e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-32963
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
11-3776228 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification number) |
|
|
|
One Greenway Plaza |
|
|
Suite 600 |
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
77046 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (832) 615-8600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 3, 2010, there were 27,774,043 Common Units and 525,957 Management Units
outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
568,170 |
|
|
$ |
268,779 |
|
Transportation and other services |
|
|
163,004 |
|
|
|
148,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
731,174 |
|
|
|
416,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas storage services |
|
|
569,737 |
|
|
|
250,676 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
66,583 |
|
|
|
73,900 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,528 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10,835 |
|
|
|
10,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
661,683 |
|
|
|
347,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
69,491 |
|
|
|
68,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(21,656 |
) |
|
|
(17,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(21,501 |
) |
|
|
(17,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before earnings from equity investments |
|
|
47,990 |
|
|
|
51,614 |
|
Earnings from equity investments |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
50,642 |
|
|
|
53,696 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(39,372 |
) |
|
|
(43,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
|
$ |
10,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per partnership unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,154 |
|
|
$ |
37,574 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
134,563 |
|
|
|
124,165 |
|
Construction and pipeline relocation receivables |
|
|
11,420 |
|
|
|
14,095 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
246,230 |
|
|
|
310,214 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
79,084 |
|
|
|
104,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
493,415 |
|
|
|
617,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,234,407 |
|
|
|
2,238,321 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
99,503 |
|
|
|
96,851 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
432,124 |
|
|
|
432,124 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
44,044 |
|
|
|
45,157 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
51,586 |
|
|
|
56,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,355,079 |
|
|
$ |
3,486,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
183,500 |
|
|
$ |
239,800 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
53,670 |
|
|
|
56,723 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
14,665 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
114,393 |
|
|
|
113,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
360,540 |
|
|
|
430,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,441,076 |
|
|
|
1,500,495 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
106,381 |
|
|
|
102,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,907,997 |
|
|
|
2,034,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner (2,830 common units outstanding
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Limited Partners (27,771,213 common units outstanding
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009) |
|
|
236,537 |
|
|
|
236,545 |
|
Management (525,957 units outstanding
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009) |
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,225 |
|
Equity gains on issuance of Buckeye Partners, L.P.
limited partner units |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. capital |
|
|
242,327 |
|
|
|
242,334 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,204,755 |
|
|
|
1,209,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
1,447,082 |
|
|
|
1,452,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital |
|
$ |
3,355,079 |
|
|
$ |
3,486,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,642 |
|
|
$ |
53,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of ESOP shares released |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,528 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
Net changes in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
(19,183 |
) |
|
|
4,103 |
|
Non-cash deferred lease expense |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Earnings from equity investments of Buckeye Partners, L.P. |
|
|
(2,652 |
) |
|
|
(2,082 |
) |
Distributions from equity investments of Buckeye Partners, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Amortization of other non-cash items |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(10,398 |
) |
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
Construction and pipeline relocation receivables |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
3,064 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
73,705 |
|
|
|
26,101 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
26,214 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,053 |
) |
|
|
(11,659 |
) |
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
(18,821 |
) |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments from operating activities |
|
|
93,406 |
|
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
144,048 |
|
|
|
78,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,963 |
) |
|
|
(20,976 |
) |
Net proceeds (expenditures) for disposal of property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
22,174 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
11,211 |
|
|
|
(21,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Buckeye Partners, L.P. limited partner
units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,042 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of Buckeye Partners, L.P. unit options |
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long term-debt |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
Borrowings under credit facilities |
|
|
59,500 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Repayments under credit facilities |
|
|
(117,500 |
) |
|
|
(120,267 |
) |
Net repayments under BES credit agreement |
|
|
(56,300 |
) |
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Distributions paid to noncontrolling partners of Buckeye Partners, L.P. |
|
|
(47,586 |
) |
|
|
(41,925 |
) |
Distributions paid to partners |
|
|
(11,603 |
) |
|
|
(9,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(172,679 |
) |
|
|
(98,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(17,420 |
) |
|
|
(40,334 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of period |
|
|
37,574 |
|
|
|
61,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents End of period |
|
$ |
20,154 |
|
|
$ |
20,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. Unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Buckeyes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Partner Units |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
226,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,037 |
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,774 |
|
|
$ |
1,398,834 |
|
Net income* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,959 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,547 |
|
|
|
53,696 |
|
Distributions paid to partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,164 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,339 |
) |
Recognition of unit-based compensation charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
Equity gains on issuance of Buckeye LP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of 2.6 million of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeyes limited partner units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,042 |
|
|
|
91,042 |
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,925 |
) |
|
|
(41,925 |
) |
Change in value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Investment in Buckeyes limited partner units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
227,718 |
|
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
2,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,259,688 |
|
|
$ |
1,493,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
236,545 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,209,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,452,294 |
|
Net income* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,058 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,372 |
|
|
|
50,642 |
|
Distributions paid to partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,386 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,603 |
) |
Recognition of unit-based compensation charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
Amortization of Buckeyes
limited partner unit options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
Exercise of limited partner unit options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
Services Companys non-cash ESOP distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,586 |
) |
|
|
(47,586 |
) |
Change in value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,928 |
) |
|
|
(1,928 |
) |
Investment in Buckeyes limited partner units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
236,537 |
|
|
$ |
3,226 |
|
|
$ |
2,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,447,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Comprehensive income equals net income. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Except for per unit amounts, or as otherwise noted within the context of each footnote
disclosure, the dollar amounts presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are
stated in thousands.
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Partnership Organization
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware master limited partnership (MLP), the
common units (Common Units) of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the
ticker symbol BGH. We were organized on June 15, 2006 and own 100% of Buckeye GP LLC (Buckeye
GP), which is the general partner of Buckeye Partners, L.P. (Buckeye). Buckeye is also a
publicly traded Delaware MLP which was organized in 1986, and its limited partner units (LP
Units) are separately traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol BPL. Approximately 62% of our
outstanding equity, which includes Common Units and management units (Management Units), are
owned by BGH GP Holdings, LLC (BGH GP) and approximately 38% by the public. BGH GP is owned by
affiliates of ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC (ArcLight), Kelso & Company (Kelso), and certain
investment funds along with certain members of senior management of Buckeye GP. MainLine
Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (MainLine Management), is our general
partner and is wholly owned by BGH GP. As used in these Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, us, our, or
BGH are intended to mean the business and operations of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. on a
consolidated basis, including those of Buckeye. References to Buckeye mean Buckeye Partners, L.P.
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Our only business is the ownership of Buckeye GP. Buckeye GPs only business is the
management of Buckeye and its subsidiaries. At March 31, 2010, Buckeye GP owned an approximate
0.5% general partner interest in Buckeye.
Buckeye was formed in 1986 and owns and operates one of the largest independent refined
petroleum products pipeline systems in the United States in terms of volumes delivered with
approximately 5,400 miles of pipeline and 67 active products terminals that provide aggregate
storage capacity of approximately 27.2 million barrels. In addition, Buckeye operates and maintains
approximately 2,400 miles of other pipelines under agreements with major oil and gas, petrochemical
and chemical companies, and performs certain engineering and construction management services for
third parties. Buckeye also owns and operates a major natural gas storage facility in northern
California, and is a wholesale distributor of refined petroleum products in the United States in
areas also served by its pipelines and terminals. We, through Buckeye, operate and report in five
business segments: Pipeline Operations; Terminalling & Storage; Natural Gas Storage; Energy
Services; and Development & Logistics.
Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company (Services Company) was formed in 1996 in connection with
the establishment of the Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the
ESOP). At March 31, 2010, Services Company owned approximately 3.0% of Buckeyes LP Units.
Services Company employees provide services to Buckeyes operating subsidiaries. Pursuant to a
services agreement entered into in December 2004 (the Services Agreement), Buckeyes operating
subsidiaries reimburse Services Company for the costs of the services provided by Services Company.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
that are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal and recurring nature and necessary for a
fair statement of our financial position as of March 31, 2010, and the results of our operations
and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results of our operations for the 2010 fiscal
year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We have eliminated
all intercompany transactions in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements also include
the accounts of wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as the accounts of Buckeye and Services Company,
on a
6
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
consolidated basis. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. These interim financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC on March 2,
2010.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to the current-year
presentation. The reclassifications in the condensed consolidated statements of operations are as
follows:
|
|
|
Earnings from equity investments are now presented on a separate line item in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The other investment income that had previously been included with earnings from
equity investments has been reclassified and included in Other income in the 2009
period. |
The reclassifications in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows:
|
|
|
We have separately disclosed cash flows from the issuance of long-term debt and
borrowings under our credit facilities for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
These amounts had been included within the same line item in the 2009 period. |
These reclassifications had no impact on net income or cash flows from operating, investing or
financing activities.
Recent Accounting Developments
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). In June 2009, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended consolidation guidance for VIEs. The objective of this
new guidance is to improve financial reporting by companies involved with VIEs. This guidance
requires each reporting company to perform an analysis to determine whether the companys variable
interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a VIE. The new guidance is
effective as of the beginning of each reporting companys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. This guidance was effective for us on January 1,
2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Fair Value Measurements. In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires new
disclosures related to fair value measurements. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures
related to transfers between Level 1 and 2 activities and a gross presentation for Level 3
activity. The new accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the new disclosures related to Level 3 activities, which are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those
years. The new guidance became effective for us on January 1, 2010, except for the new disclosures
related to Level 3 activities, which will be effective for us on January 1, 2011. We have included
the enhanced disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements in Note 12.
2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION
Refined Petroleum Products Terminals and Pipeline Assets Acquisition
On November 18, 2009, we acquired from ConocoPhillips certain refined petroleum product
terminals and pipeline assets for approximately $47.1 million in cash. In addition, we acquired
certain inventory on hand upon completion of the transaction for additional consideration of $7.3
million. The assets include over 300 miles of
7
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
active pipeline that provide connectivity between
the East St. Louis, Illinois and East Chicago, Indiana markets and three terminals providing 2.3
million barrels of storage tankage. ConocoPhillips entered into certain commercial contracts with
us concurrent with our acquisition regarding usage of the acquired facilities. We believe the
acquisition of these assets has given us greater access to markets and refinery operations in the
Midwest and
increased the commercial value of these assets and certain of our existing assets to our customers
by offering enhanced distribution connectivity and flexible storage capabilities. The operations
of these acquired assets are reported in the Pipeline Operations and Terminalling & Storage
segments. The purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
7,287 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
44,400 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
4,580 |
|
Environmental and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allocated purchase price |
|
$ |
54,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Buckeye NGL Pipeline
Effective January 1, 2010, we sold our ownership interest in an approximately 350 mile natural
gas liquids pipeline (the Buckeye NGL Pipeline) that runs from Wattenberg, Colorado to Bushton,
Kansas for $22.0 million. The assets had been classified as Assets held for sale in our
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 with a carrying amount equal to the proceeds
received. Revenues for Buckeye NGL Pipeline for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $3.3
million.
