e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2006
Commission File Number 1-9608
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
36-3514169 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
10 B Glenlake Parkway, Suite 300
Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(770) 407-3800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the restraint is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer /x/
|
|
Accelerated Filer / /
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer / / |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Number of shares of common stock outstanding (net of treasury shares) as of March 31, 2006:
276.8 million.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(Amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
$1,484.8 |
|
|
|
$1,363.1 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,026.0 |
|
|
|
988.4 |
|
|
|
|
GROSS MARGIN |
|
|
458.8 |
|
|
|
374.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
297.6 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Net nonoperating expenses |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
42.7 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(62.0 |
) |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
$54.8 |
|
|
|
$36.6 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
274.4 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
275.0 |
|
|
|
274.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.21 |
|
|
|
$0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
$0.20 |
|
|
|
$0.13 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.21 |
|
|
|
$0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
$0.20 |
|
|
|
$0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
|
$0.21 |
|
|
|
$0.21 |
|
See Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
2
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$176.1 |
|
|
|
$115.5 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,043.4 |
|
|
|
1,202.7 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
997.6 |
|
|
|
875.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
130.2 |
|
|
|
113.4 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
2,452.4 |
|
|
|
2,472.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
|
|
929.1 |
|
|
|
971.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
2,373.3 |
|
|
|
2,354.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET |
|
|
424.6 |
|
|
|
418.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
190.1 |
|
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
$6,369.5 |
|
|
|
$6,445.8 |
|
|
|
|
See Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
3
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in millions, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
$605.9 |
|
|
|
$647.3 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
643.7 |
|
|
|
719.5 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
411.4 |
|
|
|
162.8 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
1,776.3 |
|
|
|
1,797.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
2,325.9 |
|
|
|
2,429.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
609.2 |
|
|
|
573.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, authorized shares, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800.0 at $1.00 par value |
|
|
290.3 |
|
|
|
290.2 |
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 - 290.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 - 290.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; |
|
|
(411.6 |
) |
|
|
(411.6 |
) |
Shares held: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 - 15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 - 15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
461.1 |
|
|
|
453.0 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,535.0 |
|
|
|
1,538.3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(216.7 |
) |
|
|
(226.7 |
) |
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
1,658.1 |
|
|
|
1,643.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
$6,369.5 |
|
|
|
$6,445.8 |
|
|
|
|
See Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
4
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
$54.8 |
|
|
|
$36.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash restructuring costs |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets/debt extinguishment |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Changes in current accounts excluding the
effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
168.2 |
|
|
|
173.1 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(115.4 |
) |
|
|
(121.7 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(236.2 |
) |
|
|
(130.1 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
Disposals of noncurrent assets and sale of businesses |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
148.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
Cash dividends |
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
Proceeds from exercised stock options and other |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
(87.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate effect on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
(75.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
505.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
|
$176.1 |
|
|
|
$429.8 |
|
|
|
|
See Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
5
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOOTNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Footnote 1 Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
(collectively with its subsidiaries, the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and do not include all the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements include all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position and the results of operations. It is suggested that these
unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the footnotes thereto included in the Companys latest Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Seasonal Variations: The Companys sales and operating income in the first quarter are generally
lower than any other quarter during the year, driven principally by reduced volume and the mix of
products sold in the quarter. The Cleaning & Organization and Other business segments typically
have higher sales in the second half of the year due to retail stocking related to the holiday
season; the Home Fashions business segment typically has higher sales in the second and third
quarters due to an increased level of do-it-yourself projects completed in the summer months; the
Tools & Hardware business segment typically has higher sales in the third and fourth quarters due
to an increased level of home improvement projects completed in the summer and fall months and
purchases of tools as gifts for the holiday season; and the Office Products business segment has
higher sales in the second and third quarters due to the back-to-school season.
Stock Based Compensation: Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), using the modified prospective method and
therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based
compensation expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 includes compensation expense for all
stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based
on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS 123). Stock based compensation expense for all
awards granted after December 31, 2005 is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provision of SFAS 123(R). The Company recognizes stock based compensation
expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally
the option-vesting term of five years. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
recognized stock-based compensation expense by applying the intrinsic value method in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS 123(R) and the
valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company has applied the provisions of
SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R). See Footnote 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for further discussion on stock-based compensation.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation and to reflect discontinued operations. See Footnote 3 for a discussion of
discontinued operations.
Footnote 2 Acquisition of Business
On November 23, 2005, the Company acquired DYMO, a global leader in designing, manufacturing and
marketing on-demand labeling solutions, from Esselte. The Company has preliminarily allocated the
purchase price of $706 million to the identifiable assets. The Company has not yet obtained all
information, including, but not limited to, final independent appraisals required to complete the
purchase price allocation. The final allocation is expected to be completed in the second quarter
of 2006. The initial purchase price allocation was based on preliminary data and managements
estimates at the date of acquisition as follows (in millions):
6
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
$30.2 |
|
Property, plant & equipment, net |
|
|
23.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
623.7 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
109.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
$786.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
$35.9 |
|
Long-term
deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
41.5 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
$80.7 |
|
|
|
|
The transaction summarized above was accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations are
included in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements since the acquisition date. The
acquisition costs were allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The unaudited consolidated results of operations on a pro forma basis, as though the 2005
acquisition of DYMO had been completed on January 1, 2005, are as follows for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
$1,422.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$95.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
$42.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.35 |
|
Net income |
|
|
$0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.35 |
|
Net income |
|
|
$0.15 |
|
These pro forma financial results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include
certain adjustments, such as increased interest expense on acquisition debt. They do not reflect
the effect of synergies that are expected to result from integration.
Footnote 3 Discontinued Operations
The following table summarizes the results of the discontinued operations for the three months
ended March 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$67.6 |
|
|
Loss from operations, net of income tax expense of
$0.2 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
($3.7 |
) |
Loss on disposal, net of income tax benefit of zero
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(49.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
($1.6 |
) |
|
|
($52.8 |
) |
|
|
|
No amounts related to interest expense have been allocated to discontinued operations.
