Edgar Filing: PENNS WOODS BANCORP INC

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011.

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act for the Transition Period

from to .

No. 0-17077

(Commission File Number)

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA		23-2226454
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967 Williamsport, Pennsylvania		17703-0967
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(570) 322-1111

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨		Small reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

On May 3, 2011 there were 3,835,637 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

		Page
		Number

Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		3

Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		4

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		5

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		5

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	37

Part II	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	38
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	38
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	38
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	38
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	38
Item 5.	Other Information	38
Item 6.	Exhibits	39
Signatures		40
Exhibit Index and Exhibits		41

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(UNAUDITED)

	March 31,			December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)	2011			2010
ASSETS:
Noninterest-bearing balances	$	10,950		$	9,467
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions	554			26
Total cash and cash equivalents	11,504			9,493

Investment securities, available for sale, at fair value	220,877			215,565
Investment securities, held to maturity, (fair value of $53 and $83)	53			83
Loans held for sale	4,818			6,658
Loans	412,093			415,557
Less: Allowance for loan losses	6,640			6,035
Loans, net	405,453			409,522
Premises and equipment, net	7,634			7,658
Accrued interest receivable	3,638			3,765
Bank-owned life insurance	15,640			15,436
Investment in limited partnerships	4,040			4,205
Goodwill	3,032			3,032
Deferred tax asset	11,554			11,897
Other assets	5,094			4,374
TOTAL ASSETS	$	693,337		$	691,688

LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	433,439		$	428,161
Noninterest-bearing deposits	95,278			89,347
Total deposits	528,717			517,508

Short-term borrowings	15,636			27,299
Long-term borrowings, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)	71,778			71,778
Accrued interest payable	694			750
Other liabilities	7,514			7,733
TOTAL LIABILITIES	624,339			625,068

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, par value $8.33, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,016,233 and 4,015,753 shares issued	33,468			33,464
Additional paid-in capital	18,078			18,064
Retained earnings	32,180			31,091
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities	(6,005		)	(7,276		)
Defined benefit plan	(2,413		)	(2,413		)
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 180,596 shares	(6,310		)	(6,310		)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	68,998			66,620
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	693,337		$	691,688

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	2011		2010

INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	6,288	$	6,330
Investment securities:
Taxable	1,375		1,349
Tax-exempt	1,267		1,258
Dividend and other interest income	52		52
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME	8,982		8,989

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	1,194		1,710
Short-term borrowings	57		64
Long-term borrowings, FHLB	734		917
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE	1,985		2,691

NET INTEREST INCOME	6,997		6,298

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	600		300

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	6,397		5,998

NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges	503		510
Securities gains (losses), net	125		(3		)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance	174		171
Gain on sale of loans	249		182
Insurance commissions	209		264
Other	685		572
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME	1,945		1,696

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	2,632		2,737
Occupancy, net	348		331
Furniture and equipment	308		304
Pennsylvania shares tax	172		169
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships	166		142
Other	1,362		1,303
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE	4,988		4,986

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION	3,354		2,708
INCOME TAX PROVISION	501		260
NET INCOME	$	2,853	$	2,448

NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC	$	0.74	$	0.64

NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED	$	0.74	$	0.64

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC	3,835,295		3,834,296

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED	3,835,295		3,834,448

DIVIDENDS PER SHARE	$	0.46	$	0.46

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

									ACCUMULATED
	COMMON			ADDITIONAL					OTHER						TOTAL
	STOCK			PAID-IN		RETAINED			COMPREHENSIVE			TREASURY			SHAREHOLDERS’
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	SHARES	AMOUNT		CAPITAL		EARNINGS			INCOME (LOSS)			STOCK			EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2009	4,013,142	$	33,443	$	18,008	$	27,218		$	(5,489	)	$	(6,264	)	$	66,916

Comprehensive income:
Net income						2,448									2,448
Other comprehensive income									357						357
Dividends declared, ($0.46 per share)						(1,765		)							(1,765		)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan	521	4		12											16
Balance, March 31, 2010	4,013,663	$	33,447	$	18,020	$	27,901		$	(5,132	)	$	(6,264	)	$	67,972

									ACCUMULATED
	COMMON			ADDITIONAL					OTHER						TOTAL
	STOCK			PAID-IN		RETAINED			COMPREHENSIVE			TREASURY			SHAREHOLDERS’
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	SHARES	AMOUNT		CAPITAL		EARNINGS			INCOME (LOSS)			STOCK			EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2010	4,015,753	$	33,464	$	18,064	$	31,091		$	(9,689	)	$	(6,310	)	$	66,620

Comprehensive income:
Net income						2,853									2,853
Other comprehensive income									1,271						1,271
Dividends declared, ($0.46 per share)						(1,764		)							(1,764		)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan	480	4		14											18
Balance, March 31, 2011	4,016,233	$	33,468	$	18,078	$	32,180		$	(8,418	)	$	(6,310	)	$	68,998

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011			2010

Net Income		$	2,853			$	2,448
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities	2,051			538
Net realized gain (loss) included in net income	125			(3	)
Other comprehensive income before tax expense	1,926			541
Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income	655			184
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		1,271				357
Comprehensive income		$	4,124			$	2,805

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011			2010

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	2,853		$	2,448
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	175			190
Provision for loan losses	600			300
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums	(459		)	(547		)
Securities (gains) losses, net	(125		)	3
Originations of loans held for sale	(8,686		)	(7,130		)
Proceeds of loans held for sale	10,775			7,011
Gain on sale of loans	(249		)	(182		)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance	(174		)	(171		)
Decrease in prepaid federal deposit insurance	165			175
Other, net	(693		)	(37		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	4,182			2,060
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales	2,728			147
Proceeds from calls and maturities	2,001			7,046
Purchases	(7,876		)	(14,592		)
Investment securities held to maturity:
Proceeds from sales	5			—
Proceeds from calls and maturities	25			—
Net decrease (increase) in loans	2,892			(4,515		)
Acquisition of bank premises and equipment	(151		)	(215		)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets	92			26
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance	(32		)	(31		)
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit	—			82
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock	345			—
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities	29			(12,052		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits	5,278			22,739
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits	5,931			1,014
Net decrease in short-term borrowings	(11,663		)	(5,376		)
Dividends paid	(1,764		)	(1,765		)
Issuance of common stock	18			16
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities	(2,200		)	16,628
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	2,011			6,636
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING	9,493			13,788
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING	$	11,504		$	20,424

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Interest paid	$	2,041		$	2,774
Income taxes paid	750			550
Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate	577			32

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., and Jersey Shore State Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The interim financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are the same as those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented on pages 39 through 46 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.

Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts. This ASU addresses the diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities may early adopt the amendments using the effective date for public entities. This ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-01, Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20. The amendments in this Update temporarily delay the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in Update

Table of Contents

2010-20, enabling public-entity creditors to provide those disclosures after the FASB clarifies the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The deferral in this Update will result in more consistent disclosures about troubled debt restructurings. This amendment does not defer the effective date of the other disclosure requirements in Update 2010-20. In the proposed Update for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, the FASB proposed that the clarifications would be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. For the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in Update 2010-20, those clarifications would be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the fiscal year in which the proposal is adopted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The amendments in this Update provide additional guidance or clarification to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 3. Per Share Data

There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share. Net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator. The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive earnings per share computation.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010

Weighted average common shares issued	4,015,891		4,013,324

Average treasury stock shares	(180,596	)	(179,028	)

Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share	3,835,295		3,834,296

Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share	—		152

Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share	3,835,295		3,834,448

Options to purchase 990 shares of common stock at a strike price of $24.72 were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The average market price of the Company’s stock was $32.23 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. There were no options outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

Note 4. Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	March 31, 2011
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In Thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	27,155	$	1,772	$	(6	)	$	28,921
State and political securities	170,843		570		(13,708		)	157,705
Other debt securities	19,972		450		(10		)	20,412
Total debt securities	217,970		2,792		(13,724		)	207,038
Financial institution securities	11,205		1,927		(76		)	13,056
Other equity securities	800		16		(33		)	783
Total equity securities	12,005		1,943		(109		)	13,839
Total investment securities AFS	$	229,975	$	4,735	$	(13,833	)	$	220,877

Held to maturity (HTM)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Other debt securities	53		—		—			53
Total investment securities HTM	$	53	$	—	$	—		$	53

	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In Thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	24,759	$	1,854	$	—		$	26,613
State and political securities	169,844		282		(15,339		)	154,787
Other debt securities	20,141		503		(36		)	20,608
Total debt securities	214,744		2,639		(15,375		)	202,008
Financial institution securities	11,549		1,686		(44		)	13,191
Other equity securities	296		70		—			366
Total equity securities	11,845		1,756		(44		)	13,557
Total investment securities AFS	$	226,589	$	4,395	$	(15,419	)	$	215,565

Held to maturity (HTM)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	5	$	—	$	—		$	5
Other debt securities	78		—		—			78
Total investment securities HTM	$	83	$	—	$	—		$	83

The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011
	Less than Twelve Months				Twelve Months or Greater				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(In Thousands)	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses

U.S. Government and agency securities	$	988	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	988	$	6
State and political securities	88,673		4,087		33,583		9,621		122,256		13,708
Other debt securities	2,095		10		—		—		2,095		10
Total debt securities	91,756		4,103		33,583		9,621		125,339		13,724
Financial institution securities	805		76		—		—		805		76
Other equity securities	362		33		—		—		362		33
Total equity securities	1,167		109		—		—		1,167		109
Total	$	92,923	$	4,212	$	33,583	$	9,621	$	126,506	$	13,833

	December 31, 2010
	Less than Twelve Months				Twelve Months or Greater				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(In Thousands)	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses

U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
State and political securities	105,826		5,883		32,847		9,456		138,673		15,339
Other debt securities	2,501		19		282		17		2,783		36
Total debt securities	108,327		5,902		33,129		9,473		141,456		15,375
Financial institution securities	859		41		59		3		918		44
Other equity securities	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total equity securities	859		41		59		3		918		44
Total	$	109,186	$	5,943	$	33,188	$	9,476	$	142,374	$	15,419

At March 31, 2011 there were a total of 133 and 77 individual securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and greater than twelve months, respectively.

The Company reviews its position quarterly and has determined that, at March 31, 2011, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. There were 210 positions that were temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011. The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes, sector credit ratings changes, or company-specific ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized				Amortized
(In Thousands)	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	1,969	$	2,002	$	—	$	—
Due after one year to five years	18,647		19,028		53		53
Due after five years to ten years	6,378		6,092		—		—
Due after ten years	190,976		179,916		—		—
Total	$	217,970	$	207,038	$	53	$	53

Table of Contents

Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $2,728,000 and $147,000, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table represents gross realized gains and losses on those transactions:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011		2010
Gross realized gains:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	4	$	—
State and political securities	5		—
Other debt securities	6		6
Financial institutions securities	—		—
Other equity securities	121		—
Total gross realized gains	$	136	$	6

Gross realized losses:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	—
State and political securities	—		—
Other debt securities	11		9
Financial institutions securities	—		—
Other equity securities	—		—
Total gross realized losses	$	11	$	9

There were no impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 5. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (the “FHLB”), which is one of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. Each Federal Home Loan Bank serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from funds deposited by member institutions and proceeds from the sale of consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. It makes loans to members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures established by the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank. As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB in an amount equal to the sum of 0.35% of the membership asset value at December 31, 2010, 4.60% of advances, and 1.60% of letters of credit. At March 31, 2011, the Bank held $6,592,300 in stock of the FHLB, which was in compliance with this requirement.

The Company evaluated its holding of FHLB stock for impairment and deemed the stock to not be impaired due to the expected recoverability of the par value, which equals the value reflected within the Company’s financial statements. The decision was based on several items ranging from the estimated true economic losses embedded within the FHLB’s mortgage portfolio to the FHLB’s liquidity position and credit rating. The Company utilizes the impairment framework outlined in GAAP to evaluate FHLB stock for impairment.

