UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 1-1169

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

OHIO		34-0577130
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)
1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH		44706-2798
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

330.438.3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ      No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ      Accelerated filer o      Non-accelerated filer o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 
Yes o      No þ

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2007
Common Stock, without par value		95,584,461 shares

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Income

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)		2007				2006				2007				2006
Net sales		$	1,349,231			$	1,302,174			$	2,633,744			$	2,556,482
Cost of products sold			1,060,196				1,008,325				2,087,216				1,992,820
Gross Profit			289,035				293,849				546,528				563,662
Selling, administrative and general expenses			179,629				172,509				343,932				343,261
Impairment and restructuring charges			7,254				7,469				21,030				8,509
Loss (gain) on divestitures			(38	)			9,971				316				9,971
Operating Income			102,190				103,900				181,250				201,921
Interest expense			(10,080	)			(12,718	)			(19,724	)			(25,783	)
Interest income			1,200				1,021				3,155				2,484
Other expense — net			(3,593	)			(2,181	)			(6,978	)			(7,340	)
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes			89,717				90,022				157,703				171,282
Provision for income taxes			34,116				25,134				27,848				49,300
Income from Continuing Operations			55,601				64,888				129,855				121,982
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes			(275	)			9,803				665				18,649
Net Income		$	55,326			$	74,691			$	130,520			$	140,631
Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share
Continuing operations		$	0.59			$	0.70			$	1.38			$	1.31
Discontinued operations			—				0.10				—				0.20
Net income per share		$	0.59			$	0.80			$	1.38			$	1.51
Diluted earnings per share
Continuing operations		$	0.58			$	0.69			$	1.36			$	1.30
Discontinued operations			—				0.10				0.01				0.19
Net income per share		$	0.58			$	0.79			$	1.37			$	1.49
Dividends per share		$	0.16			$	0.15			$	0.32			$	0.30

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

		(Unaudited)
		June 30,				December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2007				2006
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	73,339			$	101,072
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2007 - $39,673; 2006 - $36,673			759,285				673,428
Inventories, net			981,287				952,310
Deferred income taxes			85,718				85,576
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses			17,552				11,083
Other current assets			89,642				76,811
Total Current Assets			2,006,823				1,900,280
Property, Plant and Equipment — Net			1,623,747				1,601,559
Other Assets
Goodwill			211,527				201,899
Other intangible assets			98,810				104,070
Deferred income taxes			168,948				169,417
Other non-current assets			55,791				54,308
Total Other Assets			535,076				529,694
Total Assets		$	4,165,646			$	4,031,533
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt		$	44,557			$	40,217
Accounts payable and other liabilities			525,945				506,301
Salaries, wages and benefits			192,253				225,409
Income taxes payable			34,750				52,768
Deferred income taxes			586				638
Current portion of long-term debt			20,092				10,236
Total Current Liabilities			818,183				835,569
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt			533,856				547,390
Accrued pension cost			351,008				410,438
Accrued postretirement benefits cost			680,011				682,934
Deferred income taxes			7,152				6,659
Other non-current liabilities			97,043				72,363
Total Non-Current Liabilities			1,669,070				1,719,784
Shareholders’ Equity
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value:
Authorized — 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued
Common stock without par value:
Authorized — 200,000,000 shares
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2007 – 95,885,284 shares; 2006 – 94,244,407 shares)
Stated capital			53,064				53,064
Other paid-in capital			795,158				753,095
Earnings invested in the business			1,322,909				1,217,167
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(483,163	)			(544,562	)
Treasury shares at cost (2007 – 300,823 shares; 2006 – 80,005 shares)			(9,575	)			(2,584	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity			1,678,393				1,476,180
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity		$	4,165,646			$	4,031,533

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2007				2006
CASH PROVIDED (USED)
Operating Activities
Net income		$	130,520			$	140,631
Net (income) from discontinued operations			(665	)			(18,649	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			102,475				97,378
Impairment charges			3,353				689
Loss (gain) on disposals of property, plant and equipment			561				(1	)
Loss on divestiture			—				9,311
Deferred income tax benefit			(6,530	)			(23,537	)
Stock based compensation expense			9,120				8,192
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(76,257	)			(75,965	)
Inventories			(11,518	)			(29,157	)
Other assets			(12,201	)			662
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			(47,428	)			(26,131	)
Foreign currency translation (gain)			(1,472	)			(11,007	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Continuing Operations			89,958				72,416
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Discontinued Operations			665				26,396
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities			90,623				98,812
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures			(124,979	)			(101,963	)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment			10,666				1,123
Divestitures			—				(2,723	)
Acquisitions			(1,523	)			—
Other			1,291				149
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Continuing Operations			(114,545	)			(103,414	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Discontinued Operations			—				(2,976	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities			(114,545	)			(106,390	)
Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid to shareholders			(30,401	)			(28,122	)
Net proceeds from common share activity			30,645				18,099
Accounts receivable securitization financing borrowings			—				30,000
Accounts receivable securitization financing payments			—				(30,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt			40,054				107,615
Payments on long-term debt			(48,402	)			(108,297	)
Short-term debt activity — net			495				(11,043	)
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities			(7,609	)			(21,748	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash			3,798				2,661
Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents			(27,733	)			(26,665	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year			101,072				65,417
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period		$	73,339			$	38,752

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PART I. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain amounts in the 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation.

