Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| |
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 |
Commission file number 1-812
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
DELAWARE | 06-0570975 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
10 Farm Springs Road, Farmington, Connecticut | 06032 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (860) 728-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock ($1 par value) | | New York Stock Exchange |
(CUSIP 913017 10 9) | | |
1.250% Notes due 2023 | | New York Stock Exchange |
(CUSIP U91301 AD0) | | |
1.125% Notes due 2021 | | New York Stock Exchange |
(CUSIP 913017 CD9) | | |
1.875% Notes due 2026 | | New York Stock Exchange |
(CUSIP 913017 CE7) | | |
Floating Rate Notes due 2018 | | New York Stock Exchange |
(CUSIP 913017 CC1) | | |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§232.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer | ý | | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2016 was approximately $85,789,321,218, based on the New York Stock Exchange closing price for such shares on that date. For purposes of this calculation, the Registrant has assumed that its directors and executive officers are affiliates.
At January 31, 2017, there were 805,861,740 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts I, II and IV hereof incorporate by reference portions of the United Technologies Corporation 2016 Annual Report to Shareowners. Part III hereof incorporates by reference portions of the United Technologies Corporation Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Annual Report
on Form 10-K for
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
| |
| Page |
| |
PART I | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART II | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART III | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART IV | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Annual Report on Form 10-K for
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Whenever reference is made in this Form 10-K to specific sections of United Technologies Corporation’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareowners (2016 Annual Report), those sections are incorporated herein by reference and are included in Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K. United Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries’ names, abbreviations thereof, logos, and product and service designators are all either the registered or unregistered trademarks or tradenames of United Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries. Names, abbreviations of names, logos, and product and service designators of other companies are either the registered or unregistered trademarks or tradenames of their respective owners. As used herein, the terms "we," "us," "our," "the Company," or "UTC," unless the context otherwise requires, mean United Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries. References to internet web sites in this Form 10-K are provided for convenience only. Information available through these web sites is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
PART I
General
United Technologies Corporation was incorporated in Delaware in 1934. UTC provides high technology products and services to the building systems and aerospace industries worldwide. Growth is attributable primarily to the internal development of our existing businesses and to acquisitions. The following description of our business should be read in conjunction with "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2016 Annual Report, including the information contained therein under the heading "Business Overview."
Our operations for the periods presented herein are classified into four segments: Otis, UTC Climate, Controls & Security, Pratt & Whitney, and UTC Aerospace Systems, with each segment comprised of groups of similar operating companies. References to each segment include the various operating companies established worldwide through which the operations for each segment are conducted.
Otis and UTC Climate, Controls & Security (collectively, referred to as the "commercial businesses") serve customers in the commercial, government, infrastructure and residential property sectors and transport and refrigeration businesses worldwide. Pratt & Whitney and UTC Aerospace Systems (collectively referred to as the "aerospace businesses") primarily serve commercial and government customers in both the original equipment and aftermarket parts and services markets of the aerospace industry. For 2016, our commercial and industrial sales (generated principally by the commercial businesses) were approximately 50 percent of our consolidated sales, and our commercial aerospace sales and military aerospace sales (generated exclusively by our aerospace businesses) were approximately 38 percent and 12 percent, respectively, of our consolidated sales. International sales for 2016, including U.S. export sales, were 61 percent of our total segment sales.
This Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the Investor Relations section of our Internet website (http://www.utc.com) under the heading "SEC Filings" as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our SEC filings are also available for reading and copying at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) containing reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Description of Business by Segment
Each segment's business, including its principal products and services and other material developments and information, is described below. Segment financial data for the years 2014 through 2016, including financial information about foreign and domestic operations and export sales, appears in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report. Segment sales as discussed below include intercompany sales, which are ultimately eliminated within the "Eliminations and other" category as reflected in the segment financial data in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016
Annual Report. Similarly, total segment backlog as discussed below includes intercompany backlog, as well as fully-funded government orders.
Otis
Otis is the world’s largest elevator and escalator manufacturing, installation and service company. Otis designs, manufactures, sells and installs passenger and freight elevators for low-, medium- and high-speed applications, as well as a broad line of escalators and moving walkways. In addition to new equipment, Otis provides modernization products to upgrade elevators and escalators as well as maintenance and repair services for both its products and those of other manufacturers. Otis serves customers in the commercial and residential property industries around the world. Otis sells directly to the end customer and through sales representatives and distributors.
Sales generated by Otis’ international operations were 75 percent and 77 percent of total Otis segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, Otis’ backlog was $14.9 billion as compared to $15.0 billion at December 31, 2015. Of the total Otis backlog at December 31, 2016, approximately $7.9 billion is expected to be realized as sales in 2017.
UTC Climate, Controls & Security
UTC Climate, Controls & Security is a leading provider of heating, ventilating, air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration solutions, including controls for residential, commercial, industrial and transportation applications. These products and services are sold under the Carrier name and other brand names to building contractors and owners, homeowners, transportation companies, retail stores and food service companies. UTC Climate, Controls & Security is also a global provider of security and fire safety products and services. UTC Climate, Controls & Security provides electronic security products, such as intruder alarms, access control systems and video surveillance systems, and designs and manufactures a wide range of fire safety products, including specialty hazard detection and fixed suppression products, portable fire extinguishers, and fire detection and life safety systems. Services provided to the electronic security and fire safety industries include design, installation, system integration, repair, maintenance, monitoring and inspection services. In certain markets, UTC Climate, Controls & Security also provides monitoring and response services, to complement its electronic security and fire safety businesses.
UTC Climate, Controls & Security sells directly to end customers and through joint ventures, manufacturer's representatives, distributors, wholesalers, dealers and retail outlets. Through its venture with Watsco, Inc., UTC Climate, Controls & Security distributes Carrier, Bryant, Payne and Totaline residential and light commercial HVAC products in certain parts of the U.S., Canada and certain territories in the Caribbean and Latin America. Certain UTC Climate, Controls & Security HVAC businesses are seasonal and sales and service activity can be impacted by weather. UTC Climate, Controls & Security customarily offers its customers incentives to purchase products to ensure an adequate supply of its products in the distribution channels. The principal incentive program provides reimbursements to distributors for offering promotional pricing on UTC Climate, Controls & Security products. UTC Climate, Controls & Security products and services are used by governments, financial institutions, architects, building owners and developers, security and fire consultants, homeowners and other end-users requiring a high level of security and fire protection for their businesses and residences. UTC Climate, Controls & Security provides its security and fire safety products and services under Chubb, Kidde and other brand names and sells directly to customers as well as through manufacturer's representatives, distributors, dealers and U.S. retail distribution.
Sales generated by UTC Climate, Controls & Security’s international operations, including U.S. export sales, were 55 percent and 56 percent of total UTC Climate, Controls & Security segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, UTC Climate, Controls & Security’s backlog was $3.2 billion as compared to $3.1 billion at December 31, 2015. Substantially all of the backlog at December 31, 2016 is expected to be realized as sales in 2017.
Pratt & Whitney
Pratt & Whitney is among the world’s leading suppliers of aircraft engines for the commercial, military, business jet and general aviation markets. Pratt & Whitney also provides fleet management services and aftermarket maintenance, repair and overhaul services, including the sale of spare parts and auxiliary power units. Pratt & Whitney produces and develops families of large engines for wide- and narrow-body and large regional aircraft in the commercial market and for fighter, bomber, tanker and transport aircraft in the military market. Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) is a world leader in the production of engines powering general and business aviation, as well as regional airline, utility and military, airplanes and helicopters.
In view of the risks and costs associated with developing new engines, Pratt & Whitney has entered into collaboration arrangements in which sales, costs and risks are shared with third parties. At December 31, 2016, the interests of third party participants in Pratt & Whitney-directed commercial jet engine programs ranged from approximately 14 percent to 50 percent. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report for a description of our accounting for
collaborative arrangements. In addition, Pratt & Whitney has interests in other engine programs, including a 50 percent ownership interest in the Engine Alliance (EA), a joint venture with GE Aviation, which markets and manufactures the GP7000 engine for the Airbus A380 aircraft. Pratt & Whitney has entered into risk and revenue sharing arrangements with third parties for 40 percent of the products and services that Pratt & Whitney is responsible for providing to the EA. Pratt & Whitney accounts for its interests in the EA joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Pratt & Whitney continues to pursue additional collaboration partners.
Pratt & Whitney holds a net 61 percent program share interest in the IAE International Aero Engines AG (IAE) collaboration with MTU Aero Engines AG (MTU) and Japanese Aero Engines Corporation (JAEC). As previously reported in June 2012, Rolls-Royce sold its collaboration interest in IAE to Pratt & Whitney, while also entering into an agreement to license its V2500 intellectual property to Pratt & Whitney. Rolls-Royce continues to support the program as a strategic supplier for the V2500 engine and continues to manufacture parts and assemble engines. Pratt & Whitney also holds a 59 percent program share interest in the International Aero Engines, LLC (IAE LLC) collaboration with MTU and JAEC. IAE LLC sells the PW1100G-JM engine for the Airbus A320neo aircraft and the PW1400G-JM engine for the Irkut MC21 aircraft.
Pratt & Whitney is under contract with the U.S. Government's F-35 Joint Program Office to produce, and sustain the F135 engine, a derivative of Pratt & Whitney’s F119 engine, to power the single-engine F-35 Lightning II aircraft (commonly known as the Joint Strike Fighter) being produced by Lockheed Martin. The two F135 propulsion system configurations for the F-35A/F-35C and F-35B jets are certified for production and in use by the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Marine Corps. F135 engines are also used on F-35 aircraft purchased by Joint Strike Fighter partner countries and foreign military sales countries.
