Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
(Rule
14a-101)
INFORMATION
REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 2)
Filed by
the Registrant þ
Filed by
a party other than the Registrant o
Check the
appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy
Statement
o Confidential, for Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy
Statement
o Definitive Additional
Materials
o Soliciting Material
under ss. 240.14a-12
Mitek Systems,
Inc.
(Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Not
Applicable
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee
required.
o Fee computed
on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined)
|
|
4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
|
o Fee paid
previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if
any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
1)
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement
No.:
|
MITEK
SYSTEMS, INC.
8911
BALBOA AVE., SUITE B
SAN
DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD FEBRUARY 23, 2011
TO
ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF MITEK SYSTEMS, INC.
The
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Mitek Systems, Inc., will be held at
9:00 a.m., local time, Wednesday, February 23, 2011, at Mitek's
executive offices located at 8911 Balboa Ave., Suite B, San Diego,
California 92123, for the following purposes:
1.
|
To
elect a board of seven directors to hold the office during the ensuing
year or until their respective successors are elected and
qualified;
|
2.
|
To
adopt the Mitek Systems, Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit
Plan;
|
3.
|
To
ratify the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. as our independent
registered public accounting firm for our 2011 fiscal
year;
|
4.
|
To
hold an advisory vote on the overall compensation of our named executive
officers;
|
5.
|
To
hold an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive
compensation; and
|
6.
|
To
transact such business as may properly come before the meeting and any
adjournments thereof.
|
Our Board
of Directors has fixed the close of business on January 10, 2011 as the
record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote
at the Annual Meeting and all adjournments thereof. A list of these
stockholders will be open to examination by any stockholder at the meeting and
for ten days prior thereto during normal business hours at our executive
offices, 8911 Balboa Ave., Suite B, San Diego, California
92123.
Enclosed
for your convenience is a form of proxy which may be used at the Annual Meeting
and which, unless otherwise marked, authorizes the holders of the proxy (i) to
vote for the proposed slate of directors, (ii) to adopt the Mitek Systems, Inc.
Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, (iii) to ratify the appointment of Mayer
Hoffman McCann, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for
our 2011 fiscal year, (iv) to approve, on an advisory basis, the overall
compensation of our named executive officers, (v) to approve the option of once
every three years as to the frequency of the advisory vote on the overall
compensation of our named executive officers and (vi) as the proxy holder deems
appropriate on any other matter brought before the Annual Meeting.
You
are invited to attend the meeting in person. Even if you expect to
attend, it is important that you sign, date and return the enclosed proxy
promptly in the business reply envelope which requires no postage if mailed in
the United States. It is important that your shares be represented at
the meeting to assure the presence of a quorum. If you sign and send
in a proxy, you may revoke it before it is exercised (1) by executing a new
proxy bearing a later date, (2) by filing with our Corporate Secretary an
instrument revoking your proxy, or (3) by attending the meeting and voting in
person.
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders'
Meeting
This proxy statement, along with our
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy card, are available online at
www.proxyvote.com.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
San
Diego, California
|
John
M. Thornton
|
January
20, 2011
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
MITEK
SYSTEMS, INC.
8911
BALBOA AVE., SUITE B
SAN
DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
PROXY
STATEMENT
ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
February 23,
2011
This
proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
the Board of Directors of Mitek Systems, Inc. ("we," "us," "our," "Mitek," or
the "Company") for use at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual
Meeting") to be held at 9:00 a.m., local time, Wednesday, February 23,
2011, at our executive offices at 8911 Balboa Ave., Suite B, San Diego, CA
92123, and at any adjournments thereof.
We will
pay the expenses of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting including the cost
of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials. Proxies may
be solicited personally, by mail, by telephone, by facsimile, or by telegram, by
our regularly employed officers and employees. Our officers and
employees will not receive additional compensation for soliciting
proxies. We may request persons holding stock in their names for
others, such as brokers and nominees, to forward proxy materials to their
principals and request authority to execute the proxy. We will
reimburse any such brokers and nominees for their expenses in connection
therewith.
Our
2010 Annual Report to Stockholders is included in this Proxy Statement, but is
not incorporated in, and is not part of, this Proxy Statement and is not
proxy-soliciting material. We intend to mail this Proxy Statement and
the accompanying material to stockholders of record on or about January 20,
2011.
VOTING
The
holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock on
the record date must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in
order to obtain a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are counted in determining whether a quorum is obtained at the
Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A broker
non-vote occurs when a nominee (typically a broker or bank) holding shares for a
beneficial owner (typically referred to as shares being held in “street name”)
submits a proxy for the Annual Meeting, but does not vote on a particular
proposal because the nominee has not received voting instructions from the
beneficial owner and does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares
with respect to that proposal. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be
counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of establishing a
quorum, but will not be counted as having voting power to vote on the proposal
in question. Brokers generally have discretionary authority to vote on routine
matters. The ratification of the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. as
our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine
matter. The election of directors, including uncontested elections, is
considered a non-routine matter and brokers do not have discretionary authority
to vote on the election of directors. In addition, rules recently proposed by
the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding “say on pay” and “say when on pay”
proposals are considered non-routine matters and brokers do not have
discretionary authority to vote on such matters.
As of the
close of business on January 10, 2011, the record date for determining
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, we had a
total of 20,499,395 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. Each stockholder of record on the record date is
entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to come before the
Annual Meeting.
To ensure
that your vote is recorded promptly, please vote as soon as possible, even if
you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Most stockholders
have three options for submitting their votes: (i) via the Internet at the
website address set forth on the accompanying ballot, (ii) by telephone at the
phone number set forth on the accompanying ballot or (iii) by
mail. If you have Internet access, we encourage you to record your vote
on the Internet. It is convenient, and it saves us significant
postage and processing costs. In addition, when you vote via the
Internet or by phone prior to the Annual Meeting date, your vote is recorded
immediately and there is no risk that postal delays will cause your vote to
arrive late and therefore not be counted. If you attend the Annual
Meeting and are a registered holder, you may also submit your vote in person,
and any previous votes that you submitted, whether by Internet, telephone or
mail, will be superseded by the vote that you cast at the Annual
Meeting. The Annual Meeting’s polls will close shortly after 9:00
a.m., local time, and no further votes will be accepted after that
time. If you have any questions about submitting your vote, please
call our Corporate Secretary, at (858) 503-7810.
Most
beneficial owners whose stock is held in street name will receive instructions
for voting their shares from their broker, bank or other nominee, rather than
our proxy card. A number of brokers and banks participate in a
program provided through Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. that allows
stockholders to grant their proxy to vote shares by means of the telephone or
Internet. If your shares are held in an account with a broker or bank
participating in the Broadridge program, then you may be able to vote your
shares telephonically by calling the telephone number shown on the instruction
form received from your broker or bank, or over the Internet at Broadridge’s web
site at http://www.proxyvote.com. If you hold your stock in street
name and wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, then you must obtain a
legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee that
holds your shares of record.
You may
revoke your proxy at any time prior to the close of the polls at the Annual
Meeting by: (i) submitting a later-dated proxy, in person at the Annual Meeting,
via the Internet, by telephone or by mail, (ii) voting in person at the Annual
Meeting or (iii) delivering instructions to our Corporate Secretary, prior to
the Annual Meeting by mail to Mitek Systems, Inc. at 8911 Balboa Avenue, Suite
B, San Diego, CA 92123. If you hold shares through a bank or
brokerage firm, you must contact that firm to revoke any prior voting
instructions. Unless revoked, the proxy will be voted as
specified.
With
respect to Proposal 1, our directors are elected by a plurality
vote. Abstentions, broker non-votes and votes withheld will have no
effect on the outcome of the vote.
With
respect to Proposal 2, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
shares of common stock having voting power, is required to approve the Mitek
Systems, Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, as amended and
restated. Abstentions will have the same effect as an "against"
vote. Broker non-votes do not having voting power on this proposal
and will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
With
respect to Proposal 3, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
shares of common stock having voting power present in person or represented by
proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for the ratification of the appointment
of Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting
firm for our 2011 fiscal year. Abstentions will have the same effect
as an "against" vote.
With
respect to Proposal 4, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
shares of our common stock having voting power present in person or represented
by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the
overall compensation of our named executive officers. Abstentions will have the
same effect as an "against" vote. Broker non-votes do not having voting power on
this proposal and will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the
vote.
With
respect to Proposal 5, the frequency of the advisory vote on the overall
compensation of our named executive officers, the alternative — every year,
every two years or every three years — receiving the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock having voting power will be
the frequency that stockholders approve. If none of the alternatives receive
such majority vote, we will consider the alternate receiving the highest number
of votes cast by stockholders to be the frequency that the stockholders approve.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the
vote.
The
shares represented by proxies that are returned properly signed will be voted in
accordance with the stockholder's directions. If the proxy card is
signed and returned without direction as to how the shares are to be voted, the
shares will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors. The
persons named as proxies were selected by our Board of Directors.
PROPOSAL
NO. 1
TO
ELECT SEVEN DIRECTORS
Generally
Pursuant
to our Bylaws, our Board of Directors has fixed the number of authorized
directors at seven. All seven directors are to be elected at the
Annual Meeting, to hold office until the next annual meeting or until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. The seven nominees
receiving the highest number of votes will be elected.
Unless
authorization to do so is withheld, it is intended that the persons named in the
enclosed proxy will vote for the election of the nominees proposed by our Board
of Directors. With the exception of Mr. Alex W. "Pete" Hart, all
of the nominees have served as directors of the Company since the 2010 annual
meeting of stockholders. Mr. Hart was recommended to the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as a nominee by our Chief
Executive Officer. All incumbent directors, except Mr. Michael
Bealmear, are nominees for re-election to the Board. Mr.
Bealmear has not been nominated for re-election. If any of the
nominees should become unavailable for election before the Annual Meeting, the
proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee or nominees, if any, designated by
our Board of Directors.
The
following table includes the names and certain information about the nominees
for director. All of the nominees named below have consented to being
named herein and to serve, if elected.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position With Mitek
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
M. Thornton
|
|
78
|
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
B. DeBello
|
|
52
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinton
P. Cunningham (2)
|
|
74
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald
I. Farmer, Ph. D. (1) (2) (3)
|
|
76
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex
W. "Pete" Hart
|
|
70
|
|
Director
Nominee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally
B. Thornton
|
|
76
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
P. Tudor (1)
|
|
65
|
|
Director
|
(1)
|
Member
of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors
|
(2)
|
Member
of the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors
|
(3)
|
Member
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors
|
John M. Thornton - Mr.
