Edgar Filing: FIRST NATIONAL CORP /VA/

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-23976

LOGO

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Virginia		54-1232965
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

112 West King Street, Strasburg, Virginia		22657
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(540) 465-9121

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of May 11, 2012, 2,955,649 shares of common stock, par value $1.25 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets		3

	Consolidated Statements of Income		4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)		6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		7

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity		9

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		10

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		28

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		40

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		40

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		41

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		41

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		41

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		41

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		41

Item 5.	Other Information		41

Item 6.	Exhibits		41

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	9,477		$	6,314
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		19,553			23,210
Securities available for sale, at fair value		84,627			91,665
Restricted securities, at cost		2,775			2,775
Loans held for sale		329			274
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses, 2012, $13,636, 2011, $12,937		376,758			379,503
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance, 2012, $2,455, 2011, $2,792		5,562			6,374
Premises and equipment, net		19,446			19,598
Interest receivable		1,523			1,620
Other assets		8,193			7,731

Total assets	$	528,243		$	539,064


Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	85,043		$	81,714
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		204,682			198,194
Time deposits		174,870			189,264

Total deposits	$	464,595		$	469,172
Other borrowings		14,094			19,100
Trust preferred capital notes		9,279			9,279
Other liabilities		4,131			4,417

Total liabilities	$	492,099		$	501,968


Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation preference; 14,595 shares issued and outstanding	$	14,299		$	14,263
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share; authorized 8,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2012 and 2011, 2,955,649 shares		3,695			3,695
Surplus		1,644			1,644
Retained earnings		16,753			16,503
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		(247	)		991

Total shareholders’ equity	$	36,144		$	37,096


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	528,243		$	539,064

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Income

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands, except per share data)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012			(unaudited) March 31, 2011
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	5,547		$	5,833
Interest on federal funds sold		3			7
Interest on deposits in banks		3			7
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale:
Taxable interest		535			451
Tax-exempt interest		102			123
Dividends		18			17

Total interest and dividend income	$	6,208		$	6,438


Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	$	986		$	1,303
Interest on trust preferred capital notes		62			109
Interest on other borrowings		80			91

Total interest expense	$	1,128		$	1,503


Net interest income	$	5,080		$	4,935
Provision for loan losses		2,000			270

Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$	3,080		$	4,665


Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	502		$	501
ATM and check card fees		372			371
Trust and investment advisory fees		346			342
Fees for other customer services		98			73
Gains on sale of loans		43			47
Gains on sale of securities available for sale, net		1,117			—
Other operating income		36			6

Total noninterest income	$	2,514		$	1,340


Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	$	2,369		$	2,288
Occupancy		326			341
Equipment		306			325
Marketing		78			105
Stationery and supplies		81			79
Legal and professional fees		250			201
ATM and check card fees		156			171
FDIC assessment		178			190
Bank franchise tax		76			105
Provision for other real estate owned		401			130
Other real estate owned expense		253			126
Net gains on sale of other real estate owned		(90	)		—
Telecommunications expense		61			90
Data processing		90			63
Other operating expense		369			341

Total noninterest expense	$	4,904		$	4,555

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Continued)

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands, except per share data)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012		(unaudited) March 31, 2011

Income before income taxes	$	690	$	1,450
Income tax provision		215		447

Net income	$	475	$	1,003


Effective dividend on preferred stock		224		223


Net income available to common shareholders	$	251	$	780


Earnings per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.08	$	0.26

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands, except per share data)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012			(unaudited) March 31, 2011

Net income	$	475		$	1,003
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities		(150	)		308
Reclassification adjustment, net		(1,117	)		—

Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities		(1,267	)		308
Tax effect		29			181

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,238	)		127

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(763	)	$	1,130

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012			(unaudited) March 31, 2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	475		$	1,003
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		283			298
Origination of loans held for sale		(1,692	)		(3,170	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		1,679			3,338
Gains on sale of loans held for sale		(43	)		(47	)
Provision for loan losses		2,000			270
Provision for other real estate owned		401			130
Gains on sale of securities available for sale, net		(1,117	)		—
Net gains on sale of other real estate owned		(90	)		—
Accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on securities, net		171			104
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in interest receivable		97			35
Increase in other assets		(463	)		(439	)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(256	)		542

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,445		$	2,064


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	$	24,217		$	—
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal payments of securities available for sale		7,726			2,733
Purchase of securities available for sale		(25,226	)		(8,885	)
Increase in federal funds sold		—			(7,500	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(131	)		(16	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		2,423			182
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(1,176	)		3,897

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	7,833		$	(9,589	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts	$	9,817		$	9,653
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		(14,394	)		4,570
Proceeds from other borrowings		—			10,000
Principal payments on other borrowings		(5,006	)		(10,005	)
Cash dividends paid on common stock		—			(259	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		(189	)		(190	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(9,772	)	$	13,769


Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(494	)	$	6,244

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning	$	29,524		$	15,997

Ending	$	29,030		$	22,241

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Continued)

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands)


	(unaudited) March 31, 2012			(unaudited) March 31, 2011
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	1,154		$	1,514


Income taxes	$	—		$	—


Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	(1,267	)	$	308


Transfer from loans to other real estate owned	$	1,922		$	2,292


Loan originated from sale of other real estate owned	$	—		$	640


Issuance of common stock, dividend reinvestment plan	$	—		$	36

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000			0000000		0000000
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	14,127	$	3,686	$	1,582	$	28,969		$	134	$	48,498
Net income		—		—		—		1,003			—		1,003
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			127		127
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.10 per share)		—		—		—		(295	)		—		(295	)
Issuance of 3,402 shares common stock, dividend reinvestment plan		—		4		32		—			—		36
Cash dividends on preferred stock		—		—		—		(190	)		—		(190	)
Accretion on preferred stock discount		33		—		—		(33	)		—		—

Balance, March 31, 2011	$	14,160	$	3,690	$	1,614	$	29,454		$	261	$	49,179

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000			0000000			0000000
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	14,263	$	3,695	$	1,644	$	16,503		$	991		$	37,096
Net income		—		—		—		475			—			475
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—		—			(1,238	)		(1,238	)

Cash dividends on preferred stock		—		—		—		(189	)		—			(189	)
Accretion on preferred stock discount		36		—		—		(36	)		—			—

Balance, March 31, 2012	$	14,299	$	3,695	$	1,644	$	16,753		$	(247	)	$	36,144

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 1.

General

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of First National Corporation (the Company) and its subsidiaries, including First Bank (the Bank), have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and reclassifications of a normal and recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly the financial positions at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the results of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU removed from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this ASU were effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occurred on or after the effective date. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic 820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective application. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments were effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.” The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by ASU 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

Note 2.

