SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: December 31, 2002 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from |
Commission file number 1-10233
MAGNETEK, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
95-3917584 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
10900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 850
Los Angeles, California 90024
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(310) 208-1980
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The number of shares outstanding of Registrant's Common Stock, as of February 3, 2003 was 23,527,619 shares.
2003 MAGNETEK FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
MAGNETEK, INC.
Part I. | Financial Information | |||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
4 |
||
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition | 16 | ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 19 | ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 19 | ||
Part II. |
Other Information |
|||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
20 |
||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 20 | ||
Signatures |
21 |
|||
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
22 |
2
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to fairly present the financial position as of December 31, 2002 and the results of operations and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company's latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. Results for the three-months and six-months ended December 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be experienced for the full fiscal year.
This document contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties which in many cases are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be predicted or quantified. As a result, future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to economic conditions in general, sensitivity to industry conditions, competitive factors such as technology and pricing pressures, business conditions in the telecommunications and electronic equipment markets, international sales and operations, dependence on significant customers, increased material costs, risks and costs associated with acquisitions and divestitures, environmental matters and the risk that the Company's ultimate costs of doing business exceed present estimates. Further information on factors that could affect Magnetek's financial results can be found in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
3
MAGNETEK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
December 31, 2002 and 2001
(amounts in thousands, except per share
data)
(unaudited)
|
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net sales | $ | 51,268 | $ | 47,087 | |||
Cost of sales | 45,026 | 36,156 | |||||
Gross profit | 6,242 | 10,931 | |||||
Research and development | 2,945 | 2,326 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | 9,951 | 7,947 | |||||
Goodwill and fixed asset impairment | 34,019 | | |||||
Income (loss) from operations | (40,673 | ) | 658 | ||||
Interest and other (income) expense | 233 | (90 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (40,906 | ) | 748 | ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (721 | ) | 284 | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (40,185 | ) | $ | 464 | ||
Earnings (loss) per common share | |||||||
Basic and diluted: |
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (1.71 | ) | $ | 0.02 | ||
See accompanying notes
4
MAGNETEK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
December 31, 2002 and 2001
(amounts in thousands, except per share
data)
(unaudited)
|
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net sales | $ | 94,094 | $ | 99,543 | |||
Cost of sales | 78,068 | 76,772 | |||||
Gross profit | 16,026 | 22,771 | |||||
Research and development | 5,458 | 4,765 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | 19,415 | 15,738 | |||||
Gain from termination of retiree medical plan | (27,771 | ) | | ||||
Goodwill and fixed asset impairment | 34,019 | | |||||
Income (loss) from operations | (15,095 | ) | 2,268 | ||||
Interest and other (income) expense | 419 | (226 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (15,514 | ) | 2,494 | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 8,928 | 948 | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (24,442 | ) | $ | 1,546 | ||
Earnings (loss) per common share | |||||||
Basic and diluted: |
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||
See accompanying notes
5
MAGNETEK, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2002 and JUNE 30, 2002
(amounts in thousands)
|
December 31 |
June 30 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||
Cash | $ | 2,989 | $ | 4,816 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | 39,595 | 41,532 | |||||||
Inventories | 40,056 | 45,338 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 8,804 | 8,767 | |||||||
Total current assets | 91,444 | 100,453 | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 99,074 | 93,167 | |||||||
Less-accumulated depreciation and amortization |
68,536 |
61,194 |
|||||||
30,538 | 31,973 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 59,729 | 95,533 | |||||||
Prepaid pension and other assets | 73,179 | 76,932 | |||||||
Total Assets | $ | 254,890 | $ | 304,891 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 27,104 | $ | 25,386 | |||||
Accrued liabilities | 15,450 | 18,559 | |||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 436 | 407 | |||||||
Total current liabilities | 42,990 | 44,352 | |||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 3,382 | 3,717 | |||||||
Other long-term obligations |
80,716 |
114,003 |
|||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,507 |
|
|||||||
Stockholders' equity |
|||||||||
Common stock | 236 | 236 | |||||||
Paid in capital in excess of par value | 106,385 | 106,216 | |||||||
Retained earnings | 91,361 | 115,803 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (77,687 | ) | (79,436 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders' equity | 120,295 | 142,819 | |||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 254,890 | $ | 304,891 | |||||
