UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended September 30, 2014

Commission file number 1-31763

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1700

Dallas, Texas 75240-2697

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 233-1700

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding on October 31, 2014: 115,872,598.

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

 

 

 

 

- 2 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions)

 

 

 

- 3 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 8 and 12)

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

- 4 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

- 5 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 6 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

- 7 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 8 -

---

 

 

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(In millions)

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

- 9 -

---

 

KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2014

(unaudited)

 

Note 1 - Organization and basis of presentation:

Organization - At September 30, 2014, (i) Valhi, Inc. (NYSE: VHI) held approximately 50% of our outstanding common stock (ii) NL Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NL) held approximately 30% of our common stock, (iii) Valhi owned approximately 83% of NL’s outstanding common stock and (iv) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Contran Corporation held approximately 94% of Valhi’s outstanding common stock.  Substantially all of Contran’s outstanding voting stock is held by family trusts established for the benefit of Lisa K. Simmons and Serena Simmons Connelly, daughters of Harold C. Simmons, and their children (for which Ms. Lisa Simmons and Ms. Connelly are co-trustees) or is held directly by Ms. Lisa Simmons and Ms. Connelly or persons or entities related to them, including their step-mother Annette C. Simmons, the widow of Mr. Simmons. Prior to his death in December 2013, Mr. Simmons served as sole trustee of the family trusts.  Under a voting agreement entered into by all of the voting stockholders of Contran, effective in February 2014 and as amended, the size of the board of directors of Contran was fixed at five members, Ms. Lisa Simmons, Ms. Connelly and Ms. Annette Simmons (and in the event of their death, their heirs) each has the right to designate one of the five members of the Contran board and the remaining two members of the Contran board must consist of members of Contran management. Ms. Lisa Simmons, Ms. Connelly, and Ms. Annette Simmons each serve as members of the Contran board.  The voting agreement expires in February 2017 (unless Ms. Lisa Simmons, Ms. Connelly and Ms. Annette Simmons otherwise unanimously agree), and the ability of Ms. Lisa Simmons, Ms. Connelly, and Ms. Annette Simmons to each designate one member of the Contran board is dependent upon each of their continued beneficial ownership of at least 5% of the combined voting stock of Contran.  Consequently, Ms. Lisa Simmons, Ms. Connelly and Ms. Annette Simmons may be deemed to control Contran, Valhi, NL and us.

Basis of presentation - The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report have been prepared on the same basis as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 12, 2014 (2013 Annual Report).  In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) in order to state fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented.  We have condensed the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Stockholders’ Equity at December 31, 2013 contained in this Quarterly Report as compared to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements at that date, and we have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures (including those related to the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013) normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).  Our results of operations for the interim periods ended September 30, 2014 may not be indicative of our operating results for the full year.  The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report should be read in conjunction with our 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 2013 Annual Report.

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this report to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Kronos Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiaries (NYSE: KRO) taken as a whole.

 

Note 2 - Accounts and other receivables:

 

 

- 10 -

---

 

Note 3 - Inventories, net:

 

 

Note 4 - Marketable securities:

Our marketable securities consist of investments in the publicly-traded shares of related parties: Valhi, NL and CompX International Inc. NL owns a majority of CompX’s outstanding common stock.  All of our marketable securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities, which are carried at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets for each marketable security, and represent a Level 1 input within the fair value hierarchy.  See Note 13.  Because we have classified all of our marketable securities as available-for-sale, any unrealized gains or losses on the securities are recognized through other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes.

 

 

At December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, we held approximately 1.7 million shares of Valhi’s common stock which we purchased during 2010 and 2011.  We also held a nominal number of shares of CompX and NL common stocks.  At December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, the quoted per share market price of Valhi’s common stock was $17.58 and $6.53, respectively.

The Valhi, CompX and NL common stocks we own are subject to the restrictions on resale pursuant to certain provisions of SEC Rule 144.  In addition, as a majority-owned subsidiary of Valhi we cannot vote our shares of Valhi common stock under Delaware Corporation Law, but we do receive dividends from Valhi on these shares, when declared and paid.

With respect to our investment in Valhi stock, our cost basis has exceeded its market value since March 2014, but we consider such decline in market price to be temporary at September 30, 2014.  We considered all available evidence in reaching this conclusion, including our ability and intent to hold this investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of fair value, as evidenced by the amount of liquidity we currently have with cash on hand.  We will continue to monitor the quoted market price for this investment.  In this regard, as of October 31, 2014, the aggregate quoted market price for our shares of Valhi common stock was $5.1 million less than our aggregate cost basis.  If we conclude in the future that a decline in value of one or more of these securities was other than temporary, we would recognize impairment through an income statement charge at that time.  Such income statement impairment charge would be offset in other comprehensive income by the reversal of the previously recognized unrealized losses to the extent they were previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.