The following factors were evaluated to determine the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the Company’s FHLB stock holding; (i) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted; (ii) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB; (iii) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB; (iv) the liquidity position of the FHLB; and (v) whether a decline is temporary or whether it affects the ultimate recoverability of the FHLB stock based on (a) the materiality of the carrying amount to the member

Table of Contents

institution and (b) whether an assessment of the institution’s operational needs for the foreseeable future allow management to dispose of the stock.

Based on its analysis of these factors, the Company determined that its holding of FHLB stock was not impaired on March 31, 2011.

Note 6. Credit Quality and Related Allowance for Loan Losses

Management segments the Bank’s loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics. Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics. Categories include commercial and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Real estate loans are further segmented into three categories: residential, commercial and construction.

The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2011
					Past Due
					90 Days
			Past Due		Or More
			30 To 89		& Still		Non-
(In Thousands)	Current		Days		Accruing		Accrual		Total
Commercial and agricultural	$	52,282	$	160	$	4	$	244	$	52,690
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	165,287		4,153		98		673		170,211
Commercial	154,708		322		—		1,310		156,340
Construction	14,830		171		—		10,568		25,569
Installment loans to individuals	8,841		115		1		2		8,959
	395,948		$	4,921	$	103	$	12,797	413,769
Less: Net deferred loan fees and discounts	1,676								1,676
Allowance for loan losses	6,640								6,640
Loans, net	$	387,632							$	405,453

	December 31, 2010
					Past Due
					90 Days
			Past Due		Or More
			30 To 90		& Still		Non-
(In Thousands)	Current		Days		Accruing		Accrual		Total
Commercial and agricultural	$	50,208	$	426	$	215	$	4	$	50,853
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	166,354		6,356		259		609		173,578
Commercial	157,764		438		60		1,927		160,189
Construction	13,836		5,592		—		3,117		22,545
Installment loans to individuals	9,199		209		23		1		9,432
	397,361		$	13,021	$	557	$	5,658	416,597
Less: Net deferred loan fees	1,040								1,040
Allowance for loan losses	6,035								6,035
Loans, net	$	390,286							$	409,522

Table of Contents

If interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans, interest income on non-accrual loans would have approximated $210,000, and $59,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest income on such loans amounted to approximately $6,000 and $0, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Bank evaluates such loans for impairment individually and does not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Bank may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than $100,000 and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard. Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than $100,000 on a case by case basis.

Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent with the Bank’s policy on nonaccrual loans.

The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011
	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
(In Thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	$	85	$	85	$	—
Real estate mortgages - residential	880		880		—
Real estate mortgages - commercial	1,893		1,893		—
Real estate mortgages - construction	259		259		—
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	3,117		3,117		—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	244		244		244
Real estate mortgages - residential	570		570		71
Real estate mortgages - commercial	1,877		1,877		160
Real estate mortgages - construction	12,372		12,640		3,137
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	15,063		15,331		3,612
Total:
Commercial and agricultural	329		329		244
Real estate mortgages - residential	1,450		1,450		71
Real estate mortgages - commercial	3,770		3,770		160
Real estate mortgages - construction	12,631		12,899		3,137
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	$	18,180	$	18,448	$	3,612

	December 31, 2010
	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
(In Thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	$	90	$	90	$	—
Real estate mortgages - residential	888		888		—
Real estate mortgages - commercial	2,498		2,498		—
Real estate mortgages - construction	260		260		—
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	3,736		3,736		—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	—		—		—
Real estate mortgages - residential	572		572		80
Real estate mortgages - commercial	1,889		1,889		158
Real estate mortgages - construction	9,860		10,128		2,518
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	12,321		12,589		2,756
Total:
Commercial and agricultural	90		90		—
Real estate mortgages - residential	1,460		1,460		80
Real estate mortgages - commercial	4,387		4,387		158
Real estate mortgages - construction	10,120		10,388		2,518
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—
	$	16,057	$	16,325	$	2,756

Table of Contents

Impaired loans which are troubled debt restructurings amounted to approximately $5,362,000 and $4,799,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011		2010
Average investment in impaired loans	$	10,005	$	8,162
Interest income recognized on an accrual basis on impaired loans	79		90
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	6		—

There is approximately $475,000 committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Internal Risk Ratings

Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are considered Substandard. Loans in the Doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the Substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced. Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt. Loans classified Loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Bank has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. An external annual loan review of all commercial relationships $800,000 or greater is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2011
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Pass	$	51,505	$	168,503	$	142,796	$	12,939	$	8,956	$	384,699
Special Mention	589		476		9,119		—		—		10,184
Substandard	596		1,232		4,425		12,630		3		18,886
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	52,690	$	170,211	$	156,340	$	25,569	$	8,959	$	413,769

Table of Contents

	December 31, 2010
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Pass	$	49,702	$	171,588	$	145,887	$	11,840	$	9,408	$	388,425
Special Mention	565		526		9,195		—		—		10,286
Substandard	586		1,464		5,107		10,705		24		17,886
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	50,853	$	173,578	$	160,189	$	22,545	$	9,432	$	416,597

Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

The Bank’s methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance. The total of the two components represents the Bank’s ALL.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into two classes for evaluation. A general allowance is determined for “Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.

For the general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a twelve quarter moving average. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; value of underlying collateral; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint.

Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors. Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

Table of Contents

Activity in the allowance is presented for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	March 31, 2011
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages							Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential			Commercial		Construction		to Individuals			Totals
Beginning Balance	$	466	$	980		$	1,508	$	2,893	$	188		$	6,035
Charge-offs	—		25			—		—		19			44
Recoveries	6		2			20		2		19			49
Provision	184		(66		)	56		445		(19		)	600
Ending Balance	$	656	$	891		$	1,584	$	3,340	$	169		$	6,640

	March 31, 2010
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages							Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential			Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Beginning Balance	$	569	$	972		$	1,491	$	1,403	$	222	$	4,657
Charge-offs	91		22			—		—		37		150
Recoveries	—		4			—		3		50		57
Provision	26		(42		)	71		238		7		300
Ending Balance	$	504	$	912		$	1,562	$	1,644	$	242	$	4,864

The Company has a concentration of loans to both owners of commercial and residential rental properties at March 31, 2011 and 2010 of 16.77% and 13.91% and 15.63% and 15.03% of total loans, respectively.