See accompanying notes
6
MAGNETEK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
December 31, 2002 and 2001
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (24,442 | ) | $ | 1,546 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,581 | 4,497 | |||||||
Gain from termination of retiree medical, net of tax | (17,218 | ) | | ||||||
Goodwill and fixed asset impairment | 34,019 | | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | 4,116 | (13,872 | ) | ||||||
Total adjustments | 25,498 | (9,375 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 1,056 | (7,829 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued businesses and other assets | | 24,264 | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (2,704 | ) | (4,314 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (2,704 | ) | 19,950 | ||||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 169 | 648 | |||||||
Stock repurchases | | (3,916 | ) | ||||||
Repayment of bank and other long term obligations | (306 | ) | (5,943 | ) | |||||
Increase in deferred financing costs | (42 | ) | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (179 | ) | (9,211 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | $ | (1,827 | ) | $ | 2,910 | ||||
Cash at the beginning of the period | 4,816 | 5,310 | |||||||
Cash at the end of the period | $ | 2,989 | $ | 8,220 | |||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for: | |||||||||
Interest | $ | 279 | $ | | |||||
Income taxes | $ | 520 | $ | (42 | ) |
See accompanying notes
7
MAGNETEK, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2002
(All dollar amounts are in thousands)
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for fiscal year end financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company uses a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Sunday nearest to June 30. Fiscal quarters are the thirteen or fourteen week periods ending on the Sunday nearest September 30, December 31, March 31 and June 30. For clarity of presentation, all periods are presented as if they ended on the last day of the calendar period. The three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 each contained thirteen and twenty-six weeks respectively.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of ConsolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Magnetek, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Management estimates are used in, but not limited to, accounting for accounts receivable allowances, inventory allowances, depreciation and amortization, asset impairment, pension benefits, contingencies and taxes. Due to inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual circumstances could differ from our estimates resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Revenue RecognitionThe Company's policy is to record and recognize sales only upon shipment.
InventoriesInventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Property,Plant and EquipmentAdditions and improvement are capitalized at cost, whereas expenditures for maintenance and repair are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets (ranging from three to forty years) principally using the straight-line method.
GoodwillIn June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations", and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".
SFAS No. 141 supercedes APB Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations", and SFAS No. 38, "Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased Enterprises". SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method. The Company's acquisition in May 2002 of LAB Communications, Inc. was accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
8
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests, or interim impairment tests if certain indicators arise. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are also no longer subject to amortization. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", effective July 1, 2001. Under the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company completed the required impairment tests by December 2001 and found no indication of impairment. The Company also completed the required annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and found no indication of impairment as of the April 2002 measurement date. During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company performed interim tests for impairment of goodwill (see Note 7 of "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements").
Stock CompensationThe Company has elected to use the intrinsic-value method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" in accounting for stock based awards to employees. Under APB 25, the Company recognizes no compensation expense with respect to such awards when the exercise price is equal to or greater than the market price at the date of grant.
Pension BenefitsThe valuation of the Company's pension plan requires the use of assumptions and estimates that are used to develop actuarial valuations of expenses, assets and liabilities. These assumptions include discount rates, investment returns, projected salary increases and mortality rates. Changes in assumptions and future interest rates and investment returns could potentially have a material impact on the Company's expenses and related funding requirements.
Derivative Financial InstrumentsThe Company uses derivative financial instruments to reduce financial market risks. These instruments are used to hedge foreign currency and interest rate market exposures. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The accounting policies for these instruments are based on the Company's designation of such instruments as hedging transactions. The criteria the Company uses for designating an instrument as a hedge include the instrument's effectiveness in risk reduction and the matching of the derivative to the underlying transaction. The resulting gains or losses are accounted for as part of the transactions being hedged, except for losses not expected to be recovered upon the completion of the hedge transaction, which are expensed.
Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", was issued, which supercedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" and the accounting and reporting provision of APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual, and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions". SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and removes goodwill from its scope and clarified other implementation issues related to SFAS No. 121. SFAS No. 144 also provides a single framework for evaluating long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
9
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities", which nullified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)". SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure" (SFAS 148) which amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and requires more prominent and more frequent disclosures in the financial statements of the effects of stock-based compensation. The provisions of SFAS 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and the interim disclosure provisions are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company will provide the required interim and annual disclosures beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
3. Inventories
Inventories at December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002 consist of the following:
|
December 31 |
June 30 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw materials and stock parts | $ | 22,505 | $ | 29,201 | ||
Work-in-process | 13,078 | 10,747 | ||||
Finished goods | 4,473 | 5,390 | ||||
$ | 40,056 | $ | 45,338 | |||
The above figures as of December 31, 2002 reflect a charge of $4.7 million to write down the value of excess telecom-related inventory.
4. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a party to a number of product liability lawsuits, many of which involve fires allegedly caused by defective lighting ballasts. All of these cases are being defended by the Company, and management believes that its insurers will bear all liability, except for applicable deductibles, and that none of these proceedings individually or in the aggregate will have a material effect on the Company. In June 2001 the Company sold its Lighting business.
10
The Company is frequently named, along with numerous other defendants, in asbestos-related lawsuits. While the outcome of these cases cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company is aggressively seeking to be dismissed from them and does not believe the proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its finances or operations. The Company has never produced asbestos-containing products and is either contractually indemnified against liability for asbestos-related claims or believes that it has no liability for such claims, all of which arise from business operations the Company acquired but no longer owns.
In April 1998, Ole K. Nilssen filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement by the Company of seven of his patents pertaining to electronic ballast technology. Mr. Nilssen seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief to preclude the Company from making, using or selling products allegedly infringing his patents. The Company denies that any of its products infringe any valid patent and has filed a response asserting its affirmative defenses, as well as a counterclaim for a judicial declaration that its products do not infringe the patents asserted by Nilssen and also that the asserted patents are invalid. The Company intends to vigorously defend against Nilssen's claims and believes it has strong defenses. Although it cannot predict the outcome of the lawsuit, an unfavorable judgement could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
The Company has from time to time discovered the existence of hazardous substances at certain of its facilities. In response, the Company conducts remediation activities to bring its facilities into compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Company's remediation activities for fiscal 2002 did not involve material expenditures, and the Company does not expect its expenditures for fiscal 2003 to be material. The Company has also been identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and certain state agencies as a potentially responsible party for cleanup costs associated with alleged past waste disposal practices at several facilities and offsite locations. Its remediation activities as a potentially responsible party were not material for fiscal 2002 and are not expected to be material for fiscal 2003. Although the materiality of future expenditures for environmental activities may be affected by the level and type of contamination, the extent and nature of cleanup activities required by governmental authorities, the nature of the Company's alleged connection to the contaminated sites, the number and financial resources of other potentially responsible parties, the availability of indemnification rights against third parties and the identification of additional contaminated sites, the Company's estimated share of liability, if any, for environmental remediation is not expected to be material.
In connection with certain divestitures, the Company has agreed, from time to time, to indemnify buyers with respect to environmental liabilities associated with the divested operations, subject to various conditions and limitations. Expenditures related to the Company's indemnification obligations were not material in fiscal 2002 and are not expected to be material in fiscal 2003. Although future expenditures pursuant to such indemnification obligations could be material, depending upon the extent and nature of subsequently discovered contamination, the Company does not expect its obligations to require material expenditures.
11
Prior to the Company's purchase of Century Electric, Inc. ("Century Electric") in 1986, Century Electric acquired a business from Gould Inc. ("Gould") in May 1983 that included a leasehold interest in a fractional horsepower electric motor manufacturing facility located in McMinnville, Tennessee. In connection with this acquisition, Gould agreed to indemnify Century Electric from and against liabilities and expenses arising out of the handling and cleanup of certain waste materials, including but not limited to cleaning up any polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs") at the McMinnville facility (the "1983 Indemnity").
