Edgar Filing: SEITEL INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

SEI-2013.06.30-10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_______________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

_______________________________________________

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-10165

_______________________________________________

SEITEL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_______________________________________________



Delaware		76-0025431
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10811 S. Westview Circle Drive Building C, Suite 100 Houston, Texas		77043
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(713) 881-8900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_______________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ¨ No ý

(Explanatory Note: The registrant filed a registration statement on Form S-4 on June 19, 2013. Prior to the filing of such registration statement, the registrant was a voluntary filer and therefore not subject to the filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, during the preceding 12 months, the registrant has filed all reports that it would have been required to file by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 if the registrant was subject to the filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during such timeframe.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “ accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No ý

As of August 7, 2013, there were 100 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding, par value $.001 per share.

Table of Contents

INDEX




		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity (Unaudited)	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	32
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures	32
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings	33
	Item 1A. Risk Factors	33
	Item 6. Exhibits	33
	SIGNATURES	33

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)



	(Unaudited) June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,183		$	61,891
Receivables
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $332 and $737, respectively	35,195			61,195
Notes and other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $988	2,154			2,143
Due from Seitel Holdings, Inc.	1,125			874
Seismic data library, net of accumulated amortization of $928,346 and $889,804, respectively	190,467			180,117
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $13,989 and $13,461, respectively	4,364			4,818
Prepaid expenses, deferred charges and other	14,536			10,774
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $36,104 and $34,087, respectively	17,639			20,828
Goodwill	202,643			208,020
Deferred income taxes	84			84
TOTAL ASSETS	$	493,390		$	550,744
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	38,603		$	62,783
Income taxes payable	546			4,134
Debt
Senior Notes	250,000			275,000
Notes payable	—			29
Obligations under capital leases	2,831			3,113
Deferred revenue	45,691			52,857
Deferred income taxes	4,909			2,470
TOTAL LIABILITIES	342,580			400,386
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	399,270			398,772
Retained deficit	(264,029		)	(272,135		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	15,569			23,721
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	150,810			150,358
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	$	493,390		$	550,744

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

(In thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
REVENUE	$	47,544		$	46,028		$	98,895		$	118,575
EXPENSES:
Depreciation and amortization	27,829			29,837			57,167			69,221
Cost of sales	63			151			102			248
Selling, general and administrative	6,254			7,705			13,641			15,797
	34,146			37,693			70,910			85,266
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS	13,398			8,335			27,985			33,309
Interest expense, net	(6,138		)	(7,253		)	(15,453		)	(14,472		)
Foreign currency exchange losses	(1,171		)	(426		)	(1,818		)	(15		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			—			(1,504		)	—
Gain on sale of marketable securities	—			230			—			230
Other income	—			402			1			483
Income before income taxes	6,089			1,288			9,211			19,535
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	(279		)	18			1,105			3,559
NET INCOME	$	6,368		$	1,270		$	8,106		$	15,976

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)

(In thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income	$	6,368		$	1,270		$	8,106		$	15,976
Unrealized losses on securities held as available for sale, net of tax:
Unrealized net holding losses arising during the period	—			(117		)	—			(32		)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in earnings	—			(230		)	—			(230		)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(5,075		)	(2,895		)	(8,152		)	(339		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,293		$	(1,972	)	$	(46	)	$	15,375

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share amounts)



				Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
	Common Stock
	Shares	Amount
Balance, December 31, 2012	100	$	—	$	398,772	$	(272,135	)	$	23,721
Amortization of stock-based compensation costs	—	—		498		—			—
Net income	—	—		—		8,106			—
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—	—		—		—			(8,152		)
Balance, June 30, 2013	100	$	—	$	399,270	$	(264,029	)	$	15,569

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(In thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income	$	8,106		$	15,976
Depreciation and amortization	57,167			69,221
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	1,504			—
Deferred income tax provision	2,681			760
Foreign currency exchange losses	1,818			15
Amortization of deferred financing costs	739			997
Amortization of stock-based compensation	498			318
Amortization of favorable facility lease	—			142
Decrease in allowance for doubtful accounts	—			(313		)
Non-cash revenue	(766		)	(2,681		)
Gain on sale of marketable securities	—			(230		)
Decrease in receivables	25,637			13,804
Decrease (increase) in other assets	(3,744		)	236
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue	(6,787		)	2,100
Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities	(12,579		)	(1,829		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	74,274			98,516
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash invested in seismic data	(77,931		)	(113,136		)
Cash paid to acquire property, equipment and other	(602		)	(1,074		)
Net proceeds from sale of marketable securities	—			230
Cash from sale of property, equipment and other	59			90
Advances to Seitel Holdings, Inc.	(251		)	(9		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(78,725		)	(113,899		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of 9½% Senior Notes	250,000			—
Repayment of 9.75% Senior Notes	(275,000		)	—
Principal payments on notes payable	(29		)	(32		)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations	(124		)	(91		)
Costs of debt transactions	(6,842		)	—
Net cash used in financing activities	(31,995		)	(123		)
Effect of exchange rate changes	(262		)	187
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(36,708		)	(15,319		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	61,891			74,894
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	25,183		$	59,575
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	18,331		$	13,539
Income taxes, net of refunds received	$	6,149		$	1,894
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Additions to seismic data library	$	2,977		$	2,389
Capital lease obligations incurred	$	—		$	94

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SEITEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

June 30, 2013

NOTE A-BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Seitel, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain reclassifications have been made to the amounts in the prior year's financial statements to conform to the current year's presentation. In preparing the Company’s financial statements, a number of estimates and assumptions are made by management that affect the accounting for and recognition of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other quarter of 2013 or for the year ending December 31, 2013. The condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited balance sheet of the Company as of that date. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

NOTE B-REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue from Data Acquisition

The Company generates revenue when it creates a new seismic survey that is initially licensed by one or more of its customers to use the resulting data. The payments for the initial licenses are sometimes referred to as underwriting or prefunding. Customers make periodic payments throughout the creation period, which generally correspond to costs incurred and work performed. These payments are non-refundable. The Company considers the contracts signed up to the time the Company makes a firm commitment to create the new seismic survey as underwriting. Any subsequent licensing of the data while it is in progress is considered a resale license (see “Revenue from Non-Exclusive Data Licenses”).

Underwriting revenue is recognized throughout the creation period using the proportional performance method based upon costs incurred and work performed to date as a percentage of total estimated costs and work required. Management believes that this method is the most reliable and representative measure of progress for its data creation projects. On average, the duration of the data creation process is approximately one year. Under these contracts, the Company creates new seismic data designed in conjunction with its customers and specifically suited to the geology of the area using the most appropriate technology available.

The Company outsources the substantial majority of the work required to complete data acquisition projects to third party contractors. The Company’s payments to these third party contractors comprise the substantial majority of the total estimated costs of the project and are paid throughout the creation period. A typical survey includes specific activities required to complete the survey, each of which has value to the customers. Typical activities, that often occur concurrently, include:


•	permitting for land access, mineral rights, and regulatory approval;


•	surveying;


•	drilling for the placement of energy sources;


•	recording the data in the field; and


•	processing the data.

The customers paying for the initial licenses receive legally enforceable rights to any resulting product of each activity described above. The customers also receive access to and use of the newly acquired, processed data.

The customers’ access to and use of the results of the work performed and of the newly acquired, processed data is governed by a license agreement, which is a separate agreement from the acquisition contract. The Company’s acquisition contracts require the customer either to have a license agreement in place or to execute one at the time the acquisition contract is signed. The Company maintains sole ownership of the newly acquired data, which is added to its library, and is free to license the data to other customers.