Note 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes requirements and other guidance for financial statement recognition and measurement of positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 is recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The company adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the company recorded a $5,623 increase to retained earnings to recognize net tax benefits under the recognition and measurement criteria of FIN 48 that were previously not recognized under the company’s former accounting policy.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the standard expands the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on the company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 159 on the company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Note 3 — Inventories

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Inventories:
Manufacturing supplies		$	76,592			$	84,398
Work in process and raw materials			423,188				390,133
Finished products			481,507				477,779
Inventories		$	981,287			$	952,310

Note 3 — Inventories (continued)
 

Effective January 1, 2007, the company changed the method of accounting for certain product inventories for one of its domestic legal entities from the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. This change affects approximately 8% of the company’s total gross inventory at December 31, 2006. As a result of this change, substantially all domestic inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined on a LIFO basis, or market. The change is preferable because it improves financial reporting by supporting the continued integration of the company’s domestic bearing business, as well as providing a consistent and uniform costing method across the company’s domestic operations and reduces the complexity of intercompany transactions. SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” requires that a change in accounting principle be reflected through retrospective application of the new accounting principle to all prior periods, unless it is impractical to do so. The company has determined that retrospective application to a period prior to January 1, 2007 is not practical as the necessary information needed to restate prior periods is not available. Therefore, the company began to apply the LIFO method to these inventories beginning January 1, 2007. The adoption of the LIFO method for these inventories did not have a material impact on the company’s results of operations or financial position during the first half of 2007.

An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these are subject to many forces beyond management’s control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.

Note 4 — Property, Plant and Equipment

The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land and buildings		$	638,029			$	628,542
Machinery and equipment			3,143,636				3,036,266
Subtotal			3,781,665				3,664,808
Less allowances for depreciation			(2,157,918	)			(2,063,249	)
Property, Plant and Equipment — Net		$	1,623,747			$	1,601,559

At June 30, 2007, property, plant and equipment — net included approximately $96,814 in capitalized software. Depreciation expense was $44,854 and $96,736, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. Assets held for sale at June 30, 2007 were $12,165. Assets held for sale relate to land and buildings in Torrington, Connecticut and Desford, England and are classified as other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

		Balance												Balance
		December 31,												June 30,
		2006				Acquisitions				Other				2007
Goodwill:
Industrial		$	201,899			$	1,023			$	8,605			$	211,527
Total		$	201,899			$	1,023			$	8,605			$	211,527

Acquisitions represent the opening balance sheet adjustment for an acquisition completed in December 2006. Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note 5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
 

The following table displays intangible assets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

		As of June 30, 2007
		Gross								Net
		Carrying				Accumulated				Carrying
		Amount				Amortization				Amount
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Industrial		$	54,263			$	15,240			$	39,023
Automotive			71,540				27,586				43,954
Steel			850				354				496
		$	126,653			$	43,180			$	83,473
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Goodwill		$	211,527			$	—			$	211,527
Other			15,337				—				15,337
		$	226,864			$	—			$	226,864
Total intangible assets		$	353,517			$	43,180			$	310,337

		As of December 31, 2006
		Gross								Net
		Carrying				Accumulated				Carrying
		Amount				Amortization				Amount
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Industrial		$	54,654			$	12,754			$	41,900
Automotive			70,545				24,255				46,290
Steel			864				313				551
		$	126,063			$	37,322			$	88,741
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Goodwill		$	201,899			$	—			$	201,899
Other			15,329				—				15,329
		$	217,228			$	—			$	217,228
Total intangible assets		$	343,291			$	37,322			$	305,969

Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $3,000 and $5,700, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. Amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $10,800 for 2007 and is expected to be approximately $8,600 annually for the next five years.

Note 6 — Equity Investments

Investments accounted for under the equity method were $14,071 and $12,144 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and were reported in other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In first quarter of 2006, the company sold a portion of CoLinx, LLC due to the addition of another company to the joint venture.

Equity investments are reviewed for impairment when circumstances (such as lower-than-expected financial performance or change in strategic direction) indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be recoverable. If impairment does exist, the equity investment is written down to its fair value with a corresponding charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income. No impairments were recorded during the first six months of 2007 and 2006 relating to the company’s equity investments.

