e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-34084
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0667416 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular Center Building |
|
|
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey |
|
|
San Juan, Puerto Rico
|
|
00918 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value 639,539,900 shares outstanding as of May
5, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to Popular, Incs (the Corporation) financial condition, results of operations, plans,
objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect
to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, market risk and the impact of interest rate
changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal
proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporations financial condition and results of
operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are
forward-looking, and the words anticipate, believe, continues, expect, estimate,
intend, project and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will,
would, should, could, might, can, may, or similar expressions are generally intended to
identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities, including in connection
with our acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Westernbank
Puerto Rico from the FDIC; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate
strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessments; and |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and
certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to
the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the
requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
$ |
677,330 |
|
|
$ |
703,483 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,807 |
|
|
|
175,403 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
304,109 |
|
|
|
293,125 |
|
|
|
319,702 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
700,644 |
|
|
|
549,865 |
|
|
|
930,366 |
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
1,004,753 |
|
|
|
1,002,797 |
|
|
|
1,425,471 |
|
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
346,819 |
|
|
|
415,653 |
|
|
|
533,665 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
33,330 |
|
|
|
46,783 |
|
|
|
162,982 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,193,615 |
|
|
|
2,330,441 |
|
|
|
2,455,629 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
4,342,131 |
|
|
|
4,364,273 |
|
|
|
4,508,609 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost
(fair value at March 31, 2010 $207,850; December
31, 2009 - $213,146; March 31, 2009 $314,580) |
|
|
209,596 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
318,894 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or
realizable value (realizable value at March 31, 2010 -
$158,375; December 31, 2009 - $165,497; March 31, 2009 -
$268,278) |
|
|
156,864 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
222,013 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
308,206 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
23,189,598 |
|
|
|
23,827,263 |
|
|
|
25,355,753 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
111,299 |
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
|
|
117,767 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,277,036 |
|
|
|
1,261,204 |
|
|
|
1,057,125 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
24,180,861 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
579,451 |
|
|
|
584,853 |
|
|
|
624,212 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
134,887 |
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
|
|
95,773 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
131,243 |
|
|
|
126,080 |
|
|
|
142,114 |
|
Servicing assets (at fair value on March 31, 2010 -
$173,359; December 31, 2009 - $169,747;
March 31, 2009 - $177,295) |
|
|
175,776 |
|
|
|
172,505 |
|
|
|
181,095 |
|
Other assets (See Note 9) |
|
|
1,378,011 |
|
|
|
1,322,159 |
|
|
|
1,177,078 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
606,440 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
41,762 |
|
|
|
43,803 |
|
|
|
50,867 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
37,709,428 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
4,476,255 |
|
|
$ |
4,495,301 |
|
|
$ |
4,372,366 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
20,884,057 |
|
|
|
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
22,777,401 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
|
|
25,924,894 |
|
|
|
27,149,767 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,881,997 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
29,453 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
3,399,063 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
941,063 |
|
|
|
983,866 |
|
|
|
1,104,813 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,421 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
31,345,236 |
|
|
|
32,197,508 |
|
|
|
34,577,514 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (March 31, 2009 24,410,000)
(aggregate liquidation preference value at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 - $50,160 (March 31, 2009 -
$1,521,875) |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
1,485,287 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 (March 31, 2009 - $6 par
value); 700,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 (March 31, 2009
470,000,000); 639,544,895 shares issued at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 (March 31, 2009 282,034,819)
and 639,539,900 outstanding at March 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 639,540,105; March 31, 2009
- 282,034,819) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
1,692,209 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
496,455 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(377,807 |
) |
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
|
|
(451,355 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 4,995 shares as of March 31,
2010 (December 31, 2009 4,790 shares) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
of ($29,809) (December 31, 2009
($33,964); March 31, 2009 ($61,563)) |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(90,682 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
3,131,914 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
37,709,428 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
354,649 |
|
|
$ |
401,768 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
64,926 |
|
|
|
73,483 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
427,195 |
|
|
|
489,192 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
92,974 |
|
|
|
148,039 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
|
47,964 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
|
216,706 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
268,917 |
|
|
|
272,486 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
28,717 |
|
|
|
(100,043 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
50,578 |
|
|
|
53,741 |
|
Other service fees (See Note 20) |
|
|
101,320 |
|
|
|
98,533 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
176,146 |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
6,823 |
|
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity
reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(12,222 |
) |
|
|
(13,813 |
) |
Other operating income |
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
186,583 |
|
|
|
234,688 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
95,873 |
|
|
|
105,323 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
|
39,968 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
120,932 |
|
|
|
145,291 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,876 |
|
|
|
26,441 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
23,453 |
|
|
|
26,104 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
12,304 |
|
|
|
13,176 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
Communications |
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
11,827 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
8,295 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
29,496 |
|
|
|
34,234 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
|
304,197 |
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
|
|
(69,509 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
|
(26,933 |
) |
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
|
|
(42,576 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($77,200 |
) |
|
|
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.24 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
Net loss per common share |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.27 |
) |
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
5
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,483,525 |
|
Accretion of Series C preferred stock discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
1,485,287 |
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
1,773,792 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,583 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
1,692,209 |
|
|
Surplus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
621,879 |
|
Stock options expense on unexercised options, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,556 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
496,455 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
|
|
(374,488 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
|
|
(52,522 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942 |
) |
Accretion of Series C preferred stock discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(377,807 |
) |
|
|
(451,355 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(28,829 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
|
(61,853 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
(90,682 |
) |
|
Treasury stock at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(207,515 |
) |
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reissuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,487,201 |
|
|
$ |
3,131,914 |
|
|
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
Preferred stock Series A and B exchanged for common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,468,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock Series C exchanged for trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(935,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
Shares issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred stock and
early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust
preferred securities for common stock) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,510,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
282,034,819 |
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(4,995 |
) |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding |
|
|
639,539,900 |
|
|
|
639,540,105 |
|
|
|
282,034,819 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
61,240 |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
36,111 |
|
|
|
15,313 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net loss |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(176,146 |
) |
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net loss |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
37,595 |
|
|
|
(98,645 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(4,155 |
) |
|
|
36,792 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
|
(61,853 |
) |
|
Comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
($51,615 |
) |
|
|
($114,375 |
) |
|
Tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
($883 |
) |
|
|
($22,783 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(3,748 |
) |
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net loss |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
62,462 |
|
Unrealized net losses on cash flows hedges |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net loss |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
($4,155 |
) |
|
$ |
36,792 |
|
|
Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
($39,722 |
) |
|
|
($40,676 |
) |
|
|
($38,948 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(126,036 |
) |
|
|
(127,786 |
) |
|
|
(198,969 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
47,683 |
|
|
|
48,566 |
|
|
|
76,858 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
(78,353 |
) |
|
|
(79,220 |
) |
|
|
(122,111 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
140,211 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
|
|
89,141 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(17,886 |
) |
|
|
(14,134 |
) |
|
|
(15,913 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
|
122,325 |
|
|
|
89,956 |
|
|
|
73,228 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(3,469 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
618 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
|
($90,682 |
) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
17,049 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustments of servicing assets |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
Amortization of discount on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(176,146 |
) |
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value
pursuant to the fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loan, including adjustments to
indemnity reserves and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments |
|
|
6,099 |
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan origination fees and costs |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(7,716 |
) |
|
|
(3,493 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(20,168 |
) |
|
|
(50,497 |
) |
Net
disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
|
|
(317,338 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
|
|
(113,360 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
21,654 |
|
|
|
26,901 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
221,975 |
|
|
|
212,367 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
|
|
14,039 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
52,769 |
|
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(16,357 |
) |
|
|
(13,936 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(5,983 |
) |
|
|
46,550 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
250,199 |
|
|
|
93,329 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
165,144 |
|
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in money market investments |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
(630,817 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
|
|
(2,939,134 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(31,844 |
) |
|
|
(25,770 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
|
|
(17,701 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
373,676 |
|
|
|
363,863 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
35,229 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,476 |
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,546,944 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
398,734 |
|
|
|
349,877 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
278,481 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
|
|
(4,883 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(15,049 |
) |
|
|
(23,186 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
6,707 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
|
34,915 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
564,265 |
|
|
|
950,093 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(564,592 |
) |
|
|
(396,730 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
|
|
(669,611 |
) |
Net increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
15,937 |
|
|
|
24,519 |
|
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(124,624 |
) |
|
|
(47,938 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,238 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,881 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(814,564 |
) |
|
|
(1,072,404 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(85,155 |
) |
|
|
(81,504 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
$ |
703,483 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Note: The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 includes the
cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued
operations.
8
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation |
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards |
Note 3 Discontinued Operations |
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities |
Note 5 Pledged Assets |
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale |
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity |
Note 8 Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights |
Note 9 Other Assets |
Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Note
11 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
Note 12 Borrowings |
Note 13 Trust Preferred Securities |
Note 14 Stockholders Equity |
Note 15 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Note 16 Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities |
Note 17 Fair Value Measurement |
Note 18 Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Note 19 Net Loss per Common Share |
Note 20 Other Service Fees |
Note 21 Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
Note 22 Stock-Based Compensation |
Note 23 Income Taxes |
Note 24 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
Note 25 Segment Reporting |
Note 26 Subsequent Events |
Note 27 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered
Guaranteed Securities |
9
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin
America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through
its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and
equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance
services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco
Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community
bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA
operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit
accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The Corporation, through its subsidiary EVERTEC,
provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, as well as
internally servicing many of its subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing
businesses. On April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of
Puerto Rico-based Westernbank Puerto Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC) in an assisted transaction (herein, the FDIC-assisted transaction).
Refer to Note 26 to these consolidated financial statements for additional information on this
FDIC-assisted transaction. The financial impact of this acquisition is not recognized in the
Corporations consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The
statement of condition data as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited financial statements.
The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of
the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal
recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Corporations Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010 (the
2009 Annual Report). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.
Note 2 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 860) Accounting for Transfer of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)
ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage
securitizations when a transferor had not surrendered control over the transferred financial
assets, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and includes additional
disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have
continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most
significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of a
financial asset which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated
affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial
assets or third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the meaning of the term
participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in
its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating interests as defined in
ASC Subparagraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods
within that first annual reporting period and for interim and
10
annual reporting periods
thereafter. Earlier application was prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions should
be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date,
existing qualifying special-purpose entities should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting
entities in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance in the Codification. The
Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The
Corporation evaluated transfers of financial assets executed during the quarter ended March 31,
2010 pursuant to the new accounting guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage
securitizations (Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and Federal National Mortgage
Association (FNMA) mortgage-backed securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16
did not have a significant impact on the Corporations results of operations or financial position
for such period.
A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of
financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control
over the assets transferred and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is accounted for as a sale.
Control is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1)
the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the
assets; and (3) the transferor otherwise no longer maintains effective control over the assets.
When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above
criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the
transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial
asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset
that meets the requirements for sale accounting, or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing
obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated
subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing
asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction
that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
Refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial
assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17) and
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain
Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10)
ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIE) and changes how a
reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a)
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that
most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses
of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity. This guidance requires reconsideration of whether an
entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such that the
holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the activities of
the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. It also requires
ongoing assessments of whether a variable interest holder is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all entities that were within
the scope of the original guidance, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that
were previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide
additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant
changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative
accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on variable interest
entities did not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results
of operations upon adoption.
11
The principal variable interest entities evaluated by the Corporation during the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which
management has concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management
believes that the Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer
to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements).
Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the
attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital
companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810),
Amendment for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU
2009-17 for a reporting entitys interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment
company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial
reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral
allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an
investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that
have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the Investment Company Guide). The FASB
also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing
guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure
requirements in ASU 2009-17.
The Corporation was not required to consolidate existing variable interest entities for which it
has a variable interest as of March 31, 2010. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements for required disclosures associated with the guaranteed mortgage securitizations in
which the Corporation holds a variable interest.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that
disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value
measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in
the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements,
which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010.
This guidance
12
impacts disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations
consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about
fair value measurements are presented in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception
Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11)
ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded
derivative bifurcation requirements. The credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption is
related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities
that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such
subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in ASU 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each
entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after March 5, 2010. The Corporation does not expect that
the adoption of this standard will have a significant effect, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18,Receivables (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 310) Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for
as a Single Asset (ASU 2010-18)
The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject
to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that
subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides
guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon
acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are
accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans
from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are
not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to
be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within ASC Subtopic 310-40,
ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 are effective
for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first
interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied
prospectively. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of the guidance in ASU
2010-18, an entity may make a onetime election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under
Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an
entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration.
The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2010-18 may have in its
consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
In 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH) by
selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The loss from discontinued operations
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $9.9 million, net of taxes. This loss was primarily
related to salary and other expenses incurred in providing loan portfolio servicing to affiliated
companies and other costs for full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that were retained for a
transition period.
Note 4 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required
average reserve balances were $753 million as of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $721 million;
March 31, 2009 $694 million). Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term, highly-liquid
securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
13
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Regulatory Act, as of March 31, 2010,
December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009, the Corporation maintained separately for its two
international banking entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally divided for the two
IBEs, which were considered restricted assets.
As part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, as of March 31, 2010, the
Corporation maintained restricted cash of $1 million (December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 $2
million) as collateral for the line of credit. The cash is being held in certificates of deposits
which mature in less than 90 days. The line of credit is used to support letters of credit.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $4 million (December 31, 2009 -
$3 million) to support a letter of credit. The cash is being held in an interest-bearing money
market account.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had restricted cash of $0.8 million (December 31, 2009 $1
million; March 31, 2009 $2 million) to support a letter of credit related to a service settlement
agreement that expires in June 2010.
Note 5 Pledged Assets
Certain securities and loans were pledged principally to secure public and trust deposits, assets
sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative
positions and loan servicing agreements.
The classification and carrying amount of the Corporations pledged assets, in which the secured
parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
1,873,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,338 |
|
|
$ |
1,975,253 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
125,770 |
|
|
|
125,769 |
|
|
|
225,770 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
41,231 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
8,374,460 |
|
|
|
8,993,967 |
|
|
|
7,837,478 |
|
|
Total pledged securities and loans |
|
$ |
10,376,282 |
|
|
$ |
11,045,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,079,732 |
|
|
Pledged securities and loans in which the creditor has the right by custom or contract to
repledge are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
Investment
securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity totaling $1.5 billion as of March
31, 2010 serve as collateral to secure public funds.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB) and from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed). As of March 31,
2010, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the
FHLB aggregating $1.9 billion. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for
borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. As of March 31, 2010, the credit facilities
authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $3.2 billion in
loans held-in-portfolio and investment securities available-for-sale. Also, the
Corporations banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at
the Fed discount window of $3.4
billion, which remained unused as of such date. The amount available under this credit facility is
dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. As of March 31, 2010, the
credit facilities with the Fed were collateralized by $5.2 billion in loans held-in-portfolio.
These pledged assets are included in the above table and were not reclassified and separately
reported in the consolidated statement of condition as of March 31, 2010.
14
Note 6 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield of
investment securities available-for-sale as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
56,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
29,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,542 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
85,960 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
87,228 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
338,331 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,348 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,247,333 |
|
|
|
59,077 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,306,025 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,285 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,886 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,604 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,640,362 |
|
|
|
65,285 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,705,262 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,166 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
22,218 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,909 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
80,920 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
78,748 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
111,222 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
113,002 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,335,392 |
|
|
|
25,982 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
1,359,126 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,451,846 |
|
|
|
28,047 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
1,477,531 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
18,757 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
18,203 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
98,289 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
7,330 |
|
|
|
91,146 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
117,046 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
109,349 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
25,679 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,035 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,885 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23,508 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
194,798 |
|
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
205,612 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,767,080 |
|
|
|
49,182 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
2,813,357 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,010,442 |
|
|
|
60,984 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
3,068,512 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,959 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,395,535 |
|
|
$ |
156,870 |
|
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
|
$ |
6,535,746 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,452 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
349,424 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,915 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,177,318 |
|
|
|
58,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,469 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,492 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,884 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,060 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,581,438 |
|
|
|
66,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647,936 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,311 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
22,303 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,910 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
50,527 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
81,061 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
125,397 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
127,098 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,454,833 |
|
|
|
19,060 |
|
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
|
1,468,056 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,585,146 |
|
|
|
21,285 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
1,600,190 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
20,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
20,232 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
105,669 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
97,326 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
126,554 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
117,558 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
26,878 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,390 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,940 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
205,480 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,261 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,915,689 |
|
|
|
32,102 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
2,937,588 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,178,164 |
|
|
|
42,218 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
3,210,179 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,902 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
7,790 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,590,624 |
|
|
$ |
131,692 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
$ |
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,859 |
|
|
$ |
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,420 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
123,546 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,629 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,400,585 |
|
|
|
74,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474,775 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,811 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,981 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,879 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,477 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,578,821 |
|
|
|
78,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,656,862 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
67,894 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
|
|
63,245 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
29,443 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
29,291 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
104,006 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
99,245 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,881 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4,897 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
159,733 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
160,232 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,454,426 |
|
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
14,326 |
|
|
|
1,458,321 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,619,418 |
|
|
|
19,654 |
|
|
|
15,244 |
|
|
|
1,623,828 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
29,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
27,037 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
143,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,614 |
|
|
|
110,823 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
173,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,013 |
|
|
|
138,192 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
14,087 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
83,775 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
85,410 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
93,042 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
96,608 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,931,499 |
|
|
|
43,825 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
2,974,504 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,122,403 |
|
|
|
49,197 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
3,170,715 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,053 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
191,972 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
192,438 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
42,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
41,223 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
234,332 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
233,661 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,875,097 |
|
|
$ |
150,638 |
|
|
$ |
61,497 |
|
|
$ |
6,964,238 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
17
The following table shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and fair
value of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010, December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
56,767 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities |
|
|
105,107 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
104,722 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
10,231 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10,229 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
181,432 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
179,958 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
634,182 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
631,327 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
991,291 |
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
$ |
986,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
44,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,589 |
|
|
$ |
41,420 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
177,953 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
177,065 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
99,266 |
|
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
|
91,374 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
4,302 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
328,780 |
|
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
|
$ |
316,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
56,767 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities |
|
|
105,107 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
104,722 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
54,240 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
51,649 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
359,385 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
357,023 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
99,481 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
91,578 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
637,432 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
634,518 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
1,320,071 |
|
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,412 |
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
2,395 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
302,584 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
298,917 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,716 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
915,158 |
|
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
|
905,028 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,230,199 |
|
|
$ |
14,804 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
64,129 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
63,429 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
361,788 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
359,214 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
106,991 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
97,904 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
3,566 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
540,809 |
|
|
$ |
12,798 |
|
|
$ |
528,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
66,524 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
65,816 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
664,372 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
658,131 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
113,725 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
104,620 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
918,797 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
908,594 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
1,771,008 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,406 |
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
42,415 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
42,091 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
263,287 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
258,319 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
36,601 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
36,321 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7,907 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
Others |
|
|
53,287 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
51,872 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
412,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,242 |
|
|
$ |
400,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
44,143 |
|
|
$ |
4,844 |
|
|
$ |
39,299 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
467,706 |
|
|
|
10,276 |
|
|
|
457,430 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
163,810 |
|
|
|
33,471 |
|
|
|
130,339 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
82,371 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
81,766 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
759,838 |
|
|
$ |
49,255 |
|
|
$ |
710,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
86,558 |
|
|
$ |
5,168 |
|
|
$ |
81,390 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
730,993 |
|
|
|
15,244 |
|
|
|
715,749 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
172,890 |
|
|
|
35,013 |
|
|
|
137,877 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
118,972 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
118,087 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,715 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
Others |
|
|
53,287 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
51,872 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
1,172,415 |
|
|
$ |
61,497 |
|
|
$ |
1,110,918 |
|
|
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than- temporary, the
value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired, the excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is
accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition
of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt
security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a
rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than
not that the Corporation would be required to sell the security before a forecasted recovery
occurs.
As of March 31, 2010, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual
debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt
20
securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation
will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also,
management evaluated the Corporations portfolio of equity securities as of March 31, 2010. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation did not record any significant
other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities. Management has the intent and ability
to hold the investments in equity securities that are at a loss position as of March 31, 2010 for a
reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of
these investments.
The unrealized losses associated with Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions are primarily associated to approximately $43 million in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Appropriation Bonds (Appropriation Bonds). As of March 31, 2010, those bonds were rated Ba1, one
notch below investment grade by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), while Standard & Poors
(S&P) rates them as investment grade. Subsequently, on April 16, 2010, Moodys rating was changed
to Baa1 (investment grade). Management will continue monitoring those securities as part of its
ongoing OTTI assessments.
The unrealized losses reported for Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies are
principally associated to CMOs that were issued by U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies,
primarily Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(FHLMC), institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support, and Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA), which has the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
These collateralized mortgage obligations are rated AAA by the major rating agencies and are backed
by residential mortgages. The unrealized losses in this portfolio were primarily attributable to
changes in interest rates and levels of market liquidity relative to when the investment securities
were purchased and not due to credit quality of the securities.
The unrealized losses associated with Collateralized mortgage obligations private label
are primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to verifying the
credit ratings for the private-label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan
collateral for these bonds. Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO,
including among others, the weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and
foreclosure rates of the underlying assets in the securities. As of March 31, 2010, there were no
sub-prime or Alt-A securities in the Corporations private-label CMOs portfolios. For
private-label CMOs with unrealized losses as of March 31, 2010, credit impairment was assessed
using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the
security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the
underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities,
considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in
that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and
then projects the expected cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss
severity and prepayment rates. Managements assessment also considered tests using more stressful
parameters. Based on the assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label
CMOs held by the Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2010, thus
management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
All of the Corporations securities classified as mortgage-backed securities were issued by U.S.
Government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily GNMA and FNMA, thus as previously expressed,
have the guarantee or support of the U.S. Government. These mortgage-backed securities are rated
AAA by the major rating agencies and are backed by residential mortgages. Most of the
mortgage-backed securities held as of March 31, 2010 with unrealized losses had been purchased at a
premium during 2009, and although their fair values have declined, they continue to exceed the par
value of the securities. The unrealized losses in this portfolio were generally attributable to
changes in interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to
credit quality of the securities.
21
There were no securities sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized gross realized gains of $182.7 million and proceeds of
$3.5 billion on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale.
The following table states the names of issuers and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of
the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in
which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities of the U.S. Government agencies and corporations. Investments in
obligations issued by a State of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are
payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S.
Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
1,043,826 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,275 |
|
|
$ |
970,744 |
|
|
$ |
991,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,321 |
|
|
$ |
1,239,608 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,379,524 |
|
|
|
1,441,839 |
|
|
|
1,385,535 |
|
|
|
1,449,454 |
|
|
|
1,466,561 |
|
|
|
1,540,697 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
816,939 |
|
|
|
833,476 |
|
|
|
959,316 |
|
|
|
971,556 |
|
|
|
909,344 |
|
|
|
915,635 |
|
22
Note 7 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield
of investment securities held-to-maturity as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31,
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS
OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,820 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,251 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,808 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
17,527 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
46,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
44,144 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
180,788 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
179,059 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
209,596 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
$ |
207,850 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,777 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,781 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
112,566 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,112 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
16,699 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
46,048 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
182,142 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
182,334 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
212,962 |
|
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
213,146 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS
OF MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
25,716 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106,985 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,993 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,245 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
109,188 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
16,819 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
15,948 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
50,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
47,001 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
283,389 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
279,130 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
9,499 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,511 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
318,894 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
4,451 |
|
|
$ |
314,580 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
The following table shows the Corporations amortized cost, gross unrealized losses and fair
value of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31,
2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31,
2010
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
24,715 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
23,186 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,498 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
$ |
48,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
33,795 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
33,066 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,010 |
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
|
$ |
33,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
58,510 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
56,252 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
84,508 |
|
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
$ |
82,233 |
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
2009
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
23,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
38,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
37,718 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
37,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
61,915 |
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
|
$ |
58,905 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
62,135 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
59,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
25,770 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
25,716 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
145,224 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
143,500 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
171,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
169,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
23,645 |
|
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
|
$ |
20,985 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Others |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,131 |
|
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
|
$ |
21,458 |
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
25,770 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
25,716 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
168,869 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
164,485 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Others |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
195,375 |
|
|
$ |
4,451 |
|
|
$ |
190,924 |
|
|
As indicated in Note 6 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
as of March 31, 2010 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto
Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs periodic
credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value as of March 31, 2010 was
attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality; thus no other-than-temporary
decline in value was recorded in these held-to-maturity securities. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely
than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of
their amortized cost basis.