In addition, Pratt & Whitney has developed the PurePower® PW1000G Geared TurboFan engine which entered into service in January 2016 and is intended to enable it to power both currently-proposed and future aircraft. The PurePower® PW1000G engine has demonstrated a significant reduction in fuel burn and noise levels with lower environmental emissions and operating costs than current production engines. Airbus has selected the PW1100G-JM engine, a member of the PurePower® PW1000G engine family, as a new engine option to power its A320neo family of aircraft, which entered into service in January 2016. The PW1100G-JM is being produced and sold as part of a collaboration with MTU and JAEC. Additionally, PurePower® PW1000G engine models have been selected by Bombardier to power the new CSeries passenger aircraft, Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation to power the new Mitsubishi Regional Jet, Irkut Corporation to power the new Irkut MC-21 passenger aircraft and Embraer to power the next generation of Embraer’s E-Jet family of aircraft. In October 2014, Gulfstream announced the selection of the PurePower® PW 800 engine to exclusively power Gulfstream’s new G500 and G600 business jets scheduled to enter service in 2018. The CSeries (CS100) aircraft, designed to carry 100 to 133 passengers, was certified in December 2015. The larger CSeries (CS300) aircraft, designed to carry up to 160 passengers, was certified in July 2016. The Irkut MC-21 and Embraer’s next generation of E-Jet family aircraft are scheduled to enter service in 2018. The Mitsubishi Regional Jet is scheduled to enter service in 2020. The success of these aircraft and the PurePower® family of engines is dependent upon many factors including technological accomplishments, program execution, aircraft demand, and regulatory approval. Based on these factors, as well as the level of success of aircraft program launches by aircraft manufacturers and other conditions, additional investment in the PurePower® program may be required. P&WC has developed and certified the PW210 engine family for helicopters manufactured by Sikorsky and Leonardo Helicopters. Pratt & Whitney continues to enhance its programs through performance improvement measures and product base expansion.
Pratt & Whitney’s products are sold principally to aircraft manufacturers, airlines and other aircraft operators, aircraft leasing companies and the U.S. and foreign governments. Pratt & Whitney’s products and services must adhere to strict regulatory and market-driven safety and performance standards. The frequently changing nature of these standards, along with the long duration of aircraft engine development, production and support programs, creates uncertainty regarding engine program profitability. Sales to Airbus (Pratt & Whitney’s largest customer by sales) were 34 percent and 39 percent of total Pratt & Whitney segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively, before taking into account discounts or financial incentives offered to customers. Sales to the U.S. Government were 21 percent of total Pratt & Whitney segment sales in both 2016 and 2015.
Sales generated by Pratt & Whitney’s international operations, including U.S. export sales, were 63 percent and 60 percent of total Pratt & Whitney segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, Pratt & Whitney’s backlog was $61.8 billion, including $6.4 billion of U.S. Government-funded contracts and subcontracts. At December 31, 2015, these amounts were $52.5 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively. Of the total Pratt & Whitney backlog at December 31, 2016, approximately $10.5 billion is expected to be realized as sales in 2017. Pratt & Whitney’s backlog includes certain contracts for which actual costs may ultimately exceed total sales. Pratt & Whitney’s backlog excludes orders for new commercial engines that have not yet received aviation authority engine certification. The PurePower® PW1100G-JM engine completed Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) certification for the Airbus A320neo platform on December 19, 2014 and entered into service in January 2016. The CSeries (CS100) aircraft was certified in December 2015, and the larger CSeries (CS300)
aircraft was certified in July 2016. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report for a description of our accounting for long-term contracts.
UTC Aerospace Systems
UTC Aerospace Systems is a leading global provider of technologically advanced aerospace products and aftermarket service solutions for aircraft manufacturers, airlines, regional, business and general aviation markets, military, space and undersea operations. UTC Aerospace Systems’ product portfolio includes electric power generation, power management and distribution systems, air data and aircraft sensing systems, engine control systems, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems, engine components, environmental control systems, fire and ice detection and protection systems, propeller systems, engine nacelle systems, including thrust reversers and mounting pylons, interior and exterior aircraft lighting, aircraft seating and cargo systems, actuation systems, landing systems, including landing gear, wheels and brakes, and space products and subsystems. Aftermarket services include spare parts, overhaul and repair, engineering and technical support and fleet management solutions. UTC Aerospace Systems sells aerospace products to aircraft manufacturers, airlines and other aircraft operators, the U.S. and foreign governments, maintenance, repair and overhaul providers, and independent distributors. UTC Aerospace Systems’ largest customers are Boeing and Airbus with a combined 34 percent and 31 percent of total UTC Aerospace Systems segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sales to the U.S. Government were 17 percent and 19 percent of total UTC Aerospace Systems segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In 2016, UTC Aerospace Systems' products supported first flights of the Boeing 737MAX, Embraer E190-E2, Global 7000, Airbus A350-1000, and Gulfstream G600. In addition, UTC Aerospace Systems' products supported the certification of the Bombardier CSeries (CS300), the Dassault Falcon 8X as well as the Initial Operational Capability (IOC) of the F-35.
Significant product development activity continues, including major systems for the Embraer E2, the Airbus A350-1000, the Boeing 777X and 787-10, the COMAC C919, the Mitsubishi Regional Jet, the Bombardier Global 7000 aircraft and the Irkut MC21 aircraft. UTC Aerospace Systems is also the operations support prime contractor for NASA’s space suit/life support system and produces environmental monitoring and control, life support, power management and distribution, and thermal control systems for the International Space Station and the Orion crew exploration vehicle.
Sales generated by UTC Aerospace Systems’ international operations, including U.S. export sales, were 56 percent and 54 percent of total UTC Aerospace Systems segment sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, UTC Aerospace Systems’ backlog was $13.4 billion, including $2.4 billion of U.S. Government-funded contracts and subcontracts. At December 31, 2015, these amounts were $13.2 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. The 2015 amounts have been revised to reflect the total projected revenues under the term of existing long-term aftermarket contracts. Of the total UTC Aerospace Systems backlog at December 31, 2016, approximately $7.3 billion is expected to be realized as sales in 2017.
Other Matters Relating to Our Business as a Whole
Competition and Other Factors Affecting Our Businesses
As worldwide businesses, our operations can be affected by a variety of economic, industry and other factors, including those described in this section, in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in our 2016 Annual Report, in Item 1, "Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results," and in Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K. Each business unit is subject to significant competition from a large number of companies in the U.S. and other countries, and each competes on the basis of price, delivery schedule, product performance and service.
Our aerospace businesses are subject to substantial competition from domestic manufacturers, foreign manufacturers (whose governments sometimes provide research and development assistance, marketing subsidies and other assistance for certain of their commercial products beyond the assistance that may be available in the U.S.) and companies that obtain regulatory agency approval to manufacture spare parts. In particular, Pratt & Whitney experiences intense competition for new commercial airframe/engine combinations. Engine suppliers may offer substantial discounts and other financial incentives, performance and operating cost guarantees, and participation in financing arrangements, in an effort to compete for the aftermarket associated with these engines. For information regarding customer financing commitments, participation in guarantees of customer financing arrangements and performance and operating cost guarantees, primarily related to Pratt & Whitney, see Notes 5 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report. Customer selections of engines and components can also have a significant impact on later sales of parts and services. In addition, the U.S. Government’s and other governments’ policies of purchasing parts from suppliers other than the original equipment manufacturer affect military spare parts sales. Significant elements of our aerospace businesses, such as spare parts sales for engines and aircraft in service, have short lead times. Therefore, backlog information may not be indicative of future demand. Pratt & Whitney’s major competitors in the sale of engines are GE Aviation, Honeywell, Turbomeca, and CFM International.
Research and Development
Because changes in technology can have a significant impact on our operations and competitive position, we spend substantial amounts of our own funds on research and development. These expenditures, which are charged to expense as incurred, were $2.3 billion or 4.1 percent of total sales in 2016 and 2015, and $2.5 billion or 4.3 percent of total sales in 2014. We also perform research and development work under contracts funded by the U.S. Government and other customers. Costs incurred under this contract research and development, which is performed in our aerospace businesses, amounted to $1.4 billion in 2016, as compared to $1.5 billion in 2015 and $2.0 billion in 2014. These contract research and development costs include amounts that are expensed as incurred, through cost of products sold, and amounts that are capitalized into inventory to be subsequently recovered through production shipments. Total contract research and development costs of $1.4 billion, $1.6 billion and $2.0 billion were expensed through cost of products sold in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
U.S. Government Contracts
Contracting with the U.S. Government entails certain unique risks. U.S. Government contracts are subject to termination by the government, either for the convenience of the government or for default in the event of our failure to perform under the applicable contract. In the case of a termination for convenience, we would normally be entitled to reimbursement for our allowable costs incurred, plus termination costs and a reasonable profit. If terminated by the government as a result of our default, we could be liable for additional costs the government incurs in acquiring undelivered goods or services from another source and any other damages it suffers. Most of our U.S. Government sales are made under fixed-price type contracts, while approximately $1.6 billion or 3 percent of our total sales for 2016 were made under cost-reimbursement type contracts.
Our contracts with the U.S. Government are also subject to audits. Like many defense contractors, we have received audit reports, which recommend that certain contract prices should be reduced, or that certain payments should be delayed or withheld, to comply with various government regulations, including reports alleging that cost or pricing data we submitted in negotiation of the contract prices or cost accounting practices may not have conformed to government regulations. Some of these audit reports involved substantial amounts. We have made voluntary refunds in those cases we believe appropriate, have settled some allegations and, in some cases, continue to negotiate with the government and/or litigate. For further discussion of risks related to government contracting, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," in this Form 10-K and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report.
