FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(412) 394-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At April 28, 2009, the registrant had outstanding 98,017,737 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
506.0 |
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
448.8 |
|
|
|
530.5 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
746.2 |
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
1,745.9 |
|
|
|
1,929.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,709.8 |
|
|
|
1,633.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
263.8 |
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
189.1 |
|
|
|
190.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
124.7 |
|
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,033.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
232.6 |
|
|
$ |
278.5 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
273.5 |
|
|
|
322.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
545.6 |
|
|
|
693.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
|
494.6 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
449.5 |
|
|
|
446.9 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
405.2 |
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
121.9 |
|
|
|
127.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,011.0 |
|
|
|
2,141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008; outstanding-98,011,785 shares at
March 31, 2009 and 97,330,969 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
639.4 |
|
|
|
651.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,260.3 |
|
|
|
2,286.7 |
|
Treasury stock: 4,392,471 shares at March 31, 2009 and
5,073,287 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(211.7 |
) |
|
|
(244.8 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(747.2 |
) |
|
|
(746.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,951.0 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,022.3 |
|
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,033.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
831.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,343.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
750.9 |
|
|
|
1,052.8 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest, other income
and income taxes |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
220.4 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
221.6 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
143.7 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
attributable to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
attributable to ATI common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(38.5 |
) |
|
|
25.3 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
(169.3 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
(63.8 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
|
|
80.9 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Accrued income taxes, net of tax benefits on share-based compensation |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
53.8 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
168.9 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(108.6 |
) |
|
|
(112.0 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(109.2 |
) |
|
|
(111.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Net repayments under credit facilities |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in debt |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based compensation |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.3 |
) |
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(109.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(155.3 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|
|
469.9 |
|
|
|
623.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
506.0 |
|
|
$ |
468.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CONSOLIDATED EQUITY
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Income |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
693.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,830.7 |
|
|
$ |
(75.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(237.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,279.2 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
143.7 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.3 |
) |
Effect of changing the
measurement date for pension
plans and other postretirement
benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
639.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,954.5 |
|
|
$ |
(102.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(218.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,346.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
651.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,286.7 |
|
|
$ |
(244.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(746.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,029.0 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Foreign currency translation
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
639.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,260.3 |
|
|
$ |
(211.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(747.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,022.3 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. The December 31, 2008 financial information has been
derived from our audited financial statements, which were revised in the current period to reflect
changes in the presentation of noncontrolling interests (formerly minority interests) in accordance
with the required adoption of the accounting standard discussed below. Certain amounts from prior
years have been reclassified to conform with the 2009 presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncement Adopted
As required, in the first quarter 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160 (FAS 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
Early adoption of this standard was prohibited. FAS 160 changes the classification of
noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for and reporting of
transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under the
new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are reported as an element of
stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability sections of the balance sheet.
In addition, the practice of reporting minority interest expense or benefit changed. Under the new
standard, net income encompasses the total income before noncontrolling interest expense or
benefit. The income statement includes separate disclosure of the attribution of income or loss
between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Absent a change in control, increases and
decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are accounted for as equity transactions.
As a result of adopting FAS 160, the balance sheet and the income statement have been recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interest in our STAL joint venture.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
(FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. The adoption of FAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, had no impact on the financial statements. The provisions of FAS 157 will be applied
at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is
required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been
calculated prior to the adoption of FAS 157.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 states
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. There was no impact to
reported earnings per share upon adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1.
7
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
138.0 |
|
|
$ |
163.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
772.6 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
144.6 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
929.0 |
|
|
|
1,101.1 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(178.1 |
) |
|
|
(205.6 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
746.2 |
|
|
$ |
887.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, decreased cost of sales by $27.5 million for the first three
months of 2009 compared to an increase to cost of sales of $1.3 million for the first three months
of 2008.
Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information
Property, plant and equipment at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
317.5 |
|
|
|
310.9 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,598.2 |
|
|
|
2,508.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,938.8 |
|
|
|
2,842.5 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,229.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,208.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,709.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,633.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Debt
Debt at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allegheny Technologies $300 million 8.375% Notes
due 2011, net (a) |
|
$ |
303.9 |
|
|
$ |
304.2 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures, due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit
agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
Foreign credit agreements |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020 |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
503.5 |
|
|
|
509.8 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
488.8 |
|
|
$ |
494.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $6.2
million at March 31, 2009 and $6.7 million at December 31, 2008. |
8
The Company has a $400 million senior unsecured domestic revolving credit facility (the
facility), which includes a $200 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. As of
March 31, 2009, there had been no borrowings made under the facility, although a portion of the
facility was used to support approximately $12 million in letters of credit. The Company has an
additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of March 31, 2009,
$30 million in letters of credit was outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, had approximately $5 million in letters of credit outstanding as of March 31, 2009
related to the expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China. These letters of credit are
supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture
partners.