Note 6 — Equity Investments (continued)

PEL

During 2000, the company’s Steel Group invested in a joint venture, PEL, to commercialize a proprietary technology that converts iron units into engineered iron oxides for use in pigments, coatings and abrasives. The company concluded that PEL was a variable interest entity and that the company was the primary beneficiary. In accordance with FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,” the company consolidated PEL effective March 31, 2004. In the first quarter of 2006, plans were finalized to liquidate the assets of PEL, and the company recorded a related gain of approximately $3,549. In January 2006, the company repaid, in full, the $23,000 balance outstanding of the revenue bonds held by PEL. In June 2006, the company continued to liquidate PEL, with land and buildings exchanged and the buyer’s assumption of the fixed-rate mortgage, which resulted in a gain of $2,787.

Advanced Green Components

During 2002, the company’s Automotive Group formed a joint venture, Advanced Green Components LLC (AGC), with Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd. (Sanyo) and Showa Seiko Co., Ltd. (Showa). AGC is engaged in the business of converting steel to machined rings for tapered bearings and other related products. The company has been accounting for its investment in AGC under the equity method since AGC’s inception. During the third quarter of 2006, AGC refinanced its long-term debt of $12,240. The company guaranteed half of this obligation. The company concluded the refinancing represented a reconsideration event to evaluate whether AGC was a variable interest entity under FIN 46 (revised December 2003). The company concluded that AGC was a variable interest entity and that the company was the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the company consolidated AGC, effective September 30, 2006. All of AGC’s assets are collateral for its obligations. Except for AGC’s indebtedness for which the company is a guarantor, AGC’s creditors have no recourse to the general credit of the company.

Note 7 — Financing Arrangements

Short-term debt at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the company’s European and Asian subsidiaries with various banks with interest rates ranging from 4.36% to 11.50%		$	36,258			$	27,000
Fixed-rate short-term loans of an Asian subsidiary with interest rates ranging from 6.71% to 6.83% at June 30, 2007			4,001				10,005
Other			4,298				3,212
Short-term debt		$	44,557			$	40,217

Borrowings under the Accounts Receivable Securitization financing agreement (Asset Securitization), which provides for borrowings up to $200,000 subject to certain borrowing base limitations, are secured by certain trade receivables. Under the terms of the Asset Securitization, the company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, which in turn uses the trade receivables to secure the borrowings, which are funded through a vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term market. As of June 30, 2007, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility. A balance outstanding related to the Asset Securitization would be reflected on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in short-term debt. The yield on the commercial paper, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a financing cost and is included in interest expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of June 30, 2007, the company had issued letters of credit totaling $18,758, which reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization to $181,242.

The lines of credit for certain of the company’s European and Asian subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to $253,172. At June 30, 2007, the company had borrowings outstanding of $36,258, which reduced the availability under these facilities to $216,914.

Note 7 — Financing Arrangements (continued)
 

Long-term debt at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.20% to 7.76%		$	191,319			$	191,601
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality and Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (3.79% at June 30, 2007)			21,700				21,700
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (3.79% at June 30, 2007)			17,000				17,000
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, matured on May 1, 2007			—				8,000
Variable-rate Unsecured Canadian Note, Maturing on December 22, 2010 (5.05% at June 30, 2007)			54,271				49,593
Fixed-rate Unsecured Notes, maturing on February 15, 2010 with an interest rate of 5.75%			247,911				247,773
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC, maturing on July 18, 2008 (6.32% at June 30, 2007)			12,240				12,240
Other			9,507				9,719
			553,948				557,626
Less current maturities			20,092				10,236
Long-term debt		$	533,856			$	547,390

The company has a $500,000 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Senior Credit Facility) that matures on June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2007, the company had no outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility and had issued letters of credit under this facility totaling $24,809, which reduced the availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $475,191. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the company has two financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At June 30, 2007, the company was in full compliance with the covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and its other debt agreements.

In December 2005, the company entered into a 57,800 Canadian Dollar unsecured loan in Canada. The principal balance of the loan is payable in full on December 22, 2010. The interest rate is variable based on the Canadian LIBOR rate and interest payments are due quarterly.

AGC is a joint venture of the company formerly accounted for using the equity method. The company is the guarantor of $6,120 of AGC’s $12,240 credit facility. Effective September 30, 2006, the company consolidated AGC and its outstanding debt. Refer to Note 6 — Equity Investments for additional discussion.

