esco10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
(X)
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
|
OR
( )
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______ TO ______
|
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-10596
|
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MISSOURI
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
43-1554045
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
9900A CLAYTON ROAD
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
63124-1186
(Zip Code)
|
(314) 213-7200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No _____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes X No _____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer ____
Non-accelerated filer ____ Smaller reporting company ____
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes No X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 |
Common stock, $.01 par value per share |
|
26,605,353 shares |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
166,748 |
|
|
|
129,281 |
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
98,594 |
|
|
|
79,399 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
43,409 |
|
|
|
36,809 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
2,887 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
145,701 |
|
|
|
120,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
9,143 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
13,227 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic – Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted – Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Six Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
326,684 |
|
|
|
241,986 |
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
196,077 |
|
|
|
146,835 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
87,054 |
|
|
|
76,017 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
5,888 |
|
|
|
5,771 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
1,311 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
289,838 |
|
|
|
232,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
36,846 |
|
|
|
9,815 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
24,040 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic – Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted – Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
|
|
26,508 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
137,792 |
|
|
|
141,098 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts, less progress billings of $8,784 and $12,189, respectively
|
|
|
10,080 |
|
|
|
12,743 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
94,697 |
|
|
|
83,034 |
|
Current portion of deferred tax assets
|
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
17,592 |
|
|
|
17,169 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
308,997 |
|
|
|
296,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
72,965 |
|
|
|
72,563 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
360,950 |
|
|
|
355,656 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
231,941 |
|
|
|
229,736 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,473 |
|
|
|
19,975 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
994,326 |
|
|
|
974,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
51,508 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
47,715 |
|
|
|
59,088 |
|
Advance payments on long-term contracts, less costs incurred of $18,482 and $19,547, respectively
|
|
|
23,589 |
|
|
|
5,729 |
|
Accrued salaries
|
|
|
20,050 |
|
|
|
23,762 |
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
23,857 |
|
|
|
21,907 |
|
Accrued other expenses
|
|
|
31,323 |
|
|
|
26,494 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
198,042 |
|
|
|
186,980 |
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
27,234 |
|
|
|
29,980 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
78,925 |
|
|
|
79,388 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
18,713 |
|
|
|
17,961 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
414,914 |
|
|
|
418,309 |
|
Shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 10,000,000 shares
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 50,000,000 shares, issued 29,930,279 and 29,839,343 shares, respectively
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
273,125 |
|
|
|
270,943 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
379,067 |
|
|
|
359,274 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(13,502 |
) |
|
|
(14,793 |
) |
|
|
|
638,989 |
|
|
|
615,722 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost: 3,328,926 and 3,338,986 common shares, respectively
|
|
|
(59,577 |
) |
|
|
(59,740 |
) |
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
579,412 |
|
|
|
555,982 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
994,326 |
|
|
|
974,291 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Six Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
24,040 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,333 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Changes in current assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
(15,158 |
) |
Effect of deferred taxes
|
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Change in deferred revenue and costs, net
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Pension contributions
|
|
|
(4,010 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
627 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
35,967 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(3,732 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Additions to capitalized software
|
|
|
(7,867 |
) |
|
|
(4,095 |
) |
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5,636 |
) |
|
|
(7,074 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(17,235 |
) |
|
|
(11,169 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(33,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,104 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(4,247 |
) |
|
|
(2,115 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(13,790 |
) |
|
|
(11,152 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
(2,225 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
(21,705 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
26,508 |
|
|
|
44,630 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
|
|
22,925 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all the disclosures required for annual financial statements by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
The Company’s business is typically not impacted by seasonality; however, the results for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire 2011 fiscal year. References to the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 represent the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
In preparing the financial statements, the Company uses estimates and assumptions that may affect reported amounts and disclosures. The Company regularly evaluates the estimates and assumptions related to the allowance for doubtful trade receivables, inventory obsolescence, warranty reserves, value of equity-based awards, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, asset impairments, employee benefit plan liabilities, income tax liabilities and assets and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, and litigation and other loss contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
On February 28, 2011, the Company acquired the capital stock of EMV Elektronische Messgerate Vertriebs – Gmbh, together with its subsidiary EMSCREEN Electromagnetic Screening Gmbh (collectively, EMV) for a purchase price of approximately $5.0 million, inclusive of cash acquired. EMV, with operations in Taufkirchen, Germany provides turnkey systems and shielded environments for research, development and quality assurance testing of electronic equipment. EMV’s operating results, since the date of acquisition, are included within the Test segment and the Company recorded approximately $4.8 million of goodwill as a result of the transaction.
|
3.