Note 5. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
per common share net income attributable to
ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share-weighted average shares |
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option equivalents |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares and
assumed conversions |
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
|
Basic net income per common share attributable to
ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share attributable
to ATI common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
As part of its risk management strategy, the Company, from time-to-time, utilizes derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy costs,
foreign currencies, and interest rates. The Company accounts for all of these contracts as hedges
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (FAS 133). In general, hedge effectiveness is determined by examining the
relationship between offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the item being
hedged, and the financial instrument being used for the hedge. Effectiveness is measured utilizing
regression analysis and other techniques to determine whether the change in the fair market value
or cash flows of the derivative exceeds the change in fair value or cash flow of the hedged item.
Calculated ineffectiveness, if any, is immediately recognized on the statement of income.
The Company sometimes uses futures and swap contracts to manage exposure to changes in prices
for forecasted purchases of raw materials, such as nickel, and natural gas. Generally under these
contracts, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, the price of the item being hedged is fixed
at the time that the contract is entered into and the Company is obligated to make or receive a
payment equal to the net change between this fixed price and the market price at the date the
contract matures.
9
The majority of ATIs products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index
mechanisms. However, as of March 31, 2009, the Company had entered into financial hedging
arrangements primarily at the request of its customers, related to firm orders, for approximately
7% of the Companys total annual nickel requirements through 2010. Any gain or loss associated
with these hedging arrangements is included in the selling price to the customer requesting the
hedge over the designated hedge period.
At March 31, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys exposure
to natural gas cost volatility represented approximately 40% of our forecasted requirements for the
next three years.
While the majority of the Companys direct export sales are transacted in U.S. dollars,
foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit transactional exposure to
changes in currency exchange rates for those transactions denominated in a non-U.S. currency. The
Company sometimes purchases foreign currency forward contracts that permit it to sell specified
amounts of foreign currencies expected to be received from its export sales for pre-established
U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates. The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign
currencies in which export sales are denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the
variability in cash flows of a portion of the forecasted future export sales transactions which
otherwise would expose the Company to foreign currency risk. At March 31, 2009, the outstanding
financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros,
represented approximately 8% of our forecasted total international sales through 2011. In
addition, the Company may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of
forecasted foreign currency transactions.
The Company may enter into derivative interest rate contracts to maintain a reasonable balance
between fixed- and floating-rate debt. There were no unsettled derivative financial instruments
related to debt balances for the periods presented, although previously settled contracts remain a
component of the recorded value of debt. See Note 4. Debt, for further information.
10
For derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged item affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness
are recognized in current period results. The Company did not use fair value or net
investment hedges for the periods presented.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
on Derivatives (Ineffective |
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
OCI on Derivatives |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Derivatives in FAS 133 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
from Effectiveness |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Relationships |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
|
Selling, general & administrative exp. |
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
Selling, general & administrative exp. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Selling, general & administrative exp. |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
Assuming market rates remain constant with the rates at March 31, 2009, a loss of $19.5
million is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.
The disclosures of gains or losses presented above for nickel and other raw material
contracts, and foreign currency contracts do not take into account the anticipated underlying
transactions. Since these derivative contracts represent hedges, the net effect of any gain or
loss on results of operations may be fully or partially offset.
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments are presented below. All
fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 information as defined by the FAS 157
fair value hierarchy, which includes quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Balance sheet location |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
60.6 |
|
|
$ |
61.5 |
|
There are no credit risk-related contingent features in our derivative contracts, and the
contracts contained no provisions under which we have posted, or would be required to post,
collateral. The counterparties to our derivative contracts were substantial and creditworthy
commercial banks that are recognized market makers. We control our credit exposure by diversifying
across multiple counterparties and by monitoring credit ratings and credit default swap spreads of
our counterparties. We also enter into master netting agreements with counterparties when possible.
11
Note 7. Income Taxes
Results for the first quarter 2009 included an income tax benefit of $5.0 million compared to
an income tax provision of $77.9 million, or 35.2% of income before tax, for the comparable 2008
quarter. The 2009 first quarter benefited from a lower income tax provision due primarily to $5.1
million of discrete adjustments associated primarily with prior years taxes. The 2008 first
quarter included a discrete $2.6 million benefit related to foreign taxes.
Note 8. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the components of pension (income) expense
and components of other postretirement benefit expense for the Companys defined benefit plans
included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pension Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension (income) expense |
|
$ |
31.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Other Postretirement Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense defined benefit plans |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefit costs for a defined contribution plan were $0.5 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 and zero for the comparable prior year period.
12
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments for
the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
407.0 |
|
|
$ |
525.1 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
760.6 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
128.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
869.6 |
|
|
|
1,414.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
387.9 |
|
|
|
481.0 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
378.2 |
|
|
|
746.9 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
831.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,343.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
$ |
131.4 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
240.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Interest income, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
221.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense represents defined benefit plan pension expense, and other
postretirement benefit expense for both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Operating
profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any retirement benefit expense.
