Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
1-10524 (UDR, Inc.)
333-156002-01 (United Dominion Realty, L.P.)
UDR, Inc.
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland (UDR, Inc.)
|
|
54-0857512 |
Delaware (United Dominion Realty, L.P.)
|
|
54-1776887 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation of organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(720) 283-6120
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
|
|
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
|
|
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Dominion Realty, L.P.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
Yes o No þ |
|
|
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes o No þ |
The
number of shares of UDR, Inc.s common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding as of October 28,
2011, was 219,042,841.
UDR, INC.
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
INDEX
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2011 of UDR, Inc. a Maryland corporation, and United Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership, of which UDR is the parent company and sole general partner. Unless the context
otherwise requires, all references in this Report to we, us, our, the Company, UDR or
UDR, Inc. refer collectively to UDR, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries and joint
ventures, including the Operating Partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, the
references in this Report to the Operating Partnership refer to United Dominion Realty, L.P.
together with its consolidated subsidiaries. Common stock refers to the common stock of UDR and
stockholders means the holders of shares of UDRs common stock and preferred stock. The limited
partnership interests of the Operating Partnership are referred to as OP Units and the holders of
the OP Units are referred to as unitholders. This combined Form 10-Q is being filed separately by
UDR and the Operating Partnership.
There are a number of differences between our company and our operating partnership,
which are reflected in our disclosure in this report. UDR is a real estate investment trust (a
REIT), whose most significant asset is its ownership interest in the Operating Partnership. UDR
also conducts business through other subsidiaries and operating partnerships, including its
subsidiary RE3, whose activities include development of land. UDR acts as
the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, holds interests in other operating
partnerships, subsidiaries and joint ventures, owns and operates properties, issues securities from
time to time and guarantees debt of certain of our subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership conducts
the operations of a substantial portion of the business and is structured as a partnership with no
publicly traded equity securities. The Operating Partnership has guaranteed certain outstanding
securities of UDR.
As of September 30, 2011, UDR owned 110,883 units of the general partnership interests of the
Operating Partnership and 174,741,015 units (or approximately 94.9%) of the limited partnership
interests of the Operating Partnership (the OP Units). UDR conducts a substantial amount of its
business and holds a substantial amount of its assets through the Operating Partnership, and, by
virtue of its ownership of the OP Units and being the Operating Partnerships sole general partner,
UDR has the ability to control all of the day-to-day operations of the Operating Partnership.
Separate financial statements and accompanying notes, as well as separate discussions under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are
provided for each of UDR and the Operating Partnership. This combined Form 10-Q is being filed
separately by UDR and the Operating Partnership.
UDR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
7,988,133 |
|
|
$ |
6,398,630 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,794,150 |
) |
|
|
(1,550,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment, net |
|
|
6,193,983 |
|
|
|
4,847,783 |
|
Real estate under development (net of accumlated depreciation of $115 and $0) |
|
|
192,815 |
|
|
|
97,912 |
|
Real estate held for sale
(net of accumulated depreciation of $9,835 and $87,479) |
|
|
36,366 |
|
|
|
297,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
6,423,164 |
|
|
|
5,243,021 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
19,641 |
|
|
|
15,447 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
23,709 |
|
|
|
27,267 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
187,176 |
|
|
|
148,057 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
129,931 |
|
|
|
74,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,804,903 |
|
|
$ |
5,529,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
2,004,525 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,872 |
|
Secured debt real estate held for sale |
|
|
17,159 |
|
|
|
122,798 |
|
Unsecured debt |
|
|
1,967,661 |
|
|
|
1,603,834 |
|
Real estate taxes payable |
|
|
28,729 |
|
|
|
14,585 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
23,924 |
|
|
|
20,889 |
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent |
|
|
37,685 |
|
|
|
26,046 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
47,489 |
|
|
|
36,561 |
|
Deferred fees and gains on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
29,106 |
|
|
|
28,943 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
109,066 |
|
|
|
105,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,265,344 |
|
|
|
3,800,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
208,766 |
|
|
|
119,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
46,571 |
|
|
|
46,571 |
|
2,803,812 shares of 8.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible issued
and outstanding (2,803,812 shares at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,264,362 shares of 6.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable issued
and outstanding (3,405,562 shares at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
81,609 |
|
|
|
85,139 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized
219,038,779 shares issued and outstanding (182,496,330 shares
at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,322,505 |
|
|
|
2,450,141 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
|
(1,111,356 |
) |
|
|
(973,864 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net |
|
|
(15,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,326,092 |
|
|
|
1,606,343 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,330,793 |
|
|
|
1,610,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,804,903 |
|
|
$ |
5,529,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
UDR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
187,320 |
|
|
$ |
150,139 |
|
|
$ |
521,679 |
|
|
$ |
435,152 |
|
Non-property income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
12,620 |
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
192,549 |
|
|
|
152,331 |
|
|
|
534,299 |
|
|
|
440,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance |
|
|
22,548 |
|
|
|
17,832 |
|
|
|
63,040 |
|
|
|
53,933 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
14,575 |
|
|
|
13,945 |
|
|
|
44,131 |
|
|
|
39,855 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
|
8,537 |
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
|
|
24,268 |
|
Repair and maintenance |
|
|
10,575 |
|
|
|
9,211 |
|
|
|
28,807 |
|
|
|
24,663 |
|
Administrative and marketing |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
11,773 |
|
|
|
11,182 |
|
Property management |
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
4,342 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
95,436 |
|
|
|
70,880 |
|
|
|
265,184 |
|
|
|
207,061 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred |
|
|
39,617 |
|
|
|
36,129 |
|
|
|
112,281 |
|
|
|
105,678 |
|
Amortization of convertible debt discount |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Other debt charges |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,919 |
|
|
|
11,994 |
|
|
|
35,512 |
|
|
|
31,927 |
|
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
216,565 |
|
|
|
180,138 |
|
|
|
615,770 |
|
|
|
522,506 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(24,016 |
) |
|
|
(27,807 |
) |
|
|
(81,471 |
) |
|
|
(81,635 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(25,596 |
) |
|
|
(28,642 |
) |
|
|
(85,731 |
) |
|
|
(84,392 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
58,198 |
|
|
|
7,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
|
(13,786 |
) |
|
|
(24,605 |
) |
|
|
(27,533 |
) |
|
|
(77,271 |
) |
Net loss attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in OP |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
|
(13,251 |
) |
|
|
(23,766 |
) |
|
|
(26,475 |
) |
|
|
(74,443 |
) |
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(2,793 |
) |
|
|
(2,794 |
) |
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series G |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(1,436 |
) |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
(4,325 |
) |
(Premium)/discount on preferred stock repurchases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(15,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per weighted average common share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
|
($0.18 |
) |
|
|
($0.47 |
) |
|
|
($0.55 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
($0.07 |
) |
|
|
($0.16 |
) |
|
|
($0.17 |
) |
|
|
($0.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common distributions declared per share |
|
$ |
0.200 |
|
|
$ |
0.185 |
|
|
$ |
0.585 |
|
|
$ |
0.545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
213,816 |
|
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
|
195,723 |
|
|
|
160,841 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
UDR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
6,209,374 |
|
|
$ |
131,710 |
|
|
|
182,496,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
$ |
2,450,141 |
|
|
$ |
(973,864 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,469 |
) |
|
$ |
3,687 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,030 |
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,475 |
) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on sale of marketable securities
reclassified into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,492 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,895 |
) |
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,057 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,652 |
|
Issuance of common shares through public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,895,944 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
863,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864,310 |
|
Redemption of 141,200 shares of 6.75% Series G Cumulative
Redeemable Shares |
|
|
(141,200 |
) |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,597 |
) |
Adjustment for conversion of non-controlling interest of
unitholders in Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
Increase in non-controlling interest from business
combination, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Common stock distributions declared ($0.585 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,364 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series E
($0.6644 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,793 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series G
($0.843715 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
Adjustment to reflect redemption value of
redeemable non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
6,068,174 |
|
|
$ |
128,180 |
|
|
|
219,038,784 |
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
3,322,505 |
|
|
$ |
(1,111,356 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,427 |
) |
|
$ |
4,701 |
|
|
$ |
2,330,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(27,533 |
) |
|
$ |
(77,271 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
276,008 |
|
|
|
225,246 |
|
Net gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(3,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of cost investments |
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
(56,063 |
) |
|
|
(4,034 |
) |
Loss on debt extinguishment |
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Write off of bad debt |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
4,260 |
|
|
|
2,757 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
5,861 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
7,650 |
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
Amortization of convertible debt discount |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Changes in income tax accruals |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
(2,702 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating assets |
|
|
(30,395 |
) |
|
|
(10,364 |
) |
(Increase)/decrease in operating liabilities |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
182,921 |
|
|
|
157,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate investments, net |
|
|
77,130 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments related to the buyout of joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,141 |
) |
Acquisition of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed) and initial capital expenditures |
|
(943,045 |
) |
|
|
(342,697 |
) |
Cash paid in
nonmonetary asset exchange |
|
|
(28,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Development of real estate assets |
|
|
(70,574 |
) |
|
|
(79,718 |
) |
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets, net of escrow reimbursement |
|
(68,125 |
) |
|
|
(52,681 |
) |
Capital expenditures non-real estate assets |
|
|
(12,260 |
) |
|
|
(3,332 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(47,509 |
) |
|
|
(5,697 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
4,592 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Purchase deposits on pending real estate acquisitions |
|
|
(3,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,086,784 |
) |
|
|
(478,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on secured debt |
|
|
(222,767 |
) |
|
|
(99,745 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt |
|
|
30,542 |
|
|
|
62,833 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of unsecured debt |
|
|
296,964 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
Payments on unsecured debt |
|
|
(264,829 |
) |
|
|
(79,488 |
) |
Net proceeds/(repayment) of revolving bank debt |
|
|
330,250 |
|
|
|
(76,700 |
) |
Payment of financing costs |
|
|
(4,192 |
) |
|
|
(5,040 |
) |
Issuance of common and restricted stock, net |
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
4,680 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares through public offering, net |
|
|
864,310 |
|
|
|
467,783 |
|
Payments for the repurchase of Series G preferred stock, net |
|
|
(3,597 |
) |
|
|
(637 |
) |
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(8,717 |
) |
|
|
(3,069 |
) |
Distributions paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(7,003 |
) |
|
|
(7,119 |
) |
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(106,934 |
) |
|
|
(87,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
907,859 |
|
|
|
325,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,996 |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
|
$ |
10,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
128,021 |
|
|
$ |
120,424 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate acquired in asset exchange |
|
|
268,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate disposed in asset exchange |
|
|
192,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
consideration accrued in business combination |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
OP Units issued in partial consideration for property acquisition |
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt assumed in the acquisitions of properties, including asset exchange |
|
|
247,805 |
|
|
|
91,442 |
|
Secured debt transferred in asset exchange |
|
|
55,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value of secured debt assumed in acquisitions of properties, including asset exchange |
|
26,880 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
Fair market value of
land contributed by non-controlling interest |
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
consideration to acquire non-real estate asset
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Conversion of operating partnership non-controlling interests to common stock
(4,453 shares in 2011 and 445,560 shares in 2010) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
8,320 |
|
Retirement of fully depreciated assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,680 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
UDR, Inc., collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries (UDR, the Company, we, our,
or us) is a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires,
renovates, develops, redevelops, and manages apartment communities. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of UDR and its subsidiaries, including United Dominion
Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership). As of September 30, 2011, there were 184,281,254 units
in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which 174,851,898 units or 94.9% were owned by UDR and
9,429,356 units or 5.1% were owned by limited partners. The consolidated financial statements of
UDR include the non-controlling interests of the unitholders in the Operating Partnership.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted
according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as of
September 30, 2011, and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim
results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full year.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December
31, 2010 appearing in UDRs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 5, 2011.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts
realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain previously reported amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial statements were issued.
Except as disclosed in Note 16, Subsequent Event, no other recognized or non-recognized subsequent
events were noted.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
Revenue and real estate sales gain recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in
accordance with FASB ASC 840, Leases and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. Rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis and recognized when earned. The
Company recognizes interest income, management and other fees and incentives when earned, and the
amounts are fixed and determinable.
The Company accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate
Sales. For sale transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as
the Company no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets
and liabilities from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and record the gain or loss in the period the
transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to
our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for
the transaction under an alternate method of accounting. Unless certain limited criteria are met,
non-monetary transactions, including property exchanges, are accounted for at fair value.
7
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Sales to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted for as partial
sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual method have been
satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize profit
proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and defer the gain on the interest we retain.
The Company recognizes any deferred gain when the property is sold to a third party. In
transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority equity
interest in the venture was provided a preference as to cash flows in either an operating or a
capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the
extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the
entire property.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities represented common stock in a publicly held company. Marketable
securities were classified as available-for-sale, and were carried at fair value with unrealized
gains and losses reported as a component of stockholders equity. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, the Company sold marketable securities for $3.5 million, resulting in a gross
realized gain of $3.1 million, which is included in Other Income on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations. The cost of securities sold was based on the specific identification method.
Unrealized gains of $3.5 million were reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss) into earnings during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
The amortization of any discount and interest income on previously held debt securities are
included in Other Income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Preferred Share repurchases
When repurchasing Preferred Stock, the Company recognizes share issuance costs as a charge to
the Preferred Stock on a pro rata basis to the total costs incurred for the Preferred Stock
offering as well as any premium or discount on the repurchase. The Company recognized a net
decrease of $175,000 and a net increase of $25,000 to net loss attributable to common stockholders
for nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are reported in
"(Premium)/discount on preferred stock repurchases, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Income Taxes
Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT and the nature of the operations for the
operating properties, no provision for federal income taxes has been provided for at UDR.
Historically, the Company has generally incurred only state and local income, excise and franchise
taxes. UDR has elected for certain consolidated subsidiaries to be treated as Taxable REIT
Subsidiaries (TRS), primarily those engaged in development and property management activities.
Income taxes for our TRS are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax
rate is recognized in earnings in the period of the enactment date. The Companys deferred tax
assets are generally the result of differing depreciable lives on capitalized assets and timing of
expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. As of September 30, 2011, UDR recorded a net
current liability of $301,000 and a deferred tax asset of $6.6 million (net of a valuation
allowance of $49.6 million). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, UDR
recorded income tax expense of $368,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, UDR recorded income tax benefit of $3.0 million and $2.5
million, respectively, from the write-off of income tax payable. These are classified in General
and Administrative expenses.
8
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (Topic 740) defines a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. Topic 740 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company recognizes its tax positions and evaluates them using a two-step process. First,
we determine whether a tax position is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent probability)
to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Then the Company will determine the
amount of benefit to recognize and record the amount that is more likely than not to be realized
upon ultimate settlement.
UDR had no unrecognized tax benefit, accrued interest or penalties at September 30, 2011. UDR
and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state
jurisdictions. The tax years 2007 2010 remain open to examination by the major taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject. When applicable, UDR recognizes interest and/or penalties
related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Company consist of income producing operating properties,
properties under development, land held for future development, and properties held for sale. As of
September 30, 2011, the Company owned and consolidated 172 communities in 11 states plus the
District of Columbia totaling 49,674 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying
amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,970,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,669,004 |
|
Depreciable property held and used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
5,715,898 |
|
|
|
4,444,310 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and
equipment |
|
|
301,761 |
|
|
|
285,316 |
|
Under development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
91,051 |
|
|
|
62,410 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
101,879 |
|
|
|
35,502 |
|
Held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
13,572 |
|
|
|
114,703 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
26,399 |
|
|
|
252,104 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and
equipment |
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
17,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
|
8,227,264 |
|
|
|
6,881,347 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,804,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,638,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned, net |
|
$ |
6,423,164 |
|
|
$ |
5,243,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The following table summarizes UDRs real estate community acquisitions for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
Property Name |
|
|
Market |
|
Acquisition Date |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Price (a) |
|
|
10 Hanover Square |
|
New York, NY |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
493 |
|
|
$ |
259,750 |
|
388 Beale |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
90,500 |
|
14 North |
|
Boston, MA |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
64,500 |
|
Inwood West |
|
Boston, MA |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
View 14 |
|
Metropolitan D.C. |
|
June 2011 |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
105,538 |
|
Rivergate |
|
New York, NY |
|
July 2011 |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
443,403 |
|
21 Chelsea |
|
New York, NY |
|
August 2011 |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
138,930 |
|
95 Wall |
|
New York, NY |
|
August 2011 |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
328,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,539,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The purchase price is the contractual sales price between UDR and the third party and
does not include any costs that the Company incurred in the pursuit
of the property or the recorded difference between the agreed upon
value and the fair value of the OP Units issued as part of the
consideration paid. |
In August 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of 95
Wall. The community was acquired for $328.9 million, which included the issuance of 1,802,239
operating partnership units (OP Units) of the Operating Partnership. The OP Units were
deemed to have an agreed upon value equal to the greater of $25.00 or the volume weighted average closing price per share of the
Companys common stock for the 10 day period ended on (and including) the date one business day
prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting purposes, the fair value of these OP
units was $26.71 at the settlement date.
In April 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of 10
Hanover Square. The community was acquired for $259.8 million, which included assumed debt
with a fair value of $208.1 million, and the issuance of 2,569,606 OP Units of the
Operating Partnership. The OP Units were deemed to have an agreed
upon value equal to the greater of $25.00
or the volume weighted average closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10 day period ended on (and
including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting
purposes, the fair value of these OP units was $24.47 at the
settlement date.
In April 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership completed a $500 million asset
exchange whereby UDR acquired 388 Beale, and the Operating Partnership acquired 14 North, and
Inwood West. The communities acquired were valued at $263.0 million representing their estimated
fair value. The Company paid $28.1 million of cash and assumed debt with a fair
value of $61.7 million. UDR sold two multifamily apartment communities (434 homes) and the
Operating Partnership sold four multifamily apartment communities (984 homes) located in California
as part of the transaction. (See Note 4, Discontinued Operations, for further discussion of real
estate community dispositions.)
The Company allocates the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired based on their estimated fair value. When allocating cost to an acquired community,
the Company first allocates costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease
agreements and then to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the
community is vacant. The primary, although not only, identifiable intangible asset associated with
our portfolio is the value of existing lease agreements. The Company estimates the intangible value
of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up.
Total
acquisition cost of the communities, including the difference between
the agreed upon value of the OP
Units and the fair value of the OP Units issued at the acquisition date (if applicable),
was allocated $301.7 million to land; $1.2 billion to buildings and improvements; $6.1 million to
furniture, fixtures, and equipment; $39.6 million to intangible
assets; $3.1 million to
intangible below market lease liabilities; and $305.5 million
to assumed debt.
10
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The Companys results of operations include operating revenues of $31.4 million and loss from
continuing operations of $15.8 million of the acquired properties from the acquisition dates to
September 30, 2011.
The unaudited pro forma information below summarizes the Companys combined results of
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 as though the above
acquisitions were completed on January 1, 2010. The information for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 includes pro forma results for the portion of the period prior to the
acquisition date and actual results from the date of acquisition through the end of the period. The
supplemental pro forma operating data is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of
operations would have been assuming the transaction had been
completed as set forth above, nor does
it purport to represent the Companys results of operations for future periods (in thousands
except for per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma revenues |
|
$ |
193,352 |
|
|
$ |
177,906 |
|
|
$ |
561,949 |
|
|
$ |
534,228 |
|
Pro forma loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
(16,053 |
) |
|
|
(26,380 |
) |
|
|
(45,764 |
) |
|
|
(79,107 |
) |
Proforma
loss attributable to common stockholders basic |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
Pro forma loss attributable to common stockholders
diluted |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired five
operating communities with 1,374 apartment homes for a total purchase price of $412 million and a
parcel of land for a total gross purchase price of $23.6 million.
The Company incurred $2.0 million and $4.7 million of acquisition related costs during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $2.7 million of acquisition
related costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. These expenses are
classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item entitled General and
administrative, and have been excluded from the pro forma results as the costs do not have a
continuing impact on the results of operations.
All development projects and related carrying costs are capitalized and reported on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as Real estate under development. The costs of development projects
which include interest, real estate taxes, insurance and allocated development overhead related to
support costs for personnel working directly on the development site are capitalized during the
construction period. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, total
interest capitalized was $3.4 million and $9.5 million and $2.6 million and $9.9 million,
respectively.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that UDR has either sold or which management
believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be classified as held for
sale and reported as discontinued operations, a propertys operations and cash flows have been or
will be divested to a third party by the Company whereby UDR will not have any continuing
involvement in the ownership or operation of the property after the sale or disposition. The
results of operations of the property are presented as discontinued operations for all periods
presented and do not impact the net earnings reported by the Company. Once a property is deemed as
held for sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Company determines that the
property no longer meets the criteria of held for sale, the Company will recapture any unrecorded
depreciation for the property. The assets and liabilities of properties classified as held for sale
are presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of their carrying amount
or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.
11
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
As discussed in Note 3, Real Estate Owned, in conjunction with the asset exchange that closed
in April 2011, UDR sold six multifamily apartment communities (1,418 homes). In May 2011, UDR
sold an apartment community with 289 homes located in Dallas, Texas. In September 2011, the Company
sold two communities with 450 homes located in Dallas, Texas. The Company had two communities
with 644 apartment homes that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and included in
discontinued operations at September 30, 2011. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, UDR recognized gains on the sale of communities for financial reporting
purposes of $11.4 million and $56.1 million, respectively, which are included in discontinued
operations. The results of operations for the following properties are classified on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item entitled Income from discontinued
operations.
Discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 also
includes operating activities related to one 149 unit community sold during the third quarter of
2010.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
$ |
10,186 |
|
|
$ |
16,488 |
|
|
$ |
30,723 |
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
10,196 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
32,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
Property management fee |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
Real estate depreciation |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
6,646 |
|
|
|
14,463 |
|
Interest |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
10,037 |
|
|
|
14,353 |
|
|
|
29,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before net gain on the sale of
depreciable property |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
56,063 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
11,810 |
|
|
$ |
4,037 |
|
|
$ |
58,198 |
|
|
$ |
7,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. JOINT VENTURES
UDR has entered into joint ventures with unrelated third parties to acquire real estate assets
that are either consolidated and included in real estate owned on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
or are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and are included in investment in
unconsolidated joint ventures on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company consolidates an
entity in which we own less than 100% but control the joint venture as well as any variable
interest entity where we are the primary beneficiary. In addition, the Company would consolidate
any joint venture in which we are the general partner or managing member and the third party does
not have the ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process nor do they have
the ability to remove us as general partner or managing member without cause.
UDRs joint ventures are funded with a combination of debt and equity. Our losses are limited
to our investment and except as noted below, the Company does not guarantee any debt, capital
payout or other obligations associated with our joint venture portfolio.
12
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Consolidated Joint Ventures
In August 2011, the Company invested in a joint venture with an unaffiliated third party to
acquire and redevelop an existing commercial property into a 173 apartment home community in Orange
County, California. At closing the Company contributed $9 million and at September 30, 2011, UDR
owned a 90% controlling interest in the investment. Under the terms of the operating agreement, our
partner is required to achieve certain criteria as it relates to the entitlement process. If the
criteria is met on or before 730 days after the site plan application is deemed complete by the city, the Company is obligated to contribute an additional $3 million
to the joint venture for distribution to our partner. At the acquisition date, the Company accrued
and capitalized $3 million related to the contingent consideration, which represents the difference
between fair value of the property of $9.8 million on the formation date and the estimated fair
value of the underlying property upon completion of the entitlement process of $12.8 million. The
Company estimated the fair value based on Level 3 inputs utilized in a third party valuation.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company paid $450,000 to
acquire from our partner its remaining 2% noncontrolling interests in the 989 Elements, Elements
Too, and Bellevue joint ventures. The consideration paid was in excess of the book value of the
noncontrolling interest, and is reflected as a reduction of the Companys equity.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company recognizes earnings or losses from our investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures consisting of our proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of the joint ventures.
In addition, we may earn fees for providing management services to the unconsolidated joint
ventures. As of September 30, 2011, UDR had investments in the following unconsolidated joint
ventures which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
In November 2010, the Company acquired The Hanover Companys (Hanover) partnership interests
in the Hanover/MetLife Master Limited Partnership (the UDR/MetLife Partnership) at a cost of
$100.8 million. The UDR/MetLife Partnership owns a portfolio of 26 operating communities containing
5,748 apartment homes and 10 land parcels with the potential to develop approximately 2,000
additional apartment homes. Under the terms of the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR acts as the general
partner and earns fees for property and asset management and financing transactions.
UDR has a weighted average ownership interest of 12.27% in the operating communities and 4.11%
in the land parcels. The initial investment of $100.8 million consisted of $71.8 million in cash,
which included associated transaction costs, and a $30 million payable (includes present value
discount of $1 million) to Hanover. UDR agreed to pay the $30 million balance to Hanover in two
interest free installments in the amounts of $20 million and $10 million on the first and second
anniversaries of the closing, respectively. The $30 million payable was recorded at its present
value of $29 million using an effective interest rate of 2.67%. At September 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, the net carrying value of the payable was $29.7 million and $29.1 million, respectively.
Interest expense of $197,000 and $588,000 was recorded during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys
investment was $128.1 million and $122.2 million, respectively.
UDRs total cost of its equity investment of $100.8 million differed from the proportionate
share in the underlying net assets of the UDR/MetLife Partnership of $111.4 million. The difference
of $10.6 million was attributable to certain assets and adjustments that were allocated to UDRs
proportionate share in the UDR/MetLife Partnerships buildings of $8.4 million, land of $3.9
million, and ($1.6 million) of lease intangible assets. With the exception of land, the difference
related to buildings is amortized and recorded as a component of loss from unconsolidated entities
over 45 years and the difference related to lease intangible assets is amortized and recorded as a
component of loss from unconsolidated entities over 11 months with the offset to the Companys
carrying value of its equity investment. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
the Company recorded $396,000 and $1.2 million of amortization, respectively.
In connection with the purchase of Hanovers interests in the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR
agreed to indemnify Hanover from liabilities arising from Hanovers guaranty of $506 million in
loans ($156 million outstanding at September 30, 2011) which are secured by a security interest in
the operating communities subject to the respective loans. The loans are to the sub-tier
partnerships which own the 26 operating communities. The Company anticipates that the balance of
these loans will be refinanced by the UDR/MetLife Partnership over the next twelve months.
13
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
In October 2010, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of Hanover to
develop a 240-home community in Stoughton, Massachusetts. At September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, UDR owned a noncontrolling interest of 95% in the joint venture. Our initial investment was
$10 million. Our investment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $17.3 million and $10.3
million, respectively.
In May 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of Hanover to develop
a 263-home community in San Diego, California. At September 30, 2011 and at closing, UDR owned a
noncontrolling interest of 95% in the joint venture. Our initial investment was $9.9 million and
our investment at September 30, 2011 was $11.1 million.
In June 2011, the UDR/MetLife Partnership sold a parcel of land to a joint venture, which the
Company entered into with an affiliate of Hanover, to develop a 256-home community in College Park,
Maryland. At September 30, 2011 and at closing, UDR owned a noncontrolling interest of 95% in the
joint venture. Our initial investment was $7.1 million and our investment at September 30, 2011 was
$7.6 million.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party, which formed a joint venture for the
investment of up to $450 million in multifamily properties located in key, high barrier to entry
markets. The partners will contribute equity of $180 million of which the Companys maximum equity
will be 30% or $54 million when fully invested. In 2010, the joint venture acquired its first
property (151 homes) and in August 2011, it acquired its second property (217 homes) in
Metropolitan Washington D.C. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company owned a 30%
interest in the joint venture. Our investment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $15.3
million and $5.2 million, respectively.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party which owns and operates 10 operating
properties located in Texas (3,992 homes). UDR contributed cash and a property equal to 20% of the
fair value of the properties. The unaffiliated member contributed cash equal to 80% of the fair
value of the properties comprising the joint venture, which was then used to purchase the nine
operating properties from UDR. Our initial investment was $20.4 million. Our investment at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $7.8 million and $10.3 million, respectively.
We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that there may be an other-than-temporary decline in value. We consider
various factors to determine if a decrease in the value of the investment is other-than-temporary.
The Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary decrease in the value of its other
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010.
14
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Combined summary financial information relating to all of the unconsolidated joint ventures
operations (not just our proportionate share), is presented below for the three and nine months
ended September 30, (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
51,290 |
|
|
$ |
11,015 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,327 |
|
|
|
5,753 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(4,507 |
) |
|
|
(3,945 |
) |
UDR recorded loss from unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
146,295 |
|
|
$ |
31,647 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
50,665 |
|
|
|
16,322 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(13,238 |
) |
|
|
(12,610 |
) |
UDR recorded loss from unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
Combined summary balance sheets relating to all of the unconsolidated joint ventures (not just
our proportionate share) are presented below as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Real estate, net |
|
$ |
2,761,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,692,167 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,916,812 |
|
|
|
2,807,886 |
|
Amount due to UDR |
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
Third party debt |
|
|
1,515,470 |
|
|
|
1,524,872 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,574,625 |
|
|
|
1,580,733 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
14,598 |
|
|
|
14,537 |
|
Equity |
|
|
1,327,589 |
|
|
|
1,212,616 |
|
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had deferred fees and deferred profit from the sale of
properties to a joint venture of $29.1 million, the majority of which the Company will not
recognize until the underlying property is sold to a third party. The Company recognized $2.5
million and $6.4 million and $453,000 and $1.5 million of management fees during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for our management of the joint ventures.
The management fees are classified in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company may, in the future, make additional capital contributions to certain of our joint
ventures should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund acquisitions and operating
shortfalls.
15
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
6. SECURED DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification of the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Company having effectively
established a fixed interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt, including debt
related to real estate held for sale, which encumbers $3.2 billion or 39.0% of UDRs total real
estate owned based upon gross book value ($5.0 billion or 61.0% of UDRs real estate owned based on gross
book value is unencumbered) consists of the following as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Communities |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
Encumbered |
|
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
616,430 |
|
|
$ |
292,236 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
895,233 |
|
|
|
897,318 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt |
|
|
1,511,663 |
|
|
|
1,202,879 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
154,870 |
|
|
|
405,641 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable |
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,451 |
|
|
|
260,450 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt |
|
|
510,021 |
|
|
|
760,791 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt |
|
$ |
2,021,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,963,670 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR has five secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $1.4
billion at September 30, 2011. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10
years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be
extended for an additional five years at our option. We have $895.2 million of the outstanding
balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.32% and the remaining balance on these
facilities is currently at a weighted average variable interest rate of 1.61%. Further information
related to these credit facilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding |
|
$ |
1,155,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,157,768 |
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
1,156,606 |
|
|
|
1,198,771 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
1,157,557 |
|
|
|
1,209,739 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
The Company will from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt instruments.
In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair value and
amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life of the
underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair market adjustment was a net premium of $25.3
million and $694,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
16
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from November 2011 through June
2032 and carry interest rates ranging from 1.93% to 6.76%. Mortgage notes payable includes debt
associated with development activities.
Secured credit facilities. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $895.2 million outstanding
of fixed rate secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae with a weighted average fixed interest rate
of 5.32%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from November 2011 through
December 2015. The mortgage notes payable are based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which
translate into interest rates ranging from 0.93% to 2.87% at September 30, 2011.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable. The variable rate mortgage notes payable that secure
tax-exempt housing bond issues mature at various dates between August 2019 and March 2030. Interest
on these notes is payable in monthly installments. The variable mortgage notes have interest rates
ranging from 0.70% to 0.89% as of September 30, 2011.
Secured credit facilities. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $260.5 million outstanding
of variable rate secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae with a weighted average floating
interest rate of 1.61%.
The aggregate maturities, including amortizing principal payments, of our secured debt due
during each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax-Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
Notes |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Secured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
26,255 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
18,241 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,513 |
|
|
$ |
84,733 |
|
2012 |
|
|
65,468 |
|
|
|
177,944 |
|
|
|
22,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,529 |
|
|
|
325,634 |
|
2013 |
|
|
23,392 |
|
|
|
38,632 |
|
|
|
62,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,762 |
|
2014 |
|
|
81,097 |
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
35,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,868 |
|
2015 |
|
|
201,687 |
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,964 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
218,531 |
|
|
|
671,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
161,409 |
|
|
|
1,145,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
616,430 |
|
|
$ |
895,233 |
|
|
$ |
154,870 |
|
|
$ |
94,700 |
|
|
$ |
260,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,021,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
7. UNSECURED DEBT
A summary of unsecured debt as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding under an unsecured credit facility due July 2012 (a) |
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.625% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2011 (net of Subtopic 470-20 discount
of $1,138 at December 31, 2010) (b), (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,961 |
|
5.00% Medium-Term Notes due January 2012 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
2.97% Term Notes due December 2013 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
6.05% Medium-Term Notes due June 2013 |
|
|
122,500 |
|
|
|
122,500 |
|
5.13% Medium-Term Notes due January 2014 |
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
5.50% Medium-Term Notes due April 2014 (net of discount of $174 and $226) |
|
|
128,326 |
|
|
|
128,274 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2015 (includes discount of $422 and $519) (c) |
|
|
324,753 |
|
|
|
324,656 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2016 |
|
|
83,260 |
|
|
|
83,260 |
|
2.27% Term Notes due January 2016 (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
3.48% Term Notes due January 2016 (e) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
8.50% Debentures due September 2024 |
|
|
15,644 |
|
|
|
15,644 |
|
4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2035 (f), (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,750 |
|
4.25% Medium-Term Notes due June 2018 (net of discount of $2,858) (d) |
|
|
297,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,605,661 |
|
|
|
1,572,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,967,661 |
|
|
$ |
1,603,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our unsecured credit facility provides us with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600
million, which at our election we can increase to $750 million under certain circumstances.
Our unsecured credit facility with a consortium of financial institutions carries an interest
rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 47.5 basis points (0.7% and 0.9% interest rate at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) and matures in July 2012. In addition,
the unsecured credit facility contains a provision that allows us to bid up to 50% of the
commitment and we can bid out the entire unsecured credit facility once per quarter so long as
we maintain an investment grade rating. See Note 16, Subsequent Events. |
|
(b) |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company paid $97.1 million at maturity. |
|
(c) |
|
On December 7, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement
with respect to the issue and sale by the Company from time to time of its Medium-Term Notes,
Series A Due Nine Months or More From Date of Issue. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, the Company issued $150 million of 5.25% senior unsecured medium-term notes under the
Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement. These notes were priced at 99.46% of the
principal amount at issuance and had a discount of $422,000 at September 30, 2011. |
|
(d) |
|
On May 3, 2011, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement
with respect to the issue and sale by the Company from time to time of its Medium-Term Notes,
Series A Due Nine Months or More From Date of Issue. During the three months ended June 30,
2011, the Company issued $300 million of 4.25% senior unsecured medium-term notes under the
Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement. These notes were priced at 98.988% of the
principal amount at issuance and had a discount of $2.9 million at September 30, 2011. |
18
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
|
|
|
(e) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a new interest rate
swap agreement for the remaining $150 million balance. As a result, the $250 million term
notes carry a fixed interest rate of 3.48% at September 30, 2011. |
|
(f) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, holders of the 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes
due 2035 tendered $10.8 million of Notes. As a result, the Company retired debt with a
notional value of $10.8 million and wrote off unamortized financing costs of $207,000. |
|
|
|
On March 2, 2011, the Company called all of its outstanding 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due
2035. The redemption date for the Notes was April 4, 2011, and the redemption price was 100% of
the principal amount of the outstanding Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes to,
but not including, the date of redemption. Subject to and in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in the Indenture governing the Notes dated as of December 19, 2005, holders
of Notes had the right to convert their Notes at any time until March 31, 2011, at a conversion
rate of 38.8650 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $25.73 per share). The Company accelerated the amortization of
the remaining financing costs of $3.0 million to the April 4, 2011 redemption date during the
three months ended March 31, 2011. |
|
(g) |
|
ASC Subtopic 470-20 applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a net settlement
feature, which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled
either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. This guidance requires issuers of
convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion
to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the
issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The guidance impacted the historical accounting
for the 3.625% convertible senior notes due September 2011 and the 4.00% convertible senior
notes due December 2035, and resulted in increased interest expense of $359,000 and $1.1
million and $859,000 and $2.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. |
The following is a summary of short-term bank borrowings under UDRs bank credit facility at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period (1) |
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
31,750 |
|
Weighted average daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
169,023 |
|
|
|
161,260 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
433,000 |
|
|
|
337,600 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Interest rate at end of the period |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $2.6 million of letters of credit at September 30, 2011. |
19
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holder, and as such are presented
as if the holder will convert the debt instrument at the earliest available date. The aggregate
maturities of unsecured debt for the five years subsequent to September 30, 2011 are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
Lines |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2012 (a) |
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
99,386 |
|
|
|
461,386 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,885 |
|
|
|
221,885 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,930 |
|
|
|
311,930 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,744 |
|
|
|
324,744 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,716 |
|
|
|
647,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
362,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,605,661 |
|
|
$ |
1,967,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 16, Subsequent Events. |
We were in compliance with the covenants of our debt instruments at September 30, 2011.
In 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding debt securities of UDR, Inc.
These guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as primary obligor and not merely as
surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder of the applicable securities and
to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the respective indenture (a) the full and
punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all
obligations of the Company under the respective indenture whether for principal or interest on the
securities (and premium, if any), and all other monetary obligations of the Company under the
respective indenture and the terms of the applicable securities and (b) the full and punctual
performance within the applicable grace periods of all other obligations of the Company under the
respective indenture and the terms of applicable securities.
8. EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic and diluted loss per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the periods as the effect of adding stock options and other common
stock equivalents such as the non-vested restricted stock awards is anti-dilutive.
20
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the
periods presented (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Numerator for earnings per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(15,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for earnings per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
215,066 |
|
|
|
167,056 |
|
|
|
197,010 |
|
|
|
162,294 |
|
Non-vested restricted stock awards |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
|
213,816 |
|
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
|
195,723 |
|
|
|
160,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders- basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of the conversion of the OP Units, convertible preferred stock, convertible debt,
stock options and restricted stock is not dilutive and is therefore not included in the above
calculations as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations.
If the OP Units were converted to common stock, the additional weighted average common shares
outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 would be 8,235,068 and
6,987,415, and 5,615,619 and 5,850,432, respectively.
If the convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock, the additional shares of
common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 would be
3,035,548 weighted average common shares.
If the stock options and unvested restricted stock were converted to Common Stock, the
additional weighted average Common Shares outstanding using the treasury stock method would be a
2,156,175 and 2,107,783 and 2,425,654 and 2,209,025 weighted average common shares for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
9. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnerships
Interests in operating partnerships held by limited partners are represented by operating
partnership units (OP Units). The income is allocated to holders of OP Units based upon net
income attributable to common stockholders and the weighted average number of OP Units outstanding
to total common shares plus OP Units outstanding during the period. Capital contributions,
distributions, and profits and losses are allocated to non-controlling interests in accordance with
the terms of the individual partnership agreements.
Limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a
portion of the OP Units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form
of the Cash Amount as defined in the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership
(the Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units have been outstanding for at least one
year. UDR, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership may, in its sole discretion,
purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash Amount or the REIT Share
Amount (generally one share of common stock of the Company for each OP Unit), as defined in the
Partnership Agreement. Accordingly, the Company records the OP Units outside of permanent equity
and reports the OP Units at their redemption value using the Companys stock price at each balance
sheet date.
21
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The following table sets forth redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating
Partnership for the following period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
119,057 |
|
Mark to market adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling
interests in the OP |
|
|
(14,525 |
) |
Conversion of OP Units to Common Stock |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP |
|
|
(1,192 |
) |
OP units issued for partial consideration in community acquisition |
|
|
111,034 |
|
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP |
|
|
(5,070 |
) |
Allocation of other comprehensive (loss)/income |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the OP, September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
208,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following sets forth net loss attributable to common stockholders and transfers from
redeemable noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership for the following periods (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(15,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,537 |
) |
Conversion of OP units to UDR Common Stock |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7,769 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
8,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in equity from net loss attributable to common stockholders and conversion of OP units to
UDR Common Stock |
|
$ |
(15,498 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,544 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
Non-controlling interests represent interests of unrelated partners in certain consolidated
affiliates, and is presented as part of equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets since these
interests are not redeemable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $46,000 and $134,000 and $31,000 and
$111,000, respectively.
10. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price
that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable
inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
are described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs. |
22
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments either recorded or disclosed
on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at September 30, 2011 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (d) |
|
|
8,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,402 |
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
661,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661,031 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
949,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949,687 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
154,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,870 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,700 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,451 |
|
Unsecured debt instruments: (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial bank |
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,000 |
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
1,674,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,674,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
4,181,009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
4,165,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,380 |
|
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (d) |
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
306,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,515 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
927,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,413 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
405,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,641 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,700 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,450 |
|
Unsecured debt instruments: (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial bank |
|
|
31,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,750 |
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
1,625,492 |
|
|
|
264,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,677,845 |
|
|
$ |
264,849 |
|
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
|
$ |
3,406,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 6, Secured Debt |
|
(b) |
|
See Note 7, Unsecured Debt |
|
(c) |
|
See Note 11, Derivatives and Hedging Activity |
|
(d) |
|
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company accrued a liability of $6 million related to a
contingent purchase consideration on one of its properties. The contingent consideration was
determined based on the fair market value of the related asset which is estimated using Level
3 inputs utilized in a third party appraisal. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the
Company paid approximately $635,000 of the liability, and the outstanding balance is due
January 2012. The fair value of the contingent purchase consideration is also inclusive of $3
million accrued in relation to our acquisition of a development property in a consolidated
joint venture during the three months ended September 30, 2011. (See Note 5, Joint
Ventures.) |
Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest
rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation
of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
24
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of September
30, 2011 and 2010, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified
in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Redeemable non-controlling interests in the Operating Partnership have a redemption feature
and are marked to their redemption value. The redemption value is based on the fair value of the
Companys Common Stock at the redemption date, and therefore, is calculated based on the fair value
of the Companys Common Stock at the balance sheet date. Since the valuation is based on observable
inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, redeemable non-controlling
interests in the Operating Partnership are classified as Level 2.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
At September 30, 2011, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes
receivable, accounts receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable,
security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their
carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values
of other financial instruments were determined by the Company using available market information
and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market
data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize on the disposition of the financial
instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
We estimate the fair value of our debt instruments by discounting the remaining cash flows of
the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market credit spread plus the
corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a replacement market credit
spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit spreads, time remaining to
maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
We estimated the fair value of our Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes based on Level 1 inputs
which utilize quoted prices in active markets where we had the ability to access value for
identical liabilities.
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and
circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book
value of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to
reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding
periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair value. Our estimates of fair
value represent our best estimate based upon Level 3 inputs such as industry trends and reference
to market rates and transactions.
We consider various factors to determine if a decrease in the value of our investments in an
unconsolidated joint venture is other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited
to, age of the venture, our intent and ability to retain our investment in the entity, the
financial condition and long-term prospects of the entity, and the relationships with the other
joint venture partners and its lenders. Based on the significance of the unobservable inputs, we
classify these fair value measurements within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company did
not incur any other-than-temporary decrease in the value of its investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
After determining an other-than-temporary decrease in the value of an equity method investment
has occurred, we estimate the fair value of our investment by estimating the proceeds we would
receive upon a hypothetical liquidation of the investment at the date of measurement. Inputs
reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the investment
giving consideration to the terms of the joint venture agreement and the estimated discounted
future cash flows to be generated from the underlying joint venture assets. The inputs and
assumptions utilized to estimate the future cash flows of the underlying assets are based upon the
Companys evaluation of the economy, market trends, operating results, and other factors, including
judgments regarding costs to complete any construction activities, lease up and occupancy rates,
rental rates, inflation rates, capitalization rates utilized to estimate the projected cash flows
at the disposition, and discount rates.