Note 8 — Product Warranty

The company provides warranty policies on certain of its products. The company accrues liabilities under warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim experience in accordance with SFAS No. 5. Should the company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made quarterly to the reserves as claim data and historical experience change. The following is a rollforward of the warranty reserves for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Beginning balance, January 1		$	20,023			$	910
Expense			515				20,024
Payments			(495	)			(911	)
Ending balance		$	20,043			$	20,023

The product warranty charge in 2006 related primarily to a single production line at an individual plant that occurred during a limited period. The product warranty accrual at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 9 — Shareholders’ Equity

An analysis of the change in capital and earnings invested in the business is as follows:

		Common Stock												Earnings				Accumulated
										Other				Invested				Other
						Stated				Paid-In				in the				Comprehensive				Treasury
		Total				Capital				Capital				Business				Income				Stock
Balance at December 31, 2006		$	1,476,180			$	53,064			$	753,095			$	1,217,167			$	(544,562	)		$	(2,584	)
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48			5,623												5,623
Net Income			130,520												130,520
Foreign currency translation adjustment			46,214																46,214
Pension/OPEB liability adjustments during the period			15,077																15,077
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications			108																108
Total comprehensive income			191,919
Dividends — $0.32 per share			(30,401	)											(30,401	)
Tax benefit from stock compensation			4,807								4,807
Issuance (tender) of 220,818 shares from treasury and 1,640,878 shares from authorized			30,265								37,256												(6,991	)
Balance at June 30, 2007		$	1,678,393			$	53,064			$	795,158			$	1,322,909			$	(483,163	)		$	(9,575	)

The total comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $109,916 and $88,149, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $168,417.

Note 10 — Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share		$	55,601			$	64,888			$	129,855			$	121,982
Denominator:
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — basic			94,514,074				93,261,154				94,245,696				93,117,090
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and awards — based on the treasury stock method			1,052,045				1,052,516				950,089				1,060,459
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution of stock options and awards			95,566,119				94,313,670				95,195,785				94,177,549
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations		$	0.59			$	0.70			$	1.38			$	1.31
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations		$	0.58			$	0.69			$	1.36			$	1.30

The exercise prices for certain stock options that the company has awarded exceed the average market price of the company’s common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options outstanding were zero and 531,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The antidilutive stock options outstanding were 856,569 and 547,100 during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Note 11 — Segment Information

The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each Group is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to certain items that management does not consider representative of ongoing operations such as impairment and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and loss on the dissolution of subsidiary).

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Industrial Group
Net sales to external customers		$	565,458			$	528,605			$	1,109,534			$	1,032,049
Intersegment sales			486				462				852				897
Depreciation and amortization			18,196				18,484				38,821				36,840
EBIT, as adjusted			61,807				63,492				110,981				109,377
Automotive Group
Net sales to external customers		$	407,155			$	426,714			$	795,115			$	847,698
Depreciation and amortization			18,536				19,159				38,891				39,977
EBIT (loss), as adjusted			(7,391	)			(1,960	)			(14,624	)			(5,101	)
Steel Group
Net sales to external customers		$	376,618			$	346,855			$	729,095			$	676,735
Intersegment sales			34,151				36,441				71,966				81,971
Depreciation and amortization			11,243				10,245				24,763				20,561
EBIT, as adjusted			61,104				59,749				122,921				116,732
Reconciliation to Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes
Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments		$	115,520			$	121,281			$	219,278			$	221,008
Impairment and restructuring			(7,254	)			(7,469	)			(21,030	)			(8,509	)
Manufacturing rationalization expenses			(11,369	)			(6,261	)			(24,542	)			(9,674	)
Gain (loss) on divestiture			38				(9,971	)			(316	)			(9,971	)
Other			2,029				2,662				2,372				2,354
Interest expense			(10,080	)			(12,718	)			(19,724	)			(25,783	)
Interest income			1,200				1,021				3,155				2,484
Intersegment adjustments			(367	)			1,477				(1,490	)			(627	)
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes		$	89,717			$	90,022			$	157,703			$	171,282

Note 12 — Impairment and Restructuring Charges

Impairment and restructuring charges by segment are comprised of the following:

For the three months ended June 30, 2007:

		Industrial				Automotive				Steel				Total
Impairment charges		$	955			$	—			$	—			$	955
Severance expense and related benefit costs			—				3,109				989				4,098
Exit costs			4				1,865				332				2,201
Total		$	959			$	4,974			$	1,321			$	7,254

For the six months ended June 30, 2007:

		Industrial				Automotive				Steel				Total
Impairment charges		$	3,353			$	—			$	—			$	3,353
Severance expense and related benefit costs			(155	)			9,655				5,616				15,116
Exit costs			36				2,129				396				2,561
Total		$	3,234			$	11,784			$	6,012			$	21,030

For the three months ended June 30, 2006:

		Industrial				Automotive				Steel				Total
Impairment charges		$	—			$	689			$	—			$	689
Severance expense and related benefit costs			—				5,635				—				5,635
Exit costs			119				1,026				—				1,145
Total		$	119			$	7,350			$	—			$	7,469

For the six months ended June 30, 2006:

		Industrial				Automotive				Steel				Total
Impairment charges		$	—			$	689			$	—			$	689
Severance expense and related benefit costs			—				6,601				—				6,601
Exit costs			174				1,045				—				1,219
Total		$	174			$	8,335			$	—			$	8,509

Industrial

In May 2004, the company announced plans to rationalize the company’s three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio within the Industrial Group. On September 15, 2005, the company reached a new four-year agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which went into effect on September 26, 2005, when the prior contract expired. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $25,000 by 2009 through streamlining operations and workforce reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $35,000 to $40,000.