- 11 -

---

 

 

Note 5 - Other noncurrent assets:

 

 

Note 6 - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:

 

 

Note 7 - Long-term debt:

 

 

 

Term loan - In February 2014, we entered into a new $350 million term loan. The term loan was issued at 99.5% of the principal amount, or an aggregate of $348.25 million.  We used $170 million of the net proceeds of the new term loan to prepay the outstanding principal balance of our note payable to Contran (along with accrued and unpaid interest through the prepayment date), and such note payable was cancelled. The remaining net proceeds of the term loan are available for our general corporate purposes. The new term loan:

- 12 -

---

 

The average interest rate on the term loan borrowings as of and for the period from issuance to September 30, 2014 was 4.75%. The carrying value of the term loan at September 30, 2014 includes unamortized original issue discount of $1.6 million.

In 2013, we voluntarily repaid our entire $400 million term loan that was issued in June 2012. We prepaid an aggregate $290 million principal amount in February 2013 and we recognized a non-cash pre-tax interest charge of $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2013 related to this prepayment consisting of the write-off of unamortized original issue discount costs and deferred financing costs associated with such prepayment. Funds for such $290 million prepayment were provided by $100 million of our cash on hand as well as borrowings of $190 million under a 2013 loan agreement from Contran as described below. In July 2013, we voluntarily prepaid the remaining $100 million principal amount outstanding under such term loan.

Note payable to Contran - As discussed above, in February 2013 we entered into a promissory note with Contran. This loan from Contran contained terms and conditions similar to the terms and conditions of our prior $400 million term loan, except that the loan from Contran was unsecured and contained no ongoing financial maintenance covenant. The independent members of our board of directors approved the terms and conditions of the loan from Contran. As discussed above, in February 2014 we used $170 million of the proceeds from our new term loan and prepaid the remaining balance owed to Contran under this note payable (without penalty), and the note payable to Contran was cancelled.  The average interest rate on these borrowings for the year-to-date period ended February 18, 2014 (the payoff date) was 7.375%.

European revolving credit facility - During the first nine months of 2014, we had no borrowings or repayments under our European revolving credit facility. There were no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2014.  Our European revolving credit facility requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, and one of such requirements is based on the ratio of net debt to last twelve months earnings before income tax, interest, depreciation and amortization expense (EBITDA) of the borrowers. At September 30, 2013, and based on the net debt to EBITDA of the borrowers, we would not have met this financial covenant test if the borrowers had any net debt outstanding. In December 2013, the lenders under our European revolving credit facility granted a waiver through June 30, 2014 with respect to the net debt to EBITDA financial test, but our ability to borrow any amounts under the facility was subject to the requirement that the borrowers maintain a specified minimum level of EBITDA. We met the specified minimum level of EBITDA during the waiver period that ended June 30, 2014. Based upon the borrowers’ last twelve months EBITDA as of September 30, 2014 and the net debt to EBITDA financial test, our borrowing availability at September 30, 2014 is approximately 53% of the credit facility, or €64 million ($81 million).

Revolving North American credit facility - During the first nine months of 2014, we borrowed $81.0 million and repaid $92.1 million under our North American revolving credit facility. The average interest rate on outstanding borrowings for the year-to-date period ended February 18, 2014 when the outstanding balance was repaid was 3.75%. At September 30, 2014 we had approximately $97 million available for borrowing under this revolving facility.

Canada - At September 30, 2014, an aggregate of Cdn. $.3 million letters of credit were outstanding under our Canadian subsidiary’s loan agreement with the Bank of Montreal which exists solely for the issuance of up to Cdn. $10.0 million in letters of credit.  During the second quarter of 2014, letters of credit aggregating Cdn. $7.6 million, issued in connection with the appeal of a Canadian income tax assessment, were cancelled (see Note 8) and an equivalent amount of restricted cash deposits at the Bank of Montreal collateralizing such letters of credit, classified as noncurrent restricted cash, were released (see Note 5).

- 13 -

---

 

In September 2014, we borrowed an additional Cdn. $1.2 million under our Canadian subsidiary’s agreement with an economic development agency of the Province of Quebec, Canada.  At September 30, 2014, an aggregate Cdn. $3.0 million (USD $2.7 million) was outstanding under this agreement.  Borrowings under this agreement are non-interest bearing.

Restrictions and other - Our European credit facility described above requires the borrower to maintain minimum levels of equity, requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, limits dividends and additional indebtedness and contains other provisions and restrictive covenants customary in lending transactions of this type. Our term loan and North American revolving credit facility also contain restrictive covenants. At September 30, 2014, there were no restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants at September 30, 2014.

Note 8 - Income taxes:

 

 

 

 

Tax authorities are examining certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. tax returns and have or may propose tax deficiencies, including penalties and interest.  Because of the inherent uncertainties involved in settlement initiatives and court and tax proceedings, we cannot guarantee that these matters will be resolved in our favor, and therefore our potential exposure, if any, is also uncertain.  We believe we have adequate accruals for additional taxes and related interest expense which could ultimately result from tax examinations.  We believe the ultimate disposition of tax examinations should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.  We currently estimate that our unrecognized tax benefits will not change materially during the next twelve months.

 

In 2011 and 2012, we received notices of re-assessment from the Canadian federal and provincial tax authorities related to the years 2002 through 2004.  We objected to the re-assessments and believed the position was without merit.  Accordingly, we appealed the re-assessments and in connection with such appeal we were required to post letters of credit aggregating Cdn. $7.9 million (see Note 7).  In the second quarter of 2014, the Appeals Division of the Canadian Revenue Authority ruled in our favor and reversed in their entirety such notices of re-assessment.  As a result, we recognized a non-cash income tax benefit of $3.0 million related to the release of a portion of our reserve for uncertain tax positions in the second quarter of 2014 related to the completion of this Canadian

- 14 -

---

 

income tax audit.  In addition, related letters of credit aggregating Cdn. $7.6 million have been cancelled (see Note 7), and we anticipate the remaining Cdn. $.3 million will be cancelled by year end.  Also during the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a non-cash income tax benefit of $3.1 million related to the release of a portion of our reserve for uncertain tax positions in conjunction with the completion of an audit of our U.S. income tax return for 2009.

 

Our provision for income taxes in the third quarter of 2014 includes a $2 million cash tax benefit associated with certain U.S. income tax credits, which we elected to claim on our 2012 amended tax return filed in the third quarter of 2014.

 

Note 9 - Employee benefit plans:

Defined benefit plans - The components of net periodic defined benefit pension cost are presented in the table below.

 

 

Postretirement benefits - The components of net periodic postretirement benefits other than pension (OPEB) cost are presented in the table below.

 

 

Contributions - We expect our 2014 contributions for our pension and other postretirement plans to be approximately $24 million.

 

Note 10 - Other noncurrent liabilities:

 

 

- 15 -

---

 

Note 11 - Accumulated other comprehensive loss:

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 are presented in the table below.

 

 

See Note 9 for amounts related to our defined benefit pension plans and OPEB plans.

 

Note 12 - Commitments and contingencies:

From time-to-time, we are involved in various environmental, contractual, product liability, patent (or intellectual property), employment and other claims and disputes incidental to our operations. In certain cases, we have insurance coverage for these items. We currently believe the disposition of all claims and disputes, individually or in the aggregate, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity beyond the accruals we have already provided.

Please refer to our 2013 Annual Report for a discussion of certain other legal proceedings to which we are a party.

- 16 -

---

 

 

Note 13 - Financial instruments:

The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments recorded on a fair value basis as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014:

 

 

Certain of our sales generated by our non-U.S. operations are denominated in U.S. dollars. We periodically use currency forward contracts to manage a very nominal portion of currency exchange rate risk associated with trade receivables denominated in a currency other than the holder’s functional currency or similar exchange rate risk associated with future sales. We have not entered into these contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the past, nor do we currently anticipate entering into such contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the future. Derivatives used to hedge forecasted transactions and specific cash flows associated with financial assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and which meet the criteria for hedge accounting are designated as cash flow hedges. Consequently, the effective portion of gains and losses is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. Contracts that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting are marked-to-market at each balance sheet date with any resulting gain or loss recognized in income currently as part of net currency transactions. The fair value of the currency forward contracts is determined using Level 1 inputs based on the currency spot forward rates quoted by banks or currency dealers.

At September 30, 2014, we had currency forward contracts to exchange:

The estimated fair value of our currency forward contracts at September 30, 2014 was a $.6 million net asset, of which $1.1 million is recognized as part of accounts and other receivables and $.5 million is recognized as part of accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. There is also a corresponding net $.6 million currency transaction gain recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We are not currently using hedge accounting for our outstanding currency forward contracts at September 30, 2014, and we did not use hedge accounting for any of such contracts we previously held in 2013.

 

- 17 -

---

 

The following table presents the financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014.

 

At September 30, 2014, the estimated market price of our term loan was $987.50 per $1,000 principal amount. The fair value of our term loan is based on quoted market prices; however, these quoted market prices represent Level 2 inputs because the markets in which the term loan trades were not active. The fair values of our note payable to Contran and our European credit facility represent Level 2 inputs, and are deemed to approximate book value. The fair value of our common stockholders’ equity is based upon quoted market prices at each balance sheet date, which represent Level 1 inputs. Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered equivalent to fair value.

Note 14 - Recent accounting pronouncements:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  This standard replaces existing revenue recognition guidance, which in many cases was tailored for specific industries, with a uniform accounting standard applicable to all industries and transactions.  The new standard is effective for us beginning with the first quarter of 2017.  Entities may elect to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 retrospectively for all periods for all contracts and transactions which occurred during the period (with a few exceptions for practical expediency) or retrospectively with a cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption.  ASU No. 2014-09 is a fundamental rewriting of existing GAAP with respect to revenue recognition, and we are still evaluating the effect the Standard will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.  In addition, we have not yet determined the method we will use to adopt the Standard.

 

 

 

- 18 -

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

Business overview

We are a leading global producer and marketer of value-added titanium dioxide pigments (TiO₂). TiO₂ is used for a variety of manufacturing applications, including coatings, plastics, paper and other industrial and specialty products. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, approximately one-half of our sales volumes were into European markets. Our production facilities are located in Europe and North America.

We consider TiO₂ to be a “quality of life” product, with demand affected by gross domestic product, or GDP, and overall economic conditions in our markets located in various regions of the world. Over the long-term, we expect demand for TiO₂ will grow by 2% to 3% per year, consistent with our expectations for the long-term growth in GDP. However, even if we and our competitors maintain consistent shares of the worldwide market, demand for TiO₂ in any interim or annual period may not change in the same proportion as the change in GDP, in part due to relative changes in the TiO₂ inventory levels of our customers. We believe that our customers’ inventory levels are influenced in part by their expectations for future changes in TiO₂ market selling prices as well as their expectations for future availability of product. Although certain of our TiO₂ grades are considered specialty pigments, the majority of our grades and substantially all of our production are considered commodity pigment products, with price and availability being the most significant competitive factors along with quality and customer service.

The factors having the most impact on our reported operating results are:

Our key performance indicators are our TiO₂ average selling prices, our level of TiO₂ sales and production volumes and the cost of our third-party feedstock ore. TiO₂ selling prices generally follow industry trends and prices will increase or decrease generally as a result of competitive market pressures.

Executive summary

We reported net income of $31.9 million, or $.28 per share, in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to a net loss of $29.9 million, or $.26 per share, in the third quarter of 2013. For the first nine months of 2014, we reported net income of $79.3 million, or $.68 per share, compared to a net loss of $104.9 million, or $.91 per share, in the first nine months of 2013.  We reported net income in the third quarter of 2014 compared to a loss in the third quarter of 2013 principally due to improved results from operations resulting primarily from lower raw material costs and higher production and sales volumes, partially offset by lower average selling prices as well as a third quarter 2013 litigation settlement charge.  We reported net income in the first nine months of 2014 compared to a loss in the first nine months of 2013 principally due to improved results from operations resulting primarily from lower raw material costs and higher production volumes, partially offset by lower average selling prices and lower sales volumes in 2014 as well as the third quarter 2013 litigation settlement charge.

Our results in the first nine months of 2014 include a second quarter aggregate non-cash income tax benefit of $5.7 million ($.05 per share) related to a net reduction in our reserve for uncertain tax positions.  Our results in the first nine months of 2013 include a first quarter non-cash pre-tax charge of $6.6 million ($4.3 million, or $.04 per share, net of income tax benefit) and a third quarter charge of $2.3 million ($1.5 million, or $.01 per share, net of income tax benefit) related to the voluntary prepayment of $290 million and $100 million principal amount, respectively, of our term loan, consisting of the write-off of original issue discount costs and deferred financing costs associated with such prepayments.  Our results in the third quarter of 2013 also include a pre-tax litigation settlement expense of $35 million ($22.5 million, or $.19 per share, net of income tax benefit).

Forward-looking information

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking in nature and represent management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. Statements in this report including, but not limited to, statements found in Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are

- 19 -

---

 

forward-looking statements that represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “anticipates,” “expects” or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategies or trends. Although we believe the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know if these expectations will be correct. Such statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. Actual future results could differ materially from those predicted. The factors that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those described herein are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Quarterly Report and those described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC including, but are not limited to, the following:

Should one or more of these risks materialize (or the consequences of such a development worsen), or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those forecasted or expected. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of changes in information, future events or otherwise.

- 20 -

---

 

Results of operations

Current industry conditions

As previously discussed, after about a year of decreasing selling prices within the TiO₂ industry, our TiO₂ selling prices were generally stable during the second half of 2013.  Our average selling prices at the end of the third quarter of 2014 were 7% lower than at the end of 2013, with most of the decline occurring in the first half of the year, and with lower prices in all major markets, most notably in certain export markets.  We experienced significantly lower sales to our generally lower-margin export markets in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period of 2013, however we experienced higher sales in most major markets, including the export markets, in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013.  Demand for TiO₂ products has generally been stable in 2014 in most European and North American markets.

We operated our production facilities at reduced capacity rates in 2013 (approximately 92%, 90%, 82% and 81% of practical capacity in the first through fourth quarter periods, respectively).  While our production capacity utilization rates in the second half of 2013 were impacted by the union labor lockout at our Canadian production facility that ended in December 2013, our utilization rates were also impacted by such lockout in the first quarter of 2014, as restart of production at the facility did not begin until February 2014.  We operated our production facilities at overall average capacity utilization rates of 96% in the third quarter of 2014, compared to 90% in the first quarter and 97% in the second quarter of 2014.

Our cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in 2013 (particularly in the first quarter) was significantly higher than TiO₂ sold in the first nine months of 2014, as a substantial portion of the TiO₂ products we sold in the first quarter (and to a lesser-extent the second quarter) of 2013 was produced with the higher-cost feedstock ore procured in 2012.  We have seen moderation in the cost of TiO₂ feedstock ore procured from third parties in 2013 and continuing into 2014, but such reductions did not begin to be significantly reflected in our cost of sales until the third quarter of 2013.

Quarter ended September 30, 2014 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2013

 

 

Net sales - Net sales in the third quarter of 2014 decreased 1%, or $4.3 million, compared to the third quarter of 2013 primarily due to the net effects of a 6% decrease in average TiO₂ selling prices (which decreased net sales by approximately $25 million) and a 4% increase in sales volumes (which increased net sales by approximately $17 million). TiO₂ selling prices will increase or decrease generally as a result of competitive market pressures, changes in the relative level of supply and demand as well as changes in raw material and other manufacturing costs.

Our sales volumes increased 4% in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the third quarter of 2013 due to higher sales primarily in certain export and U.S. markets. We estimate that changes in currency exchange rates increased our net sales by approximately $3 million as compared to the third quarter of 2013.

- 21 -

---

 

Cost of sales - Cost of sales decreased $52.8 million or 14% in the third quarter of 2014 compared to 2013 due to the net impact of lower raw materials and other production costs of approximately $50 million (primarily caused by the lower third-party feedstock ore costs, as discussed above), a 4% increase in sales volumes, an 18% increase in TiO₂ production volumes and currency fluctuations (primarily the euro). In addition, in the third quarter of 2013 we recognized approximately $7 million in unabsorbed fixed production costs related to a union labor lockout at our Canadian production facility.  Our cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased to 77% in the third quarter of 2014 compared to 89% in the same period of 2013, primarily due to lower raw material costs and lower unabsorbed fixed costs as discussed above.

Other operating expense, net - Other operating expense in the third quarter of 2013 includes a $35 million litigation settlement charge.

Gross margin and income (loss) from operations - Income from operations increased by $84.9 million from a loss of $37.0 million in the third quarter of 2013 to income of $47.9 million in the third quarter of 2014. Income (loss) from operations as a percentage of net sales increased to 12% in the third quarter of 2014 from (9)% in the same period of 2013.  This increase was driven by the increase in gross margin, which increased to 23% for the third quarter of 2014 compared to 11% for the third quarter of 2013 and by the third quarter 2013 litigation settlement charge as discussed above. As discussed and quantified above, our gross margin increased primarily due to the net effect of lower manufacturing costs (primarily raw materials), higher production volumes, higher sales volumes and lower selling prices.  Additionally, changes in currency exchange rates have positively affected our gross margin and income from operations.  We estimate that changes in currency exchange rates increased income from operations by approximately $8 million in the third quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013.

Other non-operating income (expense) - We recognized an aggregate $2.3 million pre-tax charge, consisting of the write-off of unamortized original issue discount costs and deferred financing costs, in the third quarter of 2013 related to the voluntary prepayment of the remaining $100 million principal amount of our prior term loan.  See Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest expense decreased $.6 million from $4.5 million in the third quarter of 2013 to $3.9 million in the third quarter of 2014 primarily due to lower average interest rates on our outstanding borrowings in the third quarter of 2014, partially offset by slightly higher average debt levels. We currently expect our interest expense for all of 2014 will be lower than 2013, as the favorable impact of lower average interest rates on outstanding borrowings will offset the impact of higher overall average debt levels resulting from the new term loan we issued in February 2014.

Income tax expense (benefit) - We recognized income tax expense of $12.3 million in the third quarter of 2014 compared to a benefit of $13.6 million in the same period last year.  This difference is primarily due to our increased earnings.  See Note 8 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a tabular reconciliation of our statutory income tax provision to our actual tax provision.

We have substantial net operating loss carryforwards in Germany (the equivalent of $842 million and $127 million for German corporate and trade tax purposes, respectively, at December 31, 2013) and in Belgium (the equivalent of $102 million for Belgian corporate tax purposes at December 31, 2013).  At September 30, 2014, we have concluded that no deferred income tax asset valuation allowance is required to be recognized with respect to such carryforwards, principally because (i) such carryforwards have an indefinite carryforward period, (ii) we have utilized a portion of such German carryforwards during the most recent three-year period and (iii) we currently expect to utilize the remainder of such carryforwards over the long term.  However, prior to the complete utilization of such carryforwards, particularly if we were to generate losses in our German and Belgian operations for an extended period of time, it is possible that we might conclude the benefit of such carryforwards would no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria, at which point we would be required to recognize a valuation allowance against some or all of the then-remaining tax benefit associated with the carryforwards.

- 22 -

---

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013

 

 

Net sales - Net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased 6%, or $85.4 million, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily due to the effects of a 4% decrease in sales volumes (which decreased net sales by approximately $55 million) and a 5% decrease in average TiO₂ selling prices (which decreased net sales by approximately $68 million). TiO₂ selling prices will increase or decrease generally as a result of competitive market pressures, changes in the relative level of supply and demand as well as changes in raw material and other manufacturing costs.

Our sales volumes decreased 4% in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the first nine months of 2013 primarily due to lower sales in certain export markets. We estimate that changes in currency exchange rates increased our net sales by approximately $23 million as compared to the first nine months of 2013.

Cost of sales - Cost of sales decreased $294.7 million or 23% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to the net impact of lower raw materials and other production costs of approximately $235 million (primarily caused by lower third-party feedstock ore costs), an 8% increase in TiO₂ production volumes, a 4% decrease in sales volumes and currency fluctuations (primarily the euro).  Our cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased to 79% in the first nine months of 2014 compared to 96% in the same period of 2013, primarily due to lower raw material costs and the approximately $7 million in unabsorbed fixed production costs related to the union labor lockout at our Canadian production facility, as discussed above.

Other operating expense, net - Other operating expense in the first nine months of 2013 includes a third quarter litigation settlement charge of $35 million.

Gross margin and income (loss) from operations - Income from operations increased by $249.8 million from a loss of $131.6 million in the first nine months of 2013 to income of $118.2 million in the first nine months of 2014. Income (loss) from operations as a percentage of net sales increased to 9% in the first nine months of 2014 from (10)% in the same period of 2013.  This increase was driven by the increase in gross margin, which increased to 21% for the first nine months of 2014 compared to 4% for the first nine months of 2013 and by the 2013 litigation settlement charge as discussed above.  As discussed and quantified above, our gross margin increased primarily due to the net effect of lower manufacturing costs (primarily raw materials), higher production volumes, lower selling prices and lower sales volumes.  Additionally, changes in currency exchange rates have positively affected our gross margin and income from operations.  We estimate that changes in currency exchange rates increased income from operations by approximately $28 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013.

Other non-operating expense - We recognized an aggregate $8.9 million pre-tax charge, consisting of the write-off of unamortized original issue discount costs and deferred financing costs, in the first and third quarters of 2013 related to the voluntary prepayment of our prior term loan by $290 million in the first quarter of 2013 and the remaining $100 million in the third quarter of 2013. See Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 23 -

---

 

Interest expense decreased $4.0 million from $16.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $12.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 primarily due to lower average interest rates on outstanding borrowings in the first nine months of 2014 partially offset by slightly higher average debt levels.

Income tax expense (benefit) - We recognized income tax expense of $27.0 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared to an income tax benefit of $51.3 million in the same period last year.  This difference is primarily due to our increased earnings.  In addition, our income tax expense in the first nine months of 2014 was favorably impacted by an aggregate non-cash income tax benefit of $5.1 million related to a net reduction in our reserve for uncertain tax positions.  See Note 8 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a tabular reconciliation of our statutory income tax provision to our actual tax provision.

Effects of Currency Exchange Rates

We have substantial operations and assets located outside the United States (primarily in Germany, Belgium, Norway and Canada). The majority of our sales from non-U.S. operations are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the euro, other major European currencies and the Canadian dollar. A portion of our sales generated from our non-U.S. operations is denominated in the U.S. dollar. Certain raw materials used worldwide, primarily titanium-containing feedstocks, are purchased in U.S. dollars, while labor and other production costs are purchased primarily in local currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar value of our non-U.S. sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or unfavorably impact reported earnings and may affect the comparability of period-to-period operating results. In addition to the impact of the translation of sales and expenses over time, our non-U.S. operations also generate currency transaction gains and losses which primarily relate to the difference between the currency exchange rates in effect when non-local currency sales or operating costs are initially accrued and when such amounts are settled with the non-local currency.

Overall, we estimate that fluctuations in currency exchange rates had the following effects on our sales and income from operations for the periods indicated.

 

 

- 24 -

---

 

Outlook

 

During the first nine months of 2014 we operated our production facilities at 94% of practical capacity.  This reflects an increased plant utilization rate as compared to the same period of 2013.  While our production capacity utilization rates in the second half of 2013 were impacted by the lockout at our Canadian production facility that ended in December 2013, our utilization rates continued to be impacted by such lockout in the first quarter of 2014, as restart of production at the facility did not begin until February 2014.  While we expect our production volumes to be higher in 2014 as compared to 2013, we expect to continue to operate below full production capacity in 2014.  The less-than-full production utilization is principally due to the ramp-up of operations at our Canadian facility following the end of the lockout as well as the implementation of certain productivity-enhancing capital improvement projects at other facilities which will result in longer-than-normal maintenance shutdowns in certain instances.  We will continue to monitor current and anticipated near-term customer demand levels and align our production and inventories accordingly.

 

We experienced moderation in the cost of TiO₂ feedstock ore procured in 2013 and continuing into 2014, and consequently our cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the first nine months of 2014 was significantly lower than our cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the first nine months of 2013.  Given the time lag between when we procure third-party feedstock ore and when the TiO₂ product produced with such third-party feedstock is sold and recognized in our cost of sales, we expect our cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in calendar 2014 will be lower than the cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in calendar 2013, and our cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the fourth quarter of 2014 will be lower than the cost of sales per metric ton of TiO₂ sold in the first nine months of 2014.  Although the cost of feedstock ore has and continues to moderate, as discussed below our average TiO₂ selling prices have declined during 2014.  We started 2014 with selling prices 6% lower than the beginning of 2013, and prices declined by an additional 7% in the first nine months of 2014.  Industry data indicates that overall TiO₂ inventory held by producers has been significantly decreased.  In addition, we believe most customers hold very low inventories of TiO₂ with many operating on a just-in-time basis.  As a result, lead times for delivery are increasing.  With the strong sales volumes experienced in 2013 and in certain established markets during the first nine months of 2014, we continue to see evidence of improvement in demand for our TiO₂ products in certain of our primary markets.  The extent to which we will be able to achieve any price increases in the near term will depend on market conditions.  

 

Overall, we expect that income from operations in 2014 will be higher as compared to 2013, as a result of:

Due to the constraints of high capital costs and extended lead time associated with adding significant new TiO₂ production capacity, especially for premium grades of TiO₂ products produced from the chloride process, we believe increased and sustained profit margins will be necessary to financially justify major expansions of TiO₂ production capacity required to meet expected future growth in demand.  As a result of customer decisions over the last year and the resulting adverse effect on global TiO₂ pricing, some industry projects to increase TiO₂ production capacity have been cancelled or deferred indefinitely. Given the lead time required for such production capacity expansions, a shortage of TiO₂ products could occur if economic conditions improve and global demand levels for TiO₂ increase sufficiently.

 

Our expectations for our future operating results are based upon a number of factors beyond our control, including worldwide growth of GDP, competition in the marketplace, continued operation of competitors, unexpected or earlier-than-expected capacity additions or reductions and technological advances.  If actual developments differ from our expectations, our results of operations could be unfavorably affected.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Consolidated cash flows

Operating activities

Trends in cash flows as a result of our operating activities (excluding the impact of significant asset dispositions and relative changes in assets and liabilities) are generally similar to trends in our earnings.

Cash provided by operating activities was $26.5 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared to $60.8 million in the first nine months of 2013. This $34.3 million decrease in the amount of cash provided was primarily due to the net effects of the following:

- 25 -

---

 

Changes in working capital were affected by accounts receivable and inventory changes. As shown below:

For comparative purposes, we have also provided comparable prior year numbers below.

 

Investing activities

Our capital expenditures of $49.9 million and $39.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively, were primarily to maintain and improve the cost effectiveness of our existing manufacturing facilities.  In addition, we had a net reduction in restricted cash of $7.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, principally related to the release of certain restricted cash deposits upon the cancellation of certain letters of credit issued in connection with the appeal of a Canadian income tax assessment which was completed in our favor.  See Notes 7 and 8 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financing activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we:

Outstanding debt obligations

At September 30, 2014, our consolidated debt comprised:

Our North American and European revolvers and our new term loan contain a number of covenants and restrictions which, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional debt, incur liens, pay dividends or merge or consolidate with, or sell or transfer substantially all of our assets to, another entity, and contains other provisions and restrictive covenants customary in lending transactions of this type.  Certain of our credit agreements contain provisions which could result in the acceleration of indebtedness prior to their stated maturity for reasons other than defaults for failure to comply with typical financial or payment covenants.  For example, certain credit agreements allow the lender to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness upon a change of control (as defined in the agreement) of the borrower.  In addition, certain credit agreements could result in the acceleration of all or a portion of the

- 26 -

---

 

indebtedness following a sale of assets outside the ordinary course of business.  Our European revolving credit facility also requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, and one of such requirements is based on the ratio of net debt to the last twelve months EBITDA of the borrowers.  In December 2013, the lenders under our European revolving credit facility granted a waiver through June 30, 2014 with respect to the financial test, but our ability to borrow any amounts under the facility was subject to the requirement that the borrowers maintain a specified level of EBITDA.  We met the specified minimum level of EBITDA during the waiver period that ended June 30, 2014.  We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants at September 30, 2014.  We believe that we will be able to continue to comply with the financial covenants contained in our credit facilities through their maturity; however if future operating results differ materially from our expectations we may be unable to maintain compliance.  We believe we have alternate sources of liquidity, including cash on hand and borrowings under our North American revolver, in order to adequately address any compliance issues which might arise.  Neither our new term loan nor our North American revolving credit facility contains a financial maintenance covenant.

Our assets consist primarily of investments in operating subsidiaries, and our ability to service parent-level obligations, including our term loan, depends in part upon the distribution of earnings of our subsidiaries, whether in the form of dividends, advances or payments on account of intercompany obligations or otherwise.  The term loan is collateralized by, among other things, a first priority lien on (i) 100% of the common stock of certain of our U.S. wholly-owned subsidiaries, (ii) 65% of the common stock or other ownership interest of our Canadian subsidiary (Kronos Canada, Inc.) and certain first-tier European subsidiaries (Kronos Titan GmbH and Kronos Denmark ApS) and (iii) a $395.7 million unsecured promissory note issued by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Kronos International, Inc. (KII).  The term loan is also collateralized by a second priority lien on our U.S. assets which collateralize our North American revolving credit facility.  Our North American revolving credit facility is collateralized by, among other things, a first priority lien on the borrower’s trade receivables and inventories.  Our European revolving credit facility is collateralized by, among other things, the accounts receivable and inventories of the borrowers plus a limited pledge of all the other assets of the Belgian borrower.

See Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Future cash requirements

Liquidity

Our primary source of liquidity on an ongoing basis is cash flows from operating activities which is generally used to (i) fund working capital expenditures, (ii) repay any short-term indebtedness incurred for working capital purposes and (iii) provide for the payment of dividends. From time-to-time we will incur indebtedness, generally to (i) fund short-term working capital needs, (ii) refinance existing indebtedness or (iii) fund major capital expenditures or the acquisition of other assets outside the ordinary course of business. We will also from time-to-time sell assets outside the ordinary course of business and use the proceeds to (i) repay existing indebtedness, (ii) make investments in marketable and other securities, (iii) fund major capital expenditures or the acquisition of other assets outside the ordinary course of business or (iv) pay dividends.

The TiO₂ industry is cyclical, and changes in industry economic conditions significantly impact earnings and operating cash flows. Changes in TiO₂ pricing, production volumes and customer demand, among other things, could significantly affect our liquidity.

We routinely evaluate our liquidity requirements, alternative uses of capital, capital needs and availability of resources in view of, among other things, our dividend policy, our debt service and capital expenditure requirements and estimated future operating cash flows. As a result of this process, we have in the past and may in the future seek to reduce, refinance, repurchase or restructure indebtedness, raise additional capital, repurchase shares of our common stock, modify our dividend policy, restructure ownership interests, sell interests in our subsidiaries or other assets, or take a combination of these steps or other steps to manage our liquidity and capital resources. Such activities have in the past and may in the future involve related companies. In the normal course of our business, we may investigate, evaluate, discuss and engage in acquisition, joint venture, strategic relationship and other business combination opportunities in the TiO₂ industry. In the event of any future acquisition or joint venture opportunity, we may consider using then-available liquidity, issuing our equity securities or incurring additional indebtedness.

At September 30, 2014, we had aggregate cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on hand of $153.5 million, of which $71.1 million was held by non-U.S. subsidiaries.  At September 30, 2014, we had approximately $97 million available for borrowing under our North American revolving credit facility.  Based on the terms of our European credit facility (including the net debt to EBITDA financial test discussed above), and the borrowers’ EBITDA over the last twelve months ending September 30, 2014, our borrowing availability at September 30, 2014 under this facility is approximately 53% of the credit facility, or €64 million ($81 million).  We could borrow all available amounts under each of our credit facilities without violating our existing debt covenants.  Based upon our expectation for the TiO₂ industry and anticipated demands on cash resources, we expect to have sufficient liquidity to meet our short term obligations (defined as the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2015) and our long-term obligations (defined as the five-

- 27 -

---

 

year period ending September 30, 2019, our time period for long-term budgeting).  If actual developments differ from our expectations, our liquidity could be adversely affected.

Capital expenditures

We currently estimate that we will invest approximately $68 million in capital expenditures to maintain and improve our existing facilities during 2014, including the $39.9 million we have spent through September 30, 2014.

Stock repurchase program

In December 2010 our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2.0 million shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including block purchases, or in privately-negotiated transactions at unspecified prices and over an unspecified period of time.  In 2013, we repurchased 49,000 shares under the plan and 1,951,000 shares are available for repurchase.  

Off-balance sheet financing

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing agreements other than the operating leases discussed in our 2013 Annual Report.

Commitments and contingencies

See Notes 8 and 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of certain income tax examinations currently underway and legal proceedings.

Recent accounting pronouncements

See Note 14 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical accounting policies

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to Part I, Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2013 Annual Report. There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2014.

 

- 28 -

---

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

General

We are exposed to market risk, including currency exchange rates, interest rates and security prices, and raw material prices. There have been no material changes in these market risks since we filed our 2013 Annual Report, and refer you to Part I, Item 7A. - “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in our 2013 Annual Report. See also Note 13 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined by regulations of the SEC, means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. Our management, with the participation of Bobby D. O’Brien, our Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gregory M. Swalwell, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2014. Based upon their evaluation, these executive officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the date of such evaluation.

Internal control over financial reporting

We also maintain internal control over financial reporting.  The term “internal control over financial reporting,” as defined by regulations of the SEC, means a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

As permitted by the SEC, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting excludes (i) internal control over financial reporting of our equity method investees and (ii) internal control over the preparation of our financial statement schedules required by Article 12 of Regulation S-X. However, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting with respect to our equity method investees did include our controls over the recording of amounts related to our investment that are recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including controls over the selection of accounting methods for our investments, the recognition of equity method earnings and losses and the determination, valuation and recording of our investment account balances.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

- 29 -

---

 

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Refer to Note 12 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, our 2013 Annual Report and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014 for descriptions of certain legal proceedings.

Haley Paint et al. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, et al. (United States District Court, for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:10-cv-00318-RDB). We paid the final installment in July 2014, and we and the other defendants have been dismissed with prejudice from this matter.

Los Gatos Mercantile, Inc. d/b/a Los Gatos Ace Hardware, et al v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, et al. (United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:13-cv-01180-SI).  In October 2014, the plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint, with the same allegations as in their original complaint.  Now excluded from the class are indirect purchasers of titanium dioxide in the states of Iowa, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia.

The Valspar Corporation, et al v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, et al. (United States District Court, for the District of Minnesota, Case No. 1:13-cv-03214-RHK-L1B).  In October 2014, the court granted our motion to transfer, and the case is now proceeding in the trial court in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

 

For a discussion of other risk factors related to our businesses, refer to Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” in our 2013 Annual report. There have been no material changes to such risk factors during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

- 30 -

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

- 31 -