3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Claims and Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various claims and legal proceedings,
some of which are covered by insurance. We are generally unable to predict the timing or outcome
of these claims and proceedings. Based upon our evaluation of existing claims and proceedings and
the probability of losses relating to such contingencies, we have accrued certain amounts relating
to such claims and proceedings, none of which are considered material.
In April 2010, the Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) proposed
penalties totaling approximately $0.5 million in connection with a tank overfill incident that
occurred at our facility in East Chicago, Indiana, in May 2005 and other related personnel
qualification issues raised as a result of PHMSAs 2008 Integrity Inspection. We plan on
contesting the proposed penalty. The timing or outcome of this appeal cannot reasonably be
determined at this time.
Environmental Contingencies
In accordance with our accounting policy, we recorded operating expenses, net of insurance
recoveries, of $2.8 million and $5.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, related to environmental expenditures unrelated to claims and proceedings.
Ammonia Contract Contingencies
On November 30, 2005, Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipe Lines, L.P. (BGC) purchased an ammonia
pipeline and other assets from El Paso Merchant Energy-Petroleum Company (EPME), a subsidiary of
El Paso Corporation (El Paso). As part of the transaction, BGC assumed the obligations of EPME
under several contracts involving monthly purchases and sales of ammonia. EPME and BGC agreed,
however, that EPME would retain the economic risks and benefits associated with those contracts
until their expiration at the end of 2012. To effectuate this
8
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
agreement, BGC passes through to
EPME both the cost of purchasing ammonia under a supply contract and the proceeds from selling
ammonia under three sales contracts. For the vast majority of monthly periods since the closing of
the pipeline acquisition, the pricing terms of the ammonia contracts have resulted in ammonia costs
exceeding ammonia sales proceeds. The amount of the shortfall generally increases as the
market price of ammonia increases.
EPME has informed BGC that, notwithstanding the parties agreement, it will not continue to
pay BGC for shortfalls created by the pass-through of ammonia costs in excess of ammonia revenues.
EPME encouraged BGC to seek payment by invoking a $40.0 million guaranty made by El Paso which
guaranteed EPMEs obligations to BGC. If EPME fails to reimburse BGC for these shortfalls for a
significant period during the remainder of the term of the ammonia agreements, then such
unreimbursed shortfalls could exceed the $40.0 million cap on El Pasos guaranty. To the extent
the unreimbursed shortfalls significantly exceed the $40.0 million cap, the resulting costs
incurred by BGC could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. To date, BGC has continued to receive payment for ammonia costs under the contracts at
issue. BGC has not called on El Pasos guaranty and believes only BGC may invoke the guaranty.
EPME, however, contends that El Pasos guaranty is the source of payment for the shortfalls, but
has not clarified the extent to which it believes the guaranty has been exhausted. We have been
working with EPME to terminate the ammonia sales contracts and ammonia supply contracts and, at no
cost to us, have terminated one of the ammonia sales contracts. Given, however, the uncertainty of
future ammonia prices and EPMEs future actions, we continue to believe we have risk of loss and,
at this time, are unable to estimate the amount of any such losses we might incur in the future. We
are assessing our options in the event that we and EPME are unable to terminate the remaining
contracts or otherwise mitigate the remaining risk, including potential recourse against EPME and
El Paso, with respect to this matter.
Customer Bankruptcy
One of our customers filed for bankruptcy in October 2009 and, since such filing, has not
paid any amounts due to us pursuant a contract under which approximately $4.2 million remains
payable. At this time, we are unable to estimate the impact of the bankruptcy on amounts payable
to us.
4. INVENTORIES
Our inventory amounts were as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Refined petroleum products (1) |
|
$ |
235,696 |
|
|
$ |
299,473 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
10,534 |
|
|
|
10,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
246,230 |
|
|
$ |
310,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ending inventory was 109.3 million and 141.7 million gallons of refined petroleum
products at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. |
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 93% and 99%, respectively, of our
inventory was hedged. Hedged inventory is valued at current market prices with the change in value
of the inventory reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
9
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. PREPAID AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
|
Prepaid and other current assets consist of the following at the dates indicated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Prepaid insurance |
|
$ |
5,013 |
|
|
$ |
7,088 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
13,544 |
|
Ammonia receivable |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
7,429 |
|
Margin deposits |
|
|
5,731 |
|
|
|
21,037 |
|
Prepaid services |
|
|
21,267 |
|
|
|
21,571 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
13,201 |
|
Tax receivable |
|
|
7,162 |
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
Other |
|
|
12,645 |
|
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid and other current assets |
|
$ |
79,084 |
|
|
$ |
104,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. EQUITY INVESTMENTS
We own interests in related businesses that are accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. The following table presents our equity investments, all included within the Pipeline
Operations segment, at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Muskegon Pipeline LLC |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
$ |
15,617 |
|
|
$ |
15,273 |
|
Transport4, LLC |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
West Shore Pipe Line Company |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
31,526 |
|
|
|
30,320 |
|
West Texas LPG Pipeline Limited Partnership |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
51,942 |
|
|
|
50,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,503 |
|
|
$ |
96,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents earnings from equity investments for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Muskegon Pipeline LLC |
|
$ |
344 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
Transport4, LLC |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
West Shore Pipe Line Company |
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
West Texas LPG Pipeline Limited Partnership |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from equity investments |
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
|
$ |
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Combined income statement data for the periods indicated for our equity method investments is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
31,545 |
|
|
$ |
31,567 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
15,901 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
Non-operating expense |
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
Net income |
|
|
12,067 |
|
|
|
12,624 |
|
7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
38,300 |
|
|
$ |
38,300 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(6,373 |
) |
|
|
(5,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
32,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts |
|
|
16,380 |
|
|
|
16,380 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
12,117 |
|
|
|
12,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
44,044 |
|
|
$ |
45,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, amortization expense related to intangible
assets was $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible
assets is expected to be approximately $4.5 million for each of the next five years.
8. OTHER NON CURRENT ASSETS
|
Other non current assets consist of the following at the dates indicated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Prepaid services |
|
$ |
8,799 |
|
|
$ |
11,640 |
|
Long-term derivative assets |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
10,123 |
|
|
|
11,058 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,707 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current assets |
|
$ |
51,586 |
|
|
$ |
56,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. ACCRUED AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued and other current liabilities consist of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Taxes-other than income |
|
$ |
18,880 |
|
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
Accrued employee benefit liability |
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
Environmental liabilities |
|
|
10,746 |
|
|
|
10,799 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
18,572 |
|
|
|
30,613 |
|
Payable for ammonia purchase |
|
|
7,056 |
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
18,501 |
|
|
|
6,829 |
|
Compensation and vacation |
|
|
6,886 |
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
Reorganization |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
Deferred consideration |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,345 |
|
|
|
22,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
114,393 |
|
|
$ |
113,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Long-term debt consists of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
BGH: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BGH Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Services Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.60% ESOP Notes due March 28, 2011 |
|
|
6,204 |
|
|
|
7,790 |
|
Retirement premium |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Buckeye: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.625% Notes due July 15, 2013 (1) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
5.300% Notes due October 15, 2014 (1) |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
5.125% Notes due July 1, 2017 (1) |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
6.050% Notes due January 15, 2018 (1) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
5.500% Notes due August 15, 2019 (1) |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
6.750% Notes due August 15, 2033 (1) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
BES Credit Agreement |
|
|
183,500 |
|
|
|
239,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,634,646 |
|
|
|
1,750,503 |
|
Other, including unamortized discounts and fair value hedges |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
|
(4,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal debt |
|
|
1,630,722 |
|
|
|
1,746,473 |
|
Less:
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(189,646 |
) |
|
|
(245,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,441,076 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We make semi-annual interest payments on these notes based on the rates noted above
with the principal balances outstanding to be paid on or before the due dates as shown
above. |
12
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The fair values of our aggregate debt and credit facilities were estimated to be $1,683.5
million and $1,769.8 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The fair
values of the fixed-rate debt were estimated by observing market trading prices and by comparing
the historic market prices of our publicly-issued debt with the market prices of other MLPs
publicly-issued debt with similar credit ratings and terms. The fair
values of the variable-rate
debt are their carrying amounts, as the carrying amount reasonably approximates fair value due to
the variability of the interest rates.
BGH
We
have a five-year, $10.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with SunTrust Bank, as
both administrative agent and lender (the BGH Credit Agreement). The BGH Credit Agreement may be
used for working capital and other partnership purposes. We have pledged all of the limited
liability company interests in Buckeye GP as security for our obligations under the BGH Credit
Agreement. Borrowings under the BGH Credit Agreement bear interest under one of two rate options,
selected by us, equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (b)
SunTrust Banks prime commercial lending rate; or (ii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR),
plus a margin which can range from 0.40% to 1.40%, based on the ratings assigned by Standard &
Poors Rating Services and Moodys Investor Service to our
senior unsecured non-credit enhanced
long-term debt. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no amounts outstanding under
the BGH Credit Agreement.
The BGH Credit Agreement requires us to maintain leverage and funded debt coverage ratios. The
leverage ratio covenant requires us to maintain, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, a ratio
of the total funded indebtedness of us and our Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined below), measured
as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, to the aggregate dividends and distributions received by
us and the Restricted Subsidiaries from Buckeye, plus all other cash received by us and the
Restricted Subsidiaries, measured for the preceding twelve months, less expenses, of not more than
2.50 to 1.00. The BGH Credit Agreement defines Restricted Subsidiaries as certain of our wholly
owned subsidiaries. The funded debt coverage ratio covenant requires us to maintain, as of the
last day of each fiscal quarter, a ratio of us and all of our consolidated subsidiaries total
consolidated funded debt to the consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the BGH Credit Agreement, of us
and all of our subsidiaries, measured for the preceding twelve months, of not more than 5.25 to
1.00, subject to a provision for increases to 5.75 to 1.00 in connection with future acquisitions.
At March 31, 2010, our funded debt coverage ratio was 4.78 to 1.00.
The BGH Credit Agreement contains other covenants that prohibit us from taking certain
actions, including but not limited to, declaring dividends or distributions if any default or event
of default has occurred or would result from such a declaration and limiting our ability to incur
additional indebtedness, creating negative pledges and granting certain liens, making certain
loans, acquisitions, and investments, making material changes to the nature of us and our
Restricted Subsidiaries business, and entering into a merger, consolidation, or sale of assets.
At March 31, 2010, we were not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the covenants under the
BGH Credit Agreement.