2006
In October 2005, the Company entered into an agreement for the intended sale of its European
Cookware business. The Company completed this divestiture on January 1, 2006. This business
included the brands Pyrex® (used under exclusive license from Corning Incorporated and its
subsidiaries in Europe, the Middle East and Africa only) and
7
Vitri® and was previously included in the Companys Other segment. In the first quarter of 2006,
the Company recorded an additional net loss of $1.6 million upon completion of the sale.
2005
In January 2005, the Company entered into an agreement for the intended sale of the Companys
Curver business. In June 2005, the Company completed the sale of its Curver business. The Curver
business included the Companys European indoor organization and home storage division and was
previously reported in the Cleaning & Organization segment.
In connection with this transaction, the Company recorded a non-cash loss on disposal related to
the sale of $62.0 million, net of tax, in 2005, including $49.1 million, net of tax, in the first
three months of 2005. The first quarter 2005 non-cash loss is reported in the table above as the
loss on disposal of discontinued operations.
Footnote 4 Goodwill Impairment Charges
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company began exploring various options for certain businesses in
the Home Fashions segment. In connection
with this evaluation of alternatives, the Company obtained a better indication of the fair value of
the businesses and determined that these businesses had a net book value in excess of their fair
values. Due to the apparent decline in value, the Company conducted an impairment test in the
first quarter and recorded a $50.9 million impairment loss to write-off the goodwill of the
businesses.
Footnote 5 Restructuring Costs
In the third quarter of 2005, the Company announced a global initiative referred to as Project
Acceleration aimed at strengthening and transforming the Companys portfolio. In connection with
Project Acceleration, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a three-year restructuring
plan (the Plan) that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2005. The Plan is designed to reduce
manufacturing overhead to achieve best cost positions, and to allow the Company to increase
investment in new product development, brand building and marketing. The Plan includes the closure
of approximately one-third of the Companys 80 manufacturing facilities (as of September 2005),
optimizing the Companys geographic footprint. During the first quarter 2006, the Company
announced the closure of 12 facilities. To date, the Company has recorded $81.1 million of charges
related to Project Acceleration.
The Plan is expected to result in cumulative restructuring charges totaling between $350 million
and $400 million ($295 million $340 million after tax), with between $170 million and $200
million ($145 million $170 million after tax) to be incurred in 2006. Approximately 60% of the
charges are expected to be cash charges. Annualized savings are projected to exceed $120 million
upon conclusion of the program in 2008 with expected savings of approximately $50 million in 2007.
The following table shows the restructuring costs recognized for restructuring activities for the
three months ended March 31 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Facility and other exit costs |
|
|
$17.1 |
|
|
|
$3.4 |
|
Employee severance and termination benefits |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Exited contractual commitments and other |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
$29.8 |
|
|
|
$5.9 |
|
|
|
|
The facility and other exit costs are primarily related to the impairment of assets associated with
vacated facilities and future minimum lease payments.
A summary of the Companys restructuring reserves for the three months ended March 31, is as
follows (in millions):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Balance as of January 1, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$26.0 |
|
Restructuring costs (provision) |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Costs incurred |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, |
|
|
$10.6 |
|
|
|
$18.9 |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring provisions were determined based on estimates prepared at the time the restructuring
actions were approved by management and are periodically updated for changes, and also include
amounts recognized as incurred. Cash paid for restructuring activities was $1.3 million and $9.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Footnote 6 Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The components of inventories, net of
LIFO reserves, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
$213.5 |
|
|
|
$180.1 |
|
Work in-process |
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
175.6 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
599.5 |
|
|
|
520.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$997.6 |
|
|
|
$875.9 |
|
|
|
|
Footnote 7 Long-Term Debt
The following is a summary of long-term debt (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Medium-term notes |
|
|
$1,475.0 |
|
|
|
$1,475.0 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
202.0 |
|
Preferred debt securities |
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
Junior convertible subordinated debentures |
|
|
436.7 |
|
|
|
436.7 |
|
Terminated interest rate swaps |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
2,737.3 |
|
|
|
2,592.5 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(411.4 |
) |
|
|
(162.8 |
) |
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
$2,325.9 |
|
|
|
$2,429.7 |
|
|
|
Footnote 8 Employee Benefit and Retirement Plans
The following table presents the components of the Companys pension expense (income) for the three
months ended March 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Service cost-benefits earned
during the period |
|
|
$0.7 |
|
|
|
$0.5 |
|
|
|
$1.8 |
|
|
|
$2.1 |
|
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Curtailment & special termination
benefit gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension expense (income) |
|
|
$0.9 |
|
|
|
($18.1 |
) |
|
|
$3.0 |
|
|
|
$3.7 |
|
|
|
|
9
Effective December 31, 2004, the Company froze its defined benefit pension plan for its entire
non-union U.S. workforce. As a result of this curtailment, the Company reduced its pension
obligation by $50.3 million and recorded a curtailment gain related to negative prior service cost
of $15.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005. The Company replaced the defined
benefit pension plan with an additional defined contribution plan, whereby the Company will make
additional contributions to the Company sponsored employees profit sharing plan. The Company
recorded $5.3 million and $5.1 million in expense for the defined contribution plan for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the first quarter of 2006, the
Company paid $20.9 million to fund the prior year liability associated with the defined
contribution plan.
The following table presents the components of the Companys other postretirement benefits expense
for the three months ended March 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Service cost-benefits earned during the period |
|
|
$0.6 |
|
|
|
$0.9 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
Net other postretirement benefits expense |
|
|
$2.5 |
|
|
|
$4.8 |
|
|
|
|
Footnote 9 Income Taxes
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company completed the reorganization of certain legal
entities in Europe which resulted in the recognition of an income tax benefit of $78.0 million.
