Ingram Micro, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended April 1, 2006 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ___________ |
Commission file number: 1-12203
Ingram Micro Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
62-1644402 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1600 E. St. Andrew Place, Santa Ana, California 92705-4931 |
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices) |
|
|
|
(714) 566-1000 |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The Registrant had 164,632,676 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
outstanding at
April 1, 2006.
INGRAM MICRO INC.
INDEX
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
INGRAM MICRO INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
1, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
326,262 |
|
|
$ |
324,481 |
|
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $83,225 and $81,831) |
|
|
3,087,211 |
|
|
|
3,186,115 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,193,118 |
|
|
|
2,208,660 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
336,182 |
|
|
|
352,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,942,773 |
|
|
|
6,071,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
175,020 |
|
|
|
179,435 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
637,810 |
|
|
|
638,416 |
|
Other |
|
|
146,733 |
|
|
|
145,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,902,336 |
|
|
$ |
7,034,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,264,809 |
|
|
$ |
3,476,845 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
407,412 |
|
|
|
479,422 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
117,177 |
|
|
|
149,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,789,398 |
|
|
|
4,105,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
526,805 |
|
|
|
455,650 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
35,219 |
|
|
|
35,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,351,422 |
|
|
|
4,596,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized; 164,632,676 and 162,366,283
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 135,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
913,398 |
|
|
|
874,984 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,600,482 |
|
|
|
1,538,761 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
35,388 |
|
|
|
23,324 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,550,914 |
|
|
|
2,438,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,902,336 |
|
|
$ |
7,034,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
3
INGRAM MICRO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
7,598,845 |
|
|
$ |
7,051,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7,193,301 |
|
|
|
6,672,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
405,544 |
|
|
|
379,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
307,151 |
|
|
|
300,555 |
|
Reorganization costs |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,627 |
|
|
|
303,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
98,917 |
|
|
|
76,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
12,636 |
|
|
|
11,780 |
|
Net foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
1,938 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,193 |
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
85,724 |
|
|
|
61,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
24,003 |
|
|
|
19,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
61,721 |
|
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
4
INGRAM MICRO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in 000s)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
61,721 |
|
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,204 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
Stock-based compensation under FAS 123R |
|
|
7,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation under FAS 123R |
|
|
(2,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncash charges for interest and other compensation |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
7,475 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect
of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
86,243 |
|
|
|
274,276 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
203,818 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
9,835 |
|
|
|
143,088 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(174,070 |
) |
|
|
(649,585 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(27,207 |
) |
|
|
(176,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used by operating activities |
|
|
(13,814 |
) |
|
|
(139,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(7,285 |
) |
|
|
(9,029 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(30,542 |
) |
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(37,827 |
) |
|
|
(10,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
31,299 |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation under FAS 123R |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdrafts |
|
|
(24,401 |
) |
|
|
(57,438 |
) |
Net proceeds from debt |
|
|
38,644 |
|
|
|
72,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
48,381 |
|
|
|
21,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(10,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
(138,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
324,481 |
|
|
|
398,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
326,262 |
|
|
$ |
260,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
5
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation
Ingram Micro Inc. (Ingram Micro) and its subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the
distribution of information technology (IT) products and supply chain management services
worldwide. Ingram Micro operates in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ingram Micro and its
subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as the Company). These consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of management,
the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments
(consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the financial position
of the Company as of April 1, 2006, and its results of operations and cash flows for the thirteen
weeks ended April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. As permitted under the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC, these consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures and
footnotes normally included with annual consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31,
2005. The results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 may not be indicative
of the results of operations that can be expected for the full year.
Note 2 Earnings Per Share
The Company reports a dual presentation of Basic Earnings per Share (Basic EPS) and Diluted
Earnings per Share (Diluted EPS). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock awards and other commitments
to issue common stock were exercised using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method,
where applicable.
The computation of Basic EPS and Diluted EPS is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
61,721 |
|
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
163,489,924 |
|
|
|
159,173,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares including the dilutive effect of stock
awards (5,787,662 and 4,713,347 for the thirteen weeks ended
April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005, respectively) |
|
|
169,277,586 |
|
|
|
163,887,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were approximately 1,810,000 and 7,933,000 stock awards for the thirteen weeks ended
April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005, respectively, that were not included in the computation of Diluted
EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Class A Common
Stock during the respective periods, thereby resulting in an antidilutive effect.
Note 3 Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS
123R). FAS 123R addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an
enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the
enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity
6
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. In March 2005,
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB
107) regarding its interpretation of FAS 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public
companies. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of FAS 123R.
FAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the
intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25), and instead generally requires that such transactions be accounted
for using a fair-value-based method. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
determine the fair value of stock options under FAS 123R, consistent with the method used for its
pro forma disclosures under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123). The Company has elected the modified prospective transition
method as permitted by FAS 123R; and accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect
the impact of FAS 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based
compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered
beginning on January 1, 2006, the first day of the Companys fiscal year 2006. Stock-based
compensation expense for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 is based on the grant date fair
value as previously determined under the disclosure only provisions of FAS 123. The Company
recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period of the award, which is the vesting term of outstanding stock
awards. The Company estimated the forfeiture rate for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 based
on its historical experience during the preceding five fiscal years.
Compensation expense for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 recognized upon adoption of
FAS 123R was $7,953 and the related deferred tax asset established was $2,227. In accordance with
FAS 123R, beginning in the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006, the Company has presented excess tax
benefits from the exercise of stock-based compensation awards both as an operating activity and as
a financing activity in its consolidated statement of cash flows.
Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the Company measured compensation expense for its employee
stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25. Under APB
25, when the exercise price of the Companys employee stock options was equal to the market price
of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense was recognized. The
Company applied the disclosure only provisions of FAS 123 as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, as if the fair-value-based method had been applied in measuring compensation expense.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation for
the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen |
|
|
|
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, 2005 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
Compensation expense as determined under
FAS 123, net of related tax effects |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
37,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair
value of stock options. The Black-Scholes model incorporates various assumptions including
volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical
volatility of the Companys common stock over the
7
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Companys stock
options. The expected life of an award is based on historical experience and the terms and
conditions of the stock awards granted to employees. The fair value of options granted in the
thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005 was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model assuming no dividends and using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Expected life of stock options |
|
4.0 years |
|
3.5 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
3.56 |
% |
Expected stock volatility |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
Equity Incentive Plan
As of April 1, 2006, the Company has a single stock incentive plan, the 2003 Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2003 Plan), for the granting of stock-based incentive awards including incentive stock
options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock
appreciation rights, among others, to key employees and members of the Companys Board of
Directors. Prior to 2006, the Companys stock-based incentive awards were primarily in the form of
stock options. Beginning in January 2006, the Company reduced the level of grants of stock options
compared to previous years and now grants restricted stock and restricted stock units, in addition
to stock options, to key employees and members of the Companys Board of Directors. Options granted
generally vest over a period of three years and have expiration dates not longer than 10 years. A
portion of the restricted stock and restricted stock units vests over a time period of one to three
years. The remainder of the restricted stock and restricted stock units vests upon achievement of
certain performance measures based on earnings growth and return on invested capital over a
three-year period. As of April 1, 2006, approximately 17,800,000 shares were available for grant.
Stock Award Activity
Stock option activity under the 2003 Plan was as follows for the thirteen weeks ended April 1,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
30,558 |
|
|
$ |
15.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
19.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
13.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
25.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 1, 2006 |
|
|
27,949 |
|
|
|
15.52 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
140,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at April 1, 2006 |
|
|
26,336 |
|
|
|
15.52 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
133,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at April 1, 2006 |
|
|
19,885 |
|
|
|
15.49 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
104,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on April 1, 2006 and the option exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the-money options on April 1, 2006. This amount changes based on the fair market
value of the Companys common stock. Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the
thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 was $14,503. Total fair value of stock options vested and
expensed was $6,012 for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006. As of April 1, 2006, the Company
expects $27,316 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
Cash received from stock option exercises for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 was
$31,299 and the actual benefit realized for the tax deduction from stock option exercises of the
share-based payment awards totaled $3,201 for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006.
Activity related to nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock units was as follows for
the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
18.43 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
19.56 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
19.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at April 1, 2006 |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
19.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 1, 2006, the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested
restricted stock was $18,728. The Company expects this cost to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
Note 4 Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (FAS
130), establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components
in the Companys consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined in FAS 130 as
the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and
other events and circumstances from nonowner sources and is comprised of net income and other
comprehensive income, which consists solely of changes in foreign currency translation adjustments,
for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005 as presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
61,721 |
|
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
12,064 |
|
|
|
(27,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
73,785 |
|
|
$ |
14,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders equity totaled $35,388 and
$23,324 at April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and consisted solely of foreign
currency translation adjustments.
9
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 5 Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and
April 2, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia- |
|
|
Latin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Pacific |
|
|
America |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
156,132 |
|
|
$ |
11,727 |
|
|
$ |
470,557 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
638,416 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(1,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2006 |
|
$ |
156,698 |
|
|
$ |
12,133 |
|
|
$ |
468,979 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
637,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
78,495 |
|
|
$ |
12,775 |
|
|
$ |
468,395 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
559,665 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2005 |
|
$ |
78,488 |
|
|
$ |
12,147 |
|
|
$ |
468,733 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
559,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006, the Company made an adjustment to the purchase
price allocation associated with the acquisition of AVAD to reduce the value of net assets acquired
by $571 to reflect the final fair value assessment resulting in an increase of goodwill for that
same amount.
In 2002, the Company acquired a value-add IT distributor in Belgium. The purchase agreement
required payments of an initial purchase price plus additional cash payments of up to Euro 1,130
for each of the next three years after 2002 based on an earn-out formula. The addition to goodwill
of $97 in Europe for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 reflects settlement with the sellers for the final earn-out achievement.
In January 2005, the Company acquired the remaining shares of stock held by minority
shareholders of a subsidiary in New Zealand. The total purchase price for this acquisition
consisted of a cash payment of $225, resulting in the recording of approximately $206 of goodwill
in Asia-Pacific.
For the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005, the Company made an adjustment to the purchase
price allocation associated with the acquisition of Techpac Holdings Limited (Tech Pacific). The
adjustment reflects additional liabilities of $1,147 for costs associated with reductions in Tech
Pacifics workforce as well as closure and consolidation of redundant facilities of the acquired
company. This adjustment resulted in an increase of goodwill for that same amount.
Note 6 Reorganization, Integration and Major-Program Costs
In 2005, the Company announced an outsourcing and optimization plan to improve operating
efficiencies within its North American region. Total costs of the actions, or major-program costs,
incurred for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005 were $5,469 ($441 of reorganization costs,
primarily for workforce reductions for approximately 15 employees, as well as $5,028 of other costs
charged to selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses primarily for consulting,
retention and other expenses). The plan, which was substantially completed in 2005, included an
outsourcing arrangement that moved transaction-oriented service and support functions including
certain North America positions in finance and shared services, customer service, vendor management
and certain U.S. positions in technical support and inside sales (excluding field sales and
management positions) to a leading global business process outsource provider. As part of the
plan, the Company also restructured and consolidated other job functions within the North American
region.
10
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
In November 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Tech Pacific, one of
Asia-Pacifics largest technology distributors, for cash and the assumption of debt. This
acquisition provided the Company with a strong management and employee base, a history of solid
operating margins and profitability, and a strong presence in the growing Asia-Pacific region.
Total integration expenses incurred for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005 were $4,062,
comprised of $1,951 of reorganization costs primarily for employee termination benefits for
approximately 230 employees, facility exit costs and other contract termination costs for
associates and facilities of Ingram Micro made redundant by the acquisition as well as $2,111 of
other costs charged to SG&A primarily for consulting, retention and other expenses related to the
integration of this acquisition. The Company substantially completed the integration of the
operations of its pre-existing Asia-Pacific business with Tech Pacific in 2005.
