e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-6402-1
Service Corporation
International
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
74-1488375
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77019
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
713/522-5141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large Accelerated
Filer þ Accelerated
Filer o Non-accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming that the
registrants only affiliates are its officers and
directors) was $2,236,208,053 based upon a closing market price
of $8.14 on June 30, 2006 of a share of common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Tape.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock as of February 20, 2007 was 293,476,937 (net of
treasury shares)
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement in connection
with its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III)
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are
used throughout this report, and have the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
after the death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced outer burial
container intended to protect the casket against the weight of
the earth.
Cash Overrides Funds received based on
achieving certain dollar volume targets of life insurance
policies.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to
bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions paid
to the General Agency (GA) for life insurance policies or
annuities sold to preneed customers for the purpose of funding
preneed funeral arrangements. The commission rate paid is
determined based on the product type sold, the length of payment
terms, and the age of the insured/annuitant. The commission rate
is applied to the face amount of the policy purchased to
determine the commission amount payable to the GA.
GA revenues are recognized as funeral revenues when the
insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third
party insurance provider is completed.
Interment The burial or final placement of
human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An outer burial receptacle
constructed of concrete and reinforced steel, which is usually
pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying the remains in
a particular burial space, crypt, or niche. Permanent burial
markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity At the time of death. This is the
point at which preneed contracts are converted to atneed
contracts.
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is
designed to house caskets and cremation urns.
Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust
fund used for the maintenance and upkeep of burial spaces within
a cemetery.
Preneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
made prior to the time of death.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from
unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery contractual
arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and
preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
3
PART I
General
Service Corporation International (SCI) is North Americas
leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic
scale and reach. At December 31, 2006, we operated 1,613
funeral service locations and 452 cemeteries, (including 232
combination locations) in North America, which are
geographically diversified across 45 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our
funeral segment also includes the operations of Kenyon
International Emergency Services, a subsidiary that specializes
in providing disaster management services in mass fatality
incidents as well as training, planning, and Crisis
Communications consulting services, and the operations of 14
funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic
values and conditions are conducive to a sale. As part of the
Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) transaction, we acquired an
insurance business for which we have commenced a plan to divest.
The operations of this business are presented as discontinued
operations in our consolidated statement of operations and as
assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in on our
consolidated balance sheet. In addition, we own a minority
interest in AKH Luxco, S.C.A., more commonly known as Pompes
Funebres Génerales (PFG), Frances leading provider of
funeral services.
History
We were incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Prior to 1999, we
focused on the acquisition and consolidation of independent
funeral homes and cemeteries in the fragmented deathcare
industry in North America. During the 1990s, we also expanded
our operations through acquisitions in Europe, Australia, South
America; and the Pacific Rim. During the mid to late 1990s,
acquisitions of deathcare facilities became extremely
competitive resulting in increased prices for acquisitions and
substantially reduced returns on invested capital. In 1999, we
significantly reduced our level of acquisition activity and
began to focus on identifying and addressing non-strategic or
underperforming businesses.
This focus resulted in the divestiture of several North America
and international operations beginning in 2001. During 2001 and
2002, we completed joint ventures of operations in Australia,
the United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal. In 2003, we sold our
equity investment in our operations in Australia, Spain, and
Portugal. During 2004, we sold our funeral operations in France
and obtained a minority interest in the acquiring entity. We
also sold our minority interest equity investment in the United
Kingdom. During 2005, we divested of all of our operations in
Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile. During 2006, we sold our funeral
service location in Singapore, leaving our operations in Germany
as our sole remaining funeral service locations outside of North
America. We may pursue discussions with various third parties
concerning the sale or joint venture of our operations in
Germany.
In 2006, as part of our strategy to enhance our position as
North Americas premier funeral and cemetery provider, we
acquired Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash. The
purchase price of $1.2 billion includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. Alderwoods properties, which include 578
funeral service locations, 70 cemeteries, and 63 combination
locations, have been substantially integrated into our
operations at December 31, 2006. These properties are
operated in the same manner as our incumbent properties, under
our leadership, and are reported in the appropriate reporting
segment (funeral or cemetery) in our consolidated financial
statements.
Funeral
and Cemetery Operations
Worldwide, we have 1,627 funeral service locations and 452
cemeteries (including 232 combination locations) covering
45 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Germany. See Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for financial information about our business segments and
geographic areas.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles, and preparation and embalming
4
services. Funeral related merchandise, including caskets, burial
vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers and other ancillary
products and services, is sold at funeral service locations. Our
cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights, including
mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery
related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze
memorials, burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization
products, merchandise installations, and burial openings and
closings. We also sell preneed funeral and cemetery preneed
products and services whereby a customer contractually agrees to
the terms of certain products and services to be delivered and
performed in the future.
Funeral service/cemetery combination locations are those
businesses in which a funeral service location is physically
located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Certain
combination locations consist of multiple cemeteries combined
with one funeral home. Combination locations allow certain
facility, personnel, and equipment costs to be shared between
the funeral service location and cemetery. Such combination
facilities typically can be cost competitive and have higher
gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery operations were
operated separately. Combination locations also create synergies
between funeral and cemetery sales force personnel and give
families added convenience to purchase both funeral and cemetery
products and services at a single location. With the acquisition
of Alderwoods, we acquired Rose Hills, which is the largest
combination operation in the United States, performing
approximately 5,000 calls and 9,000 interments per year.
Our operations in the United States and Canada are organized
into 37 major markets and 45 middle markets (including eight
Hispana markets). Each market is led by a market director with
responsibility for funeral
and/or
cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the
funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as
personnel, preparation services, and vehicles. There are four
market support centers in North America to assist market
directors with financial, administrative, pricing, and human
resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston,
Miami, New York, and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the
support centers are to help facilitate the execution of
corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field
and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the
implementation of policies and procedures.
The following table (which includes businesses
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2006) provides the number of our
funeral homes, cemeteries, and combination locations by country,
and by state, territory, or province:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Alaska
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
California
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Maine
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Montana
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
New York
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
New Brunswick
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Quebec
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes businesses held for sale at December 31, 2006. |
We believe we have satisfactory title to the properties owned
and used in our business, subject to various liens, encumbrances
and easements, which are incidental to ownership rights and uses
and do not materially detract from
6
the value of the property. We also lease a number of facilities
that we use in our business under both capital and operating
leases.
At December 31, 2006, we owned approximately 88% of the
real estate and buildings used at our facilities and the
remainder of the facilities were leased. At December 31,
2006, our 452 cemeteries contained a total of approximately
32,366 acres, of which approximately 62% was developed.
A map of our locations in North America is presented below:
Competition
Although there are several public companies that own funeral
homes and cemeteries, the majority of deathcare businesses are
locally-owned, independent operations. We estimate that our
funeral and cemetery market share (including a full year of
Alderwoods operations) is approximately 14% based on industry
revenue for 2005. The position of a single funeral home or
cemetery in any community is a function of the name, reputation,
and location of that funeral home or cemetery, although
competitive pricing, professional service and attention, and
well-maintained locations are also important.
We believe we have an unparalleled network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries that offer high quality products and
services at prices that are competitive with local competing
funeral homes, cemeteries, and retail locations. Within this
network, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate
under various names as most operations were acquired as existing
businesses. We have branded our funeral operations in North
America under the name Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe our national branding strategy gives us a strategic
advantage and identity in the industry. While this branding
process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network
of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names
associated with acquired operations, and their inherent goodwill
and heritage, generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity
Memorial®
provider.
Employees
At December 31, 2006, we employed 14,454 (14,411 in North
America) individuals on a full time basis and 8,169 (8,165 in
North America) individuals on a part time basis. Of the full
time employees, 13,873 were employed in the funeral and cemetery
operations and 581 were employed in corporate or other overhead
activities and services. All eligible employees in the United
States who so elect are covered by our group health and life
insurance
7
plans. Eligible employees in the United States are participants
in retirement plans of SCI or various subsidiaries, while
international employees are covered by other SCI (or SCI
subsidiary) defined or government mandated benefit plans.
Approximately 3.5% of our employees in North America are
represented by unions. Although labor disputes are experienced
from time to time, relations with employees are generally
considered favorable.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, including extensive regulations
concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery
products and services and various other aspects of our business.
We strive to comply in all material respects with the provisions
of these laws, ordinances and regulations. Since 1984, we have
operated in the United States under the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) comprehensive trade regulation rule for the funeral
industry. The rule contains requirements for funeral industry
practices, including extensive price and other affirmative
disclosures and imposes mandatory itemization of funeral goods
and services.
Other
Our corporate headquarters are located at 1929 Allen Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77019. The property consists of approximately
127,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square
feet of parking space. We own and utilize three buildings
located in Houston, Texas for corporate activities containing a
total of approximately 238,000 square feet of office space.
As a result of the acquisition of Alderwoods, we also lease
approximately 71,000 square feet of office space located in
Burnaby, British Columbia, which we expect to sublease during
2007.
We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our
annual, quarterly and current reports and any amendments to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after
electronically filing such reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our website is
http://www.sci-corp.com and our telephone number is
(713) 522-5141.
The SEC also maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC
at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Each of our Board of Directors standing committee
charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of
Ethics for Board Members, and our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees are available, free of charge, through our website
or, upon request, in print. We will post on our internet website
all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees, which are required to be disclosed by applicable
law and rules of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
Cautionary
Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this
Form 10-K
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may be accompanied by words such as
believe, estimate, project,
expect, anticipate, or
predict that convey the uncertainty of future events
or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we
believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could
cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and
in any other documents or oral presentations made by, or on
behalf of, the Company. These factors are discussed below. We
assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by the Company, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
8
Our
ability to execute our business plan depends on many factors,
many of which are beyond our control.
Our strategic plan is focused on cost management and the
development of key revenue initiatives designed to generate
future internal growth in our core funeral and cemetery
operations. Many of the factors necessary for the execution of
our strategic plan, such as the number of deaths, are beyond our
control. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to
execute any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to execute any
or all of the strategic plan could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
We may
fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of
Alderwoods.
The success of the acquisition of Alderwoods will depend, in
part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings
from shared corporate and administrative areas, the
rationalization of duplicative expenses, and the realization of
revenue growth opportunities. However, to realize the
anticipated benefits from the acquisition, we must successfully
combine the businesses in a manner that permits those costs
savings and revenue increases to be realized. If we are not able
to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all
or may take longer or cost more to realize than expected. It is
possible that the integration process could result in the loss
of valuable employees, the disruption of ongoing businesses or
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices,
and policies that could adversely impact our operations.
The
integration of Alderwoods may prove disruptive and could result
in the combined business failing to meet our
expectations.
The process of integrating the operations of Alderwoods may
require a disproportionate amount of resources and management
attention. Our future operations and cash flow will depend
largely upon our ability to operate the former Alderwoods
locations efficiently, achieve the strategic operating
objectives for our business and realize significant cost savings
and synergies. Our management team may encounter unforeseen
difficulties in managing the integration. In order to
successfully combine and operate our businesses, our management
team will need to focus on realizing anticipated synergies,
revenue increases, and cost savings on a timely basis while
maintaining the efficiency of our operations. Any substantial
diversion of management attention or difficulties in operating
the combined business could affect our revenues and ability to
achieve operational, financial, and strategic objectives.
Our
credit agreements and debt securities contain covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions.
Our credit agreements and debt securities contain, among other
things, various affirmative and negative covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might
otherwise be considered beneficial to us. These covenants limit,
among other things, our and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
Incur additional secured indebtedness (including guarantee
obligations);
|
|
|
|
Create liens on assets;
|
|
|
|
Engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
Enter into sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
Engage in mergers, liquidations, and dissolutions;
|
|
|
|
Sell assets;
|
|
|
|
Enter into leases;
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends, distributions, and other payments in respect of
capital stock and purchase our capital stock in the open market;
|
|
|
|
Make investments, loans, or advances;
|
|
|
|
Repay subordinated indebtedness or amend the agreements relating
thereto;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Change our fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
Create restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Change our lines of business.
|
Our bank credit facility also requires us to maintain certain
leverage and interest coverage ratios. See Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further information related to our bank credit facility.
If we
lost the ability to use surety bonding to support our preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery activities, we could have to make
material cash payments to fund certain trust
funds.
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf
as financial assurance or as required by existing state and
local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various
business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds
issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed
funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety
companies cancelled or did not renew our surety bonds, which are
generally renewed for twelve-month periods, we would be required
to either obtain replacement coverage or fund approximately
$278.6 million as of December 31, 2006 into
state-mandated trust accounts.
The
funeral home and cemetery industry continues to be increasingly
competitive.
In North America, the funeral and cemetery industry is
characterized by a large number of locally owned, independent
operations. To compete successfully, our funeral service
locations and cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high
professional standards in the industry, as well as offer
attractive products and services at competitive prices. In
addition, we must market the Company in such a manner as to
distinguish us from our competitors. We have historically
experienced price competition from independent funeral home and
cemetery operators, monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost
funeral providers, and other non-traditional providers of
services and merchandise. If we are unable to successfully
compete, our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows could be materially adversely affected.
Our
affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in
equity securities, fixed income securities and mutual funds,
which are affected by financial market conditions that are
beyond our control.
In connection with our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
merchandise and service sales, most affiliated funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities and
mutual funds. Our earnings and investment gains and losses on
these equity securities and mutual funds are affected by
financial market conditions that are beyond our control.
As of December 31, 2006, net unrealized appreciation in the
preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust
funds amounted to $24.0 million and $62.8 million,
respectively. Our perpetual care trust funds had net unrealized
appreciation of $39.6 million as of December 31, 2006.
The following table summarizes the investment returns excluding
fees on our trust funds for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Preneed funeral trust funds
|
|
|
8.8%
|
|
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
|
7.1%
|
|
Cemetery merchandise and services
trust funds
|
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
Perpetual care trust funds
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
8.6%
|
|
If earnings from our trust funds decline, we would likely
experience a decline in future revenues. In addition, if the
trust funds experienced significant investment losses, there
could be insufficient funds in the trusts to cover the costs of
delivering services and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in
the future. We would have to cover any such shortfall with cash
flows from operations, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
10
Increasing
death benefits related to preneed funeral contracts funded
through life insurance or annuity contracts may not cover future
increases in the cost of providing a price guaranteed funeral
service.
We sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts, we
receive in cash a general agency commission that typically
averages approximately 16% of the total sale from the third
party insurance company. Additionally, there is an increasing
death benefit associated with the contract of approximately
1% per year to be received in cash at the time the funeral
is performed. There is no guarantee that the increasing death
benefit will cover future increases in the cost of providing a
price-guaranteed funeral service, which could materially
adversely affect our future cash flows, revenues, and operating
margins.
Unfavorable
results of litigation could have a material adverse impact on
our financial statements.
As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits in the
ordinary course of our business. Adverse outcomes in some or all
of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages
or injunctive relief against us. While management currently
believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our
financial position or results of operations, litigation and
other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and
managements view of these matters may change in the
future. There exists the possibility of a material adverse
impact on our financial position and the results of operations
for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable final
outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
If the
number of deaths in our markets declines, our cash flows and
revenues may decrease.
If the number of deaths declines, the number of funeral services
and interments performed by us could decrease and our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
The
continuing upward trend in the number of cremations performed in
North America could result in lower revenue and gross profit
dollars.
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. However, we have seen a recent
reversal in the upward trend in our businesses as our strategic
pricing initiative and discounting policies have resulted in a
decline in highly-discounted, low-service cremation customers.
In our operations in North America during 2006 and 2005, 40.9%
of the comparable funeral services we performed were cremation
cases compared to 39.6% performed in 2004, respectively. We
expect this trend to continue in the near term. We also continue
to expand our cremation memorialization products and services
which has resulted in higher average sales for cremation
services. If we are unable to successfully expand our cremation
memorialization products and services, and cremations continue
to be a significant percentage of our funeral services, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected.
The
funeral home and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost
businesses.
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called
markets. Markets are geographical groups of funeral
service locations and cemeteries that share common resources
such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical
staff, motor vehicles and preneed sales personnel. Personnel
costs, the largest of our operating expenses, are the cost
components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We must
incur many of these costs regardless of the number of funeral
services or interments performed. Because we cannot necessarily
decrease these costs when we experience lower sales volumes, a
sales decline may cause margin percentages to decline at a
greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Regulation
and compliance could have a material adverse impact on our
financial results.
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of
11
funeral and cemetery products and services, and various other
aspects of our business. The impact of such regulations varies
depending on the location of our funeral and cemetery
operations. Violations of applicable laws could result in fines
or sanctions to us.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose
to amend or add regulations, which would increase costs and
decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state, local
and other regulatory agencies have considered and may enact
additional legislation or regulations that could affect the
deathcare industry, such as regulations that require more
liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of
products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use
surety bonding, increase trust requirements,
and/or
prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in
the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible
proposals could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and
customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care
of human remains is critical to our continued success.
Litigation and regulatory proceedings regarding these issues
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows. We are continually
monitoring and reviewing our operations in an effort to insure
that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations, and
standards and, where appropriate, taking appropriate corrective
action.
A
number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved.
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on
the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1999 through
2004 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years through
2005. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome
or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we
believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known
tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular
issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of
cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax
expense reported in the financial statements in the future.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
Information regarding properties is set forth in Item 1.
Business of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 15.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
12
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth as of February 28, 2007 the
name and age of each executive officer of the Company, the
office held, and the year first elected an officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Became
|
|
Officer Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
76
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
1962
|
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
41
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
48
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
|
1998
|
|
J. Daniel Garrison
|
|
55
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations
Support
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Philip Jacobs
|
|
52
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief
Marketing Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
55
|
|
Senior Vice President Middle
Market Operations
|
|
|
1998
|
|
James M. Shelger
|
|
57
|
|
Senior Vice President General
Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
1987
|
|
Eric D. Tanzberger
|
|
38
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2000
|
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
38
|
|
Senior Vice President Major Market
Operations
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
58
|
|
Vice President Corporate Controller
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Christopher H. Cruger
|
|
32
|
|
Vice President Business Development
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Jane D. Jones
|
|
51
|
|
Vice President Human Resources
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Albert R. Lohse
|
|
46
|
|
Vice President Litigation and Risk
Management
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Harris E. Loring, III
|
|
56
|
|
Vice President and Treasurer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Elisabeth G. Nash
|
|
45
|
|
Vice President Process and
Technology
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Donald R. Robinson
|
|
49
|
|
Vice President Supply Chain
Management
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons listed above have
been executive officers or employees for more than five years.
Mr. Waltrip is the founder, Chairman of the Company, and a
licensed funeral director. He grew up in his familys
funeral business and assumed management of the firm in the 1950s
after earning a Bachelors degree in Business
Administration from the University of Houston. He began buying
additional funeral homes in the 1960s, achieving cost
efficiencies by pooling their resources. At the end of 2006, the
network he began had grown to include more than 2,000 funeral
service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip took the
Company public in 1969. He has provided leadership to the
Company for over 40 years. In 2005, Mr. Waltrip
resigned as Chief Executive Officer, but he continues to serve
as Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Ryan joined the Company in June 1996 and served in a
variety of financial management roles within the Company. In
February 1999, Mr. Ryan was promoted to Vice President
International Finance. In November 2000, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer of European Operations based in Paris,
France. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan was appointed President and
Chief Operating Officer. In February 2005, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Ryan was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Ryan is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University
of Texas-Austin.
Mr. Webb joined the Company in 1991 when it acquired
Arlington Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery
consolidator, where he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior
to joining Arlington Corporation, Mr. Webb held various
executive financial and development roles at Days Inns of
America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Webb joined
the Companys corporate development group, which he later
led on a global basis before accepting operational
responsibility for the Companys Australian and Hispanic
businesses. Mr. Webb was
13
promoted to Vice President International Corporate Development
in February 1998 and was named Executive Vice President in July
2002. In February 2005, he was promoted to Chief Operating
Officer. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, where he
earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Garrison joined the Company in 1978 and worked in a
series of management positions until he was promoted to
President of the Southeastern Region in 1992. In 1998,
Mr. Garrison was promoted to Vice President International
Operations. In 2000, Mr. Garrison became Vice President
North American Cemetery Operations and was promoted to Vice
President Operations Services in August 2002. He assumed his
current position as Senior Vice President Operations Support in
February 2005. Mr. Garrison has a Bachelor of Science
degree in Administrative Management from Clemson University.
Mr. Jacobs joined SCI in 2007 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Jacobs was employed by CompUSA as Chief Marketing
Officer and held other management roles over the past
23 years at several of the nations top advertising
agencies, as well as client-side positions. Mr. Jacobs
holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of
Tennessee and a Masters degree from Vanderbilt University.
Mr. Mack joined the Company in 1973 as a resident director
after graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York.
He became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1987 and in
February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North
American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to
Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002 and
assumed the office of Senior Vice President Middle Market
Operations, his current position, in May 2004.
Mr. Shelger joined the Company in 1981 when it acquired IFS
Industries, a regional funeral and cemetery consolidator, where
he was then General Counsel. Mr. Shelger subsequently
served as counsel for SCIs cemetery division until 1991,
when he was appointed General Counsel. Mr. Shelger
currently serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of the Company. Mr. Shelger earned a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from the University of
Southern California in Los Angeles and a Juris Doctor from the
California Western School of Law in San Diego.
Mr. Tanzberger joined the Company in August 1996 as Manager
of Budgets & Financial Analysis. He was promoted to
Vice President Investor Relations and Assistant Corporate
Controller in January 2000 and to Corporate Controller in August
2002. In 2006, Mr. Tanzberger was promoted to the position
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant Corporate
Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation, an inland
waterway barge and tanker company, from January through August
1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Tanzberger is a Certified Public Accountant and a
graduate of the University of Notre Dame, where he earned a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined the Company
as an Area Vice President in 1996 when the Company merged with
his familys funeral business. Mr. Waring was
appointed Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and
was promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in
September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President
Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice
President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February
2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President
Major Market Operations. Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from Stetson
University in Deland, Florida, a degree in Mortuary Science from
Mt. Ida College and a Masters of Business Administration degree
from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
Mr. Beason joined SCI in July 2006 as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. Prior to joining SCI, he was an employee
of El Paso Corporation, a natural gas transmission and
production company. Mr. Beason joined El Paso in 1978
and held various accounting and reporting roles until 1993. From
1993 to 1996, he held the position of Sr. Vice President
Administration of Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, a wholly
owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation. From 1996 to
November 2005, Mr. Beason was Senior Vice President
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of El Paso
Corporation. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting degree from
Texas Tech University.
14
Mr. Cruger oversees Corporate Development, real estate, and
the Dignity
Memorial®
affiliate network of independent funeral homes. He initially
served the Company as a financial analyst in the corporate
development department from 1996 until 1999, when he left to
become Manager of Financial Analysis for R. H. Donnelley
Corporation. During 2000, he returned to SCI to focus on
international divestitures. From 2003 to February 2005, he
served as Managing Director of Corporate Development. In
February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President of Business
Development. Mr. Cruger graduated from Lehigh University
with a Bachelor of Science in Finance.
Mrs. Jones joined SCI in 2003 from Dynegy, Inc., where she
served as Vice President of Total Rewards. She oversees human
resources, training and education, and payroll and commission
services activities that assist approximately 20,000
employees in North America. Mrs. Jones was promoted to Vice
President Human Resources in February 2005. She holds a Bachelor
of Business Administration degree in Accounting with a minor in
Finance from Southern Methodist University. She is a Certified
Compensation Professional and is active in professional
organizations that include World at Work and the Society for
Human Resources Management.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of
Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of
major litigation issues for the Company. In 2004, Mr. Lohse
was promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at
McDade, Fogler, Maines & Lohse where he conducted a
general civil trial practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort
and commercial litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski.
Mr. Lohse received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Texas and a Juris Doctor from the
University of Houston Law Center.
Mr. Loring joined the Company in March 2000 as the Managing
Director, Tax and was promoted to Assistant Treasurer in May
2004. Before joining the Company, Mr. Loring was Director,
Tax at Stone & Webster, Inc. and held various corporate
tax and treasury positions in other companies over a twenty-five
year period. In February 2006, Mr. Loring was promoted to
Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Loring is a Certified
Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Business
Administration from Bryant College in North Smithfield, Rhode
Island and a Master of Science in Taxation from Bentley College,
Waltham, Massachusetts.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of
Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining
SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held
various senior management accounting and financial positions. In
2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Continuous
Process Improvement. Her primary responsibilities include
improving operating systems, reducing overhead costs, and
identifying and assisting in the implementation of initiatives
to improve operating profit margins and cash flow. She is a
graduate of Texas A&M University where she received a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Mr. Robinson joined SCI in 1996 as Director of Procurement.
Prior to joining the Company Mr. Robinson was employed by
Marathon Oil Company, where he spent 16 years in a variety
of procurement, logistics, and information technology positions.
In February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President Supply Chain
Management. Prior to this promotion, he was Managing Director of
Business Support Services, a position in which he oversaw fleet
management and office services; voice, travel, and shipping
services; and supply chain and purchasing activities.
Mr. Robinson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration with a minor in Computer Service from Taylor
University in Upland, Indiana.
Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors
and holds their office until a successor is elected and
qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the
manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Company. Each officer of
a subsidiary of the Company is elected by the subsidiarys
board of directors and holds their office until a successor is
elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or
removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Subsidiary.
15
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since May 14, 1974. On December 31, 2006, there were
5,345 holders of record of our common stock. In calculating the
number of shareholders, we consider clearing agencies and
security position listings as one shareholder for each agency or
listing. At December 31, 2006, we had
293,222,114 shares outstanding, net of 10,000 treasury
shares.
During 2006, we paid cash dividends totaling $29.4 million
and accrued $8.8 million for dividends paid on
January 31, 2007. While we intend to pay regular quarterly
cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent
dividends are subject to final determination by our Board of
Directors each quarter after its review of our financial
performance.
