e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OHIO
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
34-0577130
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH
|
|
44706-2798 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
330.438.3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and small reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
Common Stock, without par value
|
|
96,822,937 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
913,690 |
|
|
$ |
866,616 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
690,999 |
|
|
|
712,002 |
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
222,691 |
|
|
|
154,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
|
133,057 |
|
|
|
123,411 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
13,755 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
84,109 |
|
|
|
17,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,558 |
) |
|
|
(8,429 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
74,509 |
|
|
|
17,358 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
45,854 |
|
|
|
18,793 |
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
28,655 |
|
|
|
(1,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
28,991 |
|
|
|
(5,078 |
) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(5,948 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
28,617 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to The Timken Companys
Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
28,281 |
|
|
$ |
4,513 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
28,617 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Attributable to The Timken
Company Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
709,301 |
|
|
$ |
755,545 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2010 $34,103; 2009 $41,605 |
|
|
489,054 |
|
|
|
411,226 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
689,372 |
|
|
|
671,236 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
60,877 |
|
|
|
61,508 |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
11,624 |
|
|
|
11,758 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
98,763 |
|
|
|
111,287 |
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,058,991 |
|
|
|
2,022,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and EquipmentNet |
|
|
1,302,542 |
|
|
|
1,335,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
221,038 |
|
|
|
221,734 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
129,762 |
|
|
|
132,088 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
236,144 |
|
|
|
248,551 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
39,637 |
|
|
|
46,732 |
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets |
|
|
626,581 |
|
|
|
649,105 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,988,114 |
|
|
$ |
4,006,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
29,958 |
|
|
$ |
26,345 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
221,852 |
|
|
|
156,004 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
161,567 |
|
|
|
142,471 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
163,734 |
|
|
|
189,345 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
14,679 |
|
|
|
17,035 |
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
600,989 |
|
|
|
540,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
471,229 |
|
|
|
469,287 |
|
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
579,449 |
|
|
|
690,889 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
601,419 |
|
|
|
604,250 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
6,091 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
98,928 |
|
|
|
100,375 |
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,757,636 |
|
|
|
1,870,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 200,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2010 97,717,490 shares;
2009 97,034,033 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
|
|
53,064 |
|
|
|
53,064 |
|
Other paid-in capital |
|
|
858,131 |
|
|
|
843,476 |
|
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,422,782 |
|
|
|
1,402,855 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(699,291 |
) |
|
|
(717,113 |
) |
Treasury shares at cost (2010 894,553 shares; 2009 179,963 shares) |
|
|
(23,567 |
) |
|
|
(4,698 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,611,119 |
|
|
|
1,577,584 |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
18,370 |
|
|
|
17,984 |
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
1,629,489 |
|
|
|
1,595,568 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
3,988,114 |
|
|
$ |
4,006,893 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED (USED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
28,617 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
Net (income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
3,643 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(5,948 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
47,748 |
|
|
|
50,148 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
21,659 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
Pension and other postretirement expense |
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
26,938 |
|
Pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments |
|
|
(118,702 |
) |
|
|
(14,720 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(82,134 |
) |
|
|
55,429 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(22,533 |
) |
|
|
59,948 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
60,405 |
|
|
|
(133,863 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
19,994 |
|
|
|
(20,165 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
(14,216 |
) |
|
|
29,738 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
(13,880 |
) |
|
|
33,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(13,981 |
) |
|
|
(32,710 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
(15,075 |
) |
|
|
(29,061 |
) |
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(15,075 |
) |
|
|
(29,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(8,690 |
) |
|
|
(17,424 |
) |
Net proceeds from common share activity |
|
|
8,250 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares net |
|
|
(13,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(2,471 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
Short-term
debt activity net |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities |
|
|
(10,727 |
) |
|
|
(9,742 |
) |
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(6,562 |
) |
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(46,244 |
) |
|
|
(9,272 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
755,545 |
|
|
|
133,383 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
709,301 |
|
|
$ |
124,111 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the
Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all
of the information and notes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Certain amounts in the 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded two adjustments related to its 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
increased by $6,100 (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to the $18,385 goodwill
impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries
segment. In recording this goodwill impairment loss, the Company did not recognize that a portion
of the loss related to two separate subsidiaries in India and South Africa of which the Company
holds less than 100% ownership. In addition, income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes decreased by $3,400, or $0.04 per share, ($2,044 after-tax or $0.02 per share) due to
a correction of an error related to $3,400 of in-process research and development costs that were
recorded in other current assets with the anticipation of being paid for by a third-party.
However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be substantiated through a
contract with a third party. As a result of these errors, the Companys first quarter 2009 results
were overstated by $4,056 (after-tax). Management concluded the effect of these adjustments was
immaterial to the Companys 2008 and first-quarter 2009 financial statements as well as the
full-year 2009 financial statements.
Note 2
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance
that amended the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The implementation of the new accounting guidance related to variable interest entities,
effective January 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
Note 3 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Inventories, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing supplies |
|
$ |
56,187 |
|
|
$ |
53,022 |
|
Work in process and raw materials |
|
|
298,652 |
|
|
|
269,075 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
334,533 |
|
|
|
349,139 |
|
|
|
|
Total Inventories, net |
|
$ |
689,372 |
|
|
$ |
671,236 |
|
|
|
|
An actual valuation of the inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made
only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly,
interim LIFO calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory
levels and costs. Because these calculations are subject to many factors beyond managements
control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end
LIFO inventory valuation. The LIFO reserve at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $243,795
and $237,669, respectively. The Companys recognized an increase in its LIFO reserve of $6,126
during the first quarter of 2010 compared to a decrease in its LIFO
reserve of $11,832 during the
first quarter of 2009.
5
Note 4 Property, Plant and Equipment
The components of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
594,881 |
|
|
$ |
611,670 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
2,825,392 |
|
|
|
2,786,444 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
3,420,273 |
|
|
|
3,398,114 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,117,731 |
) |
|
|
(2,062,886 |
) |
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment net |
|
$ |
1,302,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,228 |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, machinery and equipment included approximately
$110,000 and $104,300, respectively, of capitalized software. Depreciation expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $45,250 and $46,764, respectively. Depreciation expense
on capitalized software for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 was approximately $5,300
and $5,000, respectively.
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Impairment |
|
Other |
|
Ending Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
49,505 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(410 |
) |
|
$ |
49,095 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
162,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
162,302 |
|
Steel |
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,734 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(696 |
) |
|
$ |
221,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.