In addition, in prior periods, the Company implemented other actions designed to improve
operating income through reductions of SG&A expenses and enhancements in gross margins. Key
components of those initiatives included enhancement and/or rationalization of vendor and customer
programs, optimization of facilities and systems, outsourcing of certain IT infrastructure
functions, geographic consolidations and administrative restructuring.
Reorganization Costs
Quarter ended April 1, 2006
The credit adjustment to reorganization costs of $524 for the thirteen weeks ended April 1,
2006 consisted of $513 in North America related to detailed actions taken in prior years for lower
than expected costs associated with employee termination benefits and facility consolidations and
$11 in Europe related to detailed actions taken in prior years for lower than expected costs
associated with facility consolidations.
Actions during the year ended December 31, 2005
Reorganization costs during fiscal year 2005 consisted of charges relating to the outsourcing
and optimization plan in North America and the integration of Tech Pacific in Asia-Pacific. The
reorganization costs in North America include employee termination benefits and estimated lease
exit costs in connection with closing and consolidating facilities. The reorganization costs in
Asia-Pacific include employee termination benefits, estimated lease exit costs in connection with
closing and consolidating redundant facilities and other costs primarily due to contract
terminations.
The payment activities and adjustments for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and the
remaining liability at April 1, 2006 related to these detailed actions are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Amounts Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
and Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Against the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2006 |
|
Employee termination benefits |
|
$ |
2,760 |
|
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
(275 |
) |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
Facility costs |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
(275 |
) |
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment reflects lower than expected costs associated with employee termination
benefits in North America.
11
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Actions during the year ended January 3, 2004
Reorganization costs during fiscal year 2003 were primarily comprised of employee termination
benefits for workforce reductions worldwide and lease exit costs for facility consolidations in
North America, Europe and Latin America. These restructuring actions are complete; however, future
cash outlays will be required primarily due to future lease payments related to exited facilities.
The payment activities and adjustments for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and the
remaining liability at April 1, 2006 related to these detailed actions are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Amounts Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
and Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Against the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2006 |
|
Facility costs |
|
$ |
1,661 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment reflects lower than expected costs to settle a lease obligation in Europe.
Actions prior to December 28, 2002
Prior to December 28, 2002, detailed actions under the Companys reorganization plans included
workforce reductions and facility consolidations worldwide as well as outsourcing of certain IT
infrastructure functions. Facility consolidations primarily included consolidation, closing or
downsizing of office facilities, distribution centers, returns processing centers and configuration
centers throughout North America, consolidation and/or exit of warehouse and office facilities in
Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific, and other costs primarily comprised of contract termination
expenses associated with outsourcing certain IT infrastructure functions as well as other costs
associated with the reorganization activities. These restructuring actions are completed; however,
future cash outlays will be required primarily for future lease payments related to exited
facilities.
The payment activities and adjustments for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and the
remaining liability at April 1, 2006 related to these detailed actions are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Amounts Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
and Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Against the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2006 |
|
Employee termination benefits |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Facility costs |
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,908 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment reflects lower than expected costs to settle a lease obligation in North
America.
Integration and Major-Program Costs
Integration and major-program costs recorded in SG&A expenses for the thirteen weeks ended
April 2, 2005 totaled $7,139, of which $5,028 reflects costs associated with the Companys
outsourcing and optimization plan in North America, primarily comprised of consulting, retention,
and other related costs and $2,111 reflects costs associated with the integration of Tech Pacific
in Asia-Pacific, primarily comprised of consulting, retention and other integration related costs.
12
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 7 Long-Term Debt
The Companys debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
North American revolving trade accounts receivable-backed
financing facilities |
|
$ |
427,881 |
|
|
$ |
343,026 |
|
Asia-Pacific revolving trade accounts receivable-backed
financing facilities |
|
|
98,924 |
|
|
|
112,624 |
|
Revolving unsecured credit facilities and other debt |
|
|
117,177 |
|
|
|
149,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643,982 |
|
|
|
604,867 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
(117,177 |
) |
|
|
(149,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
526,805 |
|
|
$ |
455,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Segment Information
The Company operates predominantly in a single industry segment as a distributor of IT
products and services. The Companys operating segments are based on geographic location, and the
measure of segment profit is income from operations. The Company does not allocate stock-based
compensation recognized under FAS 123R to its operating units; therefore the Company is reporting
this as a separate amount.
Geographic areas in which the Company operates during 2006 include North America (United
States and Canada), Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy,
The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom), Asia-Pacific
(Australia, The Peoples Republic of China including Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, New Zealand,
Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Thailand), and Latin America (Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and the Companys
Latin American export operations in Miami). Intergeographic sales primarily represent intercompany
sales that are accounted for based on established sales prices between the related companies and
are eliminated in consolidation.
Financial information by geographic segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to unaffiliated customers |
|
$ |
3,206,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,939,286 |
|
Intergeographic sales |
|
|
54,579 |
|
|
|
42,527 |
|
Europe |
|
|
2,702,627 |
|
|
|
2,648,187 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,332,832 |
|
|
|
1,185,658 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
356,791 |
|
|
|
278,861 |
|
Eliminations of intergeographic sales |
|
|
(54,579 |
) |
|
|
(42,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,598,845 |
|
|
$ |
7,051,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
51,859 |
|
|
$ |
29,901 |
|
Europe |
|
|
34,521 |
|
|
|
37,003 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
6,073 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
3,249 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized under FAS 123R |
|
|
(7,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98,917 |
|
|
$ |
76,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
4,147,773 |
|
|
$ |
3,689,795 |
|
Europe |
|
|
1,760,153 |
|
|
|
1,571,935 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
690,165 |
|
|
|
612,215 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
304,245 |
|
|
|
232,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,902,336 |
|
|
$ |
6,106,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
|
$ |
4,362 |
|
Europe |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,285 |
|
|
$ |
9,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
8,262 |
|
|
$ |
7,950 |
|
Europe |
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
3,709 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,204 |
|
|
$ |
15,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information relating to reorganization costs and other profit enhancement program
costs by geographic segment included in income from operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Reorganization costs (Note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
(513 |
) |
|
$ |
741 |
|
Europe |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(524 |
) |
|
$ |
2,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration and other major-program costs
charged to operating expenses (Note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,028 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies
As is customary in the IT distribution industry, the Company has arrangements with certain
finance companies that provide inventory-financing facilities for its customers. In conjunction
with certain of these arrangements, the Company has agreements with the finance companies that
would require it to repurchase certain inventory, which might be repossessed from the customers by
the finance companies. Due to various reasons, including among other items, the lack of
information regarding the amount of saleable inventory purchased from the Company still on hand
with the customer at any point in time, the Companys repurchase obligations relating to inventory
cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by the Company under these arrangements
have been insignificant to date.
