UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨
Check the appropriate box:
|
¨
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
¨
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
x
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
¨
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
¨
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
¨
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
| |
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:
|
| |
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:
|
|
| |
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
| |
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:
|
|
|
¨
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
¨
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
| |
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
| |
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC.
802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200
Bentonville, Arkansas 72712
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be held September 14, 2012
To the holders of common stock of America’s Car-Mart, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of stockholders of America’s Car-Mart, Inc., a Texas corporation, will be held at the Company’s principal executive office, 802 Southeast Plaza Avenue, Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712, on Friday, September 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:
|
|
(1)
|
To elect six directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified;
|
|
|
(2)
|
To consider and approve an advisory resolution regarding the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers;
|
|
|
(3)
|
To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013; and
|
|
|
(4)
|
To conduct such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 23, 2012 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
| |
Very truly yours,
|
| |
/s/ William H. Henderson
|
| |
William H. Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
|
July 27, 2012
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, you are urged to complete, sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy in the accompanying return envelope to which no postage need be affixed if mailed within the United States.
AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC.
802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200
Bentonville, Arkansas 72712
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD
SEPTEMBER 14, 2012
Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references in this proxy statement to "we," "us" and "our" refer to America’s Car-Mart, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2012
This proxy statement and our 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K, are available at www.car-mart.com (http://www.car-mart.com/ir/2012_Proxy.pdf).
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
This proxy statement, which is first being mailed to stockholders on or about August 13, 2012, is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of our board of directors for use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the Company’s principal executive office, 802 Southeast Plaza Avenue, Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712, on Friday, September 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and at any or all adjournments or postponements thereof. To receive directions to the annual meeting, please call (479) 464-9944. The address of our principal executive offices is 802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 and our telephone number is (479) 464-9944.
|
Any person giving a proxy pursuant to this proxy statement may revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the annual meeting of stockholders by notifying, in writing, our Secretary at the address above prior to the annual meeting date. In addition, if the person executing the proxy is present at the annual meeting, he or she may, but need not, revoke the proxy by notice of such revocation to our Secretary at the annual meeting, and vote his or her shares in person. Proxies in the form enclosed, if duly signed and received in time for voting, and not so revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. Where no choice is specified, proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of the nominees for director named in the proxy statement, “FOR” the resolution approving the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers, “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, and, on any other matters presented for a vote, in accordance with the judgment of the persons acting under the proxies.
|
Please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card promptly in the enclosed addressed envelope even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. Postage need not be affixed to the envelope if mailed within the United States. The immediate return of your proxy card will be of great assistance in preparing for the annual meeting and is, therefore, urgently requested. If you attend the annual meeting and vote in person, your proxy card will not be used.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on July 23, 2012 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Each share of our common stock issued and outstanding on such record date is entitled to one vote. As of July 23, 2012, we had 9,221,772 shares of common stock outstanding.
The presence at the annual meeting of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date is necessary to constitute a quorum. Stockholders will be counted as present at the annual meeting if they are present in person at the annual meeting or if they have properly submitted a proxy card. A plurality of the votes duly cast is required for the election of directors. The proposals regarding the advisory vote on executive compensation and the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on, and that vote for or against or expressly abstain with respect to, the proposals.
Any abstaining votes and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present and entitled to vote, and therefore will be included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the annual meeting. Abstentions will be treated as “votes cast” on certain matters, but broker “non-votes” will not be deemed to be “votes cast.” As a result, broker “non-votes” will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results on the election of directors and the other proposals presented in this proxy statement, and therefore will not have any effect on such votes. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Abstentions will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results on the election of directors, and therefore will not have any effect on such vote, but will have the same effect as a vote against the proposals regarding the advisory vote on executive compensation and the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, referred to in this proxy statement as the Dodd-Frank Act, directed national securities exchanges to prohibit broker discretionary voting of uninstructed shares held in “street name” (through a broker or nominee) for the election of directors, executive compensation and certain other matters. Under current stock exchange rules, broker discretionary voting is not permitted for the election of directors and executive compensation matters. Therefore, if you hold shares through a broker or other nominee and you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, including regarding the election of directors and the advisory vote on our executive compensation, your shares may not be voted on those matters and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval.
We will bear the entire cost of the proxy solicitation, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement, the proxy card and any additional materials furnished to stockholders. Individual stockholders of record will receive copies of the proxy solicitation materials even if they share the same mailing address. Copies of proxy solicitation materials will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. In addition, we may reimburse such persons for their cost of forwarding the solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by one or more of telephone, e-mail, facsimile or personal solicitation by our directors, officers or regular employees. No additional compensation will be paid for such services. We have not engaged, and do not plan to engage, the services of a professional proxy solicitation firm to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. Our costs for such services, if any, will not be material.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information as of July 23, 2012 with respect to ownership of our outstanding common stock by (i) all persons known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors and nominees for director, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
|
|
|
Percent of
Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
William M. Sams
|
|
631,250(2)
|
|
|
6.8%
|
|
|
Opus Capital Group, LLC
|
|
562,428(3)
|
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
Royce & Associates, LLC
|
|
539,800(4)
|
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
504,758(5)
|
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
William H. Henderson
|
|
392,619(6)
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
Eddie L. Hight
|
|
241,447(7)
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
Daniel J. Englander
|
|
206,615(8)
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Williams
|
|
151,426(9)
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
John David Simmons
|
|
54,979(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert Cameron Smith
|
|
16,300(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
1,694,636(12)
|
|
|
17.1%
|
|
_____________________________________
| |
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1% of outstanding shares.
|
| |
|
|
(1)
|
|
"Beneficial ownership" includes shares for which an individual, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or investment power, or both, and also includes options that are exercisable within 60 days of July 23, 2012. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the listed persons have sole voting and investment power over the shares listed opposite their names. Beneficial ownership as reported in the above table has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to in this proxy statement as the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to in this proxy statement as the SEC, certain shares of our common stock that a beneficial owner has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the exercise of stock options or warrants are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such owner, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Applicable percentages are based on 9,922,022 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on July 23, 2012, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC.
|
| |
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 31,250 shares which Mr. Sams has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options and 100,000 shares held by a corporation controlled by Mr. Sams.
|
| |
|
|
(3)
|
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 23, 2011 by Opus Capital Group, LLC with an address of 1 West Fourth Street, Suite 2500, Cincinnati, OH 45202. The reporting person reported beneficial ownership of 562,428 shares for which it has sole voting power over 100,504 shares and sole dispositive power over 562,428 shares. We make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information reported.
|
| |
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 6, 2012 by Royce & Associates, LLC with an address of 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151. The reporting person reported beneficial ownership of 539,800 shares for which it has sole voting power over 539,800 shares and sole dispositive power over 539,800 shares. We make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information reported.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 20, 2012 by BlackRock, Inc. with an address of 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022. The reporting person reported beneficial ownership of 504,758 shares for which it has sole voting power over 504,758 shares and sole dispositive power over 504,758 shares. We make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information reported.
|
| |
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 300,000 shares which Mr. Henderson has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options, 1,874 shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 750 shares held as custodian for minor children.
|
| |
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 174,000 shares which Mr. Hight has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options and 90 shares held as a custodian for a minor child.
|
| |
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 155,165 shares held in a limited partnership of which Mr. Englander is the sole general partner and 23,750 shares which Mr. Englander has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options.
|
| |
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 120,000 shares which Mr. Williams has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options, 2,013 shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1,812 shares held in the Company’s 401(k) Plan.
|
| |
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 38,750 shares which Mr. Simmons has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options.
|
| |
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 12,500 shares which Mr. Smith has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding stock options and 250 shares held by Mr. Smith’s spouse.
|
| |
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 700,250 shares which all current executive officers and directors in the aggregate have the right to acquire within 60 days of July 23, 2012 upon exercise of outstanding options.