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
|
Basic EPS is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of dilutive common share options and vesting of performance-accelerated restricted shares (restricted shares) by using the treasury stock method. The number of shares used in the calculation of earnings per share for each period presented is as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
Weighted Average Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - Basic |
26,583 |
26,440 |
|
26,562 |
26,432 |
Dilutive Options and Restricted Shares
|
300
|
262
|
|
285
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Shares - Diluted
|
26,883
|
26,702
|
|
26,847
|
26,705
|
Options to purchase 255,462 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $37.54 - $54.88 and options to purchase 573,394 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $32.55 - $54.88 were outstanding during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares. The options expire at various periods through 2014. Approximately 210,000 and 248,000 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, based upon the application of the treasury stock method.
4.
|
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
|
The Company provides compensation benefits to certain key employees under several share-based plans providing for employee stock options and/or performance-accelerated restricted shares (restricted shares), and to non-employee directors under a non-employee directors compensation plan.
Stock Option Plans
The fair value of each option award is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock calculated over the expected term of the option. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. The expected dividend yield is based on historical dividend rates. There were no stock option grants during the first six months of fiscal 2011. Pretax compensation expense related to stock option awards was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the respective prior year periods.
Information regarding stock options awarded under the option plans is as follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Avg.
Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
|
|
Weighted Avg. Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2010
|
|
|
761,931 |
|
|
$ |
35.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(64,656 |
) |
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(183,799 |
) |
|
$ |
43.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
513,476 |
|
|
$ |
35.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
474,494 |
|
|
$ |
34.88 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
Performance-accelerated Restricted Share Awards
Pretax compensation expense related to the restricted share awards was $1.0 million and $2.0 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.4 million for the respective prior year periods.
The following summary presents information regarding outstanding restricted share awards as of March 31, 2011 and changes during the six-month period then ended:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Avg. Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at October 1, 2010
|
|
|
304,176 |
|
|
$ |
38.95 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
109,957 |
|
|
$ |
32.86 |
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
414,133 |
|
|
$ |
37.40 |
|
Non-Employee Directors Plan
Pretax compensation expense related to the non-employee director grants was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.1million and $0.3 million for the respective prior year periods.
The total share-based compensation cost that has been recognized in results of operations and included within selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) was $1.3 million and $2.5 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.9 million and $1.9 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2010, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in results of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, there was $7.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
5. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
32,052 |
|
|
|
29,902 |
|
Work in process, including long-term contracts
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
18,743 |
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
40,969 |
|
|
|
34,389 |
|
Total inventories
|
|
$ |
94,697 |
|
|
|
83,034 |
|
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $14.8 million and $4.1 million, respectively. Comprehensive income for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $25.3 million and $4.8 million, respectively. For the six-month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company’s comprehensive income was positively impacted by foreign currency translation adjustments of $1.2 million and interest rate swap gains of $0.1 million. For the six-month period ended March 31, 2010, the Company’s comprehensive income was negatively impacted by foreign currency translation adjustments of $2.2 million and favorably impacted by interest rate swap gains of $0.6 million.
7.
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
The Company is organized based on the products and services that it offers. Under this organizational structure, the Company has three reporting segments: Utility Solutions Group (USG), RF Shielding and Test (Test) and Filtration/Fluid Flow (Filtration). The USG segment’s operations consist of: Aclara Power-Line Systems Inc. (Aclara PLS), Aclara RF Systems Inc. (Aclara RF), Aclara Software Inc., and Doble Engineering Company (Doble). The Aclara Group is a proven supplier of special purpose fixed-network communications systems for electric, gas and water utilities, including hardware and software to support advanced metering applications. Doble provides high-end, intelligent diagnostic test solutions for the electric power delivery industry and is a leading supplier of partial discharge testing instruments used to assess the integrity of high voltage power delivery equipment. Test segment operations represent the EMC Group, consisting primarily of ETS-Lindgren L.P. (ETS) and Lindgren R.F. Enclosures, Inc. (Lindgren). The EMC Group is an industry leader in providing its customers with the ability to identify, measure and contain magnetic, electromagnetic and acoustic energy. The Filtration segment’s operations consist of: PTI Technologies Inc. (PTI), VACCO Industries (VACCO), Crissair, Inc. (Crissair) and TekPackaging LLC (TekPackaging). The companies within this segment primarily design and manufacture specialty filtration products, including hydraulic filter elements used in commercial aerospace applications, unique filter mechanisms used in micro-propulsion devices for satellites and custom designed filters for manned and unmanned aircraft.