25
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
11. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Specifically, the Company may enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that
arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain
cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Companys derivative
financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the
Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally
related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest
expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the
Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management
strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of
the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as
cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates
rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such
derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in
earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded
less than a $1,000 loss from ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index
mismatches between the derivative and the hedged item, and the fair value of interest rate swaps
that were not zero at inception of the hedging relationship.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Companys
variable-rate debt. Through September 30, 2012, the Company estimates that an additional
$7.0 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
26
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives
that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
633,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
119,504 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted
in losses of $52,000 and $16,000 and $468,000 and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following
outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships
(dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
327,484 |
|
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as
well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
6,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
Portion) |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
Income (Effective Portion) |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(7,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,751 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2,503 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,559 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(7,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,503 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(15,748 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,220 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(6,853 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,191 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(15,748 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,853 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Designated as Hedging |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Recognized in Income on Derivative |
|
Instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate products |
|
Other income/(expense) |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate products |
|
Other income/(expense) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision
where (1) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of
the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in
default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the Company could be declared in default on its
derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due
to the Companys default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the Companys agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions
where if there is a change in the Companys financial condition that materially changes the
Companys creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the Company may be required to fully collateralize
its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The Company also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan
and financial covenant provisions of the Companys indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the
derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would result in the
Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
28
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which
includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these
agreements was $16.2 million. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has not posted any collateral
related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at September 30,
2011, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their
termination value of $16.2 million.
12. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Components of other comprehensive loss during the three and nine months September 30, 2011 and
2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(13,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,443 |
) |
Change in equity due to non-controlling interests |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Gain on marketable securities reclassified to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(5,342 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(8,895 |
) |
|
|
(6,030 |
) |
Allocation to redeemable non-controlling interests |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(18,347 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,299 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized $2.6 million
and $7.7 million and $3.1 million and $9.1 million, respectively, as stock based compensation
expense, which is inclusive of awards granted to our outside directors.
29
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
Real Estate Under Development
The following summarizes the Companys real estate commitments at September 30, 2011 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Costs Incurred |
|
|
Expected Costs |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
to Date |
|
|
to Complete |
|
|
Stake |
|
Wholly owned under development |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
192,930 |
|
|
$ |
331,345 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
12,878 |
|
|
$ |
33,122 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35,991 |
|
|
|
144,909 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
241,799 |
|
|
$ |
509,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course
of business. The Company cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal
proceedings and claims at this time. The Company believes that such liability, to the extent not
provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
15. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
GAAP guidance requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief
operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such
segments performance. UDRs chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its
executive management team who use several generally accepted industry financial measures to assess
the performance of the business for our reportable operating segments.
UDR owns and operates multifamily apartment communities that generate rental and other
property related income through the leasing of apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The
primary financial measures for UDRs apartment communities are rental income and net operating
income (NOI). Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions,
vacancy loss and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating
expenses. UDRs chief operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit or
loss.
30
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
UDRs two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other communities:
|
|
|
Same communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to
July 1, 2010 and held as of September 30, 2011. A comparison of operating results from the
prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and
operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within
the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves
90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months. |
|
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or developed
in 2009, 2010 and 2011, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as
real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture
properties, properties managed by third parties and the non-apartment components of mixed
use properties. |
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community
and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the
aggregation criteria under GAAP as each of our apartment communities generally has similar economic
characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Companys reportable segments
have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is provided to the chief
operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of UDRs total revenues during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2011 and 2010.
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as
those described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. The following table details rental
income and NOI for UDRs reportable segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, and reconciles NOI to loss from continuing operations per the Consolidated Statements of
Operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
50,905 |
|
|
$ |
48,299 |
|
|
$ |
149,472 |
|
|
$ |
143,942 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
39,656 |
|
|
|
38,027 |
|
|
|
117,205 |
|
|
|
112,662 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
33,227 |
|
|
|
31,672 |
|
|
|
97,893 |
|
|
|
94,663 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
12,468 |
|
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
36,613 |
|
|
|
35,325 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
54,191 |
|
|
|
30,497 |
|
|
|
136,984 |
|
|
|
79,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated
rental income |
|
$ |
190,447 |
|
|
$ |
160,325 |
|
|
$ |
538,167 |
|
|
$ |
465,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
35,674 |
|
|
$ |
32,719 |
|
|
$ |
103,633 |
|
|
$ |
98,374 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
27,206 |
|
|
|
25,630 |
|
|
|
80,259 |
|
|
|
76,298 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
20,430 |
|
|
|
19,431 |
|
|
|
60,712 |
|
|
|
58,460 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
7,402 |
|
|
|
6,978 |
|
|
|
21,836 |
|
|
|
20,740 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
36,801 |
|
|
|
18,270 |
|
|
|
89,940 |
|
|
|
47,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI |
|
|
127,513 |
|
|
|
103,028 |
|
|
|
356,380 |
|
|
|
301,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
12,620 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
Property management |
|
|
(5,238 |
) |
|
|
(4,409 |
) |
|
|
(14,800 |
) |
|
|
(12,812 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
|
(4,342 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(96,554 |
) |
|
|
(75,591 |
) |
|
|
(271,830 |
) |
|
|
(221,524 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
(40,079 |
) |
|
|
(38,257 |
) |
|
|
(118,642 |
) |
|
|
(113,068 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(11,919 |
) |
|
|
(11,994 |
) |
|
|
(35,512 |
) |
|
|
(31,927 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
(3,012 |
) |
|
|
(3,755 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
Redeemable non-controlling interests in OP |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
Net gain on sale of depreciable property |
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
56,063 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR |
|
$ |
(13,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
UDR, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
The following table details the assets of UDRs reportable segments as of September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
2,102,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,088,128 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
1,272,802 |
|
|
|
1,264,314 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
1,061,706 |
|
|
|
1,054,130 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
464,615 |
|
|
|
461,014 |
|
Non-mature communities/Other |
|
|
3,325,980 |
|
|
|
2,013,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
8,227,264 |
|
|
|
6,881,347 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,804,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,638,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets net book value |
|
|
6,423,164 |
|
|
|
5,243,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
19,641 |
|
|
|
15,447 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
23,709 |
|
|
|
27,267 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
187,176 |
|
|
|
148,057 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
129,931 |
|
|
|
74,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
6,804,903 |
|
|
$ |
5,529,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures related to our same communities totaled $14.8 million and $35.0 million
and $11.4 million and $33.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. Capital expenditures related to our non-mature/other communities totaled $3.3
million and $5.7 million and $1.1 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i. |
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Seattle, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, San
Diego, Inland Empire, Sacramento, and Portland |
|
|
ii. |
|
Mid-Atlantic New York, Boston, Metropolitan DC, Richmond, Baltimore, Norfolk, and
Other Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
iii. |
|
Southeastern Tampa, Orlando, Nashville, Jacksonville, and Other Florida |
|
|
iv. |
|
Southwestern Dallas, Phoenix, Austin, and Houston |
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 25, 2011, the Company entered into a new $900 million unsecured revolving credit
facility, replacing the Companys $600 million facility. The new facility has an initial term of
four years and includes a one-year extension option, and contains an accordion feature that allows
the Company to increase the facility to $1.35 billion. Based on the Companys current credit
ratings, the credit facility carries an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 122.5 basis
points and a facility fee of 22.5 basis points.
32
[This
page is intentionally left blank.]
33
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
4,322,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,516,918 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(965,980 |
) |
|
|
(835,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,356,481 |
|
|
|
2,681,026 |
|
Real estate sold or held for sale
(net of accumulated depreciation of $0 and $48,191) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
3,356,481 |
|
|
|
2,822,101 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
10,782 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
45,894 |
|
|
|
22,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,426,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,861,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
1,260,891 |
|
|
$ |
1,014,459 |
|
Secured debt real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,602 |
|
Note payable due to General Partner |
|
|
83,771 |
|
|
|
78,271 |
|
Real estate taxes payable |
|
|
12,943 |
|
|
|
5,245 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent |
|
|
18,735 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
37,104 |
|
|
|
33,559 |
|
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
63,838 |
|
|
|
63,838 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
37,754 |
|
|
|
35,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,515,914 |
|
|
|
1,299,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating partnership units: 184,281,254 OP units outstanding at
September 30, 2011 and 179,909,408 at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner: 110,883 OP units outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners: 184,170,371 OP units outstanding at September 30,
2011 and 179,798,525 OP units outstanding at December
31, 2010 |
|
|
2,048,887 |
|
|
|
2,046,380 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,541 |
) |
|
|
(5,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
2,042,644 |
|
|
|
2,042,241 |
|
Receivable due from General Partner |
|
|
(144,503 |
) |
|
|
(492,709 |
) |
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
12,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
|
1,910,323 |
|
|
|
1,561,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital |
|
$ |
3,426,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,861,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
34
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
99,833 |
|
|
$ |
84,131 |
|
|
$ |
281,461 |
|
|
$ |
249,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
99,833 |
|
|
|
84,131 |
|
|
|
281,461 |
|
|
|
249,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance |
|
|
10,845 |
|
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
31,996 |
|
|
|
30,840 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
7,451 |
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
22,828 |
|
|
|
20,544 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
5,367 |
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
13,091 |
|
Repair and maintenance |
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
14,597 |
|
|
|
13,080 |
|
Administrative and marketing |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
5,961 |
|
|
|
5,117 |
|
Property management |
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
7,740 |
|
|
|
6,853 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
51,906 |
|
|
|
39,637 |
|
|
|
141,725 |
|
|
|
118,661 |
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on secured debt |
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
12,360 |
|
|
|
38,233 |
|
|
|
36,653 |
|
Interest on note payable due to General Partner |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
6,629 |
|
|
|
16,268 |
|
|
|
14,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
106,450 |
|
|
|
90,852 |
|
|
|
298,995 |
|
|
|
263,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(6,617 |
) |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
|
|
(17,534 |
) |
|
|
(14,045 |
) |
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
16,438 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
|
(6,600 |
) |
|
|
(6,836 |
) |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
(12,321 |
) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(6,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per OP unit- basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average OP units outstanding |
|
|
183,086 |
|
|
|
179,909 |
|
|
|
181,837 |
|
|
|
179,909 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
35
UNITED
DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc. |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
due from |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
General |
|
|
Controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
Limited Partner |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
41,199 |
|
|
$ |
77,858 |
|
|
$ |
1,927,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
(5,502 |
) |
|
$ |
2,042,241 |
|
|
$ |
(492,709 |
) |
|
$ |
12,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,561,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
(3,324 |
) |
|
|
(102,271 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Unit Redemptions for common shares of UDR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP Units issued for real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
Adjustment to reflect limited partners capital at
redemption value |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(15,425 |
) |
|
|
16,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in receivable due from General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
38,782 |
|
|
$ |
169,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
(7,541 |
) |
|
$ |
2,042,644 |
|
|
$ |
(144,503 |
) |
|
$ |
12,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,910,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
36
UNITED
DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(1,096 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,321 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
143,290 |
|
|
|
124,797 |
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
(16,055 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
Write off of bad debt |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
and other |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating assets |
|
|
(9,555 |
) |
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
Increase in operating liabilities |
|
|
7,957 |
|
|
|
13,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
127,483 |
|
|
|
126,768 |
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed) and initial
capital expenditures |
|
|
(283,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in nonmonetary asset exchange |
|
|
(15,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets,
net of escrow reimbursement |
|
|
(48,325 |
) |
|
|
(43,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(347,463 |
) |
|
|
(43,809 |
) |
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from/(payments to) General Partner |
|
|
254,919 |
|
|
|
(87,380 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt |
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
11,326 |
|
Payments on secured debt |
|
|
(25,655 |
) |
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
Payment of financing costs |
|
|
(3,128 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
OP unit redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
Distributions paid to partnership unitholders |
|
|
(5,070 |
) |
|
|
(4,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
223,140 |
|
|
|
(82,477 |
) |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
44,151 |
|
|
$ |
39,115 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties acquired, including intangibles in asset exchange |
|
|
178,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
Properties disposed in asset exchange, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
139,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
OP Units issued in partial consideration for property acquisition |
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt assumed in the acquisitions of properties, including asset exchange |
|
|
247,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt transferred in asset exchange |
|
|
55,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value adjustment of secured debt assumed in acquisitions of properties,
including asset exchange |
|
|
21,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
37
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (UDR, L.P., the Operating Partnership, we or our) is a
Delaware limited partnership, that owns, acquires, renovates, redevelops, manages, and disposes of
multifamily apartment communities generally located in high barrier-to-entry markets located in the
United States. The high barrier-to-entry markets are characterized by limited land for new
construction, difficult and lengthy entitlement process, expensive single-family home prices and
significant employment growth potential. UDR, L.P. is a subsidiary of UDR, Inc. (UDR or the
General Partner), a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, through which UDR
conducts a significant portion of its business. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2011, revenues of the Operating Partnership represented 52% and 53% of the General Partners
consolidated revenues, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
revenues of the Operating Partnership represented 55% and 57% of the General Partners consolidated
revenues. At September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnerships apartment portfolio consisted of 81
communities located in 21 markets consisting of 24,200 apartment homes.
Interests in UDR, L.P. are represented by operating partnership units (OP Units). The
Operating Partnerships net income is allocated to the partners, which is initially based on their
respective distributions made during the year and secondly, their percentage interests.
Distributions are made in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership Agreement), on a
per unit basis that is generally equal to the dividend per share on UDRs common stock, which is
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol UDR.
As of September 30, 2011, there were 184,281,254 OP Units outstanding, of which, 174,851,898
or 94.9% were owned by UDR and affiliated entities and 9,429,356 or 5.1% were owned by
non-affiliated limited partners. See Note 9, Capital Structure.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted
according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as of
September 30, 2011, and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim
results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full year.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December
31, 2010 included in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by UDR and the Operating Partnership
with the SEC on August 5, 2011.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated statements are presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts
realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the current financial statement presentation.
The Operating Partnership evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial
statements were issued. Except as disclosed in Note 13, Subsequent Event, no other recognized or
non-recognized subsequent events were noted.
38
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
Revenue and real estate sales gain recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in
accordance with FASB ASC 840, Leases and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. Rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis and recognized when earned. The
Operating Partnership recognizes interest income, management and other fees and incentives when
earned, fixed and determinable.
The Operating Partnership accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with FASB ASC
360-20, Real Estate Sales. For sale transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit
recognition, such as the Operating Partnership no longer having continuing involvement in the
property, we remove the related assets and liabilities from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and
record the gain or loss in the period the transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not
meet the full accrual sale criteria due to our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of
the continuing involvement and account for the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Non-monetary transactions are accounted for at fair value.
Sales to entities in which we or our General Partner retain or otherwise own an interest are
accounted for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full
accrual method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we
recognize profit proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and will defer the gain on the
interest we or our General Partner retain. The Operating Partnership will recognize any deferred
gain when the property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial
sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a
preference as to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow
preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of
the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Income taxes
The taxable income or loss of the Operating Partnership is reported on the tax returns of the
partners. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the accompanying financial statements for
federal or state income taxes on income that is passed through to the partners. However, any state
or local revenue, excise or franchise taxes that result from the operating activities of the
Operating Partnership are recorded at the entity level. The Operating Partnerships tax returns are
subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Net income for financial reporting
purposes differs from the net income for income tax reporting purposes primarily due to temporary
differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax deferral of certain gains on property
sales. The differences in depreciation result from differences in the book and tax basis of
certain real estate assets and the differences in the methods of depreciation and lives of the real
estate assets.
The Operating Partnership adopted certain accounting guidance within ASC Topic 740, Income
Taxes, with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the financial statements. The guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Operating Partnerships tax
returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would
be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management of the Operating
Partnership is required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations,
for all major jurisdictions, which include federal and certain states. The Operating Partnership
has no examinations in progress and none are expected at this time.
Management
of the General Partner has reviewed all open tax years (2007-2010)
and major jurisdictions and concluded the adoption of the new accounting guidance resulted in no impact to
the Operating Partnerships financial position or results of operations. There is no tax liability
resulting from unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain income tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in future tax returns.
39
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Earnings per OP unit
Basic earnings per OP Unit is computed by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to general
and limited partner units by the weighted average number of general and limited partner units
(including redeemable OP Units) outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per OP Unit reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if securities
or other contracts to issue OP Units were exercised or converted into OP Units or resulted in
the issuance of OP Units that shared in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. For the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no dilutive instruments outstanding,
and therefore, diluted earnings per OP Unit and basic earnings per OP Unit are the same.
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Operating Partnership consists of income producing operating
properties, properties held for sale, properties under development, and land held for future
development. At September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership owned and consolidated 81
communities in 8 states plus the District of Columbia totaling 24,200 apartment homes. The
following table summarizes the carrying amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of September
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,063,276 |
|
|
$ |
925,326 |
|
Depreciable property held and used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
3,109,501 |
|
|
|
2,452,746 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
121,804 |
|
|
|
112,831 |
|
Sold or held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,598 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,175 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
Under development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
16,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
9,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
Land held for future development |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
26,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
|
4,322,461 |
|
|
|
3,706,184 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(965,980 |
) |
|
|
(884,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned, net |
|
$ |
3,356,481 |
|
|
$ |
2,822,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Operating Partnerships real estate community
acquisitions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
Property Name |
|
Market |
|
Acquisition Date |
|
Units |
|
|
Price (a) |
|
10 Hanover Square |
|
New York, NY |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
493 |
|
|
$ |
259,750 |
|
14 North |
|
Boston, MA |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
64,500 |
|
Inwood West |
|
Boston, MA |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
95 Wall |
|
New York, NY |
|
August 2011 |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
328,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
$ |
761,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The purchase price is the contractual sales price by the Operating Partnership and the
third party and does not include any costs that the Operating Partnership incurred in the
pursuit of the property or the recorded difference between the agreed upon
value and the fair value of the OP Units issued as part of the
consideration paid. |
In
August 2011, UDR, through the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of 95 Wall. The community
was acquired for $328.9 million, which included the issuance of 1,802,239 OP Units of the Operating
Partnership. The OP Units were deemed to have an agreed upon value equal to the
greater of $25.00 or the volume weighted average
closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10 day period ended on (and
including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting
purposes, the fair value of these OP units was $26.71 at the
settlement date.
On April 1, 2011, UDR, through the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of 10
Hanover Square. The community was acquired for $259.8 million, which included assumed debt
with a fair value of $208.1 million, and the issuance of 2,569,606 OP Units of the
Operating Partnership. The OP Units were deemed to have an agreed
upon value equal to the greater of $25.00
or the volume weighted average closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10 day period ended on (and
including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting
purposes, the fair value of these OP units was $24.47 at the
settlement date.
On April 5, 2011, UDR and the Operating Partnership completed a $500 million asset exchange
with an unaffiliated third party whereby UDR acquired 388 Beale, and the Operating Partnership
acquired 14 North, and Inwood West. The communities acquired were valued at $263.0 million
representing their estimated fair value. The Company and the Operating Partnership paid $28.1
million of cash and assumed debt with a fair value of $61.7 million. UDR sold
two multifamily apartment communities (434 homes) and the Operating Partnership sold four
multifamily apartment communities (984 homes) located in California as part of the transaction.
(See Note 4, Discontinued Operations, for further discussion of real estate community
dispositions.)
The Operating Partnership allocates the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair value. When allocating cost to an acquired
community, the Operating Partnership first allocates costs to the estimated intangible value of the
existing lease agreements and then to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures
assuming the community is vacant. The primary, although not only, identifiable intangible asset
associated with our portfolio is the value of existing lease agreements. The Operating Partnership
estimates the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated
with a hypothetical lease-up.
Total acquisition cost of the communities, including of the difference
between the agreed upon value of the
OP Units and the fair value of the OP Units issued at the acquisition date (if
applicable), was allocated $130.8 million to land; $621.2 million to buildings and improvements;
$3.5 million to furniture, fixtures, and equipment;
$30.5 million to intangible assets; $1.3
million to intangible below market lease liabilities; and $269.7
million of assumed debt.
Operating revenues and loss from operations of the acquired properties included in the
Operating Partnerships results of operations from the acquisition dates to September 30, 2011 were
$19.0 million and $13.8 million, respectively.
41
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The unaudited pro forma information below summarizes the Operating Partnerships combined
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 as though the
above acquisitions were completed on January 1, 2010. The information for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011 includes pro forma results for the portion of the period prior to the
acquisition date and actual results from the date of acquisition through the end of the period. The
supplemental pro forma operating data is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of
operations would have been assuming the transaction had been completed as set forth above, nor do
they purport to represent the Operating Partnerships results of operations for future periods (in
thousands except for per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Pro forma revenues |
|
$ |
103,214 |
|
|
$ |
96,750 |
|
|
$ |
304,285 |
|
|
$ |
290,588 |
|
Pro forma loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
|
(6,529 |
) |
|
|
(6,851 |
) |
|
|
(7,801 |
) |
|
|
(20,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per OP unit- basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share- diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
The Operating Partnership did not have any acquisitions during the nine months ended September
30, 2010.
The Operating Partnership incurred $194,000 and $2.3 million of acquisition related costs
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The Operating Partnership
did not incur any acquisition costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
These expenses are classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations line item entitled
General and administrative.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that the Operating Partnership has either sold or
which management believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be
classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations, a propertys operations and
cash flows have or will be divested to a third party by the Operating Partnership whereby the
Operating Partnership will not have any significant continuing involvement in the ownership or
operation of the property after the sale or disposition. The results of operations of the property
are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented and do not impact the net
earnings reported by the Operating Partnership. Once a property is deemed as held for sale,
depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Operating Partnership determines that the
property no longer meets the criteria of held for sale, the Operating Partnership will recapture
any unrecorded depreciation for the property. The assets and liabilities of properties deemed as
held for sale are presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Properties deemed as
held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less
the costs to sell the assets.