The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers throughout north-central Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio at March 31, 2011, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2011
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	244	$	71	$	160	$	3,137	$	—	$	3,612
Collectively evaluated for impairment	412		820		1,424		203		169		3,028
Total ending allowance balance	$	656	$	891	$	1,584	$	3,340	$	169	$	6,640

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	329	$	1,450	$	3,770	$	12,631	$	—	$	18,180
Collectively evaluated for impairment	52,361		168,761		152,571		12,937		8,959		395,589
Total ending loans balance	$	52,690	$	170,211	$	156,341	$	25,568	$	8,959	$	413,769

	December 31, 2010
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	80	$	158	$	2,518	$	—	$	2,756
Collectively evaluated for impairment	466		900		1,350		375		188		3,279
Total ending allowance balance	$	466	$	980	$	1,508	$	2,893	$	188	$	6,035

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	90	$	1,460	$	4,387	$	10,120	$	—	$	16,057
Collectively evaluated for impairment	50,636		172,118		155,930		12,424		9,432		400,540
Total ending loans balance	$	50,726	$	173,578	$	160,317	$	22,544	$	9,432	$	416,597

Table of Contents

Note 7. Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans

For a detailed disclosure on the Company’s pension and employee benefits plans, please refer to Note 12 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit cost of the domestic non-contributory defined benefit plan for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011			2010

Service cost	$	106		$	132
Interest cost	178			171
Expected return on plan assets	(184		)	(161		)
Amortization of transition obligation	(1		)	(1		)
Amortization of prior service cost	6			6
Amortization of net loss	41			36
Net periodic cost	$	146		$	183

The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy detailed in Note 10 (Fair Value Measurements), the Plan’s assets at fair value as of March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	March 31, 2011
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	231	$	—	$	—	$	231
Mutual funds - taxable fixed income	3,477		—		—		3,477
Mutual funds - domestic equity	4,354		—		—		4,354
Mutual funds - international equity	1,391		—		—		1,391
Total assets at fair value	$	9,453	$	—	$	—	$	9,453

	December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	235	$	—	$	—	$	235
Mutual Funds - Taxable Fixed Income	3,261		—		—		3,261
Mutual Funds - Domestic Equity	4,200		—		—		4,200
Mutual Funds - International Equity	1,376		—		—		1,376
Total assets at fair value	$	9,072	$	—	$	—	$	9,072

Employer Contributions

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, that it expected to contribute a minimum of $957,000 to its defined benefit plan in 2011. As of March 31, 2011, there were contributions of $100,000 made to the plan.

Table of Contents

Note 8. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company maintains the Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”). The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company. The Plan allows for up to 1,000,000 shares to be purchased by employees. The purchase price of the shares is 95% of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of 15% of base compensation or $12,000 in market value annually. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were 480 and 521 shares issued under the plan, respectively.

Note 9. Off Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are primarily comprised of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31,		December 31,
(In Thousands)	2011		2010
Commitments to extend credit	$	83,617	$	82,124
Standby letters of credit	1,212		1,228

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts. The coverage period for these instruments is typically a one year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management. Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period. For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements

The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.

Table of Contents

Level I:	Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II:	Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III:	Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.

The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

	March 31, 2011
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total

Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	28,921	$	—	$	28,921
State and political securities	—		157,705		—		157,705
Other debt securities	—		20,412		—		20,412
Financial institution securities	13,056		—		—		13,056
Other equity securities	783		—		—		783
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	$	13,839	$	207,038	$	—	$	220,877

	December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total

Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	26,613	$	—	$	26,613
State and political securities	—		154,787		—		154,787
Other debt securities	—		20,608		—		20,608
Financial institution securities	13,191		—		—		13,191
Other equity securities	366		—		—		366
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	$	13,557	$	202,008	$	—	$	215,565

The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total

Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	14,568	$	—	$	14,568
Other real estate owned	—		1,108		—		1,108
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$	—	$	15,676	$	—	$	15,676

	December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total

Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	13,301	$	—	$	13,301
Other real estate owned	—		609		—		609
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$	—	$	13,910	$	—	$	13,910

Note 11. Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company is required to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the estimates.

Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The Company’s fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.

As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, this estimated fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(In Thousands)	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,504	$	11,504	$	9,493	$	9,493
Investment securities:
Available for sale	220,877		220,877		215,565		215,565
Held to maturity	53		53		83		83
Loans held for sale	4,818		4,818		6,658		6,658
Loans, net	405,453		397,537		409,522		402,250
Bank-owned life insurance	15,640		15,640		15,436		15,436
Accrued interest receivable	3,638		3,638		3,765		3,765

Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	433,439	$	422,666	$	428,161	$	419,058
Noninterest-bearing deposits	95,278		95,278		89,347		89,347
Short-term borrowings	15,636		15,636		27,299		27,299
Long-term borrowings, FHLB	71,778		75,284		71,778		75,790
Accrued interest payable	694		694		750		750

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings, and Accrued Interest Payable:

The fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Investment Securities:

The fair value of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities. Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Loans:

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.

Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals. If appraisals are not available, estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance:

The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.

Deposits:

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

Table of Contents

The fair value estimates above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.

Long Term Borrowings:

The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:

There is no material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 9 (Off Balance Sheet Risk).

Note 12. Reclassification of Comparative Amounts

Certain comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE

SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact. The Company cautions readers that the following important factors, among others, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company herein: (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including federal and state banking laws and regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization, compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the increasing consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest rates; and (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies.