Management evaluates and measures the performance of its operating segments based on “Net Sales” and “EBIT”, which are detailed in the table below. EBIT is defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest and taxes. The table below is presented on the basis of continuing operations and excludes discontinued operations.
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
USG
|
|
$ |
84,992 |
|
|
|
72,009 |
|
|
$ |
177,182 |
|
|
|
133,232 |
|
Test
|
|
|
42,103 |
|
|
|
31,580 |
|
|
|
74,106 |
|
|
|
58,567 |
|
Filtration
|
|
|
39,653 |
|
|
|
25,692 |
|
|
|
75,396 |
|
|
|
50,187 |
|
Consolidated totals
|
|
$ |
166,748 |
|
|
|
129,281 |
|
|
$ |
326,684 |
|
|
|
241,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USG
|
|
$ |
15,814 |
|
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
$ |
31,169 |
|
|
|
15,191 |
|
Test
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
Filtration
|
|
|
6,534 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
12,009 |
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
Corporate (loss)
|
|
|
(5,977 |
) |
|
|
(5,808 |
) |
|
|
(12,143 |
) |
|
|
(11,282 |
) |
Consolidated EBIT
|
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
9,898 |
|
|
|
38,158 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
Less: Interest expense
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$ |
21,047 |
|
|
|
9,143 |
|
|
$ |
36,846 |
|
|
|
9,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. DEBT
The Company’s debt is summarized as follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Revolving credit facility, including current portion
|
|
$ |
143,508 |
|
|
|
154,000 |
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(51,508 |
) |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
Total long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
$ |
92,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
At March 31, 2011, the Company had approximately $173.8 million available to borrow under the credit facility, and a $50 million increase option, in addition to $32.6 million cash on hand. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $142 million of outstanding borrowings under the credit facility and outstanding letters of credit of $14.2 million. The Company classified $50 million as the current portion of long-term debt as of March 31, 2011, as the Company intends to repay this amount within the next twelve months; however, the Company has no contractual obligation to repay such amount during the next twelve months. The Company also had $1.5 million of short-term borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2011. The Company’s ability to access the additional $50 million increase option of the credit facility is subject to acceptance by participating or other outside banks.
The credit facility requires, as determined by certain financial ratios, a facility fee ranging from 15 to 25 basis points per year on the unused portion. The terms of the facility provide that interest on borrowings may be calculated at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or based on the prime rate, at the Company’s election. The facility is secured by the unlimited guaranty of the Company’s material domestic subsidiaries and a 65% pledge of the material foreign subsidiaries’ share equity. The financial covenants of the credit facility also include a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio.
9. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The second quarter 2011 effective income tax rate was 37.2% compared to 34.7% in the second quarter of 2010. The effective income tax rate in the first six months of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was 34.8%. The income tax expense in the first six months of 2011 was favorably impacted by net research tax credits of $0.4 million, reducing the rate for the first six months of 2011 by 1.2%, as a result of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010. The income tax expense in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 was favorably impacted by a $0.2 million adjustment to foreign tax accruals reducing the prior year quarter and year-to-date effective tax rate by 1.7% and 1.6%, respectively. The Company estimates the annual effective income tax rate for fiscal 2011 will be approximately 36%.
There was no material change in the unrecognized tax benefits of the Company during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011. The Company anticipates a $0.5 million reduction in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations.
10. RETIREMENT PLANS
A summary of net periodic benefit expense for the Company’s defined benefit plans for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the following table. Net periodic benefit cost for each period presented is comprised of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
$ |
1,897 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(2,086 |
) |
|
|
(2,070 |
) |
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
11. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Market risks relating to the Company's operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and selectively uses derivative financial instruments, including forward contracts and swaps, to manage these risks. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a $60 million one-year forward interest rate swap effective October 5, 2010. All derivative instruments are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. The derivative instruments are designated as a cash flow hedge and the gain or loss on the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income until recognized in earnings with the underlying hedged item. Including the impact of interest rate swaps outstanding, the interest rates on approximately 40% of the Company’s total borrowings were effectively fixed as of March 31, 2011.