6
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
The following table displays intangible assets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
subject to
amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
79,139 |
|
|
$ |
15,390 |
|
|
$ |
63,749 |
|
|
$ |
79,139 |
|
|
$ |
14,321 |
|
|
$ |
64,818 |
|
Engineering drawings |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Know-how |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
4,914 |
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
Patents |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
Technology use |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
4,418 |
|
|
|
30,582 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
31,056 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
PMA licenses |
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
6,585 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
Unpatented technology |
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
5,338 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156,210 |
|
|
$ |
43,030 |
|
|
$ |
113,180 |
|
|
$ |
156,353 |
|
|
$ |
40,850 |
|
|
$ |
115,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not
subject to
amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
221,038 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,038 |
|
|
$ |
221,734 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,734 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Industrial license
agreements |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965 |
|
FAA air agency
certificates |
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237,620 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
237,620 |
|
|
$ |
238,319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
238,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
393,830 |
|
|
$ |
43,030 |
|
|
$ |
350,800 |
|
|
$ |
394,672 |
|
|
$ |
40,850 |
|
|
$ |
353,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets was $2,375 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $11,400 for 2010;
$11,000 in 2011; $10,600 in 2012; $8,100 in 2013 and $7,700 in 2014.
Note 6 Financing Arrangements
Short-term debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries with
various banks with interest rates ranging from 1.98% to 4.86% and 1.98% to 5.05%
at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
$ |
29,958 |
|
|
$ |
26,345 |
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
29,958 |
|
|
$ |
26,345 |
|
|
|
|
The lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to
$303,875. At March 31, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $29,958, which reduced the
availability under these facilities to $273,917.
7
Note 6 Financing Arrangements (continued)
The Company has a $100,000 Accounts Receivable Securitization Financing Agreement (Asset
Securitization Agreement), which expires on November 15, 2010. Under the terms of the Asset
Securitization Agreement, which expires on November 15, 2010, the Company sells, on an ongoing
basis, certain domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned
consolidated subsidiary that in turn uses the trade receivables to secure borrowings, which are
funded through a vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term market. Borrowings under
this agreement are limited to certain borrowing base calculations. Any amounts outstanding under
the Asset Securitization Agreement would be reported on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet in
short-term debt. Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization
Agreement as of March 31, 2010, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under
the Asset Securitization Agreement to $97,096. The cost of this credit facility, which is the
commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a financing cost and is included in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Long-term debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through
May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76% |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 15, 2014, with an interest rate of 6.0% |
|
|
249,697 |
|
|
|
249,680 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.22% at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.24% at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.24% at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC,
maturing on July 17, 2010 (1.35% at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
6,120 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC,
guaranteed by The Timken Company, maturing on July 17, 2010 (4.813% at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
3,320 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,071 |
|
|
|
11,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,908 |
|
|
|
486,322 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
14,679 |
|
|
|
17,035 |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
471,229 |
|
|
$ |
469,287 |
|
|
|
|
On September 9, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of $250,000 of fixed-rate 6.0%
unsecured Senior Notes, due in 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes were used for the
repayment of the Companys fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes, which were due to mature on
February 15, 2010.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500,000 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(Senior Credit Facility). At March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its
Senior Credit Facility but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $32,163, which reduced the
availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $467,837. This Senior Credit Facility matures on
July 10, 2012. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial covenants: a
consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum
tangible net worth test. At March 31, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the covenants
under the Senior Credit Facility.
Advanced Green Components, LLC (AGC) is a joint venture of the Company. The Company is the
guarantor of $3,320 of AGCs $9,440 credit facility with US Bank.
8
Note 7 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues
liabilities for warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty
claim experience in accordance with accounting rules relating to contingent liabilities. The
Company records and accounts for its warranty reserve based on specific claim incidents. Should
the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and
reasonably estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are
made quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical experience change.
The following is a rollforward of the warranty accruals for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and the twelve months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
5,420 |
|
|
$ |
13,515 |
|
Expense |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
4,699 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(12,794 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
5,420 |
|
|
|
|
The product warranty accrual at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was included in other
current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Note 8 Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Timken Company Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Invested |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
in the |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,595,568 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
843,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,402,855 |
|
|
$ |
(717,113 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,698 |
) |
|
$ |
17,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
28,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(13,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
(income tax benefit of $8,907) |
|
|
29,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
(net of income tax of $28) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
46,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends $0.09 per share |
|
|
(8,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from compensation |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tender of 714,590 shares to treasury |
|
|
(17,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 683,457 shares from authorized |
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,629,489 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
858,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,422,782 |
|
|
$ |
(699,291 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,567 |
) |
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
|
The total comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $39,688.
9
Note 9 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic
earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable
to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
28,281 |
|
|
$ |
4,513 |
|
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings
allocated to nonvested stock |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations available
to common shareholders for basic earnings per
share and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
28,166 |
|
|
$ |
4,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
96,360,137 |
|
|
|
96,028,860 |
|
Effect of dilutive options |
|
|
340,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding,
assuming dilution of stock options |
|
|
96,700,256 |
|
|
|
96,028,860 |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average
market price of the Companys common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options
outstanding were 2,367,304 and 4,938,146 during the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
10
Note 10 Segment Information
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment
is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts or payments made under the U.S. Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of subsidiaries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
367,489 |
|
|
$ |
300,623 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
205,901 |
|
|
|
224,174 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
92,093 |
|
|
|
109,254 |
|
Steel |
|
|
248,207 |
|
|
|
232,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
913,690 |
|
|
$ |
866,616 |
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
Steel |
|
|
22,120 |
|
|
|
16,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,789 |
|
|
$ |
16,925 |
|
|
|
|
Segment EBIT, as adjusted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
42,454 |
|
|
$ |
(2,345 |
) |
Process Industries |
|
|
26,939 |
|
|
|
43,492 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
12,801 |
|
|
|
18,108 |
|
Steel |
|
|
19,902 |
|
|
|
(7,262 |
) |
|
|
|
Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments |
|
$ |
102,096 |
|
|
$ |
51,993 |
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses |
|
|
(13,779 |
) |
|
|
(12,317 |
) |
Impairment and restructuring |
|
|
(5,525 |
) |
|
|
(13,755 |
) |
Rationalization and integration charges |
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
1,222 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,558 |
) |
|
|
(8,429 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Intersegment adjustments |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
74,509 |
|
|
$ |
17,358 |
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments. These sales are eliminated in
consolidation.
11
Note 11 Impairment and Restructuring Charges
Impairment and restructuring charges by segment were comprised of the following:
For the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
5,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,795 |
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
6,738 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
9,397 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,507 |
|
|
$ |
4,547 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
13,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for
the periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all
amounts in the tables above.
Selling and Administrative Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, the
Company recorded $1,348 and $2,307, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to
this initiative to eliminate approximately 25 employees and 26 employees, respectively. Of the
$1,348 charge recorded during the first quarter of 2010, $570 related
to Corporate, $375 related to
the Process Industries Segment, $292 related to the Mobile Industries
segment, $90 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $21
related to the Steel segment. Of the $2,307
charge recorded during the first quarter of 2009, $1,200 related to
Corporate, $472 related to the
Mobile Industries segment, $446 related to the Steel segment, $180 related to the Process
Industries segment and $9 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $3,319 in severance and related benefit
costs to eliminate approximately 60 associates to properly align its business as a result of the
continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the $3,319 charge, $1,627 related
to the Mobile Industries segment, $1,152 related to the Process Industries segment and $540 related
to the Aerospace and Defense segment. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded
$6,515 in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits of
$1,850, to eliminate approximately 800 associates to properly align its business as a result of the
continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the $6,515 charge, $5,709 related
to the Mobile Industries segment, $761 related to the Process Industries segment and $45 related to
the Aerospace and Defense segment.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo,
Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this facility on March 31, 2010. The Company expects
to incur pretax costs of approximately $25,000 to $30,000, which includes restructuring costs and
rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general
expenses. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $25,292 as of
March 31, 2010 related to this closure. During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, the Company
recorded $312 and $557, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs associated with the
closure of this facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $769 during the first
quarter of 2009 related to impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in France as a
result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows.