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to our bylaws, our board of directors has set the number of directors for the ensuing year at six, all of whom are proposed to be elected at the annual meeting of stockholders. In the event any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the annual meeting, the persons named as proxies therein will have discretionary authority to vote the proxies for the election of such person or persons as may be nominated in substitution by the present board of directors, upon the recommendation of the nominating committee of the board of directors. Management knows of no current circumstances that would render any nominee named herein unable to accept nomination for election. Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election at the annual meeting at which a quorum is present.
Members of our board of directors are elected annually to serve until the next annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. The following persons have been nominated for election to our board of directors:
Daniel J. Englander, age 43, has served as a director since February 2007. Mr. Englander is the founder and currently the Managing Partner of Ursula Investors, an investment partnership founded in 2004. From January 2005 to June 2006, Mr. Englander was a partner of Prescott Securities, an investment fund, and from October 1994 to January 2005, he was employed by Allen & Company, an investment merchant bank, most recently as Managing Director. Mr. Englander is also currently on the board of directors of Copart, Inc. Mr. Englander’s qualifications to serve on the board include his financial and investment experience. He also brings operational and strategic expertise, as well as business development expertise to the board.
William H. Henderson, age 49, has served as a director since September 2002. Mr. Henderson has also served as our Chief Executive Officer since October 2007 and as our President since May 2002. From 1999 until May 2002, Mr. Henderson served as Chief Operating Officer of our wholly owned operating subsidiary. From 1992 until 1998, Mr. Henderson served as General Manager of our wholly owned operating subsidiary. From 1987 until 1992, Mr. Henderson primarily held positions of District Manager and Regional Manager of our wholly owned operating subsidiary. Mr. Henderson’s qualifications to serve on the board include his more than 20 years of experience with our company and his in-depth knowledge of our company and its operations. In addition, Mr. Henderson provides significant industry experience and expertise to the board.
William M. Sams, age 74, has served as a director since March 2005. Mr. Sams currently manages his personal investments and is a general partner of Marlin Sams Fund, L.P. From 1981 until 2000, Mr. Sams was the President and Chief Investment Officer of FPA Paramount Fund, Inc., as well as Executive Vice President of both First Pacific Advisors and FPA Perennial Fund, Inc. He started his career in 1966 in the mutual fund industry. Mr. Sams is also currently on the board of directors of Unifi, Inc. Mr. Sams’ qualifications to serve on the board include his finance and investment experience and expertise.
John David Simmons, age 76, has served as a director since August 1986. Since 1970, Mr. Simmons has been President of Simmons & Associates LLC, a real estate development company, and Management Resource LLC, a management consulting firm. Mr. Simmons has more than 40 years of experience in the automotive field and has been a new car dealer for Ford and General Motors as well as owning a number of “Buy Here Pay Here” dealerships. Mr. Simmons’ qualifications to serve on the board include his demonstrated leadership and knowledge of financial, operational and strategic issues facing the automotive dealership industry. In addition, Mr. Simmons provides management and real estate expertise to the board.
Robert Cameron Smith, 61, has served as a director since December 2009. Mr. Smith is the founder and President of Cameron Smith & Associates, Inc., an executive recruiting firm located in Bentonville, Arkansas that he founded in 1994. He has 20 years of experience in executive searching, beginning with Career Consultants in Southern California before starting his own agency in Los Angeles, California. He has become a leader in the retail supplier community, and is actively involved in efforts to enhance the technology, international trade opportunities and higher education resources available to world-class companies working in conjunction with major retailers. Mr. Smith’s qualifications to serve on the board include his recruiting and management selection expertise.
Jeffrey A. Williams, 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Finance and Secretary of the Company since October 2005 and as a director since August 2011. Mr. Williams is a Certified Public Accountant and prior to joining the Company, his experience included approximately seven years in public accounting with Arthur Andersen & Co. and Coopers and Lybrand LLC in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Dallas, Texas. His experience also includes approximately five years as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations of Wynco, LLC, a nationwide distributor of animal health products. Mr. Williams' qualifications to serve on the Board include his financial and operational experience.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR each of the six nominees to our board of directors.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Under the Dodd-Frank Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company’s stockholders are now entitled to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.
At the 2011 Annual Meeting, the Company held its first non-binding stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation and received a strong shareholder vote (83% affirmative) approving the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. At the 2011 Annual Meeting, the stockholders also recommended in an advisory vote to hold future say-on-pay votes on an annual basis. As such, the Board of Directors has determined to hold this advisory vote on the compensation of named executive officers each year. The next advisory vote to determine the frequency with which stockholders will consider and approve an advisory vote on the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers will be in 2017.
Accordingly, the board of directors is seeking the advisory vote of stockholders on the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (collectively, our “named executive officers”) as disclosed in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives the Company’s stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers.
In fiscal 2012, the Company’s named executive officers made and effectively managed the execution of key business and strategic decisions that helped the Company achieve strong financial results. In fiscal 2012, the Company increased revenues by 13.4% to over $430 million, increased diluted earnings per share by 28% to $3.24 and opened eight new dealerships. These accomplishments were especially significant given the slow recovery and the threat of continued volatility in the U.S. and global economies.
As discussed in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below, we have designed our executive compensation program to attract and retain the highest quality executive officers, directly link pay to performance, and build value for our stockholders. The program provides total compensation opportunities at levels that are competitive in our industries, ties a significant portion of each executive’s compensation to his or her individual performance and contribution to achieving our business objectives, and closely aligns the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders. Accordingly, the board of directors encourages you to review carefully the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular and other disclosures on compensation under Executive Compensation, and asks you to cast a vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers through the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.”
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the compensation committee or the board of directors. The board and compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The audit committee has appointed Grant Thornton LLP as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of our company for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013. Grant Thornton LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
A representative of Grant Thornton LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting of stockholders, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions that stockholders may have.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were as follows:
| |
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Audit Fees
|
$
|
269,006
|
$
|
268,269
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
All other Fees
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Total Fees
|
$
|
269,006
|
$
|
268,269
|
The audit fees for the years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 were for the audits of our annual financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K, the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and consents for and review of other documents filed with the SEC.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Services of Independent Auditors
Our audit committee has established policies and procedures regarding pre-approval of all services provided by our independent auditor. Our audit committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by our independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the audit committee. Unless a type of service has received general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by our audit committee if it is to be provided by our independent auditor. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, our audit committee pre-approved all audit and permitted non-audit services that were provided to us by our independent auditors.
Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Although stockholder ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013 is being submitted to our stockholders for ratification because we believe it is a matter of good corporate governance. In the event our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013, the adverse vote will be considered as a recommendation to the audit committee to select other auditors for the following fiscal year. However, due to the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors after the beginning of the fiscal year, it is contemplated that the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013 will be permitted to stand unless the audit committee finds other good reason for making a change. The audit committee may terminate Grant Thornton LLP’s engagement as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm without the approval of our stockholders if it deems termination appropriate and in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Meetings of the Board of Directors
During our last fiscal year, our board of directors held four meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held by the board of directors and by the committees of the board of directors on which such director served.