Compliance with Environmental and Other Government Regulations
Our operations are subject to and affected by environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the U.S. and regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over our foreign operations. We have incurred and will likely continue to incur liabilities under various government statutes for the cleanup of pollutants previously released into the environment. We do not anticipate that compliance with current provisions relating to the protection of the environment or that any payments we may be required to make for cleanup liabilities will have a material adverse effect upon our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations. Environmental matters are further addressed in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Notes 1 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report.
Most of the U.S. laws governing environmental matters include criminal provisions. If we were convicted of a violation of the federal Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act, the facility or facilities involved in the violation would be ineligible to be used in performing any U.S. Government contract we are awarded until the Environmental Protection Agency thereafter certifies that the condition giving rise to the violation had been corrected.
In addition, we could be affected by future laws or regulations imposed in response to concerns over climate change. Changes in climate change concerns, or in the regulation of such concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, could subject us to additional costs and restrictions, including compliance costs and increased energy and raw materials costs.
We conduct our businesses through subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. Changes in legislation or government policies can affect our worldwide operations. For example, governmental regulation of refrigerants and energy efficiency standards and fire safety regulations are important to our UTC Climate, Controls & Security businesses, and elevator safety codes are important to the businesses of Otis, while government safety and performance regulations, restrictions on aircraft engine noise and emissions and government procurement practices can impact our aerospace businesses.
U.S. laws, regulations, orders, and other measures concerning the export or re-export of products, software, services and technology to, and other trade-related activities involving, non-U.S. countries and parties affect the operations of UTC and its affiliates.
For further discussion of risks related to environmental matters and other government regulations, see Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," in this Form 10-K and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report.
Intellectual Property and Raw Materials and Supplies
We maintain a portfolio of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licenses and franchises related to our businesses. While we believe we have taken reasonable measures to protect this portfolio, our efforts may not be sufficient. See Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K for further discussion of intellectual property matters.
We believe we have adequate sources for our purchases of materials, components, services and supplies used in our manufacturing. We work continuously with our supply base to ensure an adequate source of supply and to reduce costs. We pursue cost reductions through a number of mechanisms, including consolidating our purchases, reducing the number of suppliers, strategic global sourcing and using bidding competitions among potential suppliers. In some instances, we depend upon a single source of supply or participate in commodity markets that may be subject to allocations of limited supplies by suppliers. Like other users in the U.S., we are largely dependent upon foreign sources for certain raw materials requirements, such as cobalt, tantalum, chromium, rhenium and nickel. We have a number of ongoing programs to manage this dependence and the accompanying risk, including long-term agreements and the conservation of materials through scrap reclamation and new manufacturing processes. We believe that our supply management practices are based on an appropriate balancing of the foreseeable risks and the costs of alternative practices. Although at times high prices for some raw materials important to our businesses (for example, steel, copper, aluminum, titanium and nickel) have caused margin and cost pressures, we do not foresee near term unavailability of materials, components or supplies that would have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. For further discussion of the possible effects of the cost and availability of raw materials on our business, see Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K.
Employees and Employee Relations
At December 31, 2016, our total number of employees was approximately 202,000, of which approximately 68 percent represents employees based outside the U.S. During 2016, we negotiated or concluded eight domestic collective bargaining agreements, the largest of which covered certain workers at Pratt & Whitney’s facilities in East Hartford and Middletown, Connecticut. In 2017, numerous collective bargaining agreements are subject to renegotiation, the largest of which covers certain workers at Otis across the U.S. Although some previous contract renegotiations have had a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations, we do not anticipate that the renegotiation of these contracts in 2017 will have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. For discussion of the effects of our restructuring actions on employment, see Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K and under "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report.
For a discussion of other matters which may affect our competitive position, cash flows, financial condition or results of operations, including the risks of our international operations, see the further discussion under the headings "General" and "Description of Business by Segment" in this section, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-K, and under "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2016 Annual Report.
Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results
This Form 10-K contains statements which, to the extent they are not statements of historical or present fact, constitute "forward-looking statements" under the securities laws. From time to time, oral or written forward-looking statements may also be included in other information released to the public. These forward-looking statements are intended to provide management’s current expectations or plans for our future operating and financial performance, based on assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "believe," "expect," "expectations," "plans," "strategy," "prospects," "estimate," "project," "target," "anticipate," "will," "should," "see," "guidance," "confident" and other words of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. Forward-looking statements may include, among other things, statements relating to future sales, earnings, cash flow, results of operations, uses of cash, share repurchases and other measures of financial performance or potential future plans, strategies or transactions. All forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation:
| |
• | the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; |
| |
• | challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; |
| |
• | future levels of indebtedness and capital spending and research and development spending; |
| |
• | future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; |
| |
• | the timing and scope of future repurchases of our common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash; |
| |
• | delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; |
| |
• | company and customer-directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; |
| |
• | the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture activity, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into our existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; |
| |
• | new business opportunities; |
| |
• | our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; |
| |
• | the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; |
| |
• | the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; |
| |
• | pension plan assumptions and future contributions; |
| |
• | the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; |
| |
• | the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; and |
| |
• | the effect of changes in tax, environmental, regulatory (including among other things import/export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. |
In addition, this Form 10-K includes important information as to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. See the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" under the heading "Note 18: Contingent Liabilities," the section titled "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the headings "Business Overview," "Results of Operations," "Liquidity and Financial Condition," and "Critical Accounting Estimates," and the section titled "Risk Factors." This Form 10-K also includes important information as to these factors in the "Business" section under the headings "General," "Description of Business by Segment" and "Other Matters Relating to Our Business as a Whole," and in the "Legal Proceedings" section. Additional important information as to these factors is included in our 2016 Annual Report in the section titled "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the headings "Restructuring Costs," "Environmental Matters" and "Governmental Matters." The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Additional information as to factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements is disclosed from time to time in our other filings with the SEC.
Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by the factors set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results.
Our Global Growth May be Affected by Global Economic, Capital Market and Political Conditions.
Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows may be adversely affected by changes in global economic conditions and geopolitical risks, including credit market conditions, levels of consumer and business confidence, commodity prices, exchange rates, levels of government spending and deficits, trade policies, political conditions, actual or anticipated default on sovereign debt and other challenges that could affect the global economy. These economic conditions affect businesses such as ours in a number of ways. Tightening of credit in financial markets could adversely affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant purchases and operations and could result in a decrease in or cancellation of orders for our products and services as well as impact the ability of our customers to make payments. Similarly, such tightening of credit may adversely affect our supplier base and increase the potential for one or more of our suppliers to experience financial distress or bankruptcy. Our global business is also adversely affected by decreases in the general level of economic activity, such as decreases in business and consumer spending, air travel, construction activity, the financial strength of airlines and business jet operators, and government procurement.
Our Financial Performance Is Dependent on the Conditions of the Construction and Aerospace Industries.
The results of our commercial and industrial businesses, which generated approximately 50 percent of our consolidated sales in 2016, are influenced by a number of external factors including fluctuations in residential and commercial construction activity, regulatory changes, interest rates, labor costs, foreign currency exchange rates, customer attrition, raw material and energy costs, global credit market conditions, and other global and political factors. For example, a slowdown in building and remodeling activity can adversely affect the financial performance of Otis and UTC Climate, Controls & Security. In addition, the financial performance of UTC Climate, Controls & Security can also be influenced by production and utilization of transport equipment and, particularly in its residential business, weather conditions.
The results of our commercial and military aerospace businesses, which generated approximately 50 percent of our consolidated sales in 2016, are directly tied to the economic conditions in the commercial aviation and defense industries, which are cyclical in nature. Capital spending and demand for aircraft engines, aerospace products and component aftermarket parts and service by commercial airlines, aircraft operators and aircraft manufacturers are influenced by a wide variety of factors, including current and predicted traffic levels, load factors, aircraft fuel pricing, labor issues, worldwide airline profits, airline consolidation, bankruptcies, competition, the retirement of older aircraft, regulatory changes, terrorism and related safety concerns, general economic conditions, corporate profitability, cost reduction efforts and backlog levels. Any of these conditions could reduce the sales and margins of our aerospace businesses. Other factors, including future terrorist actions, pandemic health issues or major natural disasters, could also dramatically reduce the demand for air travel, which could negatively impact the sales and margins of our aerospace businesses. Additionally, because a substantial portion of the backlog for commercial aerospace customers is scheduled for delivery beyond 2017, changes in economic conditions may cause customers to request that firm orders be rescheduled or canceled. At times, our aerospace businesses also enter into firm fixed-price development contracts, which may require us to bear cost overruns related to unforeseen technical and design challenges that arise during the development and early production stages of the program. In addition, our aerospace businesses face intense competition from domestic and foreign manufacturers of new equipment and spare parts. Spare parts sales and aftermarket
service trends are affected by similar factors, including usage, pricing, technological improvements, regulatory changes and the retirement of older aircraft. Furthermore, because of the lengthy research and development cycle involved in bringing products in these business segments to market, we cannot predict the economic conditions that will exist when any new product is complete. A reduction in capital spending in the commercial aviation or defense industries could have a significant effect on the demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. The defense industry is also affected by a changing U.S. and global political environment, continued pressure on U.S. and global defense spending and U.S. foreign policy and the level of activity in military flight operations. U.S. Government deficit reduction measures, Congressional and executive branch disputes over budgets and debt ceilings and the impact of sequestration have increased market uncertainty and adversely affected our military businesses. Should these factors continue and overall U.S. Government defense spending decline, it could result in significant reductions to revenue, cash flow, profit and backlog for our military businesses. One or more of the programs that we currently support or are currently pursuing could be phased-out, limited or terminated. Reductions in these existing programs, unless offset by other programs and opportunities, could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.
Our International Operations Subject Us to Economic Risk As Our Results of Operations May Be Adversely Affected by Changes in Foreign Currency Fluctuations, Economic Conditions and Changes in Local Government Regulation.