Services Company ESOP Notes
Services Company had total debt outstanding of $6.1 million and $7.7 million at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, consisting of 3.60% Senior Secured Notes (the 3.60% ESOP
Notes) due March 28, 2011 payable by the ESOP to a third-party lender. The 3.60% ESOP Notes were
issued on May 4, 2004. The 3.60% ESOP Notes are collateralized by Services Companys common stock
and are guaranteed by Services Company. In addition, Buckeye has committed that, in the event that
the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company falls below 125% of the balance payable
under the 3.60% ESOP Notes, Buckeye will fund an escrow account with sufficient assets to bring the
value of the total collateral (the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company and the
escrow account) up to the 125% minimum. Amounts deposited in the escrow account are returned to
Buckeye when the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company returns to an amount that
exceeds the 125% minimum. At March 31, 2010, the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services
Company exceeded the 125% requirement.
13
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Credit Facility
Buckeye has a borrowing capacity of $580.0 million under an unsecured revolving credit
agreement (the Credit Facility) with SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent, which may be
expanded up to $780.0 million subject to certain conditions and upon the further approval of the
lenders. The Credit Facilitys maturity date is August 24, 2012, which Buckeye may extend for up
to two additional one-year periods. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest under one
of two rate options, selected by Buckeye, equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the federal funds
rate plus 0.5% and (b) SunTrust Banks prime rate plus an applicable margin, or (ii) LIBOR plus an
applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined based on the current utilization level of
the Credit Facility and ratings assigned by Standard & Poors Rating Services and Moodys Investor
Service for Buckeyes senior unsecured non-credit enhanced long-term debt. At March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, $20.0 million and $78.0 million, respectively, were outstanding under the Credit
Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility
was 0.6% at March 31, 2010.
The Credit Facility requires Buckeye to maintain a specified ratio (the Funded Debt Ratio)
of no greater than 5.00 to 1.00 subject to a provision that allows for increases to 5.50 to 1.00 in
connection with certain future acquisitions. The Funded Debt Ratio is calculated by dividing
consolidated debt by annualized EBITDA, which is defined in the Credit Facility as earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, in each case excluding the income of
certain of Buckeyes majority-owned subsidiaries and equity investments (but including
distributions from those majority-owned subsidiaries and equity investments). At March 31, 2010,
Buckeyes Funded Debt Ratio was approximately 4.29 to 1.00. As permitted by the Credit Facility,
the $183.5 million of borrowings by Buckeye Energy Services LLC (BES) under its separate credit
agreement (discussed below) were excluded from the calculation of the Funded Debt Ratio.
In addition, the Credit Facility contains other covenants including, but not limited to,
covenants limiting Buckeyes ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create or incur liens on
its property, to dispose of property material to its operations, and to consolidate, merge or
transfer assets. At March 31, 2010, we were not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the
covenants under Buckeyes Credit Facility.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Buckeye had committed $1.4 million in support of
letters of credit. The obligations for letters of credit are not reflected as debt on our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
BES Credit Agreement
BES has a credit agreement (the BES Credit Agreement) that provides for borrowings of up to
$250.0 million. The BES Credit Agreements maturity date is May 20, 2011. Under the BES Credit
Agreement, borrowings accrue interest under one of three rate options, at BESs election, equal to
(i) the Administrative Agents Cost of Funds (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 1.75%,
(ii) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 1.75% or (iii) the Base Rate
(as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 0.25%. The BES Credit Agreement also permits
Daylight Overdraft Loans (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement), Swingline Loans (as defined in
the BES Credit Agreement) and letters of credit. Such alternative extensions of credit are subject
to certain conditions as specified in the BES Credit Agreement. The BES Credit Agreement is
secured by liens on certain assets of BES, including its inventory, cash deposits (other than
certain accounts), investments and hedging accounts, receivables and intangibles.
14
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The balances outstanding under the BES Credit Agreement were approximately $183.5 million and
$239.8 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, both of which were classified
as current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The BES Credit Agreement
requires BES to meet certain financial covenants, which are defined in the BES Credit Agreement and
summarized below (in millions, except for the leverage ratio):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
Minimum |
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
outstanding on |
|
Consolidated Tangible |
|
Consolidated Net |
|
Consolidated |
BES Credit Agreement |
|
Net Worth |
|
Working Capital |
|
Leverage Ratio |
$150
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
7.0 to 1.0 |
Above $150 up to $200
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
7.0 to 1.0 |
Above $200 up to $250
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
7.0 to 1.0 |
At March 31, 2010, BESs Consolidated Tangible Net Worth and Consolidated Net Working Capital
were $122.3 million and $75.0 million, respectively, and the Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 2.1 to
1.0. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the BES Credit Agreement
was 2.0% at March 31, 2010.
In addition, the BES Credit Agreement contains other covenants, including, but not limited to,
covenants limiting BESs ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create or incur certain liens
on its property, to consolidate, merge or transfer its assets, to make dividends or distributions,
to dispose of its property, to make investments, to modify its risk management policy, or to engage
in business activities materially different from those presently conducted. At March 31, 2010, we
were not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the covenants under the BES Credit Agreement.
11. OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other non-current liabilities consist of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued employee benefit liabilities (see Note 13) |
|
$ |
44,772 |
|
|
$ |
45,837 |
|
Accrued environmental liabilities |
|
|
18,687 |
|
|
|
19,053 |
|
Deferred consideration |
|
|
17,923 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
9,158 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
8,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
106,381 |
|
|
$ |
102,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS, HEDGING ACTIVITIES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We are exposed to certain risks, including changes in interest rates and commodity prices in
the course of our normal business operations. We use derivative instruments to manage risks
associated with certain identifiable and anticipated transactions. Derivatives are financial
instruments whose fair value is determined by changes in a specified benchmark such as interest
rates or commodity prices. Typical derivative instruments include futures, forward contracts,
swaps and other instruments with similar characteristics. We have no trading derivative
instruments and do not engage in hedging activity with respect to trading instruments.
Our policy is to formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged
items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. This
process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged transaction, the
nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instruments effectiveness will be assessed.
Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we
15
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
assess whether the derivatives used
in a transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or the fair value of
hedged items. A discussion of our derivative activities by risk category follows.
Interest Rate Derivatives
Buckeye utilizes forward-starting interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk related to
forecasted interest payments on anticipated debt issuances. This strategy is a component in
controlling its cost of capital associated with such borrowings. When entering into interest rate
swap transactions, Buckeye becomes exposed to both credit risk and market risk. Buckeye is subject
to credit risk when the value of the swap transaction is positive and the risk exists that the
counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the contract. Buckeye is subject to market
risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value
of the swaps. Buckeye manages its credit risk by only entering into swap transactions with major
financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings. Buckeye manages its market risk by
associating each swap transaction with an existing debt obligation or a specified expected debt
issuance generally associated with the maturity of an existing debt obligation.
Buckeyes practice with respect to derivative transactions related to interest rate risk has
been to have each transaction in connection with non routine borrowings authorized by the Board of
Directors of Buckeye GP. In January 2009, Buckeye GPs Board of Directors adopted an interest rate
hedging policy which permits Buckeye to enter into certain short-term interest rate swap agreements
to manage its interest rate and cash flow risks associated with its Credit Facility. In addition,
in July 2009, Buckeye GPs Board of Directors authorized Buckeye to enter into certain
transactions, such as forward-starting interest rate swaps, to manage its interest rate and cash
flow risks related to certain expected debt issuances associated with the maturity of an existing
debt-obligation.
Buckeye expects to issue new fixed rate debt (i) on or before July 15, 2013, to repay the
$300.0 million of 4.625% Notes that are due on July 15, 2013, and (ii) on or before October 15,
2014, to repay the $275.0 million of 5.300% Notes that are due on October 15, 2014, although no
assurances can be given that the issuance of fixed rate debt will be possible on acceptable terms.
During 2009, Buckeye entered into four forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total aggregate
notional amount of $200.0 million related to the anticipated issuance of debt on or before July 15,
2013 and three forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total aggregate notional amount of
$150.0 million related to the anticipated issuance of debt on or before October 15, 2014. The
purpose of these swaps is to hedge the variability of the forecasted interest payments on these
expected debt issuances that may result from changes in the benchmark interest rate until the
expected debt is issued. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, unrealized losses of $1.3
million were recorded in Buckeyes accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to reflect the
change in the fair values of the forward-starting interest rate swaps. Buckeye designated the swap
agreements as cash flow hedges at inception and expects the changes in values to be highly
correlated with the changes in value of the underlying borrowings.
Over the next twelve months, Buckeye expects to reclassify $1.0 million of accumulated other
comprehensive loss as an increase to interest expense that was generated by terminated
forward-starting interest rate swaps in 2008 associated with its 6.050% Notes.
Commodity Derivatives
Our Energy Services segment primarily uses exchange-traded refined petroleum product futures
contracts to manage the risk of market price volatility on its refined petroleum product
inventories and its fixed-price sales contracts. The derivative contracts used to hedge refined
petroleum product inventories are designated as fair value hedges. Accordingly, our method of
measuring ineffectiveness compares the change in the fair value of New York Mercantile Exchange
(NYMEX) futures contracts to the change in fair value of our hedged fuel inventory. Hedge
accounting is discontinued when the hedged fuel inventory is sold or when the related derivative
contracts expire. In addition, we periodically enter into offsetting exchange-traded futures
contracts to economically close-out an existing futures contract based on a near-term expectation
to sell a portion of our fuel inventory. These offsetting
derivative contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and any resulting gains or
losses are recognized in
16
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
earnings during the period. Presentations of futures contracts for
inventory designated as hedging instruments in the following tables have been presented net of
these offsetting futures contracts.
Our Energy Services segment has not used hedge accounting with respect to its fixed-price
sales contracts. Therefore, our fixed-price sales contracts and the related futures contracts used
to offset those fixed-price sales contracts are all marked-to-market on the consolidated balance
sheets with gains and losses being recognized in earnings during the period.
In order to hedge the cost of natural gas used to operate our turbine engines at our Linden,
New Jersey location, our Pipeline Operations segment bought natural gas futures contracts in March
2009 with terms that coincide with the remaining term of an ongoing natural gas supply contract
(January 2010 through July 2011). We designated the futures contract as a cash flow hedge at
inception.
