Edgar Filing: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES INC

PRAA-2013.12.31-10K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-50058

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		75-3078675
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

120 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia		23502
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (888) 772-7326

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share		NASDAQ Global Select Market
(Title of Class)		(Name of Exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	þ	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO þ

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013 was $2,513,773,743 based on the $51.21 closing price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 19, 2014 was 49,899,024.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents



Part I
Item 1.	Business	5
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	18
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	30
Item 2.	Properties	30
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	30
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	30

Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	30
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	33
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	61
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	62
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	63
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	64
	Consolidated Income Statements	65
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	66
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	67
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	68
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	69
	2 – Finance Receivables, net	74
	3 – Accounts Receivable, net	76
	4 – Operating Leases	77
	5 – Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest	77
	6 – Goodwill and Intangibles Assets, net	77
	7 – Borrowings	79
	8 – Property and Equipment, net	81
	9 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures	82
	10 – Share-Based Compensation	83
	11 – Earnings Per Share	85
	12 – Stockholders Equity	85
	13 – Income Taxes	85
	14 – Commitment and Contingencies	88
	15 – 401(k) Retirement Plan	90
	16 – Subsequent Event	90
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	91
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	91
Item 9B.	Other Information	93

Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	93
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	93



Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	93
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	93
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	93

Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	94

Signatures		96

Cautionary Statements Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding overall trends, gross margin trends, operating cost trends, liquidity and capital needs and other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above may include the following:


•	a prolonged economic recovery or a deterioration in the economic or inflationary environment in the United States or Europe, particularly the United Kingdom, including the interest rate environment, may have an adverse effect on our collections, results of operations, revenue and stock price or on the stability of the financial system as a whole;


•	changes in the credit or capital markets, which affect our ability to borrow money or raise capital;


•	our ability to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices;


•	our ability to replace our defaulted consumer receivables with additional receivables portfolios;


•	our ability to obtain accurate and authentic account documents relating to accounts that we acquire and the possibility that documents that we provide could contain errors;


•	our ability to successfully acquire receivables of new asset types;


•	our ability to collect sufficient amounts on our defaulted consumer receivables;


•	changes in tax laws regarding earnings of our subsidiaries located outside of the United States;


•	changes in, or interpretations of, bankruptcy or collection laws that could negatively affect our business, including by causing an increase in certain types of bankruptcy filings involving liquidations, which may cause our collections to decrease;


•	changes in, or interpretations of, state or federal laws or the administrative practices of various bankruptcy courts, which may impact our ability to collect on our defaulted receivables;


•	our ability to collect and enforce our finance receivables may be limited under federal and state laws;


•	our ability to employ and retain qualified employees, especially collection personnel, and our senior management team;


•	our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the stability of our production and increase our costs;


•	the degree, nature, and resources of our competition;


•	the possibility that we could incur goodwill or other intangible asset impairment charges;


•	our ability to retain existing clients and obtain new clients for our fee-for-service businesses;


•	our ability to comply with existing and new regulations of the collection industry, the failure of which could result in penalties, fines, litigation, damage to our reputation or the suspension or termination of our ability to conduct our business;


•	changes in, or interpretations of, governmental laws and regulations which could increase our costs and liabilities or impact our operations;


•	the possibility that new business acquisitions prove unsuccessful or strain or divert our resources;


•	our ability to maintain, renegotiate or replace our credit facility;


•	our ability to satisfy the restrictive covenants in our debt agreements;


•	our ability to manage risks associated with our international operations;


•	the possibility that compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations could increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions;


•	the imposition of additional taxes on us, arising from such events as changes in the mix of earnings in different countries, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws or their interpretation, and/or an adverse ruling in our IRS audit matter;


•	changes in interest or exchange rates, which could reduce our net income, and the possibility that future hedging strategies may not be successful, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as could our failure to comply with hedge accounting principles and interpretations;


•	the possibility that we could incur significant allowance charges on our finance receivables;


•	our loss contingency accruals may not be adequate to cover actual losses;


•	our ability to manage growth successfully;


•	the possibility that we could incur business or technology disruptions or cyber incidents, or not adapt to technological advances;


•	the possibility that we or our industry could experience negative publicity or reputational attacks; and


•	the risk factors listed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

You should assume that the information appearing in this annual report is accurate only as of the date it was issued. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future events, developments or results, you should carefully review the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 18, as well as the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section beginning on page 37 and the “Business” section beginning on page 5.

Our forward-looking statements could be wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future events, developments or results described in this report could turn out to be materially different. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements after the date of this report and you should not expect us to do so.

Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts and others, we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material nonpublic information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst regardless of the content of the statement or report. We do not, by policy, confirm forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.

PART I



Item 1.	Business.

General

Our business focuses upon the detection, collection, and processing of both unpaid and normal-course accounts receivable originally owed to credit grantors, governments, retailers and others. Our primary business is the purchase, collection and management of portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. These are the unpaid obligations of individuals to credit originators, which include banks, credit unions, consumer and auto finance companies and retail merchants. We also provide fee-based services, including vehicle location, skip tracing and collateral recovery services for auto lenders, governments and law enforcement via PRA Location Services, LLC (“PLS”), revenue administration, audit and debt discovery/recovery services for local government entities through PRA Government Services, LLC and MuniServices, LLC (collectively “PGS”) and class action claims recovery services and related payment processing via Claims Compensation Bureau, LLC (“CCB”). In addition, with the acquisition of 100% of the equity interest of Mackenzie Hall Holdings, Limited, and its subsidiaries (“PRA UK”) on January 16, 2012, we expanded our contingent collection and purchase of defaulted consumer receivables businesses to the United Kingdom. We believe that the strengths of our business are our sophisticated approach to portfolio pricing, segmentation and servicing, our emphasis on developing and retaining our collection personnel, our sophisticated processing systems and procedures and our relationships with many of the largest consumer lenders in the United States.

Our debt purchase business specializes in receivables that have been charged-off by the credit originator. Because the credit originator and/or other debt servicing companies have unsuccessfully attempted to collect these receivables, we are able to purchase them at a substantial discount to their face value. From our 1996 inception through December 31, 2013, we acquired 3,098 portfolios, representing more than 34.8 million customer accounts and aggregated into 152 pools for accounting purposes, with a face value of $78.6 billion for a total purchase price of $3.3 billion. The success of our business depends on our ability to purchase portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate valuations and to collect on those receivables effectively and efficiently. We have one reportable segment, receivables management, based on similarities among the operating units including homogeneity of services, service delivery methods and use of technology.

We have achieved strong financial results since inception. For example, over the past ten years, our cash collections increased from $117.1 million in 2003 to $1.14 billion in 2013, representing a compound annual growth rate of 25.3%. Total revenue has grown from $84.9 million in 2003 to $735.1 million in 2013, representing a compound annual growth rate of 24.1%. Similarly, net income has grown from $20.7 million in 2003 to net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (“PRA”) of $175.3 million in 2013, representing a compound annual growth rate of 23.8%.

We were initially formed as Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, on March 20, 1996. In connection with our 2002 initial public offering (our “IPO”), all of the membership units of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. were exchanged, simultaneously with the effectiveness of our registration statement, for a single class of PRA common stock, and a new Delaware corporation formed on August 7, 2002. Accordingly, the members of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. became the common stockholders of PRA, which became the parent company of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries.

Definitions

We use the following terminology throughout this document:


•	“Allowance charges” refers to a reduction in income recognized on finance receivables on pools of finance receivables whose cash collection estimates are not received or projected to not be received.


•	“Amortization rate” refers to cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables as a percentage of total cash collections.


•	“Buybacks” refers to purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts.


•	“Cash collections” refers to collections on our owned portfolios.


•	“Cash receipts” refers to collections on our owned portfolios plus fee income.


•	“Core” accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that are defaulted consumer receivables and are not in a bankrupt status upon purchase. These accounts are aggregated separately from purchased bankruptcy accounts. Unless otherwise noted, Core accounts do not include the accounts we purchase in the United Kingdom.


•	“EBITDA” refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.


•	“Estimated remaining collections” or "ERC" refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections on our owned portfolios.


•	“Fee income” refers to revenues generated from our fee-for-service businesses.


•	“Income recognized on finance receivables” refers to income derived from our owned debt portfolios.


•	“Income recognized on finance receivables, net” refers to income derived from our owned debt portfolios net of allowance charges.


•	“Net finance receivable balance” is recorded on our balance sheet and refers to the purchase price less principal amortization and net allowance charges.


•	“Principal amortization” refers to cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables.


•	“Purchase price” refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire defaulted consumer receivables, plus certain capitalized costs, less buybacks.


•	“Purchase price multiple” refers to the total estimated collections on owned debt portfolios divided by purchase price.


•	“Purchased bankruptcy” accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that are in bankruptcy when we purchase them and as such are purchased as a pool of bankrupt accounts.


•	“Total estimated collections” refers to the actual cash collections, including cash sales, plus estimated remaining collections.

Available Information

PRA maintains an Internet website at the following address: www.portfoliorecovery.com.

We make available on or through our website certain reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We make this information available on our website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with or furnish it to the SEC. The information that is filed with the SEC may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition, information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at: www.sec.gov.

Reports filed with or furnished to the SEC are also available free of charge upon request by contacting our corporate office at:

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Attn: Corporate Communications

120 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 100

Norfolk, Virginia 23502

Competitive Strengths

We Offer a Compelling Alternative to Debt Owners and Governmental Entities

We offer debt owners the ability to immediately realize value for their charged-off receivables, through either one time spot purchase contracts or forward flow contracts that arrange for regular purchases from the debt owner. Our transactional flexibility helps us to meet the needs of debt owners, leverages our access to capital, and provides us with the opportunity to create consistent and enduring supply relationships. Through our government services business, and our UK subsidiary, we have the ability to service receivables in various ways including collecting on a contingent fee basis. For our government services business, this also includes

such services as processing tax payments on behalf of the client and extends to more complicated tax audit and discovery work, as well as additional services that fill the needs of our clients.

Disciplined and Proprietary Underwriting Process

One of the key components of our growth has been our ability to price portfolio acquisitions at levels that have generated profitable returns on investment. Since inception, we have been able to consistently collect more than our purchase price and costs over the collection life cycle of the defaulted consumer receivables portfolios we have acquired. In doing so, we have generated increasing profits and operational cash flow from these portfolio acquisitions, without relying on the resale of portfolios to achieve these results. We have not resold any of our purchased portfolios since 2002, and the portfolios we sold then were primarily in Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings. We stopped reselling these portfolios as we began the effort to build our own bankruptcy portfolio buying group which started purchasing bankrupt accounts in 2004.

By holding and collecting the accounts we purchase over the long-term, we create static pool history that we believe is unique among our peers. Our portfolio underwriting process utilizes the collection results, customer data, and account attributes held in our data warehouse. The warehouse contains data from more than 3,000 portfolios representing over 34 million accounts purchased over the last 17 years from large issuers and owners of consumer receivables. Our modeling capabilities continuously evolve as we incorporate new data and develop, test, and adopt new analysis tools that help us improve our underwriting accuracy.

The Core portfolio underwriting process includes both quantitative analytical modeling and qualitative judgment-based analysis that considers the effects of the origination, servicing, and collection history of the portfolios we price. The combination of our deep sample of purchase data, our sophisticated analytical modeling, and the underwriting judgment gained from underwriting thousands of portfolios affords PRA a significant competitive advantage over our competition.

Ability to Hire, Develop and Retain Collection Staff

We place considerable focus on our ability to hire, motivate and retain effective employees throughout the organization, especially our collection staff. We offer our employees competitive wages with the opportunity to receive incentive compensation based on performance while maintaining a focus on compliance. For collection staff, compliance failures may cause them to lose incentive pay that they would have otherwise earned; those payments may be distributed to other collection staff with outstanding compliance records. In addition we offer an attractive benefits package, a comfortable working environment and the ability to work on a flexible schedule. We are also committed to an environment that promotes diversity and inclusion.

As of December 31, 2013, we employed approximately 3,500 persons on a full-time basis worldwide. None of our employees are represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are positive.

Established Systems and Infrastructure

We have devoted significant effort to developing our systems, including statistical models, databases and reporting packages, to optimize our portfolio purchases and collection efforts. In addition, we believe that our technology infrastructure is flexible, secure, reliable and redundant, to protect the privacy of our sensitive data and to mitigate exposure to systems failure or unauthorized access.

We have developed financial models and systems for pricing portfolio acquisitions, managing the collections process and monitoring operating results. We prepare a static pool report monthly for each of our portfolios, populating actual results back into our acquisition models to enhance their accuracy. We monitor collection results continuously, seeking to identify and resolve negative trends promptly. In addition, we do not sell our purchased defaulted consumer receivables. Instead, we work them over the long-term enhancing our knowledge of a portfolio’s long-term performance. This combination of hardware, software and proprietary modeling and systems has been developed by our management team through years of experience in this industry and we believe provides us with an important competitive advantage from the acquisition process all the way through collection and payment operations.

Our systems and infrastructure also enhance our compliance activities. We employ a staff of Quality Control and Compliance employees whose role it is to monitor calls and observe collection system entries as well as design, implement, monitor and test our daily activities. We monitor and research daily exception reports that track significant account status movements and account changes. To enhance this process, where permissible, we employ sophisticated call and work action recording systems which allow us to better monitor compliance and quality of our customer contacts.

Strong Relationships with Major Credit Originators

We have done business with most of the largest consumer lenders in the United States. We maintain an active marketing effort and our senior management team is in contact on a regular basis with existing and potential sellers of defaulted consumer receivables. We believe that we have earned a reputation as a reliable and compliant purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios and as compliant collectors. From the perspective of the receivables seller, the failure to close on a negotiated sale of a portfolio consumes valuable time and expense and can have an adverse effect on pricing when the portfolio is re-marketed. Similarly, if a credit originator sells a portfolio to a debt buyer who has a reputation for violating laws or deviating from industry standard collection practices, the reputation of the credit originator can be damaged. We consistently attempt to negotiate reasonable and mutually acceptable contract terms, resulting in a confident and expeditious closing process for both parties. We go to great lengths to collect from consumers in a responsible, professional, and legally compliant manner. We believe our strong relationships with major credit originators provide us with access to quality opportunities for portfolio purchases.

Experienced Management Team

We have an experienced management team with considerable expertise in the accounts receivable management industry. Prior to our formation, our founders played key roles in the development and management of a consumer receivables acquisition and divestiture operation of Household Recovery Services, a subsidiary of Household International. As we have grown, the original management team has been expanded substantially to include a group of experienced, seasoned executives. Following is a summary of our executive management team.



Name	Position	Prior Experience	PRA Tenure (Years)	Relevant Industry Experience ( Years)
Steve Fredrickson	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	Household Recovery Services, Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company	17	30+
Kevin Stevenson	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary	Household Recovery Services, Household Bank	17	26+
Neal Stern	Executive Vice President, Operations	Target Financial Services, US Bank, Transamerica	5	23+
Chris Graves	Executive Vice President, Core Asset Acquisitions	Capital One, Signet Bank, First Union	8	22+
Judith Scott	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Housing Development Authority	15	30+
Kent McCammon	Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business Development	Trader Publishing Company, Atlantic Capital Management, Inc., Scott and Stringfellow, Smith Barney, Lehman Brothers, Shamrock Holdings, Inc.	6	25+
Michael Petit	President, Bankruptcy Services	Pacific Crest Securities, Caterpillar, Banc One Capital Markets, Ford Motor Company, Jefferies and Company, Continental Bank	10	25+
Steve Roberts	President, Business and Government Services	ShopText, Interpublic Group, Otis, Carrier, Digitas, United Technologies	1	29+
Michelle Link	Senior Vice President, Human Resources	Amerigroup, Corning, Cigna, Blue Cross Blue Shield	3	17+

Portfolio Acquisitions

Our portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables includes a diverse set of accounts that can be categorized by asset type, age and size of account, level of previous collection efforts and geography. To identify attractive buying opportunities, we maintain an extensive marketing effort with our senior officers contacting known and prospective sellers of defaulted consumer receivables. We have acquired receivables of Visa^®, MasterCard^®, private label and other credit cards, installment loans, lines of credit, bankrupt accounts, deficiency balances of various types, legal judgments, and trade payables, all from a variety of debt owners. These debt owners include major banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, telecommunication providers, retailers, utilities, insurance companies, medical groups, hospitals, auto finance companies, student loan companies, and other debt buyers. In addition, we make periodic visits to the operating sites of debt sellers and attend numerous industry events in an effort to develop account purchase opportunities. We also maintain active relationships with brokers of defaulted consumer receivables.

Portfolios by Type and Geography (Domestic Portfolio Only)

The following chart categorizes our life to date domestic portfolio purchases as of December 31, 2013 into the major asset types represented (amounts in thousands):



Asset Type	No. of Accounts	%		Face Value ⁽¹⁾		%		Original Purchase Price ⁽²⁾		%
Major Credit Cards	18,767	55	%	$	53,499,462	69	%	$	2,250,307	68	%
Consumer Finance	6,703	19		8,652,017		11		148,523		5
Private Label Credit Cards	8,115	24		11,040,563		14		797,289		24
Auto Deficiency	655	2		4,640,914		6		100,724		3
Total:	34,240	100	%	$	77,832,956	100	%	$	3,296,843	100	%


(1)	“Face Value” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.


(2)	“Original Purchase Price” represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.

Since our formation, we have purchased accounts from approximately 150 debt owners. We have acquired portfolios at various price levels, depending on the age of the portfolio, its geographic distribution, our historical experience with a certain asset type or credit originator and similar factors. A typical defaulted consumer receivables portfolio that we acquire ranges from $1 million to $150 million in face value and contains defaulted consumer receivables from diverse geographic locations with average initial individual account balances of $400 to $7,000.

We refer to the groups of domestic charged-off (non-bankrupt) defaulted consumer receivables we purchase as Core portfolios. The age of a Core portfolio (the time since an account has been charged-off) is an important factor in determining the value we place on the portfolio. Generally, there is an inverse relationship between the age of a Core portfolio and the price we can pay to purchase the portfolio. This relationship is due to the fact that older Core portfolio receivables typically liquidate at lower rates. The accounts receivables management industry places Core portfolio receivables into categories depending on the number of collection agencies that have previously attempted to collect on the receivables. Fresh accounts are typically past due 120 to 270 days, charged-off by the credit originator and are typically sold prior to the seller conducting any post-charge-off collection activity. These accounts typically sell for the highest purchase price. Primary accounts are charged-off, are typically 360 to 450 days past due, and have been previously placed with one contingent fee servicer and receive a lower purchase price. Secondary and tertiary accounts are charged-off, are typically more than 660 days past due, and have been placed with two or three contingent fee servicers and receive even lower purchase prices. We also purchase portfolios of charged-off accounts previously worked by four or more agencies and these are typically two to three years or more past due and receive an even lower price. In addition, we purchase portfolios of accounts that are included in consumer bankruptcies. These bankrupt accounts are typically filed under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have an associated payment plan that can range from 3 to 5 years in duration. We purchase portfolios of bankrupt accounts in both forward flow and spot transactions and, consequently, they can be at any age in the bankruptcy plan life cycle.

The following table summarizes our life to date domestic portfolio purchases as of December 31, 2013, into the delinquency categories represented (amounts in thousands):



Account Type	No. of Accounts	%		Face Value ⁽¹⁾		%		Original Purchase Price ⁽²⁾		%
Fresh	3,212	9	%	$	7,680,592	10	%	$	818,881	25	%
Primary	4,789	14		9,106,742		12		495,057		15
Secondary	6,150	18		9,179,787		12		382,429		12
Tertiary	4,307	13		6,304,937		8		104,519		3
Bankruptcy Trustees	5,344	16		22,496,916		29		1,338,134		40
Other	10,438	30		23,063,982		29		157,823		5
Total:	34,240	100	%	$	77,832,956	100	%	$	3,296,843	100	%


(1)	“Face Value” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.


(2)	“Original Purchase Price” represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.

We also review the geographic distribution of accounts within a portfolio because we have found that state specific laws and rules can have an effect on the collectability of accounts located there. In addition, economic factors and bankruptcy trends vary regionally and are factored into our purchase price equation.

The following table summarizes our life to date domestic portfolio purchases as of December 31, 2013, by geographic location (amounts in thousands):



Geographic Distribution	No. of Accounts	%		Face Value ⁽¹⁾		%		Original Purchase Price ⁽²⁾		%
California	3,687	11	%	$	10,321,143	13	%	$	419,670	13	%
Texas	4,791	14		8,425,708		11		280,132		8
Florida	2,730	8		7,356,289		9		295,328		9
New York	1,925	6		4,519,270		6		171,252		5
Ohio	1,610	5		2,928,792		4		137,296		4
Pennsylvania	1,227	4		2,833,775		4		118,307		4
Illinois	1,295	4		2,778,831		4		128,867		4
North Carolina	1,225	4		2,716,528		3		112,849		3
Georgia	1,118	3		2,559,975		3		125,284		4
Michigan	916	3		2,135,785		3		99,939		3
New Jersey	797	2		2,105,793		3		93,115		3
Arizona	623	2		1,689,429		2		70,545		2
Virginia	909	3		1,646,631		2		76,324		2
Tennessee	734	2		1,611,983		2		75,573		2
Massachusetts	584	2		1,428,007		2		59,027		2
Indiana	625	2		1,396,328		2		71,851		2
Other⁽³⁾	9,444	25		21,378,689		27		961,484		30
Total:	34,240	100	%	$	77,832,956	100	%	$	3,296,843	100	%


(1)	“Face Value” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.


(2)	“Original Purchase Price” represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables and has not been reduced by any adjustments, including payments and buybacks.


(3)	Each state included in “Other” represents less than 2% of the face value of total life-to-date domestic purchases.

Purchasing Process

We acquire portfolios from debt owners through auctions and negotiated sales. In an auction process, the seller will assemble a portfolio of receivables and will either broadly offer the portfolio to the market or seek purchase prices from specifically invited potential purchasers. In a privately negotiated sale process, the debt owner will contact known purchasers directly, take bids and negotiate the terms of sale. We also acquire accounts in forward flow contracts. Under a forward flow contract we agree to purchase defaulted consumer receivables from a debt owner on a periodic basis, at a set percentage of face value of the receivables over a specified time period, generally from three to twelve months. These agreements often contain a provision requiring that the attributes and selection criteria of the receivables to be sold will not significantly change each month. If this provision is not adhered to, the contract will typically allow for the early termination of the forward flow contract by the purchaser or other appropriate remedies as mutually agreed upon. Forward flow contracts provide receivable owners with a consistent source of value for defaulted accounts, and provide the debt buyer with a steady and reliable source of consumer receivables for its collection operation.

In a typical Core portfolio sale transaction, after signing a non-disclosure agreement, a debt owner distributes a computer data file containing ten to fifteen essential data fields on each consumer account in the portfolio offered for sale. Such fields typically include but are not limited to the customer's name, address, outstanding balance, date of charge-off, date of last payment and the date the account was opened. Information that is not typically provided includes the original underwriting documentation, charge and payment history prior to charge-off, and collection notations. We perform our initial due diligence on the portfolio by electronically cross-checking the data fields provided through secured delivery against the accounts in our owned portfolios and other databases. We compile a variety of portfolio level reports examining all available data.

In order to determine a purchase price for a Core portfolio, we use two separate internally developed computer models. We analyze the portfolio using our proprietary multiple linear regression model, which analyzes the accounts of the portfolio using predictive variables and projects a portfolio liquidation rate. We also analyze the portfolio as a whole using an adjustment model, which uses an appropriate cash flow model that utilizes our collections results from similar portfolios we have previously purchased. We supplement the adjustment model with qualitative background information about the origination, servicing and collection history of the portfolio. Finally, we employ a model that creates statistically similar portfolios from our existing accounts across our purchased inventory and develops estimated collection curves that are used in our price modeling. From these models we derive our quantitative projections which are used to help price transactions. The multiple linear regression model is also used to prioritize collection work efforts subsequent to purchase. With respect to prospective forward flow contracts and other long-term relationships, we obtain a representative file that we use to determine the price of the forward flow arrangement. Then each month during the flow term, we receive the actual monthly sale file to be funded, and compare it to the representative file noted above to determine if the delivered file meets the expectations of the initial pricing file. This process allows us to confirm that the accounts we are purchasing are materially consistent with the accounts we agreed to purchase under the forward flow contract. When purchasing bankrupt consumer receivables, we follow a similar analytical process but utilize completely separate, specifically designed pricing models.

We maintain a detailed static pool profile for each portfolio that we have acquired, capturing demographic data and revenue and expense items for further analysis. We use our static pool analysis to refine the underwriting models that we use to price future portfolio purchases. The results of the static pool analysis are input back into our models, increasing the accuracy of the models as the data set increases with every portfolio purchase and each day’s collection efforts. Since we do not sell our purchased defaulted consumer receivables, we work them over the long-term, enhancing our knowledge of a pool’s long-term performance.

The quantitative and qualitative data derived in our due diligence process is evaluated, considering both any subjective factors about the portfolio or the debt owner and our knowledge of the current defaulted consumer receivables market. A portfolio acquisition approval memorandum is then prepared for each prospective portfolio before a purchase price is submitted to the debt owner. This approval memorandum, which outlines the portfolio’s anticipated collectability and purchase structure, is distributed to members of our Investment Committee. The approval by the Investment Committee sets a maximum purchase price for the portfolio.

Once a portfolio purchase has been approved by our Investment Committee and the terms of the sale have been agreed to with the debt owner, the acquisition is documented in an agreement that contains customary terms and conditions. Provisions are typically incorporated for disputed, fraudulent, deceased, bankrupt (in the case of Core portfolio purchases), or other ineligible accounts and typically, the debt owner either agrees to repurchase these accounts or replace them with acceptable replacement accounts within certain time frames.

Owned Portfolio Collection Operations

Call Center Operations – Core Portfolios

Our work flow management system places, recalls and prioritizes accounts, based on our analyses of our accounts and other demographic, credit and customer behavior attributes and prior collection work activities. We use this process to focus our work effort on those customers most likely to pay.

The collectability forecast for a newly acquired portfolio will help determine our initial collection strategy. Accounts that are initially determined to have the highest predicted collection probability will be worked immediately and with greater efforts. Less collectible accounts may be set aside to be worked with less frequency or with lower cost methods. After owning an account for a month we begin reassessing the collectability on a daily basis based on a set of observed account characteristics and behaviors. Some accounts may be worked using a letter and/or settlement strategy.

Our computer system allows each collector to view the scanned documents relating to the accounts that have been received from the seller and customer, which can include the original account application, account statements, payment checks, customer correspondence and other documents.

On the initial contact call, a customer is given a standardized presentation regarding the benefits of resolving his or her account with us. Emphasis is placed on determining the reason for the customer’s default in order to better assess the customer’s situation and create a plan for repayment. The collectors work to obtain a repayment plan that is appropriate to the customer's ability to make a repayment. At times, when determined to be appropriate, and in many cases with management approval, a reduced lump-sum settlement may be agreed upon.

If a collector is unable to establish contact with a customer based on information received or stored, the system will supplement the account information by leveraging a series of automated skip tracing procedures. Skip tracing is the process of developing new phone, address, job or asset information on a customer, or verifying the accuracy of such information.

Legal Recovery – Core Portfolios

An important component of our collections effort involves our legal recovery department and the judicial collection of accounts of customers who we believe have the ability, but not the willingness, to resolve their obligations. Accounts for which the customer is not cooperative and for which we can establish garnishable wages or attachable assets are reviewed for legal action. Additionally, we review accounts using a proprietary scoring model and select those accounts reflecting a high propensity to pay in a legal environment. Depending on the balance of the defaulted consumer receivable and the applicable state collection laws, we determine whether to commence legal action to judicially collect on the receivable. The legal process can take an extended period of time, but it also generates cash collections that likely would not have been realized otherwise.

