e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 1-10042
Atmos Energy
Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas and Virginia
|
|
75-1743247
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS employer
identification no.)
|
|
|
|
Three Lincoln Centre, Suite 1800
5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
75240
(Zip code)
|
(972) 934-9227
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated
Filer þ Accelerated
Filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o Smaller
Reporting
Company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act) Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers
classes of common stock, as of January 27, 2009.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
No Par Value
|
|
91,634,602
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY
OF KEY TERMS
|
|
|
AEC
|
|
Atmos Energy Corporation
|
AEH
|
|
Atmos Energy Holdings, Inc.
|
AEM
|
|
Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC
|
AOCI
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
APS
|
|
Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC
|
Bcf
|
|
Billion cubic feet
|
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board
|
Fitch
|
|
Fitch Ratings, Ltd.
|
GRIP
|
|
Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program
|
Mcf
|
|
Thousand cubic feet
|
MMcf
|
|
Million cubic feet
|
Moodys
|
|
Moodys Investors Services, Inc.
|
NYMEX
|
|
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
|
RRC
|
|
Railroad Commission of Texas
|
RRM
|
|
Rate Review Mechanism
|
S&P
|
|
Standard & Poors Corporation
|
SEC
|
|
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
|
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
|
WNA
|
|
Weather Normalization Adjustment
|
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
5,803,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,730,156
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,608,743
|
|
|
|
1,593,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,194,748
|
|
|
|
4,136,859
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
69,799
|
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
833,125
|
|
|
|
477,151
|
|
Gas stored underground
|
|
|
582,743
|
|
|
|
576,617
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
197,441
|
|
|
|
184,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,683,108
|
|
|
|
1,285,104
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
738,929
|
|
|
|
739,086
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
202,114
|
|
|
|
225,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,818,899
|
|
|
$
|
6,386,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value (stated at $.005 per share);
200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
December 31, 2008 91,599,495 shares;
September 30, 2008 90,814,683 shares
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,757,834
|
|
|
|
1,744,384
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
381,633
|
|
|
|
343,601
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(61,849
|
)
|
|
|
(35,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,078,076
|
|
|
|
2,052,492
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,719,920
|
|
|
|
2,119,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
3,797,996
|
|
|
|
4,172,284
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
815,095
|
|
|
|
395,388
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
441,481
|
|
|
|
460,372
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
360,833
|
|
|
|
350,542
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
400,507
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,017,916
|
|
|
|
1,207,087
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
431,324
|
|
|
|
441,302
|
|
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
|
|
|
305,784
|
|
|
|
298,645
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
265,879
|
|
|
|
267,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,818,899
|
|
|
$
|
6,386,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements
2
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas distribution segment
|
|
$
|
1,055,968
|
|
|
$
|
928,177
|
|
Regulated transmission and storage segment
|
|
|
54,682
|
|
|
|
45,046
|
|
Natural gas marketing segment
|
|
|
787,495
|
|
|
|
840,717
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other segment
|
|
|
16,448
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(198,261
|
)
|
|
|
(163,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,332
|
|
|
|
1,657,510
|
|
Purchased gas cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas distribution segment
|
|
|
757,584
|
|
|
|
654,977
|
|
Regulated transmission and storage segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas marketing segment
|
|
|
757,472
|
|
|
|
794,754
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other segment
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(197,839
|
)
|
|
|
(162,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321,120
|
|
|
|
1,287,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
395,212
|
|
|
|
369,638
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
134,755
|
|
|
|
121,189
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,126
|
|
|
|
48,513
|
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
44,137
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
232,018
|
|
|
|
211,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
163,194
|
|
|
|
158,509
|
|
Miscellaneous expense
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
38,991
|
|
|
|
36,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
123,902
|
|
|
|
121,599
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
47,939
|
|
|
|
47,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.330
|
|
|
$
|
0.325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
90,471
|
|
|
|
89,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
91,066
|
|
|
|
89,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements
3
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53,126
|
|
|
|
48,513
|
|
Charged to other accounts
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
|
11,978
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
Net assets / liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
(22,793
|
)
|
|
|
16,883
|
|
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
|
|
(94,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
150,715
|
|
|
|
61,437
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(107,367
|
)
|
|
|
(94,155
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(108,577
|
)
|
|
|
(96,029
|
)
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in short-term debt
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
50,690
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(1,741
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(30,165
|
)
|
|
|
(29,178
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(19,056
|
)
|
|
|
25,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,082
|
|
|
|
(8,851
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
|
|
60,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
69,799
|
|
|
$
|
51,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements
4
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
December 31, 2008
Atmos Energy Corporation (Atmos Energy or the
Company) and our subsidiaries are engaged primarily
in the regulated natural gas distribution and transmission and
storage businesses as well as certain other nonregulated
businesses. Through our natural gas distribution business, we
deliver natural gas through sales and transportation
arrangements to approximately 3.2 million residential,
commercial, public authority and industrial customers through
our six regulated natural gas distribution divisions in the
service areas described below:
|
|
|
Division
|
|
Service Area
|
|
Atmos Energy Colorado-Kansas Division
|
|
Colorado, Kansas,
Missouri(1)
|
Atmos Energy Kentucky/Mid-States Division
|
|
Georgia(1),
Illinois(1),
Iowa(1),
Kentucky,
Missouri(1),
Tennessee,
Virginia(1)
|
Atmos Energy Louisiana Division
|
|
Louisiana
|
Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division
|
|
Texas, including the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area
|
Atmos Energy Mississippi Division
|
|
Mississippi
|
Atmos Energy West Texas Division
|
|
West Texas
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Denotes states where we have more limited service areas. |
In addition, we transport natural gas for others through our
distribution system. Our natural gas distribution business is
subject to federal and state regulation
and/or
regulation by local authorities in each of the states in which
our natural gas distribution divisions operate. Our corporate
headquarters and shared-services function are located in Dallas,
Texas, and our customer support centers are located in Amarillo
and Waco, Texas.
Our regulated transmission and storage business consists of the
regulated operations of our Atmos Pipeline Texas
Division. The Atmos Pipeline Texas Division
transports natural gas to our Mid-Tex Division, transports
natural gas for third parties and manages five underground
storage reservoirs in Texas. We also provide ancillary services
customary to the pipeline industry including parking
arrangements, lending and sales of inventory on hand. Parking
arrangements provide short-term interruptible storage of gas on
our pipeline. Lending services provide short-term interruptible
loans of natural gas from our pipeline to meet market demands.
Our nonregulated businesses operate primarily in the Midwest and
Southeast and include our natural gas marketing operations and
pipeline, storage and other operations. These businesses are
operated through various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Atmos
Energy Holdings, Inc. (AEH), which is wholly owned by the
Company and based in Houston, Texas.
Our natural gas marketing operations are conducted through Atmos
Energy Marketing, LLC (AEM), which is wholly owned by AEH. AEM
provides a variety of natural gas management services to
municipalities, natural gas utility systems and industrial
natural gas customers, primarily in the Southeast and Midwest
and to our Colorado-Kansas, Kentucky/Mid-States and Louisiana
divisions. These services consist primarily of furnishing
natural gas supplies at fixed and market-based prices, contract
negotiation and administration, load forecasting, gas storage
acquisition and management services, transportation services,
peaking sales and balancing services, capacity utilization
strategies and gas price hedging through the use of financial
instruments.
5
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our pipeline, storage and other segment primarily consists of
the operations of Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC (APS) and
Atmos Power Systems, Inc., which are wholly owned by AEH. APS
owns or has an interest in underground storage fields in
Kentucky and Louisiana. We use these storage facilities to
reduce the need to contract for additional pipeline capacity to
meet customer demand during peak periods. Additionally, APS
manages our natural gas gathering operations. These operations
did not significantly impact our financial results for the
period ended December 31, 2008. Through Atmos Power
Systems, Inc., we have constructed electric peaking
power-generating plants and associated facilities and lease
these plants through lease agreements that are accounted for as
sales under generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States.
|
|
2.
|
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
|
In the opinion of management, all material adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair
presentation have been made to the unaudited consolidated
interim-period financial statements. These consolidated
interim-period financial statements are condensed as permitted
by the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements of Atmos Energy Corporation included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Because of
seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the
three-month period ended December 31, 2008 are not
indicative of our results of operations for the full 2009 fiscal
year, which ends September 30, 2009.
Significant
accounting policies
Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the
financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, and there
were no changes to those policies. However, during the three
months ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a
non-recurring $8.1 million increase in gross profit
associated with a one-time update to our estimate for gas
delivered to customers but not yet billed, resulting from base
rate changes in several jurisdictions.
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 157, Fair Value
Measurements, the measurement date requirements of
SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R ), SFAS 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 and SFAS 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133. Except for the adoption of
these accounting pronouncements, which are further discussed
below, there were no significant changes to our accounting
policies during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and enhances disclosure on fair value
measurements required under other accounting pronouncements but
does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an
instrument is carried at fair value. The adoption of this
standard did not materially impact our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. The new disclosures
required by this standard are presented in Note 4.
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted the
measurement date requirements of SFAS 158 using the
remeasurement approach. Under this approach, the Company
remeasured its projected benefit obligation, fair value of plan
assets and its fiscal 2009 net periodic cost. In accordance
with the transition rules of SFAS 158, the impact of
changing the measurement date from June 30, 2008 to
September 30, 2008 decreased retained earnings by
$7.8 million, net of tax, decreased the unrecognized
actuarial loss by $9.0 million and increased our
postretirement liabilities by $3.5 million.
SFAS 159 permits an entity to measure certain financial
assets and financial liabilities at fair value. The objective of
the standard is to improve financial reporting by allowing
entities to mitigate volatility in reported
6
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities
differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. Entities that elect the fair value option will
report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected
on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis. The fair value option is irrevocable, unless a new
election date occurs. The adoption of this standard did not
impact our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities. This statement requires
specific disclosures regarding how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments; the accounting for derivative
instruments and related hedged items; and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Since
SFAS 161 only requires additional disclosures concerning
derivatives and hedging activities, this standard did not have
an impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. The new disclosures required by this standard are
presented in Note 3.
Regulatory
assets and liabilities
We record certain costs as regulatory assets in accordance with
SFAS 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation, when future recovery through customer rates is
considered probable. Regulatory liabilities are recorded when it
is probable that revenues will be reduced for amounts that will
be credited to customers through the ratemaking process.
Substantially all of our regulatory assets are recorded as a
component of deferred charges and other assets and substantially
all of our regulatory liabilities are recorded as a component of
deferred credits and other liabilities. Deferred gas costs are
recorded either in other current assets or liabilities and the
regulatory cost of removal obligation is reported separately.
Significant regulatory assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 included the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Regulatory assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit costs
|
|
$
|
90,394
|
|
|
$
|
100,563
|
|
Merger and integration costs, net
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
7,586
|
|
Deferred gas costs
|
|
|
122,524
|
|
|
|
55,103
|
|
Environmental costs
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
Rate case costs
|
|
|
11,243
|
|
|
|
12,885
|
|
Deferred franchise fees
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
8,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
240,793
|
|
|
$
|
186,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gas costs
|
|
$
|
68,226
|
|
|
$
|
76,979
|
|
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
|
|
|
323,517
|
|
|
|
317,273
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,569
|
|
|
|
5,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
397,312
|
|
|
$
|
399,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, our authorized rates do not include a return on
certain of our merger and integration costs; however, we recover
the amortization of these costs. Merger and integration costs,
net, are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over
estimated useful lives ranging up to 20 years.
Environmental costs have been deferred to be included in future
rate filings in accordance with rulings received from various
state regulatory commissions.
7
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive
income (loss), net of related tax, for the three-month periods
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments, net of tax
expense (benefit) of $(3,330) and $714
|
|
|
(5,433
|
)
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
Other than temporary impairment of investments, net of tax
expense of $790
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of interest rate hedging transactions, net of tax
expense of $482 and $482
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on commodity hedging transactions,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $(13,817) and $4,937
|
|
|
(22,544
|
)
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
50,061
|
|
|
$
|
83,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 consisted of
the following unrealized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments
|
|
$
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
Treasury lock agreements
|
|
|
(10,317
|
)
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(48,297
|
)
|
|
|
(25,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We currently use financial instruments to mitigate commodity
price risk. Additionally, we periodically utilize financial
instruments to manage interest rate risk. The objectives and
strategies for using financial instruments have been tailored to
our regulated and nonregulated businesses. The accounting for
these financial instruments is fully described in Note 2 to
the financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Currently, we
utilize financial instruments in our natural gas distribution,
natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and other segments.
However, our pipeline, storage and other segment uses financial
instruments acquired from AEM on the same terms that AEM
received from an independent counterparty. We currently do not
manage commodity price risk with financial instruments in our
regulated transmission and storage segment. On a consolidated
basis, these financial instruments are reported in the natural
gas marketing segment.
Our financial instruments do not contain any credit-risk-related
or other contingent features that could cause accelerated
payments when our financial instruments are in net liability
positions.