At April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had remaining tax liabilities of $2,503
($2,786 and $2,711, including estimated interest at each respective date) related to the gains
realized on the sales of SOFTBANK Corp. (Softbank) common stock from 1999 to 2002. The Softbank
common stock was sold in the public market by certain of Ingram Micros foreign subsidiaries, which
are located in a low-tax jurisdiction. At the time of sale, the Company concluded that U.S. taxes
were not currently payable on the gains based on its internal assessment and opinions received from
its outside advisors. However, in situations involving uncertainties in the interpretation of
complex tax regulations by various taxing authorities, the Company provides for tax liabilities
unless it considers it probable that taxes will not be due. The level of opinions received from
its outside advisors and the Companys internal assessment did not allow the Company to reach that
conclusion on this matter. Although the Company reviews its assessments in these matters on a
regular basis, it cannot currently determine when these deferred tax liabilities will be finally
resolved with the taxing authorities, or if the deferred taxes will ultimately be paid. As a
result, the Company continues to provide for these tax liabilities. The Companys federal tax
returns for fiscal years through 2000 have been closed. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has
begun an examination process related to the Companys federal tax returns for fiscal years 2001 to
2003.
During 2002 and 2003, one of the Companys Latin American subsidiaries was audited by the
Brazilian taxing authorities in relation to certain commercial taxes. As a result of this audit,
the subsidiary received an assessment of 31.1 million Brazilian reais, including interest and
penalties computed through April 1, 2006, or approximately $14,300 at April 1, 2006, alleging these
commercial taxes were not properly remitted for the subsidiarys purchase of imported software
during the period January through September 2002. The Brazilian taxing authorities may make
similar claims for periods subsequent to September 2002. Additional assessments for periods
subsequent to September 2002, if received, may be significant either individually or in the
aggregate. It is managements opinion, based upon the opinions of outside legal counsel, that the
Company has valid defenses to the assessment of these taxes on the purchase of imported software
for the 2002 period at issue or any subsequent period. Although the Company is vigorously pursuing
administrative and judicial action to challenge the assessment, no assurance can be given as to the
ultimate outcome. An unfavorable resolution of this matter is not expected to have a material
impact on the Companys financial condition, but depending upon the time period and amounts
involved it may have a material negative effect on its consolidated results of operations or cash
flows.
The Company received an informal inquiry from the SEC during the third quarter of 2004. The
SECs focus to date has been related to certain transactions with McAfee, Inc. (formerly Network
Associates, Inc. or NAI) from 1998 through 2000. The Company also received subpoenas from the U.S.
Attorneys office for the Northern District of California (Department of Justice) in connection
with its grand jury investigation of NAI, which seek information concerning these transactions. On
January 4, 2006, McAfee and the SEC made public the terms of a settlement they had reached with
respect to McAfee. The Company continues to cooperate fully with the SEC and the Department of
Justice in their inquiries. The Company is engaged in discussions with the SEC toward a possible
resolution of matters concerning these NAI-related transactions. The Company cannot predict with
certainty the outcome of these discussions, nor their timing, nor can it reasonably estimate the
amount of any loss or range of loss that might be incurred as a result of the resolution of these
matters with the SEC and the Department of Justice. Such amounts may be material to the Companys
consolidated results of operations or cash flows.
There are various other claims, lawsuits and pending actions against the Company incidental to
its operations. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
15
INGRAM MICRO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in 000s, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 10 New Accounting Standards
In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position 143-1,
Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations, (FSP 143-1). FSP 143-1 provides
guidance on the accounting for certain obligations associated with the Waste Electrical and
Electronic Equipment Directive (the Directive), adopted by the European Union (EU). Under the
Directive, the waste management obligation for historical equipment (products put on the market on
or prior to August 13, 2005) remains with the commercial user until the customer replaces the
equipment. The Company will apply the provisions of FSP 143-1, which require the measurement in
recognition of the liability and obligation associated with the historical waste, upon the
Directives adoption into law by the applicable EU member countries in which it operates. The
Company is in the process of assessing what impact, if any, the Directive and FSP 143-1 may have on
its consolidated financial position or results of operations when and if the applicable EU member
countries adopt the Directive into law.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion includes forward-looking statements, including but not limited to,
managements expectations for competition; revenues, margin, expenses and other operating results
or ratios; operating efficiencies; economic conditions; effective income tax rates; capital
expenditures; liquidity; and capital requirements, acquisitions, operating models and exchange rate
fluctuations. In evaluating our business, readers should carefully consider the important factors
included in Item 1A Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. We disclaim any
duty to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview of Our Business
We are the largest distributor of information technology, or IT, products and supply chain
solutions worldwide based on revenues. We offer a broad range of IT products and services and help
generate demand and create efficiencies for our customers and suppliers around the world. The IT
distribution industry in which we operate is characterized by narrow gross profit as a percentage
of net sales, or gross margin, and narrow income from operations as a percentage of net sales, or
operating margin. Historically, our margins have been impacted by pressures from price
competition, as well as changes in vendor terms and conditions, including, but not limited to,
variations in vendor rebates and incentives, our ability to return inventory to vendors, and time
periods qualifying for price protection. We expect these competitive pricing pressures and
restrictive vendor terms and conditions to continue in the foreseeable future. To mitigate these
factors, we have implemented changes to and continue to refine our pricing strategies, inventory
management processes and vendor program processes. In addition, we continuously monitor and
change, as appropriate, certain terms and conditions offered to our customers to reflect those
being imposed by our vendors. Through our diversification of product offerings, we also improved
profitability by our entry into adjacent product segments such as the expansion into consumer
electronics and automatic identification and data capture markets. Our business also requires
significant levels of working capital primarily to finance accounts receivable. We have
historically relied on, and continue to rely heavily on, available cash, debt and trade credit from
vendors for our working capital needs.