The table below shows our quarterly high and low closing common
stock prices for the two years ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
$
|
7.83
|
|
|
$
|
6.81
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
6.58
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
|
$
|
8.85
|
|
|
$
|
8.08
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
10.45
|
|
|
$
|
8.97
|
|
|
$
|
8.61
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
|
Options in our common stock are traded on the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCI.
For equity compensation plan information, see Part III of
this
Form 10-K.
On October 31, 2006, we issued 348 deferred common stock
equivalents or units pursuant to provisions regarding the
receipt of dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee
Plan to four non-employee directors. These issuances were
unregistered as they did not constitute a sale
within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Since 2004, we have repurchased a total of $363.3 million
of common stock at an average cost per share of $7.11. We did
not repurchase any of our common stock during the three months
ended December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, we had
$36.0 million authorized for share repurchases. In February
2007, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our share
repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to an
additional $164 million to repurchase our common stock. We
now have $200 million authorized by our Board of Directors
for share repurchases. As discussed in Item 1A, our new
credit agreement and debt securities contain covenants that
restrict our ability to repurchase our common stock.
16
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The table below contains selected consolidated financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2002 through
December 31, 2006. The statement of operations data
includes reclassifications of certain items to conform to
current period presentations with no impact on net income or
financial position.
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements included in this
Form 10-K.
This historical information is not necessarily indicative of
future results.
Selected
Consolidated Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,747.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,711.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,825.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,308.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,289.0
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
69.1
|
|
|
$
|
(91.5
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of tax(2)
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax(3)(4)(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(187.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(135.6
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
$
|
(127.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
110.7
|
|
|
$
|
85.1
|
|
|
$
|
(235.4
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.23
|
|
|
$
|
(.31
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
|
$
|
.23
|
|
|
$
|
(.31
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
|
$
|
.28
|
|
|
$
|
(.80
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
|
$
|
.28
|
|
|
$
|
(.80
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.105
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance
Sheet Data (at December 31):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,729.4
|
|
|
$
|
7,544.8
|
|
|
$
|
8,227.2
|
|
|
$
|
7,571.2
|
|
|
$
|
7,801.8
|
|
Long-term debt (less current
maturities), including capital leases
|
|
$
|
1,912.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,186.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,200.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,530.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,885.2
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,594.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,581.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,843.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,516.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,318.9
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
324.2
|
|
|
$
|
312.9
|
|
|
$
|
94.2
|
|
|
$
|
374.3
|
|
|
$
|
352.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Results for 2006 include operations acquired from Alderwoods
from November 28, 2006 to December 31, 2006. These
operations contributed $50.9 million to revenue,
$5.4 million to net income and $8.6 million to net
cash provided by operating activities during this period. For
more information regarding the Alderwoods acquisition, see
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 5. |
|
(2) |
|
Our operations in Singapore, which were sold in 2006 and in
Argentina, Uruguay and Chile, which were sold in 2005 have been
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
For more information regarding discontinued operations, see
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 21. |
17
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Results for 2006 and 2005 reflect our change in accounting for
direct selling costs related to preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts. Results for 2005 include a $187.5 million
charge, net of tax, for the cumulative effect of this change.
For more information regarding this accounting change, see
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 3. |
|
(4) |
|
On March 18, 2004, we implemented revised Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46R). Under the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation 46R (FIN 46R), we are
required to consolidate our preneed funeral and cemetery
merchandise and service trust assets, cemetery perpetual care
trusts, and certain cemeteries. As a result of this accounting
change, we recognized a cumulative effect charge of
$14.0 million, net of tax, in 2004. |
|
(5) |
|
Results for 2004, 2005, and 2006 reflect our change in
accounting for pension gains and losses. Results for 2004
include a $36.6 million charge, net of tax, for the
cumulative effect of this change. |
|
(6) |
|
Results for all periods presented reflect our change in
accounting for goodwill under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 152). Results for 2002 include
a $135.6 million charge, net of tax, for the cumulative
effect of this change. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The
Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. During
2006, we accomplished several key goals that we believe will
position us for continued growth in 2007.
In November 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $20.00 per
share in cash, resulting in a purchase price of
$1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. The following table sets forth the sources and
uses of funds related to the Alderwoods acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on Hand
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
150
|
|
Private Placement Notes
|
|
|
200
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Alderwoods equity
|
|
|
861
|
|
Repay Alderwoods debt
|
|
|
358
|
(1)
|
Repay SCI debt
|
|
|
139
|
|
Debt Costs
|
|
|
27
|
|
Transaction Cost
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Simultaneously with the transaction close, Alderwoods repaid
their existing indebtedness with funds advanced from us. We
assumed a remaining debt balance of approximately
$2 million. |
The acquisition of Alderwoods allows us to serve a number of
new, complementary areas, while enabling us to capitalize on
significant synergies and operating efficiencies. The
acquisition provides, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased scale. The acquisition combines the
two largest deathcare companies in North America, creating a
network of funeral homes and cemeteries across 45 states,
eight Canadian provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto
Rico;
|
|
|
|
Compelling synergies. We have identified
several areas where cost-saving synergies can be reasonably and
quickly realized, including the elimination of duplicate
information technology systems and infrastructure,
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
duplicate accounting, finance, legal and other systems,
overlapping management, and duplicate executive and public
company costs. Excluding one-time cash integration costs of
$39 million expected in 2007, we expect to achieve annual
pretax cost savings and revenue enhancements totaling
$90 million to $100 million within eighteen months of
closing the acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quickly materializing benefits. Former
Alderwoods operations contributed $8.9 million from
continuing operations before income tax and $8.6 million in
cash flow from operations from November 28, 2006 (the
acquisition date) to December 31, 2006.
|
Since August 2004, we have invested more than $360 million
in repurchasing our stock, and we have paid a quarterly cash
dividend since early 2005. We currently have over
$200 million authorized to repurchase our common stock. Our
financial stability is further enhanced by our $6.5 billion
backlog of future revenues at December 31, 2006, which is
the result of preneed funeral and cemetery sales. We have the
financial strength and flexibility to reward shareholders
through dividends while maintaining a prudent capital structure
and pursuing new opportunities for profitable growth.
Strategies
for Growth
In recent years, we have strengthened our balance sheet, lowered
our cost structure, introduced more efficient systems and
processes and strengthened our management team. We believe these
improvements, together with our acquisition of Alderwoods,
present us with significant opportunities to achieve future
growth. Our principal strategies are as follows:
Approach
the business by customer preference.
We believe customer attitudes and preferences are essential to
our business. We are replacing the industrys traditional
one-size-fits-all service approach with a flexible operating and
marketing strategy that categorizes customers according to
personal needs and preferences. Using this new approach, we are
tailoring our product and service offerings based on four
variables:
|
|
|
|
|
quality and prestige,
|
|
|
|
religious and ethnic customs,
|
|
|
|
convenience and location, and
|
|
|
|
price.
|
By identifying customers based on these variables, we can focus
our resources on the most profitable customer categories and
improve our marketing effectiveness. We continue to refine our
pricing, product and marketing strategies to support this
approach.
Consistent with this strategy, we have begun to analyze existing
business relationships to determine whether they align with our
strategic goals. As a result, we made certain local business
decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships and
activities in 2005 and 2006, which resulted in an initial
decrease in the number of total funeral services performed.
However, we also experienced significant improvements in both
average revenue per funeral service and gross margins. We expect
these improvements to continue into the future as we redeploy
resources to more profitable areas. We continue to analyze our
existing operations, including those newly acquired in the
Alderwoods acquisition, and may exit certain business
relationships or activities that do not fit our customer
segmentation strategy.
Realign
pricing to reflect current market environment.
We, along with our competitors in the deathcare industry, have
historically generated most of our profits from the sale of
traditional products (including caskets, vaults, and markers),
while placing less emphasis on the services involved in funeral
and burial preparation. However, due to increased customer
preference for comprehensive and personalized deathcare
services, as well as increased competition from retail outlets
(including on-line retailers) for the sale of traditional
products, we have realigned our pricing strategy from product to
service offerings in order to
19
focus on services that are most valued by customers. Our initial
results from the realignment strategy have been favorable based
on increases in the overall average revenue per funeral service
performed. We are currently evaluating the pricing of those
locations acquired from Alderwoods and expect to make
adjustments in the future to similarly align the pricing
strategy for these locations as well.
Drive
operating discipline and take advantage of our
scale.
Although we have already made substantial improvements in our
infrastructure, we believe we can continue to achieve operating
improvements through centralization and standardization of
processes for staffing, central care, fleet management and
cemetery maintenance. The acquisition of Alderwoods provides
further opportunities for synergies and operating efficiencies,
which will allow us to utilize our scale and increase
profitability. We are developing clear, yet flexible, operating
standards that will be used as benchmarks for productivity in
these areas. In conjunction with these standards, we will
develop and track shared best practices to support higher
productivity. We also intend to continue to capitalize on our
nationwide network of properties by pursuing strategic affinity
partnerships. Over the longer term, we believe these
relationships can be important to potential customers in their
funeral home selection process.
Manage
and grow the footprint.
We are beginning to manage our network of business locations by
positioning each business location to support the preferences of
its local customer base while monitoring each market for
changing demographics and competitive dynamics. We will
primarily target customers who value quality and prestige or
adhere to specific religious or ethnic customs. In addition, we
expect to pursue selective business expansion through
construction or targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and funeral
homes with a focus on the highest return customer categories. In
particular, we will focus cemetery expansion efforts on large
cemeteries that are or may be combined with funeral home
operations, which would allow facility, personnel, and equipment
costs to be shared between the funeral service location and the
cemetery.
20
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital
Allocation Considerations
Since 1999, we have gained significant financial flexibility by
reducing debt and improving our cash flow. We rely on cash flow
from operations as a significant source of liquidity. Our cash
flow from operating activities provided $324 million in
2006 and we expect our operating cash flow in 2007 to range from
$306 million to $346 million. Our current cash balance is
$63 million as of February 23, 2007. In 2007, we
expect to generate between $150 million and
$170 million in proceeds from divestitures of FTC-mandated
properties and other SCI properties already identified for
disposal. In addition, we have approximately $240 million
in borrowing capacity under our
5-year
revolving credit facility (which is currently supporting
$61.1 million of letters of credit). We have no significant
scheduled debt maturities due in 2007. We believe these sources
of liquidity can be supplemented by our ability to access the
capital markets for additional debt or equity securities.
In order to finance the Alderwoods acquisition, we significantly
increased our indebtedness in the fourth quarter of 2006. In
addition to using $608 million of cash on hand, we issued
$500 million in Senior Notes, $200 million in
privately placed debt securities, and took out a
$150 million term loan for up to three years under our new
credit facility. We prepaid $50 million of our term loan
indebtedness in December 2006 and prepaid an additional
$60 million in January 2007. At December 31, 2006, our
current liabilities exceeded our current assets as a result of
using $608 million of available cash in the Alderwoods
transaction. We believe our future operating cash flows and the
available capacity under our new credit facility described above
will be adequate to meet our working capital needs.
During 2006, and as of February 23, 2007, we had the
following issuances and repayments of our debt:
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Principal(1)
|
|
|
Due Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
7.375%
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
2014
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
7.625%
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
2018
|
Senior Notes Series A
|
|
|
Libor + 2.0%
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2011
|
Senior Notes Series B
|
|
|
Libor + 2.0%
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
2011
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances through
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments normal
retirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
2006
|
Other
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments through
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments early
extinguishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
2009
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment through
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments through
February 23, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will continue to focus on funding growth initiatives that
generate increased profitability, revenue, and cash flows. These
capital investments include the construction of high-end
cemetery property (such as private family estates) and the
construction of funeral home facilities at existing cemeteries.
We will also consider the acquisition of additional deathcare
operations that fit our long-term customer-focused strategy, if
the expected returns will exceed our cost of capital.
21
Since early 2005, we have paid shareholders a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.025 per common share. In November 2006, we
increased our dividend to $0.03 per common share. While we
intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the
foreseeable future, all future dividends are subject to final
determination by our Board of Directors each quarter after its
review of our financial performance.
We currently have approximately $200 million authorized
under our share repurchase program. Once we achieve our internal
capital structure and bank covenant targets, we intend to make
purchases from time to time in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions,
debt covenants and normal trading restrictions. Our credit
agreement and privately-placed debt securities contain covenants
that limit our ability to repurchase our common stock. There can
be no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our
share repurchase program in the future.
Cash
Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is
one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with
substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Highlights of cash flow for the year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
Operating Activities Cash flows from
operating activities was $324.2 million in 2006 compared to
$312.9 million in 2005. The 2005 cash flows from operating
activities increased by $218.7 million as compared to the
operating cash flows in 2004. Included in 2006 are transition
costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition of $3.2 million
and legal payments of $5.7 million. Included in 2005 was a
federal income tax refund of $29.0 million. Included in
2004 was the payment of $131.1 million related to the
resolution of certain litigation matters, a $20.0 million
voluntary cash contribution to our pension plan, and the payment
of $11.4 million to retire life insurance policy loans
related to our SERP and Senior SERP retirement programs.
Excluding the above items, cash flow from operations in 2006
increased approximately $50.0 million compared to 2005.
This increase is primarily due to $21.2 million of rent
payments that were classified in operating cash flows in 2005,
but which are classified as principal payments on capital leases
in cash flows from financing activities in 2006 due to our
revised lease terms. The remaining increase is a result of
$10.9 million in proceeds from the redemption of
convertible preferred equity certificates received in connection
with our disposition of our operations in France, the receipt of
$7.9 million of endowment care proceeds as a result of the
resolution of disputes over ownership rights, and a source of
approximately $10.0 million from working capital. This
working capital source resulted from an increase in preneed and
atneed cash receipts, and increases in cash interest income,
which were partially offset by an increase in bonus and
long-term incentive compensation payments in 2006 related to a
2003 compensation program.
In addition to the items discussed above, the increase in
operating cash flows in 2005 as compared to 2004 is the result
of an extra bi-weekly cash payroll payment of approximately
$19.0 million in 2004, approximately $13.0 million
decrease in bonus payments, an increase in net trust
withdrawals, and a $16.7 million decrease in cash interest
paid. These net sources of cash were partially offset by cash
outflows of $16.0 million associated with our cash funding
of our 401(k) matches in 2005 (compared with funding through the
use of stock in 2004) and a $10.2 million increase in
cash outflows to improve internal controls in order to comply
with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Cash receipts
from Kenyon increased $15.0 million (offset by an
$18.8 million increase in Kenyon expenses) in 2005 compared
to the same period in 2004 due to Kenyons involvement with
the incidents in Asia, Greece and the U.S. gulf coast.
Additionally, cash flows from operating activities provided by
our former operations in France decreased $18.3 million in
2005 as a result of the sale of our French operations in March
2004.
We did not pay federal income taxes in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Because of our net operating loss carryforwards we do not expect
to pay federal income taxes until the second half of 2007.
Foreign, state and local income tax payments increased
$9.0 million to $15.6 million in 2006 as compared to
$6.6 million in 2005 and $10.8 million in 2004
primarily as a result of lower foreign taxes paid due to the
disposition of some of our operations in 2004.
Investing Activities Cash flows from
investing activities declined $1.5 billion in 2006 compared
to 2005 due to $1.3 billion in cash outflows for
acquisitions (primarily Alderwoods) and a $180.0 million
decrease in proceeds from divestitures. The 2005 cash flows from
investing activities of $171.0 million decreased by
22
$118.5 million primarily due to Alderwoods, as compared to
the investing cash flows in 2004. This decline was driven by a
decrease in proceeds from divestitures and a decrease in net
withdrawals from restricted funds primarily related to various
commercial commitments.
In 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $1.2 billion, including
refinancing of $357.7 million of Alderwoods debt. We also
received $11.0 million of proceeds held as an income tax
receivable related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile
and $10.6 million in cash proceeds from the fourth quarter
2006 sale of our operations in Singapore.
In 2005, we received $90.4 million from the disposition of
our cemetery operations in Chile, $42.7 million related to
the collection of the EUR 10 million note receivable
and the redemption of preferred equity certificates related to
our equity investment in our former French operations (of which
$39.7 million is reported as an investing activity), and
$21.6 million from the disposition of our Argentina and
Uruguay businesses.
In 2004, we sold our funeral operations in France and received
net cash proceeds of $281.7 million. Following a successful
public offering transaction of our former United Kingdom
affiliate during the second quarter of 2004, we liquidated our
debt and equity holdings in this affiliate and collected
$53.8 million in aggregate, of which $49.2 million is
reported as an investing activity.
Financing Activities Cash flows from
financing activities generated $565.2 million in 2006
compared to using $326.4 million in 2005. This
$891.6 million net increase in cash was driven by proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt, a reduction in share
repurchases, and a reduction in debt payments. Cash used in
financing activities decreased $9.6 million in 2005
compared to 2004 primarily due to stock repurchases, partially
offset by debt extinguishments and dividend payments.
Proceeds from long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$825.3 million in 2006 due to the issuance of
$250.0 million of senior unsecured 7.625% notes due in
2018, $250.0 million of senior unsecured 7.375% notes
due 2014, $200 million of private placement offerings, and
$150 million term loan. Proceeds from the issuance of debt
were $291.5 million in 2005 due to the issuance of senior
unsecured 7.00% notes due in 2017. In 2004, proceeds of
$241.4 million were due to the issuance of 6.75% notes
due 2016.
Payments of debt in 2006 were $228.9 million due to the
acceptance of the tender of $139.0 million of our
7.70% senior notes due 2009, a $50.0 million repayment
of our new term loan, $26.1 million in scheduled debt
payments, and $21.3 million in payments on capital leases.
The $377.1 million of debt payments in 2005 were related to
early extinguishments of $291.3 million, the
$63.5 million final payment of 6.00% notes due
December 2005 and $14.5 million of other note payments. In
2004, payments of debt were $477.8 million due to the
$300.0 million early extinguishment, the repayment of
$111.2 million of the 7.375% notes due 2004 and
$50.8 million of 8.375% notes due in 2004.
We repurchased 3.4 million shares of common stock for
$27.9 million in 2006, compared to 31.0 million shares
for $225.1 million in 2005 and 16.7 million shares for
$110.3 million in 2004.
We paid $29.4 million of cash dividends during 2006 and
$22.6 million of cash dividends during 2005 related to the
quarterly cash dividend reinstated in 2005 by the Board of
Directors. There were no dividend payments in 2004.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and
Contingent Commitments
We have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in
the ordinary course of conducting our business. We have
contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under
existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities,
interest on long-term debt, and employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements. We also have commercial and
contingent obligations that result in cash payments only if
certain events occur requiring our performance pursuant to a
funding commitment.
23
The following table details our known future cash payments (on
an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 - 2009
|
|
|
2010 - 2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt maturities(1)
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
535.6
|
|
|
|
248.4
|
|
|
|
1,128.7
|
|
|
|
1,958.9
|
|
Interest obligation on long-term
debt
|
|
|
141.1
|
|
|
|
267.1
|
|
|
|
225.5
|
|
|
|
549.7
|
|
|
|
1,183.4
|
|
Operating lease agreements(2)
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
74.9
|
|
Employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements(3)
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
Pension termination(4)
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations
|
|
$
|
252.5
|
|
|
$
|
829.1
|
|
|
$
|
487.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,724.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,292.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our outstanding indebtedness contains standard provisions, such
as payment delinquency default clauses and change of control
clauses. In addition, our bank credit agreement contains a
maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 12 for additional details of our
long-term debt. |
|
(2) |
|
The majority of our lease arrangements contain options to
(i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise
date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at
the inception of the leases, or (iii) renew for the fair
rental value at the end of the primary lease term. Our leases
primarily relate to funeral service locations and cemetery
operating and maintenance equipment. See Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 15 for additional details related to leases. |
|
(3) |
|
We have entered into management employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements which contractually require us to
make cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements
have been primarily entered into with certain officers and
employees and former owners of businesses acquired. Agreements
with contractual periods less than one year are excluded. See
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 15 for additional details related
to these agreements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have committed to a plan to terminate our Cash Balance Plan
and certain other pension plans in 2007. See Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 17 for
additional details related to our pension plans. |
The following table details our known potential or possible
future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to
various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration by Period
|
|
Commercial and Contingent Obligations
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 - 2009
|
|
|
2010 - 2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Surety obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
278.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
278.6
|
|
Letters of credit(2)
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
Representations and warranties(3)
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
Income distributions from trust(4)
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and contingent
obligations
|
|
$
|
363.9
|
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
387.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See the section titled Financial Assurances
following this table in this
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued
by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs
or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the
financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon
the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an
obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for
one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon
maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment
secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to |
24
|
|
|
|
|
reimburse the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the
letter of credit. We believe that it is unlikely we will be
required to fund a claim under our outstanding letters of
credit. As of December 31, 2006, the full amount of the
letters of credit was supported by our credit facility which
expires November 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
In addition to the letters of credit described above, we
currently have contingent obligations of $32.8 million
related to our asset sales and joint venture transactions. We
have agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
associated with such disposition transactions with letters of
credit or interest-bearing cash investments. We have
interest-bearing cash investments of $9.0 million included
in Deferred charges and other assets pledged as
collateral for certain of these contingent obligations. We do
not believe we will ultimately be required to fund to third
parties any claims against these representations and warranties.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized
$35.8 million of contractual obligations related to
representations and warranties associated with the disposition
of our funeral operations in France. The remaining obligations
of $23.8 million at December 31, 2006 are primarily
related to certain foreign taxes and certain litigation matters.
This amount is recorded in Other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet. See Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 15 for
additional information related to this obligation. |
|
(4) |
|
In certain states and provinces, we have withdrawn allowable
distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the
maturity or cancellation of the related contract. In the event
of market declines, we may be required to re-deposit portions or
all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some future
period. |
Financial
Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements
with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to
issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance
and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety
bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the
majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been
used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales
activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred
preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and
cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other
activities, are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral
|
|
$
|
137.0
|
|
|
$
|
139.3
|
|
Preneed cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services
|
|
|
162.0
|
|
|
|
161.8
|
|
Pre-construction
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral
and cemetery obligations
|
|
|
307.6
|
|
|
|
313.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business
permits
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding
|
|
$
|
323.6
|
|
|
$
|
329.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post
surety bonds where allowed by state law. We post the surety
bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received
from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally
determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that
would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with
applicable state law. For the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, we had $50.9 million and $64.0 million,
respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales.
These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes,
obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically
renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts,
unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the
surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety
bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company was to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain
replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund
a trust for an amount generally less than the
25
posted bond amount. Management does not expect we will be
required to fund material future amounts related to these surety
bonds because of lack of surety capacity.
Preneed
Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of
Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client
families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral
or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and
cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until some
time in the future, most states and provinces require that all
or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise and
service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service
is performed. In certain situations, as described above, where
permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety bond as
financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral
or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts. Our backlog of funeral and cemetery contracts shown
below represents the total amount of future revenues we have
under contract at the end of 2006 and 2005.
Trust-Funded Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The funds deposited into trust (in
accordance with various state and provincial laws) are invested
by independent trustees in accordance with the investment
guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor
rule is applicable, the guidelines established by the Investment
Committee of our Board of Directors. We retain any funds above
the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use
them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the
selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are
expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the
preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the
future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
The preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets are consolidated
and recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at market value.
Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in
the trust and distributed as the revenue associated with the
preneed funeral or cemetery contract is recognized or cancelled
by the customer. In certain states and provinces, the trusts are
allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us
prior to that date.
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is cancelled prior to
delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the
refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the
attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive
the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously
undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue
a refund to the customer. We retain excess funds, if any, and
recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any
investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenue in our
consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions,
we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts
deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Based on
our historical experience, we have included a cancellation
reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery contracts in our
consolidated balance sheet of $151.3 million and
$112.0 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed
funeral or cemetery contract from the date of sale to its
recognition or cancellation is captured in the operating cash
flow line items (Increase) decrease in preneed receivables
and trust investments, Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed
revenue, Increase (decrease) in non-controlling interest and
Net income (loss) in the consolidated statement of cash
flows. While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided
by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer
and any distributed investment earnings. Prior to
January 1, 2005, this amount was reduced by the payment of
preneed deferred selling costs. The effect of amortizing preneed
deferred selling costs was reflected in Depreciation and
amortization in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Effective January 1, 2005, the payment of direct selling
costs associated with trust funded preneed contracts is
reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows as cash
flows from operating activities in the line item Net
income (loss), since such direct selling costs are expensed
as incurred. At the time of death maturity, we receive the
principal and undistributed investment earnings from the funeral
trust and any remaining receivable due from the customer. At the
time of delivery or storage of cemetery merchandise and service
items for which we were required to deposit funds to trust, we
receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from
the cemetery trust. There is generally no remaining receivable
due from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed
cemetery merchandise and service items only upon payment of the
26
contract balance in full. This cash flow at the time of service,
delivery or storage is generally less than the associated
revenue recognized, thus reducing cash flow from operating
activities.
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed
funeral and cemetery production and maturities, excluding
insurance contracts, for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Funeral:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust-funded (including
bonded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
121.9
|
|
|
$
|
131.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of
contracts)
|
|
|
27,062
|
|
|
|
35,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
166.9
|
|
|
$
|
160.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
40,813
|
|
|
|
40,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
|
$
|
307.4
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
210.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production
|
|
|
527.8
|
|
|
|
517.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production deferred to
backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
146.9
|
|
|
$
|
151.3
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
164.3
|
|
|
|
156.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production deferred to
backlog
|
|
|
311.2
|
|
|
|
308.2
|
|
Revenue recognized from backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
143.5
|
|
|
$
|
138.6
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
162.3
|
|
|
|
157.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue recognized from
backlog
|
|
|
327.3
|
|
|
|
295.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral
Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial
law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by
purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party
insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general
sales agent for the insurance company. These general agency
commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per contract
sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance
purchase transaction between the customer and third-party
insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred
pursuant to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral
contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of the
insurance contract between the customer and the third-party
insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed
funeral contract. We do not reflect the unfulfilled
insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 60% of our North
America preneed funeral production in 2006 relates to
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts.