As discussed in Note 3, Real Estate Owned, in conjunction with the asset exchange that closed
on April 5, 2011, the Operating Partnership sold four multifamily apartment communities (984
homes). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership
recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $17,000 and $16.1 million on these
transactions, which are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations for the
following properties are classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item
entitled Income from discontinued operations.
42
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The
Operating Partnership had no apartment homes classified as held for
sale at
September 30, 2011. The Operating Partnership did not dispose of any communities during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,091 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
|
$ |
12,342 |
|
Non-Property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
14,191 |
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
Property management fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Real estate depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
12,591 |
|
|
Income before net gain on the sale of
property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Net gain on the sale of property |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16,055 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
$ |
16,438 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification in the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Operating Partnership
having effectively established the fixed interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured
debt consists of the following as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Communities |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
Encumbered |
|
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
459,535 |
|
|
$ |
192,205 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
560,993 |
|
|
|
560,993 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt |
|
|
1,020,528 |
|
|
|
766,523 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
37,415 |
|
|
|
100,590 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt |
|
|
240,363 |
|
|
|
303,538 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt |
|
$ |
1,260,891 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,061 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2011, the General Partner had secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae
with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit
facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and
certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General
Partners option. At September 30, 2011, $895.2 million of the outstanding balance was fixed at a
weighted average interest rate of 5.32% and the remaining balance of $260.5 million on these
facilities had a weighted average variable interest rate of 1.61%. $736.9 million of these credit
facilities were allocated to the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2011 based on the ownership
of the assets securing the debt. Following is information related to the credit facilities
allocated to the Operating Partnership:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Borrowings outstanding |
|
$ |
736,941 |
|
|
$ |
736,941 |
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
737,529 |
|
|
|
763,040 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period |
|
|
738,135 |
|
|
|
770,021 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
The Operating Partnership may from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt
instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair
value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life
of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair value adjustment of the fixed rate debt
instruments on the Operating Partnerships properties was a net premium/(discount) of $18.8 million
and ($1.1 million) at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from December 2012 through May
2019 and carry interest rates ranging from 3.43% to 5.94%.
Secured credit facilities. At September 30, 2011, the General Partner had borrowings against
its fixed rate facilities of $895.2 million of which $561.0 million was allocated to the Operating
Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of September 30, 2011, the
fixed rate Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the Operating Partnership had a weighted
average fixed interest rate of 5.21%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature on July 2013. Interest on the variable rate
mortgage notes is based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which translated into interest rate of
1.04% at September 30, 2011.
Tax-exempt secured note payable. The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures
tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly
installments. The mortgage note payable has an interest rate of 0.70% as of September 30, 2011.
Secured credit facilities. At September 30, 2011, the General Partner had borrowings against
its variable rate facilities of $260.5 million of which $175.9 million was allocated to the
Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing the debt. As of September 30,
2011, the variable rate borrowings under the Fannie Mae credit facilities allocated to the
Operating Partnership had a weighted average floating interest rate of 1.86%.
44
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The aggregate maturities of the Operating Partnerships secured debt due during each of the
next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,886 |
|
|
$ |
32,724 |
|
2012 |
|
|
54,472 |
|
|
|
136,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,529 |
|
|
|
250,793 |
|
2013 |
|
|
16,551 |
|
|
|
27,739 |
|
|
|
37,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,705 |
|
2014 |
|
|
8,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,342 |
|
2015 |
|
|
193,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,205 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
185,127 |
|
|
|
396,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
85,533 |
|
|
|
694,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
459,535 |
|
|
$ |
560,993 |
|
|
$ |
37,415 |
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,260,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor on Unsecured Debt
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners unsecured credit facility,
with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million, a $250 million term loan due January 2016, a
$100 million term loan due December 2013, and $300 million of medium-term notes due June 2018. At
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance under the unsecured credit
facility was $362.0 million and $31.8 million, respectively. See Note 13, Subsequent Event.
On September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding debt
securities of the General Partner. These guarantees provide that the Operating Partnership, as
primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees to each holder
of the applicable securities and to the trustee and their successors and assigns under the
respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by
acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture
whether for principal or interest on the securities (and premium, if any), and all other monetary
obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of the applicable
securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the applicable grace periods of all
other obligations of the General Partner under the respective indenture and the terms of applicable
securities.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Receivable due from the General Partner
The Operating Partnership participates in the General Partners central cash management
program, wherein all the Operating Partnerships cash receipts are remitted to the General Partner
and all cash disbursements are funded by the General Partner. In addition, other miscellaneous
costs such as administrative expenses are incurred by the General Partner on behalf of the
Operating Partnership. As a result of these various transactions between the Operating Partnership
and the General Partner, the Operating Partnership had net receivable balances of $144.5 million
and $492.7 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is reflected as
a reduction of capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allocation of General and Administrative Expenses
The General Partner provides various general and administrative and other overhead services
for the Operating Partnership including legal assistance, acquisitions analysis, marketing and
advertising, and allocates these expenses to the Operating Partnership first on the basis of direct
usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated based on its pro-rata portion of UDRs total
apartment homes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the general
and administrative expenses allocated to the Operating Partnership by UDR were $11.6
million and $25.2 million and $10.7 million and $25.8 million, respectively, and are included
in General and Administrative and Property Management expenses on the consolidated statements
of operations. In the opinion of management, this method of allocation reflects the level of
services received by the Operating Partnership from the General Partner.
45
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Guaranties by the General Partner
The Operating Partnership provided a bottom dollar guaranty to certain limited partners as
part of their original contribution to the Operating Partnership. The guaranty protects the tax
basis of the underlying contribution and is reflected on the OP unitholders Schedule K-1 tax form.
The guaranty was made in the form of a
note payable issued by the Operating Partnership to the General
Partner at an annual interest rate of 1.14% at September 30, 2011 and 0.593% at December 31, 2010. Interest
payments are made monthly and the note is due December 31, 2011. At September 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, the note payable due to the General Partner was $78.3 million.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership also provided a
guaranty in conjunction with 1,802,239 OP Units issued in partial consideration to the
seller for the acquisition of an operating community. The guaranty was made in the form of a note
payable issued by the Operating Partnership to the General
Partner at an annual interest rate of 5.337%.
Interest payments are due monthly and the note matures on August 31, 2021. At issuance and at
September 30, 2011, the note payable due to the General Partner was $5.5 million.
7. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price
that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable
inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
are described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs. |
46
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The estimated fair values of the Operating Partnerships financial instruments either recorded
or disclosed on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at September 30, 2011 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (c) |
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
496,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,581 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
585,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,292 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
37,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,415 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,334,632 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,327,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
5,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (c) |
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
205,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,750 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
576,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576,069 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
100,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,590 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,109,755 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 5, Debt |
|
(b) |
|
See Note 8, Derivatives and Hedging Activity |
|
(c) |
|
During the first quarter of 2010, the Operating Partnership accrued a liability of $6.0
million related to a contingent purchase consideration on one of its properties. The
contingent consideration was determined based on the fair market value of the related asset
which is estimated using Level 3 inputs utilized in a third party appraisal. During the year
ended December 31, 2010, the Company paid approximately $635,000 of the liability, and the
outstanding balance is due January 2012. |
Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest
rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation
of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
The Operating Partnership incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect
both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair
value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Operating Partnership has considered the impact of netting and any
applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and
guarantees.
48
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Although the Operating Partnership has determined that the majority of the inputs used to
value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation
adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current
credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as
of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Operating Partnership has assessed the
significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its
derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant
to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Operating Partnership has determined
that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
At September 30, 2011, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and
prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because
of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial
instruments were determined by the Operating Partnership using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data
and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Operating Partnership would realize on the disposition of the
financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have
a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The General Partner estimates the fair value of our debt instruments by discounting the
remaining cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market
credit spread plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a
replacement market credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit
spreads, time remaining to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
The Operating Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations
when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less
than the net book value of those assets. Cash flow estimates are based upon historical results
adjusted to reflect managements best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our
estimated holding periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair value. The
General Partners estimates of fair value represent managements estimates based upon Level 3
inputs such as industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.
8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Operating Partnership is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations
and economic conditions. The General Partner principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of
business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The General
Partner manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by
managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative
financial instruments. Specifically, the General Partner enters into derivative financial
instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or
payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest
rates. The General Partners and the Operating Partnerships derivative financial instruments are
used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the General Partners known or
expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the General
Partners investments and borrowings.
49
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The General Partners objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to
interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this
objective, the General Partner primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the
receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the General Partner making
fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional
amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in
exchange for an up front premium.
A portion of the General Partners interest rate derivatives have been allocated to the
Operating Partnership based on the General Partners underlying debt instruments allocated to the
Operating Partnership. (See Note 5, Debt.)
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such
derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in
earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Operating
Partnership recorded less than $1,000 of ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and
index mismatches between the derivative and the hedged item.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the General Partners
variable-rate debt that is allocated to the Operating Partnership. During the next twelve months
through September 30, 2012, we estimate that an additional $3.3 million will be reclassified as an
increase to interest expense.
As of September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership had the following outstanding interest
rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollar amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
261,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
108,628 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements of FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted
in losses of $33,000 and $149,000 and $87,000 and $762,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, we had the following outstanding derivatives that were not
designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
217,173 |
|
50
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Operating Partnerships derivative financial
instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
$ |
5,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
$ |
5,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
The tables below present the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
from Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
Income |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging |
|
OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) |
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September
30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(2,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,210 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(1,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(5,659 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,061 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(3,620 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5,659 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,620 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
in Income on Derivative |
|
Instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
(762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
(762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The General Partner has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a
provision where (1) if the General Partner defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default
where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the General
Partner could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the General Partner
could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying
indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the General Partners default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the General Partner s agreements with its derivative counterparties contain
provisions where if there is a change in the General Partners financial condition that materially
changes the General Partner s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the General Partner may be
required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The General Partner also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the
loan and financial covenant provisions of the General Partners indebtedness with a lender
affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would
result in the General Partner being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by
the agreement.
As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position that were
allocated to the Operating Partnership, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment
for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $7.4 million. As of September 30, 2011,
the General Partner has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the General
Partner had breached any of these provisions at September 30, 2011, it would have been required to
settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $7.4 million.
9. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
General Partnership Units
The General Partner has complete discretion to manage and control the operations and business
of the Operating Partnership, which includes but is not limited to the acquisition and disposition
of real property, construction of buildings and making capital improvements, and the borrowing of
funds from outside lenders or UDR and its subsidiaries to finance such activities. The General
Partner can generally authorize, issue, sell, redeem or purchase any OP Unit or securities of the
Operating Partnership without the approval of the limited partners. The General Partner can also
approve, with regard to the issuances of OP units, the class or one or more series of classes, with
designations, preferences, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties
including rights, powers and duties senior to limited partnership interests without approval of any
limited partners except holder of Class A Partnership Units. There were 110,883 General Partnership
units outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all of which were held by UDR.
52
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Limited Partnership Units
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were 184,170,371 and 179,798,525 limited
partnership units outstanding, of which 1,751,671 were Class A Limited Partnership units. UDR owned
174,741,015 or 94.9% at September 30, 2011 and 174,736,557 or 97.2% at December 31, 2010,
respectively. The remaining 9,429,356 or 5.1% and 5,061,968 or 2.8% OP Units outstanding were held
by non-affiliated partners at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of which
1,751,671 were Class A Limited Partnership units.
The limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a
portion of the OP Units held by the limited partner at a redemption price equal to and in the form
of the Cash Amount (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), provided that such OP Units
have been outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as general partner of the Operating Partnership
may, in its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash
Amount or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of UDR for each OP Unit), as
defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement.
The non-affiliated limited partners capital is adjusted to redemption value at the end of
each reporting period with the corresponding offset against UDRs limited partner capital account
based on the redemption rights noted above. The aggregate value upon redemption of the
then-outstanding OP Units held by limited partners was $208.8 million and $119.1 million as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, based on the value of UDRs common stock at
each period end. A limited partner has no right to receive any distributions from the Operating
Partnership on or after the date of redemption of its OP Units.
Class A Limited Partnership Units
Class A Partnership units have a cumulative, annual, non-compounded preferred return, which is
equal to 8% based on a value of $16.61 per Class A Partnership unit.
Holders of the Class A Partnership Units exclusively possess certain voting rights. The
Operating Partnership may not do the following without approval of the holders of the Class A
Partnership Units: (i) increase the authorized or issued amount of Class A Partnership Units, (ii)
reclassify any other partnership interest into Class A Partnership Units, (iii) create, authorize
or issue any obligations or security convertible into or the right to purchase any Class
Partnership units, without the approval of the holders of the Class A Partnership Units, (iv) enter
into a merger or acquisition, or (v) amend or modify the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Operating Partnership in a manner that adversely affects the relative rights, preferences or
privileges of the Class A Partnership Units.
Allocation of profits and losses
Profit of the Operating Partnership is allocated in the following order: (i) to the General
Partner and the Limited Partners in proportion to and up to the amount of cash distributions made
during the year, and (ii) to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their
percentage interests. Losses and depreciation and amortization expenses, non-recourse liabilities
are allocated to the General Partner and Limited Partners in accordance with their percentage
interests. Losses allocated to the Limited Partners are capped to the extent that such an
allocation would not cause a deficit in the Limited Partners capital account. Such losses are,
therefore, allocated to the General Partner. If any Partners capital balance were to fall into a
deficit any income and gains are allocated to each Partner sufficient to eliminate its negative
capital balance.
53
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
10.
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Components of other comprehensive income/(loss) during the three and nine months September 30,
2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Other
comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(6,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,365 |
) |
Net income attributable to
non-controlling interests |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Change in unrealized loss on derivative
financial instruments |
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,903 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(5,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(8,182 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,739 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,135 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
The Operating Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business. The Operating Partnership cannot determine the ultimate liability with
respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. The General Partner believes that such
liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material
adverse effect on the Operating Partnerships financial condition, results of operations or cash
flow.
12. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, requires that segment disclosures present the
measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for
purposes of assessing such segments performance. The Operating Partnership has the same chief
operating decision maker as that of its parent, the General Partner. The chief operating decision
maker consists of several members of UDRs executive management team who use several generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for our reportable
operating segments.
The Operating Partnership owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the
United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of
apartment homes to a diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures of the Operating
Partnerships apartment communities are rental income and net operating income (NOI), and are
included in the chief operating decision makers assessment of UDRs performance on a consolidated
basis. Rental income represents gross market rent less adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss
and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less direct property operating expenses. The chief
operating decision maker of the General Partner utilizes NOI as the key measure of segment profit
or loss.
54
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The Operating Partnerships two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other
communities:
|
|
|
Same communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to
July 1, 2011 and held as of September 30, 2011. A comparison of operating results from the
prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and
operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within
the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves
90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months. |
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or developed
in 2009, 2010, or 2011 sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as
real estate held for sale, condominium conversion properties, joint venture properties,
properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of mixed use
properties. |
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community
and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the
aggregation criteria of Topic 280 as each of our apartment communities generally has similar
economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Operating Partnerships
reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnerships total revenues during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
55
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as
those described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. The following table details rental
income and NOI for the Operating Partnerships reportable segments for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing and discontinued
operations per the consolidated statement of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
43,226 |
|
|
$ |
40,938 |
|
|
$ |
126,712 |
|
|
$ |
121,896 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
47,806 |
|
|
|
45,694 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
10,817 |
|
|
|
10,231 |
|
|
|
31,858 |
|
|
|
30,611 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
20,539 |
|
|
|
19,788 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
22,618 |
|
|
|
14,965 |
|
|
|
58,880 |
|
|
|
43,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental income |
|
$ |
99,833 |
|
|
$ |
88,222 |
|
|
$ |
285,795 |
|
|
$ |
261,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
30,337 |
|
|
$ |
27,824 |
|
|
$ |
88,181 |
|
|
$ |
83,549 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
11,078 |
|
|
|
10,495 |
|
|
|
32,838 |
|
|
|
30,994 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
19,792 |
|
|
|
19,061 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
12,106 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
16,316 |
|
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
40,503 |
|
|
|
29,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI |
|
|
68,774 |
|
|
|
58,285 |
|
|
|
194,210 |
|
|
|
175,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
Property management |
|
|
(2,745 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
(7,859 |
) |
|
|
(7,192 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(4,203 |
) |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(51,906 |
) |
|
|
(41,674 |
) |
|
|
(143,289 |
) |
|
|
(124,797 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
(13,948 |
) |
|
|
(13,240 |
) |
|
|
(39,742 |
) |
|
|
(39,281 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
|
|
(6,629 |
) |
|
|
(16,268 |
) |
|
|
(14,123 |
) |
Net gain on the sale of real estate |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16,055 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unit holders |
|
$ |
(6,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
The following table details the assets of the Operating Partnerships reportable segments
as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
1,717,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,704,338 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
696,016 |
|
|
|
693,564 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
358,109 |
|
|
|
354,861 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
256,400 |
|
|
|
254,485 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
1,294,676 |
|
|
|
698,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
4,322,461 |
|
|
|
3,706,184 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(965,980 |
) |
|
|
(884,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets -
net book value |
|
|
3,356,481 |
|
|
|
2,822,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
10,782 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
45,894 |
|
|
|
22,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
3,426,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,861,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnerships same communities totaled $7.7
million and $19.8 and $5.4 million and $17.8 million for the three months and nine ended September
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Capital expenditures related to the Operating Partnerships
non-mature/other communities totaled $683,000 and $1.4 million and $405,000 and $1.4 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i. |
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle,
Sacramento, Inland Empire, Portland, and San Diego |
|
|
ii. |
|
Mid-Atlantic New York, Boston, Metropolitan DC and Baltimore |
|
|
iii. |
|
Southeastern Nashville, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Other Florida |
|
|
iv. |
|
Southwestern Dallas and Phoenix |
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 25, 2011, the Operating Partnership issued a guarantee in conjunction with a new
$900 million unsecured revolving credit facility entered into by our General Partner. The new
facility replaces the General Partners $600 million facility.
57
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and
dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent
growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, unanticipated
adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the real estate
markets and general and local economies and business conditions.
The following factors, among others, could cause our future results to differ materially from
those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely affect
occupancy levels and rental rates; |
|
|
|
|
the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results; |
|
|
|
|
possible difficulty in selling apartment communities; |
|
|
|
|
competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase or maintain
rents; |
|
|
|
|
insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing risk; |
|
|
|
|
failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments and
distributions to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
development and construction risks that may impact our profitability; |
|
|
|
|
potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other weather-related events,
which could result in substantial costs to us; |
|
|
|
|
risks from extraordinary losses for which we may not have insurance or adequate reserves; |
|
|
|
|
uninsured losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insurance retention, uninsured claims or
casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage; |
|
|
|
|
delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to succeed in new markets; |
|
|
|
|
changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs and affect the market price of our
securities; |
|
|
|
|
potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in substantial costs to
us; |
58
|
|
|
the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code in any taxable
year; |
|
|
|
|
our internal control over financial reporting may not be considered effective which could result
in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports, and in turn have an adverse effect on
our stock price; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in real estate laws, tax laws and other laws affecting our business. |
A discussion of these and other factors affecting our business and prospects is set forth in
Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors. We encourage investors to review these risk factors.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained
herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements
included in this Report may not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties
inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions
described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of
the date of this Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or
revise any forward-looking statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations
with regard thereto, or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such
statement is based, except to the extent otherwise required by law.
UDR, INC.:
Business Overview
UDR, Inc. is a self- administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires,
renovates, develops, and manages apartment communities. We were formed in 1972 as a Virginia
corporation. In September 2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland.
Our subsidiaries include an operating partnership United Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Report to we, us,
our, the Company, or UDR refer collectively to UDR, Inc., its subsidiaries and its
consolidated joint ventures.
At September 30, 2011, our consolidated real estate portfolio included 172 communities with
49,674 apartment homes and our total real estate portfolio, inclusive of our unconsolidated
communities, included an additional 38 communities with 10,108 apartment homes.
59
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of
September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
Same Communities |
|
Communities |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Co, CA |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
$ |
522,478 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
382,122 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
% |
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
2,042 |
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
153,625 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
1,103 |
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
292,835 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,922 |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
100,184 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,294 |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
360,465 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
1,231 |
|
Inland Empire, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
151,381 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
1,254 |
|
Sacramento, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
68,807 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
|
884 |
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
70,264 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
664,542 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
1,656 |
|
Richmond, VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
188,792 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
1,045 |
|
Baltimore, MD |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
254,002 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
% |
|
|
1,310 |
|
Norfolk VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
85,458 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
978 |
|
Other Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
80,008 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
334,793 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
978 |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
273,678 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
914 |
|
Nashville, TN |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
181,976 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
% |
|
|
887 |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
158,183 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
% |
|
|
843 |
|
Other Florida |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
113,076 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
282,274 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
% |
|
|
942 |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
121,963 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
% |
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
894 |
|
Austin, TX |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
60,378 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average Same Communities |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
39,567 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
|
4,901,284 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Matures, Commercial Properties & Other |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
9,962 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
3,133,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Held for Investment |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
49,529 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
% |
|
|
8,034,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Under Development (c) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
192,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
49,674 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
8,227,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,804,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned, Net of Accumulated
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,423,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The same community population for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes 39,030
homes. |
|
(b) |
|
Total Income per Occupied Home represents total monthly revenues divided by the product of
occupancy and the number of mature apartment homes. |
|
(c) |
|
The Company is currently developing six wholly-owned communities with 1,641 apartment homes,
145 of which have been completed. |
We report in two segments: Same Communities and Non-Mature/Other Communities. Our Same
Communities segment includes those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to July 1,
2010 and held as of September 30, 2011. These communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy
and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within the
current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy
for at least three consecutive months. Our Non-Mature/Other Communities segment includes those
communities that were acquired or developed in 2010 or 2011, sold properties, redevelopment
properties, properties classified as real estate held for sale, condominium conversion properties,
joint venture properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of
mixed use properties.
