Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-12110
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Texas
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
76-6088377
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1300 |
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
77046 |
(Address of principle executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 354-2500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
On
November 1, 2010, 68,677,146 common shares of the registrant were outstanding.
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate assets, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
763,559 |
|
|
$ |
747,921 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
4,613,036 |
|
|
|
4,512,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,376,595 |
|
|
|
5,260,045 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,263,173 |
) |
|
|
(1,149,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating real estate assets |
|
|
4,113,422 |
|
|
|
4,110,989 |
|
Properties under development, including land |
|
|
198,377 |
|
|
|
201,581 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
33,226 |
|
|
|
43,542 |
|
Properties held for sale |
|
|
9,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate assets |
|
|
4,354,762 |
|
|
|
4,356,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
32,269 |
|
|
|
36,112 |
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
17,509 |
|
|
|
45,847 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
105,950 |
|
|
|
102,114 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
91,071 |
|
|
|
64,156 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
5,174 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,606,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,607,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
$ |
1,507,858 |
|
|
$ |
1,645,926 |
|
Secured |
|
|
1,034,354 |
|
|
|
979,273 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
82,598 |
|
|
|
74,420 |
|
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
40,340 |
|
|
|
23,241 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
34,548 |
|
|
|
33,025 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
144,146 |
|
|
|
145,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,843,844 |
|
|
|
2,901,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred units |
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value per share;
100,000 shares authorized; 83,129 and 79,543 issued; 80,381 and
76,996 outstanding, respectively |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,673,606 |
|
|
|
2,525,656 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(580,046 |
) |
|
|
(492,571 |
) |
Notes receivable secured by common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Treasury shares, at cost (12,766 and 12,897 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(461,255 |
) |
|
|
(462,188 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(41,302 |
) |
|
|
(41,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
1,591,807 |
|
|
|
1,530,411 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
73,159 |
|
|
|
78,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,664,966 |
|
|
|
1,609,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,606,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,607,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Property revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
133,601 |
|
|
$ |
132,758 |
|
|
$ |
395,258 |
|
|
$ |
403,248 |
|
Other property revenues |
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
|
22,467 |
|
|
|
65,519 |
|
|
|
64,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
156,276 |
|
|
|
155,225 |
|
|
|
460,777 |
|
|
|
467,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
47,430 |
|
|
|
46,266 |
|
|
|
135,844 |
|
|
|
132,285 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
16,817 |
|
|
|
17,803 |
|
|
|
53,359 |
|
|
|
54,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property expenses |
|
|
64,247 |
|
|
|
64,069 |
|
|
|
189,203 |
|
|
|
186,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
6,028 |
|
|
|
6,093 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
Income on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
10,594 |
|
|
|
16,834 |
|
|
|
20,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
14,994 |
|
|
|
13,848 |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,568 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
22,339 |
|
|
|
23,010 |
|
Interest |
|
|
31,781 |
|
|
|
31,117 |
|
|
|
95,078 |
|
|
|
97,364 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
43,685 |
|
|
|
42,697 |
|
|
|
129,963 |
|
|
|
130,197 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
Expense on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
97,081 |
|
|
|
95,673 |
|
|
|
275,427 |
|
|
|
281,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of properties, including land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
4,218 |
|
|
|
6,039 |
|
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
16,804 |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
5,913 |
|
|
|
11,146 |
|
|
|
16,032 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
11,861 |
|
|
|
35,184 |
|
Less income allocated to noncontrolling interests
from continuing operations |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
28,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
67,898 |
|
|
|
61,087 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive equivalent
common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,441 |
|
|
|
66,602 |
|
|
|
68,169 |
|
|
|
61,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
$ |
5,913 |
|
|
$ |
11,146 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
Less income allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
28,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,832 |
|
|
$ |
6,192 |
|
|
$ |
11,861 |
|
|
$ |
35,184 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
(5,323 |
) |
|
|
(8,732 |
) |
|
|
(19,549 |
) |
|
|
(10,307 |
) |
Reclassification of net losses on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
17,488 |
|
|
|
16,442 |
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
41,319 |
|
Less income allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
5,922 |
|
|
$ |
34,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
secured by |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beneficial |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
in excess of |
|
|
common |
|
|
shares, at |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
interest |
|
|
capital |
|
|
net income |
|
|
shares |
|
|
cost |
|
|
loss |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
2,525,656 |
|
|
$ |
(492,571 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(462,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,155 |
) |
|
$ |
78,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,013 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
134,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions of operating partnership units |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
Distributions to common shareholders and
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,863 |
) |
|
|
(97,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
804 |
|
|
$ |
2,673,606 |
|
|
$ |
(580,046 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(461,255 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,302 |
) |
|
$ |
73,159 |
|
|
$ |
1,664,966 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
secured by |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
beneficial |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
in excess of |
|
|
common |
|
|
shares, at |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferred |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
interest |
|
|
capital |
|
|
net income |
|
|
shares |
|
|
cost |
|
|
loss |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
2,237,703 |
|
|
$ |
(312,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
$ |
(463,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,056 |
) |
|
$ |
89,862 |
|
|
$ |
1,501,356 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
29,934 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
272,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions and redemptions of
operating partnership units |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,777 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
Distributions to common shareholders and
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,934 |
) |
|
|
(104,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
2,522,525 |
|
|
$ |
(383,265 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(462,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,921 |
) |
|
$ |
81,851 |
|
|
$ |
1,714,671 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,861 |
|
|
$ |
35,184 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
129,419 |
|
|
|
128,797 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,887 |
) |
Gain on sale of properties, including land |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions of income from joint ventures |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
4,431 |
|
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
Interest from notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
8,502 |
|
|
|
7,035 |
|
Loss on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
Accretion of discount on unsecured notes payable |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
Net change in operating accounts |
|
|
21,483 |
|
|
|
22,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
$ |
178,461 |
|
|
$ |
185,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and capital improvements |
|
$ |
(43,927 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,068 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of properties, including land and discontinued operations, net |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
28,078 |
|
Payments received on notes receivable other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
Increase in notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(6,219 |
) |
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(5,094 |
) |
|
|
(22,796 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
(3,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
$ |
(50,059 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on unsecured line of credit |
|
$ |
37,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Repayments on unsecured line of credit |
|
|
(37,000 |
) |
|
|
(145,000 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(192,247 |
) |
|
|
(502,880 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
57,601 |
|
|
|
436,797 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net |
|
|
134,617 |
|
|
|
272,112 |
|
Distributions to common shareholders, perpetual preferred units,
and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(101,052 |
) |
|
|
(119,538 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(6,528 |
) |
|
|
(3,960 |
) |
Net decrease in accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
$ |
(101,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(60,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
26,915 |
|
|
|
74,276 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
64,156 |
|
|
|
7,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
91,071 |
|
|
$ |
81,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
|
$ |
87,116 |
|
|
$ |
94,443 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared but not paid |
|
$ |
34,548 |
|
|
$ |
33,028 |
|
Value of shares issued under benefit plans, net of cancellations |
|
|
14,465 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
Conversion of operating partnership units to common shares |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
3,753 |
|
Accrual associated with construction and capital expenditures |
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
Conversion of mezzanine notes to joint venture equity |
|
|
28,944 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
Change in fair value of available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of joint venture at fair value, net of cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate assets, net |
|
|
92,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
In-place leases |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt assumed |
|
|
52,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Business. Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust
(REIT), is engaged in the ownership, development, construction, and management of multifamily
apartment communities. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as communities,
multifamily communities, properties, or multifamily properties in the following discussion.
As of September 30, 2010, we owned interests in or operated 189 multifamily properties comprising
64,681 apartment homes across the United States. In addition, we own other land parcels we may
develop into multifamily apartment communities; one multifamily property comprised of 602 apartment
homes was designated as held for sale.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Principles of Consolidation. Our condensed consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries and joint ventures (including partnerships and
limited liability companies) over which we have control. All intercompany transactions, balances,
and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments acquired or created are continuously
evaluated based on the accounting guidance relating to variable interest entities (VIEs), which
requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. If the
investment is determined not to be a VIE, then the investment is evaluated for consolidation
(primarily using a voting interest model) under the remaining consolidation guidance relating to
real estate. If we are the general partner of a limited partnership, or manager of a limited
liability company, we also consider the consolidation guidance relating to the rights of limited
partners (non-managing members) to assess whether any rights held by the limited partners overcome
the presumption of control by us.
Interim Financial Reporting. We have prepared these financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial statements and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Accordingly, these statements do not include all information and footnote
disclosures required for annual financial statements. While we believe the disclosures presented
are adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in our 2009 Form 10-K. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair representation of our financial statements for the interim period
reported have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the full year.