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

Summary Results

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $2,853,000 compared to $2,448,000 for the same period of 2010 as after-tax securities gains increased $85,000 (from a loss of $2,000 to a gain of $83,000). Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $0.74 compared to $0.64 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 1.65% and 16.62% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 1.42% and 14.31% for the corresponding period of 2010. Net income from core operations (“operating earnings”) increased to $2,770,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $2,450,000 for the same period of 2010. Operating earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $0.72 basic and dilutive compared to $0.64 basic and dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Management uses the non-GAAP measure of net income from core operations, or operating earnings, in its analysis of the Company’s performance. This measure, as used by the Company, adjusts net income by excluding significant gains or losses that are unusual in nature. Because certain of these items and their impact on the Company’s performance are difficult to predict, management believes the presentation of financial measures excluding the impact of such items provides useful supplemental information in evaluating the operating results of the Company’s core businesses. For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, net income from core operations, or operating earnings, means net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net securities gains or losses. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP Income

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	2011		2010
GAAP net income	$	2,853	$	2,448
Less: securities gains (losses), net of tax	83		(2		)
Non-GAAP operating earnings	$	2,770	$	2,450

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Return on average assets (ROA)	1.65	%	1.42	%
Less: securities gains (losses), net of tax	0.05	%	0.00	%
Non-GAAP operating ROA	1.60	%	1.42	%

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Return on average equity (ROE)	16.62	%	14.31	%
Less: securities gains (losses), net of tax	0.48	%	-0.02	%
Non-GAAP operating ROE	16.14	%	14.33	%

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Basic earnings per share (EPS)	$	0.74	$	0.64
Less: securities gains (losses), net of tax	0.02		0.00
Non-GAAP basic operating EPS	$	0.72	$	0.64

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Dilutive EPS	$	0.74	$	0.64
Less: securities gains (losses), net of tax	0.02		0.00
Non-GAAP dilutive operating EPS	$	0.72	$	0.64

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased $7,000 to $8,982,000 compared to $8,989,000 for the same period of 2010. An increase in interest income, led by an increase in investment portfolio interest resulting from growth in the average investment portfolio of $4,190,000 primarily from the addition of short-term corporate and municipal bonds to the portfolio, offset a decline in the average taxable equivalent yield of 4 basis points (“bp”). The decrease in loan portfolio income was the result of portfolio growth that was more than offset by a yield that decreased by 15 bp due to the competitive landscape and downward repricing of the variable rate segment of the loan portfolio.

Interest and dividend income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	For The Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011				March 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Loans including fees	$	6,288	70.00	%	$	6,330	70.42	%	$	(42	)	(0.66	)%
Investment securities:
Taxable	1,375		15.31		1,349		15.01		26			1.93
Tax-exempt	1,267		14.11		1,258		13.99		9			0.72
Dividend and other interest income	52		0.58		52		0.58		—			—
Total interest and dividend income	$	8,982	100.00	%	$	8,989	100.00	%	$	(7	)	(0.08	)%

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased $706,000 to $1,985,000 compared to $2,691,000 for the same period of 2010. The substantial decrease associated with deposits is primarily the result of a reduction of 58 bp in the rate paid on time deposits and a shift from higher cost time deposits to core deposits, with emphasis on money market accounts. Factors that led to the rate decreases include, but are not limited to, Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) interest rate actions and campaigns conducted by the Company during the past two years to attract short-term CDs resulting in an increased repricing frequency. The time deposit portfolio is now being lengthened in order to offer protection when interest rates begin to increase with a focus on maturities of 36 months and greater. In addition, the Marcellus Shale natural gas exploration in north central Pennsylvania is creating opportunities to create new and build upon existing deposit relationships. Short-term borrowings interest expense decreased as the impact of a declining average rate paid compensated for an increase in the average balance. Long-term borrowing interest expense decreased due to the maturities of $15,000,000 since March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

Interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	For The Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011				March 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Deposits	$	1,194	60.15	%	$	1,710	63.54	%	$	(516	)	(30.18	)%
Short-term borrowings	57		2.87		64		2.38		(7		)	(10.94	)
Long-term borrowings, FHLB	734		36.98		917		34.08		(183		)	(19.96	)
Total interest expense	$	1,985	100.00	%	$	2,691	100.00	%	$	(706	)	(26.24	)%

Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin (“NIM”) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 4.89% compared to 4.49% for the corresponding period of 2010. The increase in the NIM was driven by a 50 bp decline in the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities that more than compensated for a 6 bp decline in the yield on interest earning assets. The decrease in earning asset yield is due to the impact on the loan and investment portfolios of the current low rate environment. The decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities from 2.03% to 1.53% was driven by a reduction in the rate paid on time deposits of 58 bp. The reduction in the rate paid on time deposits was the result of a shortening of the time deposit portfolio that has resulted in an increasing repricing frequency during this period of low rates. In addition, a focus on increasing core deposits has resulted in significant growth in lower cost core deposits. The duration of the time deposit portfolio has started to be lengthened due to the apparent bottoming or near bottoming of deposit rates. The average rate on long-term borrowings declined due to the maturity of $15,000,000 in FHLB borrowings that carried an average rate of 4.87%.

The following is a schedule of average balances and associated yields for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

Table of Contents

	AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011						March 31, 2010
(In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
Assets:
Tax-exempt loans	$	20,377	$	308	6.13	%	$	17,346	$	292	6.83	%
All other loans	399,599		6,085		6.18	%	394,957		6,137		6.30	%
Total loans	419,976		6,393		6.17	%	412,303		6,429		6.32	%

Taxable securities	114,740		1,427		4.97	%	106,645		1,400		5.25	%
Tax-exempt securities	103,108		1,920		7.45	%	107,013		1,906		7.12	%
Total securities	217,848		3,347		6.15	%	213,658		3,306		6.19	%

Interest-bearing deposits	2,002		—		0.00	%	7,569		1		0.05	%

Total interest-earning assets	639,826		9,740		6.14	%	633,530		9,736		6.20	%

Other assets	53,883						55,410

Total assets	$	693,709					$	688,940

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Savings	$	66,510	35		0.21	%	$	62,282	53		0.35	%
Super Now deposits	69,177		83		0.49	%	63,046		109		0.70	%
Money market deposits	109,196		265		0.98	%	87,186		287		1.34	%
Time deposits	188,561		811		1.74	%	220,214		1,261		2.32	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	433,444		1,194		1.12	%	432,728		1,710		1.60	%

