e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended: June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the Transition Period From to .
Commission File Number: 001-33603
Dolan Media Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
43-2004527 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
706 Second Avenue South, Suite 1200,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(Address, including zip code of registrants principal executive offices)
(612) 317-9420
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On August 5, 2008, there were 29,129,052 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Dolan Media Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
Accounts receivable, including unbilled
services (net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $1,377 and $1,283 as of June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
25,150 |
|
|
|
20,689 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
30,238 |
|
|
|
24,943 |
|
Investments |
|
|
18,005 |
|
|
|
18,479 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
13,209 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
Finite-life intangible assets, net |
|
|
100,843 |
|
|
|
88,946 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
81,543 |
|
|
|
79,044 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
246,292 |
|
|
$ |
226,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
6,526 |
|
|
$ |
4,749 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,731 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
Due to sellers of acquired businesses |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
11,632 |
|
|
|
11,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
28,762 |
|
|
|
30,403 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
67,312 |
|
|
|
56,301 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
|
4,393 |
|
Deferred revenue and other liabilities |
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
104,396 |
|
|
|
94,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
(redemption value of $16,020 as of June 30,
2008) |
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par
value; authorized: 70,000,000
shares; outstanding: 25,131,282
and 25,088,718 shares as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
authorized: 5,000,000 shares; no shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
213,156 |
|
|
|
212,364 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(74,809 |
) |
|
|
(83,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
138,372 |
|
|
|
129,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
246,292 |
|
|
$ |
226,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
1
Dolan Media Company
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Information |
|
$ |
23,424 |
|
|
$ |
21,588 |
|
|
$ |
46,196 |
|
|
$ |
41,068 |
|
Professional Services |
|
|
18,129 |
|
|
|
15,467 |
|
|
|
36,869 |
|
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
41,553 |
|
|
|
37,055 |
|
|
|
83,065 |
|
|
|
72,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating: Business Information |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
15,724 |
|
|
|
13,879 |
|
Direct operating: Professional Services |
|
|
6,436 |
|
|
|
5,273 |
|
|
|
12,747 |
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
16,732 |
|
|
|
15,660 |
|
|
|
32,836 |
|
|
|
28,988 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
34,828 |
|
|
|
30,753 |
|
|
|
68,134 |
|
|
|
59,124 |
|
Equity in earnings of The Detroit Legal News
Publishing, LLC |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
17,957 |
|
|
|
15,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense related to
redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,260 |
) |
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
(2,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(27,716 |
) |
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
|
|
(59,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
(20,084 |
) |
|
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
(43,830 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
(5,786 |
) |
|
|
(4,107 |
) |
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
$ |
(21,858 |
) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,936,360 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
|
|
24,936,183 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,307,422 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
|
|
25,246,279 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
2
Dolan Media Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
(29,179 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,875 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,034 |
) |
|
|
(54,034 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense, including
issuance of restricted stock (shares are net
of forfeitures) |
|
|
171,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970 |
|
Preferred stock series C conversion |
|
|
5,093,155 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
73,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,849 |
|
Initial public offering proceeds, net of
underwriting discount and offering costs |
|
|
10,500,000 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
137,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,266 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
25,088,718 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
212,364 |
|
|
$ |
(83,213 |
) |
|
$ |
129,176 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense, including
issuance of restricted stock (shares are net
of forfeitures) |
|
|
42,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at June 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
25,131,282 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
213,156 |
|
|
$ |
(74,809 |
) |
|
$ |
138,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
3
Dolan Media Company
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
Distributions received from The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Minority interest distributions paid |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
Non-cash operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Equity in earnings of The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
|
(3,026 |
) |
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Change in value of interest rate swap and accretion of interest on
note payable |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
Non-cash interest related to redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,327 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Change in accounting estimate related to self-insured medical reserve |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
business acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,461 |
) |
|
|
(2,422 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(996 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
4,075 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,574 |
|
|
|
12,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(19,176 |
) |
|
|
(17,335 |
) |
Pending acquisitions |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(22,170 |
) |
|
|
(21,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (payments) borrowings on senior revolving note |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Proceeds from borrowings or conversions on senior term notes (Note 6) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Payments on senior long-term debt |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
(3,700 |
) |
Capital contribution from minority partner |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment on unsecured note payable |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments of offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(537 |
) |
Payments of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
2,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
4
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation: The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, which
has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements of Dolan Media Company, have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
the instructions to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
these rules and regulations. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys interim
financial results. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of
operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full calendar
year. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for comparability purposes within the
statement of operations with no impact on net income.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the following interests in American
Processing Company, LLC (APC): (1) an 81.0% interest from January 1, 2007, to January 8, 2007;
(2) a 77.4% interest from January 9, 2007, to November 30, 2007; (3) an 88.7% interest from
December 1, 2007, to February 21, 2008; and (4) an
88.9% interest from February 22, 2008, through
June 30, 2008. The Company accounts for the percentage interest in APC that it does not own as a
minority interest.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results may differ from these estimates. The Company believes the critical accounting policies that
require the most significant assumptions and judgments in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements include: purchase accounting; valuation of the Companys equity securities
prior to the Companys initial public offering; accounting for and analysis of potential impairment
of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets; accounting for share-based
compensation; income tax accounting; and allowances for doubtful accounts.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in
February 2008, FSP 157-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other
Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification
or Measurement under Statement 13 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13
and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2 Partial Deferral of the Effective
Date of Statement 157 (FSP 157-2), deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective
January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position
and results of operations. The
5
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date (exit price). SFAS No. 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following
hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
similar
assets or liabilities, or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for
the asset or liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability |
The Company endeavors to use the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial
assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Company has determined that its financial
liabilities are level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. As of June 30, 2008, the Companys only
financial liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis were its interest rate
swaps, included in deferred revenue and other liabilities at $1.2 million.
The Company is exposed to market risks related to interest rates. Other types of market risk,
such as foreign currency risk, do not arise in the normal course of its business activities. The
Companys exposure to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under its credit facility.
However, as of June 30, 2008, the Company had swap arrangements that convert $40.0 million of its
variable rate term loan into a fixed rate obligation. Under its bank credit facility, the Company
is required to enter into derivative financial instrument transactions, such as swaps or interest
rate caps, in order to manage or reduce its exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. The
Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instrument transactions for speculative
purposes. The interest rate swaps are valued using market interest rates. As such, these
derivative instruments are classified within level 2.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits an entity to choose, at specified election dates,
to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value. An entity must report unrealized gains and losses
on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. Upfront costs and fees related to items for which the fair value option is elected must be
recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 was effective
beginning January 1, 2008 for the Company. At the effective date, an entity may elect the fair
value option for eligible items that exist at that date. The entity must report the effect of the
first remeasurement to fair value as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings. The Company has not elected the fair value option for eligible items that
existed as of January 1, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which changes how
the Company will account for business acquisitions. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in
a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
the transaction and establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for
all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain provisions of this
standard will, among other things, impact the determination of acquisition-date fair value of
consideration paid in a business combination (including contingent consideration);
6
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
exclude transaction costs from acquisition accounting; and change accounting practices for
acquired contingencies, acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and
development, indemnification assets, and tax benefits. For the Company, SFAS No. 141R is effective
for business combinations and adjustments to an acquired entitys deferred tax asset and liability
balances occurring after December 31, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the future impacts
and disclosure requirements of this standard.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, which establishes new standards governing the
accounting for and reporting of noncontrolling interests (NCIs) in partially owned consolidated
subsidiaries and the loss of control of subsidiaries. Certain provisions of this standard indicate,
among other things, that NCIs (previously referred to as minority interests) be treated as a
separate component of equity, not as a liability; that increases and decrease in the parents
ownership interest that leave control intact be treated as equity transactions, rather than as step
acquisitions or dilution gains or losses; and that losses of a partially owned consolidated
subsidiary be allocated to the NCI even when such allocation might result in a deficit balance.
This standard also requires changes to certain presentation and disclosure requirements. For the
Company, SFAS No. 160 is effective beginning January 1, 2009. The provisions of the standard are to
be applied to all NCIs prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements,
which are to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently
evaluating the future impacts and disclosures requirements of this standard.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. The Statement requires companies to
provide enhanced disclosures regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires
companies to better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the company is
intending to manage. Disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments,
(b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a
companys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows are required. This Statement
retains the same scope as SFAS No. 133 and is effective beginning January 1, 2009 for the Company.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this Statement will
have on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful
Life of Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP
142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, and other U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). FSP 142-3 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this Statement will
have on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. This statement documents the hierarchy of the various sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing financial statements.
This statement shall be effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning
of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 162 will not
have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.
Note 2. Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic per share amounts are computed, generally, by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. At June 30, 2007, the Company had shares of
Series A and Series C preferred stock issued and outstanding. There were no shares of preferred
stock issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 because all issued and outstanding shares of Series C
preferred stock were converted into shares of Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock
and common stock in connection with the consummation of the Companys initial public offering on
August 7, 2007. Also, at that time, the Company redeemed all outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock issued upon conversion of the Series C
preferred stock.
7
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
See Note 7 for more information about the conversion of the Series C preferred stock and the
redemption of preferred stock in connection with the Companys initial public offering. The Company
believes that, prior to its conversion, the Series C preferred stock was a participating security
because the holders of the convertible preferred stock participated in any dividends paid on its
common stock on an as converted basis. Consequently, the two-class method of income allocation was
used in determining net income (loss), except during periods of net losses, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007. Under this method, net income (loss) is allocated on a pro rata basis
to the common and Series C preferred stock to the extent that each class may share in income for
the period had it been distributed. Diluted per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise, or
issuance of all potential common stock instruments (see Note 11 for information on stock options)
unless their effect is anti-dilutive.
The following table computes basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
$ |
(21,858 |
) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
25,116 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
25,101 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
Weighted average common shares of unvested restricted stock |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net income (loss)
per share |
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net income (loss)
per share |
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of dilutive net income
(loss) per share |
|
|
25,307 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
25,246 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, options to purchase approximately
236,000, 123,000, 126,000, and 126,000 weighted shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded
from the diluted computation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 3. Acquisitions
The Company accounts for acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting, in accordance
with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Management is responsible for determining the fair
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The fair values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represent managements estimate of fair values.
Management determines valuations through a combination of methods which include internal rate of
return calculations, discounted cash flow models, outside valuations and appraisals and market
conditions. The Company consummated the acquisitions described below during the six months ended
June 30, 2008. The results of the acquisitions are included in the accompanying interim condensed
consolidated statement of operations from the respective acquisition dates forward.
Legal and Business Publishers, Inc.: On February 13, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of
Legal and Business Publishers, Inc., which include The Mecklenburg Times, an 84-year old court and
commercial publication located in Charlotte, North Carolina, and electronic products, including
www.mecktimes.com and www.mecklenburgtimes.com. The Company paid $3.3 million in cash for the
assets, consisting of $2.8 million paid at the closing date, plus an additional $500,000 the
Company paid on May 13, 2008 in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement. In addition,
the Company incurred acquisition costs of approximately $80,000. Under the terms of its agreement
with Legal and Business Publishers, the Company may be obligated to pay up to an additional
$500,000 in the aggregate based upon the revenues it earns from the assets during the six-month and
twelve-month periods following the closing of this acquisition. The Company will account for these
cash payments, if made, as additional purchase price. These assets are a part of the Companys
Business Information segment.
8
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Of the $3.3 million of acquired intangibles, the Company has preliminarily allocated $0.6
million to newspaper trade names/mastheads, which is being amortized over 30 years, and $2.7
million to advertising customer lists, which is being amortized over 10 years. The Company has
engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to assist it in estimating the fair value of the
finite-lived intangible assets and this valuation is not yet complete.
Wilford & Geske: On February 22, 2008, APC, a majority owned subsidiary of the Company,
acquired the mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske, a Minnesota law
firm, for $13.5 million in cash. In addition, the Company incurred acquisition costs of
approximately $0.2 million. APC may be obligated to pay up to an additional $2.0 million in
purchase price depending upon the adjusted EBITDA for this business during the twelve months ending
March 31, 2009. In connection with the acquisition of the mortgage default processing services
business of Wilford & Geske, APC appointed the managing attorneys of Wilford & Geske as executive
vice presidents of APC. These assets are part of the Companys Professional Services segment.
In conjunction with this acquisition, APC entered into a services agreement with Wilford &
Geske that provides for the exclusive referral of files from the law firm to APC for processing for
an initial term of fifteen years, with such term to be automatically extended for up to two
successive ten year periods unless either party elects to terminate the term then-in-effect with
prior notice. Under the agreement, APC is paid a fixed fee for each foreclosure, bankruptcy,
eviction, and, to a lesser extent, litigation, reduced redemption and torrens action case file for
residential mortgages that are in default referred by Wilford & Geske for processing. The fixed fee
per file increases on annual basis to account for inflation as measured by the consumer price
index.
Of the $13.6 million of acquired intangibles, the Company has preliminarily allocated $11.7
million to a long-term service agreement, which is being amortized over 15 years, representing its
initial contractual term. The Company preliminarily allocated the remaining $1.9 million of the
purchase price to goodwill. The goodwill is tax deductible and was allocated to the Professional
Services segment of the Company. The Company has engaged an independent third-party valuation firm
to assist in estimating the fair value of the identified intangibles and this valuation is not yet
complete. The Company paid a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identified
intangible assets acquired in the acquisition (i.e., goodwill) because the acquired business is a
complement to APC and the Company anticipated cost savings and revenue synergies through combined
general and administrative and corporate functions.
Minnesota Political Press: On March 14, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of Minnesota
Political Press, Inc. and Quadriga Communications, LLC, which includes the publication, Politics in
Minnesota, for a purchase price of $285,000 plus acquisition costs of approximately $49,000. The
entire purchase price has preliminarily been allocated to a customer list, which is being amortized
over two years. These assets are part of the Companys Business Information segment.
Midwest Law Printing Co., Inc.: On June 30, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of Midwest
Law Printing Co., Inc., which provides printing and appellate services in Chicago, Illinois. The
Company paid $600,000 in cash for the assets at closing. Acquisition costs associated with this
purchase were immaterial. The Company is also obligated to pay the seller $75,000 on the first
anniversary of closing, which was held back to secure indemnification claims. The Company may be
obligated to pay the seller up to an additional $225,000 in three annual installments of up to
$75,000 each based upon the revenues it earns from the assets in each of the three years following
closing. The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to a customer list, which is being
amortized over seven years, and working capital in the amount of $25,000. These assets are part of
the Companys Professional Services segment.
The following table provides further unaudited information on the Companys preliminary
purchase price allocations for the aforementioned 2008 acquisitions. The purchase price allocation
of each acquisition is preliminary pending completion of the final valuation of intangible assets
associated with those transactions. These preliminary allocations of purchase price are as follows
(in thousands):
9
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MN |
|
|
Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Wilford & |
|
|
Political |
|
|
Printing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publishers |
|
|
Geske |
|
|
Press |
|
|
Co., Inc. |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
APC long-term service contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
Other finite-life intangible assets |
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
4,266 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration, including direct expenses |
|
$ |
3,332 |
|
|
$ |
13,685 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
18,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Information (unaudited): Actual results of operations of the companies acquired in
2008 and 2007 are included in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
from the dates of acquisition. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations of the Company, set forth below, gives effect to the following acquisitions: (1) the
assets of Midwest Law Printing Co., Inc. acquired in June 2008, (2) the mortgage default processing
services business of Wilford & Geske acquired in February 2008, (3) the assets of Legal & Business
Publishers, Inc. acquired in February 2008, (4) the purchase of minority interests in APC from
Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy in November 2007, (5) the assets of Venture Publications, Inc.
acquired in March 2007, and (6) the mortgage default processing services business of Feiwell &
Hannoy acquired in January 2007, using the purchase method as if the acquisitions occurred on
January 1, 2007. We did not include the acquisition of the assets of Minnesota Political Press,
Inc. and Quadriga Communications, LLC because their impact on the Companys financial statements
would be immaterial. These amounts are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of
operations for future years or actual results that would have been realized had the acquisitions
occurred as of the beginning of each such year. Amounts in this table are in thousands, except per
share data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
41,735 |
|
|
$ |
39,083 |
|
|
$ |
84,388 |
|
|
$ |
77,732 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
4,412 |
|
|
|
(21,439 |
) |
|
|
8,544 |
|
|
|
(48,700 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
(5.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
(5.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,307 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
25,246 |
|
|
|
9,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Investments
Investments consisted of the following at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
Equity |
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
17,105 |
|
|
$ |
17,579 |
|
GovDelivery, Inc. |
|
Cost |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,005 |
|
|
$ |
18,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC: The Company owns a 35% membership interest in The
Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC, or DLNP. The Company accounts for this investment using the
equity method. Under DLNPs membership operating agreement, the Company receives quarterly
distributions based on its ownership percentage.