Corporate expenses for the first three months of 2009 were $14.4 million, compared to $17.7
million for the first three months of 2008. This decrease is due primarily to lower expenses
associated with long-term performance-based cash incentive compensation programs.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented
primarily in selling and administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of income.
These items resulted in net charges of $4.0 million for the first three months of 2009 and $0.9
million for the first three months of 2008. This increase was primarily related to lower foreign
currency gains, and higher franchise and other non-income related taxes.
Note 10. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
13
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows.
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
313.3 |
|
|
$ |
189.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
506.0 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
154.2 |
|
|
|
294.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.4 |
|
|
|
631.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
591.5 |
|
|
|
1,150.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,745.9 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
397.5 |
|
|
|
1,310.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,709.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
263.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263.8 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189.1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,405.4 |
|
|
|
1,577.3 |
|
|
|
1,346.2 |
|
|
|
(7,204.2 |
) |
|
|
124.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,675.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,678.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,883.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7,204.2 |
) |
|
$ |
4,033.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
$ |
145.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
232.6 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,896.6 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
762.1 |
|
|
|
(2,450.5 |
) |
|
|
273.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,926.3 |
|
|
|
158.1 |
|
|
|
911.7 |
|
|
|
(2,450.5 |
) |
|
|
545.6 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
303.8 |
|
|
|
366.6 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
488.8 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
272.7 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449.5 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
379.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405.2 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,653.1 |
|
|
|
821.8 |
|
|
|
1,186.6 |
|
|
|
(2,650.5 |
) |
|
|
2,011.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,022.3 |
|
|
|
1,856.6 |
|
|
|
2,697.1 |
|
|
|
(4,553.7 |
) |
|
|
2,022.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,675.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,678.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,883.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7,204.2 |
) |
|
$ |
4,033.3 |
|
|
|
|
14
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
354.2 |
|
|
$ |
477.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
831.6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
334.2 |
|
|
|
393.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750.9 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Less: Net income (loss)
attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
(40.3 |
) |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(16.1 |
) |
|
$ |
92.9 |
|
|
$ |
92.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(94.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
31.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
15
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
281.8 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
469.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
191.9 |
|
|
|
338.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530.5 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.4 |
|
|
|
697.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Prepaid expenses, and other current
assets |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
668.8 |
|
|
|
1,256.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
395.2 |
|
|
|
1,236.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.9 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,666.3 |
|
|
|
1,514.7 |
|
|
|
1,304.3 |
|
|
|
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,953.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,690.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,876.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
83.7 |
|
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278.5 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,132.3 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
798.1 |
|
|
|
(2,682.9 |
) |
|
|
322.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,214.2 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
993.9 |
|
|
|
(2,682.9 |
) |
|
|
693.9 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
371.8 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
494.6 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
270.9 |
|
|
|
176.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446.9 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
351.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378.2 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,924.5 |
|
|
|
832.9 |
|
|
|
1,266.9 |
|
|
|
(2,882.9 |
) |
|
|
2,141.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
1,857.9 |
|
|
|
2,609.6 |
|
|
|
(4,467.5 |
) |
|
|
2,029.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,953.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,690.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,876.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7,350.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,170.4 |
|
|
|
|
16
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
695.0 |
|
|
$ |
648.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,343.4 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
572.6 |
|
|
|
470.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,052.8 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
259.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(265.8 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
221.6 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
146.1 |
|
|
|
(265.8 |
) |
|
|
221.6 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
(96.3 |
) |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
143.7 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
(169.5 |
) |
|
|
143.7 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
142.0 |
|
|
$ |
75.6 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
$ |
(167.8 |
) |
|
$ |
142.0 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows
provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
(33.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(59.0 |
) |
|
$ |
158.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(99.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111.7 |
) |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
(84.2 |
) |
|
|
(59.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109.6 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(155.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(155.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the nature and
extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required, and the number, participation, and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties (PRPs). The Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to reflect new
17
information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations in a given period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments.
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell the Companys securities. Future
developments, administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however,
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
At March 31, 2009, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled
approximately $18 million, of which $7 million was included in other current liabilities. The
reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $5 million for federal Superfund and comparable
state-managed sites; $7 million for formerly owned or operated sites for which the Company has
remediation or indemnification obligations; $4 million for owned or controlled sites at which
Company operations have been discontinued; and $2 million for sites utilized by the Company in its
ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may be able to recover a portion
of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial, government contracting work,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental and health and safety, and stockholder matters.
While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits,
claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that
the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one
or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations for that period.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
executive offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone
number (412) 394-2800. References to Allegheny Technologies, ATI, the Company, the
Registrant, we, our and us and similar terms mean Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and
its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers
in the world. We use innovative technologies to offer global markets a wide range of specialty
metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, zirconium, hafnium, and niobium, stainless and specialty steel alloys, grain-oriented
electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy impression die forgings,
and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are produced in a wide range of
alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that demand metals having
exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or abrasion, or a
combination of these characteristics.