In November 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Techpac Holdings Limited, or
Tech Pacific, one of Asia-Pacifics largest technology distributors, for cash and the assumption of
debt. This acquisition provided us with a strong management and employee base, a history of solid
operating margins and profitability, and a strong presence in the growing Asia-Pacific region.
Total integration expenses incurred in the first quarter of 2005 were $4.1 million, comprised of
$2.0 million of reorganization costs primarily for employee termination benefits, facility exit
costs and other contract termination costs for associates and facilities of Ingram Micro made
redundant by the acquisition as well as $2.1 million of other costs charged to SG&A primarily for
consulting, retention and other expenses related to the integration of this acquisition. We
substantially completed the integration of the operations of our pre-existing Asia-Pacific business
with Tech Pacific in the third quarter of 2005 (see Note 6 to our consolidated financial
statements).
We are constantly seeking ways to improve our operations by enhancing our capabilities while
reducing costs to provide an efficient flow of products and services, which may increase our
operating expenses in the short-term. For example, in 2005, we launched an outsourcing and
optimization plan to improve operating efficiencies within our North American region. Total costs
of the actions, or major-program costs, incurred in the first quarter of 2005 were $5.5 million,
consisting of $0.5 million of reorganization costs, primarily for workforce reductions, as well as
$5.0 million of other costs charged to SG&A primarily for consulting, retention and other expenses
(see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements). The plan, which was substantially completed
in fourth quarter of 2005, included an outsourcing arrangement that moved transaction-oriented
service and support functions including certain North America positions in finance and shared
services, customer service, vendor management and certain U.S. positions in technical support and
inside sales (excluding field sales and management positions) to a leading global business
process outsource provider. As part of the plan, we also restructured and consolidated other job
functions within the North American region. In addition, we plan to invest in certain IT
capabilities that we believe will improve our business over the long-term, but which could increase
operating expenses by approximately $5 million in the second quarter of 2006 and by a similar
amount in the third quarter of 2006.
17
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
In July 2005, we acquired certain net assets of AVAD, the leading distributor for solution
providers and custom installers serving the home automation and entertainment market in the U.S.
The custom installer market represents one of the fastest growing and most profitable segments of
consumer electronics. To complement this acquisition, we are pursuing new relationships with
consumer electronics manufacturers to bring new lines of converging technologies to solution
providers, direct marketers, e-tailers and retailers on a global basis. AVAD was acquired for an
initial purchase price of $136.4 million. The purchase agreement also requires us to pay the
seller earn-out payments of up to $80.0 million over the next three years if certain performance
levels are achieved, and additional payments of up to $100.0 million are possible in 2010, if
extraordinary performance levels are achieved over a five-year period. In the first quarter of
2006, the Company paid $30.0 million to the sellers for the initial earn-out in accordance with
the provisions of the purchase agreement. The initial purchase price and subsequent earn-out
payment were funded through our existing borrowing capacity and cash.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123R, using
the modified prospective transition method, and therefore have not restated our results of
operations for the prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense
for the first quarter of 2006 includes compensation expense for stock-based compensation awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, and for stock-based compensation
awards granted after December 31, 2005. FAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based
compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, or APB 25. We recognize stock-based
compensation under FAS 123R, net of an estimated forfeiture rate for those shares which are
expected to vest, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of an award. During
the first quarter of 2006, we recorded $8.0 million of stock-based compensation expense as a result
of the adoption of FAS 123R.
Results of Operations
We do not allocate stock-based compensation recognized under FAS 123R to our operating units;
therefore we are reporting this as a separate amount. The following tables set forth our net sales
by geographic region (excluding intercompany sales) and the percentage of total net sales
represented thereby, as well as operating income and operating margin by geographic region for each
of the thirteen weeks indicated (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
April 2, 2005 |
|
Net sales by geographic region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,599 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,052 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
April 2, 2005 |
|
Operating income and operating margin by
geographic region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
51.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
recognized under FAS 123R |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
$ |
76.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
We sell products purchased from many vendors, but generated approximately 22% and 24% of our
net sales for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005, respectively, from products
purchased from Hewlett-Packard Company. There were no other vendors that represented 10% or more
of our net sales in each of the last three years.
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statement of income as a
percentage of net sales, for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
April 2, 2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Reorganization costs |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations for the Thirteen Weeks Ended April 1, 2006 Compared to
Thirteen Weeks Ended April 2, 2005
Our consolidated net sales increased 7.8% to $7.60 billion for the thirteen weeks ended April
1, 2006, or first quarter of 2006, from $7.05 billion for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005,
or first quarter of 2005. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the improving
demand environment for IT products and services in most economies worldwide and additional revenue
from the AVAD acquisition in July 2005, partially offset by the translation impact of the
relatively weaker European currencies (negative impact of approximately three percentage points of
the worldwide sales growth).
Net sales from our North American operations increased 9.1% to $3.21 billion in the first
quarter of 2006 from $2.94 billion in the first quarter of 2005, primarily reflecting improving
demand for IT products and services in the region, particularly value added resellers, as well as
the additional revenue arising from the acquisition of AVAD. Net sales from our European
operations increased 2.1% to $2.70 billion in the first quarter of 2006 from $2.65 billion in the
first quarter of 2005, primarily due to improved demand for IT products and services in most
markets in Europe as well as share gains in certain markets, partially offset by the translation
impact of the relatively weaker European currencies compared to the U.S. dollar (negative impact of
approximately nine percentage points of the European sales growth). Net sales from our
Asia-Pacific operations increased 12.4% to $1.33 billion in the first quarter of 2006 from $1.19
billion in the first quarter of 2005, primarily reflecting the increased demand for IT products and
services in the region, particularly in Australia, China and India. We continue to focus on
profitable growth in our Asia-Pacific region and will continue to make changes to business
processes, add or delete products or customers, and implement other changes in the region. As a
result, revenue growth rates and profitability in this emerging region may fluctuate significantly
from quarter to quarter. Net sales from our Latin American operations increased by 27.9% to $357
million in the first quarter of 2006 from $279 million in the first quarter of 2005, reflecting the
regions improved demand environment and the strengthening of currencies in certain Latin American
markets.