Note 8 Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights
The
Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA
and FNMA securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and
servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the
corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements the Corporation is required to
service the loans in accordance with the agencies servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially
all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have fixed rates and
represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and
warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold loans
with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for a
description of such arrangements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation retained servicing rights on guaranteed
mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales
involving approximately $231
million in principal balance outstanding (March 31, 2009 $335 million). Gains of approximately
$4.5 million were realized on these transactions during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 (March 31, 2009 $585
thousand in losses). All loan sales or securitizations performed
during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were without credit
recourse arrangements.
Mortgage servicing rights
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights
are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Fair value determination is performed on a
subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with the types of assets or markets
served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual
26
servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are
adjusted for the Corporations loan characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The
following table presents the changes in residential MSRs measured using the fair value method
for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fair value
as of January 1 |
|
$ |
169,747 |
|
|
$ |
176,034 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans (1) |
|
|
(3,734 |
) |
|
|
(3,582 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
Fair value
as of March 31 |
|
$ |
173,359 |
|
|
$ |
177,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $17.6 billion as of March 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $17.7 billion; March 31, 2009 $17.6 billion).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 amounted to $10.9 million (March 31, 2009 $11.7
million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding
loan balance. As of March 31, 2010, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.27%
(March 31, 2009 0.27%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not
generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
The discussion that follows includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the
MSRs, originated and purchased.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Prepayment speed
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Weighted average life
|
|
13.5 years
|
|
12.8 years
|
Discount rate (annual rate)
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
102,235 |
|
|
$ |
97,870 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
11.8 years |
|
8.8 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($3,289 |
) |
|
|
($3,182 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($6,500 |
) |
|
|
($7,173 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.90 |
% |
|
|
12.41 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($4,300 |
) |
|
|
($2,715 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($8,362 |
) |
|
|
($6,240 |
) |
|
27
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial
institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the
sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions as of period end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
71,124 |
|
|
$ |
71,877 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
13.5 years |
|
9.9 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,597 |
) |
|
|
($2,697 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($4,562 |
) |
|
|
($5,406 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($3,223 |
) |
|
|
($2,331 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($5,728 |
) |
|
|
($4,681 |
) |
|
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are
hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value
based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses),
which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.3 billion (December 31, 2009 $4.5 billion;
March 31, 2009 $4.8 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the
Corporation.
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation has the right to repurchase, at its option and
without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed
mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual
loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation
is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporation had recorded $138 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this
buy-back option program (December 31, 2009 $124 million; March 31, 2009 $128 million).
Note 9 Other Assets
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of
valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
366,224 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
$ |
364,499 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
234,008 |
|
|
|
232,387 |
|
|
|
226,695 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
193,166 |
|
|
|
206,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
125,387 |
|
|
|
130,762 |
|
|
|
121,293 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
106,147 |
|
|
|
99,772 |
|
|
|
94,691 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
72,356 |
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
57,536 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
46,533 |
|
Others |
|
|
223,187 |
|
|
|
216,037 |
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,378,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,159 |
|
|
$ |
1,177,078 |
|
|
28
Note 10 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 25 for the definition of the
Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
acquired |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,001 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,227 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
606,440 |
|
|
The gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses at the beginning and the end of
the quarter by reportable segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Accumulated |
|
Balance at |
|
Balance at |
|
Accumulated |
|
Balance at |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Impairment |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Impairment |
|
March 31, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
Consumer and Retail
Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North
America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Accumulated |
|
Balance at |
|
Balance at |
|
Accumulated |
|
Balance at |
|
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
Impairment |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Impairment |
|
March 31, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
Consumer and Retail
Banking |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
117,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,001 |
|
Other Financial Services |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
8,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,227 |
|
Banco Popular North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North
America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
44,679 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
770,386 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
$ |
771,034 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
606,440 |
|
|
The purchase accounting adjustments in the EVERTEC reportable
segment for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 are related to
contingency payments on acquisitions made prior to January 1,
2009.
As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 the Corporation had $6 million of
identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, with indefinite useful lives.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
32,706 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
30,991 |
|
|
$ |
65,380 |
|
|
$ |
25,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other customer
relationships |
|
|
8,743 |
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74,247 |
|
|
$ |
38,834 |
|
|
$ |
74,320 |
|
|
$ |
36,866 |
|
|
$ |
77,176 |
|
|
$ |
32,658 |
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $2.0 million in
amortization related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (March 31, 2009 $2.4
million).
The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets
with definite useful lives for each of the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2010 |
|
$ |
5,629 |
|
Year 2011 |
|
|
6,982 |
|
Year 2012 |
|
|
5,967 |
|
Year 2013 |
|
|
5,784 |
|
Year 2014 |
|
|
5,146 |
|
Year 2015 |
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
30
Note
11 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Refer to Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2009 Annual Report for a
complete description of the Corporations derivative activities.
The following discussion and tables provide a description of the derivative instruments used as
part of the Corporations interest rate risk management strategies. The use of derivatives is
incorporated as part of the Corporations overall interest rate risk management strategy to
minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that are caused by interest
rate volatility. The Corporations goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying the
repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that the
net interest income is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in interest rates.
The Corporation uses derivatives in its trading activities to facilitate customer transactions, to
take proprietary positions and as a means of risk management. As a result of interest rate
fluctuations, hedged fixed and variable interest rate assets and liabilities will appreciate or
depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation is expected to
be substantially offset by the Corporations gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are
linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. As a matter of policy, the Corporation does not use
highly leveraged derivative instruments for interest rate risk management.
By using derivative instruments, the Corporation exposes itself to credit and market risk. If a
counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, the
Corporations credit risk will equal the fair value of the derivative asset. Generally, when the
fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes the
Corporation, thus creating a repayment risk for the Corporation. To manage the level of credit
risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting
agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. The derivative assets
include a $6.9 million negative adjustment as a result of the credit risk of the counterparties as
of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $5.1 million negative adjustment; March 31, 2009 $5.6
million negative adjustment). On the other hand, when the fair value of a derivative contract is
negative, the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, the fair value of derivative
liabilities incorporates nonperformance risk or the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled.
The derivative liabilities include a $2.6 million positive adjustment related to the incorporation
of the Corporations own credit risk as of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $2.1 million
positive adjustment; March 31, 2009 $3.7 million positive adjustment).
Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or
implied volatility rates might have on the value of a financial instrument. The Corporation manages
the market risk associated with interest rates and, to a limited extent, with fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates by establishing and monitoring limits for the types and degree of
risk that may be undertaken. The Corporation regularly measures this risk by using static gap
analysis, simulations and duration analysis.
Pursuant
to the Corporations accounting policy, the fair value of
derivatives is not offset with the amounts for the right to reclaim cash
collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral. As of March 31, 2010, the amount recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral
under master netting arrangements was $82 million and the amount recognized for the obligation to
return cash collateral was $5 million (December 31, 2009 $88 million and $4 million,
respectively).
Certain of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the
corresponding banking subsidiary well-capitalized status and credit rating. These agreements could
require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The aggregate fair value of all
derivative instruments with contingent features that were in a liability position as of March 31,
2010 was $70 million (December 31, 2009 $66 million). Based on the contractual obligations
established on these derivative instruments, the Corporation has fully collateralized these
positions by pledging collateral of $82 million as of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $88
million).
31
Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges or non-hedging derivatives outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Condition |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
111,300 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
111,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
144,400 |
|
|
Trading account securities |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
161 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
995,976 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
65,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
995,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
71,518 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with clients |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4 |
|
Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparty |
|
|
637 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1 |
|
Interest rate caps and floors |
|
|
139,804 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps and floors for the benefit of corporate clients |
|
|
139,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
186 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
99,750 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
76,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
2,593,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,625 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
2,704,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Condition |
|
Fair |
|
Condition |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commitments |
|
$ |
120,800 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
120,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
165,300 |
|
|
Trading account securities |
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
79 |
|
Interest rate swaps associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- swaps with corporate clients |
|
|
1,006,154 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
63,120 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
131 |
|
- swaps offsetting position of corporate clients swaps |
|
|
1,006,154 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
131 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
67,358 |
|
Interest rate caps and floors |
|
|
139,859 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps and floors for the benefit of corporate
clients |
|
|
139,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
249 |
|
Indexed options on deposits |
|
|
110,900 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
|
84,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
2,652,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,219 |
|
|
Total derivative assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
2,773,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,241 |
|
|
32
Cash Flow Hedges
The Corporation utilizes forward contracts to hedge the sale of mortgage-backed securities with
duration terms over one month. Interest rate forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery of
securities, which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date at a specified price or
yield. These forward contracts are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow
hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) corresponding
to these forward contracts is expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months.
These contracts have a maximum remaining maturity of 82 days as of March 31, 2010.
For cash flow hedges, gains and losses on derivative contracts that are reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to current period earnings are included in the line
in which the hedged item is recorded and during the period in which the forecasted transaction
impacts earnings, as presented in the tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
and Amount |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
Excluded from |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
Forward commitments |
|
|
($31 |
) |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges |
|
|
($31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Classification in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Derivatives |
|
in Income on |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Operations of the |
|
(Loss) |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
OCI on |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
and Amount |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Reclassified from |
|
AOCI into |
|
Excluded from |
|
and Amount |
|
|
(Effective |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
Income (Effective |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Excluded from |
(In thousands) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Forward
commitments |
|
|
($1,586 |
) |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
($1,917 |
) |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges |
|
|
($1,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($2,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI Other Comprehensive Income
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
33
Non-Hedging Activities
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation recognized a loss of $4.3 million
and $12.4 million, respectively, related to its non-hedging derivatives, as detailed in the tables
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Classification of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
Recognized in Income on |
(In thousands) |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Forward contracts |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
($3,071 |
) |
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2 |
|
Indexed options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
263 |
|
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
286 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($4,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Classification of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
Recognized in Income on |
(In thousands) |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Forward contracts |
|
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
($8,052 |
) |
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1 |
|
Foreign currency and
exchange rate commitments |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
9 |
|
Indexed options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,216 |
) |
Bifurcated embedded options |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
877 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($12,351 |
) |
|
Forward Contracts
The Corporation has forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities with terms lasting less
than a month, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. Changes in their fair value are
recognized in trading account profit (loss).
Interest Rates Swaps and Foreign Currency and Exchange Rate Commitments
In addition to using derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy,
the Corporation also utilizes derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange
contracts, in its capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers. The Corporation minimizes
its market risk and credit risk by taking offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions
with credit limit approvals and monitoring procedures. Market value changes on these swaps and
other derivatives are recognized in earnings in the period of change.
Interest Rate Caps and Floors
The Corporation enters into interest rate caps and floors as an intermediary on behalf of its
customers and simultaneously takes offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions, thus
minimizing its market and credit risks.
34
Note 12 Borrowings
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
2,491,506 |
|
|
$ |
2,632,790 |
|
|
$ |
2,881,997 |
|
|
The repurchase agreements outstanding as of March 31,
2010 were collateralized by $2.2 billion in investment securities
available-for-sale and $347 million in
trading securities. It is the Corporations policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under
agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements
of condition.
In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $181 million in securities
purchased underlying agreements to resell which the Corporation has the right to repledge.
It is the Corporations policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell.
However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control
over such securities, and accordingly are not reflected in the Corporations consolidated statements of condition.
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Secured borrowing with clearing broker with an interest rate of 1.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured borrowings with private investors paying interest at fixed rates
ranging from 0.35% to 3.125% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,128 |
|
Term funds purchased paying interest at maturity at fixed rates
ranging from 0.90% to 0.95% |
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
Total other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
$ |
7,326 |
|
|
$ |
29,453 |
|
|
35
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-with maturities ranging from 2010 through 2015 paying interest at monthly
fixed
rates ranging from 1.48% to 5.10% (March 31, 2009 1.48% to 5.06%) |
|
$ |
1,056,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,627 |
|
|
$ |
1,108,986 |
|
-maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from 3.00% to 6.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2010 to 2013 paying interest
semiannually
at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 13.00% (March 31, 2009 4.70% to
7.50%) |
|
|
381,926 |
|
|
|
382,858 |
|
|
|
961,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2010 to 2013 paying interest
monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes maturing in 2011 paying interest quarterly at a floating rate
of 9.75% (March 31, 2009 0.40% to 3.75%) over the 3-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
425,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest
rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 13) |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
849,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) ($936,000 less discount of $507,335 as of March 31, 2010) with no
stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding
December 5,
2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 13) |
|
|
428,665 |
|
|
|
423,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
25,654 |
|
|
|
27,169 |
|
|
|
27,413 |
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
2,529,092 |
|
|
$ |
2,648,632 |
|
|
$ |
3,399,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for rates and maturity information
corresponding to the borrowings outstanding as of such date. Key index rates as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively,
were as follows: 3-month LIBOR rate = 0.29% and 1.19%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 3.83% and 2.67%. |
Included in the table above are $175 million in term notes with interest that adjusts in the
event of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes have an interest rate of
9.75% over the 3-month LIBOR and mature in September 2011. A future reduction in the Corporations
senior debt rating could increment the cost of these term notes by an additional 75 basis points
per notch.
The maturities of borrowings as of March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,329,316 |
|
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
$ |
338,837 |
|
|
$ |
1,691,416 |
|
2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,260 |
|
|
|
572,260 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,917 |
|
|
|
706,917 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,780 |
|
|
|
178,780 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
360,824 |
|
Later years |
|
|
638,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,809 |
|
|
|
1,104,999 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
3,036,427 |
|
|
|
5,551,196 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(507,335 |
) |
|
|
(507,335 |
) |
|
Total borrowings |
|
$ |
2,491,506 |
|
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
$ |
2,529,092 |
|
|
$ |
5,043,861 |
|
|
36
Note 13 Trust Preferred Securities
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had established four trusts (BanPonce Trust I,
Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) for
the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (also referred to as capital securities) to the
public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of
common securities of the trusts (the common securities), were used by the trusts to purchase
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the junior subordinated debentures) issued by
the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular Capital Trust III for the
purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury at the time
for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In connection with this exchange, the trust
used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of issuance and sale of common
securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation.
The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the
Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the
Corporation.
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
37
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
BanPonce |
|
Popular Capital |
|
America Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
935,000 |
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
5.000% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.000% thereafter |
|
Common securities |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
$ |
936,000 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
December 2034 |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
Reference notes |
|
(a),(c),(f),(g) |
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
(a),(c),(f) |
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
(b),(d),(h),(i) |
|
|
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of March 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
BanPonce |
|
Popular Capital |
|
America Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Common securities |
|
$ |
4,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,279 |
|
|
$ |
7,732 |
|
|
$ |
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
debentures aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
148,640 |
|
|
$ |
309,279 |
|
|
$ |
257,732 |
|
|
$ |
134,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
December 2034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference notes |
|
(a),(c),(e),(f),(g) |
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
(a),(c),(f) |
|
|
(b),(d),(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and
indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(b) |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
(c) |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the
capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(d) |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by
the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
(e) |
|
The original issuance was for $150 million. The Corporation had reacquired $6 million of
the 8.327% capital securities. |
|
(f) |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal
Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below,
the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior
subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated
maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements,
in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment
company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
(g) |
|
Same as (f) above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early
redemption. |
|
(h) |
|
The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the
consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. |
|
(i) |
|
Carrying value of junior subordinates debentures of $429 million as of March 31, 2010
($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $507 million discount) and $424 million as
of December 31, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $512 million
discount). |
38
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities
represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 Capital, subject to quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital
elements that may be included in the Tier 1 Capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25%
of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust
preferred securities). At March 31, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements
exceeded the 25% limitation and, as such, $40 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities
were disallowed as Tier 1 capital (December 31, 2009 $7 million). Amounts of restricted core
capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to
further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the quantitative limit which would limit
restricted core capital elements included in the Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of
the sum of core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less
any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit would be effective on March 31, 2011.
Note 14 Stockholders Equity
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $402 million as of March
31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $402 million; March 31, 2009 $392 million). There were no transfers
between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Note 15 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit amounted to $18 million and $124
million, respectively, as of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $13 million and $134 million;
March 31, 2009 $18 million and $189 million). There were also other commitments outstanding and
contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.7 million (December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009 $0.7 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations
undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. The Corporation
recognizes at fair value the obligation at inception of the standby letters of credit. The fair
value approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are
deferred and recognized over the commitment period. This liability is included as part of other
liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The contract amounts in standby letters of
credit outstanding represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the Corporation could
be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the customers. These
standby letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire
without being drawn upon. In
the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Corporation has rights to the underlying
collateral provided, if any, which normally includes cash and marketable securities, real estate,
receivables, among others. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these
instruments.
The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may have sold, in bulk
sale transactions, residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse or to certain
representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and
warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral,
prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans
under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.3 billion (December 31, 2009 $4.5 billion;
March 31, 2009 $4.8 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions,
principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac programs. In the event of any customer
default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation may be required to repurchase
the loan or reimburse for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount
of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the
39
recourse arrangements
in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of
the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the
Corporation repurchased approximately $18 million in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse
provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the
underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these
loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage
loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest
advanced and the costs of holding and disposing of the related property. Historically, the losses
associated to these credit recourse arrangements, which pertained to residential mortgage loans in
Puerto Rico, have not been significant. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations liability
established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with
credit recourse amounted to $29 million (December 31, 2009 $16 million; March 31, 2009 $15
million).
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which
are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private
investors, or may sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the
extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the
Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review
procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met.
The Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial
statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representation and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA,
and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors,
including FHLMC, require the Corporation to
advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such
payments have not been received from the borrowers. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced
$17.6 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit recourse (December 31,
2009 $17.7 billion; March 31, 2009 $17.6 billion). The Corporation generally recovers funds
advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds from
mortgage loans foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA
insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of
the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear
the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a
defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure
proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that
loan. As of March 31, 2010, the amount of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage
loan servicing agreements was approximately $21 million (December 31, 2009 $14 million; March 31,
2009 $8 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporations servicing
portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate
additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur
additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representation and
warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN. Loans had been sold to investors on
a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. The loans had been sold prior to 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation and
warranty arrangements amounted to $32 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in
the consolidated statement of condition (December 31, 2009 $33 million; March 31, 2009 $10
million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans, since the subsidiary ceased these
activities during 2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected
losses associated to E-LOANs customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis
incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole
events. The analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loans
funding date and the loan repurchase date as observed in the historical loan data. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, E-LOAN charged-
40
off approximately $3 million against this
representation and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases and indemnification or
make-whole events (quarter ended March 31, 2009 $1 million). Make-whole events are typically defaulted
cases in which the investor attempts to recover by collateral or guarantees, and the seller is
obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered portion of the loan.
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or
warranties in
connection with various sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. These sales were on
a non-credit recourse basis. The agreements primarily include indemnification for breaches of
certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time period;
others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do not
expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability defined
as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding as of March 31,
2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations
reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $10 million (December 31, 2009 $9
million; March 31, 2009 $15 million). During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation
recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFHs representation and warranty arrangements amounting
to approximately $0.5 million (quarter ended March 31, 2009 $0.6 million). The reserve balance as
of March 31, 2010 contemplates historical indemnity payments. Certain indemnification provisions,
which included, for example, reimbursement of premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase
obligations for defaulted loans within a short-term timeframe, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc.
Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with
respect to the indemnification obligations.
During 2009, the Corporation sold a lease portfolio of approximately $0.3 billion. As of March 31,
2010, the reserve established to provide for any losses on the breach of certain representations
and warranties included in the associated sale agreements amounted to $4 million (December 31, 2009
- $6 million; March 31, 2009 - $12 million). This reserve is included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement
of condition.
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.6 billion
as of March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $0.6 billion; March 31, 2009 $1.7 billion). In
addition, as of March 31, 2010, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis
$1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) (December 31, 2009 $1.4 billion;
March 31, 2009 $824 million) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set
forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial
statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the
final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early
stages and management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and May 10, 2010, five putative class actions and two derivative claims were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Court
of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers,
among others. The five class actions have now been consolidated into two separate actions: a
securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action entitled
In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v. Popular, Inc.
et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
includes as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The
consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities between January
24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by
issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the
41
Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action complaint.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated
complaint purports to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k)
Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan from
January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409 and
502(a)(2) of the ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleges that the
defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to
eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint seeks to recover
alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive
trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a
scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to
the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the
alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) have been brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment
that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the
Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class
action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García
complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On
November 20, 2009, and pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the
García amended complaint. The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San
Juan, has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13,
2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On
October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Díaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand
proceedings. At a scheduling conference held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in
both the Hoff and García matters pending resolution of their respective motions to dismiss.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that the plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under
Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, the plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of
operations.
42
Note 16 Non-Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
As indicated in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation transfers
residential mortgage loans in guaranteed loan securitizations or whole loan sales. The
Corporations continuing involvement in these transfers includes owning certain beneficial
interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable
interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed
securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the Corporations
consolidated statement of condition as available-for-sale and trading securities. Refer to Note 17
to the consolidated financial statements for securities held as of March 31, 2010, the designated
fair value hierarchy level and valuation techniques associated to such securities. For information
on servicing assets refer to Notes 8 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, Note 8
provides the principal balance of loans sold and the associated gain recognized during the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 related to the residential mortgage loans sold or securitized.
The Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage
securitization transactions. These special purpose entities are deemed to be variable interest
entities (VIEs) since they lack equity investments at risk. As part of the adoption of ASU
2009-17, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation evaluated these guaranteed mortgage
securitization structures in which it participates, including GNMA and FNMA, and concluded that the
Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, are not required to be
consolidated in the Corporations financial statements. The Corporation qualitatively assessed
whether it held a controlling financial interest in these VIEs, which included analyzing if it had
both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the VIE. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA)
control the design of the VIE, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the
underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at
will, and remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA. Moreover,
through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the obligation to absorb losses
that could be potentially significant to the VIE.
The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those
securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the
Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities,
collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in
which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding as of March 31,
2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading
securities in the Corporations consolidated statement of condition. In addition, the Corporation
may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose
entities (SPEs) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored
SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the
servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable
interests in the VIEs because the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest
that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities investors and to the guaranty fees
that need to be paid to the federal agencies.
43
The
following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and
liabilities related to the
Corporations variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs
and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporations involvement as
servicer with non-consolidated VIEs as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
108,184 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Total servicing assets |
|
$ |
108,184 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing advances |
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
111,183 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
Maximum exposure to loss |
|
$ |
111,183 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the
form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to
$9.3 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be
incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all
loans serviced are delinquent and that
the value of the Corporations interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without
any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss
includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum
exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.
Note 17 Fair Value Measurement
ASC Subtopic 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in
order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The
hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3- Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
44
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used
in calculating the fair value could significantly affect the results.
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
3,069 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,496 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
6,536 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
7,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($77 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($77 |
) |
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,658 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,695 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,962 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6,923 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
6,964 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to fair value
option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7,437 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Refer to Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($111 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($111 |
) |
|
47
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities still |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
held as of |
|
|
January |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
paydowns |
|
of March |
|
March 31, |
(In millions) |
|
1, 2010 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
(net) |
|
31, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage backed
securities- agencies |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
(a) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($21 |
) |
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) |
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
included in |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities still |
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
other |
|
in accrued |
|
and |
|
Balance as |
|
held as of |
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
comprehensive |
|
interest |
|
paydowns |
|
of March |
|
March 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
receivable |
|
(net) |
|
31, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage- backed securities-
Federal agencies |
|
|
292 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
(a) |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
($5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
|
($1 |
)(c) |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to fair
value option |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
|
($2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($14 |
) |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
b) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
|
c) |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair
value on a recurring basis during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Also, there were no
transfers in and / or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
If transfers were to be recognized, the Corporations policy is to recognize them as of the end of
the reporting period.
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in
the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
($5 |
) |
|
|
($1 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
($2 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
49
Additionally, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may
be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent
to their initial recognition. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific
reserves under ASC Subsection 310-10-35 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, or
write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and non-financial assets
that were subject to a fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, and which were still included in the consolidated statement of condition
as of such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate fair value measurements of those
assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of March 31, 2010 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
Loans
heldforsale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other real
estate owned (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured
based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC Subsection 310-10-35. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans
heldforsale. These adjustments were principally
determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans.