Thornton has been a director of Mitek since March 1986. He was
appointed Chairman of the Board as of October 1, 1987 and served as President
from May 1991 to July 1991, as Chief Executive Officer from May 1991 to February
1992 and again as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer from
September 1998 to May 2003, when he resigned from his positions as President and
Chief Executive Officer. He resigned from his position as Chief
Financial Officer in May 2005. He continues to serve as Chairman of
the Board. From 1976 through 1988, Mr. Thornton served as Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Board at Micom Systems, Inc. Mr. Thornton is
also Chairman of the Board of Thornton Winery Corporation in Temecula,
California.
The Board
believes Mr. Thornton's extensive executive management and Chairman experience
with public and privately held companies provides him with the necessary skills
to be Chairman of our Board of Directors. Having previously served as our
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, he has developed
in-depth knowledge of our company and the industry in which we sell our
products.
James B. DeBello - Mr. DeBello
has been a director of Mitek since November 1994. He has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of Mitek since May 2003. In
January 2009, Mr. DeBello was appointed Mitek’s Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary, in addition to his other positions. Prior to joining
Mitek, he was Chief Executive Officer of AsiaCorp Communications, Inc., a
wireless data infrastructure and software company, from July 2001 to May
2003. He was Venture Chief Executive Officer for IdeaEdge Ventures,
Inc., a venture capital company, from June 2000 to June 2001. From
May 1999 to May 2000 he was President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of
the Board of Directors of CollegeClub.com, an Internet company. From
November 1998 to April 1999 he was Chief Operating Officer of WirelessKnowledge,
Inc., a joint venture company formed between Microsoft and Qualcomm,
Inc. Before that, from November 1996 to November 1998, Mr. DeBello
held positions as Vice President, Assistant General Manager and General Manager
of Qualcomm, Inc.'s Eudora Internet Software Division, and Vice President of
Product Management of Qualcomm, Inc.'s Subscriber Equipment
Division. Mr. DeBello holds a B.A., magna cum laude and MBA from
Harvard Business School and was a Rotary Scholar at the University of Singapore
where he studied economics and Chinese.
The Board
believes Mr. DeBello's background in executive leadership roles for a number of
global technology companies makes him well qualified to serve on our Board and
as our current President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer.
Vinton P. Cunningham - Mr.
Cunningham has been a director of Mitek since May 2005. Retired since
2002, he served as Sr. Vice-President-Finance of EdVision Corporation from 1993
to 2002. Mr. Cunningham was Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Founders Club Golf Company from 1990 to 1993. He
was Vice President-Finance of Amcor Capital, Inc. from 1985 to
1990. Mr. Cunningham was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Superior Farming Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Superior Oil Company,
from 1981 to 1985.
The Board
believes Mr. Cunningham's background has provided our Board of Directors with
valuable financial and accounting expertise as our financial expert on the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors. Having served as a member of our
Board of Directors since 2005, Mr. Cunningham has a good understanding of our
business, operations, and culture.
Gerald I. Farmer - Dr. Farmer
has been a director of Mitek since May 1994. He was Executive Vice
President of Mitek from November 1992 until June 1997. Before joining
Mitek, from January 1987 to November 1992, Dr. Farmer was Executive Vice
President of HNC Software, Inc. He has held senior management
positions with IBM Corporation, Xerox, SAIC and Gould Imaging and
Graphics.
The Board
believes Dr. Famer's extensive career as a leader of a number of
technology-based companies makes him well qualified to serve on our Board of
Directors. Having served our company as both an executive officer and
a director since 1992, Dr. Farmer is intimately familiar with both our
technology and the industry.
Alex W. "Pete" Hart - Mr. Hart
is Chairman of the SVB Financial Group and has worked as an independent
consultant to the financial services industry since 1997. He served
as Chief Executive Officer of Advanta Corporation, a public diversified
financial services company from 1995 to 1997, where he had previously served as
Executive Vice Chairman from 1994 to 1995. Prior to joining Advanta,
he was President and Chief Executive Officer of MasterCard International, a
worldwide payment service provider from 1994 to 1998. In addition to
the SVB Financial Group, Mr. Hart is currently a member of the Boards of
Directors of the following public companies: Fair Isaac Corporation, a
predictive software company, Global Payments, Inc., a payment services company,
and VeriFone Holdings, Inc., an electronics company. Mr. Hart has
previously served as a member of the Boards of Directors of numerous other
companies, including HNC Software, Retek Inc., Shopping.com, Sanchez Computer
Associates, US Encode, eHarmony.com and Sequal Technologies, Inc. In
addition, he is an advisor to a number of private companies, including Tempo
Payments, NoLie MRI, Cimbal Technologies and US Encode. Mr. Hart
holds a bachelor’s degree in Social Relations from Harvard
University.
The Board
believes Mr. Hart's extensive experience as a financial services and payments
industry leader and director qualifies him to serve on our Board of
Directors.
Sally B. Thornton - Ms.
Thornton has been a director of Mitek since April 1988. She has been
a private investor for more than 40 years. She served as a director
of Micom Systems, Inc. from 1976 to 1988. From 1987 until 1996 she
served as Chairman of Medical Materials, Inc, a composite plastics
manufacturer. Ms. Thornton is on the Board of Directors of Thornton
Winery Corporation in Temecula, California. She has been a Trustee of
the Sjorgren's Syndrome Foundation in New York and Stephens College in
Missouri. Ms. Thornton is also a Life Trustee of the San Diego Museum
of Art. Ms. Thornton is the spouse of John M. Thornton, Chairman of
the Board.
The Board
believes Ms. Thornton's far-reaching experience as a leader of both for-profit
and non-profit organizations serves her well as member of our Board of
Directors. Having served on our Board for more than twenty years, Ms.
Thornton is familiar with both our company and our technology.
William P. Tudor - Mr. Tudor
has been a director of Mitek since September 2004. He is President of
International Learning Corporation. Prior to that, he was Executive
Vice President of Scantron Corporation from July 2002 to July
2005. He was Chief Executive Officer of EdVision from June 1990 to
July 2002.
The Board
believes Mr. Tudor's background as a technology entrepreneur and software
executive at both public and private companies gives him the experience
necessary to serve on our Board of Directors.
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE
NOMINEES DISCUSSED ABOVE TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
PROPOSAL
NO. 2
ADOPTION
OF THE MITEK SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT PLAN
Summary
We
currently maintain the Mitek Systems, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan, among other
stock option plans, under which we may award stock options (but no other types
of equity-based incentive awards) to employees, directors and other key service
providers. To provide the Board of Directors with more flexibility
and for the other reasons discussed below, on January 12, 2011, subject to
stockholder approval, the Board of Directors adopted the Mitek Systems, Inc.
Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, as amended and restated (the "Director
Plan"), and authorized up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance
thereunder. We are submitting the Director Plan to our stockholders for their
approval at the annual meeting. If stockholder approval is not obtained, we may
not make awards under the Director Plan.
We
believe that incentives and stock-based awards focus directors on the objective
of creating stockholder value and promoting the success of the our company, and
that incentive compensation plans like the proposed Director Plan are an
important attraction, retention and motivation tool for participants in the
plan.
The Board
of Directors approved the Director Plan based, in part, on a belief that the
plan helps attract and retain the experienced directors required for our
business to grow. Our success will depend in part upon retaining such
experienced, knowledgeable professionals. There is significant competition for
directors with the skills required to oversee the products and services we
offer. If we cannot attract, motivate and retain qualified professionals, our
business, financial condition and results of operations will
suffer.
The
Director Plan will permit the discretionary award of restricted stock units to
our employee directors and non-employee directors. Subject to the approval of
the Director Plan by our stockholders, the Board of Directors may grant such
awards commencing on the date of board approval of the Director Plan and
continuing through December 5, 2020 or the earlier termination of the Director
Plan. Increased stock ownership by our directors will further align their
interests with the interests of our stockholders and will assist us in
attracting and retaining talented directors. If stockholders do not
approve the Director Plan by April 5, 2011, the Director Plan will
terminate and any then-outstanding awards granted thereunder will be forfeited
without consideration.
As of
January 13, 2011, the fair market value of a share of our common stock, as
determined by the last transaction price quoted by the OTCBB on such date, was
$5.77.
The Board
of Directors encourages stockholders to consider the following in voting to
approve the Director Plan. The following points summarize why the
Board of Directors strongly believes the Director Plan is essential for our
future success:
|
·
|
Achieving
superior long-term results always has been a primary objective for our
company and it is essential that directors think and act like
owners. Stock ownership helps enhance the alignment of the
long-term economic interests of stockholders and
directors.
|
|
·
|
The
ability to provide different forms of equity, including restricted stock
units, provides us with an increased flexibility to examine the various
legal, tax, and design considerations raised by various forms of awards or
a combination thereof, in order to best reach its desired
outcome.
|
|
·
|
The
1,000,000 new shares of common stock that would be available for grant
under the Director Plan represents approximately only 5% of the number of
shares of common stock that are currently
outstanding.
|
The
complete text of the Director Plan is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement. Stockholders are urged to review it together with the
following information, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Exhibit A. If there is any inconsistency between the summary of the
Director Plan in this Proposal 2 and the terms of the Director Plan or if there
is any inaccuracy in the summary of the Director Plan in this Proposal 2, the
terms of the Director Plan shall govern.
Key
Features of the Director Plan
The
following are certain features of the Director Plan:
|
·
|
The
Director Plan will have a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance.
|
|
·
|
Only
restricted stock units awards may be issued under the Director
Plan.
|
|
·
|
If
not terminated earlier by the Board of Directors, the Director Plan will
terminate on December 5, 2020.
|
|
·
|
The
Director Plan is administered and controlled by the Board of
Directors.
|
|
·
|
Only
employee and non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under
the Director Plan
|
|
·
|
The
Board of Directors has the discretion to determine who shall receive any
awards and the terms and conditions of such
awards.
|
Description
of the Director Plan
Background and Purpose of the
Director Plan. The purpose of the Director Plan is to help promote the
long-term success of our company and the creation of stockholder value
by:
|
·
|
attracting
and retaining the services of talented individuals as directors of the
Company,
|
|
·
|
motivating
such directors, through the award of restricted stock units, to achieve
long-term performance goals,
|
|
·
|
providing
competitive equity and incentive compensation opportunities,
and
|
|
·
|
further
aligning the interests of our directors with stockholders through
compensation that is based upon the performance of the Company’s common
stock which can thereby promote the long-term financial interest of the
Company and enhancement of long-term stockholder
return.
|
Eligibility to Receive
Awards. Only
employee and non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the
Director Plan. The Board of Directors determines, in its discretion,
the individuals who will be granted awards under the Director
Plan. As of January 20, 2011, two employee directors and five
non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Director
Plan.
