UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________



FORM 10‑Q

___________________________________



(MARK ONE)



For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2016



OR





Commission File Number 1-13419

__________________________________



Lindsay Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

___________________________________





402‑829-6800

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

___________________________________



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒   No ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ☒   No ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: 





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ☐   No ☒



As of December 16, 2016, 10,653,479 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.



 



 

---

 

Lindsay Corporation

INDEX FORM 10-Q









 

---

 

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1 - Financial Statements

    



 

---

 

          



 

---

 

              



 

---

 

     

 

---

 

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.



In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.  The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using U.S. GAAP. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation.

 

Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements



In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date. The standard provides a single model for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance. The ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of goods or services. The ASU will replace existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP and becomes effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted only in fiscal 2018. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method, nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.



In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The standard requires an entity to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. In addition, companies will no longer allocate valuation allowances between current and noncurrent because all deferred tax assets will be classified as noncurrent.  The guidance allows companies to apply the update either on a retrospective or prospective basis. The Company has early adopted this ASU during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 on a retrospective basis.  Accordingly, the Company reclassified current deferred tax assets and liabilities to non-current on its November 30, 2015 and August 31, 2016 condensed consolidated balance sheets, which increased net non-current deferred tax assets by $2.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and decreased non-current deferred tax liabilities by $10.3 million and $12.0 million, respectively.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities arising from an operating lease on the balance sheet. Additionally, companies are permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less.  The effective date of ASU No. 2016-02 will be the first quarter of fiscal 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  The standard provides guidance for employee share-based compensation payments, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and the classification on the statement of cash flows.  The Company elected to early adopt this ASU as of the beginning of fiscal 2017.  For the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recognized all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the quarter. An income tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million was recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09. Additionally, as required by the new guidance, when calculating diluted earnings per share, excess tax benefits were excluded from the calculation of assumed proceeds since such amounts are recognized in the income statement.  ASU 2016-09 also allows an entity to elect, as an accounting policy, either to estimate the number of forfeited awards or to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  This change did not have a material impact on estimated

---

 

expense.  The Company elected to present the cash flow statement on a retrospective transition method and prior periods have been adjusted to present the excess tax benefits as part of cash flows from operating activities. This resulted in an increase in cash flows from operating activities and a decrease in cash flows from financing activities of $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

 

Note 3 – Net Earnings per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares.  Diluted earnings per share is calculated on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards and other dilutive securities. 



The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015:





Certain stock options and restricted stock units were excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied.  In addition, the following table shows the securities excluded from the computation of earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:





 

Note 4 – Income Taxes



It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015.



The Company recorded income tax expense of $0.5 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 34.6 percent and 33.2 percent for the fiscal year-to-date periods ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from November 2015 to November 2016 primarily relates to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

 

---

 

Note 5 – Inventories



Inventories consisted of the following as of November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016:



 

Note 6 – Long-Term Debt



The following table sets forth the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s long-term debt as of the dates shown.





Principal payments on the debt are due as follows:



 

---

 

Note 7 – Financial Derivatives



The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in foreign currency exchange rates.  The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes.  The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings.  Fair values of derivative instruments are as follows:





Accumulated other comprehensive income included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $6.5 million, $6.7 million, and $5.6 million at November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.



Net Investment Hedging Relationships

The amount of gain or (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income is as follows:





For the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.1 million each quarter, which were included in other comprehensive income as part of a currency translation adjustment.  There were no amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts related to net investment hedges for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015.



At November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015 and August 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts to sell 32.6 million Euro, 28.8 million Euro, and 32.6 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. At November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016, the Company had an outstanding South African Rand foreign currency forward contract to sell 43.0 million South African Rand at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter.  The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.



Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

The Company generally does not elect hedge accounting treatment for derivative contracts related to future settlements of foreign denominated intercompany receivables and payables.  If the Company does not elect hedge accounting treatment for a derivative, the Company carries the derivative at its fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and recognizes any subsequent changes in its fair value during a period through earnings in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  At November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016, the Company had $6.9 million, $9.6 million, and $8.2 million, respectively, of U.S. dollar equivalent of foreign currency forward contracts outstanding that are not designated as hedging instruments.