Table of Contents

Revenue from Non-Exclusive Data Licenses

The Company recognizes a substantial portion of its revenue from licensing of data once it is available for delivery. These are sometimes referred to as resale licensing revenue, late sales or shelf sales.

These sales fall under the following four basic forms of non-exclusive license contracts.


•	Specific license contract—The customer licenses and selects data from the data library, including data currently in progress, at the time the contract is entered into and holds this license for a long-term period.


•	Library card license contract—The customer initially receives only access to data. The customer may then select specific data, from the collection of data to which it has access, to hold long-term under its license agreement. The length of the selection periods under the library card contracts is limited in time and varies from customer to customer.


•	Review and possession license contract—The customer obtains the right to review a certain quantity of data for a limited period of time. During the review period, the customer may select specific data from that available for review to hold long-term under its license agreement. Any data not selected for long-term licensing must be returned to the Company at the end of the review period.


•	Review only license contract—The customer obtains rights to review a certain quantity of data for a limited period of time, but does not obtain the right to select specific data to hold long-term.

The Company’s non-exclusive license contracts specify the following:


•	that all customers must also execute a master license agreement that governs the use of all data received under the Company’s non-exclusive license contracts;


•	the specific payment terms, generally ranging from 30 days to 12 months, and that such payments are non-cancelable and non-refundable;


•	the actual data that is accessible to the customer; and


•	that the data is licensed in its present form, where is and as is, and the Company is under no obligation to make any enhancements, modifications or additions to the data unless specific terms to the contrary are included.

Revenue from the non-exclusive licensing of seismic data is recognized when the following criteria are met:


•	the Company has an arrangement with the customer that is validated by a signed contract;


•	the sales price is fixed and determinable;


•	collection is reasonably assured;


•	the customer has selected the specific data or the contract has expired without full selection;


•	the data is currently available for delivery; and


•	the license term has begun.

Copies of the data are available to the customer immediately upon request.

For licenses that have been invoiced for which payment is due or has been received, but have not met the aforementioned criteria, the revenue is deferred along with the related direct costs (primarily consisting of sales commissions). This normally occurs under the library card, review and possession or review only license contracts because the data selection may occur over time. Additionally, if the contract allows licensing of data that is not currently available or enhancements, modifications or additions to the data are required per the contract, revenue is deferred until such time that the data is available.

Revenue from Non-Monetary Exchanges

In certain cases, the Company will take ownership of a customer’s seismic data or revenue interest (collectively referred to as “data”) in exchange for a non-exclusive license to selected seismic data from the Company’s library and, in some cases, services provided by Seitel Solutions (“Solutions”). In connection with specific data acquisition contracts, the Company may choose to receive both cash and ownership of seismic data from the customer as consideration for the underwriting of new data acquisition. In addition, the Company may receive advanced data processing services on selected existing data in exchange for

Table of Contents

a non-exclusive license to selected data from the Company’s library. These exchanges are referred to as non-monetary exchanges. A non-monetary exchange for data always complies with the following criteria:


•	the data license delivered is always distinct from the data received;


•	the customer forfeits ownership of its data; and


•	the Company retains ownership in its data.

In non-monetary exchange transactions, the Company records a data library asset for the seismic data received or processed at the time the contract is entered into or the data is completed, as applicable, and recognizes revenue on the transaction in equal value in accordance with its policy on revenue from data licenses, which is, when the data is selected by the customer, or revenue from data acquisition, as applicable, or as services are provided by Solutions. The data license to the customer is in the form of one of the four basic forms of contracts discussed above. These transactions are valued at the fair value of the data received or delivered, whichever is more readily determinable.

Fair value of the data exchanged is determined using a multi-step process as follows:

•

First, the Company considers the value of the data or services received from the customer. In determining the value of the data received, the Company considers the age, quality, current demand and future marketability of the data and, in the case of 3D seismic data, the cost that would be required to create the data. In addition, the Company applies a limitation on the value it assigns per square mile on the data received. In determining the value of the services received, the Company considers the cost of such similar services that it could obtain from a third party provider.


•	Second, the Company determines the value of the license granted to the customer. Typically, the range of cash transactions by the Company for licenses of similar data during the prior six months are evaluated. In evaluating the range of cash transactions, the Company does not consider transactions that are disproportionately high or low.

Due to the Company’s revenue recognition policies, revenue recognized on non-monetary exchange transactions may not occur at the same time the seismic data acquired is recorded as an asset. The activity related to non-monetary exchanges was as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Seismic data library additions	$	261	$	1,680	$	2,977	$	2,389
Revenue recognized on specific data licenses or selections of data	104		206		682		1,033
Revenue recognized related to acquisition contracts	27		360		84		1,628
Revenue recognized related to Solutions	—		—		—		20

Revenue from Solutions

Revenue from Solutions is recognized as the services for reproduction and delivery of seismic data are provided to customers.

NOTE C-SEISMIC DATA LIBRARY

The Company’s seismic data library consists of seismic surveys that are offered for license to customers on a non-exclusive basis. Costs associated with creating, acquiring or purchasing the seismic data library are capitalized and amortized principally on the income forecast method subject to a straight-line amortization period of four years, applied on a quarterly basis at the individual survey level.

Costs of Seismic Data Library

For purchased seismic data, the Company capitalizes the purchase price of the acquired data.

For data received through a non-monetary exchange, the Company capitalizes an amount equal to the fair value of the data received by the Company or the fair value of the license granted to the customer, whichever is more readily determinable. See Note B – “Revenue Recognition – Revenue from Non-Monetary Exchanges” for discussion of the process used to determine fair value.

For newly created data, the capitalized costs include costs paid to third parties for the acquisition of data and related permitting, surveying and other activities associated with the data creation activity. In addition, the Company capitalizes certain internal

Table of Contents

costs related to processing the created data. Such costs include salaries and benefits of the Company’s processing personnel and certain other costs incurred for the benefit of the processing activity. The Company believes that the internal processing costs capitalized are not greater than, and generally are less than, those that would be incurred and capitalized if such activity were performed by a third party. Capitalized costs for internal data processing were $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $1.8 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Data Library Amortization

The Company amortizes its seismic data library investment using the greater of the amortization that would result from the application of the income forecast method subject to a minimum amortization rate or a straight-line basis over the useful life of the data. With respect to each survey in the data library, the straight-line policy is applied from the time such survey is available for licensing to customers on a non-exclusive basis.

The Company applies the income forecast method by forecasting the ultimate revenue expected to be derived from a particular data library component over the estimated useful life of each survey comprising part of such component. This forecast is made by the Company annually and reviewed quarterly. If, during any such review, the Company determines that the ultimate revenue for a library component is expected to be significantly different than the original estimate of total revenue for such library component, the Company revises the amortization rate attributable to future revenue from each survey in such component. The lowest amortization rate the Company applies using the income forecast method is 70%. In addition, in connection with the forecast reviews and updates, the Company evaluates the recoverability of its seismic data library investment, and if required, records an impairment charge with respect to such investment. See discussion on “Seismic Data Library Impairment” below.

The actual aggregate rate of amortization depends on the specific seismic surveys licensed and selected by the Company’s customers during the period and the amount of straight-line amortization recorded. The income forecast amortization rates can vary by component and, as of July 1, 2013, is 70% for all components. For those seismic surveys which have been fully amortized, no amortization expense is required on revenue recorded.

