SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Marriott International, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT SUBJECT TO COMPLETION 2019 Proxy Statement Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders Friday, May 10, 2019

Letter from our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer

LETTER FROM OUR CHAIRMAN AND OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Acquisition Integration

The Starwood transaction is unlocking tremendous value for our customers, owners and stockholders. As one of the largest transactions ever in the hospitality industry, integration into one unified company has been an understandably complex process. While Marriott and Starwood were both hospitality companies, the back-end systems that supported our businesses – such as property management, reservations and loyalty systems – were very different.

The integration of our loyalty programs involved the creation or update of 1.5 million property webpages and the migration of large numbers of member data records. Following the cutover to the new system, some loyalty members discovered errors in their online statements, and we experienced unexpectedly high customer service call volumes as we reconciled these issues. Call volume has returned to normal as we have resolved these issues.

At the end of November, we disclosed a data security incident involving the legacy-Starwood guest reservation system that involved up to an estimated 383 million guest records. Upon discovery, we quickly notified our guests and have supported law enforcement authorities in their investigation of the incident. We set up an extensive support system to help address our customers’ concerns and finalized the transition to Marriott’s new, unified reservation system. We also accelerated ongoing security enhancements to our information technology systems and network.

Our Board has partnered closely with our management team to address these challenges and improve our capabilities and processes. In addition to the operational steps we have taken, the Board has delegated to the Audit Committee initial oversight of the Company’s information security and privacy practices. Finally, as part of our Board refreshment process, we have appointed Margaret M. McCarthy to the Board. Ms. McCarthy has deep experience in customer-facing business undergoing transformative change and brings with her deep experience in technology and data security matters.

Letter from our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer

Marriott is a company that takes pride in taking care of our guests in every aspect of their stay. In these events, we did not meet the high standards that our guests expect and deserve. We deeply regret these incidents. Our management team and Board are focused on both resolving any remaining concerns and, more importantly, ensuring that in the future we continue to exemplify the Marriott standard of excellence.

Doing Good in Every Direction

At Marriott International, we believe we have a responsibility and vested interest in helping to address some of the world’s most pressing social, environmental and economic issues. With our size and global scale, we are well positioned to be part of the solution. In 2018, we completed the first full year of community action through our new sustainability and social impact platform, Serve 360: Doing Good in Every Direction. Motivated by the core value to Serve Our World, Serve 360 stands as Marriott’s framework to activate and focus our community efforts. Guided by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, Serve 360 is delivering positive results through four priority areas: Sustain Responsible Operations, Empower Through Opportunity, Welcome All and Advance Human Rights, and Nurture Our World.

Below are a few Serve 360 success stories from 2018:

Outside of Serve 360, and as part of our ongoing focus on safety, we also announced in 2018 a ramp-up of the deployment of personal alert devices for housekeepers and other on-property associates allowing them to discreetly summon help if they feel harassed in any way, need quick support or spot a guest in distress. We made associate alert devices a new standard across our portfolio of more than 5,000 managed and franchised hotels in the United States and Canada and we are exploring similar technology solutions to meet the needs of our global hotel portfolio and workforce. The rollout is projected to continue through 2020.

Committed to Diversity and Inclusion

At Marriott, one of our core values is putting people first. Since we opened our doors more than 90 years ago, we have remained committed to providing opportunities for everyone. Global diversity and inclusion are integral to not only how we provide an inclusive environment for our associates, but also to how we conduct business every day. Our Respect for All: Putting People First Since 1927 initiative includes a commitment to associate wellbeing. We establish organizational accountability where leaders own the achievement of diversity and inclusion outcomes. As a goal, we look to achieve gender parity by 2025 among our vice presidents and above. We are proud of our efforts to introduce successful diverse and women business owners to potential investment opportunities in the industry. We currently have more than 1,300 diverse-owned hotels, with a goal of 1,500 by 2020. We also recognize the importance of cultivating a

Letter from our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer

diverse-owned supply chain. We aim to reach $1 billion in purchasing from diverse suppliers annually by 2020. We are also working hard to grow cultural competence among our associates. That means working closely with our associates in the 130 countries and territories around the world where we operate and ensuring that they are educated in different cultural norms and protocols to welcome and delight guests.

Stockholder Engagement

Stockholder engagement is also a key focus for our Company. In 2018, we met with nearly 250 institutional investors constituting approximately 50 percent of shares held by institutions. Our Board and management team emphasize transparency in our approach to stockholder communications and seek out engagement and feedback from current and prospective stockholders on corporate strategy, risk management, executive compensation, and corporate governance. We value an open dialogue and exchange of ideas. In a survey of 25 institutional investors completed in 2018, respondents noted that Marriott provides clear and consistent communications, is candid about the opportunities and potential risks to its business, effectively manages investor and analyst expectations, promptly responds to questions and requests for information, and is available at conferences, investor meetings, and Analyst Days. Those respondents represent 30 percent of shares held by institutions. One such engagement resulted in our providing a report on Harassment Prevention on our website that will be updated annually. See https://www.marriott.com/Multimedia/PDF/CorporateResponsibility/Harassment_Prevention_1689590_1.pdf.

Governance Practices

Our success is rooted in good governance. Members of our Board of Directors are committed to the success of the Company, offer diverse experiences and skills, and provide valuable feedback and guidance that position us for success. The Board draws on the depth of experience of long-time members while welcoming new skills and insights from new members. We have an established Board refreshment process that has added seven new Board members in the past five years. Our Board is actively engaged in the Company’s strategy, supports our approach to environmental and social initiatives, and embraces good governance.

Meeting Information

We hope you can join us at our upcoming Annual Stockholders Meeting. The meeting will be held at the JW Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004 on Friday, May 10, 2019, beginning at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Doors to the meeting will open at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

In closing, you have our commitment that in 2019, our Board and management team are focused on leveraging the strong platform that we have built to deliver exceptional service to our guests, provide great opportunities to our associates and owners, and generate outstanding returns for our stockholders.

Sincerely,

J.W. “Bill” Marriott, Jr. Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board		Arne M. Sorenson President and CEO

Corporate Headquarters and Mailing Address    v    10400 Fernwood Road    v    Bethesda, Maryland 20817

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

		How to Vote Your Shares (see pages 1 – 5 for details)
BY TELEPHONE		VIA THE INTERNET		BY MAIL
Using the toll-free phone number listed on the proxy card or voting instruction form		Using the Internet and voting at the website listed on the proxy card or voting instruction form		Signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form in the enclosed postage-paid envelope

To Our Stockholders:

The 2019 annual meeting of stockholders of Marriott International, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Marriott,” or the “Company”) will be held at the JW Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004 on Friday, May 10, 2019, beginning at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Doors to the meeting will open at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time. At the meeting, stockholders will act on the following matters:

Record Date: Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2019, are entitled to notice of and to vote at this meeting.

Distribution Date: This proxy statement is first being made available to our stockholders on or about April 10, 2019.

For the convenience of our stockholders, proxies may be submitted by telephone, electronically through the Internet, or by completing, signing, and returning the enclosed proxy card. In addition, stockholders may elect to receive future stockholder communications, including proxy materials, through the Internet. Instructions for each of these options can be found in the enclosed materials.

Corporate Headquarters and Mailing Address    v    10400 Fernwood Road    v    Bethesda, Maryland 20817

By order of the Board of Directors,

Bancroft S. Gordon

Secretary

April 10, 2019

PLEASE REFER TO THE LAST PAGE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT FOR DIRECTIONS TO THE MEETING AND

INFORMATION ON PARKING, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LODGING.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Questions and Answers about the Meeting

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

2019 Proxy Materials

Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

You received printed versions of these materials because you owned shares of the Company’s Class A common stock on March 15, 2019, the record date, and that entitles you to notice of, and to vote at, the 2019 annual meeting. At our annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters described in the accompanying notice of meeting (the “Notice”). These actions include the election of each of the 14 director nominees, ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (sometimes referred to as the “independent auditor”), an advisory vote to approve executive compensation, approval of each of the proposed amendments to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) to remove supermajority voting standards; a stockholder proposal recommending that stockholders be allowed to act by written consent (if properly presented); and any other matters that may properly be presented at the meeting. In addition, our management will report on the Company’s performance during fiscal year 2018 and respond to questions from stockholders.