Additionally, the effective tax rate was impacted by the non-deductibility associated with the
Companys impairment charge of $50.9 million recorded in the first quarter of 2006.
In January 2005, the Company reached agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to
the appropriate treatment of a specific deduction included in the Companys 2003 U.S. federal
income tax return. The Company requested accelerated review of the transaction under the IRS
Pre-Filing Agreement Program that resulted in an affirmative resolution in late January 2005. As a
result, the Company recorded a $58.6 million benefit in income taxes for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. The amount was fully reserved as of December 31, 2004.
Footnote 10 Earnings per Share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, is
shown below (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
$56.4 |
|
|
|
$89.4 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
$54.8 |
|
|
|
$36.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share
weighted-average shares |
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
274.4 |
|
Dilutive securities (1) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Convertible preferred securities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
275.0 |
|
|
|
274.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.21 |
|
|
|
$0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
$0.20 |
|
|
|
$0.13 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.21 |
|
|
|
$0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
$0.20 |
|
|
|
$0.13 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dilutive securities include in the money options and restricted stock awards. The
weighted-average shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31,
2005 exclude the dilutive effect of approximately 13.4 million and 12.7 million stock options,
respectively, because such options were anti-dilutive. |
|
(2) |
|
The convertible preferred securities are anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings per share. Had the
convertible preferred securities been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation,
net income would be increased by $3.6 million and $3.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and weighted-average shares outstanding would have
increased by 8.3 million shares and 8.5 million shares for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. |
Footnote 11 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is recorded within stockholders equity and encompasses
foreign currency translation adjustments, gains on derivative instruments and minimum pension
liability adjustments.
The following table displays the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
After-tax |
|
After-tax |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Currency |
|
Derivatives |
|
Minimum |
|
Other |
|
|
Translation |
|
Hedging |
|
Pension |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Gain |
|
Gain |
|
Liability |
|
Loss |
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
$12.8 |
|
|
|
$6.8 |
|
|
|
($246.3 |
) |
|
|
($226.7 |
) |
Current year change |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
$21.8 |
|
|
|
$7.8 |
|
|
|
($246.3 |
) |
|
|
($216.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income amounted to the following for the three months ended March 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net income |
|
|
$54.8 |
|
|
|
$36.6 |
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
After-tax derivatives hedging gain |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
$64.8 |
|
|
|
$17.8 |
|
|
|
|
Footnote 12 Stock-Based Compensation
The Company offers stock-based compensation to its employees that include stock options and
restricted share awards as follows:
Stock Options
The Companys stock plans include plans adopted in 1993 and 2003 as well as the Rubbermaid plan
assumed in the merger. The Company issues both non-qualified and incentive stock options at
exercise prices equal to the Companys common stock price on the date of grant with contractual
terms of ten years and generally vest over five years.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards are independent of stock option grants and are generally subject to
forfeiture if employment terminates prior to vesting. The awards generally cliff-vest three years
from the date of grant. Prior to vesting, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred. The
restricted stock has the same dividend and voting rights as the common stock. The Company expenses
the cost of these awards ratably over the vesting period.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under the recognition
and measurement provisions of APB 25. Under APB 25, the Company generally recognized compensation
expense only for restricted stock. The Company recognized the compensation expense associated with
the restricted stock ratably over the associated service period.
11
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
123(R), using the modified prospective transition method, and therefore has not restated the
results of prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the
first quarter of 2006 includes (i) compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (ii) compensation expense for
all share-based payment awards granted after January 1, 2006 based on estimated grant-date fair
values. Compensation expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option
vesting term of five years. The Company estimated future forfeiture rates based on its historical
experience during the preceding fiscal years.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized $6.9 million in stock-based
compensation expense compared to $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
The following table highlights the expense related to share-based payment for the periods ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Stock options |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted shares |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation, net of income tax benefit of
$2.1 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, the Company modified its stock-based compensation by expanding the number of employees
receiving restricted shares. The net impact was to reduce the amount of annual options granted and
increase the annual restricted stock awards. For the year ending December 31, 2006, the Company
expects to recognize approximately $15 million to $20 million, pre-tax, in additional stock-based
compensation expense over 2005 as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and the modification of
its stock-based compensation plan described above.
The following table is a reconciliation of the Companys net income and earnings per share to pro
forma net income and pro forma earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as if
the Company had adopted the provisions of SFAS 123 to options granted under the Companys stock
option plans (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
36.6 |
|
Fair value option expense |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.12 |
|
Diluted income per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.12 |
|
The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following assumptions and weighted-average fair values for the three months ended
March 31, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Weighted-average fair value of grants |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
The Company utilized its historic experience to estimate the expected life of the options and
volatility.
12
The following summarizes the changes in the number of shares of common stock under option,
including options to acquire common stock resulting from the conversion of options under pre-merger
Rubbermaid option plans for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
(in millions) |
Outstanding at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled / expired |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected
to vest at
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the first quarter of 2006 was $7 per
share.