12
Note 11 Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize the Companys three bearing plants in
Canton, Ohio within the Process Industries segment. The Company expects to incur pretax costs of
approximately $70,000 to $80,000 (including pretax cash costs of approximately $50,000), by the
middle of 2010.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $3,026 and exit costs
of $562 as a result of Process Industries rationalization plans. Including rationalization costs
recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses, the Process
Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of
approximately $69,761 as of March 31,
2010 for these rationalization plans.
The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
33,967 |
|
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
Expense |
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
55,598 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
(38,652 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
25,023 |
|
|
$ |
33,967 |
|
|
|
|
The restructuring accrual at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is included in other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The accrual at March 31, 2010 includes $18,578 of
severance and related benefits, with the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs.
The majority of the $18,578 accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be
paid by the end of 2010.
Note 12 Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement and
postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are based on
actuarial calculations prepared during 2009. Consistent with prior years, these calculations will
be updated later in the year. These updated calculations may result in different net periodic
benefit cost for 2010. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three months ended March 31,
2010 is the Companys best estimate of the periods proportionate share of the amounts to be
recorded for the year ending December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9,525 |
|
|
$ |
8,622 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
39,749 |
|
|
|
39,409 |
|
|
|
9,144 |
|
|
|
10,599 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(49,290 |
) |
|
|
(47,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
12,204 |
|
|
|
9,444 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
Pension curtailments and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
14,454 |
|
|
$ |
14,838 |
|
|
$ |
10,750 |
|
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Note 13 Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
45,854 |
|
|
$ |
18,793 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
|
108.3 |
% |
|
|
|
The Companys provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed in accordance with
interim period income tax accounting rules by applying the appropriate annual effective tax rates
to income or loss before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete
items, including interest on prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the period in which
they occur.
The effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2010 was higher than the U.S. federal statutory tax
rate primarily due to a $21,621 charge to income tax expense to record the deferred tax impact of
the recently enacted U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended), losses at
certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded and U.S. state and local taxes.
These increases were partially offset by the earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the
effective tax rate is less than 35%.
The first quarter of 2009 resulted in $18,793 of income tax expense, or an effective tax rate of
108.3%. This tax rate was caused by an application of the interim period accounting rules for
income taxes, as income tax expense on earnings from profitable affiliates exceeded tax benefits
that could be recorded on losses from unprofitable affiliates.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $14,096 adjustment to other comprehensive
income for deferred taxes on postretirement prescription drug benefits, specifically the employer
subsidy provided by the U.S. government under the Medicare Part D program (the Medicare subsidy).
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company determined it had provided deferred taxes on
postretirement benefit plan accruals recorded through other comprehensive income net of the
Medicare subsidy, rather than on a gross basis. The cumulative impact of this error resulted in a
cumulative understatement of deferred tax assets totaling $14,096 and a corresponding
understatement of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Management concluded the effect of the
adjustment was not material to the Companys prior three fiscal years and first quarter 2010
financial statements, as well as the estimated full-year 2010 financial statements.
Note 14 Divestitures
On December 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller
Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT). The Company received approximately $304
million in cash proceeds for these operations and retained certain receivables, subject to
post-sale working capital adjustments. The NRB operations primarily serve the automotive
original-equipment market sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings,
including an extensive range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings bearing assemblies and
loose needles for automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in
the United States, Canada, Europe and China. Results for 2009 for the NRB operations are presented
as discontinued operations.
14
Note 14 Divestitures (continued)
The following results of operations for this business have been treated as discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
93,762 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,250 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,584 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
989 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
|
(Loss) before income taxes on operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,587 |
) |
Income tax benefit on operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,944 |
|
Gain on divestiture |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense on disposal |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
(3,643 |
) |
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, there were no assets or liabilities remaining from the divestiture of the
NRB operations. Working capital adjustments associated with the sale will be finalized during
2010.
15
Note 15 Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). The FASB provides accounting rules that classify the inputs used to measure fair value
into the following hierarchy:
|
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability. |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
11,776 |
|
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
4,490 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses publicly available foreign currency forward and spot rates to measure the fair
value of its foreign currency forward contracts.
The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of risk associated with the
counterparties to its financial instruments.
Financial
Instruments
The
carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
commercial paper, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a
reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The
fair value of the Companys long-term fixed-rate debt, based on
quoted market prices, was $446,060 and $440,090 at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of
this debt was $454,089 and $430,610 at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The
primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk, foreign currency
exchange rate risk, and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on various commodities are entered
into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas used in the
Companys manufacturing process. Forward contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into
to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted revenue denominated in foreign
currencies. Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to
manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of the Companys commitments
denominated in foreign currencies. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate
risk associated with the Companys fixed and floating-rate borrowings.
The Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted
revenues, and certain interest rate hedges as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings. The
majority of the Companys natural gas forward contracts are not subject to any hedge designation as
they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $264,415 of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at
notional value. The total notional value of foreign currency hedges as of December 31, 2009 was
$248,035.
16
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e.,
hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which
the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in
excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if
any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the current period.
To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting
from export sales over the next year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow
hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted intra-group revenue or expense
denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens significantly
against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue
is offset by gains in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely,
when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is
offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the
exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof
that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well
as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in the same line item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in interest expense when the hedged
item is fixed-rate debt).
The following table presents the fair value and location of all assets and liabilities associated
with the Companys hedging instruments within the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
at 3/31/10 |
|
at 12/31/09 |
|
at 3/31/10 |
|
at 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
forward contracts |
|
Other non-current
liabilities |
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
1,849 |
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
1,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
forward contracts |
|
Other non-current
assets/liabilities |
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
$ |
6,949 |
|
|
$ |
4,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,490 |
|
|
$ |
2,651 |
|
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
|
$ |
5,853 |
|
|
17
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the
unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Location of gain or |
|
recognized in income |
Derivatives in fair value |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
on derivative |
hedging relationships |
|
income on derivative |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(706 |
) |
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
Hedged items in |
|
Location of gain or |
|
recognized in income |
fair value hedging |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
on derivative |
relationships |
|
income on derivative |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
Natural gas |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
(loss) reclassified from |
|
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
AOCI into income |
|
|
derivative |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
Derivatives not |
|
Location of gain or |
|
derivative |
designated as |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
March 31, |
hedging instruments |
|
income on derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(2,324 |
) |
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,352 |
) |
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
Introduction
The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and
assemblies, high-quality alloy steels and aerospace power transmission systems as well as a
provider of related products and services. The Company operates under two business groups: the
Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission
Group is composed of three operating segments: (1) Mobile Industries, (2) Process Industries and
(3) Aerospace and Defense. These three operating segments and the Steel Group comprise the
Companys four reportable segments.