The greater of the income forecast or straight-line amortization policy is applied quarterly on a cumulative basis at the individual survey level. Under this policy, the Company first records amortization using the income forecast method. The cumulative amortization recorded for each survey is then compared with the cumulative straight-line amortization. If the cumulative straight-line amortization is higher for any specific survey, additional amortization expense is recorded, resulting in accumulated amortization being equal to the cumulative straight-line amortization for such survey. This requirement is applied regardless of future-year revenue estimates for the library component of which the survey is a part and does not consider the existence of deferred revenue with respect to the library component or to any survey.

Seismic Data Library Impairment

The Company evaluates its seismic data library investment by grouping individual surveys into components based on its operations and geological and geographical trends, resulting in the following data library segments for purposes of evaluating impairments: (I) North America 3D onshore comprised of the following components: (a) Texas Gulf Coast, (b) Eastern Texas, (c) Southern Louisiana/Mississippi, (d) Northern Louisiana, (e) Rocky Mountains, (f) Utica/Marcellus in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, (g) Panhandle Plays in North Texas/Oklahoma, (h) other United States, (i) Montney in British Columbia and Alberta, (j) Horn River in British Columbia, (k) Cardium in Alberta and (l) other Canada; (II) United States 2D; (III) Canada 2D; (IV) Gulf of Mexico offshore; and (V) international data outside North America. The Company believes that these library components constitute the lowest levels of independently identifiable cash flows.

The Company evaluates its seismic data library investment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company considers the level of sales performance in each component compared to projected sales, as well as industry conditions, among others, to be key factors in determining when its seismic data investment should be evaluated for impairment. In evaluating sales performance of each component, the Company generally considers five consecutive quarters of actual performance below forecasted sales to be an indicator of potential impairment.

The impairment evaluation is based first on a comparison of the undiscounted future cash flows over each component’s remaining estimated useful life with the carrying value of each library component. If the undiscounted cash flows are equal to or greater than the carrying value of such component, no impairment is recorded. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of any component, the forecast of future cash flows related to such component is discounted to fair value and compared with such component’s carrying amount. The difference between the library component’s carrying amount and the discounted future value of the expected revenue stream is recorded as an impairment charge.

Table of Contents

For purposes of evaluating potential impairment losses, the Company estimates the future cash flows attributable to a library component by evaluating, among other factors, historical and recent revenue trends, oil and gas prospectivity in particular regions, general economic conditions affecting its customer base and expected changes in technology and other factors that the Company deems relevant. The cash flow estimates exclude expected future revenues attributable to non-monetary data exchanges and future data creation projects.

The estimation of future cash flows and fair value is highly subjective and inherently imprecise. Estimates can change materially from period to period based on many factors, including those described in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, if conditions change in the future, the Company may record impairment losses relative to its seismic data library investment, which could be material to any particular reporting period.

The Company did not have any impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

NOTE D-DEBT

The following is a summary of the Company’s debt (in thousands):



	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
9½% Senior Notes	$	250,000	$	—
9.75% Senior Notes	—		275,000
Credit Facility	—		—
Notes payable	—		29
	$	250,000	$	275,029

9½% Senior Unsecured Notes: On March 20, 2013, the Company issued, in a private placement, $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% senior notes (the “9½% Senior Notes”). The proceeds from the issuance of the 9½% Senior Notes, together with $29.8 million cash on hand, were used to satisfy and discharge the 9.75% senior notes due 2014 (the “9.75% Senior Notes”), including accrued interest of $4.8 million. The 9½% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2019. Interest is payable in cash, semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2013. The 9½% Senior Notes are unsecured and are jointly and severally guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's significant domestic subsidiaries on a senior basis. The 9½% Senior Notes contain restrictive covenants which limit the Company's ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends and make other restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, and complete mergers, acquisitions and sales of assets.

As required by their terms, in July 2013, the Company commenced an offer to exchange the 9½% Senior Notes for senior notes of like amounts and terms (such notes also referred to herein as the 9½% Senior Notes) in a publicly registered exchange offer. The exchange offer will conclude on August 15, 2013, unless extended.

From time to time on or before April 15, 2016, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9½% Senior Notes with the net proceeds of equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 109.50% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon a change of control (as defined in the indenture), each holder of the 9½% Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to offer to purchase all of such holder's notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

9.75% Senior Unsecured Notes: The Company had $275.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.75% Senior Notes outstanding until these notes were satisfied and discharged in connection with the issuance of the 9½% Senior Notes. On March 20, 2013, the noteholders were issued a notice of redemption and the 9.75% Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest through April 18, 2013. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the indenture governing the 9.75% Senior Notes, this payment satisfied and discharged the entire indebtedness under the 9.75% Senior Notes. Accordingly, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million, which included the write-off of unamortized issue expenses, for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Credit Facility: On May 25, 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (the “U.S. Lender”) and Wells Fargo Capital Finance Corporation Canada (the “Canadian Lender,” and collectively with the U.S. Lender, the “Lenders”). The Credit Facility provides a $30.0 million revolving credit facility with a Canadian sublimit of $5.0 million, subject to borrowing base limitations based on the Company's seismic data assets and eligible accounts receivable, each as defined in the Credit Facility, calculated on a monthly basis. The Credit Facility expires on May 25, 2016. Each existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the

Table of Contents

“U.S. Guarantors”) is a guarantor of payment of the U.S. obligations under the Credit Facility, and Olympic Seismic Ltd. (“Olympic”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and each future direct and indirect wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of the Company (such subsidiaries together with Olympic, the “Canadian Guarantors”) are guarantors of payment of the Canadian obligations under the Credit Facility.

The borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by a perfected first priority lien and security interest (subject to certain exceptions) in favor of the U.S. Lender in all present and future assets and equity of the Company and each U.S. Guarantor and 65% of the equity in Olympic, and borrowings by Olympic are secured by a perfected first priority lien and security interest (subject to certain exceptions) in favor of the Canadian Lender in all present and future assets of each Canadian Guarantor. U.S. borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") rate plus 3.50% or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus ½ of 1%, (ii) the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1% and (iii) the prime rate of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, plus 2.50%. Canadian borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest based on a Canadian base rate, as defined in the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and requires that the Company maintain minimum excess availability (as defined in the Credit Facility) of $10.0 million or, if such excess availability is not maintained, then the Company's fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) may not be less than 1.00 to 1.00. In addition, the Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants, representations and warranties, borrowing conditions, events of default and remedies for the Lenders. The aggregate loan or any individual loan made under the Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time subject to certain restrictions. The Credit Facility is also subject to the payment of upfront, letter of credit, administrative and certain other fees. As of June 30, 2013, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility and there was $20.0 million of availability.

NOTE E-FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Authoritative guidance on fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value, giving the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).

The Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In measuring the fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, market data or assumptions are used that the Company believes market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk when appropriate. The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following (in thousands):



			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
At June 30, 2013:
Cash equivalents	$	24,774	$	24,774	$	—	$	—
At December 31, 2012:
Cash equivalents	$	61,272	$	61,272	$	—	$	—

The Company had no transfers of assets between any of the above levels during the six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

Cash equivalents include money market funds that invest in United States government obligations and a Canadian dollar investment account, all with original maturities of three months or less. The original costs of these assets approximate fair value due to their short-term maturity.

Other Financial Instruments:

Debt – At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying value of the Company's debt was approximately $250.0 million and $275.0 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the debt was approximately $250.0 million at June 30, 2013 and $274.6 million at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the Company's senior notes is based on quoted market prices (Level 1 inputs).

Table of Contents

NOTE F-STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include $651,000 of restricted cash related to collateral on seismic operations bonds. The balances at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 also include $125,000 (Canadian) of restricted cash posted as security against Company issued credit cards for Olympic.

The Company had non-cash additions to its seismic data library comprised of the following for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Non-monetary exchanges related to resale licensing revenue	$	585	$	709
Non-monetary exchanges from underwriting of new data acquisition	—		1,680
Completion of data in progress from prior non-monetary exchanges	2,392		—
Total non-cash additions to seismic data library	$	2,977	$	2,389

Non-cash revenue consisted of the following for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Acquisition revenue on underwriting from non-monetary exchange contracts	$	84	$	1,628
Licensing revenue from specific data licenses and selections on non-monetary exchange contracts	682		1,033
Solutions revenue recognized from non-monetary exchange contracts	—		20
Total non-cash revenue	$	766	$	2,681

NOTE G-COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is involved from time to time in ordinary, routine claims and lawsuits incidental to its business. In the opinion of management, uninsured losses, if any, resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters should not be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, it is not possible to predict or determine the outcomes of the legal actions brought against it or by it, or to provide an estimate of all additional losses, if any, that may arise. At June 30, 2013, the Company has recorded the estimated amount of potential exposure it may have with respect to litigation and claims. Such amounts are not material to the financial statements.

NOTE H-RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The ASU was issued to eliminate diversity in practice in the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. Under the new guidance, an entity should present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of the deferred tax asset for an NOL or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward rather than as a liability when the uncertain tax position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date, but retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2013-11, but does not expect the standard to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

NOTE I-SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTORS CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

On March 20, 2013, the Company completed a private placement of 9½% Senior Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million. The Company’s payment obligations under the 9½% Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's significant 100% owned U.S. subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). All subsidiaries of the Company that do not guarantee the 9½% Senior Notes are referred to as Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries.

The indenture governing the 9½% Senior Notes provides that the guarantees by the Guarantor Subsidiaries will be released in the following customary circumstances: (i) upon a sale or other disposition, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, of

Table of Contents

the equity interests of that guarantor to a person that is not the Company or a restricted subsidiary of the Company; (ii) the guarantor sells all or substantially all of its assets to a person that is not the Company or a restricted subsidiary of the Company; (iii) the guarantor is properly designated as an unrestricted subsidiary or ceases to be a restricted subsidiary; (iv) upon legal defeasance of the 9½% Senior Notes or satisfaction and discharge of the indenture governing the 9½% Senior Notes; (v) the guarantor becomes an immaterial subsidiary or (vi) the guarantor is released from its guarantee obligations under the Credit Facility.

The consolidating condensed financial statements are presented below and should be read in connection with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. Separate financial statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because (i) the Guarantor Subsidiaries are wholly-owned and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 9½% Senior Notes on a joint and several basis and (ii) the Company’s management has determined such separate financial statements are not material to investors.

The following consolidating condensed financial information presents the consolidating condensed balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the consolidating condensed statements of income (loss), statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 of (a) the Company; (b) the Guarantor Subsidiaries; (c) the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries; (d) elimination entries; and (e) the Company, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, intercompany balances, intercompany transactions and intercompany sales.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

As of June 30, 2013

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	22,901		$	2,282		$	—		$	25,183
Receivables
Trade, net	—			29,977			5,218			—			35,195
Notes and other, net	—			5			2,149			—			2,154
Due from Seitel Holdings, Inc.	—			1,125			—			—			1,125
Intercompany receivables (payables)	27,301			750			(28,051		)	—			—
Investment in subsidiaries	356,436			432,028			1,593			(790,057		)	—
Net seismic data library	—			112,581			77,886			—			190,467
Net property and equipment	—			1,863			2,501			—			4,364
Prepaid expenses, deferred charges and other	7,448			2,430			4,658			—			14,536
Intangible assets, net	900			11,644			5,095			—			17,639
Goodwill	—			107,688			94,955			—			202,643
Deferred income taxes	—			84			—			—			84
TOTAL ASSETS	$	392,085		$	723,076		$	168,286		$	(790,057	)	$	493,390
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	6,658		$	25,647		$	6,298		$	—		$	38,603
Income taxes payable	186			360			—			—			546
Senior Notes	250,000			—			—			—			250,000
Obligations under capital leases	—			66			2,765			—			2,831
Deferred revenue	—			41,649			4,042			—			45,691
Deferred income taxes	—			—			4,909			—			4,909
TOTAL LIABILITIES	256,844			67,722			18,014			—			342,580
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Common stock	—			—			—			—			—
Additional paid-in capital	399,270			—			—			—			399,270
Parent investment	—			764,752			156,918			(921,670		)	—
Retained deficit	(264,029		)	(109,398		)	(22,215		)	131,613			(264,029		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			15,569			—			15,569
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	135,241			655,354			150,272			(790,057		)	150,810
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	$	392,085		$	723,076		$	168,286		$	(790,057	)	$	493,390

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

As of December 31, 2012

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	60,533		$	1,358		$	—		$	61,891
Receivables
Trade, net	—			43,806			17,389			—			61,195
Notes and other, net	—			9			2,134			—			2,143
Due from Seitel Holdings, Inc.	—			874			—			—			874
Intercompany receivables (payables)	75,688			(49,827		)	(25,861		)	—			—
Investment in subsidiaries	332,819			432,870			1,590			(767,279		)	—
Net seismic data library	—			100,087			80,030			—			180,117
Net property and equipment	—			2,125			2,693			—			4,818
Prepaid expenses, deferred charges and other	2,644			5,122			3,008			—			10,774
Intangible assets, net	900			13,250			6,678			—			20,828
Goodwill	—			107,688			100,332			—			208,020
Deferred income taxes	—			84			—			—			84
TOTAL ASSETS	$	412,051		$	716,621		$	189,351		$	(767,279	)	$	550,744
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	10,049		$	38,179		$	14,555		$	—		$	62,783
Income taxes payable	336			900			2,898			—			4,134
Senior Notes	275,000			—			—			—			275,000
Notes payable	29			—			—			—			29
Obligations under capital leases	—			81			3,032			—			3,113
Deferred revenue	—			45,320			7,537			—			52,857
Deferred income taxes	—			—			2,470			—			2,470
TOTAL LIABILITIES	285,414			84,480			30,492			—			400,386
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Common stock	—			—			—			—			—
Additional paid-in capital	398,772			—			—			—			398,772
Parent investment	—			764,752			156,918			(921,670		)	—
Retained deficit	(272,135		)	(132,611		)	(21,780		)	154,391			(272,135		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			23,721			—			23,721
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	126,637			632,141			158,859			(767,279		)	150,358
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY	$	412,051		$	716,621		$	189,351		$	(767,279	)	$	550,744

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
REVENUE	$	—		$	76,424		$	23,124		$	(653	)	$	98,895
EXPENSES:
Depreciation and amortization	—			41,352			15,815			—			57,167
Cost of sales	—			100			2			—			102
Selling, general and administrative	714			8,660			4,920			(653		)	13,641
	714			50,112			20,737			(653		)	70,910
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS	(714		)	26,312			2,387			—			27,985
Interest expense, net	(12,889		)	(1,714		)	(850		)	—			(15,453		)
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)	—			1			(1,819		)	—			(1,818		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(1,504		)	—			—			—			(1,504		)
Other income	—			1			—			—			1
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries	(15,107		)	24,600			(282		)	—			9,211
Provision for income taxes	—			952			153			—			1,105
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries	23,213			(435		)	—			(22,778		)	—
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	8,106		$	23,213		$	(435	)	$	(22,778	)	$	8,106

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)