19
Despite a more competitive environment brought on by vendor consolidation actions in Europe as
well as softer economies in some European markets, gross margin was 5.3% in the first quarter of
2006, relatively consistent with the gross margin of 5.4% in the first quarter of 2005. This
reflects the competitive pricing pressures in Europe and North America, partially offset by the
results of our ongoing product and geographic diversification strategy particularly in North
America, as well as improvements in our Asia-Pacific and Latin America businesses. We expect that
margin pressure from a more competitive market in Europe, attributable in part to the effect of
recent vendor consolidation actions, will continue in the second quarter of 2006. We continuously
evaluate and modify our pricing policies and certain terms and conditions offered to our customers
to reflect those being imposed by our vendors and general market conditions. As we continue to
evaluate our existing pricing policies and make future changes, if any, we may experience moderated
or negative sales growth in the near term. In addition, increased competition and any retractions
or softness in economies throughout the world may hinder our ability to maintain and/or improve
gross margins from the levels realized in recent quarters.
Total SG&A expenses increased 2.2% to $307.2 million in the first quarter of 2006 from $300.6
million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily attributable to
the $8.0 million in stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of FAS 123R and
the addition of AVAD, partially offset by the reduction of major-program and integration costs of
$5.0 million related to our outsourcing and optimization plan in North America and $2.1 million for
acquisition-related integration costs in Asia-Pacific, savings associated with these programs and
continued cost control measures. As a percentage of net sales, total SG&A expenses decreased to
4.0% in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 4.3% in the first quarter of 2005 primarily due to
economies of scale from a higher level of revenue and continued cost control measures, partially
offset by the increase in stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of FAS 123R.
We plan to invest in certain IT system capabilities that we believe will improve our business over
the long-term, but which could increase SG&A expenses by approximately $5 million in the second
quarter of 2006 and by a similar amount in the third quarter of 2006. We continue to pursue and
implement business process improvements and organizational changes to create sustained cost
reductions without sacrificing customer service over the long-term.
For the first quarter of 2006, the credit to reorganization costs was $0.5 million, consisting
primarily of adjustments related to detailed actions taken in prior years for lower than expected
costs associated with employee termination benefits and facility consolidations in North America.
For the first quarter of 2005, we incurred reorganization costs of $2.7 million, consisting of
charges of $2.4 million for detailed actions taken during the quarter and an adjustment of $0.3
million related to a previous action for higher than expected costs to settle a lease obligation in
North America. The reorganization costs of $2.4 million during the first quarter of 2005 consisted
of a charge of $0.5 million in North America representing employee termination benefits for
approximately 15 employees and a charge of $1.9 million in Asia-Pacific representing $1.6 million
of employee termination benefits for approximately 230 employees, $0.2 million for estimated lease
exit costs in connection with closing and consolidating redundant facilities and $0.1 million of
other costs primarily due to contract terminations.
Income from operations as a percentage of net sales, or operating margin, increased to 1.3% in
the first quarter of 2006 compared to 1.1% in the first quarter of 2005, as a result of the
increase in net sales and improvements in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales, despite
the increase in stock-based compensation expense, both of which are discussed above. Our North
American operating margin increased to 1.6% in the first quarter of 2006 from 1.0% in the first
quarter of 2005, reflecting the economies of scale from the higher volume of business, benefits
from our outsourcing and optimization plan, reduction of the related reorganization and
major-program costs (approximately 0.2% of North America net sales in the first quarter of 2005),
the addition of AVAD and ongoing cost containment efforts, partially offset by competitive
pressures on pricing. Our European operating margin decreased to 1.3% in the first quarter of 2006
from 1.4% in the first quarter of 2005, as a result of softer economies of certain European markets
and recent vendor consolidation efforts which exerted pressure on gross margin, partially offset by
a decrease in operating expenses due to ongoing costs containment efforts. Our Asia-Pacific
operating margin increased to 1.0% in the first quarter of 2006 from 0.5% in the first quarter of
2005, reflecting the economies of scale from the higher volume of business, reduction in the
integration costs (approximately 0.3% of Asia-Pacific net sales) and ongoing cost containment
efforts. Our Latin American operating margin increased to 1.9% in the first quarter of 2006 from
1.2% in the first quarter of 2005, reflecting a robust market and continued strengthening of our
business processes in the region. We continue to implement process improvements and other changes
to improve profitability over the long-term. As a result, operating margins and/or sales may
fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.
20
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
Other expense (income) consisted primarily of interest, foreign currency exchange gains and
losses and other non-operating gains and losses. We incurred net other expense of $13.2 million in
the first quarter of 2006 compared to $14.7 million in the first quarter of 2005, primarily
reflecting increases in foreign-exchange gains in Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
Provision for income taxes was $24.0 million, or an effective tax rate of 28%, in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to $19.1 million, or an effective tax rate of 31%, in the first quarter of
2005. The decrease in the estimated annual effective tax rate reflects our ongoing tax strategies
as well as our estimate of the geographic mix of income within the various taxing jurisdictions.