Short-term borrowings	19,207		57		1.20	%	14,745		64		1.76	%
Long-term borrowings, FHLB	71,778		734		4.09	%	86,778		917		4.23	%
Total borrowings	90,985		791		3.48	%	101,523		981		3.87	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities	524,429		1,985		1.53	%	534,251		2,691		2.03	%

Demand deposits	91,473						78,039
Other liabilities	9,155						8,245
Shareholders’ equity	68,652						68,405

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	693,709					$	688,940
Interest rate spread					4.61	%					4.17	%
Net interest income/margin			$	7,755	4.89	%			$	7,045	4.49	%

1. Information on this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.

2. Nonaccrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.

3. Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands)	2011		2010
Total interest income	$	8,982	$	8,989
Total interest expense	1,985		2,691
Net interest income	6,997		6,298
Tax equivalent adjustment	758		747
Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)	$	7,755	$	7,045

The following table sets forth the respective impact that both volume and rate changes have had on net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011 vs 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans, tax-exempt	$	163		$	(147	)	$	16
Loans	342			(394		)	(52		)
Taxable investment securities	364			(337		)	27
Tax-exempt investment securities	(302		)	316			14
Interest bearing deposits	(1		)	—			(1		)
Total interest-earning assets	566			(562		)	4

Interest expense:
Savings deposits	23			(41		)	(18		)
Super Now deposits	59			(85		)	(26		)
Money market deposits	289			(311		)	(22		)
Time deposits	(343		)	(107		)	(450		)
Short-term borrowings	77			(84		)	(7		)
Long-term borrowings, FHLB	(154		)	(29		)	(183		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(49		)	(657		)	(706		)
Change in net interest income	$	615		$	95		$	710

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Bank. Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.

Table of Contents

The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to non-performing loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.

Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2011, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy, increased unemployment, and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Bank’s loan loss allowance. The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

While determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.

The allowance for loan losses increased from $6,035,000 at December 31, 2010 to $6,640,000 at March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.61% and 1.45%, respectively.

The provision for loan losses totaled $600,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $300,000 for the same periods in 2010. The amount of the increase in the provision was the result of several factors, including but not limited to, a ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans of 3.13% at March 31, 2011 and a ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans of 51.47% at March 31, 2011. Nonperforming loans increased to $12,900,000 at March 31, 2011 from $3,863,000 at March 31, 2010 due to an increase in commercial loan delinquencies. The increase is centered on several loans that are either in a secured position and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position or have a specific allocation for any impairment recorded within the allowance for loan losses. Internal loan review and analysis and the continued uncertainty surrounding the economy, coupled with the ratios noted previously, dictated an increase in the provision for loan losses. The increase did not equate to the change in nonperforming loans due to the economic situation and the collateral status of the nonperforming loans and overall loan portfolio in general, which limits the loan specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses.

Following is a table showing the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

Table of Contents

	For the Three Months Ended
(In Thousands)	March 31, 2011			March 31, 2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,035		$	4,657
Charge-offs:
Real estate	25			22
Commercial and industrial	—			90
Installment loans to individuals	19			37
Total charge-offs	44			149
Recoveries:
Real estate	24			6
Commercial and industrial	6			—
Installment loans to individuals	19			50
Total recoveries	49			56
Net charge-offs	(5		)	93
Additions charged to operations	600			300
Balance at end of period	$	6,640		$	4,864

Ratio of net annualized charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period	0.00		%	0.09		%

Following is a table showing the changes in total nonperforming loans as of:

	Total Nonperforming Loans
			90 Days
(In Thousands)	Nonaccrual		Past Due		Total
March 31, 2011	$	12,797	$	103	$	12,900
December 31, 2010	5,658		557		6,215
September 30, 2010	5,601		1,317		6,918
June 30, 2010	6,299		347		6,646
March 31, 2010	3,703		160		3,863

Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 increased $249,000 to $1,945,000 due in part to a $128,000 increase in net securities gains, from a loss of $3,000 to a gain of $125,000. Excluding net securities gains and losses, non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 would have increased $121,000 compared to the 2010 period. The increase is primarily the result of an increased level of gain on sale of loans as the level of real estate transactions remains brisk within our market. Other income increased as debit and credit card related income continues to build as debit cards continue to gain in popularity, while an increasing number of merchants utilize our merchant card services.

Insurance commissions for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased due to a continued soft market. Management of The M Group continues to pursue new and build upon current relationships. The sales call program continues to expand to other financial institutions, which results in additional revenue for The M Group if an additional sales outlet is added. However, the addition of a sales outlet for The M Group can take up to a year or more to be completed.

Non-interest income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

Table of Contents

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011				March 31, 2010					Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount			% Total		Amount			%
Deposit service charges	$	503	25.85	%	$	510		30.07	%	$	(7	)	(1.37	)%
Securities gains (losses), net	125		6.43		(3		)	(0.18	)	128			4,266.67
Bank owned life insurance	174		8.95		171			10.08		3			1.75
Gain on sale of loans	249		12.80		182			10.73		67			36.81
Insurance commissions	209		10.75		264			15.57		(55		)	(20.83	)
Other	685		35.22		572			33.73		113			19.76
Total non-interest income	$	1,945	100.00	%	$	1,696		100.00	%	$	249		14.68	%

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expense increased $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits was attributable primarily to a reduction in expenses associated with health insurance and the defined benefit pension plan as the investment portfolio performance for the plan improved. Other expenses increased due to various items ranging from training to consulting.