The third-party insurance company collects funds related to the
insurance contract directly from the customer. The life
insurance contracts include a death benefit escalation
provision, which is expected to offset the inflationary costs of
providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the
future at the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the
preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy
benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral
contract at the time of need.
27
Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving
certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as
a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with
the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000.
The table below details the North America results of
insurance-funded preneed funeral production and maturities for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the number
of contracts associated with those transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral
insurance-funded(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
192.1
|
|
|
$
|
193.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of
contracts)
|
|
|
36,152
|
|
|
|
42,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General agency revenue
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
192.9
|
|
|
$
|
194.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
42,022
|
|
|
|
41,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. |
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The following table reflects our
North America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery contract revenues including amounts related
to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Additionally, the
table reflects our North America backlog of unfulfilled
insurance-funded contracts (which was not included in our
consolidated balance sheet) at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we
believe will cancel before maturity based on historical
experience.
28
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and
cemetery receivables and trust investments (market and cost
bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated
cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is
meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future
revenues we expect to recognize as a result of preneed sales, as
well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues.
Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future
revenues will exceed the cash distributions actually received
from the associated trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Backlog of trust-funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
1,658.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,633.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,495.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,482.6
|
|
Backlog of insurance-funded
preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
2,982.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,982.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,092.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,092.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral
revenues
|
|
$
|
4,640.1
|
|
|
$
|
4,615.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,587.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,574.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of
trust-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated
allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
1,445.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,420.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,158.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,145.9
|
|
Insurance policies associated with
insurance-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues, net of
estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
2,982.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,982.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,092.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,092.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with
backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
4,427.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,402.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,250.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,238.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery
revenues
|
|
$
|
1,853.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,790.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,644.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,600.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of
deferred cemetery revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation
|
|
$
|
1,357.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,334.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,157.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,119.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2006 and 2005. The difference between the backlog and asset
amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety
bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
into trust, and allowable cash distributions from trust assets.
The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from
insurance companies through the assignment of policy proceeds
related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Results
of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2006,
2005, and 2004
Management
Summary
Our primary financial focus in 2006 was on funding disciplined
growth initiatives that generate increased profitability and
cash flow margins. The most significant of these initiatives was
the acquisition of Alderwoods in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Former Alderwoods businesses contributed $11 million of
income from continuing operations before income tax representing
their operations from November 28, 2006 (the acquisition
date) through December 31, 2006. Other key highlights in
2006 included:
|
|
|
|
|
an improvement in 2006 gross margin percentage to 19.7% from
17.4% in 2005;
|
|
|
|
a 9.0% increase in North America comparable average revenue per
funeral service (7.9% excluding a floral revenue increase)
compared to 2005, which more than offset a 5.8% decline in North
America comparable funeral services performed;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
North America comparable cemetery revenue increased
$32.5 million, or 6.1%, in 2006 compared to 2005; and
|
|
|
|
Cremation rates were 40.9% in 2006 and 2005 reflecting our
strategic pricing initiative and discounting policies, which
have resulted in a decline in highly-discounted, low-service
cremation customers.
|
Results
of Operations
In 2006, we reported consolidated net income of
$56.5 million ($.19 per dilutive share) compared to a
net loss in 2005 of $127.9 million ($(.42) per dilutive
share) and net income in 2004 of $110.7 million
($.34 per dilutive share). These results were impacted by
large non-recurring items that decreased earnings, including:
|
|
|
|
|
after-tax accounting changes of $187.5 million in 2005 and
$50.6 million in 2004;
|
|
|
|
net after-tax losses on asset sales of $50.1 million in
2006 and $31.2 million in 2005;
|
|
|
|
after-tax losses from the early extinguishment of debt of
$10.7 million in 2006, $9.3 million in 2005, and
$10.5 million in 2004;
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our acquisition of Alderwoods of
$4.3 million in 2006;
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our Bridge Financing of
$3.9 million in 2006; and
|
|
|
|
after-tax settlement of significant litigation matters of
$38.7 million in 2004.
|
Significant non-recurring items that increased earnings included:
|
|
|
|
|
state net operating loss tax benefits of $11.9 million and
$7.9 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively;
|
|
|
|
after-tax earnings from discontinued operations of
$3.9 million in 2006, $4.5 million in 2005, and
$43.8 million in 2004; and
|
|
|
|
after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $53.2 million in
2004.
|
30
Consolidated
Versus Comparable Results Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our
comparable, or same store, results for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. We define
comparable operations (or same store operations) as those
funeral and cemetery locations that were owned for the entire
period beginning January 1, 2004 and ending
December 31, 2006. The following tables present operating
results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us
for all three years. As implied by our definition of comparable
operations, these results specifically exclude any impact from
the Alderwoods acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,149.7
|
|
|
$
|
39.5
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,089.5
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
591.1
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
562.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740.8
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
1,652.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,747.3
|
|
|
$
|
55.8
|
|
|
$
|
32.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,658.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
236.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
227.0
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
334.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
344.7
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
334.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,143.6
|
|
|
$
|
65.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,077.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
560.3
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
530.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,703.9
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
1,607.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,711.0
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,614.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
214.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
209.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
294.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
297.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
294.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,120.1
|
|
|
$
|
100.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,019.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
570.1
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
532.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,690.2
|
|
|
|
137.9
|
|
|
|
1,552.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
127.3
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135.5
|
|
|
|
128.6
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,825.7
|
|
|
$
|
266.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,559.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
214.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
206.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
102.1
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
106.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
312.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
328.4
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
312.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
comparable average revenue per funeral service in North America
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. We
calculate average revenue per funeral service by dividing
comparable North America funeral revenue, excluding General
Agency (GA) revenues and revenues from our Kenyon subsidiary in
order to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral
services revenue, by the comparable number of funeral services
performed in North America during the period. The following data
specifically excludes any impact from the Alderwoods acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral
service)
|
|
|
Comparable North America funeral
revenue
|
|
$
|
1,089.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,077.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,019.5
|
|
Less: GA revenues
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Kenyon revenues
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable North America
funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,054.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,027.1
|
|
|
$
|
989.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America funeral
services performed
|
|
|
220,312
|
|
|
|
233,880
|
|
|
|
230,270
|
|
Comparable North America average
revenue per funeral service
|
|
$
|
4,785
|
|
|
$
|
4,391
|
|
|
$
|
4,296
|
|
Funeral
Results
Consolidated
Funeral Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were
$1,156 million in the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to $1,151 million in the same period of 2005. An
increase of $36.5 million, representing the operations of
former Alderwoods businesses since the acquisition date,
combined with higher average revenue per funeral service and an
increase in floral revenues of approximately $10.7 million.
These increases were offset by a decline in funeral services
performed due to a decrease in funeral properties as a result of
our continuing efforts to dispose of non-strategic locations. We
also believe the decline reflects a decrease in the number of
deaths in the markets we serve. Additionally, Kenyons
revenue declined $19.3 million to $4.6 million, as
services related to incidents in Asia, Greece, and
U.S. gulf coast in 2005 were not replaced by similar
services in 2006.
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations declined by
$103.6 million in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily due to
the sale of funeral operations in France, which contributed
$127.3 million in revenues during 2004. The decrease in
revenues related to our former French operations was partially
offset by an increase in North America revenues of
$23.5 million. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in Kenyons revenues of $20.5 million over
the prior year, resulting from disaster management services
provided in Asia, Greece, and the U.S. gulf coast in 2005.
Comparable
Funeral Revenue
North America comparable funeral revenue increased
$11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. However,
Kenyon revenue decreased $19.3 million as described above.
Excluding the decrease in Kenyon, North America comparable
funeral revenue increased $31.0 million, reflecting higher
average revenue per funeral service and an increase in floral
revenue described above. General agency revenue also increased
$3.8 million, or 14.2% in 2006 compared to 2005 as a result
of a favorable mix shift in the types of preneed funeral
insurance contracts sold. These improvements were partially
offset by a decline in volume.
North America comparable funeral revenue in 2005 increased
$58.3 million over 2004. Increases in Kenyon revenue as
described above contributed $20.5 million of the increase.
The remaining increase was primarily a result of an increase in
comparable atneed revenue resulting from an increase in funeral
volume and a higher average revenue per funeral.
33
Funeral
Services Volume
The overall success of our strategic pricing initiative was
partially offset by a 5.8% decrease in comparable funeral volume
in 2006 compared to 2005. We believe this decline reflects a
decrease in the number of deaths within the markets where we
compete, due in part to an unusually warm winter season in the
first quarter of 2006. The decline in deaths was particularly
pronounced in the first quarter of 2006 in the Northeast United
States where we have a high concentration of operations. Also
impacting the decline in volume were certain local business
decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships and
activities. These decisions were made based on our customer
segmentation strategy, which focuses on higher market share
opportunities with certain customer segments. We will continue
to evaluate existing relationships and may ultimately choose to
exit other markets as we maintain focus on our strategy. Our
cremation rate of 40.9% in 2006 was flat compared to 2005. We
have seen the upward trend in our cremation rate flatten despite
the continued increase in the markets where we compete,
reflecting the impact of our decision to exit unprofitable
immediate cremation activities.
Average
Revenue Per Funeral
Our recent focus on strategic pricing, beginning in late 2005,
has resulted in a 9.0% increase in comparable average revenue
per funeral service or $394 per funeral service (7.9% or
$340 per service excluding a floral revenue increase) in
2006 over 2005, and an increase of 1.4% in 2005 compared to
2004. Pursuant to this strategy, we have realigned our pricing
focus away from our products to our service offerings,
reflecting our competitive advantage and concentration on those
service areas where our customers believe we add the most value.
This has resulted in a loss in volume from highly discounted,
low-service cremation customers. These initiatives, although
reducing our funeral services volume, have generated significant
improvements in average revenue per funeral service.
Funeral
Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profit increased $21.3 million
in 2006, primarily due to decreases in costs and
$9.9 million contributed from former Alderwoods operations.
Significant cost decreases included a $10.7 million decline
in salary and fringe expense due to more centralization and
standardization in our organization as well as a decrease in
selling costs resulting from lower case volume. These gross
profit improvements were partially offset by a $4.6 million
decline in Kenyons gross profits, which resulted from
fixed costs incurred over a lower revenue base.
Consolidated funeral gross profits decreased $11.1 million
in 2005 as compared to 2004 reflecting the disposition of our
French operations in March 2004.
Comparable
Funeral Gross Profit
Comparable North America funeral gross profit increased
$17.2 million or 8.2% in 2006 versus 2005. The comparable
funeral gross margin percentage increased to 20.8% in 2006
compared to 19.5% in 2005. The comparable revenue increases
described above and continued cost improvements to our
infrastructure, including a decrease in salary and fringe
expense totaling $5.8 million, were partially offset by the
$4.6 million decrease in gross profit from Kenyons
operations.
Our comparable North America funeral gross profit improved
$5.2 million (2.5%) in 2005 versus 2004; however, the
comparable funeral gross margin percentage decreased to 19.5%
compared to 20.1% in 2004. Despite the improved comparable
revenues discussed above, margin percentages declined because of
increased costs, which included a $4.7 million effect from
our change in accounting for deferred selling costs as well as
inflationary increases in merchandise costs, increases in group
health and pension costs, and increased costs related to our
trust reconciliation projects and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
activities.
Cemetery
Results
Cemetery
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased
$30.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005, reflecting higher
atneed revenues and increased delivery of preneed merchandise
combined with a $14.4 million
34
increase from operations acquired from Alderwoods. Also
contributing to the increase was the receipt and recognition of
$7.9 million in endowment care income in 2006.
Consolidated cemetery revenues decreased $11.0 million in
2005 versus 2004 due to a $9.8 million decline in North
America operations. Approximately $11.3 million of the
decrease was due to a decrease in the number of SCIs North
American properties as a result of our continued effort to
dispose of non-strategic locations.
Comparable
Cemetery Revenue
North America comparable cemetery revenue increased
$32.5 million or 6.1% in 2006 compared to 2005. The
increase primarily resulted from a $10 million increase in
cemetery atneed revenues as well as an increase in trust fund
income, partially offset by lower interest income on preneed
receivables.
North America comparable cemetery revenue decreased
$2.7 million or .5% in 2005 compared to 2004. This decrease
primarily resulted from declines associated with constructed
cemetery property and interest on trade receivables. Decreases
in interest on trade receivables resulted from an increase in
the number of contracts that were not financed, increased down
payments, and shorter financing terms.
Cemetery
Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $26.4 million
or 3.7% in 2006 compared to 2005. Cemetery gross margin
percentages increased from 14.6% in 2005 to 18.3% in 2006,
reflecting $1.7 million from operations acquired from
Alderwoods, the endowment care income received and recognized in
2006 related to the resolution of a dispute over the funds, and
an increase in other trust fund income.
Consolidated cemetery gross profits decreased $20.2 million
in 2005 as compared to 2004. These declines were due to the
decrease in revenue discussed above, coupled with a
$9.5 million negative impact from our change in accounting
related to deferred selling costs.
Comparable
Cemetery Gross Profit
North America comparable cemetery gross profits increased
$22.9 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The comparable
cemetery percentage increased to 19.1% in 2006 from 15.9% in
2005. These improvements were a result of the increases in
atneed cemetery revenues and in endowment care trust fund income
discussed above and cost improvements. Selling and salary
expenses decreased in 2006 due to increased centralization
within our organization. The decrease in these expenses was
partially offset by higher maintenance and utilities costs
primarily resulting from increased fuel costs.
North America comparable cemetery gross profits decreased
$21.9 million in 2005 compared to 2004 due to the decrease
in revenue and the change in accounting for deferred selling
costs described above. The comparable cemetery gross margin
percentage decreased to 15.9% in 2005 from 19.9% in 2004.
Other
Financial Statement Items
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $94.9 million in
2006 compared to $84.8 million in 2005 and
$130.9 million in 2004. For 2006 compared to 2005, general
and administrative costs increased $10.1 million primarily
due to $7.0 million in expenses related to our acquisition
of Alderwoods and $3.9 million of share-based compensation
costs related to stock options expensed under FAS 123(R).
These costs were partially offset by a decrease in salary
expense. Included in 2004 expenses were non-recurring litigation
expenses (net of insurance recoveries of $1.6 million) of
$61.1 million.
Gains
(Losses) on Dispositions and Impairment Charges, Net
In 2006, we recognized a $58.7 million net pretax
impairment loss. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America, including a $16.6 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP and a $26.4 million
impairment of certain assets in Michigan for
35
which we have commenced a plan to sell and which are classified
as assets held for sale at December 31, 2006. Additionally,
in connection with the Alderwoods acquisition, we have entered
into a consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission to
divest certain of our non-Alderwoods properties, and we have
recorded an impairment charge of $12.9 million for these
properties which were owned by us and are classified as assets
held for sale at December 31, 2006.
In 2005, we recognized a $26.1 million net pretax loss from
impairments. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America (including a $30.0 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP). The net loss was partially
offset by the release of approximately $15.6 million in
indemnification liabilities previously recorded in connection
with the 2004 sales of our United Kingdom and French operations.
In 2004, we recognized a $25.8 million net pretax gain from
our disposition activities, including a $41.2 million gain
from the sale of our equity and debt holdings in our former
United Kingdom operations and a $6.4 million gain from the
disposition of our French funeral operations. These gains were
partially offset by net losses associated with various
dispositions in North America. For further information regarding
gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net see
Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased to $123.4 million in 2006,
compared to $103.7 million in 2005 and $119.3 million
in 2004. The increase of $19.7 million in interest expense
between 2006 and 2005 resulted primarily from $6.4 million
in bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition
and an incremental $10.5 million of interest costs related
to our increased borrowings to finance the Alderwoods
acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Interest expense in 2005 was $36.3 million less than 2004
as a result of less outstanding debt in 2005.
Interest
Income
Interest income of $31.2 million in 2006, a
$14.5 million increase over 2005, reflects the increase in
our cash balance for most of 2006 coupled with an increase in
interest rates.
Interest income of $16.7 million in 2005, compared to
$13.5 million in 2004, reflects the increase in our cash
balance invested in commercial paper, which contributed
$7.2 million. This increase was partially offset by
$4.5 million of reduced interest income related to a note
receivable from our former investment in a United Kingdom
company, which was collected in full in 2004.
Loss on
Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2006, we repurchased $139.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.7% notes due 2009 in a tender
offer in the fourth quarter and prepaid $50.0 million of
our term loan in December 2006. As a result of these
transactions, we recognized a loss of $17.5 million, which
is composed of the redemption premiums paid of $8.2 million
and the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$9.3 million.
During 2005, we repurchased $16.6 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.70% notes due 2009 in the open
market, and $0.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. Also during 2005,
we redeemed $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of
our 6.875% notes due 2007 and $139.3 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.20% notes due 2006, pursuant to a
tender offer for such notes. As a result of these transactions,
we recognized a loss of $14.3 million, which is comprised
of the redemption premiums paid of $12.2 million and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of
$2.1 million.
In 2004, we extinguished $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our 6.00% notes due 2005, pursuant to the Offer
to Purchase dated March 24, 2004. We also purchased
$8.7 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. The holders of
$221.6 million of our 6.75% convertible subordinated notes
due 2008 converted their holdings to equity in June 2004,
pursuant to the terms of the notes. Simultaneously,
36
we exercised our option by redeeming the remaining outstanding
$91.1 million of the notes. As a result of these
transactions, we recognized a loss on the early extinguishment
of debt of $16.8 million.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net was $16.1 million in 2006, compared to
$2.3 million in 2005 and $8.7 million in 2004. Key
components of other income for the years presented are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income of $10.9 million was received and
recognized in 2006 from the redemption of a portion of our
ownership interest in our operations in France.
|
|
|
|
Equity income of $1.1 million was recognized in 2006 from
our French equity investment.
|
|
|
|
Cash overrides received from a third party insurance provider
related to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral
contracts were $5.6 million in 2006, compared to
$6.0 million in 2005 and $6.3 million in 2004.
|
|
|
|
Surety bond premium costs were $4.0 million in 2006,
compared to $3.6 million in 2005 and $4.0 million in
2004.
|
(Provision)
Benefit for Income Taxes
The consolidated effective tax rate in 2006 resulted in a
provision of 46.0%, compared to a provision of 36.8% in 2005 and
a benefit of 6.8% in 2004. The 2006 and 2005 tax rates were
negatively impacted by permanent differences between the book
and tax bases of North American asset dispositions and the 2005
tax rate was partially offset by state net operating loss
benefits. The 2004 tax rate was favorably impacted by tax
benefits resulting from the disposition of our operations in
France and the United Kingdom and from state net operating
losses realized in 2004. The tax benefits from dispositions
result from differences between book and tax bases and from the
reversal of tax liabilities that were then recorded as warranty
indemnification liabilities.
Weighted
Average Shares
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was
297.4 million in 2006, compared to 306.7 million in
2005 and 344.7 million in 2004. The decrease in all years
was mainly due to our share repurchase program, which began in
the third quarter of 2004. Additionally, the decrease from 2004
to 2005 was related to the contribution of cash to our 401(k)
retirement plan. Effective January 1, 2005, we began
contributing cash to fund the Companys matching
contribution to our 401(k) retirement plan and discontinued
funding through the use of common stock.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements and
Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the
accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made
by management during their preparation. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could
differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with
the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting
measurements. The following is a discussion of our critical
accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition, business
combinations, the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets,
and the use of estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are
performed. Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts
due for funeral services already performed. Revenue associated
with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the
service is performed or merchandise is delivered. Revenue
associated with cemetery property interment rights is recognized
in accordance with the retail land sales provision of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a
minimum percentage (10%) of the sales price has been collected.
Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery
property is deferred until it is constructed and 10% of the
sales price is collected.
37
When a customer enters into a preneed funeral trust contract,
the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is
recognized at the time of maturity. The revenues associated with
a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as
different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery
interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when
a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the
property has been constructed or is available for interment. For
personalized marker merchandise, with the customers
direction generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose
to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. Upon the
earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our
cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues and record the
cost of sale. For services and non-personalized merchandise
(such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are
performed and the merchandise is delivered.
Business
Combinations
We apply the principles provided in SFAS 141 when we
acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of the
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition. These changes are
disclosed in future reports as they occur.
On November 28, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a
purchase price of $1.2 billion, which includes the
refinancing of $357.7 million and the assumption of
$2.2 million of Alderwoods debt resulting in goodwill
of $183.0 million. Alderwoods properties have been
substantially integrated into our operations at
December 31, 2006. These properties are operated in the
same manner as our incumbent properties, under our leadership,
and are reported in the appropriate reporting unit (segment)
whether funeral or cemetery in our consolidated financial
statements. See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 5 for details related to this
acquisition.
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
We test for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach as
prescribed in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The first
step of our goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill.
Reporting units for SCI are the funeral and cemetery segments.
We do not record an impairment of goodwill in instances where
the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount.
If fair value is less than the carrying amount for a reporting
unit, we would perform the second step which is to compare the
implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting
unit is determined using a calculation based on multiples of
revenue and multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, and amortization, of both SCI and its
competitors. Based on our impairment tests performed during the
fourth quarter using September 30th information, there was
no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
We review our other non-goodwill long-lived assets for
impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and
assets not expected to provide any future service potential are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less estimated cost to sell.
In October 2006, we sold our remaining funeral businesses in
Singapore for proceeds of approximately $11.6 million of
which $1.0 million is due in the second quarter of 2007.
Other divestitures in 2006 and assets held for sale at
December 31, 2006 resulted in $58.7 million in net
losses on dispositions and impairment charges.
In November 2005, we sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP. In the third quarter of 2005, we committed
to a plan to sell these locations and classified these
properties as held for sale. Pursuant to
38
our impairment policy under SFAS 144, we recorded an
impairment charge of $25.3 million in our cemetery segment
and $4.7 million in our funeral segment.
During the second quarter of 2004, we committed to a plan to
divest our funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and
Uruguay. Upon this triggering event, we tested these operations
for impairment. As a result of this impairment test, we recorded
an impairment charge of $15.2 million in our 2004
consolidated financial statements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results
could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated
with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical
accounting measurements. Key estimates used by management, among
others, include:
Allowances We provide various allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
at need receivables, as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. We also record
an estimate of general agency revenues that may be cancelled in
their first year, where the revenue would be charged back by the
insurance company. These estimates are impacted by a number of
factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and
demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation.
Valuation of trust investments With the
implementation of revised FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), as of
March 31, 2004, we removed the receivables due from trust
assets recorded at cost from our balance sheet and added the
actual trust investments recorded at market value. The trust
investments include marketable securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. Where quoted market prices
are not available, we obtain estimates of fair value from the
managers of the private equity funds, which are based on the
market value of the underlying real estate and private equity
investments. These market values are based on contract offers
for the real estate or the managers appraisals of the
venture capital funds.
Legal liability reserves Contingent
liabilities, principally for legal liability matters, are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments
regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on
historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel.
However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and excessive
verdicts do occur. As disclosed in Note 15 of the
consolidated financial statements, our legal exposures and the
ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings could be material to
operating results or cash flows in any given quarter or year.
Depreciation of long-lived assets We
depreciate our long-lived assets ratably over their estimated
useful lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by
such factors as changing market conditions or changes in
regulatory requirements.
Valuation of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed We apply the principles of SFAS 141
when we acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition.
39
Income taxes Our ability to realize the
benefit of certain of our federal and state deferred tax assets
requires us to achieve certain future earnings levels. We have
established a valuation allowance against a portion of our
deferred tax assets and could be required to further adjust that
valuation allowance if market conditions change materially and
future earnings are, or are projected to be, significantly
different from our current estimates. We intend to permanently
reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain of our foreign
subsidiaries in those businesses outside the United States and,
therefore, have not provided for deferred federal income taxes
on such unremitted foreign earnings.
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies
depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the
Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our tax returns
for 1999 through 2004 and various state jurisdictions are
auditing years through 2005. While it is often difficult to
predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any
particular tax matter, we believe that our accruals reflect the
probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable
settlement of any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax
asset or require the use of cash. Favorable resolution could
result in reduced income tax expense reported in the financial
statements in the future. Our tax accruals are presented in the
balance sheet within Deferred income taxes and Other
liabilities.
Pension cost Our pension plans are frozen
with no benefits accruing to participants except interest.
Pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based
on certain assumptions, including the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations. On January 1, 2004, we
changed our method of accounting for gains and losses on pension
assets and obligations to recognize such gains and losses in our
consolidated statement of operations during the year in which
they occur. Therefore, the concept of an expected rate of return
on plan assets is not applicable.
Discount rates used to determine pension obligations for our
pension plans in 2006 were 5.75% for the SCI SERP, Senior SERP
and Directors Plans and 5.5% for all other plans. Discount rates
for all plans were 5.75% and 6.00% for the years ended 2005, and
2004, respectively. We determine the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations using an analysis of expected
future benefit payments. We verify the reasonableness of the
discount rate by comparing our rate to the rate earned on
high-quality fixed income investments, such as the Moodys
Aa index. At December 31, 2006, 63% of our plan assets were
held as cash and cash equivalents and the remaining 37% of plan
assets were invested in equity securities. As of
December 31, 2006, the equity securities were invested
approximately 56% in U.S. Large Cap
investments, 22% in international equities and 22% in
U.S. Small Cap investments. Our current
investment objective is to liquidate our plan assets as we have
begun the process to terminate these Plans and expect to
complete this termination by mid-2007.
A sensitivity analysis of the net periodic benefit cost was
modeled to assess the impact that changing discount rates could
have on pre-tax earnings. The sensitivity analysis assumes a
0.25% adverse change to the discount rate with all other
variables held constant. Using this model, our pre-tax earnings
would have decreased by less than $2.0 million, or less
than $.01 per diluted share, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. See Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for more information related to our pension plans.