Securities

The Company invests in U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate equity securities. Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

		000000000		000000000		000000000			000000000
	(in thousands) March 31, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	72,893	$	1,328	$	(102	)	$	74,119
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		9,780		620		(12	)		10,388
Corporate equity securities		26		94		—			120

	$	82,699	$	2,042	$	(114	)	$	84,627

		000000000		000000000		000000000			000000000
	(in thousands) December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	76,549	$	2,343	$	(16	)	$	78,876
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		11,895		781		—			12,676
Corporate equity securities		26		87		—			113

	$	88,470	$	3,211	$	(16	)	$	91,665

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, investments in an unrealized loss position that were temporarily impaired were as follows:


	(in thousands) March 31, 2012
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)			Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)		Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	10,802	$	(102	)	$	—	$	—	$	10,802	$	(102	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		550		(12	)		—		—		550		(12	)

	$	11,352	$	(114	)	$	—	$	—	$	11,352	$	(114	)


	(in thousands) December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)			Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)		Fair Value		Unrealized (Loss)
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	3,955	$	(16	)	$	—	$	—	$	3,955	$	(16	)

The tables above provide information about securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve consecutive months and securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for twelve consecutive months or more. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Impairment is considered to be other-than temporary if the Company (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (3) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis. Presently, the Company does not intend to sell any of these securities, does not expect to be required to sell these securities, and expects to recover the entire amortized cost of all the securities.

At March 31, 2012, there were six U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities and one obligation of state and political subdivisions in an unrealized loss position. One hundred percent of the Company’s investment portfolio is considered investment grade. The weighted-average re-pricing term of the portfolio was 3.7 years at March 31, 2012.

The Company’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock totaled $1.9 million at March 31, 2012. FHLB stock is generally viewed as a long-term investment and as a restricted security, which is carried at cost, because there is a minimal market for the stock. Therefore, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2012, and no impairment has been recognized. FHLB stock is shown in restricted securities on the balance sheet and is not part of the available for sale securities portfolio.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 3.

Loans

Loans at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:


	(in thousands)
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	49,893	$	48,363
Secured by 1-4 family residential		125,628		122,339
Other real estate loans		175,738		181,141
Commercial and industrial loans		29,449		29,446
Consumer and other loans		9,686		11,151

Total loans	$	390,394	$	392,440
Allowance for loan losses		13,636		12,937

Loans, net	$	376,758	$	379,503

Consumer loans included $100 thousand and $325 thousand of demand deposit overdrafts at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company considers the following risk characteristics of each loan portfolio class:

•

Residential mortgage loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral.

•

Real estate construction loans carry risks that the project may not be finished according to schedule, the project may not be finished according to budget and the value of the collateral may, at any point in time, be less than the principal amount of the loan. Construction loans also bear the risk that the general contractor, who may or may not be a loan customer, may be unable to finish the construction project as planned because of financial pressure unrelated to the project.

•

Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business or a real estate project, in addition to other risks associated with the ownership of real estate, because repayment of these loans may be dependent upon the profitability and cash flows of the business or project. In addition, there is risk associated with the value of collateral other than real estate which may depreciate over time and cannot be appraised with as much reliability.

•

Consumer loans carry risk associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and the value of the collateral, i.e. rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles, or lack thereof. Consumer loans are more likely than real estate loans to be immediately adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy, or other changes in circumstances.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following table provides a summary of loan classes and an aging of past due loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	March 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		> 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Non-accrual Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing

Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	1,610	$	206	$	26	$	1,842	$	48,051	$	49,893	$	661	$	—
1-4 family residential		1,216		599		605		2,420		123,537		125,628		2,007		238
Other real estate loans		2,928		1,187		3,181		7,296		168,442		175,738		7,540		131
Commercial and industrial		194		251		158		603		28,846		29,449		162		—
Consumer and other loans		64		—		—		64		9,622		9,686		—		—

Total	$	6,012	$	2,243	$	3,970	$	12,225	$	378,498	$	390,394	$	10,370	$	369


	December 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		> 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Non-accrual Loans		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing

Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,267	$	1,029	$	235	$	3,531	$	44,832	$	48,363	$	235	$	—
1-4 family residential		4,179		471		688		5,338		117,001		122,339		3,043		98
Other real estate loans		3,863		562		722		5,147		175,994		181,141		8,367		361
Commercial and industrial		950		93		5		1,048		28,398		29,446		163		—
Consumer and other loans		94		19		14		127		11,024		11,151		33		—

Total	$	11,353	$	2,174	$	1,664	$	15,191	$	377,249	$	392,440	$	11,841	$	459

Credit Quality Indicators

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to the risk grading of specified classes of loans.

The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a rating to each of its loans. The loan ratings are summarized into the following categories: pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Pass rated loans include all risk rated credits other than those included in special mention, substandard or doubtful. Loans classified as loss are charged-off. Loan officers assign risk grades to loans at origination and as renewals arise. The Bank’s Credit Administration department reviews risk grades for accuracy on a quarterly basis and as delinquency issues arise. In addition, a certain amount of loans are reviewed each year through the Company’s internal and external loan review process. A description of the general characteristics of the loan grading categories is as follows:

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or the Bank’s credit position at some future date.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation in full of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weakness inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The Company considers all doubtful loans to be impaired and places the loan on non-accrual status.

The following tables provide an analysis of the credit risk profile of each loan class as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	26,414	$	5,490	$	17,989	$	—	$	49,893
Secured by 1-4 family residential		111,006		4,057		10,377		188		125,628
Other real estate loans		133,705		16,956		25,077		—		175,738
Commercial and industrial		23,403		1,039		4,937		70		29,449
Consumer and other loans		9,606		80		—		—		9,686

Total	$	304,134	$	27,622	$	58,380	$	258	$	390,394


	December 31, 2011 (in thousands)
	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	23,172	$	7,504	$	17,452	$	235	$	48,363
Secured by 1-4 family residential		108,240		5,645		8,266		188		122,339
Other real estate loans		138,255		17,123		22,348		3,415		181,141
Commercial and industrial		23,451		949		4,976		70		29,446
Consumer and other loans		11,058		79		—		14		11,151

Total	$	304,176	$	31,300	$	53,042	$	3,922	$	392,440

Note 4.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:


	(in thousands)
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
Balance at beginning of year	$	12,937		$	16,036		$	16,036
Provision charged to operating expense		2,000			12,380			270
Loan recoveries		125			310			87
Loan charge-offs		(1,426	)		(15,789	)		(3,225	)

Balance at end of period	$	13,636		$	12,937		$	13,168

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following tables present, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total allowance for loan losses, the allowance by impairment methodology and loans by impairment methodology.