	Parent		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Net income (loss)	$	8,106	$	23,213	$	(435	)	$	(22,778	)	$	8,106
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—		—		(8,152		)	—			(8,152		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	8,106	$	23,213	$	(8,587	)	$	(22,778	)	$	(46	)

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
REVENUE	$	—		$	70,421		$	48,836		$	(682	)	$	118,575
EXPENSES:
Depreciation and amortization	—			40,248			28,973			—			69,221
Cost of sales	—			235			13			—			248
Selling, general and administrative	1,174			9,306			5,999			(682		)	15,797
	1,174			49,789			34,985			(682		)	85,266
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS	(1,174		)	20,632			13,851			—			33,309
Interest expense, net	(5,374		)	(8,464		)	(634		)	—			(14,472		)
Foreign currency exchange losses	—			(4		)	(11		)	—			(15		)
Gain on sale of marketable securities	—			230			—			—			230
Other income	1			482			—			—			483
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in income of subsidiaries	(6,547		)	12,876			13,206			—			19,535
Provision for income taxes	—			88			3,471			—			3,559
Equity in income of subsidiaries	22,523			9,735			—			(32,258		)	—
NET INCOME	$	15,976		$	22,523		$	9,735		$	(32,258	)	$	15,976

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)



	Parent		Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Net income	$	15,976	$	22,523		$	9,735		$	(32,258	)	$	15,976
Unrealized losses on securities held as available for sale, net of tax:
Unrealized net holding losses arising during the period	—		(32		)	—			—			(32		)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in earnings	—		(230		)	—			—			(230		)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—		—			(339		)	—			(339		)
Comprehensive income	$	15,976	$	22,261		$	9,396		$	(32,258	)	$	15,375

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations		Consolidated Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(18,349	)	$	71,943		$	20,680		$	—	$	74,274
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash invested in seismic data	—			(57,916		)	(20,015		)	—		(77,931		)
Cash paid to acquire property, equipment and other	—			(383		)	(219		)	—		(602		)
Cash from sale of property, equipment and other	—			59			—			—		59
Advances to Seitel Holdings, Inc.	—			(251		)	—			—		(251		)
Net cash used in investing activities	—			(58,491		)	(20,234		)	—		(78,725		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of 9½% Senior Notes	250,000			—			—			—		250,000
Repayment of 9.75% Senior Notes	(275,000		)	—			—			—		(275,000		)
Principal payments on notes payable	(29		)	—			—			—		(29		)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations	—			(15		)	(109		)	—		(124		)
Costs of debt transactions	(6,842		)	—			—			—		(6,842		)
Intercompany transfers	50,220			(51,070		)	850			—		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	18,349			(51,085		)	741			—		(31,995		)
Effect of exchange rate changes	—			1			(263		)	—		(262		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	—			(37,632		)	924			—		(36,708		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	—			60,533			1,358			—		61,891
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	22,901		$	2,282		$	—	$	25,183

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)



	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidating Eliminations		Consolidated Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(14,316	)	$	63,287		$	49,545		$	—	$	98,516
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash invested in seismic data	—			(46,190		)	(66,946		)	—		(113,136		)
Cash paid to acquire property, equipment and other	—			(1,004		)	(70		)	—		(1,074		)
Net proceeds from sale of marketable securities	—			230			—			—		230
Cash from sale of property, equipment and other	—			90			—			—		90
Advances to Seitel Holdings, Inc.	—			(9		)	—			—		(9		)
Net cash used in investing activities	—			(46,883		)	(67,016		)	—		(113,899		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on notes payable	(32		)	—			—			—		(32		)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations	—			—			(91		)	—		(91		)
Intercompany transfers	14,348			(20,048		)	5,700			—		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	14,316			(20,048		)	5,609			—		(123		)
Effect of exchange rate changes	—			(4		)	191			—		187
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	—			(3,648		)	(11,671		)	—		(15,319		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	—			61,612			13,282			—		74,894
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	57,964		$	1,611		$	—	$	59,575

Table of Contents


Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements contained in this report about our future outlook, prospects, strategies and plans, and about industry conditions, demand for seismic services and the future economic life of our seismic data are forward-looking, among others. All statements that express belief, expectation, estimates or intentions, as well as those that are not statements of historical fact, are forward-looking. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “propose,” “plan,” “target,” “foresee,” “should,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements represent our present belief and are based on our current expectations and assumptions with respect to future events and their potential effect on us. While we believe our expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they involve risks and uncertainties beyond our control that could cause the actual results or outcome to differ materially from the expected results or outcome reflected in our forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Quarterly Report may not occur. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, actual customer demand for our seismic data and related services, the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices for natural gas, crude oil and condensate and natural gas liquids, conditions in the capital markets during the periods covered by the forward-looking statements, the effect of economic conditions, our ability to obtain financing on satisfactory terms if internally generated funds and our current credit facility are insufficient to fund our capital needs, the impact on our financial condition as a result of our debt and our debt service, our ability to obtain and maintain normal terms with our vendors and service providers, our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations, changes in the oil and gas industry or the economy generally and changes in the exploration budgets of our customers, as well as the risk factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date hereof and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Except as required by federal and state securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or any other reason. All forward-looking statements attributable to Seitel, Inc. or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to herein, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC and in our future periodic reports filed with the SEC.

Overview

General

We are a leading provider of onshore seismic data to the oil and gas industry in North America. We own an extensive library of onshore and offshore seismic data that we have accumulated since our inception in 1982 that we offer for license to exploration and production (“E&P”) companies. We believe our data library is the largest onshore three-dimensional (“3D”) database available for licensing in North America and includes leading positions in oil and liquids-rich unconventional plays.

Our products and services are used by E&P companies to assist in oil and gas exploration and development of hydrocarbon reserves. Historically, seismic data was tied to exploration capital expenditures as E&P companies used seismic data to increase the success rate of discovering hydrocarbon deposits. With the shift to unconventional plays, E&P companies now use seismic data as a development tool to better identify efficient drilling plans and maximize production by identifying and understanding a series of critical characteristics of the targeted resource. We generate revenue primarily by licensing data from our data library and from new data creation products, which are substantially underwritten or paid for by our clients. By participating in underwritten, nonexclusive surveys or purchasing licenses to existing data, E&P companies can obtain access to surveys at reduced costs as compared to acquiring seismic data on a proprietary basis.

Our primary areas of focus are onshore United States and Canada and, to a lesser extent, offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico. These markets continue to experience major changes. Major integrated oil and gas companies and national oil companies have become more active in the North American market, primarily in the unconventional plays, through joint ventures, asset purchases and corporate transactions. The larger independent oil and gas companies continue to be responsible for a significant

Table of Contents

portion of current U.S. drilling activity. Our offshore seismic data is primarily located in the shallow waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and generates a small percentage of our revenue.

Principal Factors Affecting Our Business

Our business is dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. The following are those that we consider to be principal factors affecting our business.

Demand for Seismic Data: Demand for our products and services is cyclical due to the nature of the oil and gas industry. In particular, demand for our seismic data services depends upon exploration, production, development and field management spending by E&P companies and, in the case of new data creation, the willingness of these companies to forgo ownership in the seismic data. Capital expenditures by E&P companies depend upon several factors, including actual and forecasted oil and natural gas commodity prices, prospect availability and the companies’ own short-term and strategic plans. These capital expenditures may also be affected by worldwide economic or industry-wide conditions. With the shift to unconventional plays, seismic data is increasingly tied to relatively stable development capital expenditures.