It is the policy of our board of directors that all directors should attend the annual meeting of stockholders unless unavoidably prevented from doing so by unforeseen circumstances. All directors attended the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.
Board Independence
Our board of directors currently consists of six members. Our board of directors has determined that Daniel J. Englander, William M. Sams, John David Simmons and Robert Cameron Smith are “independent” as defined by the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, referred to in this proxy statement as NASDAQ. Our independent directors meet separately at least twice each year.
Board Leadership Structure
Currently Mr. Henderson serves as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Simmons serves as the lead director of the board. The board of directors currently believes that this leadership structure is advantageous because it allows Mr. Henderson to focus on the management of our business and our day-to-day operations. However, the board of directors does not have a policy that requires that the positions of lead director and Chief Executive Officer be held by different people. The board of directors believes that this gives it the flexibility to determine that one person should hold both positions if such leadership structure would be in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The audit committee reviews and discusses with management our processes and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. In addition, our risk oversight process involves the board receiving information from management on a variety of matters, including operations, legal, regulatory, finance, reputation and strategy, as well as information regarding any material risks associated with each matter. The full board (or the appropriate board committee, if the board committee is responsible for the oversight of the matter) receives this information through updates from the appropriate members of management to enable it to understand and monitor the company’s risk management practices. When a board committee receives an update the chairperson of the relevant board committee reports on the discussion to the full board during the next board meeting. This enables the board and the board committees to coordinate the risk oversight role.
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has implemented a process for stockholders to send communications to our board of directors. Any stockholder desiring to communicate with our board of directors, or with specific individual directors, may do so by writing to our Secretary at 802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712. Our Secretary has been instructed by our board of directors to promptly forward all such communications to our board of directors or such individual directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors presently has three standing committees: audit committee, compensation and stock option committee, referred to in this proxy statement as the compensation committee, and nominating committee. Each of these committees is described below.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee assists our board of directors in overseeing our accounting and financial reporting process and audits for our financial statements. It is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our registered public accounting firm. Our audit committee reviews the auditing accountant’s audit of our financial statements and its report thereon, management’s report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting, various other accounting and auditing matters and the independence of the auditing accountants. The committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by our auditing accountants, or other accounting firms, other than as may be allowed by applicable law. Our audit committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting and auditing matters. Our audit committee meets with management to review any issues related to matters within the scope of the audit committee’s duties. The committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our board of directors, which may be found on our website at www.car-mart.com.
Our audit committee presently consists of William M. Sams, John David Simmons and Daniel J. Englander, Chairman, each of whom is “independent,” as such term is defined by the NASDAQ’s listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. In addition, the board has determined that each audit committee member is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and, other than strictly in his capacity as a member of our board of directors or a committee of our board of directors, has not participated in preparing our financial statements in any of the past three years. Our board of directors has determined that Daniel J. Englander is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC. Our audit committee held four meetings during the last fiscal year. See “Audit Committee Report” for additional information regarding our audit committee.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee presently consists of William M. Sams, Daniel J. Englander and Robert Cameron Smith, Chairman, each of whom the board of directors has determined to be “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards. In addition, all compensation committee members are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and also “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Our compensation committee assists our board of directors with respect to our compensation programs and compensation of our executive officers and is authorized to administer our equity and non-equity incentive plans. Our compensation committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our board of directors, which may be found on our website at www.car-mart.com. Our compensation committee held one meeting during the last fiscal year. See “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Role of Compensation Committee” for additional information.
Nominating Committee
Our nominating committee presently consists of our current independent board members, Daniel J. Englander, William M. Sams, John David Simmons and Robert Cameron Smith. Our nominating committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by our board of directors, which may be found on our website at www.car-mart.com. Nominees for election to our board of directors are considered and recommended by our nominating committee. Our full board of directors considers the recommendations of the nominating committee and recommends the nominees to our stockholders. Our nominating committee’s process for identifying and evaluating potential nominees includes soliciting recommendations from our directors and officers and considering nominations from our stockholders. Absent special circumstances, our nominating committee will continue to nominate qualified incumbent directors whom the nominating committee believes will continue to make important contributions to our board of directors. While there are no minimum qualifications for nomination, our nominating committee generally requires that nominees be persons of sound ethical character, be able to represent all stockholders fairly, have no material conflicts of interest, have demonstrated professional achievement, have meaningful experience and have a general appreciation of the major issues facing us. In addition, the board of directors believes that it, as a whole, should possess a combination of skills, professional experience and diversity of backgrounds necessary to oversee our business. In seeking a diversity of background, the nominating committee seeks a variety of occupational and personal backgrounds in order to obtain a range of viewpoints and perspectives. Accordingly, the nominating committee considers the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually and in the broader context of the board’s overall composition and our current and future needs. In evaluating nominees, and considering incumbent directors for nomination, the nominating committee has considered all of the criteria described above and the nominating committee believes that all of the six director nominees listed above are highly qualified and have the skills and experience required for service on our board of directors. The biographies above contain specific information regarding the experiences, qualifications and skills of each of our director nominees. Our nominating committee held one meeting during the last fiscal year.
Stockholder Nominations
Our nominating committee will consider persons recommended by our stockholders in selecting nominees for election. Our nominating committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by stockholders because it believes that it can adequately evaluate any such nominee on a case-by-case basis. However, our nominating committee would consider for possible nomination qualified nominees recommended by stockholders. Stockholders who wish to propose a qualified nominee for consideration should submit complete information as to the identity and qualifications of that person to our Secretary at 802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712. See “Stockholder Proposals” for information regarding the procedures that must be followed by stockholders in order to submit stockholder proposals, including proposals to nominate director candidates.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been one of our officers or employees. There are no compensation committee interlocks and no insider participation in compensation decisions that are required to be disclosed in this proxy statement.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all employees, including executive officers and directors. A copy of our code was filed as Exhibit 14.1 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004. In the event that we make any amendments to, or grant any waiver from, a provision of the code that requires disclosure under applicable SEC or NASDAQ rules, we will disclose such amendment or waiver and the reasons for such amendment or waiver as required.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock to file with the SEC reports of changes in ownership of our common stock held by such persons. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are also required to furnish us with copies of all forms they file under Section 16(a). To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied on a timely basis with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them, except for as follows: one Form 4 “Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership” report for John David Simmons, reporting two transactions, was filed late.