Insurance loss reserves We purchase
comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery
professional liability, automobile liability, and workers
compensation insurance coverages structured with high
deductibles. This high deductible insurance program means we are
primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance industry
experience indicates a high degree of inherent variability in
assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with casualty
insurance claims. This is especially true with respect to
liability and workers compensation exposures due to the
extended period of time that transpires between when the claim
might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many
years. We continually evaluate loss estimates associated with
claims and losses related to these insurance coverages and
falling within the deductible of each coverage through the use
of qualified and independent actuaries. Assumptions based on
factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development
trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary
trends and data reasonableness will generally effect
40
the analysis and determination of the best estimate
of the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these
actuarial evaluations are used to both analyze and adjust our
insurance loss reserves.
As of December 31, 2006, reported losses within our
retention for workers compensation, general liability and
auto liability incurred during the period May 1, 1987
through December 31, 2006 were approximately
$254.1 million over the 19.5 years. The selected fully
developed ultimate settlement value estimated by our independent
actuary was $304.1 million for the same period. Paid losses
were $236.4 million indicating a reserve requirement of
$67.7 million. After considering matters discussed with our
independent actuary related to this calculation, we estimated
the reserve to be $67.7 million as of December 31,
2006.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the balances in the reserve
for workers compensation, general, and auto liability and
the related activity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
47.3
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
49.0
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(31.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and
accounting changes, see Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Notes 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
We have historically used derivatives primarily in the form of
interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps, and
forward exchange contracts in combination with local currency
borrowings in order to manage our mix of fixed and floating rate
debt and to hedge our net investment in foreign assets. We do
not participate in derivative transactions that are leveraged or
considered speculative in nature. None of our market risk
sensitive instruments are entered into for trading purposes. All
of the instruments described below were entered into for other
than trading purposes.
We did not enter into any derivatives during 2006 and do not
have any derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2006.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, 82% and 99%, respectively,
of our total debt consisted of fixed rate debt at a weighted
average rate of 7.30% and 7.11%, respectively.
At December 31, 2006, approximately 11% of our
stockholders equity and 7% of our operating income were
denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian
dollar. Approximately 4% of our stockholders equity and 8%
of our operating income were denominated in foreign currencies,
primarily the Canadian dollar, at December 31, 2005. We do
not have a significant investment in foreign operations that are
in highly inflationary economies.
Marketable
Equity and Debt Securities Price Risk
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed
cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt
securities and mutual funds, which are
41
sensitive to current market prices. Cost and market values as of
December 31, 2006 are presented in Notes 6, 7,
and 8 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
Market-Rate
Sensitive Instruments Interest Rate and Currency
Risk
We perform a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of
interest rate and exchange rate risks on earnings. This analysis
determines the effect of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in
market rates. In actuality, market rate volatility is dependent
on many factors that are impossible to forecast. Therefore, the
adverse changes described below could differ substantially from
the hypothetical 10% change.
We are currently not subject to significant interest rate risk
on our outstanding debt as 82% of such debt has fixed rate
interest terms. The fair market value of our debt was
approximately $43.8 million more than its carrying value at
December 31, 2006. A fifty basis point increase in our
floating rate risk would increase interest expense by
$2 million.
A similar model was used to assess the impact of changes in
exchange rates for foreign currencies on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, our foreign currency exposure was primarily associated
with the Canadian dollar, the Chilean pesos and the euro. A 10%
adverse change in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative
to the foreign currency instruments would have negatively
affected our income from our continuing operations on an annual
basis, by less than $0.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and less than $0.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
42
Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
All other schedules have been omitted because the required
information is not applicable or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the related notes thereto.
43
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Service Corporation International:
We have completed integrated audits of Service Corporation
Internationals consolidated financial statements and of
its internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our
opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly in all material respects,
the financial position of Service Corporation International and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
share-based compensation effective January 1, 2006. As
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
deferred selling costs related to preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts effective January 1, 2005, and its method of
accounting for variable interest entities effective
March 31, 2004.
Internal
control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
44
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Managements Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A,
management has excluded Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) from
its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006 because it was acquired by the Company
in a purchase business combination during the fourth quarter of
2006. We have also excluded Alderwoods from our audit of
internal control over financial reporting. The total assets and
total revenues of Alderwoods represent approximately 13% and 3%,
respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
February 28, 2007
45
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,402,627
|
)
|
|
|
(1,413,965
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
344,668
|
|
|
|
297,012
|
|
|
|
328,347
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(94,900
|
)
|
|
|
(84,834
|
)
|
|
|
(130,884
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
|
|
25,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
191,085
|
|
|
|
186,085
|
|
|
|
223,260
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
|
|
(103,733
|
)
|
|
|
(119,293
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
|
|
13,453
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of
debt
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
|
|
(14,258
|
)
|
|
|
(16,770
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
97,449
|
|
|
|
87,127
|
|
|
|
109,318
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income
taxes
|
|
|
(44,845
|
)
|
|
|
(32,036
|
)
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
52,604
|
|
|
|
55,091
|
|
|
|
117,421
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations (net of income tax benefit (provision) of $2,548,
$(5,961) and $48,722, respectively)
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
43,833
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes (net of income tax benefit of $117,428 and $22,907,
respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,538
|
)
|
|
|
(50,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
110,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.14
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.62
|
)
|
|
|
(.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of
shares
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
|
|
302,213
|
|
|
|
318,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.13
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.61
|
)
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
shares
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
306,745
|
|
|
|
344,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.105
|
|
|
$
|
.10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
46
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
$
|
446,782
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
107,194
|
|
|
|
97,747
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
39,535
|
|
|
|
31,254
|
|
Current assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
43,162
|
|
|
|
37,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
238,337
|
|
|
|
613,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
|
1,226,192
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
|
1,288,515
|
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,495,248
|
|
|
|
1,392,727
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,641,353
|
|
|
|
950,174
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
371,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
349,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,264,272
|
|
|
|
1,123,888
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
436,545
|
|
|
|
249,581
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust
investments
|
|
|
893,931
|
|
|
|
700,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,729,389
|
|
|
$
|
7,544,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES &
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
$
|
341,173
|
|
|
$
|
231,693
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
46,176
|
|
|
|
20,716
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
17,828
|
|
|
|
20,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
407,947
|
|
|
|
272,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,912,696
|
|
|
|
1,186,485
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
537,792
|
|
|
|
535,384
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
754,193
|
|
|
|
792,485
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
177,341
|
|
|
|
138,677
|
|
Non-current liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
311,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities held for
sale
|
|
|
239,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
357,418
|
|
|
|
326,985
|
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
2,548,743
|
|
|
|
2,015,811
|
|
Non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
887,186
|
|
|
|
694,619
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par
value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 293,222,114 and
294,808,872 issued and outstanding (net of 10,000 and 48,962,063
treasury shares at par, respectively)
|
|
|
293,222
|
|
|
|
294,809
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
2,135,649
|
|
|
|
2,182,745
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(906,394
|
)
|
|
|
(962,905
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
72,298
|
|
|
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,594,775
|
|
|
|
1,581,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,729,389
|
|
|
$
|
7,544,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
47
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
110,661
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,907
|
)
|
|
|
(4,506
|
)
|
|
|
(43,833
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishments of
debt
|
|
|
17,532
|
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
|
16,770
|
|
Premiums paid on early
extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(15,725
|
)
|
|
|
(12,186
|
)
|
|
|
(13,817
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,538
|
|
|
|
50,593
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
|
|
133,431
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
|
|
30,183
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38,257
|
|
|
|
24,854
|
|
|
|
18,283
|
|
Losses (gains) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
58,683
|
|
|
|
26,093
|
|
|
|
(25,797
|
)
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
16,328
|
|
|
|
10,788
|
|
|
|
10,047
|
|
Payments on restructuring charges
|
|
|
(7,646
|
)
|
|
|
(10,723
|
)
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
Litigation payments
|
|
|
(5,570
|
)
|
|
|
(3,126
|
)
|
|
|
(164,566
|
)
|
Change in assets and liabilities,
net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
|
|
37,506
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(7,938
|
)
|
|
|
16,043
|
|
|
|
(23,391
|
)
|
Increase in litigation accrual
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
60,800
|
|
(Decrease) increase in payables and
other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,547
|
)
|
|
|
15,245
|
|
|
|
(45,568
|
)
|
Net effect of preneed funeral
production and deliveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed funeral
receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
33,064
|
|
|
|
29,717
|
|
|
|
44,433
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred
preneed funeral revenue
|
|
|
5,533
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
(14,006
|
)
|
Decrease in deferred selling cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,445
|
)
|
Decrease in funeral non-controlling
interest
|
|
|
(29,968
|
)
|
|
|
(24,651
|
)
|
|
|
(36,971
|
)
|
Net effect of preneed cemetery
production and maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in preneed
cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
34,018
|
|
|
|
49,601
|
|
|
|
(4,339
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred
preneed cemetery revenue
|
|
|
(28,916
|
)
|
|
|
24,583
|
|
|
|
(24,459
|
)
|
Decrease in deferred selling cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,567
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in cemetery
non-controlling interest
|
|
|
21,626
|
|
|
|
(21,203
|
)
|
|
|
55,674
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(8,936
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
322,188
|
|
|
|
318,303
|
|
|
|
88,008
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) by
operating activities from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(5,451
|
)
|
|
|
6,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
324,219
|
|
|
|
312,852
|
|
|
|
94,156
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(99,527
|
)
|
|
|
(98,605
|
)
|
|
|
(95,619
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,301,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from divestitures and
sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
83,146
|
|
|
|
111,500
|
|
|
|
57,511
|
|
Proceeds from dispositions of
foreign operations, net of cash retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,692
|
|
|
|
330,829
|
|
Indemnity payments related to the
sale of former funeral operations in France
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
(2,401
|
)
|
Payment of contingent obligations
to former owners of acquired business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,749
|
)
|
Net withdrawals of restricted funds
and other
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
51,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided in
investing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,307,101
|
)
|
|
|
171,816
|
|
|
|
292,949
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities from discontinued operations
|
|
|
9,599
|
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
(3,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(1,297,502
|
)
|
|
|
171,015
|
|
|
|
289,524
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(26,053
|
)
|
|
|
(85,692
|
)
|
|
|
(177,693
|
)
|
Principal payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(21,346
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt issued
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
297,041
|
|
|
|
241,802
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(24,716
|
)
|
|
|
(5,538
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
Early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(181,543
|
)
|
|
|
(291,277
|
)
|
|
|
(299,961
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
10,605
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
|
|
(225,152
|
)
|
|
|
(110,258
|
)
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(29,431
|
)
|
|
|
(22,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts and other
|
|
|
20,480
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
565,467
|
|
|
|
(326,385
|
)
|
|
|
(335,986
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
565,213
|
|
|
|
(326,385
|
)
|
|
|
(335,986
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(406,902
|
)
|
|
|
158,997
|
|
|
|
48,354
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
446,782
|
|
|
|
287,785
|
|
|
|
239,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
$
|
446,782
|
|
|
$
|
287,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
48
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock, Par
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
302,040
|
|
|
|
$
|
304,509
|
|
|
$
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,274,664
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(945,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,516,330
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,661
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,242
|
)
|
|
|
(9,242
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,636
|
|
|
|
36,636
|
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustments realized in net income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,006
|
|
|
|
49,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,061
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,162
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
Contributions to employee 401(k)
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
15,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,127
|
|
Debenture conversions
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,154
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(16,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,725
|
)
|
|
|
(93,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
323,225
|
|
|
|
|
341,727
|
|
|
|
(18,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,395,057
|
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
(834,964
|
)
|
|
|
(38,349
|
)
|
|
|
1,842,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustments realized in net income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,848
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,093
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock
($.10 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
3,161
|
|
|
|
(3,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(30,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,956
|
)
|
|
|
(194,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
294,809
|
|
|
|
$
|
343,771
|
|
|
$
|
(48,962
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,182,745
|
|
|
$
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(962,905
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,581,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock, Par
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustments realized in net income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,933
|
|
Adjustment for initial adoption of
FAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock
($.105 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
Reclassification of unearned
compensation for restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,942
|
)
|
|
|
51,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of
forfeitures and other
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Employee share-based compensation
earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
(24,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
293,222
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,232
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,135,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(906,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,594,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
50
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We are a provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral service locations and cemeteries primarily
operating in the United States and Canada. We also own a
minority interest in funeral operations of an entity in France.
Additionally, we own Kenyon International Emergency Services
(Kenyon), a subsidiary that specializes in providing disaster
management services in mass fatality incidents as well as
training, planning, and Crisis Communications Consulting
Services. Kenyons results are included in our funeral
operations segment. As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we
acquired an insurance business for which we have commended a
plan to divest The operations of this business are presented as
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
operations and as assets and liabilities of discontinued
operations on our consolidated balance sheet..
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services
relating to funerals and cremations, including the use of
funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and
embalming services. Funeral related merchandise, including
caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral
service locations. Cemeteries provide cemetery property
interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn
crypts, and sell cemetery related merchandise and services,
including stone and bronze memorials, markers, casket and
cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations,
and burial openings and closings. We also sell preneed funeral
and cemetery products and services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and
services to be provided in the future.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Service Corporation International (SCI) and all majority-owned
subsidiaries. These statements also include the accounts of the
funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and services trusts, and
perpetual care trusts in which the Company has a variable
interest and is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Business
Combinations
We apply the principles provided in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) 141 when we acquire businesses.
Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
are recorded at fair value and goodwill is recognized for any
difference between the price of the acquisition and our fair
value determination. We customarily estimate our purchase costs
and other related transactions known at closing of the
acquisition. To the extent that information not available to us
at the closing date subsequently becomes available during the
allocation period, as defined in SFAS 141, we may adjust
goodwill, assets, or liabilities associated with the acquisition.
On November 28, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for $20.00 per share in
cash, resulting in a purchase price of $1.2 billion, which
includes the refinancing of $357.7 million and the
assumption of $2.2 million of Alderwoods debt.
Alderwoods properties have been substantially integrated into
our operations at December 31, 2006. These properties are
operated in the same manner as our incumbent properties, under
our leadership, and are reported in the appropriate reporting
unit (segment) whether funeral or cemetery in our consolidated
financial statements. For further information related to this
acquisition, see Note 5.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to
conform to current period presentation with no effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
51
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. As a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
December 31, 2006, the majority of the Companys cash
was invested in commercial paper.
Accounts
Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts due for
funeral services already performed. We provide various
allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
atneed receivables as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. Atneed funeral
and cemetery receivables are considered past due after
30 days. Collections are managed by the locations until a
receivable is 180 days delinquent at which time it is
written off and sent to a collection agency. These estimates are
impacted by a number of factors, including changes in economy,
relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in our areas
of operation.
Inventories
and Cemetery Property
Funeral and cemetery merchandise are stated at the lower of
average cost or market. Cemetery property is recorded at cost.
Inventory costs and cemetery property are primarily relieved
using specific identification in performance of a contract.
Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major
replacements that extend the assets useful lives are
capitalized. Depreciation is recognized ratably over the
estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets.
Property is depreciated over a period ranging from seven to
forty years, equipment is depreciated over a period from three
to eight years and leasehold improvements are depreciated over
the shorter of the lease term or ten years. Depreciation expense
related to property and equipment was $84.0 million,
$60.7 million and $60.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Depreciation expense in 2006 includes $19.1 million expense
related to capital leases on certain transportation assets that
were classified as operating leases in prior years. See
Note 15 of these consolidated financial statements. When
property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet;
resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated
statement of operations in the period of sale or disposal.
Leases
We have lease arrangements primarily related to funeral service
locations and transportation equipment which were primarily
classified as capital leases at December 31, 2006. Lease
terms related to funeral home properties generally range from
one to 35 years with options to renew at varying terms.
Lease terms related to transportation equipment generally range
from one to five years with options to renew at varying terms.
We calculate operating lease expense ratably over the lease
term. We consider reasonably assured renewal options and fixed
escalation
52
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
provisions in our calculation. For more information related to
leases, see Note 15 to these consolidated financial
statements.
Goodwill
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for as
purchases is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually
for impairment or as otherwise required by assessing the fair
value of each of our reporting units. As of December 31,
2006, our funeral segment reporting unit includes assets in
North America and Germany. Our cemetery segment reporting unit
includes assets in North America. The acquisition of Alderwoods
resulted in an increase in goodwill to both our funeral and
cemetery segments.
We test for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142) annually during the fourth quarter
using information as of September 30.
We test for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach as
prescribed in SFAS 142. The first step of our goodwill
impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to
its carrying amount, including goodwill. Our reporting units are
the funeral and cemetery segments. We do not record an
impairment of goodwill in instances where the fair value of a
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. If fair value is
less than the carrying amount for a reporting unit, we compare
the implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting
unit is determined using a calculation based on multiples of
revenue and multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, of both SCI and its
competitors. Based on the impairment tests performed during the
fourth quarter using September 30 information, we concluded
that there was no impairment of goodwill at December 31,
2006 or 2005. See Note 10 of these consolidated financial
statements.
Other
Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include cemetery customer relationships,
trademarks and tradenames, and other assets primarily resulting
from the acquisition of Alderwoods. Our trademark, tradename,
and water rights assets are considered to have an indefinite
life and are not subject to amortization; rather, such assets
are tested annually, and as otherwise needed, for impairment.
Our preneed deferred revenue intangible asset is relieved using
specific identification in performance of a contract. We
amortize all other intangible assets on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives of
10-20 years.
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
We review our other definite-lived long-lived assets for
impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and
assets not expected to provide any future service potential are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less estimated cost to sell.
Treasury
Stock
We make treasury stock purchases in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions
and normal trading restrictions. We account for the repurchase
of our common stock under the par value method. We use the
average cost method upon the subsequent reissuance of treasury
shares. On
53
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
November 8, 2006, we cancelled 51.9 million shares of
common stock held in our treasury. These retired treasury shares
were changed to authorized but unissued status.
Foreign
Currency Translation
All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as
of the end of the reporting period. Revenue and expense items
are translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting
period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in
stockholders equity as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of
stockholders equity and balance sheet.
The functional currency of SCI and its subsidiaries is the
respective local currency. The transactional currency gains and
losses that arise from transactions denominated in currencies
other than the functional currencies of our operations are
recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated
statement of operations. We do not operate in countries which
are considered to have hyperinflationary economies.
Funeral
Operations
Revenue is recognized when the funeral services are performed
and funeral merchandise is delivered. Our funeral trade
receivables consist of amounts due for services already
performed and merchandise delivered. An allowance for doubtful
accounts is provided based on historical experience. We sell
price guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various
programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. Revenues associated
with sales of preneed funeral contracts are deferred until such
time that the funeral services are performed. Allowances for
customer cancellations are based upon historical experience.
Sales taxes collected are recognized on a net basis.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from funeral merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and services
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed. Costs related to sales of merchandise and
services are charged to expense when merchandise is delivered
and services performed. See Note 6 to the consolidated
financial statements regarding preneed funeral activities.
Cemetery
Operations
Revenue associated with sales of cemetery merchandise and
services is recognized when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Our cemetery trade receivables consist
of amounts due for services already performed and merchandise
already delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been
provided based on historical experience. Revenue associated with
sales of preneed cemetery interment rights is recognized in
accordance with the retail land sales provisions of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until 10%
of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to the
preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred
until it is constructed and 10% of the sales price is collected.
Revenue associated with sales of preneed merchandise and
services is not recognized until the merchandise is delivered or
the services are performed. Allowances for customer
cancellations for preneed cemetery contracts are based upon
historical experience. For personalized marker merchandise, with
the customers direction generally obtained at the time of
sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the
customer. Upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or
delivery in our cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues
and record the cost of sale. For services and non-personalized
merchandise (such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the
services are performed and the merchandise is delivered. Sales
taxes collected are recognized on a net basis
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from cemetery merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and services
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed.
54
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property
interment rights is required by state or provincial law to be
paid into perpetual care trust funds. Investment earnings from
these trusts are distributed to us regularly, are recognized in
current cemetery revenues and are intended to defray cemetery
maintenance costs, which are expensed as incurred. The principal
of such perpetual care trust funds generally cannot be withdrawn.
Costs related to the sale of property interment rights include
the property and construction costs specifically identified by
project. At the completion of the project, construction costs
are charged to expense in the same period revenue is recognized.
Costs related to sales of merchandise and services are charged
to expense when merchandise is delivered and when services are
performed. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements regarding preneed cemetery activities.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred
taxes are provided on all temporary differences between the
financial bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We
record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets
when uncertainty regarding their realization exists. We intend
to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain of
our foreign subsidiaries in those businesses outside the United
States and, therefore, have not provided for deferred federal
income taxes on such unremitted foreign earnings. For more
information related to income taxes, see Note 11 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Equity
Investments
We maintain certain equity interests in international operations
as a result of our strategy to dispose of all or a majority
interest of our international operations outside of North
America. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we owned a minority
investment of 25% in AKH Luxco S.C.A. in France. We account for
our minority interest equity investments in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. We have not presented summarized financial
information of the investee as it is not material to our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
|
|
3.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
|
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158), which requires recognition of the funded
status of a benefit plan in the balance sheet. SFAS 158
also requires recognition, in other comprehensive income, of
certain gains and losses that arise during the period but which
were deferred under previous pension accounting rules.
SFAS 158 also modifies the requirements for the timing of
reports and disclosures. SFAS 158 provides recognition and
disclosure elements that are effective for us during the year
ended December 31, 2006 and measurement date elements that
will be effective for us during the year ended December 31,
2008. We have initiated the process to terminate our cash
balance plan in 2007. We adopted SFAS 158 effective
December 31, 2006 and as a result we reclassed
$0.6 million of unamortized prior service costs from
Other long-term liabilities to Accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Effective January 1, 2004, we changed our accounting for
gains and losses on our pension plan assets and obligations. We
now recognize pension gains and losses in our consolidated
statement of operations as such gains and losses are incurred.
Prior to the adoption of this change, we amortized the
difference between actual and expected investment returns and
actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the
extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). We believe the new method of accounting better
reflects the economic nature of our pension plans and recognize
gains and losses on the pension plan assets and liabilities in
the year the gains or losses occur. As a result of this
accounting change, we recognized a cumulative effect charge of
$36.6 million (net of tax) as of January 1, 2004. This
amount represented accumulated unrecognized net losses related
to the pension plan assets and liabilities. Under the new
accounting policy, we record net pension expense or
55
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets and
obligations for our interim financial statements, and recognized
actual gains and losses on plan assets and obligations for the
full-year (annual) financial statements as actuarial information
becomes available upon review of the annual remeasurement. See
Note 17 to these consolidated financial statements for
additional information on pensions.
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) was issued, which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective
beginning January 1, 2008 for us. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue
No. 06-5,
Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance
Determining the Amount that Could be Realized in Accordance with
FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-4
(EITF 06-5).
The EITF concluded that a policyholder should consider any
additional amounts included in the contractual terms of the life
insurance policy in determining the amount that could be
realized under the insurance contract. For group policies
with multiple certificates or multiple policies with a group
rider, the EITF also tentatively concluded that the amount that
could be realized should be determined at the individual policy
or certificate level, (i.e., amounts that would be realized only
upon surrendering all of the policies or certificates would not
be included when measuring the assets). The provisions of EITF
06-5 are
effective beginning January 1, 2007 for us. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting EITF
06-5 on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC released SAB No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements
when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements (SAB 108), which provides interpretive
guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of
prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a
current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that
registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet
and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either
approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all
relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is
material. The provisions of SAB 108 became effective
beginning November 15, 2006 for us. The impact of
SAB 108 in the future will depend on the nature and extent
of any prior year misstatements, but as of the adoption date,
SAB 108 had no impact to our consolidated financial
statements.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies
the accounting for uncertain income tax positions recognized in
an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS 109. This interpretation requires companies to use a
prescribed model for assessing the financial statement
recognition and measurement of all tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in its tax returns. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for us
on January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the
change in accounting principle, if any, recorded as an
adjustment to opening retained earnings (or as an adjustment to
goodwill, in the case of uncertain tax positions acquired in our
recent Alderwoods merger). Additional guidance from the FASB on
FIN 48 is forthcoming regarding the ultimate settlement of
a tax audit, and such guidance may impact the amount we record
upon our adoption of FIN 48. In addition, we are still
evaluating the uncertain tax positions acquired in our recent
Alderwoods merger. As a result, we continue to evaluate the
effects of adopting this standard.
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155).
SFAS 155 amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), and SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(SFAS 140). This statement also resolves issues
addressed in Statement No. 133 Implementation Issue
No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.
SFAS 155
56
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise
would require bifurcation and clarifies which interest-only
strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the
requirements of SFAS 133. SFAS 140 is amended to
eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity
from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to
a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued during fiscal years beginning
after September 15, 2006 (January 1, 2007 for us). The
adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our method of
accounting for direct selling costs related to the acquisition
of preneed funeral and preneed cemetery contracts. Prior to this
change, we capitalized these direct selling costs and amortized
them in proportion to the revenue recognized. Under the new
method of accounting, we expense direct selling costs as
incurred. We believe the new method is preferable because it
better reflects the economics of our business. We recorded a
cumulative effect charge of $187.5 million, net of tax of
$117.4 million. If we had not changed our method of
accounting for direct selling costs as described above, net
income for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been
approximately $10.5 million or $.03 per basic and
diluted share higher than currently reported. Pro forma net
income for the year ended December 31, 2004, reflecting our
new policy to expense selling costs as incurred, would have been
$101.3 million of $0.31 per diluted share.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. This
interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51,
Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain
entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties.
In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN 46. Under the
provisions of FIN 46R, we are required to consolidate
certain cemeteries and trust assets in our financial statements.
Merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care
trusts are considered variable interest entities because the
trusts meet the conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1)
of FIN 46R. FIN 46R requires that we consolidate
merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care
trusts for which we are the primary beneficiary (i.e., those for
which we absorb a majority of the trusts expected losses).
We are the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of
the assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of
customers.
We implemented FIN 46R on March 31, 2004 and reclassed
relevant amounts from Deferred Preneed Funeral/Cemetery
Revenues to Non-Controlling Interest in Trust
on the balance sheet. Prior to the implementation, we operated
certain cemeteries in Michigan which we managed but did not own.
During our evaluation of FIN 46R, we evaluated these
cemeteries to determine whether such cemeteries were within the
scope of FIN 46R. The investment capital of these
cemeteries was financed by us in exchange for a long-term sales,
accounting, and cash management agreement. In accordance with
this agreement, we receive the majority of the cash flows from
these cemeteries. Additionally, we absorb the majority of these
cemeteries expected losses and receive a majority of the
cemeteries residual returns. As a result, we concluded
that we were the primary beneficiary of these cemeteries and
that the long-term sales, accounting, and cash management
agreement is a variable interest as defined by FIN 46R.
Given the circumstances above, we consolidated such cemeteries
as of March 31, 2004. We recognized an after tax charge of
$14.0 million, representing the cumulative effect of an
accounting change, as a result of consolidating these
cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these
cemeteries are included in our consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004.
Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect
of consolidating these entities does not have a significant
impact on our reported results of operations.
57
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Share-Based
Payment
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the
use of the intrinsic value method of accounting and requires
companies to recognize in the statement of operations the cost
of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
We adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 utilizing the
modified-prospective transition method.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based
payments using the intrinsic value recognition method prescribed
by APB 25. Because all of our stock options were granted at
market value on the date of each grant, no stock-based
compensation expense related to stock options was reflected in
net income prior to adopting SFAS 123R.
Under the modified-prospective transition method, we recognize
compensation expense on a straight-line basis in our
consolidated financial statements issued subsequent to the date
of adoption for all share-based payments granted, modified or
settled after December 31, 2005, as well as for any awards
that were granted prior to December 31, 2005 for which
requisite service will be provided after December 31, 2005.
The compensation expense on awards granted prior to
December 31, 2005 is recognized using the fair values
determined for the pro forma disclosures on stock-based
compensation included in prior filings. The amount of
compensation expense recognized on awards that were not fully
vested at the date of SFAS 123R adoption excludes the
compensation expense cumulatively recognized in the pro forma
disclosures on stock-based compensation. Further, we assume no
forfeitures on restricted shares granted prior to the adoption
of SFAS 123R due to the nature of the employees to whom the
shares were granted; thus, we recorded no cumulative effect of
accounting change upon the adoption of SFAS 123R.
Stock
Benefit Plans
We maintain benefit plans whereby shares of our common stock may
be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or
restricted stock granted to officers and key employees. Our
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves 24,000,000 shares of
common stock for outstanding and future awards of stock options,
restricted stock, and other stock based awards to officers and
key employees.
The benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either
non-qualified or incentive stock options. The options
historically have been granted only once each year, or upon
hire, as approved by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are granted with an exercise price equal
to the market price of our common stock on the date the grant is
approved by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are generally exercisable at a rate of
331/3%
each year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the
compensation committee of the Board of Directors. Restricted
stock awards are generally expensed to income ratably over the
period during which the restrictions lapse. At December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, 2,615,487 and
4,856,459 shares, respectively, were reserved for future
option and restricted stock grants under these stock benefit
plans.
At the adoption of SFAS 123R, 1,959,283 options were
outstanding with alternative vesting methods. These shares were
fully vested prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R and,
as such, compensation expense for these options is not included
in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, 1,868,163
of these options remain outstanding. No additional options with
alternative vesting methods were granted during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
58
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We utilize the Black-Scholes option valuation model for
estimating the fair value of our stock options. This model
allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility,
the risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend
yield. The expected volatility utilized in the valuation model
is based on implied volatilities from traded options on our
stock and the historical volatility of our stock price. The
decrease in expected volatility from the year ended
December 31, 2005 to the year ended December 31, 2006
is primarily the result of a lower implied volatility. The
dividend yield and the expected holding period are both based on
historical experience and managements estimate of future
events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the
U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the expected life of the
option in effect at the time of grant. The fair values of our
stock options are calculated using the following weighted
average assumptions based on the methods described above for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
|
Assumptions
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.3%
|
|
1.5%
|
|
0.0%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
37.9%
|
|
43.3%
|
|
63.8%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.5%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
4.0%
|
Expected holding period
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
8.0 years
|
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, Income from
continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by
$4.0 million, Income from continuing operations and
Net income were both reduced by $2.2 million, and
basic and diluted earnings per share were both reduced by $.01
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Results for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have
not been restated to reflect the impact of compensation expense
for our stock option plans. If, prior to January 1, 2006,
we had elected to recognize compensation expense for our stock
option plans, based on the fair value of awards at the grant
dates, Net (loss) income and (Loss) income per share
would have changed for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 by the following pro forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, as reported
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
110,661
|
|
Deduct: Total pro forma
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method, net of related tax benefit
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|
|
(3,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(129,708
|
)
|
|
$
|
107,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, as reported
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
Deduct: Total pro forma
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method, net of related tax benefit
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic (loss) income per
share
|
|
$
|
(.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, as reported
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
Deduct: Total pro forma
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method, net of related tax benefit
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted (loss) income
per share
|
|
$
|
(.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R, we amortized
stock-based compensation cost for employees eligible to retire
over the three-year standard vesting period of the grants. Upon
adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognize costs on new option
grants to such retirement-eligible employees immediately upon
grant, consistent
59
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
with the retirement vesting acceleration provisions of these
grants. If we had historically computed stock-based compensation
cost for these employees under this accelerated method,
$0.4 million or less than $.01 per diluted share of
after-tax compensation cost would have been accelerated and
cumulatively included in the pro forma expense above for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The tax benefit associated
with this additional compensation expense would have been
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The following table shows a summary of information with respect
to stock option and restricted share compensation for 2006 and
restricted share compensation for 2005 and 2004, which are
included in our consolidated statement of operations for those
respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total pretax share-based
compensation expense included in net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
related to share-based compensation included in net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,198
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
Stock
Options
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the
year ended December 31, 2006:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
24,250,429
|
|
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,614,650
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,414,123
|
)
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(22,300
|
)
|
|
|
6.88
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,897,340
|
)
|
|
|
28.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
22,531,316
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
19,984,931
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value for
stock options outstanding and exercisable was $88.3 million
and $81.9 million, respectively. Set forth below is certain
information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 2006:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Range of
|
|
Outstanding at
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Exercisable at
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - 4.00
|
|
|
6,919,032
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
|
6,919,032
|
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
4.01 - 6.00
|
|
|
4,160,000
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
|
|
|
4,160,000
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
|
6.01 - 9.00
|
|
|
6,160,069
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
|
|
|
3,613,684
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
9.01 - 15.00
|
|
|
2,898,003
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
13.73
|
|
|
|
2,898,003
|
|
|
|
13.73
|
|
15.01 - 21.00
|
|
|
2,285,160
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
19.18
|
|
|
|
2,285,160
|
|
|
|
19.18
|
|
21.01 - 38.00
|
|
|
109,052
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
31.16
|
|
|
|
109,052
|
|
|
|
31.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - 38.00
|
|
|
22,531,316
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
19,984,931
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other information pertaining to option activity during the years
ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted average grant-date fair
value of stock options granted (valued using Black-Scholes model)
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
Total fair value of stock options
vested
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
|
$
|
69,155
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
$
|
7,523
|
|
|
$
|
7,271
|
|
We calculated our historical pool of windfall tax benefits by
comparing the book expense for individual stock grants and the
related tax deduction for options granted after January 1,
1995. Adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits
that were not realized due to our net operating loss position.
Upon completion of this calculation, we determined an additional
paid in capital pool of $2.1 million. Our additional paid
in capital as of December 31, 2006 was $2.0 million
For the year ended December 31, 2006, cash received from
the exercise of stock options was $5.9 million. As of
December 31, 2006, the unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options of $3.9 million is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
Restricted
Shares
Restricted shares awarded under the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan
were 359,900 in 2006 and 498,800 in 2005. The weighted average
fair market value per share at the date of grant for shares
granted during 2006 and 2005 was $8.24 and $6.90, respectively.
The fair market value of the stock, as determined on the grant
date, is being amortized and charged to income (with an
offsetting credit to Capital in excess of par value)
generally over the average period during which the restrictions
lapse. At December 31, 2006, unrecognized compensation
expense of $3.3 million related to restricted shares, which
is recorded in Capital in excess of par value on the
balance sheet, is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.4 years. Prior to the implementation of
SFAS 123R, we recorded this compensation as Unrecognized
compensation on the balance sheet. We recognized
compensation cost of $3.0 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006 related to the restricted shares of this
Plan. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we
recognized compensation cost of $2.1 million and
$0.9 million, respectively, related to the restricted
shares of this Plan.
Restricted share activity was as follows:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
779,850
|
|
|
$
|
6.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
359,900
|
|
|
$
|
8.24
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(341,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,767
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
795,176
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Alderwoods
Acquisition
|
On November 28, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
common stock of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for
$20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a purchase price of
approximately $1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing
of $357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million
of Alderwoods debt. Included in our results of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2006 are the results of
Alderwoods operations from the date of acquisition through
December 31, 2006.
61
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The primary reasons for the merger and the principal factors
that contributed to the recognition of goodwill in this
acquisition were:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods creates a stronger company with
the benefits of increased size and scale, enabling us to serve a
number of new, complementary areas;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods preneed backlog of deferred
revenues enhances our long-term stability; and
|
|
|
|
combining the two companies operations provides
significant synergies and related cost savings.
|
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price to specific
assets and liabilities was based, in part, upon the
consideration of an outside appraisal of the fair value of
Alderwoods assets and from information obtained from the
accounting systems of Alderwoods. To the extent that information
not available to us at the closing date subsequently becomes
available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust goodwill, assets, or liabilities
associated with the acquisition. The following table summarizes,
based on the year-end preliminary purchase price allocation, the
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of
November 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
58,746
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
207,995
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
675,334
|
|
Preneed funeral and cemetery
receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
897,593
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
169,847
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
406,024
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
183,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
2,598,577
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
115,098
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,997
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery revenues and non-controlling interest in trusts
|
|
|
893,493
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
316,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,335,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
1,263,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price, as reflected above, has
not been adjusted for planned divestitures as described in
Note 21.
Goodwill, land and certain identifiable intangible assets
recorded in the acquisition are not subject to amortization;
however, the goodwill and intangible assets will be tested
periodically for impairment as required by SFAS 142. Of the
$183.0 million in goodwill recognized, $22.6 million
was allocated to our cemetery segment
62
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and $160.4 million was allocated to our funeral segment.
None of this goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The
$169.8 million in identified intangible assets consists of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Asset
|
Preneed customer relationships
related to insurance claims
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
$
|
16,900
|
|
Referral relationships
|
|
|
10-20 years
|
|
|
|
16,400
|
|
Preneed deferred revenue
|
|
|
10-14 years
|
|
|
|
87,147
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Licenses and permits
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Water rights
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
169,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information
as if the merger had occurred as of January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,353,051
|
|
|
$
|
2,368,754
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effects of accounting change
|
|
|
15,505
|
|
|
|
64,341
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
(117,704
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effects of accounting change per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.21
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.21
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
(.39
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
(.39
|
)
|
|
|
6.
|
Preneed
Funeral Activities
|
Preneed
Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of
allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments,
including investment earnings and customer receivables related
to unperformed, price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts. When
we, as the primary beneficiary, receive payments from the
customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust
and reclassify the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed
funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trusts. Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts
after the contract is performed. We deposited
$77.7 million, $72.0 million, and $46.8 million
into and withdrew $109.8 million, $97.1 million, and
$65.2 million from trusts during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Cash flows
from preneed funeral contracts are presented as operating cash
flows in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
63
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments in our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
|
$
|
1,046,958
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
224,740
|
|
|
|
204,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554,662
|
|
|
|
1,251,138
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(37,986
|
)
|
|
|
(24,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for contract cancellation is estimated based on
historical experience. Upon cancellation of a trust funded
preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to
receive a refund of the funds held in trust. In many
jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the
amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust
including investment returns. Therefore, when realized or
unrealized losses of a trust result in preneed funeral contracts
being insufficient to meet contingent customer withdrawals, we
assess such contracts to determine whether a loss provision
should be recorded. No such loss provisions were required to be
recognized as of December 31, 2006 or 2005.
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are
reduced by the trust investment earnings (realized and
unrealized) that we have been allowed to withdraw in certain
states prior to maturity. These earnings are recorded in
Deferred preneed funeral revenues until the service is
performed or the merchandise is delivered.
The activity in Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,784
|
|
|
$
|
1,080,108
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
121,287
|
|
|
|
132,157
|
|
|
|
104,259
|
|
Cash receipts from customers
|
|
|
(110,438
|
)
|
|
|
(109,879
|
)
|
|
|
(94,522
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
77,691
|
|
|
|
71,961
|
|
|
|
67,527
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of
businesses, net
|
|
|
256,138
|
|
|
|
(17,257
|
)
|
|
|
(9,323
|
)
|
Net undistributed investment
earnings
|
|
|
82,007
|
|
|
|
27,140
|
|
|
|
39,479
|
|
Maturities and distributed earnings
|
|
|
(130,852
|
)
|
|
|
(131,651
|
)
|
|
|
(122,212
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(10,714
|
)
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
Sale of debt associated with
certain trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,964
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
28,451
|
|
|
|
(26,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed
funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with funeral trust
investments at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are detailed
below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of
control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of
the underlying securities or cash held by the common trust
funds, mutual funds at published values and the estimated market
value of private equity investments (including debt as well as
the estimated fair value related to the contract holders
equity in majority-owned real estate investments). The fair
market value of funeral trust investments, which in the
aggregate
64
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
represented 102% of the related cost basis of such investments
as of December 31, 2006, was based primarily on quoted
market prices at December 31, 2006 and 2005. We assess our
trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair
value, as defined in SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, on a
quarterly basis. Any impairment charges taken as a result of
other-than-temporary declines in fair value are recognized as
investment losses and offset by interest income related to
non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments in
other income in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. As a result of our most recent reviews at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded no adjustments to
cost for the unrealized losses related to certain private equity
and other investments. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information related to
non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
235,178
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
235,178
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
72,280
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
73,650
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
86,770
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
86,907
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
4,390
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
203,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,709
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
756
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
328,672
|
|
|
|
22,425
|
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
348,399
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
124,154
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
136,511
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
212,302
|
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
|
(2,254
|
)
|
|
|
218,609
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
76,783
|
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
(14,313
|
)
|
|
|
65,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,349,786
|
|
|
$
|
49,635
|
|
|
$
|
(20,645
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,378,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with
businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
61,369
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,369
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
93,152
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
94,839
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
81,842
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
81,692
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,749
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
7,945
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
89,971
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
|
|
92,045
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
207,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,887
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
889
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
299,118
|
|
|
|
13,818
|
|
|
|
(4,157
|
)
|
|
|
308,779
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
69,070
|
|
|
|
10,322
|
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
78,620
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
83,030
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
83,245
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
34,019
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
29,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,028,076
|
|
|
$
|
33,003
|
|
|
$
|
(14,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,046,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as of a percentage of
cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2007 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2006 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
125,942
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
61,649
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
90,679
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
95,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
373,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have determined that unrealized losses in the funeral trust
investments at both December 31, 2006 and 2005 are
considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were
due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity
prices. We believe that none of the securities are other than
temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the investments as
well as our discussions with trustees, money managers and
consultants. Our funeral trust investment unrealized losses,
their durations and the fair market value as of
December 31, 2006, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
8,212
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
10,340
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
19,979
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
4,991
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
65,846
|
|
|
|
(2,631
|
)
|
|
|
70,837
|
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
14,713
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
10,728
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
25,441
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
18,581
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
76,803
|
|
|
|
(2,103
|
)
|
|
|
95,384
|
|
|
|
(2,254
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
|
35,745
|
|
|
|
(13,245
|
)
|
|
|
42,344
|
|
|
|
(14,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
|
$
|
55,745
|
|
|
$
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
$
|
210,785
|
|
|
|
(19,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
266,530
|
|
|
$
|
(20,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$646.7 million and $862.5 million, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $83.4 million and
$36.7 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$835.0 million and $1,036.0 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $56.6 million and
$19.5 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively for the year ended December 31, 2005. During
the nine months ended December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004
subsequent to the adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales
of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments
were $951.7 million and 1,019.1 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $89.5 million and
$56.9 million of realized gains and losses, respectively,
for the nine months ended December 31, 2004. We use the
first in, first out (FIFO) method to determine the cost of
funeral trust
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
funeral revenues when the service is performed, merchandise is
delivered, or upon cancellation of the amount we are entitled to
retain. Recognized earnings (realized and unrealized) related to
these trust investments were $35.1 million,
$37.8 million, and $35.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Funeral Revenues
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Deferred preneed funeral
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future funeral service revenues, including distributed trust
investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded
preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed funeral revenues are recognized in
current funeral revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Future funeral
67
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
service revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held
in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling interest in
funeral and cemetery trusts.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed funeral revenues for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net
|
|
$
|
535,384
|
|
|
$
|
540,794
|
|
|
$
|
1,464,218
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
107,291
|
|
|
|
129,459
|
|
|
|
97,611
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of
businesses, net
|
|
|
25,758
|
|
|
|
(18,253
|
)
|
|
|
(19,014
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
76,127
|
|
|
|
22,783
|
|
|
|
37,219
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed
revenues
|
|
|
(136,376
|
)
|
|
|
(157,861
|
)
|
|
|
(138,820
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(7,815
|
)
|
|
|
(5,539
|
)
|
|
|
(6,179
|
)
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(52,512
|
)
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
179,459
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
(10,065
|
)
|
|
|
15,834
|
|
|
|
(28,547
|
)
|
Adoption of FIN 46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,045,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net
|
|
$
|
537,792
|
|
|
$
|
535,384
|
|
|
$
|
540,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded
Preneed Funeral Contracts
Not included in the consolidated balance sheet are
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded
by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party
insurers. Prior to the adoption of FIN 46R on
March 31, 2004, the net amount of these contracts was
included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
with a corresponding liability in Deferred preneed
funeral revenues. The proceeds of the life insurance
policies or annuity contracts will be reflected in funeral
revenues as these funerals are performed by the Company.
|
|
7.
|
Preneed
Cemetery Activities
|
Preneed
Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net
of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments,
including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when
the property interment rights, merchandise or services are
needed. When we, as the primary beneficiary, receive payments
from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into
the trust, remove the corresponding amount from Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues, and record the amount into
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract is
performed. We deposited $117.5 million,
$114.3 million, and $104.3 million into and withdrew
$88.7 million, $128.2 million, and $90.9 million
from the trusts during the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005, and 2004, respectively. Cash flows from preneed cemetery
contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our
consolidated statement of cash flows.
68
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
|
$
|
982,755
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
384,428
|
|
|
|
406,087
|
|
Unearned finance charges
|
|
|
(54,704
|
)
|
|
|
(64,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566,170
|
|
|
|
1,323,927
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(43,586
|
)
|
|
|
(35,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activity in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,399,778
|
|
|
|
1,068,216
|
|
Net sales including deferred and
recognized revenue
|
|
|
324,713
|
|
|
|
334,615
|
|
|
|
337,710
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of
businesses, net
|
|
|
155,224
|
|
|
|
(65,112
|
)
|
|
|
(21,531
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
107,760
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
|
|
|
32,869
|
|
Cash receipts from customers, net
of refunds
|
|
|
(381,688
|
)
|
|
|
(368,234
|
)
|
|
|
(385,350
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
117,518
|
|
|
|
114,303
|
|
|
|
128,536
|
|
Maturities, deliveries, and
associated earnings
|
|
|
(88,673
|
)
|
|
|
(128,196
|
)
|
|
|
(120,216
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
17,772
|
|
Sale of debt associated with
certain trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,803
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
17,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed
cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,399,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments at December 31,
2006 and 2005 are detailed below.
Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control
holders in common trust funds, mutual funds and private equity
investments. Fair market value represents the value of the
underlying securities or cash held by the common trust funds,
mutual funds at published values and the estimated market value
of private equity investments (including debt as well as the
estimated fair value related to the contract holders
equity in majority-owned real estate alternative investments).
The fair market value of cemetery trust investments, which in
the aggregate represented 105% of the related cost basis of such
investments as of December 31, 2006, was based primarily on
quoted market prices at December 31, 2006 and 2005. We
assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines
in fair value, as defined in SFAS 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,
on a quarterly basis. Any impairment charges taken as a result
of other-than-temporary declines in fair value are recognized as
investment losses and offset by interest income related to
non-controlling interest in cemetery trust investments in
other income in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. As a result of our most recent reviews at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded no adjustments for
the unrealized losses related to certain private equity
69
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and other investments. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information related to
non-controlling interest in cemetery trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
258,365
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,365
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
61,785
|
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
(2,147
|
)
|
|
|
63,833
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
25,187
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
25,902
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
300,188
|
|
|
|
26,726
|
|
|
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|
|
325,158
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
208,396
|
|
|
|
28,309
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
235,976
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
374,636
|
|
|
|
21,204
|
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
392,801
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
32,501
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
(7,869
|
)
|
|
|
25,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,268,335
|
|
|
$
|
82,251
|
|
|
$
|
(15,614
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,334,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with
businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
89,493
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,493
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
121,291
|
|
|
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
127,189
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
21,456
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
22,325
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
13,171
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
13,823
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
173,214
|
|
|
|
10,023
|
|
|
|
(1,534
|
)
|
|
|
181,703
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
286,325
|
|
|
|
19,623
|
|
|
|
(2,530
|
)
|
|
|
303,418
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
133,817
|
|
|
|
22,124
|
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
155,119
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
65,921
|
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
|
66,902
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
23,707
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3,373
|
)
|
|
|
20,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
930,724
|
|
|
$
|
62,505
|
|
|
$
|
(10,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
982,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of
cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2007 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2006 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
18,514
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
23,642
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
33,677
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
19,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have determined that unrealized losses in the cemetery trust
investments are considered temporary in nature, as the
unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest
rates and equity prices. We believe that none of the securities
are other than temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as discussions with trustees, money managers
and consultants. Our cemetery trust investment unrealized
losses, their durations and their fair market value as of
December 31, 2006, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,796
|
|
|
$
|
(2,145
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,983
|
|
|
$
|
(2,147
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4,364
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
5,503
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
75,466
|
|
|
|
(1,747
|
)
|
|
|
76,491
|
|
|
|
(1,756
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
17,479
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
22,308
|
|
|
|
(668
|
)
|
|
|
39,787
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
43,930
|
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
108,388
|
|
|
|
(2,577
|
)
|
|
|
152,318
|
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,817
|
|
|
|
(7,869
|
)
|
|
|
23,271
|
|
|
|
(7,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
|
$
|
67,239
|
|
|
$
|
(539
|
)
|
|
$
|
248,050
|
|
|
$
|
(15,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,289
|
|
|
$
|
(15,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$772.9 million and $990.1 million, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $100.3 million and
$47.3 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$916.0 million and $1.0 billion, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $67.7 million and
$21.5 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively for year ended December 31, 2005. During the
nine months ended December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004
subsequent to the adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales
of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments
were $837.9 million and $829.3 million, respectively.
These transactions resulted in $81.0 million and
$62.4 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the nine months ended December 31, 2004.