	March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
	Commercial and Industrial			Other Real Estate			Construction and Land Development			Secured by 1-4 Family Residential			Consumer and Other Loans			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2011	$	963		$	5,192		$	2,843		$	3,766		$	173		$	12,937
Charge-offs		—			(503	)		(369	)		(481	)		(73	)		(1,426	)
Recoveries		5			52			—			2			66			125
Provision for loan losses		(170	)		649			679			854			(12	)		2,000

Ending Balance, March 31, 2012	$	798		$	5,390		$	3,153		$	4,141		$	154		$	13,636


Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment		134			574			1,062			1,041			—			2,811
Collectively evaluated for impairment		664			4,816			2,091			3,100			154			10,825

Loans:
Ending Balance		29,449			175,738			49,893			125,628			9,686			390,394

Individually evaluated for impairment		481			9,453			5,742			5,946			—			21,622
Collectively evaluated for impairment		28,968			166,285			44,151			119,682			9,686			368,772


	December 31, 2011 (in thousands)
	Commercial and Industrial			Other Real Estate			Construction and Land Development			Secured by 1-4 Family Residential			Consumer and Other Loans			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2010	$	858		$	9,187		$	4,050		$	1,681		$	260		$	16,036
Charge-offs		(348	)		(7,551	)		(2,983	)		(4,639	)		(268	)		(15,789	)
Recoveries		3			—			50			6			251			310
Provision for loan losses		450			3,556			1,726			6,718			(70	)		12,380

Ending Balance, December 31, 2011	$	963		$	5,192		$	2,843		$	3,766		$	173		$	12,937


Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment		309			351			930			848			—			2,438
Collectively evaluated for impairment		654			4,841			1,913			2,918			173			10,499

Loans:
Ending Balance		29,446			181,141			48,363			122,339			11,151			392,440

Individually evaluated for impairment		480			10,940			7,640			6,860			—			25,920
Collectively evaluated for impairment		28,966			170,201			40,723			115,479			11,151			366,520

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Impaired loans and the related allowance at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, were as follows:

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000
	March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment with No Allowance		Recorded Investment with Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Real estate loans:
Construction	$	6,118	$	634	$	5,108	$	5,742	$	1,062	$	5,571	$	82
Secured by 1-4 family		7,060		1,507		4,439		5,946		1,041		4,488		55
Other real estate loans		13,963		7,480		1,973		9,453		574		10,879		30
Commercial and industrial		481		—		481		481		134		480		5
Consumer and other loans		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	27,622	$	9,621	$	12,001	$	21,622	$	2,811	$	21,418	$	172

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000
	December 31, 2011 (in thousands)
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment with No Allowance		Recorded Investment with Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	8,106	$	3,531	$	4,109	$	7,640	$	930	$	7,077	$	367
Secured by 1-4 family		8,566		3,495		3,365		6,860		848		6,519		301
Other real estate loans		15,165		8,135		2,805		10,940		351		23,918		396
Commercial and industrial		480		—		480		480		309		660		27
Consumer and other loans		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	32,317	$	15,161	$	10,758	$	25,920	$	2,438	$	38,174	$	1,091

The “Recorded Investment” amounts in the table above represent the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the table. The “Unpaid Principal Balance” represents the outstanding principal balance on each loan represented in the table plus any amounts that have been charged off on each loan and/or payments that have been applied towards principal on non-accrual loans.

As of March 31, 2012, loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) and included in impaired loans in the disclosure above totaled $5.4 million. At March 31, 2012, $1.4 million of the loans classified as TDRs were performing under the restructured terms and were not considered non-performing assets. There were $11.4 million in TDRs at December 31, 2011. There were no new loans modified under TDRs during the three month period ended March 31, 2012. There were no TDRs that defaulted during the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 5.

Other Real Estate Owned

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, OREO totaled $5.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively. OREO is primarily comprised of residential lots, raw land, non-residential properties and residential properties associated with commercial relationships, and are located primarily in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Changes in the balance for OREO are as follows:

		0000000000			0000000000
	(in thousands)
	For the three months ended March 31, 2012			For the year ended December 31, 2011
Balance at the beginning of year, gross	$	9,166		$	7,302
Transfers from loans		1,922			8,117
Charge-offs		(738	)		(2,022	)
Sales proceeds		(2,423	)		(3,321	)
Gain (loss) on disposition		90			(910	)
Balance at the end of period, gross		8,017			9,166
Less: allowance for losses		(2,455	)		(2,792	)

Balance at the end of period, net	$	5,562		$	6,374

Changes in the allowance for OREO losses are as follows:

		0000000000			0000000000
	(in thousands)
	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Balance at beginning of year	$	2,792		$	3,341
Provision for losses		401			130
Charge-offs, net		(738	)		(445	)

Balance at end of period	$	2,455		$	3,026

Net expenses applicable to OREO, other than the provision for losses, were $253 thousand and $126 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 6.

Other Borrowings

The Bank had unused lines of credit totaling $94.0 million available with non-affiliated banks at March 31, 2012. This amount primarily consists of a blanket floating lien agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) under which the Bank can borrow up to 19% of its total assets.

At March 31, 2012, the Bank had borrowings from the FHLB system totaling $14.0 million which mature through December 28, 2018. The interest rate on these notes payable ranged from 1.47% to 2.04% and the weighted average rate was 1.81%. The Bank also had a letter of credit from the FHLB totaling $30.0 million at March 31, 2012. The Bank had collateral pledged on these borrowings and letter of credit, including real estate loans totaling $110.1 million and FHLB stock with a book value of $1.9 million.

At March 31, 2012, the Bank had a $94 thousand note payable, secured by a deed of trust, which requires monthly payments of $2 thousand and matures January 3, 2016. The fixed interest rate on this loan is 4.00%.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 7.

Capital Requirements

A comparison of the capital of the Company and the Bank at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 with the minimum regulatory guidelines were as follows:


											Minimum
						(dollars in thousands)					To Be Well
	Actual					Minimum Capital Requirement					Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
March 31, 2012:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	50,595		12.74	%	$	32,071		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	49,968		12.59	%	$	32,031		8.00	%	$	40,039		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	45,522		11.46	%	$	16,036		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	44,902		11.32	%	$	16,016		4.00	%	$	24,023		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Consolidated	$	45,522		8.60	%	$	21,173		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	44,902		8.46	%	$	21,220		4.00	%	$	26,525		5.00	%

December 31, 2011:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	50,359		12.51	%	$	32,192		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	49,761		12.38	%	$	32,154		8.00	%	$	40,193		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	45,231		11.24	%	$	16,096		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	44,639		11.11	%	$	16,077		4.00	%	$	24,116		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Consolidated	$	45,231		8.45	%	$	21,408		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
First Bank	$	44,639		8.30	%	$	21,517		4.00	%	$	26,896		5.00	%

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 8.

Trust Preferred Capital Notes

On June 8, 2004, First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities. On June 17, 2004, $5.0 million of trust preferred securities were issued through a pooled underwriting. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest. The interest rate at March 31, 2012 was 3.07%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of June 17, 2034, and were subject to varying call provisions that began September 17, 2009. The principal asset of Trust II is $5.2 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities with maturities and interest rates comparable to the trust preferred securities. The Trust’s obligations under the trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

On July 24, 2006, First National (VA) Statutory Trust III (Trust III), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On July 31, 2006, $4.0 million of trust preferred securities were issued through a pooled underwriting. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest. The interest rate at March 31, 2012 was 2.18%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of October 1, 2036, and are subject to varying call provisions beginning October 1, 2011. The principal asset of Trust III is $4.1 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities with maturities and interest rates comparable to the trust preferred securities. The Trust’s obligations under the trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

While these securities are debt obligations of the Company, they are included in capital for regulatory capital ratio calculations. Under present regulations, the trust preferred securities may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy purposes as long as their amount does not exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital, including total trust preferred securities. The portion of the trust preferred securities not considered as Tier 1 capital, if any, may be included in Tier 2 capital. At March 31, 2012, the total amount of trust preferred securities issued by the Trusts was included in the Company’s Tier 1 capital.

