UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number 0-21719

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana		35-1929476
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6714 Pointe Inverness Way, Suite 200, Fort Wayne, IN		46804
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (260) 459-3553

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (see definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

(Check one): Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of April 23, 2007, Registrant had 94,493,520 outstanding shares of Common Stock.

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.
Table of Contents

PART I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements:

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	3

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	9

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	13

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	13



PART II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	14

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	14

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	19

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	20

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	20

Item 5.	Other Information	20

Item 6.	Exhibits	20

	Signatures	21

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

	March 31, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and equivalents	$	28,332		$	29,373
Accounts receivable, net	383,632			355,011
Accounts receivable-related parties	38,346			53,365
Inventories	626,218			569,317
Deferred taxes	13,611			13,964
Other current assets	10,593			15,167
Total current assets	1,100,732			1,036,197

Property, plant and equipment, net	1,161,914			1,136,703

Restricted cash	6,022			5,702

Intangible assets	11,973			12,226

Goodwill	30,966			30,966

Other assets	29,785			25,223
Total assets	$	2,341,392		$	2,247,017

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	218,156		$	145,938
Accounts payable-related parties	7,316			2,004
Income taxes payable	85,347			30,497
Accrued profit sharing	15,803			46,341
Accrued expenses	79,114			94,024
Current maturities of long-term debt	95,693			80,686
Total current liabilities	501,429			399,490

Long-term debt
Senior unsecured 9½% notes	300,000			300,000
Subordinated convertible 4.0% notes	37,500			37,500
Other long-term debt	16,836			16,920
Unamortized bond premium	3,350			3,772
	357,686			358,192

Deferred taxes	256,128			256,803

Minority interest	1,043			1,424

Stockholders’ equity
Common stock voting, $.005 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 108,082,420 and 107,865,486 shares issued, and 94,510,185 and 96,983,303 shares outstanding, as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively	538			537
Treasury stock, at cost; 13,572,235 and 10,882,183 shares, at March 31, 2007and December 31, 2006, respectively	(332,019		)	(230,472		)
Additional paid-in capital	375,887			367,772
Retained earnings	1,180,700			1,093,271
Total stockholders’ equity	1,225,106			1,231,108
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,341,392		$	2,247,017

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006

Net sales
Unrelated parties	$	824,385		$	608,618
Related parties	41,289			57,260
Total net sales	865,674			665,878

Costs of goods sold	649,271			506,391
Gross profit	216,403			159,487

Selling, general and administrative expenses	45,092			28,375
Operating income	171,311			131,112

Interest expense	7,246			8,136
Other (income) expense, net	(715		)	(681		)
Income before income taxes	164,780			123,657

Income taxes	62,616			47,608

Net income	$	102,164		$	76,049

Basic earnings per share	$	1.06		$	.87

Weighted average common shares outstanding	96,316			87,034

Diluted earnings per share, including the effect of assumed conversions	$	1.01		$	.76

Weighted average common shares and share equivalents outstanding	101,637			100,976

Dividends declared per share	$	.15		$	.10

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006

Operating activities:
Net income	$	102,164		$	76,049

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	29,265			24,917
Equity-based compensation	2,269			1,413
Deferred income taxes	(321		)	128
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	(6		)	46
Minority interest	(381		)	239
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(13,602		)	(19,187		)
Inventories	(56,901		)	17,179
Other assets	(796		)	3,020
Accounts payable	77,341			22,063
Income taxes payable	54,850			38,016
Accrued expenses	(45,447		)	(26,438		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	148,435			137,445

Investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(53,929		)	(14,585		)
Other investing activities	(223		)	(4,700		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(54,152		)	(19,285		)

Financing activities:
Issuance of debt	145,000			—
Repayment of debt	(130,078		)	(6,658		)
Issuance of common stock (net of expenses) and proceeds and tax benefits from exercise of stock options	7,187			14,340
Issuance (purchase) of treasury stock	(102,886		)	8,664
Dividends paid	(14,547		)	(4,319		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(95,324		)	12,027

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents	(1,041		)	130,187
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period	29,373			65,518

Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	28,332		$	195,705

Supplemental disclosure information:
Cash paid for interest	$	16,339		$	14,268
Cash paid for federal and state income taxes	$	468		$	1,176

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Summary of Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Steel Dynamics, Inc. (SDI), together with its subsidiaries after elimination of significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Minority interest represents the minority shareholders’ proportionate share in the equity or income of the company’s consolidated subsidiaries.

The company previously had two reporting segments: steel operations and steel scrap substitute operations. With the addition of three joist fabrication facilities acquired with the Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation (Roanoke Electric) merger in April 2006, the company added a third reporting segment: Steel Fabrication. With the addition of two steel scrap processing locations pursuant to the merger, the company changed the steel scrap substitute operations segment to steel scrap and scrap substitute operations.

Roanoke Electric operating results have been reflected in the company’s financial statements since April 12, 2006. The following unaudited pro forma information is presented below as if the merger was completed as of January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Net sales	$	815,110
Net income	82,116
Basic earnings per share	.85
Diluted earnings per share	.75

The information presented above is for information purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the merger been consummated at January 1, 2006, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results of the combined companies under the ownership and management of the company. The pro forma results reflect Roanoke Electric operations for the three-month period ended January 31, 2006, representing the pre merger operations of Roanoke Electric for the first quarter.

Uncertain Tax Positions. In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined. FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not have a significant impact on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

As of January 1, 2007, the company had unrecognized tax benefits of $24.0 million including accrued interest and penalties. There has been no significant change in the unrecognized tax benefits during the period ended March 31, 2007. If recognized, the effective tax rate would be affected by the unrecognized tax benefits. The company recognizes interest and penalties related to its tax contingencies on a net-of-tax basis in income tax expense. The company’s January 1, 2007 tax contingencies included $1.7 million of interest and penalties.

The company files U.S. federal income tax returns as well as income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. The company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for calendar years 1997 through 2001 and it expects this audit to be completed by the end of 2007. The company may be subject to examination by the IRS for calendar years 2003 through 2006. The company is currently under examination by the state of Indiana for calendar years 2000 through 2005. It is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits could change in the next 12 months as a result of these audits. Based on the current audits in process, the payment of taxes as a result of audit settlements could be from zero to $24.0 million during the next 12 months. For other major state tax jurisdictions, the company is no longer subject to state and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.

Use of Estimates. These financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, accordingly, include amounts that require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and in the notes thereto. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and goodwill; valuation allowances for trade receivables, inventories and deferred income tax assets; potential environmental liabilities, litigation claims and settlements. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim period results. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Note 2. Subsequent Events

Elizabethton Herb & Metal. The company purchased the land, property, plant and equipment and inventory of Elizabethton Herb & Metal, Inc. (Elizabethton) on April 1, 2007. Elizabethton is comprised of two scrap processing yards located in Elizabethton and Johnson City, Tennessee. These two yards generally process in excess of 225,000 tons of ferrous scrap annually. Elizabethton supplied the company’s Roanoke Bar Division with a portion of its steel scrap requirements before the purchase and will continue to do so. Beginning April 1, 2007, Elizabethton operations will be reflected in the company’s steel scrap and steel scrap substitute operating segment.