What does the Board of Directors (the “Board”) recommend?

The Board’s recommendations are set forth after the description of each item in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote:

Voting Procedures

Who is entitled to vote?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date, March 15, 2019, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. Each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock entitles its holder to cast ten votes on each matter to be voted upon.

How do I vote?

Whether you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner whose shares are held in street name, you can vote in any one of four ways:

Questions and Answers about the Meeting

Telephone and Internet voting is available through 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 9, 2019. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate votes cast by use of a personal identification number. The procedures, which are designed to comply with Delaware law, allow stockholders to appoint a proxy to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.

If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, you may be able to vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet in accordance with the voting instructions provided by that institution. You must obtain a legal proxy from the broker or other nominee that holds your shares if you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee in advance of the annual meeting, your broker will have discretionary authority to vote on “routine matters.” The ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm in Item 2 is the only item on the agenda for the annual meeting that is considered routine. Thus, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee in advance of the annual meeting, your shares will not be voted on Items 1, 3, 4(a) through (e), 5 and any other matters that may properly be voted on at the annual meeting, resulting in “broker non-votes” in an amount equivalent to your shares with respect to these items.

How do I vote my 401(k) shares?

If you participate in Marriott Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), you may give voting instructions as to the number of share equivalents allocated to your account as of the record date. You may provide voting instructions to the trustee under the 401(k) Plan by completing and returning the proxy card accompanying this proxy statement. The trustee will vote the number of shares equal to the share equivalents credited to your account in accordance with your duly executed instructions if they are received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 7, 2019. If you do not send instructions by this deadline or if you do not vote by proxy, or return your proxy card with an unclear voting designation or no voting designation at all, the trustee will vote the number of shares equal to the share equivalents credited to your account in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.

What shares are included on my proxy card(s)?

The shares on your proxy card(s) represent ALL of your shares of Class A common stock that the Company’s stock transfer records indicate that you hold, including (i) any shares you may hold through the Computershare Investor Services Program for Marriott International, Inc. Stockholders administered by Computershare Investor Services; and (ii) if you are a participant in the Marriott Retirement Savings Plan, any shares that may be held for your account by The Northern Trust Company as the plan’s custodian. Shares that you hold in “street name” through a broker or other nominee are not included on the proxy card(s) furnished by the Company, but the institution will provide you with a voting instruction form.

How will my shares be voted?

Your shares will be voted as you indicate on the proxy card. Except as indicated above with respect to shares held in the 401(k) Plan, if you return your signed proxy card but do not mark the boxes indicating how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted FOR the election of each of the 14 director nominees; FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for fiscal year 2019; FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation; FOR the approval of each of the proposed amendments to the Certificate and Bylaws to remove supermajority voting standards; and AGAINST the stockholder resolution recommending that stockholders be allowed to act by written consent.

Who can attend the meeting?

All stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices may not be used at the meeting. Stockholders whose shares are held beneficially through a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other similar organization (that is, in “street name”) also may attend the meeting by obtaining a legal proxy provided by their broker, bank or other organization and bringing that proxy to the meeting.

Questions and Answers about the Meeting

You will find directions to the meeting, and information on parking, public transportation and lodging, on the last page of this proxy statement.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A common stock of the Company outstanding on the record date and entitled to vote will constitute a quorum. A quorum is required for business to be conducted at the meeting. As of the March 15, 2019 record date, 336,694,144 shares of our Class A common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. If you submit a properly executed proxy card, even if you abstain from voting, you will be considered part of the quorum. Similarly, “broker non-votes” (described below) will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

What vote is required to approve each item?

In the election of directors, each nominee must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes in order to be elected as a director. Instructions to “ABSTAIN” and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors.

For (i) ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019; (ii) the advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and (iii) the stockholder resolution recommending that stockholders be allowed to act by written consent if properly presented at the meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the items will be required for approval. Instructions to “ABSTAIN” with respect to these three items will be counted for purposes of determining the number of shares represented and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” these items. Broker non-votes, if any, will not have any effect on the outcome of votes for these items.

For approval of each of the amendments to the Company’s Certificate and Bylaws to remove supermajority voting standards, the affirmative vote of 66 2/3% of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote will be required for approval. Instructions to “ABSTAIN” with respect to any of these amendments will be counted for purposes of determining the number of shares represented and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” these amendments. Broker non-votes will also count as a vote “AGAINST” these amendments.

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy after I return my proxy card, or after I vote by telephone or electronically?

Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised at the meeting. Regardless of the way in which you submitted your original proxy, you may change it by:

If your shares are held through a broker or other nominee, you will need to contact that institution if you wish to change your voting instructions.

Questions and Answers about the Meeting

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Computershare Investor Services, our independent stock transfer agent, will count the votes and act as the inspector of election.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

If your shares are registered under different names or are held in more than one account, you may receive more than one proxy card. In order to vote all your shares, please sign and return all proxy cards, or if you choose, vote by submitting your proxy by telephone or through the Internet using the personal identification number printed on each proxy card. We encourage you to have all accounts registered in the same name and address (whenever possible). You can accomplish this by contacting our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, at 1-800-311-4816.

How will voting on any other business be conducted?

Although we currently do not know of any business to be considered at the 2019 annual meeting other than the items described in this proxy statement, if any other business is properly presented at the annual meeting, your proxy gives authority to J.W. Marriott, Jr. and/or Arne M. Sorenson (with full power of substitution) to vote on such matters at their discretion.

Other

When are stockholder proposals for the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders due?

To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholder proposals must be received at our offices no later than the close of business on December 12, 2019. Proposals must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and must be submitted in writing to the Corporate Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817.

In addition, our Bylaws require that, if a stockholder desires to introduce a stockholder proposal, other than a nomination for the election of directors, from the floor of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, notice of such proposal must be delivered in writing to the Company’s Secretary at the above address no earlier than the close of business on January 11, 2020 and no later than the close of business on February 10, 2020. However, if the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the anniversary date of this year’s annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such meeting or the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the meeting date is first made. If a stockholder desires to nominate a director from the floor of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, our Bylaws require that notice of such nomination be delivered in writing to the Company’s Secretary at the above address no later than February 10, 2020. However, in the event that the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary date of this year’s annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must be so delivered no later than the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to stockholders. The notice of such written proposal or nomination must comply with our Bylaws. The Chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any stockholder proposal or nomination if notice thereof is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with our Bylaws.

If a stockholder or group of stockholders who meet the requirements set forth in our Bylaws wishes to nominate one or more director candidates to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2020 annual meeting through the Company’s proxy access provision, the Company must receive proper written notice of the nomination not less than 120 or more than 150 days before the anniversary date that the definitive proxy statement was first released to stockholders in connection with the immediately preceding annual meeting, or between the close of business on November 12, 2019 and the close of business on December 12, 2019 for the 2020 annual meeting, and the nomination must otherwise comply with our Bylaws. However, in the event that the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date, the stockholder’s notice must be delivered no earlier than the close of business on the 150th day prior to such meeting and no later than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such meeting or the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the meeting date is first made.

Questions and Answers about the Meeting

If a stockholder fails to meet these deadlines or satisfy the requirements of Rule 14a-4 under the Exchange Act, the proxies we solicit allow the named proxyholders, if a vote is taken, to vote on such proposals as they deem appropriate. You can find a copy of our Bylaws in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website (https://marriott.gcs-web.com) by clicking on “Governance” and then “Documents & Charters,” or you may obtain a copy by submitting a request to the Corporate Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817.

Will there be a sign language interpreter at the meeting?

If you would like to have a sign language interpreter at the annual meeting, please send your request in writing to the Corporate Secretary, Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. We must receive your request no later than May 2, 2019.

How much did this proxy solicitation cost and who paid that cost?

The Company paid for this proxy solicitation. We hired MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the distribution of proxy materials and solicitation of votes for an estimated fee of $18,500, plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. We also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders. Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, or other means of communication. Our directors, officers and regular associates who are not specifically employed for proxy solicitation purposes and who will not receive any additional compensation for such activities may also solicit proxies.

Can I receive future stockholder communications electronically through the Internet?