The following table summarizes our commodity derivative instruments outstanding at March 31,
2010 (amounts in thousands of gallons, except as noted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (1) |
|
|
Accounting |
|
Derivative Purpose |
|
Current |
|
|
Long-Term(2) |
|
|
Treatment |
|
Derivatives NOT designated as hedging
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
18,417 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
Mark-to-market |
Futures contracts for fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
11,844 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
Mark-to-market |
Futures contracts for inventory |
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts for inventory |
|
|
90,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hedge |
Futures contracts for natural gas (BBtu) (3) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
Cash Flow Hedge |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Volume represents net notional position. |
|
(2) |
|
The maximum term for derivatives included in the long-term column is August 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
BBtu represents one billion British thermal units. |
17
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table sets forth the fair value of each classification of derivative instruments
at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
(Liabilities) |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
(Liabilities) |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
(1,217 |
) |
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
$ |
(3,662 |
) |
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
Futures contracts for fixed-price
sales contracts |
|
|
4,817 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
7,210 |
|
Futures contracts for inventory |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts for inventory |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
(7,616 |
) |
|
|
(6,339 |
) |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
(20,517 |
) |
|
|
(18,525 |
) |
Futures contracts for natural gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Balance Sheet Locations: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
(2,831 |
) |
|
|
(14,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,033 |
|
|
$ |
7,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the unrealized net loss of $6.0 million at March 31, 2010 for
inventory hedges represented by futures contracts will be realized by the second quarter of 2010 as
the related inventory is sold. Gains recorded on inventory hedges that were ineffective were
approximately $4.8 million and $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. At March 31, 2010, open refined petroleum product derivative contracts (represented
by the fixed-price sales contracts and futures contracts for fixed-price sales contracts noted
above) varied in duration, but did not extend beyond May 2011. In addition, at March 31, 2010, we
had refined petroleum product inventories which we intend to use to satisfy a portion of the
fixed-price sales contracts.
18
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The gains and losses on our derivative instruments recognized in income on our derivatives
were as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts
|
|
Product sales
|
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
$ |
13,295 |
|
Futures contracts for
fixed-price sales contracts
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas
storage services
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(7,546 |
) |
Futures contracts for inventory
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas
storage services
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts for inventory
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas
storage services
|
|
$ |
(4,910 |
) |
|
$ |
27,648 |
|
The gains and losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to
income and the change in value recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) on our derivatives
were as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
AOCI to Income |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts for natural gas
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas
storage services
|
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Value Recognized |
|
|
in OCI on Derivatives |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts for natural gas |
|
$ |
(696 |
) |
|
$ |
116 |
|
Futures contracts for refined petroleum products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
19
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at a specified measurement date.
Our fair value estimates are based on either (i) actual market data or (ii) assumptions that other
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including estimates of risk.
Recognized valuation techniques employ inputs such as product prices, operating costs, discount
factors and business growth rates. These inputs may be either readily observable, corroborated by
market data or generally unobservable. In developing our estimates of fair value, we endeavor to
utilize the best information available and apply market-based data to the extent possible.
Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques (such as the income or market approach) that maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
A three-tier hierarchy has been established that classifies fair value amounts recognized or
disclosed in the financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such
fair values. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on observable inputs (Levels 1 and
2) to be more reliable and predictable than those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3).
At each balance sheet reporting date, we categorize our financial assets and liabilities using
this hierarchy. The characteristics of fair value amounts classified within each level of the
hierarchy are described as follows.
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are based on quoted prices, which are available in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are defined
as those in which transactions for identical assets or liabilities occur with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are based on pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active
markets and are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date.
Level 2 fair values include instruments that are valued using financial models or other
appropriate valuation methodologies and include the following: |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Inputs that are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data
by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs
are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any,
market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Unobservable
inputs reflect the reporting entitys own ideas about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability (including assumptions about
risk). Unobservable inputs are based on the best information available in the
circumstances, which might include the reporting entitys internally developed data.
The reporting entity must not ignore information about market participant assumptions
that is reasonably available without undue cost and effort. Level 3 inputs are
typically used in connection with internally developed valuation methodologies where
management makes its best estimate of an instruments fair value. |
20
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recurring
The following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities, measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, as of the measurement dates, March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the basis
for that measurement, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
Futures contracts for inventory
and fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset held in trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,662 |
) |
Futures contracts for inventory
and fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,556 |
) |
|
$ |
16,589 |
|
|
$ |
(9,210 |
) |
|
$ |
18,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value of the Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities were based on quoted market prices
obtained from the NYMEX. The value of the Level 1 asset held in trust was obtained from quoted
market prices. The value of the Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities were based on observable
market data related to the obligations to provide petroleum products. The value of the Level 2
interest rate derivative was based on observable market data related to similar obligations.
The Level 2 derivative assets of $1.9 million and $5.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, are each net of a credit valuation adjustment (CVA) of ($0.9)
million. Because few of the Energy Services segments customers entering into these fixed-price
sales contracts are large organizations with nationally-recognized credit ratings, the Energy
Services segment determined that a CVA, which is based on the credit risk of such contracts, is
appropriate. The CVA is based on the historical and expected payment history of each customer, the
amount of product contracted for under the agreement, and the customers historical and expected
purchase performance under each contract.
Non-Recurring
Certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence
of possible impairment. There were no fair value adjustments for such assets or liabilities
reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
21
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Services Company, which employs the majority of our workforce, sponsors a retirement income
guarantee plan (RIGP), which is a defined benefit plan that generally guarantees employees hired
before January 1, 1986 a retirement benefit based on years of service and the employees highest
compensation for any consecutive 5-year period during the last 10 years of service or other
compensation measures as defined under the respective plan provisions. The retirement benefit is
subject to reduction at varying percentages for certain offsetting amounts, including benefits
payable under a retirement and savings plan discussed further below. Services Company funds the
plan through contributions to pension trust assets, generally subject to minimum funding
requirements as provided by applicable law.
Services Company also sponsors an unfunded post-retirement benefit plan (the Retiree Medical
Plan), which provides health care and life insurance benefits to certain of its retirees. To be
eligible for these benefits, an employee must have been hired prior to January 1, 1991 and meet
certain service requirements.
The components of the net periodic benefit cost for the RIGP and Retiree Medical Plan were as
follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIGP |
|
|
Retiree Medical Plan |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(860 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized losses |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs |
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we contributed $1.5 million to the RIGP.
14. UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
We have Management Units and a GP Equity Compensation Plan. Buckeye awards unit-based
compensation to employees and directors primarily under the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan of
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Buckeye LTIP), which became effective in March 2009. Buckeye
formerly awarded options to acquire LP Units to employees pursuant to the Unit Option and
Distribution Equivalent Plan (the Option Plan). We recognized total unit-based compensation
expense of $0.9 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, related to the Buckeye LTIP and the Option Plan. Compensation expense recorded with
respect to the override units was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
22
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BGH GPs Override Units
No override units were granted or forfeited during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
following is a summary of the activity of the override units as of March 31, 2010 (units in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Override Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
Value A Units |
|
|
Value B Units |
|
|
Operating Units |
|
|
Units Awarded |
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
4,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Costs for Override Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value A Units |
|
|
Value B Units |
|
|
Operating Units |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
Total fair value of all outstanding override units |
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
|
$ |
5,808 |
|
|
$ |
11,574 |
|
Less: Expense recorded from plan inception to
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,666 |
) |
|
|
(3,666 |
) |
|
|
|
Estimated future compensation costs at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
|
$ |
2,142 |
|
|
$ |
7,908 |
|
|
|
|
Buckeyes Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Buckeye LTIP provides for the issuance of up to 1,500,000 LP Units, subject to certain
adjustments. After giving effect to the issuance or forfeiture of phantom unit and performance
unit awards through March 31, 2010, a total of 1,114,277 additional LP Units could be issued under
the Buckeye LTIP.
On December 16, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the terms of the Buckeye Partners,
L.P. Unit Deferral and Incentive Plan (Deferral Plan). The Compensation Committee is expressly
authorized to adopt the Deferral Plan under the terms of the Buckeye LTIP, which grants the
Compensation Committee the authority to establish a program pursuant to which Buckeyes phantom
units may be awarded in lieu of cash compensation at the election of the employee. At December 31,
2009, eligible employees were allowed to defer up to 50% of their 2009 compensation award under
Buckeyes Annual Incentive Compensation Plan or other discretionary bonus program in exchange for
grants of phantom units equal in value to the amount of their cash award deferral (each such unit,
a Deferral Unit). Participants also receive one matching phantom unit for each Deferral Unit.
Approximately $1.8 million of 2009 compensation awards had been deferred at December 31, 2009, for
which 62,332 phantom units (including matching units) were granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2010. These grants are included as granted in the Buckeye LTIP activity table below.
Awards under the Buckeye LTIP
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Compensation Committee granted 119,691
phantom units to employees (including the 62,332 phantom units granted pursuant to the Deferral
Plan discussed above), 12,000 phantom units to independent directors of Buckeye GP and MainLine
Management, and 114,725 performance units to employees. The amount paid with respect to phantom
unit distributions under the Buckeye LTIP was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010.
23
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table sets forth the Buckeye LTIP activity for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LP Units |
|
|
per LP Unit (1) |
|
|
Total Value |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
140,095 |
|
|
$ |
39.81 |
|
|
$ |
5,577 |
|
Granted |
|
|
246,416 |
|
|
|
56.42 |
|
|
|
13,903 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
39.06 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
385,204 |
|
|
$ |
50.44 |
|
|
$ |
19,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Determined by dividing the aggregate grant date fair value of awards by the number of
awards issued. The weighted-average grant date fair value per LP Unit for forfeited and
vested awards is determined before an allowance for forfeitures. |
At March 31, 2010, approximately $14.5 million of compensation expense related to the Buckeye
LTIP is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.3 years.
Buckeyes Unit Option and Distribution Equivalent Plan
Buckeye also sponsors the Option Plan, pursuant to which it historically granted options to
employees to purchase LP Units at the market price of its LP Units on the date of grant.
Generally, the options vest three years from the date of grant and expire ten years from the date
of grant. As unit options are exercised, Buckeye issues new LP Units to the holder. Buckeye has
not historically repurchased, and does not expect to repurchase in 2010, any of its LP Units.
The impact of Buckeyes Option Plan is immaterial to our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Approximately 62% of our outstanding equity, which includes Common Units and Management Units,
are owned by BGH GP and approximately 38% by the public. BGH GP is owned by affiliates of
ArcLight, Kelso and certain investment funds along with certain members of senior management of
Buckeye GP. MainLine Management is our general partner and is wholly owned by BGH GP.
Services Company and Buckeye are considered related parties with respect to us. As discussed
in Note 1, our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Services Company
and Buckeye on a consolidated basis, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
We incurred a senior administrative charge for certain management services performed by
affiliates of Buckeye GP of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The senior
administrative charge was waived indefinitely on April 1, 2009 as these affiliates are currently
not providing services to us that were contemplated as being covered by the senior administrative
charge. As a result, there were no related charges recorded in the last nine months of 2009 or
during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
16. CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
We generally make quarterly cash distributions to unitholders of substantially all of our
available cash, generally defined in our partnership agreement as consolidated cash receipts less
consolidated cash expenditures and such retentions for working capital, anticipated cash
expenditures and contingencies as our general partner deems
24
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
appropriate. Cash distributions totaled $11.6 million and $9.3 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
On May 7, 2010, we announced a quarterly distribution of $0.43 per Common Unit that will be
paid on May 28, 2010, to unitholders of record on May 17, 2010. Total cash distributed to
unitholders on May 28, 2010 will total approximately $12.2 million.