We use the FIFO method to determine the cost of cemetery trust
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
cemetery revenues when the service is performed or the
merchandise is delivered or upon cancellation of the amount we
are entitled to retain. Recognized earnings
71
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments
were $15.0 million, $13.0 million, and
$7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Cemetery Revenues
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future cemetery revenues, including distributed trust investment
earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed
cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues are recognized in
current cemetery revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise delivered. Future cemetery revenues and net trust
investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included
in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
792,485
|
|
|
$
|
803,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,187
|
|
Net preneed and atneed deferred
sales
|
|
|
311,077
|
|
|
|
308,202
|
|
|
|
256,635
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of
businesses, net
|
|
|
(12,073
|
)
|
|
|
(68,378
|
)
|
|
|
(17,636
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
103,587
|
|
|
|
27,260
|
|
|
|
35,748
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed
revenues
|
|
|
(320,076
|
)
|
|
|
(315,663
|
)
|
|
|
(269,771
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
(12,946
|
)
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(129,180
|
)
|
|
|
27,889
|
|
|
|
(74,902
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
754,193
|
|
|
$
|
792,485
|
|
|
$
|
803,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Cemetery
Perpetual Care Trusts
|
We are required by state or provincial law to pay into perpetual
care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery
property interment rights. As the primary beneficiary of the
trusts, we consolidate the perpetual care trust investments with
a corresponding amount recorded as Non-controlling interest
in perpetual care trusts. We deposited $22.5 million,
$21.3 million, and $16.1 million into trusts and
withdrew $43.3 million, $28.1 million, and
$24.5 million from trusts during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), respectively. Cash flows from
cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as operating
cash flows in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
72
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The cost and market values associated with trust investments
held in perpetual care trusts at December 31, 2006 and 2005
are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of
redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual
funds and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities or cash held
by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values and
the estimated market value of private equity investments
(including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to
the contract holders equity in majority-owned real estate
investments). The fair market value of perpetual care trusts,
which in the aggregate represented 104% of the related cost
basis of such investments as of December 31, 2006, was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2006 or 2005. We assess our trust investments for
other-than-temporary declines in fair value, as defined in
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities, on a quarterly basis. Any
impairment charges taken as a result of other-than-temporary
declines in fair value are recognized as investment losses and
offset by interest income related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments in other income in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result of our most
recent reviews at December 31, 2006 and 2005, we did not
record an adjustment to cost for the years ended
December 31, 2006 or 2005. See Note 9 to the
consolidated financial statements for further information
related to non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust
investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
167,464
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,464
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
11,557
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
28,738
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
29,589
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
24,067
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
25,309
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
86,945
|
|
|
|
8,806
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
95,636
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
61,498
|
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
66,363
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
481,267
|
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
|
|
503,884
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
38,424
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
(2,170
|
)
|
|
|
38,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
908,530
|
|
|
$
|
43,798
|
|
|
$
|
(4,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with
businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,647
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,647
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
63,102
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
64,977
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
32,456
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
33,788
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
71,642
|
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
73,280
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
117,626
|
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
120,312
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
26,992
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
27,610
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
12,833
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
14,021
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
90,160
|
|
|
|
3,984
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
93,933
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
43,204
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
45,351
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
144,294
|
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
146,086
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
31,041
|
|
|
|
5,428
|
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
35,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
678,997
|
|
|
$
|
24,340
|
|
|
$
|
(2,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
700,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of
cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have determined that unrealized losses in the perpetual care
trust investments are considered temporary in nature, as the
unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest
rates and equity prices. We believe that none of the securities
are other than temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as our
74
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
discussions with trustees, money managers and consultants. Our
perpetual care trust investment unrealized losses, their
durations and fair market values as of December 31, 2006,
are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,362
|
|
|
$
|
(116
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
11,265
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
81,634
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
33,409
|
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
115,043
|
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
4,419
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
(2,016
|
)
|
|
|
17,849
|
|
|
|
(2,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
|
$
|
91,084
|
|
|
$
|
(582
|
)
|
|
$
|
62,988
|
|
|
$
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
$
|
154,072
|
|
|
$
|
(4,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2007 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2006 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
18,384
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
21,036
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
12,401
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
15,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities in the perpetual care trust were $915.9 million
and $1.1 billion, respectively. These sale transactions
resulted in $40.9 million and $26.7 million of
realized gains and realized losses, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities in the perpetual care trusts were $920.0 million
and $970.3 million, respectively. These sales transactions
resulted in $19.1 million and $9.7 million of realized
gains and realized losses, respectively. During the nine months
ended December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to
the adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales of
available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were
$754.5 million and $771.8 million, respectively. These
sales transactions resulted in $34.4 million and
$9.1 million of realized gains and losses, respectively. We
use the FIFO method to determine the cost of perpetual care
trusts
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust
investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the
extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized
earnings related to these perpetual care trust investments were
$42.1 million, $26.4 million, and $32.5 million
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively.
75
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Non-Controlling
Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts and in Perpetual Care
Trusts
|
Non-Controlling
Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts
We consolidate in our balance sheet the merchandise and service
trusts associated with our preneed funeral and cemetery
activities as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R.
Although FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the
merchandise and service trusts, it does not change the legal
relationships among the trusts, us or our customers. The
customers are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and
service trusts, and therefore, their interests in these trusts
represent a non-controlling interest in subsidiaries.
Non-Controlling
Interest in Perpetual Care Trusts
The Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
reflected in the consolidated balance sheet represents the
cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and
other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts.
The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trusts and Non-controlling interest in perpetual
care trusts in our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Perpetual Care
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
|
$
|
2,566,368
|
|
|
$
|
893,931
|
|
Less: Accrued trust operating
payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|
|
(11,573
|
)
|
|
|
(17,625
|
)
|
|
|
(6,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$
|
1,323,870
|
|
|
$
|
1,224,873
|
|
|
$
|
2,548,743
|
|
|
$
|
887,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Perpetual Care
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$
|
1,046,958
|
|
|
$
|
982,755
|
|
|
$
|
2,029,713
|
|
|
$
|
700,382
|
|
Less: Accrued trust operating
payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
(5,054
|
)
|
|
|
(8,848
|
)
|
|
|
(13,902
|
)
|
|
|
(5,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$
|
1,041,904
|
|
|
$
|
973,907
|
|
|
$
|
2,015,811
|
|
|
$
|
694,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Income, Net
The components of Other income, net in our consolidated
statement of operations for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005 are detailed below. See notes 6 through 8 to
the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of
the amounts related to the funeral, cemetery and perpetual care
trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
83,350
|
|
|
$
|
100,326
|
|
|
$
|
40,934
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,610
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(36,653
|
)
|
|
|
(47,256
|
)
|
|
|
(26,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,584
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other
ordinary income
|
|
|
22,614
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
|
|
30,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,832
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,989
|
)
|
|
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
60,819
|
|
|
|
76,418
|
|
|
|
42,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,229
|
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trust
investments
|
|
|
(60,819
|
)
|
|
|
(76,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,237
|
)
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,124
|
|
|
$
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
56,560
|
|
|
$
|
67,732
|
|
|
$
|
19,088
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,380
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(19,503
|
)
|
|
|
(21,506
|
)
|
|
|
(9,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,727
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other
ordinary income
|
|
|
19,894
|
|
|
|
23,458
|
|
|
|
29,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,351
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(11,924
|
)
|
|
|
(13,419
|
)
|
|
|
(8,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
45,027
|
|
|
|
56,265
|
|
|
|
30,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,011
|
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trust
investments
|
|
|
(45,027
|
)
|
|
|
(56,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,292
|
)
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
89,500
|
|
|
$
|
80,987
|
|
|
$
|
34,430
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,917
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(56,852
|
)
|
|
|
(62,368
|
)
|
|
|
(9,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,312
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other
ordinary income
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
18,622
|
|
|
|
26,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,787
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(5,775
|
)
|
|
|
(7,422
|
)
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
40,582
|
|
|
|
29,819
|
|
|
|
44,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,913
|
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trust
investments
|
|
|
(40,582
|
)
|
|
|
(29,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,401
|
)
|
Interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,668
|
|
|
$
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts included within Other income, net primarily
relate to investment income from the redemption of convertible
preferred equity certificates, foreign currency gains and
losses, and override commissions from a third party insurance
company. |
78
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for our funeral
and cemetery segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2004
|
|
$
|
1,166,657
|
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
|
$
|
1,169,040
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to
dispositions
|
|
|
(46,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(49,292
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
4,016
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
1,123,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123,888
|
|
Increase in goodwill related to
acquisitions
|
|
|
165,308
|
|
|
|
22,606
|
|
|
|
187,914
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to
dispositions
|
|
|
(48,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,605
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and
other
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
1,241,666
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision or benefit for income taxes includes
U.S. federal income taxes, determined on a consolidated
return basis, foreign, state and local income taxes.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
85,928
|
|
|
$
|
71,311
|
|
|
$
|
66,155
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
15,816
|
|
|
|
43,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
$
|
87,127
|
|
|
$
|
109,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended
December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
|
$
|
2,328
|
|
|
$
|
(27,916
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8,236
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(4,170
|
)
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,588
|
|
|
$
|
7,182
|
|
|
$
|
(26,386
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
33,114
|
|
|
$
|
38,128
|
|
|
$
|
10,662
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,982
|
)
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
10,311
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
(18,978
|
)
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,257
|
|
|
$
|
24,854
|
|
|
$
|
18,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
$
|
32,036
|
|
|
$
|
(8,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We made income tax payments on continuing operations of
approximately $15.8 million, $6.6 million, and
$10.8 million, excluding income tax refunds of
$11.4 million, $29.5 million, and $2.6 million,
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively.
79
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rate and our effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Computed tax provision at the
applicable federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
$
|
34,108
|
|
|
$
|
30,494
|
|
|
$
|
39,207
|
|
State and local taxes, net of
federal income tax benefits
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
(10,081
|
)
|
|
|
(2,259
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction and
tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
Foreign jurisdiction differences
|
|
|
(1,343
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Write down of assets and other
losses with no tax benefit
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
(6,915
|
)
|
Tax provision (benefit) associated
with dispositions
|
|
|
9,508
|
|
|
|
11,799
|
|
|
|
(34,297
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
$
|
32,036
|
|
|
$
|
(8,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effective tax rate
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
36.8
|
%
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
are measured using the enacted marginal tax rates. The tax
effects of temporary differences and carry-forwards that give
rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Inventories and cemetery property,
principally due to purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
$
|
353,797
|
|
|
$
|
382,391
|
|
Property and equipment,
principally due to differences in depreciation methods and
purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,724
|
|
Goodwill, principally due to
amortization methods
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
|
|
40,541
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
46,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, principally due to
sales of cemetery interment rights and related products
|
|
|
128,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
176,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
718,648
|
|
|
|
456,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue on preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts, principally due to earnings from
trust funds
|
|
|
(258,692
|
)
|
|
|
(147,764
|
)
|
Property and equipment,
principally related to book-tax differences in depreciation
methods and purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(75,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,771
|
)
|
Receivables, principally due to
sales of cemetery interment rights and related products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,123
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,642
|
)
|
Loss and tax credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
(273,778
|
)
|
|
|
(126,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(607,931
|
)
|
|
|
(343,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
70,547
|
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
181,264
|
|
|
$
|
147,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certain deferred tax liabilities related to our ability to
utilize U.S. Federal operating loss carry-forwards have
been reclassified from their respective individual components to
directly reduce the loss carry-forward deferred tax asset with
no change to net deferred income taxes. This reclassification
has been applied to the current and prior year amounts to assist
in comparability. The 2006 increase in valuation allowance is
due to a $5.5 million increase in valuation on tax losses
in foreign jurisdictions and a $30.3 million increase in
valuation allowance on state operating losses attributable
mostly to the Alderwoods acquisition. At December 31, 2006,
the loss and credit carryforward tax assets and associated
valuation allowances by jurisdiction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
State
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
152,700
|
|
|
$
|
104,328
|
|
|
$
|
16,750
|
|
|
$
|
273,778
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
57,397
|
|
|
$
|
10,555
|
|
|
$
|
70,547
|
|
Current refundable income taxes and current deferred tax assets
are included in Other current assets, while long-term
deferred tax assets are included in Deferred charges and
other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Current
taxes payable and current deferred tax liabilities are reflected
as Income taxes in the consolidated balance sheet and
long-term tax liabilities are included in Other liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company has tax
receivables of $8.3 million and $17.3 million at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
We have multi-jurisdictional long-term tax liabilities of
$104.9 million and $104.9 million at December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, U.S. income taxes had
not been provided on $71.9 million and $34.6 million,
respectively, of the remaining undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries since we intend not to remit these earnings. We
intend to permanently reinvest these undistributed foreign
earnings in those businesses outside the United States and,
therefore, has not provided for U.S. income taxes on such
earnings. The amount at December 31, 2005 included
$6.2 million of undistributed earnings related to our
former Singapore operations, which were sold in October 2006.
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and ultimately
resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies
depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the
Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our tax returns
for 1999 through 2002 and various state jurisdictions are
auditing years through 2004. In Spain and France, the Taxing
authorities are auditing various tax returns. While it is often
difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of
resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our
accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax
contingencies. It is reasonably possible that certain of these
audits will be settled in 2007 or 2008. Unfavorable settlement
of any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or
require the use of cash. Favorable resolution could result in
reduced income tax expense reported in our future years
consolidated financial statements. Our tax accruals are
presented in the balance sheet within Deferred income taxes
and Other liabilities.
Various subsidiaries have foreign, federal and state
carry-forwards of $2.5 billion with expiration dates
through 2025. We believe that some uncertainty exists with
respect to future realization of certain loss carry-forwards,
therefore a valuation allowance has been established for those
carry-forwards where uncertainty exists. The valuation allowance
is primarily attributable to state net operating losses and is
due to complexities of the various state laws restricting state
net operating loss utilization.
81
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The loss carry-forwards will expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
|
|
29,660
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
34,579
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
2,161
|
|
|
$
|
14,648
|
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
17,261
|
|
2008
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
21,701
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
22,931
|
|
2009
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
21,209
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
|
|
28,755
|
|
2010
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
23,259
|
|
2011
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
21,231
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
496,328
|
|
|
|
1,798,409
|
|
|
|
26,478
|
|
|
|
2,321,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
506,203
|
|
|
$
|
1,928,917
|
|
|
$
|
34,339
|
|
|
$
|
2,469,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
7.2% notes due June 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,698
|
|
6.875% notes due October 2007
|
|
|
13,497
|
|
|
|
13,497
|
|
6.5% notes due March 2008
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
7.7% notes due April 2009
|
|
|
202,588
|
|
|
|
341,635
|
|
7.875% debentures due
February 2013
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
7.375% senior notes due
October 2014
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75% notes due April 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
7.0% notes due June 2017
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
7.625% senior notes due
October 2018
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan due 2009
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A and Series B
senior notes due November 2011
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities
through 2013, fixed interest rates from 4.75% to 5.25%,
conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
113,484
|
|
|
|
11,425
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt,
maturities through 2050
|
|
|
26,304
|
|
|
|
29,588
|
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and
other
|
|
|
(7,553
|
)
|
|
|
(22,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,958,872
|
|
|
|
1,207,201
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(46,176
|
)
|
|
|
(20,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,912,696
|
|
|
$
|
1,186,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated debt had a weighted average interest rate of
7.30% and 7.11% at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Approximately 82% and 99% of the total debt had a
fixed interest rate at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
82
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of debt for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
46,176
|
|
2008
|
|
|
221,888
|
|
2009
|
|
|
317,742
|
|
2010
|
|
|
36,136
|
|
2011
|
|
|
220,194
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,116,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,958,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
Credit Facility
We entered into a new five-year $450 million bank credit
facility in November 2006 with a syndicate of financial
institutions, comprised of a $300 million revolving credit
facility and a $150 million term loan facility, including a
sublimit of $175 million for letters of credit. The term
loan was funded under the credit facility, and will accrue at
2-month LIBOR plus 2.0% (7.35% at December 31, 2006). We
prepaid $50 million of the term loan in December 2006. The
$300 million revolving credit facility was not funded in
2006.
The bank credit facility matures in November 2011. As of
December 31, 2006, we have used the facility to support
$61.1 million of letters of credit. The credit facility
provides us with flexibility for working capital cash, if needed
and is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiary
guaranty is a guaranty of payment of the outstanding amount of
the total lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit
facility, including extensions, and totaled a maximum potential
amount of $61.1 million at December 31, 2006. The
credit facility contains certain financial covenants, including
a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio,
maximum capital expenditure limitations, certain cash
distribution and share repurchase restrictions. As of
December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of our
debt covenants. Interest rates for the outstanding borrowings
are based on various indices as determined by management. We
also pay a quarterly fee on the unused commitment, which ranges
from 0.25% to 0.50%.
Debt
Issuances and Additions
On November 28, 2006, in connection with the closing of the
Alderwoods acquisition, SCI issued $200.0 million of
privately placed debt securities, consisting of
$50.0 million of Floating Rate Series A Senior Notes
due October 2011 and $150.0 million of Floating Rate
Series B Notes due October 2011. Interest on these
privately placed debt securities will accrue at the rate of
6-month LIBOR plus 2.0% (7.37% at December 31, 2006) and
will be payable quarterly in arrears.
On October 3, 2006, we completed a private offering of
$500.0 million aggregate principal unsecured senior notes,
consisting of $250.0 million aggregate principal of
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 million
aggregate principal of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2018. The
proceeds from this offering were held in escrow pending
consummation of the Alderwoods acquisition. We are entitled to
redeem the notes at any time by paying a make-whole premium. The
notes are subject to the provisions of our Senior Indenture
dated as of February 1, 1993, as amended, which includes
certain covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of
liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback transactions.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed the required
registration statement and exchanged publicly held registered
notes for the unregistered Notes.
On June 15, 2005, we issued $300.0 million in an
unregistered offering of senior unsecured 7.00% notes due
2017, which pay interest semi-annually beginning
December 15, 2005. We used the net proceeds, together with
available cash, to purchase existing indebtedness pursuant to
the tender offer described in Debt Extinguishments
83
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and Reductions. The notes are subject to the provisions
of our Senior Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as
amended, which includes certain covenants limiting, among other
things, the creation of liens securing indebtedness and
sale-leaseback transactions. We are entitled to redeem the notes
at any time by paying a make-whole premium. Under the terms of
the issuance of the unregistered notes, we have an obligation to
register the notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Because we did not file the related SEC registration
statement within the required time period, we incurred an
aggregate incremental interest expense of $2.7 million and
$0.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we
filed the required registration statement and consummated an
exchange offer for the unregistered Notes.
Debt
Extinguishments and Reductions
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we purchased $139.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 7.70% notes
due 2009 in a tender offering. As a result of this transaction,
we recognized a loss of $17.5 million recorded in Loss
on early extinguishment of debt, in our consolidated
statement of operations. Also in the fourth quarter of 2006, we
redeemed $11.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
debentures associated with the acquisitions of various
locations. These transactions resulted in no recognized gain or
loss.
During the second quarter of 2006, our 7.2% notes matured,
and we made a payment consisting of $10.7 million in
principal and $0.4 million in interest to the debtholders
and redeemed $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
debentures associated with the acquisition of various locations.
These transactions resulted in no recognized gain or loss.
In the first quarter of 2005, we purchased $7.1 million
aggregate principal amount of our 7.70% notes due 2009 in
the open market. As a result of this transaction, we recognized
a loss of $1.2 million recorded in Loss on early
extinguishment of debt, in our consolidated statement of
operations. In the second quarter of 2005, we purchased an
additional $9.5 million aggregate principal amount of our
7.70% notes due 2009, and $0.3 million aggregate
principal amount of our 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open
market. Also in the second quarter of 2005, we redeemed
$130.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.875% notes due 2007 and $139.3 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.20% notes due 2006 pursuant to a
tender offer for such notes. These transactions resulted in a
recognized loss of $13.1 million recorded in Loss on
early extinguishment of debt. Loss on early extinguishment of
debt for 2005 is comprised of the redemption premiums paid
of $12.2 million and the write-off of unamortized debt
issuance costs of $2.1 million. In the fourth quarter of
2005, we redeemed $5.1 million aggregate principal amount
of our debentures associated with the acquisitions of various
locations. These transactions resulted in no recognized gain or
loss.
On December 15, 2005, as required by the terms of the
agreement, we repaid the remaining $63.5 million of the
6.00% notes due 2005.
On April 15, 2004, as required by the terms of the
agreement, we repaid the remaining $111.2 million of the
7.375% notes due 2004.
On April 22, 2004, we extinguished $200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005,
pursuant to the Offer to Purchase, dated March 24, 2004. We
paid $214.2 million to the tendering holders, including a
premium and accrued interest. As a result of the transaction, we
recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$10.8 million, recorded in Loss on early extinguishment
of debt, in our consolidated statement of operations. In
early May 2004, we also purchased $8.7 million aggregate
principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open
market. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a loss
of $0.3 million recorded in (Loss) gain on early
extinguishment of debt, in our consolidated statement of
operations.
The holders of $221.6 million of our 6.75% convertible
subordinated notes due 2008 converted their holdings to equity
on June 22, 2004, pursuant to the terms of the notes. We
paid $7.5 million in accrued interest to the holders.
Simultaneously, we exercised our option by redeeming the
remaining outstanding $91.1 million of the notes. We paid a
total of $97.6 million, including interest and premiums, to
the holders of the redeemed notes and recognized a
84
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$5.6 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt,
recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt,
in our consolidated statement of operations.
Capital
Leases
In 2006, we acquired $126.4 million of transportation
equipment using capital leases, of which $102.3 million was
classified as operating leases in prior periods. See additional
information regarding these leases in Note 15 of these
consolidated financial statements.
Additional
Debt Disclosures
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had deposited
$10.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively, in
restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as
collateral for various credit instruments and commercial
commitments. This restricted cash is included in Deferred
charges and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
Unamortized pricing discounts, totaling $4.2 million and
$14.6 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, primarily relate to our September 2002 exchange
offering of the 7.7% notes due in 2009.
We had assets of approximately $6.9 million and
$12.7 million pledged as collateral for the mortgage notes
and other debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cash interest payments for the three years ended
December 31 were, in thousands, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
104,789
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
95,678
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
112,399
|
|
Cash interest payments in 2006 include $6.4 million of
bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition.
Cash interest payments forecasted as of December 31, 2006
for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2006 are, in
thousands, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
141,069
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
139,609
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
127,513
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
112,522
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
112,973
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
549,653
|
|
We occasionally participate in hedging activities using a
variety of derivative instruments, including interest rate swap
agreements, cross-currency swap agreements, and forward exchange
contracts. These instruments are used to hedge exposure to risk
in the interest rate and foreign exchange rate markets. We have
documented policies and procedures to monitor and control the
use of derivative transactions, which may only be executed with
a limited group of creditworthy financial institutions. We do
not engage in derivative transactions for speculative or trading
purposes, nor are we a party to leveraged derivatives.
During the third quarter of 2005, we hedged an 8.2 billion
Chilean pesos (CLP) income tax receivable at a forward price of
541 on June 30, 2006. At December 31, 2005, we
marked-to-market
the income tax receivable and the hedge liability at the spot
rate of 514.14. For additional information regarding this
matter, see Note 21 to these consolidated financial
statements.
85
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the first quarter of 2004, we executed certain forward
exchange contracts, having an aggregate notional value of EUR
0.2 million and a corresponding notional value of
$300.0 million, to hedge our net foreign investment in
France. Upon receipt of the net proceeds from the transaction,
we settled these derivative instruments and recorded a gain of
$8.9 million in Other comprehensive income (loss) in
the consolidated statement of stockholders equity, which
was then recognized pursuant to the sale of our operations in
France in Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment
charges, net, in the consolidated statement of operations.
We also executed certain forward exchange contracts during the
first half of 2004, having an aggregate notional value of GBP
22.4 million and a corresponding notional value of
$41.3 million, relating to the ultimate sale of our
minority investment in and the repayment of our note receivable
from a funeral and cemetery company in the United Kingdom. On
April 8, 2004, we received the expected proceeds and
settled these derivative instruments, recognizing a gain of
$0.2 million, which was recorded in Other income, net
in the consolidated statement of operations during the year
ended December 31, 2004.
We were not a party to any derivative instruments at
December 31, 2006.
|
|
14.
|
Credit
Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Fair
Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables
approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the
short-term nature of the instruments. The fair values of
receivables on preneed funeral contracts and cemetery contracts
are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading
market and the diverse number of individual contracts with
varying terms. The carrying value of other notes receivable
approximates the fair value. At December 31, 2006 and 2005,
notes receivable included in Receivables, net totaled
$6.1 million and $16.1 million, respectively, and
those included in Deferred charges and other assets in
the consolidated balance sheet totaled $28.0 million and
$21.6 million, respectively.
86
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of our debt at December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
7.2% notes due 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,698
|
|
6.875% notes due 2007
|
|
|
13,571
|
|
|
|
13,632
|
|
6.5% notes due 2008
|
|
|
195,975
|
|
|
|
198,412
|
|
7.7% notes due 2009
|
|
|
210,185
|
|
|
|
360,852
|
|
7.875% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
58,408
|
|
|
|
58,965
|
|
7.375% senior notes due 2014
|
|
|
260,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75% notes due 2016
|
|
|
248,438
|
|
|
|
246,250
|
|
7.0% notes due 2017
|
|
|
302,625
|
|
|
|
301,500
|
|
7.625% senior notes due 2018
|
|
|
263,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate series A and series
B senior notes
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
113,484
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities
through 2013, fixed interest rates from 4.75% to 5.25%,
conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
|
|
22,102
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt,
maturities through 2050
|
|
|
26,304
|
|
|
|
29,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of debt
|
|
$
|
2,002,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,253,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of our long-term, fixed rate and convertible
debt securities were estimated using market conditions for those
securities or for other securities having similar terms and
maturities. Mortgage notes and other debt have been reported at
face value because of the diverse terms and conditions and
non-trading nature of these notes.
Credit
Risk Exposure
Our cash deposits, some of which exceed insured limits, are
distributed among various market and national banks in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, we regularly
invest excess cash in financial instruments which are not
insured, such as money-market funds and Eurodollar time
deposits, that are offered by a variety of reputable financial
institutions and commercial paper that is offered by
corporations with quality credit ratings. We believe that the
credit risk associated with such instruments is minimal.
We grant credit to customers in the normal course of business.
The credit risk associated with funeral, cemetery and preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery receivables due from customers is
generally considered minimal because of the diversification of
the customers served. Furthermore, bad debts have not been
significant relative to the volume of deferred revenues.
Customer payments on preneed funeral or preneed cemetery
contracts that are either placed into state regulated trusts or
used to pay premiums on life insurance contracts generally do
not subject us to collection risk. Insurance funded contracts
are subject to supervision by state insurance departments and
are protected in the majority of states by insurance guaranty
acts.
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
Our leases principally relate to funeral home facilities and
transportation equipment. The majority of our lease arrangements
contain options to (i) purchase the property at fair value
on the exercise date, (ii) purchase the property for a
value determined at the inception of the leases, or
(iii) renew for the fair rental value at the end of the
primary
87
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
lease term. Rental expense for these leases was
$24.5 million, $54.2 million, and $67.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006, future minimum lease
payments for non-cancelable operating and capital leases
exceeding one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
12,211
|
|
|
$
|
28,124
|
|
2008
|
|
|
11,354
|
|
|
|
23,532
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
|
|
18,725
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
39,920
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,755
|
|
|
|
6,844
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
62,948
|
|
|
|
33,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
114,022
|
|
|
|
150,754
|
|
Less: Subleases
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
112,926
|
|
|
$
|
150,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital
leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to eliminate the variable interest rate risk in our
operating margins and to improve the transparency of our
financial statements, we amended certain of our transportation
lease agreements in the first quarter of 2006. Based on the
amended terms, these leases are classified as capital leases
beginning in the first quarter of 2006 and are presented as such
in the table above.