Senior Notes Issuance. On April 3, 2007, the company issued $500 million of 6¾% Senior Notes due 2015 (Notes). The net proceeds from the Notes were used to redeem the company’s existing $300 million 9½% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2009 (9½% Notes) at a redemption price of 102.375% on May 3, 2007, to repay amounts outstanding under the company’s senior secured revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes, including funding of capital expenditures. In connection with the redemption of the 9½% Notes, the company also terminated its underlying $200 million fair-value interest rate swap at an after-tax cost of $2.8 million, which will be recognized as a loss on hedging transactions during the second quarter of 2007. In addition, the company expects to record additional after-tax expense during the second quarter of approximately $4.2 million related to the redemption premium, the recognition of the remaining unamortized bond premium, the write-off of previously capitalized financing costs, and the additional interest expense incurred while the 9½% Notes remained outstanding during the 30-day redemption-notice period.

Note 3. Earnings Per Share

The company computes and presents earnings per common share in accordance with FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes, in addition to the above, the weighted average dilutive effect of common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents represent dilutive stock options and dilutive shares related to the company’s convertible subordinated debt and are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the company’s basic and diluted earnings per share computations for net income for the three-month periods ended March 31 (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended
	2007					2006
	Net Income		Shares	Per Share		Net Income		Shares	Per Share
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)	Amount		(Numerator)		(Denominator)	Amount
Basic earnings per share	$	102,164	96,316	$	1.06	$	76,049	87,034	$	.87
Dilutive stock option effect	—		911			—		867
Subordinated convertible 4.0% notes	214		4,410			665		13,075
Diluted earnings per share	$	102,378	101,637	$	1.01	$	76,714	100,976	$	.76

Note 4. Inventories

Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006
Raw materials	$	286,409	$	243,770
Supplies	137,063		130,373
Work-in-progress	60,888		54,555
Finished goods	141,858		140,619
Total inventories	$	626,218	$	569,317

Note 5. Segment Information

The company has three segments: steel operations, steel fabrication operations and steel scrap and scrap substitute operations.

The company previously had two reporting segments: steel operations and steel scrap substitute operations. With the addition of three joist fabrication facilities acquired with the Roanoke Electric merger in April 2006, the company added a third reporting segment: Steel Fabrication Operations. With the addition of two steel scrap processing locations pursuant to the merger, the company changed the steel scrap substitute operations segment to steel scrap and scrap substitute operations.

Steel operations include the company’s Flat Roll Division, Structural and Rail Division, Engineered Bar Products Division, and since the April 2006 merger, also include the Roanoke Bar Division and Steel of West Virginia operations. These operations consist of mini-mills, producing steel from steel scrap, using electric arc furnaces, continuous casting and automated rolling mills.

Steel fabrication operations include the company’s five New Millennium Building System’s plants located in Butler, Indiana; Continental, Ohio; Salem, Virginia; Florence, South Carolina; and Lake City, Florida. Revenues from these plants are generated from the fabrication of trusses, girders, steel joists and steel decking. Prior to the April 2006 merger, the revenues associated with these operations were included in “All Other”, as the operations were below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments. Accordingly, the company has reclassified these revenues from prior periods to conform to the current presentation.

The steel scrap and scrap substitute operations include the revenues and expenses associated with the company’s two steel scrap processing locations since the April 2006 merger and from the company’s scrap substitute manufacturing facility, Iron Dynamics.

Revenues included in the category “All Other” are from a subsidiary operation that is below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments. These revenues are from the further processing and resale of certain secondary and excess flat rolled steel products. In addition, “All Other” also includes certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company’s senior secured credit facilities, senior unsecured notes, convertible subordinated notes, certain other investments and profit sharing expenses.

The company’s operations are organized and managed as operating segments. Operating segment performance and resource allocations are primarily based on operating results before income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are consistent with those described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Refer to the company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for more information related to the company’s segment reporting. Inter-segment sales and any related profits are eliminated in consolidation.

The company’s segment results for the three month periods ended March 31 are as follows (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended
		2007			2006

Steel Operations	Net sales
	External	$	763,756		$	604,955
	Other segments	65,819			28,049
	Operating income	186,820			146,472
	Assets	1,860,267			1,394,886
Steel Fabrication Operations	Net sales
	External	$	78,377		$	40,850
	Other segments	4,847			21
	Operating income	5,120			3,228
	Assets	187,889			100,365
Steel Scrap and Scrap Substitute Operations	Net sales
	External	$	3,181		$	—
	Other segments	29,868			11,252
	Operating income (loss)	1,723			(6,565		)
	Assets	151,441			135,251
All Other	Net sales
	External	$	20,359		$	20,073
	Other segments	217			219
	Operating loss	(22,095		)	(13,090		)
	Assets	405,808			299,982
Eliminations	Net sales
	External	$	—		$	—
	Other segments	(100,750		)	(39,541		)
	Operating income (loss)	(257		)	1,067
	Assets	(264,013		)	(48,865		)
Consolidated	Net sales	$	865,674		$	665,878
	Operating income	171,311			131,112
	Assets	2,341,392			1,881,619
	Net sales to non-US companies	38,662			15,269

Note 6. Condensed Consolidating Information

Certain 100%-owned subsidiaries of SDI have fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the indebtedness relating to the issuance of $300.0 million of senior notes due March 2009. Following are condensed consolidating financial statements of the company, including the guarantors. The following condensed consolidating financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of (i) SDI (in each case, reflecting investments in its consolidated subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting), (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries of SDI, (iii) the non-guarantor subsidiaries of SDI, and (iv) the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for the company on a consolidated basis. The following condensed consolidating financial statements (presented dollars in thousands) should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

							Combined			Consolidating			Total
As of March 31, 2007	Parent			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Adjustments			Consolidated
Cash	$	10,645		$	16,674		$	1,013		$	—		$	28,332
Accounts receivable	291,669			296,113			9,393			(175,197		)	421,978
Inventories	462,486			163,405			9,169			(8,842		)	626,218
Other current assets	23,224			785			240			(45		)	24,204
Total current assets	788,024			476,977			19,815			(184,084		)	1,100,732
Property, plant and equipment, net	959,293			194,998			7,741			(118		)	1,161,914
Other assets	385,442			104,873			400			(411,969		)	78,746
Total assets	$	2,132,759		$	776,848		$	27,956		$	(596,171	)	$	2,341,392

Accounts payable	$	263,236		$	46,995		$	6,600		$	(6,012	)	$	310,819
Accrued expenses	65,860			29,083			967			(993		)	94,917
Current maturities of long-term debt	95,671			22			8,207			(8,207		)	95,693
Total current liabilities	424,767			76,100			15,774			(15,212		)	501,429
Other liabilities	144,903			180,469			3,489			(72,733		)	256,128
Long-term debt	357,548			137			2,881			(2,880		)	357,686
Minority interest	(176		)	—			—			1,219			1,043