The Mobile Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products
and services. Customers of the Mobile Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers
and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, medium and heavy-duty trucks, rail cars,
locomotives and agricultural, construction and mining equipment. Customers also include
aftermarket distributors of automotive products. The Companys strategy for the Mobile Industries
segment is to improve financial performance in the automotive and truck original-equipment markets
while leveraging more attractive markets in the rail and off-highway sectors and in the
aftermarket. This strategy could result in allocating assets to serve the most attractive market
sectors and restructuring or exiting those businesses where adequate returns cannot be achieved
over the long-term.
The Process Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related
products and services. Customers of the Process Industries segment include original equipment
manufacturers of power transmission, energy and heavy industries machinery and equipment including
rolling mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses,
cranes, hoists, drawbridges, wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors
and crushers and food processing equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of
products other than those for steel and automotive applications. The Companys strategy for the
Process Industries segment is to pursue growth in selected industrial market sectors, including the
aftermarket, and to achieve a leadership position in Asia.
The Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor
head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears and other precision flight-critical components
for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace and Defense segment also provides
aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as
well as aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. In addition, the Aerospace and
Defense segment manufactures precision bearings, higher-level assemblies and sensors for equipment
manufacturers of health and positioning control equipment. The Companys strategy for the
Aerospace and Defense segment is to: (1) grow by adding power transmission parts, assemblies and
services, utilizing a platform approach; (2) develop new aftermarket channels; and (3) improve
global capabilities through manufacturing initiatives.
The Steel segment manufactures more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy steel, which are produced
in both solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The Steel segment also
manufactures custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications. The
Companys strategy for the Steel segment is to drive profitable growth by focusing on opportunities
where the Company can offer differentiated capabilities.
In addition to specific segment initiatives, the Company has been making strategic investments in
business processes and systems. Project O.N.E. is a multi-year program launched in 2005 to improve
the Companys business processes and systems. In total, the Company expects to invest up to
approximately $220 million, which includes internal and external costs, to implement Project O.N.E.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has incurred costs of approximately $211.4 million, of which
approximately $124.2 million have been capitalized to the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total
costs incurred were reduced from prior disclosure due to the removal of post-implementation
expenses that were not part of the project. During 2008 and 2007, the Company completed the
installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of the Companys domestic Bearings and Power
Transmission Group operations and a major portion of its European operations. On April 1, 2009,
the Company completed an additional installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of the
Companys remaining European operations as well as certain other facilities in North America and
India. The final installation of Project O.N.E. is expected to be completed in May 2010. With the
completion of the May 2010 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 90% of the Bearings and
Power Transmission Groups global sales will flow through the new system.
On December 31, 2009, the Company completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings
(NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT). The Company received approximately $304 million in
cash proceeds for these operations and retained certain receivables, subject to post-sale working
capital adjustments. The NRB operations manufacture needle roller bearings, including a range of
radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles for
automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations had 2009 sales of approximately $407
million and approximately 80% of these sales were previously included in the Companys Mobile
Industries segment with the remainder included in the Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense
reportable segments. Results for 2009 for the NRB operations are presented as discontinued
operations. The Company incurred an after-tax loss of approximately $12.6 million on the sale of
the NRB operations during the fourth quarter of 2009.
19
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
913.7 |
|
|
$ |
866.6 |
|
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
108.3 |
% |
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
106.8 |
% |
Net income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
NM |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
% |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
NM |
|
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,700,256 |
|
|
|
96,028,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
The Timken Company reported net sales for the first quarter of 2010 of $913.7 million, compared to
$866.6 million in the first quarter of 2009, an increase of 5.4%. Higher sales were driven by
improved demand from automotive markets across the Mobile Industries and Steel segments, as well as
higher surcharges, partially offset by lower sales in the Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense segments. For the first quarter of 2010, net income per diluted share was $0.30 compared
to $0.01 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2009. Income from continuing operations per
diluted share for the first quarter of 2010 was $0.29 compared to $0.05 per diluted share for the
first quarter of 2009.
The Companys first quarter results reflect the improvement in the mobile market sectors, higher
surcharges, improved manufacturing performance and the favorable impact of restructuring
initiatives, partially offset by lower demand from industrial and aerospace markets, higher LIFO
expense and higher expense related to incentive compensation plans. Results for the first
quarter of 2010 also reflect a one-time charge of $21.6 million to record the deferred tax impact
of recently-enacted U.S. health care legislation.
Outlook
The Companys outlook for 2010 reflects a modest improvement in the global economy following the
deteriorating global economic climate that occurred throughout 2009. The Company expects sales in
2010 to be approximately 20% to 25% higher than 2009, primarily driven by stronger sales volume and
higher surcharges in the Steel segment, as well as higher sales from the Mobile and Process
Industries segments, offset by a slight decline in the Aerospace and Defense segment. The Company
expects to leverage increases in sales through improved operating performance and its 2009 cost
reduction initiatives. The strengthening margins will be partially offset by higher expense
related to incentive compensation plans.
The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations in 2010 as a result of higher
earnings in 2010, compared to 2009. In addition, the Company expects to increase capital
expenditures by approximately 20% in 2010 compared to 2009. Pension contributions are also
expected to increase to approximately $135 million in 2010, including over $100 million of
discretionary U.S. contributions, compared to $65 million in 2009.
20
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Segment: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
367.5 |
|
|
$ |
300.6 |
|
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Process Industries |
|
|
205.9 |
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
)% |
Steel |
|
|
248.2 |
|
|
|
232.5 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
913.7 |
|
|
$ |
866.6 |
|
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
Net sales for the first quarter of 2010 increased $47.1 million, or 5.4%, compared to the first
quarter of 2009, primarily due to higher volume of approximately $30 million primarily across the
Mobile Industries light vehicles market sector and the Steel business segment, higher surcharges
of $22 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately $20
million, partially offset by unfavorable pricing and sales mix of approximately $25 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
222.7 |
|
|
$ |
154.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
% |
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
Gross profit margin increased in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009
primarily due to better manufacturing utilization and lower manufacturing costs of approximately
$45 million, the timing of surcharges of approximately $22 million and the impact of higher sales
volume of approximately $10 million, partially offset by higher LIFO expense of $18 million.