Regulated
Commodity Risk Management Activities
In our natural gas distribution segment, our customers are
exposed to the effect of volatile natural gas prices. We manage
this exposure through a combination of physical storage,
fixed-price forward contracts and
8
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial instruments, primarily over-the-counter swap and
option contracts, in an effort to minimize the impact of natural
gas price volatility on our customers during the winter heating
season.
Our natural gas distribution gas supply department is
responsible for executing this segments commodity risk
management activities in conformity with regulatory
requirements. In jurisdictions where we are permitted to
mitigate commodity price risk through financial instruments, the
relevant regulatory authorities may establish the level of
heating season gas purchases that can be hedged. If the
regulatory authority does not establish this level, we seek to
hedge between 25 and 50 percent of anticipated heating
season gas purchases using financial instruments. For the
2008-2009
heating season, in the jurisdictions where we are permitted to
utilize financial instruments, we anticipate hedging
approximately 29 percent, or 25,450 MMcf of the
anticipated winter flowing gas requirements. We have not
designated these financial instruments as hedges pursuant to
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
The costs associated with and the gains and losses arising from
the use of financial instruments to mitigate commodity price
risk are included in our purchased gas adjustment mechanisms in
accordance with regulatory requirements. Therefore, changes in
the fair value of these financial instruments are initially
recorded as a component of deferred gas costs and recognized in
the consolidated statement of income as a component of purchased
gas cost when the related costs are recovered through our rates
and recognized in revenue in accordance with SFAS 71.
Accordingly, there is no earnings impact to our natural gas
distribution segment as a result of the use of financial
instruments.
Nonregulated
Commodity Risk Management Activities
Our natural gas marketing segment, through AEM, aggregates and
purchases gas supply, arranges transportation
and/or
storage logistics and ultimately delivers gas to our customers
at competitive prices. To facilitate this process, we utilize
proprietary and customer-owned transportation and storage assets
to provide the various services our customers request.
We also perform asset optimization activities in both our
natural gas marketing segment and pipeline, storage and other
segment. Through asset optimization activities, we seek to
maximize the economic value associated with the storage and
transportation capacity we own or control. We attempt to meet
this objective by engaging in natural gas storage transactions
in which we seek to find and profit from the pricing differences
that occur over time. We purchase physical natural gas and then
sell financial instruments at advantageous prices to lock in a
gross profit margin. We also seek to participate in transactions
in which we combine the natural gas commodity and transportation
costs to minimize our costs incurred to serve our customers by
identifying the lowest cost alternative within the natural gas
supplies, transportation and markets to which we have access.
Through the use of transportation and storage services and
financial instruments, we also seek to capture gross profit
margin through the arbitrage of pricing differences that exist
in various locations and by recognizing pricing differences that
occur over time. Over time, gains and losses on the sale of
storage gas inventory will be offset by gains and losses on the
financial instruments, resulting in the realization of the
economic gross profit margin we anticipated at the time we
structured the original transaction.
As a result of these activities, our nonregulated operations are
exposed to risks associated with changes in the market price of
natural gas. We manage our exposure to such risks through a
combination of physical storage and financial instruments,
including futures, over-the-counter and exchange-traded options
and swap contracts with counterparties. Future contracts provide
the right to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed price in the
future. Option contracts provide the right, but not the
requirement, to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed price. Swap
contracts require receipt of payment for the commodity based on
the difference between a fixed price and the market price on the
settlement date.
We use financial instruments, designated as cash flow hedges of
anticipated purchases and sales at index prices, to mitigate the
commodity price risk in our natural gas marketing segment
associated with deliveries
9
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
under fixed-priced forward contracts to deliver gas to
customers. These financial instruments have maturity dates
ranging from one to 54 months. The effective portion of the
unrealized gains and losses arising from the use of cash flow
hedges is recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI) on the balance sheet. Amounts
associated with cash flow hedges recognized in the income
statement include (1) the amount of unrealized gain or loss
that has been reclassified from AOCI when the hedged volumes are
sold and (2) the amount of ineffectiveness associated with
these hedges in the period the ineffectiveness arises.
We use financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges,
to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of our
natural gas inventory used in our asset optimization activities
in our natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and other
segments. Therefore, gains and losses arising from these
financial instruments should offset the changes in the fair
value of the hedged item to the extent the hedging relationship
is effective. Ineffectiveness is recognized in the income
statement in the period the ineffectiveness arises.
Also, in our natural gas marketing segment, we use storage swaps
and futures to capture additional storage arbitrage
opportunities that arise subsequent to the execution of the
original fair value hedge associated with our physical natural
gas inventory, basis swaps to insulate and protect the economic
value of our fixed price and storage books and various
over-the-counter and exchange-traded options. These financial
instruments have not been designated as hedges pursuant to
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
Our nonregulated risk management activities are controlled
through various risk management policies and procedures. Our
Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for our
nonregulated risk management limits and policies. Our risk
management committee, comprised of corporate and business unit
officers, is responsible for establishing and enforcing our
nonregulated risk management policies and procedures.
Under our risk management policies, we seek to match our
financial instrument positions to our physical storage positions
as well as our expected current and future sales and purchase
obligations to maintain no open positions at the end of each
trading day. The determination of our net open position as of
any day, however, requires us to make assumptions as to future
circumstances, including the use of gas by our customers in
relation to our anticipated storage and market positions.
Because the price risk associated with any net open position at
the end of each day may increase if the assumptions are not
realized, we review these assumptions as part of our daily
monitoring activities. We can also be affected by intraday
fluctuations of gas prices, since the price of natural gas
purchased or sold for future delivery earlier in the day may not
be hedged until later in the day. At times, limited net open
positions related to our existing and anticipated commitments
may occur. At the close of business on December 31, 2008,
AEH had a net open position (including existing storage) of
0.1 Bcf.
Interest
Rate Risk Management Activities
Currently, we are not managing interest rate risk with financial
instruments. However, in prior years, we periodically managed
interest rate risk by entering into Treasury lock agreements to
fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated
with anticipated financings. These Treasury locks were settled
at various times at a net loss. These realized gains and losses
were recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) and are being recognized as a component of
interest expense over the life of the associated notes from the
date of settlement. The remaining amortization periods for these
Treasury locks extend through fiscal 2035. However, the majority
of the remaining amounts of these Treasury locks will be
recognized as a component of interest expense through fiscal
2017.
Quantitative
Disclosures Related to Financial Instruments
The following tables present detailed information concerning the
impact of financial instruments on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet and income statements.
As of December 31, 2008, our financial instruments were
comprised of both long and short commodity positions, whereby a
long position is a contract to purchase the commodity, while a
short position is a contract
10
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to sell the commodity. As of December 31, 2008, we had net
long/(short) commodity contracts outstanding in the following
quantities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
Hedge
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage
|
|
Contract Type
|
|
Designation
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity (MMcf)
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,655
|
)
|
|
|
(1,883
|
)
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,641
|
|
|
|
(3,390
|
)
|
|
|
Not designated
|
|
|
14,314
|
|
|
|
51,467
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,314
|
|
|
|
82,453
|
|
|
|
(3,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The following tables present the fair value and balance sheet
classification of our financial instruments by operating segment
as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008. As
required by SFAS 161, the fair value amounts below are
presented on a gross basis and do not reflect the netting of
asset and liability positions permitted under the terms of our
master netting arrangements. Further, the amounts below do not
include $75.8 million and $56.6 million of cash held
on deposit in margin accounts as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 to collateralize certain financial
instruments. Therefore, these gross balances are not indicative
of either our actual credit exposure or net economic exposure.
Additionally, the amounts below will not agree with the amounts
presented on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, nor will
they agree to the fair value information presented for our
financial instruments in Note 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Marketing(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated As Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
115,937
|
|
|
$
|
115,937
|
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,678
|
|
|
|
10,678
|
|
Liability Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145,464
|
)
|
|
|
(145,464
|
)
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,095
|
)
|
|
|
(20,095
|
)
|
Not Designated As Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,168
|
|
|
|
252,168
|
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
44,524
|
|
|
|
44,543
|
|
Liability Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(47,448
|
)
|
|
|
(264,359
|
)
|
|
|
(311,807
|
)
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
|
|
(40,836
|
)
|
|
|
(44,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(51,314
|
)
|
|
|
(8,503
|
)
|
|
|
(59,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our pipeline, storage and other segment uses financial
instruments acquired from AEM on the same terms that AEM
received from an independent counterparty. On a consolidated
basis, these financial instruments are reported in the natural
gas marketing segment; however, the underlying hedged item is
reported in the pipeline, storage and other segment. |
11
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Marketing(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated As Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,696
|
|
|
$
|
110,696
|
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,984
|
|
|
|
4,984
|
|
Liability Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,900
|
)
|
|
|
(98,900
|
)
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,574
|
|
|
|
16,574
|
|
Not Designated As Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,200
|
|
|
|
115,200
|
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
Liability Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current commodity contracts
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(58,566
|
)
|
|
|
(115,337
|
)
|
|
|
(173,903
|
)
|
Noncurrent commodity contracts
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(5,111
|
)
|
|
|
(6,966
|
)
|
|
|
(12,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(63,677
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(63,709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
(63,677
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,542
|
|
|
$
|
(47,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our pipeline, storage and other segment uses financial
instruments acquired from AEM on the same terms that AEM
received from an independent counterparty. On a consolidated
basis, these financial instruments are reported in the natural
gas marketing segment; however, the underlying hedged item is
reported in the pipeline, storage and other segment. |
Impact of
Financial Instruments on the Income Statement
The following tables present the impact that financial
instruments had on our condensed consolidated income statement,
by operating segment, as applicable, for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Unrealized margins recorded in our natural gas marketing and
pipeline, storage and other segments are comprised of various
components, including, but not limited to, unrealized gains and
losses arising from hedge ineffectiveness. Our hedge
ineffectiveness primarily results from differences in the
location and timing of the derivative instrument and the hedged
item and could materially affect our results of operations for
the reported period. For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 we recognized a gain arising
from fair value and cash flow hedge ineffectiveness of
$20.4 million and $38.8 million. Additional
information regarding ineffectiveness recognized in the income
statement is included in the tables below. Although these
unrealized gains and losses are currently recorded in our income
statement, they are not necessarily indicative of the economic
gross profit we anticipate realizing when the underlying
physical and financial transactions are settled.
12
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Hedges
The impact of commodity contracts designated as fair value
hedges and the related hedged item on our condensed consolidated
income statement for the three months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
25,683
|
|
|
$
|
3,939
|
|
|
$
|
29,622
|
|
Fair value adjustment for natural gas inventory designated as
the hedged item
|
|
|
(11,860
|
)
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(13,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on revenue
|
|
$
|
13,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
16,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact on revenue is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis ineffectiveness
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
Timing ineffectiveness
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
14,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,823
|
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
16,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
17,227
|
|
|
$
|
2,123
|
|
|
$
|
19,350
|
|
Fair value adjustment for natural gas inventory designated as
the hedged item
|
|
|
17,601
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
18,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on revenue
|
|
$
|
34,828
|
|
|
$
|
3,180
|
|
|
$
|
38,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact on revenue is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis ineffectiveness
|
|
$
|
1,956
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,956
|
|
Timing ineffectiveness
|
|
|
32,872
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
36,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,828
|
|
|
$
|
3,180
|
|
|
$
|
38,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis ineffectiveness arises from natural gas market price
differences between the locations of the hedged inventory and
the delivery location specified in the hedge instruments. Timing
ineffectiveness arises due to changes in the difference between
the spot price and the futures price, as well as the difference
between the timing of the settlement of the futures and the
valuation of the underlying physical commodity. As the commodity
contract nears the settlement date, spot to forward price
differences should converge, which should reduce or eliminate
the impact of this ineffectiveness on revenue.
Cash
Flow Hedges
The impact of cash flow hedges on our condensed consolidated
income statement for the three months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 is presented below. Note that this presentation
does not reflect the financial impact arising from the hedged
physical transaction. Therefore, this presentation is not
indicative of the economic gross profit we realized when the
underlying physical and financial transactions were settled.
13
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into revenue for effective
portion of commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(28,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,968
|
|
|
$
|
(20,276
|
)
|
Gain arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,052
|
)
|
|
|
7,968
|
|
|
|
(16,084
|
)
|
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI
into interest expense
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
$
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,052
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,968
|
|
|
$
|
(17,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into revenue for effective
portion of commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,254
|
)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
(8,829
|
)
|
Gain arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,495
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
(8,070
|
)
|
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI
into interest expense
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
$
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
(9,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the gains and losses arising from
hedging transactions that were recognized as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. The amounts
included in the table below exclude gains and losses arising
from ineffectiveness because these amounts are immediately
recognized in the income statement as incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury lock agreements
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forward commodity contracts
|
|
|
(35,115
|
)
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
Recognition of losses in earnings due to settlements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury lock agreements
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Forward commodity contracts
|
|
|
12,571
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) from hedging, net of
tax(1)
|
|
$
|
(21,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Utilizing an income tax rate of approximately 38 percent
comprised of the effective rates in each taxing jurisdiction. |
14
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following amounts, net of deferred taxes, represent the
expected recognition in earnings of the deferred losses recorded
in AOCI associated with our financial instruments, based upon
the fair values of these financial instruments as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lock
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Next twelve months
|
|
$
|
(2,908
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,179
|
)
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
(7,409
|
)
|
|
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
|
(10,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
$
|
(10,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,297
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Utilizing an income tax rate of approximately 38 percent
comprised of the effective rates in each taxing jurisdiction. |
Financial
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
The impact of financial instruments that have not been
designated as hedges on our condensed consolidated income
statement for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 is presented below. Note that this presentation does not
reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying
physical transactions associated with these financial
instruments. Therefore, this presentation is not indicative of
the economic gross profit we realized when the underlying
physical and financial transactions were settled.