The following table summarizes the changes in the number of shares of restricted stock for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average grant |
|
|
Shares |
|
date fair value |
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at March
31, 2006 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the Companys total unrecognized compensation cost related to
stock-based compensation as of March 31, 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining |
|
|
Unearned |
|
Period of Expense |
|
|
Compensation |
|
Recognition (in months) |
Stock options |
|
$ |
52.0 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Footnote 13 Industry Segments
The Companys reporting segments reflect the Companys focus on building large consumer brands,
promoting organizational integration, achieving operating efficiencies and aligning the businesses
with the Companys strategic account management strategy. The Company reports its results in five
reportable segments as follows:
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Description of Products |
|
Cleaning &
Organization
|
|
Material handling, cleaning, refuse, indoor/outdoor
organization, home storage, food storage |
Office Products
|
|
Ballpoint/roller ball pens, markers, highlighters,
pencils, correction fluids, office products, art
supplies, on-demand labeling products |
Tools & Hardware
|
|
Hand tools, power tool accessories, manual paint
applicators, cabinet, window and convenience
hardware, propane torches, solder |
Home Fashions
|
|
Drapery hardware, window treatments |
Other
|
|
Operating segments that do not meet aggregation
criteria, including aluminum and stainless steel
cookware, hair care accessory products, infant and
juvenile products, including toys, high chairs, car
seats, strollers and play yards |
The Company has updated its segment reporting to reflect the realignment of certain European
businesses, previously reported in the Cleaning & Organization segment, now reported in the Other
segment for all periods presented. The decision to realign these businesses, which include the
European Little Tikes and Graco businesses, is consistent with the Companys move from a regional
management structure to a global business unit structure. The Companys segment results are as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net Sales (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning & Organization |
|
|
$333.1 |
|
|
|
$300.4 |
|
Office Products |
|
|
390.8 |
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
276.8 |
|
|
|
276.4 |
|
Home Fashions |
|
|
196.1 |
|
|
|
198.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
288.0 |
|
|
|
255.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,484.8 |
|
|
|
$1,363.1 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaning & Organization |
|
|
$21.3 |
|
|
|
$12.4 |
|
Office Products |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
Home Fashions |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Other |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(50.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$31.2 |
|
|
|
$71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets |
|
March 31,
2006 |
|
March 31,
2005 |
Cleaning & Organization |
|
|
$712.3 |
|
|
|
$737.4 |
|
Office Products |
|
|
1,119.0 |
|
|
|
1,020.0 |
|
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
734.6 |
|
|
|
735.1 |
|
Home Fashions |
|
|
406.6 |
|
|
|
412.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
426.4 |
|
|
|
446.9 |
|
Corporate (3) |
|
|
2,970.6 |
|
|
|
3,032.0 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6,369.5 |
|
|
|
$6,445.8 |
|
|
|
|
14
Geographic Area Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
$1,064.8 |
|
|
|
$954.7 |
|
Canada |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
1,148.1 |
|
|
|
1,026.9 |
|
Europe |
|
|
248.3 |
|
|
|
257.5 |
|
Central and South America |
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
All other |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,484.8 |
|
|
|
$1,363.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
$70.3 |
|
|
|
$64.0 |
|
Canada |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
Europe |
|
|
(55.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Central and South America |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
All other |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$31.2 |
|
|
|
$71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Sales to Wal*Mart Stores, Inc. and
subsidiaries amounted to approximately 14% of consolidated net sales in the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Sales to no other customer exceeded 10% of consolidated net
sales for either period. |
|
|
2) |
|
Operating income is net sales less cost of products sold, selling, general and
administrative expenses, impairment charges, and restructuring costs. Certain headquarters
expenses of an operational nature are allocated to business segments and geographic areas
primarily on a net sales basis. |
|
|
3) |
|
Corporate assets primarily include goodwill, trade names and deferred tax assets. |
|
|
4) |
|
The restructuring costs have been reflected in the appropriate geographic regions for
all periods presented. |
Footnote 14 Contingencies
The Company is involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. These
proceedings include claims for damages arising out of use of the Companys products, allegations of
infringement of intellectual property, commercial disputes and employment related matters, as well
as environmental matters. Some of the legal proceedings include claims for punitive as well as
compensatory damages, and a few proceedings purport to be class actions.
Although management of the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings
with certainty, it believes that the ultimate resolution of the Companys legal proceedings,
including any amounts it may be required to pay in excess of amounts reserved, will not have a
material effect on the Companys financial statements.
In the normal course of business and as part of its acquisition and divestiture strategy, the
Company may provide certain representations and indemnifications related to legal, environmental,
product liability, tax or other types of issues. Based on the nature of these representations and
indemnifications, it is not possible to predict the maximum potential payments under all of these
agreements due to the conditional nature of the Companys obligations and the unique facts and
circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically,
payments made by the Company under these agreements did not have a material effect on the Companys business, financial
condition or results of operation.
15
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The Company remains committed to investing in strategic brands and new product development,
strengthening its portfolio of businesses, reducing its supply chain costs and streamlining
non-strategic selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A). The Company will continue to
make investments in advertising, promotion, new product development and brand building activities
in its Invest businesses, which encompass the Companys high-potential, high margin brands, while
taking action to improve profitability in Fix businesses, which encompass many of the Companys
low margin product lines.
The Company defines Invest businesses as those having high margin opportunity and the ability to
generate growth through innovative new products and investments in brand building and marketing.
Invest businesses are generally meeting or exceeding the companys minimum financial targets and
collectively generate above average operating income margins. Fix businesses are characterized by
the Company as having various challenges and unacceptable profitability. Managements primary
focus for Fix businesses is to take significant actions to improve profitability. Currently, the
Company classifies Rubbermaid Home Products, Home Fashions and Little Tikes as Fix businesses.
In late February 2006, a revised strategy and key imperatives were communicated to the Companys
management team. The tenets of the strategy include building Brands That Matter, creating scale
advantages through horizontal integration, commercializing innovation across the enterprise and
creating a structure for business globalization.
Consumer-Meaningful Brands: The Company is moving from its historical focus on creating
competitive advantage in manufacturing and distributing products, to excellence in innovating and
marketing brands. Consumer meaningful brands create more value than products alone, and big brands
provide the Company with the economies of scale that can be leveraged in todays marketplace. In
the quarter, the Company made slightly more than $20 million of incremental strategic investments
in advertising, promotion and research and development, particularly on brands like Calphalon®,
Graco®, Goody®, LENOX®, IRWIN®, Sharpie® and DYMO®. The integration of DYMO into the office
products business remains on schedule and the Company is pleased with its performance. The Company
also initiated a consulting and training partnership with one of the largest worldwide creative and
media agencies. The objective is to create best-in-class branding capabilities across the
Company. The first step is to understand the brand vitality of the Companys 16 largest brands
using a common set of metrics. The Company will then integrate this understanding into its ongoing
processes for product innovation, competitive analysis, strategic planning and brand marketing.