Shares Subject to the Director
Plan. The
maximum number of shares of common stock that can be issued under the Director
Plan is 1,000,000. The shares underlying forfeited or terminated
awards will become available again for issuance under the Director Plan and
shares that are utilized to pay an award's purchase price, if any, or tax
withholding obligations shall not count against the Director Plan's share
limit.
Administration of the Director
Plan. The
Director Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors. Subject
to the terms of the Director Plan, the Board of Directors has the sole
discretion, among other things, to:
|
·
|
select
the individuals who will receive
awards,
|
|
·
|
determine
the terms and conditions of awards (for example, performance goals, if
any, and vesting schedule),
|
|
·
|
correct
any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the
Director Plan or any award
agreement,
|
|
·
|
accelerate
the vesting or waive restrictions of any awards at any time and under such
terms and conditions as it deems
appropriate,
|
|
·
|
adopt
any rules, guidelines and/or procedures to implement and administer the
Director Plan, and
|
|
·
|
interpret
the provisions of the Director Plan and outstanding
awards.
|
The Board
of Directors may also use the Director Plan to issue shares under other plans or
subplans as may be deemed necessary or appropriate, such as to provide for
participation by non-U.S. directors. In addition, awards may be
subject to any policy that we may implement on the recoupment of compensation
(referred to as a clawback policy). We will indemnify the members of
the Board of Directors and their delegates to the maximum extent permitted by
applicable law for actions taken or not taken with respect to the Director
Plan.
Restricted Stock Units. A restricted stock unit
is a bookkeeping entry that represents the equivalent of a share of common
stock. A restricted stock unit is similar to a stock award except
that the participant does not have any stockholder rights until the restricted
stock unit is settled with shares. Restricted stock units issued
under the Director Plan will be evidenced by a written agreement between our
company and the director to whom the award was granted and will recite the
specific terms and conditions of the award. The Board of Directors will
determine all of the terms and conditions of the restricted stock
units awarded under the Director Plan, including the vesting period and the
number of shares of common stock subject to each award. Upon each
vesting date, the participant will become entitled to receive a share of our
common stock in exchange for each vested restricted stock unit on the settlement
date. The Board of Directors may determine that a restricted stock
unit will vest only if our company satisfies performance goals established by
the Board of Directors. Settlement of restricted stock units will
generally occur within thirty days of vesting unless the participant has timely
elected to defer such compensation or his or her written restricted stock units
agreement provides for settlement to occur on a later specified
date. For example, the written restricted stock units agreement may
provide for settlement to occur upon the termination of the participant's
service with our company.
Limited Transferability of
Awards. Awards granted under the
Director Plan generally are not transferrable other than upon death, or pursuant
to a court-approved domestic relations order.
Termination of Service Prior to
Vesting. Generally, if a director's service with our company terminates,
then the unvested restricted stock units will be surrendered to us without
compensation.
Adjustments Upon Changes in
Capitalization. In the event of a stock split, a combination,
consolidation, spin-off, recapitalization, or any other similar transaction
involving shares of our common stock prior to the settlement of a restricted
stock unit award, then the number and kind of shares issued under the Director
Plan and subject to each award, as well as the number and kind of shares
available for issuance under the Director Plan, will each be equitably and
proportionately adjusted by the Board of Directors.
Corporate Transaction. In the event that our
company is a party to a merger or other reorganization, outstanding awards
granted under the Director Plan will be subject to the agreement of merger or
reorganization. Such agreement may provide for (i) accelerated vesting of
outstanding awards, (ii) the continuation of the outstanding awards, (iii) the
assumption of the outstanding awards by the surviving entity, or (iv) the
cancellation of outstanding awards with or without consideration, in all cases
with or without consent of the director to whom the award was
granted. Except as otherwise provided in the restricted stock unit
agreement, in the event of a change in control, all then-outstanding awards will
vest and become exercisable as of immediately prior to the change in
control.
Term of the Director
Plan. If
approved by stockholders, the Director Plan will continue in effect until
December 5, 2020 or until earlier terminated by the Board of
Directors.
Governing Law. The Director
Plan will be governed by the laws of the state of Delaware except for conflict
of law provisions.
Amendment and Termination of the
Director Plan. The Board of Directors
generally may amend or terminate the Director Plan at any time and for any
reason, except that the Board of Directors must obtain stockholder approval in
certain circumstances.
Certain
Federal Income Tax Information
The
following is a general summary, as of December 31, 2010, of the federal income
tax consequences to our company and to U.S. participants for awards granted
under the Director Plan. The federal tax laws may change and the federal, state
and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon his or her
individual circumstances. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be
different. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not discuss
the tax consequences of a participant’s death or provisions of income tax laws
of any municipality, state or other country. We advise participants to consult
with their own tax advisors regarding the tax implications of their awards under
the Director Plan.
Stock Units. No taxable income is
generally reportable when unvested restricted stock units are granted to a
participant. Upon settlement of the vested restricted stock units, the
participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market
value of the shares received on the date of settlement.
Income Tax Effects for our
Company. We
generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under
the Director Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a
participant at the time the participant recognizes such income.
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code governs the federal income taxation of certain types of
nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. A violation of section 409A
generally results in an acceleration of the recognition of income of amounts
intended to be deferred and the imposition of a federal excise tax of 20% on the
recipient of the award who are our employees over and above the income tax owed
plus possible penalties and interest. The types of arrangements
covered by section 409A are broad and may apply to certain restricted stock unit
awards available under the Director Plan. As required by section 409A, certain
nonqualified deferred compensation payments to specified employees may be
delayed to the seventh month after such employee's separation from
service.
New
Benefit Plans
All
awards under the Director Plan will be granted at the discretion of our Board of
Directors. Therefore, the benefits and amounts that will be received or
allocated under the Director Plan are not presently determinable. The
following table sets forth the number of shares subject to awards granted under
the Director Plan to the below individuals and groups. All such
awards are subject to stockholder approval of the Director Plan, and if such
approval is not obtained, all such awards will be forfeited. Further,
the awards granted to date are not necessarily indicative of future grants under
the Director Plan.
Name and Position
|
Dollar Value ($)
|
|
Number of Shares Subject to Awards
|
|
James
B. DeBello, CEO and CFO
|
Not
applicable
|
|
None
|
|
Executive
Group
|
Not
applicable
|
|
None
|
|
Non-Executive
Director Group
|
Not
applicable
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Non-Executive
Officer Employee Group
|
Not
applicable
|
|
None
|
|
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ADOPTION OF THE MITEK
SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT PLAN.
PROPOSAL
NO. 3
RATIFICATION
OF SELECTION OF AUDITORS
The Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors has selected the firm of Mayer Hoffman
McCann, P.C ("Mayer Hoffman"), independent certified public accountants, to
serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2011. Representatives of Mayer Hoffman have
been invited to attend the Annual Meeting and, if they attend, will have the
opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate
questions.
During
our two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period prior to the
engagement of Mayer Hoffman, we did not consult with Mayer Hoffman with respect
to any of the matters enumerated in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or Item 304(a)(2)(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
Neither
our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification
of the selection of Mayer Hoffman as our independent registered public
accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors is submitting the appointment of Mayer Hoffman to our stockholders for
ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If our
stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of Mayer Hoffman, the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors will reconsider whether or not to retain
Mayer Hoffman. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors in its discretion may direct the appointment of
different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determine
that such a change would be in the best interests of our company and our
stockholders.
During
our two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period, there were
no disagreements on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if
not resolved to the satisfaction of Mayer Hoffman, would have caused it to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its
report and there occurred no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the SEC.
Audit
Fees
The fees
for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements for
each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, and
the reviews of our interim financial statements included in our Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q or services normally provided by Mayer Hoffman, in
connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements were
approximately $129,300 for both the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and
2009.
Audit
Related Fees
There
were no audit related fees for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 or
September 30, 2009.
Tax
Fees
There
were no fees for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning billed or expected
to be billed by our independent auditors for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2010 or September 30, 2009.
All
Other Fees
Other
than described above, there were no other fees paid to our independent
auditors.
Independence
The Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors believes there were no services provided by
our Mayer Hoffman which would affect their independence.
Pre-Approval
Policies
In
accordance with the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors has established policies and procedures by which it approves in
advance any audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our
independent auditors. Under these procedures, prior to the engagement
of the independent auditor for pre-approved services, requests or applications
for the auditors to provide services must be submitted to the Audit Committee
and must include a detailed description of the services to be
rendered. Our chief financial officer and the independent auditors
must ensure that the independent auditors are not engaged to perform the
proposed services unless those services are within the list of services that
have received the Audit Committee's pre-approval and must cause the Audit
Committee to be informed in a timely manner of all services rendered by the
independent auditors and the related fees.
Each
request or application must include:
|
·
|
a
recommendation by our chief financial officer as to whether the Audit
Committee should approve the request or application;
and
|
|
·
|
a
joint statement of our chief financial officer and the independent
auditors as to whether, in their view, the request or application is
consistent with the SEC's and the requirements for auditor independence of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
("PCAOB").
|
The Audit
Committee also will not permit the independent auditors to be engaged to provide
any services to the extent that the SEC has prohibited the provision of those
services by independent auditors, which generally include:
|
·
|
bookkeeping
or other services related to accounting records or financial
statements;
|
|
·
|
financial
information systems design and
implementation;
|
|
·
|
appraisal
or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind
reports;
|
|
·
|
internal
audit outsourcing services;
|
|
·
|
broker-dealer,
investment adviser or investment banking
services;
|
|
·
|
expert
services unrelated to the audit;
and
|
|
·
|
any service that the PCAOB
determines is not
permissible.
|
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF MAYER HOFFMAN TO SERVE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR OUR 2011 FISCAL YEAR
PROPOSAL
NO. 4
ADVISORY
VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S
NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The
compensation paid to our named executive officers is intended to align their
interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders and is based on a
pay-for-performance philosophy. It is straightforward, consisting
principally of salary, which must be competitive to retain the skills and
experience of excellent employees, annual incentive bonus to reward strong
performance upon achievement of challenging goals, and equity compensation to
encourage long-term commitment and team performance. Not all elements
may be provided every year, depending on the performance of the Company and the
executive. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors
believe that our executive compensation program is effective in implementing our
principles and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our
stockholders and that our stockholders should approve our compensation
program.