As discussed above, financial instruments used in our natural
gas distribution segment are not designated as hedges. However,
there is no earnings impact to our natural gas distribution
segment as a result of the use of these financial instruments
because the gains and losses arising from the use of these
financial instruments are recognized in the consolidated
statement of income as a component of purchased gas cost when
the related costs are recovered through our rates and recognized
in revenue. Accordingly, the impact of these financial
instruments is excluded from this presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Natural gas marketing commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
(3,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other commodity contracts
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on revenue
|
|
$
|
(3,915
|
)
|
|
$
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
Statement does not require any new fair value measurements;
rather it provides guidance on how to perform fair value
measurements as required or permitted under previous accounting
pronouncements.
We prospectively adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 on
October 1, 2008 for most of the financial assets and
liabilities recorded on our balance sheet at fair value.
Adoption of this statement for these assets and liabilities did
not have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
provided a one-year deferral of SFAS 157 for nonrecurring
fair value measurements associated with our
15
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
nonfinancial assets and liabilities. Under this partial
deferral, SFAS 157 will not be effective until
October 1, 2009 for fair value measurements in the
following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
|
Most nonfinancial assets and liabilities that may be acquired in
a business combination
|
|
|
|
Impairment analyses performed for nonfinancial assets
|
We believe the adoption of SFAS 157 to these nonfinancial
areas will not have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active, which clarified the
application of SFAS 157 in inactive markets. This FSP did
not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
SFAS 157 also applies to the valuation of our pension and
post-retirement plan assets, and the adoption of this standard
did not affect these valuations. SFAS 157 specifically
excluded pension and post-retirement assets from its prescribed
disclosure provisions. Accordingly, these plan assets are not
included in the tabular disclosures below. However, in December
2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets, which will, among other things, require disclosure
about fair value measurements similar to those required by
SFAS 157. This FSP will impact our annual disclosure
requirements beginning in fiscal 2010.
Determining
Fair Value
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date (exit price). We primarily use quoted market
prices and other observable market pricing information in
valuing our financial assets and liabilities and minimize the
use of unobservable pricing inputs in our measurements.
Prices actively quoted on national exchanges are used to
determine the fair value of most of our assets and liabilities
recorded on our balance sheet at fair value. Within our
nonregulated operations, we utilize a mid-market pricing
convention (the mid-point between the bid and ask prices) as a
practical expedient for determining fair value measurement, as
permitted under SFAS 157. Values derived from these sources
reflect the market in which transactions involving these
financial instruments are executed. We utilize models and other
valuation methods to determine fair value when external sources
are not available. Values are adjusted to reflect the potential
impact of an orderly liquidation of our positions over a
reasonable period of time under then-current market conditions.
We believe the market prices and models used to value these
assets and liabilities represent the best information available
with respect to closing exchange and over-the-counter
quotations, time value and volatility factors underlying the
assets and liabilities.
Fair-value estimates also consider our own creditworthiness and
the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved. Our
counterparties consist primarily of financial institutions and
major energy companies. This concentration of counterparties may
materially impact our exposure to credit risk resulting from
market, economic or regulatory conditions. Recent adverse
developments in the global financial and credit markets have
made it more difficult and more expensive for companies to
access the short-term capital markets, which may negatively
impact the creditworthiness of our counterparties. A continued
tightening of the credit markets could cause more of our
counterparties to fail to perform. We seek to minimize
counterparty credit risk through an evaluation of their
financial condition and credit ratings and the use of collateral
requirements under certain circumstances.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value based on
observable and unobservable data. The hierarchy categorizes the
inputs into three levels, with the highest priority given to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority
given to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The levels of the
hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An
active market for the asset or liability is defined as a market
in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information
on an ongoing basis. Our Level 1
16
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
measurements consist primarily of exchange-traded financial
instruments, gas stored underground that has been designated as
the hedged item in a fair value hedge and our available-for-sale
securities.
Level 2 Pricing inputs other
than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either
directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability as
of the reporting date. These inputs are derived principally from
or corroborated by observable market data. Our Level 2
measurements primarily consist of non-exchange-traded financial
instruments such as over-the-counter options and swaps where
market data for pricing is observable.
Level 3 Generally
unobservable pricing inputs which are developed based on the
best information available, including our own internal data, in
situations where there is little if any market activity for the
asset or liability at the measurement date. The pricing inputs
utilized reflect what a market participant would use to
determine fair value. Currently, we have no assets or
liabilities recorded at fair value that would qualify for
Level 3 reporting.
Quantitative
Disclosures
The classification of our fair value measurements requires
judgment regarding the degree to which market data are
observable or corroborated by observable market data. The
following table summarizes, by level within the fair value
hierarchy, our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at
fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008. As
required under SFAS 157, assets and liabilities are
categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Netting of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Collateral(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas distribution segment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Natural gas marketing segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
|
53,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
|
|
53,308
|
|
Hedged portion of gas stored underground Natural gas marketing
segment
|
|
|
71,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,478
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other
segment(2)
|
|
|
6,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas stored underground
|
|
|
78,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,290
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
27,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
106,273
|
|
|
$
|
39,050
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,258
|
|
|
$
|
159,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas distribution segment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,333
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,333
|
|
Natural gas marketing segment
|
|
|
61,567
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,567
|
)
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
61,567
|
|
|
$
|
57,395
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had $75.8 million of cash
held in margin accounts to collateralize certain financial
instruments. Of this amount, $61.6 million was used to offset
financial instruments in a liability position. The remaining
$14.2 million has been reflected as a financial instrument
asset. |
|
(2) |
|
Our pipeline, storage and other segment uses financial
instruments acquired from AEM on the same terms that AEM
received from an independent counterparty. On a consolidated
basis, these financial instruments are reported in the natural
gas marketing segment; however, the underlying hedged item is
reported in the pipeline, storage and other segment. |
17
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our long-term debt, including current maturities, is recorded on
our balance sheet at carrying value. However, SFAS 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
requires disclosure concerning the fair value of our debt.
The fair value of our debt is determined using a discounted cash
flow analysis based upon borrowing rates currently available to
us, the remaining average maturities and our credit rating. The
following table presents the carrying value and fair value of
our debt as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
$
|
2,123,334
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
$
|
1,773,869
|
|
The fair value as of December 31, 2008 was calculated
utilizing discount rates ranging from 6.8 percent to
9.4 percent, remaining average maturities ranging from one
to 26 years, and a credit adjustment of 6.4 percent.
Long-term
debt
Long-term debt at December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unsecured 4.00% Senior Notes, due October 2009
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Unsecured 7.375% Senior Notes, due 2011
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
Unsecured 10% Notes, due 2011
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
Unsecured 5.125% Senior Notes, due 2013
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Unsecured 4.95% Senior Notes, due 2014
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Unsecured 6.35% Senior Notes, due 2017
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Unsecured 5.95% Senior Notes, due 2034
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Medium term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A,
1995-2,
6.27%, due 2010
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Series A,
1995-1,
6.67%, due 2025
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Unsecured 6.75% Debentures, due 2028
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Other term notes due in installments through 2013
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
2,123,334
|
|
|
|
2,123,612
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original issue discount on unsecured senior notes and debentures
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
|
|
(3,035
|
)
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(400,507
|
)
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,719,920
|
|
|
$
|
2,119,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As noted above, our unsecured 4.00% senior notes will
mature in October 2009; accordingly, they have been classified
within the current maturities of long-term debt. We are
currently evaluating alternatives to refinance this debt, and we
believe this refinancing effort will be successful.
Short-term
debt
Our short-term borrowing requirements are affected by the
seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Changes in the
price of natural gas and the amount of natural gas we need to
supply our customers needs
18
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
could significantly affect our borrowing requirements. Our
short-term borrowings reach their highest levels in the winter
months.
We finance our short-term borrowing requirements through a
combination of a $600 million commercial paper program and
four committed revolving credit facilities with third-party
lenders that provide $1.2 billion of working capital
funding. At December 31, 2008, there was
$360.8 million of short-term debt outstanding, comprised of
$202.9 million under our bank credit facilities and
$157.9 million outstanding under our commercial paper
program. At September 30, 2008, there was
$350.5 million of short-term debt outstanding, comprised of
$330.5 million outstanding under our bank credit facilities
and $20.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper
program. We also use intercompany credit facilities to
supplement the funding provided by these third-party committed
credit facilities. These facilities are described in greater
detail below.
Regulated
Operations
We fund our regulated operations as needed primarily through a
$600 million commercial paper program and three committed
revolving credit facilities with third-party lenders that
provide approximately $800 million of working capital
funding. The first facility is a five-year unsecured facility,
expiring December 2011, that bears interest at a base rate or at
a LIBOR-based rate for the applicable interest period, plus a
spread ranging from 0.30 percent to 0.75 percent,
based on the Companys credit ratings. This credit facility
serves as a backup liquidity facility for our commercial paper
program. At the time this credit facility was established,
borrowings under this facility were limited to
$600 million. However, in September 2008, the limit on
borrowings was effectively reduced to $566.7 million after
one lender with a 5.55% share of the commitments ceased funding
under the facility. At December 31, 2008, the total amount
used under this facility was $360.8 million and
$205.9 million was available.
The second facility is a $212.5 million unsecured
364-day
facility expiring October 2009, that bears interest at a base
rate or at a LIBOR-based rate for the applicable interest
period, plus a spread ranging from 1.25 percent to
2.50 percent, based on the Companys credit ratings.
At December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding
under this facility.
The third facility is an $18 million unsecured facility
expiring in March 2009 that bears interest at a daily negotiated
rate, generally based on the Federal Funds rate plus a variable
margin. At December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings
outstanding under this facility.
The availability of funds under these credit facilities is
subject to conditions specified in the respective credit
agreements, all of which we currently satisfy. These conditions
include our compliance with financial covenants and the
continued accuracy of representations and warranties contained
in these agreements. We are required by the financial covenants
in each of these facilities to maintain, at the end of each
fiscal quarter, a ratio of total debt to total capitalization of
no greater than 70 percent. At December 31, 2008, our
total-debt-to-total-capitalization ratio, as defined, was
57 percent. In addition, both the interest margin over the
Eurodollar rate and the fee that we pay on unused amounts under
each of these facilities are subject to adjustment depending
upon our credit ratings.
In addition to these third-party facilities, our regulated
operations had a $200 million intercompany revolving credit
facility with AEH. Through December 31, 2008, this facility
bore interest at the one-month LIBOR rate plus
0.20 percent. There was $40.9 million outstanding
under this facility at December 31, 2008. In January 2009,
this facility was replaced with a new $200 million
364 day-facility that bears interest at the lower of (i)
the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.45 percent or (ii) the
marginal borrowing rate available to the Company on the date of
borrowing. The marginal borrowing rate is defined as the lower
of (i) a rate based upon the lower of the Prime Rate or the
Eurodollar rate under the five year revolving credit facility or
(ii) the lowest rate outstanding under the commercial paper
program. Applicable state regulatory commissions have approved
the new facility through December 31, 2009.
19
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Nonregulated
Operations
On December 30, 2008, AEM and the participating banks
amended and restated AEMs former uncommitted credit
facility, primarily to convert the $580 million uncommitted
demand credit facility to a
364-day
$375 million committed revolving credit facility and extend
it to December 29, 2009.
The amended facility also provides the ability for AEM to
increase the borrowing base up to a maximum of
$450 million, subject to the approval of the participating
banks; adds a swing line loan feature; adjusts the interest rate
on borrowings as discussed below and increases the fees paid to
reflect the facilitys conversion to a committed facility
and current credit market conditions.
AEM will use this facility primarily to issue letters of credit
and, on a less frequent basis, to borrow funds for gas purchases
and other working capital needs. At AEMs option,
borrowings made under the credit facility are based on a base
rate or an offshore rate, in each case plus an applicable
margin. The base rate is a floating rate equal to the higher of:
(a) 0.50 percent per annum above the latest federal
funds rate; (b) the per annum rate of interest established
by BNP Paribas from time to time as its prime rate
or base rate for U.S. dollar loans; (c) an
offshore rate (based on LIBOR with a one-month interest period)
as in effect from time to time; and (d) the cost of
funds rate based on an average of interest rates reported
by one or more of the lenders to the administrative agent. The
offshore rate is a floating rate equal to the higher of
(a) an offshore rate based upon LIBOR for the applicable
interest period; and (b) a cost of funds rate
referred to above. In the case of both base rate and offshore
rate loans, the applicable margin ranges from 2.250 percent
to 2.625 percent per annum, depending on the excess
tangible net worth of AEM, as defined in the credit facility.