Common stock	538			19,753			7,746			(27,499		)	538
Treasury stock	(332,019		)	(818		)	—			818			(332,019		)
Additional paid in capital	375,887			117,753			—			(117,753		)	375,887
Retained earnings	1,161,311			383,454			(1,934		)	(362,131		)	1,180,700
Total stockholders’ equity	1,205,717			520,142			5,812			(506,565		)	1,225,106
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,132,759		$	776,848		$	27,956		$	(596,171	)	$	2,341,392

						Combined			Consolidating			Total
As of December 31, 2006	Parent			Guarantors		Non-Guarantors			Adjustments			Consolidated
Cash	$	15,571		$	12,610	$	1,192		$	—		$	29,373
Accounts receivable	291,521			282,152		5,425			(170,722		)	408,376
Inventories	419,519			148,958		11,336			(10,496		)	569,317
Other current assets	28,041			877		263			(50		)	29,131
Total current assets	754,652			444,597		18,216			(181,268		)	1,036,197
Property, plant and equipment, net	947,745			181,999		7,076			(117		)	1,136,703
Other assets	164,955			114,612		398			(205,848		)	74,117
Total assets	$	1,867,352		$	741,208	$	25,690		$	(387,233	)	$	2,247,017

Accounts payable	$	142,593		$	37,952	$	4,490		$	(6,596	)	$	178,439
Accrued expenses	108,453			28,927		935			2,050			140,365
Current maturities of long-term debt	80,665			22		7,907			(7,908		)	80,686
Total current liabilities	331,711			66,901		13,332			(12,454		)	399,490
Other liabilities	(31,435		)	360,422		3,498			(75,682		)	256,803
Long-term debt	358,049			143		1,837			(1,837		)	358,192
Minority interest	(98		)	—		—			1,522			1,424

Common stock	537			10,745		7,946			(18,691		)	537
Treasury stock	(230,472		)	—		—			—			(230,472		)
Additional paid in capital	367,772			116,868		—			(116,868		)	367,772
Retained earnings	1,071,288			186,129		(923		)	(163,223		)	1,093,271
Total stockholders’ equity	1,209,125			313,742		7,023			(298,782		)	1,231,108
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,867,352		$	741,208	$	25,690		$	(387,233	)	$	2,247,017

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income

For the three months ended, March 31, 2007	Parent		Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantors			Consolidating Adjustments			Total Consolidated
Net sales	$	660,910	$	883,753		$	20,576		$	(699,565	)	$	865,674
Costs of goods sold	498,122		826,466			19,671			(694,988		)	649,271
Gross profit	162,788		57,287			905			(4,577		)	216,403
Selling, general and administrative	31,272		15,099			1,218			(2,497		)	45,092
Operating income (loss)	131,516		42,188			(313		)	(2,080		)	171,311
Interest expense	5,231		1,984			160			(129		)	7,246
Other (income) expense, net	46,684		(47,543		)	(16		)	160			(715		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income of subsidiaries	79,601		87,747			(457		)	(2,111		)	164,780
Income taxes	30,134		31,593			(39		)	928			62,616
	49,467		56,154			(418		)	(3,039		)	102,164
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	55,736		—			—			(55,736		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	105,203	$	56,154		$	(418	)	$	(58,775	)	$	102,164

For the three months ended, March 31, 2006	Parent		Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantors			Consolidating Adjustments			Total Consolidated
Net sales	$	632,968	$	673,875		$	20,291		$	(661,256	)	$	665,878
Costs of goods sold	483,577		660,031			18,643			(655,860		)	506,391
Gross profit	149,391		13,844			1,648			(5,396		)	159,487
Selling, general and administrative	23,342		6,638			877			(2,482		)	28,375
Operating income (loss)	126,049		7,206			771			(2,914		)	131,112
Interest expense	7,596		541			86			(87		)	8,136
Other (income) expense, net	38,167		(38,943		)	(22		)	117			(681		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income of subsidiaries	80,286		45,608			707			(2,944		)	123,657
Income taxes	32,578		16,430			288			(1,688		)	47,608
	47,708		29,178			419			(1,256		)	76,049
Equity in net income of subsidiaries	29,597		—			—			(29,597		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	77,305	$	29,178		$	419		$	(30,853	)	$	76,049

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow

For the three months ended, March 31, 2007	Parent			Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantors			Total Consolidated
Net cash provided by operations	$	67,369		$	80,887		$	179		$	148,435
Net cash used in investing activities	(36,527		)	(16,716		)	(909		)	(54,152		)
Net cash provided by (used in) in financing activities	(35,768		)	(60,107		)	551			(95,324		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents	(4,926		)	4,064			(179		)	(1,041		)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year	15,571			12,610			1,192			29,373
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	10,645		$	16,674		$	1,013		$	28,332

For the three months ended, March 31, 2006	Parent			Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantors			Total Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations	$	109,832		$	27,686		$	(73	)	$	137,445
Net cash used in investing activities	(18,544		)	(252		)	(489		)	(19,285		)
Net cash provided by (used in) in financing activities	38,769			(27,385		)	643			12,027
Increase in cash and equivalents	130,057			49			81			130,187
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year	62,842			132			2,544			65,518
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	192,899		$	181		$	2,625		$	195,705

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains some predictive statements about future events, including statements related to conditions in the steel marketplace, our revenue growth, costs of raw materials, future profitability and earnings, and the operation of new or existing facilities. These statements are intended to be made as “forward-looking,” subject to many risks and uncertainties, within the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such predictive statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results could differ materially from our current expectations. Factors that could cause such predictive statements to turn out other than as anticipated or predicted include, among others: changes in economic conditions affecting steel consumption; increased foreign imports; increased price competition; difficulties in integrating acquired businesses; risks and uncertainties involving new products or new technologies; changes in the availability or cost of steel scrap or substitute materials; increases in energy costs; occurrence of unanticipated equipment failures and plant outages; labor unrest; and the effect of the elements on production or consumption.

In addition, we refer you to the sections denominated Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statement and Risk Factors in our Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as well as, in other reports which we from time to time file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for a more detailed discussion of some of the many factors, variable risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those we may have expected or anticipated. These reports are available publicly on the SEC Web site, www.sec.gov, and on our web site, www.steeldynamics.com. Forward-looking or predictive statements we make are based on our knowledge of our businesses and the environment in which they operate as of the date on which the statements were made. Due to these risks and uncertainties, as well as matters beyond our control which can affect forward-looking statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these predictive statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Income Statement Classifications

Net Sales. Net sales from steel operations are a factor of net tons shipped, product mix and related pricing. Net sales from steel fabrication are recognized from construction contracts utilizing a percentage-of-completion method, which is based on the percentage of steel consumed to-date as compared to the estimated total steel required for each contract. Steel fabrication revenues accounted for approximately 9% and 6% of our total net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our net sales are determined by subtracting product returns, sales discounts, return allowances and claims from total sales. We charge premium prices for certain grades of steel, product dimensions, or certain smaller volumes, and for value-added processing or coating of steel products. We also charge marginally higher prices for our value-added products. These products include hot rolled and cold rolled galvanized products, cold rolled products, and painted products from our Flat Roll Division; certain special-bar-quality products from our Engineered Bar Products Division; and certain industrial truck and trailer products from our Steel of West Virginia operations.