Section
14A of the Exchange Act, added under the Dodd-Frank Act, requires us to provide
our stockholders with the opportunity to approve, on an advisory (non-binding)
basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this
proxy statement under “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 14 (which
disclosure includes the compensation tables and the narrative disclosures that
accompany the compensation tables). This vote is intended to provide
an overall assessment of our executive compensation program rather than focus on
any specific item of compensation.
The
vote solicited by this proposal is advisory and its outcome will not be binding
on the Board of Directors or Company nor require the Board of Directors or
Compensation Committee to take any action. However, the Compensation
Committee values the opinions expressed by our stockholders in their vote on
this proposal and expects to take into account the outcome of this vote when
evaluating future executive compensation arrangements for the Company’s
executive officers.
The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock
voting on the matter shall be required for the stockholder advisory vote on the
overall compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in
the Executive Compensation section (including the tables and narrative therein)
of this Proxy Statement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
included in the totals for the proposal, and will have no effect on the outcome
of the vote.
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY
BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S
NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
PROPOSAL
NO. 5
ADVISORY
VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Section
14A of the Exchange Act, added under the Dodd-Frank Act, also requires us to
provide our stockholders with a separate advisory vote on the frequency of the
advisory vote set forth in Proposal 4 above. By voting on this
Proposal 5, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote
to approve the named executive officers' compensation annually, every two years,
or every three years. Stockholders also have the option to abstain
from voting on this matter.
The Board
of Directors and the Compensation Committee believe an advisory vote on
executive compensation every three years is the best approach for the Company
and our stockholders. An advisory say on pay plan vote at every third
annual meeting would provide stockholders an opportunity to make an informed and
thoughtful vote based on close analysis of our compensation
program. It will encourage a long-term approach to evaluating our
executive compensation program, consistent with our Company's long-term
philosophy on executive compensation. Additionally, a vote every
three years would allow us adequate time to compile meaningful input from
stockholders on our compensation program and respond
appropriately. This may be challenging to do on an annual or biennial
basis, and both we and our stockholders would benefit from having more time for
a thoughtful and constructive dialogue on why particular pay practices are
appropriate for us. In contrast, focusing on executive compensation
over an annual or biennial period would focus on short-term results rather than
long-term value creation, which is inconsistent with our compensation philosophy
and would detract from the long-term interests and goals of the
Company. Moreover, a short review cycle will not allow for a
meaningful evaluation of our performance against our compensation practices, as
any adjustment in pay practices would take time to implement and be reflected in
our financial performance and in the price of our common stock.
Because
this vote is advisory, it is not binding on the Board of Directors or the
Company, and the Board of Directors may decide it is in the best interests of
the Company and our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on executive
compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our
stockholders. However, the Board of Directors values the opinion of
our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when
considering the frequency of the advisory vote set forth in Proposal
4.
As for
the vote on the frequency with which stockholders shall vote on the compensation
of our named executive officers, stockholders are given four choices: every one,
two or three years or to abstain from voting on the matter. The
option that receives the plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting shall
determine the frequency of the advisory vote by stockholders on such executive
compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included
in the totals for the proposal, and will have no effect on the outcome of the
vote. If none of the alternatives receive a majority vote, we will
consider the highest number of votes cast by stockholders to be the frequency
that has been selected by stockholders.
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE OPTION OF ONCE EVERY THREE
YEARS AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE
COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors has furnished the following report to
stockholders of the Company in accordance with rules adopted by the
SEC.
As
described in its charter, the Audit Committee meets with the independent
auditors and our officers or other personnel responsible for our financial
reports. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the scope
of the auditors' examination of the Company and the audited results of the
examination. The Audit Committee is also responsible for discussing
with the auditors the scope, reasonableness and adequacy of internal accounting
controls. The Audit Committee is not responsible for the planning or
conduct of the audits or the determination that our financial statements are
complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Among other matters, the Audit Committee considers and
selects a certified public accounting firm as our independent
auditor. The Audit Committee held four meetings during fiscal
2010.
In
accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, the Audit Committee states
that:
|
·
|
The
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management our audited
financial statements for the fiscal year
2010.
|
|
·
|
The
Audit Committee has discussed with Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C., our
independent registered public accountants, the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as modified and
supplemented.
|
|
·
|
The
Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from
Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C., required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 ("Independence Discussions with Audit Committees"), as
modified and supplemented, and has discussed with the independent
registered public accountants, its
independence.
|
Based
upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to our Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, for filing with the SEC.
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
|
|
Vinton
Cunningham
|
|
Michael
Bealmear
|
|
Gerald
I. Farmer
|
INFORMATION
ABOUT OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meetings
of our Board of Directors
Our Board
of Directors schedules approximately four meetings during the fiscal year of
which one is held immediately following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
at the same location. Additional meetings may be called as the need
arises. During the 2010 fiscal year, there were four meetings of the
Board of Directors. No director attended fewer than 75 percent of the
aggregate number of meetings held by the Board of Directors and the committees
on which such director served during the 2010 fiscal year.
Board
Committees
Our Board
of Directors has appointed from among its members three committees, the Audit
Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the
Compensation Committee, to advise it on matters of special importance to the
Company. Each of the committees of the Board of Directors acts under
a written charter. Copies of the Audit Committee Charter, Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, and
Code of Ethics are available on our website at www.miteksystems.com by selecting
"About Us" and "Investor Relations."
Our
directors have a critical role in guiding our strategic direction and overseeing
our management. Board candidates are considered based upon various
criteria, such as their broad-based business and professional skills and
experiences, a global business and social perspective, concern for the long-term
interests of the stockholders, and personal integrity and
judgment. In addition, directors must have time available to devote
to board activities and to enhance their knowledge of our business.
Accordingly,
we seek to attract and retain highly qualified directors who have sufficient
time to attend to their substantial duties and responsibilities to the
Company. Developments in corporate governance and financial reporting
have resulted in an increased demand for such highly qualified and productive
public company directors.
Audit
Committee
Our Board
of Directors has appointed a standing Audit Committee which, during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010, held four meetings. The Audit
Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting
processes and the audits of our financial statements, monitoring the integrity
of our financial reporting process and systems of internal controls regarding
finance, accounting and legal compliance, and reviewing the independence and
performance of our independent registered public accountants. The
members of the Audit Committee during fiscal year 2010 were Messrs. Cunningham
and Bealmear and Dr. Farmer. Our Board of Directors has determined
that Mr. Cunningham is an "audit committee financial expert", as such term is
defined pursuant to rules promulgated by the SEC. Each of the members
of the Audit Committee is an "independent" director as defined by applicable SEC
and Nasdaq Stock Market rules and meets the other qualifications under the
regulations adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the composition and
structure of our Board of Directors, establishing criteria for board membership
and corporate policies relating to the recruitment of board members, and
establishing, implementing and monitoring policies and processes regarding
principles of corporate governance. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will consider suggestions by stockholders for
names of possible future nominees delivered in writing and received 120 days in
advance of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such recommendations
should provide all information relating to such person that the stockholder
desires to nominate that is required to be disclosed in solicitation of proxies
pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not hold
any meetings during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The
members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee during fiscal year
2010 were Dr. Farmer and Mr. Bealmear, each of whom is an "independent" director
as defined by applicable SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market rules.
Compensation
Committee
Our Board
of Directors also has appointed a Compensation Committee which reviews executive
compensation, establishes executive compensation levels, recommends employee
compensation programs and administers our stock option plans. During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee did not
hold any meetings. The members of the Compensation Committee during
fiscal year 2010 were Messrs. Tudor and Bealmear and Dr. Farmer, each of whom is
an "independent" director as defined by applicable SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market
rules.
Board
Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The
leadership structure of our board of directors is such that our chairman of our
board of directors and our chief executive officer positions are separated. Mr.
Thornton, an independent director, has served as chairman of our board of
directors since October 1987. We believe having an independent chairman of our
board of directors with extensive executive experience with the nature of our
business has provided our board of directors with consistent, experienced and
independent leadership that enhanced the effectiveness of our board of directors
as a whole. Our corporate governance guidelines do not require our board of
directors to choose an independent chairman or to separate the roles of chairman
and chief executive officer, but our board of directors believes this leadership
structure is the appropriate structure for the Company at this time. Our board
of directors may choose its chairman in any manner that it deems to be in the
best interests of the Company. If, in the future, the chairman of our board of
directors is not an independent director, our board of directors may designate
an independent director to serve as a lead independent director.
Our board
of directors is responsible for oversight of risks facing the Company, while our
management is responsible for day-to-day management of risk. Our board of
directors, as a whole, directly administers its risk oversight function. In
addition, the risk oversight function is also administered through the standing
committees of our board of directors, which oversee risks inherent in their
respective areas of responsibility, reporting to our board of directors
regularly and involving our board of directors as necessary. For example, the
audit committee oversees our financial exposure and financial reporting related
risks, and the compensation committee oversees risks related to our compensation
programs and practices. Our board of directors as a whole directly oversees our
strategic and business risk, including product development risk, through regular
interactions with our management and, from time-to-time, input from independent
advisors. We believe our board’s leadership structure supports its role in risk
oversight, with our chief executive office, president and chief financial
officer responsible for assessing and managing risks facing the Company on a
day-to-day basis and the chairman and other members of our board of directors
providing oversight of such risk management.
Director
Independence
Our board
of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Bealmear, Cunningham, Farmer
and Tudor are "independent" under the criteria established by the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules for independent board members. In addition, our
board of directors has determined that the members of our audit committee meet
the additional independence criteria required for audit committee
membership.
Stockholder
Communications to the Board
Stockholders
may contact an individual director, our Board of Directors as a group, or a
specified committee or group of our Board of Directors, including the
non-employee directors as a group, at the following address: Corporate
Secretary, Mitek Systems, Inc. 8911 Balboa Ave, Suite B, San Diego, CA 92123,
Attn: Board of Directors. We will receive and process communications
before forwarding them to the addressee. Directors generally will not
be forwarded stockholder communications that are primarily commercial in nature,
relate to improper or irrelevant topics, or request general information about
the Company.