Asset Impairment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Impairment exists if estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with long-lived assets are
not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets. We consider projected future
discounted and undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development
plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. When impairment
exists, the long-lived asset is adjusted to its fair value. While we believe our estimates of
future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding a number of factors, including
market rents, economic conditions, and occupancies, could significantly affect these estimates. In
estimating fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, and discounted cash flow
calculations which maximize inputs from a marketplace participants perspective.
In addition, we evaluate our investments in joint ventures and mezzanine construction
financing and if, with respect to investments, we believe there is an other than temporary decline
in market value, or if, with respect to mezzanine loans, it is probable we will not collect all
amounts due in accordance with the terms, we will record an impairment charge based on these
evaluations. In general, we provide mezzanine loans to affiliated joint ventures constructing or
operating multifamily assets. While we believe it is currently probable we will collect all amounts
due with respect to these mezzanine loans, changes in market conditions related to credit markets
and real estate market fundamentals inject a significant amount of uncertainty into the
environment. Any adverse economic or market development may cause us to re-evaluate our
conclusions and could result in material impairment charges with respect to our mezzanine loans.
10
The value of our properties under development depends on market conditions, including
estimates of the project start date as well as estimates of demand for multifamily communities. We
have reviewed market trends and other marketplace information and have incorporated this
information as well as our current outlook into the assumptions we use in our impairment analyses.
Due to, among other factors, the judgment and assumptions applied in the impairment analyses and
the fact limited market information regarding the value of comparable land exists at this time, it
is possible actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets, properties under
development, and land is currently recoverable. However, if market conditions deteriorate or if
changes in our development strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value
calculations, we may need to take material charges in future periods for impairments related to
existing assets. Any such material non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. All cash and investments in money market accounts and other highly
liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to
be cash and cash equivalents. We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents at major
financial institutions in the United States and deposits with these financial institutions may
exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, we regularly monitor the
financial stability of these financial institutions and believe we are not currently exposed to any
significant default risk with respect to these deposits.
Cost Capitalization. Real estate assets are carried at cost plus capitalized carrying
charges. Carrying charges are primarily interest and real estate taxes which are capitalized as
part of properties under development. Capitalized interest is generally based on the weighted
average interest rate of our unsecured debt. Transaction and restructuring costs associated with
the acquisition of real estate assets are expensed. Expenditures directly related to the
development and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land and buildings and
improvements. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits and other related costs
directly attributable to the development of properties, are also capitalized. All construction and
carrying costs are capitalized and reported in the balance sheet as properties under development
until the apartment homes are substantially completed. Upon substantial completion of the apartment
homes, the total cost for the apartment homes and the associated land is transferred to buildings
and improvements and land, respectively.
As discussed above, carrying charges are principally interest and real estate taxes
capitalized as part of properties under development and buildings and improvements. Capitalized
interest was approximately $1.3 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and approximately $2.7 million and $7.6 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Capitalized real estate taxes were
approximately $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively, and approximately $0.4 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
Where possible, we stage our construction to allow leasing and occupancy during the
construction period, which we believe minimizes the duration of the lease-up period following
completion of construction. Our accounting policy related to properties in the development and
leasing phase is to expense all operating expenses associated with completed apartment homes. We
capitalize renovation and improvement costs we believe extend the economic lives of depreciable
property. Capital expenditures subsequent to initial construction are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives.
Depreciation and amortization is computed over the expected useful lives of depreciable
property on a straight-line basis with lives generally as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Useful Life |
Buildings and improvements |
|
5-35 years |
Furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other |
|
3-20 years |
Intangible assets (in-place leases and above and below market leases) |
|
underlying lease term |
Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value and we do not apply master netting for financial
reporting purposes. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the
intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging
relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the
criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of
the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows or other types of forecasted
transactions are cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the
timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes
attributable to the earnings effect of the hedged transactions. We may enter into derivative
contracts which are intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though hedge
accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
11
Income Recognition. Our rental and other property revenue is recorded when due from residents
and is recognized monthly as it is earned. Other property revenue consists primarily of utility
rebillings and administrative, application, and other transactional fees charged to our residents.
Our apartment homes are rented to residents on lease terms generally ranging from six to fifteen
months, with monthly payments due in advance. All sources of income, including from interest and
fee and asset management income, are recognized as earned. Nine of our properties are subject to
rent control. Operations of multifamily properties acquired are recorded from the date of
acquisition in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. In managements opinion, due
to the number of residents, the types and diversity of submarkets in which the properties operate,
and the collection terms, there is no significant concentration of credit risk.
Other Assets, Net. Other assets in our consolidated financial statements include investments
under deferred compensation plans, deferred financing costs, non-real estate leasehold improvements
and equipment, prepaid expenses, the value of in-place leases net of related accumulated
amortization, available-for-sale investments, and other miscellaneous receivables.
Available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders equity.
Reportable Segments. Our multifamily communities are geographically diversified throughout
the United States, and management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level.
As each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products
and services, our apartment communities have been aggregated into one reportable segment. Our
multifamily communities generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of apartment
homes, which comprises approximately 98% of our total property revenues and total non-property
income, excluding income on deferred compensation plans, for all periods presented.
Use of Estimates. In the application of GAAP, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, results of operations during the reporting periods, and related disclosures.
Our more significant estimates include estimates supporting our impairment analysis related to the
carrying values of our real estate assets, estimates related to the valuation of our investments in
joint ventures and mezzanine financing, and estimates of expected losses of potential variable
interest entities. These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events rarely develop exactly as
forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities, which codified the previously issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R. ASU 2009-17 changes the consolidation
analysis for VIEs and requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of the
VIE. The determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether the entity has the
power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and has the
obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, of the VIE which could potentially
be significant to the VIE. The ASU requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary
and also amends the events triggering a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. ASU 2009-17
requires additional disclosures for VIEs, including disclosures about a reporting entitys
involvement with VIEs, how a reporting entitys involvement with a VIE affects the reporting
entitys financial statements, and significant judgments and assumptions made by the reporting
entity to determine whether it must consolidate the VIE. ASU 2009-17 was effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. Our adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material effect on our financial
statements, but could potentially have a material impact on future reconsideration events and
subsequent reassessment of VIE status.
12
3. Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share are computed using net income attributable to common shareholders and
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect common
shares issuable from the assumed conversion of common share options and share awards granted and
units convertible into common shares. Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic
earnings per share are included in diluted earnings per share. Our unvested share-based awards are
considered participating securities and are reflected in the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share using the two-class method. The number of common share equivalent securities
excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation was approximately 4.7 million and 5.0
million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and was approximately 4.9 million for
both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. These securities, which include common
share options and share awards granted and units convertible into common shares, were excluded from
the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were determined to be anti-dilutive.
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per
share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
3,658 |
|
|
$ |
5,354 |
|
|
$ |
9,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders,
net of amount allocated to participating securities |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
3,655 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
9,108 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted basic |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
$ |
5,975 |
|
|
$ |
28,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders,
as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
67,898 |
|
|
|
61,087 |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders,
net of amount allocated to participating securities |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
3,655 |
|
|
$ |
5,260 |
|
|
$ |
9,108 |
|
Income allocated to common units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders,
as adjusted |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
3,664 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
9,137 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,943 |
|
|
$ |
5,975 |
|
|
$ |
28,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders,
as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale,
attributable to common shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
67,898 |
|
|
|
61,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and share awards granted |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Common units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive equivalent
common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,441 |
|
|
|
66,602 |
|
|
|
68,169 |
|
|
|
61,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Common Shares
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110 million shares of
beneficial interest, consisting of 100 million common shares and 10 million preferred shares. As of
September 30, 2010, we had approximately 67.6 million common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and no preferred shares
outstanding.
In March 2010, we announced the creation of an at-the-market (ATM) share offering program
through which we may, but have no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering
price of up to $250 million, in amounts and at times as we determine, into the existing trading
market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Actual sales will
depend on a variety of factors we determine from time to time including, among others, market
conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and determinations of the appropriate sources
of funding for us.
The following table presents activity under our ATM share offering program for the periods
presented (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares sold |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Total net consideration |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
134.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per share |
|
$ |
48.05 |
|
|
$ |
46.91 |
|
14
During the fourth quarter of 2010, we issued approximately 1.0 million common shares at an
average price of $49.25 per share for total net consideration of approximately $50.4 million. As
of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $61.9
million remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
5. Investments in Joint Ventures
As of September 30, 2010, our equity investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which we
account for utilizing the equity method of accounting, consisted of 23 joint ventures, with our
ownership percentages ranging from 15% to 72%. We provide property management services to the
majority of these joint ventures which own
operating properties and may provide construction and development services to the joint
ventures which own properties under development. The following table summarizes aggregate balance
sheet and statement of income data for the unconsolidated joint ventures as of and for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,121.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,202.0 |
|
Total third-party debt |
|
|
949.9 |
|
|
|
980.9 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
134.6 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
$ |
103.6 |
|
|
$ |
103.2 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
Equity in income (loss) (1) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures excludes our ownership interest of
fee income from various property management services and interest income from mezzanine loans with
our joint ventures. |
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. We have guaranteed no more than our proportionate interest, totaling
approximately $47.8 million, of four loans utilized for construction and development activities for
our joint ventures.
Mezzanine loans we have made to affiliate joint ventures are recorded as Notes receivable
affiliates as discussed in Note 6, Notes Receivable.
We may earn fees for property and asset management, construction, development, and other
services related primarily to joint ventures in which we own an interest. Fees earned for these
services amounted to approximately $2.1 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and approximately $6.0 million and $6.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. We eliminate fee income
from property management services provided to these joint ventures to the extent of our ownership.
On April 15, 2010, a $24.5 million secured third-party construction note made by one of our
joint ventures which owns a multifamily property located in Houston, Texas, originally scheduled to
mature in April 2010, was contractually extended to April 2011. Concurrent with the construction
note extension, our $8.2 million mezzanine loan to this joint venture was converted into an
additional common equity interest in the amount of $7.2 million (with a preference on distribution
of cash flows) and the remaining $1.0 million was converted into an additional equity interest in
the joint venture.
In July 2010, we acquired two multifamily properties for approximately $41 million on behalf
of one of our discretionary investment funds (the Funds) in which we have a 20% ownership
interest. One property is comprised of 306 units located in Houston, Texas and the second property
is a 110 unit substantially complete development community located in Atlanta, Georgia.
15
In August 2010, the ownership of one of our joint ventures, which owns a multifamily property
located in Irvine, California, was restructured and resulted in our ownership interest increasing
from 30% to 99.99%. We previously accounted for this joint venture in accordance with the equity
method of accounting. Following this restructuring, we have consolidated this entity for financial
reporting purposes. At the time of this restructuring, we recorded the assets and liabilities of the
joint venture at fair value, which has resulted in an increase of net real estate assets of
approximately $92.7 million and a reduction to investments in joint ventures and notes
receivable-affiliates of approximately $21.2 million and $20.7 million, respectively. We did not
record a gain or loss on this restructuring as the net consideration approximated the fair market
value of the net assets received. Subsequent to this restructuring, we repaid the joint ventures
existing $52.1 million secured note, which accrued interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%, and the joint
venture entered into a 35 year secured credit agreement with a third-party lender in the amount of
$53.0 million with an effective annual interest rate of 4.35%.
6. Notes Receivable
Notes Receivable affiliates. We provide mezzanine financing with rates ranging from the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 3% to a fixed maximum rate of 12% per year, to certain
of our joint ventures. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the balance of Notes
receivable affiliates totaled approximately $17.5 million and $45.8 million, respectively, on
notes maturing through 2019. We eliminate the interest income to the extent of our percentage
ownership in the joint ventures. We have reviewed the terms and conditions underlying these notes
receivable and believe these notes are collectible and no impairment existed at September 30, 2010.
At September 30, 2010, our commitment to fund additional amounts under the mezzanine loans was
an aggregate of approximately $6.0 million.
7. Notes Payable
The following is a summary of our indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$500 million term loan, due 2012 |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$250.0 million 4.39% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
$100.0 million 6.75% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
$150.0 million 7.69% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
$200.0 million 5.93% Notes, due 2012 |
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
$200.0 million 5.45% Notes, due 2013 |
|
|
199.6 |
|
|
|
199.4 |
|
$250.0 million 5.08% Notes, due 2015 |
|
|
249.2 |
|
|
|
249.0 |
|
$300.0 million 5.75% Notes, due 2017 |
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
972.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,084.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0 million 4.90% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
$14.5 million 6.79% Notes, due 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
$35.0 million 4.99% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unsecured notes payable |
|
$ |
1,507.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,645.9 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Secured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.18% 6.00% Conventional Mortgage Notes, due 2011 2045 |
|
$ |
993.8 |
|
|
$ |
937.8 |
|
1.72% Tax-exempt Mortgage Note due 2028 |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,034.4 |
|
|
$ |
979.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
2,542.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,625.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate debt included in secured notes (1.18% 1.71%) |
|
$ |
189.8 |
|
|
$ |
186.9 |
|
Floating rate tax-exempt debt included in secured notes (1.72%) |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
In August 2010, we entered into a $500 million unsecured credit facility, with the ability to
further increase to $600 million, which matures in August 2012 and may be extended at our option to
August 2013. This facility replaced our $600 million unsecured credit facility which was scheduled
to mature in January 2011. Interest rate spreads float on a margin based on LIBOR and are subject
to change as our credit ratings change. Advances under the line of credit may be priced at the
scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the
scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of 180 days or less and may not exceed the lesser
of $250 million or the remaining amount available under the line of credit. The line of credit is
subject to customary financial covenants and limitations, all of which we are in compliance.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At September 30, 2010, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.2 million, leaving approximately $489.8 million
available under our unsecured line of credit.
Subsequent to the restructuring of one of our unconsolidated joint ventures in August 2010,
this now fully consolidated joint venture entered into a 35 year secured credit agreement with a
third-party lender in the amount of $53.0 million with an effective annual interest rate of 4.35%.
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures, for further discussion of this transaction.
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the weighted average interest rate on our floating rate debt,
which includes our unsecured line of credit, was approximately 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repaid the remaining principal amount of our
$250 million, 4.39% senior unsecured notes which matured on January 15, 2010 for a total of
approximately $55.3 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we repaid the
remaining amounts outstanding on our $10.0 million, 4.90% and $14.5 million, 6.79% medium-term
notes and our $100.0 million, 6.75% fixed-rate notes maturing in 2010 for a total of approximately
$82.3 million. We have no scheduled debt maturities for the remainder of 2010.
17
Our indebtedness, including our unsecured line of credit, had a weighted average maturity of
approximately 5.7 years at September 30, 2010. Scheduled repayments on outstanding debt assuming
all contractual extensions, including our line of credit and scheduled principal amortizations, and
the weighted average interest rate on maturing debt at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
(in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
* |
|
|
|
% |
2011 |
|
|
158.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
2012 |
|
|
762.7 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2013 |
|
|
228.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2014 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
1,380.9 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,542.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
This balance consists entirely of scheduled principal amortizations. |
8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. We are exposed to certain risks arising from
both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a
wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities.
We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by
managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and the use of derivative financial
instruments. Specifically, we may enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures
arising from business activities resulting in differences in the amount, timing, and duration of
our known or expected cash payments principally related to our borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are
to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To
accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable rate amounts
from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of
variable rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the
contract in exchange for an up front premium.
Designated Hedges. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
or loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period the hedged forecasted
transaction affects earnings. Over the next twelve months, we estimate an additional $23.0 million
will be reclassified to interest expense. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing
variable rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives, if
any, is recognized directly in earnings. No portion was ineffective during the three or nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
2
|
|
$ |
516.6 million |
Non-designated Hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used
to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks. Non-designated
hedges are either specifically non-designated by management or do not meet strict hedge accounting
requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are
recorded directly in earnings in other income or other expense.
18
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivative which was
not designated as a hedge of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
|
1
|
|
$ |
175.0 million |
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as
their classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in millions):
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
Derivatives
not
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present the effect of our derivative financial instruments on the condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
Effect of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Income on Derivative (Ineffective |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
(OCI) on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
into Income (Effective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Portion and Amount Excluded from |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain/Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
Derivatives not designated as |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Derivative |
|
hedging
instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other income/expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Income on Derivative (Ineffective |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
(OCI) on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
into Income (Effective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Portion and Amount Excluded from |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
(19.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.3 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain/Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
Derivatives not designated as |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Derivative |
|
hedging instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other income/expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features. Derivative financial investments expose us to credit
risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate
hedge agreements. We believe we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by transacting with
major creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our on-going control procedures, we monitor
the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, which we believe
minimizes credit risk concentration. We believe the likelihood of realized losses from
counterparty non-performance is remote.
Our agreements with each of our derivative counterparties contain provisions which provide the
counterparty the right to declare a default on our derivative obligations if we are in default on
any of our indebtedness, subject to certain thresholds. For all instances, these provisions
include a default even if there is no acceleration of the indebtedness. Our agreements with each
of our derivative counterparties also provide if we consolidate with, merge with or into, or
transfer all or substantially all our assets to another entity and the creditworthiness of the
resulting, surviving, or transferee entity is materially weaker than ours, the counterparty has the
right to terminate the derivative obligations.
At September 30, 2010, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which
includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk (the termination
value), related to these agreements was approximately $45.0 million. As of September 30, 2010, we
had not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If we were in breach of any of these
provisions at September 30, 2010, or terminated these agreements, we would have been required to
settle our obligations at their aggregate termination value of approximately $45.0 million.
9. Share-based Compensation
Options. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 0.1 million options
were exercised at prices ranging from $25.88 to $42.90 per option. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1.4 million.
As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $2.5 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested options, which is expected to be amortized over the next four years.
20
The following table summarizes share options outstanding and exercisable at September 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options (1) |
|
|
Exercisable Options (1) |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Contractual |
|
Range of Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Life |
|
Prices |
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(Years) |
|
$30.06$41.91 |
|
|
609,076 |
|
|
$ |
33.03 |
|
|
|
217,469 |
|
|
$ |
38.39 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
$42.90$44.00 |
|
|
508,835 |
|
|
|
43.32 |
|
|
|
452,940 |
|
|
|
43.25 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
$45.53$73.32 |
|
|
728,124 |
|
|
|
49.57 |
|
|
|
498,412 |
|
|
|
50.29 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options |
|
|
1,846,035 |
|
|
$ |
42.39 |
|
|
|
1,168,821 |
|
|
$ |
45.34 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options and exercisable options at
September 30, 2010 was approximately $11.9 million and $4.7 million, respectively. The
aggregate intrinsic values were calculated as the excess, if any, between our closing share
price of $47.97 per share on September 30, 2010 and the strike price of the underlying
award. |
Valuation Assumptions. Options generally have a vesting period of three to five years. We
estimate the fair values of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The following assumptions were used for options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 (no additional options have been granted as of September 30, 2010):
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$11.69 |
Expected volatility |
|
35.6% 39.2% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.6% 3.7% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
4.1% 4.4% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
7.0 9.0 |
Our computation of expected volatility for 2010 is based on the historical volatility of our
common shares over a time period equal to the expected life of the option and ending on the grant
date. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield on our common
shares is estimated using the annual dividends paid in the prior year and the market price on the
date of grant. Our computation of expected life for 2010 is estimated based on historical
experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the share-based
awards.
Share Awards and Vesting. Share awards generally have a vesting period of five years. The
compensation cost for share awards is based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant
and is amortized over the vesting period. To estimate forfeitures, we use actual forfeiture
history. At September 30, 2010, the unamortized value of previously issued unvested share awards
was approximately $24.9 million. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $10.1 million and $9.4 million, respectively.
21
The following table summarizes activity under our 1993 and 2002 Share Incentive Plans for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise / |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Exercise / |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,974,212 |
|
|
$ |
41.40 |
|
|
|
2,852,545 |
|
|
$ |
39.66 |
|
Vested share awards at December 31, 2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,257,392 |
) |
|
|
34.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and nonvested share awards
outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,974,212 |
|
|
$ |
41.40 |
|
|
|
595,153 |
|
|
$ |
46.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
55,895 |
|
|
|
43.94 |
|
|
|
371,436 |
|
|
|
40.01 |
|
Exercised/Vested |
|
|
(134,201 |
) |
|
|
31.98 |
|
|
|
(206,593 |
) |
|
|
49.01 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(49,871 |
) |
|
|
46.85 |
|
|
|
(8,214 |
) |
|
|
39.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net activity |
|
|
(128,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options and nonvested share awards
outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,846,035 |
|
|
$ |
42.39 |
|
|
|
751,782 |
|
|
$ |
42.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Balance includes 76,563 shares which do not impact compensation expense. |
10. Net Change in Operating Accounts
The effect of changes in the operating accounts on cash flows from operating activities is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Change in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
(6,262 |
) |
|
$ |
5,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
(2,278 |
) |
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
16,938 |
|
|
|
19,081 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating accounts |
|
$ |
21,483 |
|
|
$ |
22,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Construction Contracts. As of September 30, 2010, we were obligated for approximately $62.7
million of additional expenditures on our construction projects currently under development. We
expect to fund these amounts through available cash balances and draws on our unsecured line of
credit.
Litigation. We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the
ordinary course of business. Matters which arise out of allegations of bodily injury, property
damage, and employment practices are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these
legal proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final
outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
22
Other Contingencies. In the ordinary course of our business, we issue letters of intent
indicating a willingness to negotiate for acquisitions, dispositions, or joint ventures and also
enter into arrangements contemplating various transactions. Such letters of intent and other
arrangements are non-binding as to either party unless and until a definitive contract is entered
into by the parties. Even if definitive contracts relating to the purchase or sale of real
property are entered into, these contracts generally provide the purchaser with time to evaluate
the property and conduct due diligence, during which periods the purchaser will have the ability to
terminate the contracts without penalty or forfeiture of any deposit or earnest money. There can be
no assurance definitive contracts will be entered into with respect to any matter covered by
letters of intent or we will
consummate any transaction contemplated by any definitive contract. Furthermore, due
diligence periods for real property are frequently extended as needed. An acquisition or sale of
real property becomes probable at the time the due diligence period expires and the definitive
contract has not been terminated. We are then at risk under a real property acquisition contract,
but generally only to the extent of any earnest money deposits associated with the contract, and
are obligated to sell under a real property sales contract.
Lease Commitments. At September 30, 2010, we had long-term leases covering certain land,
office facilities, and equipment. Rental expense totaled approximately $0.7 million for both the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and approximately $2.2 million and $2.3 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments
for the remainder of 2010 are approximately $0.7 million, and for the years ending December 31,
2011 through 2014 are approximately $2.5 million, $2.1 million, $1.9 million, and $1.8 million,
respectively, and approximately $1.7 million in the aggregate thereafter.
Investments in Joint Ventures. We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter
into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which we own
an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or communities owned directly by
the joint venture or partnership. Our decision whether to hold the entire interest in an apartment
community ourselves, or to have an indirect interest in the community through a joint venture or
partnership, is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) our projection, in
some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk
if a joint venture or partnership vehicle is used; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of
communities by market; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain
liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) the economic and tax terms required by a seller of
land or of a community, who may prefer or who may require less payment if the land or community is
contributed to a joint venture or partnership. Investments in joint ventures or partnerships are
not limited to a specified percentage of our assets. Each joint venture or partnership agreement is
individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole
discretion is limited to varying degrees in our existing joint venture agreements and may be
limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of future joint venture agreements.
12. Income Taxes
We have maintained and intend to maintain our election as a REIT under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends
to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard
to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. As a REIT, we generally will not be
subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate level to the extent such
income is distributed to our shareholders annually. If our taxable income exceeds our dividends in
a tax year, REIT tax rules allow us to designate dividends from the subsequent tax year in order to
avoid current taxation on undistributed income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates, including
any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, we may not be able to requalify as a REIT for
the four subsequent taxable years. Historically, we have incurred only state and local income,
franchise, and excise taxes. Taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT
subsidiaries is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income taxes. Our operating
partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity
level. We have provided for income, franchise, and state income taxes in the condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. These taxes are primarily for entity level taxes on certain ventures,
state taxes, and federal taxes on certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We have no significant
temporary differences or tax credits associated with our taxable REIT subsidiaries.
We believe we have no uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits requiring
disclosure as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
23
13. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, income from discontinued
operations included the results of operations of one operating property, placed in service in 1986
and comprised of 602 apartment homes, classified as held for sale. As of September 30, 2010, this
property had an approximate net book value of $9.7 million. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, income from discontinued operations also included the results of operations of
one operating property sold in 2009 through its sale date in the second quarter of 2009. We
received net proceeds of approximately $28.0 million and recognized a gain of
approximately $16.9 million from the sale of the property to an unaffiliated third party.
There were no sales of operating properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations, excluding gain on sale of
discontinued operations, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
$ |
5,752 |
|
Property expenses |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Fair Value Disclosures
For financial assets and liabilities fair valued on a recurring basis, fair value is the price
we would receive to sell an asset, or pay to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction with a
market participant at the measurement date. In the absence of such data, fair value is estimated
using internal information consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical
transaction which occurs at the transaction date.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable
inputs reflect our market assumptions; preference is given to observable inputs. These two types
of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value
drivers are observable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable. |
The following table presents information about our financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 under the fair value hierarchy
discussed above (there was no Level 3 activity during the periods presented).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
Available-for-sale investment |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
24
Deferred Compensation Plan Investments. The estimated fair values of investment securities
classified as deferred compensation plan investments are included in Level 1 and are based on
quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same transactions or information provided
through third-party advisors. Our deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in other
assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The balance at September 30, 2010 also
reflects approximately $16.1 million of participant withdrawals from our deferred compensation plan
investments during 2010.
Available-for-sale Investments. A company in which we had invested approximately $0.2 million
completed an initial public offering during the three months ending September 30, 2010. We have
classified this investment as available-for-sale under the Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) and recorded these securities as a component of other assets, with any unrealized
gains or losses, net of tax, included in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The available-for-sale investments are
included in Level 1 in the preceding table and are valued using quoted market prices. The
following table sets forth the maturity, cost, gross unrealized gains, and fair value of our
available-for-sale investment held as of September 30, 2010 (we did not have any available-for-sale
investments at December 31, 2009):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
Cost |
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities with no maturity date |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
(1) |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unrealized gain of approximately $2.9 million is partially offset by approximately
$1.0 million of deferred income tax. |
Derivative Financial Instruments. The estimated fair values of derivative financial
instruments are included in Level 2 and are valued using widely accepted valuation techniques
including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This
analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair
values of interest rate swaps and caps are estimated using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The
variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from
observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider
the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to
account for potential nonperformance risk, both our own nonperformance risk and the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk. The fair value of interest rate caps are determined using the
market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts which would occur if
variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used
in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest
rates derived from observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.
Although we have determined the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our
derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the
likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of September 30, 2010, we have
assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall
valuation of our derivative positions and have determined the credit valuation adjustments are not
significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined our
derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Fair Value Disclosures. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying
value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities, and distributions payable approximated their fair value based on
the short-term nature of these instruments.
25
In calculating the fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable, interest rates and
spreads reflect current creditworthiness and market conditions available for the issuance of notes
receivable and notes payable with similar terms and remaining maturities. In instances where market
conditions are not available, we follow the guidance of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Topic of the Codification to estimate fair value in a non-active market. The following table
presents the carrying and estimated fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in millions) |
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
Fixed rate notes payable (1) |
|
|
2,311.8 |
|
|
|
2,423.6 |
|
|
|
2,396.8 |
|
|
|
2,380.9 |
|
Floating rate notes payable |
|
|
230.4 |
|
|
|
193.5 |
|
|
|
228.4 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a $500 million term loan entered into in 2007 and $16.6
million of a construction loan entered into in 2008 which are fixed by
the use of interest rate swaps but evaluated for estimated fair value
at the floating rate. |
Nonrecurring Fair Value Disclosures. Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
measured on a nonrecurring basis primarily relate to impairment of long-lived assets or
investments. There were no events during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 which required
fair value adjustments of our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.
15. Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in our ownership interest in subsidiaries
on the equity attributable to us for the nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
28,486 |
|
Transfers from the noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in equity for conversion of operating partnership units |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
Increase in equity from purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in common shareholders equity and net transfers
from noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
8,201 |
|
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report, as well as Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Historical results and trends which might appear in the condensed consolidated financial statements
should not be interpreted as being indicative of future operations.
We consider portions of this report to be forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as
amended, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not
discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections,
intentions, or other items relating to the future; forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance, results, or events. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our
forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance our
expectations will be achieved. Any statements contained herein which are not statements of
historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on
these forward-looking statements as they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and
other factors beyond our control and could differ materially from our actual results and
performance.
Factors which may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those
contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
volatility in capital and credit markets could adversely impact us; |
|
|
|
we could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; |
|
|
|
unfavorable changes in economic conditions could adversely impact occupancy or rental
rates; |
|
|
|
short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents; |
|
|
|
we face risks associated with land holdings and related activities; |
|
|
|
difficulties of selling real estate could limit our flexibility; |
|
|
|
compliance or failure to comply with laws requiring access to our properties by disabled
persons could result in substantial cost; |
|
|
|
competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental
income; |
|
|
|
development and construction risks could impact our profitability; |
|
|
|
our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected; |
|
|
|
competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties; |
|
|
|
losses from catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we
are the sole investor; |
|
|
|
we face risks associated with investments in and management of discretionary funds; |
|
|
|
we depend on our key personnel; |
|
|
|
changes in laws and litigation risks could affect our business; |
|
|
|
tax matters, including failure to qualify as a REIT, could have adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt
obligations or pay distributions to shareholders; |
|
|
|
we have significant debt, which could have important adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
we may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt; |
|
|
|
variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
we may incur losses on interest rate hedging arrangements; |
|
|
|
issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition; |
|
|
|
failure to maintain current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds,
related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets; |
|
|
|
share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent
takeovers beneficial to shareholders; |
|
|
|
our share price will fluctuate; and |
|
|
|
we may reduce dividends on our equity securities. |
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of
this report, and we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because
of subsequent events.
27
Executive Summary
We are primarily engaged in the ownership, development, construction, and management of
multifamily apartment communities. As of September 30, 2010, we owned interests in or operated 189
multifamily properties comprised of 64,681 apartment homes across the United States as detailed in
the following Property Portfolio table. In addition, we own other land parcels we may develop into
multifamily apartment communities.
The U.S. economy has experienced a significant recession. Record levels of job losses and high
unemployment rates impacted our business, resulting in declines in both rental rates and occupancy
levels. Despite unemployment rates remaining at high levels, our results for the most recent two
quarters reflect sequential rental revenue growth due to achieving higher rental rates and
improvements in occupancy. We believe the current positive trend is due in part to the continued
decline in home ownership rates and the limited supply of new rental housing construction. We
expect improvements in rental rates to continue in 2010 and believe sustained rental growth and
improvements in operating results will depend on, among other things, the timing and extent of
employment growth, supply levels of new multifamily housing, the continuation of declining home
ownership rate trends, and changing sentiment toward home ownership.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we acquired two multifamily properties for
approximately $41 million on behalf of one of the Funds in which we have a 20% ownership interest.
One property is comprised of 306 units located in Houston, Texas and the second property is a 110
unit substantially complete development community located in Atlanta, Georgia.
Additionally, during the third quarter of 2010 we began construction on two development
projects. As of September 30, 2010, we were obligated for approximately $62.7 million of
additional expenditures on these projects. We expect to fund these amounts through available cash
balances and draws on our unsecured line of credit. We expect to start one development project in
the fourth quarter of 2010. Upon completion of construction, which is expected to occur during
2012, these three projects will add approximately 700 apartment homes to our portfolio. We are
also evaluating the timing of additional development projects during fiscal year 2011 and beyond.
Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to look for opportunities to develop and
acquire existing communities through the Funds, expand our development pipeline, and complete
selective dispositions.
For the longer-term, we intend to continue to focus on strengthening our capital and liquidity
positions by generating positive cash flows from operations and reducing outstanding debt and
leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs. We intend to meet our long-term liquidity
requirements through available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our
unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions and secured mortgage notes, and the
use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, including under
our ATM share offering program.
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $91.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and
no balances outstanding on our $500 million unsecured line of credit. We have no scheduled debt
maturities for the remainder of 2010 and have approximately $158.5 million of debt maturities in
2011. We believe we are well-positioned with a strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity to
cover long-term debt maturities and new development funding requirements. We will, however,
continue to assess and take further actions where prudent to meet our long-term objectives and
capital requirements.
28
Property Portfolio
Our multifamily property portfolio, excluding land held for future development, is summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
Operating Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Houston, Texas (1) |
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Dallas, Texas (2) |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Washington, D.C. Metro |
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Tampa, Florida |
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Southeast Florida |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California (3) |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
San Diego/Inland Empire, California |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Properties |
|
|
63,964 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
63,286 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties Under Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C. Metro |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties |
|
|
64,681 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
63,658 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Properties (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Washington, D.C. Metro |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Properties |
|
|
12,944 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated Properties |
|
|
51,737 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
50,840 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Camden Travis Street, a fully-consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a 25%
ownership. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes one multifamily property comprised of 602 apartment homes designated as held for sale
as of September 30, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes Camden Main and Jamboree, a fully-consolidated joint venture, of which we retain
a 99.99% ownership. |
|
(4) |
|
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our unconsolidated joint venture investments. |
29
Stabilized Communities
We generally consider a property stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy at the beginning of
a period. Three of our recently completed properties reached stabilization during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Apartment |
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Date of |
|
Property and Location |
|
Homes |
|
|
Completion |
|
|
Stabilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Dulles Station |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak Hill, VA |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
1Q09 |
|
|
|
2Q10 |
|
Camden Amber Oaks joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
2Q09 |
|
|
|
2Q10 |
|
Camden Travis Street (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1Q10 |
|
|
|
3Q10 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Camden Travis Street is a fully-consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a 25% ownership. |
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
We intend to maintain a long-term strategy of managing our invested capital through the
selective sale of properties and expect to utilize the proceeds to reduce our outstanding debt and
leverage ratios and fund investments with higher anticipated growth prospects in our markets.
Income from discontinued operations includes the operations of properties, including land, sold
during the period or classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2010. The components of
earnings classified as discontinued operations include separately identifiable property-specific
revenues, expenses, depreciation, and interest expense. Any gain or loss on the disposal of the
properties held for sale, if any, is also classified as discontinued operations.
As of September 30, 2010, we had one operating property, placed in service in 1986 and
comprised of 602 apartment homes, held for sale with an approximate net book value of $9.7 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we received net proceeds of approximately $28.0
million and recognized a gain of approximately $16.9 million from the sale of one property to an
unaffiliated third party. There were no sales of operating properties during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Development and Lease-Up Properties
At September 30, 2010, we had two consolidated properties under construction as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Estimated |
|
($ in millions) |
|
Apartment |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Under |
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Date of |
|
Property and Location |
|
Homes |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Completion |
|
|
Stabilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Lake Nona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
420 |
|
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
|
3Q12 |
|
|
|
4Q14 |
|
Camden Summerfield II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landover,
MD |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3Q12 |
|
|
|
2Q13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
607 |
|
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
We did not have any consolidated properties in lease-up at September 30, 2010.
Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010 included approximately $198.4
million related to properties under development and land. Of this amount, approximately $30.3
million related to our projects currently under development. In addition, we had approximately
$168.1 million invested in land held for future development, which includes approximately $92.8
million related to projects we expect to begin constructing during the next 18 months, and
approximately $75.3 million invested in land tracts for which we may begin developing in the
future.
At September 30, 2010, we had investments in non-consolidated joint ventures which were
developing the following multifamily communities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% Leased |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
at |
|
Property and Location |
|
Ownership % |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
10/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Communities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Braeswood Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
Belle Meade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Completed Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Construction (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Ivy Hall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
110 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Under Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Development(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakes at 610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pre-Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Properties in lease-up as of September 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Properties in pre-development by joint venture partner. |
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments.
Results of Operations
Changes in revenues and expenses related to our operating properties from period to period are
due primarily to the performance of stabilized properties in the portfolio, the lease-up of newly
constructed properties, acquisitions, and dispositions. Where appropriate, comparisons of income
and expense on communities included in continuing operations are made on a dollars-per-weighted
average apartment home basis in order to adjust for such changes in the number of apartment homes
owned during each period. Selected weighted averages for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Average monthly property revenue per apartment home |
|
$ |
1,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
Annualized total property expenses per apartment home |
|
$ |
5,106 |
|
|
$ |
5,148 |
|
|
$ |
5,033 |
|
|
$ |
5,027 |
|
Weighted average number of consolidated operating
apartment homes |
|
|
50,327 |
|
|
|
49,781 |
|
|
|
50,127 |
|
|
|
49,589 |
|
Weighted average occupancy of consolidated operating
apartment homes |
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
94.1 |
% |
31
Property-level operating results
The following tables present the property-level revenues and expenses, excluding discontinued
operations, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same periods
in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes At |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
9/30/10 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
46,757 |
|
|
$ |
142,750 |
|
|
$ |
144,104 |
|
|
$ |
(1,354 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
423,030 |
|
|
$ |
436,168 |
|
|
$ |
(13,138 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
Non-same store
communities |
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
12,455 |
|
|
|
9,805 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
34,321 |
|
|
|
27,594 |
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
Development and
lease-up communities |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property
revenues |
|
|
51,135 |
|
|
$ |
156,276 |
|
|
$ |
155,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
460,777 |
|
|
$ |
467,519 |
|
|
$ |
(6,742 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
46,757 |
|
|
$ |
57,888 |
|
|
$ |
58,747 |
|
|
$ |
(859 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
171,352 |
|
|
$ |
172,242 |
|
|
$ |
(890 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
Non-same store
communities |
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
14,025 |
|
|
|
12,160 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Development and
lease-up communities |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property
expenses |
|
|
51,135 |
|
|
$ |
64,247 |
|
|
$ |
64,069 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
$ |
189,203 |
|
|
$ |
186,977 |
|
|
$ |
2,226 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities are communities we owned and were stabilized as of January 1, 2009. Non-same
store communities are stabilized communities we have acquired, developed or re-developed after
January 1, 2009. Development and lease-up communities are non-stabilized communities we have
developed or acquired after January 1, 2009.
Same store analysis
Same store property revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased
approximately $1.4 million, or 0.9%, from the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily
related to a decline in same store rental revenues of approximately $1.3 million due to a 1.2%
decline in average rental rates for our same store portfolio, partially offset by an increase in
average occupancy of approximately 0.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009.
Same store property revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased
approximately $13.1 million, or 3.0%, from the same period in 2009. Same store rental revenues
decreased approximately $13.5 million, despite average occupancy remaining at approximately 94.0%
for both the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, primarily due to a 3.4% decline in
average rental rates for our same store portfolio. The decrease was partially offset by an
approximate $0.4 million increase in other property revenue primarily due to increases in revenues
from our utility rebilling programs, offset by decreases in miscellaneous income.
Property expenses from our same store communities decreased approximately $0.9 million, or
1.5%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The
decrease in same store property expenses was primarily due to lower real estate taxes as a result
of declining rates and valuations at a number of our communities and declines in repairs and
maintenance and property insurance costs. These decreases were partially offset by increases in
expenses related to our utility rebilling programs and an increase in salary and benefits expense
due primarily to higher medical claims during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009. Excluding the expenses associated with our utility rebilling programs,
same store property expenses for this period decreased approximately $1.3 million, or 2.3%.
Property expenses from our same store communities decreased approximately $0.9 million, or
0.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The
decrease in same store property expenses was primarily due to lower real estate taxes as a result
of declining rates and valuations at a number of our communities. These decreases were partially
offset by increases in expenses related to our utility rebilling programs. Excluding the expenses
associated with our utility rebilling programs, same store property expenses for this period
decreased approximately $2.2 million, or 1.4%.
32
Non-same store analysis
Property revenues from non-same store communities increased approximately $2.7 million and
$6.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to
the same periods in 2009. Property expenses from non-same store communities increased
approximately $0.6 million and $1.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009. The increases during the period were
primarily due to seven consolidated properties in our re-development and
development pipelines reaching stabilization during 2009 and 2010, in addition to
approximately $0.7 million of revenues and approximately $0.3 million of expenses recognized in the
third quarter of 2010 related to our newly consolidated joint venture as more fully described in
Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures.
Other property analysis
Other property revenues of approximately $1.1 million and $3.4 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 relate primarily to retail lease income. Other property expenses
increased approximately $0.4 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009. The increases were primarily
related to increases in property taxes expensed on land holdings for eight projects for which we
decided in 2009 to postpone development. As a result, we ceased capitalization of expenses,
including property taxes.
Non-property income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,028 |
|
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
Income on deferred
compensation plans |
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
(4,884 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income |
|
$ |
9,514 |
|
|
$ |
10,594 |
|
|
$ |
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
16,834 |
|
|
$ |
20,209 |
|
|
$ |
(3,375 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and asset management income increased approximately $0.3 million and decreased
approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as
compared to the same periods in 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the increase
was primarily related to an increase in third-party construction activities during 2010. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, the increase in third-party construction activities during
2010 was offset by decreases in development and construction fees earned on our development joint
ventures as compared to 2009 due to the completion of construction activities during 2009 and 2010
and decreases in fees earned on our stabilized joint ventures due to declines in rental income.
Interest and other income decreased approximately $0.1 million and increased approximately
$1.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to
the same periods in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the $1.6 million increase
was primarily due to recognition of approximately $2.7 million of other income resulting from
indemnification provisions in an operating joint venture agreement which expired in January 2010,
partially offset by an approximate $0.8 million decrease in interest income primarily due to
declines in interest income on our mezzanine loan portfolio related to contractual reductions in
interest rates on mezzanine loans for development communities which have reached stabilization and
lower balances of outstanding mezzanine loans due in part to conversion of the mezzanine loans into
additional equity interests in certain of our joint ventures in 2009 and 2010.