Quarterly Data; Seasonality
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely
continue to do so in the future as a result of:
|
|
seasonal variations in the demand for our products and services such as lower demand in Europe during the summer months,
worldwide pre-holiday stocking in the retail channel during the September-to-December period and the seasonal increase
in demand for our North American fee-based logistics related services in the fourth quarter which affects our operating
expenses and margins; |
|
|
|
competitive conditions in our industry, which may impact the prices charged and terms and conditions imposed by our
suppliers and/or competitors and the prices we charge our customers, which in turn may negatively impact our revenues
and/or gross margins; |
|
|
|
currency fluctuations in countries in which we operate; |
|
|
|
variations in our levels of excess inventory and doubtful accounts, and changes in the terms of vendor-sponsored
programs such as price protection and return rights; |
|
|
|
changes in the level of our operating expenses; |
|
|
|
the impact of acquisitions we may make; |
|
|
|
the impact of and possible disruption caused by reorganization actions and efforts to improve our IT capabilities, as
well as the related expenses and/or charges; |
|
|
|
the loss or consolidation of one or more of our major suppliers or customers; |
|
|
|
product supply constraints; |
|
|
|
interest rate fluctuations, which may increase our borrowing costs and may influence the willingness of customers and
end-users to purchase products and services; and |
|
|
|
general economic or geopolitical conditions. |
These historical variations may not be indicative of future trends in the near term. Our
narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of the foregoing factors on our operating results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
We have financed working capital needs largely through income from operations, available cash,
borrowings under revolving credit and other facilities, and trade and supplier credit. The
following is a detailed discussion of our cash flows for the first quarter of 2006 and 2005.
Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $326.3 million and $324.5 million at April 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively.
Net cash used by operating activities was $13.8 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared
to $139.4 million for the first quarter of 2005. The net cash used by operating activities for the
first quarter of 2006 principally reflects reductions of accounts payable and accrued expenses,
partially offset by our earnings and decreases in our accounts receivable. The reduction in
accounts payable and accounts receivable reflects the lower volume of business compared to year-end
while the reduction of accrued expenses primarily relates to payments of variable incentive
compensation. The net cash used by operating activities in the first quarter of 2005 principally
reflects decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by reductions of
accounts receivable, inventory and other current assets. The reduction of accrued expenses and
other current assets primarily relates to the settlement of a currency interest rate swap and
related collateral deposit, as well as payments of variable compensation. The reductions of
accounts payable, accounts receivable and inventory largely reflect the seasonal decline in sales
during the quarter as well as the timing of vendor payments, which reduced accounts payable at
April 2, 2005 greater than the seasonal decline in sales.
21
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
Net cash used by investing activities was $37.8 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared
to $10.4 million for the first quarter of 2005. The net cash used by investing activities for the first quarter of 2006 was primarily due to earn-out payments related to
acquisitions while the amount in first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $48.4 million for the first quarter of 2006
compared to $21.6 million for the first quarter of 2005. The net cash provided by financing
activities for the first quarter of 2006 primarily reflects the net proceeds of $38.6 million from
our debt facilities and proceeds of $31.3 million from the exercise of stock options, partially
offset by a decrease in our book overdrafts. The net cash provided by financing activities in the
first quarter of 2005 primarily reflects net proceeds of $73.0 million from our debt facilities,
partially offset by a decrease in our book overdrafts.
Capital Resources
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash resources and cash provided
by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with funds available under our credit
arrangements, will provide sufficient resources to meet our present and future working capital and
cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
On-Balance Sheet Capital Resources
We have a revolving accounts receivable-based financing program in the U.S., which provides
for up to $500 million in borrowing capacity secured by substantially all U.S.-based receivables.
At our option, the program may be increased to as much as $600 million at any time prior to July
29, 2006. The interest rate on this facility is dependent on the designated commercial paper rates
plus a predetermined margin at April 1, 2006. This facility expires on March 31, 2008. At April
1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had borrowings of $355.1 million and $304.3 million, respectively, under
our revolving accounts receivable-based financing program.
We have a trade accounts receivable-based financing program in Canada, which matures on August
31, 2008 and provides for borrowing capacity up to 150 million Canadian dollars, or approximately
$128 million at April 1, 2006. The interest rate on this facility is dependent on the designated
commercial paper rates plus a predetermined margin at the drawdown date. At April 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, we had borrowings of $72.8 million and $38.7 million, respectively, under this
trade accounts receivable-based financing program.
We have a revolving trade accounts receivable backed-financing facility in Europe supported by
the trade accounts receivable of a European subsidiary for Euro 107 million, or approximately $130
million at April 1, 2006, with a financial institution that has an arrangement with a related
issuer of third-party commercial paper. This facility matures in July 2007. We also have another
revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing facility in Europe supported by the trade
accounts receivable of another European subsidiary for Euro 230 million, or approximately $279
million at April 1, 2006, with the same financial institution and related issuer of third-party
commercial paper. On January 13, 2006, we extended this facility to January 2009 under the same
terms and conditions. Both of these European facilities require certain commitment fees and
borrowings under both facilities incur financing costs at rates indexed to EURIBOR. At April 1,
2006 and December 31, 2005, we had no borrowings under these European revolving trade accounts
receivable-backed financing facilities.
We have a multi-currency revolving trade accounts receivable-backed financing facility in
Asia-Pacific supported by the trade accounts receivable of two subsidiaries in the region for 250
million Australian dollars, or approximately $179 million at April 1, 2006, with a financial
institution that has an arrangement with a related issuer of third-party commercial paper that
expires in June 2008. The interest rate is dependent upon the currency in which the drawing is
made and is related to the local short-term bank indicator rate for such currency. At April 1,
2006 and December 31, 2005, we had borrowings of $98.9 million and $112.6 million, respectively,
under this facility.
22
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
Our ability to access financing under our North American, European and Asia-Pacific facilities
is dependent upon the level of eligible trade accounts receivable and the level of market demand
for commercial paper. At April 1, 2006, our actual aggregate available capacity under these
programs was approximately $1.1 billion based on eligible accounts receivable outstanding, of which
approximately $527 million of such capacity was outstanding. We could, however, lose access to all
or part of our financing under these facilities under certain circumstances, including: (a) a
reduction in credit ratings of the third-party issuer of commercial paper or the back-up liquidity
providers, if not replaced or (b) failure to meet certain defined eligibility criteria for the
trade accounts receivable, such as receivables must be assignable and free of liens and dispute or
set-off rights. In addition, in certain situations, we could lose access to all or part of our
financing with respect to the European facility that matures in January 2009 as a result of the
rescission of our authorization to collect the receivables by the relevant supplier under
applicable local law. Based on our assessment of the duration of these programs, the history and
strength of the financial partners involved, other historical data, various remedies available to
us under these programs, and the remoteness of such contingencies, we believe that it is unlikely
that any of these risks will materialize in the near term.