Note 9.

Benefit Plans

The Bank has a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time employees over 21 years of age with at least one year of credited service and hired prior to May 1, 2011. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and average compensation for the five highest-paid consecutive years of service. The Bank’s funding practice has been to make at least the minimum required annual contribution permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Components of the net periodic benefit cost of the plan for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:


	(in thousands)
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011

Service cost	$	106		$	90
Interest cost		67			76
Expected return on plan assets		(69	)		(85	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1			1
Amortization of net loss		22			9

Net periodic benefit cost	$	127		$	91

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, that it expected to contribute $509 thousand to its pension plan for the 2012 plan year. The Company is planning to make the contribution for the 2012 plan year during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

In addition to the defined benefit pension plan, the Company maintains a 401(k) plan and an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) for eligible employees. The Bank also maintains a Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan that provides life insurance coverage to insurable directors. See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for additional information about the Company’s benefit plans.

Note 10.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. There are no potential common shares that would have a dilutive effect. The average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per common share were 2,955,649 and 2,949,166 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 11.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” topic of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.


Level 1 –		Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 –		Valuation is based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The valuation may be based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 –		Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which determination of fair value requires a significant management judgment or estimation.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available for sale

Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2).

The following tables present the balances of financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

		0000000000000		0000000000000		0000000000000		0000000000000
			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
Description	Balance as of March 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Securities available for sale
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	74,119	$	—	$	74,119	$	—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		10,388		—		10,388		—
Corporate equity securities		120		120		—		—

	$	84,627	$	120	$	84,507	$	—

		0000000000000		0000000000000		0000000000000		0000000000000
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 (in thousands)
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Securities available for sale
U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities	$	78,876	$	—	$	78,876	$	—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		12,676		—		12,676		—
Corporate equity securities		113		113		—		—

	$	91,665	$	113	$	91,552	$	—

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Loans held for sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Company records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. No nonrecurring fair value adjustments were recorded on loans held for sale during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

Impaired Loans

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans or the present value of expected future cash flows. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other real estate owned

Loans are transferred to other real estate owned (OREO) when the collateral securing them is foreclosed on or acquired through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The measurement of loss associated with other real estate owned is based on the fair value of the collateral compared to the unpaid loan balance and anticipated costs to sell the property. If there is a contract for the sale of a property, and management reasonably believes the contract will be executed, fair value is based on the sale price in that contract (Level 1). Lacking such a contract, the value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. Any fair value adjustments to other real estate owned are recorded in the period incurred and expensed against current earnings.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following tables summarize the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the periods:


			Carrying Value at March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
Description	Balance as of March 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Impaired loans, net	$	9,190	$	—	$	1,887	$	7,303
Other real estate owned, net		5,562		—		2,027		3,535


			Carrying Value at December 31, 2011 (in thousands)
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Impaired loans, net	$	8,320	$	—	$	7,213	$	1,107
Other real estate owned, net		6,374		—		6,374		—

The following table displays quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for March 31, 2012:

Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for March 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)

Fair
Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range

Assets

Impaired loans

7,303

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

10%

Discount for lack of marketability
and age of appraisal

0%-23%

Other real estate owned

3,535

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

Discount for lack of marketability
and age of appraisal

0-30%

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2012, were as follows:


	Carrying Value at March 31, 2012 (in thousands)
	Impaired Loans			Other Real Estate Owned

Balance, December 31, 2011	$	1,107		$	—
Increase in carrying value		188			—
Transfers into Level 3		6,562			3,535
Transfers out of Level 3		(554	)		—

Balance, March 31, 2012	$	7,303		$	3,535

Accounting guidance requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.

Loans

For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for all other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Borrowings

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of all other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Unfunded Credits

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The fair value of stand-by letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit was immaterial.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:


	(in thousands) Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 using
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3		Balance

Financial Assets
Cash and short-term investments	$	29,030		29,030		—		—	$	29,030
Securities		84,627		120		84,507		—		84,627
Loans, net		376,758		—		373,197		7,303		380,500
Loans held for sale		329		—		329		—		329
Accrued interest receivable		1,523		—		1,523		—		1,523

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	464,595		—		442,408		—	$	442,408
Other borrowings		14,094		—		14,127		—		14,127
Trust preferred capital notes		9,279		—		8,811		—		8,811
Accrued interest payable		340		—		340		—		340


	(in thousands) December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value

Financial Assets
Cash and short-term investments	$	29,524	$	29,524
Securities		91,665		91,665
Loans, net		379,503		383,557
Loans held for sale		274		274
Accrued interest receivable		1,620		1,620

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	469,172	$	471,771
Other borrowings		19,100		19,137
Trust preferred capital notes		9,279		8,576
Accrued interest payable		366		366

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities and borrowing wholesale funding with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 12.

Capital Purchase Program

On March 13, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement—Standard Terms (collectively, the Purchase Agreement) with the Treasury Department, pursuant to which the Company sold (i) 13,900 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $1.25 per share and liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Preferred Stock) and (ii) a warrant (the Warrant) to purchase 695 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the Warrant Preferred Stock), at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $13.9 million in cash. The Treasury immediately exercised the Warrant and, after net settlement, received 695 shares of the Company’s Warrant Preferred Stock, which has a liquidation preference amount of $1,000 per share. Closing of the sale occurred on March 13, 2009 and increased Tier 1 and total capital by $13.9 million. The Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum. The Warrant Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 9% per annum from the date of issuance. The discount on the Preferred Stock is amortized over a five year period using the constant effective yield method.

Note 13.

Subsequent Event

On May 7, 2012, the Company entered into Standby Purchase Agreements with certain investors to purchase up to $1.7 million of shares not subscribed to by the Company’s existing shareholders in a rights offering of up to $11.8 million that will be offered pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 the Company filed with the SEC on May 8, 2012, but has not yet become effective.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The Company makes forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding profitability, liquidity, adequacy of capital, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy, and financial and other goals. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:

•

the ability to raise capital as needed;

•

adverse economic conditions in the market area and the impact on credit quality and risks inherent in the loan portfolio such as repayment risk and fluctuating collateral values;

•

additional future losses if our levels of non-performing assets do not moderate and if the proceeds we receive upon liquidation of assets are less than the carrying value of such assets;

•

further increases of non-performing assets may reduce interest income and increase net charge-offs, provision for loan losses, and operating expenses;

•

the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses related to specific reserves on impaired loans, and changes in factors considered such as general economic and business conditions in the market area and overall asset quality;

•

the adequacy of the valuation allowance for other real estate owned related to changes in economic conditions and local real estate activity;

•

loss or retirement of key executives;

•

the ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive banking industry;

•

legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards, may adversely affect the businesses that the Company is engaged in;

•

the ability to implement various technologies into our operations may impact the Company’s ability to operate profitably;

•

the ability of the Company to implement its disaster recovery plan in the event of a natural disaster;

•

risks related to the timing of the recoverability of the deferred tax asset, which is subject to considerable judgment, and the risk that even after the recovery of the deferred tax asset balance under GAAP, there will remain limitations on the ability to include our deferred tax assets for regulatory capital purposes;

•

increases in FDIC insurance premiums could adversely affect the Company’s profitability;

•

the ability to retain customers and secondary funding sources if the Bank’s reputation would become damaged;

•

the reliance on secondary sources, such as Federal Home Loan Bank advances, sales of securities and loans, federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks and out-of-market time deposits, to meet liquidity needs;

•

changes in interest rates could have a negative impact on the Company’s net interest income and an unfavorable impact on the Bank’s customers’ ability to repay loans; and

•

other factors identified in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, past results of operations do not necessarily indicate future results. The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition at March 31, 2012 and results of operations of the Company for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q and in Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011. The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 may not be indicative of the results to be achieved for the year.