Management,
Consulting and Non-Competition Agreements
We have entered into management, employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements, generally for five to ten years,
with certain officers and employees and former owners of
businesses that we acquired. At December 31, 2006, the
maximum estimated future cash commitment under agreements with
remaining commitment terms was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
|
Non-Competition
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
2,309
|
|
|
$
|
2,262
|
|
|
$
|
12,371
|
|
|
$
|
16,942
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
5,274
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
2009
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
2010
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
2011
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,564
|
|
|
$
|
5,834
|
|
|
$
|
25,388
|
|
|
$
|
35,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representations
and Warranties
As of December 31, 2006, we have contingent obligations of
$35.4 million resulting from our previous international
asset sales and joint venture transactions. In some cases, we
have agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
made in such disposition transactions with letters of credit or
interest-bearing cash investments. We have interest-bearing cash
investments of $9.0 million included in Deferred charges
and other assets collateralizing certain of these contingent
obligations. We believe it is remote that it will ultimately be
88
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
required to fund to third parties claims against these
representations and warranties above the carrying value of the
liability.
In March 2004, we disposed of our funeral operations in France
to a newly formed, third party company. As a result of this
sale, we recognized $35.8 million of contractual
obligations related to representations, warranties, and other
indemnifications in accordance with the provisions of
FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. During 2006, we paid
$0.4 million to settle certain tax and litigation matters.
The remaining obligation of $23.8 million at
December 31, 2006 represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Future
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Time Limit
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tax reserve liability
|
|
$
|
18,610
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
30 million
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Litigation provision
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
Until entire resolution of
(i) the relevant claims or (ii) settlement of the
claim by the purchaser at the request of the vendor
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
4,358
|
|
Employee litigation provision
|
|
|
6,512
|
|
|
One month after expiration of the
statutory period of limitations
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
6,512
|
|
VAT taxes
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
One month after expiration of the
statutory period of limitations
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
Until entire resolution of
(i) the relevant claims or (ii) settlement of the
claim by the purchaser at the request of the vendor
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority
equity owner
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
20.0 million or $26.4 million at
December 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
40.0 million or $52.8 million at
December 31, 2006. |
Litigation
We are a party to various litigation matters, investigations and
proceedings. For each of our outstanding legal matters, we
evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome. We intend to defend ourselves in the
lawsuits described herein; however, if we determine that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated,
we establish the necessary
89
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accruals. We hold certain insurance policies that may reduce
cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of certain of
these litigation matters. We accrue such insurance recoveries
when they become probable of being paid and can be reasonably
estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The
2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and
consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
of three lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et al; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; Cause
No. 04-CV-20114;
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and
several of SCIs current and former executive officers or
directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class
action alleging that the defendants failed to disclose the
unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites at two
cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida.
Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no discovery has
occurred, and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any,
for the payment of damages.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls and Roberto Valls, on behalf of
themselves and all other similarly situated v. SCI Funeral
Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler
Memorial Park, John Does and Jane Does; Case
No. 23693CA08; In the Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida
(Valls Lawsuit). The Valls Lawsuit was filed
December 5, 2005, and named a subsidiary of SCI as a
defendant. An amended complaint was filed on May 31, 2006.
Plaintiffs have requested that the court certify this matter as
a class action. The plaintiffs allege the defendants improperly
handled remains, did not keep adequate records of interments,
and engaged in various other improprieties in connection with
the operation of the cemetery. Although the plaintiffs seek to
certify as a class all family members of persons buried at the
cemetery, the court dismissed plaintiffs class action
allegations; however, the dismissal is without prejudice to
plaintiffs right to attempt to replead such claims. The
plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and have reserved the
right to seek leave from the court to claim punitive damages.
The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief. Since the
action is in its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify our
ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of any damages. We
have also met with representatives of other families who may
pursue burial practices claims related to this cemetery.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI
Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation
International; In the County Court of El Paso, County,
Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number
2002-740,
with an interlocutory appeal pending in the El Paso Court
of Appeals,
No. 08-05-00182-CV,
and a mandamus proceeding pending in the Texas Supreme Court,
No. 06-0385
(collectively, the Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit
involves a state-wide class action brought on behalf of all
persons, entities and organizations who purchased funeral
services from SCI or its subsidiaries in Texas at any time since
March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas
funeral related regulations
and/or
statutes (Rules) required SCI to disclose its
markups on all items obtained from third parties in connection
with funeral service contracts and that the failure to make
certain disclosures of markups resulted in breach of contract
and other legal claims. The Plaintiffs seek to recover an
unspecified amount of monetary damages. The plaintiffs also seek
attorneys fees, costs of court, pre- and post-judgment
interest, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. SCI denies that the plaintiffs have standing to
sue for violations of the Texas Occupations Code or the Rules,
denies that plaintiffs have standing to sue for violations under
the relevant regulations and statutes, denies that any breaches
of contractual terms occurred, and on other grounds denies
liability on all of the plaintiffs claims. SCI denies that
the Hijar Lawsuit satisfies the requirements for class
certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgment
cross-motions filed by SCI and Plaintiff Hijar (at that time,
the only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars motion
for partial summary judgment and denied SCIs
90
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
motion. In its partial summary judgment order, the trial court
made certain findings to govern the case, consistent with its
summary judgment ruling. SCIs request for rehearing was
denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties have
disputed the proper scope and substance of discovery. Following
briefing by both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial
court entered three orders against SCI that are the subject of
appellate review: (a) a January 2005 discovery sanctions
order; (b) an April 2005 discovery sanctions order; and
(c) an April 2005 certification order, certifying a class
and two subclasses. On April 29, 2005, SCI filed an appeal
regarding the certification order and, concurrently with its
initial brief in that appeal, filed a separate mandamus
proceeding regarding the sanctions orders.
In the certification appeal the court of appeals heard oral
arguments on April 4, 2006. On July 27, 2006, the
court of appeals issued an opinion holding that the plaintiffs
do not have a private right of action for monetary damages under
the relevant regulations and statutes. The opinion concludes
that the plaintiffs do not have standing to assert their claims
for monetary damages on behalf of themselves or the class. The
court of appeals therefore reversed the trial courts order
certifying a class, rendered judgment against the plaintiffs on
their claims for damages, and remanded the remaining general
individual claims for injunctive relief back to the trial court
(without opining on the merits of those claims) for further
handling consistent with the courts opinion. Plaintiffs
filed a motion for rehearing on August 11, 2006. On
January 11, 2007, in response to the motion, the court of
appeals issued a substitute opinion in which the court revised a
portion of its discussion but reached the same result (i.e.,
reversing and rendering against the plaintiffs on their damages
claims, and remanding for consideration of the remaining claims
for injunctive relief).
In the mandamus proceeding, the court of appeals denied the
mandamus petition in January 2006, and denied rehearing on
March 15, 2006. SCI filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in the Supreme Court of Texas, which on September 11, 2006
requested full briefing on the merits. SCI filed its brief on
the merits on November 10, 2006; plaintiffs filed their
brief on the merits on November 30, 2006; and SCI filed its
reply on the merits on December 15, 2006.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; the plaintiffs counsel in
the Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar
issues in California and filed in November 2004 a case styled
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; in Los Angeles County Superior
Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The
Baudino Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar
lawsuit. However, the Baudino Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class
of plaintiffs. On September 15, 2006, the trial court
granted the Companys motion for summary judgment on the
merits of plaintiffs claims. Plaintiffs are appealing the
summary judgment ruling.
Richard Sanchez et al v Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al was filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court
of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District; Case No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who
purchased funeral goods and services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs
allege in essence that the Federal Trade Commissions
Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods to disclose its markups on all
items obtained from third-parties in connection with funeral
service contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that Alderwoods has
failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an
unspecified amount of monetary damages, attorneys fees,
costs and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. This case is substantially similar to the Baudino
Lawsuit, and we expect that the outcome of this case will be
governed by the law applied in the Baudino Lawsuit.
SCI and Alderwoods are defendants in two related class action
antitrust cases filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No
4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v.
Service Corporation International, et al; In the United
States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas Houston (Funeral Consumers Case).
This is a purported class action on behalf of casket consumers
throughout the United States alleging that the Company and
several other companies involved in the funeral industry
violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws by
engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with the
sale of caskets.
91
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
SCI and Alderwoods also are defendants in Cause
No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service
Corporation International, et al.; In the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Houston Division (Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit
makes the same allegations as the Funeral Consumers Case and is
also brought against several other companies involved in the
funeral industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer
Case is a purported class action on behalf of all independent
casket distributors that are in the business or were in the
business any time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek
injunctions, unspecified amounts of monetary damages and treble
damages. Since the litigation is in its preliminary stages, we
cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment
of damages.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley
Case, we received Civil Investigative Demands, dated August 2005
and February 2006, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have
commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive practices
in the funeral industry. We have also received similar Civil
Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and
Connecticut.
Reyvis Garcia and Alicia Garcia v. Alderwoods Group,
Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc, a Florida corporation,
d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial
Gardens, Inc., was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit
Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade
County, Florida, Case No.:
04-25646 CA
32. Plaintiffs are the son and sister of the decedent, Eloisa
Garcia, who was buried at Graceland Memorial Park South in March
1986, when the cemetery was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens,
Inc. Initially, the suit sought damages on the individual claims
of the Plaintiffs relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia.
Plaintiffs claimed that due to poor record keeping, spacing
issues and maps, and the fact that the family could not afford
to purchase a marker for the grave, the burial location of the
decedent could not be located. In July 2006, Plaintiffs amended
their complaint, seeking to certify a class of all persons
buried at this cemetery whose burial sites cannot be located,
claiming that this is due to poor record keeping, maps and
surveys at the cemetery. The Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified
monetary damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. No
class has been certified in this matter. Since the action is in
its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify our ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service
Corporation International; Cause
No. 06-164;
In the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania (the Wage and Hour Lawsuit). The Wage
and Hour Lawsuit was filed by two former Alderwoods
(Pennsylvania), Inc., employees in December 2006 and purports to
have been brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) on behalf of all Alderwoods and SCI
affiliated employees who performed work for which they were not
fully compensated, including work for which overtime pay was
owed. The Court has not yet ruled on the issue of class
certification.
Plaintiffs allege causes of action for violations of the FLSA,
failure to maintain proper records, breach of contract,
violations of state wage and hour laws, unjust enrichment, fraud
and deceit, quantum meruit, negligent misrepresentation, and
negligence. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, unpaid wages,
liquidated, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages,
attorneys fees and costs, and pre- and post-judgment
interest. The Wage and Hour Lawsuit is in its preliminary
stages, no discovery has occurred, and we cannot quantify our
ultimate liability, if any.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be
determined at this time. We intend to aggressively defend all of
the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or more
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on SCI, its
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
92
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Stockholders
Equity
(All shares reported in whole numbers)
|
Share
Authorization
We are authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $1 per share par value. No preferred shares were
issued as of December 31, 2006 or 2005. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, 500,000,000 common shares of
$1 par value were authorized. We had 293,222,114 and
294,808,872 shares issued and outstanding, net of 10,000
and 48,962,063 shares held in treasury at par at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Share
Purchase Rights Plan
Our preferred share purchase rights plan declares a dividend of
one preferred share purchase right for each share of common
stock outstanding. The rights are exercisable in the event
certain investors attempt to acquire 20% or more of our common
stock and entitle the rights holders to purchase certain of our
securities or the securities of the acquiring company. The
rights, which are redeemable by us for $.01 per right,
expire in July 2008 unless extended.
93
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Our components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
(78,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(114,749
|
)
|
Activity in 2004
|
|
|
(9,242
|
)
|
|
|
36,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,394
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains
associated with
available-for-sale
securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,370
|
)
|
|
|
(9,370
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized
gains activity attributable to the non-controlling interest
holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,370
|
|
|
|
9,370
|
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustment realized in net income
|
|
|
49,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(38,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,349
|
)
|
Activity in 2005
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains
associated with
available-for-sale
securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,226
|
)
|
|
|
(69,226
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized
gains activity attributable to the non-controlling interest
holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,226
|
|
|
|
69,226
|
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
70,499
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in 2006
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
Adjustment upon initial adoption
of FAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains
associated with
available-for-sale
securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized
gains activity attributable to the non-controlling interest
holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
Reclassification for translation
adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
76,652
|
|
|
$
|
(623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reclassification adjustment of $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 primarily relates to the sale
of our operations in Singapore. The $3.7 million unrealized
loss on investment securities is related to investment
securities held by a consolidated subsidiary. The
reclassification adjustment of $101.6 million during the
year ended December 31, 2005 includes $71.8 million
related to the sale of our operations in Argentina and Uruguay
and $29.8 million related to the sale of our cemetery
businesses in Chile. The reclassification adjustment
94
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of $49.0 million during the year ended December 31,
2004 relates to the sale of our interest in our French
operations and includes an associated deferred tax asset of
$59.7 million.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate. The
U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as
well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a
long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative
currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income. Income taxes are generally not
provided for foreign currency translation.
The minimum pension liability adjustment for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $36.6 million is net of deferred
taxes of $22.2 million.
Share
Repurchase Program
Subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions, we
may make purchases in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions under our share repurchase program.
During 2006, we repurchased 3.4 million shares of common
stock at an aggregate cost of $27.9 million. During 2005,
we repurchased 31 million shares of common stock at an
aggregate cost of $225.2 million. During 2004, we
repurchased 16.7 million shares of common stock at an
aggregate cost of $110.3 million. The remaining dollar
value of shares authorized to be purchased under the share
repurchase program was $36.0 million at December 31,
2006. In February 2007, our Board of Directors approved an
increase in our share repurchase program authorizing the
investment of up to an additional $164 million to
repurchase our common stock bringing the total to
$200 million.
Cash
Dividends
On November 8, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a cash
dividend of $.03 per common share. At December 31,
2006, this dividend totaling $8.8 million was recorded in
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and Capital
in Excess of Par Value in the consolidated balance sheet.
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, this dividend was paid. We
paid $29.4 million and $22.6 million in cash dividends
in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
We have a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan
covering approximately 34% of United States employees (US
Pension Plan), a supplemental retirement plan for certain
current and former key employees (SERP), a supplemental
retirement plan for officers and certain key employees (Senior
SERP), a retirement plan for certain non-employee directors
(Directors Plan), the Employees Retirement Plan of Rose
Hills, the Retirement Plan for Rose Hills Trustees, and the Rose
Hills Supplemental Retirement Plan (collectively, the
Plans). We also provide a 401(k) employee savings
plan.
In connection with the Alderwoods acquisition, we assumed
$20.2 million of pension benefit obligation and
$10.7 million in plan assets at December 31, 2006.
Effective January 1, 2001, we curtailed our US Pension
Plan, SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan. Additionally,
the plans assumed in connection with the Alderwoods acquisition
are frozen. As the Plans have been frozen, the participants do
not earn incremental benefits from additional years of service
and we do not incur new service cost after December 31,
2000.
Retirement benefits for the US Pension Plan are an actuarially
determined amount, generally based on years of service and
compensation. Assets of the pension plan currently consist of
cash and cash equivalents, fixed income investments, and
marketable equity securities, which complies with the funding
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974.
Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service
and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under the
US Pension Plan and Social Security. The Senior SERP provides
retirement benefits based on
95
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
years of service and position. The Directors Plan provides
for an annual benefit to directors following retirement, based
on a vesting schedule.
The components of the Plans net periodic benefit cost for
the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
$
|
8,111
|
|
|
$
|
9,160
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,829
|
)
|
|
|
(7,226
|
)
|
|
|
(10,690
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement/curtailment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
$
|
9,192
|
|
|
$
|
59,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Plans funded status at December 31 was as follows
(based on valuations as of September 30):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Change in Benefit
Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
137,252
|
|
|
$
|
139,742
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
20,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
2,644
|
|
|
|
7,701
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(17,303
|
)
|
|
|
(18,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
|
$
|
137,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
80,803
|
|
|
$
|
88,550
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
10,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
7,226
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
Benefits paid, including expenses
|
|
|
(17,620
|
)
|
|
|
(18,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
|
$
|
80,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plan
|
|
$
|
(65,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,449
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Adoption of SFAS 158
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$
|
(64,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
|
$
|
137,252
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
|
$
|
137,252
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
|
$
|
80,803
|
|
Amounts recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(65,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,449
|
)
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$
|
(64,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The retirement benefits under the SERP, Senior SERP,
Directors Plan, the Rose Hills Trustee Plan, and the Rose
Hills SERP Plan are unfunded obligations of the Company. As of
December 31, 2006, the benefit obligation of the SERP,
Senior SERP and Directors Plan (excluding the Rose Hills
SERP) is $29.0 million; however, we have purchased various
life insurance policies on the participants in the Senior SERP
with the intent to use the proceeds or any cash value buildup
from such policies to assist in meeting, at least to the extent
of such assets, the plans funding requirements. The face
value of these insurance policies was $55.7 million and the
cash surrender value was $38.7 million as of
December 31, 2006. No loans are outstanding against the
policies, but there are no restrictions in the policies
regarding loans.
Due to our change in accounting for gains and losses on pension
plan assets and obligations effective January 1, 2004, the
change in minimum liability included in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss was a decrease of
97
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$59.8 million in 2004. We recorded net pension (expense)
income of $(3.6) million, $(9.2) million, and
$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Plans weighted-average assumptions used to determine
the benefit obligation and net benefit cost were as follows: We
base our discount rate used to compute future benefit
obligations using an analysis of expected future benefit
payments. The reasonableness of our discount rate is verified by
comparing the rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed
income investments, such as the Moodys Aa index, on
high-quality fixed income investments plus 50 basis points.
Weighted-average discount rates used to determine pension
obligations for the Plans were 5.55%, 5.75%, and 6.00% for the
years ended 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The assumed rate
of return on plan assets was not applicable as we recognize
gains and losses on plan assets during the year in which they
occur. As all Plans are curtailed, the assumed rate of
compensation increase is zero. In March 2004, we voluntarily
contributed $20 million to the frozen U.S. Pension
Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Discount rate used to determine
obligations
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Assumed rate of return on plan
assets
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Discount rate used to determine
net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
The Plans weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Core diversified and
market-neutral hedge funds
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Fixed income investments
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Equity securities(1)
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity securities do not include shares of our common stock at
December 31, 2006 or 2005. |
The primary investment objective of the SCI Cash Balance Plan is
to liquidate all plan assets by early 2007 as we have begun the
process to terminate this Plan and expect to finish this
termination by mid-2007. The other plans have a measurement date
of December 31.
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid (assuming
no plan terminations):
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
$
|
14,659
|
|
2008
|
|
|
14,336
|
|
2009
|
|
|
13,951
|
|
2010
|
|
|
14,730
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,634
|
|
Years 2012 through 2016
|
|
|
58,710
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the $14.7 million expected benefit payments for
2007 is $3.1 million we expect to contribute for the SERP,
Senior SERP, Directors Plan, Rose Hills Retirement Plan
for Trustees, and Rose Hills SERP expected benefit payments. |
Effective January 1, 2004, we changed our method of
accounting for gains and losses on our pension plan assets and
obligations. Pursuant to this new accounting method, we
recognize pension related gains and losses in our consolidated
statement of operations in the year such gains and losses are
incurred. Prior to January 1, 2004, we amortized the
difference between actual and expected investment returns and
actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the
extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). We believe this change in
98
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accounting is preferable as the new method of accounting better
reflects the economic nature of our Plans and recognizes gains
and losses on the Plan assets and obligations in the year the
gains and losses occur. As a result of this accounting change,
we recognized a cumulative effect charge of an accounting change
of $36.6 million, net of tax of $23.2 million, as of
January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated
unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and
obligations.
On December 31, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement
No. 158 Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. The
objective of the Statement is to improve financial reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize the funded status of a
benefit plan measured as the difference between plan
assets at fair value and the projected benefit
obligation in its statement of financial position.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize as a component
of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains and losses
and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period
which were not recognized as components of net periodic benefit
costs pursuant to FASB Statement No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, or No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension.
The Statement calls for measuring the defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end statement of financial position. The requirement
to change the measurement date is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008. The SCI Cash Balance Plan
currently has a measurement date of September 30, and we do
not anticipate changing this measurement date as we are
liquidating all plan assets in early 2007 for distribution to
all Cash Balance Plan participants by mid-year 2007. All other
plans have a measurement date of December 31.
The unfunded status of the pension plan had been recognized as a
non-current liability prior to the adoption of SFAS 158. At
year end December 31, 2006 and 2005, the unfunded status
was $(65.0) million and $(56.0) million, respectively.
Accumulated other comprehensive income has $0.6 million of
prior service cost.
We have an employee savings plan that qualifies under
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the
exclusive benefit of our United States employees. Under the
plan, participating employees may contribute a portion of their
pretax
and/or after
tax income in accordance with specified guidelines up to a
maximum of 50%. During 2006 and 2005, we matched a percentage of
the employee contributions through contributions of cash. During
2004, we matched employee contributions through contributions of
our common stock. For each of the three years, our matching
contribution was based upon the following:
|
|
|
Years of Vesting Service
|
|
Percentage of Deferred Compensation
|
|
0 - 5 years
|
|
75% of the first 6% of deferred
compensation
|
6 - 10 years
|
|
110% of the first 6% of deferred
compensation
|
11 or more years
|
|
135% of the first 6% of deferred
compensation
|
The amount of our matched contributions in 2006, 2005, and 2004
was $16.8 million, $16.5 million and
$18.1 million, respectively.
Our operations are both product based and geographically based,
and the reportable operating segments presented below include
our funeral and cemetery operations. Our geographic areas
include United States and Foreign.
Alderwoods operating results have been included since
November 28, 2006 and have not been included as a pro forma
adjustment to other periods. Please refer to Note 5 for pro
forma presentations related to the Alderwoods acquisition.
In 2006 and 2005, Foreign operations consists of our operations
in Canada and Germany. In 2004, Foreign also included operations
in France, which were disposed of in the first quarter of 2004.
Results from our funeral and
99
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cemetery businesses in Argentina and Uruguay, which were sold in
the first quarter of 2005, our cemetery business in Chile, which
was sold in the third quarter of 2005, and our funeral business
in Singapore, which was sold in the fourth quarter of 2006, are
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
We conduct both funeral and cemetery operations in the United
States and Canada and funeral operations in other Foreign
geographic areas.