Investigation has revealed the presence of PCBs and other substances, including solvents, in the soil and in the groundwater underlying the facility and in certain offsite soil, sediment and biota samples. Century Electric notified the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Superfund, of the test results from its investigation and the McMinnville plant is listed as a Tennessee Inactive Hazardous Waste Substance Site. A report on the site was presented to the Tennessee legislature and community officials and plant employees were notified of the presence of contaminants at the McMinnville facility. In 1995, Gould completed an interim remedial excavation and disposal of onsite soil containing PCBs. Gould also conducted a preliminary investigation and cleanup of certain onsite and offsite contamination. The cost of any further investigation and cleanup of onsite and offsite contamination cannot presently be determined, but the Company believes such costs (including ancillary costs) are covered by the 1983 Indemnity. The Company sold its leasehold interest in the McMinnville plant and while the Company believes that Gould will continue to perform substantially under its indemnity obligations, Gould's substantial failure to perform such obligations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
The Company acquired the stock of Universal Manufacturing Company ("Universal") from a predecessor of Fruit of the Loom ("FOL"), and the predecessor agreed to indemnify the Company against certain environmental liabilities arising from Universal's pre-acquisition activities. Environmental liabilities covered by the indemnification agreement include completion of additional cleanup activities, if any, at the Bridgeport, Connecticut facility (recently sold in connection with the sale of the transformer business) and defense and indemnification against liability related to offsite disposal locations where Magnetek may have a share of potential response costs. In 1999 FOL filed a petition for Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Company filed a proof of claim in the proceeding for obligations related to the environmental indemnification agreement. The Company believes that FOL has substantially completed the clean-up obligations required by the indemnification agreement. In November 2001, the Company and FOL entered into an agreement involving the allocation of certain potential tax credits and Magnetek withdrew its claims in the bankruptcy proceeding. FOL's ability to set aside any remaining obligations to the states of Connecticut and New Jersey through bankruptcy, or the discovery of additional environmental contamination at the Bridgeport facility, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Beginning in 1997, the Company entered into a number of swap transactions with Bank of America ("B of A") to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on its outstanding debt. One swap transaction included a provision that allowed B of A, at its sole option, to extend the transaction
12
for a five-year period upon expiration. Prior to August 1999, the Company paid off all of its outstanding debt and the hedging strategy put in place with B of A was no longer necessary or desirable. Beginning in August 1999, the Company, with B of A's assistance, began unwinding the swap transactions and in December 1999, it unwound the last remaining swap, which was subject to the extension. On June 26, 2002, the Company received notice that B of A intended to exercise the extension of the underlying swap, which at that point had been terminated for two and a half years. Prior to this date, and subsequent to December 1999 the Company had no contact from B of A (which was also the agent bank under its credit agreement) regarding the alleged survival of this extension. As a result of the significant decline in interest rates since December 1999, the present value of such a swap, given current interest rates, would be approximately $3.0 million in favor of B of A. A dispute has arisen between the Company and B of A regarding whether the right to extend the swap was also terminated in December 1999 along with the underlying swap and whether a right to extend a terminated contractual agreement exists.
In December 2002, the Company filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Bank of America. Bank of America has removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and the Company is seeking to have the case remanded back to State court. The Company intends to vigorously prosecute this lawsuit.
5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the fiscal quarters and six months to date ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
Fiscal Quarter
|
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) | $ | (40,185 | ) | $ | 464 | ||
Currency translation adjustment | 2,176 | (2,357 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (38,009 | ) | $ | (1,893 | ) | |
Six Months to Date
|
2002 |
2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income (loss) | $ | (24,442 | ) | $ | 1,546 | |
Currency translation adjustment | 1,749 | 1,722 | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (22,693 | ) | $ | 3,268 | |
13
6. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
Six Months Ended Ended December 31 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (40,185 | ) | $ | 464 | $ | (24,442 | ) | $ | 1,546 | |||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share |
23,518 |
22,519 |
23,515 |
22,531 |
|||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
$ |
0.02 |
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
$ |
0.07 |
|||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (40,185 | ) | $ | 464 | $ | (24,442 | ) | $ | 1,546 | |||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share |
23,518 |
22,519 |
23,515 |
22,531 |
|||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options | | 81 | | 262 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share | 23,518 | 22,600 | 23,515 | 22,793 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
$ |
0.02 |
$ |
(1.04 |
) |
$ |
0.07 |
|||
7. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reporting unit, net of accumulated amortization of $9,720, are as follows:
|
Telecom Power |
Power Electronics |
Industrial Controls |
Total |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at June 30, 2002 | $ | 36,301 | $ | 33,509 | $ | 25,723 | $ | 95,533 | |||||
Purchase price adjustments and reclassifications |
(2,859 |
) |
|
|
(2,859 |
) |
|||||||
Currency translation |
|
514 |
(17 |
) |
497 |
||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
(33,442 |
) |
|
|
(33,442 |
) |
|||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
$ |
|
$ |
34,023 |
$ |
25,706 |
$ |
59,729 |
|||||
As a result of the decline in the Company's market capitalization in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the continuing decline in the telecommunications (telecom) market, and anticipated reduced demand of telecom power system spending in the future, the Company determined that there were indicators of impairment in the carrying value of goodwill related to acquisitions made within the past two fiscal years in the telecom industry. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company performed an interim test for goodwill impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142. At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company had goodwill of $95.5 million resulting from acquisitions.