Merger and Acquisition/Joint Venture Activity: Merger and acquisition activity continues to occur within our client base. This activity could have a negative impact on seismic companies that operate in markets with a limited number of participating clients. However, we believe that, over time, this activity could have a positive impact on our business, as it should generate re-licensing fees, result in increased vitality in the trading of mineral interests and result in the creation of new independent customers through the rationalization of staff within those companies affected by this activity.

Exploiting unconventional plays is a capital intensive endeavor and many technically proficient E&P companies remain capital constrained. They find themselves needing to sell their positions to, or create partnerships with, large well-capitalized companies in order to develop their recoverable resource base. These joint venture partners or new owners will often need to purchase licenses to our seismic data for their own use.

North America Drilling Activity: Drilling activity has shifted to areas with oil and liquids-rich hydrocarbons, such as the Eagle Ford/Woodbine, Niobrara/Bakken and Utica/Marcellus in the U.S. and Montney and Cardium in Canada, with several emerging plays, including the Granite Wash (Panhandle Plays), Sussex, Mowry and Point Pleasant in the U.S. and Duvernay in Canada. Horizontal drilling rigs in oil and liquids-rich areas have leveled off, while activity in dry gas areas continues to be depressed.

Availability of Capital for Our Customers: Some of our customers are independent E&P companies and private prospect-generating companies that rely primarily on private capital markets to fund their exploration, production, development and field management activities. Reductions in cash flows resulting from lower commodity prices, along with the reduced availability of credit and increased costs of borrowing, could have a material impact on the ability of such companies to obtain funding necessary to purchase our seismic data.

Government Regulation: Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, provincial, state, foreign and local laws and regulations, including environmental and health and safety laws. We invest financial and managerial resources to comply with these laws and related permit requirements. Modification of existing laws or regulations and the adoption of new laws or regulations limiting or increasing exploration or production activities by oil and gas companies may have a material effect on our business operations.

Key Performance Measures

Management considers certain performance measures in evaluating and managing our financial condition and operating performance at various times and from time to time. Some of these performance measures are non-GAAP financial measures. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are not in accordance with, nor are they a substitute for, GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are intended to supplement our presentation of our financial results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following are the key performance measures considered by management.

Cash Resales: Cash resales represent new contracts for data licenses from our library, including data currently in progress, payable in cash. We believe this measure is important in assessing overall industry and client activity. Cash resales are likely to fluctuate quarter to quarter as they do not require the longer planning and lead times necessary for new data creation.

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, total revenue (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Cash resales	$	22,630	$	23,129	$	45,075	$	62,298
Other revenue components:
Acquisition underwriting revenue	15,397		16,891		40,486		53,463
Non-monetary exchanges	261		—		585		709
Revenue recognition adjustments	8,303		4,367		10,375		(806		)
Solutions and other	953		1,641		2,374		2,911
Total revenue	$	47,544	$	46,028	$	98,895	$	118,575

Cash EBITDA: Cash EBITDA represents cash generated from licensing data from our seismic library net of recurring cash operating expenses. We believe this measure is helpful in determining the level of cash from operations we have available for debt service and funding of capital expenditures (net of the portion funded or underwritten by our customers). Cash EBITDA includes cash resales plus all other cash revenues other than from data acquisitions, plus gains on sales of marketable securities and cash distributions from investments obtained as part of licensing our seismic data, less cost of goods sold and cash selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding non-recurring corporate expenses such as severance and legal, financial and other expenses related to corporate and strategic transactions).

The following is a quantitative reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, net income (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Cash EBITDA	$	17,701		$	18,432		$	34,357		$	51,105
Add (subtract) other revenue components not included in cash EBITDA:
Acquisition underwriting revenue	15,397			16,891			40,486			53,463
Non-monetary exchanges	261			—			585			709
Revenue recognition adjustments	8,303			4,367			10,375			(806		)
Solutions non-cash revenue	—			—			—			20
Add (subtract) other items included in net income:
Depreciation and amortization	(27,829		)	(29,837		)	(57,167		)	(69,221		)
Non-cash operating expenses	(272		)	(315		)	(498		)	(460		)
Non-recurring corporate expenses	(163		)	(573		)	(153		)	(871		)
Interest expense, net	(6,138		)	(7,253		)	(15,453		)	(14,472		)
Foreign currency losses	(1,171		)	(426		)	(1,818		)	(15		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			—			(1,504		)	—
Other income	—			2			1			83
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	279			(18		)	(1,105		)	(3,559		)
Net income	$	6,368		$	1,270		$	8,106		$	15,976

Growth of Our Seismic Data Library: We regularly add to our seismic data library through four different methods: (1) recording new data; (2) buying ownership of existing data for cash; (3) obtaining ownership of existing data sets through non-monetary exchanges; and (4) creating new value-added products from existing data within our library. For the period from January 1, 2013 to August 7, 2013, we completed the addition of approximately 1,900 square miles of seismic data to our library. As of August 7, 2013, we had approximately 1,300 square miles of seismic data in progress.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

We operate in one business segment, which is made up of seismic data acquisition, seismic data licensing, seismic data processing and seismic reproduction services. There have not been any changes in our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2012.

Results of Operations

Revenue

The following table summarizes the components of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Acquisition underwriting revenue:
Cash underwriting	$	15,370	$	16,531	$	40,402	$	51,835
Underwriting from non-monetary exchanges	27		360		84		1,628
Total acquisition underwriting revenue	15,397		16,891		40,486		53,463
Resale licensing revenue:
Cash resales	22,630		23,129		45,075		62,298
Non-monetary exchanges	261		—		585		709
Revenue recognition adjustments	8,303		4,367		10,375		(806		)
Total resale licensing revenue	31,194		27,496		56,035		62,201
Total seismic revenue	46,591		44,387		96,521		115,664
Solutions and other	953		1,641		2,374		2,911
Total revenue	$	47,544	$	46,028	$	98,895	$	118,575

Total revenue was $47.5 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $46.0 million in the second quarter of 2012. Acquisition underwriting revenue was $15.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $16.9 million in the second quarter of 2012. We continued to focus the majority of our new data acquisition activity in the second quarter of 2013 in the Eagle Ford, Utica/Marcellus and Granite Wash (Panhandle Plays) unconventional plays. Total resale licensing revenue was $31.2 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $27.5 million in the second quarter of 2012. Although total resale licensing revenue increased 13.4%, cash resales in the second quarter of 2013 of $22.6 million were relatively flat when compared to cash resales in the second quarter of 2012 of $23.1 million. We believe this level of cash resales is well within the bandwidth of expected cash resales in any one quarter. Since our clients operate on an annual budget cycle, cash resales can vary quarter to quarter. Revenue recognition adjustments are non-cash adjustments to revenue and reflect the net amount of (i) revenue deferred as a result of all of the revenue recognition criteria not being met and (ii) the subsequent revenue recognition once the criteria are met. The change in revenue recognition adjustments between 2012 and 2013 was primarily due to fewer contracts requiring deferral in the second quarter of 2013. Solutions and other revenue was $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2012. The $0.6 million decrease was primarily due to the variation in the types of products delivered.