We conduct our business on a global basis, with approximately 61 percent of our 2016 total segment sales derived from international operations, including U.S. export sales. Changes in local and regional economic conditions, including fluctuations in exchange rates, may affect product demand and reported profits in our non-U.S. operations (especially the commercial businesses and P&W Canada), where transactions are generally denominated in local currencies. In addition, currency fluctuations may affect the prices we pay suppliers for materials used in our products. As a result, our operating margins also may be negatively impacted by worldwide currency fluctuations that result in higher costs for certain cross border transactions. Our financial statements are denominated in U.S. Dollars. Accordingly, fluctuations in exchange rates may also give rise to translation gains or losses when financial statements of non-U.S. operating units are translated into U.S. Dollars. Given that the majority of our sales are non-U.S. based, a strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against other major foreign currencies could adversely affect our results of operations.
The majority of sales in the aerospace businesses are transacted in U.S. Dollars, consistent with established industry practice, while the majority of costs at locations outside the U.S. are incurred in the applicable local currency (principally the Euro, the Canadian Dollar, and the Polish Zloty). For operating units with U.S. Dollar sales and local currency costs, there is foreign currency exposure that could impact our results of operations depending on market changes in the exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar against the applicable foreign currencies. To manage certain exposures, we employ long-term hedging strategies associated with U.S. Dollar sales. See Notes 1 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report for further discussion of our hedging strategies.
Our international sales and operations are subject to risks associated with changes in local government laws, regulations and policies, including those related to tariffs and trade barriers, investments, taxation, exchange controls, capital controls, employment regulations, and repatriation of earnings. Government policies on international trade and investments such as import quotas, capital controls, punitive taxes or tariffs, whether adopted by individual governments or addressed by regional trade blocs, can affect demand for our products and services, impact the competitive position of our products or prevent us from being able to manufacture or sell products in certain countries. The implementation of more restrictive trade policies or the renegotiation of existing trade agreements in the U.S. or countries where we sell large quantities of products and services or procure supplies and other materials incorporated into our products could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, a government's adoption of "buy national" policies or retaliation by another government against such policies could have a negative impact on our results of operations. Our international sales and operations are also sensitive to changes in foreign national priorities, including government budgets, as well as to political and economic instability. International transactions may involve increased financial and legal risks due to differing legal systems and customs in foreign countries. For example, as a condition of sale or award of a contract, some international customers require us to agree to offset arrangements, which may include in-country purchases, manufacturing and financial support arrangements. The contract may provide for penalties in the event we fail to perform in accordance with the offset requirements.
In addition, as part of our globalization strategy, we have invested in certain countries, including Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa and countries in the Middle East, that carry high levels of currency, political, compliance and economic risk. We expect that sales to emerging markets will continue to account for a significant portion of our sales as our businesses evolve and as these and other developing nations and regions around the world increase their demand for our products. Emerging market operations can present many risks, including cultural differences (such as employment and business practices), volatility in gross domestic product, economic and government instability, and the imposition of exchange controls and capital controls. While these factors and their impact are difficult to predict, any one or
more of them could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We Use a Variety of Raw Materials, Supplier-Provided Parts, Components, Sub-Systems and Contract Manufacturing Services in Our Businesses, and Significant Shortages, Supplier Capacity Constraints, Supplier Production Disruptions or Price Increases Could Increase Our Operating Costs and Adversely Impact the Competitive Positions of Our Products.
Our reliance on suppliers (including third party contract manufacturing and logistics) and commodity markets to secure raw materials, parts, components and sub-systems used in our products exposes us to volatility in the prices and availability of these materials. In many instances, we depend upon a single source of supply, manufacturing, logistics support or assembly or participate in commodity markets that may be subject to allocations of limited supplies by suppliers. A disruption in deliveries from our suppliers, supplier capacity constraints, supplier production disruptions, supplier quality issues, closing or bankruptcy of our suppliers, price increases, or decreased availability of raw materials or commodities, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our commitments to customers or increase our operating costs. We believe that our supply management and production practices are based on an appropriate balancing of the foreseeable risks and the costs of alternative practices. Nonetheless, price increases, supplier capacity constraints, supplier production disruptions or the unavailability of some raw materials may have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We Engage in Acquisitions and Divestitures, and May Encounter Difficulties Integrating Acquired Businesses with, or Disposing of Divested Businesses From, Our Current Operations; Therefore, We May Not Realize the Anticipated Benefits of these Acquisitions and Divestitures.
We seek to grow through strategic acquisitions in addition to internal growth. In the past several years, we have made various acquisitions and have entered into joint venture arrangements intended to complement and expand our businesses, and expect to continue to do so in the future. Our due diligence reviews may not identify all of the material issues necessary to accurately estimate the cost and potential loss contingencies of a particular transaction, including potential exposure to regulatory sanctions resulting from an acquisition target’s previous activities. For example, we may incur unanticipated costs, expenses or other liabilities as a result of an acquisition target’s violation of applicable laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or other anti-bribery and corruption laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions. We may incur unanticipated costs or expenses, including post-closing asset impairment charges, expenses associated with eliminating duplicate facilities, litigation, and other liabilities. We also may encounter difficulties in integrating acquisitions with our operations, applying our internal controls processes to these acquisitions, or in managing strategic investments. Additionally, we may not realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter into a transaction. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, accounting requirements relating to business combinations, including the requirement to expense certain acquisition costs as incurred, may cause us to incur greater earnings volatility and generally lower earnings during periods in which we acquire new businesses. Furthermore, we make strategic divestitures from time to time. Our divestitures may result in continued financial exposure to the divested businesses, such as through guarantees or other financial arrangements or continued supply and services arrangements, following the transaction. Under these arrangements, nonperformance by those divested businesses could result in obligations being imposed on us that could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, cash flows, results of operations, or financial condition. The success of future acquisitions and divestitures will depend on the satisfaction of conditions precedent to, and consummation of, the pending transactions, the timing of consummation of these pending transactions, and the ability of the parties to secure any required regulatory approvals in a timely manner, among other things.
Our Debt Levels and Related Debt Service Obligations Could Have Negative Consequences; Our Ability to Access Debt May Be Affected by Changes in Global Capital Markets, Our Financial Performance or Outlook or Our Credit Ratings.
We have outstanding debt and other financial obligations and significant unused borrowing capacity. Our debt level and related debt service obligations could have negative consequences, including, among others:
| |
• | requiring us to dedicate significant cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our debt, which would reduce funds we have available for other purposes, such as acquisitions, reinvestment in our businesses, dividends and repurchases of our common stock; |
| |
• | reducing our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and market conditions; and |
| |
• | exposing us to interest rate risk because a portion of our debt obligations are at variable rates. |
We depend, in part, upon the issuance of debt to fund our operations and contractual commitments. If we require additional funding in order to fund outstanding financing commitments or meet other business requirements, our market liquidity may not be sufficient. A number of factors could cause us to incur increased borrowing costs and to have greater
difficulty accessing public and private markets for debt, including disruptions or declines in the global capital markets and/or a decline in our financial performance, outlook or credit ratings.
Quarterly Cash Dividends and Share Repurchases May Be Discontinued or Modified, Are Subject to a Number of Uncertainties and May Affect the Price of Our Common Stock.
Quarterly cash dividends and share repurchases under our share repurchase program constitute components of our capital allocation strategy, which we fund with free operating cash flow, borrowings and divestitures. However, we are not required to declare dividends or make any share repurchases under our share repurchase program. Dividends and share repurchases may be discontinued, accelerated, suspended or delayed at any time without prior notice. Even if not discontinued, the amount of such dividends and repurchases may be changed, and the amount, timing and frequency of such dividends and repurchases may vary from historical practice or from the company’s stated expectations. Decisions with respect to dividends and share repurchases are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based on a variety of factors. Important factors that could cause us to discontinue, limit, suspend, increase or delay our quarterly cash dividends or share repurchases include market conditions, the price of our common stock, the nature and timing of other investment opportunities, changes in our business strategy, the terms of our financing arrangements, our outlook as to the ability to obtain financing at attractive rates, the impact on our credit ratings and the availability of domestic cash.
The reduction or elimination of our cash dividend or share repurchase program could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Additionally, repurchases of our shares will reduce the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. There can be no assurance that any share repurchases will enhance shareholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares of common stock. Although our share repurchase program is intended to enhance long-term shareholder value, short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program's effectiveness.
See Item 5, "Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" in this Form 10-K for a description of our share repurchase program and past share repurchases, including our prior accelerated share repurchase (ASR) transactions.
We Design, Manufacture and Service Products that Incorporate Advanced Technologies; The Introduction of New Products and Technologies Involves Risks and We May Not Realize the Degree or Timing of Benefits Initially Anticipated.
We seek to achieve growth through the design, development, production, sale and support of innovative products that incorporate advanced technologies. The product, program and service needs of our customers change and evolve regularly, and we invest substantial amounts in research and development efforts to pursue advancements in a wide range of technologies, products and services. Of particular note, Pratt & Whitney is currently producing the PurePower® PW1000G Geared TurboFan engine to power various aircraft, including the A320neo family of aircraft, which entered into service in January 2016. The level of orders received for the PurePower® family of engines coupled with a requirement to achieve mature production levels in a very short timeframe are necessitating significant additional manufacturing and supply chain capacity. If our production ramp-up efforts are delayed or if suppliers cannot timely deliver or perform to our standards, we may not meet customers’ production schedules, which could result in material additional costs, including penalties that could be assessed under existing contractual provisions. Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our technological advancements depends on a variety of factors, including meeting development, production, certification and regulatory approval schedules; execution of internal and external performance plans; availability of supplier and internally-produced parts and materials; performance of suppliers and subcontractors; hiring and training of qualified personnel; achieving cost and production efficiencies; identification of emerging technological trends in our target end-markets; validation of innovative technologies; the level of customer interest in new technologies and products; and customer acceptance of our products and products that incorporate technologies we develop. For example, certain of our aerospace products are incorporated into larger systems and end products manufactured by our customers. These systems and end products may incorporate additional technologies manufactured by third parties and involve additional risks and uncertainties. As a result, the performance and market acceptance of these larger systems and end products could affect the level of customer interest and acceptance of our own products in the marketplace.