Costs of Goods Sold. Our costs of goods sold represent all direct and indirect costs associated with the manufacture of our products. The principal elements of these costs are steel scrap and scrap substitutes, alloys, zinc, natural gas, argon, direct and indirect labor and related benefits, electricity, oxygen, electrodes, depreciation, materials and freight. Our metallic raw materials, steel scrap and scrap substitutes, represent the most significant component of our costs of goods sold.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A). Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of all costs associated with our sales, finance and accounting, and administrative departments. These costs include labor and benefits, professional services, financing cost amortization, property taxes, and profit-sharing expense.

Interest Expense. Interest expense consists of interest associated with our senior credit facilities and other debt (as described in the notes to our financial statements as set forth in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K) net of capitalized interest costs that are related to construction expenditures during the construction period of material capital projects.

Other (Income) Expense. Other income consists of interest income earned on our cash balances and any other non-operating income activity. Other expense consists of any non-operating costs.

Elizabethton Herb & Metal

We purchased the land, property, plant and equipment and inventory of Elizabethton Herb & Metal, Inc. (Elizabethton) on April 1, 2007. Elizabethton is comprised of two scrap processing yards located in Elizabethton and Johnson City, Tennessee. These two yards generally process in excess of 225,000 tons of ferrous scrap annually. Elizabethton supplied our Roanoke Bar Division with a portion of its steel scrap requirements before the purchase and will continue to do so. Beginning April 1, 2007, Elizabethton operations will be reflected in our steel scrap and steel scrap substitute operating segment.

Due to the fact that the Roanoke Electric merger was effective April 11, 2006, the results of these operations are not reflected in our first quarter 2006 results.

First Quarter Operating Results 2007 vs. 2006

Net income was $102.2 million or $1.01 per diluted share during the first quarter of 2007, compared with $76.0 million or $.76 per diluted share during the first quarter of 2006. Our gross margin percentage was 25% during the first quarter of 2007, as compared to 24% for the first quarter of 2006 and as compared to 27% on a linked-quarter basis. Our first quarter 2007 average consolidated selling price per ton shipped decreased $31 per ton when compared to the fourth quarter of 2006, and at the same time costs associated with our metallic raw materials on a comparative basis increased $15 per net ton consumed. These circumstances resulted in a decreased gross margin; however, the decrease in our operating profit per ton was somewhat offset by a reduction in our SG&A costs due to a special bonus that was paid to employees in the fourth quarter of 2006 and also due to cost compression experienced through increased production volumes in the first quarter.

Gross Profit. When comparing the first quarter of 2007 with the first quarter of 2006, our net sales increased $199.8 million, or 30%, to $865.7 million, while our consolidated shipments increased 200,000 tons, or 19%, to 1.3 million tons. The increase in shipments was due to increased shipments of 37,000 tons at our Structural and Rail Division, 17,000 tons at our Engineered Bar Products Division and to the inclusion of 245,000 tons from our two Roanoke Electric steelmaking divisions.

As depicted by the following graph, our first quarter 2007 average consolidated selling price per ton shipped increased $58 compared with the first quarter of 2006. During the first three months of 2007, the volume of steel products imported into the Unites States decreased for certain products. We believe import volumes could remain at lower levels in the short term as a result of stronger global demand; however, import activity is difficult to forecast. Continued strength within the non-residential construction market has resulted in sustained strong demand for structural steel and building fabrication products. Currently, we anticipate a modest increase in our second quarter average pricing; however, we believe this increase in pricing may be partially offset by an expected increase in our steel scrap costs consumed early in the second quarter, thus resulting in only a slight increase in our gross margin during the second quarter.

Generally, we incur higher production costs when manufacturing value-added products such as cold rolled, galvanized, and painted flat roll steels; and special-bar-quality steels. The following charts depict our steel and fabrication operations product-mix by major product category for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, based on tons shipped from these operations.

		2006		2007
Flat Rolled:	Hot Band	26	%	27	%
	Pickled & Oiled	4		5
	Cold Rolled	6		4
	Cold Rolled Galvanized	13		11
	Hot Rolled Galvanized	11		10
	Painted	5		5
Structural:	Wide Flange Beams, H-Piling and Specialty	20		21
Bar:	SBQ and Merchant Shapes	9		9
Fabrication:	Joists, Girders and Decking	3		4
Other		3		4
		100	%	100	%

Metallic raw materials used in our electric arc furnaces represent our most significant manufacturing cost. Our metallic raw material cost per net ton consumed increased $3 during the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 and increased $15 on a linked-quarter basis. During the first quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively, our metallic raw material costs represented 53% and 55% of our total manufacturing costs. Historically our metallic raw material costs represented between 45% and 50% of our total manufacturing costs; however, this percentage increased to as high as 65% in 2004, when the industry encountered historically high steel scrap prices. We anticipate our cost of steel scrap consumed to increase in the second quarter even though the cost to purchase scrap is expected to decline mid second quarter as we will be consuming scrap that was purchased at higher prices earlier in the year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $45.1 million during the first quarter of 2007, as compared to $28.4 million during the same period in 2006, an increase of $16.7 million, or 59%. During the first quarter of 2007 and 2006 our selling, general and administrative expenses represented 5% and 4% of our total net sales, respectively.

We recorded expense of $13.6 million and $7.9 million during the first quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to our Steel Dynamics performance-based profit sharing plan allocation, which is currently calculated as 8% of pretax earnings. Our board of directors approved an increase from 6% to the current 8% in the profit sharing rate effective August 1, 2006, in recognition of the additional plan participants added as a result of the April 2006 Roanoke Electric merger.

Interest Expense. During the first quarter of 2007, gross interest expense increased $239,000, or 3%, to $8.6 million and capitalized interest increased $1.1 million to $1.4 million, when compared to the same period in 2006. The interest capitalization that occurred during these periods resulted from the interest required to be capitalized with respect to construction activities at our Flat Roll and Structural and Rail divisions. We currently anticipate gross interest expense to remain consistent throughout the remainder of this year.

Other (Income) Expense. Other income was $715,000 during the first quarter of 2007, as compared to $681,000 during the same period in 2006. During 2007 and 2006, other income was principally composed of certain non-operating revenues recognized at several of the Roanoke Electric subsidiaries.

Income Taxes. During the first quarter of 2007, our income tax provision was $62.6 million, as compared to $47.6 million during the same period in 2006. Our effective income tax rate was 38.0% and 38.5% during the first quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively. We decreased our estimated annual effective tax rate to reflect, among other things, the recognition of research and development tax credits and the reduction in our expected state tax rate due to the Roanoke Electric merger.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined. FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations. As of January 1, 2007, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $24.0 million including accrued interest and penalties. There has been no significant change in the unrecognized tax benefits during the period ended March 31, 2007. If recognized, the effective tax rate would be affected by the unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties related to our tax contingencies on a net-of-tax basis in income tax expense. Our January 1, 2007 tax contingencies include $1.7 million of interest and penalties.