Our reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,156,169
|
|
|
$
|
591,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,384
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69,036
|
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
|
87,073
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
236,369
|
|
|
|
108,298
|
|
|
|
344,668
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,505,437
|
|
|
|
4,575,424
|
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38,031
|
|
|
|
53,506
|
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,150,597
|
|
|
$
|
560,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,529
|
|
|
|
17,828
|
|
|
|
67,357
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
215,091
|
|
|
|
81,921
|
|
|
|
297,012
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,360,546
|
|
|
|
3,600,473
|
|
|
|
6,961,019
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
48,153
|
|
|
|
46,756
|
|
|
|
94,909
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,254,339
|
|
|
$
|
571,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58,835
|
|
|
|
66,498
|
|
|
|
125,333
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
226,145
|
|
|
|
102,202
|
|
|
|
328,347
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,183
|
|
|
|
30,183
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,521,512
|
|
|
|
4,219,900
|
|
|
|
7,741,412
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
36,155
|
|
|
|
40,180
|
|
|
|
76,335
|
|
100
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles certain reportable segment
amounts to our corresponding consolidated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
|
|
114,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,073
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
|
|
275,160
|
|
|
|
373,368
|
|
|
|
9,729,389
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
|
|
4,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,527
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
|
|
98,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,733
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
67,357
|
|
|
|
7,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,961,019
|
|
|
|
583,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,544,769
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
94,909
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,605
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
113,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,293
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
125,333
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,431
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,741,412
|
|
|
|
470,290
|
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
8,227,154
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
76,335
|
|
|
|
19,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,619
|
|
The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable
segments shown above to our consolidated income from continuing
operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of
accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from reportable
segments
|
|
$
|
344,668
|
|
|
$
|
297,012
|
|
|
$
|
328,347
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(94,900
|
)
|
|
|
(84,834
|
)
|
|
|
(130,884
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
|
|
25,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
191,085
|
|
|
|
186,085
|
|
|
|
223,260
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
|
|
(103,733
|
)
|
|
|
(119,293
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
|
|
13,453
|
|
(Loss) on early extinguishment of
debt
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
|
|
(14,258
|
)
|
|
|
(16,770
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
$
|
87,127
|
|
|
$
|
109,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our geographic area information was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,625,087
|
|
|
$
|
122,208
|
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
123,112
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
88,908
|
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
25,829
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
173,350
|
|
|
|
17,735
|
|
|
|
191,085
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(56,710
|
)
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
5,043,144
|
|
|
$
|
514,718
|
|
|
$
|
5,557,862
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,596,389
|
|
|
$
|
114,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
103,650
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
103,733
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69,791
|
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
24,167
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
161,753
|
|
|
|
24,332
|
|
|
|
186,085
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(27,597
|
)
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,433,506
|
|
|
$
|
245,791
|
|
|
$
|
3,679,297
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,583,979
|
|
|
$
|
241,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
119,160
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
119,293
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
128,806
|
|
|
|
4,625
|
|
|
|
133,431
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
25,775
|
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
30,183
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
184,177
|
|
|
|
39,083
|
|
|
|
223,260
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
24,625
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
25,797
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,951,856
|
|
|
$
|
337,483
|
|
|
$
|
4,289,339
|
|
102
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Supplementary
Information
|
The detail of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
14,883
|
|
|
$
|
5,594
|
|
Commercial paper and temporary
investments
|
|
|
24,997
|
|
|
|
441,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
$
|
446,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
|
$
|
16,099
|
|
Atneed funeral receivables, net
|
|
|
82,450
|
|
|
|
66,884
|
|
Atneed cemetery receivables, net
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
|
2,949
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
11,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
107,194
|
|
|
$
|
97,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset and income tax
receivable
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
18,499
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
Other
|
|
|
30,423
|
|
|
|
15,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,162
|
|
|
$
|
37,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
$
|
1,136,334
|
|
|
$
|
1,107,259
|
|
Developed land, lawn crypts and
mausoleums
|
|
|
358,914
|
|
|
|
285,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,495,248
|
|
|
$
|
1,392,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
516,256
|
|
|
$
|
289,800
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1,337,286
|
|
|
|
1,009,453
|
|
Operating equipment
|
|
|
414,670
|
|
|
|
262,348
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
24,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294,705
|
|
|
|
1,586,228
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(653,352
|
)
|
|
|
(636,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,641,353
|
|
|
$
|
950,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
covenants-not-to-compete,
net
|
|
$
|
68,850
|
|
|
$
|
73,240
|
|
Investments, net
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
Preneed backlog intangible assets
|
|
|
86,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
79,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
12,056
|
|
Notes receivable, net
|
|
|
28,042
|
|
|
|
21,567
|
|
Cash surrender value of insurance
policies
|
|
|
61,405
|
|
|
|
50,057
|
|
Other
|
|
|
99,529
|
|
|
|
83,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
436,545
|
|
|
$
|
249,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Receivables, net on our consolidated balance
sheet are funeral and cemetery atneed allowances for doubtful
accounts of approximately $25.8 million and
$11.8 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
103
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
75,037
|
|
|
$
|
41,160
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
57,153
|
|
|
|
57,528
|
|
Restructuring liability
|
|
|
7,564
|
|
|
|
7,375
|
|
Accrued dividend
|
|
|
8,788
|
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
25,805
|
|
|
|
17,149
|
|
Self insurance
|
|
|
67,698
|
|
|
|
49,084
|
|
Accrued trust expenses
|
|
|
11,069
|
|
|
|
13,101
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
88,059
|
|
|
|
38,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
341,173
|
|
|
$
|
231,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension
|
|
$
|
65,438
|
|
|
$
|
55,642
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
15,565
|
|
|
|
11,352
|
|
Customer refund obligation reserve
|
|
|
83,951
|
|
|
|
66,118
|
|
Tax liability
|
|
|
104,874
|
|
|
|
104,981
|
|
Indemnification liability
|
|
|
26,364
|
|
|
|
26,750
|
|
Other
|
|
|
61,226
|
|
|
|
62,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
357,418
|
|
|
$
|
326,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenues
and Costs and Expenses
The detail of certain income statement accounts in thousands is
as follows for the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
422,333
|
|
|
$
|
501,794
|
|
|
$
|
505,170
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
391,231
|
|
|
|
380,990
|
|
|
|
388,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goods
|
|
|
813,564
|
|
|
|
882,784
|
|
|
|
893,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
696,459
|
|
|
|
613,430
|
|
|
|
585,854
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
170,523
|
|
|
|
146,035
|
|
|
|
141,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services
|
|
|
866,982
|
|
|
|
759,465
|
|
|
|
727,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America revenues
|
|
|
1,680,546
|
|
|
|
1,642,249
|
|
|
|
1,621,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International revenues
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
7,033
|
|
|
|
135,480
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
60,249
|
|
|
|
61,695
|
|
|
|
68,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,747,295
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,977
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
195,867
|
|
|
$
|
193,650
|
|
|
$
|
190,971
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
161,157
|
|
|
|
158,708
|
|
|
|
162,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods
|
|
|
357,024
|
|
|
|
352,358
|
|
|
|
353,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
349,219
|
|
|
|
371,618
|
|
|
|
351,302
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
93,881
|
|
|
|
96,872
|
|
|
|
99,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
443,100
|
|
|
|
468,490
|
|
|
|
450,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America costs
|
|
|
800,124
|
|
|
|
820,848
|
|
|
|
804,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International costs and expenses
|
|
|
6,084
|
|
|
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
123,905
|
|
Overhead and other expenses
|
|
|
596,419
|
|
|
|
586,408
|
|
|
|
568,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$
|
1,402,627
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,497,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
Non-Cash Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of StoneMor partnership
units received in disposition
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Dividends accrued but not paid
|
|
$
|
8,788
|
|
|
$
|
7,415
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Changes to minimum liability under
retirement plans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(36,636
|
)
|
Debenture conversions to common
stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
217,154
|
|
Common stock contributions to
employee 401(k)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,127
|
|
105
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) excludes dilution
and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other obligations to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings
(losses).
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted EPS for the three years ended December 31 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes basic
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
|
$
|
55,091
|
|
|
$
|
117,421
|
|
After tax interest on convertible
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting changes
diluted
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
|
$
|
55,091
|
|
|
$
|
123,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
110,661
|
|
After tax interest on convertible
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
diluted
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
$
|
117,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
(denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares basic
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
|
|
302,213
|
|
|
|
318,737
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,776
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares diluted
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
306,745
|
|
|
|
344,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
Income per share from discontinued
operations per share, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
$
|
.13
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
changes per share, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(.62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.16
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
The computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share excludes
outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain
periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be
antidilutive in the periods presented. Total
106
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
options and convertible debentures not currently included in the
computation of dilutive earnings (loss) per share for the
respective periods are as follows (in shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Antidilutive options
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
7,039
|
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents
excluded from computations
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Divestiture-Related
Activities
|
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or
losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the
income statement line item Gains (losses) on
dispositions and impairment charges,
net. Additionally, as dispositions occur pursuant
to our ongoing asset sale programs, adjustments are made through
this income statement line item to reflect the difference
between actual proceeds received from the sale compared to the
original estimates.
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
consists of the following for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
$
|
(18,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
68,167
|
|
|
$
|
66,966
|
|
Impairment losses on assets held
for sale
|
|
|
(39,957
|
)
|
|
|
(94,260
|
)
|
|
|
(41,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of Operations in Michigan
In 2006, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest
certain funeral homes and cemeteries in Michigan. As a result,
we recognized a pretax impairment charge of $26.4 million
on these properties.
Sale
of Operations in Singapore
In October 2006, we sold our businesses in Singapore for
proceeds of approximately $11.6 million, of which
$1.0 million is due in the second quarter of 2007. We
recognized an after-tax gain of $2.9 million in Income
from discontinued operations in our consolidated statement
of operations as a result of this transaction.
Sale
of Operations in Chile
In September 2005, we completed the sale of our cemetery
operations in Chile for proceeds of approximately
$106 million. We received net cash proceeds of
$90.0 million upon completion of the sale and received
additional cash proceeds of CLP 5.8 billion or
approximately $11.0 million in 2006. We recognized a
pre-tax gain of $0.2 million in Income from discontinued
operations in our 2005 consolidated statement of operations
as a result of this transaction. Included in this gain is a
foreign currency gain of $0.6 million on the expected cash
proceeds. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, we received the
remainder of the proceeds totaling CLP 2.5 billion or
approximately $4.7 million.
Sales
of Assets to StoneMor Partners LP
In September 2006, we sold 21 cemeteries and 14 funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP (StoneMor) for proceeds of approximately
$11.8 million. We received net cash proceeds of
$5.9 million and 275,046 StoneMor units valued at
$5.9 million. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a pre-tax loss of $16.6 million in Gains
107
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net in
our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
In November 2005, we sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral homes to
StoneMor for $12.7 million. In the third quarter of 2005,
we had classified these properties as held for sale and recorded
an impairment charge in Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net in our consolidated statement of
operations of approximately $19.6 million, net of a tax
benefit of $10.5 million in our consolidated statement of
operations. In connection with this sale, we received
$6.8 million in cash and 280,952 StoneMor units, valued at
$5.9 million in November of 2005. The StoneMor units are
recorded at cost in Other current assets in the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005. In 2006,
we disposed of our investment in StoneMor Limited Partners LP
units for $6.0 million, resulting in a pretax gain of
$0.1 million.
Sale
of Argentina and Uruguay Operations
During the second quarter of 2004, we recorded an impairment of
our funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina totaling
$15.2 million in Income from discontinued operations
in our consolidated statement of operations. As a result of
the sale of the Argentina and Uruguay businesses in the first
quarter of 2005, we recorded a gain of $2.0 million in
Income from discontinued operations in the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004 associated with the revised estimated fair value. The new
carrying amount reflected the fair value based on then-current
market conditions less estimated costs to sell. Additionally, we
recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $49.2 million in
discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2004, which
represents the reduction of a previously recorded valuation
allowance. We also recognized an additional tax benefit of
$2.6 million in discontinued operations during the fourth
quarter of 2004, which represents the revised estimated fair
value and differences between book and tax bases. In the first
quarter of 2005, we received proceeds of $21.6 million
related to the sale of our former operations in Argentina and
Uruguay.
Sale
of French Operations
In March 2004, we sold 100% of the stock of our French
subsidiary to a newly formed company (NEWCO). In connection with
this sale, we acquired a 25% share of the voting interest of
NEWCO, received cash proceeds of $281.7 million, net of
transaction costs, and received a note receivable in the amount
of EUR 10.0 million. Also received in this transaction
were EUR 15.0 million of preferred equity certificates
and EUR 6.0 million of convertible preferred equity
certificates. The sale of stock of our French subsidiary in
March 2004 resulted in a pretax gain of $12.6 million and a
non-cash tax benefit of $24.9 million (described below),
resulting in an after tax gain of $37.6 million. We
accounted for the sale of our French subsidiary in accordance
with the guidance set forth in EITF
01-2,
Interpretations of APB Opinion No. 29,
Issues 8(a) and 8(b). Consequently, we deferred approximately
25% of the gain associated with the sale of our French
subsidiary representing the economic interest we obtained in
that subsidiary through our ownership of approximately 25% of
NEWCO.
In July 2004, we paid $6.2 million pursuant to the joint
venture agreement, as a purchase price adjustment, which reduced
the pretax gain to $6.4 million and reduced the after tax
gain to $33.6 million as summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation
|
|
|
Adjustment in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2004
|
|
|
Q2 2004
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
(6,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,420
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(24,929
|
)
|
|
|
(2,275
|
)
|
|
|
(27,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After tax gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
37,568
|
|
|
$
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $24.9 million non-cash tax benefit associated with the
sale of our French subsidiary is primarily attributable to the
reduction of $18.6 million of tax accruals, which were
accrued as an indemnification liability
108
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
upon the sale of our French subsidiary. The remaining amount of
$6.3 million was a non-cash tax benefit associated with the
difference between book and tax bases.
Included in the pretax gain, we recognized $35.8 million of
contractual obligations related to representation and warranties
and other indemnifications resulting from the joint venture
contract. During 2004, $2.4 million in charges were applied
to the indemnification and related primarily to foreign taxes
and legal expenses. We applied $2.1 million to the
indemnifications during 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we
released tax indemnification liabilities of approximately
$7.1 million. For more information regarding these
representations and warranties and other indemnifications, see
Note 15. Also, goodwill in the amount of $23.5 million
was removed from our consolidated balance sheet as a result of
this transaction.
NEWCO completed refinancings in May 2005 and July 2005 in order
to reduce its cost of debt. Included in this refinancing was the
repayment of the note payable to us plus interest and the
redemption of our investment in preferred equity certificates
and convertible preferred equity certificates and associated
interest, which were received in the original disposition. In
the second quarter of 2005, we received $32.1 million
related to the note payable and preferred equity certificates
with associated interest of $3.1 million. In the third
quarter of 2005, we received additional proceeds of
$7.6 million on convertible preferred equity certificates.
Our investment in common stock and 25% voting interest remain
unchanged following this transaction.
Proceeds
from Investment in United Kingdom Company and
Others
During the second quarter of 2004, we received proceeds of
$53.8 million from the sale of our minority interest equity
investment in the United Kingdom and the prepayment of our note
receivable, with accrued interest, following a successful public
offering transaction of our United Kingdom company.
Associated with the disposition, we recognized income of
$41.2 million, recorded in Gains (losses) on
dispositions and impairment charges, net, in the
consolidated statement of operations ($27.2 million to
adjust the carrying amount of the receivable from our former
United Kingdom company to the realizable value and
$14.0 million as a pretax gain as a result of the sale).
This pretax gain was reduced by an accrual for the tax-related
indemnification liabilities of $8.0 million. In addition,
we recognized interest income on the receivable in the amount of
$4.5 million and a foreign currency gain of
$0.2 million recorded in Other income, net in the
consolidated statement of operations and recognized a non-cash
tax benefit of $8.0 million recorded in Gains (losses)
on disposition and impairment charges, net in the
consolidated statement of operations. This pretax gain is
attributable to the reduction of the tax related accrual upon
the release of a contingency, which was accrued as an
indemnification liability in the second quarter of 2004.
Assets
Held for Sale
In connection with the acquisition of Alderwoods, we have agreed
to a consent order with the staff of the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) that identifies certain properties the FTC will
require us to divest as a result of the acquisition. The consent
order has been approved by the FTC commissioners.
In addition, we have committed to a plan to sell certain other
operating properties. As a result, these properties, along with
those expected to be sold as a result of the FTC agreement, have
been classified as assets held for sale in our December 31,
2006 consolidated balance sheet. In connection with this revised
classification, we have recorded an impairment loss of
approximately $40.0 million in our consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
109
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net assets held for sale at December 31, 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
6,330
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
|
56,968
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
|
107,796
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
65,448
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost
(net)
|
|
|
23,829
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
13,914
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust
investments
|
|
|
54,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
355,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
419
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
66,841
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
117,604
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
Non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
54,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
240,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
115,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we disposed of our funeral
operations in Singapore. During the first quarter of 2005, we
disposed of our funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and
Uruguay. During the third quarter of 2005, we also disposed of
our cemetery operations in Chile. Accordingly, the operations in
these countries are classified as discontinued operations for
all periods presented.
As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired an insurance
subsidiary for which we have commenced a plan to divest. The
operations of this subsidiary from November 28, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 are presented as discontinued operations
in our consolidated statement of operations and as assets and
liabilities of discontinued operations on our consolidated
balance sheet.
We fully hedged an income tax receivable denominated in Chilean
pesos; therefore, we have no foreign exchange rate risk
associated with this receivable. The fair market value hedge was
recorded at market value at December 31, 2005. Currency
fluctuations associated with this hedge resulted in a gain of
$0.4 million, net of a tax provision of 0.2 million,
which is included in Income from discontinued operations
in our consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005. This hedge expired June 30,
2006. For more information on this hedge, see Note 13 to
these consolidated financial statements. The provision for
income taxes during 2005 was negatively impacted by differences
between book and tax bases related to the sale of our operations
in Chile. The benefit for income taxes in 2004 includes a
non-cash tax benefit of $49.2 million, which represents the
reduction of
110
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a previously recorded valuation allowance related to the sale of
our operations in Argentina. The results of our discontinued
operations for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
12,324
|
|
|
$
|
27,651
|
|
|
$
|
50,001
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
(13,148
|
)
|
Costs and other expenses
|
|
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
|
(17,433
|
)
|
|
|
(41,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
10,467
|
|
|
|
(4,889
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income
taxes
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
(5,961
|
)
|
|
|
48,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
3,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,506
|
|
|
$
|
43,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, we reported assets and liabilities
related to discontinued operations as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
366,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
373,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
(2,351
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(311,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(313,849
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
59,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Quarterly financial data for 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
440,484
|
|
|
$
|
429,865
|
|
|
$
|
398,920
|
|
|
$
|
478,026
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(353,307
|
)
|
|
|
(347,212
|
)
|
|
|
(327,341
|
)
|
|
|
(374,767
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
87,177
|
|
|
|
82,653
|
|
|
|
71,579
|
|
|
|
103,259
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
60,660
|
|
|
|
58,850
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
51,702
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
|
42,422
|
|
|
|
40,761
|
|
|
|
7,603
|
|
|
|
6,663
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(15,645
|
)
|
|
|
(15,404
|
)
|
|
|
(4,415
|
)
|
|
|
(9,381
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
26,777
|
|
|
|
25,357
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
26,926
|
|
|
|
25,450
|
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
446,253
|
|
|
$
|
430,844
|
|
|
$
|
405,165
|
|
|
$
|
428,715
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(348,894
|
)
|
|
|
(357,947
|
)
|
|
|
(346,490
|
)
|
|
|
(360,634
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
97,359
|
|
|
|
72,897
|
|
|
|
58,675
|
|
|
|
68,081
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
71,911
|
|
|
|
54,940
|
|
|
|
11,485
|
|
|
|
47,749
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
48,641
|
|
|
|
19,505
|
|
|
|
(10,248
|
)
|
|
|
29,229
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income
taxes
|
|
|
(17,516
|
)
|
|
|
(8,851
|
)
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(6,638
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
31,125
|
|
|
|
10,654
|
|
|
|
(9,279
|
)
|
|
|
22,591
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(187,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(154,895
|
)
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
(9,652
|
)
|
|
|
22,769
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
(.49
|
)
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.08
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
(.49
|
)
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.08
|
|
112
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
Three Years Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts(2)
|
|
|
Write-Offs(1)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
11,835
|
|
|
$
|
10,020
|
|
|
$
|
12,060
|
|
|
$
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,793
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(10,168
|
)
|
|
|
11,835
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
15,348
|
|
|
|
(3,376
|
)
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
|
|
(8,157
|
)
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
Due After One Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
7,312
|
|
|
$
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,844
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
33,362
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(25,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
55,029
|
|
|
|
(21,502
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,362
|
|
Preneed Funeral and Preneed
Cemetery Asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
60,358
|
|
|
$
|
(803
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,572
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
53,340
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,358
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
387,150
|
|
|
|
(17,772
|
)
|
|
|
(316,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,340
|
|
Deferred Preneed Funeral and
Cemetery Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
(112,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(151,341
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(112,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,002
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(369,980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,290
|
)
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
34,829
|
|
|
$
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,751
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,547
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
43,908
|
|
|
|
(9,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
35,859
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,908
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollected receivables written off, net of recoveries. |
|
(2) |
|
Primarily relates to cumulative effect of accounting change and
acquisitions and dispositions of operations. |
113
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
periodic Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Disclosure Committee and management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b).
Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, such officers
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria described in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management
concluded that we maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.
Management has excluded Alderwoods from its assessment of
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 because it was acquired by the Company in
a purchase business combination during 2006. The total assets
and total revenues of Alderwoods represent approximately 13% and
3%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial
statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
114
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Information called for by PART III (Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14) has been omitted as we intend to file with
the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of
its fiscal year a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A. Such information is set forth in such Proxy
Statement (i) with respect to Item 10 under the
captions Proxy Voting: Questions and Answers,
Election of Directors, Other
Matters Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance and Report of the Audit
Committee, (ii) with respect to Items 11 and 13
under the captions Election of Directors
Director Compensation, Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, Compensation Committee Report,
Certain Information with Respect to Officers and
Directors, Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation and Certain Transactions
and (iii) with respect to Item 12 under the caption
Voting Securities and Principal Holders:, and
(iv) with respect of Item 14 under the caption
Proposal to Approve the Selection of Independent
Accountants Audit Fees and All Other Fees. The
information as specified in the preceding sentence is
incorporated herein by reference; provided however,
notwithstanding anything set forth in this
Form 10-K,
the information under the captions Compensation Committee
Report and Report of the Audit Committee in
such Proxy Statement, is not incorporated by reference into this
Form 10-K.
The information regarding our executive officers called for by
Item 401 of
Regulation S-K
and the information regarding our code of ethics called for by
Item 406 of
Regulation S-K
has been included in PART I of this report. The information
regarding our equity compensation plan information called for by
Item 201(d) of
Regulation S-K
is set forth below.
Equity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
19,954,413
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
2,615,487
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
2,576,903
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
1,245,178
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,531,316
|
|
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
3,860,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes options outstanding under the Equity Corporation
International 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan which became
exercisable to acquire our common stock when we acquired Equity
Corporation International in January 1999. The outstanding
options cover an aggregate of 109,052 shares at a
weighted-average exercise price of $31.16 per share. No
shares of our common stock are available for any future grants
under this plan. |
|
|
|
Also includes options outstanding under the 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan under which nonqualified stock options were
granted to employees who are not officers or directors. We have
2,467,851 total options outstanding under the 1996 Non-qualified
Incentive Plan. No shares of our common stock are available for
any future grants under this plan. See Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K |
115
|
|
|
|
|
for a further description of 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan.
These plans have not been submitted for shareholder approval. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes an estimated 1,245,178 shares available under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, a dollar value of
shares (not an amount of shares) are registered. The above
estimate was determined by dividing (i) the remaining
unissued dollar value of registered shares at December 31,
2006, which was $12.8 million, by (ii) the closing
price of $10.25 per share of common stock at
December 31, 2006. |
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables Company employees in
North America to invest via payroll deductions up to $500 (or
$700 Canadian) per month in our common stock. Contributions are
utilized to purchase the stock in the open market. With respect
to Canadian employees who meet certain requirements, we will
provide annually a match equal to 25% of the amount of the
employees contribution subject to a maximum contribution
per participant of $2,100 Canadian. This plan has not been
submitted for shareholder approval.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
(a)(1)-(2) Financial Statements and Schedule:
The financial statements and schedule are listed in the
accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Related Schedule
on page 43 of this report.
(3) Exhibits:
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index on
pages 119-121
are filed as part of this report.
(b) Included in (a) above.
(c) Included in (a) above.
116
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, Service
Corporation International, has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(James M. Shelger,
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary)
Dated: February 28, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ R.
L. WALTRIP*
(R.
L. Waltrip)
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
L. RYAN*
(Thomas
L. Ryan)
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERIC
D.
TANZBERGER*
(Eric
D. Tanzberger)
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY
I. BEASON*
(Jeffrey
I. Beason)
|
|
Vice President and Corporate
Controller (Chief Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ALAN
R.
BUCKWALTER, III*
(Alan
R. Buckwalter, III)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ANTHONY
L. COELHO*
(Anthony
L. Coelho)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ A.
J.
FOYT, JR.*
(A.
J. Foyt, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MALCOLM
GILLIS*
(Malcolm
Gillis)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ VICTOR
L. LUND*
(Victor
L. Lund)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ JOHN
W.
MECOM, JR.*
(John
W. Mecom, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CLIFTON
H.
MORRIS, JR.*
(Clifton
H. Morris, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
BLAIR
WALTRIP*
(W.
Blair Waltrip)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ EDWARD
E.
WILLIAMS*
(Edward
E. Williams)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ JAMES
M. SHELGER
(James
M. Shelger, as Attorney-In-Fact For each of the Persons
indicated)
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
118
EXHIBIT INDEX
PURSUANT TO ITEM 601 OF REG. S-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated April 2, 2006, by and among Service Corporation
International, Coronado Acquisition Corporation and Alderwoods
Group, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
Form 8-K
dated April 5, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Articles of
Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Registration Statement
No. 333-10867
on
Form S-3).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated
Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1996).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Statement of Resolution
Establishing Series of Shares of Series D Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, dated July 27, 1998.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1998).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Bylaws, as amended. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
May 14, 1998 between the Company and Harris Trust and
Savings Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Form 8-K
dated May 14, 1998).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Agreement Appointing a Successor
Rights Agent Under Rights Agreement, dated June 1, 1999, by
the Company, Harris Trust and Savings Bank and The Bank of New
York. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1999).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Senior Indenture dated as of
February 1, 1993 by and between the Company and The Bank of
New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference as
Exhibit 4.1 to
Form S-4
filed September 2, 2004 (File
No. 333-118763)).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation,
Appointment of Acceptance, dated October 21, 2005, among
the Company, The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A., appointing a successor trustee for the Senior
Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan For Non-Employee
Directors. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Retirement Plan
For Non-Employee Directors. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated May 14, 1992
between the Company, R. L. Waltrip and related parties relating
to life insurance. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
December 28, 2006, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
R.L. Waltrip (including Non-Competition Agreement and
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated November 11, 1991,
among the Company, R. L. Waltrip and Claire Waltrip).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Thomas L. Ryan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Thomas L. Ryan. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Michael R. Webb. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Michael R. Webb. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated December 28, 2006 between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Sumner J. Waring, III.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated December 28, 2006 between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Stephen M. Mack.
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated December 28, 2006 between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Eric D. Tanzberger.
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and Jeffrey E. Curtiss. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Jeffrey E. Curtiss.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement, dated June 30, 2006, between SCI
Funeral & Cemetery Purchasing Cooperative, Inc. and
Jeffrey E. Curtiss.
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Form of Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement pertaining to non-senior officers.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Form of Addendum to Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement pertaining to the preceding exhibit.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock
Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Registration Statement
No. 333-00179
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term
Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated February 12, 1997.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term
Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated November 13, 1997.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Proxy Statement
dated May 13, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan for Senior Officers (as Amended and Restated Effective as
of January 1, 1998). (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan
as Amended and Restated. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 to Registration Statement
No. 333-119681).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to the SCI 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to the SCI 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan, and Third Amendment to the SCI 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the SCI 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Director Fee
Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A to Proxy
Statement dated May 11, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registration
Statement
No. 333-33101).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan dated November 13, 1997. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registration Statement
No. 333-50084).
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan dated November 11, 1999. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.3 Registration Statement
No. 333-50084).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan dated February 14, 2001. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Registration Statement
No. 333-67800).
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registration
Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 15.1 to Registration Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 28.3 to Registration Statement
No. 33-25061
on
Form S-8).
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 28.4 to Registration Statement
No. 33-35708
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 21, 1993).
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.44 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.45 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
|
|
Agreement between Merrill Lynch
Canada Inc. and Service Corporation International. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 28.5 to Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement
No. 33-8907
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement
between Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. and Service Corporation
International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 21, 1993).
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Administration Agreement dated July 25, 2001 between
Service Corporation International (Canada) Limited and Fastrak
Systems Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
for officers and directors. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
|
|
Form of 2005 Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.52 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement,
dated November 28, 2006 among Service Corporation
International and Purchasers identified therein. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated
November 28, 2006 among Service Corporation International,
the lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Powers of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as
Principal Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Eric D.
Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic
Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Principal Executive
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic
Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
In the above list, the management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements are set forth in Exhibits 10.1
through 10.45.
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of
Regulation S-K,
there are not filed as exhibits to this report certain
instruments with respect to long-term debt under which the total
amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed
10 percent of the total assets of Registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Registrant agrees to
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon
request.
121