Any development efforts divert resources from other potential investments in our businesses, and these efforts may not lead to the development of new technologies or products on a timely basis or meet the needs of our customers as fully as competitive offerings. In addition, the markets for our products or products that incorporate our technologies may not develop or grow as we anticipate. We or our customers, suppliers or subcontractors may encounter difficulties in developing and producing new products and services, and may not realize the degree or timing of benefits initially anticipated or may otherwise suffer significant adverse financial consequences. Due to the design complexity of our products, we may in the future experience delays in completing the development and introduction of new products. Any delays could result in increased development costs or deflect resources from other projects. In particular, we cannot predict with certainty whether, when and in
what quantities our aerospace businesses will produce and sell aircraft engines, aircraft systems and components and other products currently in development or pending required certifications. Our contracts are typically awarded on a competitive basis. Our bids are based upon, among other items, the cost to provide the products and services. To generate an acceptable return on our investment in these contracts, we must be able to accurately estimate our costs to provide the services and deliver the products required by the contract and to be able to complete the contracts in a timely manner. If we fail to accurately estimate our costs or the time required to complete a contract, the profitability of our contracts may be materially and adversely affected. Some of our contracts provide for liquidated damages in the event that we are unable to perform and deliver in accordance with the contractual specifications and schedule. In addition, we may face customer directed cost reduction targets that could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our contracts. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that our competitors will not develop competing technologies which gain market acceptance in advance of or instead of our products. The possibility exists that our competitors might develop new technology or offerings that might cause our existing technology and offerings to become obsolete. In addition, the possibility exists that competitors will develop aftermarket services and aftermarket parts for our products which attract customers and adversely impact our return on investment on new products. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Our Business May Be Affected by Government Contracting Risks.
Most of our government contracts are fixed-price contracts. While fixed price contracts enable us to benefit from performance improvements, cost reductions and efficiencies, they also subject us to the risk of reduced margins or losses if we are unable to achieve estimated costs and revenues. U.S. Government contracts are subject to termination by the government, either for the convenience of the government or for default as a result of our failure to perform under the applicable contract. If terminated by the government as a result of our default, we could be liable for additional costs the government incurs in acquiring undelivered goods or services from another source and any other damages it suffers. We are now, and believe that in light of the current U.S. Government contracting environment we will continue to be, the subject of U.S. Government investigations relating to certain of our U.S. Government contracts. Such U.S. Government investigations often take years to complete and could result in administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines, treble and other damages, forfeitures, restitution or penalties, or could lead to suspension or debarment of U.S. Government contracting or of export privileges. For instance, if we or one of our business units were charged with wrongdoing as a result of any U.S. Government investigation (including violation of certain environmental or export laws, as further described below), the U.S. Government could suspend us from bidding on or receiving awards of new U.S. Government contracts pending the completion of legal proceedings. If convicted or found liable, the U.S. Government could fine and debar us from new U.S. Government contracting for a period generally not to exceed three years. The U.S. Government also reserves the right to debar a contractor from receiving new government contracts for fraudulent, criminal or other seriously improper conduct. The U.S. Government could void any contracts found to be tainted by fraud. Our contracts with the U.S. Government are also subject to audits. Like many defense contractors, we have received audit reports, which recommend that certain contract prices should be reduced to comply with various government regulations, including because cost or pricing data we submitted in negotiation of the contract prices or cost accounting practices may not have conformed to government regulations, or that certain payments be delayed or withheld. Some of these audit reports involved substantial amounts.
Exports of Certain of Our Products Are Subject to Various Export Control Regulations and May Require Authorization From the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, or the U.S. Department of the Treasury or Regulatory Agencies of Other Countries.
As an exporter, we must comply with various laws and regulations relating to the export of products, services and technology from the U.S. and other countries having jurisdiction over our operations. In the U.S., these laws include, among others, the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) administered by the U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and trade sanctions regulations and embargoes administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control. Certain of our products have military or strategic applications and are on the Munitions List of the ITAR and the Commerce Control List of the EAR, or represent so-called "dual use" items governed by the EAR. As a result, these products may require prior authorization to be exported to certain jurisdictions. Any failures by us or our customers or suppliers to comply with these laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, adverse publicity or restrictions on our ability to export our products, and repeat failures could carry more significant penalties. Any changes in export or sanctions regulations may further restrict the export of our products. The length of time required by the licensing processes can vary, potentially delaying the shipment of products and the recognition of the corresponding revenue. Any restrictions on the export of our products or product lines could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We Are Subject to Litigation, Environmental, Product Safety and Other Legal and Compliance Risks.
We are subject to a variety of litigation and legal compliance risks. These risks include, among other things, possible liability relating to product safety, personal injuries, intellectual property rights, contract-related claims, government contracts, taxes, environmental matters and compliance with U.S. and foreign laws, competition laws and laws governing improper business practices. We or one of our business units could be charged with wrongdoing as a result of such matters. If convicted or found liable, we could be subject to significant fines, penalties, repayments, other damages (in certain cases, treble damages). As a global business, we are subject to complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. Those laws and regulations may be interpreted in different ways. They may also change from time to time, as may related interpretations and other guidance. Changes in laws or regulations could result in higher expenses and payments, and uncertainty relating to laws or regulations may also affect how we conduct our operations and structure our investments and could limit our ability to enforce our rights. Changes in environmental and climate change laws or regulations, including laws relating to greenhouse gas emissions, could lead to new or additional investment in product designs and could increase environmental compliance expenditures. Changes in climate change concerns, or in the regulation of such concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, could subject us to additional costs and restrictions, including increased energy and raw materials costs.
At times we are involved in disputes with private parties over environmental issues, including litigation over allocation of cleanup costs, alleged personal injuries and alleged property damage. Personal injury lawsuits may involve individual and purported class actions alleging that contaminants originating from our or our subsidiaries’ current or former operating facilities caused or contributed to medical conditions, including cancers incurred by employees, former employees or residents in the area and environmental damage or diminution of real estate values. Even in litigation where we believe our liability is remote, there is a risk that a negative finding or decision in a matter involving multiple plaintiffs or a purported class action could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition, in particular with respect to environmental claims in regions where we have, or previously had, significant operations. Product recalls and product liability claims (including claims related to the safety or reliability of our products) also can result in significant costs, including fines, as well as negative publicity, management distraction and damage to our reputation that could reduce demand for our products and services. For a description of current material legal proceedings, see "Legal Proceedings" in in this Form 10-K and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report.
In addition, the FCPA and other anti-bribery and corruption laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA applies to companies, individual directors, officers, employees and agents. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. The FCPA also imposes accounting standards and requirements on publicly traded U.S. corporations and their foreign affiliates, which are intended to prevent the diversion of corporate funds to the payment of bribes and other improper payments. Certain of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. are with governmental entities and are therefore subject to the FCPA and other anti-bribery and corruption laws. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery and corruption laws. Despite meaningful measures that we undertake to seek to ensure lawful conduct, which include training and internal control policies, these measures may not always prevent our employees or agents from violating the FCPA or similar laws. As a result, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement, further changes or enhancements to our procedures, policies and controls, personnel changes or other remedial actions. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our operations, involve significant management distraction and result in a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Additional Tax Expense or Additional Tax Exposures Could Affect Our Future Profitability.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various international jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws and regulations, as well as changes and conflicts in related interpretations and other tax guidance could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities and our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business we are subject to examinations by various authorities, including tax authorities. In addition to ongoing investigations, there could be additional investigations launched in the future by governmental authorities in various jurisdictions, and existing investigations could be expanded. The global and diverse nature of our operations means that these risks will continue to exist and additional investigations, proceedings and contingencies will arise from time to time. Our competitive position, cash flows, results of operation or financial condition may be affected by the outcome of investigations, proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty.
See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report for further discussion on income taxes and related contingencies.
Our Defined Benefit Pension Plans are Subject to Financial Market Risk that Could Adversely Affect Our Results.
The performance of the financial markets and interest rates can impact our defined benefit pension plan expenses and funding obligations. Significant decreases in the discount rate or investment losses on plan assets may increase our funding obligations and adversely impact our financial results. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report for further discussion on pension plans and related obligations and contingencies.
We May Be Unable to Realize Expected Benefits From Our Cost Reduction and Restructuring Efforts and Our Profitability May Be Hurt or Our Business Otherwise Might Be Adversely Affected.
In order to operate more efficiently and control costs, we announce from time to time restructuring plans, which include workforce reductions as well as global facility consolidations and other cost reduction initiatives. These plans are intended to generate operating expense savings through direct cost and indirect overhead expense reductions as well as other savings. We may undertake further workforce reductions or restructuring actions in the future. These types of cost reduction and restructuring activities are complex. If we do not successfully manage our current restructuring activities, or any other restructuring activities that we may undertake in the future, expected efficiencies and benefits might be delayed or not realized, and our operations and business could be disrupted. Risks associated with these actions and other workforce management issues include political responses to such actions, unforeseen delays in implementation of anticipated workforce reductions, additional unexpected costs, adverse effects on employee morale and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees or work stoppages, any of which may impair our ability to achieve anticipated cost reductions or may otherwise harm our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Our Business and Financial Performance May Be Adversely Affected By Attacks on Information Technology Infrastructure and Other Cyber-based and Business Disruptions.