We file U.S. federal income tax returns as well as income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. We are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for calendar years 1997 through 2001 and we expect this audit to be completed by the end of 2007. We may be subject to examination by the IRS for calendar years 2003 through 2006. We are currently under examination by Indiana for calendar years 2000 through 2005. It is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits could change in the next 12 months as a result of these audits. Based on the current audits in process, the payment of taxes as a result of audit settlements could be from zero to $24.0 million during the next 12 months. For other major state tax jurisdictions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business is capital intensive and requires substantial expenditures for, among other things, the purchase and maintenance of equipment used in our steelmaking and finishing operations and to remain in compliance with environmental laws. Our short-term and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from capital expenditures, working capital requirements and principal and interest payments related to our outstanding indebtedness. We have met these liquidity requirements with cash provided by operations, equity offerings, long-term borrowings, and state and local grants.

Working Capital. During the first three months of 2007, our operational working capital position, representing our cash invested in trade receivables and inventories less trade payables and accruals decreased $16.4 million to $642.5 million compared to December 31, 2006. Trade receivables increased $13.6 million, or 3%, during the first three months of 2007 to $422.0 million, of which approximately 97%, were current or less than 60 days past due. Our largest customer is an affiliated company, Heidtman Steel, which represented 9% and 13% of our outstanding trade receivables at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. During the first three months of 2007 our inventories increased $56.9 million, or 10%, to $626.2 million. Raw materials, primarily steel scrap inventories, generally increased during the first three months of 2007 for all of our steelmaking divisions. Our trade payables and general accruals increased $70.4 million, or 30%, during the first three months of 2007.

Capital Expenditures. During the first three months of 2007, we invested $53.9 million in property, plant and equipment, of which $35.2 million, or 65%, related to the construction of a second rolling mill at our Structural and Rail Division; and the continued reconfiguration of the three joist plants acquired in April 2006. The remaining capital expenditures represented improvement projects at our other facilities. We believe these capital investments will increase our net sales and related cash flows as each project develops.

Capital Resources and Long—term Debt. During the first three months of 2007, our total outstanding debt, including unamortized bond premium, increased $14.5 million to $453.4 million. Our long-term debt to capitalization ratio, representing our long-term debt divided by the sum of our long-term debt and our total stockholders’ equity, was 27% and 26% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

At March 31, 2007, there were outstanding borrowings of $95 million under our $350 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The senior secured credit agreement is secured by substantially all of our and our wholly-owned subsidiaries receivables and inventories and by pledges of all shares of capital stock and inter-company debt held by us and each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. The senior secured credit agreement contains financial covenants and other covenants that limit or restrict our ability to make capital expenditures; incur indebtedness; permit liens on property; enter into transactions with affiliates; make restricted payments or investments; enter into mergers, acquisitions or consolidations; conduct asset sales; pay dividends or distributions and enter into other specified transactions and activities. Our ability to borrow funds within the terms of the revolver is dependent upon our continued compliance with the financial covenants and other covenants contained in the senior secured credit agreement. We were in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2007, and expect to remain in compliance during the next twelve months.

On April 3, 2007, we issued $500 million of 6¾% Senior Notes due 2015 (Notes). The net proceeds from the Notes were used to redeem our existing $300 million 9½% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2009 (9½% Notes) at a redemption price of 102.375% on May 3, 2007, to repay amounts outstanding under our senior secured revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes, including funding of capital expenditures. In connection with the redemption of the 9½% Notes, we also terminated our underlying $200 million fair-value interest rate swap at an after-tax cost of $2.8 million, which will be recognized as a loss on hedging transactions during the second quarter of 2007. In addition, we expect to record additional after-tax expense during the second quarter of approximately $4.2 million related to the redemption premium, the recognition of the remaining unamortized bond premium, the write-off of previously capitalized financing costs, and the additional interest expense incurred while the 9½% Notes remained outstanding during the 30-day redemption-notice period.

Common Stock Purchases. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we purchased 2.8 million shares of our common stock in open market trades at an average purchase price of $37.37. These purchases were made pursuant to programs authorized by our board of directors and as of March 31, 2007, 2.8 million shares remain authorized and available for purchase.

Cash Dividends. During the first quarter of 2007, our board of directors approved a $.10 per common share regular quarterly cash dividend and the continuation of a special dividend of $.05 per common share to be distributed in addition to the company’s regular quarterly cash dividend. The combined $.15 per common share dividend was payable to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2007 and was paid on April 13, 2007. We anticipate continuing comparable quarterly cash dividends throughout 2007. The determination to pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors, after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, outstanding indebtedness, current and anticipated cash needs and growth plans. In addition, the terms of our senior secured revolving credit agreement and the indenture relating to our senior notes restrict the amount of cash dividends we can pay.

Other. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and reduce our total debt will depend upon our future performance which, in turn, will depend upon general economic, financial and business conditions, along with competition, legislation and regulatory factors that are largely beyond our control. In addition, we cannot assure you that our operating results, cash flow and capital resources will be sufficient for repayment of our indebtedness in the future. We believe that based upon current levels of operations and anticipated growth, cash flow from operations, together with other available sources of funds, including additional borrowings under our senior secured credit agreement, will be adequate for the next two years for making required payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, funding working capital requirements and funding anticipated capital expenditures.

Other Matters

Inflation. We believe that inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.

Environmental and Other Contingencies. We have incurred, and in the future will continue to incur, capital expenditures and operating expenses for matters relating to environmental control, remediation, monitoring and compliance. We believe, apart from our dependence on environmental construction and operating permits for our existing and proposed manufacturing facilities, that compliance with current environmental laws and regulations is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity; however, environmental laws and regulations are subject to change, and we may become subject to more stringent environmental laws and regulations in the future.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk. In the normal course of business we are exposed to interest rate changes. Our objectives in managing exposure to interest rate changes are to limit the impact of these rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest rate changes related to our borrowings. We generally maintain fixed rate debt as a percentage of our net debt between a minimum and maximum percentage. A portion of our debt has an interest component that resets on a periodic basis to reflect current market conditions. At March 31, 2007, no material changes had occurred related to our interest rate risk from the information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

On April 3, 2007, we issued $500 million of 6¾% Senior Notes due 2015 (Notes). A portion of the net proceeds from the Notes were used to redeem our existing $300 million 9½% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2009 (9½% Notes) at a redemption price of 102.375% on May 3, 2007. In connection with the redemption of the 9½% Notes, we also terminated our underlying $200 million fair-value interest rate swap at an after-tax cost of $2.8 million, which will be recognized as a loss on hedging transactions during the second quarter of 2007.

