Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

For the transition period from              to          

Commission file number 1-14762

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee · 38120

(Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)

901-597-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  o  No x

On July 24, 2007, the registrant completed a transaction pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 18, 2007, among the registrant and two corporations formed to effect the merger transactions. As a result of the merger transaction, the registrant became a privately held corporation and its equity shares are no longer publicly traded. At November 7, 2008, 1,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding, all of which were owned by CDRSVM Holding, Inc.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY (Registrant) -

2

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The ServiceMaster Company and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as the “Company” or “ServiceMaster”.

On March 18, 2007, ServiceMaster entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. (formerly CDRSVM Topco, Inc.) (“Holdings”) and CDRSVM Acquisition Co., Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Acquisition Co.”). The Merger Agreement provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Acquisition Co. would merge with and into ServiceMaster, with ServiceMaster as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”).

On July 24, 2007 (the “Closing Date”), the Merger was completed, and each issued and outstanding share of ServiceMaster common stock, other than shares held by ServiceMaster or Holdings or their subsidiaries and shares held by stockholders who validly perfected their appraisal rights under Delaware law, was converted into the right to receive $15.625 in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). Each share of ServiceMaster common stock owned by ServiceMaster, Holdings or Acquisition Co. or any of their respective direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries was cancelled and retired, and no consideration was paid in exchange for it.

Although ServiceMaster continued as the same legal entity after the Merger, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented for two periods, Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the period preceding the Merger and the period succeeding the Merger, respectively. The Company refers to the operations of ServiceMaster for both the Predecessor and Successor periods. The condensed consolidated statements of financial position as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the condensed consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and for the period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 reflect the financial position, operations and cash flows of the Successor. The condensed consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for the period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 reflect the operations and cash flows of the Predecessor.

As a result of the consummation of the Merger and the application of purchase accounting described in Note 3, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the Predecessor and Successor are not comparable.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company recommends that the quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“2007 Annual Report”). The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial results as well as the assets and liabilities related to InStar have been classified in the financial statement caption “discontinued operations” in all periods due to the classification of InStar as held for sale in 2007. The Company completed the sale of InStar in the third quarter of 2008. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results which might be achieved for a full year.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

The Company has identified the most important accounting policies with respect to its financial position and results of operations. These relate primarily to revenue recognition and the deferral of customer acquisition costs. The following revenue recognition policies have not changed from those disclosed in the 2007 Annual Report.

Revenues from lawn care and pest control services, as well as liquid and fumigation termite applications, are recognized as the services are provided. Revenues from landscaping services are recognized as they are earned based upon contract arrangements or when services are performed for non-contractual arrangements. The Company eradicates termites through the use of baiting systems, as well as through non-baiting methods (e.g., fumigation or liquid treatments). Termite

7

Table of Contents

services using baiting systems, termite inspection and protection contracts, and home warranty services are frequently sold through annual contracts for a one-time, upfront payment. Direct costs of these contracts (service costs for termite contracts and claim costs for warranty contracts) are expensed as incurred. The Company recognizes revenue over the life of these contracts in proportion to the expected direct costs. Those costs bear a direct relationship to the fulfillment of the Company’s obligations under the contracts and are representative of the relative value provided to the customer (proportional performance method). Home warranty contract revenue is recognized based on the expected emergence of total claim costs. The Company regularly reviews its estimates of direct costs for its termite bait and home warranty contracts and adjusts the estimates when appropriate. Revenue from trade name licensing arrangements is recognized when earned. The Company has franchise agreements in its TruGreen LawnCare, Terminix, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, AmeriSpec and Furniture Medic businesses. Franchise revenue (which in the aggregate represents approximately four percent of consolidated revenue from continuing operations) consists principally of continuing monthly fees based upon the franchisee’s customer level revenue. Monthly fee revenue is recognized when the related customer level revenue is reported by the franchisee and collectibility is assured. Franchise revenue also includes initial fees resulting from the sale of a franchise. These fees are fixed and are recognized as revenue when collectibility is assured and all material services or conditions relating to the sale have been substantially performed. Total profits from the franchised operations (excluding trade name licensing) were approximately $15.6 million, $9.0 million and $4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively, and consolidated operating income from continuing operations was approximately $110.7 million, $50.6 million and ($15.2) million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively. Total profits from the franchised operations (excluding trade name licensing) were approximately $47.3 million, $9.0 million and $31.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively, and consolidated operating income from continuing operations was approximately $214.5 million, $50.6 million and $143.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively. The portion of total franchise fee income related to initial fees received from the sale of franchises was immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for all periods.