Our business may be impacted by disruptions to our own or third party information technology (“IT”) infrastructure, which could result from (among other causes) attacks on or failures of such infrastructure, compromises to its physical security, as well as from damaging weather or other acts of nature. Cyber-based risks, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, both attacks on our IT infrastructure and attacks on the IT infrastructure of third parties (both on premises and in the cloud) in attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential or other proprietary information, classified information, or information relating to our employees, customers and other third parties. Cyber-based risks could also include attacks targeting the security, integrity and/or reliability of the hardware, software and information installed, stored or transmitted in our products, including after the purchase of those products and when they are incorporated into third party products, facilities or infrastructure. Such attacks could result in disruptions to systems (our own or those of third parties), unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data (our own or that of third parties). We have experienced cyber-based attacks and may continue to experience them going forward, potentially with more frequency. We believe that we have adopted appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks to our technology, products, services and operations from these potential attacks. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of such attacks or other disruptions, we could potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products and services to our customers, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, misappropriation, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our or third party systems, networks or products, financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business or potential liability, and/or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We Depend On Our Intellectual Property, and Have Access to Certain Intellectual Property and Information of Our Customers and Suppliers; Infringement or Failure to Protect Our Intellectual Property Could Adversely Affect Our Future Growth and Success.
We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, nondisclosure agreements, information technology security systems, internal controls and compliance systems and other measures to protect our proprietary intellectual property. We also rely on nondisclosure agreements, information technology security systems and other measures to protect certain customer and supplier information and intellectual property that we have in our possession or to which we have access. Our efforts to protect intellectual property and proprietary rights may not be sufficient. We cannot be sure that our pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents to us, that patents issued to or licensed by us in the past or in the future will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors, or that these patents will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to preclude our competitors from introducing technologies similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications. Our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights may be limited in certain countries outside the U.S. In addition, we may be the target of competitor or other third party patent enforcement actions seeking substantial monetary damages or seeking to prevent our sale and marketing of certain of our products or services. We may also be subject to disruptions, losses
and liability resulting from various cybersecurity attacks or information technology failures, as described above. Any of these events or factors could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, subject us to judgments, penalties and significant litigation costs or temporarily or permanently disrupt our sales and marketing of the affected products or services. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
| |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Facilities - Owned |
Location | | Otis | | UTC
Climate,
Controls &
Security | | Pratt &
Whitney | | UTC
Aerospace
Systems | | Other | | Total |
Manufacturing & Aftermarket Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | 1 |
| | 8 |
| | 27 |
| | 37 |
| | — |
| | 73 |
|
Europe & Middle East | | 7 |
| | 14 |
| | 2 |
| | 21 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
Asia | | — |
| | 1 |
| | 7 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
|
Emerging Markets* | | 10 |
| | 19 |
| | 6 |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | 48 |
|
| | 18 |
| | 42 |
| | 42 |
| | 75 |
| | — |
| | 177 |
|
Non-Manufacturing & Aftermarket Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | 2 |
| | 15 |
| | 27 |
| | 8 |
| | 13 |
| | 65 |
|
Europe & Middle East | | 9 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
|
Asia | | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Central and Latin America | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Emerging Markets* | | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| | 13 |
| | 33 |
| | 27 |
| | 14 |
| | 13 |
| | 100 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Facilities - Leased |
Location | | Otis | | UTC
Climate,
Controls &
Security | | Pratt &
Whitney | | UTC
Aerospace
Systems | | Other | | Total |
Manufacturing & Aftermarket Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | — |
| | 4 |
| | 14 |
| | 27 |
| | — |
| | 45 |
|
Europe & Middle East | | — |
| | 2 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 10 |
|
Asia | | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
Emerging Markets* | | 4 |
| | 5 |
| | 2 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
| | 4 |
| | 11 |
| | 21 |
| | 42 |
| | — |
| | 78 |
|
Non-Manufacturing & Aftermarket Services: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | 4 |
| | 32 |
| | 8 |
| | 10 |
| | 7 |
| | 61 |
|
Europe & Middle East | | 9 |
| | 34 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 47 |
|
Asia | | 2 |
| | 6 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 10 |
|
Emerging Markets* | | 11 |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 27 |
|
| | 26 |
| | 86 |
| | 9 |
| | 17 |
| | 7 |
| | 145 |
|
| |
* | For purposes of this table, our definition of emerging markets is developed using the countries included in the MSCI Emerging Markets IndexSM. |
Our fixed assets as of December 31, 2016 include manufacturing facilities and non-manufacturing facilities such as warehouses set forth in the tables above and a substantial quantity of machinery and equipment, most of which are general
purpose machinery and equipment using special jigs, tools and fixtures and in many instances having automatic control features and special adaptations. The facilities, warehouses, machinery and equipment in use as of December 31, 2016 are in good operating condition, are well-maintained and substantially all are generally in regular use.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Export Violations
As previously disclosed, on June 28, 2012, we entered into a four-year Consent Agreement (CA) with the U.S. State Department’s Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (DTCC) to resolve violations of the U.S. Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) that we had voluntarily disclosed to DTCC. DTCC officially closed the CA on October 11, 2016.
As previously disclosed, in June 2012, DTCC imposed a partial statutory debarment on P&WC with respect to obtaining new or renewed ITAR license privileges following P&WC's guilty plea to criminal violation of the AECA and ITAR. The debarment does not affect ITAR licenses/authorizations existing at the time of the partial debarment, nor does it extend to programs supporting: (1) the U.S. Government; (2) NATO allies; or (3) "major non-NATO allies" (as defined in the ITAR). P&WC may seek and has received "transaction exception" approvals on a case-by-case basis for new or renewed ITAR licensing in other cases during the period of debarment. In February 2015, P&WC applied for full reinstatement of its ITAR privileges. DTCC’s decision on P&WC’s application is pending. UTC expects DTCC to terminate the debarment and reinstate P&WC’s full ITAR privileges, and we are awaiting formal action.
Pratt & Whitney Grand Jury Subpoena
As previously disclosed, Pratt & Whitney received a subpoena in May 2012 issued by a federal grand jury in Connecticut, requesting documents related to Pratt & Whitney’s use in certain military engines of titanium procured from suppliers that potentially did not conform to underlying contract specifications. In January 2017, the U.S. Attorney's office in Connecticut informed the Company that the grand jury investigation was closed and that the matter was referred to its civil division for further review. In connection with that review, Pratt & Whitney received a civil subpoena from the Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, seeking the documents requested by the grand jury subpoena. We cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter given the current procedural status of the matter.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act
As previously disclosed, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. (UTCFS) was named as a defendant in numerous putative class actions that were filed on behalf of purported classes of persons who alleged that third-party entities placed "robocalls" and/or placed calls to numbers listed on the "Do Not Call Registry" on behalf of UTCFS in contravention of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In each putative class action suit, plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and monetary damages. Each violation under the TCPA provides for $500 in statutory damages or up to $1,500 for any willful violation. In August 2016, UTCFS moved for summary judgment in the Northern District of West Virginia, the court in which all of the pending TCPA cases has been consolidated, arguing that the third parties who placed the calls in alleged violation of the TCPA were not acting as UTCFS’ agents and, therefore, UTCFS could not be vicariously liable for those calls under the TCPA. On December 22, 2016, the district court granted UTCFS’ summary judgment motion and dismissed the claims against UTCFS. Plaintiffs have not yet filed an appeal.
DOJ/SEC Investigations
As previously disclosed, in December 2013 and January 2014, UTC made voluntary disclosures to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Division of Enforcement and the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office to report the status of its internal investigation regarding a non-employee sales representative retained by United Technologies International Operations, Inc. (UTIO) and IAE for the sale of Pratt & Whitney and IAE engines and aftermarket services, respectively, in China. On April 7, 2014, the SEC notified UTC that it was conducting a formal investigation and issued a subpoena to UTC. The DOJ and SEC also continue to request information, and the SEC issued a second subpoena on March 9, 2015 seeking documents related to internal allegations of alleged violations of anti-bribery laws from UTC’s aerospace and commercial businesses, including but not limited to Otis businesses in China. UTC continues to cooperate fully with the investigations and respond to requests for documents and information. Because the investigations are ongoing, we cannot predict the outcome or the consequences thereof at this time.
At the outset of the internal investigation, UTIO and IAE suspended all commission payments to the sales representative, and UTIO and IAE have not resumed making any payments. This led to two claims by the sales representative for unpaid commissions: a civil lawsuit filed against UTIO and UTC and an arbitration claim against IAE. In December 2014, the sales representative voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit and agreed to withdraw the arbitration claim, each without prejudice to allow
the sales representative to re-assert the claims, but only on or after January 1, 2016. We anticipate that we would contest any future claim, and do not believe that the resolution of a future lawsuit or arbitration by the sales representative would have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Mos Otis FAS Investigation
As previously disclosed, following inspections carried out by the Russian Federal Anti-monopoly Service (FAS) at the offices of Mos Otis and the production of documents by Mos Otis, in October 2014 FAS notified Mos Otis that it had found indications of violations of Russian competition law in the market for maintenance of unified dispatch systems, which remotely monitor elevators and dispatch service technicians in Moscow. Mos Otis is an indirectly owned and controlled joint venture between Otis and the City of Moscow. FAS has not pursued an administrative action against Mos Otis to date. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate the range of any potential loss or impact to the business that may result.
In addition, we are subject to a number of other lawsuits, investigations and claims (some of which involve substantial amounts). For a discussion of contingencies related to certain other legal proceedings, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report. Except as indicated herein or in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report, we do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect upon our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
A further discussion of government contracts and related investigations, as well as a discussion of our environmental liabilities, can be found under the heading "Other Matters Relating to Our Business as a Whole – Compliance with Environmental and Other Government Regulations" in Item 1, "Business," and in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," in this Form 10-K.
| |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
PART II
| |
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Performance Graph and Comparative Stock Data appearing in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, containing the following data relating to our common stock: total shareholder return, principal market, quarterly high and low sales prices, approximate number of shareowners and frequency and amount of dividends, are incorporated herein by reference. The information required by Item 5 with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information about our purchases during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (000's) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Program (000's) | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (dollars in millions) |
October 1 - October 31 | | 12,017 |
| | $ | 100.58 |
| | 12,017 |
| | $ | 4,106 |
| |
November 1 - November 30 | | 3,178 |
| | 104.72 |
| | 3,178 |
| | $ | 3,773 |
| |
December 1 - December 31 | | 249 |
| | 107.73 |
| | 249 |
| | $ | 3,746 |
| |
Total | | 15,444 |
| | $ | 101.55 |
| | 15,444 |
| | |
On October 14, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to $12 billion of our common stock. At December 31, 2016, the maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under this program was approximately $3,746 million. Under this program, shares may be purchased on the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, under accelerated share repurchase (ASR) programs and under plans complying with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may also reacquire shares outside of the program from time to time in connection with the surrender of shares to cover taxes on vesting of restricted stock. No shares were reacquired in transactions outside the program during the quarter ended December 31, 2016.
On November 11, 2015, we entered into ASR agreements to repurchase an aggregate of $6 billion of our common stock utilizing the net after-tax proceeds from the sale of Sikorsky. The ASR agreements provide for the repurchase of our common stock based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the term of such ASR agreement, less a discount and subject to adjustments pursuant to the terms and conditions of the ASR agreement. Under the terms of the ASR agreements, we made the aggregate payments and received an initial delivery of approximately 51.9 million shares of our common stock, representing approximately 85% of the shares expected to be repurchased. The shares associated with the remaining portion of the aggregate purchase price have been settled over six tranches. In January 2016, the shares associated with the remaining portion of the first tranche of the aggregate purchase were settled upon final delivery to us of approximately 2,078 thousand shares of common stock. In September 2016, the shares associated with the remaining portion of the remaining five tranches of the aggregate purchase were settled upon final delivery to us of approximately 8,042 thousand additional shares of common stock. Including the remaining shares associated with the six tranches settled in 2016, the final price under the November 11, 2015 ASR was $96.74 per share.
| |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The Five-Year Summary appearing in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in our 2016 Annual Report for a description of any accounting changes and acquisitions or dispositions of businesses materially affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the Five-Year Summary.
| |
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The information set forth in the section entitled "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
For information concerning market risk sensitive instruments, see discussion under the heading "Market Risk and Risk Management" in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, and under the heading "Foreign Exchange and Hedging Activity" and "Financial Instruments" in Note 1 and in Note 14, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K.
| |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet, and other consolidated financial statements for the years ended 2016, 2015 and 2014, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated February 9, 2017 in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, are incorporated herein by reference. The 2016 and 2015 unaudited Selected Quarterly Financial Data appearing in our 2016 Annual Report, filed as Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference.
| |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
| |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Corporate Vice President, Controller (Controller), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our CEO, CFO and Controller concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms,
and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO, CFO and Controller, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making its assessment, management has utilized the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that based on its assessment, our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which appears in our 2016 Annual Report.
| |
Item 9B. | Other Information |
Section 13(r)(1)(D)Disclosures
The following activities are disclosed as required by Section 13(r)(1)(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act):
In the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ended on March 31, 2016, the Company disclosed, under the heading "Other" in the "Business Overview" section in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in each such report, activities as required by Section 13(r)(1)(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Such disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.
PART III
| |
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
The information required by Item 10 with respect to directors, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and audit committee financial experts is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Election of Directors" (under the subheading "Nominees") and "Corporate Governance" (including under the subheadings "Board Committees," "Audit Committee" and "Governance and Public Policy Committee").
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following persons are executive officers of United Technologies Corporation:
|
| | | | | | |
Name | | Title | | Other Business Experience Since 1/1/2012 | | Age as of 2/9/2017 |
| | | |
Elizabeth B. Amato | | Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer, United Technologies Corporation (since August 2012)* | | Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organization, United Technologies Corporation; Vice President, Human Resources, UTC Climate, Controls & Security | | 60 |
| | | | | | |
Robert J. Bailey | | Corporate Vice President, Controller, United Technologies Corporation (since September 2016) | | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Pratt & Whitney; Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Hamilton Sundstrand | | 52 |
| | | | | | |
Philippe Delpech | | President, Otis Elevator (since September 2015) | | Chief Operating Officer, Intercontinental Operations, UTC Building & Industrial Systems; Chief Operating Officer for UTC Climate, Controls & Security; President, EMEA, UTC Climate, Controls & Security | | 54 |
| | | | | | |
Michael R. Dumais | | Executive Vice President, Operations & Strategy, United Technologies Corporation (since January 2017) | | Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning, United Technologies Corporation: President, Power, Controls & Sensing Systems, UTC Aerospace Systems; President, Hamilton Sundstrand | | 50 |
| | | |
Charles D. Gill | | Executive Vice President & General Counsel, United Technologies Corporation (since 2007)* | | Senior Vice President and General Counsel, United Technologies Corporation | | 52 |
| | | |
David L. Gitlin | | President, UTC Aerospace Systems (since January 2015) | | President, Aircraft Systems, UTC Aerospace Systems; Vice President of Integration - UTC Propulsion & Aerospace Systems | | 47 |
| | | |
Gregory J. Hayes | | Chairman (since September 2016), President and Chief Executive Officer, United Technologies Corporation (since November 2014) | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Technologies Corporation
| | 56 |
| | | | | | |
Akhil Johri | | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, United Technologies Corporation (since January 2015)*
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Technologies Corporation; Chief Financial Officer, Pall Corporation; Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of UTC Propulsion & Aerospace Systems | | 55 |
| | | | | | |
Robert F. Leduc | | President, Pratt & Whitney (since January 2016) | | President, Sikorsky Aircraft; Operating Partner, Advent International; President, Boeing Programs and Space, UTC Aerospace Systems | | 60 |
| | | |
Robert J. McDonough | | President, UTC Climate, Controls & Security (since September 2015) | | Chief Operating Officer, Americas, UTC Building & Industrial Systems; Chief Operating Officer, Americas, UTC Climate, Controls & Security; President, UTC Climate, Controls & Security, Americas | | 57 |
| | | | | | |
David R. Whitehouse | | Corporate Vice President, Treasurer, United Technologies Corporation (since April 2015)* | | Vice President, Treasurer, United Technologies Corporation; Director, Capital Markets, United Technologies Corporation; Senior Vice President & Treasurer, Frontier Communications | | 50 |
*Certain executive officers' titles changed in November 2015 without any change in his or her responsibilities.
All of the officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of United Technologies Corporation or the subsidiary designated.
Information concerning Section 16(a) compliance is incorporated herein by reference to the section of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Other Information" under the heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance." We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all our directors, officers, employees and representatives. This code is publicly available on our website at http://www.utc.com/How-We-Work/Ethics-And-Compliance/
Pages/Default.aspx. Amendments to the code of ethics and any grant of a waiver from a provision of the code requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules will be disclosed on our website. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Board of Directors’ Audit Committee, Finance Committee, Governance and Public Policy Committee and Committee on Compensation and Executive Development are available on our website at http://www.utc.com/Who-We-Are/Corporate-Governance/Pages/default.aspx. These materials may also be requested in print free of charge by writing to our Investor Relations Department at United Technologies Corporation, 10 Farm Springs Road, Investor Relations, Farmington, CT 06032.
| |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Executive Compensation," "Compensation of Directors" and "Report of Committee on Compensation and Executive Development."
| |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Stock Ownership Information."
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 concerning Common Stock issuable under UTC’s equity compensation plans.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareowners | | 13,639,000 |
| (1) | $ | 86.76 |
| | 40,545,000 |
| (2) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareowners | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Total | | 13,639,000 |
| | $ | 86.76 |
| | 40,545,000 |
| |
| |
(1) | Consists of: (i) shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options awarded under the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (LTIP); (ii) shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) awarded under the LTIP, (iii) shares of Common Stock issuable upon the vesting of outstanding deferred stock units and restricted stock units awarded under the United Technologies Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan, as amended and restated effective December 23, 2014 and (iv) shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to outstanding restricted stock unit and performance share unit awards, assuming performance at the target level, except for the 2014 performance share unit awards which reflect actual performance achieved. Under the LTIP, each SAR referred to in clause (ii) is exercisable for a number of shares of Common Stock having a value equal to the increase in the market price of a share of such stock from the date the SAR was granted. For purposes of determining the total number of shares to be issued in respect of outstanding SARs as reflected in Column (a) above, we have used the NYSE closing price for a share of Common Stock on December 31, 2016 of $109.62. The amount of shares of Common Stock referred to in clause (iv) above includes 2,033,000 restricted shares and restricted share units and 1,323,000 performance share units. Up to an additional 1,323,000 shares of Common Stock could be issued if performance goals are achieved above target. The weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights shown in column (b) takes into account only the shares identified in clause (i) and (ii). |
| |
(2) | Represents the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available to be awarded under the LTIP as of December 31, 2016. Performance share units and restricted stock units (Full Share Awards) will result in a reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock available for delivery under the LTIP in an amount equal to 4.03 times the number of shares to which the award corresponds. Stock options and stock appreciation rights do not constitute Full Share Awards and will result in a reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock available for delivery under the LTIP on a one-for-one basis. |
| |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Election of Directors" (under the subheading "Nominees"), "Corporate Governance" (under the subheading "Director Independence") and "Other Information" (under the subheading "Transactions with Related Persons").
| |
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the section of our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareowners titled "Appointment of a Firm of Independent Registered Public Accountants to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2017," including the information provided in that section with regard to "Audit Fees," "Audit-Related Fees," "Tax Fees" and "All Other Fees."
PART IV
| |
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
| |
(a) | Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits |
| |
(1) | Financial Statements (incorporated herein by reference to the 2016 Annual Report): |
|
| | | |
| | Page Number in Annual Report |
| | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | 31 |
|
| | |
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2016 | | 32 |
|
| | |
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three years ended December 31, 2016 | | 33 |
|
| | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 | | 34 |
|
| | |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2016 | | 35 |
|
| | |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2016 | | 36 |
|
| | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | 38 |
|
| | |
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) | | 75 |
|
| |
(2) | Financial Statement Schedule for the three years ended December 31, 2016: |
|
| | |
| | Page Number in Form 10-K |
| | |
SCHEDULE I—Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule | | |
| | |
SCHEDULE II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | | |
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
The following list of exhibits includes exhibits submitted with this Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and those incorporated by reference to other filings.
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | |
| | |
2.1 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2015, by and among United Technologies Corporation, the other Sellers identified therein and Lockheed Martin Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to UTC’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-812) filed with the SEC on July 20, 2015.
|
| | |
3(i) | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation, restated as of April 25, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to UTC’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-812) filed with the SEC on April 25, 2016. |
| | |
3(ii) | | Bylaws as amended and restated effective April 25, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to UTC's Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-812) filed with the SEC on April 25, 2016. |
| | |
4.1 | | Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2001, between UTC and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to UTC’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Commission file number 333-60276) filed with the SEC on May 4, 2001. UTC hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request a copy of each other instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of UTC and its consolidated subsidiaries and any unconsolidated subsidiaries. |
| | |
10.1 | | United Technologies Corporation Annual Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to UTC’s Proxy Statement for the 1975 Annual Meeting of Shareowners, Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective January 1, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and Amendment No. 2 thereto, effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. |
| | |
10.2 | | United Technologies Corporation Pension Preservation Plan, as amended and restated, effective December 31, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. |
| | |
10.3 | | United Technologies Corporation Senior Executive Severance Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(vi) to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992, as amended by Amendment thereto, effective December 10, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and Amendment thereto, effective June 11, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of UTC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-812) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, and Amendment thereto, dated February 4, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. |
| | |
10.4 | | United Technologies Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective January 1, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. |
| | |
10.5 | | United Technologies Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989, as amended by Amendment No. 1, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and Amendment No. 2, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. |
| | |
10.6 | | United Technologies Corporation Executive Leadership Group Program, as amended and restated, effective October 15, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to UTC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-812) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013. |
| | |
10.7 | | Schedule of Terms for Restricted Share Unit Retention Awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Executive Leadership Group Program (referred to above in Exhibit 10.6), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to UTC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-812) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013. |
| | |
|
| | |
10.8 | | Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Share Unit Retention Awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Executive Leadership Group Program (referred to above in Exhibit 10.6), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to UTC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Commission file number 1-812) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013. |
| | |
10.9 | | United Technologies Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective as of April 24, 2017.* |
| | |
10.10 | | Retainer Payment Election Form for United Technologies Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.9).* |
| | |
10.11 | | Form of Deferred Restricted Stock Unit Award relating to the United Technologies Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.9).* |
| | |
10.12 | | United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective April 28, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to UTC’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission file number 1-812) filed with the SEC on May 2, 2014, as further amended by Amendment No. 1, effective as of February 5, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to UTC's Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| | |
10.13 | | Schedule of Terms for restricted stock awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12) (Rev. January 2016), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| | |
10.14 | | Schedule of Terms for non-qualified stock option awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12) (Rev. January 2016), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| | |
10.15 | | Form of Award Agreement for non-qualified stock option awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12)* |
| | |
10.16 | | Schedule of Terms for performance share unit awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12) (Rev. January 2016), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| | |
10.17 | | Schedule of Terms for stock appreciation rights awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12) (Rev. January 2016), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| | |
10.18 | | Form of Award Agreement for restricted stock unit, performance share unit and stock appreciation rights awards relating to the United Technologies Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12)* |
| | |
10.19 | | United Technologies Corporation LTIP Performance Share Unit Deferral Plan, relating to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (referred to above in Exhibit 10.12), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. |
| | |
10.20 | | United Technologies Corporation International Deferred Compensation Replacement Plan, effective January 1, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. |
| | |
10.21 | | United Technologies Corporation Company Automatic Excess Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. |
| | |
10.22 | | United Technologies Corporation Savings Restoration Plan, effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to UTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Commission file number 1-812) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. |
| | |
10.23 | | Director Agreement between Otis Elevator Worldwide SPRL and Mr. Philippe Delpech entered into on September 1, 2016.* |
| | |
11 | | Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings* |
| | |
12 | | Statement Re: Computation of Ratios.* |
| | |
13 | | Excerpts from UTC’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareowners for the year ended December 31, 2016.* |
| | |
|
| | |
14 | | Code of Ethics. The UTC Code of Ethics may be accessed via UTC’s website at http://www.utc.com/How-We-Work/Ethics-And-Compliance/Pages/Default.aspx |
| | |
21 | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant.* |
| | |
23 | | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.* |
| | |
24 | | Powers of Attorney of Lloyd J. Austin III, Diane M. Bryant, John V. Faraci, Jean-Pierre Garnier, Edward A. Kangas, Ellen J. Kullman, Marshall O. Larsen, Harold W. McGraw III, Richard B. Myers, Fredric G. Reynolds, Brian C. Rogers, H. Patrick Swygert, André Villeneuve and Christine Todd Whitman.* |
| | |
31 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.* |
| | |
32 | | Section 1350 Certifications.* |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document.* (File name: utx-20161231.xml) |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.* (File name: utx-20161231.xsd) |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.* (File name: utx-20161231_cal.xml) |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.* File name: : utx-20161231_def.xml) |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.* (File name: utx-20161231_lab.xml) |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.* (File name: utx-20161231_pre.xml) |
Notes to Exhibits List:
| |
* | Submitted electronically herewith. |
Exhibits 10.1 through 10.23 are contracts, arrangements or compensatory plans filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of the requirements for Form 10-K reports.
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three years ended December 31, 2016, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2016, (v) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2016, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) Financial Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION |
| (Registrant) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ AKHIL JOHRI |
| | Akhil Johri |
| | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
| By: | /s/ ROBERT J. BAILEY |
| | Robert J. Bailey |
| | Corporate Vice President, Controller |
Date: February 9, 2017
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ GREGORY J. HAYES | | Director, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | | February 9, 2017 |
(Gregory J. Hayes) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ AKHIL JOHRI | | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | | February 9, 2017 |
(Akhil Johri) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ ROBERT J. BAILEY | | Corporate Vice President, Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | | February 9, 2017 |
(Robert J. Bailey) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ LLOYD J. AUSTIN III * | | Director | | |
(Lloyd J. Austin III) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ DIANE M. BRYANT * | | Director | | |
(Diane M. Bryant) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ JOHN V. FARACI * | | Director | | |
(John V. Faraci) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ JEAN-PIERRE GARNIER * | | Director | | |
(Jean-Pierre Garnier) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ EDWARD A. KANGAS * | | Director | | |
(Edward A. Kangas) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ ELLEN J. KULLMAN * | | Director | | |
(Ellen J. Kullman) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ MARSHALL O. LARSEN * | | Director | | |
(Marshall O. Larsen) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ HAROLD W. MCGRAW III * | | Director | | |
(Harold W. McGraw III) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ RICHARD B. MYERS * | | Director | | |
(Richard B. Myers) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ FREDRIC G. REYNOLDS * | | Director | | |
(Fredric G. Reynolds) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ BRIAN C. ROGERS * | | Director | | |
(Brian C. Rogers) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ H. PATRICK SWYGERT * | | Director | | |
(H. Patrick Swygert) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ ANDRÉ VILLENEUVE * | | Director | | |
(André Villeneuve) | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN * | | Director | | |
(Christine Todd Whitman) | | | | |
|
| |
*By: | /s/ CHARLES D. GILL |
| Charles D. Gill Executive Vice President & General Counsel, as Attorney-in-Fact |
Date: February 9, 2017
SCHEDULE I
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors and Shareowners
of United Technologies Corporation:
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated February 9, 2017 appearing in the 2016 Annual Report to Shareowners of United Technologies Corporation (which report and consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 9, 2017
SCHEDULE II
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Three years ended December 31, 2016
(Millions of Dollars)
|
| | | | |
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts and Other Customer Financing Activity: | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | 538 |
|
Provision charged to income | | 93 |
|
Doubtful accounts written off (net) | | (91 | ) |
Other adjustments | | (46 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | | 494 |
|
Provision charged to income | | 137 |
|
Doubtful accounts written off (net) | | (59 | ) |
Other adjustments | | (19 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | | 553 |
|
Provision charged to income | | 64 |
|
Doubtful accounts written off (net) | | (105 | ) |
Other adjustments | | (45 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | | $ | 467 |
|
Future Income Tax Benefits—Valuation allowance: | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | 942 |
|
Additions charged to income tax expense | | 91 |
|
Reductions credited to income tax expense | | (55 | ) |
Other adjustments 1 | | (366 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | | 612 |
|
Additions charged to income tax expense | | 42 |
|
Additions charged to goodwill, due to acquisitions | | 7 |
|
Reductions credited to income tax expense | | (41 | ) |
Other adjustments 1 | | (29 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | | 591 |
|
Additions charged to income tax expense | | 32 |
|
Reductions credited to income tax expense | | (61 | ) |
Other adjustments | | (17 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | | $ | 545 |
|
Note 1: Included in Other adjustments in the table above are adjustments to valuation allowances associated with an agreement with a state taxing authority for the monetization of tax credits.