Total revenue for the first six months of 2013 was $98.9 million compared to $118.6 million in the first six months of 2012. Acquisition underwriting revenue was $40.5 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $53.5 million in the first six months of 2012. The decrease was primarily due to fewer square miles of data being acquired in Canada in 2013 compared to 2012. The Company made a strategic decision to reduce its level of net cash capital expenditures on new data creation for 2013 as compared to 2012 and 2011, which directly impacts acquisition underwriting revenue. The majority of our new data acquisition activity in 2013 occurred in the Eagle Ford, Utica/Marcellus, Granite Wash (Panhandle Plays) and Cardium unconventional plays in North America. Total resale licensing revenue was $56.0 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to $62.2 million in the first six months of 2012. For the six months of 2013, cash resales were $45.1 million compared to $62.3 million in the same period last year. Cash resale activity is tied closely to our clients' annual budget cycles and therefore is better viewed on an annual basis. As a result, cash resale activity can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. The increase of $11.2 million in revenue recognition adjustments from the first six months of 2012 to the first six months of 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in the deferral of new licensing contracts and an increase in selection of data from open library card contracts, partially offset by a decrease in the recognition of revenue previously deferred as a result of new data acquisition projects being completed and delivered. Solutions and other revenue decreased approximately $0.5

Table of Contents

million in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to the variation in the types of products delivered and fewer third party data processing projects in 2013.

At June 30, 2013, we had a deferred revenue balance of $45.7 million, compared to the December 31, 2012 balance of $52.9 million. The deferred revenue balance related to (i) data licensing contracts on which selection of specific data had not yet occurred, (ii) deferred revenue on data acquisition projects and (iii) contracts in which the data products are not yet available or the revenue recognition criteria has not yet been met. The deferred revenue will be recognized when selection of specific data is made by the customer, upon expiration of the data selection period specified in the data licensing contracts, as work progresses on the data acquisition contracts, as the data products become available or as all of the revenue recognition criteria are met.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was composed of the following for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Amortization of seismic data:
Income forecast	$	20,812	$	22,081	$	43,520	$	53,893
Straight-line	5,325		6,098		10,261		11,842
Total amortization of seismic data	26,137		28,179		53,781		65,735
Depreciation of property and equipment	264		219		520		598
Amortization of acquired intangibles	1,428		1,439		2,866		2,888
Total	$	27,829	$	29,837	$	57,167	$	69,221

Total seismic data library amortization amounted to $26.1 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $28.2 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $53.8 million for the first half of 2013 compared to $65.7 million for the first half of 2012. The amount of seismic data library amortization fluctuates based on the level and location of specific seismic surveys licensed (including licensing resulting from new data acquisition) and selected by our customers during any period as well as the amount of straight-line amortization required under our accounting policy.

Seismic data amortization as a percentage of total seismic revenue is summarized as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Components of Amortization	2013		2012		2013		2012
Income forecast	44.7	%	49.7	%	45.1	%	46.6	%
Straight-line	11.4	%	13.7	%	10.6	%	10.2	%
Total	56.1	%	63.4	%	55.7	%	56.8	%

The percentage of income forecast amortization to total seismic revenue decreased between the 2013 and 2012 periods presented due to the mix of data being licensed. In all periods, we had resale revenue recognized from data whose costs were fully amortized. In the second quarter and first six months of 2013, 54% and 61%, respectively of resale revenue recognized was from data whose costs were fully amortized as compared to 46% and 62% in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, respectively. Amortization expense related to new data acquisition decreased between the periods due to the lower level of acquisition revenue. Straight-line amortization represents the expense required under our accounting policy to ensure our data value is fully amortized within four years of when the data becomes available for sale. The amount of straight-line amortization decreased $0.8 million between the second quarters of 2012 and 2013 and decreased $1.6 million between the first six months of 2012 and 2013 due to the distribution of revenue among the various seismic surveys.

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $6.3 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $7.7 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $13.6 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to $15.8 million in the first six months of 2012. SG&A expenses are made up of the following cash and non-cash expenses (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Cash SG&A expenses	$	5,982	$	7,390	$	13,143	$	15,337
Non-cash compensation expense	272		245		498		318
Non-cash rent expense	—		70		—		142
Total	$	6,254	$	7,705	$	13,641	$	15,797

The decrease in cash SG&A expenses of $1.4 million from the second quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2013 and $2.2 million from the first six months of 2012 to the first six months of 2013 was primarily attributable to (i) a decrease in variable SG&A expenses, mainly annual cash incentive compensation due to our 2013 second quarter and year-to-date cash EBITDA being lower than the established cash bonus targets for 2013 for the same periods, and (ii) a decrease in non-recurring corporate expenses mainly related to debt restructure costs.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, was $6.1 million and $15.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2013, respectively, compared to $7.3 million and $14.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, respectively. The decrease in interest expense, net, of $1.2 million from the second quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2013 was mainly due to the refinancing of our 9.75% Senior Notes in March 2013 which resulted in a lower level of debt at a lower interest rate. The increase in interest expense, net, of $1.0 million from the first six months of 2012 to the first six months of 2013 was primarily due to the fact that the 2013 period included interest on both our old 9.75% Senior Notes and our new 9½% Senior Notes from date of issuance of the new senior notes on March 20, 2013 until the legal discharge of the old senior notes on April 18, 2013.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

In connection with the early extinguishment of our 9.75% Senior Notes in March 2013, we recorded a $1.5 million non-cash charge which included the write-off of unamortized issue expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) was $(0.3) million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $18,000 in the second quarter of 2012. The benefit in the second quarter of 2013 was comprised of a benefit of $0.8 million related to our Canadian operations offset by an expense of $0.5 million in U.S. state taxes. The expense in the second quarter of 2012 was comprised of $0.2 million related to our Canadian operations offset by a $0.2 million benefit related to U.S. state tax expenses.

Tax expense was $1.1 million and $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The expense for the first six months of 2013 was comprised of (i) $0.9 million in U.S. state tax expense, (ii) $0.1 million in U.S. Federal taxes related to our estimated alternative minimum tax liability and (iii) $0.1 million related to interest on uncertain tax positions. The expense for the first six months of 2012 was comprised of (i) an expense of $3.4 million related to our Canadian operations, (ii) an expense of $0.1 million related to interest on uncertain tax positions and (iii) $0.1 million in U.S. state tax expense.

Net Income

Net income was $6.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $8.1 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to $16.0 million in the first six months of 2012. The $5.1 million increase in net income from the second quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2013 was primarily due to slightly higher revenue coupled with lower amortization of seismic data, a reduction in SG&A expenses and lower interest expense. The decrease in net income of $7.9 million from the first six months of 2012 to the first six months of 2013 was primarily due to lower revenue partially offset by a reduction in amortization expense associated with our data library, a reduction in SG&A expenses and lower income tax expense. The first six months of 2013 also included a $1.5 million non-cash charge related to the early extinguishment of our 9.75% Senior Notes as well as additional interest expense as a result of the refinancing of these senior notes.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2013, we had $25.2 million in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, including $0.8 million of restricted cash. Our foreign subsidiary regularly holds cash which is used to reinvest in our Canadian operations. If we decide at a later date to repatriate those funds to the U.S., we may be required to provide taxes on certain of those funds based on applicable U.S. tax rates net of foreign taxes. Cash held by our foreign subsidiary fluctuates throughout the year and at June 30, 2013, was $2.3 million.

In addition to the cash on our balance sheet, other sources of liquidity, including our Credit Facility, are described below. For additional information regarding the Credit Facility and the 9½% Senior Notes, See Note D - “Debt” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements herein.

Credit Facility: On May 25, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement which provides us with the ability to borrow up to $30.0 million. The Credit Facility provides a $30.0 million revolving credit facility with a Canadian sublimit of $5.0 million, subject to borrowing base limitations based on our seismic data assets and eligible accounts receivable, each as defined in the Credit Facility, calculated on a monthly basis. U.S. borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest based on, at our option, either the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin, or the base rate, as defined in the agreement, plus an applicable margin. Canadian borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest based on a Canadian base rate, as defined in the agreement. In addition, we are required to pay an unused line fee of 0.50% per annum in respect of any unutilized commitments under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility expires on May 25, 2016. As of June 30, 2013, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facility and there was $20.0 million of availability.