Yes. You may elect to receive future notices of meetings, proxy materials, and annual reports electronically through the Internet. If you have previously consented to electronic delivery, your consent will remain in effect until withdrawn. To consent to electronic delivery:

You may withdraw this consent at any time and resume receiving stockholder communications in print form.

Proxy Statement Summary

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all information you should consider. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Voting matters and the recommendations of the Board

Our director nominees

See “Corporate Governance – Nominees to our Board of Directors” for more information.

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.

Proxy Statement Summary

Corporate governance highlights

See “Corporate Governance” for more information.

		Independent Board and Board committees
		• Chairman and CEO positions separate since 2012; Lead Director appointed in 2013   • Eleven of 14 director nominees are independent   • Audit, Compensation Policy and Nominating and Corporate Governance committee members are independent   • We conduct annual Board and committee evaluations   • We have a mandatory retirement age of 72 for all directors except for J.W. Marriott, Jr.   • We have robust director orientation and continuing education programs for directors   • All Audit Committee members are financially literate and five out of six members are audit committee financial experts   • Our Compensation Policy Committee uses an independent compensation consultant

		Progressive stockholder rights
		• Directors are elected by majority vote in uncontested elections   • All directors are elected annually   • Our Bylaws provide for proxy access by stockholders   • We have a confidential voting policy

 

		Commitment to Board refreshment
		The Board has established a comprehensive Board refreshment process to ensure that the skills, qualifications and diversity of perspectives on our Board are consistent with the needs of the business and that our Board reflects a balance of new and long-term perspectives. We have added seven directors over the past five years (64% of our independent directors).

 

		Strong stockholder support on say-on-pay
		At the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholders again expressed substantial support for the compensation of our NEOs with approximately 98% voting for approval of the “say-on-pay” advisory proposal relating to our 2017 NEO compensation.

 

		Active stockholder engagement
		During fiscal year 2018, management met with nearly 250 institutional investors in individual investor meetings, at conferences and at our Security Analyst Meeting. These investors represent approximately 50% of our institutional investor base.

Proxy Statement Summary

Executive compensation matters

Marriott’s meaningful growth momentum across its portfolio of brands continued in 2018, as hotel owners increasingly chose to partner with Marriott’s teams, leading business platforms, unmatched global scale and captivating brands. We rapidly grew our newly unified Marriott Bonvoy^TM travel program which now stands at nearly 125 million members. And our financial and operating performance was strong: reported earnings per share grew by 40%; we exceeded our target adjusted EPS performance measure under our annual cash incentive program; and we returned nearly $3.4 billion to stockholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases. Strong room growth continued with record new signings for over 800 properties and new openings of nearly 500 properties, an overall portfolio of over 1.3 million rooms open in 130 countries and territories, and a new record of more than 478,000 rooms in our development pipeline. Finally, we achieved record-setting associate engagement compared to external benchmarks and were recognized as one of the Fortune Best Companies to Work for in 2018 for the 21st consecutive year.

How We Tie Pay to Performance

There is a strong correlation between our executive pay and Company performance. Our executive compensation program is designed to maintain this alignment, while also protecting the Company against inappropriate risk-taking and conflicts among the interests of the Company, its stockholders and its executives. With these goals in mind, the Compensation Policy Committee has implemented an executive compensation program that consists of the following key components:

Total Target Direct Compensation Base Salary Reviewed annually and set based on market data, internal equity, tenure and individual performance considerations. Annual Incentive Based on achievement of a pre-established adjusted EPS target and a combination of other financial and business operational performance measures tailored for each executive's area of responsibility. Equity Compensation The majority of each NEO's total pay opportunity consists of long-term equity awards, using a mix of three-year vesting Performance Share Units ("PSUs"), Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") and Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs").

Proxy Statement Summary

Focus on Performance-Based Awards

The following charts show the percentage breakdown of target total direct compensation between performance-based (target annual incentive, PSUs and SARs) and service-based pay elements (base salary, RSUs and other) for 2018.

Majority of Compensation is Equity

The following charts show the percentage breakdown of target total direct compensation among base salary, target annual incentive, and target annual equity compensation.

President & CEO Average of Other NEOs

Alignment Between Company Performance and Annual Realizable Pay

The following graph shows the historical alignment between Company performance (measured as total stockholder return (“TSR”)) and the CEO’s average annual Realizable Pay (as defined below) over 3-year rolling periods.

CEO Realizable Pay and Company TSR Performance

Proxy Statement Summary

Executive Compensation Best Practices

Consistent with our commitment to executive compensation best practices, the Company continued the following NEO compensation practices for 2018:

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Policy Committee consisted of Steven S Reinemund (Chair), Mary K. Bush, Eric Hippeau, Aylwin B. Lewis (appointed on May 4, 2018) and Susan C. Schwab. None of the members of the Compensation Policy Committee has any relationship with the Company required to be reported under SEC or Nasdaq Listing Standards, including as an officer or employee of the Company or as a participant in a related party transaction with the Company.

Proxy Statement Summary

Enterprise risk management matters

In November 2018, Marriott announced that it had determined that there was unauthorized access to the legacy Starwood guest reservation database (the “Data Security Incident”). As detailed in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Marriott believes that the upper limit for the total number of guest records involved in the Data Security Incident was approximately 383 million records, and that the information accessed by an unauthorized third party included approximately 5.25 million unencrypted passport numbers, approximately 18.5 million encrypted passport numbers and approximately 9.1 million encrypted payment card numbers. The Company also disclosed that the information accessed by an unauthorized third party could include several thousand unencrypted payment card numbers.

How our Company took action

In response to the Data Security Incident, the Company took extensive action to contain and remove threats identified during its investigation, support guests and mitigate future risks. Key actions included:

We believe that the actions taken by the Company to address the incident have successfully addressed guest concerns. We have seen a steady decline in customer call volume regarding the Data Security Incident since December 2018, and we have not seen a meaningful impact on demand as a result of the incident.

How our Board took action

Our Board took a leadership role in addressing the data security incident, including:

Items to be Voted On

ITEMS TO BE VOTED ON

ITEM 1 – Election of Directors

All of our directors are standing for election at the 2019 annual meeting and, if elected, each director will hold office for a term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is elected or appointed and qualified.

You can find information on the director nominees beginning on page 23.

Each of the director nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. However, if before proxies are voted at the annual meeting any of the nominees should become unable to serve or will not serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board designates a substitute nominee, the persons named as proxies will vote “FOR” that substitute nominee.

Earlier this year, Land & Buildings Capital Growth Fund, LP (“L&B”), a stockholder of the Company, delivered a letter notifying the Company of the nomination of Jonathan Litt for election to the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. L&B subsequently irrevocably withdrew the nomination. The Board will consider in due course matters regarding Board size and composition, and will consider the input of stockholders (including L&B) regarding these matters provided as part of our ongoing stockholder engagement.

The Company’s Bylaws prescribe the voting standard for election of directors as a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, such as this one, where the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected. Under this standard, a nominee must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes in order to be elected as a director.

In a contested election, where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected (which is not the case at the 2019 annual meeting), the directors will be elected by a plurality of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Under the Company’s Governance Principles, if a nominee who already serves as a director is not elected, that nominee shall tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Within 90 days of the certification of election results, the Board will determine whether to accept or reject the resignation and will publicly disclose its decision promptly thereafter.

ITEM 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019. Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since May 3, 2002. Ernst & Young LLP will examine and report to stockholders on the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its subsidiaries.

We expect that representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting, have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and be available to respond to appropriate questions. You can find information on pre-approval of independent auditor fees and Ernst & Young LLP’s fiscal years 2018 and 2017 fees beginning on page 35. Although the Audit Committee has discretionary authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Board is seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment of the independent auditors as a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee will take that into consideration when determining whether to continue the firm’s engagement.

Items to be Voted On

ITEM 3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

We are asking stockholders to approve a non-binding advisory resolution on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), as disclosed in this proxy statement.

Although the resolution, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is non-binding, the Board and Compensation Policy Committee value your opinions and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. After consideration of the vote of stockholders at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and consistent with the Board’s recommendation, the Board’s current policy is to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis, and accordingly, after the 2019 annual meeting, the next advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs is expected to occur at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) beginning on page 37 of this proxy statement, which describes in detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, appearing on pages 49 through 63 which provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs.

The Board believes that our current executive compensation program achieves an appropriate balance of long- and short-term performance incentives, reinforces the link between executive pay and the Company’s long-term performance and stock value, and thereby aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and as a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2019 annual meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Marriott International, Inc. (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 4 – Approval of Proposed Amendments to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Remove Supermajority Voting Standards

The Certificate and Bylaws currently require the approval of the holders of 66 2/3% of the Company’s outstanding shares for certain fundamental changes to the Company’s corporate governance. This Item 4 is a result of the Board’s ongoing review of our corporate governance practices and a non-binding stockholder proposal to remove these supermajority voting requirements that received support from a majority of the votes cast at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting. After considering corporate governance best practices for our stockholders, balancing the competing interests discussed below and taking into account last year’s stockholder vote, the Board has approved resolutions declaring it advisable to amend the Certificate and, subject to the filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment setting forth certain amendments to the Certificate (as described below) approved by the stockholders, the Bylaws to eliminate each voting requirement that calls for a supermajority vote and make certain related amendments (the “Proposed Amendments”). The Proposed Amendments are set forth in Items 4(a) to 4(e) below, which will be voted on separately. The vote required to approve each of the Proposed Amendments is discussed in each Item. Approval of any Item is not conditioned upon approval of the other Items.

Purpose and Effect of the Proposed Amendments

The Board continually evaluates the implementation of appropriate corporate governance measures. In this regard, the Board has evaluated the Company’s voting requirements in the past and has consistently determined that the retention of a supermajority vote standard for certain fundamental changes to the Company’s corporate governance was the best way to protect the interests of all stockholders. The Board believes that fundamental changes to corporate governance should have the support of a broad consensus of all stockholders. However, if the Proposed Amendments are approved, a relatively small number of stockholders could enact significant corporate changes that benefit only a

Items to be Voted On

narrow group of stockholders. Supermajority voting requirements on fundamental corporate matters also help protect stockholders against self-interested and potentially abusive transactions proposed by certain stockholders who may seek to advance their interests over the interests of the majority of the Company’s stockholders. For example, if Item 4(e) below is implemented, certain transactions between the Company and “Interested Stockholders” (as defined in the Certificate, which include stockholders who beneficially own, and affiliates of the Company that at any time in the two years preceding such a transaction have beneficially owned, at least 25% of the voting power of the Company’s Voting Stock) could be approved by only a majority vote. In contrast, the current supermajority voting standard could encourage Interested Stockholders to negotiate transaction terms that take into account the interests of all of the Company’s stockholders and that do not sacrifice the long-term success of the Company for short-term benefits.

On the other hand, the Board is aware that certain stockholders and institutions disagree. These entities generally argue that a majority vote should be sufficient for any corporate action requiring stockholder approval, regardless of the considerations outlined above. This Item 4 reflects the Board’s determination to acknowledge, and address, that difference in perspective.

Overview of Proposed Amendments

Our Certificate currently contains supermajority voting requirements for the removal of directors with or without cause, for stockholders to amend certain articles in the Certificate, for stockholders to amend certain sections of the Bylaws, for the approval of certain transactions and for the approval of certain business combinations. Our Bylaws currently contain supermajority voting requirements for the removal of directors with or without cause and for stockholders to amend certain sections of the Bylaws. More information on the Proposed Amendments to remove the supermajority voting standards in these provisions is set forth in the descriptions of Items 4(a) through 4(e) below.

Item 4(a): Amendments to Remove the Supermajority Voting Standard for the Removal of Directors

Description of Amendment. Currently, the fourth paragraph of Article EIGHTH of the Certificate and the last sentence of Section 3.2 of Article III of the Bylaws provide that a director can be removed from office, with or without cause, only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. This Item 4(a) requests that stockholders approve an amendment to delete the supermajority voting requirement for the removal of directors in (i) the fourth paragraph of Article EIGHTH of the Certificate and (ii) subject to the filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment setting forth the proposed amendment to the Certificate described in clause (i), the last sentence of Section 3.2 of Article III of the Bylaws. As a result of the amendments, the voting standard set forth in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) would apply to the removal of directors, which would require approval of the holders of a majority of shares outstanding and entitled to vote at an election of directors.

Vote Required to Approve. Under the Certificate and Bylaws, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to approve the amendments set forth in this Item 4(a).

Item 4(b): Amendments to Remove the Supermajority Voting Standards for Future Amendments to the Certificate Approved by Our Stockholders

Description of Amendments. Currently, the Certificate states that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to alter, amend or adopt any provision inconsistent with or repeal the following Articles of the Certificate:

Items to be Voted On

This Item 4(b) requests that stockholders approve amendments to the Certificate to delete the last sentence in the fourth paragraph of Article EIGHTH, the last sentence in Article THIRTEENTH, the last sentence in Article FOURTEENTH and the last sentence in Article FIFTEENTH of the Certificate. As a result of such amendments, the voting standard set forth in the DGCL would apply, which would mean that future amendments to these articles in the Certificate would require approval by the holders of a majority of shares outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

Vote Required to Approve. Under the Certificate, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to approve the amendments set forth in this Item 4(b).

Item 4(c): Amendments to Remove the Requirement for a Supermajority Stockholder Vote for Future Amendments to Certain Bylaw Provisions

Description of Amendments. Currently, pursuant to Article FOURTEENTH of the Certificate and Section 8.1 of Article VIII of the Bylaws, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required in order to alter, amend or repeal or adopt a provision inconsistent with the following provisions in the Bylaws:

This Item 4(c) requests that stockholders approve amendments to (i) Article FOURTEENTH of the Certificate and (ii) subject to the filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment setting forth the proposed amendment to the Certificate described in clause (i), Section 8.1 of Article VIII of the Bylaws, to remove the requirements that a supermajority stockholder vote approve future amendments to Sections 3.1, 3.2, and 3.13 of Article III, Article VIII and Article IX of the Bylaws. If approved, future amendments to these sections of the Bylaws could be approved either by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares represented and entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of amending the Bylaws, or by the Board acting unilaterally.

Vote Required to Approve. Under the Certificate and the Bylaws, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to approve the Certificate and Bylaw amendments addressed in this Item 4(c).

Item 4(d): Amendment to Remove the Requirement for a Supermajority Stockholder Vote for Certain Transactions

Description of Amendment. Currently, Article TWELFTH of the Certificate states that the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing not less than 66 2/3% of the voting power of the Company will be required for the approval of any proposal for the Company to engage in certain significant transactions, including a reorganization, merger, or consolidation with any other company, or sale, lease, or an exchange of substantially all of the assets or business of the Company. The last sentence in Article TWELFTH further states that the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of the Company is required to alter, amend or adopt any provision inconsistent with or repeal Article TWELFTH. This Item 4(d) requests that stockholders approve an amendment to delete the entire Article TWELFTH so that the default voting standard in the DGCL, if any, will apply to the transactions described above. As a result, such transactions that must be approved by stockholders pursuant to the DGCL generally would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. For example, mergers and consolidations that must be approved by stockholders would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. However, consistent with the DGCL, other mergers would not require a vote of stockholders. For example, the DGCL provides that stockholders need not approve certain short-form mergers, holding company reorganization mergers, certain mergers involving the issuance of less than 20% of the company’s stock and certain back-end mergers following a successful tender offer.

Vote Required to Approve. Under the Certificate, the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of the Company is required to approve the amendment set forth in this Item 4(d).

Items to be Voted On

Item 4(e): Amendment to Remove the Supermajority Voting Standard for Certain Business Combinations

Description of Amendment. Currently, Article FIFTEENTH of the Certificate states that, in addition to any affirmative vote required by law, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required for the approval of certain transactions with any Interested Stockholder (as defined in the Certificate, which includes any direct or indirect beneficial owner of more than 25% of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding Voting Stock). Covered transactions include any merger or consolidation, any sale or other disposition of assets of the Company having an aggregate fair market value of $15 million or more, issuance of any securities of the Company to any Interested Stockholder having an aggregate fair market value of $15 million or more, adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company proposed by the Interested Stockholder or any reclassification of securities or recapitalization of the Company or any merger or consolidation (whether or not with or into or otherwise involving the Interested Stockholder) that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the outstanding shares owned by the Interested Stockholder. This Item 4(e) requests that stockholders approve an amendment to replace the reference to “66 2/3%” in the business combination provision in Article FIFTEENTH with “a majority.” As a result of the amendment, as set forth in the Certificate, certain business combinations (as defined in the Certificate) with an Interested Stockholder would require approval of the holders of a majority of shares outstanding and entitled to vote at an election of directors.

Vote Required to Approve. Under the Certificate, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to approve the amendment set forth in this Item 4(e).

Additional Information

The full text of the Proposed Amendments, in each case marked to show the proposed deletions and insertions, is set forth in Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement. The general description of provisions of our Certificate and Bylaws and the Proposed Amendments set forth herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text of Exhibit B. You can find a copy of our Certificate and our Bylaws in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website (https://marriott.gcs-web.com) by clicking on “Governance” and then “Documents & Charters.”

If stockholders approve any of the Proposed Amendments by the requisite vote, we will file a Certificate of Amendment that includes only those amendments that were approved by the stockholders with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware following the annual meeting. The Certificate of Amendment and any corresponding Bylaw amendments that are approved will become effective upon acceptance of the filing by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. For any Proposed Amendment that does not receive the requisite vote, that Proposed Amendment will not be implemented and the Company’s current voting standards relating to such Proposed Amendment will remain in place.

ITEM 5 – Stockholder Resolution Recommending That Stockholders Be Allowed to Act by Written Consent

Myra K. Young (the “proponent”) of 9295 Yorkship Ct, Elk Grove, CA 95758 (the beneficial owner of 75 shares of our Class A common stock), has advised the Company that she plans to present the following proposal at the annual meeting. If properly presented at the annual meeting by or on behalf of the proponent, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “AGAINST” the following stockholder resolution. We have included the proponent’s proposal in this proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules, and the Board’s response to it follows.

The Proponent’s Proposal

Proposal 5 – Right to Act by Written Consent

Resolved, Marriott International (“Marriott” or “Company”) shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

Items to be Voted On

Supporting Statement: Shareholder rights to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are two complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. This is important because there could be 15-months between annual meetings.

A shareholder right to act by written consent is one method to equalize our restricted provisions for shareholders to call a special meeting. For instance it will take investors with 25% shares at our company to call a special meeting if the board finally acts on their proposal that passed at Marriott’s meeting in May 2018. Many companies allow investors with 10% of shares to call a special meeting. Additionally, 65% of shares voted to adopt a simple majority voting standard at the same May 2018 but that standard has not been implemented.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67% support at both Allstate and Sprint. Last year the topic won majority votes at Gilead Sciences, Netflix, Kansas City Southern, Newell Brands, L3 Technologies, Eastern Chemical Company, and HP.

Hundreds of major companies enable shareholders to act by written consent, including 70% of the S&P 500 and 73% of the S&P 1500.

Increase Shareholder Value

Vote for Right to Act by Written Consent – Proposal 5

Board Response

The Board will oppose this proposal if it is properly presented at the 2019 annual meeting and recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

The Board recommends voting “AGAINST” this advisory proposal requesting that the Company take steps to allow stockholders to act by written consent. After careful consideration, the Board believes that the ability to act by written consent is neither necessary nor in our stockholders’ best interests in light of the Company’s existing strong governance structure and practices.

Stockholder Action at Meetings Promotes Transparency and Fairness

The transparency and fairness of the stockholder meeting process supports all stockholders’ interests and offers important protections that are absent from the written consent process proposed in this stockholder proposal. Specifically, by requiring that stockholders receive advance notice of the date, time and agenda for an annual or special meeting, the Company’s governing documents provide all stockholders a meaningful opportunity to consider proposed actions and express their views. In contrast, this stockholder proposal would allow a limited number of stockholders to act on significant matters without providing advance notice to all stockholders or the opportunity to exchange views with the Board and each other before stockholder action is taken. This could enable significant stockholders to act to further their self-interest without giving a voice to the Company’s other stockholders. Therefore, a written consent process could deprive some stockholders of the critical opportunity to assess, discuss, deliberate and vote on pending actions that may have important ramifications for the Company and its stockholders.

In addition, stockholder action by written consent could create significant confusion and inefficiency for a widely held public company like Marriott. Under the stockholder proposal, multiple groups of stockholders could solicit written consents at any time on duplicative or contradictory matters. In addition to causing stockholder confusion, that process would impose significant administrative and financial burdens on the Company.

Our Stockholders Already Can Raise Matters Outside of the Annual Meeting Cycle

The Board has demonstrated its commitment to active stockholder engagement and responsiveness to stockholder feedback. As detailed in this proxy statement, stockholder engagement is a key focus for the Company, and it allows stockholders to raise matters with the Company outside of the annual meeting cycle. Moreover, the Company emphasizes transparency in its approach to stockholder communications and seeks out engagement and feedback from current and prospective stockholders on a variety of issues. In 2018, the Company met with over 300 institutional investors. Stockholders also can request that the Board call a special meeting outside of the annual meeting cycle.

Items to be Voted On

Our Stockholders Rejected Special Meeting Proposals in 2018

In addition, stockholders were presented with but did not approve creating further meaningful opportunities to raise matters for consideration outside of the annual meeting cycle. At the Company’s 2018 annual meeting, stockholders voted on two special meeting proposals – a proposal approved by the Board and recommended to stockholders to allow holders of at least 25% of outstanding shares to call special meetings, and a stockholder proposal to allow holders of at least 15% of outstanding shares to call special meetings. The proponent incorrectly states that the Board’s 25% threshold proposal was approved; in fact, Marriott stockholders rejected both the Board’s proposal and the stockholder proposal. We believe that these voting results reflect the view of some stockholders that they already have meaningful, year-round opportunities to bring matters to the attention of the Company, the Board and other stockholders.

The Stockholder Proposal Is Unnecessary Given Our Strong and Effective Corporate Governance Policies and Practices

This stockholder proposal also is unnecessary given our commitment to strong and effective corporate governance principles and high ethical standards. The Company maintains robust governance practices that promote Board accountability, including:

In addition, in this proxy statement, following a majority of votes cast in favor of a similar stockholder proposal in 2018 and as set forth in Item 4, the Board has approved and recommended that stockholders approve each of the amendments to the Company’s governing documents to remove all supermajority standards in the Company’s Certificate and Bylaws. These practices underscore the Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance practices. This commitment has been recognized by independent third parties, including by Corporate Secretary magazine, which named the Company a finalist in the category of “Governance Team of the Year (large cap)” in 2016, and by the Ethisphere Institute, which named Marriott among the “World’s Most Ethical Companies” in 2018, for the eleventh year.

In summary, the Board believes that the Company’s strong corporate governance practices and the Company’s extensive stockholder outreach program provide the appropriate means to advance stockholders’ interests without potentially disenfranchising some stockholders or creating confusion and significant administrative and financial burdens for the Company. These practices allow the Board to oversee the Company’s business and affairs for the benefit of all stockholders while avoiding the risks associated with stockholder action by written consent. The significant concerns with action by written consent are reflected in the fact that the vast majority of S&P 500 companies (70% of the 469 S&P 500 companies surveyed by FactSet as of February 2019) either do not provide stockholders with the right to act by written consent or limit its use to unanimous written consent.

Corporate Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership Structure

While the Board has not mandated a particular leadership structure, effective March 31, 2012, the Board determined that the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be held by separate individuals. The Board elected J.W. Marriott, Jr., who had served as the Chairman and CEO of the Company and its predecessors since 1985, to the position of Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board, and Arne M. Sorenson, the former President and Chief Operating Officer, to the position of President and CEO. In his current role, Mr. Marriott continues to provide leadership to the Board by, among other things, working with the CEO, the independent Lead Director (discussed below), and the Corporate Secretary to set Board calendars, determine agendas for Board meetings, ensure proper flow of information to Board members, facilitate effective operation of the Board and its committees, help promote Board succession planning and the orientation of new directors, address issues of director performance, assist in consideration and Board adoption of the Company’s long-term and annual operating plans, and help promote senior management succession planning.

In 2013, the Board created the position of Lead Director and prescribed that he/she should be the independent Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Lawrence W. Kellner currently serves in those positions. The Lead Director’s responsibilities include chairing the executive sessions of the independent directors, coordinating the activities of the independent directors, having the authority to convene meetings of the independent directors, and serving as a liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors. The Lead Director also is a standing member of the Company’s Executive Committee. The Lead Director also reviews Board meeting agendas, coordinates the evaluation of Board and Committee performance, coordinates the assessment and evaluation of Board candidates, makes recommendations for changes to the Company’s governance practices, and is available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders. We believe that the role played by the Lead Director provides strong, independent Board leadership.

Eleven of our 14 director nominees are independent, and the Audit, Compensation Policy and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are composed solely of independent directors. Consequently, the independent directors directly oversee such critical items as the Company’s financial statements, executive compensation, the selection and evaluation of directors and the development and implementation of our corporate governance programs.

The Board will continue to review our Board leadership structure as part of the succession planning process that is described in our Governance Principles. We believe that our leadership structure, in which the roles of Chairman and CEO are separate, together with an experienced and engaged Lead Director and independent key committees, is and will continue to be effective and is the optimal structure for our Company and our stockholders.

Selection of Director Nominees

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for Board membership suggested by its members, other Board members, management, and stockholders. As a stockholder, you may recommend any person for consideration as a nominee for director by writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o Marriott International, Inc., Department 52/862, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. Recommendations must include the name and address of the stockholder making the recommendation, a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of Class A common stock, biographical information about the individual recommended and any other information the stockholder believes would be helpful to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating the individual recommended.

Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a candidate, the Committee evaluates the candidate against the qualifications set out in the Company’s Governance Principles, including:

Corporate Governance

In addition, while the Committee does not maintain a formal diversity policy for Board membership, it may consider diversity in identifying candidates for the Board as one of several criteria that it uses as part of that process. The Committee assesses the effectiveness of its Board membership criteria in evaluating the composition of the Board. The Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to any persons it believes should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Committee. The procedures for considering candidates recommended by a stockholder for Board membership are consistent with the procedures for candidates recommended by members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other members of the Board or management. From time to time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains executive search and board advisory consulting firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. During 2018, the Committee used the services of Russell Reynolds Associates, a third-party executive search firm, for this purpose.

The graphics below provide a snapshot of our Board composition, tenure, independence, and skills:

Board Diversity 11 yrs average tenure Tenure Gender and Race 50% (7 out of 14 members of the Board are women or minorities) Directors Independence 79% (11 out of 14 members of the Board) Board Skills Financial 64% (9 out of 14 members of the Board) Global Business 50% (7 out of 14 members of the Board) Corporate 57% (8 out of 14 members of the Board) Leadership 100% (14 out of 14 members of the Board) Investment / Legal 36% (5 out of 14 members of the Board) Business Knowledge/ Strategy 64% (9 out of 14 members of the Board)

Corporate Governance

Nominees to our Board of Directors

Each of the following director nominees presently serves on our Board and their term of office will expire at the 2019 annual meeting. The age shown below for each director nominee is as of May 10, 2019, which is the date of the annual meeting. Each director nominee has been nominated to serve until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Set forth below is each director nominee’s biography as well as the qualifications and experiences each director nominee brings to our Board, in addition to the general qualifications discussed above.

Skills and Qualifications:

As a result of his service as CEO of the Company for 40 years, Mr. Marriott brings to the Board and our Executive Committee, which he chairs, extensive leadership experience with, and knowledge of, the Company’s business and strategy as well as a historical perspective on the Company’s growth and operations. Mr. Marriott’s iconic status in the hospitality industry provides a unique advantage to the Company.

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Bush brings to the Board, our Audit Committee and our Compensation Policy Committee extensive financial, international and U.S. government experience, her knowledge of corporate governance and financial oversight gained from her membership on the boards of other public companies, knowledge of public policy matters and capital markets and her significant experience in international arenas.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

As the Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer of First Industrial Realty and former Chief Executive Officer of EQR, Mr. Duncan brings to the Board and our Audit Committee extensive experience in real estate matters and investment strategy, as well as valuable experience as Chief Executive Officer of other publicly traded companies. He also brings a deep understanding of the hospitality industry as a result of his extensive tenure with Starwood, including as the interim Chief Executive Officer of Starwood.

Skills and Qualifications:

As the daughter of the Executive Chairman and the granddaughter of Marriott International’s founders, Mrs. Harrison brings to our Board and our Committee for Excellence an extensive knowledge of the Company, its history, its culture and its mission. Mrs. Harrison’s enthusiasm, judgment and deep experience with our Company and our culture provides the Board valuable insight and strategic focus.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Henderson’s significant accounting skills, experience in leading the initial public offering of a subsidiary of a public company, and expertise in large organization management and emerging markets, make him a valuable member of the Board and our Audit Committee, which he chairs. During his tenure as President and CEO of GM, that company filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not believe that this proceeding is material to the evaluation of Mr. Henderson’s ability to serve as a director.

Skills and Qualifications:

As the Managing Partner of Lerer Hippeau, Mr. Hippeau brings to the Board and our Compensation Policy Committee extensive investment and venture capital expertise. In addition, Mr. Hippeau has significant governance experience as a director, a strong background in technology and modern media and a deep understanding of the hospitality industry as the result of his tenure with Starwood.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Kellner is our Lead Director and brings to the Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which he chairs, and our Executive Committee experience as CEO of one of the largest airline companies in the world with significant management, strategic and operational responsibilities in the travel and leisure industry. He also provides extensive knowledge in the fields of finance and accounting gained from his background as Chief Financial Officer at Continental and other companies.

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Lee provides our Board, our Committee for Excellence, which she chairs, and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with proven leadership and business experience as the former CEO of a major media and entertainment company, extensive management and corporate governance experience gained from that role as well as from her membership on the boards of other public companies, her legal experience, and insights gained from her extensive involvement in civic, community and charitable activities.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

As a result of his numerous senior management positions at Yum! Brands, Kmart, Sears and Potbelly Corporation, Mr. Lewis brings to the Board and our Audit Committee significant expertise in corporate branding, franchising and management of complex global businesses.

Skills and Qualifications:

As a result of her extensive experience managing large groups of employees, complex processes and enterprise-critical technology, Ms. McCarthy brings to the Board valuable insights into areas of critical import to the operations of the Company.

Ms. McCarthy was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by a third-party search firm that conducted a search on behalf of the Company.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Muñoz provides our Board, our Audit Committee and our Committee for Excellence with extensive knowledge in the fields of finance and accounting, his knowledge of international markets, legal experience, corporate governance experience and audit oversight experience gained from his membership on the boards and audit committees of other public companies.

Skills and Qualifications:

As a result of his background as Chairman and CEO of PepsiCo, a Fortune 500 company, Mr. Reinemund brings to the Board, our Compensation Policy Committee, which he chairs, our Executive Committee, and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee demonstrated leadership capability and extensive knowledge of complex financial and operational issues facing large branded companies, as well as extensive management and corporate governance experience gained from that role and from membership on the boards of other public companies.

Corporate Governance

Skills and Qualifications:

Ambassador Schwab brings unique global and governmental perspectives to the Board’s deliberations. Her extensive experience leading large international trade negotiations positions her well to advise her fellow directors and our senior management on a wide range of key global issues facing the Company. Ambassador Schwab’s experience in the U.S. Government also allows her to advise the Company on the many challenges and opportunities that relate to government relations. As a result of Ambassador Schwab’s prior business experience and current service on other Fortune 100 corporate boards, she brings expertise to the Board and our Compensation Policy Committee on a wide range of strategic, operational, corporate governance and compensation matters.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Sorenson brings to the Board, our Committee for Excellence and our Executive Committee extensive management experience with the Company, his prominent status in the hospitality industry and a wealth of knowledge in dealing with financial and accounting matters as a result of his prior service as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

Directors Emeriti:

Sterling D. Colton, a former director of the Company’s predecessors, and William J. Shaw, a former director and Vice Chairman of the Company, both hold the title of director emeritus, but do not vote at or attend Board meetings and are not nominees for election.

Board Meetings and Attendance

The Board met six times in fiscal year 2018. The Company encourages all directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All directors then currently serving attended the Company’s 2018 annual meeting. During fiscal 2018, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which such director served.

Corporate Governance

Governance Principles

The Board has adopted Governance Principles that provide a framework for our governance processes. The portion of our Governance Principles addressing director independence appears below, and the full text of the Governance Principles can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website (https://marriott.gcs-web.com) by clicking on “Governance” and then “Documents & Charters.” You also may request a copy from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Our Governance Principles establish the limit on the number of board memberships for the Company’s directors at three, including Marriott, for directors who are chief executive officers of public companies, and five for other directors. Additionally, our Governance Principles provide that members of our Audit Committee should not serve on more than three audit committees of public companies, including Marriott’s Audit Committee.

Director Independence

Our Governance Principles include the following standards for director independence:

5. Independence of Directors. At least two-thirds of the directors shall be independent, provided that having fewer independent directors due to the departure, addition or change in independent status of one or more directors is permissible temporarily, so long as the two-thirds requirement is again satisfied by the later of the next annual meeting of stockholders or nine months. To be considered “independent,” the board must determine that a director has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of Marriott. The board has established the guidelines set forth below to assist it in determining director independence. For the purpose of this section 5, references to “Marriott” include any of Marriott’s consolidated subsidiaries.

a. A director is not independent if (i) the director is, or has been within the preceding three years, employed by Marriott; (ii) the director or an immediate family member is a current partner or employee of Marriott’s independent auditor, or was a partner or employee of Marriott’s independent auditor and worked on the audit of Marriott at any time during the past three years; (iii) an immediate family member of the director is, or has been within the preceding three years, employed by Marriott as an executive officer; (iv) the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the preceding three years, part of an interlocking directorate in which the director or an immediate family member is employed as an executive officer of another company where at any time during the last three years an executive officer of Marriott at the same time serves on the compensation committee of that other company; (v) the director has accepted, or an immediate family member has accepted, during any 12-month period within the preceding three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from Marriott, other than compensation for board or board committee service, compensation paid to an immediate family member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of Marriott, or benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation; (vi) the director or an immediate family member is an executive officer of a charitable organization to which Marriott made discretionary charitable contributions in the current or any of the last three fiscal years that exceed five percent of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more; or (vii) the director or an immediate family member is a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or current executive officer of, any organization to which Marriott made, or from which Marriott received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the last three fiscal years that exceed five percent of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than payments arising solely from investments in Marriott securities or payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs.

b. The following commercial or charitable relationships are not relationships that would impair a Marriott director’s independence: (i) service as an executive officer of another company which is indebted to Marriott, or to which Marriott is indebted, where the total amount of either company’s indebtedness to the other is less than two percent of the total consolidated assets of the other company; and (ii) service by a Marriott director or his or her immediate family member as director or trustee of a charitable organization, where Marriott’s discretionary charitable contributions to that organization are in an amount equal to or less than the greater of $200,000 or five percent of that organization’s consolidated gross annual revenues. The board annually reviews all commercial and charitable relationships of directors, and publishes whether directors previously identified as independent continue to satisfy the foregoing tests.

c. For relationships not covered by the guidelines in paragraph (b) above, the determination of whether the relationship would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of Marriott, and therefore whether the director would be independent, shall be made by the directors who satisfy the independence guidelines set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) above.

Corporate Governance

The Board undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2019 and reviewed the independence of Ms. McCarthy in connection with her election to the Board in March 2019. As provided in the Governance Principles, the purpose of these reviews is to determine whether any relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that the director or nominee is independent. During these reviews, the Board recognized the current employment of J.W. Marriott, Jr., Mrs. Harrison, and Mr. Sorenson and the family relationships of J.W. Marriott, Jr. and Mrs. Harrison with other Company executives. The Board considered that Ms. Bush, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Kellner, Ms. Lee, Mr. Lewis, Ms. McCarthy, Mr. Muñoz, Mr. Reinemund, and Ambassador Schwab each serve, or recently served, as directors or executive officers of companies that do business with Marriott and that, in each case, the payments to and from Marriott were significantly less than the thresholds in Marriott’s Governance Principles. The Board further considered that Ms. Bush, Ms. Lee and Ambassador Schwab are affiliated with charitable organizations that received contributions from The J. Willard & Alice S. Marriott Foundation and that the contribution amounts were significantly below the charitable contribution threshold set forth in Marriott’s Governance Principles.

Based on the standards set forth in the Governance Principles and after reviewing the relationships described above, the Board affirmatively determined that Ms. Bush, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Hippeau, Mr. Kellner, Ms. Lee, Mr. Lewis, Ms. McCarthy, Mr. Muñoz, Mr. Reinemund, and Ambassador Schwab are each independent of the Company and its management. In addition, the Board affirmatively determined that W. Mitt Romney was independent of the Company and its management during the time he served as a director in 2018 prior to his resignation from the Board in November 2018. J.W. Marriott, Jr., Deborah M. Harrison, and Arne M. Sorenson are considered not independent as a result of their employment with the Company and/or family relationships.

Committees of the Board

The Board has five standing committees: Audit, Compensation Policy, Nominating and Corporate Governance, Committee for Excellence, and Executive. The Board has adopted a written charter for each committee, and those charters are available on the Investor Relations section of our website (https://marriott.gcs-web.com) by clicking on “Governance” and then “Documents & Charters.” You also may request copies of the committee charters from the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Finance Committee, which met three times in fiscal 2018, was dissolved in November 2018 upon the Board’s determination that it had completed its assigned tasks.

Audit Committee

Responsibilities include:

Corporate Governance

In the 2018 fourth quarter, we identified deficiencies in the design of internal control over financial reporting for our Loyalty Program relating to both the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and the integration of the Starwood Preferred Guest and Marriott Rewards programs. The errors were not material to our financial statements, but we concluded that they did constitute a material weakness.

The Audit Committee, working together with our management team, oversaw the implementation of a remediation plan that includes:

The Board is committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and implementing measures designed to help ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated as soon as possible.

Compensation Policy Committee

Members: Steven S Reinemund (Chair), Mary K. Bush, Eric Hippeau, Aylwin B. Lewis and Susan C. Schwab.

Responsibilities include:

The Compensation Policy Committee may delegate to one or more executive officers or directors the authority to grant stock awards to certain associates, subject to the terms of our stock plans.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Members:      Lawrence W. Kellner (Chair), Frederick A. Henderson, Debra L. Lee and Steven S Reinemund.

Corporate Governance

Responsibilities include:

Committee for Excellence

Responsibilities include:

Executive Committee

Responsibilities include:

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Policy Committee consisted of Steven S Reinemund (Chair), Mary K. Bush, Eric Hippeau, Aylwin B. Lewis and Susan C. Schwab, and none of the members of the Compensation Policy Committee is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or had any relationship that is required to be disclosed as a transaction with a related party.

Meetings of Independent Directors

Company policy requires that the independent directors meet without management present at least twice a year. In 2018, the independent directors met five times without management present. The Lead Director, currently Mr. Kellner, presides at the meetings of the independent directors.

Corporate Governance

Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s processes for assessing and managing risk. The Board considers our risk profile when reviewing our annual business plan and incorporates risk assessment into its decisions impacting the Company. In performing its oversight responsibilities, the Board receives an annual risk assessment report from the Chief Financial Officer and discusses the most significant risks facing the Company.

As part of this annual review, the Board reviews the Company’s cybersecurity risk profile and is informed on the specifics of the cybersecurity risk program in a separate annual presentation by the Company’s Chief Information Officer. This program provides the Board with an overview of the cybersecurity risks and threats landscape as well as reviews the Company’s risk posture. The Board is further briefed on actions and changes taken by management to mitigate the Company’s risk profile and provided with an overview of the cybersecurity strategy along with key cybersecurity initiatives and incidents.

The Board has delegated certain risk oversight functions to the Audit Committee. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee periodically reviews and discusses the Company’s business and financial risk management and risk assessment policies and procedures with senior management, the Company’s independent auditor, and the Chief Audit Executive. The Audit Committee incorporates its risk oversight function into its regular reports to the Board.

In response to the Data Security Incident, the Board has taken significant steps to enhance the processes and capabilities of the Board to oversee cybersecurity risk. In February 2019, the Board delegated to the Audit Committee responsibility for initial oversight of the Company’s information security and data privacy practices. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee undertook an extensive director search process to identify potential directors with specific cybersecurity experience. In March 2019, the Board elected Margaret M. McCarthy to the Board. Ms. McCarthy has over 30 years of experience in data security and technology with organizations including CVS Health Corporation, Aetna, Inc., and Catholic Health Initiatives.

In addition, the Compensation Policy Committee reviewed a risk assessment to determine whether the amount and components of compensation for the Company’s associates and the design of compensation programs might create incentives for excessive risk-taking by the Company’s associates. As explained in the CD&A below, the Compensation Policy Committee believes that our compensation programs encourage associates, including our executives, to remain focused on a balance of the short- and long-term operational and financial goals of the Company, and thereby reduces the potential for actions that involve an excessive level of risk.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders and others interested in communicating with the Lead Director, the Audit Committee, the non-employee directors, or any of the employee directors may do so by email to business.ethics@marriott.com or in writing to the Business Ethics Department, Department 52/924.09, 10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. All communications are forwarded to the appropriate directors for their review, except that the Board has instructed the Company not to forward solicitations, bulk mail or communications that do not address Company-related issues. The Company reports to the directors on the status of all outstanding concerns addressed to the non-employee directors, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. The non-employee directors, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the Audit Committee may direct special procedures, including the retention of outside advisors or counsel, for any concern addressed to them.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Guide

The Company has long maintained and enforced a Code of Ethics that applies to all Marriott associates, including our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and to each member of the Board. The Code of Ethics is encompassed in our Business Conduct Guide, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website (https://marriott.gcs-web.com) by clicking on “Governance” and then “Documents & Charters.” We will post on that website any future changes or amendments to our Code of Ethics, and any waiver of our Code of Ethics that applies to our Chairman of the Board, any of our executive officers, or a member of our Board within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver.

Audit Committee Report and Independent Auditor Fees

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements, the reporting process, and maintaining an effective system of internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent auditor is engaged to audit and express opinions on the conformity of the Company’s financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements together with the results of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting with management and the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditor those matters required to be discussed by the independent auditor with the Audit Committee under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures along with the annual PCAOB Rule 3526 communication of independence including direct discussion with the independent auditor in accordance with the requirements of the PCAOB.

Relying on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019.

Members of the Audit Committee:

Frederick A. Henderson (Chair)

Mary K. Bush

Bruce W. Duncan

Aylwin B. Lewis

George Muñoz

Margaret M. McCarthy joined the Audit Committee on March 19, 2019.

Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor Fees and Services Policy

The Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor Fees and Services Policy provides for pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, tax and other permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditor on an annual basis and additional services as needed. The policy also requires additional approval of any engagements that were previously approved but are anticipated to exceed pre-approved fee levels. The policy permits the Audit Committee Chair to pre-approve independent auditor services with estimated fees up to $100,000 (provided that the Audit Committee Chair reports to the full Audit Committee at the next meeting on any pre-approval determinations).

Audit Committee Report and Independent Auditor Fees

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Disclosure

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of our annual financial statements for 2018 and 2017 and fees billed for audit-related services, tax services and all other services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 and 2017. The Audit Committee approved all of the fees presented in the table below.

Executive and Director Compensation

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Report of the Compensation Policy Committee

Marriott is consistently recognized as a global hospitality leader. The Company believes that strong and consistent leadership is the key to long-term success in the hospitality industry. Each of the NEOs is a long-standing member of our senior management team, averaging over 24 years of hospitality experience with the Company. They have continued Marriott’s long history of delivering results for stockholders by working with talented, dedicated associates who uphold the Company’s ideals and unique culture. This culture is reflected in, and reinforced by, the design and implementation of the Company’s executive compensation program, which emphasizes the following principles:

The Compensation Policy Committee (the “Committee”), which is composed solely of independent members of the Board, assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to executive compensation. The Committee is responsible for overseeing compensation programs that enable the Company to attract, retain and motivate executives capable of establishing and implementing business plans in the best interests of the stockholders. The Committee, on behalf of and, in certain instances, subject to the approval of the Board, reviews and approves compensation programs for certain senior officer positions. In this context, the Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s CD&A required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K. Following the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be incorporated by reference in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and included in this proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation Policy Committee:

Steven S Reinemund (Chair)

Mary K. Bush

Eric Hippeau

Aylwin B. Lewis

Susan C. Schwab

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section discusses the Company’s executive compensation program for the following NEOs for 2018:

Executive and Director Compensation

Overview

Our executive compensation program continues to be designed to drive performance through a combination of near-term financial and operational objectives and long-term focus on our stock price performance. We believe that the consistency in how we manage our executive compensation program and our goals under that program has proven to be an important factor in the Company’s long-term success in the highly cyclical hospitality industry. Our philosophy continues to emphasize equity compensation as the most significant component of our NEOs’ total pay opportunity which supports our pay-for-performance objectives.

Compensation for 2018 reflects that financial and operational performance for the year was strong and exceeded guidance that we provided at the beginning of the year. Declines in the Company’s stock price across a year of global trade and economic tensions (i.e., stock market decline, China trade discussions, Brexit developments) are reflected in our NEOs’ realizable compensation. In addition, the Committee took into account the Data Security Incident when determining our CEO’s annual incentive compensation, although it believes that our NEOs engaged proactively and appropriately to respond to and help contain the impact of the event, and the Company does not expect the incident to affect the Company’s long-term financial health.

2018 Executive Compensation at a Glance

Executive and Director Compensation

2018 Compensation in Detail

Base Salary

For 2018, the Human Resources Department presented to the Committee market data on base salary levels at the 50^th percentile for each position and recommended base salary increases of approximately 3% for Mr. Capuano, Ms. Linnartz, Mr. Grissen and Ms. Oberg after it completed a comprehensive review of market data in 2018 as described below. These increases were consistent with salary increases for other management. Further, notwithstanding the Company’s continued success under Mr. Sorenson’s leadership, following its review of the external market data the Committee determined not to increase Mr. Sorenson’s base salary for 2018. The Company’s independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer (the “Compensation Consultant”), reviewed and supported the recommendations which were discussed in detail and approved by the Committee and, with respect to Mr. Sorenson, by the independent members of the Board.

Annual Incentives

To promote growth and profitability, the Company’s annual cash incentive program is based on actual performance measured against pre-established financial and business operational targets. The annual cash incentive design rewards executives for achieving annual corporate and individual performance objectives that support long-term financial and operational success.

The following graph illustrates how the aggregate annual incentives paid to the NEOs have changed relative to changes in the Company’s annual diluted earnings per share (“EPS”), over the past five years. EPS for 2016 and 2017 reflects $386 million and $159 million in merger-related costs attributable to the Starwood combination, respectively.

NEOs’ Aggregate Annual Incentive Value vs. Diluted EPS

Executive and Director Compensation

At its February 2018 meeting, the Committee approved specific performance objectives and targets under the annual cash incentive program for 2018. In February 2019, upon review of the 2018 fiscal year’s strategic integration achievements and financial and operational results and taking into account the Company’s performance relative to lodging and other comparator companies, the Committee reviewed each NEO’s performance against the pre-established performance objectives to determine the actual cash incentive payments, as discussed below. All the Committee’s decisions regarding annual cash incentives for Mr. Sorenson, including adjustments to certain elements of his annual incentive compensation as discussed above, were subject to and received Board approval.

As reflected in the following table, target awards under the annual cash incentive program were 150% of salary for Mr. Sorenson and 75% for the other NEOs. The Committee reviewed market data for each position and determined that the incentive amounts payable upon achievement of target performance levels would result in total cash compensation (base salary plus annual incentive) that would be at or near the 50^th percentile.

The annual cash incentive program performance factors are intended to establish high standards consistent with the Company’s quality goals, which are designed to be achievable but not certain to be met. The Company believes that these factors are critical to achieving success within the hospitality and service industry. The weighting of performance factors varies among the NEOs by position due to differences in responsibility. The table below displays the respective weightings of the relevant performance measures and the aggregate actual payout as a percent of target for 2018 under the annual cash incentive program.