In the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold
primarily related to the continued rationalization of Process Industries Canton, Ohio bearing
manufacturing facilities. Rationalization expenses in the first quarter of 2010 primarily
consisted of relocation of equipment. Rationalization expenses in the first quarter of 2009
primarily consisted of accelerated depreciation and relocation of equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Administrative and General Expenses: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
133.1 |
|
|
$ |
123.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in selling,
administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
)% |
|
The increase in selling, administrative and general expenses in the first quarter of 2010, compared
to the first quarter of 2009, was primarily due to higher expense related to incentive compensation
plans of approximately $20 million, partially offset by savings from restructuring initiatives of
approximately $15 million.
21
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and Restructuring Charges: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
Severance and related benefit costs |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Exit costs |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
(8.3 |
) |
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the
periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts
in the tables above. See Note 11 Impairment and Restructuring in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financials for further details by segment.
Selling and Administrative Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company had targeted pretax savings of
approximately $30 million to $40 million in annual selling and administrative costs. In April
2009, in light of the Companys revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and
earnings for the year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80 million. This target
was achieved in 2009. During the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $1.3
million and $2.3 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this
initiative to eliminate approximately 25 associates and 26 associates, respectively. Of the $1.3
million charge recorded during the first quarter of 2010, $0.6 million related to Corporate, $0.4
million related to the Process Industries segment and $0.3 million related to the Mobile Industries
segment. Of the $2.3 million charge recorded during the first quarter of 2009, $1.2 million
related to Corporate, $0.5 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $0.4 million related
to the Steel segment and $0.2 million related to the Process Industries segment. Overall, the
Company has eliminated approximately 500 sales and administrative associates in 2009 and 2010 with
a pretax savings of approximately $55 million.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $3.3 million in severance and related
benefit costs to eliminate approximately 60 associates to properly align its business as a result
of the continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the $3.3 million charge,
$1.6 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.2 million related to the Process
Industries segment and $0.5 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $6.5 million in severance and related benefit costs,
including a curtailment of pension benefits of $1.8 million, to eliminate approximately 800
associates to properly align its business as a result of the continued downturn in the economy and
expected market demand. Of the $6.5 million charge, $5.7 million related to the Mobile Industries
segment and $0.8 million related to the Process Industries segment.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo,
Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this facility on March 31, 2010. This closure is
targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $5 million, with expected pretax costs
of approximately $25 million to $30 million, which includes restructuring costs and rationalization
costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. The
Company expects to realize the $5 million of annual pretax savings by the end of 2010. Mobile
Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $25.3 million as of March 31, 2010
related to this closure. During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $0.3
million and $0.6 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs associated with the
closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.8 million during
the first quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one its facilities in France
as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding their expected future cash flows.
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize the Companys three bearing plants in
Canton, Ohio within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to
deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million through streamlining operations and
workforce reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $70 million to $80 million (including
pretax cash costs of approximately $50 million), by the middle of 2010.
22
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $3.0 million and exit
costs of $0.6 million as a result of Process Industries rationalization plans. Including
rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general
expenses, the Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately
$69.8 million as of March 31, 2010 for these rationalization plans. As of March 31, 2010, the
Process Industries segment has realized approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals: |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Dec. 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
Expense |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is included in other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2009
excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $0.9 million. The accrual at
March 31, 2010 includes $18.8 million of severance and related benefits, with the balance primarily
representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the $18.8 million accrual relating to
severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Income: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
Interest expense for the first quarter of 2010 increased compared to the first quarter of 2009,
primarily due to the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with the refinancing of
the Companys Senior Credit Facility and the issuance of $250 million of fixed-rate 6% unsecured
Senior Notes in the third quarter of 2009 and lower capitalized interest, partially offset by lower
interest expense at non-U.S. affiliates due to lower debt levels. Interest income for the first
quarter of 2010 increased compared to the same period in the prior year, due to higher invested
cash balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expense: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(125.0 |
)% |
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(104.4 |
)% |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(107.5 |
)% |
|
The gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first quarter of 2009 related to the sale
of one of the buildings at the Companys former office complex located in Torrington, Connecticut.
For the first quarter of 2010, other (expense) income primarily consisted of $1.0 million in losses
on the disposal of fixed assets, partially offset by $0.7 million of gains from equity investments.
For the first quarter of 2009, other income (expense) primarily consisted of $6.8 million of
foreign currency exchange gains.
23
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense: |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
|
108.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,680 |
) bps |
|
The decrease in the effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2010, compared to the first quarter
of 2009, was primarily due to decreased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit
could be recorded, utilization of certain foreign net operating losses and increased earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%. These benefits were
partially offset by a $21.6 million charge to income tax expense to record the deferred tax impact
of the recently-enacted U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended), higher U.S.
state and local taxes and reductions in other U.S. tax benefits, including the research and
development credit which expired on December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating results, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gain on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
|
108.3 |
% |
|
In December 2009, the Company completed the divestiture of its NRB operations to JTEKT.
Discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2009 represent the operating results, net of tax,
of these operations. In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recognized an adjustment of $0.3
million on disposal of the NRB operations. Refer to Note 14 Divestitures in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(5.9 |
) |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
106.8 |
% |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was income of $0.4 million for the first
quarter of 2010, compared to a loss of $5.9 million for the first quarter of 2009. In the first
quarter of 2009, net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6.1
million due to a correction of an error related to the $18.4 million goodwill impairment loss the
Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries segment. In recording the
goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company did not recognize that a
portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to two separate subsidiaries in India and South
Africa of which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. As a result, the Companys 2008
financial statements were understated by $6.1 million and the Companys first quarter 2009
financial statements were overstated by $6.1 million. Management concluded the effect of the first
quarter adjustment was not material to the Companys 2008 and first quarter 2009 financial
statements, as well as the full-year 2009 financial statements.
24
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Business Segments:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is
adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets and gains and losses on the dissolution of subsidiaries).
Refer to Note 10 Segment Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by segment to consolidated income before income taxes.
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales for each segment reported in accordance
with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates. The effects
of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate
the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. The presentation
would also remove the effects of acquisitions and divestitures on sales, but there were none in
2010 or 2009 other than the divestiture of the NRB operations, which is already reflected as
discontinued operations. The year 2009 represents the base year for which the effects of currency
are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries Segment: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
367.5 |
|
|
$ |
300.6 |
|
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
42.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
44.8 |
|
|
NM |
|
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Mobile Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
367.5 |
|
|
$ |
300.6 |
|
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
355.8 |
|
|
$ |
300.6 |
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
increased 18.4% for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, primarily due
to higher volume of approximately $55 million. The volume increases were seen across most market
sectors led by a 66% increase in heavy truck, a 37% increase in light vehicles and a 39% increase
from the automotive aftermarket. Adjusted EBIT was higher in the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to higher volume and favorable sales mix of approximately
$35 million and better manufacturing utilization of approximately $15 million.
The Mobile Industries segments sales are expected to increase approximately 10% to 20% percent in
2010, compared to 2009 full-year results, as demand is expected to increase across most of the
Mobile Industries market sectors, led by increases in global light-vehicle demand of approximately
20% and global heavy truck demand of approximately 30%. The Company also expects sales to increase
approximately 20% in its automotive distribution channel during 2010, compared to the full year of
2009. In addition, adjusted EBIT for the Mobile Industries segment is expected to increase
significantly during 2010, compared to 2009, primarily due to higher sales volume.