Director Compensation Table
The following table provides certain information concerning compensation for each director during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. Mr. Henderson and Mr. Williams, who are members of our board of directors, have been omitted from this table since they received no compensation for serving on our board of directors.
|
Name
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)1, 2
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
|
Daniel J. Englander
|
$55,000
|
|
$92,588
|
|
|
|
$147,588
|
|
William M. Sams
|
$38,000
|
|
$92,588
|
|
|
|
$130,588
|
|
John David Simmons
|
$40,500
|
|
$92,588
|
|
|
|
$133,088
|
|
Robert Cameron Smith
|
$38,000
|
|
$92,588
|
|
|
|
$130,588
|
|
William A. Swanston3
|
$6,000
|
|
$92,588
|
|
|
|
$98,588
|
___________________
| |
1
|
In accordance with SEC rules, the amount shown reflects the grant date fair value of stock options granted during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012 calculated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Refer to “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note K: Stock-Based Compensation Plans” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on June 14, 2012 for the relevant assumptions used to determine the valuation of our option awards.
|
| |
2
|
The following are the aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by each of our director as of April 30, 2012: Mr. Englander- 18,750; Mr. Sams – 26,250; Mr. Simmons – 33,750 and Mr. Smith – 7,500.
|
| |
3
|
Mr. Swanston passed away on June 15, 2011.
|
Discussion of Director Compensation
Effective November 1, 2011, each non-employee director receives a $40,000 annual retainer. The lead director receives an additional $5,000 annual retainer and the chairman of our audit committee receives an additional $10,000 annual retainer. Directors who are also our employees do not receive separate compensation for their services as a director. On the first business day of May in each year, each of our then serving non-employee directors is automatically granted an option under our Option Plan to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock. These options are issued at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. These options are vested upon grant and are exercisable for a period of up to ten years from the date of grant or, in the event that a director ceases to be one of our directors for any reason, one year following the date on which such director ceased to be a director, if earlier.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation philosophy is to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and induce our executive officers to remain in our employ. We believe that this is best accomplished by the following:
|
·
|
paying executives a base salary commensurate with their backgrounds, industry knowledge, special skill sets and responsibilities;
|
|
·
|
offering incentive cash bonuses conditioned on our consolidated financial results; and
|
|
·
|
making periodic grants of restricted stock and/or stock options.
|
Our overall goal is to ensure that our executive compensation program and policies are consistent with our strategic business objectives and that we provide incentives for the attainment of those objectives. We strive to accomplish this goal in the context of a compensation program that includes annual base salary, annual cash incentives and stock ownership.
Role of Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee retains broad flexibility in the administration of our executive compensation program. We believe this flexibility is critical to retaining key executives. Our compensation committee is focused on ensuring that executive compensation is directly tied to our economic performance.
Our compensation committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors. Our compensation committee has several duties and responsibilities, including the following:
|
·
|
establish and review our overall executive compensation philosophy;
|
|
·
|
review and approve our goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, including annual performance objectives;
|
|
·
|
on an annual basis, review the compensation and performance of our officers, review and approve corporate goals relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, evaluate our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of these goals and objectives, evaluate the performance of our other executive officers, and based on such evaluation, approve the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;
|
|
·
|
review the annual compensation discussion and analysis and produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement, in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations;
|
|
·
|
as requested by our board of directors, make recommendations to our board of directors with respect to the approval of incentive compensation plans and equity-based incentive plans, and administer such plans;
|
|
·
|
periodically review the policies and criteria for the administration of all executive compensation programs, the operations of the compensation programs and whether they are achieving their intended purposes;
|
|
·
|
monitor compliance by executives with the terms and conditions of our executive compensation plans and programs;
|
|
·
|
establish and periodically review policies in the area of senior management perquisites;
|
|
·
|
review board of director compensation levels and practices periodically, and recommend to our board of directors, from time to time, changes in such compensation levels and practices;
|
|
·
|
review and approve plans and processes for management development and succession; and
|
|
·
|
periodically review and reassess the adequacy of the compensation committee charter and recommend any proposed changes to our board of directors for approval.
|
For additional information on the duties and responsibilities of our compensation committee, see our compensation committee charter available on our website at www.car-mart.com.
Compensation Process
Our compensation committee reviews and administers our compensation program for each of our named executive officers. Compensation is typically set at multi-year increments in order to help ensure that longer-term results are the primary focus, which we believe is critically important in our industry. Our compensation committee periodically meets with our Chief Executive Officer, who provides insight into how individual executives are performing.
Consideration of 2011 Stockholder Say on Pay Vote
At the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers (83% of votes cast), and voted for approval of an annual frequency for future advisory votes with respect to named executive officer compensation (78% of votes cast). The Compensation Committee believes this level of stockholder support reflects a strong endorsement of the Company’s compensation policies and decisions. The Compensation Committee has considered the results of this advisory vote on executive compensation in determining the Company’s compensation policies and decisions for 2012, and has determined that these policies and decisions are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders at this time. In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors has considered the stockholder vote and management’s recommendation regarding the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and has adopted the stockholders’ recommendation of an annual advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers until the next required vote on this matter to be held in 2017, or until the Board of Directors otherwise determines that a different frequency for such advisory votes is in the best interests of the stockholders of the Company.
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with all of our named executive officers. We believe that the employment agreements, which include change-in-control provisions, are necessary to attract and retain executives in light of all relevant factors, which include each officer’s past employment experience, desired terms and conditions of employment, and the strategic importance of their respective positions. We believe that the change-in-control provisions are necessary to maintain stability among our executive group and that the terms of such provisions are reasonable based on our review of similar provisions for similar companies. Our compensation committee reviews the employment agreements at the time such agreements are entered into in order to determine current market terms for the particular executive and agreement. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” and “Executive Compensation – Change in Control Agreements” for a discussion of the terms of the employment agreements.
Total Compensation and Elements of Compensation
Our principal focus is on total compensation, a significant portion of which is based on each executive’s performance and is not guaranteed. Although we do informally review what other companies within our industry or other companies of comparable size, growth, performance and complexity are offering to their executives, we believe the appropriate level of compensation is determined through careful consideration of the individual employee and our business goals. We consider a variety of factors in determining the total compensation for our named executive officers, including their backgrounds, industry knowledge, special skill sets and responsibilities.
Our executive compensation program primarily consists of base salary, annual short-term incentives in the form of cash awards, and long-term incentives in the form of restricted stock and/or stock options. We also provide certain of our named executive officers with minimal perquisites and personal benefits. In addition, we provide our named executive officers with the ability to contribute a portion of their earnings to our 401(k) plan. Our 401(k) plan is available generally to all of our employees.
We offer what we believe to be competitive base salaries to our named executive officers. The base salary must be sufficient to attract talented executives and provide a secure base of cash compensation. Due to the relatively small size of our industry and the non-existence of public competitors, we have not engaged in any formal compensation benchmarking studies; however, our base salary levels for our named executive officers are generally set to be competitive in relation to salary levels of executive officers in other companies within our industry or other companies of comparable size, growth, performance and complexity, while also taking into consideration the executive officer’s position, responsibility and special expertise. Annual base salary increases, typically determined in May of each year, are not assured and adjustments to base salary take into account subjective factors such as the executive’s performance during the prior year, responsibilities and experience. During fiscal 2012, Mr. Henderson received a 26% increase in base salary to $440,000. In fiscal 2011, Mr. Henderson received a 16.7% increase in base salary to $350,000. During fiscal 2012, Mr. Hight and Mr. Williams received a 32% increase in base salary to $330,000 each. In fiscal 2011, Mr. Hight and Mr. Williams received an 18.9% and 22.2% increase, respectively, in base salary to $250,000. These increases were made in accordance with the amendments to the employment agreements entered into in November 2009. The factors considered in deciding to grant these increases included performance of the Company in the prior fiscal year, their direct contributions to the increased profitability of the Company, increased experience and specialized industry knowledge as well as compensation levels the compensation committee considered to be appropriate to remain generally competitive with similar sized public companies. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” for a discussion of the terms of the employment agreements, as amended.