The Company had $447 million and $408 million of deferred revenue at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Deferred revenue consists primarily of payments received for annual contracts relating to home warranty, termite, pest control and lawn care services.

Customer acquisition costs, which are incremental and direct costs of obtaining a customer, are deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in proportion to revenue recognized. These costs include sales commissions and direct selling costs which can be shown to have resulted in a successful sale.

TruGreen LawnCare has significant seasonality in its business. In the winter and spring, this business sells a series of lawn applications to customers which are rendered primarily in March through October (the production season). This business incurs incremental selling expenses at the beginning of the year that directly relate to successful sales for which the revenues are recognized in later quarters. On an interim basis, TruGreen LawnCare defers these incremental selling expenses, pre-season advertising costs and annual repairs and maintenance procedures that are performed primarily in the first quarter. These costs are deferred and recognized in proportion to the contract revenue over the production season, and are not deferred beyond the calendar year-end. Other business segments of the Company also defer, on an interim basis, advertising costs incurred early in the year. These costs are deferred and recognized approximately in proportion to revenue over the balance of the year and are not deferred beyond the calendar year-end.

The cost of direct-response advertising at Terminix and TruGreen LawnCare, consisting primarily of direct-mail promotions, is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefits.

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value estimates presented in this report are based on information available to the Company as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions required under GAAP which may differ from actual results. Disclosures in the 2007 Annual Report presented the significant areas that require the use of management’s estimates and discussed how management formed its judgments. The areas discussed included revenue recognition; the allowance for uncollectible receivables; accruals for self-insured retention limits related to medical, workers’ compensation, auto and general liability insurance claims; accruals for

8

Table of Contents

home warranty and termite damage claims; the possible outcome of outstanding litigation; accruals for income tax liabilities as well as deferred tax accounts; the deferral and amortization of customer acquisition costs; useful lives for depreciation and amortization expense; and the valuation of tangible and intangible assets.

Note 3. Acquisition of ServiceMaster

As discussed in Note 1, the Merger was completed on July 24, 2007.

Immediately following the completion of the Merger, all of the outstanding capital stock of Holdings, the ultimate parent company of ServiceMaster, was owned by investment funds sponsored by, or affiliates of, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (“CD&R”), Citigroup Private Equity L.P., BAS Capital Funding Corporation and J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation (collectively, the “Equity Sponsors”).

Equity contributions totaling $1,431 million from the Equity Sponsors, together with (i) borrowings under a new $1,150 million senior unsecured interim loan facility (“Interim Loan Facility”), (ii) borrowings under a new $2,650 million senior secured term loan facility and (iii) cash on hand at ServiceMaster, were used, among other things, to finance the aggregate Merger Consideration, to make payments in satisfaction of other equity-based interests in ServiceMaster under the Merger Agreement, to settle existing interest rate swaps, to redeem or provide for the repayment of certain of the Company’s existing indebtedness and to pay related transaction fees and expenses. In addition, letters of credit issued under a new $150 million pre-funded letter of credit facility (together with the senior secured term loan facility, the “Term Facilities”) were used to replace and/or secure letters of credit previously issued under a ServiceMaster credit facility that was terminated as of the Closing Date. On the Closing Date, the Company also entered into, but did not draw under, a new $500 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”).

