyance had such notes been exchanged into ARC common stock immediately
prior to such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, combination,
sale or conveyance. In the event holders of ARC common stock have the
opportunity to elect the form of consideration to be received in a
reclassification, change, consolidation, merger combination, sale or
conveyance, we will make adequate provision whereby the holders of the notes
shall have the opportunity, on a timely basis, to determine the form of
consideration into which all of the notes, treated as a single class, shall be
exchangeable. Such determination shall be based on the blended, weighted
average of elections made by holders of the notes who participate in such
determination and shall be subject to any limitations to which all of the
holders of ARC common stock are subject to, such as pro-rata reductions
applicable to any portion of the consideration payable. We may not become a
party to any such transaction unless its terms are consistent with the
foregoing. If a taxable distribution to holders of ARC common stock or
other transaction occurs which results in any adjustment of the exchange price,
the holders of notes may, in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received
a distribution subject to U.S. income tax as a dividend. In certain other
circumstances, the absence of an adjustment may result in a taxable dividend to
the holders of common stostyle="font-size:1.0pt;"> $ 13,427 We may from time to time, to the extent permitted by law,
reduce the exchange price of the notes by any amount for any period of at least
20 days. In that case we will give at least 15 days notice of such
decrease. 128 Determination
of Make Whole Premium If a
transaction described in the first, second or fourth bullet of the definition
of change in control (as set forth under Repurchase at Option of Holders upon
a Fundamental Change) occurs prior to August 20, 2015 and a holder elects
to exchange its notes in connection with such transaction, we will increase the
applicable exchange rate for the notes surrendered for exchange by a number of
additional ARC common shares (the additional change in control shares), as
described below. An exchange of notes will be deemed for these purposes to be in
connection with such a change in control transaction if the notice of exchange
of the notes is received by the exchange agent from and including the date that
is 15 business days prior to the anticipated effective date of the change in
control up to and including the business day prior to the repurchase date as
described under Repurchase at Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change. The number
of additional change in control shares will be determined by reference to the
table below and is based on the date on which such change in control
transaction becomes effective (the effective date) and the price (the stock
price) paid per ARC common share in such transaction. If the holders of ARC
common shares receive only cash in the change in control transaction, the stock
price shall be the cash amount paid per ARC common share. Otherwise, the stock
price shall be the average of the closing sale prices of ARC common shares on
the ten consecutive trading days up to but excluding the effective date. The stock
prices set forth in the first row of the table (i.e., the column headers) will be adjusted as of any date on
which the exchange rate of the notes is adjusted. The adjusted stock prices
will equal the stock prices applicable immediately prior to such adjustment
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the exchange rate
immediately prior to the adjustment giving rise to the stock price adjustment
and the denominator of which is the exchange rate as so adjusted. In addition,
the number of additional change in control shares will be subject to adjustment
in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under Exchange
Rate Adjustments. The following table sets forth the
stock price and number of additional change in control shares of ARC common
stock to be received per $1,000 principal amount of notes: Stock Price Effective Date Date 8/9/2005 8/20/2006 8/20/2007 8/20/2008 8/20/2009 8/20/2010 8/20/2011 8/20/2012 8/20/2013 8/20/2014 8/20/2015 $12.18 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 12.2206 0.0000 13.00 10.2161 9.8807 9.5000 9.1194 Interest expense
8.6301 7.9468 7.4436 7.0419 7.0419 Real
estate $ 15,008 $ 12,107 $ 29,382 $ 0.0000 24,476 Retail home
sales 588 33 888 (31 ) Corporate
and other 948 589 1,547 2,764 $ 16,544 $ 12,729 $ 31,817 $ 27,209 (a) Net
segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations,
real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales,
finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the
performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property
management, general and administrative, IPO related costs, depreciation,
amortization, early termination of debt, impairment charges, interest expense
and the effect of discontinued operations. F-59 14.00 8.3749 8.0136 7.6469 7.2499 6.7830 6.2169 5.5323 4.6956 3.7746 2.7440 0.0000 15.00 6.9156 6.4409 6.0190 5.6616 5.2984 4.9353 4.4068 3.6785 2.7276 1.4954 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 2005 2004 2005 2004 Amortization
expense $ 3,256 $ 2,530 $ 6,791 $ 4,660 Depreciation
expense Real
estate $ 18,842 $ 14,904 $ 35,212 $ 27,591 Retail
home sales 9 13 15 19 Finance
and insurance 2
0.0000 16.00 5.9083 5.2726 2 3 3 4.6812 4.1705 3.7891 3.3968 3.0046 2.6123 2.2201 1.2536 0.0000 17.00 5.2941 4.5418 3.7839 3.0444 2.3763 2.0309 1.9261 1.6038 1.2814 0.9591 0.0000 18.00 5.0000 4.1667 Corporate
and other 115 (207 ) 234 (121
3.2881 2.4091 1.4853 0.4825 0.4647 ) $ 18,968 $ 14,712 $ 0.3656 0.2372 0.0000 20.00 4.5000 3.7500
35,464 $ 27,492 Interest
income $ (277 ) $ (450 ) $ 2.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 &nbs;">
(660 ) $ (792 ) Loss from
continuing operations $ (16,351 3.6000 3.0000 2.2800 1.6000 0.8000 ) $ (5,326 ) $ (30,384 ) $ (42,578 ) Income
from discontinued operations $ 72 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30.00 3.0000 2.5000 1.9000 1.3333 0.6667 $ 343 $ 1,000 $ 795 Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations $ 52 $ $ (678 ) $ Net loss 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.00 2.2500 1.8750 1.4250 1.0000 0.5000
$ (16,227 ) $ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 50.00 1.8000 1.5000 1.1400 0.8000 0.4000 0.0000 (4,983 ) $ (30,062 ) $ (41,783 ) Preferred
unit distributions $ (2,971 ) $ (2,578 ) $ (5,942 ) $ (3,810 ) Net loss attributable to partners $ (19,198 ) $ (7,561 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 June 30, December 31, Identifiable assets 129 The exact stock prices and effective dates may not be set
forth in the table, in which case: (1) if the stock price is between two stock price amounts in
the table or the effective date is between two dates in the table, the
additional change in control shares will be determined by straight-line
interpolation between the number of additional change in control shares set
forth for the higher and lower stock price amounts and the two dates, as
applicable, based on a 365-day year; (2) if the stock price is in excess of $50.00 per ARC common
share (subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be
issued upon exchange; and (3) if the stock price is less than $12.18 per ARC common share
(subject to adjustment), no additional change in control shares will be issued
upon exchange. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in no event will the total number of ARC common shares issuable
upon exchange exceed 82.1018 per $1,000 principal amount of notes, subject to
adjustment in the same manner as the exchange rate as set forth above under Exchange
Rate Adjustments. Our obligation to deliver the additional change in control
shares could be considered a penalty, in which case the enforceability thereof
would be subject to general principles of reasonableness of economic remedies. Provisional Redemption of the Notes
at Our Option We will not
have the right to redeem any notes prior to August 20, 2010. Beginning
on August 20, 2010, we may redeem the notes in whole or in part for cash
at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on
the notes to the redemption date if the closing price of the common stock has
exceeded 130% of the exchange price for at least 20 trading days in any
consecutive 30-day trading period. The exchange
price as of any day will equal $1,000 divided by the exchange rate. If we
redeem the notes, we will make an additional payment equal to the total value
of the aggregate amount of the interest otherwise payable on the notes from the
last day through which interest was paid on the notes through the date of
redemption. We must make these payments on all notes called for redemption,
including notes exchanged after the date we mailed the notice. We will
give at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, notice of
redemption by mail to holders of notes. Notes or portions of notes called for
redemption will be exchangeable by the holder until the close of business on
the business day prior to the redemption date. If we do not redeem all of the notes, the trustee will
select the notes to be redeemed in principal amount of $1,000 or integral
multiples thereof, by lot or on a pro rata basis. If any notes are to be
redeemed in part only, we will issue a new note or notes with a principal
amount equal to the unredeemed principal portion thereof. If a portion of your
notes is selected for partial redemption and you exchange a portion of your
notes, the exchanged portion will be deemed to be taken from the portion
selected for redemption. Repurchase at Option of Holders on
Certain Dates Holders of
notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part (in
principal amounts of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof) on August 15,
2010, August 15, 2015 and August 15, 2020 for cash equal to 100% of
the Real
estate $ 1,721,766 $ 1,738,226 Retail
home sales 55,510 30,053 Finance
and insurance 13,028 735 Corporate
and other 14,482 44,218 $ 1,804,786 Holders
must deliver a written repurchase notice to the paying agent, which initially
is the trustee, during the period beginning at any time from the opening of
business on the date that is 20 days prior to the repurchase date until
the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. Our
repurchase obligation will be subject to certain additional conditions. On or before the 20th day prior to each repurchase date, we
will provide to the trustee, any paying agent and to all holders of the notes,
and to beneficial owners as required by applicable law, a notice stating, among
other things: · the amount of the repurchase
price; and · the procedures that holders
must follow to require us to repurchase their notes. We will
also disseminate a press release through Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
or Bloomberg Business News containing the information specified in such notice
or publish that information in a newspaper of general circulation in New York
City or on ARCs website, or through such other public medium as we deem
appropriate at that time. A holders notice electing to require us to repurchase
notes must specify: · that such notice complies
with appropriate procedures of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC; · the portion of the principal
amount of notes to be repurchased, which must be $1,000 or an integral multiple
of $1,000; and · that the notes are to be
repurchased by us pursuant to the applicable provisions of the notes. Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice in whole or in
part by a written notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to
the close of business on the second business day prior to the repurchase date. The
notice of withdrawal must specify: · the principal amount of
notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn; · that the withdrawal notice
complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in
book-entry form; and · the principal amount of
notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice. Holders electing
to require us to repurchase notes must either effect book-entry transfer of
notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures or
deliver the notes in certificated form, together with necessary endorsements,
to the paying agent prior to the repurchase date to receive payment of the
repurchase price on the repurchase date. We will pay the repurchase price
within two business days after any such transfer or delivery on or after the
repurchase date. If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the
repurchase price of the notes on the business date following the repurchase
date, then immediately after the repurchase date: · such notes will cease to be
outstanding; · interest on such notes will
cease to accrue; and · all rights of holders of
such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price. In connection with any repurchase offer, we will, if
required, comply with the provisions of Rule 13e-4, Rule 14e-1,
and any other tender offer rules under the Exchange Act which may then be
applicable; and file a Schedule TO or any other required schedule under
the Exchange Act. 131 Repurchase at Option of Holders
upon a Fundamental Change If a
fundamental change occurs at any time prior to maturity, holders of notes may
require us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100%
of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus unpaid interest, if
any, accrued to the repurchase date. Within
20 days after the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are obligated to
give to the holders of the notes notice of the fundamental change and of the
repurchase right arising as a result of the fundamental change and the
repurchase date (which may be no earlier than 15 days and no later than
30 days after the date of such notice). We must also deliver a copy of
this notice to the trustee. We will also disseminate a press release through
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. or Bloomberg Business News announcing
the occurrence of the fundamental change or publish that information in a
newspaper of general circulation in New York City or on ARCs website, or
through such other public medium as we deem appropriate at that time. To exercise
its repurchase right, a holder of notes must deliver written notice of such
holders exercise of its repurchase right to the trustee prior to the close of
business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. Holders may withdraw any repurchase notice by a written
notice of withdrawal delivered to the paying agent prior to the close of
business on the fifth business day prior to the repurchase date. If a holder of
notes delivers a repurchase notice, it may not thereafter surrender such notes
for exchange unless such repurchase notice is withdrawn as permitted below. The
notice of withdrawal must specify: · the principal amount of
notes in respect of which the repurchase notice is being withdrawn; · that the withdrawal notice
complies with appropriate DTC procedures with respect to all withdrawn notes in
book-entry form; and · the principal amount of
notes, if any, that remains subject to the repurchase notice. Holders
electing to require us to repurchase notes must effect book-entry transfer of
notes in book-entry form in compliance with appropriate DTC procedures. We
will pay the repurchase price within two business days after any such transfer
on or after the repurchase date. If the paying agent holds funds sufficient to pay the
repurchase price of the notes on the repurchase date, then on and after such
date: · such notes will cease to be
outstanding; · interest on such notes will
cease to accrue; and
$ 1,813,232 Notes payable Real
estate $ 1,007,579 $ 972,575 A fundamental
change will be deemed to occur upon a change in control or a termination of
trading. A change in control will be deemed to have occurred at
such time after the original issuance of the notes when the following has
occurred: · any person or group (as
such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act)
acquires the beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a purchase,
merger or other acquisition transacle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">
Retail
home sales 43,945 27,999 Finance
and insurance 9,369 Corporate
and other 28,111 132 · we or ARC consolidates with,
or merges with or into, another person or conveys, transfers, leases or
otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets to any person, or
any person consolidates with or merges with or into ARC or us, other than: · any transaction (A) that
does not result in any reclassification, exchange, or cancellation of
outstanding shares of ARCs capital stock or our partnership units, as the case
may be, and (B) pursuant to which holders of ARCs capital stock or our
partnership units, as applicable, immediately prior to the transaction have the
entitlement to exercise, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total
voting power of all shares of ARC capital stock entitled to vote generally in
the election of directors of the continuing or surviving person immediately
after the transaction or 50% of the voting power of our partnership units as
the case may be; · any merger solely for the
purpose of changing ARCs or our jurisdiction of formation and resulting in a
reclassification, exchange or exchange of outstanding shares of common stock
solely into shares of common stock of the surviving entity; · during any consecutive
two-year period, individuals who at the beginning of that two-year period
constituted the board of directors of ARC (together with any new directors
whose election to such board of directors, or whose nomination for election by
stockholders, was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still
in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any
reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of ARC then in
office; or · we or ARC approve a plan of
liquidation or dissolution. Beneficial
ownership will be determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3
promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. The term person includes any
syndicate or group that would be deemed to be a person under Section 13(d)(3) of
the Exchange Act. A termination
of trading is deemed to occur if ARC common stock (or other common stock into
which the notes are then exchangeable) is neither listed for trading on a U.S.
national securities exchange nor approved for trading on an established
automated over-the-counter trading market in the United States. The
definition of fundamental change includes a phrase relating to the conveyance,
transfer, lease, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
assets of the ARC or us. There is no precise established definition of the
phrase substantially all under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a
holder of notes to require us to repurchase such notes as a result of pt .0001pt;text-align:right;">1,048 $ 1,089,004 $ 1,001,622 a
conveyance, transfer, lease, or other disposition of less than all of the
assets of the ARC or us may be uncertain. F-60 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
LP Initial Costs Costs Capitalized Gross Amounts at which Carried Community Name Location Encumbrances Land Buildings and Land Buildings and Land Buildings and Total Accumulated Date of 100 Oaks Fultondale, AL $ $ 358 $ 2,030 $ $ 241 $ 358 $ 2,271 Rule 13e-4
under the Exchange Act requires the dissemination of information to
securityholders if an issuer tender offer occurs and may apply if the
repurchase option becomes available to holders of the notes. We will comply
with this rule to the extent applicable at that time. We will
comply with the provisions of any tender offer rules under the Exchange
Act that may then be applicable, and will file any schedule required under the
Exchange Act in connection with any offer by us to purchase notes at the option
of the holders of notes upon a fundamental change. In some circumstances, the
fundamental change purchase feature of the notes may make more difficult or
discourage a takeover of us and thus the removal of incumbent management. The
fundamental change purchase feature, however, is not the result of managements
knowledge of any specific effort to accumulate shares of common stock or to
obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, solicitation or
otherwise, or part of a plan by management to adopt a series of anti-takeover
provisions. Instead, the fundamental change purchase feature is the result of
negotiations between us and the initial purchasers of the notes. 133 We may, to
the extent permitted by applicable law, at any time purchase the notes in the
open market or by tender at any price or by private agreement. Any note
purchased by us (a) after the date that is two years from the latest
issuance of the notes may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be
reissued or sold or may be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation or (b) on
or prior to the date referred to in (a), will be surrendered to the trustee for
cancellation. Any notes surrendered to the trustee may not be reissued or
resold and will be canceled promptly. The
foregoing provisions would not necessarily protect holders of the notes if
highly leveraged or other transactions involving us occur that may adversely
affect holders. Our ability to repurchase notes upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change is subject to important limitations. The occurrence of a
fundamental change could cause an event of default under, or be prohibited or
limited by, the terms of indebtedness that we may incur in the future. Further,
we cannot assure you that we would have the financial resources, or would be
able to arrange financing, to pay the repurchase price for all the notes that
might be delivered by holders of notes seeking to exercise the repurchase right.
Any failure by us to repurchase the notes when required following a fundamental
change would result in an event of default under the indenture. Any such
default may, in turn, cause a default under indebtedness that we may incur in
the future. No notes may be purchased by us at the option of holders
upon the occurrence of a fundamental change if there has occurred and is
continuing an event of default with respect to the notes, other than a default
in the payment of the fundamental change purchase price with respect to the
notes. No Stockholder Rights for Holders
of Notes Holders of notes, as such, will not have any rights as
stockholders of ARC (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to
receive any dividends or other distributions on shares of ARC common stock),
except in limited circumstances described above under Exchange RightsExchange
Right Adjustments. In order to assist ARC in maintaining its qualification as
a REIT for federal income tax purposes, ownership by any person of more than
7.3% of outstanding ARC common stock is restricted, unless waived or modified
by ARCs board of directors. See Description of ARC Capital Stock and Our
Partnership UnitsARCs Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer. Calculations
in Respect of the Notes Except as explicitly specified otherwise herein, we will be
responsible for making all calculations required under the notes. These
calculations include, but are not limited to, determinations of the exchange
price and exchange rate applicable to the notes. We will make all these
calculations in good faith and, absent manifest error, our calculations will be
final and binding on holders of the notes. We will provide a schedule of our
calculations to the trustee, and the trustee is entitled to rely upon the
accuracy of our calculations without independent verification. The trustee will
forward our calculations to any holder of notes upon the request. The Partnership may consolidate with, or sell, lease or convey
all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or into, any other
entity, provided that the following conditions are met: · we shall be the continuing
entity, or the successor entity (if other than the Partnership) formed by or
resulting from any consolidation or merger or which shall have received the
transfer of assets 134 shall expressly assume payment of the principal of and
interest on all of the notes and the due and punctual performance and
observance of all of the covenants and conditions in the indenture; · if as a result of such
transaction the notes become convertible or exchangeable into common stock or
other securities issued by a third party, such third party fully and
unconditionally guarantees all obligations under the notes and the indenture; · immediately after giving
effect to the transaction, no Event of Default under the indenture, and no
event which, after notice or the lapse of time, or both, would become an Event
of Default, shall have occurred and be continuing; and · an officers certificate and legal opinion covering these
conditions shall be delivered to the trustee. The following are events of default under the indenture: · default in the payment of
any principal amount or any redemption price, purchase price, or fundamental
change purchase price due with respect to the notes, when the same becomes due
and payable; · default in payment of any
interest (including liquidated damages) under the notes, which default
continues for 30 days; · default in the delivery when
due of shares of ARC common stock or any cash in lieu of such shares payable
upon exchange with respect to the notes, including any make whole premium,
which default continues for 15 days; · our failure to comply with
any of our other agreements in the notes or the indenture upon our receipt of
notice of such default from the trustee or from holders of not less than 25% in
aggregate principal amount of the noteak-after:avoid;text-align:right;">$ 2,628 $ 63 Feb-04 Alafia
Riverfront Riverview, FL 865 312 1,830 s, and the failure to cure (or obtain a
waiver of) such default within 30 days after receipt of such notice; · default in the payment of
principal when due or resulting in acceleration of other indebtedness of us or
any significant subsidiary for borrowed money where the aggregate principal
amount with respect to which the default or acceleration has occurred exceeds
$5 million and such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled or
such indebtedness repaid within a period of 30 days after written notice
to us by the trustee or to us and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in
aggregate principal amount of the notes, provided that if any such default is
cured, waived, rescinded or annulled, then the event of default by reason
thereof would be deemed not to have occurred; and · certain events of
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization affecting us. If an event of default shall have happened and be
continuing, either the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the notes then outstanding may declare the principal of the
notes and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration
immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or
insolvency, the principal amount of the notes together with any accrued
interest through the occurrence of such event shall automatically become and be
immediately due and payable. 135 The trustee and we may amend the indenture or the notes
with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the notes then outstanding. However, the consent of the
holder of each outstanding note affected is required to: · alter the manner of
calculation or rate of accrual of interest on the note or change the time of
payment; · make the note payable in
money or securities other than that stated in the note; · change the stated maturity
of the note; · reduce the principal amount,
redemption price, purchase price or fundamental change purchase price
(including any make-whole premium payable) with respect to the note; · make any change that
adversely affects the rights of a holder to exchange the note in any material
respect; · make any change that
adversely affects the right to require us to purchase the note in any material
respect; · impair the right to
institute suit for the enforcement of any payment with respect to the note or
with respect to exchange of the note; or · change the provisions in the
indenture that relate to modifying or amending the indenture. Without the consent of any holder of notes, the trustee and
we may amend the indenture: · to evidence a successor to
us and the 343 312 2,173 2,486 63 Feb-04 Aledo Aledo, TX · to secure our obligations in
respect of the notes; · to evidence and provide the
acceptance of the appointment of a successor trustee under the indenture;
2,262 390 2,210 1,152 390 3,362 3,752 675 Oct-99 Amber Village Dallas, TX· to comply with the
requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain qualification of the
indenture under the Trust Indenture Act, as contemplated by the indenture or
otherwise; · to cure any ambiguity,
omission, defect or inconsistency in the indenture; or · to make any change that does
not adversely affect the rights of the holders of the notes in any material
respect. The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of
the outstanding notes may, on behalf of all the holders of all notes: · amend, alter or change the
terms and provisions of the agreement described below under · waive compliance by us with
restrictive provisions of the indenture, as detailed in the indenture; or · waive any past default under the indenture and its
consequences, except a default in the payment of any amount due, or in the
obligation to deliver common stock, with respect to any note or in respect of
any provision which under the indenture cannot be modified or amended without
the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected. 136 If at any time we or ARC are not subject to the reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, we will promptly furnish to the holders,
beneficial owners and prospective purchasers of the notes or underlying shares
of ARC common stock, upon their request, the information required to be delivered
pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933 to
facilitate the resale of those notes or shares pursuant to Rule 144A. We will regularly furnish to the trustee copies of ARCs
annual report to its stockholders, containing audited financial statements, and
any other financial reports which ARC furnishes to its stockholders. We may satisfy and discharge our obligations under the
indenture by delivering to the trustee for cancellation all outstanding notes
or by depositing with the trustee, the paying agent or the exchange agent, if
applicable, after the notes have become due and payable, whether at stated
maturity or any redemption date, or any purchase date, or a fundamental change
purchase date, or upon exchange or otherwise, cash or shares of common stock
(as applicable under the terms of the indenture) sufficient to pay a> 2,500 600 2,923 1,155 600 4,078 If money deposited with the trustee or paying agent for the
payment of principal of, premium, if any, or accrued and unpaid interest or
additional interest on, the notes remains unclaimed for two years, the trustee
and paying agent will pay the money back to us upon our written request. However,
the trustee and paying agent have the right to withhold paying the money back
to us until they publish in a newspaper of general circulation in New York
City, or mail to each holder, a notice stating that the money will be paid back
to us if unclaimed after a date no less than 30 days from the publication
or mailing. After the trustee or paying agent pays the money back to us,
holders of notes entitled to the money must look to us for payment as general
creditors, subject to applicable law, and all liability of the trustee and the
paying agent with respect to the money will cease. The indenture and the notes are governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the law of the State of New York. U.S. Bank
National Association is the trustee, registrar, exchange agent and paying
agent. If an Event
of Default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be required to use the
degree of care and skill of a prudent man in the conduct of his own affairs. The
trustee will become obligated to exercise any of its powers under the indenture
at the request of any of the holders of any notes only after those holders have
offered the trustee indemnity satisfactory to it. If the trustee becomes one of our creditors, it will be
subject to limitations on its rights to obtain payment of claims or to realize
on some property received for any such claim, as security or otherwise. The
trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions with us. If, however, it
acquires any conflicting interest, it must eliminate that conflict or resign. 137 In connection with the issuance of the notes, we anr:avoid;"> 4,678 408 Jul-02 Arbor Ld ARC
entered into an agreement by which we acknowledge our responsibility as sole
obligor of the notes. The agreement provides that if we are obligated to
deliver shares of ARC common stock pursuant to the indenture, ARC will issue
the required number of shares and deliver them to the exchanging noteholder. At
such time, we will issue to ARC an equal number of common partnership units. Under
the agreement, ARC has agreed not to consolidate with or merge into another
business entity or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets,
unless: · either (1) ARC is the
continuing entity in the case of a merger or consolidation or (2) the
resulting, surviving or acquiring entity, if other than ARC, is a U.S. entity
and it expressly assumes ARCs obligations under the agreement and the
indenture; · immediately after giving
effect to the transaction, no event of default under the indenture and no
circumstances which, after notice or lapse of time or both, would become an
event of default under the indenture, shall have happened and be continuing;
and · ARC has delivered to the
trustee an officers certificate and a legal opinion confirming that ARC has
complied with the indenture. No provision of the agreement may be amended, modified, or
waived without the consent of a majority in principal amount of notes then
outstanding, except that the unanimous consent of the holders of all
outstanding notes is required in order to amend, modify, or waive the
provisions the agreement that may advake Grinnell, IA 69 392 We have
issued the notes in the form of one or more global securities. The global
security has been deposited with the trustee as custodian for DTC and
registered in the name of a nominee of DTC. Except as set forth below, the
global security may be transferred, in whole and not in part, only to DTC or
another nominee of DTC. A holder of the notes will hold its beneficial
interests in the global security directly through DTC if it has an account with
DTC or indirectly through organizations that have accounts with DTC. Notes in
definitive certificated form (called certificated securities) will be issued
only in certain limited circumstances described below. DTC has advised us that it is: · a limited purpose trust
company organized under the laws of the State of New York; · a member of the Federal
Reserve System; · a clearing corporation
within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and · a clearing ath:4.9pt;">
215 69 607 676 138 We expect
that pursuant to procedures established by DTC upon the deposit of the global
security with DTC, DTC will credit, on its book-entry registration and transfer
system, the principal amount of notes represented by such global security to
the accounts of participants. The accounts to be credited shall be designated
by the initial purchasers. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global
security will be limited to participants or persons that may hold interests
through participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in the global security
will be shown on, and the transfer of those beneficial interests will be
effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to participants
interests), the participants and the indirect participants. The laws of
some jurisdictions may require that certain purchasers of securities take
physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. These limits and laws
may impair the ability to transfer or pledge beneficial interests in the global
security. Owners of
beneficial interests in global securities who desire to exchange their
interests for common stock should contact their brokers or other participants
or indirect participants through whom they hold such beneficial interests to
obtain information on procedures, including proper forms and cut-off times, for
submitting requests for exchange. So long as DTC, or its nominee, is the
registered owner or holder of a global security, DTC or its nominee, as the
case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes
represented by the global security for all purposes under the indenture and the
notes. In addition, no owner of a beneficial interest in a global security will
be able to transfer that interest except in accordance with the applicable
procedures of DTC. Except as
set forth below, an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security, will
not be entitled to have the notes represented by the global security registered
in its name, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of
certificated securities and will not be considered to be the owner or holder of
any notes under the global security. We understand that under existing industry
practice, if an owner of a beneficial interest in the global security desires
to take any action that DTC, as the holder of the global security, is entitled
to take, DTC would authorize the participants to take such action. Additionally,
in such case, the participants would authorize beneficial owners owning through
such participants to take such action or would otherwise act upon the
instructions of beneficial owners owning through them. We will
make payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest (including any
liquidated damages) on the notes represented by the global security registered
in the name of and held by DTC or its nominee to DTC or its nominee, as the
case may be, as the registered owner and holder of the global security. Neither
we, the trustee nor any paying agent will have any responsibility or liability
for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of
beneficial interests in the global security or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests. 1,460 667 5,234 5,902 Transfers
between participants in DTC will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance
with DTC rules and will be settled in same-day funds. 139 DTC has advised us that it will take any action permitted
to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction of one or more
participants to whose account the DTC interests in the global security is credited
and only in respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of notes
as to which such participant or participants has or have given such direction. However,
if DTC notifies us that it is unwilling to be a depositary for the global
security or ceases to be a clearing agency or there is an event of default
under the notes, DTC will exchange the global security for certificated
securit.0pt;">
135 Mar-04 Audora Wichita, KS 200 We and ARC
have agreed, at our expense, to file with the SEC the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part. We and ARC have agreed to use our respective
best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective as
promptly as is practicable, but in no event later than 180 days after the
earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes and to keep the
registration statement effective until such date that the holders of the notes
and the common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all
such securities immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume
limitations of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act or any successor rule thereto
or otherwise. We and ARC
have also agreed to provide to each registered holder copies of the prospectus,
notify each registered holder when the shelf registration statement has become
effective and take certain other actions as are required to permit unrestricted
resales of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon the exchange of the
notes. A holder who sells securities pursuant to the shelf registration
statement generally will be required to be named as a selling securityholder in
the related prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers and will be
bound by the provisions of the registration rights agreement that are
applicable to that holder (including certain indemnification provisions). If a
shelf registration statement covering those securities is not effective, they
may not be sold or otherwise ttd width="40" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
73 775 111 · on the 180th day
following the earliest date of original issuance of any of the notes, the shelf
registration statement has not been declared effective; · the registration statement
shall cease to be effective or fail to be usable without being succeeded within
five business days by a post-effective amendment or a report filed with the SEC
pursuant to the Exchange Act that cures the failure of the registration
statement to be effective or usable; or 140 · on the 30th day of any period that the
prospectus has been suspended as described in the preceding paragraph, such
suspension has not been terminated, (each, a registration default), additional interest as
liquidated damages will accrue on the notes, from and including the day
following the registration default to but excluding the day on which the
registration default has been cured. Liquidated damages will be paid semi-annually in arrears,
with the first semi-annual payment due on the first interest payment date, as
applicable, following the date on which such liquidated damages begin to accrue,
and will accrue at a rate per year equal to:
73 886 959 141 Feb-97 · an additional
0.25 percent of the principal amount to and including the 90th
day following such registration default; and · an additional
0.50 percent of the principal amount from and after the 91st
day following such registration default. In no event
will liquidated damages accrue at a rate per year exceeding 0.50 percent. If
a holder has exchanged some or all of its notes into common stock, the holder
will not be entitled to receive liquidated damages with respect to the
principal amount of the notes exchanged. We have
gin:0pt 0pt .0001pt 7.5pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-7.5pt;">Autumn
Forest Brown Summit, NC 1,982 692 4,187 369 692 4,557 5,248 The
specific provisions relating to the registration described above are contained
in the registration rights agreement that was entered into on the closing of
the initial offering of the notes. This summary of the registration rights
agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
registration rights agreement. 141 DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS At June 30, 2005, the
Partnership had $1,089.0 million of outstanding indebtedness. $767.2 million,
or 70%, of our total indebtedness was fixed rate and $321.8 million, or
30%, was variable rate. The following table sets forth information with respect
to the Partnerships total indebtedness at June 30, 2005, adjusted to give
effect to the original offering of the notes to the initial purchaser and the
use of proceeds therefrom. On a pro forma basis, the Partnership had $1,049.3 million
of outstanding indebtedness, $768.1 million, or 73%, of our indebtedness
was fixed rate and $281.2 million, or 27%, was variable rate. See
Affordable Residential Communities LP Selected Consolidated Historical
and Pro Forma Financial Data and Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data
for a discussion of the anticipated effect on the Partnership and ARC of the proposed
sale of up to 79 communities announced September 21, 2005 and the
sale of the notes. Amount Average Average (dollars in (in years) Long-term debt: 129 Mar-04 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2009 $ 83,067
Beaver Run Linkwood, MD 615 226 5.05 % 4 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2012 276,278 1,362 21 226 7.35 % 7 Senior
fixed rate mortgage due 2014 1,383
189,522 5.53 % 1,609 23 Jun-04 Belaire
9 Various
individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 to 2031 121,641 7.20 % Pocatello, ID 2,090 566 3,687 2 566 3,689 4,255 456 Dec-99 Bermuda
Palms Indio, CA 9 Senior
variable rate mortgage due 2006(1) 108,520 6.22 % 1 Revolving
credit mortgage facility due 2006 58,764 6.17 % 888 Trust
preferred securities due 2035 (due to ARC) 25,780
5,145 217 888 5,362 6,250 145 Feb-04 Big
Country Cheyenne, WY 6.26 % 30 Senior
Exchangeable Notes due 2025 96,600 4,518 926 7.50 % 20 Consumer
finance facility due 2008 9,369 6.18 % 3 Lease
receivable facility due 2007 42,100 10.22 % 2 Floorplan
line of credit due 2007 35,367 6.59 % 5,426 602 926 6,028 6,953 162 2 Other
loans 2,332 7.70 Feb-04 Birch
Meadows Wilton, NY 1,087
% 3 Total debt $ 1,049,340 206 1,159 606 206
6.71 % (1) The
senior variable rate mortgage due 2006 may be extended for three additional 12-month
periods at our option, and subject to certain conditions. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009
with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection
with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an
obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized by
29 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed
rate mortgage due 2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05% per annum, will
amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and will mature on March 1,
2009. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established
reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance,
capital spending (included in loan reserves) and property operating
expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The senior fixed rate
mortgage due 2009 contains customary defeasance-based prepayment
penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30, 2005,
$98.9 million was outstanding ($83.1 million on a pro forma basis) under
the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009. 142 Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2012 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 on May 2,
2002. It is an obligation of some of our special purpose real property
subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home communities. The
senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.35% per
annum, will amortize based on a 30-year amortization schedule and matures
on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have
established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real estate
taxes, insurance, capital spending and property operating expenditures. The
senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based
prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. As of June 30,
2005, $302.3 million was outstanding ($276.3 million on a pro forma
basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014 We entered into the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 on February 18,
2004 with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, in connection with the completion of ARCs
IPO and the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain of our real
property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home communities
owned by these subsidiaries. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 bears
interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year
schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the terms of the
mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged
properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and property
operating expenditures. The senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014 contains customary
defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to
maturity. As of June 30, 2005, $211.9 million was outstanding ($189.5 million
on a pro forma basis) under the senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014. Various Individual Fixed Rate Mortgages
Due 2005 Through 2031 We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in
connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at
the time of acquisition. We have refinanced one property and expect to
refinance additional properties over time. The mortgages are secured by
specific manufactured home communities and subject to early pre-payment
penalties, the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. The mortgages are
as follows: (a) Mortgages assumed and one refinanced as part
of individual property purchases. These notes total approximately
$46.7 million at June 30, 2005, mature from 2006 through 2028 and
have an average effective annual interest rate of 7.25%. (b) Mortgages assumed in conjunction with the
Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately $77.4 million at June 30,
2005, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average effective annual
interest rate of 7.06%. (c) Notes assumed
in conjunction with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately
$29.0 million at June 30, 2005, mature in 2008 and carry an average
effective annual interest rate of 7.18%. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2006 We entered into the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006
with, among other parties, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an
affiliate of the initial purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection
with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown Communities acquisition. It
is an obligation of some of our real property subsidiaries and is collateralized
by 44 manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The senior
variable rate mortgage due 2006 bears interest at a variable rate based upon a 143 spread of 3.00% over the one-month
LIBOR (6.22% at June 30, 2005) and will mature in February 2006. At
our option and subject to certain conditions, we may extend the senior variable
rate mortgage due 2006 for three additional 12-month periods. In
connection with the second and third extensions, we would be required to pay
extension fees of 0.25% and 0.375% of the outstanding principal balance,
respectively. We purchased interest rate caps to limit our interest costs in
the event of increases in the one-month LIBOR above 5.00%, and intend to
purchase such caps for any extensions, as applicable. We will incur an exit fee
equal to 0.50% of the loan amount payable upon any repayment of the principal
amount of the loan. The exit fee will be subject to reduction by an amount
equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of any first mortgage loans provided by
the lenders to refinance the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Pursuant
to the terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating
to the mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending
and property operating expenditures. We may repay the senior variable rate
mortgage due 2006 subject to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of
0.25%, the number of payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being
repaid for prepayments made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in
months 13 to 24 are subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. As of June 30,
2005, $140.5 million was outstanding ($108.5 million on a pro forma
basis) under the senior variable rate mortgage due 2006. Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility Due
2006 In September 2004, we obtained a revolving credit
mortgage facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is
an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and is secured by 33 communities that
previously secured our prior senior revolving credit facility, as well as
various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARCs IPO. Advances under
the revolving credit mortgage facility are limited by borrowing base
requirements related to the value and cash flows of the communities securing
the loan. As amended in September 2005, the revolving credit mortgage
facility bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% (6.61% at September 30, 2005) and has an extended term
through September, 2006. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing of
the facility and an additional fee of 0.5% at the amendment date and will pay
an advance feeze:7.5pt;">1,765 1,971 167 Feb-02 Trust Preferred Securities Due 2035
(Due to ARC) On March 15, 2005, we issued $25.8 million in unsecured
trust preferred securities to ARC. The $25.8 million trust preferred
securities bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25% (6.26% at June 30,
2005). Interest on the securities is paid on the 30th of March, June, September and
December of each year. We may redeem these securities on or after March 30,
2010 in whole or in part from time to time at principal amount plus accrued
interest. The securities are mandatorily redeemable on March 15, 2035 if
not redeemed sooner. Birchwood
Farms Birch Run, MI 3,064 662 3,817 340 662 4,157 4,819 113 Feb-04 Blue Ridge
MHP Conklin, NY 52 311 170 52 481 532 8 Jun-04 Blue
Valley Manhattan, KS 983 84 496 We entered
into the retail home sales and consumer finance debt facility due in 2006 with
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial
purchaser, on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs
IPO and the Hometown acquisition and amended it in April 2005 in
connection with entering into a two-year secured revolving lease receivables
credit facility (see Lease Receivables Facility below). The consumer finance
facility, as amended, has a total commitment of $125.0 million and a term
of four years. This facility is an obligation of one of our subsidiaries, and
borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing conditional
sales contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified
borrowing base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the
facility. The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of
3.00% over the one-month LIBOR 144 (6.18% at June 30, 2005). The facility includes
customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible
net worth and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all
financial covenants under the facility as of June 30, 2005. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, we paid a commitment fee of 1.00% on the
original committed amount and 0.75% of the amended committed amount and will
pay additional annual commitment fees payable on each anniversary of the
closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a number of conditions,
including certain underwriting and credit screening guidelines and the
conditions that the home must be located in one of our communities, the loan
term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section home or
15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not
exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the conditional sales contract. The availability of advances under the consumer finance
facility is subject to certain conditions that are beyond our control. Conditions
that could result in our inability to draw on these facilities include a
downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the absence of certain markets
for financing debt obligations secured by securities or mortgage loans. Funding
under this facility may also be denied if the lender determines that the value
of the assets serving as collateral would be insufficient to maintain the
required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving effect to a request for funding. The
lender can also at any time require that we prepay amounts funded or provide
additional collateral if, in its judgment, this is necessary to maintain the
75% loan-to-value ratio. As of June 30, 2005, $9.4 million was
outstanding under the consumer finance facility. Lease Receivables Facility Due 2008 On April 6,
2005, we obtained a two-year, $75.0 million secured revolving credit
facility, or the lease receivables facility, with Merrill Lynch Mortgage
Capital Inc., an affiliate of the initial purchaser of the notes, to be
used to finance the purchase of manufactured homes and for general corporate
purposes. This facility was amended and the size of the facility increased to
$150 million effective October 14,
2005. This
facility is an obligation of two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, ARC
Housing LLC and ARC HousingTX LP, or, collectively, Housing. Borrowings under
the lease receivables facility are secured by an assignment of all lease
receivables and rents, an assignment of the underlying manufactured homes and a
pledge by ARCHC LLC and ARC Housing GP LLC of 100% of the outstanding equity in
Housing. The amendment also (i) increased the limit on borrowings under the
lease receivables facility from an amount equal to approximately 55% of the net
book value of the eligible manufactured housing units owned by Housing and
located in ARCs communities, to 65%, subject to certain other applicable
borrowing base requirements, (ii)pt;width:4.9pt;">
< increased the interest rate on borrowings
under the facility from 3.25% plus one-month LIBOR to 4.125% plus one-month
LIBOR (7.985% at September 30, 2005), and (iii) extended the maturity of
the facility from March 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The fee charged by the
lender in connection with the amendment was 0.5%, or $750,000. The ability to
access funding under the amended facility is conditioned upon the satisfaction
of certain conditions precedent set forth in the amendment. Additionally, ARC Real Estate Holdings, LLC, or ARC Real
Estate, the indirect parent of Housing pledged certain additional collateral to
the lender pursuant to a security agreement which provides that ARC Real Estate
has pledged the excess cash flows of certain of its subsidiaries as additional
collateral for the facility. Floorplan
Line Of Credit Due 2007 In August 2004, we amended our floorplan line of
credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million secured by
manufactured homes in inventory. Under the amended line of credit, the lender
will advance 90% of the purchase cost of manufactured homes for the first
$40.0 million in advances, with the remaining $10.0 million in
advances made at 75% of such home costs. Repayments of borrowed amounts are due
145 upon sale or lease of the related
manufactured home. Advances under the amended line of credit will bear interest
ranging from the prime rate plus 0.75% to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging
6.59% at June 30, 2005) based on the length of time each advance has been
outstanding. Monthly curtailment payments are required for unsold homes
beginning 360 days following the purchase of the home. The required
curtailment payment will be between 3.00% and 5.00% of the homes original
invoice amount depending on the type of home and the number of months since the
homes purchase. The amended line of credit requires us to maintain a minimum
tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth
ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million,
all as defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all financial
covenants under the line of credit as of June 30, 2005. The line of credit
is subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an unused line fee of .25% per
annum and an early termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%, based on the termination
date. As of June 30, 2005, $43.9 million was outstanding ($35.4 million
on a pro forma basis) on the floorplan line of credit. DESCRIPTION OF ARC CAPITAL STOCK AND PARTNERSHIP UNITS The following is a summary of the
material terms of the capital stock of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
and the partnership units of the Partnership. Copies of ARCs charter and its
Amended and Restated Bylaws are filed as exhibits to ARCs annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005. A copy
of the Partnerships Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part. See Where You Can Find More
Information. ARCs charter provides that it may issue up to 100,000,000
shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 41,027,689 shares have
been issued and are outstanding as of October 21, 2005; 10,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of which 5,750,000 shares have
been classified as 8.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock,
or Series A preferred stock, of which 5,000,000 shares are issued and
outstanding as of October 21, 2005; and 5,252,876 shares of special voting
stock, par value $.01 per share, of which 3,527,896 shares have been issued and
are outstanding as of October 21, 2005. Under Maryland law, ARCs
stockholders generally are not liable for ARCs debts or obligations. All shares of ARC common stock outstanding are duly
authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of ARC common stock are
entitled to receive dividends when authorized by ARCs board of directors out
of assets legally available for the payment of dividends and declared by ARC. They
are also entitled to share ratably in ARCs assets legally available for
distribution to ARCs stockholders in the event of ARCs liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, after payment of or adequate provision for all of
ARCs known debts and liabilities. These rights are subject to the preferential
rights of any other class or series of ARCs stock and to the provisions of ARCs
charter regarding restrictions on transfer of ARCs stock. Subject to
ARCs charter restrictions on transfer of ARCs stock, each outstanding share
of ARC common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to
a vote of ARC stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as
provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, including the
special voting stock described below, the holders of ARC common stock will
possess the exclusive voting power of ARC. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of directors. Holders of
ARC common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund,
redemption or appraisal rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for
any of ARCs securities. Subject to ARCs charter restrictions on transfer of
stock, all shares of common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and
other rights. 146 Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its
assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside
the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of holders
of shares entitled to cast at least two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast
on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for
approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority
of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Except for the amendment
of the provisions of ARCs charter relating to the removal of directors and
amendment of the charter, ARCs charter provides for approval of these matters
by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast. Maryland law permits a
corporation to transfer all or substantially all of its assets without the
approval of the stockholders of the corporation to one or more persons if 90%
or more of the equity interests of the person or persons are owned, directly or
indirectly, by the corporation. In addition, because operating assets may be
held by a corporations subsidiaries, as in ARCs situation, these subsidiaries
may be able to transfer all or substantially all of such assets without a vote
of ARCs stockholders. During 2004
ARC granted to some of its executive officers 95,000 shares of restricted
common stock that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these
restricted shares were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional 37,500
shares of restricted common stock were forfeited pursuant to the terms of their
issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 3,000 of these shares
vested. In April 2005, the ARC
board of directors font size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">2,620 84 3,116 3,200 734 May-99 Bluebonnet
Estates Temple, TX 204 1,185 1,811 204 2,996 3,200 474 All
shares, vested and unvested, are entitled to receive dividends and to vote
unless forfeited. ARC considers the number of vested shares issued under its
2003 equity incentive plan as common stock outstanding and includes them in the
denominator of its calculation of basic earnings per share. ARC also considers
the total number of restricted shares granted under our 2003 equity incentive
plan in the denominator of our calculation of diluted earnings per share if
they are dilutive. ARC returns shares forfeited to the 2003 equity incentive
plan as shares eligible for future grant and adjusts any compensation expense
previously recorded on such shares in the period the forfeiture occurs. We and ARC
have entered into a pairing agreement pursuant to which each of our 1,830,961 partnership
units issued in connection with ARCs 2002 reorganization was issued as part of
a paired unit that includes 1.9268 shares of ARC special voting stock. Each of
the paired units is currently exchangeable by its holder for cash, or, at ARCs
election, one share of ARC common stock, and each paired unit entitles its
holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of ARCs stockholders who
have voting rights generally. Collectively, our limited partners who hold these
paired units and ARC common stock have approximately 5.2% of the total voting
power of ARC common stock at June 30, 2005. A holder of special voting
stock is not entitled to any regular or special dividend payments or other
distributions, including any dividends or other distributions declared or paid
with respect to shares of ARC common stock or any of ARCs other stock, and is
not entitled to receive any distributions in the event of liquidation or
dissolution. The holders of special voting stock have no class voting rights
except as specifically set forth in our charter. ARC may not issue any additional shares of special voting
stock in the future unless such shares are paired with common partnership units.
ARC does not intend to issue any additional shares of its special voting stock.
Upon any redemption of a partnership unit that is paired with a share of
special voting stock 147 in accordance with the redemption
provisions of our partnership agreement, the share of special voting stock will
be cancelled and will become reclassified as an authorized but unissued share
of special voting stock. General Under ARCs charter, ARCs board of directors is authorized
without further stockholder action to provide for the issuance of up to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, with such terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or
conditions of redemption in each case, if any, as permitted by Maryland law and
as shall be set forth in resolutions providing for the issue of preferred stock
adopted by ARCs board of directors. 8.25% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock The Articles Supplementary adopted by ARCs board of
directors creating ARCs Series A preferred stock sets forth the number
and fixes the terms, designations, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and
restrictions of a series of ARC preferred stock classified as 8.25% Series A
cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock. ARC
designated up to 5,750,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred
stock, 5,000,000 shares of which were issued in connection with the IPO. ARCs Series A
preferred stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol ARC Pr A.
ARCs Series A preferred stock has the following terms: · a liquidation preference of
$25.00 per share; · ranks senior to ARC common
stock with respect to dividends and liquidation; · subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior stock, is entitled to
receive, when and as authorized by ARCs board of directors and declared by
ARC, out of funds legally available for payment thereof, cumulative cash
dividends at the rate of 8.25% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference
(equivalent to a fixed annual rate of $2.0625 per share); · source of funds for
dividends on ARCs Series A preferred stock is distributions paid on the
Partnerships Series A preferred units; · not redeemable prior to February 18,
2009, except in certain limited circumstances relating to maintaining ARCs
ability to qualify as a REIT as described below in ARCs Restrictions on
Ownership and Transfer; · redeemable in whole or from
time to time in part, on and after February 18, 2009, by ARC, at its
option, to the extent permitted by law, at a cash redemption price equal to
$25.00 per share, plus all accumulated dividends; · does not have any voting
rights, except in limited circumstances, including where ARC has not been
current on payment of dividends for six or more quarterly periods, whether or
not consecutive; and · is not convertible into or exchangeable for any of ARCs
other property or securities. On August 9, 2000, ARC issued 1,250,000 warrants, each
giving its holder the right to purchase one share of ARC common stock at an
exercise price of $11.70 per share. On January 23, 2004, in preparation
for the IPO, ARC effected a 0.519-for-1 reverse split of ARC common
stock. On May 23, 2005, ARC declared a cash dividend in the amount of
$0.1875 per share of ARC common stock that was paid on 148 July 15, 2005 to holders of
record of ARC common stock at the close of business on June 30, 2005. As a
result of these events, pursuant to the terms of the warrants, effective
immediately following payment of the dividend, the exercise price per share of
ARC common stock under the outstanding warrants to purchase ARC common stock
was adjusted to $18.103 and the total number of shares of ARC common stock
issuable upon exercise of all of such warrants was adjusted to 807,877. The
warrants expire if not exercised prior to 5:00 PM, New York City time, on July 23,
2010. ARCs Restrictions on Ownership and
Transfer For ARC to
qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value
of ARCs outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by
five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include
certain entities) at any time during the last half of a taxable year, and ARCs
shares of stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at
least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a
proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because its board of directors
believes that it is essential for ARC to continue to qualify as a REIT and to
provide additional protection for its stockholders in the event of certain
transactions, ARCs board has adopted, and the stockholders have approved,
provisions of ARCs charter restricting the acquisition of shares of ARCs
stock in order to assist ARC in maintaining its REIT qualifications under
circumstances that could cause ARC to violate the foregoing requirements. Subject to
certain exceptions specified in ARCs charter, no individual may own, or be
deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 7.3% (in value or number of
shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of ARC common
stock or more than 7.3% in value of the outstanding shares of ARCs capital
stock, other than with respect to Gerald J. Ford and certain affiliated parties
for whom the aggregate limit was set by the board of directors of ARC on May 23,
2005 at 19.9%. ARCs charter further prohibits (i) any individual from
owning shares of its stock that would result in ARC being closely held under Section 856(h) of
the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause ARC to fail to qualify as a REIT, (ii) any
individual from transferring shares of its stock if the transfer would result
in its stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons and (iii) any
individual from owning shares of its stock that would result in non U.S.
persons owning 50% or more of the fair market value of its stock. Any person
who acquires or intends to acquire shares of ARCs stock that may violate any
of these restrictions, or who is the intended transferee of shares of its stock
which are transferred to a trust, as discussed below, is required to give ARC
immediate notice and provide ARC with such information as ARC may request in
order to determine the effect of the transfer on ARCs status as a REIT. ARCs board
of directors may waive the 7.3% ownership limit if evidence satisfactory to it
is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future result in ARC
being closely held within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more of the
fair market value of its stock or otherwise result in its failing to qualify as
a REIT. In order to be considered by the board for exemption, an individual
also must not own and must represent that it will not own, directly or
indirectly, an interest in a tenant of ARCs (or a tenant of any entity which
ARC owns or controls) that would cause ARC to own, directly or indirectly, more
than a 9.8% interest in the tenant. The individual also must agree that any violation
or attempted violation of these restrictions will result in the automatic
transfer of the shares of stock causing the violation to the trust. As a
condition of such waiver,eak-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> Jul-01 Breazeale Laramie, WY 3,250 If any
issuance or transfer of ARCs stock would cause the outstanding shares of its
stock to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, such issuance or
transfer will be null and void, and the 149 intended transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Any
attempted transfer of ARCs stock which, if effective, would result in any
individual owning shares of its stock in excess of the 7.3% ownership limit, or
would result in ARC being closely held within the meaning of Section 856(h) of
the Internal Revenue Code, would result in non-U.S. persons owning 50% or more
of the fair market value of ARCs stock or would otherwise result in ARC
failing to qualify as a REIT, will cause the number of shares causing the
violation (rounded to the nearest whole share) to be automatically transferred
to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more qualifying charitable
organizations to be designated by ARC and the intended transferee will acquire
no rights to the stock. Shares transferred to such trust will remain
outstanding, and the trustee of the trust will have all voting and dividend
rights pertaining to such shares. Any dividend or other distribution paid prior
to ARCs discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust will
be paid by the recipient to the trustee upon demand. Any dividend or
distribution paid to the trustee will be held in trust for the charitable
beneficiary. Subject to Maryland law, the trustee will have the authority (1) to
rescind as void any vote cast by the intended transferee prior to ARCs
discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and (2) .0pt;"> 488 2,813 71 All
certificates representing shares of ARC common stock and ARCs Series A
preferred stock bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above. For
purposes of the foregoing discussion, shares of special voting stock that are
at any time held in trust as a result of the excess share provisions of ARCs
charter shall include any of our partnership units paired therewith. All persons
who own more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Internal
Revenue Code or the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder) in the
aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of ARCs stock,
excluding special voting stock, must give written notice containing the
information specified in ARCs charter within 30 days after the end of
each taxable year, which is December 31. In addition, each stockholder
shall upon demand be required to disclose to ARC in writing such information
with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as
ARCs board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the requirements
of any taxing authority or governmental agency. The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding
acquisition of control of ARC by a third party unless ARCs board of directors
determines that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in its best interests. 150 The transfer agent and registrar for ARC common stock and
ARC Series A preferred stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. Series C
Partnership Preferred Partnership Units The Partnership currently has outstanding 705,688 units of Series C
preferred partnership units, or Series C PPUs. The Partnerships Series B
and Series D preferred partnership units were redeemed in July 2005
and July 2004, respectively. The Partnerships Series C PPUs have the
following terms: · rank senior to the common
partnership units as to the payment of distributions and as to the distribution
of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up; · subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are
entitled to receive quarterly cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per
annum; · ">
488 2,884 3,371 79 Feb-04 Brittany
Place Topeka, KS 859 243 1,449 209 243 1,658 1,901 198 Jul-97 Broadmore Goshen, IN 5,750 1,297 7,777 subject to the preferential
rights of holders of any class or series of senior partnership units, are
entitled to a liquidation preference per Series C PPU of $25.00 per unit,
plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions; · may not be redeemed at the
Partnerships option prior to July 30, 2009; on or after such date, the
Partnership has the right to redeem the Series C PPUs, in whole or in
part, at any time or from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the
liquidation preference, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions
to and including the date of redemption; · at any time after January 1,
2007, any holder of Series C PPUs has the right to require the Partnership
to redeem all or a portion of the Series C PPUs held by such holder in
exchange for one-eighth of the redemption price in cash and the balance in a
negotiable note, bearing interest at a rate of 7% per annum; · exchangeable for ARC common
stock in some circumstances; and · no voting rights or right to consent to any matter. Common
Partnership Units The 5.2%
ownership interest in the Partnership that is not held by ARC as of June 30,
2005 represents outstand style="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 856 1,297 8,633 9,929 252 Feb-04 Brookshire
Village Holders of
the Partnerships OP units are entitled to receive quarterly distributions of
available cash (i) first, with respect to any OP units that are entitled
to any preference in distribution, in accordance with the rights of such class
of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in accordance with their
respective percentage interests), and (ii) second, with respect to any OP
units that are not entitled to any preference in distribution, in accordance
with the rights of such class of OP unit (and, within such class, pro rata in
accordance with their respective percentage interests). 151 CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS The following discussion is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any person, for the purpose of avoiding U.S.
federal tax penalties, and was written to support the promotion or marketing of
the offering described herein. Each investor should seek advice based on such
persons particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income
tax consont size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> House Springs, MO 2,135 657 4,015 457 657 4,472 5,129 276 Feb-03 Brookside West Jordan, UT 3,145 795 4,505 780 795 5,285 6,080 · U.S. expatriates; · persons who mark-to-market
the notes or common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes; · subchapter S corporations; · U.S. Holders (as defined
below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; · financial institutions; · insurance companies; · broker-dealers; · regulated investment
companies; · trusts and estates; · holders who receive the
notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, through
the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation; · persons holding the notes,
or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of notes, as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; · persons subject to the
alternative minimum tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; · persons holding their
interest through a partnership or similar pass-through entity; · width="7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">
606 Oct-01 Brookside
Village Berwick, PA 1,848 423 2,601 173 152 and, except to the extent discussed
below: · tax-exempt organizations;
and · non-U.S. Holders (as defined
below). In
addition, this summary does not discuss any non-federal, state, or local tax
considerations. This summary deals only with investors who purchase the notes
as part of the initial offering for the issue price (as discussed below), and
assumes that investors will hold their notes and ARC common stock received
pursuant to an exchange of notes as capital assets (generally, property held
for investment) under the Internal Revenue Code. Investors considering the purchase of notes should consult
their tax advisors with respect to the application of the U.S. federal income
tax laws to their particular situations as well as any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction or under any
applicable tax treaty. As used
herein, the term U.S. Holder means any beneficial owner of a note, or ARC
common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, other than an entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United
States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of
the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an
estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation
regardless of its source, (iv) a trust if (A) a court within the
United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration
of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (v) certain eligible
trusts that elect to be taxed as U.S. Persons under applicable Treasury
Regulations. As used herein, the term Non-U.S. Holder means a beneficial
owner of a note, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a
note, that is not a U.S. Holder. If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial
owner of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note,
the treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the
status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A holder of
notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of a note, that is
a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax
advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, holding
and disposing of notes, or ARC common stock received pursuant to an exchange of
a note. Interest. If the issue price of a note
is less than its stated redemption price at maturity, then the note will be
treated as being issued with original issue discount, or OID, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes unless the difference between the notes issue price and
its stated redemption price at maturity is less than a statutory de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the
stated redemption price at maturity of the note times the number of complete
years from issuance to maturity). Generally, the issue price of a note is the
first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold to purchasers
other than bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in
the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. The stated
redemption price at maturity of a note is the total of all payments to be made
under the note other than qualified stated interest (generally, stated interest
that is unconditionally payable in cash or property at least annually at a
single fixed rate or at certain floating rates that properly take into account
the length of the interval between stated interest payments) and, in this case,
is expected to equal the principal amount of the note. It is
anticipated that the difference, if any, between the issue price and the stated
redemption price at maturity of the notes will be less than the statutory de minimis amount and that the notes,
therefore, will not be treated as having been issued with OID. Thus, rather
than being characterized as interest, such 153 difference should be characterized as if it were gain from
the sale of the notes and must be included in income as principal payments are
received on the notes (based on the proportion of the principal payments
received to the original principal amount of the notes). The
remaining discussion assumes that the notes have not been issued with OID equal
to or in excess of the statutory de minimis
amount. Payments of Stated Interest. Stated interest on a note
without OID generally will be included in the income of a U.S. Holder as
ordinary income at the time such interest is received or accrued, in accordance
with the U.S. Holders regular method of tax accounting. Market Discount. If a U.S. Holder purchases a
note after original issue for an amount that is less than its stated redemption
price at maturity, such U.S. Holder will be treated as having purchased such
note at a market discount, unless such market discount is less than a de minimis amount (1¤4 of 1 percent of the
stated redemption price of the note at maturity times the number of complete
years to maturity after the U.S. Holder acquires the note). Under the market
discount rules, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any partial principal
payment on a note, or any gain realized on the sale, exchange, retirement or
other disposition of a note, as ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (i) the
amount of such payment or realized gain or (ii) the market discount which
has not previously been included in income and is treated as having accrued on
such note at the time of such payment or disposition. Market discount will be
considered to accrue ratably during the period from the date of acquisition to
the maturity date of the note, unless the U.S. Holder elects to accrue market
discount on a constant yield basis. Once made, such an election may be revoked
only with the consent of the IRS and, therefore, should only be made in
consultation with a tax advisor. A U.S.
Holder may be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of the
interest paid or accrued on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase
or carry a note with market discount until the maturity of the note or certain
earlier dispositions, because a current deduction is only allowed to the extent
that the interest expense exceeds the portion of market discount allocable to
the days during the taxable year in which the note was held by the taxpayer. A
U.S. Holder may elect to include market discount in income currently as it
accrues (on either a ratable or constant yield basis), in which case the rules described
above regarding the treatment as ordinary income of gain upon the disposition
of the note and upon the receipt of certain cash payments and regarding the
deferral of interest deductions will not apply. Generally, such currently
included market discount is treated as ordinary interest for federal income tax
purposes. Such an election will apply to all debt instruments with market
discount acquired by the U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the taxable
year to which such election applies and may be revoked only with the consent of
the IRS. The election, therefore, should only be made in consultation with a
tax advisor. Amortizable Bond Premium. If a U.S. Holder purchases a
debt instrument for an amount that is greater than the sum of all amounts
payable on the debt instrument after the purchase date, other than payments of
qualified stated interest, such U.S. Holder will be considered to have purchased
the debt instrument with amortizable bond premium, generally equal in amount
to such excess. However, in the case of a debt instrument that may be redeemed
prior to maturity at the option of the issuer (such as the notes), the amount
of amortizable bond premium is determined by substituting the first date on
which the debt instrument may be redeemed (the redemption date) for the
maturity date and the applicable redemption price on the redemption date for
the amount payable at maturity, if the result would maximize the U.S. Holders
yield to maturity (i.e., result
in a smaller amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to the
period before the redemption date). If the issuer does not in fact exercise its
right to redeem the debt instrument on the applicable redemption date, the debt
instrument will be treated (solely for purposes of the amortizable bond premium
rules) as having matured and then as having been reissued for the U.S. Holders
adjusted acquisition price, which is>
423 2,774 3,197 44 154 the debt instrument (as determined under the applicable
Treasury Regulations), less the sum of (i) any amortizable bond premium
allocable to prior accrual periods and (ii) any payments previously made
on the debt instrument (other than payments of qualified stated interest). The
debt instrument deemed to have been reissued will again be subject to the
amortizable bond premium rules with respect to the remaining dates on
which the debt instrument is redeemable. A U.S. Holder
may elect to amortize bond premium on a debt instrument. Once made, the
election applies to all taxable deb0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> Jun-04 Brookside
Village Dallas, TX 6,536 1,674 8,592 1,639 1,674 10,231 11,905 290 Feb-04 Burntwood Oklahoma City, OK 5,196 1,509 5,185 839 1,509 Election to Include All Interest in
Income Using a Constant Yield Method. All U.S. Holders may
generally, upon election, include in income all interest (including stated
interest, acquisition discount, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market
discount, de minimis market
discount, and unstated interest, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or
acquisition premium) that accrues on a debt instrument by using the constant
yield method applicable to original issue discount, subject to certain
limitations and exceptions. Because this election will affect how the U.S.
Holder treats debt instruments other than the notes, it should be made only in
consultation with a tax advisor. Disposition of the Notes. Upon the sale, exchange
(including an exchange for cash and any ARC common stock), redemption,
repurchase, retirement or other disposition of a note, a U.S. Holder generally
will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the
amount of cash proceeds and the fair market value of any property (including
ARC common stock) received on the disposition (except to the extent such amount
is attributable to accrued but unpaid stated interest, which is taxable as
ordinary income if not previously included in such holders income) and (ii) such
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holders adjusted tax
basis in a note generally will equal the cost of the note to such Holder (i) increased
by any accrued market discount if the U.S. Holder has included the accrued
market discount in income and (ii) decreased by (A) the amount of any
payments, other than qualified stated interest payments, received, and (B) amortizable
bond premium taken, with respect to such note. Capital gain or loss recognized
upon the disposition of a note will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the
note was held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital
gains to non-corporate U.S. Holders is generally 15% (for taxable years through
December 31, 2008). The deductibility of capital losses may be subject to
limitations. Upon the
exchange of a note for cash and ARC common stock, if any, a U.S. Holder will
have a tax basis in any ARC common stock received equal to the fair market
value of such ARC common stock at the time of the exchange. The U.S. Holders
holding period for any ARC common stock received upon an exchange of notes will
begin on the date immediately following the date of such exchange. Adjustments to Exchange Rate. The exchange rate is subject
to adjustment under specified circumstances. Although it is not clear how or to
what extent Section 305 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable
Treasury regulations would apply to the notes because the notes are issued by
The Partnership, rather than ARC, it is possible that the IRS would seek to
apply Section 305 to the notes. If 155 Section 305 were applicable, a holder of notes would,
in certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution of ARC
common stock if and to the extent that the exchange rate is adjusted, resulting
in ordinary income to the extent of ARCs current and accumulated earnings and
profits. Adjustments to the exchange rate made pursuant to a bona fide
reasonable adjustment formula which has the effect of preventing the dilution
of the interest of the holders of the debt instruments will generally not be
deemed to result in a constructive distribution of ARC common stock. Certain of
the possible adjustments provided in the notes (including, without limitation,
adjustments in respect of taxable dividends to ARCs stockholders) do not
qualify as being made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula. If
such adjustments are made, we intend to take the position that you will be
deemed to have received constructive distributions from ARC, even though you
have not received any cash or property as a result of such adjustments. The tax
consequences of the receipt of a distribution from ARC are described below
under Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders and Taxation of Tax-Exempt
U.S. Stockholders. Even if an adjustment to the exchange rate were not to
result in a taxable constructive distribution to a holder of notes under Section 305
because the notes are issued by The Partnership rather than ARC, it is possible
that the IRS could assert that, under principles similar to those of Section 305,
a holder should recognize taxable income, which might be considered interest
and that you should include such interest in income upon the adjustment to the
exchange rate or, alternatively, accrue such interest prior to such adjustment. The rules governing
the U.S. federal income taxation of a Non-U.S. Holder are complex and no
attempt will be made herein to provide more than a summary of such rules. Non size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 6,024 7,533 707 Oct-97 Bush Ranch Interest. A Non-U.S. Holder holding
the notes on its own behalf generally will be exempt from U.S. federal income
and withholding taxes on payments of interest on a note so long as such
payments are not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business
in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, unless, in the case of interest
payments, such Non-U.S. Holder is a direct or indirect 10% or greater partner
(as defined in section 871(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code) in The
Partnership, a controlled foreign corporation related to The Partnership or a
bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary
course of its trade or business. In order
for a Non-U.S. Holder that is an individual or corporation (or entity treated
as such for U.S. federal income tax purposes) to qualify for the exemption from
taxation, the withholding agent (generally, the last U.S. payor or a non-U.S.
payor who is a qualified intermediary or withholding foreign partnership) must
have received a statement (generally made on IRS Form W-8BEN) from
the individual or corporation that: (i) is signed under penalties of
perjury by the beneficial owner of the note, (ii) certifies that such
owner is not a U.S. Holder and (iii) provides the beneficial owners name
and address. Certain securities clearing organizations and other entities that
are not beneficial owners, may provide a signed statement accompanied by a copy
of the beneficial owners IRS Form W-8BEN to the withholding agent. An
IRS Form W-8BEN is generally effective for the remainder of the year
of signature plus three full calendar years unless a change in circumstances
renders any information on the form incorrect. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, a W-8BEN with a U.S. taxpayer identification number will remain
effective until a change in circumstances makes any information on the form
incorrect, provided that the withholding agent reports at least annually to the
beneficial owner. The beneficial owner must inform the withholding agent within
30 days of such change and furnish a new IRS Form W-8BEN. A Non-U.S.