Commodity Risk. In the normal course of business we are exposed to the market risk and price fluctuations related to the sale of steel products and to the purchase of commodities used in our production process, such as metallic raw materials, electricity, natural gas and alloys. Our risk strategy associated with product sales has generally been to obtain competitive prices for our products and to allow operating results to reflect market price movements dictated by supply and demand. Our risk strategy associated with the purchase of commodities utilized within our production process has generally been to make certain commitments with suppliers relating to future expected requirements for such commodities. Certain of these commitments contain provisions which require us to “take or pay” for specified quantities without regard to actual usage for periods of up to two years for physical commodity requirements and for up to 15 years for commodity transportation requirements.. Historically, we have fully utilized all such “take or pay” requirements and we believe that our future production requirements will be such that consumption of the products or services purchased under these commitments will occur in the normal production process. At March 31, 2007, no material changes had occurred related to these commodity risks from the information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as we use that term and as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to our management, including our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

There are no material pending legal proceedings required to be described in this report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Our profitability is subject to the risks described under this section on Risk Factors described below. Although the following are not necessarily the only ones facing our company, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of the following risks:.

Risks Related to Our Industry

In recent years, imports of steel into the United States have adversely affected, and may yet again adversely affect, U.S. steel prices, which would impact our sales, margins and profitability.

Excessive imports of steel into the United States as a result of excess world supply, have in recent years exerted, and may again in the future exert downward pressure on U.S. steel prices and significantly reduce our sales, margins and profitability. U.S. steel producers compete with many foreign producers. Competition from foreign producers is typically strong, is periodically exacerbated by weakening of the economies of certain foreign steelmaking countries, and is further intensified during periods when the U.S. dollar is strong relative to foreign currencies. Greater steel exports to the United States tend to occur at depressed prices when steel producing countries experience periods of economic difficulty, decreased demand for steel products or excess capacity.

In addition, we believe the downward pressure on, and periodically depressed levels of U.S. steel prices in some recent years have been further exacerbated by imports of steel involving dumping and subsidy abuses by foreign steel producers. Some foreign steel producers are owned, controlled or subsidized by foreign governments. As a result, decisions by these producers with respect to their production, sales and pricing are often influenced to a greater degree by political and economic policy considerations than by prevailing market conditions, realities of the marketplace or consideration of profit or loss. However, while some tariffs and quotas are currently in effect for certain steel products imported from a number of countries that have been found to have been unfairly pricing steel imports to the U.S. The International Trade Commission in December 2006, for example, as part of its five year review cycle of various steel import duties, voted to revoke all tariffs and countervailing duties on carbon steel plate from 16 countries, and voted to end tariffs on corrosion resistant galvanized steel sheet imported from Canada, France, Australia and Japan. When such tariffs or duties expire or if others are further relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. steel prices enable foreign steelmakers to export their steel products to the United States, even despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel could again create downward pressure on U.S. steel prices.

China’s current steelmaking overcapacity coupled with a reduction or slowdown in China’s steel consumption could have a material adverse effect on domestic and global steel pricing and could result in increased steel exports into the United States.

A significant factor in the worldwide strengthening of steel pricing over the past several years has been the explosive growth in Chinese steel consumption, which had until recently vastly outpaced that country’s capacity to produce steel in sufficient quantity to serve its internal demand, particularly during 2004. The shortage of Chinese domestic steel supply resulted not only in heightened Chinese demand for imported steel and other raw materials, with a consequent upward spiral in worldwide steel pricing, but also led to a rapid and significant expansion of steel production capacity in China. That, in addition to the existence of a large amount of outdated, inefficient and government subsidized production capacity, has resulted in a situation in which China’s steel producing capacity currently exceeds that country’s demand for certain steel products. A combination of a slowdown in China’s economic growth rate and its consumption of steel, coupled with its own expansion of steelmaking capacity, has caused a reduction in and could result in a substantial weakening of both domestic and global steel demand and steel pricing. Should Chinese steelmaking capacity further increase or its demand weaken, China might not only become a net exporter of steel but many Asian and European steel producers whose steel output currently feeds China’s steel import needs could find their way into the U.S. market, through increased steel imports, thus causing an erosion of margins and a reduction in pricing. In fact, in February 2007, the United States initiated legal action against China before the World Trade Organization, alleging that Chinese government subsidies and tax laws give Chinese steel mills and unfair advantage, and the European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries is preparing to petition the European Union Commission to take anti-dumping action against Chinese imports.

Increases in prices and limited availability of raw materials and energy may constrain operation levels and reduce profit margins.

Steel producers require large amounts of raw materials such as scrap. Steel producers also consume large amounts of energy. Over the last several years, prices for raw materials and energy have increased significantly, in many cases by a greater margin than corresponding price increases for the sale of steel products. Depending upon applicable raw material and energy prices, over which we may have little control, we and other steel producers may be faced in the future with difficulty in obtaining sufficient raw materials and energy in a timely manner or for reasonable costs, resulting in potential production curtailments.

Our level of production and our sales and earnings are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of the cyclical nature of the steel industry and the industries we serve, particularly the auto industry.

The price of steel may fluctuate significantly due to many factors beyond our control. This fluctuation directly affects our product mix, production volumes and our sales and earnings. The steel industry is highly cyclical and the sale of our products is directly affected by demand for our products in other highly cyclical industries, such as the automotive, oil and gas, gas transmission, residential and commercial/industrial construction, commercial equipment, rail transportation, appliance, agricultural and durable goods industries. Currently, the domestic automotive industry, which is a major consumer of new steel and a major generator of steel scrap, is suffering from a substantial downturn, and continued economic difficulties, stagnant economies, supply/demand imbalances and currency fluctuations in the United States or globally could further decrease the demand for our products or increase the amount of imports of steel into the United States, which would decrease our sales, margins and profitability. We are also particularly sensitive to trends and events, including strikes and labor unrest that may adversely impact these industries. These industries are significant markets for our products and are themselves highly cyclical.

Risks Relating to our Business

We may encounter supply shortages and increases in the cost of raw materials, energy and transportation.

Steel production requires substantial amounts of raw materials and energy, including steel scrap, pig iron, iron ore fines, natural gas, coal and other alloys or materials used in the process of making steel. Any prolonged interruption in the supply of raw materials or energy, or substantial increases in their costs, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. The [availability and] prices of raw materials have substantially increased over the past several years and may also continue to increase. The availability and prices of raw materials may be negatively affected by new laws or regulations, allocation by suppliers, interruptions in production, accidents or natural disasters, changes in exchange rates, worldwide price fluctuations, and the availability and cost of transportation.

Energy costs, including the cost of natural gas and electricity, make up a substantial portion of the cost of goods sold by steel companies, and the price of natural gas and electricity varies as a result of market conditions and other factors beyond the control of steel companies. Moreover, global developments, particularly the dramatic increase in the demand for raw materials, including scrap, and other inputs used in steel manufacturing from China and other Asian countries, have in the past caused shortages and may continue to cause severe shortages and/or substantial price increases in key raw materials, as well as in ocean transportation capacity and costs. Inability to recoup such cost increases from increases in the selling prices of steel products, or the inability to pass on all or any substantial part of such cost increases through scrap or other surcharges, or the inability to provide customers’ needs because of the potential unavailability of key raw materials or other inputs, may have a material adverse effect on Steel Dynamics’ business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Our senior secured credit agreement contains, and any future financing agreements may contain, restrictive covenants that may limit our flexibility.