In connection with the Merger and the related transactions (the “Transactions”), ServiceMaster retired certain of its existing indebtedness, including ServiceMaster’s $179.0 million, 7.875% notes due August 15, 2009 (the “2009 Notes”). On the Closing Date, the 2009 Notes were called for redemption and they were redeemed on August 29, 2007. Additionally, the Company utilized a portion of the proceeds from the Term Facilities to repay at maturity ServiceMaster’s $49.2 million, 6.95% notes due August 15, 2007.

The Interim Loan Facility matured on July 24, 2008. On the maturity date, outstanding amounts under the Interim Loan Facility were converted on a one to one basis into 10.75%/11.50% senior toggle notes maturing in 2015 (“Permanent Notes”). The Permanent Notes were issued pursuant to a refinancing indenture. In connection with the issuance of Permanent Notes, ServiceMaster entered into a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which ServiceMaster filed with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the resale of the Permanent Notes on October 22, 2008.

See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Annual Report for a description of the Company’s indebtedness.

The Company accounted for the Merger in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, which requires the cost of the Merger to be allocated to the assets and liabilities of the Company based on fair value. The Merger and the allocation of the purchase price have been recorded as of July 25, 2007.

The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The Company recorded purchase accounting adjustments to increase the carrying value of property, to establish intangible assets for trade names, service marks and trademarks (“trade names”), customer relationships, franchise agreements, backlog and lease commitments, among other things, as well as to reduce to fair value deferred revenue and deferred customer acquisition costs.

9

Table of Contents

The final allocation of the purchase price is as follows:

Goodwill and most trade names are indefinite-lived intangible assets. As a result, goodwill and indefinite-lived trade names will not be amortized but will be evaluated for impairment at least annually.

The Company incurred certain costs related to the Merger that are presented as “Merger related charges” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and are recorded in the Other Operations and Headquarters business segment.

Note 4. Restructuring Charges

The Company is engaged in a reorganization and restructuring of certain of its businesses and support functions (“Fast Forward”). Among the purposes of Fast Forward is to eliminate layers and bureaucracy and simplify work processes in order to better align the Company’s work processes around its operational and strategic objectives. It is expected that Fast Forward will be effected in phases. The first phase involved, among other things, a reduction in work force and various process improvements, including the closing of American Home Shield’s call center located in Santa Rosa, California. The second phase is expected to include the organization of certain corporate support functions into Centers of Excellence which are expected to deliver higher quality services to our business units at lower costs, the outsourcing to third party vendors of various business activities that currently are handled internally, as well as other employee workforce reductions expected to result in cost-savings. The first phase of Fast Forward was substantially completed in the first quarter of 2008, and the second phase is under way.

In connection with Fast Forward, the Company incurred costs in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $2.0 million and $8.7 million, respectively. Such costs included consulting fees of approximately $0.6 million and severance, lease termination and other costs of approximately $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. These charges included consulting fees of approximately $4.4 million and severance, lease termination and other costs of approximately $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007, the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, the Company incurred $3.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million of restructuring charges related to Fast Forward, respectively.

The results for the Successor Period ended September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period ended July 24, 2007 include restructuring charges related to the Company’s consolidation of its corporate headquarters into its operations support center in Memphis, Tennessee and the closing of its headquarters in Downers Grove, Illinois. The transition to Memphis was substantially completed in 2007. Almost all costs related to the transition were cash expenditures, and, in accordance with GAAP, these costs were expensed throughout the transition period. In the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007, the Company recognized charges of approximately $4.7 million, which consisted of $3.7 million of employee retention and severance and $1.0 million of recruiting and related costs. In the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, the Company recognized charges of approximately $1.5 million, which consisted of $1.0 million of employee retention and severance and $0.5 million of recruiting and related costs. In the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, the Company recognized charges of approximately $16.8 million, which consisted of $12.8 million of employee retention and severance and $4.0 million of recruiting and related costs. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company reversed net expenses of $0.2 million and recorded additional expense of $0.4 million, respectively, relating to this relocation, which includes additional severance and other costs.