25
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries Segment: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
206.6 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
|
$ |
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
26.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
$ |
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Process Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
206.6 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
|
$ |
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
198.1 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
|
$ |
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
)% |
|
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 12.0% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $30 million. The lower volume was seen across most
market sectors, led by a 53% decline in cement and aggregate processing equipment demand, a 34%
decline in oil and gas demand and a 31% decline in gear drive demand. In addition, the Companys
industrial distribution channel experienced a 10% decline in demand. These declines were partially
offset by an increase in global wind energy market demand of 25%. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the
first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to the impact of lower
volumes of approximately $15 million. The Company expects sales in the Process Industries segment
to increase approximately 5% for the full year of 2010 compared to 2009, as the industrial
distribution channel strengthens during the second half of 2010. However, the Process Industries
segment expects 2010 adjusted EBIT to be flat compared to the full year of 2009 despite the
increased sales, primarily due to higher raw material costs and higher expense related to incentive
compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense Segment: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
92.1 |
|
|
$ |
109.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(29.3 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Aerospace and Defense segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove currency exchange
rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
92.1 |
|
|
$ |
109.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
91.4 |
|
|
$ |
109.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
)% |
|
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes,
decreased 16.4% in the first quarter of 2010, compared to the first quarter of 2009, primarily due
to a decrease in volume of approximately $20 million. Volume was down across most key market
sectors as the Aerospace and Defense segment continues to experience softening that began in the
middle of the prior year. Profitability for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first
quarter of 2009 declined primarily due to lower volume. The Company expects the Aerospace and
Defense segment to see modest declines in sales and adjusted EBIT in 2010, compared to 2009, as a
result of softer commercial and general aviation market
sectors and flat defense market sectors.
26
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Segment: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
270.3 |
|
|
$ |
248.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.3 |
) |
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
NM |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Steel segment operations reported
in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
270.3 |
|
|
$ |
248.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Currency |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
269.9 |
|
|
$ |
248.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
The Steel segments net sales for the first quarter of 2010, excluding the effect of currency-rate
changes, increased 8.6% compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to higher volume of
approximately $20 million, primarily driven by the automotive market sector, and higher surcharges
in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by unfavorable
sales mix of approximately $20 million. Surcharges increased to $59.5 million in the first quarter
of 2010 from $37.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. Surcharges are a pricing mechanism that
the Company uses to recover scrap steel, energy and certain alloy costs, which are derived from
published monthly indices. The average scrap index for the first quarter of 2010 was $416 per ton
compared to $219 per ton for the first quarter of 2009. Steel shipments for the first quarter of
2010 were 221,187 tons compared to 202,309 tons for the first quarter 2009, an increase of 9.3%.
The Steel segments average selling price, including surcharges, was $1,222 per ton for the first
quarter of 2010 compared to an average selling price of $1,229 per ton in the first quarter of
2009. The decrease in the average selling prices was primarily the result of unfavorable sales
mix, partially offset by higher surcharges. The higher surcharges were the result of higher market
prices for certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, nickel and molybdenum.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT increased $27.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to the timing of surcharges of $22 million, lower
manufacturing costs of approximately $20 million and the impact of higher sales volume of
approximately $10 million, partially offset by the impact of unfavorable sales mix of approximately
$15 million and higher LIFO expense. In the first quarter of 2010, the Steel segment recognized
LIFO expense of $0.3 million compared to LIFO income of $12.4 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys and
energy, increased 24% in the first quarter of 2010 over the comparable period in the prior year to
an average cost of $388 per ton.
The Company expects the Steel segment to see a 60% to 70% increase in sales for the remainder of
2010 due to higher volume and higher surcharges, as scrap steel and alloy prices have risen
substantially from the low levels experienced in 2009. The Company also expects higher demand
across most markets, primarily driven by an 80% increase in industrial market sectors and a 50%
increase in automotive market sectors. The Company expects the Steel segments adjusted EBIT to be
significantly higher in 2010, compared to a loss in 2009, primarily due to the higher sales volume
and surcharges. Scrap costs are expected to increase in the short-term from current levels and
then level off, as are alloy and energy costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate: |
|
|
1Q 2010 |
|
1Q 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Corporate expenses % to net sales |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
bps |
|
Corporate expenses increased for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as a
result of higher expense related to incentive compensation plans, partially offset by the impact of
restructuring initiatives.
27
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The Balance Sheet
Total assets as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2010 decreased by $18.8
million compared to
December 31, 2009. This decrease in 2010 was primarily due to lower cash and cash equivalents and
lower plant, property and equipment, partially offset by higher working capital as a result of
higher volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
709.3 |
|
|
$ |
755.5 |
|
|
$ |
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
489.1 |
|
|
|
411.2 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
Inventories, net |
|
|
689.4 |
|
|
|
671.2 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Other current assets |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
)% |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
2,059.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,022.5 |
|
|
$ |
36.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a discussion of the decrease in cash and cash
equivalents. Accounts receivable, net increased as a result of the higher sales in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Inventories increased primarily due to
higher volume. The decrease in other current assets is primarily due to a decrease in net income
taxes receivable as a result of the current-year provision for income taxes. This decrease was
partially offset by a $6.5 million reclassification of the Companys investment in two joint
ventures, Internacional Component Supply LTDA and Endorsia.com, from other non-current assets as
these investments are considered assets held for sale at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Net: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
3,420.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,398.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Less: allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,117.7 |
) |
|
|
(2,062.9 |
) |
|
|
(54.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
$ |
1,302.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,335.2 |
|
|
$ |
(32.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment net in the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due
to current-year depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures and the impact of foreign
currency translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
221.0 |
|
|
$ |
221.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
129.8 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
236.2 |
|
|
|
248.6 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
)% |
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
626.6 |
|
|
$ |
649.2 |
|
|
$ |
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to current-year amortization. The
decrease in deferred income taxes is primarily due to a reduction in deferred tax assets caused by
the enactment of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended). Other
non-current assets decreased as a result of the reclassification of the Companys investment in two
joint ventures, Internacional Component Supply LTDA and Endorsia.com, to other current assets as
mentioned on the previous page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Accounts payable |
|
|
221.9 |
|
|
|
156.0 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
161.5 |
|
|
|
142.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
163.7 |
|
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
601.0 |
|
|
$ |
540.4 |
|
|
$ |
60.6 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
The increase in short-term debt was primarily due to increased net borrowings by the Companys
foreign subsidiaries under lines of credit due to higher seasonal working capital requirements.