Horizontal Integration: The Company is exploring ways to best leverage its common
functional capabilities such as Human Resources, Information Technology, Supply Chain and Finance
to improve efficiency and reduce costs. This broad reaching initiative already includes projects
such as the corporate consolidation of the distribution and transportation function, and
aggregating Company-wide purchasing efforts including both direct and indirect materials and
services. During the quarter, the Company also streamlined the structure of our Tools & Hardware
segment to create a more effective organization and leverage scale efficiencies. The Company also
began the process of creating shared services for the European businesses and is evaluating
expanding the scope of shared services in the United States. The most important benefit of
horizontal integration is that the cost savings from these initiatives will free up money for
investment in innovation and brand building.
Invest in Innovation: The Company has broadened its definition of innovation beyond
product invention. The Company will define innovation as the successful commercialization of
invention. Innovation must be more than product development. It is a rigorous process that
permeates the entire development cycle. It begins with a deep understanding of how consumers
interact with the Companys brands and categories, and all the factors that drive their purchase
decisions and in-use experience. That understanding must then be translated into products that
deliver unique features and benefits, at a best-cost position, providing the consumer with great
value. Lastly, understanding how and where to create awareness and trial, and measuring the
effectiveness of advertising and promotion spending, completes the process. The Company has
pockets of excellence using this expanded definition of innovation, and it will continue to build
on this competency.
16
Globalization: The Company is expanding from a U.S.-centric business model to one that
includes international growth as an increasing focus. The Company is working hard to get the
structure right for the future. For example, the Office Products businesses have been reorganized
to operate across product lines that can target global consumer acceptance. This past quarter, the
Company also aligned the Graco and Little Tikes businesses under a global business unit structure,
reporting under the Home & Family Products group (included in
the Other segment), rather than by geographic location. This
realignment positions the businesses to leverage research and development, branding, marketing and
innovation on a global basis.
2006 will be a transformational year for the Company, on the multi-year journey to becoming an
integrated, innovative branding and marketing company. The Company is making the necessary
investments now for the long-term success of its business.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated items from the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as a percentage of net sales (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net sales |
|
|
$1,484.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
$1,363.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of products sold |
|
|
1,026.0 |
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
988.4 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
458.8 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
374.7 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
297.6 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Nonoperating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Net nonoperating expenses |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Income tax
benefit |
|
|
(62.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
$54.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
$36.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Consolidated Operating Results:
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2006 were $1,484.8 million, representing an increase
of $121.7 million, or 8.9%, from $1,363.1 million in the comparable quarter of 2005. Excluding
sales related to the DYMO acquisition, sales were up $65 million or 4.8%, driven primarily by core
sales increases and favorable pricing, partially offset by a negative foreign currency translation
adjustment of $17 million.
The Companys Invest businesses generated a 4.9% improvement in sales for the first quarter of 2006
versus the comparable quarter of 2005, led by double-digit growth in the Calphalon, Graco, Goody
and Rubbermaid Commercial Products businesses, along with high single-digit growth in the
Rubbermaid Food business and IRWIN and LENOX branded tool businesses. Excluding the sales related
to the DYMO acquisition of $55.9 million, sales in the Office Products segment were up
approximately 1% in the quarter. These increases were partially offset by a double-digit decline
in the consumer electronic tools business as that product line nears the end of its life cycle.
17
Net sales of the businesses the Company classifies as Fix increased by 4.8% due to double-digit
growth in the Levolor and Rubbermaid Home Products businesses, partially offset by lower sales in
our European Window Fashion business.
Gross margin, as a percentage of net sales, in the first quarter of 2006 was 30.9%, or $458.8
million, versus 27.5%, or $374.7 million, in the comparable quarter of 2005. The increase in gross
margin is a result of strong productivity, favorable pricing, and favorable mix, more than
offsetting the impact of raw material inflation.
SG&A expenses in the first quarter of 2006 were 23.4% of net sales, or $346.9 million, versus
21.8%, or $297.6 million, in the comparable quarter of 2005. The primary drivers of the increase
were additional strategic advertising and promotional investments in the Rubbermaid Commercial
Products, Tools & Hardware, Calphalon, Graco and Office Products businesses and the impact of the
DYMO acquisition. Also contributing to the increase were the impact of stock option accounting and
the non-repeating pension curtailment benefit recognized in 2005.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company began exploring various options for certain businesses in
the Home Fashions segment. In connection with this evaluation of alternatives, the Company
obtained a better indication of the fair value of the businesses and determined that these
businesses had a net book value in excess of their fair values. Due to the apparent decline in
value, the Company conducted an impairment test in the first quarter and recorded a $50.9 million
impairment loss to write-off the goodwill of the businesses.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company recorded $29.8 million in restructuring charges related
to Project Acceleration. Project Acceleration remains on track, and the Company announced the
closure of 12 facilities in the first quarter of 2006, in line with expectations. The Company
continues to expect cumulative charges of $350 to $400 million, approximately 60% of which will be
cash charges, over the life of the initiative. Annualized savings are projected to exceed $120
million upon completion of the project with an approximate $50 million benefit expected in 2007 and
the remainder in 2008. In the first quarter of 2005, the Company recorded restructuring costs of
$5.9 million. See Footnote 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for further
information on these restructuring costs.
Operating income in the first quarter of 2006 was $31.2 million, or 2.1% of net sales, versus $71.2
million, or 5.2%, in the comparable quarter of 2005. The change in operating income is the result
of the factors described above.
Net nonoperating expenses in the first quarter of 2006 were 2.5% of net sales, or $36.8 million,
versus 2.1% of net sales, or $28.5 million, in the comparable quarter of 2005. The increase in net
nonoperating expenses is mainly attributable to an increase in net interest expense as a result of
the DYMO acquisition and rising interest rates.