The pretax charges discussed above are reported in the “Restructuring charges” line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

10

Table of Contents

Note 5. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company carries insurance policies on insurable risks at levels that it believes to be appropriate, including workers’ compensation, auto and general liability risks. The Company purchases insurance from third-party insurance carriers. These policies often incorporate deductibles or self-insured retentions. The Company is required to pay all claims that fall below the retention limits. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had accrued self-insured claims of $151 million and $159 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, the Company recorded provisions for uninsured claims totaling $28 million, $8 million and $29 million, respectively, and the Company paid claims totaling $37 million, $8 million and $33 million, respectively. The Company uses historical claims experience to establish both the current year accrual and the underlying provision for future losses. This actuarially determined provision and related accrual includes both known claims, as well as incurred but not reported claims. The Company adjusts its estimate of accrued self-insured claims when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in health care costs, accident frequency and claim severity.

Accruals for warranty claims in the American Home Shield business are made based on the Company’s claims experience and actuarial projections. Termite damage claim accruals are recorded based on both the historical rates of claims incurred within a contract year and the cost per claim. Current activity could differ causing a change in estimates. The Company has certain liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues for these liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Any resulting adjustments, which could be material, are recorded in the period the adjustments are identified.

The Company maintains lease facilities with banks totaling $65 million, which provide for the financing of branch properties to be leased by the Company. At September 30, 2008, approximately $65 million was funded under these facilities. Approximately $12 million of these leases are treated as capital leases and have been included on the balance sheet as assets with related debt as of September 30, 2008. The balance of the funded amount is treated as operating leases. The Company has guaranteed the residual value of the properties under the leases up to 73 percent of the fair market value at the commencement of the lease. At September 30, 2008, the Company’s residual value guarantee related to the leased assets totaled $53 million for which the Company has recorded the estimated fair value of this guarantee (approximately $0.1 million) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. In connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company amended these leases effective July 24, 2007. Among the modifications, the Company extended the lease terms through July 24, 2010. The operating lease and capital lease classifications of these leases did not change as a result of the modifications.

The majority of the Company’s vehicle fleet and some equipment are leased through operating leases. The lease terms are non-cancelable for the first twelve-month term, and then are month-to-month, cancelable at the Company’s option. There are residual value guarantees by the Company (ranging from 70 percent to 84 percent of the estimated terminal value at the inception of the lease depending on the agreement) relative to these vehicles and equipment, which historically have not resulted in significant net payments to the lessors. At September 30, 2008, there was approximately $114 million of residual value relating to the Company’s fleet and equipment leases. The fair value of the assets under all of the fleet and equipment leases is expected to substantially mitigate the Company’s guarantee obligations under the agreements. At September 30, 2008, the Company has recorded the estimated fair value of this guarantee of approximately $2.1 million in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

The Company has guarantees on certain bonds issued by divested companies, primarily performance type bonds. The maximum payments the Company could be required to make if the buyers of the divested companies are unable to fulfill their obligations is approximately $4.1 million at September 30, 2008. Substantially all of the bonds are scheduled to expire in 2008, but may be extended depending on the completion of the related projects. The Company believes that if it were to incur a loss on any individual bond guarantee, the likelihood of which the Company believes is remote, such loss would not have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, annual results of operations or cash flows.

In the ordinary course of conducting its business activities, the Company becomes involved in judicial, administrative and regulatory proceedings involving both private parties and governmental authorities. These proceedings include general and commercial liability and employment actions as well as environmental proceedings. The Company does not expect any of these proceedings to have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, annual results of operations or cash flows.

11

Table of Contents

Note 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill and intangible assets that are not amortized are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Company’s annual assessment date is October 1.