This facility is collateralized by substantially all of the
assets of AEM and is guaranteed by AEH.
At December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding
under this credit facility. However, at December 31, 2008,
AEM letters of credit totaling $100.0 million had been
issued under the facility, which reduced the amount available by
a corresponding amount. The amount available under this credit
facility is also limited by various covenants, including
covenants based on working capital. Under the most restrictive
covenant, the amount available to AEM under this credit facility
was $177.8 million at December 31, 2008.
AEM is required by the financial covenants in this facility to
maintain a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth that
does not exceed a maximum of 5 to 1. At December 31, 2008,
AEMs ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, as
defined, was 1.48 to 1. Additionally, AEM must maintain minimum
levels of net working capital and net worth ranging from
$75 million to $112.5 million. As defined in the
financial covenants, at December 31, 2008, AEMs net
working capital was $215.2 million and its tangible net
worth was $240.2 million.
To supplement borrowings under this facility, through
December 31, 2008, AEM had a $200 million intercompany
demand credit facility with AEH, which bore interest at the rate
for AEMs offshore borrowings under its committed credit
facility plus 0.75 percent. Amounts outstanding under this
facility are subordinated to AEMs committed credit
facility. There were no borrowings outstanding under this
facility at December 31, 2008. This facility was replaced
with another $200 million
364-day
facility in January 2009 with no material changes to its terms
except for the rate of interest, which is the greater of
(i) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 2.00 percent or
(ii) the rate for AEMs offshore borrowings under its
committed credit facility plus 0.75 percent.
Finally, through December 31, 2008, AEH had a
$200 million intercompany demand credit facility with AEC,
which bore interest at the rate for AEMs offshore
borrowings under its committed credit facility plus
0.75 percent. There were no borrowings outstanding under
this facility at December 31, 2008. This facility was
replaced with another $200 million
364-day
facility in January 2009 with no material changes to its terms
except for the rate of interest, which is the greater of
(i) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 2.00 percent or
(ii) the rate for AEMs offshore borrowings under its
committed credit facility plus 0.75 percent. Applicable
state regulatory commissions have approved the new facility
through December 31, 2009.
20
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Shelf
Registration
On December 4, 2006, we filed a registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue, from time
to time, up to $900 million in new common stock
and/or debt
securities. As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately
$450 million of availability remaining under the
registration statement. Due to certain restrictions placed by
one state regulatory commission on our ability to issue
securities under the registration statement, we are permitted to
issue a total of approximately $200 million of equity
securities and $250 million of senior debt securities. In
addition, due to restrictions imposed by another state
regulatory commission, if the credit ratings on our senior
unsecured debt were to fall below investment grade from either
Standard & Poors Corporation (BBB-),
Moodys Investors Services, Inc. (Baa3) or Fitch Ratings,
Ltd. (BBB-), our ability to issue any type of debt securities
under the registration statement would be suspended until we
received an investment grade rating from all of the three credit
rating agencies.
Debt
Covenants
In addition to the financial covenants described above, our debt
instruments contain various covenants that are usual and
customary for debt instruments of these types.
Additionally, our public debt indentures relating to our senior
notes and debentures, as well as our revolving credit
agreements, each contain a default provision that is triggered
if outstanding indebtedness arising out of any other credit
agreements in amounts ranging from in excess of $15 million
to in excess of $100 million becomes due by acceleration or
is not paid at maturity.
Further, AEMs credit agreement contains a cross-default
provision whereby AEM would be in default if it defaults on
other indebtedness, as defined, by at least $250 thousand in the
aggregate.
Finally, AEMs credit agreement contains a provision that
would limit the amount of credit available if Atmos Energy were
downgraded below an S&P rating of BBB and a Moodys
rating of Baa2. We have no other triggering events in our debt
instruments that are tied to changes in specified credit ratings
or stock price, nor have we entered into any transactions that
would require us to issue equity, based on our credit rating or
other triggering events.
We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of
December 31, 2008. If we were unable to comply with our
debt covenants, we may be required to repay our outstanding
balances on demand, provide additional collateral or take other
corrective actions.
21
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic income per share weighted
average common shares
|
|
|
90,471
|
|
|
|
89,006
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted and other shares
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted income per share weighted
average common shares
|
|
|
91,066
|
|
|
|
89,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were approximately 231,000 out-of-the-money options
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the three months ended December 31, 2008. There were no
out-of-the-money options excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 as their exercise price was less than the
average market price of the common stock during that period.
|
|
7.
|
Interim
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan
Information
|
The components of our net periodic pension cost for our pension
and other postretirement benefit plans for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented in the
following table. All of these costs are recoverable through our
gas distribution rates; however, a portion of these costs is
capitalized into our gas distribution rate base. The remaining
costs are recorded as a component of operation and maintenance
expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3,703
|
|
|
$
|
3,878
|
|
|
$
|
2,946
|
|
|
$
|
3,341
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
|
|
6,736
|
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(6,238
|
)
|
|
|
(6,310
|
)
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
Amortization of transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
5,791
|
|
|
$
|
6,059
|
|
|
$
|
6,271
|
|
|
$
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assumptions used to develop our net periodic pension cost
for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
7.57
|
%
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
7.57
|
%
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The discount rate used to compute the present value of a
plans liabilities generally is based on rates of
high-grade corporate bonds with maturities similar to the
average period over which the benefits will be paid. Generally,
our funding policy has been to contribute annually an amount in
accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974. In accordance with the Pension
Protection Act (PPA), we determined the funded status of our
plans as of January 1, 2009. Based upon this valuation, we
expect we will be required to contribute less than
$25 million to our pension plans by September 15, 2009.
We contributed $2.6 million to our other post-retirement
benefit plans during the three months ended December 31,
2008. We expect to contribute a total of approximately
$10 million to these plans during fiscal 2009.
|
|
8.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
and Environmental Matters
With respect to the specific litigation and
environmental-related matters or claims that were disclosed in
Note 12 to the financial statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, there were no
material changes in the status of such litigation and
environmental-related matters or claims during the three months
ended December 31, 2008. We continue to believe that the
final outcome of such litigation and environmental-related
matters or claims will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, we are involved in other litigation and
environmental-related matters or claims that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. While the ultimate results of
such litigation and response actions to such
environmental-related matters or claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, we believe the final outcome of such litigation and
response actions will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Purchase
Commitments
AEM has commitments to purchase physical quantities of natural
gas under contracts indexed to the forward NYMEX strip or fixed
price contracts. At December 31, 2008, AEM was committed to
purchase 77.6 Bcf within one year, 30.2 Bcf within one
to three years and 1.2 Bcf after three years under indexed
contracts. AEM is committed to purchase 1.6 Bcf within one
year under fixed price contracts with prices ranging from $4.14
to $13.20 per Mcf. Purchases under these contracts totaled
$527.5 million and $572.0 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Our natural gas distribution divisions, except for our Mid-Tex
Division, maintain supply contracts with several vendors that
generally cover a period of up to one year. Commitments for
estimated base gas volumes are established under these contracts
on a monthly basis at contractually negotiated prices.
Commitments for incremental daily purchases are made as
necessary during the month in accordance with the terms of the
individual contract.
23
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our Mid-Tex Division maintains long-term supply contracts to
ensure a reliable source of gas for our customers in its service
area which obligate it to purchase specified volumes at market
and fixed prices. The estimated commitments under these
contracts as of December 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
243,310
|
|
2010
|
|
|
90,146
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,006
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
360,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory
Matters
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we
concluded annual rate filing mechanisms we had filed in our
Mid-Tex and West Texas service areas. As of December 31,
2008, rate cases were in progress in our City of Dallas and
Tennessee service areas. These regulatory proceedings are
discussed in further detail in Managements Discussion
and Analysis Recent Ratemaking Developments.
|
|
9.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
Information regarding our concentration of credit risk is
disclosed in Note 14 to the financial statements in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. During the
three months ended December 31, 2008, there were no
material changes in our concentration of credit risk.
Atmos Energy and our subsidiaries are engaged primarily in the
regulated natural gas distribution, transmission and storage
business as well as other nonregulated businesses. We distribute
natural gas through sales and transportation arrangements to
approximately 3.2 million residential, commercial, public
authority and industrial customers through our six regulated
natural gas distribution divisions, which cover service areas
located in 12 states. In addition, we transport natural gas
for others through our distribution system.
Through our nonregulated businesses, we primarily provide
natural gas management and marketing services to municipalities,
other local distribution companies and industrial customers
primarily in the Midwest and Southeast. Additionally, we provide
natural gas transportation and storage services to certain of
our natural gas distribution operations and to third parties.
We operate the Company through the following four segments:
|
|
|
|
|
The natural gas distribution segment, which includes our
regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations.
|
|
|
|
The regulated transmission and storage segment, which
includes the regulated pipeline and storage operations of the
Atmos Pipeline Texas Division.
|
|
|
|
The natural gas marketing segment, which includes a
variety of nonregulated natural gas management services.
|
|
|
|
The pipeline, storage and other segment, which includes
our nonregulated natural gas transmission and storage services.
|
24
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our determination of reportable segments considers the strategic
operating units under which we manage sales of various products
and services to customers in differing regulatory environments.
Although our natural gas distribution segment operations are
geographically dispersed, they are reported as a single segment
as each natural gas distribution division has similar economic
characteristics. The accounting policies of the segments are the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies found in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. We evaluate
performance based on net income or loss of the respective
operating units.