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were
measured at fair value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of March 31, 2009 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Other real estate owned (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Other foreclosed assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other real estate owned (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured
based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC Subsection 310-10-35. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were
measured at fair value. |
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value of the financial
instruments disclosed do not represent managements estimate of the underlying value of the
Corporation.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active
exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency
securities are classified as Level 2. |
50
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality
and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS
are classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced
using an internally-developed pricing matrix with quoted prices from local broker dealers.
These particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These investment
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities and mutual funds (included as other in the trading account
securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker
dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly
liquid markets, the corporate securities and mutual funds are classified as Level 2. The
important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares
are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based
on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as
forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified
as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider
the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the
risk, and uses available public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that
denote their probability of default.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges,
other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the unobservable
nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Subsection 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Subsection 310-10-35. Currently, the
associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
51
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounted cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal
adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Note 18 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value. For
disclosures about the fair value of derivative instruments refer to Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In different interest rate
environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate
financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value
of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is,
they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and
assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 are described in the paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated
statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, bankers acceptances and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term
maturities are valued using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for
agreements with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statement of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes. These instruments are detailed in the consolidated
statements of condition and in Notes 6 and 7.
52
The
estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale was based on secondary
market prices, bids received from potential buyers and discounted
cash flow models. The fair
values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar
characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential
mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further
segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage.
Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting scheduled cash
flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and
expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment,
default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations.
Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing
portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and money market accounts was, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount
payable on demand as of the respective dates. The fair value of
certificates of deposit was based on
the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates
with similar maturities. The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in
part dependent of the buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes
occurs. Therefore, the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary
significantly from the presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collateralization levels as part of its evaluation of non-performance risk. Also,
for certificates of deposit, the non-performance risk was determine using internally-developed
models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term,
and the credit premium of the institution.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
53
Carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
1,596,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,596,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
380,149 |
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
209,596 |
|
|
|
207,850 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
213,146 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
156,864 |
|
|
|
158,375 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
165,497 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
110,253 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
91,542 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
|
19,798,779 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
20,021,224 |
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
25,360,312 |
|
|
$ |
25,491,135 |
|
|
$ |
25,924,894 |
|
|
$ |
26,076,515 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
2,618,208 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,759,438 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
|
|
2,386,871 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
2,453,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
6,744,092 |
|
|
$ |
3,805 |
|
|
$ |
7,013,148 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
142,772 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
147,647 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
Note
19 Net Loss per Common Share
The
computation of net loss per common share (EPS) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($42,576 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,916 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($77,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
639,003,599 |
|
|
|
281,834,434 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
639,003,599 |
|
|
|
281,834,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.24 |
) |
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.27 |
) |
|
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of
stock options and under restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method
assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition
to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common
stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the
shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to
compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options and restricted stock awards that
result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method
are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would
have an antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.
54
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there were 2,552,663 weighted average antidilutive stock
options outstanding (March 31, 2009 2,938,506). Additionally, the Corporation has outstanding
a warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of common stock, which has an antidilutive effect as of
March 31, 2010.
Note 20 Other Service Fees
The caption of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the
following major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
26,593 |
|
|
$ |
26,373 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,297 |
|
|
|
24,005 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
13,408 |
|
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value
adjustments |
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
10,990 |
|
|
|
12,004 |
|
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
8,534 |
|
|
Total other service fees |
|
$ |
101,320 |
|
|
$ |
98,533 |
|
|
Note 21 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Corporation has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and supplementary benefit pension
plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. Effective May 1, 2009, the accrual of
the benefits under the BPPR retirement plan was frozen to all participants. Pursuant to the
amendment, the retirement plan participants will not receive any additional credit for compensation
earned and service performed after April 30, 2009 for purposes of calculating benefits under the
retirement plans.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Benefit Restoration Plans |
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
7,953 |
|
|
|
8,547 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7,776 |
) |
|
|
(6,877 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
8,340 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
Curtailment loss (gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
There were no contributions made to the pension and benefit restoration plans during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2010 for
the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to approximately $3.2 million.
55
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic cost |
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan
amounted to approximately $1.1 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year
2010 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $5.2 million.
Note 22 Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. Nevertheless, all outstanding award grants under the Stock Option
Plan continue to remain in effect as of March 31, 2010 under the original terms of the Stock Option
Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Remaining Life of |
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price of |
Range per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
In Years |
|
(fully vested) |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
$14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
1,245,277 |
|
|
$ |
15.85 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
1,245,277 |
|
|
$ |
15.85 |
|
$19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
1,307,386 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
1,307,386 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
$14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
|
There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding as of March 31, 2010 (March 31, 2009 -
$0.2 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable as of March 31, 2010 and 2009.
56
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding
as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,965,843 |
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(59,631 |
) |
|
|
26.42 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(353,549 |
) |
|
|
19.25 |
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
|
The stock options exercisable at March 31, 2010 totaled 2,552,663 (March 31, 2009
2,842,628). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarters ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2009 and 2010.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there was no stock option expense recognized (March 31, 2009
- $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $56 thousand).
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and / or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be made available from common stock purchased by
the Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.
The Corporations policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such
shares in the open market to cover each grant.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
57
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members
of management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested
as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
248,339 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(104,791 |
) |
|
|
21.93 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,036 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
138,512 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
962,373 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(136,241 |
) |
|
|
8.37 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
964,438 |
|
|
$ |
4.22 |
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, 962,373 shares of restricted stock under the Incentive Plan were awarded to
management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final
Rule. The awards were determined upon consideration of managements execution of critical 2009
initiatives to manage the Corporations liquidity and capitalization, strategically reposition its
United States operations, and improve management effectiveness and cost control. The shares will vest on the secondary anniversary of
the grant date, and they may become payable in 25% increments as the Corporation repays each 25%
portion of the aggregate financial assistance received under the
United States Treasury Departments Capital Purchase Program
under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. In addition, the grants are
also subject to further performance criteria as the Corporation must achieve profitability for at
least one fiscal year for awards to be payable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, no shares
of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share
awards consist of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.s common stock provided that the Corporation
achieves certain performance goals during a three-year performance cycle. The compensation cost
associated with the performance shares is recorded ratably over a three-year performance
period. The performance shares are granted at the end of the
three-year period and vest at grant date, except when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation
without cause. In such case, the participant would receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as
if the Corporation would have met the performance goal for the performance period. As of March 31,
2010, 12,426 shares have been granted under this plan (March 31, 2009 23,299).
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.3 million of restricted
stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million (March 31,
2009 $0.2 million, with a tax benefit of $68 thousand). The fair market value of the restricted
stock vested was $1.3 million at grant date and $0.3 million at vesting date. This triggers a
shortfall, net of windfalls, of $1.0 million that was recorded as an additional income tax expense
at the applicable income tax rate, net of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized
$0.1 million of performance shares expense, with a
tax benefit of $60 thousand (March 31, 2009 credit of $0.1 million, with a tax expense of $78
thousand). The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards
and performance shares to members of management as of March 31, 2010 was $1.4 million and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
58
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for
members of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested
as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
270,515 |
|
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(270,515 |
) |
|
|
2.62 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(35,133 |
) |
|
|
2.12 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation granted 35,133 shares of restricted
stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became vested at grant
date (March 31, 2009 22,311). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of
restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $47
thousand (March 31, 2009 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $47 thousand). The fair value at
vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 for directors
was $74 thousand.
Note 23 Income Taxes
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.5 |
|
Additions for tax positions January through March |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Reduction as a result of settlements January through
March |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the related accrued interest approximated $6.5 million (March 31, 2009 -
$5.4 million). Management determined that as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 there was no need to accrue
for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $33.0 million as of March 31,
2010 (March 31, 2009 $44.7 million).
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of
March 31, 2010, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction:
2008 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2005 and thereafter. The U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) completed an examination of the Corporations U.S. operations tax return
for 2007. As a result of the audit, the IRS has not proposed any
material adjustments; accordingly,
the Corporation recognized a tax benefit of $14.3 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
The Corporation does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits within the next 12 months.
59
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward |
|
$ |
11,398 |
|
|
$ |
11,026 |
|
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available |
|
|
887,958 |
|
|
|
843,968 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
104,679 |
|
|
|
103,979 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
547,785 |
|
|
|
536,277 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
13,787 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
6,861 |
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
21,165 |
|
|
|
39,096 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,604,034 |
|
|
|
1,565,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between assigned values and the tax basis of the
assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations |
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
25,896 |
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
9,158 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities |
|
|
36,677 |
|
|
|
30,323 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
79,471 |
|
|
|
71,850 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets less liabilities |
|
|
1,524,563 |
|
|
|
1,493,849 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
(1,158,316 |
) |
|
|
(1,129,882 |
) |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
366,247 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all
available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or
all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available
evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets,
including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of
sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The
analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset,
including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income
exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback
years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended March 31, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets
in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant negative
evidence and has caused management to conclude that the Corporation will not be able to realize the
associated deferred tax assets in the future. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded a
valuation allowance of $1.2 billion on the deferred tax assets of its U.S. operations. As of March
31, 2010, the Corporations deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to
$385 million. The Corporation assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of the net
deferred tax assets and based on the weighting of all available evidence has concluded that it is
more likely than not that such net deferred tax assets will be realized.
60
Note 24 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Additional disclosures on non-cash activities for the three-month period are listed in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
32,032 |
|
|
$ |
30,631 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
9,733 |
|
|
|
9,897 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
41,765 |
|
|
|
40,528 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
20,248 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
16,174 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities (a) |
|
|
205,056 |
|
|
|
311,104 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on
securitizations or asset
transfers |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes loans securitized into investment securities and
subsequently sold before quarter end. |
Note 25 Segment Reporting
The Corporations corporate structure consists of three reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico, Banco Popular North America and EVERTEC.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets as of March 31, 2010, additional disclosures are provided
for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR, which
are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the
lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR
allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market
rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well
as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on
retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the
lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and
lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan
originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the
investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the
investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the
brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency
and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk
Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries
generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this
subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment
and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.
61
EVERTEC:
This reportable segment includes the financial transaction processing and technology functions of
the Corporation, including EVERTEC, with offices in Puerto Rico, Florida, the Dominican Republic
and Venezuela; and ATH Costa Rica, S.A., EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA and T.I.I. Smart
Solutions Inc. located in Costa Rica. In addition, this reportable segment includes the equity
investments in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Servicios Financieros, S.A.
de C.V. (Serfinsa), which operate in the Dominican Republic and El Salvador, respectively. This
segment provides processing and technology services to other units of the Corporation as well as to
third parties, principally other financial institutions in Puerto Rico, the Caribbean and Central
America.
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank, excluding the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa,
which due to the nature of their operations are included as part of the EVERTEC segment. The
Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as
critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
The results of operations included in the tables below for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 exclude
the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH. Segment assets as of March 31, 2009
also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations.
2010
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
219,363 |
|
|
$ |
78,854 |
|
|
|
($227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
108,372 |
|
|
|
131,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
110,717 |
|
|
|
16,559 |
|
|
|
62,197 |
|
|
|
($37,450 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
183,121 |
|
|
|
63,628 |
|
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
(37,455 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
27,026 |
|
|
|
($104,170 |
) |
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
23,165,773 |
|
|
$ |
10,399,867 |
|
|
$ |
230,901 |
|
|
|
($93,768 |
) |
|
62
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
297,990 |
|
|
|
($29,235 |
) |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
152,023 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
157,866 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
250,612 |
|
|
|
14,089 |
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
263,473 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
8,916 |
|
|
|
(18,406 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($66,962 |
) |
|
|
($18,563 |
) |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
33,702,773 |
|
|
$ |
5,338,760 |
|
|
|
($5,209,096 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
2009
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
EVERTEC |
|
Eliminations |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
216,162 |
|
|
$ |
76,520 |
|
|
|
($245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
151,334 |
|
|
|
221,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
310,821 |
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
61,528 |
|
|
|
($36,269 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,155 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
187,483 |
|
|
|
77,847 |
|
|
|
42,600 |
|
|
|
(36,169 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
179,811 |
|
|
|
($213,476 |
) |
|
$ |
9,881 |
|
|
|
($50 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
24,720,327 |
|
|
$ |
12,214,139 |
|
|
$ |
243,289 |
|
|
|
($68,609 |
) |
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
(In thousands) |
|
Segments |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
292,437 |
|
|
|
($20,217 |
) |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
272,486 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
339,851 |
|
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
334,731 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
16,463 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,049 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
271,761 |
|
|
|
14,950 |
|
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
284,742 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(7,037 |
) |
|
|
(20,173 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(26,933 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($23,834 |
) |
|
|
($19,175 |
) |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
|
($42,576 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
37,109,146 |
|
|
$ |
6,222,909 |
|
|
|
($5,634,663 |
) |
|
$ |
37,697,392 |
|
|
63
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment
are as follows:
2010
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
71,062 |
|
|
$ |
145,732 |
|
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
219,363 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
73,171 |
|
|
|
35,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,372 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
25,524 |
|
|
|
64,901 |
|
|
|
20,114 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
110,717 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,595 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
47,033 |
|
|
|
121,926 |
|
|
|
14,234 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
183,121 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(14,812 |
) |
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
34,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,128 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
27,026 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
9,330,813 |
|
|
$ |
17,073,027 |
|
|
$ |
426,524 |
|
|
|
($3,664,591 |
) |
|
$ |
23,165,773 |
|
|
2009
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
74,495 |
|
|
$ |
138,279 |
|
|
$ |
3,220 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
216,162 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
94,863 |
|
|
|
56,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,334 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
77,042 |
|
|
|
213,031 |
|
|
|
20,990 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
310,821 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,155 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
49,955 |
|
|
|
123,195 |
|
|
|
14,387 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
187,483 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(24,505 |
) |
|
|
18,527 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,078 |
|
|
$ |
147,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,416 |
|
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
$ |
179,811 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
10,500,488 |
|
|
$ |
17,839,568 |
|
|
$ |
517,035 |
|
|
|
($4,136,764 |
) |
|
$ |
24,720,327 |
|
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segment are
as follows:
2010
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
|
($56 |
) |
|
$ |
78,854 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
119,706 |
|
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,828 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
18,185 |
|
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,559 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
61,721 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,628 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($89,742 |
) |
|
|
($14,372 |
) |
|
|
($56 |
) |
|
|
($104,170 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
11,040,381 |
|
|
$ |
526,937 |
|
|
|
($1,167,451 |
) |
|
$ |
10,399,867 |
|
|
64
2009
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
70,914 |
|
|
$ |
5,269 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
76,520 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
186,552 |
|
|
|
34,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,195 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
(5,074 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
3,771 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
69,944 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,847 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
(7,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($178,749 |
) |
|
|
($35,040 |
) |
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
|
($213,476 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
12,730,112 |
|
|
$ |
715,761 |
|
|
|
($1,231,734 |
) |
|
$ |
12,214,139 |
|
|
A breakdown of intersegment eliminations, particularly revenues, by segment in which the
revenues are recorded follows:
INTERSEGMENT REVENUES*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
Consumer and Retail Banking |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other Financial Services |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
EVERTEC |
|
|
(37,388 |
) |
|
|
(36,209 |
) |
|
Total intersegment revenues
from continuing
operations |
|
|
($37,450 |
) |
|
|
($36,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For purposes of the intersegment revenues disclosure, revenues include interest income
(expense) related to internal funding and other income derived from intercompany
transactions, mainly related to processing / information technology services. |
65
A breakdown of revenues and selected balance sheet information by geographical area follows:
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
308,580 |
|
|
$ |
507,130 |
|
United States |
|
|
89,638 |
|
|
|
59,083 |
|
Other |
|
|
28,565 |
|
|
|
41,004 |
|
|
Total consolidated revenues from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
426,783 |
|
|
$ |
607,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit
accounts, other service fees, net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments
of investment securities, trading account profit (loss), gain (loss) on sale of
loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, and other operating
income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet Information: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,035,181 |
|
|
$ |
22,480,832 |
|
|
$ |
24,067,736 |
|
Loans |
|
|
13,989,155 |
|
|
|
14,176,793 |
|
|
|
14,979,412 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
16,383,261 |
|
|
|
16,634,123 |
|
|
|
16,659,788 |
|
Mainland United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,569,801 |
|
|
$ |
11,033,114 |
|
|
$ |
12,499,283 |
|
Loans |
|
|
8,370,929 |
|
|
|
8,825,559 |
|
|
|
9,862,219 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
7,874,502 |
|
|
|
8,242,604 |
|
|
|
9,428,140 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,227,455 |
|
|
$ |
1,222,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,373 |
|
Loans |
|
|
824,627 |
|
|
|
801,557 |
|
|
|
704,561 |
|
Deposits (2) |
|
|
1,102,549 |
|
|
|
1,048,167 |
|
|
|
1,061,839 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include balance sheet information of the discontinued operations for the
period ended March 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin
Islands. |
Note 26 Subsequent Events
Increase in authorized shares of common stock
On May 4, 2010, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
700,000,000 shares to 1,700,000,000.
Issuance of depository shares
In April 2010, the Corporation raised $1.15 billion through the sale of 46,000,000 depositary
shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of Contingent Convertible Perpetual
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value, $1,000 liquidation preference per share.
The preferred stock represented by depositary shares will automatically convert into shares of
Popular common stock at a conversion rate of 8.3333 shares of common stock for each depositary
share on May 11, 2010, which is the 5th business day after the Corporations common
shareholders approved the amendment to the Corporations restated certificate of incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. The conversion of the preferred stock
will result in the issuance of over 383 million additional shares of common stock. The net proceeds
from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion, after deducting the underwriting
discount and estimated offering expenses.
66
FDIC-assisted transaction
On April 30, 2010, the Corporations banking subsidiary, BPPR (the Bank), acquired certain
assets and assumed certain deposit liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico chartered
non-member bank headquartered in Mayagüez, Puerto Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), as receiver for Westernbank, in an assisted transaction
(herein, the FDIC-assisted transaction).
BPPR
acquired approximately $9.2 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.5 billion in
non-brokered deposit liabilities. No brokered deposit liabilities were assumed. As part of the
transaction, BPPR issued a five-year $5.8 billion note to the FDIC bearing an annual interest
rate of 2.50%. The note is secured by all loans and foreclosed real estate acquired by BPPR from
the FDIC that are subject to the shared-loss agreements and certain related assets.
In connection with the acquisition, BPPR entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC with
respect to approximately $8.7 billion of loans, including single family residential mortgage loans
and commercial loans (referred to collectively as Covered Assets). Pursuant to the terms of the
loss sharing agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to Covered
Assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse BPPR for 80% of
losses with respect to Covered Assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with
respect to losses for which the FDIC paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.
The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC
loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial
loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight
years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.
BPPR also
acquired Westernbank Insurance Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the former Westernbank
and a general insurance agent placing property, casualty, life, and disability insurance, primarily
to mortgage customers of the former Westernbank. No other subsidiaries or other assets were
acquired or liabilities assumed from the former Westernbank or its parent entity, W Holding Company
Inc. The terms of the purchase and assumption agreement provide for the FDIC to indemnify BPPR
against claims with respect to liabilities and assets of the former Westernbank or any of its
affiliates not assumed or otherwise purchased by BPPR and with respect to certain other claims by
third parties.
In addition, as part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received a cash-settled
value appreciation instrument (the Value Appreciation Instrument) in which BPPR agreed to make a
cash payment to the holder thereof equal to the product of (a) 50 million and (b) the amount by
which the average volume weighted price of the Corporations common stock over the two NASDAQ
trading days immediately prior to the date on which the Value Appreciation Instrument is exercised
exceeds $3.43 (the Corporations 20-day trailing average common stock price on April 27). The Value
Appreciation Instrument is exercisable by the holder thereof, in whole or in part, from and
including May 7, 2010 to May 7, 2011.
All of the former Westernbanks 46 branches and offices throughout Puerto Rico have reopened as
branches and offices of BPPR. The physical branch locations and leases were not immediately
acquired by BPPR in the acquisition. BPPR has an option, exercisable until July 29, 2010, to
acquire, at fair market value, any bank premises that were owned by, or any leases relating to bank
premises held by, the former Westernbank (including ATM locations). BPPR is currently reviewing the
bank premises and related leases of the former Westernbank. In addition, BPPR has an option,
exercisable until May 30, 2010, to elect to assume or reject any contracts that provided for the
rendering of services by or to the former Westernbank.
The FDIC-assisted transaction will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, and
as such, the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are to be recognized initially at fair value.
The foregoing amounts represent Westernbanks book value and do not reflect fair value. These
amounts are estimates and, accordingly, are subject to adjustment based upon final settlement with
the FDIC. The Corporation is currently awaiting the final settlement
with the FDIC and, given the limited timeframe since the effective
date of the FDIC-assisted transaction, fair value
determinations on assets acquired and liabilities assumed and
supplemental pro-forma information, to the extent required, are not
available.
67
Other matters
In connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation made a commitment to the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) that, if BPPR was a successful
bidder in an FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation would raise additional Tier 1 capital of at
least $500 million either through the sale of certain assets, which could include a sale of
EVERTEC, BPPRs merchant acquiring business and certain other of Populars financial transaction
processing and technology services operations, or through the issuance of additional Tier 1 capital
to investors, or some combination thereof. If the Corporation does not raise the additional
capital from the sale of assets, it would be required to issue additional Tier 1 capital
securities, which could include, among other things, common stock or preferred stock, to meet this
commitment.
The Corporation has evaluated events subsequent to March 31, 2010 and has determined that there are
no events requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
Note 27 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered
Guaranteed Securities
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI),
Popular North America, Inc. (PNA), and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation as of March 31,
2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, and the results of their operations and cash flows for
the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries: ATH Costa Rica S.A., EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, T.I.I. Smart Solutions
Inc., Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. and PNA.
PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
PFH, including its wholly-owned subsidiary Equity One, Inc.;
and |
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular
Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc. |
PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.
The principal source of income for the PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR. As members subject to
the regulations of the Federal Reserve System, BPPR and BPNA must obtain the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared by each entity
during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the
Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any
required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. The payment
of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as
the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels. As of March 31, 2010, BPPR could have declared
a dividend of approximately $81 million (March 31, 2009 $82 million) without the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board. As of December 31, 2009, BPPR was required to obtain the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31,
2009, BPNA was required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend.
The Corporation has never received dividend payments from its U.S. subsidiaries. Refer to Popular,
Inc.s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further information on dividend
restrictions imposed by regulatory requirements and policies on the payment of dividends by BPPR
and BPNA.