Holder that is not an individual or corporation (or an entity treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding the notes on its own
behalf may have substantially increased reporting requirements and should
consult its tax advisor. 156 To the
extent that interest income with respect to a note is not exempt from the
United States tax as described above, a Non-U.S. Holder may still be able to
eliminate or reduce such taxes under an applicable income tax treaty. House Springs, MO 751 101 601 75 101 676 777 132 Disposition of the Notes. Any gain realized on the
sale, redemption, exchange, repurchase, (including an exchange for cash and any
ARC common stock), retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a
Non-U.S. Holder (except to the extent such amount is attributable to accrued
but unpaid stated interest, which would be taxable as described under the
preceding two paragraphs) will be exempt from U.S. federal income and
withholding taxes so long as: (i) the gain is not effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S.
Holder, (ii) in the case of a foreign individual, the Non-U.S. Holder is
not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year,
and (iii) the notes do not constitute U.S. real property interests
within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or
FIRPTA. Although
the applicable rules are not entirely clear, we intend to take the
position that the notes constitute U.S. real property interests and,
accordingly, that U.S. federal withholding tax applies under FIRPTA to any
redemption, repurchase or exchange of the notes (including an exchange of a
note for cash and any ARC common stock). Therefore, we intend to withhold 10%
of any amounts payable on the redemption, or repurchase or exchange by us of a
note (including an exchange of a note for cash and any ARC common stock). Further,
any other sale or disposition of a note may be subject to U.S. federal income
tax withholding. You are
urged to consult your tax advisor as to whether the sale, redemption,
repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S.
federal income tax under FIRPTA if (i) the ARC common stock are part of a
class of stock that is regularly traded on and established securities market
and you held notes that, on the date of their acquisition, had a fair market
value of 5 percent or less of the fair market value of the ARC common
stock, or (ii) ARC is a domestically-controlled REIT. ARC will be a
domestically-controlled REIT if at all times during a specified testing
period it is a REIT and less than 50% in value of the ARCs shares is held
directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. ARC believes that it currently is a
domestically-controlled REIT, but because its common stock is publicly
traded, there can be no assurance that it in fact is qualified or will continue
to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT. If a sale, redemption,
repurchase or exchange of a note for ARC common stock is exempt from U.S. federal
income tax under FIRPTA, any amounts withheld from such payments to you may be
refunded or credited against your federal income tax liability, if any, if you
file with the IRS, on a timely basis, the required IRS forms. Adjustments to Exchange Rate. The exchange rate is subject
to adjustment in certain circumstances. Any such adjustment could, in certain
circumstances, give rise to a deemed distribution or additional interest
payment to Non-U.S. Holders of the notes. See United States HoldersAdjustTimes New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Jan-00 Camelot Salt Lake City, UT In the case
of a deemed distribution or additional interest payment, because such deemed
distributions will not give rise to any cash from which any applicable U.S.
federal withholding tax can be satisfied, the indenture provides that we may
set off any withholding tax that we are required to collect with respect to any
such deemed distribution or payment against cash payments of interest or from
cash or shares of ARC common stock otherwise deliverable to a holder upon an
exchange of notes or a redemption or repurchase of a note. Except to the extent that an applicable income tax treaty
otherwise provides, a Non-U.S. Holder whose gain or interest income with
respect to a note is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business in the United States by such Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from the
withholding tax 157 12,127 1,927 10,957 1,006 1,927 11,963 13,890 previously discussed if an
appropriate statement is furnished, will generally be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on the gain or interest income at regular U.S. federal income tax
rates, as if the holder were a U.S. person, provided that the holder files an
IRS Form W-8ECI. In addition, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign
corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30 percent
of its dividend equivalent amount within the meaning of the Internal Revenue
Code for the taxable year, subject to adjustment, unless it qualifies for a
lower rate under an applicable tax treaty. Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding In general,
information reporting requirements and back-up withholding at the applicable
rate will apply to payments on a note (including stated interest payments and
payments of the proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, repurchase,
retirement or other disposition of a note), unless the holder of the note (i) is
a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates that fact or (ii) provides a correct taxpayer identification
number, certifies as to its exemption from backup withholding and otherwise
complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Certain
penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a holder that is required to supply
information but does not do so in the proper manner. Information
reporting requirements and backup withholding generally will not apply to
payments on a note to a Non-U.S. Holder if the statement described in Non-U.S.
Holders of the Notes is duly provided by such Holder, provided that the
Withholding Agent does not have actual knowledge that the Holder is a United
States person. Information reporting requirements and backup withholding will
not apply to any payment of the proceeds of the sale of a note effected outside
the United States by a foreign office of a broker (as defined in applicable
Treasury Regulations), unless such broker (i) is a United States person, (ii) derives
50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade
or business in the United States, (iii) is a controlled foreign
corporation as to the United States or (iv) is a U.S. branch of a foreign
bank or a foreign insurance company. Payment of the proceeds of any such sale
effected outside the United States by a foreign office of any broker that is
described in (i), (ii) or (iii) of the preceding sentence will not be
subject to backup withholding, but will be subject to the information reporting
requirements unless such broker has documentary evidence in its records that
the beneficial owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and certain other conditions are met,
or the beneficial owner otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the
proceeds of any such sale to or through the United States office of a broker is
subject to information reporting and backup withholding requirements, unless
the beneficial owner of the note provides the statement described in Non-U.S.
Holders of the Notes or otherwise establishes an exemption. Any amount withheld from a payment to a holder of a note
under the backup withholding rules is allowable as a credit against such
holders U.S. federal income tax liability (which might entitle such holder to
a refund), provided that such holder furnishes the required information to the
IRS. ARC has
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with
its taxable year ended December 31, 1998. ARC believes that it has been
organized and has operated in a manner which allows it to qualify for taxation
as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year
ended December 31, 1998, and it intends to continue to be organized and
operate in such a manner. ARC has
received the opinion of Skadden to the effect that commegn="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
2,073 Aug-00 Carnes
Crossing Summerville, SC 10,000 1,979 REIT. It must be emphasized that the opinion of Skadden is
based on various assumptions relating to the organization and operation of ARC,
and is conditioned upon representations and covenants made by the management of
ARC and affiliated entities regarding its organization, assets, and the past,
present and future conduct of its business operations. While ARC believes that
it is qualified and operated as a REIT, and intends to continue to operate so
that it will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing
REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of
future changes in the circumstances of ARC, no assurance can be given by
Skadden or ARC that ARC will so qualify for any particular year. Skadden will
have no obligation to advise ARC or the holders of ARC common stock of any
subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed, or of any
subsequent change in the applicable law. You should be aware that opinions of
counsel are not binding on the IRS, and no assurance can be given that the IRS
will not challenge the conclusions set forth in such opinions. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on the ability
of ARC to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual operating results,
distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification
requirements imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code, the compliance
with which will not be reviewed by Skadden. ARCs ability to qualify as a REIT
also requires that it satisfy certain asset tests, some of which depend upon
the fair market values of assets directly or indirectly owned by ARC. Such
values may not be susceptible to a p6.0pt;">
11,550 As
indicated above, qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon ARCs
ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various qualification requirements
imposed upon REITs by the Internal Revenue Code. The material qualification
requirements are summarized below, under Requirements for QualificationGeneral.
While ARC intends to continue to operate so that it qualifies as a REIT, no
assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge ARCs qualification as a
REIT or that it will be able to operate in accordance with the REIT
requirements in the future. See Failure to Qualify. Provided
that ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be entitled to a deduction for
dividends that it pays and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal
corporate income tax on its net income that is currently distributed to our
stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the double taxation at
the corporate and stockholder levels that results generally from investment in
a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT generally is taxed only at
the stockholder level, upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT. For tax
years through 2008, stockholders who are individual U.S. stockholders (as
defined below) are generally taxed on corporate dividends at a maximum rate of
15% (the same as long-term capital gains), thereby substantially reducing,
though not completely eliminating, the double taxation that has historically
applied to corporate dividends. With limited exceptions, however, dividends
received by individual U.S. stockholders (as defined below) from ARC or from
other entities that are taxed as REITs will continue to be taxed at rates
applicable to ordinary income, which will be as high as 35% through 2010.
604 1,979 12,154 14,133 338 Feb-04 Carriage
Court Central Net
operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT
generally do not pass through to the stockholders of the REIT, subject to
special rules for certain items, such as capital gains, recognized by
REITs. 159 If ARC qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject
to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances: · It will be taxed at regular
corporate rates on any undistributed net taxable income, including
undistributed net capital gains; Orlando, FL 2,082 420 2,142 62 420 2,204 · If it has net income from
prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of
property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a
100% tax. See Prohibited Transactions, and Foreclosure Property, below; · If it elects to treat
property that it acquires in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan
or from certain leasehold terminations as foreclosure property, we may
thereby avoid (a) the 100% tax on gain from a resale of that property (if
the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction) and (b) the
inclusion of any income from such property not qualifying for purposes of the
REIT gross income tests discussed below, but the income from the sale or
operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest
applicable rate (currently 35%); · If it fails to satisfy the
75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but
nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT because other requirements
are met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the
greater of (1) the amount by which it fails the 75% gross income test or (2) the
amount by which it fails the 95% gross income test (for its taxable year ended December 31,
2004, the amount by which 90% of its gross income exceeds the amount qualifying
under the 95% gross income test), as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a
fraction intended to reflect our profitability; · Commencing with its taxable
year beginning on January 1, 2005, if it fails to satisfy any of the REIT
asset tests, as described below, by larger than a de minimis amount, but its failure is due to reasonable
cause and it nonetheless maintains its REIT qualification because of specified
cure provisions, it will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of
$50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate (currently 35%) of the net income
generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it failed to
satisfy the asset tests; · Commencing " style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.55pt;">
2,624 220 May-98 Carriage
Court East Orlando, FL · It may be required to pay
monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if it fails
to meet record-keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance
with rules relating to the composition of its stockholders, as described
below in Requirements for QualificationGeneral; 160 · A 100% excise tax may be
imposed on some items of income and expense that are directly or constructively
paid between ARC and its taxable REIT subsidiaries&tom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:35.25pt;">
2,139 444 2,318 · If it acquires appreciated
assets from a corporation that is not a REIT in a transaction in which the
adjusted tax basis of the assets in its hands is determined by reference to the
adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the non-REIT corporation, it
will be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax
rate then applicable if it subsequently recognizes gain on a disposition of any
such assets during the 10-year period following their acquisition from
the non-REIT corporation. The results described in this paragraph assume that
the non-REIT corporation will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be
subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by ARC; · It may elect to retain and
pay income tax on its net long-term capital gain. In that case, a stockholder
would include its proportionate share of ARCs undistributed long-term capital
gain (to the extent it makes a timely designation of such gain to the
stockholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax that ARC paid
on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the
tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the stockholders
basis in ARC common stock; and · It may have subsidiaries or
own interests in other lower-tier entities that are subchapter C corporations,
the earnings of which could be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax. In addition, ARC and its subsidiaries may be subject to a
variety of taxes other than U.S. federal income tax, including payroll taxes
and state, local, and foreign income, property;"> 150 444 2,468 2,912 Requirements for QualificationGeneral The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation,
trust or association: (1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors; (2) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by
transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; (3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the
special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs; (4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance
company subject to specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; (5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more
persons; (6) in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not
more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code to include specified entities); (7) which meets other tests described below, including with
respect to the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its
distributions; and (8) style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">
239 161 The
Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must
be met during the entire taxable year, and that condition (5) must be
met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or
during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Conditions (5) and
(6) do not need to be satisfied for the first taxable year for which an
election to become a REIT has been made. ARCs charter provides restrictions
regarding the ownership and transfer of its shares, which are intended to
assist in satisfying the share ownership requirements described in
conditions (5) and (6) above. For purposes of
condition (6), an individual generally includes a supplemental
unemployment compensation benefit plan, a private foundation or a portion of a
trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes, but
does not include a qualified pension plan or profit sharing trust. To monitor
compliance with the share ownership requirements, ARC is generally required to
maintain records regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, ARC
must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant
percentages of its stock, in which the record holders are to disclose the
actual owners of the shares, i.e.,
the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by ARC. A
list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be
maintained as part of its records. Failure by ARC to comply with these record-keeping
requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. If ARC satisfies these
requirements and has no reason to know that condition (6) is not
satisfied, it will be deemed to have satisfied such conditiont-size:7.5pt;letter-spacing:-.05pt;">May-98 Carsons Chambersburg, PA 944 231 1,391 20 In addition, a corporation may not qualify as a REIT unless
its taxable year is the calendar year. ARC has and will continue to have a
calendar taxable year. Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the case of a REIT that
is a partner in a partnership, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT is
deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnerships assets and to earn
its proportionate share of the partnerships gross income based on its pro rata
share of capital interest in the partnership for purposes of the asset and
gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. However, solely for
purposes of the 10% value test, described below, the determination of a REITs
interest in partnership assets will be based on the REITs proportionate
interest in any securities issued by the partnership, excluding for these
purposes, certain excluded securities as described in the Internal Revenue Code.
In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership generally are
deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, the
proportionate share of ARC of the assets and items of income of partnerships in
which it owns an equity interest is treated as its assets and items of income
for purposes of applying the REIT requirements described below. Disregarded Subsidiaries. If a REIT owns a corporate
subsidiary that is a qualified REIT subsidiary, that subsidiary is
disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities
and items of income, deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as
assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT
itself, including for purposes of the gross income and asset tests applicable
to REITs, as summarized below. A qualified REIT subsidiary is any corporation,
other than a TRS (as described below), that is wholly-owned by a REIT, by
other disregarded subsidiaries or by a combination of the two. Single member
limited liability companies that are wholly-owned by a REIT are also
generally disregarded as separate entities for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, including for purposes of the REIT gross income and asset tests. ARCs
corporate subsidiary, ARC IV GV, Inc., is a qualified REIT
subsidiary. Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. A REIT, in general, may
jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned,
to treat the subsidiary corporation as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS
or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed
above, is not ignored for 162 U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such an entity would
generally be subject to corporate income tax on its earnings. A REIT is not
treated as holding the assets of a TRS or other taxable subsidiary corporation
or as receiving any income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued
by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the REIT, and the REIT generally
recognizes as income the dividends, if any, that it receives from the
subsidiary. A TRS may be used by the parent REIT to undertake indirectly
activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing
directly or through pass-through subsidiaries or render commercially unfeasible
(for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as
nonqualifying hedging income or inventory sales). Certain
restrictions are imposed on TRSs intended to ensure that such entities will be
subject to appropriate levels of U.S. federal income taxation. Generally, the
Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of a TRS to deduct certain interest
payments made in any year to an affiliated REIT. In addition, if amounts are
paid to a REIT or deducted by a TRS due to transactions between a REIT, its
tenants and/or a TRS that exceed the amount that would be paid to or deducted
by a party in an arms length transaction, absent certain statutory safe harbor
provisions, the REIT generally will be subject to an excise tax equal to 100%
of such excess. ARC and several of ARCs corporate subsidiaries, ARC
Dealership, Inc., Windstar Aviation Corp., ARC Insurance Services, Inc.,
ARC Management Services, Inc., ARC DAM Management, Inc., ARC TRS, Inc.,
Colonial Gardens Water, Inc., and ARCMS, Inc., have made an election
for those subsidiaries to be treated as a TRS for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. ARC may form additional TRSs in the future. To the extent that any
such TRSs pay any taxes, they will havsize:1.0pt;"> 231 1,411 1,641 24 In order to
maintain qualification as a REIT, ARC annually must satisfy two gross income
tests. First, at least 75% of its gross income for each taxable year, excluding
gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in prohibited
transactions, must be derived from investments relating to real property or
mortgages on real property, including rents from real property, dividends
received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured
by real property (including certain types of mortgage-backed securities),
and gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as income from certain
kinds of temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of its gross income in
each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be
derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% income
test described above, as well as other dividends, interest, and gain from the
sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to
real property. Dividend Income. Dividends received (directly
or indirectly) from a REIT, to the extent of the current and accumulated
earnings and profits of the distributing REIT, will be qualifying income for
purposes of both the 95% and 75% gross income tests. Distributions received (directly
or indirectly) from TRSs or other corporations that are not REITs or qualified
REIT subsidiaries will be classified as dividend income to the extent of the
current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation.
Such distributions will generally constitute qualifying income for purposes of
the 95% gross income test, but not under the 75% gross income test. 163 Rents from Real Property. Rents received will qualify
as rents from real property in satisfying the gross income tests described
above, only if seve6.0pt;">
Jun-04
In addition, in order for rents received to qualify as rents
from real property, the rent must not be based in whole or in part on the
income or profits of any person. However, an amount will not be excluded from
rents from real property solely by being based on a fixed percentage or
percentages of sales. Moreover, for rents received to qualify as rents from
real property, the REIT generally must not operate or manage the property or
furnish or render certain services to the tenants of such property, other than
through an independent contractor who is adequately compensated and from
which the REIT derives no income, or through a TRS. A REIT is permitted,
however, to perform services that are usually or customarily rendered in
connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise
considered rendered to the occupant of the property. In addition, a REIT may
directly or indirectly provide non-customary services to tenants without
disqualifying all of the rent from the property if the payment for such
services does not exceed 1% of the total gross income from the property. In
such a case, only the amounts for non-customary services are not treated as
rents from real property and the provision of the services does not disqualify
the related rent. Moreover, a REIT is permitted to provide services to tenants
or others through a TRS without disqualifying the rental income received from
tenants for purposes of the REIT income tests. Rental income will qualify as rents from real property only
to the extent that the REIT does not directly or constructively own, (1) in
the case of any tenant which is a corporation, stock possessing 10% or more of
the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or
10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of such
tenant, or (2) in the case of any tenant which is not a corporation, an
interest of 10% or more in the assets or net profits of such tenant. However,
rental payments from a TRS will qualify as rents from real property even if the
REIT owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of the TRS if at least 90%
of the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by the TRS is
substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for
comparable space. Interest Income. Interest income constitutes
qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the 75% gross income test to the
extent that the obligation is secured by a mortgage on real property. If
interest income is received with respect to a mortgage loan that is secured by
both real property and other property and the highest principal amount of the
loan outstanding during a taxable year exce"font-size:7.5pt;">Castle
Acres OFallon, IL 2,333 450 2,654 579 450 3,233 3,683 698 Oct-99 Castlewood
Estates Mableton, GA 1,001 5,889 499 1,001 6,388 7,389 170 Feb-04 Casual
Estates Liverpool, NY 8,425 1,742 10,529 To the
extent that interest income is derived from a loan where all or a portion of
the amount of interest payable is contingent, such income generally will
qualify for purposes of the gross income tests only if it is based upon the
gross receipts or sales and not the net income or profits of any person. Failure to Satisfy the Gross Income Tests. ARC intends to monitor its
sources of income, including any non-qualifying income received, so as to
ensure its compliance with the gross income tests. If ARC fails to satisfy one
or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, it may still
qualify as a REIT for the year if the failure to meet these tests was due to
reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and, following the
identification of such failure, it sets forth a description of each item of
gross 164 income that satisfies the gross income tests in a schedule
for the taxable year filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the
Treasury. It is not possible to state whether ARC would be entitled to the
benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief
provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving ARC,
it would not qualify as a REIT. As discussed above under Taxation of ARC,
even where these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed upon the
profit attributable to the amount by which it fails to satisfy the particular
gross income test. At the
close of each calendar quarter, ARC must also satisfy four tests relating to
the nature of its assets. First, at least 75% of the value of its total assets
must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items, U.S. government
securities and, under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased
with new capital. For this purpose, real estate assets include interests in
real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property,
stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs and certain kinds of mortgage
loans. Second, except for securities that qualify for as real estate assets
purposes of the 75% test and securities of TRSs and qualified REIT
subsidiaries, the value of any one issuers securities owned by ARC may not
exceed 5% of the value of its gross assets. Third, except for securities that
qualify for as real estate assets purposes of the 75% test and securities of
TRSs and qualified REIT subsidiaries, ARC may not own more than 10% of any one
issuers outstanding securities, as measured by either voting power or value. Fourth,
the aggregate value of all securities of TRSs held by ARC may not exceed 20% of
the value of its gross assets. The 10%
value test does not apply to certain straight debt and other excluded
securities, as described in the Internal Revenue Code, including but not
limited to any loan to an individual or an estate, any obligation to pay rents
from real property and any security issued by a REIT. In addition, (a) a
REITs interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security for
purposes of applying the 10% value test; (b) any debt instrument issued by
a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be
considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the
partnerships gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the
75% REIT gross income test; and (c) any debt instrument issued by a
partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be
considered a security issued by the partnership to the extent of the REITs
interest as a partner in the partnership. 1,298 1,742 11,827 165 ARC believes that its assets generally will be qualifying
assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. However, other debt instruments
secured by non-real estate assets, or unsecured debt securities may not be
qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. Moreover, values of some
assets, such as the value of the TRSs, may not be susceptible to a precise
determination and are subject to change in the future. Furthermore, the proper
classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. federal income tax
purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the
application of the REIT asset tests. As an example, an investment in equity
securities of a REIT issuer that were determined by the IRS to represent
debt securities of such issuer, such securities would also not qualify as real
estate assets. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not
contend that interests in subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers
(including REIT issuers) cause a violation of the REIT asset tests. Annual
Distribution Requirements In order to qualify as a REIT, ARC is required to
distribute dividen.0pt;">
13,569 298 Feb-04 (a) the sum of: 90% of its REIT taxable income (computed
without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and net capital gains) and
90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property (as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code); minus (b) the sum of specified items of non-cash income that exceeds
a percentage of its income. These
distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate or in the
following taxable year if such distributions are declared in October, November or
Dece style="border:none;"> F-61 Cedar
Creek Huntsville, AL 379 To the
extent that a REIT distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its REIT
taxable income, as adjusted, it will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate
tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, the REIT may elect to retain,
rather than distribute, its net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such
gains. If a REIT
fails to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85%
of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital
gain net income for such year and (c) any undistributed taxable income
from prior periods, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such
required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed
(taking into account excess distributions from prior periods) and (y) the
amounts of income retained on which it paid corporate income tax. ARC intends
to make timely distributions so that it is not subject to the 4% excise tax. It is
possible that ARC, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash to meet the
distribution requirements due to timing differences between (a) the actual
receipt of cash, including receipt of distributions from its subsidiaries and (b) the
inclusion of items in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the
event that such timing differences occur, in order to meet the distribution
requirements, it might be necessary to arrange for short-term, or possibly
long-term, borrowings or to pay dividends in the form of taxable in-kind
distributions of property. A REIT may be able to rectify a failure to meet the
distribution requirements for a year by paying deficiency dividends to
stockholders in a later year, which may be included in its deduction for
dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, the REIT may be able to
avoid losing its qualification as a REIT or 166 being taxed on amounts distributed
as deficiency dividends. However, it will be required to pay interest and a
penalty based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends. 152 1,276
Net income derived from a prohibited transaction is subject
to a 100% tax. The term prohibited transaction generally includes a sale or
other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held
primarily for sale to customers, in the ordinary course of a trade or business
by a REIT, by a lower-tier partnership in which the REIT holds an equity
interest or by a borrower that has issued a shared appreciation mortgage or
similar debt instrument to the REIT. ARC intends to hold its properties for
investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of
owning and operating properties and to make sales of properties that are
consistent with its investment objectives. However, whether property is held primarily
for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on
the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any
particular property in which ARC holds a direct or indirect interest will not
be treated as property held for sale to customers or that certain safe-harbor
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that prevent such treatment will apply.
The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held
through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be
subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate income tax
rates. Foreclosure property is real property and any personal
property incident to such real property (1) that is acquired by a REIT as
a result of the REIT having bid on the property at foreclosure or having
otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or
process of law after there was a default (or default was imminent) on a lease
of the property or a mortgage loan held by the REIT and secured by the
property, (2) for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT
at a time when defa>147 152 1,423 1,575 233 Jan-98 &nbsult was not imminent or anticipated and (3) for which
such REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure
property. REITs generally are subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate
(currently 35%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain
from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that would
otherwise be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any
gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has
been made will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited
transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute
inventory or dealer property in the hands of the selling REIT. ARC does not
anticipate that it will receive any income from foreclosure property that is
not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but, if it
does receive any such income, ARC intends to elect to treat the related
property as foreclosure property. Commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1,
2005, in the event that ARC violates a provision of the Internal Revenue Code
that would result in its failure to qualify as a REIT, specified relief
provisions will be available to avoid such disqualification if (1) the
violation is due to reasonable cause, (2) it pays a penalty of $50,000 for
each failure to satisfy the provision and (3) the violation does not
include a violation under the gross income or asset tests described above (for
which other specified relief provisions are available). This cure provision
reduces the instances that could lead to a disqualification as a REIT for
violations due to reasonable cause. If ARC fails to qualify for taxation as a
REIT in any taxable year and none of the relief provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code apply, it will be subject to tax, including any applicable
alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates.
Distributions to its stockholders in any year in which it is not a REIT will
not be deductible, nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to
relief under the specific statutory provisions, it will also be 167 disqualified from re-electing to be
taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following a year during which
qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether, in all
circumstances, ARC will be entitled to statutory relief. Taxation of Taxable U.S.
Stockholders This
section summarizes the taxation of U.S. stockholders that are not tax-exempt
organizations. For these purposes, a U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of
ARCs stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a U.S. Holder If an
entity or arrangemp; Cedar
Creek, KS Salina, KS 741 223 In
addition, distributions from ARC that are designated as capital gain dividends
will be taxed to U.S. stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the
extent that they do not exceed the actual net capital gain of ARC for the
taxable year, without regard to the period for which the U.S. stockholder has
held its stock. To the extent that ARC elects under the applicable provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code to retain its net capital gains, U.S. stockholders
will be treated as having received, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the
undistributed capital gains as well as a corresponding credit for taxes paid by
ARC on such retained capital gains. U.S. stockholders will increase their
adjusted tax basis in their stock by the difference between their allocable
share of such retained capital gain and their share of the tax paid by ARC. Corporate
U.S. stockholders ma">
2,754 Distributions
in excess of ARCs current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be
taxable to a U.S. stockholder to the extent that they do not exceed the
adjusted tax basis of the U.S. stockholders shares in respect of which the
distributions were made, but rather will reduce the adjusted tax basis of these
shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of
an individual U.S. stockholders shares, they will be included in income
as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been
held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend declared by ARC in
October, November or December of any year and payable to a U.S.
stockholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated as
both paid by ARC and received by the U.S. stockholder on December 31 of
such year, provided that the dividend is actually paid before the end of January of
the following calendar year. 168 With respect to U.S. stockholders who are taxed at the
rates applicable to individuals, ARC may elect to designate a portion of its
distributions paid to such U.S. stockholders as qualified dividend income.
A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified
dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. stockholders as capital
gain, provided that holding period and other requirements are met by both ARC
and the U.S. stockholder. The maximum amount of ARCs distributions eligible to
be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the
sum of: (a) the qualified dividend income received by ARC during such
taxable year from non-REIT C corporations (including dividends attributable to
any TRSs, which are subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that ARC
designates such dividends as qualified dividend income); (b) the excess of any undistributed REIT taxable income
recognized during the immediately preceding year over the U.S. federal income
tax paid by ARC with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and (c) the excess of any income
recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a
built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a
non-REIT C corporation over the U.S. federal income tax paid by ARC with
respect to such built-in gain. In general, a U.S. stockholder will realize gain or loss
upon the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of ARCs stock in an
amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any
property and the amount of cash received in such disposition and the U.S.
stockholders adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time of the disposition.
In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate
U.S. stockholders upon the sale or disposition of shares of ARCs stock will be
subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% for taxable years
through 2008, if the stock is held for more than 12 months, and will be
taxed at ordinary income rates (of up to 35% through 2010) if the stock is held
for 12 months or less. Gains recognized by U.S. stockholders that are
corporations are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 35%,
whether or not classified as long-term capital gains. The IRS has the authority
to prescribe, but has not yet prescribed, regulations that would apply a
capital gain tax rate of 25% (which is generally higher than the long-term
capital gain tax rates for non-corporate holders) to a portion of capital gain
realized by a non-corporate holder on the sale of REIT stock or depositary
shares that would correspond to the REITs unrecaptured Section 1250
gain. Holders are advised to consult with their own tax advisors with respect
to their capital gain tax liability. The ability of a U.S. stockholder to
deduct capital losses may be subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue
Code. Passive Activity Losses and
Investment Interest Limitations Distributions made by ARC and gain arising from the sale or
exchange by a U.S. stockholder of ARCs stock will not be treated as passive
activity income. As a result, U.S. stockholders will not be able to apply any passive
losses against income or gain relating to ARCs stock. Distributions made by
ARC, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will
be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment
interest limitation. A U.S. stockholder that elects to treat capital gain
dividends, capital gains from the disposition of stock or qualified dividend
income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation
will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such amounts. Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting 305 223 3,059 3,282 500 Sep-98 Cedar
Knoll ARC will
report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount of dividends paid during
each calendar year and the amount of any tax withheld. Under the backup
withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with
respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or 169 comes within other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social
security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding
and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct
taxpayer identification number or social security number may also be subject to
penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In
addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain
distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign
status. ARC must
report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. stockholder the amount of
dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such
dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the
information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S.
stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty. A
non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless applicable
certification requirements are met. Payment of
the proceeds of a sale of ARCs stock within the United States is subject to
both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner
certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the
payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial
owner is a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an
exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARCs stock conducted through
certain United State:7.5pt;">Waterloo, IA 3,952 940 5,330 142 Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holders U.S. federal income
tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. Taxation of Tax-Exempt U.S.
Stockholders U.S.
tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing
trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S.
federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their
unrelated business taxable income, which we refer to in this prospectus as UBTI.
While many investments in real estate may generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that
dividend distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity do not constitute
UBTI. Based on that ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt U.S.
stockholder has not held our stock as debt financed property within the
meaning of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e.
where the acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a
borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the stock is not
otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, distributions from ARC and
income from the sale of ARC stock generally should not give rise to UBTI to a
tax-exempt U.S. stockholder. Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders that are social clubs,
voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit
trusts, and qualified group legal services plans exempt from U.S. federal
income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of
the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, are subject to different UBTI rules,
which generally will require them to characterize distributions from us as
UBTI.