Executive Overview

The Company

First National Corporation (the Company) is the bank holding company of:

•

First Bank (the Bank). The Bank owns:

•

First Bank Financial Services, Inc.

•

Shen-Valley Land Holdings, LLC

•

First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II)

•

First National (VA) Statutory Trust III (Trust III)

First Bank Financial Services, Inc. invests in entities that provide title insurance and investment services. Shen-Valley Land Holdings, LLC was formed to hold other real estate owned and future office sites. The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities.

Products, Services, Customers and Locations

The Bank’s primary market area is located within the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia, including Shenandoah County, Warren County, Frederick County and the City of Winchester. Within the market area there are various types of industry including health care, government, retail, manufacturing and construction. Customers include individuals, small and medium-sized businesses, local governmental entities and non-profit organizations.

The Bank provides loan, deposit, investment, trust and asset management and other products and services in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. Loan products and services include personal loans, residential mortgages, home equity loans and commercial loans. Deposit products and services include checking, savings, NOW accounts, money market accounts, IRA accounts, certificates of deposit and cash management accounts. The Bank offers other services, including internet banking, mobile banking, remote deposit capture and other traditional banking services.

The Bank’s Trust and Asset Management Department offers a variety of trust and asset management services including estate planning, investment management of assets, trustee under an agreement, trustee under a will, individual retirement accounts, estate settlement and benefit plans. The Bank offers financial planning and brokerage services for its customers through its investment division, First Financial Advisors.

The Bank’s products and services are provided through 10 branch offices, 30 ATMs and its website, www.therespowerinone.com. The Bank operates six of its offices under the “Financial Center” concept. A Financial Center offers all of the Bank’s financial services at one location. This concept allows loan, deposit, trust and investment advisory personnel to be readily available to serve customers throughout the Bank’s market area. The location and general character of these properties is further described in Part I, Item 2 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Revenue Sources and Expense Factors

The primary source of revenue is from net interest income earned by the Bank. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense and typically represents between 75% to 80% of the Company’s total revenue. Interest income is determined by the amount of interest-earning assets outstanding during the period and the interest rates earned on those assets. The Bank’s interest expense is a function of the amount of interest-bearing liabilities outstanding during the period and the interest rates paid. In addition to net interest income, noninterest income is the other source of revenue for the Company. Noninterest income is derived primarily from service charges on loans and deposits and fees earned from other services. The Bank generates fee income from other services that include trust and investment advisory services and through the origination and sale of residential mortgages.

The provision for loan losses and noninterest expense are the two major expense categories. The provision is determined by factors that include net charge-offs, asset quality, economic conditions and loan growth. Changing economic conditions caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond the Company’s control have a direct correlation with asset quality, net charge-offs and ultimately the required provision for loan losses. The largest component of noninterest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 was salaries and employee benefits, comprising 48% of noninterest expenses, followed by occupancy and equipment expense, comprising 13% of expenses and provision for other real estate owned, comprising 8% of expenses.

Quarterly Performance

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, net income totaled $475 thousand compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2011. After the effective dividend on preferred stock, net income available to common shareholders was $251 thousand, or $0.08 per basic and diluted share, compared to $780 thousand, or $0.26 per basic and diluted share, for the same period in 2011. First quarter 2012 results reflect total provisions for loan losses and other real estate owned of $2.4 million, compared to $400 thousand for the first quarter of 2011. Net interest income was 3%, or $145 thousand, higher than for the first quarter of 2011 and noninterest income was 4%, or $57 thousand, higher than for the first quarter of 2011, excluding gains on the sale of securities. Noninterest expense was 4%, or $168 thousand, higher when comparing the two periods, excluding the provision for other real estate owned and net gains on sale of other real estate owned. Return on assets and return on equity were 0.36% and 5.17%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2012 compared to 0.74% and 8.31% for the same quarter in 2011.

Net interest income totaled $5.1 million for the first quarter of 2012, which was a 3% increase when comparing the first quarter of 2012 to the same period a year ago. The net interest margin increased to 4.14% from 3.89%, which was partially offset by a 4% decrease in average earning assets. The margin improvement was attributed to lower cost of funds and interest income adjustments on non-accrual loans.

Net charge-offs were $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared to $3.1 million for the same quarter of 2011. The provision for loan losses was $2.0 million which resulted in a total allowance for loan losses of $13.6 million or 3.49% of total loans at March 31, 2012. The provision was primarily the result of net charge-offs and specific reserves on impaired loans that reflected lower collateral values. The provision for loan losses was $270 thousand and the allowance totaled $13.2 million or 3.09% of total loans at March 31, 2011.

Noninterest income totaled $1.4 million for the first quarter of 2012, excluding gains on sale of securities, which was 4% higher compared to the same quarter of 2011. The increase in noninterest income, excluding securities gains, resulted from higher revenue from fees for other customer services, including loan fees. Performance from other noninterest income categories, such as service charges on deposit accounts, ATM and check card income, and trust and investment advisory revenue, was consistent when comparing the periods.

Noninterest expense, excluding the provision for other real estate owned and net gains on sale of other real estate owned, was $4.6 million for the first quarter of 2012, compared to $4.4 million for the same quarter of 2011, resulting in an efficiency ratio of 70.27% compared to 69.67% for the prior year period. The increase in expense was primarily attributable to expenses related to other real estate owned. The provision for other real estate owned, which represents write-downs of carrying values on foreclosed properties, totaled $401 thousand for the first quarter compared to $130 thousand for the same period in the prior year.

Management Outlook

Net interest income is expected to decrease slightly during the remainder of 2012 from downward pressure on the net interest margin. Although total average earning asset balances are expected to remain relatively stable during 2012, we expect lower loan balances and higher securities balances to result in a lower net interest margin for 2012. The Company is anticipating economic conditions to remain stable in the local market, which should result in stable loan and deposit balances.

Noninterest income, excluding gains on sales of securities, is not expected to change significantly for the remainder of 2012, when compared to first quarter results. The Company does not expect a significant change in noninterest expense for 2012, excluding the provision for OREO and gains and losses on sale of OREO, when compared to first quarter results.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses provides prudent coverage of the risks in the loan portfolio, and the carrying value of other real estate owned reflects current market conditions and the Bank’s disposition plans. However, we expect that additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary in the future, the amount of which will be influenced by changes in the Bank’s loan customers’ ability to pay which is affected by real estate values, economic conditions, and other factors. In addition, the amount of the provision for other real estate owned and gains or losses that may occur from the sale of other real estate owned may be impacted by changes in real estate values.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This report refers to the efficiency ratio, which is computed by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains and losses. This is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company believes provides investors with important information regarding operational efficiency. Such information is not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be construed as such. Management believes, however, such financial information is meaningful to the reader in understanding operating performance, but cautions that such information not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP. The Company, in referring to its net income, is referring to income under GAAP. The components of the efficiency ratio calculation are summarized in the table below.


	Efficiency Ratio (in thousands)
	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011

Noninterest expense	$	4,904		$	4,555
Less: provision for other real estate owned		401			130
Less: net (gains) losses on sale of other real estate owned		(90	)		—

	$	4,593		$	4,425


Tax-equivalent net interest income	$	5,139		$	5,011
Noninterest income		2,514			1,340
Less: securities gains (losses)		1,117			—

	$	6,536		$	6,351


Efficiency ratio		70.27	%		69.67	%

This report also refers to net interest margin, which is calculated by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by total average earning assets. Because a portion of interest income earned by the Company is nontaxable, the tax equivalent net interest income is considered in the calculation of this ratio. Tax equivalent net interest income is calculated by adding the tax benefit realized from interest income that is nontaxable to total interest income then subtracting total interest expense. The tax rate utilized in calculating the tax benefit for each of 2012 and 2011 is 34%. The reconciliation of tax equivalent net interest income, which is not a measurement under GAAP, to net interest income, is reflected in the table below.


	Reconciliation of Net Interest Income to Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income (in thousands)
	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011

GAAP measures:
Interest income - loans	$	5,547	$	5,833
Interest income - investments and other		662		605
Interest expense - deposits		986		1,303
Interest expense - other borrowings		80		91
Interest expense - other		62		109

Total net interest income	$	5,080	$	4,935

Non-GAAP measures:
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - loans	$	8	$	13
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - municipal securities		51		63

Total tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income	$	59	$	76

Total tax-equivalent net interest income	$	5,139	$	5,011

Critical Accounting Policies

General

The Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial information contained within the statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Bank uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses

could differ significantly from the historical factors used. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact transactions could change. For further information about the Bank’s loans and the allowance for loan losses, see Notes 3 and 4 to consolidated financial statements, included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Presented below is a discussion of those accounting policies that management believes are the most important (“Critical Accounting Policies”) to the portrayal and understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Critical Accounting Policies require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management determines that the loan balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. For further information about the Company’s loans and the allowance for loan losses, see Notes 3 and 4.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to absorb any losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. Management’s judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based on evaluations of the collectability of loans while taking into consideration such factors as trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay and the value of the collateral, overall portfolio quality and review of specific potential losses. The evaluation also considers the following risk characteristics of each loan portfolio class:

•

Residential mortgage loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral.

•

The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired, and is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. For collateral dependent loans, an updated appraisal will be ordered if a current one is not on file. Appraisals are performed by independent third-party appraisers with relevant industry experience. Adjustments to the appraised value may be made based on recent sales of like properties or general market conditions among other considerations.

The general component relates to loans that are not considered impaired. These unimpaired loans are segregated by loan segment and allowance factors are assigned by management based on a three-year loss history, delinquencies, national and local economic trends, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of

management, concentrations of credit, quality of the loan review system and the effect of external factors such as competition and regulatory requirements. The factors assigned differ by loan segment. The general component acknowledges potential losses whose impact on the portfolio has yet to be recognized by a specific allowance. Allowance factors and the overall size of the allowance may change from period to period based on management’s assessment of the above described factors and the relative weights given to each factor.

Lending Policies

General

The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Bank’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on prevailing economic conditions. The risk associated with real estate mortgage loans, commercial and consumer loans varies, based on economic conditions, fluctuations in the value of real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of borrowers to repay indebtedness. The risk associated with real estate construction loans varies, based on the supply and demand for the type of real estate under construction.

In an effort to manage risk, the Bank’s loan policy gives loan amount approval limits to individual loan officers based on their position within the Bank and level of experience. The Management Loan Committee can approve new loans up to their authority. The Board Loan Committee approves all loans which exceed the authority of the Management Loan Committee. The full Board of Directors must approve loans which exceed the authority of the Board Loan Committee, up to the Bank’s legal lending limit. The Board Loan Committee currently consists of five non-management directors. The Board Loan Committee approves the Bank’s Loan Policy and reviews the loan watch list, concentrations of credit and other risk management reports. The Board Loan Committee meets on a monthly basis and the Chairman of the Committee then reports to the Board of Directors.

Residential loan originations are primarily generated by Bank loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals and customers. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through direct solicitation and additional business from existing customers. All completed loan applications are reviewed by the Bank’s loan officers. As part of the application process, information is obtained concerning the income, financial condition, employment and credit history of the applicant. Loan quality is analyzed based on the Bank’s experience and credit underwriting guidelines as well as the guidelines issued by the purchasers of loans, depending on the type of loan involved. Real estate collateral is appraised by independent appraisers who have been pre-approved by the Board Loan Committee.

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, certain appraisals are analyzed by management or by an outsourced appraisal review specialist throughout the year. This is performed to ensure reasonableness of collateral valuations. The Company also obtains an independent review of the loan portfolio on an annual basis to analyze loan risk ratings and validate specific reserves on impaired loans.

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities that are disclosed but not reflected in its financial statements, including commitments to extend credit. At March 31, 2012, commitments to extend credit, stand-by letters of credit and rate lock commitments totaled $64.5 million.

Commercial Business Lending

Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than loans secured by real estate, but typically have higher yields. Commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much reliability as residential real estate. To manage these risks, the Bank generally obtains appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners and monitors the financial condition of its business borrowers.

Commercial Real Estate Lending

Commercial real estate loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate typically in the Bank’s market area, including multi-family residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, hotels, small shopping centers, farms and churches. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through direct solicitation of developers and additional business from existing customers. In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank may lend, under federal regulation,

up to 85% of the secured property’s appraised value, although the Bank’s loan to original appraised value ratio on such properties is typically 80% or less. The valuation of commercial real estate collateral is provided by independent appraisers who have been approved by the Board Loan Committee. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economy, in general. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower’s creditworthiness, prior credit history and reputation. The Bank typically requires personal guarantees of the borrowers’ principal owners and considers the valuation of the real estate collateral.

Construction and Land Development Lending

The Bank makes local construction loans, including residential and land acquisition and development loans. These loans are secured by the property under construction and the underlying land for which the loan was obtained. The majority of these loans have an average life of approximately one year and re-price monthly as key rates change. Construction lending entails significant additional risks, compared with residential mortgage lending. Construction loans sometimes involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Another risk involved in construction lending is the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of the land or property under construction, which value is estimated based on the completion of construction. Thus, there is risk associated with failure to complete construction and potential cost overruns. To mitigate the risks associated with construction lending, the Bank generally limits loan amounts to 80% of appraised value, in addition to analyzing the creditworthiness of its borrowers. The Bank typically obtains a first lien on the property as security for its construction loans, typically requires personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners, and monitors the progress of the construction project during the draw period.

Residential Real Estate Lending

Residential lending activity may be generated by Bank loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals and existing or new bank customers. Loan applications are taken by a Bank loan officer. As part of the application process, information is gathered concerning income, employment and credit history of the applicant. Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from employment and other income and are secured by real estate whose value tends to be readily ascertainable. In addition to the Bank’s underwriting standards, loan quality may be analyzed based on guidelines issued by a secondary market investor. The valuation of residential collateral is generally provided by independent fee appraisers who have been approved by the Board Loan Committee. In addition to originating fixed rate mortgage loans with the intent to sell to correspondent lenders or broker to wholesale lenders, the Bank originates balloon and other mortgage loans for the portfolio. Depending on the financial goals of the Company, the Bank occasionally originates and retains these loans.

Consumer Lending

The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans and installment and demand loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on a proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Results of Operations

General

Net interest income represents the primary source of earnings for the Company. Net interest income equals the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets, predominantly loans and securities, exceeds interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits, other borrowings and trust preferred securities. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, are the components that impact the level of net interest income. The net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by average earning assets. The provision for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense are the other components that determine net income. Noninterest income and expense primarily consists of income from service charges on deposit accounts; fees charged for other customer services, including trust and investment advisory services; gains and losses from the sale of assets, including loans held for sale, securities and premises and equipment; general and administrative expenses; other real estate owned expenses and income tax expense.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, net income totaled $475 thousand compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2011. After the effective dividend on preferred stock, net income available to common shareholders was $251 thousand, or $0.08 per basic and diluted share, compared to $780 thousand, or $0.26 per basic and diluted share, for the same period in 2011. First quarter 2012 results reflect total provisions for loan losses and other real estate owned of $2.4 million, compared to $400 thousand for the first quarter of 2011. Net interest income was 3% higher than for the first quarter of 2011 and noninterest income was 4% higher than for the first quarter of 2011, excluding gains on the sale of securities. Noninterest expense was 4% higher when comparing the two periods, excluding the provision for other real estate owned and net gains on sale of other real estate owned. Return on assets and return on equity were 0.36% and 5.17%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2012 compared to 0.74% and 8.31% for the same quarter in 2011.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income totaled $5.1 million for the first quarter of 2012, which was a 3%, or $145 thousand, increase when comparing the first quarter of 2012 to the same period a year ago. The net interest margin increased to 4.14% from 3.89%, which was partially offset by a 4% decrease in average earning assets. The margin improvement was attributed to lower cost of funds and interest income adjustments on non-accrual loans.

Provision for Loan Losses

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses provides prudent coverage of the risks in the loan portfolio. However, we expect that additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary in the future, the amount of which will be influenced by changes in the Bank’s loan customers’ ability to pay which is affected by real estate values, economic conditions, and other factors.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income totaled $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2012, which was $1.2 million higher when compared to the same quarter of 2011. The increase in noninterest income was primarily the result of gains on sales of securities totaling $1.1 million during the quarter. Noninterest income, excluding gains on sale of securities, totaled $1.4 million for the first quarter of 2012, which was 4% higher compared to the same quarter of 2011. The increase in noninterest income, excluding securities gains, resulted from higher revenue from fees for other customer services, including loan fees. Performance from other noninterest income categories, such as service charges on deposit accounts, ATM and check card income, and trust and investment advisory revenue, was consistent when comparing the periods.

Noninterest income, excluding gains on sales of securities, is not expected to change significantly for 2012, when compared to first quarter results.

Noninterest Expense

The Company does not expect a significant change in noninterest expense for the remainder of 2012, excluding the provision for OREO and gains and losses on sale of OREO, when compared to first quarter results. Management believes that the carrying value of other real estate owned reflects current market conditions and the Bank’s disposition plans. However, the amount of the provision for other real estate owned and gains or losses that may occur from the sale of other real estate owned may be impacted by changes in real estate values.

Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax provision differed from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The difference was a result of net permanent tax deductions, primarily comprised of tax-exempt interest income. A more detailed discussion of the Company’s tax calculation is contained in Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Financial Condition

General

Total assets were $534.2 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $539.1 million at December 31, 2011. The Company’s trust and investment advisory group had assets under management of $230.6 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $217.2 million at December 31, 2011. Assets managed by the trust and investment advisory group are not held on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Company is anticipating economic conditions to remain stable in the local market, which should result in stable loan and deposit balances during 2012.

Loans

The Company, through its banking subsidiary, grants mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to customers. The bank segments its loan portfolio into real estate loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans. Real estate loans are further divided into the following classes: Construction; 1-4 family residential; and Other Real Estate Loans. Descriptions of the Company’s loan classes are as follows:

Commercial Loans: Commercial loans are typically secured with non-real estate commercial property. The Company makes commercial loans primarily to businesses located within our market area.

Real Estate Loans – Construction and Land Development: The Company originates construction loans for the acquisition and development of land and construction of condominiums, townhomes, and one-to-four family residences.

Real Estate Loans – 1-4 Family: This class of loans includes loans secured by one to four family homes. Typically, the Bank originates fixed rate mortgage loans with the intent to sell to correspondent lenders. Depending on the financial goals of the Company, the Bank occasionally originates and retains these loans.

Real Estate Loans – Other: This loan class consists primarily of loans secured by various types of commercial real estate typically in the Bank’s market area, including multi-family residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, hotels, small shopping centers, farms and churches.

Consumer Loans: Consumer loans include all loans made to individuals for consumer or personal purposes. They include new and used automobile loans, unsecured loans and lines of credit.

A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by residential and commercial loans secured by real estate throughout the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. The ability of the Bank’s debtors to honor their contracts is subject to the real estate and general economic conditions in this area.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances less the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued and credited to income based on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

A loan’s past due status is based on the contractual due date of the most delinquent payment due. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when the collection of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due, or earlier, if collection is uncertain based on an evaluation of the net realizable value of the collateral and the financial strength of the borrower. Loans greater than 90 days past due may remain on accrual status if management determines it has adequate collateral to cover the principal and interest. For those loans that are carried on non-accrual status, payments are first applied to principal outstanding. A loan may be returned to accrual status if the borrower has demonstrated a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan and there is reasonable assurance the borrower will continue to make payments as agreed. These policies are applied consistently across the loan portfolio.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Any unsecured loan that is over 120 days past due is charged-off in full. Any secured loan that is 120 days delinquent and is considered by management to be uncollectible is partially charged-off and carried at the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. This charge-off policy applies to all loan segments.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value (net of selling costs), and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Additionally, management’s policy is to evaluate substandard loans greater than $500 thousand and all doubtful loans for impairment. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair market value of the collateral, net of selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer, residential and certain small commercial loans that are less than $500 thousand for impairment disclosures, except for troubled debt restructurings as noted below.

In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial condition, management may grant a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a TDR. TDRs are considered impaired loans. Upon designation as a TDR, the Company evaluates the borrower’s payment history, past due status and ability to make payments based on the revised terms of the loan. If a loan was accruing prior to being modified as a TDR and if the Company concludes that the borrower is able to make such payments, and there are no other factors or circumstances that would cause it to conclude otherwise, the loan will remain on an accruing status. If a loan was on non-accrual status at the time of the TDR, the loan will remain on non-accrual status following the modification and may be returned to accrual status based on the policy for returning loans to accrual status as noted above.

Asset Quality

Management classifies as non-performing assets non-accrual loans and other real estate owned (OREO). OREO represents real property taken by the Bank either through foreclosure or through a deed in lieu thereof from the borrower. OREO is recorded at the lower of cost or market, less estimated selling costs, and is actively marketed by the Bank through brokerage channels. The Bank had $5.6 million in OREO, net of the valuation allowance, at March 31, 2012 and $6.4 million at December 31, 2011. The valuation allowance for other real estate owned totaled $2.5 million at March 31, 2012 and $2.8 million at December 31, 2011.

Non-performing assets were $15.9 million at March 31, 2012, $18.2 million at December 31, 2011 and $16.4 million at March 31, 2011, representing 2.98%, 3.38% and 2.94% of total assets, respectively. Non-performing assets included $10.3 million in non-accrual loans and $5.6 million in OREO, net of the valuation allowance at March 31, 2012.

The levels of non-performing assets in 2012 and 2011 were primarily attributable to weaker local economic conditions that negatively impacted the ability of certain borrowers to service debt. Borrowers that have not been able to meet their debt requirements are primarily business customers involved in hotel and mini-storage operations, commercial and residential rental real estate and residential real estate development. At March 31, 2012, 53% of non-performing assets related to commercial real estate loans, 25% related to construction and land development loans, 21% related to residential real estate loans and 1% related to commercial and industrial loans not secured by real estate. Non-performing assets could increase due to other potential problem loans identified by management. Other potential problem loans are defined as performing loans that possess certain risks, including the borrower’s ability to pay and the collateral value securing the loan, that management has identified that may result in the loans not being repaid in accordance with their terms. Other potential problem loans totaled $48.3 million and $45.1 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The amount of other potential problem loans in future periods will be dependent on economic conditions.

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s analysis of the existing loan portfolio and related credit risks. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s current estimate of the amount required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses reflective of the risks in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $13.6 million at March 31, 2012 and $12.9 million at December 31, 2011, representing 3.49% and 3.30% of total loans, respectively. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was primarily attributable to higher net charge-off history and more specific reserves on impaired loans.

Impaired loans totaled $21.6 million and $25.9 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The related allowance for loan losses provided for these loans totaled $2.8 million and $2.4 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was $21.4 million and $38.2 million, respectively. Included in the impaired loans total at March 31, 2012 are loans classified as TDRs totaling $5.4 million. These loans represent situations in which a modification to the contractual interest rate or repayment structure has been granted to address a financial hardship. As of March 31, 2012, $1.4 million of these TDRs were performing under the restructured terms and were not considered non-performing assets.

Management believes, based upon its review and analysis, that the Bank has sufficient reserves to cover losses inherent within the loan portfolio. For each period presented, the provision for loan losses charged to expense was based on management’s judgment after taking into consideration all factors connected with the collectability of the existing portfolio. Management considers economic conditions, historical loss factors, past due percentages, internally generated loan quality reports and other relevant factors when evaluating the loan portfolio. There can be no assurance, however, that an additional provision for loan losses will not be required in the future, including as a result of changes in the economic assumptions underlying management’s estimates and judgments, adverse developments in the economy, on a national basis or in the Company’s market area, or changes in the circumstances of particular borrowers. For further discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses, see “Critical Accounting Policies” above.

Securities

Securities at March 31, 2012 were $84.6 million, a decrease of $7.0 million, or 8%, from $91.7 million at December 31, 2011. Investment securities are comprised of U.S. agency and mortgage-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate equity securities. As of March 31, 2012, neither the Company nor the Bank held any derivative financial instruments in its respective investment security portfolios. Gross unrealized losses totaled $114 thousand and $16 thousand at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Investments in an unrealized loss position were considered temporarily impaired at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Deposits

Deposits were $464.6 million at March 31, 2012, a decrease of 1% from $469.2 million at December 31, 2011. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $3.3 million or 4% to $85.0 million during the first three months of 2012 from $81.7 million at December 31, 2011. Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits increased $6.5 million or 3% to $204.7 at March 31, 2012 compared to $198.2 million at December 31, 2011. Time deposits, which include brokered deposits, decreased $14.4 million or 8% during the first three months of 2012 to $174.9 million compared to $189.3 million at December 31, 2011.

Liquidity

Liquidity represents the ability to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or with borrowings from correspondent banks or other deposit markets. The Company classifies cash, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, investment securities and loans maturing within one year as liquid assets. As a result of the Bank’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Bank maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and to meet its customers’ borrowing needs. As part of the Bank’s liquidity risk management, stress tests and cash flow modeling are performed quarterly.

At March 31, 2012, cash, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, securities and loans maturing within one year totaled $127.4 million. At March 31, 2012, 25% or $98.4 million of the loan portfolio would mature within one year. Non-deposit sources of available funds totaled $94.0 million at March 31, 2012, which included $56.3 million available from FHLB, $32.0 million of unsecured federal funds lines of credit with other correspondent banks and $5.7 million available through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. During the first three months of 2012, other borrowing activity included repayment of a fixed rate advance from FHLB totaling $5.0 million.

Capital Resources

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s asset and liability levels and consistent with regulatory requirements and industry standards. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and absorb potential losses.

In order to maintain solid capital levels in light of the current economic environment, the Company’s Board of Directors determined in July 2011 to suspend cash dividends on the Company’s common stock.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has adopted capital guidelines to supplement the existing definitions of capital for regulatory purposes and to establish minimum capital standards. Specifically, the guidelines categorize assets and off-balance sheet items into four risk-weighted categories. The minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets is 8.00%, of which at least 4.00% must be Tier 1 capital, composed of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of perpetual preferred stock, less certain goodwill items. The Company had a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 12.74% at March 31, 2012 and a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 11.46%. Both of these exceed the capital requirements adopted by the federal regulatory agencies.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the contractual obligations disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company, through the Bank, is a party to credit related financial instruments with risk not reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Bank follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit, which amounted to $54.2 million at March 31, 2012, and $48.9 million at December 31, 2011, are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines of credit are collateralized as deemed necessary and might not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Bank is committed.

Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially all letters of credit issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank generally holds collateral supporting those commitments if deemed necessary. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Bank had $7.8 million and $9.8 million in outstanding standby letters of credit, respectively.

The Company had $2.5 million in locked-rate commitments to originate mortgage loans at March 31, 2012 and $4.0 million at December 31, 2011. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, the aforementioned officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company’s management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of it that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business, to which the Company is a party or to which the property of the Company is subject.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There were no material changes to the Company’s risk factors as disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

None

Item 5.

Other Information

None

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following documents are attached hereto as Exhibits:


3.1		Bylaws, as restated in electronic format only as of April 11, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 13, 2012).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Section 302 Certification

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Section 302 Certification

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

101		The following materials from First National Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)

/s/ Scott C. Harvard				May 15, 2012
Scott C. Harvard				Date
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ M. Shane Bell				May 15, 2012
M. Shane Bell				Date
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Number		Document

3.1		Bylaws, as restated in electronic format only as of April 11, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 13, 2012).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Section 302 Certification

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Section 302 Certification

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

101		The following materials from First National Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.