The difference between the Companys carrying value and its 35% share of the members equity
of DLNP relates principally to an underlying customer list at DLNP that is being amortized over its
estimated economic life through 2015.
10
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
The following tables summarize certain key information relative to the Companys investment in
DLNP as of June 30, 2008 and December 31 2007, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Carrying value of investment |
|
$ |
17,105 |
|
|
$ |
17,579 |
|
Underlying finite-lived customer list, net of amortization |
|
|
11,183 |
|
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Equity in
earnings of DLNP, net of
amortization of
customer list |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
Distributions received |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
DLNP publishes one daily and nine weekly court and commercial newspapers located in
southeastern Michigan. Summarized financial information for DLNP for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
12,031 |
|
|
$ |
10,019 |
|
|
$ |
24,436 |
|
|
$ |
19,089 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
9,539 |
|
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,234 |
|
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
14,897 |
|
|
|
11,577 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
10,846 |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,823 |
|
|
$ |
10,800 |
|
|
$ |
8,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys 35% share of net income |
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
Less amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GovDelivery, Inc.: In addition to the Companys 15% ownership of GovDelivery, James P. Dolan,
the Companys Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President personally owns 50,000 shares of
GovDelivery, Inc. He also served as a member of GovDeliverys board of directors until his
resignation in March 2008. The Company accounts for its investment in GovDelivery using the cost
method of accounting.
Note 5. Goodwill and Finite-life Intangible Assets
Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of
the amounts assigned to acquired tangible and identified intangibles assets and assumed
liabilities. Identified intangible assets represent assets that lack physical substance but can be
distinguished from goodwill.
The following table represents the balances as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and
changes in goodwill by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
58,632 |
|
|
$ |
20,412 |
|
|
$ |
79,044 |
|
Venture Publications, Inc.* |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
American Processing Company (Wilford & Geske) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
59,232 |
|
|
$ |
22,311 |
|
|
$ |
81,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents additional cash payment paid to Venture Publications, Inc. in connection with the
acquired assets achieving certain revenue targets set forth in the asset purchase agreement. This
has been accounted for as additional purchase price. |
11
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Finite-Life Intangible Assets: Total amortization expense for finite-life intangible assets
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $2.3 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. Total amortization expense for finite-life intangible assets for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $4.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
Note 6. Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligation
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, long-term debt consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Senior secured debt (see below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior variable-rate term note, payable in
quarterly installments with a balloon payment
due August 8, 2014 |
|
$ |
72,188 |
|
|
$ |
48,750 |
|
Senior variable-rate revolving note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior secured debt |
|
|
72,188 |
|
|
|
57,750 |
|
Unsecured note payable |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,838 |
|
|
|
61,050 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
67,312 |
|
|
$ |
56,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt: At June 30, 2008, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries had a
credit agreement with U.S. Bank, NA and other syndicated lenders, referred to collectively as U.S.
Bank, for a $200.0 million senior secured credit facility comprised of a term loan facility in an
initial aggregate amount of $50.0 million due and payable in quarterly installments with a final
maturity date of August 8, 2014 and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$150.0 million with a final maturity date of August 8, 2012. At June 30, 2008, the credit facility
was governed by the terms and conditions of a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
August 8, 2007. In accordance with the terms of this credit agreement, if at any time the
outstanding principal balance of revolving loans under the revolving credit facility exceeds
$25.0 million, such revolving loans will convert to an amortizing term loan due and payable in
quarterly installments with a final maturity date of August 8, 2014. The Company and U.S. Bank
amended the terms of the credit agreement after June 30, 2008. See Note 13 for information about an
amendment to the credit facility occurring after June 30, 2008.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made no draws on its credit facility.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company drew $16.0 million, which funded the
acquisitions of the assets of Legal & Business Publishers, Inc. and the mortgage default processing
services business of Wilford & Geske and general working capital needs. In March 2008, the Company
converted $25.0 million of the revolving loans then-outstanding under the credit facility to term
loans. The term loans, including those issued as a result of this conversion, have a maturity date
of August 8, 2014. At June 30, 2008, the Company had net unused available capacity of approximately
$125.0 million on its revolving credit facility, after taking into account the senior leverage
ratio requirements under the credit facility. At June 30, 2008, the weighted-average interest rate
on the senior term note was 6.0%.
Unsecured Note Payable: On January 9, 2008, APC made a $1.75 million payment to Feiwell &
Hannoy on a $3.5 million non-interest bearing promissory note APC issued in connection with the
acquisition of the mortgage default processing services business of Feiwell & Hannoy in January
2007. The second installment of $1.75 million is due January 9, 2009.
Note 7. Common and Preferred Stock
At June 30, 2008, the Company had 70,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock authorized and 25,131,282 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock
outstanding. All authorized shares of preferred stock are undesignated. Please refer to Note 13
for changes in our outstanding shares occurring after June 30, 2008.
In connection with the Companys initial public offering on August 7, 2007, the Company
effected a 9 for 1 stock split of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock through a
dividend of 8 shares of common stock for
12
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
each share of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the initial
public offering. At the time of the initial public offering, the Companys preferred stock was
divided into Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock. In connection with the initial public
offering, the Company converted all outstanding shares of Series C preferred stock into shares of
Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and common stock. The Company then used
$101.1 million of the net proceeds of the initial public offering to redeem all of the outstanding
shares of Series A preferred stock (including all accrued and unpaid dividends and shares issued
upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock) and Series B preferred stock (including shares
issued upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock). As a result of the redemption, there are
no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the Company did not record any non-cash interest expense related to its preferred
stock for the three or six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 8. Income Taxes
The provision of income taxes is based upon estimated annual effective tax rates in the tax
jurisdictions in which the Company operates. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company used an effective tax rate of 41% and 38%, respectively, based on its annual projected
income in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting
(APB No. 28) Pursuant to the principles of APB No. 28 and FASB Interpretation No. 18 (as
amended) Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods, an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 28,
the Company treated the dividend accretion deduction reflected in its ordinary income in the six
months ended June 30, 2007, as an unusual item in computing its annual effective tax rate. This
deduction was associated with the Companys non-cash interest expense related to its Series C
preferred stock, shares of which were outstanding until August 7, 2007. See Note 7 for more
information about the conversion and redemption of the Series C preferred stock in connection with
the Companys initial public offering.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. As
a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no adjustment in the liability for
unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had $197,000
of gross unrecognized tax benefits, or $153,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest
and net of federal benefit. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the
Companys effective tax rate, if recognized, was $171,000 as of December 31, 2007. There were no
significant adjustments for the unrecognized income tax benefits for the six months ended June 30,
2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an audit of the
Companys federal tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2005. At this time, the IRS is still
auditing the Companys tax returns and has not issued any adjustments. The Company does not believe
any adjustments, if issued, would have a material impact on its financial position.
Note 9. Major Customers and Related Parties
As of June 30, 2008, APC, the Companys majority owned subsidiary, had three customers,
Trott & Trott, Feiwell & Hannoy, and Wilford & Geske. APC has fifteen-year service contracts with
each of these customers, expiring in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively, which renew automatically
for up to two successive ten year periods unless either party elects to terminate the term
then-in-effect, upon prior written notice. These three customers pay APC monthly for its services.
See Note 13 for information about changes in APCs customers,
which may occur after June 30, 2008.
David A. Trott, president of APC, is also the managing attorney of Trott & Trott and owns a
majority of Trott & Trott. Trott & Trott is a related party. Trott & Trott owned a 9.1% interest
in APC until February 2008, when it assigned its interest in APC to APC Investments, LLC, a limited
liability company owned by the shareholders of Trott & Trott, including Mr. Trott and APCs two
executive vice presidents in Michigan. Together, these three individuals own 98% of APC
Investments. APC also pays Net Director, LLC and American Servicing Corporation for services
provided to APC. Mr. Trott has an 11.1% and 50% ownership interest in Net Director and American
Servicing Corporation, respectively. In the first quarter of 2008, APC and Trott & Trott agreed to
increase the fixed fee per file APC receives for each mortgage foreclosure, bankruptcy, eviction,
litigation and other mortgage default file Trott & Trott refers to APC for processing under APCs
service agreement with Trott & Trott. APC also agreed
13
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
to extend the payment terms from 30 to 45 days. Mr. Trott and his family members own 80.0% of
Legal Press, LLC, which owns 10.0% of the outstanding membership interests of DLNP, in which the
Company owns a 35.0% interest. In addition, Mr. Trott serves as a consultant to DLNP under a
consulting agreement and Trott & Trott has an agreement with DLNP to publish its foreclosure
notices in DLNPs publications.
At January 1, 2008, Feiwell & Hannoy owned a 2.3% interest in APC. Its interest in APC was
diluted to 2.0% in connection with the acquisition of the mortgage default processing services
business of Wilford & Geske. See Note 3 for more information about the Companys acquisition of the
mortgage default processing business of Wilford & Geske. In connection with this acquisition, APC
made a capital call in which Feiwell & Hannoy declined to participate. The Company contributed
Feiwell & Hannoys portion of the capital call to APC. Michael J. Feiwell and Douglas J. Hannoy,
senior executives of APC in Indiana, are shareholders and principal
attorneys of Feiwell & Hannoy.
APC
Investments and Feiwell & Hannoys interests in APC are expected to be diluted
after June 30, 2008 as a result of the acquisition of NDEx described in Note 13.
Note 10. Reportable Segments
The Companys two reportable segments consist of its Business Information Division and its
Professional Services Division. The Company determined its reportable segments based on the types
of products sold and services performed. The Business Information Division provides business
information products through a variety of media, including court and commercial newspapers, weekly
business journals and the Internet. The Business Information Division generates revenues from
display and classified advertising, public notices, circulation (primarily consisting of
subscriptions) and sales from commercial printing and database information. At June 30, 2008, the
Professional Services Division comprised two operating units providing support to the legal market.
These are Counsel Press, LLC, which provides appellate services, and American Processing Company
(APC), which provides mortgage default processing services. Both of these operating units generate
revenues through fee-based arrangements. In addition, the Company reports and allocates certain
administrative activities as part of corporate-level expenses.
The tables below reflect summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable
segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
23,424 |
|
|
$ |
18,129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,553 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
6,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,588 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
16,732 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
Equity in Earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,308 |
|
|
$ |
5,025 |
|
|
$ |
(2,139 |
) |
|
$ |
8,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
21,588 |
|
|
$ |
15,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,055 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
5,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,333 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
15,660 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
Equity in Earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,326 |
|
|
$ |
(2,743 |
) |
|
$ |
7,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
46,196 |
|
|
$ |
36,869 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,065 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
15,724 |
|
|
|
12,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,471 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19,825 |
|
|
|
9,242 |
|
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
32,836 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
6,827 |
|
Equity in Earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,285 |
|
|
$ |
10,815 |
|
|
$ |
(4,143 |
) |
|
$ |
17,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
41,068 |
|
|
$ |
31,682 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
72,750 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
13,879 |
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,777 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
16,752 |
|
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
28,988 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
5,359 |
|
Equity in Earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,542 |
|
|
$ |
9,409 |
|
|
$ |
(4,080 |
) |
|
$ |
15,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Share-Based Compensation
The Company applies SFAS 123(R) Share-Based Payment, which requires compensation cost
relating to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements based on
the estimated fair value of the equity or liability instrument issued. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes option pricing model in deriving the fair value estimates of share-based awards. All
inputs into the Black-Scholes model are estimates made at the time of grant. The Company used the
SAB 107 Share-Based Payment simplified method to determine the expected life of options it had
granted. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the
expected life of the options at the time of grant. The Company also made assumptions with respect
to expected stock price volatility based on the average historical volatility of a select peer
group of similar companies. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock is based
on the grant date price and is amortized over the vesting period. Forfeitures of share-based awards
are estimated at time of grant and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from
initial estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on the percentage of awards expected to vest,
taking into consideration the seniority level of the award recipients. The Company has assumed a
ten percent forfeiture rate on all restricted stock awards issued to non-management employees, and
a zero percent forfeiture rate on all stock option and restricted stock awards issued to management
employees and directors. Total share-based compensation expense for the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, was approximately $393,000 and $11,000, respectively, before income taxes. Total
share-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, was approximately
$792,000 and $21,000, respectively, before income taxes.
The Company has reserved 2,700,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under its incentive
compensation plan, of which there were 1,125,666 shares available for issuance under the plan as of
June 30, 2008.
Stock Options: Share-based compensation expense related to grants of options under
SFAS 123(R) for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, was approximately $287,000 and
$11,000, respectively, before income taxes and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, was
approximately $553,000 and $21,000, respectively, before income taxes.
The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of stock
options granted in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Expected term of options |
|
4.75 years |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
15
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
The following table represents stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average Grant |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Shares |
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Contractual Life |
Outstanding options at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
992,667 |
|
|
$ |
4.34 |
|
|
$ |
13.03 |
|
|
6.87 Yrs. |
Granted |
|
|
419,056 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
16.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(51,516 |
) |
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
14.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,360,207 |
|
|
$ |
4.49 |
|
|
$ |
14.04 |
|
|
6.54 Yrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
8.29 Yrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was approximately
$5.7 million, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was approximately
$1.0 million. At June 30, 2008, there was approximately $5.0 million of unrecognized compensation
cost related to outstanding options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 3.4 years.
Restricted Stock Grants: A summary of our nonvested restricted stock activity for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Nonvested, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
152,789 |
|
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
Granted |
|
|
54,139 |
|
|
|
16.52 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
15.05 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(11,575 |
) |
|
|
15.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
194,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense related to grants of restricted stock for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $106,000 and $239,000, respectively, before income
taxes. There was no comparable expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 because the
Company had no outstanding restricted stock during those periods. Total unrecognized compensation
expense for unvested restricted shares of common stock as of June 30, 2008 was approximately
$2.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.4 years.
Note 12. Contingencies and Commitments
From time to time, the Company is subject to certain claims and lawsuits that have arisen in
the ordinary course of its business. Although the outcome of such existing matters cannot presently
be determined, it is managements opinion that the ultimate resolution of such existing matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or financial
position.
Note 13. Subsequent Events
Equity Purchase Agreement-NDEx Acquisition: On July 28, 2008, the Company and APC signed an
equity purchase agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity interests in National Default
Exchange Management, Inc., National Default Exchange Holdings, L.P., THP/NDEx AIV, Corp., and
THP/NDEx AIV, LP (all of such entities referred to collectively as NDEx). NDEx provides mortgage
default processing services, primarily for the law firm, Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel,
LLP, in Texas. NDEx also provides these services in California and Georgia and operates a real
estate title company.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company will pay to the sellers of the equity
interest in NDEx $167.5 million in cash, with $151.0 million payable at closing, $15.0 million
placed into escrow to secure payment
16
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
of indemnification claims, and $1.5 million held back for working capital adjustments. In
addition, the Company may be obligated to pay up to an additional $13.0 million based upon the
adjusted EBITDA for NDEx during the first twelve months following the closing of the acquisition.
If the adjusted EBITDA for NDEx equals or exceeds $28.0 million during such twelve-month period,
the Company will pay the sellers the maximum $13.0 million earnout payment.