60
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through
operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of debt and equity. Both the
coordination of asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to
the maintenance of liquidity. Our primary source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations as
determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of
apartment homes and borrowings under credit agreements. We routinely use our unsecured credit
facility to temporarily fund certain investing and financing activities prior to arranging for
longer-term financing or the issuance of equity or debt securities. Historically, proceeds from the
sale of real estate have been used for both investing and financing activities as we repositioned
our portfolio.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations and borrowings under credit agreements. We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity
requirements such as scheduled debt maturities, the repayment of financing on development
activities, and potential property acquisitions, through secured and unsecured borrowings, the
issuance of debt or equity securities, and the disposition of properties. We believe that our net
cash provided by operations and borrowings under credit agreements will continue to be adequate to
meet both operating requirements and the payment of dividends by the Company in accordance with
REIT requirements. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements and renovations of certain
properties are expected to be funded from property operations, borrowings under credit agreements,
and the issuance of debt or equity securities, and dispositions of properties.
We have a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC which provides for the issuance of an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock,
guarantees of debt securities, warrants, subscription rights, purchase contracts and units to
facilitate future financing activities in the public capital markets. Access to capital markets is
dependent on market conditions at the time of issuance.
In September 2009, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement under which the
Company may offer and sell up to 15 million shares of its common stock over time to or through its
sales agents. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we sold 4,395,601 shares of common
stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $104.5 million at a
weighted average price per share of $23.78. Aggregate net proceeds from such sales, after deducting
related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of approximately $2.1 million,
were approximately $102.4 million.
In March 2011, the Company entered into a new equity distribution agreement under which
the Company may offer and sell up to 20 million shares of its common stock over time to or through
its sales agents. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we sold 1,720,999 shares of
common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $43.7 million at a
weighted average price per share of $25.41. Aggregate net proceeds from such sales, after deducting
related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of approximately $875,000, were
approximately $42.9 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we sold 10,800,343
shares of common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $271.3
million at a weighted average price per share of $25.12. Aggregate net proceeds from such sales,
after deducting related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of approximately
$5.5 million, were approximately $265.8 million. In September 2011, the Company entered into a new
equity distribution agreement in connection with filing a new registration statement on Form S-3.
The new equity distribution agreement replaced the March 2011 agreement, and no material changes
were made to the equity distribution agreement.
In July 2011, the Company closed on a public offering of 20,700,000 shares of its common
stock, including 2,700,000 shares sold as a result of the underwriters exercise of their
overallotment option in full at the closing, at a price of $25.00 per share, for net proceeds of
approximately $496.3 million after underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses.
Proceeds from the sale of shares through these programs are expected to fund potential and
recent acquisitions, for working capital, and for general corporate purposes.
61
Future Capital Needs
Future development and redevelopment expenditures may be funded through
unsecured or secured credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of equity or debt securities,
the sale of properties and to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided by operating activities.
Acquisition activity in strategic markets may be funded through
joint ventures, by the reinvestment of
proceeds from the sale of properties, through the issuance of equity or debt securities, the
issuance of operating partnership units, and the assumption or placement of secured and/or
unsecured debt.
During the remainder of 2011, we have approximately $3.1 million of secured debt maturing,
inclusive of principal amortization and net of extension rights of $81.6 million and $0 of
unsecured debt maturing. We anticipate repaying that debt with cash flow from our operations,
proceeds from debt and equity offerings, proceeds from the sale of properties, and by exercising
extension rights with respect to the secured debt.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting of our
financial condition and results and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. These
policies include those related to (1) capital expenditures, (2) impairment of long-lived assets,
(3) real estate investment properties, and (4) revenue recognition.
Our other critical accounting policies are described in more detail in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in UDRs
Current Report on Form 8-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on August 5,
2011. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies from those
reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 5, 2011. With respect to these critical
accounting policies, we believe that the application of judgments and assessments is consistently
applied and produces financial information that fairly depicts the results of operations for all
periods presented.
Statements of Cash Flow
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities,
net cash used in investing activities, and net cash provided by financing activities that are
presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Operating Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net cash flow provided by operating
activities was $182.9 million compared to $157.5 million for the comparable period in 2010. The
increase in cash flow from operating activities is primarily due to an increase in property net
operating income.
Investing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities was $1.1
billion compared to $478.8 million for the comparable period in 2010. The change in cash used for
investing activities was due to changes in the level of investment activities, which reflect our
strategy as it relates to acquisitions, dispositions, capital expenditures, and development
activities, all of which are discussed in further detail throughout this Report.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
In April 2011, the Company, through the Operating Partnership, closed on an acquisition of a
493-home multifamily apartment community referred to as 10 Hanover Square, located in New York
City, New York. The community was acquired for $259.8 million, which included assumed debt
with a fair value of $208.1 million and the issuance of 2,569,606 OP Units.
The OP Units were deemed to have a value equal to the greater of $25.00 or the volume weighted
average closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10-day period ended on (and
including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting
purposes, the fair value of these OP units was $24.47 at the
settlement date.
62
In April 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership completed a $500 million asset
exchange whereby UDR acquired one multifamily apartment community (227 homes), and the Operating
Partnership acquired two multifamily apartment communities (833 homes). The acquired assets are:
388 Beale in San Francisco, CA (227 homes); 14 North in Peabody, MA (387 homes); and Inwood West in
Woburn, MA (446 homes). The communities acquired were valued at $263.0 million representing their
estimated fair value. The Company paid $28.1 million of cash and assumed debt of $55.8 million
(with a fair value of $61.7 million). UDR sold two multifamily apartment communities (434 homes)
and the Operating Partnership sold four multifamily apartment communities (984 homes) located in
California as part of the transaction. The communities are: Crest at Phillips Ranch, Villas at San
Dimas, Villas at Bonita, The Arboretum, Rancho Vallecitos and Milazzo.
In August 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of
95 Wall. The community was acquired for $328.9 million, which included the issuance of 1,802,239 OP
Units of the Operating Partnership. The OP Units were deemed to have a value equal to the
greater of $25.00 or the volume weighted average
closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10-day
period ended on (and including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For
purchase price accounting purposes, the fair value of these OP units
was $26.71 at the settlement date.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company also acquired with cash and/or
assumed debt the following multifamily apartment communities:
|
|
|
View 14, a 185- home community located in Metropolitan, D.C. for $105.5 million; |
|
|
|
Rivergate, a 706- home community located in New York, New York for $443.4 million;
and |
|
|
|
21 Chelsea, a 210- home community located in New York, New York for $138.9 million. |
In May 2011, the Company sold an apartment community with 289 homes, and in September 2011,
the Company sold two communities with 450 homes located in Dallas, Texas.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired five apartment
communities located in Orange County, CA; Baltimore, MD; Los Angeles, CA; and Boston, MA for a
purchase price of $412.0 million. During the same periods, the Company also acquired land located
in San Francisco, CA for a gross purchase price of $23.6 million.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company sold an
apartment community with 149 homes located in Orange County, California.
Our long-term strategic plan is to continue achieving greater operating efficiencies by
investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been seeking to expand our
interests in communities located in the Boston, California, Metropolitan D.C., New York, and
Washington state markets over the past years. Prospectively, we plan to channel new investments
into those markets we believe will provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted
based upon defined criteria including above average job growth, low single-family home
affordability and limited new supply for multifamily housing- three key drivers to strong rental
growth.
Capital Expenditures
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures that materially enhance the value of
an existing asset or substantially extend the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures
necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as
incurred.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $35.8 million or $746 per stabilized home was
spent on recurring capital expenditures. These include revenue enhancing capital expenditures,
exterior/interior upgrades, turnover related expenditures for floor coverings and appliances, other
recurring capital expenditures such as exterior paint, roofs, siding, parking lots, and asset
preservation capital expenditures. In addition, major renovations totaled $23.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011. Total capital expenditures, which in aggregate include
recurring capital expenditures and major renovations, of $59.4 million or $1,236 per stabilized
home was spent on all of our communities, excluding development and commercial properties, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011.
63
The following table outlines capital expenditures and repair and maintenance costs for all of
our communities, excluding real estate under development, condominium conversions and commercial
properties, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per Home |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue enhancing improvements |
|
$ |
4,987 |
|
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
|
|
-60.2 |
% |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
|
-63.0 |
% |
Turnover capital expenditures |
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
% |
Asset preservation expenditures |
|
|
21,519 |
|
|
|
16,151 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
35,821 |
|
|
|
35,589 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
-6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major renovations |
|
|
23,562 |
|
|
|
21,248 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
59,383 |
|
|
$ |
56,837 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
|
-3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair and maintenance expense |
|
$ |
28,411 |
|
|
$ |
24,521 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stabilized home count |
|
|
48,028 |
|
|
|
44,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will continue to selectively add revenue enhancing improvements which we believe will
provide a return on investment substantially in excess of our cost of capital. Recurring capital
expenditures during 2011 are currently expected to be approximately $1,050 per home.
Development
At September 30, 2011, our development pipeline for wholly-owned communities totaled 1,641
homes with a budget of $524.3 million in which we have a carrying value of $192.9 million. We
anticipate the completion of these communities through the fourth quarter of 2013.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
In August 2011, the Company invested in a joint venture with an unaffiliated third party to
acquire and redevelop an existing commercial property into a 173 apartment home community in Orange
County, California. At closing the Company contributed $9 million and at September 30, 2011, UDR
owned a 90% controlling interest in the investment. Under the terms of the operating agreement, our
partner is required to achieve certain criteria as it relates to the entitlement process. If the
criteria is met on or before 730 days after the site plan application is deemed complete by the city, the Company is obligated to contribute an additional $3 million
to the joint venture for distribution to our partner. At the acquisition date, the Company accrued
and capitalized $3 million related to the contingent consideration, which represents the difference
between fair value of the property of $9.8 million on the formation date and the estimated fair
value of the underlying property upon completion of the entitlement process of $12.8 million. The
Company estimated the fair value based on Level 3 inputs utilized in a third party valuation.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company paid $450,000 to
acquire from our partner its remaining 2% noncontrolling interests in the 989 Elements, Elements
Too, and Bellevue joint ventures. The consideration paid was in excess of the book value of the
noncontrolling interest, and is reflected as a reduction of the Companys equity.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company recognizes earnings or losses from our investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures consisting of our proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of the joint venture. In
addition, we may earn fees for providing management services to the unconsolidated joint ventures.
As of September 30, 2011, UDR had investments in the following unconsolidated joint ventures which
are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
64
In November 2010, the Company acquired The Hanover Companys (Hanover) partnership interests
in the Hanover/MetLife Master Limited Partnership (the UDR/MetLife Partnership). The UDR/MetLife
Partnership owns a portfolio of 26 operating communities containing 5,748 apartment homes and 10
land parcels with the potential to develop approximately 2,000 additional apartment homes. Under
the terms of the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR acts as the general partner and earns fees for
property and asset management and financing transactions.
UDR acquired a weighted average ownership interest of 12.27% in the operating communities and
4.11% in the land parcels for $100.8 million. The initial investment of $100.8 million consisted of
$71.8 million in cash, which included associated transaction costs, and a $30 million payable
(includes discount of $1 million) to Hanover. UDR agreed to pay the $30 million balance to Hanover
in two interest free installments in the amounts of $20 million and $10 million on the first and
second anniversaries of the closing, respectively. The $30 million payable was recorded at its
present value of $29 million using an effective interest rate of 2.67%. At September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the net carrying value of the payable was $29.7 million and $29.1 million,
respectively. Interest expense of $197,000 and $588,000 was recorded during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys
investment was $128.1 million and $122.2 million, respectively.
UDRs total cost of its equity investment of $100.8 million differed from its proportionate
share in the underlying net assets of the UDR/MetLife Partnership of $111.4 million. The difference
of $10.6 million was attributable to certain assets and adjustments were allocated to UDRs
proportionate share in the UDR/MetLife Partnerships buildings of $8.4 million, land of $3.9
million, and ($1.6 million) of lease intangible assets. With the exception of land, the difference
related to buildings is amortized and recorded as a component of loss from unconsolidated entities
over 45 years and the difference related to lease intangible assets is amortized and recorded as a
component of loss from unconsolidated entities over 11 months with the offset to the Companys
carrying value of its equity investment. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
the Company recorded $396,000 and $1.2 million of amortization, respectively.
In connection with the purchase of Hanovers interests in the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR
agreed to indemnify Hanover from liabilities from Hanovers guaranty of $506 million in loans ($156
million outstanding at September 30, 2011) which are secured by a security interest in the
operating communities subject to the loans. The loans are to the sub-tier partnerships which own
the 26 operating communities. The Company anticipates that the balance of these loans will be
refinanced by the UDR/MetLife Partnership over the next twelve months.
In October 2010, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of Hanover to
develop a 240-home community in Stoughton, Massachusetts. At September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, UDR owned a noncontrolling interest of 95% in the joint venture. Our initial investment was
$10 million. Our investment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $17.3 million and $10.3
million, respectively.
In May 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of Hanover to develop
a 263-home community in San Diego, California. At September 30, 2011 and at closing, UDR owned a
noncontrolling interest of
95% in the joint venture. Our initial investment was $9.9 million. Our investment at September
30, 2011 was $11.1 million.
In June 2011, the UDR/MetLife Partnership sold a parcel of land to a joint venture, which the
Company entered into with an affiliate of Hanover to develop a 256-home community in College Park,
Maryland. At September 30, 2011 and at closing, UDR owned a noncontrolling interest of 95% in the
joint venture. Our initial investment was $7.1 million. Our investment at September 30, 2011 was
$7.6 million.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party, which formed a joint venture for the
investment of up to $450 million in multifamily properties located in key, high barrier to entry
markets. The partners will contribute equity of $180 million of which the Companys maximum equity
will be 30% or $54 million when fully invested. In 2010, the joint venture acquired its first
property (151 homes), and in August 2011, it acquired its second property (217 homes) in
Metropolitan Washington, D. C. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company owned a 30%
interest in the joint venture. Our investment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $15.3
million and $5.2 million, respectively.
65
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party which owns and operates 10 operating
properties located in Texas (3,992 homes). UDR contributed cash and a property equal to 20% of the
fair value of the properties. The unaffiliated member contributed cash equal to 80% of the fair
value of the properties comprising the joint venture, which was then used to purchase the nine
operating properties from UDR. Our initial investment was $20.4 million. Our investment at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $7.8 million and $10.3 million, respectively.
For additional information regarding these joint ventures, see Note 5, Joint Ventures, in the
Consolidated Financial Statements of UDR, Inc. included in this Report.
Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net cash provided by financing activities
was $907.9 million compared to $325.5 million for the comparable period of 2010.
The following significant financing activities occurred during the nine months ended September
30, 2011:
|
|
|
repaid $222.8 million of secured debt. The $222.8 million of secured debt includes
$187.4 million of construction loans, repayment of $13.3 million in tax exempt bonds,
repayment of $2.0 million of credit facilities and $20.1 million of mortgage payments; |
|
|
|
received proceeds of $30.5 million from secured debt financings. The $30.5 million
includes $25.5 million in variable rate mortgages and $5.0 million in fixed rate mortgages; |
|
|
|
net borrowings of $330.3 million were applied toward the Companys $600 million
revolving credit facility; |
|
|
|
certain holders submitted their outstanding 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2035 to
the Company for redemption. As a result, we repurchased notes with a notional value of
$10.8 million, representing approximately 6.44% of the $167.8 million in aggregate
principal amount outstanding, and expensed $207,000 of unamortized financing costs during
the three months ended March 31, 2011. On March 2, 2011 the Company called the remaining
outstanding notes with a notional value of $156.9 million. The notes were redeemed on April
4, 2011 and unamortized financing costs of $3.0 million were written off; |
|
|
|
repaid $97.1 million on our 3.625% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2011. |
|
|
|
issued $300 million in 4.25% Medium Term Notes due 2018; |
|
|
|
|
in September 2009, the Company initiated an At the Market equity distribution program
pursuant to which we may sell up to 15 million shares of common stock from time to time to
or through sales agents, by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the New York Stock
Exchange at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, or as otherwise agreed with the
applicable agent. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we sold 4,395,601 shares
of common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $104.5
million at a weighted average price per share of $23.78. Aggregate net proceeds from such
sales, after deducting related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of
approximately $2.1 million, were approximately $102.4 million; |
|
|
|
in March 2011, the Company entered into a new equity distribution agreement pursuant to
which the Company may offer and sell up to 20 million shares of its common stock over time
to or through its sales agents by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the New York
Stock Exchange at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, or as otherwise agreed with
the applicable agent. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we sold 1,720,999
shares of common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately
$43.7 million at a weighted average price per share of $25.41. Aggregate net proceeds from
such sales, after deducting related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales
agents of approximately $875,000, were approximately $42.9 million. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2011, we sold 10,800,343 shares of common stock through this program
for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $271.3 million at a weighted average price
per share of $25.12. Aggregate net proceeds from such sales, after deducting related
expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of approximately $5.5 million,
were approximately $265.8 million. |
|
|
|
in July 2011, the Company closed on a public offering of 20,700,000 shares of its common
stock, including 2,700,000 shares sold as a result of the underwriters exercise of their
overallotment option in full at the closing, at a price of $25.00 per share, for net proceeds of
approximately $496.3 million after underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses. |
66
Credit Facilities
As of September 30, 2011, we have secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate
commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for
an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate
facilities can be extended for an additional five years at our option. We have $895.2 million of
the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.32% and the remaining balance on
these facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.61%.
As of September 30, 2011, we had a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility. On
October 25, 2011, the Company entered into a new $900 million unsecured revolving credit facility,
replacing our $600 million facility. The new facility has an initial term of four years and
includes a one-year extension option, and contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase
the facility to $1.35 billion. Based on the Companys current credit ratings, the credit facility
carries an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 122.5 basis points and a facility fee of
22.5 basis points.
The Fannie Mae credit facilities and the bank revolving credit facility are subject to
customary financial covenants and limitations.
Derivative Instruments
As part of UDRs overall interest rate risk management strategy, we use derivatives as a means
to fix the interest rates of variable rate debt obligations or to hedge anticipated financing
transactions. UDRs derivative transactions used for interest rate risk management include interest
rate swaps with indexes that relate to the pricing of specific financial instruments of UDR. We
believe that we have appropriately controlled our interest rate risk through the use of derivative
instruments to minimize any unintended effect on consolidated earnings. Derivative contracts did
not have a material impact on the results of operations during the three months ended September 30,
2011 (see Note 11, Derivatives and Hedging Activity in the Consolidated Financial Statements of
UDR, Inc. included in this Report).
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations, or FFO, is defined as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP),
excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus real estate depreciation and
amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We compute
FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the recommendations set forth by the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) April 1, 2002 White Paper. We consider FFO
in evaluating property acquisitions and our operating performance, and believe that FFO should be
considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income and cash flow as a measure of our
activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. FFO does not represent cash
generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and
analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of REIT operating performance and defines FFO as net income (computed in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States), excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The use of FFO, combined with the
required presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating
results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more
meaningful. We generally consider FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our comparative
operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income
which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to
sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset
depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a Companys
real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that FFO is the best
measure of economic profitability for real estate investment trusts.
67
The following table outlines our FFO calculation and reconciliation to GAAP for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(13,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
(2,368 |
) |
|
|
(7,003 |
) |
|
|
(7,119 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
96,554 |
|
|
|
75,591 |
|
|
|
271,830 |
|
|
|
221,524 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(2,828 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
8,648 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property in discontinued operations,
excluding RE3 |
|
|
(11,364 |
) |
|
|
(3,878 |
) |
|
|
(55,172 |
) |
|
|
(3,999 |
) |
(Premium)/discount on preferred stock repurchases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) basic |
|
$ |
72,052 |
|
|
$ |
45,955 |
|
|
$ |
190,595 |
|
|
$ |
136,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
72,983 |
|
|
$ |
46,887 |
|
|
$ |
193,388 |
|
|
$ |
139,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP Units outstanding basic |
|
|
222,051 |
|
|
|
171,019 |
|
|
|
202,711 |
|
|
|
166,691 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP Units, and common stock
equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
227,243 |
|
|
|
176,480 |
|
|
|
207,854 |
|
|
|
171,936 |
|
In the computation of diluted FFO, OP Units, unvested restricted stock, stock options, and the
shares of Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock are dilutive; therefore, they are
included in the diluted share count.
RE3 is our subsidiary whose activities include development and land entitlement.
RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, is defined as net sales proceeds less
a tax provision and the gross investment basis of the asset before
accumulated depreciation. To determine whether gains from
RE3 will
be included in FFO, the Company considers whether the operating asset
has been a short term investment. We
consider FFO with RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, to be a meaningful
supplemental measure of performance because the short-term use of funds produce a profit that
differs from the traditional long-term investment in real estate for REITs.