17. EARNINGS PER PARTNERSHIP UNIT
Basic and diluted earnings per partnership unit is calculated by dividing net income, after
deducting the amount allocated to Buckeye, by the weighted-average number of partnership units
outstanding during the period.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of Common Units used in
the basic and diluted earnings per unit calculations for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding |
|
|
27,774 |
|
|
|
27,770 |
|
Weighted average management units outstanding |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units for basic |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units used for basic calculation |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
28,300 |
|
Dilutive effect of additional management units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units for diluted |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We operate and report in five business segments: Pipeline Operations; Terminalling & Storage;
Natural Gas Storage; Energy Services; and Development & Logistics.
Each segment uses the same accounting policies as those used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements. All inter-segment revenues, operating income and assets have
been eliminated. All periods are presented on a consistent basis. All of our operations and
assets are conducted and located in the United States.
25
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial information about each segment is presented below for the periods or at the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
96,537 |
|
|
$ |
99,195 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
42,371 |
|
|
|
30,643 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
25,406 |
|
|
|
15,077 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
568,202 |
|
|
|
268,480 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
7,515 |
|
|
|
9,125 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(5,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
731,174 |
|
|
$ |
416,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
45,365 |
|
|
$ |
44,448 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
23,125 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
(3,397 |
) |
|
|
6,215 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
69,491 |
|
|
$ |
68,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
8,953 |
|
|
$ |
8,839 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14,528 |
|
|
$ |
13,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital additions: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
5,641 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital additions |
|
$ |
9,608 |
|
|
$ |
19,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount includes ($1.4) million and ($1.5) million of non-cash changes in accruals for
capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
26
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations (1) |
|
$ |
1,592,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,916 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
532,971 |
|
|
|
532,971 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
573,261 |
|
|
|
573,261 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
482,025 |
|
|
|
482,025 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
74,476 |
|
|
|
74,476 |
|
Consolidating level |
|
|
99,430 |
|
|
|
230,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,355,079 |
|
|
$ |
3,486,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
198,632 |
|
|
$ |
198,632 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
49,618 |
|
|
|
49,618 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
169,560 |
|
|
|
169,560 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
432,124 |
|
|
$ |
432,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All equity investments are included in the assets of the Pipeline Operations segment. |
19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flows and non-cash transactions were as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest) |
|
$ |
32,351 |
|
|
$ |
25,866 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in capital expenditures in accounts payable |
|
$ |
(1,355 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,522 |
) |
27
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report. The following
information and such unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should also be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with our
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on
our beliefs, as well as assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. When
used in this document, words such as proposed, anticipate, project, potential, could,
should, continue, estimate, expect, may, believe, will, plan, seek, outlook and
similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that such expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot give any assurances that
such expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions as described in more detail in Item 1A Risk Factors included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. If one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may
vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected. You should not put undue
reliance on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly
Report speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by federal and state securities laws,
we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as
a result of new information, future events or any other reason.
Overview of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
A summary of the significant accounting policies we have adopted and followed in the
preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements is included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain of these accounting policies require the
use of estimates. As more fully described therein, the following estimates, in our opinion, are
subjective in nature, require the exercise of judgment and involve complex analysis: depreciation
methods, estimated useful lives and disposals of property, plant and equipment; reserves for
environmental matters; fair value of derivatives; measuring the fair value of goodwill; and
measuring recoverability of long-lived assets and equity method investments. These estimates are
based on our knowledge and understanding of current conditions and actions we may take in the
future. Changes in these estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the
occurrence of future events. Subsequent changes in these estimates may have a significant impact
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Overview of BGH
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware master limited partnership (MLP), the
common units (Common Units) of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the
ticker symbol BGH. We own 100% of Buckeye GP LLC (Buckeye GP), which is the general partner of
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (Buckeye). Buckeye is also a publicly traded Delaware MLP which was
organized in 1986, and its limited partner units (LP Units) are separately traded on the NYSE
under the ticker symbol BPL. Approximately 62% of our outstanding equity, which includes Common
Units and management units (Management Units) are owned by BGH GP Holdings, LLC (BGH GP) and
approximately 38% by the public. BGH GP is owned by affiliates of ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC
(ArcLight), Kelso & Company (Kelso), and certain investment funds along with certain members of
senior management of Buckeye GP. MainLine Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(MainLine Management), is our general partner and is wholly owned by BGH GP. Unless the context
requires otherwise, references to we, us, our, or BGH are intended to mean the business and
operations of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. on a consolidated basis, including those of Buckeye.
References to Buckeye mean Buckeye Partners, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
28
Our only cash-generating assets are our partnership interests in Buckeye, comprised primarily
of the following:
|
|
|
the incentive distribution rights in Buckeye; |
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the general partner interests in certain of Buckeyes
operating subsidiaries (representing an approximate 1% interest in each of such
operating subsidiaries); |
|
|
|
|
the general partner interests in Buckeye (representing 243,914 general partner units
(the GP Units), or an approximate 0.5% interest in Buckeye); and |
|
|
|
|
80,000 of Buckeyes LP Units. |
The incentive distribution rights noted above entitle us to receive amounts equal to specified
percentages of the incremental amount of cash distributed by Buckeye to the holders of LP Units
when target distribution levels for each quarter are exceeded. The 2,573,146 LP Units originally
issued to the Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP) are
excluded for the purpose of calculating incentive distributions. The target distribution levels
begin at $0.325 and increase in steps to the highest target distribution level of $0.525 per
eligible LP Unit. When Buckeye makes quarterly distributions above this level, the incentive
distributions include an amount equal to 45% of the incremental cash distributed to each eligible
unitholder for the quarter, or approximately 29.5% of total incremental cash distributed by Buckeye
above $0.525 per LP Unit.
Our earnings and cash flows are, therefore, directly dependent upon the ability of Buckeye and
its operating subsidiaries to make cash distributions to its unitholders. The actual amount of
cash that Buckeye will have available for distribution will depend primarily on its ability to
generate earnings and cash flows beyond its working capital requirements.
The following table summarizes the cash we received for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 as a result of our partnership interests in Buckeye (in thousands, except unit amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Incentive payments from Buckeye |
|
$ |
12,314 |
|
|
$ |
10,505 |
|
Distributions from the indirect 1% ownership in
certain of Buckeyes operating subsidiaries |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Distributions from the ownership of 243,914 of
Buckeyes GP Units |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Distributions from the ownership of 80,000 of
Buckeyes LP Units |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received |
|
$ |
13,021 |
|
|
$ |
11,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of Buckeye Partners, L.P.
Buckeyes primary business strategies are to generate stable cash flows, increase pipeline and
terminal throughput and pursue strategic cash-flow accretive acquisitions that complement its
existing asset base, improve operating efficiencies and allow increased cash distributions to its
unitholders.
We, through Buckeye, operate and report in five business segments: Pipeline Operations;
Terminalling & Storage; Natural Gas Storage; Energy Services; and Development & Logistics.
Buckeyes principal line of business is the transportation, terminalling, storage and marketing of
refined petroleum products in the United States for
major integrated oil companies, large refined petroleum product marketing companies and major end
users of refined petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities it owns and operates.
Buckeye owns a major natural gas storage facility in northern California. In addition, Buckeye
operates and maintains approximately 2,400 miles of other pipelines under agreements with major oil
and gas, petrochemical and chemical companies, and performs certain engineering and construction
management services for third parties.
29
Recent Developments
Sale of Buckeye NGL Pipeline
Effective January 1, 2010, we sold our ownership interest in an approximately 350-mile natural
gas liquids pipeline (the Buckeye NGL Pipeline) that runs from Wattenberg, Colorado to Bushton,
Kansas for $22.0 million. The assets had been classified as Assets held for sale in our
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 with a carrying amount equal to the proceeds
received.
Results of Operations
The results of operations discussed below principally reflect the activities of Buckeye.
Since our condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated results of Buckeye,
our condensed consolidated financial statements are substantially similar to Buckeyes except as
noted below:
|
|
|
Interest of noncontrolling partners in Buckeye Our condensed consolidated balance
sheets include a noncontrolling interests capital account that reflects the proportion of
Buckeye owned by its partners other than us. Similarly, the ownership interests in Buckeye
held by its partners other than us are reflected in our condensed consolidated statements
of operations as income attributable to noncontrolling interests. These noncontrolling
interest accounts are not reflected in Buckeyes condensed consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
Our capital structure In addition to incorporating the assets and liabilities of
Buckeye, our condensed consolidated balance sheets include our own indebtedness and related
debt placement costs, and the partners capital on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets represent our partners capital as opposed to the capital reflected in Buckeyes
condensed consolidated balance sheets, which reflects the ownership interest of all its
partners, including its owners other than us or Services Company. Consequently, our
condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect additional interest expense,
interest income and debt amortization expense that is not reflected in Buckeyes condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Inclusion of Services Company The financial statements of Services Company, which
employs the employees who manage and operate our assets, are consolidated into our
financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Buckeye do not
include the financial statements of Services Company. |
|
|
|
|
Our general and administrative expenses We incur general and administrative expenses
that are independent from Buckeyes operations and are not reflected in Buckeyes condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions Intercompany obligations and payments among
Buckeye and its consolidated subsidiaries, us and Services Company are reflected in
Buckeyes condensed consolidated financial statements but are eliminated in our condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
30
Segment Results
A summary of financial information by business segment follows for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
96,537 |
|
|
$ |
99,195 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
42,371 |
|
|
|
30,643 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
25,406 |
|
|
|
15,077 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
568,202 |
|
|
|
268,480 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
7,515 |
|
|
|
9,125 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(5,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
731,174 |
|
|
$ |
416,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
51,172 |
|
|
$ |
54,747 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
19,246 |
|
|
|
19,986 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
21,955 |
|
|
|
8,913 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
571,599 |
|
|
|
262,265 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
(8,857 |
) |
|
|
(5,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
661,683 |
|
|
$ |
347,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
8,953 |
|
|
$ |
8,839 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14,528 |
|
|
$ |
13,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline Operations |
|
$ |
45,365 |
|
|
$ |
44,448 |
|
Terminalling & Storage |
|
|
23,125 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
Natural Gas Storage |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
Energy Services |
|
|
(3,397 |
) |
|
|
6,215 |
|
Development & Logistics |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
69,491 |
|
|
$ |
68,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes depreciation and amortization. |
31
Costs and expenses attributable to Buckeye, Services Company and us were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Attributable to Buckeye |
|
$ |
660,154 |
|
|
$ |
346,737 |
|
Elimination of Buckeye deferred charge |
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
Net effect of ESOP charges |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Attributable to BGH |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
661,683 |
|
|
$ |
347,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to us were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Payroll and payroll benefits |
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Other |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,828 |
|
|
$ |
2,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and benefits costs include salaries and benefits for the four highest paid executives
performing services on behalf of Buckeye, as well as allocations of the cost of Buckeye personnel
performing administrative services directly for BGH.