18
Results of Operations
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first three months of 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
Sales for the first quarter 2009 were $831.6 million, a decrease of 38% compared to the first
quarter 2008, due to lower selling prices and shipments due to the challenging business conditions
resulting from the severe global economic recession. Compared to the 2008 first quarter, sales for
the 2009 first quarter decreased 19% in the High Performance Metals segment, 49% in the Flat-Rolled
Products segment, and 43% in the Engineered Products segment. Demand from the global aerospace and
defense, chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy and medical markets accounted
for nearly 79% of our first quarter 2009 sales. Aerospace and defense was the largest of our
markets at 34% of first quarter 2009 sales, with the chemical process industry and oil and gas
markets representing 21% of total sales and sales to the electrical energy market representing 20%.
Commercial aerospace continued to be impacted by schedule pushouts and uncertainties as the supply
chain adjusted to revised commercial airplane build schedules and reduced demand from the
aeroengine aftermarket. In the chemical process industry, our exotic alloys business benefited from
a solid backlog, but demand for many of our other products was soft due primarily to tight credit
markets and the global recession. In the oil and gas market, demand for our products for pipelines
and offshore projects was good. On the other hand, demand for downhole drilling weakened
considerably and projects for refineries and unconventional fuel, such as tar sands, remained
delayed primarily as a result of lower crude oil prices and tight credit markets. In the
electrical energy market, demand for our grain-oriented electrical steel was good, demand for our
industrial titanium products for electrical power plants remained at a high level, and demand for
our exotic alloys for nuclear energy applications continued to grow. Demand for our large castings
for wind energy applications was nearly nonexistent; however, early signs of a recovery began to
emerge. As expected, consumer-related markets, such as automotive, appliance, and residential
construction, were very weak.
For the first quarter 2009, direct international sales were $244.4 million, or nearly 30% of
total sales. Sales of our key high-value products (titanium alloys, exotic alloys, nickel-based
alloys and specialty alloys, and grain-oriented electrical steel) represented 69% of total sales.
ATI titanium product shipments, including ATI-produced products for our Uniti Titanium joint
venture, were 10.3 million pounds in the first quarter 2009, which represents 23% of total sales.
Segment operating profit for the first quarter 2009 was $55.9 million, or 6.7% of sales,
compared to $240 million, or 17.9% of sales, in the first quarter 2008. Segment operating profit
was adversely affected by the decline in selling prices and shipments due to the global economic
recession. The selling prices for many of our products include surcharges or indices by which we
attempt to match changes in raw material costs with shipments. The first quarter 2009 results were
negatively impacted by approximately $65 million in out-of-phase raw material surcharges and
indices due primarily to the rapid decrease in the cost of raw materials in the second half of the
fourth quarter 2008. This was partially offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of
$27.5 million as a result of the continuing decline in raw material costs in 2009. Results for the
first quarter 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $1.3 million. First
quarter 2009 benefited from gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of $34.8
million. Segment operating profit (loss) as a percentage of sales for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
(9.3 |
%) |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
19
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses,
net interest income or expense,
retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe segment
operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating results at
the business segment level.
Income before tax for the first quarter 2009 was $0.3 million compared to $221.6 million for
the first quarter 2008. In addition to the factors discussed above, income before tax was
adversely impacted by a $37.3 million increase in retirement benefit expenses resulting from lower
returns on benefit plan assets in 2008 notwithstanding the positive impact of the voluntary pension
contributions made over the last several years.
Net income attributable to ATI for the first quarter 2009 was $5.9 million, or $0.06 per
share, compared to the first quarter 2008 of $142.0 million, or $1.40 per share. First quarter
2009 results include an income tax benefit of $5.0 million compared to an income tax provision of
$77.9 million, or 35.2% of income before tax for the first quarter 2008. The 2009 first quarter
benefited from a lower income tax provision due primarily to $5.1 million of discrete adjustments
associated primarily with adjusting prior years estimated taxes. The 2008 first quarter included
a discrete benefit of $2.6 million related to foreign taxes.
We continued to maintain our solid balance sheet. We ended the 2009 first quarter with cash
on hand of $506 million, an increase of $36.1 million from year end 2008. This increase in cash
was after investing $108.6 million in self-funded capital projects, paying dividends of $17.6
million, and a reduction in borrowings of $5.6 million during the quarter. At the end of the 2009
first quarter, we had no borrowings under our $400 million domestic credit facility and no
significant near-term debt maturities. Total debt to total capitalization improved to 20.5%. Net
debt as a percentage of total capitalization was a negative 0.1% as cash on hand exceeded total
debt at the end of the 2009 first quarter.