68
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
MARCH 31, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
592,482 |
|
|
|
($1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
1,004,654 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
1,004,753 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,533,693 |
|
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
395,783 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,563 |
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
209,596 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
141,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,864 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,988,199 |
|
|
|
693,198 |
|
|
|
1,130,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,812,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
77,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,180,571 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
23,189,598 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,276,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
77,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,792,296 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
576,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,451 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,887 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
131,094 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
131,243 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,776 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
35,328 |
|
|
|
79,585 |
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
|
|
1,290,748 |
|
|
|
(45,967 |
) |
|
|
1,378,011 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,762 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,511,764 |
|
|
$ |
778,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,827 |
|
|
$ |
33,688,210 |
|
|
|
($5,300,456 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,478,119 |
|
|
|
($1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
4,476,255 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,884,576 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
20,884,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,362,695 |
|
|
|
(2,383 |
) |
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
|
82,323 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
23,263 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
$ |
994,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,914 |
|
|
|
1,103,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
30,086 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
46,075 |
|
|
|
912,685 |
|
|
|
(47,831 |
) |
|
|
941,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,024,563 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
486,089 |
|
|
|
30,322,910 |
|
|
|
(488,374 |
) |
|
|
31,345,236 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,797,328 |
|
|
|
3,497,438 |
|
|
|
3,381,208 |
|
|
|
4,697,181 |
|
|
|
(11,568,917 |
) |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(370,897 |
) |
|
|
(2,700,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,729,863 |
) |
|
|
(1,422,759 |
) |
|
|
6,846,537 |
|
|
|
(377,807 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
(22,530 |
) |
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
|
38,556 |
|
|
|
(33,417 |
) |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
778,044 |
|
|
|
668,738 |
|
|
|
3,365,300 |
|
|
|
(4,812,082 |
) |
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,511,764 |
|
|
$ |
778,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,827 |
|
|
$ |
33,688,210 |
|
|
|
($5,300,456 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
69
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
and |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
677,606 |
|
|
|
($2,488 |
) |
|
$ |
677,330 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
56,144 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
1,002,702 |
|
|
|
(56,338 |
) |
|
|
1,002,797 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694,053 |
|
|
|
(1,787 |
) |
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,777 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,935 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
212,962 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
148,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,046,342 |
|
|
|
733,737 |
|
|
|
1,156,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,936,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
109,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,844,455 |
|
|
|
(126,824 |
) |
|
|
23,827,263 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
109,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,469,161 |
|
|
|
(126,824 |
) |
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
581,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,853 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
125,857 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
126,080 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,505 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
33,828 |
|
|
|
73,308 |
|
|
|
21,162 |
|
|
|
1,242,099 |
|
|
|
(48,238 |
) |
|
|
1,322,159 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,803 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,661,249 |
|
|
$ |
867,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,567 |
|
|
$ |
34,626,784 |
|
|
|
($5,602,590 |
) |
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,497,730 |
|
|
|
($2,429 |
) |
|
$ |
4,495,301 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,485,931 |
|
|
|
(56,338 |
) |
|
|
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,983,661 |
|
|
|
(58,767 |
) |
|
|
25,924,894 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
24,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
107,226 |
|
|
|
(124,825 |
) |
|
|
7,326 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
1,064,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,846 |
|
|
|
1,152,324 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
33,745 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
45,547 |
|
|
|
954,525 |
|
|
|
(49,991 |
) |
|
|
983,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,122,432 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
480,093 |
|
|
|
31,260,526 |
|
|
|
(665,583 |
) |
|
|
32,197,508 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,797,328 |
|
|
|
3,437,437 |
|
|
|
3,321,208 |
|
|
|
4,637,181 |
|
|
|
(11,388,916 |
) |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(285,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,541,802 |
) |
|
|
(2,627,520 |
) |
|
|
(1,329,311 |
) |
|
|
6,491,723 |
|
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(32,321 |
) |
|
|
9,784 |
|
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
16,471 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
867,275 |
|
|
|
703,474 |
|
|
|
3,366,258 |
|
|
|
(4,937,007 |
) |
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,661,249 |
|
|
$ |
867,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,567 |
|
|
$ |
34,626,784 |
|
|
|
($5,602,590 |
) |
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
70
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
MARCH 31, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7,685 |
|
|
$ |
696,327 |
|
|
|
($1,693 |
) |
|
$ |
703,483 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
39,801 |
|
|
|
41,301 |
|
|
|
233,420 |
|
|
|
1,423,560 |
|
|
|
(312,611 |
) |
|
|
1,425,471 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,647 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
436,513 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,523,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,964,238 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,770 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,874 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
318,894 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
195,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,013 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,493,412 |
|
|
|
106,585 |
|
|
|
1,305,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,905,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,206 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
512,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,364,875 |
|
|
|
(521,722 |
) |
|
|
25,355,753 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,767 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
512,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,190,043 |
|
|
|
(521,722 |
) |
|
|
24,180,861 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
602,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,212 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,773 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
140,129 |
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
142,114 |
|
Servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,095 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
29,218 |
|
|
|
68,640 |
|
|
|
21,253 |
|
|
|
1,085,813 |
|
|
|
(27,846 |
) |
|
|
1,177,078 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,440 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,867 |
|
Assets from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,006,720 |
|
|
$ |
222,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,583,042 |
|
|
$ |
37,099,293 |
|
|
|
($5,202,085 |
) |
|
$ |
37,709,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,374,001 |
|
|
|
($1,635 |
) |
|
$ |
4,372,366 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,050,212 |
|
|
|
(272,811 |
) |
|
|
22,777,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,424,213 |
|
|
|
(274,446 |
) |
|
|
27,149,767 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,921,797 |
|
|
|
(39,800 |
) |
|
|
2,881,997 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
37,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,302 |
|
|
|
501,324 |
|
|
|
(519,722 |
) |
|
|
29,453 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
793,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,445,031 |
|
|
|
1,162,732 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
3,399,063 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
43,957 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
|
49,189 |
|
|
|
1,042,136 |
|
|
|
(30,584 |
) |
|
|
1,104,813 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
874,806 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,504,522 |
|
|
|
33,494,623 |
|
|
|
(1,296,552 |
) |
|
|
34,577,514 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,485,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485,287 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,692,209 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,318 |
|
|
|
(56,281 |
) |
|
|
1,692,209 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
487,661 |
|
|
|
2,301,193 |
|
|
|
2,184,964 |
|
|
|
4,291,726 |
|
|
|
(8,769,089 |
) |
|
|
496,455 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(442,561 |
) |
|
|
(2,030,846 |
) |
|
|
(2,097,149 |
) |
|
|
(697,357 |
) |
|
|
4,816,558 |
|
|
|
(451,355 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(90,682 |
) |
|
|
(51,965 |
) |
|
|
(9,297 |
) |
|
|
(42,017 |
) |
|
|
103,279 |
|
|
|
(90,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,131,914 |
|
|
|
222,343 |
|
|
|
78,520 |
|
|
|
3,604,670 |
|
|
|
(3,905,533 |
) |
|
|
3,131,914 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,006,720 |
|
|
$ |
222,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,583,042 |
|
|
$ |
37,099,293 |
|
|
|
($5,202,085 |
) |
|
$ |
37,709,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
87,400 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($94,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
354,508 |
|
|
|
(802 |
) |
|
$ |
354,649 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
64,512 |
|
|
|
(6,842 |
) |
|
|
64,926 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
95,509 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
426,640 |
|
|
|
(102,756 |
) |
|
|
427,195 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,186 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
92,974 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15,986 |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
15,259 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
30,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
19,155 |
|
|
|
(7,020 |
) |
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
128,327 |
|
|
|
(8,018 |
) |
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
65,246 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
298,313 |
|
|
|
(94,738 |
) |
|
|
268,917 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,246 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
58,113 |
|
|
|
(94,738 |
) |
|
|
28,717 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,578 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,878 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
101,320 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Trading account loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Loss on sale
of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,222 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
11,233 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
67,155 |
|
|
|
14,285 |
|
|
|
(8,851 |
) |
|
|
209,438 |
|
|
|
(95,444 |
) |
|
|
186,583 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,434 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,424 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
95,873 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,311 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,187 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,735 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
120,932 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
28,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,876 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,453 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,304 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
24,290 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
27,049 |
|
Communications |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,295 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(10,933 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
40,943 |
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
29,496 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
281,362 |
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
66,504 |
|
|
|
14,269 |
|
|
|
(8,963 |
) |
|
|
(71,924 |
) |
|
|
(94,216 |
) |
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,477 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
66,527 |
|
|
|
14,259 |
|
|
|
(8,963 |
) |
|
|
(62,447 |
) |
|
|
(94,431 |
) |
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(151,582 |
) |
|
|
(109,382 |
) |
|
|
(93,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($95,123 |
) |
|
|
($102,344 |
) |
|
|
($62,447 |
) |
|
$ |
259,914 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
72
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
40,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($40,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
401,531 |
|
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
$ |
401,768 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
3,133 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
10,879 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
69,361 |
|
|
|
(7,015 |
) |
|
|
73,483 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
53,137 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
484,834 |
|
|
|
(51,466 |
) |
|
|
489,192 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,459 |
|
|
|
(2,420 |
) |
|
|
148,039 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
21,980 |
|
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
20,703 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
12,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,944 |
|
|
|
19,506 |
|
|
|
(7,300 |
) |
|
|
47,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,985 |
|
|
|
191,945 |
|
|
|
(11,108 |
) |
|
|
216,706 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
|
40,253 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(20,629 |
) |
|
|
292,889 |
|
|
|
(40,358 |
) |
|
|
272,486 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
40,253 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(20,629 |
) |
|
|
(79,640 |
) |
|
|
(40,358 |
) |
|
|
(100,043 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,741 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,321 |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
98,533 |
|
Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,146 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,823 |
|
Loss on sale
of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,813 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
10,871 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,261 |
|
|
|
(2,690 |
) |
|
|
(21,037 |
) |
|
|
260,038 |
|
|
|
(41,884 |
) |
|
|
234,688 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,323 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,291 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,441 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
25,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,104 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,176 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,256 |
|
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
24,901 |
|
Communications |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,827 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(12,938 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
47,809 |
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
34,234 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
305,760 |
|
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
304,197 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
39,797 |
|
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
|
|
(20,952 |
) |
|
|
(45,722 |
) |
|
|
(39,915 |
) |
|
|
(69,509 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1,628 |
) |
|
|
(25,854 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(26,933 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
39,540 |
|
|
|
(2,732 |
) |
|
|
(19,324 |
) |
|
|
(19,868 |
) |
|
|
(40,192 |
) |
|
|
(42,576 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(82,116 |
) |
|
|
(220,994 |
) |
|
|
(202,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(42,576 |
) |
|
|
(223,726 |
) |
|
|
(221,785 |
) |
|
|
(19,868 |
) |
|
|
465,379 |
|
|
|
(42,576 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
|
($233,672 |
) |
|
|
($231,731 |
) |
|
|
($29,814 |
) |
|
$ |
495,217 |
|
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
73
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($95,123 |
) |
|
|
($102,344 |
) |
|
|
($62,447 |
) |
|
$ |
259,914 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
151,582 |
|
|
|
109,381 |
|
|
|
93,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
Amortization of discount on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,268 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
6,099 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(1,909 |
) |
|
|
(6,563 |
) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(7,716 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,359 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(20,168 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,654 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,975 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(5,238 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
(2,065 |
) |
|
|
5,592 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(15,860 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(16,357 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
(5,515 |
) |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
(5,983 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
151,643 |
|
|
|
102,952 |
|
|
|
96,923 |
|
|
|
253,436 |
|
|
|
(354,755 |
) |
|
|
250,199 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
66,588 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
|
190,989 |
|
|
|
(94,841 |
) |
|
|
165,144 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,796 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
(55,819 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(25,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,844 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,676 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
85,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,446 |
|
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
35,229 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
32,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,953 |
|
|
|
(58,665 |
) |
|
|
398,734 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,049 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
32,260 |
|
|
|
(4,204 |
) |
|
|
(59,981 |
) |
|
|
590,674 |
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
564,265 |
|
|
74
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620,976 |
) |
|
|
56,384 |
|
|
|
(564,592 |
) |
Net decrease in
assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(24,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
(24,903 |
) |
|
|
56,665 |
|
|
|
15,937 |
|
Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(108,624 |
) |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
(124,624 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
|
94,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(99,226 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
65,400 |
|
|
|
(866,787 |
) |
|
|
89,949 |
|
|
|
(814,564 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(85,124 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(85,155 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
677,606 |
|
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
592,482 |
|
|
|
($1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
75
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
|
($233,672 |
) |
|
|
($231,731 |
) |
|
|
($29,814 |
) |
|
$ |
495,217 |
|
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
92,062 |
|
|
|
230,940 |
|
|
|
212,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,049 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
Net loss (gain) on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,146 |
) |
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investments |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred loan
origination fees and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3,568 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(3,493 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,339 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(50,497 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317,338 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,360 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,901 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,367 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(889 |
) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
64,753 |
|
|
|
(49,562 |
) |
|
|
14,039 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
5,797 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
46,864 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
52,769 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
(66,412 |
) |
|
|
49,562 |
|
|
|
(13,936 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(23,497 |
) |
|
|
72,131 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
46,550 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
93,898 |
|
|
|
234,333 |
|
|
|
193,260 |
|
|
|
107,639 |
|
|
|
(535,801 |
) |
|
|
93,329 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
41,376 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
(38,471 |
) |
|
|
77,825 |
|
|
|
(40,584 |
) |
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
49,893 |
|
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
216,826 |
|
|
|
(629,040 |
) |
|
|
(267,810 |
) |
|
|
(630,817 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(245,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,694,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,939,134 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(25,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,770 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,701 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,863 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,546,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,546,944 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
314,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
369,364 |
|
|
|
(346,898 |
) |
|
|
349,877 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,481 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,883 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of a subsidiary |
|
|
(42,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,186 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,915 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
52,295 |
|
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
72,597 |
|
|
|
1,240,595 |
|
|
|
(414,708 |
) |
|
|
950,093 |
|
|
76
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613,692 |
) |
|
|
216,962 |
|
|
|
(396,730 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
(44,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(675,020 |
) |
|
|
49,880 |
|
|
|
(669,611 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(5,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,802 |
|
|
|
(326,961 |
) |
|
|
346,898 |
|
|
|
24,519 |
|
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,149 |
) |
|
|
(3,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,938 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,238 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,625 |
) |
|
|
40,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(42,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,881 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(92,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,109 |
) |
|
|
(1,400,087 |
) |
|
|
454,365 |
|
|
|
(1,072,404 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(81,667 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
(81,504 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7,668 |
|
|
|
777,994 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7,685 |
|
|
$ |
696,327 |
|
|
|
($1,693 |
) |
|
$ |
703,483 |
|
|
77
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report includes managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the consolidated financial
position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular). All
accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be
considered an integral part of this analysis.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding company subject to the
supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation
has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin America. In Puerto Rico,
the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking
subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and equipment leasing and
financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through
specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North
America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing
a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates
branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts
under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The Corporation, through its subsidiary EVERTEC, provides
transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, as well as internally
servicing many of its subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing businesses.
The Corporation reported a net loss of $85.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared
with a net loss of $52.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Table A provides selected
financial data and performance indicators for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The discussion that follows provides highlights of the Corporations results of operations for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the results of operations for the same quarter in 2009. It
also provides some highlights with respect to the Corporations financial condition, credit
quality, capital and liquidity.
Financial highlights:
|
|
|
Net interest income for the first quarter of 2010 declined $3.6 million, compared with
the first quarter of 2009. This decline was primarily due to lower average balances of
earning assets by $4.1 billion, principally loans and investment securities, partially
offset by an increase of 33 basis points on the net interest margin on a taxable equivalent
basis. The decline in the average loan portfolio was influenced by lower origination
activity, loan charge-offs, the sale of most of the lease financing portfolio in the U.S.
mainland operations in early 2009, and the impact of the running-off portfolio related to
the downsizing or discontinuance of certain loan origination units in the U.S. mainland.
Also, the decline in investment securities was associated with the Corporations
deleveraging strategies during 2009. Competitive deposit pricing in the low interest rate
environment helped mitigate the impact of declining asset yields, elevated levels of
non-performing loans, and the increase in the cost of long-term funding. Refer to the Net
Interest Income section in this MD&A for a detailed discussion of the principal factors
that contributed to the variance in net interest income. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased by $132.3
million compared with the same quarter in the previous year. The deteriorated conditions of
the Puerto Rico and U.S. economies that prevailed during 2009, declines in property values,
and slowdown in consumer spending, negatively impacted the Corporations net charge-offs
and non-performing assets levels, thus demanding substantial reserve increases during 2009,
when compared with 2010. Also, the decrease of approximately $2.2 billion in loans
held-in-portfolio since March 31, 2009, particularly in the commercial, construction and
consumer loan portfolios, contributed to the lower level of provision for loan losses for
the first quarter of 2010. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio was 5.53% as of March 31, 2010, compared with
5.32% as of December 31, 2009, and 4.19% as of March 31,2009. Non-performing loans as of March 31, 2010 increased $37 |
78
|
|
|
million, or 2%, compared with December 31, 2009, particularly in mortgage loans by $48 million, or 9%, while other loan
categories remained at closely similar levels, or declined, such as consumer non-performing
loans which were $6 million, or 9%, lower. During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation
experienced improved delinquency trends in certain portfolios, such as home equity lines of
credit and closed-end second mortgages at E-LOAN and non-conventional mortgage loans at
BPNA. Management recognizes that the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland economies remain fragile,
unemployment is still elevated and real estate markets continue to be unstable. Therefore,
it may be early to expect that this recent favorable experience on
non-performing loans in
certain portfolios compared with December 31, 2009 is indicative of a
sustainable longer-term trend. Management continues reinforcing loan
management and workout teams. |
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased $176.9 million,
compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2009, mostly driven by lower net gains on the
sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities by $176.1 million. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $23.3 million compared with
the first quarter of 2009, principally due to lower personnel costs by $24.4 million. The
reduction in personnel costs included reductions associated with the pension,
postretirement medical and savings plans, as well as a reduction in salaries in part due to
headcount reduction, principally in the U.S. mainland operations. Management continues
focused on controlling operating expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit amounted to $9.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
compared with an income tax benefit of $26.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Refer to the Income Taxes section in this MD&A for a discussion on the tax variance and a
reconciliation of the effective tax rate for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Total assets amounted to $33.8 billion as of March 31, 2010, compared with $34.7 billion
as of December 31, 2009 and $37.7 billion as of March 31, 2009. The decline in total
assets, when compared to December 31, 2009, was principally in loans held-in-portfolio by
$635 million, mainly commercial loans, and in the Corporations portfolio of investment
securities available-for-sale by $159 million. The decline in total assets as of March 31,
2010, compared with March 31, 2009, was principally in loans held-in-portfolio by $2.2
billion and in investment securities available-for-sale by $429 million. The decline in the
loan portfolio was influenced by high levels of loan charge-offs and the impact of exiting
origination channels at BPNA as part of the restructuring activities undertaken during
2009. Furthermore, the deteriorated financial environment has required the Corporation to
strengthen its underwriting standards and ensure that it prices its loans appropriately.
As a result of this challenging financial environment, together with caution being
exercised by customers, and managements decision to exit selected businesses, the
Corporation has seen a reduction in the volume of loans. Refer to Table P in the Financial
Condition section of this MD&A for the percentage allocation of the composition of the
Corporations financing to total assets. Deposits totaled $25.4 billion as of March 31,
2010, compared with $25.9 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $27.1 billion as of March 31,
2009. The decrease in deposits occurred principally due to closure, sale and consolidation
of branches in the U.S. mainland operations, and the attrition impact due to
the reduction in the pricing of deposits, including internet deposits. Borrowed funds
amounted to $5.0 billion as of March 31, 2010, compared with $5.3 billion as of December
31, 2009 and $6.3 billion as of March 31, 2009. The reduction in total borrowings from
March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was principally due to deleverage strategies. |
Popular, Inc.s capital ratios continued to exceed all well-capitalized regulatory benchmarks as
of March 31, 2010. Refer to Table J in this MD&A for information on the regulatory capital position
of the Corporation. As explained in the Subsequent Events section in this MD&A, the Corporation
raised net proceeds from the public offering of depository shares effected in April 2010 amounting
to approximately $1.1 billion, which has strengthened the capital and liquidity position of the
parent holding company. Refer to the Statement of Condition and Liquidity Risk sections of this
MD&A for variance explanations and funding sources.
79
As indicated in previous filings with the SEC, in late 2008, the Corporation discontinued the
operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH) by selling assets and closing service branches and
other units. The loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $9.9
million, net of taxes. This loss was primarily related to salary and other expenses incurred in
providing loan portfolio servicing to affiliated companies and other costs for FTEs that were
retained for a transition period. The results of PFH are presented as part of Loss from
discontinued operations, net of income tax in Table A. The discussions in this MD&A pertain to
Popular, Inc.s continuing operations, unless otherwise indicated.
TABLE A
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition Highlights |
|
As of March 31, |
|
Average for the first quarter |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009* |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009* |
|
Variance |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
1,004,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,425,471 |
|
|
|
($420,718 |
) |
|
$ |
891,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,367,413 |
|
|
|
($475,791 |
) |
Investment and trading securities |
|
|
7,282,355 |
|
|
|
8,201,792 |
|
|
|
(919,437 |
) |
|
|
7,252,460 |
|
|
|
8,373,879 |
|
|
|
(1,121,419 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
23,184,711 |
|
|
|
25,546,192 |
|
|
|
(2,361,481 |
) |
|
|
23,344,864 |
|
|
|
25,830,240 |
|
|
|
(2,485,376 |
) |
Total earning assets |
|
|
31,471,819 |
|
|
|
35,173,455 |
|
|
|
(3,701,636 |
) |
|
|
31,488,946 |
|
|
|
35,571,532 |
|
|
|
(4,082,586 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
33,832,437 |
|
|
|
37,709,428 |
|
|
|
(3,876,991 |
) |
|
|
33,916,221 |
|
|
|
38,436,913 |
|
|
|
(4,520,692 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
|
|
27,149,767 |
|
|
|
(1,789,455 |
) |
|
|
25,541,357 |
|
|
|
27,436,228 |
|
|
|
(1,894,871 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
5,043,861 |
|
|
|
6,310,513 |
|
|
|
(1,266,652 |
) |
|
|
5,075,830 |
|
|
|
6,774,776 |
|
|
|
(1,698,946 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
3,131,914 |
|
|
|
(644,713 |
) |
|
|
2,419,165 |
|
|
|
3,112,934 |
|
|
|
(693,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Highlights |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
|
$ |
272,486 |
|
|
|
($3,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
(132,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
157,866 |
|
|
|
334,731 |
|
|
|
(176,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
|
304,197 |
|
|
|
(23,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
|
|
(69,509 |
) |
|
|
(24,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
|
(26,933 |
) |
|
|
17,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of income tax |
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
|
|
(42,576 |
) |
|
|
(42,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($52,522 |
) |
|
|
($32,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($77,200 |
) |
|
|
($7,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations basic and
diluted |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations basic
and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loss per common share basic and
diluted |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statistical Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
|
$ |
5.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share at period end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.02 |
%) |
|
|
(0.55 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.56 |
) |
|
|
(19.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
|
11.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.97 |
|
|
|
12.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes discontinued operations. |
As a financial services company, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by
general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation
are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and
savings, capital market activities, competition,
80
customer preferences, interest rate conditions and
prevailing market rates on competing products. The Corporation continuously monitors general
business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest
rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems
efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies. The Corporation operates in a highly
regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and
regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions could adversely affect its
profitability.
The description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information
about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporations control that,
in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, including Item 1A of Part II, readers
should consider.
The Corporations common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) system under the symbol BPOP.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Increase in authorized shares of common stock
On May 4, 2010, the stockholders of the Corporation approved an amendment to the Corporations
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from
700,000,000 to 1,700,000,000 shares.
Issuance of depository shares
In April 2010, the Corporation raised $1.15 billion through the sale of 46,000,000 depositary
shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of Contingent Convertible Perpetual
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value, $1,000 liquidation preference per share.
The preferred stock represented by depositary shares will automatically convert into shares of
Popular common stock at a conversion rate of 8.3333 shares of common stock for each depositary
share on May 11, 2010, which is the 5th business day after the Corporations common
shareholders approved the amendment to the Corporations restated certificate of incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. The conversion of the preferred stock
will result in the issuance of over 383 million additional shares of common stock. The net proceeds
from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion, after deducting the underwriting
discount and estimated offering expenses.
FDIC-assisted transaction
On April 30, 2010, the Corporations banking subsidiary, BPPR (the Bank), acquired certain
assets and assumed certain deposit liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico chartered
non-member bank headquartered in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), as receiver for Westernbank, in an assisted transaction
(herein, the FDIC-assisted transaction).
BPPR acquired approximately $9.2 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.5 billion in
non-brokered deposit liabilities. No brokered deposit liabilities were assumed. As part of the
transaction, BPPR issued a five-year $5.8 billion note to the FDIC bearing an annual interest
rate of 2.50%. The note is secured by all loans and foreclosed real estate acquired by BPPR from
the FDIC that are subject to the shared-loss agreements and certain related assets.
In connection with the acquisition, BPPR entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC with
respect to approximately $8.7 billion of loans, including single family residential mortgage loans
and commercial loans (referred to collectively as Covered Assets). Pursuant to the terms of the
loss sharing agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to Covered
Assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse BPPR for 80% of
losses with respect to Covered Assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with
respect to losses for which the FDIC paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.
The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC
loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial
loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight
years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.
81
BPPR also
acquired Westernbank Insurance Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the former Westernbank
and a general insurance agent placing property, casualty, life, and disability insurance, primarily
to mortgage customers of the former Westernbank. No other subsidiaries or other assets were
acquired or liabilities assumed from the former Westernbank or
its parent entity, W Holding Company Inc. The terms of the purchase and assumption agreement
provide for the FDIC to indemnify BPPR against claims with respect to liabilities and assets of the
former Westernbank or any of its affiliates not assumed or otherwise purchased by BPPR and with
respect to certain other claims by third parties.