At closing, APC will also issue to the sellers, or their designees, an aggregate 6.1% interest
in APC (the APC Interests). At July 28, 2008, the APC Interests had an agreed upon fair market
value of approximately $11.6 million. The APC Interests, when issued, will include put rights and
other terms consistent with the existing minority interests in APC owned by APC Investments, LLC
(an affiliate of Trott & Trott P.C.) and Feiwell & Hannoy Professional Corporation. Please refer to
Minority Interest in Net Income of Subsidiary for more information about this existing right of
the minority members. As a result of this acquisition, the Company expects its interest in APC will
be diluted from 88.9% to 84.7% of the total outstanding interests in APC.
In addition, the Company will also issue to the sellers, or their designees, 825,528
unregistered shares of its common stock, having a fair market value of $15.9 million based upon
the daily last reported closing price for a share of the Companys common stock on the 20
consecutive trading days immediately preceding the signing of the equity purchase agreement
through, and including, July 25, 2008.
Upon the closing of the acquisition, the Company expects to allocate substantially all of the
acquired intangibles to the long term services agreements described below.
The closing of this acquisition is conditioned upon (a) NDEx entering into a long-term
services agreement with Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP and, if applicable,
affiliated law firms for the exclusive referral of mortgage default, foreclosure, litigation,
bankruptcy and other mortgage default related files for processing, (b) termination of the waiting
period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, (c) the shares of common stock issued in the acquisition
being listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and (d) satisfaction or waiver of other customary
closing conditions. Upon completion of the acquisition, which the Company expects will occur
during the third quarter of 2008, NDEx will become a subsidiary of APC and Michael Barrett will
serve as president and chairman emeritus of NDEx.
The Company expects to use all of the net proceeds from the sale of the shares in the private
placement (as described below), along with approximately $105.0 million in debt from its credit
facility and other available cash for the remaining balance, to finance the cash purchase price for
NDEx.
Securities Purchase Agreement-Private Placement: Also, on July 28, 2008, the Company signed a
securities purchase agreement with 24 accredited investors consisting of funds and investment
accounts managed or advised by TCS Capital Management, LLC, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., GLG
Partners, L.P., Polar Securities, Inc., William Blair & Company, LLC or Shannon River Partners to
sell an aggregate of 4,000,000 unregistered shares of the Companys common stock for $16.00 per
share. This sale closed on July 30, 2008.
In connection with this securities purchase agreement, the Company is obligated to file a
registration statement covering the re-sale of the privately placed shares and to use its
reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to be effective within 120 days of the
closing. If the registration statement is not declared effective within 120 days of the closing and
in certain other limited cases, the Company has agreed to pay the investors a cash penalty equal to
0.25% of each investors original purchase price for the shares still held by such investor each
week until the registration statement is effective or such investors shares can be sold without
registration or volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This cash penalty is
capped at 8.0% of each investors original purchase price for the shares still held by such
investor.
The Company received net proceeds of approximately $60.5 million from this private placement,
all of which it intends to apply to the purchase of NDEx (described above).
Allen & Co, LLP and Craig Hallum Capital Group, LLC served as exclusive placement agents for
this private placement. The Company has paid these placement agents $3.2 million, 5.0% of the total
offering price of $64.0
17
Dolan Media Company
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
million. In addition, the Company has reimbursed Allen & Co., LLP and Craig Hallum Capital
Group, LLC $84,614 and $22,508, respectively, for their expenses.
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement: Also, on July 28, 2008, the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries signed a First Amendment to the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement with the syndicate of lenders who are party to that agreement. In
addition to approving the acquisition of NDEx and waiving the requirement that the Company use 50%
of the proceeds from the private placement to pay down indebtedness under the credit facility (both
described above), the amendment (1) reduces the senior leverage ratio the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries are required to maintain as of the last day of each fiscal quarter from
no more than 4.50 to 1.00 to no more than 3.50 to 1.00 and (2) increases the interest rate margins
charged on the loans under the credit facility. While the amendment is effective as of July 28,
2008, if certain conditions subsequent are not satisfied by September 30, 2008, including, without
limitation, the closing of the NDEx acquisition and other customary conditions, the amendments
described above will cease to have any force or effect and the credit facility will revert back to
the existing provisions (except that the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries will not in any
event be required to use 50% of the proceeds from the private placement to pay down indebtedness
under the credit facility). The Company paid approximately $296,000 in fees in connection with this
amendment.
Shares outstanding: After completion of the transactions described in this Note 13, without
accounting for any forfeitures of restricted stock occurring after June 30, 2008 and assuming no
other issuances of shares, the Company expects to have approximately 29,956,810 shares outstanding.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We recommend that you read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and the related notes included in
this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933.
Forward looking statements are statements such as those contained in projections, plans,
objectives, estimates, and anticipated future economic performance, as well as assumptions relating
to any of the foregoing. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations
and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. We have tried
to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as may, will, expect,
anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, goal, continue, and similar expressions or
terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us
and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could
cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other
factors include:
|
|
|
our business operates in highly competitive markets and depends upon the economies and
the demographics of the legal, financial and real estate sectors in the markets we serve
and changes in those sectors could have an adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows and
profitability; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in paid subscriptions to our print publications could adversely affect our
circulation revenues to the extent we are not able to sufficiently increase our print
subscription rates and adversely affect our advertising and display revenues to the extent
advertisers begin placing fewer print advertisements with us due to print decreased
readership; |
|
|
|
|
we have owned and operated the businesses in our Professional Services Division (APC and
Counsel Press) for a short period of time; |
|
|
|
|
APCs business revenues are very concentrated, as APC currently provides mortgage
default processing services to only three customers, Trott & Trott, Feiwell & Hannoy and
Wilford & Geske, and if the number of case files referred to APC by these law firm
customers decreases or fails to increase, our operating results and ability to execute our
growth strategy could be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
|
the key attorneys at each of APCs three law firm customers are employed by APC and
APCs president, two of its four executive vice presidents and its two senior executives in
Indiana hold an indirect equity interest in APC. As a result, these key attorneys may, in
certain circumstances, have interests that differ from or conflict with our interests; |
|
|
|
|
regulation of sub-prime, Alt-A and other residential mortgage products, including bills
introduced in states where APC does business and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of
2008, and voluntary foreclosure relief programs developed by the Hope Now Alliance, a
consortium that includes loan servicers, may have an adverse effect on or restrict our
operations; |
|
|
|
|
a key component of our operating income and operating cash flows has been, and may
continue to be, our minority equity investment in The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
we are dependent on our senior management team, especially James P. Dolan, our founder,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Scott J. Pollei, our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer; Mark W.C. Stodder, our Executive Vice President
Business Information; and David A. Trott, President, APC; |
|
|
|
|
we intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which we may not complete or
integrate successfully into our business and which may subject us to considerable business
and financial risks; |
19
|
|
|
growing our business may place a strain on our management and internal systems,
processes and controls; |
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to close the acquisition of NDEx on a timely basis or at all; |
|
|
|
|
we will be required to incur additional indebtedness to close the acquisition of NDEx
and this additional debt will consume a significant portion of our ability to borrow and
may limit our ability to pursue other acquisitions or growth strategies; |
|
|
|
|
as we expect to do for the acquisition of NDEx, we may be required to incur additional
indebtedness or raise additional capital to fund acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of NDEx may expose us to particular business and financial risks that
include, but are not limited to: (1) diverting managements time, attention and resources
from managing the business; (2) incurring significant additional capital expenditures and
operating expenses to improve, coordinate or integrate managerial, operational, financial
and administrative systems; (3) failing to integrate the operations, personnel and internal
controls of NDEx into APC or to manage NDEx or our growth; and (4) facing operational
difficulties in new markets or with new product and service offerings. |
See Risk Factors in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008 with the
Securities Exchange Commission and Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2008 with the SEC and in Part II, Item 1A of this report for a
description of these and other risks, uncertainties and factors that could cause our actual
results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied by, these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise
required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed
circumstances or any other reason after the date of this report.
Overview
We are a leading provider of necessary business information and professional services to
legal, financial and real estate sectors in the United States. We serve our customers through two
complementary operating segments: our Business Information Division and our Professional Services
Division. Our Business Information Division currently publishes 65 print publications consisting of
14 paid daily publications, 30 paid non-daily publications and 21 non-paid non-daily publications.
In addition, we provide business information electronically through our 48 on-line publication web
sites, our 28 event and other non-publication web sites and our email notification systems. Our
Professional Services Division comprises two operating units, APC, which currently provides
mortgage default processing services to three law firms, one in Michigan, one in Indiana and one in
Minnesota, and Counsel Press, which provides appellate services to law firms and attorneys
nationwide. Upon the closing of the acquisition of NDEx described below in Recent Developments,
APC will provide mortgage default processing services to six law firm customers, as well as
directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers in California, and operate in three new states,
California, Georgia and Texas.
Recent Developments
Pending Acquisition of Outstanding Equity Interests of NDEx.
On July 28, 2008, we signed an equity purchase agreement to acquire all of the outstanding
equity interests, or equity interests, in National Default Exchange Management, Inc., National
Default Exchange Holdings, L.P., THP/NDEx AIV, Corp., and THP/NDEx AIV, LP (all of such entities
referred to collectively as NDEx). Under the terms of the purchase agreement, we will pay to the
sellers of NDEx $167.5 million in cash, with $151.0 million payable at closing, $15.0 million
placed into escrow to secure payment of indemnification claims, and $1.5 million held back for
working capital adjustments. In addition, we may be obligated to pay up to an additional $13.0
million in the future based upon the adjusted EBITDA for NDEx during the first twelve months
following the closing of the
20
acquisition. If the adjusted EBITDA for NDEx equals or exceeds $28.0 million during such
twelve-month period, we will pay the sellers the maximum $13.0 million earnout payment.
At closing, APC will also issue to the sellers, or their designees, an aggregate 6.1% interest
in APC (the APC Interests). As of July 28, 2008, the APC Interests had an agreed upon fair market
value of approximately $11.6 million. The APC Interests, when issued, will include put rights and
other terms consistent with the existing minority interests in APC owned by APC Investments, LLC
(an affiliate of Trott & Trott P.C.) and Feiwell & Hannoy. Please refer to Minority Interest in
Net Income of Subsidiary for more information about the rights of APC Investments and Feiwell &
Hannoy. As a result of this acquisition, we expect our interest in APC will be diluted from 88.9%
to 84.7% of the total outstanding membership interests in APC and that APC Investments and Feiwell
& Hannoy will hold 7.6% and 1.7%, respectively, of the outstanding membership interests in APC.
In addition, we will also issue to the sellers, or their designees, 825,528 unregistered
shares of our common stock, having a fair market value of $15.9 million based upon the daily last
reported closing price for a share of our common stock on the 20 consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the signing of the equity purchase agreement through, and including, July 25,
2008.
Upon the closing of the acquisition, we expect to allocate substantially all of the acquired
intangibles to the long term services agreements described below.
The closing of this acquisition is conditioned upon (a) NDEx entering into a long-term
services agreement with the Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner &
Engel, LLP (the Barrett Law Firm) and, if applicable,
affiliated law firms. for the exclusive referral of mortgage default, foreclosure, litigation,
bankruptcy and other mortgage default related files for processing, (b) termination of the waiting
period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, (c) the shares of common stock issued in the acquisition
being listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and (d) satisfaction or waiver of other customary
closing conditions. We made our Hart-Scott-Rodino filings shortly after the signing of the equity
purchase agreement.
We expect to use all of the net proceeds from the sale of the shares in the private placement
(as described below), along with approximately $105.0 million in debt from our
credit facility and other available cash for the remaining balance, to finance the cash purchase price for NDEx. After the acquisition
of NDEx, we expect to have approximately $20.0 million available on our credit facility.
Much like APC, NDEx provides mortgage default processing services, primarily for the Barrett
Law Firm in Texas. Last year, NDEx began providing these services in California directly for
mortgage lenders and loan servicers (instead of for a law firm that has such lenders and servicers
as clients). Unlike other states, foreclosure and certain other mortgage default processes may be
undertaken by non-attorneys in California. NDEx recently started providing mortgage default
processing services to the Barrett Law Firm and/or its affiliates for foreclosures and other
related files in Georgia.
In addition to providing mortgage default processing services, NDEx also operates a real
estate title company, which we will be acquiring as part of this pending acquisition. This is a new
line of business for us and one in which, among our key employees or executive officers, only Dave
Trott, president of APC, has any previous experience.
After closing of this acquisition, NDEx will become a subsidiary of APC. Michael C. Barrett,
the current chief executive officer of NDEx, will serve as president and chairman emeritus of NDEx.
We expect that two other key executives will remain in similar roles with NDEx. All
other NDEx senior executives are expected to remain with the business, although some of them may
provide services to the business on a limited basis. In addition, we will add approximately 520 new
employees with this acquisition. Like APC, NDEx has its own proprietary case management system. We
intend to have NDEx continue to use that system to process mortgage default files after completion
of the acquisition and eventually combine this system with the case management system currently
used by APC.
21
Private Placement
Also, on July 28, 2008, we signed a securities purchase agreement with 24 accredited investors
consisting of funds and investment accounts managed or advised by TCS Capital Management, LLC, T.
Rowe Price Associates, Inc., GLG Partners, L.P. Polar Securities, Inc., William Blair & Company,
LLC or Shannon River Partners to sell an aggregate of 4,000,000 unregistered shares of the
Companys common stock for $16.00 per share. This sale closed on July 30, 2008.
In connection with this securities purchase agreement, we are obligated to file a registration
statement covering the re-sale of the privately placed shares and to use our reasonable best
efforts to cause the registration statement to be effective within 120 days of the closing. If the
registration statement is not declared effective within 120 days of the closing and in certain
other limited cases, we have agreed to pay the investors a cash penalty equal to 0.25% of each
investors original purchase price for the shares still held by such investor each week until the
registration statement is effective or such investors shares can be sold without registration and
volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This cash penalty is capped at 8.0% of
each investors original purchase price for the shares still held by such investor.
We received net proceeds of approximately $60.5 million from this private placement. We plan
to apply all of these net proceeds toward the cash purchase price of NDEx (described above).
Allen & Co, LLP and Craig Hallum Capital Group, LLC served as exclusive placement agents for
this private placement. We have paid our placement agents $3.2 million, 5.0% of the total offering
price of $64.0 million. In addition, we have reimbursed Allen & Co., LLP and Craig Hallum Capital
Group, LLC $84,614 and $22,508, respectively, for their reasonable expenses.
Amendment to Credit Facility
In connection with the transactions described above, we amended our credit facility with the
syndicate of lenders who are party to our second amended restated credit facility. Specifically, on
July 28, 2008, we and our consolidated subsidiaries signed a first amendment to the credit
facility. In addition to approving the acquisition of NDEx and waiving the requirement that we use
50% of the proceeds from the private placement to pay down indebtedness under the credit facility
(both described above), the amendment (1) reduces the senior leverage ratio we and our consolidated
subsidiaries are required to maintain as of the last day of each fiscal quarter from no more than
4.50 to 1.00 to no more than 3.50 to 1.00 and (2) increases the interest rate margins charged on
the loans under the credit facility. While the amendment is effective as of July 28, 2008, if
certain conditions subsequent are not satisfied by September 30, 2008, including, without
limitation, the closing of the NDEx acquisition and customary conditions, the amendments described
above will cease to have any force or effect and the credit facility will revert back to the
existing provisions (except that we and our consolidated subsidiaries will not in any event be
required to use 50% of the proceeds from the private placement to pay down indebtedness under the
credit facility). We paid approximately $296,000 in fees in connection with this amendment.
Outstanding Shares after Private Placement and NDEx
After completion of the transactions described above, without accounting for any forfeitures
of restricted stock occurring after June 30, 2008 and assuming no other issuances of shares, we
expect to have approximately 29,956,810 shares outstanding.