As we look forward to the second quarter we remain cautious. While we see some signs of
stabilization in certain markets due to low inventory in the supply chain, demand for many of our
products remains at a very low level, the pricing environment is challenging, and demand visibility
is limited for many of our markets. The aerospace supply chain likely needs to further adjust to
recently announced commercial aircraft production plans and reduced aftermarket demand. We will
continue to adjust our production schedules and cost structures to market conditions through this
difficult and uncertain period. We expect the second quarter 2009 segment operating profit to be
negatively impacted by approximately $20 million from out-of-phase surcharges and indices.
Considering all the above, we expect ATIs second quarter 2009 earnings to be modestly better
than the first quarter 2009. In addition, we expect to end the second quarter 2009 with a
significant amount of cash on hand while continuing to self fund our capital investments.
We remain confident in the long-term growth potential of our core aerospace and infrastructure
markets that have been driving ATIs performance. We intend to use the current difficult market
conditions to continue to positively differentiate ATI as a uniquely positioned, diversified,
technology-driven global specialty metals company with unsurpassed manufacturing capabilities. Our
strategic direction and vision remain intact.
High Performance Metals Segment
Sales decreased 19% to $387.9 million, compared to the first quarter 2008. Demand for our
titanium alloys and our nickel-based alloys from the aerospace market was at lower levels as the
supply chain adjusted to aircraft production schedule pushouts and reduced demand from the
aeroengine aftermarket. Our exotic alloys business continued to benefit from a solid backlog from
the chemical process industry and the nuclear energy market.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 is provided in the following table:
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
6,938 |
|
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
9,970 |
|
|
|
9,537 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
22.48 |
|
|
$ |
25.54 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
14.74 |
|
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
57.08 |
|
|
$ |
44.61 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Shipments of titanium mill products decreased primarily due to lower demand from the
commercial aerospace market. Shipments of nickel-based and specialty alloys increased primarily
due to higher sales to the electrical energy market and oil and gas markets, which more than offset
reduced demand from the aeroengine market. Shipments for exotic alloys decreased primarily due to
product mix. Average selling prices for titanium and titanium alloys and nickel-based and specialty
alloys decreased, primarily due to lower raw material indices as a result of lower raw material
costs, and a more competitive pricing environment.
Segment operating profit in the quarter was $54.3 million, or 14.0% of sales, a $77.1 million
decrease compared to the first quarter 2008. The decrease in operating profit primarily resulted
from lower base-selling prices and shipments for most products and the negative impact of raw
material costs, primarily nickel and titanium, being higher than the raw material indices included
in our selling prices due to long manufacturing cycle times, which totaled approximately $17
million. These negative impacts were partially offset by higher margins on exotic alloys and the
benefits of gross cost reductions. There was no change in our LIFO inventory valuation reserve in
the 2009 first quarter. A LIFO inventory valuation charge of $1.3 million was recognized in the
first quarter 2008 in this segment. Results for the 2009 first quarter benefited from $20.5 million
of gross cost reductions.
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
First quarter 2009 sales were $378.2 million, 49% lower than the first quarter 2008. Demand
for certain high-value products, such as grain-oriented electrical steel and industrial titanium
products, was at reasonably good levels relative to economic conditions. Demand for most of our
stainless products was weak, particularly from consumer markets such as automotive, appliance, and
residential construction.
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
93,928 |
|
|
|
119,792 |
|
|
|
(22 |
)% |
Standard |
|
|
101,574 |
|
|
|
170,620 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
195,502 |
|
|
|
290,412 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
|
(42 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Average selling transaction prices, which include surcharges, were 25% lower due to a
combination of reduced raw material surcharges and lower base prices for most products due to a
more competitive pricing environment.
21
Segment operating profit decreased to $7.7 million, or 2.0% of sales, compared to $102.9
million, or 13.8% of sales, for the 2008 period. The decline in operating profit primarily
resulted from lower shipments and average base selling prices for most of our products and the
negative impact from $48 million of higher cost raw materials purchased in 2008 flowing through
cost of sales and not being in phase with raw material surcharges included in selling prices. This
was due primarily to the rapid decrease in raw material costs in the second half of the fourth
quarter 2008 and the long manufacturing times of some of our products. These negative impacts were
partially offset by a $26.2 million decrease in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve and the
benefits of gross cost reductions. There was no change in our LIFO inventory valuation reserve in
the first quarter 2008. Results for the 2009 first quarter benefited from $12.1 million in gross
cost reductions.
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the first quarter 2009 of $65.5 million were 43% lower than the first quarter 2008.
Demand for our tungsten and tungsten carbide products, forged products, and cast products was weak.
Demand for our titanium precision metal processing conversion services was stable. Segment
operating loss in the first quarter 2009 was $6.1 million, compared to operating profit of $5.7
million for the comparable 2008 period. The decline was primarily due to significantly reduced
demand and the impact of unabsorbed operating costs resulting from very low operating rates. The
first quarter 2009 results included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $1.3 million
primarily due to lower raw material costs. There was no change in our LIFO inventory valuation
reserve in the first quarter 2008. Results benefited from $2.2 million of gross cost reductions.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses decreased to $14.4 million for the first quarter of 2009, compared to $17.7
million in the year-ago period. This decrease is due primarily to lower expenses associated with
long-term performance-based cash incentive compensation programs.
First quarter 2009 interest income, net of interest expense, was $0.1 million compared $0.2
million for the same period last year. Interest expense benefited from the capitalization of
interest costs on strategic capital projects of $9.0 million in the first quarter 2009 and $5.7
million in the first quarter 2008.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other assets, and other non-operating income or expense. These items
are presented primarily in selling and administration expenses, and in other income (expense) in
the statement of income and resulted in other expense of $4.0 million for the first quarter of 2009
and $0.9 million for the first quarter of 2008. The increases primarily related to lower foreign
currency gains, and higher franchise and other non-income related taxes.
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension expense and other postretirement expense,
increased to $37.3 million in the first quarter 2009, compared to zero in the first quarter 2008.
This increase is primarily a result of lower returns on plan assets in 2008 notwithstanding the
positive benefits of the voluntary pension contributions made over the last several years. We now
expect 2009 retirement benefit expense to be approximately $149 million, compared to $8.4 million
of expense in 2008. For the full year, we now expect pension expense to be $126 million in 2009,
compared to pension income of $12.2 million in 2008. For the first quarter 2009, retirement benefit
expense included in cost of sales was $27.7 million and the amount included in selling and
administrative expenses was $9.6 million. For the first quarter 2008, the amount of retirement
benefit income included in cost of sales was $0.3 million, and the retirement benefit expense
included in selling and administrative expenses was $0.3 million.
Income Taxes
First quarter 2009 results include an income tax benefit of $5.0 million compared to an income
tax provision of $77.9 million, or 35.2% of income before tax, for the comparable 2008 quarter.
The 2009 first quarter benefited from a lower income tax provision due primarily to $5.1 million of
discrete adjustments associated primarily with prior years taxes. The 2008 first quarter included
a discrete $2.6 million benefit related to foreign taxes.
22
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years. We did not borrow
funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the first three months of 2009.
However, a portion of this facility is utilized to support letters of credit.
Our ability to access the credit markets in the future to obtain additional financing, if
needed, may be influenced by our credit rating. As of March 31, 2009, Moodys Investor Services
senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable ratings outlook. As of March
31, 2009, Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and senior unsecured debt rating for
our Company was BBB- with a stable ratings outlook. Changes in our credit rating do not impact our
access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We
have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)
of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, cash provided by operating activities was
$168.9 million, which benefited from a $216.2 million reduction in managed working capital due to
lower business activity and raw material costs. Investing activities included capital expenditures
of $108.6 million. Cash used in financing activities was $23.6 million in the first quarter 2009,
and included dividend payments of $17.6 million, and a reduction in borrowings of $5.6 million. At
March 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $506.0 million, an increase of $36.1 million from
year end 2008.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are managed separately. At March
31, 2009, managed working capital was 34.5% of annualized sales, compared to 35.2% of annualized
sales at December 31, 2008. During the first three months of 2009, managed working capital
decreased by $216.2 million, to $1,195.5 million. The decrease in managed working capital from
December 31, 2008, was due to decreased accounts receivable of $82.2 million, and decreased
inventory of $181.1 million, which was partially offset by decreased accounts payable of $47.1
million. While accounts receivable balances decreased during first quarter 2009, days sales
outstanding, which measures actual collection timing for accounts receivable, improved. Gross
inventory turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, remained
essentially constant across our High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products business segments
but declined in our Engineered Products segment due to significantly lower business activity.
The components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
448.8 |
|
|
$ |
530.5 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
746.2 |
|
|
|
887.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(232.6 |
) |
|
|
(278.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
962.4 |
|
|
|
1,139.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
LIFO reserves |
|
|
178.1 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
$ |
1,195.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,411.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior two months sales |
|
$ |
3,466.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,008.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of annualized sales |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in managed working capital from December
31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(216.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Capital Expenditures
We currently expect capital expenditures for 2009 will be in the range of approximately $425
million to $450 million, of which approximately $109 million was expended in the first three months
of 2009. We are significantly expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet expected demand from
the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense, chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical
energy, and medical markets, especially for titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys
and superalloys, specialty alloys, and exotic alloys. We are committed to continuing to self-fund
these projects and can further adjust the timing of any project, if necessary. These self-funded
capital investments include:
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities.
Titanium sponge is an important raw material used to produce our titanium mill products.
Our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge (jet engine rotating parts) facility in
Rowley, UT is expected to begin initial production in the 2009 third quarter. When the
Utah sponge facility is fully operational, our total annual sponge production capacity
including our Albany, OR sponge facility is projected to be approximately 46 million
pounds, and these secure supply sources are intended to reduce our purchased titanium
sponge and purchased titanium scrap requirements. In addition, the Utah facility will have
the infrastructure in place to further expand annual capacity by approximately 18 million
pounds, bringing the total annual capacity at that facility to 42 million pounds, if
needed. |
|
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing capabilities for titanium
and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys.