Director
Attendance at Annual Meetings
Although
we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board of
Directors at our Annual Meeting, we encourage all of our directors to
attend. Each incumbent director nominee for election at our 2011
Annual Stockholder Meeting attended our 2010 Annual Stockholder
Meeting.
Director
Compensation
Our
Chairman receives $2,250 and all of our other non-employee directors received
$1,500 for each regularly scheduled Board meeting attended in person and $500
per meeting attended by phone. In addition, they received $500 for
each regularly scheduled committee meeting. We reimbursed our
directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our
Board of Directors. The members of the Board are eligible for
reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with their service on the
Board.
The
following table provides director compensation information for the year ended
September 30, 2010.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
|
|
|
Option Awards
($)(1)(2)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
Compensation
($)
|
|
John
M. Thornton
|
|
$ |
12,480 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
31,653 |
|
Michael
W. Bealmear
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
25,673 |
|
Vinton
P. Cunningham
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
27,173 |
|
Gerald
I. Farmer
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
27,173 |
|
Sally
B. Thornton
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
25,173 |
|
William
P. Tudor
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
25,173 |
|
(1)
|
Represents
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement report purposes with
respect to the fiscal year in accordance with ASC 718. Please
see "NOTE 4. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY," to our financial statements included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010 filed with the SEC for the relevant assumptions
used to determine the valuation of our option
awards.
|
(2)
|
The
outstanding equity awards held by each of our directors as of
September 30, 2010 are as
follows:
|
John M.
Thornton: options to acquire 100,000 shares of our common
stock;
Michael
W. Bealmear: options to acquire 75,000 shares of our common
stock;
Vinton P.
Cunningham: options to acquire 50,000 shares of our common
stock;
Gerald I.
Farmer: options to acquire 75,000 shares of our common stock;
Sally B.
Thornton: options to acquire 75,000 shares of our common stock;
and
William
P. Tudor: options to acquire 75,000 shares of our common
stock.
INFORMATION
ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Currently,
our sole executive officer is Mr. James B. DeBello. Mr. DeBello has
served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2003 and as our
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since January 2009. Mr. DeBello
is also a member of our Board of Directors. Please see "PROPOSAL NO.
1—TO ELECT SEVEN DIRECTORS" for more information regarding Mr.
DeBello
There are
no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other
person pursuant to which such executive officer was or is to be selected as an
executive officer.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table summarizes compensation paid to or earned by each of our named
executive officers:
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
|
Total
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
B. DeBello
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
335,357 |
|
|
$ |
85,257 |
|
|
$ |
92,195 |
|
|
$ |
512,809 |
|
President,
CEO and CFO
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
318,683 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
47,890 |
|
|
$ |
366,573 |
|
(1) Represents
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement report purposes with
respect to the fiscal year in accordance with ASC 718. Please see
"NOTE 4. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY," to our financial statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010
filed with the SEC for the relevant assumptions used to determine the valuation
of our option awards.
We do not
have an employment agreement in place with James B. DeBello, our President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. DeBello's
annual salary for our 2009 fiscal year was approximately $333,000. In
connection with the workforce reduction we implemented in January 2009, Mr.
DeBello's annual salary was reduced by 10% for the period May 11, 2009 through
September 30, 2009, the end of our 2009 fiscal year. Mr. DeBello's
annual salary for our 2010 fiscal year was reinstated to the full amount of
approximately $333,000. In May 2010, the Board of Directors awarded
Mr. DeBello a discretionary bonus of approximately $84,000 in recognition of our
company's improved performance. Mr. DeBello was also awarded a
discretionary bonus of approximately $1,500 with respect to a patent that we
filed in 2010. In February 2010, we granted Mr. DeBello a stock
option to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock that vests monthly
over a 36-month term and has an exercise price of $0.79 per share, which was the
fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of
grant.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table presents the
outstanding equity awards held by each of the named executive officers as of the
September 30, 2010. The only outstanding equity awards are stock
options. All options we granted to our named executive officers
during our fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, vest monthly over a
three-year period and have ten-year terms, subject to earlier termination on the
occurrence of certain events related to termination of employment. In
addition, the full vesting of options is accelerated if there is a change in
control of the Company.
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
James
B. DeBello
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
05/19/13
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
11/17/14
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
10/19/15
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
11/18/15
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
07/10/16
|
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
12/04/17
|
|
|
|
131,408 |
|
|
|
117,592 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
02/25/19
|
|
|
|
48,608 |
|
|
|
201,392 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
02/24/20
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year End
During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, no stock options were exercised by any
named executive officer.
Pension
Benefits
We do not
have any defined benefit plans at this time.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
None of
our named executive officers participate in or have account balances in
non-qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation
plans.
Employment
Arrangements and Change in Control Arrangements
The stock
option agreements of our named executive officers provide that, generally, in
case of a change of control, the option will be assumed or an equivalent option
or right substituted by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of
the successor corporation. If the successor corporation refuses to
assume or substitute for the option, then immediately before and contingent on
the consummation of the change in control, the optionee will fully vest in and
have the right to exercise his or her options.
As of
September 30, 2010, the value of the unvested, in-the-money options of our
named executive officers that would accelerate upon a change of control, based
on the difference between the closing bid price on the last trading day of the
year of $1.78 per share and the exercise price of the respective options, was as
follows:
Name
|
|
Option Value as of
September 30, 2010
|
|
James
B. DeBello
|
|
$ |
433,859 |
|
Processes
and Procedures for the Consideration and Determination of Executive and Director
Compensation
One of
the duties of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is to monitor
the performance and compensation of executive officers and other key employees,
to review compensation plans and to administer our stock option
plans. The Company's executive and key employee compensation programs
are designed to attract, motivate and retain the executive talent needed to
enhance stockholder value in a competitive environment. Our
fundamental philosophy is to relate the amount of compensation "at risk" for an
executive directly to his or her contribution to our success in achieving
superior performance goals and to the overall success of the
Company. The Company's executive and key employee compensation
program consists of a base salary component, a component providing the potential
for an annual bonus based on overall Company performance as well as individual
performance, and a component providing the opportunity to earn stock options
that focus the executives and key employees on building stockholder value
through meeting longer-term financial and strategic goals.
In
designing and administering its executive compensation program, the Company
tries to strike an appropriate balance among these various elements, each of
which is discussed in greater detail below.
In
applying these elements to arrive at specific amounts or awards, the members of
the Compensation Committee apply their subjective evaluation of these various
factors and arrive at consensus through discussion. While specific
numerical criteria may be used in evaluating achievement of individual or
Company goals, the extent of achieving such goals is then factored in with other
more subjective criteria to arrive at the final compensation or award
decision.
Base Salary. Our
salary program is designed to reflect individual performance related to our
overall financial performance as well as competitive practice. Salary
reviews are typically performed annually in conjunction with a performance
review. Salary increases are dependent on the achievement of
individual and corporate performance goals.
The Executive and Key Employee Bonus
Plan. The Executive and Key Employee Bonus Plan is designed to
reward our executives and other key employees for their contributions to
corporate goals. Corporate goals are established as part of the
annual operating plan process. Overall corporate goals include target
levels of pre-tax, pre-bonus profit and net revenue.
Bonus
achievement is dependent upon meeting or exceeding our minimum goals for
pre-tax, pre-bonus and net revenue. In May 2010, the Board of
Directors awarded Mr. DeBello a discretionary bonus of approximately $84,000 in
recognition of our company's improved performance. Mr. DeBello was
also awarded a discretionary bonus of approximately $1,500 with respect to a
patent that we filed in 2010.
Stock Option
Plans. We currently have four stock option plans that have
been approved by our stockholders that allow us to grant options to purchase
common stock to our directors, executive officers and key individuals who make,
or are expected to make, significant contributions to the Company.
Our stock
option plans are designed to:
|
·
|
Encourage
and create ownership and retention of our
stock;
|
|
·
|
Balance
long-term with short-term decision
making;
|
|
·
|
Link
the officers' or key employees' financial success to that of the
stockholders;
|
|
·
|
Focus
attention on building stockholder value through meeting longer-term
financial and strategic goals; and
|
|
·
|
Ensure
broad-based participation of key employees (all employees currently
participate in the Stock Option
Plans).
|
We
currently have four stock option plans that allow us to grant options to
purchase common stock to our directors, executive officers and key individuals
who make, or are expected to make, significant contributions to the
Company. We also currently maintain one stock option plan, the 1999
Stock Option Plan that has options outstanding that were previously granted
under the plan but under which no further options may be granted.
Under the
terms of the 2000 Stock Option Plan, the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the 2006 Stock
Option Plan and the 2010 Stock Option Plan, each of which provides for the grant
of incentive and non-qualified options: (i) incentive stock options are granted
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock at the
grant date and for a term of not more than ten years; (ii) non-qualified stock
options may be granted with an exercise price of not less than 85% of fair
market value of our common stock at the grant date and for a term of not more
than five years; and (iii) the exercise price of options granted to persons
owning more than 10% of the total combined voting power of our stock is not to
be less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock as determined on
the date of the grant of the options. To date, we have elected to grant
non-qualified stock options under these plans with a three year
term.
The 1999
Plan provides for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common
stock. The 1999 Plan terminated on June 10, 2009; however options
granted under the plan that were outstanding at such date remain in effect until
such options are exercised or expire. As of September 30, 2010,
options to purchase 651,750 shares of our common stock were outstanding and no
options were available for grant under the 1999 Plan.
The 2000
Plan provides for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.
The 2000 Plan terminated on December 13, 2010; however options granted under the
plan that were outstanding at such date remain in effect until such options are
exercised or expire. As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase
821,116 shares of our common stock were outstanding and no options were
available for grant under the 2000 Plan.
The 2002
Plan provides for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common
stock. As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase 924,662 shares
of our common stock were outstanding and options to purchase up to 9,795 shares
of our common stock were available for grant under the 2002 Plan.
The 2006
Plan provides for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common
stock. As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase 921,216 shares
of our common stock were outstanding and options to purchase up to 7,100 shares
of our common stock were available for grant under the 2006 Plan.
The 2010
Plan provides for the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of our common
stock. As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase 815,584 shares
of our common stock were outstanding and options to purchase 1,184,416 shares of
our common stock were available for grant under the 2010 Plan.
Additionally,
under a compensation agreement with Mr. DeBello, in 2003 he was granted options
to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.06 per
share.