Impairment charges of $804 and $3,202 and exit costs of $1 and $33 were recorded in the second quarter and first six months of 2007, respectively, as a result of the Industrial Group’s rationalization plans. During the second quarter and first six months of 2006, exit costs of $119 and $174, respectively, were recorded as a result of the Industrial Group’s rationalization plans. Including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses, the Industrial Group has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $26,998 as of June 30, 2007 for these rationalization plans.

Note 12 — Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)

Automotive

In 2005, the company announced plans for its Automotive Group to restructure its business and improve performance. These plans included the closure of a manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina and engineering facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia. In February 2006, the company announced additional plans to rationalize production capacity at the company’s Vierzon, France bearing manufacturing facility in response to changes in customer demand for its products.

In September 2006, the company announced further planned reductions in its Automotive Group workforce. In March 2007, the company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The company anticipates that this manufacturing facility will close in early 2008.

These plans are targeted to collectively deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $75,000 by 2008, with expected net workforce reductions of approximately 1,300 to 1,400 positions and pretax costs of approximately $125,000 to $135,000, which include restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. The Automotive Group has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $87,195 as of June 30, 2007 for these plans.

During the second quarter and first six months of 2007, the company recorded $3,109 and $9,655, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and $1,865 and $2,129, respectively, of exit costs associated with the Automotive Group’s restructuring and workforce reduction plans. The exit costs recorded in the second quarter of 2007 were primarily the result of environmental charges related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The company recorded impairment charges of $689, severance and related benefit costs of $5,635, and exits costs of $1,026 during the second quarter of 2006, and the company recorded impairment charges of $689, severance and related benefit costs of $6,601 and exits costs of $1,045 during the first six months of 2006. The charges taken during the respective periods of 2006 related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina and administrative facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia, and the rationalization of the company’s Vierzon, France bearing manufacturing facility.

Steel

In April 2007, the company completed the closure of its European seamless steel tube facility located in Desford, England. The company recorded $929 and $5,556 of severance and related benefit costs, and $332 and $396 of exit costs during the second quarter and first six months of 2007, respectively, related to this action.

The rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual is as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Beginning balance, January 1		$	31,985			$	18,143
Expense			17,743				29,614
Payments			(24,457	)			(15,772	)
Ending balance		$	25,271			$	31,985

The restructuring accrual at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The majority of the accrual balance at June 30, 2007 is expected to be paid by the middle of 2008.

Note 13 — Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the company’s retirement and postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are based on actuarial calculations prepared during 2006. Consistent with prior years, these calculations will be updated later in the year. These updated calculations may result in different net periodic benefit cost for 2007. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is the company’s best estimate of each period’s proportionate share of the amounts to be recorded for the year ended December 31, 2007.

		Pension								Postretirement
		Three Months ended								Three Months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost		$	9,594			$	10,745			$	1,181			$	1,087
Interest cost			37,579				38,624				10,382				9,778
Expected return on plan assets			(47,596	)			(43,648	)			—				—
Amortization of prior service cost			2,833				3,124				(464	)			(485	)
Recognized net actuarial loss			11,174				14,032				3,099				2,055
Amortization of transition asset			(44	)			(44	)			—				—
Net periodic benefit cost		$	13,540			$	22,833			$	14,198			$	12,435

		Pension								Postretirement
		Six Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost		$	20,696			$	22,693			$	2,431			$	2,655
Interest cost			77,475				78,749				20,682				22,131
Expected return on plan assets			(94,644	)			(86,733	)			—				—
Amortization of prior service cost			5,657				6,242				(939	)			(970	)
Recognized net actuarial loss			23,673				28,971				5,524				6,119
Amortization of transition asset			(84	)			(86	)			—				—
Net periodic benefit cost		$	32,773			$	49,836			$	27,698			$	29,935

Effective November 30, 2006, the company sold its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. As part of the sale, Latrobe Steel retained responsibility for the pension and postretirement benefit obligations with respect to current and retired employees covered by collective bargaining arrangements. The net periodic benefit cost for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 includes $1,165 and $2,330, respectively, for defined benefit pension and postretirement plans retained by Latrobe Steel classified as discontinued operations.

Note 14 — Income Taxes

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Provision for income taxes		$	34,116			$	25,134			$	27,848			$	49,300
Effective tax rate			38.0	%			27.9	%			17.7	%			28.8	%

The company’s provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying its estimated annual effective tax rate against income from continuing operations before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items, including interest on prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the period in which they occur.