68
The following table is our reconciliation of FFO share information to weighted average common
shares outstanding, basic and diluted, reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP units
outstanding basic |
|
|
222,051 |
|
|
|
171,019 |
|
|
|
202,711 |
|
|
|
166,691 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
(5,616 |
) |
|
|
(6,988 |
) |
|
|
(5,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -
basic per the Consolidated
Statements of Operations |
|
|
213,816 |
|
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
|
195,723 |
|
|
|
160,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP units, and
common stock equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
227,243 |
|
|
|
176,480 |
|
|
|
207,854 |
|
|
|
171,936 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(8,235 |
) |
|
|
(5,616 |
) |
|
|
(6,988 |
) |
|
|
(5,850 |
) |
Weighted average incremental shares from assumed conversion
of stock options |
|
|
(1,347 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
Weighted average incremental shares from unvested restricted stock |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
Weighted average number of Series E preferred shares outstanding |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding diluted
per the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
213,816 |
|
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
|
195,723 |
|
|
|
160,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP,
and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities,
as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally,
it is not necessarily indicative of cash availability to fund cash needs. A presentation of cash
flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
182,921 |
|
|
$ |
157,489 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,086,784 |
) |
|
|
(478,848 |
) |
Net cash used provided by financing activities |
|
|
907,859 |
|
|
|
325,481 |
|
Results of Operations
The following discussion includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations
for the periods presented.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $15.6 million ($.07 per diluted share) for
the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $26.1 million ($0.16 per diluted share)
for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net loss attributable to common
stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2011 resulted primarily from the following
items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
|
|
|
an increase in our net operating income primarily due to community acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase in net gain on the sale of depreciable property primarily related to the
disposition of two communities in September 2011. |
69
These were partially offset by:
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Companys acquisition of three
operating communities in the third quarter of 2011, five operating communities in the
second quarter of 2011 and five operating communities in the third quarter of 2010, and the
completion of redevelopment and development communities during 2010. |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $33.7 million ($0.17 per diluted share) for
the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $81.5 million ($0.51 per diluted share) for
the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net loss attributable to common
stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 resulted primarily from the following
items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:
|
|
|
an increase in our net operating income primarily due to community acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
an increase in net gain on the sale of depreciable property primarily related to the
disposition of nine communities during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. |
These were partially offset by:
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Companys acquisition of three
operating communities in the third quarter of 2011, five operating communities in the
second quarter of 2011 and five operating communities in the third quarter of 2010, and the
completion of redevelopment and development communities during 2010. |
Apartment Community Operations
Our net operating income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment
communities. The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment
portfolio which includes discontinued operations and excludes commercial operating income and
expense for each of the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rental income |
|
$ |
187,137 |
|
|
$ |
157,630 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
$ |
529,774 |
|
|
$ |
459,915 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
Property operating expense (a) |
|
|
(63,730 |
) |
|
|
(56,688 |
) |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
(180,421 |
) |
|
|
(162,762 |
) |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income
(NOI) |
|
$ |
123,407 |
|
|
$ |
100,942 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
$ |
349,353 |
|
|
$ |
297,153 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses. |
70
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net loss attributable to UDR as
reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the periods presented (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
123,407 |
|
|
$ |
100,942 |
|
|
$ |
349,353 |
|
|
$ |
297,153 |
|
Other income |
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
Non-property income |
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
12,620 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(96,554 |
) |
|
|
(75,591 |
) |
|
|
(271,830 |
) |
|
|
(221,524 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(40,079 |
) |
|
|
(38,257 |
) |
|
|
(118,642 |
) |
|
|
(113,068 |
) |
General and administrative and property
management |
|
|
(17,157 |
) |
|
|
(16,403 |
) |
|
|
(50,312 |
) |
|
|
(44,739 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
(3,012 |
) |
|
|
(3,755 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
|
(4,342 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
Redeemable non-controlling interests in OP |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
Net gain on sale of properties |
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
56,063 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(13,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities
Our same community properties (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to July 1, 2010
and held on September 30, 2011) consisted of 39,567 apartment homes and provided 74% of our total
property NOI for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
NOI for our same community properties increased 7.0% or $6.0 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in property NOI was
attributable to a 5.0% or $6.4 million increase in property rental income, which was partially
offset by a 1.1% or $474,000 increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues was primarily
driven by a 4.7% or $5.9 million increase in rental rates and a 19.2% or $1.2 million increase in
reimbursement and fee income, partially offset by an 8.8% or $433,000 increase in vacancy loss.
Physical occupancy increased 0.1% to 95.6% and total monthly income per occupied home increased
4.9% to $1,201.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 6.2% or $470,000
increase in utilities and a 4.7% or $597,000 increase in real estate taxes. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease of 4.9% or $562,000 in personnel costs.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
increased to 66.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 65.3% for the
comparable period in 2010.
Our same community properties (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1,
2010 and held on September 30, 2011) consisted of 39,030 apartment homes and provided 75% of our
total property NOI for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
NOI for our same community properties increased 4.8% or $12.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in property NOI was
attributable to a 3.7% or $14.2 million increase in property rental income, which was partially
offset by a 1.6% or $2.1 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues was
primarily driven by a 3.6% or $13.3 million increase in rental rates and a 9.1% or $2.6 million
increase in reimbursement and fee income. This increase was partially offset by a 10.1% or $1.4
million increase in vacancy loss and a 19.4% or $308,000 increase of bad debt write offs. Physical occupancy
decreased 0.1% to 95.6% and total monthly income per occupied home increased 3.8% to $1,178.
71
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 4.9% or $1.0 million
increase in utilities expense, a 6.7% or $457,000 increase in insurance costs, a 1.8% or $386,000
increase in repair and maintenance, and a 2.4% or $191,000 increase in administrative and marketing
expenses.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
increased to 66.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 65.8% for the
comparable period in 2010.
Non-Mature/Other Communities
The remaining $32.7 million or 26% and $86.4 million and 25% of our total NOI during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was generated from our non-mature communities. UDRs
non-mature communities consist of communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same
communities, which includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold
properties, non-apartment components of mixed use properties, properties classified as real estate
held for disposition and condominium properties. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011, we recognized NOI from our developments of $4.5 million and $12.9 million, NOI from our sold
or held for sale communities of $1.8 million and $10.5 million, NOI from acquired communities of
$13.6 million and $31.4 million, and NOI from redeveloped properties of $11.1 million and $26.6
million.
Other Income
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold marketable securities for
$3.5 million, resulting in a gain of $3.1 million, which is included in other income. The Company
also sold its cost investment in a privately held company for $3.6 million resulting in a gain of
$2.6 million, which is included in other income. For the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, other income on continuing operations includes fees earned from the
Companys joint ventures of $2.5 million and $6.4 million and $453,000 and $1.5 million,
respectively. Other income on continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 also includes interest income and discount amortization from an interest in a convertible
debt security of $957,000 and $2.9 million. The nine months ended September 30, 2010 also includes
$2.1 million, of which $1.8 million is included in discontinued operations, for a recovery from
real estate tax accruals.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, real estate depreciation and
amortization on both continuing and discontinued operations increased 27.7% or $21.0 million and
22.7% and $50.3 million, respectively, as compared to the comparable periods in 2010. The increases
in depreciation and amortization for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are
primarily the result of acquisitions of three apartment communities during the third quarter of
2011, five apartment communities during the second quarter of 2011, acquisitions of five apartment
communities during the third quarter of 2010, development and redevelopment activity during 2011
and 2010, and additional capital expenditures. As part of the Companys acquisition activity a
portion of the purchase price is attributable to the fair value of intangible assets which are
typically amortized over a period of less than one year.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, interest expense on both continuing and
discontinued operations increased 4.8% or $1.8 million and 4.9% or $5.6 million as compared to the
comparable period in 2010. This increase in interest expense was primarily due to slightly higher
debt balances. The increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the
comparable period in 2010 was also attributable to the write off of $4.0 million of deferred
financing costs related to the prepayment of debt.
72
General and Administrative
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, general and administrative expense did not
significantly change as compared to the comparable period in 2010. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, general and administrative expenses increased 11.2% or $3.6 million as compared
to the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in acquisition costs
related to the Companys acquisitions of eight operating communities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While
the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and
material costs, the majority of our leases are for a term of fourteen months or less, which
generally enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our
apartment homes. Although an extreme escalation in energy and food costs could have a negative
impact on our residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had
a material impact on our results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In November 2010, the Company acquired The Hanover Companys (Hanover) partnership interests
in the Hanover/MetLife Master Limited Partnership (theUDR/MetLife Partnership). The UDR/MetLife
Partnership owns a portfolio of 26 operating communities containing 5,748 apartment homes and 10
land parcels with the potential to develop approximately 2,000 additional apartment homes. Under
the terms of the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR acts as the general partner and earn fees for
property and asset management and financing transactions.
In connection with the purchase of Hanovers interests in the UDR/MetLife Partnership, UDR
agreed to indemnify Hanover from liabilities from Hanovers
guaranty of $506 million in loans ($156 million
outstanding at September 30, 2011) which
are secured by a security interest in the operating communities subject to the loan. The loans are
to the sub-tier partnerships which own the 26 operating communities. The Company anticipates that
the balance of these loans will be refinanced by the UDR/MetLife Partnership over the next twelve
months.
We do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably
likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that are material.
73
UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.:
Business Overview
United Dominion Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership or UDR, L.P.), is a Delaware
limited partnership formed in February 2004 and organized pursuant to the provisions of the
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (as amended from time to time, or any successor to
such statute, the Act). The Operating Partnership is the successor-in-interest to United Dominion
Realty, L.P., a limited partnership formed under the laws of Virginia, which commenced operations
on November 4, 1995. Our sole general partner is UDR, Inc., a Maryland corporation (UDR or the
General Partner), which conducts a substantial amount of its business and holds a substantial
amount of its assets through the Operating Partnership. At September 30, 2011, the Operating
Partnerships real estate portfolio included 81 communities located in 9 states plus the District
of Columbia, with a total of 24,200 apartment homes.
As of September 30, 2011, UDR owned 110,883 units of our general limited partnership interests
and 174,741,015 units of our limited partnership interests (the OP Units), or approximately 94.9%
of our outstanding OP Units. By virtue of its ownership of our OP Units and being our sole general
partner, UDR has the ability to control all of the day-to-day operations of the Operating
Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in
this Report to the Operating Partnership or we, us or our refer to UDR, L.P. together with
its consolidated subsidiaries. We refer to our General Partner together with its consolidated
subsidiaries (including us) and the General Partners consolidated joint ventures as UDR or the
General Partner.
UDR operates as a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT. UDR focuses on
owning, acquiring, renovating, developing, and managing apartment communities nationwide. The
General Partner was formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation and changed its state of incorporation
from Virginia to Maryland in September 2003. At September 30, 2011, the General Partners
consolidated real estate portfolio included 172 communities located in 11 states and the District
of Columbia with a total of 49,674 apartment homes. In addition, the General Partner has an
ownership interest in 38 communities with 10,108 completed apartment homes through unconsolidated
joint ventures.
74
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of
September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
September 30, 2011 (a) |
|
|
September 30, 2011 (a) |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
Same Communities |
|
Communities |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Co, CA |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
$ |
502,107 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
369,630 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
% |
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
2,038 |
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
153,625 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
1,103 |
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
124,865 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
% |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,761 |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
100,184 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,294 |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
207,749 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
% |
|
|
1,262 |
|
Inland Empire, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
120,030 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
% |
|
|
1,279 |
|
Sacramento, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
68,807 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
|
884 |
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
70,263 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
549,186 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
% |
|
|
1,757 |
|
Baltimore, MD |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
146,830 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
110,290 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
% |
|
|
1,033 |
|
Nashville, TN |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
128,266 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
% |
|
|
862 |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
42,532 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
880 |
|
Other Florida |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
77,021 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
% |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
183,815 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
% |
|
|
1,168 |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
72,585 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average Same Communities |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
20,067 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
3,027,785 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Matures, Commercial Properties &
Other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
1,294,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Held for Investment |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4,322,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned, Net of
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,356,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The same community population for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes
20,067 homes. |
|
(b) |
|
Total Income per Occupied Home represents total monthly revenues divided by the product
of occupancy and the number of mature apartment homes. |
We report in two segments: Same Communities and Non-Mature/Other Communities. Our Same
Communities segment includes those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to July 1,
2010, and held as of September 30, 2011. These communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy
and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within the
current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy
for at least three consecutive months. Our Non-Mature/Other Communities segment includes those
communities that were acquired or developed in 2010 or 2011, sold properties, redevelopment
properties, properties classified as real estate held for sale, condominium conversion properties,
joint venture properties, properties managed by third parties, and the non-apartment components of
mixed use properties.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through
operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of debt. Both the coordination of
asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to the maintenance of
liquidity. The Operating Partnerships primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations as
determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of
apartment homes and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements. The
General Partner will routinely use its unsecured credit facility to temporarily fund certain
investing and financing activities prior to arranging for longer-term financing or the issuance of
equity or debt securities. Historically, proceeds from the sale of real estate have been used for
both investing and financing activities as we repositioned our portfolio.
75
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations and borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements. We expect
to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as scheduled debt maturities and potential
property acquisitions through borrowings and the disposition of properties. We believe that our net
cash provided by operations and borrowings will continue to be adequate to meet both operating
requirements and the payment of distributions. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements
and renovations of certain properties are expected to be funded from property operations,
borrowings allocated to us under the General Partners credit agreements the Operating Partnership
is a party to, loans from the General Partner, and proceeds from sales of properties.
Future Capital Needs
Future capital expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from the issuance of
secured debt, the sale of properties, the borrowings allocated to us under our General Partners
credit agreements, and to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided by operating activities, loans
from the General Partner and proceeds from sales of properties. Acquisition activity in strategic
markets is expected to be largely financed by the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of
properties, the issuance of OP units and the assumption or placement of secured debt.
During the remainder of 2011, the Operating Partnership has approximately $1.8 million of
secured debt maturing, inclusive of principal amortization and net of extension rights of $30.9
million. We anticipate that we will repay that debt with operating cash flows, proceeds from
borrowings allocated to us under our General Partners credit agreements, borrowings from the
General Partner, proceeds from sales of properties, or by exercising extension rights on such
secured debt, as applicable. The repayment of debt will be recorded as an offset to the Receivable
due from General Partner.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting of our
financial condition and results and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. These
policies include those related to (1) capital expenditures, (2) impairment of long-lived assets,
(3) real estate investment properties, and (4) revenue recognition.
Our other critical accounting policies are described in more detail in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in UDRs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 23,
2011. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies from those
reported in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2011. With respect to these critical
accounting policies, we believe that the application of judgments and assessments is consistently
applied and produces financial information that fairly depicts the results of operations for all
periods presented.
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities,
and net cash used in investing activities, and provided by/(used in) financing activities that are
presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010.
Operating Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net cash flow provided by operating activities
was $127.5 million compared to $126.8 million for the comparable period in 2010. The decrease in
net cash flow from operating activities was primarily due to changes in operating assets and operating liabilities due to
property acquisitions partially offset by an increase in property operating income.
Investing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities was
$347.5 million compared to $43.8 million for the comparable period in 2010. Changes in the level of
investment activities from period to period reflect our strategy as it relates to acquisitions and
capital expenditures.
76
Acquisitions and Dispositions
The Operating Partnership did not acquire or dispose of any communities during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010.
In April 2011, UDR and the Operating Partnership closed on an acquisition of a 493- home multifamily
apartment community referred to as 10 Hanover Square, located in New York, New York. The community
was acquired for $259.8 million, which included assumed debt with a fair value
of $208.1 million and the issuance of 2,569,606 OP Units of the Operating Partnership. The OP
Units were deemed to have a value equal to the greater of $25.00 or the volume weighted average closing price per share of
the Companys common stock for the 10 day period ended on (and including) the date one business day
prior to the settlement date. For purchase price accounting purposes, the fair value of these OP
units was $24.47 at settlement date.
In April 2011, the Operating Partnership and its General Partner completed a $500 million
asset exchange whereby the Operating Partnership acquired two multifamily apartment communities
(833 homes) and a parcel of land, and UDR acquired one multifamily apartment community (227 homes).
The acquired assets are: 388 Beale in San Francisco, CA (227 homes)-acquired by UDR; 14 North in Peabody, MA (387
homes); and Inwood West in Woburn, MA (446 homes). The communities acquired were valued at $263.0
million representing their estimated fair value. The Company and the Operating Partnership paid
$28.1 million of cash and assumed debt with a fair value of $61.7 million. The
Operating Partnership sold four multifamily apartment communities (984 homes) and UDR sold two
multifamily apartment communities (434 homes) located in California as part of the transaction. The
communities are: Crest at Phillips Ranch, Villas at San Dimas, Villas at Bonita, The
Arboretum, Rancho Vallecitos and Milazzo.
In August 2011, UDR and the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of a 507- home multifamily
apartment community referred to as 95 Wall located in New York, New York. The community was
acquired for $328.9 million, which included the issuance of 1,802,239 OP Units of the Operating
Partnership. The OP Units were deemed to have a value equal to the greater of $25.00 or the volume
weighted average closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the 10-day period ended
on (and including) the date one business day prior to the settlement date. For purchase price
accounting purposes, the fair value of these OP units was $26.71 at settlement date.
The Operating Partnerships long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater operating
efficiencies by investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been seeking to
expand our interests in communities located in Boston, California, Metropolitan Washington D.C.,
New York, and the Washington state markets over the past years. Prospectively, we plan to continue
to channel new investments into those markets we believe will continue to provide the best
investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including above average
job growth, low single-family home affordability and limited, new supply for multifamily housing-
three key drivers to strong rental growth.
Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net cash provided by/(used in) financing
activities was $223.1 million compared to ($82.5) million for the comparable period of 2010. The
increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to advances from the General
Partner, which was partially offset by a decrease in the proceeds from the issuance of secured debt
and an increase in payments on secured debt.
Credit Facilities
As of September 30, 2011, the General Partner had secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae
with an aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit
facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and
certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at the General
Partners option. At September 30, 2011, $895.2 million of the funded balance was fixed at a
weighted average interest rate of 5.32% and the remaining balance on these facilities was at a
weighted average variable rate of 1.61%. At September 30, 2011, $736.9 million of these credit
facilities are allocated to the Operating Partnership based on the ownership of the assets securing
the debt.
77
The Operating Partnership is a guarantor on the General Partners $250 million term loan due January 2016, $100
million term loan due December 2013, and $300 million of medium-term notes due June 2018. At September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, the Operating Partnership guaranteed the General Partners unsecured credit facility, with an
aggregate borrowing capacity of $600 million. The outstanding balance under the unsecured credit
facility was $362.0 million and $31.8 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. On October 25, 2011, the Operating Partnership issued a guarantee in conjunction with
a new $900 million unsecured revolving credit facility entered into by our General Partner. The new
facility replaces the General Partners $600 million facility.
The credit facilities are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.
Other Guarantees
At September 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership guaranteed certain outstanding securities of
UDR, such that the Operating Partnership, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, irrevocably
and unconditionally guarantees to each holder of the applicable securities and to the trustee and
their successors and assigns under the respective indenture (a) the full and punctual payment when
due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of UDR under the
respective indenture whether for principal of or interest on the securities (and
premium, if any), and all other monetary obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and
the terms of the applicable securities and (b) the full and punctual performance within the
applicable grace periods of all other obligations of UDR under the respective indenture and the
terms of the applicable securities.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing
debt that has to be refinanced. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes, but rather issue these financial instruments to finance our portfolio of real
estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest
rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected
as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed
rate debt. We had $240.4 million in variable rate debt that is not subject to interest rate swap
contracts as of September 30, 2011. If market interest rates for variable rate debt increased by
100 basis points, our interest expense would increase by $2.4 million based on the balance at
September 30, 2011.
These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our
borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall
economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of
such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the
change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their
possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
The following discussion explains the changes in results of operations that are presented in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, and includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods
presented.
Net Loss Attributable to OP Unitholders
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders was $6.6 million ($0.04 per OP unit) for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $6.8 million ($0.04 per OP unit) for the comparable
period in the prior year. The decrease in net loss attributable to OP unit holders resulted
primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within
this Report:
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income primarily due to community acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
a decrease in general and administrative expenses. |
78
These changes were partially offset by:
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Operating Partnerships
acquisitions of three operating communities in April 2011 and one operating community in
August 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase in interest expense related to debt assumed on certain acquisitions in April
2011. |
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders was $1.2 million ($0.01 per OP unit) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $12.4 million ($0.07 per OP unit), for the
comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in net loss attributable to OP unit holders
resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere
within this Report:
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income primarily due to community acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase in net gain on the sale of depreciable property primarily related to the
disposition of four communities in April 2011. |
These changes were partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to
the Operating Partnerships acquisitions of three operating communities in April 2011 and one
operating community in August 2011.
Apartment Community Operations
Our net income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment communities.
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total portfolio for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rental income |
|
$ |
99,833 |
|
|
$ |
88,222 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
$ |
285,795 |
|
|
$ |
261,517 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Property operating expense (a) |
|
|
(31,059 |
) |
|
|
(29,937 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
(91,585 |
) |
|
|
(86,478 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income (NOI) |
|
$ |
68,774 |
|
|
$ |
58,285 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
$ |
194,210 |
|
|
$ |
175,039 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses. |
79
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net loss attributable to OP unit
holders as reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
68,774 |
|
|
$ |
58,285 |
|
|
$ |
194,210 |
|
|
$ |
175,039 |
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(51,906 |
) |
|
|
(41,674 |
) |
|
|
(143,289 |
) |
|
|
(124,797 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
(13,948 |
) |
|
|
(13,240 |
) |
|
|
(39,742 |
) |
|
|
(39,281 |
) |
General and administrative and property
management |
|
|
(8,139 |
) |
|
|
(9,055 |
) |
|
|
(24,127 |
) |
|
|
(21,315 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(4,203 |
) |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
Net gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16,055 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to OP unitholders |
|
$ |
(6,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,845 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Communities
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to July 1, 2010
and held on September 30, 2011) consisted of 20,067 apartment homes and provided 76.3% of our total
NOI for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
NOI for our same store community properties increased 8.2% or $4.0 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in property NOI
was primarily attributable to a 5.4% or $4.0 million increase in property rental income. The
increase in revenues was primarily driven by a 5.0% or $3.6 million increase in rental rates, and a
14.9% or $808,000 increase in reimbursement and fee income. These increases were partially offset
by a 8.4% or $246,000 increase in vacancy loss and a 45.6% or $166,000 increase in bad debt write
offs. Physical occupancy decreased 0.1% to 95.4% and total income per occupied home increased $70
to $1,344 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Property operating expenses decreased by 0.1% or $30,000 for the nine months September 30,
2011.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income, the operating margin
(property net operating income divided by property rental income) was 67.9% for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 66.2% for the comparable period in 2010.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Our same store communities (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1, 2010
and held on September 30, 2011) consisted of 20,067 apartment homes and provided 79.1% of our total
NOI for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
NOI for our same store community properties increased 5.5% or $8.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in property NOI was
primarily attributable to a 4.1% or $8.9 million increase in property rental income which was
partially offset by a 1.3% or $929,000 increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues
was primarily driven by a 3.9% or $8.3 million increase in rental rates, and a 9.7% or $1.5 million
increase in reimbursement and fee income. These increases were partially offset by a 11.4% or
$939,000 increase in vacancy loss. Physical occupancy decreased 0.2% to 95.5% and total income per
occupied home increased $55 to $1,316 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the
same period in 2010.