401(k) Savings
Plan. In 1990, we established an Employee Savings Plan (the
"Savings Plan") intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code"), which is available to all
employees who satisfy specified age and service requirement. The
Savings Plan allows an employee to defer up to 15% of such employee's
compensation for the pay period elected in his or her salary deferral agreement
on a pre-tax basis pursuant to a cash or deferred arrangement under
Section 401(k) of the Code (subject to maximums permitted under
federal law). This contribution will generally not be subject to
federal tax until it is distributed from the Savings Plan. In
addition these contributions are fully vested and
non-forfeitable. Contributions to the Savings Plan are deposited in a
trust fund established in connection with the Savings Plan. We may
make discretionary contributions to the Savings Plan at the end of each fiscal
year as deemed appropriate by our Board of Directors. Vested amounts
allocated to each participating employee are distributed in the event of
retirement, death, disability or other termination of employment. For
fiscal 2010 the Compensation Committee determined that participants would not
receive a matching contribution.
Other Compensation
Plans. We have adopted certain broad-based employee benefit
plans in which executive officers have been permitted to
participate. The incremental cost to us of benefits provided to
executive officers under these life and health insurance plans is less than 10%
of the base salaries for executive officers for fiscal 2010. Benefits
under these broad-based plans are not directly or indirectly tied to company
performance.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
following table presents information concerning the beneficial ownership of the
shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2010, by:
|
·
|
each
person we know to be the beneficial owner of 5% of more of our outstanding
shares of common stock,
|
|
·
|
each
of our named executive officers and current directors and
director nominees, and
|
|
·
|
all
of our current executive officers and directors as a
group.
|
We have
determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except
as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information
furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have
sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that
they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property
laws.
Applicable
percentage ownership is based on 20,319,378 shares of common stock outstanding
on December 31, 2010. In computing the number of shares of common
stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that
person, we deemed as outstanding shares of common stock subject to options or
warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of December 31, 2010. We did not deem these shares
outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of
any other person.
Except as
indicated by the footnotes below, the business address for each of these
stockholders is c/o Mitek Systems, Inc., 8911 Balboa Ave., Suite B,
San Diego, CA 92123.
Name
of Beneficial Owner or Identify of Group
|
|
Number
of shares of
common
stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
Percent
of
Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
M. and Sally B. Thornton (1)
|
|
|
2,881,879 |
|
|
|
14.11 |
% |
James
B. DeBello (2)
|
|
|
1,867,160 |
|
|
|
8.42 |
% |
Alex
W. "Pete" Hart (3)
|
|
|
136,726 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William
P. Tudor (4)
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael
W. Bealmear (5)
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vinton
P. Cunningham (6)
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerald
I. Farmer (7)
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Directors
and Executive Officers as a Group (seven individuals)(8)
|
|
|
5,235,765 |
|
|
|
23.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Percent Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
M. and Sally B. Thornton (1)
|
|
|
2,881,879 |
|
|
|
14.11 |
% |
John
Harland Company (9)
|
|
|
2,464,284 |
|
|
|
11.94 |
% |
Prescott
Group Capital Management LLC (10)
|
|
|
1,666,985 |
|
|
|
8.20 |
% |
(1)
|
John
M. Thornton and Sally B. Thornton, husband and wife, are trustees of a
family trust, and are each directors of the Company. Includes
100,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(2)
|
Consists
of 1,867,160 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(3)
|
Includes
50,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(4)
|
Includes
50,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(5)
|
Includes
25,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(6)
|
Includes
50,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(7)
|
Includes
50,000 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(8)
|
Includes
2,192,160 shares of common stock subject to
options.
|
(9)
|
Based
solely on Schedule 13G filed by the beneficial owner with the SEC on
May 13, 2005. The stockholder's address is 2939 Miller Road, Decatur,
Georgia 30035.
|
(10)
|
Based
solely on Schedule 13G/A filed by the beneficial owner with the SEC
on February 14, 2008. This stockholder's address is 1924
South Utica, Suite 1120, Tulsa, OK
74104-6529.
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
The table
below sets forth information as of September 30, 2010, with respect to
compensation plans under which our common stock is authorized for
issuance. The figures related to the equity compensation plan
approved by security holders relate to our 1999 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock
Option Plan, 2002 Stock Option Plan, 2006 Stock Option Plan and 2010 Stock
Option Plan. We do not have any equity compensation plans that have
not been approved by security holders.
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders
|
|
|
4,534,328 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
1,201,311 |
|
Our 1999 Stock Option Plan, which
provided for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock through
incentive and non-qualified stock options, terminated on June 10, 2009; however
options granted under the plan that were outstanding at such date remain in
effect until such options are exercised or expired. As of September
30, 2010, there were options outstanding to purchase 651,750 shares of our
common stock.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Review
of Related Party Transactions
It is our
policy and procedure to have all transactions with a value above $120,000,
including loans, between us and our officers, directors and principal
stockholders and their affiliates, reviewed and approved by a majority of our
board of directors, including a majority of the independent and disinterested
members of our board of directors, and that such transactions be on terms no
less favorable to us than those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third
parties. We believe that all of the transactions described below were reviewed
and approved under the foregoing policies and procedures.
Related
Transactions
Except as
noted below, there have been no related party transactions with any of our
directors, executive officers or five percent stockholders in the last three
fiscal years.
John H.
Harland Company beneficially owns more than five percent of our outstanding
common stock. We realized revenue of approximately $59,000 and
$67,000 from transactions between us and John H. Harland Company and its
subsidiary, Harland Financial Solutions (collectively "John Harland"), during
the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
September 30, 2010, there was an outstanding accounts receivable balance of
approximately $4,000 due from John Harland, compared to a balance of
approximately $10,000 at September 30, 2009.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors and
persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the
SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are
required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of
Forms, 3, 4, and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us, we are not aware of
any director, officer or beneficial owner of 10% of our common stock that failed
to file on a timely basis as disclosed on the above forms, reports required by
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
during fiscal year 2010.
HOUSEHOLDING
OF PROXY MATERIALS
Some
banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the
practice of "householding" proxy statements and annual reports. This means that
only one copy of our proxy statement or annual report to stockholders may have
been sent to multiple stockholders in each household. We will promptly deliver a
separate copy of either document to any stockholder upon written or oral
request, free of charge. To make such a request, please contact us at Mitek
Systems, Inc., Corporate Secretary, 8911 Balboa Ave., Suite B, San Diego, CA
92123 or contact us at (858) 503-7810. Any stockholder who wants to receive
separate copies of our proxy statement or annual report in the future, or any
stockholder who is receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one
copy per household, should contact the stockholder's bank, broker, or other
nominee record holder, or the stockholder may contact us at the above address
and phone number.
PROPOSALS
OF STOCKHOLDERS
For
proposals of stockholders to be included in our proxy materials to be
distributed in connection with our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
anticipated to be held in February 2012, we must receive such proposals at our
principal executive offices in writing no later than September 24,
2011. The acceptance of such proposals is subject to Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") guidelines. Any stockholder proposal
submitted with respect to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which is
received by us after December 7, 2011 will be considered untimely for purposes
of Rule 14a-4 and Rule 14a-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and our
Board of Directors may vote against such proposal using its discretionary voting
authority as authorized by proxy.
OTHER
BUSINESS
The
Annual Meeting is called for the purposes set forth in the attached Notice of
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We are not aware of any matters for
action by stockholders at this meeting other than those described in the
Notice. The enclosed proxy, however, will confer discretionary
authority with respect to matters that are not known at the date of printing
hereof and which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment
thereof. The proxy holders intend to vote in accordance with their
best judgment on any such matters.
PLEASE
COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
San
Diego, California
|
John
M. Thornton
|
January
20, 2011
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
APPENDIX
A
MITEK
SYSTEMS, INC.
DIRECTOR
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT PLAN
(as
amended and restated on January 12, 2011)
1. INTRODUCTION.
The
Company's Board of Directors originally adopted the Mitek Systems, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan to be effective on the Adoption
Date conditioned on and subject to obtaining Company stockholder approval as
provided in Section 10 below. The Board amended and restated and
renamed the Plan to be the Mitek Systems, Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit
Plan on January 12, 2011, conditioned on and subject to obtaining Company
stockholder approval as provided in Section 10 below, in order to allow
Directors to be eligible to participate in the Plan. Awards
granted under the Plan prior to the Stockholder Approval Date may not be settled
or Shares released to any Participant until such stockholder approval is
obtained.
The
purpose of the Plan is to (i) attract and retain the services of persons
eligible to participate in the Plan; (ii) motivate Directors and Non-Employee
Directors, by means of appropriate equity incentives, to achieve long-term
performance goals; (iii) provide equity and incentive compensation opportunities
that are competitive with those of other similar companies; and (iv) further
align Participants' interests with those of the Company's other stockholders
through compensation that is based on the Company's common stock and thereby
promote the long-term financial interest of the Company and its affiliates,
including the growth in value of the Company's equity and enhancement of
long-term stockholder return.
The Plan
seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for Awards in the form of Restricted
Stock Units.
This Plan
and all Awards shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of
the State of Delaware, but without regard to its conflict of law
provisions. Capitalized terms shall have the meaning provided in
Section 2 unless otherwise provided in this Plan or any applicable Award
agreement.
2. DEFINITIONS.
(a) "Adoption
Date" means December 6, 2010.
(b) "Affiliate"
means any entity other than a Subsidiary, if the Company and/or one or more
Subsidiaries own not less than 50% of such entity. For purposes of
determining an individual's "Service," this definition shall include any entity
other than a Subsidiary, if the Company, a Parent and/or one or more
Subsidiaries own not less than 50% of such entity.
(c) "Award"
means any award of Restricted Stock Units under the Plan.
(d) "Board"
means the Board of Directors of the Company, as constituted from time to
time.
(e) "Cause"
means, except as may otherwise be provided in a Participant's Award agreement
(and in such case the Award agreement shall govern as to the definition of
Cause), the occurrence of any one or more of the following: (i) dishonesty,
incompetence or gross negligence in the discharge of the Participant's duties;
(ii) theft, embezzlement, fraud, breach of confidentiality, or unauthorized
disclosure or use of inside information, recipes, processes, customer and
employee lists, trade secrets, or other Company proprietary
information; (iii) willful material violation of any law, rule, or
regulation of any governing authority or of the Company's policies and
procedures, including without limitation the Company's Code of Ethics and Code
of Conduct; (iv) material breach of any agreement with the Company; (v)
intentional conduct which is injurious to the reputation, business or assets of
the Company; (vi) solicitation of Employees to work for any other business
entity; and/or (vii) any other act or omission by a Participant that, in the
opinion of the Board, could reasonably be expected to materially adversely
affect the Company's or a Subsidiary's or an Affiliate's business, financial
condition, prospects and/or reputation.