The table below summarizes the goodwill balances by segment for continuing operations:

The table below summarizes the other intangible asset balances for continuing operations:

Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation

On November 20, 2007, the board of directors of Holdings adopted the ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). The Stock Incentive Plan provides for the sale of shares of Holdings stock to ServiceMaster’s executive officers, other key employees and directors as well as the grant of deferred share units and options to purchase shares of Holdings to those individuals. The board of directors of Holdings, or a committee designated by it, selects the officers, employees and directors eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plan and determines the specific number of shares to be offered or options to be granted to an individual employee or director. A maximum of 12,445,000 shares of Holdings stock are reserved for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan. Holdings currently intends to satisfy any need for shares of common stock of Holdings associated with the exercise of options issued under the Stock Incentive Plan through those shares reserved for issuance or any shares repurchased from participants in the Stock Incentive Plan.

All option grants under the Stock Incentive Plan will be non-qualified options with a per-share exercise price no less than the fair market value of one share of Holdings stock on the grant date. Any stock options granted will generally have a term of ten years and vesting will be subject to an employee’s continued employment. The board of directors of Holdings, or a committee designated by it, may accelerate the vesting of an option at any time. In addition, vesting of options will be accelerated if Holdings experiences a change in control (as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan) unless options with substantially equivalent terms and economic value are substituted for existing options in place of accelerated vesting. Vesting of options will also be accelerated in the event of an employee’s death or disability (as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan). Upon a termination for cause (as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan), all options held by an employee are immediately cancelled. Following a termination without cause, vested options will generally remain exercisable through the earliest of the expiration of their term or three months following termination of employment (one year in the case of death, disability or retirement at normal retirement age).

Unless sooner terminated by the board of directors of Holdings, the Stock Incentive Plan will remain in effect until November 20, 2017.

All options granted will vest in four equal annual installments, subject to an employee’s continued employment. The four-year vesting period is the requisite service period over which compensation cost will be recognized on a straight-line

12

Table of Contents

basis for all grants. The options will be accounted for as equity-classified awards. The non-cash stock-based compensation expense associated with the Stock Incentive Plan is pushed down from Holdings and recorded in the financial statements of ServiceMaster.

During the Successor three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, stock-based compensation expense was approximately $1.7 million ($1.2 million after-tax) and $5.1 million ($4.2 million after-tax), respectively. During the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, stock-based compensation expense was approximately $0.4 million ($0.2 million after-tax) and $3.4 million ($2.0 million after-tax), respectively. There was no stock-based compensation expense during the Successor period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007.

As of September 30, 2008, there was approximately $22.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options to purchase shares of Holdings stock. These remaining costs are expected to be recognized over the remaining 3.2 years of the weighted average four-year requisite service period.

Note 8. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

In the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the caption “Cash and cash equivalents” includes investments in short-term, highly-liquid securities having a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Supplemental information relating to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Successor nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Successor Period from July 25 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 is presented in the following table:

Note 9. Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income (loss) was $4 million and ($45) million for the Successor three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and ($20) million, ($16) million and $83 million for the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007, the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively. Total comprehensive income primarily includes net income, unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments and the effect of foreign currency translation.