The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 5.2% or $600,000
increase in utilities, a 2.0% or $225,000 increase in repairs and maintenance, a 7.9% or $251,000
increase in insurance costs and a 3.6% or $160,000 increase in administrative and marketing costs.
These increases were partially offset by a 1.9% and $453,000 decrease in real estate taxes.
80
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
was 67.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 66.8% for the comparable
period in 2010.
Non-Mature/Other Communities
Three and nine months Ended September 30, 2011
The
remaining $16.3 million or 23.7% and $40.5 million or 20.9% of our total NOI during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, was generated from communities that
we classify as non-mature communities. The Operating Partnerships non-mature communities consist
of communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same store communities, which
includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold properties,
non-apartment components of mixed use properties, properties classified as real estate held for
disposition and condominium properties. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, we
recognized NOI from our acquired communities of $7.1 million and NOI from our redevelopment
properties of $6.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized NOI from
our acquired communities of $13.3 million, NOI from our redevelopment properties of $17.7 million,
and NOI from our sold properties of $2.9 million.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, real estate depreciation and
amortization from continuing and discontinued operations increased by 24.6% or $10.2 million and
14.8% or $18.5 million, respectively. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily the result of the acquisitions of three
apartment communities during the second quarter of 2011 and one apartment community during the
third quarter of 2011. As part of the Companys acquisition activity a portion of the purchase
price is attributable to the fair value of intangible assets which are typically amortized over a
period of less than one year.
Interest Expense
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, interest expense from continuing and
discontinued operations increased by 5.3% or $708,000 and 1.2% or $461,000, respectively. This
increase is primarily due to an increase in secured debt due to acquisitions and an increase in
interest rates on secured debt.
General and Administrative and Property Management
The Operating Partnership is charged directly for general and administrative expenses it
incurs. The Operating Partnership is also charged for other general and administrative expenses
that have been allocated by UDR to each of its subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership,
based on each subsidiarys pro-rata portion of UDRs total apartment homes.
General and administrative expenses decreased 18.6% or $1.2 million during the three months
ended September 30, 2011, and increased 15.2% or $2.1 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 as compared to the comparable period in 2010. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011, general and administrative expenses include acquisition-related costs of
$194,000 and $2.3 million, respectively. The increases, net of these acquisition-related costs,
were consistent with the changes in UDRs general and administrative expenses for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Income from Discontinued Operations
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, income from discontinued operations did not
significantly change. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized income
from discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes of $16.4 million and $1.7 million,
respectively. The increase in income from discontinued operations primarily relates to the sale of
four apartment communities during the second quarter of 2011.
81
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While
the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and
material costs, substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which generally
enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by
increasing rents on our apartment homes. Although an extreme escalation in energy and food
costs could have a negative impact on our residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we
do not believe this has had a material impact on our results for the three and nine month period
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have,
a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are
material.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company and the Operating Partnership are exposed to interest rate changes associated with
our unsecured credit facility and other variable rate debt as well as refinancing risk on our fixed
rate debt. The Companys and the Operating Partnerships involvement with derivative financial
instruments is limited and we do not expect to use them for trading or other speculative purposes.
The Company and the Operating Partnership use derivative instruments solely to manage their
exposure to interest rates.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the heading
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a more complete
discussion of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. As of September 30, 2011, our
market risk has not changed materially from the amounts reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Operating Partnership are
designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote. As a result, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable
assurance that such disclosure controls and procedures will meet their objectives.
As of September 30, 2011, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company
and the Operating Partnership. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the
Company and the Operating Partnership are effective at the reasonable assurance level described
above.
82
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is a party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
There are many factors that affect the business and the results of operations of the Company
and the Operating Partnership, some of which are beyond the control of the Company and the
Operating Partnership. The following is a description of important factors that may cause the
actual results of operations of the Company and the Operating Partnership in future periods to
differ materially from those currently expected or discussed in forward-looking statements set
forth in this Report relating to our financial results, operations and business prospects.
Forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of the
date of this Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise
any forward-looking statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations with
regard thereto, or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such
statement is based, except to the extent otherwise required by law.
Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Our Operations
Unfavorable Apartment Market and Economic Conditions Could Adversely Affect Occupancy Levels,
Rental Revenues and the Value of Our Real Estate Assets. Unfavorable market conditions in the areas
in which we operate and unfavorable economic conditions generally may significantly affect our
occupancy levels, our rental rates and collections, the value of the properties and our ability to
strategically acquire or dispose of apartment communities on economically favorable terms. Our
ability to lease our properties at favorable rates is adversely affected by the increase in supply
in the multifamily market and is dependent upon the overall level in the economy, which is
adversely affected by, among other things, job losses and unemployment levels, recession, personal
debt levels, the downturn in the housing market, stock market volatility and uncertainty about the
future. Some of our major expenses, including mortgage payments and real estate taxes, generally do
not decline when related rents decline. We would expect that declines in our occupancy levels,
rental revenues and/or the values of our apartment communities would cause us to have less cash
available to pay our indebtedness and to distribute to our stockholders, which could adversely
affect our financial condition and the market value of our securities. Factors that may affect our
occupancy levels, our rental revenues, and/or the value of our properties include the following,
among others:
|
|
|
downturns in the national, regional and local economic conditions, particularly
increases in unemployment; |
|
|
|
|
declines in mortgage interest rates, making alternative housing more affordable; |
|
|
|
|
government or builder incentives which enable first time homebuyers to put little or no
money down, making alternative housing options more attractive; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, including oversupply of, or reduced demand for,
apartment homes; |
|
|
|
|
declines in the financial condition of our tenants, which may make it more difficult for
us to collect rents from some tenants; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market rental rates; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and costs associated with property improvements, repairs or renovations; |
|
|
|
|
declines in household formation; and |
|
|
|
|
rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental housing, which could
prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs. |
83
Continued Economic Weakness Following the Economic Recession that the U.S. Economy Recently
Experienced May Materially and Adversely Affect our Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The U.S. economy continues to experience weakness following a severe recession, which has resulted
in increased unemployment, decreased consumer spending and a decline in residential and commercial
property values. Although
it is not clear whether the U.S. economy has fully emerged from the recession, high levels of
unemployment have continued to persist. If the economic recovery continues to slow or stalls, we
may experience adverse effects on our occupancy levels, our rental revenues and the value of our
properties, any of which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of
operations.
Substantial International, National and Local Government Spending and Increasing Deficits May
Adversely Impact Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The values of, and
the cash flows from, the properties we own are affected by developments in global, national and
local economies. As a result of the recent recession and the significant government interventions,
federal, state and local governments have incurred record deficits and assumed or guaranteed
liabilities of private financial institutions or other private entities. These increased budget
deficits and the weakened financial condition of federal, state and local governments may lead to
reduced governmental spending, tax increases, public sector job losses, increased interest rates,
currency devaluations or other adverse economic events, which may directly or indirectly adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risk of Inflation/Deflation. Substantial inflationary or deflationary pressures could have a
negative effect on rental rates and property operating expenses. Neither inflation nor deflation
has materially impacted our operations in the recent past. The general risk of inflation is that
our debt interest and general and administrative expenses increase at a rate higher than our rental
rates. The predominant effects of deflation include high unemployment and credit contraction.
Restricted lending practices could impact our ability to obtain financing or refinancing for our
properties. High unemployment may have a negative effect on our occupancy levels and our rental
revenues.
We Are Subject to Certain Risks Associated with Selling Apartment Communities, Which Could
Limit Our Operational and Financial Flexibility. We periodically dispose of apartment communities
that no longer meet our strategic objectives, but adverse market conditions may make it difficult
to sell apartment communities like the ones we own. We cannot predict whether we will be able to
sell any property for the price or on the terms we set, or whether any price or other terms offered
by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time
needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. Furthermore, we may be
required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold.
These conditions may limit our ability to dispose of properties and to change our portfolio
promptly in order to meet our strategic objectives, which may in turn have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and the market value of our securities.
We are also subject to the following risks in connection with sales of our apartment
communities:
|
|
|
a significant portion of the proceeds from our overall property sales may be held by
intermediaries in order for some sales to qualify as like-kind exchanges under Section 1031
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, so that any related
capital gain can be deferred for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we may not have
immediate access to all of the cash proceeds generated from our property sales; and |
|
|
|
|
federal tax laws limit our ability to profit on the sale of communities that we have
owned for less than two years, and this limitation may prevent us from selling communities
when market conditions are favorable. |
Competition Could Limit Our Ability to Lease Apartment Homes or Increase or Maintain Rents.
Our apartment communities compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents,
including other apartment communities, condominiums and single-family rental homes, as well as
owner occupied single-and multi-family homes. Competitive housing in a particular area could
adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and increase or maintain rents.
84
We May Not Realize the Anticipated Benefits of Past or Future Acquisitions, and the Failure to
Integrate Acquired Communities and New Personnel Successfully Could Create Inefficiencies. We have
selectively acquired in the past, and if presented with attractive opportunities we intend to
selectively acquire in the future, apartment communities that meet our investment criteria. Our
acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
|
even if we are able to finance the acquisition, cash flow from the acquisition may be
insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments on the acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for an apartment community, we may be
unable to complete the acquisition after incurring certain acquisition-related costs; |
|
|
|
|
we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with the
evaluation and negotiation of potential acquisitions, including potential acquisitions that
we are subsequently unable to complete; |
|
|
|
|
an acquired apartment community may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our
investment, or a significant exposure related to the acquired property may go undetected
during our due diligence procedures; |
|
|
|
|
when we acquire an apartment community, we may invest additional amounts in it with the
intention of increasing profitability, and these additional investments may not produce the
anticipated improvements in profitability; and |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate acquired apartment communities and
new personnel into our existing operations, and the failure to successfully integrate such
apartment communities or personnel will result in inefficiencies that could adversely
affect our expected return on our investments and our overall profitability. |
In the past, other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and
investment funds, developer partnerships, investment companies and other public and private
apartment REITs, have competed with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new
properties, and such competition in the future may make it more difficult for us to pursue
attractive investment opportunities on favorable terms, which could adversely affect growth.
Development and Construction Risks Could Impact Our Profitability. In the past we have
selectively pursued the development and construction of apartment communities, and we intend to do
so in the future as appropriate opportunities arise. Development activities have been, and in the
future may be, conducted through wholly owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with
unaffiliated parties. Our development and construction activities are subject to the following
risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain construction financing for development activities under
favorable terms, including but not limited to interest rates, maturity dates and/or loan to
value ratios, or at all which could cause us to delay or even abandon potential
developments; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain, or face delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use,
building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations, which could
result in increased development costs, could delay initial occupancy dates for all or a
portion of a development community, and could require us to abandon our activities entirely
with respect to a project for which we are unable to obtain permits or authorizations; |
85
|
|
|
yields may be less than anticipated as a result of delays in completing projects, costs
that exceed budget and/or higher than expected concessions for lease up and lower rents
than pro forma; |
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to find joint venture partners to help fund the development of a
community or otherwise obtain acceptable financing for the developments, our development
capacity may be limited; |
|
|
|
|
we may abandon development opportunities that we have already begun to explore, and we
may fail to recover expenses already incurred in connection with exploring such
opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up of a community on schedule, or
incur development or construction costs that exceed our original estimates, and we may be
unable to charge rents that would compensate for any increase in such costs; |
|
|
|
|
occupancy rates and rents at a newly developed community may fluctuate depending on a
number of factors, including market and economic conditions, preventing us from meeting our
profitability goals for that community; and |
|
|
|
|
when we sell to third parties communities or properties that we developed or renovated,
we may be subject to warranty or construction defect claims that are uninsured or exceed
the limits of our insurance. |
In some cases in the past, the costs of upgrading acquired communities exceeded our original
estimates. We may experience similar cost increases in the future. Our inability to charge rents
that will be sufficient to offset the effects of any increases in these costs may impair our
profitability.
Bankruptcy of Developers in Our Development Joint Ventures Could Impose Delays and Costs on Us
With Respect to the Development of Our Communities and May Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition
and Results of Operations. The bankruptcy of one of the developers in any of our development joint
ventures could materially and adversely affect the relevant property or properties. If the relevant
joint venture through which we have invested in a property has incurred recourse obligations, the
discharge in bankruptcy of the developer may require us to honor a completion guarantee and
therefore might result in our ultimate liability for a greater portion of those obligations than we
would otherwise bear.
Property Ownership Through Joint Ventures May Limit Our Ability to Act Exclusively in Our
Interest. We have in the past and may in the future develop and acquire properties in joint
ventures with other persons or entities when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such
structures. If we use such a structure, we could become engaged in a dispute with one or more of
our joint venture partners that might affect our ability to operate a jointly-owned property.
Moreover, joint venture partners may have business, economic or other objectives that are
inconsistent with our objectives, including objectives that relate to the appropriate timing and
terms of any sale or refinancing of a property. In some instances, joint venture partners may have
competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest.
Some Potential Losses May Not Be Adequately Covered by Insurance. We have a comprehensive
insurance program covering our property and operating activities. We believe the policy
specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate. There are,
however, certain types of extraordinary losses which may not be adequately covered under our
insurance program. In addition, we will sustain losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insured
retention, uninsured claims or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage.
If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a
portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue
from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt
or other financial obligations related to the property. Material losses in excess of insurance
proceeds may occur in the future. If one or more of our significant properties were to experience a
catastrophic loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large
expenses to repair or rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our cash flow and
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
86
Failure to Succeed in New Markets May Limit Our Growth. We have acquired in the past, and we
may acquire in the future if appropriate opportunities arise, apartment communities that are
outside of our existing markets. Entering into new markets may expose us to a variety of risks, and
we may not be able to operate successfully in new markets. These risks include, among others:
|
|
|
inability to accurately evaluate local apartment market conditions and local economies; |
|
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures; and |
|
|
|
|
inability to achieve budgeted financial results. |
Potential Liability for Environmental Contamination Could Result in Substantial Costs. Under
various federal, state and local environmental laws, as a current or former owner or operator of
real estate, we could be required to investigate and remediate the effects of contamination of
currently or formerly owned real estate by hazardous or toxic substances, often regardless of our
knowledge of or responsibility for the contamination and solely by virtue of our current or former
ownership or operation of the real estate. In addition, we could be held liable to a governmental
authority or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred
in connection with the contamination. These costs could be substantial, and in many cases
environmental laws create liens in favor of governmental authorities to secure their payment. The
presence of such substances or a failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination could
materially and adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property.
In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local environmental,
health and safety laws, including laws governing the management of wastes and underground and
aboveground storage tanks. Noncompliance with these environmental, health and safety laws could
subject us to liability. Changes in laws could increase the potential costs of compliance with
environmental laws, health and safety laws or increase liability for noncompliance. This may result
in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise materially and adversely affect our
operations.
As the owner or operator of real property, we may also incur liability based on various
building conditions. For example, buildings and other structures on properties that we currently
own or operate or those we acquire or operate in the future contain, may contain, or may have
contained, asbestos-containing material, or ACM. Environmental, health and safety laws require that
ACM be properly managed and maintained and may impose fines or penalties on owners, operators or
employers for non-compliance with those requirements. These requirements include special
precautions, such as removal, abatement or air monitoring, if ACM would be disturbed during
maintenance, renovation or demolition of a building, potentially resulting in substantial costs. In
addition, we may be subject to liability for personal injury or property damage sustained as a
result of exposure to ACM or releases of ACM into the environment.
We cannot assure you that costs or liabilities incurred as a result of environmental issues
will not affect our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, or that such costs or
liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Our Properties May Contain or Develop Harmful Mold or Suffer from Other Indoor Air Quality
Issues, Which Could Lead to Liability for Adverse Health Effects or Property Damage or Cost for
Remediation. When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth
may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a
period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can
also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and
other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne
toxins or irritants can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms,
including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other
airborne contaminants at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation
program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants or to increase ventilation. In
addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to
liability from our tenants or others if property damage or personal injury occurs.
87
Compliance or Failure to Comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or Other
Safety Regulations and Requirements Could Result in Substantial Costs. The Americans with
Disabilities Act generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, be made
accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the
federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. From
time to time claims may be asserted against us with respect to some of our properties under
this Act. If, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial
alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of
access barriers, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such
as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements,
we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will
change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated
expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Real Estate Tax and Other Laws. Generally we do not directly pass through costs resulting from
compliance with or changes in real estate tax laws to residential property tenants. We also do not
generally pass through increases in income, service or other taxes, to tenants under leases. These
costs may adversely affect net operating income and the ability to make distributions to
stockholders. Similarly, compliance with or changes in (i) laws increasing the potential liability
for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other
conditions or (ii) rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating housing, such
as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, may result in
significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect funds from operations and the
ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Risk of Damage from Catastrophic Weather Events. Certain of our communities are located in the
general vicinity of active earthquake faults, mudslides and fires, and others where there are
hurricanes, tornadoes or risks of other inclement weather. The adverse weather events could cause
damage or losses that may be greater than insured levels. In the event of a loss in excess of
insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected community, as well as
anticipated future revenue from that community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any
mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. Any such loss could materially
and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
Actual or Threatened Terrorist Attacks May Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business and
Operating Results and Could Decrease the Value of Our Assets. Actual or threatened terrorist
attacks and other acts of violence or war could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operating results. Attacks that directly impact one or more of our apartment communities could
significantly affect our ability to operate those communities and thereby impair our ability to
achieve our expected results. Further, our insurance coverage may not cover all losses caused by a
terrorist attack. In addition, the adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future
attacks could have on the U.S. economy could similarly have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
We May Experience a Decline in the Fair Value of Our Assets and Be Forced to Recognize
Impairment Charges, Which Could Materially and Adversely Impact Our Financial Condition, Liquidity
and Results of Operations and the Market Price of UDRs Common Stock. A decline in the fair
value of our assets may require us to recognize an impairment against such assets under GAAP if we
were to determine that, with respect to any assets in unrealized loss positions, we do not have the
ability and intent to hold such assets to maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for
recovery to the amortized cost of such assets. If such a determination were to be made, we would
recognize unrealized losses through earnings and write down the amortized cost of such assets to a
new cost basis, based on the fair value of such assets on the date they are considered to be
impaired. Such impairment charges reflect non-cash losses at the time of recognition; subsequent
disposition or sale of such assets could further affect our future losses or gains, as they are
based on the difference between the sale price received and adjusted amortized cost of such assets
at the time of sale. If we are required to recognize asset impairment charges in the future, these
charges could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, results of
operations and the per share trading price of UDRs common stock.
88
Any Material Weaknesses Identified in Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Could Have
an Adverse Effect on UDRs Stock Price. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
requires us to evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify
one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose
investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could
have an adverse effect on UDRs stock price.
Our Success Depends on Our Senior Management. Our success depends upon the retention of our
senior management, whose continued service is not guaranteed. We may not be able to find qualified
replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services should no
longer be available to us. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management
team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We May be Adversely Affected by New Laws and Regulations. The United States Administration and
Congress have enacted, or called for consideration of, proposals relating to a variety of issues,
including with respect to health care, financial regulation reform, climate control, executive
compensation and others. We believe that these and other potential proposals could have varying
degrees of impact on us ranging from minimal to material. At this time, we are unable to predict
with certainty what level of impact specific proposals could have on us.
Certain rulemaking and administrative efforts that may have an impact on us focus principally
on the areas perceived as contributing to the global financial crisis and the recent economic
downturn. These initiatives have created a degree of uncertainty regarding the basic rules
governing the real estate industry and many other businesses that is unprecedented in the United
States at least since the wave of lawmaking and regulatory reform that followed in the wake of the
Great Depression. The federal legislative response in this area culminated in the enactment on July
21, 2010 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). Many
of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have extended implementation periods and delayed effective
dates and will require extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities; thus, the impact on us may
not be known for an extended period of time. The Dodd-Frank Act, including future rules
implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, along with other legislative and
regulatory proposals that are proposed or pending in the United States Congress, may limit our
revenues, impose fees or taxes on us, and/or intensify the regulatory framework in which we operate
in ways that are not currently identifiable.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public
disclosure in particular, including certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder, have created uncertainty for public companies like ours and
could significantly increase the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets.
Because we are committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial
reporting, corporate governance and public disclosure, our management team will need to devote
significant time and financial resources to comply with these evolving standards for public
companies. We intend to continue to invest appropriate resources to comply with both existing and
evolving standards, and this investment has resulted and will likely continue to result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from
revenue generating activities to compliance activities.
Changes in the System for Establishing U.S. Accounting Standards May Materially and Adversely
Affect Our Reported Results of Operations. Accounting for public companies in the United States has
historically been conducted in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as in
effect in the United States (GAAP). GAAP is established by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (the FASB), an independent body whose standards are recognized by the SEC as authoritative
for publicly held companies. The International Accounting Standards Board (the IASB) is a
London-based independent board established in 2001 and charged with the development of
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS generally reflects accounting practices
that prevail in Europe and in developed nations around the world.
IFRS differs in material respects from GAAP. Among other things, IFRS has historically relied
more on fair value models of accounting for assets and liabilities than GAAP. Fair value models
are based on periodic revaluation of assets and liabilities, often resulting in fluctuations in
such values as compared to GAAP, which relies more frequently on historical cost as the basis for
asset and liability valuation.
89
We are monitoring the SECs activity with respect to the proposed adoption of IFRS by United
States public companies. It is unclear at this time how the SEC will propose that GAAP and IFRS be
harmonized if the proposed change is adopted. In addition, switching to a new method of accounting
and adopting IFRS will be a complex undertaking. We may need to develop new systems and controls
based on the principles of IFRS. Since these are new endeavors, and the precise requirements of the
pronouncements ultimately to be adopted are not now known, the magnitude of costs associated with
this conversion are uncertain.