 

---

 

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements



The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016, respectively. There were no transfers between any levels for the periods presented.



There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three months ended November 30, 2016 or November 30, 2015.



Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies



In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company enters into arrangements that obligate it to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements.  Additionally, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings, business disputes and other legal proceedings.  The Company has established accruals for certain proceedings based on an assessment of probability of loss.  The Company believes that any potential loss in excess of the amounts accrued would not have a material effect on the business or its consolidated financial statements.  Such proceedings are exclusive of environmental remediation matters which are discussed separately below.



Environmental Remediation

In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered from 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”).  The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989.  Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company.  Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic compounds in the soil and groundwater.  To date, the remediation process has consisted primarily of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration.



In fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions.  In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation of source area contamination and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount.  In addition to this source area, the Company determined that volatile organic compounds also existed under one of the manufacturing buildings on the site.  Due to the location, the Company had not yet determined the extent of these compounds or the extent to which they were contributing to groundwater contamination.  Based on the uncertainty of the remediation actions that might be required with respect to this affected area, the Company believed that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs could not be made and accordingly were not accrued at that time.



In December 2014, the EPA requested that the Company prepare a feasibility study related to the site, including the area covered by the building, which resulted in a revision to the Company’s remediation timeline.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company accrued $1.5 million of incremental operating costs to reflect its updated timeline. 



---

 

The Company began soil and groundwater testing in preparation for developing this feasibility study during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company completed its testing which clarified the extent of contamination, including the identification of a source of contamination near the manufacturing building that was not part of the area for which reserves were previously established.  The Company, with the assistance of third-party environmental experts, developed and evaluated remediation alternatives, a proposed remediation plan, and estimated costs.  Based on these estimates of future remediation and operating costs, the Company accrued an additional $13.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and included the related expenses in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  



The current estimated aggregate accrued cost of $18.8 million is based on consideration of several remediation options that would use different technologies, each of which the Company believes could be successful in meeting the long-term regulatory requirements of the site. The Company participated in a preliminary meeting with the EPA and the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (the “NDEQ”) during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 to review remediation alternatives and proposed plans for the site and submitted its remedial alternatives evaluation report to the EPA in August 2016.  The proposed remediation plan is preliminary and has not been approved by the EPA or the NDEQ.  Based on guidance from third-party environmental experts and further discussions with the EPA and the NDEQ, the Company anticipates that a definitive plan will not be agreed upon until later in fiscal 2017 or beyond.

The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. While the Company believes the current accrual is a good faith estimate of the long-term cost of remediation at this site based on the preliminary analysis currently available, the estimate of costs and their timing could change as a result of a number of factors, including (1) EPA and NDEQ input on the proposed remediation plan and any changes which they may subsequently require, (2) refinement of cost estimates and length of time required to complete remediation and post-remediation operations and maintenance, (3) effectiveness of the technology chosen in remediation of the site as well as changes in technology that may become available in the future, and (4) unforeseen circumstances existing at the site. As a result of these factors, the actual amount of costs incurred by the Company in connection with the remediation of contamination of its Lindsay, Nebraska site could exceed the amounts currently accrued for this expense.  While any revisions could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year, the Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.

The following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of November 30, 2016, November 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016:

 

Note 10 – Warranties





Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation



The Company’s current share-based compensation plans, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors of the Company.  The Company measures and

---

 

recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense was $0.9 million for each of the three month periods ended November 30, 2016 and 2015.



The following table illustrates the type and fair value of the share-based compensation awards granted during the three month periods ended November 30, 2016 and 2015:







The RSUs granted during the three months ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of 3,634 and 3,496, respectively of awards that will be settled in cash. The weighted average stock price on the date of the grant was $78.23 and $67.68 for 2016 and 2015, respectively.



The following table provides the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the stock options awarded during the three month periods ended November 30, 2016 and 2015:



 

Note 12 – Other Current Liabilities







 

Note 13 – Share Repurchases



In accordance with its share repurchase program, the Company repurchased 136,263 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9.2 million during the three months ended November 30, 2015. There were no share repurchases during the three months ended November 30, 2016.  The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $63.7 million as of November 30, 2016.