Note 10. Receivable Sales

The Company has an arrangement to provide for the ongoing revolving sale of a designated pool of accounts receivable of TruGreen LawnCare and Terminix to a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, ServiceMaster Funding Company LLC. ServiceMaster Funding Company LLC has entered into an arrangement pursuant to which it may transfer, on a revolving basis, an undivided percentage ownership interest in a pool of accounts receivable to unrelated third party purchasers. ServiceMaster Funding Company LLC retains an undivided percentage interest in the pool of accounts receivable and bad debt losses for the entire pool are allocated first to this retained interest. During the third quarter of 2008 an interest in the pool of accounts receivable was transferred to a third party in exchange for $10 million. During the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007, the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, there were no transfers of interests in the pool of accounts receivables to third parties under this arrangement. The arrangement is a 364-day facility that is renewable at the option of ServiceMaster Funding Company LLC, with a final termination date of July 17, 2012. The Company may transfer up to $50 million of interests in its pool of receivables to these purchasers and therefore has immediate access to cash proceeds from these transfers. The amount of the eligible receivables varies during the year based on seasonality of the business and could, at times, limit the amount available to the Company from the sale of these interests. There are two potential third party purchasers under the arrangement. However, only one purchaser is required to purchase interests in the pool of receivables under the arrangement. If this purchaser were to exercise its right to terminate its participation in the arrangement, which it may do in the third quarter of each year, the amount of cash available to the Company may be reduced or eliminated. The purchaser did not exercise its right to terminate its participation in the arrangement in the third quarter of 2008.

The Company has recorded its obligation to repay the third party for its interest in the pool of receivables as long-term debt in these condensed consolidated financial statements. The interest rates applicable to the Company’s obligation are based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured based on the third party purchaser’s pooled commercial paper rate, as defined (4.34% at September 30, 2008).

13

Table of Contents

Note 11. Cash and Marketable Securities

Cash, money market funds and certificates of deposits, with maturities of three months or less, are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position caption “Cash and Cash Equivalents.” As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s investments consist primarily of domestic publicly traded debt of $90.3 million and $130.6 million, respectively and common equity securities of $54.4 million and $137.2 million, respectively.

The aggregate market value of the Company’s short-term and long-term investments in debt and equity securities was $144.7 million and $267.8 million and the aggregate cost basis was $147.8 million and $260.8 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a specific identification basis, are included in investment income in the period they are realized. The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of investments to determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the value of the investments from factors such as deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer or the market(s) in which it competes. The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.9 million ($0.6 million after-tax) and $9.0 million ($7.3 million after-tax) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, due to other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments. The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.3 million ($0.2 million after-tax) and $0.9 million ($0.6 million after-tax) during the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, due to other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments. There was no impairment charge recorded during the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 due to other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments. The unrealized gains in the investment portfolio were approximately $3.6 million and $8.4 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Unrealized losses were approximately $6.7 million and $1.4 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The portion of unrealized losses which have been in a loss position for more than one year at September 30, 2008 was approximately $0.1 million. There were no unrealized losses which have been in a loss position for more than one year at December 31, 2007. The aggregate fair value of the investments with unrealized losses totaled $46.2 million and $20.4 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Note 12. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is summarized in the following table:

The Interim Loan Facility matured on July 24, 2008. On the maturity date, outstanding amounts under the Interim Loan Facility were converted on a one to one basis into the Permanent Notes. The Permanent Notes were issued pursuant to a refinancing indenture. In connection with the issuance of Permanent Notes, ServiceMaster entered into a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which ServiceMaster filed with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the resale of the Permanent Notes on October 22, 2008.

In February 2008, the Company entered into two 3-year interest rate swap agreements and one 4-year interest rate swap agreement, effective March 3, 2008. The total notional amount of the 3-year agreements was $250 million and the total notional amount of the 4-year swap agreement was $250 million. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company will pay a weighted average fixed rate of interest of approximately 3.15% on the notional amount of the 3-year swap agreements and 3.48% on the notional amount of the 4-year swap agreement. The Company will receive a floating rate of interest (based on

14

Table of Contents

three month LIBOR) on the notional amount. Therefore, the effective interest rate for $500 million of the term loans is fixed at a rate between 5.90% and 6.23%, including the borrowing margin described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Annual Report.

In August 2008, the Company entered into two 3-year interest rate swap agreements effective September 2, 2008. The total notional amount of the swap agreements was $200 million. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company will pay a weighted average fixed rate of interest of approximately 3.83% on the $200 million notional amount of the swap agreements. The Company will receive a floating rate of interest (based on one month LIBOR) on the notional amount. Therefore, the effective interest rate for $200 million of the term loans is fixed at a rate of approximately 6.58%, including the borrowing margin described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Annual Report.