The effective tax rate was (1,107.1)% in the first quarter of 2006 versus (109.4)% in the first
quarter of 2005. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily related to the $78.0 million
income tax benefit recorded in 2006 as a result of the reorganization of certain of the Companys
non-U.S. subsidiaries compared to the net income tax benefit of $58.6 million recorded in 2005 as a
result of favorable resolution of a tax contingency. The tax benefits increased earnings per share
by $0.28 in 2006 and $0.21 in 2005. See Footnote 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for further information.
Income from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2006 was $56.4 million, compared to
$89.4 million in the first quarter of 2005. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
were $0.21 in the first quarter of 2006 compared to $0.33 in the first quarter of 2005.
The loss from discontinued operations was $1.6 million and $52.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The loss on disposal of discontinued operations for the
first quarter of 2006 was $1.6 million, net of tax, compared to $49.1 million, net of tax, in the
first quarter of 2005. The 2006 loss related to the disposal of the Cookware Europe business,
while the 2005 loss related to the disposal of the Curver business. Diluted loss per share from
discontinued operations was $0.01 in the first quarter of 2006 compared to $0.19 in the first
quarter of 2005. See Footnote 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for further
information.
18
Net income for the first quarter of 2006 was $54.8 million, compared to $36.6 million in the first
quarter of 2005. Diluted earnings per share were $0.20 in the first quarter of 2006 compared to
$0.13 in the first quarter of 2005.
Business Group Operating Results:
Net sales by reportable segment were as follows for the three months ended March 31, (in millions,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
Cleaning & Organization |
|
|
$333.1 |
|
|
|
$300.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Office Products |
|
|
390.8 |
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
276.8 |
|
|
|
276.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Home Fashions |
|
|
196.1 |
|
|
|
198.3 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
288.0 |
|
|
|
255.2 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales (1) |
|
|
$1,484.8 |
|
|
|
$1,363.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) by segment was as follows for the three months ended March 31, (in
millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
% Change |
Cleaning & Organization |
|
|
$21.3 |
|
|
|
$12.4 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
% |
Office Products |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Tools & Hardware |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Home Fashions |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
386.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
Corporate Costs (2) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
Impairment Charges |
|
|
(50.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring Costs (3) |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(405.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Operating Income (4) |
|
|
$31.2 |
|
|
|
$71.2 |
|
|
|
(56.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Sales to Wal*Mart Stores, Inc.
and subsidiaries amounted to approximately 14% of consolidated net sales in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales to no other customer
exceeded 10% of consolidated net sales for either period. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Corporate operating expenses
consist primarily of administrative costs, including stock-based
compensation, that are not
allocated to a particular segment. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Restructuring costs have been presented separately in this table. For
additional information refer to Footnote 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited). |
|
|
(4) |
|
Operating income is net sales less cost of products sold, selling, general and
administrative expenses, impairment charges and restructuring costs. Certain
headquarters expenses of an operational nature are allocated to business segments
primarily on a net sales basis. |
Cleaning & Organization
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were $333.1 million, an increase of $32.7 million, or
10.9%, from $300.4 million in the first quarter of 2005, driven by double-digit growth in the
Rubbermaid Commercial Products and Rubbermaid Home businesses and high single-digit growth in the
Rubbermaid Food business. The first quarter sales growth in the Rubbermaid Food and Rubbermaid
Home businesses benefited from relatively easy comparisons as sales in the first quarter of 2005
were suppressed by product line exits and pricing actions required to offset raw material
inflation.
Operating income for the first quarter of 2006 was $21.3 million or 6.4% of sales, an increase of
$8.9 million, or 71.8%, from $12.4 million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in operating
income is a result of the sales increase and favorable mix, partially offset by raw material
inflation and increased SG&A in the Rubbermaid Commercial Products business.
19
Office Products
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were $390.8 million, an increase of $58.0 million, or
17.4%, from $332.8 million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase was primarily due to the
DYMO acquisition with sales of $55.9 million, partially offset by unfavorable currency translation.
Excluding the impact of DYMO, sales were up about 1%. From a product perspective, double-digit
growth in markers and mid single-digit growth in everyday writing were partially offset by declines
in fine writing and coloring.
Operating income for the first quarter of 2006 was $32.3 million or 8.3% of sales, a decrease of
$1.2 million, or 3.6%, from $33.5 million in the first quarter of 2005. The decrease in operating
income was the result of increased SG&A investment, restructuring related expenses and acquisition
integration costs, offset by additional income from the DYMO acquisition.
Tools & Hardware
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were $276.8 million, essentially flat to last year, from
$276.4 million in the first quarter of 2005, driven by high single-digit growth in the IRWIN and
LENOX branded tools offset by a double-digit decline in the consumer electronic tools business.
Operating income for the first quarter of 2006 was $33.1 million or 12.0% of sales, an increase of
$6.4 million, or 24.0%, from $26.7 million in the first quarter of 2005. Operating income
increased primarily as the result of productivity initiatives and favorable mix, partially offset
by increased SG&A investment.
Home Fashions
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were $196.1 million, a decrease of $2.2 million, or 1.1%,
from $198.3 million in the first quarter of 2005. The decrease was driven by a double-digit
decline in European sales, offset by double-digit growth in North America. Sales in North America
benefited from the addition of a new warehouse at a key retailer and generally low customer
inventories coming into the year.
Operating income (loss) for the first quarter of 2006 was $12.9 million or 6.6% of sales, an
increase of $17.4 million, or 386.7%, from ($4.5) million in the first quarter of 2005. The
increase in operating income was the result of sales growth in North America, strong productivity
and a reduction in European SG&A expenses.
Other
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were $288.0 million, an increase of $32.8 million, or
12.9%, from $255.2 million in the first quarter of 2005, driven by double-digit increases in the
Graco, Calphalon and Goody businesses. A portion of the sales increase relates to the timing of
promotions and plan-o-gram changes at retailers.