Restrictions and covenants in our existing debt agreements, including our senior secured credit agreement and any future financing agreements, may impair our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. Specifically, these agreements restrict our ability to:

· incur additional indebtedness;

· pay dividends or make distributions with respect to our capital stock;

· repurchase or redeem capital stock;

· make some investments;

· create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

· make some capital expenditures;

· enter into transactions with affiliates or related persons;

· issue or sell stock of certain subsidiaries;

· sell or transfer assets; and

· participate in some joint ventures, acquisitions or mergers.

A breach of any of the restrictions or covenants could cause a default under our senior secured credit agreement, other debt or certain of our notes. A significant portion of our indebtedness then may become immediately due and payable.

We may face significant price and other forms of competition from other steel producers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation or prospects.

The global markets in which steel companies conduct business are highly competitive and are becoming even more so due to increasing consolidation in the steel industry. Increased competition could cause us to lose market share, increase expenditures or reduce pricing, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. The global steel industry has historically suffered from substantial over-capacity, and excess capacity in some of our products will intensify price competition for such products. This could cause us to reduce the price for our products and, as a result, have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. We compete primarily on the basis of quality and the ability to meet our customers’ product needs, delivery schedules and price, and some of our competitors may have advantages due to greater capital resources, different technologies, lower raw material and energy costs or favorable exchange rates.

We may be unable to pass on increases in the cost of scrap and other raw materials to our customers which would reduce our earnings.

If we are unable to pass on higher scrap and other raw material costs to our customers we will be less profitable. We may not be able to adjust our product prices, especially in the short-term, to recover the costs of increases in scrap and other raw material prices. Our principal raw material is scrap metal derived primarily from junked automobiles, industrial scrap, railroad cars, railroad track materials, agricultural machinery and demolition scrap from obsolete structures, containers and machines. The prices for scrap are subject to market forces largely beyond our control, including demand by U.S. and international steel producers, freight costs and speculation. The prices for scrap have varied significantly, may vary significantly in the future and do not necessarily fluctuate in tandem with the price of steel. Moreover, some of our integrated steel producer competitors are not as dependant as we are on scrap as a part of their raw material melt mix, which, during periods of high scrap costs relative to the cost of blast furnace iron used by the integrated producers, give them a raw material cost advantage over mini-mills. In addition, our operations require substantial amounts of other raw materials, including various types of pig iron, alloys, refractories, oxygen, natural gas and electricity, the price and availability of which are also subject to market conditions.

Competition from other materials may have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

In many applications, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum and plastics (particularly in the automobile industry), cement, composites, glass and wood. Additional substitutes for steel products could adversely affect future market prices and demand for steel products.

Equipment downtime or shutdowns could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Steel manufacturing processes are dependent on critical steelmaking equipment, such as furnaces, continuous casters, rolling mills and electrical equipment (such as transformers), and this equipment may incur downtime as a result of unanticipated failures or other events, such as fires or furnace breakdowns, as well as other unusual and unplanned maintenance requirements. Our manufacturing plants have experienced, and may in the future experience plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of such equipment failures or other events. These disruptions could have an adverse affect on our operations, customer service levels and financial results.

We may face risks associated with the implementation of our growth strategy.

Our growth strategy subjects us to various risks. As part of our growth strategy, we may expand existing facilities, build additional plants, acquire other businesses and steel assets, enter into joint ventures, or form strategic alliances that we believe will complement our existing business. These transactions will likely involve some or all of the following risks:

· the difficulty of competing for acquisitions and other growth opportunities with companies having materially greater financial resources than us;

· the difficulty of integrating the acquired operations and personnel into existing businesses;

· the potential disruption of ongoing businesses;

· the diversion of resources;

· the inability of management to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

· the difficulty of managing the growth of a larger company;

· the risk of entering markets in which we have little experience;

· the risk of becoming involved in labor, commercial, or regulatory disputes or litigation related to the new enterprise;

· the risk of contractual or operational liability to other venture participants or to third parties as a result of our participation;

· the inability to work efficiently with joint venture or strategic alliance partners; and

· the difficulties of terminating joint ventures or strategic alliances.

These transactions might be required for us to remain competitive, but we may not be able to complete any such transactions on favorable terms or obtain financing, if necessary, for such transactions on favorable terms. Future transactions may not improve our competitive position and business prospects as anticipated, and if they do not our sales and earnings may be significantly reduced.

There are risks associated with acquisitions.

The success of any future acquisition will depend substantially on our ability to integrate the acquired operations successfully with our existing operations in an efficient and effective manner. If we are unable to integrate new operations successfully, our financial results could suffer. Additional risks associated with acquisitions include the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, the potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired companies, the potential assumption of unknown liabilities, and the inherent risks in entering markets or lines of business in which we have limited or no prior experience. [Status of Roanoke?]

Environmental regulation imposes substantial costs and limitations on our operations.

We are subject to the risk of substantial environmental liability and limitations on our operations brought about by the requirements of environmental laws and regulations. We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning such issues as air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous materials and waste handling and disposal, and the investigation and remediation of contamination. These laws and regulations are increasingly stringent. While we believe that our facilities are and will continue to be in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, the risks of substantial costs and liabilities related to compliance with these laws and regulations are an inherent part of the business, and it is possible that future conditions may develop, arise or be discovered that create substantial environmental remediation liabilities and costs. For example, steelmaking operations produce some waste products, such as electric arc furnace dust, which are classified as hazardous waste and must be properly disposed of under applicable environmental laws. These laws can impose clean up liability on generators of hazardous waste and other substances that are shipped off-site for disposal, regardless of fault or the legality of the disposal activities. Other laws may require us to investigate and remediate contamination at its properties, including contamination that was caused in whole or in part by third parties. While we believe we can comply with environmental legislation and regulatory requirements and that the costs of doing so have been included within budgeted cost estimates, it is possible that such compliance will prove to be more limiting and costly than anticipated. In addition to potential clean up liability, in the past we have been, and in the future may become, subject to substantial monetary fines and penalties for violation of applicable laws, regulations or administrative conditions. We may also be subject from time to time to legal proceedings brought by private parties or governmental agencies with respect to environmental matters, including matters involving alleged property damage or personal injury.

Technology, operating and start-up risks associated with our contemplated Mesabi Nugget project may prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits and could result in a loss of our investment.

While we and certain other joint venture partners built and operated a successful small scale pilot project in Minnesota using Kobe Steel’s proprietary ITmK3’s iron-making process to produce a cost effective iron nugget product, we have no assurance that the full scale commercial plant we are now contemplating, in which we would likely be the dominant investor and owner, will be successful. Although, we believe that a full scale commercial plant should be capable of consistently producing high-quality iron nuggets in sufficient quantities and at a cost that will compare favorably with the cost of scrap and scrap substitute products, including pig iron, there can be no assurance that these expectations can be achieved. If we proceed with this project, which could entail an investment in excess of [$200] million, and if we thereafter encounter cost overruns, construction delays or systems or process difficulties during or after start-up, the anticipated capital costs could materially increase, the expected operating cost benefits from the development of this iron nugget product could be diminished or lost, and we could also lose our investment in the project.