Economic Profit
Prior to fiscal year 2011, the performance criteria for our named executive officers for their short-term and long-term incentive compensation was economic profit per share, as opposed to profit under generally accepted accounting principles, referred to in this proxy statement as GAAP. We define economic profit per share as net operating profit after taxes minus the cost of capital (after tax) necessary to generate those profits, divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding. Economic profits are realized only if actual financial results exceed the cost of capital to generate those profits. Economic profit is neither calculated in accordance with, nor should it be considered an alternative to, GAAP. However, we believe that maximizing economic profit is important in creating long-term stockholder value and that it provides our stockholders with another meaningful tool to evaluate our performance. Economic profit was $1.30 per diluted share in fiscal 2010 compared to a revised budget of $.81 per diluted share (60.5% above budget). The initial economic profit budget for fiscal 2010 was $.68 per diluted share.
GAAP Earnings per Share
Effective for fiscal 2011 through fiscal 2015 and for an additional short-term cash incentive granted to our named executive officers for fiscal 2010, the performance criteria for our named executive officers for their short-term and a portion of their long-term incentive compensation is fully diluted GAAP earnings per share. Because we have fully instituted measures to better monitor operating results, including economic profits, and significant infrastructure investments have been made and have become a standard part of our operations over the last three years, the compensation committee decided to use fully diluted GAAP earnings per share as the measure for incentive compensation. Using fully diluted GAAP earnings per share will directly align the goals of our named executive officers with our stockholders. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” for a discussion of the terms of the employment agreements and the performance criteria for each named executive officer.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
Our short-term incentive plans for our named executive officers, which are contained in their employment agreements, are intended to drive short-term operating and financial results deemed crucial to our long-term term success. Our program entails granting annual cash incentive bonuses which are dependent on our performance. The purpose of the annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our named executive officers is to reflect the breadth of their experience and responsibility, and to make the cash component of their compensation competitive. These cash incentive bonuses are a material portion of the named executive officers’ overall compensation. All such cash incentive bonuses are subject to our compensation committee’s discretion to award cash incentives greater than the target if deemed appropriate. Our compensation committee also administers the calculation of amounts earned under the short-term incentive plans.
For fiscal 2010, the performance criteria for our short-term incentive plans for our named executive officers were based on attaining certain levels of economic profit per diluted share. Target payments typically ranged from 10% to 20% of base salary, depending on the named executive officer’s position and our performance as related to our economic profit per share goals. Our compensation committee set the awards for each named executive officer based on the duration of employment with us, job responsibilities, industry knowledge, special skills and performance. The performance goals are set at levels that our compensation committee considers attainable, but not assured, and representative of solid operating and financial performance within our industry. Our compensation committee revised the initial target levels set for the performance goals twice for fiscal 2010 (after the completion of fiscal 2008 and again at the completion of fiscal 2009).
For fiscal 2010, the compensation committee added an additional short-term incentive bonus for the named executive officers based on the attainment of a specific target for fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $2.20 for fiscal 2010. Actual fully diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2010 was $2.27 and, as a result, Mr. Henderson received an additional cash incentive bonus of $60,000, Mr. Hight received an additional cash incentive bonus of $36,000 and Mr. Williams received an additional cash incentive bonus of $30,000.
Effective for fiscal 2011 through fiscal 2015, the performance criteria for our short-term incentive plans for our named executive officers is fully diluted GAAP earnings per share. Target payments range from 19% to 70% of base salary, depending on the named executive officer’s position and our performance as related to our fully diluted GAAP earnings per share goals. Our compensation committee set the awards for each named executive officer based on the duration of employment with us, job responsibilities, industry knowledge, special skills and performance. The performance goals are set at levels that our compensation committee considers attainable, but not assured, and representative of solid operating and financial performance within our industry. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” for a discussion of the performance criteria for each named executive officer.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Our compensation objective of inducing executives to remain in our employ as well as aligning their interests with those of our stockholders leads us to make periodic equity awards. These awards provide incentives for our named executive officers to remain with us over the long term and gives the compensation committee additional flexibility to reward superior performance by our named executive officers. We believe that dependence on equity for a significant portion of a named executive officer’s compensation more closely aligns such executive’s interests with those of our stockholders, since the ultimate value of such compensation is linked directly to our stock price.
We utilize our two equity incentive plans for our long-term incentive compensation, the 2007 Stock Option Plan, referred to in this proxy statement as the Option Plan, and the Stock Incentive Plan, referred to in this proxy statement as the Incentive Plan. The allocation of long-term incentive compensation between stock options under the Option Plan and restricted stock under the Incentive Plan is generally made with the goal of rewarding long-term service with the issuance of restricted shares and rewarding efforts related to increasing the stock price over the long-term with the issuance of stock options. In fiscal 2008, stock options were granted to our named executive officers that were performance-based and, like our short-term incentive compensation, were to be earned by the named executive officer only if we met certain economic profit per share goals. Our compensation committee revised the initial target levels set for the performance goals twice for 2010 (after the completion of fiscal 2008 and again at the completion of fiscal 2009). These performance-based stock options vested at 100% on June 18, 2010 based on the attainment of the revised economic profit per share target. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” for a discussion of the performance criteria for the long-term incentive compensation of our named executive officers. In addition, in fiscal 2008, restricted stock awards that vested in equal installments at the end of each of fiscal year 2008, 2009 and 2010 were granted to Mr. Henderson and Mr. Hight.
In fiscal 2010, in connection with the amendments to the employment agreements of our named executive officers, our compensation committee granted the named executive officers restricted stock awards that vest upon the attainment of certain fully diluted GAAP earnings per share goals. See “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” for a discussion of the performance criteria for the long-term incentive compensation of our named executive officers. In addition, each of the named executive officers were granted stock options that vest in equal installments at the end of each of fiscal year 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
As discussed below under the section entitled “Executive Compensation - Employment Agreements,” we are prepared to issue significant equity awards to certain key executives as part of our strategy of providing meaningful long-term performance-based incentives for our management team in order to more closely align management’s interest with the interests of our stockholders.
Perquisites and Personal Benefits
Our named executive officers receive additional compensation consistent with our philosophy of hiring and retaining key personnel. Such perquisites include executive health insurance, automobile allowances, club dues and matching contributions to our 401(k) plan. See “Executive Compensation – Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2012” for the aggregate incremental cost to us during fiscal 2012 of such benefits. The Company in past years has also made certain cash payments to the executive officers pursuant to their employment agreements or on a discretionary basis to defray the income taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock. These amounts were known as tax gross-up payments. No tax gross up payments were paid during fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011, and the Company does not presently intend to make tax gross-up payments in the future related to the vesting of restricted stock. Tax gross-up amounts paid in fiscal 2010 were paid in accordance with the employment agreements.
Equity Ownership Guidelines
We have an ownership philosophy, rather than a formal policy, regarding equity ownership by our named executive officers. The objectives of our philosophy are to instill an ownership mindset among our senior management and to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. The long-term incentive compensation arrangements discussed above are intended to bring the beneficial ownership interests of our named executive officers more in line with our compensation committee’s ownership level expectations.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which provides that we may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to certain individuals, has not been a material consideration for our compensation committee due to the levels and types of compensation paid to our named executive officers.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
In accordance with recent SEC rule changes, stock-based compensation expense is computed in accordance with accounting rules that are a part of GAAP as set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The expense related to equity compensation has been and will continue to be a material consideration in our overall compensation program.
Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program
The compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the compensation and other benefits structure applicable to our employees generally. We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for our employees give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the following factors:
|
·
|
Our compensation program is designed to provide a combination of both fixed and variable incentive compensation.
|
|
·
|
The variable portions of compensation are designed to reward both annual performance and longer term performance. We believe this lessens any incentive for short-term risk taking that could be detrimental to our company’s long-term best interests.
|
|
·
|
A significant portion of our management’s compensation is based on the performance of our company as a whole.
|
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Years 2012, 2011, and 2010
The following table provides certain information concerning compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities by our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and one other executive officer during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
|
Name and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)1
|
Option
Award
($)1
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
|
All Other Compensation
($)2
|
Total
($)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
|
William H. Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
|
2012
2011
2010
|
$410,833
$350,000
$300,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
$244,700
|
-
-
$2,828,880
|
$182,875
$83,750
$120,000
|
-
-
-
|
$14,868
$16,491
$60,044
|
$608,576
$450,241
$3,553,624
|
|
Jeffrey A. Williams
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
2012
2011
2010
|
$307,500
$250,000
$204,626
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
$122,350
|
-
-
$1,414,440
|
$102,410
$46,900
$60,000
|
-
-
-
|
$21,703
$31,271
$26,545
|
$431,613
$328,171
$1,827,961
|
|
Eddie L. Hight
Chief Operating Officer
|
2012
2011
2010
|
$307,500
$250,000
$210,319
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
$122,350
|
-
-
$1,414,440
|
$102,410
$46,900
$72,000
|
-
-
-
|
$41,895
$50,102
$59,391
|
$451,805
$347,002
$1,878,500
|
_________________
1 In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown reflect grant date fair value of the awards calculated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation – Stock compensation. Refer to “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note K: Stock-Based Compensation Plans” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on June 14, 2012 for the relevant assumptions used to determine the valuation of our option awards. Performance based awards are reflected assuming the performance criteria are met and awards become 100% vested.
2 These amounts include matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, payment of insurance premiums, reimbursement of expenses under our executive health insurance plan, use of company automobile, payment of club dues and tax gross-ups to partially defray income taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock as follows: For fiscal 2012, Mr. Henderson - $3,100 for use of company automobile, $6,000 for club dues, $2,796 for matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, $1,492 for insurance premiums, $990 for Christmas bonus and $490 for reimbursement of expenses under our executive health insurance plan; Mr. Williams - $1,850 for use of company automobile, $6,000 for club dues, $1,262 for matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, $1,492 for insurance premiums, $560 for Christmas bonus and $10,539 for reimbursement of expenses under our executive health insurance plan; Mr. Hight - $2,350 for use of company automobile, $6,000 for club dues, $5,208 for matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, $1,492 for insurance premiums, $770 for Christmas bonus and $26,075 for reimbursement of expenses under our executive health insurance plan.
Our named executive officers are entitled to all benefits generally made available to our employees, including the eligibility to participate in our 401(k) plan. Our 401(k) plan is intended to be a tax-qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, referred to in this proxy statement as the Code. In general, all of our employees who are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan immediately upon hire. Our 401(k) plan includes a salary deferral arrangement pursuant to which the participants may contribute up to the maximum amount permitted by the Code. We may make both matching and additional contributions, subject to certain Code limitations, at the discretion of our board of directors. A separate account is maintained for each participant in our 401(k) plan. The portion of a participant’s account attributable to his or her own contributions is 100% vested. Distributions from our 401(k) plan may be made in the form of a lump sum cash payment or, for required minimum distribution, in installment payments.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards during Fiscal 2012
There were no grants of plan-based awards during fiscal year 2012.
Employment Agreements
In August 2007, we entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers and in November 2009, we entered into amendments to such employment agreements. The following is a discussion of the employment agreements related to the compensation earned by and paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2012 and the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015.
Each of the employment agreements with our named executive officers contains an agreement not to compete, which covers the term of employment and one year thereafter, a covenant against the solicitation of employees and customers, which covers the term of employment and one year thereafter, a provision against the use and disclosure of trade secrets, which covers the term of employment and an indefinite period thereafter, and a provision against the use and disclosure of confidential information, which covers the term of employment and two years thereafter.
William H. Henderson. Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement dated November 13, 2009, Mr. Henderson agreed to serve as a senior executive officer of our operating subsidiary for a term beginning May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2015. For fiscal 2012, Mr. Henderson was entitled to a base annual salary of $350,000, or such higher annual salary approved by our board of directors. Mr. Henderson has the right to participate in any operating subsidiary 401(k) profit sharing plan, as well as the medical and life insurance programs offered by our operating subsidiary.
In addition, pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Henderson is entitled to earn an annual incentive bonus during the term beginning May 1, 2010 and ending April 30, 2015. Such incentive bonus will be based upon the attainment of our projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share for each fiscal year. Mr. Henderson’s bonus potential is $125,000, $137,500, $151,250, $166,375 and $183,013 for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 95-99% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 0.67. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 100-104% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.0. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 105% or more of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.33. For fiscal 2012, Mr. Henderson earned a bonus of $182,875 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $3.24, which equaled 108% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $3.00. For fiscal 2011, Mr. Henderson earned a bonus of $83,750 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $2.54, which equaled 97% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $2.61.
Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Henderson also received 10,000 shares of restricted stock on November 27, 2009 pursuant to our Incentive Plan, which shares will vest on April 30, 2015 if we attain at least 70% of our cumulative projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share for the period commencing on May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Henderson also received, pursuant to our Option Plan, non-qualified stock options to purchase 240,000 shares of our common stock, which options vest in equal installments (48,000 options) on each of April 30, 2011, April 30, 2012, April 30, 2013, April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2015.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, if we terminate Mr. Henderson without cause (as defined in the employment agreement) and not in connection with a change in control, Mr. Henderson’s base salary will continue to be payable through the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Henderson will be paid, within 60 days after termination, the pro rata portion of any bonus earned through the date of termination, and all unvested restricted stock and stock options will immediately vest in full without regard to the achievement of any applicable performance goals. This provision has been in place in Mr. Henderson’s employment agreement since its inception in August 2007. Assuming Mr. Henderson was terminated on April 30, 2012, and using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94, the estimated payment amount would have been $5,341,720.
Eddie L. Hight. Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement dated November 13, 2009, Mr. Hight agreed to serve as a senior executive officer of our operating subsidiary for a term ending on April 30, 2015. Mr. Hight is entitled to a base annual salary of $250,000, or such higher annual salary approved by our board of directors. Mr. Hight has the right to participate in any operating subsidiary 401(k) profit sharing plan, as well as the medical and life insurance programs offered by our operating subsidiary.
In addition, pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Hight is entitled to earn an annual incentive bonus during the term beginning May 1, 2010 and ending April 30, 2015. Such incentive bonus will be based upon the attainment of our projected fully diluted GAAP earning per share for each fiscal year. Mr. Hight’s bonus potential is $70,000, $77,000, $84,700, $93,170 and $102,487 for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 95-99% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 0.67. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 100-104% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.0. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 105% or more of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.33. For fiscal 2012, Mr. Hight earned a bonus of $102,410 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $3.24, which equaled 108% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $3.00. For fiscal 2011, Mr. Hight earned a bonus of $46,900 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $2.54, which equaled 97% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $2.61.
Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Hight also received 5,000 shares of restricted stock on November 27, 2009 pursuant to our Incentive Plan, which shares will vest on April 30, 2015 if we attain at least 70% of our cumulative projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share for the period commencing on May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Hight also received, pursuant to our Option Plan, non-qualified stock options to purchase 120,000 shares of our common stock, in which options vest in equal installments (24,000 options) on each of April 30, 2011, April 30, 2012, April 30, 2013, April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2015.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, if we terminate Mr. Hight without cause and not in connection with a change in control, Mr. Hight’s base salary will continue to be payable through the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Hight will be paid, within 60 days after termination, the pro rata portion of any bonus earned through the date of termination, and all unvested restricted stock and stock options will immediately vest in full without regard to the achievement of any applicable performance goals. This provision has been in place in Mr. Hight’s employment agreement since its inception in August 2007. Assuming Mr. Hight was terminated on April 30, 2012, and using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94, the estimated payment amount would have been $3,000,860.
Jeffrey A. Williams. Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement dated November 13, 2009, Mr. Williams agreed to serve as a senior executive officer of our operating subsidiary for a term ending on April 30, 2015. Mr. Williams is entitled to an annual salary of $250,000, or such higher annual salary approved by our board of directors. Mr. Williams has the right to participate in any operating subsidiary 401(k) profit sharing plan, as well as the medical and life insurance programs offered by our operating subsidiary.
In addition, pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Williams is entitled to earn an annual incentive bonus during the term beginning May 1, 2010 and ending April 30, 2015. Such incentive bonus will be based upon the attainment of our projected fully diluted GAAP earning per share for each fiscal year. Mr. Williams’ bonus potential is $70,000, $77,000, $84,700, $93,170 and $102,487 for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 95-99% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 0.67. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 100-104% of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.0. If our actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share equals 105% or more of the projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share, the bonus for each fiscal year will be the bonus potential for such year multiplied by 1.33. For fiscal 2012, Mr. Williams earned a bonus of $102,410 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $3.24, which equaled 108% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $3.00. For fiscal 2011, Mr. Williams earned a bonus of $46,900 based upon the actual fully diluted GAAP earnings per share of $2.54, which equaled 97% of our projected fully diluted earnings per share of $2.61.
Pursuant to the amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Williams also received 5,000 shares of restricted stock on November 27, 2009 pursuant to our Incentive Plan, which shares will vest on April 30, 2015 if we attain at least 70% of our cumulative projected GAAP earnings per share for the period commencing on May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Williams also received, pursuant to our Option Plan, non-qualified stock options to purchase 120,000 shares of our common stock, which options vest in equal installments (24,000 options) on each of April 30, 2011, April 30, 2012, April 30, 2013, April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2015.
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as amended, if we terminate Mr. Williams without cause and not in connection with a change in control, Mr. Williams’ base salary will continue to be payable through the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Williams will be paid, within 60 days after termination, the pro rata portion of any bonus earned through the date of termination, and all unvested restricted stock and stock options will immediately vest in full without regard to the achievement of any applicable performance goals. This provision has been in place in Mr. Williams’ employment agreement since its inception in August 2007. Assuming Mr. Williams was terminated on April 30, 2012, and using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94, the estimated payment amount would have been $3,000,860.
Stock Plans
2007 Stock Option Plan. In August 2007, our board of directors adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan, referred to in this proxy statement as the Option Plan, which was subsequently approved by our stockholders at our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders. The Option Plan originally set aside 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for option grants to employees, directors and certain independent contractors, consultants and advisors at a price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant or the par value per share of our common stock. Our stockholders approved an amendment to the Option Plan on October 13, 2010 to increase the number of shares available under the Option Plan by 500,000 shares to 1,500,000 shares. Options may be exercised in whole or in part, but in no event later than ten years from the date of grant with respect to incentive options. Any incentive option granted to an individual who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting of all classes of our stock or the stock of one of our subsidiaries may not be purchased at a price less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant, and no such option may be exercised more than five years from the date of grant. At April 30, 2012, there were 432,500 shares of common stock available for grant under the Option Plan. The Option Plan expires in August 2017.
1997 Stock Option Plan. In July 1997, our board of directors adopted the 1997 Stock Option Plan, referred to in this proxy statement as the 1997 Plan, which was subsequently approved by our stockholders at our 1997 annual meeting of stockholders. The 1997 Plan set aside 1,500,000 shares of our common stock for grants to employees, directors and certain advisors at a price not less than fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The options vest upon issuance. The purchase price of the shares purchased upon exercise must be equal to 100% of the market price on the date of grant; provided, that the purchase price of stock delivered upon the exercise of a qualified incentive stock option granted to a ten percent owner must not be less than 110% of the market price on the date of grant. Options granted pursuant to the 1997 Plan will expire five to ten years from the date of grant. The 1997 Plan expired in July 2007 and at April 30, 2012 there were no shares of common stock available for grant under the 1997 Plan.
Stock Incentive Plan. In August 2005, our board of directors adopted the Incentive Plan, which was subsequently approved by our stockholders at our 2005 annual meeting of stockholders. The Incentive Plan originally set aside 150,000 shares of our common stock for grants to our employees, officers and directors. Our stockholders approved an amendment to the Incentive Plan on October 14, 2009 to increase the number of shares available under the Incentive Plan by 200,000 shares to 350,000 shares. Shares granted under the Incentive Plan have full voting rights prior to the date of vesting, if any; however, holders of any unvested shares must execute an irrevocable proxy granting us the right to vote such shares until the shares vest. At April 30, 2012, there were 187,027 shares of common stock available for grant under the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan will expire pursuant to its terms in August 2015.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards for each named executive officer as of April 30, 2012. The number of options held as of April 30, 2012 includes options granted under the 1997 Stock Option Plan and the 2007 Stock Option Plan.
| |
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable1
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
|
Option Exercise Price ($)
|
Option Expiration Date
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)2
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)3
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
|
William H. Henderson
|
24,000
|
|
|
$23.75
|
12/08/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
$11.90
|
10/16/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
|
|
| |
144,000
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
10,000
|
$459,400
|
|
Jeffrey A.
Williams
|
72,000
|
|
|
$11.90
|
10/16/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
|
|
| |
72,000
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
5,000
|
$229,700
|
|
Eddie L.
Hight
|
18,000
|
|
|
$23.75
|
12/08/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,000
|
|
|
$11.90
|
10/16/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
|
|
| |
72,000
|
|
$24.47
|
11/27/19
|
|
|
5,000
|
$229,700
|
____________________
1 These options vest in equal installments on each of April 30, 2013, April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2015.
2 These restricted shares vest on April 30, 2015 if we attain at least 70% of our cumulative projected fully diluted GAAP earnings per share for the period commencing on May 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 2015.
3 Amounts are calculated by using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested during Fiscal 2012
The following table provides certain information concerning the option exercises and stock awards vested for each named executive officer during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
| |
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)1
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
|
Value Realized on
Vesting
($)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
|
William H. Henderson
|
10,682
|
$246,755
|
-
|
-
|
|
Jeffrey A. Williams
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Eddie L. Hight
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
____________________
1 Amount is calculated by using the closing market price of our common stock on the date of exercise less the exercise price.