Income statements for the three-month periods ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 by segment are presented in the
following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Regulated
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Transmission
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
and Storage
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external parties
|
|
$
|
1,055,772
|
|
|
$
|
30,222
|
|
|
$
|
616,844
|
|
|
$
|
13,494
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,716,332
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
24,460
|
|
|
|
170,651
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
(198,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055,968
|
|
|
|
54,682
|
|
|
|
787,495
|
|
|
|
16,448
|
|
|
|
(198,261
|
)
|
|
|
1,716,332
|
|
Purchased gas cost
|
|
|
757,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,472
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
(197,839
|
)
|
|
|
1,321,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
298,384
|
|
|
|
54,682
|
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
395,212
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
97,994
|
|
|
|
27,569
|
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
134,755
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
47,139
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,126
|
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
40,746
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
185,879
|
|
|
|
35,312
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
232,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
112,505
|
|
|
|
19,370
|
|
|
|
20,513
|
|
|
|
10,720
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
163,194
|
|
Miscellaneous income (expense)
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
(6,699
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
32,887
|
|
|
|
8,079
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
(6,613
|
)
|
|
|
38,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
82,739
|
|
|
|
12,106
|
|
|
|
16,912
|
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,902
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
4,445
|
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,133
|
|
|
$
|
7,661
|
|
|
$
|
10,575
|
|
|
$
|
7,594
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
89,003
|
|
|
$
|
5,060
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
13,275
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
107,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Regulated
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Transmission
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
and Storage
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external parties
|
|
$
|
928,029
|
|
|
$
|
22,437
|
|
|
$
|
702,722
|
|
|
$
|
4,322
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,657,510
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
22,609
|
|
|
|
137,995
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
(163,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,177
|
|
|
|
45,046
|
|
|
|
840,717
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
(163,157
|
)
|
|
|
1,657,510
|
|
Purchased gas cost
|
|
|
654,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794,754
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
(162,588
|
)
|
|
|
1,287,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273,200
|
|
|
|
45,046
|
|
|
|
45,963
|
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
369,638
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
97,247
|
|
|
|
15,432
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
121,189
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
42,832
|
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,513
|
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
35,618
|
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
175,697
|
|
|
|
22,792
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
211,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
97,503
|
|
|
|
22,254
|
|
|
|
34,699
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
158,509
|
|
Miscellaneous income (expense)
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
(3,567
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
31,214
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
(3,481
|
)
|
|
|
36,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
66,765
|
|
|
|
15,357
|
|
|
|
34,181
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,599
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
26,601
|
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
40,164
|
|
|
$
|
9,847
|
|
|
$
|
20,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,192
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
84,313
|
|
|
$
|
8,382
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balance sheet information at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 by segment is presented in the following
tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Regulated
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Transmission
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
and Storage
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,533,249
|
|
|
$
|
584,882
|
|
|
$
|
7,387
|
|
|
$
|
69,230
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,194,748
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
466,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464,347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
36,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,052
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,799
|
|
Assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,016
|
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
(25,549
|
)
|
|
|
40,075
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,151,129
|
|
|
|
27,029
|
|
|
|
413,676
|
|
|
|
62,728
|
|
|
|
(81,328
|
)
|
|
|
1,573,234
|
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
534,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,753
|
|
|
|
(677,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,723,056
|
|
|
|
27,029
|
|
|
|
486,744
|
|
|
|
230,905
|
|
|
|
(784,626
|
)
|
|
|
1,683,108
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
569,920
|
|
|
|
132,367
|
|
|
|
24,282
|
|
|
|
10,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,998
|
|
Noncurrent assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,214
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
13,233
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
166,669
|
|
|
|
6,718
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
14,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,459,356
|
|
|
$
|
750,996
|
|
|
$
|
532,315
|
|
|
$
|
325,249
|
|
|
$
|
(1,249,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,818,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,078,076
|
|
|
$
|
137,805
|
|
|
$
|
102,735
|
|
|
$
|
225,903
|
|
|
$
|
(466,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,078,076
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,719,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
3,797,472
|
|
|
|
137,805
|
|
|
|
102,735
|
|
|
|
226,427
|
|
|
|
(466,443
|
)
|
|
|
3,797,996
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,507
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
401,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,850
|
)
|
|
|
360,833
|
|
Liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
47,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,596
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
(25,549
|
)
|
|
|
53,432
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
863,569
|
|
|
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
291,154
|
|
|
|
78,442
|
|
|
|
(38,351
|
)
|
|
|
1,203,144
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535,064
|
|
|
|
142,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,712,700
|
|
|
|
543,394
|
|
|
|
464,435
|
|
|
|
79,886
|
|
|
|
(782,499
|
)
|
|
|
2,017,916
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
385,547
|
|
|
|
65,874
|
|
|
|
(35,664
|
)
|
|
|
15,598
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
431,324
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
|
|
|
305,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,784
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
253,968
|
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,459,356
|
|
|
$
|
750,996
|
|
|
$
|
532,315
|
|
|
$
|
325,249
|
|
|
$
|
(1,249,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,818,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
ATMOS
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Regulated
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Transmission
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Storage and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
and Storage
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,483,556
|
|
|
$
|
585,160
|
|
|
$
|
7,520
|
|
|
$
|
60,623
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,136,859
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
463,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
30,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120
|
|
|
|
6,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
Assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,008
|
|
|
|
20,239
|
|
|
|
(20,956
|
)
|
|
|
68,291
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
774,933
|
|
|
|
18,396
|
|
|
|
411,648
|
|
|
|
56,791
|
|
|
|
(91,672
|
)
|
|
|
1,170,096
|
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
578,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,795
|
|
|
|
(714,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,384,644
|
|
|
|
18,396
|
|
|
|
489,776
|
|
|
|
219,544
|
|
|
|
(827,256
|
)
|
|
|
1,285,104
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
569,920
|
|
|
|
132,367
|
|
|
|
24,282
|
|
|
|
10,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,998
|
|
Noncurrent assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
195,985
|
|
|
|
11,212
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
11,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,097,263
|
|
|
$
|
747,135
|
|
|
$
|
528,225
|
|
|
$
|
302,394
|
|
|
$
|
(1,288,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,386,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,052,492
|
|
|
$
|
130,144
|
|
|
$
|
114,559
|
|
|
$
|
218,455
|
|
|
$
|
(463,158
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,052,492
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,119,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,119,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
4,171,759
|
|
|
|
130,144
|
|
|
|
114,559
|
|
|
|
218,980
|
|
|
|
(463,158
|
)
|
|
|
4,172,284
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
385,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,550
|
)
|
|
|
350,542
|
|
Liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
58,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,688
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
(20,956
|
)
|
|
|
58,914
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
538,777
|
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
236,217
|
|
|
|
62,796
|
|
|
|
(47,997
|
)
|
|
|
796,846
|
|
Intercompany payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,384
|
|
|
|
171,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
982,935
|
|
|
|
550,437
|
|
|
|
434,649
|
|
|
|
64,197
|
|
|
|
(825,131
|
)
|
|
|
1,207,087
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
384,860
|
|
|
|
62,720
|
|
|
|
(21,936
|
)
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
441,302
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,369
|
|
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
|
|
|
298,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,645
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
253,953
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,097,263
|
|
|
$
|
747,135
|
|
|
$
|
528,225
|
|
|
$
|
302,394
|
|
|
$
|
(1,288,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,386,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Atmos Energy Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Atmos Energy Corporation as of December 31, 2008, and the
related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash
flows for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2008
and 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated
financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheet of Atmos Energy Corporation as of
September 30, 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated
November 18, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Dallas, Texas
February 3, 2009
29
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
and Managements Discussion and Analysis in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008.
Cautionary
Statement for the Purposes of the Safe Harbor under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All
statements other than statements of historical fact included in
this Report are forward-looking statements made in good faith by
us and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from
liability established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, or any other of
our documents or oral presentations, the words
anticipate, believe,
estimate, expect, forecast,
goal, intend, objective,
plan, projection, seek,
strategy or similar words are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
the statements relating to our strategy, operations, markets,
services, rates, recovery of costs, availability of gas supply
and other factors. These risks and uncertainties, which are
discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008, include the
following: our ability to continue to access the credit markets
to satisfy our liquidity requirements; the impact of recent
economic conditions on our customers; increased costs of
providing pension and postretirement health care benefits and
increased funding requirements; market risks beyond our control
affecting our risk management activities including market
liquidity, commodity price volatility, increasing interest rates
and counterparty creditworthiness; regulatory trends and
decisions, including the impact of rate proceedings before
various state regulatory commissions; increased federal
regulatory oversight and potential penalties; the impact of
environmental regulations on our business; the concentration of
our distribution, pipeline and storage operations in Texas;
adverse weather conditions; the effects of inflation and changes
in the availability and price of natural gas; the
capital-intensive nature of our gas distribution business;
increased competition from energy suppliers and alternative
forms of energy; the inherent hazards and risks involved in
operating our gas distribution business, natural disasters,
terrorist activities or other events; and other risks and
uncertainties discussed herein, all of which are difficult to
predict and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly,
while we believe these forward-looking statements to be
reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate
actual experience or that the expectations derived from them
will be realized. Further, we undertake no obligation to update
or revise any of our forward-looking statements whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Atmos Energy and our subsidiaries are engaged primarily in the
regulated natural gas distribution and transportation and
storage businesses as well as other nonregulated natural gas
businesses. We distribute natural gas through sales and
transportation arrangements to approximately 3.2 million
residential, commercial, public authority and industrial
customers throughout our six regulated natural gas distribution
divisions, which cover service areas located in 12 states.
In addition, we transport natural gas for others through our
distribution system.
Through our nonregulated businesses, we primarily provide
natural gas management and marketing services to municipalities,
other local gas distribution companies and industrial customers
primarily in the Midwest and Southeast and natural gas
transportation and storage services to certain of our natural
gas distribution divisions and to third parties.
30
We operate the Company through the following four segments:
|
|
|
|
|
the natural gas distribution segment, which includes our
regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations,
|
|
|
|
the regulated transmission and storage segment, which
includes the regulated pipeline and storage operations of the
Atmos Pipeline Texas Division,
|
|
|
|
the natural gas marketing segment, which includes a
variety of nonregulated natural gas management services and
|
|
|
|
the pipeline, storage and other segment, which is
comprised of our nonregulated natural gas gathering,
transmission and storage services.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
Our condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
and the related disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities. We based our estimates on historical experience and
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our
estimates, including those related to risk management and
trading activities, allowance for doubtful accounts, legal and
environmental accruals, insurance accruals, pension and
postretirement obligations, deferred income taxes and the
valuation of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and
other long-lived assets. Actual results may differ from such
estimates.
Our critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements are described in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
|
|
|
|
Impairment Assessments
|
|
|
|
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
|
Our critical accounting policies are reviewed quarterly by the
Audit Committee. There were no significant changes to these
critical accounting policies during the three months ended
December 31, 2008.
31
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents our consolidated financial
highlights for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,716,332
|
|
|
$
|
1,657,510
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
395,212
|
|
|
|
369,638
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
232,018
|
|
|
|
211,129
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
163,194
|
|
|
|
158,509
|
|
Miscellaneous expense
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
38,991
|
|
|
|
36,817
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
123,902
|
|
|
|
121,599
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
47,939
|
|
|
|
47,796
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
Our consolidated net income during the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was earned in each of our
business segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Natural gas distribution segment
|
|
$
|
50,133
|
|
|
$
|
40,164
|
|
|
$
|
9,969
|
|
Regulated transmission and storage segment
|
|
|
7,661
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
Natural gas marketing segment
|
|
|
10,575
|
|
|
|
20,600
|
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
Pipeline, storage and other segment
|
|
|
7,594
|
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables segregate our consolidated net income and
diluted earnings per share between our regulated and
nonregulated operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Regulated operations
|
|
$
|
57,794
|
|
|
$
|
50,011
|
|
|
$
|
7,783
|
|
Nonregulated operations
|
|
|
18,169
|
|
|
|
23,792
|
|
|
|
(5,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
|
$
|
75,963
|
|
|
$
|
73,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS from regulated operations
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Diluted EPS from nonregulated operations
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the results of our operations and other
significant events for the three months ended December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated operations generated 76 percent of our net income
during the three months ended December 31, 2008 compared to
68 percent during the three months ended December 31,
2007. The $7.8 million increase in our regulated operations
net income primarily reflects favorable ratemaking
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
activity coupled with higher transportation and priority
reservation fees, which were partially offset by an
11 percent increase in operating expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonregulated operations contributed 24 percent of net
income during the three months ended December 31, 2008
compared to 32 percent during the three months ended
December 31, 2007. The $5.6 million decrease in our
nonregulated operations net income primarily reflects a decrease
in unrealized margins partially offset by favorable asset
optimization margins.
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, we generated
$150.7 million in operating cash flow compared with
$61.4 million for the three months ended December 31,
2007, primarily reflecting the timing of accounts receivable
collections and purchases of gas stored underground.
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we entered into two new
364-day
committed credit facilities that will provide
$587.5 million to help fund our natural gas purchases and
working capital needs.
|
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2008 compared with Three Months
Ended December 31, 2007
Natural
Gas Distribution Segment
The primary factors that impact the results of our natural gas
distribution operations are our ability to earn our authorized
rates of return, the cost of natural gas, competitive factors in
the energy industry and economic conditions in our service areas.
Our ability to earn our authorized rates of return is based
primarily on our ability to improve the rate design in our
various ratemaking jurisdictions by reducing or eliminating
regulatory lag and, ultimately, separating the recovery of our
approved margins from customer usage patterns. Improving rate
design is a long-term process and is further complicated by the
fact that we operate in multiple rate jurisdictions.
Seasonal weather patterns can also affect our natural gas
distribution operations. However, the effect of weather that is
above or below normal is substantially offset through weather
normalization adjustments, known as WNA, which has been approved
by state regulatory commissions for approximately
90 percent of our residential and commercial meters in the
following states for the following time periods:
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
October May
|
Kansas
|
|
October May
|
Kentucky
|
|
November April
|
Louisiana
|
|
December March
|
Mississippi
|
|
November April
|
Tennessee
|
|
November April
|
Texas: Mid-Tex
|
|
November April
|
Texas: West Texas
|
|
October May
|
Virginia
|
|
January December
|
Our natural gas distribution operations are also affected by the
cost of natural gas. The cost of gas is passed through to our
customers without markup. Therefore, increases in the cost of
gas are offset by a corresponding increase in revenues.
Accordingly, we believe gross profit is a better indicator of
our financial performance than revenues. However, gross profit
in our Texas and Mississippi service areas include franchise
fees and gross receipts taxes, which are calculated as a
percentage of revenue (inclusive of gas costs). Therefore, the
amount of these taxes included in revenues is influenced by the
cost of gas and the level of gas sales volumes. We record the
associated tax expense as a component of taxes, other than
income. Although changes in revenue-related taxes arising from
changes in gas costs affect gross profit, over time the impact
is offset within operating income. Timing differences exist
between the recognition of revenue for franchise fees collected
from our customers and the recognition of expense of franchise
taxes. The effect of these timing differences can be significant
in periods of volatile gas prices, particularly in our Mid-Tex
Division. These timing differences may favorably or unfavorably
affect net income; however, these amounts should offset over
time with no permanent impact on net income.
33
Beginning January 1, 2009, changes in our franchise fee
agreements will become effective that should significantly
reduce the impact of this timing difference on a prospective
basis.
Higher gas costs may also adversely impact our accounts
receivable collections, resulting in higher bad debt expense and
may require us to increase borrowings under our credit
facilities resulting in higher interest expense. Finally, higher
gas costs, as well as competitive factors in the industry and
general economic conditions may cause customers to conserve or
use alternative energy sources.