We use a combination of internal staff (attorney and support), as well as external attorneys, to pursue legal collections under certain circumstances. Over the past several years we have focused on developing our internal legal collection capability. In the United States, we have the capability in all 50 states to initiate lawsuits in amounts up to the jurisdictional limits of the respective courts. Our legal recovery department, using external vendors, also collects claims against estates in cases involving deceased debtors having assets at the time of death. Our legal recovery department oversees our internal legal collections and coordinates a nationwide collections attorney network which is responsible for the preparation and filing of judicial collection proceedings in multiple jurisdictions, determining the suit criteria, and instituting wage garnishments to satisfy judgments. Our external law firms work on a contingent fee basis. Legal cash collections generated by both our in house attorneys and outside independent contingent fee attorneys constituted approximately 28% of our total cash collections in 2013. As our portfolio matures, it is likely that a larger number of accounts will be directed to our legal recovery department for judicial collection; consequently, we anticipate that legal cash collections will grow commensurately and comprise a larger percentage of our total Core cash collections.

Bankruptcy Operations

Our bankruptcy department manages customer filings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on debtor accounts derived from three sources; (1) PRA’s Core purchased pools of charged off accounts that have filed for bankruptcy protection after being acquired by us, (2) our purchased pools of bankrupt accounts, and (3) our third party servicing client relationships. On PRA owned accounts, we file proofs of claim (“POCs”) or claim transfers and actively manage these accounts through the entire life cycle of the bankruptcy proceeding in order to substantiate our claims and ensure that we participate in any distributions to creditors. On accounts managed under a third party relationship, we work on either a full service contingency fee basis or a menu style fee-for-service basis; this is not a significant portion of our bankruptcy operations.

We developed our proprietary Bankruptcy Management System (“BMS”) as a secure and highly automated platform for providing bankruptcy notification services, filing POCs and claim transfers, managing documents, administering our case load, posting and reconciling payments and providing customized reports. BMS is a robust system designed to manage claims processing and case management in a high volume environment. The system is highly flexible and its capacity is easily expanded. Daily processing volumes are managed to meet individual bar dates associated with each bankruptcy case and specific client turnaround times. BMS and its underlying business rules were developed with emphasis first on minimizing risks through strict compliance to the bankruptcy code, and then on maximizing recoveries from automated claim filing and case administration.

Each of our bankruptcy department employees goes through an entry level training program to familiarize them with BMS and the bankruptcy process, including a general overview of how we interact with the courts, debtors' attorneys and trustees. We also use a tiered process of cross training designed to familiarize advancing employees with a variety of operational assignments and analytical tasks. For example, we utilize specially trained employees to perform advanced data matching and analytics for clients, while others are tasked with resolving objections directly with attorneys and trustees. In rare circumstances, resolution of these objections may need to be effectuated by working through our network of local counsel.

Fee-for-Service Businesses

Through our subsidiaries, we provide fee-based services, including vehicle location, skip tracing and collateral recovery services for auto lenders, governments and law enforcement via our PLS subsidiary; revenue administration, audit, and discovery/recovery services for government entities through our PGS business; class action claims recovery services and related payment processing through our CCB subsidiary and contingent fees earned on the collection of finance receivables from our PRA UK subsidiary.

PLS, through call center operations, performs national skip tracing, asset location and collateral recovery services, principally for auto finance companies, for a fee. In addition, PLS locates clients’ inventories for a fee with a fleet of cars equipped with

license plate recognition cameras. The amount of fee earned is generally dependent on several different outcomes: whether the debtor was found and a resolution on the account occurred, if the collateral was repossessed or if payment was made by the debtor to the debt owner.

PGS primarily derives its revenue from servicing taxing authorities in several different ways, including processing their tax payments and tax forms, collecting delinquent taxes, identifying taxes that are not being paid and auditing tax payments. The processing and collection services are standard commission based billings or fee-for-service transactions. When audits are conducted, there are two components. The first is a charge for the hours incurred on conducting the audit, based on a contractual billing rate. The gross billing amount based on the aforementioned billing rate is a component of the line item “Fee income” while the salary expense is included in the line item “Compensation and employee services.” The second item is for expenses incurred while conducting the audit. Most jurisdictions will reimburse us for direct expenses incurred for the audit including such items as travel and meals. The billed amounts are included in the line item “Fee income” and the expense component is included in its appropriate expense category, generally, “Other operating expenses.”

CCB derives its revenues from filing claims on behalf of institutional investors, retailers, manufacturers, and other businesses. CCB’s process allows clients to maximize settlement recoveries, in many cases participating in settlements they would otherwise not know existed. CCB charges fees for its services and works with clients to identify, prepare and submit claims to class action administrators charged with disbursing class action settlement funds. In addition, we purchase the rights to existing and future class action claims identified by CCB.

PRA UK generates revenue from both purchased finance receivables which is accounted for similarly to our Core operations and also services finance receivables on a contingent fee basis. These latter receivables are owned by our clients and placed under a contingent fee commission arrangement. Our subsidiary is paid to collect funds from the client's debtors and earns a commission generally expressed as a percentage of the gross collections amount. The "Fee income" line of our income statement reflects the contingent fee amount earned, and not the gross collection amount.

Competition

We face competition in both of the markets we serve - purchased portfolio and fee-for-service receivables management. Purchased portfolio competition comes from other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, third-party contingent fee collection agencies and debt owners that manage their own defaulted consumer receivables rather than outsourcing them. Fee-for-service competition comes from new and existing providers of outsourced receivables management services. Debt sellers have become more cautious recently, preferring to sell to experienced portfolio purchasers that have portfolio evaluation expertise sufficient to price portfolios and that maintain compliance with all applicable regulations. These trends effectively constitute significant barriers for successful entry for new purchased portfolio receivables companies. The receivables management industry (both owned portfolio and contingent fee) remains highly fragmented and competitive. There are few significant barriers for entry to new providers of contingent fee receivables management services and, consequently, the number of agencies serving the contingent fee market may continue to grow.

We face bidding competition in our acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in obtaining placements from fee-for-service receivables. We also compete on the basis of reputation, industry experience and performance. Among the positive factors which we believe influence our ability to compete effectively in this market are our ability to bid on portfolios at appropriate prices, our reputation from previous transactions regarding our ability to close transactions in a timely fashion, our relationships with originators of defaulted consumer receivables, our team of well-trained collectors who provide quality customer service and compliance with applicable collections laws and our ability to efficiently and effectively collect on various asset types. Competitors that have substantially greater financial, personnel and other resources, greater adaptability to changing market needs, longer operating histories, or more established relationships in our industry than we currently have, could influence our ability to compete effectively.

Information Technology

Technology Operating Systems and Server Platform

The architecture and design of our systems provides us with a technology system that is flexible, secure, reliable and redundant to provide for the protection of our sensitive data. We utilize Intel-based servers running Microsoft Windows 2003/2008 operating systems. Our desktop PCs run the Windows XP or Windows 7 operating system. In addition, we utilize a blend of purchased and proprietary software systems tailored to the needs of our business. These systems are designed to eliminate inefficiencies in our collections and continue to meet business objectives in a changing environment.

Network Technology

To provide delivery of our applications, we employ server network architecture to support high-speed data transport. Our network system is designed to be scalable and meet expansion and inter-building bandwidth and quality of service demands.

Database and Software Systems

The ability to access and utilize data is essential to us being able to operate in a cost-effective manner. Our centralized computer-based information systems support the core processing functions of our business under a set of integrated databases and are designed to be scalable to accommodate our internal growth. This integrated approach helps to assure that data sources are processed efficiently. We use these systems for portfolio and client management, skip tracing, check taking, financial and management accounting, reporting, and planning and analysis. We use a combination of Microsoft and Oracle database software to manage our portfolios and financial, customer and sales data. PGS, PLS, PRA UK and CCB all maintain unique, proprietary software systems that manage the movement of data, accounts and information throughout these business units.

Redundancy, System Backup, Security and Disaster Recovery

Our data centers provide the infrastructure for collection services and uninterrupted support of data, applications and hardware for all of our business units. We believe our facilities and operations include sufficient redundancy, file back-up and security to ensure minimal exposure to systems failure or unauthorized access. The preparations in this area include the use of data centers in Virginia, Tennessee and London, U.K. in order to help provide redundancy for data and processes should one site be completely disabled. We have a disaster recovery plan covering our business that is tested on a periodic basis. The combination of our locally distributed call control systems provides enterprise-wide call and data distribution between our call centers for efficient portfolio collection and business operations. In addition to data replication between the sites, differential backups of both software and databases are performed on a daily basis and a full system backup is performed weekly. Backup data tapes are stored at an off-site location along with copies of schedules and production control procedures, procedures for recovery using an off-site data center, and documentation and other critical information necessary for recovery and continued operation. Our Virginia headquarters has two separate telecommunications feeds, uninterruptible power supplies and natural gas and diesel-generators, all of which provide a level of redundancy should a power outage or interruption occur. We also have generators installed at each of our domestic call centers, as well as our subsidiary locations in Alabama, California and Nevada. We also employ rigorous physical and electronic security to protect our data. Our call centers have restricted card key access and appropriate additional physical security measures. Electronic protections include data encryption, firewalls and multi-level access controls.

Display Screens for Real Time Data Utilization

We utilize multiple plasma displays at most of our collection facilities to aid in recovery of portfolios. The displays provide real-time business-critical information to our collection personnel for efficient collection efforts such as telephone, production, employee status, goal trending, training and corporate information.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we employed approximately 3,500 persons on a full-time basis in the United States and the United Kingdom. None of our employees are represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are positive.

Collection Personnel

Our collectors are critical to the success of our debt collection business as a majority of our Core portfolio collection efforts occur as a result of telephone contact with customers. We have found that the tenure and productivity of our collectors are directly related. Therefore, attracting, hiring, training, retaining and motivating our collection personnel is a major focus for us. We pay our collectors competitive wages and offer employees a full benefits program. In addition to a base wage, we provide collectors with the opportunity to receive compensation through an incentive compensation program that pays bonuses above a set monthly base, based upon each collector’s collection and compliance results. Compliance failures may cause them to lose incentive pay that they would have otherwise earned; those payments may be distributed to other collection staff with outstanding compliance records. This program is designed to ensure that employees are paid based not only on performance, but also on consistency, quality and compliance.

We believe that we offer a competitive and, in many cases, a higher base wage than many local employers and therefore have access to a large number of eligible personnel in each of our call center locations.

Collections Training

We provide a comprehensive multi-week training program for all new owned portfolio collectors. Our training program begins with lectures on collection techniques, local, state and federal collection laws, systems, negotiation skills, skip tracing and telephone use. These sessions are then followed by additional weeks of practical instruction, including conducting live calls with additional managerial supervision in order to provide employees with confidence and guidance while still contributing to our profitability. Each trainee must successfully pass a comprehensive examination before being assigned to the collection floor, as well as once a year thereafter. Where permissible, we employ sophisticated call and work action recording systems which allow us to better monitor compliance and quality of customer contacts. This, in turn, allows us to offer additional training in areas of deficiency to increase productivity and compliance.

Each of our bankruptcy department employees goes through an entry level training program to familiarize them with BMS and the bankruptcy process, including a general overview of how we interact with the courts, debtor’s attorneys and trustees. We also use a tiered process of cross training designed to familiarize advancing employees with a variety of operational assignments and analytical tasks. For example, we utilize specially trained employees to perform advanced data matching and analytics for clients, while others are tasked with resolving objections directly with attorneys and trustees. In rare circumstances, resolution of these objections may need to be effectuated by working through our network of local counsel.

Office of General Counsel

Our Office of General Counsel manages general corporate governance; litigation; insurance; corporate and commercial transactions; intellectual property; contract and document preparation and review; compliance with federal securities laws and other applicable regulations and statutes; business acquisitions; and dispute and complaint resolution.

Compliance

As a part of its compliance functions, our Office of General Counsel works with our office of internal audit and our compliance department in the implementation of our Code of Ethics and our Compliance Policy. Our Code of Ethics is available at the Investor Relations page of our website at www.portfoliorecovery.com. We have implemented company-wide compliance training for our employees and directors, ethics training and annual compliance testing, and have established a confidential telephone hotline and email and web-based portals to report suspected policy violations, fraud, embezzlement, deception in record keeping and reporting, accounting, auditing matters and other acts which are inappropriate, criminal and/or unethical. Our compliance department regularly audits and tests business processes and internal practices. This practice of regular internal monitoring and auditing assists in identifying compliance risks and detecting and preventing any deviations from policy. In order to ensure that our employees carry out their job responsibilities in a complaint way, our Office of General Counsel advises our employees on compliance with the laws and regulations that govern the various industries and markets within which the Company operates and provides our operations personnel and our training department with summaries and updates concerning changes in federal and state statutes and relevant case law so that they are aware of and in compliance with the laws and judicial decisions that may impact their job duties.

Regulation

Federal, state, and local statutes establish specific guidelines and procedures which debt collectors must follow when collecting customer accounts. It is our policy to comply with the provisions of all applicable federal laws and corresponding state and local statutes in all of our activities. Our failure to comply with these laws could have an adverse effect on us in the event and to the extent that they apply to some or all of our activities. Federal, state and local consumer protection, privacy and related laws and regulations extensively regulate the relationship between debt collectors and debtors, and the relationship between customers and credit card issuers. Significant federal laws and regulations applicable to our business as a debt collector include the following:

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. This act imposes certain obligations and restrictions on the practices of debt collectors, including specific restrictions regarding communications with customers, including the time, place and manner of the communications. This act also gives consumers certain rights, including the right to dispute the validity of their obligations and a right to sue debt collectors who fail to comply with its provisions, including the right to recover their attorney fees.

Fair Credit Reporting Act. This act places certain requirements on credit information providers regarding the verification of the accuracy of information provided to credit reporting agencies and investigating consumer disputes concerning the accuracy of such information. We provide information concerning our accounts to the three major credit reporting agencies, and it is our practice to correctly report this information and to investigate credit reporting disputes. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act to include additional duties applicable to data furnishers with respect to information

in the consumer's credit file that the consumer identifies as resulting from identity theft, and requires that data furnishers have procedures in place to prevent such information from being furnished to credit reporting agencies.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. This act requires that certain financial institutions, including collection agencies, develop policies to protect the privacy of consumers' private financial information and provide notices to consumers advising them of their privacy policies. This act also requires that if private personal information concerning a consumer is shared with another unrelated institution, the consumer must be given an opportunity to opt out of having such information shared. Since we do not share consumer information with non-related entities, except as required by law, or except as needed to collect on the receivables, our consumers are not entitled to any opt-out rights under this act. This act is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which has retained exclusive jurisdiction over its enforcement, and does not afford a private cause of action to consumers who may wish to pursue legal action against a financial institution for violations of this act.

Electronic Funds Transfer Act. This act regulates the use of the Automated Clearing House ("ACH") system to make electronic funds transfers. All ACH transactions must comply with the rules of the National Automated Check Clearing House Association ("NACHA") and Uniform Commercial Code §3-402. This act, the NACHA regulations and the Uniform Commercial Code give the consumer, among other things, certain privacy rights with respect to electronic fund transfer transactions, the right to stop payments on a pre-approved fund transfer, and the right to receive certain documentation of the transaction. This act also gives consumers a right to sue institutions which cause financial damages as a result of their failure to comply with its provisions.

Telephone Consumer Protection Act. In the process of collecting accounts, we use a variety of methods to communicate with our customers. This act and similar state laws place certain restrictions on users of certain automated dialing equipment and pre-recorded messages that place telephone calls to consumers.

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 was amended in December 2003 as the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”). The SCRA gives U.S. military service personnel relief from credit obligations they may have incurred prior to entering military service, and may also apply in certain circumstances to obligations and liabilities incurred by a servicemember while serving on active duty. The SCRA prohibits creditors from taking specified actions to collect the defaulted accounts of servicemembers. The SCRA impacts many different types of credit obligations, including installment contracts and court proceedings, and tolls the statute of limitations during the time that the servicemember is engaged in active military service. The SCRA also places a cap on interest bearing obligations of servicemembers to an amount not greater than 6% per year, inclusive of all related charges and fees.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) provides standards to protect the confidentiality of patients' personal healthcare and financial information. Pursuant to HIPAA, business associates of health care providers, such as agencies which collect healthcare receivables, must comply with certain privacy and security standards established by HIPAA to ensure that the information provided will be safeguarded from misuse. This act is enforced by the Department of Health and Human Services and does not afford a private cause of action to consumers who may wish to pursue legal action against an institution for violations of this act.

U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In order to prevent any collection activity with bankrupt debtors by creditors and collection agencies, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides for an automatic stay, which prohibits certain contacts with consumers after the filing of bankruptcy petitions. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code also dictates what types of claims will or will not be allowed in a bankruptcy proceeding and how such claims may be discharged.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. On July 21, 2010 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) became law, and along with it, the unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”) provisions included therein. The Dodd-Frank Act restructured the regulation and supervision of the financial services industry and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the "CFPB”), with rulemaking, supervisory, and enforcement authority over larger consumer debt collectors. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the CFPB to have the authority to adopt rules describing specified acts and practices as being “unfair,” “deceptive,” or “abusive,” and hence unlawful. The ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business cannot be determined at this time.

U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act. Our operations outside the United States are subject to the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits United States companies and their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in order to obtain an unfair advantage, to help, obtain or retain business. Violations of these laws and related rules and regulations can result in the imposition of significant civil and criminal fines, penalties and sanctions.

Additionally, there are some state statutes and regulations comparable to the above federal laws, and specific licensing requirements which affect our operations. State laws may also limit credit account interest rates and fees, as well as limit the time frame in which judicial and non-judicial actions may be undertaken.

Some of the following laws, which apply principally to credit originators, may also affect our operations to some extent:

• Truth in Lending Act;

• Fair Credit Billing Act; and

• Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

Federal laws which regulate credit originators require, among other things, that credit card issuers disclose to consumers the interest rates, fees, grace periods and balance calculation methods associated with their credit card accounts. Consumers are entitled under current laws to have payments and credits applied to their accounts promptly, to receive prescribed notices and to require billing errors to be resolved promptly. Some laws prohibit discriminatory practices in connection with the extension of credit. Federal statutes further provide that, in some cases, consumers cannot be held liable for, or their liability is limited with respect to, charges to the credit card account that were a result of an unauthorized use of the credit card. These laws, among others, may give consumers a legal cause of action against us, or may limit our ability to recover amounts owing with respect to the receivables, whether or not we committed any wrongful act or omission in connection with the account. If the credit originator fails to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations, it could create claims and rights for consumers that could reduce or eliminate their obligations to repay the account and have a possible adverse effect on us.

Accordingly, when we acquire defaulted consumer receivables, typically we contractually require credit originators to indemnify us against any losses caused by their failure to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations relating to the receivables before they are sold to us.

The U.S. Congress and several states have enacted legislation concerning identity theft. Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted in the U.S and the U.K. that would impose additional requirements on the enforcement of and recovery on consumer credit card or installment accounts. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as existing consumer protection and privacy protection laws, may adversely affect our ability to recover the receivables. In addition, our failure to comply with these requirements could adversely affect our ability to enforce the receivables.

We cannot assure you that some of our receivables were not established as a result of identity theft or unauthorized use of a credit card. In the event that a receivable was established as a result of identity theft or unauthorized use, we could not recover the amount of the defaulted consumer receivables. As a purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables, we may acquire receivables subject to legitimate defenses on the part of the consumer. Typically our account purchase contracts allow us to return to the debt owners certain defaulted consumer receivables that may not be collectible, due to these and other circumstances. Upon return, the debt owners are required to compensate us or replace the receivables with similar receivables or repurchase the receivables. These provisions limit to some extent our losses on such accounts.

In addition to our obligation to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, we are also obligated to comply with judicial decisions reached in court cases involving legislation passed by any such governmental bodies.

As a result of our acquisition of PRA UK and its subsidiaries, we are subject to regulatory oversight under the Financial Services Act (the "FSA"), which became effective in April 2013. The FSA modified the U.K. financial services regulatory structure, creating a new regulatory framework for the supervision and management of the financial services industry, and transferring consumer accredit regulation from the Office of Fair Trading to the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulatory Authority. We must also comply with the provisions of the Data Protection Act of 1998 and licensure requirements specific to our operations in the United Kingdom.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in our Company involves risk, including the possibility that the value of the investment could fall substantially. The following are risks that could materially affect our financial results and condition, and the value of, and return on, an investment in our Company.

A prolonged economic recovery or a deterioration in the economic or inflationary environment in the United States or Europe, particularly in the United Kingdom, may have an adverse effect on our collections, results of operations, revenue and stock price.

Our performance may be affected by economic or inflationary conditions in the United States and Europe, particularly in the United Kingdom. Economic conditions in the United States and Europe may be impacted by domestic conditions or by global political and economic conditions such as the sovereign debt crises experienced in several European countries. There are currently concerns regarding the action or inaction of the United States government relating to the federal debt ceiling, the federal deficit and government spending cuts. For example, the United States domestic economy may be negatively impacted if the Congress does not pass legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling. Deterioration in economic conditions, a prolonged economic recovery, or a significant rise in inflation could cause personal bankruptcy filings to increase, and the ability of consumers to pay their debts could be adversely affected. This may in turn adversely impact our financial results. Deteriorating economic conditions or a prolonged recovery could also adversely impact businesses and governmental entities to which we provide fee-based services, which could reduce our fee income and cash flow. Other factors associated with the economy that could influence our performance include the financial stability of the lenders on our line of credit, our access to capital and credit, and financial factors affecting consumers.

The financial turmoil which affected the banking system and financial markets in recent years resulted in a tightening in credit markets. There could be a number of follow-on effects from the financial turmoil on our business, including a decrease in the value of our financial investments and the insolvency of lending institutions, including the lenders on our line of credit, resulting in our inability to obtain credit. These and other economic factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to continually replace our defaulted consumer receivables with additional receivables portfolios sufficient to operate efficiently and profitably, and/or we may not be able to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices.

To operate profitably, we must acquire and service a sufficient amount of defaulted consumer receivables to generate revenue that exceeds our expenses. Fixed costs such as salaries and lease or other facility costs constitute a significant portion of our overhead and, if we do not replace the defaulted consumer receivables portfolios we service with additional portfolios, we may have to reduce the number of our collection personnel. We would then have to rehire collection staff if we subsequently obtain additional defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. These practices could lead to:


•	low employee morale;


•	fewer experienced employees;


•	higher training costs;


•	disruptions in our operations;


•	loss of efficiency; and


•	excess costs associated with unused space in our facilities.

The availability of receivables portfolios at prices which generate an appropriate return on our investment depends on a number of factors both within and outside of our control, including the following:


•	the continuation of high levels of consumer debt obligations;


•	sales of defaulted receivables portfolios by debt owners; and


•	competitive factors affecting potential purchasers and credit originators of receivables.

Furthermore, heightened regulation of the credit card and consumer lending industry or changing credit origination strategies may result in decreased availability of credit to consumers, potentially leading to a future reduction in defaulted consumer receivables available for purchase from debt owners. We cannot predict how our ability to identify and purchase receivables and

the quality of those receivables would be affected if there were a shift in consumer lending practices, whether caused by changes in the regulations or accounting practices applicable to debt owners, a sustained economic downturn or otherwise.

Moreover, there can be no assurance that our existing or potential clients will continue to sell their defaulted consumer receivables at recent levels or at all, or that we will be able to continue to offer competitive bids for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. If we are unable to expand our business or adapt to changing market needs as well as our current or future competitors, we may experience reduced access to defaulted consumer receivables portfolios at appropriate prices and reduced profitability.

Because of the length of time involved in collecting defaulted consumer receivables on acquired portfolios and the variability in the timing of our collections, we may not be able to identify trends and make changes in our purchasing strategies in a timely manner.

A portion of our collections depends on success in individual lawsuits. Additionally, in pursuing legal collections, we may be unable to obtain accurate and authentic account documents for accounts that we purchase, and despite our quality control measures, we cannot be certain that all of the documents we provide are error free.

A portion of our collections on accounts is achieved through the legal channel. Accordingly, a percentage of our future collections is dependent on success in individual lawsuits, and a portion of those are dependent on the success of third party attorney firms. In addition, when we collect accounts judicially, courts in certain jurisdictions require that a copy of certain account documents be attached to the pleadings in order to obtain a judgment against the account debtors. If we are unable to produce accurate and authentic account documents, these courts will deny our claims. We rely on the seller of accounts that we purchase to fulfill its contractual obligation, if applicable, to provide account documents to us in an accurate and timely fashion. Additionally, we rely on our employees to produce accurate and authentic documents. Our inability to obtain these documents from the seller, or our own errors in producing account documents, may negatively impact the liquidation rate on such accounts that are subject to judicial collections. Additionally, our ability to collect non-judicially may be negatively impacted by state laws which require that certain types of account documentation be in our possession prior to the institution of any collection activities.

We may not be able to collect sufficient amounts on our defaulted consumer receivables to fund our operations.

Our business primarily consists of acquiring and liquidating receivables that consumers have failed to pay and that the credit originator has deemed uncollectible and has charged-off. The debt owners have typically made numerous attempts to recover on their defaulted consumer receivables, often using a combination of in-house recovery efforts and third-party collection agencies. These defaulted consumer receivables are difficult to collect and we may not collect a sufficient amount to cover our investment associated with purchasing the defaulted consumer receivables and the costs of running our business.

We may not be successful at acquiring and collecting receivables of new asset types.

We may pursue the acquisition of receivables portfolios of asset types in which we have little current experience. We may not be successful in completing acquisitions of receivables of these asset types and our limited experience in these asset types may impair our ability to collect on these receivables. This may cause us to pay too much for these receivables and, consequently, we may not generate a profit from these receivables portfolio acquisitions.

Our collections may decrease if certain types of bankruptcy filings involving liquidations increase.

Various economic trends and potential changes to existing legislation may contribute to an increase in the amount of personal bankruptcy filings. Under certain bankruptcy filings a debtor's assets may be sold to repay creditors, but because the defaulted consumer receivables we service are generally unsecured we often would not be able to collect on those receivables. We cannot ensure that our collections would not decline with an increase in personal bankruptcy filings or changes in bankruptcy regulations or practices. If our actual collection experience with respect to a defaulted bankrupt consumer receivables portfolio is significantly lower than we projected when we purchased the portfolio, our financial condition and results of operations could deteriorate.

Our ability to collect on portfolios of bankrupt consumer receivables may be impacted by changes in, or interpretations of, federal laws or changes in the administrative practices of the various bankruptcy courts.

We file claims in bankruptcy courts on consumer receivables in which consumers have filed for bankruptcy protection under available U.S. bankruptcy laws. We receive payments from the courts on consumer receivables which become bankrupt after we acquire them, and we also purchase accounts that are currently in bankruptcy proceedings. Our ability to collect on portfolios of bankrupt consumer receivables may be impacted by changes in, or interpretations of, federal laws or changes in administrative practices of the various bankruptcy courts.

Our ability to collect and enforce our finance receivables may be limited under federal and state laws.

The businesses conducted by PRA's operating subsidiaries are subject to licensing and regulation by governmental and regulatory bodies in the many jurisdictions in which we operate and conduct our business. Federal and state laws may limit our ability to collect and enforce our defaulted consumer receivables regardless of any act or omission on our part. Some laws and regulations applicable to credit issuers may preclude us from collecting on defaulted consumer receivables we purchase if the credit issuer previously failed to comply with applicable laws in generating or servicing those receivables. Collection laws and regulations also directly apply to our business. Such laws and regulations are extensive and subject to change. Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose additional requirements on the enforcement of and collection on consumer credit receivables. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as existing consumer protection and privacy protection laws, or changes in the ways that existing rules or laws are interpreted or enforced, may adversely affect our ability to collect on our defaulted consumer receivables and may harm our business. In addition to the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) noted below, federal, state and local governmental bodies are also considering, and may consider in the future, legislative proposals that would regulate the collection of our defaulted consumer receivables. Further, certain tax laws could negatively impact our ability to collect or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although we cannot predict if or how any future legislation would impact our business, our failure to comply with any current or future laws or regulations applicable to us could limit our ability to collect on our defaulted consumer receivables, which could reduce our profitability and harm our business.

Failure to comply with existing and new government regulation of the collections industry could result in penalties, fines, litigation, damage to our reputation or the suspension or termination of our ability to conduct our business.