14
Upon completing the interim impairment tests, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $33.4 million related to the telecom acquisitions.
8. Subsequent Events
Subsequent to the end of the fiscal second quarter, the Company acquired Telemotive Industrial Controls for approximately $4.7 million. The purchase was funded with proceeds from the Company's domestic revolving loan facility. Telemotive is a manufacturer of wireless remote controls and anti-collision systems for overhead cranes, hoists, monorail systems, conveyors, locomotives and other material handling applications, and reported revenue of approximately $10.0 million in its last fiscal year.
15
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Critical Accounting Policies
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements. In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For additional information regarding our critical accounting policies and significant assumptions, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, or to the footnotes included in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
Net Sales and Gross Profit
Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2003 were $51.3 million, an increase of 8.9% from the second quarter of fiscal 2002 sales of $47.1 million. The revenue increase is due to higher sales of industrial control and consumer products, partially offset by lower revenues in telecommunications. We expect continued weakness in telecommunications and information technology markets, and we believe the slowdown in telecommunications may continue at least through fiscal 2003. Accordingly we have focused on gaining share in all addressed markets and on new product introductions in industrial and consumer markets. We expect our third quarter revenue to remain relatively flat with the second quarter, as continuing softness in the general economy and telecommunications are expected to offset higher revenues in markets other than telecommunications.
Our current year second quarter gross profit was $6.2 million, or 12.2% of sales, versus $10.9 million, or 23.2% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. The current year gross profit reflects a charge of $4.7 million to write down the value of telecom-related inventory based upon past and expected future demand. Excluding this charge gross profit would have been 21.3% of sales. Lower sales and margins in telecom power and related service revenue also negatively impacted gross profit. Also, the strength in the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar compressed gross profits on sales from our European subsidiary denominated in U.S. dollars, negatively impacting power supply gross profits.
Research and Development, Selling, General and Administrative
We continued to increase our investment in research and development (R&D). R&D expense was $2.9 million, or 5.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $2.3 million, or 4.9% of sales, in fiscal 2002. We increased spending in new product development aimed at diverse consumer markets, our fastest growing product line. We continue to invest in new power-electronic platforms and applications and expand the breadth of existing product lines.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense was $10.0 million (19.4% of sales) in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 versus $7.9 million (16.9% of sales) in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. This increase was due to volume-related selling expenses, increased headcount in sales and marketing, an increase in our provision for uncollectible accounts receivable, and increased pension, insurance and advertising expenses. Our second quarter fiscal 2003 selling expenses were $4.2 million versus $3.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2002, due to higher spending to improve our sales capabilities, increase brand awareness and develop our domestic OEM and distribution sales channels. Our second quarter fiscal 2003 pension expense was $0.4 million compared to a prior year second quarter income amount of $0.1 million. We expect this higher level of pension expense to occur
16
throughout fiscal 2003. We also recorded a $0.3 million charge to write down the value of accounts receivable due from telecom customers.
Goodwill and Fixed Asset Impairment
During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we determined that there were indicators of impairment in the carrying value of goodwill, based on the decline in our market capitalization and the continuing decline in the telecommunications industry. We performed an interim impairment test in accordance with SFAS 142 based on updated forecasts of operating results and cash flows, and we recorded a $33.4 million goodwill impairment charge. The charge relates exclusively to our telecommunications business and effectively reduces the carrying value of goodwill for that business to zero.