The following is a summary of the notional transaction amounts and fair values for the Company’s outstanding derivative financial instruments as of March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
Average
Receive
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Pay Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
$ |
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s interest rate swaps are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 825, as presented below as of March 31, 2011:
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion refers to the Company’s results from continuing operations, except where noted. References to the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 represent the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
NET SALES
Net sales increased $37.5 million, or 29.0%, to $166.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $129.3 million in the second quarter of 2010. Net sales increased $84.7 million, or 35.0%, to $326.7 million in the first six months of 2011 from $242.0 million in the prior year period. The increase in net sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year periods is the result of increases in all three business segments: USG, Test and Filtration.
-Utility Solutions Group (USG)
Net sales increased $13.0 million, or 18.0%, to $85.0 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $72.0 million for the second quarter of 2010. Net sales increased $44.0 million, or 33.0%, to $177.2 million for the first six months of 2011 from $133.2 million in the prior year period. The sales increase in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the prior year quarter was mainly due to: a $6.0 million increase in net sales from Aclara RF mainly due to higher AMI product deliveries for the New York City water project and a $5.5 million increase in net sales from Doble due to higher product shipments, mainly due to the F6000 and M4000 products . The sales increase in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year period was due to: a $24.9 million increase in net sales from Aclara PLS primarily due to higher shipments to Mexico’s electric utility Federal Commission of Electricity (CFE); a $9.2 million increase in net sales from Aclara RF; and an $8.5 million increase from Doble, both due to the reasons mentioned above.
-Test
For the second quarter of 2011, net sales of $42.1 million were $10.5 million, or 33.2%, higher than the $31.6 million of net sales recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Net sales increased $15.5 million, or 26.5%, to $74.1 million in the first six months of 2011 from $58.6 million in the first six months of 2010. The sales increase for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year quarter was mainly due to: a $7.1 million increase in net sales from the segment’s U.S. operations primarily driven by higher shipments of shielded enclosures for the U.S. government; and a $3.2 million increase in net sales from the segment’s Asian operations due to a large chamber project in Japan. The sales increase for the first six months of 2011 compared to the prior year period was due to: an $11.3 million increase in net sales from the segment’s U.S operations and $4.6 million increase in net sales from the segment’s Asian operations, both due to the reasons mentioned above.
-Filtration
For the second quarter of 2011, net sales of $39.7 million were $14.0 million, or 54.5%, higher than the $25.7 million of net sales recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Net sales increased $25.2 million to $75.4 million for the first six months of 2011 from $50.2 million for the first six months of 2010. The sales increase during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year quarter was mainly due to: $6.6 million of net sales from Crissair (Crissair was acquired effective July 31, 2010); a $3.2 million increase in net sales from TekPackaging due to higher shipments of its probe cover product; a $3.0 million increase in net sales at VACCO due to higher shipments of Virginia Class submarine products; and a $1.1 million increase in net sales from PTI driven by higher shipments of aerospace assemblies and elements. The sales increase for the first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year period was mainly due to: $12.2 million of net sales from Crissair; a $6.2 million increase in net sales at TekPackaging; a $4.2 million increase in net sales from VACCO; and a $2.5 million increase in net sales at PTI; all due to the reasons mentioned above.
ORDERS AND BACKLOG
Backlog was $386.8 million at March 31, 2011 compared with $360.6 million at September 30, 2010. The Company received new orders totaling $167.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $218.6 million in the prior year second quarter. New orders of $81.5 million were received in the second quarter of 2011 related to USG products, $41.8 million related to Test products, and $43.8 million related to Filtration products. New orders of $141.0 million were received in the second quarter of 2010 related to USG products, $52.2 million related to Test products, and $25.3 million related to Filtration products.
The Company received new orders totaling $352.9 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to $357.0 million in the prior year period. New orders of $183.5 million were received in the first six months of 2011 related to USG products, $90.2 million related to Test products, and $79.2 million related to Filtration products. New orders of $215.3 million were received in the first six months of 2010 related to USG products, $89.3 million related to Test products, and $52.4 million related to Filtration products.