The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to higher volumes. The increase in accrued
salaries, wages and benefits was the result of accruals for current-year incentive plans in the
first quarter of 2010. The decrease in other current liabilities was primarily due to the payout
of severance payments related to 2009 restructuring activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
471.2 |
|
|
$ |
469.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
579.4 |
|
|
|
690.9 |
|
|
|
(111.5 |
) |
|
|
(16.1 |
)% |
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
601.4 |
|
|
|
604.2 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,757.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,870.9 |
|
|
$ |
(113.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
|
The decrease in accrued pension cost was primarily due to the Companys contribution of
approximately $106 million of contributions to its defined benefit plans during the first quarter
of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
911.1 |
|
|
$ |
896.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,422.8 |
|
|
|
1,402.9 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(699.3 |
) |
|
|
(717.1 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
NM |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,629.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,595.6 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
29
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Earnings invested in the business increased in the first quarter of 2010 by net income of $28.6
million, partially offset by dividends declared of $8.7 million. The decrease in accumulated other
comprehensive loss was primarily due to the recognition of prior-year service costs and actuarial
losses for defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans and a $14.0 million prior
period adjustment related to deferred taxes on post-retirement prescription drug benefits,
specifically the employer subsidy provided by the U.S. government under Medicare Part D. Refer to
Note 13 Income taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion
on the prior period adjustment. These decreases are partially offset by the foreign currency
translation adjustment of $13.2 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to
other currencies, such as the Euro, the Romanian lei and the British pound. See Foreign Currency
for further discussion regarding the impact of foreign currency translation. Treasury shares
increased in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of Company repurchasing stock under its 2006
common stock purchase plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(13.8 |
) |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
|
$ |
(46.9 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
14.5 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(46.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(36.9 |
) |
|
Net cash from operating activities used cash of $13.8 million in the first quarter of 2010 after
providing cash of $33.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. The change in cash from operating
activities was primarily due to higher pension contributions and other postretirement benefit
payments as well as lower cash provided by working capital items, particularly inventories and
accounts receivable, partially offset by higher net income. Pension contributions and other
postretirement benefit payments were $118.7 million for the first quarter of 2010, compared to
$14.7 million for the first quarter of 2009. Accounts receivable used cash of $82.1 million in the
first quarter of 2010 after providing cash of $55.4 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Inventories used cash of $22.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 after providing cash of $59.9
million in the first quarter of 2009. Accounts receivable and inventories increased in the first
quarter of 2010 primarily due to higher volumes compared to the first quarter of 2009. In
addition, the increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by the collection of retained
receivables from the sale of the NRB operations of approximately $30 million to $35 million.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses provided cash of $60.4 million in the first quarter of 2010
after using cash of $133.9 million for the first quarter of 2009. Net income increased $27.7
million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009.
The net cash used by investing activities of $15.1 million for the first three months of 2010
decreased from the same period in 2009 primarily due to an $18.2 million decrease in capital
expenditures in the current year. The Company expects to increase capital expenditures by
approximately 20% in 2010 compared to the 2009 level.
The net cash flows from financing activities used cash of $10.7 million in the first quarter of
2010 after using cash of $9.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, as a result of the Companys
repurchase of $14.0 million of Company stock during the first quarter of 2010. This use of cash
was partially offset by lower cash dividends paid to shareholders and higher net proceeds from
stock option exercises during the first quarter of 2010, compared to the first quarter of 2009.
30
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents of $709.3 million exceeded total debt of $515.9
million. At December 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents of $755.5 million exceeded total debt of
$512.7 million. The net debt to capital ratio was a negative 13.5% and 17.9%, respectively, at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
471.2 |
|
|
|
469.3 |
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
515.9 |
|
|
|
512.7 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(709.3 |
) |
|
|
(755.5 |
) |
|
Net (cash) debt |
|
$ |
(193.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(242.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital: |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (cash) debt |
|
$ |
(193.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(242.8 |
) |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,629.5 |
|
|
|
1,595.6 |
|
|
Net (cash) debt + shareholders equity (capital) |
|
$ |
1,436.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.8 |
|
|
Ratio of net (cash) debt to capital |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
(17.9 |
)% |
|
The Company presents net (cash) debt because it believes net (cash) debt is more representative of
the Companys financial position.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its 364-day Asset Securitization
Agreement (Asset Securitization), which provides for borrowings up to $100 million, subject to
certain borrowing base limitations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the
Company. Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization, as of
March 31, 2010, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under the Asset
Securitization to $97.1 million.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its $500 million Senior Credit
Facility, but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $32.2 million, which reduced the
availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $467.8 million. The Senior Credit Facility
matures on July 10, 2012. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial
covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated
minimum tangible net worth test. At March 31, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the
covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and its other debt agreements. The maximum consolidated
leverage ratio permitted under the Senior Credit Facility is 3.75 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010,
the Companys consolidated leverage ratio was 1.32 to 1.0. The minimum consolidated interest
coverage ratio permitted under the Senior Credit Facility is 4.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, the
Companys consolidated interest coverage ratio was 10.24 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, the
Companys consolidated tangible net worth exceeded the minimum required amount by a significant
margin. Refer to Note 6 Financing Arrangements in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion.
The interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility is based on the Companys consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, the
Company pays a facility fee based on the consolidated leverage ratio multiplied by the aggregate
commitments of all of the lenders under this agreement. Financing costs on the Senior Credit
Facility are being amortized over the life of the new agreement and are expected to result in
approximately $2.9 million in annual interest expense.
31
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Other sources of liquidity include lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries, which provide for borrowings up to $303.9 million. The majority of these lines are
uncommitted. At March 31, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $30.0 million, which
reduced the availability under these facilities to $273.9 million.
The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash on hand and cash generated from
operating activities will be met by the committed funds available under its Asset Securitization
and the Senior Credit Facility. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its
obligations through at least the term of the Senior Credit Facility.
The Company expects to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. However, the Company may need
to limit its borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility or other facilities in order to remain in
compliance. As of March 31, 2010, the Company could have borrowed the full amounts available under
the Senior Credit Facility and Asset Securitization Agreement, and would have still been in
compliance with its debt covenants.
In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes. These
Senior Notes, which mature in September 2014, bear interest at 6.0% per annum. The net proceeds
from the sale of the Senior Notes were used in December 2009 to redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior
Notes maturing in February 2010.
The Companys debt, including the new Senior Notes, is rated Baa3, by Moodys Investor Services
and BBB- by Standard & Poors Ratings Services, both of which are considered investment-grade
credit ratings.
The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations as the Company experiences
improved margins in 2010. In addition, the Company expects to increase capital expenditures by
approximately 20% in 2010, compared to 2009. The Company also expects to make approximately $135
million in pension contributions in 2010, compared to $65 million in 2009, of which $106 million
has been contributed to date.
Financing Obligations and Other Commitments
The Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $135 million, over $100
million of which is discretionary, to its global defined benefit pension plans in 2010. During the
first three months of 2010, the Company has made contributions of approximately $106 million to its
defined pension plans. Returns for the Companys global defined benefit pension plan assets in
2009 were significantly above the expected rate of return assumption of 8.75 percent due to broad
increases in global equity markets. These favorable returns positively impacted the funded status
of the plans at the end of 2009 and are expected to result in lower pension expense and required
pension contributions over the next several years. However, the impact of these favorable returns
will be offset by the impact of the lower discount rate for expense in 2010, compared to 2009.