Review of
Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our natural gas
distribution segment for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
298,384
|
|
|
$
|
273,200
|
|
|
$
|
25,184
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
185,879
|
|
|
|
175,697
|
|
|
|
10,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
112,505
|
|
|
|
97,503
|
|
|
|
15,002
|
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
32,887
|
|
|
|
31,214
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
82,739
|
|
|
|
66,765
|
|
|
|
15,974
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
26,601
|
|
|
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,133
|
|
|
$
|
40,164
|
|
|
$
|
9,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated natural gas distribution sales volumes
MMcf
|
|
|
91,446
|
|
|
|
84,767
|
|
|
|
6,679
|
|
Consolidated natural gas distribution transportation
volumes MMcf
|
|
|
34,336
|
|
|
|
33,749
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated natural gas distribution
throughput MMcf
|
|
|
125,782
|
|
|
|
118,516
|
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated natural gas distribution average transportation
revenue per Mcf
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Consolidated natural gas distribution average cost of gas per
Mcf sold
|
|
$
|
8.28
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
The following table shows our operating income by natural gas
distribution division for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007. The presentation of our natural
gas distribution operating income is included for financial
reporting purposes and may not be appropriate for ratemaking
purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Mid-Tex
|
|
$
|
52,678
|
|
|
$
|
50,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,453
|
|
Kentucky/Mid-States
|
|
|
19,025
|
|
|
|
14,168
|
|
|
|
4,857
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
14,584
|
|
|
|
11,932
|
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
West Texas
|
|
|
8,013
|
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
8,435
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Colorado-Kansas
|
|
|
8,601
|
|
|
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
1,913
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
112,505
|
|
|
$
|
97,503
|
|
|
$
|
15,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The $25.2 million increase in natural gas distribution
gross profit primarily reflects a $15.3 million increase in
rates. The net increase in rates primarily was attributable to
the Mid-Tex Division, which increased $11.3 million as a
result of the implementation of its 2008 Rate Review Mechanism
(RRM) filing with all incorporated cities in the division other
than the City of Dallas (the Settled Cities). The current year
period also reflects $4.0 million in rate adjustments
primarily in Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana and West Texas. In
addition, the increase in gross profit reflects a six percent
increase in distribution throughput. Finally, gross profit
increased $8.1 million compared with the prior-year quarter
due to a non-recurring update to our estimate for gas delivered
to customers but not yet billed to reflect changes in base rates
in several of our jurisdictions.
Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease of
approximately $0.3 million in revenue-related taxes
primarily due to lower revenues, on which the tax is calculated,
in the current-year quarter compared to the prior-year quarter.
This decrease, combined with an $8.1 million
quarter-over-quarter increase in the associated franchise and
state gross receipts tax expense recorded as a component of
taxes other than income, resulted in an $8.4 million
decrease in operating income when compared with the prior-year
quarter.
Operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance
expense, provision for doubtful accounts, depreciation and
amortization expense and taxes, other than income, increased
$10.2 million.
Operation and maintenance expense, excluding the provision for
doubtful accounts, increased $2.2 million, primarily due to
a $2.1 million noncash charge to impair certain
available-for-sale investments due to the recent deterioration
of the financial markets.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$4.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared
with first quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase primarily was
attributable to additional assets placed in service during the
current-year period.
Interest charges allocated to the natural gas distribution
segment increased $1.7 million due to higher average
short-term debt balances, interest rates and commitment fees
experienced during the current-year quarter compared to the
prior-year quarter. These increases are associated with the
recent adverse conditions in the credit markets.
Recent
Ratemaking Developments
Significant ratemaking developments that occurred during the
three months ended December 31, 2008 are discussed below.
The amounts described below represent the gross revenues that
were requested or received in each rate filing, which may not
necessarily reflect the increase in operating income obtained,
as certain operating costs may have increased as a result of a
commissions final ruling.
Annual
Rate Filing Mechanisms
In April 2008, the Mid-Tex Division filed its first RRM with the
Settled Cities. The filing requested an increase in rates of
$33.3 million on a system-wide basis, of which
$26.7 million applied to the Settled Cities. We reached an
agreement with representatives of the Settled Cities to increase
rates $20.0 million on a system-wide basis, which were
implemented beginning in November 2008. The impact to the
Mid-Tex Division for the Settled Cities is approximately
$16.0 million.
In the West Texas Division, the Company reached an agreement
with representatives of the West Texas Cities with respect to
its RRM filing to increase rates a total of $3.9 million.
The $3.9 million will be collected through the
true-up
portion of the RRM tariff rates over a
91/2
month period beginning in November 2008.
In May 2008, the City of Lubbock approved its Conservation and
Customer Value Plan (CCVP), which contained an annual rate
review mechanism that would adjust rates to reflect changes in
the West Texas Divisions cost of service and rate base.
The West Texas Division filed its annual review filing under the
CCVP in June 2008. The Company and city officials were unable to
reach a mutually agreeable settlement,
35
and in December 2008, the City Council passed an ordinance
withdrawing the CCVP tariff. The Company is currently evaluating
it options.
In December 2008, we filed our TransLa annual rate
stabilization clause with the Louisiana Public Service
Commission requesting an increase of $0.9 million. The
filing was for the test year ended September 30, 2008. We
anticipate final resolution of this proceeding by March 2009.
In September 2008, we filed our Mississippi stable rate filing
with the Mississippi Public Service Commission (MPSC) requesting
an increase of $3.5 million. In January 2009, we withdrew
this request after we were unable to reach a mutually agreeable
settlement with the MPSC.
GRIP
Filings
In May 2008, the Mid-Tex Division made a GRIP filing seeking a
$10.3 million increase on a system-wide basis. However,
this filing is only applicable to the City of Dallas and the
Mid-Tex environs and seeks a $1.8 million increase for
customers in those service areas only. Rates were approved for
this filing in December 2008 and will be implemented in February
2009.
Rate Case
Filings
In October 2008, our Kentucky/Mid-States Division filed a rate
case with the Tennessee Regulatory Authority seeking a rate
increase of $6.3 million. The filing includes a rate base
of approximately $191.0 million, a 50/50 capital structure
and requests an authorized return on equity of
11.7 percent. We are currently working through discovery on
the case. In January 2009, the Consumer Advocate and Protection
Division recommended a decrease in rates of $3.7 million.
Any adjustment to rates is expected to be implemented no later
than April 2009.
In November 2008, the Mid-Tex Division filed a statement of
intent to increase rates for customers within the City of Dallas
by $9.1 million. The City of Dallas suspended the filing on
December 10, 2008 and is expected to take final action on
the filing by the end of February 2009.
Other
Ratemaking Activity
In May 2007, our Mid-Tex Division filed for a
36-month gas
contract review filing. This filing is mandated by prior
Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) orders and relates to the
prudency of gas purchases made from November 2003 through
October 2006, which total approximately $2.7 billion. The
intervening parties recommended disallowances ranging from
$58 million to $89 million. A hearing was held at the
RRC in September 2008. In December 2008, a proposal for decision
was issued by the Hearing Examiner recommending no gas cost
disallowance. The RRC is expected to render it decision in
February 2009.
Regulated
Transmission and Storage Segment
Our regulated transmission and storage segment consists of the
regulated pipeline and storage operations of the Atmos
Pipeline Texas Division. The Atmos
Pipeline Texas Division transports natural gas to
our Mid-Tex Division and third parties and manages five
underground storage reservoirs in Texas. We also provide
ancillary services customary in the pipeline industry including
parking and lending arrangements and sales of inventory on hand.
Similar to our natural gas distribution segment, our regulated
transmission and storage segment is impacted by seasonal weather
patterns, competitive factors in the energy industry and
economic conditions in our service areas. Further, as the Atmos
Pipeline Texas Division operations supply all of the
natural gas for our Mid-Tex Division, the results of this
segment are highly dependent upon the natural gas requirements
of the Mid-Tex Division. Finally, as a regulated pipeline, the
operations of the Atmos Pipeline Texas Division may
be impacted by the timing of when costs and expenses are
incurred and when these costs and expenses are recovered through
its tariffs.
36
Review of
Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our regulated
transmission and storage segment for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Mid-Tex transportation
|
|
$
|
24,352
|
|
|
$
|
22,388
|
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
Third-party transportation
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
|
|
7,134
|
|
Storage and park and lend services
|
|
|
2,357
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,682
|
|
|
|
45,046
|
|
|
|
9,636
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
35,312
|
|
|
|
22,792
|
|
|
|
12,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19,370
|
|
|
|
22,254
|
|
|
|
(2,884
|
)
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
8,079
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,106
|
|
|
|
15,357
|
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,445
|
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,661
|
|
|
$
|
9,847
|
|
|
$
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross pipeline transportation volumes MMcf
|
|
|
192,172
|
|
|
|
188,864
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pipeline transportation volumes MMcf
|
|
|
135,858
|
|
|
|
136,200
|
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $9.6 million increase in gross profit primarily was
attributable to a $3.7 million increase resulting from
higher transportation fees on through-system deliveries due to
market conditions and a $3.3 million increase from higher
priority reservation fees. The improvement in gross profit also
reflects a $1.4 million increase due to our 2006 and 2007
GRIP filings. Throughput was flat as increased city-gate,
electrical generation and HUB deliveries offset decreased
Barnett Shale receipts and industrial deliveries.
Operating expenses increased $12.5 million primarily due to
increased employee and pipeline maintenance costs.
Natural
Gas Marketing Segment
Our natural gas marketing activities are conducted through Atmos
Energy Marketing, LLC (AEM). AEM aggregates and purchases gas
supply, arranges transportation
and/or
storage logistics and ultimately delivers gas to our customers
at competitive prices. To facilitate this process, we utilize
proprietary and customer-owned transportation and storage assets
to provide the various services our customers request, including
furnishing natural gas supplies at fixed and market-based
prices, contract negotiation and administration, load
forecasting, gas storage acquisition and management services,
transportation services, peaking sales and balancing services,
capacity utilization strategies and gas price hedging through
the use of financial instruments. As a result, our revenues
arise from the types of commercial transactions we have
structured with our customers and include the value we extract
by optimizing the storage and transportation capacity we own or
control as well as revenues received for services we deliver.
Our asset optimization activities seek to maximize the economic
value associated with the storage and transportation capacity we
own or control. We attempt to meet this objective by engaging in
natural gas storage transactions in which we seek to find and
profit from the pricing differences that occur over time. We
purchase physical natural gas and then sell financial
instruments at advantageous prices to lock in a gross profit
margin. We also seek to participate in transactions in which we
combine the natural gas commodity and transportation costs to
minimize our costs incurred to serve our customers by
identifying the lowest cost
37
alternative within the natural gas supplies, transportation and
markets to which we have access. Through the use of
transportation and storage services and financial instruments,
we also seek to capture gross profit margin through the
arbitrage of pricing differences that exist in various locations
and by recognizing pricing differences that occur over time.
AEM continually manages its net physical position to attempt to
increase in the future the potential economic gross profit that
was created when the original transaction was executed.
Therefore, AEM may subsequently change its originally scheduled
storage injection and withdrawal plans from one time period to
another based on market conditions and recognize any associated
gains or losses at that time. If AEM elects to accelerate the
withdrawal of physical gas, it will execute new financial
instruments to hedge the original financial instruments. If AEM
elects to defer the withdrawal of gas, it will reset its
financial instruments by settling the original financial
instruments and executing new financial instruments to
correspond to the revised withdrawal schedule.
We use financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges,
to hedge our natural gas inventory used in our natural gas
marketing storage activities. These financial instruments are
marked to market each month based upon the NYMEX price with
changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains and losses
in the period of change. The hedged natural gas inventory is
marked to market at the end of each month based on the Gas Daily
index with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains
and losses in the period of change. Changes in the spreads
between the forward natural gas prices used to value the
financial hedges designated against our physical inventory and
the market (spot) prices used to value our physical storage
result in unrealized margins until the underlying physical gas
is withdrawn and the related financial instruments are settled.
Once the gas is withdrawn and the financial instruments are
settled, the previously unrealized margins associated with these
net positions are realized.
AEM also uses financial instruments to capture additional
storage arbitrage opportunities that may arise after the
execution of the original physical inventory hedge and to
attempt to insulate and protect the economic value within its
asset optimization activities. Changes in fair value associated
with these financial instruments are recognized as a component
of unrealized margins until they are settled.
Review of
Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our natural gas
marketing segment for the three months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 are presented below. Gross profit margin consists
primarily of margins earned from the delivery of gas and related
services requested by our customers and margins earned from
asset optimization activities, which are derived from the
utilization of our proprietary and managed third-party storage
and transportation assets to capture favorable arbitrage spreads
through natural gas trading activities.
Unrealized margins represent the unrealized gains or losses on
our net physical gas position and the related financial
instruments used to manage commodity price risk as described
above. These margins fluctuate based upon changes in the spreads
between the physical (spot) and forward natural gas prices.