 



Note 14 – Industry Segment Information



The Company manages its business activities in two reportable segments: irrigation and infrastructure.  The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses and income taxes.  Operating income for segment purposes includes general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment.  There are no inter-segment sales included in the amounts disclosed. The Company had no single customer

---

 

who represented 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three month periods ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015.



Irrigation - This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations, controls, filtration solutions and machine-to-machine (“M2M”) technology.  The irrigation reporting segment consists of three operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution. 



Infrastructure – This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of moveable barriers, specialty barriers, crash cushions and end terminals, and road marking and road safety equipment; the manufacture and sale of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures; and the provision of outsourced manufacturing and production services.  The infrastructure reporting segment consists of one operating segment.









---

 

ITEM 2 ‑ Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



Concerning Forward‑Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations and planned financing of the Company.  In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company's web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company.  When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "intend," "will," "plan," “predict,” "project," "outlook," "could," "may," "should" or similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements.  The entire section entitled “Executive Overview and Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements.  For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.



Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2016.  Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated.  Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, as well as other risks and uncertainties not now anticipated.  The risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company's financial results, may emerge from time to time.  Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.



Accounting Policies

In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures.  These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates.  In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience. 



The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies.  See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.  Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change.  There were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three months ended November 30, 2016.



New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



Executive Overview and Outlook

Net earnings for the three months ended November 30, 2016 were $0.9 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, compared with net earnings of $6.9 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  Operating margin for the three months ended November 30, 2016 was 2.5 percent, compared to 9.7 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  The decrease in earnings and operating margin was primarily attributable to lower revenues, which declined 9 percent to $110.4 million from $121.6 million, reduced gross margin, and higher operating expenses of $3.0 million.



The reduction in revenue is mainly attributable to the irrigation segment, where sales decreased 11 percent to $89.9 million. The decline in irrigation revenues was slightly offset by an increase in revenue from the infrastructure segment, in which sales increased one percent to $20.5 million.  In the irrigation segment, the decrease in revenue is primarily due to a reduction in irrigation system unit volume as falling commodity prices and reduced farm income negatively impacted demand for irrigation equipment.  The increase in infrastructure revenues results from higher sales volume in road safety products offset, in part, by lower Road Zipper® system project sales and lease revenue.





---

 

The Company’s irrigation revenues are highly dependent upon the need for irrigated agricultural crop production, which, in turn, depends upon many factors, including the following primary drivers:









 











As the Company continues to manage through a prolonged downturn in the agricultural cycle, there has not been a sufficient catalyst to improvement in the short term. While commodity prices have rebounded somewhat during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, net farm income in the U.S. is projected to be at the lowest level since 2009, leading to uncertainty among growers and resulting in downward pressure on irrigation equipment demand and pricing.  In the international markets, regional political and economic factors, currency conditions and local competition create a challenging environment.  Additionally, international results are heavily dependent upon project sales which tend to fluctuate and can be difficult to forecast accurately. 



---

 

The Company remains confident in the long-term drivers for efficient agricultural irrigation and water use efficiency globally.  The Company has expanded global capacity with the opening of a factory in Turkey that began manufacturing operations in March 2015.  While the additional capacity from the plant in Turkey has created some short-term fixed overhead cost absorption challenges, the Company is confident in the incremental profit potential of global expansion plans and the long-term growth opportunities throughout the region, including in the European, Middle Eastern and African markets.



In a global environment of constrained government spending, demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved safety.  In the United States, the enactment of a $305 billion bill in December 2015 to fund highway, bridge and transit projects over the subsequent five years creates opportunities for market growth in each of the road safety product lines.  While the outlook for infrastructure products in international markets continues to be positive, global or economic slowdowns could negatively impact government spending and have a resultant negative impact on demand for the Company’s products in certain regions.  Domestically, the Federal Highway Administration has mandated a change to certification standards for road safety products to be phased in beginning in 2018.  However, individual states may mandate the adoption of these standards earlier.  This change has required additional research and development spending and could have an impact on the competitive positioning of the Company’s highway safety products.  Overall, the Company’s outlook for infrastructure continues to be positive, although somewhat mitigated by the possibilities of a global economic slowdown and increased regulatory requirements.