The Company received orders totaling $5.6 million and $12.5 million from PG&E for AMI gas products during the three and six- month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, compared to $19.1 million and $27.7 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, as the project nears completion, total gas project-to-date orders from PG&E for AMI gas products were approximately 4.7 million units, or $264 million.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company announced that Southern California Gas Co. (SoCalGas), a subsidiary of Sempra Energy, had selected Aclara RF and its STAR® Network for negotiation of a definitive agreement for SoCalGas’ AMI project. The Company expects to finalize the definitive agreement with SoCalGas during fiscal 2011.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the second quarter of 2011 were $43.4 million (26.0% of net sales), compared with $36.8 million (28.5% of net sales) for the prior year quarter. For the first six months of 2011, SG&A expenses were $87.1 million (26.6% of net sales) compared with $76.0 million (31.4% of net sales) for the prior year period. SG&A expenses related to Crissair contributed $1.4 million and $2.7 million to the increase in the current quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the respective prior year periods. The remaining increase in SG&A in the current quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the respective prior periods was due to increases in new product development, marketing and engineering expenses at Doble; and an increase in SG&A within the Test segment to support the international marketplace expansion.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Amortization of intangible assets was $3.0 million and $5.9 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, compared to $2.9 million and $5.8 million for the respective prior year periods. Amortization of intangible assets for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 included $1.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of amortization of acquired intangible assets related to recent acquisitions compared to $1.2 million and $2.3 million for the respective prior year periods. The amortization of these acquired intangible assets is included in Corporate’s operating results; see “EBIT – Corporate”. During the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded $1.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of amortization related to Aclara PLS TWACS NG™ software compared to $1.1 million and $2.2 million for the respective prior year periods. The remaining amortization expenses consist of other identifiable intangible assets (primarily software, patents and licenses).
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
Other expenses, net, were $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Other income, net, was $0.5 million compared to other expenses, net, of $1.3 million for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There were no significant components in other expenses, net, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The principal component of other income, net, for the first six months of 2011 included approximately $0.5 million related to the sale of technical drawings to one of VACCO’s customers. The principal component of other expenses, net, for the first six months of 2010 included approximately $0.9 million of severance expenses.
EBIT
The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on EBIT, defined below. EBIT was $21.6 million (12.9% of net sales) for the second quarter of 2011 and $9.9 million (7.7% of net sales) for the second quarter of 2010. For the first six months of 2011, EBIT was $38.2 million (11.7% of net sales) compared with $12.1 million (5.0% of net sales) for the prior year period.
This Form 10-Q contains the financial measure “EBIT”, which is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. EBIT provides investors and Management with an alternative method for assessing the Company’s operating results. The Company defines “EBIT” as earnings from continuing operations before interest and taxes. Management evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on EBIT and believes that EBIT is useful to investors to demonstrate the operational profitability of the Company’s business segments by excluding interest and taxes, which are generally accounted for across the entire Company on a consolidated basis. EBIT is also one of the measures Management uses to determine resource allocations within the Company and incentive compensation. The following table presents a reconciliation of EBIT to net earnings from continuing operations.
(In thousands)
|
Three Months ended
March 31,
|
|
Six Months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Consolidated EBIT
|
|
$ |
21,585 |
|
|
|
9,898 |
|
|
|
38,158 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
Less: Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
Less: Income tax expense
|
|
|
(7,820 |
) |
|
|
(3,177 |
) |
|
|
(12,806 |
) |
|
|
(3,412 |
) |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
13,227 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
24,040 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
-Utility Solutions Group
EBIT in the second quarter of 2011 was $15.8 million (18.6% of net sales) compared to $10.6 million (14.7% of net sales) in the prior year quarter. For the first six months of 2011, EBIT was $31.2 million (17.6% of net sales) compared to $15.2 million (11.4% of net sales) in the prior year period. The $5.2 million increase in EBIT in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the prior year quarter and the $16.0 million increase in EBIT in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year period was primarily driven by the additional sales volumes at Aclara PLS, Aclara RF and Doble mentioned above.
-Test
EBIT in the second quarter of 2011 was $5.2 million (12.4% of net sales) as compared to $2.1 million (6.6% of net sales) in the prior year quarter. For the first six months of 2011, EBIT was $7.1 million (9.6% of net sales) compared to $2.8 million (4.8% of net sales) in the prior year period. EBIT increased $3.1 million and $4.3 million over the prior year quarter and six-month period, respectively, mainly due to the additional sales volumes mentioned above, primarily related to the segment’s U.S. and Asian operations.
-Filtration
EBIT was $6.5 million (16.5% of net sales) and $3.0 million (11.6% of net sales) in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $12.0 million (15.9% of net sales) and $5.3 million (10.7% of net sales) in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. EBIT increased $3.5 million and $6.7 million over the prior year quarter and six-month period, respectively, mainly due to additional sales volumes at VACCO, TekPackaging and PTI mentioned above as well as the EBIT contribution from Crissair.