Returns for the Companys U.S. defined benefit plan pension assets for the first three months of
2010 were approximately 4%, due to the continued strong performance in the global equity markets.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company purchased 500,000 shares of common stock for
approximately $14.0 million under the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan. This plan
authorizes the Company to buy, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, up to
four million shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified
purposes, up to an aggregate of $180 million. The authorization expires on December 31, 2012.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other
persons.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance that
amends the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The implementation of the new accounting guidance related to variable interest entities,
effective January 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
32
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
periods presented. The Company reviews its critical accounting policies throughout the year.
Except for the following critical accounting policy on Inventory, the Company has concluded that
there have been no changes to its critical accounting policies or estimates, as described in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, during the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
Inventory:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 48% valued by the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and the remaining 52% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The majority of the Companys domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and all
of the Companys international (outside the United States) inventories are valued by the FIFO
method. An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of
each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO
calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual results may
differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The Company recognized $6.1 million in LIFO expense for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010,
compared to LIFO income of $11.8 million for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009. Based on
current expectations of inventory levels and costs, the Company expects to recognize approximately
$22 million in LIFO expense for the year ended December 31, 2010. The expected increase in the
LIFO reserve for 2010 is a result of higher costs, especially scrap steel costs, as well as higher
quantities. A 1.0% increase in costs would increase the current LIFO expense estimate for 2010 by
$4.2 million. A 1.0% increase in inventory quantities would increase the current LIFO expense
estimate for 2010 by $0.4 million.
Other Matters:
Foreign Currency:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the
balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the quarter. Related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Foreign currency exchange losses included in the Companys operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 were $1.6 million, compared to a gain of $7.6 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a negative
non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $13.2 million that decreased shareholders
equity, compared to a negative non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $44.5 million
that decreased shareholders equity for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The foreign
currency translation adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was negatively impacted
by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the Euro, the
Romanian lei and the British pound.
33
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements set forth in this document (including the Companys forecasts, beliefs and
expectations) that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis contains numerous forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers
that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company due to a variety of important factors, such as:
a) |
|
continued weakness in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from
the global economic slowdown, terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to,
political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in
countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency
valuations; |
|
b) |
|
the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the
industries in which the Company operates. This includes the ability of the Company to respond
to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer bankruptcies or liquidations,
the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade
continue in the U.S. markets; |
|
c) |
|
competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by
existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing
and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the Companys products are sold
or distributed; |
|
d) |
|
changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Companys
manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and
manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the
Companys ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and
the operation of the Companys surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated
with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction
initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages;
and changes in the cost of labor and benefits; |
|
e) |
|
the success of the Companys operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits
from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired
companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the Companys ability to maintain
appropriate relations with unions that represent Company associates in certain locations in
order to avoid disruptions of business; |
|
f) |
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to,
claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty,
environmental issues, and taxes; |
|
g) |
|
changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest
rates to the extent they affect the Companys ability to raise capital or increase the
Companys cost of funds, including the ability to refinance its unsecured notes, have an
impact on the overall performance of the Companys pension fund investments and/or cause
changes in the global economy and financial markets which affect customer demand and the
ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Companys products or equipment which
contains the Companys products; and |
|
h) |
|
those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this document and in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Additional risks relating to the Companys business, the industries in which the Company operates
or the Companys common stock may be described from time to time in the Companys filings with the
SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties
that may affect actual results and may be beyond the Companys control.
Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Refer to information appearing under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q. Furthermore, a discussion
of market risk exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. There have been no material changes in reported market risk since the
inclusion of this discussion in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K referenced above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a) |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Companys principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).
Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
|
During the Companys most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. |
35
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected
to have a materially adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 included a detailed
discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below amends and updates those risk
factors and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in the
Form 10-K.
We may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits from, or successfully execute, Project
O.N.E.
In 2005, we began implementing Project O.N.E., a multi-year program designed to improve business
processes and systems to deliver enhanced customer service and financial performance. From 2007 to
2009, we completed the installation of Project O.N.E. in most of our Bearings & Power Transmission
operations located in the United States, Europe and India. In May
2010, we began to implement
Project O.N.E. in certain parts of our Aerospace & Defense segment and other manufacturing and
distribution operations in Asia, Europe and Australia. If we are not successful in executing or
operating under Project O.N.E., or if it fails to achieve the anticipated results, then our
operations, margins, sales and reputation could be adversely affected.
Implementing, and operating under, Project O.N.E. will be complex and time-consuming, may be
distracting to management and disruptive to our businesses, and may cause an interruption of, or a
loss of momentum in, our businesses as a result of a number of obstacles, such as:
|
|
|
the loss of key associates or customers; |
|
|
|
|
the failure to maintain the quality of customer service that we have
historically provided; |
|
|
|
|
the need to coordinate geographically diverse organizations; and |
|
|
|
|
the resulting diversion of managements attention from our day-to-day business
and the need to dedicate additional management personnel to address obstacles to the
implementation of Project O.N.E. |
If we are not successful in executing, or operating under, Project O.N.E., or if it fails to
achieve the anticipated results, then our operations, margins, sales and reputation could be
adversely affected.
36
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Common Stock
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 of its common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as |
|
shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly |
|
may yet |
|
|
Total number |
|
Average |
|
announced |
|
be purchased |
|
|
of shares |
|
price paid |
|
plans or |
|
under the plans |
Period |
|
purchased(1) |
|
per share(2) |
|
programs |
|
or programs(3) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 1/31/10 |
|
|
10,539 |
|
|
$ |
24.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
2/1/10 - 2/28/10 |
|
|
91,639 |
|
|
|
23.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
3/1/10 - 3/31/10 |
|
|
504,724 |
|
|
|
27.97 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
606,902 |
|
|
$ |
27.25 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
With respect to the shares purchased in January and February and 4,724 shares purchased in March,
amounts present
shares of the Companys common stock that are owned and tendered by employees to exercise stock options, and
to satisfy withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares. |
|
(2) |
|
For shares tendered in connection with the vesting of restricted shares, the average price paid per share
is an average
calculated using the daily high and low of the Companys common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange
at the time of vesting. For shares tendered in connection with the exercise of stock options, the price paid is the real
time trading stock price at the time the options are exercised. |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan, the Company may purchase up to four million
shares of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the aggregate. The Company may purchase
shares under its 2006 common stock purchase plan until December 31, 2012. The Company may purchase shares
from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or
part of the purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 1065-1 plans. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Performance Unit Agreement was filed on March 30, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File
No. 1-1169) and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
12 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President Finance and
Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
Certifications of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) and Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President Finance and
Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
|
|
Date May 5, 2010 |
By |
/s/ James W. Griffith
|
|
|
|
James W. Griffith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date May 5, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
|
|
|
|
Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Finance
and Administration (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|