As of November 30, 2016, the Company had an order backlog of $55.9 million compared with $61.9 million at November 30, 2015 and $50.7 million at August 31, 2016.  The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts.  Backlog typically represents long-term projects as well as short lead-time orders, and therefore is generally not a good indication of the next fiscal quarter’s revenues.



The global drivers for the Company’s markets of population growth, expanded food production, efficient water use and infrastructure expansion support the Company’s long-term growth goals.  The most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is less developed and demand is driven primarily by food security, water scarcity and population growth.  In the United States, the focus on converting dryland acres to irrigated cropland while increasing the efficiency of water utilization will have an impact on future irrigation equipment demand. 

 

---

 

Results of Operations



For the Three Months ended November 30, 2016 compared to the Three Months ended November 30, 2015



The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015.    It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

Revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2016 declined nine percent to $110.4 million from $121.6 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015, as irrigation revenues decreased $11.5 million and infrastructure revenues increased $0.2 million.  The irrigation segment provided 81 percent of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended November 30, 2016 as compared to 83 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2015.



U.S. irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2016 of $50.3 million decreased $8.9 million or 15 percent from $59.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015,  primarily due to a reduction in irrigation system unit volume as falling commodity prices and reduced farm income negatively impacted demand for irrigation equipment.  



International irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2016 of $39.5 million decreased $2.6 million or six percent from $42.1 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  Changes in foreign currency translation rates compared to the same prior year period had a favorable impact on revenues of approximately three percent.  Excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, international irrigation revenues decreased nine percent for the three months ended November 30, 2016 compared to the same prior year period, as improved sales volume in Brazil, Africa and the Middle East were more than offset by declines in other markets.  



Infrastructure segment revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2016 of $20.5 million increased $0.2 million or one percent from $20.3 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  The increase resulted from higher sales volume in road safety products offset by lower Road Zipper® system project sales and lease revenue compared with the same period in the prior year.



---

 

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended November 30, 2016 of $28.4 million decreased 18 percent from $34.4 million for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to lower irrigation sales and a decline in gross margin to 25.7 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2016 from 28.3 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2015.  Improved gross margin in the infrastructure segment was more than offset by lower gross margin in the irrigation segment.  Irrigation margin decreased over three percentage points compared to the prior year due to lower overhead cost absorption from lower unit volume, increased product warranty costs due to a specific component field-fix, and changes in the international regional mix of sales.  Infrastructure margin improved almost two percentage points as the result of improved cost absorption in Road Zipper® system production and volume leverage from road safety product sales.



Operating Expenses

Operating expenses of $25.6 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 increased by $3.0 million over operating expenses in the three months ended November 30, 2015.  Operating expenses in the first quarter of the prior year were lowered by the reversal of a $1.2 million bad debt reserve related to the collection of a previously reserved account.  Increased operating expenses in the first quarter of the current year resulted primarily from higher new product development and testing costs, some specific project-related legal and outside consulting service fees, and higher personnel-related costs.  Operating expenses were 23.2 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2016 compared to 18.6 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2015. 



Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $0.5 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively.  The effective income tax rate was 34.6 percent and 33.2 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively.  The increase in the effective income tax rate from November 2015 to November 2016 primarily relates to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company's cash and cash equivalents totaled $103.1 million at November 30, 2016 compared with $129.3 million at November 30, 2015 and $101.2 million at August 31, 2016.  The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for dividends and share repurchases.  The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under its credit arrangements described below.  The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its continuing bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and dividends.  The Company may require additional borrowings to fund potential acquisitions in the future.



The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries was approximately $38.8 million, $30.8 million and $34.6 million as of November 30, 2016,  November 30, 2015 and August 31, 2016, respectively.  The Company considers earnings in foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested in those subsidiaries and would need to accrue and pay taxes if such earnings were repatriated to the United States.  Accordingly, the Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity.  



Net working capital was $190.3 million at November 30, 2016, as compared with $208.8 million at November 30, 2015 and $188.9 million at August 31, 2016. Cash provided by operations totaled $8.1 million during the three months ended November 30, 2016, a decrease of $0.4 million compared to cash provided by operations of $8.5 million during the three months ended November 30, 2015.  This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in net earnings as well as changes in working capital.



Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $1.4 million during the three months ended November 30, 2016 compared to $4.2 million used in investing activities during the three months ended November 30, 2015.  The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in capital spending.  Capital spending was  $1.4 million in the first three months of fiscal 2017 compared to capital spending of $4.7 million in the same period of the prior fiscal year.



Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $3.8 million during the three months ended November 30, 2016 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $13.1 million during the same prior year period.  The decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to a $9.2 million reduction in the repurchase of common shares for fiscal 2017 compared to the prior fiscal year.  



Capital Allocation Plan

The Company’s capital allocation plan is to continue investing in revenue and earnings growth, combined with a defined process for enhancing returns to stockholders. Under the Company’s announced capital allocation plan in January 2014, the priorities for uses of cash include:

---

 



Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2017 are estimated to be between $14.0 million and $17.0 million largely focused on manufacturing capacity expansion and productivity improvements.  The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.



Dividends

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.29 per common share, or a total of $3.1 million, to stockholders as compared to $0.28 per common share or $3.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.  



Share Repurchases

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock through January 2, 2016.  On July 22, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors increased its outstanding share repurchase authorization by $100.0 million with no expiration.  Under the program, shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions as well as under formalized trading plans in accordance with the guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  There were no share repurchases for the three months ended November 30, 2016.  During the three months ended November 30, 2015, the Company repurchased 136,263 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9.2 million.  The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $63.7 million as of November 30, 2016.  



Long-Term Borrowing Facilities



Series A, Senior Notes.    On February 19, 2015, the Company issued $115.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes, Series A (the “Senior Notes”).  The entire principal of the Senior Notes is due and payable on February 19, 2030.  Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually at a fixed annual rate of 3.82 percent and borrowings under the Senior Notes are unsecured.  The Company intends to use the proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and dividends.



Revolving Credit Facility.  On February 18, 2015, the Company entered into a $50 million unsecured Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”). The Revolving Credit Facility replaced a previous revolving credit facility from Wells Fargo originally entered into on January 24, 2008 and last amended on January 22, 2014.  The Company intends to use borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility for working capital purposes and to fund acquisitions. At November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.  The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Facility is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo then outstanding.  At November 30, 2016, the Company had the ability to borrow up to $43.8 million under the Revolving Credit Facility, after consideration of outstanding standby letters of credit of $6.2 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points (1.52 percent at November 30, 2016), subject to adjustment as set forth in the loan documents for the Revolving Credit Facility.  Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type.  The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility.  Unpaid principal and interest on the Revolving Credit Facility is due by February 18, 2018.



Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility have equal priority with borrowings under the Company’s Senior Notes.  Each of the credit arrangements described above include certain covenants relating primarily to the Company’s financial condition. These financial covenants include a funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio.  Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts outstanding thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable.  At November 30, 2016,  November 30, 2015 and August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all financial loan covenants contained in its credit arrangements in place as of each of those dates.



Elecsys Series 2006A Bonds.  Elecsys Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has outstanding $2.1 million in principal amount of industrial revenue bonds that were issued in 2006 (the “Series 2006A Bonds”).  Principal and interest on the Series 2006A Bonds are payable monthly through maturity on September 1, 2026.  The interest rate is adjustable based on the yield of the 5-year United States Treasury Notes, plus 0.45 percent (2.28 percent as of November 30, 2016).  The obligations under the Series 2006A Bonds are secured by a first priority security interest in certain real estate.



---

 

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.



 

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes from the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.  See discussion of the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under Part II, Item 7A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.

 

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).  Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of November 30, 2016.



Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings

See the disclosure in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which disclosure is hereby incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 1A – Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. See the discussion of the Company’s risk factors under Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.



ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.



ITEM  3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.



ITEM 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.



ITEM  5 – Other Information

None.





---

 

ITEM 6 – Exhibits





___________________________________



† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto pursuant to Item 6 of Part II of Form 10-Q.



* Filed herein.



** Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text.  This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission with the redacted text pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



 

---

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 21st day of December 2016.





 





---