(f) "Change
in Control" means, except as may otherwise be provided in a Participant's Award
agreement (and in such case the Award agreement shall govern as to the
definition of Change in Control), the consummation of any one or more of the
following:
(i)
a change in the ownership of the Company within the meaning of
Code section 409A;
(ii) a
change in the effective control of the Company within the meaning of Code
section 409A; or
(iii) change
in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company within
the meaning of Code section 409A; or
(iv) the
consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the
Company.
A
transaction shall not constitute a Change in Control if its sole purpose is to
change the state of the Company's incorporation or to create a holding company
that will be owned in substantially the same proportions by the persons who held
the Company's securities immediately before such transactions.
(g) "Code"
means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations and
interpretations promulgated thereunder.
(h) "Common
Stock" means the Company's common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and any
other securities into which such shares are changed, for which such shares are
exchanged or which may be issued in respect thereof.
(i) "Company"
means Mitek Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
(j) "Consultant"
means an individual who performs bona fide services to the Company, a Parent, a
Subsidiary or an Affiliate, other than as an Employee or Director or
Non-Employee Director.
(k) "Director"
means a member of the Board who is also an Employee.
(l)
"Disability" means, except as may otherwise be
provided in a Participant's Award agreement (and in such case the Award
agreement shall govern as to the definition of Disability), that the Participant
is classified as disabled under a long-term disability policy of the Company or,
if no such policy applies, the Participant is unable to engage in any
substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or
mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted
or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12
months. For all purposes with respect to the Plan, the Disability of
a Participant shall be determined solely by the Board on the basis of such
medical evidence as the Board deems warranted under the
circumstances.
(m) "Employee"
means any individual who is a common-law employee of the Company (including any
individual who is also a Director), or of a Parent, or of a Subsidiary or of an
Affiliate.
(n) "Exchange
Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(o) "Fair
Market Value" means the market price of a Share and shall be equal to the
closing price (or closing bid, if no sales were reported) for a Share on such
day as quoted by the exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Common
Stock is listed (or the exchange or market with the greatest trading volume, if
quoted or listed on more than one exchange or market). If there is no
closing sale or closing bid price, the closing sales or bid price shall be the
price on the last preceding day for which such quotation exists. If
the Common Stock is not listed or quoted on an exchange or over-the-counter
market, the Board shall determine the fair market value in good
faith.
Whenever
possible, the determination of Fair Market Value shall be based on the prices
reported by the applicable exchange or the OTC Bulletin Board, as applicable, or
a nationally recognized publisher of stock prices or quotations (including an
electronic on-line publication). Such determination shall be
conclusive and binding on all persons.
(p) "Fiscal
Year" means the Company's fiscal year.
(q) "Non-Employee
Director" means a member of the Board who is not an Employee.
(r)
"Officer" means an individual who is an officer of the Company
within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act.
(s)
"Parent" means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken
chain of corporations ending with the Company, if each of the corporations other
than the Company owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations
in such chain. A corporation that attains the status of a Parent on a
date after the Adoption Date shall be considered a Parent commencing as of such
date.
(t)
"Participant" means an individual or estate or other
entity that holds an Award.
(u) "Plan"
means this Mitek Systems, Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan as it may be
amended from time to time.
(v) "Restricted
Stock Unit" means a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of one Share,
as awarded under the Plan and as provided in Section 6.
(w) "Restricted
Stock Unit Agreement" means the agreement described in Section 6 evidencing each
Award of Restricted Stock Units.
(x) "SEC"
means the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(y) "Securities
Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(z)
"Separation From Service" has the meaning provided to such term
under Code Section 409A and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
(aa) "Service"
means service as an Employee, Director, Non-Employee Director or
Consultant. Service will be deemed terminated as soon as the entity
to which Service is being provided is no longer either (i) the Company, (ii) a
Parent, (iii) a Subsidiary or (iv) an Affiliate. The Board determines
when Service commences and terminates for all purposes with respect to the
Plan.
(bb) "Share"
means one share of Common Stock.
(cc) "Stockholder
Approval Date" means the date that the Company's stockholders approve this
Plan.
(dd) "Subsidiary"
means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of
corporations beginning with the Company, if each of the corporations other than
the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing fifty percent
(50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one
of the other corporations in such chain. A corporation that attains
the status of a Subsidiary on a date after the Adoption Date shall be considered
a Subsidiary commencing as of such date.
3. ADMINISTRATION.
(a) Authority of the
Board. The Board shall administer the Plan. Subject
to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have full authority and
discretion to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable. Such
actions shall include without limitation:
(i)
determining Directors and Non-Employee Directors who
are to receive Awards under the Plan;
(ii) determining
the type, number, vesting requirements, performance objectives (if any) and
their degree of satisfaction, and other features and conditions of such Awards
and amending such Awards;
(iii) correcting
any defect, supplying any omission, or reconciling or clarifying any
inconsistency in the Plan or any Award agreement;
(iv) accelerating
the vesting, or extending the post-termination exercise term, or waiving
restrictions, of Awards at any time and under such terms and conditions as it
deems appropriate;
(v) interpreting
the Plan and any Award agreements;
(vi) making
all other decisions relating to the operation of the Plan; and
(vii) granting
Awards to Directors and Non-Employee Directors who are foreign nationals on such
terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan, which may be
necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of the
Plan, and adopting such modifications, procedures, and/or subplans (with any
such subplans attached as appendices to the Plan) and the like as may be
necessary or desirable to comply with provisions of the laws or regulations of
other countries or jurisdictions to ensure the viability of the benefits from
Awards granted to Participants employed in such countries or jurisdictions, or
to meet the requirements that permit the Plan to operate in a qualified or tax
efficient manner, and/or comply with applicable foreign laws or
regulations.
The Board
may adopt such rules or guidelines, as it deems appropriate to implement the
Plan. The Board's determinations under the Plan shall be final,
conclusive and binding on all persons. The Board's decisions and
determinations need not be uniform and may be made selectively among
Participants in the Board's sole discretion. The Board's decisions
and determinations will be afforded the maximum deference provided by applicable
law.
(b) Indemnification. To
the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, each member of the Board, and
any persons (including without limitation Employees and Officers) who are
delegated by the Board to perform administrative functions in connection with
the Plan, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from
(i) any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably
incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action,
suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may
be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan or
any Award agreement, and (ii) from any and all amounts paid by him or her in
settlement thereof, with the Company's approval, or paid by him or her in
satisfaction of any judgment in any such claim, action, suit, or proceeding
against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at
its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to
handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of
indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to
which such persons may be entitled under the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation or Bylaws, by contract, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or under
any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them
harmless.
4. GENERAL.
(a) General
Eligibility. Only Directors and Non-Employee Directors shall
be eligible to be granted Awards under the Plan.
(b) Restrictions on
Shares. Any Shares issued pursuant to an Award shall be
subject to such Company policies, rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal
and other transfer restrictions as the Board may determine. Such
restrictions shall apply in addition to any restrictions that may apply to
holders of Shares generally and shall also comply to the extent necessary with
applicable law. In no event shall the Company be required to issue
fractional Shares under this Plan.
(c) Beneficiaries. A
Participant may designate one or more beneficiaries with respect to an Award by
timely filing the prescribed form with the Company. A beneficiary
designation may be changed by filing the prescribed form with the Company at any
time before the Participant's death. If no beneficiary was designated
or if no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, then after a
Participant's death any vested Award(s) shall be transferred or distributed to
the Participant's estate.
(d) Stockholder
Rights. A Participant, or a transferee of a Participant, shall
have no rights as a stockholder (including without limitation voting rights or
dividend or distribution rights) with respect to any Common Stock covered by an
Award until such person becomes entitled to receive such Common Stock, has
satisfied any applicable withholding or tax obligations relating to the Award
and the Common Stock has been issued to the Participant. No
adjustment shall be made for cash or stock dividends or other rights for which
the record date is prior to the date when such Common Stock is
issued.
(e) Termination of
Service. Unless the applicable Award agreement provides
otherwise (and in such case, the Award agreement shall govern as to the
consequences of a termination of Service for such Awards), if the Service of
Participant is terminated for any reason, then all unvested portions of any
outstanding Awards shall be forfeited without consideration as of the
Participant's Separation From Service.
(f) Code Section
409A. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary,
the Plan and Awards granted hereunder are intended to comply with the
requirements of Code Section 409A and shall be interpreted in a manner
consistent with such intention. If upon a Participant's Separation
From Service, he/she is then a "specified employee" (as defined in Code Section
409A), then solely to the extent necessary to comply with Code Section 409A and
avoid the imposition of taxes under Code Section 409A, the Company shall defer
payment of "nonqualified deferred compensation" subject to Code Section 409A
payable as a result of and within six (6) months following such Separation From
Service until the earlier of (i) the first business day of the seventh month
following the Participant's Separation From Service, or (ii) ten (10) days after
the Company receives written confirmation of the Participant's
death. Any such delayed payments shall be made without
interest.
(g) Electronic
Communications. Subject to compliance with applicable law
and/or regulations, an Award agreement or other documentation or notices
relating to the Plan and/or Awards may be communicated to Participants by
electronic media.
(h) Unfunded
Plan. Insofar as it provides for Awards, the Plan shall be
unfunded. Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with
respect to Participants who are granted Awards under this Plan, any such
accounts will be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The
Company shall not be required to segregate any assets which may at any time be
represented by Awards, nor shall this Plan be construed as providing for such
segregation, nor shall the Company or the Board be deemed to be a trustee of
stock or cash to be awarded under the Plan.
(i) Liability of
Company. The Company (or members of the Board) shall not be
liable to a Participant or other persons as to: (i) the non-issuance or sale of
Shares as to which the Company has been unable to obtain from any regulatory
body having jurisdiction the authority deemed by the Company's counsel to be
necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder; and (ii) any
unexpected or adverse tax consequence or any tax consequence expected, but not
realized, by any Participant or other person due to the grant, receipt, or
settlement of any Award granted hereunder.