The increase in the effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006 was primarily caused by increased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be claimed, as well as favorable tax reserve adjustments in the second quarter of 2006.

Note 14 — Income Taxes (continued)
 

The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2007 was higher than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate primarily due to (1) the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries, (2) U.S. state and local income taxes, (3) taxes incurred on foreign remittances, and (4) other tax expense items, including the accrual of interest expense related to uncertain tax positions from prior years. This was partially offset by (1) tax benefits on foreign income, including tax holidays in certain foreign jurisdictions as well as earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, (2) the U.S. manufacturing deduction, and (3) other tax benefit items, including the accrual of the tax-free Medicare prescription drug subsidy, deductible dividends paid to the company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and the U.S. Federal research tax credit.

The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2006 was lower than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate primarily due to (1) tax benefits on foreign income, including tax holidays in certain foreign jurisdictions as well as earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, (2) tax benefits on U.S. exports, and (3) other tax benefit items, including a net reduction in the company’s tax reserves related primarily to the settlement of certain prior year tax matters with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during the second quarter, accrual of the tax-free Medicare prescription drug subsidy, deductible dividends paid to the company’s ESOP, and the U.S. manufacturing deduction. These benefits were partially offset by (1) U.S. state and local income taxes, (2) taxes on foreign remittances, (3) the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries, and (4) other U.S. book-tax differences.

The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first six months of 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006 was primarily caused by favorable adjustments to the company’s uncertain tax positions, partially offset by increased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be claimed.

The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2007 was lower than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate primarily due to (1) the net tax benefit of adjustments to the company’s uncertain tax positions, including a favorable adjustment of $32,100 recorded in the first quarter of 2007 to recognize the benefit of a prior year tax position as a result of a change in tax law during the quarter, (2) tax benefits on foreign income, including tax holidays in certain foreign jurisdictions as well as earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, (3) the U.S. manufacturing deduction, and (4) other tax benefit items, including the accrual of the tax-free Medicare prescription drug subsidy, deductible dividends paid to the company’s ESOP and the U.S. Federal research tax credit. These additional tax benefits were partially offset by (1) the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries, (2) U.S. state and local income taxes, (3) taxes incurred on foreign remittances, (4) other tax expense items, including the accrual of interest expense related to uncertain tax positions from prior years.

For the first six months of 2006, the effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate primarily due to (1) tax benefits on foreign income, including tax holidays in certain foreign jurisdictions as well as the earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, (2) tax benefits on U.S. exports, and (3) other tax benefit items, including a net reduction in the company’s tax reserves related primarily to the settlement of certain prior year tax matters with the IRS during the second quarter, accrual of the tax-free Medicare prescription drug subsidy, deductible dividends paid to the company’s ESOP, and the U.S. manufacturing deduction. These benefits were partially offset by (1) U.S. state and local income taxes, (2) taxes on foreign remittances, (3) the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries, and (4) other U.S. book-tax differences.

Effective January 1, 2007, the company adopted FIN 48, including the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.” In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the company recorded a $5,623 increase to retained earnings to recognize net tax benefits under the recognition and measurement criteria of FIN 48 that were previously not recognized under the company’s former accounting policy. The company records interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the company had approximately $7,800 of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. As of January 1, 2007, the company had approximately $137,300 of total gross unrecognized tax benefits.

During the first quarter of 2007, the company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $29,800, as the company recognized a tax benefit related to a prior year tax position due to a change in tax law in the quarter. The tax position relates to one of the company’s foreign affiliates and was not anticipated as of the beginning of the year.

As of June 30, 2007, the company had approximately $107,000 of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included in this amount is approximately $30,600 (including the federal benefit on state tax positions), which represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would favorably impact the company’s effective income tax rate in any future periods if such benefits were recognized. As of June 30, 2007, the company anticipates a decrease in its unrecognized tax positions of approximately $70,000 to $75,000 during the next 12 months. The anticipated decrease is primarily due to settlements and resulting cash payments related to tax years 2002 to 2005, which are currently under examination by the IRS. The tax positions under examination include the timing of income recognition for certain amounts received by the company and treated as capital contributions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 118 and other miscellaneous items. As of June 30, 2007, the company had accrued approximately $5,700 of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

Note 15 —Divestitures

In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its subsidiary, Latrobe Steel. Latrobe Steel is a leading global producer and distributor of high-quality, vacuum melted specialty steels and alloys. This business was part of the Steel Group for segment reporting purposes. The following results of operations for this business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Net sales		$	—			$	85,851			$	—			$	178,623
Earnings before income taxes			—				15,686				—				29,839
Income tax on operations			—				(5,883	)			—				(11,190	)
Gain (loss) on divestiture			(453	)			—				1,098				—
Income tax on disposal			178				—				(433	)			—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		$	(275	)		$	9,803			$	665			$	18,649

The gain on divestiture recorded in the first six months of 2007 primarily represents a purchase price adjustment. As of December 31, 2006, there were no assets or liabilities remaining from the divestiture of Latrobe Steel.