The following table presents product volumes transported in the Pipeline Operations segment
and average daily throughput for the Terminalling & Storage segment in barrels per day and total
volumes sold in gallons for the Energy Services segment for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Pipeline Operations: (average barrels per day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline |
|
|
608,900 |
|
|
|
632,400 |
|
Jet fuel |
|
|
322,300 |
|
|
|
333,300 |
|
Diesel fuel |
|
|
227,500 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
Heating oil |
|
|
113,900 |
|
|
|
131,100 |
|
LPGs |
|
|
20,500 |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
NGLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,300 |
|
Other products |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pipeline Operations |
|
|
1,293,900 |
|
|
|
1,367,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling & Storage: (average barrels per day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products throughput (1) |
|
|
556,300 |
|
|
|
480,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services: (in thousands of gallons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales volumes |
|
|
266,900 |
|
|
|
205,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reported quantities exclude transfer volumes, which are non-revenue generating
transfers among our various terminals. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
previously reported 521.0 thousand, which included transfer volumes. |
32
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Consolidated
Consolidated income attributable to our unitholders was $11.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to $10.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
increase in income attributable to our unitholders was due to increases in Buckeyes quarterly
distribution. As mentioned above, the incentive distribution rights entitle us to receive amounts
equal to specified percentages of the incremental amount of cash distributed by Buckeye to the
holders of Buckeyes LP Units when target distribution levels for a quarter are exceeded. As a
result, increases in Buckeyes distributions causes increases in income attributable to our
unitholders. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Buckeye paid a $0.9375 per LP Unit
distribution as compared to a $0.8875 per LP Unit distribution in the three months ended March 31,
2009, which resulted in an increase of $1.8 million in incentive distributions in the 2010 period
as compared to the corresponding period in 2009.
Revenue was $731.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which is an increase of
$314.3 million, or 75.4%, from the three months ended March 31, 2009. This overall increase was
caused primarily by an increase of $299.7 million in revenues from the Energy Services segment, an
increase of $11.8 million in revenues from the Terminalling & Storage segment and an increase of
$10.3 million in revenues from the Natural Gas Storage segment. The increase in revenues in the
Energy Services segment resulted from an overall increase in refined petroleum product prices and
volumes of product sold in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in
2009. The increase in revenues in the Terminalling & Storage segment resulted primarily from
increased fees, storage and rental revenue, including $1.7 million in storage fees from previously
underutilized tankage identified in connection with our best-practice
initiatives, increased revenue from terminals acquired in November
2009 (see Note 2 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and
favorable settlement experience. The increase in revenues from the Natural Gas Storage segment
resulted from increased activity from the commencement of operations of the Kirby Hills Phase II
expansion project in June 2009. These increases in revenue were partially offset by a decrease of
$2.7 million in revenues from the Pipeline Operations segment and a decrease of $1.6 million in
revenue from the Development & Logistics segment. Revenue decreased in the Pipeline Operations
segment primarily due to lower transportation volumes and lower miscellaneous revenues, partially
offset by increased tariffs, favorable settlement experience and increased revenues from the
pipeline assets acquired in November 2009. Revenue decreased in the Development & Logistics segment primarily due to
decreased construction activities.
Total costs and expenses were $661.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which
is an increase of $313.9 million, or 90.2%, from the corresponding period in 2009. Total costs and
expenses reflect an increase in refined petroleum product prices, which, coupled with an increase
in volume sold, resulted in a $309.9 million increase in the Energy Services segments cost of
product sales in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. Total costs and expenses also
reflect an increase of $13.2 million in the Natural Gas Storage segments costs and expenses
resulting from higher costs associated with hub services transactions caused by general market
conditions. Total costs and expenses also include an increase of $1.1 million in depreciation and
amortization and an increase of $1.2 million in non-cash unit-based compensation expense. These
increases in total costs and expenses were largely offset by decreases of $3.5 million, $1.1
million and $0.8 million in the costs and expenses of the Pipeline Operations segment, the
Development & Logistics segment and the Terminalling & Storage segment, respectively. The decrease
in the costs and expenses of the Pipeline Operations segment was driven by lower payroll and
benefits costs, which was primarily attributable to the organizational restructuring that occurred
in 2009, which resulted in reduced headcount, as well as from lower contract service activities and
lower environmental remediation expenses. The decrease in the costs and expenses of the
Development & Logistics segment was primarily due to reduced construction contract activity and
reduced operating services activities. The decrease in the costs and expenses of the Terminalling
& Storage segment primarily resulted from lower environmental remediation expenses. Total costs
and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 reflect the effectiveness of cost management
efforts we implemented in 2009. Largely as a result of these efforts, costs decreased by
approximately $4.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2009.
Operating income was $69.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to
operating income of $68.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Interest and debt
expense increased by $4.3 million in
33
the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009, which was largely attributable to the issuance in August 2009 of
$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.500% Notes due 2019. In addition, depreciation and
amortization increased by $1.1 million, primarily due to the assets utilized with respect to the
Kirby Hills Phase II expansion project, which were placed in service in the second half of 2009,
and certain internal-use software, which was placed in service in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Income from equity investments increased by $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010
as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. Other revenue and expense items impacting
operating income are discussed above.
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests, which represents the allocation of Buckeyes
income to its limited partner interests not owned by us or Services Company, was $39.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $43.5 million in the corresponding period in
2009.
For a more detailed discussion of the above factors affecting our results, see the following
discussion by segment.
Pipeline Operations
Revenue from the Pipeline Operations segment was $96.5 million in the three months ended March
31, 2010, which is a decrease of $2.7 million, or 2.7%, from the corresponding period in 2009.
Revenues decreased primarily due to a $4.8 million decrease related to a 5.4% decrease in
transportation volumes due in part to the sale of Buckeye NGL Pipeline on January 1, 2010 (see Note
2 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements) and a $3.1 million
decrease in miscellaneous other revenue, including revenues from a product supply arrangement with
a wholesale distributor and contract service activities at customer facilities connected to our
refined petroleum products pipelines. These decreases were partially offset by higher tariffs of
$2.5 million, favorable settlement experience of $2.0 million and increased revenues of $0.6
million from the pipeline assets acquired in November 2009. An overall average tariff increase of
approximately 3.8% was implemented on July 1, 2009.
Total costs and expenses from the Pipeline Operations segment were $51.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, which is a decrease of $3.5 million, or 6.5%, from the corresponding
period in 2009. Total costs and expenses include decreases in (i) payroll and benefits costs of $2.2 million, pursuant to
our best-practice initiative in 2009; (ii) contract service activities of $1.1 million at customer
facilities connected to our refined petroleum products pipelines; (iii) environmental remediation
expenses of $1.5 million and (iv) product costs of $0.4 million as a result of reduced volumes of
product sold to a wholesale distributor. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of
$0.4 million in professional fees, as well as increases in other expenses, primarily consisting of
an increase of $0.6 million in bad debt expense. Total costs and expenses also include an increase
of $0.7 million in non-cash unit-based compensation expense.
Operating income from the Pipeline Operations segment was $45.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to operating income of $44.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009. Depreciation and amortization of $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010
was relatively consistent with the corresponding period in 2009. Other revenue and expense items
impacting operating income are discussed above.
Terminalling & Storage
Revenue
from the Terminalling & Storage segment was $42.4 million
in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which is an increase
of $11.8 million, or 38.3%, from the corresponding period in
2009. The majority of the increase resulted from an increase of
$10.9 million, primarily from (i) terminals acquired in November
2009, (ii) internal growth projects, (iii) higher fees, as well as
higher storage and rental revenue of $3.5 million, including
$1.7 million in storage fees from previously underutilized
tankage identified in connection with our best-practice initiatives
and (iv) increased butane-blending revenue. Also contributing to the
improved revenue was an increase of $0.9 million in settlement
experience reflecting the favorable impact of higher refined
petroleum product prices during the three months ended March 31,
2010 as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. In addition to
the 10.5% increase in volumes resulting from the acquisition of
terminals in November 2009, terminalling volumes increased 5.2% in
the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2009 largely due to increased ethanol
throughput volumes.
34
Total costs and expenses from the Terminalling & Storage segment were $19.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, which is a decrease of $0.8 million, or 3.7%, from the corresponding period in 2009. Total
costs and expenses reflect a $2.4 million decrease in environmental remediation expenses
and a decrease in payroll and benefits
costs of approximately $0.6 million, partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in operating expenses for terminals
acquired in November 2009 and a $0.6 million increase in bad debt expense. Total costs and expenses also include an increase
of $0.6 million in depreciation and amortization and an increase of $0.2 million in non-cash unit-based compensation expense.
Operating income from the Terminalling & Storage segment was $23.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to operating income of $10.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. Depreciation and amortization increased by $0.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 as a result of the terminals acquired in November 2009. Other revenue and
expense items impacting operating income are discussed above.
Natural Gas Storage
Revenue from the Natural Gas Storage segment was $25.4 million in the three months ended March
31, 2010, which is an increase of $10.3 million, or 68.5%, from the corresponding period in 2009.
This overall increase is attributable to greater underlying volume for hub services provided during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. In addition, this
increase is due to higher fees recognized as revenue for hub services provided during the three
months ended March 31, 2010. The fees for hub services agreements are based on the relative market
prices of natural gas over different delivery periods. When that market price spread is positive,
a fee is received from the customer and reflected as transportation and other services revenue.
When that market price spread is negative, a fee is paid to the customer and reflected as cost of
natural gas storage services. These fees are recognized as revenue or cost of natural gas storage services ratably
as the underlying services are provided or utilized. Such agreements are entered into in order to
maximize the daily utilization of the natural gas storage facility and to attempt to capture value
from seasonal price differences in the natural gas markets. During each respective period, there
were 155 outstanding hub service contracts for which revenue was being recognized ratably. Market
conditions contributed to higher fees for hub service agreements recognized as revenue during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. In addition, lease revenue
increased $1.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as storage capacity increased
from the commissioning of the Kirby Hills Phase
II expansion project, which was placed in service in June 2009, partially offset by a decrease
in the fee charged for each volumetric unit of storage capacity leased.
Total costs and expenses from the Natural Gas Storage segment were $22.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, which is an increase of $13.2 million, or 146.3%, from the
corresponding period in 2009. The primary driver of the increase in expenses is an increase in hub
services fees paid to customers for hub service activities. As stated above, hub service fees are
based on the relative market prices of natural gas over different delivery periods; when that
market price spread is negative, a fee is paid to the customer, which is reflected as cost of
natural gas storage services ratably as those services are provided. Total costs and expenses also include
an increase of $0.1 million in depreciation and amortization and an increase of $0.1 million in
non-cash unit-based compensation expense.