Income on deferred compensation plans was approximately $6.9 million and $6.8 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to income of
approximately $8.2 million and $11.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. The decreases were related to the performance of the investments held in
deferred compensation plans for participants and were directly offset by the expense related to
these plans, as discussed below.
33
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property management |
|
$ |
4,789 |
|
|
$ |
4,377 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
14,994 |
|
|
$ |
13,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,568 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
22,339 |
|
|
|
23,010 |
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
31,781 |
|
|
|
31,117 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
95,078 |
|
|
|
97,364 |
|
|
|
(2,286 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
43,685 |
|
|
|
42,697 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
129,963 |
|
|
|
130,197 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Amortization of deferred
financing costs |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
73.8 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Expense on deferred
compensation plans |
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
(4,884 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
97,081 |
|
|
$ |
95,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
$ |
275,427 |
|
|
$ |
281,989 |
|
|
$ |
(6,562 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management expense, which represents regional supervision and accounting costs
related to property operations, increased approximately $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009.
The increases were primarily due to increases in salary and benefit expenses, higher rental
expense, and an increase in travel expenses as compared to the same periods in 2009. Property
management expenses were approximately 3.1% and 3.3% of total property revenues for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and approximately 2.8% and 3.0% for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
General and administrative expense decreased approximately $0.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due
to $1.0 million in severance payments made in connection with the reduction in force of our
construction and development staff in January 2009, and a decrease in legal costs and discretionary
expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and was partially offset by an increase
in salary and benefit expenses, including long-term incentive compensation, during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 2009. General and administrative expenses were
approximately 4.8% and 4.7% of total property revenues and non-property income, excluding income on
deferred compensation plans, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively,
and were approximately 4.8% of total property revenues and non-property income, excluding income on
deferred compensation plans, for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest expense increased approximately $0.7 million and decreased approximately $2.3 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2009. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily due to
using the net proceeds of $272.1 million from the equity offering completed during the second
quarter of 2009 and approximately $134.6 million in net proceeds from our ATM program during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 to retire outstanding debt, prior to its maturity, of
approximately $325.0 million during the first six months of 2009 and repay maturing secured and
unsecured notes during 2009 and 2010, as well as reduce the balances outstanding on our unsecured
line of credit during the second quarter of 2009. This decrease was partially offset by the
increased interest expense incurred on our $420 million credit facility entered into during the
second quarter of 2009 and lower capitalized interest of approximately $3.6 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 primarily due to the
completion of communities in our development pipeline and our decision in fiscal year 2009 to
postpone the development of land holdings for eight future projects.
The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in
2009 was primarily due to lower capitalized interest of approximately $1.4 million primarily due to
the completion of communities in our development pipeline and our decision in fiscal year 2009 to
postpone development of land holdings for eight future projects. The increase was also due to
approximately $0.3 million of interest expense relating to our joint venture which was consolidated
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as discussed in Note 5, Investments in Joint
Ventures, and approximately $0.2 million of interest expense relating to a consolidated joint
venture which completed construction during the three months ended March 31, 2010. These increases
were partially offset by lower interest expense due to lower debt levels due to retirement of
outstanding debt, prior to its maturity, and payment of outstanding balances on our unsecured line
of credit during 2009, in addition to repayments of maturing debt in 2009 and 2010.
34
Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $1.0 million and decreased approximately
$0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to
the same periods in 2009. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was due in part to the
consolidation of one of our joint ventures previously accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily due to an
increase in the number of assets being fully depreciated in 2010 as compared to 2009, and was
offset by new development and capital improvements placed in service during 2009 and 2010 and the
consolidation of the previously mentioned joint venture.
Amortization of deferred financing costs increased approximately $0.5 million and $0.3 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2009. These increases were primarily due to additional financing costs incurred on our
$500 million unsecured credit facility, entered into in August 2010, and on our $420 million credit
facility, entered into in the second quarter of 2009. These increases were partially offset by
lower amortization of deferred financing costs related to the repurchase and retirement of certain
series of notes during 2009.
Expense on deferred compensation plans totaled approximately $6.9 million and $6.8 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to expense of
approximately $8.2 million and $11.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. The decreases were related to the performance of the investments held in
deferred compensation plans for participants, and were directly offset by the income related to
these plans, as discussed above.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Gain on sale of properties,
including land |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Loss on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of
joint ventures |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not a meaningful percentage |
Loss on early retirement of debt was approximately $2.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily due to the repurchase and retirement of approximately $317.6 million
of various unsecured and secured notes from unrelated third parties for approximately $320.3
million during the three months ended June 30, 2009. This loss was partially offset by
the repurchase and retirement of approximately $7.4 million of unsecured notes from unrelated third
parties for approximately $7.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The loss on
early retirement of debt also includes applicable loan costs. There was no early retirement of
debt during the three months ended September 30, 2010 or 2009 or the nine months ended September
30, 2010.
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures decreased approximately $0.2 million and $1.4
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the
same periods in 2009. These decreases were primarily the result of declining earnings by our
stabilized operating joint ventures due to declines in rental income, and the recognition of net
operating losses by certain development joint ventures during the lease-up phase of operations,
which were offset by increases in earnings in other development joint ventures reaching or nearing
stabilization during 2009 and 2010.
We incurred entity-level taxes for our operating partnerships and other state and local taxes
totaling approximately $0.7 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and totaling approximately $1.3 million and $0.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increases during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009 were due to increases in
taxable income related to our third-party construction activities conducted in a taxable REIT
subsidiary.
35
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Income allocated to
noncontrolling
interests from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(432 |
) |
|
$ |
(505 |
) |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
(542 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,448 |
) |
|
$ |
(906 |
) |
|
|
(62.6 |
)% |
Income allocated to
perpetual preferred
units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations decreased
approximately $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the completion during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and lease-up during the three months ended September 30, 2010 of a property by a
fully-consolidated joint venture of which we retain a 25% ownership, which resulted in our
recording depreciation and interest expense on the property, upon completion of construction, in
excess of income recognized during the lease-up period. The decrease was partially offset by
higher earnings associated with properties held by our operating partnerships during 2010 as
compared to 2009.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
Management considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of the financial performance of an
equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) currently
defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses)
associated with the sale of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation
and amortization, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted
FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain
noncontrolling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an
appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on
dispositions of operating properties and depreciation, FFO can help one compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
To facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, we
believe FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to common shareholders
as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and data
included elsewhere in this report. FFO is not defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an
alternative to net income attributable to common shareholders as an indication of our operating
performance. Additionally, FFO as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our
calculation.
36
Reconciliations of net income attributable to common shareholders to diluted FFO for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Funds from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
28,486 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization,
including discontinued operations |
|
|
42,457 |
|
|
|
41,834 |
|
|
|
126,675 |
|
|
|
127,707 |
|
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
6,753 |
|
|
|
5,812 |
|
Gain on sale of properties, including land and
discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,887 |
) |
Income allocated to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
46,680 |
|
|
$ |
48,112 |
|
|
$ |
140,361 |
|
|
$ |
146,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
67,898 |
|
|
|
61,087 |
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and awards granted |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Common units |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
72,025 |
|
|
|
68,959 |
|
|
|
70,779 |
|
|
|
63,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve our financial flexibility, which we
believe should enhance our ability to identify and capitalize on investment opportunities as they
become available. We intend to maintain what management believes is a conservative capital
structure by:
|
|
|
extending and sequencing the maturity dates of our debt where practicable; |
|
|
|
managing interest rate exposure using what management believes to be prudent levels
of fixed and floating rate debt; |
|
|
|
maintaining what management believes to be conservative coverage ratios; and |
|
|
|
using what management believes to be a prudent combination of debt and common and
preferred equity. |
Our interest expense coverage ratio, net of capitalized interest, was approximately 2.6 and
2.5 times for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and approximately
2.6 times for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Our interest expense
coverage ratio is calculated by dividing interest expense for the period into the sum of property
revenues and expenses, non-property income, other expenses, and income from discontinued
operations, after adding back depreciation, amortization, and interest expense from both continuing
and discontinued operations. This ratio is a method for calculating the amount of operating cash
flows available to cover interest expense. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 71.6% and
73.1%, respectively, of our properties (based on invested capital) were unencumbered. Our weighted
average maturity of debt, including our line of credit, was approximately 5.7 years at September
30, 2010.
We intend to continue to focus on strengthening our capital and liquidity position by
generating positive cash flows from operations, reducing outstanding debt and leverage ratios, and
controlling overhead costs.
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Other sources include
available cash balances, the availability under our unsecured credit facility and other short-term
borrowings, proceeds from dispositions of properties and other investments, secured mortgage debt,
and the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement,
including under our ATM share offering program. We believe our liquidity and financial condition
are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash flow needs during 2010 and 2011
including:
|
|
|
normal recurring operating expenses; |
|
|
|
current debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
recurring capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
initial funding of property developments, acquisitions, joint venture investments,
and notes receivable; and |
|
|
|
the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. |
37
Factors which could increase or decrease our future liquidity include, but are not limited to,
volatility in capital and credit markets, sources of financing, our ability to complete asset
sales, the effect our debt level and decreases in credit ratings could have on our costs of funds
and our ability to access capital markets.
Cash Flows
Certain sources and uses of cash, such as the level of discretionary capital expenditures,
repurchases of debt and common shares, and distributions paid on our equity securities are within
our control and are adjusted as necessary based upon, among other factors, market conditions. The
following is a discussion of our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Net cash from operating activities was approximately $178.5 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to approximately $185.4 million for the same period in 2009.
The decrease was primarily due to declines in property revenues within our same store communities
partially offset by an increase in revenues from certain non-same store communities reaching
stabilization in 2009 and 2010. The decrease was offset by lower interest payments and the timing
of payments relating to accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled
approximately $50.1 million as compared to approximately $50.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Cash outflows for property development and capital improvements were
approximately $43.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
approximately $55.1 million for the same period in 2009 due to the timing of completions of
communities in our development pipeline and a reduction in construction and development activity in
2010 as compared to 2009. Additionally, cash outflows for investments in joint ventures were
approximately $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
approximately $22.8 million during the same period in 2009. The cash outflow for 2010 primarily
relates to two acquisitions made during the third quarter of 2010 by one of the Funds in which we
own a 20% interest. The cash outflow for 2009 was a result of our $22.2 million preferred equity
investment (with a preference on distribution of cash flows over previously contributed equity) in
one of our joint ventures located in Orange County, California during the third quarter 2009. The
cash outflows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were offset by proceeds received from
the sale of one operating property of approximately $28.1 million and from payments received on
notes receivable other for approximately $8.7 million.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately $101.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of the repayment of maturing outstanding unsecured
notes payable of approximately $140.1 million, repayment of approximately $52.1 million for an
unsecured note assumed in connection with obtaining a controlling interest in a joint venture, and
distributions paid to common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and noncontrolling
interest holders of approximately $101.1 million. The cash outflows were partially offset by cash
receipts of approximately $134.6 million relating to proceeds received from the sale of
approximately 2.9 million common shares under our ATM share offering program entered into in March
2010. Cash outflows were further offset by decreases in accounts receivable from affiliates of
approximately $3.8 million relating to proceeds received from participant withdrawals from our
deferred compensation plans and approximately $57.6 million for proceeds received from secured
notes payable relating primarily to a secured credit agreement for a newly consolidated joint
venture and advances under a construction loan for one of our communities under construction during
2010. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled approximately $60.7 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to proceeds from a $420 million
secured credit facility entered into during the second quarter of 2009. Additionally, we received
net proceeds of approximately $272.1 million from the completion of our equity offering in May
2009. These increases in cash flows from financing activities were offset by cash outflows of
approximately $647.9 million used for the repayment of notes payable and pay-off of all amounts
outstanding on our unsecured line of credit, and approximately $119.5 million used for
distributions paid to shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and noncontrolling interest
holders.
38
Financial Flexibility
In August 2010, we entered into a $500 million unsecured credit facility, with the ability to
further increase to $600 million, which matures in August 2012 and may be extended at our option to
August 2013. This facility
replaces our $600 million unsecured credit facility which was scheduled to mature in January
2011. Interest rate spreads float on a margin based on LIBOR and are subject to change as our
credit ratings change. Advances under the line of credit may be priced at the scheduled rates, or
we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the scheduled rates.
These bid rate loans have terms of 180 days or less and may not exceed the lesser of $250 million
or the remaining amount available under the line of credit. The line of credit is subject to
customary financial covenants and limitations, all of which we are in compliance.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At September 30, 2010, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.2 million, leaving approximately $489.8 million
available under our unsecured line of credit.
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110 million shares of
beneficial interest, consisting of 100 million common shares and 10 million preferred shares. As of
September 30, 2010, we had approximately 67.6 million common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and no preferred shares
outstanding.
In March 2010, we announced the creation of an at-the-market (ATM) share offering program
through which we may, but have no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering
price of up to $250 million, in amounts and at times as we determine, into the existing trading
market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Actual sales will
depend on a variety of factors we determine from time to time, including, among others, market
conditions, the trading price of our common shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of
funding for us.
The following table presents activity under our ATM share offering program for the periods
presented (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares sold |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Total net consideration |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
134.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per share |
|
$ |
48.05 |
|
|
$ |
46.91 |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2010, we issued approximately 1.0 million common shares at an
average price of $49.25 per share for total net consideration of approximately $50.4 million. As
of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $61.9
million remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
We believe our ability to access capital markets is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt
ratings by Moodys and Standard and Poors, which are currently Baa1 and BBB, respectively, with
stable outlooks, as well as by our ability to borrow on a secured basis from Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac, and other sources. However, we may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings and may
not be able to borrow on a secured or unsecured basis in the future due to the continued volatility
in the capital and credit markets.
Future Cash Requirements and Contractual Obligations
One of our principal long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt,
including borrowings under our unsecured line of credit used to fund development and acquisition
activities. We have no scheduled debt maturities for the remainder of 2010 and have approximately
$158.5 million of debt maturities in 2011. We intend to meet future long-term liquidity
requirements through available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our
unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions and secured mortgage notes, and the
use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, including under
our ATM share offering program.
39
During the third quarter of 2010 we began construction on two development projects. As of
September 30, 2010, we were obligated for approximately $62.7 million of additional expenditures on these
projects. We expect to fund these amounts through available cash balances and draws on our
unsecured line of credit. We expect to start one development project in the fourth quarter of
2010. Upon completion of construction, which is expected to occur during 2012, these three
projects will add approximately 700 apartment homes to our portfolio. We are also evaluating the
timing of additional development projects during fiscal year 2011 and beyond.
In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we are required to distribute annual
dividends equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the
dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. In September 2010, we announced our Board of
Trust Managers had declared a dividend distribution of $0.45 per share to common shareholders of
record as of September 30, 2010. The dividend was subsequently paid on October 18, 2010. We paid
equivalent amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units. This
distribution to common shareholders and holders of common operating partnership units equates to an
annualized dividend rate of $1.80 per share or equivalent unit.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. We are also committed to additional funding under mezzanine loans provided to
joint ventures. We have guaranteed no more than our proportionate interest, totaling approximately
$47.8 million, of four loans utilized for construction and development activities for our joint
ventures. Our commitment to fund additional amounts under the mezzanine loans was an aggregate of
approximately $6.0 million at September 30, 2010.
Inflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term generally ranging from six to fifteen
months. In an inflationary environment, we may realize increased rents at the commencement of new
leases or upon the renewal of existing leases. The short-term nature of our leases generally
minimizes our risk from the adverse affects of inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies have not changed materially from information reported in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities, which codified the previously issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R. ASU 2009-17 changes the consolidation
analysis for VIEs and requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of the
VIE. The determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether the entity has the
power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and has the
obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, of the VIE which could potentially
be significant to the VIE. The ASU requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary
and also amends the events triggering a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. ASU 2009-17
requires additional disclosures for VIEs, including disclosures about a reporting entitys
involvement with VIEs, how a reporting entitys involvement with a VIE affects the reporting
entitys financial statements, and significant judgments and assumptions made by the reporting
entity to determine whether it must consolidate the VIE. ASU 2009-17 was effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. Our adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material effect on our financial
statements, but could potentially have a material impact on future reconsideration events and
subsequent reassessment of VIE status.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
No material changes to our exposures to market risk have occurred since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
40
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act (Exchange Act) Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report are effective to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act
filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter which have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For discussion regarding legal proceedings, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated November 5, 2010. |
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated November 5, 2010. |
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST |
|
|
|
/s/ Michael P. Gallagher
|
|
November 5, 2010 |
|
|
|
Michael P. Gallagher
|
|
Date |
Vice President Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
42
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description of Exhibits |
31.1 |
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated November 5, 2010. |
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated November 5, 2010. |
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
43