In June 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Timken Precision Components — Europe business. This business was part of the Steel Group. The company recognized a pretax loss on divestiture of $9,971, and the loss was reflected in Loss on divestitures in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 

Overview

Introduction

The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and alloy steels and a provider of related products and services. Timken operates under three segments: Industrial Group, Automotive Group and Steel Group.

The Industrial and Automotive Groups design, manufacture and distribute a range of bearings and related products and services. Industrial Group customers include both original equipment manufacturers and distributors for agriculture, construction, mining, energy, mill, machine tool, aerospace and rail applications. Automotive Group customers include original equipment manufacturers and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, and medium- to heavy-duty trucks. Steel Group products include steels of low and intermediate alloy and carbon grades, in both solid and tubular sections, as well as custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications, including bearings.

Financial Overview

Overview:

		2Q 2007				2Q 2006				$ Change				% Change
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales		$	1,349.2			$	1,302.2			$	47.0				3.6	%
Income from continuing operations			55.6				64.9				(9.3	)			(14.3	)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations			(0.3	)			9.8				(10.1	)			(103.1	)%
Net income		$	55.3			$	74.7				(19.4	)			(26.0	)%
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations		$	0.58			$	0.69			$	(0.11	)			(15.9	)%
Discontinued operations			—				0.10				(0.10	)			(100.0	)%
Net income per share		$	0.58			$	0.79			$	(0.21	)			(26.6	)%
Average number of shares — diluted			95,566,119				94,313,670				—				1.3	%

		YTD 2007				YTD 2006				$ Change				% Change
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales		$	2,633.7			$	2,556.5			$	77.2				3.0	%
Income from continuing operations			129.8				122.0				7.8				6.4	%
Income from discontinued operations			0.7				18.6				(17.9	)			(96.2	)%
Net income		$	130.5			$	140.6				(10.1	)			(7.2	)%
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations		$	1.36			$	1.30			$	0.06				4.6	%
Discontinued operations			0.01				0.19				(0.18	)			(94.7	)%
Net income per share		$	1.37			$	1.49			$	(0.12	)			(8.1	)%
Average number of shares — diluted			95,195,785				94,177,549				—				1.1	%

Net sales for the second quarter of 2007 were approximately $1.35 billion, compared to $1.30 billion in the second quarter of 2006, an increase of 3.6%. Net sales for the first six months of 2007 were approximately $2.63 billion, compared to $2.56 billion for the first six months of 2006, an increase of 3.0%. Higher sales were driven by continued strong industrial markets across the Industrial and Steel Groups, offset by lower sales in the Automotive Group due to the divestiture of its steering operations in 2006. In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Discontinued operations for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 represent the operating results, net of tax, of Latrobe Steel. For the second quarter of 2007, earnings per diluted share were $0.58, compared to $0.79 per diluted share for second quarter of 2006. Income from continuing operations per diluted share was $0.58 for the second quarter of 2007, compared to $0.69 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2006. For the first six months of 2007, earnings per diluted share were $1.37, compared to $1.49 per diluted share for the first six months of 2006. Income from continuing operations per diluted share was $1.36, compared to $1.30 per diluted share for the same period a year ago.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 

The company’s second quarter and first half of 2007 results reflect the ongoing strength of industrial markets and the performance of the Steel Group, offset by higher raw material costs and higher restructuring activities. The company continued its focus to increase production capacity in targeted areas, including major capacity expansions for industrial products at several manufacturing locations around the world.

The company’s first half results also reflect a favorable discrete tax adjustment of $32.1 million to recognize the benefits of a prior year tax position due to a change in tax law.

The company expects that the continued strength in industrial markets throughout 2007 should drive year-over-year volume and margin improvement. While global industrial markets are expected to remain strong, the improvements in the company’s operating performance will be partially constrained by restructuring initiatives, as well as strategic investments, including Asian growth and Project O.N.E. initiatives. The objective of the Asian growth initiatives is to increase market share, influence major design centers and expand the company’s network of sources of globally competitive friction management products.

Project O.N.E. is a five-year program, beginning in 2005, designed to improve the company’s business processes and systems. The company expects to invest approximately $170 million, which includes internal and external costs, to implement Project O.N.E. As of June 30, 2007, the company has spent approximately $126.7 million, of which approximately $74 million has been capitalized. The company completed the installation of Project O.N.E. for a major portion of its domestic operations during the second quarter of 2007.