In addition, as part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received a cash-settled
value appreciation instrument (the Value Appreciation Instrument) in which BPPR agreed to make a
cash payment to the holder thereof equal to the product of (a) 50 million and (b) the amount by
which the average volume weighted price of the Corporations common stock over the two NASDAQ
trading days immediately prior to the date on which the Value Appreciation Instrument is exercised
exceeds $3.43 (the Corporations 20-day trailing average common stock price on April 27). The Value
Appreciation Instrument is exercisable by the holder thereof, in whole or in part, from and
including May 7, 2010 to May 7, 2011.
All of the former Westernbanks 46 branches and offices throughout Puerto Rico have reopened as
branches and offices of BPPR. The physical branch locations and leases were not immediately
acquired by BPPR in the acquisition. BPPR has an option, exercisable until July 29, 2010, to
acquire, at fair market value, any bank premises that were owned by, or any leases relating to bank
premises held by, the former Westernbank (including ATM locations). BPPR is currently reviewing the
bank premises and related leases of the former Westernbank. In addition, BPPR has an option,
exercisable until May 30, 2010, to elect to assume or reject any contracts that provided for the
rendering of services by or to the former Westernbank.
The FDIC-assisted transaction will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, and
as such, the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are to be recognized initially at fair value.
The foregoing amounts represent Westernbanks book value and do not reflect fair value. These
amounts are estimates and, accordingly, are subject to adjustment based upon final settlement with
the FDIC. The Corporation is currently awaiting the final settlement
with the FDIC and, given the limited timeframe since the effective date
of the FDIC-assisted transaction, fair value determinations on assets
acquired and liabilities assumed and supplemental pro-forma
information, to the extent required, are not available.
Refer to the Corporations Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 for the Purchase and
Assumption Agreement; Whole Bank; All Deposits, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
receiver of Westernbank, Mayaguez Puerto Rico, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Banco
Popular de Puerto Rico, dated as of April 30, 2010.
Other matters
In connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation made a commitment to the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) that, if BPPR was a successful
bidder in an FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation would raise additional Tier 1 capital of at
least $500 million either through the sale of certain assets, which could include a sale of
EVERTEC, BPPRs merchant acquiring business and certain other of Populars financial transaction
processing and technology services operations, or through the issuance of additional Tier 1 capital
to investors, or some combination thereof. If the Corporation does not raise the additional
capital from the sale of assets, it would be required to issue additional Tier 1 capital
securities, which could include, among other things, common stock or preferred stock, to meet this
commitment.
The Corporation has evaluated events subsequent to March 31, 2010 and has determined that there are
no events requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
82
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 860) Accounting for Transfer of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)
ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage
securitizations when a transferor had not surrendered control over the transferred financial
assets, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and includes additional
disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have
continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most
significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of a
financial asset which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated
affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial
assets or third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the meaning of the term
participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in
its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating interests as defined in
ASC Subparagraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods
within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.
Earlier application was prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions should be applied to
transfers that occur on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date, existing
qualifying special-purpose entities should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities in
accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation adopted
this new authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Corporation evaluated
transfers of financial assets executed during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 pursuant to the new
accounting guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage securitizations (Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
mortgage-backed securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a
significant impact on the Corporations results of operations or financial position for such
period.
A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of
financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control
over the assets transferred and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is accounted for as a sale.
Control is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1)
the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the
assets; and (3) the transferor otherwise no longer maintains effective control over the assets.
When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above
criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the
transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial
asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset
that meets the requirements for sale accounting, or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing
obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated
subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing
asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction
that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
Refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial
assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17) and
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain
Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10)
ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIE) and changes how a
reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity,
if any, has both (a) a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an
83
approach focused on identifying which entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the
obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that
could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This guidance requires
reconsideration of whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts or
circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the
power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance. It also requires ongoing assessments of whether a variable interest holder is the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments to the consolidated guidance
affect all entities that were within the scope of the original guidance, as well as qualifying
special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that were previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17
requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable
interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The
Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The new
accounting guidance on variable interest entities did not have an effect on the Corporations
consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption.
The principal variable interest entities evaluated by the Corporation during the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which
management has concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management
believes that the Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer
to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements).
Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the
attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital
companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810),
Amendment for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU
2009-17 for a reporting entitys interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment
company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial
reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral
allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an
investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that
have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the Investment Company Guide). The FASB
also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing
guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure
requirements in ASU 2009-17.
The Corporation was not required to consolidate existing variable interest entities for which it
has a variable interest as of March 31, 2010. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements for required disclosures associated with the guaranteed mortgage securitizations in
which the Corporation holds a variable interest.
84
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that
disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value
measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in
the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts disclosures
only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of condition or
results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about fair value measurements are presented in
Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception
Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11)
ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded
derivative bifurcation requirements. The credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption is
related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities
that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such
subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in ASU 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each
entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after March 5, 2010. The Corporation does not expect that
the adoption of this standard will have a significant effect, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18,Receivables (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 310) Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for
as a Single Asset (ASU 2010-18)
The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans
subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that
subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides
guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon
acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are
accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans
from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are
not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to
be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within ASC Subtopic 310-40,
ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 are effective
for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first
interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied
prospectively. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of the guidance in ASU
2010-18, an entity may make a onetime election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under
Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an
entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration.
The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2010-18 may have in its
consolidated financial statements.
85
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporations accounting policies,
by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Corporations Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical
accounting policies those related to Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments, Loans and
Allowance for Loan Losses, Income Taxes, Goodwill and Pension and Postretirement Benefit
Obligations. These policies were unchanged from those disclosed by the Corporation as of December
31, 2009. For a summary of the Corporations critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to
that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.s 2009 Financial Review and
Supplementary Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the 2009 Annual Report). Also, refer to
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2009 Annual Report for a summary of
the Corporations significant accounting policies.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income from continuing operations, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented
with its different components on Table B for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the
same period in 2009, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities.
The interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from income
tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are investments in
obligations of the U.S. Government, some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities of the
Puerto Rico Commonwealth and its agencies. Assets held by the Corporations international banking
entities, which previously were tax exempt under Puerto Rico law, have a temporary 5% tax rate. To
facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been
converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates at each
quarter. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by
the Puerto Rico tax law.
Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized
gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the
respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the
origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to
interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums /
discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for
quarter ended March 31, 2010 included a favorable impact of $3.9 million related to these items
compared to a favorable impact of $5.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
86
TABLE B
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations
Quarter ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
|
|
($475 |
) |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
(0.46 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
3,136 |
|
|
|
($2,094 |
) |
|
|
($1,174 |
) |
|
|
($920 |
) |
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
76,174 |
|
|
|
90,752 |
|
|
|
(14,578 |
) |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
(12,632 |
) |
|
452 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
12,561 |
|
|
|
(4,844 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(4,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
|
|
9,741 |
|
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
84,933 |
|
|
|
106,449 |
|
|
|
(21,516 |
) |
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
|
(18,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,150 |
|
|
|
15,775 |
|
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
Commercial * |
|
|
173,042 |
|
|
|
196,192 |
|
|
|
(23,150 |
) |
|
|
(5,335 |
) |
|
|
(17,815 |
) |
|
658 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
8.71 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
14,319 |
|
|
|
19,890 |
|
|
|
(5,571 |
) |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
(6,162 |
) |
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
72,415 |
|
|
|
78,044 |
|
|
|
(5,629 |
) |
|
|
(5,897 |
) |
|
|
268 |
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
|
9.97 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
101,399 |
|
|
|
113,191 |
|
|
|
(11,792 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
(12,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
25,830 |
|
|
|
(2,485 |
) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
361,175 |
|
|
|
407,317 |
|
|
|
(46,142 |
) |
|
|
(9,969 |
) |
|
|
(36,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,489 |
|
|
$ |
35,571 |
|
|
|
($4,082 |
) |
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
|
(0.10 |
%) |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
446,108 |
|
|
$ |
513,766 |
|
|
|
($67,658 |
) |
|
|
($13,278 |
) |
|
|
($54,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,811 |
|
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
|
0.86 |
% |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
(0.46 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market** |
|
$ |
10,243 |
|
|
$ |
15,707 |
|
|
|
($5,464 |
) |
|
|
($5,377 |
) |
|
|
($87 |
) |
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
5,578 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
12,126 |
|
|
|
15,024 |
|
|
|
(2,898 |
) |
|
|
(2,626 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
12,822 |
|
|
|
(1,999 |
) |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
(1.06 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
70,605 |
|
|
|
117,308 |
|
|
|
(46,703 |
) |
|
|
(29,968 |
) |
|
|
(16,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,161 |
|
|
|
23,226 |
|
|
|
(2,065 |
) |
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
92,974 |
|
|
|
148,039 |
|
|
|
(55,065 |
) |
|
|
(37,971 |
) |
|
|
(17,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
|
|
(5,444 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
|
47,964 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
15,279 |
|
|
|
(13,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,237 |
|
|
|
30,001 |
|
|
|
(3,764 |
) |
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
Total
interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
|
216,706 |
|
|
|
(58,428 |
) |
|
|
(23,390 |
) |
|
|
(35,038 |
) |
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,489 |
|
|
$ |
35,571 |
|
|
|
($4,082 |
) |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
(0.43 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
287,830 |
|
|
|
297,060 |
|
|
|
(9,230 |
) |
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
|
|
($19,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
24,574 |
|
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
|
$ |
272,486 |
|
|
|
($3,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category. |
|
* |
|
Includes commercial construction loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
As shown in Table B, the reduction in the Corporations earning assets was the main cause of
the decrease in net interest income. This reduction was influenced by the following:
|
|
|
A reduction in the average balance of investment securities resulting from the sale of
approximately $3.4 billion in investment securities
available-for-sale (mostly Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) notes during the first quarter of 2009, and subsequent reinvestment of
approximately $2.9 billion of the proceeds, primarily in Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA) mortgage-backed securities. The prepayments associated with the GNMA
and collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) portfolios also |
87
|
|
|
contributed to the reduction
in the overall balance of investment securities. |
|
|
|
The Corporation has been closely monitoring excess liquidity balances; when appropriate,
actions have been taken to reduce those balances which carry a negative spread. |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the commercial and construction loan portfolios was mainly the result of
lower origination activity and loan charge-offs. The construction loan portfolio decreased
on average $525 million when compared with the first quarter of 2009. Approximately 72% of
the reduction in average balances of the construction loan portfolio occurred within the
Corporations Puerto Rico operations. The Corporation continues a deleveraging strategy in
its U.S. mainland operations, as a result, 52% of the combined reduction in commercial and
construction loans took place within the U.S. mainland operations. |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the lease portfolio was the result of the sale, during the first quarter
of 2009, of a substantial portion of the Popular Equipment Finance lease portfolio. This
was the result of the Corporations decision to exit the lease financing business in the
U.S. mainland operations. |
|
|
|
|
The mortgage loan portfolios average balance was consistent with the first quarter of
2009 in part due to increased activity in the Puerto Rico market which has offset the
reductions experienced as a result of the Corporations decision to exit certain mortgage
loan origination activity, such as BPNAs non-conventional mortgages and the E-LOAN loan
origination platform in the U.S. mainland. |
|
|
|
|
The consumer loan portfolio has been impacted by a slowdown in the auto and consumer
loan origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off of E-LOANs home equity lines of
credit (HELOCs) and closed-end second mortgages. |
The unfavorable variance explained above was partially offset by a favorable impact to net interest
income resulting from the decrease in deposit volume and borrowings in part associated with
deleveraging driven by the reduction in the earning assets they fund.
In addition, the Corporation experienced an expansion of its net interest margin, on a taxable
equivalent basis. Factors that contributed to this increase were as follows:
|
|
|
A reduction in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities. The Corporation has
taken steps to reduce its cost of interest bearing deposits by reducing the rates offered,
mainly on various certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The impact that these
strategies have on the Corporations liquidity profile is closely monitored. |
|
|
|
|
A reduction in the average balance of short-term investments, which carry a negative
spread versus the cost of financing. |
|
|
|
|
Higher yield in the consumer loans category, mainly reflected in the credit cards
portfolio in part as a result of revisions made to the spread charged over the prime rate
for the different risk categories. |
|
|
|
|
Higher yield in the lease portfolio mainly due to originations being made at higher
rates than the leases maturing in the Puerto Rico portfolio. |
Items that effected negative pressure in the net interest margin included:
|
|
|
The conversion of $935 million of Series C preferred stock to trust preferred securities
in August 2009 contributed to an increase of $16.8 million in interest expense for the
quarter (these payments were characterized as dividends prior to the exchange). This
negative effect was partially offset by the conversion of certain trust preferred
securities into common stock, also in August 2009, which reduced the quarterly interest
expense by $7.4 million. |
|
|
|
|
Rating downgrades that occurred during 2009 also contributed to the increase in the
average cost of long-term debt for the Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
Maturities during 2009 of term notes that carried a lower cost. |
|
|
|
|
Increase in non-performing loans throughout the different loan portfolios, which
balances are depicted in Table K of this MD&A. |
The reduction in the Corporations taxable equivalent adjustment was in part due to the
aforementioned sale of FHLB notes, which are tax-exempt in Puerto Rico, and the subsequent
reinvestment of the proceeds in taxable GNMA securities.
88
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses totaled $240.2 million or 107% of net charge-offs for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared with $372.5 million or 188% of net charge-offs for the first
quarter of 2009. Refer to the Overview section for an explanation of the decrease in the provision
for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 when compared with the same quarter in the
previous year. Also, refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for
a discussion on net charge-offs, non-performing assets and the allowance for loan losses.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Refer to Table C for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the quarters
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
TABLE C
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
50,578 |
|
|
$ |
53,741 |
|
|
|
($3,163 |
) |
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
|
26,593 |
|
|
|
26,373 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
23,297 |
|
|
|
24,005 |
|
|
|
(708 |
) |
Processing fees |
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
13,408 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value
adjustments |
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
4,479 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
10,990 |
|
|
|
12,004 |
|
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
Trust fees |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other fees |
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
Total other service fees |
|
|
101,320 |
|
|
|
98,533 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments
of investment securities |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
176,146 |
|
|
|
(176,065 |
) |
Trading account (loss) profit |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
6,823 |
|
|
|
(7,046 |
) |
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments
to indemnity reserves, and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(12,222 |
) |
|
|
(13,813 |
) |
|
|
1,591 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
13,301 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
157,866 |
|
|
$ |
334,731 |
|
|
|
($176,865 |
) |
|
Service charges on deposits decreased by $3.2 million mostly in the BPNA reportable segment
related to lower non-sufficient funds fees because of lower customer accounts and lower deposits
due to closure and sale of branches and non-balance compensation as a result of revisions in
working capital requirements and pricing structure for its money services clients.
Other service fees for the first quarter of 2010 increased by $2.8 million, compared with the same
quarter in 2009, and was mostly as a result of favorable fair value adjustments recorded because of
the impact of a decrease in prepayments and a lower run-off of the serviced loan portfolio. Refer
to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations servicing
assets and serviced portfolio.
The decrease in non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared with the same
quarter in the previous year, was mostly impacted by $182.7 million in gains derived from the sale
of $3.4 billion in investment securities available-for-sale by BPPR during 2009. The gain recorded
on the sale of these investment securities for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was partially
offset by $6.6 million in other-than-temporary impairments on equity securities.
The decrease in trading account by $7.0 million was mostly related to the Corporations mortgage
banking business.
Loss on sales of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 included an additional amount of $16 million to increase the loss indemnity reserve for mortgage loans
that had been previously sold with
89
credit recourse by the Corporations Puerto Rico operations. This indemnity reserve adjustment was
driven by increased delinquency and loss severity levels experienced in the first quarter of 2010.
The results for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 included an
additional amount of approximately $17.4 million
to the indemnity reserves at the BPNA reportable segment. These indemnity reserves at the BPNA
reportable segment correspond principally to standard representation and warranty arrangements,
including an adjustment of $5.6 million for loans previously sold by E-LOAN and a $11.8 million
representation and warranty reserve established for loans sold by Popular Equipment Finance during
the quarter. The variance in loss on sale of loans for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared
with the same quarter in 2009, was influenced by reduced lower of cost or fair value adjustments in
the BPNA reportable segment loan portfolio held-for-sale by $2.9 million.
Other operating income increased by $5.0 million mainly due to lower credit risk valuation
adjustments on interest rate swaps by $2.2 million and higher revenues by $4.1 million from
investments accounted for under the equity method.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Table D provides a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories.
TABLE D
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
95,873 |
|
|
$ |
105,323 |
|
|
|
($9,450 |
) |
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
|
39,968 |
|
|
|
(14,909 |
) |
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
120,932 |
|
|
|
145,291 |
|
|
|
(24,359 |
) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,876 |
|
|
|
26,441 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
23,453 |
|
|
|
26,104 |
|
|
|
(2,651 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
12,304 |
|
|
|
13,176 |
|
|
|
(872 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
Communications |
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
11,827 |
|
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
Business promotion |
|
|
8,295 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
6,201 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
29,496 |
|
|
|
34,234 |
|
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
280,913 |
|
|
$ |
304,197 |
|
|
|
($23,284 |
) |
|
Personnel expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased by 17%, compared with the
same quarter of the previous year. The decrease in the category of salaries was mainly in the BPNA
reportable segment due to a reduction in headcount from the restructuring of the operations and
branch sales and closures. The Corporations full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) were 9,373 as
of March 31, 2010, compared with 10,186 as of March 31, 2009. BPNA and E-LOAN were the principal
contributors to this reduction with a decrease of 476 FTEs on a combined basis. The reduction in
the category of pension and other benefits was principally as a result of lower costs from the
pension and the savings and investment benefit plans and lower health insurance costs. In 2009,
BPPRs pension plan was frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009.
Also, effective in March 2009, the Corporation suspended its matching contributions to the Puerto
Rico and U.S. subsidiaries savings and investment plans as part of the actions taken to control
costs.
INCOME TAXES
Income tax benefit amounted to $9.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared
with income tax benefit of $26.9 million for the same quarter of 2009. This decrease in income tax
benefit was primarily due to lower capital gain income subject to a preferential tax rate
applicable to Puerto Rico corporations, as well as a reduction in exempt interest income net of
disallowance of expenses attributed to such exempt income. Also, during the quarter ended March 31,
2009, an income tax benefit was recognized as a result of adjusting the deferred tax asset to
reflect
90
the increase in tax rate applicable to Puerto Rico corporations, which was introduced by Act 7 of
the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code.
The components of the income tax benefit for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown
in Table E.
TABLE E
Components of Income Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
|
($38,628 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
($28,464 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
Benefits of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(12,231 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15,762 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,765 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
33,280 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
60,313 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
Adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax
rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,343 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Difference in tax rates due to multiple
jurisdictions |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
State taxes and others |
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
($9,275 |
) |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
($26,933 |
) |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporations
deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2010.
REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS
The Corporations reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico, EVERTEC and Banco Popular North America. A Corporate group has been defined to support
the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate
group are not allocated to the reportable segments. For a description of the Corporations
reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management
accounting process, refer to Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporate group had a net loss of $18.6 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with a
net loss of $19.2 million in the same quarter of the previous year.
Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment reported net income of $27.0 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared with $179.8 million for the same quarter of 2009. The
principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, when compared with the first quarter of 2009, included the following:
|
|
|
higher net interest income by $3.2 million, or 1%, primarily due to a reduction in the
cost of interest bearing deposits, mainly time deposits, including brokered certificates of
deposits, partially offset by a reduction in the yield on earning assets, principally
commercial and mortgage loans, in part due to an increase in non-performing loans, and a
reduction in investment securities and money market investments. The BPPR reportable segment had a net
interest margin of 4.10% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared with 3.70% for the
same quarter in 2009. The favorable variance in net interest income resulting from a higher
net interest margin, was partially offset by the impact of a reduction of $2.0 billion in
average earning assets for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, when compared with first
quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $43.0 million, or 28%, despite an increase of $12.2
million in net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared with the same
quarter in the previous year. The
provision for loan losses in the BPPR reportable segment included higher general reserves
for consumer |
91
|
|
|
loans and specific reserves for construction loans in the first quarter of
2009. The provision for loan losses represented 108% of net charge-offs for the first
quarter of 2010, compared with 171% of net charge-offs for the same quarter of 2009. The
annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio ratio for the BPPR reportable
segment was 2.71% for the first quarter of 2010, compared with 2.26% for the same period in
2009. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR
reportable segment was 4.47% as of March 31, 2010, when compared with 3.89% as of March 31,
2009. As of March 31, 2010, there were $1.1 billion of loans individually evaluated for
impairment in the BPPR reportable segment with a related allowance for loan losses of $200
million, compared with $773 million and $179 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2009.
Although the volume of loans individually evaluated for impairment increased in a greater
proportion that the corresponding allowance for loan losses, for a significant number of
these loans, management has determined that the value of the collateral is adequate to cover
any related losses. Non-performing loans in this reportable segment totaled $1.6 billion at
March 31, 2010, compared with $0.9 billion at the same date in 2009, mainly related to
construction, commercial and mortgage loans. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan
Quality section of this MD&A for certain credit quality indicators corresponding to the BPPR
reportable segment; |
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $200.1 million, or 64%, mainly due to lower net gains on
the sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities. As previously indicated,
non-interest income for the first quarter of 2009 included gains of $182.7 million
associated with the sale of $3.4 billion of investment securities by BPPR. Also, there was
lower trading account profit in the first quarter of 2010 by $7.0 million associated with
the mortgage banking business. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by lower
credit risk valuation adjustments on interest rate swaps for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 and higher other service fees. The latter was mainly the result of a favorable
variance in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, partially offset by lower
insurance fees; |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $5.3 million, or 3%, mainly due to lower personnel costs by
$8.0 million, principally lower pension, savings plans and postretirement benefit plan
expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $4.1 million. Refer to the Income Taxes section of this
MD&A for additional information. |
EVERTEC
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the EVERTEC reportable segment had net income of $10.2
million, compared with $9.9 million for the same quarter in the previous year. The principal
factors that contributed to the variance in results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, when
compared with the first quarter of 2009, included:
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $0.7 million, or 1%, primarily due to higher income
derived from point-of-sale (POS) processing, network services and payment services,
higher business process outsourcing, which are mainly related to electronic benefit
transfer fees, and equity pickup in various investments, partially offset by lower
technology consulting development services and item processing fees; |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $1.6 million, or 3%, primarily due to lower personnel costs
and equipment expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $2.0 million, or 39%, mostly due to current income taxes
and a remeasurement adjustment on foreign tax provision. |
Banco Popular North America
Banco Popular North America reportable segment, which includes the operations of E-LOAN, reported a
net loss of $104.2 million, a decrease of $109.3 million, or 51%, when compared with the financial
results of the first quarter of 2009. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in
results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, when compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
included:
|
|
|
higher net interest income by $2.3 million, or 3%, which was mainly due to a reduction
in the cost of time deposits and money market deposit accounts, partially offset by lower
loan yields on average total loans, influenced in part by the high levels of non-performing
loans. The favorable variance resulting from a higher net interest margin was partially
offset by a reduction in average earning assets by $1.7 billion, principally in loans by
$1.5 billion; |
|
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $89.4 million, or 40%. This decrease in the provision
for loan losses was mainly the result of higher amounts provisioned during 2009,
particularly for commercial and construction loans, non-conventional residential mortgage
loans, home equity lines of credit, and closed-end second
mortgages, combined with specific reserves recorded for loans considered impaired. The
deteriorated |
92
|
|
|
conditions of U.S. economy, declines in property values, and the slowdown in
consumer spending, negatively impacted the net charge-offs and non-performing assets levels
in 2009, thus demanding substantial reserve increases during that year. The decrease of
approximately $1.4 billion in loans held-in-portfolio since March 31, 2009, particularly in
the commercial, construction consumer and mortgage loan portfolios, also contributed to the
lower level of provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2010. Net charge-offs for
the BPNA reportable segment in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 amounted to $123.8 million,
compared with $109.9 million for the same quarter in the previous year. The provision for
loan losses represented 106% of net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2010, compared with
201% of net charge-offs for the same quarter in 2009. The ratio of annualized net
charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment was 5.87% for
the first quarter of 2010, compared with 4.50% for the same period in 2009. As of March 31,
2010, there were $622 million of individually evaluated impaired loans in the BPNA
reportable segment with a specific allowance for loan losses of $145 million, compared to
$369 million and $100 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010,
BPNA reportable segment non-performing loans were $213 million higher than those reported as
of March 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio in this
reportable segment was 7.44% as of March 31, 2010, compared with 4.68% as of March 31, 2009.
Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for certain credit
quality indicators corresponding to the BPNA reportable segment; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $12.8 million, mainly due to lower unfavorable adjustments
to indemnity reserves on loans sold. Refer to the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A
for further details on the indemnity reserve adjustments at the BPNA reportable segment for
the first quarter of 2009. Furthermore, there was a reduction in service charges on
deposit accounts by $2.9 million, which was also explained in the Non-Interest Income
section; |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $14.6 million, or 18%. This variance was principally the
result of lower personnel costs by $13.5 million mainly due to the reduction in FTEs as a
result of downsizing of the operations, and lower equipment expenses by $0.9 million; and |
|
|
|
|
higher income taxes of $9.8 million, or 109%, mostly due to the partial reversal of the
valuation allowance as a result of a tax refund from the IRS during the first quarter of
2009. |
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations total assets were $33.8 billion, compared with $34.7
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $37.7 billion as of March 31, 2009. Refer to the consolidated
financial statements included in this report for the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition as of such dates.
Table F provides a breakdown of the Corporations portfolio of investment securities
available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) on a combined basis as of March 31, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Also, Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements
provide additional information with respect to the Corporations AFS and HTM investment securities.
TABLE F
Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
113.0 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,705.3 |
|
|
|
1,647.9 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
1,682.6 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
259.5 |
|
|
|
262.8 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
382.6 |
|
|
|
(123.1 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,477.5 |
|
|
|
1,600.2 |
|
|
|
(122.7 |
) |
|
|
1,623.9 |
|
|
|
(146.4 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
3,068.5 |
|
|
|
3,210.2 |
|
|
|
(141.7 |
) |
|
|
3,170.7 |
|
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Others |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
243.2 |
|
|
|
(240.4 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,745.3 |
|
|
$ |
6,907.7 |
|
|
|
($162.4 |
) |
|
$ |
7,283.1 |
|
|
|
($537.8 |
) |
|
93
The portfolio of investment securities consists primarily of very liquid, high quality
securities. The reduction in investment securities from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was
principally in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations and was impacted
mostly by prepayments. The decline in the investment securities from March 31, 2009 to the same
date in 2010 was mainly associated with sales, maturities and prepayments of investment securities.
The proceeds from these activities were not fully reinvested as part of a strategy to deleverage
the balance sheet.
As of March 31, 2010, there were investment securities AFS and HTM with a fair value of $1.4
billion in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses on these particular securities
approximated $18.9 million as of March 31, 2010. These figures compare with securities of $1.8
billion with unrealized losses of $30.6 million as of December 31, 2009. Management performed its
quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010.
Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was
other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation does not
have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely
than not that the Corporation will have to sell those investment securities prior to recovery of
their amortized cost basis. Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements provide
additional information by investment categories of the unrealized gains / losses with respect to
the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio.
Refer to Table G, for a breakdown of the Corporations loan portfolio, the principal category of
earning assets. Included in Table G are $106 million of loans held-for-sale as of March 31, 2010,
compared with $91 million as of December 31, 2009 and $308 million as of March 31, 2009. All loan
portfolios as of March 31, 2009 declined compared with December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, which
generally reflects the slowdown in loan origination activity, the increase in loan charge-offs as a
result of the downturn in the real estate market and continued weakened economy, and the exiting or
downsizing of certain loan origination channels due to strategic decisions.
TABLE G
Loans Ending Balances (including loans held-for-sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 (2) |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
12,264,799 |
|
|
$ |
12,666,955 |
|
|
|
($402,156 |
) |
|
$ |
13,412,344 |
|
|
|
($1,147,545 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
1,620,769 |
|
|
|
1,724,373 |
|
|
|
(103,604 |
) |
|
|
2,156,435 |
|
|
|
(535,666 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
(21,895 |
) |
|
|
773,934 |
|
|
|
(120,200 |
) |
Mortgage (1) |
|
|
4,739,486 |
|
|
|
4,691,145 |
|
|
|
48,341 |
|
|
|
4,733,535 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
(139,884 |
) |
|
|
4,469,944 |
|
|
|
(564,021 |
) |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
23,184,711 |
|
|
$ |
23,803,909 |
|
|
|
($619,198 |
) |
|
$ |
25,546,192 |
|
|
|
($2,361,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes residential construction loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Loans disclosed exclude the discontinued operations of PFH. |
As of March 31, 2010, the commercial and construction loans portfolios decreased $506 million
when compared to December 31, 2009. Most of the decrease in these portfolios was reflected in the
BPNA reportable segment by $310 million, impacted by commercial and construction net charge-offs
during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 amounting to $71 million, portfolio run-off associated with
exited origination channels and lower new loan origination activity. The BPPR reportable segments
commercial and construction loan portfolio declined by $198 million from December 31, 2009 mostly
as a result of net charge-offs, portfolio run-off and the continued slowdown mainly in commercial
and construction loan originations in Puerto Rico. The decline in commercial and construction loans
from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was reflected principally in the BPPR and BPNA reportable
segments by $785 million and $907 million, respectively. This declined was influenced by similar
factors as described above.
The decrease in the consumer loan portfolio from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 by
approximately $140 million, or 3%, was mostly reflected in personal loans and auto loans in Puerto
Rico and home equity lines of credit in E-LOAN. Net charge-offs in the consumer loan portfolio
amounted to $63 million for the quarter ended March
94
31, 2010. Also, portfolio run-off exceeded the volume of new personal and auto loan originations in
the BPPR reportable segment due to current weak economic conditions. Furthermore, the run-off of
Popular Finances loan portfolio contributed to such decrease. Popular Finances operations were
closed in late 2008. Also, there were reductions in the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA
reportable segment, primarily due to loan charge-offs and the run-off of its auto, closed-end
second mortgages and home equity lines of credit portfolios, which represent business lines exited
in prior years. Consumer loans as of March 31, 2010 decreased significantly from March 31, 2009 as
a result of similar factors.
The decline in the lease financing portfolio from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was mostly at
the BPPR reportable segment by $15 million, which as well as the other loan portfolios continues to
reflect the general slowdown in originations. The Corporations U.S. operations are no longer
originating lease financing and as such, the outstanding portfolio in those operations is running
off.
The mortgage loan portfolio as of March 31, 2010 increased $48 million from December 31, 2009. The
BPPR reportable segment showed an increase of $99 million, while the BPNA reportable segment
experienced a reduction $50 million. The reduction at BPNA resulted principally from the
discontinuance of the non-conventional mortgage loan origination business in the Corporations U.S.
mainland operations. The Corporations mortgage loan origination subsidiary in Puerto Rico, Popular
Mortgage, continued its efforts to continue originating loans despite the oversupply of housing
developments, the decline in the volume of sales and the weak economic conditions in the Island.
There is a reduction from March 31, 2009 in BPNA due to high volume of net charge-offs in
the non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio and run-off of the portfolio.
Table H provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of Other
assets in the consolidated statements of condition as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009.
TABLE H
Breakdown of Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Net deferred tax assets
(net of valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
366,224 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
364,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
234,008 |
|
|
|
232,387 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
226,695 |
|
|
|
7,313 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
193,166 |
|
|
|
206,308 |
|
|
|
(13,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,166 |
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
125,387 |
|
|
|
130,762 |
|
|
|
(5,375 |
) |
|
|
121,293 |
|
|
|
4,094 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
106,147 |
|
|
|
99,772 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
94,691 |
|
|
|
11,456 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
72,356 |
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
|
|
(28,453 |
) |
Trade receivables from brokers and counterparties |
|
|
57,536 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
56,432 |
|
|
|
46,533 |
|
|
|
11,003 |
|
Others |
|
|
223,187 |
|
|
|
216,037 |
|
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,378,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,159 |
|
|
$ |
55,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,177,078 |
|
|
$ |
200,933 |
|
|
The increase in other assets from December 31, 2009 is primarily due higher trade receivables
from brokers and counterparties, which are mostly related to higher mortgage-backed securities sold
by Popular Mortgage prior to quarter-end, with settlement date in April 2010. When compared to
March 31, 2009, the major variance was reflected in the prepaid FDIC insurance assessment, which
represents the unamortized balance of the FDIC insurance premiums prepaid in 2009, which correspond
to years 2010 through 2012.
95
Deposits and Borrowings
A breakdown of the Corporations deposits at period-end is included in Table I.
TABLE I
Deposits Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, 2010 Vs. |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, 2010 Vs. |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Demand deposits * |
|
$ |
5,040,104 |
|
|
$ |
5,066,282 |
|
|
|
($26,178 |
) |
|
$ |
4,936,682 |
|
|
$ |
103,422 |
|
Savings, NOW and money market deposits |
|
|
9,791,033 |
|
|
|
9,635,347 |
|
|
|
155,686 |
|
|
|
9,744,582 |
|
|
|
46,451 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
10,529,175 |
|
|
|
11,223,265 |
|
|
|
(694,090 |
) |
|
|
12,468,503 |
|
|
|
(1,939,328 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,360,312 |
|
|
$ |
25,924,894 |
|
|
|
($564,582 |
) |
|
$ |
27,149,767 |
|
|
|
($1,789,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. |
Brokered certificates of deposit, which are included as time deposits, amounted to $2.4
billion as of March 31, 2010, compared with $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009.
The decrease in time deposits from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010, excluding brokered
certificates of deposit, occurred both in the Corporations Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland banking
operations. The reduction in time deposits was principally in retail deposits influenced in part by
the continued reduction in the pricing of certificates of deposit. There was also a decrease in
time deposits for corporate accounts, which was offset by increases in commercial savings accounts.
The decrease in deposits from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 of $1.8 billion or 7% was mostly at
the BPNA reportable segment, which reflected a decrease of $1.6 billion. The decrease at BPNA was
mainly in time deposits and brokered certificates of deposit, which were impacted by the closure
and sale of branches of BPNA. In addition, there were reduced levels of deposits gathered through
E-LOANs internet platform, in part influenced by the effect of a reduction in the pricing of these
deposits and strategic actions taken that reduced BPNAs asset base considerably.
The Corporations borrowings amounted to $5.0 billion as of March 31, 2010, compared with $5.3
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $6.3 billion as of March 31, 2009. The decline in borrowings
from the end of 2009 to the end of the first quarter of 2010 was the result of lower repurchase
agreements by $141 million and lower term notes by $76 million due to the exercise of a put option
by a note holder during the quarter. The reduction in borrowings from March 31, 2009 to March 31,
2010 was mostly reflected in repurchase agreements by $390 million, mainly due to deleverage
strategies, and in term notes by $832 million, principally due to lower volume of earning assets to
fund at the U.S. mainland operations due to downsizing.
In March 2010, the SECs Division of Corporation Finance sent a letter to certain public companies
requesting information about repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or other
transactions involving the obligation to repurchase the transferred assets. The letter requests
several disclosures with respect to such transfers that are recorded as sales. In this regard, the
Corporation records all its repurchase transactions as collateralized borrowings rather than as
sales transactions.
In August 2009, the Corporation issued junior subordinated debentures with an aggregate liquidation
amount of $936 million as part of the exchange agreement with the U.S. Treasury. As of March 31,
2010, the outstanding book balance of these debentures was $429 million since it is reported net of
a discount amounting to $507 million. The discount resulted from the recording of the debentures at
fair value because of the accounting treatment of the exchange. The aforementioned increase in
junior subordinated debentures was partially offset by the reduction in previously outstanding
junior subordinated debentures of $410 million, associated with the exchange of trust preferred
securities for common stock. Refer to the 2009 Annual Report for information on the exchange
transactions.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the
Corporations borrowings as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Also, refer to
the Liquidity Risk section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporations funding
sources as of March 31, 2010.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders
equity totaled $2.5 billion as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, compared with
$3.1 billion as of March 31, 2009. Refer to the consolidated statements of condition and of
stockholders equity for information on the composition of stockholders equity. Also, the
disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an
96
integral component of stockholders equity, are included in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss. The decrease in stockholders equity from March 31, 2009 to March 31,
2010 was mainly related to the net loss recorded during 2009 and first quarter of 2010.
Included within surplus in stockholders equity as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $402
million corresponding to a statutory reserve fund applicable exclusively to Puerto Rico banking
institutions. This statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of March 31, 2009. The Banking
Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net income for the
year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of
paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged
to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be
used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Ricos Commissioner of Financial
Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying
dividends. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, BPPR was in compliance with the
statutory reserve requirement.
REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking
regulations. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009
are presented on Table J. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.
TABLE J
Capital Adequacy Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
$ |
2,426,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,563,915 |
|
|
$ |
3,210,878 |
|
Supplementary (Tier II) capital |
|
|
371,025 |
|
|
|
346,527 |
|
|
|
368,693 |
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
2,797,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,910,442 |
|
|
$ |
3,579,571 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items |
|
$ |
22,100,603 |
|
|
$ |
23,182,230 |
|
|
$ |
25,494,204 |
|
Off-balance sheet items |
|
|
3,401,589 |
|
|
|
2,964,649 |
|
|
|
3,280,294 |
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
25,502,192 |
|
|
$ |
26,146,879 |
|
|
$ |
28,774,498 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
33,060,219 |
|
|
$ |
34,197,244 |
|
|
$ |
37,610,007 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (minimum required 4.00%) |
|
|
9.51 |
% |
|
|
9.81 |
% |
|
|
11.16 |
% |
Total capital (minimum required 8.00%) |
|
|
10.97 |
|
|
|
11.13 |
|
|
|
12.44 |
|
Leverage ratio * |
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted
quarterly average assets, depending on the banks classification. |
As of March 31, 2010, the capital adequacy minimum requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in
thousands): Total Capital of $2,040,175, Tier I Capital of $1,020,088, and Tier I Leverage of
$991,807 based on a 3% ratio or $1,322,409 based on a 4% ratio according to the Banks
classification.
Assuming the Corporations offering of $1.15 billion of depository shares and the
FDIC-assisted transaction previously described in the Subsequent Events section of this MD&A had
been completed as of March 31, 2010, the Corporations regulatory capital ratios as of March 31,
2010 would have approximated Tier 1 risk-based capital of 12.5%, Total risk-based capital of 13.8%
and Tier 1 leverage of 8.4%. These pro-forma ratios are based on estimated risk-weighted assets
approximating $28.6 billion and do not include the impact of fair value measurements or any
potential purchase accounting gain or goodwill generated from the transaction since the volume of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed is not final as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q.
The Corporation is in the process of determining fair values for acquisition accounting.
97
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board capital guidelines, trust preferred securities
represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). As of March 31,
2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements exceeded the 25% limitation and, as such,
$40 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities were disallowed as Tier 1 capital,
compared with $7 million as of December 31, 2009. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in
excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations.
The Federal Reserve Board revised the quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital
elements included in the Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital
elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred
tax liability. The new quantitative limits were scheduled to become effective on March 31, 2009.
However, on March 23, 2009, the Federal Reserve adopted a rule extending the compliance date for
the tighter limits to March 31, 2011 in light of the stressful financial conditions and the
severely constrained ability of bank holding companies to raise additional capital in the markets.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 5.40% as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009. The Corporations Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio was 6.12% as of March 31, 2010,
compared with 6.39% as of December 31, 2009.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures.
Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital
adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets,
typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any other
measure calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (GAAP). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common
equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies
reporting measures with similar names.
The table that follows provides a reconciliation of total stockholders equity to tangible common
equity and total assets to tangible assets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share or per share information) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,487,201 |
|
|
$ |
2,538,817 |
|
Less: Preferred stock |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(41,762 |
) |
|
|
(43,803 |
) |
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
1,790,930 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(41,762 |
) |
|
|
(43,803 |
) |
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
33,186,326 |
|
|
$ |
34,088,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
639,539,900 |
|
|
|
639,540,105 |
|
Tangible book value per common share |
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios
calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and
management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the
Corporations capital position. In connection with the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program
(SCAP), the Federal Reserve Board began supplementing its assessment
98
of the capital adequacy of a bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as
Tier 1 common equity.
Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in
the federal banking regulations, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and
are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to
calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these
non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company,
they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
The table below reconciles the Corporations total common stockholders equity (GAAP) as of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 to Tier 1 common equity as defined by the regulations issued by the
Federal Reserve Board, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies (non-GAAP).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,437,041 |
|
|
$ |
2,488,657 |
|
Less: Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax (1) |
|
|
(122,325 |
) |
|
|
(91,068 |
) |
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets (2) |
|
|
(210,142 |
) |
|
|
(179,655 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Other disallowed intangibles |
|
|
(14,467 |
) |
|
|
(18,056 |
) |
Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments |
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges (3) |
|
|
78,373 |
|
|
|
78,488 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
1,561,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,671,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt
securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values. In arriving at Tier 1 capital,
institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of
tax. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $165 million of the Corporations $366 million of net deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2010 ($186
million and $364 million, respectively as of December 31, 2009), were included without limitation in regulatory capital
pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $210 million of such assets as of March 31, 2010
($180 million as of December 31, 2009) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred
tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $9 million of the Corporations other net
deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2010 ($2 million as of December 31, 2009) represented primarily the following items
(a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted
to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines; (b)
the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other
comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill and other intangibles. |
|
(3) |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the impact of pension liability adjustment. |
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY
Non-performing assets include past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest,
renegotiated loans and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including
certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table K.
The Corporations non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are
as follows:
|
|
|
Commercial and construction loans recognition of interest income on commercial and
construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on
payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of
principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions on these loans are charged-off at
no longer than 365 days past due; |
|
|
|
|
Lease financing recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when
loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in
arrears; |
99
|
|
|
Mortgage loans recognition of interest income on
mortgage loans is generally discontinued when
loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired
portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. |
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and
home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears
on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer
loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end
consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end
consumer loans are charged-off when 180 days in arrears; and |
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) Loans classified as TDRs are reported in
non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification.
The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a
willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of
sustained performance after classified as a TDR). |
TABLE K
Non-Performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
percentage |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
of loans |
|
Vs. |
|
|
March 31, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
HIP (1) |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
by category |
|
2009 |
|
by category |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
by category |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
836,509 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
$ |
836,728 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
($219 |
) |
|
$ |
524,577 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
311,932 |
|
Construction |
|
|
852,095 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
854,937 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
(2,842 |
) |
|
|
435,383 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
416,712 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
7,837 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(5,433 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
558,384 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
510,847 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
47,537 |
|
|
|
352,812 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
205,572 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
58,431 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
64,185 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(5,754 |
) |
|
|
77,860 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(19,429 |
) |
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
2,313,256 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
2,276,352 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
36,904 |
|
|
|
1,403,902 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
909,354 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
134,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
95,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,114 |
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
2,448,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,401,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,499,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
948,468 |
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
252,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
239,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,852 |
|
|
$ |
214,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,473 |
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
55.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HIP = held-in-portfolio |
As of March 31, 2010, non-performing loans secured by real estate amounted to $1.4 billion or
16.03% of total loans secured by real estate in the Puerto Rico operations and $658 million or
10.47%, respectively, in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $1.3 billion or
14.92% in the Puerto Rico operations and $697 million or 10.69% in the U.S. mainland operations as
of December 31, 2009.
In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table K, there were $274 million of performing
loans as of March 31, 2010, which in managements opinion are currently subject to potential future
classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared with $248 million as of
December 31, 2009 and $388 million as of March 31, 2009.
100
Table L summarizes the detail of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including
charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
TABLE L
Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
|
$ |
378,397 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
(132,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,501,404 |
|
|
|
1,255,336 |
|
|
|
246,068 |
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
86,952 |
|
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
38,125 |
|
Construction |
|
|
52,407 |
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
31,593 |
|
|
|
(2,991 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
70,390 |
|
|
|
83,398 |
|
|
|
(13,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
243,841 |
|
|
|
214,572 |
|
|
|
29,269 |
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Construction |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7,885 |
|
|
|
7,437 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,473 |
|
|
|
16,361 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
Net loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
79,117 |
|
|
|
41,336 |
|
|
|
37,781 |
|
Construction |
|
|
51,438 |
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
6,630 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
27,374 |
|
|
|
31,148 |
|
|
|
(3,774 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
62,505 |
|
|
|
75,961 |
|
|
|
(13,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
224,368 |
|
|
|
198,211 |
|
|
|
26,157 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,277,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,057,125 |
|
|
$ |
219,911 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
1.07x |
|
|
|
1.88x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table M presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio by loan
category for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
TABLE M
Annualized Net Charge-offs to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
8.16 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
101
Commercial loans
The level of non-performing commercial loans as of March 31, 2010 and the percentage of
non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans held-in-portfolio, which is shown in Table K,
remained relatively stable compared with December 31, 2009. The substantial increase in
non-performing commercial loans from March 31, 2009 was due to the continuing downturn in the U.S.
economy and Puerto Ricos recessionary economy. The table that follows provides information on
commercial non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
512,822 |
|
|
$ |
516,184 |
|
|
$ |
343,748 |
|
Non-performing commercial loans
to commercial loans HIP |
|
|
7.36 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
4.67 |
% |
Commercial loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
32,700 |
|
|
$ |
42,843 |
|
|
$ |
14,613 |
|
Commercial loans net
charge-offs to average
commercial loans HIP |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
323,620 |
|
|
$ |
320,477 |
|
|
$ |
180,830 |
|
Non-performing commercial loans
to commercial loans HIP |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
Commercial loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
46,418 |
|
|
$ |
50,093 |
|
|
$ |
26,723 |
|
Commercial loans net
charge-offs to average
commercial loans HIP |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
1.76 |
% |
There were
6 commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with
an outstanding debt of approximately $86 million as of March 31, 2010, compared with 5 commercial loan
relationships with an outstanding debt of approximately $100 million as of December 31, 2009, and
one commercial loan relationship with an outstanding debt of $17 million as of March 31, 2009.
The increase in the Corporations commercial loan net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2009, was mostly associated with the deteriorated
economic conditions reflected across all industry sectors both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland
operations. Particularly in the U.S. mainland, the commercial
segments which continue to report high levels of net
charge-offs in 2010 were primarily small businesses and commercial real estate as a result of
the depressed economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to commercial loans
held-in-portfolio represented 3.77% of that portfolio as of March 31, 2010, compared with 3.46% as
of December 31, 2009. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans in the commercial loan
category was 55.28% as of March 31, 2010, compared with 52.31% as of December 31, 2009.
The Corporations commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (CRE), excluding construction
loans, amounted to $7.4 billion as of March 31, 2010, of which $3.3 billion was secured with owner
occupied properties, compared with $7.5 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, as of December 31,
2009. CRE non-performing loans amounted to $597 million or 8.10% of CRE loans as of March 31, 2010,
compared to $557 million or 7.41%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The CRE non-performing
loans ratios for the Corporations Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations were 9.18% and 6.85%,
respectively, as of March 31, 2010, compared with 8.29% and 6.39%, respectively, as of December 31,
2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations commercial loan portfolio included a total of $168 million
worth of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $2 million for the BPNA reportable
segment, which were considered TDRs since they involved granting a concession to borrowers under
financial difficulties. The outstanding commitments for these commercial loan TDRs amounted to $1
million in the BPPR reportable segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA reportable
segment
as of March 31, 2010. The commercial loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $33 million for the BPPR reportable
segment and $1 million for the BPNA reportable segment as of March 31, 2010.
102
Construction loans
As shown in Table K, non-performing construction loans decreased $3 million from December 31, 2009
to March 31, 2010, resulting from a decrease in the BPNA reportable segment, offset by an increase
in the BPPR reportable segment. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction
loans held-in-portfolio increased from 49.6% as of December 31, 2009 to 52.6% as of March 31, 2010,
after considering a reduction of $104 million in construction loans held-in-portfolio, principally
in the BPPR reportable segment. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction
loans held-in-portfolio was 20.2% as of March 31, 2009.
There were
22 construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status
with an outstanding debt of $554 million as of March 31, 2010, mostly related to the Puerto Rico
operations, compared with 22 construction loan relationships with an outstanding debt of $544
million as of December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, there were 12 construction loan
relationships with an outstanding debt of $220 million in non-performing status. The construction
loans in non-performing status for both reportable segments are primarily residential real estate
construction loans which have been adversely impacted by general market conditions, decreases in
property values, oversupply in certain areas and reduced absorption rates. In the current stressed
housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become one of the most important
factors in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of the allowance for
loan losses.