We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of IFRS on our financial position and
results of operations. Such evaluation cannot be completed, however, without more clarity regarding
the specific IFRS standards that will be adopted. Until there is more certainty with respect to the
IFRS standards to be adopted, prospective investors should consider that our conversion to IFRS
could have a material adverse impact on our reported results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financings
Insufficient Cash Flow Could Affect Our Debt Financing and Create Refinancing Risk. We are
subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our operating
income and cash flow will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, or
could restrict our borrowing capacity under our line of credit due to debt covenant restraints.
Sufficient cash flow may not be available to make all required principal payments and still satisfy
UDRs distribution requirements to maintain its status as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes. In addition, the full limits of our line of credit may not be available to us if our
operating performance falls outside the constraints of our debt covenants. We are also likely to
need to refinance substantially all of our outstanding debt as it matures. We may not be able to
refinance existing debt, or the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of
the existing debt, which could create pressures to sell assets or to issue additional equity when
we would otherwise not choose to do so. In addition, our failure to comply with our debt covenants
could result in a requirement to repay our indebtedness prior to its maturity, which could have an
adverse effect on our cash flow, increase our financing costs and impact our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Failure to Generate Sufficient Revenue Could Impair Debt Service Payments and Distributions to
Stockholders. If our apartment communities do not generate sufficient net rental income to meet
rental expenses, our ability to make required payments of interest and principal on our debt
securities and to pay distributions to UDRs stockholders will be adversely affected. The
following factors, among others, may affect the net rental income generated by our apartment
communities:
|
|
|
the national and local economies; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of apartment homes; |
|
|
|
|
tenants perceptions of the safety, convenience, and attractiveness of our communities
and the neighborhoods where they are located; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance; |
|
|
|
|
rental expenses, including real estate taxes and utilities; |
|
|
|
|
competition from other apartment communities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and the related costs of compliance; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in tax and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other
laws regulating multi-family housing. |
90
Expenses associated with our investment in an apartment community, such as debt service, real
estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a
reduction in rental income from that community. If a community is mortgaged to secure payment of
debt and we are unable to make the mortgage payments, we could sustain a loss as a result of
foreclosure on the community or the exercise of other remedies by the mortgage holder.
Debt Level May Be Increased. Our current debt policy does not contain any limitations on the
level of debt that we may incur, although our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our
bank and other credit agreements. We manage our debt to be in compliance with these debt covenants,
but subject to compliance with these covenants, we may increase the amount of our debt at any time
without a concurrent improvement in our ability to service the additional debt.
Financing May Not Be Available and Could Be Dilutive. Our ability to execute our business
strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines
of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including common and
preferred equity. We and other companies in the real estate industry have experienced limited
availability of financing from time to time. If we issue additional equity securities to finance
developments and acquisitions instead of incurring debt, the interests of our existing stockholders
could be diluted.
Disruptions in Financial Markets May Adversely Impact Availability and Cost of Credit and Have
Other Adverse Effects on Us and the Market Price of Our Stock. Our ability to make scheduled
payments or to refinance debt obligations will depend on our operating and financial performance,
which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other
factors beyond our control. During the past few years, the United States stock and credit markets
have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which have
caused market prices of many stocks to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt
financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the
financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive, and in some cases have
resulted in the unavailability of financing. The recent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating and the
ongoing European debt crisis have contributed to the instability in global credit markets.
Continued uncertainty in the stock and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access
additional financing for acquisitions, development of our properties and other purposes at
reasonable terms, which may negatively affect our business. Additionally, due to this uncertainty,
we may be unable to refinance our existing indebtedness or the terms of any refinancing may not be
as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness. If we are not successful in refinancing
this debt when it becomes due, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms,
which might adversely affect our ability to service other debt and to meet our other obligations. A
prolonged downturn in the financial markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially
less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. These events
also may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of UDRs common or preferred stock. The disruptions in the financial markets have had and may
continue to have a material adverse effect on the market value of UDRs common shares and
other adverse effects on us and our business.
Prospective buyers of our properties may also experience difficulty in obtaining debt
financing which might make it more difficult for us to sell properties at acceptable pricing
levels. Tightening of credit in financial markets and high unemployment rates may also adversely
affect the ability of tenants to meet their lease obligations and for us to continue increasing
rents on a prospective basis. Disruptions in the credit and financial markets may also have other
adverse effects on us and the overall economy.
A Change in U.S. Government Policy Regarding Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac Could Have a Material
Adverse Impact on Our Business. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are a major source of financing for
secured multifamily rental real estate. We and other multifamily companies depend heavily on Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac to finance growth by purchasing or guaranteeing apartment loans. In September
2008, the U.S. government assumed control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and placed both companies
into a government conservatorship under the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The Administration has
proposed potential options for the future of mortgage finance in the U.S. that could involve the
phase out of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. While we believe Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will continue
to provide liquidity to our sector, should they discontinue doing so, have their mandates changed
or reduced or be disbanded or reorganized by the government, it would significantly reduce our
access to debt capital and adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance existing
indebtedness at competitive rates and it may adversely affect our ability to sale assets.
Uncertainty in the future activity and involvement of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a source of
financing could negatively impact our ability to make acquisitions and make it more difficult or
not possible for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the price we receive for properties
that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of debt financing or
difficulties in obtaining debt financing.
91
The Soundness of Financial Institutions Could Adversely Affect Us. We have relationships with
many financial institutions, including lenders under our credit facilities, and, from time to time,
we execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. As a result,
defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, financial institutions or the financial services
industry generally, could result in losses or defaults by these institutions. In the event that the
volatility of the financial markets adversely affects these financial institutions or
counterparties, we or other parties to the transactions with us may be unable to complete
transactions as intended, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Changing Interest Rates Could Increase Interest Costs and Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and
the Market Price of Our Securities. We currently have, and expect to incur in the future,
interest-bearing debt at rates that vary with market interest rates. As of September 30, 2011, UDR had approximately $510.0 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding, which constitutes
approximately 13% of total outstanding indebtedness as of such date. As of September 30, 2011, the
Operating Partnership had approximately $240.4 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding,
which constitutes approximately 19% of total outstanding indebtedness to third parties as of such
date. An increase in interest rates would increase our interest expenses and increase the costs of
refinancing existing indebtedness and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could
adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service our debt and to make distributions to
security holders. The effect of prolonged interest rate increases could negatively impact our
ability to make acquisitions and develop properties. In addition, an increase in market interest
rates may lead our security holders to demand a higher annual yield, which could adversely affect
the market price of UDRs common and preferred stock and debt securities.
Interest Rate Hedging Contracts May Be Ineffective and May Result in Material Charges. From
time to time when we anticipate issuing debt securities, we may seek to limit our exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates during the period prior to the pricing of the securities by entering
into interest rate hedging contracts. We may do this to increase the predictability of our
financing costs. Also, from time to time we may rely on interest rate hedging contracts to limit
our exposure under variable rate debt to unfavorable changes in market interest rates. If the terms
of new debt securities are not within the parameters of, or market interest rates fall below that
which we incur under a particular interest rate hedging contract, the contract is ineffective.
Furthermore, the settlement of interest rate hedging contracts has involved and may in the future
involve material charges. In addition, our use of interest rate hedging arrangements may expose us
to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to
honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no
strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There
can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have desired beneficial impact on our results
of operations or financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves
costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.
Risks Related to Tax Laws
We Would Incur Adverse Tax Consequences if UDR Failed to Qualify as a REIT. UDR
has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. Our qualification as a REIT requires us to
satisfy numerous requirements, some on an annual and quarterly basis, established under highly
technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative
interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not
entirely within our control. We intend that our current organization and method of operation enable
us to continue to qualify as a REIT, but we may not so qualify or we may not be able to remain so
qualified in the future. In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other
corporations and the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time,
potentially with retroactive effect. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or
adversely affect our stockholders.
92
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate
rates, and would not be allowed to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our
taxable income. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory
provisions, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which
we first failed to qualify as a REIT. The additional tax liability from the failure to qualify as a
REIT would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to our
stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities
and our ability to
raise additional capital. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to
our stockholders. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will continue to be subject to
certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.
REITs May Pay a Portion of Dividends in Common Stock. In December 2009, the Internal Revenue
Service issued Revenue Procedure 2010-12, which expanded previously issued temporary guidance
relating to certain stock distributions made by publicly traded REITs to satisfy their tax-related
distribution requirements. This expanded temporary guidance is intended to permit REITs to limit
cash distributions in order to maintain liquidity during the current downturn in economic
conditions. Under this expanded guidance, for stock dividends declared on or after January 1, 2008
and before December 31, 2012, with respect to a taxable year ending on or before December 31, 2011,
the Internal Revenue Service will treat a distribution of stock by a publicly traded REIT, pursuant
to certain stockholder elections to receive either stock or cash, as a taxable distribution of
property, provided that, among other conditions, (i) the total amount of cash available for
distribution is not less than 10% of the aggregate declared distribution, and (ii) if too many
stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro
rata amount of cash corresponding to its respective entitlement under the declaration, but in no
event will any such electing stockholder receive less than 10% of the stockholders entire
entitlement in money. The amount of such stock distribution will generally be treated as equal to
the amount of cash that could have been received instead. If we pay a portion of our dividends in
shares of UDRs common stock pursuant to this temporary guidance, our stockholders may
receive less cash than they received in distributions in prior years and the market value of our
securities may decline.
UDR May Conduct a Portion of Our Business Through Taxable REIT Subsidiaries, Which are
Subject to Certain Tax Risks. We have established several taxable REIT subsidiaries. Despite UDRs qualification as a REIT, its taxable REIT subsidiaries must pay income tax on their taxable
income. In addition, we must comply with various tests to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes, and our income from and investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries generally
do not constitute permissible income and investments for these tests. While we will attempt to
ensure that our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries will not adversely affect our REIT
qualification, we cannot provide assurance that we will successfully achieve that result.
Furthermore, we may be subject to a 100% penalty tax, we may jeopardize our ability to retain
future gains on real property sales, or our taxable REIT subsidiaries may be denied deductions, to
the extent our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not deemed to be arms length in
nature or are otherwise not respected.
REIT Distribution Requirements Limit Our Available Cash. As a REIT, UDR is subject to
annual distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we retain for other business
purposes, including amounts to fund our growth. We generally must distribute annually at least 90%
of our net REIT taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed
earnings not to be subject to corporate income tax. We intend to make distributions to our
stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between
the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or
borrow funds on a short-term or long-term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the
Code.
Certain Property Transfers May Generate Prohibited Transaction Income, Resulting in a Penalty
Tax on Gain Attributable to the Transaction. From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise
dispose of some of our properties. Under the Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties
that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business
would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction and subject to a 100% penalty tax. Since
we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or
disposals of property are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment
purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the
particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or
disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. If the Internal Revenue Service were to
argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction,
then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited
transaction and we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales. In
addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect UDRs ability to
satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
93
We Could Face Possible State and Local Tax Audits and Adverse Changes in State and Local Tax
Laws. As discussed in the risk factors above, because UDR is organized and qualifies as a
REIT it is generally not subject
to federal income taxes, but it is subject to certain state and local taxes. From time to
time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an
increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which
we own apartment communities may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes. If
such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional state and local taxes. These increased tax
costs could adversely affect our financial condition and the amount of cash available for the
payment of distributions to our stockholders. In the normal course of business, entities through
which we own real estate may also become subject to tax audits. If such entities become subject to
state or local tax audits, the ultimate result of such audits could have an adverse effect on our
financial condition.
The Operating Partnership Intends to Qualify as a Partnership, But Cannot Guarantee That It
Will Qualify. The Operating Partnership intends to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes at any such time that the Operating Partnership admits additional limited partners other
than UDR. If classified as a partnership, the Operating Partnership generally will not be a
taxable entity and will not incur federal income tax liability. However, the Operating Partnership
would be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes if it were a publicly traded
partnership, unless at least 90% of the Operating Partnerships income was qualifying income as
defined in the Code. A publicly traded partnership is a partnership whose partnership interests
are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market (or
the substantial equivalent thereof). Although the Operating Partnerships partnership units are not
traded on an established securities market, because of the redemption right, the Operating
Partnerships units held by limited partners could be viewed as readily tradable on a secondary
market (or the substantial equivalent thereof), and the Operating Partnership may not qualify for
one of the safe harbors under the applicable tax regulations. Qualifying income for the 90% test
generally includes passive income, such as real property rents, dividends and interest. The income
requirements applicable to REITs and the definition of qualifying income for purposes of this 90%
test are similar in most respects. The Operating Partnership may not meet this qualifying income
test. If the Operating Partnership were to be taxed as a corporation, it would incur substantial
tax liabilities, and UDR would then fail to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes, unless it
qualified for relief under certain statutory savings provisions, and our ability to raise
additional capital would be impaired.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Ownership of UDRs Stock
Changes in Market Conditions and Volatility of Stock Prices Could Adversely Affect the Market
Price of UDRs Common Stock. The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE), on which we list UDRs common stock, have continued to experience significant price
and volume fluctuations. As a result, the market price of UDRs common stock could be
similarly volatile, and investors in UDRs common stock may experience a decrease in the
value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. In
addition to the risks listed in this Risk Factors section, a number of factors could negatively
affect the price per share of UDRs common stock, including:
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in UDRs quarterly operating results or dividends
or UDRs payment of dividends in shares of UDRs stock; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties or inability to access capital or extend or refinance existing debt; |
94
|
|
|
decreasing (or uncertainty in) real estate valuations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies; |
|
|
|
|
publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry; |
|
|
|
|
the general reputation of real estate investment trusts and the attractiveness of their
equity securities in comparison to other equity securities (including securities issued by
other real estate companies); |
|
|
|
|
general stock and bond market conditions, including changes in interest rates on fixed
income securities, that may lead prospective purchasers of UDRs stock to demand a
higher annual yield from future dividends; |
|
|
|
|
a change in analyst ratings; |
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key management personnel; |
|
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future; |
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community; |
|
|
|
|
terrorist activity which may adversely affect the markets in which UDRs
securities trade, possibly increasing market volatility and causing the further erosion of
business and consumer confidence and spending; |
|
|
|
|
failure to qualify as a REIT; |
|
|
|
|
strategic decisions by us or by our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestments,
spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
failure to satisfy listing requirements of the NYSE; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulatory action and changes in tax laws; and |
|
|
|
|
the issuance of additional shares of UDRs common stock, or the perception that
such sales might occur, including under UDRs at-the-market equity distribution
program. |
Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control. These factors may cause the market
price of shares of UDRs common stock to decline, regardless of our financial condition,
results of operations, business or our prospects.
We May Change the Dividend Policy for UDRs Common Stock in the Future. The decision to
declare and pay dividends on UDRs common stock, as well as the timing, amount and
composition of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on our earnings, funds from operations, liquidity, financial condition, capital
requirements, contractual prohibitions or other limitations under our indebtedness, the annual
distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, state law and such other factors
as our board of directors considers relevant. Any change in our dividend policy could have a
material adverse effect on the market price of UDRs common stock.
Maryland Law May Limit the Ability of a Third Party to Acquire Control of Us, Which May Not be
in Our Stockholders Best Interests. Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third
party to acquire control of us. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws
which may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire our Company and of increasing the
difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our stockholders
best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business
combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of
our stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without our board of directors prior
approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after
the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders
representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast,
excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides
generally that a person who acquires shares of our equity stock that represents 10% (and certain
higher levels) of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless
approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote.
95
Limitations on Share Ownership and Limitations on the Ability of Our Stockholders to Effect a
Change in Control of Our Company Restricts the Transferability of Our Stock and May Prevent
Takeovers That are Beneficial to Our Stockholders. One of the requirements for maintenance of our
qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes is that no more than 50% in value of
our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or fewer individuals, including entities
specified in the Code, during the last half of any taxable year. Our charter contains ownership and
transfer restrictions relating to our stock primarily to assist us in complying with this and other
REIT ownership requirements; however, the restrictions may have the effect of preventing a change
of control, which does not threaten REIT status. These restrictions include a provision that
generally limits ownership by any person of more than 9.9% of the value of our outstanding equity
stock, unless our board of directors exempts the person from such ownership limitation, provided
that any such exemption shall not allow the person to exceed 13% of the value of our outstanding
equity stock. Absent such an exemption from our board of directors, the transfer of our stock to
any person in excess of the applicable ownership limit, or any transfer of shares of such stock in
violation of the ownership requirements of the Code for REITs, will be considered null and void,
and the intended transferee of such stock will acquire no rights in such shares. These provisions
of our charter may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing someone from taking control
of us, even though a change of control might involve a premium price for our stockholders or might
otherwise be in our stockholders best interests.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
From time to time the Company issues shares of the Companys common stock in exchange for operating
partnership units (OP Units) tendered to the Operating Partnership, for redemption in accordance
with the provisions of the Operating Partnerships limited partnership agreement. The holders of
limited partnership OP Units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a
portion of their limited partnership OP units in exchange for a cash payment based on the market
value of our common stock at the time of redemption. However, the Operating Partnerships
obligation to pay the cash amount is subject to the prior right of the Company to acquire such OP
Units in exchange for either the Cash Amount or the number of shares of the Companys common stock equal to
the number of OP Units being redeemed.
On July 13, 2011, the Company issued 1,998 shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units. On
September 7, 2011, the Company issued 561 shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units. Because
these shares of common stock were issued to accredited investors in transactions not involving a
public offering, the transaction is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in
accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The Company did not issue any other shares of UDR common stock upon redemption of OP Units during the three months ended September 30, 2011.
On August 31, 2011, the Company and the Operating Partnership closed on the acquisition of a
multifamily apartment community referred to as 95 Wall. The community was acquired for $328.9
million, which included the issuance of 1,802,239 OP Units for the contribution of the 95 Wall to
the Operating Partnership. The OP Units were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The issuance of the OP Units
was not effected using any form of general advertising or general solicitation and the issuance was
made to only a qualified investor.
96
Repurchase of Equity Securities
In February 2006, UDRs Board of Directors authorized a 10 million share repurchase program. In
January 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a new 15 million share repurchase program. Under
the two share repurchase programs, UDR may repurchase shares of our common stock in open market
purchases, block purchases, privately
negotiated transactions or otherwise. As reflected in the table below, no shares of common
stock were repurchased under these programs during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price per |
|
|
of Publicly Announced |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
August 1, 2011 through August 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
September 1, 2011 through September
30 , 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This number reflects the amount of shares that were available for purchase under our
10,000,000 share repurchase program authorized in February 2006 and our 15,000,000 share
repurchase program authorized in January 2008. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(REMOVED AND RESERVED) |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
There is no other information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the
quarter ended September 30, 2011, that was not previously disclosed in a Form 8-K.
The exhibits filed or furnished with this Report are set forth in the Exhibit Index.
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the registrants
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
(registrant)
|
|
Date: November 3, 2011 |
/s/ David L. Messenger
|
|
|
David L. Messenger |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(duly authorized officer, principal financial
officer
and chief accounting officer) |
|
|
|
United Dominion Realty, L.P.
(registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
|
UDR, Inc., its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2011 |
/s/ David L. Messenger
|
|
|
David L. Messenger
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(duly authorized officer, principal financial
officer and chief accounting officer) |
|
98
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Restatement of UDR, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.09 to UDR,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2005 and filed with the SEC on August 1,
2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Restatement of UDR, Inc. dated and filed with the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland on March 14, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 14, 2007 and filed with the SEC on March 15, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary relating to UDR, Inc.s 6.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock dated and filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of
the State of Maryland on May 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to UDR,
Inc.s Form 8-A Registration Statement dated and filed with the SEC on May 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Restatement of UDR, Inc. dated and filed with the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland on August 30, 2011
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
and filed with the SEC on September 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P. dated February 19, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to United Dominion Realty, L.P.s Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated and filed with the SEC on
October 15, 2010). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P.
dated as of February 23, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to UDR, Inc.s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. dated June 24, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.06 to
UDR, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. dated February 23, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to UDR, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. dated February 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
UDR, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. dated December 27, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25
to UDR, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. dated March 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to
UDR, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 9, 2008 and filed with the SEC on December 10, 2008). |
99
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of March 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 18, 2009 and filed with the SEC
on March 19, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of November 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2010 and filed with the
SEC on November 18, 2010). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of UDR, Inc. (as amended through May 12, 2011) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on May 13, 2011). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement among UDR, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities,
LLC, as Representatives of the several underwriters, dated July 13, 2011 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with
the SEC on July 13, 2011). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
ATM Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement among UDR, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, dated September 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to UDR, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC on
September 1, 2011). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement among UDR, Inc., United Dominion Realty,
L.P., as Guarantor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Morgan Stanley
& Co. Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Agents, dated September 1, 2011,
with respect to the issue and sale by UDR, Inc. of its Medium-Term Notes, Series A Due
Nine Months or More From Date of Issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to UDR,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC on September 1, 2011). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
of UDR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges of United Dominion Realty, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of UDR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of UDR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of United Dominion Realty, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of United Dominion Realty, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of UDR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of UDR, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of United Dominion Realty, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of United Dominion Realty, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i)
consolidated balance sheets of UDR, Inc., (ii) consolidated statements of operations of
UDR, Inc., (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows of UDR, Inc., (iv) consolidated
statements of equity and comprehensive income/(loss) of UDR, Inc., (v) notes to
consolidated financial statements of UDR, Inc, (vi) consolidated balance sheets of United
Dominion Realty, L.P., (vii) consolidated statements of operations of United Dominion
Realty, L.P., (viii) consolidated statements of cash flows of United Dominion Realty,
L.P., (ix) consolidated statements of capital and comprehensive income/(loss) of United
Dominion Realty, L.P., and (x) notes to consolidated financial statements of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. |
100