940 5,472 6,412 137 170 and (2) ARC would not
have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code provides that stock owned by such trusts shall be
treated, for purposes of the requirement that not more than 50% of the value of
the outstanding stock of a REIT is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or
fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain
entities) by the beneficiaries of such trusts. Certain restrictions on
ownership and transfer of ARCs stock should generally prevent a tax-exempt
entity from owning more than 10% of the value of ARC stock, or ARC from
becoming a pension-held REIT. Tax-exempt U.S. stockholders are urged to consult their own
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax
consequences of owning ARC stock. Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the acquisit size="1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Apr-04 Cedar
Terrace Cedar Rapids, IA Ordinary Dividends. The portion of dividends
received by non-U.S. stockholders payable out of ARCs earnings and profits
that are not attributable to gains from sales or exchanges of U.S. real
property interests and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the non-U.S. stockholder will generally be subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced or eliminated by an
applicable income tax treaty. Under some treaties, however, lower rates
generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs. In general, non-U.S. stockholders will not be considered to
be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of
ARC stock. In cases where the dividend income from a non-U.S. stockholders
investment in ARC stock is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the
non-U.S. stockholders conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S.
stockholder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at
graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. stockholders are taxed with respect
to such dividends, and may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on the
income after the application of the income tax in the case of a non-U.S.
stockholder that is a corporation. Non-Dividend Distributions. Unless (A) ARC stock
constitutes a U.S. real property interest, or USRPI, or (B) either (1) if
the non-U.S. stockholders investment in ARC stock is effectively connected
with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. stockholder (in which
case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S.
stockholders with respect to such gain) or (2) if the non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the
United States (in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to
a 30% tax on the individuals net capital gain for the year), distributions by
ARC which are not dividends out of its earnings and profits will not be subject
to U.S. federal income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at
which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed
current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject
to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the non-U.S.
stockholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is
subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of ARCs
current and accumulated earnings and profits. If ARCs stock constitutes a
USRPI, as described below, distributions by ARC in excess of the sum of its
earnings and profits plus the non-U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in its
ARC stock will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act
of 1980, or FIRPTA, at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains
rates, that would apply to a U.S. stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as
the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable
withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds
the stockholders share of ARCs earnings and profits. 171 Capital Gain Dividends. Under FIRPTA, a distribution
made by ARC to a non-U.S. stockholder, to the extent attributable to gains from
dispositions ofp>
835 Dispositions of Our Stock. Unless ARC stock constitutes
a USRPI, a sale of the stock by a non-U.S. stockholder generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income taxation under FIRPTA. The stock will not be
treated as a USRPI if less than 50% of ARCs assets throughout a prescribed
testing period consist of interests in real property located within the United
States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a
capacity as a creditor. ARC does not expect that more than 50% of its assets
will consist of interests in real property located in the United States. In addition, ARC stock will not constitute a USRPI if ARC
is a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a
REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in
value of its outstanding stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S.
stockholders. ARC believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a
domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of ARC stock should not
be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because ARC stock is widely held,
ARC cannot assure its investors that it is or will remain a domestically
controlled REIT. Even if ARC does not qualify as a domestically controlled
REIT, a non-U.S. stockholders sale of ARC stock nonetheless will generally not
be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI, provided that (a) the
ARC stock owned is of a class that is regularly traded, as defined by
applicable Treasury Department regulations, on an established securities
market, and (b) the selling non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or
constructively, 5% or less of ARCs outstanding stock of that class at all
times during a specified testing period. If gain on the sale of ARC stock were subject to taxation
under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. stockholder would be subject to the same treatment
as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, subject to applicable
alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of
non-resident alien individuals, and the purchaser of the stock could be
required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the
IRS. Gain from the sale of ARC stock that would not otherwise be
subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a
non-U.S. stockholder in two cases: (a) if the non-U.S. stockholders
investment in ARC stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business
conducted by such 172 non-U.S. stockholder,
the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S.
stockholder with respect to such gain, or (b) if the non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for
183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the
United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on
the individual s capital gain. Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting ARC will report to its U.S. stockholders and the IRS the
amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of any tax
withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. stockholder may be subject
to backup withholding with respect to dividends paid unless the holder is a
corporation or comes within other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number or social
security number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding
and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding
rules. A U.S. stockholder that does not provide his or her correct taxpayer
identification number or social security number may also be subject to
penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. In
addition, ARC may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain
distribution to any U.S. stockholder who fails to certify their non-foreign status. ARC must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S.
stockholder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld
with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required.
Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may
also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. stockholder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax
treaty. A non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to backup withholding unless
applicable certification requirements are met. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC stock within the
United States is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting
unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a
non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to
know that the beneficial owner is a United States person) or the holder
otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of ARC
stock conducted through certain United States related financial intermediaries
is subject to information reporting (but not backup withholding) unless the
financial intermediary has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial
owner is a non-U.S. stockholder and specified conditions are met or an
exemption is otherwise established. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holders U.S. federal income tax
liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. State, Local and Foreign Taxes ARC and its subsidiaries and stockholders may be subject to
state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in
which it or they transact business, own property or reside. ARC owns interests
in properties located in a number of jurisdictions, and may be required to file
tax returns in certain of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax
treatment of ARC and its stockholders may not conform to the U.S. federal
income tax treatment discussed above. Any foreign taxes incurred by ARC would
not pass through to stockholders as a credit against their U.S. federal income
tax liability. Prospective stockholders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign income and
other tax laws on an investment in ARCs stock. 173 Merrill
Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated was the initial purchaser for the original offering of the notes
in private placements. We were advised by the initial purchaser that it sold
the notes to qualified institutional buyers, as defined in Rule 144A
under the Securities Act, in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. The notes and the shares of ARC common
stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes that may be offered pursuant to
this prospectus are being offered by the selling securityholders, which
includes their transferees, distributees, pledgees or donees or their
successors. The
following table sets forth information with respect to the selling securityholders
and the principal amounts of notes and ARC common stock beneficially owned by
each selling securityholder that may be offered pursuant to this prospectus. The
information is based on information provided to us by or on behalf of the
selling securityholders on or prior to October 21, 2005. The selling securityholders may offer all, some or
none of the notes or the ARC common stock into which the notes are convertible.
Because the selling securityholders may offer all or some portion of the notes or
common stock, we cannot estimate the amount of the notes or common stock that
will be held by the selling securityholders after any of these sales. Information
concerning other selling securityholders will be set forth in prospectus
supplements or, if appropriate, post-effective amendments to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, from time to time, if required. The
percentage of notes outstanding beneficially owned by each selling
securityholder is based on $96.6 million aggregate principal amount of notes
outstanding. For the
purposes of the following table, the number of shares of ARC common stock
beneficially owned has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of
the Exchange Act, and such information is not necessarily indicative of
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under Rule 13d-3, beneficial
ownership includes any shares as to which a selling securityholder has sole or
shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which that selling
securityholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this
prospectus through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other rights.
The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes
shown in the table assumes conversion of the full amount of notes held by each
selling securityholder at an initial conversion rate of 69.8812 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and a cash payment in lieu of
r:avoid;text-align:right;">4,918 309 835 5,227 6,062 145 Feb-04 No selling
securityholder named in the table below beneficially owns two percent or more of ARCs common stock, based
on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding on July 27, 2005. None
of the selling securityholders currently listed in the following table has, or
within the past three years has had, any position, office or other material
relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates. 174 Principal Amount of Notes(1) Number of Shares of Common Stock(1)(2) Selling Security Holder Beneficially Owned Percentage Chalet
City Crowley, TX 3,757 808 4,573 921 808 5,494 6,302 571 May-98 Chalet
North Apopka, FL 5,646 1,275 7,044 3,481 Beneficially Percentage of ARC CC
Convertible Arbitrage, Ltd.(4) 2,500,000 2.59 174,703 0.43 Mohican VCA Master Fund, Ltd. 750,000 0.78 52,411 1,275 10,525
0.13 Frontpoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P.(5) 1,500,000 1.55 104,822 0.26 11,800 1,249 Dec-01 Chambersburg
I & II Chambersburg, PA 167 NFJ Dividend, Premium & Interest Strategy Fund 2,500,000 2.59 174,703 0.43 52 167 1,032 1,199
Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income
Fund 7,500,000 7.76 19 Jun-04 Chelsea Sayre, PA 1.28 610 125 738 97 125 835 960 13 Jun-04 Chisholm
Creek Nicholas Applegate U.S. Convertible & Income
Fund II 6,500,000 6.73 454,228 1.11 Vicis Capital Master Fund 5,000,000 5.18 349,406 0.85 All other holders of notes or future transferees,
pledgees, donees, assignees or successors of any such holders(6) 70,350,000 72.83 4,916,142 (7) 12.00 &;width:6.0pt;">
Wichita, KS 2,200 667 3,855 663 667 4,518
(1) 5,185 126 Feb-04 Cimmaron
Village Cheyenne, WY 2,091 431 3,075 (2) For
purposes of presenting the number of shares of our common stock beneficially
owned by holders of notes, we assume an exchange rate of 69.8812 shares of ARC
common stock per each $1,000 principal amount of notes (the initial exchange
rate), which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately
$14.31 per share of ARC common stock, and a cash payment in lieu of the
issuance of any fractional share interest. However, the conversion price is
subject to adjustment as described under Description of NotesExchange RightsExchange
Rate Adjustments. As a result, the number of shares of ARC common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes, and as a consequence, the number of shares
beneficially owned by the holders of notes, may increase or decrease in the
future. (3) Percentages
based on 40,956,581 shares of ARC common stock outstanding as of July 27,
2005. (4) Selling
securityholder has identified itself as an affiliate of a broker-dealer. Each
such selling securityholder has informed us that: (a) such selling
securityholder purchased its notes in the ordinary course of business, and (b) at
the time the notes were purchased, the selling securityholder had no agreements
or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the
notes. (5) FrontPoint
Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC is the general partner of FrontPoint
Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P. FrontPoint Partners LLC is the managing member
of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC and as such has voting and
dispositive power over the securities held by the fund. Philip Duff, W.
Gillespie Caffray and Paul Ghaffari are members of the board of managers of
FrontPoint Partners LLC and are the sole members of the management committee.
Messrs. Duff, Caffray and Ghaffari and FrontPoint Partners LLC and
FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC each disclaim beneficial
ownership of the securities held by the fund except for their pecuniary
interest therein. (6) We
are unable to provide the names of certain holders of notes and/or ARC common
stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at this time because they have not
provided us with information and/or their notes are evidenced by a global note
that has been deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede &
Co., as DTCs nominee. Information concerning any such holders who are not
listed in the above table will be set forth in post-effective amendments from
time to time, if and when required. (7) Assumes
that any other holder of notes or any future transferee from any such holder
does not beneficially own any of ARCs common stock other than the shares of
ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes at the initial exchange
rate. 175 We are
registering the notes and shares on behalf of the selling securityholders. The
selling securityholders and their successors, which includes their transferees,
distributees, pledgees or donees or their successors, may sell the notes and
the underlying common stock directly to purchasers or through underwriters,
broker-dealers or agents. Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive
compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the
selling securityholders or the purchasers. These discounts, concessions or
commissions may0pt;width:7.7pt;">
76 431 3,151 3,582 The notes and the underlying ARC common stock may be sold
in one or more transactions: · at fixed prices; · at prevailing market prices
at the time of sale; · at prices related to such
prevailing market prices; · at varying prices determined
at the time of sale; or · at negotiated prices. Such sales may be effected in transactions in the following
manner (which may involve crosses or block transactions): · on any national securities
exchange or quotation; · 431 Oct-96 Cloverleaf Moline, IL 4,669 789 4,596 in the over-the-counter
market; · in transactions otherwise
than on such exchanges or services or in the over-the-counter market; · through the writing of
options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
or · through the settlement of
short sales. 245 789 4,841 5,630 560 From time
to time, one or more of the selling securityholders may distribute, devise,
gift, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in some or all of the
securities owned by them. Any such distributees, devisees or donees will be
deemed to be selling securityholders. Any such pledges, secured parties or
persons to whom the securities have been hypothecated will, upon foreclosure in
the event of default, be deemed to be selling securityholders. The
aggregate proceeds to the selling securityholders from the sale of the notes or
underlying ARC common stock will be the purchase price of the notes or ARC
common stock, less any discounts and commissions. A selling securityholder
reserves the right to accept and, together with its agents, to reject, any
proposed purchase of notes or common stock to be made directly or through
agents. We will not receive any of the proceeds from this offering. ARCs
underlying common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. We do not
intend to list the notes for trading on any national securities exchange or on
the Nasdaq National Market. We cannot guarantee that any trading market will
develop for the notes. The notes
and underlying ARC common stock may be sold in some states only through
registered or licensed brokers or dealers. The selling securityholders and any
underwriters, broker-dealers or agents that 176
Dec-96 College
Park Orlando, FL 2,211 397 2,061 51 397 2,112 2,509 199 Sep-98 Collingwood
MHP Horseheads, NY 673 98 615 99 98 714 812 10 Jun-04 Colonial
Gardens Manhattan, KS 3,688 938 6,132 693 938 6,825 7,763 823 Apr-98 Columbia
Heights Grand Forks, ND 6,880" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">participate in the sale of the notes and common stock into
which the notes are convertible may be underwriters within the meaning of Section 2(11)
of the Securities Act. Any discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they
earn on any resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and commissions
under the Securities Act. Selling securityholders who are underwriters within
the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. The selling
securityholders have acknowledged that they understand their obligations to
comply, and have agreed to comply, with the prospectus delivery requirements
and other provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the
respective rules thereunder, particularly Regulation M thereunder, in
connection with any offering of the securities offered hereby. In
addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale
pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act may be
sold under Rule 144 or Rule 144A rather than pursuant to this
prospectus. A selling securityholder may not sell any notes or ARC common stock
described herein and may not transfer, devise or gift such securities by other
means not described in this prospectus. If
required, the specific notes or common stock to be sold, the names of the
selling securityholders, the respective purchase prices and public offering
prices, the names of any agent, dealer or underwriter, and any applicable
commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will be set forth
in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if appropriate, a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Pursuant to
the registration rights agreement filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, we and the selling
securityholders will be indemnified by each other against certain liabilities,
including certain liabilities under the Securities Act or will be entitled to
contribution in connection with these liabilities. We have
agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses incidental to the registration,
offering and sale of the notes and underlying common stock to the public, other
than applicable transfer taxes and commissions, fees and discounts of
underwriters, brokers, dealers and agents. We have agreed to maintain the effectiveness of this
registration statement until the holders of the notes and the common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes are able to sell all such securities
immediately without restriction pursuant to the volume limitations of Rule 144(k) under
the Securities Act. We may suspend sales under the registration statement upon
notice to the selling securityholders in order to update the registration
statement or otherwise comply with federal securities laws. 177 The validity of the notes was passed upon for us by
Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C., Denver, Colorado. The validity of the
shares of ARC common stock issuable upon exchange of the notes was passed upon
for us by Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland. Certain tax matters will be passed
upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New
York. The
consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities LP as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004 included in this prospectus have been so included
in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing. The
consolidated financial statements of Affordable Residential Communities Inc.
incorporated in this prospectus by reference to ARCs Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been so incorporated in reliance
on the reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. 178 F-2 Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 F-3 Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 F-4 Consolidated
Statements of Partners Capital for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003
1,218 7,083 479 1,218 7,562 8,780 206 Feb-04 Commerce
Heights Commerce City, CO 930 195 1,160 14 195 Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 F-6 F-8 Unaudited
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004 F-38 F-39 Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30,
2005 F-40 F-41 Schedule IIIReal Estate and Related Depreciation
as of December 31, 2004 F-61 F-1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the
Partners of Affordable Residential Communities LP: In our opinion, the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners capital and cash flows present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Affordable Residential Communities LP and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion the accompanying
financial statement schedule Schedule III presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of
these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP Denver, Colorado October 25,
2005 F-2 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
LP December 31, 2004 2003 Assets Rental
and other property, net $ 1,532,780 $ 863,515 Assets
held for sale 54,123 44,362 Cash and
cash equivalents 39,802 1,174 1,369 133 Jun-98 Connelly
Terrace Connelly, NY 2,377 426 2,445 252 426 2,697 3,123 206 Sep-02 26,626 Restricted
cash 13,669 Tenant,
notes and other receivables, net 19,029 8,468 Inventory 11,230 3,878 Loan
origination costs, net 14,403 11,921 Loan
reserves 31,019 32,414 Goodwill 85,264 86,127 Lease
intangibles and customer relationships, net 19,106 10,987 Prepaid
expenses and other assets 6,476 24,102 Total
assets $
Connie
Jean Jacksonville, FL 698 98 577 353 98 930 1,028 195 May-00 Cottonwood
Grove Plano, TX 3,765 741 5,340 345 1,813,232 $ 1,126,069 Liabilities and Partners
Capital Notes
payable and preferred interest $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 Liabilities
related to assets held for sale 741 5,685 6,426 787 Mar-98 Country
Club Crossing Altoona, IA 3,350 485 2,687 29,516 16,975 Accounts
payable and accrued expenses 37,877 19,828 Distributions
payable 15,505 Tenant
deposits and other liabilities 1,859 485 4,546 5,031 1,201 Jan-99
12,773 7,655 Total
liabilities 1,097,293 817,852 Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) Partners capital (see Note 4) Preferred
OP units 144,250 Common OP units: General partner 539,382 265,578 Limited partners 32,307 42,639 715,939 308,217 Country
Club Manor Imperial, MO 3,878 709 4,049 1,622 709 Total liabilities and partners capital $ 1,813,232 5,671 6,380
$ 1,126,069 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-3 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES
LP For the Year Ended 2004 2003 1,224 Sep-99 Country
Club Mobile Salt Lake City, UT 9,866 1,654 9,404
2002 Revenue Rental
income $ 187,267 $ 125,915 $ 92,610 Sales of
manufactured homes 15,221 21,681 1,195 1,654 10,599 12,253 1,931 Aug-00 Countryside
(CO) Greeley, CO 3,884 31,942 Utility
and other income 20,065 15,599 11,942 Net
consumer finance income 104 Total
revenue 222,657 163,195 136,494 600 3,418 1,010 600 4,428 5,028 1,065 Mar-99
Expenses Countryside
(KS) Hays, KS Property
operations 75,150 44,295 33,341 Real
estate taxes 16,621 10,247 6,633 Cost of
manufactured homes sold 18,267 18,357 25,826 Retail
home sales, finance, insurance and other operations 8,198 7,382
1,175 467 3,358 8,582 Property
management 7,127 5,527 4,105 General
and administrative 29,361 16,855 396 467 3,754 4,221 533 Oct-98 Countryside
(OK) Stillwater, OK 983 191 2,010 (76 ) 191 1,934 2,125 303 Apr-98 Countryside
Village (TN) Columbia, TN 3,820 1,089
13,087 Initial
public offering costs 4,417 Early
termination of debt 16,685 Depreciation
and amortization 72,014 46,467 37,058 Real
estate and retail asset impairment 3,591 1,385 Goodwill
impairment 863 13,557 Interest
expense 56,892 57,386 43,804 Total
expenses 309,186 207,901 185,993 Interest
income (1,616 ) (1,439 ) 7,165 1,122 1,089 ) Loss from
continuing operations (84,913 ) (43,267 ) (48,109 ) Income
from discontinued operations 8,287 9,376 1,007 1,915 31 Cowboy Pocatello, ID 2,502 587 3,520 374 587 3,894 4,481 479 1,040 Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations (8,549 ) 3,333 Net loss (91,547 ) (39,903 ) (47,069 ) Preferred unit distributions (9,752 ) Oct-96 Creekside Seagoville, TX 4,104
Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 908 4,729 2,087 Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders General partner $ (95,445 ) $ (34,386 ) $ (40,818 ) Limited partners
908 6,816 7,724 607 Apr-97 (5,854 ) (5,517 )
Creekside
Estates Seagoville, TX 1,515 242 1,361 870 242 2,231 2,473 236 Jun-97 Crescentwood
Village Sandy, UT 7,847 (6,251 ) $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Net loss
per common OP unit from continuing operations $ (2.34 ) $ (2.20 ) $ (2.94 ) Income (loss) per common OP unit from discontinued
operations (0.17 ) 0.17 0.06 Net loss per common OP unit $ (2.51 ) $ (2.03 ) $ (2.88 ) Weighted average OP units outstanding 7,192 330 1,255 7,522 8,777 1,341 Aug-00 Crestview Sayre, PA 775 120 749 129 120 878 998 14 Jun-04 Crestview Stillwater, OK
40,413 19,699 16,353 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-4 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Common OP Unitholders General Limited Preferred Total Balance January 1, 2002 $ 158,957 $ 62 $ $ 159,019 Sales of
OP units 33,760 33,760 OP Units
retired in the Reorganization (62 ) 1,750 445 2,617 651 445 3,267 3,713 107 Feb-04 CV-Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL 13,139 (62 ) OP Units
issued in the Reorganization 137,652 64,820 202,472 Transfer
from limited partners to general partner resulting from issuance of OP units 10,413 (10,413 )
2,840 16,699 1,337 Net loss (40,818 ) (6,251 ) (47,069 ) Balance
December 31, 2002 299,964 48,156 348,120 Net loss (34-break-after:avoid;"> 2,840 18,036 20,876 513 Feb-04 Cypress
Shores Winter Haven, FL 3,023 660 3,950
) (5,517 ) (39,903 ) Balance
December 31, 2003 265,578 42,639 308,217 Issuance
of common OP units 410,724 410,724 Issuance
of preferred OP units 144,250 144,250 Restricted
common units issued, net of current year amortization 199 199 Forfeiture
of restricted common OP units 211 660 4,161 4,821 319 Sep-02 Deerhurst Wendell, NC 2,929 525 2,997 1,432 525 4,429 4,954 841 (150 ) (150 ) Redemption
of OP units (125 ) (125 Sep-00 Deerpointe Jacksonville, FL 2,250 391 2,233 2,454 391 4,687 5,078 1,044 Feb-99 ) Transfer
of capital 1,737 (1,737 Denton, TX 3,633 680 4,650 728 680
) Distributions
to OP unitholders (44,469 ) (2,616 ) (47,085 ) Net loss (95,445 5,378 6,058 680 May-96 Desert
Palms Hemet, CA 4,960 900 4,424 1,674 900 6,098 6,998 456 (5,854 ) (101,299 ) Other
comprehensive incomemark to market of interest rate swap 1,208 1,208 Comprehensive
loss
Jul-02 Dynamic DeSoto, TX 2,803 518 2,737 548 (100,091 ) Balance December 31, 2004 $ 539,382 $ 32,307 $ 144,250 $ 715,939 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-5 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP For the Year Ended Decem"1" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 518 3,285 3,803 302 May-97 Dynamic II DeSoto, TX 2,797 375 2,235 1,073 375 3,308 3,683 388 Jul-01 Eagle
Creek Tyler, TX 2004 2003 2002 Cash flow
from operating activities Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 72,014 46,467 37,058
260 2,126 273 260 2,399 2,659 70 Adjustments to fair value for interest rate caps 241 1,561 OP unitholders grant compensation expense Feb-04 Eagle
Ridge 10,120 Preferred unit distribution declared 8,966 PPU distributions declared 786 Non-cash REIT IPO related costs 389 Early termination of debt 10,358 Retail home sales impairment and other expense 1,385 Real estate asset impairment 3,591 Goodwill impairment 863 Lewisville, TX 4,683 765 4,404 793 765 5,197 5,962 510 Feb-99 Eastern
Villa Stillwater, OK 1,107 294 1,914 Depreciation included in income from discontinued
operations 3,134 2,613 2,026 (Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations 8,549 (3,333 ) Rent expense related to vacated office space
255 294 2,169 2,463 321 864 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions 9,322 Mar-98 Eastview Gillette, WY 3,141 507 3,597 729 507 2,596 7,148 Net cash provided by op;width:4.55pt;">
4,326 4,833 572 Dec-97 F-62 Easy
Living Lawrence, KS 4,392 27,034 10,689 14,281 Cash flow
from investing activities Acquisition of Hometown communities (507,136 ) Acquisition of communities and manufactured homes
702 4,198 1,547 702 (87,693 ) (34,288 )
5,745 6,447 1,550 Mar-00 El
Caudillo Wichita, KS 731 179 1,241 258 179 1,499 (121,611 ) Proceeds from community sales 36,922 14,879 Deposits and deferred acquisition costs on purchase of
Hometown assets (15,559 ) Community improvements and equipment purchases (49,708 ) (12,725 ) (15,862 ) Net cash used in investing activities (607,615 ) 197 Dec-98 El Dorado (47,693 ) (137,473 ) Cash flow
from financing activities Cash flow
from REIT IPO
Sherman, TX 847 148 1,109 196 148 1,305 1,453 165 Feb-97 El Lago Fort Worth, TX Common stock offering 438,078 Preferred stock offering 125,000 Common stock offering expenses (37,421 ) Preferred stock offering expenses (5,892 ) Cash flow
from REIT IPO related financing transactions Debt issued in the financing transactions 500,000 Debt paid in the financing transactions 409 1,934 274 409 2,208 2,617 255 Jan-97 El Lago II Fort Worth, TX 853 201 1,130 286 201 1,416 1,617 156 Apr-97 Encantada pt 0pt 0pt;width:42.85pt;">
(439,048 ) Payment of loan origination costs (8,122 ) Las Cruces, NM 7,187 1,801 9,558 Release of restricted cash 12,278 Release of loan reserves 19,089 New loan
reserves (14,247 ) See notes to consolidated financial statements F-6 AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP For the Year Ended December 31, 96 1,801 9,653 11,455 273 Feb-04 Enchanted
Village Alton, IL 5,600 1,275 2004 2003 2002 Cash flow from the Reorganization:
7,460 Debt
issued in the Reorganization 578,000 Debt paid
in the Reorganization (431,165 ) Redemption
of Limited Partnership interests (112,966 ) Payment
of loan costs (13,365 ) Net
release of restricted cash 2,609 Net
release of loan reserves 4,695 Other (4,678 ) Proceeds
from the issuance of common OP units 33,760 Deferred
common and preferred OP unit issuance costs (1,026 ) Proceeds
from issuance of debt 96,421 49,038 126,119 Deferred
debt issuance costs 3,540 1,275 11,000 12,275 2,613 Repayment
of debt (42,660 ) (25,356 Englewood
Village Cheyenne, WY 1,131 195 1,042 154 195 1,196 1,391 118 Oct-96 Evergreen
Village ) (14,416 ) Payment
of common distributions (33,563 ) Payment
of preferred distributions (7,247 ) Payment
of partnership preferred distributions (524 ) Repurchase
of OP units (125 ) Restricted
cash 1,391 (240 ) (1,906 ) Loan
reserves (3,447 ) 6,867 (28,185 ) Loan
origination costs (6,204 ) (3,894 ) (715 )
Sioux City, IA 4,632 1,439 9,075 1,222 1,439 10,297 11,736 1,249 Dec-98 Evergreen
Village Pleasant View, UT 4,146 1,041 6,158 593,757 25,389 137,787 Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 13,176 (11,615 ) 14,595 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 26,626 38,241 23,646 Cash and
cash equivalents, end of period $ 39,802 $ 26,626 $ 38,241 Non-cash financing and investing transactions: Debt
assumed in connection with acquisitions $ 96,898 $ 4,294 $ 5,944 Preferred
OP units issued in connection with acquisitions 25,142 Distributions
declared but not paid 13,524 Accrual
of loan origination costs
748 1,041 6,906 7,948 OP units issued
in the Reorganization 64,820 Common
stock issued in the Reorganization
182 Feb-04 Ewing
Trace 137,652 Limited
Partnership debt assumed in the Reorganization 233,915 Supplemental cash flow information: Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 56,765 $ 56,941 36,077 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-7 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP 1. Business, Liquidity and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Affordable
Residential Communities LP (formerly Affordable Residential Communities IV, LP)
(the Partnership, the Operating Partnership or OP) is a limited
partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning and operation
of manufactured home communities, the rental of manufactured homes, the retail
sale of manufactured homes and other related businesses. We were organized in July of
1998 and operate primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is
Affordable Residential Communities Inc. (ARC or REIT) (formerly known
as ARC IV REIT Inc.). As
described in Note 2, on May 2, 2002, ARC completed the acquisition of
Affordable Residential Communities, L.P. I (LP I), Affordable Residential
Communities, L.P., II (LP II), Affordable Residential Communities, L.P., III
(LP III) (collectively, LP I, LP II, and LP III are the Limited Partnerships)
and their respective subsidiaries and certain of the assets and subsidiaries of
ARC Holdings Limited Liability Company (Holdings) (the Reorganization). As of December 31,
2004, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of 13 communities classified
as discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 63,661 homesites
(net of 2,566 homesites classified as discontinued operations) in 27 states
with occupancy of 81.5%. Our five largest markets are Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas,
with 11.4% of our total homesites; Atlanta, Georgia, with 7.8% of our total
homesites; Salt Lake City, Utah, with 6.0% of our total homesites; the Front
Range of Colorado, with 5.2% of our total homesites; and Kansas
City-Lawrence-Topeka, Kansas, with 3.8% of our total homesites. We also conduct
a retail home sales business. On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its initial public offering (IPO) of 22.3 million
shares of common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares
sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock
priced at $25.00 per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock
and preferred stock were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and
before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592
shares of co>Des Moines, IA 1,629 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Basis of presentation The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of our accounts but
the results of operations of the manufactured home communities acquired only
for the periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. We have eliminated all
significant inter-entity balances and transactions. F-8 The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported
amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate actual
results may differ from previously estimated amounts. We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to
conform to current year presentation. Rental and Other Property We carry
rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize
significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset
quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their
estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as
incurred. Depreciation is computed primarily
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The
estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are
primarily as follows: Asset Class Estimated Useful Manufactured home communities and improvements 10 to 30 630 3,582 85
630 3,667 4,297 877 Apr-99 Falcon
Farms Port Byron, IL 4,100 798 4,793 808 798 5,602 6,399 148 Feb-04 Five Seasons
Davenport Davenport, IA 774 4,518 727 774 5,245 6,019 146 Feb-04 Forest
Creek Elkhart, IN 4,250 765 4,434 417 765 4,851 5,616 143 Buildings 10 to 20 Rental homes 10 Furniture and other equipment 5 Computer software and hardware 3 In June 2002,
we changed our estimate of the depreciable lives of our communities from
20 years to 30 years to conform to industry experience regarding the
estimated useful life of manufactured home communities, improvements and
buildings. The change resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense by
approximately $7.3 million or $0.45 per unit. Subsequent
to December 31, 2004, we changed our estimate of the depreciable life of
our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years. Homes will now be
depreciated to an estimated salvage value after 3 years of service in our
rental home portfolio. This change was made to conform to our intent to sell
homes from our rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the
repairs and maintenance costs typically incurred on older homes. This change
did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. We evaluate the recoverability of our investment in rental
property whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full asset
recoverability is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental
property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected
net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be
impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the assets
carrying amount to determine if a writedown is required. If this review
indicates that the assets carrying amount will not be fully recoverable, we
would reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value.
During 2004, we recorded an impairment charge on rental property of
approximately $500,000 (see Note 12). For the years ended December 31,
2003 and December 31, 2002, we recorded no impairment charges. F-9 The Partnership considers a community to be a discontinued
operation when: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset,
supported by a Board resolution granting approval to proceed with the sale;
(ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition
subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets;
(iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete
the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the asset
is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition
as a completed sale, within one year; (v) the asset is being actively
marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair
value; and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is
unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan
will be withdrawn. In accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, SFAS, No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we measure each
of our assets held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value,
less cost to sell at the balance sheet date and re-cast any applicable balances
and corresponding liabilities related to the communities identified in all
comparable periods presented. Depreciation of the assets held for sale, if
applicable, is suspended at the date of the determination of discontinuance.