Generally, if the physical/financial spread narrows, we will
record unrealized gains or lower unrealized losses. If the
physical/financial spread widens, we will record unrealized
losses or lower unrealized gains. The magnitude of the
unrealized gains and losses is also contingent upon the levels
of our net physical position at the end of the reporting period.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Realized margins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered gas
|
|
$
|
18,553
|
|
|
$
|
18,173
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
Asset optimization
|
|
|
36,939
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
37,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,492
|
|
|
|
17,648
|
|
|
|
37,844
|
|
Unrealized margins
|
|
|
(25,469
|
)
|
|
|
28,315
|
|
|
|
(53,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
|
|
45,963
|
|
|
|
(15,940
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
(1,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
20,513
|
|
|
|
34,699
|
|
|
|
(14,186
|
)
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
16,912
|
|
|
|
34,181
|
|
|
|
(17,269
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
(7,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,575
|
|
|
$
|
20,600
|
|
|
$
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross natural gas marketing sales volumes MMcf
|
|
|
110,658
|
|
|
|
108,709
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated natural gas marketing sales volumes MMcf
|
|
|
93,308
|
|
|
|
96,206
|
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net physical position (Bcf)
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $15.9 million decrease in our natural gas marketing
segments gross profit primarily was driven by a
$53.8 million decrease in unrealized margins. This decrease
primarily reflects the recognition of previously unrecognized
margins in realized margins, as a result of cycling more gas
from storage and settlement of the corresponding financial
instruments. This decrease was partially offset by a smaller
widening during the current quarter compared with the prior-year
quarter of the spreads between current cash prices and forward
natural gas prices as cash prices have declined more rapidly
than prices for the forward delivery months.
The decrease in unrealized margins was partially offset by a
$37.5 million increase in asset optimization margins. In
the prior year, as a result of a less volatile natural gas
market, AEM elected to defer storage withdrawals and reset the
corresponding financial instruments to increase the potential
gross profit it could realize in future periods from its asset
optimization activities. During the quarter, AEM realized
substantially all of the gains it had captured as a result of
deferring storage in prior periods as the storage was withdrawn
and the corresponding financial instruments were settled.
In addition, the decrease in gross profit generated from
unrealized margins was also partially offset by a
$0.4 million increase in realized delivered gas margins.
The increase was largely attributable to higher gross sales
volumes combined with slightly higher
per-unit
margins, compared with the prior-year quarter.
Operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance
expense, provision for doubtful accounts, depreciation and
amortization expense and taxes, other than income taxes,
decreased $1.8 million primarily due to the absence in the
current year of $2.4 million related to tax matters
incurred in the prior-year quarter partially offset by an
increase in employee and other administrative costs.
Economic
Gross Profit
AEM monitors the impact of its asset optimization efforts by
estimating the gross profit, before associated storage fees,
that it captured through the purchase and sale of physical
natural gas and the execution of the
39
associated financial instruments. This economic gross profit,
combined with the effect of the future reversal of unrealized
gains or losses currently recognized in the income statement is
referred to as the potential gross
profit.(1)
The following table presents AEMs economic gross profit
and its potential gross profit at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Physical
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Potential Gross
|
|
Period Ending
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
(Bcf)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
$
|
36.4
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Potential gross profit represents the increase in AEMs
gross profit in future periods if its optimization efforts are
executed as planned. This amount does not include storage and
other operating expenses and increased income taxes that will be
incurred to realize this amount. Therefore, it does not
represent an estimated increase in future net income. There is
no assurance that the economic gross profit or the potential
gross profit will be fully realized in the future. We consider
this measure a non-GAAP financial measure as it is calculated
using both forward-looking storage injection/withdrawal and
hedge settlement estimates and historical financial information.
This measure is presented because we believe it provides our
investors a more comprehensive view of our asset optimization
efforts and thus a better understanding of these activities than
would be presented by GAAP measures alone. |
As of December 31, 2008, based upon AEMs planned
inventory withdrawal schedule and associated planned settlement
of financial instruments, the economic gross profit was
$20.7 million. This amount will be reduced by
$4.8 million of net unrealized gains recorded in the
financial statements as of December 31, 2008 that will
reverse when the inventory is withdrawn and the accompanying
financial instruments are settled. Therefore, the potential
gross profit was $15.9 million at December 31, 2008.
The $3.8 million increase in potential gross profit as
compared to September 30, 2008, is comprised of a
$31.6 million decrease in unrealized gains and an
unfavorable movement in the market prices used to value our
natural gas storage inventory, partially offset by a
$27.8 million decrease in the economic gross profit,
principally due to the withdrawal of physical inventory and the
realization of financial instruments settled during the period.
During this process, AEM increased its net physical position
8.3 Bcf; however, the captured spreads were lower than in
prior periods.
The economic gross profit is based upon planned storage
injection and withdrawal schedules and its realization is
contingent upon the execution of this plan, weather and other
execution factors. Since AEM actively manages and optimizes its
portfolio to attempt to enhance the future profitability of its
storage position, it may change its scheduled storage injection
and withdrawal plans from one time period to another based on
market conditions. Therefore, we cannot ensure that the economic
gross profit or the potential gross profit calculated as of
December 31, 2008 will be fully realized in the future nor
can we predict in what time periods such realization may occur.
Further, if we experience operational or other issues which
limit our ability to optimally manage our stored gas positions,
our earnings could be adversely impacted. Assuming AEM fully
executes its plan in place on December 31, 2008, without
encountering operational or other issues, we anticipate that
approximately half of the potential gross profit as of
December 31, 2008 will be recognized during the second
quarter of fiscal 2009.
Pipeline,
Storage and Other Segment
Our pipeline, storage and other segment primarily consists of
the operations of Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC (APS) and
Atmos Power Systems, Inc., which are each wholly owned by Atmos
Energy Holdings, Inc.
APS owns or has an interest in underground storage fields in
Kentucky and Louisiana. We use these storage facilities to
reduce the need to contract for additional pipeline capacity to
meet customer demand during peak periods. Additionally,
beginning in fiscal 2006, APS initiated activities in the
natural gas gathering business. As of December 31, 2008,
these activities did not represent a significant portion of this
segments operations.
40
Through Atmos Power Systems, Inc., we have constructed electric
peaking power-generating plants and associated facilities and
lease these plants through lease agreements that are accounted
for as sales under generally accepted accounting principles.
Results for this segment are primarily impacted by seasonal
weather patterns and volatility in the natural gas markets.
Additionally, this segments results include an unrealized
component as APS hedges its risk associated with its asset
optimization activities.
Review of
Financial and Operating Results
Financial and operational highlights for our pipeline, storage
and other segment for the three months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Storage and transportation services
|
|
$
|
2,988
|
|
|
$
|
2,981
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Asset optimization
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
Unrealized margins
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,545
|
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
|
|
6,547
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,720
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Interest charges
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,594
|
|
|
$
|
3,192
|
|
|
$
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit from our pipeline, storage and other segment
increased $6.5 million primarily due to a $4.6 million
increase in asset optimization margins as a result of strong
transportation margins earned on excess pipeline capacity under
certain asset management agreements in the current-year period
coupled with a sale of inventory in the quarter.
Operating expenses for the three months ended December 31,
2008 were consistent with the prior-year quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The liquidity required to fund our working capital, capital
expenditures and other cash needs is provided from a variety of
sources including internally generated funds and borrowings
under our commercial paper program and bank credit facilities.
Additionally, we have various uncommitted trade credit lines
with our gas suppliers that we utilize to purchase natural gas
on a monthly basis. Finally, from time to time, we raise funds
from the public debt and equity capital markets to fund our
liquidity needs.
The primary means we use to fund our working capital needs and
growth is to utilize internally generated funds and to access
the commercial paper markets. Recent adverse developments in
global financial and credit markets have made it more difficult
and more expensive for the Company to access the short-term
capital markets, including the commercial paper market, to
satisfy our liquidity requirements. Consequently, during the
quarter, we experienced higher than normal borrowings under our
five-year credit facility used to backstop our commercial paper
program in lieu of commercial paper borrowings to fund our
working capital needs. At December 31, 2008, the total
amount used under this facility was $360.8 million and
$205.9 million was available. However, subsequent to
quarter end, credit market conditions have improved, both as to
availability
41
and interest rates, and we have been able to obtain sufficient
levels of commercial paper to substantially reduce direct
borrowings on this facility.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we strengthened the
sources of our liquidity with the execution of two new committed
credit facilities. In October 2008, we replaced our former
$300 million
364-day
committed credit facility with a new facility that will allow
borrowings up to $212.5 million and expires in October
2009. In December 2008, we converted AEMs former
$580 million uncommitted credit facility to a
$375 million committed credit facility that will expire in
December 2009. As a result of executing these new agreements, we
have a total of $1.2 billion available to us under four
committed credit facilities. As of December 31, 2008, the
amount available to us under our credit facilities, net of
outstanding letters of credit, was approximately
$614 million.
Our $18 million unsecured committed credit facility expires
in March 2009. We are working to renew this credit facility and
we believe these renewal efforts will be successful.
Additionally, our $400 million 4.00% unsecured senior notes
will mature in October 2009. We are currently evaluating
alternatives to finance this debt, and we believe we will be
able to successfully refinance these notes.
We believe the liquidity provided by our committed credit
facilities, combined with our operating cash flows, will be
sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital
expenditure program for the remainder of fiscal 2009.
Cash
Flows
Our internally generated funds may change in the future due to a
number of factors, some of which we cannot control. These
include regulatory changes, prices for our products and
services, demand for such products and services, margin
requirements resulting from significant changes in commodity
prices, operational risks and other factors.
Cash
flows from operating activities
Period-over-period changes in our operating cash flows primarily
are attributable to changes in net income and working capital
changes, particularly within our natural gas distribution
segment resulting from the price of natural gas and the timing
of customer collections, payments for natural gas purchases and
deferred gas cost recoveries.
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, we generated
operating cash flow of $150.7 million from operating
activities compared with $61.4 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2007. Period over period, the
$89.3 million increase primarily was attributable to
favorable changes in accounts receivable and gas stored
underground, which increased operating cash flow by
$83.9 million. These changes reflect improved timing of
accounts receivable collections and purchases of natural gas to
fill our storage facilities.
Cash
flows from investing activities
In recent years, a substantial portion of our cash resources has
been used to fund growth projects, our ongoing construction
program and improvements to information technology systems. Our
ongoing construction program enables us to provide natural gas
distribution services to our existing customer base, expand our
natural gas distribution services into new markets, enhance the
integrity of our pipelines and, more recently, expand our
intrastate pipeline network. In executing our current rate
strategy, we are directing discretionary capital spending to
jurisdictions that permit us to earn a timely return on our
investment. Currently, our Mid-Tex, Louisiana, Mississippi and
West Texas natural gas distribution divisions and our Atmos
Pipeline Texas Division have rate designs that
provide the opportunity to include in their rate base approved
capital costs on a periodic basis without being required to file
a rate case.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 are expected to range from
$500 million to $515 million. For the three months
ended December 31, 2008, capital expenditures were
$107.4 million compared with $94.2 million for the
three months ended December 31, 2007. The increase in
capital spending primarily reflects spending
42
for nonregulated growth projects and increased levels of
regulatory compliance-related spending in the Mid-Tex Division.
Cash
flows from financing activities
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, our financing
activities reflected a use of cash of $19.1 million. For
the three months ended December 31, 2007, financing
activities provided $25.7 million. Our significant
financing activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we
increased our borrowings by a net $5.3 million under our
short-term credit facilities compared with $50.7 million in
the prior-year quarter. The reduction in the net borrowings
reflects the timing of the use of our line of credit to finance
natural gas purchases and working capital.
|
|
|
|
We repaid $0.3 million of long-term debt during the three
months ended December 31, 2008 compared with
$1.7 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2007. Payments in both periods reflected
regularly scheduled payments in accordance with our various debt
agreements.
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we paid
$30.2 million in cash dividends compared with
$29.2 million for the three months ended December 31,
2007. The increase in dividends paid over the prior-year period
reflects the increase in our dividend rate from $0.325 per share
during the three months ended December 31, 2007 to $0.33
per share during the three months ended December 31, 2008
combined with new share issuances under our various equity plans.
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we issued
0.3 million shares of common stock under our various equity
plans, which generated net proceeds of $6.1 million. In
addition, we granted 0.5 million shares of common stock
under our 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
The following table summarizes our share issuances for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
108,582
|
|
|
|
95,891
|
|
Retirement Savings Plan and Trust
|
|
|
155,195
|
|
|
|
140,071
|
|
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
520,124
|
|
|
|
343,673
|
|
Outside Directors Stock-for-Fee Plan
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares issued
|
|
|
784,812
|
|
|
|
580,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Facilities
Our short-term borrowing requirements are affected by the
seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Changes in the
price of natural gas and the amount of natural gas we need to
supply to meet our customers needs could significantly
affect our borrowing requirements. However, our short-term
borrowings reach their highest levels in the winter months.