Announced projects include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy forging
capacity at our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an integrated 10,000 ton press
forge, 700mm rotary forge, and conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to produce
large diameter products needed for certain demanding applications. The conditioning,
finishing and inspection facilities began operations in the third quarter 2008, and the
forging operations are expected to be operational by the third quarter 2009. Forging is a
hot-forming process that produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar from an
ingot. |
|
|
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility at our existing
Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost approximately $1.16 billion and
take at least four years to complete. It is designed to produce exceptional quality,
thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require
lower working capital requirements. When completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty
metals hot rolling and processing facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing
capability and versatility in the production of a wide range of flat-rolled specialty
metals. We expect improved productivity, lower costs, and higher quality for our
diversified product mix of flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and
specialty alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision Rolled Strip®
products, and stainless sheet and coiled plate products. Our new advanced hot-rolling and
processing facility is designed to be the most powerful mill in the world for production of
specialty metals. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot bands of up to
78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing
facility, we announced the consolidation of our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel
melt shop into ATIs Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve
the overall productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and other
stainless and specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing slabs and ingots. The
investment should also result in significant reduction of particulate emissions. We expect
to realize considerable cost savings from this project to begin in late 2010. |
|
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions
of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting
capacity better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the
nuclear electrical energy and chemical process industry markets. |
|
|
|
|
Our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China in
late 2006. This expansion, which is expected to more than triple STALs rolling and
slitting capacity to produce Precision Rolled Strip products, is estimated to cost
approximately $100 million and is expected to be operational in the second quarter 2009. |
24
Debt
At March 31, 2009, we had $503.5 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $509.8 million
at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $6.3 million. The decrease in debt was primarily due to
scheduled debt maturity payments.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as a percentage of capitalization was a
negative 0.1% at March 31, 2009, compared to a positive 2.0% at December 31, 2008, as cash on hand
exceeded total debt at the end of the first quarter 2009. The net debt to capitalization was
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
503.5 |
|
|
$ |
509.8 |
|
Less: cash |
|
|
(506.0 |
) |
|
|
(469.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
1,951.0 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
1,948.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,997.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) to capital ratio |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Total debt to total capitalization improved to 20.5% at March 31, 2009 from 20.7% at December
31, 2008. Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
503.5 |
|
|
$ |
509.8 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
1,951.0 |
|
|
|
1,957.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
2,454.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,467.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capital ratio |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not borrow funds under our $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first three months of 2009, although approximately $12 million has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires us to maintain a
leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness divided by consolidated earnings before interest,
taxes and depreciation and amortization) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest
coverage ratio (consolidated earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest expense) of not
less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2009, our leverage ratio was 0.68, and our
interest coverage ratio was 66.06.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of March 31, 2009, $30 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a 585 million
renminbi (approximately $86 million at March 31, 2009 exchange rates) revolving credit facility
with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability
without any guarantees from the joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized in the
future for the expansion of STALs operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. As of March
31, 2009, there were no borrowings under this credit facility although STAL had approximately $5
million in letters of credit outstanding related to the expansion of its operations.
25
Dividends
A regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock was declared on February 19,
2009, payable on March 27, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 12,
2009. The payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed
relevant by our Board of Directors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash
requirements, future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit agreements or senior
securities, and other factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500
million. Repurchases of Company common stock are expected to be made on the open market or in
unsolicited or privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are expected to be funded from
internal cash flow and cash on hand. The number of shares to be purchased, and the timing of the
purchases, will be based on several factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of
cash balances, and general business conditions. No shares of common stock were purchased during the
three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been
purchased under this program at a cost of $339.5 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At March 31, 2009, we had net inventory of $746.2 million. Inventories are stated at the lower
of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or market,
less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing
and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued utilizing the
LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using average cost or FIFO
methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials and
production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
volatile. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the LIFO inventory costing methodology, a
rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our operating results, while conversely, a fall
in material costs results in a benefit to operating results. For example, in 2008, the effect of
falling raw material costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which
was $169.0 million lower than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to
value our inventory. In a period of rising prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is
generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a
period of declining raw material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower
than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels. For the first quarter 2009, we recognized a $27.5 million
benefit associated with utilizing the LIFO inventory valuation methodology.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be
comparable to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to
the differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory
valuation methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as
an expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At March 31, 2009, no
significant reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any
inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in more
than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the longer
manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
26
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectibility of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
As required, in the first quarter 2009, we adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160 (FAS 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
Early adoption of this standard was prohibited. FAS 160 changes the classification of
noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for and reporting of
transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under the
new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are reported as an element of
stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability sections of the balance sheet.