Non-interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011				March 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Salaries and employee benefits	$	2,632	52.76	%	$	2,737	54.89	%	$	(105	)	(3.84	)%
Occupancy, net	348		6.98		331		6.64		17			5.14
Furniture and equipment	308		6.17		304		6.10		4			1.32
Pennsylvania shares tax	172		3.45		169		3.39		3			1.78
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships	166		3.33		142		2.85		24			16.90
Other	1,362		27.31		1,303		26.13		59			4.53
Total non-interest expense	$	4,988	100.00	%	$	4,986	100.00	%	$	2		0.04	%

Provision for Income Taxes

Income taxes increased $241,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. The primary cause of the changes in tax expense is the impact of net securities losses in the three month period of 2010 of $3,000 compared to net securities gains for the same period of 2011 of $125,000. Excluding the impact of the net securities gains and losses, the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 14.18% compared to 9.63% for the same period of 2010. The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position due to the low income housing tax credits earned both currently and previously. Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents increased $2,011,000 from $9,493,000 at December 31, 2010 to $11,504,000 at March 31, 2011 primarily as a result of the following activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011:

Table of Contents

Loans Held for Sale

Activity regarding loans held for sale resulted in loan originations trailing sale proceeds, less $249,000 in realized gains, by $1,840,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Loans

Gross loans decreased $3,464,000 since December 31, 2010 due primarily to a decrease of residential and commercial real estate loans, which was partially offset by an increase in construction real estate loans.

The allocation of the loan portfolio, by category, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is presented below:

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Commercial and agricultural	$	52,690	12.80	%	$	50,853	12.23	%	$	1,837		3.61	%
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	170,211		41.30		173,578		41.77		(3,367		)	(1.94	)
Commercial	156,340		37.94		160,189		38.55		(3,849		)	(2.40	)
Construction	25,569		6.20		22,545		5.43		3,024			13.41
Installment loans to individuals	8,959		2.17		9,432		2.27		(473		)	(5.01	)
Less: Net deferred loan fees	1,676		(0.41	)	1,040		(0.25	)	636			61.15
Gross loans	$	412,093	100.00	%	$	415,557	100.00	%	$	(3,464	)	(0.83	)%

Investments

The fair value of the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2011 has increased $5,282,000 since December 31, 2010. The change is primarily due to purchases of U.S. Government and agency securities coupled with a decrease in the level of net unrealized losses within the state and political securities. The unrealized losses within the debt securities portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 93% of the debt securities portfolio is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.

The Company considers various factors, which include examples from applicable accounting guidance, when analyzing the available for sale portfolio for possible other than temporary impairment. The Company primarily considers the following factors in its analysis: length of time and severity of the market value being less than carrying value; reduction of dividend paid (equities); continued payment of dividend/interest, credit rating, and financial condition of an issuer; intent and ability to hold until anticipated recovery (which may be maturity); and general outlook for the economy, specific industry, and entity in question.

The bond portion of the portfolio review is conducted with emphases on several factors. Continued payment of principal and interest is given primary importance with credit rating and financial condition of the issuer following as the next most important. Credit ratings were reviewed with the ratings of the bonds being satisfactory. Those that were not currently rated were discussed with a third party and/or underwent an internal financial review. The Company also monitors whether each of the investments incurred a decline in market value from carrying value of at least 20% for twelve consecutive months or a similar decline of at least 50% for three consecutive months. Each bond is reviewed to determine whether it is a general obligation bond, which is backed by the credit and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction, or revenue bond, which is only payable from specified revenues. Based on the review undertaken by the Company, the Company determined that the decline in value of the various bond holdings were temporary and were the result of the general market downturns and interest rate/yield curve changes, not credit

Table of Contents

issues. The fact that almost all of such bonds are general obligation bonds further solidified the Company’s determination that the decline in the value of these bond holdings is temporary.

The fair value of the equity portfolio continues to fluctuate as the economic turbulence continues to impact financial sector stock pricing. The equity market improvement over the first three months of 2011 has led to an increase in net unrealized gains of $122,000 to $1,834,000 at March 31, 2011. In addition, the amortized cost of the equity securities portfolio has increased $160,000 as the Company has begun to build the portfolio balance, while continuing to diversify geographic and sector risk.

The equity portion of the portfolio is reviewed for possible other than temporary impairment in a similar manner to the bond portfolio with greater emphasis placed on the length of time the market value has been less than the carrying value and financial sector outlook. The Company also reviews dividend payment activities and, in the case of financial institutions, whether or not such issuer was participating in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The starting point for the equity analysis is the length and severity of a market price decline. The Company monitors two primary measures: 20% decline in market value from carrying value for twelve consecutive months and 50% decline for three consecutive months.

The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and fair values for the debt security portfolio at March 31, 2011 follows:

	A- to AAA				B- to BBB+				C to CCC+				Not Rated				Total
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(In Thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	27,155	$	28,921	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27,155	$	28,921
State and political securities	154,772		144,460		6,900		5,278		—		—		9,171		7,967		170,843		157,705
Other debt securities	19,151		19,589		800		802		—		—		21		21		19,972		20,412
Total debt securities AFS	$	201,078	$	192,970	$	7,700	$	6,080	$	—	$	—	$	9,192	$	7,988	$	217,970	$	207,038

Held to maturity (HTM)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other debt securities	53		53		—		—		—		—		—		—		53		53
Total debt securities HTM	$	53	$	53	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	53	$	53

Financing Activities

Deposits

Total deposits increased $11,209,000 from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. The growth was led by an increase in savings and demand deposits from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 of 7.53% and 6.64%, respectively. The increase in core deposits (deposits less time deposits) has provided relationship driven funding for the loan and investment portfolios, while also reducing the utilization of FHLB borrowings. The increase in deposits is the result of our focus on building relationships with money market accounts being the key building block. Over the past year and through the first three months of 2011, time deposits have decreased as we have taken a position of using these accounts as complementary accounts to core deposits. To facilitate this strategy we are actively working single product time deposit relationships to create a solid relationship through the addition of other products to the customer’s portfolio.