9½% Senior Unsecured Notes: On March 20, 2013, we issued in a private placement $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 9½% Senior Notes. The proceeds from the 9½% Senior Notes, together with $29.8 million cash on hand, were used to satisfy and discharge the 9.75% Senior Notes, including accrued interest of $4.8 million. Interest is payable in cash, semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2013.

We may from time to time, as part of various financing and investment strategies, purchase our outstanding indebtedness. These purchases, if any, could have a material positive or negative impact on our liquidity available to repay outstanding debt obligations or on our consolidated results of operations.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities: Cash flows provided by operating activities were $74.3 million and $98.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Operating cash flows for 2013 decreased from 2012 primarily due to (i) lower data acquisition activity resulting in reduced collections on acquisition underwriting partially offset by an increase in collections on cash resales, (ii) higher interest payments during the year associated with the satisfaction and discharge of our 9.75% Senior Notes and (iii) an increase in income taxes paid.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Cash flows used in investing activities were $78.7 million and $113.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash expenditures for seismic data were $77.9 million and $113.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in cash invested in seismic data for 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to decreased data acquisition activity in Canada partially offset by higher capital expenditure payments in the U.S.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Cash flows used in financing activities were $32.0 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This increase was due to the refinancing of our 9.75% Senior Notes whereby we used $25.0 million cash on hand to pay down principal and paid $6.8 million in fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of our 9½% Senior Notes.

Anticipated Liquidity: Our ability to cover our operating and capital expenses, make required debt service payments on our 9½% Senior Notes, incur additional indebtedness and comply with our various debt covenants will depend primarily on our ability to generate substantial operating cash flows. Over the next 12 months, we expect to obtain the funds necessary to pay our operating, capital and other expenses as well as interest on our 9½% Senior Notes and principal and interest on our other indebtedness from our operating cash flows, cash and cash equivalents on hand and, if required, from additional borrowings (to the extent available under our Credit Facility subject to the borrowing base). Our ability to satisfy our payment obligations depends substantially on our future operating and financial performance, which necessarily will be affected by, and subject to, industry, market, economic and other factors. If necessary, we could choose to reduce our spending on capital projects and operating expenses to ensure we operate within the cash flow generated from our operations. We will not be able to predict or control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in the markets where we operate and competitive pressures.

Table of Contents

Deferred Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, we had a net deferred tax liability of $4.9 million attributable to our Canadian operations. In the U.S., we had a Federal deferred tax asset of $96.4 million, all of which was fully offset by a valuation allowance. The recognition of the U.S. Federal deferred tax asset will not occur until such time that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the U.S. Federal deferred tax asset will be realized. As of June 30, 2013, it was more likely than not that all of the U.S. Federal deferred tax asset will not be realized. Additionally, in the U.S., we had a state deferred tax asset of $730,000 of which $646,000 was offset by a valuation allowance. The remaining state deferred tax asset of $84,000 was recognized as it is more likely than not that the state deferred tax asset will be realized.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Other than operating leases, we do not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expense, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Capital Expenditures

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, capital expenditures for seismic data and other property and equipment amounted to $69.1 million. Our capital expenditures for the remainder of 2013 are presently estimated to be $86.4 million. The first six months of 2013 actual and 2013 estimated remaining capital expenditures are comprised of the following (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013			Estimate for Remainder of 2013			Total Estimate for 2013
New data acquisition	$	63,311		$	78,689		$	142,000
Cash purchases and data processing	2,238			2,762			5,000
Non-monetary exchanges	2,977			3,523			6,500
Property and equipment and other	602			1,398			2,000
Total capital expenditures	69,128			86,372			155,500
Less: Non-monetary exchanges	(2,977		)	(3,523		)	(6,500		)
Changes in working capital	12,382			—			12,382
Cash investment per statement of cash flows	$	78,533		$	82,849		$	161,382

Net cash capital expenditures represent total capital expenditures less cash underwriting revenue from our clients and non-cash additions to the seismic data library. We believe this measure is important as it reflects the amount of capital expenditures funded from our operating cash flow. The following table shows how our net cash capital expenditures (a non-GAAP financial measure) are derived from total capital expenditures, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure (in thousands):



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013			Estimate for Remainder of 2013			Total Estimate for 2013
Total capital expenditures	$	69,128		$	86,372		$	155,500
Less: Non-cash additions	(2,977		)	(3,523		)	(6,500		)
Cash underwriting	(40,402		)	(56,098		)	(96,500		)
Net cash capital expenditures	$	25,749		$	26,751		$	52,500

As of August 7, 2013, we had capital expenditure commitments related to data acquisition projects of approximately $71.9 million, of which we have obtained approximately $51.1 million of cash underwriting. We expect approximately 80% of our $20.8 million committed net cash capital expenditures to be incurred in 2013 with the remainder being incurred in 2014. See discussion of our sources of liquidity under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” beginning on page 30 of this Quarterly Report.

Table of Contents


Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk, including adverse changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, we have not entered into financial instruments to mitigate these risks. We do not enter into derivative or other financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

Hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates chosen for the estimated sensitivity analysis are considered to be reasonable near-term changes generally based on consideration of past fluctuations for each risk category. However, since it is not possible to accurately predict future changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, these hypothetical changes may not necessarily be an indicator of probable future fluctuations.

The following information about our market-sensitive financial instruments constitutes a “forward-looking statement.”

Interest Rate Risk

We may enter into various financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps or interest rate lock agreements, to manage the impact of changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2013, we did not have any open interest rate swap or interest rate lock agreements. Therefore, our exposure to changes in interest rates primarily results from our long-term debt with fixed interest rates and our short-term debt with floating interest rates if we were to borrow under our Credit Facility. See also our “Interest Rate Risk” disclosure under Item 7A. in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Our Canadian subsidiary conducts business in the Canadian dollar and is therefore subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk on cash flows related to sales, expenses, financing and investing transactions in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, we do not have any open forward exchange contracts.

Additionally, certain intercompany balances between our U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are denominated in U.S. dollars. Since this is not the functional currency of our Canadian subsidiary, the changes in these balances are translated in our Consolidated Statements of Income. As a result, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk as it relates to these intercompany balances. A sensitivity analysis indicates that, based on the intercompany balance as of June 30, 2013, if the U.S. dollar strengthened or weakened 3% (determined using an average of the last three years' historical exchange rates) against the Canadian dollar, the effect upon our Consolidated Statements of Income would be approximately $1.0 million.

We have not had any significant changes in our market risk exposures during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.


Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013 were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Part I, Item 1, Note G to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS

For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2013, and the other information set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. You should be aware that these risk factors and other information may not describe every risk we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Item 6. EXHIBITS

Those exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits filed herewith and such listing is incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




	SEITEL, INC.

Date: August 12, 2013		/s/ Robert D. Monson
		Robert D. Monson
		Chief Executive Officer and President
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)




Date: August 12, 2013		/s/ Marcia H. Kendrick
		Marcia H. Kendrick
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT

INDEX




Exhibit		Title

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-144844, as filed with the SEC on July 25, 2007).
3.2		Bylaws of Seitel, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-144844, as filed with the SEC on July 25, 2007).
10.1	†	Employment Agreement between Stephen Graham Hallows and Seitel, Inc. dated April 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 (File No. 001-10165)).
31.1	*	Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	*	Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	**	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	**	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101.INS	**	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.



†	Management contract, compensation plan or arrangement.



*	Filed herewith.



**	Furnished, not filed.