The collections industry is governed by various U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as by laws and regulations in the U.K. Many states regulate our business and require us to be a licensed debt collector. Our industry is also at times investigated by regulators and offices of state attorneys general, which could lead to enforcement actions, fines and penalties, or the assertion of private claims and law suits against us. The Federal Trade Commission has the authority to investigate consumer complaints against debt collection companies and to recommend enforcement actions and seek monetary penalties. As discussed below, our debt collection activities are also subject to supervision and enforcement action by the CFPB. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, such failure could result in penalties, litigation losses and expenses, damage to our reputation, or the suspension or termination of our ability to conduct collections, which would adversely affect our financial results and condition. In addition, new federal and state or local laws or regulations or changes in the ways that existing rules or laws are interpreted or enforced could limit our activities in the future or significantly increase the cost of compliance. Furthermore, judges or regulatory bodies could interpret current rules or laws differently than the way we do, leading to such adverse consequences described above. If it is asserted that we failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations, such failure could result in penalties, litigation losses and expenses, damage to our reputation, or the suspension or termination of our ability to conduct collections, which would adversely affect our financial results and condition.

Changes in governmental laws and regulations could increase our costs and liabilities or impact our operations.

Changes in laws and regulations or the manner in which they are interpreted or applied may alter our business environment. This could affect our results of operations or increase our liabilities. These negative impacts could result from changes in collection laws, laws related to credit reporting, laws related to consumer bankruptcy, accounting standards, taxation requirements, employment laws and communications laws, among others. For example, we know that federal and state governments are currently reviewing existing laws related to debt collection, in order to determine if any changes are needed.

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Reform Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) became law. The Dodd-Frank Act restructures the regulation and supervision of the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act created a new independent regulator, the CFPB. The CFPB has rulemaking, supervisory, and enforcement and other authorities relating to consumer financial products and services, including debt collection, provided by covered persons. We are subject to the CFPB’s supervisory and enforcement authority.

The CFPB has rulemaking authority with respect to significant federal statutes that impact the debt collection industry, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. As a result, the CFPB has the authority to adopt regulations that interpret the FDCPA, potentially impacting the manner in which we conduct our debt collection business. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the CFPB to take action against a covered person in regard to an unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice and to adopt rules describing specified acts and practices as being “unfair,” “deceptive,” or “abusive.”

In October 2012, the CFPB issued a rule that became effective on January 2, 2013, which subjects entities that qualify as larger participants of the consumer debt collection market to a higher level of supervision by the CFPB. Entities that have more than $10 million in annual receipts from consumer debt collection activities, as defined in the rule, are subject to this additional authority. Under this authority, we are subject to examination and supervision by the CFPB. We may in the future be subject to registration and reporting requirements imposed by the CFPB.

If we become subject to additional costs or liabilities in the future resulting from our supervision or examination by the CFPB, or by changes in, or additions to laws and regulations, that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Investigations or enforcement actions by governmental authorities may result in changes to our business practices; negatively impact our portfolio purchasing volume; make collection of account balances more difficult or expose us to the risk of fines, penalties, restitution payments and litigation.

Our business practices may be subject to review from time to time by various governmental authorities. These reviews may involve governmental authority consideration of individual consumer complaints, or could involve a broader review of our debt collection policies and practices. Such investigations could lead to assertions by governmental authorities that we are not complying with applicable laws or regulations. In such circumstances, authorities may request or seek to impose a range of remedies that could involve potential compensatory or punitive damage claims, fines, restitutionary payments, sanctions or injunctive relief, that if agreed to or granted, could require us to make payments or incur other expenditures that could have an adverse effect on our financial position. Government authorities could also request or seek to require us to cease certain of our practices or institute new practices. We may also elect to change practices that we believe are compliant with applicable law and regulations in order to respond to the concerns of governmental authorities. Such changes in practices could negatively impact our results of operations. Negative publicity relating to investigations or proceedings brought by governmental authorities could have an adverse impact on our reputation, could harm our ability to conduct business with industry participants, and could result in financial institutions reducing or eliminating sales of portfolios to us which would harm our business and negatively impact our financial results. Moreover, responding to governmental inquiries and investigations and defending lawsuits or other proceedings could require significant expenditures and could divert management’s attention from our business operations. All of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our international operations expose us to additional risks which could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

In 2012, we acquired PRA UK, a United Kingdom debt collection and purchase group, and we intend to expand our international operations in the future. We have limited operating experience in international markets. In addition to risks described elsewhere in this section, our international operations expose us to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:


•	changes in local political, economic, social and labor conditions in Europe, particularly in the United Kingdom;


•	foreign exchange controls that might prevent us from repatriating cash earned in countries outside the United States;


•	currency exchange rate fluctuations and our ability to manage these fluctuations through a foreign exchange risk management program;


•	different employee/employer relationships, laws and regulations and existence of employment tribunals;


•	laws and regulations imposed by foreign governments, including those relating to governing data security, sharing and transfer;


•	potentially adverse tax consequences resulting from changes in tax laws in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate; and


•	logistical, communications and other challenges caused by distance and cultural differences, making it harder to do business in certain jurisdictions.

Any one of these factors could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations could increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions.

Compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations could increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions. These laws and regulations include anti-corruption laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the UK Bribery Act of 2010 and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, and those related to taxation. The FCPA, and similar antibribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit U.S.-based companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The U.K. Bribery Act 2010 prohibits certain entities from making improper payments to governmental officials and to commercial entities. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties; criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees; prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, and could also adversely affect our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors or agents will not violate our policies.

Exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

Because we conduct business in currencies other than U.S. dollars but report our financial results in U.S. dollars, we face exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. As a result, significant fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies may adversely affect our net income. We may or may not implement a hedging program related to currency exchange rate fluctuations. Additionally, if implemented, such hedging programs could expose us to additional risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our potential acquisition of Aktiv Kapital AS exposes us to risks which could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

On February 19, 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire the equity of Aktiv Kapital AS (“Aktiv”). Aktiv is a Norway-based company specializing in the acquisition and servicing of non-performing consumer loans throughout Europe and Canada. It maintains in-house servicing platforms in eight markets, and owns portfolios in fifteen markets.

The announcement and pendency of the acquisition could cause disruptions in and create uncertainty surrounding our business. In addition, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant costs in connection with this acquisition and we have diverted, and will continue to divert, significant management resources in an effort to complete the acquisition. This could have a negative impact on our ability to manage our existing operations or pursue alternative strategic transactions, which could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2014 upon successful completion of customary closing conditions, including approval of the transaction by applicable competition authorities and our ability to obtain the necessary financing to consummate the transaction. No assurances can be given that we will be able to close this transaction on the terms and conditions contemplated by the agreement executed on February 19, 2014, in accordance with the anticipated timing or at all. If the transaction is not consummated, investors could react negatively and could become concerned about our growth prospects over the next several years, which could negatively impact the price of our common stock.

We expect to finance this transaction with a combination of cash, seller financing, funding from our domestic revolving credit facility, and by accessing an accordion feature on our credit facility. Additionally, we have agreed to guarantee Aktiv’s current corporate debt. Furthermore, if we are not able to obtain the additional financing that we expect to obtain, it may be necessary for us to raise alternative funds, potentially at a much higher cost and on less advantageous terms. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to obtain the financing necessary to consummate the transaction on favorable terms or at all.

As a result of the financing of this transaction, we expect our debt to increase significantly, both in terms of the total amount of our borrowings and as a percentage of the equity of the combined company. This increase in our indebtedness could increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, make it more difficult for us to satisfy obligations with respect to our indebtedness, require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service payments on our debt, limit our flexibility to react to changes in our business and the industry in which we operate, place us at a competitive disadvantage with our competitors that have less debt and limit our ability to borrow additional funds.

Integrating the operations of Aktiv successfully with our current operations or otherwise realizing the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Aktiv involves a number of challenges. We may not successfully integrate the operations of Aktiv with our current operations, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition to the extent, or in the timeframe anticipated, or at all. The failure to successfully integrate the operations of Aktiv with our existing operations or to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Other than our existing UK business, PRAUK, which we acquired in 2012, we have limited operating experience in international markets. If consummated, this international acquisition expands the risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this section, including the following:


•	changes in local political, economic, social and labor conditions in Europe and Canada;


•	foreign exchange controls that might prevent us from repatriating cash earned in countries outside the United States;


•	currency exchange rate fluctuations and our ability to manage these fluctuations through a foreign exchange risk management program;


•	different employee/employer relationships, laws and regulations and existence of employment tribunals;


•	laws and regulations imposed by foreign governments, including those relating to governing data security, sharing and transfer;


•	potentially adverse tax consequences resulting from changes in tax laws in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate; and


•	logistical, communications and other challenges caused by distance and cultural differences, making it harder to do business in certain jurisdictions.

Any one of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Goodwill or other intangible asset impairment could negatively impact our net income and stockholders' equity.

Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. There are numerous risks that may cause the fair value of a reporting unit to fall below its carrying amount, which could lead to the recognition of goodwill impairment. These risks include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in macroeconomic conditions, the business climate, or the market for the entity's products or services; significant variances between actual and expected financial results; negative or declining cash flows; lowered expectations of future results; failure to realize anticipated synergies from acquisitions; significant expense increases; a more likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing all or a portion of a reporting unit; the loss of key personnel; a sustained decline in the Company's market capitalization; and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator.

Other intangible assets, such as client and customer relationships, non-compete agreements and trademarks, are amortized. Risks, such as those that could lead to the recognition of goodwill impairment, could also lead to the recognition of other intangible asset impairment.

A loss of customers in our fee-for-service businesses could negatively affect our operations.

Our fee-for-service customers, in general, may terminate their relationship with us on 30 to 90 days' prior notice. In the event a customer or customers terminate or significantly cut back any relationship with us, it could reduce our profitability and harm our business. Additionally, with respect to the acquisitions of our fee businesses, a significant portion of the valuation of such business was attributed to existing client and customer relationships. Therefore, a loss of customers in these businesses could give rise to an impairment charge related to intangible assets specifically ascribed to existing client and customer relationships.

Our senior management team is important to our continued success and the loss of one or more members of senior management could negatively affect our operations.

The loss of the services of one or more of our key executive officers or key employees could disrupt our operations. We have employment agreements with our Chief Executive Officer and several of our other senior executives. The current agreements contain non-compete provisions that survive termination of employment. However, these agreements do not and will not assure the continued services of these officers and we cannot ensure that the non-compete provisions will be enforceable. Our success depends on the continued service and performance of our key executive officers, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain those individuals.

Our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the stability of our operations and increase our costs.

Currently, none of our employees are represented by unions. However, our U.S. employees have the right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to form or affiliate with a union. If some of our workforce were to become unionized and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement were significantly different from our current compensation arrangements, it could adversely affect the stability of our work force and increase our costs.

We experience high employee turnover rates and we may not be able to hire and retain enough sufficiently trained employees to support our operations.

The receivables management industry is very labor intensive and, similar to other companies in our industry, we typically experience a high rate of employee turnover. We experience higher productivity with more seasoned collectors. We compete for qualified personnel with companies in our industry and in other industries. Our growth requires that we continually hire and train new collectors. A higher turnover rate among our collectors will increase our recruiting and training costs and limit the number of experienced collection personnel available to service our Core defaulted consumer receivables. If this were to occur, we would not be able to service our Core defaulted consumer receivables effectively and this would reduce our ability to continue our growth and operate profitably.

We may not be able to retain, renegotiate or replace our credit facility.

Our credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount of $630.5 million which consists of a $195.0 variable rate term loan and a $435.5 million revolving facility that both mature on December 19, 2017. If we are unable to retain, renegotiate or replace our credit facility, our growth could be adversely affected, which could negatively impact liquidity and our business operations.

We incurred additional indebtedness in the form of Convertible Senior Notes.

In August 2013, we completed a private offering of $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”). Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance our indebtedness, including the Notes, or to make cash payments in connection with any conversion of the Notes depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our indebtedness and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring indebtedness or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at that time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.

We may not be able to continue to satisfy the restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt.

The agreements governing our debt impose a number of covenants, including restrictive covenants on how we operate our business. Failure to satisfy any one of these covenants could result in negative consequences including the following, each of which could have an adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to conduct business:


•	acceleration of outstanding indebtedness;


•	exercise by our lenders of rights with respect to the collateral pledged under certain of our outstanding indebtedness;


•	our inability to continue to purchase receivables needed to operate our business; or


•	our inability to secure alternative financing on favorable terms, if at all.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to repurchase the Notes upon a fundamental change or to settle conversions in cash.

Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, in the event the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, holders of the Notes will be entitled to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. Upon a conversion of Notes, unless we elect to deliver solely shares of our common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional shares of our common stock), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the Notes. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of Notes surrendered therefor or to settle conversions in cash and our ability to repurchase the Notes or pay cash upon conversion may be limited by law.

The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Notes, could have an adverse effect on our reported financial results.

We follow the guidance of ASC 470-20, "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" (“ASC 470-20”). Under ASC 470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of the convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of ASC 470-20 on the accounting for the Notes is that the equity component is required to be included in the additional paid-in capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component is treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Notes. As a result, we are required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense in current periods presented as a result of the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the Notes to their face amount over the term of the Notes. We will report lower net income in our financial results because ASC 470-20 will require interest to include both the current period’s amortization of the debt discount and the instrument’s coupon interest, which could adversely affect our reported or future financial results, the trading price of our common stock and the trading price of the Notes.

In addition, under certain circumstances, convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash are currently accounted for utilizing the treasury stock method, the effect of which is that the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share except to the extent that the conversion value of the Notes exceeds their respective principal amount. Under the treasury stock method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, the transaction is accounted for as if the number of shares of common stock that would be necessary to settle such excess, if we elected to settle such excess in shares, are issued. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the treasury stock method. If we are unable to use the treasury stock method in accounting for the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes, then our diluted earnings per share could be adversely affected.

Conversion of the Notes may affect the price of our common stock.

The conversion of some or all of the Notes may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders to the extent we deliver shares of common stock upon conversion. Holders of the Notes will be able to convert them only upon the satisfaction of certain conditions prior to February 1, 2020. Upon conversion, holders of the Notes will receive cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, at our election. Any sales in the public market of shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Notes could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Changes in interest rates could increase our interest expense and reduce our net income. Our future hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with changes in interest rates and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as could our failure to comply with hedge accounting principles and interpretations.

Our revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable rate. Increases in interest rates could increase our interest expense which would, in turn, lower our earnings. From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions to mitigate our interest rate risk on a portion of our credit facility. Hedging strategies rely on assumptions and projections. If these assumptions and projections prove to be incorrect or our hedges do not adequately mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates, we may experience volatility in our earnings that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We had no interest rate hedge contracts at December 31, 2013.

In addition, hedge accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” requires the application of significant subjective judgments to a body of accounting concepts that is complex and for which the interpretations have continued to evolve within the accounting profession and among the standard-setting bodies. Our failure to comply with hedge accounting principles and interpretations in the future could result in the loss of the applicability of hedge accounting which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Additional taxes levied on us could harm our financial results.

PRA is subject to taxes in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. PRA's future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws or their interpretation. Any of these changes could have an adverse effect on PRA's profitability. The determination of the worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may adversely affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

Our tax filings are subject to audit by domestic and foreign tax authorities. These audits may result in assessments of additional taxes, adjustments to the timing of taxable income or deductions or allocations of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in our favor, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We file domestic income tax returns using the cost recovery method for tax revenue recognition as it relates to our debt purchasing business. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has audited and issued a Notice of Deficiency for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. It has asserted that cost recovery for tax revenue recognition does not clearly reflect taxable income and that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. We have filed a petition in the United States Tax Court and believe we have sufficient support for the technical merits of our positions and that it is more-likely-than-not that they will ultimately be sustained; therefore, a reserve for uncertain tax positions is not necessary. If we are unsuccessful in the United States Tax Court, we can appeal to the federal Circuit Court of Appeals. If judicial appeals prove unsuccessful, we may ultimately be required to pay the related deferred taxes, any potential interest, and penalties, possibly requiring additional financing from other sources. The deferred tax liability related to revenue recognition on our debt purchasing business is $209.3 million at December 31, 2013. On June 30, 2011, we were notified by the IRS that the audit period was expanded to include the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The statute of limitations for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax years has been extended to September 26, 2014.

For financial reporting purposes, we utilize the interest method of revenue recognition for determining our income recognized on finance receivables, which is based on an analysis of projected cash flows that may prove to be less than anticipated and could lead to reductions in future revenues or the incurrence of allowance charges.

We utilize the interest method to determine income recognized on finance receivables under the guidance of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”). Under this method, static pools of receivables we acquire are modeled upon their projected cash flows. A yield is then established which, when applied to the unamortized purchase price of the receivables, results in the recognition of income at a constant yield relative to the remaining balance in the pool. Each static pool is analyzed regularly to assess the actual performance compared to that expected by the model. Significant increases in expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively, through an upward adjustment of the yield, over a pool's remaining life. If a valuation allowance had been previously recognized for that pool, the allowance is reversed before recording any prospective yield adjustments. Any increase to the yield then becomes the new benchmark for future impairment testing for the pool. Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the estimated yield if the collection estimates are not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to maintain the then current yield and is shown as a reduction in revenue in the consolidated income statements with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting finance receivables, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. As a result, if the accuracy of the modeling process deteriorates or there is a significant decline in anticipated future cash flows, we could incur reductions in future revenues resulting from additional allowance charges, which could reduce our profitability in a given period.

Our loss contingency accruals may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

We are involved in judicial, regulatory, and arbitration proceedings or investigations concerning matters arising from our business activities. We have adopted reasonable compliance procedures and believe we have meritorious defenses in all material litigation pending against us; however, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome. We establish accruals for potential liability arising from legal proceedings when it is probable that such liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We may still incur legal costs for a matter even if we have not accrued a liability. In addition, actual losses

may be higher than the amount accrued for a certain matter, or in the aggregate. An unfavorable resolution of a legal proceeding or claim could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. For more information, refer to the “Litigation” section of Note 14 (Commitments and Contingencies).

Class action suits and other litigation could divert our management’s attention from operating our business and increase our expenses.

Originators, debt purchasers and third-party collection agencies and attorneys in the consumer credit industry are frequently subject to putative class action lawsuits and other litigation. Claims include failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations and improper or deceptive origination and servicing practices. Being a defendant in such class action lawsuits or other litigation could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on our systems, including our telecommunications and computers systems, and employees, and certain failures or disruptions could adversely affect the continuity of our business operations.

We may be subject to disruptions of our operating systems arising from events that are not entirely within our control. Those events may include, for example, terrorist attacks, war and the outcome of war and threats of attacks; computer viruses; electrical or telecommunications outages; natural disasters; computer hacking attacks; malicious employee acts; other intentional destructive human acts; and disease pandemics. We could be subject to both private and public legal actions if consumer information stored in our systems is lost or misappropriated, as we are subject to extensive laws and regulations concerning the use and safeguarding of this information. Any or all of these occurrences could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, our success depends in large part on sophisticated telecommunications and computer systems. The temporary or permanent loss of our computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems, through casualty or operating malfunction, could disrupt our operations. In the normal course of our business, we must record and process significant amounts of data quickly and accurately to access, maintain and expand the databases we use for our collection activities. Any failure of our information systems or software and our backup systems would interrupt our business operations and harm our business. Our headquarters are located in a region that is susceptible to hurricane damage, which may increase the risk of disruption of information systems and telephone service for sustained periods.

Further, our business depends heavily on services provided by various local and long distance telephone companies. A significant increase in telephone service costs or any significant interruption in telephone services could reduce our profitability or disrupt our operations and harm our business.

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cyber-security, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption in our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information or damage to our Company's image, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional or unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. Our three primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident are operational interruption, damage to our image, and private data exposure. Private data may include customer information or proprietary business information such as underwriting and collections methodologies. We have implemented solutions, processes, and procedures to help mitigate these risks, but these measures, as well as our organization's increased awareness of our risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

We serve markets that are highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete with businesses that may have greater resources than us.

We face competition in the markets we serve from new and existing providers of outsourced receivables management services, including other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, contingent fee businesses and debt owners that manage their own defaulted consumer receivables rather than outsourcing them. The receivables management industry is highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of thousands of consumer and commercial agencies, most of which compete in the contingent fee business.

We face bidding competition in our acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in our placement of fee based receivables, and we also compete on the basis of reputation, industry experience and performance. Some of our current competitors

and possible new competitors may have substantially greater financial, personnel and other resources, greater adaptability to changing market needs, longer operating histories and more established relationships in our industry than we currently have. Moreover, our competitors may elect to pay prices that we determine are not reasonable and, in that event, our volume of purchases may be diminished. In the future, we may not have the resources or ability to compete successfully. As there are few significant barriers for entry to new providers of fee based receivables management services, there can also be no assurance that additional competitors with greater resources than ours will not enter the market.

We may make business acquisitions that prove unsuccessful or strain or divert our resources.

Through acquisitions, we may enter markets in which we have no or limited experience. Further, acquisitions may place additional constraints on our resources by diverting the attention of our management team from other business concerns. Moreover, any acquisition may result in a potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities or may result in the incurrence of additional debt and amortization expenses of related intangible assets, which could reduce our profitability and harm our business.

We intend to consider acquisitions of companies that could complement our business, including the acquisition of entities offering greater access and expertise in other asset types and markets that are related but that we do not currently serve. We may not be able to successfully operate future acquired entities, or integrate these businesses with our own, and we may be unable to maintain our standards, controls and policies.

We may not be able to manage our growth effectively.

We have expanded significantly since our formation and we intend to maintain our focus on growth. However, our growth will place additional demands on our resources and we cannot ensure that we will be able to manage our growth effectively. In order to successfully manage our growth, we may need to:


•	expand and enhance our administrative infrastructure;


•	continue to improve our management, financial and information systems and controls; and


•	recruit, train, manage and retain our employees effectively.

Continued growth could place a strain on our management, operations and financial resources. We cannot ensure that our infrastructure, facilities and personnel will be adequate to support our future operations or to effectively adapt to future growth. If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

The market price of our shares of common stock could fluctuate significantly.

Wide fluctuations in the trading price or volume of our shares of common stock could be caused by many factors, including factors relating to our company or to investor perception of our company (including changes in financial estimates and recommendations by research analysts), but also factors relating to (or relating to investor perception of) the receivables management industry, debt collection or the economy in general.

Negative publicity or reputational attacks could damage our reputation and our business.

From time to time there are negative news stories about our industry or company, especially with respect to alleged conduct in collecting debt from customers. Internet sites are maintained where consumers can list their concerns about the activities of debt collectors and seek guidance from other website posters on how to handle the situation. Advertisements by debt relief attorneys and credit counseling centers are becoming more common, adding to the negative attention given to our industry. Negative public opinion about our alleged or actual debt collection practices or about the debt collection industry, including those expressed via television, newspapers, radio, or social media such as blogs, websites or newsletters, regardless of the factual accuracy of the assertions, could adversely impact our stock price and our ability to retain and attract customers and employees and customers may be more reluctant to pay their debts and more likely to pursue legal action against us regardless of whether those actions are warranted. Furthermore, such negative publicity could result in financial institutions reducing or eliminating sales of portfolios to us which would harm our business and negatively impact our financial results.

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that may prevent or delay a change of control or that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain provisions that may make it more difficult, expensive or otherwise discourage a tender offer or a change in control or takeover attempt by a third-party, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders. The existence of these provisions may have a negative impact on the price of our common stock by discouraging third-party investors from purchasing our common stock. In particular, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions that:


•	classify our board of directors into three groups, each of which will serve for staggered three-year terms;


•	permit a majority of the stockholders to remove our directors only for cause;


•	permit our directors, and not our stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors;


•	require stockholders to give us advance notice to nominate candidates for election to our board of directors or to make stockholder proposals at a stockholders’ meeting;


•	permit a special meeting of our stockholders to be called only by approval of a majority of the directors, the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the written request of holders owning at least 30% of our common stock;


•	permit our board of directors to issue, without approval of our stockholders, preferred stock with such terms as our board of directors may determine;


•	permit the authorized number of directors to be changed only by a resolution of the board of directors; and


•	require the vote of the holders of a majority of our voting shares for stockholder amendments to our by-laws.

In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which provides certain restrictions on business combinations between us and any party acquiring a 15% or greater interest in our voting stock other than in a transaction approved by our board of directors and, in certain cases, by our stockholders. These provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our by-laws and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control, even if our stockholders support such proposals. Moreover, these provisions could diminish the opportunities for stockholders to participate in certain tender offers, including tender offers at prices above the then-current market value of our common stock, and may also inhibit increases in the trading price of our common stock that could result from takeover attempts or speculation.

The sudden collapse of one of the financial institutions in which we are depositors could negatively affect our financial results.

We maintain depository accounts with financial institutions for daily cash flow needs. With the elimination of unlimited FDIC coverage on depository accounts at the end of 2012, we have exposure with certain financial institutions to the extent our cash balances exceed the current $250,000 in maximum coverage. If one of the financial institutions in which we have significant deposits in excess of $250,000 were to collapse suddenly, we could potentially be unable to retrieve our deposits and therefore incur significant losses relating to the lost deposits. This could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters and primary operations facility are located in Norfolk, Virginia. Our leased PRA UK subsidiary facility is located in Kilmarnock, Scotland. In addition, we have operational centers, all of which are leased except the facilities in Kansas and Tennessee, in the following locations in the United States:

- Birmingham, Alabama - Hutchinson, Kansas

- Conshohocken, Pennsylvania - Jackson, Tennessee

- North Richland Hills, Texas - Lake Forest, California

- Fresno, California - Las Vegas, Nevada

- Hampton, Virginia - Rosemont, Illinois

- Houston, Texas - San Diego, California

We also lease several less significant facilities in various locations throughout the United States which are not listed above. We do not consider any specific leased or owned facility to be material to our operations. We believe that equally suitable alternative facilities are available in all areas where we currently do business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are from time to time subject to routine legal claims and proceedings, most of which are incidental to the ordinary course of our business. We initiate lawsuits against customers and are occasionally countersued by them in such actions. Also, customers, either individually, as members of a class action, or through a governmental entity on behalf of customers, may initiate litigation against us in which they allege that we have violated a state or federal law in the process of collecting on an account. From time to time, other types of lawsuits are brought against us.

No legal proceedings were commenced during the period covered by this report that the Company believes could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Refer to Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” of our Consolidated Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for information regarding legal proceedings in which we are involved.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Price Range of Common Stock

The Company's common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PRAA.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales price for the Company's common stock, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, for the periods indicated.



2012	High	Low
Quarter ended March 31, 2012	$24.69	$20.04
Quarter ended June 30, 2012	$30.45	$21.63
Quarter ended September 30, 2012	$35.39	$26.73
Quarter ended December 31, 2012	$35.67	$30.63



2013	High	Low
Quarter ended March 31, 2013	$42.59	$33.68
Quarter ended June 30, 2013	$54.62	$38.97
Quarter ended September 30, 2013	$61.60	$45.83
Quarter ended December 31, 2013	$63.96	$49.88

As of February 18, 2014, there were 77 holders of record of the Company's common stock. Based on information provided by our transfer agent and registrar, we believe that there were approximately 39,253 beneficial owners of the Company's common stock as of January 16, 2014.

Stock Performance

The following graph compares from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2013, the cumulative stockholder returns assuming an initial investment of $100 in the Company's common stock at the beginning of the period, the stocks comprising the NASDAQ Global Market Composite Index, the NASDAQ Market Index (U.S.) and the stocks comprising a peer group index consisting of six peers which includes Encore Capital Group, Inc., Asta Funding, Inc., Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (formerly Compucredit Holdings Corporation), FTI Consulting Inc. and EPIQ Systems Inc. The prior year graph included Asset Acceptance Capital Corp., which merged with Encore Capital Group, Inc. during 2013. Any dividends paid during the five year period are assumed to be reinvested.



	As of December 31,
	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	100	$	133	$	222	$	200	$	316	$	468
NASDAQ Market Index (U.S.)	$	100	$	144	$	167	$	168	$	199	$	277
NASDAQ Global Market Composite Index	$	100	$	145	$	173	$	150	$	173	$	289
Custom Peer Group	$	100	$	107	$	102	$	102	$	99	$	133

The comparisons of stock performance shown above are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of PRA’s common stock. PRA does not make or endorse any predictions as to its future stock performance.

Dividend Policy

Our board of directors sets our dividend policy. We do not currently pay regular dividends on our common stock and did not pay dividends in 2013 or 2012; however, our board of directors may determine in the future to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. Under the terms of our credit facility, cash dividends may not exceed $20 million in any fiscal year without the consent of our lenders. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may consider relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans see Note 10 "Share-Based Compensation" of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Share Repurchase Program

On February 2, 2012, the Company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program to purchase up to $100,000,000 of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. There were no purchases of the Company's common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section below, the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation.



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	$	663,546		$	530,635		$	401,895		$	309,680		$	215,612
Fee income	71,589			62,166			57,040			63,026			65,479
Total revenues	735,135			592,801			458,935			372,706			281,091
Operating expenses:
Compensation and employee services	192,474			168,356			138,202			124,077			106,388
Legal collection fees	41,488			34,393			23,621			17,599			14,872
Legal collection costs	83,063			72,325			38,659			31,330			16,462
Agent fees	5,901			5,906			7,653			12,012			15,644
Outside fees and services	31,615			28,867			19,310			12,554			9,570
Communications	28,936			25,943			20,874			15,152			12,828
Rent and occupancy	7,536			6,781			5,891			5,313			4,761
Depreciation and amortization	14,385			14,515			12,943			12,437			9,213
Other operating expenses	25,809			19,651			14,914			12,370			10,744
Impairment of goodwill	6,397			—			—			—			—
Total operating expenses	437,604			376,737			282,067			242,844			200,482
Gain on sale of property	—			—			1,157			—			—
Income from operations	297,531			216,064			178,025			129,862			80,609
Interest income	3			10			7			65			3
Interest expense	(14,469		)	(9,041		)	(10,569		)	(9,052		)	(7,909		)
Income before income taxes	283,065			207,033			167,463			120,875			72,703
Provision for income taxes	106,146			80,934			66,319			47,004			28,397
Net income	176,919			126,099			101,144			73,871			44,306
Adjustment for net (income)/loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	(1,605		)	494			(353		)	(417		)	—
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	175,314		$	126,593		$	100,791		$	73,454		$	44,306
Net income per share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc:
Basic	$3.48			$2.48			$1.96			$1.46			$0.96
Diluted	$3.45			$2.46			$1.95			$1.45			$0.96
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic	50,366			50,991			51,330			50,460			46,260
Diluted	50,873			51,369			51,690			50,655			46,362
OPERATING AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash receipts	$	1,214,026		$	970,852		$	762,530		$	592,368		$	433,482
Operating expenses to cash receipts	36		%	39		%	37		%	41		%	46		%
Return on equity ⁽¹⁾	22		%	20		%	19		%	17		%	14		%
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at cost ⁽²⁾	$	656,784		$	538,545		$	408,408		$	367,443		$	288,889
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at face value ⁽²⁾	$	7,860,096		$	6,154,973		$	9,792,357		$	6,804,952		$	8,109,694
Employees at period end	3,543			3,221			2,641			2,473			2,213


(1)	Calculated by dividing net income for each year by average monthly stockholders’ equity for the same year.


(2)	Represents cash paid for finance receivables. It does not include certain capitalized costs or buybacks. It also does not include the finance receivables acquired as part of the initial acquisition of PRA UK in 2012.

Below are listed certain key balance sheet data for the periods presented:



	As of December 31,
	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009
(In thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,004	$	32,687	$	26,697	$	41,094	$	20,265
Finance receivables, net	1,239,191		1,078,951		926,734		831,330		693,462
Total assets	1,601,232		1,288,956		1,071,123		995,908		794,433
Borrowings	451,780		327,542		221,246		320,396		320,799
Total stockholders’ equity	869,476		708,427		595,488		490,516		335,480

Below are listed the quarterly consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:



	For the Quarter Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013			Sept. 30, 2013			June 30, 2013			Mar. 31, 2013			Dec. 31, 2012			Sept. 30, 2012			June 30, 2012			Mar. 31, 2012
(In thousands, except per share data)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Revenues:
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	$	168,728		$	171,456		$	168,570		$	154,792		$	138,068		$	135,754		$	132,587		$	124,226
Fee income	16,125			26,306			14,391			14,767			16,183			14,765			15,298			15,920
Total revenues	184,853			197,762			182,961			169,559			154,251			150,519			147,885			140,146
Operating expenses:
Compensation and employee services	46,393			52,882			48,202			44,997			44,849			41,334			42,479			39,694
Legal collection fees	10,144			10,206			10,609			10,529			9,153			8,635			8,988			7,617
Legal collection costs	20,044			19,801			22,717			20,501			14,619			15,810			18,227			23,669
Agent fees	1,608			1,404			1,280			1,609			1,411			1,545			1,323			1,627
Outside fees and services	6,827			8,707			8,634			7,447			7,292			10,131			5,584			5,860
Communications	7,537			6,645			6,675			8,079			6,255			5,996			6,195			7,496
Rent and occupancy	2,075			1,950			1,824			1,687			1,728			1,786			1,656			1,611
Depreciation and amortization	3,732			3,753			3,534			3,366			3,681			3,623			3,555			3,656
Other operating expenses	8,143			6,549			5,660			5,457			5,274			4,601			5,282			4,495
Impairment of goodwill	—			6,397			—			—			—			—			—			—
Total operating expenses	106,503			118,294			109,135			103,672			94,262			93,461			93,289			95,725
Income from operations	78,350			79,468			73,826			65,887			59,989			57,058			54,596			44,421
Interest income	3			—			—			—			2			—			7			1
Interest expense	(4,862		)	(3,995		)	(2,923		)	(2,689		)	(1,818		)	(2,189		)	(2,381		)	(2,653		)
Income before income taxes	73,491			75,473			70,903			63,198			58,173			54,869			52,222			41,769
Provision for income taxes	27,714			26,262			27,489			24,681			22,441			21,742			20,171			16,580
Net income	45,777			49,211			43,414			38,517			35,732			33,127			32,051			25,189
Adjustment for net (income)/loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—			(1,873		)	185			83			70			187			(36		)	273
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	45,777		$	47,338		$	43,599		$	38,600		$	35,802		$	33,314		$	32,015		$	25,462
Net income per share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc:
Basic	$	0.92		$	0.94		$	0.86		$	0.76		$	0.71		$	0.66		$	0.63		$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.91		$	0.93		$	0.85		$	0.75		$	0.70		$	0.65		$	0.62		$	0.49
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic	49,750			50,154			50,751			50,801			50,649			50,643			51,081			51,588
Diluted	50,375			50,660			51,183			51,273			51,216			51,066			51,399			51,801

Below are listed the quarterly consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:



	Quarter Ended as of:
(Dollars in thousands)	Dec. 31, 2013		Sept. 30, 2013		June 30, 2013			Mar. 31, 2013			Dec. 31, 2012		Sept. 30, 2012		June 30, 2012		Mar. 31, 2012
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,004	$	108,705	$	43,459		$	39,111		$	32,687	$	31,488	$	42,621	$	28,068
Finance receivables, net	1,239,191		1,256,822		1,236,859			1,169,747			1,078,951		973,594		966,508		945,242
Accounts receivable, net	12,359		12,047		10,421			9,234			10,486		8,417		8,580		9,107
Income taxes receivable	11,710		2,708		2,487			—			—		—		—		—
Property and equipment, net	31,541		28,059		27,278			25,470			25,312		25,506		26,016		26,369
Deferred tax asset	1,361		—		—			—			—		—		—		—
Goodwill	103,843		102,891		106,953			106,912			109,488		100,456		99,384		97,480
Intangible assets, net	15,767		16,746		17,396			18,550			20,364		21,167		22,364		27,179
Other assets	23,456		20,007		12,393			13,715			11,668		9,070		8,265		8,581
Total assets	$	1,601,232	$	1,547,985	$	1,457,246		$	1,382,739		$	1,288,956	$	1,169,698	$	1,173,738	$	1,142,026
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	14,819	$	14,446	$	9,356		$	12,590		$	12,155	$	10,234	$	10,508	$	10,915
Accrued expenses	27,655		33,023		29,600			20,283			18,953		11,197		6,859		7,852
Income taxes payable	—		740		—			22,349			3,125		7,359		8,468		16,688
Accrued compensation	27,431		20,454		14,552			9,260			12,804		13,241		11,588		6,854
Net deferred tax liability	210,071		200,109		187,730			185,772			185,277		186,506		190,639		194,286
Borrowings	451,780		452,229		413,774			371,159			327,542		250,674		292,849		265,936
Total liabilities	731,756		721,001		655,012			621,413			559,856		479,211		520,911		502,531
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		10,336		10,336			10,336			20,673		19,998		19,381		18,783
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock	498		498		507			510			507		507		507		516
Additional paid in capital	729,505		129,570		156,574			159,256			150,878		149,480		147,543		165,789
Retained earnings	135,441		683,728		636,390			592,791			554,191		518,389		485,075		453,060
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)	4,032		2,852		(1,573		)	(1,567		)	2,851		2,113		321		1,347
Total stockholders’ equity	869,476		816,648		791,898			750,990			708,427		670,489		633,446		620,712
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,601,232	$	1,547,985	$	1,457,246		$	1,382,739		$	1,288,956	$	1,169,698	$	1,173,738	$	1,142,026

Below are certain key financial data and ratios as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS



	2013			2012			2011
EARNINGS (in thousands)
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	$	663,546		$	530,635		$	401,895
Fee income	71,589			62,166			57,040
Total revenues	735,135			592,801			458,935
Operating expenses	437,604			376,737			282,067
Income from operations	297,531			216,064			178,025
Net interest expense	14,467			9,031			10,562
Net income	176,919			126,099			101,144
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	175,314			126,593			100,791
PERIOD-END BALANCES (in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,004		$	32,687		$	26,697
Finance receivables, net	1,239,191			1,078,951			926,734
Goodwill and intangible assets, net	119,610			129,852			76,274
Total assets	1,601,232			1,288,956			1,071,123
Borrowings	451,780			327,542			221,246
Total liabilities	731,756			559,856			457,804
Total equity	869,476			708,427			595,488
FINANCE RECEIVABLE COLLECTIONS (dollars in thousands)
Cash collections	$	1,142,437		$	908,684		$	705,490
Cash collections on fully amortized pools	35,520			28,972			36,929
Principal amortization without allowance charges	480,912			371,497			293,431
Principal amortization with allowance charges	478,890			378,049			303,595
Principal amortization w/ allowance charges as % of cash collections:
Including fully amortized pools	41.9		%	41.6		%	43.0		%
Excluding fully amortized pools	43.3		%	43.0		%	45.4		%
ALLOWANCE FOR FINANCE RECEIVABLES (dollars in thousands)
Allowance (reversal)/charge	$	(2,022	)	$	6,552		$	10,164
Allowance (reversal)/charge to period-end net finance receivables	(0.20		)%	0.61		%	1.10		%
Allowance (reversal)/charge to net finance receivable income	(0.30		)%	1.23		%	2.53		%
Allowance (reversal)/charge to cash collections	(0.20		)%	0.72		%	1.44		%
PURCHASES OF FINANCE RECEIVABLES (dollars in thousands)
Cash paid—core	$	395,068		$	259,795		$	213,389
Face value—core	4,704,609			3,581,246			7,900,762
Cash paid—bankruptcy	242,649			262,630			195,019
Face value—bankruptcy	2,814,044			2,104,977			1,891,595
Cash paid—other	19,067			16,120			—
Face value—other	341,443			468,750			—
Purchase price—total	656,784			538,545			408,408
Face value—total	7,860,096			6,154,973			9,792,357
Number of portfolios—total	347			416			333
ESTIMATED REMAINING COLLECTIONS (in thousands)
Estimated remaining collections—core	$	1,824,132		$	1,387,711		$	1,159,086
Estimated remaining collections—bankruptcy	822,988			905,136			794,262
Estimated remaining collections—other	22,150			22,342			—
Estimated remaining collections—total	2,669,270			2,315,189			1,953,348
SHARE DATA (7) (share amounts in thousands)
Net income per common share—diluted	$	3.45		$	2.46		$	1.95
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—diluted	50,873			51,369			51,690
Shares repurchased	1,203			994			—
Average price paid per share repurchased (including acquisition costs)	$	48.62		$	22.85		$	—
Closing market price	$	52.84		$	35.62		$	22.51
RATIOS AND OTHER DATA (dollars in thousands)
Return on average equity (1)	22.2		%	19.6		%	18.5		%
Return on revenue (2)	24.1		%	21.3		%	22.0		%
Return on average assets (3)	11.9		%	10.8		%	9.7		%
Operating margin (4)	40.5		%	36.4		%	38.8		%
Operating expense to cash receipts (5)	36.0		%	38.8		%	37.0		%
Debt to equity (6)	52.0		%	46.2		%	37.2		%
Number of collectors	2,313			2,153			1,658
Number of employees	3,543			3,221			2,641
Cash receipts (5)	$	1,214,026		$	970,852		$	762,530
Line of credit—unused portion at period end	435,500			273,000			187,500

(1) Calculated as net income divided by average equity for the year.

(2) Calculated as net income divided by total revenues.

(3) Calculated as net income divided by average assets for the year.

(4) Calculated as income from operations divided by total revenues.

(5) "Cash receipts" is defined as cash collections plus fee income.

(6) For purposes of this ratio, "debt" equals the line of credit balance plus long-term debt plus convertible debt.

(7) Share data has been adjusted to reflect the three-for-one stock split by means of a stock dividend which was declared on June 10, 2013 and

paid August 1, 2013.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

PRA is a financial and business services company. Our primary business is the purchase, collection and management of portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. We also service receivables on behalf of clients on either a commission or transaction-fee basis as well as providing class action claims settlement recovery services and related payment processing to our corporate clients.

PRA is headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia, and employs approximately 3,500 people. The shares of PRA are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PRAA.”

On February 19, 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire the equity of Aktiv Kapital AS (“Aktiv”), a Norway-based company specializing in the acquisition and servicing of non-performing consumer loans throughout Europe and in Canada, for approximately $880 million, we also agreed to assume approximately $435 million of Aktiv's corporate debt, resulting in an acquisition of estimated total enterprise value of $1.3 billion. This acquisition will provide us entry into thirteen new markets, providing us additional geographical diversity in portfolio purchasing and collection, and with entry into new growth markets. We expect Aktiv's Chief Executive Officer and his executive team and the more than 400 Aktiv employees to join our workforce upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2014, upon successful completion of customary closing conditions, including approval of the transaction by applicable competition authorities and our ability to obtain the necessary financing to consummate the transaction.

We expect to finance this transaction with a combination of cash, $170 million of seller financing, $435 million from our domestic revolving credit facility, and by accessing an accordion feature on our credit facility of up to $214 million. We may choose to use other debt instruments to expand, replace or pay down any of these financing options. We anticipate transaction costs of approximately $15 million, which we expect to incur between both the first and second quarters of 2014. Our total borrowings are projected to be approximately $1.8 billion after closing, compared to PRA’s total borrowings of $452 million at December 31, 2013.

A publicly traded company from 1997 until early 2012, Aktiv has developed a mixed in-house and outsourced collection strategy. It maintains in-house servicing platforms in eight markets, and owns portfolios in fifteen markets. Aktiv has more than 20 years of experience and data in a wide variety of consumer asset classes, across an extensive geographic background. Aktiv has acquired more than 2,000 portfolios, with a face value of more than $38 billion. In 2013, Aktiv collected $318 million on its portfolios and purchased $248 million in new portfolios, up from $222 million in 2012. Aktiv’s total assets were approximately $900 million at December 31, 2013.

Earnings Summary

For the year ended December 31, 2013, net income attributable to PRA was $175.3 million, or $3.45 per diluted share, compared with $126.6 million, or $2.46 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Total revenues were $735.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, up 24.0% from the same year ago period. Revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013 consisted of $663.5 million in income recognized on finance receivables, net of allowance charges, and $71.6 million in fee income. Income recognized on finance receivables, net of allowance charges, for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $132.9 million, or 25.1%, over 2012, primarily as a result of a significant increase in cash collections. Cash collections were $1,142.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, up 25.7% over $908.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, PRA recorded $2.0 million in net allowance charge reversals, compared with $6.6 million in net allowance charges in the year ended December 31, 2012. Our performance has been positively impacted by operational efficiencies surrounding the cash collections process, including the continued refinement of account scoring analytics as it relates to both legal and non-legal collection channels. Additionally, we have continued to develop our internal legal collection staff resources, which enables us to place accounts into that channel that otherwise would have been prohibitively expensive for legal action and to collect these accounts more efficiently and profitably.

Fee income increased from $62.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $71.6 million in 2013, primarily due to an increase in revenues generated by CCB and our PGS business. The increase in revenue from CCB is due primarily to larger distributions of class action settlements in the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. In particular, there was one large class action settlement which generated approximately $9.3 million in fee income. This was partially offset by declines in revenue at our PLS and PRA UK businesses. The decline from PLS is due primarily to the adverse impact of the economic slowdown on automobile financing and related collateral recovery activities. The decline in fee income from PRA UK is due primarily to a decline in the amount of contingent fee work provided to us by debt owners for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.

A summary of how our revenue was generated during the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:



(in thousands)	2013			2012			2011
Cash collections	$	1,142,437		$	908,684		$	705,490
Principal amortization	(480,913		)	(371,497		)	(293,431		)
Net allowance reversals/(charges)	2,022			(6,552		)	(10,164		)
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	663,546			530,635			401,895
Fee income	71,589			62,166			57,040
Total revenues	$	735,135		$	592,801		$	458,935

Operating expenses were $437.6 million for the year ended December, 31, 2013, up 16.2% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, due primarily to increases in compensation expense, legal collection costs, legal collection fees, other operating expenses and impairment of goodwill. Compensation expense increased primarily as a result of larger staff sizes, as well as an increase in share-based compensation expense and incentive and other performance based compensation incurred as a result of the overall strong Company performance. Compensation and employee service expenses increased as total employees grew 10.0% to 3,543 as of December 31, 2013 from 3,221 as of December 31, 2012. Legal collection costs were $83.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $72.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $10.8 million or 14.9%. This increase was the result of an increased portfolio size as well as a refinement of our internal scoring methodology that expanded our account selections for legal action. This strategy to expand the accounts brought into the legal collection process resulted in significant initial expenses, which may drive additional future cash collections and revenue. Legal collection fees increased from $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $41.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $7.1 million or 20.6%. This increase was the result of an increase in cash collections from outside attorneys from $157.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 to $192.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $34.6 million or 21.9%. Other operating expenses increased from $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $6.1 million or 31.0%. Of the $6.1 million increase, $4.1 million is related to the additional expense incurred as a result of the earn-out provision of the asset purchase agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of certain finance receivables and operating assets of National Capital Management ("NCM") in 2012 and $0.8 million is due to an increase in insurance expenses. None of the remaining $1.2 million increase was attributable to any significant identifiable items.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired finance receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $7.9 billion at a cost of $656.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, excluding the initial investment in the PRA UK portfolio, we acquired finance receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $6.2 billion at a cost of $538.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired finance receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $9.8 billion at a cost of $408.4 million. In any period, we acquire defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate collectability. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. In addition, market forces can drive pricing rates up or down in any period, irrespective of other quality fluctuations. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our particular buying activity in that period. However, regardless of the average purchase price and for similar time frames, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return, after direct expenses, in pricing our portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to the estimated profitability of a period's buying.

Results of Operations

The results of operations include the financial results of PRA and all of our subsidiaries, all of which are in the receivables management business. Under the guidance of the FASB ASC Topic 280 “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), we have determined that we have several operating segments that meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280, and therefore, we have one reportable segment, accounts receivables management, based on similarities among the operating units including homogeneity of services, service delivery methods and use of technology.

The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total revenues for the years indicated:



	2013					2012					2011
Revenues:
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	$	663,546		90.3	%	$	530,635		89.5	%	$	401,895		87.6	%
Fee income	71,589			9.7		62,166			10.5		57,040			12.4
Total revenues	735,135			100.0		592,801			100.0		458,935			100.0
Operating expenses:
Compensation and employee services	192,474			26.2		168,356			28.4		138,202			30.1
Legal collection fees	41,488			5.6		34,393			5.8		23,621			5.1
Legal collection costs	83,063			11.3		72,325			12.2		38,659			8.4
Agent fees	5,901			0.8		5,906			1.0		7,653			1.7
Outside fees and services	31,615			4.3		28,867			4.9		19,310			4.2
Communications	28,936			3.9		25,943			4.4		23,372			5.1
Rent and occupancy	7,536			1.0		6,781			1.1		5,891			1.3
Depreciation and amortization	14,385			2.0		14,515			2.4		12,943			2.8
Other operating expenses	25,809			3.5		19,651			3.3		12,416			2.7
Impairment of goodwill	6,397			0.9		—			—		—			—
Total operating expenses	437,604			59.5		376,737			63.5		282,067			61.4
Gain on sale of property	—			—		—			—		1,157			0.3
Income from operations	297,531			40.5		216,064			36.5		178,025			38.9
Interest income	3			0.0		10			0.0		7			0.0
Interest expense	(14,469		)	(2.0	)	(9,041		)	(1.5	)	(10,569		)	(2.3	)
Income before income taxes	283,065			38.5		207,033			35.0		167,463			36.6
Provision for income taxes	106,146			14.4		80,934			13.7		66,319			14.5
Net income	176,919			24.1	%	126,099			21.3	%	101,144			22.1	%
Adjustment for net (income)/loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	(1,605		)	(0.2	)	494			0.1		(353		)	(0.1	)
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	175,314		23.9	%	$	126,593		21.4	%	$	100,791		22.0	%

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Revenues

Total revenues were $735.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $142.3 million or 24.0% compared to total revenues of $592.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, net

Income recognized on finance receivables, net, was $663.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $132.9 million or 25.1% compared to income recognized on finance receivables, net, of $530.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash collections on our owned finance receivables to $1,142.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $908.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $233.7 million or 25.7%. Our finance receivables amortization rate, including net allowance charges, was 41.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 41.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Accretable yield represents the amount of income recognized on finance receivables the Company can expect to generate over the remaining life of its existing portfolios based on estimated future cash flows as of the balance sheet date. Additions represent the original expected accretable yield, on portfolios purchased during the period, to be earned by the Company based on its proprietary buying models. Net reclassifications from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield primarily result from the Company’s increase in its estimate of future cash flows. Increases in future cash flows may occur as portfolios age and actual cash collections exceed those originally expected. If those cash flows are determined to be incremental to the portfolio’s original forecast, future projections of cash flows are generally increased resulting in higher expected revenue and hence increases in accretable yield. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company reclassified amounts from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield due primarily to increased cash collection forecasts relating to pools acquired from 2009-2011. When applicable, net reclassifications to nonaccretable difference from accretable yield result from the Company’s decrease in its estimates of future cash flows and allowance charges that exceed the Company’s increase in its estimate of future cash flows.

Income recognized on finance receivables, net, is shown net of changes in valuation allowances recognized under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”), which requires that a valuation allowance be recorded for significant decreases in expected cash flows or a change in timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a reduction in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded net allowance charge reversals of $2.0 million, which consisted of net allowance charge reversals of $8.9 million on our Core portfolios, mainly on pools purchased between 2005 and 2008, offset by allowance charges of $6.9 million on purchased bankruptcy portfolios acquired mainly in 2007 and 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded net allowance charges of $6.6 million, $8.6 million of which related to purchased bankruptcy portfolios acquired mainly in 2007 and 2008, offset by a net reversal of $2.0 million on Core portfolios. In any given period, we may be required to record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables underperforming our previous expectations. Factors that may contribute to the recording of valuation allowances may include both internal as well as external factors. External factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently to the overall profitability, of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables include: new laws or regulations relating to collections, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the economy. Internal factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the overall profitability, of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include: necessary revisions to initial and post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal operational activities (relating to the collection and movement of accounts on both our collection floor and external channels), and decreases in productivity related to turnover of our collection staff.

Fee Income

Fee income was $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $9.4 million or 15.1% compared to fee income of $62.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Fee income increased primarily due to an increase in revenues generated by CCB and our PGS business. The increase in revenue from CCB is due primarily to larger distributions of class action settlements in the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. In particular, there was one large class action settlement which generated approximately $9.3 million in fee income. This was partially offset by declines in revenue at our PLS and PRA UK businesses. The decline from PLS is due primarily to the adverse impact of the economic slowdown on automobile financing and related collateral recovery activities. The decline in fee income from PRA UK is due primarily to a decline in the amount of contingent fee work provided to us by debt owners for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were $437.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $60.9 million or 16.2% compared to total operating expenses of $376.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Total operating expenses were 36.0% of cash receipts for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with 38.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Compensation and Employee Services

Compensation and employee service expenses were $192.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $24.1 million or 14.3% compared to compensation and employee service expenses of $168.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Compensation expense increased primarily as a result of larger staff sizes, as well as an increase in share-based compensation expense and incentive and other performance based compensation incurred as a result of the overall strong Company performance. Total employees grew 10.0% to 3,543 as of December 31, 2013 from 3,221 as of December 31, 2012. Additionally, some existing employees received appropriate salary increases based on performance. Compensation and employee service expenses as a percentage of cash receipts decreased to 15.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013 from 17.3% of cash receipts for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Legal Collection Fees

Legal collection fees represent contingent fees incurred for the cash collections generated by our independent third party attorney network. Legal collection fees were $41.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $7.1 million, or 20.6%, compared to legal collection fees of $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was the result of an increase in our external legal collections which increased $34.6 million or 21.9%, from $157.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $192.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Legal collection fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 were 3.4% of cash receipts, compared to 3.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Legal Collection Costs

Legal collection costs consist of costs paid to courts where a lawsuit is filed and the cost of documents paid to sellers of defaulted consumer receivables. Legal collection costs were $83.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $10.8 million, or 14.9%, compared to legal collection costs of $72.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Beginning in early 2012 and continuing into 2013, as a result of the refinement of our internal scoring methodology that expanded our account selections for legal action, we expanded the accounts brought into the legal collection process which resulted in significant initial expenses, which may continue to drive additional future cash collections and revenue. These legal collection costs represent 6.8% and 7.4% of cash receipts for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Agent Fees

Agent fees primarily represent costs paid to repossession agents to repossess vehicles. Agent fees were $5.9 million for both the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Outside Fees and Services

Outside fees and services expenses were $31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $2.7 million or 9.3% compared to outside fees and services expenses of $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Of the $2.7 million increase, $1.8 million was attributable to an increase in corporate legal expenses and the remaining $0.9 million increase was attributable to other outside fees and services including increases in non-capitalized software development costs.

Communications

Communications expenses were $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $3.0 million or 11.6% compared to communications expenses of $25.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to additional postage expense resulting from an increase in special letter campaigns. The remaining increase was mainly attributable to increased telephone expenses. Expenses related to customer mailings were responsible for 66.7% or $2.0 million of this increase, while the remaining 33.3% or $1.0 million was attributable to increased telephone and telecommunication related expenses.

Rent and Occupancy

Rent and occupancy expenses were $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $0.7 million or 10.3% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to the additional space leased at our Norfolk headquarters, the addition of NCM in December of 2012 as well as increased utility charges.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $0.1 million or 1.0% compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses were $25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $6.1 million or 31.0% compared to other operating expenses of $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Of the $6.1 million increase, $4.1 million is related to the additional expense incurred as a result of the earn-out provision of the NCM purchase agreement and $0.8 million is due to an increase in insurance expenses. None of the remaining $1.2 million increase was attributable to any significant identifiable items.

Impairment of Goodwill

Impairment of goodwill expense was $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2012. During the third quarter of 2013, we evaluated the goodwill associated with our PLS reporting unit, which had experienced a revenue and profitability decline, recent net losses and the loss of a significant client during the quarter. Based on this evaluation, we recorded a $6.4 million impairment of goodwill in the third quarter of 2013. This non-cash charge represents the full amount of goodwill previously recorded for PLS. All other intangible assets related to PLS were fully amortized as of September 30, 2013.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $5.5 million or 61.1% compared to interest expense of $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to the completion on August 13, 2013, through a private offering of $287.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020, as well as an increase in average borrowings under our credit facility for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The average borrowings on our credit facility were $309.7 million and $258.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $106.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $25.2 million or 31.2% compared to income tax expense of $80.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was mainly due to an increase of 36.7% in income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2013 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. This was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate to 37.5% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 39.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to state revenue apportionment changes and tax credits.

We intend for predominantly all foreign earnings to be permanently reinvested in our foreign operations. If foreign earnings were repatriated, we would need to accrue and pay taxes; however, foreign tax credits would be available to partially reduce U.S. income taxes. The amount of cash on hand related to foreign operations with permanently reinvested earnings is $5.4 million as of December, 31, 2013.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Revenues

Total revenues were $592.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $133.9 million or 29.2% compared to total revenues of $458.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, net

Income recognized on finance receivables, net, was $530.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $128.7 million or 32.0% compared to income recognized on finance receivables, net, of $401.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash collections on our owned finance receivables to $908.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $705.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $203.2 million or 28.8%. Our finance receivables amortization rate, including net allowance charges, was 41.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 43.0% for the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2012, excluding the initial investment in the PRA UK portfolio, we acquired finance receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $6.2 billion at a cost of $538.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired finance receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $9.8 billion at a cost of $408.4 million. In any period, we acquire defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate collectability. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. In addition, market forces can drive pricing rates up or down in any period, irrespective of other quality fluctuations. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our particular buying activity in that period. However, regardless of the average purchase price and for similar time frames, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return, after direct expenses, in pricing our portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to the estimated profitability of a period's buying.

Accretable yield represents the amount of income recognized on finance receivables the Company can expect to generate over the remaining life of its existing portfolios based on estimated future cash flows as of the balance sheet date. Additions represent the original expected accretable yield, on portfolios purchased during the period, to be earned by the Company based on its proprietary buying models. Net reclassifications from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield primarily result from the Company’s increase in its estimate of future cash flows. Increases in future cash flows may occur as portfolios age and actual cash collections exceed those originally expected. If those cash flows are determined to be incremental to the portfolio’s original forecast, future projections of cash flows are generally increased resulting in higher expected revenue and hence increases in accretable yield. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company reclassified amounts from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield due primarily to increased cash collection forecasts relating to pools acquired from 2009-2011 and 2009-2010, respectively. When applicable, net reclassifications to nonaccretable difference from accretable yield result from the Company’s decrease in its estimates of future cash flows and allowance charges that exceed the Company’s increase in its estimate of future cash flows.

Income recognized on finance receivables, net, is shown net of changes in valuation allowances recognized under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”), which requires that a valuation allowance be recorded for significant decreases in expected cash flows or a change in timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a reduction in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded net allowance charges of $6.6 million, $8.6 million of which related to purchased bankruptcy portfolios acquired mainly in 2007 and 2008, offset by a net reversal of $2.0 million on Core portfolios. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded net allowance charges of $10.2 million, $6.6 million of which related to Core portfolios acquired mainly in 2005 through 2008 and $3.6 million of which related to purchased bankruptcy portfolios acquired mainly in 2007 through 2008. In any given period, we may be required to record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables underperforming our expectations. Factors that may contribute to the recording of valuation allowances may include both internal as well as external factors. External factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently to the overall profitability, of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables include: new laws or regulations relating to collections, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the economy. Internal factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the overall profitability, of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include: necessary revisions to initial and post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal operational activities (relating to the collection and movement of accounts on both our collection floor and external channels), and decreases in productivity related to turnover of our collection staff.

Fee Income

Fee income was $62.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $5.2 million or 9.1% compared to fee income of $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Fee income increased primarily due to the acquisition of PRA UK in the first quarter of 2012. This increase was partially offset by declines in revenue generated by both our PLS and CCB businesses. The decline from PLS is due primarily to the adverse impact of the economic slowdown on automobile financing and related collateral recovery activities. The decline from CCB is due primarily to larger distributions of class action settlements in the year ended December 31,

2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. We anticipate, based on available data on hand at December 31, 2012, that CCB's fee income should increase in 2013. In particular, we believe there will likely be one large class action settlement which could generate approximately $4.0 to $6.0 million or more in fee income.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were $376.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $94.6 million or 33.5% compared to total operating expenses of $282.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Total operating expenses were 38.8% of cash receipts for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with 37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Compensation and Employee Services

Compensation and employee service expenses were $168.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $30.2 million or 21.9% compared to compensation and employee service expenses of $138.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Compensation expense increased primarily as a result of larger staff sizes, including the addition of new employees as a result of the acquisition of PRA UK on January 16, 2012, as well as an increase in share-based compensation expense. Total employees grew 22.0% to 3,221 as of December 31, 2012 from 2,641 as of December 31, 2011. Additionally, existing employees received normal salary increases. Compensation and employee service expenses as a percentage of cash receipts decreased to 17.3% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 18.1% of cash receipts for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Legal Collection Fees

Legal collection fees represent contingent fees incurred for the cash collections generated by our independent third party attorney network. Legal collection fees were $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $10.8 million, or 45.8%, compared to legal collection fees of $23.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was the result of an increase in our external legal collections which increased $51.5 million or 48.4%, from $106.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $157.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Legal collection fees for the year ended December 31, 2012 were 3.5% of cash receipts, compared to 3.1% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Legal Collection Costs

Legal collection costs consist of costs paid to courts where a lawsuit is filed and the cost of documents paid to sellers of defaulted consumer receivables. Legal collection costs were $72.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $33.6 million, or 86.8%, compared to legal collection costs of $38.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was the result of an increased portfolio size as well as a refinement of our internal scoring methodology that expanded our account selections for legal action. This strategy to expand the accounts brought into the legal collection process resulted in significant initial expenses, which may drive additional future cash collections and revenue. These legal collection costs represent 7.4% and 5.1% of cash receipts for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Agent Fees

Agent fees primarily represent costs paid to repossession agents to repossess vehicles. Agent fees were $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $1.8 million, or 23.4%, compared to agent fees of $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was mainly due to reduced business activity associated with PLS.

Outside Fees and Services

Outside fees and services expenses were $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $9.6 million or 49.7% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Of the $9.6 million increase, $8.1 million was attributable to an increase in legal reserve accruals and corporate legal expenses and the remaining $1.5 million increase was attributable to other outside fees and services including increases in non-capitalized software development costs.

Communications

Communications expenses were $25.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $5.0 million or 23.9% compared to communications expenses of $20.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to additional postage expense resulting from an increase in special letter campaigns. The remaining increase was mainly attributable to telephone expenses incurred by PRA UK. Expenses related to customer mailings were responsible for 84.0% or $4.2 million of this increase, while the remaining 16.0% or $0.8 million was attributable to increased telephone and telecommunication related expenses.

Rent and Occupancy

Rent and occupancy expenses were $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.9 million or 15.3% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the additional space leased for our Birmingham call center operations, the addition of our PRA UK foreign operations as well as increased utility charges.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $1.6 million or 12.4% compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the additional depreciation and amortization expense incurred as a result of the acquisition of PRA UK and its related property, equipment and intangible assets.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses were $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $4.8 million or 32.2% compared to other operating expenses of $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Of the $4.8 million increase, $0.9 million was due to an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts, $0.8 million was due to an increase in travel and travel related expenses, $0.4 million was primarily attributable to additional taxes, fees and licenses, $0.5 million was due to an increase in repairs and maintenance and $0.4 million was due to increased insurance expenses, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. None of the remaining $1.8 million increase was attributable to any significant identifiable items.

Gain on Sale of Property

Gain on sale of property was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 2011 amount was the result of the sale of a parcel of land adjacent to our Norfolk headquarters during 2011.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $1.6 million or 15.1% compared to interest expense of $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in our weighted average interest rate which decreased to 3.27% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 3.71% for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as a decrease in our average borrowings to $258.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $263.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $80.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $14.6 million or 22.0% compared to income tax expense of $66.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was mainly due to an increase of 23.6% in income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. This was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate to 39.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 39.6% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the tax benefits created by our international operations.

Supplemental Performance Data

Domestic Finance Receivables Portfolio Performance:

The following tables show certain data related to our domestic finance receivables portfolio. These tables describe the purchase price, actual cash collections and future estimates of cash collections, income recognized on finance receivables (gross and net of allowance charges), principal amortization, allowance charges, net finance receivable balances, and the ratio of total estimated collections to purchase price (which we refer to as purchase price multiple).

Further, these tables disclose our entire domestic portfolio, as well as its subsets: the portfolio of purchased bankrupt accounts and our Core portfolio. The accounts represented in the purchased bankruptcy tables are those portfolios of accounts that were bankrupt at the time of purchase. This contrasts with accounts that file for bankruptcy after we purchase them, which continue to be tracked in their corresponding Core portfolio. Core customers sometimes file for bankruptcy protection subsequent to our purchase of the related Core portfolio. When this occurs, we adjust our collection practices accordingly to comply with bankruptcy procedures; however, for accounting purposes, these accounts remain in the related Core portfolio. Conversely, bankrupt accounts may be dismissed voluntarily or involuntarily subsequent to our purchase of the related bankrupt portfolio. Dismissal occurs when the terms of the bankruptcy are not met by the petitioner. When this occurs, we are typically free to pursue collection outside of bankruptcy procedures; however, for accounting purposes, these accounts remain in the related bankruptcy pool.

Our United Kingdom portfolio is not significant and is therefore not included in these tables.

Purchase price multiples can vary over time due to a variety of factors including pricing competition, supply levels, age of the receivables purchased, and changes in our operational efficiency. For example, increased pricing competition during the 2005 to 2008 period negatively impacted purchase price multiples of our Core portfolio compared to prior years. During the 2009 to 2010 period, for example, pricing disruptions occurred as a result of the economic downturn. This created unique and advantageous purchasing opportunities, particularly within the bankruptcy receivables market, relative to the prior four years.

When competition increases and/or supply decreases, pricing often becomes negatively impacted relative to expected collections, and yields tend to trend lower. The opposite tends to occur when competition decreases and/or supply increases.

Purchase price multiples can also vary among types of finance receivables. For example, we incur lower collection costs on our bankruptcy portfolio compared with our Core portfolio. This allows us in general to pay more for a bankruptcy portfolio, experience lower purchase price multiples, and yet generate similar internal rates of return when compared with a Core portfolio.

Within a given portfolio type, to the extent that lower purchase price multiples are the result of more competitive pricing and lower yields, this will generally lead to higher amortization rates (payments applied to principal as a percentage of cash collections) and lower profitability. As portfolio pricing becomes more favorable on a relative basis, our profitability will tend to increase. Profitability within given Core portfolio types may also be impacted by the age and quality of the receivables, which impact the cost to collect those accounts.

The numbers presented in the following tables represent gross cash collections and do not reflect any costs to collect; therefore, they may not represent relative profitability. We continue to make enhancements to our analytical abilities, with the intent to collect more cash at a lower cost. To the extent we can improve our collection operations by collecting additional cash from a discrete quantity and quality of accounts, and/or by collecting cash at a lower cost structure, we can positively impact profitability.

Additionally, purchase price multiples can vary among periods due to our implementation of required accounting standards. Revenue recognition under ASC 310-30 is driven by estimates of total collections as well as the timing of those collections. We record new portfolio purchases using a higher confidence level for both estimated collection amounts and timing. Subsequent to the initial booking, as we gain collection experience and confidence with a pool of accounts, we continuously update ERC. These processes, along with the aforementioned operational enhancements, have tended to cause the ratio of ERC to purchase price for any given year of buying to gradually increase over time. As a result, our estimate of total collections to purchase price has generally, but not always, increased as pools have aged. Thus, all factors being equal in terms of pricing, one would typically tend to see a higher collection to purchase price ratio from a pool of accounts that was six years from purchase than say a pool that was just two years from purchase.

Due to all the factors described above, readers should be cautious when making comparisons of purchase price multiples among periods and between types of receivables.

Domestic Portfolio Data – Life-to-Date

Entire Domestic Portfolio



			Inception through December 31, 2013										As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996	$	3,080	$	10,207	$	7,084	$	3,123	$	—	$	7,084	$	—	$	25	$	10,232	332%
1997	7,685		25,506		17,402		8,104		—		17,402		—		112		25,618		333%
1998	11,089		37,351		26,365		10,986		—		26,365		—		234		37,585		339%
1999	18,898		69,355		50,181		19,174		—		50,181		—		481		69,836		370%
2000	25,020		116,665		91,468		25,197		—		91,468		—		1,912		118,577		474%
2001	33,481		175,907		141,555		34,352		—		141,555		—		2,654		178,561		533%
2002	42,325		198,477		156,153		42,324		—		156,153		—		4,824		203,301		480%
2003	61,447		265,205		203,757		61,448		—		203,757		—		7,688		272,893		444%
2004	59,176		198,276		140,298		57,978		1,200		139,098		—		7,478		205,754		348%
2005	143,167		311,102		184,577		126,525		10,755		173,822		5,886		12,286		323,388		226%
2006	107,667		208,451		127,478		80,973		20,715		106,763		5,979		11,881		220,332		205%
2007	258,367		478,812		262,546		216,266		20,680		241,866		21,416		47,813		526,625		204%
2008	275,128		473,695		261,009		212,686		35,645		225,364		26,763		50,230		523,925		190%
2009	281,424		745,983		494,794		251,189		—		494,794		30,235		150,324		896,307		318%
2010	357,976		743,239		465,559		277,680		325		465,234		79,996		283,835		1,027,074		287%
2011	393,202		553,690		321,008		232,682		—		321,008		160,522		445,252		998,942		254%
2012	508,976		351,488		176,089		175,399		—		176,089		333,578		630,475		981,963		193%
2013	629,501		154,142		82,295		71,847		—		82,295		558,170		989,616		1,143,758		182%
Total	$	3,217,609	$	5,117,551	$	3,209,618	$	1,907,933	$	89,320	$	3,120,298	$	1,222,545	$	2,647,120	$	7,764,671	241%

Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio



			Inception through December 31, 2013										As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996- 2003	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	—%
2004	7,468		14,492		8,224		6,268		1,200		7,024		—		52		14,544		195%
2005	29,301		43,641		14,767		28,874		410		14,357		17		58		43,699		149%
2006	17,627		31,565		14,791		16,774		800		13,991		53		229		31,794		180%
2007	78,526		104,131		35,557		68,574		9,815		25,742		137		831		104,962		134%
2008	108,586		164,188		71,182		93,006		13,250		57,932		2,330		2,973		167,161		154%
2009	156,036		404,808		260,679		144,129		—		260,679		11,907		66,306		471,114		302%
2010	209,175		390,722		227,586		163,136		—		227,586		46,039		125,411		516,133		247%
2011	181,949		164,349		71,898		92,451		—		71,898		89,499		142,299		306,648		169%
2012	252,442		120,998		42,854		78,144		—		42,854		174,298		224,505		345,503		137%
2013	235,781		52,528		16,761		35,767		—		16,761		200,015		260,324		312,852		133%
Total	$	1,276,891	$	1,491,422	$	764,299	$	727,123	$	25,475	$	738,824	$	524,295	$	822,988	$	2,314,410	181%

Core Portfolio



			Inception through December 31, 2013										As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996	$	3,080	$	10,207	$	7,084	$	3,123	$	—	$	7,084	$	—	$	25	$	10,232	332%
1997	7,685		25,506		17,402		8,104		—		17,402		—		112		25,618		333%
1998	11,089		37,351		26,365		10,986		—		26,365		—		234		37,585		339%
1999	18,898		69,355		50,181		19,174		—		50,181		—		481		69,836		370%
2000	25,020		116,665		91,468		25,197		—		91,468		—		1,912		118,577		474%
2001	33,481		175,907		141,555		34,352		—		141,555		—		2,654		178,561		533%
2002	42,325		198,477		156,153		42,324		—		156,153		—		4,824		203,301		480%
2003	61,447		265,205		203,757		61,448		—		203,757		—		7,688		272,893		444%
2004	51,708		183,784		132,074		51,710		—		132,074		—		7,426		191,210		370%
2005	113,866		267,461		169,810		97,651		10,345		159,465		5,869		12,228		279,689		246%
2006	90,040		176,886		112,687		64,199		19,915		92,772		5,926		11,652		188,538		209%
2007	179,841		374,681		226,989		147,692		10,865		216,124		21,279		46,982		421,663		234%
2008	166,542		309,507		189,827		119,680		22,395		167,432		24,433		47,257		356,764		214%
2009	125,388		341,175		234,115		107,060		—		234,115		18,328		84,018		425,193		339%
2010	148,801		352,517		237,973		114,544		325		237,648		33,957		158,424		510,941		343%
2011	211,253		389,341		249,110		140,231		—		249,110		71,023		302,953		692,294		328%
2012	256,534		230,490		133,235		97,255		—		133,235		159,280		405,970		636,460		248%
2013	393,720		101,614		65,534		36,080		—		65,534		358,155		729,292		830,906		211%
Total	$	1,940,718	$	3,626,129	$	2,445,319	$	1,180,810	$	63,845	$	2,381,474	$	698,250	$	1,824,132	$	5,450,261	281%

Domestic Portfolio Data – 2013

Entire Domestic Portfolio



			For the Year Ended December 31, 2013											As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996	$	3,080	$	24	$	24	$	—	$	—		$	24	$	—	$	25	$	10,232	332%
1997	7,685		84		84		—		—			84		—		112		25,618		333%
1998	11,089		173		173		—		—			173		—		234		37,585		339%
1999	18,898		483		483		—		—			483		—		481		69,836		370%
2000	25,020		1,349		1,349		—		—			1,349		—		1,912		118,577		474%
2001	33,481		2,339		2,339		—		—			2,339		—		2,654		178,561		533%
2002	42,325		3,433		3,433		—		—			3,433		—		4,824		203,301		480%
2003	61,447		5,331		5,331		—		—			5,331		—		7,688		272,893		444%
2004	59,176		4,522		4,522		—		—			4,522		—		7,478		205,754		348%
2005	143,167		9,916		4,573		5,343		(2,933		)	7,506		5,886		12,286		323,388		226%
2006	107,667		8,735		3,751		4,984		(1,800		)	5,551		5,979		11,881		220,332		205%
2007	258,367		29,450		15,389		14,061		(2,195		)	17,584		21,416		47,813		526,625		204%
2008	275,128		42,957		17,443		25,514		2,800			14,643		26,763		50,230		523,925		190%
2009	281,424		146,846		103,652		43,194		—			103,652		30,235		150,324		896,307		318%
2010	357,976		203,731		146,641		57,090		325			146,316		79,996		283,835		1,027,074		287%
2011	393,202		235,660		141,688		93,972		—			141,688		160,522		445,252		998,942		254%
2012	508,976		277,199		128,106		149,093		—			128,106		333,578		630,475		981,963		193%
2013	629,501		154,142		82,295		71,847		—			82,295		558,170		989,616		1,143,758		182%
Total	$	3,217,609	$	1,126,374	$	661,276	$	465,098	$	(3,803	)	$	665,079	$	1,222,545	$	2,647,120	$	7,764,671	241%

Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio



			For the Year Ended December 31, 2013												As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net			Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net			Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996- 2003	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	—%
2004	7,468		90		90		—		—			90			—		52		14,544		195%
2005	29,301		169		47		122		(83		)	130			17		58		43,699		149%
2006	17,627		419		265		154		(100		)	365			53		229		31,794		180%
2007	78,526		1,206		366		840		535			(169		)	137		831		104,962		134%
2008	108,586		11,650		2,013		9,637		6,500			(4,487		)	2,330		2,973		167,161		154%
2009	156,036		95,725		63,559		32,166		—			63,559			11,907		66,306		471,114		302%
2010	209,175		121,717		80,511		41,206		—			80,511			46,039		125,411		516,133		247%
2011	181,949		82,752		32,432		50,320		—			32,432			89,499		142,299		306,648		169%
2012	252,442		103,610		32,337		71,273		—			32,337			174,298		224,505		345,503		137%
2013	235,781		52,528		16,761		35,767		—			16,761			200,015		260,324		312,852		133%
Total	$	1,276,891	$	469,866	$	228,381	$	241,485	$	6,852		$	221,529		$	524,295	$	822,988	$	2,314,410	181%

Core Portfolio



			For the Year Ended December 31, 2013											As of December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)			Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		Actual Cash Collections Including Cash Sales		Income Recognized on Finance Receivables		Principal Amortization		Net Allowance Charges			Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, Net		Net Finance Receivables Balance		Estimated Remaining Collections		Total Estimated Collections		Total Estimated Collections to Purchase Price
1996	$	3,080	$	24	$	24	$	—	$	—		$	24	$	—	$	25	$	10,232	332%
1997	7,685		84		84		—		—			84		—		112		25,618		333%
1998	11,089		173		173		—		—			173		—		234		37,585		339%
1999	18,898		483		483		—		—			483		—		481		69,836		370%
2000	25,020		1,349		1,349		—		—			1,349		—		1,912		118,577		474%
2001	33,481		2,339		2,339		—		—			2,339		—		2,654		178,561		533%
2002	42,325		3,433		3,433		—		—			3,433		—		4,824		203,301		480%
2003	61,447		5,331		5,331		—		—			5,331		—		7,688		272,893		444%
2004	51,708		4,432		4,432		—		—			4,432		—		7,426		191,210		370%
2005	113,866		9,747		4,526		5,221		(2,850		)	7,376		5,869		12,228		279,689		246%
2006	90,040		8,316		3,486		4,830		(1,700		)	5,186		5,926		11,652		188,538		209%
2007	179,841		28,244		15,023		13,221		(2,730		)	17,753		21,279		46,982		421,663		234%
2008	166,542		31,307		15,430		15,877		(3,700		)	19,130		24,433		47,257		356,764		214%
2009	125,388		51,121		40,093		11,028		—			40,093		18,328		84,018		425,193		339%
2010	148,801		82,014		66,130		15,884		325			65,805		33,957		158,424		510,941		343%
2011	211,253		152,908		109,256		43,652		—			109,256		71,023		302,953		692,294		328%
2012	256,534		173,589		95,769		77,820		—			95,769		159,280		405,970		636,460		248%
2013	393,720		101,614		65,534		36,080		—			65,534		358,155		729,292		830,906		211%
Total	$	1,940,718	$	656,508	$	432,895	$	223,613	$	(10,655	)	$	443,550	$	698,250	$	1,824,132	$	5,450,261	281%

The following graph shows the purchase price of our domestic portfolios by year for the last ten years. The purchase price number represents the cash paid to the seller, plus certain capitalized costs, less buybacks.

As shown in the above chart, the composition of our domestic purchased portfolios shifted in favor of bankrupt accounts in 2009 and 2010, before returning to equilibrium with Core in 2011 and 2012. In 2013, Core purchases exceeded those of bankrupt accounts. We began buying bankrupt accounts during 2004 and slowly increased the volume of accounts we acquired through 2006 as we tested

our models, refined our processes and validated our operating assumptions. After observing a high level of modeling confidence in our early purchases, we began increasing our level of purchases more dramatically commencing in 2007.

Our ability to profitably purchase and liquidate pools of bankrupt accounts provides diversity to our distressed asset acquisition business. Although we generally buy bankrupt portfolios from many of the same consumer lenders from whom we acquire Core customer portfolios, the volumes and pricing characteristics as well as the competitors are different. Based upon market dynamics, the profitability of portfolios purchased in the bankrupt and Core markets may differ over time. We have found periods when bankrupt accounts were more profitable and other times when Core accounts were more profitable. From 2004 through 2008, our bankruptcy buying fluctuated between 13% and 39% of our total portfolio purchasing. In 2009, for the first time in our history, bankruptcy purchasing exceeded that of our Core buying, at 55% of total portfolio purchasing and during 2010 this percentage increased to 59%. This occurred as severe dislocations in the financial markets, coupled with legislative uncertainty, caused pricing in the bankruptcy market to decline substantially, thereby driving our strategy to make advantageous bankruptcy portfolio acquisitions during this period. For 2011, 2012, and 2013, bankruptcy buying represented 48%, 50%, and 38%, respectively, of our total domestic portfolio purchasing.

In order to collect our Core portfolios, we generally need to employ relatively higher amounts of labor and incur additional collection costs to generate each dollar of cash collections as compared with bankruptcy portfolios. In order to achieve acceptable levels of net return on investment (after direct expenses), we are generally targeting a total cash collections to purchase price multiple in the 2.0-3.0x range. On the other hand, bankrupt accounts generate the majority of cash collections through the efforts of the U.S. bankruptcy courts and trustees. In this process, cash is remitted to our Company with no corresponding cost other than the cost of filing claims at the time of purchase, court fees associated with the filing of ownership claim transfers and general administrative costs for monitoring the progress of each account through the bankruptcy process. As a result, overall collection costs are much lower for us when liquidating a pool of bankrupt accounts as compared to a pool of Core accounts, but conversely the price we pay for bankrupt accounts is generally higher than Core accounts. We generally target similar returns on investment (measured after direct expenses) for bankrupt and Core portfolios at any given point in the market cycles. However, because of the lower related collection costs, we can pay more for bankrupt portfolios, which causes the estimated total cash collections to purchase price multiples of bankrupt pools generally to be in the 1.2-2.0x range. In summary, compared to a similar investment in a pool of Core accounts, to the extent both pools had identical targeted returns on investment (measured after direct expenses), the bankrupt pool would be expected to generate less revenue, less direct expenses, similar operating income, and a higher operating margin.

In addition, collections on younger, newly filed bankrupt accounts tend to be of a lower magnitude in the earlier months when compared to Core charge-off accounts. This lower level of early period collections is due to the fact that we primarily purchase portfolios of accounts that represent unsecured claims in bankruptcy, and these unsecured claims are scheduled to begin paying out after payment of the secured and priority claims. As a result of the administrative processes regarding payout priorities within the court-administered bankruptcy plans, unsecured creditors do not generally begin receiving meaningful collections on unsecured claims until 12 to 18 months after the bankruptcy filing date. Therefore, to the extent that we purchase portfolios with more recent bankruptcy filing dates, as we did to a significant extent commencing in 2009, we would expect to experience a delay in cash collections compared with Core charged-off portfolios.

We utilize a long-term approach to collecting our owned portfolios of receivables. This approach has historically caused us to realize significant cash collections and revenues from purchased portfolios of finance receivables years after they are originally acquired. As a result, we have in the past been able to temporarily reduce our level of current period acquisitions without a corresponding negative current period impact on cash collections and revenue.

The following tables, which exclude any proceeds from cash sales of finance receivables, demonstrate our ability to realize significant multi-year cash collection streams on our domestic portfolios.

Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase – Entire Domestic Portfolio



($ in thousands)			Cash Collection Period
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		1996- 2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		Total
1996	$	3,080	$	8,919	$	285	$	210	$	237	$	102	$	83	$	78	$	68	$	100	$	39	$	24	$	10,145
1997	7,685		20,921		1,022		860		597		437		346		215		216		187		112		84		24,997
1998	11,089		28,878		2,200		1,811		1,415		882		616		397		382		332		241		173		37,327
1999	18,898		47,231		5,615		4,352		3,032		2,243		1,533		1,328		1,139		997		709		483		68,662
2000	25,020		62,498		14,098		10,924		8,067		5,202		3,604		3,198		2,782		2,554		1,927		1,349		116,203
2001	33,481		69,882		26,717		22,639		16,048		10,011		6,164		5,299		4,422		3,791		3,104		2,339		170,416
2002	42,325		51,331		35,742		32,497		24,729		16,527		9,772		7,444		6,375		5,844		4,768		3,433		198,462
2003	61,447		24,308		49,706		52,640		43,728		30,695		18,818		13,135		10,422		8,945		7,477		5,331		265,205
2004	59,176		—		18,019		46,475		40,424		30,750		19,339		13,677		9,944		8,522		6,604		4,522		198,276
2005	143,167		—		—		18,968		75,145		69,862		49,576		33,366		23,733		17,234		13,302		9,916		311,102
2006	107,667		—		—		—		22,971		53,192		40,560		29,749		22,494		18,190		12,560		8,735		208,451
2007	258,367		—		—		—		—		42,263		115,011		94,805		83,059		67,088		47,136		29,450		478,812
2008	275,128		—		—		—		—		—		61,277		107,974		100,337		89,344		71,806		42,957		473,695
2009	281,424		—		—		—		—		—		—		57,338		177,407		187,119		177,273		146,846		745,983
2010	357,976		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		86,562		218,053		234,893		203,731		743,239
2011	393,202		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		77,190		240,840		235,660		553,690
2012	508,976		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		74,289		277,199		351,488
2013	629,501		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		154,142		154,142
Total	$	3,217,609	$	313,968	$	153,404	$	191,376	$	236,393	$	262,166	$	326,699	$	368,003	$	529,342	$	705,490	$	897,080	$	1,126,374	$	5,110,295

Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase – Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio



($ in thousands)			Cash Collection Period
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		1996- 2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		Total
2004	$	7,468	$	—	$	743	$	4,554	$	3,956	$	2,777	$	1,455	$	496	$	164	$	149	$	108	$	90	$	14,492
2005	29,301		—		—		3,777		15,500		11,934		6,845		3,318		1,382		466		250		169		43,641
2006	17,627		—		—		—		5,608		9,455		6,522		4,398		2,972		1,526		665		419		31,565
2007	78,526		—		—		—		—		2,850		27,972		25,630		22,829		16,093		7,551		1,206		104,131
2008	108,586		—		—		—		—		—		14,024		35,894		37,974		35,690		28,956		11,650		164,188
2009	156,036		—		—		—		—		—		—		16,635		81,780		102,780		107,888		95,725		404,808
2010	209,175		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		39,486		104,499		125,020		121,717		390,722
2011	181,949		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		15,218		66,379		82,752		164,349
2012	252,442		—		—		—		—		—				—		—		—		17,388		103,610		120,998
2013	235,781		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		52,528		52,528
Total	$	1,276,891	$	—	$	743	$	8,331	$	25,064	$	27,016	$	56,818	$	86,371	$	186,587	$	276,421	$	354,205	$	469,866	$	1,491,422

Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase – Core Portfolio



($ in thousands)			Cash Collection Period
Purchase Period	Purchase Price		1996- 2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		Total
1996	$	3,080	$	8,919	$	285	$	210	$	237	$	102	$	83	$	78	$	68	$	100	$	39	$	24	$	10,145
1997	7,685		20,921		1,022		860		597		437		346		215		216		187		112		84		24,997
1998	11,089		28,878		2,200		1,811		1,415		882		616		397		382		332		241		173		37,327
1999	18,898		47,231		5,615		4,352		3,032		2,243		1,533		1,328		1,139		997		709		483		68,662
2000	25,020		62,498		14,098		10,924		8,067		5,202		3,604		3,198		2,782		2,554		1,927		1,349		116,203
2001	33,481		69,882		26,717		22,639		16,048		10,011		6,164		5,299		4,422		3,791		3,104		2,339		170,416
2002	42,325		51,331		35,742		32,497		24,729		16,527		9,772		7,444		6,375		5,844		4,768		3,433		198,462
2003	61,447		24,308		49,706		52,640		43,728		30,695		18,818		13,135		10,422		8,945		7,477		5,331		265,205
2004	51,708		—		17,276		41,921		36,468		27,973		17,884		13,181		9,780		8,373		6,496		4,432		183,784
2005	113,866		—		—		15,191		59,645		57,928		42,731		30,048		22,351		16,768		13,052		9,747		267,461
2006	90,040		—		—		—		17,363		43,737		34,038		25,351		19,522		16,664		11,895		8,316		176,886
2007	179,841		—		—		—		—		39,413		87,039		69,175		60,230		50,995		39,585		28,244		374,681
2008	166,542		—		—		—		—		—		47,253		72,080		62,363		53,654		42,850		31,307		309,507
2009	125,388		—		—		—		—		—		—		40,703		95,627		84,339		69,385		51,121		341,175
2010	148,801		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		47,076		113,554		109,873		82,014		352,517
2011	211,253		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		61,972		174,461		152,908		389,341
2012	256,534		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		56,901		173,589		230,490
2013	393,720		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		101,614		101,614
Total	$	1,940,718	$	313,968	$	152,661	$	183,045	$	211,329	$	235,150	$	269,881	$	281,632	$	342,755	$	429,069	$	542,875	$	656,508	$	3,618,873

When we acquire a new pool of finance receivables, our estimates typically result in a 60-96 month projection of cash collections, depending on the type of finance receivables acquired. The following chart shows our historical cash collections (including cash sales of finance receivables) in relation to the aggregate of the total estimated collection projections made at the time of each respective pool purchase, adjusted for buybacks, for the last ten years.

Primarily as a result of the downturn in the economy, the decline in the availability of consumer credit, our efforts to help customers establish reasonable payment plans, and improvements in our collections capabilities which have allowed us to profitably collect on accounts with lower balances or lower quality, the average payment size has decreased over the past several years. However, due to improved scoring and segmentation, together with enhanced productivity, we have been able to realize increased amounts of cash collections by generating enough incremental payments to overcome the decrease in payment size. The decreasing average payment size trend moderated during 2012, and the average payment size was stable during 2013.

The following chart illustrates the excess of our cash collections on our owned portfolios over income recognized on finance receivables on a quarterly basis. The difference between cash collections and income recognized on finance receivables is referred to as payments applied to principal. It is also referred to as amortization of purchase price. This amortization is the portion of cash collections that is used to recover the cost of the portfolio investment represented on the balance sheet.


(1)	Includes cash collections on finance receivables only and excludes cash proceeds from sales of defaulted consumer receivables.

Seasonality

Collections tend to be higher in the first and second quarters of the year and lower in the third and fourth quarters of the year, due to customer payment patterns in connection with seasonal employment trends, income tax refunds and holiday spending habits. Historically, our growth has partially offset the impact of this seasonality.

The following table displays our quarterly cash collections by source, for the periods indicated.



Cash Collection Source ($ in thousands)	Q42013		Q32013		Q22013		Q12013		Q42012		Q32012		Q22012		Q12012
Call Center & Other Collections	$	84,375	$	89,512	$	90,229	$	89,037	$	72,624	$	72,394	$	73,582	$	79,805
External Legal Collections	46,066		48,274		50,131		47,910		41,521		39,913		41,464		34,852
Internal Legal Collections	34,101		33,288		30,365		29,283		23,968		25,650		25,361		23,345
Bankruptcy Court Trustee Payments	114,384		120,577		125,672		109,233		91,098		91,095		92,018		79,994
Total Cash Collections	$	278,926	$	291,651	$	296,397	$	275,463	$	229,211	$	229,052	$	232,425	$	217,996

Rollforward of Net Finance Receivables

The following table shows the changes in finance receivables, net, including the amounts paid to acquire new portfolios for the years ended December 31, (in thousands).



	2013			2012			2011
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,078,951		$	926,734		$	831,330
Acquisitions of finance receivables ⁽¹⁾	638,616			529,691			398,999
Foreign currency translation adjustment	515			575			—
Cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables ⁽²⁾	(478,891		)	(378,049		)	(303,595		)
Balance at end of year	$	1,239,191		$	1,078,951		$	926,734
Estimated Remaining Collections (“ERC”) ⁽³⁾	$	2,669,270		$	2,315,189		$	1,953,348


(1)	Acquisitions of finance receivables is net of buybacks and includes certain capitalized acquisition related costs.


(2)	Cash collections applied to principal (also referred to as amortization) on finance receivables consists of cash collections less income recognized on finance receivables, net of allowance charges.


(3)	Estimated Remaining Collections refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections on our owned portfolios.

Collections Productivity

The following table contains our collector productivity metrics, as defined, by calendar quarter.

Cash Collections per Collector Hour Paid (Domestic Portfolio Only)



	Core cash collections ⁽¹⁾
	2013 ⁽⁵⁾		2012		2011		2010		2009
Q1	$	193	$	166	$	162	$	135	$	120
Q2	$	190	$	169	$	154	$	127	$	114
Q3	$	191	$	171	$	152	$	127	$	111
Q4	$	190	$	150	$	137	$	129	$	109
	Total cash collections ⁽²⁾
	2013 ⁽⁵⁾		2012		2011		2010		2009
Q1	$	304	$	258	$	241	$	182	$	147
Q2	$	315	$	275	$	243	$	188	$	143
Q3	$	310	$	279	$	249	$	200	$	144
Q4	$	308	$	245	$	228	$	204	$	148
	Non-legal cash collections ⁽³⁾
	2013 ⁽⁵⁾		2012		2011		2010		2009
Q1	$	251	$	216	$	204	$	154	$	118
Q2	$	261	$	225	$	205	$	160	$	116
Q3	$	259	$	230	$	212	$	170	$	119
Q4	$	256	$	200	$	194	$	174	$	123
	Non-legal/non-bankruptcy cash collections ⁽⁴⁾
	2013 ⁽⁵⁾		2012		2011		2010		2009
Q1	$	140	$	125	$	125	$	106	$	90
Q2	$	137	$	120	$	116	$	100	$	87
Q3	$	140	$	122	$	115	$	97	$	87
Q4	$	138	$	105	$	103	$	98	$	84

(1)

Represents total cash collections less purchased bankruptcy cash collections from trustee-administered accounts. This metric includes cash collections from purchased bankruptcy accounts administered by the Core call center collection floor as well as cash collections generated by our internal staff of legal collectors. This calculation does not include hours paid to our internal staff of legal collectors or to employees processing the bankruptcy-required notifications to trustees.


(2)	Represents total cash collections (assigned and unassigned) divided by total hours paid (including holiday, vacation and sick time) to collectors (including those in training).


(3)	Represents total cash collections less external legal cash collections. This metric includes internal legal collections and all bankruptcy collections and excludes any hours associated with either of those functions.


(4)	Represents total cash collections less external legal cash collections and less purchased bankruptcy cash collections from trustee-administered accounts. This metric does not include any labor hours associated with the bankruptcy or legal (internal or external) functions but does include internally-driven cash collections from the internal legal channel.


(5)	Due to a change in our calculation methodology, figures for the first and second quarter of 2013 have been revised to conform to current period presentation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operations, bank borrowings, and convertible debt and equity offerings. Cash has been used for acquisitions of finance receivables, corporate acquisitions, repurchase of our common stock, repayments of bank borrowings, operating expenses, purchases of property and equipment, and working capital to support our growth.

As of December 31, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $162.0 million, compared to $32.7 million at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013, we had no debt outstanding on the revolving portion of our credit facility which represents availability of $435.5 million (subject to the borrowing base and applicable debt covenants). Conversely, at December 31, 2012, we had $127.0 million outstanding on the floating rate term loan portion of our credit facility which represented availability of $273.0 million (subject to the borrowing base and applicable debt covenants).

We have in place forward flow commitments for the purchase of defaulted consumer receivables over the next twelve months with a maximum purchase price of $90.0 million as of December 31, 2013. Additionally we may enter into new or renewed flow commitments in the next twelve months and close on spot transactions in addition to the aforementioned flow agreements. We believe that funds generated from operations and from cash collections on finance receivables, together with existing cash and available borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to finance our operations, planned capital expenditures, the aforementioned forward flow commitments, and additional, normal-course portfolio purchasing during the next twelve months. Business acquisitions or higher than normal levels of portfolio purchasing could require additional financing from other sources.

For domestic income tax purposes, we recognize revenue using the cost recovery method with respect to our debt purchasing business. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has audited and issued a Notice of Deficiency for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. It has asserted that tax revenue recognition using the cost recovery method does not clearly reflect taxable income, and that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. We have filed a petition in the United States Tax Court and believe we have sufficient support for the technical merits of our positions. If we are unsuccessful in the United States Tax Court, we can appeal to the federal Circuit Court of Appeals. If judicial appeals prove unsuccessful, we may ultimately be required to pay the related deferred taxes, and possibly interest and penalties, which may require additional financing from other sources. In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, underpayments of federal tax accrue interest, compounded daily, at the applicable federal short term rate plus three percentage points. An additional two percentage points applies to large corporate underpayments of $100,000 or more to periods after the applicable date as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Deferred taxes related to this item were $209.3 million at December 31, 2013.

Cash generated from operations is dependent upon our ability to collect on our finance receivables. Many factors, including the economy and our ability to hire and retain qualified collectors and managers, are essential to our ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in these factors that cause a negative impact on our business could have a material impact on our future cash flows.

On February 2, 2012, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $100 million of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. The program is administered by a special committee of the board of directors. Repurchases depend on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased 1,203,412 shares of our common stock at an average price of $48.62 per share. At December 31, 2013, the maximum remaining purchase price for share repurchases under the plan is approximately $18.8 million.

Our operating activities provided cash of $225.1 million, $131.4 million, and $173.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. In these periods, cash from operations was generated primarily from net income earned through

cash collections and fee income received for the period. The decrease from 2011 to 2012 was due in part to a $75.1 million increase in cash paid for income taxes.

Our investing activities used cash of $175.6 million, $205.6 million, $104.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities is primarily driven by cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables. Cash used in investing activities is primarily driven by acquisitions of defaulted consumer receivables, purchases of property and equipment, and business acquisitions. The change was due in part to net cash payments for corporate acquisitions totaling $149.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The change was also due to an increase in acquisitions of finance receivables, which increased to $638.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $457.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $399.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was partially offset by an increase in collections applied to principal on finance receivables to $478.8 million, from $378.0 million, and $303.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

Our financing activities provided cash of $79.8 million and $80.7 million, and used cash of $82.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Cash was primarily provided by proceeds from our revolving credit facility and, in 2013, proceeds from our convertible debt offering. Cash used in financing activities was primarily driven by principal payments on our revolving credit facility and repurchases of our common stock. The change was due in large part to the convertible debt offering that occurred in the third quarter of 2013. This provided us with $287.5 million in gross proceeds of the offering during the year ended December 31, 2013. The change was also due to changes in the net borrowings on our credit facility. We had net repayments on our credit facility of $127.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to net borrowings of $107.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, and net repayments of $80.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. In addition, cash flow related to financing activities was impacted by stock repurchases of $58.5 million in 2013, and $22.7 million in 2012.

Cash paid for interest was $9.8 million, $9.6 million, and $10.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Interest was paid on our revolving credit facility, long-term debt and convertible debt. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the year ended December 31, 2012 was mainly due to an increase in our weighted average borrowings to $309.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $258.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 offset by a decrease in our weighted average interest rate which decreased to 2.70% for the year ended December 31, 2013 from 3.27% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2012 from the year ended December 31, 2011 was mainly due to a decrease in our weighted average interest rate which decreased to 3.27% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 3.71% for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as a decrease in our weighted average borrowings to $258.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $263.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Cash paid for income taxes was $105.7 million, $98.7 million, and $23.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The increase in taxes paid is primarily due to an increase in taxable income.

Borrowings

On December 19, 2012, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein (the “Credit Agreement”). On August 6, 2013, we entered into a First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement. The First Amendment amended and restated certain provisions to clarify the permitted indebtedness basket for the issuance of senior, unsecured convertible notes in an aggregate amount not to exceed $300,000,000. On August 21, 2013, we entered into a Lender Joinder Agreement and Lender Commitment Agreement, and Consented to a Master Assignment and Assumption (collectively, the “Loan Modification Agreements”), which together modified the Credit Agreement. The Loan Modification Agreements, among other things, increased by $35.5 million the amount of revolving credit availability under the Credit Agreement. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended and modified, the credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount available of $630.5 million (subject to the borrowing base and applicable debt covenants) which consists of a $195.0 million floating rate term loan that amortizes and matures on December 19, 2017 and a $435.5 million revolving credit facility (after giving effect to the August 21, 2013 modification) that matures on December 19, 2017. Our revolving credit facility includes a $20.0 million swingline loan sublimit, a $20.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $20.0 million alternative currency equivalent sublimit. It also contains an accordion loan feature that allows us to request an increase of up to $214.5 million in the amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility, whether from existing or new lenders, subject to terms of the Credit Agreement. No existing lender is obligated to increase its commitment. The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets.

Borrowings outstanding on our credit facility at December 31, 2013 consisted of $195.0 million outstanding on the term loan with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2013 of 2.67%. At December 31, 2012, borrowings on our credit facility consisted of $122.0 million in 30-day Eurodollar rate loans and $5.0 million in base rate loans with a weighted average interest rate of 2.74%. In addition, we had $200.0 million outstanding on the term loan at December 31, 2012 with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2012 of 2.71%. The revolving credit facility also bears an unused line fee of 0.375% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears.

On August 13, 2013, we completed the private offering of $287.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated August 13, 2013 (the "Indenture") between us and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default after which the Notes may be due and payable immediately. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually, in arrears, on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on February 1, 2014.

The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes were approximately $279.3 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses payable by us. We used $174.0 million of the net proceeds from this offering to repay the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility and used $50.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock.

We were in compliance with all covenants of our credit facilities and the Indenture as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity was $869.5 million at December 31, 2013 and $708.4 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was due primarily to $175.3 million in net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013 were as follows (amounts in thousands):



	Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		More than 5 years
Operating leases	$	28,358	$	6,302	$	11,266	$	6,765	$	4,025
Line of credit ⁽¹⁾	6,551		1,652		3,266		1,633		—
Long-term debt ⁽²⁾	565,466		23,861		63,854		173,001		304,750
Purchase commitments⁽³⁾	110,431		107,712		2,500		219		—
Employment agreements	16,043		11,948		4,095		—		—
Total	$	726,849	$	151,475	$	84,981	$	181,618	$	308,775


(1)	This amount includes estimated unused line fees due on the line of credit and assumes that the balance on the line of credit remains constant from the December 31, 2013 balance of $0.0 million.


(2)	This amount includes scheduled interest and principal payments on our term loan and our convertible debt.


(3)	This amount includes the maximum remaining amount to be purchased under forward flow contracts for the purchase of charged-off consumer debt in the amount of approximately $90.0 million.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2013 as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” to amend the accounting guidance on intangible asset impairment testing. The ASU permits entities to perform an optional qualitative assessment for determining whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted ASU 2012-02 in the first quarter of 2013 which had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income," which requires entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, by component. In addition, entities are required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, entities are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail on these amounts. We adopted ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of 2013 which had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity," which defines the treatment of the release of cumulative translation adjustments upon derecognition of certain subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity or of an investment in a foreign entity. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted and prior periods should not be adjusted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities.

Three of these policies are considered to be critical because they are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and because they require management to make judgments and estimates that are difficult, subjective, and complex regarding matters that are inherently uncertain.

We base our estimates on historical experience, current trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. If these estimates differ significantly from actual results, the impact on our consolidated financial statements may be material.

Management has reviewed these critical accounting policies with the Company's Audit Committee.

Revenue Recognition - Finance Receivables

We account for our investment in finance receivables under the guidance of ASC 310-30. We acquire portfolios of accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a portfolio reflects our determination that it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to an account's contractual terms. At acquisition, we review the accounts to determine whether there is evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, and if it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms. If both conditions exist, we then determine whether each such account is to be accounted for individually or whether such accounts will be assembled into pools based on common risk characteristics. We consider expected prepayments and estimate the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows (expected at acquisition) for each acquired portfolio based on our proprietary models, and then subsequently aggregate portfolios of accounts into pools. We determine the excess of the pool's scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted (nonaccretable

difference). The remaining amount, representing the excess of the pool's cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance receivables over the remaining estimated life of the pool (accretable yield). ASC 310-30 requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows, based on our estimates derived from our proprietary collection models, not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance sheet.

Each static pool is recorded at cost, which may include certain direct costs of acquisition paid to third parties, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, payments applied to principal and loss provision. Once a static pool is established for a calendar quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to the seller). ASC 310-30, utilizing the interest method, initially freezes the yield, estimated when the accounts are purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment testing. The yield is estimated and periodically recalculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using our proprietary collection models. Income on finance receivables is accrued quarterly based on each static pool's effective yield. Significant increases in expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively, through an upward adjustment of the yield, over a pool's remaining life. Any increase to the yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the estimated yield if the collection estimates are not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to maintain the then current yield and is shown as a reduction in revenue in the consolidated income statements with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting finance receivables, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. Cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool. This reduction in carrying value is defined as payments applied to principal (also referred to as principal amortization). Likewise, cash flows that are less than the interest accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Generally, we do not record accretion in the first six to twelve months of the estimated life of the pool; accordingly, we utilize either the cost recovery method or cash method when necessary to prevent accretion as permitted by ASC 310-30. Under the cash method, revenue is recognized as it would be under the interest method up to the amount of cash collections. Under the cost recovery method, no revenue is recognized until we have fully collected the cost of the pool, or until such time that we consider the collections to be probable and estimable and begin to recognize income based on the interest method as described above. We also use the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts cannot be reasonably estimated.

A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when received.

We establish valuation allowances, if necessary, for acquired accounts subject to ASC 310-10. Valuation allowances are established only subsequent to acquisition of the accounts.

We implement the accounting for income recognized on finance receivables under ASC 310-30 as follows. We create each accounting pool using our projections of estimated cash flows and expected economic life. We then compute the effective yield that fully amortizes the pool over a reasonable expectation of its economic life based on the current projections of estimated cash flows. As actual cash flow results are recorded, we balance those results to the data contained in our proprietary models to ensure accuracy, then review each pool watching for trends, actual performance versus projections and curve shape (a graphical depiction of the timing of cash flows), regularly re-forecasting future cash flows utilizing our statistical models. The review process is primarily performed by our finance staff; however, our operational and statistical staff is also involved, providing updated statistical input and cash projections to the finance staff. If there is a significant increase in expected cash flows, we will recognize the effect of the increase prospectively through an increase in yield. If a valuation allowance had been previously recognized for that pool, the allowance is reversed before recording any prospective yield adjustments. If the over performance is considered more of an acceleration of cash flows (a timing difference), we will: a) adjust estimated future cash flows downward which effectively extends the amortization period to fall within a reasonable expectation of the pool's economic life, b) adjust future cash flow projections as noted previously coupled with an increase in yield in order for the amortization period to fall within a reasonable expectation of the pool's economic life, or c) take no action at all if the amortization period falls within a reasonable expectation of the pool's expected economic life. To the extent there is underperformance, we will record an allowance if the underperformance is significant and will also consider revising estimated future cash flows based on current period information, or take no action if the pool's amortization period is reasonable and falls within the currently projected economic life.

Valuation of Acquired Intangibles and Goodwill

In accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), we amortize intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill, pursuant to ASC 350, is not amortized but rather is reviewed for impairment annually or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist. The review of goodwill for potential impairment is highly subjective and requires that: (1) goodwill is allocated to various reporting units of our business to which it relates; and (2) we estimate the fair value of those reporting units to which the goodwill relates and then determine the book value of those reporting units. During the review, we also consider qualitative factors that may have an impact on the final assessment regarding potential impairment. If the estimated fair value of reporting units with allocated goodwill is determined to be less than their book value, we are required to estimate the fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities of those reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation for an acquired business.

This may require independent valuation of certain unrecognized assets. Once this process is complete, the amount of goodwill impairment, if any, can be determined.

Income Taxes

We follow the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) as it relates to the provision for income taxes and uncertainty in income taxes. Accordingly, we record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC 740, the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with the guidance is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the enterprise determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the enterprise should presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. We record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

In the event that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, a valuation allowance would be established and charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. If we subsequently realize deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings or a decrease in goodwill in the period such determination is made. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

For domestic income tax purposes, we recognize revenue using the cost recovery method with respect to our debt purchasing business. We believe cost recovery to be an acceptable method for companies in the bad debt purchasing industry. Under the cost recovery method, collections on finance receivables are applied first to principal to reduce the finance receivables to zero before any income is recognized.



Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to interest rate risk from outstanding borrowings on our variable rate credit facility. We assess this interest rate risk by estimating the increase in interest expense that would occur due to an increase in short-term interest rates. The average borrowings on our variable rate credit facility were $309.7 million and $241.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Assuming a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, for example, interest expense would have increased by $6.2 million and $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, resulting in a decrease in income before income taxes of 2.2% and 2.4%, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $195.0 million and $327.0 million, respectively, of variable rate debt outstanding on our credit facility. We do not have any other variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2013. We had no interest rate hedging programs in place for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Significant increases in future interest rates on our variable rate credit facility could lead to a material decrease in future earnings assuming all other factors remained constant.

Currency Exchange Risk

In 2012, we acquired PRA UK. PRA UK conducts business in the Pound Sterling, but we report our financial results in U.S. dollars. Therefore, as a result of the PRA UK acquisition, we face exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Significant fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Pound Sterling may adversely affect our comprehensive income. We may or may not implement a hedging program related to currency exchange rate fluctuation. In 2013, PRA UK revenues were 1.3% of consolidated revenues.



Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

See Item 6 for quarterly consolidated financial statements for 2013 and 2012.

Index to Financial Statements



	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	63
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012	64
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	65
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	66
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	67
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated income statements, and statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Norfolk, Virginia

February 28, 2014

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)



	2013		2012
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,004	$	32,687
Finance receivables, net	1,239,191		1,078,951
Accounts receivable, net	12,359		10,486
Property and equipment, net	31,541		25,312
Income tax receivable	11,710		—
Deferred tax asset	1,361		—
Goodwill	103,843		109,488
Intangible assets, net	15,767		20,364
Other assets	23,456		11,668
Total assets	$	1,601,232	$	1,288,956
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	14,819	$	12,155
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	27,655		18,953
Income taxes payable	—		3,125
Accrued compensation	27,431		12,804
Net deferred tax liability	210,071		185,277
Borrowings	451,780		327,542
Total liabilities	731,756		559,856
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		20,673
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 2,000, issued and outstanding shares—0	—		—
Common stock, par value $0.01, 60,000 authorized shares, 49,840 issued and outstanding shares at December 31, 2013, and 60,000 authorized shares, 50,727 issued and outstanding shares at December 31, 2012	498		507
Additional paid-in capital	135,441		150,878
Retained earnings	729,505		554,191
Accumulated other comprehensive income	4,032		2,851
Total stockholders' equity	869,476		708,427
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,601,232	$	1,288,956

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Consolidated Income Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)



	2013			2012			2011
Revenues:
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	$	663,546		$	530,635		$	401,895
Fee income	71,589			62,166			57,040
Total revenues	735,135			592,801			458,935
Operating expenses:
Compensation and employee services	192,474			168,356			138,202
Legal collection fees	41,488			34,393			23,621
Legal collection costs	83,063			72,325			38,659
Agent fees	5,901			5,906			7,653
Outside fees and services	31,615			28,867			19,310
Communications	28,936			25,943			20,874
Rent and occupancy	7,536			6,781			5,891
Depreciation and amortization	14,385			14,515			12,943
Other operating expenses	25,809			19,651			14,914
Impairment of goodwill	6,397			—			—
Total operating expenses	437,604			376,737			282,067
Gain on sale of property	—			—			1,157
Income from operations	297,531			216,064			178,025
Other income and (expense):
Interest income	3			10			7
Interest expense	(14,469		)	(9,041		)	(10,569		)
Income before income taxes	283,065			207,033			167,463
Provision for income taxes	106,146			80,934			66,319
Net income	176,919			126,099			101,144
Adjustment for (net income)/net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	(1,605		)	494			(353		)
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	175,314		$	126,593		$	100,791
Net income per common share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc:
Basic	$	3.48		$	2.48		$	1.96
Diluted	$	3.45		$	2.46		$	1.95
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic	50,366			50,991			51,330
Diluted	50,873			51,369			51,690

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands)



	2013			2012		2011
Net income	$	176,919		$	126,099	$	101,144
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	1,181			2,851		—
Total other comprehensive income	1,181			2,851		—
Comprehensive income	178,100			128,950		101,144
Comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	(1,605		)	494		(353		)
Comprehensive income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	$	176,495		$	129,444	$	100,791

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands)



	Common Stock Shares Amount					Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock Shares Amount					Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Stockholders’ Equity

Balance at December 31, 2010	51,192		$	509		$	163,200		$	326,807	$	—	$	490,516
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	—		—			—			100,791		—		100,791
Net unrealized change in:
Exercise of stock options and vesting of nonvested shares	210		—			150			—		—		150
Amortization of share-based compensation	—		—			7,759			—		—		7,759
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation	—		—			641			—		—		641
Employee stock relinquished for payment of taxes	—		—			(257		)	—		—		(257		)
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	—		—			(4,112		)	—		—		(4,112		)
Balance at December 31, 2011	51,402		$	509		$	167,381		$	427,598	$	—	$	595,488
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	—		—			—			126,593		—		126,593
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—		2,851		2,851
Vesting of nonvested shares	318		1			(1		)	—		—		—
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock	(993	)	(3		)	(22,732		)	—		—		(22,735		)
Amortization of share-based compensation	—		—			11,282			—		—		11,282
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation	—		—			2,138			—		—		2,138
Employee stock relinquished for payment of taxes	—		—			(3,593		)	—		—		(3,593		)
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	—		—			(3,597		)	—		—		(3,597		)
Balance at December 31, 2012	50,727		$	507		$	150,878		$	554,191	$	2,851	$	708,427
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	—		—			—			175,314		—		175,314
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—		1,181		1,181
Vesting of nonvested shares	316		2			(2		)	—		—		—
Repurchase and cancellation of common stock	(1,203	)	(11		)	(58,500		)	—		—		(58,511		)
Amortization of share-based compensation	—		—			12,272			—		—		12,272
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation	—		—			4,552			—		—		4,552
Employee stock relinquished for payment of taxes	—		—			(7,350		)	—		—		(7,350		)
Equity component of convertible debt	—		—			31,306			—		—		31,306
Deferred taxes on equity component of convertible debt	—		—			(12,517		)	—		—		(12,517		)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest	—		—			14,986			—		—		14,986
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	—		—			(184		)	—		—		(184		)
Balance at December 31, 2013	49,840		$	498		$	135,441		$	729,505	$	4,032	$	869,476

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(Amounts in thousands)



	2013			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	176,919		$	126,099		$	101,144
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of share-based compensation	12,272			11,282			7,759
Depreciation and amortization	14,385			14,515			12,943
Amortization of debt discount	1,508			—			—
Impairment of goodwill	6,397			—			—
Deferred tax expense/(benefit)	11,011			(8,621		)	28,927
Gain on sale of property	—			—			(1,157		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Other assets	(4,751		)	1,523			(54		)
Accounts receivable	(1,786		)	(474		)	1,070
Accounts payable	2,556			1,049			4,212
Income taxes payable/receivable, net	(14,814		)	(11,193		)	15,472
Accrued expenses	14,179			469			2,118
Accrued compensation	7,251			(3,237		)	591
Net cash provided by operating activities	225,127			131,412			173,025
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(15,875		)	(7,115		)	(9,634		)
Proceeds from sale of property	—			—			1,267
Acquisition of finance receivables, net of buybacks	(638,616		)	(457,068		)	(398,999		)
Collections applied to principal on finance receivables	478,891			378,049			303,595
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired	—			(148,995		)	(985		)
Proceeds received from due from seller	—			29,548			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(175,600		)	(205,581		)	(104,756		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of options	—			—			150
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation	4,552			2,138			641
Payment of liability-classified contingent consideration	(5,240		)	—			—
Proceeds from line of credit	217,000			294,000			32,000
Principal payments on line of credit	(344,000		)	(187,000		)	(112,000		)
Repurchases of common stock	(58,511		)	(22,735		)	—
Payments of line of credit origination costs and fees	—			(4,994		)	—
Cash paid for noncontrolling interest	(5,663		)	—			—
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest	(2,075		)	—			(2,307		)
Principal payments on long-term debt	(5,542		)	(704		)	(1,150		)
Proceeds from convertible debt, net	279,281			—			—
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities	79,802			80,705			(82,666		)
Effect of exchange rate on cash	(12		)	(546		)	—
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	129,317			5,990			(14,397		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	32,687			26,697			41,094
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	162,004		$	32,687		$	26,697
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	9,830		$	9,566		$	10,280
Cash paid for income taxes	105,719			98,738			23,641
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	$	(184	)	$	(3,597	)	$	(4,112	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest	14,986			—			—
Distributions payable relating to noncontrolling interest	—			261			67
Employee stock relinquished for payment of taxes	(7,350		)	(3,593		)	(257		)
Conversion of revolving line of credit to long-term debt	—			200,000			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of operations: Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are a financial and business service company operating principally in the United States and the United Kingdom. The Company’s primary business is the purchase, collection and management of portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. The Company also services receivables on behalf of clients on either a commission or transaction-fee basis and provides class action claims settlement recovery services and related payment processing to corporate clients.

Basis of presentation: The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Under the guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280 “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), the Company has determined that it has several operating segments that meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280, and therefore, it has one reportable segment, accounts receivable management, based on similarities among the operating units including homogeneity of services, service delivery methods and use of technology.

On June 10, 2013, the Company's board of directors declared a three-for-one stock split by means of a stock dividend. The new shares were distributed on August 1, 2013, and the shares began trading on a split-adjusted basis beginning August 2, 2013. As a result of this action, approximately 33.8 million shares were issued to stockholders. The par value of the common stock remains at $0.01 per share and, accordingly, approximately $0.3 million was retroactively transferred from additional paid-in capital to common stock for all periods presented. Earnings per share and weighted average shares outstanding are presented in this Form 10-K after the effect of the stock split. The three-for-one stock split is reflected in the share and per share amounts in all periods presented in this Form 10-K including Note 10 “Share-Based Compensation,” Note 11 “Earnings per Share,” and Note 12 “Stockholders' Equity.”

With the acquisition of Mackenzie Hall Holdings, Limited, a limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, and its subsidiaries (“PRA UK”) on January 16, 2012, the Company began doing business in the United Kingdom. The assets, liabilities and operations of the Company's foreign subsidiary are recorded based on the functional currency of the entity. For PRA UK, the functional currency is the local currency, which is the Pound Sterling. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations are translated, for consolidation purposes, from the local currency to the U.S. dollar reporting currency at period-end rates for assets and liabilities and generally at average rates for results of operations and cash flows. The resulting unrealized gains or losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded in “Other operating expenses” in the consolidated income statements. The consolidated income statements include the results of operations of PRA UK for the period from January 16, 2012 through December 31, 2013.

The following table shows the amount of revenue generated for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and long-lived assets held at December 31, 2013 and 2012, by geographical location (amounts in thousands):



	Years Ended December 31,				As of December 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	Revenues				Long-Lived Assets
United States	$	725,649	$	574,525	$	29,501	$	23,375
United Kingdom	9,486		18,276		2,040		1,937
Total	$	735,135	$	592,801	$	31,541	$	25,312

Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the related operations. Long-lived assets consist of net property and equipment. Prior to the acquisition of PRA UK on January 16, 2012, all revenue generated and long-lived assets held related to the Company's United States operations.

Cash and cash equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Included in cash and cash equivalents are funds held on the behalf of others arising from the collection of accounts placed with the Company. The balance of the funds held on behalf of others was $8.7 million and $5.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There is an offsetting liability that is included in “Accounts payable” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Concentrations of credit risk: Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and investments. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents and investments with high quality financial institutions. At times, cash balances may be in excess of the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Currency translation: Financial statements of operating subsidiaries outside the United States generally are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Adjustments to translate those statements into U.S. dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income ("OCI").

Finance receivables and income recognition: The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables under the guidance of ASC Topic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”). The Company acquires portfolios of accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination and the Company's acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a portfolio reflects the Company's determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to an account's contractual terms. At acquisition, the Company reviews the accounts to determine whether there is evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, and if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan's contractual terms. If both conditions exist, the Company then determines whether each such account is to be accounted for individually or whether such accounts will be assembled into pools based on common risk characteristics. The Company considers expected prepayments and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows (expected at acquisition) for each acquired portfolio based on the Company's proprietary models, and the Company subsequently aggregates portfolios of accounts into pools. The Company determines the excess of the pool's scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted (nonaccretable difference). The remaining amount, representing the excess of the pool's cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance receivables over the remaining estimated life of the pool (accretable yield). ASC 310-30 requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows, based on the Company's estimates derived from its proprietary collection models, not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance sheet.

Each static pool is recorded at cost, which may include certain direct costs of acquisition paid to third parties, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, payments applied to principal and loss provision. Once a static pool is established for a calendar quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to the seller). ASC 310-30, utilizing the interest method, initially freezes the yield, estimated when the accounts are purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment testing. The yield is estimated and periodically recalculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using our proprietary collection models. Income on finance receivables is accrued quarterly based on each static pool's effective yield. Significant increases in expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively, through an upward adjustment of the yield, over a pool's remaining life. Any increase to the yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the estimated yield if the collection estimates are not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to maintain the then current yield and is shown as a reduction in revenue in the consolidated income statements with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting finance receivables, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. Cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool. This reduction in carrying value is defined as payments applied to principal (also referred to as principal amortization). Likewise, cash flows that are less than the interest accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Generally, the Company does not record accretion in the first six to twelve months of the estimated life of the pool; accordingly, the Company utilizes either the cost recovery method or cash method when necessary to prevent accretion as permitted by ASC 310-30. Under the cash method, revenue is recognized as it would be under the interest method up to the amount of cash collections. Under the cost recovery method, no revenue is recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the pool, or until such time that the Company considers the collections to be probable and estimable and begin to recognize income based on the interest method as described above. The Company also uses the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts cannot be reasonably estimated.

A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when received.

The Company establishes valuation allowances, if necessary, for acquired accounts subject to ASC 310-10. Valuation allowances are established only subsequent to acquisition of the accounts.

The Company implements the accounting for income recognized on finance receivables under ASC 310-30 as follows. The Company creates each accounting pool using its projections of estimated cash flows and expected economic life. The Company then computes the effective yield that fully amortizes the pool over a reasonable expectation of its economic life based on the current projections of estimated cash flows. As actual cash flow results are recorded, the Company balances those results to the

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

data contained in its proprietary models to ensure accuracy, then review each pool watching for trends, actual performance versus projections and curve shape (a graphical depiction of the timing of cash flows), regularly re-forecasting future cash flows utilizing the Company's statistical models. The review process is primarily performed by the Company's finance staff; however, the Company's operational and statistical staff are also involved, providing updated statistical input and cash projections to the finance staff. If there is a significant increase in expected cash flows, the Company will recognize the effect of the increase prospectively through an increase in yield. If a valuation allowance had been previously recognized for that pool, the allowance is reversed before recording any prospective yield adjustments. If the over performance is considered more of an acceleration of cash flows (a timing difference), the Company will: a) adjust estimated future cash flows downward which effectively extends the amortization period to fall within a reasonable expectation of the pool's economic life, b) adjust future cash flow projections as noted previously coupled with an increase in yield in order for the amortization period to fall within a reasonable expectation of the pool's economic life, or c) take no action at all if the amortization period falls within a reasonable expectation of the pool's expected economic life. To the extent there is underperformance, the Company will record an allowance if the underperformance is significant and will also consider revising estimated future cash flows based on current period information, or take no action if the pool's amortization period is reasonable and falls within the currently projected economic life.

The Company capitalizes certain fees paid to third parties related to the direct acquisition of a portfolio of accounts. These fees are added to the acquisition cost of the portfolio and accordingly are amortized over the life of the portfolio using the interest method.

The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days. Any funds received from the seller of finance receivables as a return of purchase price are referred to as buybacks. Buyback funds are applied against the finance receivable balance received and are not included in the Company’s cash collections from operations. In some cases, the seller will replace the returned accounts with new accounts in lieu of returning the purchase price. In that case, the old account is removed from the pool and the new account is added.

Fee income recognition: The Company utilizes the provisions of ASC Topic 605-45, “Principal Agent Considerations” (“ASC 605-45”), to account for fee income revenue from its fee-for-service subsidiaries. ASC 605-45 requires an analysis to be completed to determine if certain revenues should be reported gross or reported net of their related operating expense. This analysis includes an assessment of who retains inventory/credit risk, controls vendor selection, establishes pricing and remains the primary obligor on the transaction. Each of these factors was considered to determine the correct method of recognizing revenue from our subsidiaries.

The Company’s skip tracing subsidiary utilizes both gross and net reporting under ASC 605-45. The subsidiary generates revenue by working an account and successfully locating a customer for its client. An “investigative fee” is received for these services. In addition, the subsidiary incurs “agent expenses” where it hires a third-party collector to effectuate repossession. In many cases the subsidiary has an arrangement with its client which allows the subsidiary to bill the client for these fees. The Company has determined these fees to be gross revenue based on the criteria in ASC 605-45 and they are recorded as such in the line item “Fee income,” because the subsidiary is primarily liable to the third party collector. There is a corresponding expense in “Agent fees” for these pass-through items. The subsidiary also incurs fees to release liens on the repossessed collateral. These lien-release fees are netted in the line “Agent fees.”

The Company’s government processing and collection business’ primary source of income is derived from servicing taxing authorities in several different ways: processing all of their tax payments and tax forms, collecting delinquent taxes, identifying taxes that are not being paid and auditing tax payments. The processing and collection pieces are standard commission based billings or fee-for-service transactions. When an audit is conducted, there are two components. The first component is a billing for the hours incurred to conduct the audit. This billing is marked up from the actual costs incurred. The gross billing is a component of the line item “Fee income” and the expense is included in the line item “Compensation and employee services.” The second component is expenses incurred while conducting the audit. Most jurisdictions will reimburse the business for direct expenses incurred for the audit including such items as travel and meals. The billed amounts are included in the line item “Fee income” and the expense component is included in its appropriate expense category, generally, “Other operating expenses.”

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company’s claims administration and payment processing subsidiary utilizes net reporting under ASC 605-45. It generates revenue by filing claims with the class action claims administrator on behalf of its clients and receiving the related settlement payment. Under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, the Company has determined that the fee is not earned until the subsidiary has received the settlement funds. When a payment is received from the claims administrator for settlement of a lawsuit, the fee is recorded on a net basis as revenue and included in the line item “Fee income.” The balance of the received amounts is recorded as a liability and included in the line item “Accounts payable.”

The Company's United Kingdom subsidiary generates revenue from both purchased finance receivables which is accounted for as described above and also services finance receivables on a contingent fee basis. These portfolios are owned by its clients and placed under a contingent fee commission arrangement. The Company is paid to collect funds from the client's debtors and earns a commission generally expressed as a percentage of the gross collections amount. The "Fee income" line of its income statement reflects the contingent fee amount earned, and not the gross collection amount.

Property and equipment: Property and equipment, including improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend useful life, are recorded at cost, while maintenance and repairs are expensed currently. Property and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. Software and computer equipment are amortized or depreciated over three to five years. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five years. Equipment is depreciated over five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the useful life, which ranges from three to ten years, or the remaining term of the leased property. Building improvements are depreciated over ten to thirty-nine years. When property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and any gain or loss is included in the income statement.

Goodwill and intangible assets: In accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), the Company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill, pursuant to ASC 350, is not amortized but rather is reviewed for impairment annually or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist. The review of goodwill for potential impairment is highly subjective and requires that: (a) goodwill is allocated to various reporting units of the Company’s business to which it relates; and (b) the Company estimate the fair value of those reporting units to which the goodwill relates and then determine the book value of those reporting units. During the review, the Company also considers qualitative factors that may have an impact on the final assessment regarding potential impairment. If the estimated fair value of reporting units with allocated goodwill is determined to be less than their book value, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities of those reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation for an acquired business. This may require independent valuation of certain unrecognized assets. Once this process is complete, the amount of goodwill impairment, if any, can be determined. See Note 6 for additional information.

Noncontrolling interest: The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 480-10-S99 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480-10-S99”), which provides guidance on the accounting for equity securities that are subject to mandatory redemption requirements or whose redemption is outside the control of the issuer. The noncontrolling interest “put” arrangement is accounted for under ASC 480-10-S99, as redemption under the “put” arrangement is outside the control of the Company. As such, the redeemable noncontrolling interest is recorded outside of “permanent” equity. The Company measures the redeemable noncontrolling interest at the greater of its ASC 480-10-S99 measurement amount (estimated redemption value of the “put” option embedded in the noncontrolling interest) or its measurement amount under the guidance of ASC 810 "Consolidation" ("ASC 810"). The ASC 810 measurement amount includes adjustments for the noncontrolling interest’s pro-rata share of earnings, losses and distributions. Adjustments to the measurement amount are recorded to stockholders’ equity. The Company used a present value calculation to estimate the redemption value of the “put” option as of the reporting date. If material, the Company adjusts the numerator of earnings per share calculations for the current period change in the excess of the noncontrolling interest’s ASC 480-10-S99 measurement amount over the greater of its ASC 810 measurement amount or the estimated fair value of the noncontrolling interest.

Income taxes: The Company follows the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) as it relates to the provision for income taxes and uncertainty in income taxes. Accordingly, the Company records a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC 740, the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with the guidance is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the enterprise determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the enterprise should presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

In the event that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, a valuation allowance would be established and charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. If the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings or a decrease in goodwill in the period such determination is made. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

For domestic income tax purposes, the Company recognizes revenue using the cost recovery method with respect to the Company's debt purchasing business. The Company believes cost recovery to be an acceptable method for companies in the bad debt purchasing industry. Under the cost recovery method, collections on finance receivables are applied first to principal to reduce the finance receivables to zero before any income is recognized.

Advertising costs: Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.

Operating leases: General abatements or prepaid leasing costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease. In addition, future minimum lease payments (including the impact of rent escalations) are expensed on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease. Material leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the lease.

Share-based compensation: The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires that compensation expense associated with share equity awards be recognized in the income statement. Based on historical experience, the Company assumes a forfeiture rate for most equity share grants. Time-based equity share awards generally vest between one and five years from the grant date and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Equity share awards that contain a performance metric, are expensed over the requisite service period, generally three years, in accordance with the performance level achieved at each reporting period. See Note 10 for additional information.

Use of estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the timing and amount of future cash collections of the Company’s finance receivables portfolios. Actual results could differ from these estimates making it reasonably possible that a change in these estimates could occur within one year. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the estimates of future cash collections, and whether it is reasonably possible that its assessments of collectibility may change based on actual results and other factors.

Commitments and contingencies: We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, certain taxes, and commitments under contractual and other obligations. We recognize liabilities for contingencies and commitments when a loss is probable and estimable. We expense related legal costs as incurred. For additional information, see Note 14.

Estimated fair value of financial instruments: The Company applies the provision of FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also requires the consideration of differing levels of inputs in the determination of fair values. Based upon the fact there are no quoted prices in active markets or other observable market data, the Company used unobservable inputs for computation of the fair value of finance receivables, net for disclosure purposes. Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. See Note 9 for additional information.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Reclassification of prior year presentation: Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” to amend the accounting guidance on intangible asset impairment testing. The ASU permits entities to perform an optional qualitative assessment for determining whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2012-02 in the first quarter of 2013 which had no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income," which requires entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, by component. In addition, entities are required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP") to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, entities are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail on these amounts. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of 2013 which had no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity," which defines the treatment of the release of cumulative translation adjustments upon derecognition of certain subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity or of an investment in a foreign entity. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted and prior periods should not be adjusted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

2. Finance Receivables, net:

Changes in finance receivables, net for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, were as follows (amounts in thousands):



	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,078,951		$	926,734
Acquisitions of finance receivables, net of buybacks	638,616			529,691
Foreign currency translation adjustment	515			575
Cash collections	(1,142,437		)	(908,684		)
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	663,546			530,635
Cash collections applied to principal	(478,891		)	(378,049		)
Balance at end of year	$	1,239,191		$	1,078,951

At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool is generally estimated to be between 60 to 96 months based on projected amounts and timing of future cash collections using the proprietary models of the Company. Based upon current projections, cash collections applied to principal are estimated to be as follows for the following years ending December 31, (amounts in thousands):



2014	$	435,573
2015	342,638
2016	256,339
2017	152,954
2018	51,642
2019	45
	$	1,239,191

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company purchased approximately $7.9 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively, in face value of charged-off consumer receivables. At December 31, 2013, the estimated remaining collections (“ERC”) on the receivables purchased during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $1,006.4 million and $635.8 million, respectively. There were no sales of finance receivables during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had aggregate net finance receivables balances in pools accounted for under the cost recovery method of $26.1 million and $4.2 million, respectively.



	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,239,674		$	1,026,614
Income recognized on finance receivables, net	(663,546		)	(530,635		)
Additions	560,730			467,524
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference	286,840			276,171
Foreign currency translation adjustment	6,369			(3,436		)
Balance at end of year	$	1,430,067		$	1,239,674

A valuation allowance is recorded for significant decreases in expected cash flows or a change in the expected timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a reduction in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. In any given period, the Company may be required to record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables underperforming previous expectations. Factors that may contribute to the recording of valuation allowances may include both internal as well as external factors. External factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently on the overall profitability of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include: new laws or regulations relating to collections, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the economy. Internal factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the overall profitability of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include: necessary revisions to initial and post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal operational activities (which relate to the collection and movement of accounts on both the collection floor of the Company and external channels), as well as decreases in productivity related to turnover and tenure of the Company’s collection staff. The following is a summary of activity within the Company’s valuation allowance account, all of which relates to loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):



	2013
	Core Portfolio ⁽¹⁾			Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio ⁽²⁾			Total
Valuation allowance—finance receivables:
Beginning balance	$	74,500		$	18,623		$	93,123
Allowance charges	2,406			7,260			9,666
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges	(11,280		)	(408		)	(11,688		)
Net allowance (reversal)/charge	(8,874		)	6,852			(2,022		)
Ending balance	$	65,626		$	25,475		$	91,101
Finance receivables, net:	$	714,896		$	524,295		$	1,239,191

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



	2012
	Core Portfolio ⁽¹⁾			Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio ⁽²⁾			Total
Valuation allowance—finance receivables:
Beginning balance	$	76,580		$	9,991		$	86,571
Allowance charges	4,300			9,120			13,420
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges	(6,380		)	(488		)	(6,868		)
Net allowance (reversal)/charge	(2,080		)	8,632			6,552
Ending balance	$	74,500		$	18,623		$	93,123
Finance receivables, net:	$	535,894		$	543,057		$	1,078,951



	2011
	Core Portfolio ⁽¹⁾			Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio ⁽²⁾			Total
Valuation allowance—finance receivables:
Beginning balance	$	70,030		$	6,377		$	76,407
Allowance charges	9,650			4,051			13,701
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges	(3,100		)	(437		)	(3,537		)
Net allowance charge	6,550			3,614			10,164
Ending balance	$	76,580		$	9,991		$	86,571
Finance receivables, net:	$	454,161		$	472,573		$	926,734


(1)	“Core” accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that are defaulted consumer receivables and are not in a bankrupt status upon purchase. For this table, the Core Portfolio also includes accounts purchased in the United Kingdom. These accounts are aggregated separately from purchased bankruptcy accounts.


(2)	“Purchased bankruptcy” accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that are in bankruptcy status when purchased, and as such, are purchased as a pool of bankrupt accounts.

3. Accounts Receivable, net:

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts collected on accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio. In establishing the required allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market conditions and its customers’ financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, the current receivables aging, and current payment patterns. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The Company does not have any off balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (amounts in thousands):



	2013			2012			2011
Balance at beginning of year	$	2,429		$	2,102		$	2,491
Provision for doubtful accounts	22			1,093			81
Write-offs	(1,779		)	(766		)	(470		)
Balance at end of year	$	672		$	2,429		$	2,102

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4. Operating Leases:

The Company leases office space and equipment under operating leases. Rental expense was $6.0 million, $5.4 million and $4.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments for operating leases at December 31, 2013, are as follows for the years ending December 31, (amounts in thousands):



2014	$	6,302
2015	6,196
2016	5,070
2017	3,973
2018	2,792
Thereafter	4,025
Total future minimum lease payments	$	28,358

5. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest:

In accordance with ASC 810, the Company had consolidated all financial statement accounts of CCB in its consolidated balance sheets and its consolidated income statements. Effective January 31, 2013, the Company purchased one-half of the then remaining interest in CCB for a purchase price of $1.1 million. The purchase price was derived from the formula stipulated in the contractual agreement and was based on prior levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"). Effective August 31, 2013, the Company exercised its right, subject to a review period ended October 15, 2013, to purchase the remainder of the noncontrolling interest for a purchase price of approximately $4.5 million. The purchase price was derived from the formula stipulated in the contractual agreement and was based on prior levels of EBITDA. The closing occurred on October 31, 2013. Accordingly, at December 31, 2013, the Company owns 100% of CCB and the redeeemable noncontrolling interest is no longer presented on its consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2012, the redeemable noncontrolling interest amount is separately stated on the consolidated balance sheets and represents the 38% interest in CCB not owned by the Company. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is stated separately in the consolidated income statements for the first nine months of 2013, and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

The following table illustrates the changes in the redeemable noncontrolling interest for the period from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 (amounts in thousands):



Redeemable noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2011	$	17,831
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	(494		)
Distributions paid or payable	(261		)
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	3,597
Redeemable noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2012	20,673
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest	1,605
Distributions paid or payable	(1,814		)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest	(20,648		)
Adjustment of the redeemable noncontrolling interest measurement amount	184
Redeemable noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2013	$	—

6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net:

In connection with the Company’s previous business acquisitions, the Company acquired certain tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets purchased included client and customer relationships, non-compete agreements, trademarks and goodwill. Pursuant to ASC 350, goodwill is not amortized but rather is reviewed at least annually for impairment. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company evaluated the goodwill associated with one of its reporting units, which had experienced a revenue and profitability decline, recent net losses, and the loss of a significant client during the quarter. In its evaluation, the Company used a present value calculation of future cash flows and earnings to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. Based

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

on this evaluation, the Company recorded a $6.4 million impairment of goodwill in the third quarter of 2013. This non-cash charge represents the full amount of goodwill previously recorded for the Company’s subsidiary PRA Location Services, LLC ("PLS"). All other intangible assets related to PLS were fully amortized as of September 30, 2013. Prior to 2013, the Company had not previously recorded any impairment charges related to its goodwill or intangible assets. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company underwent its annual review of goodwill. Based upon the results of this review, which was conducted as of October 1, 2013, no impairment charges to goodwill or the other intangible assets were necessary as of the date of this review. The Company believes that nothing has occurred since the review was performed through December 31, 2013 that would indicate a triggering event and thereby necessitate further evaluation of goodwill or other intangible assets. The Company expects to perform its next annual goodwill review during the fourth quarter of 2014. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the carrying value of goodwill was $103.8 million and $109.5 million, respectively. The following table represents the changes in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:



	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of year	$	109,488		$	61,678
Acquisitions of PRA UK and NCM	—			45,494
Impairment of goodwill	(6,397		)	—
Foreign currency translation adjustment	752			2,316
Balance at end of year	$	103,843		$	109,488

Goodwill recognized from the acquisitions of PRA UK and NCM represents, among other things, an established workforce, the future economic benefits arising from expected synergies and expanded geographical diversity. The acquired goodwill is generally deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.

Intangible assets, excluding goodwill, consist of the following at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):



	2013				2012
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Client and customer relationships	$	40,870	$	26,581	$	40,698	$	22,516
Non-compete agreements	3,880		3,723		3,880		3,581
Trademarks	3,491		2,170		3,477		1,594
Total	$	48,241	$	32,474	$	48,055	$	27,691

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company is amortizing the intangible assets over the estimated useful lives. Total amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $4.7 million, $5.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The Company reviews these intangible assets upon the occurrence of a triggering event.

The future amortization of these intangible assets is estimated to be as follows as of December 31, 2013 for the following years ending December 31, (amounts in thousands):



2014	$	4,170
2015	3,096
2016	2,432
2017	1,531
2018	1,115
Thereafter	3,423
	$	15,767

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7. Borrowings:

The Company's borrowings consisted of the following as of the dates indicated (in thousands):



	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Line of credit, revolver	$	—		$	127,000
Line of credit, term loan	195,000			200,000
Equipment loan	—			542
Convertible notes	287,500			—
Less: Debt discount	(30,720		)	—
Total	$	451,780		$	327,542

Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility

On December 19, 2012, the Company entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein (the “Credit Agreement”). On August 6, 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement. The First Amendment amended and restated certain provisions to clarify the permitted indebtedness basket for the issuance of senior, unsecured convertible notes in an aggregate amount not to exceed $300,000,000. On August 21, 2013, the Company entered into a Lender Joinder Agreement and Lender Commitment Agreement, and Consented to a Master Assignment and Assumption (collectively, the “Loan Modification Agreements”), which together modified the Credit Agreement. The Loan Modification Agreements, among other things, increased by $35.5 million the amount of revolving credit availability under the Credit Agreement. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement as amended and modified, the credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount available of $630.5 million (subject to the borrowing base and applicable debt covenants) which consists of a $195.0 million floating rate term loan that amortizes and matures on December 19, 2017 and a $435.5 million revolving credit facility that matures on December 19, 2017. The term and revolving loans accrue interest, at the option of the Company, at either the base rate or the Eurodollar rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for the applicable term plus 2.50% per annum in the case of the Eurodollar rate loans and 1.50% in the case of the base rate loans. The base rate is the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of America’s prime rate, and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%. The Company’s revolving credit facility includes a $20 million swingline loan sublimit, a $20 million letter of credit sublimit and a $20 million alternative currency equivalent sublimit. The credit facility contains an accordion loan feature that allows the Company to request an increase of up to $214.5 million in the amount available for borrowing under the facility, whether from existing or new lenders, subject to terms of the Credit Agreement. No existing lender is obligated to increase its commitment. The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants and events of default including the following:


•	borrowings may not exceed 30% of the ERC of all its eligible asset pools plus eligible asset pools subject to certain conditions as defined in the agreement and 75% of its eligible accounts receivable;


•	the consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) cannot exceed 2.0 to 1.0 as of the end of any fiscal quarter;


•	consolidated tangible net worth (as defined in the Credit Agreement) must equal or exceed $455,091,200 plus 50% of positive cumulative consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2012, plus 50% of the cumulative net proceeds of any equity offering;


•	capital expenditures during any fiscal year cannot exceed $30 million;


•	cash dividends and distributions during any fiscal year cannot exceed $20 million;


•	stock repurchases during the term of the agreement cannot exceed $250 million and cannot exceed $100 million in a single fiscal year;


•	permitted acquisitions (as defined in the Credit Agreement) during any fiscal year cannot exceed $250 million;


•	the Company must maintain positive consolidated income from operations (as defined in the Credit Agreement) during any fiscal quarter; and


•	restrictions on changes in control.

The revolving credit facility also bears an unused line fee of 0.375% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears.

The Company's borrowings outstanding on its credit facility at December 31, 2013 consisted of $195.0 million outstanding on the term loan with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2013 of 2.67%. At December 31, 2012, the Company's borrowings on its credit facility consisted of $122.0 million in 30-day Eurodollar rate loans and $5.0 million in base rate loans with a weighted

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

average interest rate of 2.74%. In addition, the Company had $200.0 million outstanding on the term loan at December 31, 2012 with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2012 of 2.71%.

Equipment Loan

On December 15, 2010, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement to finance computer software and equipment purchases in the amount of approximately $1.6 million. The loan was collateralized by the related computer software and equipment. The loan term was 3 years with a fixed rate of 3.69% with monthly installments, including interest, of $46,108 beginning on January 15, 2011, and it matured on December 15, 2013. The balance of the equipment loan at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Convertible Senior Notes

On August 13, 2013, the Company completed the private offering of $287.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated August 13, 2013 (the "Indenture") between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default after which the Notes may be due and payable immediately. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually, in arrears, on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on February 1, 2014. Prior to February 1, 2020, the Notes will be convertible only upon the occurrence of specified events. On or after February 1, 2020, the Notes will be convertible at any time. Upon conversion, the Notes may be settled, at the Company’s option, in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or any combination thereof. Holders of the Notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or some of their Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture). In addition, upon the occurrence of a make-whole fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture), the Company may, under certain circumstances, be required to increase the conversion rate for the Notes converted in connection with such a make-whole fundamental change. The conversion rate for the Notes is initially 15.2172 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $65.72 per share of the Company’s common stock, and is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances pursuant to the Indenture. The Company does not have the right to redeem the Notes prior to maturity. As of December 31, 2013, none of the conditions allowing holders of the Notes to convert their Notes had occurred.

As noted above, upon conversion, holders of the Notes will receive cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s election. However, the Company’s current intent is to settle conversions through combination settlement (i.e., the Notes will be converted into cash up to the aggregate principal amount, and shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s election, for the remainder). As a result and in accordance with authoritative guidance related to derivatives and hedging and earnings per share, only the conversion spread is included in the diluted earnings per share calculation, if dilutive. Under such method, the settlement of the conversion spread has a dilutive effect when the average share price of the Company’s common stock during any quarter exceeds $65.72.

The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes were approximately $279.3 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The Company used $174.0 million of the net proceeds from this offering to repay the outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility and used $50.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock.

The Company determined that the fair value of the Notes at the date of issuance was approximately $255.3 million, and designated the residual value of approximately $32.2 million as the equity component. Additionally, the Company allocated approximately $7.3 million of the $8.2 million original Notes issuance cost as debt issuance cost and the remaining $0.9 million as equity issuance cost.

ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”), requires that, for convertible debt instruments that may be settled fully or partially in cash upon conversion, issuers must separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. Additionally, debt issuance costs are required to be allocated in proportion to the allocation of the liability and equity components and accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs, respectively.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The balances of the liability and equity components of all of the Notes outstanding were as follows as of the dates indicated(in thousands):



	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Liability component - principal amount	$	287,500		$	—
Unamortized debt discount	(30,720		)	—
Liability component - net carrying amount	256,780			—
Equity component	$	31,306		$	—

The debt discount is amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the Notes using the effective interest rate, which is 4.92%.

Interest expense related to the Notes was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012
Interest expense - stated coupon rate	$	3,306	$	—
Interest expense - amortization of debt discount	1,508		—
Total interest expense - convertible notes	$	4,814	$	—

The Company was in compliance with all covenants under its financing arrangements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The following principal payments are due on the Company's borrowings at December 31, 2013 for the years ending December 31, (amounts in thousands):



2014	$	10,000
2015	15,000
2016	20,000
2017	150,000
2018	—
Thereafter	287,500
Total	$	482,500

8. Property and Equipment, net:

Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands):



	2013			2012
Software	$	34,108		$	29,467
Computer equipment	17,072			14,129
Furniture and fixtures	8,616			7,220
Equipment	10,351			8,674
Leasehold improvements	11,147			7,231
Building and improvements	7,026			7,014
Land	1,269			1,269
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(58,048		)	(49,692		)
Property and equipment, net	$	31,541		$	25,312

Depreciation and amortization expense relating to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $9.7 million, $8.7 million and $8.1 million, respectively.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company, in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 350-40 “Internal-Use Software” (“ASC 350-40”), capitalizes qualifying computer software costs incurred during the application development stage and amortizes them over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis beginning when the project is completed. Costs associated with preliminary project stage activities, training, maintenance and all other post implementation stage activities are expensed as incurred. The Company’s policy provides for the capitalization of certain direct payroll costs for employees who are directly associated with internal use computer software projects, as well as external direct costs of services associated with developing or obtaining internal use software. Capitalizable personnel costs are limited to the time directly spent on such projects. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has incurred and capitalized $10.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively, of these direct payroll costs related to software developed for internal use. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, $1.7 million and $1.3 million of these costs are for projects that are in the development stage and therefore are a component of “Other assets.” Once the projects are completed, the costs will be transferred to Software and amortized over their estimated useful life of three to seven years. Amortization expense relating to this internally developed software as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $1.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Remaining unamortized costs relating to this internally developed software as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $4.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively.

9. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”), the table below summarizes fair value estimates for the Company’s financial instruments. The total of the fair value calculations presented does not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company. The carrying amounts in the table are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012, under the indicated captions (amounts in thousands):



	2013				2012
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	162,004	$	162,004	$	32,687	$	32,687
Finance receivables, net	1,239,191		1,722,100		1,078,951		1,776,049
Financial liabilities:
Revolving credit	$	—	$	—	$	127,000	$	127,000
Long-term debt	195,000		195,000		200,542		200,542
Convertible debt	256,780		316,857		—		—

As of December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company did not account for any financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value. As defined by FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also requires the consideration of differing levels of inputs in the determination of fair values. Those levels of input are summarized as follows:

•Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.


•	Level 2 - Observable inputs other than level 1 quoted prices, such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.


•	Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value and quoted prices for identical assets can be found in active markets. Accordingly, the Company estimates the fair value of cash and cash equivalents using level 1 inputs.

Finance receivables, net: The Company records purchased receivables at cost, which represents a significant discount from the contractual receivable balances due. The Company computed the estimated fair value of these receivables using proprietary pricing models that the Company utilizes to make portfolio purchase decisions. Accordingly, the Company's fair value estimates use level 3 inputs as there is little observable market data available and management is required to use significant judgment in its estimates.

Revolving credit: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the interest rate periods and the observable quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. Accordingly, the Company uses level 2 inputs for its fair value estimates.

Long-term debt: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the interest rate periods and the observable quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. Accordingly, the Company uses level 2 inputs for its fair value estimates.

Convertible debt: The Notes are carried at historical cost, adjusted for debt discount. The fair value estimate for these Notes incorporates quoted market prices which were obtained from secondary market broker quotes which were derived from a variety of inputs including client orders, information from their pricing vendors, modeling software, and actual trading prices when they occur. Accordingly, the Company uses level 2 inputs for its fair value estimates.

10. Share-Based Compensation:

The Company has an Omnibus Incentive Plan to assist the Company in attracting and retaining selected individuals to serve as employees and directors, who are expected to contribute to the Company's success and to achieve long-term objectives that will benefit stockholders of the Company. The 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by the Company's stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting. The Plan enables the Company to award shares of the Company's common stock to select employees and directors, as described in the Plan, not to exceed 5,400,000 shares as authorized by the Plan. The Plan replaced the 2010 Stock Plan.

As of December 31, 2013, total future compensation costs related to nonvested awards of nonvested shares (not including nonvested shares granted under the Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTI”)) is estimated to be $4.0 million with a weighted average remaining life for all nonvested shares of 1.5 years (not including nonvested shares granted under the LTI program). As of December 31, 2013, there are no future compensation costs related to stock options and there are no remaining vested stock options to be exercised. Grants made to key employees and directors of the Company were assumed to have no forfeiture rates associated with them due to the historically low turnover among this group.

Total share-based compensation expense was $12.3 million, $11.3 million and $7.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of share-based compensation expense (windfall tax benefits) recognized under the provisions of ASC 718 are credited to additional paid-in capital in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized tax shortfalls, if any, are first offset against the cumulative balance of windfall tax benefits, if any, and then charged directly to income tax expense. The total tax benefit realized from share-based compensation was approximately $8.2 million, $4.7 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

All share amounts presented in this Note 10 have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-one stock split by means of a stock dividend declared by the Company's board of directors on June 10, 2013.

Nonvested Shares

With the exception of the awards made pursuant to the LTI program and a few employee and director grants the nonvested shares vest ratably generally over three to five years and are expensed over their vesting period.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following summarizes all nonvested share transactions, excluding those related to the LTI program, from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



	Nonvested Shares Outstanding		Weighted-Average Price at Grant Date
December 31, 2010	273		$	15.96
Granted	144		25.53
Vested	(159	)	18.66
Cancelled	(15	)	16.78
December 31, 2011	243		19.77
Granted	159		22.00
Vested	(102	)	19.79
Cancelled	(12	)	23.31
December 31, 2012	288		20.84
Granted	110		37.31
Vested	(143	)	19.75
Cancelled	(29	)	20.57
December 31, 2013	226		$	29.58

The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $2.8 million, $2.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Long-Term Incentive Program

Pursuant to the Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant time-vested and performance based nonvested shares. All shares granted under the LTI program were granted to key employees of the Company. The following summarizes all LTI share transactions from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



	Nonvested LTI Shares Outstanding		Weighted-Average Price at Grant Date
December 31, 2010	366		$	11.68
Granted at target level	222		25.17
Adjustments for actual performance	45		16.24
Vested	(48	)	16.24
Cancelled	(37	)	13.18
December 31, 2011	548		17.01
Granted at target level	198		20.73
Adjustments for actual performance	120		18.00
Vested	(354	)	12.58
Cancelled	(15	)	22.55
December 31, 2012	497		21.71
Granted at target level	124		34.59
Adjustments for actual performance	108		17.91
Vested	(279	)	19.10
Cancelled	(16	)	25.01
December 31, 2013	434		$	25.79

The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $5.3 million, $4.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 2013, total future compensation costs, assuming the current estimated performance levels are achieved, related to nonvested share awards granted under the LTI program are estimated to be approximately $6.5 million. The Company assumed a 7.5% forfeiture rate for these grants and the remaining shares have a weighted average life of 1.4 years at December 31, 2013.

11. Earnings per Share:

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. by weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS are computed using the same components as basic EPS with the denominator adjusted for the dilutive effect of the Notes and nonvested share awards, if dilutive. For the Notes, only the conversion spread is included in the diluted earnings per share calculation, if dilutive. Under such method, the settlement of the conversion spread has a dilutive effect when the average share price of the Company’s common stock during any quarter exceeds $65.72, which did not occur during the period from which the Notes were issued on August 13, 2013 through December 31, 2013. The Notes were not outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Share-based awards that are contingent upon the attainment of performance goals are not included in the computation of diluted EPS until the performance goals have been attained. The dilutive effect of nonvested shares is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon the vesting of nonvested shares would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price for the period. The assumed proceeds include the windfall tax benefit that would be received upon assumed exercise. The following table provides a reconciliation between the computation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



	2013					2012					2011
	Net Income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.		Weighted Average Common Shares	EPS		Net Income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.		Weighted Average Common Shares	EPS		Net Income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.		Weighted Average Common Shares	EPS
Basic EPS	$	175,314	50,366	$	3.48	$	126,593	50,991	$	2.48	$	100,791	51,330	$	1.96
Dilutive effect of nonvested share awards			507					378					360
Diluted EPS	$	175,314	50,873	$	3.45	$	126,593	51,369	$	2.46	$	100,791	51,690	$	1.95

There were no antidilutive options outstanding as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

12. Stockholders’ Equity:

On February 2, 2012, the Company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program to purchase up to $100.0 million of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 1,203,412 shares of its common stock at an average price of $48.62 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 994,347 shares of its common stock at an average price of $22.85 per share. At December 31, 2013, the maximum remaining purchase price for share repurchases under the plan is approximately $18.8 million.

13. Income Taxes:

The Company records an income tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC 740, the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The income tax expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is comprised of the following (amounts in thousands):



	Federal			State			Foreign			Total
For the year ended December 31, 2013:
Current tax expense	$	82,163		$	12,163		$	833		$	95,159
Deferred tax expense/(benefit)	13,321			(550		)	(1,784		)	10,987
Total income tax expense/(benefit)	$	95,484		$	11,613		$	(951	)	$	106,146
For the year ended December 31, 2012:
Current tax expense/(benefit)	$	76,067		$	14,051		$	(563	)	$	89,555
Deferred tax (benefit)/expense	(8,837		)	(278		)	494			(8,621		)
Total income tax expense/(benefit)	$	67,230		$	13,773		$	(69	)	$	80,934
For the year ended December 31, 2011:
Current tax expense	$	31,185		$	6,207		$	—		$	37,392
Deferred tax expense	24,054			4,873			—			28,927
Total income tax expense	$	55,239		$	11,080		$	—		$	66,319

The Company has recognized a net deferred tax liability of $208.7 million and $185.3 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The components of the net deferred tax liability are as follows (amounts in thousands):




Deferred tax assets:	2013		2012
Employee compensation	$	9,365	$	5,179
Allowance for doubtful accounts	236		906
State tax credit carryforward	879		644
Other	240		—
Accrued liabilities	4,642		3,060
Guaranteed payments	890		734
Intangible assets and goodwill	930		—
Leases	531		448
Acquisition costs	687		704
Total deferred tax assets	18,400		11,675
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation expense	4,250		3,364
Intangible assets and goodwill	—		1,669
Prepaid expenses	1,604		1,231
Convertible debt	11,931		—
Other	—		554
Use of cost recovery for income tax purposes	209,325		190,134
Total deferred tax liability	227,110		196,952
Net deferred tax liability	$	208,710	$	185,277

The Company believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

A reconciliation of the Company’s expected tax expense at the statutory federal tax rate to actual tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (amounts in thousands):



	2013			2012			2011
Expected tax expense at statutory federal rates	$	99,073		$	72,462		$	58,612
State tax expense, net of federal tax benefit	7,548			8,546			7,379
Other	(475		)	(74		)	328
Total income tax expense	$	106,146		$	80,934		$	66,319

The guidance of ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with the guidance is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the enterprise should presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. ASC 740 requires the recognition of interest, if the tax law would require interest to be paid on the underpayment of taxes, and recognition of penalties, if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties. No interest or penalties were accrued at December 31, 2013 or 2012.

A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets has not been provided at December 31, 2013 or 2012 since management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the event that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Similarly, if the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with management’s expectations could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. At December 31, 2013, the Company had state income tax credit carryforwards of approximately $0.9 million which will begin to expire starting in the year ending December 31, 2021.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examined the Company's tax returns for the 2005 calendar year. The IRS concluded the audit and on March 19, 2009 issued Form 4549-A, Income Tax Examination Changes, for tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The IRS has asserted that tax revenue recognition using the cost recovery method does not clearly reflect taxable income, and that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. The Company believes it has sufficient support for the technical merits of its positions and that it is more likely than not these positions will ultimately be sustained; therefore, a reserve for uncertain tax positions is not required. The Company believes cost recovery to be an acceptable tax revenue recognition method for companies in the bad debt purchasing industry. For tax purposes, collections on finance receivables are applied first to principal to reduce the finance receivables to zero before any taxable income is recognized. On April 22, 2009, the Company filed a formal protest of the findings contained in the examination report prepared by the IRS. On August 26, 2011, the IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. The Company subsequently filed a petition in the United States Tax Court to which the IRS responded on January 12, 2012. If the Company is unsuccessful in the United States Tax Court, it can appeal to the federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Payment of the assessed taxes and interest could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, be material to the Company’s results of operations, and possibly require additional financing from other sources. In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, underpayments of federal tax accrue interest, compounded daily, at the applicable federal short term rate plus three percentage points. An additional two percentage points applies to large corporate underpayments of $100,000 or more to periods after the applicable date as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. The Company files taxes in multiple state jurisdictions; therefore, any underpayment of state tax will accrue interest in accordance with the respective state statute. On June 30, 2011, the Company was notified by the IRS that the audit period will be expanded to include the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 2013, the tax years subject to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions, including the IRS, are 2003, 2005 and subsequent years. The 2003 tax year remains open to examination because of a net operating loss that originated in that year but was not fully utilized until the 2005 tax year. The examination periods for the 2007, 2006 and 2005 tax years were extended through December 31, 2011; however, because the IRS issued the Notice of Deficiency prior to December 31, 2011, the period for assessment is suspended until a decision of the Tax Court becomes final. The statute of limitations for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 tax years has been extended to September 26, 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, the cumulative unremitted earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are approximately zero. There were no repatriations of unremitted earnings during 2013. The Company intends for predominantly all foreign earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in its foreign operations and, therefore, the recording of deferred tax liabilities for such unremitted earnings is not required. It is impracticable to determine the total amount of unrecognized deferred taxes with respect to these permanently reinvested earnings; however, foreign tax credits would be available to partially reduce U.S. income taxes in the event of a distribution.

14. Commitments and Contingencies:

Employment Agreements:

The Company has employment agreements, most of which expire on December 31, 2014, with all of its executive officers and with several members of its senior management group. Such agreements provide for base salary payments as well as bonuses which are based on the attainment of specific management goals. As of December 31, 2013, estimated future compensation under these agreements is approximately $16.0 million. The agreements also contain confidentiality and non-compete provisions.

Leases:

The Company is party to various operating leases with respect to its facilities and equipment. The future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2013 are approximately $28.4 million.

Litigation:

The Company is from time to time subject to routine legal claims and proceedings, most of which are incidental to the ordinary course of its business. The Company initiates lawsuits against customers and is occasionally countersued by them in such actions. Also, customers, either individually, as members of a class action, or through a governmental entity on behalf of customers, may initiate litigation against the Company in which they allege that the Company has violated a state or federal law in the process of collecting on an account. From time to time, other types of lawsuits are brought against the Company. Additionally, the Company receives subpoenas and other requests or demands for information from regulators or governmental authorities who are investigating the Company's debt collection activities. The Company makes every effort to respond appropriately to such requests.

The Company accrues for potential liability arising from legal proceedings when it is probable that such liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. This determination is based upon currently available information for those proceedings in which the Company is involved, taking into account the Company's best estimate of such losses for those cases for which such estimates can be made. The Company's estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the number of unresolved issues in many of the proceedings (including issues regarding class certification and the scope of many of the claims), and the related uncertainty of the potential outcomes of these proceedings. In making determinations of the likely outcome of pending litigation, the Company considers many factors, including, but not limited to, the nature of the claims, the Company's experience with similar types of claims, the jurisdiction in which the matter is filed, input from outside legal counsel, the likelihood of resolving the matter through alternative mechanisms, the matter's current status and the damages sought or demands made. Accordingly, the Company's estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses could be more than the current estimate.

Subject to the inherent uncertainties involved in such proceedings, the Company believes, based upon its current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the legal proceedings currently pending against it, including those that fall outside of the Company's routine legal proceedings, should not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition. However, it is possible in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings or due to unexpected future developments, that an unfavorable resolution of a legal proceeding or claim could occur which may be material to the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows for a particular period.

Excluding the matters described below and other putative class action suits which the Company believes are not material, the high end of the range of potential litigation losses in excess of the amount accrued is estimated by management to be less than

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

$1,000,000 as of December 31, 2013. Notwithstanding our attempt to estimate a range of possible losses in excess of the amount accrued based on current information, actual future losses may exceed both the Company's accrual and the range of potential litigation losses disclosed above.

In certain legal proceedings, the Company may have recourse to insurance or third party contractual indemnities to cover all or portions of its litigation expenses, judgments, or settlements. Loss estimates and accruals for potential liability related to legal proceedings are exclusive of potential recoveries, if any, under the Company's insurance policies or third party indemnities. The Company has not recorded any potential recoveries under the Company's insurance policies or third party indemnities.

The matters described below fall outside of the normal parameters of the Company’s routine legal proceedings.

Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation

The Company has been named as defendant in a number of putative class action cases, each alleging that the Company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") by calling consumers' cellular telephones without their prior express consent. On December 21, 2011, the United States Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation entered an order transferring these matters into one consolidated proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On November 14, 2012, the putative class plaintiffs filed their amended consolidated complaint in the matter, now styled as In re Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, case No. 11-md-02295 (the “MDL action”). The Company has filed a motion to stay this litigation until such time as the FCC has ruled on various petitions concerning the TCPA.

Internal Revenue Service Audit

The IRS examined the Company's tax returns for the 2005 calendar year. The IRS concluded the audit and on March 19, 2009 issued Form 4549-A, Income Tax Examination Changes, for tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The IRS has asserted that tax revenue recognition using the cost recovery method does not clearly reflect taxable income, and that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. The Company believes it has sufficient support for the technical merits of its positions and that it is more likely than not these positions will ultimately be sustained; therefore, a reserve for uncertain tax positions is not required. On April 22, 2009, the Company filed a formal protest of the findings contained in the examination report prepared by the IRS. On August 26, 2011, the IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. The Company subsequently filed a petition in the United States Tax Court to which the IRS responded on January 12, 2012. If the Company is unsuccessful in the United States Tax Court, it can appeal to the federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Refer to Note 13 “Income Taxes” for additional information.

Forward Flow Agreements:

The Company is party to several forward flow agreements that allow for the purchase of defaulted consumer receivables at pre-established prices. The maximum remaining amount to be purchased under forward flow agreements at December 31, 2013 is approximately $90.0 million.

Contingent Purchase Price:

The asset purchase agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of certain finance receivables and certain operating assets of National Capital Management, LLC ("NCM") in 2012, includes an earn-out provision whereby the sellers are able to earn additional cash consideration for achieving certain cash collection thresholds over a five year period. The maximum amount of earn-out during the period is $15.0 million. The Company paid the year one earn-out during December 2013 in the amount of $6.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has recorded a present value amount for the expected remaining liability of $4.9 million.

Finance Receivables:

Certain agreements for the purchase of finance receivables portfolios contain provisions that may, in limited circumstances, require the Company to refund a portion or all of the collections subsequently received by the Company on particular accounts. The potential refunds as of the balance sheet date are not considered to be significant.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

15. 401(k) Retirement Plan:

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan. Under the plan, all employees over eighteen years of age are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the plan up to 100% of their compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations, after completing six months of service, as defined in the plan. The Company makes matching contributions of up to 4% of an employee’s salary. Total compensation expense related to these contributions was $1.8 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

16. Subsequent Event:

On February 19, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire the equity of Aktiv Kapital AS (“Aktiv”), a Norway-based company specializing in the acquisition and servicing of non-performing consumer loans throughout Europe and in Canada. The purchase price is approximately $880 million plus the assumption of approximately $435 million of Aktiv's corporate debt, resulting in an acquisition of estimated total enterprise value of $1.3 billion. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2014, upon successful completion of customary closing conditions, including approval of the transaction by applicable competition authorities and its ability to obtain the necessary financing to consummate the transaction.

The Company expects to finance this transaction with a combination of cash, $170 million of seller financing, $435 million from its domestic, revolving credit facility, and by accessing an accordion feature on its credit facility of up to $214 million. The Company may choose to use other debt instruments to expand, replace or pay down any of these financing options.

The Company expects Aktiv's Chief Executive Officer and his executive team and the more than 400 Aktiv employees to join its workforce upon the closing of the transaction.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31, 2013, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which is included herein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.:

We have audited Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Item 9A). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated income statements, and statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity , and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Norfolk, Virginia

February 28, 2014

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections labeled “Security Ownership of Management and Directors,” “Board of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance,” “Committees of the Board of Directors” and “Report of the Audit Committee” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to (a) the section labeled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and (b) the section labeled “Compensation Committee Report” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which section (and the report contained therein) shall be deemed to be furnished in this report and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a result of such furnishing in this Item 11.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management And Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section labeled “Security Ownership of Management and Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections labeled “Policies for Approval of Related Party Transactions” and “Director Independence” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the section labeled “Fees Paid to KPMG LLP” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART IV



Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.


(a)	Financial Statements.

The following financial statements of the Company are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:



	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	63
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012	64
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	65
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	66
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	67
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69


(b)	Exhibits.



2.1	Equity Exchange Agreement between Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 30, 2002).



3.1	Seconded Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 5, 2011).



3.2	Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009).



4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 15, 2002).



4.2	Form of Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 30, 2002).



4.3	Indenture dated August 13, 2013 between Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14, 2013).



10.1	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Steven D. Fredrickson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.2	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Kevin P. Stevenson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.3	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Judith S. Scott and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.4	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Michael J. Petit and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.5	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Peter K. McCammon and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.6	Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2011, by and between Neal Stern and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011).



10.7	Portfolio Recovery Associates 2010 Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2010).



10.8	Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., Annual Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2010).



10.9	Credit Agreement dated as of December 19, 2012 by and among Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, PRA Holding I, LLC, PRA Location Services, LLC, PRA Government Services, LLC, PRA Receivables Management, LLC, PRA Holding II, LLC, PRA Holding III, LLC, MuniServices, LLC, PRA Professional Services, LLC, PRA Financial Services, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, swing line lender, and l/c issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank as co-syndication agents, KeyBank, National Association, as documentation agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, and the lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2012).



10.10	First Amendment to Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2013).



10.11	Lender Commitment Agreement dated as of August 21, 2013 by and among Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2013).



10.12	Lender Joiner Agreement dated as of August 21, 2013, by and among Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., Bank of Hampton Roads, Heritage Bank, Union First Market and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2013).



10.13	2013 Annual Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 19, 2013).



10.14	2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 19, 2013).



21.1	Subsidiaries of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (filed herewith).



23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith).



24.1	Powers of Attorney (included on signature page) (filed herewith).



31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).



31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).



32.1	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).



101.INS	XBRL Instance Document



101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document



101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document



101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document



101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document



101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




	Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
	(Registrant)

Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
		Steven D. Fredrickson
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
		Kevin P. Stevenson
		Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven D. Fredrickson and Kevin P. Stevenson, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and on his behalf, and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to execute and sign any and all amendments or post-effective amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and the registrant hereby confers like authority on its behalf.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
		Steven D. Fredrickson
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
		Kevin P. Stevenson
		Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Marjorie M. Connelly
		Marjorie M. Connelly
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ John H. Fain
		John H. Fain
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Penelope W. Kyle
		Penelope W. Kyle
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ James A. Nussle
		James A. Nussle
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ David N. Roberts
		David N. Roberts
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Scott M. Tabakin
		Scott M. Tabakin
		Director





Date: February 28, 2014	By:	/s/ James M. Voss
		James M. Voss
		Director