Operating
income for the first quarter of 2006 was $29.9 million or 10.4% of sales, an increase of
$11.4 million, or 61.6%, from $18.5 million in the first quarter of 2005. The primary drivers of
the increase in operating income were the impact of the sales increase, productivity and favorable
mix, partially offset by increased SG&A investment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $60.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The change in cash and cash equivalents is as follows for the three months ended March 31, (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
$(11.7 |
) |
|
|
$55.5 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
(87.2 |
) |
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$60.6 |
|
|
|
$(75.8 |
) |
|
|
|
20
Sources:
The Companys primary sources of liquidity and capital resources include cash provided by operating
activities, proceeds from divestitures and use of available borrowing facilities.
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was
$(11.7) million compared to $55.5 million for the comparable period of 2005. The decrease in cash
provided from operating activities was primarily due to the $20.9 million contribution to the U.S.
defined contribution plan and the timing of the payment of certain accrued liabilities.
The Company has a $750.0 million syndicated revolving credit facility (the Revolver) pursuant to
a five-year credit agreement, which expires in November 2010. At March 31, 2006, there were no
borrowings under the Revolver.
In lieu of borrowings under the Revolver, the Company may issue up to $750.0 million of commercial
paper. The Revolver provides the committed backup liquidity required to issue commercial paper.
Accordingly, commercial paper may only be issued up to the amount available for borrowing under the
Revolver. The Revolver also provides for the issuance of up to $100.0 million of standby letters
of credit so long as there is a sufficient amount available for borrowing under the Revolver. At
March 31, 2006, $350.0 million of commercial paper was outstanding and there were no standby
letters of credit issued under the Revolver.
The Revolver permits the Company to borrow funds on a variety of interest rate terms and requires,
among other things, that the Company maintain certain Interest Coverage and Total Indebtedness to
Total Capital Ratio, as defined in the agreement. The Revolver also limits Subsidiary
Indebtedness. As of March 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with the agreement governing the
Revolver. On an annual basis, the Company may request extension of the Revolver (subject to lender
approval) for additional one-year periods.
In the first three months of 2006, the Company received proceeds from the issuance of debt of
$148.3 million compared to $1.9 million in the first three months of 2005.
In the first three months of 2006, the Company received cash proceeds of $29.8 million related to
the sale of businesses and other non-current assets, compared to $12.9 million in the first three
months of 2005. The European Cookware business was sold in 2006, generating cash proceeds of $29.5
million.
Uses:
The Companys primary uses of liquidity and capital resources include acquisitions, dividend
payments, capital expenditures and payments on debt.
In the first three months of 2006, the Company spent $23.2 million on strategic acquisitions,
compared to $30.3 million in the comparable period of 2005.
In the first three months of 2006, the Company made payments on notes payable and long-term debt of
$1.9 million compared to $31.1 million in the first three months of 2005, including the purchase in
2005 of 550,000 shares of its Preferred Securities from a holder for $47.375 per share. The
Company paid $26.1 million for such purchase of Preferred Securities.
Cash used for restructuring activities was $1.3 million and $9.2 million in the first three months
of 2006 and 2005, respectively. These payments relate primarily to employee termination benefits.
The Company expects to spend approximately $100 million in 2006 related to restructuring
activities. See Footnote 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for additional
information.
Capital expenditures were $25.3 million and $23.1 million in the first three months of 2006 and
2005, respectively. Capital expenditures for 2006 are expected to be in the range of $125 to $150
million.
21
In the first three months of 2006, the Company paid $20.9 million to fund the U.S. defined
contribution plan implemented in 2005. See Footnote 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for additional information.
Dividends paid were $58.2 million and $58.0 million in the first three months of 2006 and 2005,
respectively. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company expects to make similar dividend
payments.
Stockholders equity increased in the first three months of 2006 by $14.9 million. The increase in
stockholders equity is primarily due to the current year net income and foreign currency
translation adjustments, partially offset by dividends paid on common stock.
Working capital at March 31, 2006 was $676.2 million compared to $675.3 million at December 31,
2005. The current ratio was 1.38:1 at March 31, 2006 and 1.38:1 at December 31, 2005.
Total debt to total capitalization (total debt is net of cash and cash equivalents, and total
capitalization includes total debt and stockholders equity) was .61:1 at March 31, 2006 and .60:1
at December 31, 2005.
The Company believes that cash provided from operations and available borrowing facilities will
continue to provide adequate support for the cash needs of existing businesses on a short-term
basis; however, certain events, such as significant acquisitions, could require additional external
financing on a long-term basis.
Critical Accounting Policies
The
Companys accounting policies are more fully described in the consolidated financial statements
included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying footnotes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute
certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual
results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the
consolidated financial statements. The Company describes its most critical accounting policies in
its 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. The following discussion provides additional information about the effects on
the consolidated financial statements of judgments and estimates related to the Companys policies
related to the recording of stock-based compensation expense.
Stock Options
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R), using the modified
prospective method and therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under this transition
method, stock-based compensation expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 includes compensation
expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January
1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of
SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation
(SFAS 123). Stock-based compensation
expense for all awards granted after December 31, 2005 is based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provision of SFAS 123(R). The Company recognizes stock based
compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which
is generally the option-vesting term of five years. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the
Company recognized stock-based compensation expense by applying the
intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). In March 2005, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107)
regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS 123(R) and the valuation of share-based payments for
public companies. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS
123(R).
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of share-based payment
awards require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the
share-based payment awards and stock price volatility. The assumptions used in calculating the fair
value of share-based payment awards represent
22
managements best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application
of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our
stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, we are
required to estimate the expected pre-vesting forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those
shares expected to vest. If our actual pre-vesting forfeiture rate is materially different from our
estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from our estimates.
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for a further discussion of
stock-based compensation.
Market Risk
The Companys market risk is impacted by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates
and certain commodity prices. Pursuant to the Companys policies, natural hedging techniques and
derivative financial instruments may be utilized to reduce the impact of adverse changes in market
prices. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.