The increase in construction loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared
with the same quarter in the previous year was related to both BPPR and BPNA reportable segments.
The construction loan portfolio is currently considered one of the
higher-risk portfolios of the
Corporation. Management has identified construction loans considered impaired and has established
specific reserves based on the value of the collateral. The allowance for loan losses corresponding
to construction loans represented 21.45% of that portfolio as of March 31, 2010, compared with
19.79% as of December 31, 2009. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans in the construction
loans category was 40.75% as of March 31, 2010, compared with 39.92% as of December 31, 2009.
The BPPR reportable segments construction loan portfolio totaled $1.0 billion as of March 31,
2010, compared with $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2009. The
allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable
segment totaled $219 million or 21.17% of construction loans held-in-portfolio as of March 31, 2010
compared to $215 million or 19.86%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The table that follows
provides certain credit quality information on BPPR reportable segments construction loan
portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
629,300 |
|
|
$ |
604,610 |
|
|
$ |
256,217 |
|
Non-performing construction loans
to construction loans HIP |
|
|
60.58 |
% |
|
|
55.86 |
% |
|
|
18.30 |
% |
Construction loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
26,657 |
|
|
$ |
59,667 |
|
|
$ |
23,902 |
|
Construction loans net
charge-offs (annualized) to average
construction loans HIP |
|
|
10.07 |
% |
|
|
20.68 |
% |
|
|
6.66 |
% |
103
The BPNA reportable segment construction loan portfolio totaled $580 million as of March 31,
2010, compared with $642 million as of December 31, 2009 and $756 million as of March 31, 2009. The
allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPNA reportable
segment totaled $128 million or 24.84% of construction loans held-in-portfolio as of March 31, 2010
compared to $126 million or 21.69%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The table that follows
provides certain credit quality information on BPNA reportable segments construction loan
portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
222,795 |
|
|
$ |
250,327 |
|
|
$ |
179,166 |
|
Non-performing construction loans
to construction loans HIP |
|
|
38.41 |
% |
|
|
38.99 |
% |
|
|
23.68 |
% |
Construction loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
24,780 |
|
|
$ |
32,976 |
|
|
$ |
20,907 |
|
Construction loans net
charge-offs (annualized) to average
construction loans HIP |
|
|
16.16 |
% |
|
|
19.84 |
% |
|
|
10.98 |
% |
The construction loan portfolio included a total of $218 million worth of loan modifications
for the BPPR reportable segment and $99 million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were
considered TDRs as of March 31, 2010. The outstanding commitments for these construction loan TDRs
as of March 31, 2010 amounted to $52 million for the BPPR reportable segment and $2 million for the
BPNA reportable segment. These construction loan TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment
resulting in a reserve of $30 million for the BPPR reportable segment and $18 million for the BPNA
reportable segment as of March 31, 2010.
In the current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become
the most important factor in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of
the allowance for loan losses. The likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded
investment for a real estate loan is remote. However, in some cases during recent quarters
declining real estate values have resulted in the determination that the estimated value of the
collateral was insufficient to cover all of the recorded investment in the loans.
Mortgage loans
Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $48 million from December 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010, principally associated with the BPPR reportable segment, partially offset by a
reduction in the BPNA reportable segment. Non-performing mortgage loans increased by $206
million from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010. As shown in
Table M, the decline in the ratio of mortgage loan net
charge-offs to average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
compared with the same quarter in the previous year, was mainly due to lower mortgage loan net
charge-offs in the BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio.
The level of mortgage loan net charge-offs in the Corporations Puerto Rico operations continued to
increase. Deteriorated economic conditions in Puerto Rico have continued to adversely impact
mortgage delinquency rates, increasing the level of non-performing mortgage loans and credit
losses. The slowdown in the housing sector in Puerto Rico has put pressure on home prices and
reduced sales activity, thus increasing the level of losses.
104
The following table presents some credit quality indicators for the BPPR reportable segments
mortgage loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
377,524 |
|
|
$ |
311,918 |
|
|
$ |
225,050 |
|
Non-performing mortgage loans
to mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
11.68 |
% |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
7.84 |
% |
Mortgage loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
$ |
2,669 |
|
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
Mortgage loans net charge-offs (annualized)
to average mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
The BPNA reportable segment mortgage loan portfolio totaled $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2010,
compared with $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $1.6 billion as of March 31, 2009. Even though the
BPNA mortgage loan portfolio experienced an improvement in delinquency trends during the first
quarter of 2010, the volume of loans in the process of foreclosure
and consistent high level of
net charge-offs continue to reflect difficult economic conditions and falling real estate values.
Although certain states are experiencing a turnaround in their economy, many others, including
Florida and Illinois, still exhibit a sluggish economic recovery. The following table presents some
credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segments mortgage loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
179,376 |
|
|
$ |
197,748 |
|
|
$ |
126,846 |
|
Non-performing mortgage loans
to mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
12.69 |
% |
|
|
13.49 |
% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
Mortgage loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
23,785 |
|
|
$ |
27,834 |
|
|
$ |
29,140 |
|
Mortgage loans net charge-offs (annualized)
to average mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
BPNAs
non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 amounted to approximately $1.0 billion with a related allowance for loan losses of $119 million, which represents
11.76% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $1.1 billion with a related allowance for loan losses of $118 million or 11.16%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The
Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA. Net charge-offs for
BPNAs non-conventional portfolio totaled $21.7 million with a ratio of 8.37% of annualized net
charge-offs to average non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, compared with $24.5 million and 8.20%, respectively, as of March 31, 2009.
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio reported a total of $195 million worth of loan
modifications considered TDRs as of March 31, 2010, compared with $187 million as of December 31,
2009. Although the criteria for specific impairment excludes large groups of smaller-balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it
specifically requires its application to modifications considered TDRs. These mortgage loan TDRs
were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $61 million as
of March 31, 2010, compared with a specific allowance for loan losses of $52 million as of December
31, 2009.
Consumer loans
The decrease in non-performing consumer loans from $64 million as of December 31, 2009 to $58
million as of March 31, 2010 was primarily associated with the BPNA reportable segment which
decreased by $6 million. Non-performing consumer loans decreased by $19 million from March 31, 2009
to March 31, 2010. Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans
held-in-portfolio decreased mostly due to lower delinquencies in the U.S. mainland and in Puerto
Rico.
Non-performing consumer loans in the BPPR reportable segment increased by $1 million from December
31, 2009 to March 31, 2010, and $6 million from March 31, 2009. The increase from March 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010 was
principally in auto loans. The decrease in the ratio of consumer loans
net charge-offs to average
consumer loans
105
held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was mainly attributed to personal
loans and credit cards. The following table presents some credit quality indicators for the BPPR
reportable segments consumer loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
37,278 |
|
|
$ |
36,695 |
|
|
$ |
31,390 |
|
Non-performing consumer
loans to consumer loans HIP |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
Consumer loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
35,164 |
|
|
$ |
37,527 |
|
|
$ |
43,191 |
|
Consumer loans net
charge-offs (annualized) to average
consumer loans HIP |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
The following table presents some credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segments
consumer loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
21,153 |
|
|
$ |
27,490 |
|
|
$ |
46,470 |
|
Non-performing consumer
loans to consumer loans HIP |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
Consumer loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
27,341 |
|
|
$ |
40,888 |
|
|
$ |
32,770 |
|
Consumer loans net
charge-offs to average
consumer loans HIP |
|
|
11.53 |
% |
|
|
16.27 |
% |
|
|
10.75 |
% |
|
The decrease in non-performing consumer loans for the BPNA reportable segment was mainly
attributed to E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages. As of March 31,
2010, approximately $11 million or 2.19% of E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and closed-end
second mortgages were in non-performing status, compared with $16 million or 2.89% as of December
31, 2009, and $32 million or 4.76%, respectively, as of March 31, 2009. These loan portfolios
showed signs of improved performance during the first quarter of 2010 due to aggressive collection
efforts and loan modification programs. Combined net charge-offs for E-LOANs home equity lines of
credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to approximately $19.5 million or 14.81% of those particular average
loan portfolios for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this
subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans. Home equity lending includes both home equity
loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on
the borrowers residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate
market values as of the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit
extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOANs
portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding as of March
31, 2010 totaled $506 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $84 million, representing
16.58% of that particular portfolio. E-LOANs portfolio of home equity lines of credit and
closed-end second mortgages outstanding as of December 31, 2009 totaled $539 million with a related
allowance for loan losses of $95 million, representing 17.59% of that particular portfolio.
Other real estate
Other real estate, which represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, increased by
$9 million from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
This increase was principally due to similar increases in the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments, including both commercial and
residential properties. With the slowdown in the housing market caused primarily by a persistent
economic deterioration in certain geographical areas, there has been a softening effect on the
market for resale of repossessed real estate properties. As a result, defaulted loans have
increased, and these loans move through the default process to the other real estate
classification. The combination of increased flow of defaulted loans from the loan portfolio to
other real estate owned and the slowing of the liquidation market has resulted in an increase in
the number of other real estate units on hand.
106
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are composed primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other
insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations financial
statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the
option to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due
90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions
that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the sellers /
servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under
recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans
purchased from other financial institutions, which are in the process
of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Refer to the 2009 Annual Report for a detailed description of the Corporations accounting policy
for determining the allowance for loan losses and for the Corporations definition of impaired
loans.
Tables N and O set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations allowance
for loan losses (ALLL) as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by loan category and by whether
the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for
specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.
TABLE N
Composition of Allowance for Loan Losses as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
120,419 |
|
|
$ |
160,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
345,605 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
662,697 |
|
|
|
841,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754,979 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired
loans |
|
|
18.17 |
% |
|
|
19.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.69 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
342,023 |
|
|
$ |
186,849 |
|
|
$ |
18,653 |
|
|
$ |
100,081 |
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
|
$ |
931,431 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
11,587,894 |
|
|
|
777,785 |
|
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
4,397,984 |
|
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
21,323,320 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
24.02 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
462,442 |
|
|
$ |
347,244 |
|
|
$ |
18,653 |
|
|
$ |
164,872 |
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,036 |
|
Total loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
12,250,591 |
|
|
|
1,618,828 |
|
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
4,649,223 |
|
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
23,078,299 |
|
ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
21.45 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
107
TABLE O
Composition of Allowance for Loan Losses as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
108,769 |
|
|
$ |
162,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
323,887 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
645,513 |
|
|
|
841,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673,621 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired
loans |
|
|
16.85 |
% |
|
|
19.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.35 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
328,940 |
|
|
$ |
178,412 |
|
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
102,400 |
|
|
$ |
309,007 |
|
|
$ |
937,317 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
12,018,546 |
|
|
|
883,012 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
4,416,498 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
22,039,492 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
20.20 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
437,709 |
|
|
$ |
341,319 |
|
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
154,611 |
|
|
$ |
309,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
Total loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
12,664,059 |
|
|
|
1,724,373 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
4,603,245 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
23,713,113 |
|
ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
19.79 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
The increase in the allowance for loan losses from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was
primarily attributable to increased reserves for commercial and mortgage loans, partially offset by
a decline in the reserve for consumer loans. The construction loan portfolio continues to maintain
the highest allowance coverage due to the persistent deterioration of the economic and housing
market conditions in Puerto Rico, and also in the U.S. mainland. The increase in the allowance for
loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio as of March 31, 2010 was mainly attributed to BPNA.
The increase in the allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans from December 31, 2009 to March
31, 2010 was influenced by the high level of delinquent mortgages and higher loss severity,
particularly in Puerto Rico. The reduction in the allowance for loan losses for the consumer loan
portfolio was mainly driven by recent improved performance trends in certain portfolios, including
decreased levels of delinquencies and charge-offs, combined with portfolio reductions in the Puerto
Rico and U.S. mainland operations.
The Corporations recorded investment in commercial, construction and mortgage loans that were
considered impaired and the related valuation allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
(In millions) |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance required |
|
$ |
1,329.0 |
|
|
$ |
345.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.3 |
|
|
$ |
323.9 |
|
|
$ |
903.1 |
|
|
$ |
279.2 |
|
No valuation allowance required |
|
|
426.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,755.0 |
|
|
$ |
345.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,673.6 |
|
|
$ |
323.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,141.7 |
|
|
$ |
279.2 |
|
|
With respect to the $426 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for
which no allowance for loan losses was required as of March 31, 2010, management followed the
guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the
impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired
loan discounted at the loans original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of
the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A
loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the
underlying collateral. The $426 million impaired commercial and construction loans were collateral
dependent loans in which management performed a detailed analysis based on the fair value of the
collateral less estimated costs to sell and determined that the collateral was deemed adequate to
cover any losses as of March 31, 2010.
Average impaired loans during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1.7 billion and $1.0
billion, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired loans of $4.5 million
and $4.2 million for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
108
The following tables set forth an analysis of the activity in the specific reserves for impaired
loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
108,769 |
|
|
$ |
162,907 |
|
|
$ |
52,211 |
|
|
$ |
323,887 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
50,750 |
|
|
|
48,429 |
|
|
|
18,981 |
|
|
|
118,160 |
|
Less: Net charge-offs |
|
|
39,100 |
|
|
|
50,941 |
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
96,442 |
|
|
Specific ALLL as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
120,419 |
|
|
$ |
160,395 |
|
|
$ |
64,791 |
|
|
$ |
345,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
61,261 |
|
|
$ |
119,566 |
|
|
$ |
13,895 |
|
|
$ |
194,722 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
35,409 |
|
|
|
95,213 |
|
|
|
13,958 |
|
|
|
144,580 |
|
Less: Net charge-offs |
|
|
16,743 |
|
|
|
37,571 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
60,106 |
|
|
Specific ALLL as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
79,927 |
|
|
$ |
177,208 |
|
|
$ |
22,061 |
|
|
$ |
279,196 |
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated
impaired loans amounted to approximately $96.4 million, principally from the BPNA reportable
segment. These net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 consisted mostly of
construction loan net charge-offs of $50.9 million, of which $26.3 million pertained to the BPPR
reportable segment and $24.6 million to the BPNA reportable segment.
Due to the weakened economic conditions, the Corporations credit quality will continue to remain
stressed in 2010, principally in mortgage-related assets. The sustained low absorption levels
could result in further deterioration in property values, particularly in Puerto Rico.
Other commitments to extend credit
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $6.7 billion as of March
31, 2010 and $7.0 billion as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Commercial letters of credit and standby letters of
credit amounted to $18 million and $124 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2010; $13 million
and $134 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2009; and $18 million and $189 million,
respectively, as of March 31, 2009. In addition, the Corporation has commitments to originate
mortgage loans amounting to $43 million as of March 31, 2010, $48 million as of December 31, 2009
and $86 million as of March 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $10 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit, compared to $15 million as of December 31, 2009. The estimated reserve is principally
based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the
corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance for loan losses
methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from the allowance
for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of
condition.
Geographical and government risk
As explained in the 2009 Annual Report, the Corporation is exposed to geographical and government
risk. The Corporations assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business
segment reporting are presented in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
A significant portion of the Corporations financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated
in Puerto Rico.
Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy has been experiencing recessionary conditions. Based on
information
109
published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board (the Planning Board), the Puerto Rico
real gross national product decreased 3.7% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
In 2010, the Puerto Rico economy should benefit from the disbursement of approximately $2.5 billion
from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and $280.3 million from the
Commonwealths local stimulus package.
This decline in the Islands economy has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in the
Corporations loan originations; an increase in the level of its non-performing assets, loan loss
provisions and charge-offs, particularly in the Corporations construction and commercial loan
portfolios; an increase in the rate of foreclosures on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value
of the Corporations loans and loan servicing portfolio, all of which have adversely affected its
profitability. If the decline in economic activity continues, there could be further adverse
effects on the Corporations profitability.
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has had an
adverse effect on the credit quality of the Corporations loan portfolios. The persistent economic
slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase in the
short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may
also impact growth in the Corporations other interest and non-interest revenues.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had $1.1 billion of credit facilities granted to or
guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, of which $215 million were
uncommitted lines of credit. Of these total credit facilities granted, $841 million were
outstanding at March 31, 2010. A substantial portion of the Corporations credit exposure to the
Government of Puerto Rico is either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source
of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior
and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services
or products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees
of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from
it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good
faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their
repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts
as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. Another
portion of these loans consists of special obligations of various municipalities that are payable
from the basic real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities.
Furthermore, as of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had outstanding $260 million in obligations of
Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions as part of its investment securities portfolio.
Refer to Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of that
total, $255 million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its
municipalities. Of this portfolio, $53 million are in the form of Puerto Rico Commonwealth
Appropriation Bonds, of which $43 million were rated Ba1 as of March 31, 2010, one notch below
investment grade, by Moodys, while Standard & Poors Rating Services rates them as investment
grade. Subsequently, on April 16, 2010, Moodys rating was changed to Baa1 (investment grade). As
of March 31, 2010, the Puerto Rico Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds represented approximately $2.6
million in unrealized losses in the investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
portfolios. Management will continue monitoring those securities as part of its ongoing OTTI
assessments.
As further detailed in Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial
portion of the Corporations investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in
the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well
as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GNMA. In addition, $343 million of residential
mortgages and $329 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or
its agencies as of March 31, 2010.
110
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not
recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are
different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. As a provider of financial
services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the
financial needs of its customers which may include loan commitments and standby
letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process
used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial
position. Other types of off-balance sheet arrangements that the Corporation enters in the ordinary
course of business include derivatives, operating leases and provision of guarantees,
indemnifications, and representation and warranties.
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial
commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal
course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to
future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding
agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum
quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined
as purchase obligations.
There were no significant changes in other contractual obligations, such as purchases obligations,
capital leases, and operating leases, or pension and postretirement liabilities, and uncertain tax
positions as of March 31, 2010, when compared with December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements for information on commitments and guarantees.
The Liquidity Section of this MD&A provides a breakdown of the Corporations borrowings and
certificates of deposit by year of maturity.
As previously indicated, the Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is
required either to receive or pay cash, depending on fluctuations in interest rates. These contracts are
carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of condition with the fair value representing
the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of
interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as
interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin
calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements for a description of the Corporations derivative activities.
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, Popular is required to deposit cash or qualifying
securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously
pledged as collateral declines as a result of changes in interest rates, the Corporation will be
required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby
adversely affecting its liquidity.
The Corporation also utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of
business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporations exposure to credit
losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is
represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit
procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in
extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon,
the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporations actual future credit
exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.
The contractual amounts related to the Corporations off-balance sheet lending and other
activities, including commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters
of credit, commitments to originate mortgage loans and unfunded investment obligations, amounted to
$6.9 billion as of March 31, 2010, compared with $7.2 billion as of December 31, 2009.
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of
these matters (except for the matters
111
described in the Legal Proceedings section in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements
which are in very early stages and as to which the actions of which currently cannot be predicted)
will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity.
Guarantees associated with loans sold / serviced
The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may have sold, in bulk
sale transactions, residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse or to certain
representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and
warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral,
prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans
under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.3 billion, compared with $4.5 billion as of
December 31, 2009, in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally
loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant
to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation may be required to repurchase the loan or
reimburse for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future
payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the
event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the
residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the
Corporation repurchased approximately $18 million in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse
provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the
underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans
when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are
less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and
the costs of holding and disposing of the related property. Historically, the losses associated to
these credit recourse arrangements, which pertained to residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico,
have not been significant. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations liability established to cover
the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted
to $29 million, compared with $16 million as of December 31, 2009.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which
are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private
investors, or may sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the
extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the
Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses. Quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation as required
under the government agency programs to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The
Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial
statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representation and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA,
and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors,
including FHLMC, require the Corporation to
advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such
payments have not been received from the borrowers. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced
$17.6 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit recourse, compared with
$17.7 billion as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant
to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is
foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee
programs. However, in the interim, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances
during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting
to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not
cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the
Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. As of March 31,
2010, the amount of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements
was approximately $21 million, compared with $14 million as of December 31, 2009. To the extent the
112
mortgage loans underlying the Corporations servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies,
the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its
obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases
in collection efforts.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representation and
warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN. Loans had been sold to investors on
a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. The loans had been sold prior to 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation and
warranty arrangements amounted to $32 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in
the consolidated statement of condition, compared with $33 million as of December 31, 2009. E-LOAN
is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities during
2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected losses associated
to E-LOANs customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates
expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The
analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loans funding date
and the loan repurchase date as observed in the historical loan data. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, E-LOAN charged-off approximately $3 million against this representation and
warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases and indemnification
or make-whole events. Make-whole
events are typically defaulted cases which the investor attempts to recover by collateral or
guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered portion of the loan.
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or
warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. These
sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. The agreements primarily include indemnification for
breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time
period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do
not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability
defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporations reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $10 million, compared
with $9 million as of December 31, 2009. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation
recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFHs representation and warranty arrangements amounting
to approximately $0.5 million. The reserve balance as of March 31, 2010 contemplates historical
indemnity payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement
of premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligations for defaulted loans within a
short-term timeframe, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America
have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification
obligations.
During 2009, the Corporation sold a lease portfolio of approximately $0.3 billion. As of March 31,
2010, the reserve established to provide for any losses on the breach of certain representations
and warranties included in the associated sale agreements amounted to $4 million, compared with $6
million as of December 31, 2009. This reserve is included as part of other liabilities in the
consolidated statement of condition.
113
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets,
available-for-sale securities, derivatives and mortgage servicing rights. Occasionally, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as
loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain
other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level
hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation
methodology used for fair value measurement are observable. The hierarchy is broken down into three
levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant
degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that
are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3- Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial asset or liability.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about what market
participants would use to price the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.
The inputs are developed based on the best available information, which might include the
Corporations own data such as internally-developed models and discounted cash flow
analyses. |
The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use
of unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the
fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the availability of quoted market prices or
observable market parameters. In addition, it may be affected on other factors such as the type of
instrument, the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the
valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument.
If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that
primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities,
credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When
market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more
subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results
from diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of
market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on
modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as
interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation
adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is
adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.
Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations fair
value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. As of March 31, 2010,
approximately $6.8 billion, or 94%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used
market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore, were
classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value are classified
as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities,
obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed securities
(MBS) and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), and derivative instruments. U.S. Treasury
securities are valued based on yields that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury
curve. Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities are priced based on an active exchange
market and on quoted prices for similar securities. Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions are valued based on trades, bid price or spread, two sided markets, quotes,
benchmark curves, market data feeds, discount and capital rates and trustee reports. MBS and CMOs
are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and
market sector. Refer to the Derivatives section below for a description of the valuation techniques
used to value these instruments.
114
As of March 31, 2010, the remaining 6% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were
classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs.
The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly tax exempt mortgage-backed securities
guaranteed by GNMA and FNMA and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Agency tax exempt
mortgage-backed securities are priced using a local demand price matrix prepared from local dealer
quotes, and other local investments such as corporate securities and local mutual funds which are
priced by local dealers. MSRs, on the other hand, are priced internally using a discounted cash
flow model which considers servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions,
delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic
factors. Additionally, the Corporation reported $386 million of financial assets that were measured
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2010, all of which were classified as Level 3
in the hierarchy.
Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the
market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants.
Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $245 million as of March 31,
2010, of which $239 million were Level 3 assets and $6 million were Level 2 assets. These assets
consisted principally of tax-exempt agency mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these
securities is based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative
local broker quotes, and adjusted for additional inputs obtained from industry sources for FNMA
tax-exempt mortgage-backed securities. The main input used in the matrix pricing is non-binding
local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities are
classified as Level 3.
There were no significant changes in the Corporations valuation methodologies as of March 31, 2010
when compared with December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for
a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for the assets and liabilities
measured at fair value as of March 31, 2010. Also, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies /
Estimates in the 2009 Annual Report for additional information on the accounting guidance and the
Corporations policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities
available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate
pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented
and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporations financial statements.
Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and
investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and
the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers
or broker dealers.
Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the
relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the
pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument,
such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is
not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with
brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on
similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument.
If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it
discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, none of the
Corporations investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service
providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is
concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.
Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least
on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses
that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of
the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit
ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics
and market liquidity. At
the end of each quarter, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability
measured. The fair
115
value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation
procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and level hierarchy
changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale amounted to $6.9 billion and represented 97% of the Corporations assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of March 31, 2010, net unrealized gains on the
trading and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $20 million and $140
million, respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporations trading and investment securities
available-for-sale are classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale
classified as Level 3, which are the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment,
represent only 3% of the Corporations total portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale.