We finance our short-term borrowing requirements through a
combination of a $600 million commercial paper program and
four committed revolving credit facilities with third-party
lenders that provide $1.2 billion of working capital
funding. As of December 31, 2008, the amount available to
us under our credit facilities, net of outstanding letters of
credit, was approximately $614 million. These facilities
are described in further detail in Note 5 to the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
43
Shelf
Registration
On December 4, 2006, we filed a registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue, from time
to time, up to $900 million in new common stock
and/or debt
securities. As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately
$450 million available for issuance under the registration
statement. Due to certain restrictions imposed by one state
regulatory commission on our ability to issue securities under
the registration statement, we are permitted to issue a total of
approximately $200 million of equity securities and
$250 million of senior debt securities. In addition, due to
restrictions imposed by another state regulatory commission, if
the credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt were to fall
below investment grade from either Standard &
Poors Corporation (BBB-), Moodys Investors Services,
Inc. (Baa3) or Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (BBB-), our ability to issue
any type of debt securities under the registration statement
would be suspended until an investment grade rating from all
three credit rating agencies was achieved.
Credit
Ratings
Our credit ratings directly affect our ability to obtain
short-term and long-term financing, in addition to the cost of
such financing. In determining our credit ratings, the rating
agencies consider a number of quantitative factors, including
debt to total capitalization, operating cash flow relative to
outstanding debt, operating cash flow coverage of interest and
pension liabilities and funding status. In addition, the rating
agencies consider qualitative factors such as consistency of our
earnings over time, the quality of our management and business
strategy, the risks associated with our regulated and
nonregulated businesses and the regulatory structures that
govern our rates in the states where we operate.
Our debt is rated by three rating agencies: Standard &
Poors Corporation (S&P), Moodys Investors
Service (Moodys) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (Fitch). In
December 2008, S&P upgraded our credit rating from BBB to
BBB+ and affirmed a stable outlook. S&P cited improved
financial performance and rate case decisions that have
increased cash flow as the key drivers for the upgrade.
Additionally, in January 2009, Moodys changed our rating
outlook from stable to positive. Fitch still maintains its
stable outlook. Our current debt ratings are all considered
investment grade and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
|
Unsecured senior long-term debt
|
|
|
BBB+
|
|
|
|
Baa3
|
|
|
|
BBB+
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
P-3
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
None of our ratings are currently under review. However, a
significant degradation in our operating performance, a
significant reduction in our liquidity caused by more limited
access to the private and public credit markets as a result of
the recent adverse global financial and credit conditions or our
inability to refinance on a timely basis our $400 million
4.00% unsecured senior notes maturing in October 2009 could
trigger a negative change in our ratings outlook or even a
reduction in our credit ratings by the three credit rating
agencies. This would mean even more limited access to the
private and public credit markets and an increase in the costs
of such borrowings.
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities. The highest investment grade credit rating for
S&P is AAA, Moodys is Aaa and Fitch is AAA. The
lowest investment grade credit rating for S&P is BBB-,
Moodys is Baa3 and Fitch is BBB-. Our credit ratings may
be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies, and
each rating should be evaluated independent of any other rating.
There can be no assurance that a rating will remain in effect
for any given period of time or that a rating will not be
lowered, or withdrawn entirely, by a rating agency if, in its
judgment, circumstances so warrant.
Debt
Covenants
We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of
December 31, 2008. Our debt covenants are described in
greater detail in Note 5 to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
44
Capitalization
The following table presents our capitalization as of
December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
360,833
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
350,542
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
202,244
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,120,427
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,120,577
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,128,533
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,078,076
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
%
|
|
|
2,052,492
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,032,483
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
4,559,336
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,523,611
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,363,260
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, including
short-term debt, was 54.4 percent at December 31,
2008, 54.6 percent at September 30, 2008 and
53.4 percent at December 31, 2007. Our ratio of total
debt to capitalization is typically greater during the winter
heating season as we incur short-term debt to fund natural gas
purchases and meet our working capital requirements. We intend
to maintain our debt to capitalization ratio in a target range
of 50 to 55 percent through cash flow generated from
operations, continued issuance of new common stock under our
Direct Stock Purchase Plan and Retirement Savings Plan and
access to the equity capital markets.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Significant commercial commitments are described in Note 8
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
There were no significant changes in our contractual obligations
and commercial commitments during the three months ended
December 31, 2008.
In February 2008, Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC announced
plans to construct and operate a salt-cavern gas storage project
in Franklin Parish, Louisiana. The project, located near several
large interstate pipelines, includes the development of three
5 billion cubic feet (Bcf) caverns for a total of
15 Bcf of working gas storage, with six-turn injection and
withdrawal capacity. We have drilled a test well and are
currently evaluating the results. Additionally, we have
submitted a pre-filing request with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct and operate the
project. We expect approval of this request in the third quarter
of fiscal 2009. Finally, we have engaged the services of an
investment bank to assist us in determining the optimal
ownership
and/or
development alternatives with respect to this project.
Risk
Management Activities
We conduct risk management activities through our natural gas
distribution, natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and
other segments. In our natural gas distribution segment, we use
a combination of physical storage, fixed physical contracts and
fixed financial contracts to reduce our exposure to unusually
large winter-period gas price increases.
In our natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and other
segments, we manage our exposure to the risk of natural gas
price changes and lock in our gross profit margin through a
combination of storage and financial instruments, including
futures, over-the-counter and exchange-traded options and swap
contracts with counterparties. To the extent our inventory cost
and actual sales and actual purchases do not correlate with the
changes in the market indices we use in our hedges, we could
experience ineffectiveness or the hedges may no longer meet the
accounting requirements for hedge accounting, resulting in the
financial instruments being treated as mark to market
instruments through earnings.
45
The following table shows the components of the change in fair
value of our natural gas distribution segments financial
instruments for the three months ended December 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(63,677
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,053
|
)
|
Contracts realized/settled
|
|
|
(53,766
|
)
|
|
|
(22,338
|
)
|
Fair value of new contracts
|
|
|
(3,223
|
)
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
Other changes in value
|
|
|
69,352
|
|
|
|
23,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts at end of period
|
|
$
|
(51,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of our natural gas distribution segments
financial instruments at December 31, 2008 is presented
below by time period and fair value source:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Contracts at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Maturity in Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
Source of Fair Value
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
than 5
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Prices actively quoted
|
|
$
|
(47,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51,314
|
)
|
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
$
|
(47,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the components of the change in fair
value of our natural gas marketing segments financial
instruments for the three months ended December 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
16,542
|
|
|
$
|
26,808
|
|
Contracts realized/settled
|
|
|
(20,247
|
)
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
Fair value of new contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in value
|
|
|
(24,893
|
)
|
|
|
19,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts at end of period
|
|
|
(28,598
|
)
|
|
|
51,859
|
|
Netting of cash collateral
|
|
|
75,825
|
|
|
|
(30,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collateral and fair value of contracts at period end
|
|
$
|
47,227
|
|
|
$
|
21,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of our natural gas marketing segments
financial instruments at December 31, 2008 is presented
below by time period and fair value source:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Contracts at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Maturity in Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
Source of Fair Value
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
than 5
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Prices actively quoted
|
|
$
|
(41,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(28,598
|
)
|
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
$
|
(41,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(28,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Pension
and Postretirement Benefits Obligations
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted the
requirement under SFAS 158, Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),
that the measurement date used to determine our projected
benefit and postretirement obligations and net periodic pension
and postretirement costs must correspond to a fiscal year end.
In accordance with the transition rules, the impact of changing
the measurement date from June 30, 2008 to
September 30, 2008 decreased retained earnings by
$7.8 million, net of tax, decreased the unrecognized
actuarial loss by $9.0 million and increased our
postretirement liabilities by $3.5 million.
Further, our fiscal 2009 costs were determined using a
September 30, 2008 measurement date. As of
September 30, 2008, interest and corporate bond rates
utilized to determine our discount rates, were significantly
higher than the interest and corporate bond rates as of
June 30, 2007, the measurement date for our fiscal
2008 net periodic cost. Accordingly, we increased our
discount rate used to determine our fiscal 2009 pension and
benefit costs to 7.57 percent. We maintained the expected
return on our pension plan assets at 8.25 percent, despite
the recent decline in the financial markets as we believe this
rate reflects the average rate of expected earnings on plan
assets that will fund our projected benefit obligation. Although
the fair value of our plan assets has declined as the financial
markets have declined, the impact of this decline is mitigated
by the fact that assets are smoothed for purposes of
determining net periodic pension cost. Accordingly, asset gains
and losses are recognized over time as a component of net
periodic pension and benefit costs for our Pension Account Plan,
our largest funded plan. Accordingly, our fiscal 2009 pension
and postretirement medical costs were materially the same as in
fiscal 2008.
For the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, our
total net periodic pension and other benefits cost was
$12.1 million and $12.0 million. Those costs relating
to our natural gas distribution operations are recoverable
through our gas distribution rates; however, a portion of these
costs is capitalized into our distribution rate base. The
remaining costs are recorded as a component of operation and
maintenance expense.
In accordance with the Pension Protection Act (PPA), we
determined the funded status of our plans as of January 1,
2009. Based upon this valuation, we expect we will be required
to contribute less than $25 million to our pension plans by
September 15, 2009. The need for this funding reflects the
decline in the fair value of the plans assets resulting
from the unfavorable market conditions experienced during the
latter half of calendar year 2008. This contribution will
increase the level of our plan assets to achieve a desirable PPA
funding threshold. With respect to our postretirement medical
plans, we anticipate contributing a total of approximately
$10 million to these plans during fiscal 2009.
The projected pension liability, future funding requirements and
the amount of pension expense or income recognized for the plan
are subject to change, depending upon the actuarial value of
plan assets and the determination of future benefit obligations
as of each subsequent actuarial calculation date. These amounts
are impacted by actual investment returns, changes in interest
rates and changes in the demographic composition of the
participants in the plan.
47
OPERATING
STATISTICS AND OTHER INFORMATION
The following tables present certain operating statistics for
our natural gas distribution, regulated transmission and
storage, natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and other
segments for the three-month periods ended December 31,
2008 and 2007.
Natural
Gas Distribution Sales and Statistical Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
METERS IN SERVICE, end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,929,319
|
|
|
|
2,925,426
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
273,590
|
|
|
|
275,438
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
Public authority and other
|
|
|
9,236
|
|
|
|
19,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total meters
|
|
|
3,214,377
|
|
|
|
3,222,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORY STORAGE BALANCE Bcf
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
SALES VOLUMES
MMcf(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
54,208
|
|
|
|
49,031
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
28,329
|
|
|
|
26,620
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,954
|
|
Public authority and other
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas sales volumes
|
|
|
91,446
|
|
|
|
84,767
|
|
Transportation volumes
|
|
|
35,285
|
|
|
|
34,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput
|
|
|
126,731
|
|
|
|
119,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES
(000s)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
647,100
|
|
|
$
|
554,289
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
302,694
|
|
|
|
268,469
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
50,155
|
|
|
|
51,176
|
|
Public authority and other
|
|
|
31,394
|
|
|
|
30,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas sales revenues
|
|
|
1,031,343
|
|
|
|
904,538
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
|
15,766
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
Other gas revenues
|
|
|
8,859
|
|
|
|
8,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,055,968
|
|
|
$
|
928,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average transportation revenue per Mcf
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
Average cost of gas per Mcf sold
|
|
$
|
8.28
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
See footnotes following these tables.
48
Regulated Transmission and Storage, Natural Gas Marketing and
Pipeline, Storage and Other Operations Sales and Statistical
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
CUSTOMERS, end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Other
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORY STORAGE BALANCE Bcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas marketing
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REGULATED TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE VOLUMES
MMcf(1)
|
|
|
192,172
|
|
|
|
188,864
|
|
NATURAL GAS MARKETING SALES VOLUMES
MMcf(1)
|
|
|
110,658
|
|
|
|
108,709
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES
(000s)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated transmission and storage
|
|
$
|
54,682
|
|
|
$
|
45,046
|
|
Natural gas marketing
|
|
|
787,495
|
|
|
|
840,717
|
|
Pipeline, storage and other
|
|
|
16,448
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
858,625
|
|
|
$
|
892,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to
preceding tables:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sales volumes and revenues reflect segment operations, including
intercompany sales and transportation amounts. |
RECENT
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Recent accounting developments and their impact on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows are described in
Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Information regarding our quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk are disclosed in Item 7A in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008. During the three
months ended December 31, 2008, there were no material
changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
market risk.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Managements
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange
Act). Based on this evaluation, the Companys principal
executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of December 31, 2008 to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by us,
including our consolidated entities, in the reports that we file
or
49
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by
the SECs rules and forms, including a reasonable level of
assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We did not make any changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the first quarter of the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, except as
noted in Note 8 to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements, there were no material changes in the
status of the litigation and environmental-related matters that
were disclosed in Note 12 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. We continue
to believe that the final outcome of such litigation and
environmental-related matters or claims will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
A list of exhibits required by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
and filed as part of this report is set forth in the
Exhibits Index, which immediately precedes such exhibits.
50
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Atmos Energy Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Fred
E. Meisenheimer
|
Fred E. Meisenheimer
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Controller
(Duly authorized signatory)
Date: February 4, 2009
51
EXHIBITS INDEX
Item 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Number
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications*
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These certifications, which were made pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 by the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, furnished as Exhibit 32 to
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
will not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or
incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates such certifications by reference. |
52