-Corporate
Corporate costs included in EBIT were $6.0 million and $12.1 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, compared to $5.8 million and $11.3 million for the respective prior year periods. The increase in Corporate costs in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year period was mainly due to an increase in stock-based compensation expense and acquisition transaction costs. In the first six months of 2011, Corporate costs included $2.5 million of pretax stock compensation expense compared to $1.9 million in the prior year period.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET
Interest expense was $0.5 million and $1.3 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011, respectively, and $0.8 million and $2.2 million for the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in interest expense in the second quarter and first six months of 2011 as compared to the prior year periods was due to lower average interest rates and lower average outstanding borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The second quarter 2011 effective income tax rate was 37.2% compared to 34.7% in the second quarter of 2010. The effective income tax rate in the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was 34.8%. The income tax expense in the first six months of 2011 was favorably impacted by net research tax credits of $0.4 million, reducing the rate for the first six months of 2011 by 1.2%, as a result of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010. The income tax expense in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 was favorably impacted by a $0.2 million adjustment to foreign tax accruals reducing the prior year quarter and year-to-date effective tax rate by 1.7% and 1.6%, respectively. The Company estimates the annual effective income tax rate for fiscal 2011 will be approximately 36%.
There was no material change in the unrecognized tax benefits of the Company during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011. The Company anticipates a $0.5 million reduction in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) increased to $111.0 million at March 31, 2011 from $109.4 million at September 30, 2010. Accounts receivable decreased by $3.3 million in the first six months of 2011, primarily due to the USG segment and Filtration segment, both driven by timing of sales and increased cash collections. Inventories increased $11.7 million in the first six months of 2011 due to a $5.6 million increase in the Test segment, a $3.1 million increase in the USG segment, and a $3.0 million increase in the Filtration segment, all to support near term demand. Accounts payable decreased by $11.4 million in the first six months of 2011 mainly related to a $10.9 million decrease in the USG segment due to the timing of payments to suppliers. Advance payments on long-term contracts increased $17.9 million, of which approximately $13.0 million related to advance payments received under VACCO’s Virginia Class submarine contract.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $36.0 million and $2.8 million for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in the first six months of 2011 is mainly due to the increase in net earnings recorded during the period.
Capital expenditures were $5.6 million and $7.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in the first six months of 2011 is mainly due to lower expenditures on manufacturing equipment within the Filtration segment as compared to the prior year period. In addition, the Company incurred expenditures for capitalized software of $7.9 million and $4.1 million in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
During the first six months of 2011, the Company made $4.0 million of contributions to its defined benefit plans.
Credit facility
At March 31, 2011, the Company had approximately $173.8 million available to borrow under the credit facility, and a $50.0 million increase option, in addition to $32.6 million cash on hand. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $142.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the credit facility and outstanding letters of credit of $14.2 million. The Company classified $50.0 million as the current portion of long-term debt as of March 31, 2011, as the Company intends to repay this amount within the next twelve months; however, the Company has no contractual obligation to repay such amount during the next twelve months. Cash flow from operations and borrowings under the Company’s bank credit facility are expected to meet the Company’s capital requirements and operational needs for the foreseeable future. The Company’s ability to access the additional $50 million increase option of the credit facility is subject to acceptance by participating or other outside banks.
Dividends
A dividend of $0.08 per share was paid on January 20, 2011 to stockholders of record as of January 6, 2011, totaling $2.1 million. Subsequent to March 31, 2011, the next quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share, or $2.1 million, was paid on April 20, 2011 to stockholders of record as of April 6, 2011.