In addition, the practice of reporting minority interest expense or benefit changed. Under the new
standard, net income encompasses the total income before minority interest expense or benefit. The
income statement includes separate disclosure of the attribution of income or loss between the
controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and decreases in the noncontrolling ownership
interest amount are accounted for as equity transactions. As a result of adopting FAS 160, the
balance sheet and the income statement have been recast retrospectively for the presentation of
noncontrolling (minority) interest in our STAL joint venture.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS
157), Fair Value Measurements, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. The adoption of FAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, had no impact on the financial statements. The provisions of FAS 157 will be applied
at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is
required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been
calculated prior to the adoption of FAS 157.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted
in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 states that
unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the
computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. There was no impact to reported
earnings per share upon adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this
report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which we are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or
industry conditions generally, including credit market conditions and related issues, and
global supply and demand conditions and prices for our specialty metals; (b) material adverse
changes in the markets
27
we serve, including the aerospace and defense, construction and mining,
automotive, electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and gas, medical and other markets;
(c) our inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity improvements, synergies,
growth or other benefits anticipated by management, including those anticipated from strategic
investments and the integration of acquired businesses, whether due to significant increases in
energy, raw materials or employee benefits costs, the possibility of project cost overruns or
unanticipated costs and expenses, or other factors; (d) volatility of prices and availability of
supply of the raw materials that are critical to the manufacture of our products; (e) declines in
the value of our defined benefit pension plan assets or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations
that govern pension plan funding; (f) significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to
us; and (g) other risk factors summarized in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We
assume no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, foreign currencies, and
interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our counterparty to
these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items including consideration of counterparty risk and the
Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At March 31, 2009, we had approximately $40
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
2.0%. Approximately $26 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% increase in the
rate of interest on the $14 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap
would result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.1 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 10 to 12
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $10 to $12 million. We use several approaches to minimize any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy
prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and
using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At March 31, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to natural
gas cost volatility represented approximately 40% of our forecasted requirements for the next three
years. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at March 31, 2009 was an
unrealized pre-tax loss of $33.0 million, of which $18.2 million was presented in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities. The
effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the effects of natural gas hedging activity increased
cost of sales by $7.7 million.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2008 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $80
million. In addition, in 2008 we also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the
production of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in
increased costs of
28
approximately $5 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts
from time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain
that our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of March 31, 2009, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at the
request of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 7% of our total annual nickel
requirements through 2010. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included
in the selling price to the customer requesting the hedge over the designated hedge period. At
March 31, 2009, the net mark-to-market valuation of our outstanding raw material hedges was an
unrealized pre-tax loss of $27.6 million, of which $24.4 million is included in accrued liabilities
on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities.
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. At March 31, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our
exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros, represented approximately 8% of our forecasted total
international sales through 2011. In addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign
currencies as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions. At March 31, 2009, the net
mark-to-market valuation of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was an unrealized
pre-tax gain of $24.3 million, of which $10.7 million is included in other current assets on the
balance sheet, with the remainder included in other long-term assets.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as of March 31, 2009, and they concluded that these controls and
procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2009,
conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contract work, employment, employee benefits, environmental
and health and safety, and stockholder matters. Certain of such lawsuits, claims and proceedings
are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and addressed
in Note 11 to the unaudited interim financial statements included herein. While the outcome of
litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings
may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any
such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations for that
period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period
covered by this report, including shares repurchased by ATI from employees to satisfy employee-owed
taxes on share-based payments.
ATIs Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million on November 1,
2007. Repurchases of Company common stock are made in the open market or in unsolicited or
privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are funded from internal cash flow and cash on
hand. The number of shares purchased, and the timing of the purchases, are based on several
factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business
conditions. No shares of common stock were purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2009, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this program at a
cost of $339.5 million. All of these purchases were made in the open market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Units) that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
January 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
34,308 |
|
|
$ |
21.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
February 1-28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
March 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
34,308 |
|
|
$ |
21.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
30
Item 6. Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Key Executive Performance Plan Agreement dated February 18,
2009, including Key Executive Performance Plan, as amended February 18, 2009 (filed
herewith)*. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of Total Shareholder Return Incentive Compensation Program Award
Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 (filed herewith)*. |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Form of Performance/Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 18, 2009
(filed herewith)*. |
|
|
10.4 |
|
2009 Annual Incentive Plan (filed herewith)*. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this
Report. |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Richard J. Harshman |
|
|
|
Richard J. Harshman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2009 |
By
|
/s/ Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Key Executive Performance Plan Agreement dated February 18,
2009, including Key Executive Performance Plan, as amended February 18, 2009. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of Total Shareholder Return Incentive Compensation Program Award
Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009. |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Form of Performance/Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 18, 2009. |
|
|
10.4 |
|
2009 Annual Incentive Plan. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
33