(j) Reformation. In
the event any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any
reason, such provisions will be reformed by the Board if possible and to the
extent needed in order to be held legal and valid. If it is not
posible to reform the illegal or invalid provisions then the illegality or
invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan
shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not
been included.
(k) Tax
Withholding. A Participant shall make arrangements
satisfactory to the Company for the satisfaction of any withholding tax
obligations that arise in connection with his or her Award. The
Company shall not be required to issue any Shares or make any cash payment under
the Plan until any such obligations are satisfied.
(l) Successor
Provision. Any reference to a statute, rule or regulation, or
to a section of a statute, rule or regulation, is a reference to that statute,
rule, regulation, or section as amended from time to time, both before and after
the Adoption Date and including any successor provisions.
5. SHARES
SUBJECT TO PLAN AND SHARE LIMITS.
(a) Basic
Limitation. The Common Stock issuable under the Plan shall be
authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares. Subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 7, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that
may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 1,000,000 Shares (the "Share
Limit").
(b) Share
Utilization. If Awards are forfeited or are terminated for any
reason other than being settled for consideration, then the Shares underlying
such forfeited Awards shall not be counted against the Share
Limit. Only the number of Shares actually issued in settlement of
Restricted Stock Units shall be counted against the Share Limit. Any
Shares that are delivered and any Awards that are granted by, or become
obligations of, the Company, as a result of the assumption by the Company of, or
in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by another entity (as
provided in Sections 6(h) shall not be counted against the Share
Limit.
(c) Dividend
Equivalents. Any dividend equivalents distributed under the
Plan shall not be counted against the Share Limit.
6. TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.
(a) Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement. Each grant of Restricted Stock Units under the Plan
shall be evidenced by a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Participant
and the Company. Such Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to all
applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other
terms and conditions that are not inconsistent with the Plan (including without
limitation any performance objectives). The provisions of the various
Restricted Stock Unit Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be
identical. Restricted Stock Units may be granted in consideration of
a reduction in the Participant's other compensation.
(b) Number of
Shares. Each Restricted Stock Unit Agreement shall specify the
number of Shares to which the Restricted Stock Unit grant pertains and is
subject to adjustment of such number in accordance with Section 7.
(c) Payment for
Awards. Generally, no cash consideration shall be required of
the Award recipients in connection with the grant of an Award.
(d) Vesting
Conditions. Each Award of Restricted Stock Units may or may
not be subject to vesting. Vesting shall occur, in full or in
installments, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in the Restricted
Stock Unit Agreement. A Restricted Stock Unit Agreement may provide
for accelerated vesting only in the event of a Change in Control.
(e) Voting and Dividend
Rights. The holders of Restricted Stock Units shall have no
voting rights. Prior to settlement or forfeiture, any Restricted
Stock Unit awarded under the Plan may, at the Board's discretion, carry with it
a right to dividend equivalents. Such right entitles the holder to be
credited with an amount equal to all cash or Common Stock dividends paid on one
Share while the Restricted Stock Unit is outstanding. Dividend
equivalents may be converted into additional Restricted Stock
Units. Settlement of dividend equivalents may be made in the form of
cash, in the form of Shares, or in a combination of both. Prior to
vesting of the Restricted Stock Units, any dividend equivalents accrued on such
unvested Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same vesting conditions
and restrictions as the Restricted Stock Units to which they
attach.
(f) Form and Time of Settlement
of Restricted Stock Units. Settlement of vested Restricted
Stock Units may be made in the form of Shares only. The actual number
of Restricted Stock Units eligible for settlement may be larger or smaller than
the number included in the original Award. Except as otherwise
provided in a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement or a timely completed deferral
election, vested Restricted Stock Units shall be settled within thirty days
after vesting. The distribution may occur or commence when all
vesting conditions applicable to the Restricted Stock Units have been satisfied
or have lapsed, or it may be deferred, in accordance with applicable law, to a
later specified date. The amount of a deferred distribution may be
increased by an interest factor or by dividend equivalents. Until an
Award of Restricted Stock Units is settled, the number of such Restricted Stock
Units shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 7.
(g) Creditors'
Rights. A holder of Restricted Stock Units shall have no
rights other than those of a general creditor of the
Company. Restricted Stock Units represent an unfunded and unsecured
obligation of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.
(h) Modification or Assumption
of Restricted Stock Units. Within the limitations of the Plan,
the Board may modify or assume outstanding Restricted Stock Units or may accept
the cancellation of outstanding Restricted Stock Units (including stock units
granted by another issuer) in return for the grant of new Restricted Stock Units
for the same or a different number of Shares. No modification of a
Restricted Stock Unit shall, without the consent of the Participant, impair his
or her rights or increase his or her obligations under such Restricted Stock
Unit.
(i) Assignment or Transfer of
Restricted Stock Units. Except as provided in Section 4(c), or
in a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, or as required by applicable law,
Restricted Stock Units shall not be anticipated, assigned, attached, garnished,
optioned, transferred or made subject to any creditor's process, whether
voluntarily, involuntarily or by operation of law. Any act in
violation of this Section 6(i) shall be void. However, this Section
6(i) shall not preclude a Participant from designating a beneficiary pursuant to
Section 4(c) nor shall it preclude a transfer of Restricted Stock Units pursuant
to Section 4(c).
7. ADJUSTMENTS.
(a) Adjustments. In
the event of a subdivision of the outstanding Shares, a declaration of a
dividend payable in Shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in a form other
than Shares in an amount that has a material effect on the price of Shares, a
combination or consolidation of the outstanding Shares (by reclassification or
otherwise) into a lesser number of Shares, a stock split, a reverse stock split,
a reclassification or other distribution of the Shares without the receipt of
consideration by the Company, of or on the Common Stock, a recapitalization, a
combination, a spin-off or a similar occurrence, the Board shall make equitable
and proportionate adjustments to:
(i)
the Share Limit specified in Section 5(a);
(ii) the
number and kind of securities available for Awards under Section 5;
(iii) the
number and kind of securities covered by each outstanding Award;
and
(iv) the
number and kind of outstanding securities issued under the
Plan.
(b) Participant
Rights. Except as provided in this Section 7, a Participant
shall have no rights by reason of any issue by the Company of stock of any class
or securities convertible into stock of any class, any subdivision or
consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend
or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any
class. If by reason of an adjustment pursuant to this Section 7, a
Participant's Award covers additional or different shares of stock or
securities, then such additional or different shares and the Award in respect
thereof shall be subject to all of the terms, conditions and restrictions which
were applicable to the Award and the Shares subject to the Award prior to such
adjustment.
(c) Fractional
Shares. Any adjustment of Shares pursuant to this Section 7
shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number of Shares. Under no
circumstances shall the Company be required to authorize or issue fractional
shares. To the extent permitted by applicable law, no consideration
shall be provided as a result of any fractional shares not being issued or
authorized.
8. EFFECT
OF A CHANGE IN CONTROL.
(a) Merger or
Reorganization. In the event that there is a Change in Control
and/or the Company is a party to a merger or acquisition or reorganization or
similar transaction, outstanding Awards shall be subject to the merger agreement
or other applicable transaction agreement. Such agreement may
provide, without limitation, that subject to the consummation of the applicable
transaction, for the assumption (or substitution) of outstanding Awards by the
surviving corporation or its parent, for their continuation by the Company (if
the Company is a surviving corporation), for accelerated vesting or for their
cancellation with or without consideration, in all cases without the consent of
the Participant.
(b) Acceleration. Except
as otherwise provided in an applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (and in
such case the applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement shall govern), in the
event that a Change in Control occurs, then all then-outstanding Awards shall
fully vest as of immediately before such Change in Control.
9. LIMITATIONS
ON RIGHTS.
(a) Retention
Rights. Neither the Plan nor any Award granted under the Plan
shall be deemed to give any individual a right to remain in Service as an
Employee, Consultant, Director or Non-Employee Director or to receive any other
Awards under the Plan. The Company and its Parents and Subsidiaries
and Affiliates reserve the right to terminate the Service of any person at any
time, and for any reason, subject to applicable laws, the Company's Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws.
(b) Regulatory
Requirements. Any other provision of the Plan notwithstanding,
the obligation of the Company to issue Shares or other securities under the Plan
shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and such approval
by any regulatory body as may be required. The Company reserves the
right to restrict, in whole or in part, the delivery of Shares or other
securities pursuant to any Award prior to the satisfaction of all legal
requirements relating to the issuance of such Shares or other securities, to
their registration, qualification or listing or to an exemption from
registration, qualification or listing.
(c) Clawback
Policy. The Board may (i) cause the cancellation of any Award,
(ii) require reimbursement of any Award by a Participant and (iii) effect any
other right of recoupment of equity or other compensation provided under this
Plan or otherwise in accordance with Company policies and/or applicable law
(each, a "Clawback Policy"). In addition, the Board may require that
a Participant repay to the Company certain previously paid compensation, whether
provided under this Plan or an Award Agreement or otherwise, in accordance with
the Clawback Policy.
10. DURATION
AND AMENDMENTS.
(a) Term of the
Plan. The Plan, as set forth herein, is effective on the
Adoption Date provided, however, that the Plan is subject to the approval of the
Company's stockholders within 120 days of the Adoption Date. If the
Stockholder Approval Date does not occur before 120 days after the Adoption
Date, then the Plan shall terminate as of the 121st day
after the Adoption Date and any Awards granted under the Plan shall also
immediately terminate without consideration to any Award holder. If
the stockholders timely approve the Plan, then the Plan shall terminate on the
day before the tenth anniversary of the Adoption Date and may be terminated on
any earlier date pursuant to this Section 10. This Plan will not in
any way affect outstanding awards that were issued under any other Company
equity compensation plans.
(b) Right to Amend or Terminate
the Plan. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any
time and for any reason subject to obtaining stockholder approval only to the
extent required by applicable law or by the rules of an applicable stock
exchange. No Awards shall be granted under the Plan after the Plan's
termination. In addition, no such amendment or termination shall be
made which would impair the rights of any Participant, without such
Participant's written consent, under any then-outstanding Award. In
the event of any conflict in terms between the Plan and any Award agreement, the
terms of the Plan shall prevail and govern.
11. EXECUTION.
To record
the adoption of the Plan by the Board, the Company has caused its duly
authorized Officer to execute this Plan on behalf of the
Company.
|
MITEK
SYSTEMS, INC, a Delaware corporation
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ James B. DeBello
|
|
|
James
B. DeBello
|
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|