In September 2008, the Company entered into a 4-year interest rate swap agreement effective October 1, 2008. The notional amount of the swap agreement was $200 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will pay a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 3.53% on the $200 million notional amount of the swap agreement. The Company will receive a floating rate of interest (based on one month LIBOR) on the notional amount. Therefore, the effective interest rate for $200 million of the term loans is fixed at a rate of approximately 6.28%, including the borrowing margin described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Annual Report.

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, the interest rate swap agreements referred to above are classified as cash flow hedges and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of the changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in other comprehensive income.

Note 13. Discontinued Operations

Reported “loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes” for all periods presented includes the operating results of the sold and discontinued businesses noted in the 2007 Annual Report.

During the third quarter of 2008, the Company completed the sale of InStar for $22.9 million, with the payment of $3.0 million of that amount deferred until November 2011. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $6.3 million as a result of a change in our fair value estimate of InStar’s net assets based on changing market conditions and the ongoing sales process. Upon the sale of InStar the Company recorded a loss on sale, net of tax, of $0.6 million. The purchase price noted above is subject to a final adjustment based on closing date working capital balances at InStar. These closing balances are subject to a review period by the Company and the purchasers of InStar. The loss on sale noted above includes an estimated adjustment for the closing date working capital balances. However, this amount could change pending the completion of the review in the fourth quarter of 2008. Such changes, if any, would not currently be expected to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The operating results and financial position of discontinued operations are as follows:

15

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 for the remaining liabilities from operations that were disposed of in years prior to 2008. The remaining obligations primarily relate to long-term self-insurance claims. The Company believes that the remaining reserves continue to be adequate and reasonable.

Note 14. Income Taxes

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $16.1 million and $13.3 million, respectively, of tax items primarily reflected in state tax returns that had not been recognized for financial reporting (“unrecognized tax benefits”). If recognized prior to December 31, 2008, $12.3 million ($8.9 million, net of federal and state tax effects) would be recorded as a purchase accounting adjustment to goodwill and $3.8 million ($3.4 million, net of federal and state tax effects) would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.

Up to $7.4 million of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized within the next twelve months. The Company recognized approximately $0.5 million of its unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and approximately $1.7 million and $5.5 million during the Successor Period from July 25 to September 30, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, respectively.

The Company files consolidated and separate income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has been audited by the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) through 2006 and is no longer subject to state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001.

In the ordinary course, the Company is subject to review by domestic and foreign taxing authorities, including the IRS. As noted above, the U.S. federal tax returns filed by the Company through the 2006 return have been reviewed by the IRS. The Company paid $5 million primarily in the first quarter of 2006 relating to the resolution of the 2003 and 2004 audits. The IRS completed the audits of the Company’s tax returns for 2005 and 2006, with no adjustments or additional payments. The IRS commenced examinations of the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for 2007 and 2008 in the first quarter of 2007 and the third quarter of 2008, respectively. At this time, the outcome of these audits is not known and no significant adjustments have been proposed by the IRS pertaining to these audit periods. Five state tax authorities are in the process of auditing state income tax returns of various subsidiaries. One state audit is at the appeals level. If state authorities were to prevail with their assessments, the Company does not anticipate that these adjustments would have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, annual results of operations or cash flows.

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties related to its tax positions within the tax provision. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, through the tax provision. During the Successor Period from July 25, 2007 to September 30, 2007, the Predecessor Period from July 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the Predecessor Period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $10 thousand, $10 thousand and $0.8 million, respectively, through the tax provision. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had accrued for the payment of interest and penalties of approximately $3.3 million ($2.0 million, net of federal and state tax effects) and $2.4 million ($1.4 million, net of federal and state tax effects), respectively.

16

Table of Contents