Interest and other expenses attributable to the liabilities of the communities
classified as held for sale continues to be accrued. The results of operations of
the assets sold and those classified as held for sale are reported as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognize any estimated
losses on the sales of communities in the period in which the properties are
discontinued and recognize any resulting gains on the sales of communities when
realized. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the expected
disposal, the expected manner and timing of that disposal, and, if not
separately presented on the face of the balance sheet, the carrying amounts of
the major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal
group is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We disclose in the
notes to our financial statements (and on the face of the income statement) the
gain or loss recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and, if
applicable, the amounts of revenue and pretax profit or loss reported in
discontinued operations. We disclose, if applicable, in the notes to our
financial statements the segment in which the long-lived asset is reported under. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include all cash andak-after:avoid;"> Feb-04 Forest
Park Queensbury, NY Restricted Cash and Loan Reserves Restricted cash and loan reserves represent reserves
established pursuant to the debt agreements as described in Note 6. Notes Receivable Notes receivable from sales of manufactured homes or
assumed in connection with acquisitions are generally collateralized by
manufactured homes located in our communities and is recorded at face value
less allowances for bad debt less a market discount which the Company feels approximates
the fair market value of the note. 1,996 590 3,314 1,340 590 4,654 5,244 507 Feb-02 We maintain allowances for bad debts on tenant receivables
and notes receivable. We fully reserve amounts due from tenants greater than
sixty days past due. We establish reserves for notes receivable based on
managements periodic review of specific notes considered wholly or partially
uncollectible, plus an amount for estimated future uncollectible amounts based
on historical experience. At December 31, F-10 2004 and 2003, approximately
$1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, was reserved for tenant
and notes receivables. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, we charged $3.9 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, to bad debt expense. Inventory Inventory consists of new and used manufactured homes held
for sale, including costs and materials associated with preparing the units for
sale. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is based on
specific identification reduced, as applicable, by dealer volume rebates earned
from manufacturers ($14,000 and $101,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively). Loan Origination Costs We capitalize loan origination costs associated with
financing. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the effective interest method, over the repayment term of the
loans. We amortized $5.9 million, $3.2 million and $4.1 million
of loan origination costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization. The
charge in 2002 includes $1.6 million for previously incurred loan origination
costs of debt paid in the Reorganization. Accumulated amortization was
$6.4 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
Reorganization completed on May 2, 2002. We periodically assess and adjust
the value of the goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we
recorded an impairment charge of $863,000 related to our insurance business as
our insurance business estimated fair value was less than its carrying value as
of December 31, 2004. For the year end December 31, 2002, we recorded
an impairment change of $13.6 million. For additional discussion, see
Note 2. Lease Intangibles and Customer Relationships We establish the value of lease
intangibles and customer relationships at the date of acquisition of a
community. We amortize lease intangibles and customer relationships related to
community acquisitions on a straight-line basis over the estimated time period
that a resident lives in the community (five years). We amortize lease
intangibles and customer relationships related to acquisitions of rental homes
on a straight-line basis over the lease term (one year). The acquired community
customer relationships and rental home customer relationships are amortized on
a straight-line basis since we cannot reliably determine the pattern of
economic benefit associated with the individual contracts comprising the
intangible assets. We do not have sufficient historical or industry data to reliably
estimate the tenure of an individual customer or to pool customer contracts on
a homogeneous basis as a basis to amortize the intangible assets in a manner
other than straight line. Future amortization of lease intangibles and customer
relationship intangible assets are as follows (in thousands): 2005 $ 6,087 2006 6,003 2007 3,827 2008 2,787 2009 402 Total $ 19,106 F-11 Accumulated amortization was $13.3 million and
$7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Impairment of Intangible Assets We combine our finite-lived intangible assets, which
consist primarily of lease and customer intangibles, with other assets located
in each community (prid>
Four
Seasons Fayetteville, GA 1,991 962 5,678 1,086 962 6,764 7,726 177 Feb-04 Foxhall
Village Raleigh, NC 6,984 1,518 8,474 1,162 1,518 9,636 11,154 Prepaid
Expenses and Other Assets Included in
prepaid expenses and other assets are prepaid insurance and other prepaid
expenses, as well as earnest money deposits which are treated as deposits until
the underlying transactions are complete. Prepaid
expenses and other assets as of December 31, 2004 of $6.5 million were
lower than the $24.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2003,
primarily due to $17.5 million of earnest money deposits held in escrow at
December 31, 2003 related to the Hometown acquisition. Revenue Recognition We
recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from
residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are
generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident
and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home
renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual agreement
between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and recognize
it in income when earned. We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we
receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title,
possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no
further obligations to perform significant additional activities. Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization We capitalize our interest costs (using our average cost of
borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on
development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities
through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with SFAS
No. 34, Capitalization of Interest
and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs
and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively.
The long-lived assets on which we capitalize interest include general
construction activities in our communities, manufactured homes, and, in the
case of the communities acquired in the Hometown acquisition, the cost of the
vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making improvements and placing a
manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized $3.9 million of
interest and internal costs during 2004. No significant interest or internal
costs were capitalized during 2003 and 2002. Income Taxes We are a partnership for tax purposes and do not pay
federal or state income taxes. Our income is taxed to our members in their
individual returns, and we therefore do not record an income tax provision. F-12 Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair value of our debt was approximately
$1,028.6 million and $813.0 million at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. The fair value of our other financial instruments
approximates their carrying vales at December 31, 2004 and 2003. Interest Rate Caps and Swaps We use
derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging exposures to
fluctuations in interest rates. As required under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, we record all of our derivative instruments in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. For a derivative designated as a
cash flow hedge, we initially report the effective portion of the derivatives
gain or loss as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and
subsequently reclassify it into earnings when the forecasted transaction
affects earnings. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss
associated with a cash flow hedge in earnings immediately. During 2004, we
entered into a $100.0 million interest rate swap agreement with an
unrelated third party effectively fixing the interest rate on
$100.0 million of our variable rate debt at 5.06%. The swap has been
designated as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. At December 31,
2004, $1.2 million of unrealized gain related to this derivative
instrument has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the
accompanying December 31, 2004 balance sheet. We further manage our exposure to interest rate risk
through the use of interest rate caps which protect us from movements in
interest rates above specified levels. We immediately recognize in earnings the
change in the fair value of gains or losses associated with interest rate caps.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded interest
charges of $241,000, $115,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, related to
the change in the fair value of the interest rate caps. At December 31,
2004 and 2003 the carrying value of our interest rate caps is $7,000 and zero,
respectively. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(a component of partners capital) as of December 31, 2004 represent
unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap which qualifies as a cash flow
hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Our
comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
$100.1 million. There were no unrecognized gains or losses related to our
interest rate swap during 2003 and 2002, and therefore, our comprehensive loss
for 2003 and 2002, is equal to our net loss to Common OP Unitholders as
reported on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. OP Unit Grants We have included a charge of $10.1 million in general and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 representing
the value of 530,000 Common OP Units we granted February 18, 2004 under
our 2003 equity incentive plan that vested at the date of grant. We valued the
units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO. In
addition, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP Units that vest over five
years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited.
In October 2004, an additional 37,500 of restricted OP Units were
forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the remaining 15,000
outstanding restricted OP Units as unearned compensation on the balance sheet
(a component of partners capital) and are amortizing the balance ratably over
the vesting period. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be
F-13 recognized
in financial statements based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. We will apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting
period beginning July 1, 2005 at the same time as ARC. SFAS 123R
covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including options,
restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights,
and employee share purchase plans. We are still evaluating the impacts of
adopting SFAS 123R upon our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. On May 2,
2002, ARC completed the Reorganization in which each of the Limited
Partnerships was merged with a separate subsidiary of ARC (ARC and the Limited
Partnerships hereinafter collectively referred to as the ARC Partnerships).
Also as part of the Reorganization, the retail home sales, insurance and other
businesses previously conducted by the subsidiaries of ARC Holdings Limited
Liability Company (Holdings) were acquired by the Operating Partnership and
Holdings was liquidated. ARC became the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership, which then indirectly owned and operated its existing portfolio of
manufactured home communities and the Limited Partnerships portfolios of
manufactured home communities, as well as the other businesses previously
conducted by the subsidiaries of Holdings. As a result
of the Reorganization, the limited partners received cash ($113.0 million),
partnership units in the Operating Partnership paired with 1.9268 shares of
special voting shares of ARC par value $.01 per share (collectively, 2.7
million partnership units and special voting stock, hereinafter collectively
referred to as OP Units) and common units (1.6 million units). As a result of
the combination of Holdings subsidiaries with the Operating Partnership,
Holdings received shares of ARCs common stock (4.2 million shares) and
distributed them to its owners upon the liquidation of Holdings. In
connection with the Reorganization, several of our subsidiaries incurred fixed
rate mortgage debt of $310 million and floating rate mortgage debt of
$193 million and issued $75 million out of a commitment to issue a
preferred interest of $150 million. The proceeds of these borrowings were
used to repay existing indebtedness of certain subsidiaries of the ARC
Partnerships, fund the cash portion of the consideration to the limited
partners of the Limited Partnerships in the Reorganization, pay fees and
expenses related to the Reorganization and provide working capital. We have used the purchase method to account for the
combination of the businesses and assets of the Limited Partnerships and
Holdings. We have allocated the aggregate purchase price of the businesses and
assets of Holdings and the Limited Partnerships to tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values as follows (in
thousands): Purchase Purchase price, including transaction costs $ 328,551 Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed: Rental and othent-size:7.5pt;">263 Feb-04 Frieden
Manor Schuylkill Haven, PA 1,816 582 3,480 188 582 3,668 4,250
407,832 Intangible lease contracts and customer relationship
value 18,917 Other operating assets and liabilities 36,033 Debt assumed (233,915 ) 228,867 Goodwill $ 99,684 We
allocated this goodwill to the real estate reporting unit ($85.3 million),
retail home sales and finance reporting unit ($12.1 million) and insurance
reporting unit ($2.3 million). At December 31, 2002, F-14 we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using
capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value the reporting units. As
a result, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the retail home sales
business $12.1 million and the insurance business of $1.4 million.
The impairment for retail home sales business arose as a result of a worsening
of conditions since the Reorganization including adverse operating performance
in our retail home sale business, the retail home sales industry, the related
finance industry and the market for retail home sales businesses. The
impairment for the insurance business arose because the retail home sales
business provides a significant portion of the insurance business revenue. We
realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2003. See
Note 13 for discussion regarding 2004 impairment. We
determined the fair value of the tangible community assets (other than rental
homes discussed below) acquired in the Reorganization (which includes land,
land improvements, and buildings) by valuing the property as if it were vacant.
We then allocated the as-if-vacant value to land, land improvements and
buildings based on our determination of the relative fair values of these
assets. We
determined the as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the
expected lease-up period for individual communities (based on vacancies in the
surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the
expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual
rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants. We measure
the aggregate value of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships as the
excess of the purchase price paid for a property over the estimated fair value
of the property as-if-vacant, as set forth above. We amortize the in-place
lease value and tenant relationships for communities acquired over the
estimated life that a resident resides in the community (five years) based on
our historical experience with turnover in our communities and industry market
studies. The lease term for communities is generally month-to-month. However,
based on our own experience and industry data, the average time that a resident
remains in the community is five years based on renewals of those
month-to-month leases. We also
determined fair value for the rental manufactured homes acquired in the
Reorganization as if they were vacant. We determined the as-if-vacant fair
value of the rental homes by considering the expected lease-up period for the
home (based on lease-up history for rental homes in that community) and the
expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual
rental rates). We measured the aggregate value of the intangibles related to
rental homes, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationships, by the
purchase price paid for the rental homes (after adjusting in-place leases to
market) less the fair value of the property as-if-vacant. We amortize the
market rate adjustment, i.0pt;"> 58 Jun-04 Friendly
VillageGA Lawrenceville, GA 5,310 1,045 6,150 203 1,045 6,352 7,397 175 Feb-04 Gallant
Estates Greensboro, NC 897 158 925 390 158 1,315 1,473 184 Aug-01 Community customer relationships $ 15,708 Community in place lease value 1,709 Rental customer relationships 1,288 Rental in-place lease value 45 Rental above and below market leases 167 $ 18,917 F-15 As a
consequence of using the purchase method to account for the Reorganization, our
results of operations and financial position include all of our accounts in all
periods but include the results of operations of the businesses formerly
conducted in the Limited Partnerships and Holdings only for periods subsequent
to the Reorganization. We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information for the year ended December 31,
2002 as if the Reorganization had occurred on January 1, 2002. The pro
forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would
have occurred if the Reorganization had been consummated on January 1,
2002 (amounts in thousands): Revenue $ 176,919 Total expenses(1) $ 235,545 Interest income $ (1,543 )
Glen Acres Wichita, KS 1,513 492 2,391 329 492 $ (57,083 ) Discontinued operations $ 186 Net loss $ (56,897 ) Net loss per unit $ (3.35 ) Weighted average units outstanding 16,973 2,720 3,212 297 Jan-00 Glenview Oklahoma City, OK 310 80 865 REIT IPO
and Hometown Acquisition On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at
$19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling
stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00
per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock
were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17,
2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds
to ARC of $14.0 million. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with
its IPO were contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued
23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP Units to ARC. Also in
connection with ARCs IPO, we granted 530,000 common OP Units that vested at
the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which
ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted OP Units.
In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted OP Units were forfeited. In October 2004,
an additional 37,500 restricted OP Units were forfeited.
50 80 915 995 167 Aug-98 Golden
Rule Oklahoma City, OK 1,465 340 3,422 244 340 3,666 4,006 588 Jul-98 Concurrent
with the ARC IPO, we completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of our
mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage
debt. The new mortgage debt, at the time of the ARC IPO, was comprised of
$215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of 5.53%,
$100.7 million of 5 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of
5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt (see Note 6). Proceeds
from the ARC IPO and new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities,
repay our Rental Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued
by one of our subsidiaries. On February 18, 2004, and
subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from
Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include
26,406 F-16 homesites.
The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired consisted of the
following (in thousands): Cash purchase price $ 522,131 Debt assumed in connection with acquisition 93,139 Total purchase price $ 615,270 Golden
Triangle Coppell, TX 3,704 525 3,074
Our purchase price allocation is (in
thousands): Land $ 89,794 Rental and other property 494,734 778 525 3,852 4,377 Inventory 9,761
780 Lease intangibles 811 Customer relationships 14,496 Notes receivable Jan-00 Golden
Valley Douglasville, GA 1,420
5,674 Total purchase price allocation $ 615,270 275 1,576 901 275 2,477 2,752 67 Feb-04 Grand
Meadow Longmont, CO 2,624 555 3,149 65 555 3,214 3,769 253 Sep-02 Green
Acres Chambersburg, PA 174 51 306 1 We amortize
the lease intangibles acquired on a straight-line basis over the lease term
(one year) and the customer relationships acquired on a straight-line basis
over the estimated time period that a resident lives in the community (five
years). We assumed management of the Hometown communities prior to
our completion of the Hometown acquisition pursuant to a management agreement.
We hired all Hometown employees actively employed at the Hometown communities
on January 1, 2004, with Hometown reimbursing us for the costs associated
with such employment until we completed the acquisition. On June 30,
2004 we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY,
L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The
total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was
approximately $65.5 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt,
this acquisition was funded through the issuance of new Series B, C
and D Partnership Preferred Units (PPUs), for proceeds totaling
$33.1 million. All of the D series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were
redeemed for cash on July 6, 2004. See Note 4 for further discussion
of the PPUs. Our purchase price allocation is
(in thousands): 51 307 Land $ 9,225 Rental and other property 55,501 Inventory 803 Customer relationships 52 Other assets/liabilities, net (78 ) Total purchase price allocation $ 65,503 We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M.
acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2003. The pro forma data is not
necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we
had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2003. We have not provided
audited financial statements of Hometown for the F-17 year ended
December 31, 2003 because the results of Hometown are included in our
results for the year ended December 31, 2004 for approximately ten and one-half
months (in thousands). For the Year Ended 2004 2003 Revenue $ 236,114 $ 240,083 358 5 Jun-04 Green Cove Huntsville, AL 1,031 226 1,546 84 226 1,630 1,856 217 Total expenses $ 321,722 $ 280,474 Interest income $ (1,676 ) $ Jan-98 Green Park
South Pelham, AL (1,919 ) Loss from continuing operations $ (83,932 ) $ (38,472 ) 6,414 1,442 8,419 24 1,442
Discontinued operations $ 8,442 9,884 234 Feb-04 )>
Green
Spring Valley Raleigh, NC $ 6,055 Net loss $ (90,258 ) $ (32,417 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (100,010 ) $ (32,417 )
7,113 750 4,261 $ (2.47 ) $ (1.65 ) Weighted average units outstanding 40,413 19,699 Other
Acquisitions During the
years ended Dom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">
1,957 750 6,218 We have not
presented pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 as if these other acquisitions were made on the first day
of the year, as the effects of these other acquisitions are not material to our
financial position, results of operations or cash flow for these periods. F-18 The table below summarizes all of our manufactured home
community acquisitions for the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31,
2004. Date 1,400 Jun-99 Green
Valley Village Casper, WY 1,139
Portfolio Community Location Homesites Jan-02 NA 162 2,062 501 Sundown Clearfield, UT 200 Feb-02 NA 162 2,563 2,725 Forest Park Queensbury, NY 183 Feb-02 NA Mar-99 Gregory
Courts Honey Brook, PA 557 133
Birch Meadow Estates Wilton, NY 809 87 133 896 1,028 14 Jun-04 Hampton
Acres
64 Feb-02 NA Park DAntoine Wilton, NY DeSoto, TX 1,089 335 1,966 1,304 335 3,270 3,605 358 Jun-02 Harmony
Road Fort Collins, CO 13,645 18 Apr-02 NA Valley Verde Las Cruces, NM 220 Apr-02 NA Arbor Lake Grinnell, IA 2,738 15,518 40 May-02 (288 ) 4,206 2,450 19,724 22,174 4,888 Nov-98 NA Riverside West Valley City, UT 201 Jun-02 Harper
Woods Lawrence, KS 2,339 375 2,234 NA Hampton Acres Desoto, TX 119 Jul-02 1,404 375 3,638 4,013 NA Southridge Estates Des Moines, IA 302 Jul-02
1,015 Mar-00 Havenwood Pompano Beach, FL 3,170 443 2,535 367 443 2,902 NA Pleasant Grove Raleigh, NC 72 Jul-02 NA Amber Village Dallas, TX 206 Jul-02 NA Village East
3,345 362 May-01 Terrell, TX 196 Hidden
Acres Arnold, MO 437 60 342 143 60 485 545 97 May-00 Hidden
Hills Casper, WY 1,277 221 1,973 503 221 Jul-02 NA Americana #1 & #2 Hemet, CA 309 Sep-02 NA Connelly Village Connelly, NY 100 Sep-02 NA Cypress Shores Winter Haven, FL 204 Sep-02 NA Grand Meadows Longmont, CO 104 Dec-02 NA Berryhill Commons Charlotte, NC 257 Dec-02 NA Berryhill Acres Charlotte, NC 244 Dec-02 NA Creekside Terrace Charlotte, NC 250 Feb-03 NA Brookshire Village St. Louis, MO 202 2,476 2,697 354 Sep-97 Hidden
Oaks Sep-03 NA Philbin Estates Pocatello, ID 180 Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates I Lebanon, TN 270 Feb-04 NA
Fort Worth, TX 637 157 890 1,389 157 2,279 2,436 538 Jul-99 Hideaway Honey Brook, PA Weatherly Estates II Clarksville, TN
108 643 5 108 647 756 131 Feb-04 HTA 100 Oaks Fultondale, AL 235 Feb-04 HTA Jonesboro 11 Jun-04 Highland Elkhart, IN 3,196 982 75 Feb-04 HTA Bermuda Palms Indio, CA 185 5,168 492
Feb-04 HTA Breazeale Laramie, WY 5,661 6,642 157 Feb-04 Highland
Acres &16.5pt;">
117 Feb-04 HTA Broadmore Goshen, IN 370 Feb-04 Lewisville, TX 4,780 856 4,946 &"2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> HTA Butler Creek Augusta, GA 376 Feb-04 HTA Camden Point Kingsland, GA 268 Feb-04 HTA Carnes Crossing Summerville, SC 604 Feb-04 HTA
666 856 5,612 6,468 570 Castlewood Estates Mableton, GA 334 Feb-04 HTA Casual Estates Liverpool, NY 961 Feb-04 HTA
Nov-98 Highview Gillette, WY Riverdale Riverdale, GA 481 Feb-04 HTA Columbia Heights Grand Forks, ND 302 Feb-04 1,568 373 HTA Conway Plantation Conway, SC 1,882 322 373
2,204 2,577 232 Jan-96 Huguenot
Estates Port Jervis, NY 1,956 285 1,789 41 285 1,830 2,115 30 Jun-04 Hunter Ridge Jonesboro, GA 16,000 3,944 23,062 3,114 3,944 26,176 30,120 730 299 Feb-04 HTA Crestview Stillwater, OK 238 Feb-04 HTA Country Village Jacksonville, FL 643 Feb-04 Feb-04 F-63 Indian
Rocks Largo, FL 338 2,029 598 338 2,626 2,964 79 idth:34.25pt;">
HTA Eagle Creek Tyler, TX 194 Feb-04 Feb-04 Inspiration
Valley Arvada, CO 4,446 589 3,337 1,333 HTA Eagle Point Marysville, WA 230 Feb-04 589 4,670 5,259 1,168 Nov-98 Jonesboro
(Atlanta Meadows) Jonesboro, GA 1,555 329 1,917 20 329 Falcon Farms Port Byron, IL 215 Feb-04 HTA Forest Creek Elkhart, IN 167 Feb-04 HTA Fountainvue Lafontaine, IN
1,937 2,265 55 Feb-04 120 Feb-04 HTA Foxhall Village Raleigh, NC 315 Feb-04 HTA Golden Valley Douglasville, GA 131 Feb-04 HTA Huron Estates Chebo0pt;width:5.15pt;">
Kimberly @
Creekside Seagoville, TX 1,267 325 1,939 441 325 2,380 2,705 215 111 F-19 Feb-04 HTA Indian Rocks Largo, FL 148 Feb-04 HTA Knoll Terrace Corvallis, OR 212 Feb-04 HTA La Quinta Ridge Indio, CA 151 Feb-04 HTA
Apr-97 Kintner
Estates Vestal, NY 74 447 53 74 500 574 6 Jun-04 Lakewood Montgomery, AL 396 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Estates Davenport, IA West Valley City, UT 275 180 Feb-04 HTA Landmark Village Fairburn, GA 1,574 289 275 1,863 2,138 524 Feb-04 HTA Marnelle Fayetteville, GA 205 Feb-04 HTA 26 Jun-04 La Quinta
Ridge Indio, CA
Oak Ridge Elkhart, IN 204 Feb-04 736 Oakwood Forest Greensboro, NC 482 Feb-04 HTA Pedalers Pond Lake Wales, FL 214 Feb-04 HTA Pinecrest Village Shreveport, LA 446 Feb-04 4,348 174 736 4,522 5,258 121 Feb-04 LakesideGA Lithia Springs, GA 1,250 170 1,028 149 170 1,177 1,347 33 Feb-04
HTA Pleasant Ridge Mount Pleasant, MI 305 Feb-04 HTA Presidents Park Grand Forks, ND 174 Feb-04 LakesideIA Davenport, IA HTA Riverview Clackamas, OR 133 Feb-04 HTA Saddlebrook N. Charleston, SC 425 Feb-04 HTA Sherwood Hartford City, IN 134 Feb-04 HTA Southwind Village Naples, FL 337 Feb-04 318 1,968 309 318 2,277 2,595 63 Feb-04 Lakeside
of the Palm
HTA Springfield Farms Brookline Sta, MO 290 Feb-04 HTA Stonegate Shreveport, LA 157 Feb-04 HTA Terrace Heights Dubuque, IA 317 West Palm Beach, FL 4,136 1,262 8,653 324 1,262 8,977 10,239 1,162 Sep-98 Lakeview
Estates Layton, UT 5,099 963 5,342 HTA Torrey Hills Flint, MI 377 Feb-04 HTA Twin Pines Goshen, IN 238 Feb-04 HTA Villa Flint, MI 319 Feb-04 HTA Winter Haven Oaks Winterhaven, FL 343 Feb-04 HTA Green Park South Pelham, AL 421 Feb-04 HTA Hunter Ridge Jonesboro, GA 838 Feb-04 HTA Friendly Village Lawrenceville, GA 203 963 6,408 7,371 Feb-04 HTA Misty Winds Corpus Christi, TX 354 759 Oct-01 LakewoodTX Royse City, TX
Feb-04 HTA Shadow Hills Orlando, FL 670 Feb-04 HTA Smoke Creek Snellville, GA 264 2,250 640 5,683 1,015 640 6,698 7,338 895 Oct-00 Lakewood
Estates Davenport, IA 3,011 621 3,885 Feb-04 HTA Woodlands of Kennesaw Kennesaw, GA 273 Feb-04 HTA Sunset Vista Magna, UT 207 Feb-04 HTA Sea Pines Mobile, AL 429 Feb-04 HTA Woodland Hills Montgomery, AL 628 459 621 4,344 Feb-04 HTA The Pines Ladson, SC 204
4,965 124 Feb-04 Feb-04 HTA Shady Hills Nashville, TN 251 Feb-04 HTA Lamplighter
Village Marietta, GA 9,506 2,635 15,668 Trailmont Goodlettsville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA 1,367 2,635 17,035 19,670 486 Mar-04 Landmark
Village Fairburn, GA Chisholm Creek Wichita, KS 254 Feb-04 HTA Big Country Cheyenne, WY 251 Feb-04 HTA Heritage Point Montgomery, AL 264 9,600 2,048 11,320 2,289 2,048 13,609 15,657 360 Feb-04 Lido
Estates Lancaster, CA 2,537 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Lithia Springs, GA 103 Feb-04 HTA Plantation Estates Douglasville, GA 138 Feb-04 HTA
398 2,257 Green Acres Petersburg, VA 182 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Davenport, IA 124 Feb-04 HTA Evergreen Village Pleasant View, UT 238 Feb-04 HTA 1,810 398 4,067 4,465 738 May-01 Loveland Loveland, CO 1,949 661 3,038 260 661
Four Seasons Fayetteville, GA 214 Feb-04 HTA 3,298 3,959 306 Apr-95 Alafia Riverfront Riverview, FL 96 Feb-04 HTA
Magnolia
Circle Jacksonville, FL Highland Elkhart, IN 246 Feb-04 HTA Birchwood Farms Birch Run, MI 143 F-20 Feb-04 HTA Cedar Terrace Cedar Rapids, IA 255 Feb-04 HTA Five Seasons Davenport Davenport, IA 270 Feb-04 HTA Silver Creek Davenport, IA 280 Feb-04 HTA Encantada<7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">
123 706 1,957 123 2,663 2,786 594 May-99 Mallard
Lake Pontoon Beach, IL 5,138 1,177 6,695 (267 Las Cruces, NM 354 Feb-04 HTA Royal Crest Los Alamos, NM 180 Feb-04 HTA Brookside Village ) 1,177 6,428 7,605 169 Apr-04 Maple
Manor Taylor, PA 3,704 862 5,195 Dallas, TX 394 Feb-04 HTA Meadow Glen Keller, TX 409 Feb-04 HTA Silver Leaf Mansfield, TX 145
208 862 5,403 6,266 88 Jun-04 Marion
Village Marion, IA Mar-04 HTA Lamplighter Village Marietta, GA 431 7,657 1,605 8,140 15 654
Mar-04 HTA Shadowood Acworth, GA 506 8,794 10,415 249 Mar-04 Marnelle Fayetteville, GA 4,152 917 5,364 819 917
Mar-04 HTA Stone Mountain Stone Mountain, GA 354 Mar-04 HTA Marion Village Marion, IA 486 Mar-04 HTA Autumn Forest Brown Summit, NC 299 Mar-04 HTA Woodlake Greensboro, NC 6,183 7,100 169 Feb-04 MartinS Nottingham, PA 225 1,318 47 225 1,365 1,590 22 308 Mar-04 HTA Arlington Lakeside Arlington, TX 233 Apr-04 HTA Pine Ridge Sarasota, FL 126 Apr-04 HTA Cedar Knoll Waterloo, IA 290 Apr-04 HTA Mallard Lake Pontoon Beach, IL 278 Jun-04 NA Kopper View West Valley City, UT Jun-04 Meadow
Glen Keller, TX 1,417 8,363 926 1,417 9,289 10,706 522 Feb-04 Meadowbrook Pueblo, CO 3,866 61 Jun-04 NA Overpass Point Tooele, UT
942 8,433 182 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pleasant View Berwick, PA ) 942 8,405 9,347 1,157 Apr-95 Meadowood Topeka, KS 3,212 762 108 Jun-04 4,628 542 762 5,170 5,932 527 D.A.M. Brookside Berwick, PA 171 Jun-04 D.A.M. Beaver Run Linkwood, MD 118 Jun-04 D.A.M. Carsons Chambersburg, PA 130 Jun-04 Oct-00 Meridian
Sooner Chelsea Sayre, PA 85 Jun-04 D.A.M. Collingwood Horseheads, NY 101 Jun-04
Oklahoma City, OK 1,615 262 1,492 1,988 262 3,480 D.A.M. Crestview Sayre, PA 98 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Danboro Danboro, PA 231 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Ephrata Ephrata, PA 149 Jun-04 D.A.M. Frieden Schuylkill Haven, PA 3,742 768 Aug-00 Meridian
Terrace San Bernardino, CA 4,592 1,012 5,747 1,868 1,012 7,615 8,627
192 Jun-04tyle="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;"> 1,148 May-01 Merrimac
Manor Huntsville, AL 147 3,252 289 147 3,541 3,688 757 May-99 Mesquite
Green Dallas, TX 1,759 352 1,697
D.A.M. Green Acres Chambersburg, PA 24 Jun-04 D.A.M. Gregory Courts Honey Brook, PA 39 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Honey Brook 550 352 2,247 2,599 218 Jan-98 Mesquite
Meadows Dallas, TX 3,212 443 146
2,819 1,262 443 4,081 4,524 403 Jun-04 D.A.M. Huguenot Port Jervis, NY 166 Mesquite
Ridge Dallas, TX 2,282
Jun-04 D.A.M. Maple Manor Taylor, PA 316 387 2,013 941 387 2,954 Jun-04 D.A.M. Monroe Valley Jonestown, PA 44 Jun-04 D.A.M. Moosic Heights Avoca, PA 152 Jun-04 D.A.M. Mountaintop Narvon, PA 39 "Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 3,341 248 Dec-97 Mission
Estates El Paso, TX 2,841 795 4,549 1,414 795 5,963 6,758 828 Aug-01 Misty
Hollow Midwest City, OK 279 97 883 46 97 929 1,026 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Haven Blossvale, NY 130 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunny Acres Somerset, PA 207 Jun-04 D.A.M. Suburban 139 Sep-98 Misty
Winds Corpus Christi, TX 5,170 812 4,845 259 Greenburg, PA 202 Jun-04 D.A.M. Blue Ridge Conklin, NY 69 Jun-04 D.A.M. Chambersburg I&II Chambersburg, PA 100 Jun-04 D.A.M. Hideaway Honey Brook, PA 40 Jun-04 D.A.M. Kintner Vestal, NY 55 Jun-04 D.A.M. Martins Nottingham, PA 60 Jun-04 D.A.M. Nichols Phoenixville, PA 10 Jun-04 D.A.M. 812 5,104 5,916 161 Feb-04 Mobile
Gardens Denver, CO 3,806 Scenic View East Earl, PA 18 440 2,497 879 440 3,376 3,816 854 Nov-98 Monroe
Valley Jonestown, PA 271 120 717 3 120 720 840 Jun-04 D.A.M. Shady Grove Atglen, PA 40
12 F-21 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Blandon Fleetwood, PA 30 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Morgantown Morgantown, PA 23 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Tuckerton Reading, PA 74 Jun-04 D.A.M. Valley View in Wernersville Wernersville, PA 29 Jun-04 D.A.M. Pine Terrace Schuylkill Haven, PA 25 Jun-04 D.A.M. Sunnyside Trooper, PA 71 Jun-04 D.A.M. Oakwood Lake Village Tunkhannock, PA 79 Jun-04 Moosic
Heights Avoca, PA 1,864 389 2,354 112
Jul-04 NA Western Mobile Estates West Valley City, UT 145 389 2,466 2,854 39 Jun-04 Mountainside
Estates Golden, CO 7,932 1,120 6,351 1,631 1,120 7,982 9,102 1,985 Nov-98 Mountaintop Narvon, PA Sep-04 NA Willow Creek Estates Ogden, UT 137 387 141 As of December 31, 2004, the
Company has a total of 43.3 million Common OP Units, 5.0 million
Series A Preferred OP Units, 300,000 Series B Preferred Units and
706,000 Series C Preferred OP Units outstanding. The following table
summarizes our partner capital transactions from inception of the Company (in
thousands): Year Common Series A
851 36 141 887 1,028 15 Jun-04 Mulberry
Heights Fort Worth, TX 105 625 Series B Series C Series D Total Initial capitalization 1,102 105 1,727 1998 1,038 $ 20,000 Sales of OP Units
1,832 362 Oct-99 Navajo
Lake Estates Wichita, KS 2,097 468 3,018 1999 4,155 295 468 78,804 Sales of OP Units 2000 2,995 3,313 3,781 394 Jul-97 New Twin Lakes Middletown, NY 6,458 898
63,859 Sales of OP Units 2001 1,497 4,913 1,203 898 6,116 7,014
840 Jul-01 F-64 33,700 Sales of OP Units Nichols Phoenixville, PA 36 214 36 214 250 4 Jun-04 Northern
Hills Springdale, AR 2,294 520 3,294 180 520 3,474 3,994 379 Nov-97 Northland Kansas City, MO 5,239 720 4,077 1,045 720 5,122 1,498 33,760 OP Units issued in Reorganization 2002 8,516 5,842 1,131 Sep-99 Oak Glen Fayetteville, AR 1,122 241 1,474 62 241 1,536 1,777 189 Nov-97 Oak Grove Godfrey, IL 660 129 759
670 129 1,429 1,558 384
202,472 Subtotal 19,699 Sep-99 Oak Park
Village (FL) Gainesville, FL 4,479 406 1,358 1,128 432,595 Issuance of Common OP Units in connection with ARC IPO 2004 23,572 410,724 Restricted common units issued, net of current year
amortization 2004 95
406 2,486 2,892 487 Jun-98 Oak Park
Village (TX) Coppell, TX 2,563 971 4,383 357 971 4,740 5,711 234 Apr-97 199 Forfeiture of restricted common OP units Oak Ridge Elkhart, IN 4,100 815 4,656 424
2004 (80 ) 815 5,080 5,896 148 Feb-04 Oakridge /
Stonegate Stillwater, OK 833 333 1,828 (150 ) Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with ARC IPO
191 2004 5,000 119,108 333 2,019 2,352 272 Mar-98
Issuance of Preferred OP Units in connection with D.A.M.
portfolio acquisition 2004 Oakwood
Forest Greensboro, NC 6,100 1,609 8,697 300 706 320 33,142 Redemption of Preferred OP Units 2004 725 1,609 9,421 11,031 (320 ) (8,000 ) Redemption of Common OP Units 2004 261 Feb-04 Oakwood
Lake Village Tunkhannock, PA
(8 ) 605 181 1,090 128 181 1,219 1,400 18 Jun-04 Oasis Pueblo, CO 3,817
(125 ) Common OP Unit distributions 2004 907 5,142 929 907 6,071 6,978 (47,085 ) Subtotal Nov-98 Ortega
Village Jacksonville, FL 3,023 486 43,278
2,416 5,000 300 "10" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.7pt;">
3,198 486 5,614 6,100 1,423 Jun-99 Overholser
Village Oklahoma City, OK 1,233 706 940,408 Accumulated
other comprehensive income &nbst 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
446 2,779 119 446 2,898 3,344 390 Jan-98 Overpass
Point MHC Tooele, UT 544 3,629 472 544 4,100 4,644 &np; 1,208 Cumulative net losses
66 Jun-04 Park
Avenue Estates Haysville, KS 401 180 1,021 1,032 180 2,053 2,233 533 Feb-00 Park
DAntoine Wilton, NY 330 (225,677 ) Partners capital, December 31, 2004 $ 715,939 F-22 58 332 33 On January 23,
2004 our partners approved a reverse split by which all of our partners
received 0.519 Common OP Unit for every Common OP Unit they previously owned.