We have a three-year $175 million revolving senior unsecured credit facility with a bank
syndicate that matures in December 2008. The interest rate on the new revolving senior unsecured
credit facility is based on LIBOR, plus a predetermined margin that is based on our debt ratings
and our leverage ratio. At April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had no borrowings under this
credit facility. This credit facility may also be used to support letters of credit. At April 1,
2006 and December 31, 2005, letters of credit of $20.7 million and $21.2 million, respectively,
were issued to certain vendors and financial institutions to support purchases by our subsidiaries,
payment of insurance premiums and flooring arrangements. Our available capacity under the
agreement is reduced by the amount of any issued and outstanding letters of credit.
We have a three-year 100 million Australian dollars, or approximately $72 million at April 1,
2006, senior unsecured credit facility with a bank syndicate that matures in December 2008. The
interest rate on this credit facility is based on Australian or New Zealand short-term bank indicator rate, depending on the
funding currency, plus a predetermined margin that is based on our debt ratings and our leverage
ratio. At April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had borrowings of $6.8 million and $14.4
million, respectively, under this credit facility. This credit facility may also be used to
support letters of credit. Our available capacity under the agreement is reduced by the amount of
any issued and outstanding letters of credit. At April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, no letters
of credit were issued.
We also have additional lines of credit, short-term overdraft facilities and other credit
facilities with various financial institutions worldwide, which provide for borrowing capacity
aggregating approximately $602 million at April 1, 2006. Most of these arrangements are on an
uncommitted basis and are reviewed periodically for renewal. At April 1, 2006 and December 31,
2005, we had approximately $110.4 million and $134.8 million, respectively, outstanding under these
facilities. At April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, letters of credit totaling approximately $36.0
million and $53.4 million, respectively, were issued principally to certain vendors to support
purchases by our subsidiaries. The issuance of these letters of credit reduces our available
capacity under these agreements by the same amount. The weighted average interest rate on the
outstanding borrowings under these facilities was 7.3% and 6.1% per annum at April 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Capital Resources
We have a revolving trade accounts receivable-based factoring facility in Europe, which
provides up to approximately $213 million of additional financing capacity. Approximately $109
million of this capacity expires in March 2007 with the balance expiring in December 2007. At
April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had no trade accounts receivable sold to and held by third
parties under our European program. Our financing capacity under the European program is dependent
upon the level of our trade accounts receivable eligible to be transferred or sold into the
accounts receivable financing program. At April 1, 2006, our actual aggregate available capacity
under this program, based on eligible accounts receivable outstanding, was approximately $193
million. We believe that there are sufficient eligible trade accounts receivable to support our
anticipated financing needs under the European accounts receivable financing program.
23
Managements Discussion and Analysis Continued
Covenant Compliance
We are required to comply with certain financial covenants under some of our on-balance sheet
financing facilities, as well as our European off-balance sheet accounts receivable-based factoring
facility, including minimum tangible net worth, restrictions on funded debt and interest coverage
and trade accounts receivable portfolio performance covenants, including metrics related to
receivables and payables. We are also restricted in the amount of additional indebtedness we can
incur, dividends we can pay, as well as the amount of common stock that we can repurchase annually.
At April 1, 2006, we were in compliance with all covenants or other material requirements set
forth in our accounts receivable financing programs and credit agreements or other agreements with
our creditors as discussed above.
Other Matters
See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements and Item 1. Legal Proceedings under Part
II Other Information for discussion of other matters.
Capital Expenditures
We presently expect our capital expenditures not to exceed $50 million in fiscal 2006.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market
risk for first quarter ended April 1, 2006 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. For further discussion of quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk, reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no
change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last
fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
During 2002 and 2003, one of our Latin American subsidiaries was audited by the Brazilian
taxing authorities in relation to certain commercial taxes. As a result of this audit, the
subsidiary received an assessment of 31.1 million Brazilian reais, including interest and penalties
computed through April 1, 2006, or approximately $14.3 million at April 1, 2006, alleging these
commercial taxes were not properly remitted for the subsidiarys purchase of imported software
during the period January through September 2002. The Brazilian taxing authorities may make
similar claims for periods subsequent to September 2002. Additional assessments for periods
subsequent to September 2002, if received, may be significant either individually or in the
aggregate. It is managements opinion, based upon the opinions of outside legal counsel, that we
have valid defenses to the assessment of these taxes on the purchase of imported software for the
2002 period at issue or any subsequent period. Although we are vigorously pursuing administrative
and judicial action to challenge the assessment, no assurance can be given as to the ultimate
outcome. An unfavorable resolution of this matter is not expected to have a material impact on our
financial condition, but depending upon the time period and amounts involved it may have a material
negative effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.
We received an informal inquiry from the SEC during the third quarter of 2004. The SECs
focus to date has been related to certain transactions with McAfee, Inc. (formerly Network
Associates, Inc. or NAI) from 1998 through 2000. We also received subpoenas from the U.S.
Attorneys office for the Northern District of California (Department of Justice) in connection
with its grand jury investigation of NAI, which seek information concerning these transactions. On
January 4, 2006, McAfee and the SEC made public the terms of a settlement they had reached with
respect to McAfee. We continue to cooperate fully with the SEC and the Department of Justice in
their inquiries. We are engaged in discussions with the SEC toward a possible resolution of
matters concerning these NAI-related transactions. We cannot predict with certainty the outcome of
these discussions, nor their timing, nor can we reasonably estimate the amount of any loss or range
of loss that might be incurred as a result of the resolution of these matters with the SEC and the
Department of Justice. Such amounts may be material to our consolidated results of operations or
cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
25
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) |
31.2
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of SOX |
32.1
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of SOX |
32.2
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of SOX |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INGRAM MICRO INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ William D. Humes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
William D. Humes |
|
|
Title:
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and |
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer) |
May 8, 2006
26
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (SOX) |
31.2
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of SOX |
32.1
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of SOX |
32.2
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of SOX |
27