The company’s strategy for the Industrial Group is to pursue growth in selected industrial markets and achieve a leadership position in targeted Asian markets. The company is increasing large-bore bearing capacity in Romania, China, India and the United States to serve heavy industrial markets. The Industrial Group expects to benefit from this increase in large-bore bearing capacity during the second half of 2007. In addition, the company is investing in a new aerospace precision products manufacturing facility in China, which is expected to make its first shipment in early 2008.

The company’s strategy for the Automotive Group is to make structural changes to its business to improve its financial performance. In 2005, the company announced plans for its Automotive Group to restructure its business. These plans included the closure of its automotive engineering center in Torrington, Connecticut and its manufacturing engineering center in Norcross, Georgia. Additionally, the company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina. In February 2006, the company announced plans to downsize its manufacturing facility in Vierzon, France.

In September 2006, the company announced further planned reductions in its Automotive Group workforce. In March 2007, the company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The company anticipates that this manufacturing facility will close in early 2008.

These plans are targeted to collectively deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $75 million by 2008, with expected net workforce reductions of approximately 1,300 to 1,400 positions and pretax costs of approximately $125 million to $135 million, which include restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses.

In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its steering operations located in Watertown, Connecticut and Nova Friburgo, Brazil. The steering operations employed approximately 900 associates.

The company’s strategy for the Steel Group is to focus on opportunities where the company can offer differentiated capabilities while driving profitable growth. In January 2007, the company announced plans to invest approximately $60 million to enable the company to competitively produce steel bars down to 1-inch diameter for use in power transmission and friction management applications for a variety of customers, including the rapidly growing automotive transplants. During the first quarter of 2007, the company added a new induction heat-treat line in Canton, Ohio, which increased capacity and the ability to provide differentiated product to more customers in its global energy markets. In April 2007, the company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing operations located in Desford, England.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 

The Statement of Income

Sales by Segment:

		2Q 2007				2Q 2006				$ Change				% Change
(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales)
Industrial Group		$	565.5			$	528.6			$	36.9				7.0	%
Automotive Group			407.1				426.7				(19.6	)			(4.6	)%
Steel Group			376.6				346.9				29.7				8.6	%
Total Company		$	1,349.2			$	1,302.2			$	47.0				3.6	%

		YTD 2007				YTD 2006				$ Change				% Change
(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales)
Industrial Group		$	1,109.5			$	1,032.0			$	77.5				7.5	%
Automotive Group			795.1				847.7				(52.6	)			(6.2	)%
Steel Group			729.1				676.8				52.3				7.7	%
Total Company		$	2,633.7			$	2,556.5			$	77.2				3.0	%

The Industrial Group’s net sales in the second quarter of 2007 increased from the second quarter of 2006 as a result of favorable pricing, higher volume in the heavy industry and automotive aftermarket sectors and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation. The Automotive Group’s net sales in the second quarter of 2007 decreased from the second quarter of 2006 primarily due to the divestiture of its steering operations located in Watertown, Connecticut and Nova Friburgo, Brazil and lower demand from North American heavy truck customers, partially offset by higher demand from North American light truck customers and a favorable impact from foreign currency translation. The Steel Group’s net sales in the second quarter of 2007 increased from the same period a year ago primarily due to strong demand by customers in the energy and automotive sectors, as well as increased surcharges to recover high raw material costs, partially offset by the decline in sales resulting from the sale of its Timken Precision Steel Components — Europe business in June 2006 and the closure of its manufacturing operation in Desford, England in April 2007.

The Industrial Group’s net sales in the first six months of 2007 increased from the first six months of 2006 as a result of favorable pricing, higher volume across most end markets, particularly in the heavy industry and aerospace sectors and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation on sales. The Automotive Group’s net sales in the first six months of 2007 decreased from the first six months of 2006 primarily due to the divestiture of its steering operations and lower demand from North American heavy truck customers, partially offset by a favorable impact from foreign currency translation on sales. The Steel Group’s net sales in the first six months of 2007 increased from the same period a year ago primarily due to strong demand by customers in the energy sector, as well as increased pricing and surcharges to recover high raw material costs, partially offset by lower sales resulting from the sale of its Timken Precision Steel Components — Europe business and the closure of its manufacturing operation in Desford, England.

Gross Profit:

		2Q 2007				2Q 2006				$ Change				Change
(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit		$	289.0			$	293.8			$	(4.8	)			(1.6	)%
Gross profit % to net sales			21.4	%			22.6	%			—				(120	) bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold		$	10.7			$	4.9			$	5.8				118.4	%

		YTD 2007				YTD 2006				$ Change				Change
(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit		$	546.5			$	563.7			$	(17.2	)			(3.1	)%
Gross profit % to net sales			20.8	%			22.0	%			—				(120	) bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold		$	22.6			$	8.0			$	14.6				182.5	%