Operating income from the Natural Gas Storage segment was $3.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to operating income of $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
decrease in operating income was primarily the result of a $3.9 million decrease in the net contribution from
hub service activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010, partially offset by increased lease
revenues of $1.5 million. The increase in lease revenues was the result of increased storage capacity from the
commissioning of the Kirby Hills Phase II expansion project, which was placed in service in June 2009,
partially offset by a decrease in the fee charged for each volumetric unit of storage capacity leased.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $0.1 million in the 2010 period from the corresponding period in
2009 due to depreciation expense on the assets utilized with respect to the Kirby Hills Phase II expansion
project, which were placed in service in the second half of 2009. Other revenue and expense items impacting
operating income are discussed above.
Energy Services
Revenue from the Energy Services segment was $568.2 million in the three months ended March
31, 2010, which is an increase of $299.7 million, or 111.6%, from the corresponding period in 2009.
This increase was primarily due to an increase in refined petroleum product prices, which
correspondingly increases the cost of products sales, as discussed below, and an increase of 30.1%
in sales volumes.
35
Total costs and expenses from the Energy Services segment were $571.6 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, which is an increase of $309.3 million, or 117.9%, from the
corresponding period in 2009. The increase in total costs and expenses was primarily due to an
increase of $309.9 million in cost of product sales as a result of increased volumes and an
increase in refined petroleum product prices. The increase in expenses was a result of the
withdrawal of product from inventory as the market conditions changed and commodity prices were no longer in contango. The increase in product supply from inventory liquidation, coupled with lower
overall product demand, created additional pressure on margins, partially offset by the increase in
sales volumes discussed above. Total costs and expenses also include an increase of $0.5 million in bad debt expense, an increase of $0.2 million
in depreciation and amortization and an increase of $0.2 million in non-cash unit-based
compensation expense.
Operating loss from the Energy Services segment was $3.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to operating income of $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Depreciation and amortization increased by $0.2 million for the 2010 period from the
corresponding period in 2009 due to amortization of certain internal-use software that was placed
in service in the fourth quarter of 2009. Other revenue and expense items impacting operating
income (loss) are discussed above.
Development & Logistics
Revenue from the Development & Logistics segment, which consists principally of our contract
operations and engineering services for third-party pipelines, was $7.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2010, which is a decrease of $1.6 million, or 17.6%, from the corresponding period
in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the completion and non-replacement of construction
projects in 2009, resulting in a $1.5 million reduction in certain construction contract revenues.
The decrease was also partially the result of a $0.2 million reduction in operating services
primarily related to the non-renewal of an operating lease contract that expired in 2009.
Total costs and expenses from the Development & Logistics segment were $6.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, which is a decrease of $1.1 million, or 15.2%, from the
corresponding period in 2009. The decrease was the result of the reduced construction contract
activity and reduced operating services activities discussed above.
Operating income from the Development & Logistics segment was $0.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to operating income of $1.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Depreciation and amortization of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was consistent with the corresponding period in 2009, and income taxes decreased by $0.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due to lower earnings. Other revenue and expense
items impacting operating income are discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BGH
We currently have no capital requirements apart from Buckeyes capital requirements.
Buckeyes capital requirements consist of maintenance and capital expenditures, expenditures for
acquisitions and debt service requirements.
Our only cash-generating asset is our ownership interest in Buckeye GP. Our cash flow is,
therefore, directly dependent upon the ability of Buckeye and its operating subsidiaries to make
cash distributions to Buckeyes partners. The actual amount of cash that Buckeye will have
available for distribution depends primarily on Buckeyes ability to generate cash beyond its
working capital requirements.
Our principal uses of cash are the payment of our operating expenses and distributions to our
unitholders. We generally make quarterly cash distributions of substantially all of our available
cash, generally defined as consolidated cash receipts less consolidated cash expenditures and such
retentions for working capital, anticipated cash expenditures and contingencies as MainLine
Management deems appropriate. In the first quarter of 2010, we paid cash distributions of $0.41 per Common Unit on February 26, 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, we paid cash
36
distributions of
$0.33 per Common Unit on February 28, 2009. Total cash distributed to our unitholders for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $11.6 million and $9.3 million,
respectively.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no amounts outstanding under our unsecured
revolving credit facility (the BGH Credit Agreement). See Note 10 in the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the terms of the BGH Credit
Agreement.
Services Company
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Services Company had total debt outstanding of $6.1
million and $7.7 million, respectively, consisting of 3.60% Senior Secured Notes (the 3.60% ESOP
Notes) due March 28, 2011 payable by the ESOP to a third-party lender. The 3.60% ESOP Notes were
issued on May 4, 2004. The 3.60% ESOP Notes are collateralized by Services Companys common stock
and are guaranteed by Services Company. In addition, Buckeye has committed that, in the event that
the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company falls below 125% of the balance payable
under the 3.60% ESOP Notes, Buckeye will fund an escrow account with sufficient assets to bring the
value of the total collateral (the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company and the
escrow account) up to the 125% minimum. Amounts deposited in the escrow account are returned to
Buckeye when the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services Company returns to an amount that
exceeds the 125% minimum. At March 31, 2010, the value of Buckeyes LP Units owned by Services
Company exceeded the 125% requirement.
Buckeye
Buckeyes primary cash requirements, in addition to normal operating expenses and debt
service, are for working capital, capital expenditures, business acquisitions and distributions to
its partners. Buckeyes principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, borrowings under
its unsecured revolving credit agreement (the Credit Facility) and proceeds from the issuance of
its LP Units. Buckeye will, from time to time, issue debt securities to permanently finance
amounts borrowed under its Credit Facility. Buckeye Energy Services LLC (BES) funds its working
capital needs principally from its operations and a secured credit facility (the BES Credit
Agreement). Buckeyes financial policy has been to fund sustaining capital expenditures with cash
from operations. Expansion and cost improvement capital expenditures, along with acquisitions,
have typically been funded from external sources including Buckeyes Credit Facility as well as debt and equity offerings.
Buckeyes goal has been to fund at least half of these expenditures with proceeds from equity
offerings in order to maintain its investment-grade credit rating.
As a result of Buckeyes actions to minimize external financing requirements and the fact that
no debt facilities mature prior to 2011, Buckeye believes that availabilities under its credit
facilities, coupled with ongoing cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to fund its
operations for the remainder of 2010. Buckeye will continue to evaluate a variety of financing
sources, including the debt and equity markets described above, throughout 2010. However,
continuing volatility in the debt and equity markets will make the timing and cost of any such
potential financing uncertain.
At March 31, 2010, Buckeye had $16.5 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and
approximately $413.0 million of available credit under its Credit Facility, after application of
the facilitys funded debt ratio covenant. In addition, at March 31, 2010, BES had $40.5 million
of available credit under the BES Credit Agreement, pursuant to certain borrowing base calculations
under that agreement.
At March 31, 2010, Buckeye had an aggregate face amount of $1,628.5 million of debt, which
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
$300.0 million of 4.625% Notes due 2013 (the 4.625% Notes); |
|
|
|
|
$275.0 million of 5.300% Notes due 2014 (the 5.300% Notes); |
|
|
|
|
$125.0 million of 5.125% Notes due 2017 (the 5.125% Notes); |
|
|
|
|
$300.0 million of 6.050% Notes due 2018 (the 6.050% Notes); |
|
|
|
|
$275.0 million of 5.500% Notes due 2019 (the 5.500% Notes); |
37
|
|
|
$150.0 million of 6.750% Notes due 2033 (the 6.750% Notes); |
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million outstanding under its Credit Facility; and |
|
|
|
|
$183.5 million outstanding under the BES Credit Agreement. |
See Note 10 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information about the terms of the debt discussed above.
The fair values of Buckeyes aggregate debt and credit facilities were estimated to be
$1,677.4 million and $1,762.1 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The
fair values of the fixed-rate debt were estimated by observing market trading prices and by
comparing the historic market prices of its publicly-issued debt with the market prices of other
MLPs publicly-issued debt with similar credit ratings and terms. The fair values of Buckeyes
variable-rate debt are their carrying amounts, as the carrying amount reasonably approximates fair
value due to the variability of the interest rates.
Registration Statement
Buckeye may issue equity or debt securities to assist it in meeting its liquidity and capital
spending requirements. Buckeye has a universal shelf registration statement on file with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that would allow it to issue an unlimited amount of debt
and equity securities for general partnership purposes.
Credit Ratings
Buckeyes debt securities are rated BBB by Standard & Poors Ratings Services and Baa2 by
Moodys Investors Service, both with stable outlooks. Such ratings reflect only the view of the
rating agency and should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold its or our
securities. These ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the agencies at their
discretion and should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing
activities for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
144,048 |
|
|
$ |
78,773 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
11,211 |
|
|
|
(21,018 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(172,679 |
) |
|
|
(98,089 |
) |
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $144.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to $78.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The following
were the principal factors resulting in the $65.2 million increase in net cash flows provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
The net change in fair values of derivatives was a decrease of $19.2 million to cash
flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010, resulting
from the increase in value related to fixed-price sales contracts compared to a lower
level of opposite fluctuations in futures contracts purchased to hedge such
fluctuations. |
|
|
|
|
The net impact of working capital changes was an increase of $90.4 million to cash
flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
principal factors affecting the working capital changes were: |
38
|
|
|
Inventories decreased by $73.7 million due to a decrease in
volume of hedged inventory stored by the Energy Services segment. From time to
time, the Energy Services segment stores hedged inventory to attempt to capture
value when market conditions are economically favorable. |
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables increased by $10.4 million primarily due to
increased activity from our Energy Services segment due to higher volumes and
higher commodity prices in the 2010 period. |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets decreased by $26.2 million
primarily due to a decrease in margin deposits on futures contracts in our
Energy Services segment as a result of increased commodity prices during the
first quarter of 2010 (increased commodity prices result in an increase in our
broker equity account and therefore less margin deposit is required), a
decrease in unbilled revenue within our Natural Gas Storage segment reflecting
billings to counterparties in accordance with terms of their storage agreements
and a decrease in prepaid insurance due to continued amortization of the
balance over the policy period. |
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities increased by $1.3 million
primarily due to increases in unearned revenue primarily in the Natural Gas
Storage segment as a result of increased hub services contracts during the
first quarter of 2010 for which the customer is billed up front for services
provided over the entire term of the contract, an increase in accrued property
taxes for the Natural Gas Storage segment as a result of the Kirby Hills II
expansion project and an increase in accrued excise taxes for the Energy
Services segment due to higher revenues, largely offset by a reduction in
accrued interest resulting from interest payments made during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and a reduction in the reorganization accrual. |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased by $3.1 million primarily due to
lower payable balances at March 31, 2010 as a result of lower outside services
and project work performed in the first quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Construction and pipeline relocation receivables decreased by
$2.7 million primarily due to a decrease in construction activity in the 2010
period. |
Investing Activities
Net cash flow provided by investing activities was $11.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to net cash flow used in investing activities of $21.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The following were the principal factors resulting in the $32.2
million increase in net cash flows provided by investing activities:
|
|
|
Capital expenditures decreased by $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009. See below for a discussion
of capital spending. |
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds from the sale of the Buckeye NGL Pipeline were $22.0 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
Capital expenditures are summarized below (net of non-cash changes in accruals for capital
expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009) for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
$ |
4,883 |
|
Expansion and cost reduction |
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
16,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
10,963 |
|
|
$ |
20,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion and cost reduction projects in the first quarter of 2010 included terminal ethanol
and butane blending, new pipeline connections, natural gas well recompletions, continued progress
on a new pipeline and terminal billing system as well as various other operating infrastructure
projects. In the first quarter of 2009,
39
expansion and cost reduction projects included the Kirby Hills Phase II expansion project, terminal ethanol and butane blending, the construction of three
additional tanks with capacity of 0.4 million barrels in Linden, New Jersey and various other
pipeline and terminal operating infrastructure projects.
We expect to spend approximately $90.0 million to $110.0 million for capital expenditures in
2010, of which approximately $25.0 million to $35.0 million is expected to relate to sustaining
capital expenditures and $65.0 million to $75.0 million is expected to relate to expansion and cost
reduction projects. Sustaining capital expenditures include renewals and replacement of pipeline
sections, tank floors and tank roofs and upgrades to station and terminalling equipment, field
instrumentation and cathodic protection systems. Major expansion and cost reduction expenditures
in 2010 will include the completion of additional product storage tanks in the Midwest, the
construction of a 4.4 mile pipeline in central Connecticut to connect our pipeline in Connecticut
to a third-party electric generation plant currently under construction, various terminal
expansions and upgrades and pipeline and terminal automation projects.
Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in financing activities was $172.7 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 compared to $98.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The following were
the principal factors resulting in the $74.6 million increase in net cash flows used in financing
activities:
|
|
|
Buckeye borrowed $59.5 million and $30.0 million and repaid $117.5 million and
$120.3 million under its Credit Facility during the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Net repayments under the BES Credit Agreement were $56.3 million and $46.0 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
We received $2.4 million in net proceeds from the exercise of Buckeyes LP Unit
options during the first quarter of 2010. We received $91.0 million in net proceeds
from an underwritten equity offering in March 2009 for Buckeyes public issuance of 2.6
million LP Units. |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions paid to our partners increased by $2.3 million period-to-period
due to an increase in the number of Common Units outstanding and an increase in our
quarterly cash distribution rate per Common Unit. We paid cash distributions of $11.6
million ($0.41 per Common Unit) and $9.3 million ($0.33 per Common Unit) during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
Derivatives
See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Market Risk Non
Trading Instruments for a discussion of commodity derivatives used by our Energy Services segment.
Other Considerations
Contractual Obligations
With the exception of routine fluctuations in the balance of Buckeyes Credit Facility and the
BES Credit Agreement, there have been no material changes in our scheduled maturities of or debt
obligations since those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Total rental expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $5.0 million and
$5.3 million, respectively. There have been no material changes in our operating lease commitments
since December 31, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no material changes with regard to our off-balance sheet arrangements since
those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
40
Related Party Transactions
With respect to related party transactions, see Note 15 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a
description of certain new accounting pronouncements that will or may affect our consolidated
financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk Trading Instruments
We have no trading derivative instruments and do not engage in hedging activity with respect
to trading instruments.
Market Risk Non-Trading Instruments
We are exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in commodity prices and
interest rates. We do not currently have foreign exchange risk.
Commodity Risk
Natural Gas Storage
The Natural Gas Storage segment enters into interruptible natural gas storage hub service
agreements in order to maximize the daily utilization of the natural gas storage facility, while
also attempting to capture value from seasonal price differences in the natural gas markets.
Although the Natural Gas Storage segment does not purchase or sell natural gas, the Natural Gas Storage
segment is subject to commodity risk because the value of natural gas storage hub services
generally fluctuates based on changes in the relative market prices of natural gas over different
delivery periods.
As of March 31, 2010, the Natural Gas Storage segment has recorded the following assets and
liabilities related to its hub services agreements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Hub service agreements |
|
$ |
32,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Hub service agreements |
|
|
(24,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services
Our Energy Services segment primarily uses exchange-traded refined petroleum product futures
contracts to manage the risk of market price volatility on its refined petroleum product
inventories and its fixed-price sales contracts. The derivative contracts used to hedge refined petroleum product inventories are
classified as fair value hedges. Accordingly, our method of measuring ineffectiveness compares the
changes in the fair value of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) futures contracts to the
change in fair value of our hedged fuel inventory.
41
The Energy Services segment has not used hedge accounting with respect to its fixed-price
sales contracts. Therefore, its fixed-price sales contracts and the related futures contracts used
to offset those fixed-price sales contracts are all marked-to-market on the balance sheet with
gains and losses being recognized in earnings during each reporting period.
As of March 31, 2010, the Energy Services segment had derivative assets and liabilities as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price sales contracts |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
Futures contracts for inventory and fixed-price sales
contracts |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the unrealized loss at March 31, 2010 for inventory hedges represented by
futures contracts will be realized by the second quarter of 2010 as the related inventory is sold.
Gains recorded on inventory hedges that were ineffective were approximately $4.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010. At March 31, 2010, open refined petroleum product derivative
contracts (represented by the fixed-price sales contracts and futures contracts for fixed-price
sales contracts and inventory noted above) varied in duration, but did not extend beyond May 2011.
In addition, at March 31, 2010, we had refined petroleum product inventories which we intend to use
to satisfy a portion of the fixed-price sales contracts.
Based on a hypothetical 10% movement in the underlying quoted market prices of the commodity
financial instruments outstanding at March 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of the portfolio of
commodity financial instruments would be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
|
|
Resulting |
|
Portfolio |
|
Scenario |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair value assuming
no change in underlying
commodity prices (as is) |
|
Liability |
|
$ |
(867 |
) |
Fair value assuming 10%
increase in underlying
commodity prices |
|
Liability |
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
Fair value assuming 10%
decrease in underlying
commodity prices |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
20,986 |
|
The value of the open futures contract positions noted above were based upon quoted market
prices obtained from NYMEX. The value of the fixed-price sales contracts was based on observable
market data related to the obligation to provide refined petroleum products to customers.
Interest Rate Risk
Buckeye utilizes forward-starting interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk related to
forecasted interest payments on anticipated debt issuances. This strategy is a component in
controlling its cost of capital associated with such borrowings. When entering into interest rate
swap transactions, Buckeye becomes exposed to both credit risk and market risk. Buckeye is subject
to credit risk when the value of the swap transaction is positive and the risk
42
exists that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the contract. Buckeye is subject to market
risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impact the fair value
of the swaps. Buckeye manages its credit risk by only entering into swap transactions with major
financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings. Buckeye manages its market risk by
associating each swap transaction with an existing debt obligation or a specified expected debt
issuance generally associated with the maturity of an existing debt obligation.
Buckeyes practice with respect to derivative transactions related to interest rate risk has
been to have each transaction in connection with non-routine borrowings authorized by the Board of
Directors of Buckeye GP. In January 2009, Buckeye GPs Board of Directors adopted an interest rate
hedging policy which permits Buckeye to enter into certain short-term interest rate hedge
agreements to manage its interest rate and cash flow risks associated with its Credit Facility. In
addition, in July 2009, Buckeye GPs Board of Directors authorized Buckeye to enter into certain
transactions, such as forward starting interest rate swaps, to manage its interest rate and cash
flow risks related to certain expected debt issuances associated with the maturity of an existing
debt obligation.
At March 31, 2010, Buckeye had total fixed-rate debt obligations at face value of $1,425.0
million, consisting of $125.0 million of the 5.125% Notes, $275.0 million of the 5.300% Notes,
$300.0 million of the 4.625% Notes, $150.0 million of the 6.750% Notes, $300.0 million of the
6.050% Notes and $275.0 million of the 5.500% Notes. The fair value of these fixed-rate debt
obligations at March 31, 2010 was approximately $1,473.9 million. Buckeye estimates that a 1%
decrease in rates for obligations of similar maturities would increase the fair value of its
fixed-rate debt obligations by approximately $89.3 million.
At March 31, 2010, Buckeyes variable-rate obligations were $20.0 million under its Credit
Facility and $183.5 million under the BES Credit Agreement. Based on the balances outstanding at
March 31, 2010, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would
increase or decrease annual interest expense by approximately $2.0 million.
Buckeye expects to issue new fixed-rate debt (i) on or before July 15, 2013 to repay the
$300.0 million of 4.625% Notes that are due on July 15, 2013 and (ii) on or before October 15, 2014
to repay the $275.0 million of 5.300% Notes that are due on October 15, 2014, although no
assurances can be given that the issuance of fixed-rate debt will be possible on acceptable terms.
During 2009, Buckeye entered into four forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total aggregate
notional amount of $200.0 million related to the anticipated issuance of debt on or before July 15,
2013 and three forward-starting interest rate swaps with a total aggregate notional amount of
$150.0 million related to the anticipated issuance of debt on or before October 15, 2014. The
purpose of these swaps is to hedge the variability of the forecasted interest payments on these
expected debt issuances that may result from changes in the benchmark interest rate until the
expected debt is issued. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, unrealized losses of $1.3
million were recorded in Buckeyes accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to reflect the
change in the fair values of the forward-starting interest rate swaps. Buckeye designated the swap
agreements as cash flow hedges at inception and expects the changes in values to be highly
correlated with the changes in value of the underlying borrowings.
43
The following table presents the effect of hypothetical price movements on the estimated fair
value of Buckeyes interest rate swap portfolio and the related change in fair value of the
underlying debt at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
|
|
Resulting |
|
Portfolio |
|
Scenario |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair value assuming no
change in underlying
interest rates (as is) |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
15,900 |
|
Fair value assuming 10%
increase in underlying
interest rates |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
28,824 |
|
Fair value assuming 10%
decrease in underlying
interest rates |
|
Asset |
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and Chief
Financial Officer (the CFO), evaluated the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the
CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report are designed and operating effectively to provide reasonable assurance that
the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management,
including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A
controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls
system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) |
|
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. |
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or in other factors during the first
quarter of 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information on legal proceedings, see Part 1, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 3,
Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this quarterly report, which is incorporated into this item by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Security holders and potential investors in our securities should carefully consider the risk
factors set forth in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 in addition to other information in such report and in this quarterly
report. We have identified these risk factors as important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any written or oral forward-looking statements
made by us or on our behalf.
44
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated, effective as of January 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 of Buckeye Partners, L.P.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009). |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
MainLine Management LLC,
|
|
|
|
as General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Keith E. St.Clair
|
|
|
|
Keith E. St.Clair |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Principal
Financial Officer) |
|
46