Risks Related to ownership of our common stock

Our stock price may be volatile and could decline substantially.

Our stock price may decline substantially as a result of the volatile nature of the stock market and other factors beyond its control. Many factors may cause the market price of our common stock to decline, including:

· the failure of operating results to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors in any quarter;

· downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates;

· consolidation by other competitors in the industry;

· material company or industry announcements by us or our competitors;

· market perceptions concerning the steel cycle and our future earnings prospects;

· public sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock;

· governmental regulatory action; or

· adverse changes in general market conditions or economic trends.

We may not continue to pay cash dividends in the future

From the time of our initial public offering in 1996, through the second quarter of 2004, we did not declare or pay cash or other dividends on our common stock. We declared and paid aggregate cash dividends of $.125 (twelve and one-half cents) per share and $.20 (twenty cents) per share for 2004 and 2005, respectively. We declared and paid cash dividends of $.10 (ten cents) per share for each of the first and second quarters of 2006 and $.15 (fifteen cents) per share for each of the third and fourth quarters of 2006. We cannot assure you that we will continue to pay cash dividends, or, if we do, that we will do so at the current rate. We may elect at any time to retain all future earnings for use in the operation of our business and to fund future growth. Moreover, the terms of our senior secured credit agreement and the indenture relating to our senior notes impose specified restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends. Even if these restrictions are removed, any future cash dividends will depend our results of operations, financial conditions, cash requirements, the availability of a surplus and other factors.

Risks Related to our 6¾% Senior Notes due 2015 (Notes)

We may not have sufficient cash flow to make payments on the Notes and our other debt.

Our ability to pay principal and interest on the Notes and our other debt and to fund our planned capital expenditures depends on our future operating performance. Our future operating performance is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are often beyond our control, including general economic conditions and financial, competitive, regulatory and environmental factors. For a discussion of some of these risks and uncertainties, please see Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and —Risks Related to Our Industry. Consequently, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient cash flow to meet our liquidity needs, including making payments on our indebtedness.

If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to allow us to make scheduled payments on the Notes or our other debt, we may have to sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our debt. We cannot assure you that the terms of our debt will allow for these alternative measures or that such measures would satisfy our scheduled debt service obligations.

If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt:

· our debtholders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable;

· the lenders under our senior secured credit agreement could terminate their commitments and commence foreclosure proceedings against our assets;

· we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation; and

· you could lose all or part of your investment in the Notes.

The rights of the holders of our Notes to receive payments on the Notes are effectively subordinated to the rights of our and the guarantors’ existing and future secured creditors. Further, the rights of the holders of our Notes to receive payments on the Notes is effectively subordinated to all our non-guarantor subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness.

Our obligations under the Notes are unsecured. Holders of our secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under our senior secured credit agreement, and the secured indebtedness of the guarantors will have claims that are before any claims which the holders of the Notes may have to the extent of the value of the assets securing that other indebtedness. In the event of any distribution or payment of our assets in any foreclosure, dissolution, winding up, liquidation, reorganization, or other bankruptcy proceeding, holders of our secured indebtedness will have a prior claim to those of our assets that constitute their collateral. Holders of the Notes will participate ratably with all holders of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same class as the Notes, and potentially with all of our other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor, in our remaining assets. In any of the foregoing events, we cannot assure the holders of our Notes or others that there will be sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the Notes. As a result, holders of the Notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of secured indebtedness.

Additionally, some but not all of our subsidiaries will guarantee the Notes. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of our non-guarantor subsidiaries, holders of their indebtedness and their trade creditors will generally be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of those subsidiaries before any assets are made available for distribution to us.

Despite our level of indebtedness, we may still incur significantly more debt, which could further increase the risks described above.

The terms of our senior secured credit agreement limit but do not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the Notes do not limit our ability to incur unsecured indebtedness. If new indebtedness is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify, and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations, including repayment of the Notes, in whole or in part. Subject to certain limitations, any additional debt could also be secured or incurred by our non-guarantor subsidiaries which could increase the risks described above.

We may be prohibited from repurchasing, and may be unable to repurchase, the Notes upon a change of control, which would cause defaults under the indenture for the Notes or possibly any of our debt or financing agreements that may be in effect at the time of the change in control.

If we experience a change of control, as that term is defined in the indenture governing the Notes, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase all of the Notes at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. We cannot assure the holders of our Notes and others that we will have sufficient funds or be able to arrange for additional financing to repurchase the Notes following such a change of control. In addition, we can not assure the holders of our Notes and others that a repurchase of the Notes following such a change in control would be permitted pursuant to any of our debt or financing agreements that would be in effect at the time of such change in control, which would cause our other indebtedness to be accelerated. If such debt were to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to repurchase the Notes and repay the debt.

Fraudulent conveyance laws could void the guarantees of the Notes.

Under U.S. bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, a guarantee could be voided, or claims in respect of a guarantee could be subordinated to all other debts of that guarantor if, among other things, the guarantor, at the time it incurred the indebtedness evidenced by its guarantee either (i) intended to hinder, delay or defraud any present or future creditor; or (ii) received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the incurrence of the guarantee and (a) was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of the incurrence of the guarantee; (b) was engaged in a business or transaction for which the guarantor’s remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or (c) intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. Moreover, any payments made by a guarantor pursuant to its guarantee could be voided and required to be returned to the guarantor, or to a fund for the benefit of the of the creditors of the subsidiary guarantor. To the extent that any guarantee is voided as a fraudulent conveyance, the claims of holders of the Notes with respect to such guarantee would be materially adversely affected.

In addition, a legal challenge of a guarantee on fraudulent conveyance grounds will focus on, among other things, the benefits, if any, realized by the relevant guarantor as a result of the issuance of the Notes. The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent transfer laws will vary depending upon the governing law. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if:

· the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, were greater than the fair saleable value of all of its assets; or

· if the present fair saleable value of its assets were less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or

· it could not pay its debts as they become due.

On the basis of historical financial information, recent operating history and other factors, we believe that the guarantees are being incurred for proper purposes and in good faith and that each guarantor, after giving effect to its guarantee of the Notes, will not be insolvent, will not have unreasonably small capital for the business in which it is engaged and will not have incurred debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. There can be no assurance, however, as to what standard a court would apply in making such determinations or that a court would agree with our conclusions in this regard.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table indicates shares repurchased pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the three months ended March 31, 2007.

					Total Share Still
					Available For
Period	Total Shares	Average Price		Total Program	Purchase
2007	Purchased	Paid Per Share		Shares Purchased	Under the Program
January 3 to 24	110,000	$	32.61	110,000	5,490,000
February 9 to 28	225,000	37.73		225,000	5,265,000
March 1 to 14	2,417,944	37.56		2,417,944	2,847,056

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1* Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2* Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1* Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2* Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

* Filed concurrently herewith.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

May 7, 2007

			STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.


		By:	/s/ Theresa E. Wagler
			Theresa E. Wagler
			Chief Financial Officer