The Company manages interest rate exposure through its conservative debt ratio target and its mix
of fixed and floating rate debt. Interest rate swaps may be used to adjust interest rate exposures
when appropriate based on market conditions, and, for qualifying hedges, the interest differential
of swaps is included in interest expense.
The Companys foreign exchange risk management policy emphasizes hedging anticipated intercompany
and third party commercial transaction exposures of one-year duration or less. The Company focuses
on natural hedging techniques of the following form: 1) offsetting or netting of like foreign
currency flows, 2) structuring foreign subsidiary balance sheets with appropriate levels of debt to
reduce subsidiary net investments and subsidiary cash flows subject to conversion risk, 3)
converting excess foreign currency deposits into U.S. dollars or the relevant functional currency
and 4) avoidance of risk by denominating contracts in the appropriate functional currency. In
addition, the Company utilizes forward contracts and purchased options to hedge commercial and
intercompany transactions. Gains and losses related to qualifying hedges of commercial and
intercompany transactions are deferred and included in the basis of the underlying transactions.
Derivatives used to hedge intercompany loans are marked to market with the corresponding gains or
losses included in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company purchases certain raw materials, including resin, corrugate, steel and aluminum, which
are subject to price volatility caused by unpredictable factors. While future movements of raw
material costs are uncertain, a variety of programs, including periodic raw material purchases,
purchases of raw materials for future delivery and customer price adjustments help the Company
address this risk. Where practical, the Company uses derivatives as part of its risk management
process. In the first three months of 2006, the Company experienced raw material inflation
(primarily in resin), which was more than offset by pricing increases, favorable mix and
productivity.
The amounts shown below represent the estimated potential economic loss that the Company could
incur from adverse changes in either interest rates or foreign exchange rates using the
value-at-risk estimation model. The value-at-risk model uses historical foreign exchange rates and
interest rates to estimate the volatility and correlation of these rates in future periods. It
estimates a loss in fair market value using statistical modeling techniques that are based on a
variance/covariance approach and includes substantially all market risk exposures (specifically
excluding equity-method investments). The fair value losses shown in the table below have no
impact on results of operations or financial condition, but are shown as an illustration of the
impact of potential adverse changes in interest rates. The following table indicates the
calculated amounts for the three months ended March 31, (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
March 31, |
|
Month |
|
March 31, |
|
Confidence |
|
|
Average |
|
2006 |
|
Average |
|
2005 |
|
Level |
Interest rates |
|
|
$8.1 |
|
|
|
$8.1 |
|
|
|
$9.9 |
|
|
|
$9.9 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
$5.2 |
|
|
|
$5.2 |
|
|
|
$1.5 |
|
|
|
$1.5 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
23
The 95% confidence interval signifies the Companys degree of confidence that actual losses would
not exceed the estimated losses shown above. The amounts shown here disregard the possibility that
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates could move in the Companys favor. The
value-at-risk model assumes that all movements in these rates will be adverse. Actual experience
has shown that gains and losses tend to offset each other over time, and it is highly unlikely that
the Company could experience losses such as these over an extended period of time. These amounts
should not be considered projections of future losses, because actual results may differ
significantly depending upon activity in the global financial markets.
Forward Looking Statements
Forward-looking statements in this Report are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may relate
to, but are not limited to, information or assumptions about the effects of Project Acceleration,
sales (including pricing), income/(loss), earnings per share, operating income or gross margin
improvements, return on equity, return on invested capital, capital expenditures, working capital,
cash flow, dividends, capital structure, debt to capitalization ratios, interest rates, internal
growth rates, restructuring, impairment and other charges, potential losses on divestitures, impact
of changes in accounting standards, pending legal proceedings and claims (including environmental
matters), future economic performance, operating income improvements, costs and cost savings
(including raw material inflation, productivity and streamlining), synergies, managements plans,
goals and objectives for future operations, performance and growth or the assumptions relating to
any of the forward-looking statements. These statements generally are accompanied by words such as
intend, anticipate, believe, estimate, project, target, plan, expect, will,
should or similar statements. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees because there are inherent difficulties in predicting future results. Actual results
could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those matters set forth
in this Report generally and Exhibit 99.1 to this Report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled
Market Risk in the Companys Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and
Financial Condition (Part I, Item 2).
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2006, an evaluation was performed by the Companys management, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information required under this Item is contained above in Part I. Financial Information, Item 1
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 5. Other Information
On April 26, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to Section 2.7 of
the Companys By-Laws, which sets forth the quorum and voting requirements applicable to meetings
of the Companys stockholders. This section, as amended, continues to provide that, in general,
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of shares of
capital stock represented at the meeting shall be the act of the stockholders, unless a different
number of votes is required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Certificate of
Incorporation or the By-Laws. The amendment adds language to clarify that, consistent with the
Companys historical practice and interpretation of the Companys By-Laws, directors are elected by
a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting and
entitled to vote on the election of directors. The full text of this amendment to the Companys
By-Laws is set forth in Exhibit 3.2 to this report and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
By-Laws of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., as amended as of April 26, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amendment to By-Laws of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., effective April
26, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
By-Laws of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., as amended as of April 26,
2006, are included in Item 3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Amended 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan under the Newell Rubbermaid
Inc. 2003 Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Management Cash Bonus Plan, as amended
February 8, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Compensation Arrangement for Mark D. Ketchum dated February 13,
2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Employment Security Agreement between the Company and Mark
D. Ketchum, dated March 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 10, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Performance share award grant to Mark D. Ketchum on March 22,
2006, under the 2003 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Section titled Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 22, 2006 ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Chief Executive Officer under
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. 2003 Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statement of Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Safe Harbor Statement. |
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.
Registrant
|
|
Date: May 2, 2006 |
/s/ Ronald L. Hardnock
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hardnock |
|
|
Vice President -- Corporate Controller |
|
|