Changes in our Ownership in APC
On November 30, 2007, we increased our majority ownership interest in APC to 88.7% by
acquiring 9.1% and 2.3% of the outstanding membership units in APC from the minority members,
Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy, respectively. We paid a total of $15.6 million for these units,
of which we paid $12.5 million to Trott & Trott and $3.1 million to Feiwell & Hannoy. After the
acquisition of these membership interests, our minority partners, Trott & Trott and Feiwell &
Hannoy, owned 9.1% and 2.3%, respectively, of APC. At the same time, the members of APC amended and
restated APCs operating agreement as it related to the right of Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy
to demand that we acquire their minority interest in APC. Please refer to Minority Interest in
22
Net Income of Subsidiary for more information about this right of the minority members. In
connection with the acquisition of mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske
in February 2008, APC made a capital call. Feiwell & Hannoy declined to participate in the capital
call. We contributed Feiwell & Hannoys share of the capital call and, as a result, our interest in
APC increased to 88.9% and Feiwell & Hannoys decreased to 2.0% of the outstanding membership
interests of APC. Also, in February 2008, Trott & Trott assigned its interest in APC to APC
Investments, LLC, a limited liability company owned by the shareholders of Trott & Trott, including
APC President, David A. Trott. After the consummation of the closing of the acquisition of NDEx (as
described above), we expect our ownership interest in APC to decrease to 84.7% as a result of the
issuance of APC membership interests to the sellers of NDEx. In addition, we expect that APC
Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy will hold 7.6% and 1.7%, respectively, of the outstanding
membership interests in APC after the closing of NDEx. The sellers of NDEx will own 6.1% of the
outstanding membership interests in APC.
Initial Public Offering
On August 7, 2007, we completed our initial public offering of 10,500,000 shares of common
stock (exclusive of 2,956,522 shares sold by selling stockholders and 2,018,478 shares sold
pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares from
certain selling stockholders) at a price of $14.50 per share. We received $137.4 million of net
proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriters discount of $10.7 million and
offering expenses of approximately $4.3 million. In connection with our initial public offering,
all outstanding shares of our Series C preferred stock, including all accrued and unpaid dividends,
converted into shares of Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and an aggregate of
5,093,155 shares of common stock. We used $101.1 million of the net proceeds to redeem all of the
outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock (including all accrued and unpaid dividends and
shares issued upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock), and Series B preferred stock
(including shares issued upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock). As a result of the
conversion of Series C preferred stock and the redemption of all preferred stock on August 7, 2007,
no shares of our preferred stock remain issued and outstanding.
Prior to August 7, 2007, when shares of our Series C preferred stock were issued and
outstanding, we recorded non-cash interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable preferred
stock. Prior to the offering, the valuation of our common stock had a material effect on our
operating results because we accounted for our Series C preferred stock, a mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock that was convertible into shares of common stock, at fair value. Accordingly, we
recorded the increase or decrease in the fair value of our redeemable preferred stock as either an
increase or decrease in interest expense at each reporting period. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, we recorded the related dividend accretion for the change in fair value of
this security of $8.3 million and $25.8 million, respectively, as interest expense. Because all
shares of series C preferred stock were redeemed by us on August 7, 2007, we have not recorded any
non-cash interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable preferred stock for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 (or any other periods after August 7, 2007).
In connection with our initial public offering, we also (1) amended and restated our
certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
2,000,000 to 70,000,000 and preferred stock from 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 and (2) effected a 9 for 1
stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock through a dividend of eight shares of common
stock for each share of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the
initial public offering. All share and per share numbers in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
reflect this stock split for all periods presented.
Recent Acquisitions
We have grown significantly since our predecessor company commenced operations in 1992, in
large part due to acquisitions. We consummated the following acquisitions during the first six
months of 2008 and in 2007:
Business Information
On February 13, 2008, we acquired the assets of Legal and Business Publishers, Inc., which
include The Mecklenburg Times, an 84-year old court and commercial publication located in
Charlotte, North Carolina, and electronic products, including www.mecktimes.com and
www.mecklenburgtimes.com. The Mecklenburg Times serves Mecklenburg County, North Carolina and is
also qualified as a legal newspaper in Union County, North
23
Carolina. We paid $3.3 million in cash for the assets, including $2.8 million paid at closing,
plus an additional $500,000 we paid on May 13, 2008 pursuant to the terms of the purchase
agreement. Under the terms of our agreement with Legal and Business Publishers, we may be obligated
to pay up to an additional $500,000 in the aggregate based upon the revenues we earn from the
assets in the six-month and twelve-month periods following the closing of this acquisition.
On March 30, 2007, we acquired the business information assets of Venture Publications, Inc.,
consisting primarily of several publications serving Mississippi and an annual business trade show,
for $2.8 million in cash. In addition, we paid $600,000 to Venture Publications in April 2008 in
connection with the acquired assets achieving certain revenue targets set forth in the asset
purchase agreement.
Professional Services
On February 22, 2008, APC acquired the mortgage default processing business of the Minnesota
law firm, Wilford & Geske. APC acquired these assets for $13.5 million in cash. We may be obligated
to pay up to an additional $2.0 million in purchase price depending upon the adjusted EBITDA for
this business during the twelve months ending March 31, 2009. At the same time, APC also entered an
exclusive service agreement with Wilford & Geske for the referral of mortgage default, foreclosure,
bankruptcy, eviction, litigation and other mortgage default related files to us for processing. The
agreement is for an initial term of 15 years and is subject to automatically renew for two
additional ten year periods unless either party elects to terminate the term then-in-effect with
prior notice.
On January 9, 2007, APC entered the Indiana market by acquiring the mortgage default
processing service business of the law firm of Feiwell & Hannoy for $13.0 million in cash, a
$3.5 million promissory note payable in two equal annual installments of $1.75 million, the first
of which was paid on January 9, 2008, with no interest accruing on the note, and a 4.5% membership
interest in APC. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement with Feiwell & Hannoy, we were
required to guaranty APCs obligations under the note payable to Feiwell & Hannoy. In connection
with this guaranty, Trott & Trott executed a reimbursement agreement with us, whereby Trott & Trott
agreed to reimburse us for 19.0% (its then-ownership percentage) of any amounts we are required to
pay to Feiwell & Hannoy pursuant to our guaranty of the note. At the same time, APC also entered an
exclusive service agreement with Feiwell & Hannoy for the referral of mortgage default,
foreclosure, bankruptcy, eviction and other mortgage default related files to us for processing.
The agreement is for an initial term of 15 years and is subject to automatically renew for two
additional ten year periods unless either party elects to terminate the term then-in-effect with
prior notice.
We have accounted for each of the acquisitions described above) under the purchase method of
accounting. The results of the acquired mortgage default processing services businesses of
Feiwell & Hannoy and Wilford & Geske have been included in the Professional Services segment, and
the results of the acquired businesses of Venture Publications, Inc. and Legal and Business
Publishers, Inc. have been included in the Business Information segment, in our consolidated
financial statements since the date of such acquisition.
Revenues
We derive revenues from two operating segments, our Business Information Division and our
Professional Services Division. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, our total
revenues were $41.6 million and $83.1 million, respectively, and the percentage of our total
revenues attributed to each of our segments was as follows:
|
|
|
56.4% and 55.6%, respectively, from our Business Information Division; and |
|
|
|
|
43.6% and 44.4%, respectively, from our Professional Services Division. |
Business Information. Our Business Information Division generates revenues primarily from
display and classified advertising, public notices and subscriptions. We sell commercial
advertising which consists of display and classified advertising in our print products and web
sites. We include within our display and classified advertising revenues those revenues generated
by sponsorships, advertising and ticket sales generated by our local
24
events). Our display and classified advertising revenues accounted for 21.1% and 20.4% of our
total revenues and 37.5% and 36.6% of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. We recognize display and classified advertising
revenues upon placement of an advertisement in one of our publications or on one of our web sites.
We recognize display and classified advertising revenues generated by sponsorships, advertising and ticket sales from local events
when those events are held. Advertising revenues are driven primarily by the volume, price and mix
of advertisements published as well as how many local events are held.
We publish 305 different types of public notices in our court and commercial newspapers,
including foreclosure notices, probate notices, notices of fictitious business names, limited
liability company and other entity notices, unclaimed property notices, notices of governmental
hearings and trustee sale notices. During each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, our
public notice revenues accounted for 25.5% of our total revenues. During those same periods, these
revenues accounted for 45.2% and 45.9% of our Business Information Divisions revenues,
respectively. We recognize public notice revenues upon placement of a public notice in one of our
court and commercial newspapers. Public notice revenues are driven by the volume and mix of public
notices published, which are affected by the number of residential mortgage foreclosures in the 13
markets where we are qualified to publish public notices because of the high volume of foreclosure
notices we publish in our court and commercial newspapers. In six of the states in which we publish
public notices, the price for public notices is statutorily regulated, with market forces
determining the pricing for the remaining states.
We sell our business information products primarily through subscriptions. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, our circulation revenues, which consist of subscriptions and
single-copy sales, accounted for 8.8% and 8.5%, respectively, of our total revenues and 15.5% and
15.4%, respectively, of our Business Information Divisions revenues. We recognize subscription
revenues ratably over the subscription periods, which range from three months to multiple years,
with the average subscription period being twelve months. Deferred revenue includes payment for
subscriptions collected in advance that we expect to recognize in future periods. Circulation
revenues are driven by the number of copies sold and the subscription rates charged to customers.
Our other business information revenues, comprising sales from commercial printing and database
information, accounted for 1.0% and 1.2% of our total revenues and 1.8% and 2.1% of our Business
Information Divisions revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. We
recognize our other Business Information revenues upon delivery of the printed or electronic
product to our customers.
Professional Services. Our Professional Services Division generates revenues primarily by
providing mortgage default processing and appellate services through fee-based arrangements.
Through APC, we assist law firms in processing foreclosure, bankruptcy, eviction and, to a lesser
extent, litigation and other mortgage default processing case files for residential mortgages that
are in default. As of June 30, 2008, we provided these services for Trott & Trott, a Michigan law
firm of which David A. Trott, APCs President, is majority shareholder and managing attorney,
Feiwell & Hannoy, an Indiana law firm of which the two shareholders and principal attorneys are
senior executives of APC in Indiana, and the Minnesota law firm, Wilford & Geske. The two
shareholders and principal attorneys of Wilford & Geske are executive vice presidents of APC.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we serviced approximately 36,700 and 73,300
mortgage default case files, respectively (approximately 10.0% and
7.2% of which, respectively, were referred to us by Wilford & Geske, whose mortgage default processing
services business we acquired in February 2008), and our mortgage default processing service revenues accounted for 35.7% and 35.9%,
respectively, of our total revenues and 81.8% and 81.0%, respectively, of our Professional Services
Divisions revenues. We believe mortgage default file volume, and thus mortgage default processing revenues, tend to be lower in the
second quarter of each year because homeowners receive income tax refunds that they can apply towards their residential mortgages during the second quarter. We recognize mortgage default processing service revenues on a ratable basis
over the period during which the services are provided, which was generally 31 to 64 days for
Trott & Trott, 31 to 270 days for Feiwell & Hannoy, and 37 to 223 days for Wilford & Geske. We
consolidate the operations, including revenues, of APC and record a minority interest adjustment
for the percentage of earnings that we do not own. See Minority Interests in Net Income of
Subsidiary for a description of the impact of the minority interests in APC on our operating
results. We bill Trott & Trott, Wilford & Geske and Feiwell & Hannoy (for non-foreclosure files)
for services performed and record amounts billed for services not yet performed as deferred
revenue. On foreclosure files, we bill Feiwell & Hannoy in two installments and record amounts for
services performed but not yet billed as unbilled services and amounts billed for services not yet
performed as deferred revenue.
25
We have entered into long-term services agreements with each of our law firm customers. These
agreements provide for the exclusive referral of files from the law firms to APC for servicing,
except that, in the case of Trott & Trotts agreement, Trott & Trott may refer files elsewhere if
it is otherwise directed by its clients. These agreements have initial terms of fifteen years,
which terms may be automatically extended for up to two successive ten year periods unless either
party elects to terminate the term then-in-effect with prior notice. Under each services agreement,
we are paid a fixed fee for each residential mortgage default file referred by the law firm to us
for servicing, with the amount of such fixed fee being based upon the type of file. We receive this
fixed fee upon referral of a foreclosure case file, which consists of any mortgage default case
file referred to us, regardless of whether the case actually proceeds to foreclosure. If such file
leads to a bankruptcy, eviction or litigation proceeding, we are entitled to an additional fixed
fee in connection with handling a file for such proceedings. We also receive a fixed fee for
handling files in eviction, litigation and bankruptcy matters that do not originate from mortgage
foreclosure files.
APCs revenues are primarily driven by the number of residential mortgage defaults in each of
the states in which it does business as well as how many of the files we handle that actually
result in evictions, bankruptcies and/or litigation. Our agreement with Trott &
Trott contemplates the review and possible revision of the fees received by APC every two years
beginning on or before January 1, 2008. Under the Feiwell & Hannoy and Wilford & Geske agreements,
the fixed fee per file increases on an annual basis through 2012 and 2013, respectively, to account
for inflation as measured by the consumer price index. In each year after 2012 (for Feiwell &
Hannoy) and 2013 (for Wilford & Geske), APC and such customer will review and possibly revise the
fee schedule for future years. If we are unable to negotiate fixed fee increases under these
agreements that at least take into account the increases in costs associated with providing
mortgage default processing services, our operating and net margins could be adversely affected.
During the first quarter of 2008 in accordance with their respective services agreements, we
revised our fee structure with Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy, increasing the fixed per file
fee paid for each file referred to us. At the same time, we also agreed to extend the payment terms
for Trott & Trott from 30 to 45 days.
Through Counsel Press, we assist law firms and attorneys throughout the United States in
organizing, printing and filing appellate briefs, records and appendices that comply with the
applicable rules of the U.S. Supreme Court, any of the 13 federal courts of appeals and any state
appellate court or appellate division. These revenues tend to be lower in the second quarter of
each year because there are typically fewer appellate filings during such quarter as a result of
court recesses. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, our appellate service revenues
accounted for 8.0% and 8.5%, respectively, of our total revenues and 18.2% and 19.0%, respectively,
of our Professional Services Divisions revenues. Counsel Press charges its customers primarily on
a per-page basis based on the final appellate product that is filed with the court clerk.
Accordingly, our appellate service revenues are largely determined by the volume of appellate cases
we handle and the number of pages in the appellate cases we file. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, we provided appellate services to attorneys in connection with approximately
2,000 and 4,100 appellate filings, respectively, in federal and state courts. We recognize
appellate service revenues as the services are provided, which is when our final appellate product
is filed with the court.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of compensation and
employee benefits for our editorial personnel in our Business Information Division and the
processing staff at APC and Counsel Press, and production and distribution expenses, such as
compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee benefits for
personnel involved in the production and distribution of our business information products,
the cost of newsprint and the cost of delivery of our business information products; |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of
compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee benefits for our
sales, human resources, accounting and information technology personnel, publishers and
other members of management, rent, other sales and marketing related expenses and other
office-related payments; |
26
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, which represents the cost of fixed assets and software allocated
over the estimated useful lives of these assets, with such useful lives ranging from one to
thirty years; and |
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense, which represents the cost of finite-lived intangibles acquired
through business combinations allocated over the estimated useful lives of these
intangibles, with such useful lives ranging from one to thirty years. |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues depends upon our mix of business from
Professional Services, which is our higher margin revenue, and Business Information. This mix may
shift between fiscal periods.
Equity in Earnings of The Detroit Legal News Publishing
We own 35.0% of the membership interests in The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC (DLNP), the
publisher of The Detroit Legal News and nine other publications. We account for our investment in
DLNP using the equity method. Our percentage share of DLNPs earnings was $1.5 million and
$3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, which we recognized as
operating income. This is net of amortization of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. APC handles all public notices required to be
published in connection with files it services for Trott & Trott pursuant to our services agreement
with Trott & Trott and places a significant amount of these notices in The Detroit Legal News.
Trott & Trott pays DLNP for these public notices. See Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flow
Provided by Operating Activities below for information regarding distributions paid to us by DLNP.
Under the terms of the amended and restated operating agreement for DLNP, on a date that is
within 60 days prior to November 30, 2011, and each November 30th after that, each member of DLNP
has the right, but not the obligation, to deliver a notice to the other members, declaring the
value of all of the membership interests of DLNP. Upon receipt of this notice, each other member
has up to 60 days to elect to either purchase his, her or its pro rata share of the initiating
members membership interests or sell to the initiating member a pro rata portion of the membership
interest of DLNP owned by the non-initiating member. Depending on the election of the other
members, the member that delivered the initial notice of value to the other members will be
required to either sell his or her membership interests, or purchase the membership interests of
other members. The purchase price payable for the membership interests of DLNP will be based on the
value set forth in the initial notice delivered by the initiating member.