Deposit balances and their changes for the periods being discussed follow:

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Demand deposits	$	95,278	18.02	%	$	89,347	17.27	%	$	5,931		6.64	%
NOW accounts	70,763		13.38		67,505		13.04		3,258			4.83
Money market deposits	108,104		20.45		107,123		20.70		981			0.92
Savings deposits	69,095		13.07		64,258		12.42		4,837			7.53
Time deposits	185,477		35.08		189,275		36.57		(3,798		)	(2.01	)
Total deposits	$	528,717	100.00	%	$	517,508	100.00	%	$	11,209		2.17	%

Borrowed Funds

Total borrowed funds decreased 11.77% or $11,663,000 to $87,414,000 at March 31, 2011 compared to $99,077,000 at December 31, 2010. The decrease in borrowed funds is primarily the result of growth in deposits as part of the previously discussed deposit gathering campaigns that were utilized to provide loan portfolio funding and to reduce the level of total borrowings. FHLB repurchase agreements were utilized as their structure allowed for a reduction in interest expense, while providing the ability to reduce the borrowings at our discretion as deposit levels increased.

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Short-term borrowings:
FHLB repurchase agreements	$	—	—	%	$	14,010	14.14	%	$	(14,010	)	(100.00	)%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	15,636		17.89		13,289		13.41		2,347			17.66
Total short-term borrowings	15,636		17.89		27,299		27.55		(11,663		)	(42.72	)

Long-term borrowings, FHLB	71,778		82.11		71,778		72.45		—			—
Total borrowed funds	$	87,414	100.00	%	$	99,077	100.00	%	$	(11,663	)	(11.77	)%

Capital

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and regulatory guidelines. Management seeks to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings.

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines. The risk-based capital rules are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of total risk-based, tier I risk-based, and tier I leverage capital. In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvements Act (FDICIA) established five capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” To be classified as “well capitalized”, total risk-based, tier I risked-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 10%, 6%, and 5%, respectively.

Capital ratios as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

Table of Contents

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual	$	73,659	16.10	%	$	72,855	15.95	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	36,609		8.00		36,544		8.00
To Be Well Capitalized	45,762		10.00		45,680		10.00

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual	$	67,102	14.66	%	$	66,371	14.53	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	18,305		4.00		18,272		4.00
To Be Well Capitalized	27,457		6.00		27,408		6.00

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual	$	67,102	9.68	%	$	66,371	9.55	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	27,726		4.00		27,790		4.00
To Be Well Capitalized	34,657		5.00		34,738		5.00

Liquidity; Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

The asset/liability committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio. In assessing liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.

The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited at March 31, 2011:

1. Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum

2. Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum

3. Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum

4. Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum

Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk. The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders. Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business opportunities as they arise. The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.

The Bank, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet its liquidity needs for deposit withdrawals, loan commitments and originations, and expenses. In order to control cash flow, the Bank estimates future cash flows from deposits, loan payments, and investment security payments. The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits. Management believes the Bank has adequate resources to meet its normal funding requirements.

Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a long and short-term basis, thereby providing management necessary information to react to current balance sheet trends. Cash flow needs are assessed

Table of Contents

and sources of funds are determined. Funding strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost. Both short and long-term funding needs are addressed by maturities and sales of available for sale investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments such as federal funds sold. The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit provides core funding to satisfy depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.

Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity. Consideration is given to loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds. The Company has a current borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $227,337,000. In addition to this credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of $13,029,000. Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs. FHLB borrowings totaled $71,778,000 as of March 31, 2011.

Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities. Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them. Successful asset/liability management results in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process is affected by segmenting both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected. Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities, for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates. Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted. However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions, net interest income will suffer. Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed. In addition to gap management, the Company has an asset/liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Company currently maintains a GAP position of being liability sensitive. The Company has strategically taken this position as it has decreased the duration of the time deposit portfolio, while continuing to maintain a primarily fixed rate earning asset portfolio with a duration greater than the liabilities utilized to fund earning assets. Lengthening of the liability portfolio coupled with the addition of limited short-term assets is being undertaken. These actions are expected to reduce, but not eliminate, the liability sensitive structure of the balance sheet.

A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and more specifically shareholders’ equity. The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance with this calculation. The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphases placed on interest rate sensitivity. Changes to calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events. As of the most recent analysis, the results of the market value at risk calculation were outside of established guidelines due to the strategic direction being taken.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

In this analysis the Company examines the result of a 100 and 200 basis point change in market interest rates and the effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner. Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.

The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ended March 31, 2012 assuming a static balance sheet as of March 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

	Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
(In Thousands)	-200			-100			Static		+100			+200
Net interest income	$	24,853		$	25,648		$	25,839	$	25,357		$	24,936
Change from static	(986		)	(191		)	—		(482		)	(903		)
Percent change from static	-3.82		%	-0.74		%	—		-1.87		%	-3.49		%

The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected change. In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change. Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Inflation

The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature. Therefore, interest rates rather than inflation have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance. Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors which are not measured by a price index.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk. Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at the Bank level as well as the Company level. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced by an independent third party. There have been no substantial changes in the Company’s gap analyses or simulation analyses compared to the information provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010. Additional information and details are provided in the “Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity” section of “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond in a timely manner when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

An analysis was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

	Total	Average		Total Number of	Maximum Number (or
	Number of	Price Paid		Shares (or Units)	Approximate Dollar Value)
	Shares (or	per Share		Purchased as Part of	of Shares (or Units) that
	Units)	(or Units)		Publicly Announced	May Yet Be Purchased
Period	Purchased	Purchased		Plans or Programs	Under the Plans or Programs

Month #1 (January 1 - January 31, 2011)	—	$	—	—	76,776

Month #2 (February 1 - February 28, 2011)	—	—		—	76,776

Month #3 (March 1 - March 31, 2011)	—	—		—	76,776

On April 26, 2011, the Board of Directors extended the previously approved authorization to repurchase up to 197,000 shares, or approximately 5%, of the outstanding shares of the Company for an additional year to April 30, 2012. To date, there have been 120,224 shares repurchased under this plan.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other Information

None

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

(3) (i)		Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).
(3) (ii)		Bylaws of the Registrant’s as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 17, 2005).
(31) (i)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
(31) (ii)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
(32) (i)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
(32) (ii)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
	(Registrant)


Date: May 10, 2011	/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
	Richard A. Grafmyre, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: May 10, 2011	/s/ Brian L. Knepp
	Brian L. Knepp, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 31(i)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer