Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

OR

For the transition period from                    to                 .

Commission file number 0001-34145

Primoris Services Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 740-5600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

At May 7, 2012, 51,478,006 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 1—Business Activity

Organization and operations — Primoris Services Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries ARB, Inc. (“ARB”), ARB Structures, Inc., All Day Electric Company, Inc., Onquest, Inc., Born Heaters Canada, ULC, Cardinal Contractors, Inc., GML Coatings, LLC, Stellaris, LLC, James Construction Group LLC (“JCG”) and Rockford Corporation, collectively, are engaged in various construction and product engineering activities. The Company’s underground and directional drilling operations install, replace and repair natural gas, petroleum, telecommunications and water pipeline systems, including large diameter pipeline systems. The Company’s industrial, civil and engineering operations build and provide maintenance services to industrial facilities including power plants, petrochemical facilities, and other processing plants, and construct multi-level parking structures, engage in the construction of highways, bridges and other environmental construction activities. The Company is incorporated in the State of Delaware and in 2011 moved its corporate headquarters from Lake Forest, California to 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

On March 12, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”).  Headquartered in Pearland (near Houston), Texas, Sprint provides a comprehensive range of pipeline construction, maintenance, upgrade, fabrication and specialty services primarily in the southeastern United States.  The Company formed Primoris Energy Services Corporation, a Texas corporation, to facilitate the acquisition.  The purchase agreement allows the Company to use the Sprint name for three years.

Unless specifically noted otherwise, as used throughout these condensed consolidated financial statements, “Primoris”, or “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or “its” refers to the business, operations and financial results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements — The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As such, certain disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the Company’s latest audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 (the “First Quarter 2012 Report”) should be read in concert with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 5, 2012, which contains the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The interim financial information for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements. However, the financial statements contained in this First Quarter 2012 Report do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial information.

Revenue recognition — The Company typically structures contracts as unit-price, time and material, fixed-price or cost reimbursable plus fee. Revenue is recognized on the cost-on-total-cost percentage-of-completion method for fixed price contracts.  In the percentage-of-completion method, estimated contract income and resulting revenue is calculated based on the total costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs. Total estimated costs, and thus contract revenues and income, can be impacted by changes in productivity, scheduling, the unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment. Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs, client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect the progress of a project’s completion and thus the timing of revenue recognition. If an estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full at the time of the estimate.

The caption “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” represents the excess of contract revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method over billings to date. For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, such excesses are included in the caption “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”.

7

Table of Contents

Revenues on cost-plus and time and materials contracts are recognized as the related work is completed.

In accordance with applicable terms of construction contracts, certain retainage provisions may be withheld by customers until completion and acceptance of the project. Final payments of the majority of such amounts are expected to be receivable in the following operating cycle.

Significant revision in contract estimate—As previously discussed, revenue recognition is based on the percentage-of-completion method for firm fixed-price contracts. Under this method, the costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs are used to calculate the revenue to be recognized. Total estimated costs, and thus contract income, are impacted by many factors.

For projects that were in process in the prior year, but are either completed or continue to be in process during the current year, there can be a difference in revenues and profits related to the prior year, had current year estimates of costs to complete been known in the prior year.

Customer Concentration — The Company operates in multiple industry segments encompassing the construction of commercial, industrial and public works infrastructure assets throughout primarily the United States. Typically, the top ten customers in any one calendar year generate revenues in excess of 50% of total revenues and consist of a different group of customers in each year.   During the three months ending March 31, 2012, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $179.4 million, which represented 61.5% of total revenues during the period.  During that period, the Louisiana DOT represented 15.2% of total revenues and a large gas and electric utility represented 11.7% of total revenues. During the three months ending March 31, 2011, revenues generated by Rockford under the Ruby contract were $126.9 million, which represented 35.3% of total revenues during the period.  The Ruby contract was part of a large project for the construction of a natural gas pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon. The contract was a cost reimbursable plus a fixed fee arrangement, and field work was substantially completed by the end of the third quarter 2011.

Multiemployer Plans — The Company participates and contributes to a number of multiemployer benefit plans for its union employees at rates determined by the various collective bargaining agreements.  Each plan’s trustees determine the eligibility and allocations of contributions and benefit amounts, determine the types of benefits and administer the plan.  The potential withdrawal obligation may be significant.  Any withdrawal liability would be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP.  In November 2011, the Company withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan and recorded a $5 million withdrawal liability as of December 31, 2011.  The Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements.

Note 3—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Disclosures

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which provides amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The objective of ASU 2011-04 is to create common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments clarify existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and make changes to particular principles or requirements for measuring or disclosing information about fair value measurements.  The Company adopted ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill or Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 provides an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that the fair value is not less than its carrying amount, then it is not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test.  An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some or all of its reporting units.  An entity can also bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.  ASU 2011-08 also includes new qualitative indicators that replace those currently used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required to be performed. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2012 which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

8

Table of Contents

Note 4—Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC Topic 820 addresses fair value GAAP for financial assets and financial liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period and for non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

In general, fair values determined by Level 1 use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are “unobservable data points” for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels identified under ASC Topic 820, the Company’s financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Short-term investments consist primarily of Certificates of Deposit (“CDs”) purchased through the CDARS (Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service) process and U.S. Treasury bills with various financial institutions that are backed by the federal government FDIC program.

Other financial instruments of the Company consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities.  These financial instruments generally approximate fair value based on the short-term nature of these instruments.  The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities.

Note 5—Accounts Receivable

The following is a summary of the Company’s accounts receivable at the dates shown:

Note 6—Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts

Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following at:

9

Table of Contents

This amount is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the following captions:

Note 7—Equity Method Investments

WesPac Energy LLC

On July 1, 2010, the Company acquired a 50% membership interest in WesPac Energy LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“WesPac”), with Kealine Holdings, LLC (“Kealine”), a Nevada limited liability company.  Kealine holds the remaining 50% membership interest in WesPac.  We have no future obligation to make any additional investments into WesPac. All key investment, management and operating decisions of WesPac will require unanimous approval from a management committee equally represented by Kealine and us.  The Company believes the ownership interest in WesPac will broaden our exposure to a variety of pipeline, terminal and energy-related infrastructure opportunities across North America.

The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

At the end of 2011, a major oil refining third party terminated two potential projects.  WesPac was entitled to reimbursement of certain costs incurred, but expensed $5.4 million of non-reimbursed project development costs and reserves for assets not recoverable.  In December 2011, the Company recorded its 50% share of the expense as required by the equity method of accounting.  The Company also recorded a reduction of $1.7 million of its $5.0 million basis difference, to recognize an estimate for an other than temporary decrease in the value of its basis difference between the Company’s original investment and its pro-rata share of the WesPac equity.  In March 2012, the third party reimbursed WesPac for its share of the terminated project costs.

10

Table of Contents

St.—Bernard Levee Partners

The Company purchased a 30% interest in St.—Bernard Levee Partners (“Bernard”) in the fourth quarter 2009 for $300 and accounts for this investment under the equity method. Bernard engages in construction activities in Louisiana.  Bernard distributed $4,200 and $3,934 to its equity holders during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of which, the Company’s share, as calculated under the joint venture agreement, was $1,260 and $970 for the same periods in 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

Note 8 — Business Combinations

On March 12, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”).  Headquartered in Pearland (near Houston), Texas, Sprint provides a comprehensive range of pipeline construction, maintenance, upgrade, fabrication and specialty services primarily in the southeastern United States.  The Company formed Primoris Energy Services Corporation, a Texas corporation, to facilitate the acquisition.  The purchase agreement allows the Company to use the Sprint name for three years.

The fair value of the consideration transferred to selling shareholders consisted of the following:

On the closing date, we paid the sellers $19,228 in cash.  The purchase agreement requires a final adjustment for the net book value of assets acquired at closing.  At March 31, 2012, we accrued an additional $2,116 for the assets purchased.  Both parties are reviewing the estimate, and we expect to make a final payment in the second quarter of 2012.

We issued the sellers 62,052 shares of our common stock with a contractually agreed upon value of $1,000 based on the average closing price of our common stock for the 20 business days prior to the closing date.  The fair value of the stock issued was $980 based on the stock price on the closing date.

As part of the acquisition, the Company agreed to issue additional cash to the sellers, contingent upon Sprint meeting certain operating performance targets for the remainder of 2012 and for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013.  As discussed in Note 12 — “Contingent Earnout Liabilities”, the estimated fair value of the contingency was $6,200 on the acquisition date, and $6,233 as of March 31, 2012.

11

Table of Contents

The acquisition of Sprint was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  Accordingly, the assets acquired are measured at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed:

The significant identifiable tangible assets include primarily accounts receivable and property, plant and equipment.  The Company determined that the book value of accounts receivable reflects fair value of those assets.  The Company estimated the fair value of fixed assets on the effective date of the acquisition.  The valuations were based on comparable market values for equipment of similar condition and age.

We requested the assistance of third-parties to determine the fair value of the intangible assets acquired for the acquisition.  Because of the short period of time from the date of the Sprint acquisition to the end of the quarter and because the final purchase price has not yet been finalized, the final determination of the assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has not been completed.

The following valuation estimates are preliminary and subject to change. The fair value measurements of the intangible assets were based primarily on significant unobservable inputs and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in Note 3 — “Fair Value Measurements”. Based on the Company’s assessment, the acquired intangible assets categories, fair value and average amortization periods, generally on a straight-line basis, are as follows:

The fair value of the tradename was determined based on the “relief from royalty” method, which was selected based on external research of third party trade name licensing agreements and their royalty rate levels and management estimates.  The useful life was based on the agreement providing for the use of the Sprint tradename for three years.

The fair value for the non-compete agreements was based on a discounted “income approach” model, including estimated financial results with and without the non-compete agreements in place.  The agreements were analyzed based on the potential impact of competition that certain individuals could have on the financial results, assuming the agreements were not in place.  An estimate of the probability of competition was applied and the results were compared to a similar model assuming the agreements were in place.

The customer relationships were valued utilizing the “excess earnings method” of the income approach.  The estimated discounted cash flows associated with existing customers and projects were based on historical and market participant data.  Such discounted cash flows were net of fair market returns on the various tangible and intangible assets that are necessary to realize the potential cash flows.

Goodwill largely consists of expected benefits from the geographic expansion and presence of Sprint in the Gulf Coast of the United States and its energy-related opportunities for specialized pipeline construction and related services.  Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce of the Sprint business.  Based on the current tax treatment of the Sprint acquisition, goodwill and other intangible assets are deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.

12

Table of Contents

Note 9—Intangible Assets

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, intangible assets totaled $33,875 and $32,021, respectively, net of amortization.  The March 31, 2012 balance includes the effect of the Sprint acquisition (See Note 8).  The table below summarizes the intangible asset categories, amounts and the average amortization periods, which are generally on a straight-line basis, as follows:

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $1,746 and $2,765 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:

Note 10—Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accounts payable included retention amounts of approximately $14,786 and $13,980, respectively.  These amounts due to subcontractors have been retained pending contract completion and customer acceptance of jobs.

The following is a summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities at:

Note 11—Credit Arrangements

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with The PrivateBank and Trust Company (the “Lender”) for a revolving line of credit in the total aggregate amount of $35,000.  The maturity dates, as amended, are as follows:

·                   a revolving loan in the amount of $20,000 (the “Revolving Loan A”), with a maturity date of October 26, 2014; and

·                   a revolving loan in the amount of $15,000 (the “Revolving Loan B”), with a maturity date of October 25, 2012.

13

Table of Contents

Under the Agreement, the Lender agreed to issue letters of credit of up to $15,000 under Revolving Loan A.  As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, total commercial letters of credit outstanding under Revolving Loan A totaled $4,603 and $4,009, respectively.  Other than the commercial letters of credit, there were no borrowings under these two lines of credit during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.  At March 31, 2012, available borrowing capacity under Revolving Loan A was $15,397 and under Revolving Loan B was $15,000.

The principal amount of each of Revolving Loan A and Revolving Loan B will bear interest at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as specified in the Agreement, or (ii) the prime rate announced by the Lender plus an applicable margin as specified in the Agreement. The principal amount of any loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin may not be prepaid without being subject to certain penalties. There is no prepayment penalty for any loan bearing interest at the prime rate announced by the Lender plus an applicable margin.

All loans made by the Lender under the Agreement are secured by our assets, including, among others, our cash, inventory, equipment (excluding equipment subject to certain permitted liens) and accounts receivable. Certain of our subsidiaries have executed joint and several guaranties in favor of the Lender for all amounts under the Agreement.  The Agreement and the line of credit facilities contain various restrictive covenants, including, among others, restrictions on investments, capital expenditures, minimum tangible net worth and debt service coverage requirements.  The Company was in compliance with the bank covenants as of March 31, 2012.

The Company has a credit facility with a Canadian bank for purposes of issuing commercial letters of credit in Canada, for an amount of up to $10,000 in Canadian dollars. The credit facility has an annual renewal and provides for the issuance of commercial letters of credit for a term of up to five years. The facility provides for an annual fee of 1% for any issued and outstanding commercial letters of credit. Letters of credit can be denominated in either Canadian or U.S. dollars. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, total commercial letters of credit outstanding under this credit facility totaled $1,432 and $4,036 in Canadian dollars, respectively.  As of March 31, 2012, the available borrowing capacity under this credit facility was $8,568 in Canadian dollars. The credit facility contains a working capital restrictive covenant for our Canadian subsidiary, Born Heaters Canada.  As of March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the bank covenant.

In 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Bank of the West whereby the Company agrees to maintain a cash balance at the bank equal to the full amount of certain commercial letters of credit.  At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the amount of letters of credit with a maturity of twelve months and the related restricted cash amounted to $3,823 and $3,823, respectively, and is included as part of customer retention deposits and restricted cash on the balance sheet.

Subordinated Promissory Note — Rockford.  In connection with the acquisition of Rockford, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note (the “Rockford Note”) on November 12, 2010 in favor of the sellers of Rockford with an initial principal amount of $16,712.  The principal amount of the Rockford Note was divided into two portions.  Approximately $9,669 of the Rockford Note was designated as “Note A,” and approximately $7,043 of the note was designated as “Note B.”  Note B was paid in full on March 10, 2011.

Note A is due and payable on October 31, 2013 and bears interest at different rates until maturity, averaging 6.67% over its life. During the first 12 months, Note A bore interest at a rate equal to 5%.  For months 13 through 24, it bears interest at a rate equal to 7%. Thereafter and until maturity, Note A bears interest at a rate equal to 8%.  Payments of principal and interest are payable monthly in an amount of $269 principal plus interest over 36 months.  At March 31, 2012, a total of $5,640 was outstanding.

Note A may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time.  If we complete an equity financing while Note A is outstanding, we have agreed to use 15% of the net proceeds in excess of $10 million to prepay a portion or all of Note A.  In addition, we have agreed to use 33% of any cash proceeds raised in connection with incurrence of any indebtedness (other than under a bank line of credit or to finance operating expenses, equipment and capital expenditures) to prepay a portion or all of Note A.

While any amount is outstanding under Note A, we have agreed not to take certain actions without the prior written consent of the Rockford Note holders’ representative.  We have agreed not to: (i) incur any obligations for seller financing associated with the acquisition of a business without subordinating it to the Rockford Note, (ii) make any payment on outstanding indebtedness that has been subordinated to the Rockford Note, (iii) make any distribution or declare or pay any dividends (except for regular, quarterly dividends), and (iv) consummate any transaction that would require prepayment under the Rockford Note, if we are not permitted to do so by our senior lender and/or surety companies.

14

Table of Contents

The sellers have entered into subordination agreements with our senior lender, bonding agency and the holders of the JCG Note, pursuant to which the Rockford Note is subordinated to amounts owed to our senior lender, bonding agencies and the holders of the JCG Note.

In November 2011, the Company placed $5 million in an interest bearing escrow account in lieu of making future payments in that amount to the holders of Rockford’s Note A.  As permitted by the terms of the Rockford Agreement, the amount will remain in escrow until resolution of a dispute related to a certain liability at the time of the closing of the transaction.  The Company has included this escrow amount on its March 31, 2012 balance sheet as “customer retention deposits and restricted cash.”

Subordinated Promissory Note — JCG.  In connection with the acquisition of JCG, the Company executed an unsecured, subordinated promissory note on December 18, 2009 in favor of the sellers of JCG with an initial principal amount of $53,500. The JCG Note was due and payable on December 15, 2014 and bore interest at differing rates until maturity.  The JCG note was paid in full on March 12, 2012.

Note 12 — Contingent Earnout Liabilities

Sprint Earnout Consideration

As part of the Sprint acquisition on March 12, 2012, the Company agreed to issue additional cash to the sellers, contingent upon Sprint meeting certain operating performance targets for the remainder of 2012 and for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013.

The 2012 earnout target is measured by income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the purchase agreement, for the remainder of the calendar year 2012.  If 2012 EBITDA is at least $7.0 million, we have agreed to pay $4.0 million in cash to the sellers.  The estimated fair value of the 2012 potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $3.45 million.

The 2013 earnout target provides for an additional cash payment of $4.0 million to the sellers if 2013 EBITDA is at least $7.75 million.  The estimated fair value of the 2013 potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $2,745.

At March 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration for the 2012 earnout was $3,474 and for the 2013 earnout target, it was $2,759.

Rockford Earnout Consideration

As part of the Rockford acquisition in November 2010, the Company agreed to issue additional cash and common stock to the sellers, contingent upon Rockford meeting certain operating performance targets for the fourth quarter 2010, for the five quarters ending December 31, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2012. The maximum amount of this consideration was $18.4 million, which, when measured on a fair value basis as of the acquisition date, was estimated at $14.3 million and was classified as a liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The 2010 earnout target for the fourth quarter 2010 was achieved, and in March 2011, the Company issued 494,095 shares of common stock to the sellers, reducing the liability and increasing stockholders’ equity.

The 2011 earnout target was achieved and the liability as of December 31, 2011 was $6,900.  In April 2012, the Company issued 232,637 shares of common stock to the sellers and made cash payment of $3.45 million.  The stock component of the earnout was based on the Company’s average closing stock price during the month of December 2011 of $14.83 per share.  The April 2012 cash payment reduced the liability, and the stock component reduced the liability and increased stockholders’ equity in the second quarter 2012.

A final contingent earnout liability exists for 2012 based on Rockford’s financial performance as measured by income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the purchase agreement, for the calendar year 2012.  If 2012 EBITDA is at least $14.0 million, we would pay $6.9 million in cash to the sellers in 2013.

At March 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration for the 2012 earnout was $5,993, and it was $5,818 as of December 31, 2011.  The $175 change in the fair value of this liability was a non-cash charge to “other expense” in the consolidated statement of income for the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

15

Table of Contents

JCG Earnout Consideration

As part of the JCG acquisition in December 2009, the Company agreed to issue shares of common stock equal to $10.2 million if JCG’s EBITDA, as defined in the purchase agreement, was equal to or greater than $35 million for the year ending December 31, 2010. The earnout contingency was achieved and in March 2011, the Company issued 1,095,602 shares of common stock to the sellers.

Note 13—Related Party Transactions

Primoris has entered into various transactions with Stockdale Investment Group, Inc. (“SIGI”).  Brian Pratt, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors and our largest stockholder, also holds a majority interest and is the chairman, president and chief executive officer and a director of SIGI.  John M. Perisich, our Senior Vice President and General Counsel, is secretary of SIGI.  Primoris leases properties located in Bakersfield, Pittsburg and San Dimas, California, and in Pasadena, Texas from SIGI. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid $231 and $224, respectively, in lease payments to SIGI for the use of these properties.

The Company entered into a $6.1 million agreement in 2010 to construct a wastewater facility for Pluris, LLC, a private company in which Brian Pratt holds the majority interest.  The transaction was reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.  The project was substantially completed at December 31, 2011.  During the three months ending March 31, 2012 the Company recognized related party revenues of $291 and $1,975 for the same period in the prior year.

Primoris leases a property from Roger Newnham, one of our stockholders and a manager of our subsidiary Born Heaters Canada. The property is located in Calgary, Canada. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, Primoris paid $72 and $69, respectively, in lease payments to Mr. Newnham for the use of this property. The term of the lease is through December 31, 2014.

As a result of the November 2010 acquisition of Rockford, the Company entered into a lease for property from Lemmie Rockford, one of our stockholders.  The property is located in Toledo, Washington.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, Primoris paid $23 and $23, respectively, in lease payments to Mr. Rockford for the use of this property.  The lease expires on January 15, 2015.

Note 14—Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was 38.50%. The rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to state income taxes and the “Domestic Production Activity Deduction”.

To determine its quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as an income tax expense.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is presently conducting an examination of our federal income tax returns for 2008 and 2009.  The tax years 2008 through 2011 remain open to examination by the IRS.  The statute of limitations of state and foreign jurisdictions vary generally between 3 to 5 years.  Accordingly, the tax years 2006 through 2010 generally remain open to examination by the other major taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Note 15—Dividends and Earnings Per Share

On November 3, 2011, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on December 31, 2011.  The dividend, totaling $1,537, was paid on January 16, 2012.  On February 24, 2012, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on March 30, 2012.  The dividend, totaling $1,537, was paid on April 16, 2012.

16

Table of Contents

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

(1)                      Represents the dilutive effect of common stock warrants available under the Unit Purchase Option (“UPO”).  See Note 16 — “Stockholders’ Equity”.

(2)                      Represents the dilutive effect of the following contingency arrangements which were met at the end of each year, but for which shares of common stock were not issued until the end of the first quarter:

a)              A total of 232,637 shares issued to Rockford’s former stockholders in April 2012 as a result of Rockford meeting a defined performance target in 2011.  The purchase agreement provides for additional performance targets for 2012, however, the consideration is for cash payments only.

b)             A total of 494,095 shares issued to Rockford’s former stockholders in March 2011 as a result of Rockford meeting a defined performance target in 2010.

c)              A total of 1,095,646 shares issued to JCG’s sellers in March 2011 as a result of JCG meeting a defined performance target in 2010.

(3)                      Represents the effect of 94,966 shares of common stock issued to managers and executives of the Company under a purchase arrangement within the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity

Common stock — In March 2012, the Company issued 111,790 shares of common stock to managers and executives of the Company under a purchase arrangement within the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.  The Company issued 12,395 shares of common stock in February 2012 as part of the quarterly compensation of non-employee members of the Board of Directors.  Additionally, as part of the acquisition of Sprint, the Company issued 62,052 shares of common stock in March 2012.

In April 2012, the Company issued 232,637 shares of common stock to the Rockford sellers as a result of Rockford meeting a defined performance target in 2011.

The Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may, from time to time and depending on market conditions, share price and other factors, acquire shares of its common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions up to an aggregate purchase price of $20 million.  The share repurchase program expires December 31, 2012.

Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies

Leases — The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases which expire at various dates through 2019. The leases require the Company to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities and are classified as operating leases in accordance with ASC Topic 840 “Leases”.

17

Table of Contents

Total lease expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $2,242 and $2,286, respectively, including amounts paid to related parties of $325 and $314, respectively.

Letters of credit — At March 31, 2012, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $9,857 and at December 31, 2011, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $11,798.  The outstanding amounts include the U.S. dollar equivalents for letters of credit issued in Canadian dollars.

Litigation— The Company is subject to claims and legal proceedings arising out of its business. Management believes that the Company has meritorious defenses to such claims. Although management is unable to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, after review and consultation with counsel and taking into consideration relevant insurance coverage and related deductibles, management believes that the outcome of these matters will not have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company.