We also performed an impairment review of our long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS 144. Based upon utilization and current market values of certain fixed assets, notably in our telecommunications business, we recorded a $0.6 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of those assets.
Interest and Other Expense (Income)
Net interest expense was $0.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to net interest income of $0.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase in net interest expense is attributable to reductions in our cash and cash equivalents balances from the prior year.
Net Income (Loss)
We recorded an after-tax loss of $40.2 million, including the impact of the impairment charges, in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, compared to an after-tax profit of $0.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. Excluding all telecom-related asset write downs and impairment charges, we would have recorded an after-tax loss of $1.1 million. The tax benefit in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 was $0.7 million (2% effective rate) versus $0.3 million (38% effective rate) in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. The difference in the effective income tax rate is due mainly to the fact that there was no tax benefit associated with the $33.4 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the current period, as the goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
Net Sales and Gross Profit
Our net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2003 were $94.1 million, a 5.4% decrease from sales of $99.5 million for the first six months of fiscal 2002. Current year revenue was negatively impacted by weakness in the general economy as well as continued weakness in certain served markets, notably telecommunications and information technology.
Our fiscal 2003 gross profit for the first six months was $16.0 million, or 17.0% of sales, versus $22.8 million, or 22.9% of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2002. The fiscal 2003 gross profit reflects a charge of $4.7 million to write down the value of telecom-related inventory based upon past and expected future demand. Excluding this charge gross profit would have been $20.7 million, or 22.0% of sales. Lower sales and margins in telecom power and related service revenue also negatively impacted gross profit. Also, the strength in the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar compressed gross profits on sales from our European subsidiary denominated in U.S. dollars, negatively impacting power supply gross profits.
Research and Development, Selling, General and Administrative
Research and development (R&D) expense was $5.5 million, or 5.8% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2003 compared to $4.8 million, or 4.8% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2002.
17
We increased spending in new product development aimed at diverse consumer markets, our fastest growing product line. We continue to invest in new power-electronic platforms and applications and expand the breadth of existing product lines.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense was $19.4 million (20.6% of sales) for the first six months of fiscal 2003 versus $15.7 million (15.8% of sales) for the first six months of fiscal 2002. This increase was due to increased headcount in sales and marketing, and increased pension, insurance and advertising expenses. Fiscal 2003 selling expenses were $8.3 million for the first six months versus $7.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2002, due to higher spending to improve our sales capabilities, increase brand awareness and develop our domestic OEM and distribution sales channels. Pension expense was $0.8 million for the first six months of fiscal 2003 compared to pension income of $0.5 million for the same period in fiscal 2002. We expect this higher level of pension expense to occur throughout fiscal 2003.
Gain from Termination of Retiree Medical Plan
Fiscal 2003 results for the first six months include a nonrecurring pre-tax gain of $27.8 million related to the termination in the first quarter of our retiree medical plan. The financial impact in future fiscal quarters subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2003 will be a reduction of income from operations of approximately $0.4 million, due to elimination of the amortization credit associated with the related liability. However, we will realize a positive quarterly cash impact of approximately the same amount.
Goodwill and Fixed Asset Impairment
During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we determined that there were indicators of impairment in the carrying value of goodwill, based on the decline in our market capitalization and the continuing decline in the telecommunications industry. We performed an interim impairment test in accordance with SFAS 142 based on updated forecasts of operating results and cash flows, and we recorded a $33.4 million goodwill impairment charge. The charge relates exclusively to our telecommunications business and effectively reduces the carrying value of goodwill for that business to zero.
We also performed an impairment review of our long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS 144. Based upon utilization and current market values of certain fixed assets, notably in our telecommunications business, we recorded a $0.6 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of those assets.
Interest and Other Expense (Income)
Net interest expense was $0.4 million for the first six months of fiscal 2003 compared to net interest income of $0.2 million for the same period in fiscal 2002. The increase in net interest expense is attributable to reductions in our cash and cash equivalents balances from the prior year.
Net Income (Loss)
We recorded an after-tax loss of $24.4 million, including the impact of both the nonrecurring gain and the impairment charges, for the first six months of fiscal 2003, compared to an after-tax profit of $1.5 million for the first six months of fiscal 2002. Excluding the impact of the nonrecurring gain and all telecom-related asset write downs and impairment charges, we would have recorded an after-tax loss of $2.6 million. The tax provision for the first six months of fiscal 2003 was $8.9 million versus $0.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2002. While we recorded a pretax operating loss of $15.5 million for the first six months of fiscal 2003, we also recorded a tax provision during the same period, associated mainly with the $27.8 million nonrecurring gain recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. There was no tax benefit associated with the $33.4 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, as the goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
18
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2002, long-term borrowings (including current portion and representing primarily capital leases and notes payable in Europe) were $3.8 million compared to $4.1 million as of June 30, 2002. We have an agreement (the "Agreement") with a group of banks to provide up to $40.0 million under a revolving loan facility. Available borrowings are based upon specific levels of domestic accounts receivable and inventories measured on a quarterly basis. The facility also supports the issuance of letters of credit. Our European subsidiary also maintains borrowing arrangements with local banks, primarily to support working capital needs. As of December 31, 2002, no borrowings were outstanding under any bank lending facility. Subsequent to the end of the second fiscal quarter, the Company acquired Telemotive Industrial Controls for a cash purchase price of approximately $4.7 million (see Note 8 of "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements"). The purchase was funded with proceeds from the domestic revolving loan facility and as of February 12, 2003, borrowings of approximately $4.7 million were outstanding under the Agreement. Primarily as a result of the non-cash charges recorded during the second fiscal quarter in accordance with SFAS Nos. 142 and 144, the banks have taken the position that the Company is in violation of certain financial covenants contained in the Agreement. We are negotiating with the banks for an amendment to resolve the issue. Such amendment will likely include a reduction in the lending commitment under the Agreement and restrictions on disbursements for, among other things, dividend payments, stock repurchases and acquisitions. We also have available borrowings under our European bank lines, which provide additional liquidity for the Company. While management believes that it will be able to reach agreement with the banks regarding an amendment, the inability to do so could have an adverse impact on the Company's liquidity.
Capital expenditures in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 were $1.6 million, with $2.7 million in capital expenditures for the first six months of fiscal 2003. We anticipate that our capital expenditures for the fiscal year will be less than $6.0 million.
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the first six months of fiscal 2003.
As a result of the decline in stock market equity values over the past six months, the accumulated benefit obligation of our defined benefit pension plan exceeds plan assets as of the end of December 31, 2002. The amount and timing of future contributions to the plan are dependent upon values in equity and fixed income markets, and to a lesser extent, the level of interest rates. While no contributions are mandated, we may elect to make contributions to the plan during fiscal 2003.
Based upon current plans and business conditions, management believes that, subject to negotiating a satisfactory amendment to the Agreement, borrowing capacity under our revolving loan facilities and internally generated cash flows will be sufficient to fund anticipated working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other near-term commitments during the next twelve months.
ITEM 3 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risks in the areas of foreign exchange and interest rates. To mitigate the effect of such risks, the Company selectively utilizes specific financial instruments. Company policy clearly prohibits the use of such financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. There have been no material changes in the reported market risks since that reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated June 30, 2002.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures was performed by management within 90 days of the filing of this report, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO believe the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2002.
Changes in Internal Controls
In the quarter ended December 31, 2002, there were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
19
See Part I, Item 1, Note 4.
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
10.1 | Change of Control Agreement dated December 11, 2002 between Pete McCormick and MagneTek, Inc. | |
99.1 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
99.2 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
Form 8-K dated January 27, 2003, Press release announcing revaluation of assets based on impairment tests.
Form 8-K dated February 6, 2003, Press release announcing results for the second quarter and the first half of fiscal year 2003.
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MAGNETEK, INC. (Registrant) |
|||
Date: February 14, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID P. REILAND David P. Reiland Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly authorized officer of the registrant and principal financial officer) |
21
Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Andrew G. Galef, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Magnetek, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: February 14, 2003
/s/ ANDREW G. GALEF Andrew G. Galef Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
22
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David P. Reiland, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Magnetek, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: February 14, 2003
/s/ DAVID P. REILAND David P. Reiland Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
23