Change in Control Agreements
The employment agreements with our named executive officers entered into in August 2007 and amended in November 2009 contain change in control provisions entitling them, upon the occurrence of certain events, to a portion of their base salary and the immediate vesting of stock options and restricted stock. Based on the size of the company, the industry in which it operates and because there are only three executives with employment agreements, the single trigger for change of control payments was established to more closely align the interests of the three executive officers with stockholders should there ever be a proposed change of control event and has been part of the employment agreements since their inception. Under the terms of the employment agreements, a change in control generally means the following:
|
·
|
the acquisition by an individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) of ownership of our stock that, together with stock held by such person, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of our stock;
|
|
·
|
the acquisition by an individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) during the twelve-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person of ownership of our stock possessing 35% or more of the total voting power of our stock;
|
|
·
|
the replacement of a majority of the members of our board of directors during any twelve-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of our board of directors prior to the date of the appointment or election; or
|
|
·
|
the acquisition by an individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) during the twelve-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person of our assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of our assets immediately prior to such acquisition.
|
In the event of a change in control while the named executive officer is still employed under his employment agreement, on the date the change in control becomes effective, we must pay the named executive officer a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.99 times the “base amount” (as defined by Section 280G of the Code) with respect to his compensation and all unvested restricted stock and stock options previously granted vest in full, without regard to the achievement of any applicable performance goals. Such payments are referred to in this proxy statement as change in control payments. If, prior to the change in control, we terminate the named executive officer without cause and the termination is related to the change in control, then, for purposes of his change in control payments, such named executive officer will be treated as being employed on the date the change in control becomes effective. In such case, the named executive officer will receive the change in control payments in addition to any other compensation to which the named executive officer is entitled under his employment agreement as a result of his termination. A termination without cause includes any termination other than for “cause”, which generally consists of a breach, gross negligence or wrongdoing by the named executive officer.
If it is determined that any payment made in connection with a change in control or termination thereafter would be subject to excise taxes, the named executive officer will be entitled to receive a one-time additional payment in an amount reasonably determined by an independent accounting firm to be equal to such excise tax. Payments are payable even if such named executive officer is not eligible for termination benefits under his employment agreement. In the event of any underpayment of such amount, the amount of such underpayment will be promptly paid by us. In the event of any overpayment, the named executive officer will, at our direction and expense, take steps as are reasonably necessary to correct such overpayment; provided, however, that the named executive officer will in no event be obligated to return to us an amount greater than the net after-tax portion of the overpayment and the applicable provisions of the employment agreement will be interpreted in a manner consistent with the intent of making the named executive officer whole, on an after-tax basis.
Assuming that (1) a change in control occurred on April 30, 2012, and (2) the named executive officers were not terminated in connection with the change in control, and using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94, the estimated payment amounts would have been as follows: $7,091,544 for Mr. Henderson; $3,849,969 for Mr. Hight; and $3,358,705 for Mr. Williams. Assuming that (1) a change in control occurred on April 30, 2012, and (2) prior to the change in control the named executive officers were terminated without cause in connection with the change in control, and using the closing market price of our common stock on April 30, 2012 of $45.94, the estimated payment amounts would have been as follows: $8,675,544 for Mr. Henderson; $5,037,969 for Mr. Hight; and $4,546,705 for Mr. Williams.
If a named executive officer is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, any benefits or payments that constitute a “deferral of compensation” under the Section 409A of the Code, become payable as a result of the named executive officer’s termination for reasons other than death, and become due under the employment agreement during the first six months after termination of employment will be delayed and all such delayed payments will be paid to such named executive officers in full in the seventh month after the date of termination and all subsequent payments will be paid in accordance with their original payment schedule.
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, there were no transactions with related persons required to be disclosed in this proxy statement.
In accordance with our audit committee charter, our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, or rejecting, any transactions with “related persons” as defined by SEC rules and any potential conflicts of interest between us and any third party. The audit committee reviews and considers such transactions on a case-by-case basis in light of all facts and circumstances and does not use any prescribed criteria for approving or rejecting any proposed transaction or relationship.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
In accordance with the written charter adopted by our board of directors, a copy of which is available on our website, the audit committee assists the board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, the audit committee met four times and discussed internal control, accounting, auditing and our financial reporting practices with our Chief Financial Officer and our independent auditors and accountants, Grant Thornton LLP. In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, each member of our audit committee has reviewed our audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012 and the audit committee held one meeting with management and Grant Thornton LLP to discuss the audited financial statements prior to filing our annual report on Form 10-K. Our audit committee also met with Grant Thornton LLP to discuss the matters required to be disclosed by statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Professional Standards), prior to filing our annual report on Form 10-K.
In addition, the audit committee has received from Grant Thornton LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Grant Thornton LLP’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its independence in connection with its audit of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. Our audit committee has also considered whether Grant Thornton LLP’s provision of non-audit services to us is compatible with maintaining such firm’s independence with respect to us and has determined that the provision of certain non-audit services is consistent with and compatible with Grant Thornton LLP maintaining its independence. See “Principal Accounting Fees and Services.” Based upon the foregoing reviews and discussions, the audit committee recommended to our board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
Daniel J. Englander, Chairman
John David Simmons
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement with management. Based upon such review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to our board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Robert Cameron Smith, Chairman
William M. Sams
Daniel J. Englander
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, as filed with the SEC, is available to stockholders who make a written request therefore to our Secretary at our offices, 802 Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712. Copies of exhibits filed with that report or referenced therein will be furnished to stockholders of record upon request and payment of our expenses in furnishing such documents. Our annual report on Form 10-K (including exhibits thereto) and this proxy statement are also available by the following link on our website at www.car-mart.com under the “SEC Filings” section, which is under the “Investor Relations” section.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any proposal to be presented at the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders must be received at our principal executive offices no later than May 2, 2013, directed to the attention of the Secretary, for consideration for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. In connection with next year’s annual meeting, if we do not receive notice of a matter or proposal to be considered by July 1, 2013, then the persons appointed by our board of directors to act as the proxies for such annual meeting (named in the form of proxy) will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority with respect to any such matter or proposal at the annual meeting if such matter or proposal is raised at that annual meeting. Any such proposals must comply in all respects with the rules and regulations of the SEC.
OTHER MATTERS
Management does not know of any matter to be brought before the meeting other than those referred to above. If any other matter properly comes before the meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote on each such matter in accordance with their best judgment.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
of
AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC.
The undersigned stockholder(s) of America’s Car-Mart, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby appoints John David Simmons and William H. Henderson, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the annual meeting of the stockholders of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. to be held on September 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the Company’s principal executive office, 802 SE Plaza Avenue, Bentonville, AR 72712, to vote the shares of common stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth below:
(1) To elect six directors for a term of one year and until their successors are elected and qualified:
¨ FOR all nominees listed below (except as indicated to the contrary below)
¨ WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees
| |
Daniel J. Englander |
John David Simmons |
| |
William H. Henderson |
Robert Cameron Smith |
| |
William M. Sams |
Jeffrey A. Williams |
If you wish to withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), write the name(s) on the line below:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
(2)
|
To approve an advisory resolution regarding the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers.
|
| |
¨ |
FOR |
¨ |
AGAINST |
¨ |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
(3)
|
To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013.
|
| |
¨ |
FOR |
¨ |
AGAINST |
¨ |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
(4)
|
In their discretion, upon such other matter or matters which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in accordance with directions given by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, it will be voted FOR the Proposal and as the proxies deem advisable on such other matters as may come before the meeting.
Date: _________________________________
Signature: ______________________________
Signature: ______________________________
(This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as his or her name appears hereon and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, both should sign.)