OUTLOOK - 2011
Management expects 2011 consolidated revenues and EPS to increase approximately ten to fifteen percent compared to 2010. As a result of the timing of previously communicated USG Smart Grid spending, along with earlier than planned customer deliveries which resulted in higher sales and profits in the first half of fiscal 2011 than originally planned, Management expects third quarter EPS to be lower than second quarter 2011 EPS.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management has evaluated the accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and related notes and believes those policies to be reasonable and appropriate. Certain of these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by Management in selecting appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on historical experience, trends in the industry, information provided by customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. The most significant areas involving Management judgments and estimates may be found in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
OTHER MATTERS
Contingencies
As a normal incident of the business in which the Company is engaged, various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the Company. In the opinion of Management, final judgments, if any, which might be rendered against the Company in connection with such claims, charges and litigation are adequately reserved, covered by insurance, or would not have a material adverse effect on its financial statements.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this report that are not strictly historical are "forward looking" statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the federal securities laws. Forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the timing associated with the recognition of compensation costs related to the Company’s share based compensation arrangements, the success and outcome of negotiations of a contract with SoCalGas, those relating to the estimates or projections made in connection with the Company’s accounting policies, the timing and amount of repayment of debt, the Company’s annual effective tax rate, the reduction in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months, outcome of current claims and litigation, future cash flow, capital requirements and operational needs for the foreseeable future. Investors are cautioned that such statements are only predictions, and speak only as of the date of this report and the Company undertakes no duty to update such statements. The Company's actual results in the future may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties that exist in the Company's operations and business environment, including, but not limited to: the risk factors described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010; the success of negotiations between SoCalGas and the Company; changes in requirements of SoCalGas; SoCalGas’ ability to successfully negotiate appropriate terms and conditions with other subcontractors and project participants; the timing and content of a potential contract with SoCalGas; the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals pertaining to SoCalGas’ project; technical difficulties; the Company’s successful performance of large AMI contracts; impacts resulting from the Japanese earthquake; weakening of economic conditions in served markets; changes in customer demands or customer insolvencies; competition; intellectual property rights; material changes in the costs and worldwide availability of certain electrical components and raw materials necessary for the production of the Company’s products; termination for convenience of customer contracts; timing and magnitude of future contract awards; performance issues with key suppliers, customers and subcontractors; collective bargaining and labor disputes; changes in laws and regulations including changes in accounting standards and taxation requirements; costs relating to environmental matters; litigation uncertainty; and the Company’s successful execution of internal operating plans and integration of newly acquired businesses.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risks relating to the Company's operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and selectively uses derivative financial instruments, including forward contracts and swaps, to manage these risks. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a $60 million one-year forward interest rate swap effective October 5, 2010. All derivative instruments are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. The derivative instruments are designated as a cash flow hedge and the gain or loss on the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income until recognized in earnings with the underlying hedged item.
Including the impact of interest rate swaps outstanding, the interest rates on approximately 40% of the Company’s total borrowings were effectively fixed as of March 31, 2011. The Company has determined that the market risk relating to interest rates with respect to its variable debt that is not hedged is not material. Based on a sensitivity analysis as of March 31, 2011, the Company estimates that if market interest rates averaged one percentage point higher, the effect would be less than 2% of net earnings for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
The following is a summary of the notional transaction amounts and fair values for the Company’s outstanding derivative financial instruments as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
Receive Rate
|
|
|
Average Pay Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
$ |
(256 |
) |
In addition, during the second quarter of 2011, the Company paid a 47.5 basis points spread on its outstanding debt. Refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 for further discussion about market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of Management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, at Exhibit 3(a)
|
3.2
|
Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000, at Exhibit 4(e)
|
3.3
|
Articles of Merger effective July 10, 2000
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2000, at Exhibit 3(c)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
Bylaws, as amended and restated as of July 10, 2000
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, at Exhibit 3.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
Amendment to Bylaws effective as of February 2, 2007
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, at Exhibit 3.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
Amendment to Bylaws effective as of November 9, 2007
|
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12, 2007, at Exhibit 3.1
|
4.1
|
Specimen revised Common Stock Certificate
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, at Exhibit 4.1
|
4.2
|
Credit Agreement dated as of November 30, 2007 among the Registrant, National City Bank and the lenders from time to time parties thereto
|
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007, at Exhibit 4.1
|
4.3
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement listed at 4.2 above, with retroactive effect to November 12, 2009 among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association (successor to National City Bank)
|
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 12, 2010, at Exhibit 4.1
|
10
|
Form of Notice of Award – Performance-Accelerated Restricted Stock under 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, at Exhibit 10
|
*31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer relating to Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer relating to Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
*32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer relating to Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
*101.SCH
|
XBRL Schema Document
|
|
*101.CAL
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
*101.LAB
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
|
|
*101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL – related documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed”.
* Denotes filed or furnished herewith.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
|
|
/s/ Gary E. Muenster
Gary E. Muenster
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(As duly authorized officer and principal accounting and financial officer of the registrant)
|
Dated: May 5, 2011