Derivatives
Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in
over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate
benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on
present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and
have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of
these derivatives held by the Corporation are classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative
assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance
risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporations own credit risk, is
determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the
collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation.
The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the
creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral
received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of
default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit
approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties credit condition, enters into master
netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives
resulted in a net loss of $1.4 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense
captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $1.9 million
resulting from the Corporations own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $0.5 million from the
assessment of the counterparties credit risk.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), which amounted to $173 million as of March 31, 2010, do not
trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon
discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions.
The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows
(e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash
flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service,
escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations.
Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan
portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporations loan characteristics and portfolio
behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have been historically lower. Other assumptions are,
in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key
economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a
sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Subsection 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar
locations, size and supply and demand. Continued deterioration of the housing markets and the
economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to
real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are
reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.
116
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, which
include interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and
the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices
because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate
risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and
financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.
The Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible
for planning and executing the Corporations market, interest rate risk, funding activities and
strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Corporations risk
management committee. In addition, a Market Risk Manager, who is part of the risk management group,
has been appointed to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market
risks, and independently monitor and report adherence with established policies. The ALCO meets on
a monthly basis and reviews various asset and liability sensitivities, ratios and portfolio
information, including but not limited to, the Corporations liquidity positions, projected sources
and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.
Interest rate risk (IRR), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a
predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. The
techniques for measuring the potential impact of the Corporations exposure to market risk from
changing interest rates that were described in the 2009 Annual Report were the same as those
applied by the Corporation as of March 31, 2010.
Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a
tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting
from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation
model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or
costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its
composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and
maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process,
emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.
Management assesses interest rate risk using various interest rate scenarios that differ in
direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the
projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of interest rate scenarios processed
include most likely economic scenarios, flat or unchanged rates, yield curve twists, +/- 200 and +
400 basis points parallel ramps and +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs
analyses to isolate and measure basis and yield curve risk exposures and prepayment risk. The asset
and liability management group also performs validation procedures on various assumptions used as
part of the sensitivity analysis as well as validations of results on a monthly basis. Due to the
importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate
third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporations deposits and interest
rate scenarios.
The Corporation runs net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the
yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios
considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis
points during the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2011. Under a 200 basis points rising rate
scenario, projected net interest income increases by $71.0 million, while under a 400 basis points
rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $138.0 million. These scenarios
were compared against the Corporations flat or unchanged interest rates forecast. Given the fact
that as of March 31, 2010 some market interest rates continued to be close to zero, management has
focused on measuring the risk on net interest income in rising rate scenarios.
117
Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. They should not be relied upon as
indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management
could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking
computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.
The projected net interest income from which this disclosure is based does not give effect to the
application of the proceeds of the recently completed depositary shares offering or to the impact
of the FDIC-assisted transaction described in the Subsequent Events section of this MD&A.
The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (EVE) to changes in
interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporations assets minus the
estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure
long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows,
including principal and interest, from all future periods.
EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis.
The shock scenarios consist of +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management has defined limits
for the increases / decreases in EVE resulting from the shock scenarios. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporation was in compliance with these limits.
The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the
use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income
or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives
is subject to interest rate fluctuations and, as a result, could have a positive or negative effect
in the Corporations net interest income. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements
for further information on the Corporations derivative instruments.
Foreign Exchange
The Corporation conducts business in certain Latin American markets through several of its
processing and information technology services and products subsidiaries. Also, it holds interests
in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. (BHD) in
the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these businesses are conducted in the
countrys foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment, from operations
for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, is reported in accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of condition, except for highly-inflationary
environments in which the effects would be included in other operating income in the consolidated
statements of operations.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had approximately $40 million in an unfavorable foreign
currency translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss, compared to an
unfavorable adjustment of $41 million as of December 31, 2009.
EVERTEC, Inc. operates in Venezuela through its wholly-owned subsidiary EVERTEC Venezuela. On
January 7, 2010, Venezuelas National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) for December 2009 was released.
The cumulative three-year inflation rates for both of Venezuelas inflation indices were over 100
percent. The Corporation calculated the cumulative three-year inflation rate on a blended basis by
using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for 2006 and 2007, and the NCPI for 2008 and 2009. The
blended CPI/NCPI reached cumulative three-year inflation in excess of 100% as of November 30, 2009.
Therefore, the Corporation began considering Venezuelas economy as highly inflationary as of
January 1, 2010, and the financial statements of EVERTEC Venezuela were remeasured as if the
functional currency was the reporting currency as of such date. ASC Section 830-10-45-11 defines a
highly inflationary economy as one with a cumulative inflation rate of approximately 100 percent or
more over a three-year period. Under ASC Topic 830, if a countrys economy is classified as highly
inflationary, the functional currency of the foreign entity operating in that country must be
remeasured to the functional currency of the reporting entity. The impact of the remeasurement of
the financial statements of EVERTEC Venezuela as of March 31, 2010, using the parallel market
rate of Bs6.98/US$1, was approximately $2.2 million, which was included in the category of other
operating income in the consolidated statement of operations. Total assets for EVERTEC Venezuela
remeasured at the parallel market rate approximated $5 million as of March 31, 2010.
118
LIQUIDITY
The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation remains
sufficiently liquid to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and
maintains a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market
conditions. An institutions liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is
downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event
causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is also exposed to
liquidity risk if the markets on which it depends on are subject to temporary disruptions.
The Corporation obtains liquidity from both sides of the balance sheet as well as from
off-balance-sheet activities. Liquid assets can be quickly and easily converted to cash at a
reasonable cost, or are timed to mature when management anticipates a need for additional
liquidity. The Corporations investment portfolio, including money markets such as fed funds sold
and loans that can be pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York (Fed), are used to manage Populars liquidity needs. On the liability side,
diversified sources of deposits and secured credit facilities provide liquidity to Populars
operations. Even if some of these alternatives may not be available temporarily, it is expected
that in the normal course of business, the Corporations funding sources are adequate.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for
the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing
under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are
temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the
pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in
place with the FHLB and the Fed. The Corporation has a substantial amount of assets available for
raising funds through these channels.
Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits,
continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 75% of the
Corporations total assets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. These
borrowings consisted primarily of FHLB borrowings, securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and term notes. Refer to Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements for the composition of the Corporations borrowings as of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. There were no significant fluctuations in the Corporations
borrowings composition from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
The composition of the Corporations financing to total assets as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 is included in Table P.
TABLE P
Financing to Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% decrease from |
|
% of total assets |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, 2009 to |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Non-interest bearing
deposits |
|
$ |
4,476 |
|
|
$ |
4,495 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Interest-bearing core
deposits |
|
|
15,142 |
|
|
|
14,983 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
Other interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Other short-term
borrowings |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
228.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Others |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the
banking and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and
non-banking subsidiaries.
119
The maturities of certificates of deposits and borrowings for the Corporation as of March 31, 2010,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of |
|
Repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
deposits |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
6,379,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,329,316 |
|
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
$ |
338,837 |
|
|
$ |
8,071,321 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,892,628 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,260 |
|
|
|
2,464,888 |
|
2012 |
|
|
860,677 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,917 |
|
|
|
1,567,594 |
|
2013 |
|
|
422,408 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,780 |
|
|
|
601,188 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,335 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
711,159 |
|
Later years |
|
|
623,222 |
|
|
|
638,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,809 |
|
|
|
1,728,221 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
10,529,175 |
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
3,036,427 |
|
|
|
16,080,371 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(507,335 |
) |
|
|
(507,335 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,529,175 |
|
|
$ |
2,491,506 |
|
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
$ |
2,529,092 |
|
|
$ |
15,573,036 |
|
|
The following sections provide further information on the Corporations major funding
activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities.
Banking Subsidiaries
Primary sources of funding for the Corporations banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or the
banking subsidiaries, include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, collateralized
borrowings and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. Also, BPNA has received substantial capital
contributions in order to maintain its well-capitalized status. In addition, the Corporations
banking subsidiaries maintain borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the
Fed, and have a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds
under these facilities. The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan
originations, investment portfolio purchases, repayment of maturing obligations (including
deposits), operational expenses, and in the case of BPPR, dividend payments to the holding company.
Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for
some derivative transactions and recourse obligations; off-balance sheet activities mainly in
connection with contractual commitments; recourse provisions; servicing advances; derivatives and
support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR.
The bank operating subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in
funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available
liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form
of balances maintained at the Fed and FHLB and liquid unpledged securities.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding
brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and
financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized
credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the
credit rating of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or
the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact
should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporations banking subsidiaries are federally insured
(subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in the credit
ratings.
Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings
and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table I for a breakdown of
deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and
institutional customers. As indicated in the glossary, for purposes of defining core deposits, the
Corporation excludes brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have
historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost
funds. Core deposits totaled $19.6 billion, or 77% of total deposits, as of March 31, 2010,
compared with $19.5 billion, or 75% of total deposits, as of December 31, 2009. Core deposits
financed 62% of the Corporations earning assets as of March 31, 2010, compared to 60% as of
December 31, 2009.
120
Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over as of March 31, 2010 totaled $4.1
billion, or 16% of total deposits, compared to $4.7 billion, or 18%, as of December 31, 2009. Their
distribution by maturity as of March 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 months or less |
|
$ |
1,736,414 |
|
3 to 6 months |
|
|
819,956 |
|
6 to 12 months |
|
|
639,688 |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
902,809 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,098,867 |
|
|
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB at
competitive prices. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had
short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating $1.9 billion based
on assets pledged with the FHLB at that date. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities
totaled $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Such advances are collateralized
by securities and mortgage loans, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable
features. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on
the terms of FHLB advances outstanding.
As of March 31, 2010, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window
of approximately $3.4 billion, which remained unused as of that date. This compares to a borrowing
capacity at the Fed discount window of $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2009, which was also unused.
This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult
market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance
of loans and securities pledged as collateral.
As of March 31, 2010, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and
projected liquidity to meet its anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and
off-balance sheet commitments, during the foreseeable future and have sufficient liquidity buffers
to address a stress event.
Bank Holding Companies
The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment
securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory
limits), asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries, proceeds
from new borrowings or stock issuance. The principal use of these funds include capitalizing
banking subsidiaries, the repayment of maturing debt, and interest payments to holders of senior
debt and trust preferred securities. The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends to common
and preferred stockholders during 2009 as a result of dividend restrictions imposed by regulators
and in order to conserve capital.
The Corporations bank holding companies (BHCs, Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Inc. and
Popular International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the
corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. However, the cash needs
of the Corporations non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness are now minimal
given that the PFH business was discontinued. These sources of funding have become more difficult
to obtain and costly due to disrupted market conditions and the reductions in the Corporations
credit ratings. The Corporations principal credit ratings are at a level below investment grade
which may affect the Corporations ability to raise funds in the capital markets.
A principal use of liquidity at the BHCs is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized.
Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary have required the BHCs to contribute equity capital
to ensure that it meets the regulatory guidelines for well-capitalized institutions. In the event
that additional capital contributions were necessary, management believes that the BHCs currently
have enough liquidity resources to meet potential capital needs from BPNA in the ordinary course of
business. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the BHCs made capital contributions to BPNA
amounting to $60 million.
Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements, which presents a statement of condition,
of operations and of cash flows for the three BHCs. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial
statements are principally associated
121
with intercompany transactions. The investment securities held-to-maturity at the parent holding
company, amounting to $396 million as of March 31, 2010, consisted principally of $370 million of
subordinated notes from BPPR. Currently, subject to the required approval of the Fed, BPPR may, at
any time, partially redeem these notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, BPPR redeemed $60 million of such securities. The parent
holding company used the funds to capitalized BPNA.
The maturities of the bank holding companies outstanding notes payable as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 are shown in the table below. These borrowings are principally unsecured senior
debt (term notes) and junior subordinated debentures (trust preferred securities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
178,675 |
|
|
|
353,675 |
|
2012 |
|
|
374,251 |
|
|
|
274,183 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Later years |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
(a) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,932,726 |
|
|
$ |
2,008,658 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
(507,335 |
) |
|
|
(512,350) |
(a) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,425,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,496,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts are related to junior subordinated debentures associated with the trust preferred
securities that were issued to the U.S. Treasury in August 2009. |
The reduction in the maturity of unsecured senior debt from the 2011 maturity classification
was the result of two events: (1) the exercise of a put option by holder of $75 million in term
notes during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and (2) the extension of the maturity of $100 million
in term notes from September 2011 to March 2012 based on modifications negotiated with the note
holders during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. These term notes have a fixed interest rate of 13%
as of March 31, 2010. The Corporation no longer has outstanding any term notes in which the holders
have the right to require the Corporation to purchase the notes prior to its contractual maturity.
Included in the table above are $175 million in term notes with interest that adjusts in the event
of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes have an interest rate of 9.75%
over the 3-month LIBOR and mature in September 2011. A future reduction in the Corporations senior
debt rating could increment the cost of these term notes by an additional 75 basis points per
notch.
The repayment of these obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met
with internal liquidity resources, new borrowings and / or proceeds from the issuance of the
depositary shares.
The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, marketable
securities and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs
obligations during the foreseeable future.
The Corporations ratings and outlook as of March 31, 2010 were unchanged from December 31, 2009.
These are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Short-term |
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
debt |
|
debt |
|
Outlook |
|
Fitch
|
|
B
|
|
B
|
|
Negative |
Moodys
|
|
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Negative |
S&P
|
|
C
|
|
B-
|
|
Negative |
|
On May 4, 2010, Standard & Poors Rating Services (S&P) raised Popular, Inc.s counterparty
credit rating to B from B-, with a positive outlook. S&Ps credit rating on BPPR at B+/B was
unchanged, but the outlook was
122
revised to positive from negative. The increase in credit rating by S&P resulted primarily from the
material improvement in the Corporations levels of capital and bank holding company level
liquidity. The acquisition of selected assets and assumption of deposits from Westernbank Puerto
Rico was also seen as modestly beneficial, with limited credit risk.
As indicated previously, the Corporation has $175 million in senior debt issued by the BHCs with
interest that adjusts in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. The Corporations banking
subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these
banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings.
Some of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the banks
well-capitalized status and credit ratings. These agreements could require exposure
collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a
liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $70 million as of March 31, 2010,
with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $82 million to cover the net liability position
with counterparties on these derivative instruments.
In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties
include rating covenants. Based on BPPRs failure to maintain the required credit ratings, the
third parties could have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute fund custodian
and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in the
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section of this MD&A, the Corporation services
residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements
require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institutions
required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure
recourse obligations approximated $169 million as of March 31, 2010. The Corporation could be
required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be
able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post
collateral under certain agreements or the loss of custodian funds could reduce the Corporations
liquidity resources and impact its operating results.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter ended on March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that
the final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very
early stages and management cannot currently predict their
123
outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and May 10, 2010, five putative class actions and two derivative claims were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Court
of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers,
among others. The five class actions have now been consolidated into two separate actions: a
securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action entitled
In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v. Popular, Inc.
et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
includes as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The
consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities between January
24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by
issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action complaint.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purports to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of the ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan
committees, each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleges that
the defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to
eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint seeks to recover
alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive
trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a
scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to
the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the
alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) have been brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment
that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the
Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class
action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García
complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On
November 20, 2009, and pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the
García amended complaint. The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San
Juan, has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13,
2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On
October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Díaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand
proceedings. At a scheduling conference held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in
both the Hoff and García matters pending resolution of their respective motions to dismiss.
124
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that the plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under
Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, the plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed under Part IItem 1ARisk Factors in our 2009 Form 10-K, as supplemented and
updated by the discussion below. These factors could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our
actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in Part IItem
2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this
report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in
our 2009 Form 10-K.
The risks described in our 2009 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Risks Relating to our Business
We engaged in an FDIC-assisted transaction involving Westernbank Puerto Rico (the FDIC-assisted
transaction), which could present additional risks to our business.
On April 30, 2010, Popular, Inc.s banking subsidiary, Banco Popular of Puerto Rico (BPPR),
acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Puerto Rico-based Westernbank Puerto
Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) in an assisted
transaction (herein, the FDIC-assisted transaction). Although this transaction provides for FDIC
assistance to BPPR to mitigate certain risks, such as sharing exposure to loan losses and providing
indemnification against certain liabilities of the former Westernbank, we are still subject to
some of the same risks we would face in acquiring another bank in a negotiated transaction,
including risks associated with maintaining customer relationships and failure to realize the
anticipated acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we expect. In addition,
because the FDIC-assisted transaction was structured in a manner that did not allow bidders the
time and access to information normally associated with preparing for and evaluating a negotiated
transaction, we may face additional risks in the FDIC-assisted transaction.
Our primary regulators conditioned our ability to acquire a failed depository institution on
compliance by us with additional requirements.
In connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction, we made a commitment to the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) that, if BPPR was a successful bidder in an
FDIC-assisted transaction, we would raise additional Tier 1 capital of at least $500 million either
through the sale of certain assets, which could include a sale of our EVERTEC subsidiary, BPPRs
merchant acquiring business and certain other of our financial transaction processing and
technology services operations, or through the issuance of additional Tier 1 capital to investors,
or some combination thereof. If we do not raise the additional capital from the sale of assets, we
would be required to issue additional Tier 1 capital securities, which could include, among other
things, common stock or preferred stock, to meet this commitment. No assurances can be given that
we will be able to raise the additional Tier 1 through either the sale of assets or the issuance of
capital securities. Such further equity issuances could dilute the existing holders of our Common
Stock.
125
If
we were to sell all or a controlling interest in our EVERTEC business
to a third party, we may no longer have access to the financial transaction processing and technology services that EVERTEC
provides or may be obligated to obtain those services at a higher cost.
We are considering a strategic transaction involving our EVERTEC subsidiary, BPPRs merchant
acquiring business and certain other of our financial transaction processing and technology
services operations in Puerto Rico, the United States mainland, and elsewhere in the Caribbean and
Latin America. A strategic transaction involving EVERTEC and these other businesses could involve a
sale to a third party or a strategic investment by a third party with us retaining an ownership
interest. Even though we currently expect to enter into a long-term services contract as part of
any transaction, if we were successful in consummating such a transaction, there can be no
assurances that the third party will continue to provide our other
businesses with the financial
transaction processing and technology services that we currently
receive from EVERTEC. In addition, in order to maximize the proceeds
we would receive in the transaction, we may agree to purchase the
same services we receive from EVERTEC currently at a higher cost than
we currently pay.
Risks Related to the FDIC-assisted Transaction
The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of uncertain factors.
The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of factors, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
our ability to integrate the business and operations of the former Westernbank into
BPPRs current operations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to limit the outflow of deposits held by our new customers in the acquired
branches and successfully to retain and manage interest-earning assets (i.e., loans)
acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract new deposits and to generate new interest-earning assets in the
areas previously served by the former Westernbank branches; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to control the incremental non-interest expense from the former
Westernbank branches and other units in a manner that enables us to maintain a favorable
overall efficiency ratio; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to collect on the loans acquired and satisfy the standard requirements
imposed in the loss sharing agreement; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to earn acceptable levels of interest and non-interest income, including fee
income, from the acquired branches. |
As with any acquisition involving a financial institution, particularly one involving the transfer
of a large number of bank branches such as the FDIC-assisted transaction, there may be business and
service changes and disruptions that result in the loss of customers or cause customers to close
their accounts and move their business to competing financial institutions. Integrating the
business and operations of the former Westernbank will be an operation of substantial size and
expense, and may be affected by general market and economic conditions or government actions
affecting the financial industry generally. Integration efforts will also likely divert our
managements attention and resources. No assurance can be given that we will be able to integrate
the acquired branches successfully, and the integration process could result in the loss of key
employees, the disruption of ongoing business, or inconsistencies in standards, controls,
procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients,
customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the FDIC-assisted
transaction. We may also encounter unexpected difficulties during the
integration or costs, including costs related to the liabilities
assumed, such as legal claims, during the integration or thereafter, that
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, perhaps materially.
Additionally, no assurance can be given that the operation of the former Westernbank branches will
not adversely affect our financial results, that we will be able to achieve results in the future
similar to those achieved by our existing banking business, that we will be able to compete
effectively in the market areas currently served by the former Westernbank, or that we will be able
to manage any growth resulting from the FDIC-assisted transaction effectively.
Deposit and loan run-off rates could exceed the rates we have projected in connection with our
planning for the FDIC-assisted transaction and the integration of the acquired branches.
Deposit run-off could be higher than our assumptions. As part of the FDIC-assisted transaction, it
will be necessary to convert customer loan and deposit data from the former Westernbanks data
processing systems to our data
126
processing system. Delays or errors in the conversion process could
adversely affect customer relationships, increase run-off of deposit and loan customers and result
in unexpected charges and costs. Similarly, run-off could increase if we are not able to service in
a cost-effective manner particular loan or deposit products with special features previously
offered by the former Westernbank. Any increase in run-off rates could adversely affect our ability
to stimulate growth in the acquired branches, our liquidity, and our results of operations.
Changes in national and local economic conditions could lead to higher loan charge-offs in
connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction all of which may not be supported by the loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC.
We acquired significant portfolios of loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction. Although these loan
portfolios will be initially accounted for at fair value, there is no assurance that the loans we
acquired will not become impaired, which may result in additional charge-offs to this portfolio.
The fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to
local residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the level of
charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio, and consequently, reduce our net income, and may
also increase the level of charge-offs on the loan portfolio that we have acquired and
correspondingly reduce our net income. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled
and may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition even if other
favorable events occur.
Although we have entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC which provide that 80% of losses related to specified loan portfolios that we have acquired in
connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction will be borne by the FDIC, we are not protected for
all losses resulting from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios.
Additionally, the loss sharing agreement has limited terms; therefore, any charge-off of related
losses that we experience after the term of the loss sharing agreements will not be reimbursed by
the FDIC and will negatively impact our results of operations. The loss sharing agreements also
impose standard requirements on us which must be satisfied in order to retain loss share
protections. The FDIC has the right to refuse or delay payment for loan losses if the loss sharing
agreements are not managed in accordance with their terms.
The FDIC-assisted transaction increases BPPRs commercial real estate and construction loan
portfolio, which have a greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans.
With the acquisition of most of the former Westernbanks loan portfolio, the commercial real estate
loan and construction loan portfolios become a larger portion of BPPRs total loan portfolio than
it was prior to the FDIC-assisted transaction. This type of lending is generally considered to have
more complex credit risks than traditional single-family residential lending, because the principal
is concentrated in a limited number of loans with repayment dependent on the successful operation
of the related real estate or construction project. Consequently, these loans are more sensitive to
the current adverse conditions in the real estate market and the general economy. These loans are
generally less predictable, more difficult to evaluate and monitor, and collateral may be more
difficult to dispose of in a market decline. However, the negative economic aspects of these risks
are substantially reduced as a result of the FDIC loss sharing agreements.
Our decisions regarding the fair value of assets acquired could be inaccurate and our estimated
loss share receivable in the FDIC-assisted transaction may be inadequate, which could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of acquired loan
portfolios, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans. In the FDIC-assisted transaction,
we may record a loss share receivable that we consider adequate to absorb future losses which may
occur in the acquired loan portfolio. In determining the size of the loss share receivable, we
analyze the loan portfolio based on historical loss experience, volume and classification of loans,
volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, local economic conditions, and other pertinent
information. If our assumptions are incorrect, our current receivable may be insufficient to cover
future loan losses, and increased loss reserves may be needed to respond to different economic
conditions or adverse developments in the acquired loan portfolio. Any increase in future loan
losses could have a negative effect on our operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
127
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the
Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted under this Plan is
10,000,000.
The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly |
|
that May Yet be Purchased |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
Under the Plans or Programs (a) |
|
January 1 - January 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,377,793 |
|
February 1 - February 28
|
|
|
997,536 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
997,536 |
|
|
|
7,380,257 |
|
March 1 - March 31
|
|
|
12,426 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
12,426 |
|
|
|
7,368,036 |
|
|
Total March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,009,962 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
1,009,962 |
|
|
|
7,368,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares forfeited. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
128
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Jorge A. Junquera
|
|
|
|
Jorge A. Junquera |
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo
|
|
|
|
Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller |
|
|
129