As a result, we have restated all historical Common OP Unit data to give effect
to this reverse split. On February 18,
2004, ARC completed its IPO of 22.3 million shares of common stock at
$19.00 per share (excluding 2.3 million shares sold by selling
stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of preferred stock priced at $25.00
per share. The proceeds to ARC from the IPO of common stock and preferred stock
were $517.5 million, net of underwriting discount and before expenses. On March 17,
2004, ARC issued an additional 791,592 shares of common stock pursuant to the
underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option generating net proceeds
to ARC. The proceeds received by ARC in connection with its IPO were
contributed to the Operating Partnership, and the Company issued
23.1 million Common OP Units and 5.0 million Series A Preferred
OP Units to ARC. Also in
connection with ARCs IPO, we granted 530,000 Common OP Units that vested at
the date of grant. We valued the units at $19.00 per unit, the price at which
ARC sold shares in the IPO. In addition, we granted 95,000 restricted Common OP
Units. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted Common OP Units were
forfeited. In October 2004, an additional 37,500 restricted Common OP
Units were forfeited. In
addition, as of December 31, 2004 ARC has outstanding warrants to certain
ARC shareholders authorizing the purchase of up to 775,000 shares of ARC common
stock at $18.85 per share, as adjusted for dividends paid by ARC. The warrants
expire on July 23, 2010 and, if exercised, would result in issuance of 775,000
additional Common OP Units. To date, no warrants have been exercised. We repurchased a total of 8,025 Common OP Units from Common
OP Unitholders for total cash of approximately $125,000 during 2004. No
repurchases were completed in 2003 or 2002. At the ARC IPO, the Company issued 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP Units at a price of $25.00 per unit that have a liquidation
preference of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid
distributions. The holders of our Series A Preferred OP Units are
entitled to receive cash distributions at a rate of 8.25% per annum of the
$25.00 liquidation preference. The Series A Preferred OP Units have no
voting rights and no stated maturity. We may not redeem the Series A
Preferred OP Units prior to February 18, 2009. On and after February 18,
2009, we may, at our option, redeem our Series A Preferred OP Unith="8" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.15pt;">
58 365 423 40 Feb-02 Park Plaza Gillette, WY 1,507 169 964 441 169 1,405 1,574 Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units At December 31,
2004, we had 300,000 Series B Preferred OP Units and 705,688 Series C
Preferred OP Units outstanding that were issued as part of the D.A.M. portfolio
acquisition (see Note 3). Each Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Unit is redeemable for cash, or at our election, one share of ARC
common stock (which would necessitate the issuance of one Common OP Unit). The Series B
OP Units carry a liquidation preference of $25 per unit and earn cash
distributions at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The Series B
OP Units can be redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance
at the option of the Operating Partnership. Series B OP Unitholders can
request redemption of their units after the 1st anniversary of
issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series B
OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or cash and a note payable,
at the Operating Partnerships option. As of December 31, 2004, we have
accrued F-23 $78,125 of the Series B OP Unit preferred distribution,
representing the portion of the preferred distribution earned by Series B
Preferred Unitholders through that date. The Series C Preferred OP Units carry a liquidation
preference of $25 per unit and earn cash distributions at the rate of 6.25% per
annum, payable quarterly. The Series C Preferred OP Units can be
redeemed for cash after the fifth anniversary of the issuance at the option of
the Operating Partnership. Series C Preferred OP Unitholders can request
redemption of their units after the two and a half year anniversary of
issuance, at which time the Operating Partnership must redeem the Series C
Preferred OP Units or repurchase them with ARC common stock or with cash and a
note payable, at the Operating Partnerships option. Series B and C
Preferred OP Units have the same priority as to the payment of distributions.
As of December 31, 2004, we had accrued $183,773 of the Series C
Preferred OP Unit preferred distribution, representing the portion of the
preferred distribution earned by Series C Preferred OP Unitholders
through that date. On March 10,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1493 per Common OP Unit,
prorated from February 18, 2004 to March 31, 2004. We paid the total
Common OP Unit distribution of $6.5 million on April 15, 2004 to
unitholders of record on March 31, 2004. In addition, on March 10,
2004 we declared a distribution of $0.4182 on each unit of our Series A
Preferred OP Unit, prorated from February 18, 2004 to April 30, 2004.
We paid the Series A Preferred OP Units distribution of
$2.1 million on April 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on April 15,
2004. On June 14,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Units. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.6 million on July 15,
2004 to unitholders of record on June 30, 2004. In addition, on June 14,
2004 we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each Series A Preferred OP
Unit. This distribution was paid July 30, 2004 to unitholders of record on
July 15, 2004. In addition, on July 30, 2004 we paid a $0.13 per unit
distribution, prorated from July 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004, on both
the Series B and Series C Preferred OP Units. On September 14,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on October 15,
2004 to unitholders of record on September 30, 2004. Also, on September 14,
2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series A
Preferred OP Unit. This distribution was paid October 29, 2004 to
unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. In addition, on September 14,
2004 we declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on October 29, 2004 to
unitholders of record on October 15, 2004. On December 10,
2004, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We
paid the total Common OP Unit distribution of $13.5 million on January 14,
2005 to unitholders of record on December 31, 2004. Also, on December 10,
2004, we declared a distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series A
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid January 31, 2005 to
unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004,
we had accrued $1.7 million of the Series A Preferred OP Unit
distribution, representing the portion of the distribution earned by preferred
shareholders through that date. In addition, on December 10, 2004 we
declared a $0.39 per unit distribution on both the Series B and Series C
Preferred OP Units. This distribution was paid on January 31, 2005 to
unitholders of record on January 15, 2005. On March 10, 2005, we declared a quarterly
distribution of $0.3125 per Common OP Unit. We will pay the total Common OP
Unit distribution of $13.5 million on April 15, 2005 to unitholders
of record on March 31, 2005. Also, on March 10, 2005, we declared a
distribution of $0.5156 on each of our Series A Preferred OP Units. This
distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on April 15,
2005. In addition, on March 10, 2005 we declared a $0.39 per unit
distribution on both the Series B and F-24 Series C Preferred OP Units.
This distribution is payable on April 29, 2005 to unitholders of record on
April 15, 2005. 5. Rental
and Other Property, net The following summarizes rental and
other property (in thousands): December 31, 2004 194 Apr-01 Parkview Estates San Jacinto, CA 2,400 600 3,419 2,859 600 6,278 6,878 951 May-01 Pedalers
Pond Lake Wales, FL 2,617 581 3,253 2003 Land $ 211,383 $ 119,779 Land improvements and buildings 1,268,002 705,573 Rental homes and improvements 197,668 129,194 Furniture, equipment and vehicles 12,434 8,656 Subtotal 1,689,487 963,202 Less
accumulated depreciation 1,470 581 4,723 5,304 144 Feb-04 Philbin
Estates Pocatello, ID 306
(156,707 ) (99,687 ) Rental and other property, net $ 1,532,780 $ 863,515 Land improvements and buildings comprise primarily
infrastructure, roads and common area amenities. The following table sets forth
certain information regarding our debt (in thousands). December 31, 418 306 2,197 2,503 lign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:345.2pt;">
2004 2003 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2012, 7.35% per annum $ 303,903 $ 306,767 Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2014, 5.53% per annum 213,333 92 Sep-03 Picture
Ranch Clifton, CO 1,633 479 2,613
Senior fixed rate mortgage due 2009, 5.05% per annum 99,651 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2006, LIBOR plus 3.0%
per annum (5.40% at December 31, 2004) 150,871 Senior variable rate mortgage due 2005, LIBOR plus 2.85%
per annum (3.97% at December 31, 2003) 100 479 2,713 3,192 248 174,756 BFND credit facility due 2005, LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum
(4.12% at December 31, 2003) 52,414 Various individual fixed rate mortgages due 2005 through
2031, averaging 7.31% per annum Jun-00 Pine Haven
MHP Blossvale, NY 944
153,818 40,380 Preferred interest due 2005, 14.0% per annum 170,000 Rental home credit facility due 2010, LIBOR plus 4.7% per
annum (5.82% at December 31, 2003) 24,055 Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility, LIBOR plus 2.95%
(5.35% at December 31, 2004) 51,000 Floorplan lines of credit, ranging from prime plus 0.75%
to the prime rate plus 4.00% (averaging 7.79% at December 31, 2004) 27,999 137 864 (6 ) 137 858 Other loans due 2005 1,047
995 15 Jun-04 Pine Hills Lawrence, KS 1,125 $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 The fair value of debt outstanding as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 was approximately $1,028.6 million and $813.0 million,
respectively. F-25 Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 on
May 2, 2002. It is an obligation of certain of our special purpose real
property subsidiaries and is collateralized by 105 manufactured home
communities. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 bears interest at a fixed
rate of 7.35% per annum, will amortize based on a 30-year schedule and
matures on May 1, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage agreement,
we have established reserves relating to the mortgaged properties for real
estate taxes, insurance, capital spending (included in loan reserves) and
property operating expenditures (included in cash and cash equivalents). The
Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2012 contains customary defeasance-based
prepayment penalties for repayments made prior to maturity. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2014 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014 on
February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the
Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 46 manufactured home
communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due
2014 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.53% per annum, will amortize based on
a 30-year schedule and will mature on March 1, 2014. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the
mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and
property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2014
contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made
prior to maturity. Senior
Fixed Rate Mortgage Due 2009 We entered into the Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009 on
February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the
Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property subsidiaries
of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 29 manufactured home
communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due
2009 bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.05%, will amortize based on a 30-year
amortization schedule and will mature on March 1, 2009. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage agreement, we have established reserves relating to the
mortgaged properties for real estate taxes, insurance, capital spending and
property operating expenditures. The Senior Fixed Rate Mortgage due 2009
contains customary defeasance-based prepayment penalties for repayments made
prior to maturity. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2006 We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006
on February 18, 2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and
the Hometown acquisition. It is an obligation of certain real property
subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and is collateralized by 44
manufactured home communities owned by these subsidiaries. The Senior Variable
Rate Mortgage due="font-size:1.0pt;"> 1,303 204 1,641 94 204 1,735 1,939 247 Jan-98 Pine
Terrace Schuylkill Haven, PA 50 296 79 50 374 424 5 Jun-04 Pinecrest
Village Shreveport, LA 3,264 689 3,558 663 689 4,221 4,910 134 Feb-04 Plainview Casper, WY 713 86 484 F-26 and property operating
expenditures. We may repay the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2006 subject
to a prepayment penalty calculated as the product of 0.25%, the number of
payment dates remaining to maturity and the amount being repaid for prepayments
made in months one through twelve. Prepayments made in months 13 to 24 are
subject to a flat 1% fee of amounts repaid. Senior Variable Rate Mortgage Due
2005 We entered into the Senior Variable Rate Mortgage due 2005
on May 2, 2002. It was an obligation of one of our subsidiaries and was
collateralized by 71 manufactured home communities. The floating rate debt bore
interest at a variable rate calman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 1,233 86 1,717 1,803 399 Nov-00 Plantation
Estates We entered into a $150 million credit facility on November 14,
2000, (the BFND Credit Facility). Proceeds from the BFND Credit Facility were
available for community acquisitions and anticipated capital expenditures with
advances up to 70% of the purchase price and related costs. On February 18,
2004, concurrent with ARCs IPO, we repaid the BFND Credit Facility in full and
incurred $786,000 in debt extinguishment costs, which are included as early
termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004. Various Individual Fixed Rate
Mortgages We have assumed various individual fixed rate mortgages in
connection with the acquisition of various properties that were encumbered at
the time of acquisition as follows: a) Mortgages assumed as part of
individual property purchases. These notes total approximately
$46.3 million at December 31, 2004, mature from 2006 through 2028 and
have an average effective interest rate of 7.56%. These mortgages are secured
by 14 specific manufactured home communities. b) Mortgages assumed in
conjunction with the Hometown acquisition. These notes total approximately
$78.2 million, mature from 2005 through 2031 and carry an average
effective interest rate of 5.12%. These mortgages are secured by 20 specific
manufactured home communities and are subject to early pre-payment penalties,
the terms of which vary from mortgage to mortgage. c) Notes assumed in conjunction
with the D.A.M. portfolio purchase. These notes total approximately
$29.3 million, mature in 2008 and carry an average effective annual
interest rate of 7.18%. These mortgages are secured by 22 specific manufactured
home communities. We entered into the Preferred Interest on May 2, 2002.
The Preferred Interest had a preferred distribution rate of 12.5% per annum. On
October 17, 2003, we modified our Preferred Interest to increase our
borrowing limit by $25.0 million with a preferred distribution rate of
14.0% to apply to all outstanding balances beginning on the date of the first
draw of the additional loan amount. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with
ARCs IPO, we repaid the Preferred Interest obligation in full and incurred
$3.4 million in extinguishment costs, which are included as early
termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2004. F-27 On December 31, 2002, ARC Housing, L.L.C., a
subsidiary of ARC RE, entered into a $27.0 million credit facility
collateralized by rental homes (the Rental Home Credit Facility). Proceeds
from the Rental Home Credit Facility were available for acquisitions of rental
homes and related capital expenditures. The Rental Home Credit Facility would
have matured on February 1, 2010, bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus
4.7% (5.82% at December 31, 2003), required level monthly principal and
interest payments of $421,000 beginning February 1, 2003, and was secured
by 3,339 rental homes. We fully funded the Rental Home Credit Facility on January 3,
2003. On February 18, 2004, concurrent with ARCs IPO, we repaid the
Rental Home Credit Facility in full and incurred $235,000 in debt
extinguishment costs, which are included as early termination of debt in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004. Senior
Revolving Credit Facility We entered
into the Senior Revolving Credit Facility on February 18, 2004, in
connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown acquisition. The
Senior Revolving Credit Facility had a total commitment of $125.0 million,
and an initial term of three years. The facility was an obligation of our
Operating Partnership and was secured by 40 communities owned by a real
property subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, our rental homes, and certain
other assets. In August 2004, we cancelled the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility and incurred $3.3 million in debt extinguishment costs, which are
included as early termination of debt in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. In September 2004, we obtained a Revolving Credit
Mortgage Facility for borrowings of up to $85.0 million. This facility is
an obligation of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership and is secured by
the same 40 communities that previously secured the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility, as well as various additional communities acquired subsequent to ARCs
IPO. Advances under the Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility are limited by
borrowing base requirements related to the value and cash flow of the
communities securing the loan. The Revolving Credit Mortgage Facility bears
interest at the one month LIBOR plus 2.95% (5.35% at December 31, 2004)
and has a term of one year. We incurred a commitment fee of 0.5% at the closing
of the facility and will pay origination fees of 0.5% with each advance. The
facility contains no significant financial covenants. We entered
into the Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility on February 18,
2004, in connection with the completion of ARCs IPO and the Hometown
acquisition. The Retail Home Sales and Consumer Finance Debt Facility has a
total commitment of $225.0 million and a term of four years. This facility
is an obligation of various subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, and
borrowings under this facility are secured by manufactured housing sales
contracts. Borrowings under the facility are limited by specified borrowing
base requirements related to the value of the collateral securing the facility.
The facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon a spread of 3.00%
over the one-month LIBOR. There were no borrowings outstanding under this
facility as of December 31, 2004. This facility includes customary
affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum GAAP tangible net worth
and maximum leverage covenants. We are in compliance with all financial
covenants of the debt facility as of December 31, 2004. Upon the initial
drawing under this facility, we will pay a commitment fee of 1.00% on the
committed amount and additional annual commitment fees payable on each
anniversary of the closing. Advances under the facility will be subject to a
number of conditions, including certain underwriting and credit screening
guidelines and the conditions that the home must be located in one of our
communities, the loan term may not exceed 12 years for a single-section
home or 15 years for a multi-section home and the loan amount shall not
exceed 90% of the value of the home securing the sales contract. F-28 The availability of advances under the retail home sales
and consumer finance debt facility is subject to certain conditions that are
beyond our control. Conditions that could result in our inability to draw on
these facilities include a downgrade in the credit rating of the lender and the
absence of certain markets for financing debt obligations secured by securities
or mortgage loans. Funding under this facility may also be denied if the lender
determines that the value of the assets serving as collateral would be
insufficient to maintain the required 75% loan-to-value ratio upon giving
effect to a request for funding. The lender can also at any time require that
we prepay amounts funded or provide additional collateral if in its judgment
this is necessary to maintain the 75% loan-to-value ratio (see Note 19). In August 2004, we amended our floorplan lines of
credit to provide borrowings of up to $50.0 million, secured by
manufactured homes in inventory. The amended lines of credit mature in September 2007.
Under the amended lines of credit, the lender will advance 90% of the cost of
manufactured homes for the first $40.0 million in advances, with the
remaining $10.0 million in advances made at 75% of home costs. Repayments
of borrowed amounts are due upon sale or lease of the related manufactured
home. Advances under the amended lines of credit will bear interest ranging
from the prime rate plus 75bp to the prime rate plus 4.00% (5.50% to 8.75% at December 31,
2004), based on the length of time each advance has been outstanding. Monthly
curtailment payments are required for unsold homes beginning 360 days
following the purchase of the home. The required curtailment payment will be
between 3.00% and 5.00% of the homes original invoice amount depending on the
type of home and the number of months since the homes purchase. The amended
lines of credit require the Operating Partnership to maintain a minimum
tangible net worth of $500.0 million, a maximum debt to tangible net worth
ratio of 3 to 1, and minimum cash and cash equivalents of $15.0 million.
We are in compliance with all financial covenants of the lines of credit as of December 31,
2004. The lines of credit are subject to a commitment fee of $250,000, an
unused line fee of .25% per annum and a termination fee of 1.00% to 3.00%,
based on the termination date. The aggregate amount of annual
principal maturities for all notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2004
is as follows (in thousands): Fixed Rate Debt 1,508 331 1,851
Variable Rate Debt Total 564 331 2,415 2,747 70
2005 $ 11,957 $ 78,999 $ 90,956 2006 22,487 Feb-04 Pleasant
Grove (CO) Fort Collins, CO 2,667 150,871 173,358 2007 10,790
582 3,237 10,790 2008 61,685 532 582 3,769 4,351 390 Oct-96 Pleasant
Grove (NC) Fuquay-Varina, NC 950 191 1,094 369 191 1,463 1,654 129 Jul-02 Pleasant
View Estates 61,685 2009 113,456 113,456 Thereafter 551,377
Berwick, PA 912 551,377 $ 771,752 $ 229,870 $ 1,001,622 F-29 The following reflects the
calculation of loss per unit on a basic and diluted basis (in thousands, except
per unit information): Years ending December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Loss per unit from continuing
operations: Loss from
continuing operations $ (84,913 ) $ (43,267 ) $ (48,109 ) Preferred
unit distributions (9,752 ) Net loss
from continuing operations $ (94,665 ) $ (43,267 ) $ (48,109 ) Loss per
unit from continuing operations $ (2.34 ) $ 231 1,361 80 231 1,441 1,672 23 Jun-04 Portside Jacksonville, FL 18,395 5,487 30,607 1,012 5,487
(2.20 ) $ (2.94 ) Income
(loss) per unit from discontinued operations: Income
from discontinued operations $ 1,915 $ 31 $ 1,040 Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations (8,549 ) 3,333 Net income
(loss) from discontinued operations $ (6,634 31,619 37,106 3,021 Mar-00 Prairie
Village Salina, KS 1,958 448 2,132 272 448 2,404 2,852 260 Sep-98 Presidents
Park Grand Forks, ND 421 2,437 614 ) $ 3,364 $ 1,040 Income
(loss) per unit from discontinued operations $ (0.17 ) $ 0.17 $ 0.06 Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders: Net loss
to common OP unitholders $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Loss per
unit to common OP unitholders $ (2.51 ) $ (2.03 ) $ (2.88 ) Weighted
average unit information: Total
units outstanding 40,413 19,699 16,353 For the year ended December 31, 2004 we have excluded
0.9 million common units related to PPUs and restricted common units from the
loss per unit calculation as the impact would be anti-dilutive in nature. 8. Property Operations
Expense During the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred property operations
expenses as follows (in thousands): 421 3,051 3,472 84 Feb-04 Quail Run Hutchins, TX 1,600 430 2,164
For the Year Ended 3,051 430 5,215 5,645 681 Jul-01 Rambling
Oaks Huntsville, AL 485 74 911 66 74 977 1,051 178 2004 2003 2002 Utilities and telephone $ 27,128 $ 16,911 $ 13,849 Salaries and benefits 21,224 11,704 8,607 Repairs and maintenance 13,264 6,837 5,615 Insurance 3,870
Jan-98 Redwood
Village Salt Lake City, UT 1,110 158 905 1,679 Bad debt expense 3,745 2,394
145 158 1,464 Advertising 1,099 904 553 Other operating expenses 4,820 3,276 1,050 1,208 $ 75,150 $ 44,295
184 Aug-00 Ridgewood
Estates Topeka, KS 3,868 1,041 5,224 241 1,041 5,465 6,506 609 Jan-97 River Oaks Kansas City, KS 3,398 1,179 7,357 933 1,179 8,290 33,341 F-30 9,469 929 Nov-98 9. Retail Home Sales,
Finance, Insurance and Other Operations Expenses During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred retail home sales, finance, insurance and
other operations expenses as follows (in thousands): Riverchase Manhattan, KS 1,080 403 For the Year Ended 2004 2003 3,070
367 403 3,437 3,840 451 Apr-98 Riverdale Riverdale, UT 5,541 1,027 5,850 2002 Utilities and telephone $ 79 $ 320 $ 308 Salaries and benefits 2,310 887 1,027 6,737 7,764 1,164 Sep-00 Riverdale
(Colonial Riverdale, GA 7,671 1,737 10,252 1,692 1,737 11,943 4,469 4,991 Repairs and maintenance 354 801 13,681 325 Feb-04 Insurance 187 179 257 Bad debt expense 188 95 20 Advertising 3,632 433 509 Other operating expenses 1,448 1,085 2,229 $ 8,198< Riverside
(KS) Lawrence, KS 1,187 268 1,649 36 268 1,685 1,953
$ 7,382 $ 8,582 10. General and
Administrative Expense During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 we incurred general and administrative expenses as follows
(in thousands): For the Year Ended 2004 197
2003 2002 Salaries and benefits(b) $ 21,087 Jan-98 Riverside (UT) West Valley City, UT 4,038 690 $ 9,274 $ 3,900 3,609 690 7,509 8,199 904 May-02 F-65 Rockview
Heights Arnold, MO 1,302 209 1,246 1,498 209 2,744 2,953
Travel 2,140 1,712 1,276 Professional services 2,580 2,205 693 Insurance 1,012 384 788 Rent(a) 379 1,715 444 Management fees(c) 1,007 804 Mar-99 Rolling
Hills Dallas, TX 3,197 382 1,887 897 382 2,784 3,166 Other administrative expenses 2,163 1,565 1,731 $ 29,361 $ 16,855 $ 13,087 (a) Includes
approximately $864,000 of one time expenses related to vacating unused
corporate office space for the year ended December 31, 2003. (b) Includes
approximately $10.1 million of one time expenses related to Common OP Units
issued to employees in connection with ARCS IPO. (c) Represents
fees paid to an affiliate prior to the Reorganization. In September 2003,
we sold our Sunrise Mesa Community located in Apache Junction, Arizona for
$15.0 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million after giving effect
to net assets sold of $11.5 million and closing costs of $121,000. In
connection with the sale, we repaid $10.3 million of our Senior Variable
Rate Mortgage due 2005 related to this community. In July 2004, we entered into a real estate auction
agreement to sell twelve communities, comprising 2,933 homesites,
geographically located where the company does not have market concentration.
The auction was held in September 2004. In addition to the twelve
communities sold, as part of the auction, the company also contracted to sell
two parcels of undeveloped commercial land located adjacent to one of its
communities in Colorado. All of these sales, except one, closed during the
fourth quarter of 2004. The remaining community continues to be held for sale
and classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2004 based on
the companys intent to sell this community during 2005. F-31 In
September 2004, we entered into an agreement to sell our Sea Pines, Camden
Point and Butler Creek communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total
sales price of approximately $5.9 million. These sales also closed during
the fourth quarter of 2004. In
October 2004, we entered into a real estate auction agreement to sell
twelve communities, comprising 2,440 homesites, geographicallye="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 296 Mar-98 Rose
Country Estates In December 2004,
we entered into an agreement to sell our Sunswept, Berryhill Acres and
Berryhill Commons communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales
price of approximately $8.3 million. These sales also closed during the
fourth quarter of 2004. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, each of the communities
sold during 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations as of December 31,
2004 and 2003. We have included $54.1 million and $44.4 million of
net assets related to these communities as assets held for sale in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have also included
$29.5 million and $17.0 million of obligations related to these
communities as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying
balance sheets. In addition, we have recast the operations of each of these
communities as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and
recorded a loss of $8.5 million related to the sale of the discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 in connection with these
sales. The following table summarizes combined balance sheet and income
statement information for the discontinued operations noted above (in
thousands): Tyler, TX 760 163 1,804 261 163 2,065 2,228 319 Jan-97 Royal
Crest Los Alamos, NM 4,741 December 31, 2004 2003 Assets Rental and other property, net $ 52,848
1,069 6,310 $ 43,533 Tenant, notes and other receivables, net 309 158 Lease intangibles and customer relationships, net 593 640 Prepaid expenses and other assets 1,069 6,491 7,560 373 31 $ 54,123
185 Feb-04 Saddlebrook N. Charleston, SC 7,610 1,548 9,044 606 1,548 9,649 11,198 267 Feb-04 Scenic
View 44,362 Liabilities Notes payable and preferred interest $ 28,951 $ 16,179 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 262 312 Tenant deposits and other liabilities 303 484 $ 29,516 $ 16,975 For the Year 2004 2003 2002 Statement of Operations Revenue $ East Earl, PA 73 438 2 13,166 $ 7,278 $ 6,625 Operating expenses 11,251 73 441 514 7
7,247 5,585 Income from discontinued operations $ 1,915 Jun-04 Seamist Corpus Christi, TX 31 $ 1,040 180 1,021 2,321 180
F-32 Retail Home Sales Asset Impairment Expense Prior to
2003, our retail home sales subsidiary was engaged in the retail sale of
manufactured homes to third parties through 19 separate, stand-alone retail
dealership locations in five states. Due to significant changes in the
industry, particularly the shortage of consumer financing to support sales of
manufactured homes, in late 2002 we began redirecting our retail home sales
subsidiarys sales efforts away from a retail dealership presence and into an
in-community presence focused exclusively on sales of homes in our communities.
During March 2003 we ceased operations at one of our stand-alone retail
dealership locations and during June 2003 we sold two of our retail
locations recording minor charges to write down fixed assets to fair value. As of July 1, 2003 we operated the remaining 16
separate, stand-alone dealership retail locations in five states. During the
six months ended December 31, 2003 we substantially completed the
redirection of our retail home sales subsidiarys sales efforts away from a
retail dealership presence by selling twelve of our ret1.0pt;"> 3,342 3,522 792 Mar-00 In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate
long-lived assets based on estimated future undiscounted net cash flows
whenever significant events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the
carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. If that evaluation
indicates that impairment has occurred, a charge is recognized to the extent
the carrying amount exceeds the discounted cash flows or fair value of the
asset, whichever is more readily determinable. At December 31, 2004, we evaluated the carrying amount
of certain real estate assets for potential impairment and determined
write-downs using recent appraisals and capitalization rates to estimate the
long-lived assets undiscounted future cash flows. As a result of these
valuations, we recorded an impairment charge to older vacant mobile homes in
our rental home portfolio and to three mobile home communities of
$3.0 million and $500,000, respectively. Seascape Corpus Christi, TX 2,375 525 3,641 497 525 4,138 4,663 587 Aug-96 Shadow
Hills Orlando, FL 8,266 2,254 13,241 2,803 2,254 16,044 18,298 400 Feb-04 Shadow
Mountain Sherman, TX 1,483 369 2,404 524 369 2,928 3,297 329 13. Goodwill
Impairment As
discussed in Note 2, in connection with our Reorganization, we allocated
goodwill of $12.1 million and $2.3 million to the retail home sales
and finance reporting unit and insurance reporting unit, respectively. At December 31,
2002, we evaluated the goodwill for potential impairment using estimated market
values, capitalization rates and multiples of earnings to value each reporting
unit. As a result of this valuation, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in
the retail home sales business of $12.1 million and in the insurance
business of $1.4 million. The impairment for the retail home sales
business arose as a result of a worsening of conditions since the
Reorganization including adverse operating performance in our retail home sales
business, the retaNew Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">Feb-98 Shadowood F-33 sales business provides a significant portion of the
insurance business revenue. We realized no impairment loss for the year ended December 31,
2003. At December 31, 2004, we evaluated our remaining
goodwill for potential impairment using capitalization rates and multiples of
earnings to value the real estate and insurance reporting units. As a result of
these valuations, we recorded an impairment of goodwill in the insurance
business of $863,000. The impairment for the insurance business was necessary
due to the negative growth projectd>
Acworth, GA 9,074 2,48ions for the business product. 14,996 2,491 2,481 17,487 19,968 471 Mar-04 Shady
Creek Seagoville, TX 1,217 241 1,504 553 241 2,057 2,298 221 May-99 Shady
Grove Atglen, PA 103 615 9 103 624 727 10 Jun-04 Shady
Hills Nashville, TN 433 2,524 96 433 2,621 15. Commitments
and Contingencies We lease office space and various
pieces of office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases
have expiration dates beginning in 2005 through July 2009. Minimum future
lease and sublease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2004
are as follows (in thousands): 2005 $ 748 3,053 72 Feb-04 Shady Lane Commerce City, CO 1,193 2006 101 2007 104 2008 48 157 893
2009 16 Total $ 1,017 In December 2003,
we recorded a one time charge of $864,000 for vacating unused office space. In the
normal course of business, from time to time we are involved in legal actions relating
to the ownership and operations of our properties. In our opinion, the
liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions, will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. In the
normal course of business, from time to time we incur environmental obligations
relating to the ownership and operation of our properties. In our opinion, the
liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such environmental
obligations, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. During August and September 2004, our
manufactured home communities located in the southeastern United States were
impacted by hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Our communities
sustained aggregate estimated damages of approximately $1.6 million
consisting primarily of fallen trees and branches, roof and water damage to
clubhouses and buildings, damage to company-owned manufactured homes, and
debris removal. The company has adequate property and business interruption
insurance coverage. The impact of the hurricanes, net of insurance proceeds, on
the companys 2004 results of operations was $453,000. F-34 16. Related
Party Transactions One of our
subsidiaries provides accounting services to six communities that are
controlled by our Chief Executive Officer under two separate year to year asset
management agreements for which we received $27,000 $29,000 and $28,000 in
compensation in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Also, during 2004, 2003 and
2002 we billed these same companies controlled by our Chief Executive Officer
$105,000, $67,000 and $30,000 for property management expenses in accordance
with those agreements. In addition, we lease an airplane hangar from a company
controlled by our Chief Executive Officer for which we paid $53,000, $53,000
and $52,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and
2003, companies owned by our Chief Executive Officer owed to us approximately
$68,000 and $4,000, respectively. During
2002, we purchased ten mobile homes on behalf of one of these affiliates in its
rental unit acquisition operations. As a result, at December 31, 2002 the
affiliate owed $206,000 related to these purchases. During
2002, an officer borrowed $100,000 from a subsidiary in exchange for a note.
an" style="font-size:7.5pt;">286 157 1,179 1,336 274 Mar-99 Prior to
the Reorganization, a subsidiary of the company reimbursed certain related
parties for specific and allocated expenses of $2.7 million during 2002.
These expenses included salaries and benefits, rent and travel and are included
in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The related party
calculated the allocated costs monthly based on the proportion of the
subsidiarys total assets to the total assets under the related partys
control. Prior to the Reorganization, a subsidiary purchased
manufactured homes from a related party amounting to $1.5 million in 2002.
The homes were purchased at a price that approximated the related partys cost
and included them in manufactured homes and improvements.
Shawnee
Hills Topeka, KS 120 712 17. Quarterly Financial
Information (Unaudited) Quarter ended Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31 For the quarters ended 2004: 1,749 120 2,461 2,581 Total
revenue $ 591 Aug-00 Sheridan Arvada, CO 3,369 465 2,639 905 465 3,544 4,009 816 Nov-98 Sherwood
Acres Wichita, KS 414
42,981 $ 55,106 $ 60,088 $ 64,482 Total
expenses $ 80,539 $ 60,898 $ 73,995 $ 93,754 Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (38,032 ) $ (7,547 ) $ (18,227 ) $ (37,493 ) Loss per
unit(a) $ (1.20 ) $ (0.17 ) $ (0.42 ) $ (0.87 ) For the quarters ended 2003: Total
revenue 2,688 240 414 2,928 3,342 363 Jan-00 Shiloh
Pines Tyler, TX 3,800 738 $ 41,390 $ 42,572 $ 41,747 $ 37,486 Total
expenses $ 51,704 $ 52,663 $ 53,316 4,616 1,097 738 $ 50,218 Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (9,741 ) $ (9,894 ) $ (7,882 ) $ (12,386 5,713 6,451 693 ) Loss per unit(a) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.50 ) $ (0.40 ) $ (0.63 ) (a) Quarterly
loss per unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and
to changes in the number of common partnership units outstanding. F-35 We operate in three business
segments which are based on the nature of business in each segmentreal estate,
retail home sales and finance and insurance. A summary of our business segment
information is shown below (in thousands). December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Total revenue May-96 Siesta
Lago Kissimmee, FL 10,476 2,025 10,835
2,050 2,025 12,885 Real
estate $ 206,690 $ 139,402 $ 102,321 Retail
home sales 15,248 22,027 32,795 Finance
and insurance 14,910 1,425 Dec-01 Siesta
Manor Fenton, MO
719 1,766 1,378 Corporate
and other 2,128 487 2,764 1,419 487 $ 222,657 $ 4,183 4,670 628 Aug-99
163,195 $ 136,494 Silver
Creek Davenport, IA
Operating expenses, cost of manufactured homes sold and
real estate taxes Real
estate 913 5,338 $ 91,756 $ 55,318 $ 39,991 Retail
home sales 287 913 5,625 6,538 23,799 32,565 Finance
and insurance 1,357
156 Feb-04 Silver
Leaf 1,174 Corporate
and other 192 Mansfield, TX 469 652
495 2,896 479 $ 118,236 $ 80,281 $ 74,382 Net segment income(a) 495 3,375 3,870 182 Feb-04 Real
estate $ 114,934 $ Siouxland
Estates S. Sioux City, NE 3,952 425 2,407 2,111 425 4,518 4,943 $ 62,330 Retail
home sales (9,683 ) (1,772 ) 230 Finance
and insurance (638 ) 1,071 204 Corporate
and other (192 ) (469 ) 1,072 Mar-99 Sleepy
Hollow Wichita, KS 120 684 1,007 120 1,691 1,811 517 Apr-99 Smoke
Creek (652 ) $ 104,421 $ 82,914 $ 62,112 Property
management expense Snellville, GA 5,306 1,104 6,282 900 $ 7,127 $ 5,527 $ 4,105
1,104 7,181 8,285 200 Feb-04 South
Arlington Estates Arlington, TX General
and administrative expense $ 29,361 $ 16,855 $ 13,087 Interest expense 2,037 689 4,618 2,814 689 7,432 8,121 366 May-03 Southfork Denton, TX 5,675 912 7,108 1,319 912 8,427 9,339 1,132 May-96 Southridge
Estates Des Moines, IA 4,227 810 4,286
Real
estate $ 52,815 $ 35,283 810 2,138 Retail
home sales 456 477 Finance
and insurance 195 Corporate
and other 3,426 21,626 41,666 $ 56,892 $ 57,386 $ 6,510 7,320 523 Jul-02 Southwind
Village Naples, FL 1,439 8,401 137 1,439 8,537 9,977 43,804 Amortization expense $ 12,400 $ 6,961 $ 5,723 Depreciation expense: 240 Feb-04 Spring
Valley Village $ 59,391 $ 38,482 $ 30,904 Retail home sales 92 298 Finance and insurance 7 9 Corporate and other 124 717 431 $ 59,614 $ 39,506 $ 31,335 Initial public offering costs $ 4,417 Spring Valley, NY 4,310 639 3,640 1,803 $ $ Early termination of debt $ 16,685 639 5,443 6,082 701 $ $ Jul-01 Real estate and retail home asset impairment $ 3,591 $ 1,385 Springdale
Lake Belton, MO 6,940 1,218 $ 7,301 968 1,218 8,269 9,487 923 Oct-96 Stone
Mountain Stone Mountain, GA 7,662 1,844 10,669 1,591 1,844 12,260 14,104 322 Mar-04 Stonegate Shreveport, LA 1,650 421 2,669 429 421 3,098 3,519
Goodwill impairment $ 863 $ $ 13,557 F-36 Interest income $ (1,616 ) $ (1,439 ) $ (1,390 ) Net loss before discontinued operations $ (84,913 ) $ (43,267 ) $ Feb-04 Stoneybrook Greeley, CO 9,766 2,151 12,190 5,037 2,151 17,227 19,378 4,604 Nov-98 Stony
Brook North Raleigh, NC 4,360 958 5,183 bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:41.5pt;">
(48,109 ) Income from discontinued operations $ 1,915 $ 31 $ 1,040 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations $ (8,549 ) $ 3,333 794 958 5,977 6,935 623 $ Preferred unit distributions $ (9,752 ) $ $ Net loss $ (101,299 ) $ (39,903 ) $ (47,069 ) Identifiable assets: Real
estate $ 1,738,226 $ 1,108,967 $ 1,104,228 Retail
home sales 30,053 4,043 8,867 Finance
and insurance 735 984 1,113 Corporate
and other 44,218 12,075 22,529 $ 1,813,232 $ 1,126,069 Jun-00 Suburban
Estates Greenburg, PA 1,671 599 3,574 162 1,136,737 Notes payable and preferred interest
599 3,736 4,335 61 Jun-04 Summit
Oaks Fort Worth, TX Real
estate $ 972,059 $ 768,373 $ 726,201 Retail
home sales 28,516 3,896 9,421 Finance
and insurance 4,924 1,052 6,166 1,025 1,052 7,191 8,243 709 1,047 1,125 Apr-99 Sundown
1,197 $ 1,001,622 $ 773,394 $ 736,819 Capital expenditures Clearfield, UT 3,765 762 4,315 Real
estate $ 644,114 $ 46,683 $ 1,296 762 5,611 6,373 655 Jan-02 Sunny
Acres 137,209 Retail
home sales 4 259 Finance
and insurance 4 44
Somerset, PA 1,525 e="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">4 Corporate
and other 419 282 1 $ 644,537 $ 47,013 $ 137,473 499 2,988 426 499 3,414 3,913 51 Jun-04
(a) Net
segment income represents total revenues less expenses for property operations,
real estate taxes, cost of manufactured homes sold and retail home sales,
finance, insurance and other operations. Net segment income is a measure of the
performance of the properties before the effects of the following expenses: property
management, general and administrative, IPO costs, early termination of debt
costs, impairment charges, depreciation, amortization, interest and impairment
of fixed assets. In March 2005, the Company
secured an additional $100.0 million in financing commitments, consisting
of an unsecured $25.8 million trust preferred security, and a
$75.0 million lease receivables facility secured by substantially all of
the Companys rental homes and the related leases. The $25.8 million trust
preferred security was borrowed on March 15, 2005, matures in
30 years, and bears interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The lease
receivables facility commitment is for $75.0 million, decreasing
$3.0 million quarterly through March 31, 2007. The facility will bear
interest at the 1-month LIBOR plus 7.0%, decreasing to the 1-month
LIBOR plus 3.25% if certain conditions are met. The facility will mature in March 2007.
The closing of the lease receivable facility will reduce the combined borrowing
capacity under the consumer finance facility to $200.0 million and
eliminate $25.0 million of previous chattel financing. The lease
receivables facility is subject to customary closing conditions and
documentation. There can be no assurance that we will close the facility and
fund. F-37 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP June 30, December 31, Assets Rental
and other property, net $ 1,587,040 $ Sunnyside Trooper, PA 1,453 396 2,386 3 396 2,390 2,786 40 1,532,780 Assets held
for sale 3,368 Jun-04 Sunrise
Terrace Newton, IA 2,248 375 2,099
54,123 Cash and
cash equivalents 19,616 39,802 Tenant
notes and other receivables, net 1,140 375 32,826 3,239 3,614 847 Sep-99 Sunset 77 Douglass, KS 221 99 805 (10 ) 99 795 894 108 Sep-98 Sunset
Country Pueblo, CO 3,856 988 5,604 1,414 988 7,018 8,006 1,874 Nov-98 Sunset Mobile Village Aztec, NM 502 19,029 Inventory 307 11,230 Loan
origination costs, net 14,510 14,403 Loan
reserves 35,453 31,019 Goodwill 85,264 85,264 Lease
intangibles and customer relationships, net 16,087 19,106 Prepaid
expenses and other assets 10,315 6,476 Total
assets 234 1,402 167 234 1,569 1,803 169 Nov-95 F-66 Sunset
Village Gainesville, TX
$ 1,804,786 $ 1,813,232 Liabilities and Partners
Capital 223 1,634 576 223 2,210 2,433 Notes
payable (including $25.8 million due to general partner at June 30, 2005) $ 1,089,004 $ 1,001,622 295 Sep-97 Sunset
Vista Magna, UT 4,632 1,127 6,474 613 Liabilities
related to assets held for sale 2,656 29,516 Accounts
payable and accrued expenses 31,273 37,877 Dividends
payable 10,084 15,505 Tenant
deposits and other liabilities 15,109 12,773 Total
liabilities 1,148,126 1,097,293 Commitments and contingencies
1,127 7,087 8,214 199 Feb-04 Sunshine
City Plantation, FL 10,066 2,271 12,164 1,330 2,271 13,494 15,765 1,342 Oct-00 &0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Partners capital Preferred
OP units 144,250 144,250 Common OP units:
Sycamore
Square Wichita, KS 120 65 374 General partner 486,112 539,382 Limited partners
28 65 402 467 26,298 32,307 Total
partners capital 656,660 715,939 Total liabilities and partners capital $ 1,804,786 41
$ 1,813,232 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-38 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP Three Months Ended
Dec-98 Tallview
Terrace Sioux City, IA 2,075 Six Months Ended 2,384 1,391 422 3,775 4,197 933 Mar-99 Tanglewood Huntsville, TX 2,692 659 4,676 (48 ) 659 4,628 5,287 606 Nov-96 Terrace Casper, WY 1,101 165 1,200 263 165 1,463
2005 2004 2005 2004 Revenue 1,628 193 Dec-97 Terrace
Heights Dubuque, IA 5,827 1,186 6,932 Rental income
692 1,186 7,624 8,810 205 Feb-04 Terrace II Casper, WY 950 94 535 921 94 1,456 1,550 304 May-01 Terrell
Crossing Terrell, TX 1,250 330 1,936 3,069 $ 51,366 $ 47,884 $ 102,224 $ 86,210 Sales of manufactured homes 18,288 2,082 26,278 2,789 5,005 5,335 570 Jul-02 The
Meadows Aurora, CO 11,840
Utility and other income 5,835 5,114 11,481 9,097 Net consumer finance interest income (expense) 155 32 205 (40 ) Total revenue 75,644 55,112 140,188 98,056 Expenses Property operations 20,042 1,800 10,192 1,960 1,800 12,152 13,952 2,575 Jun-99 17,626 40,363 30,234 Real estate taxes 4,407 4,080 8,698 7,390 Cost of manufactured homes sold 16,190 1,809 24,405 2,365 Retail home sales, finance and insurance 4,112 1,498 7,317 2,079 Property management 2,494 1,600 4,759 3,054 General and administrative 6,259 4,304 11,618 19,099 The Pines Ladson, SC 286 1,676 139 286 1,815 2,101 54 Feb-04 The
Towneship at Clifton Wichita, KS 5,720 1,408 9,921 859 1,408 10,780 Initial public offering related costs 4,417 12,188 1,444
Early termination of debt 13,427 Depreciation and amortization 22,224 17,242 42,255 32,152 Interest expense 16,544 12,729 31,817 27,209 Total expenses 92,272 60,888 171,232 141,426 Interest income (277 ) (450 ) (660 ) (792 ) Loss from continuing operations (16,351 ) (5,326 ) (30,384 ) Aug-97 The
Vineyards ) Income from discontinued operations 72 343 1,000 795 Clifton, CO 1,823 296 1,720 Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations 52 (678 ) Net loss (16,227 659 296 2,379 ) (4,983 ) (30,062 ) (41,783 ) Preferred unit distributions (2,971 2,675
) (2,578 ) (5,942 ) (3,810 ) Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders $ (19,198 ) $ Feb-00 The
Woodlands Wichita, KS ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders
2,863 732 4,389 354 732 4,743 5,475 591 Dec-96 Thornton
Estates Denver, CO 6,982 1,012 5,739 General Partner $ (18,193 ) $ (7,126 926 1,012 6,665
) $ (34,065 ) $ 7,677 1,723 Nov-98 Timberland Oklahoma City, OK 1,115 (42,095 ) Limited Partners (1,005 ) (435 ) (1,939 ) (3,498 ) $ (19,198 ) $ (7,561 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Net loss per common OP unit from continuing operations $ (0.45 ) $ (0.18 ) $ (0.84 )
270 2,386 344 270 2,730 3,000 409 Jan-97 Torrey
Hills Flint, MI 9,749 1,697 8,480 981 1,697 (1.24 ) Income per common OP unit from discontinued operations 0.01 0.01 0.02 Net loss per common OP unit $ (0.45 ) $ 9,461 11,158 258 Feb-04 Trailmont
(0.17 ) $ (0.83 ) $ (1.22 ) Weighted
average of units outstanding 2,298 476 2,784
43,260 43,269 43,262 37,531 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-39 AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP 121 Six Months Ended 2005 2004 476 2,905 3,382
78 Cash flow
from operating activities Net loss attributable to Partners
Feb-04
Twin Oaks Wichita, KS 4,164 794 5,643 662 794 6,305 7,099 (36,004 ) $ (45,593 ) Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 42,255 32,152 963 Jan-97 Twin Pines Goshen, IN 5,360 1,093 OP unit grant compensation expense 326 10,144 Preferred unit distributions declared 5,156 3,810 Partnership preferred unit distributions declared 6,400 526 1,09tyle="line-height:8.5pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">786 Non-cash ARC IPO related costs 389 6,926 8,019 199 Feb-04 Valley
Verde Las Cruces, NM 2,750 510 2,536 1,099 510 3,635 4,145 372 Apr-02 Valley
ViewBlandon Fleetwood, PA 90 531 64 90 Early termination of debt 7,100 Depreciation included in income from discontinued
operations 5 1,859 Loss on sale of discontinued operations 678 Gain on sale of manufactured homes 595 685 10 (1,873 ) Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions (10,340 ) 9,110 Net cash provided by operating activities 989 18,971 Cash flow
from investing activities Acquisition of Hometown communities (507,136 ) Acquisition of D.A.M. and other communities Jun-04 Valley
ViewDanboro Danboro, PA 3,123 1,006 6,044 31 1,006 6,075 (14,754 ) Purchases of manufactured homes (68,300 ) (44,856 ) Proceeds from community sales 48,721 Proceeds from manufactured home sales 13,014 Community improvements and equipment purchases (32,605 ) (10,068 ) Net cash used in investing activities (39,170 ) (576,814 ) Cash flow
from financing activities Cash flow from REIT IPO Common stock offering
7,081 101 Jun-04 Valley
ViewEphrata Ephrata, PA 1,041 392 2,366 437,790 Preferred stock offering 125,000 Common stock offering expenses (36,813 ) Preferred stock offering expenses (5,593 ) Cash flow from REIT IPO related financing transactions 54 392 2,419 2,811 40 Jun-04 Valley
ViewEphrata II Ephrata, PA 168 966 9 168 975 1,143 16 Jun-04 Valley
ViewHoney Honey Brook, PA 1,874 527 3,175 295 527 3,470 3,998 54 Jun-04 Valley
ViewMorgantown Morgantown, PA 82 486 Debt issued in the financing transactions 500,000 Debt paid in the financing transactions
46 82 (439,048 ) Payment of loan origination costs (8,122 ) Release of restricted cash 532 614 10 Jun-04 Valley
ViewTuckerton Reading, PA 166 980 40 166 1,021 1,187 17 12,278 Release of loan reserves 19,089 New loan reserves (14,247 Jun-04 Valley
ViewWernersville Wernersville, PA 79 472 14 79 487
) Proceeds from issuance of debt (including $25.0 million
from parent) 155,483 5,000 Repayment of debt (94,352 ) (5,690 ) Payment of OP unit dividends (27,045 ) (6,474 ) Payment of preferred dividends (5,156 ) (2,091 ) Payment of partnership preferred distributions (786 ) Repurchase of OP units (1,836 ) Restricted cash 456 Loan reserves (4,434 ) (992 ) Loan origination costs (3,879 ) (1,589 ) Net cash provided by financing activities 17,995 578,954 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (20,186 ) 21,111 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 39,802 26,631 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 19,616 $ 47,742 Non-cash
financing and investing transactions: 566 8 Jun-04 Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions Viking
Villa Ogden, UT 4,120 775 $ $ 122,863 Preferred OP units issued in connection with acquisitions $ $ 33,142
4,180 Notes receivable for manufactured home sales $ 11,402 $ Supplemental
cash flow information: 0pt;">
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 33,931 $ 28,243 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-40 493 775 4,673 5,448
AFFORDABLE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES LP 1. Business, Basis of
Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Affordable
Residential Communities LP (the Partnership, Operating Partnership or OP)
is a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, renovation, repositioning
and operation of primarily all-age manufactured home communities, the retail
sale and financing of manufactured homes, the rental of manufactured homes and
other related businesses including acting as agent in the sale of homeowners
insurance and related products, all exclusively to residents and prospective
residents of our communities. We were organized in July 1998 and operate
primarily through our subsidiaries. Our general partner is Affordable
Residential Communities Inc. (ARC, General Partner, or REIT). On February 18,
2004, ARC completed an initial public offering (IPO) of approximately
22.3 million shares of its common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding
approximately 2.3 million shares sold by selling stockholders) and
5.0 million shares of its preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The
net proceeds to ARC from its IPO of common stock and preferred stock were
$517.5 million before expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592
shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option generating net proceeds to ARC of $14.0 million. All
of the proceeds from the IPO were contributed by ARC to the Partnership in
exchange for 23.1 million Common OP units and 5.0 million Series A
Preferred OP units. In conjunction with the IPO, ARC also completed a financing
transaction consisting of $500.0 million of new mortgage debt and the
repayment of certain existing indebtedness (see Note 2). Concurrent
with ARCs IPO and the financing transaction noted above, we acquired 90
manufactured home communities from Hometown America, L.L.C. (Hometown). The
90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and totaled 26,406 homesites.
The total purchase price for these communities and related assets was
approximately $615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $93.1 million. See Note 2 for a discussion of the Companys
significant 2004 acquisitions. As of June 30,
2005, we owned and operated 315 communities (net of one community classified as
discontinued operations, see Note 10) consisting of 62,942 homesites (net
of 126 homesitean" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Villa West
(UT) West Jordan, UT 5,629 844 ARCs common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol ARC. ARCs Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ARC-PA. ARC
has no public trading history prior to February 12, 2004. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of F-41 assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts. The interim
consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments that
are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of the Partnership, and all such adjustments are of a normal and
recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period ended June 30,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our December 31, 2004 financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include
all of our accounts, which include the results of operations of the
manufactured home communities acquired only for the periods subsequent to the
date of acquisition. We have eliminated all significant interentity balances
and transactions. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Rental and Other Property We carry
rental property at cost, less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize
significant renovations and improvements that substantially improve asset
quality and/or extend the useful life of assets and depreciate them over their
estimated remaining useful lives. We expense maintenance and repairs as
incurred. Depreciation is computed primarily
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
The estimated useful lives of the various classes of rental property assets are
as follows: Asset Class 4,803 645 844 Estimated Useful Manufactured home communities and improvements 10 to 30 Buildings 10 to 20 Rental homes
5,448 6,292 929 Aug-00 Village
North Lewisville, TX Furniture and other equipment 6,946 1,193 6,155 731 5 Computer software and hardware 3 We evaluate
the recoverability of our investment in rental property whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the net book value
of the asset is questionable. Our assessment of the recoverability of rental
property includes, but is not limited to, recent operating results and expected
net operating cash flows from future operations. In the event that facts and
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of rental property may be
impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability in which we compare the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the assets
carrying amount to determine if an impairment adjustment is required. If this
review indicates that the assets carrying amount will not be fully
recoverable, we will reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated
fair value. We recorded no impairment charges during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our estimate of
the depreciable life of our rental homes from 10 years to 3 years.
Homes in our rental home portfolio will now be depreciated over 3 years of
service to an estimated salvage value of 70%. This change was made to align the
depreciable lives of our rental homes to our intent to sell homes from our
rental home portfolio after a 3 year period to reduce the costs of repairs
and maintenance. This change in estimate did not have a material impact on our
financial positions, results of operations or cash flows. F-42 Revenue Recognition We
recognize rental income on homesites and homes when earned and due from
residents. Leases entered into by tenants for the rental of a site are
generally month-to-month and are renewable by mutual agreement of the resident
and us or, in some cases, as provided by statute. Leases entered into by home
renters are generally one year in duration and are renewable by mutual
agreement between the home renter and us. We defer rent received in advance and
recognize it in income when earned. On lease with option to purchase contracts,
we defer recognition of all down-payments, supplemental lease payments and
sales commissions until the point of sale, which generally is at the end of the
lease term. We recognize revenues from manufactured home sales when we
receive the down payment, the buyer arranges financing, we transfer title,
possession and other attributes of ownership to the buyer, and we have no
further obligations to perform significant additional activities. OP Unit Grants We have
included a charge of $10.1 million in general and administrative expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2004, representing the value of 530,000
common OP units that were granted on February 18, 2004 under our 2003
equity incentive plan and vested on the date of grant. We valued the units at
$19.00 per unit, the price at which ARC sold shares in its IPO (see
Note 2). In addition, during 2004, we granted 95,000 restricted common OP
units that vest over five years. In June 2004, 42,500 of these restricted
units were forfeited and in October 2004, an additional h="40" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
1,193 6,886 8,079 665 Apr-97 Village
Park Greensboro, NC 2,617 856 4,644 733 Vested units may not be sold by Mr. Jackson
until the first anniversary date of vesting without the prior written consent
of the Compensation Committee. All units, vested and unvested, are entitled to
receive dividends and to vote unless forfeited. We have recorded the unvested portion of the 72,000
outstanding restricted common OP units as of June 30, 2005 as unearned
compensation (a compomes New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 856 5,377 Interest and Internal Cost Capitalization We capitalize interest costs (using our average cost of
borrowings) and internal costs (using actual time spent and related costs) on
development of long-lived assets from the date we begin substantive activities
through the date we place such assets into service in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest and SFAS No. 67,
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental
Operations of Real Estate Projects, respectively. The long-lived
assets on which we capitalize interest include general construction activities
in our communities, manufactured homes and, in the case of the communities
acquired, the cost of the vacant homesites we acquired on which we are making
improvements and placing a manufactured home for rent or sale. We capitalized
interest and internal costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to
$1.2 million and $1.8 million capitalized during the same periods in
2004. F-43 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive
Loss Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(a component of partners capital) as of June 30, 2005 represent
unrecognized gains on our interest rate swap, which qualifies as a cash flow
hedge and will be marked to market over the life of the instrument. Including
these unrecognized gains or losses, our comprehensive loss for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 was $18.5 million and
$34.1 million, respectively, compared with a comprehensive loss of
$5.3 million and $40.8 million during the same periods in 2004. Reclassifications Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to
conform to the current year presentation. New Accounting Pronouncements In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost relating to
share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on
the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We will be
required to apply SFAS 123R as of the interim reporting period beginning January 1,
2006. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation
arrangements, including options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. We do not
expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to have a material impact upon our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows. REIT IPO and Hometown Acquisition On February 18,
2004, ARCt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;"> 6,233 565 Mar-01 Vogel
Manor MHC Arnold, MO 1,033 144 823 < completed its IPO of approximately 22.3 million shares of its
common stock at $19.00 per share (excluding approximately 2.3 million
shares sold by selling stockholders) and 5.0 million shares of its
preferred stock priced at $25.00 per share. The net proceeds to ARC from its
IPO of common stock and preferred stock were $517.5 million before
expenses. On March 17, 2004, ARC issued 791,592 shares of common stock
pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment option
generating net proceeds to the Company of $14.0 million. Concurrent with
the IPO, ARC also completed the refinancing of $240.0 million of its
mortgage debt and raised an additional $260.0 million of new mortgage
debt. The new mortgage debt at the time of the IPO consisted of
$215.3 million of 10 year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of
5.53%, $100.7 million of 5-year fixed rate debt with an interest rate of
5.05% and $184.0 million of floating rate debt. Proceeds from the IPO and
new debt were used to purchase the Hometown communities, repay ARCs Rental
Home Credit Facility and redeem the Preferred Interest issued by one of ARCs
subsidiaries (see Note 6 to ARCs consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K). On February 18, 2004 and
subsequent dates thereafter, we acquired 90 manufactured home communities from
Hometown. The 90 acquired communities are located in 24 states and include
26,406 homesites. The total purchase price for all the communities we acquired
consisted of the following (in thousands): Cash purchase price $ 522,131 Debt assumed in connection with the acquisition 93,139 258 144 1,081 1,225 260 Total
purchase price $ 615,270 F-44 Our purchase price allocation is as
follows (in thousands): Land $ 90,296 Rental and other property 494,429 Manufactured homes 9,761 Lease intangibles 811 Customer relationships 14,496 Notes receivable 5,477 $ 615,270 May-99 Washington
Mobile Estates Ogden, UT 4,517 676 3,848 613 676 4,461 D.A.M.
Portfolio Acquisition On June 30,
2004, we acquired 36 manufactured home communities from D.A.M. MASTER ENTITY,
L.P. The communities are located in 3 states and include 3,573 homesites. The
total purchase price (including the costs of manufactured homes) was
approximately $65.5 million, including assumed indebtedness with a fair
value of $29.7 million. In addition to cash and the assumption of debt,
this acquisition was funded through the issuance of Series B, C and D
Partnership Preferred Units (PPUs), for proceeds totaling $33.1 million.
All of the D series PPUs totaling $8.0 million were redeemed for cash on
July 6, 2004. See Note 3 for further discussion of the PPUs. Our purchase price allocation is as
follows (in thousands): Land $ 9,225 Rental and other property 55,501 Manufactured homes 803 Customer relationships 52 Other assets/liabilities, net (78 ) Total purchase price allocation $ 65,503 We have prepared the following
unaudited pro forma income statement information as if the Hometown and D.A.M.
acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The pro forma data is not
necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if we
had consummated the acquisitions on January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except per
share information): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 fter:avoid;"> 5,137 769 Aug-00 Washingtonville
Manor Washingtonville, NY 1,390 292 1,668 112 292 1,780 2,072 222 Jul-01 Weatherly
Estates I Lebanon, TN 891 5,020
Actual Pro forma Actual Pro forma Revenue $ 75,644 $ 57,676 $ 140,188 $ 111,513 Total expenses 92,272 63,198 171,232 153,962 Interest income (277 ) (450 ) 285 891 5,305 (660 ) (852 ) Loss from
mes New Roman" style="font-size:7.5pt;">6,196 145 Feb-04 Weatherly
Estates II (16,351 ) (5,072 ) (30,384 ) (41,597 ) Income from discontinued operations 124 343 322 Clarksville, TN
1,100 Net loss $ (16,227 ) $ (4,729 ) $ (30,062 ) $ (40,497 ) Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders $ (19,198 ) $ (7,307 ) $ (36,004 ) $ (44,307 355 1,097 202 Net loss
attributable to common OP unitholders per unit $ (0.44 ) $ (0.17 )
355 1,299 1,654 37 $ (0.83 ) $ (1.18 ) Weighted average units outstanding 43,260 Feb-04 West Cloud
Commons Salina, KS 1,047 43,269 43,262 37,531 F-45 Other
Acquisitions During the
period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, in addition to
the Hometown and D.A.M. portfolio acquisitions, we acquired six manufactured
home communities from unaffiliated third parties for approximately
$16.5 million in cash and $3.8 million in assumed debt. We accounted
for these acquisitions utilizing the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, have allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of their
acquisition. We allocated the majority of the purchase price to the rental
property and intangible assets, including customer relationships and leases
intangibles. No acquisitions were made in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005. We have not presented pro forma results of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if these other acquisitions
were made on the first day of the year, as the effects of these other
acquisitions are not material to our financial position, results of operations
or cash fidth="7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">
275 2,161 154 275 2,315 2,590 F-46 The table below summarizes all of
our manufactured home community acquisitions for the period January 1,
2004 through June 30, 2005: Date Portfolio Community Location Homesites Feb-04 NA Weatherly Estates I Lebanon, TN 270 Feb-04 NA 329 Jul-98 Western
Hills Fort Lauderdale, FL Weatherly Estates II Clarksville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA 100 Oaks Fultondale, AL 11,811 1,489 8,499 man" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> 235 Feb-04 HTA 5,205
Jonesboro Jonesboro, GA 75 Feb-04 HTA Bermuda Palms Indio, CA 185 Feb-04 HTA Breazeale Laramie, WY 117 Feb-04 HTA 1,489 13,704 15,193 2,166 Goshen, IN 370 Feb-04 May-01 Western Mobile Estates West Valley City, UT 3,759 570 3,429 232 570 3,661 4,231 53 Jul-04 F-67 Initial Costs Costs Capitalized Gross Amounts at which Carried Community Name Locatipadding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:11.7pt;">
HTA Butler Creek Augusta, GA 376 Feb-04 HTA Camden Point Kingsland, GA 268 Feb-04 HTA Carnes Crossing Summerville, SC 604 Feb-04 HTA Castlewood Estates Encumbrances Mableton, GA Land Buildings and
334 Feb-04 HTA Casual Estates Liverpool, NY 961 Buildings and Land Buildings and Total Accumulated Date of Western
Park Fayetteville, AR 1,606
Feb-04 HTA Riverdale Riverdale, GA 481 Feb-04 HTA Columbia Heights Grand Forks, ND 302 Feb-04 HTA Conway Plantation Conway, SC 299 Feb-04 1,408 447 247 1,855 >
HTA Crestview 2,102 448 Jul-99 Westlake Oklahoma City, OK 2,898
Stillwater, OK 238 Feb-04 HTA Country Village Jacksonville, FL 643 Feb-04 HTA Eagle Creek Tyler, TX 194 Feb-04 HTA Eagle Point Marysville, WA 230 Feb-04 HTA 836 5,499 328 836 5,827 6,663 818 Oct-97 Westmoor Oklahoma City, OK 2,253 498 5,400 250 498
Falcon Farms Port Byron, IL 215 Feb-04 HTA Forest Creek Elkhart, IN 167 Feb-04 HTA Fountainvue Lafontaine, IN 5,650 6,148 925 120 Feb-04 HTA Foxhall Village Raleigh, NC 315 Feb-04 HTA Golden Valley
Jul-98 Westview Gillette, WY 2,153 Douglasville, GA 131 Feb-04 HTA Huron Estates Cheboygan, MI 111 Feb-04 HTA Indian Rocks Largo, FL 148 Feb-04 HTA Knoll Terrace Corvallis, OR 212 Feb-04 HTA La Quinta Ridge Indio, CA 331 2,102 323 331 2,425 151 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Montgomery, AL 396 Feb-04 HTA Lakewood Estates Davenport, IA 180 Feb-04 HTA 2,756 280 Nov-95
Landmark Village Fairburn, GA Orlando, FL 554 134 793 16 134 809 943 82 Oct-00 524 Feb-04 HTA Marnelle Fayetteville, GA 205 Feb-04 HTA Oak Ridge Elkhart, IN 204 Feb-04 HTA Oakwood Forest Greensboro, NC 482 Feb-04 HTA Pedalers Pond Lake Wales, FL 214 Feb-04 HTA Pinecrest Village Shreveport, LA 446 Feb-04 HTA Whispering
Hills Coal Valley, IL 384 92 777 15 92 792 884 121 Jul-97 Whitney
Pleasant Ridge Mount Pleasant, MI 305 Feb-04 HTA Presidents Park Grand Forks, ND 174 Feb-04 HTA Riverview Clackamas, OR 133 Feb-04 HTA Gainesville, FL 2,476 450 2,662 Saddlebrook N. Charleston, SC 425 Feb-04 HTA Sherwood 286 450 2,948 Hartford City, IN 134 Feb-04 HTA Southwind Village Naples, FL 3,398 671 Aug-99 Wikiup Henderson, CO 11,402337 Feb-04 HTA Springfield Farms 1,475 8,383 1,920 1,475 10,303 11,778
Brookline Sta, MO 290 Feb-04 HTA Stonegate Shreveport, LA 157 Feb-04 HTA Terrace Heights Dubuque, IA 2,505 Mar-99 Willow
Creek Estates Ogden, UT
Feb-04 HTA Torrey Hills Flint, MI 377 F-47 480 Feb-04 HTA
2,766 (26 ) 480 2,739 3,219 22 Sep-04 Willow
Springs Fort Worth, TX 1,639 262 2,241 837 262 3,078 3,340 406 Jan-97 Twin Pines Goshen, IN 238 Feb-04 HTA Villa Flint, MI 319 Feb-04 HTA Winter Haven Oaks Winterhaven, FL 343 Feb-04 HTA Green Park South Pelham, AL 421 Feb-04 HTA Hunter Ridge Jonesboro, GA 838 Feb-04 HTA Friendly Village Lawrenceville, GA 203 Feb-04 HTA Misty Winds Corpus Christi, TX 354 Feb-04 HTA Shadow Hills Orlando, FL Willow
Terrace Fort Worth, TX 2,261 515 3,369 778 515 Feb-04 HTA Smoke Creek Snellville, GA 264 Feb-04 4,147 4,662 580 HTA Woodlands of Kennesaw Kennesaw, GA 273 Feb-04 HTA Sunset Vista Magna, UT 207 Feb-04 HTA Sea Pines Mobile, AL 429 Feb-04 Nov-97 Windsor
Mobile Estates HTA Woodland Hills Montgomery, AL 628 Feb-04 HTA The Pines Ladson, SC 204 7,690 1,178 6,701 824 1,178 7,525 8,703 2,261 Feb-04 HTA Shady Hills Nashville, TN 251 Feb-04 HTA Trailmont Goodlettsville, TN 131 Feb-04 HTA Chisholm Creek Wichita, KS 254 Febface="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;"> Aug-00
HTA Big Country Cheyenne, WY 251 Feb-04 HTA Heritage Point Montgomery, AL 264 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Lithia Springs, GA 103 Feb-04 Winter
Haven Oaks Winter Haven, FL 3,700 804 4,754 80 HTA Plantation Estates Douglasville, GA 138 Feb-04 HTA 804 4,834 5,638 140 Feb-04
Green Acres Petersburg, VA 182 Feb-04 HTA Lakeside Woodlake Greensboro, NC 2,292 887 5,267 541 887 5,808 6,695 168 Mar-04 Woodlands
of Kennesaw Davenport, IA 124 Feb-04 HTA Evergreen Village Pleasant View, UT 238 Feb-04 HTA Four Seasons Fayetteville, GA 214 Feb-04 HTA Alafia Riverfront
Kennesaw, GA 4,750 997 5,806 1,075 997 6,881 Riverview, FL 96 Feb-04 HTA Highland Elkhart, IN 246 Feb-04 HTA Birchwood Farms Birch Run, MI 143 Feb-04 HTA Cedar Terrace Cedar Rapids, IA 255 Feb-04 HTA Five Seasons Davenport Davenport, IA 270 Feb-04 HTA Silver Creek Davenport, IA 280 Feb-04 HTA Encantada Las Cruces, NM 354 Feb-04 HTA Royal Crest Los Alamos, NM 180 Feb-04 HTA Brookside Village Dallas, TX 394 Feb-04 7,878 198 Feb-04 Zoppes Seagoville, TX 564 57 473 123 57 596 653 HTA Meadow Glen Keller, TX 409 Feb-04 HTA 110 Jan-00 Miscellaneous
other assets* Silver Leaf Mansfield, TX 145 Mar-04 HTA Lamplighter Village Mariettsize:1.0pt;"> 79,020
431 Mar-04 HTA 6,162 1,294 6,162 7,455 1,838 Total $ 1,001,622 $ 211,656
Shadowood Acworth, GA 506 Mar-04 HTA Stone Mountain Stone Mountain, GA 354 Mar-04 HTA Marion Village Marion, IA
of Total
Homesites
of Total
Homesites
Per Occupied
Homesite Per
Month(2)
32
ARC may issue equity in the future in connection with
acquisitions or strategic transactions, to adjust its ratio of debt to equity,
including through repayment of outstanding debt, to fund expansion of its
operations, upon exchange of the notes, or for other purposes. To the extent
ARC issues additional equity securities, the percentage ownership into which
the notes being offered in this offering would exchange could be reduced.
ilable financing
sources to fund these distributions, this will reduce the availability of these
funds for other purposes, including repurchase of the notes and the purchase of
homes necessary to implement our programs for increasing occupancy. This could
adversely affect our financial condition and results from operations and
ability to expand our business and further fund our operating and growth
initiatives, any of which could adversely affect the market price of the notes
and ARC common stock. On September 21, 2005, ARCs board of directors
announced that it had eliminated the quarterly dividend on ARCs common stock
for the quarter ending September 30, 2005.
Six Months
160
55
costs
2004
Operations
<:1.0pt;">
Six Months
Ended
Year Ended
*
e-height:7.0pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">
"padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:7.9pt;">
nt-size:1.0pt;">
El Dorado
<>
13,087
Total/Weighted Average
(84,913
)
style="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:right;">
(41,783
375
1pt;page-break-after:avoid;">
%
44,920
June 30,
361
June 30,
June 30,
December 31,
width="35" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:26.6pt;">
Depreciation and amortization from discontinued
operations
)
)
yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:19.1pt;">
Total/Weighted Average
common partnership unitholders
ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.1pt;">
2,211
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
June 30,
Year Ended
December 31,
Magnolia Circle
)
gin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">(1,040
57,386
ont size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">240
1¤2% Senior Exchangeable Notes
due 2025, as if the sale of all communities and the sale of the notes had both
occurred on June 30, 2005.
You should read the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information, together with the notes thereto, in
conjunction with the more detailed information contained in the financial
statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Partnership and ARC included
and incorporated by reference in this prospectus.
Average
Operations(1)
unitholders from continuing operations
Operations(1)
Sales of manufactured homes
284
$
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
(in thousands,
except per unit data)
15,599
)
.0pt;">
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
(in thousands,
except per unit data)
Total/Weighted Average
309
)
25,826
pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.3pt;">
<:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;">
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
At June 30, 2005
(in thousands,
except share data)
New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Twin Pines
459
Total/Weighted Average
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
(in thousands,
except per share data)
in:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">294
Sales of manufactured homes
border:none;font-size:1.0pt;padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt;">
113,535
%
k-after:avoid;">
$
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(in thousands,
except per share data)
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
(in thousands, except per share data)
Ewing Trace
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
(in thousands, except per share data)
-size:1.0pt;">
<0pt .0001pt 20.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Property management
Average
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
O='55',FILE='C:\fc\29914032315_D10496_623837\17291-2-cg.htm',USER='jmsproofassembler',CD='Oct 26 14:02 2005' -->
Communities
(803
ttom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
437
%
Communities
2005
Home renter
activity:
pt;">
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MDTotal/Weighted Average
342
97.5
Home
renter move ins
We
determine the fair value of the tangible community assets we acquire (other
than rental homes discussed below), including land, land improvements and
buildings, by valuing the property as if it were vacant. We then allocate the
as-if-vacant value to land, land improvements and buildings based on our
determination of the relative fair values of these assets. We determine the
as-if-vacant fair value of the real estate by considering the expected lease-up
period for individual communities (based generally on vacancies in the
surrounding market and lease-up history for the communities acquired), the
expected lost rental revenue during the lease-up period (based on contractual
rental rates), and expected move-in bonuses to tenants.
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and are
reflected as real estate and retail asset impairments in the expenses section
of the consolidated statements of operations.
12,169
Hazleton, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average
valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.35pt;">
Average
$
g:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:14.25pt;">
Average
5,713
Corporate
and other
(3)
pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.1pt;">
$
Average
"border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;border-left:none;border-right:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0pt .2pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.0pt;">
pt;">)
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Cost of Manufactured Homes Sold. The cost of manufactured
homes sold was $24.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as
compared to $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an
increase of $22.0 million.ing:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.9pt;">
k-after:avoid;">
tom" style="border:none;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.0pt;">
/p>
occupied homesite(1)
valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
style="font-size:10.0pt;">281
"line-height:11.7pt;margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">
Huntsville, Texas
2003
nt size="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Retail
home sales and finance
-size:1.0pt;">
impairment
>83.9
<
(3) Excludes
$10.1 million of compensation expense related to stock issued in connection
with ARCs IPO.
During the
year ended December 31, 2003, we substantially completed the redirection
of our retail home sales efforts by selling 11 of our retail dealerships,
ceasing operations in the remaining five retail dealerships and beginning
in-community retail home sales activities in nearby communities owned by us. With
respect to five retail dealerships we closed, we relocated the inventory to
nearby manufactured home communities we own.
Net Loss Attributable to Common
Partnership Unitholders. As a result of the foregoing, our net loss attributable to
common partnership unitholders was $39.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2003, as compared to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2002, a decrease of $7.2 million, or 15%. The decrease was due to
increases of $33.3 million in rental income, $3.7 million in utility
and other income, and $2.3 million in income and gain on sale of
discontinued operations and decreases of $7.4 million in cost of
manufactured homes sold, $1.2 million in retail home sales, finance,
insurance and other operations expense and retail home sales and insurance
asset and goodwill impairment of $12.1 million offset by decreases of
$10.3 million in manufactured home sales, and increases of $11.1 million
in property operations expense, $3.6 million in real estate taxes,
$1.4 million in property management expenses, $3.7 million in general
and administrative expenses, $9.4 million in depreciation and amortization
and $13.5 million in interest expense.
Communities(4)
Segment(4)
01pt;page-break-after:avoid;">
91.7
185
homesite(3)
(3) Average
monthly real estate revenue per total homesite defined as total real estate
revenue divide by average total homesites divided by the number of months in
the period.
Communities
2003
$
In addition,
in order to facilitate sales of new and existing homes, we also plan to finance
a significant portion of our home sales during 2005. We have a $125 million
consumer finance facility to support our in-community home sales financing
program under which we may finance up to 90% of the principal amount of
qualifying loans made to qualifying home buyers.
Warranties provided by us are subject to a variety of state
laws and regulations. Our sale of manufactured homes may be subject to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant thereto. Sales practices are governed at both the
federal and state level through various consumer protection trade practices and
public accommodation laws and regulations.
Environmental Matters
Debt
of Total
Debt
Average
Interest
RatePresident, Chief Operating Officer and Director
width="8" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.0pt;">
Date
Debt
Service
Maturity
as a Juris Doctorate Degree, from
Southern Methodist University where he currently serves as Chairman of the
Board of Trustees.
of Units
of Units
Owned
%
ce="Times New Roman" style="font-size:9.0pt;">2008
Our partnership agreement expressly limits ARCs liability
by providing that ARC and its officers and directors are not liable or
accountable in damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for errors in
June 30,
Exchange Rights below. We are not
required to maintain a sinking fund for the repayment of the notes.
on Effective
per share and to maximize returns to our stockholders. Our key
operating objectives include the following:
As
of June 30, 2005, approximately
69% of our homesites were located in our 20 largest markets. Upon
completion of the proposed sale of the 79 communities, approximately 79% of our
homesites will be in our 20 largest markets. We believe we have a leading
market share in 15 of these markets, based on number of homesites. To the
extent that we acquire new communities, we focus our growth in select markets
characterized by limited development, expensive alternative housing costs, a
strong, diversified economic base and/or opportunity to increase our market
share and achieve economies of scale. Increasing our presence and market share
enables us to (i) achieve operating efficiencies and economies of scale by
leveraging our local property management infrastructure and other operating
overhead over a larger number of communities and homesites, (ii) provide
potential residents with a broader range of affordable housing options in their
market, (iii) increase our visibility and brand recognition and leverage advertising
costs and (iv) obtain more favorable terms and faster
h, the financing of sales of
newer homes and the leasing of newer homes with an option to purchase.
In-Community Retail Home Sales and
Consumer Financing Initiative. Our retail home sales
business consists of the sales of manufactured homes in our communities to
residents and prospective residents at reasonable prices. Through our consumer
financing initiative, we provide loans to qualified residents and prospective
residents to facilitate purchases of manufactured homes located in our
communities. It is our practice to acquire additional manufactured home
inventory for sale in coordination with the sale of our existing inventory.
of Total
Homesites
of Total
Homesites
Per Occupied
Homesite Per
Month(2)
82.7
0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:3.0pt;">
0.0000
· to comply with the
requirements of the SEC in order to effect or maintain qualification of the
indenture under the Trust Indenture Act, as contemplated by the indenture or
otherwise;
Agreement between Us and ARC;
Governing
Law
We expect
that DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any payment of principal of, premium,
if any, or interest (including liquidated damages) on the global security, will
credit participants accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their
respective beneficial interests in the principal amount of the global security
as shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. We also expect that payments by
participants or indirect participants to owners of beneficial interests in the
global security held through such participants or indirect participants will be
governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the
responsibility of such participants or indirect participants. We will not have
any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to, or
payments made on account of, beneficial interests in the global security for
any note or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to
such beneficial interests or for any other aspect of the relationship between
DTC and its participants or indirect participants or the relationship between
such participants or indirect participants and the owners of beneficial
interests in the global security owning through such participants.
We and ARC
have also agreed to provide to each registered holder copies of the prospectus,
notify each registered holder when the shelf registration statement has become
effective and take certain other actions as are required to permit unrestricted
resales of the notes and the ARC common stock issuable upon the exchange of the
notes. A holder who sells securities pursuant to the shelf registration
statement generally will be required to be named as a selling securityholder in
the related prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers and will be
bound by the provisions of the registration rights agreement that are
applicable to that holder (including certain indemnification provisions). If a
shelf registration statement covering those securities is not effective, they
may not be sold or otherwise transferred except pursuant to an exemption from
registration under the Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws
or in a transaction not subject to those laws. Each holder must notify us not
later than three business days prior to any proposed sale by that holder
pursuant to the shelf registration statement. This notice will be effective for
five business days. We and ARC may suspend the holders use of the prospectus
for a reasonable period not to exceed 30 days in any 90-day period,
and not to exceed an aggregate of 90 days in any 12-month period, if
we and ARC, in our reasonable judgment, believe we may possess material
non-public information the disclosure of which would have a material adverse
effect on us and our subsidiaries taken as a whole. Each holder, by its
acceptance of a note, agrees to hold any communication by us in response to a
notice of a proposed sale in confidence.
Rate
maturity
thousands)
380
Consumer
Finance Facility Due 2008
· rank senior to the common
partnership units as to the payment of distributions and as to the distribution
of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up;
persons holding a 10% or
more (by vote or value) beneficial interest in ARC or The Partnership;
4 of 1 percent of the
stated redemption price of the note at maturity times the number of complete
years to maturity after the U.S. Holder acquires the note). Under the market
discount rules, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any partial principal
payment on a note, or any gain realized on the sale, exchange, retirement or
other disposition of a note, as ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (i) the
amount of such payment or realized gain or (ii) the market discount which
has not previously been included in income and is treated as having accrued on
such note at the time of such payment or disposition. Market discount will be
considered to accrue ratably during the period from the date of acquisition to
the maturity date of the note, unless the U.S. Holder elects to accrue market
discount on a constant yield basis. Once made, such an election may be revoked
only with the consent of the IRS and, therefore, should only be made in
consultation with a tax advisor.
unt by which 90% of its gross income exceeds the amount qualifying
under the 95% gross income test), as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a
fraction intended to reflect our profitability;
(6) in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not
more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code to include specified entities);
To monitor
compliance with the share ownership requirements, ARC is generally required to
maintain records regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, ARC
must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant
percentages of its stock, in which the record holders are to disclose the
actual owners of the shares, i.e.,
the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by ARC. A
list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be
maintained as part of its records. Failure by ARC to comply with these record-keeping
requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. If ARC satisfies these
requirements and has no reason to know that condition (6) is not
satisfied, it will be deemed to have satisfied such condition. A stockholder
that fails or refuses to comply with the demand is required by Treasury
regulations to submit a statement with its tax return disclosing the actual
ownership of the shares and other information.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. A REIT, in general, may
jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned,
to treat the subsidiary corporation as a TRS. The separate existence of a TRS
or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed
above, is not ignored for
ARC and several of ARCs corporate subsidiaries, ARC
Dealership, Inc., Windstar Aviation Corp., ARC Insurance Services, Inc.,
ARC Management Services, Inc., ARC DAM Management, Inc., ARC TRS, Inc.,
Colonial Gardens Water, Inc., and ARCMS, Inc., have made an election
for those subsidiaries to be treated as a TRS for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. ARC may form additional TRSs in the future. To the extent that any
such TRSs pay any taxes, they will hav 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
The 10%
value test does not apply to certain straight debt and other excluded
securities, as described in the Internal Revenue Code, including but not
limited to any loan to an individual or an estate, any obligation to pay rents
from real property and any security issued by a REIT. In addition, (a) a
REITs interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security for
purposes of applying the 10% value test; (b) any debt instrument issued by
a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be
considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the
partnerships gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the
75% REIT gross income test; and (c) any debt instrument issued by a
partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be
considered a security issued by the partnership to the extent of the REITs
interest as a partner in the partnership.
168
i.e.
where the acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a
borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the stock is not
otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, distributions from ARC and
income from the sale of ARC stock generally should not give rise to UBTI to a
tax-exempt U.S. stockholder.
p;ARC would not
have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code provides that stock owned by such trusts shall be
treated, for purposes of the requirement that not more than 50% of the value of
the outstanding stock of a REIT is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or
fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain
entities) by the beneficiaries of such trusts. Certain restrictions on
ownership and transfer of ARCs stock should generally prevent a tax-exempt
entity from owning more than 10% of the value of ARC stock, or ARC from
becoming a pension-held REIT.
Total/Weighted Average
Prior to the Offering
and Offered Hereby
of Notes
Outstanding
Owned Prior to
the Offering
Common Outstanding
that May Be Sold(3)
="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;">
(5) FrontPoint
Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC is the general partner of FrontPoint
Convertible Arbitrage Fund, L.P. FrontPoint Partners LLC is the managing member
of FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC and as such has voting and
dispositive power over the securities held by the fund. Philip Duff, W.
Gillespie Caffray and Paul Ghaffari are members of the board of managers of
FrontPoint Partners LLC and are the sole members of the management committee.
Messrs. Duff, Caffray and Ghaffari and FrontPoint Partners LLC and
FrontPoint Convertible Arbitrage Fund GP, LLC each disclaim beneficial
ownership of the securities held by the fund except for their pecuniary
interest therein.
175
at varying prices determined
at the time of sale; or
F-3
and 2002
and 2004
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(In thousands)
1,813,232
-break-after:avoid;">
249
Evergreen Village
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
December 31
Net
consumer finance income
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
Partner
Partners
OP Unitholders
Total
69.0
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
<;">
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
255
Total/Weighted Average
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Lives (in Years)
Price
Allocation
KS
ace="Times New Roman" style="font-size:8.0pt;">(1) Total
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002, include non-recurring
charges incurred in the Reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt
including $1.9 million in exit fees and $1.6 million for the
write-off of unamortized loan costs, and include a charge of $13.6 million
to write-off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance
businesses.
Lease intangibles
Rental and other property
December 31,
Average
size:1.0pt;">
="2" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">NA
%
k-after:avoid;text-align:center;">Per Occupied
148
HTA
Feb-04
Feb-04
Total/Weighted Average
182
257
t-size:10.0pt;">Parkview Estates
126
D.A.M.
Total/Weighted Average
gn:right;">
<-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">
Morgantown, PA
Reading, PA
Jun-04
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Net capital
face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;">
Distributions
292
Senior
Revolving Credit Facility
Average
Preferred
unit distributions
argin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">
December 31,
December 31,
Community Name
December 31,
0pt;padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:34.0pt;">
In December 2004,
we entered into an agreement to sell our Sunswept, Berryhill Acres and
Berryhill Commons communities to an unaffiliated third party for a total sales
price of approximately $8.3 million. These sales also closed during the
fourth quarter of 2004.
Ended December 31,
13. Goodwill
Impairment
*
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MDTotal/Weighted Average
F-35
342
font-size:1.0pt;">
$
pt;">
="font-size:10.0pt;">644,114
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
2005
2004
81.3
Gainesville, Florida
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
June 30,
June 30,
2,082
/p>
)
4,080
.7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">
face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:1.0pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">
)
(41,783
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
June 30,
Hazleton, PennsylvaniaTotal/Weighted Average
align="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:6.25pt;">
Cash flow
from financing activities
xt-align:right;">(4,434
Net cash provided by financing activities
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Lives (Years)
Average
Average
Average
:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:100.65pt;">
Conway Plantation
Eagle Creek
Lakewood
t .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:10.2pt;">
style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:8.5pt;">
eak-after:avoid;">
="margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt 10.0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-indent:-10.0pt;">Mar-04
108
h="16" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:12.0pt;">
Jun-04
2005
2004
Less
accumulated depreciation
pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:20.45pt;">
1,532,780
2005
2004
June 30,
after:avoid;text-align:center;">Six Months Ended
June 30,
$
2.2pt;">
June 30,
June 30,
Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">1,429
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
Vice Chairman and Director
2005
2004
James R. Randy Staff
Total
Assets
June 30,
June 30,
communities,
respectively. In 2005 through June 30, we have not acquired any
communities.
Conflicts of Interest Policies
· the fact of the common directorship or interest is
disclosed or known to ARCs board of directors or a committee of its board, and
ARCs board or committee authorizes, approves or ratifies the transaction or
contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even
if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum;
the fact of the common directorship or interest is
disclosed or known to ARCs stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction
or contract is authorized, approved or ratified by a majority of the votes cast
by the stockholders entitled to vote (other than the votes of shares owned of
record or beneficially by the interested director or corporation or other
entity); or
June 30,
June 30,
of Units
of Units
Owned
Our partnership agreement expressly limits ARCs liability
by providing that ARC and its officers and directors are not liable or
accountable in damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for errors in
Holders may surrender their notes for exchange of shares of
ARC common stock at the applicable exchange rate at any time prior to the close
of business on the second business day immediately preceding the stated
maturity date.
on Effective
June 30,
June 30,
2.8500
2005
2004
yle="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt 0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">
130
· all rights of holders of
such notes will terminate except the right to receive the repurchase price.
REAL ESTATE AND RELATED DEPRECIATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
Subsequent to
Acquisition
at Close of Period
Improvements
Improvements
Improvements
Depreciation
Acquisition
· to add to our covenants for
the benefit of the holders of the notes or to surrender any right or power
conferred upon us;
Agreement between Us and ARC;
Book-Entry
System
DTC was
created to hold securities of institutions that have accounts with DTC (called
participants) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions among its participants in such securities through electronic
book-entry changes in accounts of the participants, thereby eliminating the
need for physical movement of securities certificates. DTCs participants
include securities brokers and dealers, which may include the initial
purchasers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Access to DTCs book-entry system is also available to others
such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (called, the indirect
participants) that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a
participant, whether directly or indirectly.
We expect
that DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any payment of principal of, premium,
if any, or interest (including liquidated damages) on the global security, will
credit participants accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their
respective beneficial interests in the principal amount of the global security
as shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. We also expect that payments by
participants or indirect participants to owners of beneficial interests in the
global security held through such participants or indirect participants will be
governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the
responsibility of such participants or indirect participants. We will not have
any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to, or
payments made on account of, beneficial interests in the global security for
any note or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to
such beneficial interests or for any other aspect of the relationship between
DTC and its participants or indirect participants or the relationship between
such participants or indirect participants and the owners of beneficial
interests in the global security owning through such participants.
If,
Rate
maturity
thousands)
le="font-size:1.0pt;">
>
Consumer
Finance Facility Due 2008
Within
20 days of receiving notice from ARC that shares of stock have been
transferred to the trust, the trustee of such trust shall sell such shares to a
person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the 7.3% or other
applicable limitations. Upon a sale of such shares by the trustee, the interest
of the charitable beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be
paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent of the lesser
of (1) such transferees original purchase price (or the original market
value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (2) the
price received by the trustee, and, second, to the charitable beneficiary, to
the extent of any sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the
original intended transferee. In addition, shares of stock held in such trust
are purchasable by ARC until the trustee has sold the shares at a price equal
to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by the original intended
transferee (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired
by gift or devise) and the market price for the stock on the date that ARC
determines to purchase the stock. Upon such sale to ARC, the interest of the
trust in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net
proceeds to the original intended transferee.
158
· It may be subject to the alternative
minimum tax on our items of tax preference, if any;
· If it fails to distribute during
each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of its REIT ordinary income
for such year, (b) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year
and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, or the required
distribution, it will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the
required distribution over the sum of (1) the amounts actually distributed
(taking into account excess distributions from prior years), plus (2) retained
amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level;
Gross
Income Tests
After
initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, ARC will not
lose its qualification as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the
end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If ARC
fails to satisfy the asset tests because it acquires securities during a
quarter, it can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying
assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. Commencing with its
taxable year beginning on January 1, 2005, if ARC fails the 5% asset test
or the 10% vote or value asset tests at the end of any quarter and such failure
is not cured within 30 days thereafter, it may dispose of sufficient
assets or otherwise come into compliance with such asset diversification
requirements (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in
which the identification of the failure to satisfy these asset tests occurred)
to cure such a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of its assets at
the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000. In addition, if ARC fails any
of the asset tests (including a failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests) in
excess of the de minimis amount
described above, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause and not
willful neglect, it is permitted to avoid disqualification as a REIT, after the
30 day cure period, by taking steps including the disposition of
sufficient assets to meet the asset test or otherwise coming into compliance
with such asset diversification requirements (generally within six months after
the last day of the quarter in which the identification of the failure to
satisfy the REIT asset test occurred) and paying a tax equal to the greater of
$50,000 or the highest corporate income tax rate (currently 35%) of the net
income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period in which it
failed to satisfy the asset test.
Distributions. Provided that ARC qualifies
as a REIT, distributions made to its taxable U.S. stockholders out of current
and accumulated earnings and profits, and not designated as capital gain
dividends, will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary dividend
income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for
corporations. In determining the extent to which a distribution with respect to
ARCs stock constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
earnings and profits will be allocated first to distributions with respect to
ARCs preferred stock, if any, and then to ARCs common stock. Dividends
received from REITs are generally not eligible to be taxed at the preferential
qualified dividend income rates applicable to individual U.S. stockholders who
receive dividends from taxable subchapter C corporations.
Prior to the Offering
and Offered Hereby
of Notes
Outstanding
Owned Prior to
the Offering
Common Outstanding
that May Be Sold(3)
979
524,109
Since
the date on which we were provided with the information regarding their notes,
selling securityholders may have acquired, sold, transferred or otherwise
disposed of all or a portion of their notes or the underlying shares of ARC
common stock for which the notes may be exchanged. Accordingly, the information
provided here for any particular securityholder may understate or overstate, as
the case may be, such securityholders current ownership. The aggregate
principal amount of notes outstanding as of the date of this registration
statement is $96,600,000, which is the aggregate principal amount of notes
registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part. Any such changed information will be set forth in supplements to this
registration statement if and when necessary.
Selling
securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or
other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of the
notes or the underlying ARC common stock and deliver these securities to close
out such short positions, or lend or pledge the notes or the ARC common stock
issuable upon exchange of the notes to broker-dealers that in turn may sell
these securities.
and 2002
and 2004
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(In thousands)
" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:46.5pt;">
;">
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
December 31
Estates
7" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:5.55pt;">
)
1,255
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
Partner
Partners
OP Unitholders
)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
1,678
1,847
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
(In thousands)
Net cash
provided by financing activities
2,000
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
With the proceeds from ARCs IPO and the financing
transaction, we acquired 87 manufactured home communities from Hometown
America, L.L.C. (Hometown). We acquired an additional three communities on April 9,
2004 upon the completion of the mortgage debt loan assumption process. The 90
acquired communities are located in 24 states and total 26,406 homesites. The
total purchase price for these communities and related assets was approximately
$615.3 million including assumed indebtedness with a fair value of
$93.1 million (See Note 3).
Lives (in Years)
ding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
Price
Allocation
In accordance with the procedures
described above, we have established the following intangible assets associated
with in-place leases and tenant relationships as of the date of acquisition (in
thousands):
(1) Total
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002, include non-recurring
charges incurred in the Reorganization in connection with the repayment of debt
including $1.9 million in exit fees and $1.6 million for the
write-off of unamortized loan costs, and include a charge of $13.6 million
to write-off goodwill associated with our retail home sales and insurance
businesses.
December 31,
Net loss attributable to common OP unitholders per unit
6,968
400
c;font-weight:bold;">
982
Kopper
View MHC
:center;">HTA
Beaches
1,066
e="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:29.65pt;">
t 0pt .0001pt;">
1,620
pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:center;">D.A.M.
Honey Brook, PA
Dec-97
font>
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Preferred
OP Units
Net capital
<">
2002
1,524
Common OP
Units
1,779
width="2" valign="bottom" style="padding:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:1.7pt;">
Douglasville, GA
December 31,
2,269
1,574
margin:0pt 0pt .0001pt;text-align:right;">
$
December 31,
Coach)
"font-size:10.0pt;">268
December 31,
7,148
181
$
Ended December 31,
Real Estate Asset Impairment
The Company provides to its employees a qualified
retirement savings plan (Plan) designed to qualify under Section 401 of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis
subject to certain maximum amounts. The Plan does not provide for matching
contributions to be made by the Company to employee accounts.
h:5.0pt;">
24,931
695
84,084
th:6.0pt;">
ter:avoid;text-align:right;">2,224
$
" face="Times New Roman" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Real estate
96
Corporate
and other
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
2005
2004
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
June 30,
June 30,422
" style="font-size:1.0pt;">
(42,578
505
(7,561
$
Goodlettsville, TN
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
June 30,
$
Brook
g:0pt .7pt 0pt 0pt;width:4.65pt;">
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Lives (Years)
3
)
Broadmore
Subsequent to
Acquisition
at Close of Period
Improvements
Land
Improvements
Improvements
Depreciation
Acquisition
< style="font-size:1.0pt;">
right" style="margin:0pt 10.0pt .0001pt 0pt;page-break-after:avoid;text-align:right;">670
1,294