Minority Interest in Net Income of Subsidiary
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary for six months ended June 30, 2008 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
a 9.1% membership interest in APC held by (1) Trott & Trott from January 1, 2008 through
January 31, 2008 and (2) APC Investments, LLC, a limited liability company owned by the
shareholders of Trott & Trott, including APC President Dave Trott and APCs two executive
vice presidents in Michigan, from February 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a 2.3% membership interest in APC that Feiwell & Hannoy held for the period of January 1,
2008 through February 21, 2008 and a 2.0% membership interest in APC that Feiwell & Hannoy
held for the period of February 22, 2008 through June 30, 2008. |
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary for the three months ended June 30, 2008 consisted of
a 9.1% and 2.0% membership interest held by APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy, respectively.
You should refer to Recent Developments earlier in this report for information about the
change in our ownership in APC during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and after June 30, 2008.
There was no change in our ownership in APC during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Under the terms of the APC operating agreement, each month, we are required to distribute
APCs earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less debt service with respect
to any interest-bearing indebtedness of APC, capital expenditures and working capital reserves to
APCs members on the basis of common
27
equity interest owned. We paid the following distributions in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
APC Investments* |
|
$ |
436,797 |
|
|
$ |
509,832 |
|
|
$ |
736,760 |
|
|
$ |
919,505 |
|
Feiwell & Hannoy |
|
|
98,415 |
|
|
|
126,439 |
|
|
|
172,146 |
|
|
|
182,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
535,212 |
|
|
$ |
636,271 |
|
|
$ |
908,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,102,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Trott & Trott prior to February 1, 2008 |
In addition, APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy each have the right, for a period of six
months following August 7, 2009 to require APC to repurchase all or any portion of the APC
membership interests held by APC Investments or Feiwell & Hannoy, as the case may be, at a purchase
price based on 6.25 times APCs trailing twelve month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization less the aggregate amount of any interest bearing indebtedness outstanding for APC
as of the date the repurchase occurs. The aggregate purchase price would be payable by APC in the
form of a three-year unsecured note bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 2.0%. In
connection with the closing of the acquisition of NDEx (described in Recent Developments), the
sellers of NDEx, or their designees, will also have these put rights in connection with their
membership interests in APC.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States and the discussion of our financial condition and results
of operations is based on these financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities.
We continually evaluate the policies and estimates we use to prepare our consolidated
financial statements. In general, managements estimates and assumptions are based on historical
experience, information provided by third-party professionals and assumptions that management
believes to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances at the time these estimates and
assumptions are made. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results could
differ significantly from the estimates, assumptions and judgments we use in applying these
critical accounting policies.
We believe the critical accounting policies that require the most significant estimates,
assumptions and judgments to be used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements
are as follows: purchase accounting, valuation of our equity securities as a privately-held
company for periods prior to our initial public offering, impairment of goodwill, other intangible
assets and other long-lived assets, share-based compensation expense, income tax accounting, and
allowances for doubtful accounts. See Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies in Item 7 in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which we filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008, and available at the
SECs web site at www.sec.gov, for a discussion (in addition to that provided below) as to how we
apply these policies.
Purchase Accounting
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we applied purchase accounting to the acquisition
of the assets of Midwest Law Printing Co., Inc. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we
applied purchase accounting to the following acquisitions: (1) the assets of Legal and Business
Publishers, Inc., including The Mecklenberg Times; (2) the mortgage default processing services
business of Wilford & Geske; (3) the assets of Minnesota Political Press, Inc. and Quadriga
Communications, LLC; and (4) the acquisition of the assets of Midwest Law Printing Co., Inc. See
Note 3 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for more information about the application of purchase accounting to
these acquisitions.
28
Valuation of Our Company Equity Securities
Prior to the consummation of our initial public offering when we redeemed all issued and
outstanding shares of our preferred stock, there was no market for our common stock. As a result,
the valuation of our common stock had a material effect on our operating results because we
accounted for our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock at fair value. Accordingly, we recorded
the increase or decrease in the fair value of our redeemable preferred stock as either an increase
or decrease in interest expense in each reporting period. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $26.3 million and $56.3 million,
respectively. There was not a similar expense for the three or six months ended June 30, 2008 or
other periods after August 7, 2007, the date on which we redeemed all outstanding shares of our
preferred stock. Determining the fair value of our redeemable preferred stock (for periods before
August 7, 2007) required us to value two components: (1) the fixed redeemable portion and (2) the
common stock conversion portion.
We determined the fair value of the fixed portion by calculating the present value of the
amount that was mandatorily redeemable, including accreted dividends, on July 31, 2010 as of each
balance sheet date. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we used a discount rate of 13.0% to
calculate such present value based on a weighted average cost of capital analysis.
We used the initial public offering price of $14.50 per share as the fair value of our common
stock to determine the fair value of our series C preferred stock and calculate the non-cash
interest expense related to redeemable preferred stock for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
For information about the objective and subjective factors we considered in estimating the
fair value of common stock as of June 30, 2007, please refer to Management Discussion and
Analysis-Critical Accounting Policies-Valuation of Our Company Equity Securities in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008.
Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
We determine the estimated economic lives and related amortization expense for our intangible
assets. To the extent actual useful lives are less than our previously estimated lives, we will
increase our amortization expense. If the unamortized balance were deemed to be unrecoverable, we
would recognize an impairment charge to the extent necessary to reduce the unamortized balance to
the amount of expected future discounted cash flows, with the amount of such impairment charged to
operations in the current period. We estimate useful lives of our intangible assets by reference to
current and projected dynamics in the business information and mortgage default processing service
industries and anticipated competitor actions. The amount of net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 would have been approximately $0.5 million higher if the actual useful lives of our
finite-lived intangible assets were 10% longer than the estimates and approximately $0.6 million
lower if the actual useful lives of our finite-lived intangible assets were 10% shorter than the
estimates. You should refer to the discussion on new accounting pronouncements in Note 1 of our
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for more information about FSP 142-3, which deals with determining the useful life of
recognized intangible assets and will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2009.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees and non-employee
directors, including grants of stock options and shares of restricted stock, be recognized in the
financial statements based on the estimated fair value of the equity or liability instruments
issued. We estimate the fair value of share-based awards that contain performance conditions using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant date, with compensation expense recognized as
the requisite service is rendered.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we granted stock options exercisable for 419,056
shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $16.52. These stock options were granted under
the 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan. Grantees forfeited options to purchase 51,516 shares of our
common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The majority of these forfeitures were from
four directors whose services with us terminated in May 2008
29
as a result of the expiration of their term on our board, resignation from our board or death.
In 2008, we have applied a zero percent forfeiture rate for stock options.
The following weighted average assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to estimate the fair value of the stock options we granted during 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Expected term of options |
|
4.75 years |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
All options granted in 2008 are non-qualified options that vest in four equal annual
installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire seven years after the
grant date.
Our share-based compensation expense for all granted options under SFAS 123(R) for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $287,000 and $11,000, respectively, before
income taxes and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, was approximately $553,000 and
$21,000, respectively, before income taxes. As of June 30, 2008, our estimated aggregate
unrecognized share-based compensation expense for all unvested stock options was $5.0 million,
which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.4 years.
Our 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock awards that
may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain restrictions have lapsed. The share-based
expense for restricted stock awards is determined based on the market price of our stock on the
date of grant applied to the total number of shares that are anticipated to fully vest. During the
six months ended June 30, 2008, we granted 54,139 shares of restricted stock to management
employees. For these grants, we used the closing share price of our common stock on the grant date
to determine the value of our restricted stock awards. Compensation expense is amortized over the
vesting period. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, grantees forfeited 11,575 shares of
restricted stock. The forfeited shares of restricted stock are deemed to be issued but not
outstanding. In 2008, we applied an estimated forfeiture rate of ten percent for restricted stock
awards issued to all non-management employees and zero percent for restricted stock awards issued
to management employees. Substantially all of these restricted shares vest in four equal annual
installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date.
Our share-based compensation expense for all restricted shares under SFAS 123(R) for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $106,000 and $239,000, respectively, before
income taxes. There was no comparable expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007
because the Company had no outstanding grants of restricted stock during those periods. As of June
30, 2008, our estimated aggregate unrecognized share-based compensation expense for all unvested
restricted shares was $2.4 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of
approximately 3.4 years.
We have reserved 2,700,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our incentive
compensation plan. There were 1,125,666 shares available for issuance under the plan as of June 30,
2008. This includes shares underlying stock options that our board authorized us to grant to two
non-employee directors in connection with their election to our board during June and July 2008.
The number of shares underlying the options authorized to be granted to these directors is not
known at this time because it is based upon the fair market value of a share of our common stock on
the grant date and the grant date will be August 11, 2008.
Income Taxes
The provision of income taxes is based upon estimated annual effective tax rates in the tax
jurisdictions in which we operate. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we used an
effective tax rate of 41% and 38%, respectively, based on our annual projected income in accordance
with APB No. 28.
We consider accounting for income taxes critical to our operations because management is
required to make significant subjective judgments in developing our provision for income taxes,
including the determination of
30
deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowances that may be required against
deferred tax assets. In addition, we operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject
to audit in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which could require an
extended period of time to resolve. The completion of these audits could result in an increase to
amounts previously paid to the taxing jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service recently
commenced an audit of our federal tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2005. We do not
believe any adjustments, if issued, would have a material impact on our financial position.
Accounts Receivable Allowances
We extend credit to our advertisers, public notice publishers, commercial printing customers
and professional service customers based upon an evaluation of each customers financial condition,
and collateral is generally not required. We establish allowances for doubtful accounts based on
estimates of losses related to customer receivable balances. Specifically, we use prior credit
losses as a percentage of credit sales, the aging of accounts receivable and specific
identification of potential losses to establish reserves for credit losses on accounts receivable.
We believe that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to our Business
Information Division. We had a significant concentration of credit risk with respect to our
Professional Services Division as of June 30, 2008 because the amount due from Trott & Trott was
$6.5 million, or 26.0% of our consolidated net accounts receivable balance, and the amount due from
Feiwell & Hannoy was $4.0 million, or 15.9% of our consolidated net receivable balance. However, to
date, we have not experienced any problems with respect to collecting prompt payment from Trott &
Trott or from Feiwell & Hannoy, each of which are required to remit all amounts due to APC with
respect to files serviced by APC in accordance with the time periods agreed to by the parties.
We consider accounting for our allowance for doubtful accounts critical to both of our
operating segments because of the significance of accounts receivable to our current assets and
operating cash flows. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be required, which
could have a material effect on our financial statements. See Liquidity and Capital Resources
below for information regarding our receivables, allowance for doubtful accounts and day sales
outstanding.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements earlier
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for information about new accounting pronouncements affecting
us.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We present three non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted EBITDA, cash earnings and cash earnings per
diluted share measures.
Adjusted EBITDA
The adjusted EBITDA measure presented consists of net income (loss) before:
|
|
|
non-cash interest expense related to redeemable preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
interest expense, net; |
|
|
|
|
income tax expense; |
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash compensation expense; and |
|
|
|
|
minority interest in net income of subsidiary; |
and after:
|
|
|
minority interest distributions paid. |
31
Managements Use of Adjusted EBITDA
We are providing adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, along with GAAP measures, as a
measure of profitability because adjusted EBITDA helps us evaluate and compare our performance on a
consistent basis for different periods of time. We believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have
defined it, helps us evaluate and compare our performance on a consistent basis for different
periods of time by removing from our operating results the impact of the non-cash interest expense
arising from the common stock conversion option in our Series C preferred stock (which had no
impact on our financial performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, because we
redeemed all of our outstanding shares of preferred stock, including shares issued upon conversion
of the Series C preferred stock, in connection with our initial public offering on August 7,
2007), as well as the impact of our net cash or borrowing position, operating in different tax
jurisdictions and the accounting methods used to compute depreciation and amortization, which
impact has been significant and fluctuated from time to time due to the variety of acquisitions
that we have completed since our inception. Similarly, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA also
excludes non-cash compensation expense because this is a non-cash charge for stock options and
restricted shares of common stock that we have granted. We exclude this non-cash expense from
adjusted EBITDA because we believe any amount we are required to record as share-based compensation
expense contains subjective assumptions over which our management has no control, such as share
price and volatility.
We also adjust EBITDA for minority interest in net income of subsidiary and cash distributions
paid to minority members of APC because we believe this provides more timely and relevant
information with respect to our financial performance. We exclude amounts with respect to minority
interest in net income of subsidiary because this is a non-cash adjustment that does not reflect
amounts actually paid to APCs minority members because (1) distributions for any month are
actually paid by APC in the following month and (2) it does not include adjustments for APCs debt
or capital expenditures, which are both included in the calculation of amounts actually paid to
APCs minority members. We instead include the amount of these cash distributions in adjusted
EBITDA because they include these adjustments and reflect amounts actually paid by APC, thus
allowing for a more accurate determination of our performance and ongoing obligations.
We believe that adjusted EBITDA is meaningful information about our business operations that
investors should consider along with our GAAP financial information. We use adjusted EBITDA for
planning purposes, including the preparation of internal annual operating budgets, and to measure
our operating performance and the effectiveness of our operating strategies. We also use a
variation of adjusted EBITDA in monitoring our compliance with certain financial covenants in our
credit agreement and are using adjusted EBITDA to determine performance-based short-term incentive
payments for our executive officers and other key employees.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that has limitations because it does not include all
items of income and expense that affect our operations. This non-GAAP financial measure is not
prepared in accordance with, and should not be considered an alternative to, measurements required
by GAAP, such as operating income, net income (loss), net income (loss) per share, cash flow from
continuing operating activities or any other measure of performance or liquidity derived in
accordance with GAAP. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered
in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. In addition, it
should be noted that companies calculate adjusted EBITDA differently and, therefore, adjusted
EBITDA as presented for us may not be comparable to the calculations of adjusted EBITDA reported by
other companies.
32
The following is a reconciliation of our net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
$ |
(21,858 |
) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense related to
redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,260 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Amortization of DLNP intangible |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
Cash distributions to minority interest |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
11,947 |
|
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
|
$ |
25,442 |
|
|
$ |
20,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Earnings and Cash Earnings per Diluted Share
The cash earnings measure presented consists of net income (loss) before:
|
|
|
non-cash interest expense related to redeemable preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash interest income related to the change in fair value of interest rate swaps; |
|
|
|
|
amortization expense; and |
|
|
|
|
an adjustment to income tax expense related to the
reconciling items above at a 41% tax rate. |
We calculate the cash earnings per diluted share measure presented by dividing cash earnings by the
weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding during the period.
Managements Use of Cash Earnings and Cash Earnings Per Diluted Share
We are providing cash earnings and cash earnings per diluted share, both non-GAAP financial
measures, along with GAAP measures, as a measure of profitability because they are commonly used by
financial analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating companies performance.
In addition, we are providing cash earnings per diluted share in part because it offers investors
a per-share metric, in addition to GAAP measures, in evaluating our performance. We believe these
non-GAAP measures, as we have defined them, help us evaluate and compare our performance on a
consistent basis for different periods of time by removing from our operating results non-cash interest expense related to our redeemable preferred stock (which had no impact on our
financial performance for periods after August 7, 2007 when we redeemed all outstanding shares of
preferred stock, including shares issued upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock); non cash
interest expense related to the change in the fair value of our interest rate swaps; amortization,
which is a significant non-cash expense that has fluctuated from time to time due to acquisitions
we have completed since our inception and income tax expense related to these items.
Although cash earnings and cash earnings per share are new metrics for us, we believe that
they provide meaningful information about our business operations that investors should consider
along with our GAAP financial information. We have begun using these metrics to measure our
operating performance and the effectiveness of our operating strategies. We intend to use cash
earnings and cash earnings per diluted share for planning purposes, including the preparation of
internal annual operating budgets for the next calendar year.
Cash earnings and cash earnings per share are both non-GAAP measures that have limitations
because they do not include all items of income and expense that affect our operations. Neither of
these non-GAAP financial measures are prepared in accordance with, and should not be considered an
alternative to, measurements required by GAAP, such as operating income, net income (loss), net
income (loss) per diluted share or any other measure of
33
performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of this additional
information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly
comparable GAAP measures. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate cash earnings
and cash earnings per diluted share differently and, therefore, cash earnings and cash earnings per
diluted share as presented for us may not be comparable to the calculations of cash earnings and
cash earnings per diluted share reported by other companies.
The following is a reconciliation of the companys net income (loss) to cash earnings and cash
earnings per diluted share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June
30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
$ |
(21,858 |
) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense related to
redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,260 |
|
Non-cash interest income related to the
change in fair value of interest rate
swaps |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
Amortization of DLNP intangible |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Adjustment to income tax expense related
to reconciling items at a 41% tax rate |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash earnings |
|
$ |
5,293 |
|
|
$ |
4,186 |
|
|
$ |
11,512 |
|
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per diluted share (GAAP) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
Cash earnings per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
25,307,422 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
|
|
25,246,279 |
|
|
|
9,324,000 |
|
34
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected operating results, including as a percentage of total
revenues, for the periods indicated below (in thousands, except
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Information |
|
$ |
23,424 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
$ |
21,588 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
% |
Professional Services |
|
|
18,129 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
15,467 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
41,553 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
37,055 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Information |
|
|
19,585 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
16,869 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
% |
Professional Services |
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
11,141 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
34,828 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
% |
|
|
30,753 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
% |
Equity in earnings of The Detroit Legal
News Publishing, LLC, net of amortization |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
Non-cash interest expense related to
redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(26,318 |
) |
|
|
(71.0 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
(20,084 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
$ |
(21,858 |
) |
|
|
(59.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
11,947 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per diluted share (GAAP) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash earnings per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Information |
|
$ |
46,196 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
% |
|
$ |
41,068 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
% |
Professional Services |
|
|
36,869 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
31,682 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
83,065 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
72,750 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Information |
|
|
37,937 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
% |
|
|
32,771 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
Professional Services |
|
|
26,054 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
22,273 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
68,134 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
% |
|
|
59,124 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
% |
Equity in earnings of The Detroit Legal
News Publishing, LLC, net of amortization |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17,957 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
15,871 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
Non-cash interest expense related to
redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(56,260 |
) |
|
|
(77.3 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(2,738 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
(43,830 |
) |
|
|
(60.2 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,786 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4,107 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,404 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(49,644 |
) |
|
|
(68.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
25,442 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
$ |
20,854 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per diluted share (GAAP) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash earnings per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
The increase in total revenues consists of the following:
|
|
|
$1.9 million of revenues from businesses we acquired on or after April 1, 2007, which we
refer to as acquired businesses. These revenues consisted of: (1) $0.6 million in revenues
from the assets of Legal and Business Publishers, Inc. (including The Mecklenburg Times)
acquired on February 13, 2008; and (2) $1.4 million in revenues from the mortgage default
processing services business of Wilford & Geske acquired on February 22, 2008. Acquired
businesses do not include fold in acquisitions, which we define below. |
|
|
|
|
$2.6 million of revenues from organic revenue growth. We define organic revenue growth as
the net increase in revenue produced by: (1) businesses we owned and operated prior to April
1, 2007, which we refer to as existing businesses; (2) customer lists, goodwill or other
finite-life intangibles we purchased on or after April 1, 2007, and integrated into our
existing businesses; and (3) businesses that we account for as acquisitions under the
purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations, but
do not report separately for internal financial purposes, which we refer to as fold in
acquisitions. |
We derived 56.4% and 58.3% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division and 43.6%
and 41.7% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This slight change in mix resulted primarily from a $2.9
million, or 36.9%, increase in public notice revenues in our Business Information Division, a $2.8
million, or 23.1%, increase in mortgage default processing services revenues in our Professional
Services Division and a $1.0 million, or 9.9%, decrease in display and classified advertising in our
Business Information Division. We expect that our Professional Services Division will account for
a larger portion of our total revenues during the remainder of 2008 as a result of the anticipated
closing of the acquisition of NDEx, which we expect will occur in the third quarter of 2008, and
the anticipated reduced spending on display and classified advertising by our customers due to
local economic conditions.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Operating expenses attributable to our corporate operations (included in selling, general and
administrative expenses) decreased $0.6 million, or 22.0%, to $2.1 million, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008, from $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. These expenses
consist primarily of the cost of compensation and employee benefits for our human resources,
accounting and information technology personnel, executive officers and other members of
management, as well as unallocated portions of corporate insurance costs and costs associated with
being a public company. The decrease in operating expenses attributable to corporate operations
was primarily the result of a change we made in the accounting estimate related to our medical
self-insurance reserve to more closely reflect past claims history. This resulted in a $0.5 million
reduction in expense in the three months ended June 2008. Other cost increases in the three months
ended June 30, 2008 (primarily increased stock-based compensation costs, insurance costs, and
professional services) were offset by the June 2007 write-off of split dollar life insurance that
we cancelled for certain of our executive officers in connection with our initial public
36
offering. Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased slightly to 83.8%
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 83.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Direct Operating Expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses consisted of a $1.1
million increase in our Business Information Division and a $1.2 million increase in our
Professional Services Division. These increases were largely due to increased operating costs
resulting from acquisitions occurring in the first three months of 2008 and increased production
activity (including increased public notices, events, and increased file volumes in our mortgage
default processing service business). You should refer to the more detailed discussions in the
Business Information Division Results and Professional Services Division Results below for more
information regarding the causes of this increase. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of
revenue increased to 35.1% as of June 30, 2008 from 33.3% as of June 30, 2007 due to an increase in
the production costs discussed above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted of a $1.5 million increase in our Business Information Division,
a $0.3 million increase in our Professional Services Division, and a $0.7 million decrease in
unallocated corporate costs as discussed above. These increases primarily relate to increased
costs of operating acquired businesses, increased salary expenses resulting from additional
headcount required to meet business needs and other increased personnel costs, including $0.4
million of stock-based compensation expense recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses also increased in the three months ended June 30, 2008
as a result of $0.5 million of expenses we incurred in connection with being a public company. We
expect our selling, general and administrative expenses to increase for the remainder of 2008 by at
least $1.2 million as a result of these costs, including costs we expect to incur as we prepare to
comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require annual
management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and an
attestation report by our independent auditors on our internal control over financial reporting
beginning with the year ending December 31, 2008. You should refer to the more detailed discussions
in the Business Information Division Results and Professional Services Division Results below for
more information regarding the causes of this increase. Selling, general and administrative expense
as a percentage of revenue decreased from 42.3% as of June 30, 2007 to 40.3% as of June 30, 2008.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense increased due to increased
levels of property and equipment in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Our amortization expense
increased due primarily to the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the
February 2008 acquisitions as well as the repurchase of interests in APC from our minority members
in November 2007. Because we intend to allocate substantially all of the intangibles to be acquired
from NDEx upon closing to the long-term service agreements, we expect our amortization expense to
increase significantly in future periods.
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and discussed above) and adjusted EBITDA margin (adjusted EBITDA
as a percentage of our total revenues) increased because of the cumulative effect of the factors
described in this Management Discussion and Analysis that are applicable to the calculation of
adjusted EBITDA. Our adjusted EBITDA margin increased in part as a result of increases in higher
margin revenue streams, such as public notice and mortgage default processing services.
Cash Earnings and Cash Earnings per Diluted Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
Cash earnings (in millions) |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
Cash earning per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
(53.4 |
%) |
Cash earnings (as defined and discussed above) increased $1.1 million, or $26.4%, to $5.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $4.2 million for the same period in 2007
because of the cumulative effect of the
37
factors described in this Management Discussion and Analysis that are applicable to the
calculation of cash earnings. Cash earnings per diluted share (as defined and discussed above)
decreased to $0.21 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $0.45 for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 because of the increase in the number of diluted weighted average shares outstanding
from 9.3 million diluted weighted average shares at June 30, 2007 to 25.3 million diluted weighted
average shares at June 30, 2008. This increase in diluted
weighted shares outstanding occurred in connection with our initial
public offering in August 2007.
Non-Cash Interest Expense Related to Redeemable Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
interest redeemable
preferred stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Non-cash interest expense related to redeemable preferred stock consisted of non-cash interest
expense related to the dividend accretion on our Series A preferred stock and Series C preferred
stock and the change in the fair value of our Series C preferred stock. In connection with our
initial public offering, we converted the series C preferred stock into shares of Series A
preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and common stock. We then used a portion of the net
proceeds of the offering to redeem the Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock,
including shares of Series A preferred stock and series B preferred stock issued upon conversion of
the Series C preferred stock. As a result of this redemption, there are currently no shares of
preferred stock issued and outstanding. Therefore, we have not recorded, and do not expect to
record, any non-cash interest expense related to our preferred stock for other periods after
August 7, 2007, including the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Decrease |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(79.4 |
)% |
Interest expense, net consists primarily of interest expense on outstanding borrowings under
our bank credit facility and the change in the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps,
offset partially by interest income from our invested cash balances. Interest expense, net
decreased due primarily to $0.6 million of increased interest income in connection with our
interest rate swaps because of an increase in interest rates, as well as $0.6 million decreased
interest in connection with our bank credit facility due to decreased average outstanding
borrowings under our bank credit facility. Under the terms of our credit facility, we are required
to manage our exposure to certain interest rate changes, and therefore, we use interest rate swaps
to manage our risk to certain interest rate changes associated with a portion of our floating rate
long-term debt. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, our average outstanding borrowings were
$73.1 million compared to $91.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. An increase in
outstanding borrowings to finance acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 was offset by the $30 million
reduction in debt paid with proceeds from our initial public offering. We expect our average
outstanding borrowings to increase significantly in the third quarter as a result of indebtedness
we will incur in connection with the pending acquisition of NDEx.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
213.0 |
% |
Our income tax expense increased because of the effect our non-cash interest expense (which we
have not recorded for periods after August 7, 2007) had on taxable income in 2007. For 2008, we
project our effective tax rate to be 40.8%. The increase in the projected effective tax rate from
2007 is due to state taxes, primarily from increased taxes in Michigan due to its new tax law. In
2007, our effective tax rate of 38.4% differs from the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax
rate of 35.0% due to the non-cash interest expense that we recorded for dividend accretion and the
change in the fair value of our series C preferred stock of $26.3 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2007, which was not deductible for tax purposes.
38
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Total Business Information Division Revenues |
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
% |
Circulation revenues |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(44.2 |
)% |
Our display and classified advertising revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease in the
number of ads placed in our publications. We expect our display and classified advertising
revenues to continue to decline as our customers tighten discretionary spending in light of local
economic conditions in the markets we serve. Our public notice revenues increased primarily due to
the increased number of foreclosure notices placed in our publications and, to a lesser extent, the
acquisition of the assets of Legal and Business Publishers, Inc. in February 2008. Other revenues
declined as a result of our decision to downscale the commercial printing services provided by our
press operations so that we can focus on quality related to the printing of our publications.
Circulation revenues increased slightly despite a decline in the number of paid subscribers
between June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, our paid publications had
approximately 69,600 subscribers (including approximately 1,300 paid subscribers from the
acquisition of The Mecklenburg Times from Legal and Business Publishers, Inc. in February 2008), a
decrease of approximately 3,900, or 5.3%, from total paid subscribers of approximately 73,500 as of
June 30, 2007. The majority of this decrease in paid subscribers over these periods continues to
be a result of: (1) non-renewals of discounted bulk subscriptions at several law firms; (2) low
response rates to circulation promotions and a decline in renewals of first-year subscribers for
LawyersUSA; and (3) timing issues related to Newspapers In Education paid subscriptions programs.
We believe reader preference for on-line and web site access to our business journals, some of
which we offer at discounted rates or no fee, has also contributed to a decline in subscribers to
our publications and thus negatively impacted circulation revenues. Revenues we lost from the
decline in paid subscribers were offset by increased newsstand sales and an increase in the average
price per paid subscription.
The business information products we target to the Missouri markets and the Minnesota market
each accounted for over 10% of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, The Daily Record in Maryland had also
accounted for over 10% of our Business Information Divisions revenues. As a result of a planned
reduction in commercial printing sales, this units revenues have dropped slightly below 10% in the
second quarter of 2008.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Direct operating expenses increased primarily due to increased public notice placements, new
publications, and events, resulting in higher production-related costs such as printing, postage,
delivery and event costs. Additionally, $0.1 million of operating costs related to the assets of
Legal and Business Publishers that we acquired in February 2008 contributed to the increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to a $0.9 million increase in certain
discretionary spending items, primarily information technology costs related to maintaining our web
sites, $0.3 million of additional bad debt expense, $0.2 million of costs in connection with the
acquired business of Legal and Business Publishers, and $0.1 million of increased stock
compensation costs. Total operating expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a
percentage of Business Information Division revenue
39
increased to 83.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 78.1% for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. This increase is due to the collective effects of the increases discussed
above.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total Professional Services Division revenues |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Mortgage default processing service revenues |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
Appellate services revenues |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Professional Services Division revenues increased primarily due to the increase in mortgage
default processing service revenues. This increase was attributable to $1.3 million in revenues
from APCs mortgage default processing service businesses that we acquired from Wilford & Geske in
February 2008, as well as an increase in the number of mortgage default case files processed in
three months ended June 30, 2008 for our other two customers and an increase in the fee per file
APC charges to Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we
serviced approximately 36,700 mortgage default case files for our law
firm customers (approximately 10.0% of which were referred to us by
Wilford & Geske, whose mortgage default processing services
business we acquired in February 2008), compared to approximately 29,700
mortgage default case files that we serviced for clients of our law firm customers for the three
months ended June 30, 2007.
The decrease in appellate services revenues resulted from the completion of fewer appellate
filings in the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007
(approximately 2,000 in 2008 compared to approximately 2,200 in 2007).
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
Direct operating expenses increased as a result of increases in personnel expenses at APC.
These personnel expenses increased as a result of adding additional staff in connection with an
increase in the number of files processed between June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008. In addition, APC
incurred an additional $0.4 million of costs (including personnel costs) from operating the
mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske, which we acquired in late
February 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to the
inclusion of $0.3 million of costs associated with operating the mortgage default processing
services business of Wilford & Geske we acquired in February 2008.
Amortization expense increased due to the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets
associated with the acquisition of the mortgage default processing business of Wilford & Geske in
February 2008, as well as our purchase of membership interests in APC from its minority members in
November 2007. Total operating expenses attributable to our Professional Services Division as a
percentage of Professional Services Division revenue increased slightly to 72.3% for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from 72.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
40
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
83.1 |
|
|
$ |
72.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
The increase in total revenues consists of the following:
|
|
|
$3.5 million of revenues from businesses we acquired on or after January 1, 2007, which
we refer to as acquired businesses. These revenues consisted of: (1) $0.7 million in
revenues from the assets of Venture Publications (including the Mississippi Business
Journal) acquired on March 30, 2007; (2) $0.9 million in revenues from the assets of Legal
and Business Publishers (including The Mecklenburg Times) acquired on February 13, 2008; and
(3) $2.0 million in revenues from the mortgage default processing services business of
Wilford & Geske acquired on February 22, 2008. Acquired businesses do not include fold in
acquisitions, which we define below. |
|
|
|
|
$6.8 million of revenues from organic revenue growth. We define organic revenue growth as
the net increase in revenue produced by: (1) businesses we owned and operated prior to
January 1, 2007, which we refer to as existing businesses; (2) customer lists, goodwill or
other finite-life intangibles we purchased on or after January 1, 2007, and integrated into
our existing businesses; and (3) businesses that we account for as acquisitions under the
purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations, but
do not report separately for internal financial purposes, which we refer to as fold in
acquisitions. |
We derived 55.6% and 56.5% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division and 44.4%
and 43.5% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This slight change in mix resulted from a $5.9 million, or
38.7%, increase in public notice revenues in our Business Information Division, as well as changes
in our Professional Services Division, including a $5.7 million, or 23.5%, increase in mortgage
default processing services revenues and a $0.5 million, or 6.6%, decline in appellate services
revenues.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
59.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Operating expenses attributable to our corporate operations remained flat at $4.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These expenses consist primarily of the cost of
compensation and employee benefits for our human resources, accounting and information technology
personnel, executive officers and other members of management, as well as unallocated portions of
corporate insurance costs and costs associated with being a public company. An increase in
operating expenses attributable to corporate operations due to increased stock-based compensation
costs, insurance costs, and professional services, was offset by a $0.5 million adjustment to our
self-insurance medical accrual booked in June 2008, discussed above, as well as the June 2007
write-off of split dollar life insurance that we cancelled for certain of our executive officers in
connection with our initial public offering. Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues
increased slightly to 82.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 81.3% for the six months
ended June 30, 2007.
41
Direct Operating Expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses consisted of a $1.8
million increase in each of our Business Information Division and our Professional Services
Division, which were largely due to increased operating costs due to acquisitions, increased
volumes in both divisions, and annual salary increases and other increased personnel costs,
including $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense recorded in the six months ended June
30, 2008. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in the Business Information Division
Results and Professional Services Division Results below for more information regarding the causes
of this increase. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenue increased slightly to 34.3%
as of June 30, 2008 from 34.1% as of June 30, 2007.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted of a $3.1 million increase in our Business Information Division,
a $0.9 million increase in our Professional Services Division, and a $0.1 million decrease in
unallocated corporate costs as discussed above. These increases primarily relate to increased
costs of operating acquired businesses, increased salary expenses resulting from additional
headcount required to meet business needs and other increased personnel costs, including $0.7
million of stock-based compensation expense recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses also increased in the first six months of 2008 as a
result of $0.8 million of expenses we incurred in connection with being a public company. You
should refer to the more detailed discussions in the Business Information Division Results and
Professional Services Division Results below for more information regarding the causes of this
increase. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue decreased slightly
to 39.5% as of June 30, 2008 from 39.8% as of June 30, 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense increased due to increased
levels of property and equipment in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our amortization expense
increased due primarily to the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the
February 2008 acquisitions, as well as the repurchase of interests in APC from our minority members
in November 2007.
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and discussed above) and adjusted EBITDA margin (adjusted EBITDA
as a percentage of our total revenues) increased due to the cumulative effect of the factors
described in this Management Discussion and Analysis that are applicable to the calculation of
adjusted EBITDA. Our adjusted EBITDA margin increased in part as a result of increases in higher
margin revenue streams, such as public notice and mortgage default processing services.
Cash Earnings and Cash Earnings per Diluted Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
Cash earnings (in millions) |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Cash earnings per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
|
(51.2 |
%) |
Cash earnings (as defined and discussed above) increased $2.8 million, or 32.1%, to $11.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $8.7 million for the same period in 2007
because of the cumulative effect of the factors described in this Management Discussion and
Analysis that are applicable to the calculation of cash earnings. Cash earnings per diluted share
(as defined and discussed above) decreased to $0.46 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from
$0.93 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 because of the increase in the number of diluted
weighted average shares outstanding from 9.3 million diluted weighted average shares at June 30,
2007 to 25.2 million diluted weighted average shares at
June 30, 2008. This increase in diluted weighted average shares
outstanding occurred in connection with our initial public offering in August 2007.
42
Non-Cash Interest Expense Related to Redeemable Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Decrease |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Non-cash interest
expense related to
redeemable
preferred stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
(56.3 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Non-cash interest expense related to redeemable preferred stock consisted of non-cash interest
expense related to the dividend accretion on our Series A preferred stock and Series C preferred
stock and the change in the fair value of our Series C preferred stock. In connection with our
initial public offering, we converted the series C preferred stock into shares of Series A
preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and common stock. We then used a portion of the net
proceeds of the offering to redeem the Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock,
including shares of Series A preferred stock and series B preferred stock issued upon conversion of
the Series C preferred stock. As a result of this redemption, there are currently no shares of
preferred stock issued and outstanding. Therefore, we have not recorded, and do not expect to
record, any non-cash interest expense related to our preferred stock for other periods after
August 7, 2007, including the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Decrease |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
)% |
Interest expense, net consists primarily of interest expense on outstanding borrowings under
our bank credit facility and the change in the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps,
offset partially by interest income from our invested cash balances. Interest expense, net
decreased due primarily to $1.3 million of decreased expense in connection with our bank credit
facility due to decreased average outstanding borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in
interest income recorded on our interest rate swaps. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, our
average outstanding borrowings were $69.4 million compared to $90.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. An increase in outstanding borrowings to finance acquisitions in 2008 and 2007
was offset by the $30 million reduction in debt paid with proceeds from our initial public
offering.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
Our income tax expense increased because of the effect our non-cash interest expense (which we
have not recorded for periods after August 7, 2007) had on taxable income in 2007. In 2007, our
effective tax rate of 38.4% differs from the statutory U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of
35.0% due to the non-cash interest expense that we recorded for dividend accretion and the change
in the fair value of our series C preferred stock of $56.3 million in the six months ended June 30,
2007, which was not deductible for tax purposes.
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total Business Information Division Revenues |
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
% |
Circulation revenues |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Other revenues |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(35.3 |
)% |
Our display and classified advertising revenues decreased primarily due to the decrease in the
number of ads placed in our publications, offset partially by an increase due to the acquisition of
the assets of Venture Publications, Inc. Our public notice revenues increased primarily due to the
increased number of foreclosure notices placed in our
43
publications and, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of the assets of Legal and Business
Publishers, Inc. Other revenues declined as a result of our decision to downscale the commercial
printing services provided by our press operations so that we can focus on quality related to the
printing of our publications.
Circulation revenues increased slightly despite a decline in the number of paid subscribers
between June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, our paid publications had
approximately 69,600 subscribers (including approximately 1,300 paid subscribers from the
acquisition of The Mecklenburg Times from Legal and Business Publishers, Inc.), a decrease of
approximately 3,900, or 5.3%, from total paid subscribers of approximately 73,500 as of June 30,
2007. Please refer to the discussion in the above comparison for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 for an explanation regarding the decrease in the number of paid subscribers for our
publications.
One of our paid publications, The Daily Record in Maryland, as well as the business
information products we target to the Missouri markets and the Minnesota market, each accounted for
over 10% of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Direct operating expenses increased primarily due to increased production-related costs
resulting from increases in public notice placements, events, and new publications, as well as an
increase in overall wage costs (including annual salary increases and increased stock-based
compensation expense) and other operating costs such as postage and printing, including $0.3
million of increased costs of the acquired businesses of Venture Publications and Legal and
Business Publishers. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to a
$1.7 million increase in certain discretionary spending items, including $0.9 million of
information technology costs related to maintaining our web sites. Selling, general and
administrative expenses also increased due to $0.8 million of increased costs from acquisitions.
The balance of the increase in the Business Information Division selling, general and
administrative expenses resulted from increases in overall wage costs (including annual salary
increases and increased stock-based compensation expenses) and costs of various marketing
promotions. Total operating expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a
percentage of Business Information Division revenue increased to 82.1% for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 from 79.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is due to the
collective effects of the increases discussed above.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total Professional Services Division revenues |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
Mortgage default processing service revenues |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Appellate services revenues |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
)% |
Professional Services Division revenues increased primarily due to the increase in mortgage
default processing service revenues. This increase was attributable to the revenues from APCs
mortgage default processing service businesses that we acquired from Wilford & Geske in February
2008, as well as an increase in the number of mortgage default case files processed in the first
six months of 2008 for our other two customers and an increase in the fee per file APC charges to
Trott & Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we serviced
approximately 73,300 mortgage default case files for our law firm customers (approximately 7.2% of which were referred to us by Wilford & Geske, whose mortgage default processing services business we acquired in February 2008), compared to approximately 59,700
mortgage default case files that we serviced for clients of our law firm customers for the six
months ended June 30, 2007.
44
The decrease in appellate services revenues primarily resulted from the completion of several
large cases Counsel Press handled in the first six months of 2007. Counsel Press did not handle
any large cases in the six months ended June 30, 2008. In addition, Counsel Press assisted with
fewer appellate filings in the first six months of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007
(approximately 4,100 in 2008 compared to approximately 4,400 in 2007).
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase |
|
|
($s in millions) |
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
% |
Direct operating expenses increased as a result of increases in personnel expenses in APC.
These personnel expenses increased primarily as a result of adding staff in connection with an
increase in the number of files processed between June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and to a lesser
extent overall annual salary increases. In addition, APC incurred an additional $0.5 million of
costs (including personnel costs) associated with our operation of mortgage default processing
services business of Wilford & Geske, which we acquired in late February 2008. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased primarily due to the inclusion of $0.4 million of costs
associated with operating the mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske we
acquired in February 2008, the write off of some professional fees incurred in connection with
evaluating a potential acquisition that we stopped pursuing, and, to a lesser extent, increases in
overall wage costs and health insurance costs.
Amortization expense increased due to the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets
associated with the acquisition of the mortgage default processing business of Wilford & Geske in
February 2008, as well as our purchase of membership interests in APC from its minority members in
November 2007. Total operating expenses attributable to our Professional Services Division as a
percentage of Professional Services Division revenue increased slightly to 70.7% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from 70.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off balance sheet arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, available capacity under our
credit facility, distributions received from DLNP, sales of our equity securities, and available
cash reserves. The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, working capital
(deficit) and long-term debt, less current portion as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, as
well as cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
Working capital (deficit) |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
(5,460 |
) |
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
67,312 |
|
|
|
56,301 |
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
9,574 |
|
|
$ |
12,689 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities: |
|
|
(22,170 |
) |
|
|
(21,545 |
) |
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(19,176 |
) |
|
|
(17,335 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
The most significant inflows of cash are cash receipts from our customers. Operating cash
outflows include payments to employees, payments to vendors for services and supplies and payments
of interest and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased
$3.1 million, or 24.5%, to $9.6 million from $12.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
This decrease was primarily the result of (1) an increase in accounts receivable, due to the
extension of payment terms for Trott & Trott in connection with their revised fee structure, which
we changed during the first quarter of 2008; (2) a decrease in accounts payable, due to the timing
of vendor payments, and (3) a decrease in accrued compensation, due to the payment of year-end
bonuses in the first quarter of 2008, including those for our executive officers.
Working capital increased $6.9 million, or 127.0%, to $1.5 million at June 30, 2008, from
$(5.5) million at December 31, 2007. Current liabilities decreased $1.6 million, or 5.4%, to
$28.8 million at June 30, 2008 from $30.4 million at December 31, 2007. Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities decreased $3.7 million, or 25.7%, to $10.6 million at June 30, 2008 from
$14.3 million at December 31, 2007. Current deferred revenue increased $0.2 million, or 2.2%, to
$11.6 million at June 30, 2008 from $11.4 million at December 31, 2007. Current assets increased
$5.3 million, or 21.2%, to $30.2 million at June 30, 2008 from $24.9 million at December 31, 2007.
This increase was due primarily to the growth of accounts receivable by $4.5 million from
$20.7 million at December 31, 2007 to $25.2 million at June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the
revised payment terms given to Trott & Trott. The increase was also due to a $1.3 million increase
in cash from $1.3 million at December 31, 2007 to $2.6 million at June 30, 2008. This increase was
offset partially by a $0.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets from $2.6 million
at December 31, 2007 to $2.2 million at June 30, 2008.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross receivables and days sales
outstanding, or DSO, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Day sales outstanding |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
We calculate DSO by dividing net receivables by average daily revenue excluding circulation.
Average daily revenue is computed by dividing total revenue by the total number of days in the
period. Our DSO increased from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008 because we extended the payment
terms with Trott & Trott in the first quarter of 2008 from 30 days to 45 days in connection with an
increase to the per file fee we charge Trott & Trott.
We own 35.0% of the membership interests in The Detroit Legal Publishing, LLC, or DLNP, the
publisher of The Detroit Legal News, and received distributions of $3.5 million and $2.8 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The operating agreement for DLNP
provides for us to receive quarterly distribution payments based on our ownership percentage, which
are a significant source of operating cash flow.
Cash Flows Used by Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities increased to $22.2 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 from $21.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Uses of cash in both periods
pertained to acquisitions (both closed acquisitions and pending acquisitions), capital expenditures
and purchases of software. Cash paid for closed acquisitions totaled $19.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and $17.3 million for the six months
46
ended June 30, 2007. Cash paid for pending acquisitions was $0.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and no payments for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Capital expenditures
and purchases of software were approximately $2.3 million and $4.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A new voice over internet protocol telephone system, as well
as spending on our proprietary case management software in Indiana, accounted for about a quarter
of our capital expenditure spending in the first six months of 2008. We incurred the balance of our
capital expenditures this period on various equipment, software and furniture purchases. We
continue to expect the costs for capital expenditures to range between 3.5% and 4.5% of our total
revenues, on an aggregated basis, for the year ending December 31, 2008, which we expect to use
primarily to upgrade our press operations and purchase related machinery and also to move our
corporate offices. In the first six months of 2007, building a new data center to support our
Business Information and Professional Services Division at our suburban Detroit office accounted
for approximately 57.0% of the total capital expenditures for that period.
Finite-lived intangible assets increased $11.9 million, or 13.4%, to $100.8 million at June
30, 2008 from $88.9 million as of December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to
finite-lived intangible assets acquired as part of the acquisition of the assets of Legal and
Business Publishers, Inc., and APCs acquisition of the mortgage default processing services
business of Wilford & Geske. These items were partially offset by increased amortization expense.
Goodwill increased $2.5 million, or 3.2%, to $81.5 million as of June 30, 2008 from
$79.0 million as of December 31, 2007. This increase was due to goodwill acquired as part of APCs
acquisition of the mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske and goodwill
related to additional purchase price in connection with the acquisition of Venture Publications.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities primarily includes borrowings under our revolving
credit agreement and the issuance of long-term debt. Cash used in financing activities generally
includes the repayment of borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and long-term debt, the
redemption of any preferred stock, and the payment of fees associated with the issuance of
long-term debt. For the third quarter of 2008, net cash provided by financing activities will also
include approximately $60.5 million in net proceeds received in late July from the private
placement of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock. We expect to use all of the proceeds of the
private placement to fund, in part, the cash purchase price for the pending acquisition of NDex.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased $4.2 million to $13.9 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $9.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase
was due to the combination of the following: an increase in net borrowings of senior term notes, a
reduction in the net payments on the senior revolving note, and the reduction of payments on senior
long-term debt in the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the six months ended June 30,
2007. Long-term debt, less current portion, increased $11.0 million, or 19.6%, to $67.3 million as
of June 30, 2008 from $56.3 million as of December 31, 2007.
Credit Agreement. On August 8, 2007, we, including our consolidated subsidiaries, entered
into a second amended and restated credit agreement, effective August 8, 2007, with a syndicate of
bank lenders and U.S. Bank National Association, as LC bank and lead arranger and as agent for the
lenders, for a $200 million senior secured credit facility comprised of a term loan facility in an
initial aggregate amount of $50 million due and payable in quarterly installments with a final
maturity date of August 8, 2014 and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$150 million with a final maturity date of August 8, 2012. At any time the outstanding principal
balance of revolving loans under the revolving credit facility exceeds $25 million, such revolving
loans will convert to an amortizing term loan due and payable in quarterly installments with a
final maturity date of August 8, 2014. The second amended and restated credit agreement restated
our original credit agreement in its entirety. It also contains provisions for the issuance of
letters of credit under the revolving credit facility.
On August 7, 2007, we used $30.0 million of net proceeds from our initial public offering to
repay a portion of the outstanding principal balance of the variable term loans outstanding under
our existing credit facility. The remaining balance of the variable term loans and outstanding
revolving loans, plus all accrued interest and fees thereon, was converted to $50.0 million of term
loans under the term loan facility and approximately $9.1 million of revolving loans under the
revolving credit facility. In February 2008, we drew down $16.0 million to fund the
47
acquisitions of the assets of Legal and Business Publishers, including The Mecklenburg Times,
and the mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske and general working
capital needs. In March 2008, we converted $25.0 million of the revolving loans then-outstanding
under the credit facility to term loans. The term loans, including those issued as a result of this
conversion, have a maturity date of August 8, 2014. As of June 30, 2008, we had $72.2 million
outstanding under our term loan, and no amount outstanding under our revolving line of credit and
available capacity of approximately $125.0 million, after taking into account the senior leverage
ratio requirements under the credit agreement, existing at June 30, 2008.
In the third quarter of 2008, we amended our credit facility with the syndicate of lenders who
are party to our second amended restated credit facility. Specifically, on July 28, 2008, we and
our consolidated subsidiaries signed a first amendment to the credit facility, which approved the
acquisition of NDEx and waived the requirement that we use 50% of the proceeds from the private
placement to pay down indebtedness under the credit facility (both described in Recent
Developments). In addition, the amendment (1) reduces the senior leverage ratio we and our
consolidated subsidiaries are required to maintain as of the last day of each fiscal quarter from
no more than 4.50 to 1.00 to no more than 3.50 to 1.00 and (2) increases the interest rate margins
charged on the loans under the credit facility. While the amendment is effective as of July 28,
2008, if certain conditions subsequent are not satisfied by September 30, 2008, including, without
limitation, the closing of the NDEx acquisition and customary conditions, the amendments described
above will cease to have any force or effect and the credit facility will revert back to the
existing provisions (except that, we and our consolidated subsidiaries will not in any event be
required to use 50% of the proceeds from the private placement to pay down indebtedness under the
credit facility).
We expect to use approximately $105.0 million in debt to fund the acquisition of NDEx at
closing, which we expect to occur in the third quarter of 2008. After the funding of this
acquisition, we expect to have $177.0 million outstanding under our term loans, no amount
outstanding under our revolving line of credit and available capacity of approximately $20.0
million, after taking into account our senior leverage ratio requirements, as revised in July 2008.
We expect to use the remaining availability under our credit facility for working capital and other
general corporate purposes, including the financing of other acquisitions.
Our credit agreement permits us to elect whether outstanding amounts under the term loan
facility and the revolving credit facility accrue interest based on the prime rate or LIBOR as
determined in accordance with the second amended and restated credit agreement, in each case, plus
a margin that fluctuates on the basis of the ratio of our and our consolidated subsidiaries total
liabilities to pro forma EBITDA. Since amending our credit facility in July 2008, the margin on the
prime rate loans may fluctuate between 0% and 1.25% and the margin on the LIBOR loans may fluctuate
between 0% and 3.25%. At June 30, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on our senior term note
was 6.0%. If we elect to have interest accrue (1) based on the prime rate, then such interest is
due and payable on the last day of each month and (2) based on LIBOR, then such interest is due and
payable at the end of the applicable interest period that we elect, provided that if the applicable
interest period is longer than three months interest will be due and payable in three month
intervals.
Our obligations under the credit agreement are the joint and several liabilities of us and our
consolidated subsidiaries and are secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of such
entities, including pledges of equity interests in the consolidated subsidiaries.
Our credit agreement prohibits redemptions and provides that in the event we issue any
additional equity securities, 50% of the cash proceeds of the issuance must be paid to our lenders
in satisfaction of any outstanding indebtedness. As described above, our lenders have waived this
requirement in connection with the net proceeds raised from the private placement of our common
stock in July 2008. Our credit agreement also contains a number of negative covenants that limit us
from, among other things and with certain thresholds and exceptions:
|
|
|
incurring indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) or liens; |
|
|
|
|
entering into mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions; |
|
|
|
|
selling assets; |
|
|
|
|
entering into certain acquisition transactions; |
48
|
|
|
forming or entering into partnerships and joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
entering into negative pledge agreements; |
|
|
|
|
paying dividends, redeeming or repurchasing shares or making other payments in respect of
capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
entering into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
making investments; |
|
|
|
|
entering into sale and leaseback transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
changing our line of business. |
At June 30, 2008, our credit agreement also required that, as of the last day of any fiscal
quarter, we not permit our senior leverage ratio to be more than 4.50 to 1.00 and our fixed charge
coverage ratio to be less than 1.20 to 1.00. This senior leverage ratio represents, for any
particular date, the ratio of our outstanding indebtedness (less our subordinated debt and up to a
specified amount of our cash and cash equivalents) to our pro forma EBITDA, calculated in
accordance with our second amended and restated credit agreement, for the four fiscal quarters
ended on, or most recently ended before, the applicable date. As a result of the amendment
described above, for the third quarter 2008 and all future periods, our senior leverage ratio
cannot be more than 3.50 to 1.00. Our fixed charge coverage ratio, for any particular date, is
equal to the ratio of (1) our adjusted EBITDA, calculated in accordance with our second amended and
restated credit agreement (less income taxes paid in cash, net capital expenditures paid in cash,
and certain restricted payments paid in cash), to (2) interest expense plus principal payments on
account of the term loan facility and our interest bearing liabilities plus all payments made
pursuant to non-competition or consulting fees paid by us in connection with acquisitions, for the
four fiscal quarters ended on, or most recently ended before, the applicable date.
Future Needs
We expect that cash flow from operations, supplemented by short and long term financing and
the proceeds from our credit facility, as necessary, will be adequate to fund day-to-day operations
and capital expenditure requirements. We further expect that the proceeds of our private placement
and available borrowing under our credit facility, along with
available cash, will be adequate to fund the acquisition of NDEx.
We plan to continue to develop and evaluate potential acquisitions to expand our product and
service offerings and customer base and enter new geographic markets. We intend to fund these
acquisitions over the next twelve months with funds generated from operations and borrowings under
our credit facility. We may also need to raise money to fund these acquisitions, as we did for the
acquisition of NDEx, through the sales of our equity securities or additional debt financing. Our
ability to secure short-term and long-term financing in the future will depend on several factors,
including our future profitability, the quality of our short and long-term assets, our relative
levels of debt and equity, the financial condition and operations of acquisition targets (in the
case of acquisition financing) and the overall condition of the credit markets.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to interest rates. Other types of market risk, such as
foreign currency risk, do not arise in the normal course of our business activities. Our exposure
to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under our credit facility. However, as of
June 30, 2008, we had swap arrangements that convert the $40.0 million of our variable rate term
loan into a fixed rate obligation. Under our bank credit facility, we are required to enter into
derivative financial instrument transactions, such as swaps or interest rate caps, in order to
manage or reduce our exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. We do not enter into
derivatives or other financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS No. 133,
requires us to recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. As of June 30, 2008, our interest
rate swap agreements were not designated for hedge accounting treatment under
49
SFAS No. 133, and as a result, the fair value is classified within other assets on our balance
sheet and as a reduction of interest expense in our statement of operations for the year then
ended. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized an increase of $0.6 million
and $0.4 million, respectively, of net interest expense related to the decrease in fair value of
the interest rate swap agreements. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the estimated fair
value of our fixed interest rate swaps was a liability of $1.2 million, as compared to an asset of
$0.4 million at June 30, 2007.
If the future interest yield curve decreases, the fair value of the interest rate swap
agreements will decrease and interest expense will increase. If the future interest yield curve
increases, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements will increase and interest expense
will decrease.
Based on the variable-rate debt included in our debt portfolio, a 75 basis point increase in
interest rates would have resulted in additional interest expense of $110,000 (pre-tax) in the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
accurately and within the time frames specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules
and forms and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June
30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time involved in ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our normal
course of business, and we do not believe that any such existing litigation is material to our
financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors update and supersede the risk factors included in our annual report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2008 under the captions
Regulation of sub-prime, Alt-A and other non-traditional mortgage products, including voluntary
programs such as Project Lifeline, and the Hope Now Alliance, a consortium that develops
foreclosure relief program, may have an adverse affect on or restrict our operations and We
intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which we may not do successfully and may
subject us to considerable business and financial risk. Other than as set forth below, there have
been no material changes from the risk factors we previously disclosed in Risk Factors in Item 1A
of our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28,
2008 and in Risk Factors in Item 1A of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2008.
Regulation of sub-prime, Alt-A and other residential mortgage products, including bills introduced
in states where APC does business and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, and voluntary
foreclosure relief
50
programs developed by the Hope Now Alliance, a consortium that includes loan servicers, may have an
adverse effect on or restrict our operations.
The prevalence of sub-prime, Alt-A and other non-traditional mortgage products and the
increasing number of defaults and delinquencies in connection with those and other mortgages may
result in new or increased government regulation of residential mortgage products. If new or more
stringent regulations are enacted, the clients of APCs law firm customers would likely be subject
to these regulations and these new or more stringent regulations may adversely impact the number of
mortgage default files that our law firm customers receive from their clients and can then refer to
us for processing. For example, on March 4, 2008, a new bill was introduced in Michigan, which if
it passes, would place a one year moratorium on all foreclosures in Michigan. In Minnesota, another
state where APC does business, the Minnesota legislature is considering a bill that would allow
homeowners with sub-prime mortgages to reduce their monthly mortgage payments, deferring the
balance of the reduced payments for twelve months. In addition, on July 30, 2008, President Bush
signed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which provides, in part, reforms to mitigate
the volume of mortgages in foreclosure, including the development of a refinance program for
homeowners with sub-prime loans. This refinance program is expected
to take effect on October 1, 2008. If this
program is successful, it will likely reduce the number of mortgages going into default and, thus,
the number of mortgage default files that our law firm customers can refer to us for processing.
If this occurs, it will have a negative impact on our earnings and growth.
Furthermore, a number of loan servicers, including clients of our law firm customers, are
members of the Hope Now Alliance, a consortium of loan servicers, non-profit debt counselors and
investors that develops and implements programs to assist homeowners in preventing a foreclosure of
their mortgages. Project Lifeline is one such program. Under Project Lifeline, six loan servicers,
representing approximately 50% of all existing mortgages, are contacting certain delinquent
homeowners to evaluate whether to modify the terms of their loans and, if the foreclosure process
has already begun, with the opportunity to pause the foreclosure while the servicers evaluate
whether the loans terms may be modified. Five of the six loan servicers participating in Project
Lifeline accounted for 51.6% of the mortgage default files referred to us for processing from our
law firm customers in 2007. We cannot be certain whether Project Lifeline and programs like it will
be successful in preventing foreclosures and restructuring loans. If Project Lifeline and similar
programs are successful, we expect there will be fewer foreclosures and that the number of files
that our law firm customers can refer to us for processing will likely decrease, which would
negatively affect our revenues, growth and operations. In addition, mortgage companies and loan
servicers and others over whom we have no control may voluntarily restructure or reevaluate
existing loans or loan products, which could effect the number of loans in default and,
consequently, the number of files referred to us for mortgage default processing.
We intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which we may not do successfully and may
subject us to considerable business and financial risks.
We have grown, and anticipate that we will continue to grow, through opportunistic
acquisitions of business information and professional services businesses. While we evaluate
potential acquisitions on an ongoing basis, we may not be successful in assessing the value,
strengths and weaknesses of acquisition opportunities or consummating acquisitions on acceptable
terms. For example, to the extent that market studies performed by third parties, internal company
surveys and our own experience, all of which we rely upon but
have not independently verified, are not
accurate indicators of market and business trends, we may not appropriately evaluate or realize the
future market growth or business opportunities in targeted geographic areas and business lines that
we expect from an acquisition. Furthermore, we may not be successful in identifying acquisition
opportunities and suitable acquisition opportunities may not even be made available or known to us.
In addition, we may compete for certain acquisition targets with companies that have greater
financial resources than we do. Our ability to pursue acquisition opportunities may also be limited
by non-competition provisions to which we are subject. For example, our ability to carry public
notices in Michigan and to provide mortgage default processing services in Indiana and Minnesota is
limited by non-competition provisions to which we agreed when we purchased a 35.0% membership
interest in DLNP and the mortgage default processing service business of Feiwell & Hannoy and
Wilford & Geske. We anticipate financing future acquisitions through cash provided by operating
activities, borrowings under our bank credit facility and/or other debt or equity financing, which
would reduce our cash available for other purposes. For example, we will be required to incur
additional indebtedness to close the acquisition of NDEx and this additional debt will consume a
51
significant portion of our ability to borrow and may limit our ability to pursue other
acquisitions or growth strategies.
Acquisitions may expose us to particular business and financial risks that include, but are
not limited to:
|
|
|
diverting managements time, attention and resources from managing our business; |
|
|
|
|
incurring additional indebtedness and assuming liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
incurring significant additional capital expenditures and operating expenses to
improve, coordinate or integrate managerial, operational, financial and
administrative systems; |
|
|
|
|
experiencing an adverse impact on our earnings from non-recurring acquisition-related
charges or the write-off or amortization of acquired goodwill and other intangible assets; |
|
|
|
|
failing to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
|
facing operational difficulties in new markets or with new product or service offerings; and |
|
|
|
|
failing to retain key personnel and customers of the acquired businesses, including
subscribers and advertisers for acquired publications and clients of the law firm customers
served by acquired mortgage default processing businesses. |
We may not be able to successfully manage acquired businesses or increase our cash flow from
these operations. If we are unable to successfully implement our acquisition strategy or address
the risks associated with acquisitions, or if we encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties,
complications or delays frequently encountered in connection with the integration of acquired
entities and the expansion of operations, our growth and ability to compete may be impaired, we may
fail to achieve acquisition synergies and we may be required to focus resources on integration of
operations rather than other profitable areas. For example, if we are able to close the
acquisition of NDEx, it will result in APC (1) operating in three new states, which may place a
strain on our management and internal systems, processes and controls, and (2) providing mortgage
default processing services directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers in California and
operating a real estate title company, with which we have no or limited experience. Furthermore,
to the extent that our growth strategy for APC includes NDEx starting operations in new states to
service offices established by Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP or law firms or
lawyers affiliated with the Barrett law firm, as opposed to our historical focus of acquiring an
existing mortgage default processing business from a law firm that serves a particular state, we
will rely heavily on the ability of the Barrett law firm to successfully open offices or partner
with other law firms or lawyers in such other states and on the ability of Michael Barrett and
other members of NDExs senior management team to successfully execute this strategy. If we are
unable to successfully address the risks associated with this acquisition, or if we encounter
unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications or delays in integrating, operating or expanding
NDExs business, NDEx may not be accretive to our earnings per share and could negatively impact
our growth. In addition, we may not be able to close the acquisition of NDEx on a timely basis or
at all. Because we have announced the pending acquisition of NDEx, the trading price of our stock
may include the impact of this acquisition and any delay or
inability to close the acquisition could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
52
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On May 12, 2008, we held an annual meeting of stockholders, where the stockholders voted upon
the ratification of the audit committees appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm. This item received the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
21,362,916 |
|
Against |
|
|
3,583 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
136 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
The Boards proxy materials also solicited votes for David Michael Winton as a Class I
Director, with a term to expire at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders. This item was removed
from the agenda of the annual meeting because Mr. Winton died just prior to the meeting and our
nominating and corporate governance committee did not identify a qualified candidate to nominate
in Mr. Wintons place. James P. Dolan, John Bergstrom, Jacques Massicotte and George Rossi
continued as directors on our board following the annual meeting.
Item 5. Other Information
Since our annual meeting of stockholders on May 12, 2008, our board has elected Arthur F.
Kingsbury and Lauren Rich Fine to serve as Class I directors, both with terms expiring at the 2011
annual meeting of stockholders. The effective date of Mr. Kingsburys election as a director was
June 24, 2008 and the effective date of Ms. Rich Fines election as a director was July 25, 2008.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
2.1*
|
|
Equity Purchase Agreement among the
Company, APC and the Sellers named therein
dated July 28, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of our
current report on
Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on July 28,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement among the
Company and the Purchasers named therein
dated July 28, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our
current report on
Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on July 28,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement with the Company,
its consolidated subsidiaries and a
syndicate of lenders dated July 28, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our
current report on
Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on July 28,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Scott J. Pollei
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Scott J. Pollei
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
* |
|
The schedules to the Equity Purchase Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the SEC, upon request, a copy of the omitted
schedules. |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOLAN MEDIA COMPANY |
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ James P. Dolan
|
|
|
|
|
James P. Dolan
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Scott J. Pollei
|
|
|
|
|
Scott J. Pollei
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
|
|
|
Vicki J. Duncomb
Vice President, Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
54
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Scott J. Pollei
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Scott J. Pollei
|
|
Furnished herewith |
55