Bonding— At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had bid and completion bonds issued and outstanding totaling approximately $1,070,378 and $1,105,933, respectively.

Note 18—Reportable Operating Segments

The Company segregates the business into three operating segments: the East Construction Services segment, the West Construction Services segment and the Engineering segment.

The East Construction Services segment incorporates the JCG construction business, located primarily in the southeastern United States.  The segment also includes the businesses located in the Gulf Coast region of the United States, including Cardinal Contractors, Inc. The segment also includes the operating results relating to the acquisition of certain assets and certain liabilities of Sprint Pipeline Services on March 12, 2012.

The West Construction Services segment includes the construction services performed in the western United States, primarily in the states of California and Oregon.  Entities included in West Construction Services are ARB, ARB Structures, Inc., Rockford, Alaska Continental Pipeline, Inc., All Day Electric Company, Inc., Primoris Renewables, Inc., Juniper Rock, Inc. and Stellaris, LLC.

The Engineering segment includes the results of Onquest, Inc. and Born Heaters Canada, ULC.

All intersegment revenues and gross profit, which were immaterial, have been eliminated in the following tables.

Segment Revenues

Revenue by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

Segment Gross Profit

Gross profit by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

18

Table of Contents

Segment Goodwill

The following presents the amount of goodwill recorded by segment at March 31, 2012 and at December 31, 2011.

Geographic Region — Revenues and Total Assets

Revenue and total assets by geographic area for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

All non-United States revenue has been generated in the Engineering Segment.  For the table above, revenues generated by OnQuest’s Canadian subsidiary, Born Heaters Canada, ULC, were used to determine non-United States revenues.

19

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 (“First Quarter 2012 Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of regulation and the economy, generally. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “potential”, “predicts”, “projects”, “should”, “will”, “would” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in detail in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this First Quarter 2012 Report. You should read this First Quarter 2012 Report, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and our other filings with the SEC completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto included in Part 1, Item 1 of this First Quarter 2012 Report.

Introduction

Primoris is a holding company of various subsidiaries, which form one of the larger publicly traded specialty contractors and infrastructure companies in the United States.  Serving diverse end-markets, Primoris provides a wide range of construction, fabrication, maintenance, replacement, water and wastewater, and engineering services to major public utilities, petrochemical companies, energy companies, municipalities, and other customers. With our acquisitions of JCG in December 2009 and Rockford in November 2010, Primoris has doubled its size and the Company’s national footprint now extends from Florida, along the Gulf Coast, through California, into the Pacific Northwest and Canada.  In March 2012, we acquired Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”), providing a comprehensive range of pipeline construction, maintenance, upgrade, fabrication and specialty services primarily in the southeastern United States.

We install, replace, repair and rehabilitate natural gas, refined product, water and wastewater pipeline systems, large diameter gas and liquid pipeline facilities, highway and heavy civil projects, earthwork and site development and also construct mechanical facilities and other structures, including power plants, petrochemical facilities, refineries and parking structures.  In addition, we provide maintenance services, including inspecting, overhaul and emergency repair services, to cogeneration plants, refineries and similar mechanical facilities.  Through our subsidiary OnQuest, Inc., we provide engineering and design services for fired heaters and furnaces primarily used in refinery applications. Through our subsidiary Cardinal Contractors, Inc., we construct water and wastewater facilities in the southeastern United States.

We make our press releases, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and all other required filings with the SEC available free of charge through our Internet Web site, as soon as reasonably practical after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our principal executive offices are located at 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201, and our telephone number is (214) 740-5600. Our Web site address is www.prim.com. The information on our Internet Web site is neither part of nor incorporated by reference into this First Quarter 2012 Report.

20

Table of Contents

Range of Services

The Company segregates the business into three operating segments: the East Construction Services segment, the West Construction Services segment and the Engineering segment.

East and West Construction Services

Both the East Construction Services and the West Construction Services segments specialize in a range of services that include designing, building/installing, replacing, repairing/rehabilitating and providing management services for construction related projects. Our services include:

·                                    Providing installation of underground pipeline, cable and conduits for entities in the petroleum, petrochemical and water industries;

·                                    Providing installation and maintenance of industrial facilities for entities in the petroleum, petrochemical and water industries;

·                                    Providing installation of complex commercial and industrial cast-in-place structures; and

·                                     Providing construction of highways and industrial and environmental construction.

East Construction Services

The East Construction Services segment incorporates the JCG construction business, located primarily in the southeastern United States.  The segment also includes the businesses located in the Gulf Coast region of the United States, including Cardinal Contractors, Inc.  The segment also includes the operating results of  Sprint since March 12, 2012.

West Construction Services

The West Construction Services segment includes the construction services performed in the western United States, primarily in the state of California.  Entities included in West Construction Services are ARB Inc., ARB Structures, Inc., Rockford, Alaska Continental Pipeline, Inc., All Day Electric Company, Inc., Primoris Renewables, Inc., Juniper Rock, Inc. and Stellaris, LLC.

Engineering

The Engineering segment includes the results of Onquest, Inc. and Born Heaters Canada, ULC.  The Engineering group specializes in designing, supplying, and installing high-performance furnaces, heaters, burner management systems and related combustion and process technologies for clients in the oil refining, petrochemical and power generation industries. The group furnishes turnkey project management with technical expertise and the ability to deliver custom engineering solutions worldwide.

Material trends and uncertainties

We generate our revenue from both large and small construction and engineering projects. The award of these contracts is dependent on a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. Business in the construction industry is cyclical. We depend in part on spending by companies in the energy and oil and gas industries, as well as on municipal water and wastewater customers. Over the past several years, each segment has benefited from demand for more efficient and more environmentally friendly energy and power facilities, local highway and bridge needs and from the strength of the oil and gas industry; however, each of these industries and the government agencies periodically are adversely affected by macroeconomic conditions.  Economic factors outside of our control affect the amount and size of contracts in any particular period.

We and our customers are operating in a challenging business environment in light of the on-going economic uncertainty and weak capital markets.  We are closely monitoring our customers and the effect that changes in economic and market conditions may have on them. We have experienced reduced spending by some of our customers over the last several years, which we attribute to negative economic and market conditions, and we anticipate that these negative conditions may continue to affect demand for our services in the near-term.  However, we believe that most of our customers, some of whom are regulated utilities, remain financially stable in general and will be able to continue with their business plans in the long-term without substantial constraints.

21

Table of Contents

Seasonality and cyclicality

Our results of operations can be subject to quarterly variations. Some of the variation is the result of weather, particularly rain, which can impact Primoris’ ability to perform construction services.  The weather also limits our ability to bid for and perform pipeline integrity testing and routine maintenance for our utility customer’s underground systems since the systems are used for heating.  In most years, utility owners obtain bids and award contracts for major maintenance, integrity and replacement work after the heating season, and the work must be completed by the following winter.  In addition, demand for new projects can be lower during the early part of the year due to clients’ internal budget cycles. As a result, we usually experience higher revenues and earnings in the third and fourth quarters of the year as compared to the first two quarters. We are also dependent on large construction projects which tend not to be seasonal, but can fluctuate from year to year based on general economic conditions. Because of the cyclical nature of its business, the financial results for any period may fluctuate from prior periods, and our financial condition and operating results may vary from quarter-to-quarter.  Results from one quarter may not be indicative of our financial condition or operating results for any other quarter or for an entire year.

Our industry can be highly cyclical. As a result, our volume of business may be adversely affected by declines or delays in new projects in various geographic regions in the United States. Project schedules, in particular in connection with larger, longer-term projects, can also create fluctuations in the services provided, which may adversely affect us in a given period. The financial condition of our customers and their access to capital, variations in the margins of projects performed during any particular period, regional, national and global economic and market conditions, timing of acquisitions, the timing and magnitude of acquisition assimilation costs, interest rate fluctuations and other factors may also materially affect our periodic results. Accordingly, our operating results for any particular period may not be indicative of the results that can be expected for any other